Back to GetFilings.com
1
================================================================================
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 0-26459
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
CONNECTICUT 06-1456461
----------- ----------
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
of incorporation or organization)
TWO AMERICAN LANE, P.O. BOX 5150, GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT 06831-8150
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (203) 861-1000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
(Title of Class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405
of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. [ ]
The registrant has no outstanding voting or non-voting common equity.
================================================================================
2
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
The discussion below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K contains "certain
forward-looking statements" (as such term is defined in Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that are based on the beliefs of the
Partnership, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available
to, the Partnership. A number of important factors could cause the Partnership's
actual growth, results, performance and business prospects and opportunities in
2001 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any
such forward-looking statements. These factors include, without limitation, the
factors described below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
OVERVIEW
The Fulcrum Fund Limited Partnership (formerly known as the Dennis Fund
Limited Partnership and referred to herein as the "Partnership") was formed as a
limited partnership on June 18, 1996 under the Connecticut Uniform Limited
Partnership Act (the "Partnership Act"). The Partnership maintains its principal
office at Two American Lane, P.O. Box 5150, Greenwich, Connecticut 06831-8150,
with a telephone number of (203) 861-1000. The Partnership is engaged in the
business of trading, buying, selling, spreading, swapping or otherwise
acquiring, holding or disposing of commodities, futures contracts, forward
contracts, foreign exchange commitments, exchange for physicals, swap contracts,
spot (cash) commodities and other items, options on the foregoing, and any
rights pertaining to the foregoing contracts, instruments or investments
throughout the world ("Commodities"). The objective of the Partnership's
business is appreciation of its assets through the speculative trading of
Commodities. Although currently the Partnership's activities are intended to be
limited to trading Commodities and investing capital not needed for margin
purposes in securities approved by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the
"CFTC") for investment of customer funds, the Limited Partnership Agreement of
the Partnership, dated June 18, 1996 and as amended on December 15, 1997 (the
"Partnership Agreement"), also permits the Partnership to trade (i) any security
as defined in Section 2(1) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "1933
Act"), (ii) any option, warrant or other right on or pertaining to any of the
foregoing, whether in the United States of America or anywhere else throughout
the world, and (iii) any other investment or transaction that the General
Partner (as defined herein) deems, in its sole discretion, to be consistent with
the objectives of the Partnership (with Commodities, collectively, the
"Investments").
In June 1996, the Partnership commenced a private placement of units of
limited partnership interest ("Units") in reliance on the exemptions afforded
by, among others, Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act and Rule 506 of Regulation D
promulgated thereunder. Units are offered monthly at a price per Unit equal to
the then-current Net Asset Value per Unit (as defined below) plus a selling
commission equal to 5% unless such selling commission is waived in whole or in
part. Since the Partnership began the private placement in 1996, through
December 2000, 44,573 Units had been sold for a total of $68,739,235. The
minimum subscription is $26,250 for new investors other than Employee Benefit
Plans (as defined herein) or $10,500 for Employee Benefit Plans and existing
limited partners of the Partnership ("Limited Partners"), which amounts include
selling commissions of $1,250 and $500 respectively. "Net Asset Value" of the
2
3
Partnership in general means total assets of the Partnership, including, but not
limited to, all cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest, earned discount,
and open Commodities positions, less total liabilities, including, but not
limited to, brokerage commissions that would be payable with respect to the
closing of open Commodities positions, all as determined in accordance with the
principles set forth in the Partnership Agreement or, where no such principles
are specified therein, in accordance with United States generally accepted
accounting principles applied on a consistent basis ("GAAP"). "Net Asset Value
per Unit" means the Net Asset Value of the Partnership divided by the number of
Units outstanding as of the date of determination. The value of all Commodities
shall be the market value thereof. The market value of a Commodity traded on an
exchange shall be based upon the settlement price on the exchange on the date of
determination; provided, however, that if a Commodity could not be liquidated on
the day with respect to which the assets of the Partnership are being
determined, the settlement price on the first subsequent day on which the
contract could be liquidated shall be the basis for determining the liquidating
value thereof. The market value of a forward contract, a swap contract, or any
other off-exchange contract, instrument, or transaction shall mean its market
value as determined by the General Partner on a basis consistently applied.
Investors receive a Confidential Private Placement Memorandum and
Disclosure Document (the "Disclosure Document") which sets forth the material
terms of the investment. The Disclosure Document is updated every nine (9)
months or upon any material change (whichever is sooner), as required by the
regulations promulgated under the Commodity Exchange Act, as amended (the
"CEAct"), and filed with the CFTC for compliance therewith.
Since October, 1996, the Partnership has engaged in the speculative
trading of Investments and will continue to do so until its dissolution and
liquidation, which will occur on the earlier of December 31, 2026 or the
occurrence of any of the events set forth in Article VIII, Section 8.1 of the
Partnership Agreement.
The Partnership's general partner, Kenmar Advisory Corp. (the "General
Partner"), is a Connecticut corporation formed in September 1983 as a New York
corporation and subsequently reorganized as a Connecticut corporation in January
1996. Kenneth A. Shewer is its Chairman, and Marc S. Goodman is its President.
Messrs. Shewer and Goodman are the General Partner's sole directors. All of the
General Partner's stock is owned directly by Kenmar Holdings Inc., which is
ultimately owned, indirectly and equally, by Messrs. Shewer and Goodman. The
General Partner has been registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator
("CPO") and has been a member in good standing of the National Futures
Association (the "NFA") in such capacity since February 1984. The registration
of the General Partner with the CFTC and its membership in the NFA must not be
taken as an indication that any such agency or self-regulatory body has
recommended or approved either the General Partner or the Partnership.
Under the Partnership Agreement, responsibility for managing the
Partnership is vested solely in the General Partner. The Limited Partners will
not participate in the management or operations of the Partnership. Any
participation by a Limited Partner in the management of the Partnership may
jeopardize the limited liability of such Limited Partner. Responsibilities of
the General Partner include, but are not limited to, the following: selecting
and monitoring the commodity broker(s); determining whether the Partnership will
make distributions; administering redemptions of Units; preparing periodic and
annual reports to the Limited
3
4
Partners; preparing reports, filings, registrations, and other documents
required by applicable regulatory bodies, exchanges or boards; depositing the
Partnership's assets in the form of cash in an account or accounts at banks or
brokers selected by the General Partner; borrowing money (but only in connection
with making or taking delivery of a Commodity); directing the investment of the
Partnership's assets; executing various documents on behalf of the Partnership
and the Limited Partners pursuant to the power of attorney described below; and
supervising the liquidation of the Partnership if an event causing termination
of the Partnership occurs. To facilitate the execution of various documents by
the General Partner on behalf of the Partnership, each of the Limited Partners
appoints the General Partner, with full power of substitution, such Limited
Partner's attorney-in-fact by executing the Signature Page of the Partnership
Agreement and Power of Attorney and by becoming a Limited Partner.
The Partnership itself does not have any employees. Rather, the General
Partner, in its capacity as a CFTC-regulated CPO, employs 31 persons as of
December 31, 2000 and provides the Partnership with the services of certain
personnel to conduct its operational activities.
Effective November 1, 2000, the commodity trading advisor ("CTA") to
the Partnership is Beacon Management Corporation ("Beacon"), a Delaware
corporation and registered CTA and CPO (the "Advisor"). Prior to that time, the
Partnership's commodity trading advisor was the Dennis Trading Group. The
Advisor is responsible for making the trading decisions for the Partnership. In
addition, the Partnership, effective November 1, 2000, hired the Volatility
Hedge Program of Stonebrook Structured Products, LLC ("Stonebrook"), an overlay
program designed to hedge the positions of traditional trend-following programs
during periods identified by Stonebrook's systems as "high risk." Investors
should note that the Advisor is the sole advisor for the Partnership and that
Stonebrook's Volatility Hedge Program is the primary mechanism for limiting the
risks inherent in Beacon's trading strategy.
The Partnership is not an operating company with "traditional" income
or expenses. It is a stand-alone investment vehicle that offers investors the
opportunity to participate in the futures markets under the guidance of a
professional CTA.
The General Partner has complete discretionary authority regarding the
admission of additional Limited Partners and may admit additional Limited
Partners under terms and conditions comparable to or different from those under
which the existing Limited Partners were solicited.
FEES AND EXPENSES
Except as otherwise noted, the fees and expenses described are for
investors who subscribe for Units on or after April 1, 1997. During the quarter
ended December 31, 2000, the Partnership redeemed all of its Units subscribed
for prior to April 1, 1997 (the "Redemption"). Limited Partners who subscribed
for Units prior to April 1, 1997 had been charged different Advisor fees and
continued to be charged those fees on those Units purchased prior to that date.
As a result of the Redemption, all owners of Units pay the same Advisor fees as
described below.
4
5
FEES TO THE GENERAL PARTNER
OFFERING FEE. For managing the continuing offering of Units, as of the
end of each month, the Partnership currently pays to the General Partner a fee
(the "Offering Fee") equal to 0.25% (3% annually) of that month's beginning Net
Asset Value of the Partnership except that the Offering Fee for Million Dollar
Investors will equal 0.0833% (1% annually) of each month's beginning Net Asset
Value of the Partnership. A Million Dollar Investor will be charged the reduced
Offering Fee by receiving a rebate equal to two-thirds of the Offering Fee. The
amount of this reduction will be rebated monthly by the General Partner to the
Partnership for the benefit of such Million Dollar Investor in the form of
additional Units. A "Million Dollar Investor" is an investor whose aggregate
investment in the Partnership (net of redemptions and excluding any appreciation
and/or depreciation in Net Asset Value) equals or exceeds $1,000,000. The
General Partner, in its sole and absolute discretion, will determine whether an
investment or series of investments qualifies for treatment as a Million Dollar
Investor. The General Partner, in its sole discretion, is authorized to set its
compensation for managing the continuing offering of Units. For additional
information on the General Partner's authority, see "Conflicts of Interest --
The General Partner" below.
ADVISORY FEES. As compensation for managing the Partnership, the
General Partner currently receives 22.5% of the management and incentive fee of
the Advisor and all of the incentive fee of Stonebrook. See "Fees to the Advisor
and Stonebrook" below.
Out of all compensation paid to the General Partner, the General
Partner may also pay selling agents additional selling compensation and/or
compensation for ongoing services up to 3% annually.
FEES TO THE ADVISOR AND STONEBROOK
MANAGEMENT FEES. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement (as defined
herein), the Partnership currently pays to the Advisor and Stonebrook a monthly
management fee (the "Management Fee"). The monthly Management Fee (i) payable to
the Advisor is equal to 1/6 of 1% (2% annually) of the Net Asset Value of the
Partnership and (ii) payable to Stonebrook is 1/12 of 1% (1% annually) of the
Net Asset Value of the Partnership. The Management Fees paid for the years ended
December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998 and 1997 and for the period from inception to
December 31,1996 are set forth in a table on page 7 of this Form 10-K.
INCENTIVE FEES. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Partnership
currently pays (i) to the Advisor a quarterly incentive fee equal to 20% of the
Net New Trading Profits and (ii) to Stonebrook a quarterly incentive fee equal
to 10% of the Net New Trading Profits. The incentive fees paid for the years
ended December 31, 2000, 1999, 1998 and 1997 and for the period from inception
to December 31, 1996 are set forth in a table on page 7 of this Form 10-K.
