Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
or |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to |
|
Commission file number: 0-24347 |
The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
65-0694077 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
2000 Ultimate Way,
Weston, FL
|
|
33326 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(954) 331-7000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Title of Class:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).
Yes þ No
o
The aggregate market value of Common Stock, par value $.01 per
share, held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, based upon the
closing sale price of such shares on the Nasdaq National Market
on June 30, 2004 was approximately $185.8 million.
As of February 18, 2005, there were 22,558,866 shares of
the Registrants Common Stock, par value $.01, outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for the 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference
into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
THE ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
PART I |
|
|
Business |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
Properties |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
|
12 |
|
PART II |
|
|
Market for the Registrants Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
Other Information |
|
|
58 |
|
PART III |
|
|
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
Executive Compensation |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
|
|
62 |
|
PART IV |
|
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
|
|
62 |
|
Signatures |
|
|
68 |
|
Consent of KPMG LLP |
Section 302 CEO Certification |
Section 302 CFO Certification |
Section 906 CEO Certification |
Section 906 CFO Certification |
Cautionary Statement |
PART I
This Annual Report on Form 10-K (the
Form 10-K) of The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.
(Ultimate Software or the Company) may
contain certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended. These forward-looking statements represent the
Companys expectations or beliefs, including, but not
limited to, statements concerning the Companys operations
and financial performance and condition. Words such as
anticipates, expects,
intends, plans, believes,
seeks, estimates, and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees
of future performance and are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that are difficult to predict. The Companys
actual results could differ materially from those contained in
the forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties
associated with fluctuations in the Companys quarterly
operating results, concentration of the Companys product
offerings, development risks involved with new products and
technologies, competition, the Companys contractual
relationships with third parties, contract renewals with
business partners, compliance by our customers with the terms of
their contracts with us, and other factors disclosed in the
Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Other factors that may cause such differences
include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this
Form 10-K, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto. The Company
undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
UltiPro® and Intersourcing® and their related designs
are registered trademarks of Ultimate Software in the United
States. This Form 10-K also includes names, trademarks,
service marks and registered trademarks and service marks of
companies other than Ultimate Software.
Item 1. Business
Overview
Ultimate Software designs, markets, implements and supports
payroll and workforce management solutions in the United States.
Ultimate Softwares UltiPro Workforce Management Software
(UltiPro) is a Web-based solution designed to
deliver the functionality businesses need to manage the employee
life cycle, from recruiting and hiring to compensating and
managing benefits to terminating, whether their processes are
centralized at headquarters or distributed across multiple
divisions or branch offices. UltiPros human resources
(HR) and benefits management functionality is wholly
integrated with a flexible payroll engine, reporting and
analytical decision-making tools, and a self-service Web portal
for executives, managers, administrators, and employees to
review and update work-related and personal information.
Ultimate Software believes that UltiPro helps customers
streamline HR and payroll processes to significantly reduce
administrative and operational costs, while also empowering
managers and staff to analyze workforce trends for better
decision making, access critical information quickly and perform
routine business activities efficiently.
UltiPro Workforce Management is marketed both through the
Companys direct sales team as well as through alliances
with business service providers (BSPs) that market
co-branded UltiPro to their customer bases. Ultimate
Softwares direct sales team focuses primarily on companies
with more than 500 employees and sells UltiPro both as a license
model (typically in-house) and a service model (typically hosted
and priced on a per-employee-per-month basis). The
Companys BSP alliances focus primarily on companies with
under 500 employees and typically sell an Internet solution,
which includes UltiPro, priced on a monthly/service basis. In
2004, Ultimate Software extended its BSP program to allow for
alliances that target very large corporations, generally those
having more than 10,000 employees that the Companys direct
sales force would not see in a typical sales process. When the
BSP sells its Internet solution, incorporating UltiPro in the
offering, the BSP is obligated to remit a fee to the Company,
typically measured on a per-employee-per-month basis and, in
some cases, subject to a guaranteed monthly minimum amount.
UltiPro leverages the Microsoft technology platform, which is
recognized in the industry as a cost-effective, reliable and
scalable platform. As part of its comprehensive payroll and
workforce management
solutions, Ultimate Software provides implementation and
training services to its customers as well as support services,
which have been certified by the Support Center Practices
Certification program for six consecutive annual evaluations.
The Companys direct sales force markets UltiPro as an
in-house human resources, payroll and workforce management
solution and alternatively as a hosted offering branded
Intersourcing (the Intersourcing
Offering). Intersourcing provides Web access to
comprehensive workforce management functionality for
organizations that need to simplify the information technology
(IT) support requirements of their business applications.
Ultimate Software believes that Intersourcing is attractive to
companies that want to focus on their core competencies to
increase sales and profits. Through the Intersourcing model
introduced in 2002, the Company provides the hardware,
infrastructure, ongoing maintenance and backup services for its
customers at a BellSouth data center managed by International
Business Machines (IBM).
During 2001, Ultimate Software and Ceridian Corporation
(Ceridian) reached an agreement, as amended in 2002,
which granted Ceridian a non-exclusive license to use UltiPro
software as part of an on-line offering that Ceridian markets
primarily to businesses with less than 500 employees (the
Original Ceridian Agreement). Ceridian marketed this
offering as the SourceWeb solution, which uses UltiPro software
as its core payroll and human resource platform. According to
the financial terms of the Original Ceridian Agreement (the
Ceridian Financial Terms), Ceridian is required
(i) to pay the Company a monthly license fee based on the
number of employees paid using the licensed software, subject to
a minimum monthly payment of $500,000 per month with increases
of 5% per annum, compounded beginning in January 2006. The
aggregate minimum payments that Ceridian is obligated to pay
Ultimate Software under the Original Ceridian Agreement over the
minimum term of the agreement are $42.7 million. To date,
Ceridian has paid to Ultimate Software a total of
$23.0 million under the Original Ceridian Agreement. The
earliest date upon which the Ceridian Agreement can be
terminated by either party (except for an uncured material
breach) is March 9, 2008, resulting in an expected minimum
term of 7 years. Ceridian retains certain rights to use the
software upon termination.
During December 2004, RSM McGladrey Employer Services
(RSM), an existing business service provider of
Ultimate Softwares, acquired Ceridians SourceWeb
HR/payroll and self-service product and existing SourceWeb base
of small and midsize business customers throughout the United
States (the RSM Acquisition). The Ceridian Financial
Terms have not changed as a result of the RSM Acquisition.
Ultimate Software expects to continue to recognize a minimum of
$642,000 per month in recurring revenues from the Original
Ceridian Agreement until its termination.
Ultimate Software is a Delaware corporation formed in April 1996
to assume the business and operations of The Ultimate Software
Group, Ltd. (the Partnership), a limited partnership
founded in 1990. Ultimate Softwares headquarters is
located at 2000 Ultimate Way, Weston, Florida 33326 and its
telephone number is (954) 331-7000. To date, the Company
has derived no revenue from customers outside of the United
States and has no assets located outside of the United States.
Revenue Sources
The Companys revenues are derived from three principal
sources: recurring revenues, services revenues and software
licenses (license revenues).
Recurring revenues consist of maintenance revenues,
Intersourcing revenues and subscription revenues from
per-employee-per-month (PEPM) fees generated by
business partners. Maintenance revenues are derived from
maintaining, supporting and providing periodic updates for the
Companys products under software license agreements.
Subscription revenues are principally derived from PEPM fees
earned through the Intersourcing Offering, Base Hosting (defined
below) and the BSP sales channel, as well as revenues generated
from the Original Ceridian Agreement. Maintenance revenues are
recognized ratably over the service period, generally one year.
To the extent there are upfront fees associated with the
Intersourcing Offering, Base Hosting or the BSP sales channel,
subscription revenues are recognized ratably over the term of
the related contract upon the delivery of the product and
services. PEPM fees from the Intersourcing Offering,
2
Base Hosting and the BSP sales channel are recognized as
subscription revenue (a component of recurring revenues in the
consolidated statements of operations) as the services are
delivered.
Services revenues include revenues from fees charged for the
implementation of the Companys software products and
training of customers in the use of such products, fees for
services provided to business service providers, including those
related to the Ceridian Services Agreement (defined below) which
expired on December 31, 2004, the provision of
payroll-related forms and the printing of Form W-2s
for certain customers and certain reimbursable out-of-pocket
expenses. Revenues for training and implementation consulting
services are typically recognized as services are performed.
Revenues for the Ceridian Services Agreement were recognized
ratably from February 11, 2003 until December 31, 2004
based on the terms of the agreement. Other services are
recognized as the services are rendered or as the product is
shipped.
License revenues include revenues from software license
agreements for the Companys products, entered into between
the Company and its customers in which the license fees are
non-cancellable. License revenues are generally recognized upon
the delivery of the related software product when all
significant contractual obligations have been satisfied. Until
such delivery, the Company records amounts received when
contracts are signed as customer deposits which are included
with deferred revenues in the consolidated balance sheets.
The percentage contribution for each of the three principal
sources of revenue was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring
|
|
|
54.2 |
% |
|
|
48.6 |
% |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
|
Services
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
License
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Features of UltiPro
Ultimate Softwares UltiPro is a payroll and workforce
management solution designed to offer the following features to
its customers:
Web Workforce Portal. UltiPro includes a Web workforce
portal that can serve as a companys communications hub and
the central gateway for business activities. It provides
functionality for everyone in the customers organization,
not just human resources/payroll and finance departments, but
also executives, staff managers and individual employees. With
UltiPros workforce portal, a companys HR/payroll
staff, managers and administrators can complete daily employee
administration tasks, administer benefits, manage staff and
access reporting in real-time, from one central location.
Managers and executives can perform real-time Web queries on
their workforce data, access commonly requested reports and
analyze workforce statistics and trends on-demand. Employees can
review their own pay and benefits information, get questions
answered and complete routine updates instantly. HR and other
administrators can expedite more than 100 routine business
processes such as hiring, rehiring or terminating an employee;
inputting salary increases; and changing an employees job,
division, or department. Ultimate Software believes that
UltiPros workforce portal can increase administrative
efficiencies by providing reporting, staff management processes
and business intelligence to management over the Internet and
can reduce operating costs by eliminating the need for
organizations to print and distribute paper communications,
handbooks, forms and paychecks.
Feature-Rich, Built-in Functionality. UltiPro includes
human resources, payroll, and benefits management, comprehensive
reporting (more than 400 standard and customizable reports
delivered, including government compliance reporting and
strategic analytics), a workforce portal with Web-based employee
and manager self-service, Web-based benefits enrollment, Web
employee administration (including workflow), recruitment and
training management. Based upon the amount of built-in and
integrated functionality, the Company believes that UltiPro
minimizes the need for extensive customizations or changes to
source code,
3
facilitates streamlined management of the total employment
cycle, and enables organizations to minimize the time invested
in burdensome HR/payroll administrative activities.
Implementation and System Update Efficiency. Ultimate
Software offers a solution that has been designed to minimize
the time and effort required for implementation, customization
and updating. UltiPro delivers an extensive amount of
functionality out-of-the-box so that minimal
customizations are required by the customer. The Company also
provides an implementation methodology, experienced
implementation staff and customer training to facilitate rapid
implementation. Ultimate Software continues to refine and
improve its implementation process to allow customers to
implement more quickly. To facilitate customizations and fast
system upgrades, the Company has designed UltiPro so that when
users load system updates, they do not overwrite their
customizations because the system stores custom changes as
sub-classed objects or data that reside outside the
core program, thus avoiding the time-consuming process of
rewriting custom changes.
Reduced Total Cost of Ownership. The Company believes
that the UltiPro solution provides cost saving opportunities for
its customers and that UltiPro, whether purchased as a license
or as a service through Intersourcing, is competitively priced.
In addition, the Company believes that its current practices in
implementing the UltiPro solution result in a cost savings for
customers when compared with implementations of other similar
solutions in the industry. A customer may also reduce the
administrative and information technology support costs
associated with the organizations human resources,
benefits and payroll functions over time. Tight integration
helps to reduce administrative costs by facilitating accurate
information processing and reporting, and reducing
discrepancies, errors and the need for time-consuming
adjustments. In addition, administrative costs can be reduced by
providing an organization with greater access to information and
control over reporting.
Leveraging of Leading Technologies. Ultimate Software has
consistently focused on identifying leading technologies and
integrating them into its products. UltiPro Workforce Management
is a three-tier solution that leverages Microsofts
technical architecture as well as XML to increase design
efficiencies within the system and particularly for workflow
capabilities. With UltiPro version 6.0, released in 2002,
Ultimate Software introduced new technology architecture for
UltiPro to enable advanced Web Services capabilities. Ultimate
Softwares Distributed Process Management platform
leverages leading technologies such as Microsofts
Component Object Model (COM), Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ),
eXtensible Markup Language (XML), Simple Object Access Protocol
(SOAP) and Web Services Definition Language (WSDL) to
create a distributed processing framework that is
Internet-enabled. This allows customers to initiate commonly
requested services such as running a report from the Web. These
requests are automatically routed to a separate process
application server to ensure efficient processing and load
balancing. UltiPros XML Web Services feature set allows
customers to scale as they grow and take advantage of additional
Web Services as needed. With UltiPro version 7.0, released in
2003, Ultimate Software enhanced and validated the performance
of UltiPros Internet functions, including eEmployee
Self-Service, eManagement, and eAdministration by benchmark
testing with Mercury Loadrunner Controller. In addition, UltiPro
includes a suite of enterprise integration tools, business
components and business-to-business links. These tools are
designed to take advantage of emerging Internet-based technology
standards such as XML, HTTP and Java scripting.
Ease of Use and Navigation. Ultimate Software designs its
products to be user-friendly and to simplify the complexities of
managing employees and complying with government regulations in
the payroll and workforce management areas. UltiPro uses
familiar Internet interface techniques and functions through a
Web browser, which the Company believes makes it convenient and
easy to use. A customers executives, managers,
administrators and employees have Web access to manage payroll
and employee functions, run reports or find answers to routine
questions through an intuitive user interface. The Company
refers to this easy navigation as Two clicks to
anywhere.
Comprehensive Professional Services and Industry-Specific
Expertise. Ultimate Software believes it provides high
quality implementation, training and ongoing product and
customer support services. Ultimate Software employs
approximately 170 people in customer services, which includes
the implementation, product support, technical support and
training departments. Ultimate Softwares customer support
center has received the Support Center Practices
(SCP) Certification for the sixth consecutive year.
The SCP
4
program was created by the Service & Support Professionals
Association (SSPA) and a consortium of information
technology companies to create a recognized quality
certification for support centers. SCP Certification quantifies
the effectiveness of customer support based upon relevant
performance standards and represents best practices within the
technology support industry according to SSPA. Recognizing the
importance of issuing timely updates that reflect changes in tax
and other regulatory laws, Ultimate Software employs a dedicated
research team to track jurisdictional tax changes to the more
than 12,000 tax codes included in UltiPro as well as changes in
other employee-related regulations.
Technology
Ultimate Software seeks to provide its clients with optimum
performance, advanced functionality and ease of scalability and
access to information through the use of leading Internet
standard technologies. The UltiPro Workforce Management solution
was designed to leverage cutting-edge technologies such as XML
and Web Services that use open standards to provide customers
with a cost-effective platform for performing critical business
functions rapidly over the Web and allowing different systems to
communicate with one another. The use of Microsoft technology
helps the Company to deliver what it believes to be a highly
deployable and manageable payroll and workforce management
solution that includes the following key technological features:
Web-Based Technologies and Internet Integration. Ultimate
Software supports emerging Web technologies and
Internet/extranet connectivity to increase access to and
usability of its applications. UltiPro is a Web solution with a
back office component for handling such functions as payroll
processing, company and system setup, and security. One of the
highlights of UltiPros technology is the Companys
Distributed Process Management (DPM) framework of
XML Web Services, a framework that enables business functions to
be performed over the Web, and allows different enterprise
systems to talk to one another over the Internet. UltiPros
DPM was designed to automate and distribute HR and payroll
processes, for example, entering group time or generating
reports, across multiple servers to reduce the amount of time
and manual work required. The DPM framework leverages
Microsofts Component Object Model (COM), eXtensible Markup
Language (XML), Simple Object Access Protocol (SOAP), Web
Services Definition Language (WSDL) and Microsoft Message
Queuing (MSMQ) to improve system speed and performance. The
Company believes that the DPM framework makes UltiPro highly
scalable to accommodate a high volume of processing requests
cost-effectively, particularly for companies that run hundreds
or even thousands of payrolls.
Application Framework. Ultimate Software has designed
certain aspects of its system using a multi-tiered architecture
in order to enhance the systems speed, flexibility,
scalability and maintainability. When an applications
logic resides only on a client workstation, a users
ability to process high volume data transactions is limited.
When the logic resides only on a server, the users
interactive capabilities are reduced. To overcome such
limitations, Ultimate Software built more separation into the
application design to increase the extensibility, scalability
and maintainability of the application. The UltiPro Workforce
Management application consists of several core components in a
layered architecture that leverages Microsoft technology.
UltiPros multi-layered architecture, including an
Operating System Layer, Business Logic Layer, Presentation Layer
and User Interface Layer, makes it easier to update and maintain
UltiPro, as well as integrate UltiPro with other enterprise
systems. The Company believes that UltiPros application
framework provides a highly extensible set of services that can
scale depending on the customers business size. In
addition, UltiPro was built using a data-driven, object-oriented
application framework that enhances the development and
usability of the solution. Object-oriented programming features
code reusability and visual form/object inheritance, which
decrease the time and cost of developing and fully implementing
a new system. With object-oriented programming, system updates
do not overwrite prior customizations to the system because
custom changes are sub-classed objects that reside
outside the core program.
Business Intelligence Tools. In addition to an extensive
library of standard reports that offer flexibility and ease of
use, the Company extends what users can do with employee data by
embedding business intelligence tools from Cognos Corporation, a
third-party provider (Cognos). In addition to
offering sophisticated data query and report authoring, these
tools enable users to apply online analytical processing
5
(OLAP) to multidimensional data cubes, allowing
users to explore data on employees graphically and statistically
from diverse angles. Ultimate Software maintains a link between
Cognos report catalog and UltiPros data dictionary,
eliminating the necessity for users to create and maintain ad
hoc reporting catalogs. A Cognos Web Package is delivered to
UltiPro customers to allow users to access reports and conduct
data queries from a Web browser.
Ultimate Software Solutions
Ultimate Softwares core solution, UltiPro Workforce
Management, was originally designed for mid-sized enterprise
customers, primarily those with 500 to 15,000 employees but is
appropriate for and is used by both smaller and larger
organizations. Ultimate Software also offers the Powered
by UltiPro BSP Solution (the BSP Solution)
with Internet Payroll to business services providers that have
relationships with smaller organizations, typically those with
fewer than 500 employees and, since 2004, is now available to
BSPs to use for very large corporations.
UltiPro Workforce Management Software
(UltiPro)
UltiPro Workforce Management is designed to provide customers
the functionality they need to manage every aspect of the
employee life cycle in one place, from recruiting and hiring to
compensating and managing benefits to terminating, whether a
customers processes are centralized at headquarters or
managed by multiple divisions or branch offices. UltiPros
HR and benefits management functionality is wholly integrated
with a flexible payroll engine, reporting and analytical
decision-making tools, and a central Web portal that can serve
as the customers gateway for its workforce to access
company-related activities. Ultimate Software believes that
UltiPro helps customers streamline HR and payroll processes to
significantly reduce administration and operational costs, while
also empowering executives and staff to access critical
information quickly and perform routine business activities more
efficiently.
UltiPro Workforce includes, but is not limited to, the following
functionality:
UltiPros Workforce Portal. UltiPros workforce
portal can act as the gateway for a companys executives,
management team, HR/payroll staff, administrators, and employees
to business activities. Ultimate Software believes that
UltiPros workforce portal allows its customers to improve
service to their employees through better communications and
save time because managers and administrators can complete
hundreds of common employee-related tasks, including
administering benefits, managing staff and accessing reporting
and business intelligence in real-time, from one central
location.
eManager Self-Service. As authorized, managers have
self-service access to staff information such as salary,
compensation history, key dates and emergency contacts, with
reporting and workforce analysis tools to facilitate
decision-making. A customers managers can view and update
staff information, manage department activities, post job
openings, leverage recruiting and hiring tools, and perform Web
queries on workforce data. UltiPros document management
features can be used to house and categorize employee-related
documents such as drivers licenses, consent forms, and
completed I-9s with required identification. Administrators and
managers have the ability to attach Microsoft Word documents,
PDFs, JPEG files, spreadsheets, or any other file types
supported by Microsoft Internet Explorer to employee files. The
documents can be grouped and sorted to individual requirements,
as necessary.
eEmployee Self-Service. UltiPro eEmployee Self-Service
gives a customers employees immediate security-protected
access to view their own paycheck details and benefits
summaries, frequently used forms and company information. They
can also update personal information such as address, phone
number, emergency contacts and skills; change preferences such
as direct deposit accounts and benefits selections; make routine
requests such as asking for vacation time; and enroll in
training.
eAdministration. UltiPros eAdministration includes
eWork Events, eStandard Reporting, and eSystem Administration.
eWork Events enables users to authorize HR/payroll staff,
managers or supervisors to make updates on the Web through more
than 100 pre-defined workflow processes to expedite business
activities such as hiring an employee or inputting a salary
increase. eStandard Reporting allows authorized managers or
6
HR/payroll staff to run standard UltiPro reports, including
upcoming performance reviews, headcount reports, average salary
reports, government compliance reports, general ledger
reporting, and other point-in-time HR/payroll reports from the
Web without requiring the time of central HR/payroll or IT
staff. eSystem Administration was designed for the non-technical
user to administer UltiPros roles-based security, built-in
workflow and system business rules, as well as enable system
administrators to post company communications, link to external
Web sites from the UltiPro portal, and, through UltiPros
ePalette feature, select the colors of UltiPros Web pages
to match the customers own company image.
eHuman Resources. UltiPro tracks HR-related information
including employment history, performance, job and salary
information, career development, and health and wellness
programs. In addition, UltiPro facilitates the recording and
tracking of key information for government compliance and
reporting, including Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation
Act compliance; Health Insurance Portability &
Accountability Act certificates; Occupational Safety &
Health Administration and workers compensation; Family
Medical Leave Act tracking; and Equal Employment Opportunity
compliance. UltiPro also ensures compliance with the Health
Insurance Portability & Accountability Act confidentiality
legislation for protecting sensitive data such as employee
social security numbers. eHuman Resources includes benefits
administration, recruitment and staffing tools, compensation
management and training management functionality.
