Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
MARCH 31, 2005 |
or |
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
Commission file number 0-27275
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
04-3432319 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification Number) |
8 Cambridge Center
Cambridge, MA 02142
(617) 444-3000
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including
Area Code,
of Registrants Principal Executive Offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes þ No o
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common
stock as of May 6, 2005: 127,675,753 shares.
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1. |
Financial Statements |
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) | |
ASSETS |
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
39,881 |
|
|
$ |
35,318 |
|
|
Marketable securities (including restricted securities of $932
at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively)
|
|
|
44,534 |
|
|
|
35,312 |
|
|
|
Accounts receivable (net of reserves of $4,371 and $5,422 at
March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively)
|
|
|
34,285 |
|
|
|
30,333 |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
6,337 |
|
|
|
7,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
125,037 |
|
|
|
108,669 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
31,007 |
|
|
|
25,242 |
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
29,884 |
|
|
|
34,065 |
|
Restricted marketable securities
|
|
|
3,722 |
|
|
|
3,722 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,937 |
|
|
|
4,937 |
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
6,844 |
|
|
|
5,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
201,610 |
|
|
$ |
182,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT |
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
13,202 |
|
|
$ |
10,349 |
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
32,903 |
|
|
|
32,097 |
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
2,816 |
|
|
|
2,695 |
|
|
Current portion of obligations under capital leases and vendor
financing
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
Current portion of accrued restructuring
|
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
1,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
50,399 |
|
|
|
46,766 |
|
Accrued restructuring, net of current portion
|
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
2,259 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3,180 |
|
|
|
3,035 |
|
1% convertible senior notes
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes
|
|
|
56,614 |
|
|
|
56,614 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
312,113 |
|
|
|
308,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (Note 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders deficit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares
authorized; 700,000 shares designated as Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock; no shares issued or
outstanding at March 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 700,000,000 shares
authorized; 127,399,804 shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2005; 126,771,799 shares issued and
outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
3,453,220 |
|
|
|
3,451,578 |
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
(937 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(3,565,153 |
) |
|
|
(3,579,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders deficit
|
|
|
(110,503 |
) |
|
|
(125,931 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders deficit
|
|
$ |
201,610 |
|
|
$ |
182,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per | |
|
|
share data) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
$ |
59,579 |
|
|
$ |
47,431 |
|
|
Software and software-related
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
60,096 |
|
|
|
48,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
11,524 |
|
|
|
12,146 |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
3,629 |
|
|
|
2,694 |
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
16,745 |
|
|
|
14,010 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,839 |
|
|
|
11,197 |
|
|
Amortization of other intangible assets
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and operating expenses
|
|
|
43,749 |
|
|
|
40,059 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
16,347 |
|
|
|
8,308 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(1,611 |
) |
|
|
(3,756 |
) |
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(726 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,018 |
) |
Gain on investments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
14,608 |
|
|
|
3,005 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
14,079 |
|
|
$ |
2,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Shares used in per share calculation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
127,051 |
|
|
|
122,104 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
147,282 |
|
|
|
133,825 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months | |
|
|
Ended March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
14,079 |
|
|
$ |
2,921 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
4,140 |
|
|
|
6,497 |
|
|
|
Equity-related compensation
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
Non-cash portion of loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
Loss on investments, property and equipment and foreign
currency, net
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
(206 |
) |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(4,761 |
) |
|
|
(3,333 |
) |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
777 |
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
4,878 |
|
|
|
(2,204 |
) |
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring
|
|
|
(352 |
) |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
|
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(1,365 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
18,702 |
|
|
|
8,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property and equipment
|
|
|
(7,598 |
) |
|
|
(1,288 |
) |
|
|
Capitalization of internal-use software costs
|
|
|
(2,121 |
) |
|
|
(1,754 |
) |
|
|
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
Purchases of investments
|
|
|
(10,544 |
) |
|
|
(121,418 |
) |
|
|
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments
|
|
|
5,203 |
|
|
|
171,725 |
|
|
|
Decrease in restricted cash held for note repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(15,060 |
) |
|
|
52,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of 1% convertible senior notes,
net of financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,313 |
|
|
|
Repurchase and retirement of
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,873 |
) |
|
|
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock under stock option
plans
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
2,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
|
|
(36,513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate translation on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(588 |
) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
4,563 |
|
|
|
23,829 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
35,318 |
|
|
|
105,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
39,881 |
|
|
$ |
129,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
$ |
229 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
1,570 |
|
|
$ |
8,772 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1. |
Nature of Business, Basis of Presentation and Principles of
Consolidation |
Akamai Technologies, Inc. (Akamai or the
Company) provides services for accelerating and
improving the delivery of content and business processes over
the Internet. Akamais globally distributed platform
comprises more than 16,000 servers in nearly 1,000 networks
in 69 countries. The Company was incorporated in Delaware in
1998 and is headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Akamai
currently operates in one business segment: providing global
services for accelerating and improving delivery of content and
business processes over the Internet.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of
Akamai have been prepared in accordance with the rules and
regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission (the SEC). The financial information
included herein, other than the condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2004, has been prepared without
audit. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2004 has been derived from, but does not
include all the disclosures contained in, the audited
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2004. In the opinion of management, these
unaudited statements include all adjustments and accruals
consisting only of normal recurring adjustments that are
necessary for a fair presentation of the results of all interim
periods reported herein. These condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes included in
Akamais Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2004. The results of operations for the
interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the
results that may be expected for future periods.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Akamai and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries. Intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation. Certain reclassifications of prior
year amounts have been made to conform to current year
presentation. In connection with the preparation of the
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements, the
Company concluded that it was appropriate to classify its
investments in auction rate securities as short-term
available-for-sale investments. Previously, such investments
were classified as cash and cash equivalents. Accordingly, the
Company has made revisions to the accompanying condensed
consolidated statement of cash flows to reflect the gross
purchases and sales of these securities as investing activities.
As a result, cash used in investing activities increased by
$51.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2004. This revision in classification does not affect previously
reported cash flows from operations or from financing activities
for any period.
|
|
2. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards(SFAS) No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment (revised 2004), which is a
revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes Accounting
Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
SFAS No. 123R requires all share-based payments to
employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be
valued at fair value on the date of grant, and to be expensed
over the applicable vesting period. Pro forma disclosure of the
income statement effects of share-based payments is no longer an
alternative. SFAS No. 123R is effective for the first
annual period beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company
expects to adopt this standard as of the beginning of fiscal
year 2006 under the modified prospective transition method.
Under this method, a company records compensation expense for
all new awards and awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled
after the required effective date. In addition, companies must
also recognize compensation expense related to any awards that
are not fully vested as of the effective date. Compensation
expense for the unvested awards will be measured based on the
fair value of the awards previously calculated in developing the
pro forma disclosure in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123. The Company is currently assessing the
impact of adopting
4
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
SFAS No. 123R to its consolidated results of
operations but expects that the adoption will have a material
impact. The pro forma information included in Note 3
reflects what the impact of applying SFAS No. 123R would
have been for periods presented.
In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 107, Share-Based Payment.
SAB No. 107 was issued to assist preparers by
providing guidance regarding the application of
SFAS No. 123R. SAB No. 107 describes the
Staffs views on share-based payment transactions with
non-employees and covers key topics including valuation models,
expected volatility and expected term. The Company will apply
the principles of SAB No. 107 in conjunction with its
adoption of SFAS No. 123R during the first quarter of
2006.
|
|
3. |
Equity-Related Compensation |
Akamai accounts for stock-based awards to employees using the
intrinsic value method as prescribed by APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
related interpretations. Accordingly, no compensation expense is
recorded for stock-based awards issued to employees and
directors in fixed amounts and with fixed exercise prices at
least equal to the fair market value of the Companys
common stock at the date of grant. Compensation expense is
recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for
restricted stock grants, deferred stock units and stock options
granted where the exercise price is below the market price on
the date of grant. Akamai applies the provisions of SFAS
No. 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and
Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, through
disclosure only for stock-based awards issued to employees and
directors. All stock-based awards to non-employees are accounted
for at their fair value in accordance with
SFAS No. 123.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and net
income per share if the Company had accounted for stock options
issued to employees and directors under the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by
SFAS No. 148 (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
14,079 |
|
|
$ |
2,921 |
|
|
|
Add: stock-based employee compensation included in reported net
income
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
Deduct: stock-based employee compensation expense determined
under fair value method for all awards
|
|
|
(7,527 |
) |
|
|
(10,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
6,773 |
|
|
$ |
(7,391 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
Pro forma
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
5
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The fair value of each option granted during the three months
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the
following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Risk-free interest rate (%)
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Volatility (%)
|
|
|
81.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Dividend yield (%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, the
weighted average fair value of options granted at market value
on the date of grant was $8.12 and $10.92, respectively, per
share.
Basic net income per share is computed using the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the
applicable quarter. Diluted net income per share is computed
using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding
during the quarter, plus the dilutive effect of potential common
stock. Potential common stock consists of stock options,
deferred stock units, warrants, unvested restricted common stock
and convertible notes.
