UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2004
Commission File No: 000-31225
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
Tennessee | 62-1812853 | |
(State or jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
The Commerce Center, 211 Commerce Street, Suite 300, Nashville, Tennessee 37201
(615) 744-3700
Not Applicable
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act.)
Yes [ ] No [X]
As of July 31, 2004, there were 7,404,586 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, issued and outstanding.
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc.
Report on Form 10-Q
June 30, 2004
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No. |
||||||||
PART I: |
||||||||
Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
3 | |||||||
17 | ||||||||
37 | ||||||||
37 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
38 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
39 | ||||||||
40 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO | ||||||||
EX-31.2 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO | ||||||||
EX-32.1 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CEO | ||||||||
EX-32.2 SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF THE CFO |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) may from time to time make written or oral statements, including statements contained in this report which may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). The words expect, anticipate, intend, consider, plan, believe, seek, should, estimate, and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements, but other statements may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements should be considered subject to various risks and uncertainties. Such forward-looking statements are made based upon managements belief as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management pursuant to safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Pinnacle Financials actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors. Such factors are described below and include, without limitation, (i) unanticipated deterioration in the financial condition of borrowers resulting in significant increases in loan losses and provisions for those losses, (ii) increased competition with other financial institutions, (iii) lack of sustained growth in the economy in the Nashville, Tennessee area, (iv) rapid fluctuations or unanticipated changes in interest rates, (v) the inability of our bank subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank (Pinnacle National) to satisfy regulatory requirements for its expansion plans, (vi) changes in the legislative and regulatory environment and (vii) the inability of Pinnacle Financial to successfully complete its recently announced public offering of common stock. Many of such factors are beyond Pinnacle Financials ability to control or predict, and readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Pinnacle Financial does not intend to update or reissue any forward-looking statements contained in this report as a result of new information or other circumstances that may become known to Pinnacle Financial.
Page 2
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and noninterest-bearing due from banks |
$ | 21,147,438 | $ | 13,768,278 | ||||
Interest-bearing due from banks |
747,081 | 1,180,371 | ||||||
Federal funds sold |
24,613,281 | 32,235,401 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
46,507,800 | 47,184,050 | ||||||
Securities available-for-sale, at fair value |
137,892,209 | 139,944,238 | ||||||
Securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $26,326,316) |
27,636,017 | | ||||||
Mortgage loans held-for-sale |
3,853,818 | 1,582,600 | ||||||
Loans |
355,267,007 | 297,004,110 | ||||||
Less allowance for loan losses |
(4,465,615 | ) | (3,718,598 | ) | ||||
Loans, net |
350,801,392 | 293,285,512 | ||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
7,593,716 | 6,911,359 | ||||||
Other assets |
12,028,192 | 9,512,899 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 586,313,144 | $ | 498,420,658 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand |
$ | 82,491,061 | $ | 60,796,396 | ||||
Interest-bearing demand |
35,845,391 | 31,407,213 | ||||||
Savings and money market accounts |
162,334,853 | 140,383,878 | ||||||
Time |
186,649,747 | 157,981,525 | ||||||
Total deposits |
467,321,052 | 390,569,012 | ||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
23,772,482 | 15,050,110 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
47,500,000 | 44,500,000 | ||||||
Subordinated debt |
10,310,000 | 10,310,000 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
2,284,513 | 3,655,155 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
551,188,047 | 464,084,277 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, no par value; 10,000,000 shares
authorized; no shares issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, par value $1.00; 20,000,000
shares authorized; 7,404,586 issued
and outstanding at June 30, 2004 and
7,384,106 issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2003 |
7,404,586 | 7,384,106 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
27,071,090 | 26,990,894 | ||||||
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit) |
2,050,342 | (189,155 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net |
(1,400,921 | ) | 150,536 | |||||
Total stockholders equity |
35,125,097 | 34,336,381 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 586,313,144 | $ | 498,420,658 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 3
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Loans, including fees |
$ | 4,505,938 | $ | 3,356,843 | $ | 8,452,510 | $ | 6,320,353 | ||||||||
Securities, available-for-sale |
||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
1,555,145 | 930,427 | 3,106,004 | 1,833,697 | ||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
99,010 | 42,523 | 184,985 | 85,162 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold and other |
65,364 | 39,690 | 148,081 | 76,101 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
6,225,457 | 4,369,483 | 11,891,580 | 8,315,313 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
1,328,050 | 1,119,586 | 2,499,238 | 2,192,258 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
11,380 | 12,170 | 20,673 | 26,966 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings |
350,212 | 253,060 | 683,562 | 475,189 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
1,689,642 | 1,384,816 | 3,203,473 | 2,694,413 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
4,535,815 | 2,984,667 | 8,688,107 | 5,620,900 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
448,474 | 347,266 | 802,322 | 635,292 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
4,087,341 | 2,637,401 | 7,885,785 | 4,985,608 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
231,208 | 120,360 | 395,053 | 222,113 | ||||||||||||
Investment services |
404,516 | 176,292 | 794,095 | 332,224 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage lending income |
265,902 | 197,906 | 457,822 | 244,093 | ||||||||||||
Gain on loan participations sold |
116,461 | 124,039 | 238,078 | 126,229 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of investment securities, net |
| 116,573 | 248,353 | 134,270 | ||||||||||||
Other noninterest income |
164,796 | 141,879 | 274,838 | 280,304 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
1,182,883 | 877,049 | 2,408,239 | 1,339,233 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
2,319,763 | 1,693,685 | 4,587,105 | 3,128,597 | ||||||||||||
Equipment and occupancy |
535,053 | 445,961 | 1,040,743 | 842,786 | ||||||||||||
Marketing and other business development |
155,791 | 103,775 | 304,949 | 179,264 | ||||||||||||
Administrative |
315,709 | 183,692 | 536,407 | 321,913 | ||||||||||||
Postage and supplies |
124,125 | 106,229 | 223,264 | 179,491 | ||||||||||||
Other noninterest expense |
163,418 | 141,685 | 334,177 | 265,242 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
3,613,859 | 2,675,027 | 7,026,645 | 4,917,293 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
1,656,365 | 839,423 | 3,267,379 | 1,407,548 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
487,890 | 302,556 | 1,027,882 | 497,702 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,168,475 | $ | 536,867 | $ | 2,239,497 | $ | 909,846 | ||||||||
Per share information: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic net income per common share |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per common share |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
7,397,920 | 7,384,106 | 7,391,013 | 7,384,106 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
8,279,114 | 7,761,284 | 8,246,422 | 7,722,274 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 4
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
For the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003
Retained | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Earnings | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
Paid-in | (Accumulated | Comprehensive | Stockholders | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares |
Amount |
Capital |
Deficit) |
Income (Loss) |
Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2002 |
7,384,106 | $ | 7,384,106 | $ | 26,990,894 | $ | (2,743,794 | ) | $ | 772,441 | $ | 32,403,647 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 909,846 | | 909,846 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized holding gains on
available-for-sale securities,
net of deferred tax expense of
$(665,789) |
| | | | 313,847 | 313,847 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
1,223,693 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances, June 30, 2003 |
7,384,106 | $ | 7,384,106 | $ | 26,990,894 | $ | (1,833,948 | ) | $ | 1,086,288 | $ | 33,627,340 | ||||||||||||
Balances, December 31, 2003 |
7,384,106 | $ | 7,384,106 | $ | 26,990,894 | $ | (189,155 | ) | $ | 150,536 | $ | 34,336,381 | ||||||||||||
Exercise of employee incentive common
stock options |
20,480 | 20,480 | 80,196 | | | 100,676 | ||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 2,239,497 | | 2,239,497 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized holding losses on
available-for-sale securities, net
of deferred tax benefit of
$858,628 |
| | | | (1,551,457 | ) | (1,551,457 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
688,040 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balances, June 30, 2004 |
7,404,586 | $ | 7,404,586 | $ | 27,071,090 | $ | 2,050,342 | $ | (1,400,921 | ) | $ | 35,125,097 | ||||||||||||
Page 5
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Six months ended | ||||||||
June 30, |
||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,239,497 | $ | 909,846 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
used in operating activities: |
||||||||
Net amortization of available-for-sale securities |
539,066 | 362,468 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
544,310 | 430,522 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
802,322 | 635,292 | ||||||
Gain on sale of investment securities, net |
(248,353 | ) | (134,270 | ) | ||||
Gain on participations sold |
(238,078 | ) | (126,229 | ) | ||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit) |
(433,932 | ) | 497,702 | |||||
Mortgage loans held-for-sale: |
||||||||
Loans originated |
(26,905,608 | ) | (13,636,910 | ) | ||||
Loans sold |
24,634,390 | 11,325,210 | ||||||
Increase in other assets |
(303,556 | ) | (123,512 | ) | ||||
Decrease in other liabilities |
(1,370,642 | ) | (1,099,446 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(740,584 | ) | (959,327 | ) | ||||
Investing activities: |
||||||||
Activities in securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||
Purchases |
(69,273,714 | ) | (70,040,180 | ) | ||||
Sales |
21,876,953 | 18,945,243 | ||||||
Maturities, prepayments and calls |
19,019,714 | 25,384,782 | ||||||
(28,377,047 | ) | (25,710,155 | ) | |||||
Net increase in loans |
(58,318,202 | ) | (45,828,598 | ) | ||||
Purchases of premises and equipment and software |
(1,105,555 | ) | (2,334,810 | ) | ||||
Purchases of other assets |
(709,950 | ) | (743,400 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(88,510,754 | ) | (74,616,963 | ) | ||||
Financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase in deposits |
76,752,040 | 75,072,989 | ||||||
Net increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
8,722,372 | 2,753,153 | ||||||
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank |
||||||||
Issuances |
14,000,000 | 20,000,000 | ||||||
Payments |
(11,000,000 | ) | (500 | ) | ||||
Exercise of common stock options |
100,676 | | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
88,575,088 | 97,826,142 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
(676,250 | ) | 22,249,852 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
47,184,050 | 12,942,129 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 46,507,800 | $ | 35,191,981 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure: |
||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 3,219,730 | $ | 2,727,802 | ||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
$ | 1,521,817 | $ | | ||||
Transfers of securities available-for-sale to held-to-maturity |
$ | 27,655,669 | $ | | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Page 6
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Business - Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (Pinnacle Financial) was formed on February 28, 2000 (inception) and is a bank holding company whose business is conducted by its wholly-owned subsidiary, Pinnacle National Bank (Pinnacle National). Additionally, PFP Title Company is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle National. Pinnacle National is a commercial bank located in Nashville, Tennessee. Pinnacle National provides a full range of banking services in its primary market area of Davidson County and the surrounding counties. Pinnacle National commenced its banking operations on October 27, 2000. PFP Title Company sells title insurance policies to Pinnacle National customers and others. Pinnacle Community Development, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle National and was established to be certified as a Community Development Entity by the Community Development Financial Institutions Fund of the United States Department of the Treasury. PNFP Statutory Trust I, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle Financial, was created for the exclusive purpose of issuing capital trust preferred securities.
Basis of Presentation - These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Pinnacle Financial. Significant intercompany transactions and accounts are eliminated in consolidation, other than the accounts of PNFP Statutory Trust I which are included in these consolidated financial statements pursuant to the equity method of accounting.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in Pinnacle Financials Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the balance sheet date and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses.
Income Per Common Share - Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted. The difference between basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding was attributable to common stock options and warrants.
As of June 30, 2004 and 2003, there were common stock options outstanding to purchase up to 1,039,000 and 862,800 common shares, respectively. All but 700 of these shares have exercise prices which, when considered in relation to the average market price of Pinnacle Financials common stock for the respective reporting period, are considered dilutive and are considered in Pinnacle Financials diluted income per share calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. Additionally, as of June 30, 2004, Pinnacle Financial had dilutive warrants outstanding to purchase 406,000 common shares which have also been considered in the calculation of Pinnacle Financials diluted income per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.
Page 7
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
The following is a summary of the basic and diluted earnings per share calculation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share calculation: |
||||||||||||||||
Numerator - Net income |
$ | 1,168,475 | $ | 536,867 | $ | 2,239,497 | $ | 909,846 | ||||||||
Denominator - Average common shares outstanding |
7,397,920 | 7,384,106 | 7,391,013 | 7,384,106 | ||||||||||||
Basic net income per share |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share calculation: |
||||||||||||||||
Numerator - Net income |
$ | 1,168,475 | $ | 536,867 | $ | 2,239,497 | $ | 909,846 | ||||||||
Denominator - Average common shares outstanding |
7,397,920 | 7,384,106 | 7,391,013 | 7,384,106 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive shares contingently issuable |
881,194 | 377,178 | 855,409 | 338,168 | ||||||||||||
Average dilutive common shares outstanding |
8,279,114 | 7,761,284 | 8,246,422 | 7,722,274 | ||||||||||||
Diluted net income per share |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.12 |
On April 20, 2004, the Board of Directors of Pinnacle Financial approved a two for one stock split of the Companys common stock payable as a 100% stock dividend on May 10, 2004 to shareholders of record on April 30, 2004. Pinnacle Financial has retroactively applied the impact of this stock split in these consolidated financial statements.
Stock-Based Compensation - In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123". This Statement amends Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of Statement No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements. Certain of the disclosure modifications are required for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003 and are included below.
