Back to GetFilings.com
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004
Commission File Number 1-13388
GUIDANT CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Indiana |
|
35-1931722 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(IRS Employer
Identification No.) |
|
111 Monument Circle, 29th Floor,
Indianapolis, Indiana |
|
46204
(Zip Code) |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
317.971.2000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Preferred Stock Purchase Rights
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in the definitive proxy or
information statement incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
The aggregate market value of the registrants common
shares (the only outstanding equity shares) as of June 30,
2004 (the last trading day of the second fiscal quarter), less
shares held by officers and directors of the registrant, was
approximately $17.5 billion.
The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of
February 10, 2005: 322,599,255
PART I
Overview
Guidant Corporation provides innovative, therapeutic medical
solutions of distinctive value for customers, patients and
healthcare systems around the world. Guidants lifesaving
medical technologies are designed to extend the lives and
improve the quality of life of millions of patients suffering
from life-threatening cardiovascular disease. Approximately
12,000 employees develop, manufacture and market the
Companys medical devices in nearly 100 countries,
with key operations in the US, Europe and Asia. As used herein,
the terms the Company and Guidant mean
Guidant Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death for both
men and women in the US today and claims more lives each year
than the next five leading causes of death combined. Within
cardiovascular disease, Guidant develops, manufactures and
markets products that focus on the treatment of cardiac
arrhythmias, heart failure and coronary and peripheral disease
including:
|
|
|
|
|
Implantable defibrillator systems used to detect and treat
abnormally fast heart rhythms (tachycardia) that could
result in sudden cardiac death (SCD), including implantable
cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) systems
used to treat heart failure |
|
|
|
Implantable pacemaker systems used to manage slow or irregular
heart rhythms (bradycardia), including implantable cardiac
resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) systems used to
treat heart failure |
|
|
|
Coronary stent systems for the treatment of coronary artery
disease |
|
|
|
Angioplasty systems, including dilatation catheters, guidewires
and related accessories for the treatment of coronary artery
disease |
|
|
|
Cardiac surgery systems to perform cardiac surgical ablation,
endoscopic vessel harvesting (EVH) and beating-heart bypass
surgery |
|
|
|
Peripheral systems, including those to treat biliary, peripheral
vascular and carotid artery disease |
On December 15, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement
and plan of merger with Johnson & Johnson (J&J)
pursuant to which J&J will acquire the Company for
approximately $25.4 billion in fully diluted equity value.
Under the terms of the agreement, each Company common share will
be exchanged for $30.40 in cash and $45.60 in J&J stock,
provided that the average J&J common stock price is between
$55.45 and $67.09 during the fifteen-day trading period ending
three days prior to the transaction closing. Accordingly, each
Guidant share will be converted into not more than .8224 and not
less than .6797 of a J&J common share, plus $30.40 in cash.
The boards of directors of the Company and J&J have approved
the transaction, which remains subject to the approval of the
Companys shareholders, clearance under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, the European
Union merger control regulation, and other customary closing
conditions.
2
The graph below depicts the contributions of the Companys
products to its overall revenues:
Products
Guidants primary medical devices treat the heart, managing
its rhythms, clearing its arteries, and permitting less-invasive
surgeries. Less-invasive therapies have also been extended
beyond the heart to clear and treat non-coronary vessels and
biliary strictures. The following sections further describe
Guidants products.
Cardiac Rhythm Management
Natural electrical impulses stimulate the hearts chambers
to pump blood. In healthy individuals, the electrical current
causes the heart to beat at an appropriate rate and in
synchrony. Guidant makes a variety of implantable devices that
can monitor the heart and deliver electricity to treat cardiac
abnormalities, including the following:
Tachycardia (abnormally fast or chaotic heart
rhythms) can prevent the heart from pumping blood efficiently
and can lead to SCD, sudden cardiac death. Implantable
cardioverter defibrillator systems (defibrillators, leads,
programmers and accessories) monitor the heart and can deliver
electrical energy, restoring a normal rhythm. Guidants
defibrillators can deliver tiered therapy a staged
progression from lower intensity pacing pulses designed to
correct the abnormal rhythm to more aggressive shocks to restore
a heartbeat. The Companys products, including the
VITALITY® family of defibrillators, provide a broad range
of atrial (upper chambers of the heart) and ventricular (lower
chambers) therapies to serve patients various needs.
The Guidant-funded MADIT II study demonstrated the benefit
of Guidant defibrillators in reducing mortality in heart attack
survivors with compromised heart function and is further
described in Item 7. MADIT II enhances
physicians ability to identify and treat an expanded at
risk patient population.
Heart failure (the hearts inability to pump
effectively) is a debilitating, progressive condition, with
symptoms including shortness of breath and extreme fatigue.
Mortality for diagnosed patients is estimated to be 50% after
five years. The condition is pervasive, with nearly five million
Americans affected. Cardiac resynchronization therapy
(CRT) devices, like certain devices in the Companys
CONTAK RENEWAL® family of devices, can help reduce
mortality and hospitalization.
Recent clinical trials continue to support positive market
trends in this area. For example, the results of the National
Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes Sudden Cardiac Death in
Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) demonstrated positive benefits of
implantable defibrillators in patients with heart failure.
Similarly, investiga-
3
tors in the COMPANION clinical trial reported that for advanced
heart failure patients with desynchronized heart contractions,
the addition of resynchronization therapy to optimal drug
treatment reduced the combination of death and hospitalization
when compared with optimal drug treatment alone. SCD-HeFT and
COMPANION are further described in Item 7.
Sales of CRT devices are included in the sales of defibrillators
and pacemaker systems.
Bradycardia (slow or irregular heart rhythms)
often results in an insufficient heart rate to provide adequate
blood flow, creating symptoms such as fatigue, dizziness and
fainting. Cardiac pacemaker systems (pulse generators, leads,
programmers, and accessories) deliver electrical energy to
stimulate the heart to beat more frequently. Pacemakers range
from conventional single-chamber devices to more sophisticated
adaptive-rate, dual-chamber devices. Company pacemakers,
including the INSIGNIA® family, offer proprietary blended
sensor technology designed to measure patient workload through
respiration and motion, providing rate response based on the
patients activity.
Vascular Intervention
The coronary arteries, which supply blood to the heart, are
susceptible to buildups of plaque, which can inhibit essential
blood flow. Historically, these obstructions were treated with
coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) an open
surgery using a portion of another vessel to route around the
blockage. As described below, angioplasty and stenting have
provided less-invasive alternatives, while drug eluting stents
have further advanced this therapy.
Angioplasty systems and accessories can open
clogged arteries. In a percutaneous transluminal coronary
angioplasty (PTCA) procedure, a local anesthetic is
administered and a small incision is made in the patients
groin area to access the femoral artery. The physician inserts a
guiding catheter through the femoral artery, up through the
aorta and into the entrance of the coronary blood vessel and
then advances a small guidewire through the inside of the
guiding catheter into the blood vessel and across the site of
the blockage. Then a dilatation catheter such as a
Guidant
VOYAGERtm
Catheter is delivered over the guidewire through the
inside of the guiding catheter into the blood vessel and across
the site of the blockage. The dilatation catheter is then
inflated to compress the plaque against the artery wall,
enlarging the opening of the vessel and increasing blood flow to
the heart. At the end of the PTCA procedure, all of the devices
are withdrawn. These systems can also be used as components of a
stent system.
Coronary stents help overcome a major clinical
challenge to PTCA restenosis, the renarrowing of the
blood vessel at the site of the initial treatment. Coronary
stents are metal tubes or coils that are mounted on coronary
dilatation catheters. Coronary stents, such as the
Companys MULTI-LINK® family, are permanently deployed
at a blockage by inflating the coronary dilatation catheter to
expand the stent in the artery. When the coronary dilatation
catheter is removed from the artery, the stent stays in place,
providing scaffolding to keep the artery open.
Drug eluting stents are coated with compounds
designed to prevent excessive cell re-growth within the
stent in-stent restenosis. Their development
represents a revolutionary advance in cardiovascular treatment,
increasing the value of the therapy substantially. Competitive
drug eluting stents were available in the US and Europe
throughout 2004 and in Japan during the second half of 2004.
These introductions have reduced Guidants sales of
metallic coronary stents, particularly in the US. While the
Company has not launched a drug eluting stent, drug eluting
stents present a compelling opportunity for the Company, subject
to completion of appropriate clinical work and receipt of
necessary regulatory approvals for the Companys products.
Guidant currently co-promotes with Cordis Corporation (Cordis),
a subsidiary of J&J, the Cordis CYPHER®
Sirolimus-eluting Coronary Stent in the US, under an agreement
entered into in February 2004.
Additional Therapies
Cardiac surgery devices are used to perform EVH,
cardiac surgical ablation and less-invasive CABG procedures.
Surgical cardiac ablation systems include the FLEX®
Microwave Systems, which allow physi-
4
cians to perform cardiac surgical ablation procedures both in an
open setting concomitant to a valve or bypass procedure, and in
a stand-alone minimally invasive procedure.
EVH through the VASOVIEW® Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting
System allows physicians to harvest the saphenous vein, the most
common bypass conduit used in CABG procedures, in a
less-invasive manner through one or two small incisions in a
patients leg, or the radial artery through small incisions
in a patients arm. Guidant also provides devices to enable
a complete less-invasive CABG procedure a bypass
performed while a patients heart remains beating. This
eliminates the need to stop the patients heart and place
the patient on a heart-lung machine that circulates the
patients blood during the CABG procedure. Devices such as
Guidants
ACROBATtm
Systems help stabilize and manipulate the heart during
beating-heart surgery. Guidant estimates that approximately 30%
of all CABG procedures in the US use the beating-heart approach
and in excess of 60% use minimally invasive vessel harvesting.
Biliary, peripheral and carotid systems are used
to treat artery and biliary stricture disease. Guidant products
include the
ABSOLUTEtm
Self-Expanding Stent,
AGILTRACtm
Peripheral Dilatation Catheter and RX
ACCULINKtm
Carotid Stent System, including the RX
ACCUNETtm
Embolic Protection System.
Sales and Marketing
Guidant relies on a direct sales force and independent
distributors to best serve its global customers. Sales personnel
work closely with the primary decision makers who purchase
products, including physicians, material managers, biomedical
staff, hospital administrators and purchasing managers. As
further described below, third-party payors and group purchasers
have become increasingly important.
The primary physician users of Guidants largest-selling
products are as follows:
|
|
|
Therapy |
|
Physicians |
|
|
|
Defibrillator systems
|
|
Electrophysiologists, implanting cardiologists |
Pacemaker systems
|
|
Electrophysiologists, implanting cardiologists, cardiovascular
surgeons |
Coronary stents and angioplasty
|
|
Interventional cardiologists |
Cardiac surgery systems
|
|
Cardiac surgeons |
Non-coronary stents and angioplasty
|
|
Vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, interventional
cardiologists, interventional neuro-radiologists |
In the US, Guidant sells substantially all of its products
through a direct sales force. In 2004, 67% of consolidated net
sales was derived from sales to customers in the US.
In 2004, 33% of consolidated net sales was derived from
operations outside the US through a direct sales force and
independent distributors. Guidant sells products in nearly 100
countries. Major markets include Europe and Japan, with 23% and
7% of worldwide net sales in 2004. (Revenues are attributed to
countries based on the location of the customer.) Guidant is not
dependent on any single customer, and no single customer
accounted for more than 10% of consolidated net sales in 2004.
The sales and marketing approach outside the US varies depending
on country size and stage of development.
Competition and Customers
The medical technology industry is highly competitive and is
characterized by rapid product development and technological
change. In order to remain competitive with other developers of
medical devices and other therapies, Guidant must continue to
develop and acquire cost-effective new products and
technologies. Similarly, significant shifts in market share have
occurred in connection with production, regulatory, safety, and
other concerns, reflecting the importance of product quality.
Guidants primary competitors for implantable cardiac
rhythm management devices are Medtronic, Inc. (Medtronic) and
St. Jude Medical, Inc. (St. Jude). Guidants primary
competitors for vascular disease
5
products include Abbott Laboratories, Boston Scientific
Corporation (Boston Scientific), CR Bard, Inc., J&J,
Medtronic, Sorin Biomedica and Terumo Medical Corporation.
Guidant faces a number of additional competitors with respect to
Guidants other products. Guidant also faces competition
from providers of alternative medical therapies, such as
pharmaceutical companies. Guidant competes primarily on the
basis of therapy effectiveness, product features, product
quality, customer support, price, field services and cost
effectiveness.
Research and Development
Innovation is essential to Guidants success. It is one of
the primary bases of competition in Guidants markets. The
Company works to introduce new products, enhance the
effectiveness and ease of use of existing products and expand
the applications for its existing products.
Guidants research and development staff focuses on product
design and development, quality, clinical research and
regulatory compliance. The Companys research and
development facilities are described in Item 2. Item 7
further describes the Companys recent development efforts,
including drug eluting stent research and research concerning
advanced patient management features for cardiac rhythm
management devices.
To pursue primary research efforts, Guidant has developed
alliances with several leading research institutions and
universities. Guidant also works with leading clinicians around
the world in conducting scientific studies on the Companys
products. These studies include clinical trials that provide
data for use in regulatory submissions and post-market approval
studies involving applications of products.
Guidant evaluates developing technologies in areas where the
Company may have technological or marketing expertise for
possible investment or acquisition. Guidant also has invested in
several development-stage companies.
In each of the past three years, Guidant has invested 13-14% of
net sales in research and development (excluding purchased
in-process research and development).
Manufacturing and Raw Materials
Guidant vertically integrates operations where integration
provides significant cost, supply or quality benefits. In some
areas, Guidant is highly vertically integrated. In other cases,
the Company purchases raw materials and components. In all
cases, Guidant attempts to work closely with suppliers to ensure
the cost-effective delivery of high quality materials and
components. Major considerations used in the selection and
retention of suppliers are supplier technology, quality,
reliability, consistent on-time delivery, services to be
provided and cost.
In general, production activities occur in a controlled
environment setting or clean room. Manufacturing
employees are trained in the necessary production operations and
quality system standards applicable to the production process.
Guidants facilities are further described in Item 2.
The Company purchases many of the materials and components used
in manufacturing products, some of which are custom made.
Certain supplies are purchased from single sources due to
quality considerations, costs or constraints resulting from
regulatory requirements. Agreements with certain suppliers can
be terminated upon short notice. The Company cannot quickly
establish additional or replacement suppliers for certain
components or materials, largely due to the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) and other approval systems, and the
complex nature of the manufacturing processes employed by many
suppliers. Production issues, including capacity constraints,
affecting facilities or those of suppliers can affect the
Companys ability to bring new or existing products to
market.
6
Patents, Trademarks, Proprietary Rights and Licenses
Patents and other proprietary rights are essential to
Guidants business. Guidant also relies upon trade secrets,
know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing
opportunities to develop, maintain and strengthen the
Companys competitive position. The Company reviews
third-party patents and patent applications, as publicly
available, in an effort to develop an effective patent strategy,
avoid infringement of third-party patents, identify licensing
opportunities and monitor the patent claims of others.
The Company owns numerous patents and has numerous patent
applications pending in the US and in foreign countries designed
to protect the inventions contained in many products, as well as
surgical methods in which products are used. The Company is a
party to numerous license agreements pursuant to which patent
rights have been obtained or granted in consideration for cash,
cross-licensing rights or royalty payments.
Guidants policy is to seek patent protection in the US and
elsewhere where it is commercially advantageous to do so.
However, the standards for protection of intellectual property
vary widely.
The Company cannot assure that pending patent applications will
result in issued patents, that patents issued or licensed will
not be challenged or circumvented by competitors, that Company
patents will not be found to be invalid or that the intellectual
property rights of others will not prevent the Company from
selling certain products or including key features in the
Companys products.
The Company operates in an industry susceptible to significant
patent litigation. At any given time, Guidant generally is
involved as both a plaintiff and defendant in a number of patent
infringement and other intellectual-property related actions.
Such litigation can result in significant royalty or other
payments or result in injunctions that can prevent the sale of
products. (See Item 8, Note 16 to the consolidated
financial statements.)
Healthcare Cost Containment and Third-Party Reimbursement
The ability of customers to obtain appropriate reimbursement for
products and services from government and third-party payors is
essential to the success of medical technology companies. The
availability of reimbursement affects which products customers
purchase and the prices they are willing to pay. Reimbursement
varies from country to country and can significantly impact the
acceptance of new technology.
After the Company develops a promising new product, the Company
may find limited demand for the product unless reimbursement
approval is obtained from private and governmental third-party
payors. Reimbursement decisions for products such as
defibrillators, including new or expanded indications, can
materially affect results. The Company is actively engaged in
the policy dialogue concerning healthcare cost containment and
reimbursement and works to demonstrate the value of Company
products.
Major third-party payors for hospital services in the US
(Medicare, Medicaid, private healthcare insurance and managed
care plans) and abroad continue to work to contain healthcare
costs. The introduction of cost containment incentives, combined
with closer scrutiny of healthcare expenditures by both private
health insurers and employers, has resulted in increased
discounts and contractual adjustments to hospital charges for
services performed and in the shifting of services between
inpatient and outpatient settings. Initiatives to limit the
growth of healthcare costs, including price regulation, are also
underway in other countries in which Guidant does business.
Implementation of healthcare reforms in significant markets and
other countries may limit the price of, or the level at which
reimbursement is provided for Company products.
Government Regulation
Medical devices are subject to regulation by numerous regulatory
bodies, including the FDA and comparable agencies in other
countries. The Company must comply with laws and regulations
governing the development, testing, manufacturing, labeling,
marketing and distribution of medical devices.
7
Devices are subject to varying levels of regulatory control, the
most comprehensive of which requires that a clinical evaluation
be conducted before a device receives approval for commercial
distribution. In the US, the Company generally can obtain
permission to distribute a new device in two ways. The first
applies to any new device that is substantially equivalent to a
device first marketed prior to May 1976. In this case, to obtain
FDA permission to distribute the device, the Company generally
must submit a pre-market notification application (a 510(k)
submission), and receive an FDA order finding substantial
equivalence to a predicate device (pre-May 1976) and permitting
commercial distribution of that device for its intended use. A
510(k) submission must provide information supporting its claim
of substantial equivalence to the predicate device. If clinical
data from human experience is required to support the 510(k)
submission, this data must be gathered in compliance with
investigational device exemption (IDE) regulations for
investigations performed in the US.
The second, more comprehensive, approval process applies to a
new device that is not substantially equivalent to a pre-1976
product. In this case, two steps of FDA approval generally are
required before the Company can market the product in the US.
First, the Company must comply with IDE regulations in
connection with any human clinical investigation of the device.
Second, the FDA must review the Companys pre-market
approval (PMA) application, which contains, among other
things, clinical information acquired under the IDE. The FDA
will approve the PMA application if it finds there is reasonable
assurance the device is safe and effective for its intended use.
Certain changes to existing devices that do not significantly
affect safety or effectiveness can be made with in vitro
testing under reduced regulatory procedures, generally without
human clinical trials and by filing a PMA supplement to a prior
PMA.
Exported devices are subject to the regulatory requirements of
each country to which the device is exported, as well as certain
FDA export requirements. Frequently, regulatory approval may
first be obtained in a foreign country prior to application in
the US. For example, the Company often completes Conformité
Européene (CE) Mark registrations for Company products
under various medical device directives in the European Union.
After approval or clearance to market is given, the FDA and
foreign regulatory agencies, upon the occurrence of certain
events, have the power to withdraw the clearance or require
changes to a device, its manufacturing process, or its labeling
or additional proof that regulatory requirements have been met.
The Company is also required to register with the FDA as a
device manufacturer. As a result, the Company is subject to
periodic inspection by the FDA for compliance with the
FDAs Quality System Regulation requirements and other
regulations. In the European Community, the Company is required
to maintain certain International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) certifications in order to sell
product and it undergoes periodic inspections by notified bodies
to obtain and maintain these certifications. These regulations
require the Company to manufacture products and maintain
documents in a prescribed manner with respect to design,
manufacturing, testing and control activities. Further, the
Company is required to comply with various FDA and other agency
requirements for labeling and promotion. The Medical Device
Reporting regulations require that the Company provide
information to the FDA whenever there is evidence to reasonably
suggest that a device may have caused or contributed to a death
or serious injury or, if a malfunction were to occur, could
cause or contribute to a death or serious injury. In addition,
the FDA prohibits the Company from promoting a medical device
for unapproved indications.
The delivery of the Companys devices is also regulated by
the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and
comparable state and foreign agencies responsible for
reimbursement and regulation of health care. US federal health
care laws apply when the Company submits a claim on behalf of a
federal health care program beneficiary, or when a customer
submits a claim reimbursed under Medicare, Medicaid or most
other federally funded health care programs. The principal
federal laws prohibit the filing of false or improper claims for
federal payment and unlawful inducements for the referral of
business. They also prohibit health care service providers from
providing certain services to a patient if that patient was
referred by a physician who has certain types of direct or
indirect financial relationships with the service provider.
These laws are subject to interpretations.
8
If the FDA believes that a company is not in compliance with
applicable regulations, it can issue a warning letter, issue a
recall order, institute proceedings to detain or seize products,
impose operating restrictions, enjoin future violations and
assess civil penalties against the company, its officers or its
employees and can recommend criminal prosecution to the
Department of Justice. Other foreign and domestic regulatory
agencies may have similar powers. HHS also can impose severe
criminal and civil penalties including, for example, exclusion
from participation as a supplier of product to beneficiaries
covered by Medicare or Medicaid. In June 2003, in connection
with the resolution of the ANCURE® matter further described
in Item 8, Note 16 to the consolidated financial
statements, Guidant and its EndoVascular Technologies, Inc.
(EVT) subsidiary entered into a Corporate Integrity
Agreement with the Office of Inspector General of HHS. The
agreement has a five-year term.
Guidant cannot assure that all necessary regulatory approvals,
including approvals for new products or product improvements,
will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Delays in or
failures to receive approval, product recalls or warnings and
other regulatory actions and penalties can materially affect
operating results.
Environmental Regulation
The Company uses substances regulated under environmental laws,
primarily in manufacturing and sterilization processes. While it
is difficult to quantify, the Company believes the ongoing
impact of compliance with environmental protection laws and
regulations will not have a material impact on the
Companys financial position or results of operations.
Product Liability and Insurance
The design, manufacture and marketing of medical devices of the
types the Company produces entail an inherent risk of product
liability claims. Company products are often used in intensive
care settings with seriously ill patients. In addition, many of
the medical devices the Company manufactures and sells are
designed to be implanted in the human body for long periods of
time or indefinitely. A problem with a product can result in
product liability claims or a recall of, or safety alert or
advisory notice relating to, the product. Product liability
insurance remains available to the Company on terms consistent
with those available in prior periods. However, like many of its
industry peers, the Company has elected to increase
substantially the degree to which it self-insures for product
liability exposures. The decision does not affect coverage with
respect to claims made under previous policies. Guidant cannot
assure that insurance will be available or adequate to satisfy
future claims. (See Item 8, Note 16 to the
consolidated financial statements.)
Corporate History
Guidant incorporated in Indiana in September 1994 to be the
parent of several of the medical device and diagnostics
businesses of Eli Lilly and Company (Lilly). In December 1994,
Guidant consummated an initial public offering of a portion of
outstanding common shares. In September 1995, Lilly, by means of
a split-off, disposed of all of its remaining interests in
Guidant. Biographical information for executive officers is
provided in Item 10 and includes positions held with the
Company and Lilly.
Employees
As of December 31, 2004, Guidant had approximately
12,000 full-time employees, including approximately 3,400
employees outside the US. The Company maintains compensation,
benefits, equity participation and work environment policies
intended to assist in attracting and retaining qualified
personnel. Guidants success depends, in significant part,
on the ability to attract and retain such personnel. In
addition, the Company contracts for services where appropriate.
Contract labor provides management with flexibility, including
dealing with fluctuations in demand and new product transfers to
manufacturing.
9
None of the Companys employees is represented by a labor
union. The Company has never experienced an organized work
stoppage or strike and considers relations with employees to be
good. In five of the past seven years, Guidant has been named by
Fortune magazine as one of the 100 Best Companies
to Work For.
Guidant has adopted a Code of Business Conduct (available on
Guidants website, www.guidant.com) that applies to the
Companys Board of Directors and all employees.
Financial Information Relating to Classes of Products
Financial information relating to classes of products is
provided in Item 8, Note 12 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Financial Information Relating to Foreign and Domestic
Operations
Financial information relating to foreign and domestic
operations is provided in Item 8, Note 12 to the
consolidated financial statements. Additional information
concerning foreign exchange risks is provided in Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk, and Item 8, Note 13 to the consolidated
financial statements.
Local restrictions on the transfer of funds from abroad
(including the availability of dollar exchange) have not to date
been a significant deterrent to the Companys overall
operations abroad. A substantial portion of cash and cash
equivalents is held by the Companys non-US subsidiaries.
Additional information concerning the planned repatriation of
cash from a foreign affiliate is discussed in Item 8,
Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.
Available Information
Guidants web address is www.guidant.com. Guidants
electronic filings with the SEC (including all Forms 10-K,
10-Q, and 8-K and any amendments to these reports) are available
free of charge on the website as soon as reasonably practicable
after they are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Guidant has also posted the Board of Directors Corporate
Governance Guidelines, the charters of the boards audit,
nominating (governance) and compensation committees, and
the Companys Code of Business Conduct covering directors
and all employees on the website. These materials also are
available free of charge in print to shareholders who request
them in writing.