The following table sets forth the components used in the
computation of basic and diluted net income per common share (in
thousands, except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
14,079 |
|
|
$ |
2,291 |
|
|
Add back of interest expense on 1% convertible senior notes
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator for diluted net income
|
|
$ |
14,789 |
|
|
$ |
2,291 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per common share
|
|
|
127,051 |
|
|
|
122,104 |
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
7,154 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
Restricted common stock and deferred stock units
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
11,410 |
|
|
|
|
1% convertible senior notes
|
|
|
12,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per common share
|
|
|
147,282 |
|
|
|
133,825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
6
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following potential common shares have been excluded from
the computation of diluted net income per share for the periods
presented because their effect would have been antidilutive (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Stock options
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
|
3,023 |
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
1% convertible senior notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,945 |
|
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
1,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5,017 |
|
|
|
17,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the calculation of comprehensive
income and its components (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Net income
|
|
$ |
14,079 |
|
|
$ |
2,921 |
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
Unrealized (loss) gain on investments
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
13,556 |
|
|
$ |
2,905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the periods presented, accumulated other comprehensive
income consisted of (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
As of | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$ |
1,569 |
|
|
$ |
1,792 |
|
Net unrealized loss on investments
|
|
|
(700 |
) |
|
|
(400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
869 |
|
|
$ |
1,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
Restricted Marketable Securities |
As of March 31, 2005, the Company had issued
$4.6 million in irrevocable letters of credit in favor of
third-party beneficiaries, primarily related to facility leases.
The letters of credit are collateralized by restricted
marketable securities, of which $3.7 million are classified
as long-term marketable securities and $932,000 are classified
as short-term marketable securities on the condensed
consolidated balance sheet dated as of March 31, 2005. The
restrictions on these marketable securities lapse as the Company
fulfills its obligations or as such obligations expire as
provided by the letters of credit. These restrictions are
expected to lapse at various times through May 2009.
7
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7. |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
Financial instruments that subject the Company to credit risk
consist of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities and
accounts receivable. The Company maintains the majority of its
cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances
principally with domestic financial institutions that the
Company believes are of high credit standing. Concentrations of
credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited to
certain customers to which the Company makes substantial sales.
To reduce risk, the Company routinely assesses the financial
strength of its customers and, as a consequence, believes that
its accounts receivable credit risk exposure is limited. As of
March 31, 2005, one customer accounted for approximately
11% of the Companys accounts receivable balance. No other
customer accounted for 10% or more of accounts receivable as of
March 31, 2005 or as of December 31, 2004.
Net accounts receivable consists of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
As of | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Trade accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
34,256 |
|
|
$ |
31,175 |
|
Unbilled accounts
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
4,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gross accounts receivable
|
|
|
38,656 |
|
|
|
35,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(1,327 |
) |
|
|
(928 |
) |
Reserve for cash basis customers
|
|
|
(1,683 |
) |
|
|
(2,375 |
) |
Reserve for service credits
|
|
|
(1,361 |
) |
|
|
(2,119 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable reserves
|
|
|
(4,371 |
) |
|
|
(5,422 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net
|
|
$ |
34,285 |
|
|
$ |
30,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
Asset Retirement Obligation |
In January 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.
SFAS No. 143 addresses the accounting and reporting
requirements for obligations associated with the retirement of
tangible long-lived assets. As a result of adoption of this
statement, the Company recorded an asset retirement obligation
and associated long-lived asset of $109,000 as of
January 1, 2003 for the fair value of a contractual
obligation to remove leasehold improvements at the conclusion of
the Companys facility lease in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
The obligation and asset are classified on the Companys
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2005
as non-current liabilities and property and equipment,
respectively. The Company will amortize the asset and accrete
the obligation over the remaining life of the associated
leasehold improvements. As of March 31, 2005, the Company
has approximately $120,000 recorded as the non-current asset
obligation.
8
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of | |
|
As of | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Payroll and benefits
|
|
$ |
9,489 |
|
|
$ |
8,797 |
|
Interest
|
|
|
1,361 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
Bandwidth and co-location fees
|
|
|
5,818 |
|
|
|
5,546 |
|
Property, use and other taxes
|
|
|
12,701 |
|
|
|
13,487 |
|
Legal professional fees
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
871 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
|
|
1,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
32,903 |
|
|
$ |
32,097 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. |
Restructurings and Lease Terminations |
As of March 31, 2005, the Company had $3.3 million of
accrued restructuring liabilities. No restructuring charges were
recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004.
The following table summarizes the restructuring activity for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring | |
|
|
Liabilities | |
|
|
| |
Ending balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
3.6 |
|
|
Cash payments during the three months ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, March 31, 2005
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of accrued restructuring liabilities
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of accrued restructuring liabilities
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
All existing restructuring liabilities will be fully paid
through August 2007. The amount of restructuring liabilities
associated with facility leases has been estimated based on the
most recent available market data and discussions with the
Companys lessors and real estate advisors as to the
likelihood that the Company will be able to partially offset its
obligations with sublease income. As of March 31, 2005,
there was approximately $33,000 of estimated future sublease
income netted in the restructuring balance.
|
|
|
51/2% Convertible
Subordinated Notes |
In June 2000, Akamai issued $300.0 million in aggregate
principal amount of
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes due July 1, 2007 for aggregate net
proceeds of $290.2 million (net of initial purchaser fees
and other offering expenses of $9.8 million). As of
March 31, 2005, the Company had $56.6 million in
aggregate principal amount of its
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes outstanding. The
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes are convertible at any time into the
Companys common stock at a conversion price of
$115.47 per share (equivalent to 8.6603 shares of
common stock per $1,000 principal amount of
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes), subject to adjustment in certain events. In
the event of a change of control, Akamai may be required to
repurchase the
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes at a repurchase price of 100% of the
9
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
principal amount together with accrued and unpaid interest.
Interest on the
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes began to accrue as of the issue date and is
payable semiannually on January 1 and July 1 of each year.
The
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes are unsecured obligations and are
subordinated to all existing and future senior indebtedness of
Akamai. Deferred financing costs of $9.8 million, including
underwriting fees and other offering expenses, for the
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes are being amortized over the term of the
notes. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004,
amortization of deferred financing costs was $66,000 and
$233,000, respectively.
During the three months ended March 31, 2004, in
individually negotiated transactions, the Company repurchased an
aggregate of $25.0 million in principal amount of its
outstanding
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the
principal amount plus accrued interest. Additionally, in
February 2004, the Company commenced a tender offer to
repurchase up to $101.0 million in aggregate principal
amount of its outstanding
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes at a purchase price between $1,000 and $1,005
for each $1,000 of principal amount tendered. In March 2004, the
Company amended the tender offer to increase the maximum price
at which it was willing to repurchase the
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes to $1,012.50 per $1,000 principal amount
of the notes. Pursuant to the tender offer, in March 2004, the
Company repurchased $37.9 million in aggregate principal
amount of the
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes for a total cash payment of
$38.3 million. The purchase price was $1,012.50 for each
$1,000 of principal amount tendered. For the three months ended
March 31, 2004, the Company amortized the outstanding
deferred financing costs relating the repurchased notes and the
premium paid of $977,000 and $474,000, respectively, to loss on
early extinguishment of debt. Additionally, the Company incurred
$567,000 of advisory services and offering expenses in
connection with the tender offer and repurchases, which is
included in loss on early extinguishment of debt.
|
|
|
1% Convertible Senior Notes |
In December 2003 and January 2004, Akamai issued
$200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
1% convertible senior notes due December 15, 2033 for
aggregate net proceeds of $194.1 million, net of an initial
purchasers discount and offering expenses of
$5.9 million. The initial conversion price of the
1% convertible senior notes is $15.45 per share
(equivalent to 64.7249 shares of common stock per $1,000
principal amount of 1% convertible senior notes). The notes
may be converted into shares of the Companys common stock
at the option of the holder in the following circumstances:
|
|
|
|
|
during any calendar quarter commencing after March 31,
2004, if the closing sale price of the common stock for at least
20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days
ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter
is more than 120% of the conversion price in effect on such last
trading day; |
|
|
|
if the convertible notes are called for redemption; |
|
|
|
if the Company makes specified distributions on its common stock
or engages in specified transactions; or |
|
|
|
during the five trading day period immediately following any ten
consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per
$1,000 principal amount of the convertible notes for each day of
such ten day period is less than 95% of the product of the
closing sale price per share of the Companys common stock
on that day multiplied by the number of shares of its common
stock issuable upon conversion of $1,000 principal amount of the
convertible notes. |
The Company may redeem the 1% convertible senior notes on
or after December 15, 2010 at the Companys option at
100% of the principal amount together with accrued and unpaid
interest. Conversely, holders of the 1% convertible senior
notes may require the Company to repurchase the notes at par
value on
10
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
certain specified dates beginning on December 15, 2010. In
the event of a change of control, the holders may require Akamai
to repurchase their 1% convertible senior notes at a
repurchase price of 100% of the principal amount plus accrued
interest. Interest on the 1% convertible senior notes began
to accrue as of the issue date and is payable semiannually on
June 15 and December 15 of each year. The 1% convertible
senior notes are senior unsecured obligations and are the same
rank as all existing and future senior indebtedness of Akamai.
