Back to GetFilings.com



 



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

     
(Mark One)
   
þ
  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
 
or
 
o
  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
    For the transition period from             to

Commission File No. 1-10466

The St. Joe Company

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Florida
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  59-0432511
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
245 Riverside Avenue, Suite 500
Jacksonville, Florida
(Address of principal executive offices)
  32202
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (904) 301-4200

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

     
Title of Each Class Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered


Common Stock, no par value
  New York Stock Exchange

      Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     YES þ          NO o

      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.     o

      Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).     YES þ          NO o

      The aggregate market value of the registrant’s Common Stock held by non-affiliates based on the closing price on June 30, 2003 was approximately $1.52 billion.

      As of March 10, 2004, there were 101,170,081 shares of Common Stock, no par value, issued and 75,930,545 shares outstanding with 25,239,536 shares of treasury stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

      Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 18, 2004 (the “proxy statement”) are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Report. Other documents incorporated by reference in this Report are listed in the Exhibit Index.




 

 
Item 1. Business

      As used throughout this Form 10-K Annual Report, the terms “we,” “JOE,” “Company” and “Registrant” mean The St. Joe Company and its consolidated subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise.

      JOE is one of Florida’s largest real estate operating companies and the largest private landowner in the State of Florida. The majority of our land is located in Northwest Florida. We own approximately 850,000 acres, which is approximately 2.4% of the land area of the State of Florida. Our acreage includes hundreds of miles of frontage on the Gulf of Mexico, bays, rivers and waterways, with nearly 40 miles of Gulf of Mexico coastline, including 5 miles of beachfront. Approximately 387,000 acres of our land are within ten miles of the coast.

      We are engaged in community and resort development, commercial and industrial land sales, and commercial real estate services. We also have significant interests in timber. We believe we are one of the few real estate operating companies to have assembled the range of real estate, financial, marketing and regulatory expertise necessary to take a large-scale approach to real estate development and services.

      Our four operating segments are:

  •  Community Development
 
  •  Commercial Real Estate Development and Services
 
  •  Land Sales
 
  •  Forestry

      In order to optimize the value of our core real estate assets in Northwest Florida, our strategic plan calls for us to continue to reposition our timberland holdings for higher and better uses. We believe we have a number of key business strengths and competitive advantages, including one of the largest inventories of private land suitable for development in the State of Florida, a very low cost basis in our land and a strong financial condition, which allow us the financial flexibility to pursue development opportunities.

Recent Developments

      In 2003, our business experienced the following developments:

  •  Beginning in September, we converted to quarterly dividend distributions of $.12 per share. We paid a total of $0.32 per share in dividends for the year. We paid an annual dividend of $0.08 per share in 2000, 2001 and 2002.
 
  •  We acquired 3,367,976 shares of our common stock for a total of $102.9 million.
 
  •  The Alfred I. duPont Testamentary Trust (the “Trust”) sold an aggregate of 11 million shares to the public, decreasing the ownership of our common stock by the Trust and its beneficiary, The Nemours Foundation, to 31.5% on December 31, 2003.
 
  •  We acquired the 26% minority interest in St. Joe/ Arvida Company, L.P., and resolved claims regarding our ownership of the “Arvida” trademark.

      In February 2004:

  •  Our board of directors authorized an additional $150 million for stock repurchases. At December 31, 2003, $43.2 million remained of our prior stock repurchase authorization.
 
  •  The Trust sold an additional 6 million shares to the public, further decreasing the ownership of our common stock by the Trust and The Nemours Foundation to 23.6% at the closing of the offering on February 13, 2004.

1


 

Community Development

      Our Community Development segment develops large-scale, mixed-use communities primarily on land that we have owned for a long period of time. We own large tracts of land in Northwest Florida, including large tracts near Tallahassee, the state capital, and significant Gulf of Mexico beach frontage and waterfront properties, which we believe are suited for primary housing, resort and second-home communities. We believe this large, established land inventory, with a low cost basis, provides us an advantage over our competitors who must purchase real estate at current market prices before beginning projects. We manage the conceptual design, planning and permitting process for each of our new communities. We then construct or contract for the construction of the infrastructure for the community. Developed homesites and finished housing units are then marketed and sold.

      In addition, we own all of the outstanding stock of Saussy Burbank, a homebuilder located in Charlotte, North Carolina. In 2003, Saussy Burbank closed sales of 555 homes it constructed in North and South Carolina.

      The following table describes the primary residential or resort communities we are currently planning and developing in Florida. The expected build-out period for these communities ranges from 2004 to 2017 and the total acreage encompassed by these communities is approximately 17,700 acres. Most of the communities are on lands we own. We expect some of the communities to be developed through ventures with unrelated third parties. In addition to the properties listed in the table, we are developing in Florida the communities of Paseos, located in Palm Beach County, and Rivercrest, located in Hillsborough County, through joint ventures. These communities encompass approximately 207 and 413 acres, respectively, with build-out expected in 2006 and 2008, respectively.

Residential or Resort Communities Under Development

December 31, 2003
                                                                 
Unit***
Year Planned Sales as of Contracts on Approximate Company-
Sales Sales End Estimated Total December 31, Hand (not Acres in Built House
Name of Community Begin* Date Units Planned 2003 closed) Community Pricing Lot Pricing









(In thousands) (In thousands)
Walton County:
                                                               
WaterColor
    2000       2007       1140       717       85       499     $ 400-1000+     $ 150-1000+  
WaterSound Beach
    2001       2007       499       293       62       256     $ 500-1000+     $ 200-1000+  
WaterSound
    2005       2012       1060       0       0       1443     $ 325-600+     $ 100-265+  
East Lake Powell
    2007       2010       360 entitled       0       0       181     $ 400-600+     $ 100-200+  
Camp Creek Golf Club
    TBD **     TBD **     50       0       0       1028       TBD**       TBD**  
Bay County:
                                                               
Hammocks
    2000       2007       459       232       44       143     $ 100-180+     $ 30-40+  
Palmetto Trace
    2001       2008       523       192       61       138     $ 105-200+        
Wavecrest
    2005       2007       88       0       0       6       TBD**       TBD**  
Gulf County:
                                                               
WindMark Beach, phase 1
    2001       2006       110       100       0       80     $ 950     $ 90-900+  
WindMark Beach, phase 2
    2005       2015       1550       0       0       2000     $ 315-1,000+     $ 200-1,000+  
Capital Region:
                                                               
SouthWood
    2000       2017 *     4770 per DRI       588       116       3770     $ 115-400+     $ 40-150+  
SummerCamp
    2004       2012       499       0       0       782     $ 450-900+     $ 150-800+  

2


 

                                                                 
Unit***
Year Planned Sales as of Contracts on Approximate Company-
Sales Sales End Estimated Total December 31, Hand (not Acres in Built House
Name of Community Begin* Date Units Planned 2003 closed) Community Pricing Lot Pricing









(In thousands) (In thousands)
Jacksonville:
                                                               
James Island
    1999       2004       365       359       7       194     $ 220-400+          
St. Johns Golf and County Club
    2001       2006       799       519       88       820     $ 180-400+     $ 30-125+  
RiverTown
    2000       2015       4500       23       0       4200     $ 125-400+     $ 55-400+  
Hampton Park
    2001       2005       158       130       44       150     $ 235-400+        
Central Florida:
                                                               
Victoria Park
    2001       2012 +     Over 4000 per DRI       359       87       1859     $ 140-300+     $ 45-100+  
Artisan Park,
                                                               
Celebration
    2003       2008       616       57       47       160     $ 225-400+     $ 100-140+  
         
                 
Total
                                            17,709                  
         
                 


  *  Includes estimated future dates.
 
 **  To be determined.
 
***  Units are comprised of lots and single-family and multi-family residences.

      The following is a more detailed description of some of the above communities:

      WaterColor is situated on approximately 499 acres on the beaches of the Gulf of Mexico in south Walton County, Florida. All three phases of WaterColor have been approved under Florida’s Development of Regional Impact (“DRI”) permitting process as well as state and federal environmental permits. We are building homes and condominiums and selling developed homesites in WaterColor. At full build-out, the community is planned to include approximately 1,140 units, a beach club, tennis center, boat house, restaurant on an inland freshwater lake, and a 60-room inn and restaurant, commercial space and parks. Among the amenities now open are the beach club and several community pools, the boat house, a fitness center, the Fresh Daily Market, the tennis facility, the WaterColor Inn and Fish Out of Water restaurant. Infrastructure construction in phase three began in 2003 and is planned to include a community pool and a community center.

      WaterSound Beach is located approximately four miles east of WaterColor. Situated on approximately 256 acres, WaterSound Beach includes over one mile of beachfront on the Gulf of Mexico. This community is currently planned to include approximately 499 units. Eighty-one beachfront multi-family units were substantially completed in 2003.

      WaterSound is located east of WaterSound Beach with frontage on Lake Powell. This project is situated on approximately 1,440 acres. On October 7, 2003, the Walton County Board of Commissioners approved the Application for Planned Unit Development enabling development of 478 residential units along with 35,000 square feet of commercial space. Including the amount above, the plan for WaterSound calls for approximately 1,060 residential units, 470,000 square feet of commercial space and a golf course. The DRI process for that project commenced in early 2003 and is expected to continue through 2004.

      Camp Creek Golf Club is located approximately four miles east of WaterColor and within one-half mile of WaterSound. Plans include 36 holes of golf. The first 18-hole golf course, designed by Tom Fazio, was opened for play in May 2001.

      East Lake Powell is situated on approximately 181 acres in Bay County, Florida. Preliminary design for the first phase of East Lake Powell calls for approximately 200 residential units.

      WindMark Beach is situated on approximately 2,000 acres in Gulf County, Florida, and includes approximately 15,000 feet of beachfront that we own. Phase I of WindMark Beach, situated on approximately 80 acres, includes approximately 110 homesites, many of which are located on the beachfront. Future phases are planned to include approximately 1,550 units. Significant progress on the

3


 

DRI process is expected by mid-2004. Plans also include the realignment of approximately four miles of US Highway 98. Field survey work and project engineering and design of the relocated road are ongoing.

      SouthWood is situated on approximately 3,770 acres in southeast Tallahassee, Florida. Plans for SouthWood include approximately 4,250 residential units and a traditional town center with restaurants, entertainment facilities, retail shops and offices. Over 35% of the land is designated for greenspaces, including a 123-acre central park. Certain regulatory approvals are required prior to commencing development on phases of construction that begin in the 2006-2007 timeframe. Two schools opened in SouthWood in the fall of 2001: Florida State Development Research School, a university laboratory school for grades K-12, and the Pope John Paul II Catholic Academy, a private parochial school for grades 9-12. In November 2002, the new Fred Couples designed 18 hole golf course opened for play.

      SummerCamp, in Franklin County, Florida, is situated on approximately 782 acres. Current plans include approximately 499 units, a beach club, a community dock and nature trails. Several regulatory steps remain before construction can commence.

      St. Johns Golf and Country Club is situated on approximately 820 acres acquired by the Company in St. Johns County, Florida, in 2001. The community is planned to include a total of approximately 799 housing units and an 18-hole golf course. Most homes will be adjacent to golf, conservation land, lakes, or natural wooded areas.

      RiverTown is situated on approximately 4,200 acres located in St. Johns County, Florida, south of Jacksonville along the St. Johns River. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment and DRI were approved for RiverTown by the St. Johns County Board of Commissioners in February 2004; a number of regulatory steps remain before construction can commence.

      Victoria Park is located in Volusia County in central Florida. Victoria Park is situated on approximately 1,859 acres being acquired by the Company near Interstate 4 in Deland, Florida between Daytona Beach and Orlando, Florida. Plans for Victoria Park include approximately 4,000 single and multi-family units with a traditional town center and an 18-hole golf course which is open for play.

      Artisan Park is located in Celebration, Florida near Orlando and is being developed through a joint venture in which we own 74%. The phase of the project we are developing is situated on approximately 160 acres which we acquired in 2002. Current plans include approximately 267 single-family units, 47 townhomes, and 302 condominiums as well as parks, trails, and a community clubhouse with a pool and educational and recreational programming.

      Several of our planned developments are in the midst of the entitlement process or are in the planning stage. We cannot assure you that:

  •  the necessary entitlements for development will be secured;
 
  •  any of our projects can be successfully developed, if at all; or
 
  •  our projects can be developed in a timely manner.

      It is not feasible to estimate project development costs until entitlements have been obtained. Large-scale development projects can require significant infrastructure development costs and may raise environmental issues that require mitigation.

      We own approximately 26% of the outstanding limited partnership interests in Arvida/ JMB Partners, L.P. (“Arvida/ JMB”). The partnership developed the master-planned community known as Weston located in Broward County, Florida. The final home in this project was delivered in the first half of 2003. The winding-up of the affairs of the partnership is expected to take two or more years. Based on current expectations, we do not anticipate any material future income or losses from our investment in Arvida/JMB.

4


 

Commercial Real Estate Development and Services

      Our Commercial Real Estate Development and Services segment develops and sells real estate for commercial purposes. We also own and manage office, industrial and retail properties throughout the southeastern United States. Through the Advantis business unit, we provide commercial real estate services, including brokerage, property management and construction management.

      Development & Sales. We focus on development in Northwest Florida because of our large land holdings along roadways and near or within business districts in the region. We also develop parcels within or near existing Community Development projects. For each new development, we direct the conceptual design, planning and permitting process and then contract for the construction of the horizontal infrastructure and any vertical building.

      We develop and sell properties focused on the following products:

  •  Retail properties
 
  •  Mutifamily parcels
 
  •  Office parks
 
  •  Commerce or small business parks

      Many of our projects are mixed-use in nature due to the large size of the land parcels that we own. The following table shows our mixed-use projects in the Northwest Florida region.

Mixed-Use Projects

December 31, 2003
                                 
Net Acres
Year Sales Saleable Sold/Under
Project Product Type Market Commence* Acres Contract






Beckrich Office Park
  Office   Bay County     2002       24       8  
Southwood Village
  Retail (grocery)   Leon County     2002       22       14  
East Lake Creek
  Retail/ Multifamily   Bay County     2003       159       45  
Highland Commons
  Retail/ Multifamily   Bay County     2003       111       14  
Pier Park
  Retail (mixed-use)   Bay County     2003       127       24  
Southwood Business Park
  Retail/ Office   Leon County     2003       16       3  
WaterColor Crossing
  Retail (grocery)   Walton County     2003       9       7  
Southwood Town Center
  Retail/ Office   Leon County     2005       5       0  
Topsail
  Retail/ Multifamily   Walton County     2005       105       0  
                     
     
 
Total
                    578       115  
                     
     
 


Includes estimated future dates.

5


 

      The table below summarizes the status of JOE commerce parks throughout Northwest Florida at December 31, 2003.

Commerce Parks

December 31, 2003
                               
Acres
Net Saleable Sold/Under Current Asking Price
Commerce Parks County Acres Contract Per Acre





Existing
                           
Beach Commerce
  Bay     161       69       $ 65,000 - 435,000  
Port St. Joe
  Gulf     58       43       $ 45,000 -  50,000  
Airport Commerce
  Leon     40             $ 75,000 - 260,000  
Nautilus Business Park
  Bay     12       1       $300,000 - 375,000  
Hammock Creek
  Gadsden     114       24       $ 40,000 - 150,000  
Predevelopment
                           
South Walton County
  Walton     42             $125,000 - 435,000  
Beach Commerce II
  Bay     140             $ 75,000 -  80,000  
Cedar Grove
  Bay     150             $ 35,000 -  45,000  
Port St. Joe II
  Gulf     45             $ 35,000 -  45,000  
Apalachicola Commerce
  Franklin     50             $ 30,000 -  35,000  
         
     
         
 
Total
        812       137          
         
     
         

6


 

      Investment/Development Portfolios. Our commercial development operations, combined with our tax deferral strategy of reinvesting qualifying asset sale proceeds into like-kind properties, have enabled us to create a portfolio of rental properties totaling 2.9 million square feet. As the table below shows, our portfolios of investment and development properties were 86% and 70% leased, respectively, based on net rentable square feet, as of December 31, 2003.

Commercial Rental Properties

December 31, 2003
                                               
Number Net
Investment Ownership of Rentable Leased
Property Portfolio* Dated Acquired Market Percentage Buildings Sq. Ft. Percentage







Prestige Place
    December-99     Clearwater, FL     100       2       144,000       86  
Harbourside
    December-99     Clearwater, FL     100       1       147,000       92  
Lakeview
    May-00     Tampa, FL     100       1       125,000       77  
Palm Court
    July-00     Tampa, FL     100       1       60,000       68  
Westside Corporate Center
    October-00     Plantation, FL     100       1       100,000       86  
280 Interstate North
    January-01     Atlanta, GA     100       1       126,000       71  
Southhall Center
    April-01     Orlando, FL     100       1       155,000       88  
1133 20th Street, N.W. 
    September-01     Washington, D.C.     100       1       119,000       99  
1750 K Street
    December-01     Washington, D.C.     100       1       152,000       90  
Millenia Park One
    December-99     Orlando, FL     100       1       158,000       68  
Beckrich Office One
    October-02     Panama City Beach, FL     100       1       34,000       96  
5660 New Northside
    December-02     Atlanta, GA     100       1       272,000       91  
SouthWood Office One
    June-03     Tallahassee, FL     100       1       88,000       73  
Crescent Ridge One
    August-03     Charlotte, NC     100       1       158,000       100  
Windward Plaza
    November-03     Atlanta, GA     100       3       465,000       89  
                         
     
     
 
 
Total
                        18       2,303,000       86%  
                         
     
     
 
                                               
Number Net
Development Ownership Of Rentable Leased
Property Portfolio* Date Completed Market Percentage Buildings Sq. Ft. Percentage







TNT Logistics
    February-02     Jacksonville, FL     100       1       99,000       83  
245 Riverside
    April-03     Jacksonville, FL     100       1       134,000       39  
Alliance Bank Building
    N/A     Orlando, FL     50       1       71,000       61  
Deerfield Commons One
    April-00     Atlanta, GA     40       1       122,000       77  
Westchase Corporate Center
    August-99     Houston, TX     93       1       184,000       94  
Beckrich Office Two
    November-03     Panama City Beach, FL     100       1       34,000       20  
                         
     
     
 
 
Total
                        6       644,000       70%  
                         
     
     
 


Investment properties are completed office buildings that we have acquired. Development properties are office buildings we have developed.

      Other Assets. We have investments in certain other assets including land positions that are held for investment and investments in real estate ventures. It is generally our intent to sell these assets over time

7


 

at market prices. The land positions total approximately 111 acres and are located in Florida, Georgia, Northern Virginia and Texas. Our investments in real estate ventures include investments in land and buildings located in Florida, Georgia and Texas and an investment in a full-service real estate company located in South Florida.

      Services. We provide commercial real estate services in the southeastern United States through Advantis. Advantis provides our clients with a complete array of services, including:

  •  brokerage;
 
  •  property management; and
 
  •  construction management.

      We provide property management services for projects owned by us and others. We generally receive a property management fee based on the gross rental revenues of a managed project or building or on a fixed-fee basis. The table below summarizes, by state and by type of property, the approximately 26.6 million rentable square feet of property we manage.

Properties Managed

December 31, 2003
         
Rentable
State Square Feet


Georgia
    1,768,485  
Washington, D.C
    271,086  
Virginia
    8,974,239  
Maryland
    2,936,832  
North Carolina
    3,238,393  
Florida
    9,419,296  
         
Rentable
Type of Property Square Feet


Office property
    13,699,735  
Industrial property
    5,538,336  
Retail property
    3,602,025  
Facilities management
    2,186,374  
Asset management
    1,416,439  
Residential property
    165,422  

Land Sales

      Our Land Sales segment markets parcels typically between one and 5,000 acres from a portion of our long-held timberlands in Northwest Florida. This land includes forests and meadowlands, some with frontage on rivers, lakes and bays. These parcels are being marketed as large secluded home sites as well as for plantations, ranches, farms, hunting and fishing preserves or for other recreational uses.

      In 2003, our Land Sales segment closed 166 transactions totaling 29,904 acres.

      We believe there is an opportunity to create additional value on more than 500,000 acres of our original timberland that is not included in our current development plans. This value creation results from market analysis, land use/zoning changes, and parceling of our land holdings. We have embarked upon a five-year program seeking additional entitlements and zoning improvements throughout our land holdings. These entitlements are intended to facilitate alternative uses of our property and to increase its per acre value. The vast majority of the holdings marketed by our Land Sales segment will continue to be managed as timberland until sold.

8


 

 
RiverCamps

      We recently introduced a new product called RiverCamps. These are planned developments in rustic settings, supplemented with amenities that may include docks, pools, tennis courts and community river houses. Most of the lots in these developments are expected to be located on or near waterfront property. The RiverCamps concept envisions homesites and high-quality finished cabins in low-density settings with access to various outdoor activities such as fishing, boating, hiking and horseback riding.

      The first of potentially several RiverCamp developments is RiverCamps on Crooked Creek, situated on approximately 1,490 acres of our timberland in western Bay County, Florida and bounded by West Bay, the Intracoastal Waterway and Crooked Creek. In the fourth quarter of 2003, contracts for all 23 home sites of the first release at RiverCamps on Crooked Creek closed at an average price of $150,000. Future releases of home sites for sale are expected in 2004.

      Planning and evaluation of a 7,200-acre parcel located on Sandy Creek in Bay County, Florida is underway. The HGTV 2003 Dream Home, a RiverCamp concept home, is located across the bay from this parcel.

      Additional RiverCamps locations are actively being reviewed in other parts of Northwest Florida.

 
Ranches

      Work continued in 2003 on the launch of St. Joe Ranches, a new real estate product designed to transform what were once timberlands to higher and better uses. Ranches are for customers who want to own 10 to 150 acres, with controls on how the property around them is used. This product is initially being planned in rural settings in Leon, Wakulla and Gadsden Counties. These sites will benefit from proximity to Tallahassee and the agricultural and recreational nature of adjoining properties.

      Project improvements may generally include clearing, fencing, road stabilization and entry features. Each ranch product is to be sold with common restrictions designed to promote a sense of community as each owner finishes their property. Additional land management services will be available to ranch owners on a separate fee basis. Prices of individual tracts are expected to vary depending on the physical attributes of each site, including timber stands, topography and proximity to rivers, creeks and bays.

 
Conservation Lands

      Our Land Sales segment also sells land to conservation groups and governmental agencies. These sales commenced in 1999 and are expected to be completed in 2007. In 2003, we closed seven conservation land transactions, totaling 34,999 acres.

Forestry

      Our Forestry segment focuses on the management and harvesting of our extensive timberland holdings. We grow, harvest and sell timber and wood fiber. We are the largest private holder of timberlands in Florida, owning:

  •  Approximately 529,250 acres of planted pine forests, primarily in Northwest Florida.
 
  •  Approximately 306,462 acres of mixed timberland, wetlands, lake and canal properties.

      Our principal forestry product is softwood pulpwood. We also grow and sell softwood and hardwood sawtimber. On December 31, 2003, our standing pine inventory totaled 23 million tons and our hardwood inventory totaled 6.75 million tons. Our timberlands are harvested by local independent contractors under agreements that are generally renewed annually. Our timberlands are located near key transportation links, including roads, waterways and railroads.

      Our strategy is to actively manage, with the best available silviculture practices, portions of our timberlands that produce adequate amounts of timber to meet our pulpwood supply agreement obligation with Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation, which expires June 30, 2012. We also harvest and sell

9


 

additional timber to regional sawmills that produce products other than pulpwood. In addition, our forestry operation is focused on selective harvesting, thinning, and site preparation of timberlands that may later be sold or developed by other JOE divisions.

      As part of our strategy to maximize the cash flows from our forestry operations, we engage in several business activities complementary to our land holdings. In particular, we lease approximately 675,000 acres of our timberlands to private clubs and state agencies for hunting.

Risk Factors

      Our business faces numerous risks, including those set forth below. If any of the following risks and uncertainties develop into actual events, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. The risks described below are not the only ones we face. Additional risks not presently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations.

 
A downturn in economic conditions could adversely affect our business.

      Our ability to generate revenues is directly related to the real estate market, primarily in Florida, and to the national and local economy in general. Considerable economic and political uncertainties currently exist that could have adverse effects on consumer buying habits, construction costs, availability of labor and materials and other factors affecting us and the real estate industry in general.

