Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
For Annual and Transition Reports Pursuant to
Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For The Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
OR |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
For the Transition Period
from to |
Commission File Number 001-12755
Dean Foods Company
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
75-2559681 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
2515 McKinney Avenue
Suite 1200
Dallas, Texas 75201
(214) 303-3400
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,
including
area code, of Registrants principal executive
offices)
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K o
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
The aggregate market value of the Registrants voting and
non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant
at June 30, 2004, based on the $37.31 per share
closing price for the Registrants common stock on the New
York Stock Exchange on June 30, 2004, was approximately
$5.76 billion.
The number of shares of the registrants common stock
outstanding as of March 11, 2005 was 150,155,790.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrants definitive Proxy Statement for
its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on or about
May 24, 2005 (to be filed) are incorporated by reference
into Part III of this Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
We are a leading food and beverage company. Our Dairy Group is
the largest processor and distributor of milk and various other
dairy products in the United States. The Dairy Group
manufactures and sells its products under a variety of local and
regional brand names and under private labels. Our WhiteWave
Foods Company manufactures, markets and sells a variety of well
known soy, dairy and dairy-related nationally branded products
including: Silk® soymilk and cultured soy products;
Horizon Organic® dairy products, juices and other
products; International Delight® coffee creamers;
Maries® refrigerated dips and dressings; and
LAND O LAKES® fluid dairy and cultured
products. Our Specialty Foods Group is the leading private label
pickle processor in the United States and a maker of a variety
of other food products. In January 2005, we announced our
intention to pursue a tax-free spin-off of our Specialty Foods
Group segment to our shareholders. See
Developments Since January 1,
2004 Tax Free Spin-Off of Specialty Foods
Group. We also own the fourth largest dairy processor in
Spain.
Our principal executive offices are located at 2515 McKinney
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201. Our telephone
number is (214) 303-3400. We maintain a worldwide web site
at www.deanfoods.com. We were incorporated in Delaware in
1994.
Segments and Operating Divisions
We currently have three reportable segments: the Dairy Group,
WhiteWave Foods Company (formerly the Branded Products Group)
and the Specialty Foods Group. Our reportable segments and other
operating divisions are described below.
Our Dairy Group manufactures, markets and distributes a wide
variety of branded and private label dairy case products to
retailers, distributors, foodservice outlets, schools and
governmental entities across the United States. The Dairy Group
also manufactures a portion of WhiteWave Foods Companys
products. See WhiteWave Foods Company.
The Dairy Groups sales totaled approximately
$8.65 billion in 2004, or approximately 80% of our
consolidated sales. The following charts graphically depict the
Dairy Groups 2004 sales by product and by channel, and
indicate the percentage of private label versus company branded
sales in 2004.
|
|
(1) |
Includes, among other things, regular milk, flavored milks,
buttermilk, half-and-half, whipping cream, dairy coffee creamers
and ice cream mix. |
|
(2) |
Includes ice cream and ice cream novelties. |
|
(3) |
Includes yogurt, cottage cheese, sour cream and dairy-based dips. |
|
(4) |
Includes fruit juice, fruit-flavored drinks and water. |
|
(5) |
Includes, among other things, items for resale such as butter,
cheese and eggs. |
1
|
|
(6) |
The Dairy Groups largest customer is Wal-Mart (including
its subsidiaries, such as Sams Club), which accounted for
14.6% of the Dairy Groups 2004 sales. |
|
(7) |
Such as restaurants, hotels and other foodservice outlets. |
Products not sold under private labels are sold under the Dairy
Groups local and regional proprietary or licensed brands.
Our local and regional proprietary and licensed brands include
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Northeast Region(1) |
|
Southeast Region(1) |
|
Midwest Region(1) |
|
Southwest Region(1) |
|
Morningstar Region(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chug®
Deans®
Garelick Farms®
Lehigh Valley®
Meadowbrook®
Natures
Pridetm
Sealtest® (licensed brand)
Shenandoahs Pride®
Swiss Premium®
Tuscan® |
|
Barbers®
Broughton®
Chug®
Country Delite®
Dairy Fresh®
Deans®
Frostbite®
Louis Trauth®
Mayfield®
McArthur®
Pet® (licensed brand)
Puritytm
Reiter®
TG Lee® |
|
Borden® (licensed brand)
Chug®
Country Charm®
Country Fresh®
Deans®
LAND OLAKES® (licensed brand)
Melody Farms®
Pet® (licensed brand)
Saunderstm
Schenkels All*Star®
Strohstm
Verifine® |
|
Adohr Farms®
Alta Dena®
Barbes®
Berkeley
Farmstm
Borden® (licensed brand)
Brownstm
Chug®
Country Charm®
Creamlandtm
Dairy
Goldtm
Deans®
Foremosttm
(licensed brand)
Gandys®
Hygeia®
Meadow Gold®
Model®
Mountain High®
Oak Farms®
Poudre Valley®
Pricestm
Robinson®
Schepps®
Swisstm
Viva® |
|
Affair®
Dairy Fresh®
Kohler Mix Specialties
LAND OLAKES® (licensed brand)
Quip®
Rods®
Shenandoahs Pride® |
|
|
(1) |
Our Dairy Group operates in a generally decentralized manner
organized by region. |
The Dairy Group sells its products primarily on a local or
regional basis through its local and regional sales forces,
although some national customer relationships are coordinated by
the Dairy Groups corporate sales department. Most of the
Dairy Groups customers, including its largest customer,
purchase products from the Dairy Group either by purchase order
or pursuant to contracts that are generally terminable at will
by the customer. The Dairy Groups sales are slightly
seasonal, with sales tending to be higher in the third and
fourth quarters.
Our Dairy Group currently operates 105 manufacturing facilities
in 35 states. For more information about facilities in the
Dairy Group, see Item 2. Properties.
Due to the perishable nature of the Dairy Groups products,
our Dairy Group delivers the majority of its products from its
facilities directly to its customers stores in
refrigerated trucks or trailers that we own or lease. This form
of delivery is called a direct store delivery or
DSD system. We believe our Dairy Group has one of
the most extensive refrigerated DSD systems in the United States.
The primary raw material used in our Dairy Group is raw milk. We
purchase our raw milk primarily from farmers cooperatives,
typically pursuant to requirements contracts (with no minimum
purchase obligation). Raw milk is generally readily available.
The minimum price of raw milk is regulated in most parts of the
country by the federal government. Several states also regulate
raw milk pricing through their own programs. For more
information about raw milk pricing in the United States, see
Government Regulation Milk
Industry Regulation and Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition
2
and Results of Operations Known Trends and
Uncertainties Prices of Raw Milk, Cream and Other
Inputs. Other raw materials used by the Dairy Group, such
as juice concentrates and sweeteners, in addition to packaging
supplies, are generally available from numerous suppliers and we
are not dependent on any single supplier for these materials.
Certain of our Dairy Groups raw materials and packaging
supplies are purchased under long-term contracts in order to
obtain lower costs. The prices of our raw materials increase and
decrease based on supply and demand.
The Dairy Group generally increases or decreases the prices of
its fluid dairy products on a monthly basis in correlation to
fluctuations in the costs of raw materials and packaging
supplies. However, in some cases, we are competitively or
contractually constrained with respect to the means and/or
timing of price increases, especially in the event of rapidly
increasing raw milk prices. This can have a negative impact on
the Dairy Groups profitability.
The dairy industry is a mature industry that has traditionally
been characterized by slow to flat growth, low profit margins,
fragmentation and excess capacity. Excess capacity resulted from
the development of more efficient manufacturing techniques, the
establishment of captive dairy manufacturing operations by some
grocery retailers and declining demand for fluid milk products.
Since 1990, the dairy industry has experienced significant
consolidation led in part by us. Consolidation has tended to
lower costs and raise efficiency. However, per capita
consumption of traditional fluid dairy products has continued to
decline. According to the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA), per capita consumption of fluid
milk and cream decreased by over 10% from 1990 to the end of
2003, although total consumption has remained relatively flat
over the same period due to population increases. Therefore,
volume growth across the industry generally remains flat to
modest, profit margins generally remain low and excess
manufacturing capacity continues to exist. In this environment,
price competition is particularly intense, as smaller processors
struggle to retain enough volume to cover their fixed costs. In
response to this dynamic, and due to the significant competitive
pressure caused by the ongoing consolidation among food
retailers, many processors, including us, are now placing an
increased emphasis on product differentiation and cost reduction
in an effort to increase consumption, sales and margins.
Our Dairy Group has several competitors in each of our major
product and geographic markets. Competition between dairy
processors for shelf-space with retailers is based primarily on
price, service and quality, while competition for consumer sales
is based on a variety of factors such as brand recognition,
price, taste preference and quality. Dairy products also compete
with many other beverages and nutritional products for consumer
sales.
For more financial information about our Dairy Groups
recent operations, see Part II
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and
Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
WhiteWave Foods Companys operations have historically been
conducted through three distinct operating units: White Wave,
Inc. (White Wave), Horizon Organic and Dean National
Brand Group. We are currently in the process of consolidating
these three operating units and expect the consolidation to be
completed in 2006.
WhiteWave Foods Company develops, manufactures, markets and
sells a variety of nationally branded soy, dairy and
dairy-related products, such as Silk soymilk and cultured
soy products; Horizon Organic dairy products, juices and
other products; International Delight coffee creamers;
and LAND OLAKES creamers and cultured products.
WhiteWave Foods Company also sells Sun Soy® soymilk;
The Organic Cow of Vermont® organic dairy products;
White Wave® and Tofu Town® branded tofu;
Hersheys® milks and milkshakes;
Maries dips and dressings; and Naturally
Yours® sour cream. We license the LAND OLAKES
and Hersheys names from third parties.
Other branded products sold by WhiteWave Foods Company include
Mocha Mix® non-dairy liquid coffee creamer and
Second Nature® egg substitute. In connection with
our planned spin-off of our Specialty
3
Foods Group segment in the third quarter of 2005, we intend to
transfer the Mocha Mix and Second Nature
businesses to our Specialty Foods Group segment, effective
as of the time of the spin-off. Finally, a small portion
(approximately 3% in 2004) of WhiteWave Foods Companys
sales is private label soymilk and organic dairy products.
WhiteWave Foods Companys sales totaled approximately
$1.19 billion in 2004, or approximately 11% of our
consolidated sales.
WhiteWave Foods Company sells its products to a variety of
customers, including grocery stores, club stores, natural foods
stores, mass merchandisers, convenience stores and foodservice
outlets. In 2004, approximately 84% of WhiteWave Foods
Companys sales were to retailers and approximately 8% were
to foodservice outlets. WhiteWave Foods Companys customer
base is diverse, with no single customer representing more than
10% of sales in 2004. WhiteWave Foods Company sells its products
through its internal sales force and through independent
brokers. The majority of WhiteWave Foods Companys products
are sold pursuant to customer purchase order or pursuant to
contracts that are generally terminable at will by the customer.
In 2004, approximately 64% of the products sold by WhiteWave
Foods Company were manufactured by our Dairy Group. An
additional 32% were manufactured by third-party manufacturers
under processing agreements. WhiteWave Foods Company currently
owns two manufacturing facilities, one of which produces all of
its tofu products and the other, purchased in April 2004,
produces a portion of its Silk soymilk.
The majority of WhiteWave Foods Companys products are
delivered by common carrier to customer warehouses, although
some products are distributed through third-party distributors
or through our Dairy Groups DSD system.
The primary raw materials used in our soy-based products are
organic soybeans and organic soybean concentrate. Organic
soybeans are generally available from several suppliers and we
are not dependent on any single supplier for these products. We
have entered into supply agreements for organic soybeans, which
we believe will meet our needs in 2005. Generally, these
agreements provide pricing at fixed levels. The primary raw
material used in our organic milk-based products is organic raw
milk. Organic raw milk supplies are constrained and the growth
of our organic dairy business depends on us being able to
procure sufficient quantities of organic raw milk in time to
meet our needs. We currently purchase organic raw milk from a
network of approximately 300 dairy farmers across the United
States. We generally enter into supply agreements with dairy
farmers, with typical terms of one to two years, which obligate
us to purchase certain minimum quantities. We also produce
certain of our own organic raw milk needs in the U.S. at
two organic farms that we own and operate. We believe, based on
currently projected sales levels, that we have secured a
sufficient supply of raw organic milk to meet our needs for the
remainder of 2005. The primary raw material used in our LAND
OLAKES and other non-organic dairy products is raw
milk. We purchase raw milk from farmers cooperatives,
typically pursuant to requirements contracts (with no minimum
purchase obligation). Raw milk is generally readily available.
The minimum price of raw milk is regulated in most parts of the
country by the federal government. Several states also regulate
raw milk pricing through their own programs. Other raw materials
used in WhiteWave Foods Companys products, such as
flavorings, organic sugar and packaging materials, are generally
available from several suppliers and we are not dependent on any
single supplier for these materials. Certain of these raw
materials are purchased under contracts in order to obtain lower
costs. The prices of raw materials increase and decrease based
on supply and demand. For more information, see
Part II Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Known Trends and
Uncertainties Prices of Raw Milk, Cream and Other
Inputs.
WhiteWave Foods Company has several competitors in each of its
product markets. Competition to obtain shelf-space with
retailers for a particular product is based primarily on the
expected or historical sales performance of the product compared
to its competitors. Also, in some cases, WhiteWave Foods Company
pays fees to retailers to obtain shelf-space for a particular
product. Competition for consumer sales is based on many
different factors, including brand recognition, price, taste
preferences and quality. Consumer demand for soy and organic
foods has grown rapidly in recent years due to growing consumer
confidence in the health benefits of soy and organic foods, and
WhiteWave Foods Company has a leading position in the soy and
4
organic foods category. However, our soy and organic food
products compete with many other beverages and nutritional
products for consumer sales.
For more information about our WhiteWave Foods Company, see
Part II Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Note 20 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Our Specialty Foods Group is the nations leading private
label pickle processor, and the largest manufacturer and seller
of private label non-dairy powdered creamer in the United
States. The Specialty Foods Group also manufactures and sells a
variety of other foods, such as aseptic sauces and puddings. In
January 2005, we announced our intention to pursue a tax-free
spin-off of our Specialty Foods Group to our shareholders. See
Developments Since January 1,
2004 Tax Free Spin-Off of Specialty Foods
Group.
The Specialty Foods Groups sales totaled
$676.8 million in 2004, or approximately 6% of our
consolidated sales. The following charts graphically depict the
Specialty Foods Groups 2004 sales by product category and
channel, and indicate the percentage of private label sales
versus company branded sales in 2004.
|
|
(1) |
Approximately 75% of the Specialty Foods Groups pickle,
relish and pepper products are sold under private labels, with
the remaining 25% sold under our proprietary brands including
Farmans®, Nalleys®, Peter
Piper® and Steinfeld. Branded pickle
products are sold to retailers. Private label products are sold
to retailers, foodservice customers and in bulk to other food
processors. |
|
(2) |
Non-dairy powdered creamer is used as a coffee creamer and as an
ingredient in baking, beverage mixes, gravies and sauces. In
2004, Specialty Foods Group sold 14% of its non-dairy powdered
creamer under our Cremora® brand, while the rest of
the Specialty Foods Groups creamer products were sold
under private labels to retailers, distributors and in bulk to
other food companies for use as ingredients in their products. |
|
(3) |
Aseptic products are sterilized, which allows storage for
prolonged periods without refrigeration. Our Specialty Foods
Group manufactures aseptic cheese sauces and puddings. Our
cheese sauces and puddings are sold primarily under private
labels to distributors. In 2004, our Specialty Foods Group also
sold aseptic nutritional beverages in the meal supplement,
weight loss/gain and sports categories, all of which were sold
under customer brands to retailers and distributors. In the
fourth quarter of 2004, we exited the nutritional beverage
business due largely to significant declines in volume. |
|
(4) |
Includes shrimp, seafood, tartar, horseradish, chili, sweet and
sour sauces and syrups sold to retail grocers in the eastern,
midwestern and southern United States. These products are sold
under the Bennetts®, Hoffman
House® and
Roddenberry®Northwoods® brand names. |
5
|
|
(5) |
Includes mass merchandisers, club stores, convenience stores and
grocery stores. The Specialty Foods Groups largest
customer is Wal-Mart (including its subsidiaries, such as
Sams Club) which accounted for 10.1% of the Specialty
Foods Groups 2004 sales. |
The Specialty Foods Groups products are delivered to
customers stores and warehouses primarily by common
carrier. The Specialty Foods Group sells its products through
its internal sales force and through independent brokers. Most
of the Specialty Foods Groups customers purchase products
from the Specialty Foods Group either by purchase order or
pursuant to contracts that are generally terminable at will by
the customer.
Our Specialty Foods Group uses a wide variety of raw materials.
The main raw material used by the Specialty Foods Group is
cucumbers. The Specialty Foods Group purchases cucumbers under
seasonal grower contracts with a variety of growers. We supply
seeds and advise growers regarding planting techniques. We also
monitor and arrange proper agricultural practices. Other raw
materials used by the Specialty Foods Group, such as corn syrup,
soy bean oil and casein, in addition to packaging materials, are
generally available from numerous suppliers and we are not
dependent on any single supplier for these materials. Certain of
the Specialty Foods Groups raw materials and packaging
supplies are purchased under long-term contracts in order to
obtain lower costs. The prices of the Specialty Foods
Groups raw materials increase or decrease based on supply
and demand.
The Specialty Foods Group produces its products in 10 facilities
located across the United States. For more information about the
Specialty Foods Groups manufacturing facilities, see
Item 2. Properties.
The Specialty Foods Group has several competitors in each of its
product markets. In sales of private label products, the
principal competitive factors are price relative to other
private label suppliers, product quality and quality of service.
For the Specialty Foods Groups branded products,
competition to obtain shelf-space with retailers is based on the
expected or historical sales performance of the product compared
to its competitors. In certain cases, the Specialty Foods Group
pays fees to retailers to obtain shelf-space for a particular
company-branded product. Competition for consumer sales is based
on brand recognition, price, taste preferences and quality.
Our International Group manufactures, markets and sells private
label and branded milk, butter and cream through its internal
sales force to retailers and distributors across Spain and
Portugal. The International Groups sales totaled
$310.7 million in 2004, or approximately 3% of our
consolidated sales.
The following charts graphically depict the International
Groups 2004 sales by product category and channel, and
indicate the percentage of private label sales versus company
branded sales in 2004.
|
|
(1) |
All of our International Groups fluid dairy products are
pasteurized at ultra-high temperatures (UHT). |
6
|
|
(2) |
Our International Groups largest customers in 2004 were
Carrefour, S.A., Lidl Supermercados S.A., and Eroski Sociedad
Cooperativa, which accounted for approximately 25.2%, 11.2% and
10.8% of the International Groups 2004 sales, respectively. |
|
(3) |
Including our proprietary Celta®, Campobueno®,
Milsani® and La Vaquera® brands. |
Our International Group manufactures its products in five
facilities in Spain and Portugal. For more information about our
International Group facilities, see Item 2.
Properties. In the fourth quarter of 2004 we completed
construction of a new facility, located in Alpiarca, Portugal,
which commenced production in December 2004. Our
International Group operates its business primarily from its
headquarters located in Pontedeume, Galicia, Spain.
The long shelf life of our International Groups UHT fluid
milk products allows delivery by common carrier. Most of the
International Groups customers purchase our products
either by purchase order or by contracts that are generally
terminable at will by the customer. Our International
Groups sales are slightly seasonal, with sales tending to
be lower in the third quarter.
The primary raw material used by our International Group is raw
milk. We purchase our raw milk from farmers cooperatives
and other intermediaries pursuant to formal and informal
contractual arrangements. Raw milk production volume is
regulated by European Union quotas, which sometimes limit the
availability of raw milk to processors. The price of raw milk is
defined solely by supply and demand and can fluctuate widely.
Our International Group purchases its packaging materials from
two leading suppliers. Packaging materials represent a
significant portion of our International Groups raw
material costs and are purchased under long-term contracts in
order to obtain lower costs.
The Iberian fluid dairy market, which includes Spain and
Portugal, is characterized by relatively high per capita
consumption and the UHT brick pack format dominates
the industry. The combination of these factors makes the Iberian
region one of the largest UHT markets in the world. The Iberian
fluid dairy market has been characterized over the past
20 years by slow growth in the core products and faster
growth for value-added products such as nutritionally enriched
milks. The Iberian fluid dairy industry is highly competitive,
with leading companies investing heavily in innovation and
branding. The industry has undergone significant consolidation
in the past 5 to 10 years leading to the emergence of
several national brands, including our Celta brand. Our
International Group competes with all the leading fluid dairy
processors operating in the Iberian region. Competition between
dairy processors for private label business has intensified
recently as a result of retailer consolidation, and is based
primarily on price, service and quality. Competition for branded
sales to consumers is based on a number of factors, including
brand recognition, price and quality.
Effective January 1, 2005, our Rachels Organic Dairy
business, which has historically been a part of Horizon
Organics operations, was transferred to the International
Group. Rachels Organic Dairy, which markets and sells
organic dairy products across the United Kingdom, has one
facility located in Aberystwth, Wales. The preceding discussion
excludes Rachels Organic Dairy.
Current Business Strategy
|
|
|
Maximize Dairy Group Performance |
As the largest dairy processor in the United States, our Dairy
Group is in a unique position to provide unmatched service,
convenience and value to our customers. We are intently focused
on maintaining and extending our Dairy Groups leadership
position by focusing on our customers needs.
In 2004, our Dairy Group was successful in maintaining its sales
volume despite extremely volatile raw milk prices and declining
overall demand for dairy products in the United States, which we
believe indicates that we are gaining market share. However,
Dairy Group profitability suffered in 2004 due to an extremely
competitive retail environment and a difficult raw material
environment, as well as unusually high fuel and energy costs. We
closed eight Dairy Group facilities in 2004 in an effort to
reduce our cost structure. In 2005, we are focused on
maintaining and growing our Dairy Groups sales volume by
continuing to provide our customers with the highest level of
service, quality and value, while at the same time further
reducing our cost
7
structure through rationalization of manufacturing and
distribution networks and more efficient utilization of
technology and other efficiency initiatives.
|
|
|
Consolidate and Reorganize WhiteWave Foods Company |
In the third quarter of 2004, we announced our intention to
consolidate the three businesses included within our WhiteWave
Foods Company segment (formerly the Branded Products Group
segment) into a single operating unit. We believe this
consolidation will allow us to interact with customers more
efficiently and effectively as a single sales and marketing
organization, and will enable us to create a simplified and more
efficient supply chain for our branded business. We have
completed the consolidation of the sales, marketing and research
and development organization for the three companies, and in the
third quarter of 2005, the employees of the new company will
move to a new headquarters located in Broomfield, Colorado. The
full integration of these businesses will be a lengthy process
involving all aspects of the three companies operations,
including purchasing, manufacturing, distribution and
administration, and will include the selection and
implementation of a new information technology platform. As part
of our overall reorganization of WhiteWave Foods Company into a
unified branded consumer packaged goods company, we also intend
to bring in-house certain manufacturing activities that are
currently being done by third parties. We expect the
consolidation to be completed within the next 12 to 18 months.
One of our primary strategic objectives in 2005 is the
successful continuation of the consolidation and reorganization
process.
In addition, effective March 11, 2005, Mr. Steve
Demos, President of WhiteWave Foods Company resigned his
position. We have retained a leading executive recruiting firm
to assist in the search for a new president. Mr. Gregg
Engles, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
has assumed direct leadership of WhiteWave Foods Company on an
interim basis.
|
|
|
Invest in the Growth and Profitability of our
Brands |
In 2005, we intend to continue to invest in aggressively
marketing our WhiteWave Foods Company brands, with an emphasis
on our largest and most successful brands: Silk, Horizon
Organic, International Delight and LAND OLAKES.
Further, we will continue to make capital expenditures allowing
us to increase internal manufacturing, which we believe will
allow us to better manage our working capital and increase
profitability.
Developments Since January 1, 2004
|
|
|
Reorganization of WhiteWave Foods Company |
In the third quarter of 2004, we announced our intent to
consolidate the three businesses included within WhiteWave Foods
Company. See Current Business Strategy
above.
|
|
|
Tax-Free Spin-Off of Specialty Foods Group |
On January 27, 2005, we announced our intent to pursue a
tax-free spin-off of our Specialty Foods Group. The spin-off
will create a publicly traded food manufacturing company serving
the retail grocery and foodservice markets with approximately
1,800 employees and estimated 2005 net sales of over
$700 million. Also effective January 27, 2005, we
hired a new management team, headed by Sam Reed, former CEO of
Keebler Foods Company, to lead the new company. In conjunction
with their employment, the management team made a cash
investment of $10 million in the Specialty Foods Group,
representing 1.7% ownership of the new business.
As part of the spin-off, we intend to transfer our Mocha
Mix® non-dairy creamer, Second Nature® egg
substitute and foodservice salad dressings businesses to the
Specialty Foods Group from WhiteWave Foods Company and our Dairy
Group.
The spin-off is intended to take the form of a tax-free
distribution to our shareholders of a new publicly traded stock,
which we expect to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange. We
expect the spin-off to be completed in the third quarter of
2005, subject to confirmation by the Internal Revenue Service of
the tax-free nature of the transaction, registration of the new
security with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other
customary closing conditions.
8
On October 15, 2004 our Dairy Group acquired Milk Products
of Alabama, a dairy manufacturer based in Decatur, Alabama. Milk
Products of Alabama had net sales of approximately
$34 million in 2003. As a result of this acquisition, we
have expanded our production capabilities in the southeastern
United States, allowing us to better serve our customers. Milk
Products of Alabamas results of operations are now
included in the Morningstar division of our Dairy Group. We paid
approximately $23.2 million for the purchase of Milk
Products of Alabama, including costs of acquisition, and funded
the purchase price with borrowings under our senior credit
facility.
On May 31, 2004, Leche Celta, our Spanish subsidiary,
acquired Tiger Foods, a dairy processing business with one
facility located in Avila, Spain. Tiger Foods, which had net
sales of approximately $29 million in 2003, manufactures
and distributes branded and private label UHT milk and
dairy-based drinks throughout Spain, with an emphasis in the
southern and central regions. Tiger Foods operations
complement our Spanish operations and we expect this acquisition
to allow us to reduce our transportation costs for raw milk and
finished products due to the new facilitys geographic
proximity to our raw milk suppliers and certain customers. We
paid approximately $21.9 million for the purchase of the
company, all of which was funded with borrowings under our
senior credit facility.
On April 5, 2004, WhiteWave Foods Company acquired a soy
processing and packaging facility located in Bridgeton, New
Jersey. Prior to the acquisition, the previous owner of the
facility co-packed Silk products for us at the facility.
As a result of the acquisition, we have increased our in-house
processing and packaging capabilities for our soy products,
resulting in cost reductions. We paid approximately
$25.7 million for the purchase of the facility, all of
which was funded using borrowings under our senior credit
facility.
In 2002, we purchased a perpetual license to use the LAND
OLAKES brand on certain dairy products nationally,
excluding cheese and butter. This perpetual license was subject,
however, to a pre-existing sublicense entitling a competitor to
manufacture and sell cream, sour cream and whipping cream in
certain channels in the eastern United States. Effective
March 31, 2004, we acquired that sublicense and certain
customer relationships of the sublicensee (LAND
OLAKES East) for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $17 million, all of which was funded using
borrowings under our senior credit facility. We now have the
exclusive right to use the LAND OLAKES brand on
certain dairy products (other than cheese and butter) throughout
the entire United States.
On January 26, 2004, our Dairy Group acquired Ross Swiss
Dairies, a dairy distributor based in Los Angeles, California,
which had net sales of approximately $120 million in 2003.
As a result of this acquisition, we have increased the
distribution capability of our Dairy Group in southern
California, allowing us to better serve our customers. Ross
Swiss Dairies historically purchased a significant portion of
its products from other processors. Now the majority of products
distributed by Ross Swiss Dairies are manufactured in our
southern California facilities. We paid approximately
$21.8 million, including transaction costs, for the
purchase of Ross Swiss Dairies and funded the purchase price
with borrowings under our receivables-backed facility.
On January 2, 2004, we completed the acquisition of the 87%
of Horizon Organic Holding Corporation (Horizon
Organic) that we did not already own. Horizon Organic had
sales of over $200 million during
9
2003. We already owned approximately 13% of the outstanding
common stock of Horizon Organic as a result of investments made
in 1998. Third-party co-packers, including us, have historically
done all of Horizon Organics manufacturing. During 2003,
we produced approximately 27% of Horizon Organics fluid
dairy products. We also distributed Horizon Organics
products in several parts of the country. Horizon Organic is a
leading branded organic foods company in the United States.
Because organic foods are gaining popularity with consumers and
because Horizon Organics products offer consumers an
alternative to our Dairy Groups traditional dairy
products, we believe Horizon Organic is an important addition to
our portfolio of brands. The aggregate purchase price for the
87% of Horizon Organic that we did not already own was
approximately $287 million, including approximately
$217 million of cash paid to Horizon Organics
stockholders, the repayment of approximately $40 million of
borrowings under Horizon Organics former credit facility,
and transaction expenses of approximately $9 million, all
of which was funded using borrowings under our senior credit
facility and our receivables-backed facility. In addition, each
of the options to purchase Horizon Organics common stock
outstanding on January 2, 2004 was converted into an option
to purchase .7301 shares of our stock, with an aggregate
fair value of approximately $21 million. Beginning with the
first quarter of 2004, Horizon Organics financial results
are reported as part of our WhiteWave Foods Company segment.
See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information about our acquisitions.
|
|
|
Facility Closing and Reorganization Activities |
As part of our continued reorganization and cost reduction
efforts in our Dairy Group, we closed eight Dairy Group
facilities in 2004. The closed facilities were located in
Lansing, Michigan; Wilkesboro, North Carolina; Madison,
Wisconsin; Sulphur Springs, Texas; San Leandro and South
Gate, California; Westwego, Louisiana and Pocatello, Idaho.
On September 7, 2004, we announced our plan to exit the
nutritional beverages business operated by our Specialty Foods
Group segment, including the closure of a manufacturing facility
in Benton Harbor, Michigan. In 2004, we experienced significant
declines in volume on this product line and we believed those
volumes could not be replaced without a significant investment
in capital and research and development. We ceased nutritional
beverages production in December 2004.
We recorded a total of approximately $34.7 million in
facility closing and reorganization costs during 2004. We expect
to incur additional charges related to these restructuring plans
of approximately $7.1 million, primarily in 2005. These
charges include the following costs:
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions as a result of facility closings, facility
reorganizations and consolidation of administrative functions; |
|
|
|
Shutdown costs, including those costs necessary to prepare
abandoned facilities for closure; |
|
|
|
Costs incurred after shutdown such as lease obligations or
termination costs, utilities and property taxes; |
|
|
|
Costs associated with the reorganization of WhiteWave Foods
Companys supply chain and distribution activities,
including termination of certain contractual agreements; and |
|
|
|
Write-downs of property, plant and equipment and other assets,
primarily for asset impairments as a result of facilities that
are no longer used in operations. The impairments relate
primarily to owned buildings, land and equipment at the
facilities, which are written down to their estimated fair value
and held for sale. |
See Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information regarding our facility closing and
reorganization activities.
10
|
|
|
Construction of New Facilities |
During 2004, our Dairy Group completed construction of a new
dairy manufacturing and distribution facility in Las Vegas,
Nevada. This facility commenced operations in the third quarter
of 2004 and allows us to better serve the southern Nevada,
Arizona, and southern Colorado markets. In addition, Leche Celta
finished construction of our first dairy manufacturing facility
in Portugal in the fourth quarter of 2004. The new facility is
located in Alpiarca, Portugal and commenced production in
December 2004. The new facility allows us to expand our Iberian
operations.
During 2004, we spent approximately $297 million, including
commissions and fees, to repurchase 9.3 million shares
of our common stock for an average purchase price of
$31.90 per share. At March 11, 2005, approximately
$118 million remained available under our current
authorization. See Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements and Part II Item 5.
