UNITED STATES
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
||
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 | ||
or | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission File Number: 1-13625
EOP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Delaware | 36-4156801 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
Two North Riverside Plaza, Suite 2100, Chicago, Illinois (Address of principal executive offices) |
60606 (Zip code) |
(312) 466-3300
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o
On October 29, 2004, 450,849,770 Units were outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Financial Statements. |
EOP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||||
Investments in real estate
|
$ | 24,961,031 | $ | 23,985,839 | ||||||||
Developments in process
|
68,352 | 75,232 | ||||||||||
Land available for development
|
256,560 | 251,151 | ||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation
|
(3,063,673 | ) | (2,578,082 | ) | ||||||||
Investments in real estate, net of accumulated
depreciation
|
22,222,270 | 21,734,140 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
122,760 | 69,398 | ||||||||||
Tenant and other receivables (net of allowance
for doubtful accounts of $9,983 and $6,490, respectively)
|
67,077 | 79,880 | ||||||||||
Deferred rent receivable
|
462,810 | 379,329 | ||||||||||
Escrow deposits and restricted cash
|
75,543 | 75,186 | ||||||||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
1,178,965 | 1,127,232 | ||||||||||
Deferred financing costs (net of accumulated
amortization of $61,335 and $48,176, respectively)
|
63,463 | 64,337 | ||||||||||
Deferred leasing costs and other related
intangibles (net of accumulated amortization of $201,531 and
$157,445, respectively)
|
412,352 | 314,568 | ||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets (net of
discounts of $2,382 and $66,200, respectively)
|
171,252 | 344,940 | ||||||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 24,776,492 | $ | 24,189,010 | ||||||||
Liabilities, Minority Interests, Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Units and Partners Capital: | ||||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
||||||||||||
Mortgage debt (including a net (discount) of
$(13,820) and $(13,663), respectively)
|
$ | 2,619,387 | $ | 2,315,889 | ||||||||
Unsecured notes (including a net
(discount) premium of $(34,661) and $12,412, respectively)
|
8,968,751 | 8,828,912 | ||||||||||
Lines of credit
|
1,086,400 | 334,000 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
458,926 | 573,069 | ||||||||||
Distribution payable
|
230,828 | 3,899 | ||||||||||
Other liabilities (including a net
(discount) of $(29,271) and $0, respectively)
|
455,226 | 398,273 | ||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
| | ||||||||||
Total Liabilities
|
13,819,518 | 12,454,042 | ||||||||||
Minority interests partially owned
properties
|
183,548 | 183,863 | ||||||||||
Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Units:
|
||||||||||||
5.25% Series B Convertible, Cumulative
Redeemable Preferred Units, liquidation preference
$50.00 per unit, 5,990,000 issued and outstanding
|
299,500 | 299,500 | ||||||||||
Partners Capital:
|
||||||||||||
Preferred Units, 100,000,000 authorized:
|
||||||||||||
8.625% Series C Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Units, liquidation preference $25.00 per unit, 0
and 4,562,900 issued and outstanding
|
| 114,073 | ||||||||||
7.75% Series G Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Units, liquidation preference $25.00 per unit,
8,500,000 issued and outstanding
|
212,500 | 212,500 | ||||||||||
Other Partners Capital:
|
||||||||||||
General Partners Capital
|
78,280 | 85,086 | ||||||||||
Limited Partners Capital
|
10,251,085 | 10,855,488 | ||||||||||
Deferred compensation
|
(3,247 | ) | (5,889 | ) | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (net of
accumulated amortization of $3,430 and $(73), respectively)
|
(64,692 | ) | (9,653 | ) | ||||||||
Total Partners Capital
|
10,473,926 | 11,251,605 | ||||||||||
Total Liabilities, Minority Interests,
Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Units and Partners Capital
|
$ | 24,776,492 | $ | 24,189,010 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes.
2
EOP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Rental
|
$ | 634,008 | $ | 621,467 | $ | 1,895,218 | $ | 1,868,783 | |||||||||||
Tenant reimbursements
|
108,747 | 104,841 | 319,018 | 312,597 | |||||||||||||||
Parking
|
29,316 | 27,866 | 87,451 | 82,393 | |||||||||||||||
Other
|
15,427 | 21,917 | 54,855 | 55,529 | |||||||||||||||
Fee income
|
3,220 | 1,969 | 10,129 | 10,431 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
790,718 | 778,060 | 2,366,671 | 2,329,733 | |||||||||||||||
Expenses:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation
|
170,725 | 157,388 | 507,736 | 464,406 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization
|
19,137 | 15,488 | 55,232 | 44,410 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate taxes
|
94,275 | 83,670 | 277,923 | 260,898 | |||||||||||||||
Insurance
|
8,853 | 7,651 | 27,417 | 19,654 | |||||||||||||||
Repairs and maintenance
|
87,255 | 78,717 | 249,773 | 235,036 | |||||||||||||||
Property operating
|
111,482 | 107,909 | 319,247 | 305,279 | |||||||||||||||
Ground rent
|
5,531 | 5,534 | 15,927 | 15,000 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate general and administrative
|
13,190 | 13,515 | 38,208 | 44,672 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment
|
229,170 | | 229,170 | | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses
|
739,618 | 469,872 | 1,720,633 | 1,389,355 | |||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
51,100 | 308,188 | 646,038 | 940,378 | |||||||||||||||
Other income (expense):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
1,811 | 3,380 | 5,540 | 10,273 | |||||||||||||||
Realized gain on settlement of derivatives and
sale of marketable securities
|
4,737 | 307 | 28,753 | 8,450 | |||||||||||||||
Interest:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Expense incurred
|
(207,710 | ) | (206,253 | ) | (622,025 | ) | (617,864 | ) | |||||||||||
Amortization of deferred financing costs and
prepayment expenses
|
(2,751 | ) | (1,652 | ) | (7,099 | ) | (5,435 | ) | |||||||||||
Total other income (expense)
|
(203,913 | ) | (204,218 | ) | (594,831 | ) | (604,576 | ) | |||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes, allocation to
minority interests, income from investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures and gain on sale of real estate
|
(152,813 | ) | 103,970 | 51,207 | 335,802 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
(1,135 | ) | 289 | (2,227 | ) | (2,281 | ) | ||||||||||||
Minority interests partially owned
properties
|
(2,219 | ) | (1,816 | ) | (7,126 | ) | (6,163 | ) | |||||||||||
Income from investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
15,145 | 21,208 | 45,602 | 62,918 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate
|
216 | | 216 | | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
(140,806 | ) | 123,651 | 87,672 | 390,276 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations (including net gain
(loss) on sales of real estate of $3,016, ($6,326), $7,138, and
$45,399, respectively)
|
4,899 | 10,672 | 17,724 | 102,322 | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income before cumulative effect of a
change in accounting principle
|
(135,907 | ) | 134,323 | 105,396 | 492,598 | ||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
| | (33,697 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
(135,907 | ) | 134,323 | 71,699 | 492,598 | ||||||||||||||
Preferred distributions
|
(8,701 | ) | (10,508 | ) | (30,393 | ) | (41,364 | ) | |||||||||||
Net (loss) income available to unitholders
|
$ | (144,608 | ) | $ | 123,815 | $ | 41,306 | $ | 451,234 | ||||||||||
(Loss) earnings per unit
basic:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations per unit
|
$ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income available to unitholders per
unit
|
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 1.00 | ||||||||||
Weighted average Units outstanding
|
448,766,905 | 446,750,227 | 448,900,112 | 451,731,474 | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) earnings per unit
diluted:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations per unit
|
$ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.77 | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income available to unitholders per
unit
|
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 1.00 | ||||||||||
Weighted average Units outstanding and dilutive
potential units
|
448,766,905 | 448,805,388 | 450,801,177 | 453,451,913 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions declared per Unit
outstanding
|
$ | 0.50 | $ | 0.50 | $ | 1.50 | $ | 1.50 | |||||||||||
See accompanying notes.
3
EOP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the | For the | ||||||||||||||||
three months ended | nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | (135,907 | ) | $ | 134,323 | $ | 71,699 | $ | 492,598 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|||||||||||||||||
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on forward
starting interest rate swaps
|
| 41,747 | (22,569 | ) | (14,156 | ) | |||||||||||
Reversal of unrealized holding loss on settlement
of forward starting interest rate swap
|
| | 33,017 | 5,942 | |||||||||||||
(Payments) proceeds from settlement of forward
starting interest rate swaps
|
| | (68,918 | ) | 768 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of payments/(proceeds) from
settlement of forward starting interest rate swaps
|
1,704 | (19 | ) | 3,503 | (54 | ) | |||||||||||
Unrealized holding (losses) gains from
investments arising during the period
|
(18 | ) | 680 | (42 | ) | 892 | |||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for realized gains
included in net (loss) income
|
(31 | ) | (307 | ) | (31 | ) | (307 | ) | |||||||||
Net comprehensive (loss) income
|
$ | (134,252 | ) | $ | 176,424 | $ | 16,659 | $ | 485,683 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes.
4
EOP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the three months | For the nine months | |||||||||||||||||||
ended September 30, | ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | (135,907 | ) | $ | 134,323 | $ | 71,699 | $ | 492,598 | |||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Expense (revenue) recognized related to
acquired lease obligations, net
|
506 | 105 | 1,263 | 105 | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of discounts included in interest
and dividend income
|
(81 | ) | (89 | ) | (259 | ) | (268 | ) | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (including
discontinued operations)
|
193,844 | 180,962 | 576,901 | 535,459 | ||||||||||||||||
Ineffective portion of swap settlement payment
included in interest expense
|
| | 212 | | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of (premiums) discounts on
unsecured notes and settled interest rate protection agreements
included in interest expense
|
(140 | ) | (4,600 | ) | (3,576 | ) | (14,898 | ) | ||||||||||||
Compensation expense related to restricted shares
and stock options issued to employees by Equity Office
|
3,840 | 3,404 | 14,085 | 12,840 | ||||||||||||||||
Income from investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
(15,145 | ) | (21,208 | ) | (45,602 | ) | (62,918 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net distributions from unconsolidated
joint ventures
|
24,689 | 22,942 | 53,695 | 62,567 | ||||||||||||||||
Net (gain) loss on sales of real estate
(including discontinued operations)
|
(3,232 | ) | 6,326 | (7,354 | ) | (45,399 | ) | |||||||||||||
Gain on sale of investment in CT Convertible
Trust I preferred shares
|
(2,302 | ) | | (2,302 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Impairment
|
229,170 | | 229,170 | | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
| | 33,697 | | ||||||||||||||||
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
2,608 | (356 | ) | 3,347 | 11,082 | |||||||||||||||
Income allocated to minority interests
|
2,219 | 1,821 | 7,346 | 6,188 | ||||||||||||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Decrease (increase) in rents receivables
|
5,634 | 836 | 16,714 | (7,503 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(Increase) in deferred rent receivables
|
(18,514 | ) | (26,243 | ) | (69,420 | ) | (55,855 | ) | ||||||||||||
Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets
|
21,655 | 34,629 | 71,568 | 42,310 | ||||||||||||||||
(Decrease) in accounts payable and accrued
expenses
|
(9,480 | ) | (33,294 | ) | (67,395 | ) | (40,064 | ) | ||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
|
1,042 | 9,869 | (18,972 | ) | (6,339 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
300,406 | 309,427 | 864,817 | 929,905 | ||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Property acquisitions
|
(219,110 | ) | (87,411 | ) | (338,591 | ) | (87,411 | ) | ||||||||||||
Property dispositions
|
(1,578 | ) | 133,382 | 231,891 | 398,979 | |||||||||||||||
Capital and tenant improvements
|
(91,969 | ) | (127,160 | ) | (335,322 | ) | (302,080 | ) | ||||||||||||
Lease commissions and other costs
|
(33,127 | ) | (36,020 | ) | (94,002 | ) | (110,069 | ) | ||||||||||||
Sale of investment in CT Convertible Trust I
preferred shares
|
32,089 | | 32,089 | | ||||||||||||||||
Decrease (increase) in escrow deposits and
restricted cash
|
36,212 | (10,123 | ) | 83,423 | 4,709 | |||||||||||||||
(Investments in) distributions from
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
(220,833 | ) | 57,981 | (220,833 | ) | 25,963 | ||||||||||||||
Investments in notes receivable
|
| | | (96 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Repayments of notes receivable
|
| | | 1,395 | ||||||||||||||||
Net cash (used for) investing activities
|
(498,316 | ) | (69,351 | ) | (641,345 | ) | (68,610 | ) | ||||||||||||
Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Principal payments on mortgage debt
|
(219,132 | ) | (121,876 | ) | (428,371 | ) | (142,821 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from unsecured notes
|
17,386 | | 1,057,661 | 494,810 | ||||||||||||||||
Repayment of unsecured notes
|
(30,000 | ) | | (880,000 | ) | (300,000 | ) | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from lines of credit
|
2,061,500 | 1,861,200 | 4,947,500 | 3,577,600 | ||||||||||||||||
Repayment of lines of credit
|
(1,351,400 | ) | (1,723,100 | ) | (4,195,100 | ) | (3,362,300 | ) | ||||||||||||
Payments of loan costs
|
| | (1,506 | ) | (8,548 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Settlement of interest rate swap agreements
|
| | (69,130 | ) | 768 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions to minority interests in partially
owned properties
|
(2,180 | ) | (2,265 | ) | (17,671 | ) | (7,948 | ) | ||||||||||||
Payment of offering costs
|
(13 | ) | (31 | ) | (55 | ) | (194 | ) | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
4,307 | 13,022 | 44,110 | 20,649 | ||||||||||||||||
Distributions to unitholders
|
(224,035 | ) | (224,377 | ) | (449,279 | ) | (453,060 | ) | ||||||||||||
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures
related to a debt refinancing
|
| 29,512 | | 29,512 | ||||||||||||||||
Cancellation of Units through Equity
Offices repurchase of Common Shares
|
(360 | ) | (10,042 | ) | (36,943 | ) | (363,486 | ) | ||||||||||||
Redemption of Units
|
(668 | ) | (3,421 | ) | (2,534 | ) | (5,630 | ) | ||||||||||||
Redemption of preferred units
|
| | (114,073 | ) | (250,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Payment of preferred distributions
|
(8,048 | ) | (10,508 | ) | (24,719 | ) | (43,333 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used for) financing
activities
|
247,357 | (191,886 | ) | (170,110 | ) | (813,981 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
49,447 | 48,190 | 53,362 | 47,314 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the
period
|
73,313 | 57,595 | 69,398 | 58,471 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
$ | 122,760 | $ | 105,785 | $ | 122,760 | $ | 105,785 | ||||||||||||
5
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
For the three months | For the nine months | ||||||||||||||||||
ended September 30, | ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Supplemental Information:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest paid during the period, including a
reduction of interest expense for capitalized interest of $767,
$2,218, $4,429 and $7,017, respectively
|
$ | 261,512 | $ | 254,687 | $ | 676,483 | $ | 675,424 | |||||||||||
Non-Cash Investing and Financing
Activities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Investing Activities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Escrow deposits used for property acquisitions
|
$ | 35,891 | $ | | $ | 35,891 | $ | | |||||||||||
Escrow deposits related to property dispositions
|
$ | (71,893 | ) | $ | | $ | (102,509 | ) | $ | (19,339 | ) | ||||||||
Mortgage loan repayment as a result of a property
disposition (including prepayment expense of $375 in the nine
months ended September 30, 2004)
|
$ | | $ | | $ | (5,830 | ) | $ | (16,279 | ) | |||||||||
Mortgage loan assumed upon acquisition of property
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 82,970 | $ | | |||||||||||
Mortgage loan assumed upon consolidation of
property
|
$ | | $ | 59,166 | $ | | $ | 59,166 | |||||||||||
Units issued in connection with property
acquisition
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 50 | $ | | |||||||||||
Changes in accounts due to a like-kind exchange:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Increase in investment in real estate due to
property acquisition
|
$ | 130,203 | $ | | $ | 130,203 | $ | | |||||||||||
Decrease in investment in real estate due to
property disposition
|
$ | (130,865 | ) | $ | | $ | (130,865 | ) | $ | | |||||||||
Decrease in accumulated depreciation
|
$ | 9,137 | $ | | $ | 9,137 | $ | | |||||||||||
Decrease in other assets and liabilities
|
$ | (1,770 | ) | $ | | $ | (1,770 | ) | $ | | |||||||||
Changes in accounts due to consolidation of
existing interest in a property as a result of acquiring the
remaining economic interest:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Decrease in investment in unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
$ | | $ | | $ | (157,659 | ) | $ | | ||||||||||
Increase in investment in real estate
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 612,411 | $ | | |||||||||||
Increase in accumulated depreciation
|
$ | | $ | | $ | (44,440 | ) | $ | | ||||||||||
Increase in mortgage debt
|
$ | | $ | | $ | (451,285 | ) | $ | | ||||||||||
Increase in other assets and liabilities
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 40,973 | $ | | |||||||||||
Financing Activities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage loan repayment as a result of a property
disposition (including prepayment expense of $375 in the nine
months ended September 30, 2004)
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 5,830 | $ | 16,279 | |||||||||||
Mortgage loan assumed upon consolidation of
property
|
$ | | $ | (59,166 | ) | $ | | $ | (59,166 | ) | |||||||||
6
EOP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) rules and regulations. The following notes, which present interim disclosures as required by the SEC, highlight significant changes to the notes to our December 31, 2003 audited consolidated financial statements and should be read together with the financial statements and notes thereto included in our Form 10-K.
NOTE 1 | BUSINESS OF EOP PARTNERSHIP |
EOP Operating Limited Partnership (EOP Partnership) is a Delaware limited partnership. Our general partner is Equity Office Properties Trust (Equity Office), a Maryland real estate investment trust (REIT). The use of the word we, us, or our refers to EOP Partnership, its subsidiaries and Equity Office, except where the context otherwise requires. Equity Office has elected to be taxed as a REIT for federal income tax purposes and generally will not be subject to federal income tax if it distributes 100% of its taxable income and complies with a number of organizational requirements.
We are a fully integrated, self-administered and self-managed real estate company principally engaged, through our subsidiaries, in owning, managing, leasing, acquiring and developing office properties. At September 30, 2004, we owned or had an interest in 701 office properties comprising approximately 125.5 million rentable square feet of office space in 18 states and the District of Columbia and were located in 27 markets and 124 submarkets (the Office Properties). On a weighted average basis, the Office Properties were 86.7% occupied at September 30, 2004. Approximately 41.5% of the rentable square feet is located in central business districts and approximately 58.5% of the rentable square feet is located in suburban markets. At September 30, 2004, we also owned eight industrial properties comprising approximately 0.9 million square feet of industrial space (the Industrial Properties and together with the Office Properties, the Properties) and approximately 0.3 million rentable square feet of office properties under development. On a weighted average basis, the Industrial Properties were 85.8% occupied at September 30, 2004.