      Significant expenditures associated with investment in real estate, such as real estate taxes, maintenance costs and debt payments, cannot generally be reduced if changes in Florida’s or the nation’s economy cause a decrease in revenues from our properties. In particular, if the growth rate for the Florida economy declines or if a recession in the Florida economy occurs, our profitability could be materially adversely affected.

      While real estate market conditions have generally remained healthy in our regions of development, particularly in Northwest Florida, continued demand for our services and products is dependent on long term prospects for job growth and strong in-migration population expansion in our regions of development.

      Over the last several years, investors have increasingly utilized real estate as an investment. Florida resort real estate has particularly benefited from this trend, creating demand, in addition to that described above, for our products. If this trend were to lessen, the demand for our products could decline, potentially impacting selling prices and/or absorption rates.

 
Our businesses are primarily concentrated in the State of Florida. As a result, our financial results are dependent on the economic growth and health of Florida, particularly Northwest Florida. The occurrence of natural disasters in Florida could also adversely affect our business.

      The economic growth and health of the State of Florida, particularly Northwest Florida where the majority of our land is located, are important factors in sustaining demand for our products and services. As a result, any adverse change to the economic growth and health of Florida, particularly Northwest Florida, could materially adversely affect our financial results. The future economic growth in certain portions of Northwest Florida may be adversely affected if its infrastructure, such as roads, airports, medical facilities and schools, are not improved to meet increased demand. There can be no assurance that these improvements will occur.

      The occurrence of natural disasters in Florida, such as fires, hurricanes, floods, unusually heavy or prolonged rain and droughts, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to develop and sell properties or realize income from our projects.

10


 

 
Increases in interest rates could reduce demand for our products.

      An increase in interest rates could reduce the demand for homes we build, particularly primary housing, lots we develop, commercial properties we develop or sell, and land we sell. A reduction in demand could materially adversely affect our profitability.

 
Our real estate operations are cyclical.

      Our business is affected by demographic and economic trends and the supply and rate of absorption of lot sales and new construction. As a result, our real estate operations are cyclical which may cause our quarterly revenues and operating results to fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and to differ from the expectations of public market analysts and investors. If this occurs, our stock’s trading price could also fluctuate significantly.

 
We are exposed to risks associated with real estate sales and development.

      Our real estate development activities entail risks that include:

  •  construction delays or cost overruns, which may increase project development costs;
 
  •  compliance with building codes and other local regulations;
 
  •  evolving liability theories affecting the construction industry;
 
  •  an inability to obtain required governmental permits and authorizations;
 
  •  an inability to secure tenants or anchors necessary to support commercial projects;
 
  •  failure to achieve anticipated occupancy levels or rents; and
 
  •  an inability to sell our constructed inventory.

      In addition, our real estate development activities require significant capital expenditures. We obtain funds for our capital expenditures through cash flow from operations, property sales or financings. We cannot be sure that the funds available from these sources will be sufficient to fund our required or desired capital expenditures for development. If we are unable to obtain sufficient funds, we may have to defer or otherwise limit our development activities. Our residential projects require significant capital expenditures for infrastructure development before we can begin our selling efforts. If we are unsuccessful in our selling efforts, we may not be able to recover these capital expenditures. Also, our ability to continue to make conservation land sales to government agencies depends on the agencies having sufficient funds available to purchase the lands.

 
Our business is subject to extensive regulation which makes it difficult and expensive for us to conduct our operations.
 
Development of real estate entails a lengthy, uncertain and costly approval process.

      Development of real property in Florida entails an extensive approval process involving overlapping regulatory jurisdictions. Real estate projects must generally comply with the provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act (the “Growth Management Act”). In addition, development projects that exceed certain specified regulatory thresholds require approval of a comprehensive Development of Regional Impact, or DRI, application. Compliance with the Growth Management Act and the DRI process is usually lengthy and costly and can be expected to materially affect our real estate development activities.

      The Growth Management Act requires counties and cities to adopt comprehensive plans guiding and controlling future real property development in their respective jurisdictions. After a local government adopts its comprehensive plan, all development orders and development permits must be consistent with the plan. Each plan must address such topics as future land use, capital improvements, traffic circulation, sanitation, sewerage, potable water, drainage and solid waste disposal. The local governments’

11


 

comprehensive plans must also establish “levels of service” with respect to certain specified public facilities and services to residents. Local governments are prohibited from issuing development orders or permits if facilities and services are not operating at established levels of service, or if the projects for which permits are requested will reduce the level of service for public facilities below the level of service established in the local government’s comprehensive plan. If the proposed development would reduce the established level of services below the level set by the plan, the development order will require that, at the outset of the project, the developer either sufficiently improve the services to meet the required level or provide financial assurances that the additional services will be provided as the project progresses.

      The Growth Management Act, in some instances, can significantly affect the ability of developers to obtain local government approval in Florida. In many areas, infrastructure funding has not kept pace with growth. As a result, substandard facilities and services can delay or prevent the issuance of permits. Consequently, the Growth Management Act could adversely affect our ability to develop our real estate projects.

      The DRI review process includes an evaluation of a project’s impact on the environment, infrastructure and government services, and requires the involvement of numerous state and local environmental, zoning and community development agencies. Local government approval of any DRI is subject to appeal to the Governor and Cabinet by the Florida Department of Community Affairs, and adverse decisions by the Governor or Cabinet are subject to judicial appeal. The DRI approval process is usually lengthy and costly, and conditions, standards or requirements may be imposed on a developer with respect to a particular project, which may materially increase the cost of the project. The DRI approval process is expected to have a material impact on our real estate development activities in the future.

 
Environmental and other regulations may have an adverse effect on our business.

      A substantial portion of our development properties in Florida is subject to federal, state and local regulations and restrictions that may impose significant limitations on our ability to develop them. Much of our property is raw land located in areas where development may affect the natural habitats of various endangered or protected wildlife species or in sensitive environmental areas such as wetlands and coastal areas.

      In addition, our current or past ownership, operation and leasing of real property, and our current or past transportation and other operations are subject to extensive and evolving federal, state and local environmental laws and other regulations. The provisions and enforcement of these environmental laws and regulations may become more stringent in the future. Violations of these laws and regulations can result in:

  •  civil penalties;
 
  •  remediation expenses;
 
  •  natural resource damages;
 
  •  personal injury damages;
 
  •  potential injunctions;
 
  •  cease and desist orders; and
 
  •  criminal penalties.

      In addition, some of these environmental laws impose strict liability, which means that we may be held liable for any environmental damages on our property regardless of fault.

      Some of our past and present real property, particularly properties used in connection with our previous transportation and papermill operations, involve the storage, use or disposal of hazardous substances that have contaminated and may in the future contaminate the environment. We may bear liability for this contamination and for the costs of cleaning up a site at which we have disposed of or to

12


 

which we have transported hazardous substances. The presence of hazardous substances on a property may also adversely affect our ability to sell or develop the property or to borrow using the property as collateral.

      Changes in laws or the interpretation thereof, new enforcement of laws, the identification of new facts or the failure of other parties to perform remediation at our current or former facilities could all lead to new or greater liabilities that could materially adversely affect our business, profitability, or financial condition.

 
Our joint venture partners may have interests that differ from ours and may take actions that adversely affect us.

      We are involved in joint venture relationships and may initiate future joint venture projects as part of our overall development strategy. A joint venture involves special risks such as:

  •  we may not have voting control over the joint venture;
 
  •  the venture partner at any time may have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with ours;
 
  •  the venture partner may take actions contrary to our instructions or requests, or contrary to our policies or objectives with respect to the real estate investments; and
 
  •  the venture partner could experience financial difficulties.

      Actions by our venture partners may subject property owned by the joint venture to liabilities greater than those contemplated by the joint venture agreement or have other adverse consequences.

 
Changes in our income tax estimates could affect our profitability.

      In preparing our consolidated financial statements, significant management judgment is required to estimate our income taxes. Our estimates are based on our interpretation of federal and state tax laws. We estimate our actual current tax due and assess temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet. Adjustments may be required by a change in assessment of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes due to audit adjustments by federal and state tax authorities, and changes in tax laws. To the extent adjustments are required in any given period, we would include the adjustments in the tax provision in our statement of operations and/or balance sheet. These adjustments could materially impact our financial position and results of operation.

 
Significant competition could have an adverse effect on our business.
 
The real estate industry is generally characterized by significant competition.

      A number of residential and commercial developers and real estate services companies, some with greater financial and other resources, compete with us in seeking properties for acquisition, resources for development and prospective purchasers and tenants. Competition from other real estate developers and real estate services companies may adversely affect our ability to:

  •  sell homes and homesites;
 
  •  attract purchasers;
 
  •  attract and retain tenants;
 
  •  sell undeveloped rural land; and
 
  •  sell our commercial services.

13


 

 
The forest products industry is highly competitive.

      Many of our competitors in the forest products industry are fully integrated companies with substantially greater financial and operating resources. Our products are also subject to increasing competition from a variety of non-wood and engineered wood products. In addition, we are subject to competition from lumber products and logs imported from foreign sources. Any significant increase in competitive pressures from substitute products or other domestic or foreign suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our forestry operations.

 
We are highly dependent on our senior management.

      Our senior management has been responsible for our transformation from an industrial conglomerate to a successful real estate operating company. Our future success is highly dependent upon the continued employment of our senior management. The loss of one or more of our senior managers could have a material adverse effect on our business. In August 2003, we entered into five-year employment agreements with Peter Rummell, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Kevin Twomey, our President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer. We do not have key-person life insurance on any of our senior managers.

 
Decline in rental income could adversely affect our financial results.

      We own a large portfolio of commercial real estate rental properties. Our profitability could be adversely affected if:

  •  a significant number of our tenants are unable to meet their obligations to us;
 
  •  we are unable to lease space at our properties when the space becomes available; and
 
  •  the rental rates upon a renewal or a new lease are significantly lower than expected.

 
The Trust and The Nemours Foundation own a large percentage of our stock and their interests may not always be identical to those of our public shareholders.

      As of March 1, 2004, the Alfred I. duPont Testamentary Trust and its beneficiary, The Nemours Foundation, together owned 17,870,965 shares, or approximately 24%, of our outstanding common stock. In addition, three of our current directors are trustees of the Trust. Under the terms of our registration rights agreement with the Trust, the Trust is entitled to nominate two members of our board of directors so long as the Trust beneficially owns at least 20% of our common stock. If the Trust beneficially owns less than 20% but at least 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock, the Trust will be entitled to nominate one member of our board. Accordingly, the Trust will continue to be able to have significant influence over our corporate and management policies, including decisions relating to mergers, acquisitions, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets and other significant transactions. The interests of the Trust may not be aligned with our interests or the interests of other shareholders.

 
Future sales or the perception of future sales by the Trust may affect the price of our common stock.

      We cannot predict the effect, if any, that future sales of shares by the Trust, or the availability of shares for future sale, will have on the market price of our common stock. Sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market or the perception that such sales may occur could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Forward-looking Statements

      This Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements, which are statements that are not historical facts. We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions about

14


 

our business, including the risk factors identified above, those described from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the following:

  •  economic conditions, particularly in Florida and key southeastern United States areas that serve as feeder markets to our Northwest Florida operations;
 
  •  acts of war or terrorism and other geopolitical events;
 
  •  local conditions such as an oversupply of homes and homesites, residential or resort properties, or a reduction in demand for real estate in the area;
 
  •  timing and costs associated with property developments and rentals;
 
  •  competition from other real estate developers;
 
  •  whether potential residents or tenants consider our properties attractive;
 
  •  increases in operating costs, including increases in real estate taxes;
 
  •  changes in the amount or timing of federal and state income tax liabilities resulting from either a change in our application of tax laws, an adverse determination by a taxing authority or court, or legislative changes to existing laws;
 
  •  how well we manage our properties;
 
  •  changes in interest rates and the performance of the financial markets;
 
  •  decreases in market rental rates for our commercial and resort properties;
 
  •  the pace of development of infrastructure in Northwest Florida;
 
  •  potential liability under environmental laws or other laws or regulations;
 
  •  adverse changes in laws or regulations affecting the development of real estate;
 
  •  decreases in prices of wood products;
 
  •  the availability of funding from governmental agencies and others to purchase conservation lands;
 
  •  fluctuations in the size and number of transactions from period to period; and
 
  •  adverse weather conditions or natural disasters.

      We have no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or risks. New information, future events or risks may cause the forward-looking events we discuss in this Form 10-K not to occur.

Employees

      We had approximately 1,478 full-time employees and 115 part-time employees at December 31, 2003. We consider our relations with our employees to be good. These employees work in the following segments:

         
Community development
    920  
Commercial real estate development and services
    528  
Land sales
    41  
Forestry
    32  
Other — including corporate
    72  

Website Access to Reports

      We will make available, free of charge, access to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports as soon as

15


 

reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC, through our home page at www.JOE.com.
 
Item 2. Properties

      We own our principal executive office located in Jacksonville, Florida. The majority of our other administrative offices are leased.

      We own approximately 850,000 acres, the majority of which are located in Northwest Florida, including substantial gulf, lake and riverfront acreage. Most of our raw land assets are managed as timberland until designated for development. For more information on our real estate assets, see Item 1. Business.

 
Item 3. Legal Proceedings

      We are involved in litigation on a number of matters and are subject to certain claims which arise in the normal course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. However, the aggregate amount being sought by the claimants in these matters is presently estimated to be several million dollars.

      We have retained certain self-insurance risks with respect to losses for third-party liability, worker’s compensation, property damage, group health insurance provided to employees and other types of insurance.

      We are subject to costs arising out of environmental laws and regulations, which include obligations to remove or limit the effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain wastes or substances at various sites including sites which have been previously sold. It is our policy to accrue and charge against earnings environmental cleanup costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. As assessments and cleanups proceed, these accruals are reviewed and adjusted, if necessary, as additional information becomes available.

      Pursuant to the terms of various agreements by which we disposed of our sugar assets in 1999, we are obligated to complete certain defined environmental remediation. Approximately $5.0 million of the sales proceeds are being held in escrow pending the completion of the remediation. We have separately funded the costs of remediation. Remediation was substantially completed in 2003. We expect the amounts held in escrow to be released to us during the second half of 2004.

      During the fourth quarter of 2000, management became aware of an investigation being conducted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) of our former paper mill site and some adjacent real property north of the paper mill site in Gulf County, Florida (the “Mill Site”). The real property on which our former paper mill is located was sold to the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation (“Smurfit”) and we retained ownership of the adjacent real property. In January 2004, we entered into a joint venture with Smurfit; this joint venture now owns the site of our former paper mill.

      The DEP submitted a Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) Site Discovery/ Prescreening Evaluation to Region IV of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“USEPA”) in Atlanta in September 2000. Based on this submission, the USEPA included the Mill Site on the CERCLIS List. The CERCLIS List is a list of sites which are to be evaluated to determine whether there is a potential presence of actionable contaminants.

      Based on its assessment of data obtained from voluntary testing performed by us and Smurfit, the DEP submitted a proposed Consent Order that we and Smurfit have executed. It obligates us to conduct further assessment of that portion of the Mill Site owned by us at that time and, if necessary, to rehabilitate that portion of the Mill Site. Smurfit has a corresponding obligation with respect to its portion of the Mill Site.

16


 

      Through incorporation of the data and findings which resulted from our voluntary testing, the DEP has completed and submitted a preliminary assessment/site investigation report to the USEPA, including a recommendation that the Mill Site be considered “low priority” under CERCLA. Based on this recommendation, the USEPA has deferred further action on the Mill Site and has agreed to allow the Mill Site to be assessed and rehabilitated, if necessary, under the guidance of the DEP.

      On November 5, 2002, the Mill Site was designated as a Brownfields Redevelopment Area for site rehabilitation under the provisions of applicable Florida law. Florida’s Brownfields program provides economic and tax incentives which may be available to us. We entered into a Brownfield Site Rehabilitation Agreement for the Mill Site that obligates us to conduct further assessment of our portion of the Mill Site to delineate the extent of contamination, if any, and, if necessary, to rehabilitate that portion. The Consent Order will be held in abeyance pending the completion of the assessment and remediation, if any, of the Mill Site under the terms of the Brownfield Site Remediation Agreement.

      Based on this current information, including the environmental test results, the recommendation for “low priority” USEPA consideration, the USEPA agreement to defer further action, and the Brownfields Area local designation, management does not believe our liability, if any, for the possible cleanup of any potential contaminants detected on the Mill Site will be material.

      We are currently a party to, or involved in, legal proceedings directed at the cleanup of Superfund sites. We have accrued an allocated share of the total estimated cleanup costs for these sites. Based upon management’s evaluation of the other potentially responsible parties, we do not expect to incur material additional amounts even though we have joint and several liability. Other proceedings involving environmental matters such as alleged discharge of oil or waste material into water or soil are pending against us. It is not possible to quantify future environmental costs because many issues relate to actions by third parties or changes in environmental regulation. However, based on information presently available, management believes that the ultimate disposition of currently known matters will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Environmental liabilities are paid over an extended period and the timing of such payments cannot be predicted with any confidence.

 
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

      None.

17


 

PART II

 
Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters

      We had approximately 42,000 beneficial owners of our common stock as of March 10, 2004. Our common stock is quoted on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) Composite Transactions Tape under the symbol “JOE.”

      The range of high and low prices for our common stock as reported on the NYSE Composite Transactions Tape for the periods indicated is set forth below:

                   
Common
Stock Price

High Low


2003
               
 
First Quarter
  $ 30.74     $ 26.19  
 
Second Quarter
    31.58       27.04  
 
Third Quarter
    35.01       31.01  
 
Fourth Quarter
    38.60       32.05  
2002
               
 
First Quarter
    30.00       27.20  
 
Second Quarter
    33.74       29.10  
 
Third Quarter
    30.85       24.35  
 
Fourth Quarter
    30.19       24.69  

      On March 10, 2004, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE was $40.40.

Dividends

      In September 2003, we initiated the payment of quarterly dividends to holders of our common stock at the rate of $.12 per share. We paid an aggregate of $.32 per share in dividends in 2003. In 2002 and 2001, we paid annual cash dividends of $0.08 per share.

18


 

 
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data

      The selected consolidated financial data set forth below are qualified in their entirety by and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere herein. The statement of operations data with respect to the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 have been derived from the financial statements of the Company included herein, which have been audited by KPMG LLP. The statement of operations data with respect to the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the balance sheet data as of December 31, 2001, 2000, and 1999 have been derived from the financial statements of the Company previously filed with the SEC, and have also been audited by KPMG LLP. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected in the future.

                                           
Year Ended December 31,

2003 2002 2001 2000 1999





(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Statement of Operations Data:
                                       
Total revenues(1)
  $ 760,630     $ 635,412     $ 567,008     $ 605,487     $ 527,566  
Total expenses
    630,639       524,936       490,112       475,798       460,125  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Operating profit
    129,991       110,476       76,896       129,689       67,441  
Other income (expense)
    (8,729 )     120,648       (5,846 )     6,184       32,448  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations before equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated affiliates, income taxes, and minority interest
    121,262       231,124       71,050       135,873       99,889  
Equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated affiliates
    (2,168 )     10,940       24,126       18,375       13,308  
Income tax expense
    42,626       89,561       35,441       51,755       21,012  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations before minority interest
    76,468       152,503       59,735       102,493       92,185  
Minority interest
    553       1,366       524       9,954       19,243  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations
    75,915       151,137       59,211       92,539       72,942  
Income from discontinued operations(2)
          2,339       10,994       7,784       10,061  
Gain on sale of discontinued operations(2)
          20,887                   41,354  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income
  $ 75,915     $ 174,363     $ 70,205     $ 100,323     $ 124,357  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Per Share Data:
                                       
 
Basic
                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 1.00     $ 1.93     $ 0.73     $ 1.09     $ 0.83  
Income from discontinued operations(2)
          0.03       0.14       0.09       0.12  
Gain on sale of discontinued operations(2)
          0.26                   0.47  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income
  $ 1.00     $ 2.22     $ 0.87     $ 1.18     $ 1.42  
     
     
     
     
     
 
 
Diluted
                                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.98     $ 1.85     $ 0.70     $ 1.06     $ 0.82  
Income from discontinued operations
          0.03       0.13       0.09       0.12  
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
          0.26                   0.46  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net income
  $ 0.98     $ 2.14     $ 0.83     $ 1.15     $ 1.40  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Dividends paid
  $ 0.32     $ 0.08     $ 0.08     $ 0.02       0.02  
FLA spin-off(2)
                4.64              

19


 

                                         
Year Ended December 31,

2003 2002 2001 2000 1999





Balance Sheet Data:
                                       
Investment in real estate
  $ 886,076     $ 806,701     $ 736,734     $ 562,181     $ 825,577  
Cash and investments(3)
    57,403       73,273       200,225       201,905       299,944  
Property, plant & equipment, net
    36,272       42,907       49,826       59,665       386,437  
Total assets
    1,275,730       1,169,887       1,340,559       1,115,021       1,821,627  
Total stockholders’ equity
    487,315       480,093       518,073       569,084       940,854  


(1)  Total revenues includes real estate revenues from property sales; realty revenues consisting of property and asset management fees, construction management fees, and lease and sales commissions; timber sales; rental revenues; club operations revenues; management fees; development fees; and transportation revenues. Net operating results of the residential real estate services and sugar segments are shown separately as income from discontinued operations for all years presented.
 
(2)  On October 9, 2000 the Company distributed to its shareholders all of its equity interest in Florida East Coast Industries, Inc. (“FLA”). To effect the distribution, the Company exchanged its 19,609,216 shares of FLA common stock for an equal number of shares of a new class of FLA common stock. On October 9, 2000, the new class of stock, FLA.B, was distributed prorata to the Company’s shareholders in a tax-free distribution. For each share of the Company common stock owned of record on September 18, 2000, the Company’s shareholders received 0.23103369 of a share of FLA.B common stock.
 
(3)  Includes cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities.

 
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

      The St. Joe Company is one of Florida’s largest real estate operating companies. We have one of the largest inventories of private land suitable for development in the State of Florida, with very low cost basis. The majority of our land is located in Northwest Florida. In order to optimize the value of our core real estate assets in Northwest Florida, our strategic plan calls for us to reposition our timberland holdings for higher and better uses. We increase the value of our raw land assets, most of which are currently managed as timberland, through the development and subsequent sale of parcels, home sites, and homes, or through the direct sale of unimproved land. In addition, we reinvest qualifying asset sales proceeds into like-kind properties under our tax deferral strategy which has enabled us to create a significant portfolio of commercial rental properties. We also provide commercial real estate services, including brokerage, property management and construction management.

      We have four operating segments: community development; commercial real estate development and services; land sales; and forestry.

      Our community development segment generates revenues from:

  •  the sale of housing units built by us;
 
  •  the sale of developed home sites;
 
  •  rental income;
 
  •  club operations;
 
  •  investments in limited partnerships and joint ventures;
 
  •  brokerage fees; and
 
  •  management fees.

20


 

      Our commercial real estate development and services segment generates revenues from:

  •  the rental of properties owned by us;
 
  •  the sale of developed and undeveloped land and in-service buildings;
 
  •  realty revenues, consisting of property and asset management fees, construction management fees and lease and sales brokerage commissions;
 
  •  development fees; and
 
  •  investments in limited partnerships and joint ventures.

      Our land sales segment generates revenues from:

  •  the sale of parcels of undeveloped land; and
 
  •  the sale of a limited amount of developed rural home sites.

      Our forestry segment generates revenues from:

  •  the sale of pulpwood and timber; and
 
  •  the sale of bulk land.

      Our ability to generate revenues, cash flows and profitability is directly related to the real estate market, primarily in Florida, and the economy in general. Considerable economic and political uncertainties exist that could have adverse effects on consumer buying behavior, construction costs, availability of labor and materials and other factors affecting us and the real estate industry in general. Additionally, increases in interest rates could reduce the demand for homes we build, particularly primary housing, commercial properties we develop or sell, and lots we develop. However, we believe our secondary resort housing markets are less sensitive to changes in interest rates. We have the ability to mitigate these risks by building to contract as well as building in phases. Management periodically conducts market research in the early stages of a project’s development to ensure our product meets expected customer demand. We also continuously and actively monitor local competitors’ product offerings to evaluate the competitive position of our products. Real estate market conditions in our regions of development, particularly for residential and resort property in Northwest Florida, have been exceptionally strong. These current market conditions place us in an unusually favorable position which may not continue in the future. However, we believe that long-term prospects of job growth, coupled with strong in-migration population expansion in Florida, indicate that demand levels may remain favorable over at least the next two to five years.

