Back to GetFilings.com
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003
Commission File Number: 0-28732
SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
State of Incorporation: Delaware I.R.S. Employer I.D.: 65-0966399
Address and Telephone Number:
2200 Eller Drive
P.O. Box 13038
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33316
(954) 523-2200
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past ninety days. YES [X] NO [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES [ ] NO [X]
THERE WERE 23,317,735 SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, PAR VALUE $0.01 PER SHARE,
OUTSTANDING AT MAY 1, 2003.
SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
INDEX
PAGE
----
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)................................................1
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002.....................1
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended
March 31, 2003 and 2002...........................................................................2
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended
March 31, 2003 and 2002...........................................................................3
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements..............................................4
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.................10
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures of Market Risk...............................................20
Item 4. Controls and Procedures ..............................................................................21
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.....................................................................................22
Item 2. Changes in Securities ................................................................................22
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.......................................................................22
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders...................................................22
Item 5. Other Information.....................................................................................22
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K......................................................................22
Signature......................................................................................................23
Certifications.................................................................................................24
As used in this Report, the term "Parent" means Seabulk International, Inc., and
the term "Company" means the Parent and/or one or more of its consolidated
subsidiaries.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PAR VALUE DATA)
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,
2003 2002
--------- ------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents ....................................................... $ 39,244 $ 37,188
Restricted cash ................................................................. 1,337 1,337
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4,924
and $5,243 in 2003 and 2002, respectively ..................................... 40,424 45,987
Other receivables ............................................................... 14,073 13,485
Marine operating supplies ....................................................... 8,176 8,139
Prepaid expenses and other ...................................................... 2,426 2,702
--------- ---------
Total current assets .......................................................... 105,680 108,838
Vessels and equipment, net ......................................................... 551,751 545,169
Deferred costs, net ................................................................ 35,162 38,228
Other .............................................................................. 7,085 10,860
--------- ---------
Total assets .................................................................. $ 699,678 $ 703,095
========= =========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable ................................................................ $ 8,862 $ 11,343
Current maturities of long-term debt ............................................ 24,345 24,315
Current obligations under capital leases ........................................ 3,023 3,005
Accrued interest ................................................................ 5,805 1,733
Accrued liabilities and other ................................................... 42,614 42,181
--------- ---------
Total current liabilities ..................................................... 84,649 82,577
Long-term debt ..................................................................... 404,511 410,858
Obligations under capital leases ................................................... 28,006 28,748
Other liabilities .................................................................. 3,463 3,489
--------- ---------
Total liabilities ............................................................. 520,629 525,672
Commitments and contingencies
Minority interest .................................................................. 651 623
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, no par value--authorized 5,000; none issued and outstanding .... -- --
Common stock-$.01 par value, authorized 40,000 shares; 23,239 and
23,124 shares issued and outstanding in 2003 and 2002, respectively ............. 232 231
Additional paid-in capital ...................................................... 258,827 258,016
Unearned compensation ........................................................... (899) (99)
Accumulated deficit ............................................................. (79,762) (81,348)
--------- ---------
Total stockholders' equity .................................................... 178,398 176,800
--------- ---------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity .................................. $ 699,678 $ 703,095
========= =========
See accompanying notes.
1
SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
-----------------------------
2003 2002
-------- --------
Revenue ..................................................... $ 77,229 $ 83,199
Operating expenses:
Crew payroll and benefits ................................ 21,380 22,776
Charter hire ............................................. 1,726 1,797
Repairs and maintenance .................................. 5,733 6,764
Insurance ................................................ 2,204 2,773
Fuel and consumables ..................................... 6,139 7,329
Port charges and other ................................... 4,190 4,302
-------- --------
Total operating expenses ............................... 41,372 45,741
Overhead expenses:
Salaries and benefits .................................... 5,867 5,827
Office ................................................... 1,219 1,284
Professional fees ........................................ 910 585
Other .................................................... 1,334 1,236
-------- --------
Total overhead expenses ................................ 9,330 8,932
Depreciation, amortization and drydocking ................... 16,494 16,558
-------- --------
Income from operations ...................................... 10,033 11,968
Other (expense) income:
Interest expense ......................................... (8,063) (12,713)
Interest income .......................................... 86 62
Minority interest in (gains) losses of subsidiaries ...... (28) 99
Gain (loss) on disposal of assets ........................ 797 (128)
Other .................................................... 23 93
-------- --------
Total other expense, net ............................... (7,185) (12,587)
-------- --------
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes ............. 2,848 (619)
Provision for income taxes .................................. 1,262 1,667
-------- --------
Net income (loss) ...................................... $ 1,586 $ (2,286)
======== ========
Net income (loss) per common share:
Net income (loss) per common share - basic ............. $ 0.07 $ (0.22)
======== ========
Net income (loss) per common share - diluted ........... $ 0.07 $ (0.22)
======== ========
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic ..... 23,102 10,461
======== ========
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted ... 23,435 10,461
======== ========
See accompanying notes.
2
SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2003 2002
-------- --------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss) ............................................................... $ 1,586 $ (2,286)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization of vessels and equipment ..................... 10,795 11,231
Amortization of drydocking costs ........................................... 5,699 5,327
(Recovery of) provision for bad debts ...................................... (255) 307
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets .......................................... (797) 128
Amortization of discount on long-term debt and financing costs ............. 373 1,352
Minority interest in gains (losses) of subsidiaries ........................ 28 (99)
Senior and notes payable issued for payment of accrued interest and fees ... -- 375
Other non-cash items ....................................................... 39 218
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts and other receivables ......................................... 4,872 5,787
Other current and long-term assets ..................................... 3,338 2,823
Accounts payable and other liabilities ................................. 1,999 4,603
-------- --------
Net cash provided by operating activities ............................ 27,677 29,766
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Expenditures for drydocking ..................................................... (2,964) (5,615)
Proceeds from disposals of assets ............................................... 2,343 5,104
Purchases of vessels and equipment .............................................. (17,871) (1,306)
-------- --------
Net cash used in investing activities ........................................ (18,492) (1,817)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net payments of revolving credit facility ....................................... -- (6,700)
Payments of New Credit Facility ................................................. (5,000) --
Payments of long-term debt ...................................................... (867) (7,548)
Payments of Title XI bonds ...................................................... (450) (450)
Payments of deferred financing costs for New Credit Facility .................... (88) --
Payments of obligations under capital leases .................................... (724) (823)
-------- --------
Net cash used in financing activities ........................................ (7,129) (15,521)
-------- --------
Change in cash and cash equivalents ............................................. 2,056 12,428
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period ................................ 37,188 11,631
-------- --------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD ...................................... $ 39,244 $ 24,059
======== ========
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Senior and notes payable issued for payment of accrued interest and fees ........ $ -- $ 375
======== ========
Vessels exchanged for drydock expenditures ...................................... $ -- $ 900
======== ========
Reactivation of two vessels that were classified as assets held for sale ........ $ -- $ 1,682
======== ========
See accompanying notes.
