SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

Commission File Number 0-28732

SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (954) 523-2200

     Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

     Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common stock, $.01 par value

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YES o NO þ

     The aggregate market value of the shares of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant is approximately $46,423,265 based upon the closing market price on June 30, 2004 of $8.26 per share of common stock on the NASDAQ National Market as reported by the Wall Street Journal.

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. YES þ NO o

     There were 23,554,620 shares of the registrant’s common stock par value $0.01 per share outstanding, at March 1, 2005.

SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
2004 FORM 10-K
Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business.

A. General

     Seabulk International, Inc. operates three main lines of businesses – offshore energy support, marine transportation (tankers), and marine towing. Our offshore energy services fleet, numbering 109 vessels, is one of the world’s largest and provides services to operators of offshore oil and gas exploration, development and production facilities in the Gulf of Mexico, the Arabian Gulf, offshore West Africa, South America and Southeast Asia. Our tanker fleet consists of ten U.S.-flag tankers and two foreign-flag tankers. Nine of the U.S.-flag tankers are engaged in coastwise trade carrying petroleum products, crude oil, and chemicals, and one is employed in U.S. foreign commerce. The two foreign-flag vessels, acquired in March and April 2004, have been employed in the world-wide foreign product tanker shipping trade. Our marine towing fleet numbers 26 vessels and is one of the largest and most modern in the United States and provides domestic harbor and offshore towing services. We are a leading provider of commercial tug services in our four ports in Florida: Port Canaveral, Port Everglades, and Tampa (including Port Manatee). We are also a leading provider of those services in Mobile, Alabama; Lake Charles, Louisiana; and Port Arthur, Texas. We also provide offshore towing services primarily in the Gulf of Mexico.

     As used in this Form 10-K Annual Report (the “Report”), the terms “we,” “our,” “us” and “the Company” refer to Seabulk International, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries. Our principal executive offices are located at 2200 Eller Drive, P.O. Box 13038, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316, and our telephone number is (954) 523-2200.

B. Projections and Other Forward-Looking Information

     This Report contains, and other communications by us may contain, projections or other “forward-looking” information. Forward-looking information includes all statements regarding our expected financial position, results of operations, cash flows, financing plans, business strategy, budgets, capital and other expenditures, competitive position, growth opportunities for existing or new services, management plans and objectives, and markets for securities. Like other businesses, we are subject to risks and other uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any projections or that could cause other forward-looking information to prove incorrect. In addition to general economic and business risks, some of the specific risks to which our business is subject are:

•	declines in oil or gas prices, which tend to cause reductions in exploration, development and production activities and, in turn, reductions in the use of offshore energy support vessels and in the rates paid for their use;
•	increased construction of new offshore energy support vessels or construction of new Jones Act product tankers by competitors, which can cause oversupply in the market and consequent reductions in the use of our offshore energy support vessels and Jones Act product tankers and reductions in the rates paid for their use;
•	international political instability, which can lead to reductions in exploration, development and production activities, particularly in less developed regions;

2

•	fluctuations in weather, which can lead to declines in energy consumption and resulting declines in oil or gas prices;
•	changes in laws and regulations affecting the tankers industry, including any possible weakening of the Jones Act, which could result in increased competition from non-U.S. companies in our domestic offshore energy support, towing, and petroleum and chemical product tanker businesses;
•	changes in environmental laws and regulations, including any possible weakening of the U.S. Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (“OPA 90”), which could result in increased competition for the petroleum and chemical product transportation services provided by our modern double-hull fleet;
•	risks associated with potential oil spills or other environmental pollution incidents, which, although believed to be covered by liability insurance, may result in adverse market reaction and loss of business; and
•	terrorist attacks or hijackings, which could disable or destroy one of our vessels and result in significant loss of hire and revenue.

     Additional information regarding these and other factors affecting our business appears elsewhere in this Report under “Additional Business and Corporate Risk Factors.”

C. Recent Developments

     In January 2005, the Company took delivery of the Seabulk Carmen and delivered three of the Company’s offshore crewboats and one offshore support vessel, which was held for sale, to Centurion Marine Offshore, L.L.C. The transaction is a like-kind exchange of assets of equal value of approximately $4.4 million and is a tax-free transaction to the Company.

     In January 2005, the Company took delivery of the Seabulk Angra, our second newbuild vessel constructed in Brazil.

3

D. Fleet Overview

     The following table lists the types of vessels, by assigned operating region or segments, which the Company owned, operated, or chartered as of March 1, 2005:

     For the year ended December 31, 2004, 11 offshore energy support vessels were sold, including five in the Gulf of Mexico, one of which was held-for-sale, four in West Africa, one in the Middle East, and one in Southeast Asia.

4

     For financial information about our business segments and geographic areas of operation, see Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements.

E. Lines of Business

     (1) Offshore Energy Support (Seabulk Offshore)

     The offshore energy support business accounted for approximately 46.6% of our total revenue in 2004. Offshore energy support vessels are used primarily to transport materials, supplies, equipment, and personnel to drilling rigs and to support the construction, positioning and ongoing operation of oil and gas production platforms. These vessels are hired, or “chartered,” by oil companies and others engaged in offshore exploration and production activities.

     The market for these services is fundamentally driven by the offshore exploration, development, and production activities of oil and gas companies worldwide. The level of these activities depends primarily on the capital expenditures of oil and gas producers, which has traditionally been a function of current and anticipated oil and gas prices. Oil and gas prices are influenced by a variety of factors, including worldwide demand, production levels, inventory levels, governmental policies regarding exploration and development of reserves, and political factors in producing countries.

		Offshore energy support services are provided primarily by the following types of vessels:
	•	Supply boats (also called workboats) are generally steel-hull vessels of at least 150 feet in length. They serve exploration and production facilities and support offshore construction and maintenance activities and are differentiated from other vessel types by cargo flexibility and capacity. In addition to transporting deck cargo, such as drill pipe and heavy equipment, supply boats transport liquid mud, potable and drilling water, diesel fuel, dry bulk cement, and dry bulk mud. With their relatively large liquid mud and dry bulk cement capacity and large areas of open deck space, they are generally in greater demand than other types of support vessels for exploration and workover drilling activities.
	•	Anchor handling vessels, which include anchor handling tug/supply vessels and some tugs, are more powerful than supply boats and are used to tow and position drilling rigs, production facilities and construction barges. Some of these vessels are specially equipped to assist tankers while they are loading from single-point buoy mooring systems, and others are used in place of supply boats when not performing towing and positioning functions.
	•	Crewboats (also called crew/supply boats) are faster and smaller than supply boats and are used primarily to transport personnel and light cargo, including food and supplies, to and among production platforms, rigs and other offshore installations. These vessels are chartered together with supply boats to support drilling or construction operations or, separately, to serve the various requirements of offshore production platforms. Crewboats are typically aluminum-hull vessels and generally have longer useful lives than steel-hull supply boats. Crewboats also provide a cost-effective alternative to helicopter transportation services and can operate reliably in all but the most severe weather conditions. However, our strategy is to focus on higher-value, higher-margin vessels and de-emphasize the smaller, lower-margin crewboat business. As a result, the Company sold four crewboats during 2004 and its strategy is to continue to de-emphasize its crewboat business in 2005.

5

     Approximately 22.8% of our 2004 offshore revenue was derived from domestic operations under U.S.-flag vessel registration in the Gulf of Mexico, directed from offices in Amelia, Louisiana. The balance was derived from international operations, including offshore West Africa, the Arabian Gulf and adjacent areas, such as India, and Southeast Asia. We also operate offshore energy support vessels in other regions, including Brazil. Operations in the Arabian Gulf, Southeast Asia and adjacent areas are directed from facilities in Dubai, United Arab Emirates; operations in offshore West Africa and certain other international areas are directed from facilities in Nyon, Switzerland; and operations in Mexico and Brazil are directed from our Amelia, Louisiana facility. We also have sales offices and/or maintenance and other facilities in many of the countries where our vessels operate.

     The average age of our offshore energy support vessels, based on the later of the date of construction or rebuilding, is approximately 17 years. Of the offshore fleet, approximately 29% are less than 10 years old and approximately 52% are more than 20 years old. After a vessel has been in service for approximately 25-30 years, the costs of repair, vessel certification and maintenance may not be economically justifiable.

     (2) Marine Transportation (Seabulk Tankers)

     The Company provides marine transportation services, principally for petroleum products and petrochemicals, in the U.S. domestic or “coastwise” trade, a market largely insulated from direct international competition under the Jones Act. Tankers consists of our ten U.S.-flag tankers, five of which are double-hulled, and our two double-hull foreign-flag tankers, one of which began international service for us in the first quarter of 2004 and the other in the second quarter of 2004. Seabulk Tankers accounted for approximately 41.9% of our total revenue in 2004.

