JEFFERSON PILOT CORP - 10-Q Quarterly Report

FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For Quarter Ended June 30, 2003		Commission file number 1-5955

Jefferson-Pilot Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


North Carolina (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		56-0896180 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


100 North Greene Street, Greensboro, North Carolina (Address of principal executive offices)		27401 (Zip Code)

(336) 691-3000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [X] No [ ]

Number of shares of common stock outstanding at June 30, 2003 141,789,519

JEFFERSON-PILOT CORPORATION

INDEX


		- Page No. -

Part I.	Financial Information
Item 1.	Consolidated Unaudited Condensed Balance Sheets - June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002		3
	Consolidated Unaudited Condensed Statements of Income - Three and Six Months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002		4
	Consolidated Unaudited Condensed Statements of Cash Flows - Six Months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002		5
	Notes to Consolidated Unaudited Condensed Financial Statements		6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		12
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		42
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		42
Part II.	Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		43
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		43
Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K		43
Signatures			44
Exhibit Index, followed by Exhibits			45

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

JEFFERSON-PILOT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollar Amounts in Millions Except Share Information)


					June 30			December 31
					2003			2002

				ASSETS
Investments:
		Debt securities available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost $15,997 and $15,591)			$	17,259		$	16,465
		Debt securities held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value $3,155 and $3,225)				2,912			3,036
		Equity securities available for sale, at fair value (cost $295 and $46)				713			409
		Mortgage loans on real estate				3,267			3,294
		Policy loans				901			909
		Real estate				131			133
		Other investments				34			33

				Total investments		25,217			24,279
Cash and cash equivalents						52			67
Accrued investment income						310			302
Due from reinsurers						1,373			1,375
Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired						2,007			2,027
Goodwill						312			312
Assets held in separate accounts						1,916			1,785
Other assets						491			462

			Total assets		$	31,678		$	30,609

				LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Policy liabilities:
	Future policy benefits				$	2,638		$	2,592
	Policyholder contract deposits					20,001			19,545
	Dividend accumulations and other policyholder funds on deposit					247			248
	Policy and contract claims					161			161
	Other					636			586

			Total policy liabilities			23,683			23,132
Commercial paper and revolving credit borrowings						528			453
Securities sold under repurchase agreements						376			499
Currently payable income taxes						(25	)		46
Deferred income tax liabilities						534			385
Liabilities related to separate accounts						1,916			1,785
Accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities						495			469

			Total liabilities			27,507			26,769

Commitments and contingent liabilities
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest in subordinated debentures (“Capital Securities”)						300			300
Stockholders’ Equity:
		Common stock and paid in capital, par value $1.25 per share: authorized 350,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2003-141,789,519 shares; 2002-142,798,768 shares				177			180
		Retained earnings				2,864			2,750
		Accumulated other comprehensive income				830			610

						3,871			3,540

			Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	31,678		$	30,609

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

JEFFERSON-PILOT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Dollar Amounts in Millions Except Per Share Information)


		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
		June 30						June 30

		2003			2002			2003			2002

Revenue:
Premiums and other considerations		$	426		$	391		$	852		$	763
Net investment income			413			403			820			807
Realized investment gains			20			4			1			38
Communications sales			51			50			101			98
Other			24			30			48			57

	Total revenue		934			878			1,822			1,763

Benefits and Expenses:
Insurance and annuity benefits			524			495			1,045			981
Insurance commissions, net of deferrals			25			32			50			63
General and administrative expenses, net of deferrals			57			56			109			109
Amortization of policy acquistion costs and value of business acquired			81			69			163			132
Communications operations			27			28			62			62

	Total benefits and expenses		714			680			1,429			1,347

Income before income taxes			220			198			393			416
Income taxes			74			67			132			139

Net income before dividends on Capital Securities			146			131			261			277
Dividends on Capital Securities			(6	)		(6	)		(12	)		(12	)

Net income available to common stockholders		$	140		$	125		$	249		$	265

Net income available to common stockholders, before dividends on Capital Securities		$	146		$	131		$	261		$	277
Other comprehensive income			191			191			220			86

Comprehensive income		$	337		$	322		$	481		$	363

Average number of shares outstanding			142.0			149.4			142.4			149.7

Net Income Per Share of Common Stock:
Net income available to common stockholders		$	0.99		$	0.84		$	1.75		$	1.77

Net income available to common stockholders - assuming dilution		$	0.98		$	0.83		$	1.74		$	1.75

Dividends declared per common share		$	0.330		$	0.303		$	0.633		$	0.605

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

JEFFERSON-PILOT CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED CONDENSED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Millions)


	Six Months Ended
	June 30
	2003			2002

Net cash provided by operations	$	220		$	113

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Investments purchased, net		(476	)		(644	)
Other investing activities		1			(15	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(475	)		(659	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Policyholder contract deposits		1,183			1,352
Policyholder contract withdrawals		(748	)		(684	)
Net short-term repayments		(48	)		(19	)
Repurchase of common shares, net		(46	)		(112	)
Cash dividends paid		(102	)		(99	)
Other financing activities		1			4

Net cash provided by financing activities		240			442

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(15	)		(104	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		67			139

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	52		$	35

Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Income taxes paid	$	167		$	121

Interest paid	$	7		$	14

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

JEFFERSON-PILOT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED UNAUDITED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Dollar amounts in millions)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Operating results for the six-month period ended June 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2003. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

Stock Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock incentive awards in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and accordingly, recognizes no compensation expense for stock option awards to employees or directors when the option price is not less than the market value of the stock at the date of award. The Company recognizes expense utilizing the fair value method in accordance with SFAS 123 for stock options granted to non-employees, specifically agents.

SFAS 123 requires the presentation of pro forma information as if the Company had accounted for its employee and director stock options granted after December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of that Statement.

The following is a reconciliation of reported net income and pro forma information as if the Company had adopted SFAS 123 for its employee and director stock option awards:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30
	2003		2002		2003		2002

Net income, as reported	$	140	$	125	$	249	$	265
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects		—		2		3		7

Pro forma net income available to common stockholders	$	140	$	123	$	246	$	258

Earnings per share available to common stockholders, as reported	$	0.99	$	0.84	$	1.75	$	1.77
Pro forma earnings per share available to common stockholders	$	0.99	$	0.82	$	1.73	$	1.72
Earnings per share available to common stockholders – assuming dilution, as reported	$	0.98	$	0.83	$	1.74	$	1.75
Pro forma earnings per share available to common stockholders – assuming dilution	$	0.98	$	0.81	$	1.72	$	1.70

All Significant Accounting Policies remain as we described in our Form 10-K for 2002.

3. Segment Reporting

The Company has five reportable segments that are defined based on the nature of the products and services offered: Individual Products, Annuity and Investment Products (AIP), Benefit Partners, Communications, and Corporate and Other. The segments remain as we described in our Form 10-K for 2002.

The following table summarizes certain financial information regarding the Company’s reportable segments:


			June 30		December 31
			2003		2002

Assets
	Individual Products		$	17,124	$	16,671
	AIP			9,487		9,397
	Benefit Partners			980		909
	Communications			201		204
	Corporate & other			3,886		3,428

		Total assets	$	31,678	$	30,609


			Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
			June 30				June 30
			2003		2002		2003		2002

Revenues
	Individual Products		$	457	$	451	$	923	$	898
	AIP			173		171		343		341
	Benefit Partners			208		177		405		340
	Communications			50		49		100		97
	Corporate & Other			26		26		50		49

				914		874		1,821		1,725
	Realized investment gains, before tax			20		4		1		38

		Total revenues	$	934	$	878	$	1,822	$	1,763

Reportable segments results and reconciliation to net income available to common stockholders
	Individual Products		$	74	$	75	$	150	$	145
	AIP			22		20		43		41
	Benefit Partners			12		12		24		25
	Communications			12		10		19		17
	Corporate & Other			7		5		12		12

		Total reportable segment results		127		122		248		240
	Realized investment gains, net of tax			13		3		1		25

		Net income available to common stockholders	$	140	$	125	$	249	$	265

4. Income from Continuing Operations Per Share of Common Stock

The following table sets forth the computation of earnings per share and earnings per share assuming dilution:


			Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
			June 30						June 30
			2003			2002			2003			2002

Numerator:
	Net income before dividends on Capital Securities		$	146		$	131		$	261		$	277
	Dividends on Capital Securities			(6	)		(6	)		(12	)		(12	)

	Numerator for earnings per share and earnings per share - assuming dilution – Net income available to common stockholders		$	140		$	125		$	249		$	265

Denominator:
	Denominator for earnings per share – weighted-average shares outstanding			142,038,270			149,370,907			142,419,088			149,733,120
	Effect of dilutive securities:
		Stock options		1,017,098			1,662,955			937,649			1,684,168

	Denominator for earnings per share assuming dilution – adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding			143,055,368			151,033,862			143,356,737			151,417,288

Earnings per share			$	0.99		$	0.84		$	1.75		$	1.77

Earnings per share – assuming dilution			$	0.98		$	0.83		$	1.74		$	1.75

5. Contingent Liabilities

A life insurance subsidiary has been a defendant in two separate proposed class action suits. The plaintiffs’ fundamental claim in the first suit is that policy illustrations were misleading to consumers. A settlement of this case was approved by the court on June 17, 2003. In agreeing to settle, the life company has denied any wrongdoing but believes that the settlement provides benefits to the policyholder class and to the life company by resolving and eliminating the need for corporate resources to be spent on a lawsuit that has been pending for seven years.

The second proposed class action suit alleges that a predecessor company, decades ago, unfairly discriminated in the sale of certain small face amount life insurance policies, and unreasonably priced these policies. Management believes that the life company’s practices have complied with state insurance laws and intends to vigorously defend the claims asserted.

In the normal course of business, the Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various lawsuits, including several proposed class action suits in addition to those noted above. Because of the considerable uncertainties that exist, the Company cannot predict the outcome of pending or future litigation. However, management believes that the resolution of pending legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or liquidity, although it could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations for a specified period.