3
SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31, 2003
(UNAUDITED)
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America for interim financial information and with
Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America for complete financial statements. All
adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are considered necessary for a
fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods shown are of a
normal recurring nature and have been reflected in the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements. The results of operations for the periods
presented are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full
fiscal year or for any future period. The information included in these
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations contained in this report and the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes included in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. Except net income (loss),
the Company has no material components of comprehensive income (loss).
Certain financial statement reclassifications have been made to conform
prior periods' data to the 2003 financial statement presentation.
2. VESSEL PURCHASES
In January 2003, the Company took delivery of the Seabulk Africa, a
newbuild, state-of-the art, 236-foot, 5,500 horsepower UT-755L platform supply
vessel. The vessel has joined the Company's West African fleet. The Seabulk
Africa and related improvements were acquired for cash of approximately $17.8
million and financed in April 2003 by means of a sale leaseback arrangement with
TransAmerica Capital for a lease term of 10 years, after which the Company will
have an option to acquire the vessel.
In February 2003, the Company finalized an agreement to purchase a
Brazilian flag offshore line handling vessel built in 2002 for delivery by July
2003. The purchase price is $2.6 million and, upon delivery, will enter the
Brazilian offshore market.
In April 2003, the Company terminated a capital lease with TA Marine
Inc. for the Seabulk Arizona and acquired the vessel for $6.9 million. The
Seabulk Arizona is a 1998 built, 186-foot, 4,200 horsepower supply vessel.
Financing was in the form of a 5-year, $6.5 million term loan provided by Orix
Financial Services, Inc.
In April 2003, the Company finalized an agreement with a Brazilian
shipyard to build a state-of-the-art, 236-foot, 5,460 horsepower UT-755L
platform supply vessel for delivery in the Fall of 2004, with an option for a
second sister ship. The vessel has a purchase price of $16.7 million and, upon
delivery, will enter the Brazilian offshore market.
4
3. JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENTS
In March 2003, the Company formed a joint venture company in Nigeria,
named Modant Seabulk Nigeria Limited, with CTC International, Inc., a company
owned by Nigerian interests. The Company has a 40% interest in Modant Seabulk
Nigeria Limited. The Company also sold five of its crewboats operating in
Nigeria to joint venture companies related to CTC International in April 2003.
As a part of the proceeds of sale, the Company acquired a 20% interest in these
joint venture companies. Modant Seabulk Nigeria Limited will operate crewboats
in Nigeria. Seabulk Offshore will provide certain management services for the
joint venture.
4. INCOME TAXES
For the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, a gross deferred
tax benefit was computed using an estimated annual effective tax rate of 35%.
Management has recorded a valuation allowance at March 31, 2003 and 2002 to
reduce the net deferred tax assets to an amount that will more likely than not
be realized. After application of the valuation allowance, the net deferred tax
assets are zero. The current provision for income taxes for the three-month
periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 represents taxes withheld on foreign
source revenue.
5. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net
income (loss) per share for the periods indicated:
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
---------------------------
2003 2002
------- --------
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR PER SHARE
DATA)
Numerator for basic and diluted net income (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders ............. $ 1,586 $ (2,286)
======= ========
Denominator for basic net income per share-weighted
average shares .............................................. 23,102 10,461
Effects of dilutive securities:
Stock options .................................................. 123 --
Warrants ....................................................... 210 --
------- --------
Dilutive potential common shares ............................... 333 --
------- --------
Denominator for diluted net income per share-adjusted
weighted average shares and assumed conversions ............. 23,435 10,461
======= ========
Net income (loss) per share - basic ............................ $ 0.07 $ (0.22)
======= ========
Net income (loss) per share - diluted .......................... $ 0.07 $ (0.22)
======= ========
The weighted average diluted common shares outstanding for the three
months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002 excludes 746,000 and 818,000, respectively.
Additionally, 250,000 and 572,000 warrants are excluded from the weighted
average diluted common shares outstanding for the three months ended March 31,
2003 and 2002, respectively. These common stock equivalents are excluded because
they are antidilutive.
5
6. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company organizes its business principally into three segments. The
Company does not have significant intersegment transactions. These segments and
their respective operations are as follows:
Offshore Energy Support (Seabulk Offshore) - Offshore energy
support includes vessels operating in U.S. and foreign
locations used primarily to transport materials, supplies,
equipment and personnel to drilling rigs and to support the
construction, positioning and ongoing operations of oil and
gas production platforms.
Marine Transportation Services (Seabulk Tankers) - Marine
transportation services includes oceangoing vessels used to
transport chemicals, fuel and other petroleum products,
primarily from chemical manufacturing plants, refineries and
storage facilities along the U.S. Gulf of Mexico coast to
industrial users and distribution facilities in and around
the Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic and Pacific coast ports. Certain
of the vessels also transport crude oil within Alaska and
among Alaska, the Pacific coast and Hawaiian ports.
