Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004. |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to . |
Commission File Number 000-51194
Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts |
|
04-3336598 |
(State of incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
P.O. Box 309
58 Main Street
Franklin, Massachusetts 02038-0309
(508) 528-7000
(Address and telephone number of principal executive
offices)
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE
ACT:
None
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE
ACT:
Common Stock, no par value
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes o No þ.
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes o No þ.
The registrant had not issued any shares of capital stock as of
June 30, 2004, the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
As of March 25, 2005, we had no outstanding shares of
common stock.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I
General
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp was organized in 1996 as a mutual
holding company in connection with Benjamin Franklin Banks
reorganization into the mutual holding company form of
organization. Benjamin Franklin Bancorp is registered with the
Federal Reserve Board as a bank holding company under the Bank
Holding Company Act. Since the formation of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp, it has owned 100% of Benjamin Franklin Banks
outstanding capital stock and will continue to do so after the
completion of the pending conversion from mutual to stock form,
as described below. At December 31, 2004, Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp had total assets of $517.4 million and total
deposits of $396.5 million.
Benjamin Franklin Bank is a full-service, community-oriented
financial institution offering products and services to
individuals, families and businesses through six offices located
in Norfolk and Worcester counties in Massachusetts. Benjamin
Franklin Bank was originally organized as a Massachusetts
state-charted mutual savings bank in 1871. In 1996, it became a
Massachusetts-chartered savings bank in stock form upon the
formation of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp as its mutual holding
company.
Benjamin Franklin Banks business consists primarily of
making loans to its customers, including residential mortgages,
commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial
business loans and consumer loans, and investing in a variety of
investment and mortgage-backed securities. Benjamin Franklin
Bank funds these lending and investment activities with deposits
from the general public, funds generated from operations and
selected borrowings.
Our principal website is www.benfranklinbank.com. We will
make our annual, quarterly and current reports, and amendments
to those reports, available free of charge on
www.benfranklinbank.com, as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file such material with, or
furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. Reports
of beneficial ownership of our common stock, and changes in that
ownership, by directors and officers on Forms 3, 4 and 5
will likewise be available free of charge on our website. The
information on our website is not incorporated by reference in
this annual report on Form 10-K or in any other report,
schedule, notice or registration statement filed with or
submitted to the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that
contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other
information regarding issuers that file electronically at
www.sec.gov. You may also read and copy the materials we
file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference Room at
450 Fifth Street, NW., Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
Chart Bank Acquisition
On September 1, 2004, we entered into an agreement to
acquire Chart Bank, which operates through two offices in
Waltham and one office in Newton, Massachusetts. At
December 31, 2004, Chart Bank had total assets of
$258.5 million and total deposits of $208.7 million.
Pursuant to our merger agreement with Chart Bank, dated
September 1, 2004, Chart Bank will merge into and become a
part of our subsidiary bank, Benjamin Franklin Bank, immediately
following completion of the mutual-to-stock conversion.
The acquisition will enable us to expand our branch network into
Middlesex County, Massachusetts, where Chart Bank maintains two
offices in Waltham and one office in Newton. In addition to
expanding our geographic branching outreach, this acquisition
will enable us to leverage our capital base and is expected to
improve operating efficiency through increased scale.
In our merger agreement with Chart Bank, we agreed that the
Chart Bank stockholders may elect to receive either $30.75 in
cash or 3.075 shares of our common stock for each share of
Chart Bank stock held by them, with 45.0% of the aggregate
consideration to be paid in cash and 55.0% of the aggregate
consideration to be paid in common stock. The aggregate
consideration for the Chart Bank acquisition will be $21,477,250
in cash and 2,503,050 shares of our common stock, assuming
that the 77,000 Chart Bank
2
options outstanding as of March 25, 2005 are cashed out at
the closing rather than being exercised by optionees prior to
the closing. At December 31, 2004, 137,000 Chart Bank
options were outstanding, 60,000 of which had been exercised as
of March 25, 2005.
The Mutual-to-Stock Conversion
To provide us with the capital and the form of consideration
necessary to acquire Chart Bank, we are in the process of
converting from the mutual form (meaning no stockholders) to the
stock form (100% owned by public stockholders if the conversion
and related public offering are successful) and raising
additional capital through such a stock offering. Other reasons
for the conversion include:
|
|
|
|
|
to support internal growth through lending in the communities we
serve; |
|
|
|
to enhance existing products and services and support the
development of new products and services; |
|
|
|
to facilitate growth through de novo branching; |
|
|
|
to facilitate growth through branch and whole bank acquisitions
as opportunities arise; and |
|
|
|
to improve our overall competitive position. |
As a stock holding company, we will have greater flexibility in
structuring further mergers and acquisitions, including the form
of consideration that we can use to pay for an acquisition. Our
current mutual holding company structure precludes us from
offering shares of common stock as consideration in a merger or
acquisition. Potential sellers often want stock for at least
part of the purchase price, because the exchange of stock
provides the opportunity to enjoy future investment growth and
to defer the recognition of capital gains. Our new stock holding
company structure will enable us to offer stock or cash
consideration, or a combination thereof and will, therefore,
enhance our ability to compete with other bidders when
acquisition opportunities arise. Other than our agreement to
acquire Chart Bank, we currently have no arrangements or
understandings regarding any specific acquisition.
Market Area and Competition
We offer a variety of financial products and services designed
to meet the needs of the communities we serve. Our primary
deposit-gathering area is concentrated southwest of Boston in
the communities in which our six banking offices are
located specifically in the towns of Franklin,
Foxboro, Bellingham, Milford, and Medfield and in
contiguous communities in Norfolk and Worcester Counties. Our
lending area is broader than our deposit-gathering area and
includes all of Massachusetts and northern Rhode Island,
although most of our loans are made to customers located in our
primary deposit-gathering market area.
We are headquartered in Franklin, Massachusetts, located
41 miles southwest of Boston. Five of the six Benjamin
Franklin Bank offices are located in Norfolk County, while one
office is located just across the county border in the town of
Milford, in Worcester County. The counties in which Benjamin
Franklin Bank currently operates include a mixture of rural,
suburban and urban markets. The economies of these areas were
historically based on manufacturing, but similar to many areas
of the country, have now evolved into more service-oriented
economies with employment in most large economic sectors
including wholesale/retail trade, service, manufacturing,
finance, real estate and government. A large portion of Norfolk
County residents work in other nearby areas, including the City
of Boston and the greater Boston area. There is also significant
employment located along the I-495 corridor, which runs directly
through Benjamin Franklin Banks Norfolk County market area.
According to published statistics, Norfolk Countys
population has grown by 0.3% since the year 2000 to a total of
657,000 in 2004. Per capita income for the county has grown by
4.0% since 2000 to $38,037, 27.5% higher than that of
Massachusetts and 57.9% higher than the U.S. as a whole.
Median household income for Norfolk County was $72,764, 27.6%
higher than for the state and 56.6% higher than the
3
U.S. average. The unemployment rate for the county stood at
4.5% as of August 2004, lower than the state average of 4.6% and
the U.S. average of 5.4%.
We face substantial competition in our efforts to originate
loans and attract deposits and other fee-based business. We face
direct competition from a significant number of financial
institutions, many with a state-wide, regional or national
presence. Many of these financial institutions are significantly
larger and have greater financial resources than Benjamin
Franklin Bank.
Lending Activities
General. Benjamin Franklin Banks gross loan
portfolio aggregated $383.4 million at December 31,
2004, representing 74.1% of total assets at that date. In its
lending activities, Benjamin Franklin Bank originates
residential real estate loans secured by one-to-four-family
residences, commercial real estate loans, residential and
commercial construction loans, commercial loans, home equity
lines-of-credit, fixed rate home equity loans, and other
personal consumer loans. While Benjamin Franklin Bank makes
loans throughout Massachusetts and northern Rhode Island, most
of its lending activities are concentrated in its market area.
Loans originated totaled $246.9 million in 2003 and
$207.6 million in 2004. Residential mortgage loans sold in
the secondary market, on a servicing-retained basis, totaled
$97.2 million and $31.3 million during those same
periods.
Loans originated by Benjamin Franklin Bank are subject to
federal and state laws and regulations. Interest rates charged
by Benjamin Franklin Bank on its loans are influenced by the
demand for such loans, the amount and cost of funding available
for lending purposes, current asset/liability management
objectives and the interest rates offered by competitors.
4
The following table summarizes the composition of Benjamin
Franklin Banks loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
Amount | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
241,090 |
|
|
|
62.56% |
|
|
$ |
172,123 |
|
|
|
59.22% |
|
|
$ |
165,007 |
|
|
|
62.58% |
|
|
$ |
172,959 |
|
|
|
66.99% |
|
|
$ |
206,918 |
|
|
|
72.69% |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
85,911 |
|
|
|
22.29% |
|
|
|
68,652 |
|
|
|
23.62% |
|
|
|
51,357 |
|
|
|
19.48% |
|
|
|
45,532 |
|
|
|
17.64% |
|
|
|
44,456 |
|
|
|
15.62% |
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
28,651 |
|
|
|
7.43% |
|
|
|
23,936 |
|
|
|
8.23% |
|
|
|
21,082 |
|
|
|
8.00% |
|
|
|
19,106 |
|
|
|
7.40% |
|
|
|
13,117 |
|
|
|
4.61% |
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
23,199 |
|
|
|
6.02% |
|
|
|
18,171 |
|
|
|
6.25% |
|
|
|
16,507 |
|
|
|
6.26% |
|
|
|
11,161 |
|
|
|
4.32% |
|
|
|
9,778 |
|
|
|
3.44% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378,851 |
|
|
|
98.30% |
|
|
|
282,882 |
|
|
|
97.32% |
|
|
|
253,953 |
|
|
|
96.32% |
|
|
|
248,758 |
|
|
|
96.35% |
|
|
|
274,269 |
|
|
|
96.36% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
1.14% |
|
|
|
5,559 |
|
|
|
1.92% |
|
|
|
6,552 |
|
|
|
2.48% |
|
|
|
5,512 |
|
|
|
2.14% |
|
|
|
5,951 |
|
|
|
2.09% |
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
0.56% |
|
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
0.76% |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
1.20% |
|
|
|
3,899 |
|
|
|
1.51% |
|
|
|
4,417 |
|
|
|
1.55% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,545 |
|
|
|
1.70% |
|
|
|
7,778 |
|
|
|
2.68% |
|
|
|
9,709 |
|
|
|
3.68% |
|
|
|
9,411 |
|
|
|
3.65% |
|
|
|
10,368 |
|
|
|
3.64% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
385,396 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
290,660 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
263,662 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
258,169 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
284,637 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred loan origination costs
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(3,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,312 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,068 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
$ |
383,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
288,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
261,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
257,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
284,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
Residential Real Estate Loans. Benjamin Franklin Bank
offers fixed-rate and adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans
with maturities of up to 30 years and maximum loan amounts
generally of up to $1.5 million. As of December 31,
2004, this portfolio totaled $241.1 million, or 62.6% of
the total gross loan portfolio on that date, and had an average
yield of 4.61%. Of the residential mortgage loans outstanding on
that date, 61.3% were adjustable-rate loans with an average
yield of 4.19% and 38.7% were fixed-rate mortgage loans with an
average yield of 5.28%. Residential mortgage loans originations
totaled $183.3 million and $116.9 million for 2003 and
2004, respectively.
The decision to originate loans for portfolio or for sale in the
secondary market is made by the Banks Asset/ Liability
Management Committee, and is based on the organizations
interest rate risk profile. Current practice is to sell almost
all newly originated fixed-rate 15 and 30 year monthly
payment loans. At December 31, 2004, 15 and 30 year
fixed rate monthly payment loans held in portfolio totaled
$10.0 million, or 4.1% of total residential real estate
mortgage loans at that date. Benjamin Franklin Bank originates
most such loans under forward sale commitments to Freddie Mac
and Fannie Mae. Benjamin Franklin Bank continues to service
loans sold to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae and earns a fee equal
to 0.25% of the loan amounts outstanding for providing these
services. The total of loans serviced for others as of
December 31, 2004 is $130.6 million.
Benjamin Franklin Bank also offers fixed-rate bi-weekly
residential mortgage loans with maturities generally ranging
between 10 and 30 years. Generally, Benjamin Franklin
retains in its portfolio bi-weekly loans with terms of
15 years or less and sells those with terms greater than
15 years in the secondary market, with servicing rights
retained. As of December 31, 2004, bi-weekly residential
mortgage loans held in portfolio totaled $83.3 million, or
34.6% of total residential mortgage loans on that date.
The adjustable-rate mortgage (ARM) loans offered by
Benjamin Franklin Bank make up the largest portion of the
residential mortgage loans held in portfolio. At
December 31, 2004, ARM loans totaled $147.8 million or
61.3% of total residential loans outstanding at that date. ARMs
are offered for terms of up to 30 years with initial
interest rates that are fixed for 1, 3 or 5 years.
After the initial fixed-rate period, the interest rates on the
loans are reset based on the relevant U.S. Treasury CMT
(Constant Maturity Treasury) Index plus add-on margins of
varying amounts, for periods of 1, 3 or 5 years.
Interest rate adjustments on such loans are typically limited to
no more than 2.0% during any adjustment period and 6.0% over the
life of the loan. This feature of ARM loans that allows for
periodic adjustments in the interest rate charged helps to
reduce Benjamin Franklin Banks exposure to changes in
interest rates. However, ARM loans may possess an element of
credit risk not inherent in fixed-rate mortgage loans, in that
borrowers are potentially exposed to increases in debt service
requirements over the life of the loan in the event market
interest rates rise. Higher payments may increase the risk of
default, though this risk has not had a material adverse effect
on Benjamin Franklin Bank to date.
In its residential mortgage loan originations, Benjamin Franklin
Bank lends up to a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 95.0% on
mortgage loans secured by owner-occupied property, with the
condition that private mortgage insurance is required for loans
with a loan-to-value ratio in excess of 80.0%. Title insurance,
hazard insurance and, if appropriate, flood insurance are
required for all properties securing real estate loans made by
the Bank. A licensed appraiser appraises all properties securing
residential first mortgage loans.
In an effort to provide financing for low and moderate-income
first-time home buyers, Benjamin Franklin Bank originates and
services residential mortgage loans with private mortgage
insurance provided by the Mortgage Insurance Fund (MIF) of
the Massachusetts Housing Finance Agency, or MassHousing. The
program provides mortgage payment protection as an enhancement
to mortgage insurance coverage. This no-cost benefit, known as
MI Plus, provides up to six monthly principal and
interest payments in the event of a borrowers job loss.
Commercial Real Estate Loans. Benjamin Franklin Bank
originated $27.1 million and $26.2 million of
commercial real estate loans in 2003 and 2004, respectively, and
had $85.9 million of commercial real estate loans, with an
average yield of 5.69%, in its portfolio as of December 31,
2004. We have placed increasing emphasis on commercial real
estate lending over the past several years, and as a result such
6
loans have grown from 15.6% of the total loan portfolio at
December 31, 2000 to 22.3% as of December 31, 2004.
Benjamin Franklin Bank intends to further grow this segment of
its loan portfolio, both in absolute terms and as a percentage
of its total loan portfolio. Management of Benjamin Franklin
Bank believes that there exist additional profitable commercial
real estate lending opportunities in its market area and that of
Chart Bank. Further, management believes that there exists an
opportunity to leverage the considerable resources already
invested by both institutions in commercial real estate lending
operations to tap the potential of these markets.
Benjamin Franklin Bank generally originates commercial real
estate loans for terms of up to 25 years, typically with
interest rates that adjust over periods of one to seven years
based on various rate indices. Commercial real estate loans are
generally secured by multi-family income properties, small
office buildings, retail facilities, warehouses, industrial
properties and owner-occupied properties used for business.
Generally, commercial real estate loans do not exceed 80.0% of
the appraised value of the underlying collateral.
In its evaluation of a commercial real estate loan application,
Benjamin Franklin Bank considers the net operating income of the
borrowers business, the borrowers expertise, credit
history, and the profitability and value of the underlying
property. In addition, for loans secured by rental properties,
Benjamin Franklin Bank will also consider the terms of the
leases and the quality of the tenants. Benjamin Franklin Bank
generally requires that the properties securing these loans have
debt service coverage ratios (the ratio of cash flow before debt
service to debt service) of at least 1.20x. Benjamin Franklin
Bank generally requires the borrowers seeking commercial real
estate loans to personally guarantee those loans.
Commercial real estate loans generally have larger balances and
involve a greater degree of risk than residential mortgage
loans. Loan repayment is often dependent on the successful
operation and management of the properties, as well as on the
collateral value of the commercial real estate securing the
loan. Economic events and changes in government regulations
could have an adverse impact on the cash flows generated by
properties securing Benjamin Franklin Banks commercial
real estate loans and on the value of such properties. See
Risk Factors Our Commercial Real Estate,
Construction and Commercial Business Loans May Expose Us To
Increased Credit Risks.
Construction Loans. Benjamin Franklin Bank originates
land acquisition, development and construction loans to builders
and developers, as well as loans to individuals to finance the
construction of residential dwellings for personal use. Benjamin
Franklin Bank originated $16.2 million and
$43.7 million in construction loans during 2003 and 2004,
respectively, and as of December 31, 2004 had
$28.7 million in construction loans in its portfolio,
representing 7.4% of such portfolio, with an average yield of
6.19%.
Acquisition loans help finance the purchase of land intended for
further development, including single family houses and
condominiums, multi-family houses and commercial income
property. In some cases, Benjamin Franklin Bank makes an
acquisition loan before the borrower has received approval to
develop the land as planned. In general, the maximum
loan-to-value ratio for a land acquisition loan is 75.0% of the
lower of the cost or appraised value of the property. Benjamin
Franklin Bank also makes development loans to builders in its
market area to finance improvements to real estate, consisting
mostly of single-family subdivisions, typically to finance the
cost of utilities, roads, waste treatment and other costs.
Builders typically rely on the sale of single-family homes to
repay development loans, although in some cases the improved
building lots may be sold to another builder. The maximum amount
loaned is generally limited to the cost of the improvements, not
to exceed 80.0% of the appraised value, as completed. Advances
are made in accordance with a schedule reflecting the cost of
the improvements.
Benjamin Franklin Bank also grants construction loans to area
builders, often in conjunction with the development loans. In
the case of residential subdivisions, these loans finance the
cost of completing homes on the improved property. Advances on
construction loans are made in accordance with a schedule
reflecting the cost of construction. The maximum amount of the
loan is generally limited to the lower of 80.0% of the appraised
value of the property, as completed, or the propertys cost
of construction. For construction loans on residential units
being constructed without a pre-sale agreement, the loan amount
is limited to 75.0% of the appraised value of the property, as
completed. Repayment of construction loans on
7
residential subdivisions is normally expected from the sale of
units to individual purchasers. In the case of income-producing
property, repayment is usually expected from permanent financing
upon completion of construction. Benjamin Franklin Bank commits
to provide the permanent mortgage financing on most of its
construction loans on income-producing property.
For owner-occupied, one-to-four family properties, Benjamin
Franklin Bank will lend up to 95.0% of the lesser of appraised
value upon completion of construction or the cost of
construction, provided that private mortgage insurance coverage
is obtained for any loan with a loan-to-value or loan-to-cost in
excess of 80.0%.
Land acquisition, development and construction lending exposes
Benjamin Franklin Bank to greater credit risk than residential
mortgage lending to owner occupants. The repayment of these
loans depends on the sale of the property to third parties or
the availability of permanent financing upon completion of all
improvements, and on the business and financial condition of the
borrowers. In the event Benjamin Franklin Bank makes an
acquisition loan on property that is not yet approved for the
planned development, there is the risk that approvals will not
be granted or will be delayed. Development and construction
loans also expose Benjamin Franklin Bank to the risk that
improvements will not be completed on time in accordance with
specifications and projected costs. In addition, the ultimate
sale or rental of the property may not occur as anticipated.
These events, as well as economic events and changes in
government regulations could have an adverse impact on the value
of properties securing construction loans and on the
borrowers ability to repay. See Risk
Factors Our Commercial Real Estate, Construction and
Commercial Business Loans May Expose Us To Increased Credit
Risks.
Home Equity Lines-of-Credit and Loans. Benjamin Franklin
Bank offers home equity lines-of-credit and home equity term
loans. Benjamin Franklin Bank originated $17.1 million and
$15.9 million of home equity lines-of-credit and loans
during 2003 and 2004, respectively, and at December 31,
2004 had $23.2 million of home equity lines-of-credit and
loans outstanding, representing 6.0% of the loan portfolio, with
an average yield of 5.32% at that date.
Home equity lines-of-credit and loans are secured by second
mortgages on one-to-four family owner occupied properties, and
are made in amounts such that the combined first and second
mortgage balances do not exceed 80.0% of the value of the
property serving as collateral. The lines-of-credit are
available to be drawn upon for 10 years, at the end of
which time they become term loans amortized over 10 years.
Interest rates on home equity lines normally adjust based on
Benjamin Franklin Banks prime rate of interest. The
undrawn portion of home equity lines-of-credit total
$28.3 million at December 31, 2004.
Commercial Business Loans. Benjamin Franklin Bank
originates secured and unsecured commercial business loans to
business customers in its market area for the purpose of
financing equipment purchases, working capital, expansion and
other general business purposes. Benjamin Franklin Bank
originated $1.6 million and $3.3 million in commercial
business loans during 2003 and 2004, respectively, and as of
December 31, 2004 had $4.4 million in commercial
business loans in its portfolio, representing 1.1% of such
portfolio, with an average yield of 6.98%. Benjamin Franklin
Bank intends to grow this segment of its lending business in the
future.
Benjamin Franklin Banks commercial business loans are
generally collateralized by equipment, accounts receivable and
inventory, supported by personal guarantees. Benjamin Franklin
Bank offers both term and revolving commercial loans. The former
have either fixed or adjustable-rates of interest and generally
fully amortize over a term of between three and seven years.
Revolving loans are written for a one year term, renewable
annually, with floating interest rates that are indexed to
Benjamin Franklin Banks prime rate of interest.
When making commercial business loans, Benjamin Franklin Bank
considers the financial statements of the borrower, the
borrowers payment history with respect to both corporate
and personal debt, the debt service capabilities of the
borrower, the projected cash flows of the business, the
viability of the industry in which the borrower operates and the
value of the collateral. Benjamin Franklin Banks
commercial business loans are not concentrated in any one
industry.
8
Commercial business loans generally bear higher interest rates
than residential mortgage loans of like duration because they
involve a higher risk of default since their repayment is
generally dependent on the successful operation of the
borrowers business and the sufficiency of collateral, if
any. Because commercial business loans often depend on the
successful operation or management of the business, repayment of
such loans may be affected by adverse changes in the economy.
Further, collateral securing such loans may depreciate in value
over time, may be difficult to appraise and to liquidate, and
may fluctuate in value. See Risk Factors Our
Commercial Real Estate, Construction and Commercial Business
Loans May Expose Us To Increased Credit Risks.
Consumer and Other Loans. Benjamin Franklin Bank offers a
variety of consumer and other loans, including auto loans and
loans secured by passbook savings or certificate accounts.
Benjamin Franklin Bank originated $1.6 million and
$1.7 million of consumer and other loans during 2003 and
2004, respectively, and at December 31, 2004 had
$2.2 million of consumer and other loans outstanding,
representing 0.6% of the loan portfolio at that date, with an
average yield of 7.12%.
Loan Origination and Underwriting. Loan originations come
from a variety of sources. The primary source of originations
are our salaried and commissioned loan personnel, and to a
lesser extent, local mortgage brokers, advertising and referrals
from customers. From time to time Benjamin Franklin Bank
purchases adjustable-rate residential mortgages from mortgage
correspondents in the greater Boston area with whom the Bank has
established relationships. Benjamin Franklin Bank also
occasionally purchases participation interests in commercial
real estate loans from banks located in the Boston area.
Benjamin Franklin Bank underwrites such residential and
commercial purchased loans using its own underwriting criteria.
Benjamin Franklin Bank issues loan commitments to prospective
borrowers conditioned on the occurrence of certain events.
Commitments are made in writing on specified terms and
conditions and are generally honored for up to 60 days from
approval. At December 31, 2004, Benjamin Franklin Bank had
loan commitments and unadvanced loans and lines-of-credit
totaling $70.6 million. For information about Benjamin
Franklin Banks loan commitments outstanding as of
December 31, 2004, see Item 7A
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk Liquidity Risk Management.
Benjamin Franklin Bank charges origination fees, or points, and
collects fees to cover the costs of appraisals and credit
reports on most residential mortgage loans originated. Benjamin
Franklin Bank also collects late charges on real estate loans,
and origination fees and prepayment penalties on commercial
mortgage loans. For information regarding Benjamin Franklin
Banks recognition of loan fees and costs, please refer to
Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements of Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp beginning on page F-7.
9
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
Benjamin Franklin Banks portfolio loan originations,
inclusive of loan purchases:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Loans at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
290,660 |
|
|
$ |
263,662 |
|
|
$ |
258,169 |
|
|
$ |
284,637 |
|
|
$ |
269,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
116,866 |
|
|
|
183,263 |
|
|
|
151,241 |
|
|
|
94,461 |
|
|
|
32,084 |
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
26,167 |
|
|
|
27,105 |
|
|
|
23,383 |
|
|
|
9,371 |
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
43,661 |
|
|
|
16,176 |
|
|
|
22,524 |
|
|
|
32,301 |
|
|
|
27,975 |
|
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
15,947 |
|
|
|
17,115 |
|
|
|
14,509 |
|
|
|
9,104 |
|
|
|
8,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,642 |
|
|
|
243,659 |
|
|
|
211,657 |
|
|
|
145,237 |
|
|
|
75,059 |
|
|
Other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
1,584 |
|
|
|
1,310 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
5,754 |
|
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
3,502 |
|
|
|
3,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,996 |
|
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
3,263 |
|
|
|
5,435 |
|
|
|
8,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans originated
|
|
|
207,638 |
|
|
|
246,868 |
|
|
|
214,920 |
|
|
|
150,672 |
|
|
|
83,944 |
|
Purchases of mortgage loans
|
|
|
34,207 |
|
|
|
26,546 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
11,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deduct:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal loan repayments and prepayments
|
|
|
115,507 |
|
|
|
149,623 |
|
|
|
140,554 |
|
|
|
114,717 |
|
|
|
74,067 |
|
|
Loan sales
|
|
|
31,185 |
|
|
|
96,256 |
|
|
|
69,752 |
|
|
|
63,244 |
|
|
|
6,645 |
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deductions
|
|
|
147,109 |
|
|
|
246,416 |
|
|
|
210,725 |
|
|
|
177,993 |
|
|
|
80,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in loans
|
|
|
94,736 |
|
|
|
26,998 |
|
|
|
5,493 |
|
|
|
(26,468 |
) |
|
|
14,820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at end of year
|
|
$ |
385,396 |
|
|
$ |
290,660 |
|
|
$ |
263,662 |
|
|
$ |
258,169 |
|
|
$ |
284,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage loans are underwritten by the Banks
staff of residential loan underwriters. Conforming loans sold to
Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae require the approval of the Senior
Underwriter. Residential mortgage loans of less than $500,000 to
be held in portfolio require the approval of the Senior
Residential Loan Officer. Residential mortgage loans of $500,000
or more but less than $1 million require the approval of
the management Credit Committee. Residential mortgage loans
$1 million or greater require the approval of the Executive
Committee of the Board.
Commercial real estate and commercial business loans are
underwritten by commercial credit analysts. For commercial real
estate loans, loan officers may approve loans up to $75,000,
while loans up to $300,000 may be approved by the Senior
Commercial Loan Officer. Commercial real estate loans of up to
$750,000 may be approved by the management Credit Committee. For
Commercial business loans, individual loan officer authority is
limited to $65,000 ($25,000 for unsecured loans). The Senior
Commercial Loan Officer may approve commercial loans of up to
$100,000 ($50,000 if unsecured), while the management Credit
Committee may approve loans of up to $200,000 ($50,000 if
unsecured). Loans over these limits require the approval of the
Executive Committee of the Board.
Consumer loans are underwritten by consumer loan underwriters.
Loan officers and Branch Managers have approval authorities
ranging from $25,000 to $35,000 ($3,500 to $10,000 if unsecured)
for these loans. The Senior Residential Loan Officer may approve
consumer loans of up to $100,000 ($25,000 if unsecured) while
the management Credit Committee may approve loans of up to
$300,000 ($25,000 if
10
unsecured). All consumer loans in excess of these limits require
the approval of the Executive Committee of the Board.
Pursuant to its loan policy, Benjamin Franklin Bank generally
will not make loans aggregating more than $5.0 million to
one borrower (or related entity). Exceptions to this limit
require the approval of the Executive Committee of the Board
prior to loan origination. As of December 31, 2004,
Benjamin Franklin had one borrower relationship over the
$5 million policy guideline, a relationship that aggregated
$6.2 million in total. Benjamin Franklin Banks
internal lending limit is lower than the Massachusetts legal
lending limit, which is 20.0% of a banks surplus and
capital stock accounts, or $7.4 million for Benjamin
Franklin Bank as of December 31, 2004.
Benjamin Franklin Bank has established a risk rating system for
its commercial real estate, construction and commercial loans.
This system evaluates a number of factors useful in indicating
the risk of default and risk of loss associated with a loan.
These ratings are performed by commercial credit analysts who do
not have responsibility for loan originations. See
Asset Quality Classification of
Assets and Loan Review.
Loan Maturity. The following table summarizes the
scheduled repayments of Benjamin Franklin Banks loan
portfolio at December 31, 2004. Demand loans, loans having
no stated repayment schedule, and overdraft loans are reported
as being due in one year or less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential Mortgage | |
|
Commercial Mortgage | |
|
Construction | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Due less than one year
|
|
$ |
11,100 |
|
|
|
5.00% |
|
|
$ |
6,262 |
|
|
|
6.15% |
|
|
$ |
17,413 |
|
|
|
6.58% |
|
Due after one year to five years
|
|
|
42,842 |
|
|
|
4.91% |
|
|
|
20,167 |
|
|
|
5.82% |
|
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
|
5.94% |
|
Due after five years
|
|
|
187,148 |
|
|
|
4.52% |
|
|
|
59,482 |
|
|
|
5.59% |
|
|
|
8,627 |
|
|
|
5.47% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
241,090 |
|
|
|
4.61% |
|
|
$ |
85,911 |
|
|
|
5.69% |
|
|
$ |
28,651 |
|
|
|
6.19% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home Equity, | |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Business | |
|
Consumer and Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Due less than one year
|
|
$ |
2,439 |
|
|
|
6.88% |
|
|
$ |
12,130 |
|
|
|
5.49% |
|
|
$ |
49,344 |
|
|
|
5.92% |
|
Due after one year to five years
|
|
|
1,028 |
|
|
|
7.02% |
|
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
6.41% |
|
|
|
68,162 |
|
|
|
5.29% |
|
Due after five years
|
|
|
908 |
|
|
|
7.19% |
|
|
|
11,725 |
|
|
|
5.25% |
|
|
|
267,890 |
|
|
|
4.83% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
4,375 |
|
|
|
6.98% |
|
|
$ |
25,369 |
|
|
|
5.45% |
|
|
$ |
385,396 |
|
|
|
5.05% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth, at December 31, 2004, the
dollar amount of total loans, net of unadvanced funds on loans,
contractually due after December 31, 2005 and whether such
loans have fixed interest rates or adjustable interest rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed | |
|
Adjustable | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Residential mortgage
|
|
$ |
85,336 |
|
|
$ |
144,654 |
|
|
$ |
229,990 |
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
4,239 |
|
|
|
75,410 |
|
|
|
79,649 |
|
Construction
|
|
|
3,036 |
|
|
|
8,202 |
|
|
|
11,238 |
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
Home equity, consumer and other
|
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
10,410 |
|
|
|
13,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
|
$ |
95,733 |
|
|
$ |
240,319 |
|
|
$ |
336,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
Asset Quality
General. One of Benjamin Franklin Banks most
important operating objectives is to maintain a high level of
asset quality. Management uses a number of strategies in
furtherance of this goal including maintaining sound credit
standards in loan originations, monitoring the loan portfolio
through internal and third-party loan reviews, and employing
active collection and workout processes for delinquent or
problem loans.
Delinquent Loans. Management performs a monthly review of
all delinquent loans. The actions taken with respect to
delinquencies vary depending upon the nature of the delinquent
loans and the period of delinquency. Generally, the Banks
requirement is that a delinquency notice be mailed no later than
the 10th or 16th day, depending on loan type, after the payment
due date. A late charge is normally assessed on loans where the
scheduled payment remains unpaid after a 10 or 15 day grace
period. After mailing delinquency notices Benjamin Franklin
Banks loan collection personnel call the borrower to
ascertain the reasons for delinquency and the prospects for
repayment. On loans secured by one-to-four family owner-occupied
property, Benjamin Franklin Bank initially attempts to work out
a payment schedule with the borrower in order to avoid
foreclosure. Any such loan restructurings must be approved by
the level of officer authority required for a new loan of that
amount. If these actions do not result in a satisfactory
resolution, Benjamin Franklin Bank refers the loan to legal
counsel and counsel initiates foreclosure proceedings. For
commercial real estate, construction and commercial loans,
collection procedures may vary depending on individual
circumstances.