6. Accounting Pronouncements

In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (Interpretation No. 45). The disclosure requirements of Interpretation No. 45 are effective for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. Adoption of Interpretation No. 45 had no impact on the Company’s financial statement disclosure for 2002. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002 and did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51 (the Interpretation). The Interpretation requires the consolidation of entities in which an enterprise absorbs a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both, as a result of ownership, contractual or other financial interests in the entity. Currently, entities are generally consolidated by an enterprise when it has a controlling financial interest through ownership of a majority voting interest in the entity.

One of the Company’s subsidiaries has sold certain of its loans receivables to an unrelated third-party bank sponsored conduit under a securitization facility. Under the securitization facility, the Company has an agreement to sell, on an initial and periodic basis, pools of certain loans receivable to a special-purpose entity (SPE). The SPE then sells a senior interest in the receivables at a discount to the conduit in exchange for cash, which is used to purchase additional receivables from the Company. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with the conduit is limited to the carrying value of the retained subordinate interest of approximately $12 at June 30, 2003.

The transfer of the loans receivable are recognized as sales in accordance with SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. Gains and losses from transfers are recognized in the income statement when the Company relinquishes control of the transferred financial assets. The gain or loss recognized on a sale depends in part on the previous carrying amount of the assets involved in the transfer, allocated between the portion of the assets sold and the retained interests based upon their respective fair values at the date of sale. Therefore, the application of the Interpretation will not have an effect on the Company’s consolidation policy.

Additionally, the Company is in the process of evaluating the implications of the Interpretation to a few small selected interests in partnerships and investment companies. Presently, it is not anticipated that the application will have any impact on our consolidation practices.

In April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 149), which is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, with certain exceptions. The adoption of SFAS 149 is not expected to impact the Company’s financial position or results of operation.

In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity” (the Statement). The Statement requires the classification of certain financial instruments as either a liability or equity, depending on the characteristics of the instrument. Currently, the Company has its Capital Securities classified as “Mezzanine Capital” in that they are grouped neither as a liability or equity. The application of the Statement would require the Capital Securities to be classified as a liability. Additionally, payments to Capital Security holders that are currently classified as dividends will be required to be included as interest expense on a prospective basis. This statement will be effective as of July 1, 2003. Prior reported amounts of dividends will not be restated. There will be no cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle upon adoption, only reclassification on both the balance sheet and income statement on a prospective basis.


Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations analyzes the consolidated financial condition, changes in financial position and results of operations for the three month and six month periods ended June 30, 2003, as compared to the same periods of 2002, of Jefferson-Pilot Corporation and subsidiaries. The discussion supplements Management’s Discussion and Analysis in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, and should be read in conjunction with the interim financial statements and notes contained herein. All dollar amounts are in millions except share and per share amounts.

Company Profile

As detailed in our Form 10-K, we have five reportable segments: Individual Products, Annuity and Investment Product (AIP), Benefit Partners, Communications, and Corporate and Other.

Our reportable segments’ revenues as a percentage of total revenues, excluding realized gains and losses, were as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30

	2003			2002			2003			2002

Individual Products		50	%		52	%		51	%		52	%
AIP		19	%		20	%		19	%		20	%
Benefit Partners		23	%		20	%		22	%		20	%
Communications		5	%		5	%		5	%		5	%
Corporate and Other		3	%		3	%		3	%		3	%

Update on Critical Accounting Policies

Our Form 10-K described our accounting policies that are critical to the understanding of our results of operations and our financial position. They relate to deferred acquisition costs (DAC) and value of business acquired (VOBA), assumptions and judgments utilized in determining if declines in fair values of investments are other than temporary, valuation methods for infrequently traded securities and private placements, and accruals relating to legal and administrative proceedings.

We believe that these policies continued to be applied in a consistent manner during the first six months of 2003. Legal proceedings are discussed in Note 5 to the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

Results of Operations

In the following discussion, “reportable segment results” and “total reportable segment results” include all elements of net income available to common stockholders except realized investment gains and losses. We use reportable segment results in assessing the performance of our business segments internally and believe that it is relevant and useful information. Reportable segment results as described above may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies. The following tables illustrate our results before and after including realized investment gains and losses and reconcile reportable segment results to net income available to common stockholders, the most directly comparable Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) financial measure:


		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30				June 30

		2003		2002		2003		2002

Consolidated Summary of Income
Total reportable segment results		$	126.9	$	122.4	$	248.4	$	240.1
Realized investment gains (net of applicable income taxes)			13.2		2.8		0.8		24.7

Net income available to common stockholders		$	140.1	$	125.2	$	249.2	$	264.8

Consolidated Earnings Per Share
Basic:
	Total reportable segment results	$	0.90	$	0.82	$	1.74	$	1.60
	Realized investment gains (net of applicable income taxes)		0.09		0.02		0.01		0.17

	Net income available to common stockholders	$	0.99	$	0.84	$	1.75	$	1.77

Fully-diluted:
	Total reportable segment results	$	0.89	$	0.81	$	1.73	$	1.59
	Realized investment gains (net of applicable income taxes)		0.09		0.02		0.01		0.16

	Net income available to common stockholders	$	0.98	$	0.83	$	1.74	$	1.75


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30

	2003		2002		2003		2002

Average number of shares outstanding		142,038,270		149,370,907		142,419,088		149,733,120

Average number of shares outstanding - - assuming dilution		143,055,368		151,033,862		143,356,737		151,417,288

Compared to second quarter 2002, net income available to common stockholders increased 11.9%, and for the first six months decreased 5.9% from 2002, primarily due to fluctuations in realized investment gains (which include other-than-temporary bond impairments in all of these periods).

We make decisions to realize investment gains based upon economic and market conditions. This quarter we chose to take advantage of the recent increase in the equity markets and market value recoveries on several debt securities that we had previously written down as other-than-temporarily impaired. Total reportable segment results increased 3.7% and 3.5% over the second quarter and first six months of 2002 due to higher AIP segment results, growth in our Communications segment and, in the second quarter, higher Corporate and Other segment results. Our Individual Products segment results were essentially flat for the second quarter and increased 4.0% over the first six months of 2002 as further discussed below. Our Benefit Partners segment results were also flat for the second quarter and decreased 3.9% from the first six months of 2002 due to adverse mortality in the group life business.

Increases in earnings per share amounts were more favorable than the increases in total earnings amounts due to continued share repurchases. Average diluted shares outstanding declined 5.3% from the second quarter and first six months of 2002.

Results by Business Segment

We assess profitability by business segment and measure other operating statistics as detailed in the separate segment discussions that follow. We determine reportable segments in a manner consistent with the way we organize for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing performance. Sales performance is a statistic we use to assess results. Our sales, which are primarily of long-duration contracts in the Individual Products and AIP segments, have less proportional immediate impact on results for these two segments as described in the segment discussions below.

Reportable Segment Results


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30

	2003		2002		2003		2002

Individual Products	$	74.3	$	74.8	$	150.3	$	144.5
AIP		21.6		19.3		42.8		40.7
Benefit Partners		12.5		12.5		24.4		25.4
Communications		11.5		10.6		18.6		17.1
Corporate and Other		7.0		5.2		12.3		12.4

Total reportable segment results		126.9		122.4		248.4		240.1
Net realized investment gains		13.2		2.8		0.8		24.7

Net income available to common stockholders	$	140.1	$	125.2	$	249.2	$	264.8

Segment Assets

We assign invested assets backing insurance liabilities to our segments in relation to policyholder funds and reserves. We assign net DAC and VOBA, reinsurance receivables and communications assets to the respective segments where those assets originate. We also assign invested assets to back capital allocated to each segment in relation to our philosophy for managing business risks. We assign the remainder of invested and other assets, including all defaulted securities, to the Corporate and Other segment.


		June 30

		2003		2002

Individual Products		$	17,124	$	16,319
AIP			9,487		9,022
Benefit Partners			980		852
Communications			201		197
Corporate and Other			3,886		3,268

	Total assets	$	31,678	$	29,658

Individual Products

The Individual Products segment markets individual life insurance policies through independent general agents, independent national account marketing firms, agency building general agents, home service agents, broker/dealers, banks and other strategic alliances.

Individual Products include universal life (UL) and variable universal life (VUL), together referred to as UL-type products, as well as traditional life products. The operating cycle for life insurance products is long term in nature; therefore, actuarial assumptions and the judgments used in those assumptions are important to the financial reporting for these products.

Traditional products require the policyholder to pay scheduled premiums over the life of the coverage. We recognize traditional premium receipts as revenues, and profits are expected to emerge in relation thereto.

UL-type product premiums may vary over the life of the policy at the discretion of the policyholder, so we do not recognize them as revenues when received, although UL-type premiums do increase assets and liabilities. We recognize revenues on these products from mortality, expense and surrender charges to policyholder fund balances (product charges). Additionally, we earn interest spreads on all UL-type and traditional products. Policy benefits include interest credited to policyholder fund balances as well as claim related costs.

Reportable segment results also include earnings on allocated capital for both traditional and UL-type products.

Segment results were:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30

	2003		2002		2003		2002

Traditional premiums and other considerations	$	42.0	$	45.6	$	86.2	$	92.8
UL and investment product charges		185.0		174.4		378.2		342.6
Net investment income		229.1		229.3		456.1		459.2
Other income		1.5		1.8		2.9		3.6

Total revenues		457.6		451.1		923.4		898.2

Policy benefits		266.5		264.9		540.8		536.2
Expenses		76.8		71.1		151.4		139.7

Total benefits and expenses		343.3		336.0		692.2		675.9

Reportable segment results before income taxes		114.3		115.1		231.2		222.3
Provision for income taxes		40.0		40.3		80.9		77.8

Reportable segment results	$	74.3	$	74.8	$	150.3	$	144.5

Individual Products reportable segment results decreased 0.7% from second quarter 2002 and increased 4.0% over the first six months of 2002 reflecting improved profitability on our UL-type products, offset by lower earnings on our older traditional products as well as increased amortization of VUL DAC as further discussed below.