Towing (Seabulk Towing) - Harbor and offshore towing services
are provided by tugs to vessels utilizing the ports in which
the tugs operate, and to vessels at sea to the extent
required by offshore commercial contract opportunities and by
environmental regulations, casualty or other emergency.
The Company evaluates performance by operating segment. Also, within
the offshore energy support segment, the Company performs additional performance
evaluations of vessels marketed in U.S. and foreign locations. Resources are
allocated based on segment profit or loss from operations, before interest and
taxes.
Revenue by segment and geographic area consists only of services
provided to external customers, as reported in the Statements of Operations.
Income from operations by geographic area represents net revenue less applicable
costs and expenses related to that revenue. Unallocated expenses are primarily
comprised of general and administrative expenses of a corporate nature.
6
The following schedules present segment and geographic information
about the Company's operations (in thousands):
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
-----------------------------
2003 2002
-------- --------
REVENUE
Offshore energy support ................... $ 37,838 $ 43,312
Marine transportation services ............ 30,177 31,924
Towing .................................... 9,289 8,060
Eliminations (1) .......................... (75) (97)
-------- --------
TOTAL .................................. $ 77,229 $ 83,199
======== ========
OPERATING EXPENSES
Offshore energy support ................... $ 23,202 $ 23,589
Marine transportation services ............ 13,657 17,767
Towing .................................... 4,588 4,471
Corporate ................................. -- 11
Eliminations (1) .......................... (75) (97)
-------- --------
TOTAL .................................. $ 41,372 $ 45,741
======== ========
DEPRECIATION, AMORTIZATION AND DRYDOCKING
Offshore energy support ................... $ 10,689 $ 10,503
Marine transportation services ............ 4,554 4,548
Towing .................................... 826 760
General corporate ......................... 425 747
-------- --------
TOTAL .................................. $ 16,494 $ 16,558
======== ========
INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS
Offshore energy support ................... $ (762) $ 5,111
Marine transportation services ............ 11,083 8,157
Towing .................................... 2,653 1,686
General corporate ......................... (2,941) (2,986)
-------- --------
TOTAL .................................. $ 10,033 $ 11,968
======== ========
NET INCOME (LOSS)
Offshore energy support ................... $ (4,104) $ (2,471)
Marine transportation services ............ 6,671 2,588
Towing .................................... 1,965 383
General Corporate ......................... (2,946) (2,786)
-------- --------
TOTAL .................................. $ 1,586 $ (2,286)
======== ========
GEOGRAPHIC REVENUE
Domestic .................................. $ 48,227 $ 53,571
Foreign
West Africa ............................ 19,964 20,416
Middle East ............................ 5,477 6,058
Southeast Asia ......................... 3,561 3,154
-------- --------
CONSOLIDATED GEOGRAPHIC REVENUE ............. $ 77,229 $ 83,199
======== ========
(1) Eliminations of intersegment towing revenue and intersegment marine
transportation operating expense.
7
7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Under United States law, "United States persons" are prohibited from
business activities and contracts in certain countries, including Sudan and
Iran. The Company has filed three reports with and submitted documents to the
Office of Foreign Asset Control ("OFAC") of the U.S. Department of Treasury. One
of the reports was also filed with the Bureau of Export Administration of the
U.S. Department of Commerce. The reports and documents related to certain
limited charters with third parties involving three of the Company's vessels
which called in the Sudan for several months in 1999 and January 2000, and
charters with third parties involving several of the Company's vessels which
called in Iran in 1998. In March 2003, the Company received notification from
OFAC that the case has been referred to its Civil Penalties Division. Should
OFAC determine that these activities constituted violations of the laws or
regulations, civil penalties, including fines, could be assessed against the
Company and/or certain individuals who knowingly participated in such
activities. The Company cannot predict the extent of such penalties; however,
management does not believe the outcome of these matters will have a material
impact on its financial position or results of operations.
The Company was sued by Maritime Transportation Development Corporation
in January 2002 in Florida state court in Broward County alleging broker
commissions due since 1998 from charters on two of its vessels, the Seabulk
Magnachem and Seabulk Challenger, under an alleged broker commission agreement.
The claim allegedly continues to accrue. The amount alleged to be due is over
$500,000, but is subject to offset claims and defenses by the Company. The
Company is vigorously defending such charges and believes that it has good
defenses, but the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome.
Under the Company's mutual protection and indemnity marine insurance
policy, the Company could be liable for additional premiums to cover investment
losses and reserve shortfalls experienced by its marine insurance club
(Steamship). The maximum potential amount of additional premiums that can be
assessed by Steamship is substantial. However, additional premiums can only be
assessed for open policy years. Steamship usually closes a policy year
approximately three years after the policy year has ended. As of May 1, 2003,
completed policy years 2000 - 2002 are still open, but there have been no
additional premiums assessed for these policy years. The Company will record a
liability for any such additional premiums in the period that they are assessed
and the amount can be reasonably estimated.
From time to time, the Company is also party to personal injury and
property damage claims litigation arising in the ordinary course of our
business. The Company has significant deductibles and self-insured retentions
which will cover Protection and Indemnity marine insurance claims. Claim costs
in excess of these significant deductibles and self-insured retentions will be
covered by Protection and Indemnity mutual insurance.
8. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
As permitted by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
("SFAS 123"), the Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees ("APB 25") and related
interpretations in accounting for its employee stock-based transactions and has
complied with the disclosure requirements of SFAS 123. Under APB 25,
compensation expense is calculated at the time of option grant based upon the
difference between the exercise prices of the option and the fair market value
of the Company's common stock at the date of grant recognized over the vesting
period.
8
On December 31, 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS
123 to provide alternative methods of transition to the fair value method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this statement
amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS 123 to require expanded disclosure of
the effects of an entity's accounting policy with respect to stock-based
employee compensation on reported net income and earnings per share in annual
and interim financial statements.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to determine
the fair value of options granted under the Company's stock option plans. Had
compensation expense for the stock option grants been determined based on the
fair value at the grant date for awards consistent with the methods of SFAS No.
