UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-K

FOR ANNUAL AND TRANSITION REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

Commission File Number 0-15829

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (704) 688-4300

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common stock, no par value

Series X Junior Participating Preferred Stock Purchase Rights

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o

     The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2003 was $479,489,405.

     As of March 5, 2004 the Registrant had outstanding 29,735,990 shares of Common Stock, no par value.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

     PART III: Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Company’s 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on April 28, 2004. (With the exception of those portions which are specifically incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K, the Proxy Statement is not deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference as part of this report.)

FIRST CHARTER CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Part I

Item 1. Business

General

     First Charter Corporation (hereinafter referred to as either the “Registrant” or the “Corporation”) is a bank holding company established as a North Carolina Corporation in 1983 and is registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the “BHCA”). Its principal asset is the stock of its subsidiary, First Charter Bank (“FCB” or the “Bank”). The Bank accounts for over 98 percent of the Registrant’s consolidated assets and consolidated revenues. The principal executive offices of the Corporation are located at 10200 David Taylor Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina 28262. Its telephone number is (704) 688-4300.

     FCB, a North Carolina state bank, is the successor entity to The Concord National Bank, which was established in 1888. On April 4, 2000, the Corporation acquired Carolina First BancShares, Inc. (“Carolina First”), the holding company for Lincoln Bank, Cabarrus Bank and Community Bank & Trust, which merged into the Corporation. Carolina First was a North Carolina corporation and operated through its subsidiary banks and 31 branch offices principally in the greater Charlotte, North Carolina area. On September 1, 2000, Business Insurers of Guilford County (“Business Insurers”) was merged into First Charter Insurance Services. Each of these mergers was accounted for as a pooling of interests and accordingly, all financial information presented herein has been restated for all periods presented to reflect the mergers. On June 22, 2001, First Charter’s banking subsidiary converted from a national bank to First Charter Bank, a North Carolina state bank. The conversion was completed after a cost benefit analysis of supervisory regulatory charges and did not represent any disagreement with the Corporation’s or the Bank’s former regulators. The Bank continued to operate its financial center network franchise under the “First Charter” brand name.

     FCB is a full service bank, which now operates 54 financial centers, five insurance offices and one mortgage origination office in addition to its main office, as well as 93 ATMs (automated teller machines). These facilities are located in Ashe, Alleghany, Avery, Buncombe, Cabarrus, Cleveland, Guilford, Iredell, Jackson, Lincoln, McDowell, Mecklenburg, Rowan, Rutherford, Swain, Transylvania and Union counties of North Carolina. FCB, through First Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc., also operates an additional mortgage origination office in Virginia.

     The Corporation’s primary market area is located within North Carolina and predominately centers around the Metro region of Charlotte, North Carolina, including Mecklenburg County and its surrounding counties. Charlotte is the twenty-sixth largest city in the United States and has a diverse economic base. As of December 31, 2003, the unemployment rate for the Charlotte Metro region was 6.2 percent compared to 6.1 percent for the state of North Carolina. Primary business sectors in the Charlotte Metro region include banking and finance, insurance, manufacturing, health care, transportation, retail, telecommunications, government services and education. Thus, the Corporation believes that it is not dependent on any one or a few types of commerce due to the economic diversity in the region.

     Through its financial centers, the Bank provides a wide range of banking products, including interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking accounts; “Money Market Rate” accounts; certificates of deposit; individual retirement accounts; overdraft protection; commercial, consumer, agriculture, real estate, residential mortgage and home equity loans; personal and corporate trust services; safe deposit boxes; and automated banking.

     In addition, through First Charter Brokerage Services, Inc., a subsidiary of FCB, the Registrant offers full service and discount brokerage services, annuity sales and financial planning services pursuant to a third party arrangement with UVEST Investment Services. The Bank also operates two other subsidiaries: First Charter Insurance Services, Inc. and First Charter Leasing and Investments, Inc. First Charter Insurance Services, Inc. is a North Carolina corporation formed to meet the insurance needs of businesses and individuals throughout the Charlotte metropolitan area. First Charter Leasing and

3

Investments, Inc. is a North Carolina corporation engaged in commercial equipment leasing and the management of investment securities. It also acts as the holding company for First Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc., a Virginia corporation. First Charter of Virginia Realty Investments, Inc. is engaged in the mortgage origination business and also acts as a holding company for First Charter Realty Investments, Inc., a Delaware real estate investment trust. First Charter Realty Investments, Inc. is the holding company for FCB Real Estate, Inc., a North Carolina real estate investment trust, and First Charter Real Estate Holdings, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company, which owns and maintains the real estate property and assets of the Corporation. FCB Real Estate, Inc. primarily invests in commercial and 1-4 family residential real estate loans. The Bank also has a majority ownership in Lincoln Center at Mallard Creek, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company. Lincoln Center is a three-story office building occupied in part by a branch of FCB.

     At December 31, 2003, the Registrant and its subsidiaries had 1,031 full-time equivalent employees. The Registrant had no employees who were not also employees of FCB. The Registrant considers its relations with its employees to be good.

     As part of its operations, the Registrant is not dependent upon a single customer or a few customers whose loss would have a material adverse effect on the Registrant.

     As part of its operations, the Registrant regularly holds discussions and evaluates the potential acquisition of, or merger with, various financial institutions. In addition, the Registrant periodically enters new markets and engages in new activities in which it competes with established financial institutions. There can be no assurance as to the success of any such new office or activity. Furthermore, as the result of such expansions, the Registrant may from time to time incur start-up costs that could affect the financial results of the Registrant.

Competition

     The banking laws of North Carolina allow banks located in North Carolina to develop branches throughout the state. In addition, out-of-state institutions may open de novo branches in North Carolina as well as acquire or merge with institutions located in North Carolina. As a result of such laws, banking activities in North Carolina are highly competitive.

     FCB’s service delivery facilities are located in Ashe, Alleghany, Avery, Buncombe, Cabarrus, Cleveland, Guilford, Iredell, Jackson, Lincoln, McDowell, Mecklenburg, Rowan, Rutherford, Swain, Transylvania and Union counties of North Carolina. These locations also have numerous branches of money-center, super-regional, regional, and statewide institutions, some of which have a major presence in Charlotte. In its market area, the Registrant faces competition from other banks, savings and loan associations, savings banks, credit unions, finance companies and major retail stores that offer competing financial services. Many of these competitors have greater resources, broader geographic coverage and higher lending limits than the Bank. The Bank’s primary method of competition is to provide quality service and fairly priced products.

Government Supervision and Regulation

     General. As a registered bank holding company, the Registrant is subject to the supervision of and regular inspection by, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). The Corporation is a North Carolina chartered banking corporation and a Federal Reserve member bank, with deposits insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“FDIC”) insurance funds: the Bank Insurance Fund (“BIF”) and the Savings Association Insurance Fund (“SAIF”). FCB is subject to extensive regulation and examination by the Office of the Commissioner of Banks of the State of North Carolina (the “NC Commissioner”) under the direction and supervision of the North Carolina Banking Commission (the “NC Banking Commission”) and by the FDIC, which insures its deposits to the maximum extent permitted by law.

4

     In addition to state and federal banking laws, regulations and regulatory agencies, the Corporation and FCB are subject to various other laws and regulations and supervision and examination by other regulatory agencies, all of which directly or indirectly affect the Corporation’s operations, management and ability to make distributions. The following discussion summarizes certain aspects of those laws and regulations that affect the Corporation.