Pinnacle Financial applies APB Opinion 25 and related interpretations in accounting for the equity incentive plans. All option grants carry exercise prices equal to or above the fair value of the common stock on the date of grant. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized. Had compensation cost for Pinnacle Financials equity incentive plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under the plans consistent with the method prescribed in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, Pinnacle Financials net income per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 1,168,475 | $ | 536,867 | $ | 2,239,497 | $ | 909,846 | ||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based
compensation expense
determined under the fair
value based method for all
awards, net of related tax
effects |
(73,305 | ) | (50,059 | ) | (139,925 | ) | (93,968 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 1,095,170 | $ | 486,808 | $ | 2,099,572 | $ | 815,878 | ||||||||
Per share information: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic net income As reported |
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.11 | ||||||||
Diluted net income As reported |
$ | 0.14 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.12 | ||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.13 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.11 |
Page 8
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
For purposes of these calculations, the fair value of options granted for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions:
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Risk free interest rate |
1.00 | % | 1.24 | % | ||||
Expected life of the options |
5.0 years | 5.0 years | ||||||
Expected dividend yield |
0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
28.5 | % | 40.3 | % | ||||
Weighted average fair value |
$ | 3.56 | $ | 2.49 |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements - In March 2004, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments. Current accounting guidance requires the commitment to originate mortgage loans to be held for sale be recognized on the balance sheet at fair value from inception through expiration or funding. SAB 105 requires that the fair-value measurement include only differences between the guaranteed interest rate in the loan commitment and a market interest rate, excluding any expected future cash flows related to the customer relationship or loan servicing. SAB 105 was effective for commitments to originate mortgage loans to be held for sale entered into after March 31, 2004. Its adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial position on results of operations of Pinnacle Financial.
In March 2004, the FASBs Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. The guidance prescribes a three-step model for determining whether an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired and requires disclosures about unrealized losses on investments. The accounting guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004, while the disclosure requirements are effective for annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2004. Pinnacle Financial has adopted the requirements of this EITF.
Business Segments - Pinnacle Financial operates in one business segment, commercial banking, and has no individually significant business segments.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Other comprehensive income refers to revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under generally accepted accounting principles are included in comprehensive income but excluded from net income. Currently, Pinnacle Financials other comprehensive income (loss) consists of unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, on available-for-sale securities.
Reclassifications - Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2004 presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income or loss during any period.
Note 2. Securities
The amortized cost and fair value of securities at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are summarized as follows:
June 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
Value |
|||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agency securities |
$ | 18,800,070 | $ | | $ | (288,394 | ) | $ | 18,511,676 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
117,180,256 | 157,706 | (2,251,795 | ) | 115,086,167 | |||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
2,160,852 | | (106,045 | ) | 2,054,807 | |||||||||||
Corporate notes |
2,321,850 | 2,624 | (84,915 | ) | 2,239,560 | |||||||||||
$ | 140,463,028 | $ | 160,330 | $ | (2,731,149 | ) | $ | 137,892,209 | ||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agency securities |
$ | 17,746,396 | $ | | $ | (806,221 | ) | $ | 16,940,175 | |||||||
State and municipal securities |
9,889,621 | | (503,480 | ) | 9,386,141 | |||||||||||
$ | 27,636,017 | $ | | $ | (1,309,701 | ) | $ | 26,326,316 | ||||||||
Page 9
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
Value |
|||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agency securities |
$ | 27,023,126 | $ | 353,204 | $ | (104,354 | ) | $ | 27,271,976 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
103,087,958 | 506,881 | (616,953 | ) | 102,977,886 | |||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
9,590,357 | 142,970 | (38,951 | ) | 9,694,376 | |||||||||||
$ | 139,701,441 | $ | 1,003,055 | $ | (760,258 | ) | $ | 139,944,238 | ||||||||
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on at least a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of the Pinnacle Financial to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. At June 30, 2004, Pinnacle Financial had two issuances (one mortgage backed-security in the available-for-sale portfolio and one municipal security in the held-to-maturity portfolio) that had been in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve months. At June 30, 2004, the amortized cost of these securities was approximately $2,800,000 compared to a fair value of $2,690,000. Because the declines in fair value noted above were attributable to increases in interest rates and not attributable to credit quality and because Pinnacle Financial has the ability and intent to hold all of these investments until a market price recovery or maturity, these investments were not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
On March 31, 2004, Pinnacle National transferred approximately $27,656,000 of available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity at fair value. The transfer consisted of substantially all of Pinnacle Nationals holdings of Tennessee municipal securities and several of its longer-term agency securities. The net unrealized gain on such securities as of the date of transfer was approximately $325,000. This amount is reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, and will be amortized over the remaining lives of the respective held-to-maturity securities.
Pinnacle Financial realized approximately $248,000 in net gains from the sale of $21,877,000 of available-for-sale securities during the six months ended June 30, 2004, of which none were realized in the second quarter of 2004, and $134,000 in net gains on the sale of $18,945,000 of available-for-sale securities during the six months ended June 30, 2003 of which $116,000 were realized in the second quarter of 2003. Gross realized gains amounted to $312,000 on the sale of $10.9 million of available-for-sale securities while gross realized losses amounted to $64,000 on the sale of $11.0 million of available-for-sale securities during the six months ended June 30, 2004. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, gross realized gains amounted to $148,000 on the sale of $16,929,000 of available-for-sale securities while gross realized losses amounted to $14,000 on the sale of $2,017,000 of available-for-sale securities. At June 30, 2004, approximately $104,635,000 of Pinnacle Financials securities portfolio was pledged to secure public fund deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
Note 3. Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The composition of loans at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 is summarized as follows:
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
$ | 89,309,516 | $ | 68,507,350 | ||||
Commercial real estate Construction |
8,427,763 | 8,210,646 | ||||||
Commercial Other |
152,056,724 | 129,881,732 | ||||||
Total Commercial |
249,794,003 | 206,599,728 | ||||||
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
90,197,112 | 76,041,526 | ||||||
Consumer real estate Construction |
2,876,404 | 3,077,656 | ||||||
Consumer Other |
12,399,488 | 11,285,200 | ||||||
Total Consumer |
105,473,004 | 90,404,382 | ||||||
Total Loans |
355,267,007 | 297,004,110 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(4,465,615 | ) | (3,718,598 | ) | ||||
Loans, net |
$ | 350,801,392 | $ | 293,285,512 | ||||
Page 10
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Using standard industry codes, Pinnacle Financial periodically analyzes its commercial loan portfolio to determine if a concentration of credit risk exists to any one or more industries. Pinnacle Financial has a meaningful credit exposure (loans outstanding plus unfunded lines of credit) to borrowers in the trucking industry and to operators of nonresidential buildings. Credit exposure to the trucking industry approximated $39.3 million and $35.0 million, while credit exposure to operators of nonresidential buildings approximated $23.5 million and $16.6 million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Levels of exposure to these industry groups are periodically evaluated in order to determine if additional allowance allocations are warranted.
At June 30, 2004 and 2003, Pinnacle Financial had certain impaired loans on nonaccruing interest status. The principal balance of these nonaccrual loans amounted to $1,339,000 and $1,095,000 at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. In each case, at the date such loans were placed on nonaccrual, Pinnacle Financial reversed all previously accrued interest income against current year earnings. Had these loans been on accruing status, interest income would have been higher by $7,000 and $50,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Changes in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and for the year ended December 31, 2003 are as follows:
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 3,718,598 | $ | 2,677,043 | ||||
Charged-off loans |
(64,949 | ) | (167,023 | ) | ||||
Recovery of previously charged-off loans |
9,644 | 51,298 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
802,322 | 1,157,280 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 4,465,615 | $ | 3,718,598 | ||||
At June 30, 2004, Pinnacle Financial has granted loans and other extensions of credit amounting to approximately $7,594,000 to certain directors, executive officers, and their related entities of which $5,493,000 had been drawn upon. The terms on these loans and extensions are on substantially the same terms customary for other persons for the type of loan involved.
In December 2003, Pinnacle Financial acquired for $500,000, a $1,500,000 loan which it had previously sold to another financial institution. Pinnacle Financial accounted for the discount under the cost-recovery method pursuant to Practice Bulletin Number 6, Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans, issued by the Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC). Under the cost-recovery method of accounting, cash collections were first applied against the $500,000 recorded amount of the loan; when the loan has been reduced to zero, additional amounts received were recognized as income. During the second quarter of 2004, Pinnacle National collected the remaining net book value of the loan and an additional $260,000, of which $217,000 was recognized as interest income and $43,000 was credited to other expense as a recovery of legal expenses incurred by Pinnacle Financial. As the result of a settlement agreement entered into with the borrower during the quarter, Pinnacle Financial expects to receive additional funds over the next eight years. Pinnacle Financial will recognize these future cash flows as interest income over their expected collection period. At June 30, 2004, the balance of the loan discount associated with these cash flows is approximately $690,000.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, Pinnacle Financial sold participations in certain loans to correspondent banks at an interest rate that was less than that of the borrowers rate of interest. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, Pinnacle Financial has reflected a gain on the sale of these participated loans for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 of approximately $116,000 and $124,000, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 of approximately $238,000 and $126,000, respectively, which is attributable to the present value of the future net cash flows of the difference between the interest payments the borrower is projected to pay Pinnacle Financial and the amount of interest that will be owed the correspondent based on their future participation in the loan. At June 30, 2004, the unamortized asset associated with these cumulative gains approximated $589,000.
Page 11
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 4. Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 consists of the following:
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, |
June 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Current tax expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Federal |
$ | 480,075 | $ | | $ | 1,230,930 | $ | | ||||||||
State |
121,109 | | 230,884 | | ||||||||||||
Total current tax expense |
601,184 | | 1,461,814 | | ||||||||||||
Deferred tax expense (benefit): |
||||||||||||||||
Federal |
(94,062 | ) | 248,941 | (359,687 | ) | 413,249 | ||||||||||
State |
(19,232 | ) | 53,615 | (74,245 | ) | 84,453 | ||||||||||
Total deferred tax expense (benefit) |
(113,294 | ) | 302,556 | (433,932 | ) | 497,702 | ||||||||||
$ | 487,890 | $ | 302,556 | $ | 1,027,882 | $ | 497,702 | |||||||||
Pinnacle Financials income tax expense differs from the amounts computed by applying the Federal income tax statutory rates of 34% in 2004 and 2003 to income before income taxes. A reconciliation of the differences for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Income taxes at statutory rate |
$ | 1,110,908 | $ | 478,566 | ||||
State tax benefit, net of federal tax effect |
107,200 | 55,739 | ||||||
Federal tax credits |
(108,000 | ) | | |||||
Other items |
(82,226 | ) | (36,603 | ) | ||||
Income tax expense |
$ | 1,027,882 | $ | 497,702 | ||||
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that Pinnacle Financial will realize the benefit of these deductible differences. However, the amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be reduced in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced.
The components of deferred income taxes included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are as follows:
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Loan loss allowance |
$ | 1,688,359 | $ | 1,402,434 | ||||
Securities |
858,628 | | ||||||
Other accruals |
78,747 | 109,026 | ||||||
2,625,734 | 1,511,460 | |||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
154,601 | 231,524 | ||||||
Securities |
| 92,263 | ||||||
Other accruals |
39,514 | 140,874 | ||||||
194,115 | 464,664 | |||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
$ | 2,431,619 | $ | 1,046,799 | ||||
Page 12
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 5. Commitments and Contingent Liabilities
In the normal course of business, Pinnacle Financial has entered into off-balance sheet financial instruments which include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit are usually the result of lines of credit granted to existing borrowers under agreements that the total outstanding indebtedness will not exceed a specific amount during the term of the indebtedness. Typical borrowers are commercial concerns that use lines of credit to supplement their treasury management functions, thus their total outstanding indebtedness may fluctuate during any time period based on the seasonality of their business and the resultant timing of their cash flows. Other typical lines of credit are related to home equity loans granted to consumers. Commitments to extend credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.
Standby letters of credit are generally issued on behalf of an applicant (our customer) to a specifically named beneficiary and are the result of a particular business arrangement that exists between the applicant and the beneficiary. Standby letters of credit have fixed expiration dates and are usually for terms of two years or less unless terminated beforehand due to criteria specified in the standby letter of credit. A typical arrangement involves the applicant routinely being indebted to the beneficiary for such items as inventory purchases, insurance, utilities, lease guarantees or other third party commercial transactions. The standby letter of credit would permit the beneficiary to obtain payment from Pinnacle Financial under certain prescribed circumstances. Subsequently, Pinnacle Financial would then seek reimbursement from the applicant pursuant to the terms of the standby letter of credit.
Pinnacle Financial follows the same credit policies and underwriting practices when making these commitments as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. Each customers creditworthiness is evaluated on a case-by-case basis and the amount of collateral obtained, if any, is based on managements credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral held varies but may include cash, real estate and improvements, marketable securities, accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, and personal property.
The contractual amounts of these commitments are not reflected in the consolidated financial statements and would only be reflected if drawn upon. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the contractual amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. However, should the commitments be drawn upon and should our customers default on their resulting obligation to us, Pinnacle Financials maximum exposure to credit loss, without consideration of collateral, is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments.
