UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 0-15829
FIRST CHARTER CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
North Carolina (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
56-1355866 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
10200 David Taylor Drive, Charlotte, NC (Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
28262-2373 (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (704) 688-4300
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No o
As of May 5, 2004 the Registrant had outstanding 29,753,992 shares of Common Stock, no par value.
First Charter Corporation
Form 10-Q for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2004
INDEX
Page | ||||||
Part I | Item 1. | Financial Statements: | ||||
Financial Information |
Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 | 2 | ||||
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 | 3 | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 | 4 | |||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 | 5 | |||||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | 6 | |||||
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 17 | ||||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 41 | ||||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 41 | ||||
Part II | ||||||
Other Information | Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 41 | |||
Item 2. | Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 41 | ||||
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 42 | ||||
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 42 | ||||
Item 5. | Other Information | 42 | ||||
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 42 | ||||
Signature | 44 |
PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
First Charter Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Balance Sheets
March 31 | December 31 | |||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 75,040 | $ | 88,564 | ||||||||
Federal funds sold |
1,723 | 1,311 | ||||||||||
Interest bearing bank deposits |
17,951 | 23,631 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
94,714 | 113,506 | ||||||||||
Securities available for sale (cost of $1,604,576 and $1,591,803;
carrying amount of pledged collateral $1,171,550 and $1,129,474) |
1,622,967 | 1,601,900 | ||||||||||
Loans held for sale |
17,969 | 5,137 | ||||||||||
Loans |
2,280,075 | 2,252,804 | ||||||||||
Less: Unearned income |
(209 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
(25,736 | ) | (25,607 | ) | ||||||||
Loans, net |
2,254,130 | 2,227,030 | ||||||||||
Premises and equipment, net |
95,142 | 95,756 | ||||||||||
Other assets |
162,939 | 163,364 | ||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,247,861 | $ | 4,206,693 | ||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Deposits, domestic: |
||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing demand |
$ | 353,133 | $ | 326,679 | ||||||||
Interest bearing |
2,154,309 | 2,101,218 | ||||||||||
Total deposits |
2,507,442 | 2,427,897 | ||||||||||
Other borrowings |
1,377,374 | 1,432,200 | ||||||||||
Other liabilities |
54,308 | 47,157 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities |
3,939,124 | 3,907,254 | ||||||||||
Shareholders equity: |
||||||||||||
Preferred stock no par value; authorized 2,000,000 shares; no shares
issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||||||
Common stock no par value; authorized 100,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 29,748,180 and 29,720,163 shares |
115,731 | 115,270 | ||||||||||
Common stock held in Rabbi Trust for deferred compensation |
(706 | ) | (636 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred compensation payable in common stock |
706 | 636 | ||||||||||
Retained earnings |
181,747 | 178,008 | ||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale, net |
11,259 | 6,161 | ||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
308,737 | 299,439 | ||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 4,247,861 | $ | 4,206,693 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
First Charter Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
For the Three Months | |||||||||
Ended March 31 | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share data) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Interest income: |
|||||||||
Loans |
$ | 29,193 | $ | 30,291 | |||||
Federal funds sold |
3 | 5 | |||||||
Interest bearing bank deposits |
44 | 180 | |||||||
Securities |
15,990 | 14,892 | |||||||
Total interest income |
45,230 | 45,368 | |||||||
Interest expense: |
|||||||||
Deposits |
8,125 | 11,465 | |||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase |
583 | 492 | |||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank and other borrowings |
6,149 | 6,828 | |||||||
Total interest expense |
14,857 | 18,785 | |||||||
Net interest income |
30,373 | 26,583 | |||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,000 | 2,051 | |||||||
Net interest income after provision for loan losses |
27,373 | 24,532 | |||||||
Noninterest income: |
|||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
5,605 | 5,130 | |||||||
Financial management income |
1,502 | 578 | |||||||
Gain on sale of securities |
326 | 1,226 | |||||||
Gain on sale of credit card loan portfolio |
| 2,213 | |||||||
Loss from equity method investments |
(224 | ) | (100 | ) | |||||
Mortgage services income |
428 | 641 | |||||||
Brokerage services income |
970 | 486 | |||||||
Insurance services income |
3,031 | 2,437 | |||||||
Trading gains |
109 | 1,164 | |||||||
Bank owned life insurance |
850 | 946 | |||||||
Gain on sale of properties |
777 | | |||||||
Other |
1,291 | 818 | |||||||
Total noninterest income |
14,665 | 15,539 | |||||||
Noninterest expense: |
|||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
15,023 | 13,726 | |||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
4,237 | 4,166 | |||||||
Data processing |
862 | 678 | |||||||
Marketing |
1,118 | 1,153 | |||||||
Postage and supplies |
1,271 | 1,136 | |||||||
Professional services |
2,712 | 1,772 | |||||||
Telephone |
494 | 603 | |||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
118 | 85 | |||||||
Other |
2,473 | 2,714 | |||||||
Total noninterest expense |
28,308 | 26,033 | |||||||
Income before income taxes |
13,730 | 14,038 | |||||||
Income tax expense |
4,490 | 4,092 | |||||||
Net income |
$ | 9,240 | $ | 9,946 | |||||
Net income per share: |
|||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.33 | |||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.33 | |||||
Weighted average shares: |
|||||||||
Basic |
29,738,553 | 30,006,417 | |||||||
Diluted |
30,029,056 | 30,188,853 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
First Charter Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Unaudited)
Common Stock | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
held in Rabbi | Deferred | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Trust for | Compensation | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred | Payable in | Retained | Comprehensive | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) | Shares | Amount | Compensation | Common Stock | Earnings | Income | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
30,069,147 | $ | 122,870 | $ | (476 | ) | $ | 476 | $ | 185,900 | $ | 15,916 | $ | 324,686 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 9,946 | | 9,946 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized loss on securities available
for sale, net |
| | | | | (1,235 | ) | (1,235 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
8,711 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock purchased by Rabbi Trust
for deferred compensation |
| | (44 | ) | | | | (44 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation payable
in common stock |
| | | 44 | | | 44 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends |
| | | | (5,548 | ) | | (5,548 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
46,742 | 672 | | | | | 672 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock |
(125,000 | ) | (2,450 | ) | | | | | (2,450 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2003 |
29,990,889 | $ | 121,092 | $ | (520 | ) | $ | 520 | $ | 190,298 | $ | 14,681 | $ | 326,071 | ||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
29,720,163 | $ | 115,270 | $ | (636 | ) | $ | 636 | $ | 178,008 | $ | 6,161 | $ | 299,439 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | | 9,240 | | 9,240 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on securities available
for sale, net |
| | | | | 5,098 | 5,098 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
14,338 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock purchased by Rabbi Trust
for deferred compensation |
| | (70 | ) | | | | (70 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Deferred compensation payable
in common stock |
| | | 70 | | | 70 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends |
| | | | (5,501 | ) | | (5,501 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock options exercised |
28,017 | 461 | | | | | 461 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2004 |
29,748,180 | $ | 115,731 | $ | (706 | ) | $ | 706 | $ | 181,747 | $ | 11,259 | $ | 308,737 | ||||||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
First Charter Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
Three Months | ||||||||||
Ended March 31 | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 9,240 | $ | 9,946 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,000 | 2,051 | ||||||||
Depreciation |
2,250 | 2,308 | ||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
118 | 85 | ||||||||
Premium amortization and discount accretion, net |
929 | 1,138 | ||||||||
Net gain on securities available for sale transactions |
(326 | ) | (1,226 | ) | ||||||
Net (gain) loss on sale of foreclosed assets |
(45 | ) | 63 | |||||||
Net loss on sale of equipment |
1 | 62 | ||||||||
Gain on sale of credit card loan portfolio |
| (2,213 | ) | |||||||
Loss from equity method investments |
224 | 100 | ||||||||
Net gain on sale property |
(777 | ) | | |||||||
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale |
(18,903 | ) | (84,142 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale |
6,071 | 42,894 | ||||||||
Increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance |
(850 | ) | (946 | ) | ||||||
(Increase) decrease in other assets |
(2,793 | ) | 1,173 | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities |
7,151 | (44 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
5,290 | (28,751 | ) | |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale |
20,348 | 285,482 | ||||||||
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale |
115,449 | 129,971 | ||||||||
Purchase of securities available for sale |
(149,173 | ) | (612,260 | ) | ||||||
Net increase in loans and loans held for sale |
(36,703 | ) | (20,331 | ) | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of loans |
5,828 | 13,242 | ||||||||
Proceeds from sales of other real estate |
1,351 | 503 | ||||||||
Net purchases of premises and equipment |
(860 | ) | (3,181 | ) | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(43,760 | ) | (206,574 | ) | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||
Net increase in demand, money market and savings accounts |
75,934 | 148,121 | ||||||||
Net increase in certificates of deposit |
3,610 | 22,162 | ||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in securities sold under repurchase
agreements and other borrowings |
(54,826 | ) | 73,783 | |||||||
Purchase and retirement of common stock |
| (2,450 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
461 | 672 | ||||||||
Dividends paid |
(5,501 | ) | (5,548 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
19,678 | 236,740 | ||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(18,792 | ) | 1,415 | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
113,506 | 169,850 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 94,714 | $ | 171,265 | ||||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
||||||||||
Cash paid for interest |
$ | 15,836 | $ | 19,089 | ||||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
207 | 1,268 | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash transactions: |
||||||||||
Transfer of loans and premises and equipment to other real estate |
776 | 1,486 | ||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale
(net of tax effect of $3,196 and $(803), respectively) |
5,098 | (1,235 | ) | |||||||
Loans held for sale securitized and transferred to the securities available for sale portfolio |
| 128,490 | ||||||||
Allowance related to loans sold |
549 | 547 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
FIRST CHARTER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003
First Charter Corporation (the Corporation) is a regional financial services company with assets of approximately $4.2 billion and is the holding company for First Charter Bank (FCB or the Bank). FCB is a full-service bank and trust company with 54 financial centers and six insurance offices located in 17 counties throughout the piedmont and western half of North Carolina. FCB also maintains one mortgage origination office in Virginia. FCB provides businesses and individuals with a broad range of financial services, including banking, comprehensive financial planning, funds management, investments, insurance, mortgages and a full array of employee benefit programs.
Note One Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, FCB. In consolidation, all intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
The information contained in the consolidated financial statements, excluding information as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, is unaudited. The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent liabilities at the date of the financial statements, as well as the amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The information furnished in this report reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the financial condition and the results of operations for interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature. Certain amounts reported in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications have no effect on net income or shareholders equity as previously reported.
Accounting policies followed by the Corporation are presented on pages 53 to 61 of the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. With the exception of the Corporations policy regarding derivative instruments, these policies have not materially changed from the year ended December 31, 2003.
Derivative Instruments
The Corporation enters into interest rate swap agreements as business conditions warrant. These interest rate swap agreements provide an exchange of interest payments computed on notional amounts that will offset any undesirable change in fair value resulting from market rate changes on designated hedged items. A swap agreement is a contract between two parties to exchange cash flows based on specified underlying notional amounts, assets and/or indices. The interest rate swap agreements utilized by the Corporation qualify for hedge accounting as fair value hedges.
The Corporation accounts for these interest rate swaps as a hedge of the fair value of the related FHLB advances. Accordingly, the Corporation records on a quarterly basis, in noninterest income, the net change in the fair value of the interest rate swap and the related FHLB advances, provided the criteria for hedge accounting continue to be met. In the event such criteria are not met in a future period, the Corporation will only record changes in the fair value on the interest rate swap. The derivative hedging instruments are recorded at fair value in other assets or other liabilities.
Interest rate swaps assist the Corporations Asset Liability Management (ALM) process. The Corporations interest rate risk management strategy includes the use of interest rate contracts to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings that are caused by interest rate volatility. The Corporations goal is to manage interest rate sensitivity so that movements in interest rates do not significantly adversely affect net interest income. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged fixed-rate liabilities appreciate or depreciate in market value. Gains or losses on
6
the derivative instruments that are linked to the hedged fixed-rate liabilities are expected to substantially offset this unrealized appreciation or depreciation.
Interest rate contracts, which are generally non-leveraged interest rate swaps, allow the Corporation to effectively manage its interest rate risk position. Non-leveraged interest rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed-rate and variable-rate interest payments based on the contractual underlying notional amount. Exposure to loss on these contracts will increase or decrease over their respective lives as interest rates fluctuate.
Credit risk associated with derivatives is measured as the net replacement cost should the counter-parties with contracts in a gain position to the Corporation completely fail to perform under the terms of those contracts assuming no recoveries of underlying collateral. In managing derivative credit risk, both the current exposure, which is the replacement cost of contracts on the measurement date, as well as an estimate of the potential change in value of contracts over their remaining lives are considered. In managing credit risk associated with its derivative activities, the Corporation deals primarily with commercial banks, broker-dealers and corporations. To minimize credit risk, the Corporation enters into legally enforceable master netting agreements, which reduce risk by permitting the closeout and netting of transactions with the same counter-party upon the occurrence of certain events.
Accrued Taxes
The Corporation estimates tax expense based on the amount it is expected to owe various tax jurisdictions. The estimate of tax expense is reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Accrued taxes represent the net estimated amount due or to be received from taxing jurisdictions either currently or in the future and are reported as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In estimating accrued taxes, the Corporation assesses the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance in the context of the Corporations tax position.