     Gramm-Leach Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act of 1999 (the “GLB Act”) eliminated certain legal barriers separating the conduct of various types of financial service businesses, such as commercial banking, investment banking and insurance in addition to substantially revamping the regulatory scheme within which the Corporation operates. Under the GLB Act, bank holding companies meeting management, capital and Community Reinvestment Act standards, and that have elected to become a financial holding company, may engage in a substantially broader range of traditionally nonbanking activities than was permissible before enactment, including insurance underwriting and making merchant banking investments in commercial and financial companies. The GLB Act also allows insurers and other financial services companies to acquire banks; removes various restrictions that currently apply to bank holding company ownership of securities firms and mutual fund advisory companies; and establishes the overall regulatory structure applicable to bank holding companies that also engage in insurance and securities operations.

     In addition, the GLB Act also modifies current law related to financial privacy and community reinvestment. The privacy provisions generally prohibit financial institutions from disclosing nonpublic personal financial information to nonaffiliated third parties unless the customer has the opportunity to “opt out” of the sharing of the customers’ nonpublic information with unaffiliated third parties.

     Restrictions on Bank Holding Companies. The Federal Reserve is authorized to adopt regulations affecting various aspects of bank holding companies. Under the BHCA, the Corporation’s activities, and those of companies which it controls or in which it holds more than five percent of the voting stock, are limited to banking or managing or controlling banks or furnishing services to or performing services for its subsidiaries, or any other activity which the Federal Reserve determines to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. In making such determinations, the Federal Reserve is required to consider whether the performance of such activities by a bank holding company or its subsidiaries reasonably can be expected to produce benefits to the public such as greater convenience, increased competition or gains in efficiency that outweigh possible adverse effects, such as undue concentration of resources, decreased or unfair competition, conflicts of interest or unsound banking practices. The BHCA, as amended by the GLB Act, generally limits the activities of a bank holding company (unless the bank holding company has elected to become a financial holding company) to activities that are closely related to banking and a proper incident thereto.

     Generally, bank holding companies are required to obtain prior approval of the Federal Reserve to engage in any new activity not previously approved by the Federal Reserve or to acquire more than five percent of any class of voting stock of any company. The BHCA also requires bank holding companies to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before acquiring more than five percent of any class of voting stock of any bank which is not already majority-owned by the bank holding company.

     The Corporation is also subject to the North Carolina Bank Holding Company Act of 1984. As required by this state legislation, the Corporation, by virtue of its ownership of FCB, has registered as a bank holding company with the NC Commissioner. The North Carolina Bank Holding Company Act also prohibits the Corporation from acquiring or controlling certain non-bank banking institutions which have offices in North Carolina.

     Interstate Banking and Branching Legislation. Pursuant to the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994 (the “Interstate Banking and Branching Act”), a bank holding company may acquire banks in states other than its home state, without regard to the permissibility of those acquisitions under state law, but subject to any state requirement that the bank has been organized and operating for a minimum period of time, not to exceed five years, and the requirement that the bank holding company, after the proposed acquisition, controls no more than 10 percent of the total amount of

5

deposits of insured depository institutions in the United States and no more than 30 percent or such lesser or greater amount set by state law of such deposits in that state.

     The Interstate Banking and Branching Act also authorized banks to merge across state lines, thereby creating interstate branches. Under this legislation, each state had the opportunity either to “opt out” of this provision, thereby prohibiting interstate branching in such states, or to “opt in”. The State of North Carolina elected to “opt in” to such legislation. Furthermore, pursuant to the Interstate Banking and Branching Act, a bank is now able to open new branches in a state in which it does not already have banking operations, if the laws of such state permit such de novo branching.

     The USA PATRIOT Act. After the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C., the United States government acted in several ways to tighten control on activities perceived to be connected to money laundering and terrorist funding. A series of orders were issued which identify terrorists and terrorist organizations and require the blocking of property and assets of, as well as prohibiting all transactions or dealings with, such terrorists, terrorist organizations and those that assist or sponsor them. The USA Patriot Act substantially broadens existing anti-money laundering legislation and the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the United States, imposes new compliance and due diligence obligations, creates new crimes and penalties, compels the production of documents located both inside and outside the United States, including those of foreign institutions that have a correspondent relationship in the United States, and clarifies the safe harbor from civil liability to customers. In addition, the United States Treasury Department issued regulations in cooperation with the federal banking agencies, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and the Department of Justice to require customer identification and verification, expand the money-laundering program requirement to the major financial services sectors, including insurance and unregistered investment companies, such as hedge funds, and facilitate and permit the sharing of information between law enforcement and financial institutions, as well as among financial institutions themselves. The United States Treasury Department also has created the Treasury USA PATRIOT Act Task Force to work with other financial regulators, the regulated community, law enforcement and consumers to continually improve the regulations.

     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. On July 30, 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was enacted which addresses corporate governance and securities reporting requirements. Among its requirements are changes in auditing and accounting, executive compensation, certifications by Chief Executive Officers and Chief Financial Officers of certain securities filings, expanded reporting of information in current reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, more detailed reporting information in securities disclosure documents and more timely filings of corporate information. The Nasdaq National Market has also issued its corporate governance rules that are intended to allow shareholders to more easily and efficiently monitor the performance and activities of companies and their executive officers and directors.

     Regulation of FCB. FCB is organized as a North Carolina state chartered bank subject to regulation, supervision and examination by the Federal Reserve and NC Banking Commission, and to regulation by the FDIC. The federal and state laws and regulations are applicable to required reserves against deposits, allowable investments, loans, mergers, consolidations, issuance of securities, payment of dividends, establishment of branches, limitations on credit to subsidiaries and other aspects of the business of such subsidiaries. The federal and state banking agencies have broad authority and discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies involving the classification of assets and the establishment of loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. Such actions by the regulators prohibit member banks from engaging in unsafe or unsound banking practices. The Bank is also subject to certain reserve requirements established by the Federal Reserve Board and is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Atlanta, which is one of the 12 regional banks comprising the FHLB System.

6

Capital and Operational Requirements

     The Federal Reserve and the FDIC issued substantially similar minimum capital adequacy standards of which both the Corporation and the Bank must comply. The risk-based guidelines define a three-tier capital framework, under which the Corporation and the Bank are required to maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 Capital (as defined) to total risk-weighted assets of 4.00 percent and a minimum ratio of Total Capital (as defined) to risk weighted assets of 8.00 percent. Tier 1 Capital generally consists of total shareholders’ equity calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles less certain intangibles. Tier 2 Capital includes, among other items, cumulative perpetual preferred stock, long-term preferred stock, hybrid capital instruments, qualifying subordinated debt, and the allowance for credit losses up to 1.25 percent of risk-weighted assets. Tier 3 capital includes subordinated debt that is unsecured, fully paid, has an original maturity of at least two years, is not redeemable before maturity without prior approval of the Federal Reserve and includes a lock-in clause precluding payment of either interest or principal if the payment would cause the issuing bank’s risk-based capital ratio to fall or remain below the required minimum. The sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 Capital less investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries is equal to qualifying total capital. Risk-based capital ratios are calculated by dividing Tier 1 and Total Capital by risk-weighted assets. Risk-weighted assets refer to the on- and off-balance sheet exposures of the Corporation and the Bank, as adjusted for one of four categories of applicable risk-weights established in Federal Reserve regulations, based primarily on relative credit risk. At December 31, 2003, the Corporation and the Bank were in compliance with the risk-based capital requirements. The Corporation’s Tier 1 and Total Capital Ratios at December 31, 2003 were 10.00 percent and 10.97 percent, respectively. The Corporation did not have any subordinated debt that qualified as Tier 3 Capital at December 31, 2003.

     The leverage ratio is calculated by dividing Tier 1 Capital by adjusted total assets. The Corporation’s leverage ratio at December 31, 2003 was 6.53 percent. The Corporation meets its leverage ratio requirement.

     In addition to the above described capital requirements, the federal regulatory agencies may from time to time require that a banking organization maintain capital above the minimum levels whether because of its financial condition or actual or anticipated growth.

