Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002

Commission File No. 000-22490

FORWARD AIR CORPORATION

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (423) 636-7000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $.01 par value
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x    No   o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.)    Yes   x    No   o

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of March 7, 2003 was approximately $313.6 million based on the closing price of such stock on such date of $18.60.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, as of March 7, 2003 was 21,237,947.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the proxy statement for the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report. Such proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2002.

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

2

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Introduction

     Forward Air Corporation, through its operating subsidiaries (the “Company” or “Forward Air”), offers its customers scheduled ground transportation of cargo as a cost effective, reliable alternative to air transportation. The Company transports cargo that generally must be delivered at a specific time but is less time-sensitive than traditional air freight. This type of cargo is frequently referred to in the transportation industry as “deferred air freight.” Forward Air operates through a network of 80 terminals located at or near airports in the United States and Canada, including a central sorting facility in Columbus, Ohio and regional hubs serving key markets. The Company purchases most of its transportation requirements from owner-operators and, to a lesser extent, from truckload carriers. A typical shipment consists of a pallet load of freight, such as computers, telecommunications equipment, machine parts, trade show exhibit materials or medical equipment. During 2002, an average shipment weighed over 700 pounds. Forward Air has experienced rapid revenue growth from $63.6 million in 1995 to $226.1 million in 2002, a 19.9% compound annual growth rate. The Company’s operating income grew from $6.4 million to $32.7 million over the same period, a 26.2% compound annual growth rate.

     The Company primarily markets its services to: air freight forwarders, which are businesses that arrange transportation of cargo for third parties; integrated air cargo carriers; and airlines. The Company serves its customers by locating terminals at or near airports and maintaining regularly scheduled transportation service between major cities. Forward Air receives shipments at its terminals and transports them by truck to its central sorting facility or to one of its eight regional hubs, where they are unloaded and sorted. After sorting, the shipments are reloaded and delivered to the terminals nearest their destinations. The Company also ships freight directly between terminals when justified by the volume of shipments. The Company typically does not provide local pickup and delivery services and does not market its services directly to shippers. Since the Company does not place significant size or weight restrictions on shipments, it does not compete directly with small or overnight package delivery services such as DHL Worldwide, UPS and Airborne. During 2002, approximately 33% of the shipments the Company handled were for overnight delivery, with approximately 50% for delivery within two to three days and the balance in four to five days.

Industry Overview

     As businesses minimize inventory levels, perform manufacturing and assembly operations in multiple locations and distribute their products through many channels, they more frequently require expedited delivery services. Expedited shipments are those shipments that the customer requires to be delivered the next day or within two to three days, usually at a specified time or within a specified time window.

3

Table of Contents

     Shippers with expedited delivery requirements have four principal alternatives to transport freight: they may use a fully integrated air cargo carrier, a passenger airline, a less-than-truckload carrier or an air freight forwarder. Integrated air cargo carriers provide pick-up and delivery services primarily using their own fleet of trucks and provide transportation services generally using their own fleet of aircraft. Passenger airlines provide airport to airport service, but have limited cargo space and generally place size and weight restrictions on freight. Less- than-truckload carriers provide pick-up and delivery services through their own fleet of trucks. The national less-than-truckload carriers operate terminals where freight is unloaded, sorted and reloaded multiple times in a single shipment. The additional handling increases transit time, handling costs and the likelihood of cargo damage. An air freight forwarder obtains shipments from customers, makes arrangements for transportation of the cargo by a third-party carrier and usually arranges for both delivery from the shipper to the carrier and from the carrier to the recipient.

     Although expedited freight is often transported by aircraft, transportation by truck is a viable alternative, especially for shipments requiring deferred delivery. Generally, the cost of shipping freight, especially heavy freight, by truck is substantially less than shipping by aircraft. The Company believes there are several factors that are increasing demand for lower-cost truck transportation of expedited freight. These trends include:

	Increased Outsourcing of Logistics Management to Third Parties. Air freight forwarders are playing an increasingly important role in logistics management. As the growing emphasis on just-in-time processes has added to the complexity of logistics management, companies are finding it more advantageous to outsource their logistics management functions to third parties. In contrast to integrated air cargo carriers and less-than-truckload carriers that are focused on utilizing their own fixed-cost assets, air freight forwarders can select from various transportation modes and suppliers to meet their customers’ shipping requirements, thereby serving their customers less expensively. Air freight forwarders generally handle shipments of any size and offer customized shipping options, unlike integrated air cargo carriers and less-than-truckload carriers.
	Reduced Airline Cargo Capacity. Since the 1980’s, when the domestic airlines eliminated many of their all-cargo aircraft, growth in demand for air cargo services generally has outpaced the growth of aircraft cargo capacity. More recently, airlines have been modifying their domestic route systems to provide higher frequency service to more destinations, therefore replacing many of their wide-body aircraft with narrow-body aircraft that have less cargo capacity.

Competitive Advantages

     The Company believes that its competitive advantages are:

	–  Focus on the deferred air freight market. Forward Air focuses on providing ground transportation services to the deferred air freight market. The Company believes that this