10
As of December 31, 2004, the Company owned or leased the
following principal operating facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate | |
|
Leased or | |
Location |
|
Type of Facility |
|
Square Feet | |
|
Owned | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Brussels, Belgium
|
|
Regulatory affairs, research and development, quality assurance,
administration and sales and marketing |
|
|
73,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Clonmel, Ireland
|
|
Cardiac Rhythm Management (CRM) and Vascular Intervention
(VI) manufacturing and administration |
|
|
181,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Dorado, PR
|
|
CRM, VI and Cardiac Surgery (CS) manufacturing and
administration |
|
|
182,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Indianapolis, IN
|
|
Administration |
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Redmond, WA
|
|
CRM research and development |
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Santa Clara, CA
|
|
CS manufacturing, VI, CS and Endovascular Solutions
(ES) research and development, administration, and sales
and marketing |
|
|
368,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
St. Paul, MN
|
|
CRM manufacturing, research and development, administration,
sales and marketing and warehouse |
|
|
1,398,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Temecula, CA
|
|
VI and ES manufacturing, VI, CRM and ES research and development |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
Owned |
|
Temecula, CA
|
|
VI, ES and CS warehouse and distribution |
|
|
186,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Tokyo, Japan
|
|
Regulatory affairs, research and development, quality assurance,
administration, sales and marketing and warehouse |
|
|
63,000 |
|
|
|
Leased |
|
Guidant maintains executive offices at 111 Monument Circle, 29th
Floor, Indianapolis, Indiana. Subject to normal expansion, the
Company believes that Company facilities are adequate to meet
present and reasonably foreseeable needs.
|
|
ITEM 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
The Company is subject to various legal proceedings, many
involving routine litigation incidental to the business. Other
matters contain allegations that are not routine and involve
compensatory, punitive, or treble damage claims, or claims for
injunctive relief related to alleged infringement of third
parties rights, or seek declarations affecting the
validity of Company patents. (See Item 8, Note 16 to
the consolidated financial statements.)
|
|
ITEM 4. |
Submissions of Matters to a
Vote of Security Holders |
During the fourth quarter of 2004, no matters were submitted to
a vote of security holders.
PART II
|
|
ITEM 5. |
Market for the
Registrants Common Equity and Related Shareholder
Matters |
Guidants common shares (the Companys only
outstanding equity shares) are traded on the New York Stock
Exchange (NYSE). The Companys annual CEO certification to
the NYSE for the previous year was submitted as of June 3,
2004.
11
|
|
ITEM 6. |
Selected Consolidated Financial
Data |
In millions, except per share and other data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 |
|
2004(1) | |
|
2003(2) | |
|
2002(3) | |
|
2001(4) | |
|
2000(5) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
$ |
3,765.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,644.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,120.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,636.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,464.3 |
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
921.6 |
|
|
|
877.4 |
|
|
|
742.0 |
|
|
|
612.9 |
|
|
|
570.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,844.0 |
|
|
|
2,767.4 |
|
|
|
2,378.9 |
|
|
|
2,023.9 |
|
|
|
1,894.0 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
516.0 |
|
|
|
515.0 |
|
|
|
410.5 |
|
|
|
355.2 |
|
|
|
318.7 |
|
Purchased in-process research and development
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales, marketing and administrative
|
|
|
1,191.0 |
|
|
|
1,189.0 |
|
|
|
938.4 |
|
|
|
778.6 |
|
|
|
698.7 |
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
573.0 |
|
|
|
419.3 |
|
|
|
669.3 |
|
|
|
538.5 |
|
|
|
397.2 |
|
Earnings per share basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
Earnings per share diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
312.04 |
|
|
|
305.10 |
|
|
|
301.74 |
|
|
|
300.86 |
|
|
|
301.10 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
321.24 |
|
|
|
312.52 |
|
|
|
305.99 |
|
|
|
306.22 |
|
|
|
310.11 |
|
Cash dividends declared per
share(6)
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Financial Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
2,679.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,017.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,437.4 |
|
|
$ |
759.2 |
|
|
$ |
453.1 |
|
Current ratio
|
|
|
3.6:1.0 |
|
|
|
2.9:1.0 |
|
|
|
2.7:1.0 |
|
|
|
2.0:1.0 |
|
|
|
1.6:1.0 |
|
Capital expenditures, net
|
|
|
212.8 |
|
|
|
249.3 |
|
|
|
141.1 |
|
|
|
149.1 |
|
|
|
159.9 |
|
Total assets
|
|
|
5,372.2 |
|
|
|
4,640.1 |
|
|
|
3,716.1 |
|
|
|
2,916.8 |
|
|
|
2,521.4 |
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
659.2 |
|
|
|
948.3 |
|
|
|
368.5 |
|
|
|
760.0 |
|
|
|
808.9 |
|
Borrowings as a percentage of total capitalization
|
|
|
15.0% |
|
|
|
25.9% |
|
|
|
13.7% |
|
|
|
33.0% |
|
|
|
40.6% |
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
3,742.1 |
|
|
|
2,713.3 |
|
|
|
2,321.8 |
|
|
|
1,545.8 |
|
|
|
1,183.5 |
|
Book value per share
|
|
$ |
11.65 |
|
|
$ |
8.68 |
|
|
$ |
7.59 |
|
|
$ |
5.05 |
|
|
$ |
3.82 |
|
Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
34.7% |
|
|
|
11.8% |
|
|
|
27.3% |
|
|
|
28.4% |
|
|
|
37.3% |
|
Full-time employee equivalents
|
|
|
14,491 |
|
|
|
13,578 |
|
|
|
12,540 |
|
|
|
12,076 |
|
|
|
10,452 |
|
Common shareholders of record
|
|
|
5,080 |
|
|
|
5,356 |
|
|
|
5,790 |
|
|
|
5,866 |
|
|
|
5,797 |
|
All financial information reflects the GALILEO and AAA product
lines and Brazil operations as discontinued operations.
Income from continuing operations and earnings per share
(EPS) include:
(1) 2004
|
|
|
|
|
In process research and development (IPRD) of $99.8
primarily includes: |
|
|
|
|
|
$50.0 million IPRD for clinical results related to
Biosensors Internationals (Biosensors) everolimus eluting
stent trial, FUTURE II |
|
|
|
$15.0 million IPRD payment made to Novartis Pharma AG and
Novartis AG for completion of enrollment in the SPIRIT FIRST
clinical trial |
|
|
|
$6.0 million IPRD payment to purchase the remaining
interest of Bioabsorbable Vascular Solutions (BVS) |
|
|
|
$22.8 million IPRD related to the acquisition of AFx, inc.,
a manufacturer of microwave surgical cardiac ablation medical
devices |
12
|
|
|
|
|
$20.0 million favorable litigation settlement with
Medtronic relating to atrial fibrillation technology |
|
|
|
$20.0 million contribution to the Guidant Foundation |
|
|
|
$66.0 million corporate-wide restructuring charge |
|
|
|
$54.3 million tax impact of items described above,
including a $104.2 million tax on the planned repatriation
of $1.5 billion under the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 |
(2) 2003
|
|
|
|
|
IPRD of $83.7 million primarily includes: |
|
|
|
|
|
$35.2 million IPRD recorded in conjunction with the
acquisition of certain bioabsorbable polymer technologies from
MediVas LLC |
|
|
|
$30.6 million IPRD related to the Biosensors acquisition
and the achievement of a performance milestone related to the
six-month clinical data of the everolimus eluting stent trial,
FUTURE I |
|
|
|
$16.0 million IPRD recorded in conjunction with the
acquisition of a majority interest in BVS |
|
|
|
$422.8 million net litigation charge primarily related to
the arbitration decision involving Cordis |
|
|
|
$168.3 million tax impact of items described above |
(3) 2002
|
|
|
|
|
IPRD of $54.9 million includes: |
|
|
|
|
|
$35.6 million IPRD for an exclusive license from Novartis
Pharma AG and Novartis AG for the right to utilize the drug
everolimus in drug eluting stents |
|
|
|
$19.3 million IPRD recorded in conjunction with the
acquisition of Cardiac Intelligence Corporation |
|
|
|
$137.1 million net litigation benefit resulting primarily
from a $158.2 million award plus interest and costs against
Medtronic |
|
|
|
$40.0 million contribution to the Guidant Foundation |
|
|
|
$60.6 million termination payment and related expenses
associated with the termination of the Cook Group Inc. merger
agreement |
|
|
|
$14.0 million for the restructuring of biliary and
peripheral product line operations |
|
|
|
$4.9 million tax impact of items described above |
(4) 2001
|
|
|
|
|
$15.0 million IPRD related to the acquisition of embolic
protection device technology from Metamorphic Surgical Devices,
LLC |
|
|
|
$7.5 million of expenses associated with the
first-generation VENTAK PRIZM® Implantable Defibrillator
field action |
|
|
|
$8.3 million tax impact of items described above |
(5) 2000
|
|
|
|
|
$127.0 million related to the write-off of an option to
acquire exclusive rights to certain experimental therapies for
the treatment of heart failure under development by Impulse
Dynamics |
|
|
|
$9.8 million tax impact |
|
|
(6) |
On February 14, 2005, Guidants Board of Directors
declared a first quarter 2005 dividend of $0.10 per common
share outstanding to be paid March 15, 2005, to
shareholders of record on March 1, 2005. |
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further
description of these items.
13
|
|
ITEM 7. |
Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and of Results of
Operations |
2004 OPERATING RESULTS
|
|
|
2004 SALES BY
PRODUCT |
|
2004 SALES BY GEOGRAPHY |
|
|
|
SALES SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US | |
|
Intl. | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
US | |
|
Intl. | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Growth | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implantable defibrillator systems
|
|
$ |
1,395.1 |
|
|
$ |
368.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,763.5 |
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
$ |
1,210.7 |
|
|
$ |
278.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,488.7 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Pacemaker systems
|
|
|
426.0 |
|
|
|
293.5 |
|
|
|
719.5 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
431.7 |
|
|
|
251.8 |
|
|
|
683.5 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Coronary stent systems
|
|
|
259.6 |
|
|
|
278.5 |
|
|
|
538.1 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
463.2 |
|
|
|
380.5 |
|
|
|
843.7 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
(36) |
% |
Angioplasty systems
|
|
|
210.0 |
|
|
|
242.5 |
|
|
|
452.5 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
203.3 |
|
|
|
220.3 |
|
|
|
423.6 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Cardiac surgery, biliary, peripheral and carotid systems
|
|
|
234.4 |
|
|
|
57.6 |
|
|
|
292.0 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
165.3 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
205.3 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,525.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,240.5 |
|
|
$ |
3,765.6 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
2,474.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,170.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,644.8 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
Guidant reported $3,765.6 million worldwide net sales for
the year ended December 31, 2004, representing 3% growth
compared to 2003. Growth in unit volume favorably impacted sales
by 2%, which was partially offset by a 1% decrease in pricing.
The impact of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates
increased sales by $88.0 million or 2%. Sales of products
other than worldwide coronary stents grew $426.4 million,
an increase of 15% compared to 2003. Sales growth was driven by
18% growth in implantable defibrillator system sales, which
accounted for 47% of Guidants 2004 worldwide sales. This
growth was partially offset by a 36% decrease in coronary stent
system sales primarily due to competitive drug eluting stents
and increased competition from metallic coronary stent
competitors in Japan. Coronary stents comprised 14% of Company
sales in 2004, compared to 23% in the prior year.
|
|
|
Implantable Defibrillator Systems |
Sales:
Sales of implantable defibrillator systems include both sales of
implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and CRT-D
systems. Worldwide sales of implantable defibrillator systems
for 2004 were $1,763.5 million, up $274.8 million or
18% over 2003. Growth was driven primarily by increased volume
and a shift toward higher-value CRT-D systems. US implantable
defibrillator system sales climbed 15% to $1,395.1 million,
14
while international sales of $368.4 million were up 33%
over the prior year. Sales of implantable defibrillator systems
increased due to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Increased awareness and adoption of ICD and cardiac
resynchronization therapies based on the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
Findings of two Guidant-sponsored clinical trials
MADIT II and COMPANION. MADIT II demonstrated that a
broader group of patients would benefit from ICD therapy. The
investigators for the COMPANION trial reported that for advanced
heart failure patients with desynchronized heart contractions,
the addition of resynchronization therapy to optimal drug
treatment reduced the combination of death and hospitalization
when compared with optimal drug treatment alone. This trial
demonstrated 20% reduction in combined all-cause death and
hospitalization by adding Guidants CRT-D systems to
optimal drug therapy and 36% reduction in all-cause mortality
for Guidants CRT-D systems for patients with advanced
heart failure. Based on the results of the COMPANION trial, the
FDA approved an expanded indication for Guidant CRT-D systems in
September 2004. This approval could make CRT-D systems available
to thousands more heart failure patients. Prior to this
approval, a patient needed to be indicated for both an ICD and
resynchronization therapy in order to receive a CRT-D system.
This approval expands the labeling to all patients with
moderate-to-severe heart failure with certain other patient
conditions. |
|
|
|
SCD-HeFT clinical trial and expanded national coverage. The
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institutes SCD-HeFT
clinical trial was completed in 2003 with the clinical trial
results published in the New England Journal of Medicine in
January 2005. The results demonstrated positive benefits of
implantable defibrillators (reducing death by 23% versus
patients who did not receive defibrillators and only received
standard drug therapy) in patients with heart failure. Based on
these results and other recent clinical trials, the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) expanded
national coverage to thousands of patients at risk for sudden
cardiac death in January 2005. |
|
|
|
RAPIDO
ADVANCEtm
delivery system and EASYTRAK® 2 and EASYTRAK 3 leads, which
received FDA approval and were launched in August 2004. These
products improve the physicians ability to implant leads
to the desired location. |
|
|
|
Strong market acceptance for CRT-D systems, specifically the
CONTAK RENEWAL family, CONTAK RENEWAL 3 and CONTAK RENEWAL 4. In
July 2004, Guidant received Conformité Européene
(CE) Mark approval of its CONTAK RENEWAL 4 AVT cardiac
resynchronization therapy defibrillator, designed to treat heart
failure patients who are at risk for sudden cardiac death and
also suffer from atrial arrhythmias. Sales also benefited from
continued acceptance of the VITALITY family of implantable
defibrillator systems, specifically the VITALITY DS and VITALITY
2 launched in the US in May 2004. |
Worldwide pacemaker system sales were $719.5 million in
2004 compared to $683.5 million in 2003, representing 5%
growth. Sales in the US totaled $426.0 million, a decrease
of 1% compared to 2003. International pacemaker system sales
grew 17% to $293.5 million, primarily due to volume and
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Pacemaker
system sales primarily include:
|
|
|
|
|
CONTAK RENEWAL TR 2 CRT-P system, launched in the third quarter
of 2003 in Europe, the CONTAK RENEWAL TR CRT-P system launched
in the US in January 2004, and |
|
|
|
INSIGNIA family of pacemakers, including significant sales
growth from the INSIGNIA ULTRA pacemaker system |
15
Sales:
Worldwide coronary stent system sales in 2004 were
$538.1 million, a decrease of 36% compared to 2003 sales of
$843.7 million. Modest quarterly sequential declines in
coronary stent system sales are expected until Guidant
introduces its own drug eluting stent. Coronary stent system
sales comprise 14% of sales in 2004, compared to 23% of sales in
2003. US coronary stent system sales were $259.6 million
($161.9 million to US end-users) in 2004 compared to
$463.2 million ($402.2 million to US end-users) in
2003. Increasing penetration of competitive drug eluting stents
in the US primarily drove the decline compared to 2003.
In February 2004, Guidant entered into an agreement with J&J
to co-promote Cordis CYPHER Sirolimus-eluting
Coronary Stent (CYPHER). This agreement also allows for
co-promotion of future drug eluting stents sold by J&J.
Co-promotion commissions earned by Guidant under this agreement,
along with sales of stent delivery technology to J&J, are
included in US coronary stent system sales. Revenues from
J&J were $97.7 million in 2004 compared to
$61.0 million in 2003.
International coronary stent system sales for 2004 and 2003 were
$278.5 million and $380.5 million. This decrease was
primarily due to declining stent sales in Japan as a result of
competitive metallic coronary stent launches since late 2003 and
the launch of CYPHER in the third quarter of 2004. Coronary
stent system sales in 2004 primarily include:
|
|
|
|
|
MULTI-LINK VISION® Coronary Stent System |
|
|
|
MULTI-LINK ZETA® Coronary Stent System, which received
Japan regulatory approval and was launched in July 2004 |
|
|
|
MULTI-LINK PENTA® Coronary Stent System |
|
|
|
MULTI-LINK PIXEL® Coronary Stent System |
|
|
|
MULTI-LINK MINI
VISIONtm
Coronary Stent System, which received FDA approval in September
2004 |
Angioplasty system sales totaled $452.5 million in 2004
compared to $423.6 million in 2003, representing 7% growth
primarily due to volume. During the second and third quarter of
2004, Guidant announced FDA approval and launched the
over-the-wire VOYAGER (OTW) and the rapid exchange VOYAGER
(RX) Coronary Dilatation Catheters. (See Item 7A,
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market
Risk, for information regarding a field action involving
the VOYAGER (RX) Coronary Dilatation Catheter.)
16
|
|
|
Cardiac Surgery, Biliary, Peripheral and Carotid
Systems |
Sales:
Worldwide sales of cardiac surgery, biliary, peripheral and
carotid systems totaled $292.0 million in 2004 compared to
$205.3 million in 2003, representing 42% growth. Sales were
driven by:
|
|
|
|
|
Continued growth in endoscopic vessel harvesting driven by the
VASOVIEW Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting Systems |
|
|
|
.035 Guidewire Platforms: ABSOLUTE Self Expanding Stent and
AGILTRAC Peripheral Dilatation Catheter |
|
|
|
RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System and the RX ACCUNET Embolic
Protection System for which Guidant was the first to receive FDA
approval in August 2004 |
Cost of Products Sold
Cost of products sold was $921.6 million in 2004 compared
to $877.4 million in 2003. Gross profit percentage was
75.5% in 2004 compared to 75.9% in 2003. The decrease in gross
profit percentages was primarily driven by the decrease in sales
of stents in the US and Japan, partially offset by a continued
sales mix shift toward higher value implantable defibrillator
systems, including CRT-D systems. Guidant has implemented a lean
manufacturing initiative across the cardiac rhythm management
product lines. This initiative is improving responsiveness of
the supply chain and helping to offset the Companys
decreasing gross profit percentage due to decreasing stent sales.
Research and Development
Innovation is essential to Guidants success. It is one of
the primary bases of competition in Guidants markets. The
Company works to introduce new products, enhance the
effectiveness and ease of use of existing products and expand
the applications for its products. The Companys investment
in R&D, as a percentage of sales, remained at historical
percentages. Research and development expense was
$516.0 million in 2004, or 13.7% of net sales, compared to
$515.0 million in 2003, or 14.1% of net sales. Significant
investments in research and development in 2004 included:
|
|
|
|
|
Guidants drug eluting stent programs: |
|
|
|
|
|
XIENCE V (formerly VISION-E) Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System,
which is currently being evaluated in the SPIRIT family of
clinical trials, which are expected to support filings to obtain
regulatory approval to market the product in the US and Europe. |
|
|
|
CHAMPIONtm
Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent mounted on the MULTI-LINK
VISION stent delivery system, which was discontinued in the
third quarter of 2004. |
|
|
|
Bioabsorbable and carotid stent systems |
|
|
|
Advanced Patient Management applications, designed to enable a
physician to monitor patient heart function remotely and
automatically. The first application,
LATITUDEtm,
will be launched in 2005. |
|
|
|
Clinical trials to further demonstrate the benefits of cardiac
resynchronization therapy devices for treating heart failure |
17
|
|
|
|
|
Development of next-generation devices for cardiac rhythm
management, biliary and peripheral systems and cardiac surgery
products |
In addition to funding internal research and development
efforts, Guidant also invests in early-stage technologies
through equity investments, acquisitions and other collaborative
vehicles.
Purchased In-Process Research and Development (IPRD)
Guidant recorded IPRD charges of $99.8 million and
$83.7 million in 2004 and 2003 for acquisitions and
subsequent milestones. Guidant records IPRD for the portion of
the purchase price representing the value of technologies
relating to products that have not received FDA approval and
have no alternative future use, excluding the value of core and
developed technologies. (See further information on business
combinations in Item 8, Note 4 to the consolidated
financial statements.) IPRD charges for 2004 included:
|
|
|
|
|
Biosensors International (Biosensors)$50.0 million
recorded during the second quarter of 2004 in conjunction with
milestones related to the FUTURE II clinical trial (See
further information regarding the CHAMPION program in Research
and Development). |
|
|
|
Novartis Pharma AG and Novartis AG$15.0 million
payment for completion of enrollment in the SPIRIT FIRST
clinical trial that occurred in April 2004. |
|
|
|
Bioabsorbable Vascular Solutions (BVS)$6.0 million
payment to purchase the remaining interest of BVS, an
early-stage developer of bioabsorbable stents, in April 2004.
Bioabsorbable stents are designed to be absorbed by tissue
following the restoration of blood flow in patients with
coronary artery disease. |
|
|
|
AFx, inc.$22.8 million associated with the February
2004 acquisition of AFx, inc., a manufacturer of microwave
surgical cardiac ablation medical devices. |
|
|
|
The remaining charges in 2004 were primarily for the purchase
of technology to be utilized in conjunction with Guidants
carotid embolic protection systems. |
IPRD charges in 2003 totaled $83.7 million and primarily
included:
|
|
|
|
|
MediVas LLC (MediVas) $35.2 million recorded in
September 2003 in conjunction with the acquisition of a
subsidiary of MediVas, including the right to use certain
bioabsorbable polymer technologies. |
|
|
|
Biosensors $20.5 million recorded in March 2003
for the purchase of certain assets of Biosensors
everolimus eluting stent program. In June 2003, Guidant recorded
a $10.1 million IPRD charge as a result of the achievement
of a performance milestone related to six-month clinical data of
the everolimus eluting stent trial, FUTURE I. (See further
information regarding the CHAMPION program in Research and
Development.) |
|
|
|
BVS$16.0 million recorded in March 2003 for the
purchase of a majority interest in BVS. |
The assets gained through Novartis, MediVas and Biosensors were
acquired to be key components of Guidants drug eluting
stent program. If the SPIRIT family of clinical trials is
successful, Guidant expects to enter the US market in the next
2-3 years. It is estimated that this project will incur
research and development expenses of approximately
$150.0 million to $200.0 million from 2005 through
completion to achieve commercial viability in the US.
Sales, Marketing and Administrative (SM&A)
SM&A expenses were $1,191.0 million in 2004, virtually
unchanged compared to 2003. SM&A expenses as a percentage of
sales decreased to 31.6% in 2004 compared to 32.6% in 2003
driven primarily by the reduction of expenses in the second half
of 2004 associated with the restructuring (See further
discussion below). A portion of this reduction is due to changes
in employee benefits that are not expected to recur in 2005.
SM&A expenses as a percentage of sales in 2005 are expected
to be more in line with the first half of 2004.
18
Total expenses included $30.9 million and
$53.5 million in 2004 and 2003 associated with restricted
stock awards. The expense was higher in 2003 primarily due to
the share price performance measures achieved in 2003 and early
2004, which accelerated the expense. (See Item 8,
Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.) These
expenses were classified in the income statement consistent with
the functional area of related employees.
Interest
The components of interest, net are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
(In millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
$ |
(33.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(23.5 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net
|
|
$ |
(8.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties
Royalty expense is incurred for sales of certain implantable
defibrillator systems, pacemaker systems, coronary stent systems
and angioplasty systems. Net royalty expense totaled
$50.0 million in 2004 compared to $59.7 million in
2003. Net royalty expense included royalty income of less than
$1.0 million in both years presented. The decrease in
royalty expense was primarily due to the December 2003
expiration of a Mirowski patent covering certain implantable
defibrillator products. At December 31, 2004, the Company
had accrued $60.1 million, which represents all royalties
and interest potentially payable under the license agreement
pertaining to that patent. The ultimate payment by Guidant will
depend on a final ruling regarding the patent. (See Item 8,
Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.)
Amortization
Amortization expense was $30.7 million in 2004 compared to
$20.6 million in 2003. The increase of $10.1 million
was attributable to the intangibles recorded in conjunction with
the February 2004 acquisition of AFx, inc. and the June 2003
acquisition of X Technologies, Inc.
Other, net
Other, net expense was $21.1 million in 2004 compared to
$7.7 million in 2003. The additional expense in 2004
compared to 2003 is primarily due to equity investments
($14.1 million in 2004 compared to $5.1 million in
2003) that were considered permanently impaired in 2004 and an
increase in losses on disposal of fixed assets
($8.7 million in 2004 compared to $0.7 million in
2003).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
(In millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Other expense
|
|
$ |
27.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
$ |
21.1 |
|
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation and Foundation Contribution
In 2004 the Company recorded a $20.0 million litigation
benefit from a settlement with Medtronic related to atrial
fibrillation technology. Concurrently, this litigation benefit
was contributed to the Guidant Foundation. The Company recorded
a $422.8 million net litigation expense in the second
quarter of 2003 related to the decision of an arbitration panel
in a matter involving Cordis. That decision became final in the
third quarter of 2003, with payment made in the fourth quarter
of 2003. (See Item 8, Note 15 to the consolidated
financial statements.)
19
Restructuring
On July 21, 2004, Guidants Board of Directors
approved a corporate-wide restructuring and realignment that
included work force reductions, cessation of certain capital
projects and contract terminations, resulting primarily from the
weakness in the metallic coronary stent market. The expense
associated with this plan was $66.0 million and includes
severance and benefits packages for affected employees of
$42.7 million, expense associated with the accelerated
vesting of stock-based compensation (stock options and
restricted stock) for affected employees of $7.1 million,
impairment of property, plant and equipment of
$6.5 million, relocation expenses of $4.4 million,
contract termination costs of $3.9 million and other
related costs of $1.4 million. The restructuring allowed
the Company to redirect investment to its strategic imperatives
of heart failure therapy, drug eluting stent development and
distribution.