     Prompt Corrective Action under FDICIA. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991 (“FDICIA”), among other things, identifies five capital categories for insured depository institutions (well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized) and requires the respective federal regulatory agencies to implement systems for “prompt corrective action” for insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements within such categories. FDICIA imposes progressively more restrictive constraints on operations, management and capital distributions, depending on the category in which an institution is classified. Failure to meet the capital guidelines could also subject a banking institution to capital raising requirements. In addition, pursuant to FDICIA, the various regulatory agencies have prescribed certain non-capital standards for safety and soundness relating generally to operations and management, asset quality and executive compensation, and such agencies may take action against a financial institution that does not meet the applicable standards.

     The various regulatory agencies have adopted substantially similar regulations that define the five capital categories identified by FDICIA, using the Total Risk-Based Capital, Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital and Leverage Capital Ratios as the relevant capital measures. Such regulations establish various degrees of corrective action to be taken when an institution is considered undercapitalized. Under the regulations, a “well capitalized” institution must have (1) a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 6.00 percent, (2) a Total Capital ratio of at least 10.00 percent, (3) a Leverage ratio of at least 5.00 percent and (4) not be subject to a capital directive order. An “adequately capitalized” institution must have a Tier 1 Capital ratio of at least 4.00 percent, a Total Capital ratio of at least 8.00 percent and a leverage ratio of at least 4.00 percent, or 3.00 percent in some cases. Under these guidelines, FCB is considered well capitalized as of December 31, 2003. See Note Nineteen of the consolidated financial statements.

7

     Banking agencies have also adopted regulations which mandate that regulators take into consideration (i) concentrations of credit risk, (ii) interest rate risk (when the interest rate sensitivity of an institution’s assets does not match the sensitivity of its liabilities or its off-balance sheet position) and (iii) risks from non-traditional activities, as well as an institution’s ability to manage those risks, when determining the adequacy of an institution’s capital. This evaluation is made as a part of the institution’s regular safety and soundness examination. In addition, the banking agencies have amended their regulatory capital guidelines to incorporate a measure for market risk. In accordance with amended guidelines, a Corporation or Bank with significant trading activity (as defined in the amendment) must incorporate a measure for market risk in its regulatory capital calculations. The revised guidelines do not materially impact the Corporation’s or FCB’s regulatory capital ratios or FCB’s well-capitalized status.

     Distributions. The primary source of funds for distributions paid by the Corporation to its shareholders is dividends received from FCB. Federal regulatory and other requirements, as well as laws and regulations of the State of North Carolina, restrict the lending of funds by FCB to the Corporation and the amount of dividends that FCB can pay to the Corporation. The Federal Reserve regulates the amount of FCB dividends payable to the Corporation based on net profits for the current year combined with the undivided profits for the last two years, less dividends already paid. See Note Twenty of the consolidated financial statements.

     In addition to the foregoing, the ability of the Corporation and FCB to pay dividends may be affected by the various minimum capital requirements and the capital and non-capital standards established under FDICIA, as described above. Furthermore, if in the opinion of a federal regulatory agency, a bank under its jurisdiction is engaged in or is about to engage in an unsafe or unsound practice (which, depending on the financial condition of the bank, could include the payment of dividends), such agency may require, after notice and hearing, that such bank cease and desist from such practice. The right of the Corporation, its shareholders and its creditors to participate in any distribution of assets or earnings of FCB is further subject to the prior claims of creditors against the Bank.

     Deposit Insurance. The deposits of FCB are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC. As insurer, the FDIC is authorized to conduct examinations of, and to require reporting by FDIC-insured institutions. It also may prohibit any FDIC-insured institution from engaging in any activity the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a serious threat to the FDIC. The FDIC also has the authority to initiate enforcement actions against banking institutions, after giving the institution’s primary regulator an opportunity to take such action. In addition, the Bank is subject to deposit premium assessments by the FDIC. As mandated by FDICIA, the FDIC has adopted regulations for a risk-based insurance assessment system. Under this system, the assessment rates for an insured depository institution vary according to the level of risk incurred in its activities. To arrive at a risk assessment for a banking institution, the FDIC places it in one of nine risk categories using a process based on capital ratios and on other relevant information from supervisory evaluations of the bank by the bank’s primary federal regulator, the Federal Reserve, statistical analyses of financial statements and other relevant information.

     The deposits of FCB are insured by the BIF, administered by the FDIC. Under the FDIC’s risk-based insurance system, assessments currently can range from no assessment to an assessment of 27 basis points per $100 of insured deposits, with the exact assessment determined by a bank’s capital and other regulatory factors. The range of deposit insurance assessment rates can change from time to time, in the discretion of the FDIC, subject to certain limits. Presently FCB is not required to pay any additional assessment to the FDIC. However, the FDIC has publicly stated that its BIF will soon fall below its mandatory reserve limit and that such an event would likely trigger additional premiums for all banks. At this time, the amount of any future premiums required to be paid by FCB is not known.

     Source of Strength. According to Federal Reserve policy, bank holding companies are expected to act as a source of financial strength to subsidiary banks and to commit resources to support each such subsidiary. This support may be required at times when a bank holding company may not be able to provide such support. Similarly, under the cross-guaranty provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, in the event of a loss suffered or anticipated by the FDIC, either as a result of default of a banking or thrift subsidiary of the Corporation or related to FDIC assistance provided to a subsidiary in danger of default,

8

the other banking subsidiaries of the Registrant may be assessed for the FDIC’s loss, subject to certain exceptions.

     Future Legislation. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the banking industry are frequently introduced in Congress, in the state legislatures and before the various bank regulatory agencies. The likelihood and timing of any such proposals or bills being enacted and the impact they might have on the Corporation and FCB cannot be determined at this time.

     Regulatory Recommendations. Management is not presently aware of any current recommendations to the Corporation or to the Bank by regulatory authorities, which, if they were to be implemented, would have a material effect on the Corporation’s liquidity, capital resources, or operations.

     During the third quarter of 2003, the Bank entered into a written agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Office of the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks, the Bank’s primary federal and state regulatory agencies. The agreement arises out of certain previously disclosed regulatory examinations and requires the Bank to take appropriate actions to improve its programs and procedures for complying with the Currency and Foreign Transactions Reporting Act and the anti-money laundering provisions of Regulation H of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The Bank has subsequently taken substantial actions, and adopted and implemented a number of policies and procedures, to address the concerns of the regulatory agencies.

Other Considerations

     There are particular risks and uncertainties that are applicable to an investment in our common stock. Specifically, there are risks and uncertainties that bear on our future financial results that may cause our future earnings and financial condition to be less than our expectations. Some of the risks and uncertainties relate to economic conditions generally, and would affect other financial institutions in similar ways. These aspects are discussed under the heading “Factors that May Affect Future Results” in the accompanying “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. This section addresses particular risks and uncertainties that are specific to our business.

Available Information

     The Corporation’s Internet address is www.FirstCharter.com. The Corporation makes available, free of charge, on or through its website, its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and beneficial ownership reports on Forms 3, 4 and 5 as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with, or furnishing it to, the Securities Exchange Commission.

Item 2. Properties

     The principal offices of the Corporation are located in the 230,000 square foot First Charter Center located at 10200 David Taylor Drive in Charlotte, North Carolina, which is owned by the Bank through its subsidiaries. The First Charter Center contains the corporate offices of the Corporation as well as the operations, mortgage loan and data processing departments of FCB.

     In addition to its main office, FCB has 54 financial centers, five insurance offices and 93 ATMs located in 17 counties throughout North Carolina. As of December 31, 2003, the Corporation and its subsidiaries owned 36 financial center locations, leased 18 financial center locations and leased five insurance offices. The Corporation also leases a facility in Reston, Virginia for the origination of real estate loans. These operations also serve as a holding company for certain subsidiaries that own real estate and real estate-related assets, including first and second residential mortgage loans. In addition, the Corporation leases a facility in Winston-Salem, North Carolina for the operations of our third party benefits administrator.