A summary of Pinnacle Financials total contractual amount for all off-balance sheet commitments at June 30, 2004 is as follows:
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 119,431,000 | ||
Standby letters of credit |
$ | 42,518,000 |
At June 30, 2004, the fair value of Pinnacle Financials standby letters of credit was $183,000. This amount represents the unamortized fee associated with these standby letters of credit and is included in the consolidated balance sheet of Pinnacle Financial. This fair value will decrease over time as the existing standby letters of credit approach their expiration dates.
In the normal course of business, Pinnacle Financial may become involved in various legal proceedings. As of June 30, 2004, the management of Pinnacle Financial is not aware of any such proceedings against Pinnacle Financial.
Note 6. Equity Incentive Plans
Pinnacle Financial has equity incentive plans under which it has granted options to its employees to purchase common stock at or above the fair market value on the date of grant Additionally, Pinnacle Financials 2004 equity
Page 13
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
incentive plan provides for the granting of restricted share awards and performance-based awards, such as stock appreciation rights. As of June 30, 2004, the only grants made from these plans have been in the form of stock options. All of the options that have been granted are intended to be incentive stock options qualifying under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code for favorable tax treatment. Options under the plan vest in varying increments over five years beginning one year after the date of the grant and are exercisable over a period of ten years from the date of grant.
A summary of the plan changes for the three-month period ended June 30, 2004 is as follows:
Weighted-Average | ||||||||
Number |
Exercise Price |
|||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2003 |
907,400 | $ | 5.39 | |||||
Granted |
153,980 | 13.14 | ||||||
Exercised |
(20,480 | ) | 4.82 | |||||
Forfeited |
(1,900 | ) | 4.73 | |||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2004 |
1,039,000 | $ | 6.55 | |||||
The following table summarizes information about Pinnacle Financials stock option plan at June 30, 2004:
Number of | Weighted- | |||||||||||||||||
Remaining | Weighted-Average | Average | Number of | |||||||||||||||
Grant date | Shares | Contractual | Exercise | Shares | ||||||||||||||
by year |
Outstanding |
Life in Years |
Price |
Exercisable |
||||||||||||||
2000 | 362,400 | 6.8 | $ | 3.82 | 217,440 | |||||||||||||
2001 | 94,540 | 7.5 | 3.88 | 56,304 | ||||||||||||||
2002 | 245,480 | 7.8 | 5.01 | 96,272 | ||||||||||||||
2003 | 182,600 | 8.9 | 7.55 | 27,360 | ||||||||||||||
2004 | 153,980 | 9.8 | 13.14 | | ||||||||||||||
1,039,000 | 7.7 | $ | 6.55 | 397,376 | ||||||||||||||
Note 7. Regulatory Matters
Pinnacle National is subject to certain restrictions on the amount of dividends that may be declared without prior regulatory approval. Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National are subject to various other regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Pinnacle Financials and Pinnacle Nationals capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier I capital to risk-weighted assets and of Tier I capital to average assets. Management believes, as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Pinnacle National must maintain minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle Nationals actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table (dollars in thousands):
Page 14
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Minimum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
To Be Well-Capitalized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum | Under Prompt | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital | Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual |
Requirement |
Action Provisions |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
Ratio |
|||||||||||||||||||
At June 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 51,312 | 11.2 | % | $ | 36,613 | 8.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 49,272 | 10.8 | % | $ | 36,575 | 8.0 | % | $ | 45,719 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 46,836 | 10.2 | % | $ | 18,306 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 44,676 | 9.8 | % | $ | 18,287 | 4.0 | % | $ | 27,431 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 46,836 | 8.4 | % | $ | 22,209 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 44,676 | 8.1 | % | $ | 22,190 | 4.0 | % | $ | 27,737 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 47,914 | 12.8 | % | $ | 29,981 | 8.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 38,617 | 10.3 | % | $ | 29,944 | 8.0 | % | $ | 37,430 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 44,185 | 11.8 | % | $ | 14,990 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 34,888 | 9.3 | % | $ | 14,972 | 4.0 | % | $ | 22,458 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 44,185 | 9.7 | % | $ | 18,188 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 34,888 | 7.7 | % | $ | 18,188 | 4.0 | % | $ | 22,735 | 5.0 | % |
(*) | Average assets for the above calculations were as of the most recent quarter for each period noted. |
In connection with approving Pinnacle Financials issuance of $10 million of Trust Preferred Securities, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (FRB-Atlanta) required Pinnacle Financial to maintain a Total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 10%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 6% and a Tier 1 capital to average-assets ratio of 5% during the year ended December 31, 2004. Furthermore, and in order to provide additional assurance to the FRB-Atlanta as to the maintenance of these ratios, Pinnacle Financials President and Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer agreed to exercise their common stock warrant agreements should it become apparent that maintenance of the ratios at the required levels would not occur otherwise during the year ended December 31, 2004.
Note 8. Investments in Affiliated Companies
Investments in affiliated companies accounted for under the equity method consist of 100% of the common stock of PNFP Statutory Trust I (Trust), a wholly-owned statutory business trust. The Trust was formed on December 30, 2003. Summary financial information for the Trust as of June 30, 2004 follows (dollars in thousands):
Asset - Investment in subordinated debentures issued by Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 10,310 | ||
Liabilities - Trust preferred securities |
$ | 10,000 | ||
Equity - Common stock (100% owned by Pinnacle Financial) |
310 | |||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 10,310 | ||
Page 15
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 9. Subsequent Event
On July 23, 2004, Pinnacle Financial filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission in order to register up to 850,000 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock plus an additional 15% pursuant to the underwriters over allotment allocation for sale to the public. If consummated, Pinnacle Financial will use the proceeds of this capital issuance to support the continued growth of Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National. Pinnacle Financial believes that the proceeds from this offering will allow Pinnacle Financial to meet capital level commitments to FRB-Atlanta for 2004 and should provide, under current regulatory guidelines, the regulatory capital Pinnacle Financial needs to support its anticipated growth for the foreseeable future.
Page 16
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following is a discussion of our financial condition at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and our results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. The purpose of this discussion is to focus on information about our financial condition and results of operations which is not otherwise apparent from the consolidated financial statements. You should read the following discussion and analysis along with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere herein.
Overview
General. Pinnacle Financials rapid growth from its inception through the second quarter of 2004 continues to have a material impact on Pinnacle Financials financial condition and results of operations. This rapid growth resulted in net income for the three months ended June 30, 2004 of $0.14 per diluted share as compared to $0.07 per diluted share for the three months ended June 30, 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, net income per diluted share amounted to $0.27 per diluted share as compared to $0.12 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, 2003. At June 30, 2004, loans totaled $355 million, as compared to $297 million at December 31, 2003, while total deposits were $467 million at June 30, 2004 compared to $391 million at December 31, 2003.
Results of Operations. Pinnacle Financials net interest income increased from $3.0 million in the second quarter of 2003 to $4.5 million in 2004. Net interest income for the first six months of 2004 was $8.7 million compared to $5.6 million for the same period in 2003. The net interest margin (the ratio of net interest income to average earning assets for the period) was 3.51% for both periods in 2004 compared to 3.48% for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 3.43% for the six months ended June 30, 2003.
The increase in loan volumes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 was the primary cause for the $102,000 and $168,000 increase, respectively, in Pinnacle Financials provision for loan losses when compared to the same periods in 2003. As Pinnacle Financials loan portfolio continues to grow, Pinnacle Financial expects that it will continue to record a provision for loan losses approximately consistent with the growth in the loan portfolio.
Noninterest income for the first three and six months of 2004 compared to the same time periods in 2003 increased by $306,000, or 35%, and $1,069,000, or 80%, respectively. The increases between 2004 and 2003 were due to Pinnacle Financial initiating a mortgage origination unit during early 2003; increases in investment services revenues between the periods; and increases in gains on the sales of securities available-for-sale and loans.
Pinnacle Financials growth for the first six months of 2004 when compared to the same time period in 2003 resulted in an increase of approximately $2.1 million in noninterest expense related to salaries and employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses and other operating expenses. As Pinnacle Financial increased its number of full-time equivalent employees from 73.5 at June 30, 2004 to 101.5 at June 30, 2004, Pinnacle Financial experienced an approximately $1,458,000 increase in compensation and employee benefit expense. Pinnacle Financial expects to add additional employees throughout 2004 which will cause Pinnacle Financials compensation and employee benefit expense to increase in future periods. Pinnacle Financials branch expansion efforts in 2003 also resulted in increased noninterest expense for 2003 and the first six months of 2004. The increased operational expenses for the branches opened in 2003 and the expected opening of two additional branches in 2004 will continue to result in increased noninterest expense in future periods. Although Pinnacle Financials expenses increased in 2004 when compared to 2003, Pinnacle Financials efficiency ratio, the ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and noninterest income, decreased from 70.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to 63.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2004.
Furthermore, we believe that a rising interest rate environment, which we believe is more likely than a falling rate environment over the next few quarters, will result in increased earnings for us over that of a falling or stagnant rate environment. Currently, approximately 52.4% of our loan volumes are floating rate loans that reprice with adjustments to our prime lending rate or other similarly published overnite interest rate indices. We also believe we will continue to grow our balance sheet with continued emphasis on floating rate lending. The additional revenues
Page 17
provided by these two items should be sufficient to overcome any immediate increases in funding costs which would also be incurred in a rising rate environment.
Conversely, a falling rate environment would serve to have the opposite effect on our earnings. Additionally, in a falling rate environment, we may not be able to reduce our deposit funding costs by any meaningful amount due to market pressures, while our interest income would decrease at a more rapid pace, as we do not believe interest rate floors which are included in many of our floating rate loan documents could be practically enforced.
Financial Condition. The $58 million increase in loans during the first six months of 2004 contributed to the increase in Pinnacle Financials net income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 when compared to an increase of $46 million for the similar period in 2003. This increase in volume offset the decrease in average yields on loans between 2004 and 2003. As Pinnacle Financial seeks to increase its loan portfolio it must also continue to monitor the risks inherent in its lending operations. If Pinnacle Financials allowance for loan losses is not sufficient to cover loan losses in Pinnacle Financials loan portfolio, increases to the allowance for loan losses would be required which would decrease Pinnacle Financials earnings.
Pinnacle Financial has successfully grown its total deposits to $467 million at June 30, 2004. This growth in deposits has allowed Pinnacle Financial to fund its asset growth at a lower cost in 2004 than in 2003. While rates paid on deposits decreased during the first six months of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003, Pinnacle Financial, for competitive reasons, has typically adjusted its deposit rates more slowly than its loan yields during a period of declining interest rates. As such, Pinnacle Financials deposit funding costs do not decrease as quickly as do revenues from interest income on earning assets, thus reducing Pinnacle Financials net interest margin. In addition, Pinnacle Financial believes that in certain cases rates paid on deposits have decreased to such levels that further reductions could put Pinnacle Financial at a competitive disadvantage as customers seek higher returns on their balances. The reverse impact would likely result in a scenario of rising interest rates.
Capital and Liquidity. On December 30, 2003, Pinnacle Financial issued $10 million in subordinated debt which bears interest at a floating rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR, which is set each quarter, and matures on December 30, 2033. Pursuant to current regulatory guidelines, all of this issuance is classified as Tier 1 capital for regulatory capital purposes for Pinnacle Financial. At June 30, 2004, Pinnacle Financials capital ratios, including Pinnacle Nationals capital ratios, met regulatory minimum capital requirements. Additionally, at June 30, 2004, Pinnacle National would be considered to be well-capitalized pursuant to banking regulations.
On July 23, 2004, Pinnacle Financial filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission in order to register up to 850,000 shares of Pinnacle Financial common stock plus an additional 15% pursuant to the underwriters over allotment allocation for sale to the public. If consummated, Pinnacle Financial will use the proceeds of this capital issuance to support the continued growth of Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National. Pinnacle Financial believes that the proceeds from this offering will allow Pinnacle Financial to continue to meet capital level commitments to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta through the remainder of 2004 and should provide, under current regulatory guidelines, the regulatory capital Pinnacle Financial needs to support its anticipated growth for the foreseeable future.
Critical Accounting Estimates
The accounting principles we follow and our methods of applying these principles conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and with general practices within the banking industry. In connection with the application of those principles, we have made judgments and estimates which, in the case of the determination of our allowance for loan losses (ALL), have been critical to the determination of our financial position and results of operations.
Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL). Our management assesses the adequacy of the ALL prior to the end of each calendar quarter. This assessment includes procedures to estimate the allowance and test the adequacy and appropriateness of the resulting balance. The ALL consists of two portions (1) an allocated amount representative of specifically identified credit exposure and exposures readily predictable by historical or comparative experience;
Page 18
and (2) an unallocated amount representative of inherent loss which is not readily identifiable. Even though the ALL is composed of two components, the entire ALL is available to absorb any credit losses.
We establish the allocated amount separately for two different risk groups (1) unique loans (commercial loans, including those loans considered impaired); and (2) homogeneous loans (generally consumer loans). We base the allocation for unique loans primarily on risk rating grades assigned to each of these loans as a result of our loan management and review processes. We then assign each risk-rating grade a loss ratio, which is determined based on the experience of management, discussions with banking regulators and our independent loan review process. We estimate losses on impaired loans based on estimated cash flows discounted at the loans original effective interest rate or based on the underlying collateral value. Based on managements experience, we also assign loss ratios to our consumer portfolio. These loss ratios are assigned to the various homogenous categories of the consumer portfolio (e.g., automobile, residential mortgage, home equity).