     Petroleum Product Transportation. In the domestic energy transportation trade, oceangoing vessels transport fuel and other petroleum products, primarily from refineries and storage facilities along the coast of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico to utilities, waterfront industrial facilities and distribution facilities along the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, as well as transportation of petroleum crude and product between Alaska, the West Coast and Hawaii. The number of U.S.-flag oceangoing vessels eligible to participate in the U.S. domestic trade and capable of transporting fuel or petroleum products has steadily decreased since 1980, as vessels have reached the end of their useful lives, the cost of constructing vessels in the United States (a requirement for U.S. domestic coastwise trade participation) has substantially increased, and single-hull tanker vessels are being retired due to the age requirements of OPA 90.

6

     At March 1, 2005, the Company operated the following U.S.-flag petroleum product tankers:

     The Seabulk Energy, Seabulk Arctic, Seabulk Mariner, Seabulk Pride, and Brenton Reef are our five double-hull carriers. These vessels are the newest and most technologically advanced product carriers in the Jones Act market.

     The Company acquired the Seabulk Power in March 1998. Under OPA 90, this vessel cannot be used to transport petroleum and petroleum products in U.S. coastwise commerce after 2008. The Company acquired the Seabulk Challenge and Seabulk Trader in August 1996. Their OPA 90 retirement date is 2011. The double-hulls have no retirement date under OPA 90.

     At March 1, 2005, seven of the Company’s U.S.-flag petroleum product tankers were operating under time charters, and one vessel trades under a consecutive voyage charter in foreign commerce.

     Chemical Transportation. In the U.S. domestic coastwise chemical transportation trade, vessels carry chemicals, primarily from chemical manufacturing plants and storage tank facilities along the coast of the U.S. Gulf of Mexico to industrial users in and around Atlantic and Pacific coast ports. The chemicals transported consist primarily of caustic soda, paraxylene, alkylates, toluene and lubricating oils. Some of the chemicals transported must be carried in vessels with specially coated or stainless steel cargo tanks; many of them are very sensitive to contamination and require special cargo-handling equipment.

7

     At March 1, 2005, the Company operated the following U.S.-flag chemical product tankers:

     The Seabulk Magnachem and the Seabulk America have full double bottoms (as distinct from double hulls). Double bottoms provide increased protection over single-hull vessels in the event of grounding. The Seabulk America’s stainless steel tanks were constructed without internal structure, which greatly reduces cargo residue from transportation and results in less cargo degradation. Stainless steel tanks, unlike epoxy-coated tanks, also do not require periodic sandblasting and recoating, which the Company deems to be a competitive advantage. Delivered in 1977, the Seabulk Magnachem is a catamaran tug (“CATUG”) or integrated tug and barge (“ITB”) which has a higher level of dependability, propulsion efficiency and performance than an ordinary tug and barge.

     The chemical carriers have from 13 to 24 cargo segregations which are configured and coated to handle various sized parcels of a wide variety of industrial chemical and petroleum products, giving them the ability to handle a broader range of chemicals than chemical-capable product carriers. Many of the chemicals we transport are hazardous substances. Current voyages are generally conducted from the Houston and Corpus Christi (Texas), and Lake Charles (Louisiana) areas to such ports as New York, Philadelphia (Pennsylvania), Baltimore (Maryland), Wilmington (North Carolina), Charleston (South Carolina), Los Angeles and San Francisco (California), and Kalama (Washington). The chemical carriers are also suitable for transporting other cargoes.

     Pursuant to OPA 90, the Seabulk America and Seabulk Magnachem cannot be used to transport petroleum and petroleum products in U.S. coastwise commerce after 2015 and 2007, respectively. The two chemical carriers, Seabulk America and Seabulk Magnachem, can also be used as petroleum tankers until 2015 and 2007, respectively. Seabulk America is among the last independently owned product tankers scheduled to be retired under OPA 90.

     The Company operates the Seabulk Magnachem under a bareboat charter expiring in February 2007 with a purchase option. In December 2004, the Company purchased the minority interest in a partnership that owns the Seabulk America. The Company owned a 67% equity interest and purchased the 33% interest owned by Stolt Tankers (U.S.A.), Inc. for $2.4 million.

     For vessels not operating under time charters or consecutive voyage charters, the Company books cargoes either on a spot (movement-by-movement) or contract of affreightment basis. Approximately 60.0% of contracts for cargo are committed on a 12- to 24-month basis, with minimum and maximum cargo tonnage specified over the period at fixed or escalating rates per ton.

     At March 1, 2005, the Company’s chemical product tankers were operating under contracts of affreightment.

8

     At March 1, 2005, the Company operated the following foreign-flag product tankers:

     Acquired in 2004, the Seabulk Reliant and the Seabulk Trust are our two foreign-flag tankers, operating in foreign trade, carrying petroleum products. The two five-year-old, foreign-flag product tankers are modern double-hull vessels suitable for world-wide trading. Both vessels are operating under time charters in an international product tanker pool.

     (3) Marine Towing (Seabulk Towing)

     Towing is the smallest of the Company’s three businesses and represented approximately 11.5% of our total revenue in 2004. Our harbor operations consist of four ports in Florida, with six tugs in Tampa (including Port Manatee), four tugs in Port Everglades, and three tugs in Port Canaveral. The towing division also has three tugs in Mobile, Alabama, two tugs in Lake Charles, Louisiana, and four tugs in Port Arthur, Texas. Our tugs assist petroleum and chemical product tankers, barges, container ships and other cargo vessels in docking and undocking and in proceeding within the port areas and harbors. We also operate three tugs with offshore towing capabilities that conduct a variety of offshore towing services in the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean. Demand for towing services depends on vessel traffic and oilfield activity, which is in turn generally dependent on local, national and international economic conditions, including the volume of world trade.

     Our tug fleet consists of 16 conventional tugs and 10 tractor tugs, including four Ship Docking Module tractor tugs, known as SDMs. SDMs are innovative ship docking vessels, designed and patented by us, that are more maneuverable, efficient, and flexible and require fewer crew members than conventional harbor tugs.

     In August 2004, the two-year term bareboat-charter of the tug Hollywood to Signet Maritime ended operations in the port of Brownsville, Texas. In January 2004, the tug Eagle II was bareboated to Exxon/SeaRiver for one year with renewable options for service in San Francisco, California. As of March 1, 2005, the Eagle II remained bareboated to Exxon/SeaRiver.

     Harbor Tug Operations. In most U.S. ports, competition is unregulated. Rates are unregulated in all ports that we serve, including the franchised ports. Generally, harbor tugs can be moved from port to port. However, Port Everglades grants non-exclusive franchises to harbor tug operators, which limit tug mobility from that port.

     Port Everglades. Port Everglades is the second largest non-refining petroleum storage and distribution center in the United States, providing substantially all of the petroleum products for South Florida. Seabulk’s Towing franchise requires it to maintain a minimum of three tractor tugs in the port. The franchise is not exclusive and expires in 2007. While the Company is regarded as a high-standards operator, there is no assurance the franchise will be renewed. As of December 31, 2004, the Company operated four tugs in Port Everglades.

9

     Tampa. The Tampa port is comprised of three “sub-ports” (including Port Manatee) and a distant sea buoy, a greater number of tugs is required to be a competitive operator in Tampa than in other ports of similar size. As of December 31, 2004, we operated six tugs, including three tractor tugs, one SDM, and two conventional tugs in the port (including Port Manatee). The Company is conducting outside harbor services in addition to normal harbor operations.

     Port Canaveral. In Port Canaveral, the Company had been the sole franchise holder for harbor-docking services until May 2003 when the Canaveral Port Authority terminated its franchise system. The Company began to face competition by another operator in Port Canaveral in June 2004. We provide docking services for commercial cargo vessels serving central Florida and, on a very limited basis, for cruise ships, as well as for Navy vessels. Currently, the Company operates three tugs in Port Canaveral.

     Mobile. At Mobile, the Company provides docking services primarily to commercial cargo vessels, including vessels transporting coal and other bulk exports. The Company operates three tugs at this port. There is a competing provider. During 2004, Mobile had an increase in revenue due to increased port traffic and advanced operations including an increase in in-bound coal and cruise ship docking in the port.

     Port Arthur and Lake Charles. At Port Arthur and Lake Charles the Company operates six tugs. Currently, four of these tugs serve Port Arthur, Texas and two serve Lake Charles, Louisiana. Each of these ports has a competing provider. Revenue increased due to increased bulk and tanker traffic during 2004.

     Offshore and Bareboat Towing Operations. The Company currently has three tugs working in the offshore towing market conducting a variety of offshore towing services in the Gulf of Mexico and the Atlantic Ocean, and one tug working on a bareboat charter in San Francisco, California.

F. Customers and Charter Terms

     The Company offers offshore energy support services primarily to oil and gas companies and large drilling companies. Consistent with industry practice, our U.S. Gulf of Mexico operations are conducted primarily in the “term” market pursuant to short-term (less than six months) charters at varying day rates. Generally, such short-term charters can be terminated either by us or our customers upon notice of five days or less. Charters in our international markets have terms ranging from a few days to several years.

