UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 000-18805
ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC.
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
94-3086355 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
303 Velocity Way, Foster City, CA 94404
(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(650) 357 - 3500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No o
The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of October 31, 2004 was 53,783,315.
ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC.
INDEX
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Electronics for Imaging, Inc.
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 152,644 | $ | 113,163 | ||||
Short-term investments |
496,642 | 510,949 | ||||||
Restricted cash and short-term investments |
| 69,669 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
55,492 | 53,317 | ||||||
Inventories |
5,151 | 7,989 | ||||||
Other current assets |
29,006 | 28,718 | ||||||
Total current assets |
738,935 | 783,805 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
44,237 | 49,094 | ||||||
Restricted investments |
88,580 | 43,080 | ||||||
Goodwill |
76,559 | 67,166 | ||||||
Intangible assets, net |
43,680 | 51,032 | ||||||
Other assets |
31,165 | 19,484 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,023,156 | $ | 1,013,661 | ||||
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 27,709 | $ | 17,995 | ||||
Accrued and other liabilities |
63,663 | 67,386 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
27,196 | 33,231 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
118,568 | 118,612 | ||||||
Long-term obligations |
240,224 | 240,236 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
358,792 | 358,848 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 5,000 shares authorized; none issued
and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 150,000 shares authorized; 53,754 and
54,396 shares issued and outstanding, respectively |
637 | 620 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
357,938 | 328,358 | ||||||
Deferred compensation |
(1,197 | ) | (1,597 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 9,964 and 7,648 shares, respectively |
(214,722 | ) | (159,077 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income |
(995 | ) | 1,012 | |||||
Retained earnings |
522,703 | 485,497 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
664,364 | 654,813 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,023,156 | $ | 1,013,661 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Electronics for Imaging, Inc.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 97,586 | $ | 97,330 | $ | 313,375 | $ | 271,734 | ||||||||
Cost of revenue |
33,989 | 37,652 | 110,166 | 109,139 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
63,597 | 59,678 | 203,209 | 162,595 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
28,448 | 23,725 | 83,269 | 69,807 | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
17,999 | 14,746 | 57,017 | 44,659 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
7,208 | 5,518 | 20,619 | 15,510 | ||||||||||||
Real estate related charges |
14,394 | | 14,394 | | ||||||||||||
Amortization of identified
intangibles and other
acquisition-related expense |
3,520 | 1,330 | 11,515 | 5,208 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
71,569 | 45,319 | 186,814 | 135,184 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) Income from operations |
(7,972 | ) | 14,359 | 16,395 | 27,411 | |||||||||||
Interest and other income, net: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
3,486 | 3,104 | 9,302 | 8,725 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(1,770 | ) | (1,250 | ) | (4,366 | ) | (1,631 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on equity investment |
| (731 | ) | | (891 | ) | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
| | 2,994 | | ||||||||||||
Litigation settlement income |
| 1,568 | 58 | 1,568 | ||||||||||||
Total interest and other income, net |
1,716 | 2,691 | 7,988 | 7,771 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) Income before income taxes |
(6,256 | ) | 17,050 | 24,383 | 35,182 | |||||||||||
Benefit (Provision) for income taxes |
22,315 | (4,801 | ) | 12,823 | (9,740 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,059 | $ | 12,249 | $ | 37,206 | $ | 25,442 | ||||||||
Net income per basic common share |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Shares used in per-share calculation |
53,746 | 52,467 | 53,934 | 53,734 | ||||||||||||
Net income per diluted common share |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Shares used in per-share calculation |
54,314 | 53,594 | 55,268 | 54,569 | ||||||||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Electronics for Imaging, Inc.
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||
(In thousands) |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 37,206 | $ | 25,442 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
17,958 | 11,911 | ||||||
In-process research and development expense |
1,000 | 1,220 | ||||||
Change in allowance for bad debt and sales-related allowances |
(1,423 | ) | (170 | ) | ||||
Deferred income taxes |
(12,674 | ) | (3,157 | ) | ||||
Deferred compensation |
399 | | ||||||
Loss on equity investment |
| 891 | ||||||
Gain on sale of Unimobile assets |
(2,994 | ) | | |||||
Loss on write-off of costs associated with synthetic lease |
852 | | ||||||
Loss on retirement of real estate-related assets |
2,192 | | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(1,348 | ) | 681 | |||||
Inventories |
2,832 | 37 | ||||||
Other current assets |
900 | (9,408 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
4,258 | 656 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
(2,536 | ) | 3,195 | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
46,622 | 31,298 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Sales/maturities (purchases) of short-term investments, net |
11,607 | (136,654 | ) | |||||
Sales/maturities (purchases) of restricted cash and investments, net |
24,050 | (167 | ) | |||||
Reclassification of cash & short-term investments to restricted
securities |
| (69,320 | ) | |||||
Investment in property and equipment, net |
(4,395 | ) | (3,889 | ) | ||||
Business acquired, net of cash received |
(11,550 | ) | (8,936 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from sale of Unimobile assets |
4,134 | | ||||||
Other assets |
(917 | ) | 189 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities |
22,929 | (218,777 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Repayment of long-term obligation |
(12 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net |
| 233,500 | ||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
25,702 | 31,071 | ||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(55,645 | ) | ||||||
(58,191 | ) | |||||||
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities |
(29,955 | ) | 206,351 | |||||
Effect of foreign exchange changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(115 | ) | 35 | |||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
39,481 | 18,907 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
113,163 | 153,905 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 152,644 | $ | 172,812 | ||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Electronics for Imaging, Inc.
1. Basis of Presentation
The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Electronics for Imaging, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), as of and for the interim period ended September 30, 2004, have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, contained in the Companys Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-K. The December 31, 2003 Consolidated Balance Sheet was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In the opinion of management, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company and the results of its operations and cash flows, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements referred to above and the notes thereto. Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
Amounts within the financial statements and footnote disclosures have been recorded in thousands except for per share data.
The preparation of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
The interim results of the Company are subject to fluctuation. As a result, the Company believes the results of operations for the interim period ended September 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or the full year.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
EITF 04-08
The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) reached a consensus on Issue No. 04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share at its September 29-30, 2004 meeting. The effective date has not been finalized but is expected to be for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004. Under EITF Issue No. 04-8, net earnings and diluted shares outstanding, used for earnings per share calculations, would be retroactively restated using the if-converted method of accounting to reflect the contingent issuance of 9,084 shares under our outstanding 1.50% Convertible Senior Debentures which were issued in June 2003. Fully diluted earnings per share would have been approximately $0.48 for the year ended December 31, 2003 and $0.62 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 as compared to $0.48 and $0.67 as reported for the same periods, respectively.
For the nine | For the year | |||||||
months ended | ended | |||||||
September 30, |
December 31, |
|||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Net Income |
$ | 37,206 | $ | 26,508 | ||||
Add back: Interest expense & debt issuance
cost amortization related to convertible
debentures |
2,624 | 2,098 | ||||||
Income available to common stockholders
plus assumed conversion |
$ | 39,830 | $ | 28,606 | ||||
Basic shares |
53,934 | 53,789 | ||||||
Dilutive effect of options |
1,334 | 1,050 | ||||||
Dilutive effect of debentures |
9,084 | 5,299 | ||||||
64,352 | 60,138 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.62 | $ | 0.48 | ||||
6
3. Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by SFAS No. 137, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Deferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133, and SFAS No. 138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an Amendment of SFAS No. 133 requires companies to reflect the fair value of all derivative instruments, including those embedded in other contracts, as assets or liabilities in an entitys balance sheet. The Company determined that its only derivative is an embedded derivative in its 1.50% Senior Convertible Debentures, which was determined to have an insignificant value.
4. Stock-based Employee Compensation
As permitted under SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended, the Company has elected to use the intrinsic value method as set forth in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Accordingly, no stock-based compensation costs related to stock options have been recorded in the income statement. The Company has determined pro forma net earnings and net earnings per share information as if the fair value method described in SFAS 123 had been applied to its employee stock-based compensation and had been recognized as compensation expense.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||||
Net income |
As reported | $ | 16,059 | $ | 12,249 | $ | 37,206 | $ | 25,442 | |||||||||||
Add: Stock-based employee
compensation expenses for
restricted grants included in
reported net income, net of
related tax effect |
96 | | 279 | | ||||||||||||||||
Deduct: Stock-based employee
compensation expense determined
under the fair value based
method for all awards, net of
related tax effects |
(3,826 | ) | (3,431 | ) | (13,627 | ) | (10,941 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net income |
Pro forma | $ | 12,329 | $ | 8,818 | $ | 23,858 | $ | 14,501 | |||||||||||
Earnings per basic common share |
As reported | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.47 | |||||||||||
Pro forma | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.44 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per diluted common share |
As reported | $ | 0.30 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.47 | |||||||||||
Pro forma | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||||||
5. Comprehensive Income
The Companys comprehensive income, which includes net income, market valuation adjustments and currency translation adjustments, is as follows:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(unaudited) |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,059 | $ | 12,249 | $ | 37,206 | $ | 25,442 | ||||||||
Change in market valuation of investments, net of tax |
1,117 | (512 | ) | (1,691 | ) | (1,517 | ) | |||||||||
Change in currency translation adjustment |
(34 | ) | (228 | ) | (316 | ) | 764 | |||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 17,142 | $ | 11,509 | $ | 35,199 | $ | 24,689 | ||||||||
7
6. Earnings Per Share
The following table represents unaudited disclosures of basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods presented below:
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(unaudited) |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
||||||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders |
$ | 16,059 | $ | 12,249 | $ | 37,206 | $ | 25,442 | ||||||||
Shares |
||||||||||||||||
Basic shares |
53,746 | 52,467 | 53,934 | 53,734 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities |
568 | 1,127 | 1,334 | 835 | ||||||||||||
Diluted Shares
|
54,314 | 53,594 | 55,268 | 54,569 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per common share |
||||||||||||||||
Basic EPS |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.69 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Diluted EPS |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.23 | $ | 0.67 | $ | 0.47 | ||||||||
Anti-dilutive weighted average shares of common stock of 3,264 and 4,881 as of September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, have been excluded from the effect of dilutive securities because the options exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock for the periods then ended. The convertible debentures issued June 4, 2003 are considered contingently convertible securities and were excluded from the earnings per share calculations for all periods presented. The debentures represent 9,084 potential shares of common stock issuable upon conversion. See Note 2 for further discussion regarding the contingently convertible securities and potential dilution.
7. Acquisitions
2003 Acquisitions
Best GmbH
In January 2003 the Company acquired Best GmbH, a German-based software company that provides proofing products for worldwide print and publishing markets, for approximately $9,585 in cash. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination and accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their fair values on the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Cash acquired |
$ | 196 | ||
Other tangible assets |
1,594 | |||
In-process research and development |
1,220 | |||
Acquired technology |
2,080 | |||
Trademarks and trade names, license and distributor relationships |
240 | |||
Other intangible assets |
2,620 | |||
Goodwill |
5,341 | |||
13,291 | ||||
Liabilities assumed |
(1,754 | ) | ||
Deferred tax liability related to assets acquired |
(1,952 | ) | ||
$ | 9,585 | |||
8
The amounts allocated to intangible assets are being amortized using the straight-line method over their respective estimated useful lives; developed technology has a five-year life and all other acquired intangibles have a ten-year life.
The acquisition complements the Companys strengths in graphic arts and workflow software, adding a range of pre-print, pre-press and remote proofing solutions for inkjet printers to its product portfolio.
Printcafe Software, Inc.
In October 2003 the Company acquired Printcafe Software, Inc. (Printcafe) for total consideration of approximately $33,401, paid in cash and common stock of the Company. Approximately 12,877 shares of Printcafe common stock were issued and outstanding on that date, of which approximately 8,813 shares of Printcafe common stock were redeemed for $22,916 and approximately 1,927 shares of Printcafe common stock were exchanged for approximately 202 shares of the Companys common stock, valued at $5,011. The remaining 2,126 shares of stock were acquired by the Company for $5,529 earlier in 2003. The Company applied the equity method of accounting for its investment in Printcafe and accordingly recorded a charge of $1,562 based upon its share of Printcafes losses for the pre-acquisition period. The Company incurred $941 of capitalized transaction-related costs including legal fees, accounting fees and other consulting fees and assumed stock options with a fair value of $566. The Company assumed liabilities in excess of assets on the date of acquisition of $14,906. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination and accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition as follows:
Cash acquired |
$ | 604 | ||
Other tangible assets acquired |
19,096 | |||
In-process research and development |
8,600 | |||
Acquired technology |
7,400 | |||
Trademarks and trade names |
700 | |||
Other intangible assets |
19,100 | |||
Goodwill |
12,508 | |||
68,008 | ||||
Liabilities assumed |
(34,607 | ) | ||
$ | 33,401 | |||
The amounts allocated to intangible assets are being amortized using the straight-line method over their respective estimated useful lives; developed technology has a four-year life and all other acquired intangibles, including customer relationships, have a five-year life.
With the addition of the Printcafe suite of products, the Company can now offer a full range of products for the commercial print market. Printcafes market position in print supply chain management will allow the Company to offer both printers and their customers powerful end-to-end solutions to maximize their efficiency and profitability. By increasing its sales to distributors and end-users with the Printcafe direct sales force, the Company also lessened its revenue dependency on its traditional customer base.
T/R Systems, Inc.
In November 2003 the Company acquired T/R Systems, Inc., for approximately $20,021 in cash. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination and accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Cash overdraft acquired |
$ | (208 | ) | |
Other tangible assets acquired |
11,968 | |||
In-process research and development |
3,400 | |||
Acquired technology |
5,600 | |||
Trademarks and trade names |
200 | |||
Other intangible assets |
1,300 | |||
Goodwill |
5,325 | |||
27,585 | ||||
Liabilities assumed |
(7,564 | ) | ||
$ | 20,021 | |||
9
The amounts allocated to intangible assets are being amortized using the straight-line method over their respective estimated useful lives; developed technology has a three-year life, customer relationships have a four-year life and the remaining acquired intangibles have a five- to seven-year life.
T/R Systemss Micropress engine enhanced our black-and-white server offerings. T/R also provided us access to a web-based document submission program.
2004
Acquisitions
Automated Dispatch Systems Inc.