The unallocated amount is particularly subjective and does not lend itself to exact mathematical calculation. The unallocated amount represents estimated inherent credit losses which may exist, but have not yet been identified, as of the balance sheet date. In estimating the unallocated amount, such matters as changes in the local or national economy, the depth or experience in the lending staff, any concentrations of credit in any particular industry group, and new banking laws or regulations. After we assess applicable factors, we evaluate the aggregate unallocated amount based on our managements experience.
We then test the resulting ALL balance by comparing the balance in the ALL to historical trends and peer information. Our management then evaluates the result of the procedures performed, including the result of our testing, and concludes on the appropriateness of the balance of the ALL in its entirety. The audit committee of our board of directors reviews the assessment prior to the filing of quarterly and annual financial information.
In assessing the adequacy of the ALL, we also rely on an ongoing independent loan review process. We undertake this process both to ascertain whether there are loans in the portfolio whose credit quality has weakened over time and to assist in our overall evaluation of the risk characteristics of the entire loan portfolio. Our loan review process includes the judgment of management, the input from our independent loan reviewer, who is not an employee of Pinnacle National, and reviews that may have been conducted by bank regulatory agencies as part of their usual examination process.
Results of Operations
Our results for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were highlighted by the continued growth in loans and other earning assets and deposits, which resulted in increased revenues and expenses. The net income for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was $1,168,000 and $537,000, respectively, while the net income for the first six months of 2004 was $2,239,000 compared to $910,000 for the first six months of 2003 as follows:
Three Months | Six Months | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, |
Percent | Ended June 30, |
Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
Increase |
2004 |
2003 |
Increase |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 6,225 | $ | 4,369 | 43 | % | $ | 11,892 | $ | 8,315 | 43 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,689 | 1,385 | 22 | 3,204 | 2,694 | 19 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
4,536 | 2,984 | 52 | 8,688 | 5,621 | 55 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
449 | 347 | 29 | 802 | 635 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
4,087 | 2,637 | 55 | 7,886 | 4,986 | 58 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
1,183 | 877 | 35 | 2,408 | 1,339 | 80 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
3,615 | 2,675 | 35 | 7,027 | 4,917 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income before taxes |
1,655 | 839 | 97 | 3,267 | 1,408 | 132 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
487 | 302 | 61 | 1,028 | 498 | 106 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,168 | $ | 537 | 118 | % | $ | 2,239 | $ | 910 | 146 | % | ||||||||||||
Net Interest Income. Net interest income represents the amount by which interest earned on various earning assets exceeds interest paid on deposits and other interest bearing liabilities and is the most significant component of our
Page 19
earnings. For the three months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded net interest income of $4,536,000, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.51% for the period. For the three months ended June 30, 2003, we recorded net interest income of $2,984,000, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.48% for the period. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we recorded net interest income of $8,688,000, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.51% for the period. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, we recorded net interest income of $5,621,000, which resulted in a net interest margin of 3.43% for the period.
During the first quarter of 2003, the Federal Reserve Open Market Committee lowered the Federal funds rates from 1.25% to 1.00% and it remained 1.00% until June 30, 2004 when the Open Market Committee increased the Federal funds rate to 1.25%. Our management believes this historically low interest rate environment continues to have a negative impact on our net interest income as a significant number of our customers are adjustable rate borrowers with their lines of credit tied primarily to our prime lending rate which declined in lock-step with the Federal funds rate declines.
The following tables set forth the amount of our average balances, interest income or interest expense for each category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the average interest rate for total interest-earning assets and total interest-bearing liabilities, net interest spread and net yield on average interest-earning assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):
Three months ended | Three months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 |
June 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances |
Interest |
Rate(1) |
Balances |
Interest |
Rate(1) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 343,974 | $ | 4,506 | 5.27 | % | $ | 245,383 | $ | 3,357 | 5.49 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
157,547 | 1,555 | 3.97 | 90,563 | 930 | 4.12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
11,645 | 99 | 4.39 | 4,788 | 42 | 4.46 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
11,055 | 25 | 0.91 | 4,757 | 13 | 1.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
2,849 | 40 | 6.40 | 2,180 | 27 | 5.44 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
527,070 | 6,225 | 4.78 | 347,671 | 4,370 | 5.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-earning assets |
28,367 | 17,714 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 555,437 | $ | 365,385 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest checking |
37,755 | 44 | 0.47 | % | 13,571 | 24 | 0.58 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Savings and money market |
155,214 | 297 | 0.77 | 79,262 | 243 | 1.08 | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
174,183 | 987 | 2.28 | 120,434 | 853 | 2.59 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
367,152 | 1,328 | 1.45 | 213,267 | 1,120 | 1.88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
17,523 | 11 | 0.26 | 14,106 | 12 | 0.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and other |
4,467 | 14 | 1.28 | 4,248 | 15 | 1.72 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
45,736 | 245 | 2.16 | 29,994 | 238 | 2.51 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
10,310 | 91 | 3.54 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
445,188 | 1,689 | 1.53 | 261,615 | 1,385 | 1.90 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing demand deposits |
72,812 | | | 30,278 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits and interest-bearing
liabilities |
518,000 | 1,689 | 1.31 | 291,893 | 1,385 | 1.68 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
1,895 | 1,540 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
35,542 | 32,675 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 555,437 | $ | 326,108 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 4,536 | $ | 2,985 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread (2) |
3.25 | % | 3.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (3) |
3.51 | % | 3.48 | % |
Page 20
Six months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2004 |
June 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Yield/ | Average | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balances |
Interest |
Rate(1) |
Balances |
Interest |
Rate(1) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 326,159 | $ | 8,452 | 5.22 | % | $ | 231,537 | $ | 6,320 | 5.48 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
148,777 | 3,106 | 4.20 | 86,846 | 1,834 | 4.25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt |
10,720 | 185 | 4.47 | 4,392 | 85 | 4.51 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
16,539 | 75 | 0.91 | 5,107 | 25 | 0.97 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
2,625 | 73 | 6.30 | 2,068 | 51 | 5.45 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets |
504,820 | 11,891 | 4.77 | 329,949 | 8,315 | 5.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-earning assets |
27,028 | 15,798 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 531,848 | $ | 345,747 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest checking |
35,307 | 85 | 0.49 | % | 15,057 | 45 | 0.60 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Savings and money market |
150,973 | 583 | 0.78 | 84,924 | 449 | 1.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
167,870 | 1,831 | 2.19 | 126,222 | 1,698 | 2.70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
354,150 | 2,499 | 1.42 | 226,204 | 2,192 | 1.94 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
16,195 | 21 | 0.26 | 12,917 | 27 | 0.42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and other |
2,234 | 14 | 1.28 | 3,840 | 31 | 1.61 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
44,058 | 476 | 2.17 | 34,066 | 444 | 2.62 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
10,310 | 193 | 3.76 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
426,947 | 3,203 | 1.51 | 277,027 | 2,694 | 1.95 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing demand deposits |
67,133 | | | 34,364 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits and interest-bearing
liabilities |
594,080 | 3,203 | 1.30 | 311,391 | 2,694 | 1.74 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
2,144 | 1,547 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholders equity |
35,624 | 32,809 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 531,848 | $ | 345,747 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 8,688 | $ | 5,621 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread (2) |
3.26 | % | 3.12 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin (3) |
3.51 | % | 3.43 | % |
(1) | Yields computed on tax-exempt instruments on a tax equivalent basis. | |
(2) | Yields realized on interest-earning assets less the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. | |
(3) | Net interest margin is the result of annualized net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets for the period. |
As noted above, the net interest margin for the second quarter of 2004 was 3.51% compared to a net interest margin of 3.48% for the same period in 2003, an increase of 0.03%. The net interest margin for the first six months of 2004 was 3.51% compared to a net interest margin of 3.43% for the same period in 2003, an increase of 0.08%. The net change in the net interest margin was relatively small because the net decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets between the two periods approximated the net decrease in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Other matters related to the changes in net interest income, net interest yields and rates, and net interest margin are presented below:
| Our loan yields decreased from 2003 to 2004. Approximately 53% of our loans are floating rate loans whereby the interest rate charged the borrower is tied, in substantially all cases, to our prime rate. For substantially all of the first six months of 2003, through June 25, 2003, our prime rate was 4.25% compared to a prime rate of 4% for essentially all of the first six months of 2004. |
| During 2004, we were able to grow our funding base significantly. For asset/liability management purposes in 2004, we elected to allocate a greater proportion of such funds to our securities portfolio versus our loan portfolio than in 2003. Our securities portfolio generally has lower yields than do loans. |
Page 21
| During 2004, overall deposit rates were less than those rates for the comparable period in 2003. In some cases, rates for 2004 have decreased to such levels that further decreases in deposit rates approach what we term embedded floors or rates that it is not reasonable or practical to go below, such that further decreases in deposit rates could place us in a competitive disadvantage as customers seek higher returns on their balances. Changes in interest rates paid on such products as interest checking, savings and money market, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and Federal funds purchased will increase or decrease in a manner that is consistent with changes in the short-term rate environment. During 2004, and as was the case with our prime lending rate, short-term rates were less in 2004 than in 2003. We also monitor the pricing of similar products by our primary competitors. The changes in the short-term rate environment and the information we obtained from price shopping our primary competitors allowed us to reduce these rates in 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. |
| The short- and long-term rate environment also impacts rates paid on certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB, however, these items are also impacted by our decisions to alter the mix of maturities of the underlying accounts within these items. Furthermore, the timing of the initial sale of the certificate of deposit or the funding of the FHLB advance also impacts the rates paid on these items. Our results were impacted by certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB that had been acquired during periods of higher interest rates. Such items matured during the interim period between the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and were replaced by certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB which had lower interest rates. These matters contributed to the reduction in the rates paid on certificates of deposit and advances from the FHLB between the two periods. |
| Also impacting the net interest margin during the first three and six months of 2004 was the issuance of subordinated indebtedness. This indebtedness was issued at the end of 2003, thus it did not impact the prior periods results. |
Rate and Volume Analysis. As noted above, net interest income increased by $3,067,000 between the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. The following is an analysis of the changes in our net interest income comparing the changes attributable to rates and those attributable to volumes (dollars in thousands):
Increase (decrease) due to |
Total increase | |||||||||||
Dollar change in interest income and expense |
Volume |
Rate |
(decrease) |
|||||||||
Interest-earning assets: |
||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 2,479 | $ | (347 | ) | $ | 2,132 | |||||
Securities: |
||||||||||||
Taxable |
1,361 | (93 | ) | 1,268 | ||||||||
Tax-exempt |
105 | | 105 | |||||||||
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under
agreements to resell |
49 | | 49 | |||||||||
Other |
12 | 10 | 22 | |||||||||
4,006 | (430 | ) | 3,576 | |||||||||
Interest-bearing liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Interest checking |
$ | 52 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | 40 | |||||
Savings and money market accounts |
269 | (134 | ) | 135 | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
543 | (410 | ) | 133 | ||||||||
Total interest-bearing deposits |
864 | (556 | ) | 308 | ||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
6 | (13 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||
Federal funds purchased |
(11 | ) | (5 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
126 | (95 | ) | 31 | ||||||||
Subordinated debt |
193 | | 193 | |||||||||
1,178 | (669 | ) | 509 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in net interest income |
$ | 2,828 | $ | 239 | $ | 3,067 | ||||||
(1) | The above amounts are presented on a fully tax equivalent basis. | |
(2) | Changes in net interest income are attributed to either changes in average balances (volume change) or changes in average rates (rate change) for earning assets and sources of funds on which interest is received or paid. Volume change is calculated as change in volume times the previous rate while rate change is calculated as a change in rate times the previous volume. The |
Page 22
change attributed to rates and volumes (change in rate times change in volume) is allocated between volume change and rate change at the ratio of how much each component bears to the absolute value of their total. |
In December 2003, we acquired for $500,000 a $1,500,000 loan which it had previously sold to another financial institution. Through June 30, 2004, we accounted for the discount under the cost-recovery method pursuant to Practice Bulletin Number 6, Amortization of Discounts on Certain Acquired Loans, issued by the Accounting Standards Executive Committee (AcSEC). Under the cost-recovery method of accounting, cash collections are first applied against the $500,000 recorded amount of the loan; when the loan has been reduced to zero, any additional amounts received are recognized as income. During the second quarter of 2004, we collected the remaining net book value of the loan and an additional $260,000, of which $217,000 was recognized as interest income and $43,000 was credited to other expense as a recovery of legal expenses incurred by us. As the result of a settlement agreement entered into with the borrower during the quarter, we expect to receive additional funds over the next eight years. We will recognize these future cash flows as interest income over their expected collection period. At June 30, 2004, the balance of the loan discount associated with these cash flows is approximately $690,000.
Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents a charge to earnings necessary to establish an allowance for loan losses that, in our managements evaluation, should be adequate to provide coverage for the inherent losses on outstanding loans. The provision for loan losses amounted to $448,000 and $347,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Additionally, the provision for loan losses amounted to $802,000 and $635,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively
Based upon our managements evaluation of the loan portfolio, our management believes the allowance for loan losses to be adequate to absorb our estimate of probable losses existing in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The increase in the provision for loan losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 when compared to the three months and six months ended June 30, 2003 was primarily due to the increase in loans throughout 2004 when compared to 2003 offset by lower net charge-offs for 2004 compared to 2003.
Based upon our managements assessment of the loan portfolio, we adjust our ALL to an amount deemed appropriate to adequately cover inherent risks in the loan portfolio. While our policies and procedures used to estimate the ALL, as well as the resultant provision for loan losses charged to operations, are considered adequate by our management and are reviewed from time to time by Pinnacle Nationals regulators, they are necessarily approximate and imprecise. There exist factors beyond our control, such as general economic conditions both locally and nationally, which may negatively impact, materially, the adequacy of our ALL and, thus, the resulting provision for loan losses.
Noninterest Income. Pinnacle Financials noninterest income is composed of several components, some of which vary significantly between quarterly periods. Service charges on deposit accounts and other noninterest income generally reflect Pinnacle Financials growth, while investment services and fees from the origination of mortgage loans will often reflect market conditions and fluctuate from period to period. The opportunities for recognition of gains on loan participations sold and gain on sales of investment securities may also vary widely from quarter to quarter.
The following is the makeup of our noninterest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, |
Percent | June 30, |
Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
$ | 231 | $ | 120 | 93 | % | $ | 395 | $ | 222 | 78 | % | ||||||||||||
Investment services |
405 | 176 | 130 | 794 | 332 | 139 | ||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage lending income |
266 | 198 | 34 | 458 | 244 | 88 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gain on loan participations sold |
116 | 124 | (6 | ) | 238 | 126 | 89 | |||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of investment securities, net |
| 117 | | 248 | 134 | 85 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other noninterest income |
165 | 142 | 16 | 275 | 281 | 98 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
$ | 1,183 | $ | 877 | 35 | % | $ | 2,408 | $ | 1,339 | 80 | % | ||||||||||||
Page 23
As shown, the largest component of noninterest income is commissions and fees from our financial advisory unit, Pinnacle Asset Management, a division of Pinnacle National. At June 30, 2004, Pinnacle Asset Management was receiving commissions and fees in connection with approximately $344 million in brokerage assets held with Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. compared to $202 million at June 30, 2003.
Service charge income for 2004 increased over that of 2003 due to an increase in both the balance and number of deposit accounts subject to service charges. Additionally, mortgage related fees, attributable to Pinnacle National beginning a mortgage origination unit during the first quarter of 2003, also provided for a significant portion of the increase in noninterest income between 2004 and 2003. These mortgage fees are for loans originated by Pinnacle National and subsequently sold to third-party investors. All loans are sold whereby servicing rights transfer to the buyer. Generally, mortgage origination fees increase in lower interest rate environments and decrease in rising interest rate environments. As a result, mortgage origination fees may fluctuate greatly in response to a changing rate environment.
Another noninterest income item for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 was related to our sale of certain loan participations to our correspondent banks that were primarily related to new lending transactions in excess of internal loan limits. At June 30, 2004 and pursuant to participation agreements with these correspondents, we had participated approximately $59 million of originated loans to these other banks compared to $44 million at June 30, 2003. These participation agreements have various provisions regarding collateral position, pricing and other matters. Many of these agreements provide that we pay the correspondent less than the loans contracted interest rate. Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125, we recorded $116,000, which represents the net present value of these future net revenues, as a gain on sale of participations in our results of operations during the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $124,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2003. Additionally, we recorded gains on loan participations sold of $238,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $126,000 for the same period in 2003. At June 30, 2004, the unamortized asset associated with these cumulative gains approximated $589,000. We intend to maintain relationships with our correspondents in order to participate future loans to these correspondents in a similar manner. However, the timing of participations may cause the level of gains, if any, to vary significantly.
Also included in noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2004, were net gains of approximately $248,000 realized from the sale of approximately $22 million of available-for-sale securities. This compares to $134,000 in gains on the sale of investment securities for the same period in the prior year.
During the year ended December 31, 2002, Pinnacle National acquired life insurance policies on five key executives. Pinnacle National is the beneficiary of the death proceeds from these policies. To acquire these policies, Pinnacle National paid a one-time premium of $1.8 million and, in return, Pinnacle National was guaranteed an initial crediting rate for the first year of the contracts which is then reset quarterly thereafter. This crediting rate serves to increase the cash surrender value of the policies over the life of the policies and amounted to approximately $18,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $25,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2003. Additionally, the crediting rate increased the cash surrender value of the policies by $43,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $50,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2003. At June 30, 2004, the aggregate cash surrender value of these policies, which is reflected in other assets on our consolidated balance sheet, was $1,974,000. Pinnacle National has not borrowed any funds against these policies as of June 30, 2004.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense consists of salaries and employee benefits, equipment and occupancy expenses, and other operating expenses. The following is the makeup of our noninterest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (dollars in thousands):
Page 24
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, |
Percent | June 30, |
Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
2004 |
2003 |
Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
Compensation and employee benefits |
$ | 2,320 | $ | 1,694 | 37 | % | $ | 4,587 | $ | 3,129 | 47 | % | ||||||||||||
Equipment and occupancy |
535 | 446 | 20 | 1,041 | 843 | 23 | ||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and other business development |
156 | 104 | 50 | 305 | 179 | 70 | ||||||||||||||||||
Administrative |
316 | 184 | 72 | 537 | 322 | 67 | ||||||||||||||||||
Postage and supplies |
124 | 106 | 17 | 223 | 179 | 25 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other noninterest expense |
164 | 141 | 16 | 334 | 265 | 26 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
$ | 3,615 | $ | 2,675 | 35 | % | $ | 7,027 | $ | 4,917 | 43 | % | ||||||||||||
Expenses have increased during the above periods due to personnel additions occurring throughout the periods, the continued development of our branch network and other expenses which increase in relation to our growth rate. We anticipate increases in our expenses during 2004 for such items as additional personnel, the opening of additional branches, legal and audit expenses and other expenses which tend to increase in relation to our growth.
At June 30, 2004, we employed 101.5 full time equivalent employees compared to 73.5 at June 30, 2003. We intend to continue to add employees to our work force during 2004, which will cause our salary costs to increase in future periods. Also, during 2003 we opened two new branch offices in the Rivergate area of Nashville and in the Cool Springs area of Williamson County. The additional costs to operate these branches also served to increase our occupancy and equipment expenses in 2004 over that of 2003 due to the branches only being open for partial years in 2003. Our intent is to open additional branch offices in 2004 which will also cause expenses to increase in future periods.
Our efficiency ratio (ratio of noninterest expense to the sum of net interest income and noninterest income) was 63.2% in the second quarter of 2004 compared to 69.3% in the second quarter of 2003. The efficiency ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was 63.3% compared to 70.6% for the same period in 2003. The efficiency ratio measures the amount of expense that is incurred to generate a dollar of revenue. Although our absolute expense level increased between the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the efficiency ratio improved.
We believe that variable pay incentives are a valuable tool in motivating an employee base that is focused on providing our clients effective financial advice and increasing shareholder value. As a result, and in what we believe differentiates us from many other financial institutions, substantially all of our employees are eligible for variable pay incentives. Included in the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are personnel expense amounts of $360,000 and $331,000 in costs related to the accrual of these variable pay awards. Included in the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are personnel expense amounts of $650,000 and $512,000 in costs related to these variable pay awards. The increase in awards in 2004 from the previous year was primarily due to increases in number of personnel. The incentive plan for 2004 is structured similarly to that of the 2003 plan. Because of the relative experience of our associates, our compensation costs are and will continue to be higher on a per associate basis than most financial institutions. According to Americas Community Banker 2003 Compensation Survey, the nationwide average for a bank with the same asset size as ours was 164 full time employees. As noted above, at June 30, 2004, we employed 101.5 full time employees.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax expense rate for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was approximately 29.5% compared to an effective income tax expense rate for the three months ended June 30, 2003 of approximately 36.0%. The effective income tax expense rate for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was approximately 31.5% compared to an effective income tax expense rate for the six months ended June 30, 2003 of approximately 35.4%. The reduction in the effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2004 was primarily due to Federal tax credits related to the New Markets Tax Credit program whereby a subsidiary of Pinnacle National has been awarded approximately $2.3 million in future Federal tax credits to be realized over the next seven years. The credit that is available for the year ended December 31, 2004 is $300,000. Pinnacle Financial believes that it and its subsidiary will be able to comply with the various regulatory provisions of the New Markets Tax Credit program during 2004 such that it will be able to claim the credit in its 2004 Federal income tax return.
Page 25
Quarterly Information. The following is a summary of quarterly balance sheet and results of operations information for the last six quarters (dollars in thousands, except per share data).
June | March | December | September | June | March | |||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2004 |
2003 |
2003 |
2003 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance sheet data, at quarter end: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 586,313 | 541,052 | 498,421 | 440,693 | 403,229 | 348,366 | |||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
355,267 | 323,416 | 297,004 | 279,702 | 255,448 | 228,842 | ||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(4,466 | ) | (4,042 | ) | (3,719 | ) | (3,492 | ) | (3,189 | ) | (2,860 | ) | ||||||||||||
Securities |
165,528 | 162,315 | 139,944 | 115,421 | 99,968 | 94,600 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits |
467,321 | 437,601 | 390,569 | 347,191 | 309,089 | 266,732 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements
to repurchase |
23,772 | 14,699 | 15,050 | 19,291 | 17,803 | 15,846 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
47,500 | 40,500 | 44,500 | 39,500 | 41,500 | 32,500 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
10,310 | 10,310 | 10,310 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
35,125 | 36,266 | 34,336 | 33,245 | 33,627 | 32,403 | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance sheet data, quarterly averages: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 555,437 | 508,260 | 454,700 | 406,142 | 365,385 | 326,108 | |||||||||||||||||
Total loans |
343,974 | 306,549 | 283,387 | 269,703 | 245,383 | 217,690 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
169,192 | 149,802 | 137,243 | 107,162 | 95,351 | 87,124 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets |
527,070 | 482,572 | 432,691 | 386,823 | 347,671 | 312,227 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits |
439,964 | 402,603 | 356,030 | 314,302 | 277,592 | 243,545 | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
17,523 | 14,868 | 16,013 | 16,136 | 11,728 | 14,106 | ||||||||||||||||||
Advances from FHLB |
45,736 | 42,379 | 43,630 | 40,239 | 38,137 | 29,994 | ||||||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
10,310 | 10,310 | 655 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total stockholders equity |
35,542 | 35,705 | 33,935 | 32,542 | 32,944 | 32,675 | ||||||||||||||||||
Statement of operations data, for the
three months ended: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 6,225 | 5,666 | 5,244 | 4,702 | 4,369 | 3,946 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
1,689 | 1,514 | 1,351 | 1,317 | 1,385 | 1,310 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income |
4,536 | 4,152 | 3,893 | 3,385 | 2,984 | 2,636 | ||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
449 | 354 | 204 | 318 | 347 | 288 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income after
provision for loan losses |
4,087 | 3,798 | 3,689 | 3,067 | 2,637 | 2,348 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income |
1,183 | 1,225 | 924 | 1,024 | 877 | 462 | ||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest expense |
3,615 | 3,412 | 3,268 | 2,863 | 2,675 | 2,242 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income before taxes |
1,655 | 1,611 | 1,345 | 1,228 | 839 | 568 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
487 | 540 | 487 | 441 | 302 | 195 | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,168 | 1,071 | 858 | 787 | 537 | 373 | |||||||||||||||||
Per share data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings basic |
$ | 0.16 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.05 | |||||||||||||||||
Earnings diluted |
$ | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.05 | |||||||||||||||||
Book value at quarter end |
$ | 4.74 | 4.91 | 4.65 | 4.50 | 4.55 | 4.39 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted avg. shares basic |
7,397,920 | 7,384,106 | 7,384,106 | 7,384,106 | 7,384,106 | 7,384,106 | ||||||||||||||||||
Weighted avg. shares diluted |
8,279,114 | 8,213,730 | 8,114,888 | 7,944,654 | 7,761,284 | 7,683,262 | ||||||||||||||||||
Common shares outstanding |
7,404,586 | 7,384,106 | 7,384,106 | 7,384,106 | 7,384,106 | 7,384,106 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital ratios: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity to total assets |
6.0 | % | 6.7 | % | 6.8 | % | 7.5 | % | 10.9 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Leverage |
8.4 | % | 9.0 | % | 10.5 | % | 8.2 | % | 8.9 | % | 10.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier 1 risk-based |
10.2 | % | 11.2 | % | 11.8 | % | 9.6 | % | 10.6 | % | 12.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Total risk-based |
11.2 | % | 12.1 | % | 12.8 | % | 10.6 | % | 11.7 | % | 13.2 | % |
Page 26
Financial Condition
Our consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2004 reflects significant growth since December 31, 2003. Total assets grew to $586 million as of June 30, 2004 up 35 percent on an annualized basis from the $498 million reported at December 31, 2003 and up 45 percent from the $403 million reported at June 30, 2003. Loans as of June 30, 2004 were $355 million compared to $297 million at December 31, 2003 and $255 million at June 30, 2003. Total deposits increased to $467 million at June 30, 2004, compared to $391 million at December 31, 2003 and $309 million at June 30, 2003.