"Net New Trading Profits" in general means the net trading profits
(realized and change, if any, in unrealized) earned on the Partnership's net
assets (excluding interest or interest-equivalent income), decreased by
brokerage commissions (paid and change, if any, in accrued) and the Management
Fee, with all such items determined from the first day of the calendar
5
6
quarter that immediately follows the last calendar quarter for which an
incentive fee was earned by the Advisor (or, if no incentive fee was earned
previously by the Advisor, from the commencement of trading) to the close of
business on the last day of the calendar quarter with respect to which such
incentive fee calculation was made. Operating expenses of the Partnership do not
reduce Net New Trading Profits when calculating the Advisor's incentive fee.
Pursuant to arrangements between the Advisor, Stonebrook and the
General Partner: (i) the Advisor receives 77.5% and the General Partner 22.5% of
the management and incentive fees payable to the Advisor, (ii) Stonebrook
receives all of the management fees payable to Stonebrook, and (iii) the General
Partner receives 100% of the incentive fee payable to Stonebrook.
OTHER FEES AND EXPENSES
BROKERAGE COMMISSIONS. The Partnership's current brokerage commission
expense is $10 per roundturn transaction plus administrative "give-up" fees.
ADMINISTRATIVE AND ONGOING OPERATING FEES AND EXPENSES. The Partnership
will pay all administrative and ongoing operating fees and expenses. Ordinary
administrative expenses include, but are not limited to, accounting, auditing,
record keeping, administration, computer and clerical expenses (including
expenses incurred in preparing reports and tax information to Limited Partners
and regulatory authorities, printing and duplication expenses and mailing
expenses), legal fees and expenses and other expenses incurred by such persons
and by the General Partner and its affiliates in providing services to the
Partnership. Legal fees and expenses include outside counsel's fax and copying
charges and other disbursements (such as filing fees, whether paid by the
General Partner or outside counsel). Such fees were approximately 0.5%
(annualized) of the Net Asset Value of the Partnership for 2000 and are not
expected to exceed 0.5% of the Net Asset Value of the Partnership per year.
EXTRAORDINARY EXPENSES. The Partnership is responsible for all
extraordinary expenses (e.g., litigation expenses) incurred on behalf of the
Partnership. As of December 31, 2000, the Partnership has not paid, and does not
anticipate paying, any extraordinary expenses.
OTHER EXPENSES OF THE LIMITED PARTNERS
Although not an expense of the Partnership, investors may be subject to
a selling commission, payable to independent selling agents, equal to 5% of the
then-current Net Asset Value per Unit unless the payment of all or any portion
of such amount is waived.
The Partnership furnishes each subscriber with monthly statements and a
certified annual report of financial condition covering certain aspects of the
Partnership's operations.
The following chart reflects the actual fees and expenses for the
periods presented.
6
7
PERIOD JUNE 18, 1996
(INCEPTION) TO
2000 1999 1998 1997 DECEMBER 31, 1996
---- ---- ---- ---- --------------------
Brokerage
Commissions $4,349,404 $ 2,676,283 $ 1,400,182 $ 943,428 $25,235
Management Fees 746,501 877,660 482,628 219,334 13,548
Incentive Fees 462,919 2,103,117 3,229,070 702,920 0
General Partner's
Offering Fees 1,208,141 1,461,667 748,537 324,867 20,516
Operating Expenses 348,230 243,034 135,589 79,101 19,825
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
There are substantial and inherent conflicts of interest in the
structure of the Partnership which are, on their face, inconsistent with the
fiduciary duties of the General Partner. Prospective investors should be aware
that the General Partner presently intends to assert that Limited Partners have,
by investing in the Partnership, consented to the following conflicts of
interest in the event of any proceeding alleging that such conflicts violated
any duty owed by the General Partner and its affiliates ("Kenmar") to investors.
THE GENERAL PARTNER
The General Partner, in its sole discretion, is authorized under the
Partnership Agreement to set the compensation it shall receive for its services
as general partner of the Partnership. The General Partner may change its
compensation to such amount and/or in such forms as the General Partner, in its
sole discretion, shall determine without the consent of the Limited Partners;
provided that the General Partner has given the Limited Partners ninety (90)
days' prior written notice of such change. As such, the General Partner has a
conflict of interest between limiting fees paid by the Partnership and
generating fees for itself.
Kenmar currently manages other commodity pools and managed accounts,
each with a different combination of trading advisors, and intends to continue
to solicit and manage the trading for these other commodity pools and managed
accounts. Thus, Kenmar may be subject to conflicting demands in respect of
allocating management time, services and other functions between the activities
the General Partner has undertaken with respect to the Partnership and the
activities Kenmar has undertaken or will undertake with respect to other
investors, commodity pools, managed accounts and/or trading advisors. As another
consequence, the greater the amount of assets managed by Kenmar, the more
difficult it may be for the General Partner to maintain the quality of these
services.
7
8
The General Partner and the Broker (as defined herein) maintain a
business relationship unrelated to their efforts on behalf of the Partnership.
Thus, the General Partner has a conflict between its responsibility to negotiate
an amount and form of compensation to be paid to the Broker that best serves the
Partnership's interests and the General Partner's desire to maintain its
business relationship with the Broker. In addition, the General Partner may
receive a brokerage commission rebate from the Broker.
The General Partner and the Advisor maintain a business relationship
unrelated to their efforts on behalf of the Partnership. A substantial amount of
the assets under the management of the Advisor are assets of pools and accounts
managed by the General Partner or an affiliate. Thus, the General Partner has a
conflict between its responsibility to negotiate an amount and form of
compensation to be paid to the Advisor that best serves the Partnership's
interests and the General Partner's desire to maintain its business relationship
with the Advisor.
Neither the General Partner nor any of its affiliates, principals,
directors, officers or employees (the "Related Persons") trade Commodities for
their own accounts, although it is possible that they may do so in the future.
The records of such trading and any written policies related thereto would not
be available to the Limited Partners. If the General Partner or a Related Person
were to trade for their own accounts, they could take positions either similar
or opposite to positions taken by the Partnership, and/or the Partnership and
such Related Persons could from time to time be competing for similar
Commodities. Orders placed by the General Partner or a Related Person to trade
Commodities for their proprietary accounts may reach the market either before or
after similar orders are placed for the Partnership and this difference in
timing may result in the Partnership receiving less favorable (or more
favorable) prices than those received by such proprietary accounts. Neither the
General Partner nor any Related Person places orders for the Advisor and,
therefore, neither the General Partner nor any Related Person has control over
such timing. It is also possible that the positions taken by such proprietary
accounts may not be held for the same period of time as those positions taken by
the Partnership. Thus, it is unlikely that trading results in such proprietary
accounts would be the same as the performance in the Partnership's account.
The Partnership and the General Partner are affiliated entities and are
represented by the same counsel, Katten Muchin Zavis, Chicago, Illinois. No
independent experts or professionals have been retained on behalf of the Limited
Partners. To the extent that Limited Partners would benefit by further
independent representation, that benefit will not be available to Limited
Partners and they should seek independent counsel.
THE ADVISOR
The Advisory Agreement (as defined herein) allows the Advisor and its
principals to manage other commodity pools and managed accounts as well as trade
for its own proprietary accounts. Since the Advisor trades other accounts, the
Advisor is subject to conflicting demands in respect of allocating management
time, services and other functions between the Partnership and such other
accounts. In particular, the Advisor may have a conflict of interest when
rendering advice to the Partnership because its compensation for managing some
other account may differ from its compensation for managing the Partnership's
account, and therefore may provide an incentive to favor such other account.
8
9
The Advisor may in the future develop and furnish to, or employ on
behalf of, other investors trading methods or strategies for trading similar to
or different from those employed and traded on behalf of the Partnership's
account and pursuant to which such other investors may take positions similar to
or opposite from positions taken by the Partnership. No assurance may be given
that the trading results in such other accounts will be the same as or similar
to the performance in the Partnership's account.
The Advisor and its employees trade Commodities for their own accounts.
The records of such trading and any written policies related thereto will not be
available for inspection by Limited Partners. Such trading activity could differ
from the trading activity of the Partnership. For example, the trading positions
taken and the length of time such positions are held by the Partnership could
differ from those taken with respect to such proprietary accounts. In addition,
such proprietary accounts could be charged brokerage commissions in a
significantly different form and amount than those charged the Partnership and,
as a result, the Advisor could be more or less likely to modify, liquidate or
open a position for that account than for the Partnership's account. Orders for
trades for such proprietary accounts could be placed either before or after
similar orders are placed for the Advisor's investor accounts, and this
difference in timing could result in the investor accounts receiving less
favorable (or more favorable) prices than those received by such proprietary
accounts. Thus, no assurance may be given that the trading results in such
proprietary accounts will be similar to the performance in the Partnership's
account.
The CFTC and certain United States commodity exchanges have established
"speculative position limits" that limit the net long or net short speculative
position any person(s) may hold, own or control in a particular Commodity on any
given day. An Advisor and its principal(s) may, on any given day, trade up to
the position limit established by such regulatory authorities and, therefore,
might be unable to trade those Commodities for the Partnership. The effect of
speculative position limits may be to preclude the Advisor and, consequently,
the Partnership, from taking potentially profitable positions, thereby reducing
the profit potential of the Partnership.
THE BROKER
The Broker effects transactions for other customers (including public
and private commodity pools) who may compete with the Partnership's
transactions, including with respect to priorities of order entry. In addition,
employees of the Broker may trade for their own accounts. Since the identities
of the purchaser and seller are not disclosed until after the trade, it is
possible that a Broker could effect transactions for the Partnership in which
the other parties to the transactions are that Broker's officers, directors,
employees, customers or affiliates. Such persons might also compete with the
Partnership in making purchases or sales of Commodities without knowing that the
Partnership is also bidding on such Commodities. Since orders are filled in the
order in which they are received by a particular floor broker, transactions for
any of such persons might be executed when similar trades for the Partnership
are not executed or are executed at less favorable prices. However, in entering
orders for the Partnership and such other customer accounts, the Broker will
attempt to achieve an equitable treatment of all accounts, including with
respect to priorities of order entry and allocations of executed trades. In
addition,
9
10
CFTC regulations prohibit a futures commission merchant ("FCM") from utilizing
its knowledge of one customer's trades for its own or its other customers'
benefit.
RECOURSE BY LIMITED PARTNERS
In evaluating the foregoing potential and actual conflicts of interest,
an investor should be aware that the General Partner will have a responsibility
to the Limited Partners to exercise good faith and fairness in all dealings
affecting the Partnership. The responsibility of a general partner to limited
partners is a changing area of the law and Limited Partners who have questions
concerning the responsibilities of the General Partner should consult their
legal counsel. In the event that a Limited Partner believes that the General
Partner has violated its responsibilities, the Limited Partner may seek legal
relief for himself and all other similarly situated Limited Partners or on
behalf of the Partnership under applicable laws to recover damages from, or to
require an accounting by, the General Partner. Furthermore, Limited Partners are
afforded certain rights to institute reparation proceedings under the CEAct for
violations of the CEAct or of any rule, regulation or order of the CFTC by the
General Partner or the Broker. A Limited Partner may also institute legal
proceedings in court against the General Partner, the Broker or the Advisor for
certain violations of the CEAct or rules, regulations or orders of the CFTC.
Excessive trading of the Partnership's account has been held to constitute a
violation of the antifraud provisions of the CEAct. Limited Partners should be
aware that it may be difficult to establish that excessive trading has occurred
due to the broad trading discretion given to the General Partner in the
Partnership Agreement and the Advisor in the Advisory Agreement, exculpatory
provisions in the Partnership Agreement and in the Advisory Agreement, and the
lack of definitive standards in judicial and administrative decisions as to what
constitutes excessive trading.