Income Tax
Income tax expense for 2004 and 2003 was $304.8 million and
$55.9 million, resulting in effective income tax rates of
34.7% and 11.8%. The effective income tax rate in 2004 is
comparable to the US statutory rates because the benefit from
overseas operations was offset by the tax recorded in
conjunction with the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the
Act). The effective tax rate in 2003 is lower than the US
statutory rates primarily due to the litigation settlement in
2003 that was deductible at the US statutory tax rates, the
benefit from overseas operations and the agreement reached with
the US and foreign tax authorities with respect to various
issues in the examination of tax years 1996-2000, resulting in a
decrease in accrued taxes by $30.0 million.
The Act was signed into law on October 22, 2004 and
provides a one-time elective incentive to repatriate foreign
earnings by providing an 85% dividends received deduction
(DRD) reducing the effective federal income tax rate on
such earnings from 35% to 5.25%. The repatriation incentive
requires CEO approval of a domestic reinvestment plan, and is
subject to numerous restrictions. In the fourth quarter, the
Companys CEO approved a domestic reinvestment plan to
repatriate approximately $1.5 billion of cash held outside
the US, via an extraordinary dividend during 2005. Pursuant to
the approved domestic reinvestment plan, Guidant expects to use
the repatriated cash to fund growth opportunities through
investment in research and development and capacity expansion.
The Companys evaluation of specific provisions of the Act
will continue as guidance from the US Treasury and US Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) is issued. The Company recorded a tax
liability of $104.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2004
in connection with the planned repatriation, as prior to that
time, deferred income taxes had not been provided for
undistributed earnings because they were intended to be
indefinitely reinvested in operations outside the US. This tax
liability includes a provision of $29.4 million related to
the gross-up on the portion of the dividend subject to the 85%
DRD. As enacted, the Act does not expressly provide for the
reduction of the gross-up by the 85% DRD. In November 2004,
technical corrections legislation was introduced in both
chambers of Congress to permit reducing the gross-up by the 85%
DRD. If the legislation is enacted as introduced, the Company
will reverse the provision of $29.4 million in the quarter
the legislation is enacted.
The Act also provides a deduction for qualified domestic
production activities such as manufacturing. The Company is
evaluating these provisions of the Act. The Companys
preliminary assessment is that the deduction will not have a
material impact on the Companys effective income tax rate.
During 2003, the Company reached agreement with US and foreign
tax authorities with respect to various issues in the
examination of tax years 1996-2000. The Company decreased its
previous estimate for accrued taxes by $30.0 million in the
fourth quarter of 2003 to reflect the resolution of these
audits. In December 2003, the IRS proposed adjustments to
certain previously filed tax returns. The Company believes it
has meritorious defenses of its tax filings and will vigorously
defend them at the IRS appellate level or through litigation in
the courts. While no assurance can be provided as to the
ultimate resolution of outstanding tax issues, the positions
taken by the IRS are not expected to have a significant impact
on the effective tax rate in future periods. The Company has
accrued for probable liabilities resulting from tax assessments
by tax authorities.
20
Discontinued Operations
In March 2004, Guidants Board of Directors approved a plan
to discontinue the GALILEO® Intravascular Radiotherapy
System (GALILEO System) product line for the treatment of
in-stent restenosis due to the significant competitive impact of
drug eluting stents. On April 21, 2004, Guidant signed a
definitive agreement with Novoste Corporation (Novoste) to
cooperate in assisting existing US and Canadian customers of the
GALILEO System who wish to transition to Novoste products.
Guidant received $2.5 million upon signing and the
agreement provides for earn-out payments up to a maximum of
$4.0 million based on Novoste sales in the US and Canada.
The disposal plan consists primarily of the termination of
normal activity, abandonment of property and equipment, product
returns, collection of accounts receivable and settlement of
liabilities.
In December 2003, Guidants Board of Directors ratified a
plan to discontinue Guidants operations in Brazil due to
unfavorable business conditions and poor operating performance.
In June 2003, Guidants Board of Directors approved a plan
to dispose of the ANCURE ENDOGRAFT® System
(ANCURE) product line to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms
(AAA) due to continuing financial losses, limited prospects
for the Companys AAA product line and the impact of the US
Department of Justice investigation. (See Item 8,
Note 16 to the consolidated financial statements.)
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets, these disposals represent discontinued
operations. Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial
statements and notes reflect the results of operations and
financial position of the GALILEO and AAA product lines and the
Brazil operations as discontinued operations for all periods
presented.
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes for the
year ended December 31, 2004 primarily includes charges of
$37.9 million for estimated ANCURE-related settlements,
write down of long-lived assets to fair value, severance related
charges and recording inventory and accounts receivable at net
realizable value. Loss from discontinued operations before
income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2003, includes
a $62.4 million charge for the agreement with the US
Department of Justice surrounding the ANCURE product line for
the treatment of AAA (See Item 8, Note 16 to the
consolidated financial statements), a charge of
$37.9 million, primarily related to the write down of
long-lived assets to fair value, severance-related charges and
recording inventory and accounts receivable at net realizable
value and a gain of $20.0 million for a payment made from
Cook in exchange for granting a covenant not to sue related to
Cooks manufacture and distribution of Cooks
endovascular graft products. The Company does not expect any
significant activity associated with the exit of these three
businesses during 2005, except for potential litigation charges.
The following summarizes the financial information for
discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
(In millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
72.2 |
|
|
$ |
118.7 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
118.0 |
|
|
|
81.3 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
21
2003 OPERATING RESULTS
|
|
|
2003 SALES BY PRODUCT |
|
2003 SALES BY GEOGRAPHY |
|
|
|
SALES SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
|
2002 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
US | |
|
Intl. | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
US | |
|
Intl. | |
|
Total | |
|
|
|
Growth | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
(In millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implantable defibrillator systems
|
|
$ |
1,210.7 |
|
|
$ |
278.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,488.7 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
|
$ |
821.7 |
|
|
$ |
185.1 |
|
|
$ |
1,006.8 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
Pacemaker systems
|
|
|
431.7 |
|
|
|
251.8 |
|
|
|
683.5 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
413.7 |
|
|
|
222.9 |
|
|
|
636.6 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
Coronary stent systems
|
|
|
463.2 |
|
|
|
380.5 |
|
|
|
843.7 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
628.5 |
|
|
|
292.4 |
|
|
|
920.9 |
|
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Angioplasty systems
|
|
|
203.3 |
|
|
|
220.3 |
|
|
|
423.6 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
195.2 |
|
|
|
195.6 |
|
|
|
390.8 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Cardiac surgery, biliary,
peripheral and carotid systems
|
|
|
165.3 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
205.3 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
138.4 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
165.8 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,474.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,170.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,644.8 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
2,197.5 |
|
|
$ |
923.4 |
|
|
$ |
3,120.9 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
Guidant reported $3,644.8 million worldwide net sales for
the year ended December 31, 2003, representing 17% sales
growth compared to 2002. Growth in unit volume and price
increases favorably impacted sales by 12% and 1%. The impact of
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates increased sales
by $131.2 million or 4%. Sales growth was driven by 48%
growth in implantable defibrillator system sales, which
accounted for 41% of Guidants 2003 worldwide sales. This
growth was partially offset by an 8% decrease in coronary stent
system sales primarily due to the launch of competitive drug
eluting stents in Europe and the US in 2003.
|
|
|
Implantable Defibrillator Systems |
Worldwide sales of implantable defibrillator systems for 2003
were $1,488.7 million, up $481.9 million or 48% over
2002. US implantable defibrillator system sales climbed 47% to
$1,210.7 million, while international sales of
$278.0 million were up 50% over the prior year. Implantable
defibrillator system sales were driven by:
|
|
|
|
|
Growth of the implantable defibrillator market following
announcement of the MADIT II clinical trial results |
|
|
|
Strong acceptance for CRT-D systems Guidants
first CRT-D system received FDA approval in May 2002 |
|
|
|
Positive acceptance of the VITALITY family of implantable
defibrillator systems |
Worldwide pacemaker system sales were $683.5 million in
2003 compared to $636.6 million in 2002, representing 7%
growth. Sales in the US totaled $431.7 million, an increase
of 4% over 2002. International pacemaker system sales grew 13%
to $251.8 million, primarily due to fluctuations in foreign
currency exchange rates. Pacemaker system sales include sales of
CRT-P systems and were driven by:
|
|
|
|
|
Continued acceptance of the INSIGNIA family of pacemaker systems |
|
|
|
|
|
FDA approval of INSIGNIA ENTRA Pacemaker Systems in the first
quarter of 2003 |
22
|
|
|
|
|
European launch of INSIGNIA Ultra and INSIGNIA AVT Pacemaker
Systems in the third quarter of 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
Broad acceptance of Guidants second-generation CRT-P
system, the CONTAK RENEWAL TR 2, launched in the third
quarter of 2003 in Europe |
|
|
|
Significant additions to the cardiac rhythm management US sales
force |
Worldwide coronary stent system sales in 2003 were
$843.7 million, a decrease of 8% compared to 2002 sales of
$920.9 million. US coronary stent system sales were
$463.2 million ($402.2 million to US end-users) in
2003 compared to $628.5 million ($575.5 million to US
end-users) in 2002. The decline of US coronary stent system
sales was primarily driven by increasing penetration of
competitive drug eluting stents in the US. US end-user coronary
stent system sales (which exclude the sales to Cordis) in 2003
accounted for 11% of Guidants worldwide revenues compared
to 18% in 2002. International sales of coronary stent systems in
2003 grew 30% to $380.5 million compared to
$292.4 million in 2002, primarily attributable to unit
volume growth in Japan.
Angioplasty system sales totaled $423.6 million in 2003
compared to $390.8 million in 2002, representing 8% growth.
Key product sales were driven by the Rapid-Exchange
(RX) CROSSSAIL® and Over-The-Wire
(OTW) OPENSAIL® Coronary Dilatation Catheters.
|
|
|
Cardiac Surgery, Biliary, Peripheral and Carotid
Systems |
Worldwide sales of cardiac surgery, biliary, peripheral and
carotid systems totaled $205.3 million in 2003 compared to
$165.8 million in 2002, representing 24% growth.
Cost of Products Sold
Cost of products sold was $877.4 million in 2003 compared
to $742.0 million in 2002, representing gross profit
percentages of 75.9% compared to 76.2% in 2002. The gross profit
percentage decreased in 2003 compared to 2002 due to previously
discussed changes in product sales mix and the impact of foreign
currency hedge losses, partially offset by increased
manufacturing efficiencies. The foreign currency hedge losses
recorded in cost of products sold partially offset the increase
in sales caused by the weakening US dollar and served to
mitigate the net impact of foreign currency fluctuations on net
earnings. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2003, the
Company recorded $11.0 million of expense related primarily
to scrap of work-in-process and finished goods inventory
containing a specific third-party-supplied component.
Research and Development
Research and development expense was $515.0 million in
2003, or 14.1% of net sales, compared to $410.5 million in
2002, or 13.2% of net sales. Significant investments in research
and development in 2003 included:
|
|
|
|
|
Drug eluting stent research and development |
|
|
|
Advanced Patient Management applications, designed to enable
physicians to monitor patient heart function remotely and
automatically |
|
|
|
Clinical trials to support the benefits of cardiac
resynchronization therapy devices for treating heart failure |
|
|
|
Development of next-generation devices for cardiac rhythm
management and cardiac surgery products |
23
Purchased In-Process Research and Development (IPRD)
Guidant recorded IPRD charges of $83.7 million (described
in detail earlier) and $54.9 million in 2003 and 2002 for
acquisitions and subsequent milestone payments. (See further
information on business combinations in Item 8, Note 4
to the consolidated financial statements.) IPRD charges in 2002
totaled $54.9 million and included:
|
|
|
|
|
Novartis Pharma AG and Novartis AG (Novartis)
Guidant recorded an IPRD charge of $35.6 million for an
exclusive license from Novartis granting Guidant rights to
utilize the drug, everolimus, in drug eluting stents for the
treatment of coronary and peripheral vascular diseases and
providing Guidant the right to sublicense. |
|
|
|
Cardiac Intelligence Corporation (CIC) In December
2002, the Company completed its acquisition of CIC for
$19.3 million for a portfolio of intellectual property in
the field of ambulatory, remote, wireless monitoring of the
heart functions of patients, including those implanted with
devices such as pacemakers, defibrillators and resynchronization
devices. |
Sales, Marketing and Administrative
SM&A expenses were $1,189.0 million in 2003, an
increase of $250.6 million or 26.7% compared to 2002.
SM&A expenses as a percentage of sales increased to 32.6% in
2003 compared to 30.1% in 2002 driven primarily by sales growth,
resulting in increased sales commissions and continued expansion
of the US sales force, including field clinical personnel in the
US who support clinicians.
Total expenses increased by $53.5 million as a result of
restricted stock grants made under the 2003 performance-based
equity compensation program, including accelerated vesting based
upon the attainment of Company share price appreciation targets.
These expenses were classified in the income statement
consistent with the functional area of related employees.
Approximately two-thirds of the share price appreciation targets
were achieved and expensed in 2003. The final share price
appreciation target was achieved in January 2004.
Interest
The components of interest, net are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
(In millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Interest income
|
|
$ |
(23.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(20.1 |
) |
Interest expense
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net
|
|
$ |
(6.3 |
) |
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Royalties
Net royalty expense totaled $59.7 million in 2003 compared
to $50.9 million in 2002. Net royalty expense included
royalty income of less than $1.0 million in both years.
Royalty expense is incurred for sales of certain implantable
defibrillator systems, pacemaker systems, coronary stent systems
and angioplasty systems. The $8.8 million increase in 2003
was primarily due to increased sales of implantable
defibrillator systems.
Amortization
Amortization expense was $20.6 million in 2003 compared to
$12.3 million in 2002. The increase of $8.3 million
was primarily driven by Guidants acquisition of X
Technologies, Inc. in June 2003. A portion of the purchase price
was allocated to the intangible assets related to the
FDA-approved FX miniRAIL® Dilatation Catheter.
Other, net
Net other expenses were $7.7 million in 2003 and were
comprised primarily of equity investment write-offs and losses
on foreign exchange contracts. Net other expenses were
$12.6 million in 2002, comprised primarily
24
of fixed asset and equity investment write-offs and losses on
foreign exchange contracts. Other, net includes the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
(In millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Other expense
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
$ |
7.7 |
|
|
$ |
12.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation and Foundation Contribution
The Company recorded $422.8 million in net litigation
expense in the second quarter of 2003. The Company accrued
$425.0 million in that quarter based on the decision of an
arbitration panel in a matter involving Cordis. That decision
became final in the third quarter of 2003, with payment made in
the fourth quarter of 2003. In 2002, Guidant recorded a net
legal benefit of $137.1 million resulting from a
$158.2 million award against Medtronic, partially offset by
other minor settlements. (See Item 8, Note 15 to the
consolidated financial statements.) Concurrently,
$40.0 million of this litigation benefit was contributed to
the Guidant Foundation.
Income Tax
Income tax expense for 2003 and 2002 was $55.9 million and
$251.2 million, resulting in effective income tax rates of
11.8% and 27.3%. The effective tax rate in 2003 is lower than
the US statutory rates primarily due to the litigation
settlement in 2003 that was deductible at the US statutory tax
rates, the benefit from overseas operations and the agreement
reached with the US and foreign tax authorities with respect to
various issues in the examination of tax years 1996-2000,
resulting in a decrease in accrued taxes by $30.0 million.
The effective tax rate in 2002 was lower than the US statutory
tax rates, primarily due to the benefit for overseas operations.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
Cash and cash equivalents and short-term
investments(1)
|
|
$ |
2,214.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,468.2 |
|
Working capital
|
|
$ |
2,679.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,017.5 |
|
Current ratio
|
|
|
3.6:1.0 |
|
|
|
2.9:1.0 |
|
Net cash
position(2)
|
|
$ |
1,555.1 |
|
|
$ |
519.9 |
|
Days receivable outstanding
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Inventory turnover
|
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
2.38 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Short-term investments consist primarily of highly rated
commercial paper with maturities greater than three months.
Similar investments with maturities of less than three months
are included in cash and cash equivalents. |
|
(2) |
Net cash position is the sum of cash and cash equivalents and
short-term investments less total debt. |
25
Summary of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
(In millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$ |
1,135.6 |
|
|
$ |
406.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,044.2 |
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(672.7 |
) |
|
|
(392.5 |
) |
|
|
(219.6 |
) |
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(66.8 |
) |
|
|
380.6 |
|
|
|
(353.2 |
) |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
426.0 |
|
|
$ |
453.4 |
|
|
$ |
577.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004/2003
Net cash provided by operating activities was
$1,135.6 million in 2004, an increase of
$728.8 million primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
$425.0 million litigation payment made to Cordis in 2003 |
|
|
|
$157.0 million change in cash provided by improved
inventory management in 2004 |
|
|
|
$69.8 million additional tax payments in 2003 compared to
2004 |
Net cash used for investment activities was $672.7 million
in 2004, an increase of $280.2 million compared to prior
year primarily due to $320.1 net purchases of short-term
investments. The majority of these short-term investments are
interest-bearing investments with maturities between three and
six months.
Net cash used for financing activities was $66.8 million in
2004, a change of $447.4 million primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
$289.3 million net payments on borrowings in 2004 compared
to an increase in borrowings of $579.1 million in 2003 |
|
|
|
$51.6 million increase in dividends paid in 2004 |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
$329.1 million increase in cash provided by issuances of
common stock primarily for stock option exercises |
|
|
|
$143.5 million decrease in repurchases of common stock |
2003/2002
Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by
$637.4 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to
the following payments made in 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
$425.0 million litigation payment made to Cordis |
|
|
|
$92.4 million payment to settle the ANCURE litigation |
|
|
|
$50.0 million fee paid to Cook in connection with the
termination of the merger described in Item 8, Note 15
to the consolidated financial statements |
Net cash used in investing activities increased by
$172.9 million in 2003 primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
$108.2 million increase in net additions of property and
equipment and other assets, including the termination of a lease
and purchase of the related land and buildings |
|
|
|
$63.6 million for the acquisition of X Technologies, Inc. |
26
Net cash provided by financing activities was
$380.6 million in 2003, compared to net cash used of
$353.2 million in 2002, a change of $733.8 million due
to:
|
|
|
|
|
$579.1 million increase in borrowings in 2003 compared to
net payments of $393.1 million in 2002 |
|
|
|
$106.7 million increase in issuances of common stock for
stock option exercises |
partially offset by:
|
|
|
|
|
$271.4 million increase in repurchase of common stock
including $250.0 million related to the stock buy-back
program of 4.7 million shares and $21.4 million
related to shares withheld from restricted stock recipients upon
vesting to satisfy related tax obligations |
|
|
|
$73.7 million in dividend payments in 2003 |
The effect of exchange rate changes on cash decreased
$47.1 million in 2003 compared to 2002, primarily due to
decreasing Euro cash holdings in 2003 compared to 2002.
Cash Commitments
Scheduled payments at December 31, 2004 include the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year | |
|
1-3 Years | |
|
4-5 Years | |
|
Thereafter | |
|
Total | |
(In millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Total borrowings
|
|
$ |
302.0 |
|
|
$ |
357.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
659.2 |
|
Other noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
189.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
50.4 |
|
|
|
244.2 |
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
104.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
333.3 |
|
|
$ |
587.0 |
|
|
$ |
29.3 |
|
|
$ |
58.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,007.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other items that are material to understanding the
Companys cash requirements and are not in the table above,
have either been previously discussed, are contingent on future
revenue streams or are purchases in the normal course of
business. Such items are typically not enforceable or legally
binding or are subject to change based on management business
decisions.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had outstanding
borrowings of $659.2 million at a weighted average interest
rate of 3.41%, including bank borrowings, commercial paper,
$350.0 million principal balance in long-term notes due in
2006 and interest rate swap agreements valued at
$2.7 million. Bank borrowings represent short-term
uncommitted credit facilities with commercial banks. The
commercial paper borrowings are supported by two credit
facilities aggregating $900.0 million. There are currently
no outstanding borrowings under these facilities. The Company
classified $302.0 million as short-term debt at
December 31, 2004. The Company believes that cash and cash
equivalent balances will be adequate to fund maturities of
short-term borrowings, obligations to make interest payments on
its debt and other anticipated operating cash needs for 2005,
including planned capital expenditures of approximately
$425.0 million in 2005. The planned repatriation of
$1.5 billion of cash, currently held outside the US, during
2005 will help fund this expansion. The expected increase in
capital expenditures is primarily due to planned investments in
manufacturing equipment and facilities in Ireland and California
to support Guidants drug eluting stent initiatives and to
support continued cardiac rhythm management sales growth.
Certain of Guidants acquisitions involve contingent
consideration. Contingent consideration will be recorded when
the amount is determinable and will be allocated to the fair
value of the intangibles or IPRD, with any amounts paid above
fair value of identifiable assets recorded as goodwill. In
addition to contingent consideration, certain equity investments
made by Guidant in other entities may involve contingent
payments, which would provide additional ownership to Guidant
(both collectively referred to as milestone
payments). These milestone payments are generally
contingent upon reaching performance-related milestones,
including specified revenue levels, product development targets
or regulatory approvals or filings. At December 31, 2004,
Guidants accrual for milestone obligations totaled
$33.3 million, which is expected to be paid during the next
27
two years. In addition, future undiscounted performance-related
milestone payments of up to $243.0 million could be paid
through 2010, depending on when and if milestones are attained.
Potential milestone payments under existing agreements during
the next 12 months range from $25.0 million to
$71.0 million, of which management currently estimates
$33.0 million could result in IPRD charges if paid. The
Company continues to evaluate business development
opportunities, which may generate additional payments.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This
Statement is a revision to SFAS 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
SFAS 123(R) requires the measurement of the cost of
employee services received in exchange for an award of equity
instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The
cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee
is required to provide service in exchange for the award. No
compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which
employees do not render service. The Company will adopt
SFAS 123(R) on July 1, 2005, requiring compensation
cost to be recorded as expense for the portion of outstanding
unvested awards, based on the grant-date fair value of those
awards calculated using Black-Scholes option pricing model under
SFAS 123 for pro forma disclosures. Based on unvested stock
options currently outstanding and the expense that will be
associated with the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the effect of
adopting SFAS 123(R), absent the effect of the pending
J&J merger, will reduce the Companys net income by
approximately $14.4 million in the second half of 2005.
Upon Company shareholder approval of the merger with J&J,
the majority of the equity outstanding immediately vests and
becomes exercisable.
Critical Accounting Estimates
It is important to understand Guidants accounting policies
and estimates in order to understand its financial statements.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements in accordance
with US generally accepted accounting principles, management
must often make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and
related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and
during the reporting period. Some of those judgments can be
subjective and complex. Consequently, actual results could
differ from those estimates. Management considers an accounting
estimate to be critical if:
|
|
|
|
|
It requires assumptions to be made that were uncertain at the
time the estimate was made; and |
|
|
|
Changes in the estimate are reasonably likely to occur from
period to period as new information becomes available, or use of
different estimates that Guidant reasonably could have used in
the current period, could have a material effect on
Guidants consolidated results of any one period. |
Guidant continually evaluates the accounting policies and
estimates it uses to prepare the consolidated financial
statements. In cases where management estimates are used, they
are based on historical experience, information from third-party
professionals and various other assumptions believed to be
reasonable. Management has discussed the development and
selection of these critical accounting estimates with
Guidants Audit Committee and the Audit Committee has
reviewed the foregoing disclosure. In addition, there are other
items within Guidants financial statements that require
estimation, but are not deemed critical as based on the criteria
above. Changes in estimates used in these and other items could
have a material impact on Guidants financial statements in
any one period.
The accounting policies that are most subject to important
estimates or assumptions include those described below. See
Item 8, Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements for further description of these items.
Inventory Reserves The Company values its inventory
at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market.
Reserves are estimated for excess, slow moving and obsolete
inventory as well as inventory with a carrying value in excess
of its net realizable value. Write-offs are recorded when
product is destroyed. The Company reviews inventory on hand at
least quarterly and records provisions for excess and obsolete
inventory based on several factors including current assessment
of future product demand, anticipated release of new
28
products into the market, historical experience and product
expiration. The Companys industry is characterized by
rapid product development and frequent new product
introductions. Uncertain timing of product approvals,
variability in product launch strategies, product recalls and
variation in product utilization all impact the estimates
related to excess and obsolete inventory.
Valuation of Purchased In-Process Research and Development
(IPRD), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets When a
business combination occurs, the purchase price is allocated
based upon the fair value of tangible assets, IPRD, goodwill and
intangible assets. The Company recognizes IPRD in business
combinations for the portion of the purchase price allocated to
the appraised value of in-process technologies, defined as those
technologies relating to products that have not received FDA
approval and have no alternative future use. The portion
assigned to in-process technologies excludes the value of core
and developed technologies, which are recognized as intangible
assets when purchased. Valuations require the use of significant
estimates. The amount of the purchase price allocated to IPRD is
determined by estimating future cash flows of the technology and
discounting net cash flows back to present values. The Company
considers, among other things, the projects stage of
completion, complexity of the work completed as of the
acquisition date, costs already incurred, projected costs to
complete, contribution of core technologies and other acquired
assets, expected introduction date and the estimated useful life
of the technology. The discount rate used to arrive at a present
value as of the date of acquisition is based on the time value
of money and medical technology investment risk. Goodwill
represents the excess of cost over fair value of identifiable
net assets of the business acquired and the amount allocated to
IPRD. The methodologies used in arriving at these estimates are
in accordance with accepted valuation methods.
Income Taxes All income tax amounts reflect the use
of the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets
and liabilities are determined based on the expected future tax
consequences of temporary differences between the carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax
reporting purposes.
Guidant operates in multiple tax jurisdictions with different
tax rates and must determine the allocation of income to each of
these jurisdictions based on estimates and assumptions. In the
normal course of business, the Company will undergo scheduled
reviews by taxing authorities regarding the amount of taxes due.