Payroll Processing. UltiPros payroll engine handles
hundreds of payroll-related computations intended to minimize
the customers need for side calculations or additional
programming. For example, UltiPro delivers complex wage
calculations such as average pay rates for overtime
calculations, shift premiums, garnishments and levy
calculations. With ePayroll Processing, a companys central
payroll department, remote offices or multiple divisions can
process payroll on the Web in several steps. ePayroll Processing
includes eTime Entry to allow customers supervisors or
managers at branch offices to input and submit time for their
team through the Web.
UltiPro Business Intelligence. Using UltiPros
Business Intelligence tools, customers can provide their
managers and executives with Web access to workforce-related
reports, workforce analytics and point-in-time reporting,
without installing reporting software on users PCs or
writing custom reports. With UltiPro Business Intelligence,
users can run and print pre-formatted reports for the executive
team or run instant queries on the Web for answers to routine
questions. UltiPro Business Intelligence also delivers workforce
analytics to enable managers to evaluate workforce trends
strategically on topics such as compensation, turnover and
overtime.
eTraining Enrollment. With eTraining Enrollment,
customers employees can view course schedules and
descriptions and register online. Managers can also approve
staff training requests from the Web.
eBenefits Enrollment. With eBenefits Enrollment,
customers employees can review their benefit choices and
make selections on the Web. Benefits administrators can set up
enrollment sessions from the Web and use tools to monitor
enrollment progress. eBenefits Enrollment also walks employees
through all of the benefit and personal information changes
necessary as a result of a life event such as getting married,
having a baby or moving.
eRecruitment. UltiPro eRecruitment automates, tracks and
manages the hiring and recruiting process to help reduce overall
cost per hire and time to hire. With
UltiPro eRecruitment, users can post openings to job sites they
subscribe to, track applications and hire candidates from within
UltiPros workforce portal.
eCo-Branding. For organizations that want to co-brand
UltiPro for the purpose of delivering services to a customer
base, UltiPro offers eCo-Branding as an extra-cost option.
eCo-Branding provides Web access to important personal
information for customers employees, including the ability
to view current paycheck and direct deposit details, paycheck
history and benefits details. Customers can display their own
company logo with the Powered by UltiPro logo to
their user base to strengthen their brand.
Position Management. UltiPro Position Management helps
customers manage their resource budget, measure trends and
forecast future needs. Users can manage by full-time employee
equivalents and dollars, and evaluate budgeted versus actual
numbers. Authorized users can check the status of fund
allocations, available open positions and staffing requirements.
Because HR and payroll are integrated, reporting on position
information for budgeted and actual does not require multiple
spreadsheets.
7
UltiPro Wireless. Ultimate Software recognizes the mobile
workforce today and delivers a wireless application geared for
todays mobile employees, managers, administrators and
executives. UltiPro Wireless provides employees with access to
their paycheck details and company directory via a wireless
device. Managers can elect to receive wireless notifications for
workflow events requiring their approval (such as an employee
vacation request).
Other Key Features. UltiPro also includes Tax Management
to deliver Federal, state and local tax updates automatically
every quarter as part of the core solution; Enterprise
Integration Tools that provide the ability to interface with
third-party applications and providers such as general ledger,
tax filing services, time clocks, banks, 401(k) and benefit
providers, check printing services and unemployment management
services; and Distributed Process Management XML Web Services
that batch and distribute HRMS/payroll processes across multiple
servers to increase efficiency, reduce the time required to
ensure processes are completed, and allow them to be initiated
over the Web.
Powered by UltiPro BSP Solution (the BSP
Solution)
Powered by UltiPro BSP Solution is designed for and
primarily marketed to business service providers that have
relationships with smaller organizations, those with fewer than
500 employees. The BSP Solution enables business service
providers to deliver Web-based workforce management and payroll
services to their customers and Web-access for their
customers employees to view their paycheck and basic
benefits information. In 2004, Ultimate Software extended its
BSP program to allow BSPs that target very large corporations to
use UltiPro as part of an HR Outsourcing offering. The very
large corporations targeted in this type of offering, generally
having more than 10,000 employees would be those that Ultimate
Softwares direct sales force would not typically see in
the sales process. Business service providers have the
opportunity to co-brand UltiPro and to price their offerings on
a per-employee-per-month or other monthly basis.
The BSP Solution has been packaged to be easy to use and
convenient for smaller companies and is appropriate for larger
companies as well. For the small company market, companies with
less than 500 employees, the BSP Solution leverages select
functionality from UltiPro Workforce Management, and have a
specially designed Web browser interface for payroll
administrators to sign up their businesses for the service,
enter employee hours worked and submit payroll. If there are no
changes to employees standard paycheck information,
submitting a payroll generally can be done in less than a minute
by clicking an icon. With changes, the process generally can
take several minutes. The initial process of registering for Web
payroll services generally takes less than an hour if the
administrator has all the appropriate data available for entry.
To ensure the process is rapid and easy for registrants, there
is a checklist online with what they need before beginning the
signup process. Through a secure, password-protected login,
employees can view their current paycheck and direct deposit
details, paycheck history, and benefits details such as medical,
dental and 401(k) deductions.
Intersourcing Offering
In 2002, the Company began offering a hosting service, branded
Intersourcing, whereby the Company provides the hardware,
infrastructure, ongoing maintenance and back-up services for its
customers at a BellSouth data center managed by IBM (the
Intersourcing Offering). Different types of hosting
arrangements include the sale of hosting services as a part of
the Intersourcing Offering, discussed below, and, to a lesser
extent, the sale of hosting services to customers that license
UltiPro on a perpetual basis (Base Hosting). Hosting
services, typically available in a shared environment, provide
Web access to comprehensive workforce management functionality
for organizations that need to simplify the information
technology (IT) support requirements of their business
applications and are priced on a per-employee-per-month basis.
In the shared environment, Ultimate Software provides an
infrastructure with applicable servers shared among many
customers who use a Web browser to access the application
software through the data center.
The Intersourcing Offering is designed to provide an appealing
pricing structure to customers who prefer to minimize the
initial cash outlay associated with typical capital
expenditures. Intersourcing customers purchase the right to use
UltiPro on an ongoing basis for a specific term in a shared or
dedicated hosted
8
environment. The pricing for Intersourcing, including both the
hosting element as well as the right to use UltiPro, is on a
per-employee-per-month basis.
Research and Development Activities
Ultimate Software incurs research and development expenses,
consisting primarily of software development personnel costs, in
the normal course of its business. Such research and development
expenses are for enhancements and future betterments to the
Companys existing products and for the development of new
products. During 2004, 2003 and 2002, the Company spent
$18.3 million, $18.2 million and $17.7 million,
respectively, on research and development activities, which
corresponds with the related amounts expensed in the
consolidated statements of operations during those periods.
There were no software costs capitalized in 2004, 2003 or 2002.
Customer Services
Ultimate Software believes that delivering quality customer
services provides the Company with a significant opportunity to
differentiate itself in the marketplace and is critical to the
comprehensive solution. Ultimate Software provides its customers
services in two broad categories: (i) professional services
which includes implementation, customer relationship management,
and educational services and (ii) customer support services
and maintenance.
Professional Services. Ultimate Softwares
professional services include implementation, customer
relationship management and educational services. Ultimate
Software believes that its implementation services are
differentiated from those of other vendors by speed,
predictability and completeness. The Company believes that its
successful record with rapid implementations is due to its
standardized methodology, long-tenured consultants, the large
amount of delivered product functionality, and comprehensive
conversion and integration tools.
Ultimate Software has an experienced team of system and
functional consultants that are dedicated to assisting customers
with rapid implementations. In addition, Ultimate Software
provides its customers with the opportunity to participate in
formal training programs conducted by its education services
team. Training programs are designed to increase customers
ability to use the full functionality of the product, thereby
maximizing the value of customers investments. Courses are
designed to align with the stages of implementation and to give
attendees hands-on experience with UltiPro. Trainees learn such
basics as how to enter new employee information, set up benefit
plans and generate standard reports, as well as more complex
processes such as defining company rules, customizing the system
and creating custom reports. The Company maintains training
facilities in Atlanta, Georgia; Schaumburg, Illinois; Dallas,
Texas; and at its headquarters in Weston, Florida. In addition
to offering classes at these facilities, the Company conducts
Web-based training and on-site training at customer facilities.
After customers have implemented UltiPro and have been turned
over to the Companys customer support and maintenance
program, the Company assigns a customer relationship manager to
the account to assist customers on an ongoing basis with special
projects, including enhancing their existing systems, managing
upgrades and writing custom reports. These services, like all of
the Companys professional services, are typically billed
on a time and materials basis.
Customer Support and Maintenance. Ultimate Software
offers comprehensive technical support and maintenance services,
which have historically been purchased by all of its customers.
Ultimate Softwares customer support center has received
the Support Center Practices Certification sponsored by the
Service Strategies Corporation (SSC) for the sixth
consecutive year. This certification recognizes companies that
deliver exceptional service and support to their
customers. Ultimate Softwares customer support
services include: software updates that reflect tax and other
legislative changes; telephone support 24 hours a day,
7 days a week; unlimited access to the Companys
employee tax center on the World Wide Web; seminars on year-end
closing procedures; and periodic newswires. In addition, the
Companys customer support services team maintains a
support Web site for its customers and individual
representatives attend user-organized user group meetings on a
routine basis throughout the United States.
9
Customers
As of December 31, 2004, Ultimate Software had licensed its
software to more than 1,200 customers that represent
approximately 5,000 companies serving in excess of
2 million employees. Ultimate Softwares customers
operate in a wide variety of industries, including
manufacturing, food services, sports, technology, finance,
insurance, retail, real estate, transportation, communications,
healthcare and services. During 2004 and 2003, one of the
Companys customers, Ceridian, accounted for 16% and 17%,
respectively, of total revenues. Ceridian did not account for
more than 10% of total revenues in 2002. No other customer
accounted for more than 10% of total revenues in 2004, 2003 or
2002.
Sales and Marketing
Ultimate Software markets and sells its products and services
through its direct sales force, marketing group, and a network
of business service provider alliances.
Direct Sales. Ultimate Softwares direct sales force
includes business development vice presidents, directors and
managers who have defined territories. The sales cycle begins
with a sales lead generated through a national, corporate
marketing campaign or a territory-based activity. In one or more
on-site visits, sales managers work with application and
technical consultants to analyze prospective client needs,
demonstrate the Companys product and, when required,
respond to RFPs (Requests for Proposals). The sale is finalized
after clients complete their internal sign-off procedures and
terms of the contract are negotiated and signed.
With a license sale, the terms of the Companys sales
contract typically include a license agreement for the product,
an annual maintenance agreement, per-day training rates and
hourly charges for implementation services. Typical payment
terms include a deposit at the time the contract is signed and
additional payments upon the occurrence of other specified
events such as the implementation of the software and/or
specific payment dates designated in the contract. Payment for
implementation and training services under the contract is
typically made as such services are provided. A service sale is
a hosting, or Intersourcing, agreement that typically requires,
but is not limited to, a per-employee-per-month fee, setup fees
and hourly charges for implementation.
Business Service Provider (BSP) Network. The BSP
network is a co-branding alliance strategy that enables BSPs to
co-brand and market UltiPro and/or the BSP Solution primarily to
businesses with fewer than 500 employees and, since 2004, is
available for very large companies, generally those having more
than 10,000 employees, as well. The goal of the program is to
extend the Companys market penetration in markets where
the Companys direct sales force does not have a
significant presence and to build a recurring revenue stream
through per-employee-per-month pricing.
Marketing. Ultimate Software supports its sales force
with a comprehensive marketing program that includes public
relations, advertising, direct mail, trade shows, seminars and
Web site maintenance. Working closely with the direct sales
force, customers and strategic partners, the marketing team
defines positioning strategies and develops a well-defined plan
for implementing these strategies. Marketing services include
market surveys and research, overall campaign management,
creative development, production control, demand generation,
results analysis, and communications with field offices,
customers and marketing partners.
Intellectual Property Rights
The Companys success is dependent in part on its ability
to protect its proprietary technology. The Company relies on a
combination of copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as
well as confidentiality agreements and licensing arrangements,
to establish and protect its proprietary rights. The Company
does not have any patents or patent applications pending, and
existing copyright, trademark and trade secret laws afford only
limited protection. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that
the Company will be able to protect its proprietary rights
against unauthorized third-party copying or use, which could
materially adversely affect the Companys business,
operating results and financial condition.
10
Despite the Companys efforts to protect its proprietary
rights, attempts may be made to copy or reverse engineer aspects
of the Companys products or to obtain and use information
that the Company regards as proprietary. Moreover, there can be
no assurance that others will not develop products that perform
comparably to the Companys proprietary products. Policing
the unauthorized use of the Companys products is
difficult. Litigation may be necessary in the future to enforce
the Companys intellectual property rights, to protect the
Companys trademarks, copyrights or trade secrets or to
determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others. Such litigation could result in substantial costs and
diversion of resources and could have a material adverse effect
on the Companys business, operating results and financial
condition.
As is common in the software industry, the Company from time to
time may become aware of third-party claims of infringement by
the Companys products of third-party proprietary rights.
While the Company is not currently subject to any such claim,
the Companys software products may increasingly be subject
to such claims as the number of products and competitors in the
Companys industry segments grows and the functionality of
products overlaps and as the issuance of software patents
becomes increasingly common. Any such claim, with or without
merit, could result in significant litigation costs and require
the Company to enter into royalty and licensing agreements,
which could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
business, operating results and financial condition. Such
royalty and licensing agreements, if required, may not be
available on terms acceptable by the Company or at all.
Competition
The market for the Companys products is highly
competitive. The Companys products compete primarily on
the basis of technology, delivered functionality and
price/performance.
Ultimate Softwares competitors include (i) large
service bureaus, primarily ADP and, to a lesser extent,
Ceridian; (ii) companies, such as PeopleSoft/ Oracle and
Kronos, that offer human resource management and payroll
(HRMS/payroll) software products for use on
mainframes, client/server environments and/or Web servers; and
(iii) the internal payroll/human resources departments of
potential customers which use custom-written software. Many of
the Companys competitors or potential competitors have
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing
resources than the Company. As a result, they may be able to
respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and to
changes in customer requirements, or to devote greater resources
to the development, promotion and sale of their products than
can the Company. In addition, current and potential competitors
have established or may establish cooperative relationships
among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability
of their products to address the needs of the Companys
prospective customers.
Product Liability
Software products such as those offered by the Company
frequently contain undetected errors or failures when first
introduced or as new versions are released. Testing of the
Companys products is particularly challenging because it
is difficult to simulate the wide variety of computing
environments in which the Companys customers may deploy
these products. Despite extensive testing, the Company from time
to time has discovered defects or errors in products. There can
be no assurance that such defects, errors or difficulties will
not cause delays in product introductions and shipments, result
in increased costs and diversion of development resources,
require design modifications or decrease market acceptance or
customer satisfaction with the Companys products or result
in claims by customers against the Company. In addition, there
can be no assurance that, despite testing by the Company and by
current and potential customers, errors will not be found after
commencement of commercial shipments, resulting in loss of or
delay in market acceptance, which could have a material adverse
effect upon the Companys business, operating results and
financial condition.
Backlog
Backlog consists of Intersourcing and Base Hosting services sold
under signed contracts for which the services have not yet been
delivered. At December 31, 2004, the Company had backlog of
$26.4 million
11
compared to $17.9 million as of December 31, 2003. The
Company expects to fill $12.4 million of the backlog during
2005. The Company does not believe that backlog is a meaningful
indicator of sales that can be expected for any future period.
There can be no assurance that backlog at any point in time will
translate into revenue in any subsequent period.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, the Company employed 456 persons,
including 65 in sales and marketing, 110 in professional
services, 158 in research and development, 61 in customer
support and 62 in finance, information technology and
administration. The Company believes that its relations with
employees are good. However, competition for qualified personnel
in the Companys industry is generally intense and the
management of the Company believes that its future success will
depend in part on its continued ability to attract, hire and
retain qualified personnel.
Available Information
The Companys Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K,
proxy statements and amendments to those reports and any
registration statements, included but not limited to,
Form S-3 are available free of charge on our Internet
website at www.ultimatesoftware.com as soon as reasonably
practicable after such reports are electronically filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Information contained on
Ultimate Softwares website is not part of this report.
Item 2. Properties
Ultimate Softwares corporate headquarters, including its
principal administrative, marketing, engineering and support
operations, are located in three adjacent office buildings in
Weston, Florida. The Company leases all the available square
footage in two buildings, or approximately 61,000 total square
feet, under two leases, each expiring in 2017. In December 2004,
the Company purchased, with available cash, all the available
square footage of an adjacent building that serves as an
extension of the Companys corporate headquarters, with
approximately 5,000 square feet. In addition, the Company
presently leases office space for its sales operations in
Albany, New York; Atlanta, Georgia; Columbia, Maryland; Dallas,
Texas; Detroit, Michigan; Millburn, New Jersey; Nashville,
Tennessee; Ridgeland, Mississippi; Seal Beach, California; and
Schaumburg, Illinois. Sales operations in other locations are
not supported by leased office space. The Company believes that
its existing facilities are suitable and adequate for its
current operations for the next 12 months. The Company
further believes that suitable space will be available as needed
to accommodate any expansion of its operations on commercially
reasonable terms.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
From time-to-time, the Company is involved in litigation
relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal
course of business. The Company is not currently a party to any
legal proceedings the adverse outcome of which, individually or
in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Companys operating results
or financial condition.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during
the fourth quarter of 2004.
12
PART II
Item 5. Market for the Registrants Common
Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
high and low sales prices of the Companys Common Stock, as
quoted on the Nasdaq National Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
14.150 |
|
|
$ |
8.500 |
|
|
$ |
4.549 |
|
|
$ |
3.060 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
14.140 |
|
|
|
9.900 |
|
|
|
5.470 |
|
|
|
3.610 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
13.250 |
|
|
|
9.710 |
|
|
|
10.190 |
|
|
|
4.900 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
13.950 |
|
|
|
11.670 |
|
|
|
10.690 |
|
|
|
8.020 |
|
As of February 18, 2005, the Company had approximately 167
holders of record, representing approximately 2,700 stockholder
accounts.
The Company has never declared or paid any cash dividends on its
capital stock and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends
in the foreseeable future. The Company currently intends to
retain future earnings to fund the development and growth of its
business. The payment of dividends in the future, if any, will
be at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Under the terms
of the Companys revolving line of credit with Silicon
Valley Bank, the Company may not pay dividends without the prior
written consent of Silicon Valley Bank. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources.
13
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected consolidated financial data is qualified
by reference to and should be read in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Conditions and Results of Operations and the
Companys Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The statement
of operations data presented below for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2004 and the balance
sheet data as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 have been
derived from the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K, which have
been audited by KPMG LLP whose report appears elsewhere in this
Form 10-K. The statement of operations data below for the
years ended December 31, 2001 and December 2000 and the
balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000
have been derived from audited consolidated financial statements
not included herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
2000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring
|
|
$ |
39,049 |
|
|
$ |
29,344 |
|
|
$ |
19,345 |
|
|
$ |
14,364 |
|
|
$ |
10,520 |
|
|
Services
|
|
|
24,924 |
|
|
|
23,478 |
|
|
|
23,634 |
|
|
|
28,289 |
|
|
|
27,331 |
|
|
License
|
|
|
8,055 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
12,170 |
|
|
|
16,826 |
|
|
|
24,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
72,028 |
|
|
|
60,416 |
|
|
|
55,149 |
|
|
|
59,479 |
|
|
|
61,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring
|
|
|
11,961 |
|
|
|
9,495 |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
|
|
5,789 |
|
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
Services
|
|
|
18,448 |
|
|
|
17,277 |
|
|
|
18,267 |
|
|
|
20,219 |
|
|
|
20,978 |
|
|
License
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
1,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
31,402 |
|
|
|
27,579 |
|
|
|
27,528 |
|
|
|
27,295 |
|
|
|
27,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
20,630 |
|
|
|
17,788 |
|
|
|
17,479 |
|
|
|
18,261 |
|
|
|
20,121 |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
18,317 |
|
|
|
18,229 |
|
|
|
17,675 |
|
|
|
12,775 |
|
|
|
15,687 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,806 |
|
|
|
5,871 |
|
|
|
6,890 |
|
|
|
10,065 |
|
|
|
7,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
45,753 |
|
|
|
41,888 |
|
|
|
42,044 |
|
|
|
41,101 |
|
|
|
43,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(5,127 |
) |
|
|
(9,051 |
) |
|
|
(14,423 |
) |
|
|
(8,917 |
) |
|
|
(8,413 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
Interest and other income
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(5,024 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,169 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,568 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,750 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,404 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share basic and diluted(1)
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.90 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.55 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted(1)
|
|
|
21,743 |
|
|
|
18,738 |
|
|
|
16,189 |
|
|
|
15,944 |
|
|
|
16,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
14,766 |
|
|
$ |
13,783 |
|
|
$ |
8,974 |
|
|
$ |
8,464 |
|
|
$ |
7,572 |
|
Investments in marketable securities
|
|
|
10,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
52,546 |
|
|
|
35,812 |
|
|
|
31,143 |
|
|
|
34,251 |
|
|
|
34,440 |
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
28,476 |
|
|
|
24,610 |
|
|
|
27,815 |
|
|
|
20,215 |
|
|
|
9,894 |
|
Long-term borrowings, including capital lease obligations
|
|
|
1,231 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
Stockholders equity (deficit)
|
|
|
13,524 |
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
(7,368 |
) |
|
|
4,590 |
|
|
|
13,904 |
|
|
|
(1) |
See Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for information regarding the computation of net loss
per share. |
14
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion of the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company contains certain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These
forward-looking statements represent the Companys
expectations or beliefs, including, but not limited to,
statements concerning the Companys operations and
financial performance and condition. Words such as
anticipates, expects,
intends, plans, believes,
seeks, estimates, and similar
expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees
of future performance and are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that are difficult to predict. The Companys
actual results could differ materially from those contained in
the forward-looking statements due to risks and uncertainties
associated with fluctuations in the Companys quarterly
operating results, concentration of the Companys product
offerings, development risks involved with new products and
technologies, competition, the Companys contractual
relationships with third parties, contract renewals with
business partners, compliance by our customers with the terms of
their contracts with us, and other factors disclosed in the
Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Other factors that may cause such differences
include, but are not limited to, those discussed in this
Form 10-K, including Exhibit 99.1 hereto. The Company
undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise.