The following table summarizes key data for Individual Products that we believe are our important drivers and indicators of future profitability:


		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
		June 30				June 30

		2003		2002		2003		2002

Annualized life insurance premium sales:
	Individual markets excluding Community Banks and BOLI	$	49	$	52	$	106	$	91
	Community Banks and BOLI	$	—	$	19	$	5	$	42

Average UL policyholder fund balances		$	10,508	$	9,779	$	10,430	$	9,645
Average VUL separate account assets			1,166		1,290		1,136		1,311

		$	11,674	$	11,069	$	11,566	$	10,956

Average face amount of insurance in force:
	Total	$	164,139	$	160,749	$	163,950	$	160,129
	UL-type policies	$	122,716	$	119,174	$	122,479	$	118,684

Average assets		$	16,977	$	16,301	$	16,864	$	16,260

Sales from our Individual markets excluding Community Banks and bank owned life insurance (BOLI) declined 5.8% from second quarter 2002, primarily due to training and market repositioning related to the introduction of a new fixed UL product. For the first six months, however, these sales increased 16.5% due to continued demand for several UL products introduced in 2002 and our continued Premier Partnering initiatives. We had no sales to Community Banks or of BOLI business for the quarter, and we experienced an 88.1% decrease in these sales from the first half of 2002. Community Bank and BOLI sales will vary widely between periods as we respond to sales

opportunities for these single premium products only when the market accommodates our required returns. This has not occurred in recent quarters.

Revenues include traditional insurance premiums and policy charges, net of reinsurance, and net investment income. Individual traditional premiums decreased 7.9% and 7.1% from the second quarter and first half of 2002 due to the continued decline in our traditional business in force as we are focusing our efforts towards UL-type products. UL and investment product charges increased 6.1% and 10.4% from the second quarter and first half of 2002. For the quarter, growth in UL product charges was in line with the growth of average UL policyholder fund balances of 7.5%. For the first six months, UL product charges grew faster than the average UL fund balances due to sales of certain products designed with higher up-front expense charges in the first year. Approximately 30% of the up-front expense charges, representing the levelized portion of these up-front expense charges, are taken into income immediately with the remaining 70% deferred through a charge to unearned revenue reserves, which are accounted for as policy benefits. The deferred expense charges on these products are taken into income over time in a manner consistent with DAC amortization.

Net investment income was flat when compared to both the second quarter and first six months of 2002, reflecting a decline in investment yields despite growth in business. Investment income earned on our traditional block of business decreased $3.2 and $6.6 from the second quarter and first half of 2002 due to this decline in our portfolio yields. Also negatively impacting net investment income was an increase in default charges from the Individual Products segment to the Corporate and Other segment of $1.4 over the second quarter and $2.6 over the first half of 2002, as further discussed below under Corporate and Other. During second quarter 2003, we continued to experience prepayments of mortgage-backed securities held by this segment. Our mortgage backed securities portfolio is primarily a discount portfolio; therefore, the effect of these prepayments was to accelerate the accretion of discount and increase the effective yields on our mortgage backed portfolio. For the second quarter and first six months of 2003, the excess accretion of discount as a result of these prepayments in this segment was $4.7 and $8.1 compared to $2.3 and $7.3 for the same periods of 2002. We continue to invest the proceeds from these prepayments at current market yields, which are lower than our portfolio yields.

In response to a decline in portfolio yields, we have actively managed our interest spreads (calculated as the difference between portfolio yields earned on invested assets less interest credited to policyholder funds, included in policy benefits) on our fixed UL-type products through crediting rate reductions. The average investment spread on fixed UL products increased 13 basis points to 2.01% and 6 basis points to 1.97% from the second quarter and first six months of 2002, and the average crediting rate decreased 58 basis points to 5.04% and 51 basis points to 5.09% from the these same periods. After these reductions our crediting rates are approximately 70 basis points on average in excess of our minimum guaranteed rates at June 30, 2003. Continued declines in general market interest rates may impact future profitability to the extent that these declines cannot be recovered through policy crediting rate reductions, and interest spreads may vary over time due to our competitive strategies and changes in product design.

Total policy benefits were flat compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2002. Policy benefits on traditional business include death benefits, dividends, surrenders and changes in reserves, with the most significant being death benefits. Total policy benefits on traditional contracts represented 126.6% and 125.4% of premiums in the second quarter and the first six months of 2003 compared to 118.7% and 127.7% in the second quarter and the first six months of 2002. The increase over second quarter 2002 is driven by the fact that our premium income on this

block of business is declining at a faster rate than the benefits. The improvement over the first six months of 2002 primarily reflects lower surrender activity.

Policy benefits on UL-type products include interest credited to policyholder accounts, death benefits in excess of fund balances and changes in unearned revenue reserves. Total policy benefits on UL-type products, on an annualized basis, decreased to 7.4% and 7.5% of average policyholder funds and separate accounts versus 7.6% and 7.7% from the second quarter and first six months of 2002. Interest credited declined $4.1 and $7.1 or 3.1% and 2.7% from the second quarter and first half of 2002, despite an increase in average UL fund balances of 7.5% and 8.1%, reflecting the crediting rate reductions described above. The change in deferred revenue reserves increased $1.6 and $9.2 over the second quarter and first six months of 2002 due to increased sales of products with higher up-front expense charges. Death benefits on UL-type products for the second quarter increased over 2002 partially due to the growth of business and due to an increase in the average age of our insureds. Actual mortality experience, net of reinsurance, for UL-type products per thousand dollars of face amount of insurance in force was $2.19 and $2.25 for the second quarter and first six months of 2003 compared to $2.04 and $2.10 for the 2002 periods. Mortality policy charges per thousand dollars of face amount of insurance in force were $4.02 and $4.06 for the second quarter and first six months of 2003 compared to $4.00 and $3.97 for the 2002 periods, again reflecting the increase in average age of our insureds. Recent products are designed to rely more on expense charges rather than mortality charges.

Total expenses (including the net deferral and amortization of DAC and VOBA) increased 8.0% and 8.4% from the second quarter and first six months of 2002. The expense details are as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30

	2003			2002			2003			2002

Commissions	$	66.4		$	67.4		$	145.6		$	130.5
General and administrative – acquisition related		22.1			20.7			45.2			41.9
General and administrative – maintenance related		10.6			11.7			17.6			20.9
Taxes, licenses and fees		12.5			13.9			27.4			28.6

Total commissions and expenses incurred		111.6			113.7			235.8			221.9
Less commissions and expenses capitalized		(79.5	)		(81.2	)		(174.7	)		(156.4	)
Amortization of DAC and VOBA		44.7			38.6			90.3			74.2

Total expense	$	76.8		$	71.1		$	151.4		$	139.7

The increase in expenses over the second quarter and first six months of 2002 reflects higher amortization of DAC and VOBA, partially offset by decreases in taxes, licenses and fees and maintenance expenses. Recent years’ sales growth combined with adjustments to the assumptions of our mean reversion techniques for VUL products that we made in the third quarter of 2002 are the primary contributors to the increase in the amortization of DAC and VOBA. Amortization of DAC and VOBA on VUL products increased $3.2 and $6.8 over the second quarter and first half of 2002. The expense amounts we capitalize as DAC include first year commissions, as well as deferrable acquisition expenses. We generally limit our capitalization of deferrable acquisition

expenses to the lower of product specific pricing allowables or our actual deferrable acquisition costs. As second quarter sales decreased, pricing allowables capped the amounts of acquisition expenses and commissions capitalized.

Average Individual Products assets grew 4.1% and 3.7% over the second quarter and first six months of 2002, primarily due to growth in existing UL policyholder fund balances, partially offset by declines in the market values of separate account assets of variable products. Average VUL separate account assets decreased 9.6% and 13.3% compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2002. Compared to the first six months of 2002, adjusting for the change in market value, net of dividends, average separate account balances increased 3.2%, and total average fund balances grew by 7.4%.

Our financial and operating risks for this segment include, among others, interest spread risks, mortality risks, variances between actual and underlying assumptions of DAC and VOBA, changes in taxation of our products and competing offerings and the effects of unresolved litigation. We discuss these risks in more detail in the Financial Position, Capital Resources and Liquidity, and Market Risk Exposures sections of our Form 10-K.

Annuity and Investment Products

Annuity and Investment Products are marketed through most distribution channels discussed in the Individual Products segment as well as through financial institutions, investment professionals and annuity marketing organizations. Jefferson Pilot Securities Corporation (with related entities, JPSC), a registered non-clearing broker/dealer, markets variable life insurance and variable annuities written by our insurance subsidiaries and other carriers, and also sells other securities and mutual funds.

Reportable segment results were:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30

	2003		2002		2003		2002

Policy charges, premiums and other considerations	$	2.5	$	3.0	$	4.5	$	6.6
Net investment income		147.4		140.9		292.9		281.5
Concession and other income		23.1		27.2		45.3		52.6

Total revenues		173.0		171.1		342.7		340.7

Policy benefits		103.7		103.1		207.3		203.5
Expenses		36.1		38.2		69.5		74.6

Total benefits and expenses		139.8		141.3		276.8		278.1

Reportable segment results before income taxes		33.2		29.8		65.9		62.6
Provision for income taxes		11.6		10.5		23.1		21.9

Reportable segment results	$	21.6	$	19.3	$	42.8	$	40.7

AIP reportable segment results increased by 11.9% and 5.2% compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2002 as detailed in the following discussion.

The following table summarizes key information for AIP:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30

	2003			2002			2003			2002

Fixed annuity premium sales	$	132		$	256		$	247		$	442
Variable annuity premium sales		1			2			2			7

	$	133		$	258		$	249		$	449

Investment product sales	$	663		$	773		$	1,278		$	1,517

Average policyholder fund balances	$	8,319		$	7,674		$	8,280		$	7,603
Average separate account policyholder fund balances		336			455			336			474

	$	8,655		$	8,129		$	8,616		$	8,077


Effective investment spreads for fixed annuities		1.88	%		1.82	%		1.89	%		1.83	%
Fixed annuity surrenders as a percentage of beginning fund balances		7.8	%		10.2	%		7.9	%		9.8	%

Average assets	$	9,449		$	8,963		$	9,427		$	8,899

We derive annuity revenues from investment income on segment assets, policy charges and concession income earned on investment product sales by JPSC. Our policy charge income declined $0.9 and $1.7 from the second quarter and first six months of 2002 as a result of lower surrender charge income due to historically low surrenders. Net investment income grew 4.6% and 4.0% over the second quarter and first six months of 2002, which was lower than the growth in average policyholder fund balances of 6.5% and 6.7%, primarily due to a decline in new investment yields. The AIP segment experienced prepayments of mortgage backed securities, which increased net investment income in the AIP segment through acceleration of the accretion of discount on our mortgage backed portfolio. The excess accretion of discount as a result of these prepayments was $5.0 and $8.5 in the second quarter and first half of 2003 compared to $0.1 and $2.5 for the same periods of 2002. Fixed annuity premium sales decreased 48.4% and 44.1% from the second quarter and first six months of 2002, reflecting continued competition in the fixed annuity market and our unwillingness to match our competitors’ crediting rates, especially in our bank channel. Consistent with a decrease in investment product sales, JPSC’s concession and other income decreased 15.1% and 13.9% from the second quarter and first half of 2002.