In February 2004 the Company acquired Automated Dispatch Systems, Inc. (ADS), for approximately $11,811 in cash. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination and accordingly, the purchase price has been allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed on the basis of their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The following table summarizes the allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Cash |
$ | 261 | ||
Other tangible assets |
336 | |||
In-process research and development |
1,000 | |||
Acquired technology |
3,700 | |||
Other intangible assets |
1,200 | |||
Goodwill |
9,440 | |||
15,937 | ||||
Liabilities assumed |
(1,791 | ) | ||
Deferred tax liability related to assets acquired |
(2,335 | ) | ||
$ | 11,811 | |||
The amounts allocated to intangible assets are being amortized using the straight-line method over their respective estimated useful lives; developed technology has a three-year life, customer relationships have a four-year life and the remaining acquired intangibles have a five-year life.
With the addition of ADSs technology, the Company hopes to further develop relationships with equipment distributors, such as Ikon and Danka. The automated equipment maintenance systems from ADS also offers excellent synergies with the Companys product portfolio for the office equipment channel.
Valuation Methodology
Intangible assets acquired consist of developed technology, patents, trademarks and trade names and customer relationships. The amount allocated to the purchased in-process research and development (IPR&D) was determined using established valuation techniques and was expensed upon acquisition because technological feasibility had not been established and no future alternative uses existed. The value of this IPR&D was determined by estimating the costs to develop the purchased IPR&D into a commercially viable product, estimating the resulting net cash flows from the sale of the products resulting from the completion of the IPR&D and discounting the net cash flows back to their present value at rates ranging from 25% to 30%. The percentage of completion for in-process projects acquired ranged from 10% to 90%. Schedules were based on managements estimate of tasks completed and the tasks to be completed to bring the project to technical and commercial feasibility. IPR&D was included in operating expenses as part of other acquisition-related charges. There have been no significant changes to managements original estimates.
Pro forma Information
10
The unaudited pro forma information set forth below represents the revenues, net income and earnings per share of the Company and its 2003 and 2004 acquisitions as if the acquisitions were effective as of the beginning of the periods presented and includes certain pro forma adjustments, including the adjustment of amortization expense to reflect purchase price allocations, interest income to reflect net cash used for the purchase and the related income tax effects of these adjustments. All acquisitions are included in the Companys financial statements from the date of acquisition.
The unaudited pro forma information is not intended to represent or be indicative of the consolidated results of operations of EFI that would have been reported had the acquisitions been completed as of the beginning of the periods presented and should not be taken as representative of the future consolidated results of operations or financial condition of EFI.
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 97,586 | $ | 111,613 | $ | 315,457 | $ | 316,438 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 16,059 | $ | 7,770 | $ | 38,837 | $ | 11,376 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per common share |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.71 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per common share |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.70 | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||
2004 Divestiture
In February 2004 the Company sold certain assets related to its Unimobile business for cash of $5,259, including $1,052 of cash held in escrow for up to eighteen months after the sale. The Company recognized a gain on sale of $2,994 after accounting for the intangible and tangible assets of $1,808 and related liabilities of $588.
8. Balance Sheet Components
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
Accounts receivable: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
$ | 57,993 | $ | 57,212 | ||||
Less allowances |
(2,501 | ) | (3,895 | ) | ||||
$ | 55,492 | $ | 53,317 | |||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 3,204 | $ | 5,542 | ||||
Finished goods |
1,947 | 2,447 | ||||||
$ | 5,151 | $ | 7,989 | |||||
Other current assets: |
||||||||
Deferred income taxes, current portion |
$ | 24,513 | $ | 23,725 | ||||
Receivable from subcontract manufacturers |
1,545 | 938 | ||||||
Other |
2,948 | 4,055 | ||||||
$ | 29,006 | $ | 28,718 | |||||
11
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
Property and equipment: |
||||||||
Land, building and improvements |
$ | 36,997 | $ | 38,857 | ||||
Equipment and purchased software |
46,407 | 45,733 | ||||||
Furniture and leasehold improvements |
13,581 | 13,994 | ||||||
96,985 | 98,584 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(52,748 | ) | (49,490 | ) | ||||
$ | 44,237 | $ | 49,094 | |||||
Other assets: |
||||||||
Deferred income taxes, non-current, net |
$ | 23,481 | $ | 12,788 | ||||
Debt issuance costs, net |
5,057 | 5,953 | ||||||
Other |
2,627 | 743 | ||||||
$ | 31,165 | $ | 19,484 | |||||
Accrued and other liabilities: |
||||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
$ | 15,565 | $ | 18,993 | ||||
Deferred revenue |
15,023 | 14,070 | ||||||
Accrued warranty provision |
1,983 | 2,103 | ||||||
Accrued royalty payments |
7,185 | 7,916 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
23,907 | 24,304 | ||||||
$ | 63,663 | $ | 67,386 | |||||
9. Goodwill and Other Identified Intangible Assets
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Life |
Amount |
Amortization |
Amount |
Amount |
Amortization |
Amount |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
$ | 86,838 | $ | (10,279 | ) | $ | 76,559 | $ | 77,445 | $ | (10,279 | ) | $ | 67,166 | ||||||||||||||
Acquired technology |
5.8 yrs | $ | 37,759 | $ | (15,430 | ) | $ | 22,329 | $ | 36,281 | $ | (10,472 | ) | $ | 25,809 | |||||||||||||
Trademarks and trade
names |
5.1 yrs | 10,684 | (6,393 | ) | 4,291 | 11,186 | (4,780 | ) | 6,406 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets |
4.5 yrs | 20,699 | (3,639 | ) | 17,060 | 19,525 | (708 | ) | 18,817 | |||||||||||||||||||
Amortizable intangible
assets |
5.4 yrs | $ | 69,142 | $ | (25,462 | ) | $ | 43,680 | $ | 66,992 | $ | (15,960 | ) | $ | 51,032 | |||||||||||||
As required under SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the Company performed its annual review as of July 1, 2004 and determined that no impairments needed to be recorded against the goodwill account at that time. The acquisition of ADS and additional purchase price adjustments associated with prior year acquisitions increased goodwill by $9,379 for the first nine months of 2004.
Aggregate amortization expense for amortizable intangible assets was $3,520 and $10,515 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively and $1,330 and $3,988 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively. As of September 30, 2004 future estimated amortization expense related to amortizable intangible assets is estimated to be:
2004 |
$ | 3,198 | ||
2005 |
12,791 | |||
2006 |
12,451 | |||
2007 |
9,603 | |||
2008 and thereafter |
5,637 |
12
10. Long-term Debt
On June 4, 2003 the Company sold $240,000 of its 1.50% convertible senior debentures due in 2023 (the Debentures) in a private placement. The Debentures have been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant to a registration statement declared effective in January 2004. The Debentures are unsecured senior obligations of the Company, paying interest semi-annually in arrears at an annual rate of 1.50%. Additional interest at a rate of 0.35% per annum will be paid if the average market price of the debentures for the five trading days ending on the third trading day immediately preceding the first day of the relevant six-month period equals 120% or more of the principal amount of the debentures, beginning in the sixth year after issuance. The Debentures are convertible before maturity into 9,084 shares of EFI common stock at a conversion price of approximately $26.42 per share of common stock but only upon the stock trading at or above $31.70 per share for 20 consecutive trading days during the last 30 consecutive trading days of the preceding fiscal quarter, or upon the occurrence of certain other specified events. None of the events that would cause the Debentures to be convertible have occurred at this time. The Company may redeem the Debentures at its option, on or after June 1, 2008 at a redemption price equal to par plus accrued interest, if any. In addition, holders of the Debentures may require the Company to repurchase all or some of the Debentures on June 1, 2008, 2013 and 2018 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount plus accrued interest, including contingent interest, if any. The Company will pay the repurchase price for any debentures repurchased on June 1, 2008 in cash, but may choose to pay the repurchase price in cash, common stock of the Company, or any combination thereof in 2013 and 2018. Additionally, a holder may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of that holders debentures if a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture, occurs prior to June 1, 2008 at 100% of their principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent interest, if any. The Company may choose to pay the repurchase price in cash, common stock of the Company, or any combination thereof.
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
1.50% convertible
debentures due June 1,
2023, with interest
payable semi-annually on
June 1 and December 1 |
$ | 240,000 | $ | 240,000 | ||||
Bonds due to City of
Foster City, variable
interest rate, interest
and principal payments
due semi-annually |
224 | 236 | ||||||
$ | 240,224 | $ | 240,236 | |||||
Maturities of long-term debt are approximately $24 per year for the next five years.
11. Income Taxes
During the third quarter of 2004, the tax provision reflects the one time effect of the resolution of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examination of the Companys federal income tax returns filed for the years 1999 through 2001. As a result of the settlement reached with the IRS for these years, the Company was required to remit $0.6 million in tax deficiencies and related interest and utilized $6.4 million in credit carry forwards available to offset income taxes payable in future periods.
In addition and as a result of such settlement, the Company has reversed previously accrued taxes of approximately $7.8 million related to the foreign sales corporation and research and development tax credit matters as such tax liabilities are no longer required.
Also, during the third quarter of 2004, the Company has evaluated the business objectives and financial requirements of its domestic and international operations and determined that it intends to permanently reinvest $29.0 million of unremitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries reported for the periods through 2003. Therefore, the tax provision also reflects a benefit of $11.1 million from the reversal of the previously recorded deferred tax liability associated with those earnings.
The net impact of these events for the three months ended September 30, 2004 is a net income tax benefit of $18.9 million. The effective tax rate was a benefit of 357% and a provision of 27% for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Excluding the net income tax benefit of $18.9 million, the Companys effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was a benefit of 54%.
The effective tax rate was a benefit of 52.5% and a provision of 27% for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Excluding the net income tax benefit of $18.9 million, the Companys effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was a provision of 25%.
For the 2004 year, the rate was negatively impacted due to the in-process research and development write-off related to the ADS acquisition, the expiration of the United States research and development credit on June 30, 2004, and decreased investments in tax-exempt securities. In each period, the Company benefited from tax-exempt interest income, research and development credits, and benefits from foreign sales in achieving a consolidated effective tax rate lower than that prescribed by the respective Federal and State taxing authorities.
On October 4, 2004, the Working Families Tax Relief Act was signed renewing the federal tax laws regarding the research and development credit. In accordance with FASB 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, the benefit of this reinstatement will be reflected in the Companys fourth quarter tax provision.
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Off-Balance Sheet Financing - Synthetic Lease Arrangement
The Company is a party to two synthetic leases (the 301 Lease and the 303 Lease, together Leases) covering its Foster City facilities located at 301 and 303 Velocity Way, Foster City, California. Both Leases expire in July 2014. The Company may, at its option, purchase the facilities during or at the end of the term of the leases for the amount expended by the lessor to purchase the facilities ($56,850 for the 303 Lease and $31,730 for the 301 Lease). The Company has guaranteed to the lessor a residual value associated with the buildings equal to 82% of their funding of the respective Leases. Under the financial covenants, the Company must maintain a minimum net worth and a minimum tangible net worth as of the end of each quarter. There is an additional covenant regarding mergers. The Company is in compliance with all of the covenants at the time of this filing. The Company is liable to the lessor for the financed amount of the buildings if it defaults on its covenants.
13
The Company has assessed its exposure in relation to the first loss guarantees under the Leases and believes that there is no deficiency to the guaranteed value at September 30, 2004. If there is a decline in value, the Company will record a loss associated with the residual value guarantee. The funds pledged under the Leases ($56,850 for the 303 Lease and $31,730 for the 301 Lease at September 30, 2004) are in LIBOR-based interest bearing accounts and are restricted as to withdrawal at all times. In conjunction with the Leases, the Company has entered into separate ground leases with the lessor for approximately 30 years.
The Company is treated as the owner of these buildings for federal income tax purposes.
As part of the amended financing arrangement for the 301 Lease, the Company was required to complete a valuation of the building located at 301 Velocity Way. Under the original financing agreement, upon termination of the original lease the Company guaranteed the lessor an 82% residual value in the building which cost $43,080. The recent valuation has provided a value of approximately $31,730, and the Company paid $11,350 to the lessor and recorded a one-time loss associated with the original lease in the third quarter of 2004. In addition, the Company was required to write off $852 of capitalized lease costs associated with the original lease.
Effective July 1, 2003, the Company has applied the accounting and disclosure rules set forth in Interpretation No. 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as revised (FIN 46R) for variable interest entities (VIEs). The Company has evaluated its synthetic lease agreements to determine if the arrangements qualify as variable interest entities under FIN 46R. The Company determined that the synthetic lease agreements do qualify as VIEs; however, because the Company is not the primary beneficiary under FIN 46R it is not required to consolidate the VIEs in the financial statements.
Purchase Commitments
The Company sub-contracts with other companies to manufacture its products. During the normal course of business the sub-contractors procure components based upon orders placed by the Company. If the Company cancels all or part of the order, it may still be liable to the sub-contractors for the cost of the components purchased by the sub-contractors for placement in its products. The Company periodically reviews the potential liability and the adequacy of the related reserve. The Companys consolidated financial position and results of operations could be negatively impacted if the Company were required to compensate the sub-contract manufacturers for amounts in excess of the related reserve.
Product Warranties
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others (FIN 45) requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must disclose and recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. The Companys products are generally accompanied by a 12-month warranty, which covers both parts and labor. The Company accrues for warranty costs as part of its cost of sales based on associated material product costs and technical support labor costs. The warranty provision is based upon historical experience by product, configuration and geographic region.