Under the exculpatory provisions of the Partnership Agreement, the
General Partner shall not be liable to the Partnership or to any of the Partners
except by reason of acts or omissions constituting fraud, willful misconduct,
gross negligence or bad faith. Limited Partners may have a more limited right of
action than they would absent such limitations. The Partnership has agreed to
indemnify the General Partner and its Limited Partners, officers, directors,
employees, and agents against any loss, liability, damage, cost, or expense
resulting from any claim, action, or proceeding relating to the business or
activities undertaken by them on behalf of the Partnership or actions taken or
omitted to be taken by the General Partner in its capacity as such; provided
that the conduct of such person did not constitute willful malfeasance or gross
negligence and was done in good faith and in a manner reasonably believed to be
in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the Partnership. In any action
brought by a Limited Partner in the right of the Partnership to which the
General Partner or any other person indemnified pursuant to the foregoing are
party defendants, any such person will be indemnified by the Partnership only to
the extent and subject to the conditions specified in the Partnership Act.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in any action brought by a Limited
Partner in the right of the Partnership to which the General Partner or any
other person indemnified pursuant to the foregoing are party defendants, any
such person will be indemnified by the Partnership only to the extent and
subject to the conditions specified in the Partnership Act. Also,
indemnification of the General Partner or its affiliates by the Partnership will
be limited for losses and liabilities resulting from violations of United States
Federal, state or foreign securities law in connection with the offer or sale of
Units. The CFTC has issued a statement of policy relating to
10
11
indemnification of officers and directors of an FCM (such as the Broker) and its
controlling persons under which the CFTC has taken the position that whether
such an indemnification is consistent with the policies expressed in the CEAct
will be determined by the CFTC on a case-by-case basis.
COMMODITIES TRADING GENERALLY
TRADING COMMODITIES IS SPECULATIVE AND VOLATILE
The profitability of the Partnership will depend primarily on the
Advisor's ability to predict fluctuations in Commodity prices. Such prices are
highly volatile and, in general, are influenced by a number of external factors,
including, but not limited to, changing supply and demand relationships;
agricultural, trade, fiscal, monetary and exchange control programs and policies
of governments; national and/or international political and economic events and
policies; and changes in interest rates. Certain additional factors may also
affect individual Commodities or certain groups of Commodities. For example,
currency Commodities are influenced by, among other things, political events
(including restrictions on local exchanges or markets, limitations on
investments in a country or on investment by residents of a country in other
countries, and restrictions on currency flows); changes in balances of payments
and trade; rates of inflation; international trade restrictions; currency
devaluations and revaluations; and governmental intervention (which is often
intended to influence prices directly). Metal Commodities can be affected by,
among other things, production and, particularly with respect to gold
Commodities, governmental regulation. Agricultural Commodities are influenced
by, among other things, unexpected weather, damage by insects or plant diseases
and/or unexpected purchases by countries. The above list does not include all of
the factors that influence the price of various Commodities or discuss how much
influence each of those factors has on such prices. Volatile price movements may
result in unprofitable trading by the Advisor, thereby resulting in losses to
the Partnership.
TRADING COMMODITIES IS HIGHLY LEVERAGED
To trade futures contracts a trader is not required to deposit funds
equal to the value of the futures contract; rather, the trader need only make a
deposit, called an "initial margin deposit", equal to a small percentage
(typically between 2% and 15%) of the value of the futures contract. As a
result, a relatively small adverse move in the price of a futures contract may
result in immediate and substantial losses to a trader. For example, if at the
time of purchase 10% of the price of a futures contract is deposited as margin,
a 10% decrease in the price of that contract would, if the contract were then
closed out, result in a total loss of the initial margin deposit (brokerage
commissions and other transaction costs also would be incurred). A decrease of
more than 10% would result in a loss of more than the total initial margin
deposit.
Trading in the currency forward and interbank markets does not require
margin but generally does require the extension of credit by a bank to those
with whom that bank trades. The General Partner does not anticipate that the
banks with which the Broker (or other commodity broker) and the Partnership may
trade will require margin with respect to the trading of currencies. However, to
ensure payment by the Partnership on currency contracts, the Broker (or other
commodity broker) will generally require margin in amounts approximately
equivalent
11
12
to those required for trading foreign currency futures contracts on United
States exchanges when the Partnership trades the same currencies for which
futures contracts are traded on such exchanges and amounts that may be higher
than such exchange margin requirements when the Partnership trades world
currencies for which no futures contracts are traded on such exchanges. Thus, as
with futures contracts, a relatively small adverse move in the price of a
forward contract may result in a loss of an amount equal to or greater than the
amount deposited. To some extent, options are even more highly leveraged than
either futures or forward contracts. For example, if an in-the-money call (put)
option is sold for its intrinsic value plus a premium representing the time
value of that option, a 10% rise (drop) in the value of the underlying futures
contract or physical commodity (the "Underlying Interest") does not create a
loss equal to just 10% of the value of the option; rather it creates a loss
approximately equal to 10% of the value of the Underlying Interest, less the
time value, which loss may be many times greater than the price for which a
trader sold the option. In addition, a trader who sells options is required only
to deposit a percentage of the value of the option at the time of sale as
margin, thereby leveraging the investment even further.
Thus, like other leveraged investments, any purchase or sale of certain
Commodities may result in losses in excess of the amount invested. Investors
should note, however, that while the Partnership's assets are subject to losses
in excess of margin deposits, a Limited Partner cannot lose more than his
unredeemed capital contribution, undistributed profits (if any) and, under
certain limited circumstances, capital distributed to him or received by him
upon redemption, with interest thereon.
TRADING COMMODITIES MAY BE ILLIQUID
While the Partnership normally will trade only Commodities that have
sufficient liquidity to enable the Partnership to enter and close out positions
without causing value price movements, there is no assurance that intervening
events, such as an exchange or the CFTC suspending trading in a particular
futures contract, ordering immediate liquidation or settlement of a particular
futures contract or ordering trading in a particular futures contract be
conducted for liquidation only, will not render a once-liquid Commodity
illiquid.
In addition, most United States commodity exchanges limit the amount by
which certain Commodities may move during a single day by regulations referred
to as "daily price fluctuation limits", or "daily limits". Pursuant to such
regulations, no trades may be executed on any given day at prices beyond the
daily limits. The price of a futures contract has occasionally moved the daily
limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading, thereby
effectively preventing a party from liquidating his position.
Similarly, trading options may become illiquid if trading in the
Underlying Interest becomes illiquid. Also, it is possible that major banks may,
from time to time, effectively stop making markets in certain currency forward
contracts or that governments may intervene to stabilize or fix exchange rates
or impose credit controls, thereby restricting or substantially eliminating
trading in the affected currencies.
While the occurrence of such events may reduce or effectively eliminate
the liquidity of a particular market, they do not limit ultimate losses, and may
in fact substantially increase losses
12
13
because of this inability to liquidate unfavorable positions. In addition, if
there is little or no trading in a particular futures or forward contract that
the Partnership is trading, whether such illiquidity is caused by any of the
above reasons or otherwise, the Partnership may be unable to execute trades at
favorable prices and/or may be unable or unwilling to liquidate its position
prior to its expiration date, thereby requiring the Partnership to make or take
delivery of the Underlying Interest.
TRADING FORWARD CONTRACTS
The Partnership may trade forward contracts in certain items (such as
currencies and metals) with United States and foreign banks and dealers.
A forward contract is a contractual obligation to purchase or sell a
specified quantity of a Commodity at or before a specified date in the future at
a specified price and, therefore, is similar to a futures contract. Forward
contracts, however, are not traded on exchanges and, as a consequence, investors
in forward contracts are not afforded the regulatory protections of such
exchanges or the CFTC; rather, banks and dealers act as principals in such
markets. Neither the CFTC nor banking authorities regulate trading in forward
contracts on currencies, and non-United States banks may not be regulated by any
United States governmental agency. The principals who deal in the forward
contract markets are not required to continue to make markets in the forward
contracts they trade. There have been periods during which certain participants
in forward markets have refused to quote prices for contracts or have quoted
prices with an unusually wide spread between the price at which they are
prepared to buy and that at which they are prepared to sell.
The Partnership may trade forward contracts with and through a limited
number of entities. As a result, liquidity problems might be greater in the
Partnership's forward trading than would be the case if trades were to be placed
with and through a larger number of forward market participants. The imposition
of exchange and credit controls or the fixing of currency exchange rates by
governmental authorities (e.g., Latin American countries) might eliminate or
substantially reduce trading in certain currencies and might limit such forward
trading to less than the amount that the Advisor would otherwise recommend, to
the possible detriment of the Partnership. See "Trading Commodities May be
Illiquid" above. The amount of loss that may be claimed for tax purposes in
respect of the Partnership's unprofitable forward trades may be limited by the
loss limitation rules applicable to straddles. See "Income Tax Aspects".
Because performance under forward contracts is not guaranteed by any
exchange or clearinghouse, the Partnership will be subject to the risk of the
inability, or refusal by, the counterparty to perform with respect to such
contracts. Any such failure or refusal, whether due to insolvency, bankruptcy or
other causes, could subject the Broker (or other commodity broker) and in turn
the Partnership to substantial losses. The Broker (or other commodity broker)
and the Partnership will not be excused from the performance of any forward
contracts into which they have entered due to the default of third parties in
respect of other forward trades in the Advisor's trading strategies that were to
have substantially offset such contracts.
In addition, the CFTC has been studying the regulatory propriety of
"exchange of futures for physicals" or "EFP" transactions, whereby traders are
able to exchange positions in the
13
14
forward markets for ones on regulated exchanges on a 24-hour basis. If the
Partnership's ability to engage in such transactions were restricted, trading
techniques that may be employed by the Advisor might be impaired to the
potential detriment of the Partnership.
TRADING OPTIONS
Options on futures contracts and physical commodities are traded on
United States and foreign exchanges. A call (put) option grants the purchaser
thereof the right, but not the obligation, to buy (sell) the Underlying Interest
during a certain period of time for a fixed price. An option is purchased for
its intrinsic value, if any, plus a premium, representing the time value of that
option. Unless the price of the Underlying Interest increases (decreases) by at
least the time value of that option, the Partnership may lose the entire amount
of such premium. (The more out-of-the-money an option is, the greater the
increase (decrease) would have to be before the Partnership would recover the
entire amount of such premium.) Conversely, if the Partnership sells an option
(whether a call or a put), it will be credited with the sales price but will
have to deposit margin due to its contingent liability to make or take delivery
of the Underlying Interest in the event the option is exercised. A trader who
sells options may be subject to loss in an amount equal to the entire price
movement that occurs in the Underlying Interest (less any premium received) from
the date he sold the option until the date he liquidates such position. The
ability to trade or exercise options may be restricted in the event that trading
in the Underlying Interest becomes restricted. Options trading on United States
commodity exchanges is subject to regulation by both the CFTC and such
exchanges. Options trading on foreign exchanges is not regulated by the CFTC.
TRADING ON NON-UNITED STATES EXCHANGES
The Partnership may trade Commodities on exchanges located outside of
the United States, where CFTC regulations and other protections customary on
United States exchanges may not apply. The Advisor has limited experience
trading on non-United States exchanges and markets. The collapse of Baring
Securities Limited ("Barings") in early 1995, which was caused by a Barings
trader making a series of large, unauthorized and unprofitable trades in
Japanese stock index futures and options contracts on the Singapore
International Monetary Exchange and various Japanese exchanges, illustrated some
of the potential risks of trading on foreign contract markets. Although,
ultimately, customer funds were recovered, the Barings collapse, and much of the
initial uncertainty regarding the disposition of customer funds and positions,
may have been avoided had these foreign markets established certain regulatory
practices and financial safeguards that exist in the United States, such as
omnibus account reporting, strict customer funds segregation, position transfer
mechanisms, and risk assessment and audit procedures.
