Back to GetFilings.com
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the fiscal year ended January 1, 2005 |
|
or |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number 001-15023
THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
04-2591416 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
16 Yankee Candle Way, South Deerfield, Massachusetts
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
01373
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(413) 665-8306
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of
the Act:
|
|
|
Common Stock, $0.01 par value
(Title of each class)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange, Inc.
(Name of each exchange where registered) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in
Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
Based on the closing sale price of $29.01 per share on
July 2, 2004, the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal quarter,
the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock
held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $1,398,392,470.
On March 7, 2005 there were outstanding
46,391,848 shares of the Registrants Common Stock.
Documents incorporated by reference (to the extent indicated
herein):
Registrants proxy statement (specified portions) with
respect to the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on
June 2, 2005 are incorporated into Part III.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains a number of
forward-looking statements. Any statements contained herein,
including without limitation statements to the effect that The
Yankee Candle Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Yankee
Candle, the Company, we, and
us) or its management believes,
expects, anticipates, plans
and similar expressions that relate to prospective events or
developments should be considered forward-looking statements.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the
statement was made. There are a number of important factors that
could cause our actual results to differ materially from those
indicated by such forward-looking statements. These factors
include, without limitation, those set forth below in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Future Operating
Results. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I
We are the leading designer, manufacturer and branded marketer
of premium scented candles, based on sales, in the giftware
industry. We have a 35-year history of offering our distinctive
products and marketing them as affordable luxuries and
consumable gifts. Our candle products are available in
approximately 185 fragrances and include a wide variety of jar
candles, Samplers® votive candles, Tarts® wax
potpourri, pillars and other candle products, the vast majority
of which are marketed under the Yankee Candle® brand. We
also sell a wide range of coordinated candle and home décor
accessories and have extended our brand into the growing premium
home fragrance market segment with products such as our
Housewarmer® electric home fragrancers, Yankee Candle®
branded potpourri, sachets, room sprays and linen sprays, Yankee
Candle Car Jars® air fresheners and Yankee
Candletm
Bath personal care products. We have a vertically integrated
business model that enables us to manufacture and distribute
high quality products, provide excellent customer service and
achieve cost efficiencies.
Our multi-channel distribution strategy enables us to offer
Yankee Candle® products through a wide variety of locations
and venues. We sell our products through an extensive and
growing wholesale customer network of approximately
15,600 stores in North America, primarily in non-mall
locations, and through our growing retail store base located
primarily in malls. As of January 1, 2005, we had 345
Company-owned and operated stores in 43 states. We have
grown our retail store count 28% annually over the past five
years and opened 60 new retail stores and closed one
underperforming retail store in 2004. In addition, we own and
operate a 90,000 square foot flagship store in South
Deerfield, Massachusetts, a major tourist destination in
Massachusetts. We also sell our products directly to consumers
through our catalogs and our Internet web site at
www.yankeecandle.com. Outside North America, we sell our
products through international distributors and to an
international wholesale customer network of approximately 2,200
store locations (through our distribution center located in
Bristol, England).
Since 1999, we have experienced compound annual sales growth of
16% and compound annual pretax income growth of 20%. Each of our
distribution channels has contributed to this growth. Retail,
which includes our catalog and Internet business, has achieved
18% compound annual sales growth since 1999 and accounted for
51% of our $554.2 million total sales in 2004. Wholesale,
which includes international operations and has generated higher
segment margins than our retail channel, has achieved a 14%
compound annual sales growth since 1999 and accounted for 49% of
total sales in 2004. In 2004, our sales increased 9% over 2003,
comprised of a 6% increase in retail sales and a 12% increase in
wholesale sales. In 2004, net income increased 11% over 2003. We
believe our growth was primarily based on the strength of the
Yankee Candle® brand, our commitment to product quality and
innovation, the efficiency of our vertically integrated
manufacturing and logistics operations and the success of our
multi-channel distribution strategy.
Industry Overview
Yankee Candle operates in the domestic giftware industry, a
$54.3 billion market in 2002 (latest available data),
according to Unity Marketing, an independent research firm.
Sub-segments within this industry in which we compete include
the total candle, premium scented candle and home fragrance
segments. According to Kline & Company, Inc., an
international consulting firm, the domestic market for candles
has grown at an approximately 2% compound annual growth rate
from 1999 to 2003 to reach approximately $3.1 billion in
2003. According to Klines most recent home fragrance study
issued in 2004, the premium scented candle segment, in which we
compete, grew at an approximately 5% compound annual growth rate
from 1999 to 2003. Kline has projected that the premium scented
candle segment will continue to grow at a compound annual growth
rate of approximately 3% from 2004 to 2008. We also compete in
the growing home fragrance market segment, which according to
Kline has grown at an approximately 4% compound annual growth
rate from 1999 to 2003 to reach approximately $5.5 billion
($2.4 billion excluding candles).
2
We expect the premium scented candle market to continue to grow
more quickly than the total candle market, and the home
fragrance market to grow at least as quickly as the premium
scented candle market, based upon favorable industry factors,
including the continued interest of consumers in home décor
and branded gifting, and the year-round usage of branded scented
candles as an affordable luxury.
Products
We develop and introduce new products and fragrances throughout
the year. We offer approximately 1,800 stock-keeping units
(SKUs) of Yankee Candle manufactured products. Virtually all of
our candle products are marketed as Yankee Candle® branded
products primarily under the trade names Housewarmer®, Home
Classicstm,
YCtm,
Stripes®,
Swirlstm,
Chandlers
Reservetm,
Plymouth
Baytm,
Country Kitchen® and Aroma
Formulatm
and include the following product styles:
|
|
|
|
|
Housewarmer® Jar Candles scented candles in
decorative glass jars; available in 22 oz., 14.5 oz., and 3.7
oz. sizes. |
|
|
|
Samplers® votive candles for sampling different
fragrances. |
|
|
|
Tapers the oldest candle style. |
|
|
|
Pillars both smooth-sided standard pillars and
textured designer pillars. |
|
|
|
Tarts® Wax Potpourri scented wax without wicks
that releases its fragrance when melted and warmed in a
potpourri pot. |
|
|
|
Scented Tea Lights small, colored and scented
candles in clear cups made for home fragrancing. |
|
|
|
Tart® Warmers unscented candles in aluminum
cups made to heat potpourri burners. |
|
|
|
Kindle Candles® unscented wax in a paper cup
for use in a fireplace or campfire as a firestarter. |
Our candle products are generally available in a wide range of
fragrances and colors. We have available approximately 185
fragrances for our retail stores. In addition, approximately 90
of our best-selling Housewarmer® fragrances are available
nationwide to our wholesale customers, together with numerous
special editions and seasonal fragrances. In addition to
distinctive fragrances, we promote our brand through consistent
product packaging and labeling and the use of a distinctive
trade dress. We also package our products in attractive gift
baskets and other containers and offer glassware accessories and
other coordinated candle-related and home décor accessories
in dozens of exclusive patterns, colors and styles, including
jar toppers, taper holders, pillar and jar bases, jar shades,
tea light holders, potpourri burners and Samplers® votive
candleholders.
In addition to our core candle business, we have successfully
extended the Yankee Candle® brand into the growing home
fragrance segment and other fragrance-based product categories.
Examples of our non-candle product portfolio include our
Housewarmer® electric home fragrancer; our Yankee
Candle® branded line of potpourri, sachets, room sprays,
linen sprays and passive diffusers; Yankee Candle® Car
Jars® air fresheners; and our Yankee
Candletm
Bath line of personal care products. In 2004 we continued to
expand our home fragrance offerings, adding a number of new
fragrances and styles to our electric home fragrancer and other
product lines and introducing new products to our portfolio. We
plan to further leverage our brand and increase our offerings in
this segment in 2005 by introducing new products and fragrances,
including an enhanced version of our electric home fragrancer.
We seek to maintain a moderate price for almost all of our
products in order to reinforce our customers perception of
our products as affordable. As a result, our retail prices for
our core candle products generally range from $1.20 for a
Tarts® wax potpourri to $20.99 for a 22 oz.
Housewarmer® jar candle.
3
Retail Operations
Our retail operations include retail stores, none of which are
franchised, catalog and Internet operations and Chandlers
restaurant. From 1999 to 2004, sales from our retail division
have grown at a compound annual growth rate of 18% from
$123.2 million in 1999 to $283.5 million in 2004 and
increased from 47% of our total sales in 1999 to 51% in 2004.
Moreover, in 2004 our retail stores that were open for the full
year, excluding the South Deerfield flagship store, achieved
average sales per selling square foot of $594.
We opened 60 new retail stores during 2004, closed one
underperforming retail store and ended the year with 345 retail
stores in 43 states, including two Old Farmers
Almanac test concept stores. In addition, we are also testing
certain outlet locations on a temporary basis to determine
long-term viability. In opening new stores, we target high
traffic retail locations in malls, tourist destinations and
selected non-mall locations, including lifestyle centers. Of our
345 retail stores, 257 are located in malls. We plan to open
approximately 46 additional stores during 2005, including a new
65,000 square foot flagship store in Williamsburg, VA.
The non-mall store count includes our South Deerfield, MA
flagship store, which is a unique store. We believe that our
flagship store is the worlds largest candle and
holiday-themed store with approximately 90,000 square feet
of retail and entertainment space. This store promotes Yankee
Candles brand image and culture and is an important
testing ground for our new product introductions. The store
carries approximately 22,000 SKUs of gift items and generates
approximately 51% of its revenues from the sale of Yankee Candle
manufactured products. The store is a major tourist destination
and provides visitors with a total shopping and entertainment
experience including the Yankee Candlemaking Museum and a
240-seat restaurant. The flagship store also includes two
store within a store concepts: our Yankee
Candletm
Home store, which showcases home goods, accessories, furnishings
and decorative accents in sophisticated country décor
settings, and an Old Farmers Almanac General Store® which
features an assortment of products with a nostalgic country
general store theme, including an exclusive line of candles,
decorative home items, specialty foods, clothing and holiday
ideas. We believe that each of these concepts are important
contributors to our flagship store and will enable us to
continue to test market new products and merchandising concepts.
Excluding the South Deerfield flagship store, the average store
size for our 344 retail stores at the end of 2004 was
1,653 square feet. Our retail stores other than the South
Deerfield store typically offer Yankee Candle products in
approximately 175 fragrances and carry approximately 1,000 SKUs
of candles and approximately 900 SKUs of candle accessories.
Outstanding customer service and a knowledgeable employee base
are key elements of our retail strategy. We emphasize formal
employee training, particularly with respect to product quality,
candle manufacturing and the heritage of Yankee Candle. We also
have a well-developed, eleven day training program for managers
and assistant managers and an in-store training program for
sales associates. Our high customer service standards are an
integral part of our ongoing success. Each store is responsible
for implementing and maintaining these customer service
standards.
As part of our retail division we market our products through
our catalogs and Internet web site. Our catalog and Internet
business generated $17.3 million of sales in 2004, a
decrease of approximately 6.0% from 2003. Our catalogs feature a
wide selection of our most popular products, together with
additional products and offerings exclusive to our catalog
channel. We believe there are continuing opportunities to grow
our catalog and Internet businesses by adding additional
products and accessories, new concepts and expanding our mailing
lists. We further believe that the catalog constitutes an
important marketing tool, serving to increase the awareness and
strength of the Yankee Candle® brand and driving sales to
our retail stores and Internet web site.
4
Our web site, www.yankeecandle.com, provides our on-line
customers with an easy and convenient way to purchase a wide
variety of our most popular products. This web site also offers
features designed to promote sales and provide enhanced customer
service and convenience, including personalized guest
registration, gift cards and other gift giving programs, a store
locator, decorating ideas, sites dedicated to corporate gifts,
weddings and other customized purchasing opportunities and a
personalized candle configuring capability that enables users to
design and purchase their own custom-labeled Samplers®
votive candles to commemorate special events such as weddings.
In addition to our consumer-oriented web site, we have a
separate business-to-business web site dedicated to our
wholesale customers that offers such features as on-line
ordering, order status information, purchase history and an
enhanced dealer locator program. We continually upgrade our web
site in order to better serve our retail and wholesale customers.
Wholesale Operations
Our wholesale strategy focuses on gift, home décor and
other image appropriate retailers. The wholesale business is an
integral part of our growth strategy and, together with our
other distribution channels, helps to further build our brand
awareness. From 1999 to 2004, sales from our wholesale accounts
have grown at a compound annual growth rate of 14% from
$138.9 million in 1999 to $270.7 million in 2004 and
changed from 53% to 49% of our total sales. Our wholesale
customers have approximately 15,600 locations in North America,
approximately 92% of which are non-mall. We believe that as a
result of our strong brand name, the popularity and
profitability of our products and our emphasis on customer
service, our wholesale customers are extremely loyal, with
approximately 60% of them having been customers for over five
years. No customer accounted for more than 7% of our total
company sales in 2004.
The strength of our brand, the profitability and quality of our
products, and our successful in-store merchandising and display
system have made us the top selling brand for many of our
wholesale customers. Since 1993, we have been continuously
ranked first in gift store sales in the domestic candle category
and have consistently been ranked either first or second in
product reorders across all giftware categories by Giftbeat, a
giftware industry publication. In addition, we have consistently
been ranked as the most profitable product line across all
giftware categories since Giftbeat introduced that survey
category several years ago.
We actively seek to increase wholesale sales through our
innovative product display systems, promotional programs, new
products and telemarketing initiatives. We promote a Shop
Within A Shop display system to our wholesale customers
which presents our products in a distinctive wood hutch. We
recommend that dealers invest in a minimum of an 8- to 12-foot
display system which holds $6,000 to $9,000 of Yankee
Candle® products at suggested retail prices. This display
system enhances Yankee Candles brand recognition in the
marketplace and we believe positively impacts our wholesale
sales. We have also introduced new products and implemented a
number of promotional programs to increase the square footage
dedicated to Yankee Candle® products as well as the breadth
of Yankee Candle® products offered by our wholesale
customers. For example, we promote a Fragrance of the
Monthtm
program, with featured fragrance suggestions for each month.
This program encourages dealers to increase their re-order
schedules and implement a proven customer promotion. The
promotion encourages consumers to try different fragrances and
return to the stores more frequently in order to buy the
Fragrance of the
Monthtm.
In addition to specific promotions, we advise our wholesale
customers on an ongoing basis regarding product knowledge,
display suggestions, promotional ideas and geographical consumer
preferences. As one example, we have introduced Yankee Candle
University, a training program with in-depth courses on Yankee
Candle product information, sales tactics and marketing
techniques. We have also established a Wholesale Advisory
Council made up of wholesale customers from across the country,
which provides us with a forum for receiving invaluable feedback
from our wholesale customers while also allowing us to work
jointly with them to develop best practices and
innovative ideas.
We have a selective dealer approval process, designed to apply
consistent nationwide standards for all Yankee Candle authorized
retailers. As a result of our high standards for authorized
retailers, we had bad debt expense of only 0.1% of wholesale
sales in 2004.
5
We use a dedicated in-house direct telemarketing sales force to
service our wholesale customers. In addition, we have several
account managers located in field offices across the United
States to help us service our larger accounts. This provides us
with greater control over the sales process, and allows us to
provide customers with better and more accurate information,
faster order turn-around and improved customer service, to
create more consistent merchandising nationwide and to reduce
costs.
We sell our products in Europe and the Middle East utilizing our
distribution center in the United Kingdom. As of January 1,
2005, this distribution center was selling our products to
approximately 2,200 direct accounts and 21 distributors covering
23 countries. Revenues from our international operations outside
of North America have accounted for less than 3.0% of our total
revenues in each of the last three years.
New Product Development
We have a long history as a product innovator in the premium
candle segment of the giftware industry. We have a strong and
experienced in-house product design and development team
comprised of artists, fragrance specialists, designers,
packagers and buyers who work collaboratively to design new
products that are attractive to customers and can be
manufactured cost-effectively. New products are typically
developed in less than a year.
Our innovation team focuses on several different areas of new
product development. Each year we introduce a number of in-line
extensions of our core candle lines, such as new
Housewarmer® fragrances and the development of exclusive
fragrances and special products for one or both of our retail
and wholesale channels. In addition to new fragrances in our
core Housewarmer® line, our new product development efforts
focus on the addition of new candle lines and offerings. In 2004
these efforts included the introduction of new candle forms such
as our
Swirlstm
(combining two popular and compatible Housewarmer®
fragrances in one candle), Housewarmer®
Accentstm
(a three-wick version of our Housewarmer® candles with a
clean, contemporary look) and Housewarmer® Tins (a
travel-sized candle packaged in small, take-away containers for
optimum convenience). We passed another innovation milestone in
2004 by creating our first-ever value-priced candle, which was
released under a new brand: Plymouth
Baytm.