Changes in the warranty reserves for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | 2,103 | $ | 2,515 | ||||
Provision for warranty during the period |
1,418 | 1,257 | ||||||
Settlements |
(1,538 | ) | (1,693 | ) | ||||
Balance at September 30 |
$ | 1,983 | $ | 2,079 | ||||
Legal Proceedings
Over the past several years, Mr. Jan R. Coyle, an individual living in Nevada, has repeatedly demanded that the Company buy technology allegedly invented by his company, Kolbet Labs. In December 2001, Mr. Coyle threatened to sue the Company and its customers for allegedly infringing his soon to be issued patent and for allegedly misappropriating his alleged trade secrets. The Company believes Mr. Coyles claims are baseless and completely
14
without merit. Therefore, on December 11, 2001, the Company filed a declaratory relief action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, asking the Court to declare that the Company and its customers have not breached any nondisclosure agreement with Mr. Coyle or Kolbet Labs, nor has it infringed any alleged patent claims or misappropriated any alleged trade secrets belonging to Mr. Coyle or Kolbet Labs through its sale of Fiery, Splash or EDOX print controllers. The Company also sought an injunction enjoining both Mr. Coyle and Kolbet Labs from bringing or threatening to bring a lawsuit against the Company, its suppliers, vendors, customers and users of its products for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. On March 26, 2002, the Northern District of California Court dismissed the Companys complaint citing the Courts lack of jurisdiction over Mr. Coyle. The Company appealed the Courts dismissal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington D.C., who reversed the dismissal of our case and remanded it back to the Northern District of California Court. Mr. Coyle and Kolbet Labs subsequently moved to dismiss our complaint under the Declaratory Judgment Act. The Court granted dismissal on February 17, 2004. On February 17, 2004, the Company filed a second declaratory relief action in the Northern District of California against Mr. Coyle and Kolbet Labs. The Company appealed that ruling to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., which heard oral arguments on October 4, 2004. Their decision is pending. The Company is pursuing both of its cases against Mr. Coyle and Kolbet Labs.
On February 26, 2002, Mr. Coyles company, J&L Electronics, filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada alleging patent infringement, breach of non-disclosure agreements, misappropriation of trade secrets, violations of federal antitrust law and related causes of action. The Company denied all of the allegations and management believed this lawsuit to be without merit. On March 28, 2003, the Federal District Judge dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over the Company. J&L Electronics appealed the dismissal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On February 9, 2004, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of J&L Electronics complaint. J&L appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court who denied his petition on January 12, 2004. Although Mr. Coyle lost both of his appeals, he caused J&L Electronics to initiate yet another legal action, this time in Arizona.
On May 3, 2004, J&L Electronics, filed a complaint against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona alleging patent infringement, breach of non-disclosure agreements, misappropriation of trade secrets, violations of federal antitrust law and related causes of action. The Company has moved to have that legal action dismissed or transferred to California. The Company believes that the patent is invalid and the lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend itself accordingly.
On June 25, 2003, a securities class action complaint was filed against Printcafe Software, Inc., now a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and certain of Printcafes officers in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 due to allegedly false and misleading statements in connection with Printcafes initial public offering and subsequent press releases. The Company acquired Printcafe in October 2003. On June 28, 2004, an amended complaint was filed in the action adding additional Printcafe directors as defendants. The Company believes that the lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend itself accordingly.
Because of the uncertainties related to both the amount and range of loss on the pending litigation matters, the Company is unable to make a reasonable estimate of the liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome. Pending or future litigation could be costly, could cause the diversion of managements attention and could upon resolution, have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations financial condition and cash flow.
In addition, the Company is involved from time to time in litigation relating to claims arising in the normal course of its business.
Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement or other possible claims made by third parties arising from the use of our products. Historically, costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnification provisions on our future results of operations.
As permitted under Delaware law, we have agreements whereby we indemnify our executive officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was serving, at our request in such capacity. The indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officers or directors lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and enables us to
15
recover a portion of any future amounts paid. We believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, beliefs, expectations, forecasts and intentions. The cautionary statements made in this document should be read as applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this document. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed herein. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include those discussed below in Factors that Could Adversely Affect Performance, as well as those discussed elsewhere herein. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update any forward- looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported. Please see the discussion of critical accounting policies in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
Results of Operations
The following tables set forth items in our condensed consolidated statements of income as a percentage of total revenue for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and the percentage change from 2004 over 2003. These operating results are not necessarily indicative of our results for any future period.
16
Three Months Ended September 30, |
% Change 2004 over |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
% Change 2004 over |
|||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenue |
100 | % | 100 | % | | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||||
Cost of revenue |
35 | % | 39 | % | (10 | )% | 35 | % | 40 | % | 1 | % | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
65 | % | 61 | % | 7 | % | 65 | % | 60 | % | 25 | % | ||||||||||||
Research and development |
29 | % | 24 | % | 20 | % | 27 | % | 26 | % | 19 | % | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
18 | % | 15 | % | 22 | % | 18 | % | 16 | % | 28 | % | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
7 | % | 6 | % | 31 | % | 7 | % | 6 | % | 33 | % | ||||||||||||
Real estate related charges |
15 | % | | n/a | 5 | % | | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
Amortization of identified
intangibles and other
acquisition-related expense |
4 | % | 1 | % | 165 | % | 4 | % | 2 | % | 121 | % | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
73 | % | 46 | % | 58 | % | 61 | % | 50 | % | 38 | % | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income from operations |
(8 | )% | 15 | % | (156 | )% | 4 | % | 10 | % | (40 | )% | ||||||||||||
Interest and other income |
4 | % | 3 | % | 12 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | 7 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(2 | )% | (1 | )% | 42 | % | (1 | )% | (1 | )% | 168 | % | ||||||||||||
Loss on equity investment |
| (1 | )% | (100 | )% | | | (100 | )% | |||||||||||||||
Litigation settlement income |
| 2 | % | (100 | )% | | 1 | % | (96 | )% | ||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of assets |
| | | 1 | % | | | |||||||||||||||||
Total interest and other income, net |
2 | % | 3 | % | (36 | )% | 3 | % | 3 | % | 3 | % | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income before income taxes |
(6 | )% | 18 | % | (137 | )% | 7 | % | 13 | % | (31 | )% | ||||||||||||
Benefit from (provision for) income taxes |
23 | % | (5 | )% | (565 | )% | 4 | % | (4 | )% | (232 | )% | ||||||||||||
Net income |
17 | % | 13 | % | 31 | % | 11 | % | 9 | % | 46 | % | ||||||||||||
Revenue
We classify our revenue into three major categories, Servers, Embedded Products and Professional Printing Applications, along with a Miscellaneous category for other sources of revenue. The first category, Servers, is made up of stand-alone servers, which connect digital copiers with computer networks. This category includes the Fiery, Splash, Edox, and MicroPress color and black and white server products. The second category, Embedded Products, consists of embedded desktop controllers, bundled solutions and design-licensed solutions primarily for the office market. The third category, Professional Printing Applications, consists of software technology centered on printing workflow, print management information systems, proofing and web submission and job tracking tools. Miscellaneous revenue consists of spares, and the enterprise solutions suite of products consisting of scanning solutions, field dispatching solutions and mobile printing solutions.
Our revenues were relatively flat at $97.6 million in the third quarter of 2004, compared to $97.3 million in the third quarter of 2003, with a 37% decrease in unit volume between the two periods. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, revenues were $313.4 million, a 15% increase over the same period in 2003, while the unit volume decreased by 21%. Sales of our higher-margin stand-alone servers and professional printing applications accounted for a significant portion of revenue for both the three-month and nine- month period comparisons, while the decrease in volume was primarily driven by reduced sales of our lower-margin embedded products and the divestiture of eBeam.
The following is a breakdown of categories of revenue, both in terms of absolute dollars and as a percentage (%) of total revenue. Also shown is volume as a percentage (%) of total units shipped by product category.
17
Revenue
Three Months Ended September 30, |
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
% |
2004 |
2003 |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
$ |
% |
$ |
% |
Change |
$ |
% |
$ |
% |
Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Servers |
$ | 43.0 | 44 | % | $ | 39.5 | 41 | % | 9 | % | $ | 139.5 | 45 | % | $ | 117.8 | 43 | % | 18 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Embedded Products |
30.2 | 31 | % | 45.5 | 47 | % | (34) | % | 98.6 | 31 | % | 112.5 | 41 | % | (12 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Professional
Printing
Applications |
16.8 | 17 | % | 3.5 | 4 | % | 374 | % | 50.4 | 16 | % | 10.8 | 4 | % | 365 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous |
7.6 | 8 | % | 8.8 | 8 | % | (13 | )% | 24.9 | 8 | % | 30.6 | 12 | % | (18 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Revenue |
$ | 97.6 | 100 | % | $ | 97.3 | 100 | % | <1 | % | $ | 313.4 | 100 | % | $ | 271.7 | 100 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Volume
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
% Change |
2004 |
2003 |
% Change |
|||||||||||||||||||
Servers |
25 | % | 16 | % | 2 | % | 25 | % | 17 | % | 20 | % | ||||||||||||
Embedded Products |
74 | % | 82 | % | (43 | )% | 74 | % | 77 | % | (24 | )% | ||||||||||||
Professional Printing Applications |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Miscellaneous |
1 | % | 2 | % | (74 | )% | 1 | % | 6 | % | (88 | )% | ||||||||||||
Total Volume |
100 | % | 100 | % | (37 | )% | 100 | % | 100 | % | (21 | )% | ||||||||||||
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, the Servers category made up 44% of total revenue, a 9% increase over the same period in 2003. For the same period comparison, the volume of servers shipped increased 2%. The Servers category made up 45% of total revenue and 25% of total unit volume for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 and it made up 43% of total revenue and approximately 17% of total unit volume for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2003. For both the three-month and nine-month period comparisons, the increase in revenue and increase in unit volume in this category was due in part to the launch of a new series of Fiery servers in the fourth quarter of 2003 and to sales of our Micropress server product, a product of T/R Systems, a company we acquired in November 2003.
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2004, the Embedded Products category made up 31% of total revenue, a 34% decrease over the same period in 2003. The Embedded Products category made up 31% of total revenue and 74% of total unit volume for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004. It made up approximately 41% of total revenue and 77% of total unit volume for the same period a year ago. The decrease in both comparisons is the result of a shift in demand to lower-cost products in the office and a delay in new product introductions. Since our share of the lower-cost products segment of this market is relatively small, the shift in demand to lower cost products from the higher-cost engines has resulted in slower sales of our products in this category. A significant percentage of our embedded product revenue is attributable to EFIs design-licensed solutions, which have a lower average selling price but higher gross margin than our other embedded products. Although the amount of design license solutions as a percentage of the total revenue in the Embedded Products category is growing, decreased demand in the embedded board products has put additional pressure on the top-line results in this category.
18
For the three-months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the Professional Printing Applications category made up 17% and 4% of total revenue, respectively. For the nine-months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the Professional Printing Applications category made up 16% and 4% of total revenue, respectively. The majority of the increase in this category for both comparisons came from the print management information system products acquired through the Printcafe transaction in addition to substantial growth in the other software products such as our graphic arts package and color profiler. We recorded an approximate 32% revenue growth for the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003 when the pre-acquisition revenues from the acquired companies are added to our revenues in the prior year. The organic growth in this category can be attributed to stability in the former Printcafe operations, which has resulted in increased sales as well as growth in software offerings sold as upgrade options with our servers. Because this category consists of software sales, we do not have any associated unit volumes.
The Miscellaneous category has remained flat at 8% of total revenue in the three-month period ended September 30, 2003 and 2004 while volumes in this category decreased from 2% of total volume to 1% of total volume for the same period comparison. The Miscellaneous category has decreased from 12% of total revenue in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2003 to 8% of total revenue in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 while volumes in this category decreased from 6% of total volume to 1% of total volume for the same period comparison. The decrease in revenue is mostly attributable to reduced sales of spare components, the divestiture of the eBeam product line and the sale of the Unimobile assets, partially offset with the revenue from ADS which was acquired in February 2004. The decrease in volume is due to the divestiture of the eBeam product line, which in the first 9 months of 2003 accounted for 91% of the volumes in this category.
To the extent our major product categories do not grow over time in absolute terms, or if we are not able to meet demand for higher unit volumes, it could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. There can be no assurance that any new controller products that we introduce in the future will be qualified by all or any of our OEM customers; or that such products, or any of our other products, will successfully compete, be accepted by the market, or otherwise effectively replace the volume of revenue and/or income from our older products. Market acceptance of our software products, products acquired through acquisitions and other newly introduced, internally developed products cannot be assured.
We also believe that in addition to the factors described above, price reductions for all of our products will affect revenues in the future. We have previously and will likely in the future reduce prices for our products. Depending upon the price-elasticity of demand for our products, the pricing and quality of competitive products, and other economic and competitive conditions, such price reductions may have an adverse impact on our revenues and profits. While we have managed to improve gross margins in the past through the utilization of fewer contract manufacturers, obtaining favorable component pricing from our suppliers and through an increase in higher gross margin software sales and design license sales, this trend may not continue. If we are not able to compensate for lower gross margins resulting from price reductions with increased sales volumes, our results of operations could be adversely affected. In addition, our revenue in the future may depend more upon sales of products with relatively lower gross margins such as embedded controllers or sales of our design-licensed solutions, which have lower per unit sales prices, but higher gross margins. If we are not able to compensate for such lower gross margins, or lower per unit revenues with an increased volume of sales of such products, our results of operations may be adversely affected.
Revenue and volume by geographic area for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | % of $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
$ |
% |
volume |
$ |
% |
volume |
change |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 54.9 | 56 | % | 35 | % | $ | 47.1 | 49 | % | 31 | % | 16 | % | ||||||||||||||
Europe |
24.4 | 25 | % | 20 | % | 27.2 | 28 | % | 21 | % | (10 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Japan |
14.2 | 15 | % | 41 | % | 19.8 | 20 | % | 40 | % | (28 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Rest of World |
4.1 | 4 | % | 4 | % | 3.2 | 3 | % | 8 | % | 28 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total Revenue |
$ | 97.6 | 100 | % | 100 | % | $ | 97.3 | 100 | % | 100 | % | <1 | % | ||||||||||||||
19
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
% of | % of | % of $ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
$ |
% |
volume |
$ |
% |
volume |
change |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Americas |
$ | 173.3 | 55 | % | 33 | % | $ | 133.7 | 49 | % | 34 | % | 30 | % | ||||||||||||||
Europe |
83.9 | 27 | % | 24 | % | 84.4 | 31 | % | 25 | % | (1 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Japan |
44.2 | 14 | % | 39 | % | 40.6 | 15 | % | 26 | % | 9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Rest of World |
12.0 | 4 | % | 4 | % | 13.0 | 5 | % | 15 | % | (8 | )% | ||||||||||||||||
Total Revenue |
$ | 313.4 | 100 | % | 100 | % | $ | 271.7 | 100 | % | 100 | % | 15 | % | ||||||||||||||
The Americas region increased 30% to $173.3 million in sales during the first nine months of 2004 from approximately $133.7 million in the first nine months of 2003, largely attributable to sales of the newly acquired products from Printcafe and ADS, as well as increases in the server category. Revenues in the Japan region increased 9% to $44.2 million during the first nine months of 2004 from $40.6 million in the first nine months of 2003. A significant portion of this increase can be attributed to greater demand for design-licensed color solutions, which are sold to OEM customers in Japan, for incorporation into their products, which are then shipped from Japan to other countries. The Rest-of-World region, which includes the Asia Pacific but excludes Japan, showed a decrease of 8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 largely due to design license products being shipped to Japan rather than directly into the region. A decrease in embedded products revenue partially offset by increases in the server and professional printing application revenue fueled an overall moderate decrease in Europe.
