Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003

OR

For the transition period from ______________________________to ______________________________

Commission File Number   0-23948

Boyd Bros. Transportation Inc.

(334) 775-1400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) Yes [X] No [   ], and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [   ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes [   ]  No [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of August 12, 2003.

Table of Contents

INDEX

2

Table of Contents

BOYD BROS. TRANSPORTATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

BOYD BROS. TRANSPORTATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

BOYD BROS. TRANSPORTATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

BOYD BROS. TRANSPORTATION INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

BOYD BROS. TRANSPORTATION INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.     Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in compliance with Form 10-Q instructions and, thus, do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the statements reflect all adjustments, including those of normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly the results of the reported interim periods. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The statements should be read in conjunction with the summary of accounting policies and notes to financial statements included in the Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K.

2.     Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Boyd Bros. Transportation Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, WTI Transport, Inc. (“WTI”). The Boyd division (“Boyd”) also operates a logistics division (“Logistics”) that provides logistical support to the Company, and brokers freight by identifying external shipping needs and matching available carrier resources to those needs. Boyd, Logistics, and WTI are referred to herein collectively as the “Company”. All significant intercompany balances, transactions and stockholdings have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior periods to conform to the current period presented.

3.     Environmental Matters

The Company’s operations are subject to certain federal, state, and local laws and regulations concerning the environment. Certain of the Company’s facilities are located in historically industrial areas, and, therefore, there is the possibility of environmental liability as a result of operations by prior owners, as well as the Company’s use of fuels and underground storage tanks at its regional service centers.

4.     Stockholders’ Equity

Earnings Per Share

The following is a reconciliation from basic earnings per share to diluted earnings per share for each of the periods presented:

7

Table of Contents

Stock Options

The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS” or “Statement”) No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure”, which amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation, which was originally provided under SFAS No. 123. The Statement also improves the timeliness of disclosures by requiring the information be included in interim, as well as annual, financial statements. The adoption of these disclosure provisions did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

The Company has a stock option plan (the “Plan”) that provides for the granting of stock options to key employees, executive officers and directors. An aggregate of 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock are reserved for this Plan. The options are exercisable in increments over a five-year period beginning on the first anniversary of the grant and will expire ten years after the date of the grant. No options were exercised in 2003 or 2002.

SFAS No. 123 encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. The Company has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related Interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Company’s stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. The option price of all the Company’s stock options is equal to the market value of the stock at the grant date. As such, no compensation expense is recorded in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Had compensation cost been determined based upon the fair value at the grant date for awards under the Plan consistent with the methodology prescribed under SFAS No. 123, the Company’s pro forma net income and net income per share would have differed from the amounts reported as follows:

8

Table of Contents

5.     Related Party Transactions

The Company entered into a consulting agreement with its Chairman Emeritus, Dempsey Boyd, effective January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2003. Mr. Boyd will be paid $145,000 annually under this consulting agreement. Mr. Boyd provides advice and expertise, and performs such duties and services from time to time, during the term of the agreement, as the Company shall reasonably request. The services provided include, without limitation, negotiating equipment and tire agreements, reviewing equipment requirements, researching and investigating equipment, advising the Company regarding certain ongoing litigation matters, and providing the Company with an experienced perspective on the trucking industry.

The Company entered into a lease agreement with Dempsey Boyd, effective September 1, 2002 through August 31, 2003, to lease an aircraft for Company use. The Company pays a monthly lease amount of $20,000 with an allowance of twenty hours of flight time per month. For any flight hours that exceed twenty per month, the Company pays an additional $1,000 per flight hour. On May 1, 2003, the Board of Directors approved a $100 per flight hour increase for flights on or after May 1, 2003. The Company has paid a total of $124,000 in lease payments to Mr. Boyd for the first half of 2003.

6.     Goodwill

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations,” and SFAS No.142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 141 requires the use of the purchase method of accounting and prohibits the use of the pooling-of-interests method of accounting for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001. SFAS No.142 requires, among other things, that companies no longer amortize goodwill, but instead test goodwill for impairment at least annually.

The Company adopted SFAS Nos. 141 and 142 on January 1, 2002 and, accordingly, ceased amortization of goodwill at that time. As of June 30, 2002, the Company completed the first phase of transitional testing for the potential impairment of goodwill relating to its WTI subsidiary. As a result of such testing, the Company determined there was no impairment. No events have occurred since the assessment date to cause a significant change in the values used for computation.

7.     Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure”. SFAS No. 148 amends Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”), to provide alternative methods for voluntary transition to SFAS No. 123’s fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation (“the fair value method”). SFAS No. 148 also requires disclosure of the effects of an entity’s accounting policy with respect to stock-based employee compensation on reported net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share in annual and interim financial statements. The transition provisions of SFAS No. 148 are effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company expects that the transition provisions of SFAS No. 148 will not have a material adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations upon adoption since the Company has not adopted the fair value method. The Company adopted the required disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, herein.

In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”), “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees and Indebtedness of Others.” FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures to be made by the guarantor in its interim and annual financial statements about its obligations under certain guarantees that it has issued. It also requires that a guarantor recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of this interpretation are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002, while the provisions of the disclosure requirements are effective for financial statements of interim or annual reports ending after December 15, 2002. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of FIN 45 during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002 and such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company did not issue or modify any guarantees during the first half of 2003.