     The primary purchasers of petroleum product transportation services are utilities, oil and gas companies, and large industrial consumers of fuel with waterfront facilities. The primary purchasers of chemical transportation services are chemical and oil companies. Both services are generally contracted for on the basis of short-term or long-term time charters, voyage charters, contracts of affreightment, or other transportation agreements tailored to the shipper’s requirements. Tesoro and Citgo each accounted for 7% of our 2004 revenue and were our largest customers.

     The Company’s towing services are offered to vessel owners and operators and their agents. Our rates for harbor towing services are set forth in published tariffs and may be modified at any time, subject to competitive factors. The Company also grants volume discounts to major users of harbor services. Offshore towing services are priced based upon the service required on an ad hoc basis.

10

G. Competition

     The Company operates in a competitive environment in all our operations. Although we are insulated from foreign vessel operators in the Jones Act U.S. coastwise trade in our businesses, we are subject to U.S. citizen competitors in these trades. The principal competitive factors in these markets are suitability, reliability and capability of equipment, safety record, personnel, price, service, and reputation. Competitive factors in the offshore energy support segment also include operating conditions and intended vessel use (both of which determine the suitability of vessel type), shallow water versus deepwater needs, the complexity of maintaining logistical support and the cost of transferring equipment from one market to another. Our vessels compete with other vessel and barge operators and, in some areas and markets, with alternative modes of transportation, such as pipelines, rail tank cars, and tank trucks. Moreover, the customers of such services are placing increased emphasis on safety, the environment and quality, partly due to heightened liability for the cargo owner in addition to the vessel owner/operator under OPA 90. With respect to towing services, we compete with other providers of tug services in all of the ports in which we operate. Additional competitors may enter our markets in the future. While U.S.-flag, coastwise-operated vessels are protected under the Jones Act and the Outer Continental Shelf Act, foreign-built, foreign-manned and foreign-owned vessels could be eligible to compete with our vessels operating in the domestic trade if the Jones Act were repealed or waived. There are no current indications that this will occur, although there are continuing attempts by foreign operators to undermine the Jones Act through exceptions and by interpretation.

H. Environmental and Other Regulations

     The Company’s business and operations are subject to significant federal, state, local and international laws and regulations. The principal laws affecting us are described below.

     Environmental. The Company’s business and operations are subject to federal, state, local and international laws and regulations relating to environmental protection and occupational safety and health, including those relating to the generation, storage, handling, emission, transportation and discharge of oil and hazardous and non-hazardous materials, the remediation of contamination and liability for damages to natural resources. The recent trend in environmental legislation and regulation is generally toward stricter standards, and this trend will likely continue.

     Governmental authorities have the power to enforce compliance with applicable environmental protection and operational safety and health laws and regulations, and violators are subject to penalties, fines, injunctions, and other sanctions. The Company believes that our operations currently are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. The Company does not expect that it will be required in the near future to make capital expenditures that are material to the financial condition or operations by reason of environmental laws and regulations; however, because such laws and regulations are frequently changed and may impose increasingly stricter requirements, the Company cannot predict the ultimate cost of complying with these laws and regulations.

     OPA 90. OPA 90 established an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection of the environment from oil spills. OPA 90 affects owners and operators of facilities operating near navigable waters and owners and operators of vessels operating in U.S. waters, which include the navigable waters of the United States and the 200-mile exclusive economic zone of the United States. Although it applies in general to all vessels, for purposes of its liability limits and financial-responsibility and response-planning requirements, OPA 90 differentiates between tank vessels (which include our chemical and petroleum product vessels) and “other vessels” (which include our tugs and offshore energy support vessels).

11

     Under OPA 90, owners and operators of regulated facilities and owners, operators and certain charterers of vessels are “responsible parties” and are jointly, severally and strictly liable for removal costs and damages arising from oil spills relating to their facilities and vessels, unless the spill results solely from the act or omission of certain third parties under specified circumstances, an act of God or an act of war. Damages are defined broadly to include (i) natural resources damages and the costs of remediation thereof; (ii) damages for injury to, or economic losses resulting from the destruction of, real and personal property; (iii) the net loss of taxes, royalties, rents, fees and profits by the U.S. government, a state or political subdivision thereof; (iv) lost profits or impairment of earning capacity due to property or natural resources damage; (v) the net costs of providing increased or additional public services necessitated by a spill response, such as protection from fire, safety or other hazards; and (vi) the loss of subsistence use of natural resources.

     For facilities, the statutory liability of responsible parties is limited to $350.0 million. For tank vessels, the statutory liability of responsible parties is limited to the greater of $1,200 per gross ton or $10.0 million ($2.0 million for a vessel of 3,000 gross tons or less) per vessel; for any “other vessel,” such liability is limited to the greater of $600 per gross ton or $500,000 per vessel. Such liability limits do not apply, however, to an incident caused by the responsible party’s violation of federal safety, construction or operating regulations or by the responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the responsible party fails to report the incident or provide reasonable cooperation and assistance as required by a responsible official in connection with oil removal activities or fails to comply with certain governmental orders. Although we currently maintain maximum available pollution liability insurance, a catastrophic spill or a failure or refusal of the insurance carrier to provide coverage could result in material liability in excess of available insurance coverage, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business results of operations or financial condition.

     Under OPA 90, with certain limited exceptions, all newly built or converted oil tankers carrying crude oil and petroleum products in U.S. waters must be built with double-hulls, and existing single-hull, double-side or double-bottom vessels must be phased out of service at some point, depending upon their size, age and place of discharge, through 2015 unless retrofitted with double-hulls. As a result of this phase-out requirement, as interpreted by the U.S. Coast Guard, our five single-hull chemical and petroleum product tankers will be required to cease transporting petroleum products by 2015, with the first vessel phased out in 2007 and the last vessel phased out in 2015, unless they are modified to install double hulls.

     OPA 90 expanded pre-existing financial responsibility requirements and requires vessel owners and operators to establish and maintain with the U.S. Coast Guard evidence of insurance or qualification as a self-insurer or other evidence of financial responsibility sufficient to meet their potential liabilities under OPA 90. Coast Guard regulations require evidence of financial responsibility demonstrated by insurance, surety bond, self-insurance, or guaranty. The regulations also implement the financial responsibility requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), which imposes liability for discharges of hazardous substances such as chemicals, in an amount equal to $300 per gross ton, thus increasing the overall amount of financial responsibility from $1,200 to $1,500 per gross ton. We have obtained Certificates of Financial Responsibility pursuant to the Coast Guard regulations for our product and chemical carriers through self-insurance and commercial insurance.

     OPA 90 also amended the federal Water Pollution Control Act to require the owner or operator of certain facilities or the owner or operator of a tank vessel to prepare facility or vessel response plans and to contract with oil spill removal organizations to remove to the maximum extent practicable a worst-case discharge. We have complied with these requirements. As is customary, our oil spill response contracts

12

are executory in nature and are not activated unless required. Once activated, we expect our pollution liability insurance to cover the cost of spill removal subject to overall coverage limitations of $1.0 billion; however a failure or refusal of the insurance carrier to provide coverage in the event of a catastrophic spill could result in material liability in excess of available insurance coverage, resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

     OPA 90 does not prevent individual states from imposing their own liability regimes with respect to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, and many states have enacted legislation providing for unlimited liability for oil spills. Some states have issued implementing regulations addressing oil spill liability, financial responsibility, and vessel and facility response planning requirements. We do not anticipate that such legislation or regulations will have any material impact on our operations.

     In addition to OPA 90, the following are examples of environmental and occupational health and safety laws that relate to our business and operations:

     Clean Water Act. The federal Water Pollution Control Act, also referred to as the Clean Water Act, imposes restrictions on the discharge of pollutants into navigable waters of the United States. The Clean Water Act provides for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for any unauthorized discharges and imposes substantial potential liability for the costs of removal, remediation, and damages. State laws for the control of water pollution also provide varying civil, criminal and administrative penalties and liabilities in the case of a discharge of petroleum or hazardous materials into state waters. In addition, the federal Coastal Zone Management Act authorizes state development and implementation of programs to manage non-point source pollution to restore and protect coastal waters.

     The Company manages our exposure to losses from potential discharges of pollutants through the use of well-maintained, well-managed and equipped facilities and vessels and development of safety and environmental programs, including a maritime compliance program and our insurance program; and we believe we will be able to accommodate reasonably foreseeable environmental regulatory changes. There can be no assurance, however, that any new regulations or requirements or any discharge of pollutants by the Company will not have a material effect on us.

     RCRA. The Company’s operations may generate and result in the transportation, treatment and disposal of both hazardous and non-hazardous solid wastes that are subject to the requirements of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) and comparable state and local laws.