Fixed annuity surrenders as a percentage of beginning fund balances on an annualized basis declined to 7.8% versus 10.2% and 7.9% versus 9.8% from the second quarter and first six months of 2002. The lower lapse rates reflect the effects of increased surrender charge protection within our in-force block of business, the lower interest rate environment and the increasing percentage of our annuity block with multi-year crediting rate guarantees. The surrender rate in the AIP segment is influenced by many other factors such as: 1) the portion of the business that has low or no remaining surrender charges; 2) competition from annuity products including those which pay up-front interest rate bonuses or higher market rates and 3) rising interest rates that may make returns available on new annuities or investment products more attractive than our older annuities. Fixed annuity fund balances with 5% or more surrender charges were 52% of total fixed annuity fund balances at June 30, 2003 compared to 49% a year earlier.

Policy benefits, which are mainly comprised of interest credited to policyholder accounts, were flat compared to second quarter 2002 and increased 1.9% over the first six months of 2002, reflecting crediting rate reductions despite growth in average fund balances.

Effective investment spreads on fixed annuities increased to 1.88% and 1.89% from 1.82% and 1.83% for the second quarter and first six months of 2002. We are continuing to realize the effects of crediting rate reductions we made in late 2002 and during the first half of 2003, which generally take effect on annuity contract anniversary dates. The average crediting rate on the portfolio decreased to 5.02% and 5.10% in the second quarter and first six months of 2003 from 5.48% and 5.49% for the same 2002 periods. We have approximately $4 billion of policyholder fund balances with crediting rates on an annual reset basis, and our crediting rates are approximately 75 basis points on average in excess of our minimum guaranteed rates at June 30, 2003. We also have approximately $3 billion of policyholder fund balances with multi-year guaranteed rates, which will begin to expire in about eighteen months. As mentioned earlier, increased accretion of discount on mortgage backed securities is also continuing to positively impact our investment spreads.

The expense details for the AIP segment are as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30

	2003			2002			2003			2002

Commissions – insurance companies	$	7.0		$	11.9		$	13.0		$	23.1
Commissions – broker/dealer		19.1			23.0			37.2			44.5
General and administrative – acquisition related		2.6			3.4			6.3			7.1
General and administrative – maintenance related		3.7			4.1			6.4			7.2
Taxes, licenses and fees		0.8			0.8			1.5			1.5

Total commissions and expenses incurred		33.2			43.2			64.4			83.4
Less commissions and expenses capitalized		(9.2	)		(15.2	)		(18.5	)		(29.8	)
Amortization of DAC and VOBA		12.1			10.2			23.6			21.0

Total expense	$	36.1		$	38.2		$	69.5		$	74.6

Total AIP expenses decreased 5.5% and 6.8% from the second quarter and first six months of 2002, due primarily to lower commission expenses of JPSC. However, we continue to closely manage the maintenance related general and administrative expenses, which declined 9.8% and 11.1% from the second quarter and first six months of 2002.

JPSC earnings were $1.0 and $2.2 for the second quarter and first six months of 2003 compared to $1.0 and $2.0 for the same 2002 periods.

An inherent risk in the annuity business is that continued low or further declines in investment yields coupled with competition from competing products and minimum rate guarantees could further reduce our investment spread and reduce annuity sales. Other risks associated with the annuity business include increased lapses when interest rates rise, particularly in the portion of business subject to low or no surrender charges, and changes in taxation of our products and competing offerings. We discuss these risks in more detail in the Financial Position, Capital Resources and Liquidity, and Market Risk Exposures sections of our Form 10-K.

Benefit Partners

The Benefit Partners segment offers group non-medical products such as term life, disability and dental insurance to the employer marketplace. These products are marketed primarily through a national distribution system of regional offices. These offices develop business through employee benefit brokers, third party administrators and other employee benefit firms. Reportable segment results were:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30

	2003		2002		2003		2002

Premiums and other considerations	$	191.3	$	162.0	$	373.1	$	310.4
Investment income, net of expenses		16.5		14.6		32.4		29.6

Total revenues		207.8		176.6		405.5		340.0

Policy benefits		147.8		120.9		285.5		230.1
Expenses		40.7		36.5		82.4		70.8

Total benefits and expenses		188.5		157.4		367.9		300.9

Reportable segment results before income taxes		19.3		19.2		37.6		39.1
Provision for income taxes		6.8		6.7		13.2		13.7

Reportable segment results	$	12.5	$	12.5	$	24.4	$	25.4

Benefit Partners reportable segment results were flat for the second quarter and decreased 3.9% compared to the first six months of 2002 as discussed below.

The following table summarizes key information for Benefit Partners:


		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
		June 30						June 30

		2003			2002			2003			2002

Life, Disability, and Dental:
	Annualized sales	$	40		$	37		$	113		$	93
	Loss ratio		74.7	%		73.1	%		74.3	%		72.4	%

Total expenses, % of premium income			21.4	%		22.7	%		22.2	%		22.9	%

Average assets		$	962		$	838		$	945		$	822

Benefit Partners revenues increased 17.7% and 19.3% over the second quarter and first six months of 2002. Annualized new sales for the core life, disability and dental lines grew 8.1% and 21.5% over the second quarter and first six months of 2002, reflecting continued distribution channel growth, the maturation of the sales force selling these products under the Jefferson Pilot name, our strong ratings and our technology driven customer service.

Policy benefits increased 22.2% and 24.1% over the second quarter and first six months of 2002 driven by growth in the business coupled with adverse claims experience during the first six months of 2003 in the life product line. Our life, disability and dental incurred loss ratio increased to 74.7% versus 73.1% and 74.3% versus 72.4% from the second quarter and first six months of 2002 due to the adverse mortality experienced in the life product line. While loss ratios for our life products are

higher than levels we would expect, they did improve measurably from first quarter 2003. During the quarter we engaged an outside consulting firm to assist us in studying the mortality experience of our life block. Following this study, we are continuing our evaluation and anticipate making certain adjustments in our underwriting practices to reduce potential anti-selection as well as pricing adjustments to selected cells of business to provide more satisfactory results going forward.

Total expenses for the Benefit Partners segment increased 11.5% and 16.4% over the second quarter and first six months of 2002, due to overall growth in the business. As a percentage of premium income, total expenses were 21.4% versus 22.7% and 22.2% versus 22.9% for the second quarter and first half of 2002.

The expense details are as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30

	2003			2002			2003			2002

Commissions	$	21.6		$	18.5		$	42.4		$	36.1
General and administrative		18.2			16.7			37.7			33.6
Taxes, licenses and fees		5.0			5.0			10.3			9.0

Total commissions and expenses incurred		44.8			40.2			90.4			78.7
Less commissions and expenses capitalized		(28.9	)		(24.0	)		(57.2	)		(45.1	)
Amortization of DAC		24.8			20.3			49.2			37.2

Total expense	$	40.7		$	36.5		$	82.4		$	70.8

Acquisition costs consisting of commissions and other expenses that are primarily related to contracts issued or renewed are capitalized and are charged to expense in proportion to the revenue recognized. The amount of acquisition costs capitalized as well as the amount amortized grew in proportion with the increase in sales for the second quarter and first six months of 2003.

Risks beyond normal competition that may impact this segment include: 1) increased morbidity risk due to a weak economy that may increase disability claim costs; 2) continued medical cost inflation that can put pressure on non-medical benefit premium rates because employers may focus more on the employer’s cost of non-medical programs; and 3) mortality risks including concentration risks from acts of terrorism not priced for or reinsured. We discuss these risks in more detail in the Benefit Partners section of our Form 10-K.

Communications

JPCC operates radio and television broadcast properties and produces syndicated sports programming. Reportable segment results were:


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30				June 30

	2003		2002		2003		2002

Communications revenues (net)	$	50.7	$	50.0	$	101.2	$	98.6
Operating costs and expenses		27.6		27.8		62.3		61.5

Broadcast cash flow		23.1		22.2		38.9		37.1
Depreciation and amortization		2.1		1.9		4.2		3.8
Corporate general and administrative expenses		1.2		1.9		2.7		3.2
Net interest expense		0.5		0.7		1.1		1.5

Operating revenue before income taxes		19.3		17.7		30.9		28.6
Provision for income taxes		7.8		7.1		12.3		11.5

Reportable segment results	$	11.5	$	10.6	$	18.6	$	17.1

Reportable segment results increased 8.5% and 8.8% over the second quarter and first six months of 2002, primarily due to increased demand for advertising, increased share in our Television and Radio markets and effective ongoing operating expense management.

Combined revenues for Radio and Television increased 1.3% and 3.0% over the second quarter and first half of 2002, reflecting solid increases in demand for local advertising in Television and national advertising in Radio. Political revenues for combined Radio and Television declined by $0.5 from the second quarter and first half of 2002. Disregarding revenues from political advertising, combined revenues for Radio and Television increased 2.3% and 3.6% over the second quarter and first half of 2002. The second quarter is typically a slow period for Sports with minimal collegiate activity.

Broadcast cash flow increased 4.1% and 4.9% over the second quarter and first half of 2002 due to improved profitability at our Radio and Television properties, despite disappointing first quarter 2003 results in our Sports basketball product.

Total expenses, excluding interest expense, decreased $0.7 or 2.2% from the second quarter and increased $0.7 or 1.0% over the first half of 2002. As a percent of communication revenues, these expenses were 60.9% versus 63.2% and 68.4% versus 69.5% in the second quarter and first six months of 2003 and 2002, reflecting continued expense discipline in this segment.