Net loan growth for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 was $32 million, compared to $26 million during the first quarter of 2003 and $26 million during the second quarter of 2003. Total deposit growth for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, was $29 million, compared to $46 million during the first quarter of 2003 and $42 million during the second quarter of 2003.
Loans. The composition of loans at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and the percentage (%) of each classification to total loans are summarized as follows (dollars in thousands):
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||
Amount |
% |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
Commercial real estate Mortgage |
$ | 89,309 | 25.1 | % | $ | 68,507 | 23.1 | % | ||||||||
Commercial real estate Construction |
8,428 | 2.4 | 8,211 | 2.8 | ||||||||||||
Commercial Other |
152,057 | 42.8 | 129,882 | 43.7 | ||||||||||||
Total commercial |
249,794 | 70.3 | 206,600 | 69.6 | ||||||||||||
Consumer real estate Mortgage |
90,197 | 25.4 | 76,042 | 25.6 | ||||||||||||
Consumer real estate Construction |
2,876 | 0.8 | 3,077 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
Consumer Other |
12,400 | 3.5 | 11,285 | 3.8 | ||||||||||||
Total consumer |
105,473 | 29.7 | 90,404 | 30.4 | ||||||||||||
Total loans |
$ | 355,267 | 100.0 | % | $ | 297,004 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
The following table classifies our fixed and variable rate loans at June 30, 2004 according to contractual maturities of (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, and (3) after five years along with percentage comparisons to December 31, 2003. The table also classifies our variable rate loans pursuant to the contractual repricing dates of the underlying loans (dollars in thousands):
Amounts at June 30, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Percentages to total loans | ||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed | Variable | at June 30, | at Dec. 31, | |||||||||||||||||
Rates |
Rates |
Total |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||||||
Based on contractual maturities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Due within one year |
$ | 6,114 | $ | 107,028 | $ | 113,142 | 31.8 | % | 31.7 | % | ||||||||||
Due in one year through five years |
84,071 | 58,392 | 142,463 | 40.1 | 44.0 | |||||||||||||||
Due after five years |
21,304 | 78,358 | 99,662 | 28.1 | 24.3 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 111,489 | $ | 243,778 | $ | 355,267 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Based on contractual repricing dates: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Daily floating rate |
$ | | $ | 186,185 | $ | 186,185 | 52.4 | % | 52.7 | % | ||||||||||
Reprice within one year |
6,114 | 23,214 | 29,328 | 8.3 | 8.6 | |||||||||||||||
Reprice in one year through five years |
84,071 | 32,975 | 117,046 | 32.9 | 35.2 | |||||||||||||||
Reprice after five years |
21,304 | 1,404 | 22,708 | 6.4 | 3.5 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 111,489 | $ | 243,778 | $ | 355,267 | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
The above information does not consider the impact of scheduled principal payments. Daily floating rate loans are tied to Pinnacle Nationals prime lending rate or a national interest rate index with the underlying loan rates changing in relation to changes in these indexes.
Non-Performing Assets. The specific economic and credit risks associated with our loan portfolio, include, but are not limited to, a general downturn in the economy which could affect employment rates in our market area, general real estate market deterioration, interest rate fluctuations, deteriorated or non-existent collateral, title defects, inaccurate appraisals, financial deterioration of borrowers, fraud, and any violation of banking laws and regulations.
Page 27
We attempt to reduce these economic and credit risks by adherence to loan to value guidelines for collateralized loans, by investigating the creditworthiness of the borrower and by monitoring the borrowers financial position. Also, we establish and periodically review our lending policies and procedures. Banking regulations limit our exposure by prohibiting loan relationships that exceed 15% of Pinnacle Nationals statutory capital in the case of loans that are not fully secured by readily marketable or other permissible types of collateral.
We discontinue the accrual of interest income when (1) there is a significant deterioration in the financial condition of the borrower and full repayment of principal and interest is not expected or (2) the principal or interest is more than 90 days past due, unless the loan is both well-secured and in the process of collection. At June 30, 2004, we had a loan for $1,339,000 on nonaccrual compared to $379,000 at December 31, 2003. An estimate of the loss related to these nonaccrual loans has been incorporated into our ALL methodology.
There were approximately $35,000 in other loans at June 30, 2004 which were 90 days past due and still accruing interest. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, no loans were deemed to be a restructured loan. Additionally, we had no repossessed real estate properties classified as Other Real Estate Owned at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. The following table is a summary of our nonperforming assets at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands):
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Nonaccrual loans (1) |
$ | 1,339 | $ | 379 | ||||
Restructured loans |
| | ||||||
Other real estate owned |
| | ||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
1,339 | 379 | ||||||
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
35 | 182 | ||||||
Total nonperforming assets and accruing loans past due 90 days or more |
$ | 1,374 | $ | 561 | ||||
Total loans outstanding |
$ | 355,267 | $ | 297,004 | ||||
Ratio of total nonperforming
assets and accruing loans past
due 90 days or more to total
loans outstanding at end of
period |
0.39 | % | 0.19 | % | ||||
Ratio of total nonperforming
assets and accruing loans past
due 90 days or more to total
allowance for loan losses at end
of period |
30.77 | % | 15.08 | % | ||||
(1) | Interest income that would have been recorded during the six months of 2004 related to nonaccrual loans was $7,000 compared to $50,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003, none of which is included in interest income or net income for the applicable periods. |
Potential problem assets, which are not included in nonperforming assets, amounted to $392,000 at June 30, 2004 or 0.11% of total loans compared to $1,687,000 or 0.57% of total loans at December 31, 2003. Potential problem assets represent those assets with a well-defined weakness and where information about possible credit problems of borrowers has caused management to have serious doubts about the borrowers ability to comply with present repayment terms. This definition is believed to be substantially consistent with the standards established by Pinnacle Nationals primary regulator for loans classified as substandard.
Allowance for Loan Losses (ALL). We maintain the ALL at a level that our management deems appropriate to adequately cover the inherent risks in the loan portfolio. As of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, our allowance for loan losses was $4,466,000 and $3,719,000, respectively. Our management deemed these amounts to be adequate. The judgments and estimates associated with our ALL determination are described under Critical Accounting Estimates above.
Approximately 70% of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 consisted of commercial loans. Using standard industry codes, we periodically analyze our loan position with respect to our borrowers industries to determine if a concentration of credit risk exists to any one or more industries. We do have a significant credit exposure of loans outstanding plus unfunded lines and letters of credit to borrowers in the trucking industry and to operators of nonresidential buildings at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. Credit exposure to the trucking industry approximated $39.3 million at June 30, 2004 and $35.0 million at December 31, 2003. Credit exposure to operators of nonresidential buildings approximated $23.5 million at June 30, 2004 and $16.6 million at December 31, 2003. We evaluate our exposure level to these industry groups periodically
Page 28
in order to determine if additional allowance allocations are warranted. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we determined that we did not have any excessive exposure to any single industry which would warrant additional allowance allocations.
The following table sets forth, based on managements best estimate, the allocation of the ALL to types of loans as well as the unallocated portion as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and the percentage (%) of loans in each category to the total loans (dollars in thousands):
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||
Amount |
% |
Amount |
% |
|||||||||||||
Commercial |
$ | 2,875 | 70.3 | % | $ | 2,329 | 69.6 | % | ||||||||
Consumer |
723 | 29.7 | 670 | 30.4 | ||||||||||||
Unallocated |
868 | na | 720 | na | ||||||||||||
$ | 4,466 | 100.0 | % | $ | 3,719 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
The following is a summary of changes in the allowance for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and for the year ended December 31, 2003 and the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to total loans as of the end of each period (dollars in thousands):
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 3,719 | $ | 2,677 | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
802 | 1,157 | ||||||
Charged-off loans |
(65 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||
Recoveries of previously charged-off loans |
10 | 52 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 4,466 | $ | 3,719 | ||||
Ratio of the
allowance for loan losses
to total loans outstanding
at end of period |
1.26 | % | 1.28 | % | ||||
Ratio of net
charge-offs to average
loans outstanding for the
period (1) |
0.03 | % | 0.05 | % | ||||
(1) | The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was computing by annualizing the net charge-off amount to a twelve-month period. |
During the first six months of 2004, we charged-off $65,000 related to several consumer loans. As a relatively new institution, we do not have loss experience comparable to more mature financial institutions; however, as our loan portfolio matures, we will have additional charge-offs and we will consider the amount and nature of our charge-offs in determining the adequacy of our allowance for loan losses.
Investments. The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of our securities at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands):
June 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
Value |
|||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agency securities |
$ | 18,800 | $ | | $ | (288 | ) | $ | 18,512 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
117,180 | 158 | (2,252 | ) | 115,086 | |||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
2,161 | 2 | (106 | ) | 2,057 | |||||||||||
Corporate notes |
2,322 | | (85 | ) | 2,237 | |||||||||||
$ | 140,463 | $ | 160 | $ | (2,731 | ) | $ | 137,892 | ||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agency securities |
$ | 17,746 | $ | | $ | (806 | ) | $ | 16,940 | |||||||
State and municipal securities |
9,890 | | (504 | ) | 9,386 | |||||||||||
$ | 27,636 | $ | | $ | (1,310 | ) | $ | 26,326 | ||||||||
Page 29
December 31, 2003 (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Fair | |||||||||||||
Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
Value |
|||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. government and agency securities |
$ | 27,023 | $ | 353 | $ | (104 | ) | $ | 27,272 | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
103,088 | 507 | (617 | ) | 102,978 | |||||||||||
State and municipal securities |
9,590 | 143 | (39 | ) | 9,694 | |||||||||||
$ | 139,701 | $ | 1,003 | $ | (760 | ) | $ | 139,944 | ||||||||
(1) | At December 31, 2003, Pinnacle National had no securities classified as held-to-maturity. |
On March 31, 2004, Pinnacle National transferred $27.7 million of available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity at fair value. The transfer consisted of substantially all of Pinnacle Nationals holdings of Tennessee municipal securities and several of its longer-term agency securities. These securities were selected for the held-to-maturity classification because we have the ability and intent to hold such securities until their maturity. The unrealized gain on such securities as of the date of transfer was $325,000. This amount is reflected in the accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, and will be amortized over the remaining lives of the respective held-to-maturity securities.
Pinnacle Financial realized approximately $248,000 in net gains from the sale of $21,877,000 of available-for-sale securities during the six months ended June 30, 2004, of which none were realized in the second quarter of 2004, and $134,000 in net gains on the sale of $18,945,000 of available-for-sale securities during the six months ended June 30, 2003 of which $116,000 were realized in the second quarter of 2003. Gross realized gains amounted to $312,000 on the sale of $10.9 million of available-for-sale securities while gross realized losses amounted to $64,000 on the sale of $11.0 million of available-for-sale securities during the six months ended June 30, 2004. During the six months ended June 30, 2003, gross realized gains amounted to $148,000 on the sale of $16,929,000 of available-for-sale securities while gross realized losses amounted to $14,000 on the sale of $2,017,000 of available-for-sale securities. At June 30, 2004, approximately $104,635,000 of Pinnacle Financials portfolio was pledged to secure public fund deposits and securities sold under agreements to repurchase.
The following table shows the carrying value of investment securities according to contractual maturity classifications of (1) one year or less, (2) after one year through five years, (3) after five years through ten years, and (4) after ten years. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities of mortgage-backed securities because the mortgages underlying the securities may be called or prepaid with or without penalty. Therefore, these securities are not included in the maturity categories noted below as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands):
June 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government | State and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and agency | municipal | Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
securities |
securities |
securities |
Totals |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount |
Yield |
Amount |
Yield |
Amount |
Yield |
Amount |
Yield |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | ||||||||||||||||
Due in one year to five years |
2,940 | 3.5 | % | | | 2,237 | 3.4 | % | 5,179 | 3.4 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Due in five years to ten years |
15,572 | 4.6 | % | 488 | 5.5 | % | | | 16,060 | 4.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
| | 1,569 | 5.8 | % | | | 1,569 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 18,512 | 4.4 | % | $ | 2,057 | 5.7 | % | $ | 2,237 | 3.4 | % | $ | 22,806 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Securities held-to-maturity: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | ||||||||||||||||
Due in one year to five years |
| | 703 | 4.3 | % | | | 703 | 4.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in five years to ten years |
17,746 | 4.3 | % | 7,324 | 4.9 | % | | | 25,070 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
| | 1,863 | 5.3 | % | | | 1,863 | 5.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 17,746 | 4.3 | % | $ | 9,890 | 5.0 | % | $ | | | % | $ | 27,636 | 4.5 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Page 30
December 31, 2003 (1) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government | State and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and agency | municipal | Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
securities |
securities |
securities |
Totals |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount |
Yield |
Amount |
Yield |
Amount |
Yield |
Amount |
Yield |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | $ | | | % | ||||||||||||||||
Due in one year to five years |
4,036 | 4.0 | % | 2,005 | 4.8 | % | | | 6,041 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Due in five years to ten years |
23,236 | 4.4 | % | 7,221 | 5.0 | % | | | 30,457 | 4.6 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Due after ten years |
| | 468 | 5.2 | % | | | % | 468 | 5.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 27,272 | 4.3 | % | $ | 9,694 | 4.9 | % | $ | | | % | $ | 36,966 | 4.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
(1) | At December 31, 2003, Pinnacle National had no securities classified as held-to-maturity. We computed yields using coupon interest, adding discount accretion or subtracting premium amortization, as appropriate, on a ratable basis over the life of each security. We computed the weighted average yield for each maturity range using the acquisition price of each security in that range. |
At June 30, 2004, the fair value of our mortgage-backed securities portfolio approximated $115.1 million compared to $103.0 million at December 31, 2003. All of these securities were included in our securities available-for-sale portfolio. A statistical comparison of our mortgage-backed portfolio at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 follows:
June 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
Weighted average life |
3.92 years | 4.75 years | ||||||
Weighted average coupon |
5.27 | % | 5.24 | % | ||||
Tax equivalent yield |
4.23 | % | 4.44 | % | ||||
Modified duration (*) |
3.32 | % | 3.95 | % |
(*) | Modified duration represents an approximation of the change in value of a security for every 100 basis point increase or decrease in market interest rates. |
Deposits and Other Borrowings. We had approximately $467 million of deposits at June 30, 2004 compared to $391 million at December 31, 2003. Our deposits consist of noninterest and interest-bearing demand accounts, savings, money market and time deposits. Additionally, we entered into agreements with certain customers to sell certain of our securities under agreements to repurchase the security the following day. These agreements (which provide customers with short-term returns for their excess funds) amounted to $23.8 million at June 30, 2004 compared to $15.1 million at December 31, 2003. Additionally, at June 30, 2004, we had borrowed $47.5 million in advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati compared to $44.5 million at December 31, 2003.
