UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended: June 30, 2004

OR

For the transition period from __________ to __________.

American HomePatient, Inc.

(615) 221-8884

None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [  ] No [X]

16,461,689

1

AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION FROM JULY 31, 2002 TO JULY 1, 2003)

INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Continued)

3

AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION FROM JULY 31, 2002 TO JULY 1, 2003)

INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited)

The accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

4

AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION FROM JULY 31, 2002 TO JULY 1, 2003)

INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

The accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

5

AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION FROM JULY 31, 2002 TO JULY 1, 2003)

INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Continued)

6

AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION FROM JULY 31, 2002 TO JULY 1, 2003)

INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)

The accompanying notes to interim condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

7

AMERICAN HOMEPATIENT, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION FROM JULY 31, 2002 TO JULY 1, 2003)

NOTES TO INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

American HomePatient, Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in September 1991. American HomePatient Inc.’s principal executive offices are located at 5200 Maryland Way, Suite 400, Brentwood, Tennessee 37027-5018, and its telephone number at that address is (615) 221-8884. American HomePatient, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) provides home health care services and products consisting primarily of respiratory therapies, infusion therapies and the rental and sale of home medical equipment and home health care supplies. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, these services represented 71%, 12% and 17% of revenues, respectively. These services and products are paid for primarily by Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payors. As of June 30, 2004, the Company provided these services to patients primarily in the home through 283 centers in 35 states: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia and Wisconsin.

The interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 herein are unaudited and have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management of the Company, the accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normally recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position at June 30, 2004 and the results of operations and the cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003.

The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the entire respective years. These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2003 interim condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to the 2004 presentation.

2. PROCEEDINGS UNDER CHAPTER 11 OF THE BANKRUPTCY CODE

On July 1, 2003, American HomePatient, Inc. emerged from bankruptcy pursuant to a “100% pay plan” whereby the Company’s shareholders retained their equity interest and all of the Company’s creditors and vendors will be paid 100% of all amounts they are owed, either

8

immediately or over time with interest. American HomePatient, Inc. and 24 of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) originally filed voluntary petitions for relief on July 31, 2002 to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Filing”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Tennessee (the “Bankruptcy Court”).

These cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”) were consolidated for the purpose of joint administration under Case Number 02-08915-GP3-11. On January 2, 2003, the Debtors filed their Second Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization (the “Proposed Plan”), proposed by the Debtors and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors appointed by the Office of the United States Trustee in the Chapter 11 Cases. The holders of the Company’s senior debt (the “Lenders”) objected to the Proposed Plan. On May 15, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court entered a memorandum opinion overruling the Lenders’ objections to the Proposed Plan. On May 27, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court entered an Order confirming the Proposed Plan (“Confirmation Order”) (hereafter referred to as the “Approved Plan”). On June 30, 2003, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee (the “District Court”) rejected the Lenders’ request to stay the effective date of the Approved Plan.

On July 1, 2003, the Company’s Approved Plan became effective and the Company successfully emerged from bankruptcy protection. The Lenders filed an appeal to the District Court of the order confirming the Approved Plan. On September 12, 2003, the District Court issued an opinion affirming in all respects the Confirmation Order. The Lenders have filed an appeal to the order confirming the Approved Plan with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit under Case Number 03-6500, which appeal is still pending. The Company intends to vigorously defend the Confirmation Order entered by the Bankruptcy Court and upheld by the District Court, but no assurances can be given as to the outcome of that appeal.

The Approved Plan allows the Company to continue its business operations uninterrupted, led by its current management team, and accomplishes the Company’s primary goal of restructuring its long-term debt obligations to its Lenders. In addition, the Approved Plan provides that the Company’s shareholders retain their equity interest in the Company and that all of the Company’s creditors and vendors will be paid 100% of all amounts they are owed, either immediately or over time with interest.

The Approved Plan provides for the treatment of all of the claims subject to compromise in the Bankruptcy Filing. The Approved Plan provides for the extension of the maturity on the debt to the Lenders, a reduction of the related interest cost on such debt, and the payment of all of the Company’s reported liabilities. The Lenders retained their liens on substantially all of the assets of the Company.

Pursuant to the Approved Plan, the Company’s secured debt to the Lenders is quantified at $250.0 million and is evidenced by a promissory note in that amount and is secured by various security agreements. To the Company’s knowledge, the Lenders have not executed the agreements as of the date of this filing. The Company is no longer a party to a credit agreement. The remainder of the amounts due to the Lenders at July 1, 2003 over and above the $250.0 million is treated as unsecured.

The Approved Plan provides that principal is payable annually on the $250.0 million secured debt on March 31 of each year, beginning March 31, 2005, in the amount of one-third of the

9

Company’s Excess Cash Flow (defined in the Approved Plan as cash in excess of $7.0 million at the end of each fiscal year) for the previous fiscal year with an estimated prepayment due on September 30, 2004 in an amount equal to one-half of the anticipated payment due on March 31, 2005. After the unsecured debt of the Lenders and the general unsecured debt is paid in full, 100% of the Company’s Excess Cash Flow is paid as a principal payment on the $250.0 million secured debt on March 31 of each year. An estimated prepayment is due on each previous September 30 in an amount equal to one-half of the anticipated March payment. Other than the Excess Cash Flow payments, there are no scheduled principal payments on the $250.0 million secured debt until it matures on July 1, 2009. The Approved Plan provides that interest is payable monthly on the $250.0 million secured debt at a rate of 6.785% per annum.

The Approved Plan treats the general unsecured debt and the Lenders’ unsecured debt in the same manner. Principal and accrued interest is payable semi-annually (on June 30 and December 31 of each year) in six equal installments beginning December 31, 2003. Interest accrues on this unsecured debt at an annual rate of 8.3675%. The holders of the unsecured debt also received an estimated prepayment of the Pro Rata Payment (as defined in the Approved Plan) on September 30, 2003. Because the Company did not have Excess Cash Flow for fiscal year 2003 (as defined by the Approved Plan), there was no Pro Rata Payment due on March 31, 2004. The Pro Rata Payment due on March 31, 2005 is in the amount of two-thirds of the Company’s Excess Cash Flow, if any, for the 2004 fiscal year. Additionally, an estimated prepayment is due on September 30, 2004 in an amount equal to one-half of the anticipated March 2005 Pro Rata Payment.

The Approved Plan allows the Company to make prepayments to holders of unsecured debt, either in whole or in part, at any time without penalty, which prepayments reduce and are a credit against any subsequent mandatory payments.

Prior to emergence from bankruptcy protection, the Company made adequate protection payments to the Lenders totaling approximately $15.8 million. Pursuant to the Approved Plan all of the adequate protection payments have been applied to the Lenders’ unsecured debt during 2003 as part of the 2003 scheduled payments and certain prepayments also have been made.

The Company has made all payments due as of June 30, 2004 under the Approved Plan, and has also prepaid some of its obligations thereunder. As of June 30, 2004, the Lenders were owed approximately $256.0 million, comprised of $250.0 million of secured debt and $6.0 million of unsecured debt. The remaining general unsecured claims (excluding the Government Settlement) as of June 30, 2004 were approximately $3.6 million. The Company plans to pay an additional $291,000 to the holders of general unsecured claims subsequent to June 30, 2004 to correct an error in the allocation of a prior payment.

On July 1, 2003, the Company paid, in full, unsecured claims that individually totaled $10,000 or less, according to the provisions of the Approved Plan. The total of these payments was $3.3 million.

The Bankruptcy Court issued an opinion ruling in favor of the Company’s request to reject the warrants originally issued to the Lenders to purchase 3,265,315 shares of the Company’s common stock for $.01 per share. As a result of the ruling, the warrants, which represented approximately 20% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, were rejected by the

10

Company. The Bankruptcy Court determined the damages stemming from rejection of the warrants were $846,000, which is payable by the Company to the warrant holders as an unsecured claim. The warrant holders have appealed the damages calculation determined in this ruling. If the Lenders are unsuccessful in their appeal, they will be entitled to receive payment from the Company for damages in the amount of $846,000, which will be treated as a general unsecured claim. If the Lenders’ appeal is successful, the amount owed to the warrant holders could substantially increase, which could materially adversely affect the Company’s cash flow and results from operations. The Company intends to vigorously defend the damages calculation determined by the Bankruptcy Court, but no assurances can be given as to the outcome of the Lenders’ appeal.

3. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

The Company applies the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB No. 25”) and related interpretations including FIN 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25”, to account for its fixed-plan stock options. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price on the date of grant. SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”), and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an amendment to FASB Statement No. 123” (“SFAS No. 148”), established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As permitted by existing accounting standards, the Company has elected to continue to apply the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting described above, and has adopted only the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, as amended. The following table illustrates the effect on net income if the fair-value-based method had been applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.

11

4. REORGANIZATION ITEMS

Reorganization items represent expenses that are incurred by the Company as a result of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code. Reorganization items for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003 were $71,000, $2,004,000, $71,000, and $2,856,000, respectively, and are comprised primarily of professional fees.

5. LIQUIDITY

As discussed in Note 2, on July 1, 2003, the Company’s Approved Plan became effective and the Company emerged from bankruptcy protection. In connection with the Approved Plan, the Amended Credit Agreement was terminated. Pursuant to the Approved Plan, as of the effective date of the Approved Plan the Company had secured debt to the Lenders of $250,000,000 and unsecured debt of $30,100,000. The secured debt is evidenced by a promissory note in that amount and is secured by various security agreements.

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company emerged from bankruptcy, achieved net income of $14,025,000, and improved operating results compared to the prior years. The 2003 results were favorably impacted by the exclusion of $12,510,000 in post-petition interest expense while the Company was in bankruptcy in 2003. The Company is focused on generating positive cash flow from operating activities, primarily through improvements in its operating results. For the year ended December 31, 2003, net cash provided by operating activities was $17,238,000. Notwithstanding this net cash provided by operating activities, the Company did not have Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Approved Plan), primarily because the Company made prepayments authorized under the Approved Plan. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company achieved net income of $1,995,000 and had $18,768,000 of cash provided by operating activities.

