Results of Operations

During the Partnership's third quarter of 2004, the net asset value per Reedeemable unit increased 6.4% from $1,431.89 to $1,524.17 as compared to a decrease of 8.1% in the third quarter of 2003. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees in the third quarter of 2004 of $1,654,103. Gains were primarily attributable to the Master's trading of commodity futures in energy, grains, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates and were partially offset by losses in currencies, metals, indices, livestock and softs. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before brokerage commissions and related fees in the third quarter of 2003 of $1,669,916. Losses were primarily attributable to the Master's trading of commodity futures in currencies, energy, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates and softs and were partially offset by gains in grains, livestock, metals and indices.

During the Partnership's nine months ended September 30, 2004 the net asset value per Redeemable unit decreased 17.4% from $1,846.04 to $1,524.17 as compared to an increase of 1.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before brokerage commissions and related fees during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 of $2,903,947. Losses were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity futures in softs, livestock, currencies non-U.S. interest rates, metals and indices and were partially offset by gains energy, grains and U.S. interest rates. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before brokerage commissions and related fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 of $2,994,738. Gains were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity futures in currencies, energy, grains, livestock, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, and indices, and were partially offset by losses in metals and softs.

The third quarter of 2004 was characterized by difficult trading conditions for the Partnership's trend-following Advisor for the early part of the quarter and the resurgence of trends across several markets in September. The most significant market for the Partnership's Advisor during the quarter was energy. Trading in crude oil, natural gas and gas oil contributed profits notably in September to bring the Partnership to a profit for the quarter but still down year to date. Energy positions were profitable for all three months as crude oil hit successive highs each month ending September at over $50 per barrel.

The currency sector produced losses as the European and Asian currencies were unable to sustain any solid direction versus a weak U.S. dollar. These choppy market conditions carried over to the U.S. and non-U.S. interest rate markets. Trading nonetheless was profitable in both markets for the quarter. Trading in global stock market indices was unprofitable for the Partnership's Advisor as the lack of direction caused trends to be initiated and only to be reversed a short time later. Trading in grains was profitable for the period while trading in metals and softs was negative for the period.

Overall, after a difficult second quarter and beginning of the third quarter, market trends emerged late in the quarter in both commodity and financial markets that were conducive to the Advisor's trend-following approaches. While a decline in the price of energy is possible in the fourth quarter that might lead to a give-back in open profits over the short term, the overall expectation is for continued directionless financial markets and potentially volatile commodity markets until political, financial and economic trends become more evident.

Commodity futures markets are highly volatile. The potential for broad and rapid price fluctuations increases the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increases the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership (and Master) depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisor to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisor is able to identify them, the Partnership (and Master) expect to increase capital through operations.

Interest income on 80% of the Partnership's average daily equity, allocated to it by the Master, was earned at the monthly average 30 day U.S. Treasury bill rate. CGM may continue to maintain the Master's assets in cash and/or place all of the Master's assets in 90-day Treasury bills and pay the Partnership its allocated share of 80% of the interest earned on the Treasury bills purchased. CGM will retain 20% of any interest earned on Treasury bills. Interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2004

17

increased by $4,327, as compared to the corresponding period in 2003. The increase in interest income is primarily due to an increase in interest rates during the three months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the corresponding period in 2003. Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 decreased by $39,647 as compared to the corresponding period in 2003. The decrease in interest income is primarily due to lower net assets during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the corresponding period in 2003.

Brokerage commissions are calculated on the Partnership's adjusted net asset value on the last day of each month and are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be analyzed in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Commissions and fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 decreased by $125,570 and $369,067, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2003. The decrease in brokerage commissions is due to lower net assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2003.

Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership's net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Management fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 decreased by $41,676 and $114,794, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2003. The decrease in management fees is due to lower net assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2003.

Administrative fees are paid to the General Partner for administering the business and affairs of the Partnership. These fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership's net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance and redemptions. Administrative fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 decreased by $20,838 and $57,398, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2003. The decrease in administrative fees is due to lower net assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2003.

Incentive fees are based on the new trading profits generated by the Advisor as defined in the advisory agreement between the Partnership, the General Partner and the Advisor. Trading performance for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 resulted in incentive fees of $0 and $178,139, respectively. There were no incentive fees earned for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004.

18

---

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

All of the Partnership's assets are subject to the risk of trading loss through its investment in the Master. The Master is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Master's assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Master's main line of business.

The risk to the limited partners that have purchased interests in the Partnership is limited to the amount of their capital contributions to the Partnership and their share of the Partnership's assets and undistributed profits. This limited liability is a consequence of the organization of the Partnership as a limited partnership under applicable law.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Master's open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Master's market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects of the Master's open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

The Master rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Master's past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Master could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Master's speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Master of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Master's experience to date (i.e., "risk of ruin"). In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Master's losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Master's attempts to manage its market risk.

Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Master as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day interval. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component, which is not relevant to Value at Risk.

