Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-K

Commission File Number 1-14557

Jacuzzi Brands, Inc.

(561) 514-3838

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:    Yes þ        No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).    Yes þ        No o

     The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of April 3, 2004 (based on the last reported sale price of such stock on the New York Stock Exchange on such date) was approximately $673,869,299.

     As of November 30, 2004, the registrant had 76,103,459 shares of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

     Certain portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in connection with the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on February 10, 2005 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Report.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

PART I

      We, through our operating subsidiaries, are a leading global producer of branded bath and plumbing products for the residential, commercial and institutional markets. Our Bath Products segment manufactures whirlpool baths, spas, showers, sanitary ware, including sinks and toilets, and bathtubs for the construction and remodeling markets. Our Plumbing Products segment manufactures professional grade drainage, water control, commercial brass and PEX piping products for the commercial and institutional construction, renovation and facilities maintenance markets. Our Rexair segment manufactures premium vacuum cleaner systems that are sold in the direct sales retail channel.

      Our products are marketed through their widely recognized brand names, including JACUZZI®, SUNDANCE®, ELJER®, ZURN®, WILKINS^TM a Zurn company (“WILKINS^TM”) and RAINBOW®. Through the strength of these brands and the ability to leverage them effectively across multiple retail and wholesale distribution channels, we have built and maintained leadership positions within most of the markets we serve. The JACUZZI® and SUNDANCE® branded products hold leading positions in the whirlpool bath and spa markets in the U.S. and Europe, and the ZURN® branded products hold leading market positions in most of the domestic commercial and institutional markets they serve. Additionally, the RAINBOW® branded products hold a substantial market position in the premium direct sales vacuum cleaner market.

      We were originally incorporated in 1995 when we were spun-off from Hanson plc (“Hanson”). At that time, we had holdings in 34 diverse businesses, including Jacuzzi and Rexair. We subsequently merged with Zurn in 1998. In October 2003, we completed the asset disposal programs that transformed us from a diversified industrial conglomerate into a focused operating company primarily serving the home and building products markets. These dispositions included the disposals of our ladder business, our infant and children footwear business, our fire protection businesses, our European HVAC business and several other businesses in fiscal 2000. The disposal programs also included the disposals of Ames True Temper, Lighting Corporation of America, Selkirk and Spear & Jackson in fiscal 2002; SiTeco, our swimming pool and equipment and hearth businesses in fiscal 2003; and our water systems business in fiscal 2004. In fiscal 2003, we renewed our focus on operations by reorganizing our management structure to include a Chief Operating Officer.

      With the completion of our asset disposal programs and the reorganization of our management structure, we have largely completed our transformation into a focused operating company primarily serving the bath and plumbing products markets. During fiscal 2004, we initiated several plans to improve the operations of our Bath Products segment. These initiatives included plans to close or downsize inefficient facilities, outsourcing of products through lower cost suppliers, the rationalization of unprofitable product lines, and the further consolidation of functions into our shared services center in Dallas, TX. We continue to explore strategic alternatives to improve our operating efficiencies as we position ourselves to grow net sales and free cash flow at our core businesses.

      We operate on a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Saturday closest to September 30. Our public filings may be obtained through the Securities and Exchange Commission at its website at www.sec.gov, free of charge. Our Internet address is www.jacuzzibrands.com. We also make our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, available on our website, free of charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

      Financial information for the segments discussed below, including financial information by geographic areas, can be found in Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

1

Table of Contents

Bath Products Segment

      Our Bath Products segment manufactures and distributes whirlpool baths, spas, showers, sanitary ware, including sinks and toilets, and bathtubs for the domestic and international construction and remodeling markets.

      U.S. Bath Products. We distribute bath products throughout the U.S. primarily under the flagship JACUZZI® brand name and spas under the flagship SUNDANCE® brand name. We also offer a complete line of china bath products, whirlpool baths and sinks under the ELJER® brand name, and we sell less expensive bath products under the BATHCRAFT® and REDMONT® brand names.

      We distribute these products through multiple distribution channels. These channels include wholesalers such as Ferguson, Hughes and Hajoca; home centers such as The Home Depot, Lowe’s and Menards; and specialty kitchen, bath and spa retailers. Wholesalers distribute our bath products to homebuilders and building and plumbing contractors.

      The home center channel is an important channel for our domestic distribution of bath products. Our largest customer, The Home Depot, carries an extensive line of ELJER® branded sanitary ware products. Last year, we entered into a multi-year agreement to be the primary supplier of whirlpool baths to all of the more than 1,000 stores in the Lowe’s chain after a competitive product line review. Our product categories at Lowe’s also include JACUZZI® branded sanitary ware. We believe the strong brand power of the JACUZZI® name, our commitment to strong customer support programs and our broad product range were instrumental in our success in this review. This agreement had allowed us to expand our market share in the U.S. in the whirlpool bath category.

      Our spa products, SUNDANCE® and JACUZZI PREMIUM®, are primarily sold through our network of over 1,000 independent specialty retailers. We act as the exclusive supplier to a majority of these retailers, and we support them with extensive product training, comprehensive point-of-purchase marketing materials, advertising and a national warranty service support program. We have approximately 800 service centers, which perform service on our products and provide parts replacements. We serve mass merchant retailers primarily through private label offerings which provide them with brand exclusivity.

      The majority of the bath products we distribute in the U.S. are manufactured domestically. Our whirlpool baths and showers are principally manufactured in a facility in Chino, CA which replaced six older, decentralized California facilities in fiscal 2003. We also have a modern spa manufacturing facility in Chino, which began operating in 2001. These new facilities have enabled us to more effectively manage quality control and product improvement as well as cost reduction. We closed our spa manufacturing facility in Plant City, FL in November 2003, and the Chino facility began manufacturing these spas, without any interruption to our customers, in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. In addition, we closed our Salem, OH facility in fiscal 2004, which was over 90 years old and extremely costly to operate, and began outsourcing our enameled cast iron fixtures from an overseas supplier. In addition, we initiated plans to downsize our Ford City, PA sanitary ware plant in fiscal 2004, which is expected to be substantially completed by December 2004. Finally, in fiscal 2004, we announced plans that we expect to close our Tupelo, MS sanitary ware plant by June 2005. Despite our commitment to this market segment, we determined that it would be more cost effective to outsource these products through lower cost suppliers. We will continue to evaluate ways to further reduce costs at all of our manufacturing facilities and enhance the quality of our products.

      International Bath Products. We manufacture and distribute bath products in the same product categories in the European and other international construction and remodeling markets. For fiscal 2004, approximately 44% of our Bath Products segment net sales were derived from sales of bath products outside the U.S., most of which were in Europe. We offer our branded bath products in Europe under the following brand names: JACUZZI® and B.C. SANITAN® which serve premium retailers; FORDHAM® which serves the construction and builder markets; and NIAGARA® which serves wholesale distributors. We also market a full line of composite and stainless steel kitchen sinks under the ASTRACAST® brand name.

      Our bath products are distributed in Europe through home centers including B&Q, Homebase and Focus; wholesalers including the Wolseley Group, St. Gobain, Mark II and Travis Perkins Group; and specialty

2

Table of Contents

      We also sell our whirlpool bath, shower and spa products in South America and Asia under the JACUZZI® brand name. In South America, we distribute these locally manufactured products primarily through home centers, wholesalers and specialty kitchen and bath retailers. In Asia, we distribute these products primarily through specialty retailers and manufacture them mainly in the U.S. and Italy.

Plumbing Products Segment

      Our Plumbing Products segment manufactures and distributes professional grade drainage, water control, commercial brass and PEX piping products for the commercial and institutional construction, renovation and facilities maintenance markets. Demand for these products is influenced by regulatory, building and plumbing code requirements. Many of these products must meet detailed specifications set forth by plumbing engineers, architects and other building designers for commercial and institutional application.

      Our specification drainage and brass tubular products are sold under the ZURN® brand name. Our water control products, including the WILKINS^TM backflow preventer, are sold under the WILKINS^TM brand name. We market our sensor-operated flush valves and faucets and manual flush valves under the ZURN AQUAFLUSH® brand name and our heavy-duty commercial faucets under the ZURN AQUASPECS® brand name. Our PEX piping products are marketed as ZURN PEX® piping products.

      Product innovation is crucial in the commercial and institutional plumbing products markets since new products must continually be developed to meet specifications and regulatory demands. Our plumbing products are known in the industry for such innovation. For example, in 2004 we introduced the next generation automatic grease interceptor. This GRA “Grease Recovery Appliance” virtually eliminates all odors from the trap and makes grease disposal user friendly through the use of a quick-disconnect disposable grease collection container. Additionally, our new Electronic Solenoid Timer (EST), when utilized with our backflow preventer, provides an automatic shut off of the water supply during a reduced pressure backflow condition. Zurn One Systems, our latest innovation, provides a prepackaged set of bathroom fixtures and fittings needed for a complete installation.

      We distribute our branded products through independent sales representatives; wholesalers such as Ferguson, Hughes, and Hajoca; home centers such as The Home Depot and Lowe’s; and industry-specific distributors in the food service, industrial, janitorial and sanitation industries. Independent sales representatives work with wholesalers to assess and meet the needs of building contractors. They also combine knowledge of our products, installation and delivery with knowledge of the local markets to provide contractors with value added service. We use several hundred independent sales representatives nationwide, along with a network of approximately 80 warehouses, to provide our customers with 24-hour service and quick response times.

      In addition to our domestic manufacturing facilities, we have maintained a global network of independent sources that manufacture high quality, lower cost component parts for our commercial and institutional products. These sources fabricate parts to our specifications using our proprietary designs and enable us to focus on product engineering, assembly, testing and quality control. By closely monitoring these sources and through extensive product testing, we are able to maintain product quality and be a low-cost producer of commercial and institutional products.

Rexair Segment

      Our Rexair segment manufactures premium vacuum cleaner systems for the global direct sales market. The RAINBOW e² SERIES^TM is a full-service cleaning system that collects dirt particles by combining a distinctive water-based “separator” system with High Efficiency Particulate Air Filtration, or HEPA filter. This combination provides a technologically-superior alternative to traditional vacuum cleaners. The full system has optional accessories including the POWER NOZZLE®, a motorized power nozzle; the

3

Table of Contents

      We market our premium RAINBOW® vacuum cleaner system through an extensive network of independent distributors. Our products are sold to consumers through in-home demonstrations throughout the U.S. and in more than 70 other countries. We retain our distributor network by manufacturing high quality products, offering opportunity for advancement, recognizing superior performance through contests and our internal distributor magazine, and offering distributors business assistance and education. New distributors are added to our existing distribution network primarily by offering incentives to existing distributors to promote their sub-distributors or to find new distributors who will develop markets that are underutilized.

      We manufacture and assemble our products in Cadillac, MI. Our manufacturing staff frequently review our processes to improve manufacturing efficiencies. To contain costs, we purchase certain components from domestic and international sources.

Discontinued Operations

      In February 2003, our Board of Directors adopted a formal disposal plan to dispose of our swimming pool and equipment, hearth and water systems businesses. We completed the disposals of the swimming pool and equipment and hearth businesses in fiscal 2003, and completed the disposal of the water systems business in fiscal 2004. All of these businesses were previously included in our Bath Products segment.

      In December 2001, our Board of Directors approved a formal disposal plan in connection with our obligation to pay debt amortization as set forth in our then outstanding debt facilities. The disposal plan called for the sale of five businesses — Ames True Temper, Lighting Corporation of America, Selkirk, Spear & Jackson and SiTeco. We completed the disposals of all of the businesses in fiscal 2002 with the exception of SiTeco, which was completed in fiscal 2003. These businesses were previously included in our Lawn & Garden and Lighting segments.