Total long-term debt and capital leases have decreased by $5,952,000 from $262,914,000 at December 31, 2003 to $256,962,000 at June 30, 2004. All of the Company’s debt has fixed interest rates, which on a weighted average was 6.83% at June 30, 2004.

The Company has scheduled current debt principal payments of $6,950,000, pre-petition accounts payable payments of $3,629,000, and minimum rental obligations of $9,886,000 under long-term operating leases due during the twelve months ending June 30, 2005. The Company is also obligated to pay any Excess Cash Flow for application on the Lenders’ secured and unsecured debt as well as to holders of other unsecured debt. During 2003, the Company made payments, including some pre-payments, on the Lenders’ unsecured debt, as well as on other unsecured debt totaling $29.5 million. The Company has the option to apply the pre-payments against future required payments, including the required 2004 payments; however, the Company intends to continue making payments to the Lenders and general unsecured creditors (as defined in the Approved Plan) if it has sufficient cash.

12

As of June 30, 2004, the Company had approximately $3,590,000 in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and $21,214,000 of working capital. The Company’s consolidated cash flows from operations for the year ended December 31, 2003 and through June 30, 2004 were sufficient to meet 2003 and year to date 2004 debt and lease obligations. Management believes that the Company can operate on its existing cash and cash flow and make all payments provided for in the Approved Plan through June 30, 2005. The Medicare reimbursement reductions that became effective January 2004 impacted the Company’s profitability and ability to improve its liquidity and capital resources as compared to 2003. The adverse impact that the scheduled 2005 reimbursement reductions will have on the Company’s future operating results and financial condition will be material in 2005 and beyond. The magnitude of this impact will depend upon the success of the Company’s efforts to grow revenues, improve productivity, and reduce costs. It also will depend upon final resolution of lobbying efforts to modify the pricing changes. See “Trends, Events, and Uncertainties - Reimbursement Changes and the Company’s Response” and “Risk Factors – Medicare Reimbursement Reductions.”

In order to meet its future payment obligations, the Company must continue to improve its cash flow from operations. There can be no assurance that the Company’s operations will improve as rapidly as anticipated. The failure to make its periodic debt, lease and other financial obligations, or the failure to extend, refinance or repay any of its debt obligations as they become due would have a material adverse effect upon the Company.

The Company’s future liquidity will continue to be dependent upon the relative amounts of current assets (principally cash, accounts receivable and inventories) and current liabilities (principally accounts payable and accrued expenses). In that regard, the level and quality of accounts receivable can have a significant impact on the Company’s liquidity. The Company has various types of accounts receivable, the majority of which are patient receivables. Accounts receivable are generally outstanding for longer periods of time in the health care industry than many other industries because of requirements to provide third-party payors with additional information subsequent to billing and the time required by such payors to process claims. Certain accounts receivable frequently are outstanding for more than 90 days, particularly where the account receivable relates to services for a patient receiving a new medical therapy or covered by private insurance or Medicaid. Net patient accounts receivable were $55,610,000 and $56,940,000 at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Average days’ sales in accounts receivable (“DSO”) was approximately 63 and 60 days at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The Company calculates DSO by dividing the previous 90 days of revenue (excluding dispositions and acquisitions), net of bad debt expense into net patient accounts receivable and multiplying the ratio by 90 days. The Company’s level of DSO and net patient receivables is affected by the extended time required to obtain necessary billing documentation. The Company’s DSO for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 was impacted negatively by delays in billing and collection caused by HIPAA implementation in the last quarter of 2003 and by a slow down in Medicaid payments by some states.

The Company’s future liquidity and capital resources will also be materially adversely impacted by the Medicare reimbursement reductions contained in the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Trends, Events, and Uncertainties – Reimbursement Changes and the Company’s Response.”

13

In accordance with the Approved Plan, none of the Company’s current debt and lease agreements contain financial and other restrictive covenants. However, any non-payment, or other default with respect to the Company’s debt obligations could cause the Company’s Lenders to attempt to declare defaults, accelerate payment obligations or foreclose upon the assets securing such indebtedness or exercise their remedies with respect to such assets. Any of such events, if appropriately taken by the Lenders, would have a material adverse impact on the Company.

6. GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATION AND LITIGATION

On June 11, 2001, a settlement agreement (the “Government Settlement”) was entered among the Company, the United States of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and on behalf of the Office of Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”) and the TRICARE Management Activity, and a former Company employee, as relator. The Government Settlement was approved by the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, the court in which the relator’s false claim action was filed. The Government Settlement covers alleged improprieties by the Company during the period from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 1998, including allegedly improper billing activities and allegedly improper remuneration to and contracts with physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers. Pursuant to the Government Settlement, the Company made an initial payment of $3,000,000 in the second quarter of 2001 and agreed to make additional payments in the principal amount of $4,000,000, together with interest on this amount, in installments due at various times until March 2006. The Company also paid the relator’s attorneys’ fees and expenses. Pursuant to the Approved Plan, amounts owed pursuant to the Government Settlement will be paid in full in accordance with the Government Settlement, and the Company has made all payments due to date under the Government Settlement. During the six month period ended June 30, 2004, the Company paid $880,000, including interest of $380,000, pursuant to the Government Settlement. At June 30, 2004, the Company had an accrual of $3,511,000 for its remaining obligations pursuant to the Government Settlement. Of the total accrual related to the Government Settlement, $511,000 is included in other accrued expenses and $3,000,000 is included in other noncurrent liabilities on the accompanying interim condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2004.

7. INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Income per share is measured at two levels: basic income per share and diluted income per share. Basic income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares after considering the additional dilution related to stock options and warrants. In computing diluted income per share, the outstanding stock warrants and stock options are considered dilutive using the treasury stock method.

14

The following information is necessary to calculate income per share for the periods presented:

8. RECENTLY ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, revised December 2003, (“FIN 46R”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R replaced FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidations of Variable Interest Entities”, which was issued in January 2003. Beginning in 2004, the Company was required to apply FIN 46R to variable interests in variable interest entities (“VIEs”).

The adoption of FIN 46R did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as none of the existing VIEs need to be consolidated by the Company.

FASB Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”, was issued in May 2003. This Statement established standards for the classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The Statement also includes required disclosures for financial instruments within its scope. For the Company, the Statement was effective for instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise was effective as of January 1, 2004, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. For certain manditorily redeemable financial instruments, the Statement will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2005. The effective date has been deferred indefinitely for certain other types of manditorily redeemable financial instruments. Adoption of FASB Statement No. 150 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as the Company currently does not have any financial instruments that are within the scope of this Statement.

15

ITEM 2 - MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, without limitation, statements containing the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “expects,” “estimates,” “projects,” “may,” “plan,” “will,” “likely,” “could” and words of similar import. Such statements include statements concerning the Company’s Approved Plan (as defined in Note 2 to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements), other effects and consequences of the Bankruptcy Filing (as defined in Note 2 to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements), forecasts upon which the Approved Plan is based, business strategy, the ability to satisfy interest expense and principal repayment obligations, operations, cost savings initiatives, industry, economic performance, financial condition, liquidity and capital resources, adoption of, or changes in, accounting policies and practices, existing government regulations and changes in, or the failure to comply with, governmental regulations, legislative proposals for healthcare reform, the ability to enter into strategic alliances and arrangements with managed care providers on an acceptable basis, and changes in reimbursement policies. Such statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to various risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in such forward-looking statements because of a number of factors, including those identified in the “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Company does not undertake to update the forward-looking statements or to update the reasons that actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

General

The Company provides home health care services and products to patients through its 283 centers in 35 states. These services and products are primarily paid for by Medicare, Medicaid and other third-party payors. As a result, prices for the Company’s products and services are set by the payors and not by the Company. Since the Company cannot affect pricing, it can improve operating results primarily by increasing the number of units sold and rented and controlling expenses. It can improve cash flow by limiting the amount of time that it takes to collect payment after delivering products and services. Key indicators of performance include:

     Sales and Rentals. Operating in an industry with pre-set prices makes it crucial to increase revenues by increasing the volume of sales and rentals. Over the past three years, the Company has increased its focus on sales and marketing efforts in an effort to improve revenues. Continuing these efforts will be critical to the Company’s success. Management closely tracks overall increases and decreases in sales and rentals as well as increases and decreases by product line and branch location and region. Management’s goal is to identify geographic or product line weaknesses and take corrective actions. Shareholders should realize that reductions in reimbursement levels can more than offset increased sales and rental volumes. See “Trends, Events, and Uncertainties – Reimbursement Changes and the Company’s Response.”

16

     Bad Debt Expense. Billing and collecting in the healthcare industry is extremely complex. Rigorous substantive and procedural standards are set by each third party payor, and failure to adhere to these standards can lead to non-payment, which can have a significant impact on the Company’s net income and cash flow. The Company measures bad debt as a percent of net sales and rentals, and management considers this percentage a key indicator in monitoring its billing and collection function. Bad debt expense as a percentage of net revenue has decreased in the past three years from 4.6% in 2001 to 3.6% in 2002 to 3.1% in 2003 to 3.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Management’s goal is to further lower this percentage in 2004, but management anticipates that the rate of decrease may be less in the remainder of 2004.

     Cash Flow. The Company’s funding of day-to-day operations going forward and all payments required under the Approved Plan will rely on cash flow and cash on hand as it has since the Lenders terminated the Company’s ability to access a revolving line of credit in 2000. The Approved Plan also obligates the Company to pay Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the Approved Plan) to creditors to reduce the Company’s debt. The nature of the Company’s business also requires substantial capital expenditures in order to buy the equipment used to generate revenues. As a result, management views cash flow as particularly critical to the Company’s operations. The Company’s future liquidity will continue to be dependent upon the relative amounts of current assets (principally cash, accounts receivable and inventories) and current liabilities (principally accounts payable and accrued expenses). Management attempts to monitor and improve cash flow in a number of ways, including inventory utilization analysis, cash flow forecasting, and accounts receivable collection. In that regard, the length of time that it takes to collect receivables can have a significant impact on the Company’s liquidity as described below in “Days Sales Outstanding.”