In contrast to United States exchanges, some non-United States
exchanges are "principals' markets" in which performance with respect to a
contract is the responsibility only of the individual member with whom the
trader has entered into a contract. In the case of its trading on non-United
States exchanges, the Partnership will be subject to the risk of the inability
of, or refusal by, the counterparty to perform with respect to such contracts.
Any such failure could subject the Partnership to substantial losses or
substantial reductions of the profits it might otherwise have realized.
14
15
The Partnership will determine the Partnership's assets in United
States dollars. Unless the Partnership hedges itself against fluctuations in
exchange rates between the United States dollar and the currencies in which
trading is done on such non-United States exchanges, any profits that the
Partnership might realize in such trading could be eliminated as a result of
adverse changes in exchange rates, and the Partnership could even incur losses
as a result of any such changes. The Partnership, in general, does not intend to
hedge itself against such fluctuations.
TRADING FACILITIES AND ELECTRONIC TRADING
Most open-outcry and electronic trading facilities are supported by
computer-based component systems for the order-routing, execution, matching,
registration and clearing of trades. As with all facilities and systems, they
are vulnerable to disruption or failure. The Partnership's ability to recover
losses may be subject to limits on liability imposed by the system provider, the
market, the clearing house and/or member firms.
Trading on an electronic system may differ not only from trading in an
open-outcry market but also from trading on other electronic systems. If the
Partnership undertakes transactions on an electronic trading system, the
Partnership will be exposed to risks associated with the system including the
failure of hardware and software. The result of any system failure may be that
the Partnership's order is either not executed according to its instructions or
is not executed at all.
THE ADVISOR AND STONEBROOK
The Advisor is responsible for making the trading decisions for the
Partnership. In addition, the Partnership, effective November 1, 2000, hired
Stonebrook's Volatility Hedge Program, an overlay program designed to hedge the
positions of traditional trend-following programs during periods identified by
Stonebrook's systems as "high risk." Investors should note that the Advisor is
the sole advisor for the Partnership and that Stonebrook's Volatility Hedge
Program is the primary mechanism for limiting the risks inherent in Beacon's
trading strategy.
The Advisor and Stonebrook have prepared the following descriptions.
These descriptions are summaries and are therefore qualified in their entirety
by reference to the detailed descriptions contained in the Advisor's and
Stonebrook's disclosure documents, copies of which may be obtained by a
prospective investor upon request to the General Partner. Due to the
confidential and/or proprietary nature of most of the information, such as
trading methods and strategies and the performance tables, the General Partner
is relying on the Advisor and Stonebrook for the accuracy thereof.
THE ADVISOR
Beacon Management Corporation has been selected as the Partnership's
Advisor for its aggressive trading program (Meka), which offers the potential
for high returns, albeit with commensurate risk. The Advisor employs a
computerized system to determine trading signals. This system can be considered
a "longer-term, technical trend-following" system. The nature of
15
16
such long-term, trend-following systems, in general, is that they are most
vulnerable, or "at risk", as trends mature and prices become overextended.
During these periods, when prices move swiftly in a CTA's favor, large
unrealized profits accrue while exit (stop) levels remain far from the current
market price. Thus, when these trends reverse, trend-following systems often
suffer large givebacks of unrealized gains. Thus, performance of technical
trend-following systems can be quite cyclical and, with aggressive strategies
such as Meka, volatile.
In an effort to address the potential for high volatility in the
Advisor's Meka program, an additional advisor has been selected. This advisor,
Stonebrook Structured Products LLC, will serve as the Partnership's "Overlay
Provider" through use of its Volatility Hedge Program ("VHP"). VHP is an overlay
program designed to pinpoint high-risk periods in market trends and to "hedge"
the high-risk positions of a trend-following program in an effort to mitigate
risk and improve the overall risk: return profile relative to that of a
stand-alone, trend-following program. VHP is a fully systematized, long-only,
options-based trading program that hedges those positions identified by VHP as
being at a high risk for trend reversal. Options are purchased (never sold) to
hedge the high-risk positions of the underlying trend-following program -- in
this case, the Advisor's Meka program. VHP generally trades infrequently, and
only during the highest-risk situations as identified by the VHP system.
It must be underscored that the inclusion of VHP does not change the
overall aggressive nature of the Partnership nor the high risk that accompanies
the potential for high returns. There is no assurance that Stonebrook's VHP
program will hedge every position during every trend - VHP trades only under the
most unique conditions. As a result, the Partnership's risk on Meka's
performance may not be improved (i.e., lowered) through the inclusion of VHP
during any one specific losing period or on any individual trade. The inclusion
of VHP is intended to improve, over the long-term, the Partnership's overall
volatility relative to the volatility of the Meka program alone, and thus to
improve the Partnership's overall risk-adjusted returns. VHP may not improve
every measure of risk - for example, using VHP may not mitigate the
peak-to-valley drawdown of Meka alone. In fact, no representation can be made
that VHP will have any positive impact on the Partnership's performance at all.
BEACON MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Beacon Management Corporation is a Delaware corporation located at 47
Hulfish Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08542, with telephone number 609-924-5395.
The Advisor offers managed trading programs in futures and options. The Advisor
develops and implements computer systems that integrate futures research,
trading, money management, and investment accounting. The principals of the
Advisor are Grant W. Schaumburg Jr., Mark S. Stratton, Thomas J. Nash and Karen
L. Zaramba, John W. Fryback and John C. Plimpton.
The Advisor continues the futures trading advisory business formerly
conducted by Beacon Management Corporation N.V., a Netherlands Antilles
corporation formed by Commodities Corporation in September 1982, and by Comtrade
Associates, a partnership founded in 1977. The Advisor began trading client
accounts in July 1980 and currently manages approximately $130 million. The
Advisor is registered as a commodity trading advisor and commodity pool
16
17
operator and is a member of the National Futures Association. Comtrade
Associates registered as a commodity trading advisor in June 1978, and the
Advisor registered in September 1982.
DESCRIPTION OF MEKA PROGRAM
The Meka program aggressively invests in a broad array of globally
diversified assets using proprietary trading systems and portfolio allocation
software. The program's objective is to use diversification and leverage to earn
long-run returns from a variety of markets. Meka is executed in the futures
markets, which provide excellent liquidity, facilitate asset allocation shifts,
and offer flexible leverage. Meka generally maintains investments in the
following markets:
o global equity indices, such as U.S. large and small cap, Japanese,
Australian, and European markets;
o global bonds indices, such as U.S. long and intermediate Treasuries,
and European bonds;
o currency cross rates, such as the U.S. dollar vs. the Japanese Yen, the
Euro, the British Pound, the Canadian Dollar, and the Australian
dollar;
o energy markets, such as crude oil, gasoline, and natural gas;
o metals, such as gold, silver, and copper; and
o world commodity markets, such as grains, meats, coffee, and sugar.
The implementation of Meka is quantitative and computer-based. Meka
allocates exposure to each market based on the relationships among the different
markets and among the trading systems. Exposure in many markets can be short or
long, depending on various market conditions: the trading systems are
predominantly trend-following in nature. Several different analytical approaches
are employed in the portfolio, including (but not limited to) approaches based
on moving averages, breakouts, option replication, and volatility. They vary
from short-term methods that trade almost every day to long-term methods that
sometimes hold positions for over a year.
STONEBROOK
MANAGER'S BACKGROUND
Stonebrook Structured Products is a New York-based financial
engineering firm founded by Dr. Jerome Abernathy in 1993. Since then, the group
has evolved into an asset management and consulting firm managing more than $380
million in a variety of investment strategies, many of them customized for
individual clients. Utilizing a team approach, Stonebrook focuses on developing
solution-based investment strategies for its clients.
Dr. Jerome Abernathy is managing partner at Stonebrook. Prior to
starting Stonebrook in 1993, Dr. Abernathy was director of research at Moore
Capital Management in New York. Prior to joining Moore, he was manager of the
analytical trading group at Merrill Lynch in New York. He began his career at
Morgan Stanley where he was a trader in the analytical
17
18
proprietary trading group. Dr. Abernathy holds a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering
and Computer Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology where he
also attended the Sloan School of Management.
VOLATILITY HEDGE PROGRAM
Stonebrook's Volatility Hedge Program (VHP) is an options-based
technical system designed to reduce the risk associated with trend-following
portfolios. VHP is employed as an overlay to protect profits against market
reversals. As trends in the global futures markets accelerate rapidly, many
traditional trend-following programs are at risk of giving back unrealized
profits. This is due in part to the fact that the distance from the stop levels
employed by the trend-following managers often trail behind the market move. By
purchasing either puts or calls depending on the direction of the trend (puts
during upward trends, calls during downward trends), VHP effectively protects
these unrealized gains at limited cost. By adjusting the parameters and
instruments traded to match those of the underlying portfolio, VHP is customized
for each client in order to provide optimum results. Performance, therefore,
will vary from client to client.
THE ADVISORY AGREEMENT
To utilize the commodity trading advice of the Advisor and Stonebrook,
the Partnership has entered into a management agreement (the "Advisory
Agreement") with the Advisor and Stonebrook. Set forth below is a brief
description of certain points of the Advisory Agreement.
INDEMNIFICATION. The Partnership has agreed to indemnify the Advisor
and Stonebrook from and against any loss, liability, claim, demand, damage, cost
or expense (including reasonable attorneys' and accountants' fees) arising out
of the Advisor's or Stonebrook's performance of its services except for certain
actions by the Advisor or Stonebrook, including but not limited to (i) a
material breach of the Advisory Agreement; (ii) an act of, or omission to act
due to, breach of fiduciary duty, bad faith, misconduct or negligence by the
Advisor, Stonebrook, or its respective principals; or (iii) a materially
misleading or untrue statement of material fact contained in the Advisor's or
Stonebrook's disclosure document or an omission to state therein a material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not
materially misleading.
The Advisor and Stonebrook shall be liable to the Partnership for, and
shall indemnify, hold harmless, and defend the Partnership from and against, any
loss, liability, claim, demand, damage, cost and expense (including reasonable
attorneys' and accountants' fees), to which the Partnership may become subject
arising out of or based upon an act, omission, conduct or activity of the
Advisor or Stonebrook arising from (i) a material breach of any term of the
Advisory Agreement; (ii) an act of, or omission to act due to, breach of
fiduciary duty, bad faith, misconduct or negligence by the Advisor or
Stonebrook; or (iii) a materially misleading or untrue statement of material
fact contained in the Advisor's or Stonebrook's disclosure document or an
omission to state therein a material fact required to be stated therein or
necessary to make the statements therein not materially misleading.
18
19
STATUS. The Advisor and Stonebrook are, and for all purposes shall be
deemed to be, independent contractors and, unless otherwise expressly provided
in the Advisory Agreement or with the prior written authorization of the
Partnership, the Advisor, Stonebrook and their respective principals shall have
no authority to act for or represent the Partnership in any way and shall not
otherwise be deemed to be an agent of the Partnership. The Advisor and
Stonebrook are neither sponsors nor promoters of the Partnership.
THE BROKER
The General Partner has responsibility for monitoring the Partnership's
brokers and for negotiation of their brokerage commission rates. The General
Partner has selected E. D. & F. Man International Inc. to be the clearing broker
for the Partnership. The Broker is registered under the CEAct, as amended, as an
FCM and a CPO, and is a member of the NFA in such capacities. In addition, the
Broker is registered with the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
as a broker-dealer. The Broker, which is part of the E. D. & F. Man Group of
companies, is a member of major United States futures and securities exchanges.
The Broker's main office is located at Two World Financial Center, 27th Floor,
New York, New York 10281-2700. The Broker's telephone number at such location is
(212) 566-9000.
