UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004

OR

For the transition period from                to               

Commission File Number 0-25040

APPLIX, INC.

289 Turnpike Road, Westborough, Massachusetts 01581
(Address of principal executive offices)

(508) 870-0300
(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

     As of May 5, 2004, there were 14,209,620 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.0025 par value, outstanding.

APPLIX, INC.

Form 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2004

Table of Contents

     Applix and TM1 are registered trademarks of Applix, Inc. TM1 Integra, Applix Interactive Planning, and TM1 Web are trademarks of Applix, Inc. All other trademarks and company names mentioned are the property of their respective owners. All rights reserved.

     Certain information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is forward-looking in nature. All statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or made by management of Applix, Inc. (“Applix” or the “Company”) and its subsidiaries, other than statements of historical facts, are forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements regarding Applix’s future financial results, operating results, business strategies, projected costs, products, competitive positions and plans and objectives of management for future operations. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by terminology such as “may”, “ will”, “should”, “would”, “expect”, “plan”, “anticipates”, “intend”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential”, “continue”, or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. Any expectations based on these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and other important factors, including those discussed in the section below entitled “Factors that May Affect Future Results”. These and many other factors could affect Applix’s future financial and operating results, and could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations based on forward-looking statements made in this document or elsewhere by Applix or on its behalf. Applix does not undertake an obligation to update its forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances.

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Applix, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

Applix, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Applix, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

APPLIX, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. The Company

     Applix, Inc. (“ the Company”) is a global provider of Business Intelligence (BI) and Business Performance Management (BPM) solutions, focused on interactive planning, budgeting and analytics, as well as financial reporting, which includes Applix TM1 and Applix Integra technology and related modules, such as Applix TM1 Web. The Company’s products represent one principal business segment, which the Company reports as its continuing operations.

     Historically, the Company also provided customer relationship management (CRM) solutions. The Company sold certain assets relating to its CRM software solutions (the “CRM Business”) in the first quarter of 2003 (See Note 5). The Company’s operating results reflect the CRM Business up through the sale of the business, which occurred on January 21, 2003, followed by a March 17, 2003 closing of certain assets relating to the German CRM operations.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

     The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) including instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three month period ended March 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2004. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Use of Estimates

     The preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates or assumptions. Estimates and assumptions in these financial statements relate to, among other items, the useful lives of fixed assets, capitalized software costs and their realizability, intangible assets, domestic and foreign income tax liabilities, valuation of deferred tax assets, the allowance for doubtful accounts, accrued expenses, deferred revenue and certain post-closing adjustments and transaction costs related to the sale of the Company’s CRM Business.

Revenue Recognition

     The Company generates revenues mainly from licensing the rights to use its software products and providing services. The Company sells products primarily through a direct sales force, indirect channel partners and Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”). The Company accounts for software revenue transactions in accordance with Statement of Position (“SOP”) 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended. Revenues from software arrangements are recognized when:

•

Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, which is typically when a non-cancelable sales and software license agreement has been signed, or purchase order has been received;

6

•		Delivery has occurred. If the assumption by the customer of the risks and rewards of its licensing rights occurs upon the delivery to the carrier (FOB Shipping Point), then delivery occurs upon shipment (which is typically the case). If assumption of such risks and rewards occurs upon delivery to the customer (FOB Destination), then delivery occurs upon receipt by the customer. In all instances delivery includes electronic delivery of authorization keys to the customer;
•		The customer’s fee is deemed to be fixed or determinable and free of contingencies or significant uncertainties;
•		Collectibility is probable; and
•		Vendor specific objective evidence of fair value exists for all undelivered elements, typically maintenance and professional services.

     The Company also uses the residual method under SOP 98-9, “Modification of SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition with Respect to Certain Transactions”. Under the residual method, the fair value of the undelivered elements is deferred and the remaining portion of the arrangement fee is allocated to the delivered elements and is recognized as revenue, assuming all other conditions for revenue recognition have been satisfied. Substantially all of the Company’s product revenue is recognized in this manner. If the Company cannot determine the fair value of any undelivered element included in an arrangement, the Company will defer revenue until all elements are delivered, until services are performed or until fair value of the undelivered elements can be objectively determined. In circumstances where the Company offers significant and incremental fair value discounts for future purchases of other software products or services to its customers as part of an arrangement, utilizing the residual method the Company defers the value of the discount and recognizes such discount to revenue as the related product or service is delivered.

     As part of an arrangement, end-user customers typically purchase maintenance contracts. Maintenance services include telephone and Web based support as well as rights to unspecified upgrades and enhancements, when and if the Company makes them generally available. Substantially all of the Company’s software license revenue is earned from perpetual licenses of off-the-shelf software requiring no modification or customization. Therefore, professional services are deemed to be non-essential to the functionality of the software and typically are for implementation planning, loading of software, training, building simple interfaces and running test data.

     In instances where the services are deemed to be essential to the functionality of the software, both license and service revenues are recognized together on a percentage of completion basis utilizing hours incurred to date as a percentage of total estimated hours to complete the project.

     Revenues from maintenance services are recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance contract period, which is typically one year, based on vendor specific objective evidence of fair value. Vendor specific objective evidence of fair value is based upon the amount charged when maintenance is purchased separately, which is typically the contract’s renewal rate.

     Revenues from professional services are generally recognized based on vendor specific objective evidence of fair value when: (1) a non-cancelable agreement for the services has been signed or a customer’s purchase order has been received; and (2) the professional services have been delivered. Vendor specific objective evidence of fair value is based upon the price charged when these services are sold separately and is typically an hourly rate for professional services and a per class rate for training. Revenues for consulting services are generally recognized on a time and material basis as services are delivered. Based upon the Company’s experience in completing product implementations, it has determined that these services are typically delivered within three months or less subsequent to the contract signing.

     The Company’s license arrangements with its end-user customers and indirect channel partners do not include any rights of return or price protection, nor do arrangements with indirect channel partners include any sell-through contingencies. In those instances where the Company has granted a customer rights to when-and-if available additional products, the Company recognizes the arrangement fee ratably over the term of the agreement.