The Plymouth
Baytm
candle will continue to be tested in 2005 and, if successful,
could provide us with an opportunity to penetrate new
value-oriented distribution channels without utilizing the
Yankee Candle® brand.
Beyond candles, our innovation team continually works to broaden
our product portfolio and continue to extend our brand into the
home fragrancing market segment and other fragrance-related
categories. In 2004 these efforts led to continued expansion of
our electric home fragrancer products and other branded home
fragrance offerings such as potpourri, room sprays and linen
sprays, together with the introduction of new products such as
our passive diffusers.
In 2005, we plan to continue to focus on broadening our product
portfolio in both the candle and home fragrancing segments.
Our expenditures on research and development during the last
three fiscal years have not been material because we have
historically drawn on a broad group of our existing workforce to
participate in research and development initiatives.
Manufacturing
Approximately 74% of our sales in 2004 were generated by
products manufactured at our 294,000 square foot facility
in Whately, Massachusetts. As a vertically integrated
manufacturer, we are able to closely monitor the quality of our
products, more effectively manage inventory and control our
production costs. We believe this is an important competitive
advantage that enables us to ensure high quality products,
maintain affordable pricing and provide reliable customer
service.
6
Our products are manufactured using filled, molded, extruded,
compressed and dipped manufacturing methods. The majority of our
products are filled products which are produced by pouring
colored, scented liquid wax into a glass container with a wick.
Pillars are made by extrusion, in which wax is pressed around a
wick through a die. Tapers are produced through a dipping
process and Tarts® wax potpourri and Samplers® votive
candles are made by compression.
Yankee Candle uses high quality fragrances, premium grade,
highly refined paraffin waxes, and superior wicks and dyes to
create premium (non mass market) products. Our manufacturing
processes are designed to ensure the highest quality and
quantity of candle fragrance, wick quality and placement, color,
fill level, shelf life and burn rate. We are continuously
engaged in efforts to further improve our quality and lower our
costs by using efficient production and distribution methods and
technological advancements.
Suppliers
We maintain strong relationships with our principal fragrance
and wax suppliers. We believe we use the highest-quality
suppliers in our industry and maintain back-up suppliers who are
able to provide services and materials of similar quality. We
have been in the business of manufacturing premium scented
candles for many years and are therefore knowledgeable about the
different levels of quality of raw materials used in
manufacturing candles. We have developed, jointly with our
suppliers, proprietary fragrances which are exclusive to Yankee
Candle. Other raw materials used in the manufacturing process,
including wax, glassware, wick and packaging materials, are
readily available from alternative sources at comparable prices.
In 2004, no single supplier represented more than 9% of our
total cost of goods sold.
Order Processing and Distribution
Our systems allow us to maintain efficient order processing from
the time an order enters the system through shipping and
ultimate payment collection from customers. We operate uniform
computer and communication software systems allowing for online
information access between our headquarters and retail stores.
We use a software package that allows us to forecast demand for
our products and efficiently plan our production schedules. We
also utilize a pick-to-light system which allows Yankee Candle
employees at our distribution center to receive information
directly from the order collection center and quickly identify,
by way of blinking lights, the products and quantity necessary
for a particular order. To accurately track shipments and
provide better service to customers we also use handheld optical
scanners and bar coded labels. Our platform of manufacturing and
distribution software enables us to further enhance our
inventory management and customer service capabilities and also
support a larger infrastructure. We believe that our systems for
the processing and shipment of orders from the distribution
center have enabled us to improve our overall customer service
through enhanced order accuracy and reduced turnaround time.
The products we sell in the United States are generally shipped
by various national small-parcel carriers or other freight
carriers. Our products are shipped to our retail stores on a
fluctuating schedule, with the frequency of deliveries based
upon a stores sales volume and seasonal variances in
demand. We ship to wholesale customers as orders are received.
We believe that our timely and accurate distribution is an
important differentiating factor for our wholesale customers.
This belief is based on numerous conversations between our
management and sales force, on the one hand, and our wholesale
customers, on the other hand.
Intellectual Property
Yankee Candle has obtained 43 U.S. trademark registrations,
including Yankee® (for candles), Yankee Candle®,
Housewarmer®, Stripes®, Country Kitchen®,
Samplers®, Tarts®, Country Classics®, Kindle
Candles® and Car Jars®and has pending several
additional trademark applications with respect to its products.
We also register certain of our trademarks in various foreign
countries. Trademark registrations allow us to use those
trademarks on an exclusive basis in connection with our
products. If we continue to use our trademarks and make all
required filings and payments these trademarks can continue
7
in perpetuity. These registrations are in addition to various
copyright registrations and patents held by us, and all
trademark, copyright and other intellectual property rights of
Yankee Candle under statutory and common law, including those
rights relating to our distinctive trade dress and
our manufacturing and design know how.
We believe that our trademarks and intellectual property rights
are valuable assets and we intend to maintain and renew our
trademarks and their registrations and to vigorously defend them
and all of our intellectual property rights against infringement.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws
and regulations governing the generation, storage, use,
emission, discharge, transportation and disposal of hazardous
materials and the health and safety of our employees. In
addition, we are subject to environmental laws which may require
investigation and cleanup of any contamination at facilities we
own or operate or at third party waste disposal sites we use.
These laws could impose liability even if we did not know of, or
were not responsible for, the contamination.
We have in the past and will in the future incur costs to comply
with environmental laws. We are not, however, currently aware of
any costs or liabilities relating to environmental matters,
including any claims or actions under environmental laws or
obligations to perform any cleanups at any of our facilities or
any third party waste disposal sites, that are expected to have
a material adverse effect on our operations, cash flow or
financial condition. It is possible, however, that such costs or
liabilities may arise in the future.
Competition
We compete generally for the disposable income of consumers with
other manufacturers and retailers in the giftware industry. The
giftware industry is highly competitive with a large number of
both large and small participants. Our products compete with
other scented and unscented candle, home fragrance, and personal
care products and with other gifts within a comparable price
range, like boxes of candy, flowers, wine, fine soap and related
merchandise. Our competitors distribute their products through
independent gift retailers, department stores, mass market
stores and mail order houses and some of our competitors are
part of large, diversified companies having greater financial
resources and a wider range of product offerings than us.
In the premium scented candle segment of the market, in which we
primarily compete, our manufacturing competitors include Blyth
Industries, Inc., as well as many smaller branded manufacturers
and private label manufacturers. We are not aware of any
significant recent consolidation in the manufacturing segment of
the candle market, nor do we anticipate that there will be any
material consolidation based on our current knowledge and
understanding of the market.
Our retail stores compete primarily with specialty candle
retailers and a variety of other retailers including department
stores, gift stores and national specialty retailers that carry
candles along with personal care items, giftware and houseware.
In addition, while we focus primarily on the premium scented
candle segment, candles are also sold outside of that segment by
a variety of retailers including mass merchandisers.
Employees
At January 1, 2005, we employed approximately
2,100 full-time employees and 2,100 part-time
employees. We are not subject to any collective bargaining
agreements, and we believe that our relations with our employees
are good. We also use seasonal and temporary workers, as
necessary, to supplement our labor force during peak selling or
manufacturing seasons.
8
Web Site
Our Internet address is www.yankeecandle.com. We make available
free of charge through our web site our annual reports on
Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current
reports on Form 8-K and amendments to these reports filed
or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as
reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
materials with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We are
not including the information contained on our web site as a
part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. We also include on our web site the
Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted by our Board of
Directors, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the
charters for each of the major committees of our Board of
Directors. In addition, we intend to disclose on our web site
any amendments to, or waivers from, our Code of Business Conduct
and Ethics that are required to be publicly disclosed pursuant
to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the New
York Stock Exchange.
CEO Report
In June 2004 our Chief Executive Officer filed with the New York
Stock Exchange (NYSE) the required CEO Certification
with respect to our prior fiscal year, which certified, without
qualification, as to our compliance with the Corporate
Governance Listing Standards established by the NYSE. This
years filing will be made within thirty days following our
2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, as required by the NYSE.
We own or lease several facilities located in Deerfield and
Whately, Massachusetts, including those described in the table
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type of Facility |
|
Location | |
|
Size | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Manufacturing
|
|
|
Whately, Mass. |
|
|
|
294,000 sq.ft. |
|
Distribution center(1)(2)
|
|
|
South Deerfield, Mass |
|
|
|
256,000 sq ft. |
|
Flagship retail store and restaurant(3)
|
|
|
South Deerfield, Mass. |
|
|
|
90,000 sq.ft. |
|
Corporate offices(1)(4)
|
|
|
South Deerfield, Mass. |
|
|
|
75,000 sq.ft. |
|
Distribution center
|
|
|
South Deerfield, Mass. |
|
|
|
60,000 sq.ft. |
|
Distribution center(5)
|
|
|
Greenfield, Mass. |
|
|
|
60,000 sq.ft. |
|
Employee health and fitness center
|
|
|
South Deerfield, Mass. |
|
|
|
12,000 sq.ft. |
|
Notes:
|
|
(1) |
Leased facility. |
|
(2) |
We have the right under the lease to expand this facility from
time to time. We believe that the facility has the capacity to
be expanded by up to an additional 105,000 sq. ft. |
|
(3) |
This building includes an additional 11,000 sq. ft. of
office space. |
|
(4) |
We have the right under the lease to expand this facility from
time to time. We believe that the facility has the capacity to
be expanded by up to an additional 30,000 square feet. |
|
(5) |
As a result of the acquisition of GBI Marketing, Inc., we
entered into a lease of this facility in 2004. |
We also lease a 62,000 sq. ft. distribution facility in Bristol,
England which the Company began leasing in 2004. At
January 1, 2005, we had 48 months remaining on the
lease of our prior 27,000 sq. ft. distribution
facility in Bristol, England and are actively seeking to sublet
that facility.
We believe these facilities are suitable and adequate to meet
our current needs. In addition to the foregoing facilities, and
the retail stores referenced below, we own various other
properties in the Deerfield/ Whately area, none of which are
material to our operations.
9
Other than the South Deerfield flagship store and three smaller
retail locations, we lease our retail stores. Initial store
leases for mall locations typically range from eight to ten
years. For non-mall locations, most leases are five years, with
a five-year renewal option.
Our retail stores were located in the following 43 states
as of January 1, 2005:
Store Count
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State |
|
Mall | |
|
Non-Mall | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ALABAMA
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
ARIZONA
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
ARKANSAS
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
CALIFORNIA
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
COLORADO
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
CONNECTICUT
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
DELAWARE
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
FLORIDA
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
GEORGIA
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
ILLINOIS
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
INDIANA
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
IOWA
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
KANSAS
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
KENTUCKY
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
LOUISIANA
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
MAINE
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
MARYLAND
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
MASSACHUSETTS
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
MICHIGAN
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
MINNESOTA
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
MISSISSIPPI
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
MISSOURI
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
NEBRASKA
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
NEVADA
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
NEW HAMPSHIRE
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
NEW JERSEY
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
NEW YORK
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
NORTH CAROLINA
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
NORTH DAKOTA
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
OHIO
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
OKLAHOMA
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
PENNSYLVANIA
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
RHODE ISLAND
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
SOUTH CAROLINA
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
SOUTH DAKOTA
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
TENNESSEE
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
TEXAS
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
UTAH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
VERMONT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
VIRGINIA
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
WASHINGTON
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
WEST VIRGINIA
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
WISCONSIN
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTALS
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
We are involved from time to time in routine legal proceedings
relating to our business. We believe that none of these legal
proceedings will have a material adverse impact on our results
of operations, cash flow or financial condition.
|
|
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
Our annual meeting of stockholders will be held on June 2,
2005. No matter was submitted to a vote of security holders in
the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended January 1, 2005.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following table sets forth the names, ages and positions of
our executive officers as of March 7, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Position |
|
|
| |
|
|
Craig W. Rydin
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
Harlan M. Kent
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
President |
Robert R. Spellman
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
Stephen Farley
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Retail |
Paul J. Hill
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Supply Chain |
Lori A. Klimach
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Wholesale |
Martha S. LaCroix
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, Human Resources |
James A. Perley
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel |
CRAIG W. RYDIN is the Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining Yankee Candle in April
2001, Mr. Rydin was the President of the Away From Home
food services division of Campbell Soup Company since 1998, and
President of the Godiva Chocolatier division of Campbell from
1996 to 1998. Prior to Godiva, Mr. Rydin held a number of
senior management positions at Pepperidge Farm, Inc., also a
part of Campbell.
HARLAN M. KENT is the President. Mr. Kent joined Yankee
Candle in June 2001 as Senior Vice President, Wholesale, and was
promoted to his current position in July 2004. Prior to joining
Yankee Candle, Mr. Kent was Senior Vice President and
General Manager of the Wholesale Division of Totes Isotoner
Corporation from 1997 to 2001, and Vice President of Global
Sales and Marketing for the Winchester Division of Olin
Corporation from 1995 to 1997. Mr. Kent has also held a
number of senior marketing and strategic planning positions at
both the Campbell Soup Company and its Pepperidge Farm Division.
ROBERT R. SPELLMAN is a Director and the Senior Vice President,
Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Yankee
Candle in November 1998, Mr. Spellman was Senior Vice
President of Finance of Staples, Inc. from 1988 through 1994,
and Chief Financial Officer of Star Markets Company, Inc. from
1994 through 1998. In October 2004, Mr. Spellman announced
his intention to retire from Yankee Candle, which retirement is
anticipated to become effective in early 2005.
STEPHEN FARLEY is the Senior Vice President, Retail. Prior to
joining Yankee Candle in January 2005, Mr. Farley served as
Executive Vice President, Marketing and Merchandising for The
Bombay Company, a leading specialty retailer of home accessories
and home décor. Prior to joining The Bombay Company in
2002, he served as Chief Marketing Officer for J.C. Penney, one
of Americas largest department store, catalog and
e-commerce retailers. Mr. Farley also previously held
various senior leadership positions with Payless Shoe Source,
Inc., Pizza Hut and the leading marketing and advertising
agencies of Earle Palmer Brown and Saatchi & Saatchi.
11
PAUL J. HILL is the Senior Vice President, Supply Chain. Prior
to joining Yankee Candle in October 2000, Mr. Hill was
employed by Kraft Foods, Inc. from 1987 to 2000. At Kraft,
Mr. Hill held various supply chain and strategy positions.
His last assignment with Kraft, from 1997 to 2000, was as the
Plant Manager at one of the largest plants in Krafts
system.
LORI A. KLIMACH is the Senior Vice President, Wholesale. Prior
to joining Yankee Candle in October 2004, Ms. Klimach
served as Vice President of Sales for Worldwide Consumer
Medicines for Bristol-Myers Squibb, a leading branded
pharmaceutical company, where she was also the General Manager
of Consumer Medicines Canadian Division. Prior to joining
Bristol-Myers Squibb in 2002, Ms. Klimach served as Vice
President of Worldwide Business Development for
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies. Ms. Klimach also
held numerous senior sales and marketing positions with
Neutrogena Corporation, Tambrands Corporation and American
Cyanamid.
MARTHA S. LACROIX is the Senior Vice President, Human Resources.
Ms. LaCroix joined Yankee Candle in February 1993 as
Director of Employee Relations and has since held various
positions of increasing responsibility in the Companys
Human Resources Department. Ms. LaCroix was appointed Vice
President, Human Resources in December 2000 and promoted to her
current position in 2003.
JAMES A. PERLEY is the Senior Vice President, General Counsel of
the Company. Prior to joining Yankee Candle in September 1999,
Mr. Perley was Vice President and General Counsel of Star
Markets Company, Inc., where he served from 1997 to 1999. From
1987 to 1997, Mr. Perley was a member of the Boston-based
law firm of Hale and Dorr LLP, where he served as an Associate
from 1987-1992 and as a Junior Partner from 1992-1997.
There are no family relationships among any of the executive
officers.
PART II
|
|
Item 5. |
Market for the Registrants Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities |
Our common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange
since July 1, 1999 under the symbol YCC. For
the fiscal periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per
share of the common stock as reported on the New York Stock
Exchange Composite Transaction Reporting System were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005 |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
29.50 |
|
|
$ |
26.15 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
31.06 |
|
|
|
25.90 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
30.42 |
|
|
|
26.42 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
34.02 |
|
|
|
27.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 |
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
18.19 |
|
|
$ |
15.25 |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
24.20 |
|
|
|
16.64 |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
26.42 |
|
|
|
22.26 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
30.00 |
|
|
|
25.35 |
|
On March 7, 2005, the closing sale price as reported on the
New York Stock Exchange-Composite Transaction Reporting System
for our common stock was $31.75 per share. As of
March 7, 2005, there were 586 holders of record of our
common stock. This does not include the number of persons whose
stock is in nominee or street name accounts through
brokers.