Executive Summary
Ultimate Softwares UltiPro Workforce Management Software
(UltiPro) is a Web-based solution designed to
deliver the functionality businesses need to manage the employee
life cycle, from recruiting and hiring to compensating and
managing benefits to terminating, whether their processes are
centralized at headquarters or distributed across multiple
divisions or branch offices. The Companys main sources of
revenues include sales from the Intersourcing Offering (defined
below), sales of perpetual software licenses for UltiPro (and
the related annual maintenance) and sales of services (mostly
implementation) related to both Intersourcing and license sales.
In the past, the Companys primary business strategy was
centered on sales of perpetual software licenses of UltiPro. In
an effort to reduce the volatility and unpredictable nature of a
business strategy predominantly focused on license sales, the
Company introduced Intersourcing as an additional revenue source
during 2002.
In 2002, Ultimate Software began offering hosting services,
branded Intersourcing by the Company, whereby
Ultimate Software provides the hardware, infrastructure, ongoing
maintenance and back-up services for its customers at a
BellSouth data center managed by IBM. Intersourcing is designed
to appeal to those customers that want to minimize their
internal technology support requirements for the application and
hardware.
After the introduction of Intersourcing in mid-2002, the sales
mix gradually began to shift towards Intersourcing, especially
during 2003 and continuing in 2004. Management believes the
shift in sales mix helps to produce a more predictable revenue
stream by providing recurring revenue and cash from
Intersourcing over the related contract periods, typically
24 months. As Intersourcing units are sold, the recurring
revenue backlog associated with Intersourcing grows, enhancing
the predictability of future revenue streams. For the last six
months of 2003, the sales mix for number of units sold began
shifting to favor Intersourcing units over license units, with
this shift continuing into 2004. During the year ended
December 31, 2004, the sales mix (for new units sold) was
comprised of approximately 60% Intersourcing units and 40%
license units, which reflected a higher concentration of new
Intersourcing units sold compared to the same period of 2003,
when the sales mix (for new units sold) was comprised of 55%
Intersourcing units and 45% license units. The Company expects
the sales mix composition to continue to favor Intersourcing
during 2005.
The financial impact of the shift (from sales of license units
to a combination of sales of license units and Intersourcing
units) relates to (1) the type of revenue recognized and
the timing of recognition; (2) the amount of services
revenue recognized; and (3) the timing of cash received
from the sale.
15
When an Intersourcing unit is sold instead of a license unit,
license revenue is replaced with recurring revenue. The license
revenue which would otherwise have been recognized upfront
(assuming all required accounting criteria are met) is replaced
with recurring revenue recognized over the contract term
(typically 24 months) with such recurring revenue
recognition commencing when the customer runs its first
live payroll (i.e., generally between four and six
months from the date of sale). The total revenue from the sale
of an average Intersourcing unit sold is usually no less than it
would have been if it were a license sale, with the main
difference pertaining to the period of recognition (i.e., being
spread over a period of time rather than 100% upfront).
In addition to the change in type of revenue and the timing of
revenue recognition, implementation revenue (a component of
services revenue) is also impacted by the shift in sales mix to
Intersourcing. On average, an Intersourcing unit takes less time
to implement than a license unit. Therefore, as the sales mix
shifts towards Intersourcing, billable hours for the
Companys implementation services per unit typically
decrease.
Cash is also impacted when an Intersourcing unit is sold instead
of a license unit. For a typical license unit sale, the cash due
for the license and the first year of annual maintenance is
received within 9 months from the contract date. However,
when an Intersourcing unit is sold, the cash due from the
Intersourcing sale is received over the course of the contract
term, typically 24 months. The total cash received from the
sale of an average Intersourcing unit sold is usually no less
than it would have been if it were a license sale with the main
difference pertaining to the period of time in which it is
received.
While making the transition from a business model focused solely
on sales of perpetual licenses to a business model that includes
both license sales and Intersourcing sales, the Company raised
additional capital in 2004 and 2003 to address expected cash
needs related to the transition. In May 2004, capital from a
private placement of the Companys common stock, par value
$0.01 per share (the Common Stock), totaling
$14.4 million, net of stock issuance costs, was raised to
provide cash to fund future operations based on the
Companys anticipated growth in Intersourcing sales. In
2003, capital from private placements of the Companys
Common Stock, totaling $17.5 million, net of stock issuance
costs, was raised to fund 2003 operations (including the impact
of the transition toward more sales of Intersourcing units) and
to provide cash to fund future operations based on the
Companys anticipated growth in Intersourcing sales.
As a result of the Companys recent transition to a sales
mix favoring Intersourcing units, a key financial metric used by
the Company in measuring future financial performance is new
annual recurring revenues. New annual recurring
revenues represent the expected one-year value from (i) new
Intersourcing sales from the Companys hosted model
(including prorated one-time charges); (ii) maintenance
revenues related to new license sales; (iii) recurring
revenues from new business service providers; and
(iv) recurring revenues from additional sales to Ultimate
Softwares existing client base. New annual recurring
revenues attributable to sales during 2004 were
$12.0 million as compared to $9.2 million for 2003.
Another major component of recurring revenues is subscription
revenues generated from the Companys business service
provider (BSP) channel. The BSP contributing the
most revenues from the BSP Channel during each of 2004, 2003 and
2002 was Ceridian Corporation (Ceridian) under the
Original Ceridian Agreement (defined below). See also
OverviewOriginal Ceridian Agreement.
As previously disclosed, Ultimate Software and Ceridian signed
an agreement in 2001, as amended, granting Ceridian a
non-exclusive license to use UltiPro software as part of an
on-line offering for Ceridian to market primarily to businesses
with less than 500 employees (the Original Ceridian
Agreement). Ceridian marketed that solution under the name
SourceWeb. During December 2004, RSM McGladrey Employer Services
(RSM) an existing business service provider of
Ultimate Softwares, acquired Ceridians SourceWeb
HR/payroll and self-service product and existing SourceWeb base
of small and midsize business customers throughout the United
States (the RSM Acquisition). The financial terms of
the Original Ceridian Agreement have not changed as a result of
the RSM Acquisition. Ceridian will continue to be financially
obligated to pay Ultimate Software a minimum fee of $500,000 per
month with increases of 5% per annum, compounded beginning in
January 2006. The aggregate minimum payments that Ceridian is
obligated to pay Ultimate Software under the Original Ceridian
Agreement over the minimum term of the agreement
16
are $42.7 million. To date, Ceridian has paid to Ultimate
Software a total of $23.0 million under the Original
Ceridian Agreement. Ultimate Software expects to continue to
recognize a minimum of $642,000 per month in recurring
subscription revenues from the Original Ceridian Agreement until
its termination. The earliest date that this agreement can be
terminated by either party is March 9, 2008 (except for an
uncured material breach). The amount of subscription revenue, a
component of recurring revenues, recognized under the Original
Ceridian Agreement in 2004, totaling $7.7 million, was the
same as that recognized in 2003.
During 2004 and 2003, Ultimate Software entered into services
agreements, as amended and extended from time to time,
(individually, the Ceridian Services Agreement and
collectively, the Ceridian Services Agreements),
with Ceridian. Under the Ceridian Services Agreements, Ceridian
was obligated to pay Ultimate Software a total of
$3.3 million and $2.3 million in 2004 and 2003,
respectively, payable in equal quarterly installments, in
exchange for additional services provided by Ultimate Software
during the term of the agreements. The 2003 Ceridian Services
Agreement expired effective December 31, 2003 and was
recognized on a straight-line basis from February 10, 2003
through December 31, 2003. The 2004 Ceridian Services
Agreement, as extended from time to time during 2004, expired on
December 31, 2004 and was recognized on a straight-line
basis from January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
The Company offers and provides certain services to other BSPs.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Sources of revenue for the Company include:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of perpetual licenses for UltiPro; |
|
|
|
Sales of perpetual licenses for UltiPro in conjunction with
services to host the UltiPro application (Hosting
Services); |
|
|
|
Sales of the right to use UltiPro through
Intersourcing (the Intersourcing
Offering), which includes Hosting Services; |
|
|
|
Sales of Hosting Services on a stand-alone basis to customers
who already own a perpetual license or are simultaneously
acquiring a perpetual license for UltiPro (Base
Hosting); |
|
|
|
Sales of services including implementation, training and other
services, including the provision of payroll-related forms and
the printing of Form W-2s for certain customers, as
well as services provided to BSPs, including Ceridian through
December 31, 2004 pursuant to the Ceridian Services
Agreements; and |
|
|
|
Recurring revenues derived from (1) maintenance revenues
generated from maintaining, supporting and providing periodic
updates for the Companys software and
(2) subscription revenues generated from
per-employee-per-month (PEPM) fees earned through
the Intersourcing Offering, Base Hosting and the BSP sales
channel, as well as revenues generated from the Original
Ceridian Agreement. |
Perpetual Licenses for UltiPro Sold With or Without Hosting
Services
Sales of perpetual licenses for UltiPro and sales of perpetual
licenses for UltiPro in conjunction with Hosting Services are
multiple-element arrangements that involve the sale of software
and consequently fall under the guidance of Statement of
Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition, for revenue recognition.
17
The Company licenses software under non-cancelable license
agreements and provides services including maintenance, training
and implementation consulting services. In accordance with the
provisions of SOP 97-2, license revenues are generally
recognized when (1) a non-cancelable license agreement has
been signed by both parties, (2) the product has been
shipped, (3) no significant vendor obligations remain and
(4) collection of the related receivable is considered
probable. To the extent any one of these four criteria is not
satisfied, license revenue is deferred and not recognized in the
consolidated statements of operations until all such criteria
are met.
For multiple-element software arrangements, each element of the
arrangement is analyzed and the Company allocates a portion of
the total fee under the arrangement to the elements based on
vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value of the element
(VSOE), regardless of any separate prices stated
within the contract for each element. Fair value is considered
the price a customer would be required to pay when the element
is sold separately.
The Residual Method (as defined below) is used to recognize
revenue when a license agreement includes one or more elements
to be delivered at a future date and VSOE of the fair value of
all undelivered elements exists. The fair value of the
undelivered elements is determined based on the historical
evidence of stand-alone sales of these elements to third
parties. Undelivered elements in a license arrangement typically
include maintenance, training and implementation services (the
Standard Undelivered Elements). The fair value for
maintenance fees is based on the price of the services sold
separately, which is determined by the annual renewal rate
historically and consistently charged to customers (the
Maintenance Valuation). Maintenance fees are
generally priced as a percentage of the related license fee. The
fair value for training services is based on standard pricing
(i.e., rate per training day charged to customers for class
attendance), taking into consideration stand-alone sales of
training services through year-end seminars and historically
consistent pricing for such services (the Training
Valuation). The fair value for implementation services is
based on standard pricing (i.e., rate per hour charged to
customers for implementation services), taking into
consideration stand-alone sales of implementation services
through special projects and historically consistent pricing for
such services (the Implementation Valuation). Under
the residual method (the Residual Method), the fair
value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining
portion of the arrangement fee attributable to the delivered
element, the license fee, is recognized as revenue. If VSOE for
one or more undelivered elements does not exist, the revenue is
deferred on the entire arrangement until the earlier of the
point at which (i) such VSOE does exist or (ii) all
elements of the arrangement have been delivered.
Perpetual licenses of UltiPro sold without Hosting Services
typically include a license fee and the Standard Undelivered
Elements. Fair value for the Standard Undelivered Elements is
based on the Maintenance Valuation, the Training Valuation and
the Implementation Valuation. The delivered element of the
arrangement, the license fee, is accounted for in accordance
with the Residual Method.
Perpetual licenses of UltiPro sold with Hosting Services
typically include a license fee, the Standard Undelivered
Elements and Hosting Services. Fair value for the Standard
Undelivered Elements is based on the Maintenance Valuation, the
Training Valuation and the Implementation Valuation. Hosting
Services are delivered to customers on a PEPM basis over the
term of the related customer contract (Hosting PEPM
Services). Upfront fees charged to customers represent
fees for the hosting infrastructure, including hardware costs,
third-party license fees and other upfront costs incurred by the
Company in relation to providing such services (Hosting
Upfront Fees). Hosting PEPM Services and Hosting Upfront
Fees (collectively, Hosting Services) represent
undelivered elements in the arrangement since their delivery is
over the course of the related contract term. The fair value for
Hosting Services is based on standard pricing (i.e., rate
charged per-employee-per-month), taking into consideration
stand-alone sales of Hosting Services through the sale of such
services to existing customers (i.e., those who already own the
UltiPro perpetual license at the time Hosting Services are sold
to them) and historically consistent pricing for such services
(the Hosting Valuation). The delivered element of
the arrangement, the license fee, is accounted for in accordance
with the Residual Method.
The Companys customer contracts are non-cancelable
agreements. The Company does not provide for rights of return or
price protection on its software. The Company provides a limited
warranty that its software
18
will perform in accordance with user manuals for varying
periods, which are generally less than one year from the
contract date. The Companys customer contracts generally
do not include conditions of acceptance. However, if conditions
of acceptance are included in a contract or uncertainty exists
about customer acceptance of the software, license revenue is
deferred until acceptance occurs.
Sales Generated from the Intersourcing Offering
Subscription revenues generated from the Intersourcing Offering
are recognized in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements
with Multiple Deliverables as a services arrangement since
the customer is purchasing the right to use UltiPro rather than
licensing the software on a perpetual basis. Fair value of
multiple elements in Intersourcing arrangements is assigned to
each element based on the guidance provided by EITF 00-21.
The elements that typically exist in Intersourcing arrangements
include hosting services, the right to use UltiPro, maintenance
of UltiPro (i.e., product enhancements and customer support) and
professional services (i.e., implementation services and
training in the use of UltiPro). The pricing for hosting
services, the right to use UltiPro and maintenance of UltiPro is
bundled (the Bundled Elements). Since these three
Bundled Elements are components of recurring revenues in the
consolidated statements of operations, allocation of fair values
to each of the three elements is not necessary and they are not
reported separately. Fair value for the Bundled Elements, as a
whole, is based upon evidence provided by the Companys
pricing for Intersourcing arrangements sold separately. The
Bundled Elements are provided on an ongoing basis and represent
undelivered elements under EITF 00-21; they are recognized on a
monthly basis as the services are performed, once the customer
has begun to process payrolls used to pay its employees (i.e.,
goes Live).
Implementation and training services (the Professional
Services) provided for Intersourcing arrangements are
priced on a time and materials basis and are recognized as
services revenue in the consolidated statements of operations as
the services are performed. Under EITF 00-21, fair value is
assigned to service elements in the arrangement based on their
relative fair values, using the prices established when the
services are sold on a stand-alone basis. Fair value for
Professional Services is based on the respective Training
Valuation and Implementation Valuation. If evidence of the fair
value of one or more undelivered elements does not exist, the
revenue is deferred and recognized when delivery of those
elements occurs or when fair value can be established. The
Company believes that applying EITF 00-21 to Intersourcing
arrangements as opposed to applying SOP 97-2 is appropriate
given the nature of the arrangements whereby the customer has no
right to the UltiPro license.
Sales of Base Hosting Services
Subscription revenues generated from Base Hosting are recognized
in accordance with EITF 00-3, Application of AICPA
Statement of Position 97-2 to Arrangements that Include the
Right to Use Software that Stored on Another Entitys
Hardware, which provides guidance as to the application of
SOP 97-2 to hosting arrangements that include a license right to
the software. The elements that typically exist for Base Hosting
arrangements include hosting services and implementation
services. Base Hosting is different than Intersourcing
arrangements in that the customer already owns a perpetual
license or is purchasing a perpetual license for UltiPro and is
purchasing hosting services subsequently in a separate
transaction whereas, with Intersourcing, the customer is
purchasing the right to use (not license) UltiPro.
Implementation services provided for Base Hosting arrangements
are substantially less than those provided for Intersourcing
arrangements since UltiPro is already implemented in Base
Hosting arrangements and only needs to be transitioned to a
hosted environment. Fair value for hosting services is based on
the Hosting Valuation. The fair value for implementation
services is based on standard pricing (i.e., rate per hour
charged to customers for implementation services), taking into
consideration stand-alone sales of implementation services
through special projects and historically consistent pricing for
such services (the Implementation Valuation). Fair
value for implementation services is assigned in accordance with
guidelines provided by SOP 97-2 based on the Implementation
Valuation.
19
Services, including Implementation and Training Services
Services revenues include revenues from fees charged for the
implementation of the Companys software products and
training of customers in the use of such products, fees for
other services, including those related to the Ceridian Services
Agreements through December 31, 2004, the provision of
payroll-related forms and the printing of Form W-2s
for certain customers, as well as certain reimbursable
out-of-pocket expenses. Revenues for training and implementation
consulting services are recognized as services are performed.
Other services are recognized as the product is shipped or as
the services are rendered depending on the specific terms of the
arrangement.
Arrangement fees related to fixed-fee implementation services
contracts are recognized using the percentage of completion
accounting method, which involves the use of estimates.
Percentage of completion is measured at each reporting date
based on hours incurred to date compared to total estimated
hours to complete. If a sufficient basis to measure the progress
towards completion does not exist, revenue is recognized when
the project is completed or when we receive final acceptance
from the customer.
Recurring Revenues
Recurring revenues include maintenance revenues and subscription
revenues. Maintenance revenues are derived from maintaining,
supporting and providing periodic updates for the Companys
software. Subscription revenues are principally derived from
PEPM fees earned through the Intersourcing Offering, Base
Hosting and the BSP sales channel, as well as revenues generated
from the Original Ceridian Agreement. Maintenance revenues are
recognized ratably over the service period, generally one year.
Maintenance and support fees are generally priced as a
percentage of the initial license fee for the underlying
products. To the extent there are upfront fees associated with
the Intersourcing Offering, Base Hosting or the BSP sales
channel, subscription revenues are recognized ratably over the
term of the related contract upon the delivery of the product
and services. In the cases of Intersourcing and Base Hosting
sales, amortization of the upfront fees commences when the
customer processes its first Live payroll, which typically
occurs four to six months after the sale, and extends until the
end of the contract period. In the case of BSP channel sales,
amortization of the upfront fee typically commences when the
contract is signed, which is when the BSPs rights under
the agreement begin, continuing until the contract term ends.
PEPM fees from the Intersourcing Offering, Base Hosting and the
BSP sales channel are recognized as subscription revenue as the
services are delivered. Commencing on August 28, 2002,
subscription revenues generated from the Original Ceridian
Agreement are recognized ratably over the minimum term of the
contract, which is expected to extend until March 9, 2008
(7 years from the effective date of the Original Ceridian
Agreement). Subscription revenues of $642,000 per month are
based on guaranteed minimum payments from Ceridian of
approximately $42.7 million over the minimum contract term,
including $23.0 million received to date.
Maintenance services provided to customers include product
updates and technical support services. Product updates are
included in general releases to the Companys customers and
are distributed on a periodic basis. Such updates may include,
but are not limited to, product enhancements, payroll tax
updates, additional security features or bug fixes. All features
provided in general releases are unspecified upgrade rights. To
the extent specified upgrade rights or entitlements to future
products are included in a multi-element arrangement, revenue is
recognized upon delivery provided fair value for the elements
exists. In multi-element arrangements that include a specified
upgrade right or entitlement to a future product, if fair value
does not exist for all undelivered elements, revenue for the
entire arrangement is deferred until all elements are delivered
or when fair value can be established.
Subscription revenues generated from the BSP sales channel
include both the right to use UltiPro and maintenance. The BSP
is charged a fee on a per-employee-per-month basis and, in
several cases, is subject to a guaranteed monthly minimum amount
for the term of the related agreement. Revenue is recognized on
a per-employee-per-month basis. To the extent the BSP pays the
Company a one-time upfront fee, the Company accounts for such
fee by recognizing it as subscription revenue over the minimum
term of the related agreement.
20
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the Securities
Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements (SAB No. 101)
and the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104,
Revenue Recognition
(SAB No. 104). Management believes the
Company is currently in compliance in all material aspects with
the current provisions set forth in SOP 97-2, SOP 98-9, EITF
00-21, EITF 00-3, SAB No. 101 and
SAB No. 104.
Concentration of Revenues
During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, Ceridian
accounted for 15.5% and 16.6%, respectively, of total revenues.