9

Table of Contents

In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”), “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.” In general, a variable interest entity is a corporation, partnership, trust, or any other legal structure used for business purposes that either (a) does not have equity investors with voting rights or (b) has equity investors that do not provide sufficient financial resources for the entity to support its activities. FIN 46 requires certain variable interest entities to be consolidated by the primary beneficiary of the entity if the investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The consolidation requirements of FIN 46 apply immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003. The consolidation requirements apply to older entities in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. Certain of the disclosure requirements apply in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the variable interest entity was established. The Company currently has identified no variable interest entities, thus the adoption of the provisions of FIN 46 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.

In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, “Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS No. 149”). SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments and improves financial reporting by requiring that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly. The amendments to SFAS No. 133 fall principally into three categories: amendments related to SFAS No. 133 implementation issues that were previously cleared by the FASB, amendments clarifying the definition of a derivative, and amendments relating to the definition of expected cash flows in FASB Concepts Statement No. 7, “Using Cash Flow Information and Present Value in Accounting Measurements.” SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. The implementation of SFAS No. 149 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements, as the Company does not currently use any derivative type instruments.

In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity” (“SFAS No. 150”). SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances). Many of those instruments previously were classified in financial statements as equity. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 150 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

There were no other recently issued accounting pronouncements with delayed effective dates that would currently have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

8.     Segment Information

The Company has three reportable segments: the Boyd division (“Boyd”), the Logistics division (“Logistics”), and the WTI division (“WTI”). Boyd is a flatbed carrier that hauls primarily steel and building products throughout most of the continental United States, and operated an average of 687 trucks during the first six months of 2003. Boyd averaged 511 company drivers and 176 owner-operators during the first six months of 2003. Logistics brokers freight by identifying external shipping needs and matching available external carrier resources to those needs. This division requires minimal overhead and capital resources and provides a service through logistically coordinating needs for carriers to available carriers and scheduling the service to be provided. All carriers brokered through Logistics are responsible for maintaining proper insurance coverage and are required to provide proof of such coverage prior to brokerage of a load. WTI is a flatbed carrier that hauls steel and roofing products, primarily in the eastern two-thirds of the United States, and operated an average of 214 trucks during the first six months of 2003. WTI averaged 34 company drivers and 180 owner-operators during the first six months of 2003. Due to the significant growth of Logistics, and the operating characteristics that differentiate it from the Boyd and WTI divisions, management now views Logistics as a separate reportable segment. Unaudited segment reporting information for the periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:

10

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

     Three Months Ended June 30, 2003

     Three Months Ended June 30, 2002

     Six Months Ended June 30, 2003

     Six Months Ended June 30, 2002

Identifiable Assets

     As of June 30, 2003

     As of December 31, 2002

11

Table of Contents

9.     Subsequent Event

The Company was involved in an accident on July 5, 2003, which resulted in one fatality and injuries to three other third parties. No lawsuit has been filed to date with respect to this accident; however, attorneys have been retained by those involved. The Company’s self-insured amount for this accident is $750,000, with the Company also responsible for its shared amount of 33% up to the $2 million insurance coverage and all amounts in excess of the insured amount. This accident has the potential to cause the Company to reach its total per occurrence retention amount for insurance purposes. If the Company is ultimately found to have some liability for this accident, the Company believes that its operating cash flows and, if needed, additional bank financing would be sufficient to cover any amounts payable. However, there can be no assurance that the Company’s operations and financial condition would not be adversely affected if the Company is found to have liability.

12

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the attached interim consolidated financial statements and with the Company’s 2002 Annual Report to Stockholders, which included audited financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as well as Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

The Company, headquartered in Clayton, Alabama, is a flatbed truckload carrier that has three reportable segments: Boyd, Logistics, and WTI. Boyd operates throughout most of the continental United States, hauling primarily steel and building products. Logistics provides logistical support to the Company and brokers freight by identifying external shipping needs and matching available external carrier resources to those needs. WTI hauls steel and roofing products, primarily in the eastern two-thirds of the United States. The Company typically serves high-volume, time-sensitive shippers that demand time definite delivery.

Historically, the Company has owned its revenue equipment and operated through employee-operators. The Company’s expansion in the past, therefore, required significant capital expenditures that have been funded through secured borrowings. In the last six years, the Company began adding owner-operators to its fleet as a strategy to expand its potential for growth without the concomitant increase in capital expenditures typically related to owned equipment. The Company accelerated the implementation of this strategy in December 1997 with the acquisition of WTI, which specializes in short-haul routes using a largely owner-operator fleet.

The Company continues to focus on marketing efforts and is broadening its customer base outside of the steel and building products industries, as well as stressing best-in-business service to its customers. The Company remains committed to its emphasis on safety while working to reduce insurance claims and costs. See “Factors That May Affect Future Results”, below.

Critical Accounting Policies

The methods, estimates and judgments the Company’s management uses in applying accounting policies may have a significant effect on the results the Company reports in its financial statements. The estimates and judgments in applying those accounting policies which may have the most significant effect on the Company’s financial statements and operating results include: estimates of useful lives and salvage values for the depreciation of tractors and trailers; estimates of accrued liabilities for insurance claims for liability and both physical and property damage and workers’ compensation; allowance for doubtful accounts for tractors leased to owner-operators; determinations of impairment of long-lived assets; allowance for doubtful accounts receivable; and evaluation of impairment of goodwill. Please refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition – Critical Accounting Policies” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, for a more complete description of the Company’s critical accounting policies.

Quarterly Review:

The following tables set forth, by segment, the percentage relationship of expense items to operating revenues and certain other operating statistics for the periods indicated:

13

Table of Contents