12
We have never paid a cash dividend on our common stock as a
public company. Instead, we have retained earnings to repurchase
our common stock and for the future operation of our business.
However, while we will continue to retain earnings for use in
the operation and expansion of our business, we have also
decided to further increase shareholder returns by initiating an
annual cash dividend in 2005. Accordingly, on February 14,
2005 our Board of Directors authorized us to initiate an annual
cash dividend at the annual rate of $0.25 per share of
outstanding common stock. The first semi-annual payment of
$0.125 per share will be paid on June 1, 2005, to
shareholders of record on May 11, 2005. Under the terms of
our existing Credit Facility, we may not declare or pay
dividends on our common stock unless our Consolidated Net Worth
(as defined in our Credit Facility) is more than the sum of
$100 million plus 25% of 2004 net income, plus 25% of
net income for each fiscal quarter thereafter. Our net income
for fiscal 2004 was $82.7 million, and 25% of 2004 net
income was therefore approximately $20.7 million. As of
January 1, 2005, our Consolidated Net Worth was
approximately $179.7 million, in excess of the
$120.7 million required under our Credit Facility for the
declaration or payment of dividends. We anticipate that our
Consolidated Net Worth as of June 1, 2005, the date on
which the first semi-annual payment is scheduled to be made,
will likewise exceed the required amount under our Credit
Facility. While it is our current intention to pay annual cash
dividends in years following 2005, any decision to pay future
cash dividends will be made by our Board of Directors and will
depend upon our earnings, financial condition and other factors.
On February 12, 2004 we announced that our Board of
Directors had approved a stock repurchase program authorizing us
to repurchase up to $100 million of Yankee Candle common
stock. During fiscal 2004, we repurchased a total of
3,480,149 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase
price of approximately $100 million at an average price per
share of approximately $28.73. This share repurchase program
followed a $100 million share repurchase program authorized
and completed in 2003. Our 2004 program was completed as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Funds | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares | |
|
Available to | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as Part of | |
|
Repurchase Shares | |
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Average Price | |
|
Publicly Announced | |
|
Under the Plans | |
Period |
|
Shares Purchased(1) | |
|
Paid per Share | |
|
Plans or Programs(2) | |
|
or Programs | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
1/4/04-2/7/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,000,000 |
|
2/8/04-3/6/04
|
|
|
500,200 |
|
|
$ |
28.52 |
|
|
|
500,200 |
|
|
$ |
85,734,296 |
|
3/7/04-4/3/04
|
|
|
305,900 |
|
|
|
28.05 |
|
|
|
305,900 |
|
|
$ |
77,153,801 |
|
4/4/04-5/8/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
77,153,801 |
|
5/9/04-6/5/04
|
|
|
866,500 |
|
|
|
27.45 |
|
|
|
866,500 |
|
|
$ |
53,368,376 |
|
6/6/04-7/3/04
|
|
|
837,500 |
|
|
|
29.84 |
|
|
|
837,500 |
|
|
$ |
28,377,376 |
|
7/4/04-8/7/04
|
|
|
338,000 |
|
|
|
29.55 |
|
|
|
338,000 |
|
|
$ |
18,389,476 |
|
8/8/04-9/4/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
18,389,476 |
|
9/5/04-10/2/04
|
|
|
179,700 |
|
|
|
27.82 |
|
|
|
179,700 |
|
|
$ |
13,390,222 |
|
10/3/04-11/6/04
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
29.48 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,598,222 |
|
11/7/04-12/4/04
|
|
|
52,349 |
|
|
|
30.53 |
|
|
|
52,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/5/04-1/1/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,480,149 |
|
|
$ |
28.73 |
|
|
|
3,480,149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
All repurchases by us of our common stock during the fiscal year
ended January 1, 2005 were done pursuant to the repurchase
program that we publicly announced on February 18, 2004
(the Program). |
13
|
|
(2) |
Our Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to
$100,000,000 of our common stock pursuant to the Program. There
was no expiration date for the Program and it expired when we
reached the $100,000,000 threshold. |
On December 7, 2004, we announced that our Board of
Directors had authorized a new stock repurchase program for the
repurchase of up to an additional $100 million of our
common stock. Purchase activity under this program commenced on
February 22, 2005.
|
|
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
The selected historical consolidated financial and other data
that follows should be read in conjunction with the
Consolidated Financial Statements, the accompanying
notes thereto and Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The historical
financial data as of January 1, 2005 and
January 3, 2004 and for the fifty-two weeks ended
January 1, 2005, the fifty-three weeks ended
January 3, 2004 and the fifty-two weeks ended
December 28, 2002 has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes
included in this document at Item 8.
The historical financial data as of December 28, 2002,
December 29, 2001, and December 20, 2000 and for the
fifty-two weeks ended January December 29, 2001 and
December 30, 2000 has been derived from audited financial
statements for the corresponding periods, which are not
contained in this document.
The selected historical financial data may not be indicative of
our future performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifty-Two | |
|
Fifty-Three | |
|
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended | |
|
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
| |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
December 29, | |
|
December 30, | |
Statement of Income Data: |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Sales
|
|
$ |
554,202 |
|
|
$ |
508,637 |
|
|
$ |
444,842 |
|
|
$ |
379,831 |
|
|
$ |
338,805 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
230,519 |
|
|
|
215,316 |
|
|
|
194,748 |
|
|
|
174,107 |
|
|
|
153,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
323,683 |
|
|
|
293,321 |
|
|
|
250,094 |
|
|
|
205,724 |
|
|
|
185,138 |
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
131,333 |
|
|
|
115,777 |
|
|
|
96,714 |
|
|
|
77,348 |
|
|
|
64,464 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
53,023 |
|
|
|
50,561 |
|
|
|
43,549 |
|
|
|
38,515 |
|
|
|
31,576 |
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
139,327 |
|
|
|
126,983 |
|
|
|
109,831 |
|
|
|
81,861 |
|
|
|
89,098 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(235 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
3,826 |
|
|
|
4,858 |
|
|
|
10,596 |
|
|
|
16,900 |
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
136,676 |
|
|
|
123,613 |
|
|
|
105,416 |
|
|
|
70,959 |
|
|
|
72,598 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
53,987 |
|
|
|
48,827 |
|
|
|
41,437 |
|
|
|
27,674 |
|
|
|
29,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
82,689 |
|
|
$ |
74,786 |
|
|
$ |
63,979 |
|
|
$ |
43,285 |
|
|
$ |
43,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.81 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
48,749 |
|
|
|
53,024 |
|
|
|
53,896 |
|
|
|
53,537 |
|
|
|
52,900 |
|
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
49,136 |
|
|
|
53,419 |
|
|
|
54,686 |
|
|
|
54,643 |
|
|
|
54,663 |
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifty-Two | |
|
Fifty-Three | |
|
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended | |
|
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
| |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
December 29, | |
|
December 30, | |
Statement of Income Data: |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Balance Sheet Data (as of end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
36,424 |
|
|
$ |
40,730 |
|
|
$ |
43,689 |
|
|
$ |
30,531 |
|
|
$ |
13,297 |
|
Working capital
|
|
|
44,107 |
|
|
|
(22,165 |
) |
|
|
17,182 |
|
|
|
(1,307 |
) |
|
|
(1,048 |
) |
Total assets
|
|
|
346,359 |
|
|
|
334,681 |
|
|
|
340,643 |
|
|
|
321,284 |
|
|
|
311,828 |
|
Total debt
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
60,600 |
|
|
|
115,000 |
|
|
|
157,512 |
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
179,663 |
|
|
|
190,273 |
|
|
|
212,912 |
|
|
|
148,104 |
|
|
|
105,167 |
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of retail stores (at end of period)
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Comparable store sales
|
|
|
(1.8 |
)% |
|
|
(4.2 |
)% |
|
|
(6.3 |
)% |
|
|
(1.7 |
)% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
Comparable store sales with catalog and Internet
|
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
|
(3.8 |
)% |
|
|
(4.4 |
)% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
Gross profit margin
|
|
|
58.4 |
% |
|
|
57.7 |
% |
|
|
56.2 |
% |
|
|
54.2 |
% |
|
|
54.6 |
% |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
$ |
21,850 |
|
|
$ |
19,440 |
|
|
$ |
17,347 |
|
|
$ |
14,347 |
|
|
$ |
10,762 |
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
28,908 |
|
|
|
22,023 |
|
|
|
25,867 |
|
|
|
26,844 |
|
|
|
37,122 |
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows from operating activities
|
|
$ |
121,324 |
|
|
$ |
113,446 |
|
|
$ |
91,815 |
|
|
$ |
86,962 |
|
|
$ |
57,310 |
|
Net cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
(40,199 |
) |
|
|
(22,050 |
) |
|
|
(24,153 |
) |
|
|
(26,428 |
) |
|
|
(37,457 |
) |
Net cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
(84,692 |
) |
|
|
(93,898 |
) |
|
|
(54,565 |
) |
|
|
(43,256 |
) |
|
|
(30,042 |
) |
EBITDA(1)
|
|
|
161,584 |
|
|
|
145,812 |
|
|
|
126,918 |
|
|
|
95,286 |
|
|
|
99,465 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA(2)
|
|
|
161,584 |
|
|
|
145,812 |
|
|
|
126,918 |
|
|
|
103,286 |
|
|
|
99,465 |
|
Adjusted EBITDA margin(3)
|
|
|
29.2 |
% |
|
|
28.7 |
% |
|
|
28.5 |
% |
|
|
27.1 |
% |
|
|
29.3 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
EBITDA represents earnings before extraordinary items, income
taxes, interest, depreciation and amortization (which includes
amortization of deferred financing costs) and amortization of
non-cash compensation, pursuant to Accounting Principles Board
Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. Amortization of deferred financing costs is
included in interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of
Income and in depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows. EBITDA is presented because management
believes it is a widely accepted financial indicator used by
certain investors and analysts to analyze and compare companies
on the basis of operating performance. EBITDA as presented may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other
companies since not all companies calculate EBITDA in an
identical manner and therefore is not necessarily an accurate
means of comparison between companies. EBITDA is not intended to
represent cash flows for the period or funds available for
managements discretionary use nor has it been represented
as an alternative to operating income as an indicator of
operating performance and should not be considered in isolation
or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. For |
15
|
|
|
each of the years shown above, EBITDA is calculated based upon
our net income (as shown above) and adjusted as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifty-Two | |
|
Fifty-Three | |
|
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended | |
|
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
| |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
December 29, | |
|
December 30, | |
EBITDA: |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net income
|
|
$ |
82,689 |
|
|
$ |
74,786 |
|
|
$ |
63,979 |
|
|
$ |
43,285 |
|
|
$ |
43,559 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
53,987 |
|
|
|
48,827 |
|
|
|
41,437 |
|
|
|
27,674 |
|
|
|
29,039 |
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
4,139 |
|
|
|
3,795 |
|
|
|
4,835 |
|
|
|
10,524 |
|
|
|
16,665 |
|
Depreciation & amortization
|
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
|
19,440 |
|
|
|
17,347 |
|
|
|
14,347 |
|
|
|
10,762 |
|
Non-cash compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs
|
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
(1,124 |
) |
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
(1,114 |
) |
|
|
(1,164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
161,584 |
|
|
$ |
145,812 |
|
|
$ |
126,918 |
|
|
$ |
95,286 |
|
|
$ |
99,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
Adjusted EBITDA represents EBITDA adjusted to eliminate the
$8.0 million restructuring charge in 2001. For each of the
years shown above, Adjusted EBITDA is calculated based upon
EBITDA (as shown above) and adjusted as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifty-Two | |
|
Fifty-Three | |
|
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended | |
|
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
| |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
December 29, | |
|
December 30, | |
Adjusted EBITDA: |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
161,584 |
|
|
$ |
145,812 |
|
|
$ |
126,918 |
|
|
$ |
95,286 |
|
|
$ |
99,465 |
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$ |
161,584 |
|
|
$ |
145,812 |
|
|
$ |
126,918 |
|
|
$ |
103,286 |
|
|
$ |
99,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
Adjusted EBITDA margin is Adjusted EBITDA as a percentage of
sales. |
|
|
Item 7. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations discusses our
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires management to make estimates and judgments
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis,
management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including
those related to inventories, restructuring costs, bad debts,
intangible assets, income taxes, debt service and contingencies
and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on
historical experience and on various other factors that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results
of which form the basis for making judgments about operating
results and the carrying values of assets and liabilities that
are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions. Management believes the following critical
accounting policies, among others, involve its more significant
estimates and judgments and are therefore particularly important
to an understanding of our results of operations and financial
position.
16
We sell our products both directly to retail customers and
through wholesale channels. Sales from the sale of merchandise
to retail customers are recognized at the time of sale, while
sales from wholesale customers are recognized when risk of loss
has passed to the customers. We believe that this is the time
that persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, delivery has
occurred, the price is fixed and determinable and collectability
is reasonably assured. Sales are recognized net of any
applicable discounts and allowances. Customers, be they retail
or wholesale, do have the right to return product to us in
certain limited situations. Such rights of return have not
precluded sales recognition because we have a long history with
such returns, which we use in constructing a reserve. This
reserve, however, is subject to change. In addition to returns,
we bear credit risk relative to our wholesale customers. We have
provided a reserve for bad debts in our financial statements
based on our estimates of the creditworthiness of our customers.
However, this reserve is also subject to change. Changes in
these reserves could affect our operating results.
We write down our inventory for estimated obsolescence or
unmarketable inventory in an amount equal to the difference
between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value,
based upon assumptions about future demand and market
conditions. If actual future demand or market conditions are
less favorable than those projected by management, additional
inventory write-downs may be required. In addition, our
inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market on a last-in
first-out (LIFO) basis. Fluctuations in inventory
levels along with the cost of raw materials could impact the
carrying value of our inventory. Changes in the carrying value
of inventory could affect our operating results.
We have a significant net deferred tax asset recorded on our
financial statements. This asset arose at the time of our
recapitalization in 1998 and is a future tax deduction for us.
The recoverability of this future tax deduction is dependent
upon our future profitability. We have made an assessment that
this asset is likely to be recovered and is appropriately
reflected on the balance sheet. Should we find that we are not
able to utilize this deduction in the future we would have to
record a reserve for all or a part of this asset, which would
adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.
|
|
|
Value of Long-Lived Assets, Including Intangibles |
Long-lived assets on our balance sheet consist primarily of
property, plant and equipment, customer list, tradename,
goodwill and trademarks. We periodically review the carrying
value of all of these assets based, in part, upon our
projections of anticipated undiscounted future cash flows. We
undertake this review when facts and circumstances suggest that
cash flows emanating from those assets may be diminished and at
least annually in the case of tradename and goodwill. Any
impairment charge that we record reduces our earnings. While we
believe that our future estimates are reasonable, different
assumptions regarding items such as future cash flows and the
volatility inherent in markets which we serve could affect our
evaluations and result in impairment charges against the
carrying value of those assets.
Effective in 2003, we adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock
Based Compensation. Under the prospective transition
method selected by us, as described in SFAS No. 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and
Disclosure, an amendment of SFAS No. 123, all
stock option grants beginning with grants made in fiscal 2003
are being expensed over the vesting period, based on the fair
value at the date of the grant. Fair value is determined based
on a variety of factors, all of which are estimates subject to
judgment. Changes in estimated lives of options, risk free
interest rates or exercise patterns could impact our results of
operations. We recorded a charge of
17
approximately $1.6 million and $0.6 million for the
fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005 and fifty-three weeks
ended January 3, 2004, respectively. In the third quarter
of fiscal 2005 in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R),
Share-Based Payment, we will be required to record
the fair value of stock options for all unvested options granted
prior to 2003. This will result in additional stock compensation
expense of approximately $0.3 million during the second
half of fiscal 2005.
Performance Measures
We measure the performance of our retail and wholesale segments
through a segment margin calculation, which specifically
identifies not only gross profit on the sales of products
through the two channels but also costs and expenses
specifically related to each segment.
Fluctuations in Quarterly Operating Results
We have experienced, and may experience in the future,
fluctuations in our quarterly operating results. There are
numerous factors that can contribute to these fluctuations;
however, the principal factors are seasonality and new store
openings.
Seasonality. We have historically realized higher
revenues and operating income in our fourth quarter,
particularly in our retail business. We believe that this has
been due primarily to the increase in the number of our retail
stores and to increased sales in the giftware industry during
the holiday season of the fourth quarter.