      A discussion of these disposals can be found in Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Seasonality

      Demand for our products is primarily driven by new home starts, remodeling and construction activity. Accordingly, many external factors affect our business including weather and the impact of the broader economy on our end markets. Weather is an important variable for us as it significantly impacts construction. Spring and summer months in the U.S. and Europe represent the main construction season for new housing starts and remodeling, as well as increased construction in the commercial and institutional markets. As a result, sales in our Bath Products and Plumbing Products segments increase significantly in our third and fourth fiscal quarters as compared to the first two quarters of our fiscal year. The autumn and winter months generally impede construction and installation activity.

      Housing starts, consumer spending and remodeling expenditures have a major impact on our consumer-focused bath and spa business, which is served by our Bath Products segment. Our Plumbing Products business is dependent upon commercial and institutional construction activity and is therefore affected by macroeconomic factors such as the unemployment rate and the availability of financing. Despite the cyclical nature of the U.S. commercial and institutional construction market, which experienced declines in revenue potential of approximately 14% in fiscal 2002, approximately 6% in fiscal 2003 and a slight rebound in fiscal 2004, sales of our commercial and institutional products have continued to grow at a rate that exceeds that of the industry. We have achieved this growth through favorable pricing, product innovation and targeted marketing programs.

4

Table of Contents

Reliance on a Single Customer

      A single customer of the Bath Products segment, The Home Depot, accounted for 6%, 8% and 10% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. If we were to lose their business, it could have an adverse affect on our operating results.

Raw Materials, Energy and Suppliers

      We purchase a broad range of materials and components throughout the world in connection with our manufacturing activities in all of our segments. Major raw materials and components include acrylic, natural gas, stainless steel, brass, plastic molded parts, lumber and spa siding, electronics and pumps. Our policy is to maintain alternate sources of supply for our important materials and components wherever possible. We have been able to successfully apply this policy, and consequently we are not dependent on a single source for any raw material or component. The materials and components required for our manufacturing operations have been readily available, and we do not foresee any significant shortages.

Patents, Trademarks and Licenses

      We have in excess of 900 U.S. and foreign patents, patent applications and registered trademarks that relate to the products we manufacture and sell. We believe that certain trademarks including JACUZZI®, SUNDANCE®, BLUE RIDGE^TM, ELJER® and ASTRACAST® in our Bath Products segment; ZURN® and WILKINS^TM in our Plumbing Products segment and RAINBOW® in our Rexair segment are of material importance to our product lines. None of the material trademarks are of limited duration, and we believe our intellectual property is adequately protected in customary fashion under applicable law. Although protection of our patents and related technologies is an important component of our business strategy, none of the individual patents is material to our company as a whole.

Competition

      We sell all of our products in highly competitive markets. We compete in each of our markets based on product design, quality of products and services, product performance, distribution and price. Some of our competitors have greater financial, marketing, manufacturing and distribution resources than we do. Our principal competitors in the Bath Products segment are Kohler, American Standard, Crane, Roca, Teuce Sanitec, and Masco. Though the plumbing market is relatively fragmented, one competitor, Watts, competes with us across several lines. Sloan is a competitor in flush valves while Wirsbo is a competitor in PEX piping. Geberit is a competitor in commercial faucets. Competition for the Rexair segment is based primarily on the quality and features of the product and on sales technique and personnel, as well as marketing and distribution approaches. Rexair also experiences competition in recruiting its distributors, and distributors experience competition in recruiting and retaining sales representatives. Rexair’s most significant competitors are the Kirby division of Scott-Fetzer (a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.) and Electrolux, Inc. (U.S.A.).

Backlog

      Our backlog orders believed to be firm were $64.1 million and $59.5 million as of the end of fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003, respectively. The backlog orders are all in the Bath Products and Plumbing Products segments. Backlog is comprised of all open customer orders not yet shipped as of a particular date. For numerous reasons, including the timing of shipments, the product mix of, or adjustments to, customer orders and the mix of futures and at-once orders, our backlog as of any date may not be a reliable measure of sales or net income for future periods. We expect all of our backlog orders to be filled within one year.

Export and International Operations

      Certain of our domestic businesses generate revenue from export sales and/or revenue from operations conducted outside the U.S. Export sales amounted to 9%, 8% and 7% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, principally reflecting sales by Rexair to foreign distributors of RAINBOW®

5

Table of Contents

      Our export sales and international manufacturing and sourcing are subject to certain risks including currency fluctuation, transportation delays, political and economic instability, restrictions on the transfer of funds, the imposition of duties, tariffs and import and export controls and changes in governmental policies. We have numerous sourcing relationships with companies in Asia.

Employee Relations

      We employed approximately 5,929 persons at October 2, 2004, of whom approximately 1,622 were salaried employees. Unions represented approximately 17% of our employees. We currently have collective bargaining agreements with five union locals in North America, including one covering employees at our Tupelo plant, which is scheduled to close by June 2005. None of the collective bargaining contracts covering other North American locations are due to expire during fiscal 2005. We also have agreements covering employees at facilities in Brazil, Italy, Malta and the U.K. The agreements in Brazil and the U.K. are annual agreements. They cover approximately 127 and 48 employees, respectively. The agreement in Brazil expired October 31, 2004 and will be redefined during the negotiations with the Union which commenced in November 2004. The agreement in Italy, covering approximately 280 employees (65 of whom are members of a union), was renegotiated in May 2003. The first part of the contract, relating to norms and regulations, is valid until December 2006, and the second part of the contract, relating to compensation, is valid until December 2004. The agreement in Malta covers approximately 139 employees and expires in December 2004. We have not experienced any significant work stoppages in the last seven years with our ongoing businesses. We believe that our relations with our employees and unions are satisfactory.

Environmental Regulation

      We are subject to numerous foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations concerning such matters as zoning, health and safety and protection of the environment. Laws and regulations protecting the environment may in certain circumstances impose “strict liability,” rendering a person liable for environmental damage without regard to negligence or fault on the part of such person. In addition, from time to time, we may receive notices of violation or may be denied applications for environmental licenses or permits because the practices of the operating unit are not consistent with regulations or ordinances.

      Our subsidiaries have made capital and maintenance expenditures over time to comply with these laws and regulations. While the amount of expenditures in future years will depend on legal and technological developments which cannot be predicted at this time, these expenditures may progressively increase if regulations become more stringent. In addition, while future costs for compliance cannot be predicted with precision, no information currently available reasonably suggests that these expenditures will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

      We are investigating and remediating contamination at a number of present and former operating sites under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA” or “Superfund”), the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”) or comparable state statutes or agreements with third parties. These proceedings are in various stages ranging from initial investigations to active settlement negotiations to the cleanup of sites. We have been named as a potentially responsible party at a number of Superfund sites under CERCLA or comparable state statutes. Under these statutes, responsibility for the entire cost of cleanup of a contaminated site can be imposed upon any current or former site owner or operator, or upon any party who sent waste to the site, regardless of the lawfulness of the original activities that led to the contamination. No information currently available reasonably suggests that projected expenditures associated with any of these proceedings or any remediation

6

Table of Contents

      As of October 2, 2004, we had accrued approximately $4.2 million ($0.4 million accrued as current liabilities and $3.8 million as non-current liabilities), including $0.8 million for discontinued operations, for environmental liabilities. These amounts have not been discounted. We accrue an amount for each case when the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss associated with such unfavorable outcome is reasonably estimable. We believe that the range of liability for these matters could reach $16.7 million if it included cases where the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is only reasonably possible. We cannot predict whether future developments in laws and regulations concerning environmental protection or unanticipated enforcement actions will require material capital expenditures or otherwise affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows in a materially adverse manner, or whether our businesses will be successful in meeting future demands of regulatory agencies in a manner which will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Corporate Governance

      In accordance with the corporate governance rules of the New York Stock Exchange, we have adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines relating to certain key areas such as director qualifications and responsibilities, responsibilities of key board committees and director compensation. We have also adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for directors, officers and employees. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the charters of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee are published on our website. We will disclose any amendments to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics or waivers of any provision thereof on our website within four business days following the date of the amendment or waiver, and that information will remain available for at least a twelve-month period. We will provide any shareholder with printed versions of any of the foregoing guidelines, code or committee charters upon request.

Executive Officers

      Set forth below are the names, positions and ages, as of October 2, 2004, of our executive officers:

      David H. Clarke has served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since our spin-off from Hanson in 1995. Mr. Clarke was Vice Chairman of Hanson from 1993 until the spin-off, Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Hanson Industries from 1992 until the spin-off and a director of Hanson from 1989 until May 1996. Mr. Clarke is a director of Fiduciary Trust International, a company engaged in investment management and administration of assets for individuals, which is a subsidiary of Franklin Templeton Investments. Mr. Clarke is also a director of DOBI Medical International, Inc., which is developing an optical imaging system for cancer diagnosis, and United Pacific Industries Limited, which manufactures electronics and battery products in China.

      Donald C. Devine was named a director of our company in May 2004. Mr. Devine has served as our President and Chief Operating Officer since April 2003. Mr. Devine previously served in the capacity of

7

Table of Contents

      Steven C. Barre has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since September 2001. From April 2000 to September 2001, Mr. Barre served as our Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Prior to that date, Mr. Barre served as our Associate General Counsel beginning with our spin-off from Hanson in 1995.

      Jeffrey B. Park has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since April 2003 and Treasurer since February 2004. Mr. Park had served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Jacuzzi, Inc., one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, from August 2002 to April 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Park served as Vice President, Finance from April 2000 to August 2002 and Vice President, Corporate Controller from November 1986 to April 2000 of Gaylord Container Corporation.

      Diana E. Burton has served as our Vice President — Investor Relations since our spin-off from Hanson in 1995. Ms. Burton served as a consultant to Hanson Industries from January 1995 through February 1995, when she became an employee of a Hanson subsidiary. Ms. Burton was Vice President and Corporate Secretary of Marine Harvest, a publicly held aquaculture company, with principal responsibility for administration and investor relations, from September 1991 until its acquisition in November 1994.

      Francisco V. Puñal joined our company as Vice President of Finance in January 2001, and was promoted to Vice President and Corporate Controller in 2002. Mr. Puñal was previously associated with Vitas Healthcare Corporation, a privately held healthcare provider, where he was Vice President and Controller from 1997 to 2000. Prior to that, Mr. Puñal served as Director of Finance of Vitas Healthcare Corporation.

      Robert G. Hennemuth was named Vice President — Human Resources in July 2003. Mr. Hennemuth joined our Company from Honeywell International, formerly known as AlliedSignal Inc., where he served as Vice President of Human Resources & Communications for various businesses from December 1996 to June 2003, including Honeywell Consumer Products Group. Previously, Mr. Hennemuth was a corporate director of human resources at Raytheon Company from January 1988 to December 1996. While in that position, Mr. Hennemuth was responsible for labor strategies, management development, training, diversity and staffing.

8

Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

      The following risk factors and other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should be carefully considered. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we presently deem less significant may also impair our business operations. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results, cash flows and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

      Refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information and definitions related to our indebtedness.

      We are highly leveraged. We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. Our substantial indebtedness could interfere with our ability to operate our business. For example, it could:

	•	increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
	•	limit our ability to obtain additional financing;
	•	require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, reducing the amount of our cash flow available for other general corporate purposes, including capital expenditures, research and development efforts and working capital;
	•	require us to sell other securities or to sell some of our core assets, possibly on unfavorable terms, to meet payment obligations;
	•	restrict us from making strategic acquisitions, investing in new products or capital assets or taking advantage of business opportunities;
	•	limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate; and
	•	place us at a possible competitive disadvantage compared to less leveraged competitors.