The 1% convertible senior notes rank senior to all of our
subordinated indebtedness, including the
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes due 2007. Deferred financing costs of
$5.9 million, including the initial purchasers
discount and other offering expenses, for the
1% convertible senior notes are being amortized over the
first seven years of the term of the notes to reflect the put
and call rights discussed above. Amortization of deferred
financing costs of the 1% convertible senior notes was
$210,000 and $208,000 for the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004, respectively. Using the interest method, the
Company records the amortization of deferred financing costs as
interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations.
On April 21, 2005, the Companys Board of Directors
approved amendments to the Companys 1999 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan (1999 ESPP). The amendments to the
1999 ESPP are as follows: the duration of the offering periods
was changed from 24 months to six months; the number of
times a participant may elect to change his or her percentage
was changed from four times to two times; the definition of
compensation was amended to clarify that it includes
cash bonuses and other cash incentive payments; and a provision
was added to clarify that upon termination of an offering
period, each eligible participant will be automatically enrolled
in the next offering period. The amendments will be effective as
of June 1, 2005, the commencement of the next offering
period under the 1999 ESPP.
|
|
14. |
Segment and Enterprise-Wide Disclosure |
Akamais chief decision-maker, as defined under
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, is the Chief Executive
Officer and the executive management team. As of March 31,
2005, Akamai operated in one business segment: providing global
services for accelerating and improving the delivery of content
and business processes over the Internet.
The Company deploys its servers into networks worldwide. As of
March 31, 2005, the Company had approximately
$26.2 million and $4.8 million of property and
equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, located in the
United States and foreign locations, respectively. As of
December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately
$22.4 million and $2.8 million of property and
equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, located in the
United States and foreign locations, respectively. Akamai sells
its services and licenses through a direct sales force located
both domestically and abroad. For the three months ended
March 31, 2005, approximately 20% of the Companys
revenues were derived from the Companys operations outside
the United States, including 16% of total revenues derived from
Europe. For the three months ended March 31, 2004,
approximately 19% of the Companys revenues were derived
from the Companys operations outside the United States,
including 15% of total revenues derived from Europe. No single
country accounted for 10% or more of revenues derived outside
the United States during these periods. For the three months
ended March 31, 2005, no customer accounted for more than
10% of total revenues. For the three months ended March 31,
2004, one customer accounted for 11% of total revenues. No other
customers accounted for more than 10% of revenues for any other
period reported in these condensed consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
15. |
Income Taxes and Reserves |
The Companys provision for income taxes is comprised of a
current and deferred portion. The current income tax provision
is calculated as the estimated taxes payable or refundable on
tax returns for the current
11
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
year. The deferred income tax provision is calculated based on
changes in the estimated future tax effects attributable to
temporary differences and carryforwards using expected tax rates
in effect in the years during which the differences are expected
to reverse.
The Company currently has significant deferred tax assets,
resulting from net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit
carryforwards, and deductible temporary differences. The Company
provides a full valuation allowance of approximately
$361.0 million against its deferred tax assets. Management
weighs the positive and negative evidence to determine if it is
more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets
will be realized. Forming a conclusion that a valuation
allowance is not needed is difficult when there is negative
evidence such as cumulative losses in past years. Despite the
Companys profitability in the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 and during the first quarter of 2005, the
Company will continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on
its tax benefits until profitability has been sustained over an
appropriate time period and in amounts that are sufficient to
support a conclusion that it is more likely than not that all or
a portion of its deferred tax assets will be realized. A
significant decrease in the Companys valuation allowance
would result in an immediate material income tax benefit and an
increase in total assets and stockholders equity and could
have a significant impact on the Companys earnings in
future periods.
The Company has recorded certain tax reserves to address
potential exposures involving its sales and use and franchise
tax positions. These potential exposures result from the varying
application of statutes, rules, regulations and interpretations
by different jurisdictions. The Companys estimate of the
value of its tax reserves contains assumptions based on past
experiences and judgments about the interpretation of statutes,
rules and regulations by taxing jurisdictions. It is possible
that the ultimate resolution of these matters may be greater or
less than the amount that the Company estimated. During the
three months ended March 31, 2005, based upon the
resolution of its sales and use and franchise tax matters in
various jurisdictions, the Company reduced such tax reserves by
approximately $1.0 million.
|
|
16. |
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees |
|
|
|
Operating and Capital Leases |
The Company leases its facilities and certain equipment under
non-cancelable operating leases. These operating leases expire
at various dates through April 2010 and generally require the
payment of real estate taxes, insurance, maintenance and
operating costs. The Company also leases certain equipment under
capital leases, which expire at various dates through September
2005. The minimum aggregate future obligations under
non-cancelable leases as of March 31, 2005 are as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Leases | |
|
|
Operating | |
|
(Including Vendor | |
|
|
Leases | |
|
Financing) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Remaining 2005
|
|
$ |
4,760 |
|
|
$ |
99 |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
5,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
20,325 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has long-term purchase commitments for bandwidth
usage and co-location with various network and Internet service
providers. For the remainder of 2005 and for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2007, the minimum commitments are
approximately $8.4 million, $948,000 and $51,000,
respectively. The Company had an equipment purchase commitment
of approximately $500,000 as of March 31, 2005. This
purchase commitment expires in August 2005. Additionally, as of
March 31, 2005, the Company has entered into purchase
orders with various vendors for aggregate purchase commitments
of $7.3 million, which are expected to be paid during the
remainder of 2005.
Between July 2, 2001 and November 7, 2001, purported
class action lawsuits seeking monetary damages were filed in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York against the Company as well as against the underwriters of
its October 28, 1999 initial public offering of common
stock. The complaints were filed allegedly on behalf of persons
who purchased the Companys common stock during different
time periods, all beginning on October 28, 1999 and ending
on various dates. The complaints are similar and allege
violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 primarily based on the allegation that the
underwriters received undisclosed compensation in connection
with the Companys initial public offering. On
April 19, 2002, a single consolidated amended complaint was
filed, reiterating in one pleading the allegations contained in
the previously filed separate actions. The consolidated amended
complaint defines the alleged class period as October 28,
1999 through December 6, 2000. A Special Litigation
Committee of Akamais Board of Directors authorized
management to negotiate a settlement of the pending claims
substantially consistent with a Memorandum of Understanding that
was negotiated among class plaintiffs, all issuer defendants and
their insurers. The parties negotiated a settlement that is
subject to approval by the Court. On February 15, 2005, the
Court issued an Opinion and Order preliminarily approving the
settlement, provided that the defendants and plaintiffs agree to
a modification narrowing the scope of the bar order set forth in
the original settlement agreement. The Company believes that it
has meritorious defenses to the claims made in the complaint
and, if the settlement is not finalized and approved, it intends
to contest the lawsuit vigorously. An adverse resolution of the
action could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition and results of operations in
the period in which the lawsuit is resolved. The Company is not
presently able to estimate potential losses, if any, related to
this lawsuit.
In February 2002, the Company filed suit against Speedera
Networks, Inc. (Speedera) in federal court in
Massachusetts, alleging patent infringement and false
advertising by Speedera. In April 2003, the Company amended its
complaint to include an allegation that Speedera infringes a
newly-issued content delivery patent held by MIT and licensed to
Akamai. In response, Speedera filed a counterclaim in this case
alleging that Akamai has infringed a Speedera patent relating to
the combined provision of traffic management and content
delivery services. In June 2004, Speedera amended its
counterclaim to include a second patent covering a similar
service it offers. The Company believes that it has meritorious
defenses to the claims made in the counterclaim.
In June 2002, the Company filed suit against Speedera in
California Superior Court alleging theft of Akamai trade secrets
from an independent company that provides website performance
testing services. In connection with this suit, in September
2002, the Court issued a preliminary injunction to restrain
Speedera from continuing to access the Companys
confidential information from the independent companys
database and from using any data obtained from such access. In
October 2002, Speedera filed a cross-claim against the Company
seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief and alleging that
the Company engaged in various unfair trade practices, made
false and misleading statements and engaged in unfair
competition. A trial date
13
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
had been set for April 18, 2005 but, as further described
below, the litigation has been stayed. The Company believes that
it has meritorious defenses to the claims made in
Speederas cross-claim.
In November 2002, the Company filed suit against Speedera in
federal court in Massachusetts for infringement of a patent held
by Akamai. In January 2003, Speedera filed a counterclaim in
this case alleging that Akamai has infringed a patent held by
Speedera. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses
to the claims made in the counterclaim.
On March 16, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement
and plan of merger providing for the acquisition of Speedera.
Under the terms of the agreement, all litigation between the
Company and Speedera was immediately stayed. At such time as the
merger closes, all such lawsuits would be dismissed. If the
acquisition of Speedera fails to be consummated, which would
result in the resumption of litigation between the parties, the
Company intends to contest such claims vigorously; however,
there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful.
