Back to GetFilings.com
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended: December 31, 2004
Commission file number: 000-50890
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
41-1990662 |
(State of Incorporation) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
6530 West Campus Way
New Albany, Ohio
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
43054
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(614) 289-5360
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
Registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2004 is not
applicable as no public market existed on that date for the
voting and non-voting common equity of the Registrant.
Information required by Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 of
Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
incorporates by reference information (to the extent specific
sections are referred to herein) from the Registrants
Proxy Statement for its annual meeting to be held May 23
Open, 2005 (the 2005 Proxy Statement).
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC.
Annual Report on Form 10-K
Table of Contents
1
PART I
|
|
(a) |
Description of Business |
General
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and its
subsidiaries (collectively referred to as CVG), is a
leading supplier of interior systems, vision safety solutions
and other cab-related products for the global commercial vehicle
market, including the heavy-duty (Class 8) truck market,
the construction market and other specialized transportation
markets. As a result of our strong leadership in cab-related
products and systems, we are positioned to benefit from the
increased focus of our customers on cab design and comfort to
better serve their end user, the driver. Our products include
suspension seat systems, interior trim systems (including
instrument panels, door panels, headliners, cabinetry and floor
systems), mirrors, wiper systems, controls and switches
specifically designed for applications in commercial vehicle
cabs. We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive
industry by our ability to manufacture low volume customized
products on a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our
customers. As a result of our high-quality, innovative products,
well-recognized brand names and customer service, a majority of
the largest 100 fleet operators specifically request our
products. We believe that we have the number one or two position
in all of our major markets and that we are the only supplier in
the North American commercial vehicle market that can offer
complete interior systems including seats, interior trim and
flooring.
We offer a broad range of products and system solutions for a
variety of end market vehicle applications. Over 53% of our 2004
sales were to the heavy-duty truck OEMs, with Freightliner
(DaimlerChrysler), PACCAR, International (Navistar) and Volvo/
Mack, together with their respective service organizations. In
total, approximately 72% of our sales are in North America, with
the balance in Europe and Asia.
Since 2000, we have been able to improve our operating margins
each year despite the cyclical downturn in our end markets. In
our largest market, the North American heavy-duty (Class 8)
truck market, vehicle unit build rates declined from
332,600 units in 1999 to a low of 146,000 units in
2001, rebounding to approximately 261,000 units in 2004.
Demand for commercial vehicles improved in 2004 due to a variety
of factors, including a broad economic recovery in North
America, the need to replace aging truck fleets as a result of
under-investment, increasing freight volumes and improving
hauler profits. According to ACT Research, the North American
heavy-duty (Class 8) unit build rates are expected to grow
from 176,700 in 2003 to over 300,000 in 2006.
Competitive Strengths
We believe that our competitive strengths include the following:
Leading Market Positions and Brands. We believe that we
are the leading supplier of seating systems and interior trim
products and the second largest supplier of wiper systems and
mirrors for the North American commercial vehicle market. We
believe that we are the largest global supplier of construction
vehicle seating systems based upon the amount of our revenue
derived from sales to this market. Our products are marketed
under brand names that are well known by our customers and truck
fleet operators. These brands include KAB Seating, National
Seating, Trim Systems, Sprague Devices, Sprague Controls,
Prutsmantm,
Moto
Mirrortm
and RoadWatch®.
Comprehensive Cab Product and Interior System Solutions.
We believe that we offer the broadest product range of any
commercial vehicle interior supplier. We manufacture
approximately 50 product categories, many of which are
critical to the interior subsystems of a commercial vehicle cab.
We also utilize a variety of different processes, such as
urethane molding, vacuum forming and twin shell
vacuum forming, that enable us to meet each customers
unique styling and cost requirements. The breadth of our product
offering enables us to provide a one-stop shop for
our customers, who
2
increasingly require complete cab solutions from a single supply
source. As a result, we believe that we have a substantial
opportunity for further customer penetration through
cross-selling initiatives and by bundling our products to
provide complete system solutions.
End-User Focused Product Innovation. A key trend in the
commercial vehicle market is that OEMs are increasingly focused
on cab design and comfort to better serve their end user, the
driver, and our customers are seeking suppliers that can provide
product innovation. We have a full service engineering and
product development organization that proactively presents
solutions to OEMs to meet these needs and enables us to increase
our overall content on current platforms and models. Examples of
our recent innovations that will result in better cost and
performance parameters for our customers include: a new high
performance air suspension seating system; the back cycler
mechanism designed to reduce driver fatigue; the RoadWatch®
system installed in a mirror base to detect road surface
temperature; an aero-molded mirror; and a low-weight, cost
effective tubular wiper system design.
Flexible Manufacturing Capabilities. Because commercial
vehicle OEMs permit their customers to select from an extensive
menu of cab options, our customers frequently request modified
products in low volumes within a limited time frame. We have a
highly variable cost structure and can efficiently leverage our
flexible manufacturing capabilities to provide low volume,
customized products to meet each customers styling, cost
and just-in-time delivery requirements. We have a
network of 12 manufacturing locations in North America and
Europe and are among the first commercial vehicle suppliers to
establish operations in China. Our facilities are located near
our customers to reduce distribution costs and to maintain a
high level of customer service and flexibility.
Strong Relationships with Leading Customers and Major
Fleets. Because of our comprehensive product offerings,
leading brand names and product innovation, we believe we are an
important long-term supplier to all of the leading Class 8
truck manufacturers in North America and also a global supplier
to leading construction customers such as Caterpillar, Komatsu
and Volvo. In addition, through our sales and engineering
forces, we maintain active relationships with the major truck
fleet organizations that are end users of our products such as
Yellow Freight, Swift Transportation, Schneider National and
Ryder Leasing. As a result of our high-quality, innovative
products, well-recognized brand names and customer service, a
majority of the largest 100 fleet operators specifically request
our products.
Proven Management Team. Our management team is highly
respected within the commercial vehicle market, and our senior
managers have an average of 20 years of experience in the
industry. We believe that our team has substantial depth in
critical operational areas and has demonstrated success in
reducing costs, integrating business acquisitions and improving
processes through cyclical periods.
Business Strategy
In addition to capitalizing on expected growth in our end
markets, our primary growth strategies are as follows:
Increase Content, Expand Customer Penetration and Leverage
System Opportunities. We are the only integrated commercial
vehicle supplier that can offer complete interior systems. We
are focused on securing additional sales from our existing
customer base, and we actively cross-market a diverse portfolio
of products to our customers to increase our content on the cabs
manufactured by these OEMs. To complement our North American
capabilities and enhance our customer relationships, we are
working with OEMs as they increase their focus on international
markets. We are one of the first commercial vehicle suppliers to
establish operations in China and are aggressively working to
secure new business from both existing customers with Chinese
manufacturing operations and Chinese OEMs. We believe we are
well positioned to capitalize on the migration by OEMs in the
heavy truck and commercial vehicle sector towards commercial
vehicle suppliers that can offer a complete interior system.
Leverage Our New Product Development Capabilities. During
the recent downturn, we invested significantly in our
engineering capabilities and new product development in order to
anticipate the evolving demands of our customers and end users.
For example, we recently introduced a new wiper
3
system utilizing a tubular linkage system with a single motor
that operates both wipers, reducing the cost, space and weight
of the wiper system. Also, we believe that our new high
performance seat should enable us to capture additional market
share in North America and provide us with opportunities to
market this seat on a global basis. We will continue to design
and develop new products that add or improve content and
increase cab comfort and safety.
Capitalize on Operating Leverage. We continuously seek
ways to lower costs, enhance product quality, improve
manufacturing efficiencies and increase product throughput. Over
the past three years, we realized operating synergies with
the integration of our sales, marketing and distribution
processes; reduced our fixed cost base through the closure and
consolidation of several manufacturing and design facilities;
and have begun to implement our Lean Manufacturing and Total
Quality Production Systems (TQPS) programs. We believe our
ongoing cost saving initiatives and the establishment of our
sourcing relationships in China will enable us to continue to
lower our manufacturing costs. As a result, we are well
positioned to grow our operating margins and capitalize on any
volume increases in the heavy truck sector with minimal
additional capital expenditures.
Grow Sales to the Aftermarket. While the average life of
a commercial vehicle is approximately six years, certain
components, such as seats, wipers and mirrors, are replaced more
frequently. We believe that there are opportunities to leverage
our brand recognition to increase our sales to the replacement
aftermarket. Since many aftermarket participants are small and
locally focused, we plan to leverage our national scale to
increase our market share in the fragmented aftermarket.
Pursue Strategic Acquisitions. We will selectively pursue
complementary strategic acquisitions that allow us to leverage
the marketing, engineering and manufacturing strengths of our
business and expand our sales to new and existing customers. The
markets in which we operate are highly fragmented and provide
ample consolidation opportunities.
Recent Acquisitions
On February 7, 2005, we acquired substantially all of the
assets and liabilities related to Mayflower Vehicle
Systems North American Commercial Vehicle Operations
(MVS). MVS, whose products include frames and
assemblies, sleeper boxes and other structural components, was
the only non-captive producer of complete truck cabs for the
commercial vehicle sector and has full service engineering and
development capabilities. MVS customers include International,
Volvo/ Mack and Freightliner. The acquisition of MVS adds
manufacturing facilities in Norwalk and Shadyside, Ohio and
Kings Mountain, North Carolina and a technical facility in the
Detroit, Michigan area to the Companys operations. The
acquisition of MVS was financed by an increase and amendment to
our senior credit facility.
Products
We offer OEMs a broad range of products and system solutions for
a variety of end market vehicle applications that include local
and long-haul commercial truck, bus, construction and
agricultural, end market industrial, marine, municipal and
recreation. Fleets and OEMs are increasing their focus on cabs
and their interiors to differentiate products and improve driver
comfort and retention. We manufacture approximately 50 product
categories, many of which are critical to the interior
subsystems of a commercial vehicle cab. Although a portion of
our products are sold directly to OEMs as finished components,
we use most of our products to produce systems or
subsystems, which are groups of component parts
located throughout the vehicle that operate together to provide
a specific vehicle function. Systems currently produced by us
include seating, trim, body panels, storage cabinets, floor
covering, mirrors, windshield wipers, headliners, window lifts,
door locks and temperature measurement. We classify our products
into three general categories: seats and seating systems, trim
systems and components and mirrors, wipers and controls.
4
The following table shows the percentage of sales from our
principal product categories in 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Category |
|
|
|
|
|
Seats and Seating Systems
|
|
|
53% |
|
Trim Systems and Components
|
|
|
28% |
|
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls
|
|
|
19% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
Set forth below is a brief description of our products and their
applications:
Seats and Seating Systems. We design, engineer and
produce seating systems primarily for Class 8 heavy trucks
in North America and for commercial vehicles used in the
construction and agricultural industries through our European
operations. For the most part, our seats and seating systems are
fully-assembled and ready for installation when they are
delivered to the OEM. We offer a wide range of seats that
include air suspension seats, static seats, passenger seats, bus
seats and rail car seats. As a result of our strong product
design and product technology, we are a leader in designing
seats with convenience features and enhanced safety. Seats and
seating systems are the most complex and highly specialized
products of our three product categories.
Class 8 Heavy Trucks. We produce seats and seating
systems for Class 8 heavy trucks in our North American
operations. Our Class 8 heavy truck seating systems are
designed to achieve maximum driver comfort by adding a wide
range of manual and power features such as lumbar supports,
cushion and back bolsters and leg and thigh supports. Our
Class 8 heavy truck seats are highly specialized based on a
variety of different seating options offered in OEM product
lines. Our seats are built to customer specifications in low
volumes and consequently are produced in numerous combinations
with a wide range of price points. There are approximately
350 parts in each seat, resulting in approximately
2.5 million possible seat combinations. Adding features to
a standard seat is the principal way to increase pricing, and
the price of one seat can range from $180 for a standard
suspension seat to over $400 for an air seat with enhanced
features.
We differentiate our seats from our competitors seats by
focusing on three principal goals: driver comfort, driver
retention and decreased workers compensation claims.
Drivers of Class 8 heavy trucks recognize and are often
given the opportunity to specify their choice of seat brands,
and we strive to develop strong customer loyalty both at the
commercial vehicle OEMs and among the drivers. We believe that
we have superior technology and can offer a unique seat base
that is ergonomically designed, accommodates a range of driver
sizes and absorbs shock to maximize driver comfort. We recently
introduced the Back Cycler seat mechanism to reduce
driver fatigue and a new high performance air suspension seat
system.
Other Commercial Vehicles. We produce seats and seating
systems for commercial vehicles used in the global construction
and agricultural, bus, commercial transport and municipal
industries. The principal focus of these seating systems is
durability. These seats are ergonomically designed for difficult
working environments, to provide comfort and control throughout
the range of seats and chairs.
Other Seating Products. Our European operations also
manufacture office seating products. Our office chair was
developed as a result of our experience supplying chairs for the
heavy truck, agricultural and construction industry and is fully
adjustable to maximize comfort at work. Our office chairs are
available in a wide variety of colors and fabrics to suit many
different office environments, such as emergency services, call
centers, receptions, studios, boardrooms and general office.
Trim Systems and Components. We design, engineer,
and produce trim systems and components for the interior cabs of
commercial vehicles. Our interior trim products are designed to
provide a comfortable interior for the vehicle occupants as well
as a variety of functional and safety features. The wide variety
of features that can be selected by the Class 8 heavy truck
customer makes trim systems and components a complex and highly
specialized product category. For example, a sleeper cab can
contain three times as
5
many trim components as a day cab, and can cost, on average,
over $900 for a fully loaded sleeper cab as compared to $260 for
an average day cab. Set forth below is a brief description of
our principal trim systems and components:
Trim Products. Our trim products include A-Pillars,
B-Pillars, door panels and interior trim panels. Door panels
consist of several component parts that are attached to a
substrate. Specific components include vinyl or cloth-covered
appliqués, armrests, radio speaker grilles, map pocket
compartments, carpet and sound-reducing insulation. In addition,
door panels often incorporate electronic and electrical
distribution systems and products, including lock and latch,
window glass, window regulators and audio systems as well as
wire harnesses for the control of power seats, windows, mirrors
and door locks. Our products are attractive, lightweight
solutions from a traditional cut and sew approach to a
contemporary molded styling theme. The parts can be
color matched or top good wrapped to integrate seamlessly with
the rest of the interior. We recently developed a one-step
twin shell vacuum forming process for flooring
systems and headliners.
Instrument Panels. We produce and assemble instrument
panels that can be integrated with the rest of the interior
trim. The instrument panel is a complex system of coverings and
foam, plastic and metal parts designed to house various
components and act as a safety device for the vehicle occupant.
Body Panels (Headliners/ Wall Panels). Headliners consist
of a substrate and a finished interior layer made of fabrics and
materials. While headliners are an important contributor to
interior aesthetics, they also provide insulation from road
noise and can serve as carriers for a variety of other
components, such as visors, overhead consoles, grab handles,
coat hooks, electrical wiring, speakers, lighting and other
electronic and electrical products. As the amount of electronic
and electrical content available in vehicles has increased,
headliners have emerged as an important carrier of electronic
features such as lighting systems.
Storage Systems. Our modular storage units and custom
cabinetry are designed to improve comfort and convenience for
the driver. These storage systems are designed to be integrated
with the interior trim. These units may be easily expanded and
customized with features that include refrigerators, sinks and
water reservoirs. Our storage systems are constructed with
durable materials and designed to last the life of the vehicle.
Floor Covering Systems. We have an extensive and
comprehensive portfolio of floor covering systems and dash
insulators. Carpet flooring systems generally consist of tufted
or non-woven carpet with a thermoplastic backcoating which, when
heated, allows the carpet to be fitted precisely to the interior
or trunk compartment of the vehicle. Additional insulation
materials are added to minimize noise, vibration and harshness.
Non-carpeted flooring systems, used primarily in commercial and
fleet vehicles, offer improved wear and maintenance
characteristics. The dash insulator separates the passenger
compartment from the engine compartment and prevents engine
noise and heat from entering the passenger compartment.
Sleeper Bunks. We offer a wide array of design choices
for upper and lower sleeper bunks for heavy trucks. All parts of
our sleeper bunks can be integrated to match the rest of the
interior trim. Our sleeper bunks arrive at OEMs fully assembled
and ready for installation.
Grab Handles and Armrests. Our grab handles and armrests
are designed and engineered with specific attention to
aesthetics, ergonomics and strength. Our
T-Skintm
product uses a wide range of inserts and substrates for
structural integrity. The integral skin urethane offers a soft
touch and can be in-mold coated to specific colors.
Bumper Fascias and Fender Covers. Our highly durable,
lightweight bumper fascias and fender covers are capable of
withstanding repeated impacts that would deform an aluminum or
steel bumper. We utilize a production technique that chemically
bonds a layer of paint to the part after it has been molded,
thereby enabling the part to keep its appearance even after
repeated impacts.
6
Privacy Curtains. We produce privacy curtains for use in
sleeper cabs. Our privacy curtains include features such as
integrated color matching of both sides of the curtain, choice
of cloth or vinyl, full black out features and
low-weight.
Sun Visors. Our sun visors are fully integrated for multi
access mounting and pivot hardware. Our sun visor system
includes multiple options such as mirrors, map pockets and
different options for positioning. We use low pressure injection
molding to produce our premium sun visors with a simulated grain
texture.
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls. We design, engineer
and produce a wide range of mirrors, wipers and controls used in
commercial vehicles. Set forth below is a brief description of
our principal products in this category:
Mirrors. We offer a wide range of round, rectangular,
motorized and heated mirrors and related hardware, including
brackets, braces and side bars. Most of our mirror designs
utilize stainless steel pins, fasteners and support braces to
ensure durability. We have recently introduced both road and
outside temperature devices that are integrated into the mirror
face or the vehicles dashboard through our
Road Watch® family of products. These systems are
principally utilized by municipalities throughout North America
to monitor surface temperatures and assist them in dispersing
chemicals for snow and ice removal. We have recently introduced
a new lower-cost system for use in long-haul commercial trucks
and mission critical vehicles such as ambulances. We have also
recently introduced a new molded aerodynamic mirror that is
integrated into the trucks exterior.
Windshield Wiper Systems. We offer application-specific
windshield wiper systems and individual windshield wiper
components for all segments of the commercial vehicle market.
Our windshield wiper systems are generally delivered to the OEM
fully assembled and ready for installation. A windshield wiper
system is typically comprised of a pneumatic electric motor,
linkages, arms, wiper blades, washer reservoirs and related
pneumatic or electric pumps. We also produce air-assisted
washing systems for headlights and cameras to assist drivers
with visibility for safe vehicle operation. These systems
utilize window wash fluid and air to create a turbulent
liquid/air stream that removes road grime from headlights and
cameras. We offer an optional programmable washing system that
allows for periodic washing and dry cycles for maximum safety.
We have recently introduced a new low-weight, cost effective
tubular wiper system design.
Controls. We offer a range of controls and control
systems that includes a complete line of window lifts and door
locks, mechanic, pneumatic, electrical and electronic HVAC
controls and electric switch products. We specialize in
air-powered window lifts and door locks, which are highly
reliable and cost effective as compared to similar products
powered by electricity. We also offer a variety of electric
window lifts and door locks.
Customers and Marketing
We sell our products principally to the commercial vehicle
OEM market. Approximately 75% of our 2004 sales were
derived from sales to commercial vehicle OEMs, with the
remainder derived principally from aftermarket sales.