     Generally, the Company’s arrangements with end-user customers and indirect channel partners do not include any acceptance provisions. In those cases in which significant uncertainties exist with respect to customer acceptance or in which specific customer acceptance criteria are included in the arrangement, the Company defers the entire arrangement fee and recognizes revenue, assuming all other conditions for revenue recognition have been satisfied, when the uncertainty regarding acceptance is resolved as generally evidenced by written acceptance by the customer. The Company’s arrangements with indirect channel partners and end-user customers do include a standard warranty provision whereby the Company will use reasonable efforts to cure material nonconformity

7

or defects of the software from the Company’s published specifications. The standard warranty provision does not provide the indirect channel partners or end-user customer with the right of refund. In very limited instances, the Company has granted the right to refund for an extended period if the arrangement is terminated because the product does not meet the Company’s published technical specifications, and the Company is unable to reasonably cure the nonconformity or defect. Generally, the Company determines that this warranty provision is not an acceptance provision and therefore should be accounted for as a warranty in accordance with SFAS No. 5.

     At the time the Company enters into an arrangement, the Company assesses the probability of collection of the fee and the payment terms granted to the customer. For end-user customers and indirect channel partners, the Company’s typical payment terms are due within 30 days of invoice date. However, in those cases where payment terms are greater than 30 days, the Company does not recognize revenue from the arrangement fee unless the payment is due within 90 days. If the payment terms for the arrangement are considered extended (greater than 90 days), the Company defers revenue under these arrangements and such revenue is recognized, assuming all other conditions for revenue recognition have been satisfied, when the payment of the arrangement fee becomes due.

     In some instances indirect channel partners provide first level maintenance services to the end-user customer and the Company provides second level maintenance support to the indirect channel partner. The Company accounts for amounts received in these arrangements in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent” (“EITF 99-19”). When the Company receives a net fee from the indirect channel partner to provide second level support to the indirect channel partner, this amount is recorded as revenue over the term of the maintenance period at the net amount received because the Company does not collect the fees from the end-user customer, does not have latitude in establishing the price paid by the end-user customer for maintenance services, and does not have the latitude to select the supplier providing first level support. However, in circumstances where the Company renews maintenance contracts directly with the end-user customers, receives payment for the gross amount of the maintenance fee, has the ability to select the supplier for first level support, and the Company believes that it is the primary obligor for first level support to the end customer, the Company records revenue for the gross amounts received. In such circumstances, the Company remits a portion of the payment received to the indirect channel partner to provide first level support to the end-user customer, and such amounts are capitalized and amortized over the maintenance period. Revenue recorded for amounts collected by the Company and remitted to the indirect channel partners for such renewals aggregated $ 245,000 and $155,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Income Taxes

     Deferred tax assets and liabilities are provided for differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and for loss and credit carryforwards and are measured using enacted income tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the temporary differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is established against net deferred tax assets if, based on the weighted available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

     For the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $27,000 and $649,000, respectively. The provision for the three months ended March 31, 2003 includes $355,000 for United States (federal and state) and foreign income taxes related to the Company’s sale of its CRM Business.

     Additionally, during 2003, the Company evaluated its ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards and the impact of Section 382 of the United States (“U.S.”) Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Section 382”) including use of such loss carryforwards to offset its U.S. gain on the sale of the U.S. portion of its CRM Business. Section 382 provides annual limitations to the use of net operating loss carry forwards against future taxable income in the event of a change of ownership. The Company has completed a full analysis of these ownership changes and does not believe that the changes in ownership will increase the Company’s income tax expense as a result of a limitation on its ability to use its net operating loss carry forwards.

     The Company has provided for amounts due in various foreign tax jurisdictions. Judgment is required in determining the Company’s worldwide income tax expense provision based upon the evaluation of the estimated forecasted results for the year as a whole. Uncertainties may arise as a consequence of cost reimbursement arrangements among related entities. Although management believes its estimates are reasonable, no assurance can be given that the final tax outcome of these matters will not be different from that which is reflected in the Company’s historical income tax provisions and accruals. Such differences could have a material impact on the Company’s income tax provision and operating results in the period in which such determination is made.

8

Stock-Based Compensation

     The Company periodically grants stock options for a fixed number of shares to employees and directors with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the shares at the date of the grant. The Company accounts for stock option grants to employees and directors using the intrinsic value method and intends to continue to do so. Under the intrinsic value method, compensation associated with stock awards to employees and directors is determined as the difference, if any, between the current fair value of the underlying common stock on the date compensation is measured and the price the employee or director must pay to exercise the award. The measurement date for employee awards is generally the date of grant.

     If stock-based compensation expense had been recorded based on the fair value of stock awards at the date of grant, the Company’s net income would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts presented below (in thousands, except for per share amounts):

     The fair value for stock option awards is estimated at the date of the grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing model, assuming no dividends and the following assumptions:

9

3. Net Income Per Share

     Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect, if any, of potential common shares, which consists of stock options. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per share (in thousands, except for per share amounts):

     The Company had an additional 635,588 and 3,445,000 of anti-dilutive common stock equivalents (stock options) outstanding for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, which were not included in the calculation of diluted net income per share as the stock option exercise price exceeded the average market price for the respective periods.

4. Comprehensive Income (Loss)

     Components of comprehensive income include net income and certain transactions that have generally been reported in the consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity. Other comprehensive income (loss) includes gains and losses from foreign currency translation adjustments.

10

5. Net Gain from Sale of CRM Business

     In the first quarter of 2003, the Company completed the sale of the CRM Business to iET Acquisition, LLC (“iET”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Platinum Equity Holdings, LLC for $5,750,000 in cash consideration, of which $487,000 was paid to iET for net working capital adjustments and $3,552,000 in net assumed liabilities. The sale excluded approximately $2,800,000 in net accounts receivable generated from the sale of CRM products and services.

     iET paid $4,250,000 of the Purchase Price in cash at the initial closing and paid an additional $1,500,000 in cash on March 17, 2003 upon the completion of the closing of certain assets of the Company’s Germany subsidiary, Applix GmbH. During the period of

11

the initial closing and completion of the Company’s Germany subsidiary closing, Applix GmbH continued to resell the CRM software products sold to iET, and to provide professional services and maintenance support under a reseller’s agreement between the Company and iET.