Risks for this segment include sensitivity to cyclical changes in both the general economy and the economic strength of local markets, concentration of our advertising revenues from the automotive industry, the ability to periodically renew FCC licenses, technological changes and consolidation in the broadcast industry. We discuss these risks in more detail in the Communications section of our Form 10-K.

Corporate and Other

The Corporate and Other segment includes the excess capital of the insurance subsidiaries, other corporate investments including impaired securities, benefit plan net assets, goodwill related to insurance acquisitions and corporate debt. The reportable segment results primarily contain the earnings on the invested excess capital, interest expense related to the corporate debt and operating expenses that are corporate in nature (such as advertising and charitable and civic contributions). All net realized capital gains and losses, which include all impairments of securities, are reported in this segment.

The following table summarizes results for this segment:


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30						June 30

	2003			2002			2003			2002

Earnings on investments	$	22.3		$	22.1		$	43.9		$	43.1
Interest expense on debt and Exchangeable Securities		2.1			2.6			4.6			5.0
Operating expenses		6.7			7.3			13.0			12.2
Provision for income tax expense		0.3			0.8			1.7			1.2

Total expenses		9.1			10.7			19.3			18.4

Reportable segment results before dividends on Capital Securities		13.2			11.4			24.6			24.7
Dividends on Capital Securities		(6.2	)		(6.2	)		(12.3	)		(12.3	)

Reportable segment results		7.0			5.2			12.3			12.4
Realized investment gains, net		13.2			2.8			0.8			24.7

Reportable segment results, including realized gains	$	20.2		$	8.0		$	13.1		$	37.1

Reportable segment results excluding realized gains increased $1.8 from the second quarter and declined $0.1 from the first half of 2002. Several items impacted results, including an increase in earnings on investments due to increased default charge income, resumed income in the second quarter of this year on certain previously defaulted securities, lower interest expense on debt and lower quarterly operating expenses in this segment as further discussed below.

The earnings on investments for this segment include default charge income received from the operating segments for this segment’s assumption of all credit related losses on the invested assets of those segments. Default charges are calculated in part as a percentage of invested assets. In response to the recent default environment in the securities market, we increased default charges to the other operating segments. This resulted in default charge income of $7.7 and $14.6 for the second quarter and first six months compared to $5.7 and $10.9 for the same periods of 2002. Earnings on investments in this segment can fluctuate based upon opportunistic repurchases of common stock, the amount of excess capital generated by the operating segments and investment income fluctuations on bonds impaired or sold, among other factors.

Operating expenses declined $0.6 from the second quarter and increased $0.8 over the first six months of last year. The increase in the first half was primarily caused by the expensing in the first quarter of stock options granted to our Premier Partners. Operating expenses for this segment vary with the level of corporate activities and strategies.

The provision for income tax expense includes the tax benefit of preferred dividends on Capital Securities, which we record gross of related tax effects.

Realized investment gains and losses were as follows:


		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
		June 30						June 30

		2003			2002			2003			2002

Bonds gains		$	22.5		$	9.5		$	36.8		$	12.2
Bond losses			(1.9	)		(7.1	)		(4.7	)		(12.1	)
Bond impairment charges			(12.1	)		(39.5	)		(41.1	)		(52.8	)
Stock gains (net)			13.8			42.1			13.8			94.0
Other losses			(2.0	)		(0.7	)		(3.6	)		(3.3	)

Gross realized gains			20.3			4.3			1.2			38.0
	Less: taxes		(7.1	)		(1.5	)		(0.4	)		(13.3	)

Net realized gains		$	13.2		$	2.8		$	0.8		$	24.7

The level of bond write-downs and losses for second quarter 2003 was the lowest in seven quarters, a result of significant improvement in the corporate credit environment and proactive portfolio management. Approximately 60% of the bond gains realized in second quarter 2003 were on previously written down securities, which we sold after their prices improved in order to reposition our holdings. We also elected to realize gains on equity securities due to the recent increase in the equity markets, especially of our investment in Bank of America common stock.

The following table summarizes assets assigned to this segment.


		June 30

		2003		2002

Parent company, passive investment companies and Corporate line assets of insurance subsidiaries		$	1,042	$	901
Unrealized gain on fixed interest investments			867		334
Co-insurance receivables on acquired blocks			1,045		1,084
Employee benefit plan assets			344		349
Goodwill arising from insurance acquisitions			270		270
Other			318		330

	Total	$	3,886	$	3,268

Total assets for the Corporate and Other segment increased 18.9% over June 30, 2002 due primarily to unrealized gains on fixed interest investments. Unrealized gains and losses on all available-for-sale fixed income securities, which are assigned to this segment, increased $533.

Risks for this segment include investment impairments and defaults due to continuing economic weakness or further economic decline, the risk of rising interest rates on our short-term debt, the ability to replace existing debt agreements with comparable terms, declines in the values of our equity securities which would limit our potential for realized gains, the general uncertainty regarding litigation, and the potential for future impairment of goodwill. Additionally, as discussed in the Liquidity section, to service our debt and to pay shareholder dividends, this segment relies on excess cash flows through dividends from the insurance subsidiaries. These dividends depend upon regulatory approval when above certain limits.

Financial Position

Our primary resources are investments related to our Individual Products, AIP and Benefit Partners segments, properties and other assets utilized in all segments and investments backing corporate capital. This section identifies several items on our balance sheet that are important to the overall understanding of our financial position. The Investments section reviews our investment portfolio and key portfolio management strategies.

Total assets increased $1,069 from year end 2002 due to growth in investment income, net policyholder contract deposits, and unrealized gains on investments, all of which more than offset declines in fair values of separate account assets, dividends, stock repurchases and impairment losses.

Intangible assets on our balance sheet include DAC, VOBA and goodwill.

DAC and VOBA

The Individual Products, AIP and Benefit Partners segments defer the costs of acquiring new business, which is referred to as DAC. These costs include first year commissions, first year bonus interest or day one premium bonuses on annuities, certain costs of underwriting and issuing policies plus agency office expenses. We limit our capitalization of acquisition costs other than commissions in the Individual Products and AIP segments to the lower of product specific pricing allowable or the actual deferrable acquisition costs. When we acquire new business through an acquisition, we allocate a portion of the purchase price to a separately identifiable intangible asset, referred to as VOBA. We initially establish VOBA as the actuarially determined present value of future gross profits of each business acquired. Both DAC and VOBA are amortized through expenses as revenues are recognized in the future. Some of the assumptions regarding future experience that can affect the carrying value of DAC and VOBA balances include mortality, interest spreads, lapse rates and policy fees earned. Significant differences between actual experience and assumptions utilized can impact the carrying balance of DAC and VOBA and therefore produce changes that must be reflected in earnings. These changes can be positive or negative.

We amortize DAC and VOBA on traditional products (including the products in our Benefit Partners segment) in proportion to premium revenue recognized. The DAC and VOBA balances on these products were $203.0 or 8.4% of the gross balances at June 30, 2003 compared to $208.2 or 8.9% at December 31, 2002, and are generally subject to little volatility.

We amortize DAC and VOBA on UL-type products and annuity products relative to the future estimated gross profits (EGP) from those products. In calculating the EGP for these products, management must make assumptions regarding the following components: 1) estimates of fees charged to policyholders to cover mortality, surrenders and maintenance costs; 2) estimated mortality in excess of fund balances accumulated; 3) expected interest rate spreads between income earned and amounts credited to policyholder accounts; and 4) estimated costs of policy administration (maintenance). DAC and VOBA calculations are sensitive to a change in our assumptions regarding EGP components, and any significant change in these assumptions will immediately impact the current DAC and VOBA balances with the change reflected through the income statement. We continuously review the models and our assumptions regarding EGP that we use for calculation of amortization expense for these products so that the assumptions reflect management’s view of future events.

We consider the following assumptions to be most significant to UL-type products: 1) estimated mortality; 2) estimated interest spreads; and 3) estimated future policy lapses. The DAC and VOBA balances on UL-type products were $1,799.0 or 74.4% of the gross balances at June 30, 2003 compared to $1,711.3 or 73.3% at December 31, 2002.

In addition to these three assumptions on all UL-type products, VUL products and VA products contain an additional assumption that affects the DAC and VOBA amortization. This critical assumption is the rate of growth of the separate account mutual funds that generate additional policy fees utilized in the EGP on VUL and VA products. We assume a long-term total net return on separate account assets, including dividends and market value increases, of 8.25% and a five-year reversion period. The reversion period is a period over which a short-term return assumption is used to maintain the model’s overall long-term rate of return. We cap the reversion rate of return at 8.25% for one year and 10% for years two through five. The effect of this limitation is to reduce the cumulative effective long-term rate.

We provided a sensitivity analysis of changes in significant assumptions to DAC and VOBA relating to UL-type products in the Individual Products segment discussion in our Form 10-K. In the first six months of 2003, no variances were significant enough to have caused us to change the significant assumptions utilized in this analysis or its estimated results.

We consider estimated interest spreads and estimated future policy lapses to be the most significant assumptions related to our annuity products. The DAC and VOBA balances on these products were $350.5 or 14.5% of the gross balances at June 30, 2003 compared to $356.6 or 15.3% at December 31, 2002. We provided a sensitivity analysis of changes in significant assumptions to DAC and VOBA relating to annuity products in our Form 10-K. In the first six months of 2003, no variances were significant enough to have caused us to change the significant assumptions or the estimated results utilized in this analysis.

We also adjust the carrying value of DAC and VOBA to reflect changes in the unrealized gains and losses in available-for-sale securities since this impacts the timing of and possible realization of EGP’s.

Goodwill

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which primarily addresses the accounting for goodwill and intangible assets subsequent to their acquisition. Under SFAS 142, we test goodwill for impairment at least on an annual basis. Goodwill was $312 at June 30, 2003 or 8.1% as a percentage of stockholders’ equity. We regularly review the carrying amounts for indications of value impairment, considering financial performance and other relevant factors such as a significant adverse change in the business or legal climate, an adverse action or assessment by a regulator, or unanticipated competition. Nothing indicated an impairment of goodwill during the first six months of 2003. When considered impaired, the carrying amounts are required to be written down to a value determined by using a combination of fair value and discounted cash flows.