7
We supply our products primarily to heavy truck OEMs, the
aftermarket and OEM service segment and other commercial vehicle
OEMs. The following is a summary of our sales by end-user market
segment in 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
End-User Market |
|
|
|
|
|
Heavy Truck OEM
|
|
|
54 |
% |
Aftermarket and OEM Service
|
|
|
25 |
|
Construction
|
|
|
18 |
|
Bus
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Our principal customers in the OEM market include Freightliner,
International, PACCAR and Volvo/ Mack. We believe we are an
important long-term supplier to all leading Class 8 truck
manufacturers in North America because of our comprehensive
product offerings, leading brand names and product innovation.
In our European operations, our principal customers include
Volvo, CNH Global (Case New Holland), Komatsu and Caterpillar.
We also sell our trim products to OEMs in the marine and
recreational vehicle industries and seating products to office
product manufacturers principally in Europe.
The following is a summary of our significant OEM customers in
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
|
|
PACCAR
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Freightliner
|
|
|
17 |
|
International
|
|
|
9 |
|
Volvo/ Mack
|
|
|
6 |
|
Caterpillar
|
|
|
5 |
|
Komatsu
|
|
|
3 |
|
Other
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Except as set forth in the above table, no other customer
accounted for more than 10% of our revenues in 2004.
Primarily as a result of our European operations, we derived
approximately 28% of our sales from outside of North America in
2004. Our European operations currently serve customers located
in Europe and Asia.
Our OEM customers generally source business to us pursuant to
written contracts, purchase orders or other firm commitments in
terms of price, quality, technology and delivery. Awarded
business generally covers the supply of all or a portion of a
customers production and service requirements of a
particular product program rather than the supply of a specific
quantity of products. In general, these contracts, purchase
orders and commitments provide that the customer can terminate
the contract, purchase order or commitment if we do not meet
specified quality and delivery requirements. Such contracts,
purchase orders or other firm commitments generally extend for
the entire life of a platform, which is typically five to
seven years. Although these contracts, purchase orders or
other commitments may be terminated at any time by our customers
(but not by us), such terminations have been minimal and have
not had a material impact on our results of operations. In order
to reduce our reliance on any one vehicle model, we produce
products for a broad cross-section of both new and more
established models.
Our contracts with our major OEM customers generally provide for
an annual productivity cost reduction. These reductions are
calculated on an annual basis as a percentage of the previous
years
8
purchases by each customer. The reduction is achieved through
engineering changes, material cost reductions, logistics
savings, reductions in packaging cost and labor efficiencies.
Historically, most of these cost reductions have been offset by
both internal reductions and through the assistance of our
supply base, although no assurances can be given that we will be
able to achieve such reductions in the future. If the annual
reduction targets are not achieved then the difference is
recovered through price reductions. Our cost structure is
comprised of a high percentage of variable costs that provides
us with additional flexibility during economic cycles.
Our sales and marketing efforts with respect to our OEM sales
are designed to create overall awareness of our engineering
design and manufacturing capabilities and to enable us to be
selected to supply products for new and redesigned models of our
OEM customers. Our sales and marketing staff works closely with
our design and engineering personnel to prepare the materials
used for bidding on new business as well as to provide a
consistent interface between us and our key customers. Most of
our sales and marketing personnel have engineering backgrounds
which enable them to participate in the design and engineering
aspects of acquiring new business as well as ongoing customer
service. We currently have sales and marketing personnel located
in every major region in which we operate. From time to time, we
also participate in industry trade shows and advertise in
industry publications. One of our ongoing initiatives is to
negotiate and enter into long term supply agreements with our
existing customers that allow us to leverage all of our business
and provide a complete interior package to our commercial
vehicle OEM customers.
Our principal customers for our aftermarket sales include the
OEM dealers and independent wholesale distributors. Our sales
and marketing efforts for our aftermarket sales are focused on
support of these two distribution chains, as well as direct
contact with all major fleets.
Design and Engineering Support
We work with our customers engineering and development
teams at the beginning of the design process for new components
and assemblies, or the redesign process for existing components
and assemblies, in order to maximize production efficiency and
quality. These processes may take place from one to three years
prior to the commencement of production. On average, development
of a new component takes 12 to 24 months during the design
phase, while the re-engineering of an existing part may take
from one to six months. Early design involvement can result in a
product that meets or exceeds the customers design and
performance requirements and is more efficient to manufacture.
In addition, our extensive involvement enhances our position for
bidding on such business. We work aggressively to ensure that
our quality and delivery metrics distinguish us from our
competitors.
We focus on bringing our customers integrated products that have
superior content, comfort and safety. Consistent with our
value-added engineering focus, we have developed relationships
with the engineering departments of our customers and have
placed resident engineers with PACCAR and Freightliner, our two
largest customers. These relationships not only help us to
identify new business opportunities but also enable us to
compete based on the quality of our products and services,
rather than exclusively on price. We are currently involved in
the design stage of several products for our customers and will
begin production of these products in the years 2005 to 2007.
Intellectual Property
We consider ourselves to be a leader in both product and process
technology, and, therefore, protection of intellectual property
is important to our business. Our principal intellectual
property consists of product and process technology, a limited
number of United States and foreign patents, trade secrets,
trademarks and copyrights. Although our intellectual property is
important to our business operations and in the aggregate
constitutes a valuable asset, we do not believe that any single
patent, trade secret, trademark or copyright, or group of
patents, trade secrets, trademarks or copyrights is critical to
the success of our business. Our policy is to seek statutory
protection for all significant intellectual property
9
embodied in patents, trademarks and copyrights. From time to
time, we grant licenses under our patents and technology and
receive licenses under patents and technology of others.
We market our products under well-known brand names that include
KAB Seating, National Seating, Trim Systems, Sprague Devices,
Sprague Controls,
Prutsmantm,
Moto
Mirrortm
and RoadWatch®. We believe that our brands are valuable and
are increasing in value with the growth of our business, but
that our business is not dependent on such brands. We own
U.S. federal registrations for several of our brands.
Research and Development
Our objective is to be a leader in offering superior quality and
technologically advanced products to our customers at
competitive prices. We engage in ongoing engineering, research
and development activities to improve the reliability,
performance and cost-effectiveness of our existing products and
to design and develop new products for existing and new
applications.
Manufacturing
A description of the manufacturing processes we utilize for each
of our principal product categories is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Seats and Seating Systems. Our seating operations utilize
a variety of manufacturing techniques whereby fabric is affixed
to an underlying seat frame. We also manufacture and assemble
the seat frame, which involves complex welding. For the most
part, we utilize outside suppliers to produce the individual
components used to assemble the seat frame. |
|
|
|
Trim Systems and Components. Our interior systems process
capabilities include injection molding, low-pressure injection
molding, urethane molding and foaming processes, compression
molding, and vacuum and twin steel vacuum forming as well as
various trimming and finishing methods. |
|
|
|
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls. We manufacture our mirrors,
wipers and controls utilizing a variety of manufacturing
processes and techniques. Our mirrors, wipers and controls are
100% hand assembled, tested and packaged. |
We have a broad array of processes to offer our commercial
vehicle OEM customers to enable us to meet their styling and
cost requirements. The interior of the truck is the most
significant and appealing aspect to the driver of the vehicle,
and consequently each commercial vehicle OEM has unique
requirements as to feel, appearance and features. Within the
last several years, we added new technologies, including
injection molding, compression molding and vacuum forming
capabilities, to our facilities through research and
development, licenses of patented technology and equipment
purchases.
The end markets for our products are highly specialized and our
customers frequently request modified products in low volumes
within an expedited delivery timeframe. As a result, we
primarily utilize flexible manufacturing cells in the production
of substantially all of our products. Manufacturing cells are
clusters of individual manufacturing operations and work
stations grouped in a circular configuration, with the operators
placed centrally within the configuration. This provides
flexibility by allowing efficient changes to the number of
operations each operator performs. When compared to the more
traditional, less flexible assembly line process, cell
manufacturing allows us to maintain our product output
consistent with our OEM customers requirements and reduce
the level of inventory.
When an end-user buys a truck, the end-user will specify the
seat and other features for that truck. Because each of our
seating systems is unique, our manufacturing facilities have
significant complexity which we manage by building in sequence.
We build our seating systems as orders are received, and systems
are delivered to the customers rack in the sequence that
the trucks come down the assembly line. We have systems in place
that allow us to provide complete customized interior kits in
boxes that are delivered in sequence. We keep track of our build
sequence by vehicle identification number, and each component is
identified by bar code. Sequencing reduces our cost of
production because it eliminates
10
warehousing costs and reduces waste and obsolescence, offsetting
any increased labor costs. Our manufacturing facilities are
strategically located near our customers assembly plants,
which facilitates this process and minimizes shipping costs.
With respect to all of our products, we employ just-in-time
manufacturing and system sourcing to meet customer requirements
for faster deliveries and to minimize our need to carry
significant inventory levels. We utilize visual material systems
to manage inventory levels, and in certain locations we have
inventory delivered as often as two times per day from a nearby
facility based on the previous days order. This eliminates
the need to carry excess inventory at our facilities.
Typically, in a strong economy, new vehicle production increases
and there is more money to be spent on enhancements to the truck
interior. As demand goes up, the mix of our products shifts
towards more expensive systems, such as sleeper units, with
enhanced features and higher quality materials. The shift from
low-end units to high-end units amplifies the positive effect a
strong economy has on our business. Conversely, when the market
drops and customers shift away from ordering high-end units with
enhanced features, our business suffers from both lower volume
and lower pricing. We strive to manage down cycles by running
our facilities at capacity while maintaining the capability and
flexibility to expand. We work with our employees and rely on
their involvement to help eliminate problems and re-align our
capacity. During a ramp-up of production, we have plans in place
to manage increased demand and achieve on-time delivery. Our
strategies include alternating between human and machine
production and allowing existing employees to try higher skilled
positions while hiring new employees for lower skilled positions.
During 2002, as a means to enhance our operations, we began to
implement TQPS throughout our operations. TQPS is our customized
version of Lean Manufacturing and consists of a 32 hour
interactive class that is taught exclusively by members of our
management team. While we are in the beginning phases of TQPS
initiatives, a significant portion of the labor efficiencies we
gained over the past few years is due to the program. TQPS is an
analytical process in which we analyze each of our manufacturing
cells and identify the most efficient process to improve
efficiency and quality. The goal is to achieve total cost
management and continuous improvement. Some examples of
TQPS-related improvements are: reduced labor to move parts
around the facility, clear walking paths in and around
manufacturing cells and increased safety. An ongoing goal is to
reduce the time employees spend waiting for materials within a
facility.
Raw Materials and Suppliers
A description of the principal raw materials we utilize for each
of our principal product categories is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Seats and Seating Systems. The principal raw materials
used in our seat systems include steel, aluminum and foam
chemicals, and are generally readily available and obtained from
multiple suppliers under various supply agreements. Leather,
fabric and certain components are also purchased from multiple
suppliers under supply agreements. Typically, our supply
agreements last for at least one year and can be terminated by
us for breach or convenience. Some purchased components are
obtained from our customers. |
|
|
|
Trim Systems and Components. The principal raw materials
used in our interior systems processes are resin and chemical
products, which are formed and assembled into end products.
These raw materials are obtained from multiple suppliers,
typically under supply agreements which last for at least
one year and are terminable by us for breach or convenience. |
|
|
|
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls. The principal raw materials
used to manufacture our mirrors, wipers and controls are steel,
stainless steel, aluminum, glass and rubber, which are generally
readily available and obtained from multiple suppliers. |
Our supply agreements generally provide for fixed pricing but do
not require us to purchase any specified quantities. We have not
experienced any significant shortages of raw materials and
normally do not carry inventories of raw materials or finished
products in excess of those reasonably required to meet
11
production and shipping schedules as well as service
requirements. We purchase materials such as steel, foam, vinyl
and cloth in large quantities on a global basis through our
central corporate office, and other materials for which we
require lower volumes are purchased directly by our facilities.
We purchase steel at market prices, which during the past year
have increased to historical highs as a result of a relatively
low level of supply and a relatively high level of demand. As a
result, we are currently being assessed surcharges on certain of
our purchases of steel. We continue to work with our customers
and suppliers to minimize the impact of such surcharges. We do
not believe we are dependent on a single supplier or limited
group of suppliers for our raw materials.
Competition
Within each of our principal product categories, we compete with
a variety of independent suppliers and, in limited
circumstances, with OEMs in-house operations, primarily on
the basis of price, breadth of product offerings, product
quality, technical expertise and development capability, product
delivery and product service. We believe we are the only
supplier in the North American commercial vehicle market that
can offer complete interior systems, including seats, interior
trim and flooring systems. A summary of our estimated market
position and primary independent competitors is set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
Seats and Seating Systems. We believe that we have the
number one market position in North America with respect to our
seating operations. We also believe that we have the number one
market position in supplying seats and seating systems to
commercial vehicles used in the construction industry on a
worldwide basis. Our primary independent competitors in the
North American commercial vehicle market include Sears
Manufacturing Company, Transportation Technologies
Industries, Inc. and Seats, Inc., and our primary
competitors in the European commercial vehicle market include
Grammar and Isringhausen. |
|
|
|
Trim Systems and Components. We believe that we have the
number one market position in North America with respect to our
interior trim products. We face competition from a number of
different competitors with respect to each of our trim system
products and components. Overall, our primary independent
competitors are ConMet, Fabriform, TPI, Findlay, Superior and
Mitras. |
|
|
|
Mirrors, Wipers and Controls. We believe that we hold the
number two market position in North America with respect to our
windshield wiper systems and mirrors. We face competition from a
number of different competitors with respect to each of our
principal products in this category. Our principal competitors
for mirrors are Hadley, Lang-Mekra and Trucklite, and our
principal competitors for windshield wiper systems are Johnson
Electric, Trico and Valeo. |
Seasonality
OEMs production requirements are generally higher in the
first three quarters of the year as compared to the fourth
quarter. We believe this seasonality is due, in part, to demand
for new vehicles softening during the holiday season and as a
result of the winter months in North America and Europe. Also,
the major North American OEM manufacturers generally close their
production facilities for the last two weeks of the year.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, we had approximately
2,500 employees. Overall, approximately 20% of our
employees are salaried and the balance are hourly. None of our
hourly employees in our North American operations are unionized.
We have experienced limited unionization efforts at certain of
our facilities from time to time. Approximately 45% of our
hourly employees in our United Kingdom operations are
represented by a shop steward committee. We have not experienced
any work stoppages and consider our relationship with our
employees to be satisfactory.
12
Backlog
We do not generally obtain long-term, firm purchase orders from
our customers. Rather, our customers typically place annual
blanket purchase orders, but these orders do not obligate them
to purchase any specific or minimum amount of products from us
until a release is issued by the customer under the blanket
purchase order. Releases are typically placed within 30 to
90 days of required delivery and may be canceled at any
time, in which case the customer would be liable for work in
process and finished goods. We do not believe that our backlog
of expected product sales covered by firm purchase orders is a
meaningful indicator of future sales since orders may be
rescheduled or canceled.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to foreign, federal, state, and local laws and
regulations governing the protection of the environment and
occupational health and safety, including laws regulating air
emissions, wastewater discharges, the generation, storage,
handling, use and transportation of hazardous materials; the
emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the soil,
ground or air; and the health and safety of our colleagues. We
are also required to obtain permits from governmental
authorities for certain of our operations. Although we strive to
comply with all applicable environmental, health, and safety
requirements, we cannot assure you that we are, or have been, in
complete compliance with such requirements. If we violate or
fail to comply with environmental laws, regulations or permits,
we could be fined or otherwise sanctioned by regulators. In some
instances, such a fine or sanction could have a material adverse
effect on us.
Several of our facilities are in the process of becoming
certified in accordance with ISO 14000 (the international
environmental management standard) or are developing similar
environmental management systems. Although we have made, and
will continue to make, capital expenditures to implement such
environmental programs and comply with environmental
requirements, we do not expect to make material capital
expenditures for environmental controls in 2004 or 2005. The
environmental laws to which we are subject have become more
stringent over time, however, and we could incur material costs
or expenses in the future to comply with environmental laws. For
example, our Northampton, U.K. facility will likely be required
to obtain an Integrated Pollution Prevention Control
(IPPC) permit prior to 2007. That permit will require that
we use best available techniques at the facility to minimize
pollution. Although the requirements of the permit are not yet
known, because the facility is already operating under an
integrated pollution control permit, we do not expect to have to
make material capital expenditures to obtain or comply with the
IPPC permit.
Certain of our operations generate hazardous substances and
wastes. If a release of such substances or wastes occurs at or
from our properties, or at or from any offsite disposal location
to which substances or wastes from our current or former
operations were taken, or if contamination is discovered at any
of our current or former properties, we may be held liable for
the costs of cleanup and for any other response by governmental
authorities or private parties, together with any associated
fines, penalties or damages. In most jurisdictions, this
liability would arise whether or not we had complied with
environmental laws governing the handling of hazardous
substances or wastes.
Government Regulation
The products we manufacture and supply to commercial vehicle
OEMs are not subject to significant government regulation. Our
business, however, is indirectly impacted by the extensive
governmental regulation applicable to commercial vehicle OEMs.
These regulations primarily relate to safety, emissions and
noise standards imposed by the EPA, state regulatory agencies,
such as the California Air Resources Board (CARB), and other
regulatory agencies around the world. Commercial vehicle OEMs
are also subject to the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle
Safety Act and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
promulgated by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration.
Changes in emission standards and other governmental regulations
impact the demand for commercial vehicles and, as a result,
indirectly impact our operations. For example, new emission
standards governing
13
heavy-duty diesel engines that went into effect in the United
States on October 1, 2002 resulted in significant purchases
of new trucks by fleet operators prior to such date and reduced
short term demand for such trucks in periods following such
date. New emission standards for engines used in Class 5 to
8 trucks imposed by the EPA and CARB are scheduled to come into
effect during 2007.
|
|
(b) |
Safe Harbor Provisions |
|
|
|
Volatility and cyclicality in the commercial
vehicle market. |
Our profitability depends in part on the varying conditions in
the commercial vehicle market. This market is subject to
considerable volatility as it moves in response to cycles in the
overall business environment and is particularly sensitive to
the industrial sector, which generates a significant portion of
the freight tonnage hauled. Sales of commercial vehicles have
historically been cyclical, with demand affected by such
economic factors as industrial production, construction levels,
demand for consumer durable goods, interest rates and fuel
costs. For example, North American commercial vehicle sales and
production experienced a downturn from 2000 to 2003 due to a
confluence of events that included a weak economy, an oversupply
of new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending on
commercial vehicles and equipment. This downturn had a material
adverse effect on our business during the same time period.
|
|
|
Customer concentration and selected commercial
vehicle platforms. |
Sales to PACCAR and Freightliner accounted for approximately 28%
and 17%, respectively, of our revenue for 2004, and our ten
largest customers accounted for 72% of our revenue in 2004. The
loss of any of our largest customers or the loss of significant
business from any of these customers would have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. Even though we may be selected as the supplier of
a product by an OEM for a particular vehicle, our OEM customers
issue blanket purchase orders which generally provide for the
supply of that customers annual requirements for that
vehicle, rather than for a specific number of our products. If
the OEMs requirements are less than estimated, the number
of products we sell to that OEM will be accordingly reduced. In
addition, the OEM may terminate its purchase orders with us at
any time.