Ceridian did not account for more than 10% of total revenues in
2002. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of total
revenues in the periods presented. Due to the significant
concentration of total revenues with this single customer, the
Company has exposure if this customer loses its credit
worthiness. The Ceridian Services Agreements, under which
services revenues were recognized in 2004 and 2003, have
terminated and no further services revenues will be recognized
with respect to them. See Note 3 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
The composition of the revenues recognized from Ceridian, as a
percentage of total revenues, for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring revenues
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Services revenues
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts at an
amount estimated to be sufficient to provide adequate protection
against losses resulting from collecting less than full payment
on accounts receivable. In assessing the adequacy of the
allowance for doubtful accounts, the Company considers multiple
factors including historical bad debt experience, the general
economic environment, and the aging of its receivables. A
considerable amount of judgment is required when the realization
of receivables is assessed, including assessing the probability
of collection and current credit-worthiness of each customer. If
the financial condition of the Companys customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make
payments, an additional provision for doubtful accounts may be
required.
Overview
Ultimate Software designs, markets, implements and supports
payroll and workforce management solutions.
Ultimate Softwares UltiPro Workforce Management Software
(UltiPro) is a Web-based solution designed to
deliver the functionality businesses need to manage the employee
life cycle, from recruiting and hiring to compensating and
managing benefits to terminating, whether their processes are
centralized at headquarters or distributed across multiple
divisions or branch offices. UltiPros human resources
(HR) and benefits management functionality is wholly
integrated with a flexible payroll engine, reporting and
analytical decision-making tools, and a self-service Web portal
for executives, managers, administrators, and employees to
review and update work-related and personal information.
Ultimate Software believes that UltiPro helps customers
streamline HR and payroll processes to significantly reduce
administrative and operational costs, while also empowering
executives and staff to access critical information quickly and
perform routine business activities efficiently.
UltiPro is marketed both through the Companys direct sales
team as well as through alliances with business service
providers (BSPs) that market co-branded UltiPro to
their customer bases. Ultimate Softwares direct sales team
focuses primarily on companies with more than 500 employees and
sells both a license model (typically in-house) and a service
model (typically hosted and priced on a per-employee-per-
21
month basis). The Companys BSP alliances focus primarily
on companies with under 500 employees and, since 2004, very
large companies, generally those with over 10,000 employees, as
well. The Companys BSP alliances typically sell an
Internet solution, which includes UltiPro, priced on a
monthly/service basis. When the BSP sells its Internet solution,
incorporating UltiPro in the offering, the BSP is obligated to
remit a fee to the Company, typically measured on a
per-employee-per-month basis and, in some cases, subject to a
guaranteed monthly minimum amount.
The Companys direct sales force markets UltiPro as an
in-house human resources, payroll and workforce management
solution and alternatively as a hosted offering branded
Intersourcing (the Intersourcing
Offering). Intersourcing provides Web access to
comprehensive workforce management functionality for
organizations that need to simplify the information technology
(IT) support requirements of their business
applications. Ultimate Software believes that Intersourcing is
attractive to companies that want to focus on their core
competencies to increase sales and profits. Through the
Intersourcing model introduced in 2002, the Company provides the
hardware, infrastructure, ongoing maintenance and backup
services for its customers at a BellSouth data center managed by
International Business Machines (IBM).
Intersourcing Offering
In 2002, the Company began offering a hosting service, branded
Intersourcing, whereby the Company provides the hardware,
infrastructure, ongoing maintenance and back-up services for its
customers at a BellSouth data center, which is managed by IBM.
Different types of hosting arrangements include the sale of
hosting services as a part of the Intersourcing Offering,
discussed below, and, to a lesser extent, the sale of hosting
services to customers that license UltiPro on a perpetual basis.
Hosting services, typically available in a shared environment,
provide Web access to comprehensive workforce management
functionality for organizations that need to simplify the IT
support requirements of their business applications and are
priced on a per-employee-per-month basis. In the shared
environment, Ultimate Software provides an infrastructure with
applicable servers shared among many customers who use a Web
browser to access the application software through the data
center.
The Intersourcing Offering is designed to provide an appealing
pricing structure to customers who prefer to minimize the
initial cash outlay associated with typical capital
expenditures. Intersourcing customers purchase the right to use
UltiPro on an ongoing basis for a specific term, typically in a
shared environment. The pricing for Intersourcing, including
both the hosting element as well as the right to use UltiPro, is
on a per-employee-per-month basis.
Original Ceridian Agreement
During 2001, Ultimate Software and Ceridian reached an
agreement, as amended in 2002, which granted Ceridian a
non-exclusive license to use UltiPro software as part of an
on-line offering that Ceridian can market primarily to
businesses with under 500 employees (the Original Ceridian
Agreement). Ceridian marketed that solution under the name
SourceWeb.
Under the agreement, Ceridian is responsible for all marketing
costs and expenses, and must sell the licensed software on a per
period, per employee, per paycheck basis or other repetitive
payment model. Ceridian is required to pay the Company a monthly
license fee based on the number of employees paid using the
licensed software. These payments are subject to a minimum
monthly payment of $500,000 per month with increases of 5% per
annum, compounded beginning in January 2006. The maximum monthly
payment is $1.0 million, subject to increases of 5% per
annum, compounded. The aggregate minimum payments that Ceridian
is obligated to pay Ultimate Software under the Original
Ceridian Agreement over the minimum term of the agreement is
$42.7 million. To date, Ceridian has paid to Ultimate
Software a total of $23.0 million under the Original
Ceridian Agreement. The earliest date upon which the Ceridian
Agreement can be terminated by either party (except for an
uncured material breach) is March 9, 2008, resulting in an
expected minimum term of 7 years. Ceridian retains certain
rights to use the software upon termination.
During December 2004, RSM McGladrey Employer Services
(RSM), an existing business service provider of
Ultimate Softwares, acquired Ceridians SourceWeb
HR/payroll and self-service product and
22
existing SourceWeb base of small and midsize business customers
throughout the United States (the RSM Acquisition).
The financial terms of the Original Ceridian Agreement have not
changed as a result of the RSM Acquisition. Ceridian will
continue to be financially obligated to pay Ultimate Software a
minimum fee of $500,000 per month with increases of 5% per
annum, compounded beginning in January 2006. Ultimate Software
expects to continue to recognize a minimum of $642,000 per month
in recurring subscription revenues from the Original Ceridian
Agreement until its termination.
Ceridian Services Agreements
On April 7, 2004, the Company and Ceridian extended their
services agreement, which expired on December 31, 2003 (the
Extended Ceridian Services Agreement). Under the
Extended Ceridian Services Agreement, which was effective
January 1, 2004 through September 30, 2004, Ceridian
was obligated to pay Ultimate Software a total of
$2.5 million in three equal installments in exchange for
services provided by Ultimate Software during the term of that
agreement. All three installment payments due under the Extended
Services Agreement were received by the Company through July
2004. During October 2004, the Extended Ceridian Services
Agreement was further extended until December 31, 2004 for
a fee of $0.8 million, received in a single installment in
November 2004. Services revenue from the Extended Ceridian
Services Agreement was recognized on a straight-line basis from
January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004. The
Extended Ceridian Services Agreement expired on
December 31, 2004 and was not renewed. The Company offers
and provides certain services to other BSPs.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth the Statements of Operations data
of the Company, as a percentage of total revenues, for the
periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring
|
|
|
54.2 |
% |
|
|
48.6 |
% |
|
|
35.1 |
% |
|
Services
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
License
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
Services
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
License
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
45.6 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
63.5 |
|
|
|
69.3 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(7.1) |
|
|
|
(14.9) |
|
|
|
(26.2) |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(0.3) |
|
|
|
(0.4) |
|
|
|
(0.5) |
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(7.0 |
)% |
|
|
(15.1 |
)% |
|
|
(26.4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2004 and
2003
Revenues
The Companys revenues are derived from three principal
sources: recurring revenues, services revenues and software
licenses (license revenues).
Recurring revenues include annual maintenance on software
license agreements for the Companys products and
subscription revenues. Maintenance revenues are derived from
maintaining, supporting and providing periodic updates for the
Companys software. Subscription revenues are principally
derived from per-employee-per-month (PEPM) fees
earned through the Intersourcing Offering, Base Hosting and the
BSP sales channel, as well as revenues generated from the
Original Ceridian Agreement. Maintenance revenues are recognized
ratably over the service period, generally one year. To the
extent there are upfront fees associated with the Intersourcing
Offering, Base Hosting or the BSP sales channel, subscription
revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the related
contract upon the delivery of the product and services. PEPM
fees from the Intersourcing Offering, Base Hosting and the BSP
sales channel are recognized as subscription revenues as the
services are delivered. All of the Companys customers that
purchased software during 2004 and 2003 also purchased
maintenance and support service contracts. Maintenance and
support fees are generally priced as a percentage of the initial
license fee for the underlying products.
Services revenues include revenues from fees charged for the
implementation of the Companys software products and
training of customers in the use of such products, fees for
services provided to BSPs, including those related to the
Ceridian Services Agreement (which expired on December 31,
2004), the provision of payroll-related forms and the printing
of Form W-2s for certain customers and certain
reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses. Revenues for training and
implementation consulting services are recognized as services
are performed. Revenues for the Ceridian Services Agreement were
recognized ratably based on the terms of the agreement, from
January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004. Other
services are recognized as the product is shipped or as the
services are rendered.
License revenues include revenues from software license
agreements for the Companys products, entered into between
the Company and its customers in which the license fees are
non-cancelable. License revenues are generally recognized upon
the delivery of the related software product when all
significant contractual obligations have been satisfied. Until
such delivery, the Company records amounts received when
contracts are signed as customer deposits which are included
with deferred revenues in the consolidated balance sheets.
Total revenues, consisting of recurring, services and license
revenues, increased 19.2% to $72.0 million for 2004 from
$60.4 million for 2003.
Recurring revenues increased 33.1% to $39.0 million for
2004 from $29.3 million for 2003 primarily due to a total
increase of $6.5 million in revenues generated from the
Intersourcing Offering resulting from incremental Intersourcing
units sold and an increase in the number of Intersourcing
customers that processed their first live payroll during 2004
combined with additional maintenance revenues generated from
incremental licenses sold. Recurring subscription revenues
recognized in 2004 from the Original Ceridian Agreement,
totaling $7.7 million, were the same as in 2003. Beginning
on August 28, 2002, subscription revenues generated from
the Original Ceridian Agreement of $642,000 per month have been
recognized, and are expected to be recognized, over the minimum
term of the contract. The earliest date upon which the Ceridian
Agreement can be terminated by either party (except for an
uncured material breach) is March 9, 2008, resulting in an
expected minimum term of 7 years. Future recurring revenues
to be recognized from the Original Ceridian Agreement are
expected to be comparable to 2004, or $7.7 million per year
through March 9, 2008. The impact on recurring revenues for
units sold under the Intersourcing Offering (as opposed to the
impact on license revenues for licensed units sold) is expected
to be gradual, based on the revenue recognition of the
Intersourcing fees over the terms of the related contracts. The
Company believes that a combination of units sold under the
Intersourcing Offering and regular licensed units sold will
provide a more predictable business model in the future.
Services revenues increased 6.2% to $24.9 million for 2004
from $23.5 million for 2003 primarily as a result of an
increase of $1.1 million in services revenue generated from
the Extended Ceridian Services
24
Agreement and an increase of $0.5 million in implementation
revenues, partially offset by a decrease of $0.3 million in
certain reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses.
License revenues increased 6.1% to $8.0 million for 2004
from $7.6 million for 2003 primarily due to a higher
average selling price in 2004 as unit sales were comparable.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues consists of the cost of recurring, services and
license revenues. Cost of recurring revenues consists of costs
to provide maintenance and technical support to the
Companys customers, the cost of providing periodic updates
and the cost of subscription revenues, including amortization of
capitalized software. Cost of services revenues primarily
consists of costs to provide implementation services and
training to the Companys customers and, to a lesser
degree, costs related to sales of payroll-related forms, costs
associated with certain reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses,
discussed below, and costs to support additional services
provided to BSPs. Cost of license revenues primarily consists of
fees payable to a third-party for software products distributed
by the Company and, to a lesser degree, amortization of
capitalized software costs. UltiPro includes third-party
software for enhanced report writing purposes. When UltiPro
licenses are sold, customers pay the Company on a per user basis
for the license rights to the third-party report writing
software. Capitalized software is amortized using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the
related asset, which is typically three years.
Cost of recurring revenues increased 26.0% to $12.0 million
for 2004 from $9.5 million for 2003. The $2.5 million
increase in cost of recurring revenue for 2004 was attributable
to additional costs associated with the growth in the
Intersourcing Offering, including labor costs, depreciation and
amortization of related computer equipment and costs associated
with the BellSouth data center. As a percentage of recurring
revenues, cost of recurring revenues decreased to 30.6% for 2004
from 32.4% for 2003 primarily due to the absorption of these
expenses in an expanded recurring revenue base.
Cost of services revenues increased 6.8% to $18.4 million
for 2004 from $17.3 million for 2003 primarily as a result
of increased costs to provide additional services to BSPs,
principally labor-related, and higher implementation and
training costs, partially offset by a decrease in certain
reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses. Cost of services revenues,
as a percentage of services revenues, increased to 74.0% for
2004 from 73.6% for 2003 primarily as a result of higher
expenses.
Cost of license revenues increased 23% to $1.0 million for
2004 from $0.8 million for 2003. The increase in cost of
license revenues for 2004 was due to increased labor costs and
additional third-party royalty fees, partially offset by a
reduction in the amortization of capitalized software.
Capitalized software impacting the cost of license revenues were
fully amortized as of July 31, 2004. As a percentage of
license revenues, cost of license revenues increased to 12.3%
for 2004 from 10.6% for 2003 primarily as a result of a
disproportionate increase in the cost of licenses in comparison
to the increase in the license revenue base. Cost of license
revenues, as a percentage of license revenues, generally
fluctuates from period to period principally due to the mix of
sales of software products which generate third-party license
fees in each period and fluctuations in revenues contrasted with
fixed expenses such as labor costs and the amortization of
capitalized software.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and
benefits, sales commissions, travel and promotional expenses,
and facility and communication costs for direct sales offices,
as well as advertising and marketing costs. Sales and marketing
expenses increased 16.0% to $20.6 million for 2004 from
$17.8 million for 2003. The increase in sales and marketing
expenses was primarily due to a $2.3 million increase in
labor costs and, to a lesser extent, an increase in advertising
and marketing costs of $0.5 million. The main contributing
factors for the increase in labor costs in 2004 were sales
commissions and salaries, benefits and travel costs. The
increase in sales commissions was predominantly related to the
increase in recurring revenues from Intersourcing, which are
amortized over the initial term of the contracts, usually two
years, commencing when the customer processes its first Live
payroll. The addition of personnel to the sales infrastructure
during
25
the three months ended September 30, 2003 was the primary
cause for the increase in salaries, benefits and travel costs in
2004.
Research and Development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of software
development personnel costs. Research and development expenses
of $18.3 million in 2004 were consistent with expenses of
$18.2 million in 2003 with 2004 labor costs increasing
slightly over 2003.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and benefits of executive, administrative and financial
personnel, as well as external professional fees and the
provision for doubtful accounts. General and administrative
expenses increased 15.9% to $6.8 million for 2004 from
$5.9 million for 2003 primarily due to an increase of
$0.6 million principally related to additional external
professional fees associated with Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404
compliance and an increase of $0.2 million in the provision
for doubtful accounts.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased 17.6% to $182,000 for 2004 from
$221,000 for 2003 primarily due to the reduction in borrowings
from the Credit Facility, defined below.
Interest and Other Income
Interest and other income increased 176.7% to $285,000 for 2004
from $103,000 for 2003 primarily due to interest income on cash
available for investments.
Provision for Income Taxes
No provision or benefit for Federal, state or foreign income
taxes was made for 2004 due to the operating losses and
operating loss carryforwards from prior periods incurred in the
respective periods. Net operating loss carryforwards available
at December 31, 2004, expiring at various times through the
year 2024 and which are available to offset future taxable
income, were $62.9 million. The timing and levels of future
profitability may result in the expiration of net operating loss
carryforwards before utilization. Additionally, utilization of
such net operating losses may be limited as a result of
cumulative ownership changes in the Companys equity
instruments.
Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2003 and
2002
Revenues
Total revenues, consisting of recurring, services and license
revenues, increased to $60.4 million for 2003 from
$55.1 million for 2002.
Recurring revenues increased 51.7% to $29.3 million for
2003 from $19.3 million for 2002 primarily due to an
increase of $5.0 million in subscription revenues
recognized under the Original Ceridian Agreement, and a
$4.7 million increase in recurring revenues generated from
the Intersourcing Offering resulting from additional
Intersourcing units sold and maintenance revenues generated from
incremental licenses sold. During 2003, there was an increase of
$5.0 million in recurring revenues from the Original
Ceridian Agreement in comparison to 2002. This increase was a
result of the duration of revenue recognition in 2003 versus
2002 in 2003, a full year of recurring revenues was
recognized whereas in 2002 slightly more than four months of
recurring revenues was recognized. Beginning on August 28,
2002, subscription revenues generated from the Original Ceridian
Agreement of $642,000 per month have been, and are expected to
be, recognized over the minimum term of the contract, which is
expected to extend until March 9, 2008. Future recurring
revenues to be recognized from the Original Ceridian Agreement
are expected to be comparable to 2003, or $7.7 million per
year, through March 9, 2008.
26
Services revenues decreased 0.7% to $23.5 million for 2003
from $23.6 million for 2002 primarily as a result of a
decrease in implementation revenues of $2.7 million
primarily resulting from fewer billable hours in 2003
principally caused by the shift towards Intersourcing units,
which generally require less time to implement than license
units, partially offset by an increase of $2.3 million in
services revenue generated from the Ceridian Services Agreement,
which were recognized ratably from February 10, 2003
through December 31, 2003.
License revenues decreased 37.6% to $7.6 million for 2003
from $12.2 million for 2002. The decrease in license
revenues was due to the combination of fewer license units sold,
principally due to a shift in targeted sales (i.e., a sales mix
which includes more Intersourcing units sold), and a decrease in
sales of UltiPro to existing clients using the Companys
discontinued DOS-based product, UltiPro for Lan (DOS
Clients). In the second half of 2002, the Company adjusted
its sales and marketing strategy to include sales from its
Intersourcing Offering, which produces subscription revenues (a
component of recurring revenues) rather than license revenues.
In 2003, more units were sold from the Intersourcing Offering
than in the prior year. In addition, sales of the UltiPro
product to DOS Clients ended during the last fiscal quarter of
2002, shortly before support for UltiPro for Lan was
discontinued (in January 2003). Prior to discontinuing support,
the Company actively marketed the UltiPro product to DOS Clients
as part of a loyalty program designed to encourage these clients
to purchase UltiPro before support for UltiPro for Lan was
discontinued. More than half of the DOS Clients converted to the
UltiPro product in 2002.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of recurring revenues increased 17.3% to $9.5 million
for 2003 from $8.1 million for 2002. The $1.4 million
increase in cost of recurring revenue for 2003 was primarily
attributable to additional costs associated with the
Intersourcing Offering, including depreciation and amortization
of related computer equipment and costs associated with the
BellSouth data center, and higher costs of maintenance revenues
principally due to increased labor costs, including benefits. As
a percentage of recurring revenues, cost of recurring revenues
decreased to 32.4% for 2003 from 41.9% for 2002 primarily due to
the absorption of these expenses in an expanded recurring
revenue base.
Cost of services revenues decreased 5.4% to $17.3 million
for 2003 from $18.3 million for 2002. The decrease was due
to a decrease of $0.7 million in costs of implementation,
principally from lower third-party consultant fees and, to a
lesser extent, a reduction in performance-based bonuses paid to
Ultimate Softwares consultants in 2003. Cost of services
revenues, as a percentage of services revenues, decreased to
73.6% for 2003 from 77.3% for 2002 primarily as a result of
lower expenses.
Cost of license revenues decreased 30.6% to $0.8 million
for 2003 from $1.2 million for 2002. The decrease in cost
of license revenues for 2003 was due to lower third-party
royalty fees resulting from fewer licensed units sold and a
reduction in the amortization of capitalized software. As a
percentage of license revenues, cost of license revenues
increased to 10.6% for 2003 from 9.6% for 2002 primarily as a
result of a decreased license revenue base. Cost of license
revenues, as a percentage of license revenues, generally
fluctuates from period to period principally due to the mix of
sales of software products which generate third-party license
fees in each period and fluctuations in revenues contrasted with
fixed expenses such as labor costs and the amortization of
capitalized software.
Sales and Marketing
Sales and marketing expenses increased 1.8% to
$17.8 million for 2003 from $17.5 million for 2002.
The increase in sales and marketing expenses was primarily due
to a $0.8 million increase in labor costs, excluding sales
commissions, and an increase in advertising and marketing costs
of $0.2 million, partially offset by a decrease of
$0.7 million attributable to lower sales commissions tied
to the decrease in license revenues. The addition of personnel
to the sales infrastructure during the three months ended
September 30, 2003 was the main contributing factor for the
increase in labor costs in 2003.
27
Research and Development
Research and development expenses increased 3.1% to
$18.2 million for 2003 from $17.7 million for 2002.
The increase in 2003 was due to increased labor costs of
$0.8 million principally resulting from increased benefit
costs and additional personnel costs incurred as a result of the
June 2003 acquisition of substantially all of the assets of
Hireworks, Inc., a software company that developed, marketed and
supported an Internet recruitment solution.