At any given time, the Broker is involved in numerous legal actions and
administrative proceedings, which in the aggregate, are not, as of the date of
this registration statement, expected to have a material effect upon its
condition, financial or otherwise or to the services it will render to the
Partnership. There have been no material, administrative, civil or criminal
proceedings pending on appeal or concluded against the Broker or its principals
within five years preceding the date of this report.
The Broker acts only as clearing broker for the Partnership and as such
is paid commissions for executing and clearing trades on behalf of the
Partnership. The Broker has not passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
report. The Broker neither will act in any supervisory capacity with respect to
the General Partner nor participate in the management of the General Partner or
the Partnership. Therefore, prospective investors should not rely on the Broker
in deciding whether or not to participate in the Partnership.
CUSTOMER AGREEMENT
The Partnership and the Broker have entered into a non-exclusive
customer agreement (the "Customer Agreement") that provides that the Broker may
execute some, and clear all, transactions by or on behalf of the Partnership in
accordance with the instructions of the Advisor. The Broker is responsible for
holding and maintaining certain Partnership assets; execution of some and
clearance of all foreign currency Commodity transactions; preparation and
transmittal of daily confirmations of transactions and monthly statements of
account; calculation of equity balances and margin requirements, and similar
transaction-related administrative functions. The Customer Agreement provides
that the Partnership will post margin as required. For a description of the
brokerage commissions payable, see "Item 1. Business -- Fees and Expenses--Other
Fees and Expenses".
19
20
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
The Partnership does not own or lease any physical properties. The
Partnership's office is located within the office of the General Partner at Two
American Lane, P.O. Box 5150, Greenwich, Connecticut 06831-8150.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
The General Partner is not aware of any material pending legal
proceedings to which the Partnership or the General Partner is a party or to
which any of its or the Partnership's assets is subject.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the
fourth quarter of 2000.
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
MARKET INFORMATION
There is no established public trading market for the Units.
HOLDERS
There were approximately 466 holders of Units at March 15, 2001.
DIVIDENDS
Pursuant to the Partnership Agreement, distributions of profits, if
any, will be made at the sole discretion of the General Partner. As of March 15,
2001 the General Partner had not made, and the General Partner does not
currently intend to make, any distributions.
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
In June 1996, the Partnership commenced a private placement of Units in
reliance on the exemptions afforded by, among others, Section 4(2) of the 1933
Act and Rule 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Similar reliance has
been placed on available exemptions from securities qualification requirements
under applicable state securities laws. Units are offered monthly at a price per
Unit equal to the then-current Net Asset Value per Unit plus a selling
commission equal to 5% unless such selling commission is waived in whole or in
part. The minimum subscription is $26,250 for new investors other than benefit
plan investors (within the meaning of Department of Labor Regulation ss.ss.
2510.3-101(f)(2) ("Employee Benefit Plans") that meet the minimum investment
requirements that otherwise apply to prospective subscribers for Units, or
$10,500 for Employee Benefit Plans and existing Limited Partners, which amounts
include selling commissions of $1,250 and $500, respectively. A subscriber may
subscribe for Units in excess of the foregoing minimum amount in increments of
$1000. As of the date
20
21
hereof, Units are continuing to be offered, and there is no maximum number of
Units that may be purchased or sold.
During the fourth quarter of 2000, 40.1342 Units were sold for a total
of $44,140.
ITEM 6. FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following Selected Financial Data is derived from the audited
financial statements of the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999, 1998 and 1997 and for the period June 18, 1996 (inception) to December 31,
1996. The Partnership commenced trading operations on October 9, 1996. See
"Index to Financial Statements" at page F-1.
YEAR ENDED PERIOD ENDED
---------------------------------------------------------- DECEMBER 31,
2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
-------------- ------------- ------------ ------------ ----------------
Total Assets $ 23,765,608 $ 48,842,564 $ 35,864,129 $ 13,814,909 $ 6,641,963
Total Partners' Capital 22,158,555 47,732,793 35,559,179 13,550,922 6,535,088
Total Income (7,037,125) (1,045,642) 12,380,097 4,056,330 25,541
Total Expenses 7,115,195 7,361,761 5,996,006 2,269,650 79,124
Net Income (Loss) (14,152,320) (8,407,403) 6,384,091 1,786,680 (53,673)
A Units
Net Asset Value Per A Unit $ 1,199.29 $ 1,609.53 $ 1,829.21 $ 1,283.62 $ 1,081.40
============== ============== ============ ============ ================
Net Income (Loss) Per A Unit (Based
on weighted average number of
A Units outstanding during the
period) $ (499.98) $ (196.68) $ 555.83 $ 130.21 $ (21.29)
============== ============= ============ ============ ================
Increase (Decrease) in Net
Asset Value Per A Unit $ (410.24) $ (219.68) $ 545.59 $ 202.22 $ 81.40
============== ============= ============ ============ ================
B Units
Net Asset Value Per B Units $ 1,145.25 $ 1,534.23 $ 1,760.76 $ 1,253.94
=============== ============== ============= =============
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit (Based
on weighted average number
of B Units outstanding during
the period) $ (485.55) $ (370.99) $ 307.36 $ 285.90
=============== ============== ============= =============
Increase (Decrease) in Net Asset
Value Per B Unit $ (388.98) $ (226.53) $ 506.82 $ 198.02
=============== ============== ============= =============
21
22
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The discussion below and elsewhere in this Form 10-K contains "forward
looking" information that are based on the beliefs of the Partnership, as well
as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, the Partnership.
A number of important factors could cause the Partnership's actual growth,
results, performance and business prospects and opportunities in 2001 and beyond
to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, any such forward
looking information.
The assets of the Partnership are used to engage, directly or
indirectly, in the speculative trading of Investments. From time to time, a
portion of such proceeds may be used for transactions in the cash markets or for
interbank trading.
The assets of the Partnership are deposited with the Broker in a
trading account established by the Partnership for the Advisor and are used by
the Partnership as margin to engage in trading. Such assets are held in either a
non-interest bearing bank account or in securities approved by the CFTC for
investment of customer funds. In addition, certain of the Partnership's assets
may also be placed in a custodian account with a cash manager to maximize the
interest earned on assets not committed as margin.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Partnership does not have, nor does it expect to have, any capital
assets. Redemptions and sales of additional Units in the future will affect the
amount of funds available for trading Investments in subsequent periods.
There are only three factors that affect the Partnership's capital
resources: (i) the trading profits or loss generated by the Advisor (including
interest income); (ii) the money invested or redeemed by the Limited Partners;
and (iii) capital invested or redeemed by the General Partner. The General
Partner has maintained, and shall maintain, at all times a capital account in
such an amount, up to a total of $500,000, as is necessary for the General
Partner to maintain a one percent (1%) interest in the capital, income and
losses of the Partnership. All capital contributions by the General Partner
necessary to maintain such capital account balance shall be evidenced by Units
of general partnership interest, each of which shall have an initial value equal
to the Net Asset Value per Unit at the time of such contribution. The General
Partner, in its sole discretion, may withdraw any excess above its required
capital contribution without notice to the Limited Partners. The General
Partner, in its sole discretion, may also contribute any greater amount to the
Partnership, for which it shall receive, at its option, additional Units of
general partnership interest at their then-current Net Asset Value.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The success of the Partnership is dependent upon the ability of the
Advisor to generate trading profits through the speculative trading of
Investments sufficient to produce capital appreciation after payment of all fees
and expenses. Future results will depend in large part upon the Investment
markets in general, the performance of the Advisor, the amount of additions and
22
23
redemptions, and changes in interest rates. Due to the highly leveraged nature
of Investment trading, small price movements may result in substantial losses.
Because of the nature of these factors and their interaction, it is impossible
to predict future operating results.
The Partnership has incurred and will continue to incur substantial
charges from the payment of brokerage commissions to the Broker, management
and/or incentive fees to the Advisor, management fees, offering fees and/or
incentive fees to the General Partner and operating expenses. The Partnership is
required to make substantial trading profits to avoid depletion and exhaustion
of its assets from the above-mentioned fees and expenses.
Due to the nature of the Partnership's business, the Partnership's
trading results depend on the Advisor and the ability of its individual trading
system to take advantage of price movement or other profit opportunities in the
Investment markets. The following paragraphs present a summary of the
Partnership's operations for the years indicated. It is important to note,
however, that the Advisor trades in various markets at different times and that
prior activity in a particular market does not mean that such markets will be
actively traded by an Advisor or will be profitable in the future. Consequently,
the results of operations of the Partnership can only be discussed in the
context of the overall trading activities of the Partnership, the Advisor's
trading activities on behalf of the Partnership as a whole and how the
Partnership has performed in the past.
In 1999, Commodity Trading Advisors and the managed futures industry as
a whole experienced their worst annualized performance since 1994.
Trend-following CTAs, such as Dennis Trading Group (DTG), the former trading
advisor for The Fulcrum Fund Limited Partnership, had a particularly difficult
time owing to a marked lack of trends in all but a few markets. In November
2000, DTG resigned as the Advisor and was replaced by the Meka program of the
Beacon Management Corporation ("Beacon"). That replacement coincided with a
shift in the market environment as trends began to emerge throughout the global
marketplace. In fact, for many commodities trading advisors, the fourth quarter
of 2000 proved to be a very favorable period, as these trends were of sufficient
magnitude and duration to lift many trading advisors into positive territory for
the year. For the industry as a whole it was one of the strongest performance
periods in recent memory.
In general, CTAs analyze the movement of prices in the commodity and
financial futures markets to identify trends and the opportunities for profit
which accompany them. Because a CTA can take long or short positions in the
futures markets, the direction of a trend is less important than the existence
of a trend itself. The Beacon Management Corporation or another CTA has the
potential to generate profits when prices are identified as trending downward,
by going short or selling ahead of a price decline, and when prices appear to be
trending upward, by going long or buying ahead of the rise in price. When prices
are moving sideways (i.e., with little movement up or down) or are exhibiting
significant short-term volatility (such as rapid intra-day or inter-day price
swings) trends are few and far between, and CTA profits can be flat or negative.
Some CTAs monitor long-term trends, some intermediate term, a few
short-term. Beacon's trading strategy concentrates largely on long-term trends.
The globally diversified portfolio is usually invested in all markets at all
times, in varying degrees depending on current
23
24
market volatility and price trends. DTG, the Partnership's former trading
advisor, followed a strategy similar to Beacon's. The Partnership has hired
Stonebrook's Volatility Hedge Program to mitigate risk during periods of market
volatility. During 2000 and 1999, DTG's trading policy was to increase leverage
in its positions at the end of a profitable day and to decrease leverage at the
end of a losing day. During 1999, there were very few consecutive profitable
days. This meant that in most instances where leverage was increased at the end
of a profitable day it was followed by a losing day thus increasing the loss.
Conversely, since there were very few consecutive profitable days, on most
profitable days DTG had committed the lowest leverage thus decreasing the profit
for that day. The Company also believes that this had an adverse effect on its
1999 results compared to 1998.
Set forth below is a summary of the results of operations of the
Partnership for the calendar years 1998 through 2000.
As of December 31, 2000, the Net Asset Value of the Partnership was
$22,158,555, a decrease of approximately 53.58% from its Net Asset Value of
$47,732,793 at December 31, 1999. The Partnership's 2000 subscriptions and
redemptions totaled $8,099,481 and $19,521,399, respectively. For the year ended
December 31, 2000, the Partnership had revenues comprised of ($14,184,423) in
realized losses, $5,159,280 in unrealized gains and $1,988,018 in interest
income. For that same year, the Partnership had expenses consisting of
$4,349,404 in brokerage commissions, $746,501 in management fees, $462,919 in
incentive fees, $1,208,141 in General Partner's offering fees and $348,230 in
operating expenses. This resulted in the Partnership having a net loss of
($14,152,320). The Net Asset Value per A Unit at December 31, 2000 decreased
25.49% from $1,609.53 at December 31, 1999 to $1,199.29 at December 31, 2000.