      Our financing arrangements, including our bank facilities and the indenture governing the senior notes, contain various provisions that limit management’s discretion by restricting our ability to, among other things:

	•	incur additional debt or enter into sale-and-lease-back transactions;
	•	pay dividends or distributions on our capital stock or repurchase our capital stock;
	•	issue preferred stock of subsidiaries;
	•	make certain investments;
	•	create liens to secure debt;
	•	enter into transactions with affiliates;
	•	merge or consolidate with another company; and
	•	transfer and sell assets.

9

Table of Contents

      In addition, our bank facilities require that we meet specified financial ratios and tests. These restrictions could limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions or meet extraordinary capital needs or could otherwise restrict corporate activities.

      Upon our failure to comply with any of the covenants in our financing arrangements, the lenders under those agreements might be able (even without declaring a default) to cause us to use all of our available cash and free cash flow to service their indebtedness or otherwise prevent us from making payments of principal or interest on the senior notes. In addition, if following a default any of our lenders declares an event of default or accelerates our indebtedness, other creditors with cross default provisions in their debt instruments may be able to declare a default and accelerate their indebtedness. If any of our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not have sufficient funds available to make the required payments under our indebtedness.

      Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, including the senior notes, and to fund operations will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. Our ability to generate cash is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, business and other factors that are beyond our control.

      Our historical financial results have been, and we anticipate that our future financial results will be, subject to fluctuations. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flows from operations, that currently anticipated cost savings and operating improvements will be realized on schedule or that future borrowings will be available to us under our credit facilities or otherwise in amounts sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness, including the senior notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs. If we are unable to meet our debt obligations or fund our other liquidity needs, we may need to restructure or refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness, on or before maturity. We cannot assure you that we will be able to restructure or refinance any of our indebtedness on satisfactory terms, if at all, which could cause us to default on our obligations and impair our liquidity. Our ability to restructure or refinance our debt will depend on the condition of the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more restrictive covenants, which could further restrict our business operations.

Risks Related to Our Business

      Our businesses experience seasonal business swings. We experience downturns in the autumn and winter months of the northern hemisphere, which encompasses the vast majority of our markets. This seasonality requires us to manage our cash flows over the course of the year. If our sales were to fall substantially below what we would normally expect during certain periods, our annual financial results would be adversely impacted and our ability to service our debt may also be adversely affected.

      Demand for our products is primarily driven by new home starts, remodeling and construction activity. Weather is an important variable affecting our financial performance as it significantly impacts construction activity. Spring and summer months in the U.S. and Europe represent the main construction season for new housing starts and remodeling, as well as increased construction in the commercial and institutional markets. However, adverse weather conditions, such as prolonged periods of cold or rain, blizzards, hurricanes and other severe weather patterns, could delay or halt construction and remodeling activity. For example, an unusually severe winter can lead to reduced construction activity and magnify the seasonal decline in our net sales and earnings during the winter months. In addition, a prolonged winter season can delay construction and remodeling plans and hamper the seasonal increase in our net sales and earnings during the spring months.

10

Table of Contents

      Many customers who purchase building and home improvement products and our other products depend on financing either by independent consumer finance companies or, to a lesser extent, by independent distributors in order to make purchases. Fluctuations in the prevailing interest rates could affect the availability and cost of financing to our customers. The lack of availability of consumer credit could lead to a reduction in demand for our products and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

      Demand in the building and home improvement product industries is influenced by new construction activity and the level of repair and remodeling activity. The level of new construction and repair and remodeling activity is affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including the overall strength of the U.S. economy (including confidence in the U.S. economy by our customers), the strength of the residential and commercial real estate markets, institutional building activity, the age of existing housing stock, unemployment rates and interest rates. Any declines in new housing or commercial construction starts or demand for replacement building and home improvement products may adversely impact us, and there can be no assurance that any such adverse effects would not be material and would not continue for an indeterminate period of time. Further, while we attempt to minimize our exposure to economic or market fluctuations by serving a balanced mix of end markets and geographic regions, we cannot assure you that a significant or sustained downturn in a specific end market or geographic region would not have a material adverse effect on us.

      We compete against both large international and national rivals, as well as many regional competitors. Some of our competitors have greater financial, marketing and distribution resources than we do. Significant competition in any given market can result in substantial pressure on our pricing and profit margins, thereby adversely affecting our financial results. As a result of pricing pressures, we may in the future experience reductions in profit margins. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or increase the current market share of our products successfully in the future.

      We have certain customers, such as The Home Depot, Lowe’s and Ferguson that are very important to our business and the successful implementation of our business strategy. Our competitors may adopt more aggressive sales policies and devote greater resources to the development, promotion and sale of their products than we do, which could result in a loss of customers. The loss of one or more of our major customers or deterioration in our relationship with any of them could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

      We purchase most of the raw materials for our products on the open market, and rely on third parties for the sourcing of certain finished goods. Accordingly, our cost of products may be affected by changes in the market price of raw materials or sourced components or finished goods. In addition, our operating costs for our Bath Products and Plumbing Products segments are also significantly affected by the cost of natural gas used for fuel and the cost of electricity. Natural gas and electricity prices have historically been volatile, particularly in California where we have a significant manufacturing presence. We do not generally engage in commodity hedging transactions for raw materials. Significant increases in the prices of raw materials, sourced components or finished goods or other commodities could require us to increase the prices of our products, which may reduce consumer demand for our products or make us more susceptible to competition.

11

Table of Contents

      We have significant operations outside the U.S. We currently have operations in Europe, Asia, Canada and South America, with approximately 22% of our assets (excluding assets held for sale) located outside the U.S. as of the end of fiscal 2004. Further, certain of our businesses obtain raw materials and finished goods from foreign suppliers. Accordingly, our business is subject to the political, economic and other risks that are inherent in operating in numerous countries. These risks include:

	•	the difficulty of enforcing agreements and collecting receivables through foreign legal systems;
	•	trade protection measures and import or export licensing requirements;
	•	tax rates in certain foreign countries that exceed those in the U.S. and the imposition of withholding requirements on foreign earnings;
	•	the imposition of tariffs, exchange controls or other restrictions;
	•	difficulty in staffing and managing widespread operations and the application of foreign labor regulations;
	•	required compliance with a variety of foreign laws and regulations; and
	•	changes in general economic and political conditions in countries where we operate, particularly in emerging markets.

      Our business success depends in part on our ability to anticipate and effectively manage these and other risks. We cannot assure you that these and other factors will not have a material adverse effect on our international operations or on our business as a whole.

      We conduct operations in and generate sales from many areas of the world involving transactions denominated in a variety of currencies. We are subject to currency exchange rate risk to the extent that our costs are denominated in currencies other than those in which we earn revenues. In addition, since our financial statements are denominated in U.S. dollars, changes in currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies have had, and will continue to have, an impact on our earnings. We cannot assure you that currency exchange rate fluctuations will not adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

      We also face risks arising from the imposition of exchange controls and currency devaluations. Exchange controls may limit our ability to convert foreign currencies into U.S. dollars or to remit dividends and other payments by our foreign subsidiaries or businesses located in or conducted within a country imposing controls. Currency devaluations result in a diminished value of funds denominated in the currency of the country instituting the devaluation. Actions of this nature, if they occur or continue for significant periods of time, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition in any given period.

      Zurn Industries, Inc. (“Zurn”) operates as one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. Zurn, along with many other unrelated companies, is a co-defendant in numerous asbestos related lawsuits pending in the U.S. Plaintiffs’ claims primarily allege personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos used primarily in industrial boilers formerly manufactured by a segment of Zurn that has been accounted for as a discontinued operation. Zurn did not manufacture asbestos or asbestos components. Instead, Zurn purchased it from suppliers.

12

Table of Contents

      Federal legislation has been proposed that would remove asbestos claims from the current tort system and place them in a trust fund system. This trust would be funded by the insurers and defendant companies. There can be no assurance as to when or if this or any other legislation will be passed and become law or what, if any, the financial impact it could have on Zurn.

      Since Zurn received its first asbestos claim in the 1980s, Zurn has paid or dismissed or agreed to settle or dismiss approximately 100,600 asbestos claims including dismissals or agreements to dismiss of approximately 10,600 of such claims through the end of fiscal 2004 compared to 84,000 and 6,400 claims, respectively, through the end of fiscal 2003.

      Zurn engaged an independent economic consulting firm to assist in the estimation of Zurn’s potential asbestos liability. At October 2, 2004, that firm estimated that Zurn’s potential liability for asbestos claims pending against it and for claims estimated to be filed through 2014 is approximately $171 million, of which Zurn expects to pay approximately $127.6 million through 2014 on such claims with the balance of the estimated liability being paid in subsequent years. This asbestos liability estimate was based on the current and anticipated number of future asbestos claims, the timing and amounts of asbestos payments, the status of ongoing litigation and the potential impact of defense strategies and settlement initiatives. However, there are inherent uncertainties involved in estimating the number of future asbestos claims, future settlement costs, and the effectiveness of Zurn’s defense strategies and settlement initiatives. In addition, Zurn’s current estimate could be adversely affected due to changes in law and other factors beyond its control. Further, while Zurn’s current asbestos liability is based on an estimate of claims through 2014, such liability may continue beyond 2014, and such liability could be substantial.

      Zurn estimates that its available insurance to cover its potential asbestos liability as of October 2, 2004 is approximately $302.1 million. Zurn believes, based on its experience in defending and dismissing such claims and the coverage available, that it has sufficient insurance to cover the pending and reasonably estimable future claims. This conclusion was reached after considering Zurn’s experience in asbestos litigation, the insurance payments made to date by Zurn’s insurance carriers, existing insurance policies, the industry ratings of the insurers and the advice of insurance coverage counsel with respect to applicable insurance coverage law relating to the terms and conditions of those policies. As of October 2, 2004, Zurn recorded a receivable from its insurance carriers of $171 million, which corresponds to the amount of Zurn’s potential asbestos liability that is covered by available insurance and is probable of recovery.

      However, there is no assurance that this amount of insurance will ultimately be available or that Zurn’s asbestos liabilities will not ultimately exceed the amount of coverage. Factors that could cause a decrease in the amount of available coverage include changes in law governing the policies, potential disputes with the carriers on the scope of coverage, and insolvencies of one or more of Zurn’s carriers.

      Our past and present business operations and our past and present ownership and operation of real property are subject to extensive and changing federal, state, local and foreign environmental laws and regulations pertaining to the discharge of materials into the environment, the generation, storage, use, transportation, handling and disposal of wastes (including solid and hazardous wastes) and the exposure to hazardous substances. If our operating units fail to completely comply with these laws and regulations, we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned or we could incur liability for cleanup costs or other damages. Changes in environmental regulations or their interpretation, or other unanticipated events may also give rise to increased expenditures or liabilities.

      We are investigating and remediating contamination at a number of present and former operating sites and we have been named as a potentially responsible party at a number of Superfund sites pursuant to CERCLA, RCRA or comparable state statutes. Our actual costs to clean up these sites may exceed our current estimates due to factors beyond our control, such as the discovery of presently unknown environmental conditions, changes in environmental laws and regulations and the insolvency of other responsible parties at the sites at which we are involved.

13

Table of Contents

      We believe that a number of our U.S. and foreign patents, patent applications and registered trademarks are important to our success, potential growth and competitive position. Our actions to establish and protect our trademarks and other proprietary rights, however, may not prevent imitation of our products by others or prevent others from claiming violations of their trademarks and proprietary rights by us. Any infringement or related claims, even if not meritorious, may be costly and time consuming to defend, may distract management from our business and may result in the loss of significant financial and managerial resources.