19

---

The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the Master's open positions by market category as of September 30, 2004 and the highest, lowest and average values during the three months ended September 30, 2004. All open position trading risk exposures of the Master have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. As of September 30, 2004, the Master's total capitalization was $157,467,719. There have been no material changes in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)

												Three Months Ended September 30, 2004
Market Sector				Value at Risk				% of Total Capitalization				High Value at Risk				Low Value at Risk				Average*
Currencies:
– OTC				$	10,817,840				6.87	%		$	12,721,847			$	6,316,286			$	9,008,705
Energy					7,910,835				5.02	%			7,910,835				4,509,445				5,895,006
Grains					708,200				0.45	%			1,044,250				427,438				809,000
Interest Rates U.S.					2,347,000				1.49	%			2,351,750				1,195,245				2,061,850
Interest Rates Non-U.S.					9,284,320				5.90	%			9,284,320				3,991,572				7,227,717
Livestock					140,670				0.09	%			193,200				23,100				161,690
Metals
– Exchange Traded Contracts					1,498,000				0.95	%			1,697,000				144,500				1,509,000
– OTC					1,434,675				0.91	%			1,879,835				939,150				1,454,897
Softs					1,112,717				0.71	%			1,172,315				687,381				935,858
Indices					3,351,639				2.13	%			4,858,730				1,829,401				3,825,630
Total				$	38,605,896				24.52	%

*   Average of the month-end Values at Risk

20

---

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

Based on their evaluation of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2004, the President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner have concluded that such controls and procedures are effective.

During the Partnership's last fiscal quarter, no changes occurred in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.

21

---

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3 "Legal Proceedings" in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and under Part II, Item 1 "Legal Proceedings" in the Partnership's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004.

Enron Corp.

A Citigroup affiliate, along with other defendants, settled all claims against it in IN RE NEWPOWER HOLDINGS SECURITIES LITIGATION, a class action brought on behalf of certain investors in NewPower securities. Citigroup reached this settlement agreement without admitting any wrongdoing. On September 13, 2004, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York preliminarily approved the settlement.

Dynegy Inc.

On October 7, 2004, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted the motion to dismiss all claims against the Citigroup defendants in IN RE DYNEGY INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. The District Court also denied lead plaintiff's request for leave to replead. The case was a putative class action brought on behalf of purchasers of publicly traded Dynegy debt and equity securities.

WorldCom, Inc.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed the orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying plaintiffs' motions to remand to state court a large group of WorldCom-related actions. On September 13, 2004, plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court seeking review of the Second Circuit's ruling.

On September 17, 2004, WEINSTEIN, ET AL. V. EBBERS, ET AL., a putative class action against CGM and others brought on behalf of holders of WorldCom securities asserting claims based on, among other things, CGM's research reports concerning WorldCom, was dismissed with prejudice in its entirety by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs have noticed an appeal of the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Citigroup and CGM, along with a number of other defendants, have settled RETIREMENT SYSTEMS OF ALABAMA, ET AL. V. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL., a WorldCom individual action that had been remanded to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama. The settlement became final on September 30, 2004.

On June 28, 2004, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed all claims under the Securities Act of 1933 and certain claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in IN RE TARGETS SECURITIES LITIGATION, a putative class action against Citigroup and CGM and certain former employees, leaving only claims under the 1934 Act for purchases of Targeted Growth Enhanced Terms Securities With Respect to the Common Stock of MCI WorldCom, Inc. ("TARGETS") after July 30, 1999. On October 20, 2004, the parties signed a Memorandum of Understanding setting forth the terms of a settlement of all remaining claims in this action. The settlement must be approved by the Court.

On November 5, 2004, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York approved the class settlement between plaintiffs and the Citigroup-related defendants in IN RE WORLDCOM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. The Court's approval is subject to possible appeal by plaintiffs.

Research

Several individual actions have been filed against Citigroup and CGM relating to, among other things, research on Qwest Communications International, Inc. alleging violations of state and federal securities laws.

22

---

Other

On October 13, 2004, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York certified a class in various representative cases with respect to the allocation of shares for certain initial public offerings and related aftermarket transactions.

An appeal of the dismissal granted to CGM in November 2003 with respect to the antitrust case relating to the allocation of shares for certain initial public offerings is scheduled to be argued in December 2004.

Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following chart sets forth the purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership.

Period				(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased*				(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)**				(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs				(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1, 2004 – July 31, 2004					16.2556			$	1,391.25				N/A				N/A
August 1, 2004 – August 31, 2004					4.0000			$	1,391.41				N/A				N/A
September 1, 2004 – September 30, 2004					2.0000			$	1,524.17				N/A				N/A
Total					22.2556			$	1,435.61				N/A				N/A

* Generally, Limited Partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on 10 days' notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption but to date the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership's business in connection with effecting redemptions for Limited Partners.

	** Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the last day of each month at the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit as of that day.

Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities – None

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – None

Item 5.    Other Information

In the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004, the Partnership inadvertently placed, on each of the cover pages to such filings, a check mark next to "Yes" under the statement, "Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)." The Partnership is not, and has never been, an "accelerated filer" (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

23

---

Item 6.    Exhibits

	The exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are incorporated herein by reference to the exhibit index of the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003.

Exhibit – 31.1 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
(Certifications of President and Director)

Exhibit – 31.2 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
(Certifications of Chief Financial Officer and Director)

Exhibit – 32.1 – Section 1350 Certifications
(Certification of President and Director).

Exhibit – 32.2 – Section 1350 Certifications
(Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director).

24

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

SMITH BARNEY MID-WEST FUTURES FUND L.P. II

By:				Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
				(General Partner)
By:				/s/ David J. Vogel
				David J. Vogel President and Director
Date:				11/12/04
By:				/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
				Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. Chief Financial Officer and Director
Date:				11/12/04

24

---