      Our commercial real estate development and services segment continues to build on strong market interest in Northwest Florida’s retail, office, multi-family and other mixed-use products caused by historical constraints on supply in the area as well as high interest by developers. Although the timing of transactions in this business is hard to predict, we expect 2004 results to be the same as or better than 2003 results.

 
Forward-Looking Statements

      Management’s discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements, including statements about our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, estimates and intentions, as well as trends and uncertainties that could affect our results. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, many of which are beyond our control. For additional information concerning these factors and related matters, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1 of this Report.

21


 

 
Critical Accounting Estimates

      The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base these estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that management believes are reasonable under the circumstances. Additionally, we evaluate the results of these estimates on an on-going basis. Management’s estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

      We believe the following critical accounting policies reflect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

      Investment in Real Estate and Cost of Real Estate Sales. Costs associated with a specific real estate project are capitalized once we determine that the project is economically viable. We capitalize costs directly associated with development and construction of identified real estate projects. Indirect costs that clearly relate to a specific project under development, such as internal costs of a regional project field office, are also capitalized. We capitalize interest based on the amount of underlying expenditures (up to total interest expense), and real estate taxes on real estate projects under development. If we determine not to complete a project, any previously capitalized costs are expensed.

      Real estate inventory costs include land and common development costs (such as roads, sewers, and amenities), home construction costs, property taxes, capitalized interest, and certain indirect costs. A portion of real estate inventory and estimates for costs to complete are allocated to each unit based on the relative sales value of each unit as compared to the estimated sales value of the total project. These estimates are reevaluated at least annually, with any adjustments being allocated prospectively to the remaining units available for sale. The accounting estimate related to inventory valuation is susceptible to change due to the use of assumptions about future sales proceeds and related real estate expenditures. Management’s assumptions about future housing and home site sales prices, sales volume and sales velocity require significant judgment because the real estate market is cyclical and highly sensitive to changes in economic conditions. In addition, actual results could differ from management’s estimates due to changes in anticipated development, construction and overhead costs. Although we have not made significant adjustments affecting real estate gross profit margins in the past, there can be no assurances that estimates used to generate future real estate gross profit margins will not differ from our current estimates.

      Revenue Recognition — Percentage-of-Completion. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate, revenue for multi-family residences under construction is recognized on the percentage-of-completion method when (1) construction is beyond a preliminary stage, (2) the buyer is committed to the extent of being unable to require a refund except for nondelivery of the unit, (3) sufficient units have already been sold to assure that the entire property will not revert to rental property, (4) sales price is assured, and (5) aggregate sales proceeds and costs can be reasonably estimated. Revenue is recognized in proportion to the percentage of total costs incurred in relation to estimated total costs.

      Impairment of Long-lived Assets and Goodwill. Our long-lived assets, primarily real estate held for investment, are carried at cost unless circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is warranted. This review involves a number of assumptions and estimates used in determining whether impairment exists, including estimation of undiscounted cash flows. Depending on the asset, we use varying methods to determine fair value, such as (i) discounting of expected future cash flows, (ii) determining resale values by market, or (iii) applying a capitalization rate to net operating income using prevailing rates in a given market. These methods of determining fair value can fluctuate up

22


 

or down significantly as a result of a number of factors, including changes in the general economy of our markets and demand for real estate. If we determine that impairment exists due to the inability to recover an asset’s carrying value, a provision for loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds estimated fair value.

      Goodwill is carried at the lower of cost or fair value and is tested for impairment at least annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is warranted, by comparing the carrying amount of the net assets of each reporting unit with goodwill to the fair value of the reporting unit taken as a whole. The impairment review involves a number of assumptions and estimates including estimating discounted future cash flows, net operating income, future economic conditions, fair value of assets held and discount rates. If this comparison indicates that the goodwill of a particular reporting unit is impaired, the aggregate of the fair value of each of the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit are compared to the fair value of the reporting unit to determine the amount of goodwill impairment, if any.

      Intangibles. We allocate the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their respective fair values, using customary estimates of fair value, including data from appraisals, comparable sales, discounted cash flow analysis and other methods. These fair values can fluctuate up or down significantly as a result of a number of factors and estimates, including changes in the general economy of our markets, demand for real estate, and fair market values assigned to leases as well as fair value assigned to customer relationships.

      Pension Plan. The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan covering a majority of our employees. Currently, our pension plan is over-funded and contributes income to the Company. The accounting for pension benefits is determined by standardized accounting and actuarial methods using numerous estimates, including discount rates, expected long-term investment returns on plan assets, employee turnover, mortality and retirement ages, and future salary increases. Changes in these key assumptions can have a significant impact on the income contributed by the pension plan. We engage the services of an independent actuary and investment consultant to assist us in determining these assumptions and in the calculation of pension income. For example, in 2003, a 1% increase in the assumed long-term rate of return on pension assets would have resulted in a $2.2 million increase in pre-tax income ($1.4 million net of tax). A 1% decrease in the assumed long-term rate of return would have caused an equivalent decrease in income. A 1% increase in the assumed discount rate on pension obligations would have resulted in a $0.4 million decrease in pre-tax income ($0.3 million net of tax). A 1% decrease in the assumed discount rate would have resulted in a $0.6 million increase in pre-tax income ($0.4 million net of tax).

      Income Taxes. In preparing our consolidated financial statements, significant management judgment is required to estimate our income taxes. Our estimates are based on our interpretation of federal and state tax laws. We estimate our actual current tax due and assess temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. The temporary differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included in our consolidated balance sheet. Adjustments may be required by a change in assessment of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, changes due to audit adjustments by federal and state tax authorities, and changes in tax laws. To the extent adjustments are required in any given period we would include the adjustments in the tax provision in the statement of operations and/or balance sheet. These adjustments could materially impact our financial position and results of operation.

Results of Operations

      Net income for 2003 was $75.9 million, or $0.98 per diluted share, compared with $174.4 million, or $2.14 per diluted share, in 2002 and $70.2 million, or $0.83 per diluted share, in 2001. The results for 2003 included a non-cash asset impairment charge, net of tax, relating to Advantis, our commercial real estate services unit, of $8.8 million, or $0.11 per diluted share. The results for 2002 included a net gain on the sale of Arvida Realty Services (“ARS”), our former residential real estate services segment, of $20.7 million, or $0.25 per diluted share, and a gain on the forward sale of securities of $86.4 million, or

23


 

$1.06 per diluted share. Results for 2002 included earnings from the discontinued operations of ARS of $2.3 million, or $0.03 per diluted share and $11.0 million, or $0.13 per diluted share in 2001.

      We report revenues from our four operating segments: community development, commercial real estate development and services, land sales, and forestry. Real estate sales are generated from sales of housing units and developed home sites in our community development segment, developed and undeveloped land and in-service buildings in our commercial real estate development and services segment, parcels of undeveloped land and developed rural sites in our land sales segment and occasionally sales of bulk land from our forestry segment. Realty revenues, consisting of property and asset management fees, construction management fees, and lease and sales commissions, are generated from the commercial real estate development and services segment. Timber sales are generated from the forestry segment. Rental revenue is generated primarily from lease income related to our portfolio of investment and development properties as a component of the commercial real estate development and services segment. Other revenues are primarily club operations and management fees from the community development segment and development fees from the commercial real estate development and services segment.

 
Consolidated Results

      Revenues and Expenses. The following table sets forth a comparison of the revenues and expenses for the three years ended December 31, 2003.

                                                             
Years Ended December 31, 2003 vs. 2002 2002 vs. 2001



2003 2002 2001 Difference % Change Difference % Change







(Dollars in millions)
Revenues:
                                                       
 
Real estate sales
  $ 592.2     $ 484.0     $ 444.0     $ 108.2       22 %   $ 40.0       9 %
 
Realty
    62.5       58.5       56.0       4.0       7       2.5       4  
 
Timber sales
    36.6       40.7       37.0       (4.1 )     (10 )     3.7       10  
 
Rental
    40.8       33.2       20.8       7.6       23       12.4       60  
 
Other
    28.5       19.0       9.2       9.5       50       9.8       107  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total
    760.6       635.4       567.0       125.2       20       68.4       12  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Expenses:
                                                       
 
Cost of real estate sales
    353.2       290.8       298.7       62.4       22       (7.9 )     (3 )
 
Cost of realty revenues
    36.2       33.2       32.8       3.0       9       0.4       1  
 
Cost of timber sales
    24.2       28.9       24.3       (4.7 )     (16 )     4.6       19  
 
Cost of rental revenues
    17.7       14.5       9.7       3.2       22       4.8       49  
 
Cost of other revenues
    27.2       23.1       9.4       4.1       18       13.7       146  
 
Other operating expenses
    91.7       84.2       74.5       7.5       9       9.7       13  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
   
Total
  $ 550.2     $ 474.7     $ 449.4     $ 75.5       16 %   $ 25.3       6 %
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

      The increases in revenues from real estate sales and costs of real estate sales were in each case primarily due to increased sales in the community development segment, partially offset by decreases in the commercial real estate development and services segment, which is a function of the sale of several large in-service buildings in 2002 and 2001 with no such sales in 2003. The increase in realty revenues was due to increases in brokerage and construction revenues, which were partially offset by a small decrease in property management revenues. The increase in cost of realty revenues was due to increases in the costs of brokerage, property management, and construction revenues. The increases in rental revenues and costs of rental revenues were in each case primarily due to an increase in the amount of investment in operating property in the commercial real estate development and services segment. Other revenues and costs of other revenues increased primarily due to increases in the community development segment’s club operations. Other operating expenses increased from 2002 to 2003 primarily due to increases in the community development segment and the commercial real estate development and services segment. Other

24


 

operating expenses increased from 2001 to 2002 primarily due to an increase in the community development segment. For further discussion of revenues and expenses, see Segment Results below.

      Corporate Expense. Corporate expense, which represents corporate general and administrative expenses, increased $7.0 million, or 25%, to $34.5 million in 2003, from $27.5 million in 2002. The increase was primarily due to a $4.3 million decrease in the income contribution from the St. Joe Company Pension Plan (the “Pension Plan”) and an increase in employee benefit costs of $2.3 million. Corporate expense increased $8.7 million, or 46%, in 2002 from $18.8 million in 2001. This increase was primarily due to a $3.6 million decrease in the income contribution from the Pension Plan, an increase in employee benefit costs of $3.6 million, and $1.5 million in costs associated with the secondary offering of our common stock completed by the Trust in 2002. For the year 2001, the long-term actuarial expected return for the assets of the Pension Plan was 9.2%. Based on the performance of our mix of pension assets over the previous three years, we lowered the long-term expected return to 8.5%. Management does not expect the over-funded position of the Pension Plan to continue to decline. We do not expect to have to fund the Pension Plan in the foreseeable future, unless market conditions deteriorate significantly.

      Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased $8.7 million, or 38%, to $31.5 million in 2003, compared to $22.8 million in 2002. The increase was due to a $6.6 million increase in depreciation resulting primarily from additional investments in commercial and residential operating property and property, plant and equipment and a $2.1 million increase in amortization primarily resulting from an increase in intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization increased $1.5 million, or 7%, to $22.8 million in 2002, compared to $21.3 million in 2001. The increase was due to a $6.6 million increase in depreciation resulting primarily from expenditures for commercial and residential operating property and property, plant and equipment. This increase was partially offset by the impact of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“FAS 142”), which resulted in the cessation of goodwill amortization as of January 1, 2002. Goodwill amortization was $4.2 million in 2001, excluding $5.3 million included in discontinued operations.

      Impairment Losses. During 2003, we recorded an impairment loss to reduce the carrying amount of Advantis’ goodwill from $28.9 million to $14.8 million, pursuant to FAS 142. This resulted in an impairment loss of $14.1 million pre-tax, $8.8 million net of tax. See note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. No impairment losses were recorded in 2002. Impairment losses of $0.3 million and $0.5 million were recorded in 2003 and 2001, respectively, related to commercial properties.

      Other Income (Expense). Other income (expense) was $(8.7) million in 2003, $120.6 million in 2002 and $(5.8) million in 2001. Other income (expense) was made up of investment income, interest expense, gains on sales and dispositions of assets and other income and, in 2002 and 2001, gains and losses on the valuation and settlement of forward sale contracts.

      In October 1999, we entered into a forward sale transaction with a major financial institution that, in effect, provided for the monetization of our long-held portfolio of equity investments which, at December 31, 1998, had a cost of approximately $1.7 million and a fair value of approximately $144 million. Under the forward sale agreement, we received approximately $111 million in cash and were required to settle the forward transaction by October 15, 2002, by delivering either the securities or the equivalent value of the securities in cash to the financial institution. The agreement permitted us to retain that amount of the securities representing appreciation up to 20% of their value on October 15, 1999 should the value of the securities increase. The securities were recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and the related unrealized gain, net of tax, was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. At the time of entering into the forward sale contracts, we recorded a liability in long-term debt for approximately $111.1 million, subject to increase as interest expense was imputed at an annual rate of 7.9%. The liability was also subject to increase by the amount, if any, that the fair value of the securities increased beyond the retained 20%.

      On February 26, 2002 and October 15, 2002, in two separate transactions, we settled our forward sale contracts by delivering equity securities to the financial institution for an aggregate pre-tax gain of $132.9 million. The liability related to the contracts settled in February was $97.0 million at the time of

25


 

settlement and the resulting gain recognized in the first quarter of 2002 was $94.7 million pre-tax. The liability related to the contracts settled in October was $38.6 million at the time of settlement and the resulting gain recognized in the fourth quarter of 2002 was approximately $38.2 million pre-tax.

      Investment income decreased to $0.9 million in 2003 from $2.9 million in 2002, primarily due to lower dividend income resulting from the disposition of securities. Interest expense decreased $4.5 million to $12.5 million in 2003 compared to $17.0 million in 2002, due to the settlement of the debt related to the forward sale contracts, which was partially offset by interest expense attributable to medium term notes we issued in 2002, and interest attributable to debt secured by commercial buildings. Other income was $2.9 million in 2003 as compared to $1.8 million in 2002. Other income included a loss on the valuation of forward sale contracts of $(0.9) million in 2002. Investment income decreased to $2.9 million in 2002, from $5.1 million in 2001, primarily due to lower dividend income resulting from the disposition of securities. Interest expense decreased $0.3 million to $17.0 million in 2002 compared to $17.3 million in 2001, due to the settlement of the debt related to the forward sale contracts, which was partially offset by interest expense attributable to medium term notes we issued in 2002, and interest attributable to debt secured by commercial buildings. Other income was $1.8 million in 2002 as compared to $6.4 million in 2001. Other income includes a loss on the valuation of forward sale contracts of $(0.9) million in 2002, compared to a gain on the valuation of forward sale contracts of $4.0 million in 2001.

      Equity in (Loss) Income of Unconsolidated Affiliates. We have investments in affiliates that are accounted for by the equity method of accounting. Equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated affiliates totaled $(2.2) million in 2003, $10.9 million in 2002 and $24.1 million in 2001.

      The community development segment’s unconsolidated affiliates include our 26% limited partnership interest in Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. (“Arvida/JMB”). Arvida/JMB completed its operations in 2003 and is currently winding up its affairs. As a result, the contribution to pre-tax income from Arvida/JMB substantially ended at the end of 2002. Arvida/JMB has finalized its current estimates of future costs and future cash distributions associated with the completion of operations, and, as a result, we adjusted our investment in the partnership by a $3.5 million pre-tax charge in 2003. Arvida/JMB’s contribution to equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated affiliates was $13.2 million in 2002 and $24.0 million in 2001. Based on current expectations, we do not anticipate any material future income or losses from our investment in Arvida/JMB.

      The commercial real estate development and services segment recorded equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated affiliates of $1.9 million in 2003, $(1.0) million in 2002, and $0.2 million in 2001. Included was $(0.3) million in 2003, $(0.3) million in 2002, and $0.9 million in 2001 related to our 50% interest in Codina Group, Inc. (“Codina”), a commercial services company headquartered in Coral Gables, Florida. Although 2003 and 2002 results were negative, we expect Codina to return to profitability in the near term. In 2003, we sold our 45% partnership interest in the 355 Alhambra building, recognizing a gain of $1.0 million which is included in income of unconsolidated affiliates.

      Income Tax Expense. Income tax expense on continuing operations totaled $42.6 million in 2003, $89.6 million for 2002 and $35.4 million for 2001. Our effective tax rate decreased to 35% in 2003 compared to 39% in 2002 and 37% in 2001 because the deferred tax liability for state taxes was reduced to reflect the effect of a recently implemented state tax strategy.

      Discontinued Operations. Discontinued operations included the gain on sale and the operations of ARS and the gain on sale and operations of two commercial office buildings disposed of in 2002. These entities’ results are not included in income from continuing operations.

      As a result of rapid consolidation in the real estate services business, we had the opportunity to sell ARS, our wholly-owned subsidiary, at an attractive value. We completed the sale of ARS on April 17, 2002. The gain recorded on the sale was $33.7 million before taxes, or $20.7 million net of taxes. Prior to its sale, ARS generated revenues of $76.2 million, operating expenses of $71.7 million and net income of $2.3 million during 2002. During 2001, ARS generated revenues of $277.3 million, operating expenses of $252.9 million, and net income of $11.0 million.

26


 

 
Segment Results

      Community Development. The table below sets forth the results of operations of our community development segment for the three years ended December 31, 2003.

                             
Years Ended December 31,

2003 2002 2001



(In millions)
Revenues:
                       
 
Real estate sales
  $ 467.3     $ 371.2     $ 235.6  
 
Rental revenues
    0.8       0.8       0.7  
 
Other revenues
    26.8       14.7       3.4  
     
     
     
 
   
Total revenues
    494.9       386.7       239.7  
     
     
     
 
Expenses:
                       
 
Cost of real estate sales
    332.9       260.8       173.4  
 
Cost of rental revenues
    1.6       1.6       1.2  
 
Cost of other revenues
    26.6       20.6       6.2  
 
Other operating expenses
    44.6       38.7       32.7  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    8.6       4.4       2.0  
     
     
     
 
   
Total expenses
    414.3       326.1       215.5  
     
     
     
 
Other income
          0.2       0.4  
     
     
     
 
Pretax income from continuing operations
  $ 80.6     $ 60.8     $ 24.6  
     
     
     
 

      Our community development division develops large-scale, mixed-use communities primarily on land we have owned for a long period of time. We own large tracts of land in Northwest Florida, including significant Gulf of Mexico beach frontage and waterfront properties, and in west Florida near Tallahassee, the state capital. Our residential homebuilding in North Carolina and South Carolina is conducted through Saussy Burbank, Inc. (“Saussy Burbank”), a wholly owned subsidiary.

 
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002

      Real estate sales include sales of homes and home sites and sales of land. Cost of sales includes direct costs, selling costs and other indirect costs. In 2003, the components of cost of real estate sales were $276.4 million in direct costs, $23.6 million in selling costs, and $31.3 million in other indirect costs. In 2002, the components of cost of real estate sales were $220.5 million in direct costs, $17.8 million in selling costs, and $22.5 million in other indirect costs.

      Sales of homes in 2003 totaled $348.4 million, with related cost of sales of $287.8 million, resulting in a gross profit percentage of 17%, compared to sales in 2002 of $271.3 million, with cost of sales of $226.6 million, resulting in a gross profit percentage of 17%. Cost of real estate sales for homes in 2003 consisted of $242.1 million in direct costs, $17.8 million in selling costs, and $27.9 million in indirect costs. Cost of real estate sales for homes in 2002 consisted of $193.8 million in direct costs, $12.8 million in selling costs, and $20.0 million in indirect costs. Sales of home sites in 2003 totaled $115.7 million, with related cost of sales of $43.5 million, resulting in a gross profit percentage of 62%, compared to sales in 2002 of $99.3 million, with related cost of sales of $34.2 million, resulting in a gross profit percentage of 66%. Cost of real estate sales for home sites in 2003 consisted of $34.3 million in direct costs, $5.8 million in selling costs, and $3.4 million in indirect costs. Cost of real estate sales for home sites in 2002 consisted of $26.7 million in direct costs, $5.0 million in selling costs, and $2.5 million in indirect costs. The increase in real estate sales was due to an increase in the number of units sold and higher selling prices. Cost of

27


 

real estate sales increased primarily due to the increased volume of sales. The following table sets forth home and home site sales activity by individual developments:
                                                                         
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Year Ended December 31, 2002


Closed Cost of Gross Closed Cost of Gross
Units Revenues Sales Profit Units Revenues Sales Profit








(Dollars in millions)
Northwest Florida:
                                                               
 
Walton County:
                                                               
   
WaterColor:
                                                               
     
Homes:
                                                               
       
Single-family
    12     $ 9.6     $ 6.4     $ 3.2       13     $ 10.5     $ 6.5     $ 4.0  
       
Multi-family
    18       2.6       2.7       (0.1 )     45       23.3       17.8       5.5  
       
Private Residence Club
          1.2       0.7       0.5                          
     
Home sites
    206       57.1       22.5       34.6       172       42.7       15.0       27.7  
   
WaterSound:
                                                               
     
Multi-family homes
    30       72.1       45.1       27.0             18.5       11.4       7.1  
     
Home sites
    93       38.1       12.6       25.5       64       25.6       10.0       15.6  
 
Bay County:
                                                               
   
The Hammocks:
                                                               
     
Homes
    48       6.8       6.1       0.7       32       4.6       4.1       0.5  
     
Home sites
    30       0.9       0.7       0.2       36       1.1       0.6       0.5  
   
Palmetto Trace: Homes
    88       13.6       12.1       1.5       43       6.4       5.6       0.8  
   
Summerwood: Homes
                            12       1.8       1.8        
   
Woodrun: Homes
                0.4       (0.4 )     1       0.3       0.4       (0.1 )
   
Other Bay County: Home sites
                            1       0.1       0.1        
 
Leon County:
                                                               
   
SouthWood:
                                                               
     
Homes
    133       27.0       23.2       3.8       115       21.3       18.5       2.8  
     
Home sites
    63       5.7       2.6       3.1       65       6.1       2.8       3.3  
 
Gulf County:
                                                               
   
Windmark Beach: Home sites
    13       7.3       1.2       6.1       67       22.1       4.6       17.5  
Northeast Florida:
                                                               
 
St. Johns County:
                                                               
   
St. Johns Golf & Country Club:
                                                               
     
Homes
    124       39.6       33.1       6.5       111       34.1       27.6       6.5  
     
Home sites
    40       2.2       1.0       1.2       21       1.0       0.7       0.3  
 
Duval County:
                                                               
   
James Island: Homes
    59       19.8       17.1       2.7       72       22.5       19.3       3.2  
   
Hampton Park: Homes
    50       16.1       14.0       2.1       35       11.3       9.9       1.4  
Central Florida:
                                                               
 
Volusia County:
                                                               
   
Victoria Park:
                                                               
     
Homes
    124       24.3       21.7       2.6       77       14.1       12.0       2.1  
     
Home sites
    32       2.3       1.4       0.9       12       0.6       0.4       0.2  
   
Artisan Park: Home sites
    10       1.3       0.7       0.6                          

28


 

                                                                     
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Year Ended December 31, 2002


Closed Cost of Gross Closed Cost of Gross
Units Revenues Sales Profit Units Revenues Sales Profit








(Dollars in millions)
North Carolina and South Carolina:
                                                               
 
Saussy Burbank:
                                                               
   
Homes
    555       115.7       105.2       10.5       523       102.6       91.7       10.9  
   
Home sites
    32       0.8       0.8                                
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total
    1,760     $ 464.1     $ 331.3     $ 132.8       1,517     $ 370.6     $ 260.8     $ 109.8  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

      Revenue and costs of sales associated with multi-family units under construction are recognized using the percentage of completion method of accounting. Revenue is recognized in proportion to the percentage of total costs incurred in relation to estimated total costs. If a deposit is received for less than 10%, percentage of completion accounting is not utilized. Instead, full accrual accounting criteria is used, which generally recognizes revenue when sales contracts are closed and adequate investment from the buyer is received. In the WaterSound community, deposits of 10% are required upon executing the contract and another 10% is required 180 days later. All deposits are non-refundable, except for non-delivery of the unit. In the event a contract does not close for reasons other than non-delivery, we are entitled to retain the deposit. However, the revenue and margin related to the previously recorded contract would be reversed. Revenues and cost of sales associated with multi-family units where construction has been completed are recognized on the full accrual method of accounting, as contracts are closed.