     Days Sales Outstanding. DSO is a measure used by management to assess collections and the consequent impact on cash flow. The Company calculates DSO by dividing the previous 90 days of revenue (excluding dispositions and acquisitions), net of bad debt expense into net patient accounts receivable and multiplying the ratio by 90 days. The Company attempts to minimize DSO by screening new patient cases for adequate sources of reimbursement and by providing complete and accurate claims data to relevant payor sources. The Company monitors DSO trends for each of its branches and billing centers, and for the Company in total, as part of the management of the billing and collections process. An increase in DSO usually indicates a breakdown in processes at the billing centers. A decline in DSO usually results from process improvements and improved cash collections. Management uses DSO trends to monitor, evaluate and improve the performance of the billing centers. The decrease in DSO in the past three years from 68 in 2001 to 61 in 2002 to 60 in 2003 is due to improved collection results on current billings and improved timeliness in obtaining necessary billing documentation. Management’s goal is to lower DSO in 2004. The Company’s DSO for the six months ended June 30, 2004 was 63, having been impacted negatively by delays in billing and collection caused by HIPAA implementation in the last quarter of 2003 and a slow down in Medicaid payments by some states. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Trends, Events, and Uncertainties – HIPAA” and “-Medicaid.”

     Unbilled Revenue. Another key indicator of the Company’s receivable collection efforts is the amount of unbilled revenue which reports the amount of sales and rental revenues which have not yet been billed to the payors due to incomplete documentation or the receipt of the Certificate of

17

Medical Necessity (“CMN”). At June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the amount of unbilled revenue net of allowances was $10.6 million and $10.2 million, respectively.

     Productivity and Profitability. As discussed above, the fixed priced reimbursement in our industry makes it particularly important to control expenses. Management considers many of the Company’s expenses to be either fixed costs or cost of goods sold, which are difficult to reduce or eliminate. As a result, management’s primary areas of focus for expense reduction and containment are productivity analysis and profitability analysis. For instance, management analyzes billing center productivity using measures such as monthly revenue processed per full time equivalent (FTE) and monthly claims processed per FTE, with the goal of increasing productivity and eliminating the resulting excess capacity. This analysis has enabled the Company to consolidate billing centers and reduce expenses. Moreover, it helps identify and standardize best practices and identify and correct deficiencies. Similarly, the Company monitors its business on a branch, geographic area, and product-line basis to identify opportunities for gains in productivity and to target growth or contraction. This analysis has led to the past closure or sale of businesses and to the expansion of product lines and new sales initiatives. Management anticipates that further closures and consolidation will occur in light of the Medicare reimbursement reductions recently implemented. See “Trends, Events, and Uncertainties – Reimbursement Changes and the Company’s Response.”

Trends, Events, and Uncertainties

From time to time changes occur in our industry or our business such that it is reasonably likely that aspects of our future operating results will be materially different than our historical operating results. Sometimes these matters have not occurred but probability of their occurrence is sufficient as to raise doubt regarding the likelihood that historical operating results are an accurate gauge of future performance. The Company attempts to identify and describe these trends, events, and uncertainties to assist investors in assessing the likely future performance of the Company. Investors should understand that these matters typically are new, sometimes are unforeseen, and often are fluid in nature. Moreover, the matters described below are not the only issues that can result in variances between past and future performance nor are they necessarily the only material trends, events, and uncertainties that will effect the Company. As a result, investors are encouraged to use this and other information to ascertain for themselves the likelihood that past performance is indicative of future performance.

The following trends, events, and uncertainties have been identified by the Company as reasonably likely to materially affect the comparison of historical operating results reported herein to either other past period results or to future operating results:

     Reimbursement Changes and the Company’s Response. The reimbursement reductions contained in the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (“Act”) will negatively impact the Company’s future operating results, liquidity and capital resources. A provision in the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 required that the reimbursement rate for inhalation drugs used with a nebulizer be reduced from 95% of the average wholesale price (AWP) to 80% of AWP effective January 1, 2004. Beginning January 1, 2005, the reimbursement for inhalation drugs will be further reduced to the average manufacturer’s sales price plus six percent (ASP + 6%). Revenue in the first six months of 2004 was reduced by approximately $3.7 million as result of an approximate 15.8%

18

reduction in the Medicare reimbursement rates for inhalation drugs effective January 1, 2004. Management believes that the reimbursement reductions scheduled to take effect January 1, 2005 with respect to the Company’s inhalation drug business, which constitutes approximately 12% of the Company’s year to date 2004 revenues, will have the greatest impact on the Company’s operating results. Management believes that the scheduled reductions could force providers to exit the inhalation drug business, which in turn could create difficulties for Medicare beneficiaries needing inhalation drugs to obtain these drugs under current Medicare regulations. Management is taking a number of steps in an effort to reduce the expected impact of the reimbursement reductions contained in the Act, including initiatives to grow revenues, improve productivity, and reduce costs. The Company also is undertaking a number of efforts, including lobbying lawmakers and regulators, aimed at addressing the Medicare patient drug availability issues created by the inhalation drug reimbursement reductions scheduled for January 1, 2005, with the hope of modifying the pricing changes for inhalation drugs to avoid patient drug availability issues.

In July 2004, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) announced possible rulemaking that could impact fees paid for dispensing of inhalation drugs. CMS is seeking comments on adding a separate dispensing fee for inhalation drugs that would be in addition to the difference between the amount the supplier paid for the drug and the Medicare payment for the drugs. CMS has asked for comments on such a fee in light of other Medicare regulations that effect inhalation drug reimbursement. The Company intends to respond to the request for comments, and it is too early to know what impact, if any, the new rules may have on inhalation drug reimbursement, particularly given CMS’ apparent view that any such dispensing fee adjustments will only need to be a short-term adjustment for 2005 as a new Medicare Part D provision that takes effect in 2006 will work to shift patients away from nebulizers and towards metered dose inhalers.

The magnitude of the adverse impact that the Act’s reimbursement reductions will have on the Company’s future operating results and financial condition will depend upon the success of the Company’s revenue growth and cost reduction initiatives as well as its lobbying efforts, but the adverse impact will likely be material in 2005 and beyond. The Company hopes to offset much of the 2004 impact through revenue growth and cost reductions. However, as with all projections, there can be no guarantee that management’s projections will be achieved.

Included in the Act is a freeze in the reimbursement rates for certain durable medical equipment at those rates in effect on October 1, 2003. These reimbursement rates will remain in effect until the start of a competitive bidding process, which is scheduled to begin in 2007. The Company does not know which of its locations will be included in the competitive bidding process. In addition, the reimbursement for 16 durable medical and respiratory items will be reduced to the median Federal Employee Health Benefit Plan rate which some analysts estimate to be a cut of approximately 10% on average.

In February 2004 the executive branch of the federal government released the fiscal year 2005 budget for the Department of Health and Human Services that contained a provision to eliminate the Medicare capped rental program. Under the current provisions of Medicare regulations, the Company receives rental payments for certain durable medical equipment for fifteen months and then receives a semi-annual maintenance payment which is equal to one month’s rent. The proposed budget would eliminate the rental payments for the fourteenth and fifteenth months and

19

reimburse durable medical equipment repair costs at actual cost, eliminating the semi-annual payment. The items affected by this proposed budget are durable medical equipment items traditionally rented to Medicare and Medicaid patients, such as hospital beds, wheelchairs, nebulizers, etc. As the budget has not yet been approved, the magnitude of the adverse impact that the budget could have on the Company’s future operating results is not yet known.

     HIPAA. HIPAA has mandated an extensive set of regulations to protect the privacy of individually identifiable health information. The regulations consist of three sets of standards, each with a different date for required compliance: (1) Privacy Standards had a compliance date of April 14, 2003; (2) Transactions and Code Sets Standards required compliance by October 16, 2002, except as extended by one year to October 16, 2003 for providers that filed a compliance extension form by October 15, 2002; and (3) Security Standards which were published in final form on February 2, 2003 and have a compliance date of April 21, 2005. The Company has filed its compliance extension form and is actively pursuing its strategies toward compliance with the final Privacy Standards and Transaction and Code Sets Standards. The Company’s HIPAA compliance plan will require modifications to existing information management systems and physical security mechanisms, and may require additional personnel as well as extensive training of existing personnel, the full cost of which has not yet been determined. The Company cannot predict the impact that final regulations, when fully implemented, will have on its operations. The Company’s implementation of mandated HIPAA Transaction and Code Sets has resulted in disruptions to cash collections, and additional disruptions may occur in the future. Further, the Company cannot predict when all payors and clearinghouses will be fully HIPAA Transaction compliant and able to process electronic claims. Alternative methods of claims submission may be required, possibly resulting in delay in payment, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s result of operations, cash flow, and financial condition.

     Medicaid. The Company has experienced delays in reimbursement from several state Medicaid programs. These delays are primarily the result of the state programs becoming compliant with the new HIPAA Transaction and Code Sets and/or changing the intermediary contracted by the state to process claims submitted by the providers. The Company can not predict when these states will be fully HIPAA Transaction compliant and will resume processing claims at a rate consistent with past performance, if at all.

     Approved Plan. On July 1, 2003, American HomePatient, Inc. and 24 of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) emerged from bankruptcy pursuant to a 100% pay plan (the “Approved Plan”) whereby shareholders retained their equity interest and the Company’s creditors and vendors will be paid 100% of amounts they are owed, either immediately or over time with interest. The Approved Plan fixed the interest on the Company’s debt at 6.785% for the secured debt and 8.3675% for the unsecured debt, thus eliminating all material interest rate risk for the Company. The Approved Plan set terms for repayment of the Company’s outstanding debt and other terms, all as described in more detail in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

The Lenders have filed an appeal of the order confirming the Approved Plan with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit appealing both the Bankruptcy Court’s determination of the amount of their secured claim and the interest rates on both the secured and unsecured portions of their claims. The Case Number for this appeal, which is still pending, is

20

03-6500. The Company intends to vigorously defend the Confirmation Order entered by the Bankruptcy Court and upheld by the District Court, and the Company anticipates professional and other fees will be incurred in 2004 in connection with the appeal process. The outcome of the appeal cannot be predicted, and an adverse ruling could have a material adverse effect on the Company. See Note 2 to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements “Proceedings under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Pursuant to a motion filed by the Company, the Bankruptcy Court issued an opinion ruling in favor of the Company’s request to reject warrants held by the Lenders that represented approximately 20% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The Lenders now are entitled to an additional unsecured claim of approximately $846,000, which is the judicially determined damages as of July 30, 2002, the date immediately prior to the Company’s bankruptcy filing stemming from rejection of the warrants. The warrant holders have appealed the damages determination in this ruling. If the appeal is successful, the amount owed to the warrant holders could substantially increase, which could materially adversely affect the Company’s cash flow and results from operations.