      Our success depends in part on our ability to attract, hire, train and retain qualified managerial, marketing and sales resources, including, in the case of our Rexair segment, our independent distributors. The market for these resources is competitive. We may be unsuccessful in attracting and retaining the resources we require to generate sales and to expand our operations successfully, and, in such event, our business could be materially and adversely affected. In particular, in our Rexair segment, we have historically relied on a select group of independent distributors to generate a significant portion of our sales. A loss of one or more of these distributors could have a material adverse effect on our operating results for the Rexair segment. Our success also depends to a significant extent on the continued service of our senior management team. The loss of any member of our senior management team could impair our ability to execute our business plan and could therefore have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

      As of October 2, 2004, approximately 17% of our employees in the U.S. and abroad were represented by labor unions. While we believe our relations with our employees are satisfactory, a lengthy work stoppage at any of our facilities could have a material adverse effect on us. The collective bargaining agreements with five local unions in North America (covering 751 employees) are due for renegotiation in fiscal 2006 and 2010. Four foreign agreements will expire through the end of calendar year 2005. Two agreements expire in December 2004 (covering approximately 204 employees), one agreement expires in May 2005 (covering approximately 48 employees) and another agreement will expire in October 2005 (covering approximately 127 employees). Negotiations for the extension of these agreements may result in modifications to the terms of these agreements, and these modifications could cause us to incur increased costs relating to our labor force.

14

Table of Contents

      We lease approximately 13,783 square feet of office space for our headquarters in West Palm Beach, Florida. The principal properties of each of our operating companies as of October 2, 2004, and the location, primary use, approximate square footage and ownership status, are set forth below:

15

Table of Contents

      In addition, we lease sales office space in Idaho Falls, Idaho; Addison, Illinois; Singapore; Nice, France; Lohne, Germany; Rome, Italy; Barcelona, Spain; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Taipei, R.O.C.; Dubai, UAE and Bensheim, Germany. We also own several properties being held for sale in: Plant City, Florida; Waynesboro, Georgia; Thomasville, North Carolina; Milford, Virginia; and Itu, Brazil.

      We and our subsidiaries are parties to legal proceedings that we believe to be either ordinary, routine litigation incidental to the business of present and former operations or immaterial to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

      Certain of our subsidiaries are defendants or plaintiffs in lawsuits that have arisen in the normal course of business. While certain of these matters involve substantial amounts, it is management’s opinion, based on the advice of counsel, that the ultimate resolution of such litigation and environmental matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

      Litigation resulting from a dispute with the former owners of the Sundance Spas business has resulted in a judgment of approximately $5.1 million in our favor. The gain of $3.9 million resulting from the judgment is not included in the results of our operations in fiscal 2004 as it is still subject to appeal.

      In June 1998, we merged with Zurn, which now operates as one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. At the time of our acquisition, Zurn had itself owned various subsidiaries. Zurn, along with many other unrelated companies, is a co-defendant in numerous asbestos related lawsuits pending in the U.S. Plaintiffs’ claims primarily allege personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos used primarily in industrial boilers formerly manufactured by a segment of Zurn that has been accounted for as a discontinued operation. Zurn did not manufacture asbestos or asbestos components. Instead, Zurn purchased it from suppliers.

      Federal legislation has been proposed that would remove asbestos claims from the current tort system and place them in a trust fund system. This trust would be funded by the insurers and defendant companies. There can be no assurance as to when or if this or any other legislation will be passed and become law or what, if any, the financial impact it could have on Zurn.

      New claims filed against Zurn in fiscal 2004 were lower year-over-year. During fiscal 2004, approximately 25,000 new asbestos claims were filed against Zurn versus 32,400 in fiscal 2003. As of October 2, 2004, the number of asbestos claims pending against Zurn was approximately 75,500 compared to 59,000 as of September 27, 2003. The increase in pending claims is a result of new claims exceeding the number of claims newly resolved during the period. The claims are handled pursuant to a defense strategy funded by Zurn’s insurers. The pending claims against Zurn as of October 2, 2004 were included in approximately 5,872 lawsuits, in which Zurn and an average of 85 other companies are named as defendants, and which cumulatively allege damages of approximately $10.3 billion against all defendants. Defense costs currently do not erode the coverage amounts in the insurance policies, although a few policies that will be accessed in the future may count defense costs toward aggregate limits.

16

Table of Contents

      During fiscal 2004 and as of the end of such period, approximately 26,000 claims were paid and/or pending payment and approximately 4,900 claims were dismissed and/or pending dismissal. During fiscal 2003 and as of the end of such period, approximately 45,000 claims were paid and/or pending payment and approximately 3,000 claims were dismissed and/or pending dismissal. Since Zurn received its first asbestos claim in the 1980s, Zurn has paid or dismissed or agreed to settle or dismiss approximately 100,600 asbestos claims including dismissals or agreements to dismiss of approximately 10,600 of such claims through the end of fiscal 2004 compared to 84,000 and 6,400 claims, respectively, through the end of fiscal 2003.

      Zurn engaged an independent economic consulting firm with substantial experience in asbestos liability valuations to assist in the estimation of Zurn’s potential asbestos liability. At October 2, 2004, that firm estimated that Zurn’s potential liability for asbestos claims pending against it and for claims estimated to be filed through 2014 is approximately $171 million. That firm estimated Zurn will pay approximately $127.6 million through 2014 on such claims, with the balance of the estimated liability being paid in subsequent years. As discussed below in more detail, Zurn expects all such payments to be paid by its carriers. The estimated liability of $171 million is comprised of approximately (i) $12 million in claims that had been settled but unpaid as of the end of fiscal 2004; (ii) $26 million in proposed settlements of certain pending and future claims; and (iii) $133 million for other pending and future claims. At September 27, 2003, it was estimated that Zurn’s potential liability for asbestos claims pending against it and for claims estimated to be filed through 2013 was approximately $160 million.

      These asbestos liability estimates were based on the current and anticipated number of future asbestos claims, the timing and amounts of asbestos payments, the status of ongoing litigation and the potential impact of defense strategies and settlement initiatives. However, there are inherent uncertainties involved in estimating the number of future asbestos claims, future settlement costs, and the effectiveness of Zurn’s defense strategies and settlement initiatives. In addition, Zurn’s current estimate could be adversely affected due to changes in law and other factors beyond its control. As a result, Zurn’s actual liability could exceed Zurn’s estimate described herein.

      Zurn’s current estimate of its asbestos liability of $171 million for claims filed through 2014 assumes that (i) its continuous vigorous defense strategy will remain effective; (ii) new asbestos claims filed annually against it will decline modestly through 2014; (iii) the values by disease will remain consistent with past experience; and (iv) its insurers will continue to pay defense costs without eroding the coverage amounts of its insurance policies. While Zurn believes there is evidence, in recent claims settlements, for such an impact of a successful defense strategy, if the defense strategy ultimately is not successful to the extent assumed by Zurn, the severity and frequency of asbestos claims could increase substantially above Zurn’s estimates. Further, while Zurn’s current asbestos liability is based on an estimate of claims through 2014, such liability may continue beyond 2014, and such liability could be substantial.

      Zurn estimates that its available insurance to cover its potential asbestos liability as of October 2, 2004 is approximately $302.1 million. Zurn estimated that its available insurance to cover its potential asbestos liability as of September 27, 2003 was approximately $314.0 million. The decrease in the amount of available insurance reflects the payments made during fiscal 2004 offset by a credit in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 of approximately $1.5 million from the carriers relating to claims processed in prior periods. Zurn believes, based on its experience in defending and dismissing such claims and the coverage available, that it has sufficient insurance to cover the pending and reasonably estimable future claims. This conclusion was reached after considering Zurn’s experience in asbestos litigation, the insurance payments made to date by Zurn’s insurance carriers, existing insurance policies, the industry ratings of the insurers and the advice of insurance coverage counsel with respect to applicable insurance coverage law relating to the terms and conditions of those policies. As of October 2, 2004 and September 27, 2003, Zurn recorded a receivable from its insurance carriers of $171 million and $160 million, respectively, which corresponds to the amount of Zurn’s potential asbestos liability that is covered by available insurance and is probable of recovery.

      However, there is no assurance that $302.1 million of insurance coverage will ultimately be available or that Zurn’s asbestos liabilities will not ultimately exceed this amount. Factors that could cause a decrease in

17

Table of Contents

      Principally as a result of the past insolvency of certain of Zurn’s insurance carriers, coverage analysis reveals that certain gaps exist in Zurn’s insurance coverage, but only if and after Zurn uses approximately $230.1 million of its remaining approximate $302.1 million of insurance coverage. As noted above, the estimate of Zurn’s potential liability for asbestos claims pending against it and for claims estimated to be filed through 2014 is $171 million with the expected amount to be paid through 2014 being $127.6 million. In order to use approximately $277.1 million of the $302.1 million of its insurance coverage from solvent carriers, Zurn estimates that it would need to satisfy approximately $14 million of asbestos claims, with additional gaps of $80 million layered within the final $25 million of the $302.1 million of coverage. We will pursue, if necessary, any available recoveries on our approximately $148 million of coverage with insolvent carriers, which includes approximately $83 million of coverage attributable to the gaps discussed above. These estimates are subject to the factors noted above.

      After review of the foregoing with Zurn and its consultants, we believe that the resolution of Zurn’s pending and reasonably estimable asbestos claims will not have a material adverse effect on Zurn’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

      We did not submit any matter to a vote of security holders during the last quarter of fiscal 2004.

PART II

      (a) Market Information.

      Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol JJZ. The following table sets forth, for the fiscal periods indicated, the high and low closing sales price per share of common stock as reported by the NYSE.

      (b) Holders.

      As of November 30, 2004, there were approximately 18,009 record holders of our common stock.

      (c) Dividends.

      We have not paid cash dividends in the past three fiscal years. Our bank facilities include a restriction on the payment of dividends (See Liquidity and Capital Resources in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

      (d) Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

18

Table of Contents

      The following table sets forth information, as of the end of fiscal year 2004, with respect to our compensation plans under which shares of our common stock is or was authorized for issuance and is outstanding:

(1)	Excluding securities reflected in Column (a).

      Our business has undergone significant changes during the last five years. Accordingly, results from any one period may not be comparable to results from any other year. The following matters affect the comparability of the selected financial data included in the table that follows.

      Operating income in fiscal 2004 includes impairment, restructuring, and other charges of $22.3 million related to plant closure and downsizing initiatives as well as the continued consolidation of administrative functions into our shared services center.

      Net sales in fiscal 2003 include $8.6 million from the sale of a license for certain patented technology. Operating income in fiscal 2003 includes impairment, restructuring and other charges of $19.9 million. Income from continuing operations in fiscal 2003 includes pre-tax charges of $21.5 million associated with the extension and eventual refinancing of our debt in July 2003. Income from continuing operations also includes a tax benefit of $13.6 million recorded as a result of an IRS audit settlement.

      Operating income in fiscal 2002 includes impairment, restructuring and other charges of $7.2 million. Income from continuing operations in fiscal 2002 includes $9.2 million of pre-tax charges related to financing initiatives. Also, we recorded a tax benefit of $29.6 million in fiscal 2002 largely attributable to the utilization of loss carry backs.

      Operating loss in fiscal 2001 includes impairment, restructuring and other charges of $100.2 million. Loss from continuing operations in fiscal 2001 includes pre-tax charges of $45.1 million related to the impairment of note securities, $23.6 million associated with the restructuring of our debt and $8.1 million for professional fees associated with the previously planned spin-off of a group of our businesses.