The Company is not presently able to reasonably estimate
potential losses, if any, related to these matters.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation 45, or
FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of
Indebtedness of Others. FIN 45 elaborates on the
existing disclosure requirements for most guarantees, including
loan guarantees such as standby letters of credit. FIN 45
also clarifies that at the time an entity issues a guarantee,
the entity must recognize an initial liability for the fair
value, or market value, of the obligations it assumes under the
guarantee and must disclose that information in its interim and
annual financial statements. The disclosure provisions of
FIN 45 were effective for the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The
initial recognition and initial measurement provisions of
FIN 45 apply on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or
modified after December 31, 2002. The fair value of the
Companys guarantees issued or modified during the three
months ended March 31, 2005 was determined to be immaterial.
On March 16, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement to
acquire all of the outstanding common and preferred stock,
including vested and unvested stock options, of Speedera, in
exchange for approximately 12 million shares of Akamai
common stock, valued at approximately $130 million based on
the closing price of the Akamai common stock on the NASDAQ
National Market on March 15, 2005. The acquisition is
expected to be accounted for by Akamai under the purchase method
of accounting and is expected to close during the quarter ended
June 30, 2005, subject to various regulatory approvals,
approval of Speederas stockholders and other customary
closing conditions.
14
|
|
Item 2. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
This report contains forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. These statements are subject to risks and
uncertainties and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of
our management based on information currently available to our
management. Use of words such as believes,
expects, anticipates,
intends, plans, estimates,
should, likely or similar expressions,
indicate a forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements
involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Important factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from the
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to,
those set forth under the heading Factors Affecting Future
Operating Results. We assume no obligation to update any
such forward-looking statements.
Overview
The following sets forth, as a percentage of revenues, certain
consolidated statements of operations data for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
25.1 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Amortization of other intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and operating expenses
|
|
|
72.8 |
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.8 |
) |
Other expense, net
|
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Gain on investments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
23.4 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We were profitable during 2004 and for the three months ended
March 31, 2005; however, we cannot guarantee continued
profitability for any period in the future. We have observed the
following known trends and events that are likely to have an
impact on our financial condition and results of operations in
the future:
|
|
|
|
|
During each quarter of 2004 and for the first quarter of 2005,
the dollar volume of the recurring revenue contracts that we
booked exceeded the dollar volume of the contracts we lost
through cancellations, terminations and non-payment
quarter-over-quarter. A continuation of this trend would lead to
increased revenues. |
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2005, we have continued to reduce
our network bandwidth costs per unit by entering into new
supplier contracts with lower pricing and amending existing
contracts to take advantage of price reductions offered by our
existing suppliers. However, due to increased traffic delivered
over our network, our total bandwidth costs increased during the
first quarter of 2005. We believe that our overall bandwidth
costs will continue to increase for the remainder of 2005 as a
result of expected higher traffic levels offset by continued
reductions in bandwidth costs per unit. If we do not |
15
|
|
|
|
|
experience lower per unit bandwidth pricing and we are
unsuccessful at effectively routing traffic over our network
through lower cost providers, network bandwidth costs could
exceed our expectations in 2005. |
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2005, no customer accounted for 10%
or more of our total revenues. We expect that customer
concentration levels will decline compared to those in prior
years as our customer base continues to grow. |
|
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, revenues derived
from customers outside the United States accounted for 20% of
our total revenues. We expect revenues derived from customers
outside the United States to be approximately 20% of our total
revenues in 2005. |
|
|
|
Depreciation expense related to our network equipment increased
during the first quarter of 2005 as compared to the fourth
quarter of 2004. We believe that depreciation expense related to
our network equipment will continue to increase for the
remainder of 2005 as we continue to invest in network
infrastructure equipment. We expect that the amortization of
internal-use software development costs, which we include in
cost of revenues, will continue to increase as we continue to
enhance and add functionality to our service offerings which
increases the amount of capitalized internal-use software costs. |
|
|
|
We expect that equity compensation costs will continue to
decline during the remainder of 2005, as equity awards issued in
previous years become fully vested. This decline is expected to
continue for 2005 as a result of the delay in the effective date
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment
(revised 2004). SFAS No. 123R, which is
scheduled to become effective during the first quarter of 2006,
will require us to record compensation expense for employee
stock awards at fair value. Upon adoption, we anticipate an
increase in our equity-based compensation expense which will
cause our net income to decrease significantly in the future
because we have a significant number of unvested employee
options outstanding and expect to continue to grant equity-based
compensation in the future. |
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2005, we maintained a full valuation
allowance of approximately $361.0 million against our
deferred tax assets; however, we will continue to review the
likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from
future taxable income as we expect to continue to generate
income and positive cash flows for the remainder of 2005. We
will continue to review our operating results to determine if it
becomes more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will
be realized in the future, at which time we would release a
portion, or all, of the valuation allowance. Any reduction in
our valuation allowance in the future would result in a current
income tax benefit, higher stockholders equity and could
have a significant negative impact on our earnings in future
periods as we would expect to begin recording a significant
provision for income taxes. |
|
|
|
In December 2003 and on several occasions during 2004, we
repurchased a total of $243.4 million in aggregate
principal amount of our
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes due 2007. In December 2003 and January 2004,
we issued a total of $200.0 million in principal amount of
our 1% convertible senior notes. By lowering our effective
interest rate on outstanding debt, we believe that, in the
absence of new debt, the interest expense on our debt
obligations, including deferred financing amortization and
capital lease interest expense, will not exceed
$6.5 million in 2005. |
|
|
|
In March 2005, we entered into a definitive agreement with
Speedera Networks, Inc. to acquire Speedera in a stock-for-stock
merger transaction. If the proposed acquisition is completed
during the second quarter of 2005, the impact on our results of
operations is expected to be accretive during the remainder of
2005. |
Based on our analysis of the aforementioned known trends and
events, we expect to continue to generate net income on a
quarterly basis during the remaining fiscal year of 2005;
however, our future results will be
16
affected by many factors identified below in Factors
Affecting Future Operating Results, including our ability
to:
|
|
|
|
|
increase our revenue by adding customers through long-term
contracts and limiting customer cancellations and terminations; |
|
|
|
maintain the prices we charge for our services; |
|
|
|
prevent disruptions to our services and network due to accidents
or intentional attacks; and |
|
|
|
maintain our network bandwidth costs and other operating
expenses consistent with our revenues. |
As a result, there is no assurance that we will achieve our
expected financial objectives.
Recent Events
On March 16, 2005, we entered into an agreement to acquire
all of the outstanding common and preferred stock, including
vested and unvested stock options, of Speedera by issuing
approximately 12 million shares of our common stock, valued
at approximately $130 million based on the closing stock
price of our common stock on the NASDAQ National Market on
March 15, 2005. We expect to account for the acquisition
under the purchase method of accounting. The acquisition is
expected to close during the quarter ended June 30, 2005,
subject to various regulatory approvals, approval of
Speederas stockholders and other customary closing
conditions. The merger agreement provides for a stay of all
existing litigation between Akamai and Speedera until the
closing of the merger or any earlier termination of the merger
agreement. At such time as the merger closes, all lawsuits
between the companies would be dismissed.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our managements discussion and analysis of our financial
condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared by
us in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America. The preparation of these
condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related items,
including, but not limited to, revenue recognition, accounts
receivable reserves, investments, intangible assets, income and
other taxes, depreciable lives of property and equipment,
restructuring accruals and contingent obligations. We base our
estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Actual results may differ from the amounts which
are derived from these estimates. See the section entitled
Application of Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004 for further discussion of
these critical accounting policies and estimates. There were no
material changes to our critical accounting policies and
estimates during the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
Results of Operations
Revenues. Total revenues increased 24%, or
$11.7 million, to $60.1 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $48.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase in
total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as
compared to the same period in the prior year was attributable
to an increase in service revenue of $12.1 million, offset
by a decrease in software and software-related revenue of
$419,000. The increase in service revenue was primarily
attributable to an increase in the number of customers under
recurring revenue contracts, as well as an increase in traffic
delivered and additional services sold to new and existing
customers. As of March 31, 2005, we had 1,360 customers
under recurring revenue contracts as compared to 1,172 as of
March 31, 2004. These increases resulted in a higher
average revenue per customer during the three months ended
March 31, 2005 as compared to the same period in the prior
year. The decrease in software and software-related revenues
reflects a reduction in the number of customized software
projects performed and a decrease in the number of software and
technology licenses executed.
17
For the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, 20% and
19%, respectively, of our total revenues were derived from our
operations located outside of the United States, including 16%
and 15%, respectively, derived from Europe. No single country
outside of the United States accounted for 10% or more of
revenues during these periods. Resellers accounted for 25% of
revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as
compared to 27% of revenues for the three months ended
March 31, 2004. For the three months ended March 31,
2005, no customer accounted for 10% or more of total revenues.
For the three months ended March 31, 2004, Microsoft
Corporation accounted for 11% of total revenues. No other
customer accounted for 10% or more of revenues during that
period.
Cost of Revenues. Cost of revenues includes fees paid to
network providers for bandwidth and co-location of our network
equipment. Cost of revenues also includes payroll and related
costs and equity-related compensation for network operations
personnel, cost of licenses, depreciation of network equipment
used to deliver our services and amortization of internal-use
software costs.
Cost of revenues decreased 5%, or $622,000, to
$11.5 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005 as compared to $12.1 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2004. The decrease was primarily due to a
reduction in depreciation expense of network equipment as our
network assets become fully depreciated, offset by an increase
in aggregate bandwidth costs. Traffic delivered over our network
increased significantly in the three months ended March 31,
2005 as compared to the same period in the prior year. Despite
this increase in traffic, overall bandwidth costs have continued
to increase at a lower rate because we have reduced our network
bandwidth costs per unit.
Cost of revenues during the three months ended March 31,
2005 and 2004 also included credits received of approximately
$456,000 and $155,000, respectively, as a result of settlements
and renegotiations entered into in connection with billing
disputes related to bandwidth contracts. Credits of this nature
may occur in the future as a result of our efforts to monitor
and reduce our network costs; however, the timing and amount of
these credits, if any, will vary.
Cost of revenues was comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the | |
|
|
Three Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Bandwidth, co-location and storage fees
|
|
$ |
7,412 |
|
|
$ |
6,603 |
|
Payroll and related costs of network operations personnel,
including equity compensation
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
Cost of software licenses
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
Depreciation and impairment of network equipment and
amortization of internal-use software
|
|
|
2,915 |
|
|
|
4,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
$ |
11,524 |
|
|
$ |
12,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have long-term purchase commitments for bandwidth usage and
co-location with various network and Internet service providers.
For the remainder of 2005 and for the years ending
December 31, 2006 and 2007, the current minimum commitments
are approximately $8.4 million, $948,000 and $51,000,
respectively.
We expect that cost of revenues will increase during the
remainder of 2005. We expect to deliver more traffic on our
network, which would result in higher expenses associated with
the increased traffic; however, such costs should be mitigated
by lower bandwidth costs per unit. We expect increases in
depreciation expense related to our network equipment and
amortization of internal-use software development costs, along
with payroll and related costs as we continue to make
investments in our network.
Research and Development. Research and development
expenses consist primarily of payroll and related costs and
equity-related compensation for research and development
personnel who design, develop, test and enhance our services and
our network. Research and development costs are expensed as
incurred, except certain internal-use software development costs
requiring capitalization. During the three months
18
ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we capitalized software
development costs of $2.1 million and $1.7 million,
respectively, consisting of external consulting and payroll and
payroll-related costs related to the development of internal-use
software used to deliver our services and operate our network.
These capitalized internal-use software costs are amortized to
costs of revenues over their estimated useful lives of two years.
Research and development expenses increased 35%, or $935,000, to
$3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005
as compared to $2.7 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2004. The increase in research and development
expenses was primarily due to an increase in payroll and related
costs due to an increase in headcount, offset by a slight
increase in capitalization of internal-use software development
costs. The following table quantifies the net increase in
research and development expenses for the three months ended
March 31, 2005 as compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2004 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) | |
|
|
in Research and | |
|
|
Development Expenses | |
|
|
| |
Payroll and related costs, including equity compensation
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
Capitalization of internal-use software development costs and
other
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net increase
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that research and development expenses will continue
to increase for the remainder of 2005, as we continue to
increase hiring of development personnel and make investments in
our core technology service and refinements to our other service
offerings.
Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expenses consist
primarily of payroll and related costs, equity-related
compensation and commissions for personnel engaged in marketing,
sales and service support functions, as well as advertising and
promotional expenses.
Sales and marketing expenses increased 20%, or
$2.7 million, to $16.7 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $14.0 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2004. The increase in
sales and marketing expenses was primarily due to a rise in
payroll and related costs, particularly commissions, due to
revenue growth. Additionally, during the first quarter of 2005,
marketing costs increased due to higher advertising and
promotional costs. The following table quantifies the net
increase in sales and marketing expenses for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 as compared to the three months ended
March 31, 2004 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in Sales | |
|
|
and Marketing | |
|
|
Expenses | |
|
|
| |
Payroll and related costs, including equity compensation
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
Marketing and related costs
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total increase
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that sales and marketing expenses will continue to
increase during the remainder of 2005 due to an expected
increase in commissions on higher forecasted sales, an increase
in hiring of sales personnel and additional expected increases
in marketing costs.
General and Administrative. General and administrative
expenses consist primarily of the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
depreciation of property and equipment used by Akamai internally; |
|
|
|
payroll and related costs, including equity-related compensation
and related expenses for executive, finance, business
applications, network management, human resources and other
administrative personnel; |
|
|
|
fees for professional services; |
19
|
|
|
|
|
non-income related taxes; |
|
|
|
the provision for doubtful accounts; and |
|
|
|
rent and other facility-related expenditures for leased
properties. |
During the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, we
capitalized software development costs of approximately $50,000
and $75,000, respectively, consisting of external consulting
costs and payroll and payroll-related costs related to the
development of internally-used software applications.
General and administrative expenses increased 6%, or $642,000,
to $11.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2005 as compared to $11.2 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2004. The increase in general and
administrative expenses was primarily due to an increase in
payroll and related costs as a result of headcount growth, as
well as an increase in legal, consulting and advisory services,
particularly related to litigation costs associated with trials
that had been scheduled to occur in 2005. These increases were
offset by a reduction in depreciation expense as a result of
assets becoming fully depreciated. The following table
quantifies the net reduction in general and administrative
expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004 (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) | |
|
|
in General and | |
|
|
Administrative Expenses | |
|
|
| |
Payroll and related costs, including equity compensation
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
Consulting and advisory services
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
Other expenses
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net increase
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
We expect general and administrative expenses to remain
relatively constant on a quarterly basis during the remainder of
2005. If our proposed acquisition of Speedera is not completed,
however, our litigation costs would increase which would cause
our overall general and administrative expenses to increase
compared to those of 2004.
Amortization of Other Intangible Assets. Amortization of
other intangible assets consists of amortization of assets
acquired in business combinations and amortization of acquired
license rights. Amortization of other intangible assets remained
constant at $12,000 for the each of the three months ended
March 31, 2005 and 2004. We expect to amortize
approximately $36,000 of other intangible assets related to
acquired license rights for the remainder of 2005 and $48,000 in
each year thereafter through 2008, at which time such assets
will have been fully amortized.
Interest Income. Interest income includes interest earned
on invested cash balances and marketable securities. Interest
income remained constant at $598,000 for each of the three
months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. Interest income
remained constant during each of these periods because our
invested cash and marketable securities balance levels were
relatively constant.
Interest Expense. Interest expense includes interest paid
on our debt obligations as well as amortization of deferred
financing costs. Interest expense decreased 57%, or
$2.1 million, to $1.6 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $3.8 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2004. The decrease was due
to our repurchases of a substantial portion of our outstanding
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes at various times throughout 2004, partially
offset by interest payable on our 1% convertible senior
notes issued in December 2003 and January 2004. We believe that
interest expense on our debt obligations, including deferred
financing amortization and capital lease interest expense, will
not exceed $6.5 million in 2005.
Other Expense, net. Other net expense represents net
foreign exchange losses incurred during the periods presented.
Other net expense increased 426%, or $588,000, to $726,000 for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to
$138,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The
increase was due
20
to exchange rate fluctuations. Net other (expense) income
may fluctuate in the future based upon movements in foreign
exchange rates.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. During the three
months ended March 31, 2004, we recorded a loss on early
extinguishment of debt of $2.0 million as a result of costs
incurred in connection with our repurchase of a total of
$62.9 million in principal amount of our
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes during the period. This loss of
$2.0 million consists of the reduction of $977,000 of
deferred financing costs associated with repurchases of notes
prior to their maturity, $567,000 in advisory services costs
incurred related to the repurchases and $474,000 in premiums
above par value paid to repurchase such notes. No debt
repurchases were made during the three months ended
March 31, 2005.
Provision for Income Taxes. Provision for income taxes
increased $445,000, or 530%, to $529,000 for the three months
ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $84,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2004. Provision for income taxes for
these periods relates to foreign income taxes that may fluctuate
in the future based upon changes in foreign income.
Additionally, the provision for income taxes during the three
months ended March 31, 2005 includes alternative minimum
tax expense. Despite our profitability in 2004 and for the first
quarter of 2005, as of March 31, 2005, we will continue to
maintain a full valuation allowance on our tax benefits until
profitability has been sustained over an appropriate time period
and in amounts that are sufficient to support a conclusion that
it is more likely than not that a portion or all of the deferred
tax assets will be realized. A decrease in our valuation
allowance would result in an immediate material income tax
benefit.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
To date, we have financed our operations primarily through the
following transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
private sales of capital stock; |
|
|
|
an initial public offering of our common stock in October 1999
that provided $217.6 million after underwriters
discounts and commissions; |
|
|
|
the sale in June 2000 of an aggregate of $300 million in
principal amount of our
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes, which generated net proceeds of
$290.2 million; |
|
|
|
the sale in December 2003 and January 2004 of an aggregate of
$200 million in principal amount of our 1% convertible
senior notes, which generated net proceeds of
$194.1 million; and |
|
|
|
cash generated by operations. |
As of March 31, 2005, cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities totaled $118.0 million, of which
$4.6 million is subject to restrictions limiting our
ability to withdraw or otherwise use such cash, cash equivalents
and marketable securities. See Letters of Credit
below.
Cash provided by operating activities was $18.7 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to
$8.6 million for the three months ended March 31,
2004. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was
primarily due to increased service revenue of $12.1 million
during the first quarter of 2005, as well as an increase of net
cash provided by accounts payable and accrued expenses of
$7.1 million. We expect that cash provided by operating
activities will continue to remain positive as a result of an
upward trend in cash collections related to higher revenue
billings, partially offset by an expected increase in operating
expenses that require cash outlays due to expected increases in
headcount. However, the timing and amount of future working
capital changes and our ability to manage our days sales
outstanding will affect the future amount of cash used in or
provided by operating activities.
Cash used in investing activities was $15.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2005 compared to cash provided
by investing activities of $52.3 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2004. Cash used in investing
activities for the three months ended March 31, 2005
reflects net purchases, sales and maturities of investments of
$5.3 million and capital expenditures of $9.7 million,
consisting of the capitalization of internal-use software
development costs related to our current and future service
offerings and purchase of network infrastructure equipment. Cash
provided by investing activities for the three months ended
March 31,
21
2004 was primarily from the net sale and maturity of marketable
securities of $50.3 million, offset by capital expenditures
of $3.0 million. For the three months ended March 31,
2004, cash provided by investing activities also included a
decrease of $5.0 million in restricted cash to reflect our
repurchase of $5.0 million in principal amount of our
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes in early 2004. We expect that total capital
expenditures, a component of cash used in investing activities,
will be approximately 10 to 15% of revenues in 2005.
Cash provided by financing activities was $1.5 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2005, as compared to cash
used in financing activities of $36.5 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2004. Cash provided by financing
activities during the three months ended March 31, 2005
reflects $1.6 million in proceeds received from the
issuance of common stock to employees upon exercise of stock
options offset by payments on capital lease obligations of
$134,000. Cash used in financing activities for the three months
ended March 31, 2004 reflects proceeds received from the
issuance of our 1% convertible senior notes, net of
financings costs, of $24.3 million and proceeds from
issuances of common stock to employees upon exercise of stock
options of $2.2 million. Such proceeds were offset by
payments made to repurchase $62.9 million in principal
amount of our
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes and payments on our capital lease obligations
of $131,000.
Changes in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities are
dependent upon changes in working capital items such as deferred
revenues, accounts payable, accounts receivable and various
accrued expenses, as well as changes in our capital and
financial structure due to debt repurchases and issuances, stock
option exercises, sales of equity instruments and similar events.
The following table represents the net inflows and outflows of
cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities for the periods
presented (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three | |
|
For the Three | |
|
|
Months Ended | |
|
Months Ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2005 | |
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balance as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively
|
|
$ |
108.4 |
|
|
$ |
208.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receipts from customers
|
|
|
56.5 |
|
|
|
47.0 |
|
|
Payments to vendors
|
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
Payments for employee payroll
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
Debt repurchases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62.9 |
) |
|
Debt proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
Debt interest and premium payments
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
Stock option exercises
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease)
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
(31.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balance as of
March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively
|
|
$ |
118.0 |
|
|
$ |
177.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe, based on our present business plan, that our current
cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of
$118.0 million and forecasted cash flows from operations
will be sufficient to meet our cash needs for working capital
and capital expenditures for at least the next 24 months.
If the assumptions underlying our business plan regarding future
revenue and expenses change or if unexpected opportunities or
needs arise, we may seek to raise additional cash by selling
equity or debt securities. We may seek to retire or refinance
our long-term debt with cash, equity or a combination thereof.
If additional funds are raised through the issuance of equity or
debt securities, these securities could have rights, preferences
and privileges senior to those accruing to holders of common
stock, and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions on
our operations. The sale of additional equity or convertible
debt securities could result in additional dilution to our
stockholders. See Factors Affecting Future Operating
Results.
22
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table presents our contractual obligations and
commercial commitments as of March 31, 2005 over the next
five years and thereafter (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
12-36 | |
|
36-60 | |
|
More than | |
as of March 31, 2005 |
|
Total | |
|
12 Months | |
|
Months | |
|
Months | |
|
60 Months | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes
|
|
$ |
56.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
1% convertible senior notes
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
Interest on convertible notes outstanding
|
|
|
65.8 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
Bandwidth and co-location agreements
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate operating leases
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital leases and vendor financing
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor equipment purchase obligations
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Open vendor purchase orders
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
360.0 |
|
|
$ |
28.3 |
|
|
$ |
75.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
248.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of Credit
As of March 31, 2005, we had issued $4.6 million in
irrevocable letters of credit in favor of third-party
beneficiaries, primarily related to facility leases. The letters
of credit are collateralized by restricted marketable
securities, of which $3.7 million are classified as
long-term marketable securities and $932,000 are classified as
short-term marketable securities on the condensed consolidated
balance sheet dated as of March 31, 2005. The restrictions
on these marketable securities lapse as we fulfill our
obligations or as such obligations expire as provided by the
letters of credit. These restrictions are expected to lapse
through May 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have entered into indemnification agreements with third
parties, including vendors, customers, landlords, our officers
and directors, shareholders of acquired companies, joint venture
partners and third parties to whom we license technology.
Generally, these indemnification agreements require us to
reimburse losses suffered by the third party due to various
events, such as lawsuits arising from patent or copyright
infringement or our negligence. These indemnification
obligations are considered off-balance sheet arrangements in
accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB,
Interpretation 45, or FIN 45, Guarantors
Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. See
Guarantees in the footnotes to our consolidated
financial statements included in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 for
further discussion of these indemnification agreements. The fair
value of guarantees issued or modified during the three months
ended March 31, 2005 was determined to be immaterial. As of
March 31, 2005, we do not have any additional off-balance
sheet arrangements, except for operating leases, and have not
entered into transactions with special purpose entities.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, which
is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. SFAS No. 123R requires all
share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee
stock options, to be valued at fair value on the date of grant,
and to be expensed over the applicable vesting period. Pro forma
disclosure of the income statement effects of share-based
payments is no longer an alternative. SFAS No. 123R is
effective for the first annual period beginning after
June 15, 2005. We expect to adopt this standard as of the
beginning of fiscal year 2006 under the modified prospective
transition method.
23
Under this method, a company records compensation expense for
all new awards and awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled
after the required effective date. In addition, companies must
also recognize compensation expense related to any awards that
are not fully vested as of the effective date. Compensation
expense for the unvested awards will be measured based on the
fair value of the awards previously calculated in developing the
pro forma disclosure in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 123. We are currently assessing the impact of
adopting SFAS No. 123R to our consolidated results of
operations but expect that the adoption will have a material
impact. The pro forma information included in Note 3 of our
consolidated financial statements included in this quarterly
report on Form 10-Q reflects what the impact of applying
SFAS No. 123R would have been for periods presented.
In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC,
issued Staff Accounting Bulletin, or SAB, No. 107,
Share-Based Payment. SAB No. 107 was
issued to assist preparers by providing guidance regarding the
application of SFAS No. 123R. SAB No. 107
describes the Staffs views on share-based payment
transactions with non-employees and covers key topics including
valuation models, expected volatility and expected term. We will
apply the principles of SAB No. 107 in conjunction
with our adoption of SFAS No. 123R during the first
quarter of 2006.
Factors Affecting Future Operating Results
|
|
|
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive,
and we may be unable to compete successfully against new
entrants and established companies with greater
resources. |
We compete in markets that are new, intensely competitive,
highly fragmented and rapidly changing. We have experienced and
expect to continue to experience increased competition. Many of
our current competitors, as well as a number of our potential
competitors, have longer operating histories, greater name
recognition, broader customer relationships and industry
alliances and substantially greater financial, technical and
marketing resources than we do. Other competitors may attract
customers by offering services that may be perceived as less
sophisticated versions of our services at lower prices than
those we charge. Our competitors may be able to respond more
quickly than we can to new or emerging technologies and changes
in customer requirements. Some of our current or potential
competitors may bundle their services with other services,
software or hardware in a manner that may discourage website
owners from purchasing any service we offer or Internet service
providers from installing our servers. In addition, potential
customers may decide to purchase or develop their own hardware,
software and other technology solutions rather than rely on an
external provider like Akamai. Increased competition could
result in price and revenue reductions, loss of customers and
loss of market share, which could materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
|
|
|
If the prices we charge for our services decline over
time, our business and financial results are likely to
suffer. |
Prices we have been charging for some of our services have
declined in recent years. We expect that this decline may
continue in the future as a result of, among other things,
existing and new competition in the markets we serve.
Consequently, our historical revenue rates may not be indicative
of future revenues based on comparable traffic volumes. If we
are unable to sell our services at acceptable prices relative to
our costs or if we are unsuccessful with our strategy of
additional services and features to our existing EdgeSuite
delivery customers, our revenues and gross margins will
decrease, and our business and financial results will suffer.
|
|
|
Failure to increase our revenues and keep our expenses
consistent with revenues could prevent us from maintaining
profitability. |
The year ended December 31, 2004 was the first fiscal year
during which we achieved profitability as measured in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. We have large fixed expenses, and we expect
to continue to incur significant bandwidth, sales and marketing,
product development, administrative, interest and other
expenses. Therefore, we will need to generate higher
24
revenues to maintain profitability. There are numerous factors
that could, alone or in combination with other factors, impede
our ability to increase revenues and/or moderate expenses,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
failure to increase sales of our EdgeSuite and EdgeComputing
services; |
|
|
|
significant increases in bandwidth costs or other operating
expenses; |
|
|
|
inability to maintain our prices; |
|
|
|
failure to expand the market acceptance for our services due to
continuing concerns about commercial use of the Internet,
including security, reliability, speed, cost, ease of access,
quality of service and regulatory initiatives; |
|
|
|
any failure of our current and planned services and software to
operate as expected; |
|
|
|
a failure by us to respond rapidly to technological changes in
our industry that could cause our services to become obsolete; |
|
|
|
unauthorized use or access to content delivered over our network
or network failures; |
|
|
|
continued adverse economic conditions worldwide that have
contributed to slowdowns in capital expenditures by businesses,
particularly capital spending in the information technology
market; |
|
|
|
failure of a significant number of customers to pay our fees on
a timely basis or at all or failure to continue to purchase our
services in accordance with their contractual
commitments; and |
|
|
|
inability to attract high-quality customers to purchase and
implement our current and planned services and software. |
|
|
|
If we are unable to develop new services and enhancements
to existing services, and if we fail to predict and respond to
emerging technological trends and customers changing
needs, our operating results may suffer. |
The market for our services is characterized by rapidly changing
technology, evolving industry standards and new product and
service introductions. Our operating results depend on our
ability to develop and introduce new services into existing and
emerging markets. The process of developing new technology is
complex and uncertain, and if we fail to accurately predict
customers changing needs and emerging technological
trends, our business could be harmed. We must commit significant
resources to developing new services or enhancements to our
existing services before knowing whether our investments will
result in services the market will accept. In addition, in an
effort to control expenses, our spending on research and
development decreased over the past three years. Furthermore, we
may not execute successfully our technology initiatives because
of errors in planning or timing, technical hurdles that we fail
to overcome in a timely fashion, or a lack of appropriate
resources. Failures in execution or market acceptance of new
services we introduce could result in competitors providing
those solutions before we do and loss of market share, revenues
and earnings.
|
|
|
Our substantial leverage may impair our ability to
maintain and grow operations, and any failure to meet our
repayment obligations would damage our business. |
We have long-term debt. As of March 31, 2005, our total
long-term debt was approximately $256.6 million, of which
$56.6 million is due on June 30, 2007, and our
stockholders deficit was approximately
$110.5 million. Our level of indebtedness could adversely
affect our future operations by increasing our vulnerability to
adverse changes in general economic and industry conditions and
by limiting or prohibiting our ability to obtain additional
financing for future capital expenditures, acquisitions and
general corporate and other purposes. In addition, if we are
unable to make interest or principal payments when due, we would
be in default under the terms of our loans, which would result
in all principal and interest becoming due and payable which, in
turn, would seriously harm our business.
25
|
|
|
Any unplanned interruption in our network or services
could lead to significant costs and disruptions that could
reduce our revenues and harm our business, financial results and
reputation. |
Our business is dependent on providing our customers with fast,
efficient and reliable distribution of application and content
delivery services over the Internet. For our core services, we
currently provide a standard guarantee that our networks will
deliver Internet content 24 hours a day, seven days a week,
365 days a year. If we do not meet this standard, our
customer does not pay for all or a part of its services on that
day. Our network or services could be disrupted by numerous
events, including natural disasters, failure or refusal of our
third-party network providers to provide the necessary capacity,
power losses, and intentional disruptions of our services, such
as disruptions caused by software viruses or attacks by
unauthorized users. For example, approximately four percent of
our customers experienced a brief delay in delivery of services
on June 15, 2004 as a result of a denial of service
resulting from an attack by hackers on our network. We believe
this attack targeted several well-known websites that are
customers of Akamai. Although we have taken steps to enhance our
ability to prevent the occurrence of such an incident, there can
be no assurance that attacks by unauthorized users will not be
attempted in the future, that our enhanced security measures
will be effective or that a successful attack would not be
damaging. Any widespread loss or interruption of our network or
services would reduce our revenues and could harm our business,
financial results and reputation.
|
|
|
We may have insufficient transmission capacity, which
could result in interruptions in our services and loss of
revenues. |
Our operations are dependent in part upon transmission capacity
provided by third-party telecommunications network providers. We
believe that we have access to adequate capacity to provide our
services; however, there can be no assurance that we are
adequately prepared for unexpected increases in bandwidth
demands by our customers. In addition, the bandwidth we have
contracted to purchase may become unavailable for a variety of
reasons. For example, a number of these network providers are
operating under the protection of the federal bankruptcy laws.
As a result, there is uncertainty about whether such providers,
or others that enter into bankruptcy, will be able to continue
to provide services to us. Any failure of these network
providers to provide the capacity we require, due to financial
or other reasons, may result in a reduction in, or interruption
of, service to our customers. If we do not have access to
third-party transmission capacity, we could lose customers. If
we are unable to obtain transmission capacity on terms
commercially acceptable to us or at all, our business and
financial results could suffer. In addition, our
telecommunications and network providers typically provide rack
space for our servers. Damage or destruction of, or other denial
of access to, a facility where our servers are housed could
result in a reduction in, or interruption of, service to our
customers.
|
|
|
Because our services are complex and are deployed in
complex environments, they may have errors or defects that could
seriously harm our business. |
Our services are highly complex and are designed to be deployed
in and across numerous large and complex networks. From time to
time, we have needed to correct errors and defects in our
software. In the future, there may be additional errors and
defects in our software that may adversely affect our services.
We may not have in place adequate quality assurance procedures
to ensure that we detect errors in our software in a timely
manner. If we are unable to efficiently fix errors or other
problems that may be identified, or if there are unidentified
errors that allow persons to improperly access our services, we
could experience loss of revenues and market share, damage to
our reputation, increased expenses and legal actions by our
customers.
|
|
|
Our proposed acquisition of Speedera Networks, Inc. may
fail to close or there could be substantial delays before the
merger is completed. |
On March 16, 2005, we entered into an agreement and plan of
merger providing for our acquisition of Speedera in exchange for
the issuance of approximately 12 million shares of our
common stock. Completion of the merger is subject to regulatory
approval, as well as the approval of Speederas
stockholders and other customary closing conditions. The process
of obtaining such approval could be expensive and
time-consuming. If we are unable to obtain, or are significantly
delayed in obtaining, such approvals or are otherwise unable to
complete the merger, we would have devoted substantial resources
and management attention without any
26
accompanying benefit. In such an event, our financial condition
and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
As part of our business strategy, we have entered into and
may enter into or seek to enter into business combinations and
acquisitions that may be difficult to integrate, disrupt our
business, dilute stockholder value or divert management
attention. |
We have made acquisitions of other companies in the past and may
enter into business combinations and acquisitions in addition to
the proposed Speedera acquisition in the future. Acquisitions
are typically accompanied by a number of risks, including the
difficulty of integrating the operations and personnel of the
acquired companies, the potential disruption of our ongoing
business, the potential distraction of management, expenses
related to the acquisition and potential unknown liabilities
associated with acquired businesses. We face all of these risks
in connection with the proposed Speedera acquisition. If we are
not successful in completing acquisitions that we may pursue in
the future, we may be required to reevaluate our business
strategy, and we may incur substantial expenses and devote
significant management time and resources without a productive
result. In addition, with future acquisitions, we could use
substantial portions of our available cash or, as in the
proposed Speedera merger transaction, make dilutive issuances of
securities. Future acquisitions or attempted acquisitions could
also have an adverse effect on our ability to remain profitable.
|
|
|
If the estimates we make, and the assumptions on which we
rely, in preparing our financial statements prove inaccurate,
our actual results may be adversely affected. |
Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. The preparation of these financial statements requires
us to make estimates and judgments about, among other things,
taxes, revenue recognition, capitalization of internal-use
software, contingent obligations, doubtful accounts and
restructuring charges, among other things. These estimates and
judgments affect the reported amounts of our assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, the amounts of charges
accrued by us, such as those made in connection with our
restructuring charges, and related disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to
be reasonable under the circumstances. If our estimates or the
assumptions underlying them are not correct, we may need to
accrue additional charges that could adversely affect our
results of operations, which in turn could adversely affect our
stock price.