Generally, banks classify their funding base as either core funding or non-core funding. Core funding consists of all deposits other than time deposits issued in denominations of $100,000 or greater while all other funding is deemed to be non-core. The following table represents the balances of our deposits and other fundings and the percentage of each type to the total at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 (dollars in thousands):
June 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||
Amount |
Percentage |
Amount |
Percentage |
|||||||||||||
Core funding: |
||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits |
$ | 82,491 | 15.0 | % | $ | 60,796 | 13.2 | % | ||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits |
35,845 | 6.5 | 31,407 | 6.8 | ||||||||||||
Savings and money market deposits |
162,335 | 29.6 | 140,384 | 30.5 | ||||||||||||
Time deposits less than $100,000 |
47,563 | 8.7 | 43,996 | 9.6 | ||||||||||||
Total core funding |
328,234 | 59.8 | 276,583 | 60.1 | ||||||||||||
Non-core funding: |
||||||||||||||||
Time deposits greater than $100,000 |
||||||||||||||||
Public funds |
39,764 | 7.2 | 26,812 | 5.8 | ||||||||||||
Brokered deposits |
41,328 | 7.5 | 39,364 | 8.5 | ||||||||||||
Other time deposits greater than $100,000 |
57,995 | 10.6 | 47,810 | 10.4 | ||||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase |
23,773 | 4.3 | 15,050 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
47,500 | 8.7 | 44,500 | 9.7 | ||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
10,310 | 1.9 | 10,310 | 2.2 | ||||||||||||
Total non-core funding |
220,670 | 40.2 | 183,846 | 39.9 | ||||||||||||
$ | 548,904 | 100.0 | % | $ | 460,429 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Page 31
The amount of time deposits issued in amounts of $100,000 or more as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 amounted to $139 million and $114.0 million, respectively. The following table shows our time deposits over $100,000 by category at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, based on time remaining until maturity of (1) three months or less, (2) over three but less than six months, (3) over six but less than twelve months and (4) over twelve months (dollars in thousands):
June 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
Three months or less |
$ | 44,918 | $ | 32,054 | ||||
Over three but less than six months |
37,274 | 28,109 | ||||||
Over six but less than twelve months |
16,543 | 28,502 | ||||||
Over twelve months |
40,352 | 25,321 | ||||||
$ | 139,087 | $ | 113,986 | |||||
Subordinated debt. On December 29, 2003, we established PNFP Statutory Trust I (Trust), a wholly-owned statutory business trust. Pinnacle Financial is the sole sponsor of the trust and owns $310,000 of the Trusts common securities. The Trust was created for the exclusive purpose of issuing 30-year capital trust preferred securities (Trust Preferred Securities) in the aggregate amount of $10,000,000 and using the proceeds from the issuance of the common and preferred securities to purchase $10,310,000 of junior subordinated debentures (Subordinated Debentures) issued by Pinnacle Financial. The sole assets of the Trust are the Subordinated Debentures. Pinnacle Financials $310,000 investment in the Trust is included in other assets and the $10,310,000 obligation of Pinnacle Financial is included in subordinated debt.
The Trust Preferred Securities bear a floating interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR which is set each quarter and matures on December 30, 2033. Distributions are payable quarterly. The Trust Preferred Securities are subject to mandatory redemption upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures at their stated maturity date or their earlier redemption in an amount equal to their liquidation amount plus accumulated and unpaid distributions to the date of redemption. Pinnacle Financial guarantees the payment of distributions and payments for redemption or liquidation of the Trust Preferred Securities to the extent of funds held by the Trust. Pinnacle Financials obligations under the Subordinated Debentures together with the guarantee and other back-up obligations, in the aggregate, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by Pinnacle Financial of the obligations of the Trust under the Trust Preferred Securities.
The Subordinated Debentures are unsecured, bear an interest rate based on a spread over 3-month LIBOR (equal to the spread paid by the Trust on the Trust Preferred Securities) which is set each quarter and matures on December 30, 2033. Interest is payable quarterly. Pinnacle Financial may defer the payment of interest at any time for a period not exceeding 20 consecutive quarters provided that deferral period does not extend past the stated maturity. During any such deferral period, distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities will also be deferred and Pinnacle Financials ability to pay dividends on our common shares will be restricted.
Subject to approval by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, the Trust Preferred Securities may be redeemed prior to maturity at our option on or after September 17, 2008. The Trust Preferred Securities may also be redeemed at any time in whole (but not in part) in the event of unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that result in (1) the Trust becoming subject to federal income tax on income received on the Subordinated Debentures, (2) interest payable by the parent company on the Subordinated Debentures becoming non-deductible for federal tax purposes, (3) the requirement for the Trust to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or (4) loss of the ability to treat the Trust Preferred Securities as Tier I capital under the Federal Reserve capital adequacy guidelines.
The Trust Preferred Securities qualify as Tier I capital under current regulatory interpretations. However, banking regulators are currently reviewing such treatment, the outcome of which is not known. Should the banking regulators determine that treatment of trust preferred securities shall not be treated as Tier 1 capital, such determination would have an impact on Pinnacle Financial; however Pinnacle Financials capital structure, at the present time and based on our current growth projections, is such that utilization of the Trust Preferred Securities as Tier II capital is more critical to Pinnacle Financial than the Trust Preferred Securities maintaining their present Tier I capital treatment. To our knowledge, there has been no serious consideration given by banking regulators to disqualify trust preferred securities as Tier II capital.
Page 32
Capital Resources. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, our stockholders equity amounted to $35.1 million and $34.3 million, respectively. The change in stockholders equity between December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2004 was attributable to our net income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 of $2,239,000 and the net decrease in comprehensive income of $1,551,000 attributable to the increase in fair value of our available-for-sale securities portfolio.
Generally, banking laws and regulations require banks and bank holding companies to maintain certain minimum capital ratios in order to engage in certain activities or be eligible for certain types of regulatory relief. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, our capital ratios, including Pinnacle Nationals capital ratios, met regulatory minimum capital requirements. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, Pinnacle National was categorized as well-capitalized. To be categorized as well-capitalized, Pinnacle National must maintain minimum Total risk-based, Tier I risk-based, and Tier I leverage ratios as set forth in the following table. Additionally, Pinnacle Financial and Pinnacle National must maintain certain minimum capital ratios for regulatory purposes. The following table presents actual, minimum and well-capitalized capital amounts and ratios at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003:
Minimum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
To Be Well-Capitalized | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum | Under Prompt | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital | Corrective | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Actual |
Requirement |
Action Provisions |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
Ratio |
Amount |
Ratio |
|||||||||||||||||||
At June 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 51,312 | 11.2 | % | $ | 36,613 | 8.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 49,272 | 10.8 | % | $ | 36,575 | 8.0 | % | $ | 45,719 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 46,836 | 10.2 | % | $ | 18,306 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 44,676 | 9.8 | % | $ | 18,287 | 4.0 | % | $ | 27,431 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 46,836 | 8.4 | % | $ | 22,209 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 44,676 | 8.1 | % | $ | 22,190 | 4.0 | % | $ | 27,737 | 5.0 | % | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 47,914 | 12.8 | % | $ | 29,981 | 8.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 38,617 | 10.3 | % | $ | 29,944 | 8.0 | % | $ | 37,430 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to risk weighted assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 44,185 | 11.8 | % | $ | 14,990 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 34,888 | 9.3 | % | $ | 14,972 | 4.0 | % | $ | 22,458 | 6.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Tier I capital to average assets (*): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pinnacle Financial |
$ | 44,185 | 9.7 | % | $ | 18,188 | 4.0 | % | not applicable | |||||||||||||||
Pinnacle National |
$ | 34,888 | 7.7 | % | $ | 18,188 | 4.0 | % | $ | 22,735 | 5.0 | % |
(*) | Average assets for the above calculations were as of the most recent quarter for each period noted. |
In connection with approving Pinnacle Financials issuance of Trust Preferred Securities, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (FRB-Atlanta) required Pinnacle Financial to maintain a Total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 10%, a Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 6% and a Tier 1 capital to average-assets ratio of 5% during the period ended December 31, 2004. In connection with such approval, Pinnacle Financials President and Chief Executive Officer, Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer committed to the FRB-Atlanta that if required to enable Pinnacle Financial to make interest payments in 2004 on its Subordinated Debentures under certain circumstances, they would exercise up to 185,000 warrants to acquire Pinnacle Financial common stock held by them to provide funds for such payment.
Dividends. Pinnacle National is subject to restrictions on the payment of dividends to Pinnacle Financial under federal banking laws and the regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, or the OCC. We, in turn, are also subject to limits on payment of dividends to our shareholders by the rules, regulations and policies of federal banking authorities. We have not paid any dividends to date, nor do we anticipate paying dividends to our shareholders for the foreseeable future. Future dividend policy will depend on Pinnacle Nationals earnings, capital position, financial condition and other factors.
Page 33
Return on Assets and Stockholders Equity. The following table shows return on average assets (net income divided by average total assets), return on average equity (net income divided by average stockholders equity), dividend payout ratio (dividends declared per share divided by net income per share) and stockholders equity to asset ratio (average stockholders equity divided by average total assets) for the six month period ended June 30, 2004 compared to the year ended December 31, 2003.
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Return on average assets |
0.84 | % | 0.66 | % | ||||
Return on average equity |
12.57 | % | 7.70 | % | ||||
Dividend payout ratio |
| % | | % | ||||
Average equity to average assets ratio |
6.70 | % | 8.54 | % |
(1) | The return on average assets and return on average equity for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was computed by annualizing the numerator to a twelve-month period. |
Market and Liquidity Risk Management
Our objective is to manage assets and liabilities to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and capital policies. Our Asset Liability Management Committee (ALCO) is charged with the responsibility of monitoring these policies, which are designed to ensure acceptable composition of asset/liability mix. Two critical areas of focus for ALCO are interest rate sensitivity and liquidity risk management.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. In the normal course of business, we are exposed to market risk arising from fluctuations in interest rates. ALCO measures and evaluates the interest rate risk so that we can meet customer demands for various types of loans and deposits. ALCO determines the most appropriate amounts of on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet items. Measurements which we use to help us manage interest rate sensitivity include an earnings simulation model, an economic value of equity model, and gap analysis computations. These measurements are used in conjunction with competitive pricing analysis.
Earnings simulation model. We believe that interest rate risk is best measured by our earnings simulation modeling. Forecasted levels of earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities, and off-balance sheet financial instruments are combined with ALCO forecasts of interest rates for the next 12 months and are combined with other factors in order to produce various earnings simulations. To limit interest rate risk, we have guidelines for our earnings at risk which seek to limit the variance of net income to less than 10 percent for a 200 basis point change up or down in rates from managements most likely interest rate forecast over the next twelve months. The results of our current simulation model would indicate that our net interest income should increase with a gradual rise in interest rates over the next twelve months and decrease should interest rates fall over the same period.
Economic value of equity. Our economic value of equity model measures the extent that estimated economic values of our assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items will change as a result of interest rate changes. Economic values are determined by discounting expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet items, which establishes a base case economic value of equity. To help limit interest rate risk, we have a guideline stating that for an instantaneous 200 basis point change in interest rates up or down, the economic value of equity will not change by more than 20 percent from the base case.