      Financial data in fiscal 2000 includes Rexair and several other businesses which were sold in March 2000. We repurchased Rexair in August 2001. Operating income in fiscal 2000 includes impairment, restructuring and other charges of $79.6 million. Income from continuing operations in fiscal 2000 includes a pre-tax gain of $39.3 million on the sale of businesses. In addition, fiscal 2000 results include a $20.0 million reversal of tax contingencies related to our spin-off from Hanson.

      Operating (loss) income for fiscal 2001 and 2000 includes goodwill amortization of $9.5 million and $13.0 million, respectively. We stopped amortizing goodwill after adoption of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and other Intangible Assets, on October 1, 2001.

      In March 2001, the Board of Directors indefinitely suspended the quarterly payment of cash dividends. Furthermore, our bank facilities include a restriction on the payment of dividends (See Liquidity and Capital Resources under Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

19

Table of Contents

      The following table presents summary historical consolidated financial data. The summary consolidated financial data for the fiscal years 2004, 2003 and 2002 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should read the following summary consolidated financial data in conjunction with Items 7 and 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

20

Table of Contents

Overview

      We are a leading global producer of branded bath and plumbing products for the residential, commercial and institutional markets. We currently operate as three business segments, consisting of the Bath Products segment, the Plumbing Products segment and the Rexair segment. Our Bath Products segment manufactures whirlpool baths, spas, showers, sanitary ware, including sinks and toilets, and bathtubs for the construction and remodeling markets. Our Plumbing Products segment manufactures professional grade drainage, water control, commercial brass and PEX piping products for the commercial and institutional construction, renovation and facilities maintenance markets. Our Rexair segment manufactures premium vacuum cleaner systems sold through independent distributors in the direct sales retail channel.

      Demand for our products is primarily driven by new home starts, remodeling and commercial construction activity. Accordingly, many external factors affect our business including weather and the impact of the broader economy on our end markets. Weather is an important variable for us as it significantly impacts construction. Spring and summer months in the U.S. and Europe represent the main construction season for new housing starts and remodeling, as well as increased construction in the commercial and institutional markets. As a result, sales in our Bath Products and Plumbing Products segments increase in our third and fourth fiscal quarters as compared to the first two quarters of our fiscal year. The autumn and winter months generally impede construction and installation activity.

      Housing starts, consumer spending and remodeling expenditures have a major impact on our consumer-focused bath and spa businesses, which are included in our Bath Products segment. Our Plumbing Products business is dependent upon commercial and institutional construction activity and is therefore affected by macroeconomic factors such as the unemployment rate and the availability of financing. Despite the cyclical nature of the U.S. commercial and institutional construction market, which experienced declines in revenue potential of approximately 14% in fiscal 2002, approximately 6% in fiscal 2003 and a slight rebound in fiscal 2004, sales of our commercial and institutional products have continued to grow at a rate that exceeds that of the industry. We have achieved this growth through favorable pricing, product innovation and targeted marketing programs.

      During fiscal 2004, we initiated several plans to improve the operations of our Bath Products segment. These initiatives include the downsizing of our manufacturing plant in Ford City, PA, which is expected to be substantially completed by December 2004, plans to close our manufacturing plant in Tupelo, MS by June 2005, the outsourcing of products through lower cost suppliers, the rationalization of unprofitable product lines, and the further consolidation of selling and administrative functions into our shared services center in Dallas, TX. In the first half of fiscal 2003, we combined six separate operating facilities into one new facility in Chino, CA. Additionally, we adopted a number of efficiency enhancing manufacturing techniques, including lean manufacturing, which have served to enhance our operations. We also closed our manufacturing plants in Plant City, FL and Salem, OH. The Plant City plant, which manufactured spas, was closed in November 2003. The Salem plant, which manufactured cast iron sanitary ware ceased production in May 2004. These restructuring initiatives are discussed in more detail in Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

      We continue to evaluate strategies to improve the operating results of our Bath Product segment. The implementation of any additional performance improvement strategies may result in our recording impairment, restructuring and other charges in future periods.

      Our Board of Directors approved a formal disposal plan for the sale of five businesses in December 2001 (the “2001 Disposal Plan”) and a formal disposal plan for the sale of three businesses in February 2003 (the “2003 Disposal Plan”). We have completed the sale of all businesses under both disposal plans.

21

Table of Contents

      Each of these disposal plans qualified for treatment as discontinued operations, and accordingly, are not included in our discussion of Results of Operations of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Summarized results of the discontinued operations through the dates of sale are as follows:

      The decrease in net sales and operating (loss) income from fiscal 2002 to fiscal 2003 is primarily the result of the lost contribution from the businesses sold in accordance with the 2001 Disposal Plan. Prior to their disposal dates, these businesses contributed $714.1 million of net sales and $31.7 million of operating income in fiscal 2002, while only contributing $7.7 million of net sales and an operating loss of $0.4 million in fiscal 2003. Net sales and operating (loss) income in fiscal 2003 also decreased from the prior year, but to a lesser extent, because of the sale of the businesses in the 2003 Disposal Plan. Prior to their disposal dates, these businesses contributed $93.2 million of net sales and $3.0 million of operating income in fiscal 2002, while only contributing $59.2 million of net sales and an operating loss of $0.3 million in fiscal 2003. The only business contributing to fiscal 2004 was the water systems business, which was sold within the first month of the year.

Results of Operations

      The following table presents our results of operations by segment for the periods indicated. Certain amounts reported for the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation.

      Overall, net sales increased 13.0% to $1.35 billion in fiscal year 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003. The increase reflects strong sales in our Bath Products and Plumbing Products segments. Fiscal 2003 results include $8.6 million in sales recognized upon the granting of a license for certain technology that had been the subject of patent litigation. Operating income increased $15.3 million or 18.8% in fiscal 2004 when compared to fiscal 2003 primarily due to strong operating results in our Bath Products segment. Included in

22

Table of Contents

      Net sales in our Bath Products segment increased $120.5 million or 14.8% in fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003. The increase was the primarily the result of continued growth in the domestic spa and bath businesses, due to an expanded specialty retailer base, as well as growth in the European bath and sink businesses, which was primarily the result of continued higher sales to the home center channel. Fiscal 2004 sales also included a $38.3 million benefit from favorable currency exchange rates mainly due to the firming of the British pound and the euro against the U.S. dollar. Sales growth in fiscal 2004 was partially offset by a decrease in sales at Eljer, as a result of the rationalization of unprofitable product lines.

      Operating income of $26.5 million for fiscal 2004 increased $19.1 million or 258.1% compared to fiscal 2003, due primarily to strong sales and margin growth in the domestic spa and whirlpool bath businesses. Gross margin increased as a percentage of net sales mainly due to increased volume over fixed overhead and improved manufacturing efficiencies. These efficiencies were experienced segment-wide, but especially in the new Chino, CA plant which became operational in fiscal 2003. Strong earnings growth was accomplished despite an increase in restructuring charges from $14.6 million in fiscal 2003 to $22.9 million in fiscal 2004, as discussed more fully in Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Fiscal 2004 was also impacted by a $1.0 million write off of accounts receivable associated with the bankruptcy of a domestic distributor, a $4.1 million increase in our bad debt reserves associated with financial difficulties encountered by several Brazilian bath product distributors and $1.0 million in severance related to staffing reductions in Brazil. In fiscal 2003, we also established a $2.5 million bad debt reserve against a receivable from one of the same Brazilian distributors. We have since taken over sales responsibility for the Brazilian home center channel, and expect this action to result in improved sales, margins and customer service for this segment as we are now directly in control of sales into this channel. Operating income in fiscal 2003 was negatively impacted by the aforementioned restructuring charges as well as labor inefficiencies and start up costs related to the move to a new whirlpool bath manufacturing facility in Chino, CA, costs of process improvements to enhance quality and future operating efficiencies at the new Chino, CA plant, costs related to the Lowe’s roll-out, increased marketing expenses and escalating costs associated with our cast iron and sanitary ware businesses. Favorable currency exchange rates improved earnings in fiscal 2004 when compared to fiscal 2003 by $3.9 million.

      Net sales in the Plumbing Products segment increased $31.4 million or 11.4% in fiscal 2004 when compared with fiscal 2003. Sales in fiscal 2004 increased as a result of continued market penetration particularly in the PEX and commercial Brass product lines. Sales in these product lines were driven by superior sensor technology and the market’s continued conversion of copper pipe to PEX tubing in plumbing applications. Fiscal 2003 sales included $8.6 million from the sale of a license for technology that had been the subject of patent litigation.

      Operating income decreased $1.4 million or 2.3% in fiscal 2004 as compared to fiscal 2003. Excluding the $8.6 million gain on the sale of the technology license in fiscal 2003, operating income increased in fiscal 2004 as a result of improved sales and favorable pricing, which helped to offset higher scrap iron and steel costs. We implemented initiatives targeting procurement and finished product pricing to offset the increased raw material costs. We began realizing the benefits of these procurement and pricing initiatives in the latter half of fiscal 2004.

      Net sales increased $2.7 million or 2.6% in fiscal 2004 as compared with the previous fiscal year. The increase was due to the higher price points of the new e² RAINBOW^TM vacuum cleaner system, which was launched earlier this year. The rollout of the new e² model was completed during the second quarter of fiscal 2004.

23

Table of Contents

      Operating income in fiscal 2004 increased $0.7 million or 2.6% when compared with fiscal 2003. Fiscal 2004 operating income was negatively impacted by $1.4 million in costs associated with the aforementioned launch of the new e² model. The year-over-year comparison was also impacted by an inventory reduction program implemented in fiscal 2003 that negatively impacted operating income by approximately $1.0 million that year.

      Corporate expenses increased $3.1 million in fiscal 2004 as compared to last year. The increase was attributable to reductions in pension income due to a lower discount rate, costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, an increase in consulting fees and an increase in personnel costs reflecting our new operating company organization. Fiscal 2004 also includes charges and amortization totaling $1.6 million associated with an employee stock option buy back and exchange offer. Corporate expenses in fiscal 2003 include $5.3 million of restructuring charges associated with the consolidation of our corporate offices, net of a favorable adjustment reversing previously established reserves for vacant leased space now occupied by the shared services center in Dallas, TX. Fiscal 2004 also includes a reversal of the restructuring reserve for unused leased space of $0.6 million associated with space that will be used by the customer service function that was relocated to the shared services operations center.

      The decrease in interest expense of $10.1 million from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2004 was due to lower debt balances and lower interest rates realized as a result of the July 2003 refinancing and the June 2004 bank amendment. The increase in interest income in fiscal 2004 was due to $2.5 million of interest received from the IRS related to a prior year audit settlement.

      Other expense, net was $2.9 million in fiscal 2004 compared to $26.5 million in fiscal 2003. Included in other expense, net for both years are expenses associated with retained liabilities of our ladder operations, which was sold in October 1999. Fiscal 2004 also includes foreign currency transaction losses and a loss for the decrease in the value of the Polyaire call option (see Note 3 of our Consolidated Financial Statements) offset by a gain of $3.2 million resulting from the resolution of litigation that was under appeal for several years. Fiscal 2003 includes $19.2 million of charges associated with the refinancing of our debt facilities in July 2003, a gain on the sale of real estate of $3.4 million and $2.3 million of other financing charges related to our debt facilities.

      During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, we had an initial meeting with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) to begin their audit for the fiscal years 1998 through 2002. The IRS is currently at the information gathering stage of the audit process and has not communicated any areas of concern or proposed adjustments. The IRS anticipates completing their audit in June 2005. In addition, several states and various other countries have examinations either in the planning stages or currently underway and one of our subsidiaries is also under audit by the IRS for 1997 and 1998, a period prior to our acquisition of that subsidiary.