NOTE 2 | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation |
The consolidated financial statements represent our financial condition and results of operations and those of our subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Property holding entities and other subsidiaries of which we own 100% of the equity or receive all of the economics are consolidated. For those joint ventures of which we own less than 100% of the equity interest, we consolidate the property if we receive substantially all of the economics or have the direct or indirect ability to make major decisions. Major decisions are defined in the respective joint venture agreements and generally include participating and protective rights such as decisions regarding major leases, encumbering the entities with debt and whether to dispose of the entities. We would also consolidate certain property holding entities and other subsidiaries that we own less than a 100% equity interest if the entity is a variable interest entity and we are the primary beneficiary (as defined in FASB Interpretation 46(R) Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of ARB No. 51, as revised (FIN 46(R))).
In May 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement No. 150 Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (FAS 150). FAS 150 establishes standards for classifying and measuring as liabilities certain financial instruments that embody obligations of the issuer and have characteristics of both liabilities and equity. FAS 150 is effective for all financial instruments created or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003 (July 1, 2003 for calendar quarter companies). On November 7, 2003, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 150-3, which deferred for an indefinite period the classification and measurement provisions, but not the disclosure provisions, of FAS 150 as it relates to noncontrolling interests that are classified as equity in the financial statements of a subsidiary but would be classified as a liability in the parents financial statements under FAS 150 (e.g., minority interests in consolidated limited-life subsidiaries).
7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
We are presently the controlling partner in various consolidated entities having a minority interest book value of approximately $100.5 million at September 30, 2004. The organizational documents of these entities contain provisions that require the entities to be liquidated through the sales of their assets upon reaching the future date specified in each respective agreement. As controlling partner, we have an obligation to cause these property owning entities to distribute proceeds of liquidation to the minority interests in these partially owned properties only if the net proceeds received by the entities from the sale of its assets warrant a distribution based on the agreements. As of September 30, 2004, we estimate the value of minority interest distributions would have been approximately $150 million (Settlement Value) had the entities been liquidated as of that date. This Settlement Value is based on the estimated third party consideration realizable by the entities upon a hypothetical disposition of the partially owned properties and is net of all other assets and liabilities, including yield maintenance on any mortgages encumbering the properties, that would have been due on September 30, 2004 had those mortgages been prepaid. The amount of any potential distribution to minority interest holders in our partially owned properties is very difficult to predict due to many factors, including the inherent uncertainty of real estate sales. If the entities underlying assets are worth less than the underlying liabilities, we have no obligation to remit any consideration to the minority interest holders in partially owned properties.
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Unaudited Interim Statements |
The consolidated financial statements as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and related footnote disclosures are unaudited. In the opinion of management, such financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results of the interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.
Reclassifications |
Certain reclassifications have been made to the previously reported 2003 statements in order to provide comparability with the 2004 statements reported herein. These reclassifications have not changed the 2003 results of operations or partners capital.
Share Based Employee Compensation Plans |
Prior to January 1, 2003, we used the accounting provisions provided by Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (APB 25) to account for the issuance of share options and other equity awards. Effective January 1, 2003, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (FAS 123) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which requires a fair value based accounting method for determining compensation expense associated with the issuance of share options and other equity awards. We adopted the accounting provisions of FAS 123 to reflect the cost of issuing share options and other equity awards and use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value share options. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148 (FAS 148) Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, issued December 2002 and effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002, provided various methods of applying FAS 123. In accordance with FAS 148, we employed the prospective method for adopting FAS 123, which requires the recognition of compensation expense based on the fair value method for share options and other equity awards granted on or after January 1, 2003 and for certain modifications made subsequent to December 31, 2002 to share options and other equity awards that were outstanding as of December 31, 2002. Compensation expense is recognized ratably over the respective vesting period of the award.
8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table illustrates the unaudited effect on net (loss) income available to unitholders and (loss) earnings per unit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 if the fair value based method had been applied to all share options that have been issued. Compensation expense related to restricted share awards is not presented in the table below because the expense amount is the same under APB 25 and FAS 123 and therefore, is already reflected in net (loss) income.
For the | For the | ||||||||||||||||
three months ended | nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit data) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
Historical net (loss) income available to
unitholders
|
$ | (144,608 | ) | $ | 123,815 | $ | 41,306 | $ | 451,234 | ||||||||
Add back compensation expense for share options
included in historical net (loss) income available to unitholders
|
1,208 | 626 | 4,069 | 2,001 | |||||||||||||
Deduct compensation expense for share options
determined under fair value based method
|
(2,226 | ) | (2,595 | ) | (7,403 | ) | (8,040 | ) | |||||||||
Pro forma net (loss) income available to
unitholders
|
$ | (145,626 | ) | $ | 121,846 | $ | 37,972 | $ | 445,195 | ||||||||
(Loss) earnings per unit basic:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Historical net (loss) income available to
unitholders per unit
|
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 1.00 | ||||||||
Pro forma net (loss) income available to
unitholders per unit
|
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.99 | ||||||||
(Loss) earnings per unit diluted:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Historical net (loss) income available to
unitholders per unit
|
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 1.00 | ||||||||
Pro forma net (loss) income available to
unitholders per unit
|
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.08 | $ | 0.98 | ||||||||
NOTE 3 | ACQUISITIONS |
In September 2004, we acquired Commerce Plaza in Oak Brook, Illinois and Redstone Plaza in Newport Beach, California, in a like-kind exchange transaction in which we disposed of certain industrial properties (see Note 4 Discontinued Operations). Commerce Plaza consists of three office buildings comprising approximately 510,757 square feet and Redstone Plaza consists of two office buildings comprising approximately 166,562 square feet.
In September 2004, we acquired 5800 & 6000 Meadows, which consists of two office buildings comprising approximately 198,347 square feet in Lake Oswego, Oregon, for a purchase price of approximately $49.0 million.
In September 2004, we acquired Olympus Corporate Centre, which consists of four office buildings comprising approximately 191,494 square feet in Roseville, California, for a purchase price of approximately $37.9 million.
In September 2004, we, together with an unaffiliated party, acquired 717 Fifth Avenue located in New York, New York for a purchase price of approximately $353.0 million. This property consists of both office and retail space. We acquired all of the office space, except for the fourth floor, for approximately $160.5 million. An unaffiliated party acquired all of the retail space and the fourth floor office space. The office space we acquired comprises approximately 323,984 square feet.
In September 2004, we, together with a joint venture partner, acquired a vacant land parcel in Herndon, Virginia for a purchase price of approximately $10.9 million. The purchase price was paid with cash and a $2.7 million note that is
9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
payable on the date that construction commences on the land. We are a 70% partner in the joint venture and have control over major decisions. Accordingly, we consolidate the joint venture.
In May 2004, we acquired a partners interest in the 500 Orange office property by issuing 1,930 Units which were valued at approximately $50,000.
In May 2004, we acquired American Center, which consists of two office buildings, for approximately $60.5 million. The office property is located in Tysons Corner, Virginia and consists of approximately 328,741 square feet.
In February 2004, we acquired one of our joint venture partners 15.53% economic interest in the 1301 Avenue of the Americas office building for approximately $60.7 million and we assumed our partners share of the mortgage notes of approximately $83.0 million. Our economic interest in the joint venture is now 100%, and we control all major decisions. Accordingly, we have consolidated the property. The consolidated mortgage debt encumbering this property upon consolidation was approximately $534.3 million. In addition, we acquired another joint venture partners interest for approximately $7.5 million.
The allocations of the purchase price and other costs related to the acquisitions to tangible and intangible assets are based on managements current best estimate, and are subject to adjustment within one year of the closing date of each respective acquisition.
NOTE 4 | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
In September 2004, we disposed of 29 industrial properties for approximately $73.3 million in cash (before closing costs) and two office properties valued at approximately $137.0 million for total consideration of approximately $210.3 million (35% monetary/ 65% nonmonetary). The net book value of the industrial properties sold was approximately $198.0 million. This transaction was accounted for as a like-kind exchange transaction involving boot. Because the transaction included a monetary and nonmonetary component, we recognized a gain on sale of approximately $3.6 million on the monetary portion of the transaction. The nonmonetary portion of this transaction yielded no gain or loss. The remaining book value of the industrial properties, or approximately $130.0 million, represents the book value of the two office properties acquired in the transaction. The two office properties acquired are Commerce Plaza and Redstone Plaza, as further described in Note 3 Acquisitions.
During the second quarter 2004, we sold four office properties, 38 industrial properties and a vacant land parcel in various transactions to unaffiliated parties for approximately $255.5 million. The total gain on the sale of these properties was approximately $1.9 million and is included in discontinued operations. The sold office properties consisted of approximately 449,593 square feet, and the industrial properties consisted of approximately 2,275,550 square feet. In connection with the sale of one of the office properties, we repaid approximately $5.8 million of mortgage debt which encumbered the property.
During the first quarter 2004, we sold one office property consisting of approximately 118,172 square feet to an unaffiliated party for approximately $18.5 million. The total gain on the sale of this property was approximately $2.2 million and is included in discontinued operations.
The net income for properties sold is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as discontinued operations for the periods presented. The office properties in which we sold 75% and 80% of our interests during December 2003 are not required to be reflected as discontinued operations in accordance with FAS 144 because we retained an equity interest
10
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
in these Properties. Below is a summary of the results of operations through their respective sale dates for the properties sold, which are classified as discontinued operations:
For the | For the | |||||||||||||||||||
three months ended | nine months ended | |||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
$ | 4,702 | $ | 31,205 | $ | 25,787 | $ | 109,702 | ||||||||||||
Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
1,231 | 6,434 | 6,836 | 21,434 | ||||||||||||||||
Property operating
|
1,588 | 7,639 | 7,470 | 30,912 | ||||||||||||||||
Ground rent
|
| | | 18 | ||||||||||||||||
Total expenses
|
2,819 | 14,073 | 14,306 | 52,364 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
1,883 | 17,132 | 11,481 | 57,338 | ||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense):
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
| 41 | 2 | 109 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense and amortization of deferred
financing costs and prepayment expenses
|
| (157 | ) | (672 | ) | (483 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total other income (expense)
|
| (116 | ) | (670 | ) | (374 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income before income taxes and net gain (loss) on
sales of real estate
|
1,883 | 17,016 | 10,811 | 56,964 | ||||||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
| (13 | ) | (5 | ) | (16 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income allocated to minority
interests partially owned properties
|
| (5 | ) | (220 | ) | (25 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net gain (loss) on sales of real estate
|
3,016 | (6,326 | ) | 7,138 | 45,399 | |||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 4,899 | $ | 10,672 | $ | 17,724 | $ | 102,322 | ||||||||||||
Property net operating income from discontinued
operations
|
$ | 3,114 | $ | 23,566 | $ | 18,317 | $ | 78,790 | ||||||||||||
Segment Reporting |
For segment reporting purposes, the office properties and the land parcels that were sold are included in the Office Properties segment and the industrial properties that were sold are included in the Corporate and Other segment.
NOTE 5 | IMPAIRMENT |
During September 2004, after an in-depth review of our portfolio on an asset-by-asset basis, we reduced our intended holding period for 96 non-core assets comprising approximately 17.7 million square feet. We currently intend to sell these assets over the next five years, as market conditions warrant. Based on our analysis of the future cash flows of each asset over the next five years, we determined that 46 of the assets comprising approximately 2.8 million square feet were permanently impaired. The difference between the fair value (calculated either by discounting estimated future cash flows and sales proceeds or utilizing market comparables) and the net book value was approximately $229.2 million which is reflected as a non-cash impairment charge in the current quarter. All but one of the impaired assets and their respective impairment charges are reported under the Office Properties segment and the remaining asset is reported under the Corporate and Other segment for segment reporting purposes.
11
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 6 | REALIZED GAIN ON SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVES AND SALE OF |
In July 2004, we disposed of the preferred shares we owned of CT Convertible Trust I, of which Mr. Zell (Equity Offices Chairman of the Board of Trustees) is Chairman of the Board, for approximately $32.1 million and recognized a gain of approximately $2.3 million. In addition, we recognized a gain of approximately $2.4 million from the sale of other securities.
In May 2004, we settled $500 million notional amount of forward-starting interest rate swaps and recognized a gain of approximately $24.0 million (see Note 9).
NOTE 7 | INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES |
Several Office Properties are owned by us and other unaffiliated parties in joint ventures which we account for using the equity method. Combined summarized financial information for these unconsolidated joint ventures is as follows:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Balance Sheets:
|
||||||||||
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
|
$ | 2,944,300 | $ | 3,258,009 | ||||||
Other assets
|
332,454 | 339,835 | ||||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 3,276,754 | $ | 3,597,844 | ||||||
Mortgage debt
|
$ | 770,516 | $ | 1,308,782 | ||||||
Other liabilities
|
129,457 | 140,259 | ||||||||
Partners and shareholders equity
|
2,376,781 | 2,148,803 | ||||||||
Total Liabilities and Partners and
Shareholders Equity
|
$ | 3,276,754 | $ | 3,597,844 | ||||||
Our share of equity
|
$ | 1,092,838 | $ | 1,040,373 | ||||||
Net excess of cost of investments over the net
book value of underlying net assets, net of accumulated
depreciation of $24,280 and $24,456, respectively
|
86,127 | 86,859 | ||||||||
Carrying value of investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures
|
$ | 1,178,965 | $ | 1,127,232 | ||||||
Our share including the excess of the cost of the
investment over the historical net book value of:
|
||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 1,563,998 | $ | 1,968,983 | ||||||
Unconsolidated non-recourse mortgage debt
|
$ | 343,769 | $ | 797,268 | ||||||
12
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the | For the | ||||||||||||||||||
three months ended | nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||
Statements of Operations:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 117,458 | $ | 114,126 | $ | 349,609 | $ | 356,161 | |||||||||||
Expenses:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense and loan cost amortization
|
10,922 | 20,473 | 33,111 | 55,443 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
27,330 | 21,432 | 81,174 | 70,141 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
46,762 | 40,435 | 140,260 | 142,443 | |||||||||||||||
Total expenses
|
85,014 | 82,340 | 254,545 | 268,027 | |||||||||||||||
Net income before gain on sale of real estate
|
32,444 | 31,786 | 95,064 | 88,134 | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate
|
| 43,255 | | 43,255 | |||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 32,444 | $ | 75,041 | $ | 95,064 | $ | 131,389 | |||||||||||
Our share of:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 15,145 | $ | 21,208 | $ | 45,602 | $ | 62,918 | |||||||||||
Interest expense and loan cost amortization
|
$ | 4,353 | $ | 12,449 | $ | 16,647 | $ | 37,075 | |||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization (real estate
related)
|
$ | 11,722 | $ | 14,058 | $ | 33,204 | $ | 40,992 | |||||||||||
Investment in Four Oaks |
In September 2004, the Four Oaks office property located in Houston, Texas, in which we owned an approximate 3% interest, was sold. Our share of the net proceeds from the sale was approximately $7.1 million and we recognized a gain from the transaction of approximately $0.2 million. We accounted for our investment under the cost method. As of September 30, 2004, our share of the net proceeds is reflected as a receivable and is included in prepaid expenses and other assets. The receivable was collected in October.
Investment in Colorado Center |
In July 2004, we, together with a joint venture partner, acquired Colorado Center, a six building office complex consisting of approximately 1,091,090 square feet in Santa Monica, California, for a purchase price of approximately $443.6 million. Our share of the purchase price was approximately $221.8 million. We own 50% of the joint venture asset, which we manage and lease, and otherwise, share equally in making major decisions regarding the ownership and operation of the asset. Our investment is accounted for under the equity method.
Investment in 1301 Avenue of the Americas |
In February 2004, we acquired the remaining economic interest in the 1301 Avenue of the Americas office building, which was previously accounted for under the equity method. See Note 3 Acquisitions for more information.
13
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 8 | MORTGAGE DEBT |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the following transactions occurred:
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||
Balance at December 31, 2003(a)
|
$ | 2,329,552 | |||
Repayments and scheduled principal amortization(b)
|
(214,693 | ) | |||
Assumed through acquisition and consolidation of
1301 Avenue of the Americas (See Note 3
Acquisitions)
|
534,255 | ||||
Assumed through consolidation of SunAmerica
Center (See Note 11 Cumulative Effect of a
Change in Accounting Principle)
|
203,225 | ||||
Balance at June 30, 2004(a)
|
2,852,339 | ||||
Repayments and scheduled principal amortization(c)
|
(219,132 | ) | |||
Balance at September 30, 2004(a)
|
$ | 2,633,207 | |||
(a) | Excludes net discount on mortgage debt of approximately $13.8 million, $14.0 million, and $13.7 million at September 30, 2004, June 30, 2004, and December 31, 2003, respectively. | |
(b) | Includes the repayment of approximately $189.7 million of mortgage debt encumbering the following properties: 580 California, BP Tower, 110 Atrium Place, Fremont Bayside, Industrial Drive Warehouse, John Marshall and 125 Perimeter Center. | |
(c) | Includes the repayment of mortgage debt encumbering Worldwide Plaza in the amount of approximately $209.1 million. |
NOTE 9 | UNSECURED NOTES, DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, AND LINES OF CREDIT |
Unsecured Notes Repaid |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004 we repaid the following unsecured notes upon maturity:
Month Repaid | Amount | Coupon Rate | Effective Rate | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||
September
|
$ | 30,000 | 7.24 | % | 7.26 | % | ||||||
June
|
250,000 | 6.50 | % | 5.31 | % | |||||||
May
|
200,000 | 6.80 | % | 6.10 | % | |||||||
January
|
300,000 | 6.50 | % | 4.59 | % | |||||||
January
|
100,000 | 6.90 | % | 6.27 | % | |||||||
$ | 880,000 | |||||||||||
Unsecured Notes Issued |
In June 2004, we launched a new program allowing for the issuance of up to $500 million of unsecured medium-term notes for sale to retail investors through licensed brokers (EOP InterNotes). During the three months ended September 30, 2004, we issued approximately $17.6 million of fixed interest rate EOP InterNotes with coupon rates ranging from 3.70% to 5.15%. Including all offering expenses, the effective rates of the notes issued in the third quarter range from 3.97% to 5.36% and the maturity dates range from three to six and a half years. Since the beginning of the program, we have issued approximately $21.9 million of fixed interest rate EOP InterNotes with coupons ranging from 3.70% to 5.25%. Including all offering expenses, the effective rates of the InterNotes issued range from 3.97% to 5.46% and the maturity dates range from three to six and a half years.
14
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
In May 2004, we issued $45.0 million of unsecured notes due May 2014. The notes bear interest at LIBOR plus 77.5 basis points. The net cash proceeds from the issuance were approximately $44.5 million which were used to repay outstanding balances on the $1.0 billion revolving credit facility.
In March 2004, we issued $1.0 billion of 4.75% unsecured notes due March 2014. The net cash proceeds from the issuance were approximately $991.2 million which were used to repay outstanding balances on the $1.0 billion revolving credit facility. We also paid $69.1 million to settle $800 million of forward-starting interest rate swaps that were previously entered into to hedge the interest rate of the $1.0 billion notes. Approximately $0.2 million of the settlement amount was immediately recognized in interest expense because the hedge was not perfectly effective and the remaining $68.9 million was charged to other comprehensive income. The amount charged to other comprehensive income is being amortized to interest expense over the 10-year term of the notes. Including all offering expenses and the settlement payment of the forward-starting swap agreements, the all-in effective rate of the unsecured notes is 5.54%.