4

Table of Contents

	focus and commitment to reliable service has enabled Forward Air to provide a higher level of service in a more cost effective manner than its competitors.
	–  Concentrated marketing strategy. The Company provides its services to air freight forwarders, integrated air cargo carriers and airlines rather than marketing its services directly to shippers. The Company does not place significant size or weight restrictions on shipments and, therefore, does not compete with small or overnight package delivery services such as DHL Worldwide, UPS and Airborne. The Company believes that air freight forwarders prefer to purchase their transportation services from Forward Air because it does not market its services to their shipper customers and is not competing with them for customers.
	–  Established nationwide network of terminals and sorting facilities. The Company has built a network throughout the United States and Canada located at or near airports. The Company believes it would be difficult for a competitor to duplicate its nationwide network without the expertise Forward Air has acquired and without expending significant management resources and capital. The Company’s network enables it to provide regularly scheduled service between most markets and on-time delivery with minimal freight damage or loss, all at rates significantly below air freight rates.
	–  Scheduled, time-definite service. The Company adheres to a published schedule for transit times with specific cut-off and recovery times.
	–  Low-capital-intensive business model. The Company purchases virtually all of its transportation requirements from owner-operators or truckload carriers, rather than acquiring and operating its own tractors. This allows the Company to respond quickly to changing demands and opportunities in its industry and to generate a higher return on assets with lower capital expenditures.
	–  Enhanced technology. The Company is committed to using information technology to improve visibility of shipment information and reduce its operating costs. Technology allows the Company to provide real-time tracking and tracing of shipments throughout the transportation process. Forward Air continues to enhance its systems to permit its customers to obtain real-time information both through the Internet and Electronic Data Interchange.
	–  Broad customer base. The Company has established close relationships with a large number of air freight forwarders, integrated air cargo carriers and airlines. The Company’s five largest customers only accounted for approximately 20% of its operating revenue in 2002, with no single customer accounting for more than ten percent.

5

Table of Contents

Growth Strategy

     The key elements of Forward Air’s growth strategy are to:

	–  Increase freight volume from existing customers. Many of the Company’s customers currently use Forward Air for only a portion of their overall transportation needs. In addition, many of the Company’s air freight forwarder customers are growing rapidly, and the Company expects that they will have a greater need for its services as their businesses grow. The Company will continue to market directly to these customers to capture additional freight volume.
	–  Improve efficiency of its transportation network. The Company constantly seeks to improve the efficiency of its network without changing its infrastructure or incurring significant capital expenditures. As the volume of freight between key markets increases, the Company intends to continue to add regional hubs and direct shuttles. Additional regional hubs and direct shuttles improve Forward Air’s efficiency by reducing the number of miles freight must be transported and reducing the number of times freight must be handled and sorted. Increased freight volumes should increase the Company’s profits and operating margins because these additional shipments help cover the substantial fixed costs of its operations.
	–  Develop new customers. The Company actively markets its services to potential new air freight forwarder customers. The Company believes air freight forwarders will move away from integrated air cargo carriers because those carriers charge higher rates and away from less-than-truckload carriers because those carriers provide less reliable service and compete for the same customers. The Company also believes that there is significant potential for increased freight volume from airlines as well as from the integrated air cargo carriers.
	–  Enhance information systems. The Company is committed to continued enhancement of its information systems in ways that can provide it both competitive service advantages and increased productivity. Management believes that information technology will greatly assist in providing the ability to capitalize on new business opportunities. These opportunities include additional lines of distribution and warehousing, where the need for effective information systems is important to the proper operation of these businesses. Forward Air believes its enhanced systems will enable it to retain existing customers and encourage them to increase the volume of freight they send through its network.

6

Table of Contents

	–  Expand logistics services. The Company will continue to expand its national and international logistics services to increase revenue and improve utilization of its terminal facilities and labor force. The Company has added a number of services in the past few years, such as exclusive-use transportation services, customs brokerage and terminal handling services. These services directly benefit Forward Air’s customers, particularly air freight forwarders which cannot justify providing the services themselves, attract new customers and improve utilization of the Forward Air network by increasing its revenue without significantly increasing the Company’s costs.
	–  Pursue acquisitions. The Company intends to continue to evaluate acquisitions that can increase its penetration of a geographic area, add customers or freight density or allow it to offer additional services. Since its inception, the Company has acquired the assets of eight of its regional competitors that met one or more of these criteria.

Operations

     The Company receives freight from air freight forwarders, airlines and integrated air cargo carriers at its terminals, which are located at or near airports in the United States and Canada. The Company consolidates and transports these shipments by truck through the Forward Air network to the terminals nearest the ultimate destinations of the shipments. The Company operates regularly scheduled service to and from each of its terminals through its Columbus, Ohio central sorting facility or through one of its eight regional hubs. The Company also operates regularly scheduled shuttle service directly between cities where the volume of freight warrants bypassing the Columbus sorting facility or a regional hub. When a shipment arrives at the terminal nearest its destination, the customer arranges for the shipment to be picked up at the terminal and delivered to its final destination.

     A typical shipment consists of a pallet load of freight, often computers, telecommunications equipment, machine parts, trade show exhibit materials or medical equipment. Since Forward Air commenced operations in November 1990, the weekly volume of freight moving through its network has increased from an average of approximately 1.2 million pounds to over 24.5 million pounds in 2002. During 2002, an average shipment weighed over 700 pounds. Shipments range from small boxes weighing only a few pounds to large shipments of several thousand pounds. Although the Company imposes no significant size or weight restrictions, it focuses its marketing and price structure on shipments of 200 pounds or more. As a result, the Company does not directly compete for most of its business with overnight couriers or small package delivery companies.

7

Table of Contents

Terminals

     At December 31, 2002, the Forward Air network included terminals located in the following 80 cities:

*

Denotes an agent location.

8

Table of Contents

     Independent agents operated 20 of these locations, which typically handle relatively low volumes of freight.

Shuttle Service And Regional Hubs

     The Company operates direct terminal-to-terminal shuttles and regional overnight service between cities where justified by freight volumes. The Company currently provides regional overnight service to many of the markets within its network. Direct service allows the Company to provide quicker scheduled service at a lower cost because it can transport freight over the most direct route and eliminate the added time and cost of handling the freight at its central or a regional hub sorting facility. Direct shipments also reduce the likelihood of damage because of reduced handling and sorting of the freight. As Forward Air continues to increase volume between various cities, it intends to continue to add direct shuttles. For example, the Northeast Shuttle transports freight between Albany, Baltimore, Boston, Buffalo, Hartford, Newark, Newburgh, New York, Philadelphia, Rochester, Syracuse and Washington. The Company accomplishes this by direct shipment, as from Boston to Newark, or by overnight service routed through the Newburgh regional hub. Where warranted by sufficient volume in a region, the Company utilizes larger terminals as regional sorting hubs, which allows it to bypass the Columbus sorting facility. These regional hubs improve the Company’s operating efficiency and enhance customer service. The Company currently operates regional hubs in Atlanta, Dallas/Ft. Worth, Kansas City, Los Angeles, New Orleans, Newburgh, Orlando and San Francisco.