     CERCLA. The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and comparable state laws establish strict and, under certain circumstances, joint and several liabilities for specified parties in connection with liability for the investigation and remediation of releases of hazardous materials to the environment and damages to natural resources. The Company has agreed to remediate certain shoreside portions of our former Sun State Marine facility in Green Cove Springs, Florida in cooperation with the state of Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the current owner of the property. The Company has expended approximately $140,000 to date in remediation expenses and anticipates approximately another $40,000 to complete the project over the remainder of 2005. Also, the Company may have certain limited clean-up responsibilities regarding a replacement tenant at the facility.

     Clean Air Act. The federal Clean Air Act requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to promulgate, among other things, standards applicable to the emission of volatile organic compounds and other air pollutants. The Company’s chemical and petroleum product carrier vessels are subject to such vapor control and recovery requirements when loading, unloading, ballasting, cleaning,

13

and conducting other operations in certain ports and are equipped with vapor control systems that satisfy these requirements in all material respects. In addition, the EPA has issued regulations addressing air emission requirements applicable to marine engines. These standards will require modifications to new or replacement marine diesel engines in some cases.

     Coastwise Laws. A substantial portion of the Company’s operations is conducted in the U.S. domestic trade, which is governed by the coastwise laws of the United States (commonly referred to as the Jones Act). The coastwise laws reserve tankers (including harbor tug services) operating between points in the United States (including drilling rigs fixed to the ocean floor on the U.S. outer continental shelf, under the Outer Continental Shelf Act) to vessels built in and documented under the laws of the United States (U.S.-flag) and owned and manned by U.S. citizens, with an exception to the ownership requirement with respect to foreign owned financial entities which own and lease U.S. vessels to U.S. citizen operators. Generally, a corporation is deemed a U.S. citizen so long as (i) it is organized under the laws of the United States or a state, (ii) each of its president or other chief executive officer and the chairman of its board of directors is a citizen, (iii) no more than a minority of the number of its directors necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business are non-citizens, and (iv) 75.0% of the interest and voting power in the corporation are held by U.S. citizens.

     Under the citizenship provisions of the U.S. Merchant Marine Act of 1920 (“Jones Act”) and the Shipping Act of 1916, the Company would lose the privilege of engaging in U.S. coastwise trade if more than 25% of the Company’s outstanding stock was owned by non-U.S. citizens. The Company has a dual stock certificate system to prevent non-U.S. citizens from owning more than 25% of the Company’s common stock. In addition, the Company’s charter provides the Company with certain remedies with respect to any transfer or purported transfer of shares of the Company’s common stock that would result in the ownership by non-U.S. citizens of more than 25% of its common stock.

     The laws of the United States provide that once a vessel is registered under a foreign-flag it cannot thereafter engage in the U.S. coastwise trade. Therefore, the Company’s non-U.S.-flag vessels must continue to be operated abroad, and if the Company was not able to secure charters or contracts abroad for them, and work would otherwise have been available for them in the United States, its operations would be adversely affected. Of the total vessels owned or operated by the Company at December 31, 2004, 76 were registered under the U.S. flag and 72 were registered under foreign flags.

     The Company’s offshore vessels and foreign-flag tankers are subject to international safety and classification standards. U.S.-flag tanker and offshore support vessels operating in the United States are required to undergo periodic inspections and to be recertified under drydock examination at least every five years. Vessels registered under flags other than the United States are subject to similar regulations as governed by the laws of the applicable jurisdictions.

     There have been repeated efforts aimed to repeal or significantly change the Jones Act. Although we believe it is unlikely that the Jones Act will be substantially modified or repealed, there can be no assurance that Congress will not substantially modify or repeal it or that Coast Guard interpretations of it may weaken it. Such changes could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.

     Occupational Health Regulations and Safety Act. The Company’s shoreside facilities and, as of 2001, the Company’s U.S.-based vessels, are subject to occupational safety and health regulations issued by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and comparable state programs. Such regulations currently require the Company to maintain a workplace free of recognized hazards, observe safety and health regulations, maintain records and keep employees informed of safety and health practices and duties. The Company’s vessel operations are also subject to occupational safety and health

14

regulations issued by the U.S. Coast Guard and, to an extent, OSHA. Such regulations currently require the Company to perform monitoring, medical testing and record keeping with respect to mariners engaged in the handling of the various cargoes transported by our chemical and petroleum product vessels."

     Vessel Condition. The Company’s chemical and petroleum product tankers, offshore energy support vessels, and certain of the Company’s tugs are subject to periodic inspection and survey by, and drydocking and maintenance requirements of, the Coast Guard and/or the American Bureau of Shipping and other marine classification societies.

     The Company believes it is currently in compliance in all material respects with environmental and other laws and regulations, including health and safety requirements, to which the Company’s business and operations are subject. The Company is unaware of any pending or threatened material litigation or other material judicial, administrative or arbitration proceedings against us based on any alleged non-compliance with or liability under such laws or regulations, with the exception of the potential for a dispute, claim or litigation in connection with the Sun State remediation matter referred to above. The risks of substantial costs, liabilities, penalties and other sanctions for releases of oil or hazardous materials into the environment or non-compliance are, however, inherent in marine operations, and there can be no assurance that significant costs, liabilities, penalties or other sanctions will not be incurred by or imposed on us in the future.

     International Laws and Regulations. The Company’s vessels that operate internationally are subject to various international conventions, including certain safety, environmental and construction standards, as well as foreign local laws. Among the more significant of the conventions applicable to the fleet are: (i) the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, 1973, 1978 Protocol, (ii) the International Convention on the Safety of Life at Sea, 1978 Protocol, including the International Management Code for the Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention, which went into effect for tank vessels on July 1, 1998, and (iii) the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, as amended in 1995. These conventions govern oil spills and other matters of environmental protection, worker health and safety, and the manning, construction and operation of vessels. Generally, surveys and inspections are performed by internationally recognized classification societies. The vessels that operate internationally are registered primarily in the Marshall Islands, Liberia and Panama.

     Although the Company believes it is in substantial compliance with all applicable requirements, the risks of incurring substantial compliance costs and liabilities and penalties for noncompliance are inherent in marine operations and there can be no assurance that significant costs, liabilities, penalties and other sanctions will not be incurred by us or imposed on us in the future.

I. Insurance

     The Company’s operations are subject to the normal hazards associated with operating vessels carrying large volumes of cargo and rendering services in a marine environment. These hazards include the risk of loss of or damage to the Company’s vessels, damage to third parties as a result of collision, loss, or contamination of cargo, personal injury of employees and third parties, and pollution and other environmental damages. The Company maintains insurance coverage against these hazards with certain deductibles for which we are responsible. Risk of loss of or damage to the Company’s vessels is insured through hull and machinery insurance policies in amounts that approximate fair market value, also subject to certain deductibles. Vessel operating liabilities, such as collision, cargo, environmental, and personal injury, are insured primarily through our participation in a mutual insurance association, the West of England Association (“West of England”).

15

     As of February 20, 2004, the Company switched its protection and indemnity (“P&I”) marine insurance club from Steamship Mutual (“Steamship”) to West of England Association (“West of England”). The premium for 2005 is approximately $223,000 greater than the premium for 2004. The per incident deductible for U.S. Gulf offshore claims decreased from $375,000 to $250,000 for 2005. Because the Company maintains mutual insurance, the Company is subject to potential additional premiums for prior years due to funding requirements and coverage shortfalls of the clubs in the event claims exceed available funds, reserves and reinsurance, and to future premium increases based on prior underwriting loss experience. In order to cover potential future additional insurance calls which might be made by Steamship Mutual for 2002 and 2003, the Company was required to post a letter of credit in the amount of approximately $1.9 million to support such potential additional calls as a condition to its departure from Steamship. The letter of credit will be returned if no additional insurance calls are made. Potential claims liabilities are recorded as insurance expense reserves when they become probable and can be reasonably estimated.

     The Company carries workers’ compensation, maritime employer’s liability, general liability, directors and officer liability, and other insurance customary in the industry. The Company also carries War Risk insurance for all of its vessels for both hull and machinery damage to the vessels and protection and indemnity liability. This insurance provides coverage for marine perils including war, terrorism, sabotage, riots, seizure and piracy.

     The terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, and the continued threat of terrorist activity, together with uncertain investment performance for future years, have created uncertainty in the insurance markets. It is also possible that acts of terrorism could be directed against U.S. companies such as ours. These uncertainties have contributed to significant increases in the premiums quoted for our insurance coverages, which in turn has also contributed to substantial increases in the Company’s insurance deductibles and self-insured retention levels.