New Store Openings. The timing of our new store openings
may also have an impact on our quarterly results. First, we
incur certain one-time expenses related to opening each new
store. These expenses, which consist primarily of salaries,
occupancy costs, supplies and marketing costs, are expensed as
incurred. Second, most store expenses vary proportionately with
sales, but there is a fixed cost component. This typically
results in lower store profitability when a new store opens
because new stores generally have lower sales than mature
stores. Due to both of these factors, during periods when new
store openings as a percentage of the base are higher, operating
profit may decline in dollars and/or as a percentage of sales.
As the overall store base matures, the fixed cost component of
selling expenses is spread over an increased level of sales,
assuming sales increase as stores age, resulting in a decrease
in selling and other expenses as a percentage of sales.
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005 (2004)
Compared to Fifty-Three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004
(2003)
The fiscal year ended January 1, 2005 consisted of
52 weeks, the fiscal year ended January 3, 2004
consisted of 53 weeks and the fiscal year ended
December 28, 2002 consisted of 52 weeks.
Sales increased 9.0% to $554.2 million in 2004 from
$508.6 million in 2003. Wholesale sales, including
international operations, increased 11.9% to $270.7 million
in 2004 from $242.0 million for 2003. This growth was
achieved primarily by increasing the number of wholesale
locations and to a lesser extent by increasing sales to existing
locations.
Retail sales increased 6.3% to $283.5 million in 2004 from
$266.6 million for 2003. There were 345 retail stores open
as of January 1, 2005 compared to 286 stores open at
January 3, 2004. The increase in retail sales was achieved
primarily through the addition of 60 new stores in 2004 and to a
lesser extent increased sales in the 49 stores opened in 2003
(which in 2003 were open for less than a full year), partially
offset by a decrease in comparable store sales. Comparable store
and catalog and Internet sales in 2004 decreased 2% compared to
2003. Retail comparable store sales in 2004 decreased 2%
compared to 2003. The primary factor contributing to the
decrease in comparable store sales was a decline in our retail
store traffic. Comparable store sales represent a comparison of
the sales, during the corresponding fiscal
18
periods of the two fiscal years compared, of the stores included
in our comparable store sales base. A store first enters our
comparable store sales base in the fourteenth fiscal month of
operation. There were 285 stores included in the comparable
store base at the end of 2004, and 49 of these stores were
included for less than a full year.
Gross profit increased 10.4% to $323.7 million in 2004 from
$293.3 million in 2003. As a percentage of sales, gross
profit increased to 58.4% in 2004 from 57.7% in 2003. The
increase in gross profit dollars in 2004 compared to 2003 was
primarily attributable to the increase in sales. The improvement
in gross profit rate in 2004 compared to 2003 was primarily the
result of improved productivity improvements in supply chain
operations and the benefit of cost reduction initiatives.
Selling expenses increased 13.4% to $131.3 million in 2004
from $115.8 million in 2003. These expenses are related to
both wholesale and retail operations and consist of payroll,
occupancy, advertising and other operating costs, as well as
preopening costs, which are expensed as incurred. As a
percentage of sales, selling expenses were 23.7% in 2004 and
22.8% in 2003. The increase in selling expenses in dollars and
as a percentage of sales was primarily related to the 60 new
retail stores opened in 2004 and the 49 new retails stores
opened in 2003. These stores are considered immature stores,
which are generally stores that are less than three years old.
Immature stores typically generate higher selling expenses as a
percentage of sales than stores that have been open for more
than three years since fixed costs, as a percent of sales, are
higher in the early sales maturation period. The increase in
selling expenses as a percentage of sales is also explained by
the decrease in retail comparable sales in stores opened prior
to 2002 and to a decrease in catalog and Internet sales.
Segment profitability is sales less cost of sales and selling
expenses. Segment profitability for our wholesale operations,
including international operations, was $115.6 million or
42.7% of wholesale sales in 2004 compared to $101.6 million
or 42.0% of wholesale sales in 2003. Segment profitability for
our retail operations was $76.7 million or 27.1% of retail
sales in 2004 compared to $76.0 million or 28.5% of retail
sales in 2003. The increase in wholesale segment profitability
was primarily attributable to increased wholesale sales and
increased wholesale gross profit dollars and rate. The increase
in retail segment profitability in dollars was primarily
attributable to increased retail sales and increased gross
profit dollars and rate. The decrease in retail segment
profitability as a percentage of retail sales was primarily
attributable to decreased profitability in our catalog and
Internet operations and to a lesser extent decreased
profitability in our 90,000 square foot South Deerfield,
Massachusetts flagship store.
|
|
|
General and Administrative Expenses |
General and administrative expenses, which consist primarily of
personnel-related costs, increased 4.9% to $53.0 million in
2004 from $50.6 million in 2003. As a percentage of sales,
general and administrative expenses decreased to 9.6% from 9.9%.
The increase in general and administrative expense in dollars in
2004 compared to 2003 was primarily attributable to labor costs
associated with new hires made during 2004 and to an increase in
stock-based compensation expense in 2004 compared to 2003. The
decrease in general and administrative expense as a percentage
of sales for 2004 compared to 2003 was primarily due to the
Companys leveraging of these expenses over a larger sales
base.
Net other expense was $2.7 million in 2004 compared to
$3.4 million in 2003. The primary component of this expense
was interest expense, which was $4.2 million in 2004
compared to $3.8 million in 2003. The average daily debt
outstanding increased in 2004 compared to 2003 primarily due to
19
borrowings associated with repurchases of our common stock. The
impact of the higher average debt outstanding was offset in part
by a reduction in borrowing rates under our credit facility. In
2004, the Company also reduced certain non-income tax related
reserves that had been recorded in 2003 within other (income)
expense.
The income tax provision for 2004 was $54.0 million
compared to $48.8 million for 2003. The 2004 and 2003 tax
provisions resulted in an effective tax rate of 39.5%. We have
provided and expect to provide in 2005 a valuation allowance
against the deferred tax asset for our international operations.
As a result, it is anticipated that our effective tax rate for
2005 will be approximately 39.5%. We re-evaluate our effective
tax rate on a quarterly basis.
Fifty-Three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004
(2003) Compared to Fifty-Two Weeks Ended
December 28, 2002 (2002)
The fiscal year ended January 3, 2004 consisted of
53 weeks, while the fiscal years ended December 28,
2002 and December 29, 2001 consisted of 52 weeks.
Sales increased 14.3% to $508.6 million in 2003 from
$444.8 million in 2002. The additional 53rd week in
2003 contributed $5.2 million and $1.1 million in
retail and wholesale sales, respectively. Wholesale sales,
including international operations, increased 18.1% to
$242.0 million in 2003 from $204.9 million for 2002.
This growth was achieved primarily by increasing sales to
existing customers and to a lesser extent by increasing the
number of wholesale locations.
Retail sales increased 11.1% to $266.6 million in 2003 from
$239.9 million for 2002. There were 286 retail stores open
as of January 3, 2004 compared to 239 stores open at
December 28, 2002. The increase in retail sales was
achieved primarily through the addition of 49 new stores in 2003
and to a lesser extent increased sales in the 47 stores opened
in 2002 (which in 2002 were open for less than a full year),
partially offset by a decrease in comparable store sales.
Comparable store and catalog and Internet sales in 2003
decreased 4% compared to 2002. Retail comparable store sales in
2003 decreased 4% compared to 2002. We believe the primary
factor contributing to the decrease in comparable store sales
was a decline in store traffic, and mall traffic generally.
Comparable store sales were also negatively impacted in 2003 due
to the Presidents Day (February 16-17) snowstorm
which affected most of our store base in the Eastern half of the
United States and successive weekend snowstorms in early
December. Comparable store sales represent a comparison of the
sales, during the corresponding fiscal periods of the two fiscal
years compared, of the stores included in our comparable store
sales base. A store first enters our comparable store sales base
in the fourteenth fiscal month of operation. There were 237
stores included in the comparable store base at the end of 2003,
and 47 of these stores were included for less than a full year.
Gross profit increased 17.3% to $293.3 million in 2003 from
$250.1 million in 2002. As a percentage of sales, gross
profit increased to 57.7% in 2003 from 56.2% in 2002. The
increase in gross profit dollars in 2003 compared to 2002 was
primarily attributable to the increase in sales and more
efficient supply chain operations. The improvement in gross
profit rate in 2003 compared to 2002 was primarily due to
continued productivity improvements in supply chain operations
and more efficient sourcing of non-manufactured product.
20
Selling expenses increased 19.7% to $115.8 million in 2003
from $96.7 million in 2002. These expenses are related to
both wholesale and retail operations and consist of payroll,
occupancy, advertising and other operating costs, as well as
preopening costs, which are expensed as incurred. As a
percentage of sales, selling expenses were 22.8% in 2003 and
21.7% in 2002. The increase in selling expenses in dollars and
as a percentage of sales was primarily related to the continued
growth in the number of retail stores, from 239 as of
December 28, 2002 to 286 as of January 3, 2004, the
effect of which is an increase in the weighting of immature
stores. Immature stores are generally stores that are less than
four years old. Immature stores typically generate higher
selling expenses as a percentage of sales than stores that have
been open for more than four years since fixed costs, as a
percent of sales, are higher during the early sales maturation
period. The increase in selling expense as a percentage of sales
for 2003 is also explained by the decrease in retail comparable
store sales since the fixed components of labor and occupancy do
not decrease with negative comparable store sales. Selling
expenses were also unfavorably impacted by the $1.0 million
bad debt provision the Company recognized in the fourth quarter
of 2003 related to the failure of our former Canadian
distributor to pay to us amounts due and payable for product
shipped.
Segment profitability is sales less cost of sales and selling
expenses. Segment profitability for our wholesale operations,
including international operations, was $101.6 million or
42.0% of wholesale sales in 2003 compared to $87.2 million
or 42.6% of wholesale sales in 2002. Segment profitability for
our retail operations was $76.0 million or 28.5% of retail
sales in 2003 compared to $66.2 million or 27.6% of retail
sales in 2002. The increase in wholesale segment profitability
in dollars was primarily attributable to increased wholesale
sales. The decrease in wholesale segment profitability as a
percentage of wholesale sales was primarily due to a
$1.0 million bad debt provision the Company recognized in
the fourth quarter of 2003 related to the failure of our former
Canadian distributor to pay to us amounts due and payable for
product shipped. The increase in retail segment profitability in
dollars and as a percentage of retail sales was primarily
attributable to increased retail sales and improved supply chain
operations, offset in part by a decrease in retail comparable
store sales and the impact of our most immature stores, the 2003
and 2002 store classes.
|
|
|
General and Administrative Expenses |
General and administrative expenses, which consist primarily of
personnel-related costs, increased 16.1% to $50.6 million
in 2003 from $43.5 million in 2002. As a percentage of
sales, general and administrative expenses increased to 9.9%
from 9.8%. The increase in general and administrative expenses
was primarily attributable to headcount additions in the latter
part of 2002 and in 2003, consulting costs related to a
strategic planning project that began in late February 2003,
stock-based compensation expense, profit sharing expense and to
a lesser extent increased insurance costs associated with the
Companys Directors and Officers insurance policy.
In 2003, we adopted the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS No. 123. Under the prospective transition method
selected by us as described in SFAS No. 148, all stock
option grants beginning with grants made in fiscal 2003 are
being expensed over the vesting period, based on the fair value
at the date of the grant. This resulted in $0.6 million of
incremental stock compensation expense in 2003.
Net other expense was $3.4 million in 2003 compared to
$4.4 million in 2002. The primary component of this expense
was interest expense, which was $3.8 million in 2003
compared to $4.9 million in 2002. The decrease in interest
expense in 2003 compared to 2002 was primarily the result of the
reduction in the average daily debt outstanding.
21
The income tax provision for 2003 was $48.8 million
compared to $41.4 million for 2002. The 2003 and 2002 tax
provisions resulted in an effective tax rate of 39.5% and 39.3%,
respectively. We have provided a valuation allowance against the
deferred tax asset for our international operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have consistently generated positive cash flow from
operations. Specifically, over the last three fiscal years we
have generated a total cash flow from operations of
approximately $327 million, including approximately
$121 million in 2004. These amounts have exceeded net
income in all the fiscal years presented due primarily to two
factors. First, we have incurred non-cash charges for
depreciation and amortization. Second, income tax expense has
significantly exceeded taxes actually paid owing to the tax
deduction that we continue to utilize that arose from the 1998
recapitalization. This tax deduction is expected to continue to
provide an annual cash benefit for the next nine years. On an
annual basis, this results in tax savings of approximately
$11.7 million per year through 2013 assuming sufficient
income to realize the full benefit of this deduction.
These internally generated cash flows have been sufficient to
fund necessary capital expenditures for our expansion plans. On
June 7, 2004, we acquired substantially all of the assets
of GBI Marketing, Inc., a privately owned and operated
distributor of selected gift products, including Yankee
Candle® products, to fundraising organizations. The total
cash purchase price was approximately $11.6 million.
Capital expenditures in 2004 were $28.9 million and were
primarily related to the capital requirements to open 60 new
stores and investments in manufacturing and logistics
operations. Capital expenditures were approximately
$22.0 million in 2003 and primarily related to similar
expenditures. We anticipate that capital expenditures in 2005
will total approximately $38.1 million, including
approximately $13.2 million to open a new
65,000 square foot flagship store in Williamsburg,
Virginia. The remaining $24.9 million is expected to be
spent in a similar manner as in 2004. We plan to open
approximately 46 new stores in 2005, including the Williamsburg,
Virginia flagship store.
On May 19, 2004, we entered into a new $200 million
senior unsecured revolving credit facility (the Credit
Facility) with Citizens Bank of Massachusetts and a
syndicate of lenders. This Credit Facility has two Tranches, a
$150 million Tranche (Tranche A) that
expires on May 19, 2007 and a $50 million Tranche
(Tranche B) that expires on May 18, 2005.
The Credit Facility replaced the $150 million revolving
credit facility that was scheduled to expire on July 7,
2004. This Credit Facility is being used for, among other
things, working capital, letters of credit, repurchase of the
our common stock and other general corporate purposes.
Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility bear interest at a
rate equal to, at the Companys option, the Citizens Bank
Base Rate, or Eurodollar Rate. Eurodollar borrowings under
Tranche A of the Credit Facility include a margin rate
ranging from 0.70% to 1.00% and borrowings under Tranche B
include a margin rate ranging from 0.75% to 1.05%. These rates
vary depending on the Companys outstanding borrowings. In
addition, the Company is required to pay the lenders a quarterly
commitment fee on the unused revolving loan commitment amount.
The commitment fee under Tranche A ranges from 0.15% to
0.25% and under Tranche B ranges from 0.10% to 0.20%. Fees
for outstanding commercial and standby letters of credit range
from 0.70% to 1.00%. The Company is also required to pay a
utilization fee on the total Credit Facility of 0.125% once
outstanding borrowings exceed $100 million. The Credit
Facility requires that the Company comply with several financial
and other covenants, including requirements that the Company
maintain at the end of each fiscal quarter the following
financial ratios as set forth in the Credit Facility:
|
|
|
|
|
a consolidated total debt to consolidated EBITDA ratio of no
more than 2.00 to 1.00 at January 1, 2005 and for
subsequent fiscal quarters (at January 1, 2005 this ratio
was 0.47 to 1.00). |
|
|
|
a fixed charge coverage ratio (the ratio of the sum of
consolidated EBITDA plus rent expense, less cash taxes paid and
capital expenditures to the sum of consolidated cash interest
expense plus rent |
22
|
|
|
|
|
expense and dividends) of no less than 1.75 to 1.00 for fiscal
2004; no less than 2.00 to 1.00 for fiscal 2005; and no less
than 2.25 to 1.00 during fiscal 2006 and thereafter (at
January 1, 2005 this ratio was 4.59 to 1.00). |
Our Credit Facility defines EBITDA as our consolidated net
income, plus the amount of net interest expense, depreciation
and amortization, income taxes, and certain non-cash
compensation expenses.
The Credit Facility permits the payment of cash dividends by the
Company of up to 50% of the current fiscal years net
income and the repurchase of the Companys shares, so long
as the Companys Consolidated Net Worth (as defined in the
Credit Facility) is not less than the required amount stated
therein. In order to declare or pay dividends in fiscal 2005,
our Consolidated Net Worth must not be less than the sum of
$100 million, plus 25% of our fiscal 2004 net income,
plus 25% of net income for each fiscal quarter thereafter. Our
net income for fiscal 2004 was $82.7 million, and 25% of
2004 net income was therefore approximately
$20.7 million. As of January 1, 2005, the
Companys net worth was approximately $179.7 million,
in excess of the $120.7 million required under our Credit
Facility for the declaration or payment of dividends. We
anticipate that the Companys net worth as of June 1,
2005, the date on which the first semi-annual payment is
scheduled to be made, will likewise exceed the required amount
under our Credit Facility. While it is our current intention to
pay annual cash dividends in years following 2005, any decision
to pay future cash dividends will be made by our Board of
Directors and will depend upon our earnings, financial condition
and other factors.
