Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

The Restaurant Company

(901) 766-6400

Indicate by þ whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ    No o

Indicate by þ whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No þ

Number of shares of common stock outstanding: 10,820.

1

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THE RESTAURANT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In Thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

2

Table of Contents

THE RESTAURANT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.

3

Table of Contents

THE RESTAURANT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Par and Share Amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.

4

Table of Contents

THE RESTAURANT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In Thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements.

5

Table of Contents

THE RESTAURANT COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)

Organization

The Restaurant Company (the “Company,” “Perkins,” or “TRC”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Restaurant Holding Corporation (“RHC”). TRC conducts business under the name “Perkins Restaurant and Bakery”. TRC is also the sole stockholder of TRC Realty LLC, The Restaurant Company of Minnesota and Perkins Finance Corp. RHC’s principal stockholders are Donald N. Smith (“Mr. Smith”), TRC’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and BancBoston Ventures, Inc. (“BBV”). Mr. Smith is also the Chairman of Friendly Ice Cream Corporation (“FICC”), which operates and franchises approximately 543 restaurants, located primarily in the northeastern United States.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of TRC have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and notes necessary for complete financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The results for the periods indicated are unaudited but reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the operating results. Results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of a full year of operations. The notes to the financial statements contained in the 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K should be read in conjunction with these statements.

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.

Accounting Reporting Period

The Company’s fiscal calendar year consists of thirteen four-week periods ending on the last Sunday in December. The first quarter each year will include four four-week periods. The first and second quarters ended on April 20 and July 13, respectively. The third and fourth quarters of 2003 will end on October 5 and December 28, respectively.

Contingencies

The Company is a party to various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Management does not believe it is likely that these proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

On June 9, 2000, the Company entered into an agreement to guarantee fifty percent of borrowings up to a total guarantee of $1,500,000 for use by a franchisee to remodel and upgrade existing restaurants. As of July 13, 2003, there was $3,000,000 in borrowings outstanding under this agreement of which the Company guaranteed $1,500,000. The franchisee intends to refinance the indebtedness, at which time, the Company’s obligation under the current agreement will terminate.

Asset Write-Down

During the second quarter of 2003, the Company determined that impairment existed with respect to one Company owned restaurant. This determination was made based on the Company’s projections that the future cash flows of this restaurant would not exceed the present carrying value of the assets. Accordingly, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $150,000 to adjust the assets of this restaurant to net realizable value.

6

Table of Contents

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

The increase or decrease in cash and cash equivalents due to changes in operating assets and liabilities for the quarters and year-to-date periods ended July 13 and July 14, consists of the following (in thousands):

Other supplemental cash flow information is as follows (in thousands):

7

Table of Contents

Segment Reporting

The following presents revenue and other financial information by business segment for the quarters and year-to-date periods ended July 13 and July 14 (in thousands):

8

Table of Contents

A reconciliation of other segment loss is as follows (in thousands):

Revolving Credit Agreement

As of July 13, 2003, the Company has a secured $25,000,000 revolving line of credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a sub-limit for up to $5,000,000 of letters of credit. All amounts under the Credit Facility bear interest at floating rates based on the agent’s base rate or Eurodollar rates as defined in the agreement. All indebtedness under the Credit Facility is collateralized by a first priority lien on substantially all of the assets of the Company. As of July 13, 2003, there were $3,750,000 in borrowings and approximately $3,596,000 of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility.

At April 20, 2003, the Company failed to meet the criteria of one of the financial covenants of the Credit Facility. On May 14, 2003, the Company executed an amendment to the Credit Facility that waives the April 20, 2003 covenant violation, reduces the requirements of the financial covenants and lowers the total amount available under the Credit Facility from $40,000,000 to $25,000,000. At July 13, 2003, the Company was in compliance with the requirements of the financial covenants. However, based on current trends, the Company believes that it is likely that the Company will not comply with one or more covenants at the end of the first quarter of 2004. The Company has begun discussions with the credit facility lender to negotiate modified covenants that will ensure future compliance. If the Company is unable to modify the terms of this agreement and are unable to obtain waivers from the lender for possible future violations of these covenants, the lender could demand payment of the balance of the Credit Facility, which could constitute a default under the Notes and Discount Notes. If the Credit Facility lender, or the trustee or the holders of the Notes and the Discount Notes demanded repayment, the Company would seek to refinance the balance of the Credit Facility, the Notes and the Discount Notes with another lender. There can be no assurance that we will successfully modify the terms of the covenants or refinance the balance under the Credit Facility, the Notes and the Discount Notes.