The following table sets forth delinquencies in Benjamin
Franklin Banks loan portfolio as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Delinquent for | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60-89 Days | |
|
90 Days and Over | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Number | |
|
Amount | |
|
Number | |
|
Amount | |
|
Number | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
At December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Home equity, consumer and other
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
196 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
538 |
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
Home equity, consumer and other
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
710 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
$ |
715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity, consumer and other
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
54 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Other Real Estate Owned. Benjamin Franklin Bank
classifies property acquired through foreclosure or acceptance
of a deed in lieu of foreclosure as other real estate owned
(OREO) in its financial statements. When property is
placed into OREO, it is recorded at the lower of the carrying
value or the fair value less estimated costs to sell at the date
of foreclosure or acceptance of deed in lieu of foreclosure. At
the time of transfer to OREO, any excess of carrying value over
fair value is charged to the allowance for loan losses.
Management inspects all OREO property periodically. Holding
costs and declines in fair value result in charges to expense
after the property is acquired. At December 31, 2004,
Benjamin Franklin Bank had no property classified as OREO.
Classification of Assets and Loan Review. Benjamin
Franklin Bank uses an internal rating system to monitor and
evaluate the credit risk inherent in its loan portfolio. At the
time a loan is approved, all commercial real estate,
construction and commercial business loans are assigned a risk
rating based on all of the factors considered in originating the
loan. The initial risk rating is recommended by the credit
analyst charged with underwriting the loan, and subsequently
approved by the relevant loan approval authority. Current
financial information is sought for all commercial real estate,
construction and commercial borrowing relationships, and is
evaluated on at least an annual basis to determine whether the
risk rating classification is appropriate.
In Benjamin Franklin Banks loan rating system, there are
three classifications for problem assets: Substandard, Doubtful
and Loss. An asset is considered Substandard if it is
inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying
capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any.
Substandard assets are characterized by the distinct possibility
that Benjamin Franklin Bank will sustain some loss if the
deficiencies are not corrected. Doubtful assets have the
weaknesses of Substandard assets with the additional
characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or
liquidation in full questionable, on the basis of currently
existing facts, and there is a high possibility of loss. Assets
classified Loss are considered uncollectible and of such little
value that continuance as an asset of Benjamin Franklin Bank is
not warranted. Assets that possess some weaknesses, but that do
not expose Benjamin Franklin Bank to risk sufficient to warrant
classification in one of the aforementioned categories, are
designated as Special Mention. If an asset or portion thereof is
classified as Loss, it is charged off in the quarter in which it
is so classified. For assets designated as Special Mention,
Substandard or Doubtful, Benjamin Franklin Bank establishes
reserves in amounts management deems appropriate within the
allowance for loan losses. This determination as to the
classification of assets and the amount of the loss allowances
established are subject to review by regulatory agencies, which
can order the establishment of additional loss allowances. See
Asset Quality Allowance for Loan
Losses and Managements Discussion and
Analysis Critical Accounting Policies
Allowance for Loan Losses.
Benjamin Franklin Bank engages an independent third party to
conduct a semi-annual review of its commercial real estate,
construction and commercial loan portfolios. These loan reviews,
which typically include a 70.0% penetration of the various
commercial portfolios, provide a credit evaluation of individual
loans to determine whether the risk ratings assigned are
appropriate. In addition, independent loan reviews are performed
on a quarterly basis for the residential mortgage portfolio,
based on a sampling of newly originated loans during the period.
Independent loan review findings are presented directly to the
Executive Committee of the Board of Directors.
At December 31, 2004, loans classified Substandard totaled
$2.2 million, consisting of $1.9 million in commercial
real estate loans and $0.3 million in commercial loans.
Special Mention loans totaled $2.3 million, consisting of
$2.1 million in commercial real estate loans and
$0.2 million in commercial loans. One commercial loan in
the amount of $7,287 was classified as Doubtful and no loans
were classified as Loss on December 31, 2004.
13
Non-Performing Assets. The table below sets forth the
amounts and categories of our non-performing assets at the dates
indicated. At each date presented, we had no troubled debt
restructurings (loans for which a portion of interest or
principal has been forgiven and loans modified at interest rates
materially less than current market rates).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity, consumer and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-accrual loans
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans greater than 90 days delinquent and still
accruing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
Commercial mortgage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity, consumer and other
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans 90 days delinquent and still accruing
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
Loans are placed on non-accrual status either when reasonable
doubt exists as to the full timely collection of interest and
principal, or when a loan becomes 90 days past due unless
an evaluation by the management Credit Committee clearly
indicates that the loan is well-secured and in the process of
collection. Restructured loans represent performing loans for
which concessions were granted due to a borrowers
financial condition. Such concessions may include reductions of
interest rates to below-market terms and/or extension of
repayment terms.
Allowance for Loan Losses. In originating loans, Benjamin
Franklin Bank recognizes that losses will be experienced on
loans and that the risk of loss will vary with many factors,
including the type of loan being made, the creditworthiness of
the borrower over the term of the loan, general economic
conditions and, in the case of a secured loan, the quality of
the security for the loan over the term of the loan. Benjamin
Franklin Bank maintains an allowance for loan losses to absorb
losses inherent in the loan portfolio, and as such, this
allowance represents managements best estimate of the
probable known and inherent credit losses in the loan portfolio
as of the date of the financial statements.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by
management and is based upon managements periodic review
of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical
experience, portfolio volume and mix, geographic and large
borrower concentrations, estimated credit losses based on
internal and external portfolio reviews, adverse situations that
may affect the borrowers ability to repay, estimated value
of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions.
This evaluation is inherently
14
subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to
significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated
components. The specific component relates to loans that are
classified as either doubtful, substandard or special mention.
See Asset Quality Classification
of Assets and Loan Review. The general component covers
non-classified loans and is based on historical loss experience
adjusted for qualitative factors. An unallocated component is
maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect
managements estimate of probable losses. The unallocated
component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision
inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies
for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information
and events, it is probable that Benjamin Franklin Bank will be
unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or
interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan
agreement. Factors considered by management in determining
impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the
probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest
payments when due. Impairment is measured on a loan by loan
basis for commercial loans by either the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans
effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if
the loan is collateral dependent. Large groups of smaller
balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for
impairment. Accordingly, Benjamin Franklin Bank does not
separately identify individual consumer and residential loans
for impairment disclosures. At December 31, 2004, impaired
loans totaled $334,000 and in the aggregate carried a valuation
allowance of $210,000.
While Benjamin Franklin Bank believes that it has established
adequate specific and general allowances for losses on loans,
adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if future
conditions differ substantially from the information used in
making the evaluations. In addition, as an integral part of
their examination process, Benjamin Franklin Banks
regulators periodically review the allowance for loan losses.
These regulatory agencies may require the Bank to recognize
additions to the allowance based on their judgments of
information available to them at the time of their examination,
thereby negatively affecting Benjamin Franklin Banks
financial condition and earnings.
15
The following table sets forth activity in Benjamin Franklin
Banks allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
2,523 |
|
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
$ |
1,177 |
|
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
$ |
1,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate (residential real estate,
commercial real estate, construction and home equity loans)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(494 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other loans
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charge-offs
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate (residential real estate,
commercial real estate, construction and home equity loans)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial business
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other loans
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$ |
3,172 |
|
|
$ |
2,523 |
|
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
$ |
1,177 |
|
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries to average loans outstanding
(annualized)
|
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
(0.15 |
)% |
|
|
(0.11 |
)% |
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
(0.04 |
)% |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans at end of year
|
|
|
941.25 |
% |
|
|
544.92 |
% |
|
|
115,600.00 |
% |
|
|
749.68 |
% |
|
|
603.39 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans at end of year
|
|
|
0.82 |
% |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
16
The following tables set forth Benjamin Franklin Banks
percent of allowance by loan category and the percent of the
loans to total loans in each of the categories listed at the
dates indicated. The allowance for loan losses allocated to each
category is not necessarily indicative of future losses in any
particular category and does not restrict the use of the
allowance to absorb losses in other categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
|
|
of Loans | |
|
|
|
of Loans | |
|
|
|
of Loans | |
|
|
|
|
Loan | |
|
in Each | |
|
|
|
Loan | |
|
in Each | |
|
|
|
Loan | |
|
in Each | |
|
|
Allowance | |
|
Balances | |
|
Category | |
|
Allowance | |
|
Balances | |
|
Category | |
|
Allowance | |
|
Balances | |
|
Category | |
|
|
for Loan | |
|
by | |
|
to Total | |
|
for Loan | |
|
by | |
|
to Total | |
|
for Loan | |
|
by | |
|
to Total | |
|
|
Losses | |
|
Category | |
|
Loans | |
|
Losses | |
|
Category | |
|
Loans | |
|
Losses | |
|
Category | |
|
Loans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
241,090 |
|
|
|
62.56% |
|
|
$ |
485 |
|
|
$ |
172,123 |
|
|
|
59.22% |
|
|
$ |
552 |
|
|
$ |
165,007 |
|
|
|
62.58% |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
85,911 |
|
|
|
22.29% |
|
|
|
1,136 |
|
|
|
68,652 |
|
|
|
23.62% |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
51,357 |
|
|
|
19.48% |
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
505 |
|
|
|
28,651 |
|
|
|
7.43% |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
23,936 |
|
|
|
8.23% |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
21,082 |
|
|
|
8.00% |
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
23,199 |
|
|
|
6.02% |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
18,171 |
|
|
|
6.25% |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
16,507 |
|
|
|
6.26% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,605 |
|
|
|
378,851 |
|
|
|
98.30% |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
282,882 |
|
|
|
97.32% |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
253,953 |
|
|
|
96.32% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
1.14% |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
5,559 |
|
|
|
1.92% |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
6,552 |
|
|
|
2.48% |
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
0.56% |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
0.76% |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
3,157 |
|
|
|
1.20% |
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
6,545 |
|
|
|
1.70% |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
7,778 |
|
|
|
2.68% |
|
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
9,709 |
|
|
|
3.68% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,172 |
|
|
$ |
385,396 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
$ |
2,523 |
|
|
$ |
290,660 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
$ |
263,662 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
|
Percent | |
|
|
|
|
of Loans | |
|
|
|
of Loans | |
|
|
|
|
Loan | |
|
in Each | |
|
|
|
Loan | |
|
in Each | |
|
|
Allowance | |
|
Balances | |
|
Category | |
|
Allowance | |
|
Balances | |
|
Category | |
|
|
for Loan | |
|
by | |
|
to Total | |
|
for Loan | |
|
by | |
|
to Total | |
|
|
Losses | |
|
Category | |
|
Loans | |
|
Losses | |
|
Category | |
|
Loans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
172,959 |
|
|
|
66.99% |
|
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
206,918 |
|
|
|
72.69% |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
45,532 |
|
|
|
17.64% |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
44,456 |
|
|
|
15.62% |
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
19,106 |
|
|
|
7.40% |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
13,117 |
|
|
|
4.61% |
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
11,161 |
|
|
|
4.32% |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
9,778 |
|
|
|
3.44% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
248,758 |
|
|
|
96.35% |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
274,269 |
|
|
|
96.36% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
5,512 |
|
|
|
2.14% |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
5,951 |
|
|
|
2.09% |
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
3,899 |
|
|
|
1.51% |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
4,417 |
|
|
|
1.55% |
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
9,411 |
|
|
|
3.65% |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
10,368 |
|
|
|
3.64% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,177 |
|
|
$ |
258,169 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
$ |
1,068 |
|
|
$ |
284,637 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
Investment Activities
General. Benjamin Franklin Banks investment policy
is established by its Board of Directors. The Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, as authorized by
the Board, implement this policy based on the established
guidelines within the written policy. The primary objective of
the investment portfolio is to achieve a competitive rate of
return without incurring undue interest rate and credit risk, to
complement Benjamin Franklin Banks lending activities, to
provide and maintain liquidity, and to assist in managing the
interest rate sensitivity of its balance sheet. Individual
investment decisions are made based on the safety of the
investment, liquidity requirements, potential returns, cash flow
targets, and consistency with Benjamin Franklin Banks
asset/liability management objectives.
SFAS No. 115 requires Benjamin Franklin Bank to
designate its securities as held to maturity, available for sale
or trading, depending on Benjamin Franklin Banks intent
with regard to its investments at the time of purchase. At
December 31, 2004, $86.1 million or 92.3% of the
portfolio was classified as available for sale, and
$0.2 million or 0.2% of the portfolio was classified as
held to maturity. At December 31, 2004, the net unrealized
loss on securities classified as available for sale was
$1.7 million. Benjamin Franklin Bank does not currently
maintain a trading portfolio of securities.
U.S. Government and Agency Obligations. At
December 31, 2004, Benjamin Franklin Banks
U.S. Government and Agency securities portfolio totaled
$33.3 million, or 35.7% of the total portfolio on that date.
Corporate Obligations. At December 31, 2004,
Benjamin Franklin Banks portfolio of corporate obligations
totaled $5.0 million, or 5.4% of the portfolio at that
date. Benjamin Franklin Banks policy requires that
investments in corporate obligations be restricted only to those
obligations that are readily marketable and rated A
or better by a nationally recognized rating agency at the time
of purchase. At December 31, 2004, all investments in
corporate obligations were rated A or better.
Mortgage-Backed Securities. At December 31, 2004,
Benjamin Franklin Banks portfolio of mortgage-backed
securities totaled $48.0 million, or 51.4% of the portfolio
on that date, and consisted of pass-through securities
($3.7 million) and collateralized mortgage obligations
($44.3 million) directly insured or guaranteed by Freddie
Mac, Fannie Mae or the Government National Mortgage Association
(Ginnie Mae). In its purchase of collateralized mortgage
obligations, Benjamin Franklin Bank has targeted instruments in
the three to five year weighted average life tranches, with
expected average life extensions up to a maximum of seven years
in a rising rate environment. The objective of this strategy has
been to limit the potential interest rate risk due to extension
of this portfolio in a rising rate environment.
Restricted Equity Securities. At December 31, 2004,
Benjamin Franklin Banks portfolio of restricted equity
securities totaled $7.0 million or 7.5% of the portfolio at
that date. These securities consisted primarily of stock in the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston ($4.5 million) which
must be held as a condition of membership in the Federal Home
Loan Bank System and as a condition to Benjamin Franklin
Banks borrowing under the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Boston advance program. The remainder ($2.5 million)
consisted of certain other equity investments in Savings Bank
Life Insurance, the Community Investment Fund and the Depositors
Insurance Fund.
18
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the
amortized cost and market values of Benjamin Franklin
Banks investment securities at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amortized Cost | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agency obligations
|
|
$ |
33,607 |
|
|
$ |
33,306 |
|
|
$ |
30,272 |
|
|
$ |
30,347 |
|
|
$ |
67,513 |
|
|
$ |
67,582 |
|
|
State agency and municipal obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,607 |
|
|
|
33,306 |
|
|
|
30,272 |
|
|
|
30,347 |
|
|
|
68,083 |
|
|
|
68,152 |
|
|
Corporate bonds and other obligations
|
|
|
5,056 |
|
|
|
5,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,536 |
|
|
|
3,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,663 |
|
|
|
38,320 |
|
|
|
30,272 |
|
|
|
30,347 |
|
|
|
71,619 |
|
|
|
71,868 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
49,246 |
|
|
|
47,750 |
|
|
|
74,502 |
|
|
|
72,299 |
|
|
|
26,376 |
|
|
|
26,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
87,909 |
|
|
|
86,070 |
|
|
|
104,774 |
|
|
|
102,646 |
|
|
|
97,995 |
|
|
|
98,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank Investment Fund Fund One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,206 |
|
|
|
10,206 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
87,909 |
|
|
$ |
86,070 |
|
|
$ |
104,774 |
|
|
$ |
102,646 |
|
|
$ |
108,201 |
|
|
$ |
108,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
986 |
|
|
$ |
1,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock
|
|
$ |
4,459 |
|
|
$ |
4,459 |
|
|
$ |
3,707 |
|
|
$ |
3,707 |
|
|
$ |
3,707 |
|
|
$ |
3,707 |
|
|
Access Capital Strategies Community Investment Fund
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
Savings Bank Life Insurance and Depositors Insurance Fund
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total restricted equity securities
|
|
$ |
6,975 |
|
|
$ |
6,975 |
|
|
$ |
7,222 |
|
|
$ |
7,222 |
|
|
$ |
5,222 |
|
|
$ |
5,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
The table below sets forth certain information regarding the
amortized cost, weighted average yields and contractual
maturities of Benjamin Franklin Banks debt securities
portfolio at December 31, 2004. In the case of
mortgage-backed securities, the table shows the securities by
their contractual maturities, however there are scheduled
principal payments for these securities and there will also be
unscheduled prepayments prior to their contractual maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than One Year | |
|
More than Five Years | |
|
|
One Year or Less | |
|
through Five Years | |
|
through Ten Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Average | |
|
Amortized | |
|
Average | |
|
Amortized | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Yield | |
|
Cost | |
|
Yield | |
|
Cost | |
|
Yield | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agency securities
|
|
$ |
17,123 |
|
|
|
1.92 |
% |
|
$ |
16,484 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds and other obligations
|
|
|
2,503 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
% |
|
|
2,553 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,825 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
19,626 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
% |
|
|
19,037 |
|
|
|
2.33 |
% |
|
|
5,825 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
6.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
$ |
19,626 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
% |
|
$ |
19,211 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
$ |
5,825 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than Ten Years | |
|
Total Securities | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Average | |
|
Amortized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Yield | |
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
Yield | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and agency securities
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
33,607 |
|
|
$ |
33,306 |
|
|
|
2.11 |
% |
|
Corporate bonds and other obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,056 |
|
|
|
5,014 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
% |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
43,421 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
|
49,246 |
|
|
|
47,750 |
|
|
|
4.11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt securities
|
|
|
43,421 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
|
87,909 |
|
|
|
86,070 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
6.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
$ |
43,465 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
% |
|
$ |
88,126 |
|
|
$ |
88,291 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources of Funds
General. Deposits are the primary source of Benjamin
Franklin Banks funds for lending and other investment
purposes. In addition to deposits, Benjamin Franklin Bank
obtains funds from the amortization and prepayment of loans and
mortgage-backed securities, the sale or maturity of investment
securities, advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston,
and cash flows generated by operations.
Deposits. Consumer and commercial deposits are gathered
primarily from Benjamin Franklin Banks primary market area
through the offering of a broad selection of deposit products
including checking, regular savings, money market deposits and
time deposits, including certificate of deposit accounts and
individual retirement accounts. The FDIC insures deposits up to
certain limits (generally, $100,000 per depositor) and the
Depositors Insurance Fund (DIF), which is neither a government
agency nor backed by the full faith and credit of the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, fully insures amounts in excess
of such limits.
20
The maturities of Benjamin Franklin Banks certificate of
deposit accounts range from three months to five years. In
addition, Benjamin Franklin Bank offers a variety of commercial
business products to small businesses operating within its
primary market area. Currently, Benjamin Franklin Bank does not
generally negotiate interest rates to attract jumbo certificates
of deposit, but accepts deposits of $100,000 or more from
customers within its market area based on posted rates. Benjamin
Franklin Bank does not use brokers to obtain deposits.
Benjamin Franklin Bank relies primarily on competitive pricing
of its deposit products, customer service and long-standing
relationships with customers to attract and retain deposits.
Market interest rates, rates offered by financial service
competitors, the availability of other investment alternatives,
and general economic conditions significantly affect Benjamin
Franklin Banks ability to attract and retain deposits.
The following tables set forth certain information relative to
the composition of Benjamin Franklin Banks average deposit
accounts and the weighted average interest rate on each category
of deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Percent | |
|
Rate | |
|
Balance | |
|
Percent | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Deposit type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
$ |
87,969 |
|
|
|
22.12% |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
$ |
57,253 |
|
|
|
14.81% |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
NOW deposits
|
|
|
23,657 |
|
|
|
5.95% |
|
|
|
0.15% |
|
|
|
60,751 |
|
|
|
15.71% |
|
|
|
0.15% |
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
53,246 |
|
|
|
13.39% |
|
|
|
1.00% |
|
|
|
48,256 |
|
|
|
12.48% |
|
|
|
0.81% |
|
Regular savings
|
|
|
98,753 |
|
|
|
24.83% |
|
|
|
0.50% |
|
|
|
93,501 |
|
|
|
24.18% |
|
|
|
0.50% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total transaction accounts
|
|
|
263,625 |
|
|
|
66.29% |
|
|
|
0.40% |
|
|
|
259,761 |
|
|
|
67.18% |
|
|
|
0.37% |
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
134,034 |
|
|
|
33.71% |
|
|
|
2.47% |
|
|
|
126,856 |
|
|
|
32.82% |
|
|
|
2.79% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$ |
397,659 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
1.10% |
|
|
$ |
386,617 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
1.16% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Percent | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Deposit type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
$ |
36,870 |
|
|
|
10.04% |
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
NOW deposits
|
|
|
69,832 |
|
|
|
19.01% |
|
|
|
0.31% |
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
45,648 |
|
|
|
12.43% |
|
|
|
1.35% |
|
Regular savings
|
|
|
83,878 |
|
|
|
22.83% |
|
|
|
0.68% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total transaction accounts
|
|
|
236,228 |
|
|
|
64.31% |
|
|
|
0.59% |
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
131,073 |
|
|
|
35.69% |
|
|
|
3.40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$ |
367,301 |
|
|
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
1.60% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
The following table sets forth the time deposits of Benjamin
Franklin Bank classified by interest rate as of the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 2%
|
|
$ |
36,983 |
|
|
$ |
55,034 |
|
|
$ |
39,945 |
|
|
2.00%-2.99%
|
|
|
75,524 |
|
|
|
37,753 |
|
|
|
38,374 |
|
|
3.00%-3.99%
|
|
|
12,241 |
|
|
|
7,776 |
|
|
|
9,808 |
|
|
4.00%-4.99%
|
|
|
10,332 |
|
|
|
13,960 |
|
|
|
17,353 |
|
|
5.00%-5.99%
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
12,641 |
|
|
6.00%-6.99%
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
5,226 |
|
|
|
6,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
137,221 |
|
|
$ |
123,783 |
|
|
$ |
124,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of time
deposits at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31, | |
|
After December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2008 | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 2%
|
|
$ |
36,843 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
36,982 |
|
|
2.00%-2.99%
|
|
|
52,626 |
|
|
|
16,951 |
|
|
|
5,096 |
|
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,074 |
|
|
3.00%-3.99%
|
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
3,228 |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
4,661 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
12,691 |
|
|
4.00%-4.99%
|
|
|
5,415 |
|
|
|
4,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,332 |
|
|
5.00%-5.99%
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
6.00%-6.99%
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
98,965 |
|
|
$ |
25,235 |
|
|
$ |
7,532 |
|
|
$ |
5,062 |
|
|
$ |
427 |
|
|
$ |
137,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004, the aggregate amount of
outstanding certificates of deposit in amounts greater than or
equal to $100,000 was approximately $40.1 million. The
following table sets forth the maturity of those certificates as
of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Three months or less
|
|
$ |
15,285 |
|
Over three months through six months
|
|
|
6,867 |
|
Over six months through one year
|
|
|
8,251 |
|
Over one year to three years
|
|
|
7,755 |
|
Over three years
|
|
|
1,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
40,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings. Benjamin Franklin Bank utilizes advances from
the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, primarily in
connection with the funding of growth in its assets. Federal
Home Loan Bank of Boston advances are secured primarily by
certain of Benjamin Franklin Banks mortgage loans, certain
investment securities and by Benjamin Franklin Banks
holding of Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock. As of
December 31, 2004, Benjamin Franklin Bank had outstanding
$76.3 million in Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston
advances, and had the ability to borrow an additional
$89.1 million based on available collateral.
22
The following table sets forth certain information concerning
balances and interest rates on Benjamin Franklin Banks
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances at the dates and for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Years Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance at end of year
|
|
$ |
76,250 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
Average balance during year
|
|
$ |
51,497 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end
|
|
$ |
76,250 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of year
|
|
|
3.87 |
% |
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
4.47 |
% |
Weighted average interest rate during year
|
|
|
3.95 |
% |
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
4.47 |
% |
Of the $76.3 million in advances outstanding at
December 31, 2004, $36.0 million, bearing a
weighted-average interest rate of 4.47%, are callable by the
FHLBB at its option and in its sole discretion. In the event the
FHLBB calls these advances, the Bank will evaluate its liquidity
and interest rate sensitivity position at that time and
determine whether to replace the called advances with new
borrowings.
In 2002, Benjamin Franklin Bancorp raised net proceeds of
$8.7 million in a sale of $9.0 million of subordinated
debentures to Benjamin Franklin Capital Trust I (the
Trust). The Trust funded the purchase by
participating in a pooled offering of 9,000 capital securities
representing preferred ownership interests in the assets of the
Trust with a liquidation value of $1,000 each. Interest payable
on the subordinated debentures and cumulative dividends payable
quarterly on the preferred securities is 6.94% for the first
five years and thereafter will be at a rate equal to the three
month LIBOR rate plus 3.45%. Benjamin Franklin Bancorp has the
option to defer interest payments on the subordinated debentures
for up to five years and, accordingly, the Trust may defer
dividend distributions for up to five years. The debentures and
the preferred securities mature in November 2032 unless Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp elects and obtains regulatory approval to
accelerate the maturity to November 2007 or thereafter.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, Benjamin Franklin Bank had
111 full-time and 22 part-time employees. Employees
are not represented by a collective bargaining unit and Benjamin
Franklin Bank considers its relationship with its employees to
be good.
Subsidiary Activities
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp conducts its principal business
activities through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Benjamin
Franklin Bank. Subsidiaries of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and
Benjamin Franklin Bank are as follows:
Benjamin Franklin Bank Capital Trust I, a Delaware
Trust, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp. In 2002, Benjamin Franklin Bancorp raised net proceeds
of $8.7 million in a sale of $9.0 million in junior
subordinated notes due 2032 to Benjamin Franklin Capital
Trust I (the Trust). The Trust funded the
purchase by participating in a pooled offering of 9,000 capital
securities representing preferred ownership interests in the
assets of the Trust with a liquidation value of $1,000 each. The
interest rate payable on the subordinated notes is 6.94% for the
first five years and thereafter will be at a rate equal to the
three month LIBOR rate plus 3.45%.
Benjamin Franklin Securities Corp., a Massachusetts
corporation, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Benjamin Franklin
Bank. Benjamin Franklin Securities Corp. (BFSC)
engages exclusively in buying, selling and holding investment
securities on its own behalf and not as a broker. The income
earned on BFSCs investment securities is subject to a
significantly lower rate of state tax than that assessed on
income earned on investment securities maintained at Benjamin
Franklin Bank. At December 31, 2004, BFSC had total assets
of $64.1 million, consisting primarily of cash and
investment securities.
23
The Benjamin Franklin Bank Charitable Foundation
To further our commitment to our local community, we intend to
establish a charitable foundation, the Benjamin Franklin Bank
Charitable Foundation, as part of the conversion and to issue
shares of common stock to it immediately following completion of
the conversion. The charitable foundation will be incorporated
under Massachusetts law as a non-stock, nonprofit corporation.
Under its bylaws, the Benjamin Franklin Bank charitable
Foundations Board of Directors will be comprised of
individuals who are existing or former directors or officers of
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or Benjamin Franklin Bank. The
foundations place of business will be located at our
administrative offices.
We intend to make an initial contribution to the foundation of a
number of shares of our authorized but unissued common stock in
an amount up to 8.0% of the number of shares actually sold in
the offering, up to a maximum of 400,000 shares. Assuming
that we issue this maximum number, our contribution would have
an initial market value of $4.0 million and we would record
a pre-tax expense of approximately $4.0 million during the
quarter in which the conversion is completed. The charitable
foundation will be dedicated exclusively to supporting
charitable causes and community development activities in the
communities we serve, including the communities in which the
Chart Bank offices are located. The issuance of these additional
shares of common stock to the charitable foundation will:
|
|
|
|
|
dilute the voting interests of purchasers of shares of our
common stock in the offering; |
|
|
|
result in an expense, and a reduction in earnings, of
$4.0 million, offset in part by a corresponding tax
benefit, during the quarter in which the contribution is
made, and |
|
|
|
reduce our pro forma market value and, accordingly, the number
of shares that we otherwise would have offered for sale in the
stock offering. |
See Risk Factors The Contribution of Shares to
the Charitable Foundation Will Dilute Your
Ownership Interests and Adversely Affect Net Income in
2005.
As a private foundation under Section 501(c)(3) of the
Internal Revenue Code, the Benjamin Franklin Bank Charitable
Foundation will be required to distribute annually in grants or
donations a minimum of 5.0% of the average fair market value of
its net investment assets. Assuming that the fair market value
of the Benjamin Franklin Bank Charitable Foundations net
investment assets is $4.0 million, the Charitable
Foundation would make annual grants or donations of at least
$200,000. This level of annual charitable giving compares to an
average of $79,000 per year for the past three fiscal
years. As a community bank whose business depends to a large
extent upon our ties to and relationships with customers in our
local communities, we believe that this increased level of
charitable giving is appropriate, especially given our larger
asset size and larger geographic market following completion of
the conversion and the Chart Bank merger.
Regulation and Supervision
Benjamin Franklin Bank is a Massachusetts-chartered stock
savings bank and a wholly owned subsidiary of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp. Benjamin Franklin Banks deposits are insured up
to applicable limits by the FDIC through the Bank Insurance Fund
and by the DIF of the Deposit Insurance Fund of Massachusetts
for amounts in excess of the FDIC insurance limits. Benjamin
Franklin Bank is subject to extensive regulation by the
Massachusetts Division of Banks, as its chartering agency, and
by the FDIC, as its deposit insurer. Benjamin Franklin Bank is
required to file reports with, and is periodically examined by,
the FDIC and the Massachusetts Division of Banks concerning its
activities and financial condition and must obtain regulatory
approvals prior to entering into certain transactions,
including, but not limited to, mergers with or acquisitions of
other savings institutions. Benjamin Franklin Bank is a member
of the Federal Home Loan Bank and is subject to certain
limited regulation by the Federal Reserve Board.
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, as a bank holding company, is subject
to regulation by the Federal Reserve Board and is required to
file reports with the Federal Reserve Board.
24
|
|
|
Massachusetts Bank Regulation |
General. As a Massachusetts-chartered savings bank,
Benjamin Franklin Bank is subject to supervision, regulation and
examination by the Massachusetts Division of Banks and to
various Massachusetts statutes and regulations which govern,
among other things, investment powers, lending and
deposit-taking activities, borrowings, maintenance of surplus
and reserve accounts, distribution of earnings and payment of
dividends. In addition, Benjamin Franklin Bank is subject to
Massachusetts consumer protection and civil rights laws and
regulations. The Massachusetts Commissioner of Bankss
approval is required for a Massachusetts bank to establish or
close branches, merge with other banks, organize a holding
company, issue stock and undertake certain other activities.
In response to a Massachusetts law enacted in 1996, the
Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks adopted rules that generally
give Massachusetts banks powers equivalent to those of national
banks. The Commissioner also has adopted procedures reducing
regulatory burdens and expense and expediting branching by
well-capitalized and well-managed banks.
Investment Activities. In general,
Massachusetts-chartered savings banks may invest in preferred
and common stock of any corporation organized under the laws of
the United States or any state provided such investments do not
involve control of any corporation and do not, in the aggregate,
exceed 4.0% of the banks deposits. Massachusetts-chartered
savings banks may in addition invest an amount equal to 1.0% of
their deposits in stocks of Massachusetts corporations or
companies with substantial employment in the commonwealth which
have pledged to the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks that
such monies will be used for further development within the
Commonwealth. See also Federal
Regulations Investment Activities for federal
restrictions on equity investments. At the present time,
Benjamin Franklin Bank does not have authority to invest in
equity securities.
Lending Activities. Massachusetts banking laws grant
banks broad lending authority. However, with certain limited
exceptions, total obligations of one borrower to a stock bank
may not exceed 20.0% of the total of the capital stock, surplus
account and undivided profits (for banks with capital of at
least $500,000) and may not exceed 20.0% of the capital stock or
10.0% of the total of the capital stock, surplus account and
undivided profits, whichever is greater (for all other banks).
Dividends. A Massachusetts stock bank may declare from
net profits cash dividends not more frequently than quarterly
and non-cash dividends at any time. No dividends may be
declared, credited or paid if the banks capital stock is
impaired. The approval of the Massachusetts Commissioner of
Banks is required if the total of all dividends declared in any
calendar year exceeds the total of its net profits for that year
combined with its retained net profits of the preceding two
years. Net profits for this purpose means the remainder of all
earnings from current operations plus actual recoveries on loans
and investments and other assets after deducting from the total
thereof all current operating expenses, actual losses, accrued
dividends on preferred stock, if any, and all federal and state
taxes.
Regulatory Enforcement Authority. Any Massachusetts bank
that does not operate in accordance with the regulations,
policies and directives of the Massachusetts Commissioner of
Banks may be subject to sanctions for non-compliance, including
seizure of the property and business of the bank and suspension
or revocation of its charter. The Massachusetts Commissioner of
Banks may under certain circumstances suspend or remove officers
or directors who have violated the law, conducted the
banks business in a manner which is unsafe, unsound or
contrary to the depositors interests or been negligent in
the performance of their duties. In addition, upon finding that
a bank has engaged in an unfair or deceptive act or practice,
the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks may issue an order to
cease and desist and impose a fine on the bank concerned.
Finally, Massachusetts consumer protection and civil rights
statutes applicable to Benjamin Franklin Bank permit private
individual and class action law suits and provide for the
rescission of consumer transactions, including loans, and the
recovery of statutory and punitive damages and attorneys
fees in the case of certain violations or those statutes.