      During fiscal 2003, the IRS completed its examination of the federal income tax returns for fiscal 1995 through 1997. As a result of the audit settlement, a tax benefit of $13.6 million was recorded in fiscal 2003.

      Overall, net sales increased $124.3 million or 11.6% in fiscal year 2003 when compared to fiscal 2002. The results reflect sales increases in each of our operating segments, with the most significant increases achieved in our Bath Products segment. Fiscal 2003 results include $8.6 million in sales recognized upon the

24

Table of Contents

      Net sales in our Bath Products segment increased by $102.0 million or 14.3% in fiscal 2003 as compared with fiscal 2002. Approximately $28.2 million of the increase or 27.6% was due to the firming of the British pound and the euro against the U.S. dollar. The remaining increase was primarily the result of increased sales of our bath products in the U.K. and our spas in the U.S. in addition to the introduction of our JACUZZI® whirlpool bath product lines into the nearly 900 Lowe’s home centers in the U.S. The increase in the sales for U.K. bath products was primarily attributable to additional sales to Focus and Homebase, two leading U.K. homecenter retailers. The increase in sales of our domestic spas was the result of strong sales and marketing efforts and an expanded specialty retail dealer base.

      Operating income of $7.4 million for fiscal 2003 includes $14.6 million of restructuring and other charges primarily related to the closure of two plants, while operating income of $26.7 million for fiscal 2002 includes $2.5 million of restructuring and other charges related to the elimination of an executive layer of management. A separate discussion of these charges can be found in Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Excluding these charges, operating income decreased as favorable sales volume was offset by labor inefficiencies and start up costs related to the move to a new whirlpool bath manufacturing facility in Chino, CA, costs of process improvements to enhance quality and future operating efficiencies at the new Chino, CA plant, costs related to the Lowe’s roll-out, higher insurance costs, increased marketing expenses and escalating costs associated with our cast iron and sanitary ware businesses. In addition, we established a $2.5 million reserve against a receivable from a Brazilian distributor in fiscal 2003 in accordance with SFAS No. 114, Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan — an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 5 and 15, as amended. Favorable currency exchange rates improved earnings by $5.0 million for fiscal 2003.

      Net sales in the Plumbing Products segment increased by $18.8 million or 7.3% for fiscal 2003 when compared with fiscal 2002. Fiscal 2003 includes $8.6 million from the sale of a license for technology that had been the subject of patent litigation. Without these revenues, sales still remained ahead of 2002 despite continued softness in the U.S. commercial and institutional construction markets, which declined by approximately 6% in fiscal 2003. This was accomplished by enhancing product offerings and implementing programs to increase market share.

      Operating income increased from $51.3 million in fiscal 2002 to $62.1 million in fiscal 2003. Fiscal 2002 results include restructuring and other charges of $1.3 million related to a management restructuring and discontinued product lines (see Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). The increase in operating income, after giving effect for the restructuring and other charges in fiscal 2002, is the result of higher sales and the $8.6 million sale of the technology license. Without the sale of the license, margins as a percentage of sales would have decreased slightly primarily as a result of changes in the product mix sold.

      Net sales increased by $3.5 million or 3.5% in fiscal 2003 as compared to fiscal 2002. The increase was the result of higher volume and a price increase implemented at the beginning of fiscal 2003.

25

Table of Contents

      Operating income decreased from $27.4 million in fiscal 2002 to $26.6 million in fiscal 2003. Increased margins from the increase in sales were offset by decreased overhead absorption of approximately $1.0 million related to an inventory reduction program and increased compensation costs in fiscal 2003 and a decrease in estimated warranty reserves during 2002 that increased operating income that year.

      Corporate expenses increased by $3.9 million in fiscal 2003 as compared with fiscal 2002. The increase is primarily attributable to net restructuring charges in fiscal 2003 of $5.3 million related to the consolidation of corporate offices and a favorable adjustment to prior year reserves related to a corporate lease obligation. Fiscal 2002 includes restructuring charges of $3.4 million related to the same corporate lease obligation (see Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements). We increased the reserve in fiscal 2002 when it became apparent that we could not sub-lease the empty space. A portion of the reserve was reversed when we decided to utilize the space for the shared services operations center. The remaining increase, after giving effect to the net restructuring charges, is primarily due to a decrease in pension income, reflecting a reduction in the discount rate used in valuing the plans. Partially offsetting these increased costs are decreases in compensation and other personnel related expenses due to staffing reductions as well as decreases in professional fees.

      The decrease in interest expense of $14.0 million from fiscal 2003 to fiscal 2002 was largely due to lower debt balances resulting from asset disposals, the proceeds of which were used for the repayment of debt.

      The decrease in interest income in fiscal 2003 was primarily due to the January 2002 sale of $156.9 million in aggregate principal amount of 12.5% Strategic Notes.

      Other expense, net was $26.5 million in fiscal 2003 compared to $15.5 million for fiscal 2002. Fiscal 2003 includes $19.2 million of charges associated with the refinancing of our debt facilities in July 2003, $3.7 million in expenses associated with retained liabilities of our ladder operations which were sold in October 1999 and $2.3 million of other financing charges related to our debt facilities. Fiscal 2002 includes $9.2 million in financing related charges and $5.2 million in expenses associated with our ladder operations.

      During fiscal 2003, the IRS completed its examination of the federal income tax returns for fiscal 1995 through 1997. As a result of the audit settlement, a tax benefit of $13.6 million was recorded in fiscal 2003. In fiscal 2002, we recorded a tax benefit of $29.6 million, which was largely attributable to benefits realized as the result of certain asset sales and changes in tax laws regarding the utilization of loss carry backs.

      We are able to carry back net operating losses in fiscal 2002 for which we had previously established a valuation allowance in fiscal 2001 as a result of a change in tax law under the Job Creation and Worker’s Assistance Act of 2002. In accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, the release of a valuation allowance due to a change in tax law is reflected through continuing operations. We had established the valuation allowance in fiscal 2001 to reflect the uncertainty of the future realization of losses recognized in connection with the 2001 Disposal Plan (see Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources are cash and cash equivalents, cash provided from operations and available borrowings. We expect to satisfy operating needs including the cash requirements

26

Table of Contents

      Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations was $46.4 million for fiscal 2004, compared to $79.9 million for fiscal 2003. The difference between 2004 and 2003 was primarily because fiscal 2003 activity included a $46.7 million receipt of income tax refunds, net of tax payments, and $8.6 million resulting from a technology sale, offset by payments of liabilities we had previously accrued related to retained liabilities for operations we had sold during that year. We typically use cash in the first half of the fiscal year due to the seasonality of most of our businesses. Weather can significantly impact construction and installation, which ultimately impacts sales in our Bath Products and Plumbing Products segments. Sales of outdoor jetted spas and other products are also sensitive to weather conditions and tend to decrease during the fall and winter months (predominantly the first and second fiscal quarters).

      Inventories at fiscal year end 2004 increased by $27.5 million, or 16.7%, over fiscal 2003. Inventory levels have increased in all three of our business segments. The increase in our Bath Products segment was due to sales growth in fiscal 2004 and the transition to sourced inventory products as a result of closing the Salem, OH plant and downsizing the Ford City, PA facility. Inventory levels increased year-over-year in our Plumbing Products segment primarily as a result of business growth and an increase in materials cost. Inventory levels were up in our Rexair segment as compared to fiscal 2003 due to the higher costs of parts for the new e² RAINBOW^TM vacuum cleaner system. In addition, Rexair inventory levels were lower at the end of fiscal 2003 in anticipation of the launch of the new e² model.

      Trade accounts receivable, net increased $18.1 million in fiscal 2004 compared to the prior year. The increase was mainly due to sales growth, as days of sales outstanding remained relatively flat year-over-year.

      During fiscal 2004, we paid approximately $13.4 million related to our restructuring plans, and expect to pay approximately $16.3 million in the next 12 months (see Note 4 to our Consolidated Financial Statements) including $6.6 million of charges to be incurred during fiscal 2005. During fiscal 2003, we paid approximately $5.3 million related to our restructuring plans.

      Net cash used by discontinued operations in fiscal 2004 was $1.8 million as compared to net cash used of $5.0 million in fiscal 2003. The net cash used in fiscal 2004 pertained to the operations of our water systems business, which was sold in October 2003. In addition, the swimming pool and equipment business was sold in May 2003, before its cash-generating season.

      Net cash used by investing activities of $12.5 million in fiscal 2004 included $4.5 million received from sold businesses of which approximately $2.4 million related to the sale of our water systems business in October 2003, and $2.1 million related to payments received in connection with the sale of our swimming pool and equipment business in May 2003. We also received $2.4 million from collection of a portion of a note we held from the owners of a power plant constructed by one of our former subsidiaries, as well as $3.9 million from the sale of excess real estate and fixed assets. These receipts were offset by $23.3 million paid for capital expenditures. Net cash provided by investing activities of $112.6 million for fiscal 2003 consisted of net proceeds of $120.5 million from the sale of SiTeco and our swimming pool and equipment business and $11.1 million from the sale of excess real estate, partially offset by $19.2 million of capital expenditures.

      We expect total capital expenditures for fiscal 2005 to be approximately $28.0 million for new business requirements, system upgrades and implementations, initiatives involving the consolidation of workflows and improvement of manufacturing efficiencies and other capital requirements in the ordinary course of business.

      Net cash used in financing activities was $30.9 million during fiscal 2004. We repaid $30.3 million of our debt, including a $3.2 million permanent reduction of our term loan. We also paid $1.5 million of financing fees related to our bank facilities and senior notes.

      Net cash used in financing activities was $197.9 million for fiscal 2003, which consists of net repayments of long-term debt and notes payable of $310.1 million, deposits of $66.5 million into restricted cash collateral accounts, payments of debt issuance and other financing costs of $45.6 million, offset by

27

Table of Contents

      On July 15, 2003, we completed a comprehensive re-financing of our corporate debt by closing on the issuance of $380.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 9.625% senior secured notes (the “Senior Notes”), as well as a new five-year $200.0 million asset-based revolving credit facility and a five-year $65.0 million term loan (collectively the “Bank Facilities”). The net proceeds from the Senior Notes together with the initial borrowings under the Bank Facilities were used to repay debt and redeem the senior notes that were outstanding at that time.

      On June 30, 2004, we amended our Bank Facilities, and on July 2, 2004, we made a $3.2 million payment to the bank permanently reducing our term loan to $61.8 million. The amendment provides for:

	•	a reduction in the interest rate of our term loan from Prime plus 5.0%, with a minimum rate of 9.25%, to LIBOR plus 5.0%, with no minimum rate;
	•	the elimination of annual prepayments on the term loan of $10.0 million, which were scheduled to begin in August 2005;
	•	the elimination of annual prepayments on the term loan equal to 25% of our annual consolidated excess cash flow, as determined by the original loan agreement;
	•	the extension of the term loan’s maturity date by one year to July 15, 2009; and
	•	the elimination of all debt covenants except the requirement to maintain a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio. This requirement is applicable only if our availability under the asset-based credit facility falls below $20.0 million.

      This amendment was not considered a substantial modification of our debt under the guidance provided in EITF Issue No. 96-19, Debtor’s Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments.

      The outstanding debt balances and the maximum availability under these debt instruments at October 2, 2004 were as follows:

(1)	In addition, $42.1 million of the facility is utilized for letters of credit at the end of fiscal 2004.