The Net Asset Value per B Unit at December 31, 2000 decreased 25.35% from
$1,534.23 at December 31, 1999 to $1,145.25 at December 31, 2000. Approximately
63% of the Partnership's net losses during the year ended December 31, 2000 were
attributable to global interest rates, 21% to metals, 14% to grains and 2% to
tropicals.
As of December 31, 1999, the Net Asset Value of the Partnership was
$47,732,793, an increase of 34.23% from its Net Asset Value of $35,559,179 at
December 31, 1998. The Partnership's 1999 subscriptions and redemptions totaled
$27,390,118 and $6,809,101, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 1999,
the Partnership had revenue comprised of ($1,459,043) in realized losses,
($1,539,030) in unrealized losses and $1,952,431 in interest income. For that
same period, the Partnership had expenses comprised of $2,676,283 in brokerage
commissions, $877,660 in management fees, $2,103,117 in incentive fees,
$1,461,667 in General Partner offering fees and $243,034 in operating expenses.
This resulted in the Partnership having a net loss of ($8,407,403) for that
period. For the year ended December 31, 1999, the Net Asset Value of Class A
Units decreased 12.01% from $1,829.21 at December 31, 1998 to $1,609.53 and the
Net Asset Value of Class B Units decreased 12.87% from $1,760.76 to $1,534.23.
Approximately 58% of the Partnership's net losses during the year ended December
31, 1999 were attributable to global interest rates, 7% to U.S. stock indices,
11% to metals, 23% to tropicals, and 1% to meats.
As of December 31, 1998, the Net Asset Value of the Partnership was
$35,559,179, an increase of approximately 162.41% from its Net Asset Value of
$13,550,922 at December 31, 1997. The Partnership's 1998 subscriptions and
redemptions totaled $18,134,670 and
24
25
$2,510,504, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 1998, the Partnership
had revenue comprised of $10,374,018 in realized gains, $943,011 in unrealized
gains and $1,063,068 in interest income. For that same period, the Partnership
had expenses comprised of $1,400,182 in brokerage commissions, $482,628 in
management fees, $3,229,070 in incentive fees, $748,537 in General Partner
offering fees and $135,589 in operating expenses. This resulted in the
Partnership having a net gain of $6,384,091 for that period. For the year ended
December 31, 1998, the Net Asset Value of Class A Units increased 42.5% from
$1,283.62 to $1,829.21 and the Net Asset Value of Class B Units increased 40.42%
from $1,253.94 to $1,760.76. Approximately 76% of the Partnership's net gains
during 1998 were attributable to global interest rates, 15% to European and U.S.
stock indices, 6% to grains and 3% to meats.
For the reasons described in this section, past performance is not
indicative of future results. As a result, any recent increases in net realized
or unrealized trading gains may have no bearing on any results that may be
obtained in the future.
To enhance the foregoing comparison of results of operations from year
to year, prospective investors can examine the Statements of Financial Condition
and the Statements of Operations for the periods described above.
LIQUIDITY
Although there is no public market for the Units, a Limited Partner may
redeem his Units in the Partnership as of any month-end upon ten days' written
notice to the General Partner in the form of a request for redemption.
With respect to the Partnership's trading, in general, the Advisor will
trade only Investments that have sufficient liquidity to enable it to enter and
close out positions without causing major price movements. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, most United States commodity exchanges limit the amount by which
certain commodities may move during a single day by regulations referred to as
"daily price fluctuation limits", or "daily limits". Pursuant to such
regulations, no trades may be executed on any given day at prices beyond daily
limits. The price of a futures contract has occasionally moved the daily limit
for several consecutive days, with little or no trading, thereby effectively
preventing a party from liquidating its position. While the occurrence of such
an event may reduce or effectively eliminate the liquidity of a particular
market, it will not limit ultimate losses and may in fact substantially increase
losses because of this inability to liquidate unfavorable positions. In
addition, if there is little or no trading in a particular futures or forward
contract that the Partnership is trading, whether such illiquidity is caused by
any of the above reasons or otherwise, the Partnership may be unable to execute
trades at favorable prices and/or may be unable or unwilling to liquidate its
position prior to its expiration date, thereby requiring the Partnership to make
or take delivery of the Underlying Interest.
The Partnership's trading also may be impacted by the various conflicts
of interest between the Partnership and the General Partner, the Advisor, the
Broker, and their affiliates.
25
26
RISK FACTORS
PAST RESULTS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE
The Partnership is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive
instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or
substantially all of the Partnership's assets are subject to the risk of trading
loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is
integral, not incidental, to the Partnership's main line of business.
Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair market value of
the Partnership's open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash
flow. The Partnership's market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors,
including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity
price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the
diversification effects among the Partnership's open positions and the liquidity
of the markets in which it trades.
The Partnership, under the direction of the Advisor, rapidly acquires
and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different
markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future
market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership's past performance
is not necessarily indicative of its future results.
PRIMARY TRADING AND NON-TRADING RISK EXPOSURES
The Partnership's primary market risk exposures as well as the
strategies used and to be used by the General Partner and the Advisor for
managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and
risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Partnership's risk
controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government
interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of
dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price
relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation,
general economic conditions and many other factors could result in material
losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk
management strategies of the Partnership. There can be no assurance that the
Partnership's current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not
change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the
short- or long-term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all
of their investment in the Partnership.
26
27
MEANS OF MANAGING RISK EXPOSURE
The means by which the Partnership and the Advisor attempt to manage
the risk of the Partnership's open positions is essentially the same in all
market categories traded. The Advisor applies its own risk management policies
to its trading. These policies generally limit the total exposure that may be
taken per "risk unit" of assets under management. The Advisor also follows
diversification guidelines (often formulated in terms of the maximum margin
which they will commit to positions in any one contract or group of related
contracts), as well as imposing "stop-loss" points at which open positions must
be closed out. In addition, the Partnership uses Stonebrook's Volatility Hedge
Program to hedge the positions of the Advisor in certain circumstances.
Occasionally, the Advisor will limit the market exposure of its Partnership
account through acquiring put or call options which "collar" the risk of open
positions. However, because of the typically high degree of liquidity in the
markets traded by the Partnership and the expense of acquiring options, the
Advisor mostly relies on stop-loss policies, requiring the liquidation of
positions once losses of a certain magnitude have been incurred.
The General Partner controls the risk of the Partnership's non-trading
instruments (interest-bearing securities held for cash management purposes) -
the only Partnership investments, as opposed to Advisor selections, directed by
the General Partner-generally limiting the duration of such instruments to no
more than 3 years.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The Partnership's financial statements, together with the auditor's
report thereon, are included on pages F-1 through F-10 hereof.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The General Partner, Kenmar Advisory Corp., is the sole general partner
of the Partnership. The General Partner, is a corporation which was originally
organized as a New York corporation in September 1983 and reorganized as a
Connecticut corporation on January 1, 1996. The General Partner has been
registered with the CFTC as a CPO and a member in good standing of the NFA in
such capacity since February 1984. Its address is Two American Lane, P.O. Box
5150, Greenwich, Connecticut 06831-8150 and its telephone number is (203)
861-1000. It is owned equally and indirectly by Messrs. Shewer and Goodman. The
directors and executive officers of the General Partner currently are as
follows:
MR. KENNETH A. SHEWER, age 47, has been the Chairman and a director of
the General Partner since September 1983. Mr. Shewer was employed by Pasternak,
Baum and Co., Inc. ("Pasternak, Baum"), an international cash commodity firm,
from June 1976 until
27
28
September 1983. Mr. Shewer left Pasternak, Baum in September 1983 to form Kenmar
Advisory Corp. with Mr. Goodman. Mr. Shewer created and managed Pasternak,
Baum's Grain Logistics and Administration Department and created its Domestic
Corn and Soybean Trading Department. In 1982, Mr. Shewer became co-manager of
Pasternak, Baum's F.O.B. Corn Department. In 1983, Mr. Shewer was made Vice
President and Director of Pasternak, Baum. Mr. Shewer graduated from Syracuse
University with a B.S. degree in 1975.
MR. MARC S. GOODMAN, age 52, has been the President and a director of
the General Partner since September 1983. Mr. Goodman joined Pasternak, Baum in
September 1974 and was a Vice President and Director from July 1981 until
September 1983. Mr. Goodman left Pasternak, Baum in September 1983 to form
Kenmar Advisory Corp. with Mr. Shewer. While at Pasternak, Baum, Mr. Goodman was
largely responsible for business development outside of the United States, for
investment of its corporate retirement funds and for selecting trading
personnel. Mr. Goodman has conducted extensive business in South America, Europe
and the Far East. Mr. Goodman was awarded an Economics and Finance Department
Fellowship from September 1969 through June 1971. Mr. Goodman graduated from the
Bernard M. Baruch School of Business of the City University of New York with a
B.B.A. in 1969 and an M.B.A. in 1971 in Finance and Investments.
MS. ESTHER ECKERLING GOODMAN, age 48, has been the Senior Executive
Vice President of the General Partner since March 1991 and has also served as
Chief Operating Officer of the General Partner since October 1995. Ms. Goodman
joined Kenmar in July 1986 and has been involved in the futures industry since
1974. From 1974 through 1976, she was employed by Conti-Commodity Services, Inc.
and ACLI Commodity Services, Inc., in the areas of hedging, speculative trading
and tax arbitrage. In 1976, Ms. Goodman joined Loeb Rhoades and Company, Inc.,
where she was responsible for the development and management of a managed
futures program which, in 1979, became the trading system for an independent CTA
of which Ms. Goodman was a founder and principal. From 1983 through mid-1986,
Ms. Goodman was employed as a marketing executive at Commodities Corp. (USA) of
Princeton, New Jersey. Ms. Goodman was a Director of the Managed Futures
Association and its predecessor, the Managed Futures Trade Association, from
1987 through 1995. In addition, she has written several articles and has spoken
before various professional groups and organizations on the subject of managed
futures. Ms. Goodman attended Vassar College from 1970-1972 and graduated from
Stanford University in 1974 with a B.A. degree. Ms. Goodman is married to Mr.
Marc S. Goodman.
Each director of the General Partner serves until the next annual
meeting of stockholders or until a successor is elected. Executive officers of
the General Partner are appointed annually and serve at the discretion of its
Board of Directors. Messrs. Shewer and Goodman hold directorships in various
affiliates of the General Partner.
SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES OF THE GENERAL PARTNER
MR. THOMAS J. DIVUOLO, age 41, Senior Vice President responsible for
account administration, oversight and risk management, joined the General
Partner in March 1989. From 1982 through 1984, Mr. DiVuolo was employed by
Balfour Maclaine International Ltd. working in the commodity accounting and
compliance areas. From 1984 through 1986 he was employed
28
29
at E.F. Hutton and Company, Inc. as a manager of commodity regulatory reporting.
From 1986 until he joined the General Partner in 1989, Mr. DiVuolo worked for
Lloyds International Trading, a commodity trading division of Lloyds Bank. Mr.
DiVuolo is a 1982 graduate of Pace University with a B.B.A. degree in Public
Accounting. He received his M.B.A. in Finance from Wagner College in 1990.