Changes to the estimate of accrued taxes occur periodically due to changes in the tax rates, implementation of new tax planning strategies, resolution with taxing authorities of issues with previously taken tax positions and newly enacted statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance. These changes affect accrued taxes and can be material to the Corporations operating results for any particular quarter.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which addresses consolidation of variable interest entities by business enterprises. Variable interest entities are entities with equity interests that do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. An enterprise shall consolidate a variable interest entity if that enterprise has a variable interest (or combination of variable interests) that will absorb a majority of expected losses if they occur, receive a majority of the entitys residual returns if they occur, or both. The enterprise that consolidates the variable interest entity is called the primary beneficiary of that entity. Under FIN 46 an enterprise that holds significant variable interests in a variable interest entity but is not the primary beneficiary is required to disclose the nature, purpose, size, and activities of the variable interest entity, its exposure to loss as a result of the variable interest holders involvement with the entity, and the nature of its involvement with the entity and date when the involvement began. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is required to disclose the nature, purpose, size, and activities of the variable interest entity, the carrying amount and classification of consolidated assets that are collateral for the variable interest entitys obligations, and any lack of recourse by creditors (or beneficial interest holders) of a consolidated variable interest entity to the general credit of the primary beneficiary. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FIN 46 (FIN 46 R), which clarifies and interprets certain provisions of FIN 46, without changing the basic accounting model of FIN 46. The Corporation adopted the provisions of FIN 46 and FIN 46 R effective March 2004 with no material effect on its consolidated financial statements. At March 31, 2004, the Corporation did not have any significant investments in variable interest entities and had no involvement with special purpose entities.
From time to time, the FASB issues exposure drafts for proposed statements of financial accounting standards. Such exposure drafts are subject to comment from the public, to revisions by the FASB and to final issuance by the
7
FASB as statements of financial accounting standards. Management considers the effect of the proposed statements on the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation and monitors the status of changes to and proposed effective dates of exposure drafts.
Note Two Net income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the three months. Diluted net income per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if the Corporations potential common stock and contingently issuable shares, which consist of dilutive stock options and restricted stock, were issued. The numerators of the basic net income per share computations are the same as the numerators of the diluted net income per share computations for all periods presented.
A reconciliation of the basic average common shares outstanding to the diluted average common shares outstanding is as follows:
Three Months | |||||||||
Ended March 31 | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
29,738,553 | 30,006,417 | |||||||
Dilutive effect arising from
potential common stock issuances |
290,503 | 182,436 | |||||||
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
30,029,056 | 30,188,853 | |||||||
The effects of outstanding antidilutive stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share. These amounts were 845,000 shares at March 31, 2004 and 1.4 million shares for the comparable 2003 period.
The Corporation paid cash dividends of $0.185 per share for both the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
8
Note Three Business Segment Information
Refer to the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 for information with respect to the Corporations policies for defining and accounting for its segments. Financial information by segment for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:
March 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Operating | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | FCB | Segments (1) | Other (2) | Totals | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
$ | 45,190 | $ | 19 | $ | 21 | $ | 45,230 | ||||||||
Total interest expense |
14,659 | 6 | 192 | 14,857 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
30,531 | 13 | (171 | ) | 30,373 | |||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,000 | | | 3,000 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
8,552 | 6,016 | 97 | 14,665 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
22,690 | 5,572 | 46 | 28,308 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before income taxes |
13,393 | 457 | (120 | ) | 13,730 | |||||||||||
Income taxes expense (benefit) |
4,379 | 150 | (39 | ) | 4,490 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 9,014 | $ | 307 | $ | (81 | ) | $ | 9,240 | |||||||
Total loans held for sale and loans, net |
$ | 2,253,074 | $ | 19,025 | $ | | $ | 2,272,099 | ||||||||
Total assets |
4,177,763 | 46,323 | 23,775 | 4,247,861 |
March 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Operating | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | FCB | Segments (1) | Other (2) | Totals | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
$ | 45,133 | $ | 219 | $ | 16 | $ | 45,368 | ||||||||
Total interest expense |
18,664 | | 121 | 18,785 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
26,469 | 219 | (105 | ) | 26,583 | |||||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
2,051 | | | 2,051 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
11,329 | 4,216 | (6 | ) | 15,539 | |||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
21,251 | 4,750 | 32 | 26,033 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before income taxes |
14,496 | (315 | ) | (143 | ) | 14,038 | ||||||||||
Income taxes expense (benefit) |
4,226 | (92 | ) | (42 | ) | 4,092 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 10,270 | $ | (223 | ) | $ | (101 | ) | $ | 9,946 | ||||||
Total loans held for sale and loans, net |
$ | 2,049,034 | $ | 71,803 | $ | | $ | 2,120,837 | ||||||||
Total assets |
3,882,434 | 84,095 | 24,738 | 3,991,267 |
(1) | Included in Other Operating Segments are revenues, expenses and assets of insurance services, brokerage, mortgage and financial management. | |
(2) | Included in Other are revenues, expenses and assets of the parent company and eliminations. |
Note Four Acquisitions
(a) Insurance Agencies. In July and October of 2003, the Corporation acquired Piedmont Insurance Agency, Inc. and Robertson Insurance Agency, Inc, respectively. The purchase price for both agencies totaled $1.1 million in cash and were accounted for as purchases. The purchase agreements also contemplate additional cash payments based on the post-closing performance of the acquired businesses. The year over year increases in insurance services income is due to the organic growth from our insurance agencies as well as the insurance agencies and customer lists acquired. Pro forma financial information reflecting the effect of these acquisitions on periods prior to the combination is not considered material.
(b) Third Party Benefits Administrator. In July of 2003, the Corporation, through a subsidiary of FCB, purchased a third party benefits administrator in a stock transaction. The purchase price delivered at closing consisted of First Charter common stock valued at $1.32 million, and the agreement contemplates additional common stock payments based on the post closing performance of the business. The value of such additional payments, if earned, is expected to total approximately $880,000. This acquisition was accounted for as a purchase. Accordingly, the results of operations of this entity are included in the consolidated results of operations of the Corporation from the
9
date of the acquisition. Pro forma financial information reflecting the effect of this acquisition on periods prior to the combination is not considered material. Intangible assets amounted to $1.1 million from the acquisition.
Note Five Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following is a summary of the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of amortized intangible assets and the carrying amount of unamortized intangible assets as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003:
March 31 | December 31 | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying | Accumulated | Gross Carrying | Accumulated | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amortization | ||||||||||||||
Amortized intangible assets: |
||||||||||||||||||
Noncompete agreements (1) |
$ | 946 | $ | 886 | $ | 946 | $ | 861 | ||||||||||
Customer lists (1) |
1,471 | 304 | 1,471 | 236 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage servicing rights (1) |
7,083 | 5,291 | 7,083 | 4,977 | ||||||||||||||
Branch acquisitions (2) |
1,111 | 1,111 | 1,111 | 1,097 | ||||||||||||||
Other intangibles (1) (3) |
232 | 33 | 232 | 22 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 10,843 | $ | 7,625 | $ | 10,843 | $ | 7,193 | ||||||||||
Unamortized intangible assets: |
||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill (4) |
$ | 19,222 | $ | | $ | 19,222 | $ | | ||||||||||
(1) | Noncompete agreements, customer lists, mortgage servicing rights and other intangibles are recorded in the Other Operating Segments as described in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. | |
(2) | Branch acquisition intangible assets are recorded in the FCB segment as described in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. | |
(3) | Other intangibles include trade name and proprietary software. | |
(4) | Goodwill of $6,278 is recorded in the Other Operating Segments and $12,944 is recorded on FCB as described in the 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
Amortization expense, excluding amortization of mortgage servicing rights, totaled $118,000 and $85,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The following table presents the estimated amortization expense for intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and thereafter:
Noncompete | Customer | Mortgage | Branch | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Agreements | Lists | Servicing Rights | Acquisitions | Intangibles | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
$ | 85 | $ | 260 | $ | 872 | $ | 14 | $ | 42 | $ | 1,273 | ||||||||||||||
2005 |
| 226 | 442 | | 37 | 705 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2006 |
| 193 | 305 | | 32 | 530 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2007 |
| 160 | 211 | | 28 | 399 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2008 |
| 126 | 118 | | 23 | 267 | ||||||||||||||||||||
2009 and after |
| 270 | 158 | | 48 | 476 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 85 | $ | 1,235 | $ | 2,106 | $ | 14 | $ | 210 | $ | 3,650 | ||||||||||||||
Note Six Comprehensive Income
Comprehensive income includes net income and all non-owner changes to the Corporations equity. The Corporations only component of other comprehensive income is the change in unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities.
10
The Corporations total comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 was $14.3 million and $8.7 million, respectively. Information concerning the Corporations other comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 is as follows:
For the Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Before Tax Amount | Tax Effect | After Tax Amount | Before Tax Amount | Tax Effect | After Tax Amount | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses)
on securities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses)
arising during period |
$ | 8,620 | $ | 3,323 | $ | 5,297 | $ | (812 | ) | $ | (325 | ) | $ | (487 | ) | ||||||||||
Less: Reclassification for
realized gains |
326 | 127 | 199 | 1,226 | 478 | 748 | |||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized gains (losses),
net of reclassification |
$ | 8,294 | $ | 3,196 | $ | 5,098 | $ | (2,038 | ) | $ | (803 | ) | $ | (1,235 | ) | ||||||||||
Other comprehensive
income (loss) |
$ | 8,294 | $ | 3,196 | $ | 5,098 | $ | (2,038 | ) | $ | (803 | ) | $ | (1,235 | ) | ||||||||||
Note Seven Trading Activity
The Corporation engages in writing over-the-counter covered call options on specific fixed income securities in the available for sale portfolio. Under these agreements, the Corporation agrees to sell, upon election by the optionholder, a fixed income security at a fixed price. The Corporation receives a premium from the optionholder in exchange for writing the option contract. In addition, the Corporation records the write up or write down in the market value of the First Charter Option Plan Trust (the OPT Plan) as a trading gain or loss. The OPT Plan is a tax-deferred capital accumulation plan. For more information concerning the OPT Plan, see Note Fourteen of the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Corporation recognized trading gains of $0.1 million, which primarily consisted of income from the mark to market of the investments in the OPT Plan. For the three months ended March 31, 2003, the Corporation recognized trading gains of $1.2 million primarily from writing covered call options. There were no written covered call options outstanding at March 31, 2004 or at any time during the three months ended March 31, 2004. There were no written covered call options outstanding at March 31, 2003. The highest written covered call options outstanding at any time during the three months ended March 31, 2003 were $125.0 million.
Note Eight Derivatives
The Corporation utilizes interest rate swap agreements to provide an exchange of interest payments computed on notional amounts that will offset any undesirable change in fair value resulting from market rate changes on designated hedged items. A swap agreement is a contract between two parties to exchange cash flows based on specified underlying notional amounts, assets and/or indices. The interest rate swap agreements utilized by the Corporation qualify for hedge accounting as fair value hedges.
The Corporation accounts for these interest rate swaps as a hedge of the fair value of the related FHLB advances. Accordingly, the Corporation records on a quarterly basis, in noninterest income, the net change in the fair value of the interest rate swap and the related FHLB advances, provided the criteria for hedge accounting continue to be met. In the event such criteria are not met in a future period, the Corporation will only record changes in the fair value on the interest rate swap. At March 31, 2004, the derivative hedging instruments were recorded at fair value in other assets.
11
Information concerning the Corporations derivative instruments for the three months ended March 31, 2004 is as follows:
March 31, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | Gross Unrealized | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Notional | Receive | Pay | Maturity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Rate | Rate | in Years | Gains | Losses | Ineffectiveness | |||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Hedges: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swaps |
$ | 142,000 | 5.15 | % | 3.26 | % | 5.14 | $ | 1,947 | $ | | $ | (1 | ) |
According to the provisions of SFAS No. 133, the short cut method assumes that the change in the fair value of the derivative hedging instrument and the hedged debt obligation is one hundred percent correlated, which results in no ineffectiveness and no income statement effect. Of the $142.0 million aggregate notional amount of interest rate swap agreements entered into during the first quarter of 2004, one such agreement totaling $40.0 million qualifies for the short cut method assumption of no ineffectiveness; therefore, there was no impact on earnings during the three months ended March 31, 2004 from this interest rate swap agreement.
Note Nine Loans and Loans Held for Sale
The Corporations primary market area includes North Carolina, and predominately centers around the Metro region of Charlotte, North Carolina. At March 31, 2004, the majority of the total loan portfolio, as well as a substantial portion of the commercial and real estate loan portfolios, were to borrowers within this region. The diversity of the regions economic base provides a stable lending environment. No areas of significant concentrations of credit risk have been identified due to the diverse industrial base in the region.
Loans at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 were:
March 31, 2004 | December 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
$ | 749,355 | 32.8 | % | $ | 724,340 | 32.2 | % | |||||||||
Commercial non real estate |
210,010 | 9.2 | 212,010 | 9.4 | |||||||||||||
Construction |
346,109 | 15.2 | 358,217 | 15.9 | |||||||||||||
Mortgage |
288,505 | 12.7 | 280,748 | 12.5 | |||||||||||||
Consumer |
271,686 | 11.9 | 284,448 | 12.6 | |||||||||||||
Home equity |
414,410 | 18.2 | 393,041 | 17.4 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,280,075 | 100.0 | % | $ | 2,252,804 | 100.0 | % | |||||||||
Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market. Loans held for sale were $18.0 million and $5.1 million at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Loans held for sale was impacted by originations, sales activity and securitizations, which is reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Loans held for sale consists primarily of 15 and 30 year mortgages which the Corporation intends to sell as whole loans or to securitize to improve its liquidity position. No valuation allowance to reduce these loans to lower of cost or market was required at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
12
The following is a summary of the changes in the allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003:
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 25,607 | $ | 27,204 | |||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,000 | 2,051 | |||||||
Allowance related to loans sold |
(549 | ) | (547 | ) | |||||
Charge-offs |
(2,582 | ) | (2,466 | ) | |||||
Recoveries |
260 | 253 | |||||||
Net charge-offs |
(2,322 | ) | (2,213 | ) | |||||
Balance, March 31 |
$ | 25,736 | $ | 26,495 | |||||
The allowance for loan losses was $25.7 million or 1.13 percent of gross loans at March 31, 2004 compared to $25.6 million or 1.14 percent of gross loans at December 31, 2003. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans decreased primarily due to the impact of improved asset quality trends on the historical loss factors used in the loan loss migration model. In addition, the allowance for loan losses was reduced by $0.5 million due to the sale of nonaccruing and accruing higher risk mortgage loans and by net charge-offs of $2.3 million. These reductions were offset by additional provision expense of $3.0 million.