     Product Mix. The Company’s strategy for 2003 was to maintain a diversified offering of home health care services reflective of its current business mix. For 2004, respiratory services will remain a primary focus along with home medical equipment rental and enteral nutrition products and services.

     Financial Presentation. The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements for 2003 have been prepared on a going concern basis and in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position (“SOP”) 90-7. Accordingly, these consolidated financial statements do not reflect any adjustments that might result if the Company was unable to continue as a going concern. Revenues, expenses, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses and expenses resulting from the reorganization are reported separately as reorganization items. Cash used for reorganization items is disclosed separately in the consolidated statements of cash flows. Since the Company emerged from bankruptcy, the accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements have not been presented, as during the bankruptcy proceedings, to reflect liabilities subject to compromise.

Services and Products

The Company provides a diversified range of home health care services and products. The following table sets forth the percentage of revenues represented by each line of business for the periods presented:

21

     Home Respiratory Therapy Services. The Company provides a wide variety of home respiratory services primarily to patients with severe and chronic pulmonary diseases. Patients are referred to a Company center most often by primary care and pulmonary physicians as well as by hospital discharge planners and case managers. After reviewing pertinent medical records on the patient and confirming insurance coverage information, a Company respiratory therapist or technician visits the patient’s home to deliver and to prepare the prescribed therapy or equipment. Company representatives coordinate the prescribed therapy with the patient’s physician and train the patient and caregiver in the correct use of the equipment. For rental patients, Company representatives also make periodic follow-up visits to the home to provide additional instructions, perform required equipment maintenance and deliver oxygen and other supplies.

The respiratory services that the Company provides include the following:

•		Oxygen systems to assist patients with breathing. There are three types of oxygen systems: (i) oxygen concentrators, which are stationary units that filter ordinary room air to provide a continuous flow of oxygen; (ii) liquid oxygen systems, which are portable, thermally-insulated containers of liquid oxygen which can be used as stationary units and/or as portable options for patients; and (iii) high pressure oxygen cylinders, which are used primarily for portability as an adjunct to oxygen concentrators. Oxygen systems are prescribed by physicians for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cystic fibrosis and neurologically-related respiratory problems.
•		Nebulizers to deliver inhalation drugs to patients. Nebulizer compressors are used to administer aerosolized medications (such as albuterol) to patients with asthma, bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and cystic fibrosis. “AerMeds” is the Company’s registered marketing name for its aerosol medications program.
•		Home ventilators to sustain a patient’s respiratory function mechanically in cases of severe respiratory failure when a patient can no longer breathe independently.
•		Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (“NPPV”) to provide ventilation support via a face mask for patients with chronic respiratory failure and neuromuscular diseases. This therapy enables patients to receive positive pressure ventilation without the invasive procedure of intubation.
•		Continuous positive airway pressure (“CPAP”) and bi-level positive airway pressure therapies to force air through respiratory passage-ways during sleep. These treatments are used on adults with obstructive sleep apnea (“OSA”), a condition in which a patient’s normal breathing patterns are disturbed during sleep.
•		Apnea monitors to monitor and to warn parents of apnea episodes in newborn infants as a preventive measure against sudden infant death syndrome.
•		Home respiratory evaluations and related diagnostic equipment to assist physicians in identifying, monitoring and managing their respiratory patients.

Oxygen systems comprised approximately 36% of the Company’s year-to-date 2004 revenues. Inhalation drugs and nebulizers comprised approximately 12% and 3%, respectively, of the

22

Company’s total 2004 revenues. All other respiratory products and services comprised approximately 21% of the Company’s total 2004 revenues. The Company provides respiratory therapy services at all but six of its 283 centers.

     Home Infusion Therapy Services. The Company provides a wide range of home infusion therapy services. Patients are referred to a Company center most often by primary care and specialist physicians (such as infectious disease physicians and oncologists) as well as by hospital discharge planners and case managers. After confirming the patient’s treatment plan with the physician, the pharmacist mixes the medications and coordinates with the nurse the delivery of necessary equipment, medication and supplies to the patient’s home. The Company provides the patient and caregiver with detailed instructions on the patient’s prescribed medication, therapy, pump and supplies. For rental patients, the Company also schedules follow-up visits and deliveries in accordance with physicians’ orders.

Home infusion therapy involves the administration of nutrients, antibiotics and other medications intravenously (into the vein), subcutaneously (under the skin), intramuscularly (into the muscle), intrathecally (via spinal routes), epidurally (also via spinal routes) or through feeding tubes into the digestive tract. The primary infusion therapy services that the Company provides include the following:

•		Enteral nutrition is the infusion of nutrients through a feeding tube inserted directly into the functioning portion of a patient’s digestive tract. This long-term therapy is often prescribed for patients who are unable to eat or to drink normally as a result of a neurological impairment such as a stroke or a neoplasm (tumor).
•		Anti-infective therapy is the infusion of anti-infective medications into a patient’s bloodstream typically for 5 to 14 days to treat a variety of serious bacterial and viral infections and diseases.
•		Total parenteral nutrition (“TPN”) is the long-term provision of nutrients through central vein catheters that are surgically implanted into patients who cannot absorb adequate nutrients enterally due to a chronic gastrointestinal condition.
•		Pain management involves the infusion of certain drugs into the bloodstream of patients, primarily terminally or chronically ill patients, suffering from acute or chronic pain.
•		Other infusion therapies include chemotherapy, hydration, growth hormone and immune globulin therapies.

Enteral nutrition services account for approximately 6% of the Company’s total revenues in 2004. Antibiotic therapy, TPN, and pain management and other infusion revenues accounted for approximately 6% of the Company’s year-to-date revenues in 2004. Enteral nutrition services are provided at most of the Company’s centers, and the Company currently provides other infusion therapies in 45 of its 283 centers.

     Home Medical Equipment and Medical Supplies. The Company provides a comprehensive line of equipment and supplies to serve the needs of home care patients. Revenues from home

23

equipment and supplies are derived principally from the rental and sale of wheelchairs, hospital beds, ambulatory aids, bathroom aids and safety equipment, and rehabilitation equipment. Sales and rentals of home medical equipment and sales of medical supplies account for 17% of the Company’s year-to-date revenues in 2004.

Government Regulation

     General. The Company, as a participant in the health care industry, is subject to extensive federal, state and local regulation. In addition to the Federal False Claims Act (“False Claims Act”) and other federal and state anti-kickback and self-referral laws applicable to all of the Company’s operations (discussed more fully below), the operations of the Company’s home health care centers are subject to federal laws covering the repackaging and dispensing of drugs (including oxygen) and regulating interstate motor-carrier transportation. Such centers also are subject to state laws (most notably licensing and controlled substances registration) governing pharmacies, nursing services and certain types of home health agency activities.

The Company’s operations are also subject to a series of laws and regulations dating back to 1987 that apply to the Company’s operations. Changes have occurred from time to time since 1987, including reimbursement reductions and changes to payment rules.

The Federal False Claims Act imposes civil liability on individuals or entities that submit false or fraudulent claims to the government for payment. False Claims Act penalties for violations can include sanctions, including civil monetary penalties.

As a provider of services under the federal reimbursement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and TRICARE, the Company is subject to the federal statute known as the anti-kickback statute, also known as the “fraud and abuse law.” This law prohibits any bribe, kickback, rebate or remuneration of any kind in return for, or as an inducement for, the referral of patients for government-reimbursed health care services.

The Company may also be affected by the federal physician self-referral prohibition, known as the “Stark Law,” which, with certain exceptions, prohibits physicians from referring patients to entities with which they have a financial relationship. Many states in which the Company operates have adopted similar fraud and abuse and self-referral laws, as well as laws that prohibit certain direct or indirect payments or fee-splitting arrangements between health care providers, under the theory that such arrangements are designed to induce or to encourage the referral of patients to a particular provider. In many states, these laws apply to services reimbursed by all payor sources.

In 1996, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) introduced a new category of federal criminal health care fraud offenses. If a violation of a federal criminal law relates to a health care benefit, then an individual is guilty of committing a Federal Health Care Offense. The specific offenses are: health care fraud, theft or embezzlement, false statements, obstruction of an investigation, and money laundering. These crimes can apply to claims submitted not only to government reimbursement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and TRICARE, but to any third-party payor, and carry penalties including fines and imprisonment. HIPAA has mandated an extensive set of regulations to protect the privacy of individually identifiable health information. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Trends, Events, and Uncertainties – HIPAA.”

24

The Company must follow strict requirements with paperwork and billing. As required by law, it is Company policy that certain service charges (as defined by Medicare) falling under Medicare Part B are confirmed with a CMN signed by a physician. In January 1999, the OIG published a draft Model Compliance Plan for the Durable Medical Equipment, Prosthetics, Orthotics and Supply Industry. The OIG has stressed the importance for all health care providers to have an effective compliance plan. The Company has created and implemented a compliance program, which it believes meets the elements of the OIG’s Model Plan for the industry. As part of its compliance program, the Company performs internal audits of the adequacy of billing documentation. The Company’s policy is to voluntarily refund to the government any reimbursements previously received for claims with insufficient documentation that are identified in this process and that cannot be corrected. The Company periodically reviews and updates its policies and procedures in an effort to comply with applicable laws and regulations; however, certain proceedings have been and may in the future be commenced against the Company alleging violations of applicable laws governing the operation of the Company’s business and its billing practices.