We incur costs and make capital expenditures based upon
estimates of production volumes for our customers
vehicles. While we attempt to establish a price of our
components and systems that will compensate for variances in
production volumes, if the actual production of these vehicles
is significantly less than anticipated, our gross margin on
these products would be adversely affected. We enter into
agreements with our customers at the beginning of a given
platforms life to supply products for that platform. Once
we enter into such agreements, fulfillment of our purchasing
requirements is our obligation for the entire production life of
the platform, with terms ranging from five to seven years, and
we have no provisions to terminate such contracts. We may become
committed to supply products to our customers at selling prices
that are not sufficient to cover the direct cost to produce such
products. We cannot predict our customers demands for our
products either in the aggregate or for particular reporting
periods. If customers representing a significant amount of our
sales were to purchase materially lower volumes than expected,
it would have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
Commercial vehicle OEMs leverage over
outside suppliers. |
The commercial vehicle component supply industry has
traditionally been highly fragmented and serves a limited number
of large OEMs. As a result, OEMs have historically had a
significant amount of leverage over their outside suppliers. Our
contracts with major OEM customers generally provide for an
annual productivity cost reduction. Historically, cost
reductions through product design changes, increased
productivity and similar programs with our suppliers have
generally offset these customer-imposed productivity cost
reduction requirements. However, if we are unable to generate
sufficient production cost
14
savings in the future to offset price reductions, our gross
margin and profitability would be adversely affected. In
addition, changes in OEMs purchasing policies or payment
practices could have an adverse effect on our business.
|
|
|
Implementation of Business Strategy. |
Our ability to achieve our business and financial objectives is
subject to a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our
control. For example, we may not be successful in implementing
our strategy if unforeseen factors emerge that diminish the
expected growth in the Class 8 heavy truck market, or we
experience increased pressure on our margins. In addition, our
pursuit of strategic acquisitions may lead to resource
constraints which could have a negative impact on our ability to
meet customers demands, thereby adversely affecting our
relationships with those customers. As a result of such business
or competitive factors, we may decide to alter or discontinue
aspects of our business strategy and may adopt alternative or
additional strategies. Any failure to successfully implement our
business strategy could adversely affect our business, results
of operations and growth potential.
Developing product innovations has been and will continue to be
a significant part of our business strategy. We believe that it
is important that we continue to meet our customers
demands for product innovation, improvement and enhancement,
including the continued development of new-generation products,
design improvements and innovations that improve the quality and
efficiency of our products. However, such development will
require us to continue to invest in research and development and
sales and marketing. In the future, we may not have sufficient
resources to make such necessary investments, or we may be
unable to make the technological advances necessary to carry out
product innovations sufficient to meet our customers
demands. We are also subject to the risks generally associated
with product development, including lack of market acceptance,
delays in product development and failure of products to operate
properly. We may, as a result of these factors, be unable to
meaningfully focus on product innovation as a strategy and may
therefore be unable to meet our customers demands for
product innovation.
Numerous raw materials are used in the manufacture of our
products. Steel, resin, foam and fabrics account for the most
significant components of our raw material costs. Although we
currently maintain alternative sources for raw materials, our
business is subject to the risk of price increases and periodic
delays in delivery. For example, we purchase steel at market
prices, which during the past year have increased to historical
highs as a result of a relatively low level of supply and a
relatively high level of demand. As a result, we are currently
being assessed surcharges on certain of our purchases of steel.
If we are unable to purchase certain raw materials required for
our operations for a significant period of time, our operations
would be disrupted, and our results of operations would be
adversely affected. In addition, if we are unable to pass on the
increased costs of raw materials to our customers, this could
adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition. Our operating results for the year ended
December 31, 2004 were adversely affected by steel
surcharges that we are being assessed on certain of our
purchases of steel.
|
|
|
Currency exchange rate fluctuations. |
We have operations in Europe, Australia and China, which
collectively accounted for approximately 28% of our revenues. As
a result, we generate a significant portion of our sales and
incur a significant portion of our expenses in currencies other
than the U.S. dollar. To the extent that we are unable to
match revenues received in foreign currencies with costs paid in
the same currency, exchange rate fluctuations in any such
currency could have an adverse effect on our financial results.
During times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, our reported
sales and earnings from our international operations will be
reduced because the applicable local currencies will be
translated into fewer U.S. dollars. The converse is also
true and the strengthening of the European currencies in
relation to the U.S. dollar in recent years had a positive
impact on our revenues in 2003 and 2004.
15
|
|
|
Strategic Acquisitions. |
The commercial vehicle component supply industry is beginning to
undergo consolidation as OEMs seek to reduce costs and their
supplier base. We intend to actively pursue acquisition targets
that will allow us to continue to expand into new geographic
markets, add new customers, provide new product, manufacturing
and service capabilities or increase penetration with existing
customers. However, we expect to face competition for
acquisition candidates, which may limit the number of our
acquisition opportunities and may lead to higher acquisition
prices. Moreover, acquisitions of businesses may require
additional debt financing, resulting in additional leverage. The
covenants of our senior credit facility may further limit our
ability to complete acquisitions. There can be no assurance that
we will find attractive acquisition candidates or successfully
integrate acquired businesses into our existing business. If we
fail to complete additional acquisitions, we may have difficulty
competing with more thoroughly integrated competitors and our
results of operations could be adversely affected. To the extent
that we do complete additional acquisitions, if the expected
synergies from such acquisitions do not materialize or we fail
to successfully integrate such new businesses into our existing
businesses, our results of operations could also be adversely
affected.
|
|
|
Work Stoppages or Other Labor Matters. |
Many of our OEM customers and their suppliers have unionized
work forces. Work stoppages or slow-downs experienced by OEMs or
their other suppliers could result in slow-downs or closures of
assembly plants where our products are included in assembled
commercial vehicles. In the event that one or more of our
customers or their suppliers experience a material work
stoppage, such work stoppage could have a material adverse
effect on our business. Although none of our employees are
unionized, we have experienced limited unionization efforts at
certain of our North American facilities from time to time. We
cannot assure you that we will not encounter future unionization
efforts or other types of conflicts with labor unions or our
employees. In addition, approximately 45% of our hourly
employees at our United Kingdom operations are represented by a
shop steward committee, which may seek to limit our flexibility
in our relationship with such employees.
|
|
|
Technological Advances. |
Changes in competitive technologies may render certain of our
products less attractive. Our ability to anticipate changes in
technology and to successfully develop and introduce new and
enhanced products on a timely basis will be a significant factor
in our ability to remain competitive. There can be no assurance
that we will be able to achieve the technological advances that
may be necessary for us to remain competitive. We are also
subject to the risks generally associated with new product
introductions and applications, including lack of market
acceptance, delays in product development and failure to operate
properly.
Our success depends to some degree on our ability to protect our
intellectual property and to operate without infringing on the
proprietary rights of third parties. While we have been issued
patents and have registered trademarks with respect to many of
our products, our competitors could independently develop
similar or superior products or technologies, duplicate our
designs, trademarks, processes or other intellectual property or
design around any processes or designs on which we have or may
obtain patents or trademark protection. In addition, it is
possible that third parties may have or acquire licenses for
other technology or designs that we may use or desire to use, so
that we may need to acquire licenses to, or to contest the
validity of, such patents or trademarks of third parties. Such
licenses may not be made available to us on acceptable terms, if
at all, and we may not prevail in contesting the validity of
third party rights.
In addition to patent and trademark protection, we also protect
trade secrets, know-how and other confidential information
against unauthorized use by others or disclosure by persons who
have access to
16
them, such as our employees, through contractual arrangements.
These agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our
trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the
event of any unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure of
such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information.
If we are unable to maintain the proprietary nature of our
technologies, our sales could be materially adversely affected.
|
|
|
Environmental and Safety Regulations. |
We are subject to foreign, federal, state, and local laws and
regulations governing the protection of the environment and
occupational health and safety, including laws regulating air
emissions, wastewater discharges, the generation, storage,
handling, use and transportation of hazardous materials; the
emission and discharge of hazardous materials into the soil,
ground or air; and the health and safety of our colleagues. We
are also required to obtain permits from governmental
authorities for certain of our operations. We cannot assure you
that we are, or have been, in complete compliance with such
laws, regulations and permits. If we violate or fail to comply
with these laws, regulations or permits, we could be fined or
otherwise sanctioned by regulators. In some instances, such a
fine or sanction could have a material adverse effect on us. The
environmental laws to which we are subject have become more
stringent over time, and we could incur material expenses in the
future to comply with environmental laws. We are also subject to
laws imposing liability for the cleanup of contaminated
property. Under these laws, we could be held liable for costs
and damages relating to contamination at our past or present
facilities and at third party sites to which we sent waste
containing hazardous substances. The amount of such liability
could be material. We cannot completely eliminate the risk of
contamination or injury resulting from exposure to hazardous
materials, and we could incur material liability as a result of
any such contamination or injury.
|
|
|
Government regulations on our OEM
customers. |
Although the products we manufacture and supply to commercial
vehicle OEMs are not subject to significant government
regulation, our business is indirectly impacted by the extensive
governmental regulation applicable to commercial vehicle OEMs.
These regulations primarily relate to emissions and noise
standards imposed by the Environmental Protection Agency, state
regulatory agencies, such as the California Air Resources Board
(CARB), and other regulatory agencies around the world.
Commercial vehicle OEMs are also subject to the National Traffic
and Motor Vehicle Safety Act and Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards promulgated by the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. Changes in emission standards and other proposed
governmental regulations could impact the demand for commercial
vehicles and, as a result, indirectly impact our operations. For
example, new emission standards governing heavy-duty diesel
engines that went into effect in the United States on
October 1, 2002 resulted in significant purchases of new
trucks by fleet operators prior to such date and reduced short
term demand for such trucks in periods immediately following
such date. New emission standards for truck engines used in
Class 5 to 8 trucks imposed by the EPA and CARB are
scheduled to come into effect during 2007. To the extent that
current or future governmental regulation has a negative impact
on the demand for commercial vehicles, our business, financial
condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.
We have operations in Europe, China and Australia. Certain risks
are inherent in international operations, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the difficulty of enforcing agreements and collecting
receivables through certain foreign legal systems; |
|
|
|
foreign customers may have longer payment cycles than customers
in the United States; |
|
|
|
tax rates in certain foreign countries may exceed those in the
United States and foreign earnings may be subject to withholding
requirements or the imposition of tariffs, exchange controls or
other restrictions, including restrictions on repatriation; |
17
|
|
|
|
|
intellectual property protection difficulties; |
|
|
|
general economic and political conditions in countries where we
operate may have an adverse effect on their operations in those
countries; |
|
|
|
the difficulties associated with managing a large organization
spread throughout various countries; and |
|
|
|
complications in complying with a variety of foreign laws and
regulations, some of which may conflict with United States law. |
(c) Available Information
CVG maintains a website on the Internet at www.cvgrp.com. CVG
makes available free of charge through its website, by way of a
hyperlink to a third-party SEC filing website, its annual
reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q,
current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act. Such information is available as soon as such
reports are filed with the SEC.
As we continue to expand our business globally, our success will
be dependent, in part, on our ability to anticipate and
effectively manage these and other risks. We cannot assure you
that these and other factors will not have a material adverse
effect on our international operations or our business,
financial condition or results of operations as a whole.
Our corporate office is located in New Albany, Ohio.
Substantially all of our manufacturing facilities are located
near our OEM customers to reduce our distribution costs, reduce
risk of interruptions in our delivery schedule, further improve
customer service and provide our customers with reliable
delivery of stock and custom requirements even under condensed
time constraints. The following table provides selected
information regarding our principal manufacturing facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate | |
|
Ownership | |
Location |
|
Products Produced |
|
Square Footage | |
|
Interest | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Vonore, Tennessee (2 facilities)
|
|
Seats, Mirrors |
|
|
245,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned/ Leased |
|
Northampton, England
|
|
Seats (office and commercial vehicle) |
|
|
210,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Statesville, North Carolina (2 facilities)
|
|
Interior Trim, Seats |
|
|
163,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Seattle, Washington
|
|
RIM Process, Interior Trim, Seats |
|
|
156,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Michigan City, Indiana
|
|
Wipers, Switches |
|
|
87,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Dublin, Virginia
|
|
Interior Trim, Seats |
|
|
79,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Denton, Texas(1)
|
|
Interior Trim, Seats |
|
|
69,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Vancouver, Washington (2 facilities)
|
|
Interior Trim |
|
|
63,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Chillicothe, Ohio
|
|
Interior Trim, Dash Assembly |
|
|
62,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Shanghai, China
|
|
Seats |
|
|
50,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
New Albany, Ohio
|
|
Corporate Headquarters |
|
|
13,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Tacoma, Washington
|
|
Injection Molding |
|
|
25,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Plain City, Ohio
|
|
R&D, Lab |
|
|
8,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Seneffs (Brussels), Belgium
|
|
Seat Assembly |
|
|
35,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Brisbane (HQ), Australia
|
|
Seat Assembly |
|
|
50,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Sodentalje (Stockholm), Sweden
|
|
Seat Assembly |
|
|
12,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Dublin, Ohio
|
|
Administration |
|
|
14,000 sq. ft. |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
|
|
(1) |
This facility is currently dormant. |
18
We also have leased sales and service offices located in
Australia and France.
Utilization of our facilities varies with North American and
European commercial vehicle production and general economic
conditions in such regions. All locations are principally used
for manufacturing.
|
|
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
From time to time, we are involved in various disputes and
litigation matters that arise in the ordinary course of
business. We do not have any material litigation at this time.
|
|
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
There were no matters submitted to a vote of stockholders during
the fourth quarter of 2004.
PART II
|
|
Item 5. |
Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters |
Our Common Stock has been listed on The Nasdaq National Market
under the symbol CVGI since August 5, 2004. The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the low
and high closing sale prices for our common stock as reported on
The Nasdaq National Market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
First Quarter
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$ |
13.02 |
|
|
$ |
16.82 |
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
|
14.50 |
|
|
|
21.90 |
|
As of February 1, 2005, there were 63 holders of record of
the outstanding Common Stock.
CVG has not declared or paid any dividends on its Common Stock
in the past and does not anticipate paying dividends in the
foreseeable future. Any future payment of dividends is within
the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon,
among other factors, the capital requirements, operating results
and financial condition of CVG. In addition, CVGs ability
to pay dividends is limited under the terms of its Credit
Agreement.
Options to purchase common shares of our Common Stock have been
granted to certain of our executives and key employees under our
stock-based compensation plans. The following table summarizes
the number of stock options issued, the weighted-average
exercise price and the number of securities remaining to be
issued under all outstanding equity compensation plans as of
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of securities | |
|
|
Number of securities | |
|
|
|
remaining available | |
|
|
to be issued | |
|
Weighted-average | |
|
for future issuance | |
|
|
upon exercise of | |
|
exercise price of | |
|
under equity | |
|
|
outstanding options | |
|
outstanding options | |
|
compensation plans | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan
|
|
|
598,950 |
|
|
$ |
15.84 |
|
|
|
401,050 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management Stock Option Plan
|
|
|
910,869 |
|
|
$ |
5.54 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,509,819 |
|
|
$ |
9.63 |
|
|
|
401,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial
data regarding our business and certain industry information and
should be read together with Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and our consolidated financial statements and
the related notes included elsewhere in this report. The
selected consolidated financial data as of December 31,
2003 and 2004 and for the years ended December 31, 2002,
2003 and 2004, are derived from our consolidated financial
statements that are included elsewhere in this report, which
financial statements have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP as indicated by their report thereon. The
consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2002 and
the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the
year ended December 31, 2001 have been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements, which are not
included in this report. The consolidated balance sheet data as
of December 31, 2000 and 2001 and the consolidated
statements of operations and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2000 have been derived from our unaudited
consolidated financial statements, which are not included in
this report.
The unaudited financial data set forth below as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2000 is derived from the results of
operations of Trim Systems, LLC for the entire period and the
results of operations of CVS and National/KAB Seating beginning
from their respective dates of acquisition by our principal
stockholders, which occurred on March 31, 2000 and
October 6, 2000, respectively. Because these businesses
were under common control since their respective dates of
acquisition, their historical results of operations have been
combined for the periods in which they were under common control
based on their respective historical basis of accounting.
The statement of operations data and financial data included in
the Other Data section set forth below for the year
ended December 31, 2000, the pro forma earnings per share
data, the balance sheet
20
data as of December 31, 2000 and the North American
Class 8 heavy-duty truck production rates are all unaudited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
244,963 |
|
|
$ |
271,226 |
|
|
$ |
298,678 |
|
|
$ |
287,579 |
|
|
$ |
380,445 |
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
208,083 |
|
|
|
229,593 |
|
|
|
249,181 |
|
|
|
237,884 |
|
|
|
309,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
36,880 |
|
|
|
41,633 |
|
|
|
49,497 |
|
|
|
49,695 |
|
|
|
70,749 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
21,569 |
|
|
|
21,767 |
|
|
|
23,952 |
|
|
|
24,281 |
|
|
|
28,985 |
|
Non cash option issuance charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
|
3,822 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
5,561 |
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,025 |
|
|
|
15,595 |
|
|
|
25,423 |
|
|
|
25,229 |
|
|
|
31,532 |
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
(1,955 |
) |
|
|
(2,347 |
) |
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
12,396 |
|
|
|
14,885 |
|
|
|
12,940 |
|
|
|
9,796 |
|
|
|
7,244 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of
accounting change
|
|
|
(3,416 |
) |
|
|
3,057 |
|
|
|
11,385 |
|
|
|
9,231 |
|
|
|
23,930 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
(2,550 |
) |
|
|
5,072 |
|
|
|
5,235 |
|
|
|
5,267 |
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
(2,015 |
) |
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
17,449 |
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(866 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,015 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per share(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.29 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
(3.26 |
) |
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
9,337 |
|
|
|
13,893 |
|
|
|
13,827 |
|
|
|
13,779 |
|
|
|
15,429 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
9,337 |
|
|
|
13,893 |
|
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
13,883 |
|
|
|
15,623 |
|
Balance Sheet Data (at end of period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
16,768 |
|
|
$ |
10,908 |
|
|
$ |
8,809 |
|
|
$ |
28,216 |
|
|
$ |
39,296 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
312,006 |
|
|
|
263,754 |
|
|
|
204,217 |
|
|
|
210,495 |
|
|
|
225,638 |
|
Total debt
|
|
|
161,061 |
|
|
|
140,191 |
|
|
|
127,202 |
|
|
|
127,474 |
|
|
|
53,925 |
|
Total stockholders investment
|
|
|
76,287 |
|
|
|
72,913 |
|
|
|
27,025 |
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
111,046 |
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$ |
16,107 |
|
|
$ |
28,428 |
|
|
$ |
34,105 |
|
|
$ |
33,335 |
|
|
$ |
39,099 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
24,068 |
|
|
$ |
12,408 |
|
|
$ |
18,172 |
|
|
$ |
10,442 |
|
|
$ |
34,177 |
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(3,051 |
) |
|
|
7,749 |
|
|
|
(4,937 |
) |
|
|
(5,967 |
) |
|
|
(8,907 |
) |
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(13,160 |
) |
|
|
(24,792 |
) |
|
|
(14,825 |
) |
|
|
(2,761 |
) |
|
|
(28,427 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,078 |
|
|
|
12,833 |
|
|
|
8,682 |
|
|
|
8,106 |
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
Capital expenditures, net
|
|
|
3,174 |
|
|
|
4,898 |
|
|
|
4,937 |
|
|
|
5,967 |
|
|
|
8,907 |
|
North American Class 8 heavy-duty truck production
(units)(3)
|
|
|
252,000 |
|
|
|
146,000 |
|
|
|
181,000 |
|
|
|
176,700 |
|
|
|
261,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Earnings (loss) per share and weighted average common shares
outstanding have been calculated giving effect to the
reclassification of our previously outstanding six classes of
common stock into one class of common stock and, in connection
therewith, a 38.991-to-one stock split. |
21
|
|
(2) |
EBITDA represents earnings before interest expense,
income taxes and depreciation and amortization, noncash gain
(loss) on forward exchange contracts, loss on early
extinguishment of debt and an impairment charge associated with
the adoption of SFAS No. 142. EBITDA does not
represent and should not be considered as an alternative to net
income or cash flow from operations, as determined by generally
accepted accounting principles. We present EBITDA because we
believe that it is widely accepted that EBITDA provides useful
information regarding our operating results. We rely on EBITDA
primarily as an operating performance measure in order to review
and assess our company and our management team. For example, our
management incentive plan is based upon the company achieving
minimum EBITDA targets for a given year. We also review EBITDA
to compare our current operating results with corresponding
periods and with other companies in our industry. We believe
that it is useful to investors to provide disclosures of our
operating results on the same basis as that used by our
management. We also believe that it can assist investors in
comparing our performance to that of other companies on a
consistent basis without regard to depreciation, amortization,
interest or taxes, which do not directly affect our operating
performance. EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool, and
you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute for
analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these
limitations are: |
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect our cash expenditures, or future
requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments; |
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for,
our working capital needs; |
|
|
|
EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest expense, or the
cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal
payments, on our debts; |
|
|
|
Although depreciation and amortization are noncash charges, the
assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be
replaced in the future, and EBITDA does not reflect any cash
requirements for such replacements; and |
|
|
|
Other companies in our industry may calculate EBITDA differently
than we do, limiting their usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Because of these limitations, EBITDA should not be considered a
measure of discretionary cash available to us to invest in the
growth of our business. We compensate for these limitations by
relying primarily on our GAAP results and using EBITDA only
supplementally. See the consolidated statements of cash flows
included in our financial statements included elsewhere herein.