      At WaterColor, the average price of a single-family residence sold in 2003 was $801,000, compared to $800,000 in 2002 which was solely due to the product mix sold. In general, sales prices for homes with similar sizes and locations have increased in 2003. The gross profit percentage from single-family residence sales decreased to 33% in 2003 from 38% in 2002 primarily due to increases in construction and development costs. The decrease in revenue and cost of revenue on multi-family residences was due to a decline in the number of units for sale. The gross profit percentage on multi-family home sales decreased to (4)% in 2003 from 24% in 2002 primarily due to increased development and construction costs in 2003 associated with the wind up of the first phase of multi-family residences. The average price of a home site sold in 2003 was $280,000, compared to $248,000 in 2002. The gross profit percentage from home site sales decreased to 61% in 2003 from 65% in 2002 primarily due to increases in development costs associated with amenities and roadway improvement.

      At WaterSound, multi-family unit percentage of completion contributions to income began in the fourth quarter of 2002 and continued for the full year in 2003. The gross profit percentage on home sites increased to 67% in 2003 from 61% in 2002 primarily due to increases in sales prices.

      At WindMark Beach, revenues have decreased as a result of a decrease in units offered for sale. The gross profit percentage on home site sales has increased to 84% in 2003 from 79% in 2002 due a change in the mix of relative locations of the home sites sold and to sales price increases on comparable home sites.

      At St. Johns Golf and Country Club, the gross profit percentage on home sales decreased to 16% in 2003 from 19% in 2002 primarily due to higher development and construction costs in 2003. The gross profit percentage on home site sales increased to 55% in 2003 from 30% in 2002 primarily due to higher parcel development costs in 2002.

      At Victoria Park, the gross profit percentage on home sales decreased to 11% in 2003 from 15% in 2002 because the mix of homes sold in 2003 included more homes located in the active adult community, which has higher parcel development costs. The gross profit percentage on home site sales increased to 39% in 2003 from 33% in 2002 primarily due to the deferral of revenue in 2002 on several of the home sites as a result of contingencies in the sales contracts.

      At Saussy Burbank, the gross profit percentage on home sales has decreased to 9% in 2003 from 11% in 2002 primarily due to an increase in lot costs and a change in the mix of locations of homes sold.

29


 

      Overall, we expect margins in the community development segment to remain stable in the near future.

      Other revenues totaled $26.8 million in 2003 with $26.6 million in related costs, compared to revenues totaling $14.7 million in 2002 with $20.6 million in related costs. These included revenues from the WaterColor Inn, which began operations in 2002, other resort operations and management fees.

      Other operating expenses, including salaries and benefits of personnel and other administrative expenses, increased $5.9 million during 2003 compared to 2002. The increase was primarily due to increases in project administration costs and marketing costs attributable to the increase in residential development activity.

 
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001

      Real estate sales include sales of home and home sites and sales of land. Cost of sales includes direct costs, selling costs and other indirect costs. In 2001, the components of cost of sales were $147.2 million in direct costs, $11.3 million in selling costs, and $14.2 million in other indirect costs.

      Sales and cost of sales of homes and home sites for 2002 are discussed above. Sales of homes in 2001 totaled $184.6 million with related cost of sales of $154.5 million, resulting in a gross profit percentage of 16%. Cost of real estate sales for homes in 2001 consisted of $132.6 million in direct costs, $9.1 million in selling costs, and $12.7 million in indirect costs. Sales of home sites in 2001 totaled $49.8 million with related cost of sales of $18.3 million, resulting in a gross profit percentage of 63%. Cost of real estate sales for home sites in 2001 consisted of $14.6 million in direct costs, $2.2 million in selling costs, and $1.5 million in indirect costs. The increase in real estate sales was due to an increase in the number of units sold and higher selling prices. Cost of real estate sales increased primarily due to the increased volume of sales. The following table sets forth home and home site sales activity by individual developments:

                                                                         
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Year Ended December 31, 2001


Closed Cost of Gross Closed Cost of Gross
Units Revenues Sales Profit Units Revenues Sales Profit








(Dollars in millions)
Northwest Florida:
                                                               
 
Walton County:
                                                               
   
WaterColor:
                                                               
     
Homes:
                                                               
       
Single-family
    13     $ 10.5     $ 6.5     $ 4.0       7     $ 4.8     $ 3.1     $ 1.7  
       
Multi-family
    45       23.3       17.8       5.5       34       27.9       19.0       8.9  
     
Home sites
    172       42.7       15.0       27.7       50       18.8       5.4       13.4  
   
WaterSound:
                                                               
     
Multi-family homes
          18.5       11.4       7.1                          
     
Home sites
    64       25.6       10.0       15.6       44       14.1       5.9       8.2  
 
Bay County:
                                                               
   
The Hammocks:
                                                               
     
Homes
    32       4.6       4.1       0.5       42       5.4       4.7       0.7  
     
Home sites
    36       1.1       0.6       0.5                          
   
Palmetto Trace: Homes
    43       6.4       5.6       0.8                          
   
Summerwood: Homes
    12       1.8       1.8             58       8.9       7.8       1.1  
   
Woodrun:
                                                               
     
Homes
    1       0.3       0.4       (0.1 )     3       0.7       0.7        
     
Home sites
                            17       0.5       0.4       0.1  
   
Other Bay County: Home sites
    1       0.1       0.1             14       0.4       0.1       0.3  

30


 

                                                                       
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Year Ended December 31, 2001


Closed Cost of Gross Closed Cost of Gross
Units Revenues Sales Profit Units Revenues Sales Profit








(Dollars in millions)
 
Leon County:
                                                               
   
SouthWood:
                                                               
     
Homes
    115       21.3       18.5       2.8       33       6.1       5.6       0.5  
     
Home sites
    65       6.1       2.8       3.3       63       4.2       2.2       2.0  
 
Franklin County:
                                                               
   
Driftwood: Home sites
                            3       0.4       0.1       0.3  
 
Gulf County:
                                                               
   
Windmark Beach: Home sites
    67       22.1       4.6       17.5       20       4.0       1.2       2.8  
Northeast Florida:
                                                               
 
St. Johns County:
                                                               
   
St. Johns Golf & Country Club:
                                                               
     
Homes
    111       34.1       27.6       6.5       66       19.1       15.9       3.2  
     
Home sites
    21       1.0       0.7       0.3       69       3.4       2.2       1.2  
   
RiverTown: Home sites
                            8       3.0       0.2       2.8  
 
Duval County:
                                                               
   
James Island: Homes
    72       22.5       19.3       3.2       76       24.7       21.3       3.4  
   
Hampton Park: Homes
    35       11.3       9.9       1.4       1       0.3       0.2       0.1  
Central Florida:
                                                               
 
Volusia County:
                                                               
   
Victoria Park:
                                                               
     
Homes
    77       14.1       12.0       2.1       14       2.4       2.0       0.4  
     
Home sites
    12       0.6       0.4       0.2       13       1.0       0.6       0.4  
North Carolina and South Carolina:
                                                               
     
Saussy Burbank: Homes
    523       102.6       91.7       10.9       397       84.3       74.1       10.2  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total
    1,517     $ 370.6     $ 260.8     $ 109.8       1,032     $ 234.4     $ 172.7     $ 61.7  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

      At WaterColor, the average price of a single-family residence sold in 2002 was $800,000 compared to $685,000 in 2001. The increase in average price per unit was primarily due to the change in mix of size and relative location. The decreases in revenue, cost of revenue and gross profit associated with multi-family residences was primarily due to several beachfront multi-family units which closed in 2002, but for which most of the income was recognized in 2001 using the percentage of completion method. The average price of a lot sold in 2002 was $248,000 compared to $376,000 in 2001. The decrease in average price was primarily due to the closing of three beachfront lots during 2001, with an average sales price of $1,228,000 each, compared to no beachfront lots closed in 2002.

      At WaterSound, multi-family unit percentage of completion contributions to income began in 2002. The average price of a home site sold in 2002 was $400,000 compared to $320,000 in 2001. The increase was primarily due to the closing of two gulf front lots in 2002 with an average price of $1,237,500 and two peninsula lots at an average price of $730,000. In addition, a portion of the profit recorded from the 2001 closings was deferred until 2002 because the development of the parcels was not completed until 2002.

      At WindMark Beach, the margin increases in 2002 compared to 2001 were primarily due to increases in sales prices.

      At SouthWood, the margins were higher on homes in 2002 than in 2001 primarily due to higher construction costs in 2001. The margins were higher on home sites due to a change in the mix of sizes of the home sites sold.

31


 

      At St. Johns Golf & Country Club, home sales margins were higher in 2002 than in 2001 primarily due to the mix of sizes and relative locations of homes sold. Home site margins were lower in 2002 than in 2001 primarily due to the mix of sizes of the home sites sold.

      Other revenues in 2002 totaled $14.7 million with $20.6 million in related costs, compared to revenues in 2001 totaling $3.4 million with $6.2 million in related costs. These included revenues from the WaterColor Inn, other resort operations and management fees. The WaterColor Inn began operations in 2002.

      The community development operations’ other operating expenses, including salaries and benefits of personnel and other administrative expenses, increased $6.0 million during 2002 compared to 2001. The increase was due to increases in marketing and other administrative expenses associated with new residential development.

      Commercial Real Estate Development and Services. The table below sets forth the results of operations of our commercial real estate development and services segment for the three years ended December 31, 2003.

                             
Years Ended December 31,

2003 2002 2001



(In millions)
Revenues:
                       
 
Real estate sales
  $ 25.6     $ 28.2     $ 131.9  
 
Realty revenues
    62.5       58.5       56.0  
 
Rental revenues
    40.0       32.4       20.2  
 
Other revenues
    1.8       1.1       2.5  
     
     
     
 
   
Total revenues
    129.9       120.2       210.6  
     
     
     
 
Expenses:
                       
 
Cost of real estate sales
    7.0       20.8       117.8  
 
Cost of realty revenues
    36.2       33.2       32.7  
 
Cost of rental revenues
    16.4       12.7       8.5  
 
Other operating expenses
    36.6       32.8       32.9  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    15.3       10.3       10.0  
 
Impairment loss
    14.1             0.5  
     
     
     
 
   
Total expenses
    125.6       109.8       202.4  
Other expense
    (7.8 )     (7.5 )     (3.3 )
     
     
     
 
Pretax income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ (3.5 )   $ 2.9     $ 4.9  
     
     
     
 
 
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2002

      Rental Revenues. Rental revenues generated by our commercial real estate development and services segment owned operating properties increased $7.6 million, or 23%, in 2003 compared to 2002, due to six buildings placed in service or acquired during 2003 and an increase in the overall leased percentage of rental properties. Operating expenses relating to these revenues increased $3.7 million, or 29% primarily due to the six buildings placed in service and increased occupancy as well as increases in property taxes, utilities and upgraded security at most of the buildings. As of December 31, 2003, our commercial real estate development and services segment had interests in 24 operating properties with 2.9 million total rentable square feet in service, including two buildings, totaling approximately 0.2 million square feet, that were owned by partnerships and accounted for using the equity method of accounting. At December 31, 2002, our commercial real estate development and services segment had interests in 19 operating properties with 2.4 million total rentable square feet in service, including three buildings, totaling 0.4 million square

32


 

feet, that were owned by partnerships and accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The overall leased percentage increased to 83% at December 31, 2003, compared to 81% at December 31, 2002. Further information about commercial income producing properties majority owned by the Company, along with results of operations for 2003 and 2002, is presented in the tables below.
                                         
Net Rentable Percentage Net Rentable Percentage
Square Feet at Leased at Square Feet at Leased at
December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
Location 2003 2003 2002 2002





Buildings purchased with tax- deferred proceeds:
                                       
Harbourside
    Clearwater, FL       147,000       92 %     146,000       86 %
Prestige Place One and Two
    Clearwater, FL       144,000       86       143,000       84  
Lakeview
    Tampa, FL       125,000       77       125,000       76  
Palm Court
    Tampa, FL       60,000       68       62,000       61  
Westside Corporate Center
    Plantation, FL       100,000       86       100,000       86  
280 Interstate North
    Atlanta, GA       126,000       71       126,000       67  
Southhall Center
    Orlando, FL       155,000       88       155,000       94  
1133 20th Street
    Washington, DC       119,000       99       119,000       99  
1750 K Street
    Washington, DC       152,000       90       152,000       94  
Millenia Park One
    Orlando, FL       158,000       68       158,000       44  
Beckrich Office One
    Panama City Beach, FL       34,000       96       34,000       88  
5660 New Northside
    Atlanta, GA       272,000       91       275,000       96  
SouthWood Office One
    Tallahassee, FL       88,000       73       (a)       (a)  
Crescent Ridge
    Charlotte, NC       158,000       100       (b)       (b)  
Windward Plaza
    Atlanta, GA       465,000       89       (b)       (b)  
             
     
     
         
Subtotal
            2,303,000       86       1,595,000       83  
             
     
     
         
Development property:
                                       
Westchase Corporate Center
    Houston, TX       184,000       93       184,000       89  
TNT Logistics
    Jacksonville, FL       99,000       83       99,000       73  
245 Riverside
    Jacksonville, FL       134,000       39       (b)       (b)  
SouthWood Office One
    Tallahassee, FL       (a)       (a)       88,000       35  
Beckrich Office Two
    Panama City Beach, FL       34,000       20       (b)       (b)  
             
     
     
         
Subtotal
            451,000       69       371,000       72  
             
     
     
         
Total
            2,754,000       83       1,966,000       81  
             
     
     
         


(a)  During 2003, SouthWood Office One was transferred from development property to buildings purchased with tax-deferred proceeds.
 
(b)  These properties were acquired or completed after the date reported.

                                                                                 
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Year Ended December 31, 2002


Pre-tax Pre-tax
Rental Operating NOI Adjustments Income Rental Operating NOI Adjustments Income
Revenues Expenses (a) (b) (Loss) Revenues Expenses (a) (b) (Loss)










(In millions)
Buildings purchased with tax- deferred proceeds:
                                                                               
Harbourside
  $ 3.0     $ 1.0     $ 2.0     $ (1.4 )   $ 0.6     $ 2.4     $ 1.0     $ 1.4     $ (1.4 )   $  
Prestige Place One and Two
    2.3       1.0       1.3       (1.4 )     (0.1 )     2.0       1.0       1.0       (1.1 )     (0.1 )
Lakeview
    1.9       0.7       1.2       (1.3 )     (0.1 )     2.4       1.0       1.4       (1.2 )     0.2  
Palm Court
    0.5       0.2       0.3       (0.5 )     (0.2 )     0.8       0.3       0.5       (0.4 )     0.1  
Westside Corporate Center
    1.9       1.0       0.9       (1.1 )     (0.2 )     1.9       0.8       1.1       (1.0 )     0.1  

33


 

                                                                                 
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Year Ended December 31, 2002


Pre-tax Pre-tax
Rental Operating NOI Adjustments Income Rental Operating NOI Adjustments Income
Revenues Expenses (a) (b) (Loss) Revenues Expenses (a) (b) (Loss)










(In millions)
280 Interstate North
    1.7       0.8       0.9       (0.9 )           2.2       0.8       1.4       (1.0 )     0.4  
Southhall Center
    2.8       1.0       1.8       (1.5 )     0.3       3.4       1.3       2.1       (1.6 )     0.5  
1133 20th Street
    4.0       1.3       2.7       (2.1 )     0.6       4.1       1.3       2.8       (2.1 )     0.7  
1750 K Street
    5.6       1.9       3.7       (2.9 )     0.8       5.4       1.7       3.7       (2.5 )     1.2  
Millenia Park One
    1.7       0.8       0.9       (1.5 )     (0.6 )     1.0       0.5       0.5       (0.6 )     (0.1 )
Beckrich Office One
    0.4       0.2       0.2       (0.3 )     (0.1 )     0.3       0.2       0.1       (0.2 )     (0.1 )
5660 New Northside
    5.8       1.8       4.0       (1.4 )     2.6       0.3             0.3             0.3  
SouthWood Office One
    0.4       0.3       0.1       (0.4 )     (0.3 )                              
Crescent Ridge
    1.2       0.3       0.9       (0.4 )     0.5                                  
Windward Plaza
    0.8       0.2       0.6       (0.6 )                                      
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Subtotal
  $ 34.0     $ 12.5     $ 21.5     $ (17.7 )   $ 3.8     $ 26.2     $ 9.9     $ 16.3     $ (13.1 )   $ 3.2  
Development property:
                                                                               
Westchase Corporate Center
    4.2       1.6       2.6       (1.8 )     0.8       3.6       1.6       2.0       (2.1 )     (0.1 )
Tree of Life
                                  1.0       0.4       0.6       (0.6 )      
TNT Logistics
    1.4       0.6       0.8       (0.7 )     0.1       1.1       0.3       0.8       (0.8 )      
245 Riverside
    0.2       0.5       (0.3 )     (1.0 )     (1.3 )                              
Nextel Call Center
                                  0.4       0.1       0.3       (0.4 )     (0.1 )
Beckrich Office Two
                      (0.1 )     (0.1 )                                        
Other
    0.2       1.2       (1.0 )     (1.3 )     (2.3 )     0.1       0.4       (0.3 )     (0.4 )     (0.7 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Subtotal
  $ 6.0     $ 3.9     $ 2.1     $ (4.9 )   $ (2.8 )   $ 6.2     $ 2.8     $ 3.4     $ (4.3 )   $ (0.9 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total
  $ 40.0     $ 16.4     $ 23.6     $ (22.6 )   $ 1.0     $ 32.4     $ 12.7     $ 19.7     $ (17.4 )   $ 2.3  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 


(a)  NOI is net operating income.
 
(b)  Adjustments include interest expense, depreciation and amortization.

      Realty Revenues. Advantis’ realty revenues in 2003 increased 7% over 2002 due to increases in brokerage and construction revenues, which were partially offset by a small decrease in property management revenues. Cost of Advantis’ realty revenue increased $3.0 million due to increased broker commissions. Advantis’ other operating expenses, consisting of office administration expenses, increased to $28.9 million in 2003 from $25.6 million in 2002, primarily due to an increase in staffing costs. Advantis recorded a pre-tax loss of $17.8 million for 2003, compared to a pre-tax loss of $1.5 million for 2002, after excluding profit of $2.0 million in 2003 and $1.3 million in 2002 related to intercompany transactions. Although management previously believed that Advantis’ performance would continue to improve despite a very difficult environment for commercial services companies, Advantis’ results of operations declined for the second quarter of 2003 and expectations for future periods were reduced. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment loss to reduce the carrying amount of Advantis’ goodwill from $28.9 million to $14.8 million, pursuant to FAS 142. This resulted in an impairment loss of $14.1 million pre-tax ($8.8 million net of tax). We believe that Advantis’ performance will continue to improve based on current expectations.

34


 

      Real Estate Sales. During 2003, St. Joe Commercial had no building sales. Total proceeds from land sales were $25.6 million, with a pre-tax gain of $18.7 million. Land sales included the following:

                                   
Number of Acres Gross Sales Average
Land Sales Sold Price Price/Acre





(In millions) (In thousands)

Florida:
                               
 
Unimproved
    18       268     $ 13.1     $ 49  
 
Improved
    30       120       11.5       95  
Texas
    1       2       1.0       449  
     
     
     
     
 
Total/ Average
    49       390     $ 25.6     $ 66  
     
     
     
     
 

      During 2002, total proceeds from land sales were $11.0 million, with a pre-tax gain of $4.3 million. Land sales included the following:

                                   
Number of Acres Gross Sales Average
Land Sales Sold Price Price/Acre





(In millions) (In thousands)
Florida:
                               
 
Unimproved
    5       44     $ 2.8     $ 63  
 
Improved
    8       27       2.6       98  
Texas
    3       20       5.6       285  
     
     
     
     
 
Total/ Average
    16       91     $ 11.0     $ 121  
     
     
     
     
 

      Total proceeds for building sales in 2002 were $17.2 million, with a pre-tax gain of $3.1 million. Building sales consisted of:

  •  the sale of the 67,000-square-foot Nextel building located in the Beckrich Office Park in Panama City Beach for $8.1 million, with a pre-tax gain of $1.9 million; and
 
  •  the sale of the 69,000-square-foot Tree of Life building located in St. Augustine, Florida, for $9.1 million, with a pre-tax gain of $1.2 million.

During 2003 and 2002, the commercial segment made significant progress in establishing value for land for retail, apartment and other commercial use in Northwest Florida. Opportunities for the commercial segment have also begun to emerge from activities originated in the community development segment. In 2002, three commercial land parcels were sold at SouthWood in Tallahassee, Florida. These land sales, which are included in the totals above, represented $2.2 million in proceeds and $1.2 million in pre-tax gain.

      Depreciation and amortization was $15.3 million in 2003 compared to $10.3 million in 2002. It was primarily made up of depreciation on the operating properties and amortization of lease intangibles.

 
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001

      Rental Revenues. Rental revenues generated by our commercial real estate development and services segment owned operating properties increased $12.2 million in 2002 compared to 2001 due to five new buildings placed in service or acquired during 2002, partially offset by two buildings sold during 2002, and two new buildings placed in service or acquired late in the year in 2001. Operating expenses relating to these revenues increased $4.9 million. As of December 31, 2002, our commercial real estate development and services segment had interests in 19 operating properties with 2.4 million total rentable square feet in service including three buildings, totaling 0.4 million square feet that are owned by partnerships and accounted for using the equity method of accounting. As of December 31, 2001, our commercial real estate development and services segment had interests in 20 operating properties with 2.4 million total rentable square feet in service, including five buildings, totaling 0.9 million square feet, that are owned by

35


 

partnerships and accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The overall leased percentage decreased to 78% at December 31, 2002, compared to 84% at December 31, 2001. Millennia Park One experienced a decrease in leased percentage due to tenant bankruptcies. Additionally, we were still in the process of procuring tenants for SouthWood Office One, a new speculative building. Two properties totaling approximately 0.2 million square feet of office space were in predevelopment or under construction as of December 31, 2002.

      Information about commercial income producing properties owned or managed by the Company, along with results of operations for 2002 and 2001, is presented in the tables below.

                                                                                 
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Year Ended December 31, 2001


Pre-tax Pre-tax
Rental Operating NOI Adjustments Income Rental Operating NOI Adjustments Income
Revenues Expenses (a) (b) (Loss) Revenues Expenses (a) (b) (Loss)










(In millions)
Buildings purchased with tax- deferred proceeds:
                                                                               
Harbourside
  $ 2.4     $ 1.0     $ 1.4     $ (1.4 )   $     $ 2.2     $ 0.9     $ 1.3     $ (1.4 )   $ (0.1 )
Prestige Place One and Two
    2.0       1.0       1.0       (1.1 )     (0.1 )     2.3       0.9       1.4       (1.2 )     0.2  
Lakeview
    2.4       1.0       1.4       (1.2 )     0.2       2.2       0.9       1.3       (1.1 )     0.2  
Palm Court
    0.8       0.3       0.5       (0.4 )     0.1       0.9       0.3       0.6       (0.3 )     0.3  
Westside Corporate Center
    1.9       0.8       1.1       (1.0 )     0.1       1.9       0.9       1.0       (0.8 )     0.2  
280 Interstate North
    2.2       0.8       1.4       (1.0 )     0.4       2.2       0.8       1.4       (0.7 )     0.7  
Southhall Center
    3.4       1.3       2.1       (1.6 )     0.5       2.4       0.9       1.5       (0.9 )     0.6  
1133 20th Street
    4.1       1.3       2.8       (2.1 )     0.7       1.2       0.3       0.9       (0.5 )     0.4  
1750 K Street
    5.4       1.7       3.7       (2.5 )     1.2       0.1             0.1             0.1  
Millenia Park One
    1.0       0.5       0.5       (0.6 )     (0.1 )                              
Beckrich Office One
    0.3       0.2       0.1       (0.2 )     (0.1 )                              
5660 New Northside
    0.3             0.3             0.3                                
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Subtotal
  $ 26.2     $ 9.9     $ 16.3     $ (13.1 )   $ 3.2     $ 15.4     $ 5.9     $ 9.5     $ (6.9 )   $ 2.6  
Development property:
                                                                               
Westchase Corporate Center
    3.6       1.6       2.0       (2.1 )     (0.1 )     2.9       1.5       1.4       (2.2 )     (0.8 )
Tree of Life
    1.0       0.4       0.6       (0.6 )                                    
TNT Logistics
    1.1       0.3       0.8       (0.8 )                                    
Nextel Call Center
    0.4       0.1       0.3       (0.4 )     (0.1 )                              
NCCI
                                  1.4             1.4       (0.7 )     0.7  
Other
    0.1       0.4       (0.3 )     (0.4 )     (0.7 )     0.5       1.1       (0.6 )     (0.1 )     (0.7 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Subtotal
  $ 6.2     $ 2.8     $ 3.4     $ (4.3 )   $ (0.9 )   $ 4.8     $ 2.6     $ 2.2     $ (3.0 )   $ (0.8 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total
  $ 32.4     $ 12.7     $ 19.7     $ (17.4 )   $ 2.3     $ 20.2     $ 8.5     $ 11.7     $ (9.9 )   $ 1.8  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 


(a)  NOI is net operating income.
 