9

Table of Contents

New Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”), an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to improve financial reporting of special purpose and other entities. In accordance with the interpretation, business enterprises that represent the primary beneficiary of another entity by retaining a controlling financial interest in that entity’s assets, liabilities, and results of operating activities must consolidate the entity in their financial statements. Prior to the issuance of FIN 46, consolidation generally occurred when an enterprise controlled another entity through voting interests. Certain VIEs that are qualifying special purpose entities (“QSPEs”) subject to the reporting requirements of SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities, will not be required to be consolidated under the provisions of FIN 46. The consolidation provisions of FIN 46 apply to VIEs created or entered into after January 31, 2003, and for pre-existing VIEs in the first reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. If applicable, transition rules allow the restatement of financial statements or prospective application with a cumulative effect adjustment. In addition, FIN 46 expands the disclosure requirements for the beneficiary of a significant or a majority of the variable interests to provide information regarding the nature, purpose and financial characteristics of the entities. The Company does not believe that the adoption of FIN 46 will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF Issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor, which states that cash consideration received from a vendor is presumed to be a reduction of the prices of the vendor’s products or services and should, therefore, be characterized as a reduction of cost of sales when recognized in the statement of operations. That presumption is overcome when the consideration is either a reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs incurred to sell the vendor’s products, or a payment for assets or services delivered to the vendor. EITF Issue No. 02-16 is effective for arrangements entered into after November 21, 2002. The Company is already accounting for vendor rebates in a manner consistent with the EITF consensus. Therefore, applying the provisions of EITF Issue No. 02-16 will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This Statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this Statement will have a material effect on the results of operations or financial position of the Company.

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. This Statement requires an issuer to classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not believe that adoption of the Statement will have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

10

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.   MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SECOND QUARTER ENDED JULY 13, 2003

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview:

The Company is a leading operator and franchisor of mid-scale restaurants located in 35 states and four Canadian provinces. As of July 13, 2003, the Company owned and operated 155 and franchised 343 Perkins Restaurants. Both the Company-operated and franchised Perkins Restaurants operate under the names “Perkins Restaurant and Bakery,” “Perkins Family Restaurant,” “Perkins Family Restaurant and Bakery,” or “Perkins Restaurant” and the mark “Perkins”. The Company also offers cookie doughs, muffin batters, pancake mixes, pies and other food products for sale to our Company-operated and franchised restaurants and bakery and food service distributors through Foxtail Foods (“Foxtail”), our manufacturing division. The business of Perkins was founded in 1958, and since then Perkins has continued to adapt its menus, product offerings, building designs and decor to meet changing consumer preferences. Perkins is a highly recognized brand in the geographic areas it serves.

The Company’s revenues are derived primarily from the operation of Company-owned restaurants, the sale of bakery products produced by Foxtail and franchise royalties. In order to ensure consistency and availability of Perkins’ proprietary products to each unit in the system, Foxtail offers cookie doughs, muffin batters, pancake mixes, pies and other food products to Company-operated and franchised restaurants through food service distributors. Sales to Company-operated restaurants are eliminated in the accompanying statements of operations. For the quarter ended July 13, 2003, revenues from Company-operated restaurants, Foxtail, and franchise and other accounted for 82.9%, 10.2% and 6.9% of total revenue, respectively.

11

Table of Contents

A summary of the Company’s results for the quarters and year-to-date periods ended July 13, 2003 and July 14, 2002 are presented in the following table. All revenues, costs and expenses are expressed as a percentage of total revenues.

Net Income for the second quarter of 2003 was $1,438,000 versus net income of $850,000 for the second quarter of 2002. For the year-to-date period ended July 13, 2003, net income was $1,381,000 compared to $1,479,000 for the year-to-date period ended July 14, 2002.