The table below summarizes the Corporations nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest as of the dates indicated.
March 31 | December 31 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 11,845 | $ | 14,910 | |||||
Other real estate owned |
6,199 | 6,836 | |||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
18,044 | 21,746 | |||||||
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing |
| 21 | |||||||
Total nonperforming assets and loans 90 days
or more past due and still accruing |
$ | 18,044 | $ | 21,767 | |||||
The recorded investment in individually impaired loans was $4.8 million (all of which were on nonaccrual status) and $4.7 million (all of which were on nonaccrual status) at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The related allowance for loan losses on these loans was $1.5 million and $0.9 million at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The average recorded investment in impaired loans for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 was $5.0 million and $20.7 million, respectively.
Note Ten Stock Repurchase Program
On January 23, 2002, the Corporations Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1.5 million shares of the Corporations common stock. As of March 31, 2004, the Corporation had repurchased a total of 1.4 million shares of its common stock at an average per-share price of $17.52 under this authorization, which has reduced shareholders equity by $24.5 million. No shares were repurchased under this authorization during the three months ended March 31, 2004.
On October 24, 2003, the Corporations Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1.5 million additional shares of the Corporations common stock. At March 31, 2004, no shares had been repurchased under this authorization.
13
Note Eleven Stock-Based Compensation
The Corporation accounts for stock-based compensation under the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The pro forma impact on net income per share as if the fair value of stock-based compensation plans had been recorded as a component of compensation expense in the consolidated financial statements as of the date of grant of awards related to such plans, pursuant to the provisions of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure an amendment to FASB Statement No. 123, is disclosed as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 9,240 | $ | 9,946 | ||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair
value based method for all awards, net of
related tax effects |
483 | 763 | ||||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 8,757 | $ | 9,183 | ||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||
Basic-as reported |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.33 | ||||||
Basic-pro forma |
$ | 0.29 | $ | 0.31 | ||||||
Diluted-as reported |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.33 | ||||||
Diluted-pro forma |
$ | 0.29 | $ | 0.30 | ||||||
The fair value of each option granted during the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
2000 Omnibus Stock Option
and Award Plan |
||||||||
Dividend yield |
3.50 | % | 4.27 | % | ||||
Risk free interest rates |
4.03 | % | 4.10 | % | ||||
Expected lives |
8 years | 10 years | ||||||
Volatility |
29 | % | 33 | % | ||||
Forfeiture rate |
2 | % | 0 | % | ||||
Director Plan |
||||||||
Dividend yield |
3.50 | % | 4.27 | % | ||||
Risk free interest rates |
4.05 | % | 3.95 | % | ||||
Expected lives |
10 years | 10 years | ||||||
Volatility |
29 | % | 33 | % | ||||
Forfeiture rate |
0.5 | % | 0 | % | ||||
1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan |
||||||||
Dividend yield |
3.50 | % | 4.27 | % | ||||
Risk free interest rates |
4.38 | % | 4.07 | % | ||||
Expected lives |
1 year | 1 year | ||||||
Volatility |
29 | % | 33 | % | ||||
Forfeiture rate |
9 | % | 0 | % |
14
Note Twelve Commitments, Contingencies and Off-Balance Sheet Risk
Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Risk. The Corporation is party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit, and involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and may require collateral from the borrower if deemed necessary by the Corporation. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party up to a stipulated amount and with specified terms and conditions. Standby letters of credit are recorded as a liability by the Corporation at the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. Commitments to extend credit are not recorded as an asset or liability by the Corporation until the instrument is exercised. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for instruments reflected in the consolidated financial statements. The creditworthiness of each customer is evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
At March 31, 2004, the Corporations exposure to credit risk was represented by preapproved but unused lines of credit totaling $331.0 million, loan commitments totaling $394.1 million and standby letters of credit aggregating $8.0 million. Of the $331.0 million of preapproved unused lines of credit, $30.1 million were at fixed rates and $300.9 million were at floating rates. Of the $394.1 million of loan commitments, $88.3 million were at fixed rates and $305.8 million were at floating rates. Of the $8.0 million of standby letters of credit, $7.9 million expire in less than one year and $0.1 million expire in one to three years. The fair value and carrying value at March 31, 2004 of standby letters of credit issued or modified during the three months ended March 31, 2004 were less than $100,000. The maximum amount of credit loss of standby letters of credit is represented by the contract amount of the instruments. Management expects that these commitments can be funded through normal operations. The amount of collateral obtained if deemed necessary by the Corporation upon extension of credit is based on managements credit evaluation of the borrower at that time. The Corporation generally extends credit on a secured basis. Collateral obtained may include, but is not be limited to, accounts receivable, inventory and commercial and residential real estate.
The Bank primarily makes commercial and installment loans to customers throughout its market area. The Corporations primary market area includes the state of North Carolina, and predominately centers on the Metro region of Charlotte, North Carolina. The real estate loan portfolio can be affected by the condition of the local real estate markets.
Contingencies. The Corporation and the Bank are defendants in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operations, liquidity or financial position of the Corporation or the Bank.
Note Thirteen Related Party Transactions
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation engages in business transactions with certain of its directors. Such transactions are competitively negotiated at arms-length by the Corporation and are not considered to include terms which are unfavorable to the Corporation.
During 2001, the Corporation decided to upgrade its service offerings to include an automatic overdraft product, which allows customers the ability to overdraw their account and have their transactions honored for a fee. During the fourth quarter of 2001, the Corporation engaged Impact Financial Services (Impact) to provide this product. Impact will receive a fee from the Corporation equal to 15 percent of the incremental income from this new product for a twenty four-month period commencing the fourth full month after the Corporation began to offer the product. John Godbold, a director of the Corporation, is the president and owner of Godbold Financial Associates, Inc. (GFA), which acts as an independent sales representative for Impact for Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina and Virginia, and as such GFA and Mr. Godbold will receive commissions from Impact based on fees earned by Impact. Management believes that the transaction was at arms-length. Pursuant to the Corporations conflict of interest policy for directors and executive officers, the members of the Corporations Board of Directors who did not
15
have a direct or indirect interest in the related party transaction, reviewed this related party transaction and determined that it was fair to the Corporation and subsequently approved and ratified the transaction. As described above, no fees were required to be paid to Impact until the fourth full month following introduction of the new product, therefore, no fees were payable to Impact and no commissions were payable to GFA and Mr. Godbold until March 2002. For the three months ended March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2003, the Corporation received revenues of approximately $1.63 million and $1.61 million, respectively, which resulted in fees of $239,000 and $236,000, respectively, to Impact and resulted in Impact paying commissions to GFA (and Mr. Godbold) of $168,000 and $166,000, respectively.
Note Fourteen Equity Method Investments
The Corporations equity method investments represent investments in venture capital limited partnerships. The Corporations recognition of earnings or losses from an equity method investment is determined by the Corporations share of the investees earnings on a quarterly basis (or, in the case of some smaller investments, on an annual basis if there has been no significant change in values). The limited partnerships generally provide their financial information during the quarter after the end of a given period, and the Corporations policy is to record its share of earnings or losses on these equity method investments in the quarter such information was received.
These limited partnerships record their investments in investee companies on a fair value basis, with changes in the underlying fair values being reflected as an adjustment to their earnings in the period such changes are determined. The earnings of these limited partnerships, and therefore the amount recorded on an equity-method basis by the Corporation, are impacted significantly by changes in the underlying value of the companies in which these limited partnerships invest. All of the companies in which these limited partnerships invest are privately held, and their market values are not readily available. Estimations of these values are made by the management of the limited partnerships and are reviewed by the Corporations management for reasonableness. The assumptions in the valuation of these investments include the viability of the business model, the ability of the investee company to obtain alternative financing, the ability to generate revenues in future periods and other subjective factors. Given the inherent risks associated with this type of investment in the current economic environment, there can be no guarantee that there will not be widely varying gains or losses on these equity method investments in future periods. If management of the limited partnerships had made different assumptions about the valuation of these investments, the Corporations financial position and results of operations could have differed materially.
At March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 the total book value of equity method investments was $2.9 million and $2.8 million, respectively, and is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Of the $2.9 million, $1.1 million represents investments in venture capital partnerships, which invest primarily in equity securities. The remaining $1.8 million is invested in Small Business Investment Companies (SBICs), which make debt investments that qualify for the investment test under the Community Reinvestment Act. At March 31, 2004, the Corporations remaining commitment to fund the equity method investments was $2.2 million and represented commitments to venture funds that are SBICs. These remaining commitments have the option of being called in 2004.
16
Item 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Factors that May Affect Future Results
The following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements about the Corporations financial condition and results of operations, which are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect managements judgment only as of the date hereof. The Corporation undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances that arise after the date hereof.
Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward looking statements include, among others, the following possibilities: (1) projected results in connection with the implementation of our business plan and strategic initiatives are lower than expected; (2) competitive pressure among financial services companies increases significantly; (3) costs or difficulties related to the integration of acquisitions or expenses in general are greater than expected; (4) general economic conditions, in the markets in which the Corporation does business, are less favorable than expected; (5) risks inherent in making loans, including repayment risks and risks associated with collateral values, are greater than expected; (6) changes in the interest rate environment reduce interest margins and affect funding sources; (7) changes in market rates and prices may adversely affect the value of financial products; (8) legislation or regulatory requirements or changes thereto adversely affect the businesses in which the Corporation is engaged; (9) regulatory compliance cost increases are greater than expected; and (10) decisions to change the business mix of the Corporation.
Overview
The Corporation is a bank holding company established as a North Carolina Corporation in 1983, with one wholly-owned banking subsidiary, FCB. The Corporations principal executive offices are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. FCB is a full service bank and trust company with 54 financial centers, six insurance offices and 93 ATMs located in 17 counties throughout the piedmont and western half of North Carolina. As of December 31, 2003, the Corporation and its subsidiaries owned 36 financial center locations, leased 18 financial center locations and leased six insurance offices. The Corporation also leases and maintains operations in an office in Reston, Virginia for the origination of real estate loans. These operations are conducted by First Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc., which also serves as a holding company for certain subsidiaries that own real estate and real estate-related assets, including first and second residential mortgage loans. In addition, the Corporation leases a facility in Winston-Salem, North Carolina for the operations of its third party benefits administrator.
The Corporations primary market area is located within North Carolina and predominately centers around the Metro region of Charlotte, North Carolina, including Mecklenburg County and its surrounding counties. Charlotte is the twenty-sixth largest city in the United States and has a diverse economic base. Primary business sectors in the Charlotte Metro region include banking and finance, insurance, manufacturing, health care, transportation, retail, telecommunications, government services and education. The Corporation believes that it is not dependent on any one or a few types of commerce due to the economic diversity of the region; however, North Carolina was one of the states hardest hit by the recent recession. Over the last two years, personal income growth in North Carolina of 4.63 percent lagged the growth of its neighbors, Georgia, 6.23 percent, and Virginia, 6.06 percent. Since the North Carolina economy has historically relied on the manufacturing and transportation sectors, it has been significantly impacted by global competition and rising energy prices. As a result, the North Carolina economy is transitioning to a more service oriented economy. Currently, the finance and insurance industries have shown the most growth. The average unemployment rate for the Charlotte Metro region was 6.6 percent for the three months ended March 2004 compared to 6.0 percent for the three months ended March 2003. This is the result of several layoffs in the manufacturing sector. The increased unemployment rates reflect the structural changes taking place in the economy of the Charlotte Metro region. The service industry is now the major employer followed by wholesale and retail trade. Other sectors have begun to emerge as significant contributors, education and health services along with the leisure and hospitality sectors. While commercial real estate lending is still not at levels seen before the recession, there has been an increase in activity. During the later half of 2003, there was some speculative development and a
17
steady stream of property acquisitions and expansions in the office, mixed use, retail and industrial sectors. For those areas suffering from the decline of manufacturing, not only is unemployment high, but there is also a large amount of textile manufacturing and warehouse space on the market.
The Corporations operations are divided into five primary lines of business: community banking, mortgage, brokerage, insurance, and financial management. Community banking provides a variety of depository accounts including interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking accounts, certificates of deposit and money market accounts. In addition, community banking offers numerous loan products including commercial, consumer, real estate and home equity loans. The community bank also maintains 93 ATMs and enables customers to access their accounts on-line. The mortgage business provides both fixed-rate and variable-rate mortgage products and loan servicing. First Charter Brokerage Services offers full service and discount brokerage services, annuity sales and financial planning services pursuant to a third party arrangement with UVEST Investment Services. First Charter Insurance Services, Inc. is a North Carolina corporation formed to meet the insurance needs of businesses and individuals throughout the Charlotte Metro region. Financial management provides comprehensive financial planning, funds management, investments and record keeping services for many companies and individuals throughout the United States.
The principal offices of the Corporation are located in the 230,000 square foot First Charter Center located at 10200 David Taylor Drive in Charlotte, North Carolina, which is owned by the Bank through its subsidiaries. The First Charter Center contains the corporate offices of the Corporation as well as all of the support departments for the Bank.