The Company is also subject to state laws governing Medicaid, professional training, licensure, financial relationships with physicians and the dispensing and storage of pharmaceuticals. The facilities operated by the Company must comply with all applicable laws, regulations and licensing standards and many of the Company’s employees must maintain licenses to provide some of the services offered by the Company. Additionally, certain of the Company’s employees are subject to state laws and regulations governing the professional practice of respiratory therapy, pharmacy and nursing.

Information about individuals and other health care providers who have been sanctioned or excluded from participation in government reimbursement programs is readily available on the Internet, and all health care providers, including the Company, are held responsible for carefully screening entities and individuals they employ or do business with, to avoid contracting with an excluded provider. The entity cannot bill government programs for services or supplies provided by an excluded provider, and the federal government may also impose sanctions, including financial penalties, on companies that contract with excluded providers.

Health care law is an area of extensive and dynamic regulatory oversight. Changes in laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations can have a dramatic effect on permissible activities, the relative costs associated with doing business, and the amount and availability of reimbursement from government and other third-party payors. There can be no assurance that federal, state, or local governments will not impose additional standards or change existing standards or interpretations.

     Enforcement Activities. In recent years, various state and federal regulatory agencies have stepped up investigative and enforcement activities with respect to the health care industry, and many health care providers, including the Company and other durable medical equipment suppliers, have received subpoenas and other requests for information in connection with their business operations and practices. From time to time, the Company also receives notices and subpoenas from various government agencies concerning plans to audit the Company, or requesting information regarding certain aspects of the Company’s business. The Company cooperates with the various agencies in responding to such subpoenas and requests. The Company expects to incur additional legal expenses in the future in connection with existing and future investigations.

25

The government has broad authority and discretion in enforcing applicable laws and regulations; therefore, the scope and outcome of any such investigations, inquiries, or legal actions cannot be predicted. There can be no assurance that federal, state or local governments will not impose additional regulations upon the Company’s activities nor that the Company’s past activities will not be found to have violated some of the governing laws and regulations. Any such regulatory changes or findings of violations of laws could adversely affect the Company’s business and financial position, and could even result in the exclusion of the Company from participating in Medicare, Medicaid, and other contracts for goods or services reimbursed by the government.

     Legal Proceedings. The following is a summary of the Company’s material legal proceedings:

On June 11, 2001, a settlement agreement (the “OIG Settlement” or “Government Settlement”) was entered among the Company, the United States of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and on behalf of the OIG and the TRICARE Management Activity, and a former Company employee, as relator. The Government Settlement was approved by the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky, the court in which the relator’s false claim action was filed. The Government Settlement covers alleged improprieties by the Company during the period from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 1998, including allegedly improper billing activities and allegedly improper remuneration to and contracts with physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers. Pursuant to the Government Settlement, the Company made an initial payment of $3,000,000 in the second quarter of 2001 and agreed to make additional payments in the principal amount of $4,000,000, together with interest on this amount, in installments due at various times until March 2006. An installment of $880,000, including interest of $380,000, was due and paid on March 11, 2004. The Company also paid the relator’s attorneys fees and expenses. Pursuant to the Approved Plan, the amounts owed pursuant to the Government Settlement will be paid in full in accordance with the Government Settlement. As of June 30, 2004, the Company has an accrual of $3,511,000 for its obligations pursuant to the Government Settlement, of which $511,000 is classified as a current liability and $3,000,000 included in other noncurrent liabilities. See also “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Trends, Events, and Uncertainties – Approved Plan.”

Critical Accounting Policies

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are based upon the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its critical accounting policies and estimates.

A “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the understanding of the financial condition and results of operations of the Company and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about

26

the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. Management believes the following accounting policies fit this definition:

     Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. The Company provides credit for a substantial part of its non third-party reimbursed revenues and continually monitors the credit-worthiness and collectibility of amounts due from its patients. Approximately 62% of the Company’s 2004 revenues are derived from participation in Medicare and state Medicaid programs. Amounts paid under these programs are generally based upon a fixed rate. Revenues are recorded at the expected reimbursement rates when the services are provided or when merchandise or equipment is delivered to patients. Revenues are recorded net of estimated adjustments for billing errors or other reimbursement adjustments. Although amounts earned under the Medicare and Medicaid programs are subject to review by such third-party payors, subsequent adjustments to reimbursements as a result of such reviews are historically insignificant as these reimbursements are based on fixed fee schedules. In the opinion of management, adequate provision has been made for any adjustment that may result from such reviews. Any differences between estimated settlements and final determinations are reflected as an adjustment to revenue in the year finalized.

Sales and related services revenues include all product sales to patients and are derived from the provision of infusion therapies, the sale of home health care equipment and supplies, the sale of aerosol medications and respiratory therapy equipment and supplies, and services related to the delivery of these products. Sales revenues are recognized at the time of delivery using fixed fee schedules based upon the type of product and the payor, and are billed when the Company has obtained the properly completed CMN from the healthcare provider, where applicable. Rentals and other patient revenues are derived from the rental of home health care equipment, enteral pumps and equipment related to the provision of respiratory therapy. All rentals of equipment are provided by the Company on a month-to-month basis and are billed using fixed monthly fee schedules based upon the type of rental and the payor, when the Company has obtained the properly completed CMN from the healthcare provider, where applicable. The fixed monthly fee encompasses the rental of the product as well as the delivery and the set-up and instruction by the product technician.

The Company recognizes revenues at the time services are performed or products are delivered and all necessary medical documentation is obtained. As such, a portion of patient receivables consists of unbilled revenue for which the Company has not obtained all of the necessary medical documentation, but has provided the service or equipment. The Company calculates its allowance for doubtful accounts based upon the type of receivable (billed or unbilled) as well as the age of the receivable. As a receivable balance ages, an increasingly larger allowance is recorded for the receivable. All billed receivables over one year old and all unbilled receivables over 180 days old are fully reserved. Management believes that the recorded allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate and that historical collections substantiate the percentages used in the allowance valuation process. However, the Company is subject to further loss to the extent uncollectible receivables exceed its allowance for doubtful accounts. If the Company were to experience a deterioration in the aging of its accounts receivable due to disruptions or a slow down in cash collections, the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts and bad debt expense would likely increase from current levels. Conversely, an improvement in the Company’s cash collection trends and in its receivable aging would likely result in a decrease in both the allowance for doubtful accounts and bad debt expense.

27

The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts totaled approximately $18.4 million and $17.5 million as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

     Inventory Valuation and Cost of Sales Recognition. Inventories represent goods and supplies and are priced at the lower of cost (on a first-in, first-out basis) or market value. The Company recognizes cost of sales and relieves inventory on an interim basis at a standard rate, based upon the type of product sold and payor mix, and performs physical counts of inventory at each center on an annual basis. The Company records a valuation allowance for its estimated count adjustments and the difference between inventory actual costs and standard costs. The Company is subject to loss for inventory adjustments in excess of the recorded inventory valuation allowance. The inventory valuation allowance was $0.4 and $0.6 million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

     Rental Equipment Valuation. Rental equipment is rented to patients for use in their homes and is depreciated over the equipment’s estimated useful life. On an annual basis, the Company performs physical counts of rental equipment at each center and reconciles all recorded rental assets to internal billing reports. Any resulting adjustment for unlocated, damaged, or obsolete equipment is charged to rental equipment depreciation expense. Since rental equipment is maintained in the patient’s home, the Company is subject to loss resulting from lost equipment as well as losses for damaged, outdated, or obsolete equipment. Management records a valuation allowance for its estimated lost, damaged, outdated, or obsolete rental equipment based upon historical adjustment amounts and believes the recorded rental allowance is adequate. The Company is subject to loss for unrecorded adjustments in excess of its recorded rental equipment valuation allowance. The Company’s rental equipment valuation allowance totaled $1.1 million and $0.9 million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.

     Valuation of Long-lived Assets. Management evaluates the Company’s long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Management utilizes estimated undiscounted future cash flows to determine if an impairment exists. When this analysis indicates an impairment exists, the amount of loss is determined based upon a comparison of estimated fair value with the carrying value of the asset. While management believes that the estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially affect the evaluations.

     Valuation of Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are required to be tested for impairment on an annual basis and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it is reasonably possible that an impairment may exist. The Company selected September 30 as its annual testing date. Goodwill is tested for impairment by comparing the fair value of goodwill to the carrying value of goodwill. The fair value is determined using a combination of analyses which included discounted cash flow calculations, market multiples and other market information. Key assumptions used in these estimates include projected operating results, discount rates and peer market multiples.

There was no impairment recognized as a result of the Company’s annual impairment testing in September 2003. As a result of the potential impact of the Medicare Prescription Drug

28

Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, which was enacted in December 2003, the Company performed an impairment test of goodwill at December 31, 2003 and concluded that the carrying value of goodwill did not exceed its fair value. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, no events occurred that would require goodwill to be tested for impairment.

     Self Insurance. Self-insurance accruals primarily represent management’s loss estimate for self-insurance or large deductible risks associated with workers’ compensation insurance. The Company is insured for workers’ compensation, but retains the first $250,000 of risk exposure for each claim. The Company is not maintaining annual aggregate stop loss coverage for claims made in 2004 and did not maintain annual aggregate stop loss coverage for claims made in 2003 or 2002, as such coverage was not available. Judgments used in determining the accruals related to workers’ compensation include loss development factors, frequency of claims and severity of claims. The Company’s liability includes known claims and an estimate of claims incurred but not yet reported. The liability for estimated workers’ compensation claims totaled approximately $3.2 million and $2.9 million as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The Company utilizes analyses prepared by its third-party administrator based on historical claims information to support the required reserve and related expense associated with workers’ compensation. The Company records claims expense by plan year based on the lesser of the aggregate stop loss (if applicable) or the developed losses as calculated by its third-party administrator.