123, the Company's net income (loss) would have changed the pro forma amounts
presented below:
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
--------------------------------
2003 2002
---------- ----------
Net income (loss), as reported ............................................ $ 1,586 $ (2,286)
Stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair value method ... $ (171) $ (238)
---------- ----------
Pro forma net income (loss) ............................................... $ 1,415 $ (2,524)
========== ==========
Net income (loss) per common share:
Basic-as reported ................................................ $ 0.07 $ (0.22)
========== ==========
Basic-pro forma .................................................. $ 0.06 $ (0.24)
========== ==========
Diluted-as reported .............................................. $ 0.07 $ (0.22)
========== ==========
Diluted-pro forma ................................................ $ 0.06 $ (0.24)
========== ==========
9. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45"),
Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN 45 expands on the accounting
guidance of Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and incorporates without change the
provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 34, which is being superseded. FIN 45
elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for most guarantees,
including loan guarantees such as standby letters of credit. It also clarifies
that at the time a company issues a guarantee, it must recognize an initial
liability for the fair value, or market value, of the obligations it assumes
under that guarantee and must disclose that information in its interim and
annual financial statements. The initial recognition and initial measurement
provisions apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after
December 31, 2002, regardless of the guarantor's fiscal year-end. The disclosure
requirements in the Interpretation are effective for financial statements of
interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45
is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB
Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 14, and Technical
Corrections, which eliminates the requirement that gains and losses from the
extinguishment of debt be aggregated and, if material, classified as an
extraordinary item, net of the related income tax effect, and eliminates an
inconsistency between the accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and certain
lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to
sale-leaseback transactions. Subsequent to the January 1, 2003 adoption date of
the
9
standard, the Company will be required to reclassify to continuing operations
amounts previously reported as extinguishments of debt.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which addresses the financial
accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities.
SFAS No. 146 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2002.
The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the
Company.
In June 2001, the Accounting Executive Committee of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued an exposure draft of a proposed
Statement of Position ("SOP") entitled Accounting for Certain Costs and
Activities Related to Property, Plant and Equipment. Under the proposed SOP, the
Company would expense major maintenance costs as incurred and prohibit the use
of the deferral of the entire cost of a planned major maintenance activity.
Currently, the costs incurred to drydock the Company's vessels are deferred and
amortized on a straight-line basis over the period to the next drydocking,
generally 30 to 36 months. Management has determined that this SOP, if issued as
proposed, would have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
In the year of adoption, the Company would write-off the net book value of the
deferred drydocking costs and record the write-off as a change in accounting
principle ($24.4 million as of March 31, 2003). Additionally, all drydock
expenditures incurred after the adoption of the SOP would be expensed as
incurred.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") should be read in conjunction with
the condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto
included elsewhere in this Report and the 2002 Form 10-K.
The MD&A contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than
statements of historical fact included in the MD&A are forward-looking
statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations and beliefs
reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no
assurance that they will prove correct. For information regarding the risks and
uncertainties that could cause such forward-looking statements to prove
incorrect, see "Projections and Other Forward-Looking Information" in Item 1 of
the 2002 Form 10-K.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
For general information concerning critical accounting policies as well
as estimates, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates" in the
2002 Form 10-K.
In June 2001, the Accounting Executive Committee of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued an exposure draft of a proposed
Statement of Position ("SOP") entitled Accounting for Certain Costs and
Activities Related to Property, Plant and Equipment. Under the proposed SOP, the
Company would expense major maintenance costs as incurred and prohibit the use
of the deferral of the entire cost of a planned major maintenance activity.
Currently, the costs incurred to drydock the vessels are deferred and amortized
on a straight-line basis over the period to the next drydocking, generally 30 to
36 months. Management has determined that this SOP, if issued as proposed, would
have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. In the year of
adoption, the Company would write off the net book value of the deferred
drydocking costs and record the write-off as a change in accounting principle
10
($24.4 million as of March 31, 2003). Additionally, all drydock expenditures
incurred after the adoption of the SOP would be expensed as incurred.
REVENUE OVERVIEW
The Company derives its revenue from three main lines of business -
Seabulk Offshore, Seabulk Tankers, and Seabulk Towing. Seabulk Offshore, the
Company's domestic and international offshore energy support business, accounted
for approximately 49% and 52% of Company revenue for the three months ended
March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Marine transportation, under the name
Seabulk Tankers, consists of the Company's Jones Act tanker business, in which
it operates ten petroleum and chemical product carriers in the domestic
coastwise trade, and accounted for approximately 39% and 38% of Company revenue
for the three months ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Seabulk
Towing, the Company's domestic harbor and offshore towing business, accounted
for approximately 12% and 10% of Company revenue for the three months ended
March 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
SEABULK OFFSHORE
Revenue from the Company's offshore energy support operations is
primarily a function of the size of the Company's fleet, vessel day rates or
charter rates, and fleet utilization. Rates and utilization are primarily a
function of offshore exploration, development, and production activities, which
are in turn heavily dependent upon the price of crude oil and natural gas.
Further, in certain areas where the Company conducts offshore energy support
operations (particularly the U.S. Gulf of Mexico), contracts for the utilization
of offshore energy support vessels commonly include termination provisions with
three to five-day notice requirements and no termination penalty. As a result,
companies engaged in offshore energy support operations (including the Company)
are particularly sensitive to changes in market demand.
As the Company's offshore energy support fleet gets older, the
Company's strategy is to look for opportunities to upgrade its offshore fleet to
higher-value, newer vessels and to reduce the number of older and smaller
crewboats in its fleet. The Company sold six offshore energy support vessels
during the first quarter of 2003 for an aggregate total of $2.0 million and a
gain of approximately $800,000. The Company sold 17 offshore energy support
vessels during 2002 for an aggregate total of $6.8 million and a gain of
approximately $55,000.
Periods for collection of receivables in certain foreign areas of
operation in the offshore business tend to be longer than is usual for the
United States. The Company regularly monitors all such receivables accounts and
believes that it has accrued adequate reserves where necessary.