(b)  Adjustments include interest expense, depreciation and amortization.

      Realty Revenues. Advantis’ realty revenues increased 4% in 2002 over 2001 due to increases in brokerage and property management revenues, which were partially offset by a decrease in construction revenues. Advantis’ cost of realty revenues increased $0.4 million. A decrease in brokerage related expenses was offset by increases in property management and construction related expenses. Advantis’ expenses included commissions paid to brokers, property management expenses, and construction costs. Advantis’ other operating expenses, which are made up of office administration expenses, were $25.6 million and $26.0 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. Advantis recorded a pre-tax loss of $1.5 million for 2002, compared to a pre-tax loss of $6.5 million for 2001, after excluding profit of $1.3 million in 2002 and $0.9 million in 2001 related to intercompany transactions. The decrease in the net loss primarily resulted from increased revenues and a decrease in depreciation expense. In 2002, the new Advantis management team was in the process of implementing numerous changes and improvements in property management, recruiting and staffing.

36


 

      Real Estate Sales. As discussed above, total proceeds from land sales in 2002 were $11.0 million, with a pre-tax gain of $4.3 million, and total proceeds for building sales were $17.2 million, with a pre-tax gain of $3.1 million.

      During 2001, our commercial real estate development and services segment real estate sales consisted of:

  •  the sale of the NCCI center, a 310,000-square-foot building developed through the Codina Group, Inc. in Boca Raton, Florida, for $52.5 million, a pre-tax gain of approximately $4.4 million,
 
  •  the sales of two Texas properties for combined proceeds of approximately $12.5 million and a pre-tax gain of $0.6 million,
 
  •  the sale of the 160,000-square-foot facility developed through the Codina Group, Inc. for IBM Corporation at Beacon Square in Boca Raton, Florida, for $33.8 million, a pre-tax gain of approximately $5.7 million, and
 
  •  other land sales primarily representing sales of Texas real estate with proceeds of $33.4 million and pre-tax gains of $2.9 million.

      Depreciation and amortization, primarily made up of depreciation on operating properties, was $10.3 million in 2002 compared to $10.0 million in 2001. Goodwill amortization was $2.3 million in 2001. Pursuant to FAS 142, no amortization of goodwill was recorded in 2002.

      Land Sales. The table below sets forth the results of operations of our land sales segment for the three years ended December 31, 2003.

                             
Years Ended December 31,

2003 2002 2001



(In millions)
Real estate sales
  $ 99.2     $ 84.1     $ 76.2  
     
     
     
 
Expenses:
                       
 
Cost of real estate sales
    13.3       9.0       7.8  
 
Cost of other revenues
    0.5       0.2        
 
Other operating expenses
    6.8       6.9       4.8  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    0.2       0.2       0.1  
     
     
     
 
   
Total expenses
    20.8       16.3       12.7  
     
     
     
 
Other income
    0.1       0.3       0.3  
     
     
     
 
Pretax income from continuing operations
  $ 78.5     $ 68.1     $ 63.8  
     
     
     
 

      Land sales activity for 2003, 2002 and 2001, excluding conservation lands, was as follows:

                                         
Number Number of Average Price Gross Gross
Period of Sales Acres Per Acre Sales Price Profit






(In millions) (In millions)
2003
    166       29,904     $ 1,874     $ 56.0     $ 47.6  
2002
    176       28,071     $ 1,820     $ 51.1     $ 44.1  
2001
    128       26,549     $ 1,947     $ 51.7     $ 45.7  

      Conservation land sales activity for 2003, 2002 and 2001 was as follows:

                                         
Number Number of Average Price Gross Gross
Period of Sales Acres Per Acre Sales Price Profit






(In millions) (In millions)
2003
    7       34,999     $ 1,157     $ 40.5     $ 36.7  
2002
    7       16,512     $ 1,999     $ 33.0     $ 30.5  
2001
    5       18,070     $ 1,351     $ 24.4     $ 22.7  

37


 

      RiverCamps was a new product in 2003 and therefore had no sales in 2002 and 2001. RiverCamps generated $2.0 million in revenues in 2003 with $1.8 million in related costs.

      Land sales for 2003 included the sale of the 2003 HGTV Dream Home, located on East Bay in Bay County, Florida. This sale generated revenue of $0.7 million with related costs of $0.7 million.

      We are managing our inventory of land to be sold for long-term value maximization. The vast majority of the holdings marketed by our land sales segment will continue to be managed as timberlands until sold. Additionally, no assurance can be given that conservation land sales will continue at historical levels because of potential declines in government spending on acquisition of conservation lands.

      Forestry. The table below sets forth the results of operations of our forestry segment for the three years ended December 31, 2003.

                             
Years Ended December 31,

2003 2002 2001



(In millions)
Revenues:
                       
 
Timber sales
  $ 36.6     $ 40.7     $ 37.0  
 
Real estate sales
          0.6       0.3  
     
     
     
 
   
Total revenues
    36.6       41.3       37.3  
     
     
     
 
Expenses:
                       
 
Cost of timber sales
    24.2       28.9       24.3  
 
Cost of real estate sales
          0.2       0.1  
 
Other operating expenses
    2.6       2.6       2.0  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    4.1       4.1       3.9  
     
     
     
 
   
Total expenses
    30.9       35.8       30.3  
     
     
     
 
Other income
    2.4       2.5       2.1  
     
     
     
 
Pretax income from continuing operations
  $ 8.1     $ 8.0     $ 9.1  
     
     
     
 

      On June 20, 2001, we purchased Sunshine State Cypress, a cypress sawmill and mulch processing plant located in Liberty County, Florida, for $5.5 million in cash and the assumption of $5.8 million in debt.

      Revenues for the forestry segment in 2003 decreased 11% compared to 2002. Revenues in 2002 increased 11% compared to 2001. Total sales under our fiber agreement with Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation were $11.8 million (677,000 tons) in 2003, $12.2 million (686,000 tons) in 2002, and $14.3 million (709,000 tons) in 2001. Sales to other customers totaled $16.2 million (837,000 tons) in 2003, $18.3 million (782,000 tons) in 2002, and $20.5 million (853,000 tons) in 2001. The 2003 decrease in revenues under the fiber agreement was primarily due to the sales of higher priced wood chips in 2002 with no such sales in 2003. The 2002 decrease was due to decreasing prices under the terms of the fiber agreement and a decrease in volume. The 2003 decrease in revenues from sales to other customers was due to a change in the product mix. The 2002 decrease was due to a decrease in prices and volume resulting from unfavorable market conditions. Revenues from the cypress mill operation, which was acquired in the second quarter of 2001, were $8.5 million in 2003, $10.2 million in 2002, and $2.1 million in 2001. The forestry segment recorded no revenues from land sales in 2003, compared to revenues from land sales of $0.6 million in 2002 with related cost of sales of $0.2 million, and $0.4 million in 2001 with related cost of sales of $0.1 million.

      Cost of timber sales decreased $4.7 million in 2003 and increased $4.6 million in 2002. Cost of sales as a percentage of revenue was 66% in 2003, 71% in 2002, and 66% in 2001. The 2003 decrease in cost of sales was primarily due to changes in the product mix. The 2002 increase in cost of sales was primarily due to a higher cost of sales of the cypress operation. Cost of sales for the cypress mill operation were

38


 

$7.4 million, or 87% of revenue, in 2003, $8.8 million, or 86% of revenue, in 2002, and $2.1 million, or 100% of revenue, in 2001. Cost of sales for timber was $16.8 million, or 60% of revenue, in 2003, $20.1 million, or 66% of revenue, in 2002, and $22.2 million, or 64% or revenue, in 2001. Other operating expenses were $2.6 million in 2003 and in 2002 and $2.0 million in 2001.

      Over the short-term, we expect prices for timber to remain steady or improve.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

      We generate cash from:

  •  Operations;
 
  •  Sales of land holdings, other assets and subsidiaries;
 
  •  Borrowings from financial institutions and other debt; and
 
  •  Issuances of equity, primarily from the exercise of employee stock options.

      We use cash for:

  •  Operations;
 
  •  Real estate development;
 
  •  Construction and homebuilding;
 
  •  Repurchases of our common stock;
 
  •  Payments of dividends;
 
  •  Repayments of debt; and
 
  •  Investments in joint ventures and acquisitions.

      Management believes that our financial condition is strong and that our cash, real estate and other assets, operating cash flows, and borrowing capacity, taken together, provide adequate resources to fund ongoing operating requirements and future capital expenditures related to the expansion of existing businesses, including the continued investment in real estate developments. If our liquidity is not adequate to fund operating requirements, capital development, stock repurchases and dividends, we have various alternatives to change our cash flow, including eliminating or reducing our stock repurchase program, eliminating or reducing dividends, altering the timing of our development projects and/or selling existing assets.

 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities

      Net cash provided by operations in 2003, 2002 and 2001 were $126.4 million, $109.4 million, and $100.8 million, respectively. During such periods, expenditures relating to our community development segment were $342.5 million, $272.5 million, and $229.5 million, respectively. Other expenditures for operating properties in 2003, 2002 and 2001 totaled $43.1 million, $38.9 million and 110.3 million, respectively, and were made up of commercial property development and residential club and resort property development.

      The expenditures for operating activities relating to our community development and commercial development and services segments are primarily for site infrastructure development, general amenity construction and construction of homes and commercial space. Approximately one-half of these expenditures are for home construction and generally take place after the signing of a binding contract with a buyer to purchase the home following construction. As a consequence, if contract activity slows, home construction will similarly slow. We expect this general expenditure level and relationship between expenditures and housing contracts to continue in the future.

39


 

 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities

      Net cash used in investing activities in 2003 was $116.5 million and included $93.4 million for the purchase of four commercial buildings and related intangible assets. In 2002, net cash provided by investing activities was $48.9 million and included proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations of $138.7 million and $65.4 million for the purchase of commercial buildings. In 2001, net cash used in investing activities was $123.4 million and included $98.0 million for the purchase of commercial buildings.

      The purchase of commercial buildings, comprising the majority of the cash used in investing activities, generally follow the sale of real estate, principally land sales and commercial sales on a tax deferred basis which requires the reinvestment of proceeds over a required time frame. As a consequence, if sales activity slows, the purchase activity will also slow. We expect this relationship to continue going forward.

 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities

      In 2003 and 2002, net cash used in financing activities was $25.8 million and $126.0 million, respectively. In 2001, net cash provided by financing activities was $11.9 million.

      We have approximately $76 million of debt maturing in 2004. We expect to spend $125 million to $175 million for the repurchase of shares, the acquisition of surrendered shares and dividend payments in 2004.

      We secured borrowings, collateralized by our commercial property, of $26.0 million during 2002 and $72.2 million during 2001. No such borrowings originated in 2003.

      On February 7, 2002, we issued a series of senior notes with an aggregate principal amount of $175.0 million in a private placement. The notes range in maturity from three to ten years and bear fixed rates of interest ranging from 5.64% to 7.37%, depending upon maturity. Interest on the notes is payable semiannually. The net proceeds of the notes were used to pay down our revolving credit facility. The senior notes include financial performance covenants relating to our leverage position, fixed charge coverage, and a minimum net worth requirement. Management believes that we are currently in compliance with the covenants.

      We have a $250 million revolving credit facility, which matures on March 30, 2005, and can be used for general corporate purposes. The credit facility includes financial performance covenants relating to our leverage position, interest coverage and a minimum net worth requirement. The credit facility also has negative pledge restrictions. Management believes that we are currently in compliance with the covenants of the credit facility. At December 31, 2003, the outstanding balance was $40.0 million. At December 31, 2002, there was no balance outstanding. During 2003, we borrowed $40.0 million on the credit line, net of repayments. During 2001, we borrowed $90.0 million on the credit line, net of repayments.

      We have used community development district (“CDD”) bonds to finance the construction of on-site infrastructure improvements at four of our projects. The principal and interest payments on the bonds are paid by assessments on, or from sales proceeds of, the properties benefited by the improvements financed by the bonds. We record a liability for future assessments which are fixed or determinable and will be levied against our properties. At December 31, 2003, CDD bonds totaling $99.5 million had been issued, of which $79.0 million had been expended. At December 31, 2002, CDD bonds totaling $83.5 million had been issued, of which $49.4 million had been expended. At December 31, 2001, CDD bonds totaling $33.5 million had been issued, of which $18.9 million had been expended. In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 91-10, “Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment Financing,” we have recorded $30.0 million and $11.3 million of these obligations as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

      Through December 31, 2003, our Board of Directors had authorized, through a series of four specific authorizations ranging from $150 million to $200 million, a total of $650.0 million for the repurchase of our outstanding common stock from time to time on the open market (the “Stock Repurchase Program”), of which $43.2 million remained available at December 31, 2003. In February 2004, the Board authorized an additional $150.0 million for the Stock Repurchase Program.

40


 

      Beginning in December 2000 for an initial 90-day term and for additional 90-day terms from time to time (currently through May 7, 2004), the Alfred I. duPont Testamentary Trust, our largest shareholder, and the Trust’s beneficiary, The Nemours Foundation, have agreed to participate in the Stock Repurchase Program. Pursuant to the most recent agreement, effective February 6, 2004, the Trust and/or the Foundation will sell to us each Monday a number of shares equal to 0.46 times the number of shares we purchased from the public during the previous week, if any, at a price equal to the volume weighted average price, excluding commissions, paid for the shares purchased from the public during that week. However, the Trust and the Foundation are not required to sell shares to us if the volume weighted average price of shares repurchased from the public during that prior week is below $37.00 per share.

      From the inception of the Stock Repurchase Program through December 31, 2003, we had repurchased 16,057,866 shares on the open market and 7,672,980 shares from the Trust and the Foundation. During the year ended December 31, 2003, 1,469,800 shares were repurchased on the open market and 1,085,374 shares were purchased from the Trust and the Foundation. In addition, 812,802 shares were surrendered by company executives in payment of the strike price and taxes due on exercised stock options and taxes due on vested restricted stock. During the year ended December 31, 2002, 2,583,700 shares were repurchased on the open market, 2,586,206 shares were purchased from the Trust and the Foundation, and executives surrendered 256,729 shares of our stock in payment of the strike price and taxes due on exercised stock options and taxes due on vested restricted stock. Through December 31, 2003, a total of $606.8 million has been expended as part of the Stock Repurchase Program, including $77.3 million in 2003, $150.3 million in 2002, and $174.7 million in 2001.

      The Company’s board of directors authorized a quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $0.12 per share, payable on March 31, 2004, to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 15, 2004.

 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

      We have entered into partnerships and joint ventures with unrelated third parties to develop or manage real estate projects and services. At December 31, 2003, three of these partnerships had debt outstanding totaling $16.2 million. The maximum amount of the debt we guaranteed is $17.1 million. We are wholly or jointly and severally liable as guarantor on these credit obligations. Certain partners in these partnerships have indemnified us for a portion of the guaranteed debt. We believe that future contributions, if required, will not have a significant impact on our liquidity or financial position.

     Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

December 31, 2003

                                         
Payments Due by Period

Less Than After
Contractual Cash Obligations Total 1 Year 1-3 Years 4-5 Years 5 Years






(In thousands)
Debt
  $ 382,176     $ 76,379     $ 23,468     $ 144,421     $ 137,908  
Operating leases
    15,614       5,251       7,926       2,403       34  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total contractual cash obligations
  $ 397,790     $ 81,630     $ 31,394     $ 146,824     $ 137,942  
     
     
     
     
     
 
                                         
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period

Total Amounts Less Than
Other Commercial Commitments Committed 1 Year 1-3 Years 4-5 Years Thereafter






(In thousands)
Guarantees
  $ 16,230     $ 6,730     $     $     $ 9,500  
Surety bonds
    19,565       18,555       1,010              
Standby letters of credit
    21,602       14,132       7,470              
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total commercial commitments
  $ 57,397     $ 39,417     $ 8,480     $     $ 9,500  
     
     
     
     
     
 

      We do not expect to have to fund the Pension Plan in the foreseeable future, unless market conditions deteriorate significantly.

41


 

Item 7A.     Market Risk

      Our primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk related to our long-term debt. As of December 31, 2003, $40.0 million was outstanding under our $250 million credit facility, which matures on March 30, 2005. This debt accrues interest at different rates based on timing of the loan and our preferences, but generally will be either the one, two, three or six month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a LIBOR margin in effect at the time of the loan. This loan potentially subjects us to interest rate risk relating to the change in the LIBOR rates. We manage our interest rate exposure by monitoring the effects of market changes in interest rates. If LIBOR had been 100 basis points higher or lower, the effect on net income with respect to interest expense on the $250 million credit facility would have been a respective decrease or increase in the amount of $0.2 million pre-tax ($0.1 million net of tax).

Quantitative Disclosures

      The table below presents principal amounts and related weighted average interest rates by year of maturity for our long-term debt. The weighted average interest rates for our fixed-rate long-term debt are based on the actual rates as of December 31, 2003. Weighted average variable rates are based on implied forward rates in the yield curve at December 31, 2003.

Expected Contractual Maturities

                                                                     
Fair
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Thereafter Total Value








($ in thousands)
Long-term Debt
                                                               
 
Fixed Rate
    3,797       20,422       3,045       69,070       69,204       137,908       303,446       323,128  
   
Wtd. Avg. Interest Rate
    7.0 %     5.8 %     6.8 %     6.6 %     7.3 %     7.2 %     7.0 %        
 
Variable Rate
    72,582       1             1,151       4,996             78,730       78,730  
   
Wtd. Avg. Interest Rate
    2.1 %     5.9 %           1.6 %     1.5 %           2.1 %        

      Management estimates the fair value of long-term debt based on current rates available to us for loans of the same remaining maturities. As the table incorporates only those exposures that exist as of December 31, 2003, it does not consider exposures or positions that could arise after that date. As a result, our ultimate realized gain or loss will depend on future changes in interest rate and market values.

Item 8.     Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

      The Financial Statements in pages F-2 to F-30 and the Independent Auditors’ Report on page F-1 are filed as part of this Report and incorporated by reference hereto.

 
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

      None.

Item 9A.     Controls and Procedures

      (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in bringing to their attention on a timely basis material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic filings under the Exchange Act.

42


 

      (b) Changes in Internal Controls. During the quarter ended December 31, 2003, there have not been any changes in our internal controls that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

PART III

 
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

      Information concerning our directors, nominees for director and executive officers and our code of conduct is described in our proxy statement relating to our 2004 annual meeting of shareholders to be held on May 18, 2004. This information is incorporated by reference.

 
Item 11. Executive Compensation

      Information concerning compensation of our executive officers for the year ended December 31, 2003, is presented under the caption “Executive Compensation and Other Information” in our proxy statement. This information is incorporated by reference.

 
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

  •  Information concerning the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and of management is set forth under the caption “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners, Directors and Executive Officers” in our proxy statement and is incorporated by reference.
 
  •  Information concerning compliance with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is set forth under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our proxy statement and is incorporated by reference.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

      Our shareholders have approved all our equity compensation plans. These plans are designed to further align our directors’ and management’s interests with the Company’s long-term performance and the long-term interests of our shareholders.

      The following table summarizes the number of shares of our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2003:

                         
Number of Securities
Number of Securities Remaining Available for
to be Issued Weighted-Average Future Issuance Under
Upon Exercise of Exercise Price of Equity Compensation Plans
Outstanding Options, Outstanding Options, (Excluding Securities Reflected
Plan Category Warrants and Rights Warrants and Rights in the First Column)




Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
    4,207,351     $ 21.95       1,440,887  
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
    0       0       0  
     
     
     
 
Total
    4,207,351     $ 21.95       1,440,887  
     
     
     
 
 
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

      Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions during 2003 is set forth under the caption “Certain Transactions” in our proxy statement. This information is incorporated by reference.

43


 

 
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

      Information concerning our independent auditors is presented under the caption “Audit Committee Information” in our proxy statement and is incorporated by reference.

PART IV

 
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule and Reports on Form 8-K

      (a)(1) Financial Statements

        The financial statements listed in the accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule and Independent Auditors’ Report are filed as part of this Report.

      (2) Financial Statement Schedule

        The financial statement schedule and Independent Auditors’ Report listed in the accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule are filed as part of this Report.

      (3) Exhibits

        The exhibits listed on the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed as part of this Report.

      (b) Reports on Form 8-K

        (1) We filed Reports on Form 8-K on October 21, 2003 and November 4, 2003 furnishing copies of press releases relating to our financial results for the period ended September 30, 2003.
 
        (2) We filed a Report on Form 8-K on October 22, 2003, as amended on November 4, 2003, furnishing supplemental information for the period ended September 30, 2003.

      All other schedules have been omitted since the required information is not present or not present in amounts sufficient to require submission on the schedule or because the information required is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

44


 

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

         
Exhibit
Number Description


  3 .1   Restated and Amended Articles of Incorporation dated May 12, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  3 .2   Amended and Restated By-laws of the registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.01 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 (File No. 1-10466)).
  4 .1   Registration Rights Agreement between the registrant and the Alfred I. duPont Testamentary Trust, dated December 16, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.01 to the registrant’s Amendment No. 1 to the registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-42397)).
  4 .2   Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Rights Agreement between the Alfred I. duPont Testamentary Trust and the registrant, dated January 26, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  4 .3   Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Rights Agreement between the Alfred I. duPont Testamentary Trust and the registrant, dated May 24, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  4 .4   Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Rights Agreement between the Alfred I. duPont Testamentary Trust and the registrant dated September 5, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-108292)).
  4 .5   Amendment No. 4 to the Registration Rights Agreement between the Alfred I. duPont Testamentary Trust and the registrant dated December 30, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-111658)).
  10 .1   Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of February 7, 2002, among the registrant, First Union National Bank, as agent, and the lenders party thereto.
  10 .2   First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of May 7, 2003, among the registrant, Wachovia Bank, National Association (formerly known as First Union National Bank), as agent, and the lenders party thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.02 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-10466)).
  10 .3   Second Amendment to Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of July 10, 2003 among the registrant, Wachovia Bank, National Association (formerly known as First Union National Bank), as agent, and the lenders party thereto.
  10 .4   Employment Agreement between the registrant and Peter S. Rummell dated August 19, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 1-10466)).
  10 .5   Employment Agreement between the registrant and Kevin M. Twomey dated August 19, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 1-10466)).
  10 .6   Agreement between the registrant and the Alfred I. duPont Testamentary Trust dated November 6, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 1-10466)).
  10 .7   Severance Agreement between Christine M. Marx and the registrant dated as of March 24, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.04 to the registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (File No. 1-10466)).
  10 .8   Employment Agreement of Robert M. Rhodes, dated November 3, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.03 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-42397)).
  10 .9   Form of Severance Agreement for Messrs. Regan and Ray (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.07 to the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-42397)).
  10 .10   Long-term Incentive Compensation Agreement of Robert M. Rhodes, dated as of August 21, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 (File No. 1-10466)).