The Company is also self-insured for health insurance for substantially all employees for the first $150,000 on a per person, per year basis and maintained annual aggregate stop loss coverage of $13.3 million for 2004. The health insurance policies are limited to maximum lifetime reimbursements of $2.0 million per person for 2004 and 2003 and had unlimited lifetime reimbursements for 2001. The estimated liability for health insurance claims totaled approximately $1.7 million and $2.0 million as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The Company reviews health insurance trends and payment history and maintains an accrual for incurred unpaid reported claims and for incurred but not reported claims based upon its assessment of lag time in reporting and paying claims. Judgments include assessing historical paid claims, average lags between the claims’ incurred dates, reported dates and paid dates, the frequency of claims and the severity of claims.

The Company is required to maintain cash collateral accounts with the insurance companies related to its self-insurance obligations. The Company currently maintains cash collateral balances of $4.6 million related to its self-insured obligations, which is included in other assets.

Management continually analyzes its accrued liabilities for incurred but not reported claims, and for reported but not paid claims related to its self-insurance programs and believes these accruals to be adequate. However, significant judgment is involved in assessing these accruals, and the Company is at risk for differences between actual settlement amounts and recorded accruals, and any resulting adjustments are included in expense once a probable amount is known.

29

Results of Operations

The Company reports its revenues as follows: (i) sales and related services and (ii) rentals and other revenues. Sales and related services revenues are derived from the provision of infusion therapies; the sale of home health care equipment and supplies; the sale of aerosol and respiratory therapy medications and equipment; and supplies and services related to the delivery of these products. Rentals and other revenues are derived from the rental of home health care equipment, enteral pumps and equipment related to the provision of respiratory therapies. Cost of sales and related services includes the cost of equipment, drugs and related supplies sold to patients. Cost of rentals and other revenues includes the costs of oxygen and rental supplies, demurrage for leased oxygen tanks, rent expense for leased equipment, and rental equipment depreciation expense, and excludes delivery expenses and salaries associated with the rental set-up. Operating expenses include operating center labor costs, delivery expenses, division and area management expenses, selling costs, occupancy costs, billing center costs, bad debt expense, and other operating costs. General and administrative expenses include corporate and senior management expenses.

Some of the Company’s operations are conducted through joint ventures with hospitals. The majority of the Company’s hospital joint ventures are not consolidated for financial statement reporting purposes. Earnings from hospital joint ventures represent the Company’s equity in earnings from unconsolidated hospital joint ventures and management and administrative fees from unconsolidated hospital joint ventures.

     Reorganization Items. The Company has incurred reorganization expenses as a result of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code. In accordance with the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Statement of Position 90-7, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization Under the Bankruptcy Code” (“SOP 90-7”), all revenues, expenses, realized gains and losses, and provisions for losses and expenses resulting from the reorganization are reported separately as Reorganization Items. These items include, but are not limited to, professional fees and other expenses incurred related to the Chapter 11 proceedings, write-off of deferred financing costs, and provision for damages from future lease rejections.

30

The following table and discussion sets forth items from the Company’s interim condensed consolidated statements of income as a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:

Percentage of Revenues

31

Three Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2003

Revenues. Revenues increased from $82.9 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to $83.3 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $0.4 million, or 0.5%. Effective January 1, 2004, Medicare reduced the reimbursement rate for inhalation drugs by approximately $1.8 million. The increase in revenues is a result of the Company’s sales and marketing efforts. Following is a discussion of the components of revenues:

Sales and Related Services Revenues. Sales and related services revenues decreased from $36.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to $35.7 million for the same period of 2004, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 1.4%. Without the inhalation drug reimbursement reduction, sales and related services revenues would have increased $1.3 million, or 3.6%, compared to prior year.

Rentals and Other Revenues. Rentals and other revenues increased from $46.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to $47.6 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $0.9 million, or 1.9%.

Cost of Sales and Related Services. Cost of sales and related services increased from $17.4 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to $17.8 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $0.4 million, or 2.3%. As a percentage of sales and related services revenues, cost of sales and related services increased from 48.2% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to 50.0% for the same period in 2004. This increase is primarily attributable to lower gross margins on the Company’s inhalation drug sales in the current quarter, due to lower reimbursements as a result of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003.

Cost of Rentals and Other Revenues. Cost of rentals and other revenues increased from $9.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to $9.8 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $0.8 million, or 8.9%. This increase is primarily attributable to a higher level of purchases of oxygen and rental supplies associated with the Company’s growth in rental revenue. As a percentage of rentals and other revenue, cost of rentals and other revenues increased from 19.2% for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to 20.6% for the same period in 2004.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses remained unchanged at $46.0 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2003 and 2004. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses decreased from 55.5% to 55.2% for the quarters ended June 30, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Bad debt expense increased from $2.2 million, or 2.7% of revenues, for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to $3.7 million, or 4.4% of revenues, for the same period in 2004. Bad debt expense in the current quarter has been impacted by disruptions in cash collections resulting from the inability of certain third-party payors to effectively process electronic claims due to the implementation of the new HIPAA Transaction and Code Sets. Also impacting bad debt expense has been payment delays associated with certain state Medicaid programs changing the intermediary contracted by the state to process claims submitted by the providers. The resulting delay has increased accounts receivable reserves as the related receivables balances age.

32

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased from $4.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to $4.2 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $0.1 million, or 2.4%. This increase is primarily the result of costs of lobbying efforts aimed at addressing the Medicare patient drug availability issues created by the inhalation drug reimbursement reductions scheduled for January 1, 2005. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses were 5.0% and 5.1% for the quarters ended June 30, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

Earnings from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. Earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures remained unchanged at $1.2 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2003 and 2004.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation (excluding rental equipment) and amortization expenses remained unchanged at $0.8 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2003 and 2004.

Interest Expense (Income), Net. Interest expense (income), net increased from $0.1 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 to $4.7 million for the same period in 2004. This change is attributable to the Company resuming its obligation to record interest expense as a result of its emergence from bankruptcy protection on July 1, 2003. Post-petition interest excluded from the statements of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2003, of $6.2 million, represents the default rate of interest pursuant to the terms described in the Amended Credit Agreement.

Other (Income) Expense, Net. Other (income) expense, net primarily relates to investment losses or gains associated with collateral interest in split dollar life insurance policies. Income of less than $0.1 million was recorded for the quarter ended June 30, 2004.

Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes was $0.1 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2003 and 2004.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2003

Revenues. Revenues increased from $165.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $168.1 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $2.7 million, or 1.6%. Effective January 1, 2004, Medicare reduced the reimbursement rate for inhalation drugs by approximately 15.8%, which reduced revenues in the first six months of 2004 by approximately $3.7 million. The increase in revenues is a result of the Company’s sales and marketing efforts. Following is a discussion of the components of revenues:

Sales and Related Services Revenues. Sales and related services revenues remained unchanged at $72.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2004. Without the inhalation drug reimbursement reduction, sales and related services revenues would have increased $3.7 million, or 5.1%, compared to prior year.

Rentals and Other Revenues. Rentals and other revenues increased from $92.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $95.5 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $2.7 million, or 2.9%.

Cost of Sales and Related Services. Cost of sales and related services increased from $34.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $36.5 million for the same period in 2004, an

33

increase of $1.8 million, or 5.2%. As a percentage of sales and related services revenues, cost of sales and related services increased from 47.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to 50.2% for the same period in 2004. This increase is primarily attributable to lower gross margins on the Company’s inhalation drug sales in the current year, due to lower reimbursements as a result of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003.

Cost of Rentals and Other Revenues. Cost of rentals and other revenues increased from $17.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $19.1 million for the same period in 2004, an increase of $1.7 million, or 9.8%. This increase is primarily attributable to a higher level of purchases of oxygen and rental supplies associated with the Company’s growth in rental revenue. As a percentage of rentals and other revenue, cost of rentals and other revenues were 18.8% and 20.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses decreased from $93.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $93.1 million for the same period in 2004, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 0.2%. As a percentage of revenues, operating expenses were 56.4% and 55.4% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Bad debt expense increased from $5.3 million, or 3.2% of revenues, for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $6.5 million, or 3.9% of revenues, for the same period in 2004. Bad debt expense in the current year has been impacted by disruptions in cash collections resulting from the inability of certain third-party payors to effectively process electronic claims due to the implementation of the new HIPAA Transaction and Code Sets. Also impacting bad debt expense has been payment delays associated with certain state Medicaid programs changing the intermediary contracted by the state to process claims submitted by the providers. The resulting delay has increased accounts receivable reserves as the related receivables balances age.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses decreased from $8.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $8.5 million for the same period in 2004, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 2.3%. This decrease is primarily the result of a lower level of professional services fees related to the Company’s annual financial statement audits. As a percentage of revenues, general and administrative expenses were 5.2% and 5.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2004, respectively.

Earnings from Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. Earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures decreased slightly from $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation (excluding rental equipment) and amortization expenses decreased from $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $1.6 million for the same period in 2004, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 11.1%. This decrease primarily is attributable to certain property and equipment becoming fully depreciated.

Interest Expense (Income), Net. Interest expense (income), net increased from $(0.1) million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $9.3 million for the same period in 2004. This change is attributable to the Company resuming its obligation to record interest expense as a result of its emergence from bankruptcy protection on July 1, 2003. Post-petition interest excluded from the statements of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2003, of $12.5 million, represents the default rate of interest pursuant to the terms described in the Amended Credit Agreement.

34

Other (Income) Expense, Net. Other (income) expense, net primarily relates to investment losses or gains associated with collateral interest in split dollar life insurance policies. Expense of $0.1 million was recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to income of less than $0.1 million for the same period in 2004.

Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes remained unchanged at $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2004.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2004, the Company had current assets of $79.1 million and current liabilities of $57.9 million, resulting in working capital of $21.2 million and current ratio of 1.4x as compared to a working capital of $20.1 million and a current ratio of 1.3x at December 31, 2003.

On July 31, 2002, the Company filed for bankruptcy due to its inability to pay significant debt maturities due in December 2002. On July 1, 2003, American HomePatient, Inc. and 24 of its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) emerged from bankruptcy pursuant to a 100% pay plan (the “Approved Plan”) whereby shareholders retained their equity interest and creditors and vendors will be paid 100% of all amounts they are owed, either immediately or over time with interest.