11
The following tables set forth, by primary area of operation, average
day rates achieved by the offshore energy fleet owned or operated by the Company
and average utilization for the periods indicated. Average day rates are
calculated by dividing total revenue by the number of days worked. Utilization
percentages are based upon the number of working days over a 365/366-day year
and the number of vessels in the fleet on the last day of the quarter.
Q1 2003
AHTS/ AHT/ Crew/
Supply Tugs Utility Other
------ ------ ------ ------
DOMESTIC(1)
Vessels 21 -- 25 2
Laid-Up -- -- -- 1
Effective Utilization 56% -- 61% --
Day Rate $5,192 -- $2,330 --
WEST AFRICA
Vessels 32 4 6 1
Laid-Up -- -- -- --
Effective Utilization 80% 72% 97% --
Day Rate $7,223 $6,131 $3,028 --
MIDDLE EAST
Vessels 6 6 7 6
Laid-Up -- -- -- 1
Effective Utilization 90% 56% 86% 52%
Day Rate $3,283 $4,457 $1,682 $5,213
SOUTHEAST ASIA
Vessels 9 1 -- 1
Laid-Up -- -- -- --
Effective Utilization 59% -- -- --
Day Rate $5,936 -- -- --
- ---------------
(1) Domestic consists of vessels operating in the United States, the U.S.
Gulf of Mexico and Mexico.
12
Q1 2002 Q2 2002
AHTS/ AHT/ Crew/ AHTS/ AHT/ Crew/
Supply Tugs Utility Other Supply Tugs Utility Other
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------
DOMESTIC(1)
Vessels(2)
(3)(4)(8)(9) 24 -- 30 2 21 -- 31 2
Bareboat-out(4) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Laid-Up -- -- -- 1 -- -- -- 1
Effective
Utilization(5) 59% -- 65% -- 63% -- 58% --
Day Rate $6,687 -- $2,666 -- $6,005 -- $2,469 --
WEST AFRICA
Vessels(2)(3)(6)
(7)(8)(12) 29 5 7 1 30 5 6 1
Laid-Up -- 1 -- -- -- 1 -- --
Effective
Utilization(5) 84% 86% 89% 97% 85% 97% 84% --
Day Rate $7,368 $6,613 $3,124 -- $8,042 $6,522 $2,722 --
MIDDLE EAST
Vessels(2) 6 8 8 5 6 8 8 5
Laid-Up -- 1 1 1 -- 1 1 1
Effective
Utilization(5) 83% 75% 81% 77% 79% 62% 85% 66%
Day Rate $3,265 $4,571 $1,649 $4,502 $3,250 $5,048 $1,668 $4,475
SOUTHEAST ASIA
Vessels(2)(7)(10) 8 -- 5 2 8 -- -- 2
Laid-Up -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Effective
Utilization(5) 59% -- 53% 44% 68% -- -- --
Day Rate $5,510 -- $1,472 -- $6,320 -- -- --
Q3 2002 Q4 2002
AHTS/ AHT/ Crew/ AHTS/ AHT/ Crew/
Supply Tugs Utility Other Supply Tugs Utility Other
------ ------ ------- ------ ------ ------ ------- ------
DOMESTIC(1)(13)
Vessels(2)(8)(9) 21 -- 31 2 21 -- 28 2
Bareboat-out -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Laid-Up -- -- -- 1 -- -- -- 1
Effective
Utilization(5) 63% -- 62% -- 65% -- 65% --
Day Rate $5,581 -- $2,530 -- $5,252 -- $2,315 --
WEST AFRICA
Vessels(2)(12) 30 5 6 1 30 4 6 1
Laid-Up -- 1 -- -- -- -- -- --
Effective
Utilization(5) 80% 87% 76% -- 79% 71% 68% --
Day Rate $7,787 $6,234 $2,976 -- $7,316 $5,891 $2,878 --
MIDDLE EAST
Vessels(2)(11) 6 8 8 5 6 7 7 5
Laid-Up(11) -- 1 1 1 -- -- -- 1
Effective
Utilization(5) 92% 49% 88% 65% 86% 71% 95% 57%
Day Rate $3,496 $4,556 $1,646 $4,181 $3,684 $3,991 $1,666 $4,197
SOUTHEAST ASIA
Vessels(2) 8 -- -- 2 8 -- -- 2
Laid-Up -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Effective
Utilization(5) 66% -- -- -- 61% -- -- --
Day Rate $5,584 -- -- -- $6,484 -- -- --
- ---------------
(1) Domestic consists of vessels operating in the United States, the U.S.
Gulf of Mexico and Mexico.
(2) Held-for-sale and bareboat-out vessels are excluded from the vessel
count.
(3) During Q1 2002, two Anchor Handling Tug Supply Vessels were transferred
from Domestic to West Africa.
(4) During Q1 2002, a bareboat contract for one Geophysical Vessel in the
Domestic operating region expired and the vessel was returned to the
Company.
(5) Effective utilization excludes laid-up vessels.
(6) During Q1 2002, the Company reactivated one AHT from "held-for-sale"
status. This vessel was placed into service in West Africa.
(7) During Q1 2002, the Company reactivated one Anchor Handling Tug Supply
Vessel from "held-for-sale" status and placed the vessel into service
in Southeast Asia. Additionally during Q1 2002, the Company transferred
one utility boat from Southeast Asia to West Africa.
(8) During Q2 2002, two Anchor Handling Tug Supply Vessels were sold.
Additionally during Q2 2002, the Company transferred one supply vessel
to West Africa.
(9) During Q2 2002, one Crewboat was returned to Domestic from Trinidad.
(10) During Q2 2002, five Crewboats in Southeast Asia were sold.
(11) During Q4 2002, two Anchor Handling Tugs and one Crewboat in the Middle
East were sold.
(12) During Q4 2002, one Anchor Handling Tug in West Africa was sold.
(13) During Q4 2002, three Crewboats were moved to held-for-sale. They were
subsequently sold in January 2003.