45


 

         
Exhibit
Number Description


  10 .11   Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, dated December 28, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .12   Deferred Capital Accumulation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .13   1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, dated November 30, 1999 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .14   Amendment to the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .15   Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .16   Employment Agreement of Jerry M. Ray, dated October 22, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .17   Employment Agreement of Michael N. Regan, dated November 3, 1997 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .18   Amended and Restated Severance Agreement of Robert M. Rhodes, dated August 21, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .19   1997 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .20   1998 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .21   1999 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .22   2001 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the registrant’s registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-89146)).
  10 .23   Form of Stock Option Agreement.
  10 .24   Form of Restricted Stock Agreement-Bonus Award.
  10 .25   Note Purchase Agreement dated as of February 7, 2002, among the registrant and the purchasers party thereto ($175 million Senior Secured Notes).
  21 .1   Subsidiaries of The St. Joe Company.
  23 .1   Consent of KPMG LLP, independent auditors for the registrant.
  31 .1   Certification by Chief Executive Officer.
  31 .2   Certification by Chief Financial Officer.
  32 .1   Certification by Chief Executive Officer.
  32 .2   Certification by Chief Financial Officer.

46


 

SIGNATURES

      Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned authorized representative.

  THE ST. JOE COMPANY

  By:  /s/ KEVIN M. TWOMEY
 
  Kevin M. Twomey
  President, Chief Operating Officer
  and Chief Financial Officer
  (Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: March 12, 2004

      Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and dates indicated.

             
Signature Title Date



 
/s/ PETER S. RUMMELL

Peter S. Rummell
  Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
  March 12, 2004
 
/s/ KEVIN M. TWOMEY

Kevin M. Twomey
  President, Chief Operating Officer
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
  March 12, 2004
 
/s/ MICHAEL N. REGAN

Michael N. Regan
  Senior Vice President —
Finance and Planning
(Principal Accounting Officer)
  March 12, 2004
 
/s/ MICHAEL L. AINSLIE

Michael L. Ainslie
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
/s/ HUGH M. DURDEN

Hugh M. Durden
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
/s/ DELORES KESLER

Delores Kesler
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
/s/ JOHN S. LORD

John S. Lord
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
/s/ WALTER L. REVELL

Walter L. Revell
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
 

Frank S. Shaw, Jr.
  Director    

47


 

             
Signature Title Date



 
/s/ WINFRED L. THORNTON

Winfred L. Thornton
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
/s/ JOHN D. UIBLE

John D. Uible
  Director   March 12, 2004
 
/s/ WILLIAM H. WALTON, III

William H. Walton, III
  Director   March 12, 2004

48


 

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

Annual Financial Statements
           
Item 15(a)(1) and (2)
       
 
Independent Auditors’ Report
    F-1  
 
Consolidated Balance Sheets
    F-2  
 
Consolidated Statements of Income
    F-3  
 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
    F-5  
 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow
    F-6  
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
    F-7  
 
Independent Auditors’ Report — Financial Statement Schedule
    S-1  
 
Schedule III — Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation
    S-2  

49


 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

The St. Joe Company:

      We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of The St. Joe Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flow for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

      We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

      In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The St. Joe Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

      As discussed in note 2 to the financial statements, The St. Joe Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” effective January 1, 2002.

KPMG LLP

Jacksonville, Florida

March 11, 2004

F-1


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

                 
December 31,

2003 2002


(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Investment in real estate
  $ 886,076     $ 806,701  
Cash and cash equivalents
    57,403       73,273  
Accounts receivable, net
    75,692       48,583  
Prepaid pension asset
    91,768       90,990  
Property, plant and equipment, net
    36,272       42,907  
Goodwill, net
    48,721       53,074  
Intangible assets, net
    37,795       2,164  
Other assets
    42,003       52,195  
     
     
 
    $ 1,275,730     $ 1,169,887  
     
     
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
               
Debt
  $ 382,176     $ 320,915  
Accounts payable
    60,343       46,409  
Accrued liabilities
    105,524       104,806  
Deferred income taxes
    232,184       212,017  
     
     
 
Total liabilities
    780,227       684,147  
Minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries
    8,188       5,647  
 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
               
Common stock, no par value; 180,000,000 shares authorized; 100,824,269 and 97,430,600 issued at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively
    199,787       122,709  
Retained earnings
    944,000       892,622  
Restricted stock deferred compensation
    (18,807 )     (512 )
Treasury stock at cost, 24,794,178 and 21,426,202 shares held at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively
    (637,665 )     (534,726 )
     
     
 
Total stockholders’ equity
    487,315       480,093  
     
     
 
    $ 1,275,730     $ 1,169,887  
     
     
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

                             
Years Ended December 31,

2003 2002 2001



(Dollars in thousands except
per share amounts)
Revenues:
                       
 
Real estate sales
  $ 592,211     $ 484,026     $ 443,985  
 
Realty revenues
    62,525       58,534       55,964  
 
Timber sales
    36,552       40,727       36,985  
 
Rental revenues
    40,812       33,163       20,854  
 
Other revenues
    28,530       18,962       9,220  
     
     
     
 
   
Total revenues
    760,630       635,412       567,008  
     
     
     
 
Expenses:
                       
 
Cost of real estate sales
    353,225       290,816       298,712  
 
Cost of realty revenues
    36,218       33,171       32,801  
 
Cost of timber sales
    24,212       28,853       24,312  
 
Cost of rental revenues
    17,728       14,522       9,742  
 
Cost of other revenues
    27,235       23,060       9,446  
 
Other operating expenses
    91,691       84,206       74,480  
 
Corporate expense, net
    34,467       27,528       18,793  
 
Depreciation and amortization
    31,504       22,780       21,326  
 
Impairment losses
    14,359             500  
     
     
     
 
   
Total expenses
    630,639       524,936       490,112  
     
     
     
 
   
Operating profit
    129,991       110,476       76,896  
     
     
     
 
Other income (expense):
                       
 
Investment income, net
    884       2,932       5,122  
 
Interest expense
    (12,515 )     (16,978 )     (17,335 )
 
Gain on settlement of forward sale contracts
          132,915        
 
Other, net
    2,902       1,779       6,367  
     
     
     
 
   
Total other income (expense)
    (8,729 )     120,648       (5,846 )
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations before equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated affiliates, income taxes, and minority interest
    121,262       231,124       71,050  
Equity in (loss) income of unconsolidated affiliates
    (2,168 )     10,940       24,126  
Income tax expense (benefit):
                       
 
Current
    6,388       (180 )     (6,118 )
 
Deferred
    36,238       89,741       41,559  
     
     
     
 
   
Total income tax expense
    42,626       89,561       35,441  
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations before minority interest
    76,468       152,503       59,735  
Minority interest
    553       1,366       524  
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations
    75,915       151,137       59,211  
     
     
     
 
Discontinued operations:
                       
 
Income from discontinued operations (net of income taxes of $1,469 and $6,904)
          2,339       10,994  
 
Gain on sales of discontinued operations (net of income taxes of $13,110)
          20,887        
     
     
     
 
   
Total discontinued operations
          23,226       10,994  
     
     
     
 
   
Net income
  $ 75,915     $ 174,363     $ 70,205  
     
     
     
 

F-3


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

                           
Years Ended December 31,

2003 2002 2001



(Dollars in thousands except
per share amounts)
EARNINGS PER SHARE
                       
Basic
                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 1.00     $ 1.93     $ 0.73  
Income from discontinued operations
          0.03       0.14  
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
          0.26        
     
     
     
 
 
Net income
  $ 1.00     $ 2.22     $ 0.87  
     
     
     
 
Diluted
                       
Income from continuing operations
  $ 0.98     $ 1.85     $ 0.70  
Income from discontinued operations
          0.03       0.13  
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
          0.26        
     
     
     
 
 
Net income
  $ 0.98     $ 2.14     $ 0.83  
     
     
     
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

                                                           
Common Stock Accumulated Other Restricted Stock

Retained Comprehensive Deferred Treasury
Shares Amount Earnings Income Compensation Stock Total







(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance at December 31, 2000
    83,926,292     $ 31,181     $ 661,500     $ 78,129     $ (2,257 )   $ (199,469 )   $ 569,084  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
 
Net income
                70,205                         70,205  
 
Transition adjustment for derivative instruments, net of tax of $5,389
                      10,008                   10,008  
                                                     
 
Total comprehensive income
                                        80,213  
                                                     
 
Dividends ($.08 per share)
                (6,873 )                       (6,873 )
Issuances of common stock
    2,713,166       40,161                               40,161  
Tax benefit on exercises of stock options
          11,812                               11,812  
Amortization of restricted stock deferred compensation
                            1,306             1,306  
Purchases of treasury shares
    (7,129,850 )                             (177,630 )     (177,630 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Balance at December 31, 2001
    79,509,608     $ 83,154     $ 724,832     $ 88,137     $ (951 )   $ (377,099 )   $ 518,073  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
 
Net income
                174,363                         174,363  
 
Reversal of unrealized gain on settlement of forward sale contracts
                      (88,137 )                 (88,137 )
                                                     
 
Total comprehensive income
                                        86,226  
                                                     
 
Dividends ($.08 per share)
                (6,573 )                       (6,573 )
Issuances of common stock
    1,877,443       30,877                               30,877  
Tax benefit on exercises of stock options
          8,678                               8,678  
Amortization of restricted stock deferred compensation
                            439             439  
Purchases of treasury shares
    (5,382,653 )                             (157,627 )     (157,627 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Balance at December 31, 2002
    76,004,398     $ 122,709     $ 892,622     $     $ (512 )   $ (534,726 )   $ 480,093  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
 
Net income
                75,915                         75,915  
                                                     
 
Total comprehensive income
                                        75,915  
                                                     
 
Issuances of restricted stock
    609,251       20,995                   (20,995 )            
Dividends ($.32 per share)
                (24,537 )                       (24,537 )
Issuances of common stock
    2,784,418       40,398                               40,398  
Tax benefit on exercises of stock options
          15,685                               15,685  
Amortization of restricted stock deferred compensation
                            2,700             2,700  
Purchases of treasury shares
    (3,367,976 )                             (102,939 )     (102,939 )
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
Balance at December 31, 2003
    76,030,091     $ 199,787     $ 944,000     $     $ (18,807 )   $ (637,665 )   $ 487,315  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

                               
Years Ended December 31,

2003 2002 2001



(Dollars in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
                       
 
Net income
  $ 75,915     $ 174,363     $ 70,205  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
                       
   
Gains on settlement of forward sale contracts
          (132,915 )      
   
Depreciation and amortization
    31,504       23,845       29,619  
   
Imputed interest on long-term debt
          4,292       9,524  
   
Minority interest in income
    553       1,366       524  
   
Equity in loss (income) of unconsolidated joint ventures
    2,168       (10,940 )     (24,126 )
   
Distributions from unconsolidated community residential joint ventures
    16,979       41,363       22,473  
   
Origination of mortgage loans, net of proceeds from sales
          (3,641 )     (32,720 )
   
Proceeds from mortgage warehouse line of credit, net of repayments
          (13,951 )     32,066  
   
Gains on sale of discontinued operations
          (20,887 )      
   
Deferred income tax expense
    36,238       93,449       42,799  
   
Tax benefit on exercise of stock options
    15,685       8,678       11,812  
   
Impairment losses
    14,359             500  
   
Cost of operating properties sold
    354,636       283,170       290,318  
   
Expenditures for operating properties
    (385,639 )     (311,364 )     (339,842 )
   
Loss (gain) on valuation of derivatives
          894       (3,966 )
   
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
                       
     
Accounts receivable
    (27,109 )     (20,835 )     17,990  
     
Other assets and deferred charges
    (5,334 )     (3,499 )     (38,281 )
     
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    10,650       (3,961 )     16,994  
     
Income taxes payable
    (14,190 )           (5,057 )
     
     
     
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 126,415     $ 109,427     $ 100,832  
     
     
     
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
                       
 
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
    (6,909 )     (16,722 )     (15,068 )
 
Purchases of investments in real estate
    (93,379 )     (65,399 )     (97,984 )
 
Purchases of short-term investments, net of maturities and redemptions
    511       2,297       6,530  
 
Investments in joint ventures and purchase business acquisitions, net of cash received
    (23,231 )     (11,710 )     (16,880 )
 
Proceeds from dispositions of assets
    6,540              
 
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations
          138,743        
 
Proceeds from settlement of forward purchase contracts
          1,735        
     
     
     
 
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
  $ (116,468 )   $ 48,944     $ (123,402 )
     
     
     
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
                       
 
Proceeds from revolving credit agreements, net of repayments
    40,000       (210,764 )     83,470  
 
Proceeds from other long-term debt
    34,022       233,689       77,230  
 
Repayments of other long-term debt
    (12,761 )     (15,640 )     (4,453 )
 
Proceeds from exercises of stock options and stock purchase plan
    40,398       30,877       40,161  
 
Dividends paid to stockholders
    (24,537 )     (6,573 )     (6,873 )
 
Treasury stock purchases
    (102,939 )     (157,627 )     (177,630 )
     
     
     
 
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
  $ (25,817 )   $ (126,038 )   $ 11,905  
     
     
     
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (15,870 )     32,333       (10,665 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    73,273       40,940       51,605  
     
     
     
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 57,403     $ 73,273     $ 40,940  
     
     
     
 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001

1.     Nature of Operations

      The St. Joe Company (the “Company”) is a real estate operating company primarily engaged in community residential, resort, and commercial development, along with commercial real estate services and land sales. The Company also has significant interests in timber. While the Company’s real estate operations are in several states throughout the southeast, the majority of the real estate operations, as well as the timber operations, are within the state of Florida. Consequently, the Company’s performance, and particularly that of its real estate operations, is significantly affected by the general health of the Florida economy.

      On April 17, 2002, the Company completed the sale of Arvida Realty Services (“ARS”), its residential real estate services segment. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto reflect ARS as a discontinued operation.

 
Real Estate

      The Company currently conducts its real estate operations in four principal segments: community development, commercial real estate development and services, land sales, and forestry.

      The Company’s community development division develops large-scale, mixed-use communities primarily on land the Company has owned for a long period of time. The Company owns large tracts of land in Northwest Florida, including significant Gulf of Mexico beach frontage and waterfront properties, and in west Florida near Tallahassee, the state capital. The Company also has a 26% limited partner interest in Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P., a limited partnership whose development operations were substantially completed in 2002. There was no material contribution to income in 2003 from Arvida/JMB. The Company conducts its residential homebuilding in North Carolina and South Carolina through Saussy Burbank, Inc. (“Saussy Burbank”), a wholly owned subsidiary.

      The Company’s commercial real estate development and services segment sells developed and undeveloped land and in-service buildings. The commercial real estate development and services segment also generates rental revenue through its portfolio of buildings purchased with tax-deferred proceeds and buildings developed by the Company. In addition, this segment owns and develops commercial properties through several wholly owned subsidiaries and partnership ventures. Through the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Advantis Real Estate Services Inc. (“Advantis”), the Company provides commercial real estate services including brokerage, property management and construction management. The Company is also a partner in several joint ventures that own, develop and manage commercial property in Florida and Georgia.

      The land sales segment markets parcels of land, typically between one and 5,000 acres, from a portion of the Company’s long-held timberlands primarily in Northwest Florida.

 
Forestry

      The forestry segment focuses on the management and harvesting of the Company’s extensive timberland holdings as well as on the ongoing management of lands which may ultimately be used by other divisions of the Company. The Company is the largest private owner of timberlands in Florida. The principal products of the Company’s forestry operations are pine pulpwood and timber products. In addition, the Company owns and operates a cypress sawmill and mulch plant which converts cypress logs into wood products and mulch.

      A significant portion of the wood harvested by the Company is sold under a long-term wood fiber supply agreement with Jefferson Smurfit, also known as the Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation. The

F-7


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

12-year agreement, which ends on June 30, 2012, requires an annual pulpwood volume of 700,000 tons per year that must come from company-owned fee simple lands. At December 31, 2003, approximately 284,000 acres were encumbered, subject to certain restrictions, by this agreement, although the obligation may be transferred to a third party if a parcel is sold.

      The Company also plans to continue to sell some of its timber resources through St. Joe Land.

2.     Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 
Principles of Consolidation

      The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its majority-owned and controlled subsidiaries. The operations of ARS are included in discontinued operations through April 17, 2002, when ARS was sold. Investments in joint ventures and limited partnerships in which the Company does not have majority voting control are accounted for by the equity method. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

 
Revenue Recognition

      Revenues consist primarily of real estate sales, realty revenues (consisting of property and asset management fees, construction management fees, and lease and sales commissions), timber sales, rental revenues, and other revenues (primarily consisting of revenues from club operations).

      Revenues from real estate sales, including sales of residential homes and home sites, land, and commercial buildings, are recognized upon closing of sales contracts in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate” (“FAS 66”). A portion of real estate inventory and estimates for costs to complete are allocated to each housing unit based on the relative sales value of each unit as compared to the sales value of the total project. Revenue for multi-family residences under construction is recognized, in accordance with FAS 66, using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting when (1) construction is beyond a preliminary stage, (2) the buyer is committed to the extent of being unable to require a refund except for nondelivery of the unit, (3) sufficient units have already been sold to assure that the entire property will not revert to rental property, (4) sales price is collectible and (5) aggregate sales proceeds and costs can be reasonably estimated. Revenue is recognized in proportion to the percentage of total costs incurred in relation to estimated total costs. Revenue for multi-family residences is recognized at closing using the full accrual method of accounting if the criteria for using the percentage of completion method are not met before construction is substantially completed.

      Realty revenues from lease and sales commissions are earned when the underlying transactions are closed.

      Real estate service and development fees are recognized in the period in which the services are performed. Rental revenues are recognized as earned, using the straight-line method over the life of the lease. Tenant reimbursements are included in rental revenues.

      Revenues from sales of forestry products are recognized generally on delivery of the product to the customer.

      Other revenues consist of resort and club operations and management and development fees. Such fees are recorded as the services are provided.

F-8


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
Cash and Cash Equivalents

      Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, bank demand accounts, money market accounts, and repurchase agreements having original maturities at acquisition date of 90 days or less.

 
Investment in Real Estate

      Investment in real estate is carried at cost, net of depreciation and timber depletion. Depreciation is computed on straight-line and accelerated methods over the useful lives of the assets ranging from 15 to 40 years. Depletion of timber is determined by the units of production method. An adjustment to depletion is recorded, if necessary, based on the continuous forest inventory analysis prepared every 5 years.

 
Property, Plant and Equipment

      Depreciation is computed using both straight-line and accelerated methods over the useful lives of various assets. Gains and losses on normal retirements of these items are credited or charged to accumulated depreciation.

 
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

      Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (“FAS 141”), and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (“FAS 142”). FAS 141 requires that the purchase method of accounting be used for all business combinations initiated or completed after June 30, 2001. FAS 141 also specifies criteria that must be met by intangible assets acquired in a purchase method business combination in order for them to be recognized and reported apart from goodwill. FAS 142 requires that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives no longer be amortized, but instead be tested for impairment at least annually in accordance with the provisions of FAS 142.

      Through December 31, 2001, goodwill associated with the Company’s business combinations was amortized on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from 10 years to 30 years.

      As a result of FAS 142, the Company ceased amortizing goodwill as of January 1, 2002. In lieu of amortization, FAS 142 requires the Company to perform annual impairment reviews beginning in 2002. The Company has performed all necessary impairment reviews. In 2003, an impairment of Advantis’ goodwill was recorded in the amount of $14.1 million pre-tax, or $8.8 million net of tax. (see note 10)

      The Company allocates the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their respective fair values. Tangible assets include land, buildings, and tenant improvements on an as-if vacant basis. The Company utilizes various estimates, processes and information to determine the respective as-if vacant property values. Estimates of value are made using customary methods, including data from appraisals, comparable sales, discounted cash flow analysis and other methods. Identifiable intangible assets include amounts allocated to acquired leases for above- and below-market lease rates and the value of in-place leases.

      Above- and below-market rate lease values are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the acquired leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for corresponding leases, measured over a period equal to the non-cancelable term of the acquired lease (except in the case of below-market leases for which all renewal options are considered). Above-market and below-market lease values are amortized to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.

F-9


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      In-place lease value consists of a variety of components including, but not necessarily limited to, (i) the value associated with avoiding costs of originating the acquired in-place leases (i.e. the market cost to execute a lease, including leasing commission, legal, and other related costs); (ii) the value associated with lost revenue from existing leases during the re-leasing period; (iii) the value associated with lost revenue related to tenant reimbursable operating costs estimated to be incurred during the re-leasing period (i.e. real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses); and (iv) the value associated with avoided incremental tenant improvement costs or other inducements to secure a tenant lease.

      Further, the value of the customer relationship acquired is considered by management. In-place lease values and customer relationship values are recognized as amortization expense over the remaining estimated occupancy period of the respective tenants.

 
Stock-Based Compensation

      Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“FAS 123”), permits entities to recognize as expense over the vesting period the fair value of all stock-based awards on the date of grant. Alternatively, FAS 123 allows entities to apply the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (“APB 25”), and provide pro forma net income and pro forma earnings per share disclosures for employee stock option grants as if the fair-value based method defined in FAS 123 has been applied. Under APB 25, compensation expense would be recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price.

      In December 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure (“FAS 148”), which requires prominent disclosure in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. As permitted under FAS 148 and FAS 123, the Company has elected to continue to apply the provisions of APB 25 and provide the pro forma disclosure provisions of FAS 148 and FAS 123. Accordingly, no compensation cost has been recognized for its stock options in the consolidated financial statements.

      The Company has four stock incentive plans (the 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan and the 2001 Stock Incentive Plan), whereby awards may be granted to certain employees and non-employee directors of the Company in the form of restricted shares of Company stock or options to purchase Company stock. Awards are discretionary and are determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The total amount of restricted shares and options available for grant under the Company’s four plans were 8.5 million shares, 1.4 million shares, 2.0 million shares, and 3.0 million shares, respectively. The options are exercisable in equal installments on the first anniversaries of the date of grant and expire generally 10 years after date of grant.

      Effective August 19, 2003, the Company granted 303,951 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock to Mr. Rummell, Chairman and CEO of the Company, and 243,161 restricted shares to Mr. Twomey, President, CFO and COO. During 2003, the Company also granted certain members of the executive management team a total of 97,700 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. During 1997, the Company granted Mr. Rummell 201,861 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock and in 1999, the Company granted Mr. Twomey 100,000 restricted shares. On October 9, 2000 the Company distributed to its shareholders all of its equity interest in Florida East Coast Industries, Inc. (“FLA”). On October 10, 2000, the restricted stock grants were amended to adjust the number of unvested shares for the change in value related to the FLA distribution. On that date, Peter Rummell had 80,748 unvested restricted shares and Kevin Twomey had 100,000 unvested restricted shares, which, pursuant to the amendments, were adjusted to 117,644 and 145,694 unvested restricted shares, respectively. All restricted shares vest over three-year and five-year periods, beginning on the date of each grant. The Company

F-10


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

carried deferred compensation of $18.8 million and $0.5 million for the unamortized portions of restricted shares granted as of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Compensation expense related to these grants totaled $2.7 million in 2003. Deferred compensation is being amortized on a straight-line basis over three-to five-year vesting periods, which are deemed to be the period for which services are performed.

      Stock option activity during the period indicated is as follows:

                 
Number of Weighted Average
Shares Exercise Price


Balance at December 31, 2000
    9,947,996     $ 15.65  
Granted
    709,139       26.35  
Forfeited
    (233,648 )     16.78  
Exercised
    (2,596,066 )     15.44  
     
     
 
Balance at December 31, 2001
    7,827,421       16.65  
Granted
    775,000       29.24  
Forfeited
    (284,628 )     18.33  
Exercised
    (1,833,463 )     16.47  
     
     
 
Balance at December 31, 2002
    6,484,330       18.11  
Granted
    573,200       32.20  
Forfeited
    (170,651 )     19.67  
Exercised
    (2,679,528 )     15.16  
     
     
 
Balance at December 31, 2003
    4,207,351     $ 21.95  
     
     
 

      All options were granted at the Company’s then current market price.

      The per share weighted-average fair value of stock options granted/converted during 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively, was $8.97, $12.60, and $12.70 on the date of grant using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions: 2003 — 1.31% expected dividend yield, risk-free interest rate of 3.87%, weighted average expected volatility of 23.1% and an expected life of 7 years; 2002 — 0.3% expected dividend yield, risk-free interest rate of 4.26%, weighted average expected volatility of 24.01% and an expected life of 7.5 years; 2001 — 0.3% expected dividend yield, risk-free interest rate of 5.64%, weighted average expected volatility of 24.64% and an expected life of 7.5 years.

F-11


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Had the Company determined compensation costs based on the fair value at the grant date for its stock options under FAS 123, the Company’s net income would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts):

                         
2003 2002 2001



Net income as reported
  $ 75,915     $ 174,363     $ 70,205  
Add: stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of taxes
    1,724       270       804  
Deduct: total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based methods for all awards, net of taxes
    (7,407 )     (5,304 )     (11,000 )
     
     
     
 
Net income — pro forma
  $ 70,232     $ 169,329     $ 60,009  
     
     
     
 
Per share — Basic:
                       
Earnings per share as reported
  $ 1.00     $ 2.22     $ 0.87  
Earnings per share — pro forma
  $ 0.93     $ 2.16     $ 0.74  
Per share — Diluted:
                       
Earnings per share as reported
  $ 0.98     $ 2.14     $ 0.83  
Earnings per share — pro forma
  $ 0.92     $ 2.10     $ 0.71  

      The following table presents information regarding all options outstanding at December 31, 2003:

                         
Weighted Average Range of Weighted Average
Number of Options Outstanding Remaining Contractual Life Exercise Prices Exercise Price




1,913,335
    4.0 years     $ 13.14-$19.38     $ 14.58  
1,722,816
    7.5 years     $ 19.94-$29.11     $ 26.59  
  571,200
    9.4 years     $ 30.00-$34.77     $ 32.61  

                       
4,207,351
    6.2 years     $ 13.14-$34.77     $ 21.95  

                       

      The following table presents information regarding options exercisable at December 31, 2003:

                 
Range of Weighted Average
Number of Options Exercisable Exercise Prices Exercise Price



1,483,902
  $ 13.14-$19.38     $ 14.07  
  632,238
  $ 19.94-$29.11     $ 25.09  
   10,938
  $ 30.00-$33.26     $ 33.26  

               
2,127,078
  $ 13.14-$33.26     $ 17.45  

               
 
Earnings Per Share

      Earnings per share (“EPS”) is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted EPS assumes weighted average options have been exercised to purchase 1,968,440, 2,903,902, and 3,329,331 shares of common stock in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively, net of assumed repurchases using the treasury stock method.

      In August 2002, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized $150.0 million for the repurchase of the Company’s outstanding common stock from time to time on the open market (the “Stock Repurchase Program”), of which $43.2 million remained unexpended at December 31, 2003. From August 1998 through August 2002, the Board authorized a total of $650.0 million for the Stock Repurchase Program, of which a total of approximately $606.8 million had been expended through December 31, 2003. Beginning

F-12


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

in December 2000 for an initial 90-day term and for additional 90-day terms from time to time (currently through May 7, 2004), the Alfred I. DuPont Testamentary Trust (the “Trust”), the principal shareholder of the Company, and the Trust’s beneficiary, The Nemours Foundation (the “Foundation”), have agreed to participate in the Stock Repurchase Program. Pursuant to the most recent agreement, effective February 10, 2004, the Trust and/or the Foundation will sell to the Company each Monday a number of shares equal to 0.46 times the number of shares the Company purchased from the public during the previous week, if any, at a price equal to the volume weighted average price, excluding commissions, paid by the Company for shares purchased from the public during that week. However, the Trust and the Foundation are not required to sell shares to the Company if the volume weighted average price of shares repurchased from the public during that prior week is below $37.00 per share.

      As of December 31, 2003, the Company had repurchased 16,057,866 shares on the open market and 7,672,980 shares from the Trust and the Foundation since inception of the Stock Repurchase Program. During the year ended December 31, 2003, 1,469,800 shares were repurchased on the open market and 1,085,374 shares were purchased from the Trust and the Foundation. Also during the year ended December 31, 2003, 812,802 shares were surrendered to the Company by executives as payment for the strike price and taxes due on exercised stock options and taxes due on vested restricted stock. During the year ended December 31, 2002, 2,583,700 shares were repurchased on the open market, 2,586,206 shares were purchased from the Trust and the Foundation, and executives surrendered 256,729 shares of Company stock as payment for the strike price and taxes due on exercised stock options and taxes due on vested restricted stock.

      Weighted average basic and diluted shares, taking into consideration shares issued, weighted average options used in calculating EPS and treasury shares repurchased, for each of the years presented are as follows:

                         
2003 2002 2001



Basic
    75,857,350       78,436,713       80,959,416  
Diluted
    77,825,790       81,340,615       84,288,746  
 
Comprehensive Income

      For the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company’s comprehensive income is equal to net income because there was no other comprehensive income. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company’s comprehensive income differs from net income due to changes in the net unrealized gains on investment securities available for sale and derivative instruments. The Company has elected to disclose comprehensive income in its Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity.

 
Income Taxes

      The Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

 
Marketable Securities and Forward Sale Contracts

      Prior to October 15, 2002, the Company owned a portfolio of marketable equity securities and related derivative instruments which, together, were classified as available-for-sale securities. Unrealized gains and

F-13


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

losses, net of related income tax effects, were excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity until realized.

      The forward sale contracts held by the Company were designated as hedges of the fair value of the Company’s marketable securities. Until the final settlement of the Company’s forward sale contracts on October 15, 2002 (see note 7), changes in the intrinsic value of the related derivatives were recorded through the statements of income and offset by changes in the fair value of the hedged marketable securities. Changes in the time value component of the change in fair value were recorded through the statement of income as these amounts were excluded from the Company’s assessment of hedge effectiveness.

 
Long-Lived Assets

      On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets (“FAS 144”). FAS 144 provides guidance on the accounting for long-lived assets to be disposed of. FAS 144 also broadens the scope of discontinued operations.

      The Company’s properties have operations and cash flows that can be clearly distinguished from the rest of the Company. In accordance with FAS 144, beginning in 2002, the operations and gains on sales reported in discontinued operations include operating properties sold during the year for which operations and cash flows can be clearly distinguished. The operations from these properties have been eliminated from ongoing operations and the Company will not have continuing involvement after disposition. Prior periods have been restated to reflect the operations of these properties as discontinued operations. The operations and gains on sales of operating properties for which the Company has some continuing involvement are reported as income from continuing operations.

      The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset.

      During 2003 and 2001, the Company recorded impairment losses on commercial properties of a $0.3 million and $0.5 million, respectively.

 
Reclassifications

      Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation.

 
Supplemental Cash Flow Information

      The Company paid $21.3 million, $17.1 million, and $14.4 million for interest in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. The Company received income tax refunds, net of payments, of $7.4 million in 2003 and paid income taxes, net of refunds received, of $2.0 million and $2.5 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively. The Company capitalized interest expense of $8.9 million, $8.1 million, and $7.0 million in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.

      The Company’s non-cash activities in 2003 and 2002 included the surrender of shares of Company stock by executives of the Company as payment for the exercise of stock options, the tax benefit on exercises of stock options, and the settlement in 2002 of forward sale contracts (see note 7). During the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, executives surrendered Company stock worth $17.0 million and

F-14


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

$4.1 million, respectively, as payment for the strike price of stock options. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company settled forward sale contracts that provided for the sale of a portfolio of marketable securities held by the Company to a third party. In addition to cash received, the Company transferred equity securities with a fair value of $96.6 million to a financial institution and settled the forward sale contracts with a fair market value of $43.3 million to satisfy the debt associated with the forward sale of the equity securities of $135.6 million. (see note 7.)

      Cash flows related to community development and related amenities, sales of undeveloped and developed land sales by the land sales segment, the Company’s timberlands, and land and buildings developed by the Company and used for commercial rental purposes are included in operating activities on the statement of cash flows. Cash flows related to the purchase of the Company’s commercial buildings purchased with tax-deferred proceeds are included in investment activities on the statement of cash flows. Cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 have been reclassified to be consistent with this presentation.

 
Fair Value of Financial Instruments

      The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values due to the short-term nature of these assets and liabilities. The fair value of the Company’s long-term debt, including the current portion, was $401.9 million and $335.9 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Management estimates the fair value of long-term debt based on current rates available to the Company for loans of the same remaining maturities.

 
Estimates

      The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 
Recent Accounting Pronouncements

      In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Accounting Standards No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (“FAS 150”). FAS 150 affects the accounting for certain financial instruments, including requiring companies having consolidated entities with specified termination dates to treat minority owner’s interests in such entities as liabilities in an amount based on the fair value of the entities. Although FAS 150 was originally effective July 1, 2003, the FASB has indefinitely deferred certain provisions related to classification and measurement requirements for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments that become subject to FAS 150 solely as a result of consolidation. As a result, FAS 150 has no impact on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the year ended December 31, 2003. The Company’s two consolidated entities with specified termination dates are Artisan Park, L.L.C. (“Artisan Park”) and Westchase Development Venture, L.C. (“Westchase”). At December 31, 2003, the carrying amounts of the minority interests in Artisan Park and Westchase were $4.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively. The carrying amounts of minority interests in Artisan Park and Westchase approximate their fair value. The Company has no other material financial instruments that are affected currently by FAS 150.

      In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46R (“FIN 46R”), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, to replace Interpretation No. 46 (“FIN 46”) which was issued in January 2003. FIN 46R addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest

F-15


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

in an entity through means other than voting rights and accordingly should consolidate the entity. FIN 46R is applicable immediately to a variable interest entity created after January 31, 2003 and as of the first interim period ending after March 15, 2004 to those variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003 and not already consolidated under FIN 46 in previously issued financial statements. The Company did not create any variable interest entities after January 31, 2003. The Company has analyzed the applicability of this interpretation to its structures created before February 1, 2003 and does not believe its adoption will have a material effect on the results of operations.

3.     Business Combinations

      On July 2, 2003, the Company purchased the 26% interest in St. Joe/ Arvida Company, L.P. (“St. Joe/ Arvida”) that it did not previously own for $20.0 million in cash, including the resolution of a dispute regarding the use of the Arvida name by the Company and its affiliates (see note 4). As a result of this purchase, St. Joe/ Arvida became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. In connection with this purchase, the Company recorded $9.1 million in additional goodwill and $7.0 million in intangible assets representing the fair value of the acquired contractual rights relative to St. Joe/ Arvida.

      During 2003, the Company purchased Crescent Ridge, a commercial building in Charlotte, North Carolina, for $22.5 million. Of the total purchase price, $17.1 million was allocated to investment in real estate and $5.4 million was allocated to lease-related intangible assets. Also during 2003, the Company purchased Windward Plaza, three commercial buildings in Atlanta, Georgia, for $63.5 million. Of the total purchase price, $47.4 million was allocated to investment in real estate and $16.1 million was allocated to lease-related intangible assets.

      During 2001, the Company purchased the remaining interest in a previously 50%-owned homebuilding subsidiary, McNeill Burbank, for $1.1 million. During 2003, the Company accrued additional contingent consideration of $0.3 million related to the McNeill Burbank acquisition which will be paid in 2004.

      These acquisitions were accounted for as purchases and as such, the results of their operations are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. None of the acquisitions were significant to the financial condition and operations of the Company in the year in which they were acquired or the year preceding the acquisition.

4.     Discontinued Operations

      As a result of rapid consolidation in the real estate services business, the Company had the opportunity to sell ARS, its wholly-owned residential real estate services subsidiary, at an attractive value. On April 17, 2002, the Company completed the sale of ARS for a gain of $33.7 million, or $20.7 million net of tax. In connection with the sale, a liability was recorded related to a dispute with an outside party over the use of the Arvida name. Subsequently, the dispute was resolved and the liability was reversed (see note 3). The Company has reported its residential real estate services operations as discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. Revenues from ARS were $76.2 million and $277.3 million for 2002 and 2001, respectively. Net income for ARS was $2.3 million and $11.0 million for 2002 and 2001, respectively.

      Also included in discontinued operations is the sale in 2002 of two commercial office buildings which generated a gain $0.3 million, or $0.2 million net of tax. Revenues from the buildings were less than $0.1 million in 2002 and $0.2 million in 2001. Net operating income from the buildings was less than $0.1 million in 2002 and in 2001.

F-16


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

5.     Investment in Real Estate

      Real estate by segment as of December 31 consists of (in thousands):

                   
2003 2002


Operating property:
               
 
Community development
  $ 74,547     $ 61,801  
 
Land sales
    959       117  
 
Commercial real estate
    94,904       81,444  
 
Forestry
    80,617       89,074  
 
Other
    2,225       815  
     
     
 
Total operating property
    253,252       233,251  
     
     
 
Development property:
               
 
Community development
    262,893       240,725  
 
Land sales
    5,591       4,298  
     
     
 
Total development property
    268,484       245,023  
     
     
 
Investment property:
               
 
Land sales
    167       165  
 
Commercial real estate
    350,456       282,599  
 
Forestry
    981       1,155  
 
Other
    4,802       2,386  
     
     
 
Total investment property
    356,406       286,305  
     
     
 
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates:
               
 
Community development
    22,625       37,873  
 
Commercial real estate
    15,745       21,472  
     
     
 
Total investment in unconsolidated affiliates
    38,370       59,345  
     
     
 
      916,512       823,924  
Less: Accumulated depreciation
    30,436       17,223  
     
     
 
    $ 886,076     $ 806,701  
     
     
 

      Included in operating property are Company-owned amenities related to community developments, the Company’s timberlands and land and buildings developed by the Company and used for commercial rental purposes. Development property consists of community residential land and inventory currently under development to be sold. Investment property includes the Company’s commercial buildings purchased with tax-deferred proceeds and land held for future use.

      Real estate properties having a net book value of approximately $336.5 million at December 31, 2003 are leased under non-cancelable operating leases with expected aggregate rentals of approximately $191.5 million, of which $45.0 million, $37.0 million, $32.7 million, $26.9 million, and $20.8 million is due in the years 2004 through 2008, respectively, and $29.1 million thereafter.

F-17


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

6.     Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates

      Investments in unconsolidated affiliates are included in real estate investments and as of December 31, consist of (in thousands):

                         
Ownership 2003 2002



Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. 
    26%     $ 11,791     $ 25,868  
Codina Group, Inc. 
    50%       10,880       11,228  
355 Alhambra Plaza, Ltd.(a)
                5,639  
Paseos, L.L.C. 
    50%       6,557       7,313  
Rivercrest, L.L.C. 
    50%       4,246       4,693  
Deerfield Commons I, L.L.C. 
    50%       2,473       2,437  
Deerfield Park, L.L.C. 
    38%       2,423       2,140  
Other
    various             27  
             
     
 
            $ 38,370     $ 59,345  
             
     
 


(a)  In 2003, the Company sold its 45% interest in 355 Alhambra Plaza, Ltd. for cash proceeds of $6.3 million, recognizing a pre-tax gain on the sale of $1.0 million. The results for 355 Alhambra, Ltd. are not included in discontinued operations due to the Company’s continuing involvement as the property manager.

      The Company is wholly or jointly and severally liable as guarantor on three credit obligations entered into by partnerships in which the Company has equity interests. At December 31, 2003, the maximum amount of the debt available to these partnerships that is guaranteed by the Company totaled $17.1 million; the amount outstanding at December 31, 2003 totaled $16.2 million. Certain partners in these partnerships have indemnified the Company for a portion of the guaranteed debt. Management believes these guarantees have no significant fair value due to availability of the underlying collateral and the solvency of the partners.

      Summarized financial information for the unconsolidated investments on a combined basis is as follows (in thousands):

                   
2003 2002


BALANCE SHEETS:
               
Investment property, net
  $ 91,203     $ 114,786  
Other assets
    109,584       180,125  
     
     
 
 
Total assets
    200,787       294,911  
     
     
 
Notes payable and other debt
    55,357       86,947  
Other liabilities
    57,479       55,052  
Equity
    87,951       152,912  
     
     
 
 
Total liabilities and equity
  $ 200,787     $ 294,911  
     
     
 
                           
2003 2002 2001



STATEMENTS OF INCOME:
                       
Total revenues
  $ 116,978     $ 310,651     $ 501,681  
Total expenses
    114,821       277,079       401,882  
     
     
     
 
 
Net income
  $ 2,157     $ 33,572     $ 99,799  
     
     
     
 

F-18


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

7.     Marketable Securities and Forward Sale Contracts

      In October 1999, the Company entered into a forward sale transaction with a major financial institution that, in effect, provided for the monetization of its long-held portfolio of equity investments which, at December 31, 1998, had a cost of approximately $1.7 million and a fair value of approximately $144.0 million. Under the forward sale agreement, the Company received approximately $111.1 million in cash and was required to settle the forward transaction by delivering either the securities or the equivalent value of the securities in cash to the financial institution by October 15, 2002. The agreement permitted the Company to retain an amount of the securities that represented appreciation up to 20% of their value on October 15, 1999, should the value of the securities increase. The securities were recorded at fair value on the balance sheet and the related unrealized gain, net of tax, was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company recorded, at the time of entering into the forward sale contracts, a liability in long-term debt of approximately $111.1 million, subject to increase as interest expense was imputed at an annual rate of 7.9%. The liability was also subject to increase by the amount, if any, that the fair value of the securities increased beyond the 20% that the Company retained.

      On February 26, 2002 and October 15, 2002, in two separate transactions, the Company settled its forward sale contracts by delivering equity securities to the financial institution for an aggregate pre-tax gain of $132.9 million. The liability related to the contracts settled in February was $97.0 million at the time of settlement and the resulting gain recognized in the first quarter of 2002 was $94.7 million pre-tax. The liability related to the contracts settled in October was $38.6 million at the time of settlement and the resulting gain recognized in the fourth quarter of 2002 was approximately $38.2 million pre-tax.

      During 2002 and 2001, the change in intrinsic value of the forward sale contracts was recorded through the statement of income, offset by the change in fair value of the underlying securities. The net impact to the statement of income for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 was a loss of $(0.9) million and a gain of $4.0 million, respectively, which was included in other income and represents the time value component of the change in fair value of the forward sale contracts which the Company excluded from its assessment of hedge effectiveness.

8.     Property, Plant and Equipment

      Property, plant and equipment, at cost, as of December 31 consists of (in thousands):

                     
Estimated
2003 2002 Useful Life



(in years)
Transportation property and equipment
  $ 34,074     $ 34,087     12-30
Machinery and equipment
    32,117       32,755     12-30
Office equipment
    15,060       12,995     10
Leasehold improvements
    1,348       1,089     Lease term
Autos, trucks, and airplane
    4,976       4,424     3-10
     
     
     
      87,575       85,350      
Accumulated depreciation
    51,303       42,443      
     
     
     
    $ 36,272     $ 42,907      
     
     
     

F-19


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

9.     Accrued Liabilities

      Accrued liabilities as of December 31 consist of (thousands):

                 
2003 2002


Property, intangible, income and other taxes
  $ 40,613     $ 39,496  
Payroll and benefits
    33,556       30,107  
Accrued interest
    5,130       4,963  
Environmental liabilities
    3,952       4,152  
Contingent purchase price
    280       552  
Other accrued liabilities
    21,993       25,536  
     
     
 
Total accrued liabilities
  $ 105,524     $ 104,806  
     
     
 

10.     Goodwill and Intangible Assets

      On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted FAS 142 and, as a result, the Company ceased amortizing all goodwill. Following is a presentation of net income amounts as if FAS 142 had been applied for the year ended December 31, 2001. Because FAS 142 was applied for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, no adjustment is necessary for those years to reflect reported net income amounts as if FAS 142 had been applied.

           
For the Year Ended
December 31,
2001

(In thousands,
except per share
information)
Reported net income
  $ 70,205  
Add back: Goodwill amortization, net of income taxes
    5,857  
     
 
Adjusted net income
  $ 76,062  
     
 
Basic earnings per share:
       
 
Reported net income
  $ 0.87  
 
Goodwill amortization
    0.07  
     
 
 
Adjusted net income
  $ 0.94  
     
 
Diluted earnings per share:
       
 
Reported net income
  $ 0.83  
 
Goodwill amortization
    0.07  
     
 
 
Adjusted net income
  $ 0.90  
     
 

      Due to the very difficult economic environment for commercial real estate services companies, Advantis’ results of operations declined in the second quarter of 2003. As a result, during 2003 the Company utilized a discounted cash flow method to determine the fair value of Advantis and recorded an impairment loss to reduce the carrying amount of Advantis’ goodwill from $28.9 million to $14.8 million. This resulted in an impairment loss of $14.1 million pre-tax, or $8.8 million net of tax. The Company recorded no goodwill impairment during 2002.

F-20


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2003 are as follows (in thousands):

         
Balance at December 31, 2002
  $ 53,074  
Goodwill acquired with purchase of 26% interest in St. Joe/Arvida
    9,104  
Other additions
    626  
Impairment loss
    (14,083 )
     
 
Balance at December 31, 2003
  $ 48,721  
     
 

      Intangible assets at December 31, 2003 and 2002 consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

                                         
2003 2002 Weighted


Average
Gross Carrying Accumulated Gross Carrying Accumulated Amortization
Amount Amortization Amount Amortization Period





(In years)
In-place lease values
  $ 30,628     $ (2,359 )   $ 2,067     $ (297 )     9  
Above-market rate leases
    3,417       (67 )                 5  
Management contracts
    6,983       (1,131 )                 12  
Other
    377       (53 )     421       (27 )     10  
     
     
     
     
     
 
Total
  $ 41,405     $ (3,610 )   $ 2,488     $ (324 )     9  
     
     
     
     
     
 

      Amortization of intangible assets is recorded in the account in the consolidated statements of income which most properly reflects the nature of the underlying intangible asset as follows: (i) above-market rate lease intangibles are amortized to rental revenue, (ii) in-place lease values are amortized to amortization expense, and (iii) management contracts are amortized to amortization expense. The aggregate amortization of intangible assets for 2003, 2002, and 2001 was $2.4 million, $0.3 million, and less than $0.1 million, respectively.

      The estimated aggregate amortization from intangible assets for each of the next five years is as follows (in thousands):

                 
Rental Amortization
Revenue Expense


2004
  $ 796     $ 5,745  
2005
    758       4,793  
2006
    693       4,237  
2007
    638       3,519  
2008
    390       3,026  

F-21


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
11. Debt

      Debt and credit agreements at December 31, 2003 and 2002 consisted of the following (in thousands):

                 
2003 2002


Medium term notes, interest payable semiannually at 5.64% to 7.37%, due February 7, 2005 - February 7, 2012
  $ 175,000     $ 175,000  
Non-recourse debt, interest payable monthly at 7.05% - 7.67%, secured by mortgages on certain commercial property, due January 1 - April 1, 2012
    82,171       83,404  
Senior revolving credit agreement, interest payable monthly to quarterly at LIBOR + 80 - 120 basis points, matures March 30, 2005
    40,000        
Development loan, interest payable at least quarterly at LIBOR + 122.5 basis points (3.1% at December 31, 2003), secured by certain commercial property, due April 10, 2004
    32,565       28,496  
Recourse debt, interest payable monthly at 6.95%, secured by a commercial building, due September 1, 2008
    18,339       18,656  
Community Development District debt, secured by certain real estate, due May 1, 2005 - May 1, 2034, bearing interest at 1.58% to 7.15%
    29,951       11,304  
Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, variable-rate interest payable quarterly based on the Bond Market Association index (1.45% at December 31, 2003), secured by a letter of credit, due January 1, 2008
    4,000       4,000  
Various secured and unsecured notes and capital leases, bearing interest at various rates
    150       55  
     
     
 
Total debt
  $ 382,176     $ 320,915  
     
     
 

      The aggregate maturities of long-term debt subsequent to December 31, 2003 are as follows; 2004, $76.4 million; 2005, $20.4 million; 2006, $3.0 million; 2007, $70.2 million; 2008, $74.2 million; thereafter, $138.0 million.

      On February 7, 2002, the Company issued a series of senior notes (“Medium-term notes”) in a private placement with an aggregate principal amount of $175.0 million. The maturities of the notes are as follows: 3 Year – $18.0 million, 5 Year – $67.0 million, 7 Year – $15.0 million, 10 Year – $75.0 million. The notes bear fixed rates of interest ranging from 5.64% – 7.37% and interest is payable semiannually.

      The Medium-term notes and the senior revolving credit agreement contain financial covenants, including a minimum net worth requirement of $425.0 million, plus some restrictions on pre-payment. At December 31, 2003, the Company is in compliance with the covenants.

F-22


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
12. Income Taxes

      Total income tax expense for the years ended December 31 was allocated as follows (in thousands):

                         
2003 2002 2001



Income from continuing operations
  $ 42,626     $ 89,561     $ 35,441  
Stockholders’ equity, for recognition of unrealized gain on debt and marketable equity securities
          (47,458 )     5,389  
Gain on the sale of discontinued operations
          13,110        
Earnings from discontinued operations
          1,469       6,904  
Tax benefit on exercise of stock options
    (15,685 )     (8,678 )     (11,812 )
     
     
     
 
    $ 26,941     $ 48,004     $ 35,922  
     
     
     
 

      Income tax expense attributable to income from continuing operations differed from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 35% to pre-tax income as a result of the following (in thousands):

                         
2003 2002 2001



Tax at the statutory federal rate
  $ 41,683     $ 84,722     $ 33,312  
State income taxes (net of federal benefit)
    1,369       5,669       3,176  
Other, net
    (426 )     (830 )     (1,047 )
     
     
     
 
    $ 42,626     $ 89,561     $ 35,441  
     
     
     
 

      The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities as of December 31 are presented below (in thousands):

                     
2003 2002


Deferred tax assets:
               
 
Deferred compensation
  $ 9,477     $ 7,009  
 
Accrued casualty and other reserves
    4,123       5,053  
 
Impairment loss
    9,830       4,573  
 
Charitable contributions carryforward
    2,812       2,557  
 
Net operating loss carryforward
    15,778        
 
Other
    7,403       6,824  
     
     
 
   
Total deferred tax assets
  $ 49,423     $ 26,016  
     
     
 
Deferred tax liabilities:
               
 
Deferred gain on land sales and involuntary conversions
  $ 216,237     $ 173,316  
 
Prepaid pension asset
    34,851       35,741  
 
Income of unconsolidated affiliates
    6,085       9,026  
 
Depreciation
    6,632       6,824  
 
Intangible asset amortization
    450       504  
 
Other
    17,352       12,622  
     
     
 
   
Total gross deferred tax liabilities
    281,607       238,033  
     
     
 
   
Net deferred tax liability
  $ 232,184     $ 212,017  
     
     
 

F-23


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Based on the timing of reversal of future taxable amounts and the Company’s history of reporting taxable income, the Company believes that the deferred tax assets will be realized and a valuation allowance is not considered necessary. There were no significant current deferred tax assets at December 31, 2003 or 2002.

 
13. Employee Benefits Plans

      The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan that covers substantially all of its salaried employees (the “Pension Plan”). The benefits are based on the employees’ years of service, or years of service and compensation, during the last five or ten years of employment. The Company complies with the minimum funding requirements of ERISA. The measurement date of the Pension Plan is January 1, 2003.

      Since the Pension Plan has an overfunded balance, no contributions to the Pension Plan are expected in the near future.

      The weighted average percentages of the fair value of total plan assets by each major type of plan asset are as follows:

                 
Asset Class 2003 2002



Equities
    64 %     55 %
Fixed income including cash equivalents
    35 %     44 %
Timberlands
    1 %     1 %

      The Company’s investment policy is to ensure, over the long-term life of the Pension Plan, an adequate pool of assets to support the benefit obligations to participants, retirees and beneficiaries. In meeting this objective, the Pension Plan seeks the opportunity to achieve an adequate return to fund the obligations in a manner consistent with the fiduciary standards of ERISA and with a prudent level of diversification. Specifically, these objectives include the desire to:

  •  invest assets in a manner such that contributions remain within a reasonable range and future assets are available to fund liabilities
 
  •  maintain liquidity sufficient to pay current benefits when due
 
  •  diversify, over time, among asset classes so assets earn a reasonable return with acceptable risk of capital loss

      The asset strategy established to reflect the growth expectations and risk tolerance is as follows:

           
Asset Class Tactical range


Large Cap Equity
    17%-23%  
Large Cap Value Equity
    10%-16%  
Mid Cap Equity
    4%-8%  
Small Cap Equity
    7%-11%  
International Equity
    9%-15%  
     
 
 
Total equities
    55%-65%  
Fixed Income including cash equivalents
    35%-45%  
Timberlands and other
    0%-1%  

      To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption, the Company considered the current level of expected returns on risk free investments (primarily government bonds), the historical level of the risk premium associated with the other asset classes in which the portfolio is invested and the

F-24


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

expectations for future returns of each asset class. The expected return for each asset class was then weighted based on the target asset allocation to develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption for the portfolio. This resulted in the selection of the 8.5% assumption for 2003.

      A summary of the net periodic pension credit follows (in thousands):

                   
2003 2002


Service cost
  $ 4,777     $ 4,465  
Interest cost
    8,529       8,969  
Expected return on assets
    (17,765 )     (20,308 )
Actuarial gain
          (2,214 )
Prior service costs
    747       721  
Curtailment loss
          377  
     
     
 
 
Total pension income
  $ (3,712 )   $ (7,990 )
     
     
 

      Assumptions used to develop net benefit cost:

                 
2003 2002


Discount rate
    6.5 %     6.5 %
Rate of compensation increase
    4.0 %     4.0 %

      A reconciliation of projected benefit obligation as of December 31 follows (in thousands):

                 
2003 2002


Projected benefit obligation, beginning of year
  $ 135,098     $ 124,498  
Service cost
    4,777       4,465  
Interest cost
    8,529       8,969  
Actuarial loss
    8,863       13,398  
Benefits paid
    (13,123 )     (19,659 )
Plan amendment
    2,331       2,952  
Curtailments
          475  
     
     
 
Projected benefit obligation, end of year
  $ 146,475     $ 135,098  
     
     
 

      Assumptions used to develop end-of period obligations:

                 
2003 2002


Discount rate
    6.0 %     6.5 %
Rate of compensation increase
    4.0 %     4.0 %
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets
    8.5 %     8.5 %

      A reconciliation of plan assets as of December 31 follows (in thousands):

                 
2003 2002


Fair value of assets, beginning of year
  $ 210,831     $ 248,193  
Actual return (loss) on assets
    41,328       (15,682 )
Transfer to retiree medical plan
    (950 )     (900 )
Benefits and expenses paid
    (14,164 )     (20,780 )
     
     
 
Fair value of assets, end of year
  $ 237,045     $ 210,831  
     
     
 

F-25


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      A reconciliation of funded status as of December 31 follows (in thousands):

                 
2003 2002


Accumulated benefit obligation
  $ 136,034     $ 129,032  
 
Projected benefit obligation
  $ 146,475     $ 135,098  
Market value of assets
    237,045       210,831  
Funded status
  $ 90,570     $ 75,733  
Unrecognized prior service costs
    7,082       7,483  
Unrecognized actuarial net (loss) gain
    (5,884 )     7,779  
     
     
 
Prepaid pension asset
  $ 91,768     $ 90,995  
     
     
 

      Had the Company used a measurement date of December 31, 2003, the accumulated benefit obligation as of December 31, 2003 would have been $143.5 million.

      The Company’s Board of Directors approved a partial subsidy to fund certain postretirement medical benefits of currently retired participants, and their beneficiaries, in connection with the previous disposition of several subsidiaries. No such benefits are to be provided to active employees. The Board reviews the subsidy annually and may further modify or eliminate such subsidy at their discretion. The actuarial present value of this unfunded postretirement benefit obligation approximated $21.9 million and $15.7 million at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Postretirement benefit expense approximated $2.3 million, $2.0 million, and $2.0 million for 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively. This actuarially determined obligation was computed based on actual claims experience of this group of retirees and a discount rate of 6.0% and 6.5% for 2003 and 2002, respectively, and an initial medical trend rate of 12.0% and 9.5% in 2003 and 2002, respectively. A 1% increase in the medical cost trend would increase this obligation by $1.9 million at December 31, 2003. A liability of $2.3 million and $1.1 million has been included in accrued liabilities to reflect the Company’s obligation to fund postretirement benefits at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

 
Deferred Compensation Plans and ESPP

      The Company also has other defined contribution plans that cover substantially all its salaried employees. Contributions are at the employees’ discretion and are matched by the Company up to certain limits. Expense for these defined contribution plans was $2.2 million, $1.8 million, and $1.8 million in 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.

      The Company has a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) and a Deferred Capital Accumulation Plan (“DCAP”). The SERP is a non-qualified retirement plan to provide supplemental retirement benefits to certain selected management and highly compensated employees. The DCAP is a non-qualified defined contribution plan to permit certain selected management and highly compensated employees to defer receipt of current compensation. The Company has recorded expense in 2003 and 2002 related to the SERP of $1.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively, and related to the DCAP of $1.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively.

      Beginning in November 1999, the Company also implemented an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”), whereby all employees may purchase the Company’s common stock through payroll deductions at a 15% discount from the fair market value, with an annual limit of $25,000 in purchases per employee. As of December 31, 2003, 110,642 shares of the Company’s stock had been purchased by employees under the ESPP Plan.

F-26


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      During 2001, certain executives of the Company were granted long-term incentive contracts. In connection with a new employment agreement for one of the executives in 2003, the Company paid $2.3 million to the executive and the remaining $2.7 million was forfeited. The Company will record the remaining minimum liability of $1.7 million ratably over the remaining vesting period of two years and will also record an additional liability up to an additional $1.7 million based on changes in the Company’s stock price over the vesting period. The amount recorded as a liability as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 was $1.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively.

 
14.  Segment Information

      The Company conducts primarily all of its business in four reportable operating segments: community development, commercial real estate development and services, land sales, and forestry. The community development segment develops and sells housing units and home sites and manages residential communities. The commercial real estate development and services segment owns, leases, and manages commercial, retail, office and industrial properties throughout the Southeast and sells developed and undeveloped land and buildings. The land sales segment sells parcels of land included in the Company’s vast holdings of timberlands. The forestry segment produces and sells pine pulpwood and timber and cypress products. Prior to the sale of ARS on April 17, 2002, the Company also had a residential real estate services segment which provided real estate brokerage services. The operations of the residential real estate services segment are reflected as discontinued operations.

      The Company uses Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (“EBITDA”) as a supplemental performance measure, along with net income, to report operating results. The Company’s management believes EBITDA is an important metric commonly used by companies in the real estate industry for comparative performance purposes. EBITDA is not a measure of operating results or cash flows from operating activities as defined by generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Additionally, EBITDA is not necessarily indicative of cash available to fund cash needs and should not be considered an alternative to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. However, management believes that EBITDA provides relevant information about the Company’s operations and, along with net income, is useful in understanding the Company’s operating results.

      Certain amounts in prior year EBITDA have been changed to conform to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s current guidance on non-GAAP financial measures.

      The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Total revenues represent sales to unaffiliated customers, as reported in the Company’s consolidated income statements. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The caption entitled “Other” consists of general and administrative expenses, net of investment income, the settlement of the forward sales contracts, and operations of the Company’s former transportation segment. “Other” includes gains on the settlement of the Company’s forward sales contracts of $132.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 (see note 7). “Other” also includes operations of the Company’s former transportation segment which, due to the sale of the rolling stock of Apalachicola Northern Railroad in 2002, is no longer material enough to be reported as a separate segment.

      The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are each managed separately and decisions about allocations of resources are determined by management based on these strategic business units.

F-27


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Information by business segment follows (in thousands):

                           
2003 2002 2001



OPERATING REVENUES:
                       
 
Community development
  $ 494,919     $ 386,726     $ 239,699  
 
Commercial real estate development and services
    129,864       120,226       210,602  
 
Land sales
    99,206       84,048       76,185  
 
Forestry
    36,562       41,247       37,268  
 
Other
    79       3,165       3,254  
     
     
     
 
Consolidated operating revenues
  $ 760,630     $ 635,412     $ 567,008  
     
     
     
 
EBITDA:
                       
 
Community development
  $ 92,654     $ 82,403     $ 54,018  
 
Commercial real estate development and services
    21,429       20,049       18,672  
 
Land sales
    79,015       68,183       63,849  
 
Forestry
    12,164       12,217       12,979  
 
Other
    (34,557 )     143,002       14,547  
     
     
     
 
Consolidated EBITDA
    170,705       325,854       164,065  
ADJUSTMENT TO RECONCILE TO INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS:
                       
 
Depreciation and amortization
    (31,504 )     (22,780 )     (21,326 )
 
Interest expense
    (20,813 )     (23,670 )     (21,372 )
 
Income tax expense
    (42,626 )     (89,561 )     (35,441 )
 
Minority interest
    153       164       206  
 
Discontinued operations
          (38,870 )     (26,921 )
     
     
     
 
Income from continuing operations
  $ 75,915     $ 151,137     $ 59,211  
     
     
     
 
TOTAL ASSETS:
                       
 
Community development
  $ 465,290     $ 399,516     $ 315,427  
 
Commercial real estate development and services
    527,157       433,657       353,307  
 
Land sales
    15,093       7,780       3,313  
 
Forestry
    90,837       101,993       106,818  
 
Corporate
    177,353       226,941       378,153  
 
Discontinued operations
                183,541  
     
     
     
 
Total assets
  $ 1,275,730     $ 1,169,887     $ 1,340,559  
     
     
     
 
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES:
                       
 
Community development
  $ 347,207     $ 287,972     $ 248,800  
 
Commercial real estate development and services
    123,718       98,428       174,181  
 
Land sales
    3,306       190       247  
 
Forestry
    3,437       3,435       6,250  
 
Other
    8,259       2,881       19,374  
 
Discontinued operations
          579       4,042  
     
     
     
 
Total capital expenditures
  $ 485,927     $ 393,485     $ 452,894  
     
     
     
 

F-28


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
15. Commitments and Contingencies

      The Company has obligations under various noncancelable long-term operating leases for office space and equipment. Some of these leases contain escalation clauses for operating costs, property taxes and insurance. In addition, the Company has various obligations under other office space and equipment leases of less than one year. Total rent expense was $5.3 million, $6.5 million, and $5.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001, respectively.

      The future minimum rental commitments under noncancelable long-term operating leases due over the next five years and thereafter are as follows (in thousands):

         
2004
  $ 5,251  
2005
    4,554  
2006
    3,372  
2007
    2,300  
2008
    103  
Thereafter
    34  
     
 
    $ 15,614  
     
 

      The Company and its affiliates are involved in litigation on a number of matters and are subject to certain claims which arise in the normal course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

      The Company has retained certain self-insurance risks with respect to losses for third party liability, worker’s compensation, property damage, group health insurance provided to employees and other types of insurance.

      At December 31, 2003, the Company was a party to surety bonds and standby letters of credit in the amounts of $19.6 million and $21.6 million, respectively, which may potentially result in liability to the Company if certain obligations of the Company are not met.

      The Company is subject to costs arising out of environmental laws and regulations, which include obligations to remove or limit the effects on the environment of the disposal or release of certain wastes or substances at various sites, including sites which have been previously sold. It is the Company’s policy to accrue and charge against earnings environmental cleanup costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount can be reasonably estimated. As assessments and cleanups proceed, these accruals will be reviewed and adjusted, if necessary, as additional information becomes available.

F-29


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Pursuant to the terms of various agreements by which the Company disposed of its sugar assets in 1999, the Company is obligated to complete certain defined environmental remediation. Approximately $5.0 million of the sales proceeds are being held in escrow pending the completion of the remediation. The Company has separately funded the costs of remediation. In addition, approximately $1.7 million is being held in escrow representing the value of the land subject to remediation. Remediation was substantially completed in 2003. The Company expects remaining remediation to be complete by the middle of 2004 and the amounts held in escrow to be released to the Company during the second half of 2004.

      The Company is currently a party to, or involved in, legal proceedings directed at the cleanup of Superfund sites. The Company is also involved in regulatory proceedings related to the Company’s former mill site in Gulf County, Florida. The Company has accrued an allocated share of the total estimated cleanup costs for these sites. Based upon management’s evaluation of the other potentially responsible parties, the Company does not expect to incur additional amounts even though the Company has joint and several liability. Other proceedings involving environmental matters such as alleged discharge of oil or waste material into water or soil are pending or threatened against the Company. It is not possible to quantify future environmental costs because many issues relate to actions by third parties or changes in environmental regulation. However, based on information presently available, management believes that the ultimate disposition of currently known matters will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Environmental liabilities are paid over an extended period and the timing of such payments cannot be predicted with any confidence. Aggregate environmental-related accruals were $4.0 million and $4.1 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

 
16. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
                                 
Quarters Ended

December 31 September 30 June 30 March 31




(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
2003
                               
Operating revenues
  $ 226,428     $ 199,471     $ 184,474     $ 150,257  
Operating profit
    52,168       37,759       18,164       21,900  
Net income
    28,614       22,979       9,931       14,391  
Earnings per share — Basic
    0.38       0.30       0.13       0.19  
Earnings per share — Diluted
    0.37       0.30       0.13       0.18  
2002
                               
Operating revenues
  $ 226,686     $ 152,456     $ 145,530     $ 121,680  
Operating profit
    49,952       22,373       26,047       23,044  
Net income
    55,288       11,728       32,977       74,370  
Earnings per share — Basic
    0.72       0.15       0.41       0.93  
Earnings per share — Diluted
    0.70       0.15       0.40       0.90  

F-30


 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT

FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

The St. Joe Company:

      Under date of March 11, 2004, we reported on the consolidated balance sheets of The St. Joe Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flow for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003, as contained in this annual report on Form 10-K for the year 2003. In connection with our audits of the aforementioned consolidated financial statements, we also audited the related consolidated financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial statement schedule based on our audits.

      In our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

KPMG LLP

Jacksonville, Florida

March 11, 2004

S-1


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

SCHEDULE III (CONSOLIDATED) — REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2003
                                                                   
Initial Cost to Company Carried at Close of Period

Costs Capitalized
Buildings & Subsequent to Land & Land Buildings and Accumulated
Description Encumbrances Land Improvements Acquisition Improvements Improvements Total Depreciation









(In thousands)
Bay County, Florida
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
  $     $ 672     $     $ 2,969     $ 3,641     $     $ 3,641     $ 26  
 
Buildings
                390       41,590             41,980       41,980       701  
 
Residential
          1,044             12,069       13,113             13,113        
 
Timberlands
          3,896             12,503       16,399             16,399       355  
 
Unimproved land
          385                   385             385        
Broward County, Florida
                                                               
 
Building
                12,513       305             12,818       12,818       1,213  
Calhoun County, Florida
                                                               
 
Timberlands
          1,774             5,775       7,549             7,549       163  
 
Unimproved land
          182                   182             182        
Duval County, Florida
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
          258                   258             258        
 
Buildings
                4,894       28,670             33,564       33,564       2,002  
 
Residential
          4,855       1       4,309       9,165             9,165        
 
Timberlands
                      1       1             1        
Franklin County, Florida
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
                      125       125             125        
 
Residential
          58             5,022       5,080             5,080        
 
Timberlands
          1,241             1,572       2,813             2,813       61  
 
Unimproved Land
          145                   145             145        
 
Buildings
                5                   5       5        
Gadsden County, Florida
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
                                               
 
Timberlands
          1,302             2,681       3,983             3,983       91  
 
Unimproved land
          804                   804             804        
Gulf County, Florida
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
          213             193       406             406       92  
 
Buildings
                536       395             931       931       44  
 
Residential
          293             7,025       7,318             7,318        
 
Timberlands
          5,238             17,546       22,784             22,784       493  
 
Unimproved land
          250                   250             250        

S-2


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

SCHEDULE III (CONSOLIDATED) — REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2003
                                                                   
Initial Cost to Company Carried at Close of Period

Costs Capitalized
Buildings & Subsequent to Land & Land Buildings and Accumulated
Description Encumbrances Land Improvements Acquisition Improvements Improvements Total Depreciation









(In thousands)
Hillsborough County, Florida
                                                               
 
Buildings
                18,352       1,470             19,822       19,822       2,030  
Jefferson County, Florida
                                                               
 
Buildings
                      198             198       198        
 
Timberlands
          1,547             1,942       3,489             3,489       76  
 
Unimproved land
          246                   246             246        
Leon County, Florida
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
          1,418             10,157       9,157       2,418       11,575       309  
 
Buildings
                5,580       8,958             14,538       14,538       586  
 
Residential
          30             32,913       32,943             32,943        
 
Timberlands
          923             3,048       3,971             3,971       86  
 
Unimproved land
          368                   368             368        
Liberty County, Florida
                                                               
 
Buildings
                777       66             843       843        
 
Timberlands
          3,244       205       8,694       12,143             12,143       343  
 
Unimproved land
                                               
Orange County, Florida
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
          2,920             10,227       13,147             13,147       23  
 
Buildings
                28,759       15,827             44,586       44,586       3,038  
Osceola County, Florida
                                                               
 
Residential
          9,539             2,506       12,045             12,045        
Palm Beach County, Florida
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
          4,028             2,640       6,668             6,668       262  
 
Buildings
                      138             138       138       22  
Pinellas County, Florida
                                                               
 
Buildings
                28,564       3,166             31,730       31,730       3,552  
St. Johns County, Florida
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
          8,281             2,324       10,605             10,605       318  
 
Buildings
                1,834       826             2,660       2,660       213  
 
Residential
          5,223             26,829       32,052             32,052        

S-3


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

SCHEDULE III (CONSOLIDATED) — REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2003
                                                                   
Initial Cost to Company Carried at Close of Period

Costs Capitalized
Buildings & Subsequent to Land & Land Buildings and Accumulated
Description Encumbrances Land Improvements Acquisition Improvements Improvements Total Depreciation









(In thousands)
Volusia County, Florida
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
          6,045             353       6,398             6,398       539  
 
Buildings
                1,644       121             1,765       1,765       206  
 
Residential
          4,302             44,062       48,364             48,364        
Wakulla County, Florida
                                                               
 
Buildings
                      200       78       122       200       41  
 
Timberlands
          1,175             2,638       3,813             3,813       83  
 
Unimproved Land
          225                   225             225        
Walton County, Florida
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
          15,124             1,363       16,487             16,487       1,478  
 
Buildings
                25,998       2,541             28,539       28,539       1,747  
 
Residential
          2,603             33,152       35,755             35,755        
 
Timberlands
          354             945       1,299             1,299       28  
 
Unimproved land
          5                   5             5        
Other Florida Counties
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
                      24       24             24        
 
Timberlands
          685             2,910       3,595             3,595       30  
 
Unimproved land
          152                   152             152        
District of Columbia
                                                               
 
Buildings
                59,347       707             60,054       60,054       2,852  
Georgia
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
          18,947             955       19,902             19,902       74  
 
Buildings
                89,904       3,106             93,010       93,010       2,184  
 
Timberlands
          218                   218             218       5  
North Carolina
                                                               
 
Residential
          19,557             47,503       67,060             67,060        
 
Buildings
                17,163                   17,163       17,163       194  

S-4


 

THE ST. JOE COMPANY

SCHEDULE III (CONSOLIDATED) — REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

December 31, 2003
                                                                     
Initial Cost to Company Carried at Close of Period

Costs Capitalized
Buildings & Subsequent to Land & Land Buildings and Accumulated
Description Encumbrances Land Improvements Acquisition Improvements Improvements Total Depreciation









(In thousands)
Texas
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
          4,242             1,880       6,122             6,122       103  
 
Building
                2,168       21,757             23,925       23,925       4,773  
Virginia
                                                               
 
Land with infrastructure
          5,582             1,018       6,600             6,600        
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 
   
TOTALS
  $     $ 139,593     $ 298,634     $ 439,914     $ 447,332     $ 430,809     $ 878,141     $ 30,436  
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
 


Notes:

 
(A) The aggregate cost of real estate owned at December 31, 2003 for federal income tax purposes is approximately $553 million.
 
(B) Reconciliation of real estate owned (in thousands):
                         
2003 2002 2001



Balance at Beginning of Year
  $ 764,579     $ 661,971     $ 493,545  
Amounts Capitalized
    446,830       378,745       437,826  
Amounts Retired or Adjusted
    (333,268 )     (276,137 )     (269,400 )
     
     
     
 
Balance at Close of Period
  $ 878,141     $ 764,579     $ 661,971  
     
     
     
 
 
(C) Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation (in thousands):
                         
Balance at Beginning of Year
  $ 17,223     $ 9,468     $ 5,361  
Depreciation Expense
    24,841       13,861       6,190  
Amounts Retired or Adjusted
    (11,628 )     (6,106 )     (2,083 )
     
     
     
 
Balance at Close of Period
  $ 30,436     $ 17,223     $ 9,468  
     
     
     
 

S-5