Shipments

     Since operations were commenced in November 1990, the average weekly volume of freight moving through the Company’s network has increased from an average of approximately 1.2 million pounds to over 24.5 million pounds per week as shown below:

9

Table of Contents

Customers and Marketing

     The Company’s customers are primarily air freight forwarders, airlines and integrated air cargo carriers. Air freight forwarder customers vary in size from small, independent, single facility companies to large, international logistics companies, such as AIT Freight Systems, Associated Global Systems, Danzas/AEI, Exel and Pilot Air Freight. Airline customers include British Airways, Continental, KLM, Northwest Airlines and Virgin Atlantic. Because of Forward Air’s reputation for dependable service, integrated air cargo carriers such as DHL Worldwide Express, Emery Worldwide, Federal Express and UPS utilize its services to provide overflow capacity and other services.

     The Company markets its services through a sales and marketing staff located in various regions of the United States. Senior management also is actively involved in sales and marketing at the national account level and supports local sales activity. The Company has a strong commitment to marketing and focuses on air freight forwarders, airlines and integrated air cargo carriers that have time sensitive shipping requirements requiring customized services. The Company also participates in air cargo trade shows and advertises its services through direct mail programs and through the Internet.

Logistics Services

     Customers increasingly demand more than the movement of freight from their transportation providers. To meet these demands, the Company continually seeks ways to customize its logistics services and add new services.

     Forward Air logistics services allow customers to access the following services from a single source:

	–		exclusive-use transportation services;
	–		dock, warehouse and office space;
	–		customs brokerage, such as assistance with customs procedures for both import and export shipments; and
	–		terminal handling, such as shipment build-up and break-down and reconsolidation of air or ocean pallets or containers.

Technology and Information Systems

     The regular enhancement of the Company’s information systems is a key component of its growth strategy. The Company has invested and expects to continue to invest significant management and financial resources maintaining a sophisticated information system that provides information to its customers and employees. The Company

10

Table of Contents

believes the ability to provide reliable and timely information on the status of shipments is critical to its customers. The Company believes that its information systems afford it competitive service advantages while promoting increased productivity throughout the Forward Air network.

Purchased Transportation

     The Company contracts for most of its transportation services from owner-operators. The owner-operators own, operate and maintain their own vehicles and employ their own drivers. The Company purchases the balance of required transportation from truckload carriers. Of the $99.3 million of purchased transportation in 2002, the Company purchased 66.2% from owner-operators and 33.8% from other common carriers.

     The Company seeks to establish long-term relationships with owner-operators to assure dependable service and availability. The Company has established guidelines relating to safety records, driving experience and personal evaluations that it uses to select its owner-operators. To enhance the Company’s relationship with owner-operators, it pays per mile rates above prevailing market rates and offers each driver a consistent work schedule, typically to the same destination.

Competition

     The air freight transportation industry is highly competitive and very fragmented. The Company’s competitors include regional trucking companies that specialize in handling deferred air freight and regional and national less-than-truckload carriers. To a lesser extent, the Company competes with integrated air cargo carriers and airlines. According to The Colography Group, Inc., an independent industry market research and consulting company, total revenue in 2003 for the U.S. domestic air market is expected to be $30.7 billion. Approximately $3.7 billion or 11.9% of that market is made up of heavyweight overnight and deferred freight, representing the portion of the market within which the Company believes it competes. The Company’s competition ranges from small operators that compete within a limited geographic area to companies with substantially greater financial and other resources and larger freight capacity. The Company also faces competition from its air freight forwarder customers who decide to establish their own networks to transport deferred air freight. The Company believes competition is based on service, primarily on-time delivery and reliability, as well as rates. The Company believes it offers its services at rates that are substantially below the charge to transport the same shipment to the same destination by air. The Company believes it has an advantage over less-than-truckload carriers based upon its reputation for faster, more reliable service between many cities.

Seasonality

     Historically, the Company’s operating results have been subject to seasonal trends when measured on a quarterly basis. The first quarter has traditionally been the weakest and the third and fourth quarters have traditionally been the strongest. Typically, this pattern has been the result of factors such as climate, national holidays, customer demand and economic conditions. A significant portion of the Company’s revenue is derived from customers whose business levels are impacted by the economy.

11

Table of Contents

Employees

     As of December 31, 2002, the Company employed 1,618 persons, 835 of whom were freight handlers and customer service personnel. None of the Company’s employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. The Company recognizes that its workforce, including its freight handlers, is one of its most valuable assets. The recruitment, training and retention of qualified employees are essential to support the Company’s continued growth and to meet the service requirements of its customers.

Risk Management and Litigation

     Under Department of Transportation regulations, the Company may be liable for property damage or personal injuries caused by owner-operators while they are transporting freight on its behalf. The Company is self-insured for property damage to its own equipment. The Company believes that its insurance coverage is sufficient to adequately protect it from significant claims.

     From time to time, the Company is a party to litigation arising in the normal course of its business, most of which involve claims for personal injury, property damage related to the transportation and handling of freight, or workers’ compensation. The Company does not believe that any of these pending actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations.

Regulation

     The Company, through its Forward Air, Inc. subsidiary, is a licensed property broker holding authority issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (“FMCSA”) at Docket No. MC-249708. The Company, through its FAF, Inc. subsidiary, is an interstate motor carrier licensed by the FMCSA at Docket No. MC-333604.

     The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with applicable regulatory requirements relating to its operations. If the Company does not comply with applicable laws and regulations, it could be required to pay substantial fines and could have its licenses revoked.