13
Domestic revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2003 was
adversely affected by the continued slowdown in natural gas and crude oil
drilling activity in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Despite relatively high natural
gas prices and dwindling inventories, exploration and production companies in
the U.S. Gulf of Mexico were unwilling to invest in new projects until there was
clear evidence of the sustainability of commodity prices and an increase in
energy demand. Although there is still uncertainty in the market, the rise in
both crude oil and natural gas prices that began in the fourth quarter of 2002,
driven by concern over a potential Middle East conflict, the temporary shutoff
of Iraqi and Venezuelan imports, dwindling inventories of both crude oil and
natural gas as the winter of 2002/2003 turned out to be much colder than
expected, and other factors, should eventually aid a recovery in the Gulf of
Mexico offshore vessel market. In the meantime, the Company is exploring charter
opportunities in Mexico, which remains a healthy market. The recent increase in
worldwide crude oil inventories and subsequent decline in crude oil prices
following the conclusion of the war phase in Iraq complicates the outlook,
however.
International offshore revenues for the first quarter of 2003 were
slightly lower than the same period in the prior year. In West Africa, the
demand for vessels, and hence utilization, remained strong as this is an
oil-driven market with longer time horizons and increasing exploration and
production budgets primarily from oil company majors. The Company redeployed one
vessel and added one newbuild vessel to its West African operations during the
first quarter of 2003. The recent unrest in Nigeria did not have a significant
impact on the Company's operations.
International vessel demand is primarily driven by crude oil
production. During the first quarter of 2003, crude oil prices and demand
remained firm. The Company expects international exploration and production
spending to continue to increase in West Africa, which should strengthen vessel
demand in that area. Revenue decreased from the prior year for the Company's
Middle East operations as both vessel count and utilization decreased. In
Southeast Asia, revenue increased over the year-earlier period as day rates were
higher and two new vessels were added to the fleet.
Average day rates and utilization for the Company's anchor handling tug
supply vessels and supply boats at May 1, 2003 for Domestic, West Africa, the
Middle East and Southeast Asia were approximately $5,200/57%, $6,600/91%,
$5,600/75% and $3,300/83%, respectively. The Company had two offshore vessels in
"held-for-sale" status as of March 31, 2003.
SEABULK TANKERS
Revenue from the Company's marine transportation services is derived
from the operations of ten tankers carrying crude oil, petroleum products and
chemical products in the U.S. Jones Act trade.
The Company's tanker fleet operates on either long-term time charters,
bareboat charters, or pursuant to contracts of affreightment. The Company
currently has six tankers operating under long-term time charters, three on
contracts of affreightment and one under a bareboat charter.
14
The following table sets forth the number of vessels and revenue for
the Company's petroleum and chemical product carriers:
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
--------------------------
2003 2002
------- -------
Number of vessels owned at end of period ... 10 10
Revenue (in thousands) ..................... $30,177 $28,688
Tanker revenue increased by 5.2% in the first quarter of 2003 as a
result of improved rates and higher utilization.
Petroleum Tankers. Demand for crude oil and petroleum product
transportation services is dependent both on production and refining levels as
well as on consumer and commercial consumption of petroleum products and
chemicals. The Company owned eight petroleum product tankers at March 31, 2003.
Five of these are double-hull, state-of-the-art vessels, of which two have
chemical-carrying capability. Since January 2002, a major oil company charterer
has exclusive possession and control of one of the petroleum product tankers and
is responsible for all operating and drydocking expenses of the vessel. In the
third quarter of 2002, a vessel previously trading under a voyage charter
entered into a three-year time charter with a major oil company, and two of our
existing time charters were extended through July 10, 2010. Under a time
charter, fuel and port charges are borne by the charterer customer and are
therefore not reflected in the charter rates. Consequently, both the revenue and
cost side of time charter vessels are reduced by the amount of the fuel and port
charges. Our Jones Act fleet is benefiting from a tightening domestic tanker
market, which should see a further strengthening as OPA 90 forces out older,
single-hull vessels. None of our single-hull vessels is scheduled for retirement
under OPA 90 before 2007.
Chemical Tankers. Demand for industrial chemical transportation
services generally coincides with overall economic activity. The Company
operated two chemical tankers and one of the five double-hull vessels in the
chemical trade as of March 31, 2003. The two chemical tankers are double-bottom
ships. The higher day rate environment for petroleum tankers is carrying over
into the chemical tanker market as charterers look for quality tonnage to
replace older single-hull vessels.
SEABULK TOWING
Revenue derived from the Company's tug operations is primarily a
function of the number of tugs available to provide services, the rates charged
for their services, the volume of vessel traffic requiring docking and other
ship-assist services and competition. Vessel traffic, in turn, is largely a
function of the general trade activity in the region served by the port.
The following table summarizes certain operating information for the
Company's tugs:
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
------------------------
2003 2002
------ ------
Number of tugs at end of period ... 30 31
Revenue (in thousands) ............ $9,289 $8,060
Towing revenue increased 15.2% due to increased vessel traffic in
certain of the Company's ports, and other factors.
15
The Company has been the sole provider of docking services in Port
Canaveral, the smallest of its harbor towing markets. As a result of a recent
proceeding before the Federal Maritime Commission, the Company is expected to
have a competitor in Port Canaveral. Port Canaveral Towing intends to continue
its operations at Port Canaveral.
OVERVIEW OF OPERATING EXPENSES AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
The Company's operating expenses are primarily a function of fleet size
and utilization. The most significant expense categories are crew payroll and
benefits, maintenance and repairs, fuel, insurance and charter hire. For general
information concerning these categories of operating expenses as well as capital
expenditures, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, Overview of Operating Expenses and Capital
Expenditures" in the 2002 Form 10-K.