Insurance Sales. Massachusetts banks may engage in
insurance sales activities if the Massachusetts Commissioner of
Banks has approved its plan of operation for insurance
activities and it obtains a license
25
from the Massachusetts Division of Insurance. A bank may be
licensed directly or indirectly through an affiliate or a
subsidiary corporation established for this purpose.
DIF. All Massachusetts-chartered savings banks are
required to be members of the Deposit Insurance Fund of the
Depositors Insurance Fund of Massachusetts, a corporation that
insures savings bank deposits in excess of federal deposit
insurance coverage. The DIF is authorized to charge savings
banks an annual assessment of up to 1/50th of 1.0% of a savings
banks deposit balances in excess of amounts insured by the
FDIC.
Capital Requirements. Under FDIC regulations, federally
insured state-chartered banks that are not members of the
Federal Reserve System (state non-member banks),
such as Benjamin Franklin Bank, are required to comply with
minimum leverage capital requirements. For an institution
determined by the FDIC to not be anticipating or experiencing
significant growth and to be, in general, a strong banking
organization rated composite 1 under the Uniform Financial
Institutions Ranking System established by the Federal Financial
Institutions Examination Council, the minimum capital leverage
requirement is a ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of
3.0%. For all other institutions, the minimum leverage capital
ratio is not less than 4.0%. Tier 1 capital is the sum of
common stockholders equity, non-cumulative perpetual
preferred stock (including any related surplus) and minority
investments in certain subsidiaries, less intangible assets
(except for certain servicing rights and credit card
relationships) and certain other specified items.
The FDIC regulations require state non-member banks to maintain
certain levels of regulatory capital in relation to regulatory
risk-weighted assets. The ratio of regulatory capital to
regulatory risk-weighted assets is referred to as a banks
risk-based capital ratio. Risk-based capital ratios
are determined by allocating assets and specified off-balance
sheet items (including recourse obligations, direct credit
substitutes and residual interests) to four risk-weighted
categories ranging from 0.0% to 100.0%, with higher levels of
capital being required for the categories perceived as
representing greater risk. For example, under the FDICs
risk-weighting system, cash and securities backed by the full
faith and credit of the U.S. government are given a 0.0%
risk weight, loans secured by one- to four-family residential
properties generally have a 50.0% risk weight, and commercial
loans have a risk weighting of 100.0%.
State non-member banks must maintain a minimum ratio of total
capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, of which at
least one-half must be Tier 1 capital. Total capital
consists of Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 or
supplementary capital items, which include allowances for loan
losses in an amount of up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets,
cumulative preferred stock and certain other capital
instruments, and a portion of the net unrealized gain on equity
securities. The includable amount of Tier 2 capital cannot
exceed the amount of the institutions Tier 1 capital.
Banks that engage in specified levels of trading activities are
subject to adjustments in their risk based capital calculation
to ensure the maintenance of sufficient capital to support
market risk.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act
(FDICIA) required each federal banking agency to revise its
risk-based capital standards for insured institutions to ensure
that those standards take adequate account of interest-rate
risk, concentration of credit risk, and the risk of
nontraditional activities, as well as to reflect the actual
performance and expected risk of loss on multi-family
residential loans. The FDIC, along with the other federal
banking agencies, has adopted a regulation providing that the
agencies will take into account the exposure of a banks
capital and economic value to changes in interest rate risk in
assessing a banks capital adequacy. The FDIC also has
authority to establish individual minimum capital requirements
in appropriate cases upon determination that an
institutions capital level is, or is likely to become,
inadequate in light of the particular circumstances.
As a bank holding company, Benjamin Franklin Bancorp is subject
to capital adequacy guidelines for bank holding companies
similar to those of the FDIC for state-chartered banks. On a pro
forma consolidated basis, after the offering, Benjamin Franklin
Bancorps pro forma stockholders equity will exceed
these requirements.
26
Standards for Safety and Soundness. As required by
statute, the federal banking agencies adopted final regulations
and Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and
Soundness to implement safety and soundness standards. The
guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the
federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at
insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired.
The guidelines address internal controls and information
systems, internal audit system, credit underwriting, loan
documentation, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset
quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. Most
recently, the agencies have established standards for
safeguarding customer information. If the appropriate federal
banking agency determines that an institution fails to meet any
standard prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require
the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to
achieve compliance with the standard.
Investment Activities. Since the enactment of FDICIA, all
state-chartered FDIC insured banks, including savings banks,
have generally been limited in their investment activities to
principal and equity investments of the type and in the amount
authorized for national banks, notwithstanding state law. FDICIA
and the FDIC permit exceptions to these limitations. For
example, state chartered banks may, with FDIC approval, continue
to exercise state authority to invest in common or preferred
stocks listed on a national securities exchange or the Nasdaq
National Market and in the shares of an investment company
registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended.
The maximum permissible investment is 100.0% of Tier 1
Capital, as specified by the FDICs regulations, or the
maximum amount permitted by Massachusetts law, whichever is
less. Such authority may be terminated upon the
FDICs determination that such investments pose a safety
and soundness risk. Benjamin Franklin does not currently have
authority to invest in equity securities. In addition, the FDIC
is authorized to permit state-chartered banks institutions to
engage in state authorized activities or investments not
permissible for national banks (other than non-subsidiary equity
investments) if they meet all applicable capital requirements
and it is determined that such activities or investments do not
pose a significant risk to the Bank Insurance Fund. The FDIC has
adopted revisions to its regulations governing the procedures
for institutions seeking approval to engage in such activities
or investments. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 specifies
that a nonmember bank may control a subsidiary that engages in
activities as principal that would only be permitted for a
national bank to conduct in a financial subsidiary
if a bank meets specified conditions and deducts its investment
in the subsidiary for regulatory capital purposes.
Interstate Banking and Branching. The Riegle-Neal
Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act of 1994, or the
Interstate Banking Act, permits adequately capitalized bank
holding companies to acquire banks in any state subject to
specified concentration limits and other conditions. The
Interstate Banking Act also authorizes the interstate merger of
banks. In addition, among other things, the Interstate Banking
Act permits banks to establish new branches on an interstate
basis provided that such action is specifically authorized by
the law of the host state.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Federal law
requires, among other things, that federal bank regulatory
authorities take prompt corrective action with
respect to banks that do not meet minimum capital requirements.
For these purposes, the law establishes five capital categories:
well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized,
significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized.
The FDIC has adopted regulations to implement the prompt
corrective action legislation. An institution is deemed to be
well capitalized if it has a total risk-based
capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio of 6.0% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or
greater. An institution is adequately capitalized if
it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or greater, and
generally a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater. An institution is
undercapitalized if it has a total risk-based
capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based
capital ratio of less than 4.0%, or generally a leverage ratio
of less than 4.0%. An institution is deemed to be
significantly undercapitalized if it has a total
risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio of less than 3.0%, or a leverage ratio
of less than 3.0%. An institution is considered to be
critically undercapitalized if it has a ratio of
tangible equity (as defined in the regulations) to total assets
that is equal to or less than 2.0%. As of December 31,
2004, Benjamin Franklin Bank was a well capitalized
institution.
27
Undercapitalized banks must adhere to growth,
capital distribution (including dividend) and other limitations
and are required to submit a capital restoration plan. A
banks compliance with such a plan is required to be
guaranteed by any company that controls the undercapitalized
institution in an amount equal to the lesser of 5.0% of the
institutions total assets when deemed undercapitalized or
the amount necessary to achieve the status of adequately
capitalized. If an undercapitalized bank fails to
submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is
significantly undercapitalized. Significantly
undercapitalized banks must comply with one or more of a
number of additional restrictions, including but not limited to
an order by the FDIC to sell sufficient voting stock to become
adequately capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets,
cease receipt of deposits from correspondent banks or dismiss
directors or officers, and restrictions on interest rates paid
on deposits, compensation of executive officers and capital
distributions by the parent holding company. Critically
undercapitalized institutions are subject to additional
measures including, subject to a narrow exception, the
appointment of a receiver or conservator within 270 days
after it obtains such status.
Transactions with Affiliates. Transactions between banks
and their affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B
of the Federal Reserve Act. An affiliate of a bank is any
company or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under
common control with the bank. In a holding company context, the
parent bank holding company and any companies which are
controlled by such parent holding company are affiliates of the
bank. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal
Reserve Act (i) limit the extent to which the bank or its
subsidiaries may engage in covered transactions with
any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10.0% of such
institutions capital stock and surplus, and contain an
aggregate limit on all such transactions with all affiliates to
an amount equal to 20.0% of such institutions capital
stock and surplus and (ii) require that all such
transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at least as
favorable, to the institution or subsidiary as those provided to
a non-affiliate. The term covered transaction
includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a
guarantee and other similar transactions. In addition, loans or
other extensions of credit by the financial institution to the
affiliate are required to be collateralized in accordance with
the requirements set forth in Section 23A of the Federal
Reserve Act.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act amended several provisions of
section 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. The
amendments provide that so-called financial
subsidiaries of banks are treated as affiliates for
purposes of sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act, but
the amendment provides that (i) the 10.0% capital limit on
transactions between the bank and such financial subsidiary as
an affiliate is not applicable, and (ii) the investment by
the bank in the financial subsidiary does not include retained
earnings in the financial subsidiary. Certain anti-evasion
provisions have been included that relate to the relationship
between any financial subsidiary of a bank and sister companies
of the bank: (1) any purchase of, or investment in, the
securities of a financial subsidiary by any affiliate of the
parent bank is considered a purchase or investment by the bank;
or (2) if the Federal Reserve Board determines that such
treatment is necessary, any loan made by an affiliate of the
parent bank to the financial subsidiary is to be considered a
loan made by the parent bank.
Effective April 1, 2003, the Federal Reserve Board adopted
Regulation W that deals with the provisions of
Sections 23A and 23B. The regulation unifies and updates
staff interpretations issued over the years, incorporates
several new interpretations and provisions (such as to clarify
when transactions with an unrelated third party will be
attributed to an affiliate), and addresses new issues arising as
a result of the expanded scope of non-banking activities engaged
in by banks and bank holding companies in recent years and
authorized for financial holding companies under the
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act.
In addition, Sections 22(h) and (g) of the Federal
Reserve Act place restrictions on loans to executive officers,
directors and principal stockholders. Under Section 22(h)
of the Federal Reserve Act, loans to a director, an executive
officer and to a greater than 10.0% stockholder of a financial
institution, and certain affiliated interests of these, may not
exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such person
and affiliated interests, the financial institutions loans
to one borrower limit, generally equal to 15.0% of the
institutions unimpaired capital and surplus.
Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act also requires that
loans to directors, executive officers and principal
stockholders be made on terms
28
substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to
other persons and also requires prior board approval for certain
loans. In addition, the aggregate amount of extensions of credit
by a financial institution to insiders cannot exceed the
institutions unimpaired capital and surplus. Furthermore,
Section 22(g) of the Federal Reserve Act places additional
restrictions on loans to executive officers.
Enforcement. The FDIC has extensive enforcement authority
over insured savings state banks, including Benjamin Franklin
Bank. This enforcement authority includes, among other things,
the ability to assess civil money penalties, issue cease and
desist orders and remove directors and officers. In general,
these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to
violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound
practices. The FDIC has authority under Federal law to appoint a
conservator or receiver for an insured bank under limited
circumstances. The FDIC is required, with certain exceptions, to
appoint a receiver or conservator for an insured state
non-member bank if that bank was critically
undercapitalized on average during the calendar quarter
beginning 270 days after the date on which the institution
became critically undercapitalized. The FDIC may
also appoint itself as conservator or receiver for an insured
state non-member institution under specific circumstances on the
basis of the institutions financial condition or upon the
occurrence of other events, including: (1) insolvency;
(2) substantial dissipation of assets or earnings through
violations of law or unsafe or unsound practices;
(3) existence of an unsafe or unsound condition to transact
business; and (4) insufficient capital, or the incurring of
losses that will deplete substantially all of the
institutions capital with no reasonable prospect of
replenishment without federal assistance.
Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The FDIC has adopted a
risk-based insurance assessment system. The FDIC assigns an
institution to one of three capital categories based on the
institutions financial condition consisting of
(1) well capitalized, (2) adequately capitalized or
(3) undercapitalized, and one of three supervisory
subcategories within each capital group. The supervisory
subgroup to which an institution is assigned is based on a
supervisory evaluation provided to the FDIC by the
institutions primary federal regulator and information
which the FDIC determines to be relevant to the
institutions financial condition and the risk posed to the
deposit insurance funds. An institutions assessment rate
depends on the capital category and supervisory category to
which it is assigned. Assessment rates for insurance fund
deposits currently range from 0 basis points for the
strongest institution to 27 basis points for the weakest.
Bank Insurance Fund members are also required to assist in the
repayment of bonds issued by the Financing Corporation in the
late 1980s to recapitalize the Federal Savings and Loan
Insurance Corporation. For 2004 and 2003, Benjamin Franklin
Banks total FDIC assessment was $58,298 and $60,679,
respectively. The FDIC is authorized to raise the assessment
rates. The FDIC has exercised this authority several times in
the past and may raise insurance premiums in the future. If such
action is taken by the FDIC, it could have an adverse effect on
the earnings of Benjamin Franklin Bank.
The FDIC may terminate insurance of deposits if it finds that
the institution is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue
operations, has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, or has
violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or
condition imposed by the FDIC. The management of Benjamin
Franklin Bank does not know of any practice, condition or
violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.
The Federal Reserve Board regulations require depository
institutions to maintain non-interest-earning reserves against
their transaction accounts (primarily NOW and regular checking
accounts). The Federal Reserve Board regulations generally
require that reserves be maintained against aggregate
transaction accounts as follows: for that portion of transaction
accounts aggregating $42.1 million or less (which may be
adjusted by the Federal Reserve Board) the reserve requirement
is 3.0%; and for amounts greater than $42.1 million, 10.0%
(which may be adjusted by the Federal Reserve Board between 8.0%
and 14.0%), against that portion of total transaction accounts
in excess of $42.1 million. The first $6.0 million of
otherwise reservable balances (which may be adjusted by the
Federal Reserve Board) are exempted from the reserve
requirements. Benjamin Franklin Bank is in compliance with these
requirements.
29
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank System |
Benjamin Franklin Bank is a member of the Federal Home
Loan Bank System, which consists of 12 regional Federal
Home Loan Banks. The Federal Home Loan Bank provides a
central credit facility primarily for member institutions.
Members of the Federal Home Loan Bank are required to
acquire and hold shares of capital stock in the Federal Home
Loan Bank in an amount at least equal to 1.0% of the
aggregate principal amount of its unpaid residential mortgage
loans and similar obligations at the beginning of each year, or
1/20
of its advances (borrowings) from the Federal Home
Loan Bank, whichever is greater. Benjamin Franklin Bank was
in compliance with this requirement with an investment in
Federal Home Loan Bank stock at December 31, 2004 of
$4.5 million. At December 31, 2004, Benjamin Franklin
Bank had $76.3 million in Federal Home Loan Bank
advances.
The Federal Home Loan Banks are required to provide funds
for certain purposes including the resolution of insolvent
thrifts in the late 1980s and to contributing funds for
affordable housing programs. These requirements could reduce the
amount of dividends that the Federal Home Loan Banks pay to
their members and result in the Federal Home Loan Banks
imposing a higher rate of interest on advances to their members.
If dividends were reduced, or interest on future Federal Home
Loan Bank advances increased, a member bank affected by
such reduction or increase would likely experience a reduction
in its net interest income. Recent legislation has changed the
structure of the Federal Home Loan Banks funding
obligations for insolvent thrifts, revised the capital structure
of the Federal Home Loan Banks and implemented entirely
voluntary membership for Federal Home Loan Banks. For 2004
and 2003, cash dividends from the Federal Home Loan Bank to
Benjamin Franklin Bank amounted to approximately $110,090 and
$112,997, respectively. There can be no assurance that such
dividends will continue in the future. Further, there can be no
assurance that the impact of recent or future legislation on the
Federal Home Loan Banks also will not cause a decrease in
the value of the Federal Home Loan Bank stock held by
Benjamin Franklin Bank.
|
|
|
Holding Company Regulation |
General. As a bank holding company, Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp is subject to comprehensive regulation and regular
examinations by the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve
Board also has extensive enforcement authority over bank holding
companies, including, among other things, the ability to assess
civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist or removal
orders and to require that a holding company divest subsidiaries
(including its bank subsidiaries). In general, enforcement
actions may be initiated for violations of law and regulations
and unsafe or unsound practices.
As a bank holding company, Benjamin Franklin Bancorp must obtain
the approval of the Federal Reserve Board before:
(i) acquiring, directly or indirectly, ownership or control
of any voting shares of another bank or bank holding company if,
after such acquisition, it would own or control more than 5.0%
of such shares (unless it already owns or controls the majority
of such shares); (ii) acquiring all or substantially all of
the assets of another bank or bank holding company; or
(iii) merging or consolidating with another bank holding
company. In addition, Benjamin Franklin Bancorp must obtain the
approval of the Massachusetts Board of Bank Incorporation before
becoming a bank holding company for Massachusetts
law purposes. Under Massachusetts law, a bank holding company is
generally defined as a company that directly or indirectly owns,
controls or holds with power to vote 25.0% of the voting
stock of each of two or more banking institutions.
Under Federal Reserve Board policy, a bank holding company must
serve as a source of strength for its subsidiary bank. Under
this policy, the Federal Reserve Board may require, and has
required in the past, a holding company to contribute additional
capital to an undercapitalized subsidiary bank.
The Banking Holding Company Act also prohibits a bank holding
company, with certain exceptions, from acquiring direct or
indirect ownership or control of more than 5.0% of the voting
shares of any company which is not a bank or bank holding
company, or from engaging directly or indirectly in activities
other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or
providing services for its subsidiaries. The principal
exceptions to these prohibitions involve certain non-bank
activities which, by statute or by
30
Federal Reserve Board regulation or order, have been identified
as activities closely related to the business of banking or
managing or controlling banks. The list of activities permitted
by the Federal Reserve Board includes, among other things:
(i) operating a savings institution, mortgage company,
finance company, credit card company or factoring company;
(ii) performing certain data processing operations;
(iii) providing certain investment and financial advice;
(iv) underwriting and acting as an insurance agent for
certain types of credit-related insurance; (v) leasing
property on a full-payout, non-operating basis;
(vi) selling money orders, travelers checks and
United States Savings Bonds; (vii) real estate and personal
property appraising; (viii) providing tax planning and
preparation services; (ix) financing and investing in
certain community development activities; and (x) subject
to certain limitations, providing securities brokerage services
for customers. Benjamin Franklin Bancorp has no present plans to
engage in any of these activities.
Dividends. The Federal Reserve Board has issued a policy
statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding
companies, which expresses the Federal Reserve Boards view
that a bank holding company should pay cash dividends only to
the extent that the holding companys net income for the
past year is sufficient to cover both the cash dividends and a
rate of earnings retention that is consistent with the holding
companys capital needs, asset quality and overall
financial condition. The Federal Reserve Board also indicated
that it would be inappropriate for a company experiencing
serious financial problems to borrow funds to pay dividends.
Furthermore, under the prompt corrective action regulations
adopted by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Reserve Board
may prohibit a bank holding company from paying any dividends if
the holding companys bank subsidiary is classified as
undercapitalized.
Bank holding companies are required to give the Federal Reserve
Board prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of its
outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the
purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration
paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding
12 months, is equal to 10.0% or more of the consolidated
net worth of the bank holding company. The Federal Reserve Board
may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines
that the proposal would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice
or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve Board
order or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with,
the Federal Reserve Board. This notification requirement does
not apply to any company that meets the well-capitalized
standard for commercial banks, is well managed
within the meaning of the Federal Reserve Board regulations and
is not subject to any unresolved supervisory issues.
Financial Modernization. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act
permits greater affiliation among banks, securities firms,
insurance companies, and other companies under a type of
financial services company known as a financial holding
company. A financial holding company essentially is a bank
holding company with significantly expanded powers. Financial
holding companies are authorized by statute to engage in a
number of financial activities previously impermissible for bank
holding companies, including securities underwriting, dealing
and market making; sponsoring mutual funds and investment
companies; insurance underwriting and agency; and merchant
banking activities. The act also permits the Federal Reserve
Board and the Treasury Department to authorize additional
activities for financial holding companies if they are
financial in nature or incidental to
financial activities. A bank holding company may become a
financial holding company if each of its subsidiary banks is
well capitalized, well managed, and has at least a
satisfactory Community Reinvestment Act rating. A
financial holding company must provide notice to the Federal
Reserve Board within 30 days after commencing activities
previously determined by statute or by the Federal Reserve Board
and Department of the Treasury to be permissible. Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp has not submitted notice to the Federal Reserve
Board of its intent to be deemed a financial holding company.
However, it is not precluded from submitting a notice in the
future should it wish to engage in activities only permitted to
financial holding companies.
Community Reinvestment Act. Under the Community
Reinvestment Act (CRA), as amended as implemented by FDIC
regulations, a bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation,
consistent with its
31
safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of its
entire community, including low and moderate income
neighborhoods. The CRA does not establish specific lending
requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it
limit an institutions discretion to develop the types of
products and services that it believes are best suited to its
particular community, consistent with the CRA. The CRA does
require the FDIC, in connection with its examination of a bank,
to assess the institutions record of meeting the credit
needs of its community and to take such record into account in
its evaluation of certain applications by such institution,
including applications to acquire branches and other financial
institutions. The CRA requires the FDIC to provide a written
evaluation of an institutions CRA performance utilizing a
four-tiered descriptive rating system. Benjamin Franklin
Banks latest FDIC CRA rating was satisfactory.
Massachusetts has its own statutory counterpart to the CRA which
is also applicable to Benjamin Franklin Bank and Chart Bank. The
Massachusetts version is generally similar to the CRA but
utilizes a five-tiered descriptive rating system. Massachusetts
law requires the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks to
consider, but not be limited to, a banks record of
performance under Massachusetts law in considering any
application by the bank to establish a branch or other
deposit-taking facility, to relocate an office or to merge or
consolidate with or acquire the assets and assume the
liabilities of any other banking institution. Benjamin Franklin
Banks most recent rating under Massachusetts law was
high satisfactory.
Consumer Protection And Fair Lending Regulations.
Massachusetts savings banks are subject to a variety of
federal and Massachusetts statutes and regulations that are
intended to protect consumers and prohibit discrimination in the
granting of credit. These statutes and regulations provide for a
range of sanctions for non-compliance with their terms,
including imposition of administrative fines and remedial
orders, and referral to the Attorney General for prosecution of
a civil action for actual and punitive damages and injunctive
relief. Certain of these statutes authorize private individual
and class action lawsuits and the award of actual, statutory and
punitive damages and attorneys fees for certain types of
violations.
Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results
The following risk factors are relevant to our future results
and financial success, and you should read them with care:
|
|
|
Our Financial Success Depends In Part On The Success
Of Our Acquisition of Chart Bank. |
Our future operating performance will depend, in part, on the
success of the merger with Chart Bank, which will be the largest
merger Benjamin Franklin Bancorp has consummated. The success of
the merger will, in turn, depend on a number of factors,
including our ability to:
|
|
|
|
|
integrate into Benjamin Franklin Bank the operations and
branches of Chart Bank, |
|
|
|
retain Chart Banks deposits and customers, |
|
|
|
control future non-interest expenses in a manner that enables us
to improve our overall operating efficiencies, |
|
|
|
retain and integrate key personnel of Chart Bank into our
operations, particularly those with specialized expertise in the
ATM management business operated by Chart Banks
subsidiary, Creative Strategic Solutions, Inc. |
Integration of Chart Bank into Benjamin Franklin Bank following
the merger will require the dedication of the time and resources
of our management and may temporarily distract managements
attention from our day-to-day business. No assurance can be
given that we will successfully integrate Chart Banks
operations into our own, or that we will achieve anticipated
benefits of the merger or achieve earnings results in the future
similar to those we, or Chart Bank, have achieved in the past.
Further, no assurance can be given that we will effectively
manage any growth resulting from the merger.
32
|
|
|
Our Commercial Real Estate, Construction And Commercial
Business Loans May Expose Us To Increased Credit Risks, And This
Risk Will Increase If We Succeed In Increasing These Types Of
Loans. |
Residential real estate loans represent a smaller proportion of
our loan portfolio than the average for savings institutions in
New England. As of December 31, 2004, commercial real
estate, construction and commercial business loans represented
30.9% of our loan portfolio. This percentage would have been
41.2% on a pro forma basis as of that date with the acquisition
of Chart Bank, and we intend to grow commercial real estate and
commercial business loans further as a proportion of our
portfolio over the next several years. Construction loans, while
they are not likely to increase as a percentage of total loans,
are expected to increase in absolute terms in line with the
overall growth in the banks loan portfolio. In general,
construction loans, commercial real estate loans and commercial
business loans generate higher returns, but also pose greater
credit risks, than do owner-occupied residential mortgage loans.
As our various commercial loan portfolios increase, the
corresponding risks and potential for losses from these loans
may also increase.
The repayment of construction and commercial real estate loans
depends on the business and financial condition of borrowers
and, in the case of construction loans, on the economic
viability of projects financed. A number of our borrowers have
more than one construction or commercial real estate loan
outstanding with us. Further, these loans are concentrated
primarily in Eastern Massachusetts. Economic events and changes
in government regulations, which we and our borrowers cannot
control, could have an adverse impact on the cash flows
generated by properties securing our construction and commercial
real estate loans and on the values of the properties securing
those loans. Commercial properties tend to decline in value more
rapidly than residential owner-occupied properties during
economic recessions. We held $114.6 million in construction
and commercial real estate loans in our loan portfolio as of
December 31, 2004 representing 29.7% of total loans on that
date. On a pro forma basis on that date, assuming that the
merger with Chart Bank had been completed, we would have had
$222.8 million of these loans in our portfolio representing
40.0% of total loans.
We make both secured and some short-term unsecured commercial
business loans, holding $4.4 million of these loans in our
loan portfolio as of December 31, 2004, representing 1.1%
of total loans on that date. On a pro forma basis on that date,
assuming that the merger with Chart Bank had been completed, we
would have had $9.4 million of commercial business loans in
our portfolio, representing 1.7% of total loans. Repayment of
both secured and unsecured commercial business loans depends
substantially on borrowers underlying business, financial
condition and cash flows. Unsecured loans generally involve a
higher degree of risk of loss than do secured loans because,
without collateral, repayment is wholly dependent upon the
success of the borrowers businesses. Secured commercial
business loans are generally collateralized by equipment,
leases, inventory and accounts receivable. Compared to real
estate, that type of collateral is more difficult to monitor,
its value is harder to ascertain, it may depreciate more rapidly
and it may not be as readily saleable if repossessed.
|
|
|
Our Continuing Concentration Of Loans In Our Primary
Market Area May Increase Our Risk. |
Our success depends primarily on the general economic conditions
in the counties in which we conduct business, and in the Boston
metropolitan area in general. Unlike larger banks that are more
geographically diversified, we provide banking and financial
services to customers primarily in Norfolk and Worcester
Counties, Massachusetts, southwest of Boston, and to lesser
degree in Middlesex and Suffolk Counties, which include the City
of Boston and areas east of Boston. Following our proposed
acquisition of Chart Bank, we will expand our presence in
Middlesex and Suffolk Counties. The local economic conditions in
our market area have a significant impact on our loans, the
ability of the borrowers to repay these loans and the value of
the collateral securing these loans. A significant decline in
general economic conditions caused by inflation, recession,
unemployment or other factors beyond our control would affect
these local economic conditions and could adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations. Additionally,
because we have a significant amount of commercial real estate
loans, decreases in tenant
33
occupancy may also have a negative effect on the ability of many
of our borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans, which
would have an adverse impact on our earnings.
|
|
|
Our Return On Equity May Initially Be Low Compared To
Other Financial Institutions. A Low Return Could Lower The
Trading Price Of Our Common Stock. |
Net income divided by average equity, known as return on
equity, is a ratio many investors use to compare the
performance of a financial institution to its peers. Our return
on equity may be reduced due to the expenses we will incur in
pursuing our growth strategies, the costs of being a public
company and added expenses associated with our employee stock
ownership plan and planned stock-based incentive plan. The
increase in our core deposit intangible asset created by the
Chart Bank acquisition will also have a negative impact on our
return on equity, and if our periodic evaluation of the goodwill
created by the Chart Bank acquisition results in a determination
of impairment, we would be required to reduce its carrying value
through a charge to earnings. Until we can increase our net
interest income and non-interest income, we expect our return on
equity to be below the industry average for public thrifts,
which may negatively affect the value of our common stock.
|
|
|
We May Have Difficulty Meeting Our Branch Expansion Goals,
And Our Branch Expansion Strategy May Not Be Accretive To
Earnings. |
Our growth plans include the opening of new branch offices in
communities located between the Benjamin Franklin Bank and Chart
Bank franchises as well as in other communities contiguous to
those currently served by Benjamin Franklin Bank. Our ability to
establish new branches will depend upon whether we can identify
suitable sites and negotiate acceptable lease or purchase and
sale terms, and we may not be able to do so, or it may take
longer than we expect. Moreover, once we establish a new branch,
numerous factors will contribute to its performance, such as a
suitable location, qualified personnel and an effective
marketing strategy. Additionally, it takes time for a new branch
to gather significant loans and deposits to generate enough
income to offset its expenses, some of which, like salaries and
occupancy expense, are relatively fixed costs. There can be no
assurance that our branch expansion strategy will be accretive
to our earnings, or that it will be accretive to earnings within
a reasonable period of time.
|
|
|
Strong Competition Within Our Market Area May Limit Our
Growth And Profitability. |
We face significant competition both in attracting deposits and
in the origination of loans. Savings banks, credit unions,
savings and loan associations and commercial banks operating in
our primary market area have historically provided most of our
competition for deposits. In addition, and particularly in times
of high interest rates, we face additional and significant
competition for funds from money-market mutual funds and issuers
of corporate and government securities. Competition for the
origination of real estate and other loans comes from other
thrift institutions, commercial banks, insurance companies,
finance companies, other institutional lenders and mortgage
companies. Many of our competitors have substantially greater
financial and other resources than ours. Moreover, we may face
increased competition in the origination of loans if competing
thrift institutions convert to stock form, because such
converting thrifts would likely seek to invest their new capital
into loans. Finally, credit unions do not pay federal or state
income taxes and are subject to fewer regulatory constraints
than savings banks and as a result, they may enjoy a competitive
advantage over us. This advantage places significant competitive
pressure on the prices of our loans and deposits.
|
|
|
Our Ability to Grow May Be Limited if We Cannot Make
Acquisitions. |
In an effort to increase our loan and deposit growth, we will
continue to seek to expand our banking franchise, including
through acquisitions of other financial institutions or branches
if opportunities arise. Our ability to grow through selective
acquisitions of other financial institutions or branches will
depend on successfully identifying, acquiring and integrating
them. We compete with other financial institutions with respect
to proposed acquisitions. We cannot assure you that we will be
able to identify attractive acquisition candidates or make
acquisitions on favorable terms. In addition, we cannot assure
you that we
34
can successfully integrate any acquired financial institutions
or branches into our banking organization in a timely or
efficient manner, that we will be successful in retaining
existing customer relationships or that we can achieve
anticipated operating efficiencies.
|
|
|
We Operate In A Highly Regulated Environment And May Be
Adversely Affected By Changes In Law And Regulations. |
We are subject to extensive regulation, supervision and
examination. See Regulation and Supervision. Any
change in the laws or regulations applicable to us, or in
banking regulators supervisory policies or examination
procedures, whether by the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks,
the FDIC, the Federal Reserve Board, other state or federal
regulators, the United States Congress or the Massachusetts
legislature could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows.
We are subject to regulations promulgated by the Massachusetts
Division of Banks, as our chartering authority, and by the FDIC
as the insurer of our deposits up to certain limits. We also
belong to the Federal Home Loan Bank System and, as a
member of such system, we are subject to certain limited
regulations promulgated by the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Boston. In addition, the Federal Reserve Board regulates and
oversees Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, as a Bank holding company.
This regulation and supervision limits the activities in which
we may engage. The purpose of regulation and supervision is
primarily to protect our depositors and borrowers and, in the
case of FDIC regulation, the FDICs insurance fund.
Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in the exercise
of their supervisory and enforcement powers. They may, among
other things, impose restrictions on the operation of a banking
institution, the classification of assets by such institution
and such institutions allowance for loan losses.
Regulatory and law enforcement authorities also have wide
discretion and extensive enforcement powers under various
consumer protection and civil rights laws, including the
Truth-in-Lending Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair
Housing Act, the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and
Massachusettss deceptive acts and practices law. These
laws also permit private individual and class action law suits
and provide for the recovery of attorneys fees in certain
instances. No assurance can be given that the foregoing
regulations and supervision will not change so as to affect us
adversely.
|
|
|
Changes in Market Interest Rates Could Adversely Affect
Our Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
Our profitability, like that of most financial institutions,
depends to a large extent upon our net interest income, which is
the difference, or spread, between our gross interest income on
interest-earning assets, such as loans and securities, and our
interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities, such as
deposits and borrowed funds. Accordingly, our results of
operations and financial condition depend largely on movements
in market interest rates and our ability to manage our
interest-rate-sensitive assets and liabilities in response to
these movements, including our adjustable-rate mortgage loans,
which represent the largest portion of our residential loan
portfolio. Changes in interest rates could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows. Because, as a general matter, our
interest-bearing liabilities re-price or mature more quickly
than our interest-earning assets, an increase in interest rates
generally would result in a decrease in our interest rate spread
and net interest income.