Other

At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, we had reinsurance receivables of $869 and $889 and policy loans of $133 and $135, which are related to the businesses of JP Financial that are coinsured

with Household International (HI), affiliates. HI has provided payment, performance and capital maintenance guarantees with respect to the balances receivable. We regularly evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor concentrations of credit risk related to reinsurance activities. We have not suffered any significant credit losses from reinsurance activities in the last three years.

At June 30, 2003, the fair values of the assets related to the defined benefit pension plans were $344 compared to $331 at December 31, 2002. The increase in plan assets of $13 reflects an increase in unrealized gains on securities in the portfolio. Additionally, at December 31, 2002, we lowered the discount rate to 6.75% from 7.00% in the calculation of the Projected Benefit Obligation (PBO) and will utilize that rate for the calculation of expense in 2003. Lowering this discount rate will eventually lead to a higher pension expense over time.

Capital Resources

Stockholders’ Equity

The following table shows our capital adequacy.


	June 30			December 31
	2003			2002

Total assets less separate accounts	$	29,762		$	28,824
Total stockholders’ equity		3,871			3,540
Ratio of stockholders’ equity to assets less separate accounts		13.0	%		12.3	%

The ratio of equity to assets less separate accounts has remained relatively constant in recent years. Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, which are included as a component of stockholders’ equity, increased $220 from year-end 2002, reflecting an increase in the bond and equity securities markets.

During the first six months of 2003, we repurchased 1,500,000 of our common shares at an average cost of $39.01 per share.

We consider existing capital resources to be more than adequate to support the current level of our business activities.

The Individual Products, AIP and Benefit Partners segments are subject to regulatory constraints. Our insurance subsidiaries have statutory surplus and risk based capital levels well above required levels. These capital levels together with the rating agencies’ assessments of our business strategies have enabled our major life insurance affiliates to attain the highest available claims paying ratings by A.M. Best and Standard & Poor’s and the second highest rating by Fitch Ratings.

Short-Term Borrowings and Debt

We have bank credit agreements for unsecured revolving credit, under which we have the option to borrow at various interest rates. The two agreements currently aggregate $525 with half available until May of 2004 and half available until May of 2007. The credit agreements principally support our issuance of commercial paper. Outstanding commercial paper has various maturities, with none at June 30, 2003 in excess of 90 days, although maturities can be up to 270 days. If we cannot remarket commercial paper at maturity, we have sufficient liquidity, consisting of the bank credit agreements, liquid assets, such as equity securities, and other resources to retire these obligations.

The weighted-average interest rates for commercial paper borrowings outstanding of $528 and $453 at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 were 1.13% and 1.44%. The maximum amount outstanding during the first six months of 2003 was $529 versus $455 for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Our commercial paper has retained the highest ratings by Standard & Poor’s and Fitch Ratings as detailed in our Form 10-K. A significant drop in these ratings, while not anticipated, could cause us to pay higher rates on commercial paper borrowings or lose access to the commercial paper market.

Our insurance subsidiaries have sold U.S. Treasury obligations and collateralized mortgage obligations under repurchase agreements involving various counterparties, accounted for as financing arrangements. We may use proceeds to purchase securities with longer durations as an asset/liability management strategy. We also may use repurchase agreements from time to time in lieu of commercial paper borrowings. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, repurchase agreements, including accrued interest, were $376 and $499, which include $72 and $244 of repurchase agreements in lieu of commercial paper borrowings. The securities involved had a fair value and amortized cost of $313 and $287 at June 30, 2003 versus $532 and $493 at December 31, 2002. The maximum principal amounts outstanding were $444 during the first six months of 2003 compared to $636 for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Under SFAS 150, effective with the third quarter 2003, we will account for our Capital Securities as a liability rather than as mezzanine financing. Accordingly, the payments to the holders of the Capital Securities will be included in interest expense rather than as dividends. Prior amounts will not be restated, and this change will only result in reclassifications on the balance sheets and statements of income.

Liquidity

We meet liquidity requirements primarily by positive cash flows from the operations of subsidiaries. We have sufficient overall sources of liquidity to satisfy operating requirements. Primary sources of cash from our insurance operations are premiums, other insurance considerations, receipts for policyholder accounts, investment sales and maturities and investment income. Primary uses of cash for our insurance operations include purchases of investments, payment of insurance benefits, operating expenses, withdrawals from policyholder accounts, costs related to acquiring new business, dividends and income taxes. Primary sources of cash from the Communications operations are revenues from broadcast advertising, and primary uses include payments for commissions, compensation and related costs, sports rights, interest, income taxes and purchases of fixed assets.

Cash provided by operations in the first six months of 2003 and 2002 was $220 and $113. The primary drivers of this increase are larger increases in policy reserves to $93.2 in 2003 from $22.7 for the first six months of 2002 and the swing in gains realized on the sale of investments to $1.2 for the first half of 2003 from a $38.0 loss for the prior period, both of which serve as adjustments to cash generated from operations.

Net cash used in investing activities was $475 and $659 for the first half of 2003 and 2002. The 2002 amount included the investment of approximately $208 of single premiums received in late 2001.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $240 and $442 for the first six months of 2003 and 2002, including cash inflows from policyholder contract deposits net of withdrawals of $435 and $668, reflecting the processing of the premiums received in late 2001 combined with lower policyholder contract deposits in 2003 in connection with the decline in fixed annuity sales. Net borrowings declined in 2003 as funds were used to pay down debt rather than for investing purposes.

In order to meet the parent company’s dividend payments, debt servicing obligations and other expenses, we receive dividends from subsidiaries. Subsidiaries paid total cash dividends during the first six months of $146 and $183 in 2003 and 2002. Our life insurance subsidiaries are subject to laws in their states of domicile that limit the amount of dividends that can be paid without the prior approval of the respective state’s insurance regulator. The limits are based in part on the prior year’s statutory income and capital, which are negatively impacted by bond losses and write-downs. Approval of dividends above these limits will depend upon the circumstances at the time, but we have not experienced problems with state approvals in the past.

Cash and cash equivalents were $52 and $67 at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002. The parent company and non-regulated subsidiaries held equity and fixed income securities of $725 and $424 at these dates. We consider the majority of these securities to be sources of liquidity to support our strategies.

Total debt and equity securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 were $17,972 and $16,874.

Off Balance Sheet Liabilities and Commitments

One of our subsidiaries entered into an agreement with an unaffiliated third party to provide for the initial and periodic purchase of the majority of its loans receivable. This agreement is renewable on an annual basis and the amount of loans involved continued to decline. If the agreement is not renewed, we can issue debt to fund the amounts or terminate the entire program. The amount of loans outstanding at June 30, 2003 was $12 compared to $16 at December 31, 2002. We have no other off balance sheet arrangements of a financing nature.

JPCC has commitments for purchases of syndicated television programming and commitments on other contracts and future sports programming rights of approximately $407 as of June 30, 2003, payable through the year 2011. We have commitments to sell a portion of the sports programming rights to other entities for $248 over the same period. These commitments are not reflected as an asset or liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet because the programs are not currently available for use. We expect advertising revenues that are sold on an annual basis to fund the purchase commitments.

We routinely enter into commitments to extend credit in the form of mortgage loans and to purchase certain debt instruments in private placement transactions for our investment portfolio. The fair value of such outstanding commitments as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 approximated $115 and $73. These commitments will be funded through cash flows from operations and investment maturities.

Investments

Portfolio Description

Our strategy for managing the investment portfolio of our insurance subsidiaries is to consistently meet pricing assumptions while appropriately managing credit risk. We invest for the long term, and most of our investments are held until they mature. Our investment portfolio includes primarily fixed income securities and commercial mortgage loans. The nature and quality of investments our insurance subsidiaries hold must comply with state regulatory requirements. We have established a formal investment policy, which describes our overall quality and diversification objectives and limits.

The following table shows the carrying values of our invested assets. Approximately 80% of our portfolio has been designated as available-for-sale (AFS) and is carried on the balance sheet at fair value. We determine fair values of our securities, including securities not actively traded, using the methodology described in the Critical Accounting Policies section above. Changes in fair values of AFS securities are reflected in other comprehensive income. The remainder of our portfolio has been designated as held-to-maturity (HTM). As prescribed by generally accepted accounting principles, HTM securities are carried at amortized cost, and accordingly there will be a difference between fair value and carrying value for HTM securities.


		June 30				December 31
		2003				2002

Publicly-issued bonds		$	15,698	62.1	%	$	15,239	62.6	%
Privately-placed bonds			4,448	17.6			4,238	17.4

	Subtotal bonds		20,146	79.7			19,477	80.0
Redeemable preferred stock			25	0.1			24	0.1

	Subtotal debt securities		20,171	79.8			19,501	80.1
Mortgage loans on real property			3,267	12.9			3,294	13.5
Common stock			711	2.8			407	1.7
Non-redeemable preferred stock			2	0.1			2	0.0
Policy loans			901	3.6			909	3.7
Real estate			131	0.5			133	0.6
Other			34	0.1			33	0.1
Cash and equivalents			52	0.2			67	0.3

	Total	$	25,269	100.0	%	$	24,346	100.0	%

The table above reflects the increase in our non-insurance subsidiaries’ investments in common stocks by $250 in the second quarter, which we view as attractive for capital appreciation as well as dividend yields.

Credit Risk Management and Impairment Review

Our internal guidelines require an average quality of an S&P or equivalent rating of “A” or higher for the entire bond portfolio. At June 30, 2003 the average quality rating of our bond portfolio was “A”. We monitor the overall credit quality of our portfolio within internal investment guidelines. This table describes our debt security portfolio by credit rating at June 30, 2003.


	S&P or							% of
SVO	Equivalent	Amortized		Fair		Carrying		Carrying
Rating	Designation	Cost		Value		Value		Value

1	AAA	$	4,175	$	4,430	$	4,425		21.9	%
1	AA		1,827		2,002		1,982		9.8
1	A		5,220		5,772		5,662		28.1
2	BBB		6,150		6,706		6,587		32.7
3	BB		707		710		710		3.5
4	B		527		511		514		2.5
5	CCC and lower		210		190		194		1.0
6	In or near default		93		93		97		0.5

	Total	$	18,909	$	20,414	$	20,171		100.0	%

Limiting our bond exposure to any one creditor is another way we manage credit risk. The following table lists our ten largest exposures to an individual creditor in our bond portfolio as of June 30, 2003. As noted above, the carrying values in the following tables are stated at fair value for AFS securities and amortized cost for HTM securities.