Market for Our Common Stock and Related Matters.
|
|
|
Amendment to Credit Facility |
In August 2004, we amended our senior credit facility to
(1) increase the size of our revolving credit facility from
$1 billion to $1.5 billion, (2) increase the size
of our term loan A from $850 million to
$1.5 billion, (3) eliminate term loans B and C and
(4) modify the interest rate and payment terms. When we
amended our credit facility, we were required to write-off
approximately $32.6 million of deferred financing costs
that were incurred in connection with our credit facility prior
to the amendment. These costs were being amortized over the
previous terms of the revolving credit facility and term loans.
See Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004 we had the following employees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of | |
|
% of | |
|
|
Employees | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Dairy Group
|
|
|
25,730 |
|
|
|
89.9 |
% |
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
International Group
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
28,610 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately 38% of the Dairy Groups employees and
approximately 54% of the Specialty Foods Groups employees
participate in collective bargaining agreements.
Government Regulation
As a manufacturer and distributor of food products, we are
subject to a number of food-related regulations, including the
Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and regulations promulgated
thereunder by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
(FDA). This comprehensive regulatory framework
governs the manufacture (including composition and ingredients),
labeling, packaging and safety of food in the United States. The
FDA:
|
|
|
|
|
regulates manufacturing practices for foods through its current
good manufacturing practices regulations, |
11
|
|
|
|
|
specifies the standards of identity for certain foods, including
many of the products we sell, and |
|
|
|
prescribes the format and content of certain information
required to appear on food product labels. |
In addition, the FDA enforces the Public Health Service Act and
regulations issued thereunder, which authorize regulatory
activity necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission or
spread of communicable diseases. These regulations require, for
example, pasteurization of milk and milk products. We are
subject to numerous other federal, state and local regulations
involving such matters as the licensing and registration of
manufacturing facilities, enforcement by government health
agencies of standards for our products, inspection of our
facilities and regulation of our trade practices in connection
with the sale of food products.
We use quality control laboratories in our manufacturing
facilities to test raw ingredients. Product quality and
freshness are essential to the successful distribution of our
products. To monitor product quality at our facilities, we
maintain quality control programs to test products during
various processing stages. We believe that our facilities and
manufacturing practices comply with all material government
regulations.
|
|
|
Employee Safety Regulations |
We are subject to certain safety regulations including
regulations issued pursuant to the U.S. Occupational Safety
and Health Act. These regulations require us to comply with
certain manufacturing safety standards to protect our employees
from accidents. We believe that we are in material compliance
with all employee safety regulations.
|
|
|
Environmental Regulations |
We are subject to various environmental regulations. Ammonia, a
refrigerant used extensively in our operations, is considered an
extremely hazardous substance pursuant to
U.S. federal environmental laws due to its toxicity. Also,
certain of our facilities discharge biodegradable wastewater
into municipal waste treatment facilities in excess of levels
permitted under local regulations. Because of this, certain of
our subsidiaries are required to pay wastewater surcharges or to
construct wastewater pretreatment facilities. To date, such
wastewater surcharges have not had a material effect on our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
We maintain above-ground or underground petroleum storage tanks
at many of our facilities. These tanks are periodically
inspected to determine compliance with applicable regulations.
We are required to make expenditures from time to time in order
to maintain compliance of these tanks. To date, such
expenditures have not had a material effect on our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
We do not expect environmental compliance to have a material
impact on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive
position in the foreseeable future.
The federal government establishes minimum prices that we must
pay to producers in federally regulated areas for raw milk. Raw
milk contains primarily raw skim milk, in addition to a small
percentage of butterfat. The federal government establishes
separate minimum prices for raw skim milk and butterfat. Raw
milk delivered to our facilities is tested to determine the
percentage of butterfat, and we pay our suppliers separate
prices for the raw skim milk and butterfat based on the results
of these tests.
The federal governments minimum prices are calculated by
economic formula based on supply and demand and vary depending
on the processors geographic location or sales area and
the type of product manufactured using the raw product. Federal
minimum prices change monthly. Class I butterfat and raw
skim milk prices (which are the minimum prices we are required
to pay for butterfat and raw skim milk that is processed into
milk) and Class II raw skim milk prices (which are the
prices we are required to pay for raw skim milk that is
processed into products such as cottage cheese, creams,
creamers, ice cream and sour cream) for each month are announced
by the federal government by the 23rd day of the
immediately preceding month. Class II butterfat prices for
each month are announced on or before the fifth day after the
end of that month.
12
Some states have established their own rules for determining
minimum prices for raw milk. In addition to the federal or state
minimum prices, we also pay producer premiums, procurement costs
and other related charges that vary by location and vendor. A
few states also have retail pricing requirements.
In Spain, the government has established a quota system
regulating the amount of milk that can be sold by individual
farmers and farm cooperatives, which affects the prices we pay
for raw milk.
Brief History
We commenced operations in 1988 through a predecessor entity.
Our original operations consisted solely of a packaged ice
business. Since then the following activity has occurred:
|
|
|
|
|
December 1993
|
|
|
|
Acquired Suiza Dairy Corporation, a regional dairy processor
located in Puerto Rico. We then began acquiring other local and
regional U.S. dairy processors, growing our dairy business
rapidly primarily through acquisitions. |
|
April 1996
|
|
|
|
Completed our initial public offering under our former name
Suiza Foods Corporation and began trading on Nasdaq
National Market. |
|
January 1997
|
|
|
|
Completed a secondary offering. |
|
March 1997
|
|
|
|
Began trading on the New York Stock Exchange. |
|
August 1997
|
|
|
|
Acquired Franklin Plastics, Inc., a company engaged in the
business of manufacturing and selling plastic containers. After
the acquisition, we began acquiring other companies in the
plastic packaging industry. |
|
November 1997
|
|
|
|
Acquired Morningstar Foods Inc., whose business was the
predecessor to our WhiteWave Foods Company. This was our first
acquisition of a company with national brands. |
|
April 1998
|
|
|
|
Sold our packaged ice operations. |
|
May 1998
|
|
|
|
Acquired Continental Can Company, making us one of the largest
plastic packaging companies in the United States. |
|
July 1999
|
|
|
|
Sold all of our U.S. plastic packaging operations to
Consolidated Container Company in exchange for cash and a
minority interest in the purchaser. |
|
January 2000
|
|
|
|
Acquired Southern Foods Group, L.P., the third largest dairy
processor in the United States, making us the largest dairy
processor in the country. |
|
February 2000
|
|
|
|
Acquired Leche Celta, one of the largest dairy processors in
Spain. |
|
March and May 2000
|
|
|
|
Sold our European packaging operations. |
|
December 2001
|
|
|
|
Acquired Dean Foods Company (Legacy Dean) and
changed our name from Suiza Foods Corporation to Dean Foods
Company. Legacy Dean changed its name to Dean Holding Company. |
|
May 2002
|
|
|
|
Acquired the portion of White Wave, Inc. that we did not already
own. |
|
January 2004
|
|
|
|
Acquired the portion of Horizon Organic that we did not already
own. |
|
August 2004
|
|
|
|
Announced the consolidation of our Branded Products Group
segment (now known as WhiteWave Foods Company). |
|
January 2005
|
|
|
|
Announced our intention to pursue a tax-free spin-off of our
Specialty Foods Group. |
13
Minority Holdings
We own an approximately 27% interest in Consolidated Container
Company (CCC), one of the nations largest
manufacturers of rigid plastic containers and our largest
supplier of plastic bottles and bottle components. We have owned
a minority interest in CCC since July 1999 when we sold our
U.S. plastic packaging operations to CCC. Vestar Capital
Partners controls CCC through a majority ownership interest.
Less than 1% of CCC is owned indirectly by Alan Bernon, a member
of our Board of Directors, and his brother Peter Bernon.
Pursuant to our agreements with Vestar, we control 2 of the
7 seats on CCCs Management Committee. We also have
entered into various supply agreements with CCC pursuant to
which we have agreed to purchase certain of our requirements for
plastic bottles and bottle components from CCC. In 2004, we
spent approximately $235.5 million on products purchased
from CCC and $3.2 million to purchase equipment previously
owned and operated by CCC. Because CCC has issued certain senior
notes, CCC files annual, quarterly and other reports with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. More information about CCC
can be found on its website at www.cccllc.com or in its
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission available at
www.sec.gov.
See Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information about our investment in CCC.
Where You Can Get More Information
Our fiscal year ends on December 31. We furnish our
stockholders with annual reports containing audited financial
statements. In addition, we file annual, quarterly and current
reports, proxy statements and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Legacy Dean, which is now
known as Dean Holding Company and is a wholly owned subsidiary
of ours, also files annual, quarterly and current reports with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
You may read and copy any reports, statements or other
information that we or Dean Holding Company file with the
Securities and Exchange Commission at the Securities and
Exchange Commissions Public Reference Room at
450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20549. You can
request copies of these documents, upon payment of a duplicating
fee, by writing to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Please call the Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the operation of the
Public Reference Room.
We file our reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission
electronically via the Securities and Exchange Commissions
Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis and Retrieval system
(EDGAR). The Securities and Exchange Commission
maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and
information statements, and other information regarding
companies that file electronically with the Securities and
Exchange Commission via EDGAR. The address of this Internet site
is http://www.sec.gov.
We also make available free of charge through our website at
www.deanfoods.com our annual report on Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on
Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably
practicable after we electronically file such material with, or
furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.
14
Our Code of Ethics, which is applicable to all of our employees
and directors, is available on our corporate website at
www.deanfoods.com, together with the Corporate Governance
Principles of our Board of Directors and the charters of all of
the Committees of our Board of Directors. Any waivers that we
may grant to our executive officers or directors under the Code
of Ethics, and any amendments to our Code of Ethics, will be
posted on our corporate website. If you would like hard copies
of any of these documents, or of any of our filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, write or call us at:
|
|
|
Dean Foods Company |
|
2515 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1200 |
|
Dallas, Texas 75201 |
|
(214) 303-3400 |
|
Attention: Investor Relations |
15
Dairy Group
Our Dairy Group currently conducts its manufacturing operations
from the following facilities, most of which are owned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
Region |
|
Facilities | |
|
Locations of Facilities |
|
|
| |
|
|
Northeast
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
Bangor, Maine |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lynn, Massachusetts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Franklin, Massachusetts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mendon, Massachusetts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Burlington, New Jersey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Union, New Jersey |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rensselaer, New York |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Akron, Ohio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belleville, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erie, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lansdale, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lebanon, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schuylkill Haven, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sharpsville, Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Springfield, Virginia |
Southeast
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
Birmingham, Alabama (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louisville, Kentucky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newport, Kentucky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange City, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orlando, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Miami, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baxley, Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Braselton, Georgia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hickory, North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Winston-Salem, North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marietta, Ohio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Toledo, Ohio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Florence, South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spartanburg, South Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Athens, Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kingsport, Tennessee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nashville, Tennessee (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portsmouth, Virginia |
Midwest
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
Belvidere, Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemung, Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huntley, Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFallon, Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rockford, Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huntington, Indiana |
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
Region |
|
Facilities | |
|
Locations of Facilities |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rochester, Indiana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Detroit, Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evart, Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flint, Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Livonia, Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thief River Falls, Minnesota |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodbury, Minnesota |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bismarck, North Dakota |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Springfield, Ohio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sioux Falls, South Dakota |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sheboygan, Wisconsin |
Southwest
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
Buena Park, California (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Industry, California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fullerton, California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hayward, California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Riverside, California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulare, California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delta, Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denver, Colorado (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Englewood, Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greeley, Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Honolulu, Hawaii |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hilo, Hawaii |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boise, Idaho |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Orleans, Louisiana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shreveport, Louisiana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billings, Montana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Great Falls, Montana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kalispell, Montana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lincoln, Nebraska |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Las Vegas, Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reno, Nevada |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dallas, Texas (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Paso, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lubbock, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
McKinney, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Antonio, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulphur Springs, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waco, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orem, Utah |
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
Region |
|
Facilities | |
|
Locations of Facilities |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salt Lake City, Utah |
Morningstar
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
Decatur, Alabama |
|
|
|
|
|
|
City of Industry, California (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gustine, California |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newington, Connecticut |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jacksonville, Florida |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thornton, Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Murray, Kentucky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Frederick, Maryland |
|
|
|
|
|
|
White Bear Lake, Minnesota |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Delhi, New York |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sulphur Springs, Texas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mt. Crawford, Virginia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richland Center, Wisconsin |
Each of the Dairy Groups manufacturing facilities also
serves as a distribution facility. In addition, our Dairy Group
has numerous distribution branches located across the country,
some of which are owned but most of which are leased. The Dairy
Groups headquarters are located in Dallas, Texas in leased
premises.
WhiteWave Foods Company
The WhiteWave Foods Company segment owns the following
properties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
Facilities | |
|
Locations of Facilities |
|
|
| |
|
|
Manufacturing Facilities
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Boulder, Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bridgeton, New Jersey |
In addition, WhiteWave Foods Company conducts soy extraction
operations at three Dairy Group manufacturing facilities and at
one facility owned and operated by a third-party manufacturer.
WhiteWave Foods Company also owns two organic dairy farms
located in Paul, Idaho and Kennedyville, Maryland.
WhiteWave Foods Companys headquarters are located in
leased premises in Boulder, Colorado.
Specialty Foods Group
Our Specialty Foods Group segment currently conducts its
manufacturing operations from facilities in the following
locations, all of which are owned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
Facilities | |
|
Locations of Facilities |
|
|
| |
|
|
Manufacturing Facilities
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
LaJunta, Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Hampton, Iowa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chicago, Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dixon, Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pecatonica, Illinois |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plymouth, Indiana |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wayland, Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Faison, North Carolina |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portland, Oregon |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Green Bay, Wisconsin |
The Specialty Foods Groups headquarters are located at its
facility in Green Bay, Wisconsin.
18
International Group
Our International Group currently manufactures its products from
facilities in the following locations, all of which are owned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
Facilities | |
|
Locations of Facilities |
|
|
| |
|
|
Manufacturing Facilities
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
Alpiarca, Portugal |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Avila, Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meira, Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Meruelo, Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pontedeume, Spain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aberystwyth, United Kingdom |
The International Groups headquarters are located in owned
premises in Pontedeume, Spain.
Corporate
Our corporate headquarters are located in leased premises at
2515 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75201.
|
|
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
We are not party to, nor are our properties the subject of, any
material pending legal proceedings. However, we are parties from
time to time to certain claims, litigation, audits and
investigations. We believe that we have established adequate
reserves to satisfy any potential liability we may have under
all such claims, litigations, audits and investigations that are
currently pending. In our opinion, the settlement of any such
currently pending or threatened matter is not expected to have a
material adverse impact on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
|
|
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
No matter was submitted by us during the fourth quarter of 2004
to a vote of security holders, through the solicitation of
proxies or otherwise.
19
PART II
|
|
Item 5. |
Market for Our Common Stock and Related Matters |
Our common stock began trading on the Nasdaq National Market on
April 17, 1996, and continued trading on the Nasdaq until
March 5, 1997, when it began trading on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol SZA. We changed our
trading symbol to DF effective December 24,
2001. The following table sets forth the high and low sales
prices of our common stock as quoted on the New York Stock
Exchange for the last two fiscal years. At March 11, 2005,
there were approximately 6,054 record holders of our common
stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$ |
28.98 |
|
|
$ |
24.76 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
31.50 |
|
|
|
28.41 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
33.52 |
|
|
|
27.96 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
33.25 |
|
|
|
30.01 |
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
36.86 |
|
|
|
31.15 |
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
37.40 |
|
|
|
32.76 |
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
37.44 |
|
|
|
29.87 |
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
33.25 |
|
|
|
28.46 |
|
2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter (through March 11, 2005)
|
|
|
35.60 |
|
|
|
31.74 |
|
We have never declared or paid a cash dividend on our common
stock. Our current intention is to retain all earnings to fund
working capital fluctuations, capital expenditures and scheduled
debt repayments, and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends
on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Moreover, our
senior credit facility contains certain restrictions on our
ability to pay cash dividends. See Item 7.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital
Resources Current Debt Obligations and
Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information regarding the terms of our senior credit facility.
The following table summarizes the repurchase of our common
stock during 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
At End of Period, | |
|
(or Approximate | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Dollar Value) of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) | |
|
Shares (or Units) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as | |
|
that May Yet | |
|
|
Total Number of | |
|
Average | |
|
Part of Publicly | |
|
be Purchased | |
|
|
Shares (or Units) | |
|
Price Paid | |
|
Announced Plans | |
|
Under the Plans | |
Period (1) |
|
Purchased | |
|
Per Share(2) | |
|
or Programs | |
|
or Programs(3) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
March 2004
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
34.40 |
|
|
|
41,941,466 |
|
|
$ |
109.4 million |
|
August 2004
|
|
|
2,170,000 |
|
|
|
36.22 |
|
|
|
44,111,466 |
|
|
|
31.2 million |
|
September 2004
|
|
|
5,655,000 |
|
|
|
30.67 |
|
|
|
49,766,466 |
|
|
|
57.7 million |
|
October 2004
|
|
|
1,335,000 |
|
|
|
29.70 |
|
|
|
51,101,466 |
|
|
|
118.0 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9,310,000 |
|
|
|
31.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Repurchases during 2004 were made only in the months listed.
There have been no repurchases during the period January 1,
2005 through March 11, 2005. |
|
(2) |
Excludes fees and commissions paid on stock repurchases. |
|
(3) |
Amount represents maximum amount authorized for share
repurchases. The amount can be increased by actions of our Board
of Directors. |
20
|
|
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
The following selected financial data as of and for each of the
five years in the period ended December 31, 2004 has been
derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The
selected financial data do not purport to indicate results of
operations as of any future date or for any future period. The
selected financial data should be read in conjunction with our
Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002(1) | |
|
2001(1) | |
|
2000(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands except share data) | |
Operating data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales(2)
|
|
$ |
10,822,285 |
|
|
$ |
9,184,616 |
|
|
$ |
8,991,464 |
|
|
$ |
5,974,555 |
|
|
$ |
5,499,712 |
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
8,257,756 |
|
|
|
6,808,207 |
|
|
|
6,642,773 |
|
|
|
4,574,258 |
|
|
|
4,150,170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,564,529 |
|
|
|
2,376,409 |
|
|
|
2,348,691 |
|
|
|
1,400,297 |
|
|
|
1,349,542 |
|
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and distribution
|
|
|
1,512,507 |
|
|
|
1,345,065 |
|
|
|
1,321,763 |
|
|
|
794,937 |
|
|
|
756,445 |
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
349,683 |
|
|
|
317,342 |
|
|
|
337,496 |
|
|
|
176,642 |
|
|
|
174,353 |
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles(3)
|
|
|
6,650 |
|
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
7,775 |
|
|
|
51,361 |
|
|
|
49,776 |
|
|
|
Facility closing and reorganization costs
|
|
|
34,695 |
|
|
|
11,787 |
|
|
|
19,050 |
|
|
|
9,550 |
|
|
|
2,747 |
|
|
|
Other operating (income) expense(4)
|
|
|
(5,899 |
) |
|
|
(68,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17,306 |
) |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,897,636 |
|
|
|
1,610,424 |
|
|
|
1,686,084 |
|
|
|
1,015,184 |
|
|
|
990,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
666,893 |
|
|
|
765,985 |
|
|
|
662,607 |
|
|
|
385,113 |
|
|
|
358,721 |
|
Other (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense(5)
|
|
|
204,770 |
|
|
|
181,134 |
|
|
|
197,685 |
|
|
|
103,820 |
|
|
|
99,329 |
|
|
Financing charges on trust issued preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,164 |
|
|
|
33,578 |
|
|
|
33,581 |
|
|
|
33,595 |
|
|
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
7,899 |
|
|
|
23,620 |
|
|
|
(11,453 |
) |
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(2,625 |
) |
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
4,817 |
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
204,517 |
|
|
|
192,429 |
|
|
|
241,822 |
|
|
|
165,838 |
|
|
|
121,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
462,376 |
|
|
|
573,556 |
|
|
|
420,785 |
|
|
|
219,275 |
|
|
|
237,483 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
177,002 |
|
|
|
217,853 |
|
|
|
152,988 |
|
|
|
80,160 |
|
|
|
92,489 |
|
Minority interest in earnings(6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
31,431 |
|
|
|
29,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
285,374 |
|
|
|
355,703 |
|
|
|
267,751 |
|
|
|
107,684 |
|
|
|
115,083 |
|
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
3,592 |
|
|
|
3,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
285,374 |
|
|
|
355,703 |
|
|
|
260,399 |
|
|
|
111,276 |
|
|
|
118,719 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,983 |
) |
|
|
(1,446 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
|
$ |
175,416 |
|
|
$ |
109,830 |
|
|
$ |
118,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.05 |
) |
|
|
.04 |
|
|
|
.04 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.63 |
) |
|
|
(.02 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.24 |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.05 |
) |
|
|
.03 |
|
|
|
.03 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.51 |
) |
|
|
(.01 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
154,635,979 |
|
|
|
145,201,412 |
|
|
|
135,031,274 |
|
|
|
84,454,194 |
|
|
|
84,585,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
160,704,576 |
|
|
|
160,695,670 |
|
|
|
163,163,904 |
|
|
|
110,676,222 |
|
|
|
110,013,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock
dividends(7)
|
|
|
3.10 |
x |
|
|
3.53 |
x |
|
|
2.78 |
x |
|
|
2.86 |
x |
|
|
2.68x |
|
Balance sheet data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$ |
7,756,368 |
|
|
$ |
6,992,536 |
|
|
$ |
6,582,266 |
|
|
$ |
6,691,897 |
|
|
$ |
3,780,478 |
|
|
Long-term debt(8)
|
|
|
3,257,259 |
|
|
|
2,791,514 |
|
|
|
2,727,924 |
|
|
|
3,068,497 |
|
|
|
1,353,269 |
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
341,531 |
|
|
|
279,823 |
|
|
|
312,110 |
|
|
|
196,189 |
|
|
|
53,753 |
|
|
Mandatorily redeemable convertible trust issued preferred
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
585,177 |
|
|
|
584,605 |
|
|
|
584,032 |
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,661,137 |
|
|
|
2,542,813 |
|
|
|
1,643,293 |
|
|
|
1,475,880 |
|
|
|
598,832 |
|
21
|
|
(1) |
Balances for 2000 through 2002 have been adjusted to remove our
Puerto Rico operations, which have been reclassified as
discontinued operations. |
|
(2) |
Net sales have been restated to reflect the adoption of Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 01-09
Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a
Customer. The net effect was to decrease net sales by
$33.7 million and $29.9 million in 2001 and 2000,
respectively. There was no impact on our net income as a result
of the adoption of this issue. |
|
(3) |
On January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which
requires, among other things, that goodwill and other intangible
assets with indefinite lives no longer be amortized and that
recognized intangible assets with finite lives be amortized over
their respective useful lives. As required by
SFAS No. 142, our results for periods prior to 2002
have not been restated. |
|
(4) |
Results for 2004 include a gain of $5.9 million primarily
related to the settlement of litigation. Results for 2003
include a gain of $66.2 million on the sale of our frozen
pre-whipped topping and frozen creamer operations and a gain of
$2.5 million related to the divestiture of 11 facilities in
2001. Results for 2001 include a gain of $47.5 million on
the divestiture of 11 facilities offset by an expense of
$28.5 million resulting from a payment to a supplier as
consideration for modifications to an agreement and an
impairment charge of $1.7 million on a water plant. Results
in 2000 include litigation settlement costs of $7.5 million. |
|
(5) |
Results for 2004 include a charge of $32.6 million to
write-off deferred financing costs related to the refinancing of
our credit facility. Results for 2001 and 2000 have been
restated to reflect the adoption of SFAS No. 145
Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64,
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 and Technical
Corrections. Gains and losses that were previously
recorded as extraordinary items related to the early
extinguishment of debt, which were a $7.3 million loss in
2001 and a $7.7 million gain in 2000, have been
reclassified to interest expense. There was no effect on net
income. |
|
(6) |
In December 2001, in connection with our acquisition of the
former Dean Foods Company (Legacy Dean), we
purchased Dairy Farmers of Americas 33.8% interest in our
Dairy Group. |
|
(7) |
For purposes of calculating the ratio of earnings to combined
fixed charges and preferred stock dividends,
earnings represents income before income taxes plus
fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest on
all debt, amortization of deferred financing costs and the
portion of rental expense that we believe is representative of
the interest component of rent expense. |
|
(8) |
Includes amounts outstanding under subsidiary lines of credit
and the current portion of long-term debt. |
22
|
|
Item 7. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
Business Overview
We are a leading food and beverage company. Our Dairy Group is
the largest processor and distributor of milk and various other
dairy products in the United States. The Dairy Group
manufactures and sells its products under a variety of local and
regional brand names and under customer private labels. Our
WhiteWave Foods Company manufactures, markets and sells a
variety of well known soy, dairy and dairy-related nationally
branded products including, for example: Silk®
soymilk and cultured soy products; Horizon Organic®
dairy products, juices and other products; International
Delight® coffee creamers; Maries®
refrigerated dips and dressings; and LAND O
LAKES® fluid dairy and cultured products. Our Specialty
Foods Group is the leading private label pickle processor in the
United States and a maker of a variety of other food products.
In January 2005, we announced our intention to pursue a tax-free
spin-off of our Specialty Foods Group segment to our
shareholders. See Developments Since
January 1, 2004 Tax Free Spin-Off of Specialty
Foods Group. We also own the fourth largest dairy
processor in Spain.
Dairy Group Our Dairy Group segment is our
largest segment, with approximately 80% of our consolidated
sales in 2004. Our Dairy Group manufactures, markets and
distributes a wide variety of branded and private label dairy
case products, such as milk, cream, ice cream, cultured dairy
products and juices to retailers, distributors, foodservice
outlets, schools and governmental entities across the United
States. The Dairy Group also manufactures a portion of the
products marketed and sold by WhiteWave Foods Company. Due to
the perishable nature of the Dairy Groups products, our
Dairy Group delivers the majority of its products directly to
its customers stores in refrigerated trucks or trailers
that we own or lease. This form of delivery is called a
direct store delivery or DSD system and
we believe we have one of the most extensive refrigerated DSD
systems in the United States. The Dairy Group sells its products
primarily on a local or regional basis through its local and
regional sales forces, although some national customer
relationships are coordinated by the Dairy Groups
corporate sales department. Most of the Dairy Groups
customers, including its largest customer, purchase products
from the Dairy Group either by purchase order or pursuant to
contracts that are generally terminable at will by the customer.
The Dairy Groups sales are slightly seasonal, with sales
tending to be higher in the third and fourth quarters.
The dairy industry is a mature industry that has traditionally
been characterized by slow to flat growth, low profit margins,
fragmentation and excess capacity. Excess capacity resulted from
the development of more efficient manufacturing techniques, the
establishment of captive dairy manufacturing operations by some
grocery retailers and declining demand for fluid milk products.
Since 1990, the dairy industry has experienced significant
consolidation led in part by us. Consolidation has tended to
lower costs and raise efficiency. However, consumption of
traditional fluid dairy products has continued to decline.
According to the United States Department of Agriculture, per
capita consumption of fluid milk and cream decreased by over 10%
from 1990 to the end of 2003, although total consumption has
remained relatively flat over the same period due to population
increases. Therefore, volume sales growth across the industry
generally remains flat to modest, profit margins generally
remain low and excess manufacturing capacity continues to exist.
In this environment, price competition is particularly intense,
as smaller processors struggle to retain enough volume to cover
their fixed costs. In response to this dynamic, in addition to
the significant competitive pressure caused by the ongoing
consolidation among food retailers, many processors, including
us, are now placing an increased emphasis on product
differentiation, and cost reduction in an effort to increase
consumption, sales and margins.
Our Dairy Group has several competitors in each of our major
product and geographic markets. Competition between dairy
processors for shelf-space with retailers is based primarily on
price, service and quality, while competition for consumer sales
is based on a variety of factors such as brand recognition,
price, taste preference and quality. Dairy products also compete
with many other beverages and nutritional products for consumer
sales.
WhiteWave Foods Company The WhiteWave Foods
Companys operations have historically been conducted
through three distinct operating units: White Wave, Inc.
(White Wave), Horizon Organic and Dean National
Brand Group. We are currently in the process of consolidating
these three operating units and
23
expect the consolidation to be completed in 2006. WhiteWave
Foods Company manufactures, develops, markets and sells a
variety of nationally-branded soy, dairy and dairy-related
products, such as Silk soymilk and cultured soy products;
Horizon Organic dairy products, juices and other
products; International Delight coffee creamers; and
LAND OLAKES creamers and cultured products.
WhiteWave Foods Company also sells Sun Soy® soymilk;
The Organic Cow of Vermont® organic dairy products;
White Wave® and Tofu Town® branded tofu;
Hersheys® milks and milkshakes;
Maries dips and dressings; and Naturally
Yours® sour cream. We license the LAND OLAKES
and Hersheys names from third parties.
WhiteWave Foods Company sells its products to a variety of
customers, including grocery stores, club stores, natural foods
stores, mass merchandisers, convenience stores and foodservice
outlets. In 2004, approximately 84% of WhiteWave Foods
Companys sales were to retailers and approximately 8% were
to foodservice outlets. WhiteWave Foods Companys customer
base is diverse, with no single customer representing more than
10% of sales in 2004. WhiteWave Foods Company sells its products
through its internal sales force and through independent
brokers. The majority of WhiteWave Foods Companys products
are sold pursuant to customer purchase order or pursuant to
contracts that are generally terminable at will by the customer.
WhiteWave Foods Company has several competitors in each of its
product markets. Competition to obtain shelf-space with
retailers for a particular product is based primarily on the
expected or historical sales performance of the product compared
to its competitors. Also, in some cases, WhiteWave Foods Company
pays fees to retailers to obtain shelf-space for a particular
product. Competition for consumer sales is based on many
different factors, including brand recognition, price, taste
preferences and quality. Consumer demand for soy and organic
foods has grown rapidly in recent years due to growing consumer
confidence in the health benefits of soy and organic foods, and
WhiteWave Foods Company has a leading position in the soy and
organic foods category. However, our soy and organic food
products compete with many other beverages and nutritional
products for consumer sales.
Specialty Foods Group Our Specialty Foods
Group is the nations leading private label pickle
processor, and one of the largest manufacturers and sellers of
non-dairy powdered creamer in the United States. The Specialty
Foods Group also manufactures and sells a variety of other
foods, such as aseptic sauces and puddings. In January 2005 we
announced our intention to pursue a tax-free spin-off of our
Specialty Foods Group segment. See
Developments since January 1, 2004.
The Specialty Foods Groups products are delivered to
customers stores and warehouses primarily by common
carrier. The Specialty Foods Group sells its products through
its internal sales force and through independent brokers. Most
of the Specialty Foods Groups customers purchase products
from the Specialty Foods Group either by purchase order or
pursuant to contracts that are generally terminable at will by
the customer.
The Specialty Foods Group has several competitors in each of its
product markets. In sales of private label products, the
principal competitive factors are price relative to other
private label suppliers, product quality and quality of service.
For the Specialty Foods Groups branded products,
competition to obtain shelf-space with retailers is based on the
expected or historical sales performance of the product compared
to its competitors. In certain cases, the Specialty Foods Group
pays fees to retailers to obtain shelf-space for a particular
company-branded product. Competition for consumer sales is based
on brand recognition, price, taste preferences, and quality.
International Group Our International Group,
which does not qualify as a reportable segment, manufactures,
markets and sells private label and branded milk, butter and
cream through its internal sales force to retailers and
distributors across Spain and Portugal. Also, effective
January 1, 2005, our Rachels Organic Dairy business,
which has historically been part of Horizon Organics
operations, was transferred to the International Group.
24
Developments Since January 1, 2004
|
|
|
Reorganization of WhiteWave Foods Company |
In the third quarter of 2004, we announced our intention to
consolidate the three businesses included within our WhiteWave
Foods Company segment (formerly the Branded Products Group
segment) into a single operating unit. We believe this
consolidation will allow us to interact with customers more
efficiently and effectively as a single sales and marketing
organization, and will enable us to create a simplified and more
efficient supply chain for our branded business. We have
completed the consolidation of the sales, marketing and research
and development organization for the three companies, and in the
third quarter of 2005, the employees of the new company will
move to a new headquarters located in Broomfield, Colorado. The
full integration of these businesses will be a lengthy process
involving all aspects of the three companies operations,
including purchasing, manufacturing, distribution and
administration, and will include the selection and
implementation of a new information technology platform. As part
of our overall reorganization of WhiteWave Foods Company into a
unified branded consumer packaged goods company, we also intend
to bring in-house certain manufacturing activities that are
currently being done by third parties.