      The net cash proceeds from the Senior Notes were approximately $367.4 million after transaction fees. Transaction fees were capitalized and are being amortized over the seven-year term of the Senior Notes. The Senior Notes, which are due July 1, 2010 and require the payment of interest of $18.3 million on January 1 and July 1 of each year, were subject to registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a registration rights agreement. On February 17, 2004, we completed an offer to exchange new, registered Senior Notes for the then outstanding unregistered notes. The terms of the new, registered Senior Notes are identical, in all material respects, to the terms of the then outstanding unregistered notes, except that the new Senior Notes have been registered under the Securities Act, and the transfer restrictions and registration rights relating to the unregistered notes do not apply to the registered Senior Notes.

28

Table of Contents

      We are restricted in the redemption of the Senior Notes per the terms of the agreement with the note holders (the “Agreement”). Prior to July 1, 2006, we can redeem up to 35% of the Senior Notes with the net cash proceeds of an equity offering, as defined in the Agreement. On and after July 1, 2007, we can redeem the Senior Notes subject to a redemption premium of 104.8% for the first 12 months and 102.4% for the following 12 months. On and after July 1, 2009, the Senior Notes can be redeemed at face value.

      The five-year asset-based revolving credit facility matures on July 15, 2008. Under this facility, we can borrow up to $200.0 million subject to a borrowing base consisting of eligible accounts receivable and eligible inventory, plus eligible trademarks. The initial amount of eligible trademarks of $20.0 million is being amortized monthly over the first two years of the facility as a reduction of the borrowing base. The weighted average interest rate on borrowings under the asset-based credit facility was 3.98% for fiscal 2004. There are several fees associated with the asset-based credit facility including an unused commitment fee of 0.5%, a letter of credit fee equal to the applicable LIBOR margin and a fronting fee of 0.125% on all outstanding letters of credit.

      The Bank Facilities contain a subjective acceleration clause and a requirement to maintain a lockbox associated with our asset-based facility. As required by EITF Issue No. 95-22, Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements that Include both a Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lockbox Arrangement, the entire balance of the asset-based facility is included in current maturities of long-term debt.

      We incurred approximately $8.7 million in transaction and professional fees associated with the completion of the Bank Facilities deal in fiscal 2003. These costs were capitalized, and a portion is being amortized over the five-year term of the asset-based credit facility, and a portion is being amortized over the six-year term of the term loan. The Bank Facilities require us to maintain a minimum consolidated fixed charge coverage ratio, which is only applicable if our availability under the asset-based credit facility falls below $20.0 million. We were not subject to this debt covenant at October 2, 2004 because our availability exceeded the required threshold. We expect to maintain availability in excess of $20.0 million for the foreseeable future. Our Bank Facilities also include a restriction on the payment of dividends.

      Certain of our existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries guarantee the Senior Notes, jointly and severally, on a senior basis. The Senior Notes are secured by an eligible first lien on domestic property, plant and equipment, and a second lien on the assets that secure the Bank Facilities. The asset-based credit facility is secured by a first lien on accounts receivable, inventory, intangibles, the stock of our domestic subsidiaries and 65% of the stock of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries. In addition, the asset-based credit facility has a second lien on the property, plant and equipment securing the Senior Notes. The term loan is secured by the same assets that secure the asset-based credit facility, but the term loan will be paid on a “last out” basis following the payment of the obligations under the asset-based credit facility.

      The continued decrease in total debt combined with increased earnings continues to move us closer towards our goal of achieving investment grade ratios. The reduction in leverage along with investment grade ratios will support the objective of improved borrowing rates leading to lower interest costs over time. On November 1, 2004, the interest rate on our asset-based revolving credit facility was lowered from LIBOR plus 2.25% to LIBOR plus 2.0% as a result of a decrease in our leverage ratio.

      At October 2, 2004, we had approximately $145.7 million available to be borrowed under the asset-based facility, of which we had utilized approximately $44.6 million (including $42.1 million of letters of credit), leaving $101.1 million available for additional borrowings. In addition, we have outstanding foreign commercial letters of credit of $1.8 million, which do not affect availability under the asset-based facility. We do not have any other significant off-balance sheet obligations.

29

Table of Contents

      Below is a summary of our significant contractual cash obligations as of October 2, 2004:

(1)	Purchase obligations are all open purchase orders at October 2, 2004. Of this amount, $8.3 million represents obligations that were relieved by October 6, 2004.
(2)	Marketing commitment represents a company-wide marketing campaign for the Bath Products segment. Of this amount, $0.6 million is legally binding at October 2, 2004.
(3)	Interest payments represent interest on the Senior Notes, term loan and asset-based revolving credit facility.
(4)	Other includes obligations relating to restructuring initiatives and indemnifications for assets and previously sold businesses.

      We continue to guarantee the lease payments of an Ames True Temper master distribution center. The lease obligation will expire in 2015. The scheduled lease payments totaled $3.7 million for fiscal 2004, and increase by 2.25% each year thereafter. In connection with the sale of Ames True Temper in January 2002, we obtained a security interest and indemnification from Ames True Temper on the lease that would enable us to exercise remedies in the event of default.

      We have an agreement with a third party financing company that we will repurchase any new or salable spas returned to us within twelve months of the original sale date. The costs associated with this agreement have been minimal to date.

      We have sold a number of assets and businesses over the last several years and have, on occasion, provided indemnifications for liabilities relating to product liability, environmental, insurance and other claims. We have recorded reserves totaling approximately $20.6 million as of October 2, 2004 for asserted and potential unasserted claims related to these liabilities. These amounts have not been discounted.

New Accounting Pronouncement

      In November 2004, FASB Statement No. 151, Inventory Costs, an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4 (“SFAS No. 151”), was issued. The amendments made by SFAS No. 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and require the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 will become effective for us beginning in fiscal 2006. We are in the process of assessing the impact SFAS No. 151 will have on our financial position and results of operations.

30

Table of Contents

Foreign Currency Matters

      The functional currency of each of our foreign operations is the local currency. Assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet dates, while net sales, expenses and cash flows are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Translation gains and losses are reported as a component of stockholders’ equity.

Effects of Inflation

      Because of the relatively low level of inflation experienced in most of our principal markets, inflation did not have a material impact on our results of operations during the periods presented. Although higher than normal inflation in fiscal 2004 resulted in increased scrap iron and steel costs used in the production of certain of our products, we were able to offset those increases with more favorable pricing of those products.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

      Management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We regularly review our estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions, which are based upon historical experience and on various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Reported amounts and disclosures may have been different had management used different estimates and assumptions or if different conditions had occurred in the periods presented. Our accounting policies can be found in Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. Below is a discussion of the policies that we believe may involve a high degree of judgment and complexity.

      We record an allowance for doubtful accounts, reducing our receivables balance to an amount we estimate is collectible from our customers. We use significant judgment in estimating uncollectible amounts, considering numerous factors such as current overall economic conditions, industry specific economic conditions, historical and current customer performance and customer relationships. Although we consider our allowances for uncollectible accounts to be adequate and proper, changes in economic conditions or customer circumstances could have a material effect on the reserve balances required. Historically, actual results have not deviated significantly from those previously estimated by management.

      Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. We review our inventory balances to determine if inventories can be sold at amounts equal to or greater than their recorded values. The review includes the identification of slow-moving inventories, obsolete inventories and discontinued products based on the historical performance of the inventories and current operational plans for inventories, as well as estimated future customer demand for the inventories. Historically, actual results have not deviated significantly from those previously estimated by management.

      Deferred tax assets and liabilities represent the tax effects, based on current law, of any temporary differences in the timing of when net sales and expenses are recognized for tax purposes and when they are recognized for financial statement purposes. Management reviews the deferred tax assets periodically for recoverability, and valuation allowances are provided as necessary. We consider expected future income and gains from investments as well as tax planning strategies, including the potential sale of certain assets, in

31

Table of Contents

      Significant judgment is required in determining our effective tax rate and in evaluation of our tax provisions. Despite our belief that our tax return positions are fully supportable, we estimate tax exposures and establish accruals when in our judgment we believe that certain positions are likely to be challenged and that we may not succeed. We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit.

      We record reserves for the difference between the carrying value and the net realizable value of our net assets held for sale. These reserves require that management make assumptions about estimated proceeds, based on the demand for these assets and current market conditions, and about estimated costs to sell, based on management’s professional knowledge and experience. We monitor these reserves on an on-going basis and record adjustments to our estimates based on actual results and management’s updated knowledge. Assets held for sale have been evaluated for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets (“SFAS No. 144”).

      We have significant intangible assets related to goodwill and other acquired intangibles. The determination of related estimated useful lives and whether or not these assets are impaired involves significant judgment. Changes in strategy, reporting unit operating results and/or market conditions could significantly impact our judgment and could require adjustments to recorded asset balances. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets (“SFAS No. 142”), we test our goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment at the reporting unit level annually in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, or earlier in the year if indications of impairment arise. We test our finite-lived intangible assets for impairment when there are indicators of impairment as defined in SFAS No. 142. The results of any of these tests could require adjustments to recorded asset balances in future periods.

      In establishing accruals for restructuring costs associated with exit or disposal activities, we measure our liability at fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred in accordance with SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. In estimating the fair value of expected exit and disposal costs, we make certain assumptions to determine the remaining lease obligations, sublease income, severance costs, relocation costs and other exit costs. While we feel our assumptions are appropriate, there can be no assurance that actual costs will not differ from estimates used to establish the restructuring reserves. If actual results differ from our estimates, we may need to adjust, upward or downward, our restructuring reserves in the future. Additionally, long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, which involves the use of estimates to calculate fair value, future cash flows and costs to sell. These estimates may differ from actual amounts realized in future periods.

      We are subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to environmental, labor, product and other matters. We are required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. We determine the amount of reserves needed, if any, for each individual issue based on our professional knowledge and experience and discussions with legal counsel. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter, the ultimate resolution of each matter or changes in approach, such as a change in settlement strategy, in dealing with these matters.

      We have sold a number of assets and businesses over the last several years and have, on occasion, provided indemnification for liabilities relating to product liability, environmental and other claims. We have recorded reserves for claims related to these obligations when appropriate and, on certain occasions, have

32

Table of Contents

      Our insurance programs for workers’ compensation, general liability, vehicle liability and employee-related health care benefits are effectively self-insured. We record self-insurance accruals based on our estimates of the fully developed cost of claims filed and claims incurred but not reported. Estimates of claims development and claims incurred but not reported are developed by us with the help of an independent actuary. If actual experience of claims development is significantly different than our estimates, an adjustment to our self-insurance accruals may need to be recorded in future periods.

      Reserves are recorded on our consolidated balance sheets to reflect our contractual liabilities relating to warranty commitments to our customers. We provide warranty coverage of various lengths and terms to our customers depending on standard offerings and negotiated contractual agreements. We record an estimate for warranty expense at the time of sale based on historical warranty return rates and repair costs. Should future warranty experience differ materially from our historical experience, we may be required to record additional warranty reserves which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which these additional reserves are required.

      We have significant pension and post-retirement benefit income and expense and assets/liabilities that are developed from actuarial valuations. These valuations include key assumptions regarding discount rates, expected return on plan assets, mortality rates, merit and promotion increases and the current health care cost trend rate. We consider current market conditions in selecting these assumptions. Changes in the related pension and post-retirement benefit income/costs or assets/liabilities may occur in the future due to changes in the assumptions and changes in asset values.

      When valuing the pension plans at the end of fiscal 2004, we reduced our discount rate by 25 basis points for our domestic plan and increased the life expectancy assumptions on our UK plan. Also influencing the expected expense of approximately $3.2 million in fiscal 2005 in comparison to the pension income of $3.2 million in fiscal 2004 are increases in the amortization of prior year losses. Future changes in the assumptions underlying our pension valuations, including those that arise as a result of continued declines in equity markets and interest rates, could result in further reductions in pension income, which could negatively affect our consolidated results of operations in future periods.