As of January 1, 2005, $75 million was outstanding
under the revolving credit facility and $1.0 million was
outstanding for letters of credit, leaving $124 million in
availability. As of January 1, 2005, we were in compliance
with all covenants under the Credit Facility.
In addition to obligations to repay our debt obligations, we
lease the majority of our retail stores under long-term
operating leases. The following table summarizes our commitments
under both our debt and lease obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period (In Thousands) | |
|
|
| |
Contractual Obligations |
|
Total | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Debt obligations(1)
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
179,632 |
|
|
|
25,603 |
|
|
|
24,451 |
|
|
|
23,311 |
|
|
|
22,665 |
|
|
|
21,020 |
|
|
|
62,582 |
|
Purchase commitments(2)
|
|
|
11,453 |
|
|
|
11,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations
|
|
$ |
266,085 |
|
|
$ |
37,056 |
|
|
$ |
24,451 |
|
|
$ |
98,311 |
|
|
$ |
22,665 |
|
|
$ |
21,020 |
|
|
$ |
62,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes contractual interest payments due to the fluctuating
debt balance and interest rate expected in the future. |
|
(2) |
Includes open purchase orders for goods purchased in the
ordinary course of our business, whether or not we are able to
cancel such purchase orders. |
On February 12, 2004 we announced that our Board of
Directors had approved a stock repurchase program authorizing us
to repurchase up to $100 million of Yankee Candle common
stock. During fiscal 2004, we repurchased a total of
3,480,419 shares of common stock for an aggregate purchase
price of approximately $100 million. Our repurchase
activities were funded from cash flow from operations and
borrowings under our existing Credit Facility. On
December 7, 2004, we announced that our Board of Directors
had authorized a new stock repurchase program for the repurchase
of up to an additional $100 million of our common stock.
Purchase activity under this program commenced on
February 22, 2005.
We expect that the principal sources of funding for our planned
store openings and other working capital needs, capital
expenditures, debt service obligations and stock repurchase
program will be a combination of our available cash and cash
equivalents, cash generated from operations, and borrowings
under our Credit Facility. We believe that our current cash and
cash equivalents and sources of cash will
23
be sufficient to fund our liquidity needs for at least the next
12 months. However, there are a number of factors that may
negatively impact our available sources of cash. The amount of
cash generated from operations will be dependent upon factors
such as the successful execution of our business plan and
worldwide economic conditions. In addition, borrowings under our
Credit Facility are dependent upon our continued compliance with
the financial and other covenants contained therein.
Accounting Change in 2003
We sponsor certain stock option plans. Prior to the third
quarter of 2003, we accounted for employee options or share
awards under the intrinsic-value method prescribed by APB
Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. Compensation expense, if any, was recognized
based on the difference between the fair value of the common
stock and the exercise price of the option on the measurement
date, as defined by APB Opinion No. 25. Pro forma
disclosures of net earnings and earnings per share had been
provided supplementally, as if the fair value method of
accounting defined in SFAS No. 123 Accounting
for Stock Based Compensation had been applied. Effective
September 27, 2003, we adopted the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123 using the prospective
transition method provided by SFAS No. 148
Accounting for Stock Based Compensation
Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of
SFAS No. 123. Under the prospective transition
method, we have valued all stock option grants beginning with
grants made in fiscal 2003. These are being expensed over the
vesting period based on the fair value at the date of the grant.
The adoption of the fair value method of accounting for
stock-based compensation resulted in a charge of
$1.6 million and $0.6 million for the fiscal years
ended January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004,
respectively.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 151 Inventory Costs,
an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4
(SFAS 151). The standard clarifies the accounting for
abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted material. SFAS No. 151 is effective
for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2005. We do not believe adoption of
SFAS No. 151 will have a material effect on our
financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R).
This statement revises FASB Statement No. 123 and
supersedes APB Opinion No. 25. SFAS No. 123(R)
focuses primarily on the accounting for transactions in which an
entity obtains employee services in share-based payment
transactions. SFAS No. 123(R)requires that the fair
value of such equity instruments be recognized as an expense in
the historical financial statements as services are performed.
The provisions of this Statement are effective for the first
interim reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005.
Under the prospective transition method, we have valued all
stock option grants beginning with grants made in fiscal 2003.
These are being expensed over the vesting period based on the
fair value at the date of the grant. Accordingly, we will adopt
SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective method
commencing with the quarter ending October 1, 2005 for all
stock option grants awarded prior to 2003. We estimate that the
adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will result in future
additional compensation charges of approximately
$0.3 million during fiscal 2005 and there will be no impact
to cash flow from operations. The pro forma table in Note 2
of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if
we had applied the fair value recognition provisions of
SFAS 123 to stock option grants awarded prior to 2003.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109
(SFAS 109), Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax
Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (FSP 109-1). FSP 109-1
clarifies that the manufacturers deduction provided for
under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA) should
be accounted for as a special deduction in accordance with
SFAS 109 and not as a tax rate reduction. We have not
completed the process of evaluating the impact that will result
from adopting this statement and are therefore unable to
disclose the impact that adopting FSP 109-1 will have on our
financial position and results of operations.
24
The FASB also issued FASB Staff Position No. 109-2,
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings
Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004 (FSP 109-2). The AJCA introduces a special one-time
dividends received deduction on the repatriation of certain
foreign earnings to a U.S. taxpayer (repatriation
provision), provided certain criteria are met. FSP 109-2
provides accounting and disclosure guidance for the repatriation
provision. We do not believe adoption of FSP 109-2 will have a
material effect on our financial statements.
Impact of Inflation
We do not believe inflation has a significant impact on our
operations. The prices of our products have not varied based on
the movement of the consumer price index. The majority of our
material and labor costs have not been materially affected by
inflation.
Future Operating Results
As referenced above, there are a number of factors that might
cause our actual results to differ significantly from the
results reflected by the forward-looking statements contained
herein. In addition to factors generally affecting the
political, economic and competitive conditions in the United
States and abroad, such factors include those set forth below.
|
|
|
If we fail to grow our business as planned, our future
operating results may suffer. As we grow, it will be difficult
to maintain our historical growth rates. |
We intend to continue to pursue a business strategy of
increasing sales and earnings by expanding our retail and
wholesale operations both in the United States and
internationally. Because our ability to implement our growth
strategy successfully will be dependent in part on factors
beyond our control, including consumer preferences,
macro-economic conditions, the competitive environment in the
markets in which we compete and other factors, we may not be
able to achieve our planned growth or sustain our financial
performance. Our ability to anticipate changes in the candle,
home fragrance and giftware industries, and identify industry
trends, will be critical factors in our ability to grow as
planned and remain competitive.
We expect that, as we continue to grow, it will become more
difficult to maintain our historical growth rate, which could
negatively impact our operating margins and results of
operations. New stores typically generate lower operating margin
contributions than mature stores because fixed costs, as a
percentage of sales, are higher and because pre-opening costs
are fully expensed in the year of opening. In addition, our
retail sales generate lower margins than our wholesale sales.
Our wholesale business has grown by increasing sales to existing
customers and by adding new customers. If we are not able to
continue this, our sales growth and profitability could be
adversely affected. In addition, as we expand our wholesale
business into new channels of trade that we believe to be
appropriate, sales in some of these new channels may, for
competitive reasons within the channels, generate lower margins
than do our existing wholesale sales. Similarly, as we continue
to broaden our product offerings in order to meet consumer
demand, we may do so in part by adding products that, while
still very profitable, have lower product margins than those of
our extremely profitable core candle products. We cannot assure
you that we will continue to grow at a rate comparable to our
historic growth rate or that our historic financial performance
will continue as we grow.
|
|
|
We may be unable to continue to open new stores
successfully. |
Our retail growth strategy depends in large part on our ability
to successfully open new stores in both existing and new
geographic markets. For our growth strategy to be successful, we
must identify and lease favorable store sites on favorable
economic terms, hire and train managers and associates and adapt
management and operational systems to meet the needs of our
expanded operations. These tasks may be difficult to accomplish
successfully. If we are unable to open new stores as quickly as
planned, then our future sales and profits could be materially
adversely affected. Even if we succeed in opening new stores,
25
these new stores may not achieve the same sales or profit levels
as our existing stores. Also, our retail growth strategy
includes opening new stores in markets where we already have a
presence so we can take advantage of economies of scale in
marketing, distribution and supervision costs, or the opening of
new malls or centers n the market. However, these new stores may
result in the loss of sales in existing stores in nearby areas,
thereby negatively impacting our comparable store sales. Our
retail growth strategy also depends upon our ability to
successfully renew the expiring leases of our profitable
existing stores. If we are unable to do so at planned levels and
upon favorable economic terms, then our future sales and profits
could be negatively affected.
|
|
|
We face significant competition in the giftware industry.
This competition could cause our revenues or margins to fall
short of expectations which could adversely affect our future
operating results, financial condition and liquidity and our
ability to continue to grow our business. |
We compete generally for the disposable income of consumers with
other producers and retailers in the giftware industry. The
giftware industry is highly competitive with a large number of
both large and small participants and relatively low barriers to
entry. Our products compete with other scented and unscented
candle, home fragrance and personal care products and with other
gifts within a comparable price range, like boxes of candy,
flowers, wine, fine soap and related merchandise. Our retail
stores compete primarily with specialty candle retailers and a
variety of other retailers including department stores, gift
stores and national specialty retailers that carry candles along
with personal care items, giftware and houseware. In addition,
while we focus primarily on the premium scented candle segment,
scented and unscented candles are also sold outside of that
segment by a variety of retailers including mass merchandisers.
In our wholesale business, we compete with numerous
manufacturers and importers of candles, home fragrance products
and other home décor and gift items for the limited space
available in our wholesale customer locations for the display
and sale of such products to consumers. Some of our competitors
are part of large, diversified companies which have greater
financial resources and a wider range of product offerings than
we do. Many of our competitors source their products from low
cost manufacturers outside of the United States. This
competitive environment could adversely affect our future
revenues and profits, financial condition and liquidity and our
ability to continue to grow our business.
|
|
|
A material decline in consumers discretionary income
could cause our sales and income to decline. |
Our results depend on consumer spending, which is influenced by
general economic conditions and the availability of
discretionary income. Accordingly, we may experience declines in
sales during economic downturns or during periods of uncertainty
like that which followed the September 11, 2001 terrorist
attacks on the United States or which result from the threat of
war or the possibility of further terrorist attacks. Any
material decline in the amount of discretionary spending could
have a material adverse effect on our sales and income.
|
|
|
Because we are not a diversified company and are
effectively dependent upon one industry, we have less
flexibility in reacting to unfavorable consumer trends, adverse
economic conditions or business cycles. |
We rely primarily on the sale of premium scented candles and
related products in the giftware industry. In the event that
sales of these products decline or do not meet our expectations,
we cannot rely on the sales of other products to offset such a
shortfall. As a significant portion of our expenses is comprised
of fixed costs, such as lease payments, our ability to decrease
expenses in response to adverse business conditions is limited
in the short term. As a result, unfavorable consumer trends,
adverse economic conditions or changes in the business cycle
could have a material and adverse impact on our earnings.
|
|
|
If we lose our senior executive officers, or are unable to
attract and retain the talent required for our business, our
business could be disrupted and our financial performance could
suffer. |
Our success is substantially dependent upon the retention of our
senior executive officers. If one or more of our senior
executive officers become unable or unwilling to participate in
our business, our future business and financial performance
could be materially affected. In addition, as our business grows
in size
26
and complexity we must be able to continue to attract, develop
and retain qualified personnel sufficient to allow us to
adequately manage and grow our business. If we are unable to do
so, our operating results could be negatively impacted. We
cannot guarantee that we will be able to attract and retain
personnel as and when necessary in the future.
|
|
|
Many aspects of our manufacturing and distribution
facilities are customized for our business; as a result, the
loss of one of these facilities would disrupt our
operations. |
Approximately 74% of our sales in 2004 were generated by
products we manufacture at our manufacturing facility in
Whately, Massachusetts and we rely primarily on our distribution
facilities in South Deerfield, Massachusetts to distribute our
products. Because most of our machinery is designed or
customized by us to manufacture our products, and because we
have strict quality control standards for our products, the loss
of our manufacturing facility, due to natural disaster or
otherwise, would materially affect our operations. Similarly,
our distribution facilities rely upon customized machinery,
systems and operations, the loss of which would materially
affect our operations. Although our manufacturing and
distribution facilities are adequately insured, we believe it
would take up to twelve months to resume operations at a level
equivalent to current operations.
|
|
|
Seasonal, quarterly and other fluctuations in our
business, and general industry and market conditions, could
affect the market for our common stock. |
Our sales and operating results vary from quarter to quarter. We
have historically realized higher sales and operating income in
our fourth quarter, particularly in our retail business, which
accounts for a larger portion of our sales. We believe that this
has been due primarily to an increase in giftware industry sales
during the holiday season of the fourth quarter. As a result of
this seasonality, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons
of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful and that
these comparisons cannot be relied upon as indicators of future
performance. In addition, we may also experience quarterly
fluctuations in our sales and income depending on various
factors, including, among other things, the number of new retail
stores we open in a particular quarter, changes in the ordering
patterns of our wholesale customers during a particular quarter,
pricing and promotional activities of our competitors, and the
mix of products sold. Most of our operating expenses, such as
rent expense, advertising and promotional expense and employee
wages and salaries, do not vary directly with sales and are
difficult to adjust in the short term. As a result, if sales for
a particular quarter are below our expectations, we might not be
able to proportionately reduce operating expenses for that
quarter, and therefore a sales shortfall could have a
disproportionate effect on our operating results for that
quarter. Further, our comparable store sales from our retail
business in a particular quarter could be adversely affected by
competition, the opening nearby of new retail stores or
wholesale locations, economic or other general conditions or our
inability to execute a particular business strategy. As a result
of these factors, we may report in the future sales, operating
results or comparable store sales that do not match the
expectations of market analysts and investors. This could cause
the trading price of our common stock to decline. In addition,
broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the
price of our common stock, regardless of our operating
performance.
|
|
|
Public health epidemics such as Severe Acute Respiratory
Syndrome may affect our operating results. |
Approximately 11% of our sales in 2004 were generated by
products, primarily accessories, that we purchased overseas.
Substantially all of these products were purchased from East
Asia. A sustained interruption of the operations of our
suppliers, as a result of the impact of Severe Acute Respiratory
Syndrome or other similar health epidemics, natural disasters
such as the 2004 tsunami, or other factors could have an adverse
effect on our ability to receive timely shipments of certain of
our products.
27
|
|
|
Provisions in our corporate documents and Massachusetts
law could delay or prevent a change in control of Yankee
Candle. |
Our Articles of Organization and By-Laws may discourage, delay
or prevent a merger or acquisition involving Yankee Candle that
our stockholders may consider favorable, by:
|
|
|
|
|
authorizing the issuance of preferred stock, the terms of which
may be determined at the sole discretion of the board of
directors, |
|
|
|
providing for a classified board of directors, with staggered
three-year terms, and |
|
|
|
establishing advance notice requirements for nominations for
election to the board of directors or for proposing matters that
can be acted on by stockholders at meetings. |
Massachusetts law may also discourage, delay or prevent someone
from acquiring or merging with us.
|
|
|
We are subject to a class action lawsuit in
California. |
A class action lawsuit has been filed against us for alleged
violations of certain California state wage and hour and
employment laws with respect to certain employees in our
California retail stores. This complaint was filed in February
2005 and we have therefore only begun to investigate the
allegations and have yet to file our answer. While we intend to
vigorously defend ourselves against the allegations, it is too
early in the litigation process for us to fully evaluate or
predict the outcome of the litigation.
|
|
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risks |
Our market risks relate primarily to changes in interest rates.
We bear this risk in two specific ways. First, we have debt
outstanding. At January 1, 2005, we had $75 million
outstanding under our Credit Facility, which bears interest at
variable rates. At January 1, 2005, the weighted-average
interest rate on outstanding borrowings was 2.8%. This facility
is intended to fund operating needs and stock repurchases if
necessary. Because this facility carries a variable interest
rate pegged to market indices, our results of operations and
cash flows will be exposed to changes in interest rates. Based
on January 1, 2005 borrowing levels, a 1.00% increase or
decrease in current market interest rates would have the effect
of causing an approximately $0.8 million additional annual
pre-tax charge or credit to the statements of income.
The second component of interest rate risk involves the
short-term investment of excess cash. This risk impacts fair
values, earnings and cash flows. Excess cash is primarily
invested in interest bearing accounts that fluctuate with market
interest rates. Based on January 1, 2005 cash equivalents,
a 1.00% increase or decrease in current market interest rates
would have the effect of causing an approximately
$0.4 million additional pre-tax credit or charge to the
annual statements of income.