The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA to net income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2000 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
EBITDA
|
|
$ |
16,107 |
|
|
$ |
28,428 |
|
|
$ |
34,105 |
|
|
$ |
33,335 |
|
|
$ |
39,099 |
|
Add (subtract):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(9,078 |
) |
|
|
(12,833 |
) |
|
|
(8,682 |
) |
|
|
(8,106 |
) |
|
|
(7,567 |
) |
|
Noncash gain (loss) on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
1,951 |
|
|
|
2,347 |
|
|
|
(1,098 |
) |
|
|
(3,230 |
) |
|
|
1,247 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(12,396 |
) |
|
|
(14,885 |
) |
|
|
(12,940 |
) |
|
|
(9,796 |
) |
|
|
(7,244 |
) |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,972 |
) |
|
|
(1,605 |
) |
|
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
|
|
|
2,550 |
|
|
|
(5,072 |
) |
|
|
(5,235 |
) |
|
|
(5,267 |
) |
|
|
(6,481 |
) |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(866 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,015 |
) |
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
|
(3) |
Source: Americas Commercial Transportation Research Co. LLC and
ACT Publications. |
22
|
|
Item 7. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
You should read the following discussion and analysis in
conjunction with the information set forth under Selected
Financial Data and our consolidated financial statements
and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this
report. The statements in this discussion regarding industry
outlook, our expectations regarding our future performance,
liquidity and capital resources and other non-historical
statements in this discussion are forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements are subject to numerous risks
and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and
uncertainties described above in Item 1.
Business (b) Safe Harbor Provisions. Our
actual results may differ materially from those contained in or
implied by any forward-looking statements.
Company Overview
We are a leading supplier of interior systems, vision safety
solutions and other cab-related products for the global
commercial vehicle market, including the heavy-duty
(Class 8) truck market, the construction market and other
specialized transportation markets. Our products include
suspension seat systems, interior trim systems (including
instrument panels, door panels, headliners, cabinetry and floor
systems), mirrors, wiper systems, controls and switches
specifically designed for applications in commercial vehicle
cabs. We are differentiated from suppliers to the automotive
industry by our ability to manufacture low volume customized
products on a sequenced basis to meet the requirements of our
customers. We believe that we have the number one or two
positions in all of our major markets and that we are the only
supplier in the North American commercial vehicle market that
can offer complete interior systems including seats, interior
trim and flooring.
Demand for our products is generally dependent on the number of
new commercial vehicles manufactured, which in turn is a
function of general economic conditions, interest rates, changes
in governmental regulations, consumer spending, fuel costs and
our customers inventory levels and production rates. New
commercial vehicle demand has historically been cyclical and is
particularly sensitive to the industrial sector of the economy,
which generates a significant portion of the freight tonnage
hauled by commercial vehicles. Production of commercial vehicles
in North America peaked in 1999 and experienced a downturn from
2000 to 2003 that was due to a weak economy, an over supply of
new and used vehicle inventory and lower spending on commercial
vehicles and equipment. Demand for commercial vehicle improved
in 2004 due to a variety of factors, including broad economic
recovery in North America, the need to replace aging truck
fleets as a result of under-investment, increasing freight
volumes and increasing hauler profits.
In 2004, the majority of our revenue was generated from sales to
North American heavy-duty truck OEMs and their service
organizations. Our remaining revenue in 2004 was primarily
derived from sales to OEMs in the global construction market and
other specialized transportation markets. Demand for our
products is also driven to a significant degree by preferences
of the end-user of the commercial vehicle, particularly with
respect to heavy-duty (Class 8) trucks. Unlike the
automotive industry, commercial vehicle OEMs generally afford
the ultimate end-user the ability to specify many of the
component parts that will be used to manufacture the commercial
vehicle, including a wide variety of cab interior styles and
colors, the brand and type of seats, type of seat fabric and
color and specific mirror styling. In addition, certain of our
products are only utilized in heavy-duty (Class 8) trucks,
such as our storage systems, sleeper bunks and privacy curtains,
and, as a result, changes in demand for heavy-duty
(Class 8) trucks or the mix of options on a vehicle
generally has a greater impact on our business than do changes
in the overall demand for commercial vehicles. For example, a
heavy-duty (Class 8) truck with a sleeper cab can contain
three times as many features as a heavy-duty (Class 8)
truck with a day cab and can cost over $1,600 as compared to a
typical day cab which costs approximately $660. To the extent
that demand increases for higher content vehicles, our revenues
and gross profit will be positively impacted.
23
Along with North America, we have operations in Europe and
Australia and have recently established operations in China.
Approximately 28% of our revenues in recent years have been
generated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar,
principally the euro, yen and pound sterling. Our operating
results are therefore impacted by exchange rate fluctuations to
the extent we are unable to match revenues received in such
currencies with costs incurred in such currencies. Strengthening
of these foreign currencies during 2004 as compared to the
U.S. dollar resulted in approximately $11 million
increase in our revenues in 2004 as compared to 2003. Because
our costs were generally impacted to the same degree as our
revenue, this exchange rate fluctuation did not have a material
impact on our net income in 2004 as compared to 2003.
In response to the recent downturn in the commercial vehicle
market, we implemented a number of operating initiatives to
improve our overall cost structure and operating efficiencies.
These included:
|
|
|
|
|
eliminating excess production capacity through the closure and
consolidation of four manufacturing facilities, two design
centers and two assembly facilities; |
|
|
|
implementing Lean Manufacturing and Total Quality Production
System (TQPS) initiatives throughout many of our
U.S. manufacturing facilities to improve operating
efficiency and product quality; |
|
|
|
reducing headcount for both salaried and hourly
employees; and |
|
|
|
improving our design capabilities and new product development
efforts to focus on higher margin product enhancements. |
As a result of these initiatives, we improved our operating
margins each year since 2000 despite a reduction in heavy-duty
(Class 8) truck production of 30% from 252,000 units
in 2000 to 176,700 units in 2003 and rebounding to
261,000 units in 2004. We continuously seek ways to lower
costs, improve manufacturing efficiencies and increase product
throughput. We believe our ongoing cost saving initiatives and
the establishment of our sourcing relationships in China will
enable us to continue to lower manufacturing costs. In
conjunction with the start-up of our Shanghai, China facility,
we have established a relationship with Baird Asia Limited to
assist us in sourcing products for use in our China facility as
well as sourcing products for our operations in the United
States at prices lower than we can purchase components today.
Although OEM demand for our products is directly correlated with
new vehicle production, we also have the opportunity to grow
through increasing our product content per vehicle through cross
selling and bundling of products. We generally compete for new
business at the beginning of the development of a new vehicle
platform and upon the redesign of existing programs. New
platform development generally begins at least one to three
years before the marketing of such models by our customers.
Contract durations for commercial vehicle products generally
extend for the entire life of the platform, which is typically
five to seven years.
In sourcing products for a specific platform, the customer
generally develops a proposed production timetable, including
current volume and option mix estimates based on their own
assumptions, and then sources business with the supplier
pursuant to written contracts, purchase orders or other firm
commitments in terms of price, quality, technology and delivery.
In general, these contracts, purchase orders and commitments
provide that the customer can terminate if a supplier does not
meet specified quality and delivery requirements and, in many
cases, they provide that the price will decrease over the
proposed production timetable. Awarded business generally covers
the supply of all or a portion of a customers production
and service requirements of a particular product program rather
than the supply of a specific quantity of products. Accordingly,
in estimating awarded business over the life of a contract or
other commitment, a supplier must make various assumptions as to
the estimated number of vehicles expected to be produced, the
timing of that production, mix of options on the vehicles
produced and pricing of the products being supplied. The actual
production volumes and option mix of vehicles produced by
customers depend on a number of factors that are beyond a
suppliers control.
24
Basis of Presentation
Onex, Hidden Creek and certain other investors acquired Trim
Systems in 1997 and each of CVS and National/ KAB Seating in
2000. Each of these companies was initially owned through
separate holding companies. The operations of CVS and National/
KAB Seating were formally combined under a single holding
company, now known as Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., on
March 28, 2003. In connection with our initial public
offering, Trim Systems became a wholly owned subsidiary of CVG
on August 2, 2004. Because these businesses were under
common control since their respective dates of acquisition,
their respective historical results of operations have been
combined for the periods in which they were under common control
based on their respective historical basis of accounting.
Results of Operations
The table below sets forth certain operating data expressed as a
percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Revenues
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Cost of sales
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
82.7 |
|
|
|
81.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Non cash option charge
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
Other (income) expense
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of
change in accounting
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(15.2 |
)% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2003
Revenues. Revenues increased $92.9 million, or
32.3%, to $380.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 from $287.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. We believe this increase resulted
primarily from:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in North American Class 8 production, which
resulted in approximately $67 million of increased revenues; |
|
|
|
new business awards related to seats, mirrors and interior trim,
which resulted in approximately $13 million of increased
revenues; and |
|
|
|
favorable foreign exchange fluctuations of approximately
$11 million. |
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $21.1 million,
or 42.4%, to $70.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 from $49.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. As a percentage of
25
revenues, gross profit increased to 18.6% for the year ended
December 31, 2004 from 17.3% for the year ended
December 31, 2003. We believe this increase resulted
primarily from the revenue increases discussed above and our
ability to convert on the revenue increases at an overall
incremental margin of 25% without having to incur additional
fixed costs to support the increased revenues. In addition, we
continued to seek material cost reductions, reductions in
packaging costs and labor efficiencies to generate additional
profits during the year ended December 31, 2004.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $4.7 million,
or 19.4%, to $29.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 from $24.3 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. We believe this increase resulted
principally from increases in wages and the cost of additional
resources to accommodate product innovation and growth in the
commercial vehicle sector as well as cost associated with being
a public company.
Amortization Expense. Amortization expense decreased
42.2%, to $107,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004
from $185,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003. This
reduction was primarily the result of the decrease in deferred
costs from the prior year period.
Other (Income) Expense. We use forward exchange contracts
to hedge foreign currency transaction exposures of our United
Kingdom operations. We estimate our projected revenues and
purchases in certain foreign currencies or locations and will
hedge a portion of the anticipated long or short position. We
have not historically designated any of our forward exchange
contracts as cash flow hedges, electing instead to
mark-to-market the contracts and record the fair value of the
contracts on our balance sheet, with the offsetting noncash gain
or loss recorded in our statement of operations. The
$1.2 million gain for the year ended December 31, 2004
and the $3.2 million loss for the year ended
December 31, 2003 represent the noncash change in value of
the forward exchange contracts in existence at the end of each
period.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$2.6 million, or 26.1%, to $7.2 million for the year
ended December 31, 2004 from $9.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2003. This decrease reflects a reduction
in total debt of $73.5 million.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. As part of our
August 2004 initial public offering, we wrote off capitalized
debt financing costs which approximated $1.6 million. As
part of the combination of CVS and National/ KAB Seating during
March 2003, we wrote-off capitalized debt financing costs as
well as certain costs incurred in connection with our credit
agreement amendment. Total capitalized costs written-off and
amendment costs expensed during the twelve months ended
December 31, 2003 approximated $3.0 million.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate during
the year ended December 31, 2004 was 27.1% compared to
57.1% for 2003. Provision for income taxes increased
$1.2 million to $6.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004, compared to an income tax provision of
$5.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2003. The
decrease in effective rate is due to the reversal of the
existing valuation allowance after consideration of the future
positive profitability of the Company.
Net Income. Net income increased $13.5 million to
$17.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2004,
compared to $4.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2003, primarily as a result of the factors
discussed above.
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to Year Ended
December 31, 2002
Revenues. Revenues decreased $11.1 million, or 3.7%,
to $287.6 million in 2003 from $298.7 million in 2002.
Factors impacting the decline in revenues in 2003 included a
decrease in North America Class 8, bus and other customized
transportation markets production volumes, which resulted in
$17.5 million of decreased revenues and a $9.5 million
decrease in certain trim-related products. These factors were
partially offset by strong OEM sales in the Asian construction
seating market of approximately $9.0 million as a result of
rising demand for construction equipment in Asia to accommodate
economic growth in that region and favorable foreign exchange
fluctuations of $7.1 million.
26
Gross Profit. Gross profit increased $0.2 million,
or 0.4%, to $49.7 million in 2003 from $49.5 million
in 2002. As a percentage of revenues, gross profit increased to
17.3% in 2003 from 16.6% in 2002. We believe the
$0.2 million increase in gross profit resulted primarily
from the continued implementation of our Lean Manufacturing and
TQPS initiatives and the corresponding reduction in scrap and
overtime expenses at our Vonore, TN facility, as offset by
the reduction in revenues described above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million,
or 1.4%, to $24.3 million in 2003 from $23.9 million
in fiscal 2002. This increase resulted from $0.3 million of
cost efficiency improvements, offset by approximately
$0.7 million of unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations.
Amortization Expense. Amortization expense increased
51.6%, to $185,000 in 2003 from $122,000 in 2002.
Other (Income) Expense. The $3.2 million loss in
2003 and the $1.1 million loss in 2002 represent the
noncash change in value of the forward exchange contracts in
existence at the end of each year.
Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased
$3.1 million, or 24.3%, to $9.8 million in 2003 from
$12.9 million in 2002. This decrease reflects a reduction
in average total debt of $6.4 million and a decrease in
interest rates.
Loss on Early Extinguishment of Debt. As part of the
combination of CVS and National/ KAB Seating during March 2003,
we wrote-off capitalized debt financing costs as well as certain
costs incurred in connection with our credit agreement
amendment. Total capitalized costs written-off and amendment
costs expensed approximated $3.0 million.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate was
57.1% in 2003 and 46.0% before the cumulative effect of a change
in accounting principle in 2002. Provision for income taxes
increased $0.1 million, or 0.6%, to $5.3 million in
2003 from $5.2 million in 2002. The increase in the
effective tax rate relates to the mix of income and loss among
our North American and European tax jurisdictions and among our
subsidiaries and their individual tax jurisdictions.
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting. The cumulative
effect of change in accounting for 2002 represented the
write-off of goodwill as a result of our adoption of the
provisions of SFAS No. 142, effective January 1,
2002 (see Critical Accounting Policies below).
Net Income. Net income for 2003 increased by
$49.4 million to $4.0 million, from
($45.4) million in 2002, primarily as a result of the
factors discussed above.
|
|
|
Restructuring and Asset Impairment Charges |
In 2000, we recorded a $5.6 million restructuring charge as
part of our cost and efficiency initiatives, closing two
manufacturing facilities, two administrative centers, and
reorganizing our manufacturing and administrative functions.
Approximately $1.7 million of the charge was related to
employee severance and associated benefits for the
225 terminated employees, approximately $2.6 million
related to lease and other contractual commitments associated
with the facilities and approximately $1.3 million of asset
impairments related to the write-down of assets. All employees
were terminated by the end of 2001. Our contractual commitments
continue through 2005.
In 2001, we continued our cost and efficiency initiatives and
closed a third manufacturing facility. Of the total
$0.4 million restructuring charge, approximately
$0.1 million related to employee severance and associated
benefits for 77 employees and approximately
$0.3 million related to lease and other contractual
commitments associated with the facility. All employees were
terminated by the end of 2002. The contractual commitments
continue through 2005.
27
A summary of restructuring activities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
Payments/ | |
|
December 31, | |
|
Payments/ | |
|
December 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
Utilization | |
|
2003 | |
|
Utilization | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
|
|
Facility exit and other contractual costs
|
|
$ |
1,177 |
|
|
$ |
(390 |
) |
|
$ |
787 |
|
|
$ |
(509 |
) |
|
$ |
278 |
|
Employee costs
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
(488 |
) |
|
$ |
787 |
|
|
$ |
(509 |
) |
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
For the year ended December 31, 2004 we generated cash from
operations of $34.2 million. For the year ended
December 31, 2003, we generated cash from operations of
$10.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2002,
we generated cash from operations of $18.2 million.
Net cash used in investing activities was $8.9 million
during 2004, compared to $6.0 million in 2003 and
$4.9 million in 2002. All net cash used in investing
activities was for capital expenditures. Capital expenditures
were primarily for equipment and tooling purchases related to
new or replacement programs and current equipment upgrades.
Net cash used in financing activities totaled $28.4 million
for 2004 compared to $2.8 million in 2003 and
$14.8 million during 2002. The net cash used during these
periods was principally related to repayments of outstanding
borrowings under our senior credit facilities.
|
|
|
Debt and Credit Facilities |
As of December 31, 2004, our subsidiaries had an aggregate
of $53.9 million of outstanding indebtedness under various
financing arrangements, excluding $2.8 million of
outstanding letters of credit. This indebtedness consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
$4.6 million of revolving credit borrowings and a
$42.8 million term loan under a senior credit facility that
matures on July 31, 2010. Borrowings under this senior
credit facility bear interest at various rates plus a margin
based on certain financial ratios. As of December 31, 2004,
the $4.6 million borrowings under the revolving credit
facility bore interest at a weighted average rate of 7.0% and
the $42.8 million borrowings under the term loan bore
interest at a weighted average rate of 6.5%. |
|
|
|
$6.5 million of indebtedness from borrowings financed
through the issuance of industrial development bonds relating to
our Vonore, Tennessee facility. These borrowings have a final
maturity of August 1, 2006 and bear interest at a variable
rate based on the interest rate on the bonds, which is adjusted
on a weekly basis by the placement agent such that the interest
rate on the bonds is sufficient to cause the market value of the
bonds to be equal to, as nearly as practicable, 100% of their
principal amount. The interest rate was 2.2% at
December 31, 2004. |
Availability under the revolving credit facility is subject to
the lesser of (i) a borrowing base that is equal to the sum
of (a) 80% of eligible accounts receivable plus
(b) 50% of eligible inventory; or
(ii) $40.0 million. Borrowings under the senior credit
facility bear interest at a floating prime rate or LIBOR rate
plus the applicable margins to the prime rate and LIBOR
borrowings based on our leverage ratio. The senior credit
facility contains various financial covenants, including a
minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 1.30,
and a minimum ratio of EBITDA to cash interest expense of not
less than 2.50, in each case for the twelve month period
ending on December 31 of each year, a limitation on
28
the amount of capital expenditures of not more than
$12.0 million in any fiscal year and a maximum ratio of
total indebtedness to EBITDA as of the last day of each fiscal
quarter as set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Total | |
Quarter(s) Ending |
|
Leverage Ratio | |
|
|
| |
9/30/04 and 12/31/04
|
|
|
3.00 to 1.00 |
|
3/31/05 through 12/31/05
|
|
|
2.75 to 1.00 |
|
3/31/06 through 12/31/06 and each fiscal quarter thereafter
|
|
|
2.50 to 1.00 |
|
The senior credit facility also contains covenants restricting
certain corporate actions, including asset dispositions,
acquisitions, dividends, change of control, incurring
indebtedness, making loans and investments and transactions with
affiliates. If we do not comply with such covenants or satisfy
such ratios, our lenders could declare a default under the
senior credit facility, and our indebtedness thereunder could be
declared immediately due and payable. The senior credit facility
is collateralized by substantially all of our assets. The senior
credit facility will also contain customary events of default.
We acquired substantially all of the assets of MVS on
February 7, 2005 for $107.5 million of cash and the
assumption of substantially all of MVS liabilities. We
financed this acquisition with cash borrowings under our senior
credit facility, which was amended and increased to provide for
this acquisition, increasing our revolving credit facility from
$40.0 million to $75.0 million and term loans from
$65.0 million to $145.0 million.
We believe that cash flow from operating activities together
with available borrowings under our senior credit facility will
be sufficient to fund currently anticipated working capital,
planned capital spending and debt service requirements for at
least the next twelve months.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table reflects our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
1-3 | |
|
3-5 | |
|
More than | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
Years | |
|
Years | |
|
5 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) | |
|
|
Long-term debt obligations
|
|
$ |
53,925 |
|
|
$ |
4,884 |
|
|
$ |
19,320 |
|
|
$ |
22,585 |
|
|
$ |
7,136 |
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
17,480 |
|
|
|
5,082 |
|
|
|
7,140 |
|
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
71,405 |
|
|
$ |
9,966 |
|
|
$ |
26,460 |
|
|
$ |
27,309 |
|
|
$ |
7,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since December 31, 2004, there have been no material
changes outside the ordinary course of our business to our
contractual obligations as set forth above.
In addition to the obligations noted above, we have obligations
reported as other long-term liabilities that consist principally
of pension and post-retirement benefits, facility closure and
consolidation costs, forward contracts, loss contracts and other
items. In addition, we enter into agreements with our customers
at the beginning of a given platforms life to supply
products for the entire life of that vehicle platform, which is
typically five to seven years. These agreements generally
provide for the supply of a customers production
requirements for a particular platform, rather than for the
purchase of a specific quantity of products. Accordingly, our
obligations under these agreements are not reflected in the
contractual obligations table above.
As of December 31, 2004, we were not party to significant
purchase obligations for goods or services.
29
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We use standby letters of credit to guarantee our performance
under various contracts and arrangements, principally in
connection with our workers compensation liabilities and for
leases on equipment and facilities. These letter of credit
contracts are usually extended on a year-to-year basis. As of
December 31, 2004, we had outstanding letters of credit of
$2.8 million. We do not believe that these letters of
credit will be required to be drawn.
We currently have no non-consolidated special purpose entity
arrangements.
Certain Noncash Charges Related to Recent Stock Option
Grants
To reward our senior management team for its success in reducing
operating costs, integrating businesses and improving processes
through cyclical periods, we granted options in the second
quarter of 2004 to purchase an aggregate of 910,869 shares
of our new common stock to 16 members of our management team.
The exercise price for such options is $5.54 per share. As
modified, such options have a ten-year term, with 100% of such
options being currently exercisable. We incurred a noncash
compensation charge of $10.1 million in the second quarter
of 2004 as a result of the grant of these options. This noncash
compensation charge equals the difference between $5.54 and the
fair market value of our common stock as of the grant date of
these options.
Effects of Inflation
Inflation potentially affects us in two principal ways. First, a
significant portion of our debt is tied to prevailing short-term
interest rates that may change as a result of inflation rates,
translating into changes in interest expense. Second, general
inflation can impact material purchases, labor and other costs.
In many cases, we have limited ability to pass through
inflation-related cost increases due to the competitive nature
of the markets that we serve. In the past few years, however,
inflation has not been a significant factor.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in
Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements. Certain of
our accounting policies require the application of significant
judgment by us in selecting appropriate assumptions for
calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these
judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On
an ongoing basis, we evaluate estimates, including those related
to revenue recognition and sales commitments, valuation of
goodwill, accounting for income taxes and defined benefit
pension plan assumptions. We base our estimates on historical
experience and assumptions believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances. Those estimates form the basis for our judgments
that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements.
Ultimate results could differ from our estimates under different
assumptions or conditions.
Revenue Recognition and Sales Commitments. We recognize
revenue as our products are shipped from our facilities to our
customers, which is when title passes to the customer for
substantially all of our sales. We enter into agreements with
our customers at the beginning of a given platforms life
to supply products for that platform. Once we enter into such
agreements, fulfillment of our purchasing requirements is our
obligation for the entire production life of the platform, with
terms generally ranging from five to seven years, and we have no
provisions to terminate such contracts. In certain instances, we
may be committed under existing agreements to supply product to
our customers at selling prices that are not sufficient to cover
the direct cost to produce such product. In such situations, we
record a liability for the estimated future amount of such
losses. Such losses are recognized at the time that the loss is
probable and reasonably estimable and are recorded at the
minimum amount necessary to fulfill our obligations to our
customers. The estimated amount of such losses was approximately
$0.6 million at December 31, 2004. We believe such
estimate is reasonable and we do not anticipate additional
losses; however, any change in the estimate will result in a
change in period income (loss). We are subjected to warranty
claims for products that fail to perform as expected due to
design or manufacturing deficiencies.
30
Customers continue to require their outside suppliers to
guarantee or warrant their products and bear the cost of repair
or replacement of such products. Depending on the terms under
which we supplied products to our customers, a customer may hold
us responsible for some or all of the repair or replacement
costs of defective products, when the product supplied did not
perform as represented. Our policy is to reserve for estimated
future customer warranty costs based on historical trends and
current economic factors.
Valuation of Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of
the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired.
Under SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives
are no longer amortized, but reviewed for impairment annually or
more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Separable
intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives
will continue to be amortized over their useful lives. The
amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 apply to
goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30,
2001. We adopted SFAS No. 142 effective
January 1, 2002.
Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142, we completed step one
of the transitional goodwill impairment test, using a
combination of valuation techniques, including the discounted
cash flow approach and the market multiple approach, for each of
our three reporting units. Upon completion of the required
assessments under SFAS No. 142, we determined that the
fair market value of the goodwill assigned to two of our
reporting units was lower than its book value, resulting in an
after-tax transitional impairment charge of approximately
$51.6 million. The write-off was recorded as a cumulative
effect of a change in accounting principle in our consolidated
statement of operations for the quarter ended March 31,
2002. Under the valuation techniques and approach applied by us
in our SFAS No. 142 analysis, a change in certain key
assumptions applied, such as the discount rate, projected future
cash flows and mix of cash flows by geographic region could
significantly impact the results of our assessment. The
estimates we used are based upon reasonable and supportable
assumptions and consider all available evidence. However, there
is inherent uncertainty in estimating future cash flows and
termination values.
We perform impairment tests annually, during the second quarter,
and whenever events or circumstances occur indicating that
goodwill or other intangible assets might be impaired. Based
upon our 2004 annual assessment, no impairment of goodwill was
deemed to have occurred.
Accounting for Income Taxes. As part of the process of
preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required
to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in
which we operate. In addition, tax expense includes the impact
of differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes
which result in deferred tax assets and liabilities which are
included in our consolidated balance sheet. To the extent that
recovery of deferred tax assets is not likely, we must establish
a valuation allowance. Significant judgment is required in
determining our provision for income taxes, deferred tax assets
and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our
net deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2003, we had
recorded a valuation allowance of $3.8 million. As of
December 31, 2004, we determined that we no longer require
a valuation allowance due to the likelihood of recovery in
future periods. In the event that our actual results differ from
our estimates or we adjust these estimates in future periods,
the effects of these adjustments could materially impact our
financial position and results of operations. The net deferred
tax asset as of December 31, 2004 was $14.1 million.
Defined Benefit Pension Plan. We sponsor a defined
benefit pension plan that covers certain of our hourly and
salaried employees at our United Kingdom operations. Our policy
is to make annual contributions to this plan to fund the normal
cost as required by local regulations. In calculating obligation
and expense, we are required to make certain actuarial
assumptions. These assumptions include discount rate, expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets and rates of increase in
compensation. Our assumptions are determined based on current
market conditions, historical information and consultation with
and input from our actuaries. We have historically used
December 31 as our annual measurement date. For 2004, we
assumed a discount rate of 5.50% to determine our benefit
obligations. Holding other variables constant (such as expected
return on plan assets and rate of compensation increase), a one
percentage point decrease in the discount rate would have
increased our expense by $0.2 million and our benefit
obligation by $8.1 million.
31
We employ a building block approach in determining the expected
long-term rate of return for plan assets, based on historical
markets, long-term historical relationships between equities and
fixed income investments and considering current market factors
such as inflation and interest rates. Holding other variables
constant (such as discount rate and rate of compensation
increase) a one percentage point decrease in the expected
long-term rate of return on plan assets would have increased our
expense by $0.3 million. We expect to contribute
approximately $1.2 million to our pension plans in 2005.
We employ a total return investment approach in managing pension
plan assets whereby a mix of equities and fixed income
investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan
assets for a prudent level of risk. At December 31, 2004,
our pension assets were comprised of 52% equity securities, 25%
debt securities and 23% other investments.
While any negative impact of these Critical Accounting Policies
would generally result in noncash charges to earnings, the
severity of any charge and its impact on stockholders
investment could adversely affect our borrowing agreements, cost
of capital and ability to raise external capital. Our senior
management has reviewed these Critical Accounting Policies with
the audit committee of our board of directors, and the audit
committee has reviewed its disclosure in this management
discussion and analysis.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132R, a
revision to SFAS No. 132, Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits.
SFAS No. 132R does not change the measurement or
recognition related to pension and other postretirement plans
required by SFAS No. 87, Employers Accounting
for Pensions, SFAS No. 88, Employers Accounting
for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension
Plans and for Termination Benefits, and
SFAS No. 106, Employers Accounting for
Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions, and retains the
disclosure requirements contained in SFAS No. 132.
SFAS No. 132R requires additional disclosures about
the assets, obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit
cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit
postretirement plans. SFAS No. 132R is effective for
financial statements with fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2003, with the exception of disclosure
requirements related to foreign plans and estimated future
benefit payments which are effective for fiscal years ending
after June 15, 2004. We have adopted the new
disclosure requirements as effective in 2004.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs. This Statement requires that abnormal amounts
of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and spoilage
be recognized as current-period charges. The Statement also
requires that fixed production overhead be allocated to
conversion costs based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory
costs incurred by the Company beginning in fiscal year 2006. The
Company is in the process of determining the impact adoption of
this Statement will have on its results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB revised SFAS No. 123, Share
Based Payment (SFAS No. 123R). This Statement
supercedes Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which
resulted in no stock-based employee compensation cost related to
stock options if the options granted had an exercise price equal
to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date
of grant. SFAS No. 123R requires recognition of
employee services provided in exchange for a share-based payment
based on the grant date fair market value. The Company is
required to adopt SFAS No. 123R as of July 1,
2005. As of the effective date, this Statement applies to all
new awards issued as well as awards modified, repurchased, or
cancelled. Additionally, for stock-based awards issued prior to
the effective date, compensation cost attributable to future
services will be recognized as the remaining service is
rendered. The Company may also elect to restate prior periods by
applying a modified retrospective method to periods prior to the
effective date. The Company is in the process of determining
which method of adoption it will elect as well as the potential
impact on its consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
32
|
|
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in
foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. Market risk
is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market
rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange and interest
rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial
instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We do enter
into financial instruments, from time to time, to manage and
reduce the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates
and interest rates and to hedge a portion of future anticipated
currency transactions of our United Kingdom operations. The
counterparties are major financial institutions.
We manage our interest rate risk by balancing the amount of our
fixed rate and variable rate debt and through the use of
interest rate protection agreements. The objective of the
interest rate protection agreements is to more effectively
balance our borrowing costs and interest rate risk and reduce
financing costs. For fixed rate debt, interest rate changes
affect the fair market value of such debt but do not impact
earnings or cash flows. Conversely for variable rate debt,
interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market
value of such debt, but do impact future earnings and cash
flows, assuming other factors are held constant. At
December 31, 2004, all of our debt was variable rate debt.
Holding other variables constant (such as foreign exchange rates
and debt levels), a one percentage point change in interest
rates would be expected to have an impact on pre-tax earnings
and cash flows for the next year of approximately
$0.4 million. The impact on the fair market value of our
debt at December 31, 2004 would have been insignificant.
At December 31, 2004, we had no interest protection
agreements outstanding. Outstanding foreign currency forward
exchange contracts at December 31, 2004 are more fully
described in the notes to our financial statements included
elsewhere in this filing. The fair value of these contracts at
December 31, 2004 amounted to a net asset of
$0.5 million, which is reflected in other assets in our
condensed December 31, 2004 balance sheet. None of these
contracts have been designated as cash flow hedges; thus, the
change in fair value at each reporting date is reflected as a
noncash charge (income) in our statement of operations. We may
designate future forward exchange contracts as cash flow hedges.
Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign currency risk is the risk that we will incur economic
losses due to adverse changes in foreign currency exchange
rates. We use forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign
currency translation exposures of our United Kingdom operations.
We estimate our projected revenues and purchases in certain
foreign currencies or locations, and will hedge a portion or all
of the anticipated long or short position. The contracts
typically run from three months up to three years. These
contracts are marked-to-market and the fair value is included in
assets (liabilities) in our balance sheets, with the
offsetting noncash gain or loss included in our statements of
operations. We do not hold or issue foreign exchange options or
forward contracts for trading purposes.
Our primary exposures to foreign currency exchange fluctuations
are pound sterling/ Eurodollar and pound sterling/ Japanese yen.
At December 31, 2004, the potential reduction in earnings
from a hypothetical instantaneous 10% adverse change in quoted
foreign currency spot rates applied to foreign currency
sensitive instruments would not have been significant. The
foreign currency sensitivity model is limited by the assumption
that all of the foreign currencies to which we are exposed would
simultaneously decrease by 10% because such synchronized changes
are unlikely to occur. The effects of the forward exchange
contracts have been included in the above analysis; however, the
sensitivity model does not include the inherent risks associated
with the anticipated future transactions denominated in foreign
currency.
33
Foreign Currency Transactions
A significant portion of our revenues during the year ended
December 31, 2004 were derived from manufacturing
operations outside of the United States. The results of
operations and the financial position of our operations in these
other countries are principally measured in their respective
currency and translated into U.S. dollars. A significant
portion of the expenses generated in these countries is in
currencies different from which revenue is generated. As
discussed above, from time to time, we enter into forward
exchange contracts to mitigate a portion of this currency risk.
The reported income of these subsidiaries will be higher or
lower depending on a weakening or strengthening of the
U.S. dollar against the respective foreign currency.
A significant portion of our assets at December 31, 2004
are based in our foreign operations and are translated into
U.S. dollars at foreign currency exchange rates in effect
as of the end of each period, with the effect of such
translation reflected as a separate component of
stockholders investment. Accordingly, our
stockholders investment will fluctuate depending upon the
weakening or strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the
respective foreign currency.
34
|
|
Item 8. |
Financial Statement and Supplementary Data |
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
36 |
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2004
|
|
|
37 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
|
|
|
38 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Investment for the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
|
|
|
39 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended
December 2002, 2003 and 2004
|
|
|
40 |
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
41 |
|
35
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Commercial Vehicle
Group, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) (formerly Bostrom Holding, Inc., a Delaware
corporation) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders investment, and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These
consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our
audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2002, the Company changed
its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible
assets.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 3, 2005
36
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2003 and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
(except share amounts) | |
ASSETS |
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of reserve for doubtful accounts of
$2,530 and $2,681, respectively
|
|
|
40,211 |
|
|
|
46,267 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
29,667 |
|
|
|
36,936 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
3,754 |
|
|
|
6,081 |
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,995 |
|
|
|
8,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
83,113 |
|
|
|
98,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
|
15,075 |
|
|
|
12,949 |
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
56,697 |
|
|
|
64,205 |
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
3,764 |
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(39,742 |
) |
|
|
(47,953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment net
|
|
|
33,492 |
|
|
|
32,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
82,872 |
|
|
|
84,715 |
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
9,011 |
|
|
|
5,901 |
|
OTHER ASSETS, net of accumulated amortization of $1,098 and
$328, respectively
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
3,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
210,495 |
|
|
$ |
225,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT |
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
15,231 |
|
|
$ |
4,884 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
23,310 |
|
|
|
33,846 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
16,356 |
|
|
|
18,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
54,897 |
|
|
|
57,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current maturities
|
|
|
101,204 |
|
|
|
49,041 |
|
SUBORDINATED DEBT DUE TO RELATED PARTIES
|
|
|
11,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES
|
|
|
8,549 |
|
|
|
8,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
175,689 |
|
|
|
114,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 4, 8,
10, 11, and 12)
STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares
authorized; 17,987,497 shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
76,803 |
|
|
|
123,660 |
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(43,028 |
) |
|
|
(15,454 |
) |
|
Stock subscription receivable
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
2,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders investment
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
|
111,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
210,495 |
|
|
$ |
225,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
37
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
REVENUES
|
|
$ |
298,678 |
|
|
$ |
287,579 |
|
|
$ |
380,445 |
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
249,181 |
|
|
|
237,884 |
|
|
|
309,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
49,497 |
|
|
|
49,695 |
|
|
|
70,749 |
|
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
|
|
|
23,952 |
|
|
|
24,281 |
|
|
|
28,985 |
|
NONCASH OPTION ISSUANCE CHARGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
AMORTIZATION EXPENSE
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
25,423 |
|
|
|
25,229 |
|
|
|
31,532 |
|
(GAIN) LOSS ON FOREIGN CURRENCY FORWARD EXCHANGE CONTRACTS
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|
|
12,940 |
|
|
|
9,796 |
|
|
|
7,244 |
|
LOSS ON EARLY EXTINGUISHMENT OF DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
|
1,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes and cumulative effect
of change in accounting
|
|
|
11,385 |
|
|
|
9,231 |
|
|
|
23,930 |
|
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
5,235 |
|
|
|
5,267 |
|
|
|
6,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
6,150 |
|
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
17,449 |
|
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING
|
|
|
(51,630 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
(3.74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(3.29 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income before cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
(3.70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(3.26 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
38
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS INVESTMENT
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Subscription | |
|
Paid-In | |
|
(Accumulated | |
|
Income | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Receivable | |
|
Capital | |
|
Deficit) | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) | |
BALANCE December 31, 2001
|
|
|
13,843,286 |
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
(691 |
) |
|
$ |
77,010 |
|
|
$ |
(1,512 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,032 |
) |
|
$ |
72,913 |
|
|
Repurchase of common stock net
|
|
|
(64,687 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,318 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,942 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2002
|
|
|
13,778,599 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
76,803 |
|
|
|
(46,992 |
) |
|
|
(2,494 |
) |
|
|
27,025 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2003
|
|
|
13,778,599 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
(430 |
) |
|
|
76,803 |
|
|
|
(43,028 |
) |
|
|
1,323 |
|
|
|
34,806 |
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
4,259,772 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,899 |
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(50,874 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
Stock options issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE December 31, 2004
|
|
|
17,987,497 |
|
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
(175 |
) |
|
$ |
123,660 |
|
|
$ |
(15,454 |
) |
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
$ |
111,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
39
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
8,682 |
|
|
|
8,106 |
|
|
|
7,567 |
|
|
|
Noncash amortization of debt financing costs
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
Noncash option issuance charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,125 |
|
|
|
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
Deferred income tax provision
|
|
|
4,267 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
Noncash (gain) loss on forward exchange contracts
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
|
|
|
51,630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash interest expense on subordinated debt
|
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
Change in other operating items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
(9,215 |
) |
|
|
(4,744 |
) |
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
(6,243 |
) |
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
(2,360 |
) |
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(2,993 |
) |
|
|
(5,278 |
) |
|
|
11,383 |
|
|
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(1,682 |
) |
|
|
3,541 |
|
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
18,172 |
|
|
|
10,442 |
|
|
|
34,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(4,937 |
) |
|
|
(5,967 |
) |
|
|
(8,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(4,937 |
) |
|
|
(5,967 |
) |
|
|
(8,907 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock net
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,105 |
|
|
Repayment of revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(84,093 |
) |
|
|
(75,308 |
) |
|
|
(80,575 |
) |
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
80,665 |
|
|
|
79,335 |
|
|
|
58,092 |
|
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66,061 |
|
|
Repayments of long-term borrowings
|
|
|
(14,347 |
) |
|
|
(6,768 |
) |
|
|
(116,031 |
) |
|
Proceeds from issuance (repayment) of subordinated debt
|
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,112 |
) |
|
Payments on capital leases
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
Debt issuance costs and other net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(14,825 |
) |
|
|
(2,761 |
) |
|
|
(28,427 |
) |
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(1,508 |
) |
|
|
1,849 |
|
|
|
(2,090 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
|
3,145 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
3,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$ |
1,637 |
|
|
$ |
3,486 |
|
|
$ |
1,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$ |
11,121 |
|
|
$ |
8,533 |
|
|
$ |
7,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes net
|
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
2,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
40
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004
|
|
1. |
Organization and Background |
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (CVG
or the Company) (formerly Bostrom Holding, Inc., a
Delaware corporation) designs and manufactures seat and seating
systems, cab and trim systems, mirrors, wipers and controls for
the North American heavy truck and specialty transportation
markets. In addition, the Company manufactures seat systems for
the worldwide construction and agriculture vehicle markets. The
Company has operations located in Indiana, North Carolina, Ohio,
Oregon, Tennessee, Virginia, Washington, Australia, Belgium,
China, Sweden and the United Kingdom.
The Company was formed on August 22, 2000. On
October 6, 2000, the Company acquired the assets of Bostrom
plc in exchange for $83.6 million in cash and assumption of
certain liabilities (the Acquisition). The source of
the cash consisted of $49.8 million of debt and
$33.8 million of equity. The Company had no operations
prior to October 6, 2000.
The Acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed by the Company were recorded at fair value as of the
date of the Acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over
the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
has been recorded as goodwill.
On March 28, 2003, the Company and Commercial Vehicle
Systems Holdings, Inc. (CVS) entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger whereby a subsidiary of the Company
was merged into CVS. The holders of the outstanding shares of
CVS received, in exchange, shares of the Company on a
one-for-one basis resulting in the issuance of
4,870,228 shares of common stock. On May 20, 2004, the
Company and Trim Systems, Inc. (Trim) entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger whereby a subsidiary of the
Company was merged into Trim (the CVS and Trim mergers are
collectively referred to as the Mergers). On
August 2, 2004, the Trim merger was effected. The holders
of the outstanding shares of Trim received, in exchange, shares
of the Company on a .099-for-one basis resulting in the issuance
of 2,769,567 shares of common stock. In accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 141, the Mergers were accounted for as a combination of
entities under common control. Thus, the accounts of CVS, Trim,
and the Company were combined based upon their respective
historical bases of accounting. The financial statements reflect
the combined results of the Company, CVS and Trim as if the
Mergers had occurred as of the beginning of the earliest period
presented.
On August 4, 2004, the Company reclassified all of its
existing classes of common stock into one class of common stock
and in connection therewith effected a 38.991-to-one stock
split. The stock split has been reflected in the share and per
share amounts for all periods presented.
On August 10, 2004, the Company completed its initial
public offering of common stock at a price of $13.00 per
share. Of the total shares offered, 3,125,000 were sold by the
Company and 6,125,000 were sold by certain selling stockholders.
Net proceeds to the Company of approximately $34.6 million
were used to repay outstanding indebtedness.
On August 23, 2004, the underwriters, pursuant to their
overallotment option, purchased an additional
1,034,500 shares of common stock resulting in net proceeds
of approximately $12.6 million to the Company, which was used to
further reduce outstanding indebtedness and for general
corporate purposes.
|
|
2. |
Significant Accounting Policies |
Principles of Consolidation The accompanying
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
41
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash
equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with an
original maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are
stated at cost, which approximates fair value.
Inventories Inventories are valued at the
lower of first-in, first-out (FIFO) cost or market.
Cost includes applicable material, labor and overhead.
Inventories consisted of the following as of December 31
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Raw materials
|
|
$ |
21,664 |
|
|
$ |
27,645 |
|
Work in process
|
|
|
1,781 |
|
|
|
2,111 |
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
6,222 |
|
|
|
7,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
29,667 |
|
|
$ |
36,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory quantities on-hand are regularly reviewed, and where
necessary, provisions for excess and obsolete inventory are
recorded based primarily on the Companys estimated
production requirements driven by current market volumes. Excess
and obsolete provisions may vary by product depending upon
future potential use of the product.
Property, Plant and Equipment Property, plant
and equipment are recorded at cost. For financial reporting
purposes, depreciation is provided using the straight-line
method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and improvements
|
|
|
15 to 40 years |
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
3 to 20 years |
|
Tools and dies
|
|
|
5 years |
|
Computer hardware and software
|
|
|
3 years |
|
Accelerated depreciation methods are used for tax reporting
purposes.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred.
Major betterments and improvements which extend the useful life
of the related item are capitalized and depreciated. The cost
and accumulated depreciation of property, plant and equipment
retired or otherwise disposed of are removed from the related
accounts, and any residual values after considering proceeds are
charged or credited to income.
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets, which provides a single accounting model for
impairment of long-lived assets. The Company had no impairments
during 2002, 2003, or 2004.
Other Assets Other assets principally consist
of debt financing costs of approximately $1.2 million at
December 31, 2003 and $2.0 million at
December 31, 2004, which are being amortized over the term
of the related obligations.
Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of
acquisition purchase price over the fair value of net assets
acquired, which prior to the adoption on January 1, 2002,
of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Intangible Assets,
was being amortized on a straight-line basis over
40 years. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and
intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized,
but reviewed annually, or more frequently if impairment
indicators arise. Separable intangible assets that are not
deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized
over their useful lives, but with no maximum life.
Upon adoption of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2002,
the Company completed step one of the transitional goodwill
impairment test, using a combination of valuation techniques,
including the discounted cash flow approach and the market
multiple approach, for each of its reporting units.
42
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Upon completion of the required assessments under
SFAS No. 142, it was determined that the fair market
value of its North America reporting unit was lower than its
book value, resulting in a transitional impairment charge of
approximately $51.6 million in 2002. The write-off was
recorded as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting, net
of tax benefit of $9.3 million related to the tax benefit
on the deductible portion of the goodwill, in the Companys
consolidated statement of operations for the year ended
December 31, 2002. The Company will also perform impairment
tests annually and whenever events or circumstances occur
indicating that goodwill or other intangible assets might be
impaired. Based upon the Companys assessments performed
during 2004, no impairment of goodwill was deemed to have
occurred.
The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years
ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, for the Companys
reporting units, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
North | |
|
All Other | |
|
|
|
|
America | |
|
Countries | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
60,294 |
|
|
$ |
20,330 |
|
|
$ |
80,624 |
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
2,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003
|
|
|
60,294 |
|
|
|
22,578 |
|
|
|
82,872 |
|
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
1,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
60,294 |
|
|
$ |
24,421 |
|
|
$ |
84,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-term Liabilities Other long-term
liabilities consisted of the following as of December 31
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Pension liability
|
|
$ |
3,609 |
|
|
$ |
4,662 |
|
Facility closure and consolidation costs
|
|
|
932 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Forward contracts
|
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement medical benefit plan
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
Loss contracts
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
2,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,549 |
|
|
$ |
8,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes
revenue as its products are shipped from its facilities to its
customers which is when title passes to the customer for
substantially all sales. In certain circumstances, the Company
may be committed under existing agreements to supply product to
its customers at selling prices that are not sufficient to cover
the direct cost to produce such product. In such situations, the
Company records a liability for the estimated future amount of
such losses. Such losses are recognized at the time that the
loss is probable and reasonably estimable and are recorded at
the minimum amount necessary to fulfill the Companys
obligations to its customers. The estimated amounts of such
losses were approximately $1.5 million at December 31,
2003 and $0.6 million at December 31, 2004. These
amounts are recorded within accrued liabilities and other
long-term liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Warranty The Company is subject to warranty
claims for products that fail to perform as expected due to
design or manufacturing deficiencies. Customers continue to
require their outside suppliers to guarantee or warrant their
products and bear the cost of repair or replacement of such
products. Depending on the terms under which the Company
supplies products to its customers, a customer may hold the
Company responsible for some or all of the repair or replacement
costs of defective products,
43
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
when the product supplied did not perform as represented. The
Companys policy is to reserve for estimated future
customer warranty costs based on historical trends and current
economic factors. The following presents a summary of the
warranty provision for the years ended December 31 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$ |
2,600 |
|
|
$ |
1,999 |
|
|
Additional provisions recorded
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
1,813 |
|
|
Deduction for payments made
|
|
|
(1,420 |
) |
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of year
|
|
$ |
1,999 |
|
|
$ |
2,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes The Company accounts for income
taxes following the provisions of SFAS No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, which requires recognition
of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future
tax consequences of events that have been included in the
financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred
tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the
difference between the financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities using currently enacted tax rates.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) The Company
follows the provisions of SFAS No. 130, Reporting
Comprehensive Income, which established standards for
reporting and display of comprehensive income and its
components. Comprehensive income reflects the change in equity
of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and
other events and circumstances from nonowner sources. For the
Company, comprehensive income (loss) represents net income
(loss) adjusted for foreign currency translation adjustments,
minimum pension liability and the deferred gain (loss) on
certain derivative instruments utilized to hedge certain of the
Companys interest rate exposures. In accordance with
SFAS No. 130, the Company has chosen to disclose
comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of
stockholders investment. The components of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following as
of December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$ |
3,172 |
|
|
$ |
5,228 |
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
(2,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,323 |
|
|
$ |
2,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities The Company follows the provisions of
SFAS No. 133, Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, as amended, which requires every derivative
instrument, including certain derivative instruments embedded in
other contracts, to be recorded in the balance sheet as either
an asset or liability measured at its fair value.
SFAS No. 133 requires that changes in the
derivatives fair value be recognized currently in earnings
unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special
accounting for qualifying hedges allows a derivatives
gains or losses to offset related results on the hedged item in
the statement of operations and requires that a company formally
document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions
that receive hedge accounting. In accordance with
SFAS No. 133, the Company recorded the fair value of
the interest rate collar and interest rate swaps described in
Note 6 as a liability at December 31, 2002, with an
offsetting adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income
(loss), as the interest rate collar and interest rate swaps were
cash flow hedges. The interest rate collar and interest rate
swap contracts were cancelled or expired at various dates
through the end of 2003.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments At
December 31, 2004, the Companys financial instruments
consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, accrued liabilities and long-term debt, unless
otherwise noted. The carrying value of these instruments
approximates fair value as a
44
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
result of the short duration of such instruments or due to the
variability of the interest cost associated with such
instruments, except as disclosed in Note 6.
Foreign Currency Translation The functional
currency of the Company is the U.S. dollar. Assets and
liabilities of the Companys foreign operations are
translated using the year-end rates of exchange. Results of
operations are translated using the average rates prevailing
throughout the period. Translation gains or losses are
accumulated as a separate component of stockholders
investment.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting
period. The more significant estimates are used for such items
as allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves,
warranty, pension and post retirement benefit liabilities,
contingent liabilities, goodwill impairment and depreciable
lives of property and equipment. Ultimate results could differ
from those estimates.
Foreign Currency Forward Exchange Contracts
The Company uses forward exchange contracts to hedge certain of
its foreign currency transaction exposures of its foreign
operations. The Company estimates its projected revenues and
purchases in certain foreign currencies or locations, and will
hedge a portion or all of the anticipated long or short
position. The contracts typically run from three months up to
three years. These contracts are marked-to-market and the fair
value is included in assets (liabilities) in the
consolidated balance sheets, with the offsetting noncash gain or
loss included in the consolidated statements of operations. The
Company does not hold or issue foreign exchange options or
forward contracts for trading purposes. The following table
summarizes the notional amount of the Companys open
foreign exchange contracts at December 31, 2004 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
Local Currency | |
|
|
|
U.S. $ Equivalent | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
U.S. $ Equivalent | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Commitments to buy (sell) currencies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
$ |
(192 |
) |
|
$ |
(192 |
) |
|
Eurodollar
|
|
|
54,910 |
|
|
|
74,543 |
|
|
|
76,617 |
|
|
Swedish krona
|
|
|
21,250 |
|
|
|
3,141 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
3,875,000 |
|
|
|
42,708 |
|
|
|
40,087 |
|
|
Australian dollar
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
|
3,316 |
|
|
|
3,295 |
|
The difference between the U.S. $ equivalent and
U.S. $ equivalent fair value of approximately
$0.5 million is included in other assets in the
consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In
December 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 132R, a
revision to SFAS No. 132, Employers
Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement
Benefits. SFAS No. 132R does not change the
measurement or recognition related to pension and other
postretirement plans required by SFAS No. 87,
Employers Accounting for Pensions,
SFAS No. 88, Employers Accounting for
Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans
and for Termination Benefits, and SFAS No. 106,
Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions, and retains the disclosure requirements
contained in SFAS No. 132. SFAS No. 132R
requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations,
cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit
pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans.
SFAS No. 132R is effective for financial statements
with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003, with the
exception of disclosure requirements related to foreign plans
and estimated future benefit payments which are effective for
fiscal years ending after June 15, 2004. The Company has
included the required disclosures in Note 12 to the
45
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
consolidated financial statements. The adoption of
SFAS No. 132R did not impact the Companys
consolidated balance sheet or results of operations.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151,
Inventory Costs. This Statement requires that abnormal amounts
of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and spoilage
be recognized as current-period charges. The Statement also
requires that fixed production overhead be allocated to
conversion costs based on the normal capacity of the production
facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for inventory
costs incurred by the Company beginning in fiscal year 2006. The
Company is in the process of determining the impact adoption of
this Statement will have on its results of operations.
In December 2004, the FASB revised SFAS No. 123, Share
Based Payment (SFAS No 123R). This Statement supercedes
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, which resulted in no
stock-based employee compensation cost related to stock options
if the options granted had an exercise price equal to the market
value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant.
SFAS No. 123R requires recognition of employee
services provided in exchange for a share-based payment based on
the grant date fair market value. The Company is required to
adopt SFAS No. 123R as of July 1, 2005. As of the
effective date, this Statement applies to all new awards issued
as well as awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled.
Additionally, for stock-based awards issued prior to the
effective date, compensation cost attributable to future
services will be recognized as the remaining service is
rendered. The Company may also elect to restate prior periods by
applying a modified retrospective method to periods prior to the
effective date. The Company is in the process of determining
which method of adoption it will elect as well as the potential
impact on its consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following as of
December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Compensation and benefits
|
|
$ |
7,121 |
|
|
$ |
8,041 |
|
Warranty costs
|
|
|
1,999 |
|
|
|
2,408 |
|
Product liability
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
Interest
|
|
|
1,341 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Income and other taxes
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
2,215 |
|
Facility closure and consolidation costs
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
278 |
|
Freight
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
Loss contracts
|
|
|
1,010 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
Other
|
|
|
2,914 |
|
|
|
4,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16,356 |
|
|
$ |
18,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Stockholders Investment |
Common Stock The authorized capital stock of
the Company consists of 30,000,000 shares of common stock
with a par value of $0.01 per share. In August, 2004, the
Company reclassified all of its existing classes of common
stock, which effectively resulted in a 38.991-to-one stock
split. The stock split has been reflected in the share and per
share amounts for all periods presented.
Preferred Stock The authorized capital stock
of the Company consists of 5,000,000 shares of preferred
stock with a par value of $0.01 per share, with no shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2004.
46
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Earnings Per Share Basic earnings (loss) per
share was computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the year. In
accordance with SFAS No. 128, an entity that reports a
discontinued operation, an extraordinary item, or the cumulative
effect of an accounting change in a period shall use income from
continuing operations, (before the cumulative effect of an
accounting change) as the control number in determining whether
potential common shares are dilutive or antidilutive. As a
result, diluted earnings (loss) per share, and all other diluted
per share amounts presented, were computed utilizing the same
number of potential common shares used in computing the diluted
per share amount for income before cumulative effect on change
in accounting, regardless if those amounts were antidilutive to
their respective basic per share amounts. Diluted earnings per
share for 2002, 2003 and 2004 includes the effects of
outstanding stock options and warrants using the treasury stock
method (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders
basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(45,480 |
) |
|
$ |
3,964 |
|
|
$ |
17,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
13,827 |
|
|
|
13,779 |
|
|
|
15,429 |
|
Dilutive effect of outstanding stock options after application
of the treasury stock method
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive shares outstanding
|
|
|
13,931 |
|
|
|
13,883 |
|
|
|
15,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(3.29 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earning (loss) per share
|
|
$ |
(3.26 |
) |
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options and Warrants In 1998, the
Company issued options to purchase 57,902 shares of
common stock at $9.43 per share, which are exercisable
through December 2008, in connection with an acquisition. None
of the initially granted options have been exercised as of
December 31, 2004. The options were granted at an exercise
price determined to be at or above fair value on the date of
grant. In addition, the Company had outstanding warrants to
purchase 136,023 shares of common stock at
$3.42 per share, which were exercised in conjunction with
the Companys initial public offering in August 2004.
In May 2004, the Company granted options to
purchase 910,869 shares of common stock at
$5.54 per share. These options have a ten year term, with
50% of such options being immediately exercisable and the
remaining 50% becoming exercisable ratably on June 30, 2005
and June 30, 2006. During June 2004, the Company modified
the terms of these options to be 100% vested immediately. The
Company recorded a noncash compensation charge of
$10.1 million, equal to the difference between $5.54 and
the estimated fair market value.
In October 2004, the Company granted options to
purchase 598,950 shares of common stock at
$15.84 per share. The options were granted at an exercise
price determined to be at or above fair value on the date of
grant. These options have a ten year life and vest equally over
a 3 year period. Had compensation cost for these plans been
determined as required under SFAS No. 123, the impact
to 2004 net income would have been approximately
$0.1 million and basic and diluted earnings per share would
remain unchanged.
Repurchase of Common Stock During 2002 and
2004, the Company repurchased 64,687 and 50,874 shares of
common stock from certain stockholders at an average price of
$3.24 and $4.78 per share, respectively.
Dividends The Company has not declared or
paid any cash dividends in the past. The Companys credit
agreement prohibits the payment of cash dividends.
47
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
5. |
Restructuring and Integration |
Restructuring In 2000, the Company recorded a
$5.6 million restructuring charge as part of its cost and
efficiency initiatives, closing two manufacturing facilities,
two administrative centers, and reorganizing its manufacturing
and administrative functions. Approximately $1.7 million of
the charge was related to employee severance and associated
benefits for the 225 terminated employees, approximately
$2.6 million related to lease and other contractual
commitments associated with the facilities, and approximately
$1.3 million of asset impairments related to the write-down
of assets. All employees were terminated by 2001. The
contractual commitments continue through mid-2005.
In 2001, the Company continued its cost and efficiency
initiatives and closed a third manufacturing facility. Of the
total $0.4 million restructuring charge, approximately
$0.1 million related to employee severance and associated
benefits for 77 employees and approximately $0.3 million
related to lease and other contractual commitments associated
with the facility. All employees were terminated by 2002. The
contractual commitments continue through 2008.
A summary of restructuring activities for the years ended
December 31, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Exit | |
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
and Other | |
|
|
|
|
Costs | |
|
Contractual Costs | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
1,177 |
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
Usage/cash payments
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
Usage/cash payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integration In connection with the
acquisitions of Bostrom plc and the predecessor to CVS, facility
consolidation plans were designed and implemented to reduce the
cost structure of the Company and to better integrate the
acquired operations. Purchase liabilities recorded as part of
the acquisitions included approximately $3.3 million for
costs associated with the shutdown and consolidation of certain
acquired facilities and severance and other contractual costs.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had principally completed
its actions under these plans, other than certain contractual
commitments, which continue through 2008. Summarized below is
the activity related to these actions (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Exit | |
|
|
|
|
Employee | |
|
and Other | |
|
|
|
|
Costs | |
|
Contractual Costs | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
Usage/cash payments
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
|
620 |
|
|
Usage/cash payments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Debt consisted of the following at December 31 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Revolving credit facilities, bore interest at a weighted average
rate of 5.9% as of December 31, 2003 and 7.0% as of
December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
26,530 |
|
|
$ |
4,566 |
|
Term loans, with principal and interest payable quarterly, bore
interest at a weighted average rate of 5.2% as of
December 31, 2003 and 6.5% as of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
80,195 |
|
|
|
42,857 |
|
Sterling loan notes
|
|
|
3,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
6,517 |
|
|
|
6,502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116,435 |
|
|
|
53,925 |
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
15,231 |
|
|
|
4,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
101,204 |
|
|
$ |
49,041 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future maturities of debt as of December 31, 2004 are as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
4,884 |
|
2006
|
|
|
12,226 |
|
2007
|
|
|
7,094 |
|
2008
|
|
|
8,504 |
|
2009
|
|
|
14,081 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
7,136 |
|
Credit Agreement The Companys senior
credit agreement consists of a revolving credit facility of
$40 million and term loans of $65 million, of which
approximately $40.0 million expires in July 2009 and
approximately $65.0 million expires in July 2010. Quarterly
repayments are required under the term loans. Borrowings bear
interest at various rates plus a margin based on certain
financial ratios of the Company, as defined. The senior credit
agreement contain various restrictive covenants, including
limiting indebtedness, investments and cash dividends, and also
requires the maintenance of certain financial ratios, including
fixed charge coverage and funded debt to EBITDA. Compliance with
respect to these covenants as of December 31, 2004 was
achieved. Borrowings under the senior credit agreements are
secured by specifically identified assets of the Company,
comprising, in total, substantially all assets of the Company.
In addition, at December 31, 2004 the Company has
outstanding letters of credit of approximately $2.8 million
expiring through April 2008.
The Credit Agreement provides the Company with the ability to
denominate a portion of its borrowings in foreign currencies. As
of December 31, 2004, $29.6 million of the term loans
were denominated in U.S. dollars and $4.6 million of
the revolving credit facility borrowings and $13.2 million
of the term loans were denominated in British pounds sterling.
During March 2003, in conjunction with the Companys merger
with CVS, the Company amended its credit agreement. Based on the
provisions of EITF 96-19, Debtors Accounting for a
Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments, the Company
wrote off the unamortized cost of its old and new fees paid to
the financial institution and third party fees related to the
then existing credit agreement as a loss on extinguishment of
debt. The third party fees related to amended credit agreement
were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the
amended credit agreement.
49
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Sterling Loan Notes In conjunction with the
acquisition of Bostrom plc, Sterling loan notes were issued in
exchange for certain shares acquired by the Company. The notes
bore interest at LIBOR and were due December 31, 2004. The
Sterling loan notes were fully redeemed in November of 2004.
In June 2001, Onex Corporation, the controlling stockholder of
the Company, and its affiliates (Onex) loaned the
Company $7 million pursuant to a five-year promissory note.
Interest, which was deferred in 2002 and 2003 and through
August 10, 2004 was prime plus 1.25%. The promissory note
was collateralized by all assets of the Company and its
subsidiaries and was subject to an intercreditor agreement
between the Company, certain of its lenders, and Onex. This loan
plus accrued interest was repaid on August 10, 2004 with
proceeds from the Companys initial public offering.
In September 2002, the Company issued subordinated debt in the
amount of $2.5 million to its principal stockholders,
including Onex. The debt bore interest at 12.0% and would have
matured on September 30, 2006. Accrued interest over the
term of the obligation was payable in kind (PIK) at
maturity. Interest accrued during 2004 and added to principal
was approximately $0.2 million. This debt plus PIK interest
was repaid on August 10, 2004 with proceeds from the
Companys initial public offering.
Pretax income before the cumulative effect of change in
accounting consisted of the following for the years ended
December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Domestic
|
|
$ |
7,795 |
|
|
$ |
3,966 |
|
|
$ |
17,996 |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
3,590 |
|
|
|
5,265 |
|
|
|
5,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
11,385 |
|
|
$ |
9,231 |
|
|
$ |
23,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of income taxes computed at the statutory rates
to the reported income tax provision for the years ended
December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Federal provision at statutory rate
|
|
$ |
3,871 |
|
|
$ |
3,139 |
|
|
$ |
8,136 |
|
U.S. tax on foreign income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,411 |
|
|
|
779 |
|
Foreign provision in excess (less) than U.S. tax rate
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
563 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
State taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
Other
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
307 |
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
5,235 |
|
|
$ |
5,267 |
|
|
$ |
6,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes for the years ended
December 31 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current
|
|
$ |
968 |
|
|
$ |
3,968 |
|
|
$ |
5,141 |
|
Deferred
|
|
|
4,267 |
|
|
|
1,299 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
$ |
5,235 |
|
|
$ |
5,267 |
|
|
$ |
6,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
A summary of deferred income tax assets and liabilities is as
follows as of December 31 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Current deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$ |
435 |
|
|
$ |
457 |
|
|
|
Inventory
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
Warranty costs
|
|
|
1,152 |
|
|
|
677 |
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
Other accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes
|
|
|
2,415 |
|
|
|
1,455 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred assets
|
|
$ |
5,995 |
|
|
$ |
8,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncurrent deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization lives and methods
|
|
$ |
1,306 |
|
|
$ |
(1,837 |
) |
|
|
Pension obligation
|
|
|
1,655 |
|
|
|
1,906 |
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
4,834 |
|
|
|
3,730 |
|
|
|
Original issue discount
|
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(3,808 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
1,694 |
|
|
|
Other accruals not currently deductible for tax purposes
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net noncurrent deferred tax assets
|
|
$ |
9,011 |
|
|
$ |
5,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately
$8.3 million of federal and $23.1 million of state net
operating loss carryforwards related to the Companys
U.S. operations. Utilization of these losses is subject to
the tax laws of the applicable tax jurisdiction and the
Companys legal organizational structure, and may be
limited by the ability of certain subsidiaries to generate
taxable income in the associated tax jurisdiction. The
Companys net operating loss carryforwards expire beginning
in 2015 and continue through 2023. In 2004, it was determined
that the valuation allowance in place pertaining to net
operating losses at December 31, 2003 was no longer
necessary due to the likelihood of future recovery. The deferred
income tax provision consists of the change in the deferred
income tax assets, adjusted for the impact of the tax benefit on
the cumulative effect of the change in accounting and the tax
impact of certain of the other comprehensive income (loss)
items. No provision has been made for U.S. income taxes
related to undistributed earnings of the Companys foreign
subsidiaries that are intended to be permanently reinvested.
The Company operates in multiple jurisdictions and is routinely
under audit by federal, state, and international tax
authorities. Exposures exist related to various filing positions
which may require an extended period of time to resolve and may
result in income tax adjustments by the taxing authorities.
Reserves for these potential exposures have been established
which represent managements best estimate of the probable
adjustments. On a quarterly basis, management evaluates the
reserve amounts in light of any additional information and
adjusts the reserve balances as necessary to reflect the best
estimate of the probable outcomes. Management believes that the
Company has established the appropriate reserve for these
estimated exposures. However, actual results may differ from
these estimates. The resolution of these matters in a particular
future period could have an impact on the Companys
consolidated statement of operations and provision for income
taxes.
51
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The Company follows the provisions of SFAS No. 131,
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. The Company is organized in two divisions based
on the products that each division offers to OEM customers. Each
division reports their results of operations, submits budgets,
and makes capital expenditures requests to their operating
decision-making group. This group consists of the president and
chief executive officer, the general managers of the divisions,
and the chief financial officer. The Companys operating
segments have been aggregated into one reportable segment, as
the Company believes it meets the aggregation criteria of
SFAS No. 131. The Companys divisions, each with
a separate general manager, are dedicated to providing
components and systems to OEM customers. Each of the
divisions demonstrates similar economic performance, mainly
driven by production volumes of the customers which they
service. All of the Companys operations use similar
manufacturing techniques and utilize common cost saving tools.
These techniques include a continuous improvement program
designed to reduce the Companys overall cost base and to
enable the Company to better handle heavy truck and specialty
transportation market volume fluctuations.
The following table presents revenues and long-lived assets for
each of the geographic areas in which the Company operates (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Long-lived | |
|
|
|
Long-lived | |
|
|
|
Long-lived | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Assets | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Assets | |
|
Revenues | |
|
Assets | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
North America
|
|
$ |
229,706 |
|
|
$ |
31,977 |
|
|
$ |
201,132 |
|
|
$ |
28,787 |
|
|
$ |
272,460 |
|
|
$ |
26,918 |
|
All other countries
|
|
|
68,972 |
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
86,447 |
|
|
|
4,705 |
|
|
|
107,985 |
|
|
|
6,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
298,678 |
|
|
$ |
35,024 |
|
|
$ |
287,579 |
|
|
$ |
33,492 |
|
|
$ |
380,445 |
|
|
$ |
32,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues are attributed to geographic locations based on the
location of product production.
The following is a summary composition by product category of
the Companys revenues (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Seats and seating systems
|
|
$ |
136,632 |
|
|
$ |
148,916 |
|
|
$ |
202,469 |
|
Trim systems and components
|
|
|
96,000 |
|
|
|
76,864 |
|
|
|
106,172 |
|
Mirrors, wipers and controls
|
|
|
66,046 |
|
|
|
61,799 |
|
|
|
71,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
298,678 |
|
|
$ |
287,579 |
|
|
$ |
380,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Customers that accounted for a significant portion of
consolidated revenues for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2004 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
PACCAR
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
Freightliner
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
International
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Volvo/ Mack
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Caterpillar
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
As of December 31, 2003 and 2004, receivables from these
customers represented 49% and 47% of total receivables,
respectively.
|
|
11. |
Commitments and Contingencies |
401(k) Plans The Company sponsors various
401(k) employee savings plans covering all eligible employees,
as defined. Eligible employees can contribute on a pretax basis
to the plan. In accordance with the terms of the 401(k) plans,
the Company elects to match a certain percentage of the
participants contributions to the plans, as defined. The
Company recognized expense associated with these plans of
approximately $380,000, $291,000 and $463,000 in 2002, 2003 and
2004, respectively.
Leases The Company leases office and
manufacturing space and certain equipment under operating lease
agreements that require it to pay maintenance, insurance, taxes
and other expenses in addition to annual rentals. Of these lease
rentals, approximately $0.5 million are included in the
facility closure and consolidation cost reserve. The anticipated
future lease costs are based in part on certain assumptions and
estimates with respect to sublease income and the Company will
continue to monitor these costs to determine if the estimates
need to be revised in the future. Lease expense was
approximately $3.9 million, $5.1 million and
$5.6 million in 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. Future
minimum annual rental commitments at December 31, 2004
under these leases are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
5,082 |
|
2006
|
|
|
3,910 |
|
2007
|
|
|
3,230 |
|
2008
|
|
|
2,939 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
534 |
|
Litigation The Company is subject to various
legal actions and claims incidental to its business, including
those arising out of alleged defects, product warranties,
employment-related matters and environmental matters. Management
believes that the Company maintains adequate insurance to cover
these claims. The Company has established reserves for issues
that are probable and estimatable in amounts management believes
are adequate to cover reasonable adverse judgments not covered
by insurance. Based upon the information available to management
and discussions with legal counsel, it is the opinion of
management that the ultimate outcome of the various legal
actions and claims that are incidental to the Companys
business will not have a material adverse impact on the
consolidated financial
53
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company;
however, such matters are subject to many uncertainties, and the
outcomes of individual matters are not predictable with
assurance.
|
|
12. |
Defined Benefit Plan and Postretirement Benefits |
The Company sponsors a defined benefit plan that covers certain
hourly and salaried employees in the United Kingdom. The
Companys policy is to make annual contributions to the
plan to fund the normal cost as required by local regulations.
In addition, the Company has an informal postretirement medical
benefit plan for certain retirees and their dependents of the
U.S. operations, and has recorded a liability for its
estimated obligation under this plan. The postretirement medical
benefit plan covers certain former employees and is no longer
available to current employees.
The change in benefit obligation, plan assets and funded status
as of and for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
Pension Plan | |
|
Retirement | |
|
Pension Plan | |
|
Retirement | |
|
|
in Which | |
|
Benefits | |
|
in Which | |
|
Benefits | |
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
Other | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Other | |
|
|
Benefits | |
|
Than | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Than | |
|
|
Exceed Assets | |
|
Pensions | |
|
Exceed Assets | |
|
Pensions | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation Beginning of year
|
|
$ |
24,348 |
|
|
$ |
847 |
|
|
$ |
29,897 |
|
|
$ |
834 |
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
2,628 |
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
Exchange rate changes
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
|
29,897 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
37,576 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets Beginning of year
|
|
|
17,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
3,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Plan participants contributions
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1,015 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(996 |
) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
Exchange rate changes
|
|
|
1,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
22,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,397 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
(7,056 |
) |
|
|
(834 |
) |
|
|
(9,179 |
) |
|
|
(687 |
) |
|
Unrecognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
6,617 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
8,407 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
Adjustment to recognize minimum liability
|
|
|
(3,170 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit cost
|
|
$ |
(3,609 |
) |
|
$ |
(620 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,662 |
) |
|
$ |
(601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2003 and 2004, the Company was required to
record a minimum pension liability of approximately
$3.6 million and $4.7 million, respectively, which is
included in other long-term liabilities and accumulated other
comprehensive loss, net of tax, in the consolidated financial
statements. The
54
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
accumulated benefit obligation for the pension plan was
$33.8 million at December 31, 2004 and
$29.1 million at December 31, 2003.
The following weighted-average assumptions were used to account
for the plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
|
Post- | |
|
|
|
|
retirement | |
|
|
|
retirement | |
|
|
|
|
Benefits | |
|
|
|
Benefits | |
|
|
Pension | |
|
Other Than | |
|
Pension | |
|
Other Than | |
|
|
Benefits | |
|
Pensions | |
|
Benefits | |
|
Pensions | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
|
|
5.75 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
7.50 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
3.00 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
3.20 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
For measurement purposes, a 10% annual rate of increase in the
per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for
2005. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5.0% through
2010 and remain constant thereafter. Assumed health care cost
trend rates can have a significant effect on the amounts
reported for postretirement medical benefit plans. A one
percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates
would not have had a material impact on total service and
interest cost components or on the postretirement benefit
obligation.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement | |
|
|
|
|
Benefits | |
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
Other Than Pensions | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Service cost
|
|
$ |
1,048 |
|
|
$ |
1,134 |
|
|
$ |
1,213 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
1,640 |
|
|
|
1,879 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(1,548 |
) |
|
|
(1,451 |
) |
|
|
(1,879 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized actuarial loss
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
1,080 |
|
|
$ |
1,708 |
|
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average asset allocations of the Companys
U.K. pension assets at December 31, 2003 and 2004, by asset
category, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Equity securities
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
Debt securities
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Other
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
The Company employs a total return investment approach whereby a
mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to
maximize the long-term return of plan assets for a prudent level
of risk. The intent of this strategy is to minimize plan
expenses by outperforming plan liabilities over the long run.
Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of
plan liabilities, plan funded status, and corporate financial
condition. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend
of equity and fixed income investments. Furthermore, equity
investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks
as well as growth, value, and small and large capitalizations.
Other assets such as real estate, private equity, and hedge
funds are used judiciously to enhance long-term returns while
improving portfolio diversification. Derivatives may be used to
gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner;
55
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
however, derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio
beyond the market value of the underlying investments.
Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis
through annual liability measurements, periodic asset/liability
studies, and quarterly investment portfolio reviews. The Company
expects to contribute $1.2 million to its pension plan and
$0.1 million to its postretirement medical benefit plan in
2005.
The following table presents the Companys projected
benefit payments as of December 31, 2004 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Pension | |
|
Post-Retirement | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2005
|
|
$ |
570 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
2006
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
2007
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
2008
|
|
|
840 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
2009
|
|
|
974 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
7,125 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
13. |
Related Party Transactions |
In addition to the items discussed in Note 7, the following
related party transactions occurred during the three years ended
December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
The Company made payments of $1.0 million,
$1.6 million and $1.1 million to Hidden Creek
Industries, an affiliate of the Company, for financing and
acquisition-related services in 2002, 2003 and 2004,
respectively. These services are included in selling, general
and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of
operations. |
|
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company
recognized revenues of approximately $1.8 million for the
sale of design services to ASC, an affiliate of the Company. |
|
|
|
In 2001, Onex acquired a one-third interest in the
Companys $66.0 million senior credit facility. Total
interest expense related to the portion of this senior credit
facility owned by Onex was approximately $1.0 million,
$0.9 million and $0.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004, respectively. This debt
plus accrued interest was repaid on August 10, 2004 in
conjunction with the Companys initial public offering and
the Companys new $105 million senior credit facility. |
56
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
14. Quarterly Financial Data
(Unaudited):
The following is a condensed summary of actual quarterly results
of operations for 2003 and 2004 (in thousands, except per share
amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic | |
|
Diluted | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Earnings | |
|
|
|
|
Gross | |
|
Operating | |
|
Income | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
(Loss) Per | |
|
|
Revenues | |
|
Profit | |
|
Income | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Per Share | |
|
Share(a) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$ |
66,383 |
|
|
$ |
10,155 |
|
|
$ |
4,149 |
|
|
$ |
(1,699 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
Second
|
|
|
71,408 |
|
|
|
12,151 |
|
|
|
6,302 |
|
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
Third
|
|
|
71,707 |
|
|
|
13,081 |
|
|
|
7,277 |
|
|
|
2,734 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
Fourth
|
|
|
78,081 |
|
|
|
14,307 |
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
$ |
85,990 |
|
|
$ |
15,487 |
|
|
$ |
7,954 |
|
|
$ |
5,549 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
Second
|
|
|
94,491 |
|
|
|
16,855 |
|
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.06 |
)(b) |
Third
|
|
|
98,713 |
|
|
|
18,229 |
|
|
|
11,289 |
|
|
|
6,846 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
Fourth
|
|
|
101,252 |
|
|
|
20,178 |
|
|
|
12,453 |
|
|
|
5,931 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
(a) See Note 4 for discussion on the computation of
diluted shares outstanding.
|
|
(b) |
Includes $10,125 noncash compensation charge related to
modification of vesting of options issued in May 2004. |
The sum of the per share amounts for the quarters does not equal
the total for the year due to the application of the treasury
stock method.
On February 7, 2004 the Company acquired substantially all
of the assets and liabilities related to Mayflower Vehicle
Systems North American Commercial Vehicle Operations
(MVS) for cash consideration of $107.5 million.
MVS, whose products include frames and assemblies, sleeper boxes
and other structural components, was the only non-captive
producer of complete truck cabs for the commercial vehicle
sector and has full service engineering and development
capabilities. Products include cab frames and assemblies,
sleeper boxes and other structural components. MVS customers
include International, Volvo/ Mack and Freightliner. The
acquisition of MVS adds manufacturing facilities in Norwalk and
Shadyside, Ohio and Kings Mountain, North Carolina and a
technical facility in the Detroit, Michigan area to the
Companys operations. For the year ended December 31,
2004, MVS recorded revenues of approximately $207 million
and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization of approximately $25 million. The acquisition
of MVS was financed by an increase and amendment to our existing
senior credit facility increasing our revolving credit facility
from $40 million to $75 million and term loans from
$65 million to $145 million.
57
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Commercial Vehicle
Group, Inc.
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) (formerly Bostrom Holding, Inc., a Delaware
corporation) as of December 31, 2003 and 2004, and for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004,
and have issued our report thereon dated March 3, 2005
(which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an
explanatory paragraph relating to the change in the
Companys method of accounting for goodwill and other
intangible assets); such consolidated financial statements and
report are included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Our audits
also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries included in
Item 15. This consolidated financial statement schedule is
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 3, 2005
58
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
SCHEDULE II: VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
The transactions in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the
years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$ |
4,103 |
|
|
$ |
2,309 |
|
|
$ |
2,530 |
|
Provisions
|
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
1,529 |
|
|
|
2,448 |
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(1,454 |
) |
|
|
(1,424 |
) |
|
|
(2,390 |
) |
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of the year
|
|
$ |
2,309 |
|
|
$ |
2,530 |
|
|
$ |
2,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Purchase Liabilities Recorded in Conjunction with
Acquisitions:
The transactions in the purchase liabilities account recorded in
conjunction with acquisitions for the years ended
December 31, 2002, 2003, and 2004 were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$ |
1,868 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(1,178 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of the year
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility Closure and Consolidation Costs:
The transactions in the facility closure and consolidation costs
account for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2003, and
2004 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Balance Beginning of the year
|
|
$ |
2,197 |
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
787 |
|
Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilizations
|
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
(509 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance End of the year
|
|
$ |
1,275 |
|
|
$ |
787 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Item 9. |
Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on
accounting and financial disclosure.
|
|
Item 9A. |
Controls and Procedures |
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we performed
an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation
of our management including the chief executive officer and the
chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our
management, including the chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective. There have been no changes in
internal control over financial reporting during our fourth
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
|
|
Item 9B. |
Other Information |
All information required to be reported on a Form 8-K has
been reported on a Form 8-K.
PART III
|
|
Item 10. |
Directors and executive Officers of the Registrant |
|
|
A. |
Directors of the Registrant |
The information required by Item 10 with respect to the
directors is incorporated herein by reference to the section
labeled Election of Directors which appears in
CVGs 2005 Proxy Statement.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect
to our current directors and executive officers as of
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Principal Position(s) |
|
|
| |
|
|
Scott D. Rued
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Chairman and Director |
Mervin Dunn
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
Donald P. Lorraine
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
Managing Director KAB Seating |
Gerald L. Armstrong
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
President CVG Americas |
James F. Williams
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
Vice President of Human Resources |
Chad M. Utrup
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
David R. Bovee
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Director |
S.A. Johnson
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
Director |
Eric J. Rosen
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
Director |
Richard A. Snell
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
Director |
The following biographies describe the business experience of
our executive officers and directors.
Scott D. Rued has served as a Director since February
2001 and Chairman since April 2002. Since September 2003,
Mr. Rued has served as a Managing Partner of Thayer Capital
Partners. Prior to joining Thayer, Mr. Rued served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Hidden Creek from May
2000 to August 2003. From January 1994 through
April 2000, Mr. Rued served as Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of Hidden Creek.
Mr. Rued is presently the Chairman and a Director of Dura
Automotive Systems, Inc., a manufacturer of driver control
systems, window systems and door systems for the global
automotive industry.
60
Mervin Dunn has served as our President and Chief
Executive Officer since June 2002, and prior thereto served as
the Vice President Manufacturing of Trim Systems, upon his
joining us in October 1999. From 1998 to 1999, Mr. Dunn
served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Bliss
Technologies, a heavy metal stamping company. From 1988 to 1998
Mr. Dunn served in a number of key leadership roles at
Arvin Industries, including Vice President of Operating Systems
(Arvin North America), Vice President of Quality, and President
of Arvin Ride Control. From 1985 to 1988, Mr. Dunn held
several key management positions in engineering and quality
assurance at Johnson Controls Automotive Group, an automotive
trim company, including Division Quality Manager. From 1980 to
1985, Mr. Dunn served in a number of management positions
for engineering and quality departments of Hyster Corporation, a
manufacturer of heavy lift trucks.
Donald P. Lorraine has served as the Managing Director of
KAB Seating since 1989, as Group Operations Director from 1986
to 1989, and as the Factory Manager of KAB Seatings main
manufacturing facility in the United Kingdom from 1983 to 1986.
Prior to joining KAB Seating, Mr. Lorraine served in
several different roles in production management for the
domestic appliance division of Tube Investments, a United
Kingdom engineering company.
Gerald L. Armstrong has served as the
President CVG Americas since March 2003. From July
2002 to March 2003, Mr. Armstrong served as Vice President
and General Manager of National Seating and KAB North America.
Prior to joining us, Mr. Armstrong served from 1995 to 2000
and from 2000 to July 2002 as Vice President and General
Manager, respectively, of Gabriel Ride Control Products, a
manufacturer of shock absorbers and related ride control
products for the automotive and light truck markets, and a
wholly owned subsidiary of ArvinMeritor, Inc. Mr. Armstrong
began his service with ArvinMeritor Inc., a manufacturer of
automotive and commercial vehicle components, modules and
systems in 1987, and served in various positions of increasing
responsibility within its light vehicle original equipment and
aftermarket divisions before starting at Gabriel Ride Control
Products. Prior to 1987, Mr. Armstrong held various
positions of increasing responsibility including Quality
Engineer and Senior Quality Supervisor and Quality Manager with
Schlumberger Industries and Hyster Corporation.
James F. Williams has served as the Vice President of
Human Resources since August 1999. Prior to joining us,
Mr. Williams served as Corporate Vice President of Human
Resources and Administration for SPECO Corporation from January
1996 to August 1999. From April 1984 to January 1996,
Mr. Williams served in various key human resource
management positions in General Electrics Turbine,
Lighting and Semi Conductor business. In addition,
Mr. Williams served as Manager of Labor Relations and
Personnel Services at Mack Trucks Allentown Corporate
location from 1976 to 1984.
Chad M. Utrup has served as the Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer since January 2003, and prior thereto served
as the Vice President of Finance at Trim Systems since 2000.
Prior to joining us in February 1998, Mr. Utrup served as a
project management group member at Electronic Data Systems, a
systems integration and IT support company. While with
Electronic Data Systems, Mr. Utrups responsibilities
included implementing cost recovery and efficiency programs at
various Delphi Automotive Systems support locations.
David R. Bovee has served as a Director since October
2004. He has served as Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Dura Automotive Systems, Inc. since January 2001 and
from November 1990 to May 1997. From May 1997 until January
2001, Mr. Bovee served as Vice President of Business
Development. Mr. Bovee also serves as Assistant Secretary
for Dura. Prior to joining Dura, Mr. Bovee served as Vice
President at Wickes in its Automotive Group from 1987 to 1990.
S.A. (Tony) Johnson has served as a Director
since September 2000. Mr. Johnson served as the Chairman of
Hidden Creek from May 2001 to May 2004 and from 1989 to May 2001
was its Chief Executive Officer and President. Prior to forming
Hidden Creek, Mr. Johnson served from 1985 to 1989 as Chief
Operating Officer of Pentair, Inc., a diversified industrial
company. Mr. Johnson is also Chairman and Director of Tower
Automotive, Inc., and a Director of J.L. French Automotive
Castings, Inc.
61
Eric J. Rosen has served as a Director since August 2004.
Mr. Rosen is Managing Director of Onex Investment Corp., an
affiliate of Onex Corporation, a diversified industrial
corporation, and has held that position since 1994.
Mr. Rosen served as a Vice President of Onex Investment
Corp. from 1989 to 1994. Prior thereto, Mr. Rosen was
employed in the merchant banking group at Kidder,
Peabody & Co. from 1987 to 1989. Mr. Rosen also
currently serves as a Director of J.L. French Automotive
Castings, Inc. and DRS Technologies, Inc.
Richard A. Snell has served as a Director since August
2004. Mr. Snell has served as an Operating Partner at
Thayer Capital Partners since 2003. Prior to joining Thayer,
Mr. Snell served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Federal-Mogul Corporation, an automotive parts manufacturer,
from 1996 to 2000 and as Chief Executive Officer of Tenneco
Automotive, also an automotive parts manufacturer.
Mr. Snell currently serves on the board of Schneider
National, Inc.
There are no family relationships between any of CVGs
executive officers or directors.
|
|
C. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance |
The information required by Item 10 with respect to
compliance with reporting requirements is incorporated herein by
reference to the section labeled Section 16(a)
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance which appears in
CVGs 2005 Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein
by reference to the sections labeled Compensation of
Directors and Executive Compensation which
appear in CVGs 2005 Proxy Statement excluding information
under the headings Compensation Committee Report on
Executive Compensation and Performance Graph.
|
|
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein
by reference to the sections labeled Ownership of CVG
Common Stock and Equity Compensation Plans,
which appear in CVGs 2005 Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
The information required by Item 13 is incorporated herein
by reference to the section labeled Certain Relationships
and Related Transactions which appears in CVGs 2005
Proxy Statement.
|
|
Item 14. |
Principle Accountant Fees and Services |
The information required by Item 14 is incorporated herein
by reference to the section labeled Independent Auditors
Fees which appears in CVGs 2005 Proxy Statement.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15. |
Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on
Form 8-K |
|
|
(a) |
Documents Filed as Part of this Report on Form 10-K |
(1) Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Auditors Report |
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2003 and 2004 |
62
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Investment for the
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 |
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2002, 2003 and 2004 |
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
(2) Financial Statement Schedules:
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Statement Schedule II Valuation and
Qualifying Accounts |
(3) Exhibits: See Exhibit Index
63
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Agreement of Purchase and Sale, dated February 7, 2004, by
and among, CVG Acquisition LLC, Mayflower Vehicle Systems, Inc.,
Mayflower Vehicle Systems Michigan, Inc., Wayne Stamping and
Assembly LLC and Wayne-Orrville Investments LLC. |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the
Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File
No. 000-50890), filed on September 17, 2004). |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Amended and Restated By-laws of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to the Companys quarterly
report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50890), filed
on September 17, 2004). |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
March 28, 2003, by and among Commercial Vehicle Systems
Limited, KAB Seating Limited, National Seating Company,
Commercial Vehicle Systems, Inc., CVS Holdings, Inc., Bostrom
Holding, Inc., the several financial institutions from time to
time party to this agreement (the Lenders), Fleet
National Bank, as an Issuer and Bank of America, N.A., as
administrative agent for the Lenders, Collateral Agent, Swing
Line Lender and an Issuer (incorporated by reference to the
Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of
October 29, 1998, by and among Trim Systems Operating Corp,
Tempress, Inc., Trim Systems, LLC, the financial institutions
from time to time signatory thereto (the Banks) and
Comerica Bank, as agent for the Banks (incorporated by reference
to the Companys registration statement on Form S-1
(File No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Revolving Credit and Term Loan
Agreement, dated as of December 31, 1998, by and among the
lenders signatory thereto, Comerica Bank as agent for the Banks,
Trim Systems Operating Corp., Tempress, Inc. and Trim Systems
LLC (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.4 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement
and Waiver, dated as of November 22, 1999, by and among
U.S. Bank National Association, as co-agent, Bank One,
N.A., as co-agent, Comerica Bank as agent for the Banks, Trim
Systems Operating Corp., Tempress, Inc. and Trim Systems LLC
(incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on
May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Amendment No. 3 to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement
and Waiver, dated as of June 28, 2001, by and among the
lenders signatory thereto, Comerica Bank as agent for the Banks,
Trim Systems Operating Corp., Tempress, Inc. and Trim Systems
LLC (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Assignment and Waiver Agreement, dated as of June 28, 2001,
by and among Trim Systems Operating Corp, Tempress, Inc., Trim
Systems, LLC, U.S. Bank National Association, Bank One, NA,
Comerica Bank, 1363880 Ontario Inc. and J2R Partners II-B,
LLC (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Amendment No. 4 to Revolving Credit and Term Loan
Agreement, dated as of November 13, 2002, by and among the
lenders signatory thereto, Comerica Bank as agent for the Banks,
Trim Systems Operating Corp., Tempress, Inc. and Trim Systems
LLC (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Amendment No. 5 to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement
and Waiver dated as of February 2004, by and among the lenders
signatory thereto, Comerica Bank as agent for the Banks, Trim
Systems Operating Corp., Tempress, Inc. and Trim Systems LLC,
(incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on
May 21, 2004). |
64
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement, dated as of
August 10, 2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group,
Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time parties
thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties hereto,
U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks, as
administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of the
banks, as syndication agent for the banks (incorporated by
reference to the Companys quarterly report on
Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50890), filed on
September 17, 2004). |
|
10 |
.10 |
|
First Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of September 16, 2004, by and among Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks,
as administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of
the banks, as syndication agent for the banks. |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Second Amendment to Revolving Credit and Term Loan Agreement,
dated as of February 7, 2005, by and among Commercial
Vehicle Group, Inc., the subsidiary borrowers from time to time
parties thereto, the foreign currency borrowers from time to
time parties thereto, the banks from time to time parties
thereto, U.S. Bank National Association, one of the banks,
as administrative agent for the banks and Comerica Bank, one of
the banks, as syndication agent for the banks. |
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Investor Stockholders Agreement, dated October 5, 2000, by
and among Bostrom Holding, Inc., Onex American Holdings LLC, J2R
Partners VII and the stockholders listed on the signature pages
thereto (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Investor Stockholders Joinder Agreement, dated as of
March 28, 2003, by and among Bostrom Holding, Inc. and J2R
Partners VI, CVS Partners, LP and CVS Executive Investco LLC
(incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed
on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Joinder to the Investor Stockholders Agreement by and among
Bostrom Holding, Inc. and the prior stockholders of Trim Systems
(incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on
May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Management Stockholders Agreement, dated as of August 9,
2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc., Onex American
Holdings II LLC and the individuals named on
Schedule I thereto (incorporated by reference to the
Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File
No. 000- 50890), filed on September 17, 2004). |
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Note Purchase Agreement, dated September 30, 2002, by
and among Bostrom Holding, Inc., Baird Capital Partners II
Limited, BCP II Affiliates Fund Limited Partnership,
Baird Capital II Limited Partnership, Baird Capital
Partners III Limited Partnership, BCP III Special
Affiliates Limited Partnership, BCP III Affiliates
Fund Limited Partnership, Norwest Equity Partners VII, LP
and Hidden Creek Industries (incorporated by reference to the
Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Form of Subordinated Promissory Note issued by Bostrom Holding,
Inc. in favor of each of BCP II Affiliates
Fund Limited Partnership, Baird Capital II Limited
Partnership, Baird Capital Partners III Limited
Partnership, BCP III Special Affiliates Limited Partnership
BCP III Affiliates Fund Limited Partnership, Norwest
Equity Partners VII, LP and Hidden Creek Industries
(incorporated by reference to the Companys registration
statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on
May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.18 |
|
Promissory Note, dated as of June 28, 2001, issued by Trim
Systems Operating Corp. in favor of 1363880 Ontario Inc., in the
amount of $6,850,000 (incorporated by reference to the
Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.19 |
|
Promissory Note, dated as of June 28, 2001, issued by Trim
Systems Operating Corp. in favor of J2R Partners II-B, LLC,
in the amount of $150,000 (incorporated by reference to the
Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
65
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
10 |
.20* |
|
Bostrom Holding, Inc. Management Stock Option Plan (incorporated
by reference to the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on May 21,
2004). |
|
10 |
.21* |
|
Form of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Option pursuant to the
Bostrom Holding, Inc. Management Stock Option Plan (incorporated
by reference to the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on May 21,
2004). |
|
10 |
.22* |
|
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to the Companys quarterly
report on Form 10-Q (File No. 000-50890), filed on
September 17, 2004). |
|
10 |
.23* |
|
Form of Grant of Nonqualified Stock Option pursuant to the
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan. |
|
10 |
.24* |
|
Employment agreement, dated as of May 16, 1997, with Donald
P. Lorraine (incorporated by reference to the Companys
registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.25 |
|
Recapitalization Agreement, dated as of August 4, 2004, by
and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and the stockholders
listed on the signature pages thereto (incorporated by reference
to the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File
No. 000-50890), filed on September 17, 2004). |
|
10 |
.26 |
|
Form of Non-Competition Agreement (incorporated by reference to
the Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.27 |
|
Registration Agreement, dated October 5, 2000, by and among
Bostrom Holding, Inc. and the investors listed on
Schedule A attached thereto (incorporated by reference to
the Companys registration statement on Form S-1 (File
No. 333-15708), filed on May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.28 |
|
Joinder to Registration Agreement, dated as of March 28,
2003, by and among Bostrom Holding, Inc. and J2R Partners VI,
CVS Partners, LP and CVS Executive Investco LLC (incorporated by
reference to the Companys registration statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-15708), filed on
May 21, 2004). |
|
10 |
.29 |
|
Joinder to the Registration Agreement, dated as of May 20,
2004, by and among Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. and the prior
stockholders of Trim Systems (incorporated by reference to the
Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q (File
No. 000-50890), filed on September 17, 2004). |
|
10 |
.30* |
|
Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. 2005 Bonus Plan (incorporated by
reference to the Companys current report on Form 8-K
(File No. 000-50890), filed on February 7, 2005). |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. |
|
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification by Mervin Dunn, President and Chief Executive
Officer |
|
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification by Chad M. Utrup, Vice President of Finance and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
32 |
.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
32 |
.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
* |
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required
to be filed as an exhibit to this report on Form 10-K. |
66
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
COMMERCIAL VEHICLE GROUP, INC. |
Date: March 14, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf
of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Scott D. Rued
Scott
D. Rued |
|
Chairman and Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ Mervin Dunn
Mervin
Dunn |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) and Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ David R. Bovee
David
R. Bovee |
|
Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ S.A. Johnson
S.A.
Johnson |
|
Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ Eric J. Rosen
Eric
J. Rosen |
|
Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ Richard A. Snell
Richard
A. Snell |
|
Director |
|
March 14, 2005 |
|
/s/ Chad M. Utrup
Chad
M. Utrup |
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting
Officer) |
|
March 14, 2005 |
67