Derivative Financial Instruments |
In May 2004, we settled $500 million notional amount of forward-starting interest rate swaps and recognized a gain of approximately $24.0 million which is included in realized gain on settlement of derivatives and sale of marketable securities. The swaps were entered into in 2003 to hedge an unsecured note offering that was expected to occur in June 2004. The swaps were settled when the anticipated unsecured note offering did not occur.
In conjunction with the $1.0 billion debt offering in March 2004, we entered into $1.0 billion notional amount of fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements that effectively convert the interest rate of the notes to a variable rate of LIBOR plus 43 basis points plus an additional 79 basis points for loan costs. Because these swaps are considered perfect hedges of the notes, they are marked-to-market each quarter with a corresponding mark-to-market adjustment on the notes. The market value of the swaps is reflected in other assets or other liabilities, and the corresponding market value of the notes is reflected as either a discount or premium on the notes. Because the swaps are considered a perfectly effective fair value hedge, there will be no effect on net income from the mark-to-market adjustment.
Lines of Credit |
In July 2004, we obtained a $500 million 364-day bridge revolving credit facility. The credit facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 65 basis points and had an annual facility fee of 15 basis points. The agreement relating to the bridge revolving credit facility contained certain financial restrictions similar to those of our existing line of credit facility. The bridge facility was terminated in October 2004. See Note 15 Subsequent Events.
15
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 10 | PARTNERS CAPITAL AND MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE PREFERRED UNITS |
Units |
The following table presents the changes in the issued and outstanding Units since December 31, 2003:
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
449,492,618 | ||||
Issued to Equity Office related to common shares
issued for share options exercised
|
1,682,409 | ||||
Repurchased/retired (at an average price of
$26.17 per unit for approximately $36.6 million in the
aggregate(a))
|
(1,397,883 | ) | |||
Units redeemed for cash
|
(69,580 | ) | |||
Issued to Equity Office related to restricted
shares and share awards issued, net of cancellations
|
970,658 | ||||
Units issued in connection with property
acquisition (see Note 3)
|
1,930 | ||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2004
|
450,680,152 | ||||
Issued to Equity Office related to common shares
issued for share options exercised
|
191,970 | ||||
Repurchased/retired (at an average price of
$27.84 per unit for approximately $360,000 in the
aggregate(a))
|
(12,944 | ) | |||
Units redeemed for cash
|
(24,519 | ) | |||
Issued to Equity Office related to restricted
shares and share awards issued, net of cancellations
|
(14,123 | ) | |||
Outstanding at September 30, 2004
|
450,820,536 | ||||
(a) | Equity Office common shares of beneficial interest (Common Shares) were repurchased and retired. In connection with the repurchases, we retired a corresponding number of Units for an aggregate purchase price equal to the aggregate purchase price for all Common Share repurchases. |
Distributions |
Quarterly | ||||||||
Distribution | Unitholder | |||||||
Amount Per Unit | Date Paid | Record Date | ||||||
Units
|
$ | .50 | October 15, 2004 | September 30, 2004 | ||||
Series B Preferred Units
|
$ | 0.65625 | August 16, 2004 | August 2, 2004 | ||||
Series G Preferred Units
|
$ | 0.484375 | September 15, 2004 | September 1, 2004 |
Preferred Units |
In January 2004, Equity Office redeemed all of its 4,562,900 outstanding 8 5/8% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Shares of Beneficial Interest. The Series C Preferred Shares were redeemed at a redemption price of $25.00 per share for an aggregate redemption price of approximately $114.1 million. The deferred issuance costs of approximately $4.1 million was reflected as a preferred distribution. In connection with such redemption, we redeemed all of the Series C Preferred Units from Equity Office.
NOTE 11 | CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF A CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE |
Under the provisions of FIN 46(R), which we adopted on January 1, 2004, we consolidated the assets, liabilities and results of operations of SunAmerica Center, an office property located in Century City, California, which comprises approximately 780,063 square feet. We own an approximate 67% share of a $202.2 million mezzanine-level debt position, for which we paid approximately $73.9 million in 1999. As a result of this ownership position, we determined we were the primary beneficiary of this variable interest entity. As of December 31, 2003, this investment was recorded as a note
16
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
receivable and was included in other assets. The note matures in August 2014 and prior to then interest is payable based on available cash flow. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of the investment is equivalent to the $73.9 million we invested in 1999 and an additional $2.5 million which we may be required to loan the entity in the event of a cash shortfall. Our payment recourse is limited to the mezzanine borrowers equity in the property.
As a result of the consolidation of SunAmerica Center, we recorded a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle loss of approximately $33.7 million in the first quarter 2004. The effect on our assets and liabilities as a result of the consolidation of SunAmerica Center as of January 1, 2004 was:
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||
Investment in real estate
|
$ | 330,787 | ||
Accumulated depreciation
|
$ | (31,219 | ) | |
Mortgage debt
|
$ | (203,225 | ) | |
Net other assets and liabilities, including a net
discount of $31,476
|
$ | (130,040 | )(a) |
(a) | As of January 1, 2004, our joint venture partners share of the mezzanine-level debt of approximately $49.7 million is recorded in other liabilities, which is net of a discount of approximately $31.5 million. Interest expense on the approximate $66 million face amount of the joint venture partners debt is accrued at 7.25% per annum and the discount is amortized to interest expense through the maturity of the mezzanine-level loan in 2014. The remaining debt of approximately $15 million does not accrue interest. |
17
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 12 (LOSS) EARNINGS PER UNIT
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per unit:
For the | For the | |||||||||||||||||
three months ended | nine months ended | |||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit data) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
Numerator:
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
$ | (140,806 | ) | $ | 123,651 | $ | 87,672 | $ | 390,276 | |||||||||
Preferred distributions
|
(8,701 | ) | (10,508 | ) | (30,393 | ) | (41,364 | ) | ||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations
available to unitholders
|
(149,507 | ) | 113,143 | 57,279 | 348,912 | |||||||||||||
Discontinued operations (including net gain
(loss) on sales of real estate of $3,016, $(6,326), $7,138 and
$45,399 respectively)
|
4,899 | 10,672 | 17,724 | 102,322 | ||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
| | (33,697 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Numerator for basic and diluted (loss) earnings
per unit net (loss) income available to unitholders
|
$ | (144,608 | ) | $ | 123,815 | $ | 41,306 | $ | 451,234 | |||||||||
Denominator:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic (loss) earnings per
unit weighted average Units outstanding
|
448,766,905 | 446,750,227 | 448,900,112 | 451,731,474 | ||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive potential units:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Units issuable upon exercise of Equity Office
share options and restricted shares
|
| 2,055,161 | 1,901,065 | 1,720,439 | ||||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted (loss) earnings per
unit weighted average Units outstanding and dilutive
potential units
|
448,766,905 | 448,805,388 | 450,801,177 | 453,451,913 | ||||||||||||||
(Loss) earnings per unit
basic:
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations
available to unitholders
|
$ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.77 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
| | (0.08 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income available to unitholders(a)
|
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 1.00 | |||||||||
(Loss) earnings per unit
diluted:
|
||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations
available to unitholders
|
$ | (0.33 | ) | $ | 0.25 | $ | 0.13 | $ | 0.77 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
0.01 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.23 | ||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
| | (0.07 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income available to unitholders(a)
|
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 1.00 | |||||||||
(a) | Net (loss) income available to unitholders per unit may not total the sum of the per unit components due to rounding. |
18
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following securities were not included in the diluted (loss) earnings per unit computation because they would have had an antidilutive effect:
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
Antidilutive Securities | Exercise Price | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Share options
|
$ | 27.57 | 22,359,571 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Share options
|
$ | 29.25 | | 13,140,521 | | | |||||||||||||||
Share options
|
$ | 29.14 | | | 15,115,409 | | |||||||||||||||
Share options
|
$ | 29.26 | | | | 13,466,685 | |||||||||||||||
Series B Preferred Units
|
$ | 35.70 | 8,389,354 | 8,389,354 | 8,389,354 | 8,389,354 | |||||||||||||||
Restricted shares
|
$ | 27.22 | 1,968,060 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
32,716,985 | 21,529,875 | 23,504,763 | 21,856,039 | |||||||||||||||||
NOTE 13 | SEGMENT INFORMATION |
As discussed in Note 1, our primary business is the ownership and operation of Office Properties. We account for each Office Property as an individual operating segment and have aggregated the related operating accounts into a single operating segment for financial reporting purposes due to the fact that the individual operating segments have similar economic characteristics. The net property operating income from continuing operations generated at the Corporate and Other segment consist primarily of the Industrial Properties. The Other revenues generated at the Corporate and Other segment consist primarily of fee income from the management of office properties owned by third parties, interest and dividend income from various investments and realized gains on settlement of derivatives and sale of marketable securities.
19
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the three months ended | For the three months ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2004 | September 30, 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office | Corporate | Office | Corporate | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Properties | and Other | Consolidated | Properties | and Other | Consolidated | |||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating revenues(1)
|
$ | 786,500 | $ | 998 | $ | 787,498 | $ | 774,902 | $ | 1,189 | $ | 776,091 | |||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses(2)
|
(301,554 | ) | (311 | ) | (301,865 | ) | (277,679 | ) | (268 | ) | (277,947 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Property net operating income from continuing
operations
|
484,946 | 687 | 485,633 | 497,223 | 921 | 498,144 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to arrive at net income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenues
|
1,315 | 8,453 | 9,768 | 2,086 | 3,570 | 5,656 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense(3)
|
(53,106 | ) | (157,355 | ) | (210,461 | ) | (44,265 | ) | (163,640 | ) | (207,905 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
(185,584 | ) | (4,278 | ) | (189,862 | ) | (169,555 | ) | (3,321 | ) | (172,876 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Ground rent
|
(5,531 | ) | | (5,531 | ) | (5,534 | ) | | (5,534 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
| (13,190 | ) | (13,190 | ) | | (13,515 | ) | (13,515 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Impairment
|
(228,272 | ) | (898 | ) | (229,170 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
(471,178 | ) | (167,268 | ) | (638,446 | ) | (217,268 | ) | (176,906 | ) | (394,174 | ) | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes, allocation to
minority interests, income from investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures and gain on sale of real estate
|
13,768 | (166,581 | ) | (152,813 | ) | 279,955 | (175,985 | ) | 103,970 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
(12 | ) | (1,123 | ) | (1,135 | ) | (585 | ) | 874 | 289 | |||||||||||||||||
Minority interests
|
(2,219 | ) | | (2,219 | ) | (1,821 | ) | 5 | (1,816 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income from investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
14,847 | 298 | 15,145 | 19,550 | 1,658 | 21,208 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate
|
| 216 | 216 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
26,384 | (167,190 | ) | (140,806 | ) | 297,099 | (173,448 | ) | 123,651 | ||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations (including net gain
(loss) on sales of real estate of $3,016 and ($6,326),
respectively)
|
(908 | ) | 5,807 | 4,899 | 1,731 | 8,941 | 10,672 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | 25,476 | $ | (161,383 | ) | $ | (135,907 | ) | $ | 298,830 | $ | (164,507 | ) | $ | 134,323 | ||||||||||||
Property net operating income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations
|
$ | 484,946 | $ | 687 | $ | 485,633 | $ | 497,223 | $ | 921 | $ | 498,144 | |||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
(599 | ) | 3,713 | 3,114 | 15,445 | 8,121 | 23,566 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total property net operating income
|
$ | 484,347 | $ | 4,400 | $ | 488,747 | $ | 512,668 | $ | 9,042 | $ | 521,710 | |||||||||||||||
Property operating margin from continuing and
discontinued operations(4)
|
61.7% | 64.6% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating margin from continuing
operations(4)
|
61.7% | 64.2% | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 24,304,190 | $ | 472,302 | $ | 24,776,492 | |||||||||||||||||||||
20
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
For the nine months ended | For the nine months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2004 | September 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Office | Corporate | Office | Corporate | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Properties | and Other | Consolidated | Properties | and Other | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating revenues(1)
|
$ | 2,353,643 | $ | 2,899 | $ | 2,356,542 | $ | 2,316,106 | $ | 3,196 | $ | 2,319,302 | ||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses(2)
|
(873,344 | ) | (1,016 | ) | (874,360 | ) | (819,891 | ) | (976 | ) | (820,867 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Property net operating income from continuing
operations
|
1,480,299 | 1,883 | 1,482,182 | 1,496,215 | 2,220 | 1,498,435 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to arrive at net income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other revenues
|
3,667 | 40,755 | 44,422 | 3,219 | 25,935 | 29,154 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense(3)
|
(161,254 | ) | (467,870 | ) | (629,124 | ) | (133,800 | ) | (489,499 | ) | (623,299 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
(549,002 | ) | (13,966 | ) | (562,968 | ) | (498,848 | ) | (9,968 | ) | (508,816 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Ground rent
|
(15,927 | ) | | (15,927 | ) | (15,000 | ) | | (15,000 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
| (38,208 | ) | (38,208 | ) | | (44,672 | ) | (44,672 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment
|
(228,272 | ) | (898 | ) | (229,170 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total
|
(950,788 | ) | (480,187 | ) | (1,430,975 | ) | (644,429 | ) | (518,204 | ) | (1,162,633 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes, allocation to
minority interests, income from investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures and gain on sale of real estate
|
529,511 | (478,304 | ) | 51,207 | 851,786 | (515,984 | ) | 335,802 | ||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
(429 | ) | (1,798 | ) | (2,227 | ) | (969 | ) | (1,312 | ) | (2,281 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Minority interests
|
(7,126 | ) | | (7,126 | ) | (6,168 | ) | 5 | (6,163 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Income from investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
43,145 | 2,457 | 45,602 | 60,041 | 2,877 | 62,918 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate
|
| 216 | 216 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations
|
565,101 | (477,429 | ) | 87,672 | 904,690 | (514,414 | ) | 390,276 | ||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations (including net gain on
sales of real estate of $7,138 and $45,339, respectively)
|
9,898 | 7,826 | 17,724 | 81,010 | 21,312 | 102,322 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
574,999 | (469,603 | ) | 105,396 | 985,700 | (493,102 | ) | 492,598 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
(33,697 | ) | | (33,697 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 541,302 | $ | (469,603 | ) | $ | 71,699 | $ | 985,700 | $ | (493,102 | ) | $ | 492,598 | ||||||||||||
Property net operating income:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations
|
$ | 1,480,299 | $ | 1,883 | $ | 1,482,182 | $ | 1,496,215 | $ | 2,220 | $ | 1,498,435 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
(372 | ) | 18,689 | 18,317 | 52,902 | 25,888 | 78,790 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total property net operating income
|
$ | 1,479,927 | $ | 20,572 | $ | 1,500,499 | $ | 1,549,117 | $ | 28,108 | $ | 1,577,225 | ||||||||||||||
Property operating margin from continuing and
discontinued operations(4)
|
63.0% | 64.9% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating margin from continuing
operations(4)
|
62.9% | 64.6% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 24,304,190 | $ | 472,302 | $ | 24,776,492 | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | Included in property operating revenues are rental revenues, tenant reimbursements, parking income and other income. |
(2) | Included in property operating expenses are real estate taxes, insurance, repairs and maintenance and property operating expenses. |
(3) | Interest expense for the Office Properties represents interest expense on property secured mortgage debt and does not include interest expense on the unsecured notes or the lines of credit. |
(4) | Property operating margin is calculated by dividing property net operating income by property operating revenues. |
21
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 14 | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
We maintain cash and cash equivalents at financial institutions. The combined account balances at each institution typically exceed FDIC insurance coverage and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. We believe the risk is not significant.
Environmental |
As an owner of real estate, we are subject to various environmental laws of federal and local governments. Our compliance with existing laws has not had a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, and we do not believe it will have a material adverse effect in the future. However, we cannot predict the impact of unforeseen environmental contingencies or new or changed laws or regulations on our current Properties or on properties that we may acquire.
Litigation |
Except as described below, we are not presently subject to material litigation nor, to our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against us, other than routine actions for negligence and other claims and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which are expected to be covered by liability insurance and all of which collectively are not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
On May 8, 2003, Broadband Office, Inc. and the official committee of unsecured creditors of Broadband Office Inc. filed a complaint in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware against one private and seven public real estate companies, various affiliated entities and certain individuals, including us, David Helfand (a former executive vice president of ours), Spieker Properties, Inc. and Spieker Properties, L.P. (which we acquired in 2001) and Craig Vought (formerly co-chief executive officer of Spieker Properties, Inc. and a former trustee of ours). On October 1, 2004, the Court entered its order dismissing the litigation with prejudice pursuant to a settlement among all of the parties. As part of the settlement, we paid the plaintiffs $351,429, which is an amount equal to our share of the total settlement consideration paid by all of the defendant real estate companies. In exchange, we received full payment on our administrative rent claims in the sum of $316,327 resulting in a net out-of-pocket expenditure of approximately $35,000.
We received three Notices of Violation (the NOVs) from the California South Coast Air Quality Management District (the District) with regard to certain equipment located at three of our Properties in the Pasadena, California area. The District is a regulatory body that is responsible for, among other things, permitting sources of certain air pollutants. Each of the subject Properties has a number of such sources located on it (standard equipment such as boilers, generators, and emergency fire pumps). The NOVs indicated that, among the Properties, two boilers, three generators, and a diesel-powered fire pump were not properly permitted as required by the Districts regulations. The equipment has now been properly permitted. Although we cannot determine the amount of any eventual monetary fine that the District will seek to impose, the District advised us in August 2004 that it may seek some level of monetary fine. We believe there to be significant mitigating factors which we have asked the District to consider in determining the amount of the fine. However, we do not believe that such monetary fine will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operation, or liquidity.
Forward-Starting Interest Rate Swaps |
As of December 31, 2003, we had $1.3 billion of forward-starting interest rate swaps outstanding, of which $800 million were settled in March 2004 and $500 million were settled in May 2004 (see Note 9 Unsecured Notes, Derivative Financial Instruments, and Lines of Credit). The market value of the swaps at December 31, 2003 represented a net liability to us of approximately $10.4 million (approximately $11.1 million is recorded in other assets and
22
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
$21.5 million is recorded in other liabilities). The corresponding net market value of the swaps was included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2003.
Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate Swaps |
In March 2004, we entered into fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements in the notional amount of $1.0 billion to hedge the $1.0 billion of unsecured notes also issued in March 2004. We are the variable interest rate payer and the counterparty is the fixed rate payer. The swaps effectively converted the unsecured notes to a variable interest rate based on LIBOR plus 43 basis points plus an additional 79 basis points for loan costs. The swaps are considered perfectly effective fair value hedges because the periodic settlement dates and other key terms correspond to the dates and other key terms of the hedged unsecured notes.
The fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps and the hedged unsecured notes are reflected on the consolidated balance sheet at market value. The market value of the swaps is reflected in other assets or other liabilities, and the corresponding market value of the unsecured notes is reflected as either a premium or discount on the unsecured notes. The market value of the swaps at September 30, 2004 represented a liability to us of approximately $31.4 million.
Contingencies |
Certain joint venture agreements contain buy/ sell options in which each party has the option to acquire the interest of the other party. Except for certain agreements in which our partners in two of our Office Properties can require us to buy their interests, such agreements do not generally require that we buy our partners interest. The exceptions allow our unaffiliated partners, at their election, to require that we buy their interests during specified future time periods, commencing in 2009 and at amounts that represent the fair market value of their interest at that time or at amounts based on formulas contained in the respective agreements. In addition, we have granted options to each of three tenants to purchase the Office Property it occupies.