9

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

     The Corporation and the Bank are defendants in certain claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated operations, liquidity or financial position of the Corporation or the Bank.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     There were no matters submitted to a vote of shareholders during the quarter ended December 31, 2003.

Item 4A. Executive Officers of the Registrant

     The following list sets forth with respect to each of the current executive officers of the registrant his or her name, age, positions and offices held with the Registrant and the Bank, the period served in such positions or offices and, if such person has served in such position and office for less than five years, the prior employment of such person.

10

PART II

Item 5. Market For Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Shareholder Matters

     The principal market on which the Common Stock is traded is the Nasdaq National Market. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the Common Stock for the periods indicated, as reported on the Nasdaq National Market:

     As of March 5, 2004, there were 7,660 record holders of the Corporation’s Common Stock. During 2002 and 2003, the Corporation paid dividends on the Common Stock on a quarterly basis. The following table sets forth dividends declared per share of Common Stock for the periods indicated:

     For additional information regarding the Corporation’s ability to pay dividends, see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Capital Resources.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

     See Table One in Item 7 for Selected Financial Data.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation and the notes thereto.

11

Factors that May Affect Future Results

     The following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements about the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations, which are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s judgment only as of the date hereof. The Corporation undertakes no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events and circumstances that arise after the date hereof.

     Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward looking statements include, among others, the following possibilities: (1) projected results in connection with the implementation of our business plan and strategic initiatives are lower than expected; (2) competitive pressure among financial services companies increases significantly; (3) costs or difficulties related to the integration of acquisitions or expenses in general are greater than expected; (4) general economic conditions, in the markets in which the Corporation does business, are less favorable than expected; (5) risks inherent in making loans, including repayment risks and risks associated with collateral values, are greater than expected; (6) changes in the interest rate environment reduce interest margins and affect funding sources; (7) changes in market rates and prices may adversely affect the value of financial products; (8) legislation or regulatory requirements or changes thereto adversely affect the businesses in which the Corporation is engaged; (9) regulatory compliance cost increases are greater than expected; and (10) decisions to change the business mix of the Corporation.

Overview

     The Corporation is a bank holding company established as a North Carolina Corporation in 1983, with one wholly-owned banking subsidiary, FCB. The Corporation’s principal executive offices are located in Charlotte, North Carolina. FCB is a full service bank and trust company with 54 financial centers and five insurance offices located in 17 counties throughout the piedmont and western half of North Carolina. The Corporation also maintains operations in Reston, Virginia for the origination of real estate loans. These operations also serve as a holding company for certain subsidiaries that own real estate and real estate-related assets, including first and second residential mortgage loans.

     The Corporation’s primary market area is located within North Carolina and predominately centers around the Metro region of Charlotte, North Carolina, including Mecklenburg County and its surrounding counties. Charlotte is the twenty-sixth largest city in the United States and has a diverse economic base. Primary business sectors in the Charlotte Metro region include banking and finance, insurance, manufacturing, health care, transportation, retail, telecommunications, government services and education. The Corporation believes that it is not dependent on any one or a few types of commerce due to the economic diversity of the region; however, North Carolina was one of the states hardest hit by the recent recession. Over the last two years, personal income growth in North Carolina of 4.63 percent lagged the growth of its neighbors, Georgia, 6.23 percent, and Virginia, 6.06 percent. Since the North Carolina economy has historically relied on the manufacturing and transportation sectors, it has been significantly impacted by global competition and rising energy prices. As a result, the North Carolina economy is transitioning to a more service oriented economy. Currently, the finance and insurance industries have shown the most growth. The unemployment rate for the Charlotte Metro region was 6.2 percent in December 2003 compared to 5.7 percent in December 2002. This is the result of several layoffs in the manufacturing sector. The increased unemployment rates reflect the structural changes taking place in the economy of the Charlotte Metro region. The service industry is now the major employer followed by wholesale and retail trade. Two other sectors have begun to emerge as significant contributors, education and health services along with the leisure and hospitality sectors. While commercial real estate lending is still not at levels seen before the recession, there has been an increase in activity. During the third quarter, there was some speculative development and a steady stream of property acquisitions and expansions in the office, mixed use, retail and industrial sectors. For those areas suffering from the decline of manufacturing, not only is unemployment high, but there is also a large amount of textile manufacturing and warehouse space on the market.

12

     The Corporation’s operations are divided into five primary lines of business: community banking, mortgage, brokerage, insurance, and financial management. Community banking provides a variety of depository accounts including interest bearing and non-interest bearing checking accounts, certificates of deposit and money market accounts. In addition, community banking offers numerous loan products including commercial, consumer, real estate and home equity loans. The community bank also maintains 93 ATM’s and enables customers to access their accounts on-line. The mortgage business provides both fixed-rate and variable-rate mortgage products and loan servicing. First Charter Brokerage Services offers full service and discount brokerage services, annuity sales and financial planning services pursuant to a third party arrangement with UVEST Investment Services. First Charter Insurance Services, Inc. is a North Carolina corporation formed to meet the insurance needs of businesses and individuals throughout the Charlotte Metro region. Financial management provides comprehensive financial planning, funds management, investments and record keeping services for many national companies.

     The Corporation derives interest income through traditional banking activities such as generating loans and earning interest on securities. Additional sources of income are derived from fees on deposit accounts and from our various lines of business including mortgage, brokerage, insurance and financial management. Also, as a part of the Corporation’s management of its securities portfolio, income is recognized on the sale of bond and equity securities.

     Improving the net interest margin is critical to the Corporation’s strategy to grow earnings. The declining interest rate environment has continued to compress the net interest margin as assets repriced faster than liabilities due to the asset sensitive nature of the Corporation’s balance sheet. In addition, the margin was impacted by lower effective yields on mortgage-backed securities due to increased amortization of premiums resulting from increased prepayment speeds of the underlying mortgages. The Corporation has recently taken major steps towards improving earnings. In 2003, the Corporation prepaid $131 million in longer-term, fixed rate Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) advances to improve the net interest margin. The Corporation also restructured the securities available for sale portfolio to stabilize cash flows and improve the effective yields in the portfolio. In addition, during the first quarter of 2004, the Corporation entered into a series of interest rate swap agreements which is expected to lower interest expense in 2004.

     Maintaining sound asset quality is a major focus for the Corporation. Several steps were taken in 2003 to improve asset quality. The Corporation sold $60.9 million in nonaccruing and accruing higher risk loans to improve the asset quality of the loan portfolio and to contain the financial risk of these loans. The Corporation anticipated that significant future collections costs would be eliminated while allowing the Corporation to focus additional efforts on growing traditional banking activities and additional sources of income discussed above. Also, the Corporation sold its $11.7 million credit card portfolio in the first quarter of 2003. The sale of the consumer credit card balances was a strategic decision that will allow First Charter to continue to offer a First Charter credit card through MBNA and continue to receive ongoing fee income. These changes are expected to reduce the credit risk profile of the Corporation, which should have a positive impact on earnings. Nevertheless, the business of lending to commercial and consumer customers carries with it significant credit risk, which must be continually managed. Management monitors asset quality and credit risk on an ongoing basis.

     The Corporation faces competition from other banks, savings and loan associations, savings banks, credit unions, finance companies and major retail stores that offer competing financial services. Many of these competitors have greater resources, broader geographic coverage and higher lending limits than the Corporation.