     P&I insurance expense decreased by approximately $1.8 million from $9.3 million in 2003 to $7.5 million in 2004. Over the last several years, premiums of both marine and non-marine insurers have been adversely impacted by the erosion of reserves, underwriting losses and increased reinsurance costs. The Company’s hull and machinery insurance was renewed in October 2004. We maintain high levels of self-insurance for P&I and hull and machinery risks through the use of substantial deductibles and self-insured retentions, which may increase in the future. In 2004 we increased our U.S. Gulf offshore segment deductible to $375,000 per incident but eliminated the self-insurance layer we had in prior years. In 2005 that deductible was reduced to $250,000 per incident. We carry coverage related to loss of earnings subject to deductibles ranging from 14 to 30 days for our tanker operations, but not for our offshore and tug operations. Insurance costs represented approximately 6.2% of vessel and voyage costs in 2004.

J. Security

     Heightened awareness of security needs brought about by the events of September 11, 2001 has caused the U.S. Coast Guard, the International Maritime Organization, and the states and local ports to adopt heightened security procedures relating to ports and vessels. The Company has updated its procedures in light of the new requirements.

     In 2002 Congress passed the Maritime Transportation Security Act (the Act) which, together with the International Maritime Organization’s recent security proposals (collectively known as The International Ship and Port Facility Security Code), requires specific security plans for our vessels and more rigorous crew identification requirements. The Company has implemented vessel security plans and procedures for each of its U.S.-flag vessels pursuant to rules implementing the Act which have been

16

issued by the U.S. Coast Guard. The Company anticipates that the costs of security for our business will continue to increase. In addition, both the Company’s U.S.-flag and foreign-flag vessels have been certified under the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code effective July 1, 2004.

K. Risks of Operating Internationally

     The Company’s international offshore vessel support operations are subject to the usual risks inherent in doing business in countries other than the United States. Such risks include changing political conditions, local cabotage and content laws, possible vessel seizure, company nationalization and other governmental actions, currency restrictions and revaluations, import/export restrictions, increases in duty taxes and royalties, war, and terrorist attacks, all of which are beyond the control of the Company.

     In Nigeria there has recently been legislation enacted which will provide for certain Nigerian ownership and crew requirements for offshore vessel support operators such as the Company operating in Nigeria. Waivers of these laws may be obtained in Nigeria through the annual payment of prescribed vessel fees. It is expected that such fees will increase our costs in Nigeria, where we have 20 offshore vessels. The Company has entered into a joint venture with Nigerian interests to operate Nigerian-flag crewboats in Nigeria, partially in response to Nigerian cabotage and local content laws. Although it is impossible to fully predict the effect of any of these developments on the Company, the Company believes these risks to be within acceptable limits and, in view of the mobile nature of the Company’s principal revenue producing assets, does not consider them at this time to constitute a factor materially adverse to the conduct of its international offshore vessel support operations as a whole.

L. Employees

     As of February 1, 2005, the Company had 2,502 employees. Management considers relations with employees to be satisfactory. Renegotiations of labor contracts are on-going. The Company has various collective bargaining arrangements in its towing and tanker segments with expiration dates through December 31, 2007. The Company has approximately 500 members of national maritime labor unions, with approximately 90 members of unions with collective bargaining arrangements expiring by March 31, 2005.

M. Executive Officers of the Registrant

     The following table provides information on the Company’s current executive officers.

17

     Mr. Kurz was elected Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company in April 2000, President in September 2000, and Chairman in September 2002. He formerly served as President of Mobil Shipping and Transportation Company (MOSAT), a Mobil Oil-affiliated company from which he retired in March 2000. Mr. Kurz joined Mobil in London in 1964 as a Chartering Assistant. In 1965 he was transferred to Mobil’s Marine Division in New York. After a series of assignments, he was named Vice President of Planning, Middle East and Marine Transportation, and then President of MOSAT in 1989. Mr. Kurz is past Chairman of the Marine Preservation Association and the Oil Companies International Marine Forum. He serves on the Board of Directors of the American Bureau of Shipping and chairs its Audit Committee. He previously chaired its Finance and Nominating Committees. He also serves on the Boards of the Seamen’s Church Institute and the Coast Guard Foundation. He is a founding member and Chairman of the Massachusetts Maritime Academy’s International Business Advisory Council and a member of the International Advisory Board to the Panama Canal Authority. Mr. Kurz is the recipient of numerous awards and honors, including the International Maritime Hall of Fame Award, the 1999 SeaTrade “Personality of the Year” award, the Seamen’s Church Institute Silver Bell Award, the Order of the U.S.S. St. Mary’s Medal from the State University of New York Maritime College, the U.S. Coast Guard Award and Medal for Meritorious Public Service, and the Seafarers’ House International Golden Compass Award. He holds an Honorary Doctorate Degree from the Massachusetts Maritime Academy.

     Mr. deSostoa has been Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since June 2002. He was previously President and Chief Financial Officer of Zeosoft Corporation, a provider of mobile service networks. Previously, Mr. deSostoa served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of OMI Corporation, an international tanker operator with interests in real estate and energy. Mr. deSostoa was also Chief Financial Officer of the New York City Transit Authority and a partner with Peat Marwick, Mitchell & Co., a public accounting firm, which he joined in 1973.

     Mr. Francois has been Senior Vice President since February 2003 and President, Seabulk Offshore since January 2003. He previously served as Area Manager of domestic offshore marine operations for Tidewater Inc. Previously, Mr. Francois was Division Manager for Zapata Gulf Marine Corporation in Mexico, International Marketing Manager in London for Western Oceanic, Inc., and Area Executive for Tidewater in Egypt. He was also Marketing & Sales Manager for Dillingham Maritime, a division of the Dillingham Corporation. A Vietnam War veteran, Mr. Francois served in the United States Air Force with the rank of Captain.

     Mr. Pellicci has been Senior Vice President—Finance and Planning, and Treasurer since January 2005. He was previously Vice President—Finance and Corporate Controller of the Company, which he joined in January 2001. Mr. Pellicci also continues to serve as Chief Accounting Officer, to which he was appointed in March 2002. He previously served as Director of Corporate Finance and Corporate Controller of Caraustar Industries, Inc. in Atlanta, which he joined in 1989. Prior to that, he was a Senior Auditor with Arthur Andersen & Co. He is a Certified Public Accountant.

     Mr. Rogers has been Senior Vice President and President, Seabulk Towing since July 2002. He was previously Senior Vice President of Marketing for Seabulk Towing, which he joined in October 2001. Previously, Mr. Rogers was Managing Director of Maritime Audit Services for Carnival Corporation and President of Southern Ship Management. Mr. Rogers was successively Port Captain, Ship Manager, Assistant Vice President of Operations and Vice President of Operations for OMI Corporation, which he joined in 1986. He began his career upon graduation from the United States Merchant Marine Academy as a deck officer with Texaco Inc.

18

     Mr. Twaits has been Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since November 2000. He was previously Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Premier Cruise Lines. Previously, Mr. Twaits was in private practice and served as General Counsel and Secretary for Carnival Corporation as well as a Director and Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Carnival Air Lines. Mr. Twaits has also held senior counsel positions with Crowley Maritime Corporation, Trusthouse Forte, Inc., United States Lines, Inc., and a staff counsel position at Pan American World Airways. He is a member of the Florida Bar, the District of Columbia Bar, the American Bar Association and its International Law Section, and the American Corporate Counsel Association.

     Mr. Willrich has been Senior Vice President since June 2000 and President of Seabulk Tankers since March 1998, when he was also elected a corporate Vice President. He was appointed Senior Vice President of Seabulk Tankers in August 1996. He joined the Company as Vice President of Chartering in January 1988. Previously, Mr. Willrich was employed by Diamond Shamrock Chemical Company from 1975 to 1988, where he rose to Division General Manager. Prior to his service with Diamond Shamrock, he worked for Gulf Oil Corporation as a Third Assistant Engineer on various company tankers. He has more than 28 years of experience in the management of Jones Act product tankers.

     Mr. Thyssen has been Vice President since August 2002. He is also Senior Vice President of Marketing & Sales for Seabulk Offshore and Managing Director of Seabulk Offshore, S.A. Mr. Thyssen joined the Company in 1998 when it acquired Care Offshore, where he served as Managing Director and Director of Marketing. Prior to that, he was Manager for Saunier Maritime SARL in Marseilles, a shipbroker and agent, which he joined in 1972. He is a member of the Association Francaise du Petrole.

N. Additional Business and Corporate Risk Factors

     The Company operates in a business environment that has many risks. Listed below are some additional critical risk factors that affect the Company and particularly its offshore vessel support business and that should be considered when evaluating any forward-looking statement. The impact of any one risk factor or a combination of several risk factors could materially impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition and the accuracy of any forward-looking statement made in this Form 10-K.

Risks Relating to Our Business

Demand for many of our services substantially depends on the level of activity in the offshore oil and natural gas exploration, development and production industry.