The Approved Plan provides for the treatment of all of the claims subject to compromise in the bankruptcy filing. The Approved Plan provides for the extension of the maturity on the debt to the Lenders, a reduction of the related interest cost on such debt, and the payment of all of the Company’s reported liabilities. The Lenders retained their liens on substantially all of the assets of the Company.

Pursuant to the Approved Plan, the Company’s secured debt to the Lenders is $250.0 million and is evidenced by a promissory note in that amount and is secured by various security agreements. To the Company’s knowledge, the Lenders have not executed the agreements as of the date of this filing. The Company is no longer a party to a credit agreement. The remainder of the amounts due to the Lenders at July 1, 2003 over and above the $250 million is treated as unsecured debt.

The Approved Plan provides that principal is payable annually on the $250.0 million secured debt on March 31 of each year, beginning March 31, 2005, in the amount of one-third of the Company’s Excess Cash Flow (defined in the Approved Plan as cash in excess of $7.0 million at the end of each fiscal year) for the previous fiscal year. In addition, an estimated prepayment is due on September 30, 2004 in an amount equal to one-half of the anticipated Excess Cash Flow payment due on March 31, 2005. After the unsecured debt of the Lenders and the general unsecured debt is paid in full, 100% of the Company’s Excess Cash Flow is paid as a principal payment on the $250.0 million secured debt on March 31 of each year, with an estimated prepayment due on each previous September 30 in an amount equal to one-half of the anticipated March payment. The maturity date of the $250.0 million secured debt is July 1, 2009. The Approved Plan provides that interest is payable monthly on the $250.0 million secured debt at a rate of 6.785% per annum.

The Approved Plan treats the general unsecured debt and the Lenders’ unsecured debt in the same manner. Principal and accrued interest is payable semi-annually (on June 30 and December

35

31 of each year) in six equal installments beginning December 31, 2003. Interest accrues on this unsecured debt at an annual rate of 8.3675%. In addition to the six scheduled payments, the holders of the unsecured debt also received an estimated prepayment of the Pro Rata Payment (as defined in the Approved Plan) on September 30, 2003. Because the Company did not have Excess Cash Flow for fiscal year 2003 (as defined by the Approved Plan), there was no Pro Rata Payment due on March 31, 2004. The Pro Rata Payment due on March 31, 2005 is in the amount of two-thirds of the Company’s Excess Cash Flow, if any, for the 2004 fiscal year. Additionally, an estimated prepayment is due on September 30, 2004 in an amount equal to one-half of the anticipated March 2005 Pro Rata Payment.

The Company has made all payments due as of June 30, 2004 under the Approved Plan, and has also prepaid some of its obligations thereunder. As of June 30, 2004, the Lenders were owed approximately $256.0 million, comprised of $250.0 million of secured debt and $6.0 million of unsecured debt. The remaining general unsecured claims (excluding the Government Settlement) as of June 30, 2004 were approximately $3.6 million. The Company plans to pay an additional $0.3 million to the holders of general unsecured claims subsequent to June 30, 2004 to correct an error in the allocation of a prior payment.

The Company’s funding of day-to-day operations going forward and all payments required under the Approved Plan will rely on cash flow and cash on hand as it has since the Lenders terminated the Company’s ability to access a revolving line of credit in 2000. At June 30, 2004 the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $3.6 million.

The Company’s principal cash requirements are for working capital, capital expenditures and debt service. The Company has met and intends to continue to meet these requirements with existing cash balances, net cash provided by operations and other available capital expenditure financing vehicles. Management’s goal is to generate cash sufficient to meet these requirements by increasing profitable revenues, decreasing and controlling expenses, increasing productivity, and improving accounts receivable collections.

Management believes that the Company can operate on its existing cash and cash flow and make all payments provided for in the Approved Plan through June 30, 2005. The Medicare reimbursement reductions that became effective January 2004 impacted the Company’s profitability and ability to improve its liquidity and capital resources as compared to 2003. The adverse impact that the scheduled 2005 reimbursement reductions will have on the Company’s future operating results and financial condition will be material in 2005 and beyond. The magnitude of this impact will depend upon the success of the Company’s efforts to grow revenues, improve productivity, and reduce costs. It also will depend upon final resolution of lobbying efforts to modify the pricing changes. See “Trends, Events, and Uncertainties — Reimbursement Changes and the Company’s Response” and “Risk Factors – Medicare Reimbursement Reductions.” There can be no guarantee that existing cash and cash flow will be sufficient and there can be no assurance that in such event the Company will be able to obtain additional funds from other sources on terms acceptable to the Company or at all.

The Company’s future liquidity will continue to be dependent upon the relative amounts of current assets (principally cash, accounts receivable and inventories) and current liabilities (principally accounts payable and accrued expenses). In that regard, accounts receivable can have a significant impact on the Company’s liquidity. The Company has various types of accounts receivable, such as

36

receivables from patients, contracts, and former owners of acquisitions. The majority of the Company’s accounts receivable are patient receivables. Accounts receivable are generally outstanding for longer periods of time in the health care industry than many other industries because of requirements to provide third-party payors with additional information subsequent to billing and the time required by such payors to process claims. Certain accounts receivable frequently are outstanding for more than 90 days, particularly where the account receivable relates to services for a patient receiving a new medical therapy or covered by private insurance or Medicaid. Net patient accounts receivable were $55.6 million and $56.9 million at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Average days’ sales in accounts receivable (“DSO”) was approximately 63 and 60 days at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The Company calculates DSO by dividing the previous 90 days of revenue (excluding dispositions and acquisitions), net of bad debt expense into net patient accounts receivable and multiplying the ratio by 90 days. The Company’s level of DSO and net patient receivables is affected by the extended time required to obtain necessary billing documentation.

The Company’s future liquidity and capital resources will be materially adversely impacted by the Medicare reimbursement reductions contained in the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003. See “Trends, Events, and Uncertainties - Reimbursement changes and the Company’s response.”

Net cash provided by operating activities was $18.2 million and $18.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. Net income decreased from $8.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. This decrease of $6.9 million is primarily the result of increased interest expense. Net cash used by reorganization items totaled $0.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Reorganization items consist primarily of professional fees. Net cash used in investing activities was $10.9 million and $11.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Additions to property and equipment, net were $14.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to $13.8 million for the same period in 2003. Net cash used in financing activities was $6.3 million and $8.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The cash used in financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2004 primarily relates to principal payments to the Lenders of $5.2 million. At June 30, 2004 the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $3.6 million.

37

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

The following is a tabular disclosure of all contractual obligations and commitments, including all off-balance sheet arrangements of the Company as of June 30, 2004:

In addition to the scheduled cash payments above, the Company is obligated to make Excess Cash Flow payments on the Lenders’ secured and unsecured debt as well as the pre-petition accounts payable as defined by the Approved Plan. Excess Cash Flow is defined in the Approved Plan as cash in excess of $7.0 million at the end of each fiscal year. As these payments will be based on Excess Cash Flow at future dates, the Company is not able to project the amounts of these payments. As such, the $250.0 million secured debt, which is all classified in the Year 5 and thereafter column per the table above, will require principal payments in Years 2, 3, and 4 if the Company’s cash balance exceeds $7.0 million at each year end. In addition, the Approved Plan allows the Company to make prepayments, which would reduce and be a credit against any subsequent mandatory payments. The operating lease obligations presented is based on information available as of June 30, 2004.

Long-term debt is comprised primarily of amounts owed to the Lenders. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Capital leases consist primarily of leases of office equipment.

Operating leases are noncancelable leases on certain vehicles, buildings and equipment.

The OIG Settlement represents the settlement regarding the alleged billing improprieties by the Company during the period from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 1998. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Government Regulation – Enforcement Activities.”

38

At June 30, 2004, the Company has no commitments or guarantees outstanding.

At June 30, 2004, the Company has letters of credit in place totaling $650,000 securing obligations with respect to the Company’s professional liability insurance. The letters of credit expire in January 2005.

Risk Factors

This section summarizes certain risks, among others, that should be considered by stockholders and prospective investors in the Company. Many of these risks are also discussed in other sections of this report.

     Medicare Reimbursement Reductions. In the last quarter of 2003, Congress enacted the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “Act”). The Act reduces Medicare reimbursement levels for a variety of the Company’s products and services, with some reductions beginning in January 2004 and others beginning in January 2005. These reductions will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s revenues, net income, cash flows and capital resources. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Reimbursement Changes and the Company’s Response.”