The Corporation derives interest income through traditional banking activities such as generating loans and earning interest on securities. Additional sources of income are derived from fees on deposit accounts and from our various lines of business including mortgage, brokerage, insurance and financial management. Also, as a part of the Corporations management of its securities portfolio, income is recognized on the sale of bond and equity securities.
Improving the net interest margin is critical to the Corporations strategy to grow earnings. The declining interest rate environment has continued to pressure loan yields. In addition, during 2003 the margin was impacted by lower effective yields on mortgage-backed securities due to increased amortization of premiums resulting from increased prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgages. The Corporation has recently taken steps towards improving earnings. During 2003, the Corporation restructured the securities available for sale portfolio to stabilize cash flows and improve the effective yields in the portfolio. During late 2002 and 2003, the Corporation introduced the Checking Account Marketing Program (CHAMP). This product has facilitated a shift in funding sources from higher-cost retail certificates of deposit to lower-cost transaction based accounts. In addition, in 2003 the Corporation prepaid $131 million in longer-term, fixed rate Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) advances to improve the net interest margin, which is expected to lower interest expense.
Maintaining sound asset quality is a major focus for the Corporation. As a result of this focus and initiatives taken in 2003, the Corporations asset quality profile has improved significantly. During 2003, the Corporation sold $60.9 million in nonaccruing and accruing higher risk loans to improve the asset quality of the loan portfolio and to contain the financial risk of these loans. The Corporation anticipated that significant future collections costs would be eliminated while allowing the Corporation to focus additional efforts on growing traditional banking activities and additional sources of income discussed above. Also, the Corporation sold its $11.7 million credit card portfolio in the first quarter of 2003. These changes have reduced the credit risk profile of the Corporation. Similarly, in the first quarter of 2004, $6.4 million in nonaccruing and accruing higher risk mortgage loans were sold. This is expected to have a positive impact on earnings. Nevertheless, the business of lending to commercial and consumer customers carries with it significant credit risk, which must be continually managed. Management monitors asset quality and credit risk on an ongoing basis.
The Corporation competes against other banks, savings and loan associations, savings banks, credit unions, finance companies and major retail stores that offer competing financial services. Several of these competitors have greater resources, broader geographic coverage and higher lending limits than the Corporation.
The Corporation faces the challenge of retaining existing customers and attracting new customers. The Corporations deposit market share within its market area is approximately 3 percent. This low market share gives the Corporation an advantage in attracting new customers. The Corporations primary methods of competition are to
18
provide exceptional customer service and fairly priced products. The Corporation uses a quarterly independent survey of customers to review its level of customer service. For the first quarter of 2004, customer satisfaction scores were 80 percent very satisfied, compared to the industry average of 59 percent satisfied. The Corporations customer attrition ratio was 13 percent and remains below the industry average of 23 percent, which allows for increased opportunities to expand relationships with our customers. Our main strategy for obtaining new customers is CHAMP, a disciplined proactive approach to attracting new accounts and customers. Its success has provided the Corporation with opportunities to develop new customer relationships to generate additional fee income and to shift our funding mix towards lower-cost funding sources. To meet the needs of existing and potential customers, the Corporation has upgraded five branches, opened one new branch, provided extended hours in select branches and its call center and added bilingual personnel. The Corporation will continue to update existing branches and expand into new areas as both market and economic conditions warrant.
Another challenge for the Corporation is growing fee income through other lines of business. These sources of income provide stability to our earnings with minimal credit risk and less exposure to interest rate risk than our community banks traditional lines of business. In addressing this challenge, during 2003 the Corporation acquired two insurance agencies to expand the reach of our insurance products with businesses and individuals throughout the Charlotte Metro region. In addition, the Corporation acquired a third party benefits administrator which adds new customers, expands our product line and improves our technology platform. Also, during 2003 and early 2004, First Charter Brokerage Services increased its number of licensed sales people. As a result of these actions, financial management, brokerage and insurance services income experienced strong growth in early 2004. The Corporation continuously reviews other opportunities for expansion as conditions warrant.
Financial Summary
Net income amounted to $9.2 million, or $0.31 per diluted share, for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to earnings of $9.9 million or $0.33 per diluted share for the same period in 2003. Earnings for the first quarter of 2004 included an $0.8 million ($0.5 million, or $0.02 diluted earnings per share, after-tax) gain on sale of properties, and earnings for the first quarter of 2003 included a $2.2 million ($1.6 million, or $0.05 diluted earnings per share, after-tax) gain recognized on the sale of the Corporations credit card portfolio. The Corporations primary noninterest income lines of business continue to generate strong revenue growth with financial management income up 160 percent, brokerage services income up 100 percent and insurance services income up 24 percent. In addition, the Corporation began to realize the benefits from the refinancing of fixed term advances during 2003 and the results of certain asset-liability management transactions entered into during the first quarter of 2004 as interest expense decreased $3.9 million or 21 percent. Noninterest expense increased $2.3 million primarily due to higher salaries and employee benefits and increased professional fees. Provision for loan losses increased $0.9 million due to the impact of the June 2003 problem loan sale on the historical loss ratios and allocation factors used in the allowance model. Income tax expense increased $0.4 million due to an increase in projected taxable income relative to nontaxable items.
During the first quarter of 2004, the Corporation continued to experience strong core business fundamentals in the areas of deposits and customer satisfaction that have created continued momentum for 2004. The success of CHAMP resulted in 10,258 new checking accounts being opened. In addition, during the first quarter of 2004, core retail households increased 3.4 percent to 82,702 primarily due to CHAMP. For the first quarter of 2004, customer satisfaction scores continued to surpass the Corporations threshold of 75 percent very satisfied.
19
Table One
Selected Financial Data
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||
Income statement |
||||||||
Interest income |
$ | 45,230 | $ | 45,368 | ||||
Interest expense |
14,857 | 18,785 | ||||||
Net interest income |
30,373 | 26,583 | ||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,000 | 2,051 | ||||||
Noninterest income |
14,665 | 15,539 | ||||||
Noninterest expense |
28,308 | 26,033 | ||||||
Income before income taxes |
13,730 | 14,038 | ||||||
Income tax expense |
4,490 | 4,092 | ||||||
Net income |
$ | 9,240 | $ | 9,946 | ||||
Per common share |
||||||||
Basic net income |
$ | 0.31 | $ | 0.33 | ||||
Diluted net income |
0.31 | 0.33 | ||||||
Cash dividends declared |
0.185 | 0.185 | ||||||
Period-end book value |
10.38 | 10.87 | ||||||
Average shares outstanding basic |
29,738,553 | 30,006,417 | ||||||
Average shares outstanding diluted |
30,029,056 | 30,188,853 | ||||||
Ratios |
||||||||
Return on average shareholders equity (1) |
11.91 | % | 12.06 | % | ||||
Return on average assets (1) |
0.87 | 1.06 | ||||||
Net interest margin (1) |
3.19 | 3.15 | ||||||
Average loans to average deposits |
93.31 | 88.77 | ||||||
Average equity to average assets |
7.34 | 8.77 | ||||||
Efficiency ratio (2) |
62.60 | 62.66 | ||||||
Dividend payout |
59.68 | 56.06 | ||||||
Selected period end balances |
||||||||
Securities available for sale |
$ | 1,622,967 | $ | 1,453,827 | ||||
Loans held for sale |
17,969 | 69,894 | ||||||
Loans |
2,280,075 | 2,077,637 | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses |
25,736 | 26,495 | ||||||
Total assets |
4,247,861 | 3,991,267 | ||||||
Total deposits |
2,507,442 | 2,492,929 | ||||||
Borrowings |
1,377,374 | 1,116,223 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
3,939,124 | 3,665,196 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
308,737 | 326,071 | ||||||
Selected average balances |
||||||||
Loans and loans held for sale |
2,273,575 | 2,112,226 | ||||||
Earning assets |
3,884,954 | 3,474,071 | ||||||
Total assets |
4,248,389 | 3,814,209 | ||||||
Total deposits |
2,436,673 | 2,379,454 | ||||||
Borrowings |
1,430,127 | 1,050,637 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
311,988 | 334,431 | ||||||
(1) | Annualized. | |
|
||
(2) | Noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income less gain on sale of securities. |
20
Critical Accounting Policies
The Corporations accounting policies are fundamental to understanding managements discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. The Corporation has identified the following critical accounting policies: allowance for loan losses, accrued taxes, derivative instruments and equity method investments. For more information on all of these critical accounting policies, please refer to pages 17 to 19 of the Corporations Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. An update to these policies is provided below.
Accrued Taxes
The Corporation estimates tax expense based on the amount it is expected to owe various tax jurisdictions. The estimate of tax expense is reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Accrued taxes represent the net estimated amount due or to be received from taxing jurisdictions either currently or in the future and are reported as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In estimating accrued taxes, the Corporation assesses the relative merits and risks of the appropriate tax treatment of transactions taking into account statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance in the context of the Corporations tax position.
Changes to the estimate of accrued taxes occur periodically due to changes in the tax rates, implementation of new tax planning strategies, resolution with taxing authorities of issues with previously taken tax positions and newly enacted statutory, judicial and regulatory guidance. These changes affect accrued taxes and can be material to the Corporations operating results for any particular quarter.
Derivative Instruments
The Corporation enters into interest rate swap agreements to provide an exchange of interest payments computed on notional amounts that will offset any undesirable change in fair value resulting from market rate changes on designated hedged items.
The Corporation accounts for these interest rate swaps as a hedge of the fair value of the related FHLB advances. Accordingly, the Corporation records, in noninterest income, the net change in the fair value of the interest rate swap and the related FHLB advances, provided the criteria for hedge accounting continues to be met. In the event the criteria for hedge accounting are not met in a future period, the Corporation will cease recording the change in fair value of the FHLB advances and will amortize into earnings the then carrying value of the interest rate swap over the life of the hedged item.
The Corporation formally documents at inception all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133. The Corporation will discontinue hedge accounting when it is determined that a derivative is not expected to be or has ceased to be highly effective as a hedge, and will reflect changes in fair value through the income statement. See Asset-Liability Management and Interest Rate Risk for further details regarding these interest rate swap agreements.
Earnings Performance
Net Interest Income and Margin
Net interest income, the difference between total interest income and total interest expense, is the Corporations principal source of earnings. An analysis of the Corporations net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and average balance sheets for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 is presented in Table Two. Net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis (FTE) is a non-GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) performance measure used by management in operating the business which management believes provides investors with a more accurate picture of the interest margin for comparative purposes. The changes in net interest income (on a taxable-equivalent basis) for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 are analyzed in Table Three. The discussion below is based on net interest income computed under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
21
For the three months ended March 31, 2004, net interest income amounted to $30.4 million, an increase of approximately 14.3 percent from net interest income of $26.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The increase in net interest income was mainly due to lower interest expense of $3.9 million compared to the three months ended March 31, 2003. This decrease was due to a shift in funding sources from higher cost retail certificates of deposit to lower cost transaction based accounts, the benefits from the refinancing of $50 million and $81 million of fixed-term advances in the second quarter and fourth quarter of 2003, respectively, and the results from certain asset-liability management transactions entered into during the first quarter of 2004. The increase in net interest income was partially offset by a $0.1 million decrease in interest income mainly due to lower yields on earning assets resulting from the continued effects of assets repricing downward and the low interest rate environment.
The net interest margin (tax adjusted net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets) increased 4 basis points to 3.19 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to 3.15 percent in the same 2003 period. The impact of lower rates paid on interest bearing liabilities exceeded the impact of lower yields earned on interest bearing assets. The primary objective of interest rate risk management is to minimize the effect that changes in interest rates have on the net interest margin while maintaining an appropriate interest rate risk profile.
Average interest earning assets increased $410.9 million to $3.88 billion at March 31, 2004 compared to $3.47 billion for the same 2003 period. This increase was primarily due to a $294.1 million increase in the Corporations average securities available for sale. The increase in average securities available for sale was due to securitization of $102.1 million and $56.3 million of mortgage loans held for sale in the second quarter and third quarter of 2003, respectively, as well as the net purchases of securities. Currently, the Corporations strategy is to maintain the securities available for sale portfolio at its current level, which will provide the Corporation the opportunity to reinvest the cash flows from the portfolio in higher rate investments in a rising interest rate environment. Average interest earning assets also increased as a result of growth in the Corporations average loans and loans held for sale portfolio. This increase was mainly due to growth in the construction, mortgage and home equity loan categories. The increase in average loans and loans held for sale was partially offset by the June 2003 problem loan sale of $60.9 million in nonaccruing and accruing higher risk loans, the sale of $11.7 million of credit card loans in the first quarter of 2003, and the mortgage loan securitizations.
In addition to the increase in average interest earning assets, the Corporation experienced an increase in average interest bearing liabilities. Average other borrowings increased $379.5 million compared to March 31, 2003 and were used to fund loan growth and securities purchases. In addition, average deposits increased $57.2 million from March 31, 2003. A major contributor to the decrease in interest expense was a shift in average deposits from higher-cost certificates of deposits to lower cost transaction based accounts. While certificates of deposits declined on average $121.2 million, noninterest bearing and other core deposit categories increased $178.4 million, primarily due to the continued success of CHAMP.
22
The following table includes interest income on interest earning assets and related average yields, as well as interest expense on interest bearing liabilities and related average rates paid for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003. In addition, the table includes the net interest margin. Average balances were calculated using daily balances.
