related fees during the three months ended March 31, 2005 of $36,732,019. Losses were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity contracts in currencies, livestock, metals, indices, grains and non-U.S. interest rates and were partially offset by gains in energy, U.S. interest rates and softs. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees during the three months ended March 31, 2004 of $49,962,283. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity contracts in energy, grains, livestock, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates and metals and were partially offset by losses in currencies, softs and indices.

Results for the first quarter were highlighted by uneven trading performance in volatile energy and financial markets and resulted in effectively giving back much of the gains from the fourth quarter 2004.

Trends that had emerged in late December continued to effect performance in January. Energy price increases, particularly in crude oil and natural gas that had produced profits through much of the last third of 2004, initially weakened against advisors' positions, then later regained strength and ended being the most profitable sector for the quarter.

Alternatively, the U.S. dollar, which likewise had generated profits consistently in 2004, began to reverse its long-term decline and moved back to the low 130s in relation to the Euro. This move was particularly disruptive in January and continued as the markets produced no identifiable direction through much of the quarter. Trading in the Euro, British pound and Swiss franc chopped advisors' positions in both directions resulting in the greatest losses for the quarter. Trading in interest rate contracts was mixed while stock indices showed some strength in February but not sufficient to offset losses in January and March. Metals and agricultural trading followed U.S. dollar patterns with the net effect being flat for the quarter.

Commodity futures markets are highly volatile. The potential for broad and rapid price fluctuations increases the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increases the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisors to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisors are able to identify them, the Partnership expects to increase capital through operations.

Interest income on 80% of the Partnership's daily equity maintained in cash was earned at the monthly average 30-day U.S. Treasury bill yield. CGM may continue to maintain the Partnership's assets in cash and/or place all of the Partnership's assets in 90-day Treasury bills and pay the Partnership 80% of the interest earned on the Treasury bills purchased. CGM will retain 20% of any interest earned on Treasury bills. Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased $2,445,873, as compared to the corresponding period in 2004. The increase is due to an increase in net assets and interest rates in 2005 as compared to 2004.

Brokerage commissions are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership's adjusted net asset value on the last day of each month and are affected by trading performance, additions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Commissions and fees for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased $5,820,103 as compared to the corresponding period in 2004. The increase is due to an increase in net assets in 2005 as compared to 2004.

Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership's net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, additions and redemptions. Management fees for the three months ended March 31, 2005 increased $1,817,819 as compared to the corresponding period in 2004. The increase is due to an increase in net assets in 2005 as compared to 2004.

Incentive fees paid quarterly are based on the new trading profits generated by each Advisor as defined in the management agreements between the Partnership, the General Partner and each Advisor. Trading performance for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 resulted in incentive fees of $742,657 and $6,625,747, respectively.

14

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Partnership is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Partnership's assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership's main line of business.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership's open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Partnership's market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects of the Partnership's open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

The Partnership rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership's past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership's speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership's experience to date (i.e., "risk of ruin"). In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership's losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership's attempts to manage its market risk.

Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Partnership as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day interval. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component, which is not relevant to Value at Risk.

15

---

The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership's open positions by market category as of March 31, 2005 and the highest, lowest and average values, during the three months ended March 31, 2005. All open position trading risk exposures of the Partnership have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. As of March 31, 2005, the Partnership's total capitalization was $817,549,565. There has been no material change in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004.

March 31, 2005
(Unaudited)

												Three Months ended March 31, 2005
Market Sector				Value at Risk				% of Total Capitalization				High Value at Risk				Low Value at Risk				Average* Value at Risk
Currencies:
– Exchange Traded Contracts				$	2,369,989				0.29	%		$	5,440,156			$	2,135,345			$	2,911,438
– OTC Contracts					6,758,782				0.83	%			19,828,961				6,758,782				9,188,997
Energy					22,462,426				2.75	%			23,879,190				5,049,742				14,656,763
Grains					5,189,895				0.63	%			6,835,645				2,464,680				4,525,396
Interest Rates U.S.					8,314,842				1.02	%			10,409,895				3,690,541				7,594,220
Interest Rates Non-U.S.					10,500,698				1.28	%			23,876,268				6,637,706				14,008,395
Metals
– Exchange Traded Contracts					2,978,000				0.36	%			5,059,500				994,000				3,455,792
– OTC Contracts					8,044,740				0.98	%			8,647,496				2,714,542				6,625,772
Softs					6,754,810				0.83	%			7,005,716				4,108,968				5,894,234
Indices					17,952,977				2.20	%			32,959,102				17,952,977				22,568,133
Total				$	91,327,159				11.17	%

*	Average of month-end Values at Risk

16

---

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

Based on their evaluation of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2005, the President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner have concluded that such controls and procedures are effective.