     The Company is also subject to federal and state environmental laws and regulations, including those dealing with the transportation of hazardous materials and storage of fuel. The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations. The Company does not expect any material expenditures for compliance with federal, state or local environmental laws and regulations in 2003.

12

Table of Contents

Website Access

     The Company files reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and other reports from time to time. The Company is an electronic filer and the SEC maintains an Internet site at that contains the reports, proxy and information statements, and other information filed electronically. The Company’s website address is Please note that this website address is provided as an inactive textual reference only. The Company makes available free of charge through its website, the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. The information provided on the website is not part of this report, and is therefore not incorporated by reference unless such information is otherwise specifically referenced elsewhere in this report.

13

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Properties and Equipment

     Management believes that the Company has adequate facilities for the conduct of its business, including properties owned and leased. Management further believes that in the event replacement property is needed, it will be available on terms and at costs substantially similar to the terms and costs experienced by competitors within the transportation industry.

     The Company leases its 37,500 square foot headquarters in Greeneville, Tennessee from the Greeneville-Greene County Airport Authority. The lease term ends in 2006 and has two ten-year and one five-year renewal options. The Company owns its 83,800 square foot Columbus, Ohio central hub sorting facility.

     During the fourth quarter of 2002, the City of Atlanta filed a petition for condemnation and declaration of taking for property owned by Transportation Properties, Inc. and occupied by Forward Air, Inc., two wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. The condemnation is in connection with the Fifth Runway Airport Expansion Project at Atlanta Hartsfield International Airport. According to the petition, the City of Atlanta has taken ownership of the property and building and deposited $2.6 million into the registry of the court as compensation to Transportation Properties, Inc. As of December 31, 2002, the property and building and leasehold improvements had been removed from the Company’s balance sheet and the Company is now paying rent to the City of Atlanta in connection with occupying the premises. Forward Air, Inc., as the tenant, will continue to occupy the premises and has a second facility in the Atlanta airport sub-market in which to conduct business until the Company and City of Atlanta reach an agreement on the value of the property and the timing of vacating the premises. The Company recognized a gain of $350,000 during 2002 on the Atlanta property.

     During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company repaid early its State of Ohio 1993-8 Ohio Enterprise Bond Fund bond issue with the Director of Development of the State of Ohio for its 83,800 square foot Columbus, Ohio central hub sorting facility. The amount required to satisfy the bond obligation was $3.9 million and resulted in a one-time charge for the early extinguishment of debt of $456,000 which the Company recognized during 2002.

     The Company leases and maintains terminals in 59 additional cities located at or near various airports in the United States and Canada. Lease terms are typically for three to five years. The remaining 20 terminals are agent stations operated by independent agents who handle freight for the Company on a commission basis.

     The Company owns or leases the trailers it uses to move freight through the Forward Air network. Substantially all of the Company’s trailers are 53’ long, and many have specialized roller bed equipment required to serve air cargo industry customers. The average age of the Company’s owned trailer fleet was approximately 3.3 years at December 31, 2002.

14

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     From time to time, the Company is a party to litigation arising in the normal course of its business, most of which involve claims for personal injury, property damage related to the transportation and handling of freight, or workers’ compensation. The Company does not believe that any of these pending actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise.

15

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

     Pursuant to Instruction 3 to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K and General Instruction G(3) to Form 10-K, the following information is included in Part I of this report.

     The following are the Company’s executive officers:

     There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers of the Company. All officers hold office at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

     Scott M. Niswonger is a co-founder of the Company and has served as a director since its founding in October 1981 and as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer since February 1988. Mr. Niswonger served as President of the Company from October 1981 until August 1998. He also serves as a director and executive officer of Landair Corporation (“Landair”) and as a director of People’s Community Bank.

     Bruce A. Campbell has served as Chief Operating Officer of the Company since April 1990, as director since April 1993 and as President since August 1998. Mr. Campbell served as Executive Vice President of the Company from April 1990 until August 1998. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Campbell served as Vice President of Ryder-Temperature Controlled Carriage in Nashville, Tennessee from September 1985 until December 1989. Mr. Campbell also serves as a director of Greene County Bancshares.

     Andrew C. Clarke has served the Company as a director and as Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and Treasurer since April 2001. Since April 2000, he has also served as Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President and director of a Company subsidiary that provides Internet and technology services and support to the Company. From August 1998 to March 2000, Mr. Clarke was an investment banker with Deutsche Banc Alex. Brown in the Global Transportation Group. From June 1997 until September 1997, he worked in the high yield group at Smith Barney Inc., and from August 1993 until June 1996 in the mergers and acquisitions group at A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.

16

Table of Contents

     Craig A. Drum became Senior Vice President, Sales in July 2001 after joining the Company in January 2000 as Vice President, Sales of the Company’s Internet and technology service and support subsidiary. In February 2001, Mr. Drum was promoted to Vice President of National Accounts. Prior to January 2000, Mr. Drum spent most of his 24-year career with Delta Air Lines, Inc., most recently as the Director of Sales and Marketing — Cargo.

     Matthew J. Jewell has served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of the Company since July 2002. In October 2002, he was also appointed Secretary. From January 2000 to joining the Company in July 2002, Mr. Jewell was a partner with the law firm of Austin & Sparks, P.C. Mr. Jewell was an associate at Dennis, Corry & Porter, L.L.P. from July 1991 to December 1998 and a partner from January 1999 to January 2000. Mr. Jewell is also an executive officer of Landair.

     Chris C. Ruble has served as Senior Vice President, Operations of the Company since October 2001. He was Regional Vice President from September 1997 to October 2001, regional manager from February 1997 to September 1997 after starting with the Company as a terminal manager in January 1996. From June 1986 to August 1995, Mr. Ruble served in various management capacities at Roadway Package System, Inc.