     The Company’s results for three months ended March 31, 2003 included CRM license revenues of $253,000 and CRM professional services and maintenance revenues of $999,000.

      In the first quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a net gain before tax of $8,000,000, which includes net cash consideration of $5,525,000, which reflects $262,000 paid back to iET, and $3,552,000 of net liabilities assumed by iET less transaction costs of $1,077,000. The purchase price is subject to certain post closing adjustments relating to the net working capital as set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and iET, dated January 21, 2003.

     In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recorded an adjustment, a change in estimates, of $90,000 to reduce the net gain from the sale of the CRM Business and paid back to iET an additional $225,000 of the total cash consideration received due to post-closing adjustments.

6. Commitments and Contingencies

Contingencies

     From time to time, the Company is a party to routine litigation and proceedings in the ordinary course of business. The Company is not aware of any current litigation to which the Company is or may be a party that the Company believes could materially adversely affect its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

     On June 16, 2003, the Company announced that is was the subject of an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission related to the restatement of the Company’s financial statements for fiscal years 2001 and 2002. The Company is cooperating fully with the SEC in this matter.

Commitments

     In January 2004, the Company entered into a lease amendment of its original lease with its landlord for its Westborough, MA headquarters. The amendment required the payment of a $3,000,000 restructuring fee to the landlord, which was paid on January 22, 2004. Per terms of the amendment, the original lease was amended as follows: 1) a reduction in the amount of space leased from 49,960 square feet to 24,376 square feet, 2) a reduction in annual rental payments from approximately $1,400,000 to $550,000, 3) a reduction in remaining term of the lease from 9 3/4 years to 7 years, and 4) a reduction of the amount of the required irrevocable standby letter of credit from $817,000 to $400,000. The payment required pursuant to the release of excess space was expensed in 2003 as part of the restructuring charge recorded (See Note 7).

Indemnifications

     The Company frequently has agreed to indemnification provisions in software license agreements with customers and in its real estate leases in the ordinary course of its business.

     With respect to software license agreements, these indemnifications generally include provisions indemnifying the customer against losses, expenses, and liabilities from damages that may be awarded against the customer in the event the Company’s software is found to infringe upon a patent or copyright of a third party. The software license agreements generally limit the scope of and remedies for such indemnification obligations in a variety of industry-standard respects, including but not limited to certain geography-based scope limitations, the right to replace or modify an infringing product, and the right to terminate the license and refund a portion of the original license fee within a defined period of time from the original licensing date if a remedy is not commercially practical. The Company believes its internal development processes and other policies and practices limit its exposure related to the indemnification provisions of the software license agreements. In addition, the Company requires its employees to sign an agreement, which assigns the rights to its employees’ development work to the Company. To date, the Company has not had to reimburse any of its customers for any losses related to these indemnification provisions.

     With respect to real estate lease agreements, these indemnifications typically apply to claims asserted against the landlord relating to personal injury and property damage at the leased premises or to certain breaches of the Company’s contractual obligations. The

12

term of these indemnification provisions generally survive the termination of the agreement, although the provision has the most relevance during the contract term and for a short period of time thereafter. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make under these indemnification provisions is unlimited. The Company has purchased insurance that reduces its monetary exposure for landlord indemnifications. The Company has never paid any amounts to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification provisions. Accordingly, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification arrangements is minimal.

7. Restructuring Expenses

     In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company adopted a plan of restructuring to reduce operating costs. Under this plan, the Company had ceased to use and made the determination that it had no future use and benefit of certain space pertaining to its Westborough headquarters’ office lease. The Company also commenced negotiations with its landlord to settle amounts related to its lease in general and the abandoned space in particular. These negotiations were completed in January 2004, and as a result, the Company was able to estimate the cost to exit this facility. Additionally, the Company had determined that it would dispose of certain assets, which were removed from service shortly after the implementation of the plan. As a result of this restructuring plan, the Company recorded a restructuring expense for this space of $3,238,000. Restructuring expense included a $3,000,000 fee paid to the landlord for the abandoned space, an adjustment of $162,000 to reduce the Company’s deferred rent expense, adjusted transaction costs of $350,000 for professional service fees (brokerage and legal) and $50,000 in non-cash charges relating to the disposition of certain assets.

     The accrued restructuring expenses, as well as the Company’s 2004 adjustments and payments made against accruals are detailed as follows:

8. Discontinued Operations

     In December 2000, the Board of Directors committed a plan to dispose of the operations of the Company’s VistaSource business. On March 31, 2001, the Company completed the sale of the VistaSource business unit. The Company’s results of operations for the quarters ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 included $26,000 and $33,000, respectively, in expenses primarily relating to legal and accounting costs associated with winding down the VistaSource business, a discontinued operation.

9. Bank Credit Facilities

     On March 19, 2004, the Company entered into two credit facilities, providing for loans, with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). The first facility, a domestic working capital line of credit, has an interest rate of prime plus 1.00% per annum and is in the aggregate principal amount of up to the lesser of (i) $2,000,000 or (ii) an amount based upon a percentage the Company’s qualifying domestic accounts receivable. The second facility, an equipment line of credit, has an interest rate of prime plus 1.50% per annum and is in the aggregate principal amount of up to $1,000,000. The obligations of the Company to SVB are guaranteed the Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and such domestic subsidiaries. The two

13

credit facilities will expire on March 18, 2005. As of March 31, 2004, there were no amounts outstanding under these two credit facilities.

10. Executive Termination Costs

     On February 27, 2003, the Company entered into a Severance Agreement with an executive of the Company. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company has agreed to pay the executive 15 months of salary and provide the executive certain medical benefits during the 15-month period after his termination. In addition, the Company forgave all outstanding principal and interest due under a Secured Promissory Note dated July 30, 2000 in the principal amount of $225,000, executed pursuant to the Company’s Executive Stock Loan Purchase Program. Pursuant to the Severance Agreement, the executive transferred to the Company 51,429 shares of the Company’s common stock, which were held by the Company in treasury as of March 31, 2004, which stock the executive had purchased using the funds loaned to the executive pursuant to such Secured Promissory Note. During the first quarter of 2003, the Company recorded $356,000 in costs related to the termination of employment of the executive. The severance amounts are to be paid in 15 equal installments, and the remaining unpaid balance as of March 31, 2004 was $38,000.