     The Corporation faces the challenge of retaining existing customers and attracting new customers. The Corporation’s primary methods of competition are to provide exceptional customer service and fairly priced products. The Corporation uses a quarterly independent survey of customers to review its level of customer service. For 2003, customer satisfaction scores surpassed the Corporation’s threshold of 75 percent “very satisfied”. The Corporation experienced a 19 percent decrease in the customer attrition ratio and increased opportunities to expand relationships with our customers. Our main strategy for obtaining new customers is our Checking Account Marketing Program (“CHAMP”), a continuous direct mailing

13

campaign. Its success has provided the Corporation with opportunities to develop new customer relationships to generate additional fee income and to shift our funding mix towards lower-cost funding sources. To meet the needs of existing and potential customers, the Corporation upgraded five branches, opened one new branch, provided extend hours in select branches and its call center and added bilingual personnel. The Corporation will continue to update existing branch and expand into new areas as both market and economic conditions warrant.

     Another challenge for the Corporation is growing fee income through other lines of business. These sources of income provide stability to our earnings with minimal credit risk and less exposure to interest rate risk than our community bank’s traditional lines of business. In addressing this challenge, the Corporation acquired two insurance agencies to expand the reach of our insurance products with businesses and individuals throughout the Charlotte Metro region. In addition, the Corporation acquired a third party benefits administrator which adds new customers, expands our product line and improves our technology platform. As a result of the growth in our other lines of business, we experienced increases in noninterest income in 2003. The Corporation continuously reviews other opportunities for expansion as conditions warrant.

Financial Summary

     In 2003, the results of operations were impacted by several significant events. They include the sale of $60.9 million in nonaccruing and accruing higher risk loans to investors in June 2003 (the “June Loan Sale”), the sale of the Corporation’s credit card portfolio, the restructuring of the securities available for sale portfolio and the prepayment of FHLB longer-term fixed rate advances.

     The June Loan Sale significantly improved the asset quality of the loan portfolio and contained the future financial risk of these loans. The effect of the June Loan Sale negatively impacted the provision for loan losses which is discussed in more detail throughout this section.

     In the first quarter of 2003, the Corporation sold its $11.7 million credit card portfolio for a gain of $2.3 million. The sale of the consumer credit card balances was a strategic decision that allows First Charter to continue to offer a First Charter credit card through MBNA and continue to receive ongoing fee income. In addition, the sale of the credit card portfolio improved asset quality as these loans had a higher percentage of allocated allowance for loan losses due to their unsecured nature and higher historical loss experience.

     During 2003, the Corporation identified approximately $12.8 million of residential rental property loans that appeared to have questionable appraisals and collateral value. As a result, the Corporation increased the provision for loan losses by approximately $2.4 million.

     During early 2003, the mortgage-backed securities portfolio produced lower effective yields due to increased amortization of premiums resulting from increased prepayment speeds. As a result, the Corporation restructured the portfolio to stabilize cash flows and improve the effective yields in the portfolio.

     Given the low interest rate environment in 2003, the Corporation prepaid $131 million of longer-term, fixed-rate FHLB advances. These prepayments are expected to lower interest expense $4.7 million or $.11 per diluted share (after-tax) in 2004.

     Net income amounted to $14.1 million, or $0.47 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2003, a decrease from earnings of $39.8 million, or $1.30 per diluted share, for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease was due to several factors. Noninterest expense increased $29.3 million primarily due to $19.1 million of costs associated with the prepayment of FHLB advances, increased professional fees and higher salaries and employee benefits. Provision for loan losses increased $19.2 million due to the June Loan Sale, adverse business conditions and increases in the loan portfolio. Historically low interest rates have compressed the net interest margin during 2003, resulting in a $5.4 million decline in net interest income. A $16.5 million increase in noninterest income was due to continued gains in service

14

charges on deposit accounts, financial management, brokerage, insurance, mortgage and income from Bank Owned Life Insurance (“BOLI”). Income tax expense declined $11.7 million due to a decrease in income and the effective tax rate.

     During 2003, the Corporation experienced strong core business fundamentals in the areas of deposits and customer satisfaction that have created momentum for 2004. The success of CHAMP resulted in 40,995 new checking accounts being opened, which represents a 113 percent increase over 2002. In addition, during 2003, core retail households increased 24 percent to 79,985 primarily due to CHAMP. The results of our customer satisfaction survey remained above 80 percent “very satisfied” during 2003. In addition, the customer attrition ratio decreased 19 percent, which increased opportunities to expand relationships with our customers.

     For the three months ended December 31, 2003, First Charter reported a net loss of $0.5 million or $0.02 per diluted share, a decrease from earnings of $10.5 million or $0.35 per diluted share for the same period in 2002. Earnings were impacted by several factors. Noninterest expense increased $13.8 million due to $11.7 million of costs associated with the prepayment of FHLB advances as compared to $3.3 million in 2002, increased professional fees and higher salaries and employee benefits. Provision for loan losses increased $1.4 million primarily due to increases in the loan portfolio. Noninterest income declined $2.8 million. Increases in services charges, financial management income, insurance income, brokerage income and BOLI were more than offset by declines in gains on sales of securities and trading gains. Net income was positively impacted by a $6.0 million decrease in income tax expense resulting from decreases in income and the 2003 effective tax rate. Net interest income increased $0.9 million. A decline in interest income was more than offset by a decline in interest expense due to a shift in the deposit mix from higher-cost certificates of deposit to low-cost core deposits and the effects of refinancing FHLB long-term fixed rate advances.

15

Table One
Selected Financial Data

(1)

First Charter Corporation historical cash dividends declared.

(2)

Noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income less gain on sale of securities.

16

Critical Accounting Policies

     The Corporation’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations. The Corporation’s significant accounting policies are discussed in detail in Note One of the consolidated financial statements.

Allowance for Loan Losses

     The Corporation considers its policy regarding the allowance for loan losses to be one of its most critical accounting policies because it requires management’s most subjective and complex judgments. The Corporation has developed appropriate policies and procedures for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, recognizing that this process requires a number of assumptions and estimates with respect to its loan portfolio.

     The determination of the level of the allowance and, correspondingly, the provision for loan losses, rests upon various judgments and assumptions, including: (i) general economic conditions, (ii) loan portfolio composition, (iii) prior loan loss experience, (iv) management’s evaluation of credit risk related to both individual borrowers and pools of loans and (v) observations derived from the Corporation’s ongoing internal audit and examination processes and those of its regulators.

     The first component of the allowance for loan losses, the valuation allowance for impaired and certain classified loans, is computed based on documented reviews performed by the Corporation’s Credit Risk Management. The reviews are completed for impaired commercial relationships greater than $150,000 and classified relationships greater than $250,000. Credit Risk Management typically estimates these valuation allowances by considering the fair value of the underlying collateral for each impaired loan using current appraisals or estimates of values. The results of these estimates are updated quarterly or periodically as circumstances change. Changes in the dollar amount of impaired loans or in the estimates of the fair value of the underlying collateral can impact the valuation allowance on impaired loans and, therefore, the overall allowance for loan losses.

     The second component of the allowance for loan losses, the portion attributable to all other loans without specific reserve amounts, is determined by applying historical loss rates to the outstanding balance of loans. The portfolio is segmented into two major categories: commercial loans and consumer loans, which include mortgage, general consumer, consumer real estate, home equity and consumer unsecured. Commercial loans are segmented further by risk grade, so that separate loss factors are applied to each pool of commercial loans. The historical loss factors applied to the commercial segments are determined using a migration analysis tool that computes current loss estimates by credit grade using a trailing loss history database. Since the migration analysis is based on trailing data, the percentage loss estimates can change based on actual losses. Changes in commercial loan credit grades or in the mix of the portfolio can also impact this component of the allowance for loan losses from period to period. Consumer loans are segmented further by collateral types in order to apply separate loss factors to each pool of consumer loans. The historical loss factors applied to the consumer segments are a twelve-month rolling average of losses. Since the loss factors are based on historical data, the percentage loss estimates can change based on actual losses.