General and Administrative
General and administrative expenses decreased 14.8% to
$5.9 million for 2003 from $6.9 million for 2002
primarily due to a $1.4 million reduction in the provision
for doubtful accounts, partially offset by increased labor costs
of $0.5 million. The provision for doubtful accounts
decreased to $0.2 million for 2003 from $1.7 million
in 2002. This decrease was primarily attributable to three
factors: (1) a decrease of $1.6 million in the balance
of accounts receivable, gross of the allowance for doubtful
accounts; (2) a decrease of $2.4 million in individual
accounts charged-off during 2003 as compared to 2002; and
(3) a decrease of $0.5 million in the allowance for
doubtful accounts. The balance of gross accounts receivable
declined principally due to a shift in targeted sales (i.e., a
sales mix which includes more Intersourcing units sold).
Intersourcing units typically have a shorter payment period than
license units. Charge-offs were lower in 2003 due to the
improvement in the quality of composition of the Companys
accounts receivable portfolio. The allowance for doubtful
accounts decreased as a result of the combination of the lower
gross accounts receivable balance and the improvement of the
quality of the composition of the accounts receivable portfolio
in 2003 as compared to 2002.
Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased 21.9% to $221,000 for 2003 from
$283,000 for 2002 primarily due to the payoff of outstanding
borrowings under the Credit Facility (defined below) during
September 2003.
Interest and Other Income
Interest and other income decreased 25.4% to $103,000 for 2003
from $138,000 for 2002 primarily due to the reduction in funds
available for investment during the first half of 2003.
Provision for Income Taxes
No provision or benefit for Federal, state or foreign income
taxes was made for 2003 due to the operating losses and
operating loss carryforwards from prior periods incurred in the
respective periods. Net operating loss carryforwards available
at December 31, 2003, expiring at various times through the
year 2023 and which are available to offset future taxable
income, were $56.6 million. The timing and levels of future
profitability may result in the expiration of net operating loss
carryforwards before utilization. Additionally, utilization of
such net operating losses may be limited as a result of
cumulative ownership changes in the Companys equity
instruments.
Quarterly Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain unaudited quarterly
results of operations for each of the quarters in the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. In managements
opinion, this unaudited information has been prepared on the
same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements and
includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the
information for the quarters presented. This information should
be read in conjunction with the Companys Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes thereto, included elsewhere in
this Form 10-K.
The Companys quarterly revenues and operating results have
varied significantly in the past and are likely to vary
substantially from quarter to quarter in the future. The
Companys operating results may fluctuate as a result of a
number of factors, including, but not limited to, increased
expenses (especially as they
28
relate to product development and sales and marketing), timing
of product releases, increased competition, variations in the
mix of revenues, announcements of new products by the Company or
its competitors and capital spending patterns of the
Companys customers. The Company establishes its
expenditure levels based upon its expectations as to future
revenues, and, if revenue levels are below expectations,
expenses can be disproportionately high. A drop in near term
demand for the Companys products could significantly
affect both revenues and profits in any quarter. Operating
results achieved in previous fiscal quarters are not necessarily
indicative of operating results for the full fiscal years or for
any future periods. As a result of these factors, there can be
no assurance that the Company will be able to establish or, when
established, maintain profitability on a quarterly basis. The
Company believes that, due to the underlying factors for
quarterly fluctuations, period-to-period comparisons of its
operations are not necessarily meaningful and that such
comparisons should not be relied upon as indications of future
performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
Sep. 30, |
|
Jun. 30, |
|
Mar. 31, |
|
Dec. 31, |
|
Sep. 30, |
|
Jun. 30, |
|
Mar. 31, |
|
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring
|
|
$ |
11,068 |
|
|
$ |
10,075 |
|
|
$ |
9,207 |
|
|
$ |
8,699 |
|
|
$ |
8,005 |
|
|
$ |
7,364 |
|
|
$ |
7,114 |
|
|
$ |
6,861 |
|
|
Services
|
|
|
6,907 |
|
|
|
6,079 |
|
|
|
6,129 |
|
|
|
5,809 |
|
|
|
6,667 |
|
|
|
5,440 |
|
|
|
5,043 |
|
|
|
6,328 |
|
|
License
|
|
|
2,533 |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
1,811 |
|
|
|
2,506 |
|
|
|
2,064 |
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
20,508 |
|
|
|
18,165 |
|
|
|
17,450 |
|
|
|
15,905 |
|
|
|
16,483 |
|
|
|
15,310 |
|
|
|
14,221 |
|
|
|
14,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring
|
|
|
3,019 |
|
|
|
3,103 |
|
|
|
2,957 |
|
|
|
2,882 |
|
|
|
2,624 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
2,275 |
|
|
|
2,291 |
|
|
Services
|
|
|
5,051 |
|
|
|
4,283 |
|
|
|
4,457 |
|
|
|
4,657 |
|
|
|
4,744 |
|
|
|
4,041 |
|
|
|
4,057 |
|
|
|
4,435 |
|
|
License
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
8,232 |
|
|
|
7,674 |
|
|
|
7,684 |
|
|
|
7,812 |
|
|
|
7,513 |
|
|
|
6,528 |
|
|
|
6,569 |
|
|
|
6,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
5,380 |
|
|
|
5,158 |
|
|
|
5,261 |
|
|
|
4,831 |
|
|
|
4,991 |
|
|
|
4,499 |
|
|
|
4,209 |
|
|
|
4,089 |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
4,414 |
|
|
|
4,805 |
|
|
|
4,543 |
|
|
|
4,555 |
|
|
|
4,566 |
|
|
|
4,807 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
|
4,329 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
1,669 |
|
|
|
1,458 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
1,480 |
|
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
11,579 |
|
|
|
11,857 |
|
|
|
11,473 |
|
|
|
10,844 |
|
|
|
11,037 |
|
|
|
10,786 |
|
|
|
10,029 |
|
|
|
10,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
(1,366 |
) |
|
|
(1,707 |
) |
|
|
(2,751 |
) |
|
|
(2,067 |
) |
|
|
(2,004 |
) |
|
|
(2,377 |
) |
|
|
(2,603 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Interest and other income
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
815 |
|
|
$ |
(1,331 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,743 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,765 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,077 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,020 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,436 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,636 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
22,447 |
|
|
|
22,353 |
|
|
|
21,479 |
|
|
|
20,680 |
|
|
|
20,550 |
|
|
|
20,110 |
|
|
|
17,515 |
|
|
|
16,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
25,221 |
|
|
|
22,353 |
|
|
|
21,479 |
|
|
|
20,680 |
|
|
|
20,550 |
|
|
|
20,110 |
|
|
|
17,515 |
|
|
|
16,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings (loss) per share: Basic
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.13 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.14 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company has historically funded operations primarily through
the private and public sale of equity securities and, to a
lesser extent, equipment financing and borrowing arrangements.
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had $25.3 million
in cash, cash equivalents and investments in marketable
securities, reflecting a net increase of $11.5 million
since December 31, 2003. As of December 31, 2004, the
Company had working capital of $3.7 million as compared to
a working capital deficit of $5.2 million as of
December 31, 2003. The increase in working capital resulted
primarily from the additional equity raised in 2004, partially
offset by the funding of operations.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.3 million
for 2004 as compared to net cash used in operating activities of
$8.7 million for 2003. The increase in net cash provided by
operating activities was primarily due to cash received from
Ceridian of $5.5 million, in accordance with the payment
terms of the
29
Original Ceridian Agreement, partially offset by an increase in
accounts receivable. In February 2002, the Company received
$6.0 million from Ceridian as a prepayment by Ceridian of
minimum guaranteed payments for 2003 due to the Company pursuant
to the Original Ceridian Agreement, as amended from time to
time, and the Company received $0.5 million in September
2002 for the early delivery of the general release, UltiPro 6.0
(also known as Evolution). During 2003, the Company
did not receive any cash from Ceridian under the Original
Ceridian Agreement. Guaranteed minimum payments from Ceridian
under the Original Ceridian Agreement of $500,000 per month
resumed effective January 1, 2004. As of the date of this
Form 10-K, the Company has received $1.0 million from
Ceridian during 2005 pursuant to the payment terms of the
Original Ceridian Agreement. In addition, during 2004, the
Company received an additional $0.8 million from Ceridian
pursuant to the Extended Ceridian Services Agreement, which
expired on December 31, 2004.
Net cash used in investing activities was $15.3 million for
2004 as compared to $2.3 million for 2003. The increase in
net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to
investing in marketable securities available-for-sale and an
increase in purchases of property and equipment, including
additional equipment purchases associated with the Intersourcing
operations and the cash purchase in December 2004 of a 5,000
square foot building adjacent to the Companys headquarters
which is being used to accommodate the growth in the
Companys operations, partially offset by decrease in
acquisitions.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $16.0 million
for 2004 as compared to $15.8 million for 2003. The
increase in net cash provided by financing activities in 2004 as
compared to 2003 was primarily related to increased borrowings
under the equipment line of the Credit Facility, partially
offset by a $1.6 million decrease in net proceeds from
issuances of the Companys common stock, $0.01 par value
per share (Common Stock) due to the combination of
lower net proceeds from private sales of Common Stock and higher
net proceeds from exercises of options to purchase Common Stock.
For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company had net
borrowings of $0.4 million under the equipment line under
the Credit Facility whereas in the year ended December 31,
2003, the Company had net repayments of $1.3 million under
the Credit Facility.
Days sales outstanding, calculated on a trailing three-month
basis (DSO), as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
were 57 days and 52 days, respectively. The increase
in DSOs as of December 31, 2004 was the result of an
increase in accounts receivable attributable to higher license
sales and certain BSP sales.
Deferred revenue was $28.5 million at December 31,
2004 as compared to $24.6 million at December 31,
2003. The increase of $3.9 million in deferred revenue was
primarily due to the combination of higher deferred
Intersourcing revenues which are recognized over the term of the
related contract and higher deferred revenue from several new
BSP sales which are also recognized over the related contract
term, partially offset by non-cash amortization of
$1.7 million under the Original Ceridian Agreement.
On May 12, 2004, the Company entered into a definitive
agreement to sell 1,398,182 newly issued shares of its Common
Stock to three institutional investors in a private placement
for gross proceeds of approximately $15.4 million (the
Recent Capital Raised). These shares of Common Stock
were sold at $11.00 per share. After deducting commissions and
other stock issuance costs, the Company received approximately
$14.4 million. The Company is using the net proceeds from
the Recent Capital Raised for general corporate purposes,
including working capital and funding the Companys
transition from a license model to a business model with a
higher percentage of recurring revenues. The Company filed a
registration statement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-115894)
covering resales of the Common Stock by investors, which
registration statement was declared effective on June 25,
2004.
On July 16, 2003, the Company sold 2,200,000 newly issued
shares of its Common Stock to two institutional investors in a
private placement for gross proceeds of approximately
$11.7 million. These shares of Common Stock were sold at
$5.30 per share. After deducting commissions and other stock
issuance costs, the Company received approximately
$10.6 million. The Company filed a registration statement
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form S-3
(Registration No. 333-107527) covering resales of the
Common Stock by investors, which registration statement was
declared effective on December 9, 2003.
30
Certain other shareholders exercised their right to include
shares owned by them in such registration statement on
Form S-3.
In addition to the July 16, 2003 private placement, during
2003 the Company sold an aggregate of 1,708,000 newly issued
shares of Common Stock and warrants to purchase 170,800 shares
of Common Stock at $4 per share to a group of investors,
including Ceridian and some existing shareholders, for gross
proceeds of $6.8 million.
The Companys primary motive for raising additional capital
in 2004 and 2003 was to fund the transition in its business
model which shifts some of its UltiPro unit sales to
Intersourcing. Management believes the shift in sales mix helps
to produce a more predictable revenue stream by providing
recurring revenue and cash from Intersourcing over the related
contract periods, typically 24 months. As Intersourcing
units are sold, the recurring revenue backlog associated with
Intersourcing grows, providing visibility for the future and
enhancing the predictability of future revenue streams.
In November 2001, the Company entered into a $5.0 million
revolving line of credit (the Credit Facility) with
Silicon Valley Bank. The Credit Facility, as amended, expires on
May 27, 2005 and bears interest at a rate equal to Prime
Rate plus 1.0% per annum (reduced to Prime Rate plus 0.5% per
annum upon two consecutive quarters of net profitability, as
defined). The Credit Facility provides working capital financing
for up to 75% of the Companys eligible accounts receivable
not to exceed $3.0 million (the Revolving
Note), as defined, stand-by letters of credit for up to
$0.5 million as a component of the Revolving Note and
financing for eligible equipment purchases for up to
$2.0 million with additional limits for software purchases
(the Equipment Term Note). The Equipment Term Note
is payable in 36 equal monthly installments, plus interest at
Prime Rate plus 1%. The maximum amount available under the
Credit Facility is $5.0 million. At December 31, 2004,
$4.5 million was available for borrowing under the Credit
Facility with $0.4 million outstanding under the Equipment
Term Note.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by all of the
Companys corporate assets, including a negative pledge on
intellectual property, and the Company is required to comply
with certain financial and other covenants. Under the terms of
the Credit Facility, the Company may not pay dividends without
the prior written consent of Silicon Valley Bank. The material
covenants require that the Company maintain, on a monthly basis,
a minimum quick ratio (representing the ratio of current assets
to current liabilities, excluding deferred revenue) of 1.75 to
1.0 and certain quarterly revenue levels as of the end of each
quarter, as provided in the Credit Facility, as amended. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all
covenants included in the terms of the Credit Facility.
The Company believes that cash and cash equivalents and cash
generated from operations will be sufficient to fund its
operations for at least the next 12 months. This belief is
based upon, among other factors, managements expectations
for future revenue growth, controlled expenses and collections
of accounts receivable.
Recent Accounting Literature
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R), which replaces
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123) and supercedes
APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. SFAS 123R requires all share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on
their fair values and the recording of such expense in the
consolidated statements of income. The accounting provisions of
SFAS 123R are effective for reporting periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. The pro forma disclosures previously
permitted under SFAS 123, no longer will be an alternative
to financial statement recognition. The Company is required to
adopt SFAS 123R in the third quarter of fiscal 2005. Under
SFAS 123R, the Company must determine the appropriate fair
value model to be used for valuing share-based payments, the
amortization method for compensation cost and the transition
method to be used at date of adoption. The Company is evaluating
the requirements of SFAS 123R and expects that the adoption
of SFAS 123R will have a material impact on the
consolidated results of operations and earnings per share. The
Company has not yet determined the method of adoption or the
effect
31
of adopting SFAS 123R, and has not determined whether the
adoption will result in amounts that are similar to the current
pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123 in Note 2 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised Interpretation
No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,
an interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51, (FIN 46R).
FIN 46R requires the consolidation of entities in which an
enterprise absorbs a majority of the entitys expected
losses, receives a majority of the entitys expected
residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual
or other financial interests in the entity. Currently entities
are generally consolidated by an enterprise when it has a
controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority
voting interest in the entity. The provisions of FIN 46R
are generally effective for existing (prior to February 1,
2003) variable interest relationships of a public entity no
later than the end of the first reporting period that ends after
March 15, 2004. However, prior to the required application
of this interpretation a public entity that is not a small
business issuer shall apply FIN 46R to those entities that
are considered to be special-purpose entities no later than the
end of the first reporting period that ends after
December 15, 2003. The adoption of FIN 46R did not
have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements (as
that term is defined in applicable SEC rules) that are
reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on
the Companys financial condition, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Contractual Obligations
As of December 31, 2004, the Companys outstanding
contractual cash obligations were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
1-3 |
|
4-5 |
|
After 5 |
|
|
Total |
|
1 Year |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations (1)
|
|
$ |
1,967 |
|
|
$ |
990 |
|
|
$ |
824 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other long-term obligations (2)
|
|
|
17,167 |
|
|
|
1,775 |
|
|
|
3,208 |
|
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
9,216 |
|
Purchase obligations (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities (4)
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$ |
19,583 |
|
|
$ |
2,765 |
|
|
$ |
4,481 |
|
|
$ |
3,121 |
|
|
$ |
9,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The Company leases certain equipment under non-cancellable
agreements, which are accounted for as capital leases and expire
at various dates through 2006. See Note 9 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding
capital lease obligations. |
|
(2) |
The Company leases corporate office space and certain equipment
under non-cancellable operating lease agreements expiring at
various dates. See Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for information regarding operating lease
obligations. |
|
(3) |
Purchase orders or contracts for the purchase of goods and
services are not included in the table above. The Company is not
able to determine the aggregate amount of such purchase orders
that represent contractual obligations, as purchase orders may
represent authorizations to purchase rather than binding
agreements. The Company does not have significant agreements for
the purchase of goods or services specifying minimum quantities
or set prices. |
|
(4) |
The Company has a $5.0 million revolving line of credit
(the Credit Facility) that expires on May 27,
2005. As of December 31, 2004, $0.4 million was
outstanding under the Equipment Term Note of the Credit
Facility, of which $0.3 million is classified as long-term.
See Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for information regarding long-term debt. There were
no other long-term liabilities, other than those referred to in
the table above, which were payable in cash. Other long-term
liabilities in |
32
|
|
|
the Companys consolidated balance sheet as of
December 31, 2004 include deferred revenues which do not
represent obligations payable in cash. See Note 2 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information
regarding deferred revenues. |
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk
In the ordinary course of its operations, the Company is exposed
to certain market risks, primarily interest rates. Uncertainties
that are either non-financial or non-quantifiable, such as
political, economic, tax, other regulatory or credit risks are
not included in the following assessment of the Companys
market risks.
Market risks. The Company manages market risk in
accordance with its investment guideline objectives, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum safety of principal |
|
|
|
Maintenance of appropriate liquidity for regular cash needs |
|
|
|
Maximum yields in relationship to guidelines and market
conditions |
|
|
|
Diversification of risks |
|
|
|
Fiduciary control of all investments |
The Company targets its portfolio to have maturities of
twenty-four months or less. Investments are held to enhance the
preservation of capital and not for trading purposes.
Interest rates. Cash equivalents consist of money market
accounts with original maturities of less than three months.
Short-term investments include obligations of U.S. government
agencies and corporate debt securities with ratings of at least
doubleA by Moodys or Standard and Poor, which limits
credit risk.
Interest on the Credit Facility, as amended, which expires on
May 28, 2005, is based on Prime Rate plus 1.0% per annum
(reduced to Prime Rate plus 0.5% per annum upon two consecutive
quarters of net profitability, as defined). As of
December 31, 2004, $4.5 million was available for
borrowing under the Credit Facility with $0.4 million
outstanding under the Equipment Term Note. As of
December 31, 2004, total investments in marketable
securities were $10.5 million. Changes in amounts borrowed
or interest rates could impact the Companys anticipated
interest income from interest-bearing cash accounts, or cash
equivalents, investments in marketable securities, as well as
interest expense on borrowings under the Credit Facility.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page(s) |
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
34 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
35 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
36 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
37 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
38 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
39 |
|
33
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
The Ultimate Software Group, Inc. and subsidiary (the
Company) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004.
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility
of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements
based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
and the results of their operations and their cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report
dated March 10, 2005, expressed an unqualified opinion on
managements assessment of, and the effective operation of,
internal control over financial reporting.
Miami, Florida
March 10, 2005
34
THE ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
share data) |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
14,766 |
|
|
$ |
13,783 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$500 and $525 for 2004 and 2003, respectively
|
|
|
12,600 |
|
|
|
9,292 |
|
Short-term investments in marketable securities
|
|
|
8,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
3,114 |
|
|
|
2,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
38,583 |
|
|
|
25,784 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
9,512 |
|
|
|
7,188 |
|
Capitalized software, net
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
Long-term investments in marketable securities
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
|
1,928 |
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
52,546 |
|
|
$ |
35,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
2,202 |
|
|
$ |
2,549 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
6,015 |
|
|
|
5,378 |
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
25,591 |
|
|
|
22,277 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
34,906 |
|
|
|
31,022 |
|
Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
|
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue, net of current portion
|
|
|
2,885 |
|
|
|
2,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
39,022 |
|
|
|
34,151 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $.01 par
value, 500,000 shares authorized, no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized, no
shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized,
22,749,363 and 20,843,935 shares issued in 2004 and 2003,
respectively
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
103,643 |
|
|
|
86,760 |
|
|
Accumulated comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(89,277 |
) |
|
|
(84,253 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,578 |
|
|
|
2,715 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 257,647 shares
|
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
13,524 |
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$ |
52,546 |
|
|
$ |
35,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these financial statements.
35
THE ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring
|
|
$ |
39,049 |
|
|
$ |
29,344 |
|
|
$ |
19,345 |
|
|
Services
|
|
|
24,924 |
|
|
|
23,478 |
|
|
|
23,634 |
|
|
License
|
|
|
8,055 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
12,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
72,028 |
|
|
|
60,416 |
|
|
|
55,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring
|
|
|
11,961 |
|
|
|
9,495 |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
|
Services
|
|
|
18,448 |
|
|
|
17,277 |
|
|
|
18,267 |
|
|
License
|
|
|
993 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
31,402 |
|
|
|
27,579 |
|
|
|
27,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
20,630 |
|
|
|
17,788 |
|
|
|
17,479 |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
18,317 |
|
|
|
18,229 |
|
|
|
17,675 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
6,806 |
|
|
|
5,871 |
|
|
|
6,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
45,753 |
|
|
|
41,888 |
|
|
|
42,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(5,127 |
) |
|
|
(9,051 |
) |
|
|
(14,423 |
) |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(182 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
Interest and other income
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(5,024 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,169 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted
|
|
|
21,743 |
|
|
|
18,738 |
|
|
|
16,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these financial statements.