17

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

     The $0.01 par value common stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”) trades on The NASDAQ National Market tier of The NASDAQ Stock Market® under the symbol “FWRD.” The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices for the Common Stock as reported by The NASDAQ National Market for each full quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years.

     There were approximately 3,000 shareholders of record (including brokerage firms and other nominees) of the Common Stock as of December 31, 2002.

     The Company did not pay cash dividends on its Common Stock in the two preceding fiscal years, and it is the current intention of management to retain earnings to finance the growth of the Company’s business. Future payment of dividends will depend upon the financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions and capital requirements of the Company, as well as other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors. No securities of the Company were sold during fiscal year 2002 without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

     The following table provides information as of December 31, 2002 with respect to shares of the Common Stock that may be issued under existing equity compensation plans, including the Company’s 1992 Amended and Restated Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “1992 Plan”), 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “1999 Plan”), the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (the “NED Plan”), the 2000 Non-Employee Director Award (the “2000 NED Award”) and the Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”).

18

Table of Contents

(1)		Consists of the 1992 Plan, the 1999 Plan, the NED Plan and the ESPP.
(2)		Represents the 2000 NED Award to a non-employee director granted upon his appointment in July 2000. The non-qualified options are fully exercisable and generally expire upon the earlier of 90 days from the date the director ceases to serve the Company, or on July 18, 2010.
(3)		Includes 315,392 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options under the expired 1992 Plan, as of December 31, 2002. No additional options may be granted under the 1992 Plan.
(4)		Includes the weighted-average exercise price of options outstanding under the 1992 Plan. Excludes purchase rights accruing under the ESPP which have a shareholder approved reserve of 900,000 shares. Under the ESPP, each eligible employee may purchase up to 1,300 shares of Common Stock at semi-annual intervals each year at a purchase price per share equal to 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the Common Stock at close of (i) the first trading day of a purchase period, or (ii) the last trading day of a purchase period.
(5)		Includes shares available for future issuance under the ESPP. As of December 31, 2002, an aggregate of 805,158 shares of Common Stock were available for issuance under the ESPP.

19

Table of Contents

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

     The following table sets forth selected financial data of the Company. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements and notes thereto, included elsewhere in this report.

(1)		Reflects the truckload operations which were disposed of in a spin-off in 1998.
(2)		Income from operations as a percentage of operating revenue.
(3)		Restated to reflect a three-for-two stock split distributed in January 2000 and a two-for-one stock split distributed in March 1999.

20

Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Introduction

     The Company provides scheduled ground transportation of cargo on a time-definite basis. As a result of the Company’s established transportation schedule and network of terminals, its operating cost structure includes significant fixed costs. The Company’s ability to improve its operating margins will depend on its ability to increase the volume of freight moved through its network.

Results of Operations

     The following table sets forth the percentage relationship of expense items to operating revenue for the periods indicated.

Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001

     Operating revenue decreased by $1.4 million, or 0.6%, to $226.1 million for 2002 from $227.5 million in 2001. This decrease resulted from a decrease in traditional linehaul revenue of $4.9 million to $192.9 million, an increase in logistics revenue of $3.8 million to $19.2 million and a decrease in other accessorial revenue of $0.3 million to $14.0 million. Traditional linehaul revenue was impacted during the year by an increase in average weekly tonnage of 0.7% and a 3.1% decrease in average revenue per pound versus 2001.

     Purchased transportation represented 43.9% of operating revenue in 2002 compared to 42.9% in 2001. The increase in purchased transportation as a percentage of operating revenue was

21

Table of Contents

primarily the result of an increase in logistics revenue where purchased transportation costs are traditionally higher as a percent of operating revenue than traditional linehaul purchased transportation costs. For 2002, traditional linehaul and logistics purchased transportation costs represented 42.3% and 69.8%, respectively, of operating revenue versus 42.2% and 62.9%, respectively, during 2001.

     Salaries, wages and employee benefits were 22.3% of operating revenue in 2002 compared to 22.4% for 2001. The decrease in salaries, wages and employee benefits as a percentage of operating revenue was attributed to a 0.3% decrease in incentive payments and a 0.1% decrease in workers’ compensation insurance and expenses that was offset in part by a 0.3% increase in group insurance expenses.

     Operating leases, the largest component of which is facility rent, were 5.4% of operating revenue in 2002 compared to 5.1% in 2001. The increase in operating leases as a percentage of operating revenue between periods was primarily attributable to a 0.2% one-time charge associated with the early termination of a leased facility.

     Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of operating revenue was 3.3% in 2002, compared to 3.7% in 2001. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of operating revenue was attributable to a 0.5% decrease in amortization expense as the Company is no longer amortizing goodwill in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 142. The decrease was offset in part by a 0.1% increase in depreciation associated with new operating equipment and information systems.

     Insurance and claims were 1.7% of operating revenue in 2002, compared with 3.3% in 2001. The decrease in insurance and claims as a percentage of operating revenue resulted primarily from a 0.6% favorable premium adjustment under a retroactive premium insurance policy during the fourth quarter of 2002. The Company further experienced a 0.3% decrease in claims expense in 2002 versus 2001. These decreases were offset by a 0.3% increase in insurance premiums.

     Other operating expenses were 8.9% of operating revenue in 2002 compared to 8.7% in 2001. The Company experienced a 0.4% decrease in fuel costs paid to owner-operators, which was offset by a 0.4% increase in miscellaneous expenses, including increases in repair and maintenance and owner-operator recruiting and retention expenses.

     Income from operations increased by $1.0 million, or 3.2%, to $32.7 million for 2002 compared with $31.7 million for 2001. The increase in income from operations was primarily a result of the decrease in non-transportation costs which was offset in part by an increase in transportation costs associated with transporting freight for customers.

     Interest expense was $0.3 million, or 0.2% of operating revenue, in 2002, compared to $0.3 million, or 0.1%, for 2001.