During the Partnership's last fiscal quarter, no changes occurred in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.

17

---

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3 "Legal Proceedings" in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

Enron Corp.

In April 2005, Citigroup, along with other financial institution defendants, reached an agreement-in-principle to settle four state-court actions brought by various investment funds, which were not previously consolidated or coordinated with the NEWBY action. The four cases are OCM OPPORTUNITIES FUND III, L.P., et al. v. CITIGROUP INC., et al.; PACIFIC INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT CO. LLC, et al. v. CITIGROUP INC., et al.; AUSA LIFE INSURANCE v. CITIGROUP INC., et al. and PRINCIPAL GLOBAL INVESTORS v. CITIGROUP INC., et al. The amounts to be paid in settlement of these actions are covered by existing litigation reserves.

Dynegy Inc.

The court had previously denied lead plaintiff's motion for leave to amend; no appeal was yet timely while the remainder of the case remained pending. On April 15, 2005, as part of a global settlement involving all defendants, Citigroup entered into a memorandum of understanding to settle this case. The amount to be paid in settlement is covered by existing litigation reserves.

WorldCom, Inc.

The District Court approved the settlement of the IN RE TARGETS SECURITIES LITIGATION on April 22, 2005.

Global Crossing

The plaintiffs and the Citigroup Related Defendants have entered into a definitive settlement agreement in the IN RE GLOBAL CROSSING, LTD SECURITIES LITIGATION; the settlement was preliminarily approved by the Court on March 8, 2005. The amount to be paid in settlement is covered by existing litigation reserves.

Research

Two putative class actions against CGMI asserting common law claims on behalf of CGMI customers in connection with published investment research have been dismissed by United States District Courts, the dismissals of which were affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third and Ninth Circuits, respectively. Plaintiffs in the Ninth Circuit case have sought review by the United States Supreme Court; their petition for a writ of certiorari, which CGMI opposed, is pending before that court.

Mutual Funds

CGMHI entered into a settlement with the SEC with respect to revenue sharing and sales of classes of funds.

Investigations of Euro Zone Government Bonds Trade

The German prosecutors have declined to take any actions against the employees in connection with this matter.

Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

For the three months ended March 31, 2005 there were additional sales of 91,319.2106 Redeemable Units of Limited Partnership totaling $85,102,000. The Redeemable Units were issued in reliance upon

18

---

applicable exemptions from registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 506 of Regulation D promulgated there under.

Proceeds from the sale of additional Redeemable Units are used in the trading of commodity interests including futures contracts, options, forwards and swap contracts.

The following chart sets forth the purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership.

Period				(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased*				(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)**				(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs				(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
January 1, 2005 - - January 31, 2005					7,259.8368			$	905.23				N/A				N/A
February 1, 2005 - February 28, 2005					6,066.7782			$	903.81				N/A				N/A
March 1, 2005 - March 31, 2005					10,487.0579			$	915.16				N/A				N/A
Total					23,813.6729			$	908.07				N/A				N/A

* Generally, Limited Partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on 10 days' notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption but to date the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership's business in connection with effecting redemptions for Limited Partners.

	** Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the last day of each month at the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit as of that day.

Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities – None

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – None

Item 5.    Other Information – None

Item 6.    Exhibits

	The exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-1 are incorporated herein by reference to the exhibit index of the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004.

Exhibit – 31.1 - Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Certification of President and Director)

Exhibit – 31.2 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director)

Exhibit – 32.1 – Section 1350 Certification
(Certification of President and Director).

Exhibit – 32.2 – Section 1350 Certification
(Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director).

19

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CITIGROUP DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.

By:				Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
				(General Partner)
By:				/s/ David J. Vogel
				David J. Vogel President and Director
Date:				May 10, 2005
By:				/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
				Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. Chief Financial Officer and Director
Date:				May 10, 2005

20

---