36
THE ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
Additional |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
Stockholders |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Capital |
|
Loss |
|
Deficit |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2001
|
|
|
16,106 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
65,808 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(60,516 |
) |
|
|
211 |
|
|
$ |
(863 |
) |
|
$ |
4,590 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,568 |
) |
Issuances of Common Stock from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
Issuance of Common Stock from private placement
|
|
|
675 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,700 |
|
Non-cash issuances of options to Board to purchase Common Stock
for board fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
Purchase of Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2002
|
|
|
16,788 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
68,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75,084 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
(7,368 |
) |
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,169 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,169 |
) |
Issuances of Common Stock from exercise of stock options and
warrant
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
572 |
|
Issuance of Common Stock for private placement
|
|
|
3,908 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
17,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,494 |
|
Non-cash issuances of options to Board to purchase Common Stock
for board fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
20,844 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
86,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,253 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
(1,054 |
) |
|
|
1,661 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,024 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,024 |
) |
Unrealized loss on investments in marketable securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of Common Stock from exercise of stock options and
warrants
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,292 |
|
Issuance of Common Stock for private placement
|
|
|
1,398 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,333 |
|
Non-cash issuances of options to Board to purchase Common Stock
for board fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141 |
|
Non-cash compensation expense for stock option modifications
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
22,749 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
$ |
103,643 |
|
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
(89,277 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
|
$ |
(1,054 |
) |
|
$ |
13,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these financial statements.
37
THE ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$ |
(5,024 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,169 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,568 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used
in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
5,055 |
|
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
5,838 |
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
Non-cash issuances of options to Board to purchase Common Stock
for board fees
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense for stock option modifications
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(3,727 |
) |
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
1,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
(1,436 |
) |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
(471 |
) |
|
|
(838 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
3,866 |
|
|
|
(3,205 |
) |
|
|
7,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
(8,690 |
) |
|
|
2,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of marketable securities
|
|
|
(10,560 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(4,695 |
) |
|
|
(1,953 |
) |
|
|
(4,263 |
) |
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(15,255 |
) |
|
|
(2,303 |
) |
|
|
(4,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(1,116 |
) |
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
(1,876 |
) |
|
Net proceeds from issuances of Common Stock
|
|
|
16,625 |
|
|
|
18,066 |
|
|
|
2,717 |
|
|
Net borrowings (repayments) under Credit Facility
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
(1,346 |
) |
|
|
1,346 |
|
|
Purchases of Treasury Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
15,958 |
|
|
|
15,802 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
4,809 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
13,783 |
|
|
|
8,974 |
|
|
|
8,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$ |
14,766 |
|
|
$ |
13,783 |
|
|
$ |
8,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing
activities: |
The Company entered into capital lease obligations
to acquire new equipment totaling $1,382, $1,404 and $1,007 in
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively |
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
are an integral part of these financial statements.
38
THE ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS
The Ultimate Software Group, Inc. (Ultimate Software
or the Company) designs, markets, implements and
supports payroll and workforce management solutions, marketed
primarily to middle-market organizations with 500 to 15,000
employees. The Company reaches its customer base and target
market through its direct sales force and a network of national,
regional and local strategic partners.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiary, Ultimate Benefits, Inc., an
inactive company. Intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid instruments with an original maturity of three
months or less when acquired are considered cash equivalents and
are comprised of interest-bearing accounts.
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable are principally from end-users of the
Companys products. The Company performs credit evaluations
of its customers and has recorded allowances for estimated
losses. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts
at an amount estimated to be sufficient to provide adequate
protection against losses resulting from collecting less than
full payment on accounts receivables. A considerable amount of
judgment is required when the realization of receivables is
assessed, including assessing the probability of collection and
current credit-worthiness of each customer. If the financial
condition of the Companys customers were to deteriorate,
resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, an
additional provision for doubtful accounts may be required.
Investments in Marketable Securities
The Company classifies its investments in marketable securities
with readily determinable fair values as securities
available-for-sale in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (FAS
115). The Company has classified all investments as
available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities consist of
debt and equity securities not classified as trading securities
nor as securities to be held to maturity. Unrealized holding
gains and losses on securities available-for-sale are reported
as a net amount in accumulated other comprehensive loss in
stockholders equity until realized. Gains and losses on
the sale of securities available-for-sale are determined using
the specific identification method.
39
The amortized cost and market value of the Companys
investments in available-for-sale securities at
December 31, 2004 are shown in the table below. There were
no such investments held at December 31, 2003 or during the
fiscal year then ended (in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Market |
|
|
Cost |
|
Gain |
|
Loss |
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in marketable securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government obligations
|
|
$ |
5,863 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
5,857 |
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
4,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government obligations
|
|
|
3,631 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,632 |
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,151 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments, available-for-sale
|
|
$ |
16,711 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
16,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of the
available-for-sale securities by contractual maturity at
December 31, 2004 are shown below (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
Estimated |
|
|
Cost |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$ |
14,261 |
|
|
$ |
14,255 |
|
Due after one year
|
|
|
2,450 |
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
16,711 |
|
|
$ |
16,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment is stated at cost, net of accumulated
depreciation and amortization. Property and equipment is
depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets, which range from two to twenty
years. Leasehold improvements and assets under capital leases
are amortized over the shorter of the life of the asset or the
term of the lease over periods ranging from two to fifteen
years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when
incurred; betterments are capitalized. Upon the sale or
retirement of assets, the cost, accumulated depreciation and
amortization are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss
is recognized.
Revenue Recognition
Sources of revenue for the Company include:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of perpetual licenses for UltiPro Workforce Management
Software (UltiPro), a Web-based solution designed to
deliver the functionality businesses need to manage the employee
life cycle, whether their processes are centralized at
headquarters or distributed across multiple divisions or branch
offices; |
|
|
|
Sales of perpetual licenses for UltiPro in conjunction with
services to host the UltiPro application (Hosting
Services); |
|
|
|
Sales of the right to use UltiPro, including Hosting Services
(the Intersourcing Offering); |
|
|
|
Sales of Hosting Services on a stand-alone basis to customers
who already own a perpetual license or are simultaneously
acquiring a perpetual license for UltiPro (Base
Hosting); |
|
|
|
Sales of other services including implementation, training and
other services, including the provision of payroll-related forms
and the printing of Form W-2s for certain customers,
as well as services provided |
40
|
|
|
|
|
to business service providers (BSPs) in 2004 and
2003,principally Ceridian Corporation (Ceridian)
pursuant to the Ceridian Services Agreements (defined below); and |
|
|
|
Recurring revenues derived from (1) maintenance revenues
generated from maintaining, supporting and providing periodic
updates for the Companys software and
(2) subscription revenues generated from
per-employee-per-month (PEPM) fees earned through
the Intersourcing Offering, Base Hosting and the business
service provider (BSP) sales channel, as well as
revenues generated from the Original Ceridian Agreement (defined
below). |
Perpetual Licenses for UltiPro Sold With or Without Hosting
Services
Sales of perpetual licenses for UltiPro and sales of perpetual
licenses for UltiPro in conjunction with Hosting Services are
multiple-element arrangements that involve the sale of software
and consequently fall under the guidance of Statement of
Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition, for revenue recognition.
The Company licenses software under non-cancelable license
agreements and provides services including maintenance, training
and implementation consulting services. In accordance with the
provisions of SOP 97-2 license revenues are generally
recognized when (1) a non-cancelable license agreement has
been signed by both parties, (2) the product has been
shipped, (3) no significant vendor obligations remain and
(4) collection of the related receivable is considered
probable. To the extent any one of these four criteria is not
satisfied, license revenue is deferred and not recognized in the
consolidated statement of operations until all such criteria are
met.
For multiple-element software arrangements, each element of the
arrangement is analyzed and the Company allocates a portion of
the total fee under the arrangement to the elements based on
vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value of the element
(VSOE), regardless of any separate prices stated
within the contract for each element. Fair value is considered
the price a customer would be required to pay when the element
is sold separately.
The residual method is used to recognize revenue when a license
agreement includes one or more elements to be delivered at a
future date and VSOE of the fair value of all undelivered
elements exists. The fair value of the undelivered elements is
determined based on the historical evidence of stand-alone sales
of these elements to third parties. Undelivered elements in a
license arrangement typically include maintenance, training and
implementation services (the Standard Undelivered
Elements). The fair value for maintenance fees is based on
the price of the services sold separately, which is determined
by the annual renewal rate historically and consistently charged
to customers (the Maintenance Valuation).
Maintenance fees are generally priced as a percentage of the
related license fee. The fair value for training services is
based on standard pricing (i.e., rate per training day charged
to customers for class attendance), taking into consideration
stand-alone sales of training services through year-end seminars
and historically consistent pricing for such services (the
Training Valuation). The fair value for
implementation services is based on standard pricing (i.e., rate
per hour charged to customers for implementation services),
taking into consideration stand-alone sales of implementation
services through special projects and historically consistent
pricing for such services (the Implementation
Valuation). Under the residual method (the Residual
Method), the fair value of the undelivered elements is
deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee
attributable to the delivered element, the license fee, is
recognized as revenue. If VSOE for one or more undelivered
elements does not exist, the revenue is deferred on the entire
arrangement until the earlier of the point at which
(i) such VSOE does exist or (ii) all elements of the
arrangement have been delivered.
Perpetual licenses of UltiPro sold without Hosting Services
typically include a license fee and the Standard Undelivered
Elements. Fair value for the Standard Undelivered Elements is
based on the Maintenance Valuation, the Training Valuation and
the Implementation Valuation. The delivered element of the
arrangement, the license fee, is accounted for in accordance
with the Residual Method.
Perpetual licenses of UltiPro sold with Hosting Services
typically include a license fee, the Standard Undelivered
Elements and Hosting Services. Fair value for the Standard
Undelivered Elements is based on
41
the Maintenance Valuation, the Training Valuation and the
Implementation Valuation. Hosting Services are delivered to
customers on a PEPM basis over the term of the related customer
contract (Hosting PEPM Services). Upfront fees
charged to customers represent fees for the hosting
infrastructure, including hardware costs, third-party license
fees and other upfront costs incurred by the Company in relation
to providing such services (Hosting Upfront Fees).
Hosting PEPM Services and Hosting Upfront Fees (collectively,
Hosting Services) represent undelivered elements in
the arrangement since their delivery is over the course of the
related contract term. The fair value for Hosting Services is
based on standard pricing (i.e., rate charged
per-employee-per-month), taking into consideration stand-alone
sales of Hosting Services through the sale of such services to
existing customers (i.e., those who already own the UltiPro
perpetual license at the time Hosting Services are sold to them)
and historically consistent pricing for such services (the
Hosting Valuation). The delivered element of the
arrangement, the license fee, is accounted for in accordance
with the Residual Method.
The Companys customer contracts are non-cancelable
agreements. The Company does not provide for rights of return or
price protection on its software. The Company provides a limited
warranty that its software will perform in accordance with user
manuals for varying periods, which are generally less than one
year from the contract date. The Companys customer
contracts generally do not include conditions of acceptance.
However, if conditions of acceptance are included in a contract
or uncertainty exists about customer acceptance of the software,
license revenue is deferred until acceptance occurs.
Sales Generated from the Intersourcing Offering
Subscription revenues generated from the Intersourcing Offering,
are recognized in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements
with Multiple Deliverables as a services arrangement since
the customer is purchasing the right to use UltiPro rather than
licensing the software on a perpetual basis. Fair value of
multiple elements in Intersourcing arrangements is assigned to
each element based on the guidance provided by EITF 00-21.
The elements that typically exist in Intersourcing arrangements
include hosting services, the right to use UltiPro, maintenance
of UltiPro (i.e., product enhancements and customer support) and
professional services (i.e., implementation services and
training in the use of UltiPro). The pricing for hosting
services, the right to use UltiPro and maintenance of UltiPro is
bundled (the Bundled Elements). Since these three
Bundled Elements are components of recurring revenues in the
consolidated statements of operations, allocation of fair values
to each of the three elements is not necessary and they are not
reported separately. Fair value for the Bundled Elements, as a
whole, is based upon evidence provided by the Companys
pricing for Intersourcing arrangements sold separately. The
Bundled Elements are provided on an ongoing basis and represent
undelivered elements under EITF 00-21; they are recognized on a
monthly basis as the services are performed, once the customer
has begun to process payrolls used to pay its employees (i.e.,
goes Live).
Implementation and training services (the Professional
Services) provided for Intersourcing arrangements are
priced on a time and materials basis and are recognized as
services revenue in the consolidated statements of operations as
the services are performed. Fair value for Professional Services
is based on the respective Training Valuation and Implementation
Valuation. Under EITF 00-21, fair value is assigned to service
elements in the arrangement based on their relative fair values,
using the prices established when the services are sold on a
stand-alone basis. If evidence of the fair value of one or more
undelivered elements does not exist, the revenue is deferred and
recognized when delivery of those elements occurs or when fair
value can be established. The Company believes that applying
EITF 00-21 to Intersourcing arrangements as opposed to applying
SOP 97-2 is appropriate given the nature of the arrangements
whereby the customer has no right to the UltiPro license.
Sales of Base Hosting Services
Subscription revenues generated from Base Hosting are recognized
in accordance with EITF 00-3, Application of AICPA
Statement of Position 97-2 to Arrangements That Include the
Right to Use Software Stored on Another Entitys
Hardware, which provides guidance as to the application of
SOP 97-2 to hosting
42
arrangements that include a license right to the software. The
elements that typically exist for Base Hosting arrangements
include hosting services and implementation services. Base
Hosting is different than Intersourcing arrangements (described
above) in that the customer already owns a perpetual license or
is purchasing a perpetual license for UltiPro and is purchasing
hosting services subsequently in a separate transaction whereas,
with Intersourcing, the customer is purchasing the right to use
(not license) UltiPro. Implementation services provided for Base
Hosting arrangements are substantially less than those provided
for Intersourcing arrangements since UltiPro is already
implemented in Base Hosting arrangements and only needs to be
transitioned to a hosted environment. Fair value for hosting
services is based on the Hosting Valuation. Fair value for
implementation services is assigned in accordance with
guidelines provided by SOP 97-2 based on the Implementation
Valuation.
Services, including Implementation and Training Services
Services revenues include revenues from fees charged for the
implementation of the Companys software products and
training of customers in the use of such products, fees for
services provided to BSPs, including those related to the
Ceridian Services Agreements through December 31, 2004, the
provision of payroll-related forms and the printing of
Form W-2s for certain customers, as well as certain
reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses. Revenues for training and
implementation consulting services are recognized as services
are performed. Other services are recognized as the product is
shipped or as the services are rendered depending on the
specific terms of the arrangement.
Arrangement fees related to fixed-fee implementation services
contracts are recognized using the percentage of completion
accounting method, which involves the use of estimates.
Percentage of completion is measured at each reporting date
based on hours incurred to date compared to total estimated
hours to complete. If a sufficient basis to measure the progress
towards completion does not exist, revenue is recognized when
the project is completed or when the Company receives final
acceptance from the customer.
Recurring Revenues
Recurring revenues include maintenance revenues and subscription
revenues. Maintenance revenues are derived from maintaining,
supporting and providing periodic updates for the Companys
software. Subscription revenues are principally derived from
PEPM fees earned through the Intersourcing Offering, Base
Hosting and the business service provider (BSP) sales
channel (defined below), as well as revenues generated from the
Original Ceridian Agreement (defined below). Maintenance
revenues are recognized ratably over the service period,
generally one year. Maintenance and support fees are generally
priced as a percentage of the initial license fee for the
underlying products. To the extent there are upfront fees
associated with the Intersourcing Offering, Base Hosting or the
BSP sales channel, subscription revenues are recognized ratably
over the term of the related contract upon the delivery of the
product and services. PEPM fees from the Intersourcing Offering,
Base Hosting and the BSP sales channel are recognized as
subscription revenue as the services are delivered. Commencing
on August 28, 2002, subscription revenues generated from
the Original Ceridian Agreement are recognized ratably over the
minimum term of the contract, which is expected to extend until
March 9, 2008 (7 years after the effective date of the
Original Ceridian Agreement). Subscription revenues of
approximately $642,000 per month are based on guaranteed minimum
payments from Ceridian Corporation of approximately
$42.7 million over the contract term, including
$23.0 million received to date.
Maintenance services provided to customers include product
updates and technical support services. Product updates are
included in general releases to the Companys customers and
are distributed on a periodic basis. Such updates may include,
but are not limited to, product enhancements, payroll tax
updates, additional security features or bug fixes. All features
provided in general releases are unspecified upgrade rights. To
the extent specified upgrade rights or entitlements to future
products are included in a multi-element arrangement; revenue is
recognized upon delivery provided fair value for the elements
exists. In multi-element arrangements that include a specified
upgrade right or entitlement to a future product, if fair value
does not exist for all undelivered elements, revenue for the
entire arrangement is deferred until all elements are delivered
or when fair value can be established.
43
Subscription revenues generated from the BSP sales channel
include both the right to use UltiPro and maintenance. The BSP
is charged a fee on a PEPM basis and, in several cases, is
subject to a guaranteed monthly minimum amount for the term of
the related agreement. Revenue is recognized on a PEPM basis. To
the extent the BSP pays the Company a one-time upfront fee, the
Company accounts for such fee by recognizing it as subscription
revenue over the minimum term of the related agreement.
The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the Securities
Exchange Commission (SEC) Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements (SAB No. 101)
and the SEC Staff Accounting Bulleting No. 104,
Revenue Recognition
(SAB No. 104). Management believes the
Company is currently in compliance with the current provisions
set forth in SOP 97-2, SOP 98-9, EITF 00-21, EITF 00-3,
SAB No. 101 and SAB No. 104.
Concentration of Revenues
During the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, Ceridian
accounted for 15.5% and 16.6%, respectively, of total revenues.
Ceridian did not account for more than 10% of total revenues in
2002. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of total
revenues in the periods presented. Due to the significant
concentration of total revenues with this single customer, the
Company has exposure if this customer loses its credit
worthiness. See Note 3.
The composition of the revenues recognized from Ceridian, as a
percentage of total revenues, for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring revenues
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Services revenues
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
15.5 |
% |
|
|
16.6 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Revenue
Deferred revenue is primarily comprised of deferrals for
recurring revenues for which maintenance services have not yet
been rendered, implementation consulting services for which the
services have not yet been rendered, Intersourcing services
which are recognized over the term of the related contract as
the services are performed, typically two years, and
subscription revenues which are recognized ratably over the term
of the related contract upon the delivery of the product and
services.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues consists of cost of license, recurring and
services revenues. Cost of license revenues primarily consists
of fees payable to a third-party for software products
distributed by the Company and, to a lesser degree, amortization
of capitalized software. Cost of recurring revenues consists of
costs to provide maintenance and technical support to the
Companys customers, the cost of providing periodic updates
and the costs of subscription revenues, including amortization
of capitalized software. Cost of service revenues primarily
consists of costs to provide implementation services and
training to the Companys customers, and, to a lesser
degree, costs related to sales of payroll-related forms and
costs associated with reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses.
Income Taxes
The Company is subject to corporate Federal and state income
taxes and accounts for income taxes under the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.
SFAS No. 109 provides for a liability approach under
which deferred income taxes are provided based upon enacted tax
laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the taxes
become payable.
44
Software Development Costs
SFAS No. 86, Accounting for the Costs of
Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise
Marketed, requires capitalization of certain software
development costs subsequent to the establishment of
technological feasibility. Based on the Companys product
development process, technological feasibility is established
upon completion of a working model. There were no software costs
capitalized during 2004, 2003 or 2002. Annual amortization is
based on the greater of the amount computed using (a) the
ratio that current gross revenues for the related product bears
to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues
for that product or (b) the straight-line method over the
remaining estimated economic life of the product including the
period being reported on. Capitalized software is amortized
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives
of the assets, which are typically three years. Amortization of
capitalized software was $1,151,000, $1,519,000 and $1,792,000
in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Accumulated amortization
of capitalized software was $5.5 million and
$4.4 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Capitalized software, net of amortization, was
$0.1 million and $1.2 million as of December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company evaluates the
recoverability of capitalized software based on estimated future
gross revenues reduced by the estimated costs of completing the
products and of performing maintenance and customer support. If
the Companys gross revenues were to be significantly less
than its estimates, the net realizable value of the
Companys capitalized software intended for sale would be
impaired, which could result in the write-off of all or a
portion of the unamortized balance of such capitalized software.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments, consisting of cash and
cash equivalents, investments in marketable securities, accounts
receivable, accounts payable, long-term debt and capital lease
obligations approximated fair value as of December 31, 2004
and 2003.
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, the Company continues to account
for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method
prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and has
made the pro forma disclosures required by
SFAS No. 123 for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2004. See Note 12.
SFAS No. 123 requires pro forma information for
options issued to employees and has been determined as if the
Company had accounted for its stock-based compensation plan
under the fair value method. The fair value of each option
granted was estimated at the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions used for grants: risk-free interest rates of
3.5% for 2004, 3.1% for 2003 and 2.7% for 2002, a dividend yield
of 0% for all three years presented, expected volatility of 46%
for
45
2004, 48% for 2003 and 68% for 2002 and an expected life of four
years for 2004 and 2003 and three years for 2002. The
Companys pro forma information is as follows (in
thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
(5,024 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,169 |
) |
|
$ |
(14,568 |
) |
|
|
|
Compensation expense, pro forma
|
|
|
(1,997 |
) |
|
|
(1,424 |
) |
|
|
(2,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
(7,021 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,593 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,961 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.49 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.90 |
) |
|
|
|
Compensation expense, pro forma
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant date fair value per share of options
granted during 2004, 2003 and 2002 were $5.02, $2.22 and $2.16,
respectively.
Earnings Per Share
SFAS No. 128, Earnings Per Share, requires
dual presentation of earnings per share basic
and diluted. Basic earnings per share is computed by
dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator)
by the weighted average number of common shares (the
denominator) for the period. The computation of diluted earnings
per share is similar to basic earnings per share, except that
the denominator is increased to include the number of additional
common shares that would have been outstanding if the
potentially dilutive common shares had been issued.