Table Two
Average Balances and Net Interest Income Analysis
First Quarter 2004 | First Quarter 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Average | Interest | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Income/ | Yield/Rate | Average | Income/ | Yield/Rate | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Balance | Expense | Paid (5) | Balance | Expense | Paid (5) | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest earning assets: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans and loans held for sale(1) (2) (3) |
$ | 2,273,575 | $ | 29,291 | 5.18 | % | $ | 2,112,226 | $ | 30,458 | 5.85 | % | |||||||||||||
Securities taxable |
1,517,439 | 15,231 | 4.01 | 1,218,722 | 13,997 | 4.59 | |||||||||||||||||||
Securities nontaxable |
72,644 | 1,168 | 6.43 | 77,260 | 1,377 | 7.13 | |||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
1,398 | 3 | 0.87 | 2,207 | 5 | 0.94 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing bank deposits |
19,898 | 44 | 0.88 | 63,656 | 180 | 1.15 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total earning assets (4) |
3,884,954 | 45,737 | 4.73 | 3,474,071 | 46,017 | 5.35 | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
85,183 | 83,735 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other assets |
278,252 | 256,404 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 4,248,389 | $ | 3,814,209 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest bearing liabilities: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
789,150 | 1,230 | 0.63 | 656,553 | 1,513 | 0.93 | |||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits |
120,469 | 84 | 0.28 | 114,234 | 175 | 0.62 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other time deposits |
1,195,559 | 6,811 | 2.29 | 1,316,808 | 9,777 | 3.01 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
1,430,127 | 6,732 | 1.89 | 1,050,637 | 7,320 | 2.83 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total interest bearing liabilities |
3,535,305 | 14,857 | 1.69 | 3,138,232 | 18,785 | 2.43 | |||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing sources: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing deposits |
331,496 | 291,859 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
69,600 | 49,687 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
311,988 | 334,431 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and
shareholders equity |
$ | 4,248,389 | $ | 3,814,209 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest spread |
3.04 | 2.92 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of noninterest bearing sources |
0.15 | 0.23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income/
net interest margin |
$ | 30,880 | 3.19 | % | $ | 27,232 | 3.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||
(1) | The preceding analysis takes into consideration the principal amount of nonaccruing loans and only income actually collected and recognized on such loans. | |
(2) | Average loan balances are shown net of unearned income. | |
(3) | Includes amortization of deferred loan fees of approximately $671 and $556 for the first quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively. | |
(4) | Yields on nontaxable securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis, assuming a Federal tax rate of 35 percent, applicable state taxes and TEFRA disallowances for the first quarter of 2004 and 2003. The adjustments made to convert to a taxable-equivalent basis were $507 and $649 for the first quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively. | |
(5) | Annualized. |
23
The following table presents the changes in net interest income between the three months ended March 31, 2004 and the three months ended March 31, 2003:
Table Three
Volume and Rate Variance Analysis
March 31, 2004 versus March 31, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||
Increase (Decrease) in Net Interest Income | ||||||||||||||||||
Due to Change in Rate and Volume (1) | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Income/ | Income/ | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Expense | Rate | Volume | Expense | ||||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||||
Loans and loans held for sale (2) |
$ | 29,291 | $ | (3,370 | ) | $ | 2,203 | $ | 30,458 | |||||||||
Securities taxable |
15,231 | (1,981 | ) | 3,215 | 13,997 | |||||||||||||
Securities nontaxable (2) |
1,168 | (131 | ) | (78 | ) | 1,377 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds sold |
3 | | (2 | ) | 5 | |||||||||||||
Interest bearing bank deposits |
44 | (27 | ) | (109 | ) | 180 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
$ | 45,737 | $ | (5,509 | ) | $ | 5,229 | $ | 46,017 | |||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||||
Demand deposits |
$ | 1,230 | $ | (539 | ) | $ | 256 | $ | 1,513 | |||||||||
Savings deposits |
84 | (98 | ) | 7 | 175 | |||||||||||||
Other time deposits |
6,811 | (2,170 | ) | (796 | ) | 9,777 | ||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
6,732 | (2,803 | ) | 2,215 | 7,320 | |||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
14,857 | (5,610 | ) | 1,682 | 18,785 | |||||||||||||
Net interest income |
$ | 30,880 | $ | 101 | $ | 3,547 | $ | 27,232 | ||||||||||
(1) | The changes for each category of income and expense are divided between the portion of change attributable to the variance in rate or volume for that category. The amount of change that cannot be separated is allocated to each variance proportionately. | |
(2) | Income on nontaxable securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis. Refer to Table Two for further details. |
Noninterest Income
The major components of noninterest income are derived from service charges on deposit accounts as well as other banking products and services from our various lines of business including brokerage, mortgage, insurance and financial management. In addition, the Corporation realizes gains from the sale of fixed-income and equity securities and income from our investment in Bank Owned Life Insurance.
Noninterest income decreased $0.9 million, or 5.6 percent, to $14.7 million compared to the same period in 2003. However, the Corporations primary noninterest income lines of business exceeded the first quarter of 2003 by $2.6 million or 24 percent. This increase was primarily due to a $0.9 million increase in financial management income attributable to the acquisition of a third party benefits administrator in the third quarter of 2003, and $0.6 million increase in insurance services revenue resulting from organic growth as well as the acquisition of two insurance agencies in the third and fourth quarter of 2003. In addition, other noninterest income increased $0.5 million due to increased mortgage servicing income and lower amortization of mortgage servicing rights, brokerage services income increased $0.5 million as customers continue to return to the equities market, and service charges increased $0.5 million due to growth in checking accounts and increased activity. These increases were offset by a $3.5 million decrease in other components of noninterest income including gains on the sale of the Corporations credit card portfolio, trading income, gains on sale of securities, losses on equity investments and gains on the sale of bank property.
24
The following table compares noninterest income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003.
Table Four
Noninterest Income
Three Months | |||||||||||||||||
Ended March 31 | Increase/(Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
$ | 5,605 | $ | 5,130 | $ | 475 | 9.3 | % | |||||||||
Financial management income |
1,502 | 578 | 924 | 159.9 | |||||||||||||
Gain on sale of securities |
326 | 1,226 | (900 | ) | (73.4 | ) | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of credit card loan portfolio |
| 2,213 | (2,213 | ) | (100.0 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss from equity method investments |
(224 | ) | (100 | ) | (124 | ) | (124.0 | ) | |||||||||
Mortgage services income |
428 | 641 | (213 | ) | (33.2 | ) | |||||||||||
Brokerage services income |
970 | 486 | 484 | 99.6 | |||||||||||||
Insurance services income |
3,031 | 2,437 | 594 | 24.4 | |||||||||||||
Trading gains |
109 | 1,164 | (1,055 | ) | (90.6 | ) | |||||||||||
Bank owned life insurance |
850 | 946 | (96 | ) | (10.1 | ) | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of property |
777 | | 777 | NA | |||||||||||||
Other |
1,291 | 818 | 473 | 57.8 | |||||||||||||
Total noninterest income |
$ | 14,665 | $ | 15,539 | $ | (874 | ) | (5.6 | )% | ||||||||
Noninterest Expense
Noninterest expense is primarily comprised of operating expenses for the Corporation. The major components are salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, professional fees and other operating expenses.
Noninterest expense totaled $28.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, an increase of $2.3 million or 8.7 percent compared to the same 2003 period. Noninterest expense was impacted by a $1.3 million increase in salaries and employee benefits due to additional personnel, including the acquisition of a third party benefits administrator and two insurance agencies, increased incentive compensation accruals and lower deferred origination loan costs. In addition, noninterest expense was affected by a $0.9 million increase in professional fees including technology infrastructure administration, fees associated with the sale of $6.4 million of nonaccruing and accruing higher risk mortgage loans, consulting services to ensure compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and fees related to the collection efforts on certain residential rental property loans.
The efficiency ratio, noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income, less gain on the sale of securities, decreased slightly to 62.6 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to 62.7 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The calculation of the efficiency ratio excludes gains on sale of securities of $0.3 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The following table compares noninterest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003.
Table Five
Noninterest Expense
Three Months | |||||||||||||||||
Ended March 31 | Increase/(Decrease) | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
$ | 15,023 | $ | 13,726 | $ | 1,297 | 9.4 | % | |||||||||
Occupancy and equipment |
4,237 | 4,166 | 71 | 1.7 | |||||||||||||
Data processing |
862 | 678 | 184 | 27.1 | |||||||||||||
Marketing |
1,118 | 1,153 | (35 | ) | (3.0 | ) | |||||||||||
Postage and supplies |
1,271 | 1,136 | 135 | 11.9 | |||||||||||||
Professional services |
2,712 | 1,772 | 940 | 53.0 | |||||||||||||
Telephone |
494 | 603 | (109 | ) | (18.1 | ) | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
118 | 85 | 33 | 38.8 | |||||||||||||
Other |
2,473 | 2,714 | (241 | ) | (8.9 | ) | |||||||||||
Total noninterest expense |
$ | 28,308 | $ | 26,033 | $ | 2,275 | 8.7 | % | |||||||||
25
Income Tax Expense
Total income tax expense for the first quarter of 2004 was $4.5 million for an effective tax rate of 32.7 percent, compared to $4.1 million for an effective tax rate of 29.2 percent for the first quarter of 2003. The increase in the effective tax rate for 2004 was primarily due to an increase in projected taxable income relative to nontaxable items. Management anticipates the 2004 effective tax rate to range from 31 to 33 percent. The Corporations North Carolina tax returns for 1999, 2000 and 2001, are currently undergoing an audit by the North Carolina Department of Revenue. Management does not expect any significant, adverse impact to its results of operations arising from this examination.
Business Segments
The Corporations operations are divided into five operating segments: commercial banking, brokerage, insurance, mortgage and financial management. These segments are identified based on the Corporations organizational structure, and the Corporations chief operating decision makers review separate results of operations of each of these operating segments. For purposes of segment reporting, the Corporation has only one reportable segment, FCB, the Corporations primary banking subsidiary. FCB provides businesses and individuals with commercial loans, retail loans, and deposit banking services. Brokerage, insurance, mortgage and financial management are reported as Other Operating Segments. Of these segments, the results of operations of FCB constitute a substantial majority of the consolidated net income, revenues and assets of the Corporation, as set forth in Note Three to the consolidated financial statements. Included in Other are revenue, expenses and assets of the parent company and eliminations.
The following table compares total income for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 for FCB, Other Operating Segments and Other:
Table Six
Business Segment Net Income (Loss)
For the Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31 | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||
FCB |
$ | 9,014 | $ | 10,270 | ||||
Other Operating Segments |
307 | (223 | ) | |||||
Other |
(81 | ) | (101 | ) | ||||
Total consolidated |
$ | 9,240 | $ | 9,946 | ||||
FCBs net income was $9.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $10.3 million for the same year ago period. The decrease was primarily due to (i) a $2.8 million decrease in noninterest income which was comprised of recognition of the gain on the sale of the credit card portfolio in the first quarter of 2003, lower trading gains and a decrease in gains on the sale of securities, which was partially offset by a gain on the sale of properties, increased service charges and other noninterest income; (ii) a $1.4 million increase in noninterest expense due to increased professional fees including technology infrastructure administration, fees associated with the sale of nonaccruing and accruing higher risk mortgage loans, consulting services to ensure compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and fees related to the collection efforts on certain residential rental property loans; and increased salaries and employee benefits as a result of additional personnel and lower deferred origination loan costs and (iii) a $0.9 million increase in the provision for loan losses primarily due to the impact of the June 2003 problem loan sale on the historical loss ratios and allocation factors used in the allowance model. These items were partially offset by a $4.0 million decrease in interest expense due to a shift in funding sources from higher cost retail certificates of deposit to lower cost transaction based accounts, the benefits from the refinancing of $50 million and $81 million of fixed-term advances in the second quarter and fourth quarter of 2003, respectively, and the results from certain asset-liability management transactions entered into during the first quarter of 2004.
Other operating segments reported net income of $0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to a net loss of $0.2 million for the same year ago period. The increase was attributable to higher noninterest income of $1.8 million due to increases in financial management income, insurance services revenues and brokerage services revenues. The increases were partially offset by increased noninterest expense of $0.8 million due to higher incentive compensation based on the increases in noninterest income. These changes resulted
26
in tax expense of $0.2 million for the first quarter of 2004, compared to a tax benefit of $0.1 million for the same year ago period.
Balance Sheet Analysis
Securities Available for Sale
The securities portfolio, all of which is classified as available for sale, is a component of the Corporations asset-liability management strategy. The decision to purchase or sell securities is based upon liquidity needs, changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, and other factors. Securities available for sale are accounted for at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded net of tax as a component of other comprehensive income in shareholders equity.
The fair value of the securities portfolio is determined by a third party. The valuation is determined as of a date within close proximity to the end of the reporting period based on available quoted market prices or quoted market prices for similar securities if a quoted market price is not available.
At March 31, 2004, securities available for sale were $1.62 billion or 38.2 percent of total assets, compared to $1.60 billion or 38.1 percent of total assets at December 31, 2003. The Corporations strategy is to maintain the portfolio at its current level. This approach will provide the Corporation the opportunity to reinvest the cash flows from the portfolio in higher rate investments in a rising interest rate environment.
The carrying value of securities available for sale was approximately $18.4 million above their amortized cost at March 31, 2004 and $10.1 million above their amortized cost at December 31, 2003. The weighted average life of the portfolio was 4.12 years at March 31, 2004 compared to 3.66 years at December 31, 2003.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale consists primarily of 15 and 30 year mortgages which the Corporation intends to sell as whole loans to improve its liquidity position. Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market. Loans held for sale were $18.0 million and $5.1 million at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Loans held for sale was impacted by originations, sales activity and securitizations, which is reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. No valuation allowance to reduce these loans to lower of cost or market was required at March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
Loan Portfolio
The Corporations loan portfolio at March 31, 2004 consisted of six major categories: Commercial Non Real Estate, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Mortgage, Consumer, and Home Equity. Within these six segments the Corporation targets customers in our geographic area, works within most business segments and focuses on a relationship based business model. Pricing is driven by quality, loan size, the Corporations relationship with the customer and by competition. The Corporation is primarily a secured lender in all these loan categories. The Corporations loans are generally five years or less in duration with the exception of home equity lines and residential mortgages, for which the terms range from 15 to 30 years. In addition, the Corporation has a program in which it buys and sells portions of loans, both participations and syndications, from key strategic partner financial institutions with which the Corporation has established relationships. Loans purchased and sold through the strategic partners program were $105.7 million and $9.3 million, respectively, at March 31, 2004. This portfolio includes commercial real estate, commercial non real estate and construction loans. This program enables the Corporation to diversify both its geographic and its total exposure risk.