These reviews include questions regarding the timing and amount
of deductions and the allocation of income among various tax
jurisdictions. Tax reviews often require an extended period of
time to resolve and may result in income tax adjustments if
changes to the allocation are required between jurisdictions
with different tax rates.
Guidant records its tax provisions based on the existing laws,
experience with previous settlement agreements, the status of
current IRS (and other taxing authorities) examinations and
managements understanding of how the tax authorities view
certain relevant industry and commercial matters. Although the
Company has recorded all probable income tax accruals in
accordance with SFAS 5, Accounting for Contingencies,
and SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, these
accruals represent accounting estimates that are subject to
inherent uncertainties associated with the tax audit process
and, therefore, include certain contingencies. The Company
adjusts these accruals in light of changing facts and
circumstances, such as the progress of a tax audit. The Company
believes that any potential tax conclusion will not have a
material adverse impact on Guidants consolidated financial
position or liquidity. However, it may be material to
Guidants consolidated results of operations of a future
period.
Legal Proceedings and Other Loss Contingencies The
Company is subject to various legal proceedings, many involving
routine litigation incidental to the business. Other matters
contain allegations that are not routine and involve
compensatory, punitive or treble damage claims, or claims for
injunctive relief related to alleged infringement of a third
partys patents, or seek declarations affecting the
validity of the Companys patents. Litigation outcomes are
not within the Companys complete control, are often very
difficult to predict and often are resolved over long periods of
time. Estimating probable losses requires the analysis of
multiple possible outcomes that often depends on judgments about
potential actions by third parties. Contingencies are recorded
in the consolidated financial statements, or otherwise
disclosed, in accordance with SFAS 5, Accounting for
Contingencies.
29
|
|
ITEM 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk |
The overall objective of Guidants financial risk
management policy is to reduce the potential negative earnings
effect from the impact of fluctuating foreign currencies and
interest rates. The primary feature of Guidants risk
management philosophy is that all hedging activity must be
designed to reduce financial risks associated with commercial
and financial transactions that arise in the ordinary course of
business. Guidant utilizes foreign exchange forward contracts
and interest rate swap agreements to minimize the impact of
fluctuating foreign currencies and interest rates. The contracts
are initiated within the guidelines of documented corporate risk
management policies. Guidant does not use financial instruments
for speculative or trading activities.
Foreign Exchange Risk
Due to Guidants commitment to a global presence and
customer support, the Company conducts a portion of its business
in various foreign currencies (primarily the currencies of
Europe and Asia) and, as a result, a portion of revenues and
earnings is exposed to changes in foreign exchange rates. Such
exposures arise from transactions denominated in foreign
currencies, primarily intercompany loans and cross-border sales
of inventory, as well as from the translation of results of
operations from outside the US. The Company seeks to manage its
foreign exchange risk in part through operational means,
including managing local currency assets in relation to local
currency liabilities.
Foreign exchange risk is also managed through the use of foreign
exchange contracts. The fair value of all foreign exchange
contracts outstanding was ($33.4) million and
($46.8) million at December 31, 2004 and 2003. An
analysis was prepared to estimate the sensitivity of the fair
value of all foreign exchange contracts to hypothetical 10%
favorable and unfavorable changes in exchange rates at
December 31, 2004 and 2003. The results of the estimation,
which may vary from actual results, are as follows:
Fair Value of Foreign Exchange Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
(In millions) |
|
| |
|
| |
10% adverse rate movement
|
|
$ |
(96.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(97.4 |
) |
At year-end rates
|
|
$ |
(33.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(46.8 |
) |
10% favorable rate movement
|
|
$ |
29.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
Any gains and losses in fair value of foreign exchange contracts
would be largely offset by losses and gains on underlying
transactions or anticipated transactions. These offsetting gains
and losses are not reflected in the above table.
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys financial instruments are exposed to interest
rate risk. During 2004, Guidant had two interest rate swap
agreements to modify the interest characteristic of the
principal amount of its long-term notes so that the interest
payable on long-term notes effectively becomes variable and thus
matches the variable interest rate received from its cash.
Accordingly, interest rate fluctuations impact the
Companys long-term notes outstanding, which are offset by
corresponding changes in the fair value of the interest rate
swap agreements. Since the Company is in a net cash position,
the interest rate swap agreements reduce exposure to floating
rate risk. An analysis of the impact on the Companys
interest rate sensitive financial instruments to a hypothetical
10% change in short-term interest rates compared to interest
rates at year-end showed no significant impact on earnings or
cash. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements was
$2.7 million at December 31, 2004.
30
Regulatory and Other Matters
See Item 1, Healthcare Cost Containment and
Third-Party Reimbursement and Government Regulation.
Field Actions
The Company continually collects and analyzes information about
product performance through field observations and other quality
metrics to determine if a field action is necessary. Following
this process, from time to time, the Company initiates field
actions with respect to market-released products. These actions
may include product recalls or communications with a significant
number of physicians about a product or labeling issue. The
scope of such actions can range from very minor issues affecting
a small number of units to more significant actions. Since the
Companys last filing on Form 10-Q, the Company
conducted the following field action:
In late January 2005, Guidant voluntarily withdrew VOYAGER
(RX) Coronary Dilatation Catheters of sizes 1.5 mm to 3.5
mm to address the potential for a leak at the guidewire exit
notch. While the probability of a leak is low, the Company is
pursuing root cause analysis and corrective actions. FDA and
affected international regulatory agencies have been notified.
Cautionary Factors
Certain statements included in this filing are forward-looking,
including accounting estimates, expectations with respect to
announced transactions, statements concerning pricing and sales
trends, drug eluting stent development, recovery of tax assets
and the outcome of other tax matters, capital expenditures, cash
flows, costs of research programs, the timing of discontinued
operations and the timing of product developments. The
statements are based on assumptions about many important
factors, including assumptions concerning:
|
|
|
|
|
Coronary stent business developments: Drug eluting stents
present a significant growth opportunity; however, the earlier
introduction of drug eluting stents by the Companys
competitors has substantially affected metallic coronary stent
sales and will continue to impact the Companys financial
results. |
|
|
|
ICD system growth driven by continued developments in future
clinical science, publication of clinical results, reimbursement
decisions and new competition. |
|
|
|
Managements progress regarding the lean manufacturing
effort across cardiac rhythm management product lines. |
|
|
|
The effects of operating in an industry subject to complex
regulation, the necessity for appropriate reimbursement of
therapies and the significance of legal claims in Guidants
industry. |
|
|
|
Changes in the location or volume of production or changes in
tax law. |
|
|
|
Progress in closing the pending merger with J&J, including
satisfaction of conditions to closing, such as antitrust and
shareholder approvals and other customary closing conditions. |
|
|
|
Product development and production factors (including the
uncertainties associated with clinical trials), competitive
factors (including the introduction of new products and
alternative therapies), business development factors, internal
factors (including the retention of key employees and changes in
business strategies) and others, all as further described in
Exhibit 99 to this filing. |
Actual results may differ materially. The Company does not
undertake to update its forward-looking statements.
31
|
|
ITEM 8. |
Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data |
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
Consolidated Financial Statements of Guidant Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
32
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
3,765.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,644.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,120.9 |
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
921.6 |
|
|
|
877.4 |
|
|
|
742.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
2,844.0 |
|
|
|
2,767.4 |
|
|
|
2,378.9 |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
516.0 |
|
|
|
515.0 |
|
|
|
410.5 |
|
Purchased in-process research and development
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
|
54.9 |
|
Sales, marketing and administrative
|
|
|
1,191.0 |
|
|
|
1,189.0 |
|
|
|
938.4 |
|
Interest, net
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
|
|
(6.3 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
Royalties, net
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
|
|
59.7 |
|
|
|
50.9 |
|
Amortization
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Litigation, net
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
422.8 |
|
|
|
(137.1 |
) |
Foundation contribution
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
Cook charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
877.8 |
|
|
|
475.2 |
|
|
|
920.5 |
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
304.8 |
|
|
|
55.9 |
|
|
|
251.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
|
573.0 |
|
|
|
419.3 |
|
|
|
669.3 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(49.0 |
) |
|
|
(89.0 |
) |
|
|
(57.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
524.0 |
|
|
$ |
330.3 |
|
|
$ |
611.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
33
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31 |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS |
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
1,894.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,468.2 |
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
320.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $22.0 (2004) and
$24.0 (2003)
|
|
|
845.9 |
|
|
|
822.9 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
353.9 |
|
|
|
401.9 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
215.1 |
|
|
|
313.2 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
77.8 |
|
|
|
57.7 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
3,707.9 |
|
|
|
3,079.9 |
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill, net
|
|
|
511.7 |
|
|
|
512.9 |
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
168.8 |
|
|
|
160.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
36.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Investments
|
|
|
81.5 |
|
|
|
55.1 |
|
Sundry
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
Other assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Assets
|
|
|
855.4 |
|
|
|
811.1 |
|
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of
$780.4 (2004) and $657.0 (2003)
|
|
|
808.9 |
|
|
|
749.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
5,372.2 |
|
|
$ |
4,640.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$ |
56.2 |
|
|
$ |
85.7 |
|
Employee compensation
|
|
|
141.3 |
|
|
|
198.7 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
284.8 |
|
|
|
306.9 |
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
220.5 |
|
|
|
197.2 |
|
Short-term debt
|
|
|
302.0 |
|
|
|
250.0 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
|
1,028.7 |
|
|
|
1,062.4 |
|
Noncurrent Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
357.2 |
|
|
|
698.3 |
|
Other
|
|
|
244.2 |
|
|
|
166.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Noncurrent Liabilities
|
|
|
601.4 |
|
|
|
864.4 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized shares: 50,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued shares: none
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, no par value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized shares: 1,000,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued shares: 320,692,000(2004)
312,129,000(2003)
|
|
|
609.1 |
|
|
|
301.5 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
344.6 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
2,657.6 |
|
|
|
2,258.9 |
|
Deferred cost, ESOP
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
(36.9 |
) |
|
|
(25.2 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares: 3,158,000(2003)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(171.2 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
180.3 |
|
|
|
124.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
3,742.1 |
|
|
|
2,713.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
|
$ |
5,372.2 |
|
|
$ |
4,640.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
34
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Additional | |
|
|
|
Deferred Cost, ESOP | |
|
|
|
|
|
Other | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Paid-In | |
|
Retained | |
|
| |
|
Treasury | |
|
Unearned | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
|
|
|
Issued Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Capital | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Stock | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Income/(Loss) | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
December 31, 2001
|
|
|
309,019,000 |
|
|
$ |
226.1 |
|
|
$ |
182.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,390.5 |
|
|
|
(4,578,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(30.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(149.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(73.8 |
) |
|
$ |
1,545.8 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
611.8 |
|
|
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
694.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance/cancellation of common stock under stock plans
|
|
|
(27,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
Stock issued through Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
ESOP transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
951,000 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
Tax benefits from employee stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2002
|
|
|
308,992,000 |
|
|
|
226.1 |
|
|
|
200.7 |
|
|
|
2,002.3 |
|
|
|
(3,627,000 |
) |
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
|
|
(92.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
2,321.8 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
330.3 |
|
|
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under stock plans
|
|
|
2,637,000 |
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
(36.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209.7 |
|
Stock issued through Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.3 |
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(271.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(271.8 |
) |
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73.7 |
) |
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(25.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25.2 |
) |
ESOP transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,059,000 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
Tax benefits from employee stock plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
312,129,000 |
|
|
|
301.5 |
|
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
2,258.9 |
|
|
|
(2,568,000 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
|
|
(171.2 |
) |
|
|
(25.2 |
) |
|
|
124.0 |
|
|
|
2,713.3 |
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524.0 |
|
|
Other comprehensive gain, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock under stock plans
|
|
|
8,175,000 |
|
|
|
287.8 |
|
|
|
(73.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
291.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
506.0 |
|
Stock issued through Employee Stock Purchase Plan
|
|
|
388,000 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128.3 |
) |
Cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(125.3 |
) |
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.7 |
) |
ESOP transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
679,000 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
Tax benefits from employee stock plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
320,692,000 |
|
|
$ |
609.1 |
|
|
$ |
344.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,657.6 |
|
|
|
(1,889,000 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.6 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(36.9 |
) |
|
$ |
180.3 |
|
|
$ |
3,742.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
35
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31 |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
524.0 |
|
|
$ |
330.3 |
|
|
$ |
611.8 |
|
|
|
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Cash Provided by
Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
142.2 |
|
|
|
129.8 |
|
|
|
114.4 |
|
|
|
Amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
Provision for inventory and accounts receivable losses
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
|
|
|
72.7 |
|
|
|
Purchased in-process research and development
|
|
|
99.8 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
(63.0 |
) |
|
|
(45.0 |
) |
|
|
Compensation associated with equity programs
|
|
|
86.3 |
|
|
|
101.8 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
Other noncash, net
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
(22.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,005.3 |
|
|
|
682.7 |
|
|
|
836.7 |
|
|
|
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables
|
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(76.6 |
) |
|
|
(63.1 |
) |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
|
|
(123.2 |
) |
|
|
(80.1 |
) |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(13.5 |
) |
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(76.7 |
) |
|
|
25.2 |
|
|
|
89.3 |
|
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
163.4 |
|
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
98.8 |
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
(76.3 |
) |
|
|
185.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
1,135.6 |
|
|
|
406.8 |
|
|
|
1,044.2 |
|
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions of property and equipment, net
|
|
|
(212.8 |
) |
|
|
(249.3 |
) |
|
|
(141.1 |
) |
|
|
Acquisitions of business, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(51.4 |
) |
|
|
(63.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of in-process research and development
|
|
|
(52.1 |
) |
|
|
(74.8 |
) |
|
|
(54.2 |
) |
|
|
Net (purchases) maturities of short-term investments
|
|
|
(320.1 |
) |
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
Net purchases of equity investments
|
|
|
(34.6 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
Additions of other assets, net
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(10.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Used for Investing Activities
|
|
|
(672.7 |
) |
|
|
(392.5 |
) |
|
|
(219.6 |
) |
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in borrowings, net
|
|
|
(289.3 |
) |
|
|
579.1 |
|
|
|
(393.1 |
) |
|
|
Issuance of common stock under stock plans and other capital
transactions
|
|
|
476.1 |
|
|
|
147.0 |
|
|
|
40.3 |
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
(125.3 |
) |
|
|
(73.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchase of common stock
|
|
|
(128.3 |
) |
|
|
(271.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities
|
|
|
(66.8 |
) |
|
|
380.6 |
|
|
|
(353.2 |
) |
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
|
105.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
426.0 |
|
|
|
453.4 |
|
|
|
577.0 |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
1,468.2 |
|
|
|
1,014.8 |
|
|
|
437.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year
|
|
$ |
1,894.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,468.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,014.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
36
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
Note 1 |
Business and Nature of Operations |
Guidant Corporation pioneers lifesaving technology for millions
of cardiac and vascular patients worldwide. Guidant develops,
manufactures and markets the following products and services
that enable less-invasive care for some of lifes most
threatening medical conditions:
|
|
|
|
|
Implantable defibrillator systems used to detect and treat
abnormally fast heart rhythms (tachycardia) that could
result in sudden cardiac death (SCD), including implantable
cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) systems
used to treat heart failure |
|
|
|
Implantable pacemaker systems used to manage slow or irregular
heart rhythms (bradycardia), including implantable cardiac
resynchronization therapy pacemaker (CRT-P) systems used to
treat heart failure |
|
|
|
Coronary stent systems for the treatment of coronary artery
disease |
|
|
|
Angioplasty systems including dilatation catheters, guidewires
and related accessories for the treatment of coronary artery
disease |
|
|
|
Cardiac surgery systems for the treatment of coronary artery
disease and performing cardiac surgical ablation, and biliary,
peripheral and carotid systems used to treat biliary and artery
disease |
Guidant has principal operations in the US, Europe and Asia. The
Company markets its products in nearly 100 countries through a
direct sales force in the US and a combination of direct sales
representatives and independent distributors in international
markets. As used herein, the terms the Company and
Guidant mean Guidant Corporation and its
consolidated subsidiaries.
On December 15, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement
and plan of merger with Johnson & Johnson (J&J)
pursuant to which J&J will acquire the Company for
approximately $25.4 billion in fully diluted equity value.
Under the terms of the agreement, each Company common share will
be exchanged for $30.40 in cash and $45.60 in J&J stock,
provided that the average J&J common stock price is between
$55.45 and $67.09 during the fifteen-day trading period ending
three days prior to the transaction closing. Accordingly, each
Guidant share will be converted into not more than .8224 and not
less than .6797 of a J&J common share, plus $30.40 in cash.
The boards of directors of the Company and J&J have approved
the transaction, which remains subject to the approval of the
Companys shareholders, clearance under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act, the European
Union merger control regulation, and other customary closing
conditions.
|
|
Note 2 |
Significant Accounting Policies |
Principles of Consolidation The consolidated
financial statements include the accounts of Guidant and all of
its wholly owned subsidiaries. Significant intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Revenue Recognition Guidant sells products through
a direct sales force in the US and a combination of direct sales
representatives and independent distributors internationally. A
significant portion of revenue is generated from inventory
carried by Guidants sales representatives and consigned
inventory held by customers, which is recognized as revenue upon
notification of implant or product usage. All other revenue
transactions are recorded upon transfer of title and risk of
loss to customers. There are no remaining obligations that
affect the customers final acceptance of the sale upon
transfer of title. Estimated sales returns, discounts and
rebates are recorded as a reduction of sales when the related
revenue is recognized. The Company provides credit to its
customers in the normal course of business and maintains an
allowance for doubtful customer accounts. Actual losses are
charged to this allowance when incurred.
37
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Research and Development Research and development
costs are charged to expense as incurred. In-process research
and development (IPRD) is recognized in business
combinations or asset acquisitions for the portion of the
purchase price allocated to the appraised value of in-process
technologies, defined as those technologies relating to products
that have not received FDA approval and have no alternative
future use, consistent with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) 2, Accounting for Research and
Development Costs, and Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation 4, Applicability of SFAS 2 to
Business Combinations. The portion assigned to in-process
technologies excludes the value of core and developed
technologies, which are recognized as intangible assets when
purchased. Valuations require the use of significant estimates.
The amount of the purchase price allocated to IPRD is determined
by discounting the estimated amount of future net cash flows
from the technology to its present value. The discount rate used
is determined at the time of the acquisition and includes, among
other things, consideration of the assessed risk of the project
not being developed to a stage of commercial feasibility.
Foreign Currency Translation Sales and expenses
denominated in foreign currencies are translated at average
exchange rates in effect during the year. Assets and liabilities
of foreign operations are translated into US dollars using
the exchange rates in effect at year end. Foreign currency
transaction gains and losses are included in the consolidated
statements of income within other, net. Adjustments
arising from the translation of net assets located outside the
US (gains and losses) are shown as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income.
Risk Management Contracts The Company recognizes
all derivative financial instruments in the consolidated
financial statements at fair value in accordance with
SFAS 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities. The Company employs foreign exchange
forward contracts and interest rate swap agreements to manage
its earnings exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates and interest rates.
Forward contracts hedging forecasted transactions are designated
as cash flow hedges and recorded as assets or liabilities at
fair value. Changes in the forward contracts fair value
are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income until
they are recognized in earnings concurrently with the gains and
losses arising from the underlying hedged transactions. If the
forecasted transaction does not occur, or it becomes probable
that it will not occur, the gain or loss on the related hedge is
recognized in earnings at that time. The ineffective portion of
a contracts change in fair value is immediately recognized
in earnings. These gains and losses are classified in the income
statement consistent with the accounting treatment of the item
being hedged.
Forward contracts hedging specific foreign currency denominated
assets or liabilities are recorded at their fair value with the
related gains and losses included in other, net on
the income statement. Results of these forward contracts offset
in full or in part the gains and losses from the mark to market
of the underlying balance sheet exposure. Guidant has interest
rate swap agreements that are designated and qualify as fair
value hedges and meet the short-cut method requirements of
SFAS 133. As a result, changes in the fair value of the
interest rate swap agreements are offset by changes in long-term
notes. These changes are reported in interest expense;
accordingly, no net gain or loss is recognized in earnings.
Cash and Cash Equivalents All highly liquid
investments with maturities of three months or less are
considered to be cash equivalents. These investments are valued
at cost, which approximates fair value.
Investments Investments in debt and equity
securities that have readily determinable fair values are
classified and accounted for as available-for-sale or
held-to-maturity. Held-to-maturity investments consist
principally of government debt securities that management has
the intent and ability to hold until maturity. These securities
are carried at amortized cost. Available-for-sale securities are
carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses recorded
as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive
income. Realized gains are calculated based on the specific
identification method and recorded in other, net on
the income
38
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
statement. All other investments are accounted for under the
cost or equity method and are written off upon identification of
declines in value that are other than temporary.
Inventories Inventories are stated at the lower of
cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Reserves are
estimated for excess, slow moving and obsolete inventory as well
as inventory with a carrying value in excess of its net
realizable value. Write-offs are recorded when product is
destroyed. The Company reviews inventory on hand at least
quarterly and records provisions for excess and obsolete
inventory based on several factors, including current assessment
of future product demand, anticipated release of new products
into the market, historical experience and product expiration.
There have been no significant sales of inventory for which a
provision was previously established and provisions and
write-offs have historically had a strong correlation.
Inventories at December 31 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Finished products
|
|
$ |
181.2 |
|
|
$ |
172.9 |
|
Work-in-process
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
|
81.5 |
|
Raw materials and supplies
|
|
|
108.2 |
|
|
|
147.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
353.9 |
|
|
$ |
401.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in inventories was primarily due to lean
manufacturing initiatives across the cardiac rhythm management
product lines, in part aimed at improving inventory management.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets Goodwill
represents the excess of cost over fair value of identifiable
net assets of businesses acquired. Other intangible assets
consist primarily of purchased technology and patents. Goodwill
is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently as
impairment indicators arise. The test for impairment involves
the use of estimates related to the fair values of
Guidants four reporting units based on projected
discounted cash flows. If the fair value is calculated to be
less than the carrying amount, an impairment charge is recorded
in the period identified. Other intangible assets are amortized
using the straight-line method over their estimated useful
lives, of which periods of up to nine years remain.
Property and Equipment Property and equipment are
stated at historical cost. Additions and improvements are
capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are
charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the
straight-line method at rates intended to depreciate the cost of
assets over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to
40 years. Property and equipment at December 31
consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Land
|
|
$ |
44.7 |
|
|
$ |
44.6 |
|
Buildings
|
|
|
470.5 |
|
|
|
392.9 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
981.2 |
|
|
|
850.1 |
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
118.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,589.3 |
|
|
|
1,406.1 |
|
Less allowances for depreciation
|
|
|
780.4 |
|
|
|
657.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
808.9 |
|
|
$ |
749.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets Management periodically reviews
the carrying amount of property and equipment and other
intangible assets to assess potential impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amount
may not be recoverable. The determination includes evaluation of
factors such as current market value, future asset utilization,
business climate, and future cash flows expected to result from
the use of the related assets. The Companys policy is to
use undiscounted cash flows in assessing potential
39
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
impairment and to record an impairment loss in the period when
it is determined that the carrying amount of the asset may not
be recoverable.
Product Warranties Provisions for estimated
expenses related to product warranties are recorded at the time
the products are sold. Estimates for warranty costs are
calculated based primarily upon historical warranty experience,
but may include assumptions related to anticipated changes in
warranty costs and failure rates. A summary of the changes in
the product warranty activity is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
January 1
|
|
$ |
22.3 |
|
|
$ |
18.8 |
|
Provisions for product warranties
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
Settlements during the period
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
$ |
20.1 |
|
|
$ |
22.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes All income tax amounts reflect the
use of the liability method. Under this method, deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on the expected
future tax consequences of temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial and
income tax reporting purposes.
Earnings Per Share Earnings per share-basic is
computed by dividing net income by the weighted average common
shares outstanding during the year. Earnings per share-diluted
represents net income divided by the sum of the weighted average
common shares outstanding plus potential dilutive instruments
such as stock options and unvested restricted stock. The effect
of stock options on earnings per share-diluted is determined
through the application of the treasury stock method, whereby
proceeds received by the Company based on assumed exercises are
hypothetically used to repurchase the Companys common
stock at the average market price during the period. Stock
options that would have an anti-dilutive effect on earnings per
share are excluded from the calculations.
40
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Stock-Based Compensation The Company has adopted
the disclosure-only provisions of SFAS 123, Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS 148,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and
Disclosure. Accordingly, the Company accounts for
stock-based compensation under Accounting Principles Board
(APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees, and related interpretations, using the
intrinsic value method. The following table illustrates the
effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123
to all stock-based employee compensation. The fair value of
stock options was estimated as of the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model, the attribution method, a
forfeiture rate of approximately 10% and the assumptions
described in Note 5. These pro forma amounts may not be
representative of the effects on reported net income for future
years due to the uncertainty of stock option grant volume and
potential changes in assumptions driven by market factors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Reported net
income(1)
|
|
$ |
524.0 |
|
|
$ |
330.3 |
|
|
$ |
611.8 |
|
Deduct: Stock-based compensation not reflected in net income,
net of tax
|
|
|
66.5 |
(2) |
|
|
64.3 |
|
|
|
94.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income
|
|
$ |
457.5 |
|
|
$ |
266.0 |
|
|
$ |
517.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic-as reported
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic-pro forma
|
|
$ |
1.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted-as reported
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted-pro forma
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Reported amounts include expense associated with the restricted
stock awards. See Note 5 for additional information. |
|
(2) |
Includes $12.0 million of pro forma expense for a one-time
grant of immediately vested options as bonus payments at
December 31, 2004. |
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued SFAS 123(R), Share-Based Payment. This
Statement is a revision to SFAS 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion
No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.