11. Stockholders’ Equity

     On February 3, 2004, the Board of Directors of Company adopted, subject to stockholder approval, the 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (“2004 Plan”). Under the 2004 Plan, up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits and other similar events) may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the 2004 Plan. The 2004 Plan is intended to replace the Company’s 1994 Equity Incentive Plan (“1994 Plan”), which expires by its terms on April 10, 2004 and no additional stock awards can be issued under the 1994 Plan after its expiration.

     On February 3, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted, subject to stockholder approval, an amendment to the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan increasing the total number of shares reserved for issuance by an additional 500,000 shares of common stock to an aggregate of 1,300,000 shares of common stock.

     On February 27, 2004, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors along with another investor, who is related to the Board member, purchased a total 657,894 shares of common stock for approximately $3,000,000. The board member and the other investor each purchased 328,947 shares of common stock. The purchase price of the shares was $4.56 per share, which represents the average of the last reported sales price per share of Applix common stock on the NASDAQ SmallCap Market over the five consecutive trading days ending February 26, 2004.

     On February 27, 2004, the Company amended its Rights Agreement. The amendment provided that the purchasing Board member and any person or entity deemed to be affiliated or associated with him shall not be considered an “Acquiring Person”, as defined under the Rights Agreement, unless the board member together with affiliates become the beneficial owner of 20% or more of the shares of common stock of the Company then outstanding.

14

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview of the Company’s Operations

     The Company is a global provider of business intelligence (“BI”) and business performance management (“BPM”) solutions, focused on interactive planning, budgeting, forecasting and analytics as well as financial reporting. These solutions enable customers to continuously manage and monitor performance across financial and operational functions within the enterprise, with the views of past performance, the current state of business, and future opportunities.

     The Company sells its products through both a direct sales force and an expanding network of partners, both domestically and internationally. These organizations provide additional implementation resources, domain expertise and complementary applications using the Company’s software products. The Company continues to focus its efforts selling and marketing the licensing and maintenance of its products while increasing the engagement of partners to provide consulting services on the implementation and integration of its product.

     The Company has decided to strategically and tactically focus its efforts including development, sales and marketing on its BI and BPM products. In the first quarter of 2003, the Company sold its customer relationship management business (“CRM Business”) (see Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements). The Company’s operating results reflect the operations of the CRM Business up through its sale, which occurred on January 21, 2003, followed by a March 17, 2003 closing relating to the German component of the CRM Business. The Company is currently only selling BPM and BI products and related services.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

     This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations discusses the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Management bases its estimates and assumptions on expected or known trends or events, historical experience and various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

     Management believes the following critical accounting policies, among others, involve the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

•		Revenue Recognition
•		Accounts Receivable and Bad Debt
•		Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and Related Impairment
•		Restructuring
•		Deferred Income Taxes

     These policies are unchanged from those used to prepare the 2003 annual financial statements. For more information regarding our critical accounting policies, we refer the reader to the discussion contained in Item 7 under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003, contained within our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, and to Note 2 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

15

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     Three Months Ended March 31, 2004 and 2003

Revenues

     Total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004 were $7,383,000, consisting exclusively of BI/BPM revenues, compared to $6,833,000 consisting of $5,581,000 of BI/BPM revenues and $1,252,000 of CRM revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The increase in total revenues was primarily due to an increase of $1,076,000 in the Company’s software license revenues, which was partially offset by a decrease of $526,000 in professional services and maintenance revenues. This decrease is primarily due to a $999,000 decrease in total professional services and maintenance revenues as a result of the sale of the CRM Business in the first quarter of 2003 and an increased reliance on the Company’s partners to provide consulting services.

Software License Revenues

     Software license revenues increased by $1,076,000 to $3,767,000, or 51% of total revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2004, from $2,691,000, or 39% of total revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Software license revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004 were solely from BI/BPM products. BI/BPM software license revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004 represented a 55% increase from $2,438,000 of BI/BPM software license revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The increase in software license revenues was primarily due to an increase in license transactions for BI/BPM products, which included six deals greater than $100,000 each, totaling $904,000, for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to three deals greater than $100,000 each, totaling $394,000, for the three months ended March 31, 2003.

     Domestic license revenues increased by $507,000 to $1,238,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $731,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. International license revenues increased by $569,000 to $2,529,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $1,960,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003.

     The Company markets its products through its direct sales force and indirect partners. The Company continues to focus on complementing its direct sales force with indirect channel partners, which consist of Original Equipment Manufacturers (“OEMs”), Value Added Resellers (“VARs”), independent distributors and sales agents.

16

     The Company’s software license to professional services and maintenance revenues mix was 51% and 49%, respectively, and 39% and 61%, respectively, of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company continues to make progress towards its target revenue mix of 60%/40%.

Professional Services and Maintenance Revenues

     Professional services and maintenance revenues decreased to $3,616,000, or 49% of total revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to $4,142,000, or 61% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2003. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, maintenance revenues increased $178,000 to $3,151,000, compared to $2,973,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003, and professional services decreased $704,000 to $465,000, compared to $1,169,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The Company expects maintenance revenues to increase due to strong customer maintenance renewal rates and the greater use of the Company’s partners for professional services. The decrease in professional services and maintenance revenues was primarily due to the sale of the CRM Business in the three months ended March 31, 2003, as well as the Company’s focus on more selective consulting engagements and greater reliance on its partners. The Company will continue to rely primarily on its partners to provide consulting services, including BI/BPM product implementations, as the Company focuses on maintenance services, which includes telephonic support, unspecified product upgrades and bug fixes and patches.

Cost of Revenues

(A) Gross margins as a percentage of related revenues.