     Other income, net was $1.8 million, or 0.8% of operating revenue, in 2002, compared to $0.9 million, or 0.4%, for 2001. The increase in other income, net resulted primarily from a

22

Table of Contents

$1.3 million settlement with US Xpress Enterprises, Inc. and a $0.4 million gain on the condemnation and resultant sale of a terminal owned by the Company in Atlanta, Georgia offset in part by a $0.5 million charge from the early retirement of debt related to the Company’s facility in Columbus, Ohio. Additionally, the Company earned lower yields on higher balances in both cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities during 2002 versus 2001.

     The combined federal and state effective tax rate for 2002 was 36.7% compared to a rate of 38.3% for 2001 primarily as a result of better tax planning at the state level in addition to higher tax-exempt interest income from available-for-sale securities.

     As a result of the foregoing factors, net income increased by $1.7 million, or 8.5%, to $21.6 million for 2002, from $19.9 million in 2001.

Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000

     Operating revenue increased by $12.6 million, or 5.9%, to $227.5 million for 2001 from $214.9 million in 2000. This increase resulted from an increase in traditional linehaul revenue of $4.2 million, an increase in logistics revenue of $4.8 million and an increase in other accessorial revenue of $3.6 million.

     Purchased transportation was 42.9% of operating revenue in 2001 compared to 42.5% in 2000. The increase in purchased transportation as a percentage of operating revenue was primarily attributable to a 0.5% increase in the amount paid to owner-operators for transportation services as well as a 0.3% increase in amounts paid for cartage services. The increase in purchased transportation costs as a percentage of operating revenue was offset by a 0.4% decrease in the amount paid to common carriers for transportation services.

     Salaries, wages and employee benefits were 22.4% of operating revenue in 2001 compared to 22.0% in 2000. The increase in salaries, wages and employee benefits as a percentage of operating revenue was primarily due to a 1.1% decrease in capitalized salary costs associated with the development of the Company’s Internet-based software in 2000, which was offset by a 0.8% decrease in incentive payments in 2001.

     Operating leases, the largest component of which is terminal rent, were 5.1% of operating revenue in 2001 compared to 4.7% in 2000. The increase in operating leases as a percentage of revenue was attributable to a 0.7% increase in the amount paid for Company-operated terminals in 2001 compared to 2000. The increase in facility rental cost as a percentage of operating revenue was offset by a 0.3% decrease in the amount paid for leased trailers and trucks.

     Depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of operating revenue was 3.7% in 2001, compared to 2.7% in 2000. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of revenue was primarily attributable to a 0.5% increase in depreciation from the capitalized costs associated with the development of internal-use software and a 0.4% increase from the amortization of the goodwill associated with the Dedicated Transportation Services, Inc. and Expedited Delivery Services, Inc. acquisitions.

23

Table of Contents

     Insurance and claims were 3.3% of operating revenue in 2001, compared with 1.7% in 2000. The increase in insurance and claims expense as a percentage of revenue was the result of a 1.3% increase in primary and retrospective premium costs caused by an increase in the frequency and severity of accidents during 2001.

     Other operating expenses were 8.7% of operating revenue in 2001 compared with 9.0% in 2000. The decrease in other operating expenses as a percentage of revenue in 2001 resulted from a 0.3% decrease in office repairs and maintenance expense as well as a 0.2% decrease in end-station handling paid to agents. The decrease in other operating expenses as a percentage of operating revenue was offset by a 0.2% increase in the provision for doubtful accounts.

     Income from operations decreased by $5.6 million, or 15.0%, to $31.7 million for 2001 compared to $37.3 million for 2000. This decrease in income from operations is attributed to a higher operating cost structure incurred to operate the Forward Air network, including higher purchased transportation costs, higher salaries, wages and benefits, a greater number and larger size of terminals, an increase in depreciation and amortization expenses, as well as higher insurance costs. The Company was able to offset these increases, however, by lowering the percentage amount spent on other operating expenses.

     Interest expense was $331,000 in 2001 compared to $107,000 in 2000. The increase in interest expense was due to the discontinuation of the capitalization of interest costs relating to the completion of internal use software during 2001 which was offset by lower average net borrowings during 2001.

     Other income, net was $877,000 in 2001 compared to $773,000 in 2000. The increase in other income, net was due to an increase in cash and interest bearing securities in 2001 as compared to 2000, but was partially offset by lower yields on investments during that same time period.

     The combined federal and state effective tax rate for 2001 was 38.3%, compared to a rate of 38.2% for 2000. For information concerning income taxes, as well as information regarding differences between effective tax rates and statutory rates, see Note 6 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

     As a result of the foregoing factors, net income decreased by $3.5 million, or 15.0%, to $19.9 million for 2001, from $23.4 million in 2000.

Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies

     Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

     The Company evaluates the collectibility of its accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In circumstances in which management is aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to the Company (for example, bankruptcy filings, accounts turned over for collection or litigation), the Company records a specific reserve for bad debts against amounts due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount the Company reasonably

24

Table of Contents

believes will be collected. For all other customers, the Company recognizes reserves for bad debts based on the length of time the receivables are past due. Specifically, amounts that are 90 days or more past due are reserved at 50%. If circumstances change (i.e., higher than expected defaults or an unexpected material adverse change in a customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations to the Company), the estimates of the recoverability of amounts due to the Company could be reduced by a material amount.