16
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth certain selected financial data and
percentages of revenue for the periods indicated:
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
-------------------------------------------------------
2003 2002
-------------------- ----------------------
(in millions)
Revenue ..................................... $77.2 100% $83.2 100%
Operating expenses .......................... 41.4 54 45.7 55
Overhead expenses ........................... 9.3 12 8.9 11
Depreciation, amortization and drydocking ... 16.5 21 16.6 20
----- --- ----- ---
Income from operations ...................... $10.0 13% $12.0 14%
===== === ===== ====
Interest expense, net ....................... $ 8.0 10% $12.7 15%
===== === ===== ====
Other income, net ........................... $ 0.8 0.1% $ 0.1 0.2%
===== === ===== ====
Net income (loss) ........................... $ 1.6 2% $(2.3) (3)%
===== === ===== ====
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003 COMPARED WITH THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2002
Revenue. Revenue decreased 7.2% to $77.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2003 from $83.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2002.
Offshore energy support revenue decreased 12.6% to $37.8 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $43.3 million for the same period in
2002, primarily due to reduced revenue from the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. The
decrease in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico was primarily due to reduced exploration and
production activity in response to uncertain economic conditions and reduced
demand for energy.
Marine transportation revenue decreased 5.5% to $30.2 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2003 from $31.9 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2002. This decrease is primarily due to the decrease in revenue for
the Company's Sun State Marine Services subsidiary as a result of discontinuing
operations in March 2002. This was partially offset by an increase in tanker
revenue due to an increase in rates and higher utilization.
Towing revenue increased by 15.2% for the three months ended March 31,
2003 compared to the same period in the prior year. The increase in revenue is
due to increased vessel traffic in certain of the Company's ports, and other
factors.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses decreased 9.6% to $41.4 million
for the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $45.7 million for the same period
in 2002, primarily due to the decrease in operating expenses for the Company's
Sun State Marine Services subsidiary as a result of discontinuing operations in
March 2002 and, to a lesser extent, from the reduction in crewing payroll in the
struggling U.S. Gulf of Mexico market. Additionally, repairs and maintenance
expenses decreased in the tanker segment as major repairs were done in the first
quarter of 2002. As a percentage of revenue, operating expenses decreased to 54%
for the three months ended March 31, 2003 from 55% for the 2002 period.
17
Overhead Expenses. Overhead expenses increased 4.4% to $9.3 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $8.9 million for the same period in
2002, primarily due to an increase in accounting and legal fees. As a percentage
of revenue, overhead expenses increased to 12% for the three months ended March
31, 2003 compared to 11% for the same period in 2002.
Depreciation, Amortization and Drydocking. Depreciation, amortization
and drydocking remained substantially the same at $16.5 million versus $16.6
million for the same period in the prior year.
Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense decreased 36.9% to $8.0
million or 10% of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2003 from $12.7
million or 15% of revenue for the same period in 2002. The decrease is primarily
due to a lower debt balance and lower interest rates as a result of the
recapitalization in September 2002.
Other Income, Net. Other income, net increased to $0.8 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2003 from $0.1 million for the same period in 2002,
primarily due to a gain on asset sales in 2003 compared to a loss on asset sales
in the 2002 period.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flows. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $27.7
million for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to $29.8 million for
the same period in 2002. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities
is primarily a result of a reduction in the insurance reimbursements from our
insurance club for settlement of outstanding insurance claims in the first
quarter of 2003 versus the same period in the prior year. This was partially
offset by an increase in net income before non-cash charges.
Net cash used in investing activities was $18.5 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2003 compared to $1.8 million for the same period in
2002. The increase in cash used in investing activities is due to the cash
purchase of the Seabulk Africa in January 2003 (See Note 2).
Net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March
31, 2003 was $7.1 million compared to $15.5 million for the same period in 2002.
The decrease in cash used in financing activities is attributable to larger
payments on our previous term loans and revolving credit facility in the first
quarter of 2002.
Recent Expenditures and Future Cash Requirements. During the first
three months of 2003, the Company incurred $20.8 million in capital expenditures
for fleet improvements and drydocking costs. For the remainder of 2003, these
capital expenditures are expected to aggregate approximately $25 million. The
Company received net proceeds of approximately $13.3 million from the
sale-leaseback of the Seabulk Africa in the second quarter of 2003. Total 2003
expenditures of approximately $46 million will substantially cover all of the
Company's drydocking requirements for 64 vessels during 2003.
18
Long-term debt consisted of the following at March 31, 2003:
OUTSTANDING BALANCE
2003 AS OF INTEREST RATE AS OF
FACILITY PAYMENTS MARCH 31, 2003 MATURITY MAY 1, 2003
-------- -------- ------------------- -------- -------------------
Fortis Tranche A revolver $5.0 million $93.7 million 2007 5.30%
Fortis Tranche B term loan $0.0 million $80.0 million 2007 5.80%
Title XI Financing Bonds $0.5 million $234.0 million 2005 to 2024 5.86% to 10.10%
Other notes payable $0.9 million $21.2 million 2003 to 2011 8.09% to 8.50%
In addition to the revolver balance of $93.7 million, there are $1.3
million in outstanding letters of credit as of March 31, 2003. The Company is
required to make semi-annual principal repayments of the revolver commencing six
months after September 2002 with the final payment due in September 2007. The
Company is also required to make semi-annual principal repayments on the term
loan commencing 36 months after September 2002 with the final payment due 54
months after September 2002.
The Company's capital requirements arise primarily from its need to
service debt, fund working capital and maintain and improve its vessels. The
Company's expected 2003 capital requirements for debt service, vessel
maintenance and fleet improvements total approximately $98 million. The Company
expects that cash flow from operations will continue to be a significant source
of funds for our working capital and capital requirements.
Management continues implementation of certain initiatives in an effort
to improve profitability and liquidity. These initiatives include (1) selective
acquisitions and charters of additional vessels, (2) repositioning certain
vessels to take advantage of higher day rates, (3) selling unprofitable vessels,
and (4) eliminating non-essential operating and overhead expenses.
Management recognizes that unforeseen events or business conditions,
including deterioration in its markets, could prevent the Company from meeting
targeted operating results.
If unforeseen events or business conditions prevent the Company from
meeting targeted operating results, the Company has alternative means including
additional asset sales, additional reductions in operating expenses and deferral
of capital expenditures, which should enable it to satisfy essential capital
requirements. While the Company believes it could successfully complete
alternative plans if necessary, there can be no assurance that such alternatives
would be available or that the Company would be successful in their
implementation.