Changes in interest rates also affect the value of our
interest-earning assets, including, in particular, the value of
our investment securities portfolio. Generally, the value of
investment securities fluctuates inversely with changes in
interest rates. At December 31, 2004, our securities
portfolio totaled $93.3 million, including
$86.1 million of securities available for sale. Unrealized
gains and losses on securities available for sale are reported
as a separate component of surplus, net of related taxes.
Decreases in the fair value of securities available for sale
therefore would have an adverse affect on our stockholders
equity. We are also subject to reinvestment risk relating to
interest rate movements. Decreases in interest
35
rates can result in increased prepayments of loans and
mortgage-related securities, as borrowers refinance to reduce
their borrowing costs. Under these circumstances, we are subject
to reinvestment risk to the extent that we are not able to
reinvest funds from such prepayments at rates that are
comparable to the rates on the prepaid loans or securities. On
the other hand, increases in interest rates on adjustable-rate
mortgage loans result in larger mortgage payments due from
borrowers, which could potentially increase our level of loan
delinquencies and defaults.
|
|
|
The Issuance of Additional Shares May Dilute the
Ownership Interest of Common Stockholders. |
The exact number of shares of common stock to be issued in the
conversion will not be determined until we obtain an updated
appraisal immediately prior to the completion of the sale of the
common stock. However, in general, the higher the number of
shares of common stock issued, the lower our pro forma net
income per share and pro forma stockholders equity per
share, and the higher the purchase price of a share of our
common stock as a percentage of pro forma stockholders
equity per share and as a multiple of net income per share. Due
to the intangibles (goodwill and core deposit value) created
from the acquisition of Chart Bank, our pro forma tangible
stockholders equity per share increases with a higher
number of common shares issued, and therefore the purchase price
of a share of our common stock as a percentage of pro forma
stockholders tangible equity per share decreases. In
addition, the issuance of shares to stockholders of Chart Bank
in connection with the merger will dilute the ownership interest
of purchasers of shares of common stock in the conversion.
|
|
|
Relatively High Price to Pro Forma Tangible
Stockholders Equity May Negatively Affect After-Market
Stock Performance Compared with Other Recently Converted
Institutions. |
As a result of the relatively high purchase price of a share of
our common stock as a percentage of pro forma tangible
stockholders equity per share, the after-market
performance of our common stock may be less favorable during the
period immediately following the conversion than the price
performance of common stock sold in recent mutual-to-stock
conversions.
The purchase price of a share of our common stock as a
percentage of pro forma tangible stockholders equity per
share exceeds by a significant amount the comparable ratios with
respect to common stock sold in standard mutual-to-stock
conversions to date that do not also involve acquisitions of
other financial institutions. The ratio of purchase price to pro
forma tangible stockholders equity is also consistent with
or in excess of the comparable ratios of the two recent
conversions involving acquisitions of other financial
institutions: NewAlliance Bancshares, Inc. and KNBT Bancorp,
Inc. Although the common stock of those companies experienced
significant market appreciation immediately following the
offerings, and both stocks continue to trade well above the
initial offering price, there can be no assurance that our
common stock will not trade below $10.00 per share, as has
been the case for some converted mutual institutions, including
some institutions that have recently converted. The increase in
any particular companys stock price is subject to various
factors, including the amount of proceeds a company raises, the
market in which it operates and the quality of management and
managements ability to deploy the conversion proceeds. In
addition, stock prices may be affected by general market
conditions, the interest rate environment, the market for
financial institutions, merger or takeover transactions, the
presence of professional and other investors who purchase stock
on speculation, as well as other unforeseeable events not
necessarily in the control of management. Finally, those
transactions occurred primarily during a falling interest rate
environment, during which time the market for financial
institution stocks typically increases. If interest rates rise,
our net interest income and the value of our assets could be
reduced, which could negatively affect our stock price.
|
|
|
Our Stock-Based Benefit Plans Will Increase Our Costs,
Which Will Reduce Our Income. |
We have adopted an employee stock ownership plan, and we expect
to adopt a stock-based incentive plan after the conversion,
subject to stockholder approval. The allocation to employees of
shares under the employee stock ownership plan and the granting
of restricted stock awards and stock options under the
stock-based incentive plan will increase our future compensation
costs, thereby reducing our earnings.
36
|
|
|
The Implementation of Stock-Based Benefit Plans Will
Dilute Your Ownership Interest. |
We expect to adopt a stock-based incentive plan following the
conversion, subject to stockholder approval, and such plan could
dilute the voting rights of our stockholders. Federal and state
banking regulations allow our Board of Directors, and the Board
may decide, to adopt one or more stock plans for the benefit of
our employees, officers and directors. This stock-based
incentive plan will be funded either through open market
purchases, if permitted, or from the issuance of authorized but
unissued shares of common stock of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp.
While our intention is to fund this plan through open market
purchases, stockholders will experience a reduction or dilution
in ownership interest of approximately 12.9% (approximately 9.1%
dilution for stock options and approximately 3.8% dilution for
restricted stock awards) in the event newly issued shares are
used to fund stock options and stock awards made under this plan.
|
|
|
The Contribution of Shares to the Charitable Foundation
Will Dilute Your Ownership Interests and Adversely Affect
Net Income in 2005. |
In connection with our conversion from mutual to stock form, we
will contribute to the Benjamin Franklin Bank Charitable
Foundation 400,000 shares of our common stock, valued at
the $10 offering price. Persons purchasing shares in the
offering will have their ownership and voting interests in
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp diluted by this contribution.
This contribution will have a material adverse effect on our
reported net income for the quarter and year in which the
contribution to the Benjamin Franklin Bank Charitable Foundation
is made. Assuming that the contribution will be fully
deductible, the after-tax expense of the contribution will
reduce net income that we report in our 2005 fiscal year by
approximately $2.6 million. If the contribution is
determined to be less than fully deductible, then the after-tax
expense recorded in that quarter could be a maximum of
$4.0 million.
We believe that our contribution to the Benjamin Franklin Bank
Charitable Foundation should be deductible for federal income
tax purposes. However, we do not have any assurance that the IRS
will grant tax-exempt status to the Benjamin Franklin Bank
Charitable Foundation. If the contribution is not deductible, we
would not receive any tax benefit from the contribution. In
addition, even if the contribution is tax deductible, we may not
have sufficient profits to be able to fully use the deduction
over the six years allowed.
|
|
|
We Have Never Issued Stock and We Cannot Guarantee That An
Active Trading Market Will Develop. |
As a mutual institution, Benjamin Franklin Bancorp has never
issued capital stock and, consequently, there is currently no
existing market for our common stock. We have received approval
to have our common stock quoted on the Nasdaq National Market
under the symbol BFBC subject to the completion of
the conversion and compliance with initial listing conditions,
including the presence of at least three market makers.
A public trading market having the desirable characteristics of
depth, liquidity and orderliness depends upon the existence of
willing buyers and sellers at any given time, the presence of
which is dependent upon the individual decisions of buyers and
sellers over which neither we nor any market maker has control.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that an active and liquid
trading market for our common stock will develop or that, if
developed, it will continue. The failure of an active and liquid
trading market to develop would likely have a material adverse
effect on the value of the our common stock. In addition, no
assurance can be given that a purchaser in the conversion will
be able to resell our common stock at or above the purchase
price of the shares, nor can any assurance be given that a Chart
Bank stockholder receiving shares in the merger will be able to
sell those shares at or above the $10 price used in the
calculation of the exchange ratio for the merger.
37
|
|
|
Our Stock Value May Suffer From Anti-Takeover Provisions
That May Impede Potential Takeovers. |
Our governing statute, and our articles and by-laws, contain
provisions (sometimes known as anti-takeover provisions) that
may impede efforts to acquire us, or stock purchases in
furtherance of an acquisition, even though acquisition efforts
or stock purchases might otherwise have a favorable effect on
the price of our common stock. Those provisions will also make
it more difficult to remove our board and management. The
Massachusetts Business Corporation Law provides for staggered
directors terms, limits the stockholders ability to
remove directors and empowers only the directors to fill board
vacancies. Even if our board elects to opt out of these
statutory provisions, our articles contain similar provisions.
Our articles and by-laws also provide for, among other things,
restrictions on the acquisition of more than 10.0% of our
outstanding voting stock for a period of five years after
completion of the conversion, and approval of certain actions,
including certain business combinations, by specified
percentages of our disinterested Directors (as
defined in the articles) or by specified percentages of the
shares outstanding and entitled to vote. The articles also
authorize the Board of Directors to issue shares of preferred
stock, the rights and preferences of which may be designated by
the Board, without the approval of our stockholders. The
articles also establish supermajority voting requirements for
amendments to the articles and by-laws, limit stockholders
ability to call special meetings of stockholders, and impose
advance notice provisions on stockholders ability to
nominate directors or to propose matters for consideration at
stockholder meetings.
Our employee stock ownership plan, which expects to purchase a
number of shares equal to 8.0% of the shares issued in the
offering, contains provisions that permit participating
employees to direct the voting of shares held in the employee
stock ownership plan, and those provisions may have
anti-takeover effects.
The Benjamin Franklin Bank Charitable Foundation will be funded
with 400,000 shares of our common stock, approximately 4.7%
of the shares expected to be issued and outstanding after the
conversion, including shares issued to the Chart Bank
stockholders in the merger. The Benjamin Franklin Bank
Charitable Foundations Board of Directors will consist of
current directors of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp.
Federal and state regulations and laws may also have
anti-takeover effects. The Change in Bank Control Act and the
Bank Holding Company Act, together with Federal Reserve Board
regulations under those acts, require that a person obtain the
consent of the Federal Reserve Board before attempting to
acquire control of a bank holding company. In addition,
Massachusetts laws place certain limitations on acquisitions of
the stock of banking institutions and imposes restrictions on
business combination transactions between publicly held
Massachusetts corporations and stockholders owning 5% or more of
the stock of those corporations.
|
|
|
Risks Related To Prior Auditors Of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp |
Arthur Andersen LLP, which audited the financial statements
included in this prospectus of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp for the
year ended December 31, 2001, was convicted on
June 15, 2002 of federal obstruction of justice arising
from the governments investigation of Enron Corp. As it
has ceased operations, Arthur Andersen LLP has not consented to
include in this prospectus their report on the financial
statements of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp for the year ended
December 31, 2001. Under Section 11 of the Securities
Act of 1933, investors may have no effective remedy against
Arthur Andersen LLP in connection with a material misstatement
or omission in the 2001 financial statements of Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp included in this prospectus.
38
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements, which
can be identified by the use of such words as estimate, project,
believe, intend, anticipate, plan, seek, expect and similar
expressions. These forward-looking statements include:
|
|
|
|
|
statements of our goals, intentions and expectations; |
|
|
|
statements regarding our business plans and prospects and growth
and operating strategies; |
|
|
|
statements regarding the asset quality of our loan and
investment portfolios; and |
|
|
|
estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits. |
These forward-looking statements are subject to significant
risks, assumptions and uncertainties, including, among other
things, the following important factors that could affect the
actual outcome of future events:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to consummate the acquisition of Chart Bank; |
|
|
|
our ability to integrate the Chart Bank merger successfully; |
|
|
|
our ability to enter new markets successfully and take advantage
of growth opportunities; |
|
|
|
significantly increased competition among depository and other
financial institutions; |
|
|
|
inflation and changes in the interest rate environment that
reduce our margins or reduce the fair value of financial
instruments; |
|
|
|
general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market
areas, that are worse than expected; |
|
|
|
adverse changes in the securities markets; |
|
|
|
legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our
business; |
|
|
|
changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; |
|
|
|
changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted
by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board and the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board; and |
|
|
|
changes in our organization, compensation and benefit
plans; and |
|
|
|
the risk factors described above. |
Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future
results may be materially different from the results indicated
by these forward-looking statements. We discuss these and other
uncertainties in Risk Factors. We disclaim any
intent or obligation to update forward-looking statements
whether in response to new information, future events or
otherwise.
Benjamin Franklin Bank conducts its business through its main
office located in Franklin, Massachusetts and five other offices
located southeast of the Boston metropolitan area. All of
Benjamin Franklin Banks office facilities are owned by the
Bank. The following table sets forth information about our
offices as of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
Location |
|
Opened |
|
|
|
|
|
Main Office:
|
|
58 Main Street, Franklin, MA 02038 |
|
|
1935 |
|
Branch Offices:
|
|
231 East Central St., Franklin, MA 02038 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
4 North Main St., Bellingham, MA 02019 |
|
|
1982 |
|
|
|
1 Mechanic St., Foxborough, MA 02035 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
76 North Street, Medfield, MA 02052 |
|
|
1998 |
|
|
|
221 Main Street, Milford, MA 01757 |
|
|
1992 |
|
39
|
|
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp is not involved in any legal
proceedings other than routine legal proceedings occurring in
the ordinary course of business. Management believes that those
routine legal proceedings involve, in the aggregate, amounts
that are immaterial to the financial condition and results of
operations of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp.
|
|
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
Not applicable.
PART II
|
|
Item 5. |
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities |
(a)(1) Market Information.
We have not previously issued common stock, so there is
currently no established market for the common stock. We have
received approval to have our common stock quoted on the Nasdaq
National Market under the symbol BFBC after
completion of the offering. Ryan Beck & Co., Inc. has
advised us that it intends to make a market in the common stock
following the conversion, but is under no obligation to do so.
We will encourage and assist additional market makers to make a
market in our common stock.
The development of an active trading market depends on the
existence of willing buyers and sellers, the presence of which
is not within our control, or the control of any market maker.
The number of active buyers and sellers of the common stock at
any particular time may be limited. Under such circumstances,
our stockholders could have difficulty selling their shares on
short notice, and, therefore, should not view the common stock
as a short-term investment. We cannot assure you that an active
trading market for the common stock will develop or that, if it
develops, it will continue, nor can we assure you that you will
be able to sell shares of our common stock at any particular
price.
(a)(2) Holders.
There are currently no holders of our common stock, as noted
above.
(a)(3) Dividends.
Following completion of the conversion and related public
offering, our Board of Directors will have the authority to
declare dividends on our common stock, subject to statutory and
regulatory requirements. In the future, our Board intends to
consider a policy of paying cash or stock dividends on the
common stock. However, no decision has been made with respect to
whether or when the payment of dividends may occur. The payment
of dividends will depend upon a number of factors, including
capital requirements, Benjamin Franklin Bancorps and
Benjamin Franklin Banks financial condition and results of
operations, tax considerations, statutory and regulatory
limitations and general economic conditions. No assurances can
be given that any dividends will be paid or that, if paid, will
not be reduced or eliminated in the future.
The only funds available for the payment of dividends on the
capital stock of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp will be cash and cash
equivalents held by Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, dividends paid by
Benjamin Franklin Bank to Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and
borrowings. Benjamin Franklin Bank will be prohibited from
paying cash dividends to Benjamin Franklin Bancorp to the extent
that any such payment would reduce Benjamin Franklin Banks
capital below required capital levels or would impair the
liquidation account to be established for the benefit of
Benjamin Franklin Banks eligible account holders and
supplemental eligible account holders at the time of the
conversion.
FDIC regulations limit Benjamin Franklin Banks ability to
pay dividends to Benjamin Franklin Bancorp under certain
circumstances. For example, Benjamin Franklin Bank could not pay
dividends if it
40
was not in compliance with applicable regulatory capital
requirements. In addition, Massachusetts law provides that
dividends may not be declared, credited or paid by Benjamin
Franklin Bank so long as there is any impairment of capital
stock. No dividend may be declared on Benjamin Franklin
Banks common stock for any period other than for which
dividends are declared upon preferred stock, except as
authorized by the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks. The
approval of the Commissioner is also required for Benjamin
Franklin Bank to declare a dividend, if the total of all
dividends declared by it in any calendar year shall exceed the
total of its net profits for that year combined with its
retained net profits of the preceding two years, less any
required transfer to surplus or a fund for the retirement of any
preferred stock.
|
|
|
|
(a)(4) |
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation
Plans. |
Not applicable.
(b) Not applicable.
(c) Not applicable.
|
|
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
The following tables contain certain information concerning the
consolidated financial position and results of operations of
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp at the dates and for the periods
indicated. This information should be read in conjunction with
the Consolidated Financial Statements of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp, M.H.C. and Subsidiaries and notes thereto appearing in
Item 8 of this Annual Report and Managements
Discussion and Analysis appearing in Item 7 of this Annual
Report. The selected financial data and selected operating data
of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp as of December 31, 2004, 2003
and 2002 and for the years then ended have been derived from
Benjamin Franklin Bancorps consolidated financial
statements which have been audited by Wolf &
Company, P.C., the independent registered public accounting
firm.
The selected financial condition data and selected operating
data of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp at or for the years ended
December 31, 2001 and 2000 have been derived from Benjamin
Franklin Bancorps consolidated financial statements that
have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP. Because Arthur
Andersen has ceased accounting and auditing operations, Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp is unable to obtain written consent of Arthur
Andersen to incorporate their report in this prospectus. Because
Arthur Andersen has not consented to incorporating their report
in this prospectus, investors will not be able to recover
against Arthur Andersen in connection with the use of their
report. In addition, the ability of Arthur Andersen to satisfy
any claims (including claims arising from its provision of
auditing and other services to Benjamin Franklin Bancorp) is
limited as a result of the diminished amount of assets of Arthur
Andersen that are now or may in the future be available to
satisfy claims.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Selected Financial Condition Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
517,393 |
|
|
$ |
458,844 |
|
|
$ |
452,230 |
|
|
$ |
430,084 |
|
|
$ |
443,092 |
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
383,373 |
|
|
|
288,862 |
|
|
|
261,933 |
|
|
|
257,566 |
|
|
|
284,232 |
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
93,262 |
|
|
|
110,254 |
|
|
|
114,728 |
|
|
|
86,136 |
|
|
|
112,884 |
|
Deposits
|
|
|
396,499 |
|
|
|
380,257 |
|
|
|
373,300 |
|
|
|
360,979 |
|
|
|
388,332 |
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,400 |
|
Long-term debt(1)
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
31,328 |
|
|
|
29,301 |
|
|
|
29,814 |
|
|
|
26,937 |
|
|
|
24,794 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Long-term debt includes advances from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Boston and subordinated debt. See
Business Sources of Funds
Borrowings. |
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Selected Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income
|
|
$ |
20,795 |
|
|
$ |
19,532 |
|
|
$ |
21,406 |
|
|
$ |
26,441 |
|
|
$ |
28,064 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
7,032 |
|
|
|
6,752 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
12,397 |
|
|
|
16,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
13,763 |
|
|
|
12,780 |
|
|
|
13,812 |
|
|
|
14,044 |
|
|
|
11,848 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
13,143 |
|
|
|
12,155 |
|
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
13,993 |
|
|
|
11,847 |
|
Non-interest income
|
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
2,990 |
|
|
|
1,285 |
|
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
Gain (loss) on sales of securities, net
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
(2,529 |
) |
|
|
(6,784 |
) |
Non-interest expense
|
|
|
12,686 |
|
|
|
12,724 |
|
|
|
12,115 |
|
|
|
11,565 |
|
|
|
10,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
|
3,139 |
|
|
|
1,651 |
|
|
|
(3,969 |
) |
Income tax expense(1)
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
2,696 |
|
|
$ |
41 |
|
|
$ |
(4,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Refer to Item 7, Managements Discussion and
Analysis, for discussion of changes in income tax expense
for the periods from 2002 forward. For the year ended
December 31, 2000, Benjamin Franklin recorded income tax
expense of $708,000 despite incurring a pre-tax loss. This is
because a valuation allowance was established for a deferred tax
asset associated with an impairment charge we recorded to
reflect unrealized net losses on equity securities. In 2001, the
effective tax rate was unusually high, at 97.5%, because the
valuation allowance was increased by $1.0 million due to
the fact that the capital losses on sales of securities realized
during the year were not deductible for tax purposes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Selected Financial Ratios and Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on assets (ratio of net income to average total assets)
|
|
|
0.34 |
% |
|
|
0.36 |
% |
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
|
(1.09 |
)% |
Return on equity (ratio of net income to average equity)
|
|
|
5.59 |
% |
|
|
5.65 |
% |
|
|
9.45 |
% |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
(16.32 |
)% |
Average interest rate spread(1)
|
|
|
2.63 |
% |
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
3.32 |
% |
|
|
3.30 |
% |
|
|
2.87 |
% |
Net interest margin(2)
|
|
|
3.00 |
% |
|
|
2.98 |
% |
|
|
3.47 |
% |
|
|
3.51 |
% |
|
|
3.57 |
% |
Efficiency ratio(3)
|
|
|
79.09 |
% |
|
|
84.78 |
% |
|
|
75.69 |
% |
|
|
72.84 |
% |
|
|
78.07 |
% |
Non-interest expense to average total assets
|
|
|
2.58 |
% |
|
|
2.73 |
% |
|
|
2.76 |
% |
|
|
2.64 |
% |
|
|
2.53 |
% |
Average interest-earning assets to average interest bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
123.91 |
% |
|
|
114.38 |
% |
|
|
108.04 |
% |
|
|
106.92 |
% |
|
|
88.16 |
% |
Asset Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
Non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
0.09 |
% |
|
|
0.16 |
% |
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
|
|
0.06 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
941.25 |
% |
|
|
544.92 |
% |
|
|
115,600.00 |
% |
|
|
749.68 |
% |
|
|
603.39 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
0.82 |
% |
|
|
0.87 |
% |
|
|
0.88 |
% |
|
|
0.46 |
% |
|
|
0.38 |
% |
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Capital Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity to total assets at end of year
|
|
|
6.05 |
% |
|
|
6.39 |
% |
|
|
6.59 |
% |
|
|
6.26 |
% |
|
|
5.60 |
% |
Average equity to average assets
|
|
|
6.13 |
% |
|
|
6.42 |
% |
|
|
6.49 |
% |
|
|
5.82 |
% |
|
|
6.67 |
% |
|
Risk-based capital ratio (bank only) at end of year
|
|
|
12.26 |
% |
|
|
13.94 |
% |
|
|
13.54 |
% |
|
|
9.65 |
% |
|
|
7.69 |
% |
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of full service offices
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The average interest rate spread represents the difference
between the weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets
and the weighted-average cost of interest-bearing liabilities
for the year. |
|
(2) |
The net interest margin represents net interest income as a
percent of average interest-earning assets for the year. |
|
(3) |
The efficiency ratio represents non-interest expense for the
period minus expenses related to the amortization of intangible
assets divided by the sum of net interest income (before the
loan loss provision) plus non-interest income (excluding net
gains (losses) on sale of bank assets). |
|
|
Item 7. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
This section is intended to help potential investors understand
the financial performance of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and
Benjamin Franklin Bank through a discussion of the factors
affecting our financial condition at December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002 and our consolidated results of operations for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. This section
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements
that appear in Item 8 of this Annual Report. In this
section, we sometimes refer to Benjamin Franklin Bank and
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp together as Benjamin
Franklin since the financial condition and results of
operation of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp closely reflect the
financial condition and results of operation of its sole
operating subsidiary, Benjamin Franklin Bank.
Overview
Income. Benjamin Franklin Bancorps results of
operations are dependent mainly on net interest income, which is
the difference between the income earned on its loan and
investment portfolios and interest expense incurred on its
deposits and borrowed funds. Results of operations are also
affected by fee income from banking and non-banking operations,
provisions for loan losses, gains (losses) on sales of loans and
securities available for sale, loan servicing income and other
miscellaneous income.
Expenses. Benjamin Franklins expenses consist
primarily of compensation and employee benefits, office
occupancy, technology, marketing, general administrative
expenses and income tax expense.
Results of operations are also significantly affected by general
economic and competitive conditions, particularly with respect
to changes in interest rates, government policies and actions of
regulatory authorities. Future changes in applicable law,
regulations or government policies may materially impact
Benjamin Franklins financial condition and results of
operations.
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are those that involve significant
judgments and assessments by management, and which could
potentially result in materially different results under
different assumptions and conditions. Benjamin Franklin
considers the following to be critical accounting policies:
Allowance for Loan Losses. This accounting policy is
considered critical due to the high degree of judgment involved,
the subjectivity of the underlying assumptions used, and the
potential for changes in
43
the economic environment that could result in material changes
in the amount of the allowance for loan losses considered
necessary. The allowance is evaluated on a regular basis by
management and is based on a periodic review of the
collectibility of the loans in light of historical experience,
the nature and size of the loan portfolio, adverse situations
that may affect borrowers ability to repay, the estimated
value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic
conditions. For a full discussion of the allowance for loan
losses, please refer to Business Asset
Quality in Item 1.
Income Taxes. Benjamin Franklin uses the asset and
liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this
method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for
the future tax consequences attributable to differences between
the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. A valuation
allowance related to deferred tax assets is established when, in
managements judgment, it is more likely than not that all
or a portion of such deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Deferred tax assets applicable to capital loss carryforwards
that expire in 2006 are recoverable only to the extent that
capital gains can be realized during the carryforward period.
Accordingly, given Benjamin Franklins limited opportunity
to realize capital gains through the sale of capital assets
within the required timeframe, management has provided a
valuation allowance of $2.3 million against 100% of the
deferred tax assets related to capital loss carryforwards at
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. This valuation allowance
is assessed periodically for recoverability. The judgments
applied by management consider the likelihood that capital gain
income will be realized within the carryforward period in light
of Benjamin Franklins tax planning strategies and changes
in market conditions.
Intangible Assets. Benjamin Franklin considers accounting
for goodwill to be critical because significant judgment is
exercised in performing periodic valuations of this asset, which
arose through the acquisition of Foxboro National Bank. Goodwill
is evaluated for potential impairment on an annual basis as of
each December 31st, or more frequently if events or
circumstances indicate a potential for impairment. At the time
of acquisition, the operations of Foxboro National Bank were
combined with the operations of Benjamin Franklin based on
similar economic characteristics. Accordingly, discrete
financial information is not separately maintained to evaluate
the operating results of the former Foxboro National Bank and,
as a result, in performing a goodwill impairment evaluation,
Benjamin Franklin measures the fair value of the entire company,
rather than that of Foxboro separately. If impairment is
detected, the carrying value of goodwill is reduced through a
charge to earnings. The evaluation of goodwill involves
estimations of discount rates and the timing of projected future
cash flows, which are subject to change with changes in economic
conditions and other factors. Such changes in the assumptions
used to evaluate this intangible asset affect its value and
could have a material adverse impact on Benjamin Franklins
results of operations.
This discussion has highlighted those accounting policies that
management considers to be critical, however all accounting
policies are important, and therefore the reader is encouraged
to review each of the policies included in Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements to gain a better understanding
of how Benjamin Franklins financial performance is
measured and reported.
Analysis of Net Interest Income
Net interest income represents the difference between income on
interest-earning assets and expense on interest-bearing
liabilities. Net interest income also depends upon the relative
amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities and the interest rates earned or paid on them.
44
The following tables set forth average balance sheets, average
yields and costs, and certain other information for the periods
indicated. All average balances are daily average balances.
Non-accrual loans were included in the computation of average
balances, but have been reflected in the table as loans carrying
a zero yield. The yields set forth below include the effect of
deferred fees, discounts and premiums that are amortized or
accreted to interest income or expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
|
|
Yield/ | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
|
|
Yield/ | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
|
|
Yield/ | |
|
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Rate | |
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Rate | |
|
Balance | |
|
Interest | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$ |
338,198 |
|
|
$ |
17,320 |
|
|
|
5.12% |
|
|
$ |
270,342 |
|
|
$ |
15,530 |
|
|
|
5.74% |
|
|
$ |
249,260 |
|
|
$ |
16,322 |
|
|
|
6.55% |
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
107,122 |
|
|
|
3,336 |
|
|
|
3.11% |
|
|
|
122,570 |
|
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
|
2.81% |
|
|
|
89,295 |
|
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
4.67% |
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
|
|
13,367 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
1.04% |
|
|
|
35,293 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
1.56% |
|
|
|
58,980 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
1.56% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
458,687 |
|
|
|
20,795 |
|
|
|
4.53% |
|
|
|
428,205 |
|
|
|
19,532 |
|
|
|
4.56% |
|
|
|
397,535 |
|
|
|
21,406 |
|
|
|
5.38% |
|
Non-interest-earning assets
|
|
|
33,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
492,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
465,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
439,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
$ |
98,753 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
|
0.50% |
|
|
$ |
93,501 |
|
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
0.50% |
|
|
$ |
83,878 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
0.68% |
|
Money market
|
|
|
53,246 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
1.00% |
|
|
|
48,256 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
0.81% |
|
|
|
45,648 |
|
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
1.35% |
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
23,657 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
0.15% |
|
|
|
60,751 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
0.15% |
|
|
|
69,832 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
0.32% |
|
Certificates of deposits
|
|
|
134,034 |
|
|
|
3,305 |
|
|
|
2.47% |
|
|
|
126,856 |
|
|
|
3,538 |
|
|
|
2.79% |
|
|
|
131,073 |
|
|
|
4,451 |
|
|
|
3.40% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
309,690 |
|
|
|
4,366 |
|
|
|
1.41% |
|
|
|
329,364 |
|
|
|
4,487 |
|
|
|
1.36% |
|
|
|
330,431 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
|
1.77% |
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
5,289 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
1.74% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00% |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
55,208 |
|
|
|
2,574 |
|
|
|
4.66% |
|
|
|
45,001 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
5.03% |
|
|
|
37,504 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
4.63% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
370,187 |
|
|
|
7,032 |
|
|
|
1.90% |
|
|
|
374,365 |
|
|
|
6,752 |
|
|
|
1.80% |
|
|
|
367,935 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
2.06% |
|
Non-interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
92,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
462,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
410,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
30,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,537 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$ |
492,525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
465,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
439,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12,780 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.63% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.76% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.32% |
|
Net interest-earning assets(1)
|
|
$ |
88,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
53,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.00% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.98% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.47% |
|
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123.91% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114.38% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108.04% |
|
|
|
(1) |
Net interest-earning assets represents total interest-earning
assets less total interest-bearing liabilities. |
|
(2) |
Net interest margin represents net interest income divided by
average total interest-earning assets. |
|
(3) |
Net interest rate spread represents the difference between the
yield on average interest-earning assets and the cost of average
interest-bearing liabilities at December 31, 2004 and for
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002. |
45
The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in
interest income and interest expense for the major categories of
Benjamin Franklins interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. Information is provided for each
category of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities with respect to (i) changes attributable to
changes in volume (i.e., changes in average balances multiplied
by the prior-period average rate) and (ii) changes
attributable to rate (i.e., changes in average rate multiplied
by prior-period average balances). For purposes of this table,
changes attributable to both rate and volume, which cannot be
segregated, have been allocated proportionately to the change
due to volume and the change due to rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
2003 vs. 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) | |
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) | |
|
|
|
|
Due to | |
|
Total | |
|
Due to | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
| |
|
Increase | |
|
|
Volume | |
|
Rate | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
Volume | |
|
Rate | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$ |
3,898 |
|
|
$ |
(2,108 |
) |
|
$ |
1,790 |
|
|
$ |
1,381 |
|
|
$ |
(2,173 |
) |
|
$ |
(792 |
) |
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
1,552 |
|
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
(716 |
) |
|
Interest-earning deposits
|
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(413 |
) |
|
|
(369 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
3,120 |
|
|
|
(1,857 |
) |
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
2,564 |
|
|
|
(4,438 |
) |
|
|
(1,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
(101 |
) |
|
Money markets
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
Certificates of deposits
|
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(1,297 |
) |
|
|
(1,369 |
) |
|
Short-term borrowings and long-term debt
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
401 |
|
|
|
347 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
(443 |
) |
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
(1,117 |
) |
|
|
(842 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in net interest income
|
|
$ |
2,397 |
|
|
$ |
(1,414 |
) |
|
$ |
983 |
|
|
$ |
2,289 |
|
|
$ |
(3,321 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of Financial Condition At December 31, 2004
and December 31, 2003
Total Assets. Total assets increased by
$58.5 million, or 12.8%, from $458.8 million at
December 31, 2003 to $517.4 million at
December 31, 2004. This increase was largely the result of
an increase in the loan portfolio, offset by reductions in cash,
short-term investments and investment securities.
Cash and Short-term Investments. Cash and correspondent
bank balances decreased by $6.0 million to
$8.7 million as of December 31, 2004 when compared to
December 31, 2003. Over the same period, short-term
investments, comprised of overnight fed funds sold and money
market funds, decreased $15.5 million to $5.5 million
at December 31, 2004. These reductions in short-term
liquidity served primarily to fund increases in Benjamin
Franklin Banks loan portfolio.
Securities. The investment portfolio totaled
$93.3 million at December 31, 2004, a decrease of
$17.0 million, or 15.4%, from $110.3 million at
December 31, 2003. This reduction, caused by net pay-downs
in mortgage-backed securities totaling $25.4 million,
offset by increases in holdings of U.S. federal agency
securities and corporate bonds totaling $3.7 million and
$5.0 million, respectively, was used to fund growth in
Benjamin Franklin Banks loan portfolio.
Net Loans. Net loans as of December 31, 2004 were
$383.4 million, an increase of $94.5 million, or
32.7%, over net loan balances of $288.9 million as of
December 31, 2003. Loan growth occurred in most product
categories, including residential mortgage loans
($69.0 million), commercial real estate
46
($17.3 million), construction ($4.7 million), and
consumer ($5.0 million), offset by a decline in commercial
business loans ($1.2 million). The significant growth in
residential mortgage loans can be attributed to the attractive
rates offered on adjustable-rate mortgages and 15-year bi-weekly
mortgage loans.