     Dependence on Reimbursement by Third-Party Payors. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, the percentage of the Company’s revenues derived from Medicare, Medicaid and private pay was 53%, 9% and 38%, respectively. The revenues and profitability of the Company may be impacted by the efforts of payors to contain or reduce the costs of health care by lowering reimbursement rates, narrowing the scope of covered services, increasing case management review of services and negotiating reduced contract pricing. Reductions in reimbursement levels under Medicare, Medicaid or private pay programs and any changes in applicable government regulations could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s revenues and net income. Changes in the mix of the Company’s patients among Medicare, Medicaid and private pay categories and among different types of private pay sources may also affect the Company’s revenues and profitability. There can be no assurance that the Company will continue to maintain its current payor or revenue mix. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

     Substantial Leverage. The Company maintains a significant amount of debt. The secured claim of the Lenders as of June 30, 2004 was $250.0 million. The unsecured claim of the Lenders as of June 30, 2004 was approximately $6.0 million. The amount of general unsecured debt (excluding the Government Settlement) due to other creditors at June 30, 2004 was $3.6 million. Required payments to the Lenders and general unsecured creditors are detailed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.” Due to the amount of debt, a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations will be dedicated to servicing debt. The substantial leverage could adversely affect the Company’s ability to grow its business or to withstand adverse economic conditions or competitive pressures and the inability to pay debt would have a material adverse effect on the Company. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

39

     Bankruptcy Appeal. On July 1, 2003, the Approved Plan became effective and the Company successfully emerged from bankruptcy protection. The Lenders filed an appeal of the order confirming the Approved Plan to the United States District Court. That court affirmed the order confirming the Approved Plan on September 12, 2003. On October 14, 2003, the Lenders filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Case Number 03-6500. That appeal is pending. If the Lenders’ appeal is successful, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company. See Note 2 to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements “Proceedings under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

     Warrant Rejection Appeal. The Bankruptcy Court issued an opinion ruling in favor of the Company’s request to reject the warrants originally issued to the Company’s Lenders to purchase 3,265,315 shares of the Company’s common stock for $.01 per share. As a result of the ruling, the warrants, which represented approximately 20% of the Company’s outstanding common stock, were rejected by the Company. The Bankruptcy Court determined the damages stemming from rejection of the warrants were $846,000, which is payable by the Company to the warrant holders as an unsecured debt. The warrant holders have appealed the damages calculation determined in this ruling. If the warrant holders’ appeal is successful, the amount owed to the warrant holders could substantially increase, which could materially adversely affect the Company’s cash flow and results from operations. See Note 2 to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements “Proceedings under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

     Government Regulation. The Company is subject to extensive and frequently changing federal, state and local regulation. In addition, new laws and regulations are adopted periodically to regulate products and services in the health care industry. Changes in laws or regulations or new interpretations of existing laws or regulations can have a dramatic effect on operating methods, costs and reimbursement amounts provided by government and other third-party payors. There can be no assurance that the Company is in compliance with all applicable existing laws and regulations or that the Company will be able to comply with any new laws or regulations that may be enacted in the future. Changes in applicable laws, any failure by the Company to comply with existing or future laws, regulations or standards, or discovery of past regulatory noncompliance by the Company could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, business or prospects. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Government Regulation.”

     Collectibility of Accounts Receivable. The Company has substantial accounts receivable, representing DSO of 63 and 60 days as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. No assurances can be given that future bad debt expense will not increase above current operating levels as a result of difficulties associated with the Company’s billing activities and meeting payor documentation requirements and claim submission deadlines. Increased bad debt expense or delays in collecting accounts receivable could have a material adverse effect on cash flows and results of operations. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies – Revenue Recognition and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts.”

40

     Health Care Initiatives. The health care industry continues to undergo dramatic changes influenced in large part by federal legislative initiatives. New federal health care initiatives likely will continue to arise. There can be no assurance that these or other federal legislative and regulatory initiatives will not be adopted in the future. One or more of these initiatives could limit patient access to, or the Company’s reimbursement for, products and services provided by the Company. Some states are adopting health care programs and initiatives as a replacement for Medicaid. There can be no assurance that the adoption of such legislation or other changes in the administration or interpretation of government health care programs or initiatives will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.

     Role of Managed Care. As managed care plays an increasingly significant role in markets in which the Company operates, the Company’s success will, in part, depend on retaining and obtaining profitable managed care contracts. There can be no assurance that the Company will retain or obtain such managed care contracts. In addition, reimbursement rates under managed care contracts are likely to continue to experience downward pressure as a result of payors’ efforts to contain or reduce the costs of health care by increasing case management review of services, retrospective payment audits, and negotiating reduced contract pricing. Therefore, even if the Company is successful in retaining and obtaining managed care contracts, it will experience declining profitability, unless the Company also decreases its cost for providing services and increases higher margin services.

     Liquidity. Trading of the Company’s common stock under its current trading symbol, AHOM or AHOM.OB, is conducted on the over-the-counter bulletin board which may limit the Company’s ability to raise additional capital and the ability of shareholders to sell their shares.

     HIPAA Compliance. HIPAA has mandated an extensive set of regulations to protect the privacy of individually identifiable health information. The regulations consist of three sets of standards, each with a different date for required compliance: (1) Privacy Standards had a compliance date of April 14, 2003; (2) Transactions and Code Sets Standards required compliance by October 16, 2002, except as extended by one year to October 16, 2003 for providers that filed a compliance extension form by October 15, 2002; and (3) Security Standards which were published in final form on February 2, 2003 and have a compliance date of April 21, 2005. The Company has filed its compliance extension form and is actively pursuing its strategies toward compliance with the final Privacy Standards and Transaction and Code Sets Standards. The Company’s HIPAA compliance plan will require modifications to existing information management systems and physical security mechanisms, and may require additional personnel as well as extensive training of existing personnel, the full cost of which has not yet been determined. The Company cannot predict the impact that final regulations, when fully implemented, will have on its operations. The Company’s implementation of mandated HIPAA Transaction and Code Sets has resulted in disruptions to cash collections, and additional disruptions may occur in the future. Further, the Company cannot predict whether all payors and clearinghouses will be fully HIPAA Transaction compliant and able to process electronic claims by the final implementation deadline. Alternative methods of claims submission may be required, possibly resulting in delay in payment, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s result of operations, cash flow, and financial condition.

41

     Ability to Attract and Retain Management. The Company is highly dependent upon its senior management, and competition for qualified management personnel is intense. The Company’s chief financial officer has announced her retirement, effective September 30, 2004, and the Company is engaged in a search for a new CFO. The Company’s historical financial results and reimbursement environment, among other factors, may limit the Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, which in turn could adversely affect profitability.

     Competition. The home health care market is highly fragmented and competition varies significantly from market to market. In the small and mid-size markets in which the Company primarily operates, the majority of its competition comes from local independent operators or hospital-based facilities, whose primary competitive advantage is market familiarity. There are relatively few barriers to entry in the local markets served by the Company, and it encounters substantial competition from new market entrants. In the larger markets, regional and national providers account for a significant portion of competition. Some of the Company’s present and potential competitors are significantly larger than the Company and have, or may obtain, greater financial and marketing resources than the Company.

     Liability and Adequacy of Insurance. The provision of healthcare services entails an inherent risk of liability. Certain participants in the home healthcare industry may be subject to lawsuits that may involve large claims and significant defense costs. It is expected that the Company periodically will be subject to such suits as a result of the nature of its business. The Company currently maintains product and professional liability insurance intended to cover such claims in amounts which management believes are in keeping with industry standards. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain liability insurance coverage in the future on acceptable terms, if at all. There can be no assurance that claims in excess of the Company’s insurance coverage will not arise. A successful claim against the Company in excess of the Company’s insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect upon the results of operations, financial condition or prospects of the Company. Claims against the Company, regardless of their merit or eventual outcome, may also have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s ability to attract patients or to expand its business. In addition, the Company is self-insured for its workers’ compensation insurance and employee health insurance and is at risk for claims up to individual stop loss and aggregate stop loss amounts.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, revised December 2003, (“FIN 46R”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities”, which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R replaced FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidations of Variable Interest Entities”, which was issued in January 2003. The Company was required to apply FIN 46R to variable interests in variable interest entities (“VIEs”).

The adoption of FIN 46R did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as none of the existing VIEs needed to be consolidated by the Company.

42

FASB Statement No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity”, was issued in May 2003. This Statement established standards for the classification and measurement of certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The Statement also includes required disclosures for financial instruments within its scope. For the Company, the Statement was effective for instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and otherwise was effective as of January 1, 2004, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments. For certain manditorily redeemable financial instruments, the Statement will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2005. The effective date has been deferred indefinitely for certain other types of manditorily redeemable financial instruments. Adoption of FASB Statement No. 150 did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as the Company currently does not have any financial instruments that are within the scope of this Statement.

43

ITEM 3 - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is not subject to material interest rate sensitivity since the Approved Plan provides for a fixed interest rate for both the $250 million secured debt and the Company’s unsecured debt. Interest expense associated with other debts would not materially impact the Company as most interest rates are fixed. The Company does not own and is not a party to any material market risk sensitive instruments.

We have not experienced large increases in either the cost of supplies or operating expenses due to inflation. With reductions in reimbursement by government and private medical insurance programs and pressure to contain the costs of such programs, we bear the risk that reimbursement rates set by such programs will not keep pace with inflation.

ITEM 4 – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

In an effort to ensure that the information the Company must disclose in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as of June 30, 2004. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of June 30, 2004, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting them to information relating to the Company required to be disclosed in the Company’s periodic reports filed with the SEC. There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the six months ended June 30, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

44

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
American HomePatient, Inc.:

We have reviewed the accompanying interim condensed consolidated balance sheet of American HomePatient, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2004, the related interim condensed consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, and the related interim condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the interim condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

KPMG LLP          

Nashville, Tennessee
August 4, 2004

45

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

A description of the Chapter 11 Cases is set forth in Note 2 to the Company’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Report and is incorporated herein by reference. All of the civil legal proceedings against the Company were stayed by the Bankruptcy Filing. A summary of the Company’s material legal proceedings that existed as of the Bankruptcy Filing is set forth in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Government Regulation – Legal Proceedings.”

ITEM 4 – SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

The 2004 annual meeting of shareholders was held on June 2, 2004. At the meeting, the re-election of the individuals nominated as Class 1 directors of the Company’s Board of Directors, Henry T. Blackstock and W. Wayne Woody, was approved. Continuing directors consisted of: Class 2 director Joseph F. Furlong, III, and Class 3 director Donald R. Millard. No other matters were voted upon at the annual meeting.

The following table sets forth the voting tabulation for the matter voted upon at the meeting:

46

ITEM 6 - EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(A)		Exhibits. The exhibits filed as part of this Report are listed on the Index to Exhibits immediately following the signature page.
(B)		Reports on Form 8-K. The Company filed the following reports on Form 8-K during the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004:

1)		A current report on Form 8-K was filed on May 5, 2004 to disclose, under Item 12, the Company’s press release describing the Company’s results of operations for the first quarter ended March 31, 2004.
2)		A current report on Form 8-K was filed on May 18, 2004 to disclose, under Item 5, the Company’s press release announcing that the Company’s chief financial officer is planning to retire.
3)		A current report on Form 8-K was filed on June 7, 2004 to disclose, under Item 5, the Company’s press release announcing that William C. O’Neil, Jr. has been appointed to the Company’s board of directors.

47

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

48

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

49

50