The following is a reconciliation of the shares used in the
computation of basic and diluted net loss per share (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
21,743 |
|
|
|
18,738 |
|
|
|
16,189 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive shares outstanding
|
|
|
21,743 |
|
|
|
18,738 |
|
|
|
16,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other common stock equivalents (i.e., stock options and
warrants) not included in the computation of diluted net loss
per share, as their impact is antidilutive, totaled 5,935,000,
5,797,000 and 4,821,000 for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
In 1998, the Company adopted SFAS No. 130,
Reporting Comprehensive Income, which establishes
standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income
and its components in a full set of financial statements. The
objective of SFAS No. 130 is to report a measure
(comprehensive income (loss)) of all changes in equity of an
enterprise that result from transactions and other economic
events in a period other than transactions with owners.
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, as presented on the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets and statements of
stockholders equity, consists entirely of unrealized gains
on available-for-sale securities.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company adopted SFAS No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based CompensationTransition and DisclosureAn
Amendment of SFAS No. 123
(SFAS No. 148) in December 2002.
SFAS No. 148
46
amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS No. 123), to
provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change
to the fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based
employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require
prominent disclosures in not only annual, but also interim
financial statements about the effect the fair value method
would have had on reported results. The Company accounted for
stock-based compensation in accordance with
SFAS No. 148.
Guarantees
The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements
for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others, (FIN 45) on January 1, 2003.
The provision for initial recognition and measurement of
liability is applied on a prospective basis to guarantees issued
or modified after December 31, 2002. FIN 45 expands
previously issued accounting guidance and disclosure
requirements for certain guarantees and requires recognition of
an initial liability for the fair value of an obligation assumed
by issuing a guarantee. As an element of standard commercial
terms in its standard sales contracts for UltiPro, the Company
includes an indemnification clause that indemnifies the customer
against certain liabilities and damages arising from any claims
of patent, copyright, or other proprietary rights of any third
party. Due to the nature of the intellectual property
indemnification provided to its customers, the Company can not
estimate the fair value, nor determine the total nominal amount,
of the indemnification until such time as a claim for such
indemnification is made. In the event of a claim made against
the Company under such provision, the Company evaluates
estimated losses for such indemnification under SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for Contingencies, as interpreted by
FIN 45, considering such factors as the degree of
probability of an unfavorable outcome and the ability to make a
reasonable estimate of the amount of loss. To date, the Company
has not had any claims made against it under such provision and,
accordingly, has not accrued any liabilities related to such
indemnifications in its unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements.
Segment Information
The Company adopted SFAS No. 131, Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information,
effective December 31, 1998
(SFAS No. 131). SFAS No. 131
establishes standards for the way that public companies report
selected information about operating segments in annual and
interim financial reports to shareholders. It also establishes
standards for related disclosures about an enterprises
business segments, products, services, geographic areas and
major customers. The Company operates its business as a single
segment.
Reimbursable Out-Of-Pocket Expenses
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board Emerging Issues Task Force
No. 01-14, Income Statement Characterization of
Reimbursements Received for Out-of-Pocket Expenses
Incurred (EITF 01-14). EITF 01-14 requires
companies to characterize reimbursements received for
out-of-pocket expenses incurred as revenue and to reclassify
prior period financial statements to conform to current year
presentation for comparative purposes. Reimbursable
out-of-pocket expenses, which are included in services revenues
and cost of services revenues in the Companys accompanying
consolidated statements of operations, were $1.0 million,
$1.3 million and $1.2 million for 2004, 2003 and 2002
respectively. Prior to the adoption of EITF 01-14, the
Companys historical consolidated financial statements
offset these amounts within cost of services revenues.
Recent Accounting Literature
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123
(revised 2004), Share-Based Payment
(SFAS 123R), which replaces
SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (SFAS 123) and supercedes
APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. SFAS 123R requires all share-based
payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on
their fair values and the recording of such expense in the
47
consolidated statements of operations. The accounting provisions
of SFAS 123R are effective for reporting periods beginning
after June 15, 2005. The Company is required to adopt the
provisions of SFAS 123R effective July 1, 2005. The
pro forma disclosures previously permitted under SFAS 123
no longer will be an alternative to financial statement
recognition. Under SFAS 123R, the Company must determine
the appropriate fair value model to be used for valuing
share-based payments, the amortization method for compensation
cost and the transition method to be used at date of adoption.
The Company has not yet determined the method of adoption or the
effect of adopting SFAS 123R, and has not determined
whether the adoption will result in amounts that are similar to
the current pro forma disclosures under SFAS 123.
In December 2003, the FASB issued a revised Interpretation
No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,
an interpretation of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51, (FIN 46R).
FIN 46R requires the consolidation of entities in which an
enterprise absorbs a majority of the entitys expected
losses, receives a majority of the entitys expected
residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual
or other financial interests in the entity. Currently entities
are generally consolidated by an enterprise when it has a
controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority
voting interest in the entity. The provisions of FIN 46R
are generally effective for existing (prior to February 1,
2003) variable interest relationships of a public entity no
later than the end of the first reporting period that ends after
March 15, 2004. However, prior to the required application
of this interpretation a public entity that is not a small
business issuer shall apply FIN 46R to those entities that
are considered to be special-purpose entities no later than the
end of the first reporting period that ends after
December 15, 2003. The adoption of FIN 46R did not
have an impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements.
3. SIGNIFICANT TRANSACTIONS
Original Ceridian Agreement
During 2001, Ultimate Software and Ceridian Corporation
(Ceridian) reached an agreement, as amended in 2002,
which granted Ceridian a non-exclusive license to use UltiPro
software as part of an on-line offering that Ceridian can market
primarily to businesses with under 500 employees (the
Original Ceridian Agreement). Ceridian marketed that
solution under the name SourceWeb.
Under the agreement, Ceridian is responsible for all marketing
costs and expenses, and must sell the licensed software on a per
period, per employee, per paycheck basis or other repetitive
payment model. Ceridian is required to pay the Company a monthly
license fee based on the number of employees paid using the
licensed software. These payments are subject to a minimum
monthly payment of $500,000 per month with increases of 5% per
annum, compounded beginning in January 2006. The maximum monthly
payment is $1.0 million, subject to increases of 5% per
annum, compounded. The aggregate minimum payments that Ceridian
is obligated to pay Ultimate Software under the Original
Ceridian Agreement over the minimum term of the agreement is
$42.7 million. To date, Ceridian has paid to Ultimate
Software a total of $23.0 million under the Original
Ceridian Agreement. The earliest date upon which the Ceridian
Agreement can be terminated by either party (except for an
uncured material breach) is March 9, 2008, resulting in an
expected minimum term of 7 years. Ceridian retains certain
rights to use the software upon termination.
During December 2004, RSM McGladrey Employer Services, an
existing business service provider of Ultimate Softwares,
acquired Ceridians SourceWeb HR/payroll and self-service
product and existing SourceWeb base of small and midsize
business customers throughout the United States (the RSM
Acquisition). The financial terms of the Original Ceridian
Agreement have not changed as a result of the RSM Acquisition.
Ceridian will continue to be financially obligated to pay
Ultimate Software a minimum fee of $500,000 per month with
increases of 5% per annum, compounded beginning in January 2006.
Ultimate Software expects to continue to recognize a minimum of
$642,000 per month in recurring subscription revenues from the
Original Ceridian Agreement until its termination.
Ceridian Services Agreements
On April 7, 2004, the Company and Ceridian extended their
services agreement which expired on December 31, 2003 (the
Extended Ceridian Services Agreement). Under the
Extended Ceridian Services
48
Agreement, which was effective January 1, 2004 through
September 30, 2004, Ceridian was obligated to pay Ultimate
Software a total of $2.5 million in three equal
installments in exchange for services provided by Ultimate
Software during the term of that agreement. All three
installment payments due under the Extended Services Agreement
were received by the Company through July 2004. During October
2004, the Extended Ceridian Services Agreement was further
extended until December 31, 2004 for a fee of
$0.8 million, received in a single installment in November
2004. Services revenue from the Extended Ceridian Services
Agreement was recognized on a straight-line basis from
January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004. The
Extended Ceridian Services Agreement expired on
December 31, 2004 and was not renewed.
4. INVESTMENTS IN MARKETABLE SECURITIES
Investments in marketable securities consist entirely of equity
securities available-for-sale. Included in accumulated other
comprehensive loss for 2004 is $15,558 of unrealized loss on
trading securities held at year end. There was no unrealized
gain or loss in 2003 and 2002 as no such securities were held
during those periods.
5. ACQUISITION
On June 9, 2003, the Company purchased substantially all of
the assets of HireWorks, Inc., a software company that
developed, marketed and supported an Internet recruitment
solution. The assets acquired included customer contracts, the
source code for its software and computer equipment. The Company
has accounted for this transaction as a purchase. The resulting
intangible asset related to the customer contracts acquired is
being amortized over 26 months. The Company had no
acquisitions in 2004.
6. STOCK REPURCHASE PLAN
On October 30, 2000, the Company announced that its board
of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares
of the Companys outstanding Common Stock (the Stock
Repurchase Plan). Stock repurchases may be made
periodically in the open market, in privately negotiated
transactions or a combination of both. The extent and timing of
these transactions will depend on market conditions and other
business considerations. There were no repurchases of the
Companys Common Stock during 2004 and 2003. During 2002,
the Company purchased 46,150 shares of the Companys Common
Stock under the Stock Repurchase Plan at an average cost of
$4.14 per share. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the
Company had purchased 257,647 shares of the Companys
Common Stock under the Stock Repurchase Plan.
7. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales commissions
|
|
$ |
1,258 |
|
|
$ |
1,246 |
|
Other items individually less than 5% of total current
liabilities
|
|
|
4,757 |
|
|
|
4,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,015 |
|
|
$ |
5,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
8. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$ |
21,073 |
|
|
$ |
16,473 |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
4,038 |
|
|
|
3,952 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
1,306 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
Building
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
|
655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,742 |
|
|
|
21,706 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(18,230 |
) |
|
|
(14,518 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,512 |
|
|
$ |
7,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in property and equipment is equipment acquired under
capital leases as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
$ |
7,543 |
|
|
$ |
6,161 |
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(6,057 |
) |
|
|
(4,941 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment
totaled $3,754,000, $3,424,000 and $3,823,000, for the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
9. CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
The Company leases certain equipment under noncancellable
agreements, which are accounted for as capital leases and expire
at various dates through 2007. Interest rates on these leases
range from 1.0% to 10.0%. The annual maturities of the capital
lease obligations are as follows as of December 31, 2004
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
990 |
|
2006
|
|
|
824 |
|
2007
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,967 |
|
Less amount representing interest
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligations reflected as current ($928) and non-current
($952)
|
|
$ |
1,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY AND LONG-TERM DEBT
In November 2001, the Company entered into a $5.0 million
revolving line of credit (the Credit Facility) with
Silicon Valley Bank. The Credit Facility, as amended, expires on
May 27, 2005 and bears interest at a rate equal to Prime
Rate plus 1.0% per annum (reduced to Prime Rate plus 0.5% per
annum upon two consecutive quarters of net profitability, as
defined). The Credit Facility provides working capital financing
for up to 75% of the Companys eligible accounts receivable
not to exceed $3.0 million (the Revolving
Note), as defined, stand-by letters of credit for up to
$0.5 million as a component of the Revolving Note and
financing for eligible equipment purchases for up to
$2.0 million with additional limits for software purchases
(the Equipment Term Note). The Equipment Term Note
is payable in 36 equal
50
monthly installments, plus interest at Prime Rate plus 1%. The
maximum amount available under the Credit Facility is
$5.0 million. At December 31, 2004, $4.5 million
was available for borrowing under the Credit Facility with
$0.4 million outstanding under the Equipment Term Note.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by all of the
Companys corporate assets, including a negative pledge on
intellectual property, and the Company is required to comply
with certain financial and other covenants. Under the terms of
the Credit Facility, the Company may not pay dividends without
the prior written consent of Silicon Valley Bank. The material
covenants require that the Company maintain, on a monthly basis,
a minimum quick ratio (representing the ratio of current assets
to current liabilities, excluding deferred revenue) of 1.75 to
1.0 and certain quarterly revenue levels as of the end of each
quarter, as provided in the Credit Facility, as amended. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with all
covenants included in the terms of the Credit Facility.
11. INCOME TAXES
No provision or benefit for Federal or state income taxes was
made for 2004, 2003 and 2002 due to the operating losses
incurred in the respective periods.
The provision for income taxes is different from that which
would be obtained by applying the statutory Federal income tax
rate of 35% to loss before income taxes as a result of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit at statutory Federal tax rate
|
|
$ |
(1,758 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,210 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,099 |
) |
State and local income taxes
|
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
(527 |
) |
|
|
(838 |
) |
Non deductible expenses
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
3,514 |
|
|
|
5,768 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the net deferred tax assets included in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating losses
|
|
$ |
25,640 |
|
|
$ |
23,092 |
|
|
$ |
17,851 |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
4,467 |
|
|
|
4,160 |
|
|
|
6,264 |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
Accruals not currently deductible
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax assets
|
|
|
31,501 |
|
|
|
28,600 |
|
|
|
25,538 |
|
Less valuation allowance
|
|
|
(31,177 |
) |
|
|
(27,959 |
) |
|
|
(24,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
1,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software development costs
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
Prepaid commissions
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
(641 |
) |
|
|
(1,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred taxes
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the
deferred tax assets as realization of such amounts is not
considered more likely than not. The Company reviews the
valuation allowance requirement periodically and makes
adjustments as warranted. Of the total valuation allowance at
December 31, 2004, approximately $2,180,000 is attributed
to net operating losses generated from the exercise of
non-statutory employee stock options, the benefit of which will
be credited to additional paid-in capital when realized. Of the
change in the valuation allowance for 2004, 2003 and 2002,
approximately $1,466,000, $212,000 and $4,000, respectively, is
attributable to exercise of non-statutory employee stock options.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately
$62,900,000 of net operating loss carryforwards for Federal
income tax reporting purposes available to offset future taxable
income. Of the total net operating loss carryforwards,
approximately $5,350,000 is attributable to deductions from the
exercise of non-statutory employee stock options. The
carryforwards expire through 2024. Utilization of such net
operating losses may be limited as a result of cumulative
ownership changes in the Companys equity instruments.
12. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Private Sales of Common Stock
On May 12, 2004, the Company entered into a definitive
agreement to sell 1,398,182 newly issued shares of the
Companys common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the
Common Stock) to three institutional investors in a
private placement for gross proceeds of approximately
$15.4 million (the Recent Capital Raised).
These shares of Common Stock were sold at $11.00 per share.
After deducting commissions and other stock issuance costs, the
Company received approximately $14.4 million. The Company
is using the net proceeds from the Recent Capital Raised for
general corporate purposes, including working capital and
funding the Companys transition from a license model to a
business model with a higher percentage of recurring revenues.
The Company filed a registration statement with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on Form S-3 (Registration
No. 333-115894) covering resales of the Common Stock by
investors, which registration statement was declared effective
on June 25, 2004.
From January 1, 2003 through July 16, 2003, the
Company raised an aggregate of approximately $17.5 million
of capital, net of estimated stock issuance costs, through the
private sales of (i) a total of 1,708,000 shares of the
Common Stock, and warrants to purchase an aggregate 170,800
shares of Common Stock at $4.00 per share to investors,
including Ceridian Corporation and some existing shareholders;
and (ii) a total of 2,200,000 shares of Common Stock at
$5.30 per share, before stock issuance costs, to two
institutional investors.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has adopted The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (the Plan) under
which the Company is authorized to issue options to purchase a
total of 9,000,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock to
directors, officers and employees of the Company. Under the
Plan, options to purchase shares of Common Stock may be granted
at prices equal to the fair market value of shares of the
Companys Common Stock as of the date of grant, or at such
other amount as may be determined by the Compensation Committee
of the Board of Directors appointed to administer the Plan (the
Committee). The Committee has discretion under the
Plan to prescribe vesting periods for options which are granted
under the Plan. In addition, options granted under the Plan
become immediately exercisable in the event of a change in
control of the Company and in certain other circumstances. The
maximum term of the options granted under the Plan is
10 years. As of December 31, 2004, options to purchase
2,405,525 shares of the Companys Common Stock were
available for grant under the Plan.
The Plan provides that non-employee members of the
Companys Board of Directors shall receive options in lieu
of any retainer or meeting fees for serving on the Board or
committees thereof. Such options vest upon the date of grant and
have an exercise price equal to 30% of fair market value of the
Companys Common Stock on the date of the grant. Options
granted to non-employee Board members prior to December 31,
2004 are fully exercisable upon grant date.
52
A summary of stock options under the Companys Plan as of
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and changes during the
years then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2001
|
|
|
4,596,241 |
|
|
$ |
6.06 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
345,769 |
|
|
|
3.54 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(7,275 |
) |
|
|
3.92 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(205,461 |
) |
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
4,729,274 |
|
|
$ |
5.84 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,018,814 |
|
|
|
5.93 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(135,495 |
) |
|
|
3.86 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(56,445 |
) |
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
5,556,148 |
|
|
$ |
5.89 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
674,756 |
|
|
|
12.04 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(478,446 |
) |
|
|
4.55 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
(14,153 |
) |
|
|
8.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
5,738,305 |
|
|
$ |
6.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding under the Plan at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise |
|
|
|
Contractual Life |
|
Weighted-Average |
|
|
|
Weighted-Average |
Prices |
|
Number |
|
(Years) |
|
Exercise Price |
|
Number |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.89$3.38
|
|
|
961,575 |
|
|
|
6.39 |
|
|
$ |
2.81 |
|
|
|
954,325 |
|
|
$ |
2.80 |
|
$3.38$4.23
|
|
|
724,398 |
|
|
|
7.78 |
|
|
|
3.88 |
|
|
|
391,384 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
$4.25$5.16
|
|
|
787,261 |
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
|
|
787,261 |
|
|
|
4.97 |
|
$6.24$7.00
|
|
|
98,387 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
6.57 |
|
|
|
85,387 |
|
|
|
6.62 |
|
$7.21$7.21
|
|
|
826,842 |
|
|
|
2.82 |
|
|
|
7.21 |
|
|
|
826,842 |
|
|
|
7.21 |
|
$7.63$7.63
|
|
|
573,844 |
|
|
|
4.80 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
|
|
573,844 |
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
$7.75$9.40
|
|
|
803,654 |
|
|
|
6.49 |
|
|
|
8.60 |
|
|
|
633,776 |
|
|
|
8.41 |
|
$10.00$11.53
|
|
|
585,894 |
|
|
|
6.43 |
|
|
|
10.61 |
|
|
|
383,512 |
|
|
|
10.24 |
|
$11.76$11.76
|
|
|
13,450 |
|
|
|
9.30 |
|
|
|
11.76 |
|
|
|
3,366 |
|
|
|
11.76 |
|
$13.05$13.05
|
|
|
363,000 |
|
|
|
9.80 |
|
|
|
13.05 |
|
|
|
90,938 |
|
|
|
13.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.89$13.05
|
|
|
5,738,305 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
$ |
6.70 |
|
|
|
4,730,635 |
|
|
$ |
6.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
A summary of warrants to purchase shares of the Companys
Common Stock as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, and
changes during the years then ended, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Shares |
|
Exercise Price |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
67,500 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
67,500 |
|
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
170,800 |
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(12,500 |
) |
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
225,800 |
|
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(28,750 |
) |
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
Canceled
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
197,050 |
|
|
$ |
4.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
The holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share
for each share held of record on all matters submitted to a vote
of the stockholders.
Other Equity Transactions
The following table summarizes information about stock options
granted by the Company to non-employee directors to purchase the
Companys Common Stock in exchange for services rendered
for 2004, 2003 and 2002 (Board Options):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise Price of Stock |
|
|
Options Granted(1)(2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Granted |
|
|
|
2002:
|
|
$ |
1.23 |
|
|
|
7,315 |
|
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
8,766 |
|
|
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
7,614 |
|
|
|
|
0.89 |
|
|
|
12,528 |
|
|
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
2003:
|
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
10,850 |
|
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
7,892 |
|
|
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
|
4,818 |
|
|
|
|
2.67 |
|
|
|
7,067 |
|
|
2004:
|
|
|
4.05 |
|
|
|
3,074 |
|
|
|
|
3.17 |
|
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
|
4,146 |
|
|
|
|
3.65 |
|
|
|
4,806 |
|
(1) In 2002, options to purchase 100,000 shares of the
Companys Common Stock for $3.10 per share were granted at
fair market value to non-employee directors. All other stock
option grants to non-employee
54
directors during 2004, 2003 and 2002 were granted at an exercise
price equal to 30% of the fair market value of the
Companys Common Stock on the date of grant.
(2) Such options are currently exercisable and were valued on
the date of grant in accordance with the requirements prescribed
in APB 25. See Note 2. These options were granted in lieu
of cash retainers and meeting fees.
(3) The compensation expense related to the Board Options
granted in 2004, 2003 and 2002, determined pursuant to the
application of APB 25, was $136,000, $132,000 and $86,000,
respectively, and is included in general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of
operations.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases
The Company leases corporate office space and certain equipment
under noncancellable operating lease agreements expiring at
various dates. Total rent expense under these agreements was
$2,659,000, $2,408,000 and $2,024,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Future
minimum annual rental commitments related to these leases are as
follows at December 31, 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
1,775 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,653 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,555 |
|
2008
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
9,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
17,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Liability
Software products such as those offered by the Company
frequently contain undetected errors or failures when first
introduced or as new versions are released. Testing of the
Companys products is particularly challenging because it
is difficult to simulate the wide variety of computing
environments in which the Companys customers may deploy
these products. Despite extensive testing, the Company from time
to time has discovered defects or errors in products. There can
be no assurance that such defects, errors or difficulties will
not cause delays in product introductions and shipments, result
in increased costs and diversion of development resources,
require design modifications or decrease market acceptance or
customer satisfaction with the Companys products. In
addition, there can be no assurance that, despite testing by the
Company and by current and potential customers, errors will not
be found after commencement of commercial shipments, resulting
in loss of or delay in market acceptance, which could have a
material adverse effect upon the Companys business,
operating results and financial condition.