		Carrying
Creditor	Sector	Value

General Electric	Capital Goods	$	94
National City	Banks		92
Bank of America	Banks		91
National Rural Utilities	Utilities		91
U. S. Bancorp	Banks		90
Citigroup	Banks		88
HSBC Holdings PLC	Banks		87
Scana	Utilities		87
Cargill	Consumer Non-Cyclical		86
Burlington Northern Santa Fe	Transportation		86

As noted above, credit risk is inherent in our bond portfolio. We manage this risk through a structured approach in which we assess the effects of the changing economic landscape. We devote a significant amount of effort of both highly specialized, well-trained internal resources and external experts in our approach to managing credit risk.

To identify “potentially distressed securities”, we first screen for all securities that have a fair value to amortized cost ratio of less than 80%. As part of this identification process, management must make assumptions and judgments using the following information:

• current fair value of the security compared to amortized cost

• length of time the fair value was below amortized cost

• industry factors or conditions related to a geographic area that are negatively affecting the security

• downgrades by a rating agency

• past due interest or principal payments or other violation of covenants

• deterioration of the overall financial condition of the specific issuer

In analyzing securities for other-than-temporary impairments, we then pay special attention to securities that have been potentially distressed for a period greater than six months. We assume that, absent reliable contradictory evidence, a security that is potentially distressed for a continuous period greater than twelve months has incurred an other-than-temporary impairment. Such reliable contradictory evidence might include, among other factors, a liquidation analysis performed by our investment professionals and consultants, improving financial performance or valuation of underlying assets specifically pledged to support the credit.

When we identify a security as potentially impaired, we add it to our potentially distressed security list and determine if the impairment is other than temporary. Various committees comprised of senior management and investment analysts intensively review the potentially distressed security list to determine if a security is deemed to be other than temporarily impaired. In this review, we consider the following criteria:

• fundamental analysis of the liquidity and financial condition of the specific issuer

• underlying valuation of assets specifically pledged to support the credit

• time period in which the fair value has been significantly below amortized cost

• industry sector or geographic area applicable to the specific issuer

• our ability and intent to retain the investment for a sufficient time to recover its value

When this intensive review determines that the decline is other than temporary, the security is written down to fair value through a charge to realized investment gains and losses. We adjust the amortized cost for both AFS and HTM securities that have experienced other-than-temporary impairments to reflect fair value at the time of the impairment. We consider factors that lead to an other-than-temporary impairment of a particular security in order to determine whether these conditions have impacted other similar securities.

Below Investment Grade Securities

We monitor those securities that are rated below investment grade as to individual exposures and in comparison to the entire portfolio, as an additional credit risk management strategy.

The following table shows the ten largest below investment grade debt security exposures by individual creditor at June 30, 2003.


						Gross
		Amortized		Carrying		Unrealized
Creditor	Sector	Cost		Value		Gain/(Loss)

El Paso	Utilities	$	65	$	63	$	(3	)
Rite Aid	Consumer Cyclical		48		44		(5	)
Qwest Communications	Communications		45		41		(4	)
Ahold, Royal	Consumer Cyclical		40		40		(1	)
Intertape Polymer Group	Basic Materials		35		33		(1	)
Tenet Healthcare	Consumer Non-Cyclical		33		31		(2	)
Thomas & Betts Company	Capital Goods		28		28		—
Homer City Funding LLC	Energy		25		27		2
Carolina Tractor Equipment	Capital Goods		25		26		1
Williams Companies	Utilities		25		25		1

Bonds of these creditors that are investment grade are not included in these values. Securities of some of these creditors are also on the potentially distressed security list and are subject to additional analysis for other-than-temporary impairment.

At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, below investment grade bonds were $1,515 or 7.5% and $1,287 or 6.6% of the carrying value of the bond portfolio. These are higher than our historical exposures. We constantly monitor our below investment grade bonds and evaluate our exposure as a percentage of the total portfolio.

Unrealized Gains and Losses

The majority of our unrealized gains and losses can be attributed to changes in interest rates and market changes in credit spreads, which have caused temporary price fluctuations. However, within the specific bonds with unrealized losses, we further stratify and analyze them as discussed above to determine if the unrealized loss is other than temporary.

The following table summarizes by category the unrealized gains and losses in our entire securities portfolios, including common stock and redeemable preferred stock, as of June 30, 2003.


				Gross		Gross
		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair		Carrying
		Cost		Gains		Losses			Value		Value

Available-for-sale, carried at fair value:
US Treasury obligations and direct obligations of US Government agencies		$	241	$	29	$	—		$	270	$	270
Federal agency mortgage backed securities (including collateralized mortgage obligations)			2,808		159		(1	)		2,966		2,966
Obligations of states and political subdivisions			55		5		—			60		60
Corporate obligations			11,494		1,100		(105	)		12,489		12,489
Corporate private-labeled mortgage backed securities (including collateralized mortgage obligations)			1,375		77		(3	)		1,449		1,449
Redeemable preferred stock			24		1		—			25		25

	Subtotal, debt securities		15,997		1,371		(109	)		17,259		17,259
Non-redeemable preferred stock			1		1		—			2		2
Common stock			294		420		(3	)		711		711

Securities available-for-sale			16,292		1,792		(112	)		17,972		17,972

Held-to-maturity, carried at amortized cost:
Obligations of state and political subdivisions			9		2		—			11		9
Corporate obligations			2,903		263		(22	)		3,144		2,903

Debt securities held-to-maturity			2,912		265		(22	)		3,155		2,912

Total AFS and HTM securities		$	19,204	$	2,057	$	(134	)	$	21,127	$	20,884

These unrealized gains and losses do not necessarily represent future gains or losses that we will realize. Changing conditions related to specific bonds, overall market interest rates or credit spreads as well as our decisions concerning the timing of any sales may impact values we ultimately realize. Gross unrealized gains and losses at December 31, 2002 were $1,716 and $(290).

The following table shows the diversification of unrealized gains and losses for our debt securities portfolio across industry sectors as of June 30, 2003:


					Gross		Gross
			Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair		Carrying
			Cost		Gains		Losses			Value		Value

Industrials
	Basic Materials		$	1,203	$	97	$	(13	)	$	1,287	$	1,262
	Capital Goods			916		78		(6	)		988		974
	Communications			505		64		(6	)		563		550
	Consumer Cyclical			1,970		173		(19	)		2,124		2,081
	Consumer Non-Cyclical			1,311		124		(5	)		1,430		1,406
	Energy			1,184		112		(1	)		1,295		1,282
	Technology			219		9		(6	)		222		220
	Transportation			731		78		(25	)		784		773
	Other Industrials			354		43		—			397		393
Utilities				2,903		285		(25	)		3,163		3,114
Financials
	Banks			1,779		197		(12	)		1,964		1,934
	Insurance			395		30		(1	)		424		421
	Other Financials			1,256		110		(8	)		1,358		1,346
Mortgage Backed Securities (including Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities)				4,183		236		(4	)		4,415		4,415

		Total	$	18,909	$	1,636	$	(131	)	$	20,414	$	20,171

We monitor unrealized losses through further analysis according to maturity date, credit quality, individual creditor exposure and the length of time the individual security has continuously been in an unrealized loss position.

The following table shows the maturity date distribution of our debt securities in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2003. The fair values of these securities could fluctuate over the respective periods to maturity or any sale.


						Gross
		Amortized		Fair		Unrealized			Carrying
		Cost		Value		Losses			Value

Due in one year or less		$	21	$	18	$	(3	)	$	18
Due after one year through five years			381		352		(29	)		362
Due after five years through ten years			518		496		(22	)		501
Due after ten years through twenty years			582		528		(54	)		534
Due after twenty years			241		227		(14	)		228
Amounts not due at a single maturity date			81		72		(9	)		72

	Subtotal		1,824		1,693		(131	)		1,715
Redeemable preferred stocks			4		4		—			4

	Total	$	1,828	$	1,697	$	(131	)	$	1,719

The following table shows the credit quality of our debt securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2003.


	S&P or					% of			Gross			% of Gross
SVO	Equivalent	Amortized		Fair		Fair			Unrealized			Unrealized			Carrying
Rating	Designation	Cost		Value		Value			Losses			Losses			Value

1	AAA/AA/A	$	497	$	470		27.7	%	$	(27	)		20.6	%	$	472
2	BBB		568		542		31.9			(26	)		19.8			549
3	BB		258		233		13.7			(25	)		19.1			236
4	B		286		259		15.3			(27	)		20.6			262
5	CCC and lower		197		175		10.3			(22	)		16.8			178
6	In or near default		22		18		1.1			(4	)		3.1			22

	Total	$	1,828	$	1,697		100.0	%	$	(131	)		100.0	%	$	1,719

In prior periods, we have presented a table showing bonds of individual issuers that have unrealized losses of $10 or greater. At June 30, 2003 we held no bonds that met this criteria.

The following table shows the length of time that individual debt securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.


				Gross			% of Gross
		Fair		Unrealized			Unrealized			Carrying
		Value		Losses			Losses			Value

More than 1 year		$	675	$	(88	)		67.2	%	$	688
6 months – 1 year			196		(16	)		12.2			201
Less than 6 months			826		(27	)		20.6			830

	Total	$	1,697	$	(131	)		100.0	%	$	1,719

As we described previously, we pay particular attention to those securities with unrealized losses that we have identified as potentially impaired and include them in our potentially distressed securities list. Of the $131 gross unrealized losses in the table above, approximately $28 was included in our potentially distressed securities list. The length of time that securities have continuously remained on our potentially distressed securities listing is summarized as follows:


				Gross			% of Gross
		Fair		Unrealized			Unrealized			Carrying
		Value		Losses			Losses			Value

More than 1 year		$	13	$	(6	)		21.4	%	$	14
6 months – 1 year			27		(9	)		32.2			27
Less than 6 months			25		(13	)		46.4			28

	Total	$	65	$	(28	)		100.0	%	$	69

Information about unrealized gains and losses is subject to rapidly changing conditions. Securities with unrealized gains and losses will fluctuate, as will those securities that we have identified as potentially distressed. We consider all of the factors discussed earlier when we determine if an unrealized loss is other than temporary, including our ability and intent to hold the security until the value recovers. Our current evaluation of other-than-temporary impairments reflects our positive intent to hold certain securities until maturity. However, we may subsequently decide to sell certain

of these securities in future periods within the overall context of our portfolio management strategies. If we make the decision to dispose of a security with an unrealized loss, we will write down the security to its fair value if we have not sold it by the end of the reporting period.