     The level of offshore oil and natural gas exploration, development and production activity has historically been volatile and is likely to continue to be so in the future. The level of activity is subject to large fluctuations in response to relatively minor changes in a variety of factors that are beyond our control, including:

	•	prevailing oil and natural gas prices and expectations about future prices and price volatility;
	•	the cost of exploring for, producing and delivering oil and natural gas offshore;
	•	worldwide demand for energy and other petroleum products as well as chemical products;
	•	availability and rate of discovery of new oil and natural gas reserves in offshore areas;
	•	local and international political and economic conditions and policies including cabotage and local content laws;
	•	technological advances affecting energy production and consumption;

19

	•	weather conditions;
	•	environmental regulation; and
	•	the ability of oil and natural gas companies to generate or otherwise obtain funds for capital.

     We expect levels of oil and natural gas exploration, development and production activity to continue to be volatile and affect the demand for and rates of our offshore energy support services and, to a lesser extent, tanker services.

     A prolonged material downturn in oil and natural gas prices is likely to cause a substantial decline in expenditures for exploration, development and production activity. Lower levels of expenditure and activity would result in a decline in the demand and lower rates for our offshore energy support services and tanker services. Moreover, approximately 25% of our offshore energy support services are currently conducted in the Gulf of Mexico and are therefore dependent on levels of activity in that region, which may differ from levels of activity in other regions of the world.

Excess vessel supply could depress day rates, charter or spot market rates, and adversely affect our operating results.

     Increases in oil and natural gas prices and higher levels of expenditure by oil and natural gas companies for exploration, development and production may not result in increased demand for our offshore energy support services and tanker services. For example, our offshore energy support segment is affected by the supply of and demand for offshore energy support vessels. During periods when supply exceeds demand, there is significant downward pressure on the rates we can obtain for our vessels. Because vessel operating costs cannot be completely reduced, any reduction in rates adversely affects our results of operations. Currently, demand for our offshore energy support vessels in the important Gulf of Mexico market has improved somewhat, a trend that began in the second half of 2004, particularly in the deep water areas. A significant increase in the capacity of the offshore energy support industry through new construction could not only potentially lower day rates, which would adversely affect our revenues and profitability, but could also worsen the impact of any downturn in oil and natural gas prices on our results of operations and financial condition. Similarly, should our competitors in the domestic petroleum and chemical product tankers industry construct a significant number of new tankers or large capacity integrated or articulated tug and barges, demand for our tanker assets could be negatively impacted. During 2004 there were no newly built U.S.-flag Jones Act product tankers, and no comparably sized tug and barge tank vessels have been announced or delivered in the domestic industry.

The consolidation or loss of companies that charter our offshore energy support and tanker vessels could adversely affect demand for our vessels and reduce our revenues.

     Oil and natural gas companies, energy companies and drilling contractors have undergone substantial consolidation in the last few years and additional consolidation is likely. Consolidation results in fewer companies to charter or contract for our vessels. Also, merger activity among both major and independent oil and natural gas companies affects exploration, development and production activity as the consolidated companies integrate operations to increase efficiency and reduce costs. Less promising exploration and development projects of a combined company may be dropped or delayed. Such activity may result in an exploration and development budget for a combined company that is lower than the total budget of both companies before consolidation, adversely affecting demand for our offshore energy support vessels and tankers, thereby reducing our revenues.

20

Intense competition in our lines of business could result in reduced profitability and loss of market share for us.

     Contracts for our vessels are generally awarded on a competitive basis, and competition in the offshore energy support segment is intense. The most important factors determining whether a contract will be awarded include:

	•	suitability, reliability and capability of equipment;
	•	safety record;
	•	age of equipment;
	•	personnel;
	•	price;
	•	service; and
	•	reputation.

     Many of our major competitors are much larger companies with substantially greater financial resources and substantially larger operating staffs than we have. They may be better able to compete in making vessels available more quickly and efficiently or in constructing new vessels, meeting customers scheduling needs, and withstanding the effect of downturns in the market. As a result, we could lose customers and market share to these competitors.

Acquisitions of vessels and businesses involve risks that could adversely affect our results of operations.

     From time to time we consider possible acquisitions of vessels, vessel fleets and businesses that complement our existing operations. Consummation of such acquisitions is typically subject to the negotiation of definitive agreements. We can give no assurance that we will be able to identify desirable acquisition candidates or that we will be successful in entering into definitive agreements on terms we regard as favorable or satisfactory. Moreover, even if we do enter into a definitive acquisition agreement, the related acquisition may not thereafter be completed. We may be unable to integrate any particular acquisition into our operations successfully or realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. The process of integrating acquired operations into our own may result in unforeseen operating difficulties, may absorb significant management attention and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of our existing operations. Future acquisitions could result in the incurrence of additional indebtedness and liabilities which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We conduct international operations, which involve additional risks.

     We operate vessels worldwide. Operations outside the U.S. involve additional risks, including the possibility of:

	•	restrictive actions by foreign governments, including vessel seizure;
	•	foreign taxation and changes in foreign tax laws;
	•	limitations on repatriation of earnings;
	•	changes in currency exchange rates;
	•	local cabotage and local ownership laws and requirements;
	•	nationalization and expropriation;

21

	•	loss of contract rights; and
	•	political instability, war and civil disturbances or other risks that may limit or disrupt markets.

     Our ability to compete in the international offshore energy support market may be adversely affected by foreign government regulations that favor or require the awarding of contracts to local persons, or that require foreign persons to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. Further, our foreign subsidiaries may face governmentally imposed restrictions on their ability to transfer funds to their parent company.

Revenue from our tanker segment and towing segment could be adversely affected by a decline in demand for domestic refined petroleum products, crude oil or chemical products, or a change in existing methods of delivery in response to certain conditions that may develop.

     A reduction in domestic consumption of refined petroleum products, crude oil or chemical products may adversely affect revenue from our tanker segment and towing segment and therefore our financial condition and results of operations. Weather conditions also affect demand for our tanker services and towing services. For example, a mild winter may reduce demand for heating oil in our areas of operation. Moreover, alternative methods of delivery of refined petroleum, natural gas or crude oil may develop as a result of:

Construction of additional refined petroleum product, natural gas or crude oil pipelines, which could have a material adverse effect on our tanker and towing revenues.

     Long-haul transportation of refined petroleum products, crude oil and natural gas is generally less costly by pipeline than by tanker. Existing pipeline systems are either insufficient to meet demand in, or do not reach all of, the markets served by our tankers. New pipeline segments are being planned and approved for the Florida market. Such activity could have an adverse effect on the volume of our tanker and towing businesses.

Our offshore energy support fleet includes many older vessels.

     The average age of our offshore energy support vessels, based on the later of the date of construction or rebuilding, is approximately 17 years. Approximately 52% of these vessels are more than 20 years old. We believe that after a vessel has been in service for approximately 30 years, repair, vessel certification and maintenance costs may not be economically justifiable. We may not be able to maintain our fleet by extending the economic life of existing vessels through major refurbishment or by acquiring new or used vessels. Some of our competitors have newer fleets and may be able to compete more effectively against us.

We are subject to complex laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations that can adversely affect the cost, manner or feasibility of doing business.

     Increasingly stringent federal, state, local and international laws and regulations governing worker safety and health and the manning, construction and operation of vessels significantly affect our operations. Many aspects of the marine industry are subject to extensive governmental regulation by the U.S. Coast Guard, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the National Transportation Safety Board and the U.S. Customs Service and to regulation by port states and class society organizations such as the American Bureau of Shipping, as well as to international regulations from international treaties such as the Safety of Life at Sea (“SOLAS”) convention administered by port states and class societies. The U.S. Coast Guard, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and the National Transportation Safety Board set safety standards and are authorized to investigate vessel accidents and recommend improved safety standards. The U.S. Customs Service is authorized to inspect vessels at will.

22

     Our business and operations are also subject to federal, state, local and international laws and regulations that control the discharge of oil and hazardous materials into the environment or otherwise relate to environmental protection and occupational safety and health. Compliance with such laws and regulations may require installation of costly equipment or operational changes, and the phase-out of certain product tankers. Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in administrative and civil penalties, criminal sanctions or the suspension or termination of our operations. Some environmental laws impose strict and, under certain circumstances, joint and several liability for remediation of spills and releases of oil and hazardous materials and damage to natural resources, which could subject us to liability without regard to whether we were negligent or at fault. These laws and regulations may expose us to liability for the conduct of or conditions caused by others, including charterers. Moreover, these laws and regulations could change in ways that substantially increase our costs. We cannot be certain that existing laws, regulations or standards, as currently interpreted or reinterpreted in the future, or future laws and regulations will not have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. For more information, see “Environmental and Other Regulations.”

     We are subject to the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, commonly referred to as the Jones Act. The Jones Act requires that vessels used to carry cargo between U.S. ports be constructed, owned and operated by U.S. citizens. To ensure that we are determined to be a U.S. citizen as defined under these laws, our articles of incorporation and by-laws contain certain restrictions on the ownership of our capital stock by persons who are not U.S. citizens and establish certain mechanisms to maintain compliance with these laws. If we are determined at any time not to be in compliance with these citizenship requirements, our vessels would become ineligible to engage in the U.S. coastwise trade, and our business and operating results would be adversely affected.