Deposits. Deposits increased by $16.2 million to
$396.5 million at December 31, 2004, an increase of
4.3% over balances of $380.3 million at December 31,
2003. The largest increases came in certificates of deposit
($13.9 million), money market accounts ($3.1 million)
and demand accounts ($2.0 million), offset by a decline in
checking accounts ($2.2 million). The deposit increases
overall were the result of Benjamin Franklin Banks
continued marketing and promotional efforts in its market area,
including efforts to remain competitive in all of its deposit
product offerings.
Borrowed Funds. Funds borrowed from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Boston increased by $40.3 million to
$76.3 million at December 31, 2004, a 111.9% increase
over balances of $36.0 million as of December 31,
2003. These additional funds were borrowed in order to fund the
continued growth in the Banks loan portfolio during the
year ended December 31, 2004. The $9.0 million balance
in subordinated debt remained unchanged from December 31,
2003 to December 31, 2004.
Retained Earnings. Retained earnings increased by
$2.0 million to $31.3 million at December 31,
2004, an increase of 6.9% from a balance of $29.3 million
as of December 31, 2003. This change was the result of net
income for the year of $1.7 million and a decline of
$365,000 in the net unrealized loss on marketable securities.
Comparison of Operating Results For The Year Ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003
Net Income. Net income for the year ended
December 31, 2004 was $1,689,000, essentially unchanged
when compared to net income of $1,688,000 for 2003. A $983,000
increase in net interest income in 2004 was almost entirely
offset by a decline in other income of $842,000 and a $110,000
reduction in net gains incurred on sales of securities.
Net Interest Income. Benjamin Franklin Bancorp earned net
interest income of $13.8 million and $12.8 million in
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
The increase between the two periods of $983,000 or 7.7%, is due
to a $30.5 million, or 7.1%, increase in average
interest-earning assets, and to a lesser degree to a
2 basis point, or 0.7%, increase in the net interest
margin. Within earnings assets, higher-yielding loans increased
on average by $67.9 million, while lower-yielding
investment securities and short-term investments declined by
$37.4 million on average. Within Benjamin Franklins
funding liabilities, the mix shifted somewhat in favor of
non-interest bearing accounts, which increased by
$30.7 million on average. This shift was caused primarily
by a change made in Benjamin Franklin Banks primary
checking account product in September 2003, whereby the payment
of interest was eliminated.
Interest Income. Interest income rose $1.3 million,
or 6.5%, to $20.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 from $19.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. The increase was caused primarily
by a $30.5 million increase in average interest-earning
assets, which had the effect of increasing interest income by
$3.2 million. Loans increased on average by
$67.9 million, offset by decreases in the average balances
of investment securities ($15.4 million) and short-term
investments ($21.9 million). Despite the fact that the
average yield on loans declined from 5.74% for the year ended
December 31, 2003 to 5.12% for the same period in 2004, the
overall yield on interest earning assets remained almost
unchanged at 4.56% and 4.53% for 2003 and 2004, respectively,
due to the change in the mix of interest earning assets.
Interest Expense. Interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2004 increased by $280,000, or 4.1%, to
$7.0 million as compared to interest expense of
$6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The
effect of a 10 basis point, or 5.6%, increase in the
average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities was offset in
part by an increase in non-interest-bearing liabilities, which
grew by an average of $30.7 million in the 2004. The
increase in average non-interest-bearing liabilities was
primarily due to a
47
change made in Benjamin Franklin Banks primary checking
account product, which was converted to a non-interest bearing
account in September 2003.
Provision for Loan Losses. Benjamin Franklin records a
provision for loan losses as a charge to its earnings when
necessary in order to maintain the allowance for loan losses at
a level sufficient to absorb potential losses inherent in the
loan portfolio. Refer to Business Asset
Quality for additional information about Benjamin
Franklins methodology for establishing its allowance for
loan losses. Benjamin Franklin recorded $620,000 and $625,000 in
loan loss provisions during the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively. Provisions in both years were
reflective of growth in the loan portfolio, and in the case of
the 2003 period, the recording of net charge-offs of $414,000.
In 2004, net recoveries of $29,000 were realized. At
December 31, 2004, the allowance for loan losses totaled
$3.2 million, or 0.82% of the loan portfolio, compared to
$2.5 million, or 0.87%, of total loans at December 31,
2003.
Non-interest Income. Non-interest income for the year
ended December 31, 2004 declined to $2.1 million, a
reduction of $952,000, or 31.0%, when compared to non-interest
income of $3.1 million during the year ended
December 31, 2003. An $852,000 decline in gains on loan
sales, a $110,000 decrease in gains on sales of securities, an
$82,000 reduction in loan servicing fees and a $46,000 reduction
in deposit service fees were partially offset by an additional
$111,000 in miscellaneous income and a $27,000 increase in
income earned on bank-owned life insurance. The decline in gain
on loan sales was attributable to the rise in market interest
rates in 2004, which in turn caused a decline in the origination
of fixed rate residential mortgage loans that the Bank typically
sells at a small gain in the secondary market. Loan servicing
fee income was also negatively affected by the reduction in
fixed rate loan originations sold with servicing rights
retained. The increase in miscellaneous income in the 2004
period was primarily attributable to an increase in fees earned
on investment product sales, brought about by the addition of a
second sales representative in the fourth quarter of 2003.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense was
essentially unchanged at $12.7 million for the years ended
2004 and 2003. Reductions in occupancy and equipment costs, and
professional fees were offset by an increase in salaries and
employee benefits.
Salaries and employee benefits expenses increased $820,000, or
12.3%, to $7.5 million for the year ended December 31,
2004. The increase was primarily due to normal merit increases
averaging 4.5%, the addition of one senior officer position, and
significantly lower deferral of loan origination costs due to a
lower volume of loan originations in 2004 when compared to 2003.
Occupancy and equipment expenses declined $378,000, or 21.1%, to
$1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Most of this reduction was attributable to a decline in
depreciation expense associated with branch-related capital
expenditures made five years earlier. Professional fees
decreased $611,000, or 62.0%, to $374,000 for the year ended
December 31, 2004, due primarily to a decline in legal
costs and loan origination expenses.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $892,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2004, an increase of $73,000, or
8.9%, compared to $819,000 for the year ended December 31,
2003. The effective tax rates for the 2004 and 2003 years
were 34.6% and 32.7%, respectively, and the increase was due to
additional income in Benjamin Franklin Bank which is taxed at a
higher rate for state tax purposes, and capital losses in 2004
for which Benjamin Franklin Bank received no tax benefit.
Comparison of Financial Condition At December 31, 2003
and December 31, 2002
Total Assets. Total assets increased by
$6.6 million, or 1.5%, from $452.2 million at
December 31, 2002 to $458.8 million at
December 31, 2003. This increase was largely the result of
an increase in the loan portfolio, offset by a reduction in
investment securities.
Cash and Short-term Investments. While cash and
correspondent bank balances remained essentially the same from
year to year, short-term investments consisting of overnight fed
funds sold and money market funds declined by $16.9 million
to $21.0 million at December 31, 2003. This reduction
in short-term liquidity served primarily to fund an increase in
the loan portfolio.
48
Securities. The investment portfolio aggregated
$103.0 million at December 31, 2003, a decline of
$6.5 million, or 5.9%, from $109.5 million at
December 31, 2002. Within the securities portfolio,
decreases in U.S. Treasury and Agency securities
($37.2 million) and other bonds and obligations
($14.5 million), offset by a $45.3 million increase in
holdings of mortgage-backed securities, were used to fund
increases in the Banks loan portfolio. The change in the
securities portfolio mix is due to the more favorable yields
available on mortgage-backed securities of like duration.
Net Loans. Net loans as of December 31, 2003 were
$288.9 million, an increase of $26.9 million, or
10.3%, over net loan balances of $261.9 million as of
December 31, 2002. Most loan product categories increased
during this period, including residential ($7.1 million),
commercial real estate ($17.3 million), construction
($2.9 million), and consumer ($0.7 million). In 2003,
Benjamin Franklin had its highest level of new loan activity to
date, with total originations of $246.9 million, the
product of its ability to offer competitive, attractive interest
rates resulting from a historically low interest rate
environment. Of that amount, $96.3 million of fixed rate
loan originations were sold in the secondary market, with
servicing rights retained. The low interest rate environment
also brought significant refinancing activity, which resulted in
total loan repayments and prepayments of $149.6 million
during 2003.
Deposits and Borrowed Funds. Deposits increased slightly,
by 1.9% or $7.0 million, to $380.2 million at
December 31, 2003 from $373.3 million at
December 31, 2002. A modest shift in the mix of deposits
occurred with increases in savings accounts ($8.6 million)
and money market accounts ($5.9 million), offset by net
reductions in demand deposits and NOW accounts
($6.4 million) and certificates of deposit
($1.2 million). Funds borrowed from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Boston remained unchanged from
December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2003, at
$36 million. The balance of subordinated debt also remained
unchanged year over year, at $9.0 million.
Retained Earnings. Retained earnings declined by
$0.5 million to $29.3 million at December 31,
2003, a decrease of 1.7% from a balance of $29.8 million as
of December 31, 2002. This change was the result of net
income for the year of $1.7 million, offset by an increase
in the net unrealized loss on marketable securities of
$2.2 million.
Comparison of Operating Results For The Years Ended
December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002
Net Income. Net income declined $1.0 million, or
37.4%, to $1.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2003 compared to $2.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2002. The decrease was primarily the result of
a reduction in net interest income, an increase in operating
expenses, an increase in income taxes, offset in part by an
increase in other income and a reduction in the provision for
loan losses.
Net Interest Income. The tables on pages 50 and 51
set forth the components of Benjamin Franklins net
interest income, yields on interest earning assets and interest
bearing liabilities, and the effect on net interest income
arising from changes in volume and rate.
Benjamin Franklin earned net interest income of
$12.8 million and $13.8 million in the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decline
between the two periods of $1.0 million, or 7.5%, was
caused by a 49 basis point, or 14.1%, reduction in the net
interest margin, which had the effect of reducing net interest
income by $3.3 million. This was offset in part by an
increase in the volume of interest-earning assets, which grew by
$30.7 million, or 7.7%, in 2003 as compared to 2002, which
served to increase net interest income by $2.3 million.
Interest Income. Interest income declined
$1.9 million, or 8.8%, to $19.5 million for 2003 from
$21.4 million for the prior year. The decrease was due to
lower average yields on loans and investment securities, which
was offset in part by higher average balances in both asset
classes. In 2003 as compared to 2002, the yield earned on loans
declined by 81 basis points, or 12.4%, to 5.74%, a change
that reflected the drop in market interest rates generally in
2003. Offsetting this to some degree was an increase in loans
outstanding, which grew by $21.1 million, or 8.5%.
Consistent with the lower interest rate environment in 2003,
yields on investments securities also dropped significantly when
compared to 2002, falling by
49
186 basis points to 2.81% for the 2003 year. A
$9.6 million net increase in the average balances of
investment securities and short-term investments in 2003
partially offset the decline in yields.
Interest Expense. Interest expense declined $842,000, or
11.1%, to $6.8 million for the year ended December 31,
2003 from $7.6 million in the prior year. The primary cause
was a reduction in the rates paid on interest-bearing deposit
accounts, which declined by 41 basis points, or 23.2%, to
1.36% for 2003 from 1.77% for 2002. The drop in deposit rates
reflected the lower interest rate environment generally in 2003
as compared to 2002. The average balances of deposits and
short-term Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston borrowings were
virtually unchanged from year to year, while the average balance
of long-term debt including subordinated debt increased by
$7.5 million to an average of $45.0 million for 2003
from $37.5 million for 2002. The effect of the increase in
this item, which paid rates equivalent to 5.03% and 4.63% for
2003 and 2002, respectively, was to increase interest expense by
$527,000.
Provision for Loan Losses. Benjamin Franklins
provision for loan losses decreased by $787,000, or 55.7%, to
$625,000 in 2003 from $1.4 million in 2002. Contributing to
the higher level of provision in 2002 was the creation of a
specific reserve in the amount of $250,000 for a non-performing
loan with an outstanding balance of $462,000 at
December 31, 2002. This loan was charged-off in its
entirety in 2003. Further, in 2002 management decided to
increase general reserve levels for the portfolio as a whole
after a thorough reevaluation of the Banks methodology for
establishing the allowance for loan losses. This analysis
considered economic conditions, peer comparisons and
managements estimate of losses inherent in the portfolio,
and resulted in increases in general reserves for commercial
real estate, commercial business and home equity loans. Also
affecting the provisions for 2003 and 2002 were net charge-offs
aggregating $414,000 and $277,000, respectively. The allowance
for loan losses of $2.5 million at December 31, 2003
represented 0.87% of total loans, essentially unchanged when
compared to 0.88% at December 31, 2002.
Non-interest Income. Total non-interest income was
$3.1 million in 2003, an increase of $222,000, or 7.8% from
$2.9 million for 2002. The increase was primarily the
result of a $904,000 rise in gains realized on sales of fixed
rate residential mortgage loans sold in the secondary market and
the fact that a $741,000 loss realized on the curtailment of the
Banks pension plan was recognized in 2002, offset in part
by a $1.5 million reduction in net gains realized on sales
of investment securities. Also contributing to the change
between years were a $189,000 decline in loan servicing fees and
an increase of $180,000 in other income. The decrease in loan
servicing fees was primarily the result of accelerated
amortization of mortgage servicing rights due to accelerated
principal payments caused by a reduction in market interest
rates. The increase in other income was primarily caused by a
$50,000 increase in fees earned on investment product sales due
to the addition of a second sales representative during 2003 and
a $125,000 increase in income from $1.3 million of BOLI
contracts Benjamin Franklin purchased in the second half of 2003.
Non-interest Expense. Non-interest expense increased
$609,000, or 5.0%, to $12.7 million in 2003 as compared to
$12.1 million in 2002. The largest increases occurred in
salaries and benefits and professional fees, offset partially by
a reduction in other general and administrative expenses.
Salaries and employee benefits expenses increased $518,000, or
8.4%, to $6.7 million for the year ended December 31,
2003. Normal merit increases averaging 4.8% accounted for over
half of this difference, supplemented by increases in retirement
costs, medical insurance costs and an increase in the incentive
bonus plan. Professional fees increased $262,000 or 36.2%, to
$985,000 for 2003. This increase was caused primarily by
increases in legal fees and loan origination costs. Other
general and administrative expenses fell $223,000, or 10.8%, to
$1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Contributing to this decline were reductions in fees paid to
Board members, the result of fewer meetings in 2003 than 2002,
and a drop in supplies expense as the Bank negotiated more
favorable terms with its primary supplies vendor.
Income Taxes. Income tax expense was $819,000 for the
year ended December 31, 2003 an increase of $376,000, or
84.9%, compared to $443,000 for the year ended December 31,
2002. The effective tax rate was 32.7% in 2003 compared to 14.1%
in 2002. The effective tax rate was unusually low in 2002 due to
a
50
$524,000 reduction in the deferred tax asset valuation
allowance, a reduction made possible by the capital gain income
realized on the sale of investment securities during the year.
Losses and Regulatory Action Arising from Equity Investments
in 1999 and 2000
Benjamin Franklin Bank entered into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) in June 2001 in response to regulatory
concerns over equity investments made by the Bank under prior
management in 1999 and 2000. The MOU was lifted in October 2002.
In February 2001, the FDIC informed the Bank that both the size
and concentration of its equity securities portfolio exceeded
regulatory limits. The FDIC found that the $36 million
equity securities portfolio at March 31, 2000 represented
154.0% of the Banks Tier 1 capital, and that
technology stocks comprised approximately 50.0% of the total.
The FDIC ordered Benjamin Franklin Bank to immediately cease
equity investment activities and to liquidate the remaining
equity securities in its portfolio. In March 2001, Benjamin
Franklin Bank sold a substantial portion of its equity
portfolio, resulting in an aggregate loss of $15.2 million.
On this basis, Benjamin Franklin Bancorp determined that an
other-than-temporary impairment existed with regard to certain
equity securities in its portfolio as of December 31, 2000,
and recorded an impairment charge of $11.4 million in the
year ended December 31, 2000. After giving effect to the
impairment charge and the net losses recognized upon the
liquidation of the equity securities portfolio, partially offset
by net gains on sales of other investment securities, Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp reported a net loss of $4.7 million for
the year ended December 31, 2000, and net income of only
$41,000 for the year ended December 31, 2001.
In June 2001, the Board of Directors of Benjamin Franklin Bank
entered into an MOU with the FDIC and the Massachusetts
Commissioner of Banks. The significant provisions of the MOU
required the Board to evaluate its management team using an
independent consultant, to prepare a management and staffing
plan, and to retain qualified management consistent with such
plan. The MOU also prohibited the Bank from purchasing any
equity security without regulatory approval, called for a profit
plan and revisions to the Banks liquidity and funds
management policy, and required an increase in Tier 1
capital to at least 7.0%.
In February 2002, the Banks former president retired, and
the Board hired Thomas R. Venables as President and CEO. In
October 2002, the FDIC and the Commissioner lifted the MOU in
recognition of the substantial progress the Bank had made in
satisfying its terms, and the Board of Directors adopted a Board
Resolution addressing the matters remaining to be resolved. In
July 2003, the Banks former Executive Vice President and
Treasurer resigned. In August 2003, the FDIC and the
Commissioner allowed the Board to rescind the Board Resolution,
as all of the terms of the Resolution and the previous MOU had
been satisfied.
Off-Balance-Sheet Arrangements
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp does not have any off-balance-sheet
arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a
current or future effect on its financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures
or capital resources that is material to investors.
Impact of Inflation and Changing Prices
The financial statements, accompanying notes, and related
financial data of Benjamin Franklin presented herein have been
prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, which require the measurement of financial position
and operating results in terms of historical dollar amounts
without considering the changes in the relative purchasing power
of money over time due to inflation. The impact of inflation is
reflected in the increased cost of Benjamin Franklin operations.
Most of Benjamin Franklins assets and liabilities are
monetary in nature, and therefore the impact of interest rates
has a greater impact on its performance than do the effects of
general levels of inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily
move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices
of goods and services.
51
Impact of Recent Accounting Standards
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Interpretation (FIN) No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities.
FIN 46 requires a variable interest entity to be
consolidated by a company if that company is subject to a
majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest
entitys activities or is entitled to receive a majority of
the entitys residual returns, or both. FIN 46 also
requires disclosures about variable interest entities that a
company is not required to consolidate, but in which it has a
significant variable interest. On December 17, 2003, the
FASB revised FIN 46 and deferred the effective date of
FIN 46 to no later than the end of the first reporting
period that ends after March 15, 2004. The adoption of
FIN 46 and Interpretation No. 46R did not have a
material effect on Benjamin Franklins financial statements.
In March 2004, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 105, Application of Accounting
Principles to Loan Commitments, which provides
guidance regarding loan commitments that are accounted for as
derivative instruments. In this SAB, the SEC determined that an
interest rate lock commitment should generally be valued at zero
at inception. The rate locks will continue to be adjusted for
changes in value resulting from changes in market interest
rates. This SAB did not have any effect on Benjamin Franklin
Bancorps financial position or results of operations.
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment,
which is an amendment of FASB Statement Nos. 123 and 95.
SFAS No. 123R changes, among other things, the manner
in which share-based compensation, such as stock options, will
be accounted for by both public and non-public companies, and
will be effective as of the beginning of the first interim or
annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005.
For public companies, the cost of employee services received in
exchange for equity instruments including options and restricted
stock awards generally will be measured at fair value at the
grant date. The grant date fair value will be estimated using
option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of
those options and instruments, unless observable market prices
for the same or similar options are available. The cost will be
recognized over the requisite service period, often the vesting
period, and will be re-measured subsequently at each reporting
date through settlement date.
On September 30, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 03-1-1 delaying the effective date of
paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments, which provides guidance for determining
the meaning of other-than-temporarily impaired and
its application to certain debt and equity securities within the
scope of SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and
investments accounted for under the cost method. The guidance
requires that investments which have declined in value due to
credit concerns or solely due to changes in interest rates must
be recorded as other-than-temporarily impaired unless the Bank
can assert and demonstrate its intention to hold the security
for a period of time sufficient to allow for a recovery of fair
value up to or beyond the cost of the investment which might
mean maturity. The delay of the effective date of EITF 03-1
will be superseded concurrent with the final issuance of
proposed FSP Issue 03-1-a. Proposed FSP Issue 03-1-a
is intended to provide implementation guidance with respect to
all securities analyzed for impairment under
paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1. Management continues to
closely monitor and evaluate how the provisions of
EITF 03-1 and proposed FSP Issue 03-1-a will affect
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp.
|
|
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk |
Management and the Board of Benjamin Franklin recognize that
taking and managing risk is fundamental to the business of
banking. Through the development, implementation and monitoring
of its policies with respect to risk management, the Bank
strives to measure, evaluate and control the risks it faces. The
Board and management understand that an effective risk
management system is critical to the safety and soundness of the
Bank. Chief among the risks faced by Benjamin Franklin are
credit risk, market risk including interest rate risk, liquidity
risk, operational (transaction) risk and compliance risk.
52
Within management, the responsibility for risk management rests
with the Risk Management Committee, chaired by the Compliance
and Risk Management Officer. Other members of the Committee
include the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer, and the senior officers responsible for lending,
retail banking and human resources. The Risk Management
Committee meets on a monthly basis to review the status of the
Companys risk management efforts, including reviews of
internal and external audit findings, loan review findings, and
the activities of the Asset/ Liability Committee with respect to
monitoring interest rate and liquidity risk. The Committee
tracks any open items requiring corrective action with the goal
of ensuring that each is addressed on a timely basis. The
Compliance and Risk Management Officer reports all findings of
the Risk Management Committee directly to the Boards Audit
and Risk Management Committee.
Management of Credit Risk. Benjamin Franklin considers
credit risk to be the most significant risk it faces, in that it
has the greatest potential to affect the financial condition and
operating results of the Bank. Credit risk is managed through a
combination of policies established by the Board, the monitoring
of compliance with these policies, and the periodic evaluation
of loans in the portfolio, including those with problem
characteristics. In general, Benjamin Franklins policies
establish maximums on the amount of credit that may be granted
to a single borrower (including affiliates), the aggregate
amount of loans outstanding by type in relation to total assets
and capital, and loan concentrations. Collateral and debt
service coverage ratios, approval limits and other underwriting
criteria are also specified. Policies also exist with respect to
performing periodic credit reviews, the rating of loans, when
loans should be placed on non-performing status and factors that
should be considered in establishing the Banks allowance
for loan losses. For additional information, refer to
Business Lending Activities.
Management of Market Risk. Market risk is the risk of
loss due to adverse changes in market prices and rates, and
typically encompasses exposures such as sensitivity to changes
in market interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and
commodity prices. Benjamin Franklin has no exposure to foreign
currency exchange or commodity price movements. Because net
interest income is Benjamin Franklins primary source of
revenue, interest rate risk is a significant market risk to
which the Bank is exposed.
Interest rate risk is the exposure of Benjamin Franklins
net interest income to adverse movements in interest rates. Net
interest income is affected by changes in interest rates as well
as by fluctuations in the level and duration of Benjamin
Franklins assets and liabilities. Over and above the
influence that interest rates have on net interest income,
changes in rates may also affect the volume of lending activity,
the ability of borrowers to repay variable rate loans, the
volume of loan prepayments and refinancings, the flow and mix of
deposits, and the market value of the Banks assets and
liabilities.
Exposure to interest rate risk is managed by Benjamin Franklin
through periodic evaluations of the current interest rate risk
inherent in its rate-sensitive assets and liabilities, coupled
with determinations of the level of risk considered appropriate
given the Banks capital and liquidity requirements,
business strategy, and performance objectives. Through such
management, Benjamin Franklin seeks to reduce the vulnerability
of its net interest income to changes in interest rates.
Strategies used by Benjamin Franklin to reduce the potential
volatility of its earnings include:
|
|
|
|
|
Emphasizing the origination and retention of adjustable-rate
mortgage loans, variable rate commercial loans and variable rate
home equity lines-of-credit; |
|
|
|
Investing in securities with relatively short maturities and/or
expected average lives; |
|
|
|
Classifying nearly all of the investment portfolio as
available for sale in order to provide for
flexibility in liquidity management. |
Benjamin Franklins Asset/ Liability Committee, comprised
of several members of senior and middle management, is
responsible for managing interest rate risk. On a quarterly
basis, the Committee reviews with the Board of Directors its
analysis of the Banks exposure to interest rate risk, the
effect subsequent changes in interest rates could have on the
Banks future net interest income, its strategies and other
activities, and the effect of those strategies on Benjamin
Franklins operating results. The Committee is
53
also actively involved in the Banks planning and budgeting
process as well as in determining pricing strategies for
deposits and loans.
The Committees primary method for measuring and evaluating
interest rate risk is income simulation analysis. This analysis
considers the maturity and repricing characteristics of assets
and liabilities, as well as the relative sensitivities of these
balance sheet components over a range of interest rate
scenarios. Interest rate scenarios tested generally include
instantaneous rate shocks, rate ramps over a one year period,
and static (or flat) rates. The simulation analysis is used to
measure the exposure of net interest income to changes in
interest rates over a specified time horizon, usually a two year
period.
The table below sets forth, as of December 31, 2004, the
estimated changes in Benjamin Franklins net interest
income that would result from the designated instantaneous
changes in the U.S. Treasury yield curve. Computations of
prospective effects of hypothetical interest rate changes are
based on numerous assumptions including relative levels of
market interest rates, loan prepayments and deposit decay, and
should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Change in Estimated | |
|
|
Net Interest Income | |
|
|
Over 12 Months | |
|
|
| |
300 basis point increase in rates
|
|
|
(4.67 |
)% |
200 basis point increase in rates
|
|
|
(2.56 |
)% |
100 basis point increase in rates
|
|
|
.21 |
% |
Flat interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
100 basis point decrease in rates
|
|
|
(1.36 |
)% |
As indicated in the table above, the result of an immediate
100 basis point increase in interest rates is estimated to
increase net interest income by .21% over a 12-month horizon,
when compared to the flat rate scenario. For an immediate
200 basis point parallel increase in the level of interest
rates, net interest income is estimated to decline by 2.56% over
a 12-month horizon, when compared against the flat rate
scenario. Inherent in these estimates is the assumption that
transaction and savings account deposit rates would only
increase by 25 basis points and that money market deposit
account rates would only increase by 75 basis points for
each 100 basis point increase in market interest rates.
These assumptions are based on the Banks past experience
with the changes in rates paid on these non-maturity deposits
coincident with changes in market interest rates.
The estimated change in net interest income from the flat rate
scenario for a 100 basis point decline in the level of
interest rates is a decrease of 1.36%, which assumes no decrease
in interest-bearing checking rates, a 50 basis point
decrease in savings rates and an average decrease in money
market rates of only 57 basis points. Effectively, in the
declining interest rate scenario, Benjamin Franklin Bank does
not reap the full potential benefit of lower rates because its
core deposit accounts are either already at their effective
floors or reach those floors without giving full effect to the
rate decline.
There are inherent shortcomings in income simulation, given the
number and variety of assumptions that must be made in
performing the analysis. The assumptions relied upon in making
these calculations of interest rate sensitivity include the
level of market interest rates, the shape of the yield curve,
the degree to which certain assets and liabilities with similar
maturities or periods to repricing react to changes in market
interest rates, the degree to which non-maturity deposits react
to changes in market rates, the expected prepayment rates on
loans and mortgage-backed securities, the degree to which early
withdrawals occur on certificates of deposit and the volume of
other deposit flows. As such, although the analysis shown above
provides an indication of Benjamin Franklins sensitivity
to interest rate changes at a point in time, these estimates are
not intended to and do not provide a precise forecast of the
effect of changes in market interest rates on Benjamin
Franklins net interest income and will differ from actual
results
In its management of interest rate risk, Benjamin Franklin also
relies on the analysis of its interest rate gap,
which is the measure of the mismatch between the amount of
Benjamin Franklins interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities that mature or reprice within
specified timeframes. An asset-
54
sensitive position (positive gap) exists when there are more
rate-sensitive assets than rate-sensitive liabilities maturing
or repricing within a particular time horizon, and generally
signifies a favorable effect on net interest income during
periods of rising interest rates and a negative effect during
periods of falling interest rates. Conversely, a
liability-sensitive position (negative gap) would generally
indicate a negative effect on net interest income during periods
of rising rates and a positive effect during periods of falling
rates.
The table below shows Benjamin Franklins interest
sensitivity gap position as of December 31, 2004,
indicating the amount of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities that are anticipated to mature or
reprice in each of the future time periods shown. Generally,
these assets and liabilities are shown in the table based on the
earlier of the time remaining to repricing or contractual
maturity. However, residential mortgage loans and
mortgage-backed securities have been presented in a manner that
also incorporates the estimated effects of prepayment
assumptions. Interest-bearing checking, savings and money market
deposit accounts are assumed to have annual rates of withdrawal
(decay rates) of 12.7%, 46.1% and 47.7%, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than | |
|
More than | |
|
More than | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than | |
|
Two Years | |
|
Three Years | |
|
Four Years | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Up to | |
|
One Year to | |
|
to Three | |
|
to Four | |
|
to Five | |
|
More than | |
|
|
|
|
One Year | |
|
Two Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
Five Years | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest-earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$ |
162,414 |
|
|
$ |
47,694 |
|
|
$ |
63,598 |
|
|
$ |
34,602 |
|
|
$ |
39,176 |
|
|
$ |
37,578 |
|
|
$ |
385,062 |
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
28,115 |
|
|
|
22,136 |
|
|
|
9,899 |
|
|
|
5,421 |
|
|
|
3,083 |
|
|
|
26,447 |
|
|
|
95,101 |
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
5,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
196,042 |
|
|
|
69,830 |
|
|
|
73,497 |
|
|
|
40,023 |
|
|
|
42,259 |
|
|
|
64,025 |
|
|
|
485,676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
44,133 |
|
|
|
23,788 |
|
|
|
12,822 |
|
|
|
6,911 |
|
|
|
3,725 |
|
|
|
4,496 |
|
|
|
95,875 |
|
Money market
|
|
|
25,361 |
|
|
|
13,264 |
|
|
|
6,937 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
2,080 |
|
|
|
53,167 |
|
NOW accounts
|
|
|
2,852 |
|
|
|
2,490 |
|
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
1,898 |
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
11,389 |
|
|
|
22,460 |
|
Certificates of deposits
|
|
|
99,682 |
|
|
|
24,968 |
|
|
|
7,532 |
|
|
|
4,612 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137,221 |
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
176,278 |
|
|
|
71,510 |
|
|
|
61,464 |
|
|
|
23,049 |
|
|
|
13,706 |
|
|
|
47,966 |
|
|
|
393,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate sensitivity gap
|
|
$ |
19,764 |
|
|
$ |
(1,680 |
) |
|
$ |
12,033 |
|
|
$ |
16,974 |
|
|
$ |
28,553 |
|
|
$ |
16,059 |
|
|
$ |
91,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate sensitivity gap as a % of total assets
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
(0.32 |
)% |
|
|
2.32 |
% |
|
|
3.28 |
% |
|
|
5.51 |
% |
|
|
3.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap
|
|
$ |
19,764 |
|
|
$ |
18,084 |
|
|
$ |
30,116 |
|
|
$ |
47,091 |
|
|
$ |
75,644 |
|
|
$ |
91,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative interest rate sensitivity gap as a % of total assets
|
|
|
3.82 |
% |
|
|
3.49 |
% |
|
|
5.81 |
% |
|
|
9.09 |
% |
|
|
14.60 |
% |
|
|
17.71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Certain factors may serve to limit the usefulness of the
measurement of the interest rate gap. For example, interest
rates on certain assets and liabilities are discretionary and
may change in advance of, or
55
may lag behind, changes in market rates. The gap analysis does
not give effect to changes Benjamin Franklin may undertake to
mitigate interest rate risk. Certain assets, such as
adjustable-rate loans, have features that may restrict the
magnitude of changes in interest rates both on a short-term
basis and over the life of the assets. Further, in the event of
changes in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal
levels would likely deviate significantly from those assumed in
the gap analysis. Lastly, should interest rates increase, the
ability of borrowers to service their debt may decrease.
Liquidity Risk Management. Liquidity risk, or the risk to
earnings and capital arising from an organizations
inability to meet its obligations without incurring unacceptable
losses, is managed by Benjamin Franklins Treasurer, who
monitors on a daily basis the adequacy of Benjamin
Franklins liquidity position. Oversight is provided by the
Asset/ Liability Committee, which reviews Benjamin
Franklins liquidity on a weekly basis, and by the Board of
Directors, which reviews the adequacy of Benjamin
Franklins liquidity resources on a monthly basis.
Benjamin Franklins primary sources of funds are from
deposits, amortization of loans, loan prepayments and the
maturity of loans, mortgage-backed securities and other
investments, and other funds provided by operations. While
scheduled payments from amortization of loans and
mortgage-backed securities and maturing loans and investment
securities are relatively predictable sources of funds, deposit
flows and loan prepayments can be greatly influenced by general
interest rates, economic conditions and competition. Benjamin
Franklin maintains excess funds in cash and short-term
interest-bearing assets that provide additional liquidity. At
December 31, 2004, cash and due from banks, short-term
investments and debt securities maturing within one year totaled
$33.8 million or 6.5% of total assets.