SFAS 123(R) requires the measurement of the cost of
employee services received in exchange for an award of equity
instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The
cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee
is required to provide service in exchange for the award. No
compensation cost is recognized for equity instruments for which
employees do not render service. The Company will adopt
SFAS 123(R) on July 1, 2005, requiring compensation
cost to be recognized as expense for the portion of outstanding
unvested awards, based on the grant-date fair value of those
awards calculated using Black-Scholes option pricing model under
SFAS 123 for pro forma disclosures. Based on unvested stock
options currently outstanding and the expense that will be
associated with the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, the effect of
adopting SFAS 123(R), absent the effect of the pending
J&J merger, will reduce the Companys net income by
approximately $14.4 million in the second half of 2005.
Use of Estimates Preparation of the consolidated
financial statements in conformity with US generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements. Actual results could differ from these
estimates.
41
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts in
the consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to
conform to the current year presentation. In March 2004, the
Company approved a plan to discontinue the GALILEO Intravascular
Radiotherapy System (GALILEO System) product line for the
treatment of in-stent restenosis. The GALILEO System product
line is reflected as discontinued operations for all periods
presented.
|
|
Note 3 |
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Goodwill at December 31 consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
Intermedics, Inc. |
|
$ |
341.7 |
|
|
$ |
342.9 |
|
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
102.1 |
|
InControl, Inc. |
|
|
53.9 |
|
|
|
53.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
511.7 |
|
|
$ |
512.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets at December 31 consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
Carrying | |
|
|
Original Cost | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X Technologies, Inc.
|
|
$ |
88.7 |
|
|
$ |
19.4 |
|
|
$ |
69.3 |
|
Intermedics, Inc.
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
AFx, inc.
|
|
|
36.9 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
33.8 |
|
Other licensed technologies and distribution agreements
|
|
|
122.8 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
276.4 |
|
|
$ |
107.6 |
|
|
$ |
168.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X Technologies, Inc.
|
|
$ |
88.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
81.9 |
|
Intermedics, Inc.
|
|
|
28.0 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
Other licensed technologies and distribution agreements
|
|
|
125.8 |
|
|
|
61.1 |
|
|
|
64.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
242.5 |
|
|
$ |
81.7 |
|
|
$ |
160.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense was $30.7 million, $20.6 million
and $12.3 million for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002. The annual estimated amortization expense
for intangible assets will be approximately $30.0 million
for the five-year period ending December 31, 2009.
|
|
Note 4 |
Business Combinations and Other Purchase Transactions |
AFx, inc.: On February 9, 2004, Guidant acquired
AFx, inc., a manufacturer of microwave surgical cardiac ablation
medical devices. Guidant paid $48.4 million (including
transaction expenses) in cash and forgave a $5.8 million
extension of credit. The purchase price was allocated to the
acquired assets and liabilities based upon fair market values,
including a $22.8 million in process research and
development (IPRD) charge for technology that had not
reached technological feasibility and had no alternative use and
$32.1 million for intangible assets related to proven
technology. In addition, a deferred tax liability of
$11.9 million was recorded for the tax effect of the
intangible assets and deferred tax assets of $11.7 million
were recorded for the net operating loss carryovers. In order to
value the IPRD, a risk-adjusted discount rate of 22.5% was
42
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
applied to the cash flows. In August 2004, Guidant obtained FDA
clearance for the minimally invasive cardiac ablation
indication, resulting in an additional payment of
$3.0 million. This payment increased intangible assets and
deferred tax liabilities by $4.8 million and
$1.8 million. Guidant may make additional milestone
payments upon future satisfaction of regulatory, clinical and
sales performance criteria.
MediVas LLC (MediVas): In September 2003, Guidant
acquired a subsidiary of MediVas, including rights to certain
bioabsorbable polymer technologies. The agreement provided
Guidant with an exclusive worldwide license to these
bioabsorbable polymer products, related pre-clinical and
clinical data, and intellectual property for use with drugs in
the olimus family, as well as a nonexclusive license
for use with other drugs. Guidant recorded a $35.2 million
IPRD charge in connection with the purchase, since technological
feasibility of the project had not been attained and the
research had no alternative future uses. MediVas may receive
additional milestone payments over the course of clinical
development and receive royalties on future sales of licensed
products utilizing MediVas technology.
X Technologies, Inc. (X Technologies): In June 2003,
Guidant acquired X Technologies, the manufacturer of the
FDA-approved FX miniRAIL Dilatation Catheter, a device for the
treatment of coronary artery disease. Guidant paid
$60.0 million in cash and forgave a $4.5 million
extension of credit. The purchase price was allocated to the
acquired assets and liabilities based upon fair market values,
including $88.7 million to intangible assets related to
developed technology and the related deferred tax liability of
$32.8 million.
Biosensors International (Biosensors): In March 2003,
Guidant recorded a $20.5 million IPRD charge in connection
with the acquisition of certain assets of Biosensors
everolimus eluting stent program, including an exclusive
worldwide license to Biosensors polymer formulation
technology in the field of everolimus eluting stents and a
nonexclusive license to use this technology with other drugs in
drug eluting stents. Additionally, as part of this
consideration, Guidant acquired the option of manufacturing and
commercializing Biosensors everolimus eluting stent
platform that has been used in Biosensors FUTURE I and II
Clinical Trials. In June 2003, Guidant recorded a
$10.1 million IPRD charge as a result of the achievement of
a performance milestone related to six-month clinical data of
the everolimus eluting stent trial, FUTURE I. An additional IPRD
charge of $50.0 million was recorded in the second quarter
of 2004 for clinical results related to Biosensors
everolimus eluting stent trial, FUTURE II. This was
recorded as IPRD since technological feasibility of the project
had not been attained and the research had no alternative future
uses.
Bioabsorbable Vascular Solutions (BVS): In March 2003,
Guidant acquired the majority interest in BVS for
$10.0 million and accrued an additional $6.0 million
for a future clinical milestone. In addition, Guidant purchased
the remaining 49% interest for $6.0 million in April 2004.
All these amounts are accounted for as IPRD, since technological
feasibility of the project has not been attained and the
research has no alternative future uses. BVS is developing
vascular stent platforms designed to be absorbed by tissue
following the restoration of blood flow in patients with
coronary artery disease. The project is expected to be completed
and the products to be commercially available in 3 to
6 years. Guidant may pay milestone payments over the course
of clinical development.
Novartis Pharma AG and Novartis AG (Novartis): In 2002,
Guidant entered into an agreement with Novartis that provided
Guidant an exclusive worldwide license to use everolimus in drug
eluting stents, resulting in a $35.6 million IPRD charge.
In the second quarter of 2004, a payment of $15.0 million
was made to Novartis for completion of enrollment in the SPIRIT
FIRST clinical trial. This amount was recorded as IPRD, since
technological feasibility of the project has not been attained
and the research has no alternative future uses. Novartis may
receive additional milestone payments over the course of
clinical development and receive royalties on future sales of
licensed products utilizing everolimus.
Cardiac Intelligence Corporation (CIC): In December 2002,
the Company completed its acquisition of CIC for
$19.3 million. This acquisition supplemented Guidants
Advanced Patient Management applications, with a portfolio of
intellectual property in the field of ambulatory, remote,
wireless monitoring of the heart functions
43
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
of patients, including those implanted with devices such as
pacemakers, defibrillators and resynchronization devices. The
Company anticipates commercial availability of this technology
on a worldwide basis in 2005. The entire purchase price was
recorded as IPRD.
The income approach was used to establish the fair values of
IPRD. This approach establishes fair value by estimating the
after-tax cash flows attributable to the in-process project over
its useful life and discounting these after-tax cash flows to
present value.
Revenue estimates were based on estimates of overall demand for
similar products and therapies, expected growth rates, expected
trends in technology and expected product introductions by
competitors. The Company considered, among other things, the
projects stage of completion, complexity of the work
completed as of the acquisition date, costs already incurred,
projected costs to complete, contribution of core technologies
and other acquired assets, expected introduction date and the
estimated useful life of the technology. The discount rate used
to arrive at a present value as of the date of acquisition was
based on the time value of money and medical technology
investment risk. The Company believes that the estimated
purchased research and development amounts recorded represent
fair value at the date of the acquisition. The Company continues
to move forward with the acquired research and development
projects discussed above, with the exception of Biosensors,
where the Company continues to focus on the bioabsorbable
polymer, but has discontinued development of Biosensors
everolimus eluting stent.
Certain of Guidants acquisitions involve contingent
consideration. Contingent consideration will be recorded when
the amount is determinable and will be allocated to the fair
value of the intangibles or IPRD, with any amounts paid above
fair value of identifiable assets recorded as goodwill. In
addition to contingent consideration, certain equity investments
made by Guidant in other entities may involve contingent
payments, which would provide additional ownership to Guidant
(both collectively referred to as milestone
payments). These milestone payments are generally
contingent upon reaching performance-related milestones,
including specified revenue levels, product development targets
or regulatory approvals or filings. At December 31, 2004,
Guidants accrual for milestone obligations totaled
$33.3 million, which is expected to be paid during the next
two years. In addition, future undiscounted performance-related
milestone payments of up to $243.0 million could be paid
through 2010, depending on when and if milestones are attained.
Potential milestone payments under existing agreements during
the next 12 months range from $25.0 million to
$71.0 million, of which management currently estimates
$33.0 million could result in IPRD charges if paid. The
Company continues to evaluate business development
opportunities, which may generate additional payments.
The operating results of all acquisitions are included in the
Companys consolidated financial statements from the date
of each acquisition.
The Company may periodically grant nonqualified stock options
and restricted stock grants to outside members of its Board of
Directors and consultants, and may grant incentive stock
options, nonqualified stock options, performance shares and
restricted stock grants to employees, including executive
officers of the Company. Grants to employees are consistent with
Guidants commitment to recognize and reward employees and
enable them to participate as shareholders.
Stock options are granted at 100% of the fair value of the
underlying stock at the date of grant and have 10-year terms.
The stock options granted to outside directors typically vest
and become fully exercisable at the next annual meeting. The
majority of other stock options granted by the Company vest and
become fully exercisable three to five years from the date of
grants or vest in increments over three to five years.
44
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Stock option activity is summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Options | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at January 1
|
|
|
44,840,534 |
|
|
$ |
39.30 |
|
|
|
49,836,773 |
|
|
$ |
38.38 |
|
|
|
52,113,348 |
|
|
$ |
38.41 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
4,886,886 |
|
|
|
64.58 |
|
|
|
885,878 |
|
|
|
38.53 |
|
|
|
1,152,811 |
|
|
|
36.10 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(12,475,088 |
) |
|
|
36.08 |
|
|
|
(4,531,773 |
) |
|
|
27.99 |
|
|
|
(963,959 |
) |
|
|
25.31 |
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(918,428 |
) |
|
|
41.87 |
|
|
|
(1,350,344 |
) |
|
|
43.55 |
|
|
|
(2,465,427 |
) |
|
|
43.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31
|
|
|
36,333,904 |
|
|
$ |
43.74 |
|
|
|
44,840,534 |
|
|
$ |
39.30 |
|
|
|
49,836,733 |
|
|
$ |
38.38 |
|
|
Exercisable at December 31
|
|
|
27,820,167 |
|
|
$ |
42.20 |
|
|
|
29,670,014 |
|
|
$ |
38.84 |
|
|
|
26,458,259 |
|
|
$ |
35.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Remaining Contractual | |
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Life (Years) | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$ 3.63-$10.00
|
|
|
509,694 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
7.76 |
|
|
|
509,694 |
|
|
$ |
7.76 |
|
$10.01-$17.00
|
|
|
1,213,018 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
10.99 |
|
|
|
1,213,018 |
|
|
|
10.99 |
|
$17.01-$30.00
|
|
|
388,975 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
24.40 |
|
|
|
287,641 |
|
|
|
22.55 |
|
$30.01-$39.00
|
|
|
12,832,483 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
32.16 |
|
|
|
10,374,654 |
|
|
|
32.32 |
|
$39.01-$60.00
|
|
|
17,003,338 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
50.67 |
|
|
|
14,023,509 |
|
|
|
50.97 |
|
$60.01-$73.00
|
|
|
4,386,396 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
65.70 |
|
|
|
1,411,651 |
|
|
|
71.05 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,333,904 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
$ |
43.74 |
|
|
|
27,820,167 |
|
|
$ |
42.20 |
|
The per-share weighted average fair value of stock options
granted in 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $18.58, $12.00 and $14.47.
The fair value was estimated as of the grant date using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted
average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
|
3.0% |
|
|
|
4.0% |
|
Dividend yield
|
|
|
.70% |
|
|
|
.60% |
|
|
|
|
|
Volatility factor
|
|
|
34.4% |
|
|
|
37.0% |
|
|
|
38.9% |
|
Option life
|
|
|
3-7 years |
|
|
|
3-7 years |
|
|
|
3-7 years |
|
On December 31, 2004, the Company broadly granted
1.2 million immediately vested stock options as bonus
payments. In April 2004, Guidants Board of Directors
authorized the issuance of 610,000 restricted shares of common
stock (US) and restricted stock units (outside the US)
(collectively referred to as restricted stock
awards) to over 2,500 employees. In February 2003,
Guidants Board of Directors authorized the issuance of
approximately 2.3 million restricted stock awards.
Restricted stock awards are recorded at fair value at the date
of grant and are expensed ratably over the vesting period.
Restricted stock awards generally vest over three years. In
general, grants may vest earlier upon a qualifying disability,
death, retirement or change in control. The 2003 grant included
a performance element that allowed vesting to accelerate when
certain Guidant share price performance measures were met.
Specifically, one-third of the general grants vested upon
achievement of 25%, 50% and 75% appreciation of the 60-day
moving average stock price from the date of grant ($34.37 on
February 18, 2003). Portions of the executive officer
grants accelerated from six years to three years under this same
performance measure. Approximately two-thirds of the share price
appreciation targets were achieved and expensed in 2003. The
first performance measure was met in July 2003 and the second
measure was met in December 2003. The final share price
appreciation target was achieved in January 2004. The related
compensation expense associated with restricted stock totaled
$30.9 million and $53.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003.
45
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company introduced its Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP) in 2001. This plan allows employees to contribute up
to 10% of their wages toward the purchase of the Companys
common stock at the end of each four-month purchase period.
Employees purchase shares of Guidant common stock for 85% of the
average of the reported high and low sales prices on the first
or last day of the purchase period, whichever price is lower.
There were approximately 5.0 million additional shares
available for grant under the Companys stock plans,
including the ESPP, on December 31, 2004.
|
|
Note 6 |
Earnings Per Share |
The following table sets forth the computation of earnings per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
573.0 |
|
|
$ |
419.3 |
|
|
$ |
669.3 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(49.0 |
) |
|
|
(89.0 |
) |
|
|
(57.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
524.0 |
|
|
$ |
330.3 |
|
|
$ |
611.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.84 |
|
|
$ |
1.37 |
|
|
$ |
2.22 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.08 |
|
|
$ |
2.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
1.78 |
|
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
$ |
2.19 |
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
(0.19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
1.63 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
312.04 |
|
|
|
305.10 |
|
|
|
301.74 |
|
Effect of dilutive stock options and unvested restricted stock
awards
|
|
|
9.20 |
|
|
|
7.42 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding and assumed
conversions
|
|
|
321.24 |
|
|
|
312.52 |
|
|
|
305.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options outstanding at December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002 were 36.3 million, 44.8 million and
49.8 million. Earnings per share-diluted includes
34.1 million, 26.5 million and 19.2 million stock
options for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and
2002. Stock options whose exercise price per share was greater
than the average market value per share were excluded from the
calculation of earnings per share-diluted because including them
would have had an anti-dilutive impact.
46
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Companys outstanding borrowings on December 31
consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Long-term notes
|
|
$ |
352.0 |
|
|
$ |
355.7 |
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
301.9 |
|
|
|
584.9 |
|
Bank borrowings
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
659.2 |
|
|
|
948.3 |
|
Less short-term debt
|
|
|
302.0 |
|
|
|
250.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$ |
357.2 |
|
|
$ |
698.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On February 11, 1999, the Company issued seven-year, 6.15%
long-term notes with a $350.0 million principal amount due
in 2006. At December 31, 2004, Guidant had interest rate
swap agreements on these notes with a notional amount of
$350.0 million, converting the fixed interest rate to a
variable interest rate indexed to LIBOR. Interest rate
fluctuations impact the fair value of the interest rate swap
agreements, with an offsetting change to long-term notes. At
December 31, 2004, the interest rate swap had a fair value
of $2.7 million, which increases long-term debt.
At December 31, 2004, the Company had a $400.0 million
credit facility that permits borrowings through August 2007 and
a $500.0 million credit facility that permits borrowings
through August 2009. There are currently no outstanding
borrowings under these arrangements, which carry a variable
market rate of interest. Restrictive covenants in the borrowing
agreements include consolidations, mergers, certain sales of
assets, maintenance of certain financial performance measures
and limitations on subsidiary borrowings.
The weighted average interest rate on borrowings and interest
rate swap agreements outstanding at December 31, 2004 was
3.41% compared to 1.89% at December 31, 2003. The increase
in the weighted average interest rate was due to the increase in
floating interest rates in 2004 compared to 2003. Interest
expense, which approximates cash payments of interest on
borrowings, was $25.5 million, $17.2 million and
$21.4 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002.
|
|
Note 8 |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Currency translation adjustment
|
|
$ |
240.9 |
|
|
$ |
177.5 |
|
|
$ |
44.9 |
|
Unrealized loss on foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
(33.8 |
) |
|
|
(27.0 |
) |
|
|
(14.4 |
) |
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
(26.8 |
) |
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
(21.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
180.3 |
|
|
$ |
124.0 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Guidant leases various manufacturing and office facilities and
certain equipment under operating leases. Total future minimum
lease commitments are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
31.3 |
|
2006
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
2007
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
2008
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
2009
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
104.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense for all leases, including contingent rentals that
were not material, amounted to approximately $40.9 million,
$39.2 million and $32.3 million for 2004, 2003 and
2002.
Following is a summary of income before income taxes of US and
international operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
US
|
|
$ |
157.3 |
|
|
$ |
(174.8 |
) |
|
$ |
417.6 |
|
International
|
|
|
720.5 |
|
|
|
650.0 |
|
|
|
502.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
877.8 |
|
|
$ |
475.2 |
|
|
$ |
920.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is the composition of income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
138.8 |
|
|
$ |
(13.6 |
) |
|
$ |
208.5 |
|
|
State
|
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
70.9 |
|
|
|
110.1 |
|
|
|
76.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current expense
|
|
|
242.8 |
|
|
|
108.7 |
|
|
|
297.8 |
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
60.9 |
|
|
|
(25.9 |
) |
|
|
(25.2 |
) |
|
State
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
(22.1 |
) |
|
|
(19.4 |
) |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
62.0 |
|
|
|
(52.8 |
) |
|
|
(46.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$ |
304.8 |
|
|
$ |
55.9 |
|
|
$ |
251.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the future tax
consequences of events that have already been recognized in the
consolidated financial statements or income tax returns. At
December 31, deferred tax assets and liabilities consisted
of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory and product-related reserves
|
|
$ |
193.4 |
|
|
$ |
194.0 |
|
|
Net operating loss, capital loss and credit carryforwards
|
|
|
100.8 |
|
|
|
45.4 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
126.1 |
|
|
|
124.0 |
|
|
Acquisition of intangible assets
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
482.9 |
|
|
|
425.1 |
|
|
Valuation allowances
|
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
(12.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
468.9 |
|
|
|
412.5 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
(112.8 |
) |
|
|
(97.7 |
) |
|
Planned repatriation of foreign earnings under the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004
|
|
|
(104.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(217.6 |
) |
|
|
(98.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
$ |
251.3 |
|
|
$ |
314.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Following is a reconciliation of the effective income tax rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
US federal statutory income tax rate
|
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
Increase (decrease) in tax rate resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
Effect of international operations
|
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
Research credit
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
Benefit from export incentives
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
Nondeductible IPRD
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
Reduction of income tax accruals due to tax audit resolution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Planned repatriation of foreign earnings under the American Jobs
Creation Act of 2004
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective income tax rate
|
|
|
34.7 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
27.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004, approximately $63.8 million of
federal, $208.1 million of state and $12.6 million of
foreign tax losses and $49.9 million of federal and state
tax credits were available for carryforward. The federal, state
and foreign tax loss and credit carryforwards are subject to
valuation allowances and certain restrictions. The losses and
credits generally expire within a period of 3 to 20 years.
At December 31, 2004, $7.8 million of capital losses
were available for carryforward. The capital loss expires
December 31, 2005 and is subject to a valuation allowance.
In view of the consistent profitability of its past operations,
the Company believes that the deferred tax assets will be
substantially recovered and that no significant additional
valuation allowances are necessary.
49
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
On October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004
(the Act) was signed into law. The Act provides a one-time
elective incentive to repatriate foreign earnings by providing
an 85% dividends received deduction. Although significant
uncertainty remains regarding the interpretation and application
of the repatriation incentive, the Company has the necessary
information to make an informed decision regarding its
repatriation plans. Based on that decision, the Company plans to
repatriate approximately $1.5 billion in extraordinary
dividends as defined in the Act during 2005 and has recorded a
deferred tax liability of $104.2 million in the fourth
quarter of 2004 in connection with the planned repatriation, as
prior to that time, deferred income taxes had not been provided
for undistributed earnings because they were intended to be
indefinitely reinvested in operations outside the US. This
deferred tax liability includes a provision of
$29.4 million related to the gross-up on the portion of the
dividend subject to the 85% dividends received deduction (DRD).
As enacted, the Act does not expressly provide for the reduction
of the gross-up by the 85% DRD. In November 2004 technical
corrections legislation was introduced in both chambers of
Congress to permit reducing the gross-up by the 85% DRD. If the
legislation is enacted as introduced, the Company will reverse
the provision of $29.4 million in the quarter the
legislation is enacted.
US federal and state deferred income taxes have not been
recorded that would result from future remittances of other
undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
$1,985.1 million at December 31, 2004
because such earnings are intended to be indefinitely reinvested
in these foreign operations. Determination of the deferred tax
liability should the Company remit a portion of these earnings
is not feasible because such liability is dependent on the
circumstances if a future remittance would occur.
Income taxes paid were $51.9 million, $121.7 million
and $172.8 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002.
|
|
Note 11 |
Employee Benefit Plans |
Employee Savings and Stock Ownership Plan Guidant
has a defined contribution savings plan that covers its eligible
US employees. The plan includes both an employee savings
component (savings plan) and an employee stock ownership
component (Employee Stock Ownership Plan or ESOP).
The purpose of the plan is to provide additional financial
security to employees during retirement.
Participants in the plan may elect to contribute, on a
before-tax basis, a certain percent of their annual salaries.
Participants contributions may not be invested in Guidant
common stock. The Company matches a portion of these employee
contributions with Guidant common stock. In addition, the
Company contributes Guidant common stock to the ESOP in a fixed
percentage of employees annual base pay, regardless of the
employee contribution.
The Company makes its matching and fixed contributions to the
plans ESOP component. This internally leveraged ESOP
acquired approximately 9.0 million shares of newly issued
Guidant common stock at a cost of approximately
$60.0 million ($6.68 per share) in September 1995.
Common shares held by the ESOP are allocated among
participants accounts on a periodic basis until these
shares are exhausted (approximately 2007, assuming the year-end
price per share of Guidant common stock of $72.10 remains
constant). At December 31, 2004, the ESOP held
approximately 7.1 million shares allocated to employee
accounts and approximately 1.9 million unallocated shares.
The cost of shares held by the ESOP and not yet allocated to
employees is reported as a reduction of shareholders
equity. Allocated shares of the ESOP are charged to expense
based on the fair value of the shares transferred and are
treated as outstanding in the computation of earnings per share.
Compensation expense under these plans was $40.4 million,
$44.1 million and $33.6 million for 2004, 2003 and
2002.
Retirement Plans The Company sponsors the Guidant
Retirement Plan, a frozen noncontributory defined benefit plan.
The Companys funding policy for the Guidant Retirement
Plan is consistent with US employee benefit and tax-funding
regulations. The Company does not expect to make a contribution
to the Guidant Retirement Plan in 2005. Guidant Retirement Plan
assets, which are maintained in a trust, consist primarily of
50
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
equity and fixed income instruments. The Company also sponsors
the Guidant Excess Benefit Plan-Retirement, a nonqualified,
unfunded plan for certain of its officers and key employees, to
which the Company will make contributions equal to benefit
payments in 2005. In addition, US and Puerto Rico employees of
the Company are eligible to receive specified Company-paid
healthcare retirement benefits under a plan established in 2000.