In accordance with Statement of Accounting Standards No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies, we have not recorded a liability or the related asset that would result from the acquisition in connection with the above potential obligations because the probability of our unaffiliated partners requiring us to buy their interest is not currently determinable and we are unable to estimate the amount of the payment required for that purpose.
Approximately 230 of our Properties, consisting of approximately 30.9 million square feet, are subject to restrictions on taxable dispositions under tax protection agreements entered into with some of the contributors of the properties. The carrying value of these properties was approximately $6.6 billion at September 30, 2004. The restrictions on taxable dispositions are effective for periods expiring at different times through 2021. The terms of these tax protection agreements generally prevent us from selling the properties in taxable transactions unless we indemnify the contributing partners for their income tax liability on the portion of the gain on sale allocated to them as a result of the Propertys value at the time of its contribution to us or, in some cases, to our predecessor. We do not believe that the tax protection agreements materially affect the conduct of our business or our decisions whether to dispose of restricted properties during the restriction period because we generally hold these and our other properties for investment purposes, rather than for sale. Historically, however, where we have deemed it to be in our unitholders best interests to dispose of restricted Properties, we have done so through transactions structured as tax-deferred transactions under section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code. We anticipate structuring most future dispositions of restricted Properties as transactions intended to qualify for tax-deferred treatment. We therefore view the likelihood of incurring any such material indemnification obligations to be remote. Were we to dispose of a restricted Property in a taxable transaction, we generally would be required to pay to a partner that is a beneficiary of one of the tax protection agreements an amount based on the amount of income tax the partner would be required to pay on the incremental gain allocated to such partner as a result of the built-in gain that existed with respect to such Property at the time of its contribution to us, or in some cases, to our predecessor. In some cases there is a further requirement to reimburse any additional tax liability arising from the indemnification payment itself. The exact amount that would be payable with respect to any particular taxable sale of a
23
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
restricted Property would depend on a number of factors, many of which can only be calculated at the time of any future sale, including the sale price of the Property at the time of the sale, the partnerships basis in the Property at the time of the sale, the partners basis in the assets at the time of the contribution, the partners applicable rate of federal, state and local taxation at the time of the sale, and the timing of the sale itself.
Insurance |
Property Damage, Business Interruption, Earthquake and Terrorism: The insurance coverage provided through third-party insurance carriers is subject to coverage limitations. For each type of insurance coverage described below, should an uninsured or underinsured loss occur, we could lose all or a portion of our investment in, and anticipated cash flows from, one or more of the Properties. In addition, there can be no assurance that third-party insurance carriers will be able to maintain reinsurance sufficient to cover any losses that may be incurred.
EOP Partnership | Third-Party | |||
Type of Insurance Coverage | Loss Exposure/ Deductible | Coverage Limitation | ||
Property damage and business interruption(a)
|
$50 million per occurrence and $75 million annual aggregate exposure (which includes amounts paid for earthquake loss), plus $1 million per occurrence deductible | $1.0 billion per occurrence(c) | ||
Earthquake(a)(b)
|
$75 million per occurrence and annual aggregate exposure (which includes amounts paid for property damage and business interruption loss), plus $1 million per occurrence deductible | $325 million in the aggregate per year(c) | ||
Acts of terrorism(d)
|
$2.8 million per occurrence deductible (plus 10% of each and every loss with a maximum per occurrence exposure of $35.3 million which includes the $2.8 million deductible) | $825 million per occurrence(e) |
(a) | We retain up to $75 million annual aggregate of such loss throughout the portfolio. In the event of a loss in excess of this retention limit, the third-party insurance carriers would be obligated to cover the losses up to the stated coverage amounts in the above table. | |
(b) | The amount of the third-party insurance relating to earthquakes is based on maximum probable loss studies performed by independent third parties. The maximum annual aggregate payment amount for earthquake loss is $325 million, inclusive of our loss exposure of $75 million plus $1 million per occurrence deductible. There can be no assurance that the maximum probable loss studies have accurately estimated losses that may occur. | |
(c) | These amounts include our loss exposure/ deductible amount. | |
(d) | The coverage includes nuclear, chemical and biological events. The coverage does not apply to non-TRIA (Terrorism Insurance Act of 2002) events (which are terrorism events that are not committed by a foreigner or a foreign country). We maintain separate insurance with a $325 million annual aggregate limit subject to a deductible of $1 million for non-TRIA events. This separate coverage for non-TRIA events excludes nuclear, biological and chemical events. | |
(e) | This amount is in excess of our deductible amounts. |
Pollution: We have pollution and remediation insurance coverage for both sudden and gradual events. Limits for this exposure are $2 million per loss and $10 million aggregate per year subject to a deductible of $100,000.
Workers Compensation, Automobile Liability and General Liability: We have per occurrence deductible amounts for workers compensation of $500,000, auto liability of $250,000 and general liability of $1,000,000.
24
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
NOTE 15 | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
The following transactions occurred subsequent to September 30, 2004, through October 29, 2004:
1. We issued $800 million of 4.65% fixed rate unsecured notes and $200 million variable rate unsecured notes at LIBOR plus 60 basis points plus an additional 13 basis points for loan costs. The notes mature in October 2010. The effective rate of the fixed rate notes is 4.81%. The net proceeds were used to repay $125 million outstanding under our bridge facility, which then terminated in accordance with its terms. The remaining portion of the net proceeds were used to repay outstanding balances under our $1 billion line of credit.
2. We announced the redemption of our 7.25% Senior Exchangeable Notes which are due November 15, 2008. We have elected to exercise our right to redeem the Notes on November 22, 2004. In accordance with the terms of the Notes, the regular semi-annual interest payment will be paid on November 15, 2004 to holders of record on November 1, 2004. The total redemption price to be paid on the redemption date will be 100% of the principal amount of $325 million plus interest accrued from and including November 15, 2004 to the redemption date. In connection with the redemption, approximately $5.3 million of unamortized loan costs will be expensed in the fourth quarter.
3. We sold the Port of Oakland industrial property, which consisted of three buildings comprising approximately 199,733 square feet in Oakland, California, for approximately $15.1 million.
4. We issued approximately $3.8 million of fixed interest rate EOP InterNotes with coupon interest rates ranging from 3.8% to 4.0%. The notes mature in October 2008.
25
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain of the statements contained in this Form 10-Q which are not historical fact may be forward-looking statements. Such statements (none of which is intended as a guarantee of performance) are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, the risks described in our current report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on March 22, 2004, as the same may be supplemented from time to time. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this Form 10-Q is filed with the SEC. Among the factors about which we have made assumptions are the following:
| changes in general economic conditions and the effect of any such changes on white-collar job growth and the demand for office space in markets in which we have a presence; | |
| the availability of new competitive supply; | |
| our ability to maintain and increase occupancy; | |
| our ability to timely lease or re-lease space at anticipated net effective rents, calculated after giving effect to any required tenant improvements and leasing costs as well as rent concessions; | |
| the amount of lease termination fees, if any; | |
| the extent of any tenant bankruptcies and insolvencies; | |
| the cost and availability of debt and equity financing; | |
| our ability to acquire and dispose of certain assets from time to time on acceptable terms; | |
| the effect of any impairment charges associated with asset dispositions or changes in market conditions; | |
| our ability to realize anticipated cost savings and to otherwise create and realize economic benefits of scale; | |
| our ability to obtain, at a reasonable cost, adequate insurance coverage for catastrophic events, such as earthquakes and terrorist acts; and | |
| other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC. |
Overview
The following discussion and analysis is based primarily on the consolidated financial statements of EOP Partnership for the periods presented and should be read together with the notes thereto contained in this Form 10-Q. Terms employed herein as defined terms, but without definition, have the meanings set forth in the notes to the financial statements (See Item 1. Financial Statements).
Executive Summary
Equity Office is the largest office REIT and publicly held owner of office properties in the nation based on market capitalization and square footage. We receive our revenue primarily from rental revenues generated by leases for our office space. The key factors that affect the office business and our operating results are the following:
| the prevailing economic environment, including its effect on white-collar job growth in markets in which we have a presence; | |
| occupancy rates; | |
| rental rates on new leases; | |
| tenant improvements and leasing costs incurred to retain and obtain tenants; | |
| the extent of any early lease terminations and any lease termination fees; |
26
| operating expenses; and | |
| the extent of any dispositions and acquisitions. |
Current Economic Environment |
Over the past few years, we have faced an economic slowdown marked by slow employment growth and increased office vacancy in the United States. The poor economic environment and weak office markets adversely impacted our financial results. Although the economy appears to be recovering, this has not yet significantly impacted our financial results. Our overall office occupancy declined from 88.6% at December 31, 2002 to 86.7% at September 30, 2004. This was due to early lease terminations, which totaled approximately 8.4 million square feet, or approximately 6.7% of occupancy lost in our office portfolio since the beginning of 2003. Since the beginning of the fourth quarter 2003, our occupancy has remained relatively stable at slightly in excess of 86%, with an increase to 86.7% at September 30, 2004. We expect our occupancy to be approximately 88% by December 31, 2004.
The decline in market rental rates from their peak levels in 2000 and 2001 has also adversely impacted our financial results. Although market rental rates seem to have stabilized in many of our markets, the roll down of rents on our expiring leases to current market levels will continue to adversely impact our rental revenues, net income and funds from operations for the foreseeable future, assuming market rental rates do not materially increase from their existing levels. In addition, tenant improvements and leasing costs have increased significantly over the last 15 months due to the competitive market conditions for new and renewal leases. In 2004, we expect the cost to obtain and keep tenants, such as tenant improvements, leasing costs, rent concessions and other concessions, to approximate 2003 levels.
On a macroeconomic level, we believe office markets are beginning to recover and there will only be a minimal supply of new office space in most of our core markets in 2005. In 2003, net absorption was approximately 12.8 million square feet in our top 20 markets. In 2004, we expect net absorption of approximately 35 to 40 million square feet in the same markets. We anticipate annual growth in the gross domestic product in the range of 3.5% to 4% and modest office job growth in our top 20 markets. Although we believe this will lead to an increase in our occupancy level, any changes in these assumptions could impact our financial results.
Capital Transactions |
As part of our capital allocation strategy, we are concentrating our new investments in core markets and expect to sell non-core assets and exit non-core markets provided that market conditions for real estate assets remain favorable. We may incur gains or losses on property sales and may also incur impairment charges, some of which could be material, as a result of either sales or changes in market conditions.
During 2003 through September 30, 2004, we took advantage of favorable market conditions for property sales by disposing of approximately $1.4 billion in assets. In addition, we entered into joint ventures and sold a 75% to 80% interest in 13 Office Properties for approximately $596.5 million. We used the proceeds from these asset sales to repay debt, redeem preferred shares, acquire strategic assets in core markets, fund distributions to unitholders and repurchase Units. During this same period we acquired approximately $1.1 billion in assets.
The remaining portion of our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations will help you understand:
| the key transactions that we completed during the nine months ended September 30, 2004; | |
| our critical accounting policies and estimates; | |
| our results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003; | |
| our liquidity and capital resources; and | |
| our funds from operations. |
27
Key Transactions in 2004
During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, we completed the following key transactions:
Investing Activities |
| acquired $828.8 million in assets, consisting of 20 Office Properties comprising approximately 2,810,975 square feet (including a 50% interest in Colorado Center), our partners interests in 1301 Avenue of the Americas and two vacant land parcels; | |
| disposed of five office properties, 67 industrial properties, a 3% interest in an office property and one vacant land parcel in various transactions to unaffiliated parties for approximately $491.9 million. The sold office properties consisted of approximately 567,765 square feet and the industrial properties consisted of approximately 4,862,281 square feet; and | |
| disposed of our investment in preferred shares of CT Convertible Trust I for approximately $32.1 million. |
Financing Activities |
Debt |
| issued $1.0 billion of unsecured notes due March 2014 with a coupon interest rate of 4.75% and an effective rate of 5.54%. In connection with this issuance, we settled $800 million of forward-starting interest rate swaps for a payment of approximately $69.1 million. Approximately $0.2 million of this payment was considered an ineffective hedge and was expensed during the first quarter. The remaining $68.9 million was considered an effective hedge and is being amortized to interest expense over the 10-year term of the $1.0 billion notes; | |
| launched a new program allowing for the issuance of up to $500 million of unsecured medium-term notes for sale to retail investors through licensed brokers (EOP InterNotes). Since the beginning of the program, we have issued approximately $21.9 million of fixed interest rate EOP InterNotes with coupons ranging from 3.70% to 5.25%. Including all offering expenses, the effective rates of the InterNotes issued range from 3.97% to 5.46% and the maturity dates range from three to six and a half years. | |
| issued $45 million of unsecured notes due May 2014 at a variable rate of LIBOR plus 77.5 basis points; | |
| repaid approximately $880 million unsecured notes; | |
| repaid approximately $398.8 million of mortgage debt; | |
| obtained a $500 million bridge revolving credit facility that matured in July 2005; and | |
| cancelled a $1.0 billion standby 364-day line of credit. |
Swaps |
| entered into several fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements, total notional amount of $1.0 billion, that effectively converted the interest rate on the $1.0 billion unsecured notes issued in March 2004 from a fixed effective rate of 5.54% to a floating rate of LIBOR plus 43 basis points plus 79 basis points of loan costs; and | |
| settled $500 million notional amount of forward-starting interest rate swaps and recognized a gain of approximately $24.0 million. The swaps were entered into in 2003 to hedge an unsecured note offering that was expected to take place in June 2004, but did not occur. |
Preferred Units |
| redeemed the 8 5/8% Series C Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Units of Beneficial Interest for approximately $114.1 million. |
28
Other |
| consolidated the assets, liabilities and results of operations of the SunAmerica Center Office Property as of January 1, 2004 in accordance with FIN 46(R) and recognized a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle loss of approximately $33.7 million; and | |
| during September 2004, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of approximately $229.2 million on 46 non-core assets. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Refer to our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our critical accounting policies which include allowance for doubtful accounts, impairment of long-lived assets, depreciation and the fair value of financial instruments. There have been no material changes to these policies in 2004.
29
Results of Operations
Trends in Occupancy, Rental Rates, Lease Terminations and Tenant Improvements and Leasing Costs |
Below is a summary of leasing activity for tenants taking occupancy for the periods presented in our Office Properties. Our 10 largest markets in terms of property net operating income from continuing operations in order from greatest to least are Boston, San Francisco, San Jose, New York, Seattle, Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington D.C., Atlanta and Orange County. These markets accounted for approximately 78.6% of our property net operating income from continuing operations in the third quarter of 2004.
For the three months | For the nine months ended | For the year | ||||||||||||||||||||
ended September 30, | September 30, | ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Office Property Data: | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
10 Largest Markets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Portion of total office portfolio based on square
feet at end of period
|
70.1 | % | 68.6 | % | 70.1 | % | 68.6 | % | 69.4 | % | ||||||||||||
Occupancy at end of period
|
86.4 | % | 86.0 | % | 86.4 | % | 86.0 | % | 86.1 | % | ||||||||||||
Gross square footage for tenants whose lease term
commenced during the period
|
3,457,834 | 3,966,380 | 10,778,239 | 11,153,993 | 15,218,840 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted average annual rent per square foot for
tenants whose lease term commenced during the period:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP basis(a)(b)
|
$ | 25.54 | $ | 26.54 | $ | 26.36 | $ | 28.53 | $ | 27.93 | ||||||||||||
Cash basis(b)(c)
|
$ | 24.86 | $ | 25.62 | $ | 25.55 | $ | 27.67 | $ | 26.99 | ||||||||||||
Gross square footage for expiring and terminated
leases during the period
|
2,984,694 | 3,935,474 | 10,412,385 | 12,230,812 | 15,932,288 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted average annual rent per square foot for
expiring and terminated leases during the period:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP basis(a)
|
$ | 29.93 | $ | 29.02 | $ | 30.24 | $ | 30.71 | $ | 31.12 | ||||||||||||
Cash basis(c)
|
$ | 30.89 | $ | 29.63 | $ | 31.28 | $ | 31.34 | $ | 31.50 | ||||||||||||
Total Office Portfolio:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Occupancy at end of period
|
86.7 | % | 86.3 | % | 86.7 | % | 86.3 | % | 86.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Gross square footage for tenants whose lease term
commenced during the period
|
5,028,416 | 6,046,484 | 16,685,427 | 16,564,918 | 22,684,488 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted average annual rent per square foot for
tenants whose lease term commenced during the period:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP basis(a)(b)
|
$ | 24.28 | $ | 24.24 | $ | 23.97 | $ | 25.96 | $ | 25.68 | ||||||||||||
Cash basis(b)(c)
|
$ | 23.41 | $ | 23.31 | $ | 23.42 | $ | 25.20 | $ | 24.86 | ||||||||||||
Gross square footage for expiring and terminated
leases during the period
|
4,295,973 | 6,159,294 | 16,054,528 | 18,003,915 | 23,976,592 | |||||||||||||||||
Weighted average annual rent per square foot for
expiring and terminated leases during the period:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
GAAP basis(a)
|
$ | 27.79 | $ | 26.07 | $ | 27.19 | $ | 27.82 | $ | 28.14 | ||||||||||||
Cash basis(c)
|
$ | 28.61 | $ | 26.61 | $ | 28.04 | $ | 28.40 | $ | 28.55 |
(a) | These weighted average GAAP rental rates are based on the average annual base rent per square foot over the term of each lease and the current estimated tenant reimbursements, if any. | |
(b) | Weighted average annual rent per square foot for new office leases for tenants whose lease term commenced during the period may lag behind market because leasing decisions typically are made anywhere from one month to 12 or more months prior to taking occupancy. | |
(c) | These weighted average annual cash rental rates are based on the monthly contractual rent when the lease commenced, expired or terminated. For new and renewal leases, if the monthly contractual rent when the lease commenced is $0 then the rental rate represents the first monthly rent payment due multiplied by 12 months (Annualized Cash Rent). This amount reflects total base rent and estimated expense reimbursements without |
30
regard to any rent concessions and contractual increases or decreases in rent after the lease commences. We believe Annualized Cash Rent is a useful measure because this information can be used for comparison to current market rents as published by various third party sources. |
The general decline in occupancy for our Office Properties since the beginning of 2003 was a result of early lease terminations. Although lease termination fees increase current period income, future rental income will most likely be reduced. Given the decline in market rents, it is unlikely we will lease the space to new tenants at the same rental rates which had been payable under the terminated leases. We will also often incur downtime and additional costs to relet the space. Although there is no way of predicting future lease terminations, we currently anticipate that lease termination fees and the affected square feet will be lower in 2004 than 2003. The amount of lease termination fees are not necessarily proportionate to the square footage of leases being terminated.
We estimate the average annual total contractual rent of approximately $30.25 per square foot as of September 30, 2004 for all of our Office Properties, calculated on a cash basis, is approximately $3.50 to $4.00 per square foot above current market rent, which represents a potential rent roll down. However, the rent roll down for leases expiring in 2005 to market will be in the $5.00 to $6.00 range due to leases expiring five years after the rent peaked in many of our markets. This roll down in rents adversely affects our rental revenues and until market rental rates increase substantially from their current levels, we expect it to adversely affect our rental revenues in subsequent periods as we enter into new leases. The square footage of leases scheduled to expire and the Annualized Cash Rent per occupied square foot for these leases is presented below.