Cost of Software License Revenues

     Cost of software license revenues consists primarily of third-party software royalties, cost of product packaging and documentation materials, and amortization of capitalized software costs. Cost of software license revenues was $206,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to $412,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The decrease in the cost of license revenues was primarily due to a decrease in the amortization of capitalized software development costs and a decrease in third-party software royalties. As a percentage of software license revenues, cost of software license revenues decreased to 5% for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to 15% for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Cost of software license revenues is anticipated to continue to decrease due to previously capitalized software development costs becoming fully amortized in the second quarter of 2004, and a decrease in third-party software royalties associated with the reselling of a third-party product.

17

Cost of Professional Services and Maintenance Revenues

     The cost of professional services and maintenance revenues consists primarily of personnel salaries and benefits, facilities and information system costs incurred to provide consulting, training and customer support and payments to indirect channel partners to provide first level support to end-user customers, which is generally amortized over the 12-month maintenance support period of the underlying contract with the end-user customer. Cost of professional services and maintenance revenues decreased to $1,023,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $1,734,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The decrease in the cost of professional services and maintenance revenues was primarily due to consultants transferred with the sale of the CRM Business. Professional services and maintenance revenues gross margin as a percentage of professional services revenues improved to 28% for the three months ended March 31, 2004 as compared to 42% for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The improvements in gross margins was primarily due to the reduction in consulting revenues and costs from the sale of the CRM Business in the first quarter of 2003 and a change in revenue mix from lower margin consulting revenues to higher margin maintenance revenues. The Company will continue to focus on the utilization of partners to deliver consulting services for product implementations and customization of its product.

Operating Expenses

Sales and Marketing Expenses

     Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, commissions and bonuses for the Company’s sales and marketing personnel, field office expenses, travel and entertainment, promotional and advertising expenses and the cost of the Company’s international operations, which are sales operations. Sales and marketing expenses decreased 7% to $2,513,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $2,707,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Sales and marketing expenses decreased as a percentage of total revenue to 34% for three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to 40% for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The decreases in sales and marketing expenses were primarily due to a reduction in salaries, commissions, bonuses and benefits from those employees transferred in connection with the sale of the CRM Business in the first quarter of 2003. The Company anticipates increasing its staffing in sales and marketing, including its direct sales force and presales technical staff, and making investments in securing new partner relationships, including OEM relationships. As a result, there may be an increase in sales and marketing costs in 2004 as compared to 2003. The Company will, however, continue to closely monitor discretionary costs.

Product Development Expenses

     Product development expenses include costs associated with the development of new products, enhancements of existing products and quality assurance activities, and consist primarily of employee salaries and benefits, consulting costs and the cost of software development tools. The Company capitalizes product development costs during the required capitalization period once the Company has reached technological feasibility through general release of its software products. The Company considers technological feasibility to be achieved when a product design and working model of the software product have been completed and the software product is ready for initial customer testing. Capitalized software development costs are then amortized on a product-by-product basis over the estimated product life of between one to two years and are included in the cost of software license revenue. Product development costs not meeting the requirements of capitalization are expensed as incurred. The Company’s product development utilizes a total quality management approach to software development and participates in a self-management process measurement using Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute’s Capability Maturity Model (self-assessment only).

     Product development expenses decreased to $1,326,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $1,537,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. These expenses represent 18% of total revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2004, as

18

compared to 22% of total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The decrease in product development expenses was due primarily to a reduction in product development salaries and benefits from those employees transferred in connection with the sale of the CRM Business in the first quarter of 2003. The Company anticipates that it will continue to devote substantial resources to the development of new products, new versions of its existing products including Applix TM1, Applix Integra and related applications.

General and Administrative Expenses

     General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits and occupancy costs for executive, administrative, finance, information technology and human resource personnel. General and administrative expenses also include legal costs associated with the Company’s investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission related to the Company’s financial restatements for the fiscal years 2001 and 2002. General and administrative expenses decreased $620,000, to $1,608,000, or 22% of total revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2004 from $2,228,000, or 33% of total revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The decrease was primarily due to lower executive severance costs, stock-based compensation expenses related to certain executive stock options and costs associated with the Company’s two financial restatements and related SEC investigation. The decrease was also attributable to a reduction in rent expense in the first quarter of 2004 resulting from the Company’s restructured headquarters’ lease. The Company will continue to closely monitor general and administrative costs.

Compensation Expenses and Amortization of Acquired Intangible Asset

     Compensation expenses and amortization of acquired intangibles consists primarily of contingent cash consideration relating to the Company’s March 2001 acquisition of Dynamic Decisions and the amortization of identified intangible assets, consisting of customer relationships, associated with the acquisition. For the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company recorded $0 and $583,000, respectively, for compensation expenses related to the acquisition of Dynamic Decisions, which includes the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations of translating the Australian dollar to the U.S. dollar. All contingent amounts relating to the Dynamic Decisions acquisition were paid in 2003 and no further amounts are due.

     Amortization expense for the customer relationships associated with the Dynamic Decisions acquisition was $63,000 for each of the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Non-Operating Income

Interest and Other Income, Net

     Interest and other income decreased to $147,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, as compared to interest and other income of $174,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The decrease is primarily due to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on intercompany balances denominated in the Company’s foreign subsidiaries’ local currencies.

Net Gain from Sale of CRM Business

     In the first quarter of 2003, the Company completed the sale of the CRM Business to iET Acquisition, LLC (“iET”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Platinum Equity Holdings, LLC for $5,750,000 in cash consideration, of which $487,000 was paid to iET for net working capital adjustments and $3,552,000 in net assumed liabilities. The sale excluded approximately $2,800,000 in net accounts receivable generated from the sale of CRM products and services.

     iET paid $4,250,000 of the purchase price in cash at the initial closing and paid an additional $1,500,000 in cash on March 17, 2003 upon the completion of the closing of certain assets of the Company’s Germany subsidiary, Applix GmbH. During the period of

19

the initial closing and completion of the Company’s Germany subsidiary closing, Applix GmbH continued to resell the CRM software products sold to iET, and to provide professional services and maintenance support under a reseller’s agreement between the Company and iET.

     The Company’s results for the three months ended March 31, 2003 included CRM license revenues of $253,000 and CRM professional services and maintenance revenues of $999,000.