We buy a variety of raw materials for inclusion in our products.
The only raw material that is considered to be of a commodity
nature is wax. Wax is a petroleum-based product. However, its
market price has not historically fluctuated with the movement
of oil prices and has instead generally moved with inflation. In
2004, however, significant increases in the price of crude oil
resulted in corresponding increases in the price of
petroleum-based wax. These crude oil price increases also
negatively impacted our transportation costs. Future significant
increases in wax prices could have an adverse affect on our cost
of goods sold and could lower our margins.
At this point in time, operations outside of the United States
are immaterial. Accordingly, we are not exposed to substantial
risks arising from foreign currency exchange rates.
28
|
|
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON
THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Board of Directors and Stockholders
The Yankee Candle Company, Inc.
South Deerfield, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) as of January 1, 2005 and
January 3, 2004, and the related consolidated statements of
income, stockholders equity and cash flows for the
fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005, the fifty-three
weeks ended January 3, 2004 and the fifty-two weeks ended
December 28, 2002. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The
Yankee Candle Company, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity and
cash flows for the fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005,
the fifty-three weeks ended January 3, 2004 and the
fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2002 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
As described in Note 2 to the financial statements, the
Company changed its method of accounting for stock-based
compensation to conform to the provisions of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation and No. 148 Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure
during the year ended January 3, 2004.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of January 1, 2005, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 4, 2005
expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment
of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting and an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 4, 2005
29
THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
36,424 |
|
|
$ |
40,730 |
|
Accounts receivable less allowance of $765 at January 1,
2005 and $1,332 at January 3, 2004
|
|
|
28,231 |
|
|
|
24,251 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
46,901 |
|
|
|
42,186 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
8,112 |
|
|
|
6,608 |
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
|
3,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
123,544 |
|
|
|
116,903 |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT NET
|
|
|
126,365 |
|
|
|
114,774 |
|
MARKETABLE SECURITIES
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
1,604 |
|
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
|
|
|
84,697 |
|
|
|
100,346 |
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
3,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$ |
346,359 |
|
|
$ |
334,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
20,246 |
|
|
$ |
23,527 |
|
Accrued payroll
|
|
|
14,492 |
|
|
|
13,348 |
|
Accrued income taxes
|
|
|
26,264 |
|
|
|
22,025 |
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
18,435 |
|
|
|
15,168 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
79,437 |
|
|
|
139,068 |
|
DEFERRED COMPENSATION OBLIGATION
|
|
|
1,659 |
|
|
|
1,525 |
|
LONG-TERM DEBT Less current portion
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED RENT
|
|
|
10,600 |
|
|
|
3,815 |
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value; 300,000 shares
authorized; 47,309 and 104,397 issued at January 1, 2005
and January 3, 2004, respectively; 47,309 and
50,484 shares outstanding at January 1, 2005 and
January 3, 2004, respectively
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
105,737 |
|
|
|
227,145 |
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(313,880 |
) |
Retained earnings
|
|
|
73,447 |
|
|
|
275,790 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
179,663 |
|
|
|
190,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
$ |
346,359 |
|
|
$ |
334,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
30
THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifty-two | |
|
Fifty-three | |
|
Fifty-two | |
|
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
SALES
|
|
$ |
554,202 |
|
|
$ |
508,637 |
|
|
$ |
444,842 |
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
230,519 |
|
|
|
215,316 |
|
|
|
194,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
|
|
323,683 |
|
|
|
293,321 |
|
|
|
250,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
131,333 |
|
|
|
115,777 |
|
|
|
96,714 |
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
53,023 |
|
|
|
50,561 |
|
|
|
43,549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
184,356 |
|
|
|
166,338 |
|
|
|
140,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
|
|
|
139,327 |
|
|
|
126,983 |
|
|
|
109,831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
4,152 |
|
|
|
3,826 |
|
|
|
4,858 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
(1,488 |
) |
|
|
(425 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
3,370 |
|
|
|
4,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
136,676 |
|
|
|
123,613 |
|
|
|
105,416 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
53,987 |
|
|
|
48,827 |
|
|
|
41,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$ |
82,689 |
|
|
$ |
74,786 |
|
|
$ |
63,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE BASIC SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
48,749 |
|
|
|
53,024 |
|
|
|
53,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE DILUTED SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|
|
49,136 |
|
|
|
53,419 |
|
|
|
54,686 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
31
THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Paid in | |
|
Treasury | |
|
Retained | |
|
Stock | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Stock | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Loss | |
|
Income | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
BALANCE, DECEMBER 29, 2001
|
|
|
104,061 |
|
|
$ |
1,041 |
|
|
$ |
224,850 |
|
|
$ |
(213,752 |
) |
|
$ |
137,025 |
|
|
$ |
(522 |
) |
|
$ |
(538 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
148,104 |
|
Issuance of common stock and option exercises, including related
tax benefits
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
Costs of 2002 issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,342 |
) |
Amortization of unearned stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,979 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,979 |
|
|
|
63,979 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
64,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, DECEMBER 28, 2002
|
|
|
104,188 |
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
224,815 |
|
|
|
(213,883 |
) |
|
|
201,004 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,912 |
|
Issuance of common stock and option exercises, including related
tax benefits
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2,673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,675 |
|
Costs of 2003 issuance of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(976 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(976 |
) |
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
721 |
|
Payments for the redemption of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(99,997 |
) |
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,786 |
|
|
|
74,786 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, JANUARY 3, 2004
|
|
|
104,397 |
|
|
|
1,044 |
|
|
|
227,145 |
|
|
|
(313,880 |
) |
|
|
275,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,273 |
|
Issuance of common stock and option exercises, including related
tax benefits
|
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,308 |
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
Payments for the redemption of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
Retirement of treasury shares
|
|
|
(57,393 |
) |
|
|
(574 |
) |
|
|
(128,274 |
) |
|
|
413,880 |
|
|
|
(285,032 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,689 |
|
|
|
82,689 |
|
|
Foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
82,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE, JANUARY 1, 2005
|
|
|
47,309 |
|
|
$ |
473 |
|
|
$ |
105,737 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
73,447 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
179,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
32
THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifty-Two | |
|
Fifty-Three | |
|
Fifty-Two | |
|
|
Weeks ended | |
|
Weeks ended | |
|
Weeks ended | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
82,689 |
|
|
$ |
74,786 |
|
|
$ |
63,979 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
21,850 |
|
|
|
19,440 |
|
|
|
17,347 |
|
|
|
Unrealized (gain) loss on marketable securities
|
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
(365 |
) |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
14,901 |
|
|
|
12,105 |
|
|
|
14,995 |
|
|
|
Loss on disposal and impairments of property and equipment
|
|
|
977 |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
(3,703 |
) |
|
|
1,380 |
|
|
|
(2,029 |
) |
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
(3,107 |
) |
|
|
(7,359 |
) |
|
|
(10,564 |
) |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(2,200 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(1,956 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(3,308 |
) |
|
|
2,899 |
|
|
|
1,540 |
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
11,841 |
|
|
|
9,325 |
|
|
|
7,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
121,324 |
|
|
|
113,446 |
|
|
|
91,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS (USED IN) PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(28,908 |
) |
|
|
(22,023 |
) |
|
|
(25,867 |
) |
|
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
Investments in marketable securities
|
|
|
(446 |
) |
|
|
(286 |
) |
|
|
(391 |
) |
|
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
Cash paid for business acquisition
|
|
|
(11,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(40,199 |
) |
|
|
(22,050 |
) |
|
|
(24,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of common stock
|
|
|
(100,000 |
) |
|
|
(99,997 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds (costs) from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
5,308 |
|
|
|
1,699 |
|
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
Net borrowings (repayments) under bank credit agreements
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
4,400 |
|
|
|
(54,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
(84,692 |
) |
|
|
(93,898 |
) |
|
|
(54,565 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
|
61 |
|
NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(4,306 |
) |
|
|
(2,959 |
) |
|
|
13,158 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
|
|
40,730 |
|
|
|
43,689 |
|
|
|
30,531 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR
|
|
$ |
36,424 |
|
|
$ |
40,730 |
|
|
$ |
43,689 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
2,925 |
|
|
$ |
2,111 |
|
|
$ |
3,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$ |
33,666 |
|
|
$ |
31,532 |
|
|
$ |
22,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of equipment by assumption of capital lease
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
33
THE YANKEE CANDLE COMPANY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28, 2002
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (Yankee
Candle or the Company) is the leading
designer, manufacturer and branded marketer of premium scented
candles in the giftware industry. The Company has a 35-year
history of offering its distinctive products and marketing them
as affordable luxuries and consumable gifts. Yankee Candle
products are available in approximately 185 fragrances and
include a wide variety of jar candles, Samplers® votive
candles, Tarts® wax potpourri, pillars and other candle
products, the vast majority of which are marketed under the
Yankee Candle® brand. The Company also sells a wide range
of coordinated candle and home décor accessories and has
extended its brand into the growing premium home fragrance
market segment with products such as Housewarmer® electric
home fragrancers, Yankee Candle® branded potpourri,
sachets, room sprays and linen sprays, Yankee Candle Car
Jars® air fresheners and Yankee
Candletm
Bath personal care products. The Company sells its products
through several channels including wholesale customers who
operate approximately 15,600 stores in North America, 345
Company-owned and operated retail stores in 43 states as of
January 1, 2005, direct mail catalogs, its Internet web
site (www.yankeecandle.com), international distributors and to
an international wholesale customer network of approximately
2,200 store locations (through a distribution center located in
Bristol, England).
|
|
2. |
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation The fiscal year is the
fifty-two or fifty-three weeks ending the Saturday closest to
December 31. The fifty-two weeks ended January 1,
2005, the fifty-three weeks ended January 3, 2004 and the
fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2002 are sometimes
referred to as fiscal 2004, fiscal 2003, and fiscal 2002,
respectively.
Principles of Consolidation The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated.
Accounting Estimates The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Sales Recognition The Company sells its
products directly to retail customers and through wholesale
channels. Sales from the sale of merchandise to retail customers
are recognized at the time of sale while sales from wholesale
customers are recognized when risk of loss has passed to the
customers. The Company believes that these are the times when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has
occurred, the Companys price is fixed and collectability
is reasonably assured. Sales are recognized net of any
applicable discounts and allowances. Customers, be they retail
or wholesale, do have the right to return product in certain
limited situations. Such right of returns have not precluded
sales recognition because the Company has a long history with
such returns on which it constructs a reserve.
The Company sells gift certificates and gift cards. At the point
of sale of a gift certificate or gift card, the Company records
a deferred liability. Sales are recorded upon the redemption of
the gift certificate or gift card.
Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company
considers all short-term interest-bearing investments with
original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Such investments are classified by
34
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
the Company as held to maturity securities under the
provisions of Statement of Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. These
securities are stated at cost, adjusted for amortization of
discounts and premiums to maturity.
Marketable Securities The Company classifies
the marketable securities held in its deferred compensation plan
as trading securities under SFAS No. 115. In
accordance with the provisions of this statement, the investment
balance is stated at fair market value, based on quoted market
prices. Unrealized gains and losses are reflected in earnings;
realized gains and losses are also reflected in earnings and are
computed using the specific-identification method. As the assets
held in the deferred compensation plan reflect amounts due to
employees, but available for general creditors of the Company in
the event the Company becomes insolvent, the Company has
recorded the investment balance as a noncurrent asset and has
established a corresponding other long-term liability entitled
deferred compensation obligation on the balance
sheet.
The marketable securities held in this plan consist of
investments in mutual funds at January 1, 2005 and
January 3, 2004. Unrealized gains (losses) included in
earnings during the fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005,
the fifty-three weeks ended January 3, 2004 and the
fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2002 were $74, $364, and
$(171), respectively. Realized gains of $159 and $36 were
realized during the fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005
and December 28, 2002, respectively. There were no realized
gains for the fifty-three weeks ended January 3, 2004.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market on a last-in, first-out
(LIFO) basis. Inventory quantities on hand are
regularly reviewed, and where necessary provisions for excess
and obsolete inventory are recorded based primarily on the
Companys forecast of product demand and production
requirements.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant
and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated on the
straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the
various assets. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
5 to 40 years |
Computer equipment
|
|
2 to 5 years |
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
5 to 10 years |
Equipment
|
|
10 years |
Vehicles
|
|
5 years |
Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line
method over the lesser of the estimated life of the improvement
or the remaining life of the lease. Expenditures for normal
maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets The Company
accounts for goodwill and intangible assets in accordance with
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and certain
intangible assets are not amortized but are subject to an annual
impairment test. Changes in goodwill, tradename, customer list
and non-competes during the year ended January 1, 2005 were
due to the acquisition of GBI Marketing, Inc. (see Note 5).
At January 1, 2005, goodwill, all of which is included in
the wholesale segment, totaled $3,939.
The Company amortizes deferred financing costs using the
effective-interest method over the life of the related debt. On
May 19, 2004, the Company entered into a new
$200 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility
(the Credit Facility) with Citizens Bank of
Massachusetts and a syndicate of lenders. The Credit Facility
replaced the $150 million revolving credit facility that
was scheduled to expire on July 7, 2004. As a result of
this transaction, approximately $6,068 of deferred financing
costs and
35
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
$5,866 of related accumulated amortization were written off and
$644 of new financing costs was recorded during fiscal 2004.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets The Company
reviews the recoverability of its long-lived assets (property,
plant and equipment, customer list, tradename, goodwill and
trademarks) when events or changes in circumstances occur that
indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be
recoverable and at least annually in the case of tradename and
goodwill. This review is based on the Companys ability to
recover the carrying value of the assets from expected
undiscounted future cash flows. If an impairment is indicated,
the Company measures the loss based on the fair value of the
asset using various valuation techniques. If an impairment loss
exists, the amount of the loss will be recorded in the
consolidated statements of income. It is possible that future
events or circumstances could cause these estimates to change.
Advertising The Company expenses the costs of
advertising as they are incurred. Advertising expense was
$6,944, $8,712 and $7,745 for the fifty-two weeks ended
January 1, 2005, the fifty-three weeks ended
January 3, 2004 and the fifty-two weeks ended
December 28, 2002, respectively.
Income Taxes The Company recognizes deferred
tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the carrying
amounts and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using
expected tax rates in effect in the years in which the
differences are expected to reverse. Valuation allowances are
established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized. The
provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of
income is the actual computed tax obligation or receivable for
the period, plus or minus the change during the period in
deferred income tax assets and liabilities.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments At
January 1, 2005, the estimated fair values of all financial
instruments approximate their carrying amounts in the
consolidated balance sheets due to (i) the short-term
maturity of certain instruments or (ii) the variable
interest rate associated with certain instruments which have the
effect of repricing such instruments regularly.
Earnings per Share Basic earnings per share
is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders
(the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares
(the denominator) for the period. The computation of diluted
earnings per share is similar to basic earnings per share,
except that the denominator is increased to include the number
of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if
the potentially dilutive common shares had been issued. The
denominator in the calculation is based on the following
weighted-average number of common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Basic
|
|
|
48,749,000 |
|
|
|
53,024,000 |
|
|
|
53,896,000 |
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingently returnable shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
420,000 |
|
|
Shares issuable pursuant to option grants
|
|
|
387,000 |
|
|
|
395,000 |
|
|
|
370,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
49,136,000 |
|
|
|
53,419,000 |
|
|
|
54,686,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2005, January 3, 2004 and
December 28, 2002, approximately 17,000, 13,000 and
554,000 shares, respectively, issuable pursuant to option
grants were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings
per share due to their anti-dilutive effect.
Foreign Operations Assets and liabilities of
foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars at the
exchange rate on the balance sheet date. The results of foreign
subsidiary operations are translated using
36
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
average rates of exchange during each reporting period. Gains
and losses upon translation are deferred and reported as a
component of other comprehensive income. Foreign currency
transaction gains or losses, whether realized or unrealized, are
recorded directly in the statements of income.
Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income
includes all changes in equity during the period except those
resulting from transactions with owners of the Company. It has
two components: net income and other comprehensive income.
Accumulated other comprehensive income reported on the
Companys consolidated balance sheets consists of foreign
currency translation adjustments. Comprehensive income, net of
related tax effects (where applicable), is detailed in the
consolidated statements of stockholders equity.