Shipments to some of our OEM customers are made to centralized purchasing and manufacturing locations, which in turn sell through to other locations, making it difficult to obtain accurate geographical shipment data. Accordingly, we believe that export sales of our products into each region may differ from what is reported. We expect that export sales will continue to represent a significant portion of our total revenue.
Substantially all of our revenue for the last three years was attributable to sales of products through our OEM customers and independent distributor channels. During 2004, we have continued to work on both increasing the number of OEM customers and expanding the size of existing relationships with OEM customers. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, three customers Canon, Konica Minolta, and Xerox provided more than 10% of our revenue individually and approximately 65% of our revenue in aggregate for 2004 and 71% of revenue in aggregate for 2003. No assurance can be given that our relationships with these and other significant OEM customers will continue or that we will be successful in increasing the number of our OEM customers or the size of our existing OEM relationships. Several of our OEM customers have reduced or discontinued their purchases from us at various times in the past and any customer could do so in the future. Such reductions or discontinuations have in the past and could in the future have a significant negative impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.
In addition to our server and embedded products sold through our OEMs, we have diversified into new markets and distribution channels with our Professional Printing Applications. This category has grown to 17% of our revenue in the third quarter of 2004. We have no significant customers in this category, other than our OEMs who have purchased products from this category as well as from our other categories.
We continue to develop new products and technologies for each of our product lines and intend to continue to introduce new generations of server and controller products and other new product lines with current and new OEM customers, distribution partners, and end-users throughout the remainder of 2004 and beyond. No assurance can be given that the introduction or market acceptance of current or future products will be successful.
20
Gross Margins
For the quarter ended September 30, 2004 our gross margin was 65% compared to approximately 61% for the same period a year ago. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004 our gross margin was 65% compared to approximately 60% for the same period a year ago. The improvement in both comparisons came from increased sales of design-licensed solutions and an increase in software sales both of which traditionally have higher gross margins than our other products. We believe that gross margin will continue to be impacted by a variety of factors. These factors include the market prices that can be achieved on our current and future products, the availability and pricing of key components (including DRAM, Processors, and Postscript interpreter software), third party manufacturing costs, product, channel, and geographic mix, the success of our product transitions and new products, the pace of migration to a design-licensed business model for embedded products, competition with third parties and our OEM customers, and general economic conditions in the United States and abroad. Consequently, we anticipate gross margins will fluctuate from period to period.
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses as a percentage of revenue amounted to approximately 73% and 46% for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and 61% and 50% for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Operating expenses increased by 58% in the three-month period ended September 30, 2004 compared to the three-month period ended September 30, 2003, and increased 38% in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to the same period in 2003. Approximately 55% of the increase quarter over quarter and 28% of the increase year over year is attributable to real estate-related charges. The addition of Printcafe and T/R Systems in late 2003 and ADS in mid-February 2004 contributed the majority of the remaining increase in operating expenses, while increased employee costs, negative impacts of exchange rate variances, and increased legal, auditing and tax-consulting expenses including costs related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 were also a factor.
We anticipate that operating expenses may increase in future periods both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue as investments are made in new business areas and direct and channel relationships in our sales organization.
The components of operating expenses are detailed below.
Research and Development | ||||
Expenses for research and development consist primarily of personnel expenses and, to a lesser extent, consulting, depreciation, and costs of prototype materials. Research and development expenses were 29% and 24% of revenue for the third quarter of 2004 and 2003, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, research and development expenses were 27% and 26% of revenue, respectively. | ||||
In absolute dollars, research and development increased by approximately $4.7 million in the third quarter of 2004 from the third quarter of 2003. Research and development expenses related to our recent acquisitions partially offset by the reduction in costs from the eBeam and Unimobile divestitures contributed the majority of the increase for the quarter ending September 30, 2004. The remaining increase consisted of increased payroll costs from merit increases and increased headcount, partly offset by lower consulting expenses and prototype expenses. | ||||
Research and development expenses increased by approximately $13.5 million year over year for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Research and development expenses related to our recent acquisitions partially offset by the reduction in costs from the eBeam and Unimobile divestitures accounted for the majority of the increase for the nine months ending September 30, 2004. The remaining increase consisted primarily of increased payroll costs from merit increases, and additional employees, partially offset by lower prototype expenses. | ||||
We believe that the development of new products and the enhancement of existing products are essential to our continued success, and intend to continue to devote substantial resources to research and new product development efforts. Accordingly, we expect that our research and development expenses may increase in absolute dollars and also as a percentage of revenue in future periods. |
21
Sales and Marketing | ||||
Sales and marketing expenses include personnel expenses, costs of trade shows, marketing programs, and promotional materials, sales commissions, travel and entertainment expenses, depreciation, and costs associated with sales offices in the United States, Europe, Asia, and other locations around the world. Sales and marketing expenses for the three-month period ended September 30, 2004 were approximately $18.0 million or 18% of revenue compared to approximately $14.7 million or 15% of revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in absolute dollars was approximately $3.3 million for the quarter. Additional costs for acquired companies were partially offset by a decrease in expenses from the spin-off of the Unimobile group accounted for the majority of the increase, while increased tradeshow expenses added most of the balance. In addition, sales and marketing expenses, particularly those incurred in Europe, where we have a significant presence, were negatively impacted by the weakening US dollar, increasing expenses from year to year slightly. While the costs in the local currency outside the United States have generally remained constant, during the third quarter of 2004 the translated US dollar costs have increased. | ||||
Sales and marketing expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004 were approximately $57.0 million or 18% of revenue compared to approximately $44.7 million or 16% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The majority of the increase in absolute dollars of approximately $12.3 million is comprised of costs related to the operations of the acquired companies, offset by a decrease in expenses due to the divestiture of eBeam and Unimobile groups. Expenses for tradeshows increased as well, adversely impacting the nine-month comparison. In addition, sales and marketing expenses, particularly those incurred in Europe, where we have a significant presence, were negatively impacted by the weakening US dollar, increasing expenses slightly from year to year. While the costs in the local currency outside the United States have generally remained constant, during 2004 the translated US dollar costs have increased. | ||||
We expect that our sales and marketing expenses may increase in absolute dollars as we continue to actively promote our products, introduce new products and services, and continue to build our sales and marketing organization, particularly in Europe and Asia Pacific, and as we grow our software solutions and other new product lines which require greater sales and marketing support from us. We also expect that if the US dollar remains volatile against the euro or other currencies, sales and marketing expenses reported in US dollars could fluctuate. | ||||
General and Administrative | ||||
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses and, to a lesser extent, depreciation and facility costs, professional fees, and other costs associated with public companies. General and administrative expenses were approximately $7.2 million or 7% of revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, compared to approximately $5.5 million or 6% of revenue for the quarter ended September 30, 2003. The increase in absolute dollars of approximately $1.7 million primarily came from costs related to the acquired organizations and increased legal, auditing and tax-consulting expenses including costs related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We expect that general and administrative costs will increase both as a percentage of revenue and in absolute dollars in the fourth quarter of 2004 due to additional costs that will be incurred for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We also expect that if the US dollar remains volatile against the euro or other currencies, general and administrative expenses reported in US dollars could fluctuate. | ||||
General and administrative expenses were approximately $20.6 million or 7% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, compared to approximately $15.5 million or 6% of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in absolute dollars of approximately $5.1 million primarily came from costs related to the acquired organizations, increased employee salary and bonus expense, and increased legal, auditing, and tax-consulting expenses including costs related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We expect that general and administrative costs will increase both as a percentage of revenue and in absolute dollars in the fourth quarter of 2004 due to additional costs that will be incurred for compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We also expect that if the US dollar remains volatile against the euro or other currencies, general and administrative expenses reported in US dollars could fluctuate. |
22
Real Estate Related Charges | ||||
We completed a valuation of the building located at 301 Velocity Way as part of the amended financing arrangement signed in September 2004 for that building. Under the original lease of $43.1 million, we guaranteed the lessor an 82% residual value in the building upon the termination of the original lease. The recent valuation provided a value of approximately $31.7 million for the building, and we paid $11.4 million to the lessor and recorded a one-time loss associated with the original lease in September 2004. In addition, during the quarter ended September 30, 2004, we wrote off $0.9 million of capitalized lease costs associated with the original lease and $2.1 million of capitalized costs associated with other development activity within our Foster City campus. | ||||
Amortization of Identified Intangibles and other Acquisition-related Expense | ||||
Amortization of identified intangibles and other acquisition-related expense for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was approximately $3.5 million compared to approximately $1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2003. Amortization of identified intangibles was approximately $11.5 million and approximately $5.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The increase was attributable to the amortization of identified intangibles related to the acquisitions made in late 2003 and early 2004. In-process research and development was $1.0 million for the first half of 2004 for the ADS acquisition and approximately $1.2 million for the first half of 2003 for the Best acquisition. Additional information on the intangibles and the related amortization can be found in Note 9 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. |
Interest and Other Income, net
Interest and Other Income, Net | ||||
Interest income is derived mainly from our short-term investments, net of investment fees. For the three months ended September 30, 2004 interest and other income was approximately $3.4 million, while for the three months ended September 30, 2003 it was approximately $3.1 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004 interest and other income was approximately $9.3 million, while for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 it was approximately $8.7 million. The increases were driven by higher interest rates. | ||||
Interest Expense | ||||
Interest expense for the first nine months of 2004 includes the interest expense and debt amortization costs of approximately $4.4 million related to our 1.50% senior convertible debt issued in June 2003. We had approximately $1.6 million in interest expense for the first nine months of 2003, which included approximately 4 months of interest expense and debt amortization costs for the convertible debt. | ||||
Gain on Sale of Assets | ||||
We recognized approximately $3.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 from the sale of assets related to Unimobile. | ||||
Litigation Settlement Income | ||||
The litigation settlement income of approximately $1.6 million in 2003 consisted of settlements received from litigation protection our intellectual property, net of related legal expenses. We have received $58 thousand in additional settlements in 2004, net of related legal expenses. We expect to receive additional amounts in the future, but are unable to estimate the total at this time. |
23
Income Taxes
During the third quarter of 2004, the tax provision reflects the one time effect of the resolution of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examination of our federal income tax returns filed for the years 1999 through 2001. As a result of the settlement reached with the IRS for these years, we were required to remit $0.6 million in tax deficiencies and related interest and we utilized $6.4 million in credit carry forwards available to offset income taxes payable in future periods.
In addition and as a result of such settlement, we have reversed previously accrued taxes of approximately $7.8 million related to the foreign sales corporation and research and development tax credit matters as such tax liabilities are no longer required.
Also, during the third quarter of 2004, we have evaluated the business objectives and financial requirements of our domestic and international operations and determined that we intend to permanently reinvest $29.0 million of unremitted earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries reported for the periods through 2003. Therefore, the tax provision also reflects a benefit of $11.1 million from the reversal of the previously recorded deferred tax liability associated with those earnings.
The net impact of these events for the three months ended September 30, 2004 is a net income tax benefit of $18.9 million. The effective tax rate was a benefit of 357% and a provision of 27% for the three-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Excluding the net income tax benefit of $18.9 million, our effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was a benefit of 54%.
The effective tax rate was a benefit of 52.5% and a provision of 27% for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Excluding the net income tax benefit of $18.9 million, our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was a provision of 25%.
For the 2004 year, the rate was negatively impacted due to the in-process research and development write-off related to the ADS acquisition, the expiration of the United States research and development credit on June 30, 2004, and decreased investments in tax-exempt securities. In each period, we benefited from tax-exempt interest income, research and development credits, and benefits from foreign sales in achieving a consolidated effective tax rate lower than that prescribed by the respective Federal and State taxing authorities.
On October 4, 2004, the Working Families Tax Relief Act was signed renewing the federal tax laws regarding the research and development credit. In accordance with FASB 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, the benefit of this reinstatement will be reflected in our fourth quarter tax provision.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments increased by $25.2 million to $649.3 million as of September 30, 2004, from $624.1 million as of December 31, 2003. Working capital decreased by $44.8 million to $620.4 million as of September 30, 2004, down from $665.2 million as of December 31, 2003. We invest cash in excess of our operating needs in short-term investments.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $46.6 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004. Net income of $37.2 million during 2004 was increased by $18.0 million for non-cash charges of depreciation and amortization, the write-off of in-process research and development cost, bad-debt expense, deferred compensation and gains from the sale of assets offset by losses from the retirement of assets and decreased by $12.7 million for adjustments to deferred income taxes related to an the settlement of a tax audit issue. Changes in current assets and liabilities increased cash by $4.1 million, with decreases in cash resulting from accounts receivable and income taxes payable, offset with increases in cash from, inventories, other current assets and accounts payable. Accounts payable balances increased at the end of the period as we were aggressively managing our cash balances. Inventory balances were down as we decreased our finished goods inventory and consumed raw materials that were purchased over the last several quarters. The change in income taxes payable of $2.5 million includes payments of $1.4 million, current provision of $13.8 million and adjustments related to the settlement of the IRS audit of $12.7 million.
Sales in excess of purchases of short-term investments were $11.6 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, to provide funds for our common stock repurchase program and acquisitions. In connection with the synthetic leases for our Foster City campus buildings we reduced funds held in restricted investments for an
24
increase in cash of $24.1 million. In February 2004, we acquired ADS for approximately $11.6 million, net of cash received in the transaction. In March 2004, we sold assets from our Unimobile group and received $4.1 million in proceeds. Our capital expenditures generally consist of investments in computer equipment and furniture for use in our operations. We purchased approximately $4.4 million of equipment during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, net of retirements.
