UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2004

Or

For the transition period from                     to                    

Commission File Number 333-85503

Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 787-792-6052

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES [X] NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer.

YES [  ] NO [X]

At August 16, 2004, 25 million shares of no par common stock of the registrant were outstanding.

1

INDEX

Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. and Subsidiaries

2

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(In thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

TELECOMUNICACIONES DE PUERTO RICO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

1.		Business / Corporate Structure
		Telecomunicaciones de Puerto Rico, Inc., a Puerto Rico corporation (the “Company“or “we”), holds 100% of the common stock of Puerto Rico Telephone Company, Inc. (“PRTC”), PRT Larga Distancia, Inc. (“PRTLD”), and Datacom Caribe, Inc. (“Datacom”). The Company also holds a 67% interest in Coqui.net Corporation (“Coqui.net”), in which Popular, Inc., one of our shareholders, holds the remaining 33% interest. The Company also holds a 24% interest in Verizon Information Services Puerto Rico, Inc. S. en C. (“VISI”), in which GTE Holdings (Puerto Rico) LLC, our majority shareholder also holds a 36% interest. The Company is the largest telecommunications service provider in Puerto Rico. PRTC is the incumbent local exchange carrier for the island of Puerto Rico. Wireline service is provided by PRTC and cellular service is provided by the wireless division of PRTC, under the brand of Verizon Wireless Puerto Rico (“Verizon Wireless”). The Company’s off-island long distance service is provided by PRTLD. The Company’s dial-up Internet access service is provided by Coqui.net and the directory publishing revenues are generated by VISI.
		GTE Corporation (“GTE”), through its subsidiary GTE Holdings (Puerto Rico) LLC, acquired a 40% interest and management control over the Company on March 2, 1999 from Puerto Rico Telephone Authority (“PRTA”), an entity of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the “Acquisition”). In the Acquisition, Popular, Inc. acquired a 10% interest in the Company. GTE and Bell Atlantic Corporation merged on June 30, 2000 to form Verizon Communications Inc. (“Verizon”). On January 25, 2002, GTE Holdings (Puerto Rico) LLC and Popular, Inc. acquired an additional 12% and 3% interest in the Company, respectively, by exercising an option each held since the Acquisition (the “Option Exercise”). Verizon and Popular, Inc. obtained the additional ownership interest from PRTA Holdings Corp., a subsidiary of the PRTA (“PRTA Holdings”). Verizon and Popular, Inc. paid PRTA Holdings $138 million and $34 million, respectively, for a total of $172 million in cash for the additional 3,750,000 shares at a $45.9364 per share price established in the Share Option Agreement, an agreement entered into at the time of the Acquisition. As a result, Verizon now owns 52%, PRTA owns 28%, Popular owns 13% and the Employee Stock Ownership Plan owns 7% of the outstanding capital stock of the Company. The Company is an affiliate of Verizon, which consolidates the Company’s financial results with its own financial results.
2.		Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
		Basis of Presentation
		The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. Management believes the financial statements include all adjustments and recurring accruals necessary to present fairly the results of operations and financial condition for the interim periods shown. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2003 was derived from audited financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.
		Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets
		Assets are assessed for impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values are not recoverable. Effective, January 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. Losses are recognized in circumstances where impairment exists, at the amount by which the carrying value of assets exceeds fair value. Fair value is determined based on quoted market prices, if not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including a discounted value of estimated future cash flows and fundamental analysis.

7

		For the last three years, the Company has been operating a TDMA network and CDMA network for its wireless clients. During 2003 management decided to migrate in 2004 all TDMA clients to the CDMA network and subsequently dispose of the TDMA network. The expected undiscounted future cash flow from operations on the TDMA network was estimated to be $27 million ($47.4 million estimated cash flows from operations less $20.4 million of related expenses). The discounted fair value of the network was estimated to $26 million and was determined by discounting anticipated discounted future cash flows at a risk free rate of 3.76%.
		Since the estimated fair value of $26 million is lower than the $37.8 million carrying amount of the TDMA network as of December 31, 2003, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $11.8 million.
		Restatement
		The Company’s results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 have been restated from amounts previously reported. The restated amounts reflect a change in accounting for directory publishing revenues, effective January 1, 2003 (see Note 3).
		Reclassifications
		Reclassifications of prior periods’ data have been made to conform to the current period’s presentation.
3.		Accounting Change for Directory Revenue Recognition
		Effective January 1, 2003, the Company changed its method of accounting for directory-publishing revenues and related expenses from the point-of-publication method to the amortization method.
		Under the point-of-publication method, such revenues and related expenses are recognized on the date that the directory is published and substantially delivered. Under the amortization method, pre-publication revenues and expenses are deferred and capitalized, respectively. Subsequent to publication, revenues are recognized and expenses amortized over the lives of the directories, which is generally one year.
		While both methods fully comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, the Company adopted the amortization method because it is becoming the industry standard.
		The cumulative effect of applying this accounting change to prior years was recognized as of January 1, 2003 as a one-time, non-cash loss of $17 million ($13 million, after tax). The effect of applying the new method for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 was a one-time non-cash revenue increase of $3 million, which was included in operating income.
4.		Summary of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
		Asset Retirement Obligations
		On January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” This statement provides the accounting for the cost of legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets. SFAS No. 143 requires that companies recognize the fair value of a liability for asset retirement obligations in the period in which the obligations are incurred and capitalize that amount as part of the book value of the long-lived asset. We have determined that PRT does not have a material legal obligation to remove long-lived assets as described by this statement. However, we have included estimated removal costs in our group depreciation models. These costs have increased depreciation expense and accumulated depreciation for future removal costs for existing assets. These removal costs are recorded as a reduction to accumulated depreciation when the assets are retired and removal costs are incurred.
		For some assets, such as telephone poles, the removal costs exceed salvage value. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 143, we are required to exclude costs of removal from our depreciation rates for assets for which the removal costs exceed salvage. Accordingly, in connection with the initial adoption of this standard on January 1, 2003, we have reversed accrued costs of removal in excess of salvage from our accumulated depreciation accounts for these assets. The adjustment was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change, resulting in the recognition of an estimated gain