     The third component of the allowance for loan losses is intended to capture the various risk elements of the loan portfolio which may not be sufficiently captured in the historical loss rates. These factors currently include intrinsic risk, operational risk and concentration risk. Intrinsic risk relates to the impact of current economic conditions on the Corporation’s borrower base, the effects of which may not be realized by the Corporation in the form of charge-offs for several periods. The Corporation monitors and documents various local, regional and national economic data, and makes subjective estimates of the impact of changes in economic conditions on the allowance for loan losses. Operational risk includes factors such as the likelihood of loss on a loan due to procedural error. Historically, the Corporation has made additional loss estimates for certain types of loans that were either acquired from other institutions in mergers or were underwritten using policies that are no longer in effect at the Corporation. These identified loans are considered to have higher risk of loss than currently reflected in historical loss rates of the Corporation, so additional estimates of loss are made by management. Concentration risk includes the

17

risk of loss due to extensions of credit to a particular industry, loan type or borrower that may be troubled. The Corporation monitors its portfolio for any excessive concentrations of loans during each period, and if any excessive concentrations are noted, estimates of loss would be made. Changes in the allowance for loan losses for these subjective factors can arise from changes in the balance and types of outstanding loans, as well as changes in the underlying conditions which drive a change in the percentage used. As more fully discussed below, the Corporation continually monitors the portfolio in an effort to identify any other factors which may have an impact on loss estimates within the portfolio.

     All estimates of the loan portfolio risk, including the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, are subject to general and local economic conditions, among other factors, which are unpredictable and beyond the Corporation’s control. Since a significant portion of the loan portfolio is comprised of real estate loans and loans to area businesses, the Corporation is subject to continued risk that the real estate market and economic conditions in general could continue to change and therefore result in additional losses and require increases in the provision for loan losses. If management had made different assumptions about probable loan losses, the Corporation’s financial position and results of operations could have differed materially. For additional discussion concerning the Corporation’s allowance for loan losses and related matters, see Allowance for Loan Losses.

Equity Method Investments

     The Corporation’s equity method investments represent investments in venture capital limited partnerships. The Corporation’s recognition of earnings or losses from an equity method investment is determined by the Corporation’s share of the investee’s earnings on a quarterly basis (or, in the case of some smaller investments, on an annual basis if there has been no significant change in values). The limited partnerships generally provide their financial information during the quarter after the end of a given period, and the Corporation’s policy is to record its share of earnings or losses on these equity method investments in the quarter such information was received.

     These limited partnerships record their investments in investee companies on a fair value basis, with changes in the underlying fair values being reflected as an adjustment to their earnings in the period such changes are determined. The earnings of these limited partnerships, and therefore the amount recorded on an equity-method basis by the Corporation, are impacted significantly by changes in the underlying value of the companies in which these limited partnerships invest. All of the companies in which these limited partnerships invest are privately held, and their market values are not readily available. Estimations of these values are made by the management of the limited partnerships and are reviewed by the Corporation’s management for reasonableness. The assumptions in the valuation of these investments include the viability of the business model, the ability of the investee company to obtain alternative financing, the ability to generate revenues in future periods and other subjective factors. Given the inherent risks associated with this type of investment in the current economic environment, there can be no guarantee that there will not be widely varying gains or losses on these equity method investments in future periods. If management of the limited partnerships had made different assumptions about the valuation of these investments, the Corporation’s financial position and results of operations could have differed materially.

     At December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 the total book value of equity method investments was $2.8 million and $3.8 million, respectively, and is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet. Of the $2.8 million, $1.1 million represents investments in venture capital partnerships, which invest primarily in equity securities. The remaining $1.7 million is invested in Small Business Investment Companies (SBICs), which make debt investments that qualify for the investment test under the Community Reinvestment Act. At December 31, 2003, the Corporation’s remaining commitment to fund the equity method investments was $2.4 million and represented commitments to venture funds that are SBICs. These remaining commitments are callable in 2004.

Derivative Investments

     In the first quarter of 2004, the Corporation entered into a series of interest rate swap agreements to provide an exchange of interest payments computed on notional amounts that will offset any undesirable

18

change in fair value resulting from market rate changes on designated hedged items. See Note Twenty-One of the consolidated financial statements for more information on subsequent events.

     The Corporation intends to account for these interest rate swaps as a hedge of the fair value of the related FHLB advances. Accordingly, in future periods the Corporation will record, in noninterest income, the net change in the fair value of the interest rate swap and the related FHLB advances, provided the criteria for hedge accounting continues to be met. In the event such criteria are not met in a future period, the Corporation will cease recording the change in fair value of the FHLB advances and will amortize into earnings the then carrying value of the interest rate swap over the life of the hedged item.

     The Corporation formally documents at inception all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133. The Corporation will discontinue hedge accounting when it is determined that a derivative is not expected to be or has ceased to be highly effective as a hedge, and will reflect changes in fair value through the income statement.

Earnings Performance

Net Interest Income and Margin

     Net interest income, the difference between total interest income and total interest expense, is the Corporation’s principal source of earnings. An analysis of the Corporation’s net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis and average balance sheets for the last three years is presented in Table Two. The changes in net interest income (on a taxable-equivalent basis) from year to year are analyzed in Table Three.

     For the year ended December 31, 2003, net interest income amounted to $107.8 million, a decrease of approximately 4.7 percent from net interest income of $113.2 million in 2002. The decrease in net interest income was mainly due to lower interest income on earning assets resulting from the continued effects of the declining interest rate environment. The Corporation sold $60.9 million in nonaccruing and accruing higher risk loans in the second quarter of 2003 and $11.7 million in credit card loans in the first quarter of 2003. The reinvestment of these proceeds was made in lower yielding securities. In addition, the Corporation sold $70 million in bonds in the fourth quarter of 2002 and reinvested the proceeds into BOLI. This investment is classified as an other asset on the balance sheet, and the income is recognized as other noninterest income rather than being recognized as interest income. Also, during 2003, the mortgage-backed securities portfolio produced lower effective yields due to increased amortization of premiums resulting from increased prepayment speeds of underlying mortgages. As a result, the Corporation sold approximately $372 million of these mortgage-backed securities in order to stabilize cash flows and to improve effective yields in this portfolio. These proceeds were reinvested in fixed term agency securities and mortgage-backed securities of a shorter average life and at a lower current coupon. The BOLI transaction, loan sales and the investment portfolio restructuring resulted in a change in the mix of earning assets from higher yielding loans to lower yielding securities. The decrease in interest income was partially offset by a $12.7 million decrease in interest expense. This decrease was due to a decline in interest rates across the yield curve, a shift in funding sources from higher cost retail certificates of deposit to lower cost transaction based accounts and the benefits from the refinancing of $131 million of FHLB fixed-term advances in 2003 and $100 million of FHLB fixed-term advances late in 2002.

     The net interest margin (tax adjusted net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets) decreased 55 basis points to 3.00 percent in 2003, compared to 3.55 percent in 2002. The decrease reflects the impact of the declining interest rate environment, which continued to compress the net interest margin as assets repriced faster than liabilities due to the asset sensitive nature of the Corporation’s balance sheet. In addition, reinvestment rates of assets were lower than rates earned by assets previously on the balance sheet. If interest rates remain stable in 2004, Management expects the net interest margin to remain near the fourth quarter 2003 level of 3.10 percent. The primary objective of interest rate risk management is to minimize the effect changes in interest rates have on the net interest margin while maintaining an appropriate interest rate risk profile.

19

     Average interest earning assets increased $400.6 million to $3.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $3.26 billion for the same 2002 period. This increase was primarily due to a $338.2 million increase in the Corporation’s average securities available for sale. The increase in average securities available for sale was due to the securitization of $286.9 million of mortgage loans held for sale and the net purchases of securities used to increase earning assets. Early in the first quarter of 2003, the Corporation increased its securities available for sale portfolio to offset the effects of weak loan demand. Average interest earning assets increased due to growth in the Corporation’s average loans and loans held for sale portfolio, which increased $29.9 million mainly due to fourth quarter loan growth. The increase in average loans and loans held for sale was partially offset by the June Loan Sale, the sale of $11.7 million of credit card loans and the mortgage loan securitizations.