Net cash used by financing activities of $30.0 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2004, was the result of $25.7 million from the exercises of common stock options and the issuance of stock under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, less $55.6 million used for the repurchase of shares of our common stock. During 2003 and 2004 our Board of Directors authorized an aggregate of $150.0 million for the repurchase of our common stock, of which $98.9 million remains available.
Inventory
Our inventory consists primarily of memory subsystems, processors and ASICs, which are sold to third-party contract manufacturers responsible for manufacturing our products. Should we decide to purchase components and do our own manufacturing, or should it become necessary for us to purchase and sell components other than the processors, ASICs or memory subsystems for our contract manufacturers, inventory balances and potentially fixed assets would increase significantly, thereby reducing our available cash resources. Further, the inventory we carry could become obsolete thereby negatively impacting our consolidated financial position and results of operations. We also rely on several sole-source suppliers for certain key components and could experience a significant negative impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations if such supplies were reduced or not available.
Purchase Commitments
We may be required and have been required in the past to compensate our sub-contract manufacturers for components purchased for orders subsequently cancelled by us. We periodically review the potential liability and the adequacy of the related reserve. Management analyzes current economic trends, changes in customer demand and acceptance of our products when evaluating the adequacy of such reserves. Significant management judgments and estimates must be made and used in connection with establishing the reserves in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our income for any period if management made different judgments or utilized different estimates. Our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively impacted if we were required to compensate the sub-contract manufacturers in an amount significantly in excess of the reserve.
Indemnifications
In the normal course of business, we provide indemnifications of varying scope to customers against claims of intellectual property infringement or others possible claims made by third parties arising from the use of our products. Historically, costs related to these indemnification provisions have not been significant and we are unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these indemnification provisions on our future results of operations.
As permitted under Delaware law, we have agreements whereby we indemnify our executive officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is, or was serving, at our request in such capacity. The indemnification period covers all pertinent events and occurrences during the officers or directors lifetime. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, we have director and officer insurance coverage that limits our exposure and enables us to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. We believe the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements in excess of applicable insurance coverage is minimal.
Legal Proceedings
Over the past several years, Mr. Jan R. Coyle, an individual living in Nevada, has repeatedly demanded that we buy technology allegedly invented by his company, Kolbet Labs. In December 2001, Mr. Coyle threatened to sue us and our customers for allegedly infringing his soon to be issued patent and for allegedly misappropriating his alleged trade secrets. We believe Mr. Coyles claims are baseless and completely without merit. Therefore, on December 11, 2001, we filed a declaratory relief action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, asking the Court to declare that we and our customers have not breached any nondisclosure agreement with Mr. Coyle or Kolbet Labs, nor have we infringed any alleged patent claims or misappropriated any alleged trade secrets belonging to Mr. Coyle or Kolbet Labs through our sale of Fiery, Splash or EDOX print controllers. We also sought an injunction enjoining both Mr. Coyle and Kolbet Labs from bringing or threatening to bring a lawsuit against us, our suppliers, vendors, customers and users of our products for breach of contract and misappropriation of trade secrets. On March 26, 2002, the Northern District of California Court dismissed our complaint citing the Courts lack of jurisdiction over
25
Mr. Coyle. We appealed the Courts dismissal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington D.C., who reversed the dismissal of our case and remanded it back to the Northern District of California Court. Mr. Coyle and Kolbet Labs subsequently moved to dismiss our complaint under the Declaratory Judgment Act. The Court granted dismissal on February 17, 2004. On February 17, 2004, we filed a second declaratory relief action in the Northern District of California against Mr. Coyle and Kolbet Labs. We appealed that ruling to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., which heard oral arguments on October 4, 2004. Their decision is pending. We are pursuing both of our cases against Mr. Coyle and Kolbet Labs.
On February 26, 2002, Mr. Coyles company, J&L Electronics, filed a complaint against us in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada alleging patent infringement, breach of non-disclosure agreements, misappropriation of trade secrets, violations of federal antitrust law and related causes of action. We denied all of the allegations and management believed this lawsuit to be without merit. On March 28, 2003, the Federal District Judge dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction over us. J&L Electronics appealed the dismissal to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. On February 9, 2004, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of J&L Electronics complaint. J&L appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court who denied his petition on January 12, 2004. Although Mr. Coyle lost both of his appeals, he has caused J&L Electronics to initiate yet another legal action, this time in Arizona.
On May 3, 2004, J&L Electronics, filed a complaint against us in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona alleging patent infringement, breach of non-disclosure agreements, misappropriation of trade secrets, violations of federal antitrust law and related causes of action. We have moved to have that legal action dismissed or transferred to California. We believe that the patent is invalid and the lawsuit is without merit and intend to defend ourselves accordingly.
On June 25, 2003, a securities class action complaint was filed against Printcafe Software, Inc., now our wholly owned subsidiary and certain of Printcafes officers in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. The complaint alleges that the defendants violated Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 due to allegedly false and misleading statements in connection with Printcafes initial public offering and subsequent press releases. We acquired Printcafe in October 2003. On June 28, 2004, an amended complaint was filed in the action adding additional Printcafe directors as defendants. We believe that the lawsuit is without merit and intend to defend ourselves accordingly.
Because of the uncertainties related to both the amount and range of loss on the pending litigation matters, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of the liability that could result from an unfavorable outcome. Pending or future litigation could be costly, could cause the diversion of our attention and could, upon resolution, have a material adverse effect on the business, results of operations financial condition and cash flow.
In addition, we are involved from time to time in litigation relating to claims arising in the normal course of our business.
Off-Balance Sheet Financing
Synthetic Lease Arrangements
We are a party to two synthetic leases (the 301 Lease and the 303 Lease, together Leases) covering our Foster City facilities located at 301 and 303 Velocity Way, Foster City, California. Both Leases expire in July 2014. We may, at our option, purchase the facilities during or at the end of the term of the leases for the amount expended by the lessor to purchase the facilities ($56.9 million for the 303 Lease and $31.7 million for the 301 Lease). We have guaranteed to the lessor a residual value associated with the buildings equal to 82% of their funding of the respective Leases. Under the financial covenants, we must maintain a minimum net worth and a minimum tangible net worth as of the end of each quarter. There is an additional covenant regarding mergers. We are in compliance with all of the covenants at the time of this filing. We are liable to the lessor for the financed amount of the buildings if we default on our covenants.
We have assessed our exposure in relation to the first loss guarantees under the Leases and believes that there is no deficiency to the guaranteed value at September 30, 2004. If there is a decline in value, we will record a loss associated with the residual value guarantee. The funds pledged under the Leases ($56.9 million for the 303 Lease
26
and $31.7 million for the 301 Lease at September 30, 2004) are in LIBOR-based interest bearing accounts and are restricted as to withdrawal at all times. In conjunction with the Leases, we have entered into separate ground leases with the lessor for approximately 30 years.
We are treated as the owner of these buildings for federal income tax purposes.
As part of the amended financing arrangement for the 301 Lease, we completed a valuation of the building located at 301 Velocity Way. Under the original financing agreement, we guaranteed the lessor upon termination of the original lease an 82% residual value in the building which cost $43.1 million to construct. The recent valuation provided a value of approximately $31.7 million, and we have recorded a one-time loss of $11.4 million associated with the original lease. In addition, we were required to write off $852 thousand of capitalized lease costs associated with the original lease.
Effective July 1, 2003, the Company has applied the accounting and disclosure rules set forth in Interpretation No. 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, as revised (FIN 46R) for variable interest entities (VIEs). The Company has evaluated its synthetic lease agreements to determine if the arrangements qualify as variable interest entities under FIN 46R. The Company determined that the synthetic lease agreements do qualify as VIEs; however, because the Company is not the primary beneficiary under FIN 46R it is not required to consolidate the VIEs in the financial statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements
Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and cash generated from operations will satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures, acquisition needs, investment requirements, stock repurchases, commitments (see Note 12 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operations through at least the next 12 months. We believe that the most strategic uses of our cash resources include acquisitions, strategic investments to gain access to new technologies, repurchase of shares of our common stock and working capital. There are no transactions, arrangements and other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons that are reasonably likely to materially affect liquidity or the availability of our requirements for capital resources.
DISCLOSURES ON STOCK OPTION PROGRAMS
Option Program Description
Our stock option program is a broad-based, long-term retention program that is intended to attract and retain talented employees and align stockholder and employee interests. We consider our option program critical to our operation and productivity and essentially all of our employees currently participate. The program consists of a broad-based plan under which options may be granted to all employees, directors, and consultants. Option vesting periods range from 2 - 4 years, with an average vesting period of 3.5 years.
Distribution and Dilutive Effect of Options
For the period ended and as of |
||||||||||||
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||||||
Employee and Executive Option Grants |
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
|||||||||
Grants during the period as % of outstanding shares |
1 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | ||||||
Grants to listed officers* during the period as % of total options granted |
0 | % | 13 | % | 9 | % | ||||||
Grants to listed officers* during the period as % of outstanding shares |
0 | % | 1 | % | 1 | % | ||||||
Cumulative options held by listed officers* as % of total options outstanding |
10 | % | 11 | % | 10 | % |
*See Executive Options for named officers; these are defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission as the Chief Executive Officer and each of the four other most highly compensated executive officers at the end of the last completed fiscal year. We currently have only three executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer. |
27
We have implemented a stock trading program for our Board of Directors, corporate executive officers and other insiders, under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. When there is no material non-public information available, Rule 10b5-1 allows corporate insiders to establish plans that permit prearranged future sales of his or her securities. Under our trading plan, corporate insiders prepare a written plan to sell shares on a prearranged basis over a set period of time. An independent broker then executes the pre-planned trades, according to the plans instructions, without regard to any subsequent non-public information the individual might receive. Once the insiders plan is in place, he or she cannot influence the brokers trading activities of our stock. Additionally, our insiders that participate in the plan are only allowed to sell our stock through the plan. Currently, the following Section 16 officers and directors are participating in our Rule 10b5-1 stock trading program: Dan Maydan, Guy Gecht, Fred Rosenzweig and Joseph Cutts.
General Option Information
Summary of Option Activity
Options Outstanding |
||||||||||||
Shares Available | ||||||||||||
for Options | Number of Shares | Weighted Average | ||||||||||
(in thousands) |
(in thousands) |
Exercise Price |
||||||||||
January 1, 2003 |
2,263 | 11,128 | $ | 21.25 | ||||||||
Authorized and assumed |
968 | 140 | 189.96 | |||||||||
Grants |
(3,269 | ) | 3,269 | 20.48 | ||||||||
Exercises |
| (2,425 | ) | 15.11 | ||||||||
Cancellations |
625 | (625 | ) | 23.61 | ||||||||
Expirations |
(199 | ) | | | ||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
388 | 11,487 | $ | 24.21 | ||||||||
Authorized and assumed |
3,923 | | ||||||||||
Grants |
(282 | ) | 282 | 25.60 | ||||||||
Exercises |
| (1,304 | ) | 15.90 | ||||||||
Cancellations |
491 | (491 | ) | 31.98 | ||||||||
Expirations |
(49 | ) | | | ||||||||
September 30, 2004 |
4,471 | 9,974 | $ | 24.95 | ||||||||
In-the-Money and Out-of-the-Money Option Information
As of September 30, 2004
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Exercise | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(Shares in thousands) |
Shares |
Price |
Shares |
Price |
Shares |
Price |
||||||||||||||||||
In-the-money |
1,366 | $ | 13.43 | 106 | $ | 14.52 | 1,472 | $ | 13.51 | |||||||||||||||
Out-of-the-money (1) |
5,633 | $ | 29.78 | 2,869 | $ | 21.35 | 8,502 | $ | 26.93 | |||||||||||||||
Total Options Outstanding |
6,999 | $ | 26.59 | 2,975 | $ | 21.10 | 9,974 | $ | 24.95 | |||||||||||||||
(1) | Out-of-the-money options are those options with an exercise price equal to or above the closing price of $16.24 at the end of the quarter. |
28
Executive Options
Aggregated Option Exercises as of September 30, 2004 and Period End Option Values
Number of | Value of Unexercised | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Unexercised Options | In-the-Money Options | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquired on |
Value | at 9/30/04 |
at 9/30/04 (2) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Name |
Exercise |
Realized(1) |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
||||||||||||||||||
Gecht |
147,250 | $ | 1,489,363 | 208,250 | 144,750 | $ | 40,463 | | ||||||||||||||||
Rosenzweig |
97,000 | $ | 1,387,550 | 332,833 | 114,167 | $ | 17,430 | | ||||||||||||||||
Cutts |
39,000 | $ | 409,500 | 87,275 | 69,575 | $ | 46,688 | |
(1) | This amount represents the market value of the underlying securities on the exercise date minus the exercise price of such options. |
(2) | This amount represents the market value of $16.24 of the underlying securities relating to in-the-money options at September 30, 2004 minus the exercise price of such options. |
Factors That Could Adversely Affect Performance
We rely on sales to a relatively small number of OEM partners and the loss of any of these customers could substantially decrease our revenues.
A significant portion of our revenues are generated by sales of our printer and copier related products to a relatively small number of OEMs. For example, Canon, Xerox and Konica Minolta each contributed over 10% of our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and together accounted for approximately 65% of those revenues. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, these same three customers each contributed over 10% of our revenues and together accounted for approximately 72% of our revenues for the year. Because sales of our printer and copier-related products constitute a significant portion of our revenues and there are a limited number of OEMs producing copiers and printers in sufficient volume to be attractive customers for us, we expect that we will continue to depend on a relatively small number of OEM customers for a significant portion of our revenues in future periods. Accordingly, if we lose or experience reduced sales to an important OEM customer, we will have difficulty replacing the revenue traditionally generated from such customer with sales to new or existing OEM customers and our revenues will likely decline significantly.
Because of our recent acquisitions we now sell some of our products directly to distributors and to the end-user. If we are unable to effectively manage a direct sales force, revenues could decline.