We could lose Jones Act protection, which would result in additional competition.

     A substantial portion of our operations is conducted in the U.S. coastwise trade. Under the Jones Act, this trade is restricted to vessels built in the United States, owned and manned by U.S. citizens and registered under U.S. law. There have been attempts to repeal or undermine the Jones Act, and these attempts are expected to continue in the future. Repeal of the Jones Act could result in additional competition from vessels built in lower-cost foreign shipyards and owned and manned by foreign nationals with promotional foreign tax incentives and with lower wages and benefits than U.S. citizens, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and our financial condition.

We may have to phase-out some of our single hull tankers from petroleum product transportation service in U.S. waters.

     The Oil Pollution Act of 1990, commonly referred to as OPA 90, establishes a phase-out schedule, depending upon vessel size and age, for non-double-hull vessels carrying crude oil and petroleum products in U.S. coastwise transportation. The phase-out dates for our non-double-hull tankers are as follows: Seabulk Magnachem - 2007, Seabulk Power — 2008, Seabulk Trader — 2011, Seabulk Challenge - 2011 and Seabulk America - 2015. As a result of this requirement, these vessels will be prohibited from transporting crude oil and petroleum products in U.S. coastwise transportation after their phase-out dates unless they are modified to install double hulls. They would also be prohibited from transporting petroleum products in most foreign and international markets under a more accelerated IMO international phase-out schedule, were we to attempt to enter those markets.

23

Our business involves hazardous activities and other risks of loss against which we may not be adequately insured.

     Our business is affected by a number of risks, including:

	•	terrorism;
	•	the mechanical failure of our vessels;
	•	collisions;
	•	vessel loss or damage;
	•	cargo loss or damage;
	•	hostilities; and
	•	labor strikes.

     In addition, the operation of any vessel is subject to the inherent possibility of a catastrophic marine disaster, including oil, fuel or chemical spills and other environmental mishaps, as well as other liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels. Any such event may result in the loss of revenues and increased costs and other liabilities.

     OPA 90 imposes significant liability upon vessel owners, operators and certain charterers for certain oil pollution accidents in the U.S. This has made liability insurance more expensive and has also prompted insurers to consider reducing available liability coverage. We may be unable to maintain or renew insurance coverage at levels and against risks we believe are customary in the industry at commercially reasonable rates, and existing or future coverage may not be adequate to cover claims as they arise. Because we maintain mutual insurance, we are subject to funding requirements and coverage shortfalls in the event claims exceed available funds and reinsurance, and to premium increases based on prior loss experience. Any shortfalls could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition.

We depend on attracting and retaining qualified, skilled employees to operate our business and protect our business expertise.

     Our results of operations depend in part upon our business expertise. We believe that protection of our expertise depends in large part on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel. Any inability we experience in the future to hire, train and retain a sufficient number of qualified employees could impair our ability to manage and maintain our business and to protect our expertise.

     We require skilled employees who can perform physically demanding work on board our vessels. As a result of the volatility of the oil and natural gas industry and the demanding nature of the work, potential employees may choose to pursue employment in fields that offer a more desirable work environment at wage rates that are competitive with ours. With a reduced pool of workers, it is possible that we will have to raise wage rates to attract workers from other fields and to retain our current employees. If we are not able to increase our service rates to our customers to compensate for wage-rate increases, our operating results may be adversely affected.

Our employees are covered by federal laws that may subject us to job-related claims in addition to those provided by state laws.

     Some of our employees are covered by provisions of the Jones Act, the Death on the High Seas Act and general maritime law. These laws typically operate to make liability limits established by state workers’ compensation laws inapplicable to these employees and to permit these employees and their

24

representatives to pursue actions against employers for job-related injuries in federal courts. Because we are not generally protected by the limits imposed by state workers’ compensation statutes, we may have greater exposure for any claims made by these employees.

Our success depends on key members of our management, the loss of whom could disrupt our business operations.

     We depend to a large extent on the business expertise, efforts and continued employment of our executive officers, directors and key management personnel. The loss of services of certain key members of our management could disrupt our operations and have a negative impact on our operating results.

Our borrowing agreements, including our amended credit facility and bond indenture, contain covenants that restrict our activities.

     Our borrowing agreements, including our amended credit facility and bond indenture:

	•	require us to meet certain financial tests, including the maintenance of minimum ratios of leverage, and debt service and indebtedness to net worth;
	•	limit certain liens;
	•	limit additional borrowing;
	•	restrict us from making certain investments;
	•	restrict certain payments, including dividends, on shares of any class of capital stock; and
	•	limit our ability to do certain things, such as entering into certain types of business transactions, including mergers and acquisitions.

     These provisions could limit our future ability to continue to pursue actions or strategies that we believe would be beneficial to our Company, our stockholders or the holders of the notes or may result in default of our borrowing agreements.

     Our insurance costs may rise and no assurance can be given that they will not continue to rise.

     Our P&I marine insurance clubs, West of England and Steamship Mutual, are mutual associations and rely on member premiums, investment reserves and income, and reinsurance to manage liability risks on behalf of their members. Investment losses, underwriting losses, and high costs of reinsurance have caused West of England, and other international marine insurance clubs, to raise the cost of membership, resulting in higher premium costs. Deterioration in this insurance market could lead to higher levels of premiums, deductibles and self-insurance.

     Our controlling shareholders effectively control the outcome of shareholder voting.

     A group of shareholders currently beneficially owns approximately 75% of our voting power. As a result, this group of shareholders has the power to effectively control the outcome of shareholder votes and, therefore, corporate actions requiring such votes. Further, the existence of the controlling group of shareholders may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our shares if they are viewed as discouraging takeover attempts in the future.

     Changes in operating and financing costs could have an adverse impact.

     The impact of changes in operating and financing costs, including foreign currency, interest rates, fuel, insurance and security costs could adversely affect results.

25

O. Website Access to Reports

     Our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Proxy Statements, Insider Transactions, Current Reports on Form 8-K and Registration Statements are available through the Investors page of our website at www.seabulkinternational.com, as soon as reports are electronically filed with the SEC.

Item 2. Properties.

     The Company’s fleet ownership is described in Item 1. Business. Many of the Company’s vessels are mortgaged to secure the Company’s Amended Credit Facility or U.S. Maritime Administration Title XI financing.

     The Company’s principal offices are located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, where the Company leases approximately 36,000 square feet of office and shop space under a lease expiring in 2009. The Company also leases office and other facilities in Amelia, Louisiana; Dubai, the United Arab Emirates; Nyon, Switzerland; Houston, Texas; Tampa, Florida; Port Harcourt, Nigeria; and Singapore. In addition, the Company leases sales offices and maintenance and other facilities in other locations where our vessels operate. The Company believes that its facilities are generally adequate for current and anticipated future use, although the Company may from time to time close or consolidate facilities or lease additional facilities as operations require.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

     Under U.S. law, “United States persons” are prohibited from business activities and contracts in certain countries, including Sudan and Iran. Relating to the prohibitions, the Company filed three reports with and submitted documents to the Office of Foreign Asset Control (“OFAC”) of the U.S. Department of Treasury. One of the reports was also filed with the Bureau of Export Administration of the U.S. Department of Commerce. The reports and documents related to certain limited charters with third parties involving three of the Company’s vessels which called in the Sudan for several months in 1999 and January 2000, and charters with third parties involving several of the Company’s vessels which called in Iran in 1998. In March 2003, the Company received notification from OFAC that the case had been referred to its Civil Penalties Division. Should OFAC determine that these activities constituted violations of the laws or regulations, civil penalties, including fines, could be assessed against the Company and/or certain individuals who knowingly participated in such activities. The Company cannot predict the extent of such penalties; however, management does not believe the outcome of these matters will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

     The Company was sued by Maritime Transport Development Corporation (“MTDC”) in January 2002 in Florida state court in Broward County alleging broker commissions due since 1998 from charters on three of its vessels, the Seabulk Magnachem, Seabulk Challenge and Seabulk Pride, under an alleged broker commission agreement. MTDC was controlled by the founders of our predecessor company. The claim allegedly continues to accrue. The amount alleged to be due is over $800,000, but is subject to offset claims and defenses by the Company. The Company is vigorously defending such charges, but the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome.

     From time to time the Company is also party to personal injury and property damage claims litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business. Protection and indemnity marine liability insurance covers large claims in excess of the substantial deductibles and, for 2002 and 2003, significant self-insured retentions.

26

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

     None.

27

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

     The Common Stock of Seabulk International, Inc. trades on the NASDAQ National Market under the symbol SBLK.

     Warrants issued to former noteholders (the Noteholder Warrants) have an exercise price of $0.01 per share. These warrants expire on June 30, 2007. As of March 1, 2005 there were 157,570 Noteholder Warrants outstanding.