Annualized | ||||||||
Cash Rent | ||||||||
Square Feet of | per Occupied | |||||||
Year(a) | Expiring Leases | Square Foot | ||||||
2004 (remainder)
|
3,104,693 | $ | 25.13 | |||||
2005
|
13,040,530 | 29.62 | ||||||
2006
|
13,783,587 | 30.12 | ||||||
2007
|
13,495,875 | 28.94 | ||||||
2008
|
14,199,465 | 28.04 | ||||||
2009 and Thereafter
|
51,197,478 | 31.72 | ||||||
Total/ Average
|
108,821,628 | $ | 30.25 | |||||
(a) | Based on the contractual termination date of the lease without regard to any early lease termination and/or renewal options. |
During 2003 and continuing in 2004, we experienced increases in tenant improvements and leasing costs as compared to historical levels as a result of competitive market conditions for new and renewal leases. The weighted average tenant improvement costs and leasing costs per square foot incurred for office leases which commenced during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was approximately $18.56 compared to the cost of $18.07 per square foot incurred in the same respective period in 2003. The increase in tenant improvements and leasing costs resulted in a decrease in net effective rents (contract rents reduced by tenant improvements costs, leasing commissions and any rent concessions) for lease renewals and retenanted properties. We expect tenant improvements and leasing costs to average approximately $18 to $20 per square foot in 2004.
31
Period-to-Period Comparisons
Acquisition and Disposition Activity |
Below is a summary of our acquisition and disposition activity since January 1, 2003. The buildings and total square feet shown include properties we own in joint ventures with other partners that we either consolidate or account for under the equity method. The total square feet of these unconsolidated properties is included in the table. Excluding the joint venture partners share of the square feet of the office properties, we effectively owned 116,250,533 square feet of office space as of September 30, 2004.
Office Properties | Industrial Properties | ||||||||||||||||
Buildings | Square Feet | Buildings | Square Feet | ||||||||||||||
Properties owned as of:
|
|||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002
|
734 | 125,725,399 | 77 | 5,967,759 | |||||||||||||
Acquisitions
|
2 | 829,293 | | | |||||||||||||
Developments placed in service
|
5 | 1,218,215 | | | |||||||||||||
Dispositions(a)
|
(53 | ) | (5,182,707 | ) | (2 | ) | (216,900 | ) | |||||||||
Properties taken out of service(b)
|
(4 | ) | (450,548 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Building remeasurements
|
| 115,273 | | | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
684 | 122,254,925 | 75 | 5,750,859 | |||||||||||||
Consolidation of SunAmerica Center
|
1 | 780,063 | | | |||||||||||||
Developments placed in service(c)
|
1 | 114,955 | | | |||||||||||||
Dispositions
|
(1 | ) | (118,172 | ) | | | |||||||||||
Building remeasurements
|
| 1,501 | | 1,875 | |||||||||||||
March 31, 2004
|
685 | 123,033,272 | 75 | 5,752,734 | |||||||||||||
Acquisitions
|
2 | 328,741 | | | |||||||||||||
Dispositions
|
(4 | ) | (449,593 | ) | (38 | ) | (2,275,550 | ) | |||||||||
Building remeasurements
|
| 23,979 | | | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2004
|
683 | 122,936,399 | 37 | 3,477,184 | |||||||||||||
Acquisitions
|
18 | 2,482,234 | | | |||||||||||||
Dispositions
|
| | (29 | ) | (2,586,731 | ) | |||||||||||
Building remeasurements
|
| 32,818 | | | |||||||||||||
September 30, 2004
|
701 | 125,451,451 | 8 | 890,453 | |||||||||||||
(a) | Excludes partial sales of real estate, which are accounted for under the equity method because the properties are still included in our portfolio statistics. | |
(b) | Cambridge Science Center (f/k/a Riverview I) is now considered a development and 175 Wyman has been taken out of service and is being held for potential redevelopment. | |
(c) | Douglas Corporate Center II, a development at December 31, 2003, is included in the office portfolio as an operational property effective in the first quarter 2004. |
Results of Operations |
The financial data presented in the consolidated statements of operations show changes in revenues and expenses from period-to-period. We do not believe our period-to-period financial data are necessarily comparable because we acquire and dispose of properties on an ongoing basis. The following tables show results attributable to the Properties that were held during both periods being compared (the Same Store Portfolio) and the changes in our aggregate total portfolio of Properties (the Total Portfolio). The significant differences between our Same Store and Total Portfolios are:
| revenues recorded and expenses incurred at the corporate level; | |
| the consolidations of 1301 Avenue of the Americas and SunAmerica Center in the first quarter of 2004; |
32
| the consolidation of Key Center in the third quarter of 2003; | |
| the acquisition of two office buildings in 2003 comprising approximately 829,293 square feet and 20 office buildings acquired in 2004 comprising approximately 2,810,975 square feet; | |
| certain developments placed in service; | |
| the disposition of 55 properties in 2003 comprising approximately 5,399,607 square feet; | |
| the sale in December 2003 of 75% and 80% of our interests in 13 Office Properties (which are now accounted for under the equity method); and |
the disposition of 72 properties comprising approximately 5,430,046 square feet in 2004. |
Included in property operating revenues are rental revenue, tenant reimbursements, parking and other income. Included in property operating expenses are insurance, repairs and maintenance and property operating expenses.
33
Comparison of the three months ended September 30, 2004 to the three months ended September 30, 2003 |
The table below represents selected operating information for the Total Portfolio and for the Same Store Portfolio consisting of 635 consolidated Office Properties, eight Industrial Properties and 23 unconsolidated joint venture Properties acquired or placed in service on or prior to July 1, 2003.
Total Portfolio | Same Store Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | $ | % | 2004 | 2003 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating revenues
|
$ | 787,498 | $ | 776,091 | $ | 11,407 | 1.5 | % | $ | 727,419 | $ | 745,605 | $ | (18,186 | ) | (2.4 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||
Fee income
|
3,220 | 1,969 | 1,251 | 63.5 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
790,718 | 778,060 | 12,658 | 1.6 | 727,419 | 745,605 | (18,186 | ) | (2.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
189,862 | 172,876 | 16,986 | 9.8 | 172,893 | 164,085 | 8,808 | 5.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate taxes
|
94,275 | 83,670 | 10,605 | 12.7 | 84,742 | 78,128 | 6,614 | 8.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses
|
207,590 | 194,277 | 13,313 | 6.9 | 193,485 | 187,421 | 6,064 | 3.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ground rent
|
5,531 | 5,534 | (3 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 4,837 | 4,700 | 137 | 2.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative(a)
|
13,190 | 13,515 | (325 | ) | (2.4 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment
|
229,170 | | 229,170 | | 229,170 | | 229,170 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses
|
739,618 | 469,872 | 269,746 | 57.4 | 685,127 | 434,334 | 250,793 | 57.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
51,100 | 308,188 | (257,088 | ) | (83.4 | ) | 42,292 | 311,271 | (268,979 | ) | (86.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
1,811 | 3,380 | (1,569 | ) | (46.4 | ) | 752 | 769 | (17 | ) | (2.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized gain on sale of securities
|
4,737 | 307 | 4,430 | 1,443.0 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense(b)
|
(210,461 | ) | (207,905 | ) | (2,556 | ) | 1.2 | (37,567 | ) | (46,385 | ) | 8,818 | (19.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total other income (expense)
|
(203,913 | ) | (204,218 | ) | 305 | (0.1 | ) | (36,815 | ) | (45,616 | ) | 8,801 | (19.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes, allocation to
minority interests, income from investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures and gain on sale of real estate
|
(152,813 | ) | 103,970 | (256,783 | ) | (247.0 | ) | 5,477 | 265,655 | (260,178 | ) | (97.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
(1,135 | ) | 289 | (1,424 | ) | (492.7 | ) | (11 | ) | (491 | ) | 480 | (97.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Minority interests
|
(2,219 | ) | (1,816 | ) | (403 | ) | 22.2 | (2,517 | ) | (2,248 | ) | (269 | ) | 12.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income from investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
15,145 | 21,208 | (6,063 | ) | (28.6 | ) | 10,679 | 9,776 | 903 | 9.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate
|
216 | | 216 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
(140,806 | ) | 123,651 | (264,457 | ) | (213.9 | ) | 13,628 | 272,692 | (259,064 | ) | (95.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations (including net gain
(loss) on sales of real estate of $3,016 and ($6,326),
respectively)
|
4,899 | 10,672 | (5,773 | ) | (54.1 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | (135,907 | ) | $ | 134,323 | $ | (270,230 | ) | (201.2 | )% | $ | 13,628 | $ | 272,692 | $ | (259,064 | ) | (95.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Property net operating income from continuing
operations(c)
|
$ | 485,633 | $ | 498,144 | $ | (12,511 | ) | (2.5 | )% | $ | 449,192 | $ | 480,056 | $ | (30,864 | ) | (6.4 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Deferred rental revenue
|
$ | 16,421 | $ | 19,699 | $ | (3,278 | ) | (16.6 | )% | $ | 13,200 | $ | 18,624 | $ | (5,424 | ) | (29.1 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Lease termination fees
|
$ | 9,561 | $ | 15,467 | $ | (5,906 | ) | (38.2 | )% | $ | 8,050 | $ | 15,460 | $ | (7,410 | ) | (47.9 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
(a) | Corporate general and administrative expense is not allocated to the Same Store Portfolio because these expenses are not directly incurred in connection with any specific Property. | |
(b) | Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and prepayment expenses) for the Same Store Portfolio represents interest expense on property secured mortgage debt and does not include interest expense on the unsecured notes or the line of credit. | |
(c) | Represents segment data. See Item 1. Financial Statements Note 13 Segment Information. |
Property Operating Revenues |
The decrease in property operating revenues in the Same Store Portfolio was primarily attributable to lower average rental rates on new leases as compared to average rental rates on expiring leases and a decrease in lease termination fees of approximately $7.4 million. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in occupancy for the Same Store Portfolio from 86.5% at June 30, 2003 to 86.6% at September 30, 2004.
34
Depreciation and Amortization |
Total Portfolio and Same Store Portfolio depreciation and amortization expense increased from the prior period primarily as a result of capital and tenant improvements made since the beginning of the prior period and from an increase in leasing costs. Total Portfolio depreciation and amortization expense also increased as a result of Properties acquired and the consolidation of three Office Properties.
Real Estate Taxes |
Real estate taxes increased for the Same Store Portfolio primarily due to an increase in estimated taxes at our properties located in California of approximately $7.6 million offset, in part, by savings at our properties located in Boston of approximately $1.3 million.
Property Operating Expenses |
Property operating expenses increased for the Same Store Portfolio primarily as a result of increases in repairs and maintenance expense of approximately $5.8 million, insurance expense of approximately $0.8 million and utilities of approximately $2.6 million, partially offset by a decrease in other property operating expenses of approximately $3.1 million. During 2004, we expanded our preventive maintenance program in an effort to reduce future emergency repairs. This resulted in an increase in repairs and maintenance expense as compared to the third quarter 2003. The increase in utility expense was primarily due to general increases in rates charged by the utility suppliers.
Impairment |
During September 2004, after an in-depth review of our portfolio on an asset-by-asset basis, we reduced our intended holding period for 96 non-core assets comprising approximately 17.7 million square feet. We currently intend to sell these assets over the next five years, as market conditions warrant. Based on our analysis of the future cash flows of each asset over the next five years, we determined that 46 of the assets comprising approximately 2.8 million square feet were permanently impaired. The difference between the fair value (calculated either by discounting estimated future cash flows and sales proceeds or utilizing market comparables) and the net book value was approximately $229.2 million which was reflected as a non-cash impairment charge in the current quarter.
Realized Gain on Sale of Securities |
Realized gain on sale of securities increased for the Total Portfolio primarily due to the $2.3 million gain recognized from the disposition of our investment in CT Convertible Trust I preferred shares, of which Mr. Zell (Equity Offices Chairman of the Board of Trustees) is Chairman of the Board, and a gain of $2.4 million on the sale of other securities during the third quarter 2004.
Interest Expense |
Interest expense for the Same Store Portfolio decreased primarily as a result of mortgage debt repayments since July 1, 2003 totaling approximately $520.0 million, which encumbered 11 properties.
Income from Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
We acquired the remaining economic interests in 1301 Avenue of the Americas and Key Center office buildings and consolidated these Properties. The consolidation caused a decrease in income from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for the Total Portfolio. In the three months ended September 30, 2003, the net income from these Properties that was included in income from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures was approximately $3.4 million. This decrease was partially offset by the 13 Office Properties in which we sold 75% and 80% of our interests during December 2003 and are now accounted for under the equity method. These Properties contributed approximately $3.2 million to income from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in the three months ended September 30, 2004.
In addition, we sold our interest in Foundry Square IV in the third quarter 2003 and recognized a gain of approximately $7.1 million.
35
Gain on Sale of Real Estate |
In September 2004, the Four Oaks office property located in Houston, Texas, in which we owned an approximate 3% interest, was sold. Our share of the net proceeds from the sale was approximately $7.1 million and we recognized a gain from the transaction of approximately $0.2 million. We accounted for our investment under the cost method. As of September 30, 2004, our share of the net proceeds is reflected as a receivable and is included in prepaid expenses and other assets. The receivable was collected in October.
Discontinued Operations |
The decrease in discontinued operations was the result of the loss of net income due to sales of properties, partially offset by the net gain on the sale of properties during the three months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the prior period. Discontinued operations for the three months ended September 30, 2003 include the net income of properties sold in 2003 and 2004 whereas the discontinued operations in 2004 only include the net income of properties sold during the three months ended September 30, 2004.
36
Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2004 to the nine months ended September 30, 2003 |
The table below represents selected operating information for the Total Portfolio and for the Same Store Portfolio consisting of 635 consolidated Office Properties, eight Industrial Properties and 23 unconsolidated joint venture Properties acquired or placed in service on or prior to January 1, 2003.
Total Portfolio | Same Store Portfolio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Change | Change | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | $ | % | 2004 | 2003 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating revenues
|
$ | 2,356,542 | $ | 2,319,302 | $ | 37,240 | 1.6 | % | $ | 2,192,009 | $ | 2,234,633 | $ | (42,624 | ) | (1.9 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||
Fee income
|
10,129 | 10,431 | (302 | ) | (2.9 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
2,366,671 | 2,329,733 | 36,938 | 1.6 | 2,192,009 | 2,234,633 | (42,624 | ) | (1.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expenses:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
562,968 | 508,816 | 54,152 | 10.6 | 515,312 | 485,839 | 29,473 | 6.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate taxes
|
277,923 | 260,898 | 17,025 | 6.5 | 254,895 | 246,367 | 8,528 | 3.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property operating expenses
|
596,437 | 559,969 | 36,468 | 6.5 | 561,482 | 542,510 | 18,972 | 3.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ground rent
|
15,927 | 15,000 | 927 | 6.2 | 13,789 | 13,949 | (160 | ) | (1.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative(a)
|
38,208 | 44,672 | (6,464 | ) | (14.5 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment
|
229,170 | | 229,170 | | 229,170 | | 229,170 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total expenses
|
1,720,633 | 1,389,355 | 331,278 | 23.8 | 1,574,648 | 1,288,665 | 285,983 | 22.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
646,038 | 940,378 | (294,340 | ) | (31.3 | ) | 617,361 | 945,968 | (328,607 | ) | (34.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense):
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and dividend income
|
5,540 | 10,273 | (4,733 | ) | (46.1 | ) | 2,559 | 2,632 | (73 | ) | (2.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Realized gain on sale of securities
|
28,753 | 8,450 | 20,303 | 240.3 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense(b)
|
(629,124 | ) | (623,299 | ) | (5,825 | ) | 0.9 | (121,599 | ) | (140,718 | ) | 19,119 | (13.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total other income (expense)
|
(594,831 | ) | (604,576 | ) | 9,745 | (1.6 | ) | (119,040 | ) | (138,086 | ) | 19,046 | (13.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes, allocation to
minority interests, income from investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures and gain on sale of real estate
|
51,207 | 335,802 | (284,595 | ) | (84.8 | ) | 498,321 | 807,882 | (309,561 | ) | (38.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
(2,227 | ) | (2,281 | ) | 54 | (2.4 | ) | (446 | ) | (863 | ) | 417 | (48.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Minority interests
|
(7,126 | ) | (6,163 | ) | (963 | ) | 15.6 | (8,053 | ) | (7,004 | ) | (1,049 | ) | 15.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Income from investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
45,602 | 62,918 | (17,316 | ) | (27.5 | ) | 32,071 | 40,104 | (8,033 | ) | (20.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of real estate
|
216 | | 216 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations
|
87,672 | 390,276 | (302,604 | ) | (77.5 | ) | 521,893 | 840,119 | (318,226 | ) | (37.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations (including net gain on
sales of real estate of $7,138 and $45,399, respectively)
|
17,724 | 102,322 | (84,598 | ) | (82.7 | ) | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before cumulative effect of a change in
accounting principle
|
105,396 | 492,598 | (387,202 | ) | (78.6 | ) | 521,893 | 840,119 | (318,226 | ) | (37.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
(33,697 | ) | | (33,697 | ) | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 71,699 | $ | 492,598 | $ | (420,899 | ) | (85.4 | )% | $ | 521,893 | $ | 840,119 | $ | (318,226 | ) | (37.9 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Property net operating income from continuing
operations(c)
|
$ | 1,482,182 | $ | 1,498,435 | $ | (16,253 | ) | (1.1 | )% | $ | 1,375,632 | $ | 1,445,756 | $ | (70,124 | ) | (4.9 | )% | |||||||||||||||||
Deferred rental revenue
|
$ | 60,790 | $ | 49,961 | $ | 10,829 | 21.7 | % | $ | 50,417 | $ | 47,680 | $ | 2,737 | 5.7 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Lease termination fees
|
$ | 37,498 | $ | 36,397 | $ | 1,101 | 3.0 | % | $ | 30,683 | $ | 35,671 | $ | (4,988 | ) | (14.0 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||
(a) | Corporate general and administrative expense is not allocated to the Same Store Portfolio because these expenses are not directly incurred in connection with any specific Property. | |
(b) | Interest expense (including amortization of deferred financing costs and prepayment expenses) for the Same Store Portfolio represents interest expense on property secured mortgage debt and does not include interest expense on the unsecured notes or the line of credit. | |
(c) | Represents segment data. See Item 1. Financial Statements Note 13 Segment Information. |
37
Property Operating Revenues |
The decrease in property operating revenues in the Same Store Portfolio was primarily attributable to reduced occupancy in the Same Store Portfolio from 88.1% at December 31, 2002 to 86.6% at September 30, 2004. The decrease in occupancy was due to early lease terminations. In addition to the decline in occupancy, rental revenues declined as a result of lower average rental rates on new leases as compared to average rental rates on expiring leases.