12

Table of Contents

Revenues:

Total revenues for the second quarter of 2003 decreased 0.6% from the prior year second quarter. Year-to-date total revenues decreased 3.0% over the prior year-to-date period. This decrease is primarily due to lower comparable restaurant sales.

Same store comparable sales in Company-operated restaurants decreased approximately 2.9% for the second quarter and 4.9% year-to-date due to a decline in comparable guest visits of 6.4% and 8.1%, respectively. A difficult economic environment and competitor intrusion contributed to the decrease in comparable guest visits. The decrease in comparable guest visits was partially offset by an increase in the guest check average due to cumulative price increases and the introduction of a new menu with a focus on higher priced lunch and dinner items.

Revenues from Foxtail increased approximately 7.4% over the prior year quarter and 1.9% over the prior year-to-date period and constituted approximately 10.2% and 9.5%, respectively, of the Company’s total revenues. The increase is primarily due to an increase in sales to customers outside of the Perkins system.

Franchise revenue, composed mainly of franchise royalties, decreased 1.9% over the second quarter of 2002 and decreased 3.8% year-to-date. Royalty revenues declined slightly due to a decrease in both average franchise stores in operation and comparable sales. Since the second quarter of 2002, the Company’s franchisees have opened 11 restaurants and have closed 16 restaurants.

Costs and Expenses:

Food cost:

In terms of total revenues, food cost increased 1.4 percentage points over the second quarter of 2002 and increased 0.7 percentage points over the previous year-to-date period. For the second quarter and year-to-date periods, restaurant food cost, as a percentage of restaurant sales, increased 1.1 and 0.7 percentage points, respectively, over 2002 primarily due to increased commodity costs and the introduction of a new menu which resulted in a menu mix shift to higher food cost lunch and dinner items. These increases were partially offset by the impact of selective menu price increases. As a percentage of Foxtail sales, Foxtail food cost increased 3.7 and 1.7 percentage points for the quarter and year-to-date period, respectively.

Labor and benefits:

Labor and benefits expense, as a percentage of total revenues, decreased 0.3 percentage points over the second quarter of 2002 and increased 0.1% for the year-to-date period ended July 13, 2003. The decrease for the quarter is primarily due to management’s emphasis on controlling costs. The year-to-date increase is primarily due to a decrease in productivity in Company-operated restaurants and an increase in workers’ compensation and employee insurance costs.

Federal and state minimum wage laws impact the wage rates of the Company’s hourly employees. Certain states do not allow tip credits for servers which results in higher payroll costs as well as greater exposure to increases in minimum wage rates. In the past, the Company has been able to offset increases in labor costs through selective menu price increases and improvements in labor productivity. However, there is no assurance that future increases can be mitigated through raising menu prices.

Operating expenses:

Expressed as a percentage of total revenues, operating expenses were flat for the second quarter and increased 0.5 percentage points for the year-to-date period. The increase is primarily due to the impact of rising natural gas costs.

13

Table of Contents

General and administrative:

General and administrative expenses, as a percentage of total revenues, decreased 0.5 and 0.1 percentage points over the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2002, respectively. The decrease is primarily due to decreased incentive costs and the cumulative effect of selected workforce reductions since the beginning of 2002.

Depreciation and amortization:

Depreciation and amortization expense decreased from 6.4 percent of sales to 5.4 percent of sales over the second quarter 2002 primarily due to the Company’s reduction in capital spending since 2001.

Interest, net:

Interest expense, as a percentage of total revenue, decreased 0.4 and 0.2 percentage points over the second quarter and year-to-date periods of 2002, respectively, primarily due to a reduction in the overall borrowings by the Company.

Other, net:

Other income decreased slightly compared to the second quarter of 2002.

CAPITAL RESOURCES AND LIQUIDITY

The Company’s primary sources of funding during the quarter were cash flows from operating activities and borrowings under the Company’s revolving line of credit facility. The principal uses of cash during the quarter were payments on long-term debt and capital expenditures. Capital expenditures consisted primarily of capital required to maintain operations and costs related to remodeling and upgrading existing restaurants.