Accounting Change in 2003 The Company
sponsors certain stock option plans. Prior to the third quarter
of 2003, the Company accounted for employee options or share
awards under the intrinsic-value method prescribed by Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees. Compensation expense, if any, was
recognized based on the difference between the fair value of the
common stock and the exercise price of the option on the
measurement date, as defined by Opinion No. 25. Pro forma
disclosures of net earnings and earnings per share had been
provided supplementally, as if the fair value method of
accounting defined in SFAS No. 123 Accounting
for Stock Based Compensation had been applied. Effective
September 27, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 using the
prospective transition method provided by SFAS No. 148
Accounting for Stock Based Compensation
Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of
SFAS No. 123. Under the prospective transition
method, the Company has valued all stock option grants beginning
with grants made in fiscal 2003. These are being expensed over
the vesting period based on the fair value at the date of the
grant. The use of the fair value method of accounting for
stock-based compensation resulted in a charge of $1,561 and $633
for the fiscal years ended January 1, 2005 and
January 3, 2004, respectively.
Awards under the Companys option plan vest, in general,
over a four year period. Therefore, the cost related to
stock-based employee compensation included in the determination
of net income for all periods presented in the Companys
historical consolidated statements of income is less than that
which would have been recognized if the fair value based method
had been applied to all awards since the original effective date
of SFAS No. 123.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income and
earnings per share if the fair value based method had been
applied to all outstanding and unvested awards in each period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
82,689 |
|
|
$ |
74,786 |
|
|
$ |
63,979 |
|
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net
income, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
Deduct: Total stock-based compensation expense determined under
fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects
|
|
|
(2,073 |
) |
|
|
(1,831 |
) |
|
|
(1,900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
81,560 |
|
|
$ |
73,391 |
|
|
$ |
62,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic-as reported
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
Basic-pro forma
|
|
$ |
1.67 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
37
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding
|
|
|
48,749,000 |
|
|
|
53,024,000 |
|
|
|
53,896,000 |
|
|
Diluted-as reported
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
Diluted-pro forma
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding
|
|
|
49,136,000 |
|
|
|
53,419,000 |
|
|
|
54,686,000 |
|
The following weighted-average assumptions were used to compute
the stock-based compensation expense that was recorded in the
Statement of Income in fiscal 2004 and 2003 and the pro forma
results of operations for fiscal 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Volatility
|
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
Dividend yield
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
3.20 |
% |
|
|
2.85 |
% |
|
|
2.79 |
% |
Expected lives
|
|
|
4 years |
|
|
|
4 years |
|
|
|
5 years |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements In November
2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 151 Inventory Costs,
an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4
(SFAS No. 151). The standard clarifies the accounting
for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling
costs, and wasted material. SFAS No. 151 is effective
for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after
June 15, 2005. The Company does not believe adoption of
SFAS No. 151 will have a material effect on its
financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R).
This statement revises FASB Statement No. 123 and
supersedes APB Opinion No. 25. SFAS No. 123(R)
focuses primarily on the accounting for transactions in which an
entity obtains employee services in share-based payment
transactions. SFAS No. 123(R) requires that the fair
value of such equity instruments be recognized as an expense in
the financial statements as services are performed. The
provisions of this Statement are effective for the first interim
reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. Under the
prospective transition method, the Company has valued all stock
option grants beginning with grants made in fiscal 2003. These
are being expensed over the vesting period based on the fair
value at the date of the grant. Accordingly, the Company will
adopt SFAS No. 123(R) using the modified prospective
method commencing with the quarter ending October 1, 2005
for all stock option grants awarded prior to 2003. The Company
estimates that the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) will
result in future additional compensation charges of
approximately $0.3 million during fiscal 2005 and there
will be no impact to cash flow from operations. The pro forma
table in Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per
share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition
provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock option grants
awarded prior to 2003.
In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 109-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 109
(SFAS 109), Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax
Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the
American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (FSP 109-1). FSP 109-1
clarifies that the manufacturers deduction provided for
under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (AJCA) should
be accounted for as a special deduction in accordance with
SFAS 109 and not as a tax rate reduction. The Company has
not completed the process of evaluating the impact that will
result from adopting this statement and is therefore unable to
disclose the impact that adopting FSP 109-1 will have on its
financial position and results of operations.
The FASB also issued FASB Staff Position No. 109-2,
Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Earnings
Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of
2004 (FSP 109-2).
38
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
The AJCA introduces a special one-time dividends received
deduction on the repatriation of certain foreign earnings to a
U.S. taxpayer (repatriation provision), provided certain
criteria are met. FSP 109-2 provides accounting and disclosure
guidance for the repatriation provision. The Company does not
believe adoption of FSP 109-2 will have a material effect on its
financial statements.
Prior-Year Reclassifications Certain prior
year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current
year presentation.
The components of inventory were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Finished goods
|
|
$ |
41,227 |
|
|
$ |
37,537 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
Raw materials and packaging
|
|
|
7,165 |
|
|
|
4,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,676 |
|
|
|
42,999 |
|
Less LIFO adjustment
|
|
|
(1,775 |
) |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
46,901 |
|
|
$ |
42,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Property, Plant and Equipment |
The components of property, plant and equipment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Land and improvements
|
|
$ |
6,705 |
|
|
$ |
5,039 |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
91,264 |
|
|
|
77,402 |
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
38,024 |
|
|
|
33,623 |
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
38,627 |
|
|
|
34,443 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
32,498 |
|
|
|
30,706 |
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
8,084 |
|
|
|
3,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
215,726 |
|
|
|
185,630 |
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(89,361 |
) |
|
|
(70,856 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
126,365 |
|
|
$ |
114,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant
and equipment was $20,341, $18,118 and $16,045 for the fifty-two
weeks ended January 1, 2005, the fifty-three weeks ended
January 3, 2004 and the fifty-two weeks ended
December 28, 2002, respectively. $81, $68 and $119 of
interest was capitalized in the fifty-two weeks ended
January 1, 2005, the fifty-three weeks ended
January 3, 2004 and the fifty-two weeks ended
December 28, 2002, respectively.
Historically, construction allowances were classified on the
balance sheet as a reduction of property, plant and equipment
and amortized as a reduction of depreciation and amortization
expense over the lease term. In the Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows, these allowances were historically recorded as a
reduction in the purchase of property and equipment. For the
year ended January 1, 2005, the Company
39
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
recorded a reclassification adjustment and increased property,
plant and equipment by $5,800 and increased deferred rent by the
same amount for construction allowances.
On June 7, 2004, the Company acquired substantially all of
the assets of GBI Marketing, Inc. (GBI), a privately
owned and operated distributor of selected gift products,
including Yankee Candle® products, to fundraising
organizations. The total purchase price was approximately
$14.6 million, $3.0 million of which is contingent and
will be recorded as additional goodwill upon the achievement of
certain performance objectives over the next three years. The
cash purchase price was borrowed under the Companys
$200 million unsecured Credit Facility. The following table
provides an allocation of the purchase price for the acquired
assets of GBI:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash purchase price
|
|
$ |
11,574 |
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
251 |
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
790 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,474 |
|
Customer list
|
|
|
3,160 |
|
Tradename
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total allocation
|
|
$ |
11,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
The customer list asset is being amortized over its estimated
useful life of four years. The Company plans to operate a
fundraising division using the name GBI Marketing (the GBI
Division) and, accordingly, the tradename is deemed to
have an indefinite life and will not be amortized. The goodwill
is tax deductible over a 15 year period. For segment
reporting purposes, the GBI Division is included in the
Wholesale segment. The GBI Divisions results of operations
were immaterial to the Companys operations during the
fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005. Historical pro forma
results of operations have not been provided due to
immateriality.
|
|
6. |
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
The following sets forth the intangible assets, excluding
goodwill, by major category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
January 3, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Net Book | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Net Book | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Value | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Indefinite life:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradename
|
|
$ |
1,960 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,960 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Finite life:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
(193 |
) |
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
6,068 |
|
|
|
(5,480 |
) |
|
|
588 |
|
|
Customer list
|
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
2,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-competes
|
|
|
790 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
6,299 |
|
|
|
(5,627 |
) |
|
|
672 |
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
$ |
6,785 |
|
|
$ |
(925 |
) |
|
$ |
5,860 |
|
|
$ |
6,299 |
|
|
$ |
(5,627 |
) |
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
The deferred financing costs are being amortized over the life
of the Credit Facility. Amortization expense related to the
deferred financing costs was $781 and $1,114 for fiscal years
2004 and 2003, respectively. The customer list and non-compete
agreements assets are being amortized over their estimated
useful lives of four years. Amortization expense related to the
customer list and non-compete agreements for the fiscal year
2004 was $570. The trademark asset is being amortized over
15 years. Amortization expense related to the trademark
asset was $15 for the fiscal years 2004 and 2003.
Aggregate amortization expense related to intangible assets at
January 1, 2005 in each of the next four fiscal years is
expected to be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
1,224 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
2008
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
The Company maintains cash balances at several financial
institutions. Accounts at each institution are insured by the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $100. Uninsured
balances aggregated $33,832 and $38,670 at January 1, 2005
and January 3, 2004, respectively. The Company extends
credit to its wholesale customers. For the fifty-two weeks ended
January 1, 2005, the fifty-three weeks ended
January 3, 2004 and the fifty-two weeks ended
December 28, 2002, no single customer accounted for more
than 7.0%, 6.0% and 4.0% of total sales, respectively.
Long-term debt is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Term loan
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,000 |
|
Revolving line of credit
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current portion
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On May 19, 2004, the Company entered into a new
$200 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility
(the Credit Facility) with Citizens Bank of
Massachusetts and a syndicate of lenders. This new Credit
Facility has two Tranches, a $150 million Tranche
(Tranche A) that expires on May 19, 2007
and a $50 million Tranche (Tranche B) that
expires on May 18, 2005. The new Credit Facility replaced
the $150 million revolving credit facility that was
scheduled to expire on July 7, 2004. This new Credit
Facility is being used by the Company for, among other things,
working capital, letters of credit, repurchase of the
Companys common stock and other general corporate
purposes. As of January 1, 2005 and January 3, 2004,
the unused portion of the revolving credit facility was $124,119
and $104,000, respectively.
Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility bear interest at a
rate equal to, at the Companys option, the Citizens Bank
Base Rate, or Eurodollar Rate. Eurodollar borrowings under
Tranche A of the
41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
Credit Facility include a margin rate ranging from 0.70% to
1.00% and borrowings under Tranche B include a margin rate
ranging from 0.75% to 1.05%. These rates vary depending on the
Companys outstanding borrowings. In addition, the Company
is required to pay the lenders a quarterly commitment fee on the
unused revolving loan commitment amount. The commitment fee
under Tranche A ranges from 0.15% to 0.25% and under
Tranche B ranges from 0.10% to 0.20%. Fees for outstanding
commercial and standby letters of credit range from 0.70% to
1.00%. The Company is also required to pay a utilization fee on
the total Credit Facility of 0.125% once outstanding borrowings
exceed $100 million. The weighted-average interest rate on
outstanding borrowings at January 1, 2005 was 2.8%.
The Credit Facility includes restrictions as to, among other
things, the amount of additional indebtedness, contingent
obligations, liens, investments, asset sales and capital
expenditures and requires the maintenance of minimum levels of
interest coverage. It also includes a restriction for the
payment of dividends. None of the restrictions contained in the
Credit Facility are expected to have a significant effect on the
ability of the Company to operate.
Aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term | |
|
|
Debt | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
Provision for Income Taxes |
Income tax expense, exclusive of that relating to extraordinary
items, consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifty-Two | |
|
Fifty-Three | |
|
Fifty-Two | |
|
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
Weeks Ended | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Federal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
34,721 |
|
|
$ |
32,956 |
|
|
$ |
23,694 |
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
13,237 |
|
|
|
10,863 |
|
|
|
13,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total federal
|
|
|
47,958 |
|
|
|
43,819 |
|
|
|
37,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
4,365 |
|
|
|
3,766 |
|
|
|
2,748 |
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total state
|
|
|
6,029 |
|
|
|
5,008 |
|
|
|
4,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax provision
|
|
$ |
53,987 |
|
|
$ |
48,827 |
|
|
$ |
41,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the recapitalization of the Company in 1998,
an election was made for federal and state income tax purposes
to value the assets and liabilities of the Company at fair
value. As a result of such election, there is a difference
between the financial reporting and tax bases of the
Companys assets and liabilities. This difference was
accounted for by recording a deferred tax asset of approximately
$175,700 with a corresponding credit to additional paid-in
capital. The deferred tax asset is being realized as these
differences, including tax goodwill, are deducted, principally
over a period of 15 years. In the
42
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
opinion of management, the Company will have sufficient profits
in the future to realize the deferred tax asset.
The tax effect of significant items comprising the
Companys net deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2005 | |
|
January 3, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Current | |
|
Non-current | |
|
Current | |
|
Non-current | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basis differential as a result of a basis step-up for tax
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
97,134 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
108,824 |
|
|
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,549 |
|
|
Deferred compensation arrangements, including stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
Employee benefits
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring accrual
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,397 |
|
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,898 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,549 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,876 |
|
|
$ |
84,697 |
|
|
$ |
3,128 |
|
|
$ |
100,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the statutory federal income tax rate and
the effective rate of the provision for income taxes consists of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifty-two | |
|
Fifty-three | |
|
Fifty-two | |
|
|
weeks ended | |
|
weeks ended | |
|
weeks ended | |
|
|
January 1, | |
|
January 3, | |
|
December 28, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Statutory federal income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State income taxes net of federal benefit
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Other, including increase in valuation allowance
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.5 |
% |
|
|
39.5 |
% |
|
|
39.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2005, the Company had foreign net operating
loss carryforwards totaling approximately $9,660. A valuation
allowance has been established for these net operating losses.
The Company maintains a profit sharing plan (the
Plan) under section 401(k) of the Internal
Revenue Code. Under the terms of the Plan the Company may make
discretionary matching contributions in an amount, if any, to be
determined annually based on a percentage of the employees
pretax contributions. Matching contributions, if made, are
subject to a maximum of 2% of the employees eligible
earnings, as defined in the Plan. Employer matching
contributions amounted to $996, $815 and $731 for fiscal 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company, at its discretion, may
also make annual profit sharing contributions to the Plan. For
the fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005 and the
fifty-three weeks ended January 3, 2004, the Company
incurred $350 and $500, respectively, for profit sharing
contributions. There were no profit sharing contributions in
fiscal 2002.
43
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
|
|
11. |
Deferred Compensation |
The Company has a deferred compensation agreement with certain
key employees. Under this agreement, the Company at its election
may match certain elective salary deferrals of eligible
employees compensation up to a maximum of $20 per
employee per year. Employer contributions amounted to $160, $135
and $94 for fiscal 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Benefits
under the plan will be paid in a lump sum upon termination of
the plan or termination of employment. Benefits paid to retired
or terminated employees during fiscal 2004 and 2002 were $450
and $263, respectively. There were no benefits paid in fiscal
2003.
Common Stock As of January 1, 2005 and
January 3, 2004, the Company had 47,309,000 and
104,397,000 shares of common stock (par value $.01) issued,
respectively. In connection with the recapitalization of the
Company in 1998, the Company repurchased for treasury
approximately 49,560,000 shares of common stock.
Subsequently, pursuant to a stock repurchase program adopted
May 9, 2003, the Company repurchased a total of
4,084,200 shares for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $100,000. These shares were also held in treasury.
On February 12, 2004, the Board of Directors authorized a
new stock repurchase program for the repurchase of up to
$100,000 of outstanding shares. Under this stock repurchase
program, the Company repurchased a total of
3,480,149 shares for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $100,000.
Effective July 1, 2004, companies incorporated in
Massachusetts became subject to the Massachusetts Business
Corporation Act, Chapter 156D. Chapter 156D eliminates
the concept of treasury shares and provides that shares
reacquired by a company are to be treated as authorized but
unissued shares of common stock. Accordingly, as of July 1,
2004, the Company has redesignated its existing treasury shares,
at an aggregate cost of $413,880 through January 1, 2005,
as authorized but unissued shares and has allocated this amount
to the common stocks par value, additional paid-in capital
and retained earnings.
Options to purchase common stock were granted to key employees
and directors of the Company in 1998 (the 1998
Plan). The options granted under the 1998 Plan were
nonqualified for tax purposes. For financial
reporting purposes, the award of the right to purchase stock and
the grant of options, in certain cases, were considered to be
below the fair value of the stock at the time of grant. The fair
value was determined based on an appraisal conducted by an
independent appraisal firm as of the relevant dates. The
differences between fair value and the purchase price or the
exercise price was being charged to compensation expense over
the relevant vesting period generally between three
and five years. In the fifty-three weeks ended
January 3, 2004 and the fifty-two weeks ended
December 28, 2002, such expense aggregated $88 and $434,
respectively. There was no expense recorded in the
fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005.