Depreciation and Amortization |
Total Portfolio and Same Store Portfolio depreciation and amortization expense increased from the prior period primarily as a result of capital and tenant improvements made since the beginning of the prior period and from an increase in leasing costs. Total Portfolio depreciation and amortization expense also increased as a result of Properties acquired and the consolidation of three Office Properties.
Real Estate Taxes |
Real estate taxes increased for the Same Store Portfolio primarily due to an increase in estimated taxes at our properties located in California of approximately $13.9 million offset, in part, by savings at our properties located in Boston of approximately $6.3 million.
Property Operating Expenses |
Property operating expenses for the Same Store Portfolio increased primarily as a result of increases in repairs and maintenance expense of approximately $8.1 million, insurance expense of approximately $6.5 million and utilities of approximately $7.3 million, partially offset by a decrease in other property operating expenses of approximately $2.9 million. During 2004, we expanded our preventive maintenance program in an effort to reduce future emergency repairs. This resulted in an increase in repairs and maintenance expense as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in utility expense was primarily due to general increases in rates charged by the utility suppliers.
General and Administrative Expenses |
General and administrative expense decreased primarily as a result of approximately $7.9 million of consulting expenses and greater corporate level severance expense of approximately $2.8 million in 2003, partially offset by approximately $4.2 million of increased salaries and other general and administrative expense in 2004.
Impairment |
During September 2004, after an in-depth review of our portfolio on an asset-by-asset basis, we reduced our intended holding period for 96 non-core assets comprising approximately 17.7 million square feet. We currently intend to sell these assets over the next five years, as market conditions warrant. Based on our analysis of the future cash flows of each asset over the next five years, we determined that 46 of the assets comprising approximately 2.8 million square feet were permanently impaired. The difference between the fair value (calculated either by discounting estimated future cash flows and sales proceeds or utilizing market comparables) and the net book value was approximately $229.2 million which was reflected as a non-cash impairment charge in the current quarter.
Realized Gain on Settlement of Derivatives and Sale of Marketable Securities |
Realized gain on settlement of derivatives and sale of marketable securities increased for the Total Portfolio due to the $2.3 million gain recognized from the disposition of our investment in CT Convertible Trust I preferred shares, of which Mr. Zell (Equity Offices Chairman of the Board of Trustees) is Chairman of the Board, and a gain of $2.4 million on the sale of other securities during the third quarter 2004. In addition, we settled $500 million notional amount of forward-starting interest rate swaps and recognized a gain of approximately $24.0 million in May 2004. The swaps were entered into in 2003 to hedge an unsecured note offering that was expected to take place in June 2004, but did not occur.
38
During 2002, we entered into an early lease termination agreement with a tenant that was scheduled to occupy an entire building. As part of the consideration for the lease termination, we received five million shares of common stock. These securities were sold during the first quarter of 2003 for a gain of approximately $8.1 million.
Interest Expense |
Interest expense for the Same Store Portfolio decreased primarily as a result of mortgage debt repayments since January 1, 2003 totaling approximately $520.0 million, which encumbered 11 properties.
Income from Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
We acquired the remaining economic interests in 1301 Avenue of the Americas and Key Center office buildings and consolidated these Properties. The consolidation caused a decrease in income from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for the Total Portfolio. In the nine months ended September 30, 2003, the net income from these Properties that was included in income from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures was approximately $12.3 million. This decrease was partially offset by the 13 Office Properties in which we sold 75% and 80% of our interests during December 2003 and are now accounted for under the equity method. These Properties contributed approximately $10.6 million to income from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in the nine months ended September 30, 2004. We also sold our interest in Foundry Square IV in the third quarter 2003 and recognized a gain of approximately $7.1 million. Foundry Square IV also contributed approximately $2.0 million to income from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures during the nine months ended September 30, 2003.
In addition, income from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures for the Total and Same Store Portfolio also decreased because property operating revenues declined due to reduced occupancy and lower average rental rates on new leases as compared to average rental rates on expiring leases.
Gain on Sale of Real Estate |
In September 2004, the Four Oaks office property located in Houston, Texas, in which we owned an approximate 3% interest, was sold. Our share of the net proceeds from the sale was approximately $7.1 million and we recognized a gain from the transaction of approximately $0.2 million. We accounted for our investment under the cost method. As of September 30, 2004, our share of the net proceeds is reflected as a receivable and is included in prepaid expenses and other assets. The receivable was collected in October.
Discontinued Operations |
The decrease in discontinued operations was the result of the loss of net income due to sales of properties and a lower net gain on the sale of properties during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the prior period. Discontinued operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 includes the net income of properties sold in 2003 and 2004 whereas the discontinued operations in 2004 only includes the net income of properties sold during the nine months ended September 30, 2004.
Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle |
Under the provisions of FIN 46(R), we consolidated the assets, liabilities and results of operations of SunAmerica Center effective January 1, 2004, and recorded a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle resulting in a loss of approximately $33.7 million. See Item 1. Financial Statements Note 11 Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle.
Discontinued Operations
See Item 1. Financial Statements Note 4 Discontinued Operations for a summary of the results of operations of properties sold.
39
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Liquidity |
Our net cash provided by operating activities is primarily dependent upon the occupancy level of our properties, the rental rates on our leases, the collectibility of rent from our tenants and the level of operating and other expenses. Our net cash provided by operating activities has been our primary source of liquidity to fund debt service, capital improvements, tenant improvements and leasing costs for operating properties as well as distributions to our unitholders. We expect that our line of credit, other financing sources that may become available to us and future property sales will adequately provide for any additional amounts which may be needed to fund working capital and unanticipated cash needs as well as acquisitions and development costs.
A material adverse change in our net cash provided by operating activities may affect our ability to fund these items and may affect the financial performance covenants under our line of credit and unsecured notes. If we fail to meet our financial performance covenants and are unable to reach a satisfactory resolution with our lenders, the maturity dates for our unsecured notes could be accelerated, and our line of credit could become unavailable to us or the interest charged on the line of credit could increase. Any of these circumstances could adversely affect our ability to fund working capital and unanticipated cash needs, acquisitions and development costs.
Moodys, Standard & Poors and Fitch provide credit ratings on our unsecured notes and preferred stock. In July 2004, Moodys downgraded our credit ratings from Baa1 to Baa2 with a stable outlook. Standard & Poors and Fitch have retained our credit ratings at BBB+ with a stable outlook. If Standard & Poors or Fitch downgrades our credit ratings, the interest rate charged on our line of credit will increase. In addition, the interest rate associated with any future financings may be impacted if our credit ratings decline. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and is subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating.
In order to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, Equity Office must distribute an amount equal to at least 90% of its taxable income (excluding capital gains) to its shareholders. Equity Office currently distributes amounts attributable to capital gains to its shareholders; however, these amounts can be retained by Equity Office and taxed at the corporate tax rate. Our partnership agreement generally requires us to distribute substantially all of the net cash from operations each quarter and to make reasonable efforts to distribute to Equity Office enough cash for it to meet the 90% distribution requirement. Accordingly, we currently intend, although we are not legally obligated, to continue to make regular quarterly distributions to holders Units and preferred units. The declaration of dividends on capital shares is at the discretion of Equity Offices Board of Trustees, which decision is made from time to time by Equity Offices Board of Trustees based on then prevailing circumstances.
Lower occupancy levels, reduced rental rates, and reduced revenues as a result of asset sales have had the effect of reducing our net cash provided by operating activities. In addition, our tenant improvements and leasing costs have increased as compared to historical levels due to competitive market conditions for new and renewal leases. During the three months ended and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and the year ended December 31, 2003, our net cash flow provided by operating activities was insufficient to pay all of our capital improvements, tenant improvements and leasing costs as well as distributions to our unitholders. We funded this shortfall primarily with a combination of proceeds from property dispositions and borrowings under our line of credit.
If our net cash from operating activities and tenant improvements and leasing costs continue at these levels, and if Equity Offices Board of Trustees continues to declare distributions on our Units at current levels, we expect that such shortfall will continue in subsequent periods and that we will cover it in a similar manner.
As of September 30, 2004, we had approximately $2.0 billion of secured and unsecured debt maturing through December 31, 2005, which excludes scheduled principal payments prior to maturity. In addition, we will redeem $325 million of notes in November 2004. Should Equity Offices Board of Trustees continue to declare distributions at current levels we will not be able to retain sufficient cash to repay all of our debt as it comes due using only cash from operating activities and we will be required to repay most of our maturing debt with proceeds from asset sales and debt offerings. Although there can be no assurance that such funding at acceptable terms will be available to us, we believe that net cash provided by operating activities, draws under our line of credit, proceeds from other financing sources that we
40
Distributions |
In the third quarter 2004, Equity Offices Board of Trustees declared distributions on preferred units as reflected below:
Distributions for the | ||||||||||||
Distribution | Annualized | three months ended | ||||||||||
Declared for | Distribution | September 30, 2004 | ||||||||||
Security | Current Quarter | Per Unit | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||
Series B Preferred Units
|
$ | 0.65625 | $ | 2.625 | $ | 3,931 | ||||||
Series G Preferred Units
|
$ | 0.484375 | $ | 1.9375 | $ | 4,117 |
The Board of Trustees also declared distributions on the Units for the third quarter of 2004 at the rate of $.50 per unit.
Contractual Obligations |
As of September 30, 2004, we were subject to certain material contractual payment obligations as described in the table below. We were not subject to any material capital lease obligations or unconditional purchase obligations as of September 30, 2004.
Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Remainder | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Total | of 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | Thereafter | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage debt(a)
|
$ | 2,633,207 | $ | 9,879 | $ | 1,099,555 | $ | 286,776 | $ | 239,745 | $ | 134,964 | $ | 862,288 | ||||||||||||||||
Unsecured notes(b)
|
9,003,412 | 325,000 | 675,000 | 650,000 | 977,010 | 466,306 | 5,910,096 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Line of Credit
|
1,086,400 | | 125,000 | 961,400 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Series B Preferred Units
|
299,500 | | | | | 299,500 | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Share of mortgage debt of unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
343,769 | 110,840 | 19,270 | 52,283 | 2,622 | 16,989 | 141,765 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating leases
|
1,259,112 | 5,297 | 21,472 | 21,762 | 16,646 | 16,660 | 1,177,275 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Share of ground leases of unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
127,654 | 304 | 1,216 | 1,258 | 1,294 | 1,294 | 122,288 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Construction contracts on developments
|
470 | 470 | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Contractual Obligations
|
$ | 14,753,524 | $ | 451,790 | $ | 1,941,513 | $ | 1,973,479 | $ | 1,237,317 | $ | 935,713 | $ | 8,213,712 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted Average Interest Rates on Maturing
Debt:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage debt
|
7.68 | % | | 7.63 | % | 7.21 | % | 7.87 | % | 7.48 | % | 7.86 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Unsecured notes
|
6.73 | % | 7.64 | % | 5.67 | % | 7.52 | % | 7.51 | % | 6.92 | % | 6.57 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Line of credit
|
2.56 | % | | 2.63 | % | 2.55 | % | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Share of mortgage debt of unconsolidated joint
ventures
|
4.86 | % | 2.86 | % | 2.32 | % | 7.66 | % | | 6.92 | % | 5.43 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total Weighted Average Interest Rates
|
6.53 | % | 6.43 | % | 6.56 | % | 5.01 | % | 7.58 | % | 7.03 | % | 6.72 | % | ||||||||||||||||
(a) | Balance excludes a net unamortized discount of $13.8 million. | |
(b) | Balance excludes a net unamortized discount of $34.7 million. |
41
Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate Swaps |
See Item 1. Financial Statements Note 14 Commitments and Contingencies for information on our fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps.
Energy Contracts |
In an ongoing effort to control energy costs, from time to time we enter into contracts for the purchase of gas or electricity for properties in states which have deregulated their energy markets. Typically, these contracts provide for a term of one to three years. Although all or a portion of the commodity price under these contracts is generally fixed, the amounts actually expended under these contracts will vary in accordance with actual energy usage or the timing of energy usage during the period. As a result, the amounts to be expended under these contracts are difficult to predict.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with any unconsolidated investments or joint ventures that we believe have or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or capital resources.
Debt Financing |
Consolidated Debt |
The table below summarizes our consolidated mortgage debt, unsecured notes and line of credit indebtedness at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Balance
|
||||||||||
Fixed rate
|
$ | 10,436,680 | $ | 11,108,801 | ||||||
Variable rate(a)
|
2,237,858 | 370,000 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 12,674,538 | $ | 11,478,801 | ||||||
Percent of total debt
|
||||||||||
Fixed rate
|
82.3 | % | 96.8 | % | ||||||
Variable rate(a)
|
17.7 | % | 3.2 | % | ||||||
Total
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||
Effective interest rate at end of period
|
||||||||||
Fixed rate
|
7.28 | % | 7.11 | % | ||||||
Variable rate(a)
|
3.26 | % | 1.93 | % | ||||||
Effective interest rate
|
6.57 | % | 6.94 | % | ||||||
(a) | The variable rate debt as of September 30, 2004 includes $1.0 billion of fixed rate unsecured notes that were converted to a variable rate based on LIBOR plus 122 basis points through several interest rate swap agreements entered into on March 23, 2004. The interest rates for the remaining variable rate debt are based on various spreads over LIBOR. |
The increase in total consolidated debt of approximately $1,195.7 million from December 31, 2003 to September 30, 2004 was primarily due to the consolidations of SunAmerica Center and 1301 Avenue of the Americas, which were
42
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||
Consolidation of SunAmerica Center
|
$ | 203,225 | ||
Consolidation of our share of 1301 Avenue of the
Americas
|
451,285 | |||
Consolidation of our partners share of 1301
Avenue of the Americas
|
82,970 | |||
Total consolidation of mortgage debt
|
737,480 | |||
Mortgage debt repayments
|
(433,825 | ) | ||
Issuance of unsecured notes
|
1,066,912 | |||
Repayment of unsecured notes
|
(880,000 | ) | ||
Net activity on the line of credit
|
752,400 | |||
Increase in net discount on mortgage debt and
unsecured notes
|
(47,230 | ) | ||
Total increase of consolidated debt
|
$ | 1,195,737 | ||
Unconsolidated Debt |
Our share of unconsolidated debt was approximately $343.8 million and $797.3 million at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. The decrease of approximately $453.5 million was primarily due to the consolidation of 1301 Avenue of the Americas of which our share of the mortgage debt was approximately $451.3 million.
Mortgage Debt |
As of September 30, 2004, total mortgage debt (excluding our share of the mortgage debt encumbering unconsolidated properties of approximately $343.8 million) consisted of approximately $2,512.9 million of fixed rate debt with a weighted average interest rate of approximately 7.80% and $106.5 million of variable rate debt based on LIBOR plus 300 basis points (the effective rate on variable rate debt was 4.90% as of September 30, 2004 which includes the spread over LIBOR). See Liquidity and Capital Resources Contractual Obligations for annual payment obligations under our mortgage debt.
The instruments encumbering the properties restrict title transfer of the respective properties subject to the terms of the mortgage, prohibit additional liens, require payment of real estate taxes on the properties, maintenance of the properties in good condition, maintenance of insurance on the properties and include a requirement to obtain lender consent to enter into material tenant leases.
Line of Credit |
We have a $1.0 billion revolving credit facility that was obtained in May 2003 and matures in May 2006. As of October 29, 2004 and September 30, 2004, $176.0 million and $961.4 million was outstanding under this facility, respectively. The line of credit bears interest at LIBOR plus 60 basis points, but would increase in the event of an adverse change in our credit ratings from Standard & Poors or Fitch. The line of credit has an annual facility fee of 20 basis points payable quarterly. In addition, a competitive bid option, whereby the lenders participating in the credit facility may bid on the interest to be charged resulting in an interest rate lower than LIBOR plus 60 basis points, is available for up to $350 million of the borrowings under the credit facility. The effective rate on the line of credit at September 30, 2004 was approximately 2.55%.
Bridge Revolving Credit Facility |
In July 2004, we obtained a $500 million 364-day bridge revolving credit facility. The credit facility bore interest at LIBOR plus 65 basis points and had an annual facility fee of 15 basis points. Amounts borrowed under the facility are required to be repaid with certain cash proceeds from property sales and any cash proceeds from debt and equity offerings. This facility terminated in October 2004 following the issuance and sale by us of $1.0 billion of notes maturing in October 2010.