Benjamin Franklin also relies on outside borrowings from the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, as an additional funding
source. In 2004, Benjamin Franklin has expanded its use of
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston borrowings to fund growth
in the loan portfolio and to assist in the management of its
interest rate risk. Since December 31, 2003, Benjamin
Franklin has increased Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston
borrowings by $40.3 million to a total of
$76.3 million outstanding as of December 31, 2004. On
that date, Benjamin Franklin had the ability to borrow an
additional $89.1 million from the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Boston.
Benjamin Franklin uses its liquidity to fund existing and future
loan commitments, to fund maturing certificates of deposit and
borrowings, to fund other deposit withdrawals, to invest in
other interest-earning assets and to meet operating expenses.
Benjamin Franklin anticipates that it will continue to have
sufficient funds and alternative funding sources to meet its
current commitments.
Contractual Obligations. The following tables present
information indicating various contractual obligations and
commitments of Benjamin Franklin as of the dates indicated and
the respective maturity dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
More than | |
|
More than | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year | |
|
Three | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One | |
|
through | |
|
Years | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year or | |
|
Three | |
|
through | |
|
Over Five | |
|
|
Total | |
|
Less | |
|
Years | |
|
Five Years | |
|
Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston Advances(1)
|
|
$ |
76,250 |
|
|
$ |
4,250 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
Other(2)
|
|
|
4,458 |
|
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
2,277 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$ |
89,708 |
|
|
$ |
5,441 |
|
|
$ |
32,277 |
|
|
$ |
12,990 |
|
|
$ |
39,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Secured under a blanket security agreement on qualifying assets,
principally 1-4 Family Residential mortgage loans. Advances
shown with a maturity of greater than three years may be called
by the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston during the period
remaining to maturity. |
|
(2) |
Represents contracts for technology services and employee
compensation. |
56
Loan Commitments. The following tables present
certain information about Benjamin Franklin Banks loan
commitments outstanding as of the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
More than | |
|
More than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year | |
|
Three Years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year | |
|
through | |
|
through |
|
Over | |
|
|
Total | |
|
or Less | |
|
Three Years | |
|
Five Years |
|
Five Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Commitments to grant loans(1)
|
|
$ |
15,470 |
|
|
$ |
15,470 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Commercial loan lines-of-credit
|
|
|
4,391 |
|
|
|
4,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unused portion of home equity loans(2)
|
|
|
28,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,260 |
|
Unused portion of construction loans(3)
|
|
|
20,338 |
|
|
|
19,314 |
|
|
|
1,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unused portion of personal lines-of-credit(4)
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loan commitments
|
|
$ |
70,589 |
|
|
$ |
39,175 |
|
|
$ |
1,024 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General: Commitments to extend credit are agreements to
lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any
condition established in the contract and generally have fixed
expiration date or other termination clauses.
|
|
(1) |
Commitments for loans are extended to customers for up to
180 days after which they expire. |
|
(2) |
Unused portions of home equity loans are available to the
borrower for up to 10 years. |
|
(3) |
Unused portions of construction loans are available to the
borrower for up to two years for development loans and up to one
year for other construction loans. |
|
(4) |
Unused portion of checking overdraft lines-of-credit are
available to customers in good standing indefinitely. |
Management of Other Risks. Two additional risk areas that
receive significant attention by management and the Board are
operational risk and compliance risk. Operational risk is the
risk to earnings and capital arising from control deficiencies,
problems with information systems, fraud, error or unforeseen
catastrophes. Compliance risk is the risk arising from
violations of, or nonconformance with, laws, rules, regulations,
prescribed practices, internal policies and procedures or
ethical standards. Compliance risk can expose the Company to
fines, civil money penalties, payment of damages and the voiding
of contracts.
Benjamin Franklin addresses such risks through the establishment
of comprehensive policies and procedures with respect to
internal control, the management and operation of its
information and communication systems, disaster recovery, and
compliance with laws, regulations and banking best
practice. Monitoring of the efficacy of such policies and
procedures is performed through a combination of Benjamin
Franklins internal audit program, through periodic
internal and third-party compliance reviews, and through the
ongoing attention of its managers charged with supervising
compliance and operational control. Oversight of these
activities is provided by the Risk Management Committee and the
Audit and Risk Management Committee of the Board.
|
|
Item 8. |
Financial Statements |
The Consolidated Financial Statements of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp begin on page F-1 of this Annual Report.
|
|
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
Not applicable.
57
|
|
Item 9A. |
Controls and Procedures |
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. Our President and Chief Executive Officer, our
Chief Financial Officer, and other members of our senior
management team have evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on such evaluation,
our President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report,
were adequate and effective to provide reasonable assurance that
information required to be disclosed by the Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp, including our consolidated subsidiaries, in reports
that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods
specified in the Commissions rules and forms.
The effectiveness of a system of disclosure controls and
procedures is subject to various inherent limitations, including
cost limitations, judgments used in decision making, assumptions
about the likelihood of future events, the soundness of internal
controls, and fraud. Due to such inherent limitations, there can
be no assurance that any system of disclosure controls and
procedures will be successful in preventing all errors or fraud,
or in making all material information known in a timely manner
to the appropriate levels of management.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial
Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control
over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal
year 2004 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal controls over
financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B. |
Other Information |
Not applicable.
PART III
|
|
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
Directors of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp
The Board of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp (which is now known as
the Board of Trustees but will be renamed the Board of Directors
upon the completion of the conversion) currently consists of
11 members, each of whom belongs to one of three classes.
Directors serve three-year staggered terms so that only
approximately one-third of the Directors will be elected at each
annual meeting of stockholders. Upon the completion of the Chart
Bank acquisition, six directors from Chart Bank will join the
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp Board of Directors, as described
below. These six directors will be classified evenly, to the
extent practicable, into each of the three Board classes. Each
of the directors of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp also serves as a
director of Benjamin Franklin Bank. Following the completion of
the Chart Bank acquisition, each of the six newly added Bancorp
directors will also join the Board of Directors of Benjamin
Franklin Bank.
58
The following table sets forth the current Directors
names, ages as of March 15, 2005, the years when they began
serving as Directors, and when their current term expires.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name(1) |
|
Age |
|
Date Elected(2) |
|
Term Expires |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dr. Mary Ambler
|
|
72 |
|
1977 |
|
2008 |
William P. Bissonnette
|
|
59 |
|
1997 |
|
2006 |
William F. Brady, Jr., D.D.S.
|
|
72 |
|
1985 |
|
2007 |
John C. Fuller
|
|
72 |
|
1998 |
|
2007 |
Anne M. King
|
|
75 |
|
1997 |
|
2006 |
Richard D. Mann
|
|
69 |
|
1967 |
|
2007 |
John D. Murphy
|
|
75 |
|
1984 |
|
2006 |
Charles F. Oteri
|
|
59 |
|
1984 |
|
2008 |
Thomas R. Venables
|
|
49 |
|
2002 |
|
2008 |
Alfred H. Wahlers
|
|
71 |
|
1973 |
|
2007 |
Charles Yergatian
|
|
76 |
|
1980 |
|
2006 |
|
|
(1) |
In addition to the Directors set forth in this table, six
members of Chart Banks board of directors will be
appointed to the Benjamin Franklin Bancorp Board of Directors
upon completion of the Chart Bank acquisition: Richard E.
Bolton, Jr., Paul E. Capasso, Jonathan A. Haynes, Daniel F.
OBrien, Donald P. Quinn, and Neil E. Todreas. |
|
(2) |
Date Elected indicates the date the Director first
joined the Board of Trustees or Board of Directors of Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp or Benjamin Franklin Bank. |
The principal occupation and business experience for the last
five years for each of Benjamin Franklin Bancorps
Directors is set forth below. All Directors have held their
present positions for five years unless otherwise stated.
Dr. Mary Ambler is a retired physician and a
Professor Emeritus of Brown University.
William P. Bissonnette is a partner in the firm of
Little & Bissonnette, CPAs.
William F. Brady, Jr., D.D.S. is a retired dentist.
John C. Fuller is retired. He was formerly a Vice
President and member of the Board of Directors of the Foxboro
Company, a controls and instrumentation company located in
Foxboro, Massachusetts.
Anne M. King, Clerk of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and
Benjamin Franklin Bank, is a retired journalist and currently
works part-time in public relations.
Richard D. Mann is an owner of Buckley & Mann,
Inc., a textile manufacturer located in Norfolk, Massachusetts.
He also serves as a member of the Board of Trustees of
Clark-Cutler-McDermott Co. of Franklin, Massachusetts and of
Draper Knitting Co. of Canton, Massachusetts.
John D. Murphy is self-employed in the field of real
estate.
Charles F. Oteri is the Chief Executive Officer and
Funeral Director of Oteri Funeral Home in Franklin,
Massachusetts.
Thomas R. Venables has served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and Benjamin
Franklin Bank since 2002. Prior to 2002, Mr. Venables
co-founded Lighthouse Bank of Waltham, Massachusetts in 1999 and
served as its President and Chief Executive Officer. From 1998
to 1999, Mr. Venables was employed as a consultant with
Marsh and McLennan Capital, Inc. He was employed by Grove Bank
of Newton, Massachusetts from 1974 until it was acquired by
Citizens Bank in 1997, serving as its President and Chief
Executive Officer for the last 11 years of his tenure.
Alfred H. Wahlers is the Chairman of the Board of
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and Benjamin Franklin Bank.
Mr. Wahlers is a retired insurance executive.
59
Charles Yergatian is a retired residential real estate
developer.
Upon completion of the Chart Bank acquisition, six directors of
Chart Bank will be appointed as directors of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp and Benjamin Franklin Bank. The principal occupation and
business experience for the last five years for each of these
Chart Bank directors is set forth below. All of these
individuals have held their present positions for five years
unless otherwise stated.
Richard E. Bolton, Jr. has served as the President
and Chief Executive Officer of Chart Bank since 1995. He has
served as President of Chart Banks subsidiary, CSSI, since
1999. Mr. Bolton is 46 years old.
Paul E. Capasso is the President of Capasso Realty
Corporation located in Newton, Massachusetts, a real estate
investment company specializing in apartment and office building
ownership. Mr. Capasso is 48 years old.
Jonathan A. Haynes is the President of Haynes Management,
a real estate management firm located in Wellesley Hills,
Massachusetts, and President of D.M. Bernardi, a general
contracting firm located in Wellesley Hills, Massachusetts.
Mr. Haynes is 49 years old.
Daniel F. OBrien is a certified public accountant
and owner and president of OBrien, Riley and Ryan, a CPA
firm located in Boston. Mr. OBrien is also the
manager of State Street Wealthcare Advisors, LLC, a financial
services company and State Street Consulting, LLC, a computer
services consulting firm. Mr. OBrien is also a
practicing attorney. Mr. OBrien is 49 years old.
Donald P. Quinn is an attorney in private practice in
Plymouth, Massachusetts. He was formerly a partner concentrating
in commercial business and real estate matters at Goodwin
Procter LLP, a law firm located in Boston. Mr. Quinn is
67 years old.
Neil E. Todreas is a professor of nuclear engineering and
a professor of mechanical engineering at Massachusetts Institute
of Technology. He also provides consulting services through his
company, Energy Technology Associates, Inc. Mr. Todreas is
70 years old.
Procedures for Shareholders to Nominate Directors
Shareholders of record who wish to propose a candidate for
nomination to the Board must comply with Section 3.3 and
related sections of our by-laws, which sets forth procedural
requirements for such nominations. To be timely, such a proposal
must be received by our corporate secretary at our principal
executive offices at least 120 days and not more than
150 days in advance of the anniversary date of our proxy
statement for our prior years annual meeting. For our
first annual meeting following the conversion, notice must reach
us not later than the close of business on the tenth calendar
day after public disclosure of the date of that first annual
meeting. Section 3.3 specifies the type of information
about the qualifications and background of the proposed nominee
that the shareholder must supply to us, including the consent of
the proposed nominee to serve as a director if he or she is
elected. The Governance Committee may reject any nomination by a
shareholder that is not timely made or does not satisfy the
information delivery requirements of the by-law. In general, we
will have no obligation to include in our proxy materials
information about a nominee proposed by a shareholder, unless
the Governance Committee itself decides to propose that nominee
on behalf of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp.
Committees and Meetings of the Board
Benjamin Franklin Banks Board meets on a monthly basis and
may hold additional special meetings. During 2004, the Board
held 12 regular meetings, one of which was an annual meeting,
and five special meetings.
The Board of Trustees of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp held four
regular meetings and eight special meetings during 2004. The
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp regular meetings are held immediately
before or after the Benjamin Franklin Bank Board meeting
scheduled for that month. Following the conversion, the Board of
Directors of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp is expected to meet on a
monthly basis, or more often as may be necessary.
60
The Boards of Directors of Benjamin Franklin Bank and Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp currently have three standing Board Committees.
Those Board Committees are the Executive Committee, the Audit
and Risk Management Committee and the Compensation Committee. In
addition, in anticipation of the conversion, the Board of
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp will appoint a Governance Committee.
Each of the Audit and Risk Management Committee, Compensation
Committee and Governance Committee will be comprised solely of
independent directors within the meaning of the rules
promulgated under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the Nasdaq
listing requirements. The Board of Directors may, by resolution,
designate one or more additional committees.
The following committee descriptions set forth the current
members of each of Benjamin Franklin Bancorps existing
Board committee. However, immediately after completion of the
Chart Bank acquisition, each committee will be reconstituted to
integrate the six Chart Bank directors who will join the Board
such that, to the extent feasible, former Chart directors serve
on each committee in the same proportions as they serve on the
Board of Directors. This committee reorganization is also likely
to result in certain changes in the committee assignments of the
current Benjamin Franklin Bancorp Board members.
The Executive Committee currently consists of Dr. William
Brady, Jr., William Bissonnette, Anne King, John Murphy,
Thomas Venables, Alfred Wahlers, Charles Yergatian, with
Dr. Brady serving as Chair. The Executive Committee meets
semi-monthly to review ongoing activities and performance of the
Bank. The Committee approves loan originations that exceed
certain internal limitations, and reviews other loans
originations, the monthly asset/liability report and monthly
financial reports. The Executive Committee met 25 times during
2004.
The Audit and Risk Management Committee currently consists of
Charles Oteri, Dr. Mary Ambler, John Fuller and Richard
Mann, with Mr. Oteri serving as Chair. Each member of the
Audit and Risk Management Committee is an independent director
as determined in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and the Nasdaq listing requirements. At the present time, the
Board has determined that no Audit and Risk Management Committee
member is an audit committee financial expert under
applicable regulations and is currently considering whether or
not to add to the Board a director who would be an audit
committee financial expert. However, the Board has also
concluded that each Committee member has sufficient knowledge in
financial and auditing matters to serve on the Committee. The
Audit and Risk Management Committee operates under a charter and
oversees the independent auditor relationship, the internal
audit, risk management and compliance functions. The Committee
met five times during 2004.
The Compensation Committee currently consists of William
Bissonnette, Richard Mann, John Murphy, Charles Oteri and Alfred
Wahlers, with Mr. Bissonnette serving as Chair. The
Compensation Committee oversees Director and executive officer
compensation and certain employee benefit plans.
The Governance Committee is expected to consist of six
directors. The Governance Committee will be responsible for
establishing criteria for Directors, making recommendations for
the nomination of Directors, overseeing self-assessment
evaluations for the Board and its Committees and addressing
other governance issues.
61
Executive Officers
The names, ages as of March 15, 2005, and positions of each
of our executive officers, other than Thomas R. Venables, who is
included in the description of directors above, are set forth
below.
|
|
|
|
|
Name(1) |
|
Age |
|
Position |
|
|
|
|
|
Claire S. Bean
|
|
52 |
|
Executive Vice President/Chief Financial Officer, Benjamin
Franklin Bank; Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp |
Ronald E. Baron
|
|
48 |
|
Senior Vice President/Treasurer, Benjamin Franklin Bank |
Mariane E. Broadhurst
|
|
48 |
|
Senior Vice President/Retail Banking, Benjamin Franklin Bank |
Rose M. Buckley
|
|
37 |
|
Senior Vice President/Senior Commercial Lending Officer,
Benjamin Franklin Bank |
Michael J. Piemonte
|
|
51 |
|
Senior Vice President/Risk Management and Compliance, Benjamin
Franklin Bank |
Brian E. Ledwith
|
|
36 |
|
Vice President/Senior Retail Lending Officer, Benjamin Franklin
Bank |
Kathleen P. Sawyer
|
|
47 |
|
Vice President/Human Resources, Benjamin Franklin Bank |
|
|
(1) |
Upon completion of the Chart Bank merger, two officers of Chart
Bank, Alfred F. Odoardi and James Golden, are expected to become
our executive officers. Their biographies are included below. |
Claire S. Bean has served as Executive Vice President/
Chief Financial Officer of Benjamin Franklin Bank since July
2004. Prior to her employment with Benjamin Franklin Bank,
Ms. Bean served as Banking Advisor in the Capital Markets
Group of FINCA International, Inc. and later as Regional
Director of FINCA for Eastern Europe and NIS. From May 2002 to
June 2003, Ms. Bean served as Director of Economic
Development in Kyrgyzstan for the Mercy Corps, and from June
2003 to September 2003, she served as Manager of
Micro-enterprise and Economic Development for the same
organization. In addition, from 1999 to 2001, Ms. Bean
served as Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Lighthouse Bank of Waltham, Massachusetts. From 1991 to 1997,
Ms. Bean served as Executive Vice President/ Treasurer of
Grove Bank of Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts.
Ronald E. Baron has served as Senior Vice President/
Treasurer of Benjamin Franklin Bank since April, 2003.
Mr. Baron joined the Bank in June 1997 as Assistant Vice
President/ Controller. He was promoted to Vice President/
Treasurer and Controller in January 2002 and to Senior Vice
President in April 2003. Prior to his employment at Benjamin
Franklin Bank, Mr. Baron served as Vice President of
Finance at Educor, Inc. for three years and was a Credit
Specialist at Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation from 1991 to
1994.
Mariane E. Broadhurst has served as Senior Vice
President/ Retail Banking of Benjamin Franklin Bank since April,
2003. Ms. Broadhurst joined the Bank in August 1992 as a
Branch Manager. She was promoted to Assistant Vice President/
Branch Administrator in December 1997 and in April 2002 was
promoted to Vice President of Retail Banking. Prior to her
employment with Benjamin Franklin Bank, Ms. Broadhurst was
employed as an Assistant Treasurer/ Branch Sales Manager of
Heritage Bank in Worcester, Massachusetts, beginning in 1988.
Rose M. Buckley has served as Senior Vice President/
Senior Commercial Lending Officer of Benjamin Franklin Bank
since April 2003. She joined the Bank in 1984 as a commercial
loan officer. She was promoted to Assistant Vice President/
Commercial Lending in April 1997 and to Vice President/
Commercial Lending in April 1998.
Michael J. Piemonte has served as Senior Vice President/
Risk Management and Compliance of Benjamin Franklin Bank since
December 2003. He joined Benjamin Franklin Bank in March 1998 as
62
Assistant Vice President/ Auditor/ Compliance and Loan Review
Officer in the Internal Audit Department. He became Assistant
Vice President/ Compliance Officer in the Compliance Department
in July 2001 and became Vice President/ Risk Management and
Compliance in December 2001.
Brian E. Ledwith has served as Vice President/ Senior
Retail Lending Officer of Benjamin Franklin Bank since September
2004. He joined the Bank in February 2004 as Vice President/
Commercial Lending. Prior to his employment with Benjamin
Franklin Bank, Mr. Ledwith served as Vice President/ Senior
Loan Officer of Medway Cooperative Bank of Medway,
Massachusetts. From 2000 to 2002, Mr. Ledwith served as
Vice President of the Commercial Lending Department of Strata
Bank in Franklin, Massachusetts. In addition, from 1998 to April
2000, Mr. Ledwith served as Vice President of Commercial
Banking of Rockland Trust in Brockton, Massachusetts.
Kathleen P. Sawyer has served as Vice President/ Human
Resources of Benjamin Franklin Bank since April, 2003.
Ms. Sawyer served as a Human Resources Officer of Benjamin
Franklin Bank from 1996 to 2000, and as Assistant Vice
President/ Human Resources from 2000 to 2003.
Upon completion of the Chart Bank acquisition, the following two
officers of Chart Bank are expected to become executive officers
of Benjamin Franklin Bank.
Alfred J. Odoardi has served as Senior Vice
President Commercial Lending and Senior Loan Officer
of Chart Bank since August 1995. Upon completion of the Chart
Bank acquisition, Mr. Odoardi is expected to become Senior
Vice President of Benjamin Franklin Bank and will be responsible
for the commercial business loan department that Benjamin
Franklin Bank intends to establish following the acquisition.
Mr. Odoardi is 55 years old.
James Golden is Vice President of Chart Banks ATM
cash management and settlement services subsidiary, CSSI, a
position he has held since October 2001. Previously, he served
as Chart Banks Vice President Retail Banking,
from October 2001 to October 2003, and as a branch manager from
August
1997 to January 2000. Mr. Golden has also served Chart
Bank as its Compliance Officer since October 1997 and as its
Security Officer and CRA Officer since January 1998. Upon
completion of the Chart Bank acquisition, Mr. Golden is
expected to become a Vice President of Benjamin Franklin Bank
and will continue to be responsible for the CSSI ATM cash
management and settlement services business. Mr. Golden is
41 years old.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider
Participation
As noted above, the Board of Trustees of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp established a Compensation Committee in connection with
the adoption of various compensation plans and agreements in
anticipation of the conversion. The members of the Compensation
Committee are Messrs. Bissonnette, Mann, Murphy, Oteri and
Wahlers.
No person now serving as a member of the Compensation Committee
is a current or former officer or employee of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp or Benjamin Franklin Bank or engaged in certain
transactions with Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or Benjamin Franklin
Bank that are required to be disclosed by SEC regulations.
Additionally, there are no compensation committee
interlocks, which generally means that no executive
officer of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or Benjamin Franklin Bank
served as a director or member of the compensation committee of
another entity, one of whose executive officers serves as a
Director or member of the Compensation Committee.
Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, requires our officers, directors and persons who
beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our
common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in
ownership with the SEC. Section 16(a) was not applicable to
us during the year ended December 31, 2004 because we had
not registered under Section 12(g) of the Securities
Exchange Act until March 9, 2005. Moreover, we have not yet
issued any shares of capital stock.
63
Code of Ethics
Our Board of Directors has adopted a code of ethics that applies
to all of our employees, officers and directors. The code covers
compliance with law; conflicts of interest; confidentiality and
integrity of bank and company records; fair and accurate
disclosure to the public; and procedures for compliance with the
code. If you would like a copy of our code of ethics, please
contact our main office at 508-528-7000 to request a copy, which
we will provide to you without charge.
|
|
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
Executive Officer Compensation
The following table sets forth certain information as to the
total remuneration paid by Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and
Benjamin Franklin Bank during the fiscal years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003 to the President and Chief
Executive Officer of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and Benjamin
Franklin Bank and to the five most highly compensated executive
officers of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and Benjamin Franklin Bank
other than the President and Chief Executive Officer who served
as executive officers during or at the end of 2004 and who
received total annual compensation in excess of $100,000. Each
of the individuals listed on the table below is referred to as a
named executive officer.
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
|
Name and Principal Position with |
|
| |
|
|
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and |
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
All Other | |
Benjamin Franklin Bank |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus(1) | |
|
Compensation(2) | |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Thomas R. Venables
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
275,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,247 |
(3) |
|
President and Chief Executive |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
89,032 |
|
|
Officer of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and Benjamin Franklin Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald E. Baron
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,285 |
(4) |
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
95,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,777 |
|
|
Treasurer of Benjamin Franklin Bank and Treasurer of Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rose M. Buckley
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
96,300 |
|
|
$ |
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,778 |
(4) |
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,200 |
|
|
Senior Commercial Lending Officer of Benjamin Franklin Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mariane E. Broadhurst
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
90,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,400 |
(4) |
|
Senior Vice President/ Retail |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
$ |
7,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,417 |
|
|
Banking of Benjamin Franklin Bank |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick E. Niro(5)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
247,118 |
(6) |
|
$ |
12,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
96,586 |
(7) |
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
155,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
28,014 |
|
Stephen F. Banks(8)
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
139,300 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
48,370 |
(9) |
|
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
$ |
135,200 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
23,900 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents bonuses earned in 2004 and 2003, but paid in 2005 and
2004 respectively. |
|
(2) |
Perquisites and other personal benefits paid to each named
executive officer in each instance did not, in the aggregate,
equal or exceed the lesser of either $50,000 or 10% of the total
annual salary and bonus set forth in the columns entitled
Salary and Bonus for each officer and,
accordingly, are omitted from the table as permitted by the
rules of the SEC. |
|
(3) |
Includes Benjamin Franklin Banks matching contribution of
$12,300 under its 401(k) plan and an accrual in connection with
Mr. Venabless salary continuation agreement in the
amount of $59,947. |
|
(4) |
Represents Benjamin Franklin Banks matching contributions
under its 401(k) plan. |
64
|
|
(5) |
Mr. Niro served as Executive Vice President and Senior
Retail Lending Officer of Benjamin Franklin Bank and Vice
President of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp until his retirement on
September 17, 2004. |
|
(6) |
In addition to salary in the amount of $121,634, includes
payments of $45,909 for consulting services during the period
September 17, 2004 through December 31, 2004 and a
severance payment of $79,575. |
|
(7) |
Includes Benjamin Franklin Banks matching contribution of
$12,300 under its 401(k) plan and a lump sum payment of $84,286
under Mr. Niros salary continuation agreement. |
|
(8) |
Mr. Banks served as Executive Vice President and Chief
Information Officer of Benjamin Franklin Bank and Vice President
of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp until his resignation effective
March 25, 2005. |
|
(9) |
Includes Benjamin Franklin Banks matching contribution of
$9,558 under its 401(k) plan and an accrual in connection with
Mr. Bankss supplemental executive retirement plan in
the amount of $38,812. |
Compensation of Directors
During 2004, members of the Benjamin Franklin Bank Board of
Directors received an annual retainer of $4,000 for their
service on the Board and $450 for each Board meeting that they
attended. The Chairman of the Board and the Clerk each received
an additional $1,000 retainer for his or her service in that
capacity. During 2004, members of the Executive Committee and
the Audit and Risk Management Committee received $450 and $600,
respectively, for each committee meeting that they attended, but
did not receive a separate retainer, except that the Chairman of
each committee and the Clerk of the Executive Committee received
a $1,000 annual retainer.
Upon completion of the conversion, and in recognition of
Benjamin Franklin Banks increased size and change to
public company form, the Board and Committee fees will be
adjusted as follows. The annual Board retainer will increase to
$10,000 per year, and the per meeting fee for Board of
Directors meetings will increase to $500 per meeting
attended. The annual retainer for the Chairman of the Board and
the Clerk of Benjamin Franklin Bank will increase to
$2,000 per year. The Executive Committees per meeting
fee will also increase to $500, and the Executive Committee
Chairmans annual retainer will increase to $2,000, but the
Executive Committee Clerk will no longer receive a retainer.
Members of the Audit and Risk Management Committee, Governance
Committee and Compensation Committee will not receive per
meeting fees, but will receive annual retainers of $8,000,
$3,000 and $3,000, respectively. The Chair of each of these
three committees will receive an additional annual retainer of
$2,000.
Members of the Board who are employees of Benjamin Franklin Bank
or Benjamin Franklin Bancorp do not receive these fees.
Generally, Benjamin Franklin Bancorps Board of Directors
meets immediately prior to or after a Benjamin Franklin Bank
Board meeting. In such instances, directors do not receive
additional fees for attendance at meetings of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorps Board. Otherwise, the directors of Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp receive the same fees they receive for
attendance at a Benjamin Franklin Bank Board meeting.
Employment and Change in Control Agreements
Employment Agreements. In connection with the conversion,
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp will enter into employment agreements
with its Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Venables, and its
Executive Vice President, Ms. Bean. The agreements provide
for an annual base salary, subject to increase (which increased
amount becomes a floor below which the officers base
salary may not fall during the term of the agreement), and
certain benefits. They also guarantee customary corporate
indemnification and errors and omissions insurance coverage
throughout the employment term and for six years after
termination. The current base salary of each of
Mr. Venables and Ms. Bean is $315,000 and $200,000,
respectively.
The initial term of each agreement is three years, with the term
automatically extended by one day for each day that the officer
is employed by Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and Benjamin Franklin
Bank, although the automatic extensions may be discontinued at
any time by Benjamin Franklin Bancorp,
65
Benjamin Franklin Bank or the officer. For a one-year period
following termination of the executives employment, the
executive must adhere to a non-competition restriction and
refrain from soliciting employees or certain large commercial
loan customers. Such provision is not operative after the
occurrence of a change in control of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp.
In the event the officers employment is terminated by
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or Benjamin Franklin Bank for other
than specially-defined cause or by the officer for
good reason, each as defined in the agreements, the
officer will be entitled to receive a lump sum severance benefit
equal to three times the highest yearly compensation paid to the
officer in the three fiscal years preceding the termination,
plus certain other benefits. These benefits include continuation
of disability and medical benefits for three years following
termination, an adjustment to the officers pension, and
acceleration of all vesting of stock awards and options. If the
executives employment is terminated following a change in
control, the non-competition and nonsolicitation provisions
described above would not apply.
Mr. Venables and Ms. Bean would also be entitled to
receive an additional tax indemnification payment if payments
under the employment agreements or any other payments triggered
liability under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code
as an excise tax constituting excess parachute
payments. Under applicable law, the excise tax is
triggered by change in control-related payments that equal or
exceed three times the executives average annual
compensation over the five calendar years preceding the change
in control. The excise tax equals 20.0% of the amount of the
payment in excess of one times the executives average
compensation over the preceding five calendar year period.
Change in Control Agreements. Benjamin Franklin Bancorp
will also enter into change in control agreements with six of
its senior officers in connection with the conversion. The
change in control agreements provide for a lump sum severance
payment equal to approximately one times (in the case of
Mr. Baron, Mr. Ledwith, Mr. Piemonte and
Ms. Sawyer) or two times (in the case of
Ms. Broadhurst and Ms. Buckley) the officers
base salary plus the highest annual bonus paid during the three
most recent calendar years and certain other benefits upon
termination of the officers employment under certain
circumstances.
Pursuant to the terms of the change in control agreements, these
severance payments will be triggered if, within two years after
a change in control, as defined in the agreements,
of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or Benjamin Franklin Bank, the
officers employment is terminated for any reason other
than death, deliberate dishonesty or gross misconduct of the
officer with respect to Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or any of its
subsidiaries, or conviction of the officer for the commission of
a felony. These payments will also be triggered if the officer
terminates his or her employment following: (i) a reduction
in the officers annual base salary; (ii) a relocation
of the offices of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or Benjamin Franklin
Bank at which the officer is principally employed by more than a
specified number of miles; (iii) a failure of Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp or Benjamin Franklin Bank to pay any portion of
compensation due to the officer within seven days of the date
such compensation is due; (iv) a failure by Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp or Benjamin Franklin Bank to continue the
officers participation in any material compensation,
incentive bonus or benefit plan (or in a successor plan) or the
failure of a successor in interest to make available its
benefits plans to the officer on a basis that is not
substantially less favorable than the successor generally
affords to its other employees holding similar positions; or
(v) a failure of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or Benjamin
Franklin Bank to obtain a satisfactory agreement from any
successor to assume and agree to perform the officers
change in control agreement.
In addition, if the officers employment is terminated for
the reasons described above, Benjamin Franklin Bancorp will
continue to pay to the officer the disability and medical
benefits existing as of and at the level in effect on the date
of termination, at no greater cost to the officer than the
officer is currently paying, for one year (in the case of
Mr. Baron, Mr. Ledwith, Mr. Piemonte and
Ms. Sawyer) or two years (in the case of
Ms. Broadhurst and Ms. Buckley). In the event payments
and benefits under the change in control agreements, together
with other payments and benefits the officers may receive, would
constitute an excess parachute payment under Section 280G
of the Internal Revenue Code, such payments would be reduced to
an amount necessary to avoid such payments constituting
parachute payments.
66
Benefit Plans
Employee Stock Ownership Plan. In anticipation of the
conversion, Benjamin Franklin Bank has established an employee
stock ownership plan for its employees. Employees who have been
credited with at least 1,000 hours of service during a
consecutive 12-month period and who have attained age 21
will be eligible to participate in Benjamin Franklin Banks
employee stock ownership plan.
The employee stock ownership plan intends to purchase a number
of shares equal to 8.0% of the common stock issued in the
offering (including shares issued to the Benjamin Franklin Bank
Charitable Foundation). Benjamin Franklin Bank anticipates that
the employee stock ownership plan will borrow from Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp (or a subsidiary established for that purpose)
to fund these purchases. The loan from Benjamin Franklin Bancorp
to the employee stock ownership plan will be repaid principally
from Benjamin Franklin Banks contributions to the employee
stock ownership plan over a period of 30 years and the
collateral for the loan will be the stock purchased by the
employee stock ownership plan. The interest rate for the
employee stock ownership plan loan from Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp will be fixed and is expected to be at Benjamin Franklin
Banks prime rate at the date the loan is entered into with
the employee stock ownership plan. Benjamin Franklin Bank and
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp may, in any plan year, make additional
discretionary contributions for the benefit of plan participants
in cash, shares of common stock, or other property. The timing,
amount and manner of future contributions to the employee stock
ownership plan will be affected by various factors, including
prevailing regulatory policies, the requirements of applicable
laws and regulations and market conditions.
