rates and were partially offset by losses in currencies, U.S. interest rates, livestock, metals, indices and softs. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before brokerage commissions and related fees during the three months ended September 30, 2003 of $6,320,153. Losses were primarily attributable to the trading of commodity contracts in currencies, livestock, metals, softs, indices and U.S. interest rates and were partially offset by gains in energy, grains and non-U.S. interest rates.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2004, the Partnership Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit decreased 8.5% from $967.61 to $885.34 as compared to a decrease of 10.4% in the period from May 1, 2003 (commencement of trading operations) through September 30, 2003. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before brokerage commissions and related fees during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 of $26,982,813. Losses were primarily attributable to currencies, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates, metals, softs and indices and were partially offset by gains in energy, grains and livestock. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss before brokerage commissions and related fees during the period May 1, 2003 to September 30, 2003 of $11,333,003. Losses were primarily attributable to currencies, metals, softs, indices, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates and were partially offset by gains in energy, grains and livestock.

The third quarter of 2004 was characterized by continued difficult trading conditions for the Partnership's trend-following Advisors. The currency sector produced the greatest losses as the European and Asian currencies were unable to sustain any solid direction versus a weak U.S. dollar. These choppy market conditions carried over to the U.S. interest rate markets as the Federal Reserve Bank tightened short-term rates in spite of persistent market-driven lower long-term interest rates. Trading in non-U.S. interest rate markets was profitable. Trading in global stock market indices was also unprofitable for the Partnership's Advisors as the same lack of direction caused trends to be initiated and only a short time later to be reversed.

The most significant market for the Partnership during the quarter was energy. Trading in crude oil, natural gas and gas oil contributed to profits notably in September to bring the Partnership back to near flat for the quarter. Energy positions were profitable for all three months as crude oil hit successive highs each month ending September at over $50 per barrel. Trading in grains was profitable for the period while trading in metals and softs was slightly negative for the period.

Overall, after a difficult second quarter and beginning of the third quarter, market trends emerged late in the quarter in both commodity and financial markets that were conducive to the Advisors' trend-following approaches. While a decline in the price of energy is possible in the fourth quarter that might lead to a give-back in open profits over the short term, the overall expectation is for continued directionless financial markets until political, financial and economic trends become more evident.

Commodity futures markets are highly volatile. The potential for broad and rapid price fluctuations increases the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increases the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisors to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisors are able to identify them, the Partnership expects to increase capital through operations.

Interest income on 80% of the Partnership's daily equity maintained in cash was earned at the monthly average 30-day U.S. Treasury bill yield. CGM may continue to maintain the Partnership's assets in cash and/or place all of the Partnership's assets in 90-day Treasury bills and pay the Partnership 80% of the interest earned on the Treasury bills purchased. CGM will retain 20% of any interest earned on Treasury bills. Interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 increased $1,522,663 and $3,217,638, respectively, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2003 and the period from May 1, 2003 (commencement of trading operations) to September 30, 2003. The increase is due to an increase in net assets and interest rates in 2004 as compared to 2003.

Brokerage commissions are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership's adjusted net asset value on the last day of each month and are affected by trading performance, additions and redemptions.

13

Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in the monthly net asset values. Commissions and fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 increased $8,115,516 and $22,721,624, respectively, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2003 and the period from May 1, 2003 (commencement of trading operations) to September 30, 2003. The increase is due to an increase in net assets in 2004 as compared to 2003.

Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership's net asset value as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, additions and redemptions. Management fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 increased $2,385,828 and $6,790,174, respectively, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2003 and the period from May 1, 2003 (commencement of trading operations) to September 30, 2003. The increase is due to an increase in net assets in 2004 as compared to 2003.

Incentive fees paid quarterly are based on the new trading profits generated by each Advisor as defined in the management agreements between the Partnership, the General Partner and each Advisor. Trading performance for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 resulted in incentive fees of $0 and $6,625,747, respectively.