     In the first quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a net gain before tax of $8,000,000, which includes net cash consideration of $5,525,000, which reflects $262,000 paid back to iET, and $3,552,000 of net liabilities assumed by iET less transaction costs of $1,077,000. The purchase price is subject to certain post closing adjustments relating to the net working capital as set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement between the Company and iET, dated January 21, 2003.

     In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recorded an adjustment, a change in estimates, of $90,000 to reduce the net gain from the sale of the CRM Business and paid back an additional $225,000 to iET of the total cash consideration received due to post-closing adjustments.

Provision for Income Taxes

     The provision for income taxes represents the Company’s state and foreign income tax obligations and amortization of a deferred tax liability related to the Company’s acquisition of Dynamic Decisions. The Company’s provision for income taxes was $27,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to $649,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2003 includes $355,000 for U.S. (federal and state) and foreign income taxes related to the Company’s sale of its CRM Business including the sale of related U.S. and foreign assets and transferred assumed liabilities.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

     The Company derives its liquidity and capital resources primarily from the Company’s cash flow from operations and from working capital. In addition, for the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company sold $3 million of its common stock to a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, along with another investor, who is related to the Board member and increased its cash balance by $1.4 million from the issuance of the Company’s common stock under its stock plans. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents balances were $13,057,000 and $10,058,000 as of March 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively, which includes restricted cash of $400,000 and $817,000, respectively. The Company’s day’s sales outstanding (“DSO”) in accounts receivable was 58 days as of both March 31, 2004 and 2003.

     Cash used in the Company’s operating activities was $1,207,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, compared to cash used in operating activities of $2,461,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. Cash used in the Company’s operating activities was affected by a decrease in operating assets of $1,430,000 and a decrease in operating liabilities of $3,809,000. The decrease in operating liabilities reflects a $3,096,000 change in accrued restructuring expenses from payments made in the three months ended March 31, 2004.

     Cash used in investing activities totaled $25,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 compared to cash provided by investing activities of $5,488,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003. The decrease in cash provided by investing activities is primarily a result of the net cash proceeds of $5,525,000 from the sale of the CRM Business in the three months ended March 31, 2003.

     Cash provided by financing activities totaled $4,587,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, which consisted of proceeds of $3,000,000 from the sale of common stock to two investors described above, $1,355,000 from issuance of stock under the Company’s stock plans and $232,000 from the repayment of notes receivable. This compares to total cash used in financing activities of $18,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2003.

     Cash paid for income taxes by the Company of $108,000 and $62,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase in cash was primarily due an increase in foreign income taxes paid by the Company’s foreign subsidiaries.

     In January 2004, the Company entered into a lease amendment of its original lease with its landlord for its Westborough, MA headquarters. The amendment required the payment of a $3,000,000 restructuring fee to the landlord, which was paid on January 22, 2004. Per terms of the amendment, the original lease was amended as follows: 1) a reduction in the amount of space leased from

20

49,960 square feet to 24,376 square feet, 2) a reduction in annual rental payments from approximately $1,400,000 to $550,000, 3) a reduction in the remaining term of the lease from 9 3/4 years to 7 years, and 4) a reduction of the amount of the required irrevocable standby letter of credit from $817,000 to $400,000. The payment required pursuant to the release of excess space was expensed in 2003 as part of the accrued restructuring expenses.

     In February 2004, a member of the Company’s board of directors, along with another investor, who is related to the Board member, purchased 657,894 shares of common stock from the Company for $3 million.

     On March 19, 2004, the Company entered into two credit facilities, providing for loans, with Silicon Valley Bank (“SVB”). The first facility, a domestic working capital line of credit, has an interest rate of prime plus 1.00% per annum and provides for borrowings of up to the lesser of (i) $2,000,000 or (ii) an amount based upon a percentage of the Company’s qualifying domestic accounts receivable. The second facility, an equipment line of credit, has an interest rate of prime plus 1.50% per annum and provides for borrowings of up to $1,000,000. The obligations of the Company to SVB are guaranteed by the Company and certain of its domestic subsidiaries and are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and such domestic subsidiaries. The facilities will expire on March 18, 2005. As of March 31, 2004, there were no amounts outstanding under these two credit facilities.

     As of March 31, 2004, the Company had the following future cash commitments, which includes the net effects of the Company’s amended Westborough, Massachusetts headquarters’ lease, for the cash payments pertaining to its contractual obligations.

     The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or related parties, and as such, the Company’s liquidity and capital resources are not subject to off-balance-sheet risks from unconsolidated entities.

     The Company has plans for approximately $475,000 in capital expenditures for the remainder of 2004, including hardware, software, upgrades and replacements. The Company may finance these purchases through use of third-party financing arrangements including its equipment line of credit.

     For the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company achieved operating profitability and generated positive cash flow. The Company has, however, historically incurred operating losses and negative cash flows for the last several years. As of March 31, 2004, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $44.6 million. Management’s plans include increasing revenues and generating positive cash flows from operations. The Company currently expects that the principal sources of funding for its operating expenses, capital expenditures and other liquidity needs will be a combination of its available cash balances, funds expected to be generated from operations, and the two SVB credit facilities. The availability of borrowings under the Company’s two credit facilities are subject to the maintenance of certain financial covenants. The Company’s working capital line of credit is also limited to the lesser of (i) $2 million or (ii) an amount based upon a percentage of the Company’s qualifying domestic accounts receivable. The Company believes that its currently available sources of funds will be sufficient to fund its operations for at least the next 12 months. However, there are a number of factors that may negatively impact the Company’s available sources of funds. The amount of cash generated from or used by operations will be dependent upon such factors as the successful execution of the Company’s business plan, including increasing revenues and reinvesting into its sales and marketing and field operations. If the Company does not meet its plans to generate sufficient revenue or positive cash flows, it may need to raise additional capital or reduce spending.

21

FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS

		OUR STOCK PRICE MAY BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED BY SIGNIFICANT FLUCTUATIONS IN OUR QUARTERLY RESULTS.