Commercial Non Real Estate
The Corporations commercial non real estate lending program is generally targeted to serve small-to-middle market businesses with sales of $50 million or less in the Corporations geographic area. Commercial lending includes commercial, financial, agricultural and industrial loans. Pricing on commercial non real estate loans, driven largely by the Corporations relationship with the customer and by competition, is usually tied to widely recognized market indexes, such as the prime rate, the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) or rates on US Treasury securities.
27
Commercial Real Estate
Similar to commercial non real estate lending, the Corporations commercial real estate lending program is generally targeted to serve small-to-middle market business with sales of $50 million or less in the Corporations geographic area. The real estate loans are both owner occupied and project related. As with commercial non real estate loans, pricing on commercial real estate loans, driven largely by the Corporations relationship with the customer and by competition, is usually tied to widely recognized market indexes, such as the prime rate, LIBOR or rates on US Treasury securities.
Construction
Real estate construction loans include both commercial and residential construction/permanent loans, which are intended to convert to permanent loans upon completion of the construction project. Loans for commercial construction are usually to in-market developers, builders, businesses, individuals or real estate investors for the construction of commercial structures primarily in the Corporations market area. From time to time, the Corporation purchases construction loans in other market areas through a correspondent relationship. Construction loans purchased are typically serviced by third parties. Loans are made for purposes including, but not limited to, the construction of industrial facilities, apartments, shopping centers, office buildings, homes and warehouses. The properties may be constructed for sale, lease or owner-occupancy.
Mortgage
The Corporation originates 1-4 family residential mortgage loans throughout the Corporations footprint and in Reston, Virginia, which is a loan origination office. The Corporation offers a full line of products, including conventional, conforming, and jumbo fixed rate and adjustable rate mortgages which are originated and sold into the secondary market; however, from time to time a portion of this production is retained and are serviced by the Corporation.
Consumer
The Corporation offers a wide variety of consumer loan products. Various types of secured and unsecured loans are marketed to qualifying existing customers and to other creditworthy candidates in the Corporations market area. Unsecured loans, including revolving credits (e.g. checking account overdraft protection and personal lines of credit) are provided and various installment loan products such as vehicle loans are offered. All consumer lending is centrally decisioned and documented.
Home Equity
Home Equity loans and lines are secured by first and second deeds of trust on the borrowers residential real estate. As with all consumer lending, home equity loans are centrally decisioned and documented to ensure the underwriting conforms to the corporate lending policy.
Gross loans increased $27.3 million to $2.28 billion at March 31, 2004 compared to $2.25 billion at December 31, 2003. The growth in loans was primarily due to a $25.0 million increase in commercial real estate loans, a $21.4 million increase in home equity loans partially due to the Corporations direct mailing campaign and a $7.8 million increase in primarily adjustable rate mortgage loans driven by refinancings and the low interest rate environment. These increases were partially offset by a $12.8 million and a $12.1 million decrease in consumer and construction loans, respectively. In addition, $6.4 million of nonaccruing and accruing higher risk mortgage loans were sold to investors during the first quarter of 2004 and $15.9 million of primarily fixed rate mortgage loans originated in the first quarter of 2004 were classified as held for sale.
28
The table below summarizes loans in the classifications indicated as of March 31, 2004, and December 31, 2003.
Table Seven
Loan Portfolio Composition
March 31, | % | December 31, | % | ||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | of Total Loans | 2003 | of Total Loans | |||||||||||||
Commercial real estate |
$ | 749,355 | 32.86 | % | $ | 724,340 | 32.15 | % | |||||||||
Commercial non real estate |
210,010 | 9.21 | 212,010 | 9.41 | |||||||||||||
Construction |
346,109 | 15.18 | 358,217 | 15.90 | |||||||||||||
Mortgage |
288,505 | 12.65 | 280,748 | 12.46 | |||||||||||||
Consumer |
271,686 | 11.92 | 284,448 | 12.63 | |||||||||||||
Home equity |
414,410 | 18.18 | 393,041 | 17.45 | |||||||||||||
Total loans |
2,280,075 | 100.00 | 2,252,804 | 100.00 | |||||||||||||
Less allowance for loan
losses |
(25,736 | ) | (1.13 | ) | (25,607 | ) | (1.14 | ) | |||||||||
Unearned income |
(209 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (167 | ) | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||
Loans, net |
$ | 2,254,130 | 98.86 | % | $ | 2,227,030 | 98.85 | % | |||||||||
Deposits
CHAMP continues to attract new accounts and generate deposits. During the first quarter of 2004, 10,258 new checking accounts were opened. In addition, during the first quarter of 2004 the Corporation introduced a new money market account, the Performance Plus Account, which offers an above market introductory interest rate for the first 90 days after an account is opened. This product has been very successful with total balances at March 31, 2004 of $111.5 million. The emphasis of these programs is to develop new customer relationships to generate additional fee income opportunities and to shift our funding mix towards lower-cost funding sources.
Total deposits increased $79.5 million to $2.51 billion at March 31, 2004 compared to $2.43 billion at December 31, 2003. The increase in deposits was due to a $36.0 million increase in money market accounts, a $40.0 million increase in low-cost interest checking, savings and noninterest bearing deposits and a $30.0 million increase in brokered certificates of deposit. These increases were partially offset by a $26.4 million decrease in higher-cost retail certificates of deposit. Table Two provides information on the average amounts of deposits.
Other Borrowings
Other borrowings decreased to $1.38 billion at March 31, 2004 compared to $1.43 billion at December 31, 2003. Higher levels of retail deposits allowed the Corporation to reduce its dependency on other borrowings.
Credit Risk Management
The Corporations credit risk policy and procedures are centralized for every loan type. In addition, all mortgage, consumer and home equity loans are centrally decisioned. All loans flow through an independent closing unit to ensure proper documentation. Lastly, all known collection or problem loans are centrally managed by experienced workout personnel. To monitor the effectiveness of policies and procedures, Management maintains a set of asset quality standards for past due, nonaccrual and watch list loans and monitors the trends of these standards over time. These standards are approved by the Board of Directors and reviewed quarterly with the Board of Directors for compliance.
Loan Administration and Underwriting
The Banks Chief Credit Officer is responsible for the continuous assessment of the Banks risk profile as well as making any necessary adjustments to policies and procedures. Commercial loans less than $500,000 may be approved by experienced loan officers, within their loan authority. Commercial and commercial real estate loans are approved by signature authority requiring at least two experienced lenders for any relationships greater than $500,000 and an independent Risk Manager whenever the relationship is greater than $1 million. All relationships
29
greater than $2.0 million receive a comprehensive annual review by the senior lending officers of the Bank, which is then reviewed by the independent Risk Management Officers and the final approval officer with the appropriate signature authority. Commitments over $5.0 million are further reviewed by senior lending officers of the Bank, the Chief Credit Officer and the Lending Oversight Committee comprised of executive and senior management. In addition, commitments over $10.0 million are reviewed by the Board of Directors Loan Committee. These oversight committees provide policy, process, product and specific relationship direction to the lending personnel. The Corporation has a general target lending limit of $10 million per relationship; however, at times some loans may exceed that limit. As of March 31, 2004, the Corporation had ten relationships with exposure greater than the $10 million lending limit. At March 31, 2004, the total loan balance of these relationships was $82.6 million, all of which were current, with unfunded commitments totaling $40.8 million.
The Corporations loan portfolio consists of loans made for a variety of commercial and consumer purposes. Because commercial loans are made, based to a great extent on the Corporations assessment of a borrowers income, cash flow, character and ability to repay, such loans are viewed as involving a higher degree of credit risk than is the case with residential mortgage loans or consumer loans. To manage this risk, the Corporations commercial loan portfolio is managed under a defined process which includes underwriting standards and risk assessment, procedures for loan approvals, loan grading, ongoing identification and management of credit deterioration and portfolio reviews to assess loss exposure and to ascertain compliance with the Corporations credit policies and procedures.
In general, consumer loans (including mortgage and home equity) are deemed less risky than commercial loans. Commercial loans (including commercial real estate, commercial non real estate and construction loans) are generally larger in size and more complex than consumer loans. Commercial real estate loans are deemed less risky than commercial non real estate and construction loans, as the collateral value of real estate generally maintains its value better than non real estate or construction collateral. Consumer loans, being smaller in size, provide risk diversity across the portfolio. Because mortgage loans are secured by first liens on the consumers residential real estate, they are the Corporations least risky loan type. Home equity loans are deemed less risky than unsecured consumer loans as home equity loans and lines are secured by first or second deeds of trust on the borrowers residential real estate. A centralized decisioning process is in place to control the risk of the consumer, home equity and mortgage loan portfolio. This process is detailed in the underwriting guidelines which cover each retail loan product type from underwriting, servicing, compliance issues and closing procedures.
The Corporations primary market area includes the state of North Carolina but predominately centers around the Metro region of Charlotte. At March 31, 2004, the majority of the total loan portfolio, as well as a substantial portion of the commercial and real estate loan portfolio, represents loans to borrowers within this Metro region. An economic downturn in our primary market area could adversely affect our business. The diversity of the regions economic base tends to provide a stable lending environment. No significant concentration of credit risk has been identified due to the diverse industrial base in the region.
Derivatives
Credit risk associated with derivatives is measured as the net replacement cost should the counter-parties with contracts in a gain position to the Corporation completely fail to perform under the terms of those contracts assuming no recoveries of underlying collateral. In managing derivative credit risk, both the current exposure, which is the replacement cost of contracts on the measurement date, as well as an estimate of the potential change in value of contracts over their remaining lives are considered. In managing credit risk associated with its derivative activities, the Corporation deals primarily with commercial banks, broker-dealers and corporations. To minimize credit risk, the Corporation enters into legally enforceable master netting agreements, which reduce risk by permitting the closeout and netting of transactions with the same counter-party upon the occurrence of certain events. In the first quarter of 2004, the Corporation entered into a series of interest rate swap agreements to provide an exchange of interest payments computed on notional amounts that will offset any undesirable change in fair value resulting from market rate changes on designated hedged items. See Asset-Liability Management and Interest Rate Risk for further details regarding these interest rate swap agreements.
30
Nonperforming Assets
Nonperforming assets are comprised of nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned (OREO). The nonaccrual status is determined after a loan is 90 days past due as to principal or interest, unless in managements opinion collection of both principal and interest is assured by way of collateralization, guarantees or other security and the loan is in the process of collection. OREO represents real estate acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu thereof and is generally carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less estimated costs to sell.
Nonaccrual loans at March 31, 2004 decreased to $11.8 million compared to $14.9 million at December 31, 2003. The decrease was primarily due to the sale of $2.1 million of nonaccrual mortgage loans in March 2004. OREO decreased to $6.2 million at March 31, 2004 from $6.8 million at December 31, 2003. Classified assets at March 31, 2004 remained unchanged at $ 43.3 million compared to at December 31, 2003.
The table below summarizes the Corporations nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest as of the dates indicated. As a result of the Corporations continued focus on asset quality and the initiatives taken in 2003 and in the first quarter of 2004, our asset quality ratios have improved significantly as evidenced in the following table.
Table Eight
Nonperforming and Problem Assets
March 31 | December 31 | September 30 | June 30 | March 31 | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | 2003 | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans |
$ | 11,845 | $ | 14,910 | $ | 13,398 | $ | 11,144 | $ | 30,021 | |||||||||||
Other real estate owned |
6,199 | 6,836 | 6,709 | 6,866 | 11,200 | ||||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming assets |
18,044 | 21,746 | 20,107 | 18,010 | 41,221 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans 90 days or more past due
and still accruing interest |
| 21 | 21 | 312 | | ||||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming assets and loans 90 days or
more past due and still accruing interest |
$ | 18,044 | $ | 21,767 | $ | 20,128 | $ | 18,322 | $ | 41,221 | |||||||||||
Nonperforming assets as a percentage of: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
0.42 | % | 0.52 | % | 0.49 | % | 0.45 | % | 1.03 | % | |||||||||||
Total loans and other real estate owned |
0.79 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.87 | 1.97 | ||||||||||||||||
Past due loans over 30 days as a percentage of loans |
0.64 | 1.04 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 1.03 | ||||||||||||||||
Classified assets as a percentage of loans |
1.90 | 1.92 | 1.86 | 1.99 | 4.71 | ||||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of loans |
0.52 | 0.66 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 1.44 | ||||||||||||||||
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to
nonperforming loans |
2.17 | x | 1.72 | x | 1.79 | x | 2.12 | x | 0.88 | x |
Nonaccrual loans at March 31, 2004 were not concentrated in any one industry and primarily consisted of several large credits secured by real estate. Management anticipates that nonaccrual loans may increase in the near term as some customers continue to experience difficulties in this current economic environment. Management has taken current economic conditions into consideration when estimating the allowance for loan losses. See Allowance for Loan Losses for a more detailed discussion.
The determination to discontinue the accrual of interest is based on a review of each loan. Generally, accrual of interest is discontinued on loans 90 days past due as to principal or interest unless in managements opinion collection of both principal and interest is assured by way of collateralization, guarantees or other security and the loan is in the process of collection. Managements policy for any accruing loan greater than 90 days past due is to perform an analysis of the loan, including a consideration of the financial position of the borrower and any guarantor as well as the value of the collateral, and use this information to make an assessment as to whether collectibility of the principal and interest appears probable. If such collectibility is not probable, the loans are placed on nonaccrual status. Loans are returned to accrual status when management determines, based on an evaluation of the underlying collateral together with the borrowers payment record and financial condition, that the borrower has the ability and intent to meet the contractual obligations of the loan agreement.