14

---

Item 3.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Partnership is a speculative commodity pool. The market sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Partnership's assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership's main line of business.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership's open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Partnership's market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects of the Partnership's open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

The Partnership rapidly acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership's past performance is not necessarily indicative of its future results.

Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership's speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership's experience to date (i.e., "risk of ruin"). In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership's losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Partnership's attempts to manage its market risk.

Exchange maintenance margin requirements have been used by the Partnership as the measure of its Value at Risk. Maintenance margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day interval. Maintenance margin has been used rather than the more generally available initial margin, because initial margin includes a credit risk component, which is not relevant to Value at Risk.

15

---

The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership's open positions by market category as of September 30, 2004 and the highest, lowest and average values, during the three months ended September 30, 2004. All open position trading risk exposures of the Partnership have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. As of September 30, 2004, the Partnership's total capitalization was $686,543,456. There has been no material change in the trading Value at Risk information previously disclosed in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

September 30, 2004
(Unaudited)

												Three Months Ended September 30, 2004
Market Sector				Value at Risk				% of Total Capitalization				High Value at Risk				Low Value at Risk				Average* Value at Risk
Currencies:
– Exchange Traded Contracts				$	7,073,679				1.03	%		$	8,967,160			$	1,877,712			$	4,775,086
– OTC Contracts					7,818,332				1.14	%			8,377,420				4,180,412				7,280,492
Energy					18,063,800				2.63	%			18,063,800				7,585,979				12,551,104
Grains					4,376,213				0.64	%			6,270,868				3,207,957				5,131,292
Interest Rates U.S.					10,328,090				1.50	%			11,382,700				2,905,375				8,646,962
Interest Rates Non-U.S.					24,909,030				3.63	%			26,128,642				13,568,958				21,983,257
Livestock					178,400				0.03	%			936,000				163,200				342,267
Metals
– Exchange Traded Contracts					6,334,500				0.92	%			7,055,500				1,321,000				4,930,333
– OTC Contracts					3,777,383				0.55	%			5,594,103				2,564,835				4,117,991
Softs					3,087,816				0.45	%			4,751,109				1,294,241				3,321,900
Indices					12,296,322				1.79	%			17,866,799				7,108,341				13,406,837
Total				$	98,243,565				14.31	%

*	average of month-end values at risk

16

---

Item 4.    Controls and Procedures

Based on their evaluation of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2004, the President and Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner have concluded that such controls and procedures are effective.

During the Partnership's last fiscal quarter, no changes occurred in the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting.

17

---

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings

The following information supplements and amends our discussion set forth under Part I, Item 3 "Legal Proceedings" in the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and under Part II, Item I, "Legal Proceedings" in the Partnership's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2004.

Enron Corp.

A Citigroup affiliate, along with other defendants, settled all claims against it in IN RE NEWPOWER HOLDINGS SECURITIES LITIGATION, a class action brought on behalf of certain investors in NewPower securities. Citigroup reached this settlement agreement without admitting any wrongdoing. On September 13, 2004, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York preliminarily approved the settlement.

Dynegy Inc.

On October 7, 2004, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas granted the motion to dismiss all claims against the Citigroup defendants in IN RE DYNEGY INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION. The District Court also denied lead plaintiff's request for leave to replead. The case was a putative class action brought on behalf of purchasers of publicly traded Dynegy debt and equity securities.

WorldCom, Inc.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has affirmed the orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying plaintiffs' motions to remand to state court a large group of WorldCom-related actions. On September 13, 2004, plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court seeking review of the Second Circuit's ruling.

On September 17, 2004, WEINSTEIN, ET AL. V. EBBERS, ET AL., a putative class action against CGM and others brought on behalf of holders of WorldCom securities asserting claims based on, among other things, CGM's research reports concerning WorldCom, was dismissed with prejudice in its entirety by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiffs have noticed an appeal of the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

Citigroup and CGM, along with a number of other defendants, have settled RETIREMENT SYSTEMS OF ALABAMA, ET AL. V. J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO., ET AL., a WorldCom individual action that had been remanded to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama. The settlement became final on September 30, 2004.