MR. GARY J. YANNAZZO, age 48, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, joined the General Partner in August 1997. From March 1992 to July
1995, he was Senior Vice President and Controller of Mettallgesellschaft Corp.,
a diversified commodity marketing and trading company, with 30 worldwide
subsidiaries and $5 billion in annual revenues. From January 1990 through
February 1992, Mr. Yannazzo was President, Chief Executive Officer and part
owner of Holland Mortgage Corporation. From December 1982 through November 1989,
Mr. Yannazzo was First Vice President of Security Capital Corporation, a
publicly traded financial services company and affiliate of Smith Barney, Inc.
From June 1975 through November 1982, Mr. Yannazzo was with Arthur Andersen &
Co., serving as an Audit Manager from June 1980. From August 1995 until he
joined the General Partner, Mr. Yannazzo was a private consultant, engaged
primarily in projects and ventures in the commodity and derivative areas. Mr.
Yannazzo received his B.S. in business administration from Seton Hall University
in 1975 and his certified public accountant certification in 1977.
MS. JOANNE D. ROSENTHAL, age 35, Senior Vice President and Director of
Research, joined the General Partner in October 1999. Prior to joining the
General Partner, Ms. Rosenthal spent 9 years at The Chase Manhattan Bank, in
various positions of increasing responsibility. From July 1991 through April
1994, she managed the Trade Execution Desk and from May 1994 through September
1999, she was a Vice President and Senior Portfolio Manager of Chase Alternative
Asset Management, Inc. Ms. Rosenthal received a Masters of Business
Administration in Finance from Cornell University and a Bachelor of Arts in
Economics from Concordia University in Montreal, Canada.
MR. MARK M. ROSSOW, age 48, Senior Vice President and General Counsel,
joined the General Partner in August 2000. From October 1998 until July 2000,
Mr. Rossow was a partner in the law firm of Snow Becker Krauss P.C. From May
1994 until September 1998, Mr. Rossow was a partner in the law firm of Amon &
Sabatini. Prior to that, Mr. Rossow was in-house counsel to the international
accounting firm BDO Seidman. Mr. Rossow has served on the staff of the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr. Rossow earned a B.A. degree from
Syracuse University in 1975 and a J.D. degree from the University of Michigan in
1978. He was admitted to practice law in 1979.
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
requires the General Partner and the directors of the General Partner to file
reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Such persons also are required to furnish the Partnership with
copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on its review of
copies of such forms received by it, the Partnership notes that during 2000,
Messrs. Shewer and Goodman and the General Partner were untimely in reporting
[5] transactions. The
29
30
Partnership believes that all other Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable
to the reporting persons were complied with by them.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The Partnership has no directors or officers. As a limited partnership,
the business of the Partnership is managed by its General Partner which is
responsible for the administration of the business affairs of the Partnership
and receives the compensation described in "Item 1. Business".
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The Partnership has no directors or officers. The Partnership delegates
all management of the Partnership's affairs to the General Partner. As of
December 31, 2000, the General Partner owned 204.7556 Units of general
partnership interest, representing a 1.06% investment in the Partnership. The
General Partner is indirectly and equally owned by Messrs. Kenneth A. Shewer and
Marc S. Goodman.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
The General Partner is the sole general partner of the Partnership and
manages and conducts the business of the Partnership. The Partnership Agreement
provides that the General Partner may be compensated in such form(s) and in such
amount as the General Partner, in its sole discretion, shall determine, after
giving due weight to industry standards. As more fully described in Item 1
hereto, to compensate the General Partner for its management and operations of
the Partnership, its management and monitoring of the portfolio of the Advisor,
the General Partner currently receives 22.5% of the Advisor's management and
incentive fee, all of Stonebrook's incentive fee, and an offering fee. For the
year ended December 31, 2000, the General Partner received $369,383 in
management fees, $0 in incentive fees and $1,208,141 in offering fees. See "Item
1. Business - Fees and Expenses - Fees to the Advisor." In addition, because the
General Partner negotiated a brokerage commission rate for the Partnership which
is generally lower than the rate available to the public, the General Partner
may receive from the Broker a portion of the brokerage commissions paid by the
Partnership to the Broker. See "Item 1. Business--Fees and Expenses--Fees to the
General Partner".
30
31
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 10-K
(a) The following financial statements of the Partnership, with the
independent auditor's report, are filed as part of this Form 10-K:
(1) The following documents are filed as part of this
Form 10-K;
Independent Auditor's Report
Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2000 and 1999
Schedule of Securities as of December 31, 2000
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999
and 1998
Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital (Net Asset Value)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
Notes to Financial Statements
(2) All Financial Schedules are omitted because such
schedules are not required or the information
required has been presented in the aforementioned
financial statements:
(3) The following exhibits are filed with this report and
incorporated by reference by reference as set forth
below:
Exhibit No. Description
3.1 Amended Certificate of Limited Partnership for The Fulcrum
Fund Limited Partnership.
3.2 Limited Partnership Agreement of The Fulcrum Fund Limited
Partnership, dated June 18, 1996 as amended December 15, 1997
and further amended October 10, 2000.
10.1 Customer Agreement between the Partnership and E.D. & F. Man
International Inc., dated August 27, 1996 incorporated herein
by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form 10 dated June 22, 1999.
10.2 Cover Letter and Model Sub-Advisory Agreement between The
Fulcrum Fund Limited Partnership and Beacon Management
Corporation dated January 1, 1998.
10.3 Cover Letter and Model Sub-Advisory Agreement between The
Dennis Fund Limited Partnership and Stonebrook Structured
Products, LLC dated January 1, 1998.
31
32
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
---------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
---------
PAGES
-----
Independent Auditor's Report F-1
Financial Statements
Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2000 and 1999 F-2
Schedule of Securities
December 31, 2000 F-3
Statements of Operations For the Years
Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 F-4
Statements of Changes in Partners' Capital (Net Asset Value)
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 F-5
Notes to Financial Statements F-6 - 10
33
[ARTHUR F. BELL, JR. & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. LETTERHEAD]
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT
To the Partners
The Fulcrum Fund Limited Partnership
We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of The
Fulcrum Fund Limited Partnership as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, including the
December 31, 2000 schedule of securities, and the related statements of
operations and changes in partners' capital (net asset value) for the years
ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnership's management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included
confirmation of securities owned as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, by
correspondence with brokers. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of The Fulcrum Fund Limited
Partnership as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations
and the changes in its net asset values for the years ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Arthur F. Bell, Jr. & Associates, L.L.C.
Hunt Valley, Maryland
February 6, 2001
34
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
December 31, 2000 and 1999
---------
2000 1999
----------- -----------
ASSETS
Equity in broker trading accounts
Cash $14,619,061 $ 4,415,465
Unrealized gain on open contracts 4,921,853 0
----------- -----------
Deposits with broker 19,540,914 4,415,465
Cash and cash equivalents 462,653 30,682,976
Fixed income securities (cost, including
accrued interest, - $3,652,487 and $13,774,520) 3,731,704 13,616,310
Subscriptions receivable 30,337 127,813
----------- -----------
Total assets $23,765,608 $48,842,564
=========== ===========
LIABILITIES
Accounts payable $ 57,310 $ 72,870
Commissions and other trading fees
on open contracts 35,355 0
General Partner offering fee 102,107 136,856
Advisor management fees 107,359 71,329
Advisor incentive fees 462,919 0
Redemptions payable 842,003 828,716
----------- -----------
Total liabilities 1,607,053 1,109,771
----------- -----------
PARTNERS' CAPITAL (NET ASSET VALUE)
General Partner:
A Units - 0.0000 and 107.1387 units outstanding
at December 31, 2000 and 1999 0 172,443
B Units - 204.7556 and 217.7298 units outstanding
at December 31, 2000 and 1999 234,496 334,048
Limited Partners:
A Units - 2,904.2257 and 6,263.5875 units
outstanding at December 31, 2000 and 1999 3,483,015 10,081,458
B Units - 16,102.2054 and 24,210.7330 units
outstanding at December 31, 2000 and 1999 18,441,044 37,144,844
----------- -----------
Total partners' capital
(Net Asset Value) 22,158,555 47,732,793
----------- -----------
$23,765,608 $48,842,564
=========== ===========
See accompanying notes.
F-2
35
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
SCHEDULE OF SECURITIES
December 31, 2000
---------
FIXED INCOME SECURITIES 16.8% *
Face Value Description Value
---------- ----------- -----
U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS 9.7% *
900,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 5.875%, 11/30/01 $ 907,078
1,200,000 U.S. Treasury Notes, 5.75%, 8/15/03 1,243,439
----------
TOTAL U.S. GOVERNMENT OBLIGATIONS
(COST, INCLUDING ACCRUED INTEREST, - $2,115,577) 2,150,517
----------
FEDERAL AGENCY OBLIGATIONS 7.1% *
1,500,000 Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation,
Agency Bond, 7.00%, 2/15/03
(COST, INCLUDING ACCRUED INTEREST, - $1,536,910) 1,581,187
----------
TOTAL FIXED INCOME SECURITIES
(COST, INCLUDING ACCRUED INTEREST, - $3,652,487) $3,731,704
==========
* Percent of December 31, 2000 Net Asset Value is shown for each category.
See accompanying notes.
F-3
36
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
---------
2000 1999 1998
------------ ------------ ------------
INCOME
Commodity trading gains (losses)
Realized $(14,054,348) $ (1,225,471) $ 10,291,095
Change in unrealized 4,921,853 (1,383,936) 955,139
------------ ------------ ------------
Gain (loss) from commodity trading (9,132,495) (2,609,407) 11,246,234
------------ ------------ ------------
Fixed income securities gains (losses)
Realized (130,075) (233,572) 82,923
Change in unrealized 237,427 (155,094) (12,128)
------------ ------------ ------------
Gain (loss) from fixed income securities 107,352 (388,666) 70,795
------------ ------------ ------------
Interest income 1,988,018 1,952,431 1,063,068
------------ ------------ ------------
Total income (loss) (7,037,125) (1,045,642) 12,380,097
------------ ------------ ------------
EXPENSES
Brokerage commissions 4,349,404 2,676,283 1,400,182
General Partner offering fee 1,208,141 1,461,667 748,537
Advisor management fees 746,501 877,660 482,628
Advisor incentive fees 462,919 2,103,117 3,229,070
Operating expenses 348,230 243,034 135,589
------------ ------------ ------------
Total expenses 7,115,195 7,361,761 5,996,006
------------ ------------ ------------
NET INCOME (LOSS) $(14,152,320) $ (8,407,403) $ 6,384,091
============ ============ ============
A UNITS
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER A UNIT
(based on weighted average number of
A Units outstanding during the period) $ (499.98) $ (196.68) $ 555.83
============ ============ ============
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET
ASSET VALUE PER A UNIT $ (410.24) $ (219.68) $ 545.59
============ ============ ============
B UNITS
NET INCOME (LOSS) PER B UNIT
(based on weighted average number of
B Units outstanding during the period) $ (485.55) $ (370.99) $ 307.36
============ ============ ============
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET
ASSET VALUE PER B UNIT $ (388.98) $ (226.53) $ 506.82
============ ============ ============
See accompanying notes.