31
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Corporations allowance for loan losses consists of four components: (i) valuation allowances computed on impaired loans in accordance with SFAS No. 114; (ii) valuation allowance for certain classified loans; (iii) valuation allowances determined by applying historical loss rates to those loans not considered impaired; and (iv) valuation allowances for factors which management believes are not reflected in the historical loss rates or that otherwise need to be considered when estimating the allowance for loan losses. These four components are estimated quarterly by Credit Risk Management and, along with a narrative analysis, comprise the Corporations allowance for loan losses model. The resulting components are used by management to determine the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
All estimates of loan portfolio risk, including the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, are subject to general and local economic conditions, among other factors, which are unpredictable and beyond the Corporations control. Since a significant portion of the loan portfolio is comprised of real estate loans and loans to area businesses, the Corporation is subject to risk in the real estate market and changes in the economic conditions in its primary market area. Changes in these areas can increase or decrease the provision for loan losses.
The table below presents certain data for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, including the following: (i) the allowance for loan losses at the beginning of the year, (ii) loans charged off and recovered (iii) loan charge-offs, net, (iv) the provision for loan losses, (v) the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2004 and 2003, (vi) the average amount of net loans outstanding during the quarter, (vii) the ratio of net charge-offs to average loans and (viii) the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to loans at March 31, 2004 and 2003.
Table Nine
Allowance For Loan Losses
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 25,607 | $ | 27,204 | ||||||
Loan charge-offs: |
||||||||||
Commercial non real estate |
265 | 1,569 | ||||||||
Commercial real estate |
1,035 | 212 | ||||||||
Mortgage |
29 | 5 | ||||||||
Consumer |
855 | 596 | ||||||||
Home equity |
398 | 84 | ||||||||
Total loans charged-off |
2,582 | 2,466 | ||||||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off: |
||||||||||
Commercial non real estate |
25 | 91 | ||||||||
Commercial real estate |
| 1 | ||||||||
Consumer |
235 | 133 | ||||||||
Other |
| 28 | ||||||||
Total recoveries of loans previously charged-off |
260 | 253 | ||||||||
Net charge-offs |
2,322 | 2,213 | ||||||||
Provision for loan losses |
3,000 | 2,051 | ||||||||
Allowance related to loans sold |
(549 | ) | (547 | ) | ||||||
Balance, March 31 |
$ | 25,736 | $ | 26,495 | ||||||
Average loans |
$ | 2,271,763 | $ | 2,102,568 | ||||||
Net charge-offs to average loans (annualized) |
0.41 | % | 0.43 | % | ||||||
Allowance for loan losses to
gross loans |
1.13 | 1.28 | ||||||||
The allowance for loan losses was $25.7 million or 1.13 percent of gross loans at March 31, 2004 compared to $25.6 million or 1.14 percent of gross loans at December 31, 2003. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans decreased primarily due to the impact of improved asset quality trends on the historical loss factors used in the loan loss migration model. In addition, the allowance for loan losses was reduced by $0.5 million due to the sale of nonaccruing and accruing higher risk mortgage loans and by net charge-offs of $2.3 million. These reductions were offset by additional provision expense of $3.0 million.
32
The allowance for loan losses was also impacted by changes in the allocation of loan losses to various loan types. Total commercial loan allocations decreased $0.5 million primarily due to decreases in the historical loss factors as asset quality trends improved. As a result of the June 2003 problem loan, the historical loss factors in the allowance model increased. As the asset quality in the commercial loan portfolio improves the historical loss factors continue to decrease. Management anticipates the historical loss factors to continue to trend lower over time, as the allowance model will be impacted by lower historical losses. Mortgage loan allocations of allowance remained relatively flat during the first quarter of 2004. The mortgage loan allocations were affected by the sale of nonaccruing and accruing higher risk mortgage loans and by mortgage loan growth. Consumer loan allocation factors increased $0.6 million primarily due to increases in the consumer historical loss factors used in the allowance model.
Management considers the allowance for loan losses adequate to cover inherent losses in the Banks loan portfolio as of the date of the financial statements. Management believes it has established the allowance in consideration of the current economic environment. While management uses the best information available to make evaluations, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic and other conditions. Additionally, various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Banks allowance for loan losses. Such agencies may require the recognition of adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments of information available to them at the time of their examinations.
Provision for Loan Losses
The provision for loan losses is the amount charged to earnings which is necessary to maintain an adequate and appropriate allowance for loan losses. Accordingly, the factors which influence changes in the allowance for loan losses have a direct effect on the provision for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses changes from period to period as a result of a number of factors, the most significant of which for the Corporation include the following: (i) changes in the mix of types of loans; (ii) current charge-offs and recoveries of loans; (iii) changes in impaired loan valuation allowances; (iv) changes in valuations in certain performing loans which have specific allocations; (v) changes in credit grades within the portfolio, which arise from a deterioration or an improvement in the performance of the borrower; (vi) changes in historical loss percentages; and (vii) changes in the amounts of loans outstanding, which are used to estimate current probable loan losses. In addition, the Corporation considers other, more subjective factors which impact the credit quality of the portfolio as a whole and estimates allocations of allowance for loan losses for these factors, as well. These factors include loan concentrations, economic conditions and operational risks. Changes in these components of the allowance can arise from fluctuations in the underlying percentages used as related loss estimates for these factors, as well as variations in the portfolio balances to which they are applied. The net change in all of these components of the allowance for loan losses results in the provision for loan losses. For a more detailed discussion of the Corporations process for estimating the allowance for loan losses, see Allowance for Loan Losses.
The provision for loan losses increased to $3.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to $2.1 million for the same year ago period. The increase was primarily due to the impact of the June 2003 problem loan sale on the historical loss ratios and allocation factors used in the allowance model. In addition, the provision included $0.5 million due to the credit-related discount taken on the previously mentioned sale of nonaccruing and accruing higher risk mortgage loans in the first quarter of 2004.
The provision for loan losses was also impacted by an increase in net charge-offs of $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to the same year ago period, and increases in the credit risk due to growth in the loan portfolio in 2004 compared to 2003.
Net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2004 amounted to $2.3 million, or 0.41 percent of average loans, compared to $2.2 million, or 0.43 percent of average loans for the same 2003 period. Approximately $0.9 million of the first quarter 2004 charge-offs related to certain residential rental property loans identified in the second quarter of 2003. At March 31, 2004, there were 126 of these loans remaining with a balance of $8.9 million and an allocated allowance of $2.0 million.
During 2004, the Corporation made no changes to its estimated loss percentages for economic factors. As a part of its quarterly assessment of the allowance for loan losses, the Corporation reviews key local, regional and national economic information, and assesses its impact on the allowance for loan losses. Based on its review for the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Corporation noted that economic conditions continue to be weak;
33
however, management concluded that the impact on borrowers and local industries in the Corporations primary market area did not change significantly during the period. Accordingly, the Corporation did not modify its loss estimate percentage attributable to economic factors in its allowance for loan losses model.
The Corporation also continuously reviews its portfolio for any concentrations of loans to any one borrower or industry in the area. To analyze its concentrations, the Corporation prepares various reports showing total loans to borrowers by industry, as well as reports showing total loans to one borrower. At the present time, the Corporation does not believe it is overly concentrated to any industry or specific borrower, and therefore has made no allocations of allowances for loan losses for this factor for any of the periods presented.
The Corporation also monitors the amount of operational risk that exists in the portfolio. This would include the front-end underwriting, documentation and closing processes associated with the lending decision. Additional reserves have been set-aside in the allowance model for operational risk due to the differences in underwriting methodologies underlying the loans inherited through mergers. With the implementation of one central loan policy and procedure, this risk appears to be stable. As a result, the percent of additional allocation for the operational reserve has not changed in recent periods.
Market Risk Management
Asset-Liability Management and Interest Rate Risk
The primary objective of the Corporations asset-liability management strategy is to enhance earnings through balance sheet growth while reducing or minimizing the risk caused by interest rate changes. One method used to manage interest rate sensitivity is to measure, over various time periods, the interest rate sensitivity positions, or gaps; however, this method addresses only the magnitude of timing differences and does not address earnings or market value. Management uses an earnings simulation model to assess the amount of earnings at risk due to changes in interest rates. Management believes this method more accurately measures interest rate risk. This model is updated monthly and is based on a range of interest rate shock scenarios. Under the Corporations policy, the limit for interest rate risk is 10 percent of net interest income when considering an increase or decrease in interest rates of 300 basis points over a twelve-month period. Assuming a 300 basis point pro-rata increase in interest rates over a twelve-month period, the Corporations sensitivity to interest rate risk would positively impact net interest income by approximately 6.19 percent of net interest income at March 31, 2004. Assuming a 100 basis point pro-rata decrease in interest rates over a twelve-month period, the Corporations sensitivity to interest rate risk would negatively impact net interest income by approximately 0.66 percent of net interest income at March 31, 2004. Although the Corporations policy for interest shock scenarios is an increase or decrease of 300 basis points, in the current low interest rate environment the decreased interest rate shock scenario is equal to the Fed Funds rate of 100 basis points. Both of the rate shock scenarios are within Managements acceptable range.
In the first quarter of 2004, the Corporation entered into a series of interest rate swap agreements. The interest rate swaps will result in the Corporation receiving interest at an average fixed rate of 5.15 percent and paying interest at an average variable rate of 3.26 percent, for an average period of 5.1 years with a notional amount of approximately $142 million.
The Corporation accounts for these interest rate swaps as a hedge of the fair value of the related FHLB advances. Accordingly, the Corporation records on a quarterly basis, in earnings, the net change in the fair value of the interest rate swap and the related FHLB advances, provided the criteria for hedge accounting continue to be met. In the event such criteria are not met in a future period, the Corporation will only record changes in the fair value on the interest rate swap.
As a result of swapping $142 million of fixed rate debt payments for variable rate payments, the Corporations balance sheet would become liability sensitive. Therefore, as part of the Corporations asset/liability management strategy of preserving the asset sensitive nature of the Corporations balance sheet, the Corporation replaced approximately $165 million of existing FHLB floating rate overnight borrowings with fixed rate FHLB advances with maturities of one to three years.
The Corporation expects to enter into additional interest rate swap transactions during 2004 to the extent business conditions warrant.
34
Interest rate swaps assist the Corporations Asset Liability Management (ALM) process. The Corporations interest rate risk management strategy includes the use of interest rate contracts to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings that are caused by interest rate volatility. The Corporations goal is to manage interest rate sensitivity so that movements in interest rates do not significantly adversely affect net interest income. As a result of interest rate fluctuations, hedged fixed-rate liabilities appreciate or depreciate in market value. Gains or losses on the derivative instruments that are linked to the hedged fixed-rate liabilities are expected to substantially offset this unrealized appreciation or depreciation.
Interest rate contracts, which are generally non-leveraged interest rate swaps, allow the Corporation to effectively manage its interest rate risk position. Non-leveraged interest rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed-rate and variable-rate interest payments based on the contractual underlying notional amount. Exposure to loss on these contracts will increase or decrease over their respective lives as interest rates fluctuate.
Refer to Note Seven of the consolidated financial statements for a discussion of the Corporations use of written over-the-counter covered call options.
Table Ten summarizes the expected maturities and weighted average effective yields and rates associated with certain of the Corporations significant non-trading financial instruments. Cash and cash equivalents, federal funds sold and interest bearing bank deposits, are excluded from Table Ten as their respective carrying values approximate fair values. These financial instruments generally expose the Corporation to insignificant market risk as they have either no stated maturities or an average maturity of less than 30 days and interest rates that approximate market rates. However, these financial instruments could expose the Corporation to interest rate risk by requiring more or less reliance on alternative funding sources, such as long-term debt. The mortgage-backed securities are shown at their weighted average expected life, obtained from an outside evaluation of the average remaining life of each security based on historic prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgages at March 31, 2004. These expected maturities, weighted average effective yields and fair values will change if interest rates change. Demand deposits, money market accounts and certain savings deposits are presented in the earliest maturity window because they have no stated maturity.
35
Table Ten
Market Risk
March 31, 2004
Expected Maturity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Total | 1 Year | 2 Years | 3 Years | 4 Years | 5 Years | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Debt securities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book value |
$ | 1,625,773 | $ | 642,473 | $ | 299,913 | $ | 239,053 | $ | 137,028 | $ | 253,257 | $ | 54,049 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average effective yield |
3.83 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value |
$ | 1,559,328 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans and loans held for sale |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book value |
$ | 671,105 | 134,528 | 105,838 | 93,316 | 84,373 | 72,582 | 180,468 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average effective yield |
6.49 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value |
$ | 731,579 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable rate |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book value |
$ | 1,600,994 | 584,583 | 207,621 | 174,218 | 146,850 | 112,246 | 375,476 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average effective yield |
4.44 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value |
$ | 1,596,397 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book value |
$ | 1,193,782 | 907,220 | 195,539 | 62,845 | 25,547 | 2,238 | 393 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average effective yield |
2.18 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value |
$ | 1,196,346 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable rate |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book value |
$ | 960,527 | 958,739 | 1,731 | 57 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average effective yield |
0.51 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value |
$ | 960,532 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed rate |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book value |
$ | 780,042 | 235,046 | 110,053 | 225,365 | 59 | 62 | 209,457 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average effective yield |
2.88 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value |
$ | 775,796 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable rate |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Book value |
$ | 597,332 | 597,332 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average effective yield |
1.15 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value |
$ | 597,352 |
Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The Corporation is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer so long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates and may require collateral from the borrower if deemed necessary by the Corporation. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Corporation to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party up to a stipulated amount and with specified terms and conditions. Standby letters of credit are recorded as a liability by the Corporation at the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. Commitments to extend credit are not recorded as an asset or liability by the Corporation until the instrument is exercised. Refer to Note Twelve of the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of commitments. The Corporation does not have any special purpose entities or off-balance sheet financing arrangements.