Gap analysis. An asset or liability is considered to be interest rate-sensitive if it will reprice or mature within the time period analyzed; for example, within three months or one year. The interest rate-sensitivity gap is the difference between the interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities scheduled to mature or reprice within such time period. A gap is considered positive when the amount of interest rate-sensitive assets exceeds the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities. A gap is considered negative when the amount of interest rate-sensitive liabilities exceeds the interest rate-sensitive assets. During a period of rising interest rates, a negative gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to result in an increase in net interest income. Conversely, during a period of falling interest rates, a negative gap would tend to result in an increase
Page 34
in net interest income, while a positive gap would tend to adversely affect net interest income. If our assets and liabilities were equally flexible and moved concurrently, the impact of any increase or decrease in interest rates on net interest income would be minimal. To assist us in managing our interest rate sensitivity, we have established a cumulative twelve-month interest rate-sensitivity gap ratio of earning assets to interest bearing liabilities of 75% to 125% in this time horizon.
Each of the above analyses may not, on their own, be an accurate indicator of how our net interest income will be affected by changes in interest rates. Income associated with interest-earning assets and costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities may not be affected uniformly by changes in interest rates. In addition, the magnitude and duration of changes in interest rates may have a significant impact on net interest income. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities fluctuate in advance of changes in general market rates, while interest rates on other types may lag behind changes in general market rates. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable rate mortgage loans, have features (generally referred to as interest rate caps and floors) which limit changes in interest rates. Prepayment and early withdrawal levels also could deviate significantly from those assumed in calculating the maturity of certain instruments. The ability of many borrowers to service their debts also may decrease during periods of rising interest rates. ALCO reviews each of the above interest rate sensitivity analyses along with several different interest rate scenarios as part of its responsibility to provide a satisfactory, consistent level of profitability within the framework of established liquidity, loan, investment, borrowing, and capital policies.
We may also use derivative financial instruments to improve the balance between interest-sensitive assets and interest-sensitive liabilities and as one tool to manage our interest rate sensitivity while continuing to meet the credit and deposit needs of our customers. At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, we had not entered into any derivative contracts to assist managing our interest rate sensitivity.
Liquidity Risk Management. The purpose of liquidity risk management is to ensure that there are sufficient cash flows to satisfy loan demand, deposit withdrawals, and our other needs. Traditional sources of liquidity for a bank include asset maturities and growth in core deposits. A bank may achieve its desired liquidity objectives from the management of its assets and liabilities and by internally generated funding through its operations. Funds invested in marketable instruments that can be readily sold and the continuous maturing of other earning assets are sources of liquidity from an asset perspective. The liability base provides sources of liquidity through attraction of increased deposits and borrowing funds from various other institutions.
Changes in interest rates also affect our liquidity position. We currently price deposits in response to market rates and our management intends to continue this policy. If deposits are not priced in response to market rates, a loss of deposits could occur which would negatively affect our liquidity position.
Scheduled loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, but loan payoffs and deposit flows fluctuate significantly, being influenced by interest rates, general economic conditions and competition. Additionally, debt security investments are subject to prepayment and call provisions that could accelerate their payoff prior to stated maturity. We attempt to price our deposit products to meet our asset/liability objectives consistent with local market conditions. Our ALCO is responsible for monitoring our ongoing liquidity needs. Our regulators also monitor our liquidity and capital resources on a periodic basis.
In addition, Pinnacle National is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati. As a result, Pinnacle National receives advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati, pursuant to the terms of various borrowing agreements, which assist it in the funding of its home mortgage and commercial real estate loan portfolios. Pinnacle National has pledged under the borrowing agreements with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati certain qualifying residential mortgage loans and, pursuant to a blanket lien, all qualifying commercial mortgage loans as collateral. At June 30, 2004, Pinnacle National had received advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati totaling $47.5 million at the following rates and maturities (dollars in thousands):
Page 35
Amount |
Interest Rate |
|||||||
July 28, 2004 |
$ | 2,000 | 1.90 | |||||
July 30, 2004 |
4,000 | 2.94 | ||||||
September 15, 2004 |
5,000 | 1.25 | ||||||
January 28, 2005 |
2,000 | 2.18 | ||||||
October 14, 2005 |
3,000 | 3.10 | ||||||
December 30, 2005 |
3,000 | 2.40 | ||||||
January 27, 2006 |
2,000 | 2.79 | ||||||
March 12, 2006 |
3,000 | 1.97 | ||||||
March 31, 2006 |
4,000 | 2.10 | ||||||
April 17, 2006 |
2,000 | 2.64 | ||||||
April 28, 2006 |
1,500 | 2.52 | ||||||
May 19, 2006 |
10,000 | 1.26 | ||||||
September 30, 2006 |
4,000 | 2.39 | ||||||
January 26, 2007 |
2,000 | 3.24 | ||||||
$ | 47,500 | |||||||
Weighted average interest rate |
2.11 | % | ||||||
At June 30, 2004, brokered certificates of deposit approximated $41.3 million which represented 7.5% of total fundings compared to $39.4 million and 8.5% at December 31, 2003. We issue these brokered certificates through several different brokerage houses based on competitive bid. Typically, these funds are for varying maturities from six months to two years and are issued at rates which are competitive to rates we would be required to pay to attract similar deposits from the local market as well as rates for Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati advances of similar maturities. We consider these deposits to be a ready source of liquidity under current market conditions.
At June 30, 2004, we had no significant commitments for capital expenditures. However, we are in the process of developing our branch network in Davidson, Williamson and surrounding counties. As a result, we anticipate that we will enter into contracts to buy property or construct branch facilities and/or lease agreements to lease property and/or rent currently constructed facilities in Davidson, Williamson and surrounding counties.
The following table presents additional information about our contractual obligations as of June 30, 2004, which by their terms have contractual maturity and termination dates subsequent to June 30, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
Next 12 | 13-36 | 37-60 | More than | |||||||||||||||||
Months |
Months |
Months |
60 Months |
Totals |
||||||||||||||||
Contractual obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Certificates of deposit |
$ | 128,891 | $ | 50,463 | $ | 7,296 | $ | | $ | 186,650 | ||||||||||
Securities sold under agreements to
repurchase |
23,773 | | | | 23,773 | |||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank advances |
13,000 | 34,500 | | | 47,500 | |||||||||||||||
Subordinated debt |
| | | 10,310 | 10,310 | |||||||||||||||
Minimum operating lease commitments |
564 | 1,218 | 1,289 | 1,864 | 4,935 | |||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 166,228 | $ | 86,181 | $ | 8,585 | $ | 12,174 | $ | 273,168 | ||||||||||
Our management believes that we have adequate liquidity to meet all known contractual obligations and unfunded commitments, including loan commitments and reasonable borrower, depositor, and creditor requirements over the next twelve months.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. At June 30, 2004, we had outstanding standby letters of credit of $42.5 million and unfunded loan commitments outstanding of $119.4 million. Because these commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and many will expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment level does not necessarily represent future cash requirements. If needed to fund these outstanding commitments, Pinnacle National has the ability to liquidate Federal funds sold or securities available-for-sale, or on a short-term basis to borrow and purchase Federal funds from other financial institutions. At June 30, 2004, Pinnacle National had accommodations with upstream correspondent banks for unsecured short-term advances. These accommodations have various covenants related to their term and availability, and in most cases must be repaid within less than a month. The following table presents additional information about our unfunded commitments
Page 36
as of June 30, 2004, which by their terms have contractual maturity dates subsequent to June 30, 2004 (dollars in thousands):
Next 12 | 13-36 | 37-60 | More than | |||||||||||||||||
Months |
Months |
Months |
60 Months |
Totals |
||||||||||||||||
Unfunded commitments: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Letters of credit |
$ | 35,982 | $ | 3,907 | $ | 2,629 | $ | | $ | 42,518 | ||||||||||
Lines of credit |
86,123 | 8,045 | 2,460 | 22,803 | 119,431 | |||||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 122,105 | $ | 11,952 | $ | 5,089 | $ | 22,803 | $ | 161,949 | ||||||||||
Impact of Inflation
The consolidated financial statements and related consolidated financial data presented herein have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and practices within the banking industry which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates have a more significant impact on a financial institutions performance than the effects of general levels of inflation.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2004, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments. Current accounting guidance requires the commitment to originate mortgage loans to be held for sale be recognized on the balance sheet at fair value from inception through expiration or funding. SAB 105 requires that the fair-value measurement include only differences between the guaranteed interest rate in the loan commitment and a market interest rate, excluding any expected future cash flows related to the customer relationship or loan servicing. SAB 105 is effective for commitments to originate mortgage loans to be held for sale that are entered into after March 31, 2004. Its adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial position on results of operations of Pinnacle Financial.
In March 2004, the FASBs Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 03-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. The guidance prescribes a three-step model for determining whether an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired and requires disclosures about unrealized losses on investments. The accounting guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2004, while the disclosure requirements are effective for annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2004. Its adoption did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial position on results of operations of Pinnacle Financial.
Other Accounting Developments
In March 2004, the FASB issued an exposure document entitled Share-Based Payment an amendment of Statements No. 123 and 95 (Proposed Statement of Financial Accounting Standards). The proposed Statement would eliminate the ability to account for share-based compensation transactions using APB Opinion No. 25 and generally require instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. This accounting, if approved, will result in additional compensation expense charges to our future results of operations. The proposed Statement, if adopted, would be applied to public entities prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2004, as if all share-based compensation awards granted, modified, or settled after December 15, 1994, had been accounted for using the fair-value method of accounting. Retrospective application of the proposed Statement is not permitted.
Page 37
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
The information required by this Item 3 is included on pages 32 through 35 of Item 2 Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures | ||||
Pinnacle Financial maintains disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by it in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to Pinnacle Financials management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Pinnacle Financial carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that Pinnacle Financials disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | ||||
Changes in Internal Controls | ||||
There were no changes in Pinnacle Financials internal control over financial reporting during Pinnacle Financials fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Pinnacle Financials internal control over financial reporting. |
Page 38
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or of which any of their property is the subject. |
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
(a) | Not applicable | |||
(b) | Not applicable | |||
(c) | Not applicable | |||
(d) | Not applicable | |||
(e) | None |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable |
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
(a) | The annual meeting of the shareholders of the Company was held on April 20, 2004. | |||
(b) | The following directors were elected at the meeting to serve until the annual meeting of shareholders in the year 2007 (*): |
Votes | Votes | Broker | ||||||||||
For |
Withheld |
Non-votes |
||||||||||
Sue R. Atkinson |
3,437,687 | 1,660 | | |||||||||
Colleen Conway-Welch |
3,435,347 | 4,000 | | |||||||||
Gregory L. Burns |
3,437,847 | 1,500 | | |||||||||
Clay T. Jackson |
3,435,847 | 3,500 | |
In addition, the following directors continue in office until the annual meeting of shareholders in the year indicated: |
John E. Maupin Jr.
|
2005 | Linda E. Rebrovick | 2005 | |||||||
Robert A. McCabe, Jr.
|
2005 | Robert E. McNeilly, Jr. | 2005 | |||||||
Dale W. Polley
|
2006 | M. Terry Turner | 2006 | |||||||
James L. Shaub, II
|
2006 | Reese L. Smith, III | 2006 |
(c) | Other matters voted upon and the results of the voting were as follows (*): | |||
At the annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholders of Pinnacle Financial approved an increase in the number of authorized shares of capital stock from 20,000,000 shares to 30,000,000 shares. With the increase, the number of authorized shares of common stock was increased from 10,000,000 shares to 20,000,000 shares and the number of authorized shares of preferred stock remained at 10,000,000 shares. The shareholders voted 3,365,202 in the affirmative and 71,245 against the proposal with 2,900 abstentions. | ||||
At the annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholders also approved the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan which would set aside for issuance up to 264,755 shares of Pinnacle |
Page 39
Financial common stock. This includes a new allocation of 250,000 shares plus 14,755 shares from the previous stock option plan. The shareholders voted 1,806,448 in the affirmative and 269,335 against the proposal with 5,300 abstentions and 1,358,264 broker non-votes. | ||||
The shareholders voted 3,433,637 in the affirmative and 1,660 votes in the negative, with 4,050 abstentions, to ratify the appointment of KPMG, LLP as auditors of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004. |
(*) | For this Item 4, vote totals do not reflect Pinnacle Financials two-for-one stock split which occurred after the April 20, 2004 annual meeting of shareholders. |
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None |
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) | Exhibits |
31.1
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) | |
31.2
|
Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) | |
32.1
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2
|
Certification pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350 Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K | |||
A current report on Form 8-K dated April 20, 2004, was furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission under Item 7. Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits, Item 9 Regulation FD Disclosure and Item 12 Results of Operations and Financial Condition of such form, and was furnished to disclose the press release issued by the Company on April 19, 2004 announcing the Companys results for the three months ended March 31, 2004. | ||||
A current report on Form 8-K dated April 20, 2004, was furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission under Item 7. Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits, and Item 9 Regulation FD Disclosure of such form, and was furnished to announce a two-for-one stock split. The stock split was in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend, with the new shares distributed on May 10, 2004, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on April 30, 2004. |
Page 40
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PINNACLE FINANCIAL PARTNERS, INC. | ||
By: /s/ M. Terry Turner
|
||
M. Terry Turner | ||
President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
Date: August 6, 2004 | ||
By: /s/ Harold R. Carpenter | ||
Harold R. Carpenter | ||
Chief Financial Officer | ||
Date: August 6, 2004 |
Page 41