Shares purchased by the Benjamin Franklin Bank employee stock
ownership plan will be held in a suspense account and released
for allocation to participants on a pro rata basis as debt
service payments are made. Shares released from the employee
stock ownership plan will be allocated to each eligible
participants employee stock ownership plan account based
on the ratio of each such participants compensation, as
defined, to the total compensation of all eligible employee
stock ownership plan participants. Forfeitures shall be
reallocated among remaining participating employees.
Upon the completion of two years of service, the account
balances of participants within the employee stock ownership
plan will become 20.0% vested. The vested percentage of
participants account balances will thereupon be increased
by an additional 20.0% for each additional year of service,
until account balances reach 100.0% vesting upon the completion
of six years of service. Credit is given for years of service
with Benjamin Franklin Saving Bank or any of its affiliates
prior to the adoption of the employee stock benefit plan. In the
event of a change in control, as defined in the
employee stock ownership plan, however, participants will become
immediately fully vested in their account balances. Participants
will also become fully vested in their account balances upon
death, disability, retirement, termination of this plan, or the
permanent and complete discontinuance of contributions by
Benjamin Franklin Bank and any of its affiliates to this plan.
Benefits may be payable upon retirement or separation from
service.
Benjamin Franklin Bank has appointed First Bankers
Trust Services, Inc., an independent corporate trustee, to
serve as the trustee of the Benjamin Franklin Bank employee
stock ownership plan. Under the terms of the Benjamin Franklin
Bank employee stock ownership plan, the trustee must generally
vote all allocated shares held in the employee stock ownership
plan in accordance with the instructions from the participating
employees. Unallocated shares and allocated shares for which no
written instructions have been received by the trustee regarding
voting will be voted by the trustee in a manner calculated to
most accurately reflect the instructions the trustee has
received from participants regarding allocated shares, and must
be voted in a manner determined by the trustee to be solely in
the best interests of the participants and beneficiaries of the
plan.
Generally accepted accounting principles require that any third
party borrowing by the Benjamin Franklin Bank employee stock
ownership plan be reflected as a liability on Benjamin Franklin
Banks balance sheet. If the employee stock ownership plan
borrows the necessary funds from Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, the
loan will not be treated as a liability but instead will be
excluded from stockholders equity. If the employee stock
ownership plan purchases newly issued shares from Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp, total stockholders equity would neither
increase nor decrease, but per share stockholders equity
and per
67
share net earnings would decrease as the newly issued shares are
allocated to the employee stock ownership plan participants.
Benjamin Franklin Banks employee stock ownership plan will
be subject to the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the applicable regulations
of the Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Labor.
401(k) Plan. Benjamin Franklin Bank maintains the
SBERA 401(k) Plan as adopted by Benjamin Franklin Bank, a
tax-qualified plan under Section 401(a) of the Internal
Revenue Code with a cash or deferred arrangement under
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. In general,
all salaried and hourly employees who are at least age 21
become eligible to make salary reduction contributions in the
401(k) plan and to receive matching contributions from
Benjamin Franklin Bank under the 401(k) plan on the first
day of the month following the completion of three months of
employment with Benjamin Franklin Bank.
Under the 401(k) plan, participants may elect to have
Benjamin Franklin Bank contribute up to 75.0% of their
compensation to the 401(k) plan, subject to the dollar
limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Benjamin
Franklin Bank currently makes matching contributions to the
401(k) plan equal to 200.0% of the first 3.0% of
compensation deferred by a participant. Compensation for
purposes of the 401(k) plan generally consists of total
taxable income of a participant as reported on Form W-2
with all pre-tax contributions added, but excluding compensation
received from the Vacation Buy Back Program. The level of
matching contributions under the 401(k) plan may change
from time to time.
Currently, participants in the 401(k) plan may direct the
investment of their accounts in several types of investment
funds. In connection with the conversion, Benjamin Franklin Bank
has amended the 401(k) plan to permit participants in the
401(k) plan to direct the investment of their accounts in
common stock of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, which shares will be
held in a newly formed Employer Stock Fund. Investment in the
Employer Stock Fund will generally be limited to 20.0% of a
participants 401(k) account, but a participant may waive
this limitation upon signing a certification that he or she
understands the risk of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp stock
ownership. Participants in the 401(k) plan will be given the
opportunity to direct the 401(k) plan trustee to subscribe for
shares of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp common stock in the
conversion based on their individual subscription priorities,
using the funds in the participants 401(k) plan accounts.
Participants are always 100.0% vested in their elective
deferrals and related earnings under the 401(k) plan. In
addition, participants become fully vested in matching
contributions and related earnings when such contributions are
deposited. Participants may receive distributions from the
401(k) plan in the form of a single lump payment or installment
payments.
Benefit Restoration Plan. In connection with the
conversion, Benjamin Franklin Bank intends to establish the
Benefit Restoration Plan, a non-tax-qualified plan that will
provide restorative payments to certain executives who are
prevented from receiving earned benefits under Benjamin Franklin
Banks 401(k) plan or employee stock ownership plan because
of limitations in the Internal Revenue Code applicable to
tax-qualified plans. The initial participants in the benefit
restoration plan will be Mr. Venables and Ms. Bean,
with the Board of Directors of Benjamin Franklin Bank
designating certain management personnel or highly compensated
employees as additional participants in the benefit restoration
plan from time to time. The Board of Directors of Benjamin
Franklin Bank may also limit which benefits such additional
participants will receive under the benefit restoration plan.
Eligible participants will receive a restorative payment equal
to the amount of additional benefits the participants would
receive under the 401(k) plan if there were no income
limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible
participants will also receive a restorative payment in lieu of
shares that cannot be allocated to participants under the
employee stock ownership plan due to the legal limitations
imposed on tax-qualified plans. In addition, eligible
participants who retire before the repayment in full
of the loan to the employee stock ownership plan will receive
restorative payments equal to the projected value of shares of
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp common stock that would have been
allocated to the
68
executive over the remaining term of any loan, as if employment
had continued through the full term of the loan, regardless of
limitations in the Internal Revenue Code. Retirement
is defined in the benefit restoration plan as the first to occur
of termination of employment at any time following satisfaction
of the requirements for early or normal retirement under the
employee stock ownership plan (unless otherwise permitted by the
Benjamin Franklin Bank Board of Directors), death while employed
as a full-time employee, or the occurrence of a change in
control, regardless of whether the participant continues
in the employ of the employer or any successor following the
change in control.
Executive Salary Continuation Agreement and Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan. Mr. Venables is also
entitled to retirement benefits pursuant to the terms of a
Salary Continuation Agreement with Benjamin Franklin Bank and
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp. This benefit arrangement is sometimes
referred to as a SERP.
Under the terms of his SERP, Mr. Venables is entitled to an
annual retirement benefit at age 65, payable in monthly
installments for a period of 20 years, equal to 75.0% of
his total compensation for the last full calendar year of
employment, but reduced by his annual annuity retirement benefit
from Benjamin Franklin Banks contributions to his 401(k)
plan and his annual social security benefit. Mr. Venables
is entitled to a reduced benefit upon retirement prior to
age 65 equal to the liability then accrued on Benjamin
Franklin Banks books for the costs of benefits payable
pursuant to his SERP. Based upon current compensation levels
(adjusted for inflation at the rate of 5%) and assuming
retirement at age 65, Mr. Venables would be entitled
to an annual benefit of $443,832 under his SERP.
In connection with the conversion, Benjamin Franklin Bancorp
intends to amend Mr. Venabless SERP to include a
provision that any amounts payable under these agreements will
be reduced by amounts payable to each executive under the
employee stock ownership plan and the benefit restoration plan.
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp also intends to amend
Mr. Venabless SERP so that his annual retirement
benefit, payable under the SERP, will be reduced by one-half of
his annual social security benefit, instead of the full amount
of his annual social security benefit. In addition, Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp intends to amend Mr. Venabless SERP
to comply with a new provision of the Internal Revenue Code,
Section 409A, which is effective January 1, 2005, and
applies to deferred compensation arrangements. In order to
comply with Section 409A, the SERP will be amended to
provide that any payment upon termination of employment, other
than in the case of death, shall not be made until at least
6 months after such termination. Also, the SERP will be
amended to remove the potential for Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or
Mr. Venables to exercise discretion with regard to the
timing or form of payment under the SERP. These amendments will
not be implemented until the Internal Revenue Service issues
further guidance regarding Section 409A, which is expected
to be issued in the first half of 2005. In addition, after the
IRS issues that further guidance, Benjamin Franklin Bancorp
intends to implement an additional salary continuation agreement
to provide for supplemental retirement benefits to Ms. Bean.
Employee Salary Continuation Plan. Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp has established, effective upon completion of the
conversion, an employee salary continuation plan, which will
provide eligible employees with severance pay benefits and other
benefits in the event that their employment is terminated within
a year after a change in control of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or
Benjamin Franklin Bank. Severance benefits will be equal to the
greater of (i) two weeks salary for each year or
partial year of service, up to a maximum of 52 weeks
salary, or (ii) the applicable minimum benefit.
For Senior Vice Presidents or higher, the minimum
benefit is 52 weeks salary, for Vice
Presidents, it is 39 weeks salary, for Assistant Vice
Presidents, it is 26 weeks salary, for all other
exempt employees, it is 13 weeks salary, for all
other full-time employees, it is 8 weeks salary, and
for all part-time employees, it is 6 weeks salary.
Employees entitled to severance also receive continued
employer-paid life and health insurance coverage for the greater
of (a) six months or (b) the number of weeks of salary
continuation benefits to which the employee is entitled under
the plan, as well as professional outplacement and job
assistance services. These benefits are also available to
employees who resign because they have not been offered a
comparable position following a change in control. A
comparable position is defined as a position which
is offered to an employee where (a) there is no reduction
in base salary or scheduled hours, and (b) the employee will
69
be principally employed at a location not more than
25 miles from the office where the employee is principally
employed immediately prior to the change in control.
Director Fee Continuation Plan. Benjamin Franklin Bancorp
has established, effective upon completion of the conversion, a
director fee continuation plan, which provides certain benefits
to all eligible non-employee members of the boards of directors
of Benjamin Franklin Bank and Benjamin Franklin Bancorp upon
retirement. A director is eligible to receive these benefits
(provided that the director was not terminated for cause) if the
director has served as a director for three years or more with
Benjamin Franklin Bank or Benjamin Franklin Bancorp. Service
with a corporate predecessor, such as Chart Bank, is not
included in determining whether this three-year service
requirement has been met.
A director who has served on the board or as clerk for at least
15 years (10 years for those who have attained
age 70) is entitled to receive an annual payment,
commencing upon termination of service and payable for five
years, equal to the average total yearly fees for services as a
director paid by Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or Benjamin Franklin
Bank to the director for the three calendar years preceding the
year of the directors retirement. Service with a corporate
predecessor, such as Chart Bank, is included in determining the
amount of the normal retirement benefit. Eligible directors who
retire prior to attaining the full 15 (or 10) years of
service are entitled to receive a reduced retirement benefit,
based upon the directors number of years of service,
payable annually for five years following termination of service.
In the event of a change in control, as defined in
the directors fee continuation plan, if an eligible
directors service is terminated or if the director is not
proposed for reelection within three years following the
change in control, the director is entitled to
receive a full normal retirement benefit (as if he had served as
a director for 15 years) as a lump sum upon termination of
service. An eligible director who becomes disabled prior to
age 70 is also entitled to receive the normal retirement
benefit, payable in equal installments over five years and
commencing upon termination of service. In addition, upon the
death of an eligible director prior to termination of service,
the directors beneficiary is entitled to receive a normal
retirement benefit, and upon the death of an eligible director
after retirement, the directors beneficiary is entitled to
receive the remainder of any benefit payments to which the
director is entitled, with each such benefit payable annually
and commencing upon the death of the director.
Stock-Based Incentive Plan. Following the conversion we
intend to implement a stock-based incentive plan that will
provide for grants of stock options and restricted stock to
directors, officers and employees. The stock-based incentive
plan cannot be established sooner than six months after the
offering and, if implemented less than one year after the
offering, would require the approval of our stockholders by
two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Benjamin Franklin
Bancorp common stock. If the stock-based incentive plan is
implemented more than one year after the offering, the
stock-based incentive plan must be approved by a majority of the
shares of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp present and voting. If such
plan is adopted less than one year after completion of the
offering, the number of options granted and restricted shares
awarded under the plan may not exceed 10.0% and 4.0%,
respectively, of the total shares issued in the offering,
including shares issued to the Benjamin Franklin Bank Charitable
Foundation. However, these limitations would not apply if such
stock-based incentive plan is implemented one year or more after
the completion of the offering. Finally, if adopted within one
year, the stock-based incentive plan would be subject to such
other limitations as may be imposed by the Massachusetts
Commissioner of Banks, including the following requirements:
|
|
|
|
|
Non-employee directors in the aggregate may not receive more
than 30.0% of the options and restricted awards authorized under
the plan; |
|
|
|
Any one non-employee director may not receive more than 5.0% of
the options and restricted awards authorized under the plan; |
|
|
|
Any officer or employee may not receive more than 25.0% of the
options and restricted awards authorized under the plan; |
70
|
|
|
|
|
The options and restricted awards may not vest more rapidly than
20.0% per year, beginning on the first anniversary of
stockholder approval of the plan; and |
|
|
|
Accelerated vesting is not permitted except for death or
disability. |
After the first anniversary of the conversion, we may amend the
plan to change or remove these restrictions. If we adopt a
stock-based incentive plan within one year after the conversion,
we expect to amend the plan later to remove these restrictions
and to provide for accelerated vesting in cases of retirement
and change of control. We may obtain the shares needed for this
plan by issuing additional shares or through stock repurchases.
We have not decided whether we will implement this plan before
or after the one-year anniversary of the conversion.
Interests of Chart Banks Directors and Officers in the
Acquisition of Chart Bank
Chart Banks directors and executive officers have
interests in the merger that are different from, or are in
addition to, their interests as shareholders of Chart Bank
generally. For more information about these benefits, see
Item 13 of this Annual Report, Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions Interests of Chart
Banks Directors and Officers in the Acquisition of Chart
Bank, which is incorporated herein by this reference.
|
|
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
Not applicable. We have not yet issued any shares of our capital
stock or options to acquire such shares.
|
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
Federal law and regulations generally require that all loans or
extensions of credit to directors and executive officers must be
made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates
and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with the general public and must not involve more
than the normal risk of repayment or present other unfavorable
features. However, regulations also permit directors and
executive officers to receive the same terms through benefit or
compensation plans that are widely available to other employees,
as long as the director or executive officer is not given
preferential treatment compared to the other participating
employees. Pursuant to such a program, loans have been extended
to directors and executive officers, which loans are on
substantially the same terms as those prevailing at the time for
comparable transactions with the general public. These loans do
not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present
other unfavorable features.
71
The six directors of Chart Bank who will become directors of
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp are stockholders of Chart Bank, and in
such capacity they have a material interest in the merger
agreement between Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and Chart Bank. The
following table summarizes the number of shares of Benjamin
Franklin Bancorp common stock and amount of cash that each of
these directors will receive in the merger in exchange for his
shares of Chart Bank common stock and Chart Bank options. The
information in the table is based on the number of shares of
Chart Bank common stock in which a director has or shares a
direct or indirect pecuniary interest as of December 6,
2004, which in some cases is different from the number of shares
that the director beneficially owns, and assumes that each
director exchanges 55% of his Chart Bank shares for shares
of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp common stock and 45% of his Chart
Bank shares for cash and that all Chart Bank options are cashed
out at the closing rather than being exercised prior to the
closing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director |
|
Shares | |
|
Cash | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Richard E. Bolton, Jr.
|
|
|
14,375 |
|
|
$ |
947,625 |
|
Paul E. Capasso
|
|
|
35,711 |
|
|
|
292,207 |
|
Jonathan A. Haynes(1)
|
|
|
115,287 |
|
|
|
943,296 |
|
Daniel F. OBrien
|
|
|
17,250 |
|
|
|
141,150 |
|
Donald P. Quinn(2)
|
|
|
58,863 |
|
|
|
481,641 |
|
Neil E. Todreas
|
|
|
116,273 |
|
|
|
951,333 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes 40,792 shares and $333,770 in which
Mr. Hayness children have a pecuniary interest. |
|
(2) |
Includes 7,120 shares and $58,282 in which
Mr. Quinns spouse has a pecuniary interest, but with
respect to which Mr. Quinn disclaims beneficial ownership. |
Interests of Chart Banks Directors and Officers in the
Acquisition of Chart Bank
Chart Banks directors and executive officers have
interests in the merger that are different from, or are in
addition to, their interests as shareholders of Chart Bank
generally. These include, among other things, severance payments
and agreements with Richard E. Bolton, Sr., Richard E.
Bolton, Jr., Alfred J. Odoardi, Dean Kenney, non-continuing
directors and other executive officers of Chart Bank, consulting
and non-competition agreements with
Messrs. Bolton, Sr. and Bolton, Jr.,
indemnification rights and insurance coverage and payment of
director fees to Chart Bank directors who will serve on the
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp board.
Severance Agreements and Payments. In connection with the
Chart Bank merger agreement, we entered into payments and waiver
agreements with Richard E. Bolton, Jr., the President and
Chief Executive Officer of Chart Bank, and Richard E.
Bolton, Sr., the Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Chart Bank and an executive officer of its wholly owned
subsidiary, CSSI. The payments and waiver agreements provide for
the termination of Mr. Bolton, Jr.s employment
agreement and Mr. Bolton, Sr.s employment and
consulting agreement and all of Mr. Bolton, Jr.s
and Mr. Bolton, Sr.s employment and director
relationships with Chart Bank and its subsidiaries, effective
upon the merger. Additionally, in exchange for
Mr. Bolton, Sr. and Mr. Bolton, Jr. agreeing
to relinquish the right to receive certain payments in the event
of a change of control of Chart Bank under their existing
agreements with Chart Bank, the payments and waiver agreements
provide for Chart Bank to make termination payments of $486,000
and $620,000 to Mr. Bolton, Sr. and
Mr. Bolton, Jr., respectively, immediately prior to
the effectiveness of the merger. However, in no event will the
amounts under the payments and waiver agreements exceed the
amount that may be paid without causing any portion of such
payment to be deemed an excess parachute payment
within the meaning of Section 280G of the Code.
Mr. Bolton, Jr.s payments and waiver agreement
also provides that he will be appointed as a director of
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and Benjamin Franklin Bank as of the
effective time of the merger.
In addition, Chart Bank entered into a Special Termination
Agreement with Alfred J. Odoardi, Senior Vice President of Chart
Bank, as of August 20, 2004. Under the special termination
agreement,
72
Mr. Odoardi is entitled to certain severance benefits in
the event that his employment with Chart Bank is terminated
after a change in control for any reason other than
death, disability, or cause, each as defined in the
agreement, including continuation of his base salary and medical
benefits for 18 months following termination and full
vesting of all unexercisable stock options held by
Mr. Odoardi on the date of termination. The value to
Mr. Odoardi of the severance pay and benefits continuation
under this agreement is $214,645, based on his current level of
his base salary and medical benefits. Although the completion of
the merger will constitute a change in control under the special
termination agreement, it is not expected that
Mr. Odoardis employment will terminate following the
merger.
As part of the negotiation of the merger, we also agreed that if
Dean Kenney, the Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of Chart
Bank, is terminated within two years of the effective date of
the merger, if his title or position is reduced or changed
during the first two years after the effective date, if his base
salary as of the effective date is reduced, or if his new
designated place of employment is more than 30 driving miles
from his principal place of residence, he will receive severance
benefits, including two years of his annual base salary and
continuation of his medical and dental benefits for two years
following the date of termination. The value to Mr. Kenney
of the severance pay and benefits continuation under this
agreement is $245,194 based on his current level of his base
salary and medical benefits.
Chart Banks other officers whose employment is terminated
in connection with the merger, or who resign following the
merger by reason of a reduction in pay or increase in commute of
greater than 10 miles, will be entitled to receive
severance benefits under Chart Banks employee severance
benefit program. Officers at the level of Vice President and
above are entitled to receive severance in an amount equal to
five times the officers weekly base pay multiplied by the
officers whole and partial years of service with Chart
Bank. Any employee who has completed five full years of service
as of the date of the completion of the merger will be entitled
to receive an additional lump-sum severance benefit equal to
15.0% of the employees annual base salary.
Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Chart Bank may
make severance payments in the aggregate amount of $120,000 to
four of the members of the Chart Bank Board of Directors who
will not become directors of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp or
Benjamin Franklin Bank following the completion of the merger.
Consulting and Non-Competition Agreements. We have also
entered in consulting and non-competition agreements with
Messrs. Bolton, Sr. and Bolton, Jr. in connection
with the merger. Under these agreements,
Messrs. Bolton, Sr. and Bolton, Jr. have agreed
to provide consulting services to us and have agreed to
non-competition obligations for a period of one year after the
effectiveness of the merger. We will pay
Messrs. Bolton, Sr. and Bolton, Jr. fees of
$310,000 and $150,000, respectively, and will reimburse each of
them for their travel or other expenses incurred in connection
with the services provided under the consulting and
non-competition agreements.
Indemnification and Insurance. We have agreed that if the
merger becomes effective, we will indemnify and hold harmless
Chart Banks directors, officers and employees arising from
actions taken before the effectiveness of the merger, as
provided in Chart Banks articles of organization and
bylaws. The merger agreement also provides for continued
directors and officers liability insurance coverage
for Chart Banks directors and officers, with respect to
acts and omissions in their capacities as officers and directors
of Chart Bank prior to the merger, for a period of six years
from the effectiveness of the merger. That insurance may also
protect Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and Benjamin Franklin Bank in
connection with their obligations to indemnify those directors
and officers.
Director Fees. Six of Chart Banks directors will
continue as directors of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp and Benjamin
Franklin Bank following the merger. These directors will be
entitled to receive payment of the directors fees and other
benefits provided to directors of these entities, including,
among other things, the annual $10,000 retainer, per meeting
fees and annual retainers for committee members.
73
|
|
Item 14. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Public Accountants Fees
The following is a summary of the fees for professional services
rendered by Wolf & Company, P.C. for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee Category |
|
2004 Fees | |
|
2003 Fees | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit Fees(1)
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
54,000 |
|
Audit-Related Fees(2)
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
Tax Fees(3)
|
|
|
14,600 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
All Other Fees(4)
|
|
|
159,000 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fees
|
|
$ |
251,100 |
|
|
$ |
98,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Audit Fees. Audit fees were for professional services
rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements, the
review of quarterly financial statements and the preparation of
statutory and regulatory filings. |
|
(2) |
Audit-Related Fees. Audit-related fees were for
professional services rendered in connection with employee
benefit plan audits. |
|
(3) |
Tax Fees. Tax fees consist of fees billed for
professional services for tax compliance, tax planning and tax
advice. These services include assistance regarding federal,
state and international tax compliance and planning, tax audit
defense, and mergers and acquisitions. The Audit and Risk
Management Committee considered and determined that the
provision of non-audit services provided by Wolf &
Company, P.C., is compatible with maintaining that
firms independence. |
|
(4) |
All Other Fees. Other fees were for professional services
provided for information technology controls review and
assessment, and review of regulatory filings in connection with
our stock subscription offering and acquisition of Chart Bank. |
Pre-Approval Policies And Procedures
At present, our Audit and Risk Management Committee approves
each engagement for audit and non-audit services before we
engage Wolf & Company, P.C., to provide those
services. Our Audit and Risk Management Committee has not
established any pre-approval policies or procedures that would
allow our management to engage Wolf &
Company, P.C., to provide any specified services with only
an obligation to notify the Audit and Risk Management Committee
of the engagement for those services. None of the services
provided by Wolf & Company, P.C. for fiscal 2004
was obtained in reliance on the waiver of the pre-approval
requirement afforded in SEC regulations.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
(a) Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. | |
|
Description |
|
Footnotes |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Plan of Conversion of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp. |
|
3 |
|
2 |
.2 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger among Benjamin Franklin Bancorp,
M.H.C., Benjamin Franklin Savings Bank and Chart Bank, a
Cooperative Bank, dated as of September 1, 2004. |
|
2 |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Articles of Organization of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, Inc. |
|
2 |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Bylaws of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, Inc. |
|
2 |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp,
Inc. |
|
5 |
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. | |
|
Description |
|
Footnotes |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.1.1 |
|
Form of Employment Agreement with Thomas R. Venables.* |
|
1 |
|
10 |
.1.2 |
|
Form of Employment Agreement with Claire S. Bean.* |
|
1 |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement with six other Executive
Officers, providing one years severance to Ronald S.
Baron, Brian E. Ledwith, Michael J. Piemonte, Kathleen P.
Sawyer, and two years severance to Mariane E. Broadhurst
and Rose M. Buckley. This form contains all material information
concerning the agreement and the only differences are the name
and contact information of the executive officer who is party to
the agreement and the number of years of severance provided.* |
|
2 |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Form of Benjamin Franklin Bank Benefit Restoration Plan.* |
|
2 |
|
10 |
.4.1 |
|
Benjamin Franklin Bank Salary Continuation Agreement with Thomas
R. Venables dated as of August 22, 2002.* |
|
2 |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp Director Fee Continuation Plan.* |
|
4 |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp Employee Salary Continuation Plan.* |
|
2 |
|
10 |
.7.1 |
|
Payments and Waiver Agreement among Richard E. Bolton, Jr.,
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, M.H.C., Benjamin Franklin Savings
Bank and Chart Bank, a Cooperative Bank, dated as of
September 1, 2004.* |
|
2 |
|
10 |
.7.2 |
|
Consulting and Noncompetition Agreement between Richard E.
Bolton, Jr. and Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, M.H.C., dated as
of September 1, 2004.* |
|
2 |
|
21 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant. |
|
3 |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Wolf & Company, P.C., independent
registered public accounting firm. |
|
1 |
|
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
1 |
|
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
1 |
|
32 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
1 |
|
32 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
1 |
|
99 |
.1 |
|
Consents of Richard E. Bolton, Jr., Paul E. Capasso,
Jonathan A. Haynes, Daniel F. OBrien, Donald P. Quinn, and
Neil E. Todreas, to be identified as proposed directors. |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Relates to compensation. |
|
|
(1) |
Filed herewith. |
|
(2) |
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-121154, filed on
December 10, 2004. |
|
(3) |
Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the
Registrants Registration Statement on Form S-1, File
No. 333-121154, filed on January 24, 2005. |
|
(4) |
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-121608, filed on
December 23, 2004. |
|
(5) |
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on Form 8-A, File No. 000-51194, filed on
March 9, 2005. |
(b) Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the
required information is shown in our financial statements and
related notes.
75
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Benjamin Franklin Bancorp,
M.H.C. has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, M.H.C. |
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Thomas R. Venables |
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas R. Venables |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Report has been signed by the following persons in
the indicated capacities as of March 29, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas R. Venables
Thomas
R. Venables |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, Director
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
/s/ Claire S. Bean
Claire
S. Bean |
|
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
/s/ Mary Ambler
Mary
Ambler |
|
Director |
|
/s/ William P. Bissonnette
William
P. Bissonnette |
|
Director |
|
/s/ William F. Brady, Jr.
William
F. Brady, Jr. |
|
Director |
|
/s/ John C. Fuller
John
C. Fuller |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Anne M. King
Anne
M. King |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Richard D. Mann
Richard
D. Mann |
|
Director |
|
/s/ John D. Murphy
John
D. Murphy |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Charles F. Oteri
Charles
F. Oteri |
|
Director |
76
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alfred H. Wahlers
Alfred
H. Wahlers |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Charles Yergatian
Charles
Yergatian |
|
Director |
77
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Audit Committee
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, M.H.C.
Franklin, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, M.H.C. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of income, changes in retained earnings and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, M.H.C. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2004 in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
Boston, Massachusetts
March 17, 2005
F-2
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
ASSETS |
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$ |
8,691 |
|
|
$ |
14,512 |
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
5,513 |
|
|
|
20,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
14,204 |
|
|
|
35,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
86,070 |
|
|
|
102,646 |
|
Securities held to maturity, at amortized cost
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
Restricted equity securities, at cost
|
|
|
6,975 |
|
|
|
7,222 |
|
Loans
|
|
|
386,545 |
|
|
|
291,385 |
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(3,172 |
) |
|
|
(2,523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
383,373 |
|
|
|
288,862 |
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
11,147 |
|
|
|
11,199 |
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
4,248 |
|
|
|
4,248 |
|
Bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
7,182 |
|
|
|
5,584 |
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,487 |
|
|
|
1,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
517,393 |
|
|
$ |
458,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND RETAINED EARNINGS |
Deposits
|
|
$ |
396,499 |
|
|
$ |
380,257 |
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
4,316 |
|
|
|
4,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
486,065 |
|
|
|
429,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
32,997 |
|
|
|
31,308 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(1,669 |
) |
|
|
(2,007 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retained earnings
|
|
|
31,328 |
|
|
|
29,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
517,393 |
|
|
$ |
458,844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Interest and dividend income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, including fees
|
|
$ |
17,320 |
|
|
$ |
15,530 |
|
|
$ |
16,322 |
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
3,092 |
|
|
|
3,186 |
|
|
|
3,903 |
|
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and dividend income
|
|
|
20,795 |
|
|
|
19,532 |
|
|
|
21,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on deposits
|
|
|
4,366 |
|
|
|
4,487 |
|
|
|
5,856 |
|
|
Interest on short-term borrowings
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest on long-term debt
|
|
|
2,574 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
1,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
7,032 |
|
|
|
6,752 |
|
|
|
7,594 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
13,763 |
|
|
|
12,780 |
|
|
|
13,812 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
13,143 |
|
|
|
12,155 |
|
|
|
12,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (charges):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposit service fees
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
Loan servicing fees
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
Gain on sale of loans, net
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
Gain (loss) on sales of securities, net
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
Income from bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
Pension plan curtailment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(741 |
) |
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
2,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
7,487 |
|
|
|
6,668 |
|
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
1,410 |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
1,814 |
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
Other general and administrative
|
|
|
2,063 |
|
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
2,060 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
12,686 |
|
|
|
12,724 |
|
|
|
12,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
2,581 |
|
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
|
3,139 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
819 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
2,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN RETAINED EARNINGS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Retained | |
|
|
Earnings | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
Earnings | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Balance at December 31, 2001
|
|
$ |
26,924 |
|
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
$ |
27,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
2,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,696 |
|
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of
reclassification adjustment and tax effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
(319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
29,620 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
29,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,688 |
|
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of
reclassification adjustment and tax effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,201 |
) |
|
|
(2,201 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
31,308 |
|
|
|
(2,007 |
) |
|
|
29,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale, net of
reclassification adjustment and tax effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
32,997 |
|
|
$ |
(1,669 |
) |
|
$ |
31,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1,689 |
|
|
$ |
1,688 |
|
|
$ |
2,696 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of securities
|
|
|
855 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred loan costs, net
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
Loss (gain) on sales of securities, net
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(1,569 |
) |
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
1,008 |
|
|
|
Deferred income tax benefit
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
Income from bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
Gains on sales of loans, net
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(975 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
Loans originated for sale
|
|
|
(31,185 |
) |
|
|
(96,256 |
) |
|
|
(69,752 |
) |
|
|
Proceeds from sales of loans
|
|
|
31,308 |
|
|
|
97,231 |
|
|
|
69,823 |
|
|
|
Pension plan curtailment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
741 |
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(1,030 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
4,697 |
|
|
|
5,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
5,591 |
|
|
|
30,886 |
|
|
|
110,420 |
|
|
|
Maturities, calls, and principal repayments
|
|
|
41,830 |
|
|
|
211,994 |
|
|
|
62,883 |
|
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
(31,278 |
) |
|
|
(240,200 |
) |
|
|
(202,921 |
) |
|
Maturities of and principal repayments on held-to-maturity
securities
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
1,763 |
|
|
Net change in restricted equity securities
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of mortgage loans
|
|
|
(34,207 |
) |
|
|
(26,546 |
) |
|
|
(1,298 |
) |
|
Loan originations, net
|
|
|
(61,174 |
) |
|
|
(1,415 |
) |
|
|
(4,727 |
) |
|
Purchases of bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
(1,300 |
) |
|
|
(2,534 |
) |
|
Additions to premises and equipment
|
|
|
(627 |
) |
|
|
(224 |
) |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities
|
|
|
(80,849 |
) |
|
|
(28,205 |
) |
|
|
(36,915 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
16,242 |
|
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
12,178 |
|
|
Proceeds from short-term borrowings
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from long-term debt
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
56,492 |
|
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
21,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(21,281 |
) |
|
|
(16,551 |
) |
|
|
(10,155 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
35,485 |
|
|
|
52,036 |
|
|
|
62,191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$ |
14,204 |
|
|
$ |
35,485 |
|
|
$ |
52,036 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid on deposits
|
|
$ |
4,367 |
|
|
$ |
4,492 |
|
|
$ |
5,871 |
|
|
Interest paid on short-term borrowings
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid on long-term debt
|
|
|
2,485 |
|
|
|
2,280 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
Income taxes paid (refunded)
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
942 |
|
|
|
(356 |
) |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
(Dollars in Thousands)
|
|
1. |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
|
|
Basis of presentation and consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, M.H.C. (the Company) and
its wholly-owned subsidiary, Benjamin Franklin Bank (the
Bank). The Companys wholly-owned subsidiary,
Benjamin Franklin Capital Trust, was included in the
Companys consolidated financial statements for
December 31, 2003 and recorded on the equity method
effective January 1, 2004. The Bank has one subsidiary,
Benjamin Franklin Securities Corp., formed for the purpose of
buying, holding, and selling securities. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
|
|
|
Business and operating segments |
The Company provides a variety of financial services to
individuals and small businesses through its six offices in
Norfolk and Worcester counties. Its primary deposit products are
checking, savings and term certificate accounts, and its primary
lending products are residential and commercial mortgage loans.