|
|
|
If our license agreement with MIT terminates, our business
could be adversely affected. |
We have licensed technology from MIT covered by various patents,
patent applications and copyrights relating to Internet content
delivery technology. Some of our core technology is based in
part on the technology covered by these patents, patent
applications and copyrights. Our license is effective for the
life of the patents and patent applications; however, under
limited circumstances, such as a cessation of our operations due
to our insolvency or our material breach of the terms of the
license agreement, MIT has the right to terminate our license. A
termination of our license agreement with MIT could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
|
|
|
We have incurred and could continue to incur substantial
costs defending our intellectual property from infringement
claims. |
Other companies or individuals, including our competitors, may
obtain patents or other proprietary rights that would prevent,
limit or interfere with our ability to make, use or sell our
services. Companies providing Internet-related products and
services are increasingly bringing suits alleging infringement
of their proprietary rights, particularly patent rights. We have
been named as a defendant in several lawsuits alleging that we
have violated other companies intellectual property
rights. Any litigation or claims, whether or not valid, could
result in substantial costs and diversion of resources and
require us to do one or more of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
cease selling, incorporating or using products or services that
incorporate the challenged intellectual property; |
27
|
|
|
|
|
pay substantial damages; |
|
|
|
obtain a license from the holder of the infringed intellectual
property right, which license may not be available on reasonable
terms or at all; and |
|
|
|
redesign products or services. |
If we are forced to take any of these actions, our business may
be seriously harmed. If we are found to infringe the proprietary
rights of others. In the event of a successful claim of
infringement against us and our failure or inability to obtain a
license to the infringed technology, our business and operating
results could be materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
Our business will be adversely affected if we are unable
to protect our intellectual property rights from third-party
challenges. |
We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and
trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our
intellectual property rights. We have brought numerous lawsuits
against entities that we believe are infringing on our
intellectual property rights. These legal protections afford
only limited protection. Monitoring unauthorized use of our
services is difficult and we cannot be certain that the steps we
have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology,
particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect
our proprietary rights as fully as in the United States.
Although we have licensed from other parties proprietary
technology covered by patents, we cannot be certain that any
such patents will not be challenged, invalidated or
circumvented. Furthermore, we cannot be certain that any pending
or future patent applications will be granted, that any future
patent will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, or
that rights granted under any patent that may be issued will
provide competitive advantages to us.
|
|
|
If we are unable to retain our key employees and hire
qualified sales and technical personnel, our ability to compete
could be harmed. |
Our future success depends upon the continued services of our
executive officers and other key technology, sales, marketing
and support personnel who have critical industry experience and
relationships that they rely on in implementing our business
plan. None of our officers or key employees is bound by an
employment agreement for any specific term. We have a key
person life insurance policy covering only the life of F.
Thomson Leighton, our Chief Scientist and a member of our Board
of Directors. The loss of the services of any of our key
employees could delay the development and introduction of and
negatively impact our ability to sell our services.
|
|
|
We face risks associated with international operations
that could harm our business. |
We have operations in several foreign countries and may continue
to expand our sales and support organizations internationally.
Such expansion could require us to make significant
expenditures. We are increasingly subject to a number of risks
associated with international business activities that may
increase our costs, lengthen our sales cycle and require
significant management attention. These risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
lack of market acceptance of our software and services abroad; |
|
|
|
increased expenses associated with marketing services in foreign
countries; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions in international markets; |
|
|
|
currency exchange rate fluctuations; |
|
|
|
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements resulting in
unanticipated costs and delays; |
|
|
|
interpretations of laws or regulations that would subject us to
regulatory supervision or, in the alternative, require us to
exit a country which could have a negative impact on the quality
of our services or our results of operations; |
|
|
|
tariffs, export controls and other trade barriers; |
28
|
|
|
|
|
longer accounts receivable payment cycles and difficulties in
collecting accounts receivable; and |
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences. |
|
|
|
If we are required to seek additional funding, such
funding may not be available on acceptable terms or at
all. |
If our revenues decrease or grow more slowly than we anticipate
or if our operating expenses increase more than we expect or
cannot be reduced in the event of lower revenues, we may need to
obtain funding from outside sources. If we are unable to obtain
this funding, our business would be materially and adversely
affected. In addition, even if we were to find outside funding
sources, we might be required to issue securities with greater
rights than the securities we have outstanding today. We might
also be required to take other actions that could lessen the
value of our common stock, including borrowing money on terms
that are not favorable to us, if at all.
|
|
|
Internet-related and other laws could adversely affect our
business. |
Laws and regulations that apply to communications and commerce
over the Internet are becoming more prevalent. In particular,
the growth and development of the market for online commerce has
prompted calls for more stringent tax, consumer protection and
privacy laws, both in the United States and abroad, that may
impose additional burdens on companies conducting business
online. This could negatively affect the businesses of our
customers and reduce their demand for our services. Tax laws
that might apply to our servers, which are located in many
different jurisdictions, could require us to pay additional
taxes that would adversely affect our continued profitability.
Internet-related laws, however, remain largely unsettled, even
in areas where there has been some legislative action. The
adoption or modification of laws or regulations relating to the
Internet or our operations, or interpretations of existing law,
could adversely affect our business.
|
|
|
Provisions of our charter documents, our stockholder
rights plan and Delaware law may have anti-takeover effects that
could prevent a change in control even if the change in control
would be beneficial to our stockholders. |
Provisions of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation, amended and restated by-laws and Delaware law
could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us,
even if doing so would be beneficial to our stockholders. In
addition, our Board of Directors has adopted a shareholder
rights plan the provisions of which could make it more difficult
for a potential acquirer of Akamai to consummate an acquisition
transaction without the approval of our Board of Directors.
|
|
|
A class action lawsuit has been filed against us that may
be costly to defend and the outcome of which is uncertain and
may harm our business. |
We are named as a defendant in a purported class action lawsuit
filed in 2001 alleging that the underwriters of our initial
public offering received undisclosed compensation in connection
with our initial public offering of common stock in violation of
the Securities Act and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, which we refer to as the Exchange Act. Any conclusion
of these matters in a manner adverse to us could have a material
adverse affect on our financial position and results of
operations.
|
|
|
We may become involved in other litigation that may
adversely affect us. |
In the ordinary course of business, we may become involved in
litigation, administrative proceedings and governmental
proceedings. Such matters can be time-consuming, divert
managements attention and resources and cause us to incur
significant expenses. Furthermore, there can be no assurance
that the results of any of these actions will not have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
or financial condition.
29
|
|
Item 3. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates
relates primarily to our debt and investment portfolio. In our
investment portfolio we do not use derivative financial
instruments. We place our investments with high quality issuers
and, by policy, limit the amount of risk by investing primarily
in money market funds, United States Treasury obligations,
high-quality corporate obligations and certificates of deposit.
We may incur realized losses as a result of early redemptions of
our debt securities. Our
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes and 1% convertible senior notes are
subject to changes in market value. Under certain conditions,
the holders of our 1% convertible senior notes may require
us to redeem the notes on or after December 15, 2010. As of
March 31, 2005, the carrying amount and fair value of the
51/2% convertible
subordinated notes were $56.6 million and
$57.6 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2005, the
carrying amount and fair value of the 1% convertible senior
notes were $200.0 million and $200.5 million,
respectively.
We have operations in Europe and Asia. As a result, we are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. Additionally,
we may continue to expand our operations globally and sell to
customers in foreign locations, which may increase our exposure
to foreign exchange fluctuations.
|
|
Item 4. |
Controls and Procedures |
|
|
(a) |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures |
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2005.
The term disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange
Act, means controls and procedures of a company that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
a company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported,
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and
forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without
limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated
and communicated to the companys management, including its
principal executive and principal financial officers, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can
provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives,
and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating
the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and
procedures. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls
and procedures as of March 31, 2005, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of such
date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at
the reasonable assurance level.
|
|
(b) |
Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting |
No changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange
Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
30
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1. |
Legal Proceedings |
See Item 3 of part I of our annual report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 for a discussion of
legal proceedings as to which there were no material
developments during the quarter ended March 31, 2005.
The exhibits filed as part of this quarterly report on
Form 10-Q are listed in the exhibit index immediately
preceding the exhibits and are incorporated herein.
31
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
Akamai Technologies, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Cobuzzi, |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: May 10, 2005
32
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 10 |
.29* |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated March 16, 2005, by and
among the Registrant, Speedera Networks, Inc., Aquarius
Acquisition Corp. and the Representative of the Equity Holders |
|
|
Exhibit 31 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/ Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended |
|
|
Exhibit 31 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/ Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended |
|
|
Exhibit 32 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
Exhibit 32 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
* |
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on
March 18, 2005. The Schedules (and similar attachments) to
the Agreement and Plan of Merger were omitted from this filing
pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The
Registrant will furnish copies of any Schedules and similar
attachments to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
upon request. |
33