     Allowance for Revenue Adjustments

     The Company’s allowance for revenue adjustments consists of amounts reserved for billing rate changes that are not captured upon load initiation. These adjustments generally arise: (1) when the sales department contemporaneously grants small rate changes (“spot quotes”) to customers that differ from the standard rates in the system, (2) when freight requires dimensionalization or is reweighed resulting in a different required rate, (3) when billing errors occur, and (4) when data entry errors occur. When appropriate, permanent rate changes are initiated and reflected in the system. The Company monitors the manual revenue adjustments closely through the employment of various controls that are in place to ensure that revenue recognition is not compromised or that fraud does not occur. During 2002, average revenue adjustments per month were approximately $150,000, on average revenue per month of $18.8 million (less than 1% of monthly revenue). In order to estimate the allowance for revenue adjustments related to ending accounts receivable, the Company prepares an analysis that considers average monthly revenue adjustments and the average lag for identifying and quantifying these revenue adjustments. Based on this analysis, the Company establishes an allowance for approximately 60-80 days (dependent upon experience in the last twelve months) of average revenue adjustments, adjusted for rebates and billing errors. The lag is periodically adjusted based on actual historical experience. Additionally, the average amount of revenue adjustments per month can vary in relation to the level of sales or based on other factors (such as personnel issues that could result in excessive manual errors or in excessive spot quotes being granted). Both of these significant assumptions are continually evaluated for validity.

     Self-Insurance Loss Reserves

     Given the nature of the Company’s operating environment, the Company has been, and in the future will become, subject to vehicle, workers’ compensation and health insurance claims. To mitigate a portion of these risks, the Company maintains insurance for individual vehicle claims exceeding $500,000 and workers’ compensation claims and health insurance claims exceeding $250,000. The amount of self-insurance loss reserves and loss adjustment expenses is determined based on an estimation process that uses information obtained from both Company specific and industry data, as well as general economic information. The estimation process for self-insurance loss exposure requires management to continuously monitor and evaluate the life cycle of claims. Using data obtained from this monitoring and the Company’s assumptions about the emerging trends, management develops information about the size of ultimate claims based on its historical experience and other available market information. The most significant assumptions used in the estimation process include determining the trend in loss costs, the expected consistency in the frequency and severity of claims incurred but not yet reported to prior

25

Table of Contents

year claims, changes in the timing of the reporting of losses from the loss date to the notification date, and expected costs to settle unpaid claims. Management also monitors the reasonableness of the judgments made in the prior year’s estimation process (referred to as a hindsight analysis) and adjusts current year assumptions based on the hindsight analysis.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     The Company has historically financed its working capital needs, including capital purchases, with cash flows from operations and borrowings under the Company’s bank lines of credit. Net cash provided by operating activities totaled approximately $30.0 million for 2002 compared with $35.5 million in 2001.

     Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $0.4 million for 2002 compared with net cash used in investing activities of $31.0 million in 2001. Investing activities consisted primarily of the Expedited Delivery Services, Inc. acquisition in January 2001, and the purchase of operating equipment and management information systems during 2002.

     Net cash used in financing activities totaled approximately $15.2 million for 2002 compared with approximately $0.7 million for 2001. Financing activities included the repayment of long-term debt and capital leases, proceeds received from the exercise of stock options and repurchases of the Company’s common stock.

     The Company expects net capital expenditures in 2003 for operating equipment and management information systems to be approximately $6.0 million. The Company intends to fund these expenditures through cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under its credit facility, if necessary. The 2003 capital expenditure budget does not include any allocation for acquisitions.

     The Company’s credit facility consists of a working capital line of credit. As long as the Company complies with the financial covenants and ratios, the credit facility permits it to borrow up to $20.0 million less the amount of any outstanding letters of credit. Interest rates for advances under the facility vary based on how the Company’s performance measures against covenants related to total indebtedness, cash flows, results of operations and other ratios. The facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.00% to 1.90%, expires in April 2004 and is unsecured. At December 31, 2002, the Company had $-0- outstanding under the line of credit facility and had utilized $4.0 million of availability for outstanding letters of credit. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants and ratios under the credit facility at December 31, 2002.

     On July 25, 2002, the Company announced that its Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program for up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company expects to fund the repurchases of its common stock from its cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities and cash generated from operating activities. As of December 31, 2002, the Company had repurchased 629,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $12.1 million for an average purchase price of $19.20 per share.

26

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

     The Company’s contractual obligations and other commercial commitments as of December 31, 2002 (in thousands) are summarized below:

     The Company believes that its available cash, cash expected to be generated from future operations and available borrowings under lines of credit, will be sufficient to satisfy anticipated cash needs for at least the next twelve months.

     On January 10, 2000, the Board of Directors approved a three-for-two stock split which was distributed on January 28, 2000. All share, earnings per share, dividends per share, and quarterly stock price data included herein and in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto have been restated to give effect to the stock split.

Related Party Transactions

     Transactions with Landair Corporation

     On July 9, 1998, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized the separation of the Company into two publicly-held corporations (the “Spin-off”), one owning and operating the deferred air freight operations (which continued to be listed as Forward Air) and the other owning and operating the truckload operations (which became Landair Corporation (“Landair”)). The Spin-off was effected on September 23, 1998, through the distribution to shareholders of the Company of all of the outstanding shares of common stock of Landair, on a pro rata basis. Both companies continue to share the same majority shareholder, Scott M. Niswonger, who also serves as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of both companies. The companies also share the same Senior Vice President and General Counsel.

     Disclosures regarding amounts charged to Landair and amounts charged by Landair to the Company for various operational and administrative services are set forth in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.

     The Company purchased $1.6 million, $1.7 million and $2.2 million of truckload transportation services from Landair in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, which have been included in purchased transportation in the consolidated statements of income.

27

Table of Contents

     Transactions with Sky Night, LLC

     The Company purchases air transportation services from Sky Night, LLC (“Sky Night”), a limited liability corporation owned by the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The air charter expense totaled $264,000, $269,000 and $185,000 in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, and has been included in other operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income. In addition, the Company paid salaries and benefits of $-0-, $104,000 and $130,000 for two pilots of the limited liability corporation during 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, which was included in salaries, wages and benefits in the consolidated statements of income.

     During 2001, the Company entered into an agreement to sublease hangar space at its Greeneville, Tennessee headquarters to Sky Night. The initial term of the sublease was for 12 months, with a one-year renewal option, and the monthly rental rate was determined based on market prices for similar spaces in the area. During 2002, Sky Night exercised its one year renewal option on the space.