The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for its
plans. Following is a summary of these plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guidant | |
|
Guidant | |
|
Healthcare | |
|
|
Retirement | |
|
Excess Benefit | |
|
Retirement | |
|
|
Plan | |
|
Plan-Retirement | |
|
Benefit Plan | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Accumulated Benefit Obligation at December 31
|
|
$ |
79.5 |
|
|
$ |
73.6 |
|
|
$ |
29.8 |
|
|
$ |
27.7 |
|
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
$ |
64.8 |
|
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$ |
81.6 |
|
|
$ |
74.7 |
|
|
$ |
30.5 |
|
|
$ |
29.1 |
|
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at fair value at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
63.7 |
|
|
$ |
55.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual gain on plan assets
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.3 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(1.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets at fair value at end of year
|
|
$ |
70.7 |
|
|
$ |
63.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status of the Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefits in excess of plan assets
|
|
$ |
(10.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(30.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(29.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(23.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(18.1 |
) |
|
Unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid (accrued) pension cost
|
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
23.1 |
|
|
$ |
(14.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(16.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Recognized in Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
$ |
(8.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(9.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(29.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(27.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(16.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.0 |
) |
|
Intangible asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax asset
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
$ |
23.7 |
|
|
$ |
23.1 |
|
|
$ |
(14.6 |
) |
|
$ |
(12.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(16.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Periodic Benefit Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
$ |
4.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
Special termination benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$ |
(0.7 |
) |
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The weighted average assumptions used to determine benefit
obligations at December 31 and net periodic benefit costs
for the years then ended are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guidant | |
|
|
|
|
Guidant | |
|
Excess Benefit | |
|
Healthcare | |
|
|
Retirement | |
|
Plan- | |
|
Retirement | |
|
|
Plan | |
|
Retirement | |
|
Benefit Plan | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Assumptions Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.00 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare cost trend rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.00 |
% (1) |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
Assumptions Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.90 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.90 |
% |
|
|
6.25 |
% |
|
|
6.90 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
8.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
5.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare cost trend rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
7.00 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
Healthcare costs trend rates are assumed to increase by an
annual rate of 10% in 2005, decreasing by 1% each year to 5% by
2010. |
The principal long-term determinant of a portfolios
investment return is its asset allocation. The Guidant
Retirement Plan allocation is heavily weighted towards growth
assets (90%) versus fixed income (10%). In addition, active
management strategies have added value relative to passive
benchmark returns. The expected long-term rate of return
assumption is based on the mix of assets in the plan, the
long-term earnings expected to be associated with each asset
class, and the additional return expected through active
management. This assumption is periodically benchmarked against
peer plans.
The amortization of prior service cost is determined using a
straight-line amortization of the cost over the average
remaining service period of employees expected to receive
benefits under the plans. The assumed healthcare cost trend rate
can have a significant effect on the amounts reported for
healthcare plans. A one-percentage point change in assumed
healthcare cost trend rates does not significantly impact the
service cost, interest cost or projected benefit obligation
disclosed for the Healthcare Retirement Benefit Plan.
The Guidant Retirement Plan weighted average asset allocations
at December 31, 2004 and 2003, by asset category, are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Equity and equity-like securities
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
77 |
% |
Debt securities
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Real Estate
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
2 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The allocation strategy for the Guidant Retirement Plan
comprises approximately 85% to 95% growth investments and 5% to
15% fixed-income investments. Within the growth investment
classification, the plan asset strategy encompasses equity and
equity-like instruments that are expected to represent
approximately 75% of the Companys plan asset portfolio of
both public and private market investments. The largest
component of these equity and equity-like instruments is
comprised of public equity securities that are well diversified
and invested globally in small-to-large companies. The remaining
portion of the growth investment
52
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
classification is represented by other alternative growth
investments. The alternative assets, comprised of real estate,
private market and hedge fund instruments provide an important
source of diversified, value-added return.
Certain employees outside the US participate in retirement plans
maintained by the Company. Expenses for the employees
participating in these plans have not been included in the
preceding table. Expenses attributable to the employees at these
locations are included in the results of operations and totaled
$10.7 million, $11.4 million and $6.5 million in
2004, 2003 and 2002.
|
|
Note 12 |
Segment Information |
The Company manages its business on the basis of one reportable
segment: the development, manufacture and marketing of
therapeutic medical technologies for the treatment of
cardiovascular and vascular diseases. Guidants chief
operating decision makers use consolidated results to make
operating and strategic decisions. See Item 1 for a brief
description of the Companys business.
Geographic Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net
Sales(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US
|
|
$ |
2,525.1 |
|
|
$ |
2,474.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,197.5 |
|
International
|
|
|
1,240.5 |
|
|
|
1,170.6 |
|
|
|
923.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,765.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,644.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,120.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Revenues are attributed to countries based on
location of the customer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Property and Equipment, Net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US
|
|
$ |
721.6 |
|
|
$ |
660.8 |
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
87.3 |
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
808.9 |
|
|
$ |
749.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Classes of Similar Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implantable defibrillator systems
|
|
$ |
1,763.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,488.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,006.8 |
|
Pacemaker systems
|
|
|
719.5 |
|
|
|
683.5 |
|
|
|
636.6 |
|
Coronary stent systems
|
|
|
538.1 |
|
|
|
843.7 |
|
|
|
920.9 |
|
Angioplasty systems
|
|
|
452.5 |
|
|
|
423.6 |
|
|
|
390.8 |
|
Cardiac surgery, biliary, peripheral and carotid systems
|
|
|
292.0 |
|
|
|
205.3 |
|
|
|
165.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,765.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,644.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,120.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No single customer represented more than 10% of the
Companys consolidated sales.
|
|
Note 13 |
Financial Instruments |
In the normal course of business, operations of the Company are
exposed to fluctuations in currency values and short-term
interest rates. The Companys objective is to reduce
earnings volatility associated with these
53
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
fluctuations to allow management to focus on core business
issues. Accordingly, the Company addresses these risks through a
controlled program of risk management that includes the use of
derivative financial instruments. The Companys derivative
activities are initiated within the guidelines of documented
corporate risk management policies. The Company does not enter
into any derivative transactions for speculative or trading
purposes.
Foreign Exchange Risk Management A portion of the
Companys cash flows is derived from transactions
denominated in foreign currencies (principally the currencies of
Europe and Asia). The US dollar value of transactions
denominated in foreign currencies fluctuates as the US dollar
strengthens or weakens relative to these foreign currencies. In
order to reduce the uncertainty of foreign exchange rate
movements on transactions denominated in foreign currencies, the
Company enters into derivative financial instruments in the form
of foreign exchange forward contracts with major financial
institutions. These forward contracts, which typically mature
within one year, are designed to hedge anticipated foreign
currency transactions, primarily cross-border sales of
inventory. These contracts also hedge intercompany loans,
payables and receivables. The Companys foreign exchange
contracts do not subject it to material risk due to exchange
rate movements, because gains and losses on these contracts
offset losses and gains on the assets, liabilities and
transactions being hedged.
No components of the contracts are excluded in the measurement
of hedge effectiveness. The critical terms of the foreign
exchange contracts are the same as the underlying forecasted
transactions; therefore, changes in the fair value of the
foreign exchange contracts should be highly effective in
offsetting changes in the expected cash flows from the
forecasted transactions. In 2004, expense of approximately
$5.0 million was recognized into earnings within cost of
products sold for forward exchange contracts on Japanese yen
determined to be ineffective. The hedges were deemed ineffective
due to sales in Japan being less than originally expected. No
gains or losses related to ineffectiveness of cash flow hedges
were recognized in earnings during 2003 and 2002. Unrealized
losses on foreign exchange contracts, net of taxes, of
($33.8) million, ($27.0) million and
($14.4) million were included as a component of accumulated
other comprehensive income in 2004, 2003 and 2002. The Company
anticipates that all gains and losses in accumulated other
comprehensive income related to foreign exchange contracts will
be reclassified into earnings by December 2006.
Interest Rate Risk Management The Company uses
interest rate swap agreements to manage its exposure to interest
rate movements and to reduce borrowing costs. The Companys
debt is composed of fixed-rate, long-term notes and
variable-rate, short-term bank borrowings. Guidant manages this
risk by using interest rate swap agreements to convert
fixed-rate debt to variable-rate debt. The Company had interest
rate swap agreements outstanding with a notional amount of
$350.0 million at December 31, 2004 and 2003.
Accordingly, interest rate fluctuations impact the fair value of
the interest rate swap agreements, with an offsetting change to
long-term notes. The fair value of the interest rate swap
agreements was recorded within Sundry and
Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the consolidated
balance sheets.
Concentrations of Credit Risk Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to credit risk
consist principally of interest-bearing investments, foreign
exchange contracts, trade receivables and interest rate swap
agreements. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents,
short-term investments, and certain other financial instruments
with various major financial institutions or in high-credit
quality commercial paper. The Company performs periodic
evaluations of the relative credit standing of these financial
institutions and companies and limits the amount of credit
exposure with any one institution. Cash and cash equivalents
include interest-bearing investments with maturities of three
months or less. These investments consist primarily of A-1 and
P-1 or better rated financial instruments and counterparties.
Hospitals and other healthcare providers account for a
substantial portion of the trade receivables. Collateral for
these receivables is generally not required. The risk associated
with this concentration is limited due to the large number of
accounts and their geographic dispersion. The Company monitors
the creditworthiness of customers to which it grants credit
terms in the normal course of business.
54
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of
nonperformance by counterparties to financial instruments, but
management believes this credit risk is limited by periodically
reviewing the creditworthiness of the counterparties to the
transactions.
Financial Instruments The fair value of cash and
cash equivalents, short-term investments, receivables and
short-term debt approximate their carrying value due to their
short-term maturities. The cost and estimated fair values of the
Companys other significant financial instruments are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Cost | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
Cost | |
|
Fair Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
Held-to-maturity securities
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
|
81.1 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term notes
|
|
$ |
352.0 |
|
|
$ |
360.1 |
|
|
$ |
355.7 |
|
|
$ |
374.2 |
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
The Company determines fair values primarily based on quoted
market values, when available. However, many of the
Companys investments have no quoted market prices and are
accounted for on the cost basis. To determine if these
investments are impaired, the Company evaluates whether an event
or change in circumstances has occurred that may have a
significant adverse effect on the original fair value (an
impairment indicator). The Company does not engage a
valuation firm to calculate fair value since these investments
are not considered material to the Companys financial
position. The fair value of long-term debt was based on the
current market rates for debt of similar maturity. The estimated
fair values of foreign exchange contracts and interest rate swap
agreements were calculated using pricing models used widely in
financial markets and included all foreign exchange contracts
regardless of hedge designation. The estimates presented on
long-term financial instruments are not necessarily indicative
of the amounts that would be realized in a current market
exchange.
|
|
Note 14 |
Discontinued Operations |
In March 2004, Guidants Board of Directors approved a plan
to discontinue the GALILEO Intravascular Radiotherapy System
(GALILEO System) product line for the treatment of in-stent
restenosis due to the significant competitive impact of drug
eluting stents. On April 21, 2004, Guidant signed a
definitive agreement with Novoste Corporation (Novoste) to
cooperate in assisting existing US and Canadian customers of the
GALILEO System who wish to transition to Novoste products.
Guidant received $2.5 million upon signing and will receive
earn-out payments up to a maximum of $4.0 million based on
Novoste sales in the US and Canada. The disposal plan consists
primarily of the termination of normal activity, abandonment of
property and equipment, product returns, collection of accounts
receivable and settlement of liabilities.
In December 2003, Guidants Board of Directors ratified a
plan to discontinue Guidants operations in Brazil due to
unfavorable business conditions and poor operating performance.
In June 2003, Guidants Board of Directors approved a plan
to dispose of the ANCURE ENDOGRAFT System (ANCURE) product
line to treat abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) due to
continuing financial losses, limited prospects for the
Companys AAA product line and the impact of the US
Department of Justice investigation. (See Note 16.)
55
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
In accordance with SFAS 144, Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, these disposals
represent discontinued operations. Accordingly, the accompanying
consolidated financial statements and notes reflect the results
of operations and financial position of the GALILEO and AAA
product lines and the Brazil operations as discontinued
operations for all periods presented.
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, there were $0.9 million
and $36.5 million in assets and $23.9 million and
$23.9 million in liabilities related to discontinued
operations. Assets are primarily comprised of accounts
receivable, inventory and property, plant and equipment.
Liabilities primarily include accruals for severance, product
returns, ANCURE-related settlements and lease commitments. Net
loss from discontinued operations includes charges related to
the impairment of certain long-lived assets, inventory
write-downs, customer returns, ANCURE-related settlements,
employee severance and facility costs. Loss from discontinued
operations before income taxes for the year ended
December 31, 2004 primarily includes charges of
$37.9 million for estimated ANCURE-related settlements,
write down of long-lived assets to fair value, severance related
charges and recording inventory and accounts receivable at net
realizable value. Loss from discontinued operations before
income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2003, includes
a $62.4 million charge for the agreement with the US
Department of Justice surrounding the ANCURE product line for
the treatment of AAA (See Note 16), a charge of
$37.9 million, primarily related to the write down of
long-lived assets to fair value, severance-related charges and
recording inventory and accounts receivable at net realizable
value and a gain of $20.0 million for a payment from Cook
in exchange for granting a covenant not to sue related to
Cooks manufacture and distribution of Cooks
endovascular graft products.
The following summarizes financial information for discontinued
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
72.2 |
|
|
$ |
118.7 |
|
Loss from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
118.0 |
|
|
|
81.3 |
|
Net loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
49.0 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
|
|
57.5 |
|
|
|
Note 15 |
Other Transactions |
Litigation Litigation settlements for 2004 totaled
$20.0 million and are described in Note 16. The
Company recorded a $422.8 million net litigation charge in
the second quarter of 2003. This charge was primarily due to an
arbitration panel finalizing a ruling on August 19, 2003,
that the Companys MULTI-LINK DUET Coronary Stent System
infringes certain claims under patents owned by Cordis. As a
result, the Company made a payment of $425.0 million to
Cordis in the fourth quarter of 2003. The Company accrued
$425.0 million in that quarter based on the decision of an
arbitration panel in a matter involving Cordis Corporation. That
decision became final in the third quarter of 2003, with payment
made in the fourth quarter of 2003. In 2002, the Company
recorded a $137.1 million net litigation benefit primarily
from a $158.2 million award plus interest and costs against
Medtronic.
Guidant Foundation In 2004, the Company
contributed $20.0 million to the Guidant Foundation. In
2002, the Company contributed $40.0 million. Guidant
Foundation is a non-profit organization that has common
management with Guidant. Guidant Foundation provides financial
support and grants to non-profit organizations for charitable
and educational programs that improve the quality of life for
people who are at risk for or suffer from cardiovascular
disease. Guidant Foundation also provides financial support to
non-profit organizations in the communities where Guidant
operates in the US. Contributions are made possible by the
profits of Guidant; however, Guidant is not required to make
contributions to the Guidant Foundation, except for amounts
pledged. Amounts payable to Guidant Foundation at
December 31, 2004 and 2003 were $36.0 million and
$31.0 million.
Restructuring On July 21, 2004,
Guidants Board of Directors approved a corporate-wide
restructuring and realignment that included work force
reductions, cessation of certain capital projects and contract
termina-
56
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
tions, resulting primarily from the weakness in the metallic
coronary stent market. The charge associated with this plan was
$66.0 million and includes severance and benefits packages
for affected employees of $42.7 million, expense associated
with the accelerated vesting of stock-based compensation (stock
options and restricted stock) for affected employees of
$7.1 million, impairment of property, plant and equipment
of $6.5 million, relocation expenses of $4.4 million,
contract termination costs of $3.9 million and other
related costs of $1.4 million. At December 31, 2004, a
liability of approximately $7.9 million remains related to
the 2004 restructuring. The liability primarily relates to
severance and benefit packages yet to be paid.
Guidants Board of Directors approved a plan to restructure
the biliary and peripheral product line operations in May 2002.
A charge of $14.0 million was recorded, which includes the
termination of Guidants involvement in certain peripheral
product clinical trials, work force reductions, facility
reductions and certain other related costs.
Cook Charge In July 2002, Guidant entered into an
agreement to acquire Cook Group Incorporated (Cook) in a
stock-for-stock transaction, subject to satisfaction of certain
clinical and legal conditions relating to the
ACHIEVEtm
Drug Eluting Coronary Stent System. The clinical conditions
included positive results from the US clinical study, DELIVER,
which compared the paclitaxel-coated ACHIEVE Drug Eluting
Coronary Stent System manufactured by Cook to Guidants
MULTI-LINK PENTA Coronary Stent System. On January 2, 2003,
the Company announced that a preliminary analysis of the
clinical results indicated that the primary target vessel
failure (TVF) endpoint of the study would not be met,
although there was a trend toward improvement in TVF in the
treatment arm of the study. Based on this information, the
conditions outlined in the merger agreement with Cook were not
expected to be satisfied and the merger agreement was
subsequently terminated in January 2003. A $60.6 million
charge was recorded in 2002 relating to a $50.0 million
termination fee plus accrued interest, $6.6 million
non-saleable, non-returnable Cook inventory and
$3.8 million of other merger-related expenses.
The Company is involved in patent, product liability,
shareholder and other legal proceedings that arise in the course
of the Companys business. The Company records a liability
when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be
reasonably estimated. If the reasonable estimate of a probable
loss is a range, and no amount within the range is a better
estimate, the lower end of the range is accrued. If a loss is
not probable or a probable loss cannot be reasonably estimated,
no liability is recorded.
Patent and other proprietary rights are essential to the
Companys business. Significant litigation concerning
patents and products is pervasive in the Companys
industry. Patent claims include challenges to the coverage and
validity of the Companys patents on products or processes
as well as allegations that the Companys products infringe
patents held by competitors or other third parties. Although the
Company believes that it has valid defenses to these challenges
with respect to material patents, there can be no assurance as
to the outcome of these matters, and a loss in any of these
cases could result in a loss of patent protection or the ability
to market products, which could lead to a significant loss of
sales, or otherwise materially affect future results of
operations.
Losses in the matters below generally are not considered
probable or cannot be reasonably estimated. Accordingly, the
Company has not recorded material reserves, individually or in
the aggregate, for these matters. While the liability of the
Company in connection with the claims cannot be estimated with
any certainty, the outcome of these legal proceedings is not
expected to have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, although the resolution in any
reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a
significant impact on the Companys results of operations
for that period. While the Company believes that it has valid
defenses in these matters, litigation is inherently uncertain,
excessive verdicts do occur, and the Company may in the future
incur material judgments or enter into material settlements of
claims. Product liability insurance remains available to the
Company on terms consistent with
57
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
those available in prior periods. However, like many of its
industry peers, the Company has elected to increase
substantially the degree to which it self-insures for product
liability exposures. The decision does not affect coverage with
respect to claims made under previous policies.
On February 18, 1998, Arterial Vascular Engineering, Inc.
(now known as Medtronic Vascular) filed suit against the
Companys subsidiary, Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.
(ACS), in the District Court for Delaware alleging that the sale
of its balloon-expandable coronary and peripheral stents
infringe the Boneau patents owned by Medtronic Vascular. The
suit is consolidated with a suit by ACS alleging infringement by
Medtronic Vascular of the Companys Lau stent patents. The
Medtronic Vascular complaint also alleges misappropriation of
trade secrets and breach of a confidentiality agreement by ACS.
In the lawsuit, Medtronic Vascular is seeking injunctive relief,
co-ownership of the Lau patents, monetary damages and a ruling
that the ACS stent patents asserted against Medtronic Vascular
are invalid. This suit is one of a number of suits brought by
Medtronic Vascular under the Boneau patents against most
substantial participants in the stent business. The allegations
made by Medtronic Vascular are wide-ranging and cover the
Companys stent products broadly. Accordingly, while
potential liability cannot be estimated with any certainty, an
adverse outcome could have a material impact on results of
operations or consolidated financial position. On
January 5, 2005, the court issued its opinion on claim
construction of both the Boneau and Lau patents and decided a
number of summary judgment motions filed by both parties. Among
these decisions, the court ruled: Guidants stents do not
infringe the Boneau patents; Medtronics state law claims
regarding alleged misappropriation of trade secrets were
time-barred due to the statute of limitations; and
Mr. Boneau was not an inventor of the Lau patents.
Medtronic has indicated that it will seek to appeal these
decisions. A trial in the first quarter of 2005 will address
whether Medtronic products infringe the Lau patents, and the
validity of the asserted claims of the Lau patents.
On June 15, 2000, Medtronic filed a declaratory judgment
action against the Company and its Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc.
(CPI) subsidiary in the District Court for Minnesota
requesting that the court rule that Medtronic does not infringe
certain of CPIs patents for atrial fibrillation technology
or that the patents are not valid. Subsequently, the Company
asserted additional patents related to atrial fibrillation
technology against Medtronic in the same court. On
November 29, 2004, the parties resolved this dispute to
their mutual satisfaction. As part of the settlement, Medtronic
made a one-time payment to the Company of $20.0 million.
On March 6, 2002, Pacesetter, Inc. (Pacesetter), a
subsidiary of St. Jude, filed suit against the Companys
subsidiaries, CPI and Guidant Sales Corporation (GSC), in the
Central District of California alleging that CPI and GSC have
infringed a number of Pacesetter patents covering various
features of pacemakers and implantable defibrillators. On the
Companys motions, the case was transferred to the District
Court for Minnesota and stayed in October 2003 pending
reexamination of two of the patents. The parties stipulated to
lift the stay in October 2004. Currently four patents are at
issue. Pacesetter is seeking injunctive relief, monetary damages
and attorney fees. Pretrial matters are scheduled into late 2006.
On April 14, 2003, Medinol Ltd. (Medinol) filed suit
against the Company and its ACS subsidiary in the Southern
District of New York alleging that the sale of the
Companys MULTI-LINK ZETA, MULTI-LINK PENTA and MULTI-LINK
VISION Coronary Stent Systems infringe five Medinol patents
related to stent design. The complaint seeks injunctive relief
and monetary damages. Pretrial matters are scheduled through
2005.
On June 12, 2003, the Company announced that its
subsidiary, EndoVascular Technologies, Inc., had entered into a
plea agreement with the US Department of Justice relating to a
previously disclosed investigation regarding the ANCURE
ENDOGRAFT System for the treatment of abdominal aortic
aneurysms. At the time of the EVT plea, the Company had
outstanding fourteen suits alleging product liability related
causes of action relating to the ANCURE System. Subsequent to
the EVT plea, the Company has been notified of additional claims
and served with additional complaints. From time to time, the
Company has settled certain of the claims and suits for amounts
that were not material to the Company. Currently, the Company has
58
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
outstanding approximately forty suits, and more suits are likely
to be filed. The cases generally allege the plaintiff suffered
injuries, and in certain cases died, as a result of purported
defects in the device or the accompanying warnings and labeling.
The complaints seek damages, including punitive damages, and
equitable relief. While insurance may reduce the Companys
exposure with respect to ANCURE claims, one of the
Companys carriers, Allianz Insurance Company (Allianz),
filed suit in the Circuit Court, State of Illinois, County of
DuPage, seeking to rescind or otherwise deny coverage, and
additional carriers have intervened in the case. The Company
also has initiated suit against certain of its carriers,
including Allianz, in the Superior Court, State of Indiana,
County of Marion, in order to preserve the Companys rights
to coverage.
Also following the EVT plea, the Company was served with
securities class action and shareholder derivative complaints
relating to the ANCURE System. A consolidated securities class
action, naming as defendants the Company, EVT and certain of
their current and former officers, was filed in the Southern
District of Indiana. Generally, it alleged that during all or a
portion of the period from June 23, 1999, through
June 12, 2003, public statements by the Company relating to
the ANCURE System were false and misleading. Damages were sought
on behalf of persons who purchased or otherwise acquired Company
shares during that period. On November 8, 2004, the court
dismissed the plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiffs filed an
amended complaint on December 23, 2004, which defendants
again moved to dismiss. On February 11, 2005, the court
approved the parties stipulation to dismissal of the case
with prejudice and without payment by the Company.
The derivative suits relating to the ANCURE System currently are
pending in the Southern District of Indiana and in the Superior
Court of the State of Indiana, County of Marion. The suits,
purportedly filed on behalf of the Company, generally allege
that the Companys directors breached their fiduciary
duties by taking improper steps or failing to take steps to
prevent the ANCURE and EVT related matters described above. The
complaints seek damages and other equitable relief. The state
court suits have been stayed in favor of the federal action. The
Company has filed a motion to dismiss the federal action, which
motion is fully briefed. In connection with the briefing, the
court certified an issue to the Indiana Supreme Court relating
to the plaintiffs obligation to make a demand on the
Companys Board of Directors before filing a lawsuit. The
parties are awaiting a ruling on the certified issue.
On August 29, 2003, Medtronic filed a declaratory judgment
action in the District Court for Delaware against the Company,
GSC, Eli Lilly and Company, and Mirowski Family Ventures L.L.C.
(Mirowski), challenging its obligation to pay royalties to
Mirowski on certain devices by alleging the invalidity of
certain claims of US patent RE 38,119 (119), which patent
relates to cardiac resynchronization therapy and bi-ventricular
pacing therapy. The 119 patent is exclusively licensed to
the Company as part of a broader license covering Mirowski
patents and is sublicensed to Medtronic. The parties agreed to
an expedited proceeding with limited scope and a bench trial was
held in November, 2004.
On February 2, 2004, the Company, GSC, CPI and Mirowski
filed a declaratory judgment action in the District Court for
Delaware against St. Jude and Pacesetter alleging that their
Epic HF, Atlas HF and Frontier 3x2 devices infringe the
119 patent, described in the prior paragraph. Pretrial
matters are scheduled into 2006.
On February 24, 2004, the Companys subsidiary, CPI,
filed a patent infringement action in the District Court of
Minnesota against St. Jude and Pacesetter. In the Companys
complaint, as amended, CPI and GSC allege that St. Judes
Quicksite over-the-wire pacing lead infringes US Patent
No. 5,755,766/ Reexamination Certificate No. 5,755,766
C1. Pretrial matters are scheduled into 2006.
On February 24, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement
with J&J to co-promote the CYPHER Sirolimus-eluting Coronary
Stent in the US. Previously, Boston Scientific sued J&J in
the US District Court for the District of Delaware alleging that
the CYPHER stent infringes certain patents owned or licensed by
59
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Boston Scientific. On March 16, 2004, Boston Scientific
filed an amended complaint adding the Company as a defendant.
Under the terms of the agreement with J&J, J&J is
required to indemnify the Company.