     The Company has not paid and does not expect to pay any dividends on its Common Stock. The Company declared no dividends in 2004 and 2003.

     The following tables set forth the high and low closing prices of the Company’s Common Stock, as reported by the NASDAQ National Market.

     As of March 1, 2005, there were 230 holders of record of the Company’s Common Stock.

     The Company’s ability to pay dividends in the future is subject to certain limitations, contained in the Company’s amended credit facility and the senior notes indenture. Information concerning the Company’s plans, which may involve the issuance of equity required by Item 5, “Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters,” will be incorporated by reference to Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters,” of this Form 10-K and included in the Proxy Statement for the 2005 Annual Stockholders Meeting.

28

     Information regarding our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2004 is disclosed in Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management.”

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

     The selected consolidated financial data presented below should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included elsewhere in this Report.

29

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

     This discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and historical results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Report.

Overview

     The Company has three lines of business: offshore energy support, marine transportation (tankers) and marine towing.

	•	Offshore operates 109 vessels and is one of the world’s largest providers of support services to the offshore oil and gas exploration, development and production industry.
	•	Tankers operates 10 U.S.-flag product tankers and two foreign-flag product tankers. Nine of the U.S-flag product tankers operate in domestic trade and one operates in international trade, carrying petroleum products, crude oil and chemicals. Five of the U.S.-flag vessels have double-hulls and are the newest and most technologically advanced product carriers in the Jones Act market. The foreign-flag tankers, operating in foreign trade, carry petroleum products. The two five-year-old, foreign-flag product tankers are modern double-hull vessels suitable for world-wide trading.
	•	Marine towing operates 26 vessels and has one of the most modern fleets operating in the U.S. We provide towing and harbor assist services in seven ports.

     Since a limited number of customers account for a significant amount of the Company’s worldwide revenue, our results are subject to volatility from changes in spending for energy distribution, exploration, development and production. A significant slowdown in capital spending in our markets can create uncertainty as to the level of demand for our equipment. As a result of the uncertainty, an accurate estimate of earnings and cash flow is difficult.

     The following themes and events are important to an understanding of our business:

•

Our results of operations since the second half of 2001 have been adversely affected by a slowdown in natural gas and crude oil activity in the Gulf of Mexico. However, international demand remains high.

30

		Rates and utilization for our offshore vessels in the Gulf of Mexico began to improve in the third quarter of 2004, and this trend has continued into 2005.
	•	The Company has implemented certain changes to improve profitability including: (1) selective new buildings for offshore vessels, (2) selective acquisitions and charters of existing vessels and tankers, and (3) repositioning offshore vessels and tugboats.
	•	We continue to reduce our exposure to low margin assets and sell offshore vessels that are not an integral part of our core operations. We have reduced our operating expenses through restructuring of our personnel requirements in our offshore division in both domestic and international operations.
	•	The Company entered the foreign-flag tanker market in 2004 with the purchase of two modern product tankers, which have contributed significantly to earnings.
	•	The Company incurs substantial capital requirements for debt service, vessel maintenance, vessel replacement and upgrades to the fleet to comply with increased regulatory requirements.
	•	In August 2003, the Company issued $150.0 million 9.50% senior unsecured notes to increase the Company’s liquidity and renegotiated its primary credit facility. The notes require the semiannual payment of interest only; principal is paid at maturity in 2013. The Company’s credit facility was amended in August 2003 to an $80.0 million revolving facility.
	•	The Company entered into an interest rate swap in October 2003 for the notes to take advantage of a lower available interest rate. The Company effectively converted the fixed rate to a floating rate currently at 7.88%.
	•	The Company has certain restrictions on distributing excess cash from the five U.S.-flag double-hull tankers to fund the Company’s general working capital requirements. It can distribute 100% of excess cash from the Lightships once they have attained $12 million in working capital, which they had as of December 31, 2004. In 2004, the five U.S.-flag double-hull tankers distributed approximately $3.9 million to the Company for working capital purposes. The Company expects to receive $10.0 million during the first quarter of 2005 from the double-hull tankers for working capital purposes.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     Our discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, useful lives of vessels and equipment, deferred tax assets, and certain accrued liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

     We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

     Revenue Recognition. Revenue is generally recorded when services are rendered, the Company has a signed charter agreement or other evidence of an arrangement, pricing is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. For the majority of the offshore energy and towing segments, revenues are recorded on a daily basis as services are rendered. For the tankers segment, revenue is earned under time charters, bareboat charters, consecutive voyage charters or affreightment/voyage contracts. Revenue from time charters and bareboat charters is earned and recognized on a daily basis. Certain time charters contain performance provisions, which provide for decreased fees based upon actual performance against established targets such as speed and fuel consumption. Recorded revenue is based on actual performance. Affreightment/voyage contracts are contracts for cargoes that are committed on a 12 to 30 month basis, with minimum and maximum cargo tonnages specified over the period at fixed or escalating rates per ton.

31

Revenue and voyage expenses for the affreightment contracts and consecutive voyage charters are recognized based upon the percentage of voyage completion. The percentage of voyage completion is based on the number of voyage days worked at the balance sheet date divided by the total number of days expected on the voyage.

     Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

     Asset Impairment. We record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the estimated undiscounted cash flows to be generated by those assets are less than the assets carrying amounts. If the carrying value is not recoverable, the carrying value of the assets is reduced to estimated fair value.

     Useful Lives of Fixed Assets. We determine the useful lives of the vessels and equipment based upon regulatory requirements such as OPA 90, market conditions and operational considerations. We continue to evaluate the reasonableness of the useful lives of the vessels and equipment.

     Major Maintenance Costs. Currently, the costs incurred to drydock our vessels are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the period to the next drydocking, generally 24 to 36 months. At December 31, 2004, the net book value of the deferred drydocking costs was $32.4 million.

     Insurance Premium Accruals. Under the Company’s mutual protection and indemnity (“P&I”) marine insurance policies, the Company could be liable for additional premiums to cover any investment losses and reserve shortfalls experienced by its marine insurance clubs, however additional premiums can only be assessed for open policy years. A policy year closes three years after the policy year has ended. Policy years 2002, 2003 and 2004 are still open. There have been no additional premiums assessed for these policy years and the Company believes it is unlikely that additional premiums for those policy years will be assessed. The Company will record a liability for any such additional premiums if and when they are assessed and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

     Valuation of Deferred Tax Assets. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. After application of the valuation allowance, our net deferred tax assets and liabilities were zero at December 31, 2004 and 2003.

Overview of Revenue

     We derive our revenue from three main lines of business – offshore energy support, tankers, and marine towing. Seabulk Offshore, our domestic and international offshore energy support business, accounted for approximately 46.6% and 50.8% of Company revenue in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Seabulk Tankers, our tankers business, consists of the Company’s Jones Act product tanker business, in which it owns nine petroleum and chemical product tankers in the domestic coastwise trade and leases one chemical product carrier. The tanker business also consists of the Company’s two foreign-flag product tankers which began operations in international trade in March and April 2004. Seabulk Tankers accounted for approximately 41.9% and 37.6% of Company revenue in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Seabulk Towing, our domestic harbor and offshore towing business, accounted for approximately 11.5% and 11.6% of Company revenue in 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Seabulk Offshore

     Revenue from our offshore energy support operations is primarily a function of the size of our fleet, vessel day rates or charter rates, and fleet utilization. Rates and utilization are primarily a function of offshore exploration, development, and production activities. In certain areas where we conduct offshore energy support operations (particularly the U.S. Gulf of Mexico), contracts for the utilization of offshore energy support vessels commonly include

32

termination provisions with three- to five-day notice requirements and no termination penalty. As a result, companies engaged in offshore energy support operations (including us) are particularly sensitive to changes in market demand.

     As the Company’s offshore energy support fleet gets older, our strategy is to look for opportunities to improve our age profile by acquiring higher-value, larger and newer vessels, and selling a number of older and smaller vessels, mainly crewboats.

     The Company sold 11 offshore energy support vessels during 2004 including one which had been held-for-sale for an aggregate total of $6.4 million and a gain of approximately $4.1 million. The Company sold 18 offshore energy support vessels and three tugs during 2003 for an aggregate total of $9.0 million and a gain of approximately $1.5 million. During 2002, the Company sold 17 vessels for a total of $6.8 million and a gain of approximately $55,000.

33

     The following table represents revenue for Seabulk Offshore by major operating area (in thousands):

34

     The following tables set forth, by primary area of operation, average day rates achieved by the offshore energy fleet owned or operated by the Company and average utilization for the periods indicated. Average day rates are calculated by dividing total revenue by the number of days worked. Utilization percentages are based upon the number of working days over a 365/366-day year and the number of vessels in the fleet on the last day of the quarter. Day rates and utilization are not disclosed for categories with a limited number of vessels.

35

36