Litigation
From time-to-time, the Company is involved in litigation
relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal
course of business. The Company is not currently a party to any
legal proceeding the adverse outcome of which, individually or
in the aggregate, could reasonably be expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Companys operating results
or financial condition.
14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the fourth quarter of 2001, The Company began leasing
equipment with a computer leasing company (the Leasing
Company) that is owned by an irrevocable trust (the
Trust) for the benefit of the children of Robert A.
Yanover, a member of the Companys Board of Directors.
Additionally, the Leasing Companys business is managed and
operated by a management company (the Management
Company)
55
pursuant to a management agreement. Mr. Yanover has a 50%
ownership interest in the general partner of the Management
Company. The Company did not finance equipment with the Leasing
Company in 2004 or 2003. The Company financed equipment with the
Leasing Company totaling $1,007,000 and $258,000 during 2002 and
2001, respectively. Related amortization was $331,000, $506,000
and $415,000 and total cash paid was $499,000, $569,000 and
$467,000 during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The
unamortized capital lease obligation with the Leasing Company
and related accumulated amortization were $0 and $1,265,000,
respectively, at December 31, 2004, $360,000 and $933,000,
respectively, at December 31, 2003 and $869,000 and
$427,000, respectively, at December 31, 2002. The Company
believes that the terms of the leases were no less favorable to
the Company than could have been obtained from an unaffiliated
party.
15. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
The Company provides retirement benefits for eligible employees,
as defined, through a defined contribution benefit plan that is
qualified under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code
(the Plan). Contributions to the Plan, which are
made at the sole discretion of the Company, were $718,000,
$587,000 and $602,000 for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and
with the participation of the Companys management,
including the Chief Executive Officer (the CEO) and
the Chief Financial Officer (the CFO), of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of
1934 Rule 13a-15. Based on that evaluation, the
Companys management, including the CEO and CFO, concluded
that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting them to material information
required to be included in the Companys periodic SEC
reports. It should be noted that the design of any system of
controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that
any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all
potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term
is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
based on the framework in Internal Control -Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our
evaluation under the framework in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework, our management concluded that our internal
control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2004. Our managements assessment of the
effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2004 has been audited by KPMG LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report, which is included below.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.:
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Annual Report on Internal Control
Over Financial Reporting that The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.
and subsidiary
56
(the Company) maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The
Companys management is responsible for maintaining
effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the COSO. Also, in our
opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by
the COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity (deficit),
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2004, and our report dated
March 10, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements.
Miami, Florida
March 10, 2005
57
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no significant changes in internal control over
financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2004 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
On October 20, 2004, the Compensation Committee of the
Board of Directors approved awards under the Companys
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan to employees of the Company,
including executive officers. The options granted have an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Common
Stock as of the close of business on the date of grant ($13.05)
and vest as follows: 25% of the options were immediately vested,
an additional 25% shall become vested at each of the first,
second and third anniversaries of the grant, provided in each
case that the individual is employed by the Company on such
date. The number of shares subject to the options granted to the
executive officers were as follows: Scott Scherr, 100,000; Marc
D. Scherr, 75,000; and Mitchell K. Dauerman, 25,000.
58
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the
Registrant
The directors, executive officers (Messrs. Scott Scherr,
Marc D. Scherr and Mitchell K. Dauerman) and other key employees
of the Company, and their ages as of February 18, 2005, are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age |
|
Position(s) |
|
|
|
|
|
Scott Scherr
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |
Marc D. Scherr
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Operating Officer |
Mitchell K. Dauerman
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Jon Harris
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Services |
Robert Manne
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel |
Vivian Maza
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, People and Secretary |
Linda Miller
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Marketing |
Laura Johnson
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Product Strategy |
Adam Rogers
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Development |
Greg Swick
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Sales |
Bill Hicks
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Vice President, Chief Information Officer |
Roy L. Gerber, Ph.D.
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Vice President, Chief Technology Officer |
James A. FitzPatrick, Jr.
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Director |
LeRoy A. Vander Putten
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
Director |
Rick A. Wilber
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Director |
Robert A. Yanover
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
Director |
Scott Scherr has served as President and a director of the
Company since its inception in April 1996 and has been Chairman
of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since
September 1996. Mr. Scherr is also a member of the
Executive Committee of the Board of Directors (the
Board). In 1990, Mr. Scherr founded The
Ultimate Software Group, Ltd. (the Partnership), the
business and operations of which were assumed by the Company in
1998. Mr. Scherr served as President of the
Partnerships general partner from the inception of the
Partnership until its dissolution in March 1998. From 1979 until
1990, he held various positions at Automatic Data Processing,
Inc. (ADP), a payroll services company, where his
titles included Vice President of Operations and Sales
Executive. Prior to joining ADP, Mr. Scherr operated
Management Statistics, Inc., a data processing service bureau
founded by his father, Reuben Scherr, in 1959. He is the brother
of Marc Scherr, the Vice Chairman of the Board of the Company
and the father-in-law of Adam Rogers, Senior Vice President,
Development.
Marc D. Scherr has been a director of the Company since its
inception in April 1996 and has served as Vice Chairman since
July 1998 and as Chief Operating Officer since October 2003.
Mr. Scherr is also a member of the Executive Committee of
the Board. Mr. Scherr became an executive officer of the
Company effective March 1, 2000. Mr. Scherr served as
a director of Gerschel & Co., Inc., a private investment
firm from January 1992 until March 2000. In December 1995,
Mr. Scherr co-founded Residential Company of America, Ltd.
(RCA), a real estate firm, and served as President
of its general partnership until March 2000. Mr. Scherr
also served as Vice President of RCAs general partnership
from its inception in August 1993 until December 1995. From 1990
to 1992, Mr. Scherr was a real estate pension fund advisor
at Aldrich, Eastman & Waltch. Previously, he was a partner
in the Boston law firm of Fine & Ambrogne. Mr. Scherr
is the brother of Scott Scherr, Chairman of the Board, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.
Mitchell K. Dauerman has served as Executive Vice President of
the Company since April 1998 and as Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer of the Company since September 1996. From 1979 to 1996,
59
Mr. Dauerman held various positions with KPMG LLP, serving
as a Partner in the firm from 1988 to 1996. Mr. Dauerman is
a Certified Public Accountant.
Jon Harris has served as Senior Vice President, Services since
January 1, 2002. Mr. Harris served as Vice President,
Professional Services from July 1998 through December 31,
2001. From 1992 to 1997, Mr. Harris held various management
positions within ADPs National Accounts Division. From
1989 to 1992, Mr. Harris held the position of Consulting
Services Director for Sykes Enterprises, Inc., a diverse
information technology company.
Robert Manne has served as Senior Vice President, General
Counsel since February 2004 and as Vice President, General
Counsel from May 1999 through January 2004. Prior to joining the
Company, Mr. Manne was an attorney and partner of Becker
& Poliakoff, P.A., an international law firm, since 1978. In
addition to administering the Litigation Department of the law
firm, Mr. Manne was a permanent member of the firms
executive committee which was responsible for law firm
operations. Mr. Manne has performed legal services for the
Company since its inception.
Vivian Maza has served as Senior Vice President, People for the
Company since February 2004 and as Vice President, People from
January 1998 through January 2004. Ms. Maza has served as
Secretary of the Company since September 1996. Prior to that,
Ms. Maza served as the Office Manager of the Company from
its organization in April 1996 and of the Partnership from its
inception in 1990 until April 1996. Ms. Maza is a HR
Generalist and holds a Professional in Human Resources
(PHR) certification from the Society for Human Resource
Management (SHRM) association. From 1985 to 1990,
Ms. Maza was a systems analyst for the Wholesale Division
of ADP.
Linda Miller has served as Senior Vice President, Marketing
since February 2004 and as Vice President, Communications and
Public Relations from January 1999 through January 2004.
Ms. Miller served as Vice President, Marketing, for the
Company from July 1998 to January 1999. Prior to that,
Ms. Miller served as the Companys Director of
Marketing from January 1997. From 1992 to 1996, Ms. Miller
held various positions at Best Software, Inc., a developer of
corporate resource management applications, Abra Products
Division, including Public Relations Manager.
Laura Johnson has served as Senior Vice President, Product
Strategy since February 2004 and as Vice President, Product
Strategy from July 1998 through January 2004. From May 1996 to
July 1998, Ms. Johnson served as the Director of
Applications Consulting for the Company. From 1991 to 1996,
Ms. Johnson held various positions with Best Software,
Inc., Abra Products Division. Ms. Johnson holds a Certified
Payroll Professional (CPP) certification from the American
Payroll Association (APA).
Adam Rogers has served as Senior Vice President, Development
since December 2002. From July 2001 to December 2002,
Mr. Rogers served as Vice President of Engineering. From
May 1997 to July 2001, Mr. Rogers held various positions in
the Companys research and development organization,
including Director of Technical Support from October 1998 to
November 1999 and Director of Web Development from November 1999
to July 2001. Mr. Rogers is the son-in-law of Scott Scherr,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company.
Greg Swick has served as Senior Vice President, Sales since
January 2001. Mr. Swick served as Vice President and
General Manager of the PEO Division of the Companys sales
organization from November 1999 to January 2001. From February
1998 to November 1999, Mr. Swick was Director of Sales,
Northeast Division. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Swick
was President of The Ultimate Software Group of New York and New
England, G.P., a reseller of the Company which was acquired by
the Company in March 1998. From 1987 to 1994, Mr. Swick
held various positions with ADP, where the most recent position
was Area Vice President ADP Dealer Services Division.
Bill Hicks has served as Vice President, Chief Information
Officer since February 2004. From 1993 until February 2004,
Mr. Hicks held various positions in the management of
technologies for Precision Response Corporation, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Interactive Corporation and a provider of call
centers and online commerce customer care services, including
Chief Information Officer and Senior Vice President of
Technology from August 2000 until February 2004.
60
Roy L. Gerber, Ph.D. has served as Vice President, Chief
Technology Officer since January 1, 2002. Mr. Gerber
served as Vice President, Engineering from October 1999 through
December 31, 2001. From 1995 to October 1999,
Mr. Gerber served in various positions in the research and
development organization, including Director of Engineering.
Prior to joining the Company, from 1988 to 1995, Mr. Gerber
was Executive Vice President of Development for Cascade
Interactive Designs, Inc. and dBSi which developed and marketed
medical software products. From 1984 to 1988, Mr. Gerber
was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of
Pacific Retirement Plans, Inc.
James A. FitzPatrick, Jr. has served as a director of the
Company since July 2000. Mr. FitzPatrick is a partner in
the law firm Dewey Ballantine LLP, which provides legal services
to the Company. Before joining Dewey Ballantine LLP as a partner
in February 1989, Mr. FitzPatrick was a partner in the law
firm LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae.
LeRoy A. Vander Putten has served as a director of the Company
since October 1997, is Chairman of the Compensation Committee of
the Board and is a member of the Audit Committee of the Board.
Mr. Vander Putten has served as the Executive Chairman of
The Insurance Center, Inc., a holding company for 14 insurance
agencies, since October 2001. Previously, he served as the
Chairman of CORE Insurance Holdings, Inc., a member of the GE
Global Insurance Group, engaged in the underwriting of casualty
reinsurance, from August 2000 to August 2001. From April 1998 to
August 2000, he served as Chairman of Trade Resources
International Holdings, Ltd., a corporation engaged in trade
finance for exporters from developing countries. From January
1988 until May 1997, Mr. Vander Putten was Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer of Executive Risk Inc., a specialty
insurance holding company. From August 1982 to January 1988,
Mr. Vander Putten served as Vice President and Deputy
Treasurer of The Aetna Life and Casualty Company, an insurance
company.
Rick A. Wilber has served as a director of the Company since
October 2002 and is a member of the Audit Committee and a member
of the Compensation Committee of the Board. Mr. Wilber
formerly served on the Companys Board of Directors from
October 1997 through May 2000. Mr. Wilber is currently the
President of Lynns Hallmark Cards, which owns and operates
a number of Hallmark Card stores. Mr. Wilber was a
co-founder of Champs Sports Shops and served as its President
from 1974 to 1984. He served on the Board of Royce Laboratories,
a pharmaceutical concern, from 1990 until April 1997, when the
company was sold to Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a
pharmaceutical concern.
Robert A. Yanover has served as a director of the Company since
January 1997 and is Chairman of the Audit Committee and a member
of the Compensation Committee of the Board. Mr. Yanover
founded Computer Leasing Corporation of Michigan, a private
leasing company, in 1975 and has served as its President since
that time. Mr. Yanover also founded Lason, Inc., a
corporation specializing in the imaging business, and served as
Chairman of the Board from its inception in 1987 until 1998 and
as a director through February 2001.
Each officer serves at the discretion of the Board and holds
office until his or her successor is elected and qualified or
until his or her earliest resignation or removal.
Messrs. LeRoy A. Vander Putten and Robert A. Yanover serve
on the Board in the class whose term expires at the annual
meeting of the stockholders (the Annual Meeting) in
2005. Messrs. Marc D. Scherr, James A. FitzPatrick, Jr. and
Rick A. Wilber serve on the Board in the class whose term
expires at the Annual Meeting in 2006. Mr. Scott Scherr
serves on the Board in the class whose term expires at the
Annual Meeting in 2007.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics within the meaning of
Item 406 of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act. The
Companys Code of Ethics applies to its principal executive
officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting
officer. A copy of the Companys Code of Ethics is posted
on the Companys website at
www.ultimatesoftware.com. In the event that the Company
makes any amendments to, or grants any waiver from, a provision
of the Code of Ethics that requires disclosure under
Item 5.05 of Form 8-K, the Company will post such
information on its website.
61
Other Information
The information set forth in the Companys Proxy Statement
for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the headings
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance and Board Meetings and Committees of the
Board-Audit Committee, is incorporated by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the heading Executive
Compensation.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes the securities authorized for
issuance under the Companys equity compensation plans as
of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( a ) |
|
|
|
( c ) |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Number of Securities |
|
|
Securities to be |
|
( b ) |
|
Remaining Available for |
|
|
Issued upon |
|
Weighted Average |
|
Future Issuance under |
|
|
Exercise of |
|
Exercise Price of |
|
Equity Compensation |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Outstanding |
|
Plans (Excluding |
|
|
Options, Warrants |
|
Options, Warrants |
|
Securities Reflected in |
Plan Category |
|
and Rights |
|
and Rights |
|
Column(a)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
5,738,305 |
|
|
$ |
6.70 |
|
|
|
2,405,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,738,305 |
|
|
$ |
6.70 |
|
|
|
2,405,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The information set forth in the Companys Proxy Statement
for the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the heading
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management is incorporated by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the heading Certain
Related Transactions.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference to the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders under the heading KPMG LLP
Fees.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Documents filed as part of this report:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Financial Statements. The following financial statements of the
Company are included in Part II, Item 8, of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K: |
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
62
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity (Deficit)
for the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule: |
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-1 (File No. 333-47881), initially filed
March 13, 1998 (the Registration Statement) |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Series A Junior Preferred
Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the
Companys Current Report on Form 8-K dated
October 23, 1998) |
|
3 |
.3 |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.5 to the Registration Statement) |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Form of Certificate for the Common Stock, par value $0.01 per
share** |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Form of Warrant for Common Stock (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.4 to the Companys Registration Statement on
Form S-3 (File No. 333-107527), initially filed
July 31, 2003 |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Shareholders Rights Agreement, dated June 6, 1997 among the
Company and certain stockholders named therein** |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 2, 1998, among The
Ultimate Software Group of Virginia, Inc., the Company and
certain principals named therein** |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 2, 1998, among the
Company, The Ultimate Software Group of the Carolinas, Inc. and
certain principals name therein** |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
|
|
Asset Acquisition Agreement, dated February 20, 1998, among
the Company, The Ultimate Software Group of Northern California,
Inc. and certain principals named therein** |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement dated March 4, 1998, among the
Company, Ultimate Investors Group, Inc. and certain principals
name therein** |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated February 24, 1998, among
the Company, ULD Holding Corp., Ultimate Software Group of New
York and New England, G.P. and certain principals named therein
** |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated as of
December 20, 2002 (incorporated by reference to the
corresponding exhibit in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K dated March 31, 2003) |
|
10 |
.8 |
|
|
|
Commercial Office Lease agreement by and between UltiLand, Ltd.,
a Florida limited partnership, and the Company, dated
December 31, 1998 (incorporated by reference herein to
corresponding exhibit in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K dated March 31, 1999) |
63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.9 |
|
|
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 22, 1998, between the
Company and BankBoston, N.A., as Rights Agent. The Rights
Agreement includes the Form of Certificate of Designations of
Series A Junior Preferred Stock as Exhibit A, the Form
of Rights Certificate as Exhibit B, and the Summary of
Rights as Exhibit C (incorporated by reference herein to
Exhibit 2 to the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K dated October 23, 1998) |
|
10 |
.10 |
|
|
|
Commercial Office Lease by and between UltiLand, Ltd., a Florida
limited partnership and the Company, dated December 22,
1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated
August 15, 1999) |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
|
|
Letter Agreement between Aberdeen Strategic Capital LP and the
Company, dated October 21, 1999 (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q dated November 15, 1999) |
|
10 |
.12 |
|
|
|
Warrant issued to Aberdeen Strategic Capital LP (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q dated November 15, 1999) |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
|
|
Software License Agreement between the Company and Ceridian
Corporation dated as of March 9, 2001 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K dated March 27, 2001) |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
|
|
Letter amendment between the Company and Ceridian Corporation
dated as of August 9, 2001 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.14 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K dated March 29, 2002) |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
|
|
Letter amendment between the Company and Ceridian Corporation
dated as of February 5, 2002 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K dated March 29, 2002) |
|
10 |
.16 |
|
|
|
Loan and Security Agreement by and between the Company and
Silicon Valley Bank dated as of November 29, 2001
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K dated
March 29, 2002) |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
|
|
Revolving Promissory Note by and between the Company and Silicon
Valley Bank dated as of November 29, 2001 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K dated March 29, 2002) |
|
10 |
.18 |
|
|
|
Equipment Term Note by and between the Company and Silicon
Valley Bank dated as of November 29, 2001 (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 29, 2002) |
|
10 |
.19 |
|
|
|
Services Agreement between the Company and Ceridian Corporation
dated as of February 10, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
the corresponding exhibit in the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K dated March 31, 2003) |
|
10 |
.20 |
|
|
|
Third Loan Modification Agreement by and between the Company and
Silicon Valley Bank dated March 27, 2003 (incorporated by
reference to the corresponding exhibit in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K dated March 31, 2003) |
|
10 |
.21 |
|
|
|
Fourth Loan Modification Agreement by and between the Company
and Silicon Valley Bank dated as of April 29, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the
Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated
May 14, 2003) |
|
10 |
.22 |
|
|
|
Change in Control Bonus Plan for Executive Officers, effective
March 5, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q dated May 13, 2004) |
|
10 |
.23 |
|
|
|
Fifth Loan Modification Agreement by and between the Company and
Silicon Valley Bank dated as of May 28, 2004 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q dated August 12, 2004) |
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.24 |
|
|
|
Silicon Valley Bank Second Amended and Restated Revolving
Promissory Note by and between the Company and Silicon Valley
Bank dated May 28, 2004 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q dated August 12, 2004) |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Subsidiary of the Registrant** |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Consent of Registered Public Accounting Firm* |
|
31 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and
Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended* |
|
31 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and
Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended* |
|
32 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002* |
|
32 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002* |
|
99 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the Safe Harbor
Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995* |
|
|
** |
Incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit in the
Companys Registration Statement. |
65
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors
The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.:
Under date of March 10, 2005, we reported on the
consolidated balance sheets of The Ultimate Software Group, Inc.
and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004,
which reports appear in the December 31, 2004, Annual
Report on Form 10-K. In connection with our audits of the
aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also
audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule as
listed in Item 15 of this 10-K. This financial statement
schedule is the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial
statement schedule based on our audits.
In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
Miami, Florida
March 10, 2005
66
SCHEDULE II
THE ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charged to |
|
Write-offs |
|
|
|
|
Beginning of |
|
Expenses |
|
and |
|
Balance at |
Classification |
|
Year |
|
and Other |
|
Other |
|
End of Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
525 |
|
|
$ |
419 |
|
|
$ |
(444 |
) |
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
|
525 |
|
|
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
(3,122 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
27,959 |
|
|
$ |
3,218 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
31,177 |
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
24,233 |
|
|
|
3,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,959 |
|
|
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
18,461 |
|
|
|
5,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,233 |
|
67
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
THE ULTIMATE SOFTWARE GROUP, INC.
|
|
|
By: /s/ Mitchell K. Dauerman |
|
|
|
Mitchell K. Dauerman |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial |
|
Officer and Treasurer |
Date: March 10, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott Scherr
Scott
Scherr |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 10, 2005 |
|
/s/ Mitchell K.
Dauerman
Mitchell
K. Dauerman |
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 10, 2005 |
|
/s/ Marc D.
Scherr
Marc
D. Scherr |
|
Vice Chairman of the Board and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
March 10, 2005 |
|
/s/ James A.
FitzPatrick, Jr.
James
A. FitzPatrick, Jr. |
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2005 |
|
/s/ LeRoy A. Vander
Putten
LeRoy
A. Vander Putten |
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2005 |
|
/s/ Rick Wilber
Rick
Wilber |
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2005 |
|
/s/ Robert A.
Yanover
Robert
A. Yanover |
|
Director
|
|
March 10, 2005 |
68