Anna Mirowski, Lilly and two Company subsidiaries, GSC and CPI,
are plaintiffs in a patent infringement suit originally filed
against St. Jude and its affiliates in November 1996 in the
District Court in Indianapolis. In July 2001, a jury found that
US Patent No. 4,407,288 (288 Patent), which was
licensed to CPI and expired in December 2003, was valid and
infringed by St. Judes defibrillator products. In February
2002, the District Court reversed the jurys findings. In
August 2004, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, among other
things, reinstated the jury verdict of validity, and remanded
the matter for a new trial on infringement and damages. St.
Judes request for additional Federal Circuit review was
denied, and the case has been sent back to the District Court
for further proceedings.
On December 8, 2004, Scimed Life Systems, Inc. (Scimed), a
subsidiary of Boston Scientific, filed suit against the Company
and the Companys subsidiaries, ACS and GSC, in the
District of Minnesota alleging that ACS and GSC have infringed
three of Scimeds patents covering various features of
embolic protection systems. Scimed is seeking injunctive relief,
monetary damages and attorney fees.
60
GUIDANT CORPORATION
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 17 Selected Quarterly Information
(Unaudited)
The following table summarizes the Companys operating
results by quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Fourth | |
|
Third | |
|
Second | |
|
First | |
|
Fourth | |
|
Third | |
|
Second | |
|
First | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Net sales
|
|
$ |
968.2 |
|
|
$ |
924.5 |
|
|
$ |
938.8 |
|
|
$ |
934.1 |
|
|
$ |
940.2 |
|
|
$ |
920.1 |
|
|
$ |
926.6 |
|
|
$ |
857.9 |
|
Cost of products sold
|
|
|
232.0 |
|
|
|
228.7 |
|
|
|
234.6 |
|
|
|
226.3 |
|
|
|
231.4 |
|
|
|
216.4 |
|
|
|
224.5 |
|
|
|
205.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
736.2 |
|
|
|
695.8 |
|
|
|
704.2 |
|
|
|
707.8 |
|
|
|
708.8 |
|
|
|
703.7 |
|
|
|
702.1 |
|
|
|
652.8 |
|
Research and development
|
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
124.4 |
|
|
|
136.8 |
|
|
|
137.6 |
|
|
|
132.1 |
|
|
|
140.7 |
|
|
|
129.4 |
|
|
|
112.8 |
|
Purchased in-process research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73.0 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
36.5 |
|
Sales, marketing and administrative
|
|
|
296.1 |
|
|
|
282.1 |
|
|
|
298.1 |
|
|
|
314.7 |
|
|
|
322.7 |
|
|
|
300.1 |
|
|
|
297.2 |
|
|
|
269.0 |
|
Interest, net
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Royalties, net
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
13.3 |
|
Amortization
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
Litigation, net
|
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
422.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Foundation contribution
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
299.9 |
|
|
|
200.2 |
|
|
|
169.9 |
|
|
|
207.8 |
|
|
|
229.2 |
|
|
|
208.1 |
|
|
|
(176.2 |
) |
|
|
214.1 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
176.2 |
|
|
|
39.5 |
|
|
|
34.3 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
29.7 |
|
|
|
62.9 |
|
|
|
(94.4 |
) |
|
|
57.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
123.7 |
|
|
|
160.7 |
|
|
|
135.6 |
|
|
|
153.0 |
|
|
|
199.5 |
|
|
|
145.2 |
|
|
|
(81.8 |
) |
|
|
156.4 |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(19.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
(13.6 |
) |
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
(16.1 |
) |
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
(63.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
104.5 |
|
|
$ |
153.6 |
|
|
$ |
126.5 |
|
|
$ |
139.4 |
|
|
$ |
204.9 |
|
|
$ |
129.1 |
|
|
$ |
(97.1 |
) |
|
$ |
93.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.67 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.63 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
$ |
(0.27 |
) |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
(0.03 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
0.32 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
(0.32 |
) |
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
316.06 |
|
|
|
312.70 |
|
|
|
310.91 |
|
|
|
308.48 |
|
|
|
306.07 |
|
|
|
306.64 |
|
|
|
304.52 |
|
|
|
303.20 |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
325.56 |
|
|
|
320.68 |
|
|
|
320.15 |
|
|
|
318.56 |
|
|
|
315.33 |
|
|
|
314.96 |
|
|
|
304.52 |
|
|
|
308.03 |
|
Common stock prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
$ |
74.20 |
|
|
$ |
66.87 |
|
|
$ |
69.50 |
|
|
$ |
73.70 |
|
|
$ |
60.53 |
|
|
$ |
52.04 |
|
|
$ |
45.75 |
|
|
$ |
37.95 |
|
|
Low
|
|
$ |
62.05 |
|
|
$ |
49.95 |
|
|
$ |
51.50 |
|
|
$ |
59.39 |
|
|
$ |
44.95 |
|
|
$ |
43.00 |
|
|
$ |
34.59 |
|
|
$ |
28.89 |
|
All financial information reflects the AAA and GALILEO product
lines and Brazil Operations as discontinued operations.
61
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Guidant Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Guidant Corporation as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and
the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2004. Our audits
also included the financial statement schedule listed in the
Index at Item 15 (a)(2). These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Guidant Corporation at December 31,
2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of Guidant Corporations internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of
the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 8,
2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/S/ Ernst & Young LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 8, 2005
62
|
|
ITEM 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements
with Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure |
None.
|
|
ITEM 9A. |
Controls and
Procedures |
An evaluation was carried out, under the supervision of and with
the participation of Guidants management, including the
chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer
(CFO), of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by
this report. Based on the evaluation, the CEO and CFO have
concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures are effective.
There was no change in the Companys internal control over
financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
Managements Report on Financial Statements
The management of Guidant Corporation is responsible for the
integrity and objectivity of the accompanying financial
statements and related information. The consolidated financial
statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the US and include amounts
based on judgments and estimates by management.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an
adequate system of internal control over financial reporting of
the Company. This system of internal accounting controls is
designed to provide reasonable assurance that assets are
safeguarded and transactions are properly recorded and executed
in accordance with managements authorization. The design,
monitoring and revision of the system of internal accounting
controls involves, among other things, managements
judgments with respect to the relative cost and expected
benefits of specific control measures. The effectiveness of the
control system is supported by the selection, retention and
training of qualified personnel and an organizational structure
that provides an appropriate division of responsibility and
formalized procedures. The system of internal accounting
controls is periodically reviewed and modified in response to
changing conditions. An internal audit staff regularly monitors,
on a worldwide basis, the adequacy and effectiveness of internal
accounting controls.
In addition to the system of internal accounting controls,
management maintains corporate policy guidelines that help
monitor proper overall business conduct, possible conflicts of
interest, compliance with laws and confidentiality of
proprietary information. The guidelines are documented in the
Guidant Code of Business Conduct and are reviewed on a periodic
basis with members of management worldwide.
Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal
control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable
assurance and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further,
because of changes in conditions, effectiveness of internal
controls over financial reporting may vary over time. Our system
contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to
correct deficiencies as they are identified.
Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
system of internal control over financial reporting based on the
framework in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this
evaluation, management concluded that the Companys system
of internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2004. Managements assessment of the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting has been audited by Ernst & Young
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated
in their report in which they expressed an unqualified opinion,
which is included herein.
63
Audit Committee Oversight
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, consisting solely
of outside directors, appoints the independent auditors and
receives and reviews the reports submitted by them. The Audit
Committee meets several times during the year with management,
the internal auditors and the independent auditors to discuss
audit activities, internal controls and financial reporting
matters. The internal auditors and the independent auditors have
full and free access to the Audit Committee.
64
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Guidant Corporation
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting, that Guidant Corporation maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(the COSO criteria). Guidant Corporations management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an
opinion on the effectiveness of the companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Guidant
Corporation maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our
opinion, Guidant Corporation maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2004, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Guidant Corporation as of
December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated
statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2004 of Guidant Corporation and our report
dated February 8, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
/S/ Ernst & Young LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
February 8, 2005
65
|
|
ITEM 9B |
Other Information |
None.
PART III
|
|
ITEM 10. |
Directors and Executive
Officers of the Registrant |
The Companys annual meeting of shareholders for 2005 has
been postponed due to the pending merger with Johnson &
Johnson. If the merger remains unconsummated into late 2005, an
annual shareholders meeting will be scheduled at a later date.
Directors
The following individuals serve as members of the Companys
Board of Directors. Except as otherwise indicated, primary
affiliations for the past five years are as listed below.
|
|
|
James M. Cornelius
Age: 61
Director from 1994
|
|
Non-executive chairman of the Companys board
Other boards: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Chubb Corporation,
Given Imaging Ltd., The DIRECTV Group, Inc. and The National
Bank of Indianapolis Corporation |
|
Maurice A. Cox, Jr.
Age: 54
Director from 1995
|
|
Retired president and chief executive officer of The Ohio
Partners, LLC
(venture capital) |
|
Nancy-Ann Min DeParle
Age: 48
Director from 2001
|
|
Senior advisor, J.P. Morgan Partners, LLC and adjunct professor,
The
Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania; previously
administrator of the Health Care Financing Administration (now
the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) (1997-2000)
Other boards: Accredo Health Incorporated, Cerner Corporation,
DaVita, Inc. and Triad Hospitals, Inc. |
|
Ronald W. Dollens
Age: 58
Director from 1994
|
|
President and chief executive officer of the Company
Other boards: Beckman Coulter Corporation and Kinetic Concepts,
Inc. |
|
Enrique C. Falla
Age: 65
Director from 1995
|
|
President of Falla, Smith & Associates, Inc. (business and
financial consulting); previously senior consultant, executive
vice president, and chief financial officer of Dow Chemical
Company (1991-2000) |
|
Michael Grobstein
Age: 61
Director form 1999
|
|
Retired vice chairman of Ernst & Young LLP and vice chairman
of Ernst & Young International
Other board: Given Imaging Ltd. |
|
Kristina M. Johnson
Age: 47
Director from 2004
|
|
Dean of the Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University
Other boards: The AES Corporation, Minerals Technology
Corporation and Dycom Industries, Inc. |
|
J.B. King
Age: 75
Director from 1994
|
|
Counsel to the law firm of Baker & Daniels (which provides
legal services to the Company representing less than one percent
of the revenues of Baker & Daniels); previously, vice
president and general counsel of the Company (through 2000) |
66
|
|
|
|
J. Kevin Moore
Age: 50
Director from 1995
|
|
Vice president and managing partner of Arbor Group, LLC
(healthcare consulting); previously senior vice president for
strategic planning for Advanced Medical Productions (through
2003) and senior vice president and chief operating officer of
the Carolinas Medical Center (through 2000) |
|
|
Mark Novitch, MD
Age: 72
Director from 1995
|
|
Retired vice chairman of the board and chief compliance officer
of The Upjohn Company (pharmaceuticals)
Other boards: Alteon, Inc., Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and
Neurogen Corporation |
|
|
Jack A. Shaw
Age: 66
Director from 2004
|
|
Retired president, chief executive officer and a director of
Hughes Electronics Corporation (digital television entertainment
and broadband satellite)
Other boards: Globecomm Systems, Inc. and XM Satellite Radio,
Inc. |
|
Eugene L. Step
Age: 76
Director from 1995
|
|
Retired executive vice president and president of the
pharmaceutical division of Eli Lilly and Company and member of
its executive committee and board of directors
Other boards: Cell Genesys, Inc. and Ceregene, Inc. |
|
Ruedi E. Wäger, PhD
Age: 61
Director from 1995
|
|
Retired president and chief executive officer of Aventis Behring
LLC (blood plasma and therapeutic proteins) and member of its
board of directors
Other boards: Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
|
August M. Watanabe, MD
Age: 63
Director from 2001
|
|
Retired executive vice president, science and technology, of Eli
Lilly and Company and member of its executive committee and
board of directors |
Guidants business is managed under the boards
direction. Under the boards corporate governance
guidelines, the independent directors annually elect a
non-executive chairman to lead the board. A portion of each
board meeting is held in executive session, with the chairman
presiding.
You can contact the full board, its non-executive chairman, or
the independent directors as a group or any of the directors by
writing to Guidant Corporation, Secretary, PO Box 44906,
Indianapolis, IN 46244. All communications will be compiled by
the secretary and submitted to the addressees on a periodic
basis.
Guidants board is predominantly independent.
Guidants board annually evaluates the independence of its
members. A director will not qualify as independent unless the
board affirmatively determines that the director has no material
relationship with the Company. In making its determination, the
board considers business, charitable and other relationships
(including, without limitation, each of the matters identified
under Transactions with Directors and Executive
Officers) under the standards provided in the boards
Corporate Governance Guidelines. The guidelines reflect the
requirements of the NYSE and the Companys Code of Business
Conduct.
As a Fortune 500 company, Guidant has relationships with
many leading business and professional entities. Qualified
candidates for the board (or their immediate family members) are
often associated in some way with these leading entities. The
board uses the standards mentioned above to evaluate the
significance of any relationships. Applying the NYSE rules, for
example, the board will not find a director to be independent if
the director or an immediate family member of the director in
the prior three years was an executive officer of Guidant, was
affiliated with Ernst & Young LLP, or had other
relationships with Guidant as specified in applicable NYSE
listing standards. On the other hand, a directors
independence generally will not be viewed as impaired by
relationships permissible under the NYSE guidelines, such as
payments to a company where the director is employed that do not
exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of that
companys consolidated gross revenues.
Under these standards, the board concluded that a majority of
the board is independent. All board members other than
Messrs. Dollens and King were found to be independent. Each
member of the Audit, Management Development and Compensation and
Corporate Governance Committees is an independent director under
applicable NYSE listing standards.
67
Guidants board has determined that at least one member of
the Audit Committee, the committee chair, Mr. Grobstein, is
an audit committee financial expert, as that term is
defined under Section 407 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and the rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) in furtherance of Section 407. As
described above, Mr. Grobstein is an independent director.
The remaining members of the Audit Committee are
Messrs. Cox, Falla and Moore.
There have been no material changes to the procedures by which
security holders may recommend nominees to the Companys
Board of Directors subsequent to the disclosure of such
procedures incorporated in the Companys previous annual
report.
Executive Officers
The following executive officers serve at the pleasure of the
board. Service dates include service with Eli Lilly and Company.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Age | |
|
Title/Service |
|
|
| |
|
|
Ronald W. Dollens
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer (1994)
Company service from 1972 |
Guido J. Neels
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer (2004)
Company service from 1982 |
Mark C. Bartell
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
President, Sales Operations (2000)
Company service from 1985 |
Keith E. Brauer
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (1994)
Company service from 1974 |
Maria Degois-Sainz
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
President, Cardiac Surgery (2003)
Company service from 1989 |
Bernard E. Kury
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
Vice President and General Counsel (2004)
Company service from 2004; previously a partner with Dewey
Ballantine from 1971 |
Ronald K. Lattanze
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
President, Endovascular Solutions (2005)
Company service from 1996 |
Beverly H. Lorell, MD
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Vice President, Chief Medical and Technology Officer (2004)
Company service from 2004; also serves as professor of medicine
at Harvard Medical from 1999 |
Roger Marchetti
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
Vice President, Human Resources (2002)
Company service from 1988 |
Peter J. Mariani
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
Vice President, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting
Officer (2002)
Company service from 1994 |
William F. McConnell, Jr.
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Information Officer (1998)
Company service from 1998 |
R. Frederick McCoy, Jr.
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
President, Cardiac Rhythm Management (2000)
Company service from 1981 |
Dana G. Mead, Jr.
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
President, Vascular Intervention (2003)
Company service from 1992 |
Ronald N. Spaulding
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
President, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Canada (2002)
Company service from 1994 |
68
|
|
ITEM 11. |
Executive
Compensation |
Director Compensation
Directors who are not employees of Guidant receive compensation
for board service. The arrangements include an annual cash
retainer of $36,000 and an option to
purchase 10,000 shares for all members except the
non-executive chairman, who receives $400,000 and an option to
purchase 24,000 shares. Mr. King also received in
2004 an additional grant of options on 7,500 shares for
service on the Companys international advisory boards. For
any meetings held outside of the six regularly scheduled board
meetings, directors also receive $3,000 for each in-person board
or committee meeting, $1,000 if telephonic. Committee chairs
receive $10,000 annually, except for the chairs of the Audit
Committee and the Compliance Committee, who receive $15,000. The
Company also provides a maximum of $5,000 annually provided as a
match to a directors contributions to qualified
educational institutions.
The options granted as part of the annual retainer have an
exercise price set at the fair market value on the date of the
grant, have a ten-year term and typically vest approximately one
year from the grant date. The annual grants are made pursuant to
the 1996 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan.
Executive Compensation
The following tables provide compensation information for
Guidants chief executive officer, each of the four next
most highly compensated executive officers and Mr. A. Jay
Graf, who ceased to serve as an executive officer during 2004
(the named executive officers).
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Compensation | |
|
Long-Term Compensation(1) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted | |
|
Underlying | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Annual | |
|
Stock | |
|
Options | |
|
All Other | |
Name and Principal Position |
|
Year | |
|
Salary | |
|
Bonus(2) | |
|
Compensation(3) | |
|
Awards(4) | |
|
Granted(5) | |
|
Compensation(6) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ronald W. Dollens
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
$ |
735,012 |
|
|
$ |
0 |
|
|
$ |
20,511 |
|
|
$ |
801,497 |
|
|
|
109,350 |
|
|
$ |
81,545 |
|
|
President and Chief |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
700,008 |
|
|
|
437,500 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
2,500,560 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
84,252 |
|
|
Executive Officer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
618,000 |
|
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
19,399 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
77,279 |
|
A. Jay Graf
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
448,584 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
334,483 |
|
|
|
45,650 |
|
|
|
45,374 |
|
|
Former Group Chairman, |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
427,212 |
|
|
|
187,500 |
|
|
|
11,712 |
|
|
|
1,232,915 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
45,321 |
|
|
Office of the President |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
406,860 |
|
|
|
437,500 |
|
|
|
16,259 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
41,641 |
|
Guido J. Neels
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
507,748 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
41,662 |
|
|
|
1,585,243 |
|
|
|
45,650 |
|
|
|
123,596 |
|
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
427,212 |
|
|
|
187,500 |
|
|
|
226,016 |
|
|
|
1,232,915 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
114,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
325,717 |
|
|
|
262,500 |
|
|
|
27,130 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Keith E. Brauer
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
372,329 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
21,777 |
|
|
|
1,236,403 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
33,571 |
|
|
Vice President, Finance and |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
340,680 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
916,872 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
30,838 |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
324,456 |
|
|
|
262,500 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
33,263 |
|
R. Frederick McCoy, Jr.
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
335,973 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
10,913 |
|
|
|
1,486,555 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
28,076 |
|
|
President, Cardiac Rhythm |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
281,196 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
9,254 |
|
|
|
916,872 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
23,810 |
|
|
Management |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
267,804 |
|
|
|
262,500 |
|
|
|
11,847 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
22,192 |
|
Dana G. Mead, Jr.
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
335,973 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
22,792 |
|
|
|
1,486,555 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
22,949 |
|
|
President, |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
|
271,221 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
536,787 |
|
|
|
916,872 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
22,311 |
|
|
Vascular Intervention |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
240,588 |
|
|
|
218,750 |
|
|
|
585,986 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
17,529 |
|
|
|
(1) |
No long-term incentive plan payouts were made and no stock
appreciation rights were granted. |
|
(2) |
Represents amounts awarded in cash as annual bonus. |
|
(3) |
For Mr. Neels in 2003 and Mr. Mead in 2002 and 2003,
consists primarily of relocation allowances and related tax
equalization. |
|
(4) |
The number of restricted shares held by the named executive
officers at December 31, 2004, and the value of the shares
on that date (based upon a closing stock price of
$72.10 per share) were as follows: Mr. Dollens,
84,700 shares, $6,106,870; Mr. Graf,
40,800 shares, $2,941,680; Mr. Neels,
61,800 shares, |
69
|
|
|
$4,455,780; Mr. Brauer, 46,700 shares, $3,367,070;
Mr. McCoy, 50,900 shares, $3,669,890; and
Mr. Mead, 50,900 shares, $3,669,890. Dividends are
paid on restricted shares. Restricted shares generally vest at
least three years from the date of grant; however, a
May 17, 2004 grant of 12,600 shares to Mr. Brauer
is subject to two-year cliff vesting, and restricted shares are
subject to earlier vesting upon a change in control, death,
disability or retirement. For purposes of accelerated vesting of
equity as described in these compensation tables, a change
in control includes approval of a transaction by the
shareholders of the Company, such as the pending merger with
J&J, that would result in the Companys existing
shareholders holding less than 50% of the voting shares of the
surviving entity. |
|
|
(5) |
Options to acquire Guidant common shares. |
|
(6) |
Contributions by Guidant to the executives account in the
ESSOP and Excess Savings Plan and above-market interest earned
on any portion of the annual bonus deferred at an officers
election. Mr. Neels receives a supplemental payment under
the Excess Savings Plan to offset the effects of changes in his
pension benefits flowing from his relocation from Belgium. |
Option Shares Granted in 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Grants(1) | |
| |
|
|
Number of | |
|
% of Total | |
|
|
|
|
Securities | |
|
Options | |
|
|
|
|
Underlying | |
|
Granted to | |
|
Exercise Price | |
|
|
|
Grant Date | |
|
|
Options | |
|
Employees | |
|
per | |
|
|
|
Present | |
Name |
|
Granted | |
|
in Year | |
|
Share(2) | |
|
Expiration Date | |
|
Values(3) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ronald W. Dollens
|
|
|
109,350 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
$ |
63.11 |
|
|
|
4/1/14 |
|
|
$ |
2,065,621 |
|
A. Jay Graf
|
|
|
45,650 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
$ |
63.11 |
|
|
|
4/1/14 |
|
|
|
862,329 |
|
Guido J. Neels
|
|
|
45,650 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
% |
|
$ |
63.11 |
|
|
|
4/1/14 |
|
|
|
862,329 |
|
Keith E. Brauer
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
$ |
63.11 |
|
|
|
4/1/14 |
|
|
|
415,580 |
|
R. Frederick McCoy, Jr.
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
$ |
63.11 |
|
|
|
4/1/14 |
|
|
|
415,580 |
|
Dana G. Mead, Jr.
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
% |
|
$ |
63.11 |
|
|
|
4/1/14 |
|
|
|
415,580 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Stock appreciation rights were not granted during 2004. |
|
(2) |
Represents the fair market value of Guidants shares on the
date of grant. One-third of the grant will become exercisable on
each of April 1, 2005, 2006 and 2007, or earlier upon a
change in control, death, disability or retirement. |
|
(3) |
Per SEC regulations, these values were established using the
Black-Scholes stock option valuation model. The value ultimately
realized, if any, will depend on the amount by which the market
price of the stock exceeds the exercise price on the date of
exercise. |
|
|
Assumptions used to calculate the Grant Date Present Value of
these option shares include: |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Expected Volatility The average variance in the
percent change in monthly closing stock price of 36.70% from
April 1999 to March 2004. |
|
|
(b) |
Risk Free Rate of Return The assumed rate for a US
Treasury obligation having a term of 5 years during the
month of grant based on the actual US Treasury rates as
published in the Federal Reserve Statistical Release,
which was 3.39%. |
|
|
(c) |
Time of Exercise The expected average actual option
term, which was 5 years. |
|
|
(d) |
Turnover The expected turnover rate for executives
who receive stock options, which is 10%. |
|
|
(e) |
Dividend Yield The expected dividend yield was 0.72%. |
70
Aggregated Option Shares Exercised in 2004 and
2004 Year-End Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
Number of | |
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised | |
|
Value of Unexercised In-the- | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
|
|
Options at Year End | |
|
Money Options at Year End(1) | |
|
|
Acquired on | |
|
Value | |
|
| |
|
| |
Name |
|
Exercise | |
|
Realized | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Unexercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Ronald W. Dollens
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,747,653 |
|
|
|
2,133,404 |
|
|
|
109,350 |
|
|
$ |
85,565,602 |
|
|
$ |
983,057 |
|
A. Jay Graf
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
7,527,750 |
|
|
|
776,000 |
|
|
|
45,650 |
|
|
|
24,776,490 |
|
|
|
410,394 |
|
Guido J. Neels
|
|
|
80,956 |
|
|
|
3,764,049 |
|
|
|
498,000 |
|
|
|
45,650 |
|
|
|
17,063,245 |
|
|
|
410,394 |
|
Keith E. Brauer
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
9,191,600 |
|
|
|
691,000 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
21,999,390 |
|
|
|
197,780 |
|
R. Frederick McCoy, Jr.
|
|
|
108,000 |
|
|
|
3,405,780 |
|
|
|
510,000 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
14,359,300 |
|
|
|
197,780 |
|
Dana G. Mead, Jr.
|
|
|
163,000 |
|
|
|
3,954,790 |
|
|
|
241,000 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
7,541,820 |
|
|
|
197,780 |
|
|
|
(1) |
No stock appreciation rights were outstanding during 2004.
Represents the amount by which the market price of
Guidants shares exceeded the exercise prices of
unexercised options on December 31, 2004. |
Retirement Plans
Pension Plan Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Earnings |
|
|
|
Estimated Annual | |
(Highest 5 of Last 10 Years) |
|
|
|
Benefit(1) | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
$ |
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
167,173 |
|
|
|
|
525,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
238,324 |
|
|
|
|
675,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
309,475 |
|
|
|
|
825,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
380,625 |
|
|
|
|
975,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
451,776 |
|
|
|
|
1,125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
522,927 |
|
|
|
|
1,275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
594,078 |
|
|
|
|
1,425,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
665,228 |
|
|
|
|
1,575,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
736,379 |
|
|
|
|
1,725,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
807,530 |
|
|
|
|
1,875,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
878,681 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Assuming the named executive officer is age 65 upon
retirement, the estimated annual benefit will not vary with
years of service. |
Certain executive officers of Guidant participate in one or both
of two defined benefit pension plans that Guidant established:
the Guidant Retirement Plan (the Retirement Plan) and the
Guidant Excess Benefit PlanRetirement (the Excess Plan).