EFFECTS OF INFLATION
The rate of inflation has not had a material impact on our operations.
Moreover, if inflation remains at its recent levels, it is not expected to have
a material impact on our operations for the foreseeable future.
19
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45"),
Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN 45 expands on the accounting
guidance of Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and incorporates without change the
provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 34, which is being superseded. FIN 45
elaborates on the existing disclosure requirements for most guarantees,
including loan guarantees such as standby letters of credit. It also clarifies
that at the time a company issues a guarantee, it must recognize an initial
liability for the fair value, or market value, of the obligations it assumes
under that guarantee and must disclose that information in its interim and
annual financial statements. The initial recognition and initial measurement
provisions apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or modified after
December 31, 2002, regardless of the guarantor's fiscal year-end. The disclosure
requirements in the Interpretation are effective for financial statements of
interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45
is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company.
In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB
Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 14, and Technical
Corrections, which eliminates the requirement that gains and losses from the
extinguishment of debt be aggregated and, if material, classified as an
extraordinary item, net of the related income tax effect, and eliminates an
inconsistency between the accounting for sale-leaseback transactions and certain
lease modifications that have economic effects that are similar to
sale-leaseback transactions. Subsequent to the January 1, 2003 adoption date of
the standard, the Company will be required to reclassify to continuing
operations amounts previously reported as extinguishments of debt.
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which addresses the financial
accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities.
SFAS No. 146 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2002.
The adoption of the standard is not expected to have a significant impact on the
Company.
In June 2001, the Accounting Executive Committee of the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued an exposure draft of a proposed
Statement of Position ("SOP") entitled Accounting for Certain Costs and
Activities Related to Property, Plant and Equipment. Under the proposed SOP, the
Company would expense major maintenance costs as incurred and prohibit the use
of the deferral of the entire cost of a planned major maintenance activity.
Currently, the costs incurred to drydock the Company's vessels are deferred and
amortized on a straight-line basis over the period to the next drydocking,
generally 30 to 36 months. Management has determined that this SOP, if issued as
proposed, would have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
In the year of adoption, the Company would write-off the net book value of the
deferred drydocking costs and record the write off as a change in accounting
principle ($24.4 million as of March 31, 2003). Additionally, all drydock
expenditures incurred after the adoption of the SOP would be expensed as
incurred.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES OF MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates,
which may adversely affect its results of operations and financial condition.
The Company's policy is not to use financial instruments for trading or other
speculative purposes, and the Company is not a party to any leveraged financial
instruments. The Company manages market risk by restricting the use of
derivative financial instruments to infrequent purchases of forward contracts
for the purchase of fuel oil for its carrier fleet. These contracts have been
terminated as of December 31, 2001.
20
The Jones Act restricts the U.S. coastwise trade to vessels owned,
operated and crewed substantially by U.S. citizens. The Jones Act continues to
be in effect and supported by Congress and the Administration. However, it is
possible that the Company's advantage as a U.S. citizen operator of Jones Act
vessels could be somewhat eroded over time as there continue to be periodic
efforts and attempts by foreign interests to circumvent certain aspects of the
Jones Act.
Exposure To Short-Term Interest Rates. Short-term variable rate debt,
primarily borrowings under the New Credit Facility, comprised approximately
$173.7 million of the Company's total debt at March 31, 2003. The Company's
variable rate debt had an average interest rate of 5.5% at March 31, 2003. A
hypothetical 2.0% increase in interest rates on $173.7 million of debt would
cause the Company's interest expense to increase on average approximately $2.5
million per year over the term of the loans, with a corresponding decrease in
income before taxes.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
The Company maintains systems of disclosure controls and procedures
designed to provide reasonable assurance that the Company is able to record,
process, summarize and report the information required in the Company's annual
and quarterly reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Management of
the Company has evaluated the effectiveness of these disclosure controls and
procedures within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report. Based upon
that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to
accomplish their purpose. No significant changes were made to these internal
controls or other factors that could significantly affect these controls
subsequent to the date of their evaluation, nor were any corrective actions with
respect to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses necessary subsequent
to that date.
Appearing immediately following the signatures section of this
quarterly report are certifications by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, which are required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002. The information set forth in this Item 4 should be read in conjunction
with these Section 302 certifications.
21
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For information concerning certain legal proceedings see Note 7 of the
financial statements.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Accompanying the filing of this Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2003, we have provided to the Securities and Exchange Commission
the Certifications of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer required pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1359, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
10.18 Severance Agreement and Release between the Company
and Andrew W. Brauninger.
10.19 Seabulk International, Inc. Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan
10.20 Summary Provisions of the Seabulk International, Inc.
Management Annual Incentive Compensation Plan
99.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer
99.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
The following reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended
March 31, 2003:
1. The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated
February 25, 2003. Item 5 was reported and no
financial statements were filed.
2. The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 10, 2003. Item 5 was reported and no financial
statements were filed.
3. The Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K dated
March 31, 2003. Item 5 was reported and no financial
statements were filed.
22
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
/s/ MICHAEL J. PELLICCI
- -------------------------------------
Michael J. Pellicci
VP - Finance and Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: May 14, 2003
23
CERTIFICATION OF
GERHARD E. KURZ, PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
OF SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.. 1350
1. I, Gerhard E. Kurz, certify that I have reviewed this quarterly report
on Form 10-Q of Seabulk International, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
we have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
Date"); and
c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 14, 2003
24
/s/ Gerhard E. Kurz
-----------------------------------------
Name: Gerhard E. Kurz
Title: Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
25
CERTIFICATION OF
VINCENT J. DESOSTOA, PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
OF SEABULK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS.. 1350
1. I, Vincent J. deSostoa, certify that I have reviewed this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q of Seabulk International, Inc.
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
we have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
Date"); and
(c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 14, 2003
26
/s/ Vincent J. deSostoa
-----------------------------------------
Name: Vincent J. deSostoa
Title: Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
27