     We may experience significant fluctuations in our future results of operations due to a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control, including:

•		demand for and market acceptance of our products and services;
•		the size and timing of customer orders, particularly large orders, some of which represent more than 10% of total revenue during a particular quarter;
•		introduction of products and services or enhancements by us and our competitors;
•		competitive factors that affect our pricing;
•		the mix of products and services we sell;
•		the hiring and retention of key personnel;
•		our expansion into international markets;
•		the timing and magnitude of our capital expenditures, including costs relating to the expansion of our operations;
•		the acquisition and retention of key partners;
•		changes in generally accepted accounting policies, especially those related to the recognition of software revenue; and
•		new government legislation or regulation.

     We typically receive a majority of our orders in the last month of each fiscal quarter because our customers often delay purchases of products until the end of the quarter as our sales organization and our individual sales representatives strive to meet quarterly sales targets. As a result, any delay in anticipated sales is likely to result in the deferral of the associated revenue beyond the end of a particular quarter, which would have a significant effect on our operating results for that quarter. In addition, most of our operating expenses do not vary directly with net sales and are difficult to adjust in the short term. As a result, if net sales for a particular quarter were below expectations, we could not proportionately reduce operating expenses for that quarter, and, therefore, that revenue shortfall would have a disproportionate adverse effect on our operating results for that quarter. If our operating results are below the expectations of public market analysts and investors, the price of our common stock may fall significantly.

		OUR FUTURE SUCCESS IS DEPENDENT IN LARGE PART ON THE SUCCESS OF OUR CURRENT PRODUCTS.

     We have devoted a substantial amount of resources to the development and marketing of our current products. We believe that our future financial performance will be dependent in large part on the success of our ability to market our BI and BPM solutions.

		WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO FULFILL ANY FUTURE CAPITAL NEEDS.

     We achieved operating profitability for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and generated positive cash flow for the three months ended March 31, 2004. The Company has, however, historically incurred losses from continuing operations for the last several years. Additionally, we could incur operating losses and negative cash flows in the future because of costs and expenses relating to brand development, marketing and other promotional activities, continued development of our information technology infrastructure, expansion of product offerings and development of relationships with other businesses. Although we achieved profitability in the first quarter of 2004, there can be no assurance that we will achieve a profitable level of operations in the future.

22

     We believe, based upon our current business plan, that our current cash and cash equivalents, funds expected to be generated from operations and available credit lines should be sufficient to fund our operations as planned for at least the next twelve months. However, we may need additional funds sooner than anticipated if our performance deviates significantly from our current business plan or if there are significant changes in competitive or other market factors. If we elect to raise additional operating funds, such funds, whether from equity or debt financing or other sources, may not be available, or available on terms acceptable to us.

		IF WE DO NOT INTRODUCE NEW PRODUCTS AND SERVICES IN A TIMELY MANNER, OUR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES WILL BECOME OBSOLETE, AND OUR OPERATING RESULTS WILL SUFFER.

     The business performance management and business intelligence markets, including in interactive planning, budgeting and analytics are characterized by rapid technological change, frequent new product enhancements, uncertain product life cycles, changes in customer demands and evolving industry standards. Our products could be rendered obsolete if products based on new technologies are introduced or new industry standards emerge.

     Enterprise computing environments are inherently complex. As a result, we cannot accurately estimate the life cycles of our products. New products and product enhancements can require long development and testing periods, which requires us to hire and retain technically competent personnel. Significant delays in new product releases or significant problems in installing or implementing new products could seriously damage our business. We have, on occasion, experienced delays in the scheduled introduction of new and enhanced products and may experience similar delays in the future.

     Our future success depends upon our ability to enhance existing products, develop and introduce new products, satisfy customer requirements and achieve market acceptance. We may not successfully identify new product opportunities and develop and bring new products to market in a timely and cost-effective manner.

		ATTEMPTS TO EXPAND BY MEANS OF BUSINESS COMBINATIONS AND ACQUISITIONS MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL AND MAY DISRUPT OUR OPERATIONS OR HARM OUR REVENUES.

     We have in the past, and may in the future, buy businesses, products or technologies. In the event of any future purchases, we will face additional financial and operational risks, including:

•		difficulty in assimilating the operations, technology and personnel of acquired companies;
•		disruption in our business because of the allocation of resources to consummate these transactions and the diversion of management’s attention from our core business;
•		difficulty in retaining key technical and managerial personnel from acquired companies;
•		dilution of our stockholders, if we issue equity to fund these transactions;
•		assumption of increased expenses and liabilities;
•		our relationships with existing employees, customers and business partners may be weakened or terminated as a result of these transactions; and
•		additional ongoing expenses associated with write-downs of goodwill and other purchased intangible assets.

		WE RELY HEAVILY ON KEY PERSONNEL.

     The loss of any of our members of management, or any of our staff of sales and development professionals, could prevent us from successfully executing our business strategies. Any such loss of technical knowledge and industry expertise could negatively impact our success. Moreover, the loss of any critical employees or a group thereof, particularly to a competing organization, could cause us to lose market share, and the Applix brand could be diminished.

		WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO MEET THE OPERATIONAL AND FINANCIAL CHALLENGES THAT WE ENCOUNTER IN OUR INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS.

23

     Due to the Company’s significant international operations, we face a number of additional challenges associated with the conduct of business overseas. For example:

•		we may have difficulty managing and administering a globally-dispersed business;
•		fluctuations in exchange rates may negatively affect our operating results;
•		we may not be able to repatriate the earnings of our foreign operations;
•		we have to comply with a wide variety of foreign laws;
•		we may not be able to adequately protect our trademarks overseas due to the uncertainty of laws and enforcement in certain countries relating to the protection of intellectual property rights;
•		reductions in business activity during the summer months in Europe and certain other parts of the world could negatively impact the operating results of our foreign operations;
•		export controls could prevent us from shipping our products into and from some markets;
•		multiple and possibly overlapping tax structures could significantly reduce the financial performance of our foreign operations;
•		changes in import/export duties and quotas could affect the competitive pricing of our products and services and reduce our market share in some countries; and
•		economic or political instability in some international markets could result in the forfeiture of some foreign assets and the loss of sums spent developing and marketing those assets.

		BECAUSE THE BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE MARKETS ARE HIGHLY COMPETITIVE, WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCEED.