The Bank also provides non-deposit investment products to
customers.
Management evaluates the Companys performance and
allocates resources based on a single segment concept.
Accordingly, there are no separately identified operating
segments for which discrete financial information is available.
The Company does not derive revenues from, or have assets
located in, foreign countries, nor does it derive revenues from
any single customer that represents 10% or more of the
Companys total revenues.
In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America, management is required to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to
significant change in the near term relate to the determination
of the allowance for loan losses, valuation of goodwill and the
valuation of deferred tax assets.
Certain amounts in the 2003 and 2002 consolidated financial
statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2004
presentation.
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include cash and balances due from
banks and short-term investments, all of which mature within
ninety days.
Debt securities that management has the positive intent and
ability to hold to maturity are classified as held to
maturity and recorded at amortized cost. Securities not
classified as held to maturity, including equity securities with
readily determinable fair values, are classified as
available for sale and
F-7
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses
excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive
income/loss.
Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized into interest
income using the interest method over the contractual terms of
the securities. Declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity
and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are
deemed to be other-than-temporary are reflected in earnings as
realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment
losses, management considers (1) the length of time and the
extent to which the fair value has been less than cost,
(2) the financial condition of the issuer, and (3) the
intent and ability of the Company to retain its investment in
the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any
anticipated recovery in fair value. Gains and losses on the sale
of securities are recorded on the trade date and determined
using the specific identification method.
Restricted equity securities, which consist primarily of Federal
Home Loan Bank stock ($4,459) and stock in a community
investment fund ($2,000), are carried at cost.
The Bank grants mortgage, commercial and consumer loans to
customers. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is
represented by mortgage loans in Franklin, Massachusetts and
surrounding communities. The ability of the Banks debtors
to honor their contracts is dependent upon the local real estate
market and general economic conditions in this area.
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the
foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off generally are
reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted
for charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, and any deferred
fees or costs on originated loans. Interest income is accrued on
the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of
certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as
an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest
method.
The accrual of interest on mortgage and commercial loans is
discontinued at the time the loan is 90 days past due
unless the credit is well-secured and in process of collection.
Past due status is based on contractual terms of the loan. In
all cases, loans are placed on non-accrual or charged-off at an
earlier date if collection of principal or interest is
considered doubtful.
All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed
on non-accrual or charged off is reversed against interest
income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the
cash-basis or cost-recovery method, until qualifying for return
to accrual. Loans are returned to accrual status when all
principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought
current and future payments are reasonably assured.
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
The allowance for loan losses is established as losses are
estimated to have occurred through a provision for loan losses
charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged against the
allowance when management believes the uncollectibility of a
loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are
credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by
management and is based upon managements periodic review
of the collectibility of the loans in light of historical
experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse
situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay,
estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing
economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as
it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant
revision as more information becomes available.
F-8
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated
components. The specific component relates to loans that are
classified as either doubtful, substandard or special mention.
For such loans that are also classified as impaired, an
allowance is established when the discounted cash flows or
collateral value of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying
value of the loan. The general component covers non-classified
loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for
qualitative factors. An unallocated component is maintained to
cover uncertainties that could affect managements estimate
of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance
reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying
assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific
and general losses in the portfolio.
A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information
and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to
collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.
Factors considered by management in determining impairment
include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of
collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.
Impairment is measured on a loan by loan basis for commercial
loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows
discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or the
fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are
collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Bank
does not separately identify individual consumer and residential
loans for impairment disclosures.
Servicing assets are recognized as separate assets when rights
are acquired through purchase or through sale of financial
assets. For sales of mortgage loans, a portion of the cost of
originating the loan is allocated to the servicing right based
on relative fair value. Fair value is based on market prices for
comparable mortgage servicing contracts. Capitalized servicing
rights are reported in other assets and are amortized into
noninterest income in proportion to, and over the period of, the
estimated future net servicing income of the underlying
financial assets, and are adjusted for prepayments. Servicing
assets are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of
the rights as compared to amortized cost. Impairment is
determined by stratifying rights by the original term of
maturity ranging from 10-30 years and using a weighted
average interest rate and maturity date within each strata. Fair
value is determined using prices for similar assets with similar
characteristics, when available, or based upon discounted cash
flows using market-based assumptions. Impairment is recognized
through a valuation allowance for an individual stratum, to the
extent that fair value is less than the capitalized amount for
the stratum.
Land is carried at cost. Buildings and improvements and
equipment are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation
computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful
lives of the assets.
|
|
|
Transfers of financial assets |
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales when
control over the assets has been surrendered. Control over
transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the
assets have been isolated from the Company, (2) the
transferee obtains the right to pledge or exchange the
transferred assets, and (3) the Company does not maintain
effective control over the transferred assets through an
agreement to repurchase them before their maturity.
F-9
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company recorded an intangible asset of $4.6 million in
connection with its 1998 acquisition of Foxboro National Bank.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets, effective January 1, 2002
amortization of the remaining carrying amount of the goodwill
($4.3 million, net of accumulated amortization of $385)
ceased and management began evaluating goodwill for impairment.
In evaluating the goodwill, management does not track the
separate fair value of Foxboro National Bank, but instead
measures the fair value of the entire Company. If management
determines that goodwill is impaired, the carrying value of
goodwill would be reduced through a charge to earnings. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, management concluded that an
impairment write-down was not required.
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
The Companys derivative financial instruments include
commitments to potential borrowers for loans intended to be sold
and related loan sale commitments to investors in accordance
with SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities. This Statement
requires that all derivatives be recognized as assets or
liabilities in the balance sheet and measured at fair value.
The Company accounted for defined pension plan benefits on the
net periodic pension cost method for financial reporting
purposes. This method recognized the compensation cost of an
employees pension benefit over the employees
approximate service period. The aggregate cost method was
utilized for funding purposes. The Bank elected to curtail the
pension plan effective December 31, 2000. (See
Note 15.)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently
enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the
deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized
or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted,
deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted accordingly
through the provision for income taxes. The Banks base
amount of its federal income tax reserve for loan losses is a
permanent difference for which there is no recognition of a
deferred tax liability. However, the loan loss allowance
maintained for financial reporting purposes is a temporary
difference with allowable recognition of a related deferred tax
asset, if deemed realizable.
A valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets is
established when, in the judgement of management, it is more
likely than not, that all or a portion of such deferred tax
assets will not be realized. (See Note 12.)
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
F-10
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue,
expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although
certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized
gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported
as a separate component of the retained earnings section of the
consolidated balance sheet, such items, along with net income,
are components of comprehensive income (loss). The components of
other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available for
sale
|
|
$ |
266 |
|
|
$ |
(2,361 |
) |
|
$ |
1,081 |
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net-of-tax amount
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
(2,124 |
) |
|
|
707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for (losses) gains realized in income
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
(1,569 |
) |
Tax effect
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net-of-tax amount
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change
|
|
$ |
338 |
|
|
$ |
(2,201 |
) |
|
$ |
(319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent accounting pronouncements |
In December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued a revision to Interpretation
No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities, (FIN 46) which establishes
guidance for determining when an entity should consolidate
another entity that meets the definition of a variable interest
entity. FIN 46 requires a variable interest entity to be
consolidated by a company if that company will absorb a majority
of the expected losses, will receive a majority of the expected
residual returns, or both. FASB deferred the effective date of
FIN 46 to no later than the end of the first reporting
period that ends after March 15, 2004. The Company adopted
FIN 46 as of January 1, 2004 which resulted in the
Company no longer consolidating its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Benjamin Franklin Capital Trust, and recording it on the equity
method. The Interpretation and the revision had no material
effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
In March 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 105, Application of Accounting
Principles to Loan Commitments, which provides guidance
regarding loan commitments that are accounted for as derivative
instruments. In this SAB, the SEC determined that an interest
rate lock commitment should generally be valued at zero at
inception. The rate locks will continue to be adjusted for
changes in value resulting from changes in market interest
rates. This SAB did not have a material effect on the
Companys financial position or results of operations.
On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which
is an Amendment of FASB Statement Nos. 123 and 95.
SFAS No. 123R changes, among other things, the manner
in which share-based compensation, such as stock options, will
be accounted for by both public and non-public companies and
will be effective as of the beginning of the first interim or
annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005.
For public companies, the cost of employee services received in
exchange for equity instruments including options and restricted
stock awards generally will be measured at fair value at the
grant date. The grant date fair value will be estimated using
option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of
those options and instruments, unless observable market prices
for the same or similar options are available. The cost will be
recognized over the requisite service period,
F-11
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
often the vesting period, and will be remeasured subsequently at
each reporting date through settlement date.
On September 30, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
Issue No. 03-1-1 delaying the effective date of
paragraphs 10-20 of EITF 03-1, The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain
Investments, which provides guidance for determining the
meaning of other-than-temporarily impaired and its
application to certain debt and equity securities within the
scope of SFAS No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and investments
accounted for under the cost method. The guidance requires that
investments which have declined in value due to credit concerns
or solely due to changes in interest rates must be recorded as
other-than-temporarily impaired unless the Company can assert
and demonstrate its intention to hold the security for a period
of time sufficient to allow for a recovery of fair value up to
or beyond the cost of the investment which might mean maturity.
The delay of the effective date of EITF 03-1 will be
superceded concurrent with the final issuance of proposed FSP
Issue 03-1-a. Proposed FSP Issue 03-1-a is intended to
provide implementation guidance with respect to all securities
analyzed for impairment under paragraphs 10-20 of
EITF 03-1. Management continues to closely monitor and
evaluate how the provisions of EITF 03-1 and proposed FSP
Issue 03-1-a will affect the Company.
|
|
2. |
STOCK CONVERSION AND MERGER |
On October 28, 2004, the Board of Trustees of the Company
adopted a Plan of Conversion (the Plan) whereby the
Company will convert to a Massachusetts-chartered stock
corporation known as Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, Inc. (the
Stock Holding Company). Effective February 11,
2005, up to 6,612,500 shares of Stock Holding Company stock
have been offered at $10 per share on a priority basis to
qualifying depositors, tax-qualified employee plans, and
employees, officers, directors and trustees of the Bank and the
Company.
As part of the Conversion, the Company will establish a
liquidation account in an amount equal to the net worth of the
Company as of the date of the latest consolidated balance sheet
appearing in the final prospectus distributed in connection with
the Conversion. The liquidation account will be maintained for
the benefit of eligible account holders and supplemental
eligible account holders who maintain their accounts at the
Company after the Conversion. The liquidation account will be
reduced annually to the extent that such account holders have
reduced their qualifying deposits as of each anniversary date.
Subsequent increases will not restore an account holders
interest in the liquidation account. In the event of a complete
liquidation, each eligible account holder will be entitled to
receive balances for accounts then held.
Subsequent to the Conversion, the Company may not declare or pay
dividends on, and may not repurchase, any of its shares of
common stock if the effect thereof would cause
stockholders equity to be reduced below applicable
regulatory capital maintenance requirements or if such
declaration, payment or repurchase would otherwise violate
regulatory requirements.
Conversion costs will be deferred and reduce the proceeds from
the shares sold in the Conversion. If the Conversion is not
completed, all costs will be expensed. As of December 31,
2004, conversion costs in the amount of $875 have been incurred.
As part of the Conversion, the Bank intends to enter into
employment agreements or change of control agreements with
certain executive officers, which in the case of the President
would replace his existing employment agreement. In addition, as
part of the Conversion, the Bank intends to implement an
employee stock ownership plan, a stock based incentive plan and
salary continuation plans for directors, officers and employees.
F-12
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In addition, as part of the Conversion, the Company intends to
form a charitable foundation (the Foundation) by
donating to the Foundation a number of shares of its authorized
but unissued common stock in an amount up to 8% of the lesser of
(i) the number of shares actually sold in the Conversion or
(ii) the number of shares that would have been sold at the
midpoint of the estimated valuation range of the Conversion.
On September 1, 2004, the Company and the Bank signed an
Agreement and Plan of Merger with Chart Bank, A Cooperative Bank
(Chart), a Massachusetts-chartered stock bank
located in Waltham, Massachusetts, whereby Chart, subject to the
Companys Conversion, will be acquired by the Company and
merged into the Bank.
Upon completion of the Companys Conversion, each share of
Charts common stock issued and outstanding immediately
prior to the merger shall be converted into, and shall be
cancelled in exchange for, the right to receive
3.075 shares of the Companys common stock or a cash
amount equal to $30.75 per share of Charts common
stock. The per share stock consideration assumes a $10 per
share price for the Companys common stock to be sold in
the Conversion. In addition, each option to purchase
Charts stock outstanding at the effective date of the
merger, whether or not vested, shall be terminated and each
grantee thereof shall be entitled to receive an amount of cash
equal to the excess of the $30.75 per share cash
consideration over the option exercise price.
The merger has been approved by regulatory authorities and the
Conversion and merger of Chart are expected to close on the same
day and at substantially the same time, however, the Conversion
is not conditioned upon the merger of Chart.
|
|
3. |
RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND DUE FROM BANKS |
The Bank is required to maintain average balances on hand or
with the Federal Reserve Bank. At December 31, 2004 and
2003, these reserve balances amounted to $2,800 and $6,760,
respectively.
|
|
4. |
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS |
Short-term investments consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Federal funds
|
|
$ |
4,380 |
|
|
$ |
16,031 |
|
Bank Investment Liquidity Fund
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
4,937 |
|
Money market account
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,513 |
|
|
$ |
20,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-13
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The amortized cost and fair value of securities with gross
unrealized gains and losses follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Gains | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
|
|
$ |
33,607 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
(303 |
) |
|
$ |
33,306 |
|
Other bonds and obligations
|
|
|
5,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
5,014 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
49,246 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(1,537 |
) |
|
|
47,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
87,909 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
(1,881 |
) |
|
$ |
86,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$ |
217 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
|
|
$ |
30,272 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
(16 |
) |
|
$ |
30,347 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
74,502 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
(2,321 |
) |
|
|
72,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
104,774 |
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
(2,337 |
) |
|
$ |
102,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$ |
386 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities,
excluding mortgage-backed securities, by contractual maturity at
December 31, 2004 is as follows. Expected maturities will
differ from contractual maturities on certain securities because
of call or prepayment provisions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Within 1 year
|
|
$ |
19,626 |
|
|
$ |
19,520 |
|
After 1 year through 5 years
|
|
|
19,037 |
|
|
|
18,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38,663 |
|
|
$ |
38,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of securities available for sale during
the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 amounted
to $5,591, $30,886 and $110,420, respectively. Gross realized
gains of $15, $189 and $1,823, and gross losses of $39, $103 and
$254, were realized during the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
F-14
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Information pertaining to securities with gross unrealized
losses at December 31, 2004 and 2003, aggregated by
investment category and length of time that individual
securities have been in a continuous loss position, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
Over | |
|
|
Twelve Months | |
|
Twelve Months | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
Unrealized | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
Losses | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
26,275 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
6,024 |
|
Other bonds and obligations
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
5,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
43,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
34,320 |
|
|
$ |
1,536 |
|
|
$ |
49,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and federal agency obligations
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
6,379 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
2,295 |
|
|
|
63,998 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$ |
2,311 |
|
|
$ |
70,377 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The above unrealized losses on U.S. Government and federal
agency obligations and other bonds and obligations at
December 31, 2004 represent 0.1% of the securities
amortized cost and reflect temporary declines in fair value
attributable to changes in market interest rates. As management
has both the intent and ability to hold these securities for the
foreseeable future, no declines are deemed to be other than
temporary.
At December 31, 2004, mortgage-backed securities
(MBS) have unrealized losses with an aggregate
depreciation of 3.2% from the amortized cost basis. Significant
portions of these investments are in collateralized mortgage
obligations, commonly referred to as CMOs. The unrealized losses
will continue to exist as market interest rates rise above the
purchase yield of the individual securities. Managements
intent is to hold these securities until maturity, as a core
element of the total investment portfolio. The issuers of the
investments are the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and
the Federal National Mortgage Corporation. The residential
mortgage collateral backing these investments and the guarantees
of the federal agency issuers do not indicate that these
declines are other than temporary.
F-15
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the balances of loans follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Mortgage loans on real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
241,090 |
|
|
$ |
172,123 |
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
85,911 |
|
|
|
68,652 |
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
28,651 |
|
|
|
23,936 |
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
23,199 |
|
|
|
18,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
378,851 |
|
|
|
282,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
4,375 |
|
|
|
5,559 |
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,545 |
|
|
|
7,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
385,396 |
|
|
|
290,660 |
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(3,172 |
) |
|
|
(2,523 |
) |
Net deferred loan costs
|
|
|
1,149 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$ |
383,373 |
|
|
$ |
288,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An analysis of the allowance for loan losses follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
2,523 |
|
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
$ |
1,177 |
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
625 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(537 |
) |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$ |
3,172 |
|
|
$ |
2,523 |
|
|
$ |
2,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of impaired and non-accrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Total impaired loans, all with valuation allowances
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowances related to impaired loans
|
|
$ |
210 |
|
|
$ |
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accrual loans
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans greater than 90 days delinquent and still accruing
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection
with impaired loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Average recorded investment in impaired loans
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
594 |
|
|
$ |
568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired loans
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, loans with a principal
balance of $16,161 and $23,590, respectively, were pledged to
the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston as part of the
Borrower-in-Custody advance program for which there are no
outstanding advances as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Loans serviced by the Bank for others amounted to $130,559 and
$131,845 at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. All
loans sold and serviced for others were sold without recourse
provisions.
Mortgage servicing rights included in other assets at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $653 and $862,
respectively. The fair value of mortgage servicing rights was
$1,001 and $1,008 at December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. Information applicable to mortgage servicing
rights is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Mortgage servicing rights capitalized
|
|
$ |
241 |
|
|
$ |
865 |
|
|
$ |
721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights amortized
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT |
A summary of the cost and accumulated depreciation of premises
and equipment follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Estimated | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
Useful Lives | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Premises:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$ |
4,357 |
|
|
$ |
4,357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
10,614 |
|
|
|
10,458 |
|
|
|
5-39 years |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
4,585 |
|
|
|
4,114 |
|
|
|
2-10 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,556 |
|
|
|
18,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(8,409 |
) |
|
|
(7,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11,147 |
|
|
$ |
11,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002 amounted to $679, $872 and $1,008, respectively.
F-17
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of deposit balances, by type, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Demand deposits
|
|
$ |
87,776 |
|
|
$ |
85,681 |
|
NOW
|
|
|
22,460 |
|
|
|
24,581 |
|
Regular and other savings
|
|
|
95,875 |
|
|
|
96,118 |
|
Money market deposits
|
|
|
53,167 |
|
|
|
50,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-certificate accounts
|
|
|
259,278 |
|
|
|
256,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term certificates less than $100,000
|
|
|
97,114 |
|
|
|
93,643 |
|
Term certificates of $100,000 or more
|
|
|
40,107 |
|
|
|
30,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total certificate accounts
|
|
|
137,221 |
|
|
|
123,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$ |
396,499 |
|
|
$ |
380,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of term certificate accounts by maturity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Within 1 year
|
|
$ |
98,965 |
|
|
|
2.22 |
% |
|
$ |
89,584 |
|
|
|
2.25 |
% |
Over 1 year to 3 years
|
|
|
32,767 |
|
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
28,633 |
|
|
|
3.47 |
|
Over 3 years to 5 years
|
|
|
5,489 |
|
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
|
5,566 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
137,221 |
|
|
|
2.42 |
% |
|
$ |
123,783 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS |
Short-term borrowings consist of Federal Home Loan Bank
(FHLB) advances in the amount of $4,250 at
December 31, 2004. These advances mature within one year
and have a weighted average rate of 2.53% at December 31,
2004. The advances are secured by a blanket lien on qualified
collateral as described in Note 11.
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
FHLB fixed-rate advances
|
|
$ |
72,000 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
Subordinated debt issued to Trust Subsidiary
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
81,000 |
|
|
$ |
45,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
FHLB Advances
Additional information pertaining to FHLB advances at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
Maturity Date |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
Amount | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2006
|
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
% |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
% |
2007
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
3.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009*
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
2011*
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
72,000 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
% |
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
All advances are callable during 2005. |
The Bank also has an available line of credit with the FHLB at
an interest rate that adjusts daily. At December 31, 2004
and 2003, borrowings under the line were limited to $500, none
of which was outstanding.
FHLB borrowings are limited to 2% of the Banks total
assets. All borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank are
secured by a blanket lien on qualified collateral, defined
principally as 75% of the carrying value of first mortgage loans
on owner-occupied residential property. At December 31,
2004 and 2003, the carrying amount of assets qualifying as
collateral for FHLB advances amounted to $220,513 and $167,559,
respectively.
During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company raised net
proceeds of $8.7 million in a sale of $9.0 million of
subordinated debentures to Benjamin Franklin Capital
Trust I (the Trust), a wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company. The Trust funded the purchase by participating
in a pooled offering of 9,000 capital securities representing
preferred ownership interests in the assets of the Trust with a
liquidation value of $1,000 each. Using interest payments made
by the Company on the debentures, the Trust will pay quarterly
dividends to preferred security holders. The percentage rate of
interest payable on the subordinated debentures and the
cumulative dividends payable quarterly on the preferred
securities is 6.94% for the first five years and thereafter will
be at a rate equal to the three month Libor rate plus 3.45%. The
Company has the option to defer interest payments on the
subordinated debentures for up to five years and, accordingly,
the Trust may defer dividend distributions for up to five years.
The debentures and the preferred securities mature in
November 2032 unless the Company elects and obtains
regulatory approval to accelerate the maturity date to
November 2007 or thereafter.
The outstanding preferred securities are classified as
subordinated debt and may be included in regulatory Tier 1
capital (See Note 14), subject to a limitation that such
amounts not exceed 25% of Tier 1 capital. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, preferred securities
aggregating $9,000 and $8,945, respectively, are included in
Tier 1 capital. Deferred debt financing costs are included
in other assets and are amortized over the life of the
debentures.
F-19
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Allocation of the federal and state income taxes between current
and deferred portions is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
809 |
|
|
$ |
863 |
|
|
$ |
1,304 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,053 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(221 |
) |
|
State
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(481 |
) |
Change in valuation reserve
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
(1,005 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax provision
|
|
$ |
892 |
|
|
$ |
819 |
|
|
$ |
443 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reasons for the differences between the statutory federal
income tax rate and the effective tax rates are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Statutory rate
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal tax
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
Change in valuation reserve
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
Officers life insurance
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rates
|
|
|
34.6 |
% |
|
|
32.7 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The components of the net deferred tax asset
(liability) are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax liability:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
(1,181 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,153 |
) |
|
State
|
|
|
(384 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,565 |
) |
|
|
(1,523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
3,547 |
|
|
|
3,339 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,978 |
|
|
|
3,711 |
|
Valuation reserve
|
|
|
(2,289 |
) |
|
|
(2,273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax effect of each item that gives rise to deferred taxes
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$ |
1,212 |
|
|
$ |
959 |
|
Employee benefit plans
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(615 |
) |
|
|
(604 |
) |
Net deferred loan costs
|
|
|
(470 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(353 |
) |
Capital loss carryforward
|
|
|
2,289 |
|
|
|
2,273 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
2,188 |
|
Valuation reserve
|
|
|
(2,289 |
) |
|
|
(2,273 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
(85 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, the Company has a capital loss
carryover of $6,733 available to offset future capital gains, of
which $6,701 expires in 2006 and $32 expires in 2009. The change
in the valuation reserve for the years ended December 31,
2004 and 2003 is due to the change in the capital loss
carryforward.
The federal income tax reserve for loan losses at the
Banks base year amounted to $3,055. If any portion of the
reserve is used for purposes other than to absorb loan losses,
approximately 150% of the amount actually used (limited to the
amount of the reserve) would be subject to taxation in the year
in which used. As the Bank intends to use the reserve only to
absorb loan losses, a deferred tax liability of $1,253 has not
been provided.
|
|
13. |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
In the normal course of business, there are outstanding
commitments which are not reflected in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.
F-21
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Bank is a party to financial instruments with
off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet
the financing needs of its customers. These financial
instruments include commitments to extend credit and advance
funds on outstanding lines-of-credit. Such commitments involve,
to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in
excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance
sheets.
The Banks exposure to credit loss is represented by the
contractual amount of the commitments. The Bank uses the same
credit policies in making commitments as it does for
on-balance-sheet instruments.
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the following financial
instruments were outstanding whose contract amounts represent
credit risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Commitments to grant loans
|
|
$ |
15,470 |
|
|
$ |
11,567 |
|
Commitments to purchase loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,953 |
|
Unadvanced funds on construction loans
|
|
|
20,338 |
|
|
|
10,264 |
|
Unadvanced funds on home equity lines-of-credit
|
|
|
28,260 |
|
|
|
24,812 |
|
Unadvanced funds on commercial lines-of-credit
|
|
|
4,391 |
|
|
|
3,717 |
|
Unadvanced funds on personal lines-of-credit
|
|
|
2,130 |
|
|
|
2,200 |
|
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a
customer as long as there is no violation of any condition
established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed
expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require
payment of a fee. The commitments for lines-of-credit may expire
without being drawn upon, therefore, the total commitment
amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.
The Bank evaluates each customers credit worthiness on a
case-by-case basis. Funds disbursed under commitments to grant
loans and home equity lines-of-credit are primarily secured by
real estate, and commercial lines-of-credit are generally
secured by business assets. Personal lines-of-credit are
unsecured.
|
|
|
Derivative financial instruments |
Loan commitments pertaining to loans that the Company is
originating for sale are, by definition, derivative financial
instruments.
The Bank enters into investor loan sale commitments to mitigate
the interest rate risk inherent in fixed-rate loan commitments.
These sale commitments also meet the characteristics of a
derivative financial instrument. These transactions involve both
credit and market risk.
Loan commitments with individual borrowers require the Bank to
originate a loan upon completion of various underwriting
requirements, and may lock an interest rate at the time of
commitment. In turn, the Bank generally enters into investor
loan sale commitments which represent agreements to sell these
loans to investors at a predetermined price. If the individual
loan is not available for sale (i.e. the loan does not
close), the Bank may fill the commitment with a similar loan, or
pay a fee to terminate the contract. At December 31, 2004
and 2003, the Bank had $1,145 and $715, respectively, in
commitments to grant mortgage loans under rate lock agreements
with borrowers. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Bank had
$1,145 and $715, respectively, in outstanding investor loan sale
commitments. The fair value of these derivative financial
instruments is zero at the date of commitment and subsequent
changes are not material.
F-22
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Various legal claims also arise from time to time in the normal
course of business which, in the opinion of management, will
have no material effect on the Companys consolidated
financial statements.
|
|
14. |
MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS |
The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory
capital requirements administered by the federal banking
agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can
initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary
actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct
material effect on the Companys and the Banks
consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy
guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective
action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital
guidelines that involve quantitative measures of its assets,
liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated
under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and
classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the
regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.
Mutual holding companies are not covered by the prompt
corrective action provisions of the capital guidelines.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure
capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain
minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the following table) of
total and Tier 1 capital (as defined) to risk-weighted
assets (as defined) and of Tier 1 capital to average assets
(as defined). Management believes, as of December 31, 2004
and 2003, that the Company and the Bank meet all capital
adequacy requirements to which they are subject.
As of December 31, 2004, the most recent notification from
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank
as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the
Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1
risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the
following table. There are no conditions or events since the
notification that management believes have changed the
Banks category. The Companys and the Banks
actual capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2004
and 2003 are also presented in the table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to Be | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Capitalized | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Prompt | |
|
|
|
|
Minimum Capital | |
|
Corrective Action | |
|
|
Actual | |
|
Requirements | |
|
Provisions | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
40,875 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
% |
|
$ |
26,200 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
40,022 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
26,125 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
32,656 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
37,703 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
13,100 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
36,850 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
13,062 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
19,594 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
37,703 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
20,545 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
36,850 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
20,513 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
25,641 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
F-23
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum to Be | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well Capitalized | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Prompt | |
|
|
|
|
Minimum Capital | |
|
Corrective Action | |
|
|
Actual | |
|
Requirements | |
|
Provisions | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
Amount | |
|
Ratio | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk weighted assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
38,357 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
$ |
21,647 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
37,717 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
21,647 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
$ |
27,058 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Tier 1 capital to risk weighted assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
35,779 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
10,823 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
35,194 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
10,823 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
16,235 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Tier 1 capital to average assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
35,779 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
18,461 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
35,194 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
18,416 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
23,020 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
15. |
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS |
The Bank had provided pension benefits for eligible employees
electing participation through the Savings Banks Employee
Retirement Associations (SBERA) Pension Plan (the
Plan). Effective December 31, 2000, the Bank
elected to curtail the pension plan subject to the Banks
capital to assets ratio exceeding 7%. As the Bank exceeded the
required capital ratio during the year ended December 31,
2002, a curtailment loss of $741 was recognized. Effective
August 14, 2003, assets of the Plan were fully settled and
allocated to the participants.
The Bank adopted a 401(k) savings plan, which provides for
voluntary contributions by participating employees up to
seventy-five percent of their compensation, subject to certain
limitations. Under the terms of the plan, the Bank at its
discretion will match two hundred percent of an employees
contribution to the 401(k) plan subject to a maximum of 6% of
the employees compensation. Total expense under the 401(k)
plan for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
amounted to $334, $437 and $413, respectively.
|
|
|
Supplemental executive plan |
The Bank has adopted a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan,
which provides for certain of the Banks executives to
receive monthly benefits upon retirement, subject to certain
limitations as set forth in the Plan. The present value of these
future benefits is accrued over the executives terms of
employment, and the expense for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 amounted to $197, $101 and
$70, respectively.
|
|
|
Executive employment agreement |
The Bank has entered into an Executive Employment Agreement with
the President which expires on December 31, 2006 and
provides for, among other things, an annual base salary and
severance upon termination of employment. However, such
employment may be terminated for cause, as defined, without
F-24
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
incurring any continuing obligation. The agreement also provides
for automatic extensions for one year on the anniversary date of
the agreement.
|
|
16. |
LOANS TO RELATED PARTIES |
In the ordinary course of business, the Bank grants loans to its
officers and directors and their affiliates as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Beginning balance
|
|
$ |
2,563 |
|
|
$ |
2,759 |
|
Originations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,216 |
|
Payments and change in status
|
|
|
(1,448 |
) |
|
|
(1,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
1,115 |
|
|
$ |
2,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17. |
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
The fair value of a financial instrument is the current amount
that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a
forced liquidation. Fair value is best determined based upon
quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no
quoted market prices for the Companys various financial
instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not
available, fair values are based on estimates using present
value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are
significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the
discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly,
the fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate
settlement of the instrument. SFAS No. 107 excludes
certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments
from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate
fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the
underlying fair value of the Company.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company
in estimating fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts of
these instruments approximate fair values.
Securities: Fair values for securities, excluding
restricted equity securities, are based on quoted market prices.
The carrying value of restricted equity securities approximates
fair value based on the redemption provisions of the issuers.
Loans: For variable-rate loans that reprice
frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair
values are based on carrying values. Fair values for residential
mortgage loans and certain consumer loans are generally based on
quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction with
securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan
characteristics. Fair values for commercial real estate and
investment property mortgage loans, commercial and industrial
loans and certain consumer loans are estimated using discounted
cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered
for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit
quality. Fair values for non-performing loans are estimated
using the lower of underlying collateral values or cost.
Deposits: The fair values disclosed for
non-certificate accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount
payable on demand at the reporting date which is the carrying
amount. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are
estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies
interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a
schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time
deposits.
F-25
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN BANCORP, M.H.C. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Short-term borrowings: The carrying amounts of
short-term borrowings approximate fair value.
Long-term debt: Fair values of long-term debt are
estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the
Companys current incremental borrowing rates for similar
types of borrowing arrangements.
Accrued interest: The carrying amount of accrued
interest approximates fair value.
Off-balance-sheet instruments: Fair values for
off-balance-sheet lending commitments are based on fees
currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into
account the remaining terms of the agreements and the
counterparties credit standing. The fair value of these
instruments is not material.
The estimated fair values, and related carrying amounts, of the
Companys financial instruments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Amount | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
14,204 |
|
|
$ |
14,204 |
|
|
$ |
35,485 |
|
|
$ |
35,485 |
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
86,070 |
|
|
|
86,070 |
|
|
|
102,646 |
|
|
|
102,646 |
|
|
Securities held to maturity
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
Restricted equity securities
|
|
|
6,975 |
|
|
|
6,975 |
|
|
|
7,222 |
|
|
|
7,222 |
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
383,373 |
|
|
|
383,875 |
|
|
|
288,862 |
|
|
|
288,535 |
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
396,499 |
|
|
|
395,947 |
|
|
|
380,257 |
|
|
|
381,479 |
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
81,000 |
|
|
|
80,337 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
46,461 |
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
F-26
Benjamin Franklin Bancorp, Inc.
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Year Ended
December 31, 2004
Exhibits Filed Herewith
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
10.1.1 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement with Thomas R. Venables. |
|
10.1.2 |
|
|
Form of Employment Agreement with Claire S. Bean. |
|
23.1 |
|
|
Consent of Wolf & Company, P.C., independent
registered public accounting firm. |
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002. |
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002. |
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |