Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED APRIL 30, 2003
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___________ TO _____________
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-25674
SKILLSOFT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
REPUBLIC OF IRELAND N/A
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF (I.R.S. EMPLOYER
INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION) IDENTIFICATION NO.)
107 NORTHEASTERN BOULEVARD 03062
NASHUA, NEW HAMPSHIRE (ZIP CODE)
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (603) 324-3000
107 NORTHEASTERN BOULEVARD, NASHUA, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03062
-----------------------------------------------------
(FORMER NAME, FORMER ADDRESS AND FORMER FISCAL YEAR, IF CHANGED SINCE LAST
REPORT)
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT: (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [X] No [ ]
On May 30, 2003 the registrant had outstanding 99,614,514 Ordinary Shares
(issued or issuable in exchange for the registrant's outstanding American
Depository Shares.)
-2-
SKILLSOFT PLC
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL 30, 2003
INDEX
PAGE NO.
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 30, 2003 and
January 31, 2003 4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three
Months Ended April 30, 2003 and 2002 5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three
Months Ended April 30, 2003 and 2002 6
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 7
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations 15
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk 28
Item 4. Controls and Procedures 29
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings 29
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds 32
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 32
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 32
Item 5. Other Information 32
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 32
SIGNATURES 33
CERTIFICATIONS 33
-3-
PART I
ITEM 1. - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SKILLSOFT PLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE DATA)
April 30, JANUARY 31,
2003 2003
(UNAUDITED)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 52,158 $ 45,990
Short-term investments 69,750 79,041
Accounts receivable, net 48,471 66,892
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 18,547 19,401
------------ ------------
Total current assets 188,926 211,324
Property and equipment, net 9,861 11,964
Goodwill 116,881 119,427
Acquired intangible assets, net 31,884 34,290
Long term investments 126 633
Other assets 551 499
------------ ------------
$ 348,229 $ 378,137
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 10,675 $ 10,672
Accrued expenses 47,543 59,821
Deferred revenue 105,714 109,009
------------ ------------
Total current liabilities 163,932 179,502
Long term liabilities 7,139 7,548
Stockholders' equity:
Ordinary Shares, E0.11 par value: 250,000,000 shares authorized at April
30, 2003 and January 31, 2003; 99,614,514 and 99,598,146 shares issued
and outstanding at April 30, 2003 and January 31, 2003, respectively 10,737 10,737
Additional paid-in capital 530,929 530,929
Accumulated deficit (360,217) (347,642)
Deferred compensation (3,855) (4,345)
Notes receivable from stockholders (58) (58)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (378) 1,466
------------ ------------
Total stockholders' equity 177,158 191,087
------------ ------------
$ 348,229 $ 378,137
============ ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
-4-
SKILLSOFT PLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
SKILLSOFT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED, IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,
2003 2002
Revenue $ 43,613 $ 13,805
Cost of revenue(1) 5,497 837
------------ ------------
Gross profit 38,116 12,968
Operating expenses:
Research and development(1) 12,782 3,439
Selling and marketing(1) 23,347 7,404
General and administrative(1) 8,934 1,825
Amortization of intangible assets 2,406 81
Amortization of stock-based compensation 490 351
Restructuring and other non-recurring charges 6,552 --
------------ ------------
Total operating expenses 54,511 13,100
------------ ------------
Operating loss (16,395) (132)
Other income, net 4 --
Interest income, net 363 414
Gain on sale of investments, net 3,682 --
------------ ------------
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes (12,346) 282
Provision for income taxes 229 --
------------ ------------
Net income (loss) $ (12,575) $ 282
============ ============
Net income (loss) per share (Note 10):
Basic $ (0.13) $ 0.01
============ ============
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding 99,599,477 41,114,243
============ ============
Diluted $ (0.13) $ 0.01
============ ============
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding 99,599,477 43,211,456
============ ============
(1) The following summarizes the departmental allocation of the stock-based
compensation
Cost of revenue $ 1 $ 1
Research and development 123 90
Selling and marketing 173 176
General and administrative 193 84
---- ----
$490 $351
==== ====
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
-5-
SKILLSOFT PLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED, IN THOUSANDS)
THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,
2003 2002
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $(12,575) $ 282
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities -
Stock-based compensation 490 351
Depreciation and amortization 2,412 369
Amortization of intangible assets 2,406 81
Provision for bad debts 437 75
Realized gain on sale of investments (3,618) --
Changes in current assets and liabilities -
Accounts receivable, net 18,060 2,732
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 640 (1,291)
Accounts payable (3) (319)
Accrued expenses (10,153) (4,679)
Deferred revenue (3,364) (2,043)
-------- --------
Net cash used in operating activities (5,268) (4,442)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment (239) (420)
Purchases of investments (44,941)
Maturity of short-term investments 50,262 641
Sale of investments 6,119
Other assets 4 --
-------- --------
Net cash provided by investing activities 11,205 221
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee stock
purchase plan -- 230
Payment on notes receivable -- 214
-------- --------
Net cash provided by financing activities -- 444
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 231 17
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 6,168 (3,760)
------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 45,990 25,185
-------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 52,158 $ 21,425
-------- --------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
-6-
SKILLSOFT PLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. THE COMPANY
SkillSoft PLC, formerly known as SmartForce PLC (the Company or SkillSoft), was
incorporated in Ireland on August 8, 1989. The Company is a provider of
web-based training resources that cover a variety of professional,
effectiveness, business and information technology topics. On September 6, 2002,
the Company completed its merger with SkillSoft Corporation (the Merger). Due to
a number of factors, including composition of the board of directors, management
team, and concentrated shareholder interest, all of which had SkillSoft
Corporation being in a control or majority position, the Merger was accounted
for as a reverse acquisition, with SkillSoft Corporation as the accounting
acquirer. Accordingly, the historical financial statements of SkillSoft
Corporation are the historical financial statements of the combined company, and
the assets and liabilities of the Company are accounted for as required under
the purchase method of accounting. The results of operations and cash flow of
the former SmartForce PLC, the acquired entity for accounting purposes, are
included in the financial statements of the combined company from September 6,
2002, the date on which the Merger was consummated. In connection with the
Merger, the Company changed its name to SkillSoft PLC and its fiscal year end to
January 31 (the fiscal year end of SkillSoft Corporation) from December 31 (the
Company's historical fiscal year end).
2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying, unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included
herein have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). Certain information and
footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States
have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations.
Nevertheless, the management of the Company believes that the disclosures herein
are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. In the opinion of
management, the condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all material
adjustments (consisting only of those of a normal and recurring nature) which
are necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the
Company as of April 30, 2003, the results of its operations for the three months
ended April 30, 2003 and 2002 and its cash flows for the three months ended
April 30, 2003 and 2002. These condensed consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003, as amended. The results of
operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results
of operations to be expected for the full year.
3. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND INVESTMENTS
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of
90 days or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. At April 30,
2003 and January 31, 2003, cash equivalents consisted mainly of commercial
paper, short-term notes and money market funds. The Company accounts for its
investments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
(SFAS No.115). Under SFAS No. 115, securities that the Company does not intend
to hold to maturity are reported at market value, and are classified as
available-for-sale. At April 30, 2003, the Company's investments consisted
primarily of commercial paper and short-term notes, which had an average
maturity of approximately 168 days. These investments are classified as current
assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as they mature within one
year.
4. REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company generates revenue from the license of products and services and from
providing hosting/ASP services.
The Company follows the provisions of the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) 97-2, Software Revenue
Recognition, as amended by SOP 98-4 and SOP 98-9 to account for revenue derived
pursuant to license agreements under which customers license the Company's
products and services. The pricing for the Company's courses varies based upon
the number of course titles or the courseware bundle licensed by a customer, the
number of users within the customer's organization and the length of the license
agreement (generally one, two or three years). License agreements permit
customers to exchange course titles, generally on the contract anniversary date.
Additional product features, such as hosting and on-line mentoring services, are
separately licensed for an additional fee.
The pricing for the Company's multi-modal learning (MML) licenses varies based
on the content offering selected by the customer, the number of users within the
customer's organization and the length of the license agreement. A MML license
provides customers access to a full range of learning products including
courseware, Referenceware, simulations, mentoring and prescriptive assessment.
A Referenceware license gives users access to the full library within one or
more collections (ITPro, BusinessPro, FinancePro and OfficeEssentials) from
Books24x7.com, Inc. (Books). Generally, the pricing for the Company's
Referenceware licenses varies based on the collections specified by a customer,
the number of users within the customer's organization and the length of the
license agreement.
The Company generally bills the annual license fee for the first year of a
multi-year agreement in advance. The Company recognizes revenue with respect to
courseware licenses either at the time of delivery of products or over the term
of the contract, depending on the products included in the license and specific
contract terms. In the event that the customer specifies all licensed courses to
be delivered at the outset and those courses are available and delivered on or
before the contract start date, the Company recognizes license revenue for the
first year of the contract upon execution of the contract and delivery of the
courses. The Company generally bills license fees for subsequent years of
multi-year license arrangements on the anniversary date of the agreement, and if
the customer exchanges courses and receives the exchanged courses by the renewal
date, revenue is recognized in the manner described above.
In some circumstances, the Company offers payment terms of up to six months from
the initial shipment date or anniversary date for multi-year agreements to its
customers. To the extent that a customer is given extended
-7-
payment terms, revenue is recognized as cash becomes due, assuming all of the
other elements of revenue recognition have been satisfied.
The Company recognizes revenue ratably over the license period if the number of
courses that a customer has access to is not clearly defined, available, or
selected at the inception of the contract, or if the contract has additional
undelivered elements for which the Company does not have vendor specific
objective evidence (VSOE) of the fair value of the various elements. This may
occur if the customer does not specify all licensed courses at the outset, the
customer chooses to wait for future licensed courses on a when and if available
basis, the customer is given exchange privileges that are exercisable other than
on the contract anniversaries, or the customer licenses all courses currently
available and to be developed during the term of the arrangement. A majority of
the Company's contractual arrangements result in the recognition of revenue
ratably over the license period.
The Company also derives revenue from extranet hosting/ASP services and online
mentoring services. The Company recognizes revenue related to extranet
hosting/ASP services and online mentoring services on a straight-line basis over
the period in which the service agreements are provided to the extent the
Company has VSOE for those services. If the Company does not have VSOE for these
services, revenue from the entire arrangement including any implementation fees,
is recognized on a straight-line basis over the period in which the services are
provided. For multi-element agreements where the Company provides these
services, VSOE is the basis used to allocate the total fee to the elements of
the arrangement.
The Company recognizes revenue on Referenceware and MML licenses ratably over
the term of the agreement, which matches the period the future products or
services are delivered.
The Company commences the recognition of revenue from resellers upon final sale
to the end user. With respect to reseller agreements with minimum commitments,
the Company recognizes revenue related to the portion of the minimum commitment
that exceeds the end user sales at the expiration of the commitment period.
The Company provides professional services, including instructor led training,
customized content, websites, and implementation services. The Company
recognizes service revenue as the services are performed.
The cost of satisfying any post contract support (PCS), which essentially
represents a warranty obligation, is accrued at the time license revenue is
recognized, as PCS fees are included in the annual license fee. The estimated
cost of providing PCS during the agreements is insignificant and the Company
does not offer it separately. The accrued PCS costs are included in deferred
revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
The Company records deferred revenue when either cash is received or amounts
have been billed in advance of products or services provided. Deferred revenue
includes the unrecognized portion of revenue associated with license fees for
which the Company has received payment or for which amounts have been billed and
are currently due for payment in 180 days or less. In addition, deferred revenue
includes amounts which have been billed and not collected for which revenue is
being recognized ratably over the license period. In addition, the Company
acquired approximately $47 million of deferred revenue in connection with the
Merger based upon the cost to fulfill the remaining contractual and performance
obligations plus a normal operating profit on fulfilling such obligations. As of
April 30, 2003, $10.1 million of deferred revenue relates to the remaining
balance of acquired deferred revenue.
5. ACCOUNTING FOR STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Company accounts for its stock-based employee compensation plans under the
recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," (APB No. 25) and related
Interpretations under APB No. 25. The Company provides pro forma disclosures
only of the compensation expense determined under the fair value provisions of
SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" (SFAS No. 123).
SFAS No. 123 requires the measurement of the fair value of stock options to
employees to be included in the statements of operations or disclosed in the
notes to financial statements. The Company elected the disclosure-only
alternative under SFAS No. 123, which requires disclosure of the pro forma
effects on earnings as if the fair-value-based method of accounting under SFAS
No. 123 had been adopted, as well as certain other information. In accordance
with SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and
Disclosure" (SFAS No. 148), the Company has computed the pro forma disclosures
required under SFAS No. 123 for options granted using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model prescribed by SFAS No. 123. The weighted average
information and assumptions used for the grants is as follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,
----------------------------
2003 2002
------------ ------------
Risk-free interest rates................... 3.34-3.60% 4.71-5.14%
Expected dividend yield.................... -- --
Volatility factor.......................... 103% 104%
Expected lives............................. 7 years 7 years
Weighted average fair value of options
granted.................................. $ 2.31 $ 8.01
Weighted average remaining contractual life
of options outstanding................... 8.15 years 8.83 years
Had compensation expense for its plans been determined consistent with SFAS No.
123, the Company's net loss and basic and diluted net loss per share would have
been increased to the following pro forma amounts (in thousands, except per
share data):
THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,
----------------------------
2003 2002
-------- ---------
Net income (loss) --
As reported....................................... $(12,575) $ 282
Add: Stock-based compensation expense recognized
under APB No. 25............................... 490 351
Less: Total stock-based compensation expense
-8-
determined under fair value based method for
all awards..................................... (1,259) (3,962)
-------- --------
Pro forma......................................... $(13,344) $ (3,329)
======== ========
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share --
As reported....................................... $ (0.13) $ 0.01
======== ========
Pro forma......................................... $ (0.13) $ (0.08)
======== ========
Because additional option grants are expected to be made in future periods, the
above pro forma disclosures may not be representative of pro forma effects on
results for future periods.
6. BUSINESS COMBINATION
SKILLSOFT CORPORATION
On September 6, 2002, the Company completed the Merger with SkillSoft
Corporation, a leading provider of e-Learning courseware and Referenceware for
business and IT professionals. As a result of the Merger, each issued and
outstanding share of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of SkillSoft
Corporation (the SkillSoft Common Stock) was automatically converted into the
right to receive 2.3674 (the Exchange Ratio) validly issued and fully paid
ordinary shares, nominal value E0.11 per share, of the Company, with each
ordinary share represented by an American Depository Share of the Company (ADS).
The Company also assumed each outstanding option to purchase SkillSoft Common
Stock, which had been granted under SkillSoft Corporation's existing stock
option plans, under the same exchange ratio. As discussed in Note 1, the Company
determined SkillSoft Corporation to be the acquirer for accounting purposes.
Therefore, the calculation of the stock consideration is calculated based on
SmartForce ordinary shares and options outstanding. Consequently, this
transaction resulted in the issuance of approximately 57.4 million ordinary
shares (represented by ADSs) of the Company with a fair value of approximately
$317.4 million, the assumption of options to purchase approximately 15.7 million
ordinary shares (represented by ADSs) with a Black-Scholes fair value of
approximately $38.9 million, and estimated direct transaction costs of $15.4
million. The number of ordinary shares issued and options assumed was fixed in
the agreement related to the Merger and was not subject to change prior to
closing. The fair value of the Company's ADSs was derived using a market price
per ADS of $5.53, which was based on an average of the closing prices for a
range of six trading days around the announcement date (June 10, 2002) of the
acquisition. The Company paid a premium to obtain a broader distribution channel
and a stronger presence in the e-Learning sector. Immediately following the
Merger, the former stockholders of SkillSoft Corporation owned approximately 42%
of the outstanding ordinary shares of the Company.
Subsequent to the Merger, certain accounting matters were identified relating to
the historical financial statements of SmartForce PLC (which, following the
Merger, are no longer the Company's historical financial statements - see Note
1.) On November 19, 2002, the Company announced its intent to restate the
SmartForce PLC historical financial statements for 1999, 2000, 2001 and the
first two quarters of 2002. Although the aforementioned analysis has not yet
been completed, management does not believe the impact of such revisions to the
purchase price and its allocation, if any, will have a material impact on the
consolidated financial position or results of operations of the Company.
7. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER NON-RECURRING CHARGES
MERGER AND EXIT COSTS
In connection with the Merger, the Company's management approved and initiated
plans prior to December 31, 2002 to restructure the operations of pre-Merger
SmartForce PLC to eliminate redundant facilities and headcount, reduce cost
structure, and better align the Company's operating expenses with existing
economic conditions. Consequently, the Company recorded $30.3 million of costs
relating to exiting activities of pre-Merger SmartForce PLC, such as severance
and related benefits, costs to vacate leased facilities and other pre-Merger
liabilities. These costs were accounted for under EITF 95-3, "Recognition of
Liabilities in Connection with Purchase Business Combinations." These costs were
recognized as a liability assumed in the purchase business combination and
included in the allocation of the purchase price, and have been included as an
increase to goodwill.
The reductions in employee headcount totaled approximately 632 employees from
the administrative, sales, marketing and development functions, and amounted to
a charge of approximately $14.5 million. Approximately $10.6 million was paid
out against the exit plan accrual through April 30, 2003, and the remaining
amount of $1.8 million, net of adjustments, is expected to be paid by October
2003.
In connection with the exit plan, the Company decided to abandon or downsize
certain leased facilities. For the year ended January 31, 2003, facilities
consolidation charges of $12.7 million, consisting of sublease losses, broker
commissions and other facility costs, were recorded in connection with the
downsizing and closing of sites. As of April 30, 2003, 8 sites had been vacated
and 3 sites had been downsized and actions related to the remaining identified
sites are scheduled to occur by the end of fiscal 2004. To determine the
sublease loss, which is the loss after the Company's cost recovery efforts from
subleasing the building, certain assumptions were made related to the (1) time
period over which the property will remain vacant, (2) sublease terms and (3)
sublease rates. The lease loss is an estimate under SFAS No. 5 "Accounting for
Contingencies" and represents the low end of the range and will be adjusted in
the future upon triggering events including a change in estimate of time to
sublease, actual sublease rates, etc. The Company has estimated that the high
end of the lease loss could be $16.4 million if operating lease rental rates
continue to decrease in these markets or should it take longer than expected to
find a suitable tenant to sublease the facility.
During the quarter ended April 30, 2003, activity in the Company's merger and
exit costs, which are included in accrued expenses (see Note 15), was as follows
(in thousands):
-9-
Employee
Severance and Closedown of
Related Costs Facilities Other Total
------------- ------------ -------- --------
Merger and exit accrual
January 31, 2003 $ 5,967 $ 11,383 $ 1,209 $18,559
Payments made during the
quarter ended April 30, 2003 (2,039) (1,085) (83) (3,207)
Adjustment to accrual (2,125) -- -- (2,125)
------- -------- ------- -------
Merger and exit accrual
April 30, 2003 $ 1,803 $ 10,298 $ 1,126 $13,227
======= ======== ======= =======
The adjustment to the merger and exit accrual was due to the settlement of
certain liabilities at amounts less than initially recorded.
The Company anticipates that the remainder of the merger and exit accrual will
be paid out by October 2011 as follows (in thousands):
Year ended January 31, 2004 $7,399
Year ended January 31, 2005 4,317
Year ended January 31, 2006 671
Year ended January 31, 2007 260
Year ended January 31, 2008 156
Thereafter 424
-------
Total $13,227
========
At January 31, 2003, the Company had a remaining accrual balance of
approximately $91,000 related to its acquisition of Books. This balance was paid
by March 2003.
RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER NON-RECURRING CHARGES
The Company recorded a $14.2 million restructuring charge for the year ended
January 31, 2003, which was included in the statement of operations.
Approximately $10.2 million of this charge represents the compensation cost of
terminated SmartForce PLC employees for services rendered from the date of the
Merger through such employees' termination dates and certain other non-recurring
compensation costs to terminated and continuing employees of the Company. Also
included in the $14.2 million charge are certain other non-recurring costs
incurred by SkillSoft Corporation as a result of the Merger. These costs
primarily consist of employee severance and related costs and contractual
obligations. Payments made under these obligations through January 31, 2003 and
April 30, 2003 aggregated approximately $9.4 million and $1.0 million,
respectively.
During the three months ended April 30, 2003, the Company recorded an additional
$1.2 million of charges related to further restructuring of the pre-Merger
SmartForce PLC operations. These restructuring costs included additional
compensation to pre-Merger SmartForce employees as well as additional
non-recurring costs as a result of the Merger.
During the quarter ended April 30, 2003, activity in the Company's restructuring
provision related to the Merger was as follows (in thousands):
Employee
Severance and Contractual
Related Costs Obligations Total
------------- ----------- --------
Restructuring provision
January 31, 2003 $ 3,254 $1,556 $ 4,810
Payments made during the
quarter ended April 30, 2003 (1,479) (735) (2,214)
Restructuring charge
for the quarter ended April 30, 2003 604 589 1,193
------ ------ -------
Restructuring provision
April 30, 2003 $ 2,379 $1,410 $ 3,789
======= ====== =======
The Company anticipates that the remainder of the restructuring accrual will be
paid out by January 2004.
The restructuring charges for the three months ended April 30, 2003 would have
been allocated as follows had the Company recorded the expense within the
functional department of the restructured activities (in thousands):
Cost of sales $ --
Research and development 59
Sales and marketing 282
General and administrative 852
----------
Total $ 1,193
==========
For the three months ended April 30, 2003, the Company recorded $5.4 million in
expenses related to the restatement of the historical SmartForce PLC financial
statements. These expenses consisted primarily of professional fees including
legal, accounting and consulting fees. The Company expects to incur additional
costs in this matter which will be expensed as incurred.
8. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
On February 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets." As a result, the Company will annually evaluate goodwill for
impairment. The Company will also evaluate goodwill whenever events and changes
in circumstances suggest that the carrying amount may not be recoverable from
estimated future cash flows.
-10-
Goodwill and intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):
April 30, 2003 January 31, 2003
Gross Net Gross Net
Carrying Accumulated Carrying Carrying Accumulated Carrying
Amount Amortization Amount Amount Amortization Amount
-------- ------------ -------- -------- ------------ --------
Internally developed
software/courseware $ 25,600 $ 4,435 $ 21,165 $ 25,600 $ 2,822 $ 22,778
Customer contracts 12,500 2,681 9,819 12,500 1,888 10,612
Trademarks and trade name 900 -- 900 900 -- 900
-------- ------------ -------- -------- ------------ --------
39,000 7,116 31,884 39,000 4,710 34,290
Goodwill 116,881 -- 116,881 119,427 -- 119,427
-------- ------------ -------- -------- ------------ --------
$155,881 $ 7,116 $148,765 $158,427 $ 4,710 $153,717
======== ============ ======== ======== ============ ========
The change in goodwill at April 30, 2003 from the amount recorded at January 31,
2003 was due to the settlement of certain liabilities at amounts less than
initially recorded and collections of accounts receivable in excess of the
estimated realizable value at the purchase date.
Amortization expense for the three months ended April 30, 2003 and the fiscal
year ended January 31, 2003 is as follows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended Fiscal Year Ended
April 30, 2003 January 31, 2003
------------------ -----------------
Internal developed
software/courseware $ 1,613 $ 2,805
Customer contracts 793 1,878
----------- -----------
$ 2,406 $ 4,683
=========== ===========
Amortization expense for the next five fiscal years is expected to be as
follows: (in thousands):
Fiscal Year Amortization Expense
2004 $ 9,623
2005 8,996
2006 8,316
2007 4,686
2008 1,248
Thereafter 521
The Company will be conducting its annual impairment test of goodwill in the
fourth quarter of the fiscal year ending January 31, 2004.
9. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income", requires disclosure of all
components of comprehensive income (loss) on an annual and interim basis.
Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business
enterprise during a period resulting from transactions, other events and
circumstances from non-owner sources. The components of comprehensive income
(loss) for the three months ended April 30, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED
April 30,
2003 2002
-------- -----
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income (loss) $(12,575) $ 282
Other comprehensive loss -
Foreign currency adjustment (18) (32)
Unrealized holding gains during the period 158 --
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains
included in net income (1,984) --
-------- -----
Comprehensive income (loss) $(14,419) $ 250
======== =====
10. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Basic net income (loss) per share was computed using the weighted average number
of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share was
computed by giving effect to all dilutive potential shares outstanding. Basic
and diluted net loss per share for the three months ended April 30, 2003 are the
same as outstanding options, and unvested restricted shares, which aggregated
24,958,985 shares, are antidilutive as the
-11-
Company has recorded a net loss for the period. As a result of the reverse
acquisition, historical SkillSoft Corporation shares have been restated into
SmartForce ADSs using the exchange ratio of one SkillSoft Corporation share per
2.3674 SmartForce ADSs. Historical SkillSoft Corporation shares for all periods
presented have been adjusted to reflect this exchange ratio. Basic net income
(loss) per share and diluted net loss per share are calculated using the
following:
THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,
2003 2002
---------- ----------
Basic weighted average shares outstanding 99,599,477 41,114,243
Effect of dilutive shares outstanding -- 2,097,213
---------- ----------
Weighted average common shares outstanding, as adjusted 99,599,477 43,211,456
-12-
11. INCOME TAXES
The Company operates as a holding company with operating subsidiaries in several
countries and each subsidiary is taxed based on the laws of the jurisdiction in
which it operates.
The Company has significant net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, which are
subject to potential limitations based upon change in control provisions of
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended.
The provision for income taxes in the three month period ended April 30, 2003 of
$229,000 relates to income generated in foreign countries which cannot be offset
through loss carryforwards.
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
See Part II - Item 1, entitled "Legal Proceedings", for a description of
litigation involving the Company.
13. DISCLOSURES ABOUT SEGMENTS OF AN ENTERPRISE
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 131, "Disclosures About Segments
of an Enterprise and Related Information" (SFAS No. 131). SFAS No. 131
established standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in
annual financial statements and requires selected information for those segments
to be presented in interim financial reports issued to stockholders. SFAS No.
131 also established standards for related disclosures about products and
services and geographic areas. Operating segments are identified as components
of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is
available for evaluation by the chief operating decision maker, or
decision-making group, in making decisions of how to allocate resources and
assess performance. The Company's chief operating decision makers, as defined
under SFAS No. 131, are the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial
Officer. Prior to the Merger, the Company had viewed its operations and managed
its business as principally one operating segment. Subsequent to the Merger, the
Company has viewed its operations and manages its business as principally two
operating segments -- multi-modal learning and retail certification.
Revenue for the three months ended April 30, 2003 for the multi-modal learning
and retail certification segments was $41.3 million and $2.3 million,
respectively. The net loss for the three months ended April 30, 2003 for the
multi-modal learning and retail certification segments was $11.1 million and
$1.5 million, respectively.
The Company attributes revenues to different geographical areas on the basis of
the location of the customer. Revenues by geographic area are as follows (in
thousands):
THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30,
---------------------------
2003 2002
------------ ------------
Revenue:
United States.......................................... $36,640 $11,530
United Kingdom......................................... 1,962 1,482
Canada................................................. 945 358
Europe, excluding UK................................... 3,347 --
Australia/New Zealand.................................. 616 435
Other (Countries less than 5% individually, by
Region).............................................. 103 --
------- -------
Total revenue........................................ $43,613 $13,805
======= =======
Long-lived tangible assets at international facilities are not significant.
There have been no material changes in total assets of either the multi-modal
learning or retail certification segments from the amount reported at January
31, 2003.
14. OTHER MATTERS
In June 2003, the Company acquired the assets of GoTrain Corp., an e-Learning
business, for approximately $5 million in cash, which was paid in the second
quarter of the fiscal year.
In June 2003, the Company reached an agreement with IP Learn relating to an
alleged infringement of certain patent related matters. Under the terms of the
agreement, the Company is required to make a cash payment and issue ordinary
shares (which will be represented by restricted ADSs) to IP Learn. The Company
has recorded a provision of $2,250,000, which is net of expected insurance
proceeds, in general and administrative expenses as of April 30, 2003. Amounts
due under this agreement will be paid in the second quarter.
15. ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed combined balance sheet consist of
the following (in thousands):
April 30, 2003 January 31, 2003
-------------- ----------------
Accrued compensation and benefits $ 7,343 $ 16,655
Professional fees 13,526 10,121
Accrued merger related costs 6,972 12,304
-13-
Accrued accounts payable 4,695 8,300
Other 15,007 12,441
----------- ------------
Total Accrued Expenses $ 47,543 $ 59,821
=========== ============
16. RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.
145, "Rescission of Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 13, and Technical Corrections." Under SFAS No. 145, gains and losses on
extinguishments of debt are to be classified as income or loss from continuing
operations rather than extraordinary items. The Company was required to adopt
SFAS No. 145 in the first quarter of the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 and
the adoption of this statement did not have a material impact on its financial
condition or results of operations.
In July 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS
No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." The
statement requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal
activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to
exit or disposal plan. Costs covered by SFAS No. 146 include lease termination
costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a
restructuring, branch closing, or other exit disposal activity. This statement
is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
SFAS No. 146 may affect the timing of the Company's recognition of future exit
or disposal costs, if any.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 (FIN No. 45),
"Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others." FIN No. 45 requires a guarantor
to record certain guarantees at fair value and to make significant new
disclosures, even when the likelihood of making any payments under the guarantee
is remote. The interpretation and its disclosure requirements are effective for
financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15,
2002. The interpretation's initial recognition and initial measurement
provisions are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or
modified after December 31, 2002. The guarantor's previous accounting for
guarantees issued prior to December 31, 2002 should not be revised or restated
due to the adoption of this interpretation. The adoption of FIN No. 45 did not
have a material impact on the Company's financial condition or results of
operations.
-14-
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN No. 46),
"Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," which requires the consolidation
of a variable interest entity, as defined, by its primary beneficiary. Primary
beneficiaries are those companies that are subject to a majority of the risk of
loss or entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns, or
both. In determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity, an entity with a variable interest shall treat variable
interests in that same entity held by its related parties as its own interests.
The Company is currently evaluating the existence of variable interest entities,
if any, and the impact of adopting the interpretation on the consolidated
financial statements.
In January 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure," an amendment of SFAS No. 123, which
provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to fair value
based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition,
SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require
prominent disclosures in annual financial statements about the method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method
used on reported results. The Company has elected to continue to account for
stock-based compensation under APB No. 25, and related Interpretations under FIN
44 and elect the disclosure-only alternative under SFAS No. 123 and the enhanced
disclosures as required by SFAS No. 148.
ITEM 2. - MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Any statement in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q about our future
expectations, plans and prospects, including statements containing the words
"believes," "anticipates," "plans," "expects," "will" and similar expressions,
constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of The Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Actual results may differ materially
from those indicated by such forward-looking statements as a result of various
important factors, including those set forth in this Item 2 under the heading
"Future Operating Results".
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes
appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
OVERVIEW
We are the result of the merger of SmartForce PLC (SmartForce or SmartForce PLC)
and SkillSoft Corporation. The new combined SkillSoft PLC is a global leader in
corporate e-Learning and brings together SmartForce's leading portfolio of IT
e-Learning content with SkillSoft Corporation's extensive suite of business
skills e-Learning courseware, as well as its information technology (IT) and
business Referenceware libraries.
The merger of SmartForce and SkillSoft Corporation (the Merger) closed on
September 6, 2002. For accounting purposes, the Merger was accounted for as a
reverse acquisition, with SkillSoft Corporation as the accounting acquirer. The
historical financial statements of SkillSoft Corporation have become our
historical financial statements, and the results of operations of SkillSoft PLC
(formerly known as SmartForce PLC) are included in our results of operations
only from September 6, 2002. For accounting purposes, the purchase price was
approximately $371.7 million which consisted of the value of stock and options
issued, and transaction and merger costs. The excess purchase price over the net
tangible assets was primarily allocated to goodwill, content and customer base.
A primary reason for the increase in our revenue and operating expenses from the
three months ended April 30, 2002 to the three months ended April 30, 2003 is
the inclusion of the operating results of SkillSoft PLC. We operate as two
reporting segments: multi-modal learning and retail certification. These
reporting units are not discussed separately as the impact on the comparison of
financial results from period to period is not significant.
We are a leading global provider of comprehensive, multi-modal e-Learning
content and software products for business and IT professionals. Multi-modal
learning (MML) solutions offer powerful tools to support and enhance the speed
and effectiveness of both formal and informal learning processes. MML solutions
integrate our in-depth courseware, learning management platform technology and
support services to meet our customers' learning needs.
We derive revenue primarily pursuant to license agreements under which customers
license our products and services. The pricing for our courses varies based upon
the number of course titles or the courseware bundle licensed by a customer, the
number of users within the customer's organization and the length of the license
agreement (generally one, two or three years). Our license agreements permit
customers to exchange course titles, generally on the contract anniversary date.
Additional product features, such as hosting and on-line mentoring services, are
separately licensed for an additional fee.
The pricing for our MML licenses varies based on the content offering selected
by the customer, the number of users within the customer's organization and the
length of the license agreement. Our MML license provides customers access to a
full range of learning products including courseware, Referenceware,
simulations, mentoring and prescriptive assessment.
A Referenceware license from Books gives users access to the full library within
one or more collections (ITPro, BusinessPro, FinancePro and OfficeEssentials).
Generally, the pricing for our Referenceware licenses varies based on the
collections specified by a customer, the number of users within the customer's
organization and the length of the license agreement.
We offer discounts from our ordinary pricing, and purchasers of licenses for
larger numbers of courses, for larger user bases or for longer periods generally
receive discounts. Generally, customers may amend their license agreements, for
an additional fee, to gain access to additional courses or product lines and/or
to increase the size of the user base. We also derive revenue from hosting fees
for clients that use our solutions on an Application Service Provider (ASP)
basis, on-line mentoring services and professional services. In selected
circumstances, we derive revenue on a pay-for-use basis under which some
customers are charged based on the number of courses accessed by users. Revenue
derived from pay-for-use contracts has been minimal to date.
We generally bill the annual license fee for the first year of a multi-year
agreement in advance. We recognize revenue with respect to courseware licenses
either at the time of delivery of products or over the term of the contract,
depending on products included in the license and specific contract terms. In
the event that the
-15-
customer specifies all licensed courses to be delivered at the outset and those
courses are available and delivered on or before the contract start date, we
recognize license revenue for the first year of the contract upon execution of
the contract and delivery of the courses. We generally bill license fees for
subsequent years of multi-year license arrangements on the anniversary date of
the agreement, and if the customer exchanges courses and receives the exchanged
courses by the renewal date, revenue is recognized in the manner described
above.
In some circumstances, we offer payment terms of up to six months from the
initial shipment date or anniversary date for multi-year agreements to our
customers. To the extent that a customer is given extended payment terms,
revenue is recognized as cash becomes due, assuming all of the other elements of
revenue recognition have been satisfied.
We recognize revenue ratably over the license period if the number of courses
that a customer has access to is not clearly defined, available, or selected at
the inception of the contract, or if the contract has additional undelivered
elements for which we do not have vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE) of
the fair value of the various elements. This may occur if the customer does not
specify all licensed courses at the outset, the customer chooses to wait for
future licensed courses on a when and if available basis, the customer is given
exchange privileges that are exercisable other than on the contract
anniversaries, or the customer licenses all courses currently available and to
be developed during the term of the arrangement. A majority of our contractual
arrangements result in the recognition of revenue ratably over the license
period.
We also derive revenue from extranet hosting/ASP services and online mentoring
services. We recognize revenue related to extranet hosting/ASP services and
online mentoring services on a straight-line basis over the period in which the
service agreements are provided to the extent we have VSOE for those services.
If we do not have VSOE for these services, revenue from the entire arrangement,
including any implementation fees, is recognized on a straight-line basis over
the period in which the services are provided. For multi-element agreements
where we provide these services, VSOE is the basis used to allocate the total
fee to the elements of the arrangement.
We recognize revenue on Referenceware and MML licenses ratably over the term of
the agreement, which matches the period the future products or services are
delivered.
We commence the recognition of revenue from resellers upon the final sale to the
end user. With respect to reseller agreements with minimum commitments, we
recognize revenue related to the portion of the minimum commitment that exceeds
end user sales at the expiration of the commitment period.
We provide professional services, including instructor led training, customized
content, websites and implementation services. We recognize professional service
revenue as the services are performed. The cost of satisfying any post contract
support (PCS), which essentially represents a warranty obligation, is accrued at
the time license revenue is recognized, as PCS fees are included in the annual
license fee. The estimated cost of providing PCS during the agreements is
insignificant and we do not offer it separately. The accrued PCS costs are
included in deferred revenue in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
We record deferred revenue when either cash is received or amounts have been
billed in advance of products or services provided. Deferred revenue includes
the unrecognized portion of revenue associated with license fees for which we
have received payment or for which amounts have been billed and are currently
due for payment in 180 days or less. In addition, deferred revenue includes
amounts, which have been billed and not collected, for which revenue is being
recognized ratably over the license period. In addition, in connection with the
Merger, we acquired approximately $47 million of deferred revenue which was
valued based upon the estimated cost to fulfill the remaining contractual and
performance obligations plus a normal operating profit on fulfilling such
obligations.
Cost of revenue includes the cost of materials (such as storage media),
packaging, shipping and handling, CD duplication the cost of online mentoring
and hosting services, royalties and certain infrastructure and occupancy
expenses. We generally recognize these costs as incurred. Research and
development expenses consist primarily of salaries and benefits, certain
infrastructure and occupancy expenses, fees to consultants and course content
development fees. We account for software development costs in accordance with
SFAS No. 86, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased
or Otherwise Marketed," which requires the capitalization of certain computer
software development costs incurred after technological feasibility is
established. To date, development costs after establishment of technological
feasibility have been immaterial, and we have expensed all software development
costs as incurred. Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries,
commissions and benefits, advertising and promotion, travel and certain
infrastructure and occupancy expenses. General and administrative expenses
consist primarily of salaries and benefits, consulting and service expenses,
legal expenses, other public company costs and certain infrastructure and
occupancy expenses.
Deferred compensation consists of two components: (1) the value of unvested
options assumed in the Books acquisition and the Merger, and (2) the aggregate
difference between the exercise or sale price of common stock options granted or
restricted common stock sold during the year ended January 31, 2000 and the fair
market value of the common stock as determined for accounting purposes. The
deferred compensation is amortized over the vesting period of the underlying
stock option or stock.
Amortization of intangibles represents the amortization of intangibles, such as
customer value and content, from the Books acquisition and the Merger.
Restructuring and other non-recurring charges primarily consist of compensation
cost of severed SmartForce employees for services rendered from the date of the
Merger through April 30, 2003 and prior to such employees' termination dates and
certain other non-recurring compensation costs to terminated and continuing
employees. Additionally, these charges include expenses associated with the
pending restatement of SmartForce's financial statements for 1999, 2000, 2001
and the first two quarters of 2002. See Note 7 of the Notes to the Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2 of the
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form
10-K. However, we believe the accounting policies described below are
particularly important to the portrayal and understanding of our financial
position and results of operations and require application of significant
judgment by our management. In applying these policies, management uses its
judgment in making certain assumptions and estimates.
-16-
REVENUE RECOGNITION
We recognize revenue in accordance with American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA) Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2 "Software Revenue
Recognition," as amended by SOP No. 98-4 and SOP No. 98-9. Additionally, for
agreements under which we are selling licenses and services, we recognize
revenue under EITF 00-3 "Application of AICPA Statement of Position 97-2 to
Arrangements That Include the Right to Use Software Stored on Another's
Hardware" and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 "Revenue Recognition." These
statements require that four basic criteria must be satisfied before revenue can
be recognized:
- Persuasive evidence of an arrangement between us and a third party
exists;
- Delivery of our product has occurred;
- The sales price for the product is fixed or determinable; and
- Collection of the sales price is probable.
Our management uses its judgment concerning the satisfaction of these criteria,
particularly the criteria relating to the determination of when delivery has
occurred and the criteria relating to the collectibility of the receivables
relating to such sales. Should changes and conditions cause management to
determine that these criteria are not met for certain future transactions,
revenue recognized for any period could be adversely affected. However, this is
mitigated by the fact that the majority of our revenue is recognized ratably
over the term of the respective license. Please see the discussion under the
"Overview" section concerning how we recognize revenue.
IMPAIRMENT OF GOODWILL
We review the carrying value of goodwill periodically based upon the expected
future and discounted operating cash flows of our business. Our cash flow
estimates are based on historical results adjusted to reflect our best estimate
of future markets and operating conditions. Actual results may differ materially
from these estimates. The timing and size of impairment charges involves the
application of management's judgment and could significantly affect our
operating results. As a result of the Merger, one of our largest assets is
goodwill. In response to several factors in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003,
we re-evaluated the fair value of the goodwill established in connection with
the Merger and the Books acquisition and recorded an impairment charge of
approximately $250.1 million.
Legal Contingencies
We are currently involved in certain legal proceedings. In connection with these
legal proceedings, which we discuss in Part II -- Item 1, management
periodically reviews estimates of potential costs to be incurred by us in
connection with the adjudication or settlement, if any, of these proceedings.
These estimates are developed in consultation with our outside counsel and are
based on an analysis of potential litigation outcomes and settlement strategies.
In accordance with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies", loss
contingencies are accrued if, in the opinion of management, an adverse outcome
is probable and such outcome can be reasonably estimated. We do not currently
have a basis for concluding that these proceedings will have a material adverse
effect on our financial position; however, it is possible that future results
for any particular quarter or annual period may be materially adversely affected
by changes in our assumptions or the effectiveness of our strategies relating to
these proceedings.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2003 VERSUS THREE MONTHS ENDED APRIL 30, 2002
Revenue increased $29.8 million or 216% to $43.6 million in the three months
ended April 30, 2003 from $13.8 million in the three months ended April 30,
2002. This increase was due primarily to the addition of revenue from
SmartForce's historical customer base. To a lesser extent, this increase
resulted from our new customers and increased revenue from existing customers.
Cost of revenue increased $4.7 million or 562% to $5.5 million in the three
months ended April 30, 2003 from $837,000 in the three months ended April 30,
2002. Cost of revenue as a percentage of total revenue was 13% for the three
months ended April 30, 2003 compared to 6% for the three months ended April 30,
2002. These increases were primarily due to increased costs of supporting the
SmartForce hosting business and royalty fees associated with SmartForce's IT
product line and, to a lesser extent, our Referenceware product line.
Research and development increased $9.4 or 276% to $12.8 million in the three
months ended April 30, 2003 from $3.4 million in the three months ended April
30, 2002. Research and development expenses as a percentage of total revenue
increased to 29% in the three months ended April 30, 2003 from 25% in the three
months ended April 30, 2002. This increase was primarily due to the addition of
SmartForce's development organization. We believe our outsourcing strategy for
some of our courses provides us significant flexibility to control these costs
and although we expect research and development expenses to continue to
increase, we expect that they will decrease as a percentage of revenue.
Selling and marketing expenses increased $15.9 million or 215% to $23.3 million
in the three months ended April 30, 2003 from $7.4 million in the three months
ended April 30, 2002. Selling and marketing expenses as a percentage of total
revenue decreased to 53% in the three months ended April 30, 2003 from 54% in
the three months ended April 30, 2002. Selling and marketing expenses increased
due to the addition of SmartForce's sales and marketing organization and related
costs. We believe that a significant investment in selling and marketing to
expand our distribution channels worldwide is required to remain competitive,
and we therefore expect selling and marketing expenses to increase in amount but
decrease as a percentage of revenue.
General and administrative expenses increased $7.1 million or 394%, to $8.9
million in the three months ended April 30, 2003 from $1.8 million in the three
months ended April 30, 2002. General and administrative expenses as a percentage
of total revenue increased to 20% in the three months ended April 30, 2003 from
13% in the three
-17-
months ended April 30, 2002. General and administrative expenses increased
primarily due to the SmartForce-SkillSoft merger. These expenses also increased
as a result of higher litigation costs including settlement payments, in the
quarter ended April 30, 2003. We anticipate that general and administrative
expenses will continue to increase in absolute dollars due primarily to
increases in litigation expenses and the increased costs of operating as a
public company.
Amortization of intangible assets was $2.4 million in the three months ended
April 30, 2003 and $81,000 during the three months ended April 30, 2002. The
primary reason for the increase was the additional amortization related to
intangibles acquired in the Merger.
Stock-based compensation expense increased to $490,000 in the three months ended
April 30, 2003 from $351,000 in the three months ended April 30, 2002. The
increase reflects additional deferred compensation expense as a result of the
SmartForce-SkillSoft merger. The expense was primarily the result of
amortization of deferred compensation resulting from granting of stock options
to employees at exercise prices below the fair market value of the stock and the
sale of restricted common stock with sales prices below the fair market value of
the stock. The stock options granted and restricted stock sold at prices below
fair market value of the stock were granted by SkillSoft Corporation prior to
its initial public offering and by Books, prior to its acquisition by SkillSoft
Corporation in December 2001.
Restructuring and other non-recurring charges were $6.6 million in the three
months ended April 30, 2003. These charges include an additional $1.2 million
related to further restructuring of the pre-Merger SmartForce PLC operations and
$5.4 million related to the pending restatement of the historical SmartForce PLC
financial statements.
Interest income, net decreased to $363,000 in the three months ended April 30,
2003 from $414,000 in the three months ended April 30, 2002. This decrease was
primarily due to lower interest rates on our cash and cash equivalents and
investments.
Gain on sale of investments, net was $3.7 million for the three months
ended April 30, 2003. This was primarily related to a gain of $3.6 million from
the sale of a certain investment.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of April 30, 2003, our principal source of liquidity was our cash and cash
equivalents and short-term investments, which totaled $121.9 million.
Net cash used in operating activities was $5.3 million and $4.4 million for the
three months ended April 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Our net cash used for
the three months ended April 30, 2003 reflects primarily our net loss of $12.6
million and an increase of $10.2 million in accrued expenses. This was offset by
a decrease in our accounts receivable of $18.4 million, which was the result of
increased collections.
Cash provided by investing activities was $11.2 million and $221,000 for the
three months ended April 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Maturation of
investments and sales of investments, net of purchases (short and long-term),
generated a net cash inflow of approximately $11.4 million in the three months
ended April 30, 2003 compared to a net cash inflow of approximately $600,000 in
the three months ended April 30, 2002.
Cash provided by financing activities was $0 and $444,000 for the three months
ended April 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. For the three months ended April
30, 2002, these proceeds related to the exercise of stock options and purchases
under the employee stock purchase plan as well as payments on notes receivable
related to restricted stock.
Working capital was approximately $25.0 million and $31.8 million as of April
30, 2003 and January 31, 2003, respectively. Total assets were approximately
$348.2 million and $378.1 million as of April 30, 2003 and January 31, 2003,
respectively. As of April 30, 2003, goodwill and separately identifiable
intangible assets were $116.9 million and $31.9 million, respectively.
On April 28, 2003, we signed a term sheet to obtain a $25 million one-year,
secured line of credit from a bank. We expect to execute the definitive loan
documents in the near future. Under the terms of the line of credit, the
facility is to be initially secured by cash held in a certificate of deposit in
the amount of the line, plus a first security interest in all domestic business
assets. The cash held in the certificate of deposit is to be released on a
quarterly basis beginning the quarter following the achievement of two
consecutive minimum levels of operating income. All borrowings under the line of
credit bear interest at the lesser of the bank's prime rate or the 30 or 60-day
Libor rate plus 2.75%.
As of January 31, 2003, we had worldwide net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $359 million for income tax purposes available to reduce future
income taxes, if any.
We lease certain of our facilities and certain equipment and furniture under
operating lease agreements that expire at various dates through 2023. Future
minimum lease payments, net of estimated rentals, under these agreements are as
follow (in thousands):
FISCAL YEAR ENDING JANUARY 31: FACILITIES OTHER TOTAL
- ------------------------------ ---------- ------ -------
2004..................................................... $ 6,051 $1,695 $ 7,746
2005..................................................... 5,291 814 6,105
2006..................................................... 4,098 77 4,175
2007..................................................... 3,344 12 3,356
2008..................................................... 3,199 2 3,201
Thereafter............................................... 11,366 -- 11,366
We have entered into long-term agreements with third parties to provide content
and subject matter expertise. In connection with these agreements, our minimum
obligations are approximately $5.8 million and $2.3 million for the fiscal years
ending January 31, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
We expect to continue to experience significant growth in capital expenditures
and operating expenses,
-18-
particularly sales and marketing and product development expenses, for the
foreseeable future in order to execute our business plan. To the extent that our
execution of the business plan results in increased sales, we expect to
experience corresponding increases in deferred revenue and prepaid expenses. We
expect that the principal sources of funding for our operating expenses, capital
expenditures and other liquidity needs will be a combination of our available
cash equivalents and marketable securities (which totaled $121.9 million as of
April 30, 2003) and funds generated from operations. Approximately $3.2 million
was paid out during the quarter ended April 30, 2003 against the accrual
established to restructure the operations of pre-Merger SmartForce PLC.
Approximately $7.4 million of the $30.3 million exit plan accrual is expected to
be paid by January 2004, and the remaining value of approximately $5.8 million
is expected to be disbursed through October 2011. In addition, in June 2003, we
acquired the assets of GoTrain Corp., an e-Learning business, for approximately
$5 million in cash which was paid during the second quarter. We also reached a
litigation settlement agreement in June 2003 which will require a cash payment
of approximately $1.8 million. We believe our current funds and expected cash
flows from operating activities will be sufficient to fund our operations for at
least the next 12 months. However, there are a number of factors that may
negatively impact our available sources of funds including unfavorable outcomes
or settlements of pending litigation. The amount of cash generated from
operations will be dependent upon the successful execution of our business plan
and worldwide economic conditions. In addition, our cash needs may increase due
to factors such as unanticipated developments in our business or significant
acquisitions.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No.
145, "Rescission of Statements No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 13, and Technical Corrections." Under SFAS No. 145, gains and losses on
extinguishments of debt are to be classified as income or loss from continuing
operations rather than extraordinary items. We were required to adopt SFAS No.
145 in the first quarter of fiscal 2004 and the adoption of this statement did
not have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In July 2002, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS
No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities." The
statement requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal
activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to
exit or disposal plan. Costs covered by SFAS No. 146 include lease termination
costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a
restructuring, branch closing, or other exit disposal activity. This statement
is effective for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
SFAS No. 146 may affect the timing of our recognition of future exit or disposal
costs, if any.
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 (FIN No. 45),
"Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others." FIN No. 45 requires a guarantor
to record certain guarantees at fair value and to make significant new
disclosures, even when the likelihood of making any payments under the guarantee
is remote. The interpretation and its disclosure requirements are effective for
financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15,
2002. The interpretation's initial recognition and initial measurement
provisions are applicable on a prospective basis to guarantees issued or
modified after December 31, 2002. The guarantor's previous accounting for
guarantees issued prior to December 31, 2002 should not be revised or restated
due to the adoption of this interpretation. The adoption of FIN No. 45 did not
have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 (FIN No. 46),
"Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," which requires the consolidation
of a variable interest entity, as defined, by its primary beneficiary. Primary
beneficiaries are those companies that are subject to a majority of the risk of
loss or entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns, or
both. In determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity, an entity with a variable interest shall treat variable
interests in that same entity held by its related parties as its own interests.
We are currently evaluating the existence of variable interest entities, if any,
and the impact of adopting the interpretation on the consolidated financial
statements.
In January 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation-Transition and Disclosure," an amendment of SFAS No. 123, which
provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to fair value
based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition,
SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require
prominent disclosures in annual financial statements about the method of
accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method
used on reported results. We have elected to continue to account for stock-based
compensation under APB No. 25, and related Interpretations under FIN 44 and
elect the disclosure-only alternative under SFAS No. 123 and the enhanced
disclosures as required by SFAS No. 148.
-19-
FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS
RISKS RELATED TO LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
IN CONNECTION WITH OUR RESTATEMENT OF THE HISTORICAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF
SMARTFORCE, CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS HAVE BEEN FILED AGAINST US AND ADDITIONAL
LAWSUITS MAY BE FILED, AND WE ARE THE SUBJECT OF A FORMAL ORDER OF PRIVATE
INVESTIGATION ENTERED BY THE SEC.
While preparing the closing balance sheet of SmartForce as at September 6, 2002,
the date on which we closed our merger with SkillSoft Corporation, certain
accounting matters were identified relating to the historical financial
statements of SmartForce (which, following the Merger, are no longer our
historical financial statements -- see Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated
Financial Statements). On November 19, 2002, we announced our intent to restate
the SmartForce financial statements for 1999, 2000, 2001 and the first two
quarters of 2002. Following this announcement, six lawsuits claiming to be class
actions were commenced against us and certain of our current and former
directors and officers, by or on behalf of persons claiming to be our
shareholders and persons claiming to have purchased or otherwise acquired our
securities at specified periods beginning as early as October 19, 1999 and
continuing after September 6, 2002. These lawsuits have been consolidated.
Additional lawsuits may be filed against us. Regardless of the outcome of the
consolidated action, it is likely that we will incur substantial defense costs
and that such actions will cause a diversion of our management's time and
attention. If we do not prevail in the case we could be required to pay
substantial damages or settlement costs, which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition or results of operation. We are unable at this
time to assess the validity of the claims or estimate the possible range of
damages that might be incurred as a result of the consolidated lawsuit. We have
not yet established any financial reserves relating to this lawsuit. We believe
that we have meritorious defenses to these actions and intend to defend
ourselves vigorously.
We are the subject of a formal order of private investigation entered by the
SEC. We are cooperating with the SEC in connection with this investigation. We
will likely incur substantial costs in connection with the SEC investigation,
which could cause a diversion of management time and attention. In addition, we
could be subject to substantial penalties, fines or regulatory sanctions, which
could adversely affect our business.
WE HAVE MISSED THE DEADLINE FOR THREE RECENT SEC FILINGS, WHICH HAS SEVERAL
ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES FOR US.
Our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2002 and our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 2003 were filed with
the SEC after their due dates. In addition, we were required to file an
amendment to our Current Report on Form 8-K relating to the SmartForce-SkillSoft
Corporation merger by November 22, 2002, and that amendment has not yet been
filed. Until we file our Form 8-K amendment, we will not be able to have a
registration statement under the Securities Act of 1933, covering a public
offering of securities, declared effective by the SEC, and we will not be able
to make offerings pursuant to existing registration statements (including
registration statements on Form S-8 covering employee stock plans), or pursuant
to certain "private placement" rules of the SEC under Regulation D, to any
purchasers not qualifying as "accredited investors". In addition, our affiliates
will not be able to sell our securities pursuant to Rule 144 under the
Securities Act until the Form 8-K amendment is filed. Finally, we will not be
eligible to use a "short form" registration statement on Form S-3 for a period
of 12 months after the time our Form 8-K amendment is filed. These restrictions
may impair our ability to raise funds, should we desire to do so, through an
equity financing and to attract and retain key employees.
OUR WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY, SKILLSOFT CORPORATION AND SEVERAL OF ITS
EXECUTIVES, THREE OF ITS KEY EMPLOYEES AND A FORMER MAJOR INVESTOR OF SKILLSOFT
CORPORATION ARE DEFENDANTS IN LITIGATION WITH NETG WHICH ALLEGES, AMONG OTHER
THINGS, MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE SECRETS; THIS LITIGATION WILL CONTINUE TO BE
COSTLY, MAY DIVERT THE EFFORTS OF OUR MANAGEMENT AND MAY ULTIMATELY RESTRICT OUR
ABILITY TO DO BUSINESS.
Our wholly owned subsidiary, SkillSoft Corporation, several of its executives,
three of its key employees and its former largest investor are defendants in a
lawsuit brought by National Education Training Group, Inc. (NETg), the former
employer of these individuals. NETg alleges in substance that various of the
defendants breached their fiduciary and contractual obligations to NETg in
connection with the organization and operation of SkillSoft Corporation,
misappropriated trade secrets from NETg, tortiously interfered with NETg's
business and employees and breached provisions of a license agreement with NETg
relating to the use of its software. NETg maintains that the trade secrets
allegedly misappropriated by SkillSoft Corporation and the other defendants
include, among other things:
- various aspects of the design and functionality of its education
and training software and products;
- customer lists and information;
- relationships with service providers; and
- NETg's soft skills product line business plan.
The claims seek injunctive relief against the defendants demanding the return,
and no future use by these defendants, of the alleged trade secrets. The claims
also seek compensatory damages of $400 million and exemplary damages in the
additional amount of $400 million, compensatory, incidental and consequential
damages in an unspecified amount and punitive damages totaling $50 million or
such other amount as the court deems just or appropriate. In answers to
interrogatories served on NETg, an expert witness retained by NETg opined that
NETg may, based on certain assumptions provided to the expert by NETg's counsel,
be entitled to two categories of damages for lost profits of up to $386.8
million and damages for unjust enrichment which could total up to $616.3
million. Named as defendants in the lawsuit, in addition to SkillSoft
Corporation, are Charles E. Moran, Jerald A. Nine, Jr., Mark A. Townsend, Lee A.
Ritze, Dennis E. Brown, Sally H. Hovis, Warburg, Pincus Ventures, L.P.
(Warburg), a major investor of SkillSoft Corporation, and each general partner
of Warburg.
In addition, NETg also filed suit against SkillSoft Corporation in July 2000
alleging that its educational and training software products infringe a patent
allegedly owned by NETg. The complaint seeks both monetary damages
-20-
and injunctive relief. SkillSoft Corporation filed an answer and a counterclaim
for a declaration of invalidity of the NETg patent. On April 17, 2001 SkillSoft
Corporation filed a request for reexamination of the patent in suit with the
United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). After a series of interim
actions by the PTO and filings by NETg, on April 10, 2002, the PTO issued an
office action rejecting all of the claims of the patent. In 2002, the lawsuit
was dismissed "without prejudice with leave to reinstate upon full and final
resolution of the reexamination proceedings" with the PTO. The patent owner's
appeal of the PTO's Office Action rejecting all the claims of the patent remains
pending.
If we do not prevail in the NETg cases it could have any or all of the
following significant adverse effects on our business and financial performance:
- injunctive relief against SkillSoft Corporation, us and our
officers and employees, which could significantly restrict our
ability to conduct our business;
- an adverse judgment against us for monetary damages;
- a settlement on unfavorable terms to us;
- our obligations to indemnify our employees and directors for liabilities
and expenses they incur in connection with the lawsuits;
- obligations to customers for breach of warranties of noninfringement; or
- a requirement to reengineer our products to avoid patent infringement,
which would likely result in additional expense and delay.
In addition, these cases, regardless of their outcome, will continue to result
in significant expenses in defending the lawsuits. Our legal expenses related to
the defense of these lawsuits totaled approximately $1.4 million in the fiscal
year ended January 31, 2001, $1.7 million in the fiscal year ended January 31,
2002 and $4.3 million in the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003. Moreover, these
lawsuits may divert the efforts and attention of our management team from normal
business operations. While there have been certain settlement discussions
between the parties in the lawsuits, at this time, the outcome of these
discussions cannot be predicted. Accordingly, we have not recorded any liability
related to this matter in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
PENDING AND ANY FUTURE CLAIMS THAT WE INFRINGE UPON THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
RIGHTS OF OTHERS COULD RESULT IN COSTLY LITIGATION OR ROYALTY PAYMENTS TO THIRD
PARTIES, OR REQUIRE US TO REENGINEER OR CEASE SALES OF OUR PRODUCTS OR SERVICES.
Third parties have in the past and could in the future claim that our current or
future products infringe their intellectual property rights. Any claim, with or
without merit, could result in costly litigation or require us to reengineer or
cease sales of our products or services, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business. Infringement claims could also result in an
injunction in the use of our products or require us to enter into royalty or
licensing agreements. Licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on
terms acceptable to the combined company or at all.
On June 13, 2002, Lionet Limited, a limited liability company incorporated and
doing business in Ireland, filed a claim against us in Dublin, alleging, among
other things, that we breached the terms of our software license agreement with
Lionet Limited in that we permitted or failed to prevent the decompilation of
the provided software products and have failed to cooperate in audits to
determine the nature of such alleged copying or de-compilation. Lionet Limited
is seeking damages for lost license fees of $6.8 million and seeks other
damages. We are in the process of reviewing the statement of claim and intend to
vigorously defend ourselves in this matter.
From time to time we learn of parties that claim broad intellectual property
rights in the e-Learning area that might implicate our offerings. These parties
or others could initiate actions against us in the future.
WE ARE SUBJECT TO OTHER PENDING LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND WE MAY BECOME SUBJECT TO
ADDITIONAL LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. ADVERSE DETERMINATIONS IN THESE PROCEEDINGS COULD
MATERIALLY HARM OUR BUSINESS.
Since the end of the third quarter of 1998, a class action lawsuit has been
pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of
California against us, one of our subsidiaries, SmartForce USA, and certain of
our former and current officers and directors, alleging violation of the federal
securities laws. It has been alleged in this lawsuit that we misrepresented or
omitted to state material facts regarding our business and financial condition
and prospects in order to artificially inflate and maintain the price of our
ADSs, and misrepresented or omitted to state material facts in our registration
statement and prospectus issued in connection with our merger with Forefront,
which also is alleged to have artificially inflated the price of our ADSs.
Although we cannot presently determine the outcome of this action, an adverse
resolution of this matter could significantly negatively impact our financial
position and results of operations. We believe that we have meritorious defenses
to this action and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.
We may be from time to time involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings,
which arise in the ordinary course of business. An adverse resolution of these
matters could significantly negatively impact our financial position and results
of operations.
-21-
WE COULD INCUR SUBSTANTIAL COSTS RESULTING FROM PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIMS
RELATING TO OUR CUSTOMERS' USE OF OUR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES.
Many of the business interactions supported by our products and services are
critical to our customers' businesses. Any failure in a customer's business
interaction or other collaborative activity caused or allegedly caused in the
future by our products and services could result in a claim for substantial
damages against us, regardless of our responsibility for the failure. Although
we maintain general liability insurance, including coverage for errors and
omissions, there can be no assurance that existing coverage will continue to be
available on reasonable terms or will be available in amounts sufficient to
cover one or more large claims, or that the insurer will not disclaim coverage
as to any future claim.
WE COULD BE SUBJECTED TO LEGAL ACTIONS BASED UPON THE CONTENT WE OBTAIN FROM
THIRD PARTIES OVER WHOM WE EXERT LIMITED CONTROL.
It is possible that we could become subject to legal actions based upon claims
that our course content infringes the rights of others or is erroneous. Any such
claims, with or without merit, could subject us to costly litigation and the
diversion of our financial resources and management personnel. The risk of such
claims is exacerbated by the fact that our course content is provided by third
parties over whom we exert limited control. Further, if those claims are
successful, we may be required to alter the content, pay financial damages or
obtain content from others.
RISKS RELATED TO THE MERGER BETWEEN SKILLSOFT CORPORATION AND SMARTFORCE
WE MAY NOT BE SUCCESSFUL IN COMPLETING FINAL ASPECTS OF THE INTEGRATION RELATED
TO THE BUSINESSES OPERATED BY SKILLSOFT CORPORATION AND SMARTFORCE PRIOR TO THE
MERGER AND, AS A RESULT, MAY NOT REALIZE BENEFITS FROM THE MERGER.
We have substantially completed many of the key aspects of the integration of
the businesses operated by SkillSoft Corporation and SmartForce prior to the
Merger, which was consummated on September 6, 2002. However, the ultimate
successful integration of the two businesses will require, among other things,
the following:
- completion of the integration of the two companies' products and
services, information and software systems and other operations;
- coordination of ongoing and future research and development efforts
and marketing activities;
- retention of existing customers of both companies and attraction of
additional customers;
- retention of strategic partners of each company and attraction of
new strategic partners;
- developing and maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures
and policies;
- identifying and eliminating redundant and underperforming
operations and assets;
- effectively leveraging our indirect sales presence;
- capitalizing on cross-selling opportunities;
- the successful migration of the companies' platforms;
- minimization of disruption of each company's ongoing business and
distraction of its management;
- limiting expenses related to integration; and
- improving its internal control environment due to challenges in the
integration.
We may not succeed in addressing these risks or any other problems encountered
in connection with the Merger. The diversion of the attention of management and
any difficulties encountered in the process of combining the companies could
cause the disruption of, or a loss of momentum in, the activities of our
business or could cause the impairment of relationships with customers and
business partners. Further, the process of combining the two companies'
businesses could negatively affect employee morale and our ability to retain
some key employees, and could cause customers to cancel existing license
agreements or choose not to purchase new products from us. In addition, we
intend to develop new products and services that combine both companies' assets.
Difficulties in combining the technology, products and service offerings of the
two companies could result in disruption of customer service and longer sales
cycles and product implementations, which could cause existing customers to
reduce or cease doing business with us altogether, and could cause revenue and
operating income to fluctuate and fail to meet expectations.
-22-
CERTAIN ASPECTS OF THE MERGER COULD HARM OUR FINANCIAL RESULTS.
In connection with the Merger, certain aspects of the integration of the two
companies moving forward could harm our financial results. For example, we have
made certain changes in contracting practices, which will have attendant
accounting implications. For example, prior to the Merger, SmartForce recorded
license revenues with respect to contracts that provide for perpetual licenses
to software at the time that it sold the perpetual licenses. Since the Merger,
we have been delivering perpetual licenses as part of a bundled offering
including services. As a result, the revenue from both the perpetual licenses
and services will be recognized as revenues as the services are delivered over
time. This means that rather than recognizing substantial license revenue at the
time of the execution of these contracts, we will now recognize license revenue
ratably over the term of these contracts. In addition, due to purchase
accounting in connection with the Merger, a portion of the SmartForce deferred
revenue as of September 6, 2002 was reclassified to goodwill and will therefore
not be recognized as revenue.
As a result of the integration, we may not obtain some revenue we otherwise
might have obtained. For example, although the products and customer bases of
the two companies are complementary and should provide us with numerous cross
selling opportunities, we do expect some degree of commercial overlap that could
negatively impact revenue. Also, we intend to de-emphasize customer service
revenue activities to focus on higher margin segments of the business, which we
expect will result in lost revenue. In addition, volume discounting of mutual
customers now combined as a result of the Merger may result in lower revenues.
If the benefits of the Merger do not exceed the associated costs, including
costs associated with integrating the two companies, lost or deferred revenues
and dilution of our shareholders resulting from the issuance of our ADSs in
connection with the Merger, our financial results, including earnings per share,
could be materially harmed.
IF WE ARE UNABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF OPPORTUNITIES TO MARKET AND SELL THE
PRODUCTS AND SERVICES OF THE TWO COMPANIES TO EACH OTHER'S TRADITIONAL
CUSTOMERS, DISTRIBUTION CHANNELS AND BUSINESS PARTNERS, WE MAY NOT REALIZE SOME
OF THE EXPECTED BENEFITS OF THE MERGER.
Prior to the Merger, we and SkillSoft Corporation each maintained separate and
distinct customer bases, distribution channels and business partners specific to
our respective businesses. Following the Merger, we are attempting to take
advantage of the customer bases and distribution channels of the formerly
separate businesses in order to promote and sell the products and services of
one company to the traditional customers and business partners of the other
company. The products and services of the two companies are highly technical and
the salespersons of one company may not be successful in marketing the products
and services of the other company. In the event that the traditional customers
and business partners of either company are not receptive to the products and
services of the other, we may not realize some of the expected benefits of the
merger, and our business may be harmed.
WE ARE OPERATING UNDER A NEW NAME, WHICH MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR BUSINESS.
Following the consummation of the Merger, we changed our name from SmartForce
PLC to SkillSoft PLC. The adoption of this new name may prevent us from taking
advantage of certain goodwill existing customers and strategic partners
associate with our former name. Further, we expect to incur an expense in
effecting the name change and in marketing efforts to promote brand recognition
of the new name.
RISKS RELATED TO THE OPERATION OF OUR BUSINESS
WE AND SKILLSOFT CORPORATION HAVE EXPERIENCED NET LOSSES IN THE PAST, AND WE MAY
BE UNABLE TO ACHIEVE OR MAINTAIN PROFITABILITY.
SmartForce incurred substantial net losses both recently and in the past,
including net losses of $37.7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2002
and $19.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2002. SkillSoft
Corporation incurred substantial net losses in every fiscal quarter prior to its
fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2002. In addition, the combined company
recorded a net loss of $284 million for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2003
and $12.6 million for the quarter ended April 30, 2003. We expect to incur
significant expenses in connection with the completion of the migration to a
unified platform and the continued expansion of this combined business, and, as
a result, the business will need to generate significant revenues to achieve and
maintain profitability. We cannot guarantee whether our combined business will
achieve or sustain profitability in any future period.
OUR QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS MAY FLUCTUATE SIGNIFICANTLY. THIS LIMITS YOUR
ABILITY TO EVALUATE HISTORICAL FINANCIAL RESULTS AND INCREASES THE LIKELIHOOD
THAT OUR RESULTS WILL FALL BELOW MARKET ANALYSTS' EXPECTATIONS, WHICH COULD
CAUSE THE PRICE OF OUR ADSS TO DROP RAPIDLY AND SEVERELY.
We have in the past experienced fluctuations in our quarterly operating results,
and we anticipate that these fluctuations will continue. As a result, we believe
that our quarterly revenue, expenses and operating results are likely to vary
significantly in the future. If in some future quarters our results of
operations are below the expectations of public market analysts and investors,
this could have a severe adverse effect on the market price of our ADSs.
Our operating results have historically fluctuated, and our operating results
may in the future continue to fluctuate, as a result of factors, which include:
- the size and timing of new/renewal agreements and upgrades;
- royalty rates;
- the announcement, introduction and acceptance of new products,
product enhancements and technologies by us and our competitors;
- the mix of sales between our field sales force, our other direct
sales channels and our telesales channels;
- general conditions in the U.S. or the international economy;
-23-
- the loss of significant customers;
- delays in availability of new products;
- product or service quality problems;
- seasonality -- due to the budget and purchasing cycles of our
customers, we expect our revenue and operating results will
generally be strongest in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year and
weakest in the first quarter;
- the spending patterns of our customers;
- litigation costs and expenses, including the costs related to the
restatement of the SmartForce financial statements;
- non-recurring charges related to acquisitions;
- growing competition that may result in price reductions; and
- currency fluctuations.
Most of our expenses, such as rent and most employee compensation, do not vary
directly with revenue and are difficult to adjust in the short-term. As a
result, if revenue for a particular quarter is below our expectations, we could
not proportionately reduce operating expenses for that quarter. Any such revenue
shortfall would, therefore, have a disproportionate effect on our expected
operating results for that quarter.
DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCTS AND SERVICES MAY BE ESPECIALLY SUSCEPTIBLE TO ADVERSE
ECONOMIC CONDITIONS.
Our business and financial performance may be damaged by adverse financial
conditions affecting our target customers or by a general weakening of the
economy. Companies may not view training products and services as critical to
the success of their businesses. If these companies experience disappointing
operating results, whether as a result of adverse economic conditions,
competitive issues or other factors, they may decrease or forego education and
training expenditures before limiting their other expenditures or in conjunction
with lowering other expenses.
WE RELY ON A LIMITED NUMBER OF THIRD PARTIES TO PROVIDE US WITH EDUCATIONAL
CONTENT FOR OUR COURSES AND REFERENCEWARE, AND OUR ALLIANCES WITH THESE THIRD
PARTIES MAY BE TERMINATED OR FAIL TO MEET OUR REQUIREMENTS.
We rely on a limited number of independent third parties to provide us with the
educational content for a majority of our courses based on learning objectives
and specific instructional design templates that we provide to them. We do not
have exclusive arrangements or long-term contracts with any of these content
providers. If one or more of our third party content providers were to stop
working with us, we would have to rely on other parties to develop our course
content. In addition, these providers may fail to develop new courses or
existing courses on a timely basis. We cannot predict whether new content or
enhancements would be available from reliable alternative sources on reasonable
terms. In addition, Books relies on third party publishers to provide all of the
content incorporated into its Referenceware products. If one or more of these
publishers were to terminate their license with us, we may not be able to find
substitute publishers for such content. In addition, we may be forced to pay
increased royalties to these publishers to continue our licenses with them.
In the event that we are unable to maintain or expand our current development
alliances or enter into new development alliances, our operating results and
financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Furthermore, we will
be required to pay royalties to some of our development partners on products
developed with them, which could reduce our gross margins. We expect that cost
of revenues may fluctuate from period to period in the future based upon many
factors, including the revenue mix and the timing of expenses associated with
development alliances. In addition, the collaborative nature of the development
process under these alliances may result in longer development times and less
control over the timing of product introductions than for e-Learning offerings
developed solely by us. Our strategic alliance partners may from time to time
renegotiate the terms of their agreements with us, which could result in changes
to the royalty or other arrangements, adversely affecting our results of
operations.
The independent third party strategic partners we rely on for educational
content and product marketing may compete with us, harming our results of
operations. Our agreements with these third parties generally do not restrict
them from developing courses on similar topics for our competitors or from
competing directly with us. As a result, our competitors may be able to
duplicate some of our course content and gain a competitive advantage.
WE RELY ON STRATEGIC ALLIANCES FOR MARKETING, WHICH ALLIANCES ARE NOT EXCLUSIVE,
MAY BE TERMINATED OR MAY FAIL TO MEET OUR REQUIREMENTS IN THE FUTURE.
We have developed strategic alliances to market many of our products. However,
these relationships are not exclusive, and our marketing partners could market
other products in preference to, and in competition with, those developed by us.
In addition, we may be unable to continue to market future products through
these alliances or may be unable to negotiate additional alliances in the future
on acceptable terms, if at all. The marketing efforts of our strategic partners
may also disrupt our direct sales efforts.
-24-
OUR SUCCESS DEPENDS ON OUR ABILITY TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE RAPIDLY CHANGING
MARKET.
The market for education and training software is characterized by rapidly
changing technology, evolving industry standards, changes in customer
requirements and preferences and frequent introductions of new products and
services embodying new technologies. New methods of providing interactive
education in a technology-based format are being developed and offered in the
marketplace, including intranet and Internet offerings. In addition, multimedia
and other product functionality features are being added to educational
software. Our future success will depend upon the extent to which we are able to
develop and implement products which address these emerging market requirements
on a cost effective and timely basis. Product development is risky because it is
difficult to foresee developments in technology, coordinate technical personnel
and identify and eliminate design flaws. Any significant delay in releasing new
products could have a material adverse effect on the ultimate success of our
products and could reduce sales of predecessor products. We may not be
successful in introducing new products on a timely basis. In addition, new
products introduced by us may fail to achieve a significant degree of market
acceptance or, once accepted, may fail to sustain viability in the market for
any significant period. If we are unsuccessful in addressing the changing needs
of the marketplace due to resource, technological or other constraints, or in
anticipating and responding adequately to changes in customers' software
technology and preferences, our business and results of operations would be
materially adversely affected.
THE E-LEARNING MARKET IS A DEVELOPING MARKET, AND OUR BUSINESS WILL SUFFER IF
E-LEARNING IS NOT WIDELY ACCEPTED.
The market for e-Learning is a new and emerging market. Corporate training and
education have historically been conducted primarily through classroom
instruction and have traditionally been performed by a company's internal
personnel. Many companies have invested heavily in their current training
solutions. Although technology-based training applications have been available
for several years, they currently account for only a small portion of the
overall training market.
Accordingly, our future success will depend upon the extent to which companies
adopt technology-based solutions for their training activities, and the extent
to which companies utilize the services or purchase products of third-party
providers. Many companies that have already invested substantial resources in
traditional methods of corporate training may be reluctant to adopt a new
strategy that may compete with their existing investments. Even if companies
implement technology-based training or e-Learning solutions, they may still
choose to design, develop, deliver or manage all or part of their education and
training internally. If technology-based learning does not become widespread, or
if companies do not use the products and services of third parties to develop,
deliver or manage their training needs, then our products and service may not
achieve commercial success.
THE SUCCESS OF OUR E-LEARNING STRATEGY DEPENDS ON THE RELIABILITY AND CONSISTENT
PERFORMANCE OF OUR INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND INTERNET INFRASTRUCTURE.
The success of our e-Learning strategy is highly dependent on the consistent
performance of our information systems and Internet infrastructure. If our Web
site fails for any reason or if it experiences any unscheduled downtimes, even
for only a short period, our business and reputation could be materially harmed.
We have in the past experienced performance problems and unscheduled downtime,
and these problems could recur. We currently rely on third parties for proper
functioning of computer infrastructure, delivery of our e-Learning applications
and the performance of our destination site. Our systems and operations could be
damaged or interrupted by fire, flood, power loss, telecommunications failure,
break-ins, earthquake, financial patterns of hosting providers and similar
events. Any system failures could adversely affect customer usage of our
solutions and user traffic results in any future quarters, which could adversely
affect our revenues and operating results and harm our reputation with corporate
customers, subscribers and commerce partners. Accordingly, the satisfactory
performance, reliability and availability of our Web site and computer
infrastructure is critical to our reputation and ability to attract and retain
corporate customers, subscribers and commerce partners. We cannot accurately
project the rate or timing of any increases in traffic to our Web site and,
therefore, the integration and timing of any upgrades or enhancements required
to facilitate any significant traffic increase to the Web site are uncertain. We
have in the past experienced difficulties in upgrading our Web site
infrastructure to handle increased traffic, and these difficulties could recur.
The failure to expand and upgrade our Web site or any system error, failure or
extended down time could materially harm our business, reputation, financial
condition or results of operations.
BECAUSE MANY USERS OF OUR E-LEARNING SOLUTIONS WILL ACCESS THEM OVER THE
INTERNET, FACTORS ADVERSELY AFFECTING THE USE OF THE INTERNET OR OUR CUSTOMERS'
NETWORKING INFRASTRUCTURES COULD HARM OUR BUSINESS.
Many of our customer's users access our e-Learning solutions over the Internet
or through our customers' internal networks. Any factors that adversely affect
Internet usage could disrupt the ability of those users to access our e-Learning
solutions, which would adversely affect customer satisfaction and therefore our
business.
For example, our ability to increase the effectiveness and scope of our services
to customers is ultimately limited by the speed and reliability of both the
Internet and our customers' internal networks. Consequently, the emergence and
growth of the market for our products and services depends upon the improvements
being made to the entire Internet as well as to its individual customers'
networking infrastructures to alleviate overloading and congestion. If these
improvements are not made, and the quality of networks degrades, the ability of
our customers to use our products and services will be hindered and our revenues
may suffer.
-25-
Additionally, a requirement for the continued growth of accessing e-Learning
solutions over the Internet is the secure transmission of confidential
information over public networks. Failure to prevent security breaches into our
products or our customers' networks, or well-publicized security breaches
affecting the Internet in general could significantly harm our growth and
revenue. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of
cryptography or other developments may result in a compromise of technology we
use to protect content and transactions, our products or our customers'
proprietary information in our databases. Anyone who is able to circumvent our
security measures could misappropriate proprietary and confidential information
or could cause interruptions in our operations. We may be required to expend
significant capital and other resources to protect against such security
breaches or to address problems caused by security breaches. The privacy of
users may also deter people from using the Internet to conduct transactions that
involve transmitting confidential information.
OUR RESTRUCTURING PLANS MAY BE INEFFECTIVE OR MAY LIMIT OUR ABILITY TO COMPETE.
In connection with the Merger, we recorded $30.3 million in merger and exit
costs and $19.3 million of restructuring and other non-recurring charges. There
are several risks inherent in these efforts to transition to a new cost
structure. These include the risk that we will not be successful in restoring
profitability, and hence we may have to undertake further restructuring
initiatives that would entail additional charges and create additional risks. In
addition, there is the risk that cost-cutting initiatives will impair our
ability to effectively develop and market products and remain competitive. Each
of the above measures could have long-term effects on our business by reducing
our pool of talent, decreasing or slowing improvements in our products, making
it more difficult for us to respond to customers, limiting our ability to
increase production quickly if and when the demand for our products increases
and limiting our ability to hire and retain key personnel. These circumstances
could cause our earnings to be lower than they otherwise might be.
WE DEPEND ON A FEW KEY PERSONNEL TO MANAGE AND OPERATE THE BUSINESS AND MUST BE
ABLE TO ATTRACT AND RETAIN HIGHLY QUALIFIED EMPLOYEES.
Our success is largely dependent on the personal efforts and abilities of our
senior management. Failure to retain these executives, or the loss of certain
additional senior management personnel or other key employees, could have a
material adverse effect on our business and future prospects. In addition,
certain of our senior executives left the company in connection with the Merger.
If we fail to adequately replace these executives or fail to manage the
transition to new management effectively, our results of operations could be
negatively affected.
We are also dependent on the continued service of our key sales, content
development and operational personnel and on our ability to attract, train,
motivate and retain highly qualified employees. In addition, we depend on
writers, programmers, Web designers and graphic artists. We may be unsuccessful
in attracting, training, retaining or motivating key personnel. In particular,
the negative consequences (including litigation) of having to restate
SmartForce's historical financial statements, uncertainties surrounding the
Merger, and our recent adverse operating results and stock price performance
could create uncertainties that materially and adversely affect our ability to
attract and retain key personnel. The inability to hire, train and retain
qualified personnel or the loss of the services of key personnel could have a
material adverse effect upon our business, new product development efforts and
future business prospects.
CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS REGARDING STOCK OPTION PLANS COULD LIMIT THE
DESIRABILITY OF GRANTING STOCK OPTIONS, WHICH COULD HARM OUR ABILITY TO ATTRACT
AND RETAIN EMPLOYEES, AND COULD ALSO REDUCE OUR PROFITABILITY.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board is considering whether to require all
companies to treat the value of stock options granted to employees as an
expense. The United States Congress and other governmental and regulatory
authorities have also considered requiring companies to expense stock options.
If this change were to become mandatory, we and other companies would be
required to record a compensation expense equal to the value of each stock
option granted. This expense would be spread over the vesting period of the
stock option. Currently, we are generally not required to record compensation
expenses in connection with stock option grants. If we were required to expense
stock option grants, it would reduce the attractiveness of granting stock
options because the additional expense associated with these grants would reduce
our profitability. However, stock options are an important employee recruitment
and retention tool, and we may not be able to attract and retain key personnel
if we reduce the scope of our employee stock option program. Accordingly, in the
event we are required to expense stock option grants, either our profitability,
or our ability to use stock options as an employee recruitment and retention
tool would be adversely impacted.
INCREASED COMPETITION MAY RESULT IN DECREASED DEMAND FOR OUR PRODUCTS AND
SERVICES, WHICH MAY RESULT IN REDUCED REVENUES AND GROSS MARGINS AND LOSS OR
MARKET SHARE.
The market for corporate education and training solutions is highly fragmented
and competitive. We expect the market to become increasingly competitive due to
the lack of significant barriers to entry. In addition to increased competition
from new companies entering into the market, established companies are entering
into the market through acquisitions of smaller companies, which directly
compete with us, and this trend is expected to continue. We may also face
competition from publishing companies and vendors of application software,
including those vendors with whom we have formed development and marketing
alliances.
Our primary sources of direct competition are:
- third-party suppliers of instructor-led information technology,
business, management and professional skills education and training;
- suppliers of computer-based training and e-Learning solutions;
- internal education and training departments of potential customers;
and
-26-
- value-added resellers and network integrators.
Growing competition may result in price reductions, reduced revenue and gross
margins and loss of market share, any one of which would have a material adverse
effect on our business. Many of our current and potential competitors have
substantially greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other
resources, as well as greater name recognition, and we expect to face increasing
price pressures from competitors as managers demand more value for their
training budgets. Accordingly, we may be unable to provide e-Learning solutions
that compare favorably with new instructor-led techniques, other interactive
training software or new e-Learning solutions.
OUR BUSINESS IS SUBJECT TO CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS THAT COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR
OPERATING RESULTS.
Due to our multinational operations, our operating results are subject to
fluctuations based upon changes in the exchange rates between the currencies in
which revenues are collected or expenses are paid. In particular, the value of
the U.S. dollar against the euro and related currencies will impact our
operating results. Our expenses will not necessarily be incurred in the currency
in which revenue is generated, and, as a result, we will be required from time
to time to convert currencies to meet our obligations. These currency
conversions are subject to exchange rate fluctuations, and changes to the value
of the euro, pound sterling and other currencies relative to the U.S. dollar
could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
OUR CORPORATE TAX RATE MAY INCREASE, WHICH COULD ADVERSELY AFFECT OUR CASH FLOW,
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Our corporate tax rate may increase, which could adversely affect our cash flow,
financial condition and results of operations. We currently have significant
foreign operations and generate a majority of our taxable income in Ireland, and
some of our Irish operating subsidiaries are taxed at rates substantially lower
than tax rates in effect in the United States and other countries in which we
have operations. As we have substantial assets and properties located in, and
our business operations are principally conducted in, the United States, we are
in the process of exploring the reorganization of our operations and
repatriating certain assets to Ireland in order to maintain an effective tax
rate at the level currently applicable to us. If we are unable to effect such a
reorganization, or if at any time our Irish subsidiaries were no longer to
qualify for these lower tax rates or if the applicable tax laws were rescinded
or later changed, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.
Moreover, because we will incur income tax in several countries, an increase in
our profitability in one or more of these countries could result in a higher
overall tax rate. In addition, if U.S. or other foreign tax authorities were to
change applicable tax laws or successfully challenge the manner in which our
subsidiaries' profits are currently recognized, our taxes could increase, and
our business, cash flow, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially adversely affected. In addition, there may be limitations imposed on
the level and timing of the utilization of historic net operating losses for tax
purposes as a result of the Merger. These limitations may adversely impact cash
flow depending on the extent of any such limitation.
WE MAY BE UNABLE TO PROTECT OUR PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. UNAUTHORIZED USE OF OUR
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MAY RESULT IN DEVELOPMENT OF PRODUCTS OR SERVICES THAT
COMPETE WITH OURS.
Our success depends to a degree upon the protection of our rights in
intellectual property. We rely upon a combination of patent, copyright, and
trademark laws to protect our proprietary rights. We have also entered into, and
will continue to enter into, confidentiality agreements with our employees,
consultants and third parties to seek to limit and protect the distribution of
confidential information. However, we have not signed protective agreements in
every case.
Although we have taken steps to protect our proprietary rights, these steps may
be inadequate. Existing patent, copyright, and trademark laws offer only limited
protection. Moreover, the laws of other countries in which we market our
products may afford little or no effective protection of our intellectual
property. Additionally, unauthorized parties may copy aspects of our products,
services or technology or obtain and use information that we regard as
proprietary. Other parties may also breach protective contracts we have executed
or will in the future execute. We may not become aware of, or have adequate
remedies in the event of, a breach. Litigation may be necessary in the future to
enforce or to determine the validity and scope of our intellectual property
rights or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of
others. Even if we were to prevail, such litigation could result in substantial
costs and diversion of management and technical resources.
OUR NON-U.S. OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO RISKS WHICH COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR
FUTURE OPERATING RESULTS.
We expect that international operations will continue to account for a
significant portion of our revenues. Operations outside of the United States are
subject to inherent risks, including:
- difficulties or delays in developing and supporting non-English
language versions of our products and services;
- political and economic conditions in various jurisdictions;
- difficulties in staffing and managing foreign subsidiary
operations;
- longer sales cycles and account receivable payment cycles;
- multiple, conflicting and changing governmental laws and
regulations;
- foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations;
- protectionist laws and business practices that may favor local
competitors;
- difficulties in finding and managing local resellers;
-27-
- potential adverse tax consequences; and
- the absence or significant lack of legal protection for
intellectual property rights.
Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our future
operations outside of the United States, which could negatively impact our
future operating results.
THE MARKET PRICE OF OUR ADSS MAY FLUCTUATE AND MAY NOT BE SUSTAINABLE.
The market price of our ADSs has fluctuated significantly since our initial
public offering and is likely to continue to be volatile. In addition, in recent
years the stock market in general, and the market for shares of technology
stocks in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations,
which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of affected
companies. The market price of our ADSs may continue to experience significant
fluctuations in the future, including fluctuations that are unrelated to our
performance. As a result of these fluctuations in the price of our ADSs, it is
difficult to predict what the price of our ADSs will be at any point in the
future, and you may not be able to sell your ADSs at or above the price that you
paid for them.
OUR SALES CYCLE MAY MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO PREDICT OUR OPERATING RESULTS.
The period between our initial contact with a potential customer and the
purchase of our products (not including SmartCertify) by that customer typically
ranges from three to twelve months. Factors that contribute to our long sales
cycle, include:
- our need to educate potential customers about the benefits of our
products;
- competitive evaluations by customers;
- the customers' internal budgeting and approval processes;
- the fact that many customers view training products as
discretionary spending, rather than purchases essential to their
business; and
- the fact that we target large companies, which often take longer to
make purchasing decisions due to the size and complexity of the
enterprise.
These long sales cycles, which typically range from three to twelve months or
more, make it difficult to predict the quarter in which sales may occur. Delays
in sales could cause significant variability in our revenues and operating
results for any particular period.
OUR BUSINESS COULD BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED IF OUR PRODUCTS CONTAIN ERRORS.
Software products as complex as ours contain known and undetected errors or
"bugs" that result in product failures. The existence of bugs could result in
loss of or delay in revenues, loss of market share, diversion of product
development resources, injury to reputation or damage to efforts to build brand
awareness, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results and financial condition.
THE CONVICTION OF ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP ON OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE CHARGES MAY
ADVERSELY AFFECT ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP'S ABILITY TO SATISFY ANY CLAIMS ARISING
FROM THE PROVISION OF AUDITING SERVICES TO SKILLSOFT CORPORATION AND MAY IMPEDE
OUR ACCESS TO CAPITAL MARKETS AFTER THE MERGER.
Arthur Andersen LLP audited SkillSoft Corporation's financial statements for the
fiscal years ended January 31, 2002, January 31, 2001 and January 31, 2000. On
March 14, 2002, an indictment was unsealed charging it with federal obstruction
of justice arising from the government's investigation of Enron Corp. On June
15, 2002, Arthur Andersen LLP was convicted of these charges. It is possible
that the effect of this conviction on Arthur Andersen LLP's financial condition
may adversely affect the ability of Arthur Andersen LLP to satisfy any claims
arising from its provision of auditing services to SkillSoft Corporation.
Should we seek to access the public capital markets, SEC rules will require us
to include or incorporate by reference in any prospectus three years of audited
financial statements. The SEC's current rules would require us to present
audited financial statements for one or more fiscal years audited by Arthur
Andersen LLP and use reasonable efforts to obtain its consent until the audited
financial statements for the fiscal year ending January 31, 2005 become
available. If prior to that time the SEC ceases accepting financial statements
audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, it is possible that the available audited
financial statements for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2002, January 31,
2001 and January 31, 2000 audited by Arthur Andersen LLP might not satisfy the
SEC's requirements. In that case, we would be unable to access the public
capital markets unless Ernst & Young LLP, our current independent accounting
firm, or another independent accounting firm, is able to audit the financial
statements originally audited by Arthur Andersen LLP. Any delay or inability to
access the public capital markets caused by these circumstances could have a
material adverse effect on our business, profitability and growth prospects.
ITEM 3. - QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As of April 30, 2003, we did not use derivative financial instruments for
speculative or trading purposes.
INTEREST RATE RISK
Our general investing policy is to limit the risk of principal loss and to
ensure the safety of invested funds by limiting market and credit risk. We
currently use a registered investment manager to place our investments in highly
liquid money market accounts and government-backed securities. All highly liquid
investments with original maturities of three months or less are considered to
be cash equivalents. Interest income is sensitive to changes in the general
level of U.S. interest rates. Based on the short-term nature of our investments,
we have concluded that there is no significant market risk exposure.
-28-
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
Due to our multinational operations, our business is subject to fluctuations
based upon changes in the exchange rates between the currencies in which we
collect revenues or pay expenses and the U.S. dollar. Our expenses are not
necessarily incurred in the currency in which revenue is generated, and, as a
result, we are required from time to time to convert currencies to meet our
obligations. These currency conversions are subject to exchange rate
fluctuations, in particular changes to the value of the euro, Canadian dollar
and pound sterling relative to the U.S. dollar, which could adversely affect our
business and the results of operations.
ITEM 4. - CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Following the merger of SmartForce PLC and SkillSoft Corporation on September 6,
2002, we integrated the business processes, human resources, disclosure controls
and procedures, and internal controls of the two companies. During this process,
significant deficiencies in disclosure controls and procedures and internal
controls were identified predominantly with respect to financial reporting at
non-U.S. subsidiaries of the former SmartForce PLC and our ability to process
the consolidated financial closing cycle. These deficiencies resulted in a
significant strain to the internal resources and on the infrastructure of the
finance organization and adversely impacted the year-end financial closing
process. External resources were engaged to assist management in the year-end
financial closing process and in identifying areas for improvement. In addition,
permanent resources and accounting process improvements have been and will
continue to be added and implemented to improve the non-U.S. finance operations,
the financial closing process, and the overall internal control environment.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and with the assistance
of outside consultants, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days prior to the
filing date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these
disclosure controls and procedures need significant improvements with respect to
certain aspects of our financial reporting at predominantly the non-U.S.
subsidiaries of the former SmartForce PLC and in our ability to process the
consolidated financial closing cycle. Our independent auditors have informed us
that they believe we have material weaknesses and reportable events in internal
control in certain of these areas. We have implemented interim mitigating
control procedures as part of the process of preparing our financial statements
for the quarter ended April 30, 2003 and the year ended January 31, 2003.
Although progress has been made, additional changes to the disclosure controls
and procedures, and internal controls will be on-going.
PART II
ITEM 1. - LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
SEC INVESTIGATION
On or about February 4, 2003, the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) informed
us that we are the subject of a formal order of private investigation relating
to our November 19, 2002 announcement that we would restate the financial
statements of SmartForce PLC for the period 1999 through June 2002. We
understand that the SEC's investigation concerns SmartForce's financial
disclosure and accounting during that period, other related matters, compliance
with rules governing reports required to be filed with the SEC, and the conduct
of those responsible for such matters. We continue to cooperate with the SEC in
this matter.
CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS
Six class action lawsuits have been filed against us and certain of our
current and former officers and directors captioned: (1) Gianni Angeloni v.
SmartForce PLC d/b/a SkillSoft, William McCabe and Greg Priest; (2) Ari R.
Schloss v. SkillSoft PLC f/k/a SmartForce PLC, Gregory M. Priest, Patrick E.
Murphy, David C. Drummond and William G. McCabe; (3) Joseph J. Bish v.
SmartForce PLC d/b/a SkillSoft, Gregory M. Priest, William G. McCabe, David C.
Drummond, John M. Grillos, John P. Hayes and Patrick E. Murphy; (4) Stacey Cohen
v. SmartForce PLC d/b/a SkillSoft, William G. McCabe and Greg Priest; (5) Daniel
Schmelz v. SmartForce PLC d/b/a SkillSoft, William G. McCabe and Greg Priest;
and (6) John O'Donoghue v. SmartForce PLC d/b/a SkillSoft, William G. McCabe and
Greg Priest. Each lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the
District of New Hampshire; the first action was filed on November 22, 2002, the
second action was filed on December 4, 2002 and the third and fourth actions
were filed on December 11, 2002, the fifth action was filed on December 23,
2002, and the sixth action was filed on January 16, 2003. These lawsuits allege
that we misrepresented or omitted to state material facts in our SEC filings and
press releases regarding our revenues and earnings and failed to correct such
false and misleading SEC filings and press releases, which are alleged to have
artificially inflated the price of our ADSs. These lawsuits seek unspecified
monetary damages, including punitive damages together with interest, costs, fees
and expenses. These lawsuits have all been assigned to Chief Judge Paul J.
Barbadoro. On March 26, 2003, Judge Barbadoro consolidated the lawsuits under
the caption "In re SmartForce Securities Litigation," Civil Action No. 02-544-B,
appointed as lead plaintiffs the Teacher's Retirement System of Louisiana and
the Louisiana Sheriff's Pension & Relief Fund, and approved the lead plaintiffs'
choice of lead counsel and local counsel. We are awaiting plaintiffs'
consolidated amended complaint. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to
these actions and intend to defend ourselves vigorously.
-29-
At the end of our fiscal third quarter of 1998, several purported class action
lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of California against us, one of our subsidiaries and certain of our
former and current officers and directors alleging violations of the federal
securities laws. It has been alleged in these lawsuits that we misrepresented or
omitted to state material facts regarding our business and financial condition
and prospects in order to artificially inflate and maintain the price of our
ADSs, and misrepresented or omitted to state material facts in our registration
statement and prospectus issued in connection with our merger with ForeFront,
which also is alleged to have artificially inflated the price of our ADSs. The
court has set a trial date of September 2003. We believe that we have
meritorious defenses to these actions and intend to vigorously defend ourselves
against them. Although we cannot presently determine the outcome of these
actions, an adverse resolution of these matters could significantly negatively
impact our financial position and results of operations.
NETG LITIGATION
Our subsidiary, SkillSoft Corporation, several of its executive officers and key
employees, and a former major investor of SkillSoft Corporation are named as
defendants in a lawsuit pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois
filed by National Education Training Group, Inc. ("NETg"), the former employer
of several of those individuals.
NETg's most recent complaint alleges in substance that:
- Charles E. Moran, as the former President of NETg, breached his
fiduciary duty to NETg by usurping NETg's corporate opportunities,
by commencing a rival business while still employed by NETg and by
soliciting NETg personnel to join his rival business while still
employed by NETg;
- Jerald A. Nine, as the former Vice President of Sales and Marketing
of NETg, breached his fiduciary duty to NETg by assisting Mr. Moran
in the creation, commencement and operation of the rival concern
prior to Mr. Nine's resignation from NETg, by assisting Mr. Moran
in the usurpation of corporate opportunities, by failing to inform
his superiors at NETg of Mr. Moran's plans to form a rival business
and by otherwise failing to use his best efforts on behalf of NETg
while still employed there;
- SkillSoft Corporation, Mr. Moran, Mr. Nine, Mark A. Townsend,
Dennis E. Brown, Lee A. Ritze and Sally Hovis misappropriated trade
secrets of NETg, and SkillSoft Corporation and Mr. Moran tortiously
interfered with NETg's "prospective economic advantage;"
- Mr. Moran, Mr. Townsend, Mr. Nine, Mr. Ritze, Mr. Brown and Ms.
Hovis breached certain confidentiality and proprietary matters
policies of NETg by misappropriating trade secrets and disclosing
confidential and proprietary information during and after their
employment with NETg;
- Mr. Moran, Mr. Townsend, Mr. Nine, Mr. Ritze and Mr. Brown breached
the conflict of interest policy of NETg's former corporate parent,
National Education Corporation, by failing to disclose that Mr.
Moran formed and solicited funding for SkillSoft Corporation, that
Messrs. Townsend, Nine, Ritze and Brown had employment-related
discussions with SkillSoft Corporation, and that Mr. Nine
participated in forming and soliciting funding for SkillSoft
Corporation, during their employment with NETg;
- SkillSoft Corporation and Mr. Moran tortiously interfered with
NETg's contractual relations with Mr. Townsend, Mr. Nine, Mr.
Brown, Mr. Ritze and Ms. Hovis by offering them employment and
inducing them to breach their confidentiality and trade secret
obligations to NETg;
- SkillSoft Corporation breached provisions of a license agreement
with NETg relating to the use of NETg's software; and
- Warburg Pincus Ventures, L.P., a former major investor in SkillSoft
Corporation, tortiously interfered with Mr. Moran's and Mr. Nine's
fiduciary duties to NETg.
-30-
NETg maintains that the trade secrets allegedly misappropriated by the
other defendants and SkillSoft Corporation include, among other things:
- various aspects of the design and functionality of its education
and training software and products;
- customer lists and information;
- relationships with service providers; and
- NETg's soft skills product line business plan.
The claims seek injunctive relief against SkillSoft Corporation and Messrs.
Moran, Nine, Townsend, Brown and Ritze and Ms. Hovis and demand the return, and
no future use by SkillSoft Corporation and these defendants, of the alleged
trade secrets. The claims also seek compensatory damages of $400 million,
exemplary damages in the additional amount of $400 million, additional
compensatory, incidental and consequential damages in an unspecified amount and
punitive damages of $50 million or such other amount as the court deems just or
appropriate. In answers to interrogatories served on NETg, an expert witness
retained by NETg opined that NETg may, based on certain assumptions provided to
the expert by NETg's counsel, be entitled to two categories of damages,
including damages for lost profits of up to $386.8 million and damages for
unjust enrichment of up to $616.3 million. On April 30, 2001, the court denied
SkillSoft Corporation's motion to dismiss all of NETg's claims against SkillSoft
Corporation and its executive officers and key employees and granted Warburg,
Pincus Ventures, L.P.'s motion to dismiss claims related to its alleged tortious
interference with NETg's prospective economic advantage and unfair competition.
The case is currently in discovery and a trial has been scheduled for February
2004.
In addition, on July 26, 2000, NETg filed suit against SkillSoft Corporation in
the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois alleging
that SkillSoft Corporation's educational and training software products infringe
United States Patent No. 6,039,575, which was issued on March 21, 2000 and is
allegedly owned by NETg. The complaint seeks both monetary damages and
injunctive relief. SkillSoft Corporation filed its answer and a counterclaim for
a declaration of invalidity of the NETg patent on August 17, 2000. NETg filed
its reply and affirmative defenses to SkillSoft Corporation's counterclaim on
February 2, 2001.
On April 17, 2001, SkillSoft Corporation filed a request for reexamination of
the patent in suit with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the
"PTO"). On May 11, 2001, the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois entered an order staying the proceedings in NETg's patent
infringement action, with certain exceptions, pending resolution of SkillSoft
Corporation's request to the PTO to reexamine the patentability of the claims of
the patent on which NETg bases the lawsuit and any resulting reexamination
proceedings. After a series of interim actions by the PTO and filings by the
patent owner, on April 10, 2002 the PTO issued an Office Action rejecting all of
the claims of the patent. On September 6, 2002, an order was issued dismissing
the Federal Court litigation "without prejudice with leave to reinstate upon
full and final resolution of the reexamination proceedings." NETg's appeal of
the PTO's Office Action rejecting all of the claims of the patent remains
pending and, on or about September 10, 2002, the patent owner filed with the PTO
its brief in support of its appeal.
SkillSoft Corporation and the other defendants are vigorously defending
themselves against NETg's allegations, and we believe that both SkillSoft
Corporation and the other defendants have meritorious defenses to the claims
made in the lawsuits. While there have been certain settlement discussions
between the parties in the lawsuits, no settlement has yet been reached and we
intend to continue to vigorously contest NETg's claims. The current progress and
state of the proceedings do not permit an evaluation of the likelihood of an
unfavorable outcome or a fair estimate of the amount or range of potential loss,
if any. None of the defendants in the first lawsuit were bound by written
non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with NETg. We are not yet able to
assess our potential liability or the potential liability of the other
defendants. Nonetheless,
-31-
SkillSoft Corporation's failure to prevail in this litigation could have any or
all of the following significant adverse effects on our business and financial
performance:
- injunctive relief issued against SkillSoft Corporation and its
officers and employees, which could significantly restrict our
ability to conduct our business;
- an adverse judgment against SkillSoft Corporation for monetary
damages;
- a settlement on unfavorable terms;
- obligations SkillSoft Corporation has to indemnify its employees
for liabilities and expenses they incur in connection with the
lawsuits;
- obligations to customers for breach of SkillSoft Corporation's
warranty of noninfringement; or
- a requirement to reengineer SkillSoft Corporation's products to
avoid patent infringement, which would likely result in additional
expense and delay.
In addition, this litigation, regardless of its outcome, will continue to result
in significant expenses in defending the lawsuit and may divert the efforts and
attention of our management team from normal business operations.
IP LEARN
On April 23, 2002, IP Learn, LLC ("IP Learn") filed a complaint in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California against us. The
complaint alleges that we infringed on five United States patents assigned to IP
Learn. The complaint was subsequently amended to add an additional patent. The
IP Learn patents in question are U.S. Patent Nos. 6,126,448; 6,118,973;
5,934,909; 5,779,486, 5,743,746; and 6,398,556. We believe that these patents
are related primarily to computer-aided learning methods and systems. In the
complaint, IP Learn asked the court for a preliminary and permanent injunction
as well as unspecified damages. On June 27, 2002, we filed our answer to IP
Learn's amended complaint, denying infringement and asserting counterclaims
seeking declaratory relief that the patents-in-suit are invalid and that we have
not infringed the patents-in-suit.
On July 1, 2002, IP Learn served our subsidiary SkillSoft Corporation with an
amended complaint alleging that SkillSoft Corporation infringed U.S. Patent Nos.
6,126,448; 6,118,973; 5,934,909; 5,779,486 and 6,398,556. The complaint seeks
both monetary damages and injunctive relief. In response to the amended
complaint, SkillSoft Corporation filed a motion to dismiss or, in the
alternative, for a more definite statement. The United States District Court for
the Northern District of California granted SkillSoft Corporation's motion to
dismiss on October 15, 2002, and on October 25, 2002, IP Learn filed its Second
Amended Complaint alleging again that SkillSoft Corporation is infringing the
five IP United States patents assigned to IP Learn listed above. The Second
Amended Complaint seeks both monetary damages in an unspecified amount and
injunctive relief. On November 8, 2002, SkillSoft Corporation filed its Answer
to the Second Amended Complaint, in which it denied liability and asserted
counterclaims seeking declaratory relief that the specified patents are invalid
and that SkillSoft Corporation has not infringed the specified patents.
In June 2003, we reached an agreement with IP Learn regarding the settlement of
the pending litigation pursuant to which we obtained a license to use certain of
IP Learn's patents. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, we are required
to make a cash payment and to issue ordinary shares (which will be represented
by ADSs). The lawsuits will be dismissed following completion of the settlement.
LIONET
On June 13, 2002, Lionet Limited, a limited liability company incorporated and
doing business in Ireland, filed a claim against us in Ireland, alleging, among
other things, that we breached the terms of our software license agreement with
Lionet Limited in that we permitted or failed to prevent the decompilation of
the provided software products and that we have failed to cooperate in audits to
determine the nature of such alleged copying or de-compilation. Lionet Limited
is seeking damages for lost license fees of $6.8 million and seeks other
damages. We intend to vigorously defend ourselves in this matter.
We are not a party to any other material legal proceedings.
ITEM 2. - CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. - DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. - SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not Applicable
ITEM 5. - OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. - EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits.
-32-
See the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
(b) Reports.
On May 23, 2003, we furnished a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 9
containing a copy of our earnings release for the fiscal year ended January 31,
2003 pursuant to Item 12 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition).
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SKILLSOFT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY
Date: June 16, 2003 By /s/ Thomas J. McDonald
-----------------------------
Thomas J. McDonald
Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Charles E. Moran, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public
Limited Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date
within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
/s/ Charles E. Moran
------------------------------------
Dated: June 16, 2003 Charles E. Moran
President and Chief Executive Officer
-33-
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Thomas J. McDonald, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SkillSoft Public
Limited Company;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to
ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this
quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
disclosure controls and procedures as of a date
within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or
operation of internal controls which could adversely
affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have
identified for the registrant's auditors any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant
role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
/s/ Thomas J. McDonald
------------------------------------
Dated: June 16, 2003 Thomas J. McDonald
Chief Financial Officer
-34-
EXHIBIT INDEX
99.1 Certifications of the Company's CEO and CFO pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
-35-