On June 28, 2004, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed all claims under the Securities Act of 1933 and certain claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in IN RE TARGETS SECURITIES LITIGATION, a putative class action against Citigroup and CGM and certain former employees, leaving only claims under the 1934 Act for purchases of Targeted Growth Enhanced Terms Securities With Respect to the Common Stock of MCI WorldCom, Inc. ("TARGETS") after July 30, 1999. On October 20, 2004, the parties signed a Memorandum of Understanding setting forth the terms of a settlement of all remaining claims in this action. The settlement must be approved by the Court.

A fairness hearing will be held on November 5, 2004 in connection with the proposed class settlement between plaintiffs and the Citigroup-related defendants in IN RE WORLDCOM, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION.

Research

Several individual actions have been filed against Citigroup and CGM relating to, among other things, research on Qwest Communications International, Inc. alleging violations of state and federal securities laws.

18

---

Other

On October 13, 2004, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York certified a class in various representative cases with respect to the allocation of shares for certain initial public offerings and related aftermarket transactions.

An appeal of the dismissal granted to CGM in November 2003 with respect to the antitrust case relating to the allocation of shares for certain initial public offerings is scheduled to be argued in December 2004.

Item 2.    Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The use of proceeds information is being disclosed for Registration Statement Nos. 333-102038 and 333-110076 and Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-110076, filed pursuant to Commission Rule 429, declared effective on March 27, 2003, December 4, 2003 and September 7, 2004, respectively.

For the account of the Partnership, the amount of Redeemable Units sold as of September 30, 2004 is 812,357.8289 and the aggregate offering price of the amount sold as of September 30, 2004 is $780,378,000.

From the effective date of the first Registration Statement to September 30, 2004, the net offering proceeds to the Partnership totaled $780,378,000.

From the effective date of the first Registration Statement to September 30, 2004 the amount of net offering proceeds to the Partnership for trading of commodity interests, including future contracts and forward contracts, totaled $780,378,000.

The following chart sets forth the purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership.

Period				(a) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased*				(b) Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)**				(c) Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs				(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1, 2004 - July 31, 2004					5,317.7164			$	884.89				N/A				N/A
August 1, 2004 - August 31, 2004					5,957.2971			$	863.82				N/A				N/A
September 1, 2004 - September 30, 2004					11,205.0944			$	885.79				N/A				N/A
Total					22,480.1079			$	878.17				N/A				N/A

* Generally, Limited Partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on 10 days' notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption but to date the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership's business in connection with effecting redemptions for Limited Partners.

	** Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the last day of each month at the Net Asset Value per Redeemable Unit as of that day.

Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities – None

Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders – None

Item 5.    Other Information – None

19

---

Item 6.    Exhibits

	The exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S-1 are incorporated herein by reference to the exhibit index of the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003.

Exhibit – 31.1 - Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Certification of President and Director)

Exhibit – 31.2 – Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director)

Exhibit – 32.1 – Section 1350 Certification
(Certification of President and Director).

Exhibit – 32.2 – Section 1350 Certification
(Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director).

20

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CITIGROUP DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.

By:				Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
				(General Partner)
By:
				David J. Vogel President and Director
Date:				November 9, 2004
By:
				Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. Chief Financial Officer and Director
Date:				November 9, 2004

21

---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

CITIGROUP DIVERSIFIED FUTURES FUND L.P.

By:				Citigroup Managed Futures LLC
				(General Partner)
By:				/s/ David J. Vogel
				David J. Vogel President and Director
Date:				November 9, 2004
By:				/s/ Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr.
				Daniel R. McAuliffe, Jr. Chief Financial Officer and Director
Date:				November 9, 2004

22

---