43
Unsecured Notes |
Unsecured notes increased to approximately $8,968.8 million at September 30, 2004 compared to approximately $8,828.9 million at December 31, 2003, as a result of the issuance of $1,066.9 million of unsecured notes, offset by the repayment of $880.0 million of unsecured notes and the net change in the discount/ premium of approximately $47.1 million relating to mark-to-market adjustments for interest rate swaps. The table below summarizes the unsecured notes outstanding as of September 30, 2004:
Coupon | Effective | Principal | |||||||||||||||
Original Term | Rate | Rate(a) | Balance | Maturity Date | |||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Fixed interest rate:
|
|||||||||||||||||
8 Years
|
6.88 | % | 6.40 | % | $ | 125,000 | 02/01/05 | ||||||||||
7 Years
|
6.63 | % | 4.99 | % | 400,000 | 02/15/05 | |||||||||||
7 Years
|
8.00 | % | 6.49 | % | 100,000 | 07/19/05 | |||||||||||
8 Years
|
7.36 | % | 7.69 | % | 50,000 | 09/01/05 | |||||||||||
6 Years
|
8.38 | % | 7.65 | % | 500,000 | 03/15/06 | |||||||||||
9 Years
|
7.44 | % | 7.74 | % | 50,000 | 09/01/06 | |||||||||||
10 Years
|
7.13 | % | 6.74 | % | 100,000 | 12/01/06 | |||||||||||
9 Years
|
7.00 | % | 6.80 | % | 1,500 | 02/02/07 | |||||||||||
9 Years
|
6.88 | % | 6.83 | % | 25,000 | 04/30/07 | |||||||||||
9 Years
|
6.76 | % | 6.76 | % | 300,000 | 06/15/07 | |||||||||||
10 Years
|
7.41 | % | 7.70 | % | 50,000 | 09/01/07 | |||||||||||
7 Years
|
7.75 | % | 7.91 | % | 600,000 | 11/15/07 | |||||||||||
10 Years
|
6.75 | % | 6.97 | % | 150,000 | 01/15/08 | |||||||||||
10 Years
|
6.75 | % | 7.01 | % | 300,000 | 02/15/08 | |||||||||||
8 Years(b)
|
7.25 | % | 7.64 | % | 325,000 | 11/15/08 | |||||||||||
10 Years
|
6.80 | % | 6.94 | % | 500,000 | 01/15/09 | |||||||||||
10 Years
|
7.25 | % | 7.14 | % | 200,000 | 05/01/09 | |||||||||||
11 Years
|
7.13 | % | 6.97 | % | 150,000 | 07/01/09 | |||||||||||
10 Years
|
8.10 | % | 8.22 | % | 360,000 | 08/01/10 | |||||||||||
10 Years
|
7.65 | % | 7.20 | % | 200,000 | 12/15/10 | |||||||||||
10 Years
|
7.00 | % | 6.83 | % | 1,100,000 | 07/15/11 | |||||||||||
10 Years
|
6.75 | % | 7.02 | % | 500,000 | 02/15/12 | |||||||||||
10 Years
|
5.88 | % | 5.98 | % | 500,000 | 01/15/13 | |||||||||||
20 Years
|
7.88 | % | 8.08 | % | 25,000 | 12/01/16 | |||||||||||
20 Years
|
7.35 | % | 8.08 | % | 200,000 | 12/01/17 | |||||||||||
20 Years
|
7.25 | % | 7.54 | % | 250,000 | 02/15/18 | |||||||||||
30 Years
|
7.50 | % | 8.24 | % | 150,000 | 10/01/27 | |||||||||||
30 Years
|
7.25 | % | 7.31 | % | 225,000 | 06/15/28 | |||||||||||
30 Years
|
7.50 | % | 7.55 | % | 200,000 | 04/19/29 | |||||||||||
30 Years
|
7.88 | % | 7.94 | % | 300,000 | 07/15/31 | |||||||||||
EOP InterNotes(c)
|
4.58 | % | 4.81 | % | 21,912 | 07/15/07-01/15/11 | |||||||||||
Weighted Average/ Subtotal
|
7.18 | % | 7.11 | % | 7,958,412 | ||||||||||||
Variable-interest rate:
|
|||||||||||||||||
10 Years(d)
|
4.75 | % | 3.88 | % | 1,000,000 | 03/15/14 | |||||||||||
10 Years(e)
|
2.55 | % | 2.65 | % | 45,000 | 05/27/14 | |||||||||||
Weighted Average/ Subtotal
|
4.66 | % | 3.82 | % | 1,045,000 | ||||||||||||
Total Weighted Average
|
6.89 | % | 6.73 | % | |||||||||||||
Net discount
|
(34,661 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 8,968,751 | |||||||||||||||
44
(a) | Includes the effect of settled interest rate protection and interest rate swap agreements, offering and transaction costs and premiums and discounts on certain unsecured notes. | |
(b) | The notes are exchangeable into Equity Office Common Shares at an exchange rate of $34.00 per share. If the closing price of a Common Share at the time a holder exercises its exchange right is less than the exchange price of $34.00, the holder will receive, in lieu of Common Shares, cash in an amount equal to 97% of the product of the number of Common Shares into which the principal amount of notes subject to such exercise would otherwise be exchangeable and the current market price per Common Share. Upon exchange of a $1,000 note for Common Shares of Equity Office, we would issue a corresponding number of Units to Equity Office on a one-for-one basis. We have elected to exercise our right to redeem these notes which are due November 15, 2008 on November 22, 2004. In connection with the redemption, approximately $5.3 million of unamortized loan costs will be expensed in the fourth quarter. | |
(c) | The rates shown are weighted average rates. The coupon rate on the EOP InterNotes range from 3.70% to 5.25%. Including all offering expenses, the all-in effective rates of the EOP InterNotes range from 3.97% to 5.46%. | |
(d) | In March 2004, we entered into several interest rate swap agreements that effectively converted these notes to a variable interest rate based on the 6-month LIBOR rate. | |
(e) | The notes have an interest rate of LIBOR plus 77.5 basis points. |
As of October 29, 2004, approximately $2.1 billion was available for issuance under two previously filed shelf registration statements totalling $7.0 billion.
Restrictions and Covenants under Unsecured Indebtedness |
Agreements or instruments relating to our line of credit and unsecured notes contain certain financial restrictions and requirements regarding total debt-to-assets ratios, debt service coverage ratios, minimum ratio of unencumbered assets to unsecured debt and other limitations. As of September 30, 2004, we believe we were in compliance with each of these financial restrictions and requirements. If we fail to comply with any of these restrictions and requirements, then the indebtedness could become due and payable before its stated due date.
Set forth below are the financial restrictions and requirements to which we are subject under our unsecured note indentures and our performance under each covenant as of September 30, 2004:
Covenants(a) (in each case as defined in the respective indenture) | Actual Performance | |||
Debt to Adjusted Total Assets may not be greater
than 60%
|
49% | |||
Secured Debt to Adjusted Total Assets may not be
greater than 40%
|
11% | |||
Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service to
Annual Debt Service charge may not be less than 1.50:1
|
2.40 | |||
Total Unencumbered Assets to Unsecured Debt may
not be less than 150%(b)
|
209% |
(a) | The calculations of our actual performance under each covenant are included as Appendix A to this Form 10-Q. | |
(b) | The unsecured notes assumed in the merger with Spieker Partnership are subject to a minimum ratio of 165%. |
45
Capital Securities |
The following table presents the changes in Equity Offices issued and outstanding Common Shares and EOP Partnerships Units (exclusive of Units owned by Equity Office) since December 31, 2003:
Common Shares | Units | Total | |||||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
400,460,388 | 49,032,230 | 449,492,618 | ||||||||||
Share options exercised
|
1,682,409 | | 1,682,409 | ||||||||||
Common Shares repurchased/ retired(a)
|
(1,397,883 | ) | | (1,397,883 | ) | ||||||||
Units redeemed for Common Shares
|
695,989 | (695,989 | ) | | |||||||||
Units redeemed for cash
|
| (69,580 | ) | (69,580 | ) | ||||||||
Units issued(b)
|
| 1,930 | 1,930 | ||||||||||
Restricted shares and share awards issued, net of
cancellations
|
970,658 | | 970,658 | ||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2004
|
402,411,561 | 48,268,591 | 450,680,152 | ||||||||||
Share options exercised
|
191,970 | | 191,970 | ||||||||||
Common Shares repurchased/retired(c)
|
(12,944 | ) | | (12,944 | ) | ||||||||
Units redeemed for Common Shares
|
558,768 | (558,768 | ) | | |||||||||
Units redeemed for cash
|
| (24,519 | ) | (24,519 | ) | ||||||||
Restricted shares and share awards issued, net of
cancellations
|
(14,123 | ) | | (14,123 | ) | ||||||||
Outstanding at September 30, 2004
|
403,135,232 | 47,685,304 | 450,820,536 | ||||||||||
(a) | These Common Shares were repurchased by Equity Office at an average price of $26.17 per share for approximately $36.6 million in the aggregate. In connection with the repurchases, we retired a corresponding number of Units for an aggregate purchase price equal to the aggregate purchase price for all Common Shares repurchases. | |
(b) | During the second quarter 2004, we issued Units in connection with the buyout of a partners interest in the 500 Orange property. The total value of the Units was approximately $50,000. | |
(c) | These Common Shares were repurchased by Equity Office at an average price of $27.84 per share for approximately $360,000 in the aggregate. In connection with the repurchases, we retired a corresponding number of Units for an aggregate purchase price equal to the aggregate purchase price for all Common Shares repurchases. |
Market Risk
Since December 31, 2003 there were no material changes in the information regarding market risk that was provided in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, except as noted below:
Interest Rate Risk |
As of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the fair value of our fixed-rate debt was approximately $1.1 billion and $1.3 billion higher than the book value of approximately $10.4 billion and $11.1 billion, respectively, due to the general decrease in market interest rates on secured and unsecured debt.
Interest Rate Risk Derivatives |
Forward-Starting and Fixed-to-Floating Interest Rate Swaps |
As of December 31, 2003, we had $1.3 billion of forward-starting interest rate swaps outstanding, which were all settled during the six months ended June 30, 2004. In the second quarter 2004 we settled $500 million notional amount of the forward-starting interest rate swaps and recognized a gain of approximately $24.0 million. The swaps were entered into in 2003 to hedge an unsecured note offering that was expected to take place in June 2004, but did not occur.
In March 2004, in conjunction with a $1.0 billion debt offering, we settled $800 million of forward-starting interest rate swaps that were outstanding as of December 31, 2003.
46
In March 2004, we entered into $1.0 billion of fixed-to-floating interest rate swap agreements to hedge the $1.0 billion of unsecured notes also issued in March 2004.
See Item 1. Financial Statements Note 14 Commitments and Contingencies for information on our forward-starting and fixed-to-floating interest rate swaps.
Capital Improvements, Tenant Improvements and Leasing Costs
Capital Improvements |
Significant renovations and improvements, which improve or extend the useful life of our Properties are capitalized. We categorize these capital expenditures as follows:
| Capital Improvements improvements that enhance the value of the property such as lobby renovations, roof replacement, significant renovations for Americans with Disabilities Act compliance, chiller replacement and elevator upgrades. | |
| Development and Redevelopment Costs include costs associated with the development or redevelopment of a property including tenant improvements, leasing commissions, capitalized interest and operating costs incurred during completion of the property and incurred while the property is made ready for its intended use. |
The table below details the costs incurred for each type of improvement.
For the three months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated | Unconsolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Properties | Consolidated | Properties | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Properties | (our share) | Properties | (our share) | ||||||||||||||
Capital Improvements:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Capital improvements
|
$ | 6,305 | $ | 1,034 | $ | 14,633 | $ | 1,881 | ||||||||||
Development costs
|
1,595 | 19 | 23,500 | 1,336 | ||||||||||||||
Redevelopment costs
|
901 | | 1,668 | | ||||||||||||||
Total capital improvements
|
$ | 8,801 | $ | 1,053 | $ | 39,801 | $ | 3,217 | ||||||||||
For the nine months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Unconsolidated | Unconsolidated | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated | Properties | Consolidated | Properties | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Properties | (our share) | Properties | (our share) | ||||||||||||||
Capital Improvements:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Capital improvements
|
$ | 27,794 | $ | 2,811 | $ | 28,440 | $ | 3,557 | ||||||||||
Development costs
|
44,123 | 182 | 69,267 | 5,667 | ||||||||||||||
Redevelopment costs
|
1,257 | | 7,213 | | ||||||||||||||
Total capital improvements
|
$ | 73,174 | $ | 2,993 | $ | 104,920 | $ | 9,224 | ||||||||||
Tenant Improvements and Leasing Costs |
Costs related to the renovation, alteration or build-out of existing office space, as well as related leasing costs, are capitalized and depreciated or amortized over the lease term. These tenant improvements may include, but are not limited to, floor coverings, ceilings, walls, HVAC, mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire protection systems.
47
The amounts shown below represent the total tenant improvements and leasing costs for leases which commenced during the period, regardless of when such costs were actually paid.
For the three months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Cost | Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
per Square | per Square | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts) | Total Costs | Foot Leased | Total Costs | Foot Leased | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Properties:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Office Properties:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Renewals
|
$ | 26,304 | $ | 15.13 | $ | 32,912 | $ | 13.90 | |||||||||
Retenanted
|
73,702 | 27.04 | 97,650 | 29.39 | |||||||||||||
Total/ Weighted Average
|
$ | 100,006 | $ | 22.40 | $ | 130,562 | $ | 22.94 | |||||||||
Industrial Properties:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Renewals
|
$ | 278 | $ | 2.08 | $ | 555 | $ | 3.85 | |||||||||
Retenanted
|
1,224 | 8.54 | 437 | 2.40 | |||||||||||||
Total/ Weighted Average
|
$ | 1,502 | $ | 5.42 | $ | 992 | $ | 3.04 | |||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint
Ventures(a):
|
|||||||||||||||||
Renewals
|
$ | 1,096 | $ | 16.49 | $ | 2,261 | $ | 20.10 | |||||||||
Retenanted
|
3,321 | 42.26 | 1,031 | 18.92 | |||||||||||||
Total/ Weighted Average
|
$ | 4,417 | $ | 30.45 | $ | 3,292 | $ | 19.71 | |||||||||
Total Properties (renewals and retenanted
combined):
|
|||||||||||||||||
Office (consolidated and unconsolidated)
|
$ | 104,423 | $ | 22.66 | $ | 133,854 | $ | 22.85 | |||||||||
Industrial
|
1,502 | 5.42 | 992 | 3.04 | |||||||||||||
Total/ Weighted Average
|
$ | 105,925 | $ | 21.68 | $ | 134,846 | $ | 21.80 | |||||||||
For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Cost | Total Cost | ||||||||||||||||
per Square | per Square | ||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except per square foot amounts) | Total Costs | Foot Leased | Total Costs | Foot Leased | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Properties:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Office Properties:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Renewals
|
$ | 72,527 | $ | 11.10 | $ | 89,227 | $ | 11.72 | |||||||||
Retenanted
|
192,608 | 24.05 | 176,248 | 23.83 | |||||||||||||
Total/ Weighted Average
|
$ | 265,135 | $ | 18.23 | $ | 265,475 | $ | 17.69 | |||||||||
Industrial Properties:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Renewals
|
$ | 1,623 | $ | 2.24 | $ | 1,036 | $ | 3.35 | |||||||||
Retenanted
|
2,817 | 6.17 | 1,030 | 3.07 | |||||||||||||
Total/ Weighted Average
|
$ | 4,440 | $ | 3.76 | $ | 2,066 | $ | 3.20 | |||||||||
Unconsolidated Joint
Ventures(a):
|
|||||||||||||||||
Renewals
|
$ | 9,794 | $ | 20.03 | $ | 12,150 | $ | 30.43 | |||||||||
Retenanted
|
9,827 | 31.25 | 3,861 | 27.49 | |||||||||||||
Total/ Weighted Average
|
$ | 19,621 | $ | 24.42 | $ | 16,011 | $ | 27.87 | |||||||||
Total Properties (renewals and retenanted
combined):
|
|||||||||||||||||
Office (consolidated and unconsolidated)
|
$ | 284,756 | $ | 18.56 | $ | 281,486 | $ | 18.07 | |||||||||
Industrial
|
4,440 | 3.76 | 2,066 | 3.20 | |||||||||||||
Total/ Weighted Average
|
$ | 289,196 | $ | 17.50 | $ | 283,552 | $ | 17.47 | |||||||||
(a) | Represents our share of unconsolidated joint venture tenant improvements and leasing costs for office properties. |
48
Tenant improvements and leasing costs have increased over the last 15 months as compared to historical levels due to competitive market conditions for new and renewal leases. These increases in tenant improvements and leasing costs contributed to a decrease in net effective rents (contract rents reduced by tenant improvements costs, leasing commissions and any rent concessions) for lease renewals and retenanted properties.
The above information includes capital improvements incurred during the periods shown. Tenant improvements and leasing costs are reported for leases which commenced during the periods shown which is consistent with how we report our per square foot tenant improvements and leasing costs. The amounts included in the consolidated statement of cash flows represent the cash expenditures made during the period regardless of when the leases commence. The differences between these amounts represent timing differences between the lease commencement dates and the actual cash expenditures. In addition, the figures below include expenditures for corporate furniture, fixtures and equipment, software, leasehold improvements and other. The reconciliation between the amounts above for the consolidated properties and the amounts disclosed in the consolidated statements of cash flows is as follows:
For the | For the | |||||||||||||||||
three months ended | nine months ended | |||||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
Capital improvements
|
$ | 6,305 | $ | 14,633 | $ | 27,794 | $ | 28,440 | ||||||||||
Tenant improvements and leasing costs:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Office Properties
|
100,006 | 130,562 | 265,135 | 265,475 | ||||||||||||||
Industrial Properties
|
1,502 | 992 | 4,440 | 2,066 | ||||||||||||||
Expenditures for corporate furniture, fixtures
and equipment, software, leasehold improvements and other
|
1,477 | 9,079 | 7,029 | 17,450 | ||||||||||||||
Subtotal
|
109,290 | 155,266 | 304,398 | 313,431 | ||||||||||||||
Development costs
|
1,595 | 23,500 | 44,123 | 69,267 | ||||||||||||||
Redevelopment costs
|
901 | 1,668 | 1,257 | 7,213 | ||||||||||||||
Timing differences
|
13,310 | (17,254 | ) | 79,546 | 22,238 | |||||||||||||
Total capital improvements, tenant improvements
and leasing costs
|
$ | 125,096 | $ | 163,180 | $ | 429,324 | $ | 412,149 | ||||||||||
Capital and tenant improvements from the
consolidated statement of cash flows
|
$ | 91,969 | $ | 127,160 | $ | 335,322 | $ | 302,080 | ||||||||||
Lease commissions and other costs from the
consolidated statement of cash flows
|
33,127 | 36,020 | 94,002 | 110,069 | ||||||||||||||
Total capital improvements, tenant improvements
and leasing costs from the consolidated statement of cash flows
|
$ | 125,096 | $ | 163,180 | $ | 429,324 | $ | 412,149 | ||||||||||
Developments
We own directly several properties in various stages of development or pre-development. These developments are funded by working capital and our line of credit. Specifically identifiable direct acquisition, development and construction costs are capitalized, including, where applicable, salaries and related costs, real estate taxes and interest incurred in developing the property. The properties under development and all figures stated below are as of September 30, 2004.
Placed in | Costs | Total | Current | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service | Number of | Square | Incurred | Estimated | Percentage | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | Date(a) | Location | Buildings | Feet | to Date | Costs(b) | Leased | |||||||||||||||||||||
Wholly-Owned
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kruse Woods V
|
4Q/2003 | Lake Oswego, OR | 1 | 184,000 | $ | 29,947 | $ | 33,900 | 73 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Cambridge Science Center
|
2Q/2004 | Cambridge, MA | 1 | 131,000 | 38,405 | 54,900 | 39 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total/ Weighted Average
|
2 | 315,000 | $ | 68,352 | $ | 88,800 | 59 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | The Placed in Service Date represents the date the certificate of occupancy was obtained. Subsequent to obtaining the certificate of occupancy, the property is expected to undergo a lease-up period. |
49
(b) | The Total Estimated Costs represent 100% of the developments estimated costs, including the acquisition cost of the land and building, if any. The Total Estimated Costs are subject to change upon, or prior to, the completion of the development and include amounts required to lease the property. |
In addition to the developments described above, we own or have under option various land parcels available for development. These sites represent possible future development of up to approximately 13 million square feet of office space. These developments will be impacted by the timing and likelihood of success of the entitlement processes, both of which are uncertain. These various sites include, among others: Russia Wharf, Boston, MA; Reston Town Center, Reston, VA; Dulles Station, Herndon, VA; Prominence in Buckhead, Atlanta, GA; Perimeter Center, Atlanta, GA; Tabor Center, Denver, CO; Bridge Pointe Corporate Centre, San Diego, CA; La Jolla Centre, San Diego, CA; Orange Center, Orange, CA; Waters Edge, Los Angeles, CA; Skyport Plaza, San Jose, CA; Foundry Square, San Francisco, CA; San Rafael Corporate Center, San Rafael, CA; Station Landing, Walnut Creek, CA; Parkshore Plaza, Folsom, CA; City Center Bellevue, Bellevue, WA; and 8th Street, Bellevue, WA.
There are no unconsolidated joint venture properties under development as of September 30, 2004.
Inflation
Substantially all of our office leases require the tenant to pay, as additional rent, a portion of real estate taxes and operating expenses. In addition, many of our office leases provide for fixed increases in base rent or indexed escalations (based on the Consumer Price Index or other measures). We believe that the majority of inflationary increases in expenses will be offset, in part, by the expense reimbursements and contractual rent increases described above.
Cash Flows
The table below summarizes the changes in our cash and cash equivalents as a result of operating, investing and financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2003:
For the nine months ended | |||||||||||||
September 30, | |||||||||||||
Increase/ | |||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | (Decrease) | |||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the
period
|
$ | 69,398 | $ | 58,471 | $ | 10,927 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
864,817 | 929,905 | (65,088 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash (used for) investing activities
|
(641,345 | ) | (68,610 | ) | (572,735 | ) | |||||||
Net cash (used for) financing activities
|
(170,110 | ) | (813,981 | ) | 643,871 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
$ | 122,760 | $ | 105,785 | $ | 16,975 | |||||||
Operating Activities |
Cash flows from operations depend primarily on cash generated from lease payments from tenants in our Office Properties. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities is primarily attributable to lower occupancy levels, reduced rental rates and reduced revenues as a result of asset sales.