      We recognized $3.2 million, $6.7 million and $11.8 million of pension income in fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These amounts increased our operating income by an equal amount for each of the respective periods. Pension income, excluding service costs, related to our Master Plan is included as a reduction to corporate expenses. Our Master Plan covers certain employees in each of our three segments and our corporate office, as well as certain employees in some of our legacy companies. The service cost portion of pension income associated with our Master Plan is allocated to the operating segments and corporate based on employee data. Pension income or expense associated with our other post-employment benefit plans are recorded on the books of the business that employs the benefited employees and are not shared between operating segments.

      We accrue an estimated liability for each environmental matter when the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of loss associated with such unfavorable outcome is reasonably estimable. We presume that a matter is probable of an unfavorable outcome if (a) litigation has commenced or a claim has been asserted or if commencement of litigation or assertion of a claim is probable and (b) if we are somehow associated with the site. In addition, if the reporting entity has been named as a Potentially Responsible Party (“PRP”), an unfavorable outcome is presumed.

33

Table of Contents

      Estimating environmental remediation liabilities involves an array of issues at any point in time. In the early stages of the process, cost estimates can be difficult to derive because of uncertainties about a variety of factors. For this reason, estimates developed in the early stages of remediation can vary significantly; and, in many cases, early estimates later require significant revision. The following are some of the factors that are integral to developing cost estimates:

	•	The extent and types of hazardous substances at a site;
	•	The range of technologies that can be used for remediation;
	•	Evolving standards of what constitutes acceptable remediation; and
	•	The number and financial condition of other PRPs and the extent of their responsibility for the remediation.

      An estimate of the range of an environmental remediation liability typically is derived by combining estimates of various components of the liability, which themselves are likely to be ranges. At the early stages of the remediation process, particular components of the overall liability may not be reasonably estimable. This fact does not preclude our recognition of a liability. Rather, the components of the liability that can be reasonably estimated are viewed as a surrogate for the minimum in the range of our overall liability. Estimated legal and consulting fees are included as a component of our overall liability.

      Certain environmental contamination treatment costs are capitalized in accordance with EITF Issue No. 90-8, Capitalization of Costs to Treat Environmental Contamination, while most of them are charged to expense when they are incurred. If the costs are recoverable, they are capitalized only if one of following criteria is met:

	•	The costs extend the life, increase the capacity or improve the safety or efficiency of property owned. The condition of that property after the costs are incurred must be improved as compared with the condition of that property when originally constructed or acquired.
	•	The costs mitigate or prevent environmental contamination that has yet to occur and that otherwise may result from future operations or activities. In addition, the costs improve the property compared with its condition when constructed or acquired.
	•	The costs are incurred in preparing for sale that property which is currently held for sale.

      As noted in Item 3 Legal Proceedings of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Zurn records a liability for pending and potential future asbestos claims, as well as a receivable for insurance coverage of such liability. The valuation of Zurn’s potential asbestos liability, which was performed this year by an independent economic consulting firm with substantial experience in asbestos liability valuations, was based on the number and severity of future asbestos claims, future settlement costs, and the effectiveness of Zurn’s defense strategies and settlement initiatives.

      Zurn’s present estimate of its asbestos liability assumes (i) its continuous vigorous defense strategy will remain effective; (ii) new asbestos claims filed annually against it will decline modestly through 2014; (iii) the values by disease will remain consistent with past experience and (iv) its insurers will continue to pay defense costs without eroding the coverage amounts of its insurance policies. Zurn’s potential asbestos liability could be adversely affected by changes in law and other factors beyond its control. Further, while Zurn’s current asbestos liability is based on an estimate of claims through 2014, such liability may continue beyond 2014, and such liability could be substantial.

      Zurn estimates that its available insurance to cover its potential asbestos liability as of the end of fiscal 2004 is greater than its potential asbestos liability. This conclusion was reached after considering Zurn’s experience in asbestos litigation, the insurance payments made to date by Zurn’s insurance carriers, existing insurance policies, the industry ratings of the insurers and the advice of insurance coverage counsel with respect to applicable insurance coverage law relating to the terms and conditions of those policies. Zurn used

34

Table of Contents

      We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria are met: persuasive evidence of the arrangement exists; delivery has occurred and we have no remaining obligations; prices are fixed or determinable; and collectibility is probable. We make shipments to approved customers based on orders placed. Prices are fixed when the customer places the order. An approved customer is one that has been subjected to our credit evaluation. We record revenue when title passes, which is either at the time of shipment or upon delivery to the customer. The passage of title is dependent on the arrangements made with each customer. Provisions are made for sales returns and allowances at the time of sale.

      We use significant judgment in estimating sales return costs, considering numerous factors such as current overall and industry-specific economic conditions and historical sales return rates. Although we consider our sales return reserves to be adequate and proper, changes in historical customer patterns could require adjustments to the reserves. Historically, however, actual results have not deviated significantly from those previously estimated by management. We also record reductions to our revenues for customer and distributor programs and incentive offerings including special pricing agreements, promotions and other volume-based incentives. We may take actions to increase customer incentive offerings possibly resulting in an incremental reduction of revenue at the time the incentive is offered.

      FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS No. 123”), defines a fair value method of accounting for issuance of stock options and other equity instruments. Under the fair value method, compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. Pursuant to SFAS No. 123, we are not required to adopt the fair value method of accounting for employee stock-based transactions at this time. We are permitted to account for such transactions under APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which defines an intrinsic value method of accounting for the issuance of stock options and other equity instruments, but are required to disclose in a note to our consolidated financial statements pro forma net income and per share amounts as if we had applied the methods prescribed by SFAS No. 123. For purposes of the pro forma disclosure, we calculate the fair value of our stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. To use this model, we must judgmentally determine the estimated life of the stock option, the projected volatility of our company stock over the estimated life of the stock option, the projected dividend yield of our company stock over the estimated life of the stock option and the risk-free interest rate. For further information regarding our stock option plans, see Note 8 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

      Effective October 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS, No. 144, which establishes a single accounting model for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, including discontinued operations. SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121, Accounting for the Impairment of Long-lived Assets and for Long-lived Assets to be Disposed Of, and APB Opinion No. 30, Reporting the Results of Operations — Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions (“APB No. 30”). Our 2001 Disposal Plan was accounted for in accordance with APB No. 30, while our 2003 Disposal Plan was accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 144. Both of these accounting standards contain criteria that must be met in order for businesses to be presented as discontinued operations.

      In connection with our accounting for each of these Disposal Plans, we segregated the assets, liabilities and operations of the discontinued businesses. The operations are presented as discontinued operations in our consolidated statements of operations. The assets and liabilities of these businesses are included in assets held for sale and liabilities associated with assets held for sale in the balance sheets. In fiscal 2001, we accrued for

35

Table of Contents

      Any potential variable interest entity (“VIE”) created after January 31, 2003 in which we hold a variable interest must be assessed to determine whether the VIE should be consolidated into our results based on criteria established by FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51 (“FIN 46”). Management’s judgment, and in many cases, probability-weighted projected cash flows are used in determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity and whether we are the primary beneficiary. We have completed an evaluation of our variable interests and believe that we do not have any interests in any VIEs. However, even after exhaustive efforts, we have been unable to obtain information from Woodlands Ventures, LLC, a property developer from whom we obtained a $9.3 million note receivable upon the sale of a piece of property in October 2002, that would allow us to assess whether the entity is a VIE. We will continue to make exhaustive efforts to obtain the information necessary to complete our evaluation.

Disclosure Concerning Forward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results

      In December 1995, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”) was enacted by the U.S. Congress. The Act, as amended, contains certain amendments to the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These amendments provide protection from liability in private lawsuits for “forward-looking” statements made by public companies. We take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Act.

      Our Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Letter of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer included in our Annual Report to Stockholders contains both historical information and other information that may be used to infer future performance. Examples of historical information include our annual financial statements and the commentary on past performance contained in the MD&A. While we have specifically identified certain information as being forward-looking in the context of its presentation, we caution the reader that, with the exception of information that is clearly historical, all the information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the letter of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer included in the Report to Stockholders should be considered to be “forward-looking statements” as referred to in the Act. Without limitation, when we use the words “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “continue,” “project,” “probably,” “should,” and similar expressions, we intend to clearly express that the information deals with possible future events and is forward-looking in nature.

      The following are some of the factors we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results:

	•	We have substantial indebtedness and servicing our indebtedness could reduce funds available to operate our business.
	•	Our debt instruments contain covenants which will limit our ability to operate our business.
	•	To service our indebtedness, we will require a significant amount of cash. Our ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our control.
	•	The seasonality of our sales and economic events may adversely affect our financial results and our ability to service our debt.
	•	Weather could adversely affect the demand for our products and decrease our net sales.
	•	Demand for building and home improvement products may depend on availability of financing.

36

Table of Contents

	•	We may be adversely affected by downturns in the markets we serve.
	•	The markets in which we sell our products are highly competitive.
	•	The loss of any significant customer could adversely affect our business.
	•	An increase in the price of raw materials, components, finished goods and other commodities could adversely affect our operations.
	•	We are exposed to political, economic and other risks that arise from operating a multinational business.
	•	We are subject to currency exchange rate and other related risks.
	•	We are subject to numerous asbestos claims that could adversely affect us.
	•	We are subject to environmental regulation and incur costs relating to environmental matters.
	•	We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights.
	•	Our failure to attract and retain qualified resources could have an adverse effect on us.
	•	Work stoppages and other labor problems could affect us.

      Other factors besides those listed here could also adversely affect results. For more information regarding these forward-looking statements and factors that may affect future results, refer to the Risk Factors section in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

      In the normal course of doing business, we are exposed to the risks associated with changes in interest rates and currency exchange rates. To limit the risks from such fluctuations, we may enter into various hedging transactions that have been authorized pursuant to our policies, but we do not engage in such transactions for trading purposes.

      To manage exposure to interest rate movements, we have used interest rate protection agreements. However, as of October 2, 2004, we do not have any such agreements outstanding. Based on our overall exposure to interest rate changes, a hypothetical increase of 100 basis points across all maturities of our floating rate debt obligations would decrease our estimated pre-tax earnings in fiscal 2005 by $0.7 million, compared to a $3.8 million decrease in fiscal 2004 pre-tax earnings had LIBOR rates been 100 basis points higher. Net payments under swap agreements amounted to approximately $3.4 million for fiscal 2002. There were no swap agreements outstanding during any portion of fiscal 2003 or fiscal 2004. The fiscal 2002 swaps were of notional amounts and maturities that related to specific portions of outstanding debt, and accordingly, were accounted for as hedge transactions.

      We are also exposed to foreign currency exchange risk related to our international operations as well as our U.S. businesses, which import or export goods. We have made limited use of financial instruments to manage this risk and have no such instruments outstanding as of September 2004. Hypothetical unfavorable movements of 10% across each of the foreign exchange rates from which we have exposure would have decreased our estimated income from continuing operations by approximately $3.9 million, before taxes, in fiscal 2004 and $3.6 million, before taxes, in fiscal 2003. This calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the U.S. dollar. In addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates, which are a changed dollar value of the resulting sales, changes in exchange rates also affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors’ products become more or less attractive. Our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency prices. See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our derivative and hedging activities.

37

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of

      We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc. (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows, and changes in stockholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2004. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Jacuzzi Brands, Inc. at September 30, 2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

	/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
	Certified Public Accountants

West Palm Beach, Florida

38

Table of Contents

JACUZZI BRANDS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS