Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

WELLS FARGO & COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

420 Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94104
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 1-800-333-0343

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

                No securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

                Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

                Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934).

                At June 30, 2004, the aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates was approximately $95,077 million, based on a closing price of $57.23. At February 28, 2005, 1,695,767,987 shares of common stock were outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the Company’s 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Parts I, II and IV of this Form 10-K, and portions of the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. The cross-reference index on the following page identifies by page numbers the portions of each document that are incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K. Only those portions identified in the cross-reference index are incorporated into this Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

FORM 10-K CROSS-REFERENCE INDEX

1

Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

General

Wells Fargo & Company is a diversified financial services company organized under the laws of Delaware and registered as a bank holding company and financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (BHC Act). Based on assets of $428 billion at December 31, 2004, it was the fifth largest bank holding company in the United States. In this report, Wells Fargo & Company and Subsidiaries (consolidated) is referred to as the Company and Wells Fargo & Company alone is referred to as the Parent.

The Company engages in banking and a variety of related financial services businesses. Retail, commercial and corporate banking services are provided through banking stores in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, South Dakota, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. Other financial services are provided by subsidiaries engaged in various businesses, principally: wholesale banking, mortgage banking, consumer finance, equipment leasing, agricultural finance, commercial finance, securities brokerage and investment banking, insurance agency and brokerage services, computer and data processing services, trust services, mortgage-backed securities servicing and venture capital investment.

In February 2004, the Company completed the consolidation of 19 of its national bank charters into a single, national bank charter, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (Wells Fargo Bank). At December 31, 2004, Wells Fargo Bank was the Parent’s principal subsidiary with $366 billion in total assets, or 86% of the Company’s assets. Wells Fargo Bank is rated “Aaa” by Moody’s Investors Service and is the only U.S. bank to have the highest possible credit rating assigned by Moody’s.

With the acquisition of certain assets of Strong Financial Corporation at the end of 2004, the Company became one of the top 20 U.S. mutual fund companies, managing $100 billion in mutual funds. Total assets managed or administered (including brokerage) by the Company were $791 billion at December 31, 2004.

The Company has three operating segments for management reporting purposes: Community Banking, Wholesale Banking and Wells Fargo Financial. The 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders includes financial information and descriptions of these operating segments.

The Company had 145,500 full-time equivalent team members at December 31, 2004.

History and Growth

The Company is the product of the merger involving Norwest Corporation and the former Wells Fargo & Company, completed on November 2, 1998 (the WFC Merger). On completion of the WFC Merger, Norwest Corporation changed its name to Wells Fargo & Company.

2

Table of Contents

Norwest Corporation was organized in 1929 under the laws of the State of Delaware. Prior to the WFC Merger, it provided banking services to customers in 16 states and additional financial services through subsidiaries engaged in a variety of businesses including mortgage banking and consumer finance.

The former Wells Fargo & Company’s principal subsidiary, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., was the successor to the banking portion of the business founded by Henry Wells and William G. Fargo in 1852. That business later operated the westernmost leg of the Pony Express and ran stagecoach lines in the western part of the United States. The California banking business was separated from the express business in 1905, merged in 1960 with American Trust Company, another of the oldest banks in the Western United States, and became Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a national banking association, in 1968.

In April 1996, the former Wells Fargo & Company acquired First Interstate Bancorp, a $55 billion bank holding company in a transaction valued at $11 billion. In October 2000, the Company acquired First Security Corporation, a $23 billion bank holding company in a transaction valued at $3 billion.

The Company expands its business, in part, by acquiring banking institutions and other companies engaged in activities that are financial in nature. The Company continues to explore opportunities to acquire banking institutions and other financial services companies, and discussions are continually being carried on related to such possible acquisitions. The Company cannot predict whether, or on what terms, such discussions will result in further acquisitions. As a matter of policy, the Company generally does not comment on such discussions or possible acquisitions until a definitive acquisition agreement has been signed.

Competition

The financial services industry is highly competitive. The Company’s subsidiaries compete with financial services providers, such as banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, finance companies, mortgage banking companies, insurance companies, and money market and mutual fund companies. They also face increased competition from nonbank institutions such as brokerage houses and insurance companies, as well as from financial services subsidiaries of commercial and manufacturing companies. Many of these competitors enjoy fewer regulatory constraints and some may have lower cost structures.

Securities firms and insurance companies that elect to become financial holding companies may acquire banks and other financial institutions. Combinations of this type could significantly change the competitive environment in which the Company conducts business. The financial services industry is also likely to become more competitive as further technological advances enable more companies to provide financial services. These technological advances may diminish the importance of depository institutions and other financial intermediaries in the transfer of funds between parties.

3

Table of Contents

REGULATION AND SUPERVISION

The following discussion, together with Notes 3 (Cash, Loan and Dividend Restrictions) and 26 (Regulatory and Agency Capital Requirements) to Financial Statements included in the 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders, sets forth the material elements of the regulatory framework applicable to bank holding companies and their subsidiaries and provides certain information specific to us. This regulatory framework is intended to protect depositors, federal deposit insurance funds and the banking system as a whole, and not to protect security holders. To the extent that the information describes statutory and regulatory provisions, it is qualified in its entirety by reference to those provisions. Further, such statutes, regulations and policies are continually under review by Congress and state legislatures, and federal and state regulatory agencies. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to us, including changes in interpretation or implementation thereof, could have a material effect on the Company’s business.

Laws and regulations could restrict our ability to diversify into other areas of financial services, acquire depository institutions, and pay dividends on our capital stock. The Company may also be required to provide financial support to one or more of its subsidiary banks, maintain capital balances in excess of those desired by management, and pay higher deposit insurance premiums as a result of a general deterioration in the financial condition of depository institutions.

General

Parent Bank Holding Company. As a bank holding company, the Parent is subject to regulation under the BHC Act and to inspection, examination and supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve Board or FRB).

Subsidiary Banks. The Company’s subsidiary national banks are subject to regulation and examination primarily by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) and secondarily by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the FRB. The Company’s state-chartered banks are subject to primary federal regulation and examination by the FDIC and, in addition, are regulated and examined by their respective state banking departments.

Nonbank Subsidiaries. Many of the Company’s nonbank subsidiaries are also subject to regulation by the FRB and other applicable federal and state agencies. The Company’s brokerage subsidiaries are regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. and state securities regulators. The Company’s insurance subsidiaries are subject to regulation by applicable state insurance regulatory agencies. The Company’s other nonbank subsidiaries may be subject to the laws and regulations of the federal government and/or the various states in which they conduct business.

Parent Bank Holding Company Activities

“Financial in Nature” Requirement. As a bank holding company that has elected to become a financial holding company pursuant to the BHC Act, the Company may affiliate with securities firms and insurance companies and engage in other activities that are financial in nature or

4

Table of Contents

incidental or complementary to activities that are financial in nature. “Financial in nature” activities include securities underwriting, dealing and market making, sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies, insurance underwriting and agency, merchant banking, and activities that the FRB, in consultation with the Secretary of the U.S. Treasury, determines from time to time to be financial in nature or incidental to such financial activity or is complementary to a financial activity and does not pose a safety and soundness risk.

FRB approval is not required for the Company to acquire a company (other than a bank holding company, bank or savings association) engaged in activities that are financial in nature or incidental to activities that are financial in nature, as determined by the FRB. Prior FRB approval is required before the Company may acquire the beneficial ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares or substantially all of the assets of a bank holding company, bank or savings association.

Because the Company is a financial holding company, if any of our subsidiary banks receives a rating under the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, as amended (CRA), of less than satisfactory, the Company will be prohibited, until the rating is raised to satisfactory or better, from engaging in new activities or acquiring companies other than bank holding companies, banks or savings associations, except that the Company could engage in new activities, or acquire companies engaged in activities that are closely related to banking under the BHC Act. In addition, if the FRB finds that any of our subsidiary banks is not well capitalized or well managed, the Company would be required to enter into an agreement with the FRB to comply with all applicable capital and management requirements and which may contain additional limitations or conditions. Until corrected, the Company would not be able to engage in any new activity or acquire companies engaged in activities that are not closely related to banking under the BHC Act without prior FRB approval. If the Company fails to correct any such condition within a prescribed period, the FRB could order the Company to divest of its banking subsidiaries or, in the alternative, to cease engaging in activities other than those closely related to banking under the BHC Act.

The Company became a financial holding company effective March 13, 2000. It continues to maintain its status as a bank holding company for purposes of other FRB regulations.

Interstate Banking. Under the Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking and Branching Act (Riegle-Neal Act), a bank holding company may acquire banks in states other than its home state, subject to any state requirement that the bank has been organized and operating for a minimum period of time, not to exceed five years, and the requirement that the bank holding company not control, prior to or following the proposed acquisition, more than 10% of the total amount of deposits of insured depository institutions nationwide or, unless the acquisition is the bank holding company’s initial entry into the state, more than 30% of such deposits in the state (or such lesser or greater amount set by the state).

The Riegle-Neal Act also authorizes banks to merge across state lines, thereby creating interstate branches. Banks are also permitted to acquire and to establish new branches in other states where authorized under the laws of those states.

5

Table of Contents

Regulatory Approval. In determining whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition, federal bank regulators will consider, among other factors, the effect of the acquisition on competition, financial condition, and future prospects including current and projected capital ratios and levels, the competence, experience, and integrity of management and record of compliance with laws and regulation, the convenience and needs of the communities to be served, including the acquiring institution’s record of compliance under the CRA, and the effectiveness of the acquiring institution in combating money laundering activities.

Dividend Restrictions

The Parent is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiary banks and other subsidiaries. Its principal source of funds to pay dividends on its common and preferred stock and principal and interest on its debt is dividends from its subsidiaries. Various federal and state statutory provisions and regulations limit the amount of dividends the Parent’s subsidiary banks and certain other subsidiaries may pay without regulatory approval. For information about the restrictions applicable to the Parent’s subsidiary banks, see Note 3 (Cash, Loan and Dividend Restrictions) to Financial Statements included in the 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders.

Federal bank regulatory agencies have the authority to prohibit the Parent’s subsidiary banks from engaging in unsafe or unsound practices in conducting their businesses. The payment of dividends, depending on the financial condition of the bank in question, could be deemed an unsafe or unsound practice. The ability of the Parent’s subsidiary banks to pay dividends in the future is currently, and could be further, influenced by bank regulatory policies and capital guidelines.

Holding Company Structure

Transfer of Funds from Subsidiary Banks. The Parent’s subsidiary banks are subject to restrictions under federal law that limit the transfer of funds or other items of value from such subsidiaries to the Parent and its nonbank subsidiaries (including affiliates) in so-called “covered transactions.” In general, covered transactions include loans and other extensions of credit, investments and asset purchases, as well as certain other transactions involving the transfer of value from a subsidiary bank to an affiliate or for the benefit of an affiliate. Unless an exemption applies, covered transactions by a subsidiary bank with a single affiliate are limited to 10% of the subsidiary bank’s capital and surplus and, with respect to all covered transactions with affiliates in the aggregate, to 20% of the subsidiary bank’s capital and surplus. Also, loans and extensions of credit to affiliates generally are required to be secured in specified amounts. A bank’s transactions with its nonbank affiliates are also generally required to be on arm’s length terms.

Source of Strength. The FRB has a policy that a bank holding company is expected to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to each of its subsidiary banks and, under appropriate circumstances, to commit resources to support each such subsidiary bank. This support may be required at times when the bank holding company may not have the resources to provide the support.

6

Table of Contents

The OCC may order the assessment of the Parent if the capital of one of its national bank subsidiaries were to become impaired. If the Parent failed to pay the assessment within three months, the OCC could order the sale of the Parent’s stock in the national bank to cover the deficiency.

Capital loans by the Parent to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to deposits and certain other indebtedness of the subsidiary bank. In addition, in the event of the Parent’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the Parent to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to a priority of payment.

Depositor Preference. The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (FDI Act) provides that, in the event of the “liquidation or other resolution” of an insured depository institution, the claims of depositors of the institution (including the claims of the FDIC as subrogee of insured depositors) and certain claims for administrative expenses of the FDIC as a receiver will have priority over other general unsecured claims against the institution. If an insured depository institution fails, insured and uninsured depositors, along with the FDIC, will have priority in payment ahead of unsecured, nondeposit creditors, including the Parent, with respect to any extensions of credit they have made to such insured depository institution.

Liability of Commonly Controlled Institutions. All of the Parent’s banks are insured by the FDIC. FDIC-insured depository institutions can be held liable for any loss incurred, or reasonably expected to be incurred, by the FDIC due to the default of an FDIC-insured depository institution controlled by the same bank holding company, and for any assistance provided by the FDIC to an FDIC-insured depository institution that is in danger of default and that is controlled by the same bank holding company. “Default” means generally the appointment of a conservator or receiver. “In danger of default” means generally the existence of certain conditions indicating that a default is likely to occur in the absence of regulatory assistance.

Capital Requirements

The Parent is subject to regulatory capital requirements and guidelines imposed by the FRB, which are substantially similar to the capital requirements and guidelines imposed by the FRB, the OCC and the FDIC on depository institutions within their jurisdictions. For information about these capital requirements and guidelines, see Note 26 (Regulatory and Agency Capital Requirements) to Financial Statements included in the 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders.

The FRB may set higher capital requirements for holding companies whose circumstances warrant it. For example, holding companies experiencing internal growth or making acquisitions are expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels, without significant reliance on intangible assets. Also, the FRB considers a “tangible Tier 1 leverage ratio” (deducting all intangibles) and other indications of capital strength in evaluating proposals for expansion or engaging in new activities.

7

Table of Contents

FRB, FDIC and OCC rules also require the Company to incorporate market and interest rate risk components into its regulatory capital computations. Under the market risk requirements, capital is allocated to support the amount of market risk related to a financial institution’s ongoing trading activities.

The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision continues to evaluate certain aspects of the proposed New Basel Capital Accord. The New Basel Capital Accord incorporates three pillars that address (a) minimum capital requirements, (b) supervisory review, which relates to an institution’s capital adequacy and internal assessment process, and (c) market discipline, through effective disclosure to encourage safe and sound banking practices. Embodied within these pillars are aspects of risk assessment that relate to credit risk, interest rate risk, and operational risk, among others, and certain proposed approaches by the Basel Committee to complete such assessments may be considered complex. The Company continues to monitor the status of the New Basel Capital Accord and expects final rules to be published in mid-2006, effective 2008.

From time to time, the FRB and the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) propose changes and amendments to, and issue interpretations of, risk-based capital guidelines and related reporting instructions. Such proposals or interpretations could, if implemented in the future, affect the Company’s reported capital ratios and net risk-adjusted assets.

As an additional means to identify problems in the financial management of depository institutions, the FDI Act requires federal bank regulatory agencies to establish certain non-capital safety and soundness standards for institutions for which they are the primary federal regulator. The standards relate generally to operations and management, asset quality, interest rate exposure and executive compensation. The agencies are authorized to take action against institutions that fail to meet such standards.

The FDI Act requires federal bank regulatory agencies to take “prompt corrective action” with respect to FDIC-insured depository institutions that do not meet minimum capital requirements. A depository institution’s treatment for purposes of the prompt corrective action provisions will depend upon how its capital levels compare to various capital measures and certain other factors, as established by regulation.

Deposit Insurance Assessments

Through the Bank Insurance Fund (BIF) and the Savings Association Insurance Fund (SAIF), the FDIC insures the deposits of the Parent’s depository institution subsidiaries up to prescribed limits for each depositor. The amount of FDIC assessments paid by a BIF and SAIF member institution is based on its relative risk of default as measured by regulatory capital ratios and other factors. Specifically, the assessment rate is based on the institution’s capitalization risk category and supervisory subgroup category. An institution’s capitalization risk category is based on the FDIC’s determination of whether the institution is well capitalized, adequately capitalized or less than adequately capitalized. An institution’s supervisory subgroup category is based on the FDIC’s assessment of the financial condition of the institution and the probability that FDIC intervention or other corrective action will be required.

8

Table of Contents

The BIF and SAIF assessment rate currently ranges from zero to 27 cents per $100 of domestic deposits. The BIF and SAIF assessment rate for the Company’s depository institutions currently is zero. The FDIC may increase or decrease the assessment rate schedule on a semi-annual basis. An increase in the assessment rate could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s earnings, depending on the amount of the increase. The FDIC is authorized to terminate a depository institution’s deposit insurance upon a finding by the FDIC that the institution’s financial condition is unsafe or unsound or that the institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices or has violated any applicable rule, regulation, order or condition enacted or imposed by the institution’s regulatory agency. The termination of deposit insurance for one or more of the Company’s subsidiary depository institutions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s earnings, depending on the collective size of the particular institutions involved.

All FDIC-insured depository institutions must pay an annual assessment to provide funds for the payment of interest on bonds issued by the Financing Corporation, a federal corporation chartered under the authority of the Federal Housing Finance Board. The bonds (commonly referred to as FICO bonds) were issued to capitalize the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation. FDIC-insured depository institutions paid approximately 1.5 cents per $100 of BIF-assessable deposits in 2004. The FDIC established the FICO assessment rate effective for the first quarter of 2005 at approximately 1.4 cents annually per $100 of assessable deposits.

Fiscal and Monetary Policies

The Company’s business and earnings are affected significantly by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies. The Company is particularly affected by the policies of the FRB, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Among the instruments of monetary policy available to the FRB are (a) conducting open market operations in United States government securities, (b) changing the discount rates of borrowings of depository institutions, (c) imposing or changing reserve requirements against depository institutions’ deposits, and (d) imposing or changing reserve requirements against certain borrowings by banks and their affiliates. These methods are used in varying degrees and combinations to directly affect the availability of bank loans and deposits, as well as the interest rates charged on loans and paid on deposits. The policies of the FRB may have a material effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.

Privacy Provisions of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act

Federal banking regulators, as required under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (the GLB Act), have adopted rules limiting the ability of banks and other financial institutions to disclose nonpublic information about consumers to nonaffiliated third parties. The rules require disclosure of privacy policies to consumers and, in some circumstances, allow consumers to prevent disclosure of certain personal information to nonaffiliated third parties. The privacy provisions of the GLB Act affect how consumer information is transmitted through diversified financial services companies and conveyed to outside vendors.

9

Table of Contents

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley) implemented a broad range of corporate governance and accounting measures to increase corporate responsibility, to provide for enhanced penalties for accounting and auditing improprieties at publicly traded companies, and to protect investors by improving the accuracy and reliability of disclosures under federal securities laws. The Company is subject to Sarbanes-Oxley because it is required to file periodic reports with the SEC under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Among other things, Sarbanes-Oxley and/or its implementing regulations have established new membership requirements and additional responsibilities for our audit committee, imposed restrictions on the relationship between the Company and its outside auditors (including restrictions on the types of non-audit services our auditors may provide to us), imposed additional responsibilities for our external financial statements on our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, expanded the disclosure requirements for our corporate insiders, and required our management to evaluate the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and its internal control over financial reporting and required our auditors to issue a report on our internal control over financial reporting. The New York Stock Exchange has imposed a number of new corporate governance requirements as well.

Patriot Act

The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (Patriot Act) is intended to strengthen the ability of U.S. law enforcement agencies and intelligence communities to work together to combat terrorism on a variety of fronts. The Patriot Act has significant implications for depository institutions, brokers, dealers and other businesses involved in the transfer of money. The Patriot Act requires the Company to implement new or revised policies and procedures relating to anti-money laundering, compliance, suspicious activities, and currency transaction reporting and due diligence on customers. The Patriot Act also requires federal bank regulators to evaluate the effectiveness of an applicant in combating money laundering in determining whether to approve a proposed bank acquisition.

Future Legislation

Various legislation, including proposals to change substantially the financial institution regulatory system, is from time to time introduced in Congress. This legislation may change banking statutes and the operating environment of the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. If enacted, this legislation could increase or decrease the cost of doing business, limit or expand permissible activities or affect the competitive balance among banks, savings associations, credit unions, and other financial institutions. The Company cannot predict whether any of this potential legislation will be enacted and, if enacted, the effect that it, or any implementing regulations, would have on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.

10

Table of Contents

REPURCHASES OF COMMON STOCK

The following table shows Company repurchases of its common stock for each calendar month in the quarter ended December 31, 2004.

11

Table of Contents

ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME

The following table allocates the changes in net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis to changes in either average balances or average rates for both interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Because of the numerous simultaneous volume and rate changes during any period, it is not possible to precisely allocate such changes between volume and rate. For this table, changes that are not solely due to either volume or rate are allocated to these categories in proportion to the percentage changes in average volume and average rate.

12

Table of Contents

LOAN PORTFOLIO

The following table presents the remaining contractual principal maturities of selected loan categories at December 31, 2004.

At December 31, 2004, the Company did not have loan concentrations that exceeded 10% of total loans except as disclosed in the following tables.

REAL ESTATE 1-4 FAMILY FIRST AND JUNIOR LIEN MORTGAGE LOANS BY STATE

13

Table of Contents

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS
(OTHER REAL ESTATE MORTGAGE AND REAL ESTATE CONSTRUCTION)

At December 31, 2004, commercial loans (not including commercial real estate loans) included agricultural loans (loans to finance agricultural production and other loans to farmers) of $4,373 million, or 2% of total loans.

14

Table of Contents

ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

Indicators of the credit quality of our loan portfolio and the method of determining the allowance for credit losses, which consists of the allowance for loan losses and the reserve for unfunded credit commitments, are discussed below and in greater detail in the 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to net charge-offs was 237% and 226% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. This ratio fluctuates from period to period and the change in 2004 is indicative of stable loss rates within the various consumer and small business lines and unsustainable low loss rates within the wholesale middle market and real estate portfolios. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to total nonaccrual loans was 291% and 267% at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. This ratio may fluctuate significantly from period to period due to such factors as the mix of loan types in the portfolio, borrower credit strength and the value and marketability of collateral.

ALLOCATION OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES

15

Table of Contents

See Note 6 (Loans and Allowance for Credit Losses) to Financial Statements included in the 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders for a description of the process used by the Company to determine the adequacy and the components (allocated and unallocated) of the allowance for credit losses.

The allowance for credit losses was $3,950 million at December 31, 2004, and $3,891 million at December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2004, the allowance for loan losses was $3,762 million, or 1.31% of total loans, compared with $3,891 million, or 1.54%, at December 31, 2003. During 2004, the provision for credit losses was $1,717 million and net loan charge-offs totaled $1,666 million. The components of the allowance for credit losses, allocated and unallocated, are shown in the table on the previous page. The allocated component was $3,062 million at December 31, 2004 and $3,072 million at December 31, 2003, while the unallocated was $888 million at December 31, 2004, and $819 million at December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2004, the unallocated portion of the allowance for credit losses was 22% of the total allowance, compared with 21% at December 31, 2003.

The allocated component of the allowance for credit losses decreased $10 million from 2003 to 2004. Changes in allocated allowance reflect changes in statistically derived loss estimates, historical loss experience, and current trends in borrower risk and/or general economic activity on portfolio performance.

The unallocated component of the allowance for credit losses increased $69 million from 2003 to 2004, and reflects our judgment of risks and uncertainties inherent in the portfolio and other subjective factors.

No material changes in estimation methodology for the allowance for credit losses were made in 2004.

The Company considers the allowance for credit losses of $3,950 million, which includes the $188 million reserve for unfunded credit commitments, adequate to cover credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio at December 31, 2004.

The foregoing discussion contains forward-looking statements about the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for credit losses. These forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties. A number of factors—many beyond our control—could cause actual losses to be more than estimated losses. For a discussion of some of the other factors that could cause actual losses to be more than estimated losses, see “Factors That May Affect Future Results” in the “Financial Review” section of the 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders.

16

Table of Contents

PROPERTIES

The Company owns its corporate headquarters building in San Francisco, California. The Company also owns administrative facilities in Anchorage, Alaska; Chandler, Phoenix, and Tempe, Arizona; Minneapolis and Shoreview, Minnesota; Billings, Montana; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Portland, Oregon; Sioux Falls, South Dakota and Salt Lake City, Utah. In January 2005, the Company purchased a large administrative facility in San Francisco, California. In addition, the Company leases office space for various administrative departments in major locations in Arizona, California, Colorado, Minnesota, Oregon, Texas, and Utah.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company provided banking, insurance, investments, mortgage banking and consumer finance through more than 6,000 stores under various types of ownership and leasehold agreements. The Company owns the Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (Home Mortgage) headquarters in Des Moines, Iowa and operations/servicing centers in Springfield, Illinois and Minneapolis, Minnesota. In addition, the Company leases administrative space for Home Mortgage in Tempe, Arizona; Riverside and San Bernardino, California; Des Moines, Iowa; Frederick, Maryland; Minneapolis, Minnesota; St. Louis, Missouri; Fort Mill, South Carolina and all mortgage production offices nationwide. Wells Fargo Financial, Inc. (WFFI) owns two administrative buildings and a printing facility in Des Moines, Iowa, an operations center in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, and leases all store locations. In addition, WFFI leases administrative space in Minneapolis, Minnesota; Mississauga, Ontario; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; San Juan, Puerto Rico and Aberdeen, South Dakota.

The Company is also a joint venture partner in an office building in downtown Minneapolis, Minnesota.

For further information with respect to premises and equipment and commitments under noncancelable leases for premises and equipment, refer to Note 7 (Premises, Equipment, Lease Commitments and Other Assets) to Financial Statements included in the 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders.

17

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

18

Table of Contents

There is no family relationship between any of the Company’s executive officers or directors. All executive officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

AUDIT COMMITTEE INFORMATION
The Audit and Examination Committee is a standing audit committee of the Board of Directors established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Committee has seven members: J.A. Blanchard III, Enrique Hernandez, Jr., Reatha Clark King, Cynthia H. Milligan, Philip J. Quigley, Judith M. Runstad and Susan G. Swenson. Each member is independent, as independence for audit committee members is defined by New York Stock Exchange rules. The Board of Directors has determined, in its business judgment, that each member of the Committee is financially literate, as required by New York Stock Exchange rules, and that J.A. Blanchard III, Enrique Hernandez, Jr., Cynthia H. Milligan, Philip J. Quigley and Susan G. Swenson each qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by Securities and Exchange Commission regulations.

19

Table of Contents

SEC FILINGS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS

As soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Company’s annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports, are available free at www.wellsfargo.com (select “About Wells Fargo,” then “Investor Relations,” then “SEC Filings”). They are also available free on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

The Company’s Code of Ethics and Business Conduct for team members (including executive officers), Director Code of Ethics, the Company’s corporate governance guidelines, and the charters for the Audit and Examination, Governance and Nominating, Human Resources, Credit, and Finance Committees are available at www.wellsfargo.com (select “About Wells Fargo,” then “Corporate Governance”). This information is also available in print to any stockholder upon written request to the Office of the Secretary, Wells Fargo & Company, MAC N9305-173, Wells Fargo Center, Sixth and Marquette, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55479.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(1)		The consolidated financial statements and related notes, the report of independent registered public accounting firm, and supplementary data that appear on pages 33 through 113 of the 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders are incorporated herein by reference.
(2)		Financial Statement Schedules:
		All schedules are omitted, because they are either not applicable or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.
(3)		Exhibits:
		The Company’s SEC file number is 001-2979. On and before November 2, 1998, the Company filed documents with the SEC under the name Norwest Corporation. The former Wells Fargo & Company filed documents under SEC file number 001-6214.
		Stockholders may obtain a copy of any of the following exhibits, upon payment of a reasonable fee, by writing to Wells Fargo & Company, Office of the Secretary, Wells Fargo Center, N9305-173, Sixth and Marquette, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55479.

20

Table of Contents

21

Table of Contents

22

Table of Contents

23

Table of Contents

24

Table of Contents

25

Table of Contents

26

Table of Contents

STATUS OF PRIOR DOCUMENTS

The Wells Fargo & Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, at the time of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, shall modify and supersede all documents filed prior to January 1, 2005 pursuant to Sections 13, 14 and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (other than Exhibit 99(e) to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, containing a description of the Company’s common stock) for purposes of any offers or sales of any securities after the date of such filing pursuant to any Registration Statement or Prospectus filed pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 which incorporates by reference such Annual Report on Form 10-K.

27

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 10, 2005.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.

The Directors of Wells Fargo & Company listed below have duly executed powers of attorney empowering Philip J. Quigley to sign this document on their behalf.

28