The Retirement Plan is a tax-qualified plan that determines
benefits under a formula that takes into account a
participants years of service and average annual earnings
through the date of Guidants split-off from Lilly in
September 1995. The Excess Plan is a non-qualified plan that
supplements the Retirement Plan to provide a total pension
benefit based on the Lilly Retirement Plan benefit formula (but
without proration for years of service less than 35) and the
participants total years of service and average annual
earnings with Guidant and Lilly. (This benefit is determined
without regard to certain limitations applicable to
tax-qualified benefits under the Internal Revenue Code.) Pension
benefits earned under this formula are illustrated in the above
Pension Plan Table. The enhanced benefit provided by the Excess
Plan is offset by (a) any benefits payable to the
participant under the Retirement Plan and the Lilly pension
plans and (b) the portion of the participants
benefits under The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock Ownership
Plan (ESSOP) and The Guidant Excess Benefit
Plan Savings (Excess Savings Plan) attributable to
Guidants Retirement ESOP contributions.
71
The named executive officers other than Mr. Neels and
Mr. Mead are entitled to receive retirement benefits under
the Retirement Plan. Mr. McCoy has frozen benefits under
the Retirement Plan based on his earnings and years of service
with Guidant and Lilly prior to September 25, 1995. His
expected annual benefits, expressed as a life annuity beginning
at age 65, are $34,100.
Messrs. Dollens, Graf and Brauer are entitled to receive
retirement benefits under both the Retirement Plan and the
Excess Plan. The Pension Plan Table sets forth a range of annual
retirement benefits for graduated levels of average annual
earnings (consisting of Salary and Bonus as set forth in the
Summary Compensation Table) assuming retirement at age 65
with a 50% survivor income benefit. (The Excess Plan provides
Messrs. Dollens, Graf, and Brauer with a subsidized 100%
survivor annuity.) As noted above, however, the amounts payable
to the retired employee under the Excess Plan are reduced for
benefits attributable to Guidant Retirement ESOP contributions
to the ESSOP and the Excess Savings Plan and amounts payable
under the Retirement Plan and Lilly pension plans. The amounts
shown in the table are not subject to reduction for Social
Security benefits.
Prior to becoming Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Neels served
Guidant as president, Europe, Middle East, Africa and Canada. He
did not participate in the domestic ESSOP; rather, he was
covered by a pension program in Belgium. That program has been
frozen, with contributions totaling approximately $176,000. The
benefit (which will include interest at a Belgian statutory
rate) is payable in a lump sum at age 65.
Change-In-Control Severance Pay Plan
Each of Guidants executive officers is a participant in
Guidants Change In Control Severance Pay Plan for Select
Employees, referred to in this filing as the change in control
plan.
Under the change in control plan, upon a change in
control of Guidant, an executive officer is entitled to
severance payments and other benefits if the executive
officers employment is terminated within two years
following a change in control by the Company without
cause or by the employee for good reason
(each as defined in the change in control plan), or if the
executive officers employment is terminated by the
executive officer for any reason within the thirty-day period
beginning on the one-year anniversary of a change in control
(other than a change in control resulting from Guidants
entering into a definitive agreement or Guidants board
adopting a resolution relating to a change in control, each as
further described below). Within fifteen days of the eligible
termination, Guidant must pay the executive officer a single
lump-sum cash payment equal to three times the sum of the
executive officers annual base salary at the time of
termination (or, if greater, at the time of the change in
control) and the greater of the executive officers target
incentive bonus for the year of the termination or the incentive
bonus earned for the year immediately prior to the change in
control.
Under the change in control plan, a change in
control of Guidant is defined to occur upon a number of
actions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition by any person, directly or indirectly, of 20% or
more of Guidants voting shares, |
|
|
|
shareholder approval of certain business transactions, including
transactions such as the merger with J&J, |
|
|
|
Guidants entering into a definitive agreement which, if
consummated, would result in a change in control, and |
|
|
|
the Guidant Board of Directors adopting a resolution to the
effect that a change in control has occurred. |
Guidants entering into the merger agreement with J&J
constituted a change in control under the change in control
plan. Receipt of shareholder approval of the merger as well as
the completion of the merger will each constitute a change in
control for purposes of establishing the thirty-day period
during which an executive officer may terminate his or her
employment for any reason and be entitled to severance payments
as described above.
72
If an executive officers employment terminates and he or
she is entitled to receive severance payments under the change
in control plan, the executive officer would also receive
continued welfare benefits at the Companys sole expense
for three years following the date of termination at the level
for which the executive officer was eligible at the time of the
termination of employment or immediately prior to the change in
control, whichever provides coverage more favorable to the
executive officer, three years of additional age and service
credit for pension purposes and the crediting of severance
benefits as pensionable earnings pro-rata over the three-year
severance period to the extent not already vested and
exercisable, immediate acceleration of any stock options or
other stock-based awards (to the extent not already accelerated
under the terms of the Companys equity plans in connection
with shareholder approval of the merger), payment of any accrued
bonus (or, if greater, the pro-rata target bonus for the year of
the termination) and any deferred compensation (unless the
obligation to pay such amounts is subject to payment under a
grantor (i.e., rabbi) trust), outplacement services,
and a gross-up for any golden parachute excise tax
that may be payable by the executive under Section 4999 of
the Internal Revenue Code, and any income and employment
withholding taxes on the gross-up payment, with respect to the
severance payments and other benefits due to the executive
officer (whether under the change in control plan or otherwise).
Messrs. Dollens and Graf have indicated that they will
decline the benefits that they otherwise may have received under
the change in control plan.
In connection with the execution of the merger agreement,
J&J and Guidant entered into letter agreements with
Messrs. McCoy and Mead and four additional executive
officers that modify each such executive officers rights
and obligations under the change in control plan. The letter
agreements modify the change in control plan definitions as
follows: (i) the definition of change in
control is amended to exclude from the definition the
execution of a definitive agreement which, if consummated, would
result in a change in control, and to exclude from the
definition the adoption by Guidants Board of Directors of
a resolution to the effect that a change in control has
occurred, and the definition is further modified to provide that
a change in control will occur upon consummation of certain
business transactions, including transactions such as the
merger, rather than upon shareholder approval of such
transactions; (ii) the definition of covered
termination is modified to eliminate the executive
officers ability to receive change in control plan
benefits upon a voluntary termination of employment for any
reason (i.e., without good reason) during the
thirty-day period beginning on the first anniversary of the
merger; (iii) the definition of good reason is
modified generally to limit the circumstances that will
constitute good reason for termination of employment; and
(iv) the definition of cause is modified
generally to expand the circumstances that constitute cause for
termination of employment.
Under the terms of each of the letter agreements, if the
executive officer remains in continuous employment with the
Company through the expiration of the two-year period
immediately following consummation of the merger (for purposes
of this paragraph, the second anniversary), he will
receive a bonus in an amount equal to fifty percent of the cash
severance payment that otherwise would have been payable in
accordance with the terms of the change in control plan had a
covered termination of employment occurred immediately following
consummation of the merger (for purposes of this paragraph, the
first retention bonus). If the executive officer
remains in continuous employment with the Company following the
second anniversary through the expiration of the three-year
period immediately following consummation of the merger (for
purposes of this paragraph, the third anniversary),
he will receive an additional bonus in an amount equal to the
first retention bonus (for purposes of this paragraph, the
second retention bonus). In addition, if during the
period commencing immediately following the second anniversary
and ending on the third anniversary, the executive officer is
involuntarily terminated by Guidant other than for cause (as
such term is defined in the change in control plan, as modified
by the letter agreement), the executive officer will be entitled
to receive the second retention bonus following termination,
plus the non-cash benefits that would have been otherwise
payable pursuant to the change in control plan had such
termination occurred during the two-year period immediately
following consummation of the merger. Payment of the first and
second retention bonuses is contingent upon execution of a
general waiver and release of claims.
The letter agreements do not alter the provisions of the change
in control plan that provide benefits upon a covered termination
of employment (subject to the modifications of certain
definitions under the change in
73
control plan as described above) before the second anniversary
of the merger. The letter agreements also provide that, if
payment of the first or second retention bonus results in the
imposition of an excise tax under Section 4999 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the provisions of the
change in control plan providing for additional payments in
respect of such taxes will apply.
Pursuant to the letter agreements, Guidant also agrees prior to
completion of the merger not to terminate the executive officers
other than for cause (as such term is defined in the change in
control plan, as modified by the letter agreements), except if
such termination is effectuated prior to consummation of the
merger in connection with a specified divestiture of assets. In
addition, individuals who are parties to the letter agreements
are not permitted to terminate their employment for good reason
(as such term is defined in the change in control plan, as
modified by the letter agreements) during the period prior to
consummation of the merger.
Indemnification and Insurance
The Companys merger agreement with J&J provides that
all rights to indemnification and exculpation from liabilities
for acts or omissions occurring at or prior to the effective
time of the merger existing in favor of current or former
directors or officers of Guidant under the Guidant articles of
incorporation or bylaws will be assumed by the surviving
corporation in the merger and will continue in full force and
effect in accordance with their terms following completion of
the merger.
The merger agreement also provides that for six years after the
effective time of the merger, J&J will maintain
directors and officers liability insurance for acts
or omissions occurring at or prior to the effective time of the
merger, covering each person who was, as of the date of the
merger agreement, covered by Guidants directors and
officers liability insurance, on terms no less favorable
than those in effect as of the date of the merger agreement.
Transactions with Directors and Executive Officers
In November 2003, Guidant entered into an agreement to invest up
to $500,000 in a technology accelerator company that is
affiliated with Duke University, all of which has been invested
to date. Dr. Johnson was a founder of the company and had
served as the chair of the board of directors. Upon the closing
of the investment round in which the company participated,
Dr. Johnson resigned from the board and divested her equity
interests without compensation pursuant to Duke University
policy; however, she continues to serve as an ex officio member
of the companys board of directors.
In 2004, the son of director J.B. King became employed with the
Company as a field clinical representative. Compensation for
that portion of 2004 was approximately $60,000.
74
|
|
ITEM 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain
Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder
Matters |
Directors and Executive Officers Ownership of
Guidant Common Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Owned Beneficially(1) | |
|
|
| |
Keith E. Brauer
|
|
|
840,171 |
|
James M. Cornelius
|
|
|
1,557,000 |
|
Maurice A. Cox, Jr.
|
|
|
66,020 |
|
Nancy-Ann Min DeParle
|
|
|
20,500 |
|
Ronald W. Dollens
|
|
|
2,574,046 |
|
Enrique C. Falla
|
|
|
58,769 |
|
A. Jay Graf
|
|
|
1,005,084 |
|
Michael Grobstein
|
|
|
47,970 |
|
Kristina M. Johnson, Ph.D.
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
J.B. King
|
|
|
864,809 |
|
R. Frederick McCoy, Jr.
|
|
|
633,408 |
|
Dana G. Mead, Jr.
|
|
|
314,259 |
|
J. Kevin Moore
|
|
|
37,425 |
|
Guido J. Neels
|
|
|
712,941 |
|
Mark Novitch, M.D.
|
|
|
66,801 |
|
Jack A. Shaw
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
Eugene L. Step
|
|
|
74,426 |
|
Ruedi E. Wäger, Ph.D.
|
|
|
44,105 |
|
August M. Watanabe, M.D.
|
|
|
32,197 |
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (28 people)
|
|
|
10,226,095 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Beneficial ownership is as of February 1, 2005. Each person
listed owned less than 1% of the outstanding common shares of
Guidant. All directors and executive officers as a group owned
3%. Unless otherwise indicated below, each person listed in the
table possessed sole voting and investment power with respect to
the shares. The shares shown include: |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
the following shares that may be purchased pursuant to stock
options that are exercisable within 60 days of
February 1, 2005: Mr. Brauer, 598,333;
Mr. Cornelius, 1,082,000; Mr. Cox, 52,500;
Ms. DeParle, 17,500; Mr. Dollens, 2,169,854;
Mr. Falla, 46,500; Mr. Graf, 821,650;
Mr. Grobstein, 44,500; Ms. Johnson, 1,250;
Mr. King, 742,944; Mr. McCoy, 517,333; Mr. Mead,
248,333; Mr. Moore, 25,500; Mr. Neels, 513,216;
Dr. Novitch, 52,500; Mr. Shaw, 1,250; Mr. Step,
62,500; Dr. Wäger, 18,000; Dr. Watanabe, 30,500;
and all directors and executive officers as a group, 8,031,105. |
|
|
(b) |
the following shares (as to which the holders possess voting but
not investment power) credited to the accounts of named
executive officers under The Guidant Employee Savings and Stock
Ownership Plan (the ESSOP) as of December 31, 2004:
Mr. Brauer, 49,939; Mr. Dollens, 53,789;
Mr. Graf, 41,102; Mr. McCoy, 26,855; Mr. Mead,
3,922; Mr. Neels, 679; and all executive officers as a
group, 213,781. |
|
|
(c) |
the following restricted shares (as to which the holders possess
voting but not investment power): Mr. Brauer,
46,700 shares; Mr. Dollens, 84,700; Mr. McCoy,
50,900; Mr. Mead, 50,900; Mr. Neels, 61,800; and all
executive officers as a group, 506,967. |
75
|
|
|
|
(d) |
the following shares, as to which beneficial ownership is shared
and/or disclaimed: Mr. Cornelius, 32,408 shares owned
by the Cornelius Family Foundation, Inc. and Mr. Dollens,
50,000 shares owned by the Dollens Family Foundation, Inc. |
Principal Holders of Guidant Common Stock
To Guidants knowledge, based upon the named
shareholders filings with the SEC on Schedule 13G,
the following were the only beneficial owners of 5% or more of
the outstanding common shares of Guidant as of December 31,
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and Address |
|
Number of Shares | |
|
Percent | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Capital Research and Management
Company(1)
335 Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071 |
|
|
19,419,100 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
% |
PRIMECAP Management
Company(2)
225 South Lake Avenue #400
Pasadena, CA 91101 |
|
|
19,013,404 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
(1) |
According to Capital Researchs Schedule 13G filing
with the SEC dated February 9, 2005, it has (a) sole
voting power with respect to no shares and sole power to cause
disposition of 19,419,100 shares and (b) shared voting and
dispositive power with respect to no shares. |
|
(2) |
According to PRIMECAPs Schedule 13G dated
January 7, 2005, it has (a) sole power to cause the
disposition of all such shares and sole voting power with
respect to 17,094,512 shares and (b) shared voting and
dispositive power with respect to no shares. |
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires executive
officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more
than 10% of the Companys common stock, to file initial
reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with
the SEC and NYSE. Executive officers, directors and beneficial
owners with more than 10% of the Companys common stock are
required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies
of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on the
Companys review of copies of such reports and written
representations from the Companys executive officers and
directors, the Company believes that its executive officers and
directors complied with Section 16(a) filing requirements
during 2004.
Code of Business Conduct
Guidant has adopted a Code of Business Conduct applicable to
directors and employees and certain additional parties related
to Guidant, including Guidants principal executive
officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting
officer and controller, and other employees performing similar
functions. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct is available
at www.guidant.com.
Guidant intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under
Item 10 of Form 8-K regarding an amendment to, or
waiver from, a provision of the Code of Business Conduct by
posting such information on Guidants website at the
address specified above.
76
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following provides information as of December 31, 2004
with respect to Company equity compensation plans
the 1994 Stock Plan, 1998 Stock Plan, 1996 Nonemployee Director
Stock Plan and 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities | |
|
|
|
|
Weighted-Average | |
|
Remaining Available for | |
|
|
Number of Securities to | |
|
Exercise Price of | |
|
Future Issuance under | |
|
|
be Issued upon Exercise of | |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Equity Compensation | |
|
|
Outstanding Options, | |
|
Options, | |
|
Plans (Excluding | |
|
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Warrants and Rights | |
|
Securities in Column (a)) | |
Plan Category |
|
(a) | |
|
(b) | |
|
(c)* | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
36,334,000 |
|
|
$ |
43.74 |
|
|
|
4,962,000 |
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
* |
The shares available for future issuance as of December 31,
2004 included the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
3,265,000 shares available for purchase by employees under
the 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (established pursuant to
Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended), which are not available for grant in any other
form; and |
|
|
|
1,697,000 shares available for issuance in the form of
restricted stock grants under the 1994 Stock Plan, 1998 Stock
Plan and 1996 Nonemployee Director Stock Plan and
1,500,000 shares available for issuance as performance
share awards under the 1998 Stock Plan; provided that if such
awards are granted, they will reduce the number of shares
available for issuance pursuant to future stock option awards. |
ITEM 13. Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions
See information under Item 10, Transactions with
Directors and Executive Officers.
ITEM 14. Principal
Accountant Fees and Services
Ernst & Young Fees
Guidants independent auditor fee pre-approval policy
provides for an annual process through which the Audit Committee
evaluates the nature and scope of the audit prior to the
commencement of the audit. At the same time, the committee
evaluates audit-related, tax and other services that are
proposed, along with the anticipated cost of such services. The
committee reviews schedules of specific services to be provided.
If other services are desired outside of this annual process,
under the policy they may be pre-approved by the committee at a
regularly scheduled meeting or by the chair, acting between
meetings and reporting back to the committee at the next
scheduled meeting.
It has been Guidants practice for many years to require
Audit Committee pre-approval of services by the independent
auditors. All services for 2004 were pre-approved pursuant to
the Companys pre-approval policies.
77
For 2004 and 2003, fees for services provided by
Ernst & Young were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal 2004 | |
|
Fiscal 2003 | |
Description of Fees |
|
Amount | |
|
Amount | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Audit
Fees(1)
|
|
$ |
2,178,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,584,000 |
|
Audit-Related
Fees(2)
|
|
|
122,000 |
|
|
|
291,000 |
|
Tax
Fees(3)
|
|
|
1,799,000 |
|
|
|
1,918,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
4,099,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,793,000 |
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes fees for the annual audit, reviews of quarterly
financial statements and internal control attestation. |
|
(2) |
Includes fees for due diligence, employee benefit plan audits
and accounting consultations. |
|
(3) |
Includes: |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
Tax compliance fees of $892,000 (2004) and $1,100,000
(2003), primarily for international and expatriate tax
compliance and preparation and review of various tax
returns; and |
|
|
(b) |
Other tax of $907,000 (2004) and $818,000 (2003), primarily
related to international tax consulting and other international
tax work. |
PART IV
ITEM 15. Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements of Guidant Corporation are
filed as part of this report under Item 8.
(a)(2) Financial Statement
Schedules
The following consolidated financial statement schedule is
required to be filed by Item 8 of this form:
|
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts |
All other schedules for which provision is made in the
applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required
under the related instructions, are inapplicable, or are
adequately explained in the consolidated financial statements
and, therefore, have been omitted.
(a)(3) Exhibits
The Exhibit Index is included herein.
78
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on February 14, 2005, on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Ronald W. Dollens |
|
|
|
|
|
Ronald W. Dollens, President,
Chief Executive Officer and a Director |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed on February 14, 2005, by
the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the
capacities indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald W. Dollens
Ronald
W. Dollens |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director (principal
executive officer) |
|
/s/ Keith E. Brauer
Keith
E. Brauer |
|
Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer (principal
financial officer) |
|
/s/ Peter J. Mariani
Peter
J. Mariani |
|
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (principal
accounting officer) |
|
/s/ James M. Cornelius
James
M. Cornelius |
|
Chairman of the Board and a Director |
|
/s/ Maurice A. Cox, Jr.
Maurice
A. Cox, Jr. |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Nancy-Ann Min DeParle
Nancy-Ann
Min DeParle |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Enrique C. Falla
Enrique
C. Falla |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Michael Grobstein
Michael
Grobstein |
|
Director |
|
/s/ J.B. King
J.B.
King |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Kristina M. Johnson, Ph.D.
Kristina
M. Johnson, Ph.D. |
|
Director |
|
/s/ J. Kevin Moore
J.
Kevin Moore |
|
Director |
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark Novitch, M.D.
Mark
Novitch, M.D. |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Jack A. Shaw
Jack
A. Shaw |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Eugene L. Step
Eugene
L. Step |
|
Director |
|
/s/ Ruedi E. Wäger, Ph.D.
Ruedi
E. Wäger, Ph.D. |
|
Director |
|
/s/ August M. Watanabe, M.D.
August
M. Watanabe, M.D. |
|
Director |
80
SCHEDULE II. VALUATION AND
QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Col. A |
|
Col. B | |
|
Col. C | |
|
Col. D | |
|
Col. E | |
|
|
Balance at | |
|
Charged to | |
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
|
Beginning | |
|
Costs and | |
|
|
|
End of | |
Description |
|
of Period | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Deductions(1) | |
|
Period | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Year Ended December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for inventory obsolescence
|
|
$ |
37.4 |
|
|
$ |
57.0 |
|
|
$ |
(38.4 |
) |
|
$ |
56.0 |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$ |
62.9 |
|
|
$ |
64.7 |
|
|
$ |
(42.1 |
) |
|
$ |
85.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for inventory obsolescence
|
|
$ |
56.0 |
|
|
$ |
54.1 |
|
|
$ |
(65.6 |
) |
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$ |
85.5 |
|
|
$ |
57.9 |
|
|
$ |
(74.9 |
) |
|
$ |
68.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for inventory obsolescence
|
|
$ |
44.5 |
|
|
$ |
20.0 |
|
|
$ |
(32.0 |
) |
|
$ |
32.5 |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$ |
68.5 |
|
|
$ |
21.7 |
|
|
$ |
(35.7 |
) |
|
$ |
54.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information above excludes discontinued operations: GALILEO and
AAA product lines and Brazil operations.
|
|
(1) |
Write-off of obsolete units or uncollectible accounts, impact of
changes in exchange rates and other adjustments. |
81
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of December 15, 2004
among Johnson & Johnson, Shelby Merger Sub, Inc. and
the Company(1) |
|
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Amended Articles of Incorporation* |
|
|
3 |
.2 |
|
By-Laws of the Registrant(2) |
|
|
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Specimen of Certificate for Common Stock(3) |
|
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Form of Indenture between the Company and Citibank, N.A., as
Trustee(4) |
|
|
4 |
.3 |
|
Form of Supplemental Indenture between the Company and Citibank,
N.A., as Trustee(4) |
|
|
4 |
.4 |
|
Rights Agreement dated as of December 15, 2004 between the
Company and EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.(1) |
|
|
10 |
.1 |
|
Settlement and License Agreement dated as of December 17,
1991 among Schneider (Europe) A.G., Schneider (USA) Inc. and
Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (ACS)(3) |
|
|
10 |
.2 |
|
Amendment to Settlement and License Agreement dated as of
April 9, 1992 among Schneider (Europe) A.G., Schneider
(USA) Inc. and ACS(3) |
|
|
10 |
.3 |
|
Amended License Agreement dated as of September 26, 1988
between Paul Yock, M.D. and ACS(3) |
|
|
10 |
.4 |
|
First Amendment to Amended License Agreement dated as of
January 1, 1992 between Paul Yock, M.D. and ACS(3) |
|
|
10 |
.5 |
|
Second Amendment to Amended License Agreement dated as of
January 13, 1992 between Paul Yock, M.D. and ACS(3) |
|
|
10 |
.6 |
|
Amended and Restated Exclusive License Agreement by and between
Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC and the Company dated
January 28, 2004* |
|
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Master License Agreement dated April 3, 2000 by and among
Cordis Corporation, the Company, and their respective
affiliates, portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a
request for confidential treatment(5) |
|
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Agreements through and including Settlement and Release
Agreement and Amendment to Master License Agreement dated
February 24, 2004 by and between the Company,
Johnson & Johnson and their respective affiliates,
portions of which have been omitted pursuant to a request for
confidential treatment(6) |
|
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Guidant Corporation 1994 Stock Plan, as amended(7)# |
|
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Guidant Corporation 1996 Nonemployee Director Stock Plan, as
amended(8)# |
|
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Guidant Corporation 1998 Stock Plan, as amended(8)# |
|
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Form of Company Option Grant*# |
|
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Form of Company Restricted Stock Grant*# |
|
|
10 |
.14 |
|
2001 Guidant Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan(9)# |
|
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Guidant Corporation Economic Value Added (EVA) and
Milestone Bonus Plan, as amended(10)# |
|
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Guidant Corporation Change in Control Plan for Select
Employees(11)# |
|
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Form of Amendment to Change in Control Plan for Select
Employees(1)# |
|
|
10 |
.18 |
|
Guidant Corporation Excess Benefit Plan Savings
(Restated January 1, 2002)(8)# |
|
|
10 |
.19 |
|
Guidant Corporation Excess Benefit
Plan Retirement(12)# |
|
|
10 |
.20 |
|
The Guidant Executive Deferred Bonus Plan, as amended(10)# |
|
|
11 |
|
|
Statement regarding computation of per-share earnings(13) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges* |
|
|
21 |
|
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant* |
|
|
23 |
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm* |
|
|
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of Ronald W. Dollens* |
|
|
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of Keith E. Brauer* |
|
|
32 |
.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of Ronald W. Dollens* |
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
.2 |
|
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of Keith E. Brauer* |
|
|
99 |
|
|
Factors Possibly Affecting Future Operating Results* |
|
|
(1) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys filing on
Form 8-K dated as of December 15, 2004. |
|
(2) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys filing on
Form 8-K dated as of December 16, 2002. |
|
(3) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-83934. |
|
(4) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-3, File No. 333-00014. |
|
(5) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2000. |
|
(6) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004. |
|
(7) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1996. |
|
(8) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. |
|
(9) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys 2001 Proxy
Statement. |
|
|
(10) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. |
|
(11) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 1995. |
|
(12) |
Incorporated by reference to the Companys 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2000. |
|
(13) |
Incorporated by reference to Item 8 under Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 6
Earnings Per Share. |
83