We have traditionally sold our products to our OEM partners, who in turn sold the product to the end-user. Accordingly, in the past, our marketing and sales efforts focused on manufacturers and distributors of the manufacturers equipment, not on the end-user of the product. Consequently, we do not have experience developing and managing a direct sales force or marketing products and services directly to the end-user. The professional printing applications and enterprise solutions that we acquired in our purchase of Printcafe and Automated Dispatch Solutions are sold directly to the end-user. If we are unable to successfully develop, expand and manage our direct sales force or develop a marketing program that effectively reaches the end-users, we are likely to see a decline in revenues from those products and the anticipated benefits of the acquisitions may be reduced or not materialize.
We do not typically have long term purchase contracts with our customers and our customers have in the past and could at any time in the future, reduce or cease purchasing products from us, harming our operating results and business.
With the exception of certain minimum purchase obligations, we typically do not have long-term volume purchase contracts with our customers, including Canon, Xerox and Konica Minolta and they are not obligated to purchase products from us. Accordingly, our customers could at any time reduce their purchases from us or cease purchasing
29
our products altogether. In the past, some of our OEM customers have elected to develop products on their own, rather than purchase our products and we expect that customers will continue to make such elections in the future. In addition, since our OEM customers incorporate our products into products they manufacture and sell, any decline in demand for copiers or laser printers and any other negative developments affecting our major customers or the computer industry in general, is likely to harm our results of operations. For example, several of our customers have in the past experienced serious financial difficulties which led to a decline in sales of our products to these customers. If any significant customers should face such difficulties in the future, our operating results could be harmed through, among other things, decreased sales volumes and write-offs of accounts receivables and inventory related to products we have manufactured for these customers products.
In addition, a significant portion of our operating expenses are fixed in advance based on projected sales levels and margins, sales forecasts from our OEM customers and product development programs. A substantial portion of our backlog is scheduled for delivery within 90 days or less and our customers may cancel orders and change volume levels or delivery times for product they have ordered from us without penalty. Accordingly, if sales to our OEM customers are below expectations in any given quarter, the adverse impact of the shortfall in revenues on operating results may be increased by our inability to adjust spending in the short term to compensate for this shortfall.
We rely on our OEM customers to develop and sell products incorporating our technologies and if they fail to successfully develop and sell these products, or curtail or cease the use of our technologies in their products, our business will be harmed.
We rely upon our OEM customers to develop new products, applications and product enhancements utilizing our technologies in a timely and cost-effective manner. Our continued success depends upon the ability of these OEM customers to utilize our technologies while meeting changing end-user customer needs and responding to emerging industry standards and other technological changes. However, we cannot assure you that our OEM customers will effectively meet these requirements. These OEM customers, who are not within our control, are generally not obligated to purchase products from us and we cannot assure you that they will continue to carry our products. For example, our OEM customers have incorporated into their products the technologies of other companies in addition to, or instead of, our technologies and will likely continue to do so in the future. If our OEM customers do not effectively market products containing our technologies, our revenue will likely be materially and adversely affected.
Our OEM customers work closely with us to develop products that are specific to each OEM customers copiers and printers. Many of the products and technologies we are developing require that we coordinate development, quality testing, marketing and other tasks with our OEM customers. We cannot control our OEM customers development efforts or the timing of these efforts and coordinating with our OEM customers may cause delays in our own product development efforts that are outside of our control. If our OEM customers delay the release of their product due to factors outside our control, our revenue and results of operations may be adversely affected. In addition, our revenue and results of operations may be adversely affected if we cannot meet our OEM customers product needs for their specific copiers and printers, as well as successfully manage the additional engineering and support effort and other risks associated with such a wide range of products.
Ongoing economic uncertainty has had and may continue to have a negative effect on our business.
The revenue growth and profitability of our business depends significantly on the overall demand for information technology products such as ours that enable printing of digital data. Delays or reductions in information technology spending, such as occurred since 2001, has and could continue to cause a decline in demand for our products and services and consequently has and may continue to harm our business, operating results, financial condition, prospects and stock price.
Our operating results may fluctuate based upon many factors, which could adversely affect our stock price.
Stock prices of high technology companies such as ours tend to be volatile and are subject to broad fluctuation, including due to variations in operating results and, consequently, fluctuations in our operating results could adversely affect our stock price. Factors that have caused our operating results and share price to fluctuate in the past and that may cause future fluctuations include:
| varying demand for our products, due to seasonality, OEM customer product development and marketing efforts, OEM customer financial and operational condition and general economic conditions; |
30
| shifts in customer demand to lower cost products; |
| success and timing of new product introductions by us and our OEM customers and the performance of our products generally; |
| volatility in foreign exchange rates, changes in interest rates and availability of bank or financing credit to consumers of digital copiers and printers; |
| price reductions by us and our competitors, which may be exacerbated by competitive pressures caused by economic conditions generally; |
| delay, cancellation or rescheduling of orders or projects; |
| availability of key components, including possible delays in deliveries from suppliers, the performance of third-party manufacturers and the status of our relationships with our key suppliers; |
| potential excess or shortage of employees and location of research and development centers; |
| changes in our product mix such as shifts from higher revenue products to lower revenue products dependant on higher sales volumes; |
| costs associated with complying with any applicable governmental regulations, including substantial costs related to compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; |
| acquisitions and integration of new businesses; |
| changes in our business model related to the migration of embedded products to a design-licensed model; |
| costs related to the entry into new markets, such as commercial printing and office equipment service automation; |
| general economic conditions; and |
| other risks described herein. |
We face competition from other suppliers as well as our own OEM customers and if we are not able to compete successfully our business may be harmed.
Our industry is highly competitive and is characterized by rapid technological changes. We compete against a number of other suppliers of imaging products and technologies, including our OEM customers themselves. Although we attempt to develop and support innovative products that end customers demand, products or technologies developed by competing suppliers, including our own OEM customers, could render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive.
While many of our OEM customers incorporate our technologies into their end products on an exclusive basis, we do not have any formal agreements that prevent these OEM customers from offering alternative products that do not incorporate our technologies. If, as has occurred in the past, an OEM customer offers products from alternative suppliers instead of, or in addition to products incorporating our technologies, our market share could decrease, which would likely reduce our revenue and adversely affect our financial results.
In addition, many OEMs in the printer and copier industry, including most of our OEM customers, internally develop and sell products that compete directly with our current products. These OEMs have significant investments in their existing solutions and have substantial resources that may enable them to develop or improve, more quickly than us, technologies similar to ours that are compatible with their own products. Our OEM customers have in the past marketed and likely will continue in the future to market, their own internal technologies and solutions in addition to ours, even when their technologies and solutions are less advanced, have lower performance or cost more than our products. Given the significant financial, marketing and other resources of our larger OEM customers and other significant OEMs in the imaging industry who are not our customers, we may not be able to successfully compete against similar products developed internally by these OEMs, particularly in the black-and-white and embedded color
31
product markets where price competition is most intense and profit margins are low. If we cannot compete successfully against the OEMs internally developed products, we will lose sales and market share in those areas where the OEMs choose to compete and our business will be harmed.
Demand for technology, in general, and for products containing our technology that enable black-and-white and color printing of digital data has decreased over the past three years and could decrease in the future, adversely affecting our sales revenue.
Our products are primarily targeted at enabling the printing of black and white and color digital data. Demand for networked printers and copiers containing our technology decreased from 2001 through 2003 due to the global economic downturn. If demand for digital printing products and services containing our technology were to continue to decline, or if the demand for our OEM customers specific printers or copiers for which our products are designed were to continue to decline, our revenue would likely decrease. Our products are combined with products, such as digital printers and copiers, which are large capital expenditures as well as discretionary purchase items for the end customer. In difficult economic times such as we have recently experienced, spending on information technology typically decreases. As the products in which our products are incorporated are of a more discretionary nature than many other technology products, we may be more adversely impacted by deteriorating general economic conditions than other technology firms outside of our market. The decrease in demand for our products has harmed and could, in the future, continue to harm our results of operations and we do not know whether demand for our products or our customers products will increase or improve from current levels.
If we are not able to hire and retain skilled employees, we may not be able to develop products or meet demand for our products in a timely fashion.
We depend upon skilled employees, such as software and hardware engineers, quality assurance engineers and other technical professionals with specialized skills. We are headquartered in the Silicon Valley where competition has historically been intense among companies to hire engineering and technical professionals. In times of professional labor imbalances, it has in the past and is likely in the future to be difficult for us to locate and hire qualified engineers and technical professionals and for us to retain these people. There are many technology companies located near our corporate offices in the Silicon Valley that may try to hire our employees. The movement of our stock price may also impact our ability to hire and retain employees. If we do not offer competitive compensation, we may not be able to recruit or retain employees. We offer a broad-based equity compensation plan based on granting options from stockholder-approved plans in order to be competitive in the labor market. If stockholders do not approve additional shares for these plans or new plans for future grants when necessary to enable us to offer compensation competitive with those offered by other companies seeking the same employees, it may be difficult for us to hire and retain skilled employees. If we cannot successfully hire and retain employees, we may not be able to develop products or to meet demand for our products in a timely fashion and our results of operations may be harmed.
Recent and proposed regulations related to equity incentives could adversely affect our ability to attract and retain key personnel.
Since our inception, we have used stock options and other long-term equity incentives as a fundamental component of our employee retention packages. We believe that stock options and other long-term equity incentives directly motivate our employees to maximize long-term stockholder value and, through the use of vesting, encourage employees to remain with our company. The Financial Accounting Standards Board has announced changes to US GAAP that, if implemented, would require us to record a charge to earnings for employee stock option grants and issuances of stock under employee stock purchase plans, or ESPPs. This pending regulation would negatively impact our GAAP earnings. For example, recording a charge for employee stock options under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation would have reduced net income by $17.9 million, $21.8 million and $18.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Our net income would have been reduced by $3.8 million and $13.6 million for the quarter and the nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, for stock option grants and issuances of stock under our ESPP, net of the tax effect, under the pending regulation. In addition, new regulations implemented by The Nasdaq National Market requiring shareholder approval for all stock option plans could make it more difficult for us to grant options to employees in the future. To the extent that new regulations make it more difficult or expensive to grant options to employees, we may incur increased costs, change our equity incentive strategy or find it difficult to attract, retain and motivate employees, each of which could materially and adversely affect our business.
32
If we are unable to develop new products, or execute product introductions on a timely basis, our future revenue and operating results may be harmed.
Our operating results depend to a significant extent on continual improvement of our existing products and technologies and rapid innovation of new products and technologies by us. Our success depends not only on our ability to predict future requirements, but also to successfully develop and introduce new products that address end customer needs or add additional functionality that end customers will demand. Any delays in the launch or availability of new products we are planning which has occurred in the current year could harm our financial results. During transitions from existing products to new products, customers may delay or cancel orders for existing products. Our results of operations may be harmed if we cannot successfully manage product transitions or provide adequate availability of products after they have been introduced.
We must continue to make significant investments in research and development in order to enhance performance and functionality of our products, including product lines different than our Fiery, Splash, MicroPress and EDOX servers and embedded controllers. We cannot assure you that we will successfully identify new product opportunities, develop and introduce new products to market in a timely manner, or achieve market acceptance of our products. Also, when we decide to develop new products, our research and development expenses generally increase in the short term without a corresponding increase in revenue, which can harm our operating results. Finally, we cannot assure you that products and technologies developed by our own customers and others will not render our products or technologies obsolete or noncompetitive.
If we enter new markets or distribution channels this could result in higher operating expenses that may not be offset by increased revenue.
We continue to explore opportunities to develop product lines different from our current servers and embedded controllers, such as the proofing and print management software, document scanning solutions, mobile printing products, prepress software solutions and web submission tools, among others. We expect to continue to invest funds to develop new distribution and marketing channels for these and additional new products and services, which will increase our operating expenses. We do not know if we will be successful in developing these channels or whether the market will accept any of our new products or services or if we will generate sufficient revenues from these activities to offset the additional operating expenses we incur. In addition, even if we are able to introduce new products or services, if customers do not accept these new products or services or if we are not able to price such products or services competitively, our operating results will likely suffer.
We license software used in most of our products from Adobe Systems Incorporated and the loss of this license would prevent us from shipping these products.
Most of our current products include software that we must license from Adobe. Specifically, we are required to obtain separate licenses from Adobe for the right to use Adobe PostScript® software in each type of copier or printer used with a Fiery Server or Controller. Although to date we have successfully obtained licenses to use Adobes PostScript® software when required, Adobe is not required to and we cannot be certain that Adobe will, grant future licenses to Adobe PostScript® software on reasonable terms, in a timely manner, or at all. In addition, in order to obtain licenses from Adobe, Adobe requires that we obtain from them quality assurance approvals for our products that use Adobe software. Although to date we have successfully obtained such quality assurances from Adobe, we cannot be certain Adobe will grant us such approvals in the future. If Adobe does not grant us such licenses or approvals, if the Adobe licenses are terminated, or if our relationship with Adobe is otherwise materially impaired, we would likely be unable to sell products that incorporate Adobe PostScript® software and our financial condition and results of operations would be significantly harmed. In some products we have introduced substitute software developed internally that does not require any license from Adobe. The costs to continue to develop software internally could increase our research and development expenditures and we may not be able to recapture those costs through increased sales. While we plan on expanding the number of products using internally developed software, there can be no assurance that these products will be accepted in the market.
We depend upon a limited group of suppliers for key components in our products and the loss of any of these suppliers could adversely affect our business.
Certain components necessary for the manufacture of our products are obtained from a sole supplier or a limited group of suppliers. These include processors from Intel and other related semiconductor components. We do not maintain long-term agreements with any of our component suppliers and conduct our business with such suppliers
33
solely on a purchase order basis. Because the purchase of certain key components involves long lead times, in the event of unanticipated volatility in demand for our products, we have been in the past and may in the future be unable to manufacture certain products in a quantity sufficient to meet end user demand. Similarly, as has occurred in the past, in the event that anticipated demand does not materialize, we may hold excess quantities of inventory that could become obsolete. In order to meet projected demand, we maintain an inventory of components for which we are dependent upon sole or limited source suppliers and components with prices that fluctuate significantly. As a result, we are subject to a risk of inventory obsolescence, which could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. Additionally, the market prices and availability of certain components, particularly memory and Intel designed components, which collectively represent a substantial portion of the total manufactured cost of our products, have fluctuated significantly in the past. Such fluctuations in the future could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition including a reduction in gross margins.
We are dependent on a limited number of subcontractors, with whom we do not have long-term contracts, to manufacture and deliver products to our customers and the loss of any of these subcontractors could adversely affect our business.