36
The following table presents aggregated information about commitments of the Corporation which could impact future periods.
Table Eleven
Commitments
As of March 31, 2004
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period | |||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | Total Amounts | ||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 1 year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | Over 5 Years | Committed | ||||||||||||||||
Lines of Credit |
$ | 28,972 | $ | 2,341 | $ | 3,782 | $ | 295,897 | $ | 330,992 | |||||||||||
Standby Letters of Credit |
7,846 | 131 | | | 7,977 | ||||||||||||||||
Loan Commitments |
326,437 | 49,821 | 15,038 | 2,836 | 394,132 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Commitments |
$ | 363,255 | $ | 52,293 | $ | 18,820 | $ | 298,733 | $ | 733,101 | |||||||||||
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity is the ability to maintain cash flows adequate to fund operations and meet obligations and other commitments on a timely and cost-effective basis. Liquidity is provided by the ability to attract retail deposits, by current earnings, and by a strong capital base that enables the Corporation to use alternative funding sources that complement normal sources. Managements asset-liability policy is to maximize net interest income while continuing to provide adequate liquidity to meet continuing loan demand and deposit withdrawal requirements and to service normal operating expenses. The Corporation sets liquidity management guidelines for both the consolidated balance sheet, as well as for the Corporation, specifically to ensure that the Corporation is a source of strength for its regulated, deposit-taking banking subsidiary.
The Corporations primary source of funding is from customer deposits, other borrowings, loan repayments, and securities available for sale. Cash flows from operations are a significant component of liquidity risk management and include both deposit maturities and scheduled cash flows from loan and investment maturities payments. Cash flows from operating activities increased in the first quarter 2004 mainly due to net income and an increase in other liabilities, partially offset by greater funding needs for originations of mortgage loans held for sale than proceeds received from the sale of such loans. Cash flows used in investing activities declined in the first quarter 2004 as the purchases of securities available for sale and loan originations exceeded the sale and maturities of securities available for sale. Cash flows from financing activities increased mainly due to an increase in deposits to fund the increase in securities available for sale and loans, partially offset by a decrease in borrowings.
If additional funding sources are needed, the Bank has access to federal fund lines at correspondent banks and borrowings from the Federal Reserve discount window. In addition to these sources, as described above, the Bank is a member of the FHLB, which provides access to FHLB lending sources. At March 31, 2004, the Bank had an available line of credit with the FHLB totaling $1.16 billion with $1.1 billion outstanding. At March 31, 2004, the Bank also had federal funds back-up lines of credit totaling $70.0 million, of which there were no amounts outstanding. At March 31, 2004, the Corporation had lines of credit with SunTrust Bank totaling $25.0 million with $15.0 million outstanding and commercial paper outstandings of $27.9 million.
Another source of liquidity is the securities available for sale portfolio. See Securities Available for Sale for further discussion. Management believes the Banks sources of liquidity are adequate to meet loan demand, operating needs and deposit withdrawal requirements.
Capital Management
The objective of effective capital management is to generate above market returns on equity to our shareholders while maintaining adequate regulatory capital ratios. The Corporation uses capital to fund growth, acquire other companies, pay dividends and repurchase its common stock.
Shareholders equity at March 31, 2004 increased to $308.7 million, representing 7.27 percent of period-end assets compared to $299.4 million or 7.12 percent of period-end assets at December 31, 2003. The increase was due mainly to net income of $9.2 million and a $5.1 million increase in the after-tax unrealized gain on available for sale securities resulting from a decrease in rates across the yield curve, partially offset by cash dividend payments of $5.5 million.
37
On January 23, 2002, the Corporations Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1.5 million shares of the Corporations common stock. As of March 31, 2004, the Corporation had repurchased a total of 1.4 million shares of its common stock at an average per-share price of $17.52 under this authorization, which has reduced shareholders equity by $24.5 million. No shares were repurchased under this authorization during the three months ended March 31, 2004.
On October 24, 2003, the Corporations Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1.5 million additional shares of the Corporations common stock. At March 31, 2004, no shares had been repurchased under this authorization.
At March 31, 2004, the Corporation and the Bank were in compliance with all existing capital requirements. The most recent notifications from the Corporations and the Banks various regulators categorized the Corporation and the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. In the judgment of management, there have been no events or conditions since those notifications that would change the well capitalized status of the Corporation or the Bank. The Corporations capital requirements are summarized in the table below:
Table Twelve
Capital Ratios
Risk-Based Capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leverage Capital | Tier 1 Capital | Total Capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Amount | Percentage (1) | Amount | Percentage (2) | Amount | Percentage (2) | ||||||||||||||||||
Actual |
$ | 276,766 | 6.55 | % | $ | 276,766 | 10.04 | % | $ | 303,189 | 11.00 | % | ||||||||||||
Required |
169,102 | 4.00 | 110,248 | 4.00 | 220,497 | 8.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
Excess |
107,664 | 2.55 | 166,518 | 6.04 | 82,692 | 3.00 |
(1) | Percentage of total adjusted average assets. The Federal Reserve Board minimum leverage ratio requirement is 3.00 percent to 5.00 percent, depending on the institutions composite rating as determined by its regulators. The Federal Reserve Board has not advised the Corporation of any specific requirement applicable to it. | |
(2) | Percentage of risk-weighted assets. |
Regulatory Recommendations
Management is not presently aware of any current recommendations to the Corporation or to the Bank by regulatory authorities, which, if they were to be implemented, would have a material effect on the Corporations liquidity, capital resources, or operations.
During the third quarter of 2003, the Bank entered into a written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Office of the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks, the Banks primary federal and state regulatory agencies. The agreement arises out of certain previously disclosed regulatory examinations and requires the Bank to take appropriate actions to improve its programs and procedures for complying with the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act and the anti-money laundering provisions of Regulation H of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Bank has subsequently taken substantial actions, and adopted and implemented a number of policies and procedures, to address the concerns of the regulatory agencies.
Accounting Matters
In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (SFAS No. 148), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123. This Statement amends SFAS No. 123, to provide alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. It also amends the disclosure provisions of that Statement to require prominent disclosure about the effects on reported net income of an entitys accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation. Finally, this Statement amends APB Opinion No. 28 (APB No. 28), Interim Financial Reporting, to require disclosure about those effects in interim financial information. The Corporation currently has no plans to change its accounting for stock-based employee compensation. The disclosure provisions of this statement, except for the amendment of APB No. 28, are effective
38
for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. Accordingly, the Corporation adopted the disclosure provisions pursuant to this portion of the interpretation on December 31, 2002 and these disclosures are presented in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The provisions of this statement related to the amendment of APB Opinion No. 28 are effective for financial reports containing condensed financial statements for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. Accordingly, the Corporation adopted the disclosure provisions relevant to interim financial reporting on January 1, 2003, and these disclosures are presented in the notes to the Corporations interim and annual consolidated financial statements.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 46, (FIN 46), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which addresses consolidation of variable interest entities by business enterprises. Variable interest entities are entities with equity interests that do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. An enterprise shall consolidate a variable interest entity if that enterprise has a variable interest (or combination of variable interests) that will absorb a majority of expected losses if they occur, receive a majority of the entitys residual returns if they occur, or both. The enterprise that consolidates the variable interest entity is called the primary beneficiary of that entity. Under FIN 46 an enterprise that holds significant variable interests in a variable interest entity but is not the primary beneficiary is required to disclose the nature, purpose, size, and activities of the variable interest entity, its exposure to loss as a result of the variable interest holders involvement with the entity, and the nature of its involvement with the entity and date when the involvement began. The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity is required to disclose the nature, purpose, size, and activities of the variable interest entity, the carrying amount and classification of consolidated assets that are collateral for the variable interest entitys obligations, and any lack of recourse by creditors (or beneficial interest holders) of a consolidated variable interest entity to the general credit of the primary beneficiary. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FIN 46 (FIN 46 R), which clarifies and interprets certain provisions of FIN 46, without changing the basic accounting model of FIN 46. The Corporation adopted the provisions of FIN 46 and FIN 46 R effective March 2004 with no material effect on its consolidated financial statements. At March 31, 2004, the Corporation did not have any significant investments in variable interest entities and had no involvement with special purpose entities.
In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149 (SFAS No. 149), Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments and for hedging activities under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (SFAS No. 133). This statement clarifies when a contract with an initial net investment meets the characteristic of a derivative, clarifies when a derivative instrument contains a financing component, amends the definition of an underlying to conform it to language used in Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, and amends certain other existing pronouncements. This Statement requires that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly. This Statement is effective for most contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. For contracts with forward purchases or sales of when-issued securities or other securities that do not yet exist, this Statement is effective for both existing contracts and new contracts entered into after June 30, 2003. All provisions of this Statement should be applied prospectively. The Corporation adopted SFAS No. 149 on July 1, 2003 with no material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150 (SFAS No. 150), Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, which establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). This Statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. It is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of the Statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. Accordingly, the Corporation adopted SFAS No. 150 on July 1, 2003, with no effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In March 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105 (SAB 105), which contains specific guidance on the inputs to a valuation-recognition model to measure loan
39
commitments accounted for at fair value. SAB 105 requires that fair-value measurement include only differences between the guaranteed interest rate in the loan commitment and a market interest rate, excluding any expected future cash flows related to the customer relationship or loan servicing. It will limit opportunities for companies to recognize an asset related to a commitment to originate a mortgage loan that will be held for sale prior to funding. SAB 105 is effective for mortgage-loan commitments that are accounted for as derivatives and are entered into after March 31, 2004. The Corporation does not expect adoption of SAB 105 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
From time to time, the FASB issues exposure drafts for proposed statements of financial accounting standards. Such exposure drafts are subject to comment from the public, to revisions by the FASB and to final issuance by the FASB as statements of financial accounting standards. Management considers the effect of the proposed statements on the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation and monitors the status of changes to and proposed effective dates of exposure drafts.
40
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Asset-Liability Management and Interest Rate Sensitivity on page 34 for Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13(a)-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)) was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporations management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Based on that evaluation, the Corporations Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in its reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. During the last fiscal quarter, there has been no change in the Corporations internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Corporations internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The Corporation and the Bank are defendants in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operations, liquidity or financial position of the Corporation or the Bank.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(c) Recent sales of Unregistered Securities
On July 7, 2003, the Corporation, through First Charter Bank, its primary banking subsidiary, acquired all of the outstanding shares of a third party benefits administrator pursuant to a Merger Agreement dated as of the same date (the Merger Agreement). No underwriters were used in connection with this transaction. In connection with this transaction, the Corporation issued an aggregate of 78,441 shares of the Corporations common stock to John Googe and Jeannie Felts, the shareholders of such acquired entity. The issuance of the shares in connection with this transaction was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in accordance with Section 4(2) thereof, as a transaction by an issuer not involving a public offering. The Merger Agreement also contemplates additional, subsequent issuances of the Corporations common stock based upon the future performance of the acquired entity. The Corporation expects the value of these issuances, if earned, to total approximately $880,000. There were no additional issuances of the Corporations common stock for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
41
(e) Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table summarizes the Corporations repurchases of its common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
Total Number of Shares | Maximum Number of | ||||||||||||||||
Purchased as Part of | Shares that May Yet Be | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Average Price Paid | Publicly Announced Plans | Purchased Under the | ||||||||||||||
Period | Shares Purchased | per Share | or Programs (1) | Plans or Programs | |||||||||||||
January 1, 2004 - January 31, 2004 |
| | | 1,625,400 | |||||||||||||
February 1, 2004 - February 29, 2004 |
| | | 1,625,400 | |||||||||||||
March 1, 2004 - March 31, 2004 |
| | | 1,625,400 | |||||||||||||
Total |
| | | 1,625,400 | |||||||||||||
(1) | On January 24, 2002, the Corporation announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase plan to acquire up to 1,500,000 shares of the Corporations common stock from time to time. As of March 31, 2004, the Corporation had repurchased 1,374,600 shares under this authorization. No shares were repurchased under this authorization during the quarter ended March 31, 2004. On November 3, 2003, the Corporation announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase plan to acquire up to an additional 1,500,000 shares of the Corporations common stock from time to time. As of March 31, 2004, no shares have been repurchased under this authorization. These stock repurchase plans have no set expiration or termination date. |
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not Applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not Applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not Applicable
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) | Exhibits |
Exhibit No. | ||
(per Exhibit Table | ||
in item 601 of | ||
Regulation S-K) | Description of Exhibits | |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of First Charter Corporation. | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of First Charter Corporation. |
42
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
(b) | The following reports on Form 8-K were filed by the registrant during the quarter ended March 31, 2004: | ||
Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 28, 2004 and filed January 28, 2004, Item 7 and 11. | |||
Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 30, 2004 and filed January 30, 2004, Item 5 and 7. | |||
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 31, 2004 and filed March 31, 2004, Item 5. | |||
The following reports on Form 8-K were furnished by the registrant during the quarter ended March 31, 2004: | |||
Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 13, 2004 and filed January 13, 2004, Item 9 and 12. | |||
Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 3, 2004 and filed February 3, 2004, Item 9. |
43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
FIRST CHARTER CORPORATION | ||||
(Registrant) | ||||
Date: May 6, 2004 | By: | /s/ Robert O. Bratton | ||
Robert O. Bratton | ||||
Executive Vice President & | ||||
Chief Financial Officer |
44