     In addition to the increase in average interest earning assets, the Corporation experienced an increase in average interest bearing liabilities. Average deposits increased $234.5 million during 2003. A major contributor to the decrease in interest expense was a shift in average deposits from higher-cost certificates of deposits to lower cost transaction based accounts. While certificates of deposits declined on average $26.3 million, noninterest bearing and other core deposit categories increased $260.8 million, primarily due to the continued success of CHAMP. During 2003, average other borrowings increased $253.6 million and were used to fund loan growth and securities purchases.

     The following table includes for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 interest income on interest earning assets and related average yields, as well as interest expense on interest bearing liabilities and related average rates paid. In addition, the table includes the net interest margin. Average balances were calculated based on daily balances.

Table Two
Average Balances and Net Interest Income Analysis

⁽¹⁾ The preceding analysis takes into consideration the principal amount of nonaccruing loans and only income actually collected and recognized on such loans.

⁽²⁾ Average loan balances are shown net of unearned income.

⁽³⁾ Includes amortization of deferred loan fees of approximately $2,576, $2,187, and $3,807, for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

⁽⁴⁾ Yields on nontaxable securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis, assuming a Federal tax rate of 35 percent, applicable state taxes and TEFRA disallowances for 2003, 2002 and 2001. The adjustments made to convert to a taxable-equivalent basis were $2,241, $2,714, and $1,904 for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

20

     The following table presents the changes in net interest income between the years ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 and between the years ended December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001.

Table Three
Volume and Rate Variance Analysis

⁽¹⁾ The changes for each category of income and expense are divided between the portion of change attributable to the variance in rate or volume for that category. The amount of change that cannot be separated is allocated to each variance proportionately.

⁽²⁾ Income on nontaxable securities and loans are stated on a taxable-equivalent basis. Refer to Table Two for further details.

Noninterest Income

     The major components of noninterest income are derived from service charges on deposit accounts as well as other banking products and services from our various lines of business including brokerage, mortgage, insurance and financial management. In addition, the Corporation realizes gains from the sale of bond and equity securities and income from our investment in BOLI.

     Noninterest income increased $16.5 million, or 35 percent, to $64.2 million compared to the same period in 2002. The increase was due to several factors. Net losses from equity method investments amounted to $0.3 million in 2003 versus net losses of $5.8 million for 2002. The Corporation’s investment in BOLI resulted in a $3.9 million increase in income as the product was purchased late in the fourth quarter of 2002. Service charges on deposit accounts increased $3.0 million due to growth in checking accounts and increased activity. In the first quarter of 2003, the Corporation sold its credit card portfolio for a gain of $2.3 million. Financial management income increased $1.3 million primarily due to the purchase of a third party benefits administrator in the third quarter of 2003. Mortgage services income increased $0.7 million, which was driven by record refinancing volume based on record low interest rates. Brokerage revenues increased $0.7 million as customers began to return to the equities market. Insurance services income increased $0.6 million partly due to the acquisition of two insurance agencies. Other noninterest income increased $0.6 million due to increased ATM fees, merchant income and mortgage servicing income. These improvements were partially offset by a $1.3 million reduction in gains on sales of securities and a $0.3 million decrease in trading gains. In addition, gains on the sale of bank property amounted to $0.4 million and $0.9 million for 2003 and 2002, respectively.

21

     The following table compares noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Table Four
Noninterest Income

Noninterest Expense

     Noninterest expense is primarily comprised of operating expenses for the Corporation. The major components are salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, professional fees and other operating expenses.

     Noninterest expense totaled $127.0 million at December 31, 2003, an increase of $29.3 million compared to 2002. The variance includes a $19.1 million cost associated with prepaying $131 million in longer-term, fixed rate Federal Home Loan Bank advances in 2003 versus a $3.3 million cost associated with prepaying $100 million in longer-term, fixed rate Federal Home Loan Bank advances in 2002. In addition, noninterest expense was affected by a $5.0 million increase in professional fees primarily due to the previously mentioned loan sale, consulting services related to the review and revision of our procedures to comply with the Bank Secrecy Act, consulting services to ensure compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and fees related to the investigation and collection of questionable residential rental property loans. Noninterest expense was also impacted by a $4.7 million increase in salaries and employee benefits due to additional personnel, including the acquisition of a third party benefits administrator and two insurance agencies, increased medical expenses and increased commission-based compensation due to increased revenue in our mortgage, brokerage and insurance services areas. These increases were partially offset by lower incentive compensation and employee benefit accruals. Other items impacting noninterest expense were a $1.9 million increase in marketing expense primarily associated with the implementation of CHAMP and a $1.0 million increase in other operating expense primarily due to increased mortgage servicing fees, non-credit losses and other miscellaneous expenses. Management anticipates a decline in noninterest expense of approximately 10 percent in 2004 because Management does not anticipate incurring any cost on prepaying borrowings and professional fees are expected to decline as several projects near completion.

     The efficiency ratio, noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income less gain on the sale of securities, increased to 77.49 percent for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to 64.34 percent for the year-ended December 31, 2002. A significant portion of the increase in the efficiency ratio relates to the $19.1 million of costs associated with the prepayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and the previously discussed $5.0 million increase in professional fees. Gains on sale of securities of $10.3 million and $11.5 million are excluded from this calculation for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

22

     The following table compares noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002.

Table Five
Noninterest Expense

Income Tax Expense

     The income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 amounted to $3.3 million for an effective tax rate of 18.9 percent, compared to $14.9 million for an effective tax rate of 27.3 percent for the year ended December 31, 2002. The decrease in the income tax expense and the effective tax rate for 2003 was attributable to the decrease in taxable income relative to nontaxable components of earnings. Management anticipates the 2004 effective tax rate to range from 31 to 33 percent. The Corporation’s North Carolina tax returns for 1999, 2000 and 2001, are currently undergoing an audit by the North Carolina Department of Revenue. Management does not expect any significant, adverse impact to its results of operations arising from this examination.

23

     The following table provides certain selected quarterly financial data:

Table Six
Selected Quarterly Financial Data

⁽¹⁾ Annualized

⁽²⁾ Noninterest expense divided by the sum of taxable equivalent net interest income plus noninterest income less gain on sale of securities.

Business Segments

     The Corporation’s operations are divided into five operating segments: commercial banking, brokerage, insurance, mortgage and financial management. These segments are identified based on the Corporation’s organizational structure, and the Corporation’s chief operating decision makers review separate results of operations of each of these operating segments. For purposes of segment reporting, the Corporation has only one reportable segment, FCB, the Corporation’s primary banking subsidiary. FCB provides businesses and individuals with commercial loans, retail loans, and deposit banking services. Brokerage, insurance, mortgage and financial management are reported as other operating segments. Of these segments, the results of operations of FCB constitute a substantial majority of the consolidated net income, revenues and assets of the Corporation, as set forth in Note Two of the

24

consolidated financial statements. Included in “Other” are revenue, expenses and assets of the parent company and eliminations.