The following table summarizes capital expenditures for the year-to-date periods ended July 13, 2003 and July 14, 2002 (in thousands):

The Company’s capital budget for 2003 is $12.6 million and includes plans to open no new Company-operated restaurants. Actual capital expenditures have been primarily applied to remodeling of existing restaurants and restaurant maintenance. The primary source of funding for these projects was cash flows from operating activities.

The Company ordinarily operates with a working capital deficit since funds generated by cash sales in excess of those needed to service current liabilities are used by the Company to reduce debt and acquire capital assets. At July 13, 2003, this working capital deficit was $9,355,000.

14

Table of Contents

As of July 13, 2003, the Company has a secured $25,000,000 revolving line of credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with a sub-limit for up to $5,000,000 of letters of credit. All amounts under the Credit Facility bear interest at floating rates based on the agent’s base rate or Eurodollar rates as defined in the agreement. All indebtedness under the Credit Facility is collateralized by a first priority lien on substantially all of the assets of the Company. As of July 13, 2003, there were $3,750,000 in borrowings and approximately $3,596,000 of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility.

At April 20, 2003, the Company failed to meet the criteria of one of the financial covenants of the Credit Facility. On May 14, 2003, the Company executed an amendment to the Credit Facility that waives the April 20, 2003 covenant violation, reduces the requirements of the financial covenants and lowers the total amount available under the Credit Facility from $40,000,000 to $25,000,000. At July 13, 2003, the Company was in compliance with the requirements of the financial covenants. However, based on current trends, the Company believes that it is likely that the Company will not comply with one or more covenants at the end of the first quarter of 2004. The Company has begun discussions with the credit facility lender to negotiate modified covenants that will ensure future compliance. If the Company is unable to modify the terms of this agreement and are unable to obtain waivers from the lender for possible future violations of these covenants, the lender could demand payment of the balance of the Credit Facility, which could constitute a default under the Notes and Discount Notes. If the Credit Facility lender, or the trustee or the holders of the Notes and the Discount Notes demanded repayment, the Company would seek to refinance the balance of the Credit Facility, the Notes and the Discount Notes with another lender. There can be no assurance that we will successfully modify the terms of the covenants or refinance the balance under the Credit Facility, the Notes and the Discount Notes.

On November 15, 2001 the Company elected to begin accruing cash interest on its 11.25% Senior Discount Notes (the “Notes”). Cash interest will be payable semi-annually on May 15 and November 15. The principal balance of the Notes on July 13, 2003 was $18,009,000. On May 15, 2003 the Company paid $8,383,000 in principal of the Notes at a redemption price of 105.625% of the face amount of the notes.

The Company has contractual obligations and commercial commitments including long-term debt, land lease obligations for Company operated restaurants and office space for corporate operations. The table below presents, as of July 13, 2003, the Company’s future scheduled principal repayments of long-term debt and lease obligations (in thousands).

15

Table of Contents

TRC Realty LLC leases an aircraft for use by both FICC and TRC. The operating lease expires in November 2009. During the third quarter, TRC Realty anticipates terminating its lease for the corporate aircraft. In accordance with the terms of the lease, TRC Realty is required to pay a Termination Value to the lessor upon termination of the lease. As a result, TRC anticipates incurring a loss of approximately $950,000 on the termination of the lease. Concurrently, TRC Realty anticipates entering into a new lease for a smaller and less expensive aircraft, which will be used solely by TRC.

TRC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of RHC. The common shares of RHC not owned by Mr. Smith are subject to an option to require RHC to redeem the shares at any time after December 22, 2004 at fair market value (the “Put”). As of July 13, 2003, these shares represented 30% of the outstanding common stock of RHC. As of December 28, 2002, the estimated fair market value of the Put was $9,220,000. RHC has a management fee agreement dated as of December 22, 1999, with BBV whereby BBV provides certain consulting services to RHC. In consideration for these services, a fee of $250,000 accrues annually and is payable by RHC on December 22, 2004.