     If we fail to compete successfully in the highly competitive and rapidly changing business performance management and business intelligence markets, we may not be able to succeed. We face competition primarily from business intelligence firms. We also face competition from large enterprise application software vendors, independent systems integrators, consulting firms and in-house IT departments. Because barriers to entry into the software market are relatively low, we expect to face additional competition in the future.

     Many of our competitors can devote significantly more resources to the development, promotion and sale of products than we can, and many of them can respond to new technologies and changes in customer preferences more quickly than we can. Further, other companies with resources greater than ours may attempt to gain market share in the customer analytics and business planning markets by acquiring or forming strategic alliances with our competitors.

		BECAUSE WE DEPEND IN PART ON THIRD-PARTY SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS TO SELL OUR PRODUCTS, OUR OPERATING RESULTS WILL LIKELY SUFFER IF WE DO NOT DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN THESE RELATIONSHIPS.

     We rely in part on systems integrators to promote, sell and implement our solutions. If we fail to maintain and develop relationships with systems integrators, our operating results will likely suffer. In addition, if we are unable to rely on systems integrators to install and implement our products, we will likely have to provide these services ourselves, resulting in increased costs. As a result, our results of operation may be harmed. In addition, systems integrators may develop, market or recommend products that compete with our products. Further, if these systems integrators fail to implement our products successfully, our reputation may be harmed.

		BECAUSE THE SALES CYCLE FOR OUR PRODUCTS CAN BE LENGTHY, IT IS DIFFICULT FOR US TO PREDICT WHEN OR WHETHER A SALE WILL BE MADE.

     The timing of our revenue is difficult to predict in large part due to the length and variability of the sales cycle for our products. Companies often view the purchase of our products as a significant and strategic decision. As a result, companies tend to take

24

significant time and effort evaluating our products. The amount of time and effort depends in part on the size and the complexity of the deployment. This evaluation process frequently results in a lengthy sales cycle, typically ranging from three to six months. During this time we may incur substantial sales and marketing expenses and expend significant management efforts. We do not recoup these investments if the prospective customer does not ultimately license our product.

		OUR BUSINESS WILL BE HARMED IF WE ARE UNABLE TO PROTECT OUR TRADEMARKS FROM MISUSE BY THIRD PARTIES.

     Our collection of trademarks is important to our business. The protective steps we take or have taken may be inadequate to deter misappropriation of our trademark rights. We have filed applications for registration of some of our trademarks in the United States. Effective trademark protection may not be available in every country in which we offer or intend to offer our products and services. Failure to protect our trademark rights adequately could damage our brand identity and impair our ability to compete effectively. Furthermore, defending or enforcing our trademark rights could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.

OUR PRODUCTS MAY CONTAIN DEFECTS THAT MAY BE COSTLY TO CORRECT, DELAY MARKET ACCEPTANCE OF OUR PRODUCTS AND EXPOSE US TO LITIGATION.

     Despite testing by Applix and our customers, errors may be found in our products after commencement of commercial shipments. If errors are discovered, we may have to make significant expenditures of capital to eliminate them and yet may not be able to successfully correct them in a timely manner or at all. Errors and failures in our products could result in a loss of, or delay in, market acceptance of our products and could damage our reputation and our ability to convince commercial users of the benefits of our products.

     In addition, failures in our products could cause system failures for our customers who may assert warranty and other claims for substantial damages against us. Although our license agreements with our customers typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential product liability claims, it is possible that these provisions may not be effective or enforceable under the laws of some jurisdictions. Our insurance policies may not adequately limit our exposure to this type of claim. These claims, even if unsuccessful, could be costly and time-consuming to defend.

25

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     As a multinational corporation, the Company is exposed to market risk, primarily from changes in foreign exchange rates. These exposures may change over time and could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial results. Most of the Company’s international sales through its subsidiaries are denominated in foreign currencies. The Company’s exposure to changes in net income, due to foreign exchange rates fluctuations, in the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is mitigated to some extent by expenses incurred by the foreign subsidiary in the same currency. The Company’s primary foreign currency exposures relate to its short-term intercompany balances with its foreign subsidiaries. These foreign subsidiaries have functional currencies denominated in the Euro, Australian dollar, British pound and Swiss franc that are remeasured at each period end with any exchange gains or losses recorded in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Based on foreign currency exposures existing at March 31, 2004, a 10% unfavorable movement in foreign exchange rates related to the British pound, Euro, Australian dollar, and Swiss franc would result in approximately a $281,000 loss to earnings. The Company has currently not engaged in activities to hedge these exposures.

     At March 31, 2004, the Company held $13,057,000 in cash equivalents, including $400,000 of restricted cash, consisting primarily of money market funds and commercial paper with original maturities of three months or less. Cash equivalents are classified as available for sale and carried at fair value, which approximates cost. A hypothetical 10% increase in interest rates would not have a material impact on the fair market value of these instruments due to their short maturity and the Company’s intention that all the securities will be sold within one year.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

     The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of March 31, 2004. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of March 31, 2004, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were (1) designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report was being prepared and (2) effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

     No change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2004 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES, USE OF PROCEEDS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

     On February 27, 2004, the Company sold 328,947 shares of its common stock to Brad Fire, one of the Company’s directors, and 328,947 shares of its common stock to a relative of Mr. Fire. The total aggregate proceeds received by the Company was $3,000,000. The Company relied on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The purchasers represented to the Company that each has knowledge and experience in financial and business matters such that each purchaser was capable of evaluating the merits and risks of the investment in the Company’s common stock.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

     The Company granted a stock option for 50,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to David Mahoney, the Company’s chief executive officer, on March 10, 2003 at an exercise price of $1.40 pursuant to the Company’s 1994 Equity Incentive Plan. The stock option was granted to Mr. Mahoney upon the Company’s customary stock option terms. This information was inadvertently omitted from the Company’s proxy statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 12, 2004.

26

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Exhibits

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

1.		On February 5, 2004, the Company furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 12 containing the Company’s pres release relating to the Company’s financial results for the year ended December 31, 2003.
2.		On February 27, 2004, the Company filed Amendment No. 1 to Current Report on Form 8-K/A under Item 5 containing Amendment No. 1, dated as of February 27, 2004, to the Rights Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2000, between the Company and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent.

27

SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

28

EXHIBIT INDEX

29