     The following table for First Charter’s reportable business segment compares total income for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002:

Table Seven
Business Segment Net Income (Loss)

     FCB’s net income was $15.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to $44.0 million for the same year ago period. The decrease was primarily due to (i) a $26.4 million increase in noninterest expense which was comprised of: prepayment cost associated with the refinancing of $131 million of longer-term, fixed rate FHLB advances; increased professional fees due to the June Loan Sale, consulting fees to ensure compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the review and revision of our procedures for compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act, fees related to the investigation and collection of questionable residential rental property loans and increased marketing expense associated with the implementation of CHAMP, (ii) a $19.2 million increase in the provision for loan losses arising from the June Loan Sale, adverse business conditions and increases in the loan portfolio and (iii) a $5.6 million decrease in net interest income due to lower interest income on earning assets partially offset by a decrease in interest expense resulting from the continued effects of a declining interest rate environment. This decrease was partially offset by a $13.0 million decrease in income tax expense due to a decrease in taxable income and the effective tax rate and a $9.3 million increase in noninterest income resulting from the Corporation’s investment in BOLI, growth in services charges on deposit accounts and from gain on the sale of the credit card portfolio. Management anticipates a decline in noninterest expense of approximately 10 percent in 2004 because Management does not anticipate incurring any cost on prepaying borrowings and professional fees are expected to decline as several projects near completion.

     Other operating segments reported a net loss of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to a net loss of $0.9 million for the same year ago period. The decrease in the net loss was primarily due to higher noninterest income due to increases in brokerage services revenues, mortgage fee income, insurance services revenues primarily due to the acquisition of two insurance agencies and financial management income primarily due to the acquisition of a third party benefits administrator. The increases were partially offset by increased noninterest expense due to higher incentive compensation based on the increases in noninterest income.

     Other reported a net loss of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to net loss of $3.3 million for the same year ago period. The decrease in the net loss was primarily due to a $5.8 million net loss on equity method investments for the year ended December 31, 2002 versus a net loss of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. In addition, gains on sale of equity securities amounted to $0.2 million and $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. These changes resulted in an income tax benefit of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2003 compared to an income tax benefit of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002.

25

Balance Sheet Analysis

Securities Available for Sale

     The securities portfolio, all of which is classified as available for sale, is a component of the Corporation’s asset-liability management strategy. The decision to purchase or sell securities is based upon liquidity needs, changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, and other factors. Securities available for sale are accounted for at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses recorded net of tax as a component of other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.

     The fair value of the securities portfolio is determined by a third party. The valuation is determined as of a date within close proximity to the end of the reporting period based on available quoted market prices or quoted market prices for similar securities if a quoted market price is not available.

     At December 31, 2003, securities available for sale were $1.60 billion or 38.1 percent of total assets, compared to $1.13 billion, or 30.1 percent of total assets, at December 31, 2002. The increase in securities available for sale was primarily due to the securitization of $286.9 million of mortgage loans held for sale during 2003, as well as the net purchase of $185.8 million of securities used to increase earning assets. The Corporation increased its securities available for sale portfolio early in the first quarter of 2003 to offset the effects of weak loan demand. During 2003, the Corporation changed the mix of the portfolio to stabilize cash flows by selling mortgage-backed securities which had produced a lower effective yield due to increased amortization of premiums, and reinvesting the proceeds in fixed-term agency securities and mortgage-backed securities of a shorter average life and at a lower coupon.

     The carrying value of securities available for sale was approximately $10.1 million above their amortized cost at December 31, 2003 and $26.1 million above their amortized cost at December 31, 2002. The weighted average life of the portfolio was 3.66 years at December 31, 2003 compared to 3.01 years at December 31, 2002.

     The following table shows, as of December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, the carrying value of (i) U.S. government obligations, (ii) U.S. government agency obligations, (iii) mortgage-backed securities, (iv) state and municipal obligations, and (v) equity securities.

Table Eight
Investment Portfolio

Loans Held for Sale

     Loans held for sale consist primarily of 15 and 30 year residential mortgage loans which the Corporation intends to sell as whole loans. Loans held for sale decreased to $5.1 million at December 31, 2003 as compared to $158.4 million at December 31, 2002. The decrease was due to the securitization and sale of mortgage loans during the year.

26

Loan Portfolio

     The Corporation’s loan portfolio at December 31, 2003 consisted of six major categories: Commercial Non Real Estate, Commercial Real Estate, Construction, Mortgage, Consumer, and Home Equity. Within these six segments the Corporation targets customers in our geographic area, works within most business segments and focuses on a relationship based business model. Pricing is driven by quality, loan size, the Corporation’s relationship with the customer and by competition. The Corporation is primarily a secured lender in all these loan categories. The Corporation’s loans are generally five years or less in duration with the exception of home equity lines and residential mortgages, for which the terms range from 15 to 30 years. In addition, The Corporation has a program in which it buys and sells portions of loans, both participations and syndications, from key strategic partner financial institutions, with which the Corporation has established relationships. This portfolio includes commercial real estate, commercial non real estate and construction loans. This program enables the Corporation to diversify both its geographic and its total exposure risk.

Commercial Non Real Estate

     The Corporation’s commercial non real estate lending program is generally targeted to serve small-to-middle market businesses with sales of $50 million or less in the Corporation’s geographic area. Commercial lending includes commercial, financial, agricultural and industrial loans. Pricing on commercial non real estate loans, driven largely by the Corporation’s relationship with the customer and by competition, is usually tied to widely recognized market indexes, such as the prime rate, the London Interbank Offer Rate (LIBOR) or rates on US Treasury securities.

Commercial Real Estate

     Similar to commercial non real estate lending, the Corporation’s commercial real estate lending program is generally targeted to serve small-to-middle market business with sales of $50 million or less in the Corporation’s geographic area. The real estate loans are both owner occupied and project related. As with commercial non real estate loans, pricing on commercial real estate loans, driven largely by the Corporation’s relationship with the customer and by competition, is usually tied to widely recognized market indexes, such as the prime rate, LIBOR or rates on US Treasury securities.

Construction

     Real estate construction loans include both commercial and residential construction/permanent loans, which are intended to convert to permanent loans upon completion of the construction project. Loans for commercial construction are usually to in-market developers, builders, businesses, individuals or real estate investors for the construction of commercial structures primarily in the Corporation’s market area. From time to time, the Corporation purchases construction loans in other market areas through a correspondent relationship. Construction loans purchased are typically serviced by third parties. Loans are made for purposes including, but not limited to, the construction of industrial facilities, apartments, shopping centers, office buildings, homes and warehouses. The properties may be constructed for sale, lease or owner-occupancy.

Mortgage

     The Corporation originates 1-4 family residential mortgage loans throughout the Corporation’s footprint and in Reston, Virginia, which is a loan origination office. The Corporation offers a full line of products, including conventional, conforming, and jumbo fixed rate and adjustable rate mortgages which are originated and sold into the secondary market; however, from time to time a portion of this production is retained and are serviced by the Corporation.

Consumer

     The Corporation offers a wide variety of consumer loan products. Various types of secured and unsecured loans are marketed to qualifying existing customers and to other creditworthy candidates in the Corporation’s market area. Unsecured loans, including revolving credits (e.g. checking account overdraft protection and personal lines of credit) are provided and various installment loan products such as vehicle loans are offered. All consumer lending is centrally decisioned and documented.

27

Home Equity

     Home Equity loans and lines are secured by first and second deeds of trust on the borrower’s residential real estate. As with all consumer lending, home equity loans are centrally decisioned and documented to ensure the underwriting conforms to the corporate lending policy.

     Gross loans increased 9 percent to $2.25 billion at December 31, 2003 compared to $2.07 billion at December 31, 2002. The growth in loans was primarily due to a $142.4 million increase in construction loans, which includes approximately $76 million of 1-4 family construction loans purchased in the third and fourth quarters of 2003 through a correspondent relationship. In addition, home equity loans increased $75.3 million and mortgage loans (primarily adjustable rate loans) increased $43.7 million driven by refinancings and the low interest rate environment. These increases were partially offset by the June Loan Sale and the sale of the Corporation’s $11.7 million credit card portfolio.

     The table below summarizes loans in the classifications indicated as of December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000, and 1999.

Table Nine
Loan Portfolio Composition