We subcontract with other companies to manufacture our products and we do not have long-term agreements with these subcontractors. We rely on the ability of our subcontractors to produce products to be sold to our customers and while we closely monitor our subcontractors performance we cannot assure you that such subcontractors will continue to manufacture our products in a timely and effective manner. The weakened economy has led to the dissolution, bankruptcy or consolidation of some of the subcontractors who are able to manufacture our products, decreasing the available number of subcontractors. If the available number of subcontractors continues to decrease, it is possible that we will not be able to secure appropriate subcontractors to fulfill our demand in a timely manner or at all, particularly if demand for our products increases, or if we lose one or more of our current subcontractors. Fewer subcontractors may also reduce our negotiating leverage regarding product costs. Difficulties experienced by our subcontractors, including financial problems and the inability to make or ship our products or fix quality assurance problems, could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. If we decide to change subcontractors, we could experience delays in setting up new subcontractors which would result in delay in delivery of our products and potentially the cancellation of orders for our products. A high concentration of our products is manufactured at a single subcontractor location, Sanmina-SCI in Colorado. Should Sanmina-SCI experience any inability to manufacture or deliver product from this location our business, financial condition and operations could be harmed. Since we do not maintain long-term agreements with our subcontractors, any of our subcontractors could enter into agreements with our competitors that might restrict or prohibit such subcontractors from manufacturing our products or could otherwise lead to an inability of such subcontractor from filling our orders in a timely manner. In such event, we may not be able to find suitable replacement subcontractors and our business, financial condition and operations would likely be harmed.
Seasonal purchasing patterns of our OEM customers have historically caused lower fourth and first quarter revenue from sales of our servers and embedded products, which may negatively impact our results of operations.
Our results of operations have typically followed a seasonal pattern reflecting the buying patterns of our large OEM customers. In the fiscal quarter completed December 31, 2003 and in past fiscal fourth quarters (the quarter ending December 31) our results have been adversely affected because some or all of our OEM customers decrease, or otherwise delay, fourth quarter orders. Over the past several years our OEM customers have lowered channel inventories throughout the year, causing this effect to shift more from the fourth quarter into the first quarter, when our OEM customers typically have lower sales of their own products. In addition, the first fiscal quarter traditionally has been a weaker quarter because our OEM customers focus on training their sales forces and have reduced sales to their customers. The primary reasons for these seasonal patterns are:
| our OEM customers have historically sought to minimize year-end inventory investment (including the reduction in demand following introductory channel fill purchases); |
| the timing of new product releases and training by our OEM customers in the first and fourth quarters; and |
| certain of our OEM customers typically achieve their yearly sales targets before year end and consequently delay further purchases into the next fiscal year (we do not know when our customers reach these sales targets as they generally do not disclose them to us). |
34
As a result of these factors, we believe that period to period comparisons of our operating results are not meaningful and you should not rely on such comparisons to predict our future performance. We anticipate that future operating results may fluctuate significantly due to the continuation or changes in this seasonal demand pattern.
We may make acquisitions that are dilutive to existing stockholders, result in unanticipated accounting charges or otherwise adversely affect our results of operations and result in difficulties in assimilating and integrating the operations, personnel, technologies, products and information systems of acquired companies or businesses.
We seek to develop new technologies and products from both internal and external sources. As part of this effort, we have in the past made, and will likely continue to make, acquisitions of other companies or other companies assets. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, such as:
| if we issue equity securities in connection with an acquisition, the issuance will generally be dilutive to our existing stockholders, alternatively, acquisitions made entirely or partially for cash will reduce our cash reserves; |
| difficulties in integration of operations, employees, technologies, or products and the related diversion of management time and effort to accomplish successful integration; |
| risks of entering markets in which we have little or no prior experience, or entering markets where competitors have stronger market positions; |
| possible write-downs of impaired assets; |
| potential loss of key employees of the acquired company; |
| possible expense overruns; |
| an adverse reaction by customers, suppliers or partners of the acquired company or EFI; |
| the risk of changes in ratings by stock analysts; |
| potential litigation surrounding transactions; |
| the inability to protect or secure technology rights; and |
| an increase in operating costs. |
Mergers and acquisitions of companies are inherently risky and we cannot assure you that our previous or future acquisitions will be successful or will not harm our business, operating results, financial condition, or stock price.
We face risks from our international operations and from currency fluctuations.
Approximately 45% and 51% of our revenue from the sale of products for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, came from sales outside North America, primarily to Europe and Japan. Approximately 49% of our revenue from the sale of products for the 2003 fiscal year came from sales outside North America, primarily to Europe and Japan. We expect that sales outside North America will continue to represent a significant portion of our total revenue. We are subject to certain risks because of our international operations. These risks include the regulatory requirements of foreign governments which may apply to our products, as well as requirements for export licenses which may be required for the export of certain technologies. The necessary export licenses may be delayed or difficult to obtain, which could cause a delay in our international sales and hurt our product revenue. Other risks include trade protection measures, natural disasters and political or economic conditions in a specific country or region.
Given the significance of our non-US sales to our total product revenue, we face a continuing risk from the fluctuation of the US dollar versus the Japanese yen, the euro and other major European currencies and numerous Southeast Asian currencies. We typically invoice our customers in US dollars and this may result in our products becoming more expensive in the local currency of our customers, thereby reducing our ability to sell our products. When we do invoice our customers in local currencies, our cash flows and earnings are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates and
35
foreign currency exchange rates between the currency of the invoice and the U.S. dollar. In January 2003, we acquired Best GmbH, whose sales are principally denominated in the euro. Sales from this subsidiary increase our exposure to currency fluctuations. In addition, we have a substantial number of international employees which creates material operating costs denominated in foreign currencies. In Europe, where we have a significant presence, our sales and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses have risen in part due to the weakened US dollar. We have attempted to limit or hedge these exposures through operational strategies where we consider it appropriate. Our efforts to reduce the risk from our international operations and from fluctuations in foreign currencies or interest rates may not be successful, which could harm our financial condition and operating results.
We may be unable to adequately protect our proprietary information and may incur expenses to defend our proprietary information.
We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark and trade secret protection, nondisclosure agreements and licensing and cross-licensing arrangements to establish, maintain and protect our intellectual property rights, all of which afford only limited protection. We have patents and pending patent applications in the United States and in various foreign countries. There can be no assurance that patents will issue from our pending applications or from any future applications, or that, if issued, any claims allowed will be sufficiently broad to protect our technology. Any failure to adequately protect our proprietary information could harm our financial condition and operating results. We cannot be certain that any patents that have been or may in the future be issued to us, or which we license from third parties, or any other of our proprietary rights will not be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. In addition, we cannot be certain that any rights granted to us under any patents, licenses or other proprietary rights will provide adequate protection of our proprietary information.
Litigation has been and may continue to be necessary to defend and enforce our proprietary rights. Such litigation, whether or not concluded successfully for us, could involve significant expense and the diversion of our attention and other resources, which could harm our financial condition and operating results.
We face risks from third party claims of infringement and potential litigation.
Third parties have claimed in the past and may claim in the future that our products infringe, or may infringe, their proprietary rights. Such claims have in the past resulted in lengthy and expensive litigation and could do so in the future. Such claims and any related litigation, whether or not we are successful in the litigation, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our resources, which could harm our financial condition and operating results. Although we may seek licenses from third parties covering intellectual property that we are allegedly infringing, we cannot assure you that any such licenses could be obtained on acceptable terms, if at all.
Our products may contain defects which are not discovered until after shipping.
Our products consist of hardware and software developed by ourselves and others. Our products may contain undetected errors and we have in the past discovered software and hardware errors in certain of our products after their introduction, resulting in warranty expense and other expenses incurred in connection with rectifying such errors. Errors could be found in new versions of our products after commencement of commercial shipments, and any such errors could result in a loss or delay in market acceptance of such products and thus harm our reputation and revenues. In addition, errors in our products (including errors in licensed third party software) detected prior to new product releases could result in delays in the introduction of new products and our incurring additional expense, which could harm our operating results.
Actual or perceived security vulnerabilities in our products could adversely affect our revenues.
Maintaining the security of our software and hardware products is an issue of critical importance to our customers and for us. There are individuals and groups who develop and deploy viruses, worms and other malicious software programs that could attack our products. Although we take preventative measures to protect our products, and we have a response team that is notified of high-risk malicious events, these procedures may not be sufficient to mitigate damage to our products. Actual or perceived security vulnerabilities in our products could lead some customers to seek to return products, to reduce or delay future purchases or to purchase competitive products. Customers may also increase their expenditures on protecting their computer systems from attack, which could delay purchases of our products. Any of these actions by customers could adversely affect our revenues.
System failures or system unavailability could harm our business.
36
We rely on our network infrastructure, internal technology systems and our internal and external websites for our development, marketing, operational, support and sales activities. Our hardware and software systems related to such activities are subject to damage from malicious code released into the public Internet through recently discovered vulnerabilities in popular software programs. These systems are also subject to acts of vandalism and to potential disruption by actions or inactions of third parties. Any event that causes failures or interruption in our hardware or software systems could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.
The location and concentration of our facilities subjects us to the risk of earthquakes, floods or other natural disasters and public health risks.
Our corporate headquarters, including most of our research and development facilities and manufacturing operations, are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, an area known for seismic activity. This area has also experienced flooding in the past. In addition, many of the components necessary to supply our products are purchased from suppliers based in areas including the San Francisco Bay Area, Taiwan and Japan and are therefore subject to risk from natural disasters. A significant natural disaster, such as an earthquake, flood or typhoon, could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.
Our employees, suppliers and customers are located worldwide. We face the risk that our employees, suppliers, or customers, either through travel or contact with other individuals, could become exposed to contagious diseases such as severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS. In addition, governments in those regions have from time-to-time imposed quarantines and taken other actions in response to contagious diseases that could affect our operations. If a significant number of employees, suppliers, or customers were unable to fulfill their obligations, due to contagious diseases, actions taken in response to contagious diseases, or other reasons, our business, financial condition and operating results could be harmed.
The value of our investment portfolio will decrease if interest rates increase.
We have an investment portfolio of mainly fixed income securities classified as available-for-sale securities. As a result, our investment portfolio is subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. We attempt to limit this exposure to interest rate risk by investing in securities with maturities of less than three years; however, we may be unable to successfully limit our risk to interest rate fluctuations and this may cause our investment portfolio to decrease in value.
Our stock price has been volatile historically and may continue to be volatile.
The market price for our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile. For example, during the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2004, the price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market ranged from a low of $16.06 to a high of $28.38. We expect our stock price to be subject to fluctuations as a result of a variety of factors, including factors beyond our control. These factors include:
| actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly operating results; |
| announcements of technological innovations or new products or services by us or our competitors; |
| announcements relating to strategic relationships, acquisitions or investments; | |||
| changes in financial estimates or other statements by securities analysts; |
| changes in general economic conditions; |
| terrorist attacks and the effects of military engagements; |
| changes in the rating of our debentures or other securities; and |
| changes in the economic performance and/or market valuations of other software and high-technology companies. |
37
Because of this volatility, we may fail to meet the expectations of our stockholders or of securities analysts from time-to-time and the trading prices of our securities could decline as a result. In addition, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected the trading prices of equity securities of many high-technology companies. These fluctuations have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. Any negative change in the publics perception of high-technology companies could depress our stock price regardless of our operating results.
Our stock repurchase program could affect our stock price and add volatility.
Any repurchases pursuant to our stock repurchase program could affect our stock price and add volatility. There can be no assurance that the repurchases will be made at the best possible price. The existence of a stock repurchase program could also cause our stock price to be higher than it would be in the absence of such a program and could potentially reduce the market liquidity for our stock. Additionally, we are permitted and could discontinue our stock repurchase program at any time and any such discontinuation could cause the market price of our stock to decline.
Under new regulations required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, an adverse opinion on internal controls could be issued by our auditors, and this could have a negative impact on our stock price.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that we establish and maintain an adequate internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting and assess on an on-going basis the design and operating effectiveness of our internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting. Our auditors are required to attest audit both the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls and managements assessment of the design and the effectiveness of its internal controls. Although no known material weaknesses exist at this time, this will be the first year that we have undergone an audit of our internal controls and procedures, and it is possible that material weaknesses could be found. If we are unable to remediate the weaknesses, the auditors would be required to issue an adverse opinion on our internal controls.
Because opinions on internal controls have not been required in the past, it is uncertain what impact an adverse opinion would have upon our stock price.
Our debt service obligations may adversely affect our cash flow.
In June 2003, we issued $240.0 million in 1.50% convertible senior debentures due in 2023. During the period the debentures are outstanding, we will have debt service obligations on the debentures of approximately $3.6 million per year in interest payments, payable semi-annually. In addition, beginning June 1, 2008, we could be required to pay contingent interest of 0.35% if during any six-month period from June 1 to November 30 and December 1 to May 31, the average market price of the debentures for the five trading days ending on the third trading day immediately preceding the first day of the relevant six-month period equals 120% or more of the principal amount of the debentures.
Our debt service obligations related to the debentures include the following redemption and repurchase terms that could also affect our cash position:
| On or after June 1, 2008, we may redeem the debentures for cash at any time as a whole, or from time to time in part, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the debenture to be redeemed plus any accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent interest, if any; | |||
| On June 1, 2008 a holder may require us to repurchase all or a portion of that holders debentures at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of those debentures plus accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent interest, if any, to, but not including, the date of repurchase in cash; and |
| A holder may require us to repurchase all or a portion of that holders debentures if a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture, occurs prior to June 1, 2008 at 100% of their principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent interest, if any to, but not including, the repurchase date. We may choose to pay the repurchase price in cash. |
38
If we issue other debt securities in the future, our debt service obligations will increase. We intend to fulfill our debt service obligations from cash generated by our operations, if any and from our existing cash and investments. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash to meet these obligations and must instead use our existing cash or investments, we may have to reduce, curtail or terminate other activities of our business. We may add lines of credit and obtain other long-term debt and mortgage financing to finance capital expenditures in the future.