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, issued in December 2002, which amends SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, provides an alternative method of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require more prominent and more frequent disclosures in financial statements about the effects of stock-based compensation. The transition provisions of SFAS No. 148 are effective for financial reports containing financial statements for years ending after December 15, 2002, while certain additional disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 148 are effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company has elected to account for its stock-based compensation plans under the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principals Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and does not utilize the fair value method. However, the Company has adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 and has adopted the additional disclosure requirements as specified in SFAS No. 148 in fiscal 2002.

     SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, issued in June 2002, requires that a liability for the cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. SFAS No. 146 also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The provisions of this Statement are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company expects that the adoption of SFAS No. 146 during 2003 will not materially impact the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

     SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections, issued in April 2002, among other things, rescinds SFAS No. 4 which required material gains and losses from extinguishment of debt to be classified

28

Table of Contents

as an extraordinary item, net of related income tax effect. SFAS No. 145 requires that extinguishment gains or losses be classified as ordinary gains and losses, and that all such gains or losses in prior periods be reclassified to ordinary gains and losses in comparative financial statements. SFAS No. 145, which applies to all entities, is effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. The Company adopted early SFAS No. 145 as of January 1, 2002. Accordingly, the loss on the early extinguishment of the Columbus Hub facility capital lease of $456,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002 is included in other expense in the consolidated statements of income.

     SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, issued in October 2001, addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 144, which applies to all entities, is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 had no impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

     SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, issued in June 2001, addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and for the associated retirement costs. SFAS No. 143, which applies to all entities that have a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets, is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The adoption of SFAS No. 143 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

     SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, was issued in 2001 and is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Under the new rules in SFAS No. 142, goodwill is no longer amortized but is subject to annual impairment tests in accordance with the Statement. Other intangible assets will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 effective January 1, 2002. The Company completed the initial step of the transitional impairment test of goodwill during the second quarter of 2002 and determined that goodwill had not been impaired. Any subsequent impairment losses will be reflected as a component of income from operations in the consolidated statements of income. Had the Company been accounting for its goodwill under SFAS No. 142 for all periods presented, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been as follows:

29

Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements

     This report contains statements with respect to the Company’s beliefs and expectations of the outcomes of future events that are forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Written forward-looking statements may appear in documents filed with the SEC, in press releases and in reports to shareholders. Oral forward-looking statements may be made by the Company’s executive officers and directors on behalf of the Company to the press, potential investors, securities analysts and others. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 contains a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. The Company relies on this safe harbor in making such disclosures. In connection with this safe harbor provision, the Company is hereby identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company in this report. Without limitation, factors that might cause such a difference include economic factors such as recessions, inflation, higher interest rates and downturns in customer business cycles, fears over the threat of, and actual occurrence of, war and terrorism, the Company’s inability to maintain its historical growth rate because of a decreased volume of freight moving through the Company’s network, increasing competition and pricing pressure, surplus inventories, loss of a major customer, the creditworthiness of the Company’s customers and their ability to pay for services rendered, the Company’s ability to secure terminal facilities in desirable locations at reasonable rates, the inability of the Company’s information systems to handle an increased volume of freight moving through its network, changes in fuel prices, employment matters including rising health care costs, enforcement of and changes in governmental regulations, environmental and tax matters, the handling of hazardous materials, and the availability and compensation of qualified independent owner-operators needed to serve the Company’s transportation needs. As a result of the foregoing, no assurance can be given as to future financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,” and similar expressions. The Company does not undertake any obligation to update or to release publicly any revisions to forward-looking statements contained in this

30

Table of Contents

report to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     On May 4, 1999, the Company sold 1.5 million shares of its common stock in a public offering. The net proceeds of $18.0 million were used principally to repay outstanding debt. With this repayment, the Company’s exposure to market risk related to its remaining outstanding debt is not significant.

     The Company is also exposed to changes in interest rates from its available-for-sale investments. As a result of the short-term maturity of the investments owned by the Company, a material adverse effect to the fair market value of the investments is unlikely.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

     The response to this item is submitted as a separate section of this report.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

     None.

31

Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

     The information required by this item with respect to directors of the Company is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s proxy statement for its 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “2003 Proxy Statement”). The 2003 Proxy Statement will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2002.

     Pursuant to Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K, the information required by this item with respect to executive officers of the Company is set forth in Part I of this report.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 2003 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2002.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

     The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 2003 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2002.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

     The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the 2003 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2002.

ITEM 14. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

     Within 90 days of the filing of this report the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, have evaluated the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13(a)-14(c) and have determined that such controls and procedures are effective. The design of any system of controls and procedures is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. There can be no assurance that

32

Table of Contents

any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Changes in Internal Controls

     There have been no significant changes (including corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies or material weaknesses) in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation referred to in the paragraph above.

33

Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

34

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Forward Air Corporation has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

35

Table of Contents

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Scott M. Niswonger, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Forward Air Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

36

Table of Contents

6.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

37

Table of Contents

I, Andrew C. Clarke, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Forward Air Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

     c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect

38

Table of Contents

internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

39

Table of Contents

Annual Report on Form 10-K

Item 8, Item 15(a)(1) and (2), (c) and (d)

List of Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Certain Exhibits

Financial Statement Schedule

Year Ended December 31, 2002

Forward Air Corporation

Greeneville, Tennessee

Table of Contents

Forward Air Corporation

Form 10-K — Item 8 and Item 15(a)(1) and (2)

Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule

The following consolidated financial statements of Forward Air Corporation are included as a separate section of this report:

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted.

F-2

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Auditors

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Forward Air Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Forward Air Corporation as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Forward Air Corporation at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, in fiscal 2002 the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill.

F-3

Table of Contents

Forward Air Corporation

Consolidated Balance Sheets

F-4

Table of Contents

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

Forward Air Corporation

Consolidated Statements of Income