Realized Losses – Write Downs and Sales

Realized losses are comprised of both write downs on other-than-temporary impairments and actual sales of securities. For the quarter and the six months ended June 30, 2003, we had other-than-temporary impairments on bonds of $12 and $41 as compared to $40 and $53 for the same periods of 2002. We had no individual impairments in excess of $10 for the second quarter of 2003. Rather, all write downs resulting from other-than-temporary impairments ranged from $6 to less than $1.

For the second quarter and first six months of 2003, we incurred losses of $2 and $5 on actual sales of securities. All actual losses were individually less than $1. These disposals were in accordance with established portfolio management strategies and did not relate to securities that were other-than-temporarily impaired.

Mortgage Backed Securities

Mortgage backed securities (including Commercial Mortgage Backed Securities), all of which are included in debt securities available-for-sale, were as follows:


		June 30,		December 31,
		2003		2002

Federal agency issued mortgage backed securities		$	2,966	$	3,449
Corporate private-labeled mortgage backed securities			1,449		1,938

	Total	$	4,415	$	5,387

Our investment strategy with respect to our mortgage backed securities (MBS) portfolio focuses on actively traded issues with less volatile cash flows. The majority of the MBS holdings are sequential and planned amortization class tranches of federal agency issuers. The MBS portfolio has been constructed with underlying mortgage collateral characteristics and structure in order to mitigate cash flow volatility over a range of interest rates.

Because of the steep decline in interest rates to record lows, the mortgage market experienced record levels of refinancings in 2002, and the structural protection of our MBS portfolio eroded. During 2003, we continued to experience prepayments on our MBS portfolio. Our MBS portfolio is primarily a discount portfolio; therefore, prepayments accelerate the amortization of income. The excess accretion of discount as a result of these prepayments increased investment income in the second quarter and first six months of 2003 by $11.0 and $18.6 compared to $8.2 and $10.8 for the same periods of 2002, on a pre-tax basis. Further, these repayments are reinvested at yields that are lower than our current portfolio yields, producing less investment income going forward.

Mortgage Loans

We record mortgage loans on real property net of an allowance for credit losses. This allowance includes both reserve amounts for specific loans that are believed to be at a higher risk of becoming impaired in the near future, and a general reserve that is calculated by review of historical industry loan loss statistics. We consider future cash flows and the probability of payment when we

calculate our specific loan loss reserve. At June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, our allowance for mortgage loan credit losses was $36.

Derivative Instruments

Our guidelines permit use of derivative financial instruments such as futures contracts and interest rate swaps in conjunction with specific direct investments. Our actual use of derivatives through June 30, 2003 has been limited to managing well-defined interest rate risks. Interest rate swaps utilized in our asset/liability management strategy with a current notional value of $339 and $278 were open as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002. During 2002, we began using interest rate swaps to hedge future bond purchases that will back deposits on certain annuity contracts. This hedging strategy protects the spread between the annuity crediting rate offered at the time the annuities are sold and the income that will eventually be earned on bonds that will back annuity contracts issued. These interest rate contracts are generally terminated within a month. We also purchase S&P 500 Index® options in association with our current sales of equity indexed annuities. The reinsurance agreement on previously issued equity indexed annuities remains in existence.

Market Risk Exposure

We believe that the amounts shown in Form 10-K with respect to interest rates, changes in spreads over U.S. Treasuries on new investment opportunities, changes in the yield curve, and equity price risks continue to be representative. As of July 31, 2003, 10 year U.S. Treasury rates had increased 56 basis points since December 31, 2002. See further discussion in our Form 10-K regarding the impacts that a changing interest rate environment has on our financial position and earnings.

External Trends and Forward Looking Information

With respect to external trends, general economic conditions, interest rate risks, credit risks, environmental liabilities and the legal environment, see management’s comments in our Form 10-K.

Forward Looking Information

You should note that this document and our other SEC filings reflect information that we believe was accurate as of the date the respective materials were made publicly available. They do not reflect later developments.

As a matter of policy, we do not normally make projections or forecasts of future events or our performance. When we do, we rely on a safe harbor provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for statements that are not historical facts, called forward looking statements. These may include statements relating to our future actions, sales and product development efforts, expenses, the outcome of contingencies such as legal proceedings, or financial performance.

Certain information in our SEC filings and in any other written or oral statements made by us or on our behalf, involves forward looking statements. We have used appropriate care in developing this information, but any forward looking statements may turn out to be wrong. They can be affected by inaccurate assumptions or by known or unknown risks and uncertainties that could significantly affect our actual results. These risks and uncertainties include among others, general economic conditions (including the uncertainty as to the depth and duration of the current economic slowdown

and the rate at which the economy recovers), the impact on the economy from any further terrorist activities or any US military engagements, and interest rate levels, changes and fluctuations, all of which can impact our sales, investment portfolios, and earnings; competitive factors, including pricing pressures, technological developments, new product offerings and the emergence of new competitors; changes in federal and state taxes (including recent or future changes as to dividends, capital gains, retirement savings, and estate taxes); changes in the regulation of the financial services industry; or changes in other laws and regulations and their impact; and the various risks discussed earlier.

We undertake no obligation to publicly correct or update any forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our press releases and filings with the SEC. In particular, you should read the discussion in the section entitled “External Trends and Forward Looking Information,” and other sections it may reference, in our most recent 10-K report as it may be updated in our subsequent 10-Q and 8-K reports. This discussion covers certain risks, uncertainties and possibly inaccurate assumptions that could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical results. Other factors besides those listed there could also adversely affect our performance.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Information under the heading “Market Risk Exposures” in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Act) Rule 13a-15. Based on that evaluation, our management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that management, including our CEO and CFO, is alerted to material information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Act so as to allow timely decisions regarding our disclosures. In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, we recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do.

(b) There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation described in the above paragraph that occurred during the second quarter 2003 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

There have been no material developments in the proceedings described in Item 3 of Form 10-K, except for a settlement approved by the court on June 17, 2003 for a proposed class action suit alleging that policy illustrations were misleading to consumers. In agreeing to settle, the life company has denied any wrongdoing but believes that the settlement provides benefits to the policyholder class and to the life company by resolving and eliminating the need for corporate resources to be spent on a lawsuit that has been pending for seven years. There are no new material proceedings to report here.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The following information relates to the registrant’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 5, 2003.

(a) Election of Directors:


Class I	Term	Votes For		Withheld

Edwin B. Borden	Two Years		122,416,282		1,692,736
E.S. Melvin	Two Years		121,940,364		2,168,654


Class II	Term	Votes For		Withheld

William H. Cunningham	Three Years		121,965,363		2,143,655
Elizabeth Valk Long	Three Years		121,102,969		3,006,049
Donald S. Russell, Jr.	Three Years		121,148,631		2,960,387

(b) Approval of certain material terms of the annual incentive program:


Votes For	Votes Against		Abstain

115,978,060		6,298,241		1,832,714

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits. See Exhibit Index on page 45.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K since the first quarter 2003

1. April 29, 2003 - a Form 8-K furnished under items 7 and 9 (for item 12) the press release reporting financial results for the first quarter of 2003.

2. June 17, 2003 - a Form 8-K furnished under item 5 (for item 11) a notice of a covered 401(k) plan blackout period that was given to our directors and executive officers.

3. July 29, 2003 - a Form 8-K furnished under items 7 and 9 (for item 12) the press release reporting financial results for the second quarter of 2003.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

JEFFERSON-PILOT CORPORATION

By (Signature) /s/Theresa M. Stone
(Name and Title) Theresa M. Stone, Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Date August 13, 2003

By (Signature) /s/Reggie D. Adamson
(Name and Title) Reggie D. Adamson, Senior Vice President - Finance
Principal Accounting Officer
Date August 13, 2003

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit
Number		Description

31(i)		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31(ii)		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	•		current fair value of the security compared to amortized cost

	•		length of time the fair value was below amortized cost

	•		industry factors or conditions related to a geographic area that are negatively affecting the security

	•		downgrades by a rating agency

	•		past due interest or principal payments or other violation of covenants

	•		deterioration of the overall financial condition of the specific issuer

	•		fundamental analysis of the liquidity and financial condition of the specific issuer

	•		underlying valuation of assets specifically pledged to support the credit

	•		time period in which the fair value has been significantly below amortized cost

	•		industry sector or geographic area applicable to the specific issuer

	•		our ability and intent to retain the investment for a sufficient time to recover its value

(a)		We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Act) Rule 13a-15. Based on that evaluation, our management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that management, including our CEO and CFO, is alerted to material information required to be disclosed in our filings under the Act so as to allow timely decisions regarding our disclosures. In designing and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures, we recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do.

(b)		There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation described in the above paragraph that occurred during the second quarter 2003 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

(a)		Exhibits. See Exhibit Index on page 45.

(b)		Reports on Form 8-K since the first quarter 2003

		1. April 29, 2003 - a Form 8-K furnished under items 7 and 9 (for item 12) the press release reporting financial results for the first quarter of 2003.

		2. June 17, 2003 - a Form 8-K furnished under item 5 (for item 11) a notice of a covered 401(k) plan blackout period that was given to our directors and executive officers.

		3. July 29, 2003 - a Form 8-K furnished under items 7 and 9 (for item 12) the press release reporting financial results for the second quarter of 2003.

		JEFFERSON-PILOT CORPORATION

		By (Signature) /s/Theresa M. Stone (Name and Title) Theresa M. Stone, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer Date August 13, 2003

		By (Signature) /s/Reggie D. Adamson (Name and Title) Reggie D. Adamson, Senior Vice President - Finance Principal Accounting Officer Date August 13, 2003