Our indebtedness could have significant negative consequences. For example, it could:
| increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, as we are required to make interest payments and maintain compliance with financial covenants contained in the debentures regardless of such external conditions; | |||
| limit our ability to obtain additional financing due to covenants contained in the debentures and the existing leverage evidenced by the debentures; | |||
| require the dedication of a substantial portion of any cash flow from operations to the payment of principal of and interest on, our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of such cash flow to fund our growth strategy, working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes; | |||
| limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry by restricting the funds available for use in addressing such changes; and | |||
| place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our competitors with less debt. |
Our senior debentures issued in June 2003 are convertible into common stock under certain conditions. If either we or the debt holders convert the debentures into common stock or are required to calculate earnings per share on an as converted basis, our earnings per share could decrease.
In June 2003, we issued $240.0 million in 1.50% senior convertible debentures due in 2023. The debentures are convertible into our shares of common stock at an initial conversion rate of 37.8508 shares per $1,000 principal amount of debentures (which represents a conversion price of approximately $26.42 per share) under certain conditions and subject to certain adjustments. Holders may convert their debentures into shares of our common stock prior to 2023 under the following circumstances:
| during any fiscal quarter after September 30, 2003, if the sale price of our common stock for at least 20 consecutive trading days in the 30 consecutive trading-day period ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter exceeds 120% of the conversion price on that 30th trading day; |
| during any five consecutive trading day period immediately following any five consecutive trading day period (the Debenture Measurement Period) in which the average trading price for the debentures during that Debenture Measurement Period was less than 97% of the average conversion value for the debentures during such period; however, the debentures may not be converted after June 1, 2018 if on any trading day during such Debenture Measurement Period the closing sale price of shares of our common stock was between the then current conversion price on the debentures and 120% of the then conversion price of the debentures; |
| upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions, as defined in the indenture; or |
| if we have called the debentures for redemption. |
On June 1, 2013 and 2018, a holder may require us to repurchase all or a portion of that holders debentures at a repurchase price equal to 100% of the principal amount of those debentures plus accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent interest, if any. We may choose to pay the repurchase price on those dates in cash, in shares of our common stock or a combination of cash and shares of our common stock.
A holder may require us to repurchase all or a portion of that holders debentures if a fundamental change, as defined in the indenture, occurs prior to June 1, 2008 at 100% of their principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest, including contingent interest, if any. We may choose to pay the repurchase price in cash, shares of our common stock, or if we have been acquired by another company and we are not the surviving corporation, shares of common stock, ordinary shares or American Depositary Shares of the surviving corporation, or a combination of cash and stock.
The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) reached a consensus on Issue No. 04-8, The Effect of Contingently Convertible Debt on Diluted Earnings per Share at its September 29-30, 2004 meeting. The effective date has not been finalized but is expected to be for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2004. Under EITF Issue No. 04-8, net earnings and diluted shares outstanding, used for earnings per share calculations, would be restated using the if-converted method of accounting to reflect the contingent issuance of
39
9,084,192 shares. See Note 2 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market Risk
We are exposed to various market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as foreign currency exchange and interest rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. We may enter into financial instrument contracts to manage and reduce the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The counterparties to such contracts are major financial institutions. We had no forward foreign exchange contracts outstanding as of September 30, 2004.
Interest Rate Risk
We maintain an investment portfolio of various holdings, types, and maturities. These securities are generally classified as available for sale and consequently, are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). At any time, a sharp rise in interest rates could have a material adverse impact on the fair value of our investment portfolio. Conversely, declines in interest rates could have a material impact on interest earnings for our portfolio. We do not currently hedge these interest rate exposures.
The following table presents the hypothetical change in fair values in the financial instruments we held at September 30, 2004 that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. The modeling technique used measures the change in fair values arising from selected potential changes in interest rates. Market changes reflect immediate hypothetical parallel shifts in the yield curve of plus or minus 100 basis points (BPS) over a twelve-month time horizon.
This table estimates the fair value of the portfolio at a twelve month time horizon:
Valuation of securities | Valuation of securities | |||||||||||
given an interest rate | given an interest rate | |||||||||||
decrease of 100 basis | No change in | increase of 100 basis | ||||||||||
(in thousands) |
points |
interest rates |
points |
|||||||||
Total Fair Market
Value |
$ | 557,268 | $ | 555,970 | $ | 554,632 | ||||||
The fair value of our long-term debt, including current maturities, was estimated to be $228.2 million as of September 30, 2004.
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) | As of the end of the quarter ended September 30, 2004, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2004 to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
40
(b) | During 2004, there were no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, such controls. |
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The information set forth under Note 10 in the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
(c) Purchases of Equity Securities
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(c) Total Number of | (d) Approximate Dollar | |||||||||||||||
(a) Total | Shares Purchased | Value of Shares that May | ||||||||||||||
Number of | (b) Average | as Part of Publicly | Yet Be Purchased Under | |||||||||||||
Shares | Price Paid | Announced Plans or | the Plans or Programs (1), | |||||||||||||
Period |
Purchased |
per Share |
Programs |
(2) |
||||||||||||
July 1-31, 2004 |
740,610 | $ | 20.4153 | 740,610 | $ | 14,928 | ||||||||||
August 1-31, 2004 |
53,800 | $ | 20.0280 | 53,800 | $ | 98,937,404 | ||||||||||
September 1-30, 2004 |
| | | $ | 98,937,404 | |||||||||||
Total |
794,410 | $ | 20.3891 | 794,410 | $ | 98,937,404 | ||||||||||
(1) | On November 18, 2003 we announced that our Board of Directors had approved $50.0 million for the repurchase of our outstanding common stock during the next twelve months and we began repurchasing shares under this program in January 2004. This program was closed in August 2004 with a total of 2,096,012 shares repurchased. |
(2) | On August 26, 2004 we announced that our Board of Directors had approved $100.0 million for the repurchase of our outstanding common stock during the next twelve months. We began repurchasing shares under this program in August 2004 and as of September 30, 2004 we had repurchased 53,061 shares. Our buy back program is limited by SEC regulations and by trading windows set by Company policy. |
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) Exhibits
41
No. |
Description |
|
2.1
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 30, 2000, by and among the Company, Vancouver Acquisition Corp. and Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. (6) | |
2.2
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of October 19, 2000, to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 30, 2000, by and among the Company, Vancouver Acquisition Corp. and Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. (7) | |
2.3
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of July 14, 1999, among the Company, Redwood Acquisition Corp. and Management Graphics, Inc. (4) | |
2.4
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 26, 2003 by and among the Company, Strategic Value Engineering, Inc. and Printcafe Software, Inc. (15) | |
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (2) | |
3.2
|
Bylaws as amended (1) | |
4.2
|
Specimen Common Stock certificate of the Company (1) | |
4.3
|
Indenture dated as of June 4, 2003 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to convertible senior debentures due 2023 (8) | |
4.4
|
Form of Convertible Senior Debenture due 2023 (Exhibit A to Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.3 above) (8) | |
4.5
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2003, among the Company, UBS Warburg LLC, C.E. Unterberg Towbin and Morgan Stanley Incorporated (8) | |
10.1+
|
Agreement dated December 6, 2000, by and between Adobe Systems Incorporated and the Company (5) | |
10.2
|
1990 Stock Plan of the Company (1) | |
10.3
|
Management Graphics, Inc. 1985 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (17) | |
10.4
|
The 1999 Equity Incentive Plan as amended (3) | |
10.5
|
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan as amended (3) | |
10.7
|
Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan as amended to date (13) | |
10.8
|
Prographics, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (10) | |
10.9
|
Printcafe Software, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (10) | |
10.10
|
Printcafe Software, Inc. 2002 Key Executive Stock Incentive Plan (10) | |
10.11
|
Printcafe Software, Inc. 2002 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (10) | |
10.12
|
T/R Systems, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (11) | |
10.13
|
Electronics for Imaging, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (12) | |
10.14
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (1) | |
10.15
|
Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2003, by and between Fred Rosenzweig and the Company (9) | |
10.16
|
Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2003, by and between Joseph Cutts and the Company (9) | |
10.17
|
Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2003, by and between Guy Gecht and the Company (9) | |
10.18
|
Lease Financing of Properties Located in Foster City, California, dated as of July 16, 2004, among the Company, Société Générale Financial Corporation and Société Générale (14) | |
10.19
|
Lease Financing of Properties Located in Foster City, California, dated as of September 30, 2004, among the Company, Société Générale Financial Corporation and Société Générale (16) | |
24.1
|
Power of Attorney (see signature page) | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
42
No. |
Description |
|
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
+
|
The Company has received confidential treatment with respect to portions of these documents. | |
(1)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-50966) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(2)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-57382) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(3)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 on June 24, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(4)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Report of Unscheduled Events on Form 8-K on September 8, 1999 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(5)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(6)
|
Filed as exhibit (d) (1) to the Companys Schedule TO-T on September 14, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(7)
|
Filed as exhibit (d) (5) to the Companys TO/A Number 3 on October 20, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(8)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(9)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(10)
|
Filed as an exhibit to Printcafe Software, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-82646) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(11)
|
Filed as an exhibit to T/R Systems, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-82646) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(12)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 on June 16, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(13)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(14)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(15)
|
Filed as exhibit 10 to Amendment No. 2 to the Schedule 13D filed on February 26, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(16)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 8-K filed on October 6, 2004 (File No. 000-18805 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(17)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
On July 21, 2004, EFI filed a report on Form 8-K dated July 21, 2004 reporting under Item 12 that on July 21, 2004, EFI issued a press release regarding its financial results for its first fiscal quarter of 2004 ended June 30, 2004. The press release was furnished (not filed) as an exhibit to the report.
On August 26, 2004, EFI filed a report on Form 8-K dated August 26, 2004 reporting under Item 8.01 that on August 26, 2004, Electronics for Imaging, Inc. announced that the Companys board of directors approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which up to $100 million of the companys common stock may be repurchased. The press release was furnished (not filed) as an exhibit to the report.
On September 3, 2004, EFI filed a report on Form 8-K dated September 3, 2004 reporting under Item 2.02 that on September 3, 2004, Electronics for Imaging, Inc. issued a press release and held a conference call regarding the Companys business outlook for the second half of 2004. The press release was furnished (not filed) as an exhibit to the report.
43
On September 17, 2004, EFI filed a report on Form 8-K dated September 17, 2004 reporting under Item 8.01 additional information regarding its stock repurchase program and the dates the Company regards as blacked out for trading purposes.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ELECTRONICS FOR IMAGING, INC. | ||||
Date: November 8, 2004
|
/s/ Guy Gecht | |||
Guy Gecht | ||||
Chief Executive Officer | ||||
(Principal Executive Officer) | ||||
/s/ Joseph Cutts | ||||
Date: November 8, 2004
|
Joseph Cutts | |||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT INDEX*
No. | Description | |
(b) Exhibits |
No. |
Description |
|
2.1
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 30, 2000, by and among the Company, Vancouver Acquisition Corp. and Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. (6) | |
2.2
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of October 19, 2000, to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 30, 2000, by and among the Company, Vancouver Acquisition Corp. and Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. (7) | |
2.5
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of July 14, 1999, among the Company, Redwood Acquisition Corp. and Management Graphics, Inc. (4) | |
2.6
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 26, 2003 by and among the Company, Strategic Value Engineering, Inc. and Printcafe Software, Inc. (15) | |
3.1
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (2) | |
3.2
|
Bylaws as amended (1) | |
4.2
|
Specimen Common Stock certificate of the Company (1) | |
4.3
|
Indenture dated as of June 4, 2003 between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating to convertible senior debentures due 2023 (8) | |
4.4
|
Form of Convertible Senior Debenture due 2023 (Exhibit A to Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.3 above) (8) | |
4.5
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 4, 2003, among the Company, UBS Warburg LLC, C.E. Unterberg Towbin and Morgan Stanley Incorporated (8) | |
10.1+
|
Agreement dated December 6, 2000, by and between Adobe Systems Incorporated and the Company (5) |
44
No. |
Description |
|
10.2
|
1990 Stock Plan of the Company (1) | |
10.3
|
Management Graphics, Inc. 1985 Nonqualified Stock Option Plan (17) | |
10.4
|
The 1999 Equity Incentive Plan as amended (3) | |
10.5
|
2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan as amended (3) | |
10.7
|
Splash Technology Holdings, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan as amended to date (13) | |
10.8
|
Prographics, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (10) | |
10.9
|
Printcafe Software, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (10) | |
10.10
|
Printcafe Software, Inc. 2002 Key Executive Stock Incentive Plan (10) | |
10.11
|
Printcafe Software, Inc. 2002 Employee Stock Incentive Plan (10) | |
10.12
|
T/R Systems, Inc. 1999 Stock Option Plan (11) | |
10.13
|
Electronics for Imaging, Inc. 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (12) | |
10.14
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (1) | |
10.15
|
Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2003, by and between Fred Rosenzweig and the Company (9) | |
10.16
|
Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2003, by and between Joseph Cutts and the Company (9) | |
10.17
|
Employment Agreement dated August 1, 2003, by and between Guy Gecht and the Company (9) | |
10.18
|
Lease Financing of Properties Located in Foster City, California, dated as of July 16, 2004, among the Company, Société Générale Financial Corporation and Société Générale (14) | |
10.19
|
Lease Financing of Properties Located in Foster City, California, dated as of September 30, 2004, among the Company, Société Générale Financial Corporation and Société Générale (16) | |
24.2
|
Power of Attorney (see signature page) | |
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
+
|
The Company has received confidential treatment with respect to portions of these documents. | |
(1)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-50966) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(2)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 33-57382) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(3)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 on June 24, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(4)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Report of Unscheduled Events on Form 8-K on September 8, 1999 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(5)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(6)
|
Filed as exhibit (d) (1) to the Companys Schedule TO-T on September 14, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(7)
|
Filed as exhibit (d) (5) to the Companys TO/A Number 3 on October 20, 2000 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(8)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(9)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended |
45
September 30, 2003 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | ||
(10)
|
Filed as an exhibit to Printcafe Software, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-82646) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(11)
|
Filed as an exhibit to T/R Systems, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-82646) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(12)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 on June 16, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(13)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(14)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(15)
|
Filed as exhibit 10 to Amendment No. 2 to the Schedule 13D filed on February 26, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(16)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Form 8-K filed on October 6, 2004 (File No. 000-18805 and incorporated herein by reference. | |
(17)
|
Filed as an exhibit to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (File No. 000-18805) and incorporated herein by reference. |
46