In addition, effective March 11, 2005, Mr. Steve
Demos, President of WhiteWave Foods Company resigned his
position. We have retained a leading executive recruiting firm
to assist in the search for a new president. Mr. Gregg
Engles, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
has assumed direct leadership of WhiteWave Foods Company on an
interim basis.
|
|
|
Tax-Free Spin-Off of Specialty Foods Group |
On January 27, 2005, we announced our intent to pursue a
tax-free spin-off of our Specialty Foods Group. The spin-off
will create a publicly traded food manufacturing company serving
the retail grocery and foodservice markets with approximately
1,800 employees and estimated 2005 net sales of over
$700 million. Also effective January 27, 2005, we
hired a management team, headed by Sam Reed, former CEO of
Keebler Foods Company, to lead the new company. In conjunction
with their employment, the management team made a cash
investment of $10 million in the Specialty Foods Group,
representing 1.7% ownership of the new business.
As part of the spin-off, we intend to transfer our Mocha
Mix® non-dairy creamer, Second Nature® egg
substitute and foodservice salad dressings businesses to the
Specialty Foods Group from WhiteWave Foods Company and our Dairy
Group.
The spin-off is intended to take the form of a tax-free
distribution to our shareholders of a new publicly traded stock,
which we expect to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange. We
expect the spin-off to be completed in the third quarter of
2005, subject to confirmation by the Internal Revenue Service of
the tax-free nature of the transaction, registration of the new
security with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other
customary closing conditions.
On October 15, 2004, our Dairy Group acquired Milk Products
of Alabama, a dairy manufacturer based in Decatur, Alabama. Milk
Products of Alabama had net sales of approximately
$34 million in 2003. As a result of this acquisition, we
have expanded our production capabilities in the southeastern
United States, allowing us to better serve our customers. Milk
Products of Alabamas results of operations are now
included in the Morningstar division of our Dairy Group. We paid
approximately $23.2 million for the purchase of Milk
Products of Alabama, including costs of acquisition, and funded
the purchase price with borrowings under our senior credit
facility.
On May 31, 2004, Leche Celta, our Spanish subsidiary,
acquired Tiger Foods, a dairy processing business with one
facility located in Avila, Spain. Tiger Foods, which had net
sales of approximately $29 million in
25
2003, manufactures and distributes branded and private label UHT
milk and dairy-based drinks throughout Spain, with an emphasis
in the southern and central regions. Tiger Foods
operations complement our Spanish operations and we expect this
acquisition to allow us to reduce our transportation costs for
raw milk and finished products due to the new facilitys
geographic proximity to our raw milk suppliers and certain
customers. We paid approximately $21.9 million for the
purchase of the company, all of which was funded with borrowings
under our senior credit facility.
On April 5, 2004, our WhiteWave Foods Company acquired a
soy processing and packaging facility located in Bridgeton, New
Jersey. Prior to the acquisition, the previous owner of the
facility co-packed Silk products for us at the facility.
As a result of the acquisition, we have increased our in-house
processing and packaging capabilities for our soy products,
resulting in cost reductions. We paid approximately
$25.7 million for the purchase of the facility, all of
which was funded using borrowings under our senior credit
facility.
In 2002, we purchased a perpetual license to use the LAND
OLAKES brand on certain dairy products nationally,
excluding cheese and butter. This perpetual license was subject,
however, to a pre-existing sublicense entitling a competitor to
manufacture and sell cream, sour cream and whipping cream in
certain channels in the eastern United States. Effective
March 31, 2004, we acquired that sublicense and certain
customer relationships of the sublicensee (LAND
OLAKES East) for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $17 million, all of which was funded using
borrowings under our senior credit facility. We now have the
exclusive right to use the LAND OLAKES brand on
certain dairy products (other than cheese and butter) throughout
the entire United States.
On January 26, 2004, our Dairy Group acquired Ross Swiss
Dairies, a dairy distributor based in Los Angeles, California,
which had net sales of approximately $120 million in 2003.
As a result of this acquisition, we have increased the
distribution capability of our Dairy Group in southern
California, allowing us to better serve our customers. Ross
Swiss Dairies has historically purchased a significant portion
of its products from other processors. Now the majority of
products distributed by Ross Swiss Dairies are manufactured in
our southern California facilities. We paid approximately
$21.8 million, including transaction costs, for the
purchase of Ross Swiss Dairies and funded the purchase price
with borrowings under our receivables-backed facility.
On January 2, 2004, we completed the acquisition of the 87%
of Horizon Organic Holding Corporation (Horizon
Organic) that we did not already own. Horizon Organic had
sales of over $200 million during 2003. We already owned
approximately 13% of the outstanding common stock of Horizon
Organic as a result of investments made in 1998. Third-party
co-packers, including us, have historically done all of Horizon
Organics manufacturing. During 2003, we produced
approximately 27% of Horizon Organics fluid dairy
products. We also distributed Horizon Organics products in
several parts of the country. Horizon Organic is a leading
branded organic foods company in the United States. Because
organic foods are gaining popularity with consumers and because
Horizon Organics products offer consumers an alternative
to our Dairy Groups traditional dairy products, we believe
Horizon Organic is an important addition to our portfolio of
brands. The aggregate purchase price for the 87% of Horizon
Organic that we did not already own was approximately
$287 million, including approximately $217 million of
cash paid to Horizon Organics stockholders, the repayment
of approximately $40 million of borrowings under Horizon
Organics former credit facility, and transaction expenses
of approximately $9 million, all of which was funded using
borrowings under our senior credit facility and our
receivables-backed facility. In addition, each of the options to
purchase Horizon Organics common stock outstanding on
January 2, 2004 was converted into an option to purchase
26
..7301 shares of our stock, with an aggregate fair value of
approximately $21 million. Beginning with the first quarter
of 2004, Horizon Organics financial results are reported
in our WhiteWave Foods Company segment.
See Note 2 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information about our acquisitions.
|
|
|
Facility Closing and Reorganization Activities |
As part of our continued reorganization and cost reduction
efforts in our Dairy Group, we closed eight Dairy Group
facilities in 2004. The closed facilities were located in
Lansing, Michigan; Wilkesboro, North Carolina; Madison,
Wisconsin; Sulphur Springs, Texas; San Leandro and South
Gate, California; Westwego, Louisiana and Pocatello, Idaho.
On September 7, 2004, we announced our plan to exit the
nutritional beverages business operated by our Specialty Foods
Group segment, including the closure of a manufacturing facility
in Benton Harbor, Michigan. In 2004, we experienced significant
declines in volume on this product line and we believed those
volumes could not be replaced without a significant investment
in capital and research and development. We ceased nutritional
beverages production in December 2004.
We recorded a total of approximately $34.7 million in
facility closing and reorganization costs during 2004. We expect
to incur additional charges related to these restructuring plans
of approximately $7.1 million, primarily in 2005. These
charges include the following costs:
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions as a result of facility closings, facility
reorganizations and consolidation of administrative functions; |
|
|
|
Shutdown costs, including those costs necessary to prepare
abandoned facilities for closure; |
|
|
|
Costs incurred after shutdown such as lease obligations or
termination costs, utilities and property taxes; |
|
|
|
Costs associated with the reorganization of WhiteWave Foods
Companys supply chain and distribution activities,
including termination of certain contractual agreements; and |
|
|
|
Write-downs of property, plant and equipment and other assets,
primarily for asset impairments as a result of facilities that
are no longer used in operations. The impairments relate
primarily to owned buildings, land and equipment at the
facilities, which are written down to their estimated fair value
and held for sale. |
See Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information regarding our facility closing and
reorganization activities.
|
|
|
Construction of New Facilities |
During 2004, our Dairy Group completed construction of a new
dairy manufacturing and distribution facility in Las Vegas,
Nevada. This facility commenced operations in the third quarter
of 2004 and allows us to better serve the southern Nevada,
Arizona and southern Colorado markets. In addition, Leche Celta
finished construction of our first dairy manufacturing facility
in Portugal in the fourth quarter of 2004. The new facility is
located in Alpiarca, Portugal and commenced production in
December 2004. The new facility allows us to expand our Iberian
operations.
During 2004, we spent approximately $297 million, including
commissions and fees, to repurchase 9.3 million shares
of our common stock for an average purchase price of
$31.90 per share. At March 11, 2005, approximately
$118 million remained available under our current
authorization. See Note 11 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
27
|
|
|
Amendment to Credit Facility |
In August 2004, we amended our senior credit facility to
(1) increase the size of our revolving credit facility from
$1 billion to $1.5 billion, (2) increase the size
of our term loan A from $850 million to
$1.5 billion, (3) eliminate term loans B and C and
(4) modify the interest rate and payment terms. When we
amended our credit facility, we were required to write-off
approximately $32.6 million of deferred financing costs
that were incurred in connection with our credit facility prior
to the amendment. These costs were being amortized over the
previous terms of the revolving credit facility and term loans.
See Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Results of Operations
The following table presents certain information concerning our
financial results, including information presented as a
percentage of net sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
10,822.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
9,184.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
8,991.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
8,257.8 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
|
6,808.2 |
|
|
|
74.1 |
|
|
|
6,642.8 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,564.5 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
2,376.4 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
2,348.7 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and distribution
|
|
|
1,512.5 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
1,345.1 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
1,321.8 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
349.7 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
317.3 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
337.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Facility closing and reorganization costs
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(68.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,897.6 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
1,610.4 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
1,686.1 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
666.9 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
$ |
766.0 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
% |
|
$ |
662.6 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003 Consolidated Results |
Net Sales Consolidated net sales increased
approximately 17.8% to $10.82 billion during 2004 from
$9.18 billion in 2003. Net sales by segment are shown in
the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
$ Increase/ | |
|
% Increase/ | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
8,646.4 |
|
|
$ |
7,542.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,104.3 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
1,188.4 |
|
|
|
713.4 |
|
|
|
475.0 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
676.8 |
|
|
|
684.2 |
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
310.7 |
|
|
|
244.9 |
|
|
|
65.8 |
|
|
|
26.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
10,822.3 |
|
|
$ |
9,184.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,637.7 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
The change in net sales was due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Sales 2004 vs. 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Pricing, Volume | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
and Product | |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Divestitures | |
|
Exchange | |
|
Mix Changes | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
386.2 |
|
|
$ |
(26.2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
744.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,104.3 |
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
282.8 |
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
196.2 |
|
|
|
475.0 |
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
19.7 |
|
|
|
65.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
693.7 |
|
|
$ |
(30.2 |
) |
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
$ |
946.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,637.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales increased approximately $1.64 billion during 2004
compared to the prior year primarily due to higher selling
prices resulting from the pass-through of increased raw milk
costs and due to acquisitions. We acquired Kohler Mix
Specialties, Melody Farms and Ross Swiss Dairies in our Dairy
Group segment; Horizon Organic and LAND OLAKES East
in our WhiteWave Foods Company segment; Cremora® in
our Specialty Foods Group segment; and Tiger Foods in our
Corporate/ Other segment.
Cost of Sales All expenses incurred to bring
a product to completion are included in cost of sales, such as
raw material, ingredient and packaging costs; labor costs; plant
and equipment costs, including costs to operate and maintain our
coolers and freezers; and costs associated with transporting our
finished products from our manufacturing facilities to our own
distribution facilities. Our cost of sales ratio increased to
76.3% in 2004 compared to 74.1% in 2003 due almost entirely to
increased raw material costs that affected all of our segments
in 2004.
Operating Costs and Expenses Our operating
expenses increased approximately $287.2 million, or
approximately 17.8%, during 2004 versus the prior year.
Operating expenses increased primarily due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions, which we estimate represented approximately
$118 million of the increase. |
|
|
|
A $62.8 million decline in other operating income compared
to last year primarily due to a $66.2 million gain on the
sale of our frozen pre-whipped topping business that reduced
operating expenses in 2003. |
|
|
|
Higher fuel costs across all segments and increased volumes at
the WhiteWave Foods Company, which we estimate added a combined
total of approximately $29 million to distribution costs
for 2004 as compared to last year. |
|
|
|
Net facility closing and reorganization costs that were
approximately $22.9 million higher than 2003. |
|
|
|
Corporate expenses that were approximately $10 million
higher than last year, including higher professional fees and
legal fees primarily related to the reorganization of our
WhiteWave Foods Company, increased transactional activity and
higher regulatory compliance fees. |
Our operating expense ratio was consistent at 17.5% for 2004 as
compared to 17.6% for 2003.
Operating Income Operating income during 2004
was $666.9 million, a decrease of $99.1 million from
2003 operating income of $766 million. This decrease was
primarily due to the $66.2 million gain on the sale of our
frozen pre-whipped topping business in 2003. Our operating
margin in 2004 was 6.2% compared to 8.3% in 2003. Our operating
margin decreased primarily as a result of higher raw material
costs and the effect of increased sales.
Other (Income) Expense Total other (income)
expense increased by $12.1 million in 2004 compared to
2003. Interest expense increased to $204.8 million in 2004
from $181.1 million in 2003, primarily due to a charge of
$32.6 million in 2004 to write-off deferred financing costs
related to our senior credit facility amended in August 2004.
This charge was partially offset by lower interest expense due
to lower interest rates
29
during 2004. There were no financing charges on preferred
securities in 2004 as compared to $14.2 million in 2003.
Our convertible preferred securities were converted into common
stock in the second quarter of 2003. See Note 10 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes Income tax expense was recorded
at an effective rate of 38.3% in 2004 compared to 38.0% in 2003.
Our effective tax rate varies based on the relative earnings of
our business units.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003 Results by Segment |
As noted above, we had three reportable segments in 2004: the
Dairy Group, WhiteWave Foods Company and the Specialty Foods
Group.
The key performance indicators of our segments are sales
volumes, gross profit and operating income.
Dairy Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
8,646.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7,542.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
6,655.3 |
|
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
|
5,619.4 |
|
|
|
74.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,991.1 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
1,922.7 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,396.6 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
1,281.7 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
594.5 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
$ |
641.0 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Dairy Groups net sales increased by approximately
$1.10 billion, or 14.6%, in 2004 versus 2003. The change in
net sales from 2003 to 2004 was due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
2003 Net sales
|
|
$ |
7,542.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
386.2 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
(26.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
Volume
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Pricing and product mix
|
|
|
738.0 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Net sales
|
|
$ |
8,646.4 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the Dairy Groups net sales due to pricing
and product mix shown in the above table primarily results from
increased pricing due to the pass through of higher raw milk
costs in 2004. In general, our Dairy Group changes the prices it
charges customers for fluid dairy products on a monthly basis,
as the costs of raw materials fluctuate. Because of competitive
pressures, the price increases do not reflect the entire
increase in raw material costs that we experienced. The
following table sets forth the average monthly Class I
mover and average monthly Class II minimum
prices for raw skim milk and butterfat for 2004 compared to 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31* | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Class I raw skim milk
mover(1)
|
|
$ |
8.44 |
(2) |
|
$ |
7.47 |
(2) |
|
|
13 |
% |
Class I butterfat
mover(1)
|
|
|
1.95 |
(3) |
|
|
1.19 |
(3) |
|
|
64 |
|
Class II raw skim milk
minimum(4)
|
|
|
6.90 |
(2) |
|
|
6.74 |
(2) |
|
|
2 |
|
Class II butterfat
minimum(4)
|
|
|
2.06 |
(3) |
|
|
1.22 |
(3) |
|
|
69 |
|
30
|
|
|
|
* |
The prices noted in this table are not the prices that we
actually pay. The minimum prices applicable at any given
location for Class I raw skim milk or Class I
butterfat are based on the Class I mover plus a location
differential. Class II prices noted in the table are
federal minimum prices, applicable at all locations. Our actual
cost also includes producer premiums, procurement costs and
other related charges that vary by location and vendor. Please
see Part I Item 1.
Business Government Regulation Milk
Industry Regulation and Known Trends and
Uncertainties Prices of Raw Milk, Cream and Other
Inputs for a more complete description of raw milk pricing. |
|
|
(1) |
We process Class I raw skim milk and butterfat into fluid
milk products. |
|
(2) |
Prices are per hundredweight. |
|
(3) |
Prices are per pound. |
|
(4) |
We process Class II raw skim milk and butterfat into
products such as cottage cheese, creams and creamers, ice cream
and sour cream. |
The other primary cause of the increase in the Dairy
Groups net sales was acquisitions. The Dairy Group
acquired Milk Products of Alabama in October 2004, Ross Swiss
Dairies in January 2004, Kohler Mix Specialties in October 2003
and Melody Farms in June 2003, which we estimate contributed a
combined total of $386.2 million in sales during 2004.
These increases in sales were slightly offset by the divestiture
in July 2003 of the frozen pre-whipped topping and frozen
creamer operations.
Volume change for all Dairy Group products, excluding the impact
of acquisitions and divestitures, was an increase of 0.1% in
2004 compared to 2003. Volume sales of milk and cream, which
were approximately 76% of the Dairy Groups 2004 sales,
were up approximately 0.9% for the year compared to USDA data
showing a 0.8% decline in total consumption of milk and cream in
the U.S. during the year.
The Dairy Groups cost of sales ratio was substantially
higher in 2004 at 77% compared to 74.5% for 2003 primarily due
to the increase in raw milk costs compared to the prior year.
The average minimum price of Class I raw skim milk (as
indicated by the Class I mover, described above) was 13%
higher and the average Class I butterfat mover increased
64% in 2004 as compared to 2003. Our costs were also impacted by
resin prices as they continued to rise to unprecedented levels.
Higher resin prices impacted the costs of plastic bottles used
in our production process by approximately $17 million. Due
to a very competitive retail environment in 2004, we were unable
to pass along the entire increase in raw material costs to our
customers.
The Dairy Groups operating expenses increased
approximately $114.9 million during 2004 compared to 2003
primarily due to (1) acquisitions, which we estimate
contributed approximately $61 million in operating costs;
(2) higher fuel costs of which approximately
$14 million was related to an increase in fuel prices and
(3) an increase in insurance expense due to our claims
experience. The increase in sales volumes also contributed to
our higher operating expenses. These increases were partly
offset by a decrease in bad debt expense, primarily due to more
favorable than expected resolution of previously accrued bad
debt reserves. These bad debt reserves were recorded for certain
customers that had experienced economic difficulty and a few
large customers that sought bankruptcy protection over the past
several years. The Dairy Groups operating expense ratio
decreased to 16.1% in 2004 from 17.0% in 2003 due to the effect
of increased sales.
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,188.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
713.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
792.0 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
|
|
|
468.4 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
396.4 |
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
245.0 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
278.0 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
211.4 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
118.4 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
WhiteWave Foods Companys net sales increased by
$475 million, or 66.6%, in 2004 versus 2003. The change in
net sales from 2003 to 2004 was due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
2003 Net sales
|
|
$ |
713.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
282.8 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
% |
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
Volume
|
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
Pricing and product mix
|
|
|
101.9 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Net sales
|
|
$ |
1,188.4 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most significant cause of the increase in WhiteWave Foods
Companys sales was the acquisition of Horizon Organic
effective January 1, 2004, and to a lesser extent the
acquisition of LAND OLAKES East effective
March 31, 2004.
Higher pricing also contributed to the increase in sales. The
two primary drivers of this increase were (1) increased
selling prices in response to increased commodity costs and
(2) a decline in slotting fees, couponing and certain other
promotional costs that are required to be recorded as reductions
of net sales, as we shift our focus toward consumer-oriented
advertising and marketing, which is recorded as operating
expense.
Another significant cause of the increase in sales was increased
volumes. Volume sales for the WhiteWave Foods Company, excluding
the impact of acquisitions and divestitures, increased
approximately 13.2% in 2004 due to the success of our brands,
particularly Silk and International Delight. Silk
volumes increased 25% and International Delight
volumes increased 22% compared to 2003. We believe increased
Silk volumes were due primarily to: (1) increased
consumer acceptance of soy products, resulting in increased
penetration of soymilk in the club, mass merchandiser and
grocery channels; (2) the positive effects of our consumer
advertising; and (3) the introduction of new Silk
products with nutritional enhancements, new flavors and
larger size offerings. We believe the increase in
International Delight volumes is due primarily to
consumer acceptance of new packaging introduced in 2003 and new
low-carb flavors introduced in 2004.
These increases were offset slightly by the divestiture in July
2003 of the branded frozen pre-whipped topping and frozen
creamer operations.
The cost of sales ratio for the WhiteWave Foods Company
increased to 66.6% in 2004 from 65.7% in 2003 primarily due to
the impact of higher raw material costs, particularly
Class II butterfat and organic soybeans, and the addition
of Horizon Organic, which has a higher cost of sales ratio. The
average minimum price of Class II butterfat was 69% higher
in 2004 than in 2003. Our average cost of organic soybeans was
approximately 40% higher in 2004 than in 2003 primarily due to
an increase in domestic organic soybean prices and the
utilization of foreign grown organic soybeans, which have a
higher price than domestic beans.
Operating expenses increased approximately $66.6 million in
2004 compared to the prior year primarily due to acquisitions,
which we estimate contributed approximately $56 million in
costs, and increased volumes and higher fuel costs which
together contributed approximately $11.5 million to
distribution expenses. Marketing spending increased
approximately 6% in 2004 as compared to 2003. These increases
were somewhat offset by a decline of approximately
$16.1 million related to the expiration of the White Wave
management incentive plan in March 2004. The operating expense
ratio decreased to 23.4% during 2004 from 29.6% during the prior
year primarily due to the relatively smaller increase in
operating expense dollars compared to the increase in sales
dollars.
32
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
676.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
684.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
536.7 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
514.9 |
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
140.1 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
169.3 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
71.7 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
68.4 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
$ |
101.3 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Specialty Foods Groups net sales decreased by
$7.4 million, or 1.1%, in 2004 versus 2003. The change in
net sales from 2003 to 2004 was due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
2003 Net sales
|
|
$ |
684.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
Volume
|
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
Pricing and product mix
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 Net sales
|
|
$ |
676.8 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net decrease in sales was due primarily to an overall
decline in volumes in the nutritional beverages and pickle
categories. Pickle volumes declined 2% largely due to a decline
in sales attributable to the bankruptcy of a large customer in
2003 and the loss of a large retail chain customer in 2004.
Private label nutritional beverages sales, which include drinks
in the weight loss/gain, meal supplement and sports categories,
declined approximately $17 million, or 44%. In the fourth
quarter of 2004, we exited the manufacturing of nutritional
beverage products as a result of these significant volume
declines during the year because we believed those volumes could
not be replaced without a significant investment in capital and
research and development.
These decreases in sales were partly offset by an increase in
non-dairy powdered creamer sales due to increased sales to
existing customers and higher pricing. Sales also increased
slightly due to the acquisition of Cremora in December
2003.
The Specialty Foods Groups cost of sales ratio increased
to 79.3% in 2004 from 75.3% in 2003, primarily due to
substantially higher commodity costs, particularly casein,
soybean oil and cheese which increased by a combined total of
approximately $19 million, as well as significant increases
in glass and other packaging costs which increased approximately
$3 million.
Operating expenses for the Specialty Foods Group increased
approximately $3.7 million primarily related to increased
distribution expenses as a result of higher fuel costs. The
Specialty Foods Groups operating expense ratio increased
to 10.6% in 2004 compared to 9.9% during the prior year.
33
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2002 Consolidated Results |
Net Sales Consolidated net sales increased
approximately 2% to $9.18 billion during 2003 from
$8.99 billion in 2002. Net sales by segment are shown in
the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
$ Increase/ | |
|
% Increase/ | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
7,542.1 |
|
|
$ |
7,601.0 |
|
|
$ |
(58.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
713.4 |
|
|
|
517.3 |
|
|
|
196.1 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
684.2 |
|
|
|
673.6 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
244.9 |
|
|
|
199.6 |
|
|
|
45.3 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
9,184.6 |
|
|
$ |
8,991.5 |
|
|
$ |
193.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in net sales was due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Sales 2003 vs. 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Pricing, Volume | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
Foreign | |
|
and Product | |
|
Increase/ | |
|
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Divestitures | |
|
Exchange | |
|
Mix Changes | |
|
(Decrease) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
127.3 |
|
|
$ |
(110.7 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(75.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(58.9 |
) |
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
68.8 |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
131.1 |
|
|
|
196.1 |
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
45.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
196.1 |
|
|
$ |
(128.2 |
) |
|
$ |
40.3 |
|
|
$ |
84.9 |
|
|
$ |
193.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Sales All expenses incurred to bring
a product to completion are included in cost of sales, such as
raw material, ingredient and packaging costs; labor costs; plant
and equipment costs, including costs to operate and maintain our
coolers and freezers; and costs associated with transporting our
finished products from our manufacturing facilities to our own
distribution facilities. Our cost of sales ratio was 74.1% in
2003 compared to 73.9% in 2002. Increased raw material costs
affected all of our segments in 2003. Also, the WhiteWave Foods
Company segment incurred higher costs due to certain
manufacturing inefficiencies related to the introduction of new
products and new technologies, and the realignment of certain
manufacturing operations.
Operating Costs and Expenses Operating
expenses decreased approximately $75.7 million, or 4.5%, in
2003 compared to the prior year. This decrease was mostly due to
(1) a gain of $66.2 million on the sale of frozen
pre-whipped topping and frozen creamer operations in the third
quarter of 2003, (2) a gain of $2.5 million related to
the divestiture of 11 facilities in 2001, which was recorded at
corporate as a result of certain contingencies being favorably
resolved during 2003, and (3) lower facility closing and
other reorganization costs of $11.8 million in 2003
compared to $19.1 million in 2002, primarily due to
differences in the nature of the restructuring activities and to
the timing of recognition of certain charges as a result of our
adoption of SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, in January
2003.
Our operating expense ratio decreased to 17.6% in 2003 as
compared to 18.7% in 2002.
Operating Income Operating income during 2003
was $766 million, an increase of $103.4 million, from
2002 operating income of $662.6 million. Our operating
margin in 2003 was 8.3% compared to 7.4% in 2002. The operating
margin increase was the result of the decline in the operating
expense ratio primarily due to the other operating income
reported in 2003.
Other (Income) Expense Total other (income)
expense decreased by $49.4 million in 2003 compared to
2002. Interest expense decreased to $181.1 million in 2003
from $197.7 million in 2002. This decrease was
34
the result of lower interest rates and lower average debt
balances in 2003. Financing charges on preferred securities were
$14.2 million in 2003 versus $33.6 million in 2002 due
to the conversion of these securities to common stock during the
second quarter of 2003. See Note 10 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Income from investments in unconsolidated affiliates was
$244,000 in 2003 compared to a loss of $7.9 million in
2002. Income in 2003 was related to our approximately 13%
interest in Horizon Organic Holding Corporation. In 2002, we
recorded income of $2.1 million, which was primarily
related to our 36% interest in White Wave through May 9,
2002, when we acquired the remaining equity interest in White
Wave and began consolidating White Waves results with our
financial results. This income was offset in 2002 by a
$10 million loss on our minority interest in Consolidated
Container Company. See Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Income Taxes Income tax expense was recorded
at an effective rate of 38.0% in 2003 compared to 36.4% in 2002.
In 2002 we recorded the favorable settlement of a contested tax
issue. Our tax rate varies as the mix of earnings contributed by
our various business units changes.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2002 Results by Segment |
As noted above, we had three reportable segments in 2004: the
Dairy Group, the WhiteWave Foods Company and the Specialty Foods
Group. Prior periods have been restated to reflect the new
segment reporting structure.
The key performance indicators of our segments are sales
volumes, gross profit and operating income.
Dairy Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
7,542.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
7,601.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
5,619.4 |
|
|
|
74.5 |
|
|
|
5,670.2 |
|
|
|
74.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,922.7 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
1,930.8 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,281.7 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
1,338.3 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
641.0 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
$ |
592.5 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Dairy Groups net sales decreased approximately
$58.9 million, or 0.8%, in 2003 versus 2002. The change in
net sales from 2002 to 2003 was due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
2002 Net sales
|
|
$ |
7,601.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
127.3 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
(110.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
Volume
|
|
|
(159.6 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
Pricing and product mix
|
|
|
84.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Net sales
|
|
$ |
7,542.1 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Dairy Group acquired Kohler Mix Specialties in October 2003
and Melody Farms in June 2003.
The Dairy Groups sales declined primarily due to lower
sales volumes. Volume change for all products, excluding the
effect of acquisitions and divestitures, was a decline of 2.1%
in 2003 compared to 2002. That volume change was driven
primarily by the fluid dairy and ice cream categories.
Equivalent gallons of fluid dairy products sold (including milk
and cream) decreased by approximately 1.1% in 2003. We believe
the decrease was due primarily to continued declining
consumption of traditional fluid dairy products in some
35
parts of the country. Ice cream and ice cream novelty volumes
declined by approximately 7% in 2003 compared to 2002, primarily
because we sell our ice cream under private labels and local
brands, and we believe we lost sales during the year to
nationally branded products which were promoted more
aggressively than our products. In addition, certain private
label products historically sold by the Dairy Group, including
sour cream, whipping cream and coffee creamers, were converted
to sales of LAND O LAKES products, which are
reported in our WhiteWave Foods Company segment.
Net sales also declined by approximately $110.7 million
related to divestitures. We sold our frozen pre-whipped topping
and frozen creamer operations in July 2003. In addition,
beginning in January 2002, we began exiting from the
Lactaid®, Nestlé®
Nesquik® and Nestlé®
Coffeemate® co-packing businesses due to the
termination of the co-packing agreements. Our transition out of
the Lactaid co-packing business was completed in February
2002 and our transition out of the Nestle co-packing
business was completed in February 2003.
These decreases were partly offset by an increase in pricing.
The increase in sales due to pricing and product mix shown in
the above table primarily results from higher raw milk costs in
2003 than in 2002, offset somewhat by price concessions that
were granted in some markets due to competitive pressures. In
general, our Dairy Group changes the prices it charges customers
for fluid dairy products on a monthly basis, as the costs of raw
materials fluctuate. The following table sets forth the average
monthly Class I mover and average monthly
Class II minimum prices for raw skim milk and butterfat for
2003 compared to 2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31* | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
% Change | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Class I raw skim milk
mover(1)
|
|
$ |
7.47 |
(2) |
|
$ |
7.01 |
(2) |
|
|
7 |
% |
Class I butterfat
mover(1)
|
|
|
1.19 |
(3) |
|
|
1.21 |
(3) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Class II raw skim milk
minimum(4)
|
|
|
6.74 |
(2) |
|
|
7.62 |
(2) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Class II butterfat
minimum(4)
|
|
|
1.22 |
(3) |
|
|
1.20 |
(3) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
The prices noted in this table are not the prices that we
actually pay. The federal order minimum prices at any given
location for Class I raw skim milk or Class I
butterfat are based on the Class I mover prices plus a
location differential. Class II prices noted in the table
are federal minimum prices, applicable at all locations. Our
actual cost also includes producer premiums, procurement costs
and other related charges that vary by location and vendor.
Please see Part I Item 1.
Business Government Regulation Milk
Industry Regulation, and Known Trends
and Uncertainties Prices of Raw Milk, Cream and
Other Inputs for a more complete description of raw milk
pricing. |
|
|
(1) |
We process Class I raw skim milk and butterfat into fluid
milk products. |
|
(2) |
Prices are per hundredweight. |
|
(3) |
Prices are per pound. |
|
(4) |
We process Class II raw skim milk and butterfat into
products such as cottage cheese, creams and creamers, ice cream
and sour cream. |
The Dairy Groups cost of sales ratio remained consistent
at 74.5% in 2003 compared to 74.6% in 2002.
The Dairy Groups operating expenses decreased
approximately $56.6 million to $1.28 billion in 2003
from $1.34 billion in 2002. The decrease in the Dairy
Groups operating expenses was primarily due to lower
insurance, advertising, bad debt and bonus expenses in 2003.