16

Table of Contents

Additionally, RHC issued 50,000 shares of non-voting preferred stock on December 22, 1999. The preferred stock is mandatorily redeemable for $1,000 per share (the “Liquidation Value”) plus all accrued but unpaid dividends, if any, on December 22, 2006. Preferred dividends of 8% per annum of the Liquidation Value of each share are payable quarterly. As of July 13, 2003, approximately $16,263,000 of in-kind dividends had been paid through the issuance of additional shares of preferred stock. Assuming a continuation of in-kind dividends, the redemption price on December 22, 2006 is estimated to be $87,044,000. The holders of preferred stock are entitled to be paid in cash the Liquidation Value of each share of preferred stock before any payments are made to any holders of common stock. The preferred stock is redeemable at the option of the Company at any time prior to the mandatory redemption date at the Liquidation Value.

RHC has no material assets other than its investment in TRC. The ability of TRC to pay dividends to or make distributions to RHC in order to redeem common or preferred shares or pay the management fee to BBV is restricted under its senior notes and the Credit Facility.

The Company’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal of, or to pay the interest or liquidated damages, if any, on, or to refinance, its indebtedness, or to fund planned capital expenditures, or to meet its or RHC’s other liquidity needs will depend on the Company’s future performance, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond control of the Company. Based upon the current level of operations, management believes that cash flow from operating activities and available cash, together with available borrowings under the Credit Facility, will be adequate to meet the Company’s liquidity needs in the normal course of its operations. There can be no assurance that the Company will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, have access to capital markets or that future borrowings will be available in an amount sufficient to enable the Company to service its indebtedness or to fund its other liquidity needs. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to effect any necessary recapitalization or refinancing on commercially reasonable terms or at all.

SEASONALITY

Company revenues are subject to seasonal fluctuations. Customer counts (and consequently revenues) are highest in the summer months and lowest during the winter months because of the high proportion of restaurants located in states where inclement weather adversely affects guest visits.

17

Table of Contents

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”), an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to improve financial reporting of special purpose and other entities. In accordance with the interpretation, business enterprises that represent the primary beneficiary of another entity by retaining a controlling financial interest in that entity’s assets, liabilities, and results of operating activities must consolidate the entity in their financial statements. Prior to the issuance of FIN 46, consolidation generally occurred when an enterprise controlled another entity through voting interests. Certain VIEs that are qualifying special purpose entities (“QSPEs”) subject to the reporting requirements of SFAS 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities, will not be required to be consolidated under the provisions of FIN 46. The consolidation provisions of FIN 46 apply to VIEs created or entered into after January 31, 2003, and for pre-existing VIEs in the first reporting period beginning after June 15, 2003. If applicable, transition rules allow the restatement of financial statements or prospective application with a cumulative effect adjustment. In addition, FIN 46 expands the disclosure requirements for the beneficiary of a significant or a majority of the variable interests to provide information regarding the nature, purpose and financial characteristics of the entities. The Company does not believe that the adoption of FIN 46 will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives) and for hedging activities under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This Statement is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this Statement will have a material effect on the results of operations or financial position of the Company.

In January 2003, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF Issue No. 02-16, Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor, which states that cash consideration received from a vendor is presumed to be a reduction of the prices of the vendor’s products or services and should, therefore, be characterized as a reduction of cost of sales when recognized in the statement of operations. That presumption is overcome when the consideration is either a reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs incurred to sell the vendor’s products, or a payment for assets or services delivered to the vendor. EITF Issue No. 02-16 is effective for arrangements entered into after November 21, 2002. The Company is already accounting for vendor rebates in a manner consistent with the EITF consensus. Therefore, applying the provisions of EITF Issue No. 02-16 will not have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. This Statement requires an issuer to classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability. This statement is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not believe that adoption of the Statement will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial statements.

18

Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This discussion contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations that are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, the following: general economic conditions, competitive factors, consumer taste and preferences and adverse weather conditions. The Company does not undertake to publicly update or revise the forward-looking statements even if experience or future changes make it clear that the projected results expressed or implied therein will not be realized.

19

Table of Contents

ITEM 4.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     We maintain disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Our principal executive and financial officers have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and have determined that such disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

     Subsequent to our evaluation, there were no significant changes in internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect internal controls, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

20

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Exhibits -

(b) Reports on Form 8-K – The Company did not file any reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended July 13, 2003.

21

Table of Contents

Signature

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.