Investing Activities |
Net cash used for investing activities reflects the net impact of the acquisition and disposition of certain properties, investments in and distributions from our unconsolidated joint ventures (including our acquisition of a 50% interest in Colorado Center in 2004 for approximately $220.8 million), and expenditures for capital improvements, tenant improvements and lease costs. In addition, we received approximately $32.1 million from the disposal of our investment in preferred securities of CT Convertible Trust I in 2004 and amounts released from escrow deposits.
50
Financing Activities |
Net cash used for financing activities generally includes cash provided by or used for debt transactions, distributions to our common and preferred unitholders and repurchases of our securities. Net cash used for financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2003 decreased primarily as a result of the following transactions:
| we had net proceeds from mortgages, unsecured notes and lines of credit of approximately $501.7 million in the current period compared to approximately $267.3 million in the prior period; | |
| we repurchased or redeemed approximately $151.0 million of our common and preferred securities in the current period compared to approximately $613.5 million in the prior period; and | |
| we paid approximately $69.1 million to settle swaps in the current period compared to receiving approximately $.8 million in the prior period. |
Additional Items for 2004
Developments in Process |
Developments in process decreased by approximately $6.9 million to $68.4 million at September 30, 2004 compared to $75.2 million at December 31, 2003. This decrease was a result of one development placed in service (Douglas Corporate Center II of which total costs incurred at December 31, 2003 were approximately $13.6 million), partially offset by additional costs of approximately $6.7 million spent on current developments.
Deferred Rent Receivable |
Deferred rent receivable increased by approximately $83.5 million to $462.8 million at September 30, 2004, compared to $379.3 million at December 31, 2003. This increase was primarily a result of a $60.8 million increase in receivables recorded from tenants for the current difference between the straight-line rent and the rent that is contractually due from tenants, a $5.4 million increase related to the consolidation of SunAmerica Center and a $15.4 million increase related to the consolidation of the 1301 Avenue of the Americas office building after we acquired the remaining economic interest in the joint venture.
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures |
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures increased by approximately $51.7 million to $1,179.0 million at September 30, 2004, compared to $1,127.2 million at December 31, 2003. This increase was primarily a result of the acquisition of Colorado Center for $220.8 million partially offset by a $157.7 million investment at December 31, 2003 in the 1301 Avenue of the Americas office building, which was consolidated in February 2004 after we acquired the remaining economic interest in the joint venture.
Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets |
Prepaid expenses and other assets decreased by approximately $173.7 million to $171.3 million at September 30, 2004 compared to $344.9 million at December 31, 2003. This decrease was primarily a result of an $82.2 million note receivable related to the SunAmerica Center whose assets, liabilities, and results of operations were consolidated in 2004, a $40.2 million decrease in prepaid expenses, the sale of our investment in CT Convertible Trust I preferred shares which had a book value of $30.0 million and an $11.1 million decrease in the market value of the forward-starting interest rate swaps.
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses |
Accounts payable and accrued expenses decreased by approximately $114.1 million to $458.9 million at September 30, 2004 compared to $573.1 million at December 31, 2003. This decrease was a result of a $45.8 million decrease in accrued interest expense and a $94.3 million decrease in accounts payable offset by a $25.9 million increase in accrued real estate taxes.
51
Distribution Payable |
Distribution payable increased by approximately $226.9 million to approximately $230.8 million at September 30, 2004 compared to $3.9 million at December 31, 2003. This increase was primarily a result of the Unit distribution declaration for the third quarter of 2004, which was paid in October 2004. The fourth quarter 2003 distribution was declared and paid in the fourth quarter of 2003.
Other Liabilities |
Other liabilities increased by approximately $57.0 million to approximately $455.2 million at September 30, 2004 compared to $398.3 million at December 31, 2003. This increase was primarily due to the consolidation of the SunAmerica property pursuant to FIN 46(R) and the related mezzanine debt of approximately $51.9 million, which is net of a discount of approximately $29.3 million.
Preferred Units |
Preferred units decreased by approximately $114.1 million due to the redemption of the Series C Preferred Units in the first quarter 2004.
Subsequent Events
See Note 15 Subsequent Events for transactions that occurred subsequent to September 30, 2004 through October 29, 2004.
52
Funds from Operations (FFO)
FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure. We believe FFO, as defined by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (NAREIT), to be an appropriate measure of performance for a real estate company, for the reasons, and subject to the qualifications, specified below. The following table reflects the reconciliation of FFO to net income, the most directly comparable GAAP measure for the periods presented.
For the three months ended September 30, | For the nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per | Per | Per | Per | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, | Average | Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
except per unit amounts) | Dollars | Unit(b) | Dollars | Unit(b) | Dollars | Unit(b) | Dollars | Unit(b) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reconciliation of net (loss) income to
FFO(a):
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income
|
$ | (135,907 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) | $ | 134,323 | $ | 0.30 | $ | 71,699 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 492,598 | $ | 1.09 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate related depreciation and amortization
and net gain (loss) on sales of real estate, including our share
of unconsolidated joint ventures and adjusted for minority
interests share in partially owned properties
|
194,048 | 0.43 | 188,277 | 0.42 | 577,940 | 1.29 | 505,927 | 1.12 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle
|
| | | | 33,697 | 0.08 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
FFO
|
58,141 | 0.13 | 322,600 | 0.72 | 683,336 | 1.52 | 998,525 | 2.21 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred distributions
|
(8,701 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (10,508 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (30,393 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (41,364 | ) | (0.09 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
FFO available to unitholders basic
|
$ | 49,440 | $ | 0.11 | $ | 312,092 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 652,943 | $ | 1.46 | $ | 957,161 | $ | 2.12 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Income | FFO | Net Income | FFO | Net Income | FFO | Net Income | FFO | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Adjustments to arrive at FFO available to
unitholders plus assumed conversions:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income and FFO
|
$ | (135,907 | ) | $ | 58,141 | $ | 134,323 | $ | 322,600 | $ | 71,699 | $ | 683,336 | $ | 492,598 | $ | 998,525 | |||||||||||||||
Preferred distributions
|
(8,701 | ) | (8,701 | ) | (10,508 | ) | (10,508 | ) | (30,393 | ) | (30,393 | ) | (41,364 | ) | (41,364 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income and FFO available to unitholders
|
(144,608 | ) | 49,440 | 123,815 | 312,092 | 41,306 | 652,943 | 451,234 | 957,161 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Preferred distributions on Series B
preferred shares, of which is assumed to be converted into
Units(c)
|
| | | 3,931 | | | | 11,793 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income and FFO available to
unitholders plus assumed conversions
|
$ | (144,608 | ) | $ | 49,440 | $ | 123,815 | $ | 316,023 | $ | 41,306 | $ | 652,943 | $ | 451,234 | $ | 968,954 | |||||||||||||||
Weighted average Units, dilutive potential units
plus assumed conversions outstanding
|
448,766,905 | 450,420,567 | 448,805,388 | 457,194,742 | 450,801,177 | 450,801,177 | 453,451,913 | 461,841,267 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income and FFO available to
unitholders plus assumed conversions per unit
|
$ | (0.32 | ) | $ | 0.11 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.09 | $ | 1.45 | $ | 1.00 | $ | 2.10 | |||||||||||||||
53
Units and unit equivalents | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average Units outstanding (used for both
net (loss) income and FFO basic per Unit calculation)
|
448,766,905 | 446,750,227 | 448,900,112 | 451,731,474 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of share options and restricted units
which are dilutive to both net income and FFO
|
| 2,055,161 | 1,901,065 | 1,720,439 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average Units and dilutive potential
units used for net (loss) income available to unitholders
|
448,766,905 | 448,805,388 | 450,801,177 | 453,451,913 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of conversion of Series B preferred
units(c)
|
| 8,389,354 | | 8,389,354 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Impact of share options and restricted units
which are dilutive to FFO but not dilutive to net (loss)
|
1,653,662 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average Units, dilutive potential units
plus assumed conversions used for the calculation of FFO
available to unitholders plus assumed conversions
|
450,420,567 | 457,194,742 | 450,801,177 | 461,841,267 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(a) | FFO is a non-GAAP financial measure. The most directly comparable GAAP measure is net (loss) income, to which it is reconciled. See definition below. | |
(b) | FFO per unit may not total the sum of the per unit components in the reconciliation due to rounding. | |
(c) | The Series B preferred units are not dilutive to EPS for each period presented and are not dilutive to FFO per unit for the three months ended and nine months ended September 30, 2004. However, the Series B preferred units are dilutive to FFO per unit for the three months ended and nine months ended September 30, 2003. |
54
FFO Definition:
FFO is defined as net (loss) income, computed in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of properties, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect funds from operations on the same basis. We believe that FFO is helpful to investors as one of several measures of the performance of a real estate company. We further believe that by excluding the effect of depreciation, amortization and gains or losses from sales of real estate, all of which are based on historical costs and which may be of limited relevance in evaluating current performance, FFO can facilitate comparisons of operating performance between periods and between other real estate companies. Investors should review FFO, along with GAAP net (loss) income when trying to understand a real estate companys operating performance. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by NAREIT, which may not be comparable to FFO reported by other real estate companies that do not define the term in accordance with the current NAREIT definition or that interpret the current NAREIT definition differently than we do. FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, nor does it represent cash available to pay distributions and should not be considered as an alternative to net (loss) income, determined in accordance with GAAP, as an indication of our financial performance, or to cash flow from operating activities, determined in accordance with GAAP, as a measure of our liquidity, nor is it indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make cash distributions.
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. |
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are incorporated herein by reference from Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Market Risk.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures. |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
Equity Offices principal executive officer, Richard D. Kincaid, and Equity Offices principal financial officer, Marsha C. Williams, evaluated as of September 30, 2004 the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms. As a result of this evaluation, these executive officers have concluded that, as of such date, the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation referred to above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
55
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings. |
Legal proceedings are incorporated herein by reference from Item 1. Financial Statements Note 14 Commitments and Contingencies.
Item 6. | Exhibits. |
The exhibits required by this Item are set forth on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
56
FINANCIAL COVENANT CALCULATIONS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2004
EOP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Compliance with these financial covenants requires EOP Partnership to apply specialized terms, the definitions of which are set forth in the related unsecured note indentures, and to calculate ratios in the manner prescribed in the indentures.
This section presents such ratios as of September 30, 2004 to show that EOP Partnership was in compliance with the applicable financial covenants contained in the unsecured note indentures, copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the EOP Partnerships periodic reports filed with the SEC. Management is not presenting these ratios and the related calculations for any other purpose or for any other period, and is not intending for these measures to otherwise provide information about EOP Partnerships financial condition or results of operations. Investors should not rely on these measures other than for the purpose of testing EOP Partnerships compliance with the financial covenants contained in the unsecured note indentures as of September 30, 2004.
Debt to Adjusted Total Assets
EOP Partnership may not, and may not permit a subsidiary to, incur any Debt, other than intercompany Debt, if, immediately after giving effect to the incurrence of such additional Debt, the aggregate principal amount of all outstanding Debt of EOP Partnership and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis determined in accordance with GAAP is greater than 60% of the sum of:
(i) Total Assets as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered in EOP Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K or Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as the case may be, most recently filed with the SEC prior to the incurrence of such additional Debt and | |
(ii) the increase or decrease in Total Assets from the end of such quarter including, without limitation, any increase in Total Assets resulting from the incurrence of such additional Debt (such increase or decrease together with EOP Partnerships Total Assets is referred to as the Adjusted Total Assets). |
Mortgage debt (excluding a net discount of
$(13,820))
|
$ | 2,633,207 | |||
Unsecured notes (excluding a net discount of
$(34,661))
|
9,003,412 | ||||
Line of credit
|
1,086,400 | ||||
EOP Partnerships share of unconsolidated
non-recourse mortgage debt
|
343,769 | ||||
Debt
|
$ | 13,066,788 | |||
Investments in real estate
|
$ | 24,961,031 | |||
Developments in process
|
68,352 | ||||
Land available for development
|
256,560 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
122,760 | ||||
Escrow deposits and restricted cash
|
75,543 | ||||
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
|
1,178,965 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets (net of
discount of $2,382)
|
171,252 | ||||
Change in cash subsequent to September 30,
2004 as a result of property dispositions
|
1,600 | ||||
Adjusted Total Assets
|
$ | 26,836,063 | |||
Ratio
|
49 | % | |||
Maximum Ratio
|
60 | % | |||
A-1
Secured Debt to Adjusted Total Assets
EOP Partnership may not, and may not permit any Subsidiary to, incur any Secured Debt of EOP Partnership or any Subsidiary if, immediately after giving effect to the incurrence of such additional Secured Debt, the aggregate principal amount of all outstanding Secured Debt of EOP Partnership and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis is greater than 40% of Adjusted Total Assets.
Mortgage debt (excluding a net discount of
$(13,820))
|
$ | 2,633,207 | |||
EOP Partnerships share of unconsolidated
non-recourse mortgage debt
|
343,769 | ||||
Secured Debt
|
$ | 2,976,976 | |||
Adjusted Total Assets
|
$ | 26,836,063 | |||
Ratio
|
11 | % | |||
Maximum Ratio
|
40 | % | |||
Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service to Annual Debt Service Charge
EOP Partnership may not, and may not permit any Subsidiary to, incur any Debt, other than intercompany Debt (provided that, in the case of Debt owed to Subsidiaries, such Debt is subordinate in right of payment to the debt securities), if the ratio of Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service to Annual Debt Service Charge (in each case as defined below) for the period consisting of the four consecutive fiscal quarters most recently ended prior to the date on which the additional Debt is to be incurred shall have been less than 1.5 to 1 on a pro forma basis after giving effect to the incurrence of such Debt and to the application of the proceeds therefrom, and calculated on the assumption that:
| such Debt and any other Debt incurred by EOP Partnership or a Subsidiary since the first day of such four-quarter period, which was outstanding at the end of such period, had been incurred at the beginning of such period and continued to be outstanding throughout such period, and the application of the proceeds of such Debt, including to refinance other Debt, had occurred at the beginning of such period; | |
| the repayment or retirement of any other Debt by EOP Partnership or a Subsidiary since the first day of such four-quarter period had been repaid or retired at the beginning of such period, except that, in determining the amount of Debt so repaid or retired, the amount of Debt under any revolving credit facility is computed based upon the average daily balance of such Debt during such period; | |
| in the case of Acquired Indebtedness or Debt incurred in connection with any acquisition since the first day of the four-quarter period, the related acquisition had occurred as of the first day of the period with the appropriate adjustments with respect to the acquisition being included in the pro forma calculation; and |
A-2
| in the case of any increase or decrease in Total Assets, or any other acquisition or disposition by EOP Partnership or any Subsidiary of any asset or group of assets, since the first day of such four-quarter period, including by merger, stock purchase or sale, or asset purchase or sale, such increase, decrease or other acquisition or disposition or any related repayment of Debt had occurred as of the first day of such period with the appropriate adjustments to revenues, expenses and Debt levels with respect to such increase, decrease or other acquisition or disposition being included in such pro forma calculation. |
Pro forma net income
|
$ | 151,377 | |||
Pro forma interest expense
|
820,279 | ||||
Pro forma amortization of mark to market
discounts/premiums
|
(3,004 | ) | |||
Pro forma provision for taxes
|
5,328 | ||||
Pro forma amortization and depreciation
|
779,066 | ||||
Pro forma charge from a change in accounting
principle
|
33,697 | ||||
Less pro forma income from investments in
unconsolidated joint ventures
|
(60,842 | ) | |||
Other noncash items (impairment charges)
|
236,670 | ||||
Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service
|
$ | 1,962,572 | |||
Pro forma interest expense
|
$ | 820,279 | |||
Pro forma amortization of mark to market
discounts/premiums
|
(3,004 | ) | |||
Annual Debt Service Charge
|
$ | 817,275 | |||
Ratio
|
2.40 | ||||
Minimum Ratio
|
1.50 | ||||
Total Unencumbered Assets to Unsecured Debt
EOP Partnership is required at all times to maintain Total Unencumbered Assets of not less than 150% of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of all outstanding Unsecured Debt of EOP Partnership and its Subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
Total undepreciated real estate assets
|
$ | 19,705,338 | |||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
122,760 | ||||
Escrow deposits and restricted cash
|
75,543 | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets (net of
discount of $2,382)
|
171,252 | ||||
Unencumbered investments in unconsolidated joint
venture properties
|
1,005,291 | ||||
Total Unencumbered Assets
|
$ | 21,080,184 | |||
Unsecured notes (excluding a net discount of
$(34,661))
|
$ | 9,003,412 | |||
Line of credit
|
1,086,400 | ||||
Unsecured Debt
|
$ | 10,089,812 | |||
Ratio
|
209 | % | |||
Minimum Ratio(a)
|
150 | % | |||
(a) | The unsecured notes assumed in the merger with Spieker Partnership are subject to a minimum ratio of 165%. |
A-3
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
EOP OPERATING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP |
By: | EQUITY OFFICE PROPERTIES TRUST |
its general partner |
Date: November 9, 2004
By: | /s/ RICHARD D. KINCAID |
|
|
Richard D. Kincaid | |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Date: November 9, 2004
By: | /s/ MARSHA C. WILLIAMS |
|
|
Marsha C. Williams | |
Executive Vice President | |
and Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Description | Location | ||||
4.1 | Indenture, dated August 29, 2000, by and between EOP Operating Limited Partnership and U.S. Bank National Association (formerly known as U.S. Bank Trust National Association) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to EOP Operating Limited Partnerships Registration Statement on Form S-3, as amended (SEC File No. 333-43530) | ||||
4.2 | First Supplemental Indenture, dated June 18, 2001, among EOP Operating Limited Partnership, Equity Office Properties Trust and U.S. Bank National Association (formerly known as U.S. Bank Trust National Association) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Equity Office Properties Trusts Registration Statement on Form S-3, as amended (SEC File No. 333-58976) | ||||
4.3 | $500,000,000 Fixed Rate Note and related Guarantee (another $300,000,000 Fixed Rate Note and related Guarantee, identical in all material respects to the $500,000,000 Fixed Rate Note, is not being filed) | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to EOP Operating Limited Partnerships Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 7, 2004 | ||||
4.4 | Floating Rate Note and related Guarantee | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to EOP Operating Limited Partnerships Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 7, 2004 | ||||
4.5 | Form of Medium-Term InterNote and related Guarantee (Fixed Rate) | Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to EOP Operating Limited Partnerships Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 15, 2004 | ||||
4.6 | Schedule of Medium-Term InterNotes (Fixed Rate) issued | Filed herewith | ||||
10.1 | Revolving Credit Agreement for $500,000,000 Bridge Revolving Credit Facility dated as of July 29, 2004, and related Guaranty of Payment | Filed herewith | ||||
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications | Filed herewith | ||||
32.1 | Section 1350 Certification | Filed herewith |