Insurance costs (including the costs of self-insurance) declined
in 2003 as a result of better claims experience. Advertising
expenses decreased in 2003 partially because we reduced planned
advertising spending in 2003 in anticipation of the difficult
raw milk environment and also because advertising expense in
2002 was higher than normal as we incurred unusual advertising
costs in order to (1) promote our brands in certain parts
of the country following our acquisition of Legacy Dean, and
(2) promote two local Dairy Group brands affected by
product recalls in 2002. Bad debt expense declined in 2003
compared to 2002. In 2002, some of our customers experienced
economic difficulty and a few large customers sought bankruptcy
protection. Bonus expenses were lower in 2003 than in 2002 as a
result of our actual performance compared to bonus targets.
36
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
713.4 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
517.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
468.4 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
299.6 |
|
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
245.0 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
217.7 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
211.4 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
158.5 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
33.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WhiteWave Foods Companys net sales increased by
$196.1 million, or 37.9%, in 2003 compared to 2002. The
change in net sales from 2002 to 2003 was due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
2002 Net sales
|
|
$ |
517.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
68.8 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
Volume
|
|
|
106.2 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
Pricing and product mix
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Net sales
|
|
$ |
713.4 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We acquired the 64% of White Wave that we did not already own in
May 2002. Therefore, 2003 includes 12 months of White Wave
sales compared to only 8 months in 2002.
Unit volumes for WhiteWave Foods Company, excluding the effect
of acquisitions and divestitures, increased 20.5% overall in
2003 due to the success of our nationally branded products,
particularly Silk.
Sales increased due to pricing, product mix and other changes,
including price increases for several of our products, such as
Hersheys, Maries and LAND OLAKES.
These price increases were partly offset by price reductions for
International Delight in order to clear shelf space for
new plastic packaging that was introduced in the first half of
2003.
The cost of sales ratio for WhiteWave Foods Company increased to
65.7% in 2003 compared to 57.9% in 2002 primarily due to the
impact of (1) short-term manufacturing inefficiencies
related to the introduction of new products and new
technologies, (2) short-term manufacturing inefficiencies
due to certain manufacturing realignments related to the
shifting of certain manufacturing operations to our Dairy Group
Segment, and (3) an additional $15 million of
packaging costs due to the introduction of International
Delight in plastic packaging.
Operating expenses were $211.4 million during 2003 compared
to $158.5 million during 2002. This increase was primarily
due to higher marketing expenses in 2003 related to the
introduction of new products and higher promotional spending on
nationally branded products. Operating expenses were also
significantly impacted by the addition of White Wave in May
2002, including the accrual of almost $10 million more in
2003 than in 2002 for bonuses paid in March 2004 under the White
Wave Performance Bonus Plan that was established when we
acquired White Wave.
37
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
Dollars | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
684.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
673.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
514.9 |
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
498.1 |
|
|
|
73.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
169.3 |
|
|
|
24.7 |
|
|
|
175.5 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income
|
|
$ |
101.3 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
% |
|
$ |
98.9 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Specialty Foods Groups net sales increased by
$10.6 million, or 1.6%, in 2003 versus 2002. The change in
net sales from 2002 to 2003 was due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollars | |
|
Percentage | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in millions) | |
2002 Net sales
|
|
$ |
673.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
(13.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
)% |
|
Volume
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
Pricing and product mix
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 Net sales
|
|
$ |
684.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Specialty Foods Group sold EBI Foods, Ltd. in October 2002.
Excluding the effects of this divestiture, the Specialty Foods
Groups pickle volumes declined 1.6% in 2003 compared to
2002 due to the bankruptcy of a large customer, and to the
overall effects of economic difficulties in the foodservice
sector as a whole. Approximately 28% of the Specialty Foods
Groups sales were to foodservice customers in 2003. This
decrease was more than offset by a 12.8% increase in unit
volumes of non-dairy powdered creamer as a result of new
business and a 15.2% increase in unit volumes of nutritional
beverages due to increased demand.
Pricing was up in all categories primarily due to increased raw
material costs that were passed on to customers in the form of
higher selling prices. Also, promotional spending that is
recorded as a reduction of net sales was down by
$15.3 million in 2003 compared to 2002.
The Specialty Foods Groups cost of sales ratio increased
to 75.3% in 2003 from 73.9% in 2002 as a result of higher raw
material prices, especially glass, and increases in natural gas
prices. The Specialty Foods Group uses a significant amount of
natural gas in its operations.
Operating expenses for the Specialty Foods Group declined to
$68 million in 2003 compared to $76.6 million in 2002
primarily due to the sale of EBI Foods, Ltd. in October 2002,
which had higher operating expenses, and to lower bonus expense.
Bonus expenses were $1.3 million less in 2003 as a result
of our actual performance compared to bonus targets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
During 2004, we met our working capital needs with cash flow
from operations. Net cash provided by operating activities was
$527.7 million for 2004 as contrasted to
$522.3 million for 2003, an increase of $5.4 million.
Net cash provided by operating activities was impacted by:
|
|
|
|
|
An increase of $79.6 million in net income plus non-cash
items in 2004 as compared to 2003 primarily due to the gain on
the sale of our frozen pre-whipped topping and frozen creamer
operations in 2003 offset by; |
38
|
|
|
|
|
An increase in our operating working capital of $183.9 in 2004
as compared to $175.6 million in 2003 due primarily to
increased raw material costs in 2004; |
|
|
|
A decrease of $10 million in income taxes payable in 2004
compared to an increase of $27.9 million in 2003 as our
2004 estimated tax payments more closely approximated our tax
obligation resulting in a lower tax liability at
December 31, 2004; |
|
|
|
A decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets of $436,000 in
2004 compared to a decrease of $20.7 million in 2003
primarily due to higher dispositions of net assets held for sale
in 2003; and |
|
|
|
Lower tax savings on equity compensation of $7.9 million
due to fewer stock option exercises in 2004 compared to the
prior year. |
Net cash used in investing activities was $746.6 million in
2004 compared to $436.2 million in 2003, an increase of
$310.4 million. We used approximately $401.1 million
for acquisitions and $356.1 million for capital
expenditures in 2004 compared to $246.6 million and
$291.7 million in 2003, respectively. We had cash proceeds
from the sale of the frozen pre-whipped topping and frozen
creamer operations and one other small business of
$90 million in 2003.
We used approximately $297 million to repurchase our stock
during 2004. Set forth in the chart below is a summary of the
stock we repurchased in 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares of | |
|
Aggregate | |
|
Average | |
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Purchase | |
|
Purchase Price | |
Period |
|
Repurchased | |
|
Price(1) | |
|
Per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions except | |
|
|
|
|
per share data) | |
January 2004
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
34.42 |
|
August 2004
|
|
|
2,170,000 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
36.24 |
|
September 2004
|
|
|
5,655,000 |
|
|
|
173.5 |
|
|
|
30.69 |
|
October 2004
|
|
|
1,335,000 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
29.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,310,000 |
|
|
$ |
297.0 |
|
|
|
31.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes commissions and fees. |
We received approximately $67.9 million in 2004 as a result
of stock option exercises and employee stock purchases through
our employee stock purchase plan.
We increased our net borrowings by $438.2 million in 2004
compared to a net borrowing of $27 million in 2003.
Senior Credit Facility Our senior credit
facility provides for a $1.5 billion revolving credit
facility and a $1.5 billion term loan. Both the revolving
credit facility and term loan bear interest, at our election, at
the base rate plus a margin that varies from 0 to
62.5 basis points depending on our credit ratings (as
issued by Standard & Poors and Moodys), or
LIBOR plus a margin that varies from 75 to 187.5 basis
points, depending on our credit ratings (as issued by
Standard & Poors and Moodys). The blended
interest rate in effect on borrowings under the senior credit
facility, including the applicable interest rate margin, was
3.72% at December 31, 2004. However, we had interest rate
swap agreements in place that hedged $775 million of our
borrowings under the senior credit facility at an average rate
of 4.96%, plus the applicable interest rate margin. Interest is
payable quarterly or at the end of the applicable interest
period.
39
Principal payments are required on the term loan as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
$56.25 million quarterly beginning on December 31,
2006 through September 30, 2008; |
|
|
|
$262.5 million quarterly beginning on December 31,
2008 through June 30, 2009; and |
|
|
|
A final payment of $262.5 million on the maturity date of
August 13, 2009. |
No principal payments are due on the $1.5 billion revolving
credit facility until maturity on August 13, 2009.
The credit agreement also requires mandatory principal
prepayments upon the occurrence of certain asset dispositions or
recovery events.
In consideration for the revolving commitment, we pay a
quarterly commitment fee on unused amounts of the revolving
credit facility that ranges from 25 to 37.5 basis points,
depending on our credit ratings (as issued by
Standard & Poors and Moodys).
The senior credit facility contains various financial and other
restrictive covenants and requires that we maintain certain
financial ratios, including a leverage and interest coverage
ratio. We are currently, and have always been, in compliance
with all covenants contained in our credit agreement.
Our credit agreement permits us to complete acquisitions that
meet the following conditions without obtaining prior approval:
(1) the acquired company is involved in the manufacture,
processing and distribution of food or packaging products or any
other line of business in which we are currently engaged,
(2) the net cash purchase price is not greater than
$500 million, (3) we acquire at least 51% of the
acquired entity, (4) the transaction is approved by the
Board of Directors or shareholders, as appropriate, of the
target and (5) after giving effect to such acquisition on a
pro-forma basis, we are in compliance with all financial
covenants. All other acquisitions must be approved in advance by
the required lenders.
The senior credit facility also contains limitations on liens,
investments and the incurrence of additional indebtedness, and
prohibits certain dispositions of property and restricts certain
payments, including dividends. The senior credit facility is
secured by liens on substantially all of our domestic assets
(including the assets of our subsidiaries, but excluding the
capital stock of Legacy Deans subsidiaries, and the real
property owned by Legacy Dean and its subsidiaries).
The credit agreement contains standard default triggers,
including without limitation: failure to maintain compliance
with the financial and other covenants contained in the credit
agreement, default on certain of our other debt, and certain
other material adverse changes in our business, and a change in
control. The credit agreement does not contain any default
triggers based on our credit rating.
In August 2004, we amended our senior credit facility to
(1) increase the size of our revolving credit facility from
$1 billion to $1.5 billion, (2) increase the size
of our term loan A from $850 million to
$1.5 billion, (3) eliminate term loans B and C and
(4) modify the interest rate and payment terms. When we
amended our credit facility, we were required to write-off
approximately $32.6 million of deferred financing costs
that were incurred in connection with our credit facility prior
to the amendment. These costs were being amortized over the
previous terms of the revolving credit facility and term loans.
At December 31, 2004, we had outstanding borrowings of
$2.03 billion under our senior credit facility (compared to
$1.78 billion at December 31, 2003), including
$1.5 billion in term loan borrowings and
$531.1 million outstanding under the revolving line of
credit. At December 31, 2004, there were
$129.3 million of letters of credit under the revolving
line that were issued but undrawn. As of March 11, 2005,
approximately $1.80 billion was outstanding under our
senior credit facility.
In addition to our senior credit facility, we also have a
$500 million receivables-backed credit facility, which had
$500 million outstanding at December 31, 2004
(compared to $302.5 million at December 31, 2003). At
December 31, 2004, there was no remaining availability
under this facility. The average interest rate on this facility
at December 31, 2004 was 2.83%. In January 2005, we amended
our receivables-backed loan to increase the facility to
$600 million. Approximately $546 million was
outstanding under this facility at
40
March 11, 2005. See Notes 9 and 23 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for more information about our
receivables-backed facility.
Our outstanding borrowings under the senior credit facility and
receivables-backed credit facility increased from 2003 to 2004
primarily to fund our acquisitions and share repurchases.
Other indebtedness outstanding at December 31, 2004
included $700 million face value of outstanding
indebtedness under Legacy Deans senior notes, a
$30.8 million line of credit at our Spanish subsidiary and
approximately $30.9 million face value of capital lease and
other obligations. See Note 9 to our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The table below summarizes our obligations for indebtedness,
purchase and lease obligations at December 31, 2004. Please
see Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more detail about our lease and purchase obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
Indebtedness, Purchase & |
|
| |
Lease Obligations |
|
Total | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Senior credit facility
|
|
$ |
2,031.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
56.3 |
|
|
$ |
225.0 |
|
|
$ |
431.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,318.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Senior notes(1)
|
|
|
700.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200.0 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
Receivables-backed facility
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign line of credit
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations and other(1)
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Purchasing obligations(2)
|
|
|
485.1 |
|
|
|
325.7 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
488.3 |
|
|
|
100.6 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
71.3 |
|
|
|
60.2 |
|
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
116.3 |
|
Interest payments(3)
|
|
|
330.3 |
|
|
|
99.4 |
|
|
|
66.6 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
81.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
4,596.5 |
|
|
$ |
667.6 |
|
|
$ |
271.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,107.8 |
|
|
$ |
535.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,614.6 |
|
|
$ |
399.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Represents face value. |
|
(2) |
Primarily represents commitments to purchase minimum quantities
of raw materials used in our production processes, including
organic soybeans, organic raw milk and cucumbers. We enter into
these contracts from time to time to ensure a sufficient supply
of raw ingredients. In addition, we have contractual obligations
to purchase various services that are part of our production
process. |
|
(3) |
Only includes our fixed rate interest obligations, which consist
of our senior notes and our interest rate swap agreements. |
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities |
We offer pension benefits through various defined benefit
pension plans and also offer certain health care and life
insurance benefits to eligible employees and their eligible
dependents upon the retirement of such employees. Reported costs
of providing non-contributory defined pension benefits and other
postretirement benefits are dependent upon numerous factors,
assumptions and estimates.
For example, these costs are impacted by actual employee
demographics (including age, compensation levels and employment
periods), the level of contributions made to the plan and
earnings on plan assets. Our pension plan assets are primarily
made up of equity and fixed income investments. Changes made to
the provisions of the plan may also impact current and future
pension costs. Fluctuations in actual equity market returns as
well as changes in general interest rates may result in
increased or decreased pension costs in future periods. Pension
costs may also be significantly affected by changes in key
actuarial assumptions, including anticipated rates of return on
plan assets and the discount rates used in determining the
projected benefit obligation and pension costs.
In accordance with SFAS No. 87, Employers
Accounting for Pensions, changes in pension obligations
associated with these factors may not be immediately recognized
as pension costs on the income statement, but generally are
recognized in future years over the remaining average service
period of plan participants. As
41
such, significant portions of pension costs recorded in any
period may not reflect the actual level of cash benefits
provided to plan participants. In 2004, we recorded non-cash
expense of $11 million, of which $9.1 million was
attributable to periodic expense and $1.9 million was
attributable to settlements compared to a total of
$15.3 million in 2003, of which $2.5 million was
attributable to settlements. These amounts were determined in
accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 87 and
SFAS No. 88, Employers Accounting for
Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans
and for Termination Benefits.
We decreased the assumed discount rate from a range of 6.0% to
6.5% at December 31, 2003 to 5.75% at December 31,
2004. In selecting assumed rate of return on plan assets, we
considered past performance and economic forecasts for the types
of investments held by the plan, as well as our investment
allocation policy. Plan asset returns were $14.8 million in
2004, a $10.2 million decrease from plan asset returns of
$25 million in 2003. Net periodic pension expense for our
plans is expected to decrease in 2005 to approximately
$10.6 million due primarily to the increase in assets from
$151.6 million as of December 31, 2003 to
$181 million as of December 31, 2004. Based on current
projections, 2005 funding requirements will be approximately
$33.7 million as compared to $43.8 million for 2004.
Additionally, based on current projections, 2005 funding
requirements for our other postretirement benefit obligations
will be approximately $1.8 million as compared to
$2.8 million in 2004.
As a result of lower discount rates at December 31, 2004,
we were required to recognize an additional minimum liability as
prescribed by SFAS No. 87 and SFAS No. 132,
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and
Postretirement Benefits. The accumulated other
comprehensive income component of the additional minimum
liability, which totaled $23.3 million ($14.5 million
net of tax), was recorded as a reduction to stockholders
equity through a charge to Other Comprehensive Income, and did
not affect net income for 2004. The charge to Other
Comprehensive Income will be reversed in future periods to the
extent the fair value of plan assets exceeds the accumulated
benefit obligation. See Notes 13 and 14 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for information regarding retirement plans
and other postretirement benefits.
|
|
|
Other Commitments and Contingencies |
On December 21, 2001, in connection with our acquisition of
Legacy Dean, we issued a contingent, subordinated promissory
note to Dairy Farmers of America (DFA) in the
original principal amount of $40 million. DFA is our
primary supplier of raw milk, and the promissory note is
designed to ensure that DFA has the opportunity to continue to
supply raw milk to certain of our facilities until 2021, or be
paid for the loss of that business. The promissory note has a
20-year term and bears interest based on the consumer price
index. Interest will not be paid in cash, but will be added to
the principal amount of the note annually, up to a maximum
principal amount of $96 million. We may prepay the note in
whole or in part at any time, without penalty. The note will
only become payable if we ever materially breach or terminate
one of our milk supply agreements with DFA without renewal or
replacement. Otherwise, the note will expire at the end of
20 years, without any obligation to pay any portion of the
principal or interest. Payments we make under this note, if any,
will be expensed as incurred.
We also have the following commitments and contingent
liabilities, in addition to contingent liabilities related to
ordinary course litigation, investigations and audits:
|
|
|
|
|
certain indemnification obligations related to businesses that
we have divested; |
|
|
|
certain lease obligations, which require us to guarantee the
minimum value of the leased asset at the end of the
lease; and |
|
|
|
selected levels of property and casualty risks, primarily
related to employee health care, workers compensation
claims and other casualty losses. |
See Note 18 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for
more information about our commitments and contingent
obligations.
42
|
|
|
Future Capital Requirements |
During 2005, we intend to invest a total of approximately
$300 million to $325 million in capital expenditures
primarily for our existing manufacturing facilities and
distribution capabilities. We intend to fund these expenditures
using cash flow from operations. We intend to spend this amount
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Division |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
175 to 180 |
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
105 to 110 |
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
5 to 10 |
|
Other
|
|
|
15 to 25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
300 to 325 |
|
|
|
|
|
In 2005, we expect cash interest to be approximately
$170 million based on current debt levels and cash taxes to
be approximately $85 million to $95 million. We expect
that cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet our
requirements for our existing businesses for the foreseeable
future. As of March 11, 2005, approximately
$1.08 billion was available for future borrowings under our
senior credit facility.
Known Trends and Uncertainties
|
|
|
Prices of Raw Milk, Cream and Other Inputs |
Dairy Group The primary raw material used in
our Dairy Group is raw milk (which contains both raw skim milk
and butterfat). The federal government and certain state
governments set minimum prices for raw milk, and those prices
change on a monthly basis. The regulated minimum prices differ
based on how the raw milk is utilized. Raw milk processed into
fluid milk is priced at the Class I price, and raw milk
processed into products such as cottage cheese, creams and
creamers, ice cream and sour cream is priced at the
Class II price. Generally, we pay the federal minimum
prices for raw milk, plus certain producer premiums (or
over-order premiums) and location differentials. We
also incur other raw milk procurement costs in some locations
(such as hauling, field personnel, etc.). A change in the
federal minimum price does not necessarily mean an identical
change in our total raw milk costs, as over-order premiums may
increase or decrease. This relationship is different in every
region of the country, and sometimes within a region based on
supplier arrangements. However, in general, the overall change
in our raw milk costs can be linked to the change in federal
minimum prices.
In general, our Dairy Group changes the prices that it charges
for Class I dairy products on a monthly basis, as the costs
of raw milk and other materials fluctuate. Prices for some
Class II products are not changed on a monthly basis, but
are changed from time to time as circumstances warrant. There
can be a lag between the time of a raw material cost increase or
decrease and the effectiveness of a corresponding price change
to our customers, especially in the case of Class II
butterfat because Class II butterfat prices for each month
are not announced by the government until after the end of that
month. Also, in some cases we are competitively or contractually
constrained with the means and timing of implementing price
changes. These factors can cause volatility in our earnings. Our
sales and operating profit margin fluctuate with the price of
our raw materials and other inputs.
In 2004, our Dairy Group was adversely affected by extreme
volatility in the prices of raw skim milk and butterfat. In
2005, we expect prices to be somewhat less volatile and lower
than the average price in 2004. Of course raw milk prices are
difficult to predict and we change our forecasts frequently
based on current market activity. If raw milk prices do remain
at or near current levels throughout 2005, we would expect our
sales for 2005 to be less than in 2004 because, in general, we
change the prices of our products to reflect changes in raw
material prices.
Because our Class II products typically have a higher fat
content than that contained in raw milk, we also purchase bulk
cream for use in some of our Class II products. Bulk cream
is typically purchased based on a
43
multiple of the AA butter price on the Chicago Mercantile
Exchange. The prices of AA butter started rising by moderate
amounts in late 2003, and then increased significantly in 2004.
They remained high throughout 2004 and we expect the average
price to be somewhat lower in 2005 than the average price in
2004. Of course, like raw milk prices, bulk cream prices are
difficult to predict and we change our forecasts frequently
based on current market activity. We try to change our prices
based on changes in the price of bulk cream, but sometimes we
are competitively or contractually constrained. Therefore,
increases in bulk cream prices can have an adverse effect on our
results of operations.
Prices for resin, which is used in plastic milk bottles, are
also extremely high and are expected to remain high for the
foreseeable future. Finally, the Dairy Group uses a great deal
of diesel fuel in its direct store delivery system, and diesel
fuel prices are currently very high and expected to remain high
for the foreseeable future. High or volatile fuel and resin
costs can adversely affect the Dairy Groups profitability.
WhiteWave Foods Company A significant raw
material used to manufacture products sold by WhiteWave Foods
Company is organic soybeans. We have entered into supply
agreements for organic soybeans, which we believe will meet our
needs for 2005. Generally, these agreements provide for pricing
at fixed levels. However, should our need for organic soybeans
exceed the quantity that we have under contract, or if the
suppliers do not perform under the contracts, we may have
difficulty obtaining sufficient supply, and the price we would
be required to pay would likely be significantly higher. The
increase in soymilk consumption combined with the increased
demand for organic cattle feed has put pressure on the supply of
organic soybeans and there is significant upward pressure on
organic soybean prices. We believe prices for organic soybeans
will continue to increase as the pressure on supply continues.
Another significant raw material used in our organic products is
organic raw milk. Organic raw milk is not readily available and
the growth of our organic dairy business depends on us being
able to procure sufficient quantities of organic raw milk in
time to meet our needs. We obtain our supply of organic raw milk
by entering into one to two year agreements with farmers
pursuant to which the farmers agree to sell us specified
quantities of organic raw milk for fixed prices for the duration
of the agreement We believe, based on currently projected sales
levels, that we have secured a sufficient supply of raw organic
milk to meet our raw organic milk needs for the remainder of
2005. However, should our need for organic raw milk exceed the
quantity that we have under contract, or if the suppliers do not
perform under the contracts, we may have difficulty obtaining
sufficient supply, and the price we would be required to pay, if
we could obtain supply at all, would likely be significantly
higher. Also, as our contracts with farmers expire, we are
generally required to agree to higher prices to renew as a
result of increased competition for organic raw milk supply. For
competitive reasons, WhiteWave Foods Company is not able to pass
along price increases to customers as quickly as the Dairy Group.
Specialty Foods Group Many of the raw
materials used by our Specialty Foods Group also rose to
unusually high levels during 2004, including soybean oil,
casein, cheese and packaging materials. High fuel costs have
also had a negative impact on the Specialty Foods Groups
results. Prices for many of these raw materials and packaging
materials used by the Specialty Foods Group are expected to
remain high and in some cases increase in 2005. For competitive
reasons, the Specialty Foods Group is not able to pass along
increases in raw material and other input costs as quickly as
the Dairy Group. Therefore, the current raw material environment
is expected to continue to adversely affect the Specialty Foods
Groups financial results in 2005.
There has been significant consolidation in the retail grocery
industry in recent years, and this trend is continuing. As our
customer base consolidates, we expect competition to intensify
as we compete for the business of fewer customers. There can be
no assurance that we will be able to keep our existing
customers, or gain new customers. There are several large
regional grocery chains that have captive dairy operations. As
the consolidation of the grocery industry continues, we could
lose sales if any one or more of our existing customers were to
be sold to a chain with captive dairy operations.
44
Many of our retail customers have become increasingly price
sensitive in the current intensely competitive environment. Over
the past few years, we have been subject to a number of
competitive bidding situations in our Dairy Group and Specialty
Foods Group segments, which reduced our profitability on sales
to several customers. We expect this trend to continue. In
bidding situations we are subject to the risk of losing certain
customers altogether. The loss of any of our largest customers
could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.
We do not have contracts with many of our largest customers, and
most of the contracts that we do have are generally terminable
at will by the customer.
Both the difficult economic environment and the increased
competitive environment at the retail level have caused
competition to become increasingly intense at the processor
level. We expect this trend to continue for the foreseeable
future.
Our 2004 tax rate was 38.3%. We estimate the effective tax for
2005 to be slightly less than 38%. Changes in the relative
profitability of our operating segments, as well as recent and
proposed changes to federal and state tax codes may cause the
rate to change from historical rates.
See Risk Factors for a description of
various other risks and uncertainties concerning our business.
Critical Accounting Policies
Critical accounting policies are defined as those
that are both most important to the portrayal of a
companys financial condition and results, and that require
our most difficult, subjective or complex judgments. In many
cases the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is
specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting
principles with no need for the application of our judgment. In
certain circumstances, however, the preparation of our
Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires us to use our judgment
to make certain estimates and assumptions. These estimates
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts
of net sales and expenses during the reporting period. We have
identified the policies described below as our critical
accounting policies. See Note 1 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements for a detailed discussion of these and
other accounting policies.
Accounts Receivable We provide credit terms
to customers generally ranging up to 30 days, perform
ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain
allowances for estimated credit losses. As these factors change,
our estimates change and we could accrue different amounts for
doubtful accounts in different accounting periods. At
December 31, 2004, our allowance for doubtful accounts was
approximately $24.2 million, or approximately 3% of the
accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2004. The
allowance for doubtful accounts, expressed as a percent of
accounts receivable, was approximately 4% at December 31,
2003. Each 0.10% change in the ratio of allowance for doubtful
accounts to accounts receivable would impact bad debt expense by
approximately $880,000.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets Our goodwill
and intangible assets totaled $4.14 billion as of
December 31, 2004 resulting primarily from acquisitions.
Upon acquisition, the purchase price is first allocated to
identifiable assets and liabilities, including trademarks and
customer-related intangible assets, with any remaining purchase
price recorded as goodwill. Goodwill and trademarks with
indefinite lives are not amortized.
We believe that a trademark has an indefinite life if it has
sufficient market share and a history of strong sales and cash
flow performance that we expect to continue for the foreseeable
future. If these perpetual trademark criteria are not met, the
trademarks are amortized over their expected useful lives, which
generally range from five to 40 years. Determining the
expected life of a trademark requires considerable management
judgment and is based on an evaluation of a number of factors
including the competitive environment, market share, trademark
history and anticipated future trademark support.
Perpetual trademarks and goodwill are evaluated for impairment
at least annually to ensure that future cash flows continue to
exceed the related book value. A perpetual trademark is impaired
if its book value
45
exceeds fair value. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment if the
book value of its reporting unit exceeds its fair value. A
reporting unit can be a segment or an operating division. If the
fair value of an evaluated asset is less than its book value,
the asset is written down to fair value based on its discounted
future cash flows.
Amortizable intangible assets are only evaluated for impairment
upon a significant change in the operating environment. If an
evaluation of the undiscounted cash flows indicates impairment,
the asset is written down to its estimated fair value, which is
generally based on discounted future cash flows.
Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the
impact of operating changes and to estimate future cash flows.
Assumptions used in our impairment evaluations, such as
forecasted growth rates and our cost of capital, are consistent
with our internal projections and operating plans.
We did not recognize any impairment charges for perpetual
trademarks or goodwill during 2004.
Purchase Price Allocation We allocate the
cost of acquisitions to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed. All identifiable assets acquired, including
identifiable intangibles, and liabilities assumed are assigned a
portion of the cost of the acquired company, normally equal to
their fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the
cost of the acquired company over the sum of the amounts
assigned to identifiable assets acquired less liabilities
assumed is recorded as goodwill. We record the initial purchase
price allocation based on evaluation of information and
estimates available at the date of the financial statements. As
final information regarding fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed is received and estimates are refined,
appropriate adjustments are made to the purchase price
allocation. To the extent that such adjustments indicate that
the fair values of assets and liabilities differ from their
preliminary purchase price allocations, such difference would
adjust the amounts allocated to those assets and liabilities and
would change the amounts allocated to goodwill. The final
purchase price allocation includes the consideration of a number
of factors to determine the fair value of individual assets
acquired and liabilities assumed including quoted market prices,
forecast of expected cash flows, net realizable values,
estimates of the present value of required payments and
determination of remaining useful lives.
Income Taxes Deferred taxes are recognized
for future tax effects of temporary differences between
financial and income tax reporting using tax rates in effect for
the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. We
periodically estimate our probable tax obligations using
historical experience in tax jurisdictions and informed
judgments. There are inherent uncertainties related to the
interpretations of tax regulations in the jurisdictions in which
we operate. These judgments and estimates made at a point in
time may change based on the outcome of tax audits and changes
to or further interpretations of regulations. If such changes
take place, there is a risk that our tax rate may increase or
decrease in any period, which could have an impact on our
earnings. Future business results may affect deferred tax
liabilities or the valuation of deferred tax assets over time.
Our valuation allowance increased $1.2 million in 2004 due
to the increased likelihood that state net operating losses will
expire before they are used.
Insurance Accruals We retain selected levels
of property and casualty risks, primarily related to employee
health care, workers compensation claims and other
casualty losses. Many of these potential losses are covered
under conventional insurance programs with third-party carriers
with high deductible limits. In other areas, we are self-insured
with stop-loss coverages. Accrued liabilities for incurred but
not reported losses related to these retained risks are
calculated based upon loss development factors which contemplate
a number of variables including claims history and expected
trends. These loss development factors are developed by us in
consultation with external insurance brokers and actuaries. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, we recorded accrued liabilities
related to these retained risks of $146.1 million and
$136.3 million, respectively, including both current and
long-term liabilities.
Employee Benefit Plan Costs We provide a
range of benefits to our employees including pension and
postretirement benefits to our eligible employees and retirees.
We record annual amounts relating to these plans based on
calculations specified by generally accepted accounting
principles, which include various actuarial assumptions, such as
discount rates, assumed investment rates of return, compensation
increases, employee turnover rates and health care cost trend
rates. We review our actuarial assumptions on an annual
46
basis and make modifications to the assumptions based on current
rates and trends when it is deemed appropriate. As required by
generally accepted accounting principles, the effect of the
modifications is generally recorded and amortized over future
periods. Different assumptions that we make could result in the
recognition of different amounts of expense over different
periods of time.
In 2004, we consolidated substantially all of our qualified
pension plans into one master trust. We retained investment
consultants to assist our Investment Committee with the
transition of the plans assets to the master trust and to
help our Investment Committee formulate a long-term investment
policy for the newly established master trust. Our current asset
mix guidelines under the investment policy target equities at
65% to 75% of the portfolio and fixed income at 25% to 35%. At
December 31, 2004, our master trust was invested as
follows: equity securities and limited partnerships
74%; fixed income securities 25%; and cash and cash
equivalents 1%.
We determine our expected long-term rate of return based on our
expectations of future returns for the pension plans
investments based on target allocations of the pension
plans investments. Additionally, we consider the
weighted-average return of a capital markets model that was
developed by the plans investment consultants and
historical returns on comparable equity, debt and other
investments. The resulting weighted average expected long-term
rate of return on plan assets is 8.5%.
While a number of the key assumptions related to our qualified
pension plans are long-term in nature, including assumed
investment rates of return, compensation increases, employee
turnover rates and mortality rates, generally accepted
accounting principles require that our discount rate assumption
be more heavily weighted to current market conditions. As such,
our discount rate likely will change more frequently. In 2004 we
reduced the discount rate utilized to determine our estimated
future benefit obligations from a range of 6.0% to 6.5% at
December 31, 2003 to 5.75% at December 31, 2004.
A 0.25% reduction in the assumed rate of return on plan assets
or a 0.25% reduction in the discount rate would increase our
annual pension expense by approximately $412,000 and $489,000,
respectively. In addition, a 1% increase in assumed healthcare
costs trends would increase the aggregate annual post retirement
medical expense by approximately $184,000.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In
December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003),
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits in an attempt to improve financial
statement disclosures regarding defined benefit plans. This
standard requires that companies provide more details about
their plan assets, benefit obligations, cash flows, benefit
costs and other relevant information. In addition to expanded
annual disclosures, we are required to report the various
elements of pension and other postretirement benefit costs on a
quarterly basis. SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003) is
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003,
and for quarters beginning after December 15, 2003. The
expanded disclosure requirements are included in this report.
On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act)
was signed into law. The Act introduces a prescription drug
benefit under Medicare Part D, as well as a federal subsidy
to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a
benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare
Part D. In April 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position
(FSP) No. SFAS 106-2 to address the
accounting and disclosure requirements related to the Act. The
FSP is effective for interim or annual periods beginning after
September 15, 2004. Substantially all of our postretirement
benefits terminate at age 65. Therefore, the FSP will have
no material affect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements The
FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based
Payment in December 2004. It will require the cost of
employee compensation paid with equity instruments to be
measured based on grant-date fair values. That cost will be
recognized over the vesting period. SFAS No. 123(R)
will become effective for us in the third quarter 2005. We are
still evaluating the impact of
47
SFAS No. 123(R) on our Consolidated Financial
Statements and have not yet determined the transition method we
will apply when we adopt the statement. See Note 1 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements-Stock-Based
Compensation for illustrations of the pro forma impact of
expensing our stock options in the historical periods.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs an Amendment of ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151, which
is effective for inventory costs incurred during years beginning
after June 15, 2005, clarifies the accounting for abnormal
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and
wasted material, requiring that those items be recognized as
current-period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151
requires that allocation of fixed production overheads be based
on the normal capacity of the production facilities. We do not
believe the adoption of this standard will have a material
impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB
Opinion No. 29. SFAS No. 153 is effective
for nonmonetary exchanges occurring in years beginning after
June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the rule
in APB No. 29 which excluded from fair value measurement
exchanges of similar productive assets. Instead,
SFAS No. 153 excludes from fair value measurement
exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial
substance. We do not believe the adoption of this standard will
have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Risk Factors
This report contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Statements that are not historical in nature are forward-looking
statements about our future that are not statements of
historical fact. Most of these statements are found in this
report under the following subheadings:
Part I Item 1. Business,
Part II Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Part II
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk. In some cases, you can identify these
statements by terminology such as may,
will, should, could,
expects, seek to,
anticipates, plans,
believes, estimates,
intends, predicts, projects,
potential or continue or the negative of
such terms and other comparable terminology. These statements
are only predictions, and in evaluating those statements, you
should carefully consider the information above in
Known Trends and Uncertainties, as well
as the risks outlined below. Actual performance or results may
differ materially and adversely.
|
|
|
Reorganization of our WhiteWave Foods Company Segment
Could Temporarily Adversely Affect the Performance of the
Segment |
In the third quarter of 2004, we began the process of
consolidating the operations of the three operating units that
comprise our WhiteWave Foods Company segment into a single
business. We have completed the consolidation of the sales,
marketing and research and development organization for the
three companies, and in the third quarter of 2005, the employees
of the new company will move to a new headquarters located in
Broomfield, Colorado. The full integration of these businesses
will be a lengthy process involving all aspects of the three
companys operations, including purchasing, manufacturing,
distribution and administration, and will include the selection
and implementation of a new information technology platform. As
part of our overall reorganization of WhiteWave Foods Company
into a unified branded consumer packaged goods company, we also
intend to bring in-house certain manufacturing activities that
are currently being done by third parties. We expect the
consolidation to be completed in the next 12 to 18 months.
This process presents a number of challenges and requires a
significant amount of managements attention. Our failure
to successfully manage this process could cause us to incur
unexpected costs or to lose customers or sales, which could have
a material adverse effect on our financial results.
In addition, effective March 11, 2005, Mr. Steve
Demos, President of WhiteWave Foods Company resigned his
position. We have retained a leading executive recruiting firm
to assist in the search for a new president. Mr. Gregg
Engles, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
has assumed direct leadership of WhiteWave Foods Company on an
interim basis. This transition could be disruptive to us in the
short term.
48
|
|
|
Spin-Off of our Specialty Foods Group |
In January 2005, we announced our intent to pursue a tax-free
spin-off of our Specialty Foods Group segment to our
shareholders. Separating the Specialty Foods Group segment from
our business, and completing the successful spin-off will
require a number of operational, legal and regulatory steps be
successfully completed. Completing these steps presents a number
of challenges and will require a significant amount of
managements attention. Our failure to successfully manage
the process could cause us to incur unexpected costs or to lose
customers or sales. In addition, the spin-off is dependent upon
the receipt of a favorable private letter ruling from the
Internal Revenue Service on the tax-free nature of the
transaction. If we fail to receive a favorable letter ruling,
the spin-off will not occur.
|
|
|
Recent Financial Difficulty at Specialty Foods Group
Segment Could Continue Longer Than We Expect |
Our Specialty Foods Group segment experienced financial
difficulty during 2004 due primarily to rising input costs and
to a decline in demand for Specialty Foods Groups line of
nutritional beverages. We exited the nutritional beverages
business at the end of 2004. Also, the former President of the
Specialty Foods Group segment returned to run the business in
late October. With these changes and certain other changes we
are implementing at the Specialty Foods Group, it is our goal to
return the Specialty Foods Group segment to its historical
levels of profitability in 2005. However, there can be no
assurance as to how long it will take to return the Specialty
Foods Group to its historical levels of profitability, if ever.
Many factors are beyond our control, such as the costs of raw
materials and packaging supplies and competitive pressures that
limit our ability to raise prices in reaction to increased input
costs.
|
|
|
Recent Successes of Our Products Could Attract Increased
Competitive Activity, Which Could Impede Our Growth Rate and
Cost Us Sales and, in the Case of Organic Products, Put Pressure
on the Availability of Raw Materials |
Our Silk soymilk and Horizon Organic organic food
and beverage products have leading market shares in their
categories and have benefited in many cases from being the first
to introduce products in their categories. As soy and organic
products continue to gain in popularity with consumers, we
expect our products in these categories to continue to attract
competitors. Many large food and beverage companies have
substantially more resources than we do and they may be able to
market their soy and organic products more successfully than us,
which could cause our growth rate in these categories to be
slower than our forecast and could cause us to lose sales. The
increase in popularity of soy and organic milks is also
attracting private label competitors who sell their products at
a lower price. The success of private label brands could
adversely affect our sales and profitability. Finally, there is
a limited supply of organic raw materials in the United States,
especially organic soybeans and organic raw milk. New entrants
into our markets can reduce available supply and drive up costs.
Even without new entrants, our own rapid growth can put pressure
on the availability and price of organic raw materials.
Our International Delight coffee creamer competes
intensely with Nestlé CoffeeMate business, and our
Hersheys milks and milkshakes compete intensely
with Nestlé Nesquik. Nestle has significantly
greater resources than we do, which allows them to promote their
products more aggressively. Our failure to successfully compete
with Nestle could have a material adverse effect on the sales
and profitability of our International Delight and/or our
Hersheys businesses.
|
|
|
Loss of Rights to Any of Our Licensed Brands Could
Adversely Affect Our Sales and Profits |
We sell certain of our products under licensed brand names such
as Borden®, Hersheys, LAND OLAKES,
Pet® and others. In some cases, we have invested
significant capital in product development and marketing and
advertising related to these licensed brands. Should our rights
to manufacture and sell products under any of these names be
terminated for any reason, our financial performance and results
of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
49
|
|
|
We Have Substantial Debt and Other Financial Obligations
and We May Incur Even More Debt |
We have substantial debt and other financial obligations and
significant unused borrowing capacity. See
Liquidity and Capital Resources.
We have pledged substantially all of our assets (including the
assets of our subsidiaries) to secure our indebtedness. Our high
debt level and related debt service obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
require us to dedicate significant cash flow to the payment of
principal and interest on our debt which reduces the funds we
have available for other purposes, |
|
|
|
may limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes
in our business and market conditions, |
|
|
|
impose on us additional financial and operational
restrictions, and |
|
|
|
expose us to interest rate risk since a portion of our debt
obligations are at variable rates. |
The interest rate on our debt is based on our debt rating, as
issued by Standard & Poors and Moodys. We
have no ability to control the ratings issued by
Standard & Poors and Moodys. A downgrade in
our debt rating could cause our interest rate to increase, which
could adversely affect our ability to achieve our targeted
profitability level, as well as our cash flow.
Our ability to make scheduled payments on our debt and other
financial obligations depends on our financial and operating
performance. Our financial and operating performance is subject
to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business and
other factors, some of which are beyond our control. A
significant increase in interest rates could adversely impact
our net income. If we do not comply with the financial and other
restrictive covenants under our credit facilities, we may
default under them. Upon default, our lenders could accelerate
the indebtedness under the facilities, foreclose against their
collateral or seek other remedies, which would jeopardize our
ability to continue our current operations.
We intend to pursue a tax free spin-off of our Specialty Foods
Group. Our Specialty Foods Group generates positive cash flow
from operations. The loss of income from the Specialty Foods
Group will cause compliance with our debt covenant ratios to
become more difficult. We intend to pay down some of our debt in
2005 to offset the effect of the Specialty Foods Group spin-off
on our ratios; however, there can be no assurance that we will
successfully pay down our debt.
|
|
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
Interest Rate Fluctuations
In order to reduce the volatility of earnings that arises from
changes in interest rates, we manage interest rate risk through
the use of interest rate swap agreements. These swap agreements
provide hedges for loans under our senior credit facility by
limiting or fixing the LIBOR interest rates specified in the
senior credit facility at the interest rates noted below until
the indicated expiration dates.
These swaps have been designated as cash flow hedges against
variable interest rate exposure. The following table summarizes
our various interest rate swap agreements in effect as of
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Interest Rates |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
Notional Amounts | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
5.20% to 6.74%
|
|
|
December 2005 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
3.65% to 6.78%
|
|
|
December 2006 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
The following table summarizes our various interest rate swap
agreements as of December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Interest Rates |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
Notional Amounts | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
1.48% to 6.69%
|
|
|
December 2004 |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
5.20% to 6.74%
|
|
|
December 2005 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
6.78%
|
|
|
December 2006 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
50
We are exposed to market risk under these arrangements due to
the possibility of interest rates on our credit facilities
falling below the rates on our interest rate derivative
agreements. We incurred $20.7 million of additional
interest expense, net of taxes, during 2004 as a result of
interest rates on our variable rate debt falling below the
agreed-upon interest rate on our existing swap agreements.
Credit risk under these arrangements is remote since the
counterparties to our interest rate derivative agreements are
major financial institutions.
A majority of our debt obligations are currently at variable
rates. We have performed a sensitivity analysis assuming a
hypothetical 10% adverse movement in interest rates. As of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the analysis indicated that
such interest rate movement would not have a material effect on
our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
However, actual gains and losses in the future may differ
materially from that analysis based on changes in the timing and
amount of interest rate movement and our actual exposure and
hedges.
Foreign Currency
We are exposed to foreign currency risk due to operating cash
flows and various financial instruments that are denominated in
foreign currencies. Our most significant foreign currency
exposures relate to the euro and the British pound. We have
performed a sensitivity analysis assuming a hypothetical 10%
adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates. As of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the analysis indicated that
such foreign currency exchange rate change would not have a
material effect on our financial position, results of operations
or cash flows.
Butterfat
Our Dairy Group utilizes a significant amount of butterfat to
produce Class II products. This butterfat is acquired
through the purchase of raw milk and bulk cream. Butterfat
acquired in raw milk is priced based on the Class II
butterfat price in federal orders, which is announced near the
end of the applicable month. The Class II butterfat price
can generally be tied to pricing of AA butter traded on the
Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME). The cost of
butterfat acquired in bulk cream is typically based on a
multiple of the AA butter price on the CME. From time to time,
we purchase butter futures and butter inventory in an effort to
better manage our butterfat cost in Class II products.
Futures contracts are marked to market in accordance with
SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and physical inventory
is valued at the lower of cost or market. We are exposed to
market risk under these arrangements if the cost of butter falls
below the cost that we have agreed to pay in a futures contract
or that we actually paid for the physical inventory and we are
unable to pass on the difference to our customers. At this time
we believe that potential losses due to butterfat hedging
activities would not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations or operating cash
flow. During 2004, we recognized losses of $2.5 million,
net of tax, related to our butterfat hedging activities.
51
|
|
Item 8. |
Consolidated Financial Statements |
Our Consolidated Financial Statements for 2004 are included in
this report on the following pages.
52
MANAGEMENT REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL
REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal
control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to
our management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation
and fair presentation of published financial statements.
All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have
inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined
to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with
respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
We have assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004. In making this
assessment, we used the criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Based on our assessment we believe that, as of
December 31, 2004, our internal control over financial
reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm has issued an
audit report on our assessment of our internal control over
financial reporting. This report appears on page F-2.
March 14, 2005
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Dean Foods Company
Dallas, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Dean Foods Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as
of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders equity and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004. We also have audited managements
assessment, included in the accompanying Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting that the
Company maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on criteria
established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Companys
management is responsible for these financial statements, for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting,
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements, an opinion on
managements assessment, and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement and whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit of financial statements included examining,
on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our
audit of internal control over financial reporting included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal
control, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
companys principal executive and principal financial
officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the companys board of directors, management, and other
personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or
improper management override of controls, material misstatements
due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting to
future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of Dean Foods Company and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the
results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period
F-2
ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Also, in our opinion, managements assessment that the
Company maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Furthermore, in our opinion, the Company maintained,
in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, in 2002 the Company changed its method of accounting
for goodwill and other intangible assets to conform to Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142.
DELOITTE & TOUCHE
LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 14, 2005
F-3
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, | |
|
|
except share data) | |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
27,572 |
|
|
$ |
47,143 |
|
|
Receivables, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $24,233
and $32,684
|
|
|
861,759 |
|
|
|
742,934 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
479,981 |
|
|
|
426,478 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
150,151 |
|
|
|
137,055 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
76,961 |
|
|
|
47,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
1,596,424 |
|
|
|
1,400,881 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
1,946,992 |
|
|
|
1,773,555 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,490,129 |
|
|
|
3,197,548 |
|
Identifiable intangible and other assets
|
|
|
722,823 |
|
|
|
620,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,756,368 |
|
|
$ |
6,992,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
$ |
925,199 |
|
|
$ |
924,707 |
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
65,528 |
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
141,227 |
|
|
|
180,158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
1,106,426 |
|
|
|
1,170,393 |
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
3,116,032 |
|
|
|
2,611,356 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
531,242 |
|
|
|
388,151 |
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
341,531 |
|
|
|
279,823 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, 149,222,997 and 154,993,214 shares issued and
outstanding, with a par value of $0.01 per share
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,308,172 |
|
|
|
1,498,025 |
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
1,359,632 |
|
|
|
1,074,258 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(8,159 |
) |
|
|
(31,020 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
2,661,137 |
|
|
|
2,542,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,756,368 |
|
|
$ |
6,992,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
10,822,285 |
|
|
$ |
9,184,616 |
|
|
$ |
8,991,464 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
8,257,756 |
|
|
|
6,808,207 |
|
|
|
6,642,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,564,529 |
|
|
|
2,376,409 |
|
|
|
2,348,691 |
|
Operating costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and distribution
|
|
|
1,512,507 |
|
|
|
1,345,065 |
|
|
|
1,321,763 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
349,683 |
|
|
|
317,342 |
|
|
|
337,496 |
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
6,650 |
|
|
|
4,949 |
|
|
|
7,775 |
|
|
Facility closing and reorganization costs
|
|
|
34,695 |
|
|
|
11,787 |
|
|
|
19,050 |
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
(5,899 |
) |
|
|
(68,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
1,897,636 |
|
|
|
1,610,424 |
|
|
|
1,686,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
666,893 |
|
|
|
765,985 |
|
|
|
662,607 |
|
Other (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
204,770 |
|
|
|
181,134 |
|
|
|
197,685 |
|
|
Financing charges on trust issued preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,164 |
|
|
|
33,578 |
|
|
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
7,899 |
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(2,625 |
) |
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other expense
|
|
|
204,517 |
|
|
|
192,429 |
|
|
|
241,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
462,376 |
|
|
|
573,556 |
|
|
|
420,785 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
177,002 |
|
|
|
217,853 |
|
|
|
152,988 |
|
Minority interest in earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
285,374 |
|
|
|
355,703 |
|
|
|
267,751 |
|
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,231 |
) |
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
879 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
285,374 |
|
|
|
355,703 |
|
|
|
260,399 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84,983 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
|
$ |
175,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
154,635,979 |
|
|
|
145,201,412 |
|
|
|
135,031,274 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
160,704,576 |
|
|
|
160,695,670 |
|
|
|
163,163,904 |
|
Basic earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.05 |
) |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.05 |
) |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
Stockholders | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Paid-In Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Income (Loss) | |
|
Equity | |
|
Income | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except share data) | |
Balance, January 1, 2002
|
|
|
131,809,470 |
|
|
$ |
1,318 |
|
|
$ |
961,266 |
|
|
$ |
543,139 |
|
|
$ |
(29,843 |
) |
|
$ |
1,475,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
5,278,170 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
88,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of Legacy Dean stock option liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
(4,126,200 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(101,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(101,233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,416 |
|
|
$ |
175,416 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (Note 12):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,803 |
) |
|
|
(46,803 |
) |
|
|
(46,803 |
) |
|
Amounts reclassified to income statement related to derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,014 |
|
|
|
24,014 |
|
|
|
24,014 |
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,408 |
|
|
|
8,408 |
|
|
|
8,408 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,481 |
) |
|
|
(11,481 |
) |
|
|
(11,481 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
149,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2002
|
|
|
132,961,440 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
979,113 |
|
|
|
718,555 |
|
|
|
(55,705 |
) |
|
|
1,643,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
5,798,235 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
121,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of trust issued preferred securities
|
|
|
22,901,839 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
582,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
(6,668,300 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(185,437 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(185,504 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
355,703 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (Note 12):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,650 |
) |
|
|
(7,650 |
) |
|
|
(7,650 |
) |
|
Amounts reclassified to income statement related to derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,610 |
|
|
|
25,610 |
|
|
|
25,610 |
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,247 |
|
|
|
18,247 |
|
|
|
18,247 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,522 |
) |
|
|
(11,522 |
) |
|
|
(11,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
380,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
154,993,214 |
|
|
|
1,550 |
|
|
|
1,498,025 |
|
|
|
1,074,258 |
|
|
|
(31,020 |
) |
|
|
2,542,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
3,539,783 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
86,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Horizon Organic stock option conversion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
(9,310,000 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(296,925 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(297,018 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income (Note 12):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(717 |
) |
|
|
(717 |
) |
|
|
(717 |
) |
|
Amounts reclassified to income statement related to derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,723 |
|
|
|
20,723 |
|
|
|
20,723 |
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,313 |
|
|
|
17,313 |
|
|
|
17,313 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,458 |
) |
|
|
(14,458 |
) |
|
|
(14,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
308,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
|
149,222,997 |
|
|
$ |
1,492 |
|
|
$ |
1,308,172 |
|
|
$ |
1,359,632 |
|
|
$ |
(8,159 |
) |
|
$ |
2,661,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
|
$ |
175,416 |
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(879 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
223,547 |
|
|
|
191,885 |
|
|
|
173,994 |
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets
|
|
|
4,552 |
|
|
|
(1,194 |
) |
|
|
4,586 |
|
|
|
Gain on sale of operations
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(66,168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
7,899 |
|
|
|
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,231 |
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,983 |
|
|
|
Write-down of impaired assets
|
|
|
13,099 |
|
|
|
8,757 |
|
|
|
11,253 |
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
143,136 |
|
|
|
143,267 |
|
|
|
75,605 |
|
|
|
Tax savings on equity compensation
|
|
|
18,526 |
|
|
|
26,380 |
|
|
|
13,923 |
|
|
|
Costs related to early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
32,613 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
(8,990 |
) |
|
|
2,839 |
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(83,456 |
) |
|
|
(67,565 |
) |
|
|
99,775 |
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(25,722 |
) |
|
|
(18,718 |
) |
|
|
18,167 |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
20,663 |
|
|
|
(943 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(74,711 |
) |
|
|
(89,367 |
) |
|
|
(51,193 |
) |
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
(9,974 |
) |
|
|
27,893 |
|
|
|
18,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations
|
|
|
527,656 |
|
|
|
522,302 |
|
|
|
642,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
527,656 |
|
|
|
522,302 |
|
|
|
655,764 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(356,136 |
) |
|
|
(291,662 |
) |
|
|
(241,982 |
) |
|
Cash outflows for acquisitions and investments
|
|
|
(401,148 |
) |
|
|
(246,573 |
) |
|
|
(222,149 |
) |
|
Net proceeds from divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,950 |
|
|
|
148,313 |
|
|
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
10,713 |
|
|
|
12,112 |
|
|
|
6,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in continuing operations
|
|
|
(746,571 |
) |
|
|
(436,173 |
) |
|
|
(309,053 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(746,571 |
) |
|
|
(436,173 |
) |
|
|
(314,191 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
|
|
1,658,846 |
|
|
|
349,680 |
|
|
|
637,500 |
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(1,220,629 |
) |
|
|
(322,691 |
) |
|
|
(992,797 |
) |
|
Payments of deferred financing, debt restructuring and merger
costs
|
|
|
(9,801 |
) |
|
|
(5,200 |
) |
|
|
(2,887 |
) |
|
Issuance of common stock, net of expenses
|
|
|
67,946 |
|
|
|
95,270 |
|
|
|
74,988 |
|
|
Redemption of common stock
|
|
|
(297,018 |
) |
|
|
(199,521 |
) |
|
|
(87,211 |
) |
|
Redemption of trust issued preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
199,344 |
|
|
|
(84,882 |
) |
|
|
(370,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(19,571 |
) |
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
|
(28,834 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
47,143 |
|
|
|
45,896 |
|
|
|
74,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
27,572 |
|
|
$ |
47,143 |
|
|
$ |
45,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-7
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
1. |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Nature of Our Business We are a leading food
and beverage company. Our Dairy Group is the largest processor
and distributor of milk and various other dairy products in the
United States. The Dairy Group sells its products under a
variety of local and regional brands. Our WhiteWave Foods
Company (formerly the Branded Products Group) manufacturers,
markets and sells a variety of well-known soy, dairy and
dairy-related nationally branded products including
Silk® soymilk and cultured soy products, Horizon
Organic® fluid dairy, juices and other products,
International Delight® coffee creamers and LAND
OLAKES® fluid dairy products. Our Specialty Foods
Group is the leading private label pickle processor in the
United States and a maker of a variety of other food products.
We also own the fourth largest dairy processor in Spain.
Basis of Presentation Our Consolidated
Financial Statements include the accounts of our wholly owned
subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions are
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates The preparation of our
Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) requires us to
use our judgment to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures
of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of
net sales and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from these estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Cash Equivalents We consider temporary cash
investments with an original maturity of three months or less to
be cash equivalents.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost or market. Dairy and certain specialty products
are valued using the first-in, first-out (FIFO)
method while our pickle inventories are valued using the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. The costs of
finished goods inventories include raw materials, direct labor
and indirect production and overhead costs.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant
and equipment are stated at acquisition cost, plus capitalized
interest on borrowings during the actual construction period of
major capital projects. Also included in property, plant and
equipment are certain direct costs related to the implementation
of computer software for internal use. Depreciation and
amortization are calculated using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows:
|
|
|
Asset |
|
Useful Life |
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
7 to 40 years |
Machinery and equipment
|
|
3 to 20 years |
We perform impairment tests when circumstances indicate that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Capitalized leases are
amortized over the shorter of their lease term or their
estimated useful lives. Expenditures for repairs and
maintenance, which do not improve or extend the life of the
assets, are expensed as incurred.
F-8
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Intangible and Other Assets Identifiable
intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful
lives as follows:
|
|
|
Asset |
|
Useful Life |
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
Straight-line method over 5 to 15 years
|
Customer supply contracts
|
|
Straight-line method over the terms of the agreements
|
Trademarks/trade names
|
|
Straight-line method over 5 to 40 years
|
Noncompetition agreements
|
|
Straight-line method over the terms of the agreements
|
Patents
|
|
Straight-line method over 15 years
|
Deferred financing costs
|
|
Interest method over the terms of the related debt
|
Effective January 1, 2002, in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
goodwill and other intangible assets determined to have
indefinite useful lives are no longer amortized. Instead, we now
conduct impairment tests on our goodwill, trademarks and other
intangible assets with indefinite lives annually and when
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. To determine whether an impairment exists, we use
present value techniques. Upon adoption of
SFAS No. 142, we conducted transitional impairment
tests and recorded certain impairments during 2002. The results
of these tests indicated that the goodwill related to our Puerto
Rico operations was impaired at January 1, 2002. In the
fourth quarter of 2002, we determined that the impairment that
existed as of January 1, 2002 was $37.7 million (net
of tax). As required by SFAS No. 142, we recorded the
impairment in our income statement as the cumulative effect of
accounting change retroactive to the first quarter of 2002. See
Note 2 for information related to the sale of our Puerto
Rico operations. We also completed an impairment assessment of
our intangibles with indefinite useful lives other than
goodwill, upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, during the first
quarter of 2002 as of January 1, 2002. We determined that
an impairment of $47.3 million (net of tax) existed at
January 1, 2002. The impairment related to certain
trademarks in our Dairy Group and WhiteWave Foods Company
segments, and was recorded in the first quarter as the
cumulative effect of an accounting change. The fair value of
these trademarks was determined using a present value technique.
Foreign Currency Translation The financial
statements of our foreign subsidiaries are translated to
U.S. dollars in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation.
The functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is generally
the local currency of the country. Accordingly, assets and
liabilities of the foreign subsidiaries are translated to
U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates. Income and expense
items are translated at the average rates prevailing during the
year. Changes in exchange rates that affect cash flows and the
related receivables or payables are recognized as transaction
gains and losses in the determination of net income. The
cumulative translation adjustment in stockholders equity
reflects the unrealized adjustments resulting from translating
the financial statements of our foreign subsidiaries.
Minority Interest in Subsidiaries Minority
interest in results of operations of consolidated subsidiaries
represents the minority shareholders share of the income
or loss of various consolidated subsidiaries. Equity in
earnings/(losses) represents the proportional share of the
earnings or losses of these subsidiaries less any cash
distributions made. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, there
were no outstanding minority interests.
Stock-Based Compensation We have elected to
follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and
related interpretations in accounting for our stock options. All
options granted to date have been to employees, officers and
directors. No compensation expense has been recognized as the
stock options were granted at exercise prices that were at or
above market value at the grant date. Compensation expense for
grants of stock units (SUs) is recognized over the
vesting period. See Note 11 for more information about our
stock option and SU programs. Had compensation expense been
determined for stock option grants using fair value methods
provided for in SFAS No. 123, Accounting for
F-9
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Stock-Based Compensation, our pro forma net income and net
income per common share would have been the amounts indicated
below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) | |
Net income, as reported
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
|
$ |
175,416 |
|
Add: Stock-based compensation expense included in reported net
income, net of tax
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Stock-based compensation expense determined under fair
value-based methods for all awards, net of tax
|
|
|
(35,281 |
) |
|
|
(36,614 |
) |
|
|
(31,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
253,721 |
|
|
$ |
321,485 |
|
|
$ |
144,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as reported
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
pro forma
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
2.21 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
Diluted as reported
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
pro forma
|
|
|
1.58 |
|
|
|
2.06 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
Stock option share data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options granted during period
|
|
|
2,392,658 |
|
|
|
3,508,667 |
|
|
|
7,711,394 |
|
|
Weighted average option fair value
|
|
$ |
8.87 |
|
|
$ |
11.61 |
|
|
$ |
9.99 |
|
SU data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUs granted during period
|
|
|
475,750 |
|
|
|
806,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average unit fair value
|
|
$ |
31.59 |
|
|
$ |
25.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of each stock option grant is calculated using
the Black-Scholes option pricing model, with the following
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Expected volatility
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
37 to 38% |
|
|
|
38% |
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0% |
|
|
|
0% |
|
Expected option term
|
|
|
5 years |
|
|
|
7 years |
|
|
|
7 years |
|
Risk-free rate of return
|
|
|
2.98 to 3.81% |
|
|
|
3.03 to 4.00% |
|
|
|
4.09 to 4.87% |
|
Sales Recognition and Accounts Receivable
Sales are recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement
exists, the price is fixed or determinable, the product has been
shipped to the customer and there is a reasonable assurance of
collection of the sales proceeds. In accordance with Emerging
Issues Task Force (EITF) 01-09, Accounting for
Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer, sales are
reduced by certain sales incentives, some of which are recorded
by estimating expense based on our historical experience. We
provide credit terms to customers generally ranging up to
30 days, perform ongoing credit evaluation of our customers
and maintain allowances for potential credit losses based on
historical experience. Estimated product returns, which have not
been material, are deducted from sales at the time of shipment.
Income Taxes All of our wholly owned
U.S. operating subsidiaries are included in our
consolidated tax return. In addition, our proportional share of
the operations of our former majority-owned subsidiaries and
certain of our equity method affiliates, all of which are
organized as limited liability companies or limited
partnerships, are included in our consolidated tax return. Our
foreign subsidiaries are required to file separate income tax
returns in their local jurisdictions. Certain distributions from
these subsidiaries are subject to U.S. income taxes;
however, available tax credits of these subsidiaries may reduce
or eliminate these
F-10
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
U.S. income tax liabilities. Other foreign earnings are
expected to be reinvested indefinitely. At December 31,
2004, no provision had been made for U.S. federal or state
income tax on approximately $30.5 million of accumulated
foreign earnings.
Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences
between amounts recorded in the Consolidated Financial
Statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities using current
tax rates. Deferred tax assets, including the benefit of net
operating loss carry-forwards, are evaluated based on the
guidelines for realization and are reduced by a valuation
allowance if deemed necessary.
Advertising Expense Advertising expense is
primarily comprised of media, agency and production expenses.
Advertising expenses are charged to income during the period
incurred, except for expenses related to the development of a
major commercial or media campaign which are charged to income
during the period in which the advertisement or campaign is
first presented by the media. Advertising expenses charged to
income totaled $120 million in 2004, $108.3 million in
2003 and $91.1 million in 2002. Additionally, prepaid
advertising costs were $3.6 million and $368,000 at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Shipping and Handling Fees Our shipping and
handling costs are included in both cost of sales and selling
and distribution expense, depending on the nature of such costs.
Shipping and handling costs included in cost of sales reflect
inventory warehouse costs, product loading and handling costs
and costs associated with transporting finished products from
our manufacturing facilities to our own distribution warehouses.
Shipping and handling costs included in selling and distribution
expense consist primarily of route delivery costs for both
company-owned delivery routes and independent distributor
routes, to the extent that such independent distributors are
paid a delivery fee and the cost of shipping products to
customers through third party carriers. Shipping and handling
costs that were recorded as a component of selling and
distribution expense were approximately $1.13 billion,
$988.1 million and $951.9 million during 2004, 2003
and 2002, respectively.
Insurance Accruals We retain selected levels
of property and casualty risks, primarily related to employee
health care, workers compensation claims and other
casualty losses. Many of these potential losses are covered
under conventional insurance programs with third party carriers
with high deductible limits. In other areas, we are self-insured
with stop-loss coverages. Accrued liabilities for incurred but
not reported losses related to these retained risks are
calculated based upon loss development factors which contemplate
a number of factors including claims history and expected
trends. These loss development factors are developed by us in
consultation with external insurance brokers and actuaries.
Facility Closing and Reorganization Costs We
have an on-going facility closing and reorganization strategy.
We periodically record facility closing and reorganization
charges when we have identified a facility for closure or other
reorganization opportunity, developed a plan and notified the
affected employees. Effective January 1, 2003, we record
these charges in accordance with SFAS No. 146,
Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal
Activities. Facility closings initiated prior to
January 1, 2003 continue to be accounted for under the old
guidance.
Comprehensive Income We consider all changes
in equity from transactions and other events and circumstances,
except those resulting from investments by owners and
distributions to owners, to be comprehensive income.
Stock Split On June 9, 2003, we effected
a three-for-two split of our common stock, and on April 23,
2002, we effected a two-for-one stock split. All share numbers
contained in our Consolidated Financial Statements and in these
Notes have been adjusted for all periods to reflect the stock
splits.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In
December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003),
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefits in an attempt to improve financial
statement disclosures regarding defined
F-11
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
benefit plans. This standard requires that companies provide
more details about their plan assets, benefit obligations, cash
flows, benefit costs and other relevant information. In addition
to expanded annual disclosures, we are required to report the
various elements of pension and other postretirement benefit
costs on a quarterly basis. SFAS No. 132 (revised 2003) is
effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003,
and for quarters beginning after December 15, 2003. The
expanded disclosure requirements are included in this report.
On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug,
Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the Act)
was signed into law. The Act introduces a prescription drug
benefit under Medicare Part D, as well as a federal subsidy
to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a
benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare
Part D. In April 2004, the FASB issued Staff Position
(FSP) No. SFAS 106-2 to address the
accounting and disclosure requirements related to the Act. The
FSP is effective for interim or annual periods beginning after
September 15, 2004. Substantially all of our postretirement
benefits terminate at age 65. Therefore, the FSP will have
no material affect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements The
FASB issued SFAS No.123(R), Share-Based Payment
in December 2004. It will require the cost of employee
compensation paid with equity instruments to be measured based
on grant-date fair values. That cost will be recognized over the
vesting period. SFAS No. 123(R) will become effective
for us in the third quarter 2005. We are still evaluating the
impact of SFAS No. 123(R) on our Consolidated
Financial Statements and have not yet determined the transition
method we will apply when we adopt the statement. Refer to the
section Stock-Based Compensation in this Note for an
illustration of the pro-forma impact of expensing our stock
options in the historical periods.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs an Amendment of ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151, which
is effective for inventory costs incurred during years beginning
after June 15, 2005, clarifies the accounting for abnormal
amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and
wasted material, requiring that those items be recognized as
current-period charges. In addition, SFAS No. 151
requires that allocation of fixed production overheads be based
on the normal capacity of the production facilities. We do not
believe the adoption of this standard will have a material
impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In December 2004, FASB issued SFAS No. 153,
Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets, an amendment of APB
Opinion No. 29. SFAS No. 153 is effective
for nonmonetary exchanges occurring in years beginning after
June 15, 2005. SFAS No. 153 eliminates the rule
in APB No. 29 which excluded from fair value measurement
exchanges of similar productive assets. Instead
SFAS No. 153 excludes from fair value measurement
exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial
substance. We do not believe the adoption of this standard will
have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reclassifications Certain reclassifications
have been made to conform the prior years Consolidated
Financial Statements to the current year classifications.
|
|
2. |
ACQUISITIONS, DIVESTITURES AND DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
We completed the acquisitions of 24 businesses during 2004, 2003
and 2002. All of these acquisitions were funded with cash flows
from operations and borrowings under our credit facility and our
accounts receivables-backed facility.
F-12
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
All acquisitions were accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting as of their respective acquisition dates, and
accordingly, only the results of operations of the acquired
companies subsequent to their respective acquisition dates are
included in our Consolidated Financial Statements. At the
acquisition date, the purchase price was allocated to assets
acquired, including identifiable intangibles, and liabilities
assumed based on their fair market values. The excess of the
total purchase prices over the fair values of the net assets
acquired represented goodwill. In connection with the
acquisitions, assets were acquired and liabilities were assumed
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Purchase prices:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid, net of cash acquired
|
|
$ |
401,148 |
|
|
$ |
246,573 |
|
|
$ |
206,307 |
(1) |
|
Cash acquired in acquisitions
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
17,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase prices
|
|
|
403,687 |
|
|
|
246,744 |
|
|
|
224,177 |
|
Fair value of net assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired
|
|
|
260,723 |
|
|
|
102,709 |
|
|
|
147,650 |
|
|
Liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(163,270 |
) |
|
|
(28,771 |
) |
|
|
(29,172 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of net assets acquired
|
|
|
97,453 |
|
|
|
73,938 |
|
|
|
118,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$ |
306,234 |
|
|
$ |
172,806 |
|
|
$ |
105,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
An additional $15.8 million was paid as part of the
acquisition of the former Dean Foods Company (Legacy
Dean). |
We have not completed the final allocation of purchase price to
the fair values of assets and liabilities acquired in 2004, or
the related business integration plans. We expect that the
ultimate purchase price allocation may include additional
adjustments to the fair values of depreciable tangible assets,
identifiable intangible assets and the carrying values of
certain liabilities. Accordingly, to the extent that such
assessments indicate the fair value of the assets and
liabilities differ from their preliminary purchase price
allocation, such difference would adjust the amounts allocated
to the assets and liabilities and would change the amounts
allocated to goodwill.
Milk Products of Alabama On October 15,
2004 our Dairy Group acquired Milk Products of Alabama, a dairy
manufacturer based in Decatur, Alabama. Milk Products of Alabama
had net sales of approximately $34 million in 2003. As a
result of this acquisition, we have expanded our production
capabilities in the southeastern United States, allowing us to
better serve our customers. Milk Products of Alabamas
results of operations are now included in the Morningstar
division of our Dairy Group. We paid approximately
$23.2 million for the purchase of Milk Products of Alabama,
including costs of acquisition, and funded the purchase price
with borrowings under our senior credit facility.
Tiger Foods On May 31, 2004, Leche
Celta, our Spanish subsidiary, acquired Tiger Foods, a dairy
processing business with one facility located in Avila, Spain.
Tiger Foods, which had net sales of approximately
$29 million in 2003, manufactures and distributes branded
and private label UHT milk and dairy-based drinks throughout
Spain, with an emphasis in the southern and central regions.
Tiger Foods operations complement our Spanish operations
and we expect this acquisition to allow us to reduce our
transportation costs for raw milk and finished products due to
their geographic proximity to our raw milk suppliers and certain
customers. We paid approximately $21.9 million for the
purchase of the company, all of which was funded with borrowings
under our senior credit facility.
F-13
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Soy Processing Facility On April 5,
2004, our WhiteWave Foods Company acquired a soy processing and
packaging plant located in Bridgeton, New Jersey. Prior to the
acquisition, the previous owner of the facility co-packed
Silk products for us at the facility. As a result of the
acquisition, we have increased our in-house processing and
packaging capabilities for our soy products, resulting in cost
reductions. We paid approximately $25.7 million for the
purchase of the facility, all of which was funded using
borrowings under our senior credit facility.
LAND OLAKES East In 2002, we purchased
a perpetual license to use the LAND OLAKES®
brand on certain dairy products nationally, excluding cheese and
butter. This perpetual license was subject, however, to a
pre-existing sublicense entitling a competitor to manufacture
and sell cream, sour cream and whipping cream in certain
channels in the eastern United States. Effective March 31,
2004, WhiteWave Foods Company acquired that sublicense and
certain customer relationships of the sublicensee (LAND
OLAKES East) for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $17 million, all of which was funded using
borrowings under our senior credit facility. We now have the
exclusive right to use the LAND OLAKES brand on
certain dairy products (other than cheese and butter) throughout
the entire United States.
Ross Swiss Dairies On January 26, 2004,
our Dairy Group acquired Ross Swiss Dairies, a dairy distributor
based in Los Angeles, California, which had net sales of
approximately $120 million in 2003. As a result of this
acquisition, we have increased the distribution capability of
our Dairy Group in southern California, allowing us to better
serve our customers. Ross Swiss Dairies has historically
purchased a significant portion of its products from other
processors. Now the majority of products distributed by Ross
Swiss Dairies are manufactured in our southern California
facilities. We paid approximately $21.8 million, including
transaction costs, for the purchase of Ross Swiss Dairies and
funded the purchase price with borrowings under our
receivables-backed facility.
Horizon Organic On January 2, 2004, we
completed the acquisition of the 87% of Horizon Organic Holding
Corporation (Horizon Organic) that we did not
already own. Horizon Organic had sales of over $200 million
during 2003. We already owned approximately 13% of the
outstanding common stock of Horizon Organic as a result of
investments made in 1998. Third-party co-packers, including us,
have historically done all of Horizon Organics
manufacturing. During 2003, we produced approximately 27% of
Horizon Organics fluid dairy products. We also distributed
Horizon Organics products in several parts of the country.
Horizon Organic is a leading branded organic foods company in
the United States. Because organic foods are gaining popularity
with consumers and because Horizon Organics products offer
consumers an alternative to our Dairy Groups traditional
dairy products, we believe Horizon Organic is an important
addition to our portfolio of brands. The aggregate purchase
price for the 87% of Horizon Organic that we did not already own
was approximately $287 million, including approximately
$217 million of cash paid to Horizon Organics
stockholders, the repayment of approximately $40 million of
borrowings under Horizon Organics former credit
facilities, and transaction expenses of approximately
$9 million, all of which was funded using borrowings under
our senior credit facility and our receivables-backed facility.
In addition, each of the options to purchase Horizon
Organics common stock outstanding on January 2, 2004
was converted into an option to purchase .7301 shares of
our stock, with an aggregate fair value of approximately
$21 million. Beginning with the first quarter of 2004,
Horizon Organics financial results are reported in our
WhiteWave Foods Company segment.
Other During 2004, our Dairy Group and
Specialty Foods Group completed several smaller acquisitions for
an aggregate purchase price of $23.3 million and
$1.1 million, respectively.
Cremora On December 24, 2003, our
Specialty Foods Group acquired the Cremora® branded
non-dairy powdered creamer business from Eagle Family Foods.
Prior to the acquisition, we had been producing Cremora
creamers for Eagle Family Foods pursuant to a co-packing
arrangement, which generated
F-14
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
approximately $8.9 million of net sales for us in 2003.
Cremora is the first branded powdered coffee creamer
offering for Specialty Foods. The Cremora brand had sales
of approximately $15.8 million in the twelve months ended
June 30, 2003. We purchased the Cremora business for
a purchase price of approximately $12.6 million, all of
which was funded using borrowings under our senior credit
facility.
Kohler Mix On October 15, 2003, we
acquired Kohler Mix Specialties, Inc., the dairy products
division of Michael Foods, Inc. Kohlers product line
consists primarily of private label ultra-pasteurized ice cream
mixes, creamers and creams, sold primarily in the foodservice
channel. Kohler is included in the Morningstar division of our
Dairy Group segment. The acquisition of Kohler increased the
Dairy Groups ultra-high temperature processing capacity,
which we needed to meet the expanding needs of our WhiteWave
Foods Company segment. Kohler had net sales of approximately
$187.5 million for the 12 months ended August 31,
2003 and has three facilities located in White Bear Lake,
Minnesota, Sulphur Springs, Texas and Newington, Connecticut. We
paid approximately $158.6 million for the purchase of
Kohler, all of which was funded using borrowings under our
receivables-backed facility.
Melody Farms On June 9, 2003, our Dairy
Group acquired Melody Farms, LLC. Melody Farms, which is now a
part of the Midwest region of our Dairy Group, is a regional
dairy processor based in Livonia, Michigan, that produces fluid
dairy and ice cream products from two facilities in Michigan.
Our acquisition of Melody Farms expanded our distribution reach
and allows us to better serve our customers in the Michigan
area. Melody Farms had net sales of approximately
$116 million during the 12 months ended March 31,
2003. We paid approximately $52.7 million for Melody Farms,
all of which was funded using borrowings under our
receivables-backed facility.
Other During 2003, our Dairy Group completed
several small acquisitions for an aggregate purchase price of
$22.6 million.
Maries On May 17, 2002, we bought
the assets of Maries Quality Foods, Maries
Dressings, Inc. and Maries Associates, makers of
Maries® brand dips and dressings in the
western United States, for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $23.5 million. Prior to the acquisition, we
licensed the Maries brand to Maries Quality
Foods and Maries Dressings, Inc. for use in connection
with the manufacture and sale of dips and dressings in the
western United States. As a result of this acquisition, our
WhiteWave Foods Company segment is now the sole owner,
manufacturer and marketer of Maries brand products
nationwide.
White Wave, Inc. (White Wave) On May 9,
2002, we acquired the 64% equity interest in White Wave that we
did not already own. White Wave, based in Boulder, Colorado, is
the maker of Silk soymilk and other soy-based products,
and had sales of approximately $125 million during the
12 months ended March 31, 2002. Prior to May 9,
2002, we owned approximately 36% of White Wave, as a result of
certain investments made by Legacy Dean beginning in 1999. We
decided to purchase the remaining 64% equity interest, for a
total price of approximately $192.8 million because of the
success that Silk had experienced in the refrigerated
soymilk category and we believed it was important that we have a
successful branded soymilk offering in order to better serve our
customers and consumers.
Other In 2002 our Dairy Group made two
smaller acquisitions for an aggregate purchase price of
$8 million.
In order to more closely align both our assets and our
management resources with our strategic direction, part of our
strategy is to divest certain non-core assets. On July 31,
2003, we completed the sale of our frozen pre-whipped topping
and frozen coffee creamer operations. We recorded a pre-tax gain
on the sale of approximately $66.2 million. Also in July
2003, we sold certain Dairy Group delivery trucks and customer
F-15
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
relationships in New York. The proceeds from the sale of
businesses during 2003 were approximately $90 million.
During 2002, we completed the sale of the following non-core
businesses acquired as part of Legacy Deans Specialty
Foods division: on January 4, 2002, we completed the sale
of the stock of DFC Transportation Company, a contract hauler;
on February 7, 2002, we completed the sale of the assets
related to a boiled peanut business; and on October 11,
2002, we completed the sale of EBI Foods Limited, a U.K.-based
manufacturer of powdered food coatings. Net proceeds from the
sale of these three businesses totaled approximately
$28.9 million. No gain or loss was recorded on the
divestiture of Legacy Deans businesses during 2002 because
the sales prices equaled the carrying values.
On December 30, 2002, we sold our operations in Puerto Rico
for a net price of approximately $119.4 million. Our
financial statements were restated in 2002 to reflect our former
Puerto Rico business as a discontinued operation.
Net sales and income before taxes generated by our Puerto Rico
operations were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
2002(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
221,908 |
|
Income before tax(2)
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
(1) |
All intercompany sales and expenses have been appropriately
eliminated in the table. |
|
(2) |
Corporate interest expense of $5.5 million in 2002 was
allocated to our Puerto Rico operations based on the ratio of
our investment in Puerto Rico to total debt and equity. |
In the first quarter of 2002, we recognized an impairment charge
of $37.7 million related to the goodwill of our Puerto Rico
operations in accordance with our implementation of
SFAS No. 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. This loss is reflected as a cumulative change in
accounting principle in our Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
3. |
INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES |
Investment in Consolidated Container Company
We own an approximately 27% minority interest, on a fully
diluted basis, in Consolidated Container Company
(CCC), one of the nations largest
manufacturers of rigid plastic containers and our largest
supplier of plastic bottles and bottle components. We have owned
our minority interest since July 2, 1999 when we sold our
U.S. plastic packaging operations to CCC.
Since July 2, 1999, our investment in CCC has been
accounted for under the equity method of accounting. During
2001, due to a variety of operational difficulties, CCC
consistently reported operating results that were significantly
weaker than expected, which resulted in significant losses in
the third and fourth quarters of 2001. As a result, by late 2001
CCC had become unable to comply with the financial covenants
contained in its credit facility. We concluded that our
investment was impaired and that the impairment was not
temporary so we wrote off our remaining investment during the
fourth quarter of 2001.
In February 2002, CCCs lenders agreed to restructure
CCCs credit agreement to modify the financial covenants,
subject to the agreement of CCCs primary shareholders to
guarantee certain of CCCs indebtedness. Because CCC is an
important and valued supplier of ours, and in order to protect
our interest in CCC, we agreed to provide a limited guarantee of
up to $10 million of CCCs revolving credit
indebtedness. By late 2002, CCC was again unable to comply with
the terms of its credit agreement. CCCs lenders agreed to
again restructure CCCs credit agreement, subject to the
agreement of CCCs primary shareholders to
F-16
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
provide a total of $35 million of additional debt financing
to CCC. In the fourth quarter of 2002, we agreed to
loan CCC $10 million of the $35 million in
additional financing, in exchange for cancellation of our
pre-existing $10 million guaranty and the receipt of
additional equity. Vestar Capital Partners, majority owner of
CCC, loaned CCC the remaining $25 million. Our loan to CCC
is due on December 31, 2007 (or upon the earlier payment in
full of CCCs senior debt) and is secured by a subordinate
lien on certain of CCCs assets. The loan is not scheduled
to be repaid until after CCCs senior debt has been paid.
Therefore, our right to enforce payment of the loan is limited
prior to payment in full of CCCs senior debt. The loan
bears interest at the prime rate plus 2.25%, or the eurodollar
rate plus 3.25%, at CCCs option. Upon maturity of the
loan, we will be entitled to receive a $400,000 fee, plus an
additional fee in respect of the unpaid principal amount of the
loan from January 10, 2003 to the maturity date of the
loan, computed at an annual rate of 11.3%. Under GAAP, we were
required to recognize a portion of CCCs 2002 losses, up to
the amount of the loan. The loan was written off in its entirety
in the fourth quarter of 2002. Our investment in CCC was
recorded at $0 at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Less than 1% of CCC is owned indirectly by Alan Bernon, a member
of our Board of Directors, and his brother Peter Bernon.
Pursuant to our agreements with Vestar, we control two of the
seven seats on CCCs Management Committee. We have
long-term supply agreements with CCC to purchase certain of our
requirements for plastic bottles and bottle components from CCC.
We spent approximately $235.5 million, $167.9 million
and $128.7 million on products purchased from CCC for the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
In the fourth quarter of 2004, we purchased equipment previously
owned and operated by CCC totaling $3.2 million.
Investment in Horizon Organic At
December 31, 2003, we had an approximately 13% interest in
Horizon Organic. We accounted for this investment under the
equity method of accounting. On January 2, 2004, we
acquired the 87% of Horizon Organic that we did not already own
and began consolidating Horizon Organics results with our
financial results. Our investment in Horizon Organic at
December 31, 2003 was recorded at $16.6 million, and
our equity in earnings included in our consolidated statement of
income for 2003 and 2002 was income of $244,000 and a loss of
$69,000, respectively.
Investment in Momentx As of December 31,
2004 and 2003, we had an approximately 16% interest in Momentx,
Inc. Our investment in Momentx at both December 31, 2004
and 2003 was $1.2 million. Momentx is the owner and
operator of dairy.com, an online vertical exchange
dedicated to the dairy industry. We account for this investment
under the cost method of accounting. We spent approximately
$664,000, $636,000 and $147,000 on products purchased from
dairy.com for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
$ |
192,796 |
|
|
$ |
165,206 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
287,185 |
|
|
|
261,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
479,981 |
|
|
$ |
426,478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $88.2 million and $97.6 million of our
inventory was accounted for under the LIFO method of accounting
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Our LIFO
reserve was $4 million and $1.4 million at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
F-17
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5. |
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Land
|
|
$ |
165,531 |
|
|
$ |
153,257 |
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
728,278 |
|
|
|
642,468 |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
1,858,879 |
|
|
|
1,616,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,752,688 |
|
|
|
2,411,825 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(805,696 |
) |
|
|
(638,270 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,946,992 |
|
|
$ |
1,773,555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For both 2004 and 2003, we capitalized $3.4 million in
interest related to borrowings during the actual construction
period of major capital projects, which is included as part of
the cost of the related asset.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WhiteWave | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foods | |
|
Specialty | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dairy Group | |
|
Company | |
|
Foods Group | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
2,264,093 |
|
|
$ |
395,948 |
|
|
$ |
304,290 |
|
|
$ |
71,086 |
|
|
$ |
3,035,417 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(19,035 |
) |
|
|
(5,679 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,714 |
) |
Acquisitions
|
|
|
165,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,806 |
|
Currency changes and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,039 |
|
|
|
14,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
2,410,364 |
|
|
|
390,269 |
|
|
|
311,790 |
|
|
|
85,125 |
|
|
|
3,197,548 |
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
|
|
|
(16,788 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(5,317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,128 |
) |
Acquisitions
|
|
|
49,392 |
|
|
|
244,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,406 |
|
|
|
306,234 |
|
Currency changes and other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
8,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
2,442,968 |
|
|
$ |
634,682 |
|
|
$ |
306,473 |
|
|
$ |
106,006 |
|
|
$ |
3,490,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of our
intangible assets other than goodwill as of December 31,
2004 and 2003 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
Gross | |
|
|
|
Net | |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Intangible assets with indefinite lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
$ |
583,402 |
|
|
$ |
(14,274 |
) |
|
$ |
569,128 |
|
|
$ |
485,358 |
|
|
$ |
(14,274 |
) |
|
$ |
471,084 |
|
Intangible assets with finite lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer-related
|
|
|
98,842 |
|
|
|
(18,886 |
) |
|
|
79,956 |
|
|
|
50,850 |
|
|
|
(12,187 |
) |
|
|
38,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other intangibles
|
|
$ |
682,244 |
|
|
$ |
(33,160 |
) |
|
$ |
649,084 |
|
|
$ |
536,208 |
|
|
$ |
(26,461 |
) |
|
$ |
509,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the fourth quarter of 2004, we substantially completed the
purchase price allocation related to our acquisition of Horizon
Organic, and the preliminary amounts initially allocated to
trademarks and customer related intangible assets were adjusted
accordingly. In addition, goodwill was adjusted for changes in
estimated exit costs under contractual obligations entered into
by Horizon Organic prior to our acquisition of them in January
2004.
Amortization expense on intangible assets for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $6.9 million,
$5.5 million and $7.8 million, respectively. Estimated
aggregate intangible asset amortization expense for the next
five years is as follows:
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$8.3 million |
2006
|
|
8.1 million |
2007
|
|
7.9 million |
2008
|
|
7.8 million |
2009
|
|
7.6 million |
Our goodwill and intangible assets have resulted primarily from
acquisitions. Upon acquisition, the purchase price is first
allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities, including
trademarks and customer-related intangible assets, with any
remaining purchase price recorded as goodwill. Goodwill and
trademarks with indefinite lives are not amortized.
A trademark is recorded with an indefinite life if it has
sufficient market share and a history of strong sales and cash
flow performance that we expect to continue for the foreseeable
future. If these perpetual trademark criteria are not met, the
trademarks are amortized over their expected useful lives, which
range from five to 40 years. Determining the expected life
of a trademark is based on a number of factors including the
competitive environment, market share, trademark history and
anticipated future trademark support.
In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we conduct impairment
tests of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives
annually in the fourth quarter or when circumstances arise that
indicate a possible impairment might exist. If the fair value of
an evaluated asset is less than its book value, the asset is
written down to fair value based on its discounted future cash
flows. Our 2004 annual impairment tests of both goodwill and
intangibles with indefinite lives indicated no impairments. Our
annual impairment test of goodwill conducted
F-19
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
in the fourth quarter of 2003 indicated no impairment of
goodwill; as a result of the tests on intangibles with
indefinite lives an impairment of $2.3 million was recorded
for a trademark that we were no longer using.
Amortizable intangible assets are only evaluated for impairment
upon a significant change in the operating environment. If an
evaluation of the undiscounted cash flows indicates impairment,
the asset is written down to its estimated fair value, which is
based on discounted future cash flows.
|
|
7. |
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
577,629 |
|
|
$ |
517,852 |
|
Payroll and benefits
|
|
|
120,485 |
|
|
|
161,700 |
|
Health insurance, workers compensation and other insurance
costs
|
|
|
62,705 |
|
|
|
51,720 |
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
164,380 |
|
|
|
193,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
925,199 |
|
|
$ |
924,707 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the 2004, 2003 and 2002 provisions
for income taxes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Current taxes payable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
23,590 |
|
|
$ |
55,652 |
|
|
$ |
47,618 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
5,066 |
|
|
|
14,533 |
|
|
|
7,829 |
|
|
Foreign and other
|
|
|
2,925 |
|
|
|
4,401 |
|
|
|
3,238 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
145,421 |
|
|
|
143,267 |
|
|
|
94,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
177,002 |
|
|
$ |
217,853 |
|
|
$ |
152,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Excludes an $883,000 income tax expense related to discontinued
operations and a $29 million income benefit related to a
cumulative effect of accounting change. |
The following is a reconciliation of income taxes computed at
the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to the income taxes
reported in the consolidated statements of income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Tax expense at statutory rates
|
|
$ |
161,832 |
|
|
$ |
200,746 |
|
|
$ |
147,274 |
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
11,383 |
|
|
|
11,732 |
|
|
|
16,320 |
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
1,208 |
|
|
|
7,493 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
Favorable tax settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,076 |
) |
Other
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
|
|
(2,118 |
) |
|
|
(5,057 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
177,002 |
|
|
$ |
217,853 |
|
|
$ |
152,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The tax effects of temporary differences giving rise to deferred
income tax assets and liabilities were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carry-forwards
|
|
$ |
14,430 |
|
|
$ |
11,402 |
|
|
Asset valuation reserves
|
|
|
13,568 |
|
|
|
17,096 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
189,971 |
|
|
|
157,268 |
|
|
State and foreign tax credits
|
|
|
9,670 |
|
|
|
8,389 |
|
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
13,593 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(8,034 |
) |
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
(14,765 |
) |
|
|
(13,557 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,338 |
|
|
|
195,595 |
|
Deferred income tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(564,615 |
) |
|
|
(428,624 |
) |
|
Basis differences in unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(23,814 |
) |
|
|
(18,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(588,429 |
) |
|
|
(446,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred income tax liability
|
|
$ |
(381,091 |
) |
|
$ |
(251,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These net deferred income tax assets (liabilities) are
classified in our consolidated balance sheets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Current assets
|
|
$ |
150,151 |
|
|
$ |
137,055 |
|
Noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
(531,242 |
) |
|
|
(388,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
(381,091 |
) |
|
$ |
(251,096 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, we had approximately
$4.4 million of federal tax credits available for carryover
to future years. The losses are subject to certain limitations
and will expire beginning in 2010.
A valuation allowance of $14.8 million has been established
because we believe it is more likely than not that all of the
deferred tax assets relating to state net operating loss and
credit carryovers, foreign tax credit carryovers and capital
loss carryovers will not be realized prior to the date they are
scheduled to expire.
F-21
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Interest | |
|
Amount | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
Outstanding | |
|
Rate | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Rate | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
Senior credit facility
|
|
$ |
2,031,100 |
|
|
|
3.72 |
% |
|
$ |
1,784,053 |
|
|
|
3.05 |
% |
Subsidiary debt obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
|
664,696 |
|
|
|
6.625-8.15 |
|
|
|
660,663 |
|
|
|
6.625-8.15 |
|
|
Receivables-backed facility
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
2.83 |
|
|
|
302,500 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
Other lines of credit
|
|
|
30,750 |
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
6,401 |
|
|
|
2.76 |
|
|
Industrial development revenue bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,700 |
|
|
|
1.35-1.40 |
|
|
Capital lease obligations and other
|
|
|
30,713 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,257,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,791,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less current portion
|
|
|
(141,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180,158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,116,032 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,611,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The scheduled maturities of long-term debt, at December 31,
2004, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
141,918 |
|
2006
|
|
|
65,786 |
|
2007
|
|
|
978,707 |
|
2008
|
|
|
432,710 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,519,031 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
154,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
3,292,733 |
|
|
Less discounts
|
|
|
(35,474 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total outstanding debt
|
|
$ |
3,257,259 |
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility Our senior credit
facility provides for a $1.5 billion revolving credit
facility and a $1.5 billion term loan. At December 31,
2004 there were outstanding term loan borrowings of
$1.5 billion under the senior credit facility, and
$531.1 million outstanding under the revolving line of
credit. Letters of credit in the aggregate amount of
$129.3 million were issued but undrawn. At
December 31, 2004, approximately $839.6 million was
available for future borrowings under the revolving credit
facility, subject to satisfaction of certain ordinary course
conditions contained in the credit agreement.
Both the revolving credit facility and term loan bear interest,
at our election, at the base rate plus a margin that varies from
0 to 62.5 basis points depending on our credit ratings (as
issued by Standard & Poors and Moodys), or
LIBOR plus a margin that varies from 75 to 187.5 basis
points, depending on our credit ratings (as issued by
Standard & Poors and Moodys). The blended
interest rate in effect on borrowings under the senior credit
facility, including the applicable interest rate margin, was
3.72% at December 31, 2004. However, we had interest rate
swap agreements in place that hedged $775 million of our
borrowings under the senior credit facility at an average rate
of 4.96%, plus the applicable interest rate margin. Interest is
payable quarterly or at the end of the applicable interest
period.
Principal payments are required on the term loan as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
$56.25 million quarterly beginning on December 31,
2006 through September 30, 2008; |
F-22
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
$262.5 million quarterly beginning on December 31,
2008 through June 30, 2009; and |
|
|
|
A final payment of $262.5 million on the maturity date of
August 13, 2009. |
No principal payments are due on the $1.5 billion revolving
credit facility until maturity on August 13, 2009.
The credit agreement also requires mandatory principal
prepayments upon the occurrence of certain asset dispositions or
recovery events.
In consideration for the revolving commitment, we pay a
quarterly commitment fee on unused amounts of the revolving
credit facility that ranges from 25 to 37.5 basis points,
depending on our credit ratings (as issued by
Standard & Poors and Moodys).
The senior credit facility contains various financial and other
restrictive covenants and requires that we maintain certain
financial ratios, including a leverage and interest coverage
ratio. We are currently in compliance with all covenants
contained in our credit agreement.
Our credit agreement permits us to complete acquisitions that
meet the following conditions without obtaining prior approval:
(1) the acquired company is involved in the manufacture,
processing and distribution of food or packaging products or any
other line of business in which we are currently engaged,
(2) the net cash purchase price is not greater than
$500 million, (3) we acquire at least 51% of the
acquired entity, (4) the transaction is approved by the
Board of Directors or shareholders, as appropriate, of the
target and (5) after giving effect to such acquisition on a
pro-forma basis, we are in compliance with all financial
covenants. All other acquisitions must be approved in advance by
the required lenders.
The senior credit facility also contains limitations on liens,
investments and the incurrence of additional indebtedness, and
prohibits certain dispositions of property and restricts certain
payments, including dividends. The senior credit facility is
secured by liens on substantially all of our domestic assets
(including the assets of our subsidiaries, but excluding the
capital stock of Legacy Deans subsidiaries, and the real
property owned by Legacy Dean and its subsidiaries).
The credit agreement contains standard default triggers,
including without limitation: failure to maintain compliance
with the financial and other covenants contained in the credit
agreement, default on certain of our other debt, a change in
control and certain other material adverse changes in our
business. The credit agreement does not contain any default
triggers based on our credit rating.
In August 2004, we amended our senior credit facility to
(1) increase the size of our revolving credit facility from
$1 billion to $1.5 billion, (2) increase the size
of our term loan A from $850 million to
$1.5 billion, (3) eliminate term loans B and C and
(4) modify the interest rate and payment terms. When we
amended our credit facility, we were required to write-off
approximately $32.6 million of deferred financing costs
that were incurred in connection with our credit facility prior
to the amendment. These costs were being amortized over the
previous terms of the revolving credit facility and term loans.
Senior Notes Legacy Dean had certain senior
notes outstanding at the time of the acquisition which remain
outstanding. The notes carry the following interest rates and
maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
$99.3 million ($100 million face value), at 6.75%
interest, maturing in June 2005; |
|
|
|
$250.3 million ($250 million face value), at 8.15%
interest, maturing in 2007; |
|
|
|
$188 million ($200 million face value), at 6.625%
interest, maturing in 2009; and |
|
|
|
$127.1 million ($150 million face value), at 6.9%
interest, maturing in 2017. |
F-23
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The related indentures do not contain financial covenants but
they do contain certain restrictions including a prohibition
against Legacy Dean and its subsidiaries granting liens on
certain of their real property interests and a prohibition
against Legacy Dean granting liens on the stock of its
subsidiaries.
Receivables-Backed Facility We have entered
into a $500 million receivables securitization facility
pursuant to which certain of our subsidiaries sell their
accounts receivable to four wholly-owned special purpose
entities intended to be bankruptcy-remote. The special purpose
entities then transfer the receivables to third party
asset-backed commercial paper conduits sponsored by major
financial institutions. The assets and liabilities of these four
special purpose entities are fully reflected on our balance
sheet, and the securitization is treated as a borrowing for
accounting purposes. During 2004, we made net borrowings of
$197.5 million on this facility leaving an outstanding
balance of $500 million at December 31, 2004. The
receivables-backed facility bears interest at a variable rate
based on the commercial paper yield as defined in the agreement.
The average interest rate on this facility was 2.83% at
December 31, 2004. Our ability to re-borrow under this
facility is subject to a standard borrowing base
formula. At December 31, 2004 there was no remaining
availability under this facility. In January 2005, we amended
our receivables-backed loan to increase the facility to
$600 million. See Note 23.
Other Lines of Credit Leche Celta, our
Spanish subsidiary, is our only subsidiary with its own lines of
credit separate from the credit facility described above. Leche
Celta utilizes local commercial lines of credit and receivables
factoring facility. At December 31, 2004, a total of
$30.75 million was outstanding on these facilities at an
average interest rate of 2.64%.
Industrial Development Revenue Bonds Certain
of our subsidiaries had revenue bonds outstanding in 2003 and
2004. These bonds were secured by irrevocable letters of credit
issued by financial institutions, along with first mortgages on
the related real property and equipment. In December 2003, we
made payments of $9 million, leaving an outstanding balance
of $11.7 million at December 31, 2003. During 2004, we
repaid the remaining principal balance on these bonds.
Capital Lease Obligations and Other Capital
lease obligations and other subsidiary debt includes various
promissory notes for the purchase of property, plant and
equipment and capital lease obligations. The various promissory
notes payable provide for interest at varying rates and are
payable in monthly installments of principal and interest until
maturity, when the remaining principal balances are due. Capital
lease obligations represent machinery and equipment financing
obligations, which are payable in monthly installments of
principal and interest and are collateralized by the related
assets financed.
Letters of Credit At December 31, 2004,
there were $129.3 million of issued but undrawn letters of
credit secured by our senior credit facility. The majority of
these letters of credit were required by various utilities and
government entities for performance and insurance guarantees.
Interest Rate Agreements We have interest
rate swap agreements in place that have been designated as cash
flow hedges against variable interest rate exposure on a portion
of our debt, with the objective of minimizing our interest rate
risk and stabilizing cash flows. These swap agreements provide
hedges for loans under our senior credit facility by limiting or
fixing the LIBOR interest rates specified in the senior credit
facility at the interest rates noted below until the indicated
expiration dates of these interest rate swap agreements.
The following table summarizes our various interest rate
agreements in effect as of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Interest Rates |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
Notional Amounts | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
5.20% to 6.74%
|
|
|
December 2005 |
|
|
$ |
400 |
|
3.65% to 6.78%
|
|
|
December 2006 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
F-24
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes our various interest rate
agreements in effect as of December 31, 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Interest Rates |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
Notional Amounts | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
1.48% to 6.69%
|
|
|
December 2004 |
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
5.20% to 6.74%
|
|
|
December 2005 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
6.78%
|
|
|
December 2006 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
These swaps are required to be recorded as an asset or liability
on our consolidated balance sheet at fair value, with an offset
to other comprehensive income to the extent the hedge is
effective. Derivative gains and losses included in other
comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings as the
underlying transaction occurs. Any ineffectiveness in our hedges
is recorded as an adjustment to interest expense.
As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, our derivative liability
totaled $17.1 million and $48.4 million on our
consolidated balance sheet, respectively. This balance includes
approximately $15 million and $33.6 million recorded
as a component of accounts payable and accrued expenses at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively and
$2.1 million and $14.8 million recorded as a component
of other long-term liabilities at December 31, 2004 and
2003, respectively. There was no hedge ineffectiveness, as
determined in accordance with SFAS No. 133, for the
years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Approximately $20.7 million and $25.6 million of
losses (net of taxes) were reclassified to interest expense from
other comprehensive income during the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We estimate that
approximately $9.8 million of net derivative losses (net of
taxes) included in other comprehensive income will be
reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months. These
losses will partially offset the lower interest payments
recorded on our variable rate debt.
We are exposed to market risk under these arrangements due to
the possibility of interest rates on the credit facilities
falling below the rates on our interest rate swap agreements.
Credit risk under these arrangements is remote because the
counterparties to our interest rate swap agreements are major
financial institutions.
|
|
10. |
MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE TRUST ISSUED PREFERRED SECURITIES |
In three separate transactions during the second quarter of
2003, we called for redemption all of our trust-issued preferred
securities (TIPES). We originally issued
$600 million of TIPES in a private placement in 1998. The
TIPES were convertible at the option of the holders, at any
time, into shares of our common stock and were redeemable, at
our option, at any time at specified premiums. In response to
our three announced redemption transactions, holders of more
than 99% of all outstanding TIPES elected to convert their TIPES
into shares of our common stock rather than receive the cash
redemption price. Accordingly, during the second quarter of
2003, we issued an aggregate total of approximately
23 million shares of common stock to holders of TIPES in
lieu of cash redemption payments, and we paid approximately
$2.4 million in cash to holders who did not elect to
convert. There are no remaining TIPES outstanding.
Our authorized shares of capital stock include 1 million
shares of preferred stock and 500 million shares of common
stock with a par value of $.01 per share.
Stock Award Plans We currently have two stock
award plans with shares remaining available for issuance. These
plans, which are our 1997 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan
and the 1989 Legacy Dean Stock Awards Plan (which we adopted
upon completion of our acquisition of Legacy Dean), provide for
grants of stock options, restricted stock and other stock-based
awards to employees, officers, directors and, in some cases,
consultants, up to a maximum of 37.5 million and
approximately 5.7 million shares, respectively.
F-25
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Options and other stock-based awards vest in accordance with
provisions set forth in the applicable award agreements.
The following table summarizes the status of our stock option
compensation programs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at January 1, 2002
|
|
|
21,095,790 |
|
|
$ |
14.11 |
|
|
Granted(1)
|
|
|
7,711,394 |
|
|
|
20.61 |
|
|
Cancelled(2),(3)
|
|
|
(4,297,922 |
) |
|
|
14.94 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(4,950,732 |
) |
|
|
13.79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
19,558,530 |
|
|
|
16.55 |
|
|
Granted(1)
|
|
|
3,508,667 |
|
|
|
25.08 |
|
|
Cancelled(3)
|
|
|
(1,094,262 |
) |
|
|
20.38 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(5,373,809 |
) |
|
|
15.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
16,599,126 |
|
|
|
18.50 |
|
|
Granted(1)
|
|
|
2,392,658 |
|
|
|
31.37 |
|
|
Options issued to Horizon Organic Option Holders(4)
|
|
|
1,137,308 |
|
|
|
16.37 |
|
|
Cancelled(3)
|
|
|
(208,152 |
) |
|
|
22.56 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(3,073,219 |
) |
|
|
17.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
16,847,721 |
|
|
$ |
20.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
8,997,098 |
|
|
$ |
14.42 |
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
8,333,658 |
|
|
|
15.62 |
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
10,642,287 |
|
|
|
17.16 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Employee options vest as follows: one-third on the first
anniversary of the grant date, one-third on the second
anniversary of the grant date, and one-third on the third
anniversary of the grant date. Options granted to non-employee
directors vest upon grant. On June 30 of each year, each
non-employee director receives an immediately vested option to
purchase 7,500 shares of common stock. |
|
(2) |
The acquisition of Legacy Dean triggered certain change in
control rights contained in the Legacy Dean option
agreements, which consisted of the right to surrender the
options to us, in lieu of exercise, in exchange for cash,
provided the options were surrendered prior to March 21,
2002. Options to purchase approximately 2.4 million shares
were surrendered. |
|
(3) |
Pursuant to the terms of our stock award plans, options that are
cancelled or forfeited become available for future grants. |
|
(4) |
In connection with our acquisition of Horizon Organic in January
2004, all options to purchase Horizon Organic stock outstanding
at the time of the acquisition were converted into options to
purchase our stock, most of which were automatically vested when
we completed the acquisition. |
F-26
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about options
outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
Number | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Number | |
|
Weighted-Average | |
Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Contractual Life | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ 0.53 to $12.48
|
|
|
2,572,671 |
|
|
|
3.71 |
|
|
$ |
10.82 |
|
|
|
2,572,671 |
|
|
$ |
10.83 |
|
$12.85 to $14.38
|
|
|
2,174,323 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
|
|
14.25 |
|
|
|
2,174,323 |
|
|
|
14.25 |
|
$14.53 to $19.98
|
|
|
1,703,941 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
18.14 |
|
|
|
1,703,941 |
|
|
|
18.14 |
|
$20.35 to $20.35
|
|
|
4,654,281 |
|
|
|
7.04 |
|
|
|
20.35 |
|
|
|
2,743,773 |
|
|
|
20.35 |
|
$20.39 to $24.77
|
|
|
601,103 |
|
|
|
6.34 |
|
|
|
23.48 |
|
|
|
522,111 |
|
|
|
23.39 |
|
$24.79 to $24.79
|
|
|
2,644,824 |
|
|
|
8.02 |
|
|
|
24.79 |
|
|
|
705,750 |
|
|
|
24.79 |
|
$24.89 to $31.17
|
|
|
2,234,571 |
|
|
|
9.05 |
|
|
|
31.00 |
|
|
|
34,839 |
|
|
|
28.63 |
|
$31.50 to $37.31
|
|
|
262,007 |
|
|
|
9.16 |
|
|
|
33.83 |
|
|
|
184,879 |
|
|
|
34.21 |
|
During 2004, we issued the following shares of restricted stock,
all of which were granted to independent members of our Board of
Directors as compensation for services rendered as directors
during the immediately preceding quarter. Directors shares
of restricted stock vest one-third on grant, one-third on the
first anniversary of grant and one-third on the second
anniversary of grant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date | |
|
|
|
|
Fair Value | |
Period |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
Per Share | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
First quarter
|
|
|
8,508 |
|
|
$ |
33.40 |
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
7,344 |
|
|
|
37.31 |
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
|
30.20 |
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
7,888 |
|
|
|
33.00 |
|
We also issued SUs to certain key employees and directors during
2004 and 2003. Each SU represents the right to receive one share
of common stock in the future. SUs have no exercise price. Each
employees SU grant vests ratably over five years, subject
to certain accelerated vesting provisions based primarily on our
stock price. SUs granted to non-employee directors vest ratably
over three years. The following table summarized the status of
our SU compensation program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees | |
|
Directors | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUs issued
|
|
|
778,750 |
|
|
|
28,050 |
|
|
|
806,800 |
|
SUs cancelled
|
|
|
(125,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125,250 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
653,500 |
|
|
|
28,050 |
|
|
|
681,550 |
|
|
SUs issued
|
|
|
447,700 |
|
|
|
28,050 |
|
|
|
475,750 |
|
|
Shares issued
|
|
|
(101,402 |
) |
|
|
(5,950 |
) |
|
|
(107,352 |
) |
|
SUs cancelled
|
|
|
(49,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUs outstanding at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
950,500 |
|
|
|
50,150 |
|
|
|
1,000,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value
|
|
$ |
27.73 |
|
|
$ |
34.99 |
|
|
$ |
28.07 |
|
Compensation expense recognized in 2004 (in thousands)
|
|
$ |
5,636 |
|
|
$ |
321 |
|
|
$ |
5,957 |
|
Rights Plan On February 27, 1998, our
Board of Directors declared a dividend of the right to purchase
one half of one common share for each outstanding share of
common stock to the stockholders of record on
F-27
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
March 18, 1998. The rights are not exercisable until ten
days subsequent to the announcement of the acquisition of or
intent to acquire a beneficial ownership of 15% or more in Dean
Foods Company. At such time, each right entitles the registered
holder to purchase from us that number of shares of common stock
at an exercise price of $70.00, with a market value of up to two
times the exercise price. At any time prior to such date, a
required majority may redeem the rights in whole, but not in
part, at a price of $0.01 per right. The rights will expire
on March 18, 2008, unless our Board of Directors extends
the term of, or redeems, the rights.
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings per share
is based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share is
based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding and the effect of all dilutive common stock
equivalents during each period. The following table reconciles
the numerators and denominators used in the computations of both
basic and diluted EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) | |
Basic EPS computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
|
$ |
267,751 |
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares
|
|
|
154,635,979 |
|
|
|
145,201,412 |
|
|
|
135,031,274 |
|
|
|
Basic EPS from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
2.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.98 |
|
Diluted EPS computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
355,703 |
|
|
$ |
267,751 |
|
|
|
|
Net effect on earnings from conversion of mandatorily redeemable
convertible preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,994 |
|
|
|
21,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income applicable to common stock
|
|
$ |
285,374 |
|
|
$ |
364,697 |
|
|
$ |
289,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares basic
|
|
|
154,635,979 |
|
|
|
145,201,412 |
|
|
|
135,031,274 |
|
|
|
|
Stock option conversion(1)
|
|
|
5,125,070 |
|
|
|
5,346,882 |
|
|
|
5,132,746 |
|
|
|
|
SUs
|
|
|
943,527 |
|
|
|
729,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive effect of conversion of mandatorily redeemable
convertible preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,417,721 |
|
|
|
22,999,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares diluted
|
|
|
160,704,576 |
|
|
|
160,695,670 |
|
|
|
163,163,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted EPS from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.77 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Stock option conversion excludes anti-dilutive shares of 49,742,
58,344 and 263,655 at December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. |
Stock Repurchases On September 15, 1998,
our Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of
up to $100 million. On September 28, 1999, the Board
increased the program by $100 million to $200 million
and on November 17, 1999 authorized a further increase to
$300 million. We depleted the $300 million
authorization during the second quarter of 2000, and on
May 19, 2000, the Board increased the program by
$100 million to $400 million. On November 2,
2000, the Board authorized a further increase to
F-28
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
$500 million. On each of January 8, 2003 and
February 12, 2003, the Board authorized additional
increases of $150 million each. On September 7, 2004
the Board authorized an additional increase of $200 million
and on November 2, 2004 the Board authorized an additional
increase of $100 million. Set forth in the chart below is a
summary of the stock we repurchased pursuant to this program
through December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Shares of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
|
Year |
|
Quarter |
|
Repurchased | |
|
Purchase Price | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) | |
1998
|
|
Third |
|
|
3,000,000 |
|
|
$ |
30.4 |
|
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
1,531,200 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
1999
|
|
Second |
|
|
239,100 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
5,551,545 |
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
10,459,524 |
|
|
|
128.4 |
|
2000
|
|
First |
|
|
2,066,400 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
Second |
|
|
2,898,195 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
4,761,000 |
|
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
2001
|
|
First |
|
|
370,002 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
2002
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
4,126,200 |
|
|
|
101.2 |
|
2003
|
|
First |
|
|
4,854,900 |
|
|
|
128.5 |
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
1,453,400 |
|
|
|
47.1 |
|
2004
|
|
First |
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
7,825,000 |
|
|
|
251.9 |
|
|
|
Fourth |
|
|
1,335,000 |
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
51,101,466 |
|
|
$ |
982.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004, $118 million was available
for spending under this program (not including fees and
commissions).
Repurchased shares are treated as effectively retired in the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-29
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
12. |
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
Comprehensive income comprises net income plus all other changes
in equity from non-owner sources. The amount of income tax
(expense) benefit allocated to each component of other
comprehensive income for December 31, 2004 and 2003 are
included below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-Tax | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income | |
|
Tax Benefit | |
|
Net | |
|
|
(Loss) | |
|
(Expense) | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Accumulated other comprehensive income, January 1, 2003
|
|
$ |
(91,684 |
) |
|
$ |
35,979 |
|
|
$ |
(55,705 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
16,210 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
|
|
18,247 |
|
Net change in fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(12,338 |
) |
|
|
4,688 |
|
|
|
(7,650 |
) |
Amounts reclassified to income statement related to derivatives
|
|
|
43,733 |
|
|
|
(18,123 |
) |
|
|
25,610 |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
(18,652 |
) |
|
|
7,130 |
|
|
|
(11,522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
(62,731 |
) |
|
|
31,711 |
|
|
|
(31,020 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
17,313 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,313 |
|
Net change in fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
(1,443 |
) |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
(717 |
) |
Amounts reclassified to income statement related to derivatives
|
|
|
32,754 |
|
|
|
(12,031 |
) |
|
|
20,723 |
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
(23,316 |
) |
|
|
8,858 |
|
|
|
(14,458 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
(37,423 |
) |
|
$ |
29,264 |
|
|
$ |
(8,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. |
EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT AND PROFIT SHARING PLANS |
We sponsor various defined benefit and defined contribution
retirement plans, including various employee savings and profit
sharing plans, and contribute to various multi-employer pension
plans on behalf of our employees. Substantially all full-time
union and non-union employees who have completed one or more
years of service and have met other requirements pursuant to the
plans are eligible to participate in these plans. During 2004,
2003 and 2002, our retirement and profit sharing plan expenses
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Defined benefit plans
|
|
$ |
11,029 |
|
|
$ |
15,312 |
|
|
$ |
9,052 |
|
Defined contribution plans
|
|
|
19,497 |
|
|
|
16,873 |
|
|
|
13,731 |
|
Multi-employer pension and certain union plans
|
|
|
23,777 |
|
|
|
24,358 |
|
|
|
17,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,303 |
|
|
$ |
56,543 |
|
|
$ |
40,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined Benefit Plans The benefits under our
defined benefit plans are based on years of service and employee
compensation. Our funding policy is to contribute annually the
minimum amount required under ERISA regulations.
As of December 31, 2004, the latest measurement date, the
accumulated benefit obligation of the pension plans exceeded the
fair value of plan assets. In accordance with
SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting for
Pensions, we recorded an additional minimum pension
liability of $23.3 million ($14.5 million, net of
tax). The adjustment to the additional minimum pension liability
was included in other accumulated comprehen-
F-30
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
sive loss as a direct charge to stockholders equity. As of
December 31, 2004, the cumulative additional minimum
pension charge included in other accumulated comprehensive loss
was $61.3 million ($38.1 million, net of tax).
The following table sets forth the funded status of our defined
benefit plans and the amounts recognized in our consolidated
balance sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
281,194 |
|
|
$ |
261,367 |
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
2,724 |
|
|
|
2,799 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
17,942 |
|
|
|
17,752 |
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Plan amendments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,510 |
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
30,809 |
|
|
|
18,521 |
|
|
Effect of settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(29,370 |
) |
|
|
(28,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
303,432 |
|
|
|
281,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
|
151,598 |
|
|
|
124,759 |
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
14,812 |
|
|
|
24,952 |
|
|
Employer contribution
|
|
|
43,831 |
|
|
|
31,171 |
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
Effect of settlement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,132 |
) |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(29,370 |
) |
|
|
(28,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
181,004 |
|
|
|
151,598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(122,428 |
) |
|
|
(129,596 |
) |
|
Unrecognized net transition obligation
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
10,317 |
|
|
|
11,025 |
|
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
69,733 |
|
|
|
43,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$ |
(41,486 |
) |
|
$ |
(73,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position
consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
$ |
(114,386 |
) |
|
$ |
(124,307 |
) |
|
Intangible asset
|
|
|
11,638 |
|
|
|
12,530 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
61,262 |
|
|
|
37,946 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$ |
(41,486 |
) |
|
$ |
(73,831 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of our key actuarial assumptions used to determine
benefit obligations as of December 31, 2004 and 2003
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.00 to 6.50 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
A summary of our key actuarial assumptions used to determine net
periodic benefit cost for 2004, 2003 and 2002 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00 to 6.50 |
% |
|
|
6.50 to 6.75 |
% |
|
|
7.25 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.50 |
% |
|
|
6.75 to 8.50 |
% |
|
|
6.75 to 9.00 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
4.00 |
% |
|
|
0-5.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Components of net periodic pension cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$ |
2,724 |
|
|
$ |
2,799 |
|
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
17,942 |
|
|
|
17,752 |
|
|
|
18,954 |
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(13,994 |
) |
|
|
(10,430 |
) |
|
|
(15,142 |
) |
Amortizations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized transition obligation
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
708 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
1,665 |
|
|
|
1,833 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
Effect of settlement
|
|
|
1,877 |
|
|
|
2,543 |
|
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
11,029 |
|
|
$ |
15,312 |
|
|
$ |
9,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit
obligation, and fair value of plan assets for the pension plans
with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets
were $303.4 million, $293.6 million and
$181 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2004
and $281.2 million, $275.6 million and
$151.6 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2003.
Included in the above pension benefit tables is an unfunded
supplemental retirement plan with a liability of
$2.2 million and $5.8 million at December 31,
2004 and 2003, respectively.
In 2004, we consolidated substantially all of our qualified
pension plans into one master trust. We retained investment
consultants to assist our Investment Committee with the
transition of the plans assets to the master trust and to
help our Investment Committee formulate a long-term investment
policy for the newly established master trust. Our current asset
mix guidelines under the investment policy target equities at
65% to 75% of the portfolio and fixed income at 25% to 35%.
We determine our expected long-term rate of return based on our
expectations of future returns for the pension plans
investments based on target allocations of the pension
plans investments. Additionally, we consider the
weighted-average return of a capital markets model that was
developed by the plans investment consultants and
historical returns on comparable equity, debt and other
investments. The resulting weighted average expected long-term
rate of return on plan assets is 8.5%.
F-32
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Our pension plan weighted average asset allocations at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 by asset category were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Category |
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Equity securities and limited partnerships
|
|
|
74 |
% |
|
|
65 |
% |
Fixed income securities
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Cash
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities of the plan did not include any investment in
our common stock at December 31, 2004 or 2003.
We expect to contribute $33.7 million to the pension plans
for 2005. Estimated pension plan benefit payments for the next
ten years are as follows:
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ 9.5 million |
2006
|
|
9.4 million |
2007
|
|
10.1 million |
2008
|
|
9.9 million |
2009
|
|
10.1 million |
Next five years
|
|
52.6 million |
Defined Contribution Plans Certain of our
non-union personnel may elect to participate in savings and
profit sharing plans sponsored by us. These plans generally
provide for salary reduction contributions to the plans on
behalf of the participants of between 1% and 20% of a
participants annual compensation and provide for employer
matching and profit sharing contributions as determined by our
Board of Directors. In addition, certain union hourly employees
are participants in company-sponsored defined contribution
plans, which provide for employer contributions in various
amounts ranging from $21 to $39 per pay period per
participant.
Multi-Employer Pension and Certain Union
Plans Certain of our subsidiaries contribute to
various multi-employer pension and certain union plans, which
are administered jointly by management and union representatives
and cover substantially all full-time and certain part-time
union employees who are not covered by our other plans. The
Multi-Employer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980 amended ERISA
to establish funding requirements and obligations for employers
participating in multi-employer plans, principally related to
employer withdrawal from or termination of such plans. We could,
under certain circumstances, be liable for unfunded vested
benefits or other expenses of jointly administered
union/management plans. At this time, we have not established
any significant liabilities because withdrawal from these plans
is not probable or reasonably possible.
|
|
14. |
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS OTHER THAN PENSIONS |
Certain of our subsidiaries provide health care benefits to
certain retirees who are covered under specific group contracts.
As defined by the specific group contract, qualified covered
associates may be eligible to receive major medical insurance
with deductible and co-insurance provisions subject to certain
lifetime maximums.
F-33
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the funded status of these plans
and the amounts recognized in our consolidated balance sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
22,646 |
|
|
$ |
22,198 |
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
1,217 |
|
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
|
|
598 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(2,799 |
) |
|
|
(2,536 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
24,136 |
|
|
|
22,646 |
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(24,136 |
) |
|
|
(22,646 |
) |
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
(2,552 |
) |
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
6,288 |
|
|
|
6,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$ |
(18,498 |
) |
|
$ |
(18,774 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of our key actuarial assumptions used to determine the
benefit obligation as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Healthcare inflation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial rate
|
|
|
10.00 |
% |
|
|
12.00 |
% |
|
Ultimate rate
|
|
|
5.00 to 5.50 |
% |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
Year of ultimate rate achievement
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.00 to 6.50 |
% |
The weighted average discount rate used to determine net
periodic benefit cost was 6.0% to 6.5%, 6.5% to 6.75% and 7.25%
for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and interest cost
|
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
|
$ |
2,386 |
|
|
$ |
2,178 |
|
Amortizations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
2,576 |
|
|
$ |
2,409 |
|
|
$ |
2,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect
on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one percent
change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the
following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-Percentage- | |
|
1-Percentage- | |
|
|
Point Increase | |
|
Point Decrease | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Effect on total of service and interest cost components
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
Effect on postretirement obligation
|
|
|
2,057 |
|
|
|
(1,810 |
) |
We expect to contribute $1.8 million to the postretirement
health care plans for 2005. Estimated postretirement health care
plan benefit payments for the next ten years are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
1.8 million |
|
2006
|
|
|
2.0 million |
|
2007
|
|
|
2.1 million |
|
2008
|
|
|
2.3 million |
|
2009
|
|
|
2.4 million |
|
Next five years
|
|
|
11.9 million |
|
|
|
15. |
FACILITY CLOSING AND REORGANIZATION COSTS |
Facility Closing and Reorganization Costs We
recorded net facility closing and reorganization costs of
$34.7 million, $11.8 million and $19.1 million
during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The charges recorded during 2004 are primarily related to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Exiting the nutritional beverages business operated by our
Specialty Foods Group segment, including the closure of a
manufacturing facility in Benton Harbor, Michigan; |
|
|
|
Closing Dairy Group manufacturing facilities in Madison,
Wisconsin; San Leandro and South Gate, California;
Westwego, Louisiana; Pocatello, Idaho and Wilkesboro, North
Carolina; |
|
|
|
Reorganizing our WhiteWave Foods Company including consolidating
the operations of the three distinct operating units: White
Wave, Horizon Organic, and Dean National Brand Group; and |
|
|
|
Transferring Morningstar Foods private label and
manufacturing operations to the Dairy Group. |
The charges recorded during 2003 are primarily related to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Closing of Dairy Group manufacturing/distribution facilities in
Honolulu, Hawaii; South Gate, California; Jamaica, New York; and
Akron, Ohio; |
|
|
|
Elimination of certain administrative functions at the Midwest
and Northeast regions of our Dairy Group; and |
|
|
|
Realignment of Morningstar Foods private label business
and manufacturing operations into the Dairy Group. |
These charges were accounted for in accordance with
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated
with Exit or Disposal Activities, which became effective
for us in January 2003. We expect to incur additional charges
related to these restructuring plans of approximately
$7.1 million, including an additional $520,000 in work
force reduction costs and approximately $6.6 million in
shut down and other costs. Approximately $5.9 million and
$1 million of these additional charges are expected to be
completed by December 2005 and December 2006, respectively.
F-35
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The charges recorded during 2002 are related to the closing of
Dairy Group facilities in Bennington, Vermont and Toledo, Ohio,
a Dairy Group distribution facility in Winchester, Virginia, and
one Morningstar Foods facility in Tempe, Arizona. The charges
also reflect additional costs related to severance on the
closing of our Dairy Group facility in Port Huron, Michigan in
2001, the shutdown of an ice cream production line at our
Englewood, Colorado facility and the closing of a Dairy Group
facilitys administrative offices in Grand Rapids, Michigan.
The principal components of our continued reorganization and
cost reduction efforts include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions as a result of facility closings, facility
reorganizations and consolidation of administrative functions; |
|
|
|
Shutdown costs, including those costs that are necessary to
prepare abandoned facilities for closure; |
|
|
|
Costs incurred after shutdown such as lease obligations or
termination costs, utilities and property taxes; |
|
|
|
Costs associated with the reorganization of the WhiteWave Foods
Company supply chain and distribution activities, including
termination of certain contractual agreements; and |
|
|
|
Write-downs of property, plant and equipment and other assets,
primarily for asset impairments as a result of facilities that
are no longer used in operations. The impairments relate
primarily to owned buildings, land and equipment at the
facilities, which are written down to their estimated fair value
and held for sale. The effect of suspending depreciation on the
buildings and equipment related to the closed facilities was not
significant. The carrying value of closed facilities at
December 31, 2004 was approximately $15.8 million. We
are marketing these properties for sale. |
We consider several factors when evaluating a potential facility
closure, including, among other things, the impact of such a
closure on our customers, the impact on production, distribution
and overhead costs, the investment required to complete any such
closure, and the impact on future investment decisions. Some
facility closures are pursued to improve our operating cost
structure, while others enable us to avoid unnecessary capital
expenditures, allowing us to more prudently invest our capital
expenditure dollars in our production facilities and better
serve our customers.
In the second quarter of 2004, we sold a closed Dairy Group
facility in Honolulu, Hawaii. In 2003, when we closed this
facility, we recorded facility closing costs, which included a
write-down in the value of the facility and accruals for certain
lease obligations. Because we sold the facility for more than
expected, we reversed the impairment charge by recording a
credit to restructuring expense of $1.7 million and
reversed $470,000 of lease obligations that were cancelled.
In the first quarter of 2003, we sold a Dairy Group facility in
Port Huron, Michigan. In 2001, we closed this facility and
recorded facility closing costs, which included a write-down in
the value of the facility. We sold the closed facility for more
than expected, resulting in a gain of $1.6 million. This
gain was recorded as a reduction of facility closing expense in
2003.
F-36
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Activity for 2004 and 2003 with respect to facility closing and
reorganization costs for exit plans approved after
January 1, 2003, which was accounted for under
FAS No. 146, is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued | |
|
|
Charges at |
|
|
|
|
|
Charges at | |
|
|
|
|
|
Charges at | |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Charges/ | |
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2002 |
|
Charges | |
|
Payments | |
|
2003 | |
|
(Gain) | |
|
Payments | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reduction costs
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,737 |
|
|
$ |
(2,775 |
) |
|
$ |
5,962 |
|
|
$ |
10,206 |
|
|
$ |
(9,553 |
) |
|
$ |
6,615 |
|
|
Shutdown costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203 |
|
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,800 |
|
|
|
(5,800 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Lease obligations after shutdown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
74 |
|
|
Settlement of contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,788 |
|
|
|
(3,788 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
(918 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
3,842 |
|
|
|
(3,888 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,402 |
|
|
$ |
(3,910 |
) |
|
$ |
6,492 |
|
|
$ |
23,596 |
|
|
$ |
(23,392 |
) |
|
$ |
6,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Write-down of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,695 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
35,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity for 2004 and 2003 with respect to facility closing and
reorganization costs for exit plans approved before
January 1, 2003, which was accounted for under
EITF 94-3, is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued | |
|
|
Charges at | |
|
|
|
|
|
Charges at | |
|
|
|
|
|
Charges at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Charges/ | |
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Charges/ | |
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
(Gain) | |
|
Payments | |
|
2003 | |
|
(Gain) | |
|
Payments | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reduction costs
|
|
$ |
3,882 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
(2,673 |
) |
|
$ |
1,443 |
|
|
$ |
(245 |
) |
|
$ |
(805 |
) |
|
$ |
393 |
|
|
Shutdown costs
|
|
|
1,657 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1,093 |
) |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
287 |
|
|
Lease obligations after shutdown
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(660 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(212 |
) |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
$ |
6,993 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,638 |
) |
|
$ |
2,292 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,219 |
) |
|
$ |
914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash charges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,708 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired Facility Closing and Other Exit
Costs As part of our purchase price allocations,
we accrue costs from time to time pursuant to plans to exit
certain facilities and activities of acquired businesses in
order to rationalize production and reduce costs and
inefficiencies. During 2004, we accrued costs to close two Dairy
Group facilities acquired in 2003 and the Horizon Organic Farm
and Education Center acquired in 2004, as well as to exit
certain acquired contractual obligations. During 2003, we
accrued costs related to the closing of an ice cream facility
acquired in July 2003 by our Dairy Group. One facility was
closed in connection with our acquisition of Maries in May
2002 and several facilities were closed in connection with our
acquisition of Legacy Dean.
F-37
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
The principal components of the plans include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Workforce reductions as a result of facility closings, facility
reorganizations and consolidation of administrative functions
and offices; |
|
|
|
Shutdown costs, including those costs necessary to clean and
prepare abandoned facilities for closure; and |
|
|
|
Costs incurred after shutdown such as lease or termination
costs, utilities and property taxes after shutdown of the
facility, as well as, costs to exit certain contractual
obligations. |
Also during 2004, we recorded certain adjustments to reduce our
acquisition liability by approximately $1.7 million related
to exit activities in our Specialty Foods Group segment. The
liabilities were recorded as part of our overall integration and
efficiency efforts related to our acquisition of the former Dean
Foods Company. These adjustments reduced goodwill.
Activity with respect to these acquisition liabilities for 2004
is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued | |
|
|
Charges at | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charges at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
Accruals | |
|
Payments | |
|
Adjustments | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Workforce reduction costs
|
|
$ |
2,871 |
|
|
$ |
2,403 |
|
|
$ |
(2,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(474 |
) |
|
$ |
2,132 |
|
Shutdown and exit costs
|
|
|
6,317 |
|
|
|
82,271 |
|
|
|
(4,020 |
) |
|
|
(1,263 |
) |
|
|
83,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
9,188 |
|
|
$ |
84,674 |
|
|
$ |
(6,688 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,737 |
) |
|
$ |
85,437 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity with respect to these acquisition liabilities for 2003
is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued | |
|
|
Charges at | |
|
|
|
|
|
Charges at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
Accruals | |
|
Payments | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Workforce reduction costs
|
|
$ |
9,002 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
(6,231 |
) |
|
$ |
2,871 |
|
Shutdown and exit costs
|
|
|
11,637 |
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
(5,820 |
) |
|
|
6,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
20,639 |
|
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
$ |
(12,051 |
) |
|
$ |
9,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. |
OTHER OPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE |
In the fourth quarter of 2004 we recognized a $5.9 million
gain primarily related to the settlement of litigation.
In the third quarter of 2003, we recognized a gain on the sale
of our frozen pre-whipped topping and frozen creamer operations
of $66.2 million. During the fourth quarter of 2003, we
recognized $2.5 million of other operating income as a
result of certain contingencies related to the divestiture of 11
facilities in 2001 being favorably resolved.
F-38
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
17. |
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash paid for interest and financing charges, net of capitalized
interest
|
|
$ |
160,886 |
|
|
$ |
182,825 |
|
|
$ |
224,561 |
|
Cash paid for taxes
|
|
|
27,453 |
|
|
|
19,788 |
|
|
|
44,738 |
|
Noncash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange of trust issued preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582,986 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Leases and Purchase Obligations We lease
certain property, plant and equipment used in our operations
under both capital and operating lease agreements. Such leases,
which are primarily for machinery, equipment and vehicles, have
lease terms ranging from 1 to 20 years. Certain of the
operating lease agreements require the payment of additional
rentals for maintenance, along with additional rentals based on
miles driven or units produced. Certain leases require us to
guarantee a minimum value of the leased asset at the end of the
lease. Our maximum exposure under those guarantees is not a
material amount. Rent expense, including additional rent, was
$129.1 million, $121.2 million and $124.5 million
for 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The composition of capital leases which are reflected as
property, plant and equipment in our consolidated balance sheets
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Buildings and improvements
|
|
$ |
851 |
|
|
$ |
707 |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
7,192 |
|
|
|
1,940 |
|
Other
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
(779 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,497 |
|
|
$ |
1,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have entered into various contracts obligating us to purchase
minimum quantities of raw materials used in our production
processes, including organic soybeans, organic raw milk and
cucumbers. We enter into these contracts from time to time to
ensure a sufficient supply of raw ingredients. In addition, we
have contractual obligations to purchase various services that
are part of our production process.
F-39
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Future minimum payments at December 31, 2004, under
non-cancelable capital leases and operating leases with terms in
excess of one year and purchase obligations are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital | |
|
Operating | |
|
Purchase | |
|
|
Leases | |
|
Leases | |
|
Obligations | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2005
|
|
$ |
1,466 |
|
|
$ |
100,617 |
|
|
$ |
325,652 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
83,821 |
|
|
|
55,193 |
|
2007
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
71,350 |
|
|
|
20,622 |
|
2008
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
60,163 |
|
|
|
18,784 |
|
2009
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
56,090 |
|
|
|
16,941 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
10,014 |
|
|
|
116,289 |
|
|
|
47,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
|
15,663 |
|
|
$ |
488,330 |
|
|
$ |
485,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less amount representing interest
|
|
|
(9,340 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of capital lease obligations
|
|
$ |
6,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Obligations Related to Milk Supply
Arrangements On December 21, 2001, in
connection with our acquisition of the former Dean Foods
Company, we purchased Dairy Farmers of Americas
(DFA) 33.8% interest in our Dairy Group. In
connection with that transaction, we entered into two agreements
with DFA designed to ensure that DFA has the opportunity to
continue to supply raw milk to certain of our facilities, or be
paid for the loss of that business. One such agreement is a
promissory note with a 20-year term that bears interest based on
the consumer price index. Interest will not be paid in cash but
will be added to the principal amount of the note annually, up
to a maximum principal amount of $96 million. We may prepay
the note in whole or in part at any time, without penalty. The
note will only become payable if we ever materially breach or
terminate one of our milk supply agreements with DFA without
renewal or replacement. Otherwise, the note will expire in 2021,
without any obligation to pay any portion of the principal or
interest. Payments made under the note, if any, would be
expensed as incurred. The other agreement would require us to
pay damages to DFA if we fail to offer DFA the right to supply
milk to certain facilities that we acquired as part of the
former Dean Foods after the pre-existing agreements with certain
other suppliers or producers expire.
Contingent Obligations Related to Divested
Operations We have sold several businesses in
recent years. In each case, we have retained certain known
contingent obligations related to those businesses and/ or
assumed an obligation to indemnify the purchasers of the
businesses for certain unknown contingent liabilities, including
environmental liabilities. In the case of the sale of our Puerto
Rico operations, we were required to post collateral, including
one surety bond and one letter of credit, to secure our
obligation to satisfy the retained known liabilities and to
fulfill our indemnification obligation. We believe we have
established adequate reserves for any potential liability
related to our divested businesses. Moreover, we do not expect
any liability that we may have for these retained liabilities,
or any indemnification liability, to be material.
Insurance We retain selected levels of
property and casualty risks, primarily related to employee
health care, workers compensation claims and other
casualty losses. Many of these potential losses are covered
under conventional insurance programs with third party carriers
with high deductible limits. In other areas, we are self-insured
with stop-loss coverages. These deductibles range from $350,000
for medical claims to $2 million for casualty claims. We
believe we have established adequate reserves to cover these
claims.
Litigation, Investigations and Audits We are
parties from time to time to certain claims, litigation, audits
and investigations. We believe that we have established adequate
reserves to satisfy any potential liability we may have under
all such claims, litigations, audits and investigations that are
currently pending. In
F-40
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
our opinion, the settlement of any such currently pending or
threatened matter is not expected to have a material adverse
impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
|
|
19. |
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
Pursuant to SFAS No. 107, Disclosure About Fair
Value of Financial Instruments, we are required to
disclose an estimate of the fair value of our financial
instruments as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.
SFAS No. 107 defines the fair value of financial
instruments as the amount at which the instrument could be
exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties.
Due to their near-term maturities, the carrying amounts of
accounts receivable and accounts payable are considered
equivalent to fair value. In addition, because the interest
rates on our senior credit facility and most other debt are
variable, their fair values approximate their carrying values.
We have senior notes with an aggregate face value of
$700 million with fixed interest rates ranging from 6.625%
to 8.15% at December 31, 2004. These notes were issued by
Legacy Dean prior to our acquisition of Legacy Dean, and had a
fair market value of $737.2 million at December 31,
2004.
We have entered into various interest rate agreements to reduce
our sensitivity to changes in interest rates on our variable
rate debt. The fair values of these instruments and our senior
notes were determined based on fair values for similar
instruments with similar terms. The following table presents the
carrying value and fair value of our senior notes and interest
rate agreements at December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Carrying Value | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
of Liability | |
|
of Liability | |
|
of Liability | |
|
of Liability | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Senior notes
|
|
$ |
664,696 |
|
|
$ |
737,188 |
|
|
$ |
660,663 |
|
|
$ |
699,234 |
|
Interest rate agreements
|
|
|
17,061 |
|
|
|
17,061 |
|
|
|
48,368 |
|
|
|
48,368 |
|
20. SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC
INFORMATION AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS
We currently have three reportable segments: the Dairy Group,
WhiteWave Foods Company and the Specialty Foods Group.
Our Dairy Group segment is our largest segment. It manufactures,
markets and distributes a wide variety of branded and private
label dairy case products, such as milk, cream, ice cream,
cultured dairy products and juices, to retailers, distributors,
foodservice outlets, schools and governmental entities across
the United States.
Our WhiteWave Foods Company segment manufactures, develops,
markets and sells a variety of nationally branded soy, dairy and
dairy-related products, such as Silk soymilk and cultured
soy products, Horizon Organic milk, juice and other
products; International Delight coffee creamers; and
LAND OLAKES fluid and cultured products. WhiteWave
Foods Company sells its products to a variety of customers,
including grocery stores, club stores, natural foods stores,
mass merchandisers, convenience stores and foodservice outlets.
The WhiteWave Foods Companys operations have historically
been conducted through three distinct operating units: White
Wave, Horizon Organic and Dean National Brand Group. We are
currently in the process of consolidating these three operating
units and expect the consolidation to be completed in 2006.
Prior to 2004, we had a Morningstar Foods division that
manufactured, marketed and sold all of our nationally branded
products except for our soy products, and also manufactured and
sold private label dairy products. Effective January 1,
2004, we (1) shifted all of Morningstar Foods private
label sales and all of its manufacturing operations to the Dairy
Group, (2) formed the Dean National Brand Group, and
(3) transferred Morningstar Foods branded business to
the Dean National Brand Group. As a result of this
F-41
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
reorganization, we implemented a new segment reporting structure
effective January 1, 2004. All periods prior to 2004 have
been restated to reflect our new segment reporting structure.
The Dairy Group, which now manufactures a portion of WhiteWave
Foods Companys products, transfers finished products to
WhiteWave Foods Company at or near cost. A small percentage of
our WhiteWave Foods Companys products (approximately
$50.6 million and $23.7 million in 2004 and 2003,
respectively) are sold through the Dairy Groups direct
store delivery network. Those sales, together with their related
costs, are included in WhiteWave Foods Company for segment
reporting purposes. Fixed assets, capital expenditures and
depreciation related to our facilities that manufacture
WhiteWave Foods Companys products (except for two
manufacturing facilities which are owned and operated by White
Wave) are reported as part of the Dairy Group, while intangibles
and any associated amortization related to WhiteWave Foods
Companys brands are reported as part of WhiteWave Foods
Company.
Our Specialty Foods Group is the nations leading private
label pickle processor, and one of the largest manufacturers and
sellers of non-dairy powdered creamer in the United States. The
Specialty Foods Group also manufactures and sells a variety of
other foods, such as sauces and puddings.
Our International Group, which does not qualify as a reportable
segment, manufactures, markets and sells private label and
branded milk, butter and cream through its internal sales force
to retailers and distributors across Spain and Portugal. Net
sales, income and assets of the International Group are
reflected in the charts below on the Corporate/ Other lines.
We evaluate the performance of our segments based on operating
profit or loss before gains and losses on the sale of assets,
facility closing and reorganization costs and foreign exchange
gains and losses. Therefore, the measure of segment profit or
loss presented below is before such items.
The amounts in the following tables are obtained from reports
used by our executive management team and do not include any
allocated income taxes or management fees. There are no
significant non-cash items reported in segment profit or loss
other than depreciation and amortization.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net sales to external customers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
8,646,387 |
|
|
$ |
7,542,102 |
|
|
$ |
7,600,985 |
|
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
1,188,401 |
|
|
|
713,425 |
|
|
|
517,304 |
|
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
676,768 |
|
|
|
684,207 |
|
|
|
673,604 |
|
|
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
310,729 |
|
|
|
244,882 |
|
|
|
199,571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
10,822,285 |
|
|
$ |
9,184,616 |
|
|
$ |
8,991,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
56,844 |
|
|
$ |
27,982 |
|
|
$ |
4,711 |
|
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
7,483 |
|
|
|
1,618 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
3,594 |
|
|
|
10,692 |
|
|
|
16,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
67,921 |
|
|
$ |
40,292 |
|
|
$ |
21,509 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002(1) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Operating income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
594,462 |
|
|
$ |
641,020 |
|
|
$ |
592,455 |
|
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
118,400 |
|
|
|
33,575 |
|
|
|
59,198 |
|
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
68,426 |
|
|
|
101,292 |
|
|
|
98,874 |
|
|
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
(85,599 |
) |
|
|
(66,834 |
) |
|
|
(68,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income
|
|
|
695,689 |
|
|
|
709,053 |
|
|
|
681,657 |
|
|
Facility closing and reorganization costs
|
|
|
34,695 |
|
|
|
11,787 |
|
|
|
19,050 |
|
|
Other operating income
|
|
|
(5,899 |
) |
|
|
(68,719 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
666,893 |
|
|
|
765,985 |
|
|
|
662,607 |
|
Other (income) expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and financing charges
|
|
|
204,770 |
|
|
|
195,298 |
|
|
|
231,263 |
|
|
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
7,899 |
|
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
|
(253 |
) |
|
|
(2,625 |
) |
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated income from continuing operations before tax
|
|
$ |
462,376 |
|
|
$ |
573,556 |
|
|
$ |
420,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
177,720 |
|
|
$ |
154,812 |
|
|
$ |
138,450 |
|
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
9,905 |
|
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
16,126 |
|
|
|
14,505 |
|
|
|
14,101 |
|
|
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
19,796 |
|
|
|
20,775 |
|
|
|
20,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
223,547 |
|
|
$ |
191,885 |
|
|
$ |
173,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
5,397,694 |
|
|
$ |
5,207,262 |
|
|
$ |
5,213,748 |
|
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
1,219,210 |
|
|
|
638,788 |
|
|
|
272,486 |
|
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
604,687 |
|
|
|
635,321 |
|
|
|
617,210 |
|
|
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
534,777 |
|
|
|
511,165 |
|
|
|
478,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
7,756,368 |
|
|
$ |
6,992,536 |
|
|
$ |
6,582,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dairy Group
|
|
$ |
270,682 |
|
|
$ |
245,078 |
|
|
$ |
222,359 |
|
|
WhiteWave Foods Company
|
|
|
27,969 |
|
|
|
12,714 |
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
Specialty Foods Group
|
|
|
21,905 |
|
|
|
18,511 |
|
|
|
11,176 |
|
|
Corporate/ Other
|
|
|
35,580 |
|
|
|
15,359 |
|
|
|
6,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
356,136 |
|
|
$ |
291,662 |
|
|
$ |
241,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Balances for 2002 have been restated to remove our Puerto Rico
operations, which have been reclassified as discontinued
operations. |
F-43
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Geographic Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales | |
|
Long-Lived Assets | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002(1) | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
United States
|
|
$ |
10,461,706 |
|
|
$ |
8,939,734 |
|
|
$ |
8,791,893 |
|
|
$ |
5,915,413 |
|
|
$ |
5,429,202 |
|
|
$ |
5,137,695 |
|
Europe
|
|
|
360,579 |
|
|
|
244,882 |
|
|
|
199,571 |
|
|
|
244,531 |
|
|
|
162,453 |
|
|
|
126,984 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
10,822,285 |
|
|
$ |
9,184,616 |
|
|
$ |
8,991,464 |
|
|
$ |
6,159,944 |
|
|
$ |
5,591,655 |
|
|
$ |
5,264,679 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Net sales for 2002 have been restated to remove to our Puerto
Rico operations, which has been reclassified as discontinued
operations. |
Major Customers Our Dairy Group and Specialty
Foods Group segments each had one customer that represented
greater than 10% of their 2004 sales. Approximately 13.1% of our
consolidated 2004 sales were to that same customer. In addition,
our International Group had three customers that represented
greater than 10% of their 2004 sales. Each of these customers
represented less than 1% of our consolidated sales.
|
|
21. |
QUARTERLY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited) |
The following is a summary of our unaudited quarterly results of
operations for 2004 and 2003.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
2,452,151 |
|
|
$ |
2,806,564 |
|
|
$ |
2,772,495 |
|
|
$ |
2,791,075 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
612,445 |
|
|
|
638,198 |
|
|
|
644,813 |
|
|
|
669,073 |
|
Net income(1)(2)
|
|
|
69,240 |
|
|
|
77,073 |
|
|
|
40,192 |
|
|
|
98,869 |
|
Earnings per common share(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.64 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
2,144,878 |
|
|
$ |
2,222,572 |
|
|
$ |
2,306,848 |
|
|
$ |
2,510,318 |
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
571,233 |
|
|
|
601,153 |
|
|
|
593,537 |
|
|
|
610,486 |
|
Net income(4)(5)
|
|
|
63,209 |
|
|
|
83,789 |
|
|
|
122,162 |
|
|
|
86,543 |
|
Earnings per common share(3):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.49 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
(1) |
The results for the first, third and fourth quarters include
facility closing and reorganization costs, net of tax, of
$4.7 million, $12.5 million, and $3.8 million,
respectively. |
|
(2) |
The results for the third quarter of 2004 include a charge of
$21.2 million, net of tax, related to the early
extinguishment of debt. The results for the fourth quarter of
2004 include other operating income related to the settlement of
litigation of $3.8 million, net of taxes. |
|
(3) |
Earnings per common share calculations for each of the quarters
were based on the basic and diluted weighted average number of
shares outstanding for each quarter, and the sum of the quarters
may not necessarily be equal to the full year earnings per
common share amount. |
F-44
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
(4) |
The results for the first, second, third and fourth quarters
include facility closing and reorganization costs, net of tax,
of $(1.0) million, $1.9 million, $1.3 million and
$5.2 million, respectively. |
|
(5) |
The results for the third and fourth quarters include a gain on
sale of the frozen pre-whipped topping and frozen creamer
operations and income related to the divestiture of 11
facilities in 2001 of $40.9 million, net of tax, and
$1.8 million net of tax, respectively. |
|
|
22. |
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Real Property Lease We lease the land for our
Franklin, Massachusetts facility from a partnership in which
Alan Bernon, Chief Operating Officer of the Northeast region of
our Dairy Group and a member of our Board of Directors, owns a
13.45% minority interest. (The remaining interests are owned by
members of Mr. Bernons family.) Our lease payments
were $700,000 in 2004, 2003 and 2002.
Minority Interest in Consolidated Container Holding
Company We hold our minority interest in
Consolidated Container Company through our subsidiary Franklin
Plastics, Inc., in which we own an approximately 99% interest.
Alan Bernon, Chief Operating Officer of the Northeast region of
our Dairy Group and a member of our Board of Directors, and his
brother, Peter Bernon, collectively own less than 1% of Franklin
Plastics, Inc. We spent approximately $235.5 million,
$167.9 million and $128.7 million on products
purchased from CCC for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003 and 2002, respectively. In the fourth quarter of 2004 we
purchased equipment previously owned and operated by CCC
totaling $3.2 million.
Aircraft Leases On March 24, 2003, the
independent members of our Board of Directors voted to purchase
two companies from Gregg Engles (our Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of our Board of Directors) and Pete Schenkel (President
of our Dairy Group and also a member of our Board of Directors).
The companies owned two aircraft which we previously leased from
them. As consideration for the purchase of the lessor companies
from Messrs. Engles and Schenkel, we assumed the
indebtedness that the lessor entities incurred to finance the
purchase of the aircraft. No other consideration was paid to
Mr. Engles or Mr. Schenkel, directly or indirectly.
The aggregate principal balance of the indebtedness that we
assumed was approximately $9.6 million, which approximated
the then-current fair market value of the aircraft. Because the
market value of the assets we acquired in the transaction was
equal to the value of the liabilities that we assumed, there was
no income statement impact related to the transaction. Prior to
the acquisition, we paid the companies a combined total of
$2.1 million during 2002 under the aircraft lease
agreements.
|
|
23. |
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (unaudited) |
Tax Free Spin-Off of Specialty Foods Group On
January 27, 2005, we announced our intent to pursue a
tax-free spin-off of our Specialty Foods Group. The spin-off
will create a publicly-traded food manufacturing company serving
the retail grocery and foodservice markets with approximately
1,800 employees and estimated 2005 net sales of over
$700 million. Also effective January 27, 2005, we
hired a management team, headed by Sam Reed, former CEO of
Keebler Foods Company, to lead the new company. In conjunction
with their employment, the management team made a cash
investment of $10 million in the Specialty Foods Group,
representing 1.7% ownership of the new business.
As part of the spin-off, we intend to transfer our Mocha
Mix® non-dairy creamer, Second Nature® egg
substitute and foodservice dressings businesses to the Specialty
Foods Group from WhiteWave Foods Company and our Dairy Group.
The spin-off is intended to take the form of a tax-free
distribution to our shareholders of a new publicly-traded stock,
which we expect to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange. We
expect the spin-off to be completed in the third quarter of
2005, subject to confirmation by the Internal Revenue Service of
the tax-free nature of the transaction, registration of the new
security with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other
customary closing conditions.
F-45
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Receivables-Backed Facility Amendment On
January 3, 2005, we amended our receivables-backed loan
pursuant to which (1) Horizon Organic and White Wave became
parties to the facility, (2) the facility borrowing limit
was increased to $600 million from $500 million and
(3) the facility termination date was extended to
November 17, 2007.
F-46
|
|
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
During our two most recent fiscal years, no independent
accountant who was engaged as the principal accountant to audit
our financial statements, nor any independent accountant who was
engaged to audit a significant subsidiary and on whom our
principal accountant expressed reliance in its report, has
resigned or been dismissed.
|
|
Item 9A. |
Controls and Procedures |
Controls Evaluation and Related CEO and CFO Certifications
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design
and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (Disclosure Controls) as of the end
of the period covered by this annual report. The controls
evaluation was done under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including our Chief Executive
Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO).
Attached as exhibits to this annual report are certifications of
the CEO and the CFO, which are required in accordance with
Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. This Controls and
Procedures section includes the information concerning the
controls evaluation referred to in the certifications and it
should be read in conjunction with the certifications for a more
complete understanding of the topics presented.
Definition of Disclosure Controls
Disclosure Controls are controls and procedures designed to
reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in
our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the SEC) is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed to
reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. Our Disclosure Controls include components of our
internal control over financial reporting, which consists of
control processes designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements in accordance with US
generally accepted accounting principles.
Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls
We do not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our internal
controls over financial reporting will prevent all error and all
fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and
operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the control systems objectives will be met. Further,
the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there
are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls
can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been
detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that
judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns
can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also
be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by
collusion of two or more people, or by management override of
the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future
events, and there can be no assurance that any design will
succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future
conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of
compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent
limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements
due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Scope of the Controls Evaluation
Our evaluations of our Disclosure Controls include reviews of
the controls objectives and design, our implementation of
the controls and the effect of the controls on the information
generated for use in our SEC filings. In the course of our
controls evaluations, we seek to identify data errors, controls
problems or acts of
53
fraud and confirm that appropriate corrective actions, including
process improvements, are undertaken. Many of the components of
our Disclosure Controls are evaluated on an ongoing basis by our
Audit Services department. The overall goals of these various
evaluation activities are to monitor our Disclosure Controls,
and to modify them as necessary. Our intent is to maintain the
Disclosure Controls as dynamic systems that change as conditions
warrant.
Conclusions
Based upon our most recent controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO
have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this
annual report, our Disclosure Controls were effective at the
reasonable assurance level. In the fourth quarter of 2004, there
was no change in our internal control over financial reporting
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART III
|
|
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers |
Incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement (to be
filed) for our May 24, 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
Incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement (to be
filed) for our May 24, 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
Incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement (to be
filed) for our May 24, 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
Incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement (to be
filed) for our May 24, 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
|
|
Item 14. |
Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
Incorporated herein by reference to our proxy statement (to be
filed) for our May 24, 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
54
PART IV
|
|
Item 15. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
Financial Statements
The following Consolidated Financial Statements are filed as
part of this report or are incorporated herein as indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-6 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
Financial Statement Schedules
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Exhibits
See Index to Exhibits.
55
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
By: /s/ Ronald L.
McCrummen
|
|
|
|
Ronald L. McCrummen |
|
Senior Vice President and |
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
Dated March 16, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gregg L. Engles
Gregg
L. Engles |
|
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Barry A. Fromberg
Barry
A. Fromberg |
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Ronald L. McCrummen
Ronald
L. McCrummen |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal
Accounting Officer) |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Alan Bernon
Alan
Bernon |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Lewis M. Collens
Lewis
M. Collens |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Tom Davis
Tom
Davis |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Stephen L. Green
Stephen
L. Green |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Janet Hill
Janet
Hill |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Joseph S. Hardin,
Jr.
Joseph
S. Hardin, Jr. |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Ron Kirk
Ron
Kirk |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ John S. Llewellyn,
Jr.
John
S. Llewellyn, Jr. |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
S-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John Muse
John
Muse |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Hector M. Nevares
Hector
M. Nevares |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ P. Eugene Pender
P.
Eugene Pender |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Pete Schenkel
Pete
Schenkel |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
|
/s/ Jim Turner
Jim
Turner |
|
Director |
|
March 16, 2005 |
S-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors
Dean Foods Company
Dallas, Texas
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Dean
Foods Company and subsidiaries (the Company) as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2004, managements
assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004,
and the effectiveness of the companys internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, and have
issued our report thereon dated March 14, 2005 (which
report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the change in 2002 in the
method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to
conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
No. 142); such report is included elsewhere in this
Form 10-K. Our audits also included the consolidated
financial statement schedule of the Company listed in
Item 15. This consolidated financial statement schedule is
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects, the information set forth therein.
Deloitte & Touche
LLP
Dallas, Texas
March 14, 2005
SCHEDULE II
DEAN FOODS COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
Allowance for doubtful accounts deducted from accounts
receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries | |
|
Write-Off of | |
|
|
|
|
Beginning | |
|
Charged to | |
|
|
|
|
|
of Accounts | |
|
Uncollectible | |
|
Balance | |
Year |
|
of Year | |
|
Income | |
|
Acquisitions | |
|
Dispositions | |
|
Written Off | |
|
Accounts | |
|
End of Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2002
|
|
$ |
28,151 |
|
|
$ |
18,985 |
|
|
$ |
1,716 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
1,129 |
|
|
$ |
15,626 |
|
|
$ |
34,317 |
|
2003
|
|
|
34,317 |
|
|
|
8,143 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
12,390 |
|
|
|
32,684 |
|
2004
|
|
|
32,684 |
|
|
|
(752 |
) |
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
12,012 |
|
|
|
24,233 |
|
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated
by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001, filed April 1, 2002
(File No. 1-12755)). |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference from our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1999 (File No. 1-12755)). |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Specimen of Common Stock Certificate (incorporated by reference
from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001, filed April 1, 2002 (File
No. 1-12755)). |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference from
our Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-1858)). |
|
4 |
.3 |
|
|
|
Rights Agreement dated March 6, 1998 among us and Harris
Trust & Savings Bank, as rights agent, which includes
as Exhibit A the Form of Rights Certificate (incorporated
by reference from the Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed
on March 10, 1998 (File No. 1-12755)). |
|
4 |
.4 |
|
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement dated May 26, 2004
by and between us and The Bank of New York, as rights agent
(incorporated by reference from our Current Report on
Form 8-K dated May 27, 2004 (Filed No. 1-12755)). |
|
*10 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Seventh Amended and Restated 1997 Stock Option and Restricted
Stock Plan (filed herewith). |
|
*10 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Third Amended and Restated 1989 Dean Foods Stock Awards Plan
(filed herewith). |
|
*10 |
.3 |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File
No. 1-12755)). |
|
*10 |
.4 |
|
|
|
Post-2004 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (filed herewith). |
|
*10 |
.5 |
|
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File
No. 1-12755)). |
|
*10 |
.6 |
|
|
|
Executive Incentive Compensation Plan (filed herewith). |
|
*10 |
.8 |
|
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (filed herewith). |
|
*10 |
.9 |
|
|
|
Description of Compensation Arrangements for Executive Officers
(filed herewith). |
|
*10 |
.10 |
|
|
|
Summary of Compensation Paid to Non-Employee Directors (filed
herewith). |
|
*10 |
.11 |
|
|
|
Form of stock option award agreement for awards to executive
officers (incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (File No.
1-12755)). |
|
*10 |
.12 |
|
|
|
Form of stock unit award agreement for awards to executive
officers (incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (File No.
1-12755)). |
|
*10 |
.13 |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated January 27, 2005 between Treehouse
Foods, Inc. (our wholly-owned subsidiary) and Sam K. Reed (filed
herewith). |
|
*10 |
.14 |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated January 27, 2005 between Treehouse
Foods, Inc. (our wholly-owned subsidiary) and David B. Vermylen
(filed herewith). |
|
*10 |
.15 |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated January 27, 2005 between Treehouse
Foods, Inc. (our wholly-owned subsidiary) and E. Nichol McCully
(filed herewith). |
|
*10 |
.16 |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated January 27, 2005 between Treehouse
Foods, Inc. (our wholly-owned subsidiary) and Thomas E.
ONeill (filed herewith). |
|
*10 |
.17 |
|
|
|
Employment Agreement dated January 27, 2005 between Treehouse
Foods, Inc. (our wholly-owned subsidiary) and Harry J. Walsh
(filed herewith). |
|
*10 |
.18 |
|
|
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement for certain of our executive
officers (incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (File No.
1-12755)). |
|
*10 |
.19 |
|
|
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement for certain executive and
other senior officers (incorporated by reference from our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (File
No. 1-12755)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
|
|
|
Number | |
|
|
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
*10 |
.20 |
|
|
|
Form of Change in Control Agreement for certain other officers
(incorporated by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002 (File No. 1-12755)). |
|
10 |
.21 |
|
|
|
Stockholders Agreement dated July 31, 1997 among us,
Franklin Plastics, Peter M. Bernon and Alan J. Bernon
(incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997, as
amended on October 24, 1997 (File No. 1-12755)). |
|
10 |
.22 |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of
Consolidated Container Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference
from our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 19, 1999,
(File No. 1-12755)). |
|
10 |
.23 |
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement among us and our senior
lenders (incorporated by reference from our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004
(File No. 1-12755)). |
|
10 |
.24 |
|
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement
related to our receivables-backed loan (incorporated by
reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (File No. 1-12755)). |
|
10 |
.25 |
|
|
|
First Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Receivables
Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference from our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2003 (File No. 1-12755)). |
|
10 |
.26 |
|
|
|
Second Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Receivables
Purchase Agreement (filed herewith). |
|
10 |
.27 |
|
|
|
Third Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Receivables
Purchase Agreement (filed herewith). |
|
10 |
.28 |
|
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Receivables
Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference from our Current
Report on Form 8-K dated November 22, 2004 (File
No. 1-12755)). |
|
10 |
.29 |
|
|
|
Fifth Amendment to Third Amended and Restated Receivables
Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference from our Current
Report on Form 8-K dated January 7, 2005 (File No. 1-12755)). |
|
10 |
.30 |
|
|
|
Stockholders Agreement dated January 27, 2005 between us,
TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (our wholly-owned subsidiary), Sam K.
Reed, David B. Vermylen, E. Nichol McCully, Thomas E.
ONeill and Harry J. Walsh regarding their investments in
our Specialty Foods Group (filed herewith). |
|
10 |
.31 |
|
|
|
Form of Subscription Agreements entered into between TreeHouse
Foods, Inc. (our wholly-owned subsidiary) and each of Sam K.
Reed, David B. Vermylen, E. Nichol McCully, Thomas E.
ONeill and Harry J. Walsh regarding their investments in
our Specialty Foods Group (filed herewith). |
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries (filed herewith). |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (filed herewith). |
|
31 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith). |
|
31 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith). |
|
32 |
.1 |
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith). |
|
32 |
.2 |
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed
herewith). |
|
|
* |
Management or compensatory contract |