In addition to the options granted above, the Company adopted
the 1999 Employee Stock Option and Award Plan in June 1999 (the
1999 Plan). The 1999 Plan provides for the grant of
both incentive stock options intended to qualify under
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code and nonqualified
options. Options, granted to date under the 1999 Plan generally
have an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the
stock on the date of grant, are non-qualified and expire after
10 years. Options granted under the 1999 Plan vest ratably
over four years.
44
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
A summary of the status of option grants and changes during the
period ending on that date are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
|
|
Range of Exercise | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Grant Date Fair | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Prices | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at December 29, 2001
|
|
|
1,396,528 |
|
|
$ |
4.25-$21.125 |
|
|
$ |
11.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
236,500 |
|
|
|
16.80-21.30 |
|
|
|
21.16 |
|
|
$ |
8.95 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(126,679 |
) |
|
|
4.25-21.13 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
16.88 |
|
|
|
16.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 28, 2002
|
|
|
1,501,349 |
|
|
|
4.25-21.30 |
|
|
|
13.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
555,000 |
|
|
|
16.05-28.53 |
|
|
|
21.45 |
|
|
|
8.01 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(209,108 |
) |
|
|
4.25-21.13 |
|
|
|
7.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(10,750 |
) |
|
|
21.125-21.30 |
|
|
|
18.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 3, 2004
|
|
|
1,836,491 |
|
|
|
4.25-28.53 |
|
|
|
16.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
373,250 |
|
|
|
27.11-29.75 |
|
|
|
27.42 |
|
|
|
6.99 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(304,854 |
) |
|
|
4.25-21.30 |
|
|
|
13.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(33,000 |
) |
|
|
21.15-21.30 |
|
|
|
21.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2005
|
|
|
1,871,887 |
|
|
$ |
4.25-$29.75 |
|
|
$ |
19.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During fiscal 2004, the Company granted 68,650 performance share
awards when the market price of the Companys stock was
$27.99 per share. These awards were granted under the 1999 Plan
and are not included in the table above. Performance share
awards entitle recipients to receive shares of the
Companys common stock without payment of any purchase
price, with the number of shares actually received, if any,
contingent upon the Company satisfying specified financial
performance metrics (such as earnings per share) over the time
period specified in the award, all as pre-approved by the
Compensation Committee of the Companys Board of Directors.
Under the existing stock option and award plans, there are
449,726 shares available for future grants at
January 1, 2005. Options were exercisable for 836,512,
716,118 and 564,436 shares of common stock at a weighted
average exercise price of $15.93, $13.88 and $11.55 per
share at January 1, 2005, January 3, 2004 and
December 28, 2002, respectively.
The following table summarizes information about the
Companys stock options outstanding at January 1, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Options | |
|
Life | |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
(Years) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$4.25
|
|
|
41,030 |
|
|
|
41,030 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
|
11.88-16.20
|
|
|
551,250 |
|
|
|
406,250 |
|
|
|
6.26 |
|
16.80-18.00
|
|
|
199,107 |
|
|
|
158,732 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
21.13-29.75
|
|
|
1,080,500 |
|
|
|
230,500 |
|
|
|
8.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$4.25-$29.75
|
|
|
1,871,887 |
|
|
|
836,512 |
|
|
|
7.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
|
|
13. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
The Company leases most store locations, its corporate office
building, a distribution facility and a number of vehicles. The
operating leases, which expire in various years through 2016,
contain renewal options ranging from six months to
five years and provide for base rentals plus contingent
rentals thereafter, which are a function of sales volume. In
addition, the Company is required to pay real estate taxes,
maintenance and other operating expenses applicable to the
leased premises. Furthermore, several facility leases contain
rent escalation clauses.
The aggregate annual future minimum lease commitments under
operating leases as of January 1, 2005 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating | |
|
|
Leases | |
|
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
25,603 |
|
2006
|
|
|
24,451 |
|
2007
|
|
|
23,311 |
|
2008
|
|
|
22,665 |
|
2009
|
|
|
21,020 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
62,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$ |
179,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense, including contingent rentals, for the
fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005, the fifty-three
weeks ended January 3, 2004 and the fifty-two weeks
ended December 28, 2002 was approximately $23,426, $20,851
and $17,975, respectively. Included in rent expense were
contingent rental payments of approximately $623, $802 and $996,
for the fifty-two weeks ended January 1, 2005, the
fifty-three weeks ended January 3, 2004 and the
fifty-two weeks ended December 28, 2002, respectively.
The Company is engaged in various lawsuits, either as plaintiff
or defendant. In the opinion of management, the ultimate outcome
of these lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition, results of operations or
cash flows.
|
|
14. |
Segments of Enterprise and Related Information |
The Company has segmented its operations in a manner that
reflects how its chief operating decision-maker (the
CEO) reviews the results of the Company and its
subsidiaries businesses. The Company has two reportable
segments retail and wholesale. The identification of
these segments results from managements recognition that
while the product produced is similar, the type of customer for
the product and services and the methods used to distribute the
product are different.
The CEO evaluates both its retail and wholesale operations based
on an operating earnings measure. Such measure gives
recognition to specifically identifiable operating costs such as
cost of sales and selling expenses. Administrative charges are
generally not allocated to specific operating segments and are
accordingly reflected in the unallocated/corporate/other
category. Other components of the statement of income, which are
classified below operating income, are also not allocated by
segments. The Company does not account for or report assets,
capital expenditures or depreciation and amortization by segment
to the CEO.
46
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
The following are the relevant data for the fifty-two weeks
ended January 1, 2005, the fifty-three weeks ended
January 3, 2004 and the fifty-two weeks ended
December 28, 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance per | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unallocated/ | |
|
Consolidated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate/ | |
|
Statements of | |
|
|
Retail | |
|
Wholesale | |
|
Other | |
|
Income | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
283,482 |
|
|
$ |
270,720 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
554,202 |
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
192,821 |
|
|
|
130,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,683 |
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
76,720 |
|
|
|
115,631 |
|
|
|
(53,024 |
) |
|
|
139,327 |
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,651 |
) |
|
|
(2,651 |
) |
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,676 |
|
Fifty-Three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
266,649 |
|
|
$ |
241,988 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
508,637 |
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
179,826 |
|
|
|
113,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,321 |
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
75,968 |
|
|
|
101,576 |
|
|
|
(50,561 |
) |
|
|
126,983 |
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,370 |
) |
|
|
(3,370 |
) |
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,613 |
|
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended December 28, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$ |
239,920 |
|
|
$ |
204,922 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
444,842 |
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
153,520 |
|
|
|
96,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,094 |
|
Operating Margin
|
|
|
66,168 |
|
|
|
87,212 |
|
|
|
(43,549 |
) |
|
|
109,831 |
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,415 |
) |
|
|
(4,415 |
) |
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105,416 |
|
|
|
15. |
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
Balance at Beginning | |
|
Charged to Costs | |
|
Deductions from | |
|
End of Fiscal | |
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts |
|
of Fiscal Year | |
|
and Expenses | |
|
Reserves | |
|
Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 1, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
1,332 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
(807 |
) |
|
$ |
765 |
|
YEAR ENDED JANUARY 3, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
$ |
(309 |
) |
|
$ |
1,332 |
|
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 28, 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
(212 |
) |
|
$ |
325 |
|
Amounts charged to deductions from reserves represent the
write-off of uncollectible balances.
47
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Fifty-two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005,
Fifty-three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 and
Fifty-two Weeks Ended December 28,
2002 (Continued)
|
|
16. |
Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended January 1, 2005 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
April 3 | |
|
July 3 | |
|
October 2 | |
|
January 1 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Sales
|
|
$ |
106,519 |
|
|
$ |
100,908 |
|
|
$ |
127,913 |
|
|
$ |
218,862 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
47,372 |
|
|
|
43,895 |
|
|
|
54,906 |
|
|
|
84,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
59,147 |
|
|
|
57,013 |
|
|
|
73,007 |
|
|
|
134,516 |
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
27,852 |
|
|
|
29,763 |
|
|
|
31,814 |
|
|
|
41,905 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
13,240 |
|
|
|
12,312 |
|
|
|
13,862 |
|
|
|
13,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
18,055 |
|
|
|
14,938 |
|
|
|
27,331 |
|
|
|
79,002 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
809 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
(1,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
17,343 |
|
|
|
13,917 |
|
|
|
26,120 |
|
|
|
79,295 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,850 |
|
|
|
5,497 |
|
|
|
10,317 |
|
|
|
31,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
10,493 |
|
|
$ |
8,420 |
|
|
$ |
15,803 |
|
|
$ |
47,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fifty-Three Weeks Ended January 3, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
March 29 | |
|
June 28 | |
|
September 27 | |
|
January 3 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) | |
Sales
|
|
$ |
97,052 |
|
|
$ |
92,393 |
|
|
$ |
114,134 |
|
|
$ |
205,058 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
44,078 |
|
|
|
41,218 |
|
|
|
49,906 |
|
|
|
80,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
52,974 |
|
|
|
51,175 |
|
|
|
64,228 |
|
|
|
124,944 |
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
24,700 |
|
|
|
26,839 |
|
|
|
28,653 |
|
|
|
35,585 |
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
12,448 |
|
|
|
11,679 |
|
|
|
12,146 |
|
|
|
14,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations
|
|
|
15,826 |
|
|
|
12,657 |
|
|
|
23,429 |
|
|
|
75,070 |
|
Interest income
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
14,917 |
|
|
|
11,829 |
|
|
|
22,577 |
|
|
|
74,289 |
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
5,892 |
|
|
|
4,672 |
|
|
|
8,918 |
|
|
|
29,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
9,025 |
|
|
$ |
7,157 |
|
|
$ |
13,659 |
|
|
$ |
44,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
Not applicable.
|
|
Item 9A. |
Controls and Procedures |
1. Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer, or CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, evaluated
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act) as of January 1, 2005. Based on
this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of
January 1, 2005, our disclosure controls and procedures
were (1) designed to ensure that material information
relating to us, including our consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to our CEO and CFO by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report was being
prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the
reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
2. Internal Control over Financial Reporting
(a) Managements Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting
|
|
|
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal
control over financial reporting is defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or
under the supervision of, a companys principal executive
and principal financial officers and effected by the
companys board of directors, management and other
personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles and includes those
policies and procedures that: |
|
|
|
|
|
Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail
accurately and fairly reflect the transaction and dispositions
of the assets of the company; |
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and
that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and |
|
|
|
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements. |
|
|
|
Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of January 1, 2005. In making
this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO) in its Internal Control-Integrated
Framework. |
|
|
Based on our assessment, management believes that, as of
January 1, 2005 our internal control over financial
reporting is effective based on the above criteria. |
|
|
Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent auditors, have
issued an audit report on our assessment of our internal control
over financial reporting. This report appears on page 50 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
49
|
|
|
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting, no matter how well designed, may not
prevent or detect all material misstatements. Projections of any
current evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with
the policies or procedures may deteriorate, or other such
factors. |
(b) Attestation Report of Independent Auditor
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on |
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
|
|
|
Board of Directors and Stockholders |
|
The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. |
|
South Deerfield, Massachusetts |
|
|
|
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting included in Item 9A of Form 10-K, that
The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (the
Company) maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of January 1, 2005, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission. The Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit. |
|
|
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion. |
|
|
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements. |
|
|
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting
to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate. |
50
|
|
|
In our opinion, managements assessment that the Company
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of January 1, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material
respects, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring |
|
|
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Also in our opinion,
the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of January 1,
2005, based on the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. |
|
|
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated financial statements as of and for the fifty-two
weeks ended January 1, 2005 of the Company and our report
dated March 4, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements and includes an explanatory paragraph
relating to the change in the Companys accounting for
employee stock-based compensation in 2003. |
|
|
|
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |
|
|
Boston, Massachusetts |
|
March 4, 2005 |
|
|
(c) |
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
|
|
|
No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange
Act) occurred during the fiscal quarter ended January 1,
2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. |
|
|
Item 9B. |
Other Information |
Not applicable.
PART III
Certain information required by Part III is omitted from
this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by
reference to the definitive proxy statement with respect to our
2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 2,
2005 (the Proxy Statement), which we will file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than
120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this
Report.
|
|
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
Except as set forth below, the information required by this item
is incorporated by reference from the information under the
captions Election of Directors, Board of
Directors and Corporate Governance Information and
Report of the Audit Committee of the Board of
Directors contained in the Proxy Statement and the caption
Executive Officers of the Registrant in Part I
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference from the information under the captions
Compensation of Directors, Compensation of
Executive Officers, Employment Contracts,
Termination of Employment and Change-in-Control
Arrangements, and Report of the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors contained in the Proxy
Statement.
51
|
|
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference from the information under the captions Equity
Compensation Plans and Stock Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management contained in the Proxy
Statement.
|
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference from the information under the caption Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions contained in the
Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference from the information under the caption Principal
Accountant Fees and Services contained in the Proxy
Statement.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements listed below are included
in this document under Item 8.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Income
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
(b) |
Exhibits
See the exhibit index accompanying this filing. |
|
|
(c) |
Financial Statement Schedules
All schedules for which provision is made in the applicable
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission have been
omitted because the information is disclosed in the Consolidated
Financial Statements or because such schedules are not required
or not applicable. |
52
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Form of Restated Articles of Organization of The Yankee Candle
Company, Inc.(1) |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Form of Amended and Restated By-Laws of The Yankee Candle
Company, Inc.(1) |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Form of Common Stock Certificate.(1) |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Form of outside director Stock Option Agreement. (1)+ |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Form of outside director Stockholders Agreement. (1)+ |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Form of Employee Stockholders Agreement.(1)+ |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
The Yankee Candle Company Inc. Employee Stock Option Plan and
form of Stock Option Agreement.(1)+ |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. 1999 Stock Option and Award
Plan.(1)+ |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Form of Stockholders Agreement between The Yankee Candle
Company, Inc. and employees.(1)+ |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement between The Yankee Candle
Company, Inc. and its directors and executive officers.(1) |
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Form of Credit Agreement among The Yankee Candle Company, Inc.,
The Chase Manhattan Bank, as sole administrative agent, and the
banks and other financial institutions party thereto.(1) |
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Employment Letter Agreement dated March 31, 2001 between
The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. and Craig W. Rydin.(2)+ |
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Employment Letter Agreement dated August 31, 2000 between
The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. and Paul J. Hill (3)+ |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Employment Letter Agreement dated May 2, 2001 between The
Yankee Candle Company, Inc. and Harlan Kent.(3)+ |
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Form of Credit Agreement among The Yankee Candle Company, Inc.,
Citizens Bank of Massachusetts, as sole administrative agent,
and other banks and financial institutions party thereto.(4) |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Management Incentive Plan for 2004 Fiscal Year for Executive
Committee Members Corporate (5)+ |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Management Incentive Plan for 2004 Fiscal Year for Executive
Committee Members Business Unit (5)+ |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Management Incentive Plan for the 2005 Fiscal Year (6)+ |
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Form of Award of Performance Shares Agreement (7)+ |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
2005 Director Compensation Plan (7)+ |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Deloitte and Touche LLP(7) |
|
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(7) |
|
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(7) |
|
32 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.(7) |
|
32 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (7) |
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Registration
Statements on Form S-1 (File No. 333-76397). |
|
(2) |
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of fiscal 2001. |
|
(3) |
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for fiscal 2001. |
|
(4) |
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of fiscal 2004. |
53
|
|
(5) |
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of fiscal 2005. |
|
(6) |
Incorporated by reference from the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K dated February 14, 2005. |
|
(7) |
Filed herewith. |
|
|
|
|
+ |
Compensation contract/plan affecting Companys Management
and/or Board of Directors. |
54
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized, on March 7, 2005.
|
|
|
The Yankee Candle Company, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
Craig W. Rydin |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Capacity |
|
|
|
/s/ CRAIG W. RYDIN
Craig
W. Rydin |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
/s/ ROBERT R. SPELLMAN
Robert
R. Spellman |
|
Director, Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
|
/s/ GERALD F. LYNCH
Gerald
F. Lynch |
|
Vice President, Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
/s/ DALE F. FREY
Dale
F. Frey |
|
Director |
|
/s/ MICHAEL F. HINES
Michael
F. Hines |
|
Director |
|
/s/ SANDRA J. HORBACH
Sandra
J. Horbach |
|
Director |
|
/s/ CAROL M. MEYROWITZ
Carol
M. Meyrowitz |
|
Director |
|
/s/ ROBERT J.
OCONNELL
Robert
J. OConnell |
|
Director |
|
/s/ MICHAEL B. POLK
Michael
B. Polk |
|
Director |
|
/s/ RONALD L. SARGENT
Ronald
L. Sargent |
|
Director |
|
/s/ DOREEN A. WRIGHT
Doreen
A. Wright |
|
Director |
55