F-4
37
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS' CAPITAL (NET ASSET
VALUE) For the Years Ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
---------
Partners' Capital
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A Units B Units
--------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------
General Limited General Limited
Units Partner Partners Units Partner Partners Total
---------- --------- ----------- ------------ -------- ------------ ------------
Balances at
December 31, 1997 7,644.5427 $ 137,525 $ 9,675,138 2,981.2126 $ 40,515 $ 3,697,744 $ 13,550,922
Net income for the year
ended December 31, 1998 58,454 4,010,069 23,646 2,291,922 6,384,091
Additions 0.0000 0 0 10,729.4750 168,000 17,966,670 18,134,670
Redemptions (614.2132) 0 (1,021,268) (818.9144) 0 (1,489,236) (2,510,504)
----------- --------- ----------- ------------ -------- ------------ ------------
Balances at
December 31, 1998 7,030.3295 195,979 12,663,939 12,891.7732 232,161 22,467,100 35,559,179
Net (loss) for the year
ended December 31, 1999 (23,536) (1,304,782) (42,113) (7,036,972) (8,407,403)
Additions 0.0000 0 0 14,691.3469 144,000 27,246,118 27,390,118
Redemptions (659.6033) 0 (1,277,699) (3,154.6573) 0 (5,531,402) (6,809,101)
----------- --------- ----------- ------------ -------- ------------ ------------
Balances at
December 31, 1999 6,370.7262 172,443 10,081,458 24,428.4628 334,048 37,144,844 47,732,793
Net (loss) for the year
ended December 31, 2000 (57,231) (2,520,700) (97,373) (11,477,016) (14,152,320)
Additions 0.0000 0 0 5,369.2816 75,000 8,024,481 8,099,481
Redemptions (3,466.5005) (115,212) (4,077,743) (13,490.7834) (77,179) (15,251,265) (19,521,399)
----------- --------- ----------- ------------ -------- ------------ ------------
Balances at
December 31, 2000 2,904.2257 $ 0 $ 3,483,015 16,306.9610 $234,496 $ 18,441,044 $ 22,158,555
=========== ========= =========== ============ ======== ============ ============
A Units B Units
------------------------------------ ---------------------------------
Net Asset Value Per Unit Net Asset Value Per Unit
------------------------------------ ---------------------------------
December 31, December 31,
2000 1999 1998 2000 1999 1998
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
$ 1,199.29 $1,609.53 $1,829.21 $1,145.25 $1,534.23 $1,760.76
============ ========= ========= ========= ========= =========
See accompanying notes.
F-5
38
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
---------
Note 1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
A. General Description of the Partnership
The Fulcrum Fund Limited Partnership (the Partnership) is a
Connecticut limited partnership which operates as a commodity
pool. The Partnership engages in the speculative trading of
futures contracts and options on futures contracts. It is
subject to the regulations of the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, an agency of the United States (U.S.) government
which regulates most aspects of the commodity futures
industry; rules of the National Futures Association, an
industry self-regulatory organization; and the requirements of
commodity exchanges and Futures Commission Merchants (brokers)
through which the Partnership trades.
During 1999, the Partnership became subject to the
informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. Accordingly, the Partnership is subject to the
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Investments made prior to April 30, 1997 are referred to as "A
Units" and investments made on or after April 30, 1997 are
referred to as "B Units." The initial net asset value per B
Unit was the net asset value per A Unit at April 30, 1997. The
only difference between A Units and B Units are the advisor
management and incentive fee rates in effect prior to November
1, 2000, as further described in Note 3.
On October 10, 2000, the name of the Partnership was changed
from The Dennis Fund Limited Partnership to The Fulcrum Fund
Limited Partnership.
B. Method of Reporting
The Partnership's financial statements are presented in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,
which require the use of certain estimates made by the
Partnership's management.
C. Commodities
Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated.
Net unrealized gains or losses on open contracts (the
difference between contract purchase price and quoted market
price) are reflected in the statement of financial condition.
Any change in net unrealized gain or loss from the preceding
period is reported in the statement of operations. Brokerage
commissions include other trading fees and are charged to
expense when contracts are opened.
F-6
39
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
---------
Note 1. ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(CONTINUED)
D. Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash and all highly liquid
investments, including money market mutual funds and other
investments with a maturity of three months or less from the
date of purchase.
E. Fixed Income Securities
Fixed income securities are reported at market value plus
accrued interest. Fixed income securities transactions are
accounted for on the trade date. Any change in net unrealized
gain or loss from the preceding period is reported in the
statement of operations. Interest income is recorded on the
accrual basis.
F. Income Taxes
The Partnership prepares calendar year U.S. and state
information tax returns and reports to the partners their
allocable shares of the Partnership's income, expenses and
trading gains or losses.
G. Foreign Currency Transactions
The Partnership's functional currency is the U.S. dollar;
however, it transacts business in currencies other than the
U.S. dollar. Assets and liabilities denominated in currencies
other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at
the rates in effect at the date of the statement of financial
condition. Income and expense items denominated in currencies
other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars at
the rates in effect during the period. Gains and losses
resulting from the translation to U.S. dollars are reported in
income currently.
Note 2. GENERAL PARTNER
The General Partner of the Partnership is Kenmar Advisory Corp.,
which conducts and manages the business of the Partnership. The
Limited Partnership Agreement requires the General Partner to
maintain a capital account of no less than the lesser of 1% of the
aggregate capital accounts of all partners or $500,000.
F-7
40
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
---------
Note 2. GENERAL PARTNER (CONTINUED)
Effective February 1, 1998, for managing the continuing offering of
units, the General Partner receives a monthly offering fee equal to
0.25% (3% annually) of that month's beginning Net Asset Value (as
defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement) of the Partnership.
Prior to February 1, 1998, the General Partner received a monthly
offering fee equal to .25% (3% annually) of the prior month's
beginning Net Asset Value (as defined) of the Partnership. Commencing
April 1998, the General Partner rebates to One Million Dollar
Investors (as defined in the Confidential Private Placement
Memorandum and Disclosure Document) who invested in the Partnership
prior to August 1, 2000, a monthly amount equal to two-thirds of the
offering fee applicable to such One Million Dollar Investors. All
rebates to One Million Dollar Investors are made by issuing
additional B Units.
A portion of the brokerage commissions paid by the Partnership to the
broker is, in turn, paid by the broker to the General Partner.
Note 3. COMMODITY TRADING ADVISORS
Effective November 1, 2000, the Partnership has advisory agreements
with Beacon Management Corporation (USA) (Beacon) and Stonebrook
Structured Products, LLC (Stonebrook) (the "commodity trading
advisors"). Pursuant to the advisory agreement with Beacon, the
Partnership pays a monthly management fee of 1/12 of 2% (2% annually)
of the month-end Net Asset Value of the subaccount (as defined in the
advisory agreement) and a quarterly incentive fee equal to 20% of Net
New Trading Profits (as defined). Beacon pays up to 22.5% of its
management and incentive fees to the General Partner. Pursuant to the
advisory agreement with Stonebrook, the Partnership pays a monthly
management fee equal to 1/12 of 1% (1% annually) of the month-end Net
Asset Value of the subaccount (as defined) and a quarterly incentive
fee equal to 10% of Net New Trading Profits (as defined). Stonebrook
pays the entire incentive fee to the General Partner. During the
period November 1, 2000 to December 31, 2000, the General Partner
waived its right to all incentive fees to which it was entitled from
Beacon and Stonebrook; accordingly, such incentive fees were not
charged to the Partnership and the advisor incentive fees reported in
the statement of operations have been reduced by the amount of such
incentive fees waived by the General Partner.
F-8
41
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 3. COMMODITY TRADING ADVISORS (CONTINUED)
Prior to November 1, 2000, the Partnership had an advisory agreement
with Dennis Trading Group, Inc. (Dennis), a commodity trading
advisor, pursuant to which the A Units paid a monthly management fee
of 1/6 of 1% (2% annually) of the month-end Net Asset Value of the
subaccount (as defined in the advisory agreement) and a quarterly
incentive fee equal to 25% of the Net New Trading Profits (as
defined). The commodity trading advisor and General Partner each
received one-half of the management and incentive fees applicable to
A Units. Pursuant to the advisory agreement, the B Units paid a
monthly management fee of 1/12 of 1.75% (1.75% annually) of the
month-end Net Asset Value of the subaccount (as defined) and a
quarterly incentive fee equal to 27.5% of the Net New Trading Profits
(as defined). Dennis received 3/7 of the management fee and 7/11 of
the incentive fee applicable to B Units and the General Partner
received 4/7 of the management fee and 4/11 of the incentive fee
applicable to B Units.
Note 4. DEPOSITS WITH BROKER
The Partnership deposits cash with ED & F Man Inc. to act as broker
subject to Commodity Futures Trading Commission regulations and
various exchange and broker requirements. Margin requirements are
satisfied by the deposit of cash with such broker. The Partnership
earns interest income on its cash deposited with the broker.
Note 5. SUBSCRIPTIONS, DISTRIBUTIONS AND REDEMPTIONS
Investments in the Partnership are made by subscription agreement,
subject to acceptance by the General Partner. The subscription price
is equal to the Net Asset Value of the units purchased plus a 5%
selling commission, unless such selling commission is waived in whole
or in part by the General Partner. Additions to partners' capital are
shown net of such selling commissions which amounted to $100,493,
$280,563 and $198,839 in 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.
The Partnership is not required to make distributions, but may do so
at the sole discretion of the General Partner. A Limited Partner may
request and receive redemption of units owned, subject to
restrictions in the Limited Partnership Agreement.
Note 6. TRADING ACTIVITIES AND RELATED RISKS
The Partnership engages in the speculative trading of U.S. and
foreign futures contracts and options on U.S. and foreign futures
contracts (collectively, "derivatives"). The Partnership is exposed
to both market risk, the risk arising from changes in the market
value of the contracts, and credit risk, the risk of failure by
another party to perform according to the terms of a contract.
F-9
42
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
Note 6. TRADING ACTIVITIES AND RELATED RISKS (CONTINUED)
Purchase and sale of futures and options on futures contracts
requires margin deposits with the broker. Additional deposits may be
necessary for any loss on contract value. The Commodity Exchange Act
requires a broker to segregate all customer transactions and assets
from such broker's proprietary activities. A customer's cash and
other property (for example, U.S. Treasury bills) deposited with a
broker are considered commingled with all other customer funds
subject to the broker's segregation requirements. In the event of a
broker's insolvency, recovery may be limited to a pro rata share of
segregated funds available. It is possible that the recovered amount
could be less than total cash and other property deposited.
The Partnership has a substantial portion of its assets on deposit
with brokers and dealers in securities and other financial
institutions in connection with its cash management activities. In
the event of a financial institution's insolvency, recovery of
Partnership assets on deposit may be limited to account insurance or
other protection afforded such deposits.
For derivatives, risks arise from changes in the market value of the
contracts. Theoretically, the Partnership is exposed to a market risk
equal to the value of futures contracts purchased and unlimited
liability on such contracts sold short. As both a buyer and seller of
options, the Partnership pays or receives a premium at the outset and
then bears the risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the
contract underlying the option. Written options expose the
Partnership to potentially unlimited liability, and purchased options
expose the Partnership to a risk of loss limited to the premiums
paid.
The General Partner has established procedures to actively monitor
market risk and minimize credit risk. The Limited Partners bear the
risk of loss only to the extent of the market value of their
respective investments and, in certain specific circumstances,
distributions and redemptions received.
Note 7. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On January 1, 2001, A Units and B Units were converted into a single
Unit utilizing the Net Asset Value per B Unit on December 31, 2000 of
$1,145.25. Accordingly, after the conversion of Units on January 1,
2001, the total number of outstanding units as of January 1, 2001 was
19,348.2327.
F-10
43
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the
30th day of March, 2001.
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
By: Kenmar Advisory Corp., general partner
By: /s/ Kenneth A. Shewer
---------------------------------------
Kenneth A. Shewer
Chairman
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 30th day of March, 2001.
THE FULCRUM FUND LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
By: Kenmar Advisory Corp., general partner
By: /s/ Kenneth A. Shewer
---------------------------------------
Kenneth A. Shewer
Chairman and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
By: /s/ Marc S. Goodman
---------------------------------------
Marc S. Goodman
President and Director
By: /s/ Thomas J. Divuolo
---------------------------------------
Thomas J. DiVuolo
Senior Vice President
(Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer for the Partnership)