8

		of $117 million ($71 million after-tax). Effective January 1, 2003, we began expensing costs of removal in excess of salvage for these assets as incurred. The impact of this change in accounting resulted in a decrease in depreciation expense and an increase in operational and support expenses. The net increase to operating income in 2003, excluding the cumulative effect adjustment, was approximately $12 million ($7 million after-tax).
		Amendments of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
		In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendments of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.” SFAS No. 149 is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. In addition, all provisions of SFAS No. 149 should be applied prospectively. However, the provisions of this statement that relate to SFAS 133 Implementation Issues that have been effective for fiscal quarters beginning prior to June 15, 2003 continue to be applied in accordance with their respective effective dates. The Company evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 149 and concluded that there is no material effect on its results of operations and financial condition.
		Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity
		In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity.” This standard clarifies the accounting for certain financial instruments that, under previous guidance, issuers could account for as equity. SFAS No. 150 requires that those instruments be classified as liabilities in statements of financial position. The requirements of this statement apply to issuers’ classification and measurement of freestanding financial instruments, including those that comprise more than one option or forward contract. SFAS No. 150 is effective for all financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company evaluated the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 150 and concluded that there is no material effect on its results of operations and financial condition.
		Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
		In November 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) of the FASB reached a consensus on EITF No. 00-21, “Accounting for Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables.” EITF No. 00-21 addresses how to account for arrangements that may involve multiple revenue-generating activities. Specifically, the issue addresses how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting. The consensus guidance will be applicable to agreements entered into in quarters beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company evaluated the impact of the adoption of EITF No. 00-21 and concluded that there is no material effect on its results of operations and financial condition.

9

5.		Property, Plant and Equipment
		Property, plant and equipment consist of:

		Under the provisions of SFAS No. 143, we are required to exclude costs of removal from our depreciation rates for assets for which the removal costs exceed salvage. Accordingly, in connection with the initial adoption of this standard on January 1, 2003, we have reversed accrued costs of removal in excess of salvage from our accumulated depreciation accounts for these assets. The adjustment was recorded as a cumulative effect of an accounting change, resulting in the recognition of an estimated gain of $117 million ($71 million after-tax). Effective January 1, 2003, the Company began expensing costs of removal in excess of salvage for these assets as incurred. The impact of this change in accounting will result in a decrease in depreciation expense and an increase in operational and support expenses. The net increase to operating income in 2003, excluding the cumulative effect adjustment, was approximately $12 million ($7 million after-tax).
		During the fourth quarter of 2003, the board of directors approved the replacement of the Company’s General Ledger System and Inventory Management System. The new systems are expected to be operational during the fourth quarter of 2004 at projected capitalized costs for software and labor of approximately $13 million. As of June 30, 2004, the Company had capitalized costs of $8 million associated with the new systems.
		The Company is currently undergoing its periodic review of plant useful lives estimates. The review incorporates the impact of technology, future competition and assumptions employed in the industry relative to depreciation and retirement rates.
6.		Goodwill
		Following is a breakdown of goodwill.

10

7.

Intangibles

		SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, no longer permits the amortization of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets. Instead, these assets must be reviewed annually (or, under certain conditions, more frequently) for impairment in accordance with this statement. This impairment test uses fair value approach.
		Intangible assets that do not have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their useful lives and reviewed for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. For 2003, the Company has evaluated its assets using the fair value approach for each reporting unit to determine if there is an impairment exposure (transitional impairment test) and the impact it would have on the Company’s results of operations. The evaluation of the two reporting units revealed no impairment exposure.
		The Company is currently undergoing its annual evaluation of assets to determine if there is an impairment exposure and related impact, if any, to the Company results of operations of 2004.
8.		Other assets
		Other assets consist of:

11

9.		Pension Plan
		The Company has noncontributory pension plans for full-time employees, which are tax qualified as they meet Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (the “ERISA”) requirements. The Company realizes tax deductions when contributions are made to the trusts. The trusts invest in equity and fixed income securities to meet the benefit obligation.
		The pension benefit is composed of two elements. An employee receives an annuity at retirement when they reach the rule of 85 (age plus years of service). The annuity is calculated by applying a percentage times years of service to the last three years of salary. The second element is a lump sum based on years of service, up to a maximum of nine months of salary for hourly employees and twelve months of salary for salaried employees.
		There are separate trusts for the annuity and the lump sum benefit with a further separation of the annuity benefit into a plan for the UIET union, for the HIETEL union and management employees. Health care and life insurance benefits are provided to retirees.
		The components of the net pension and other post-employment benefit expenses for the quarters ended June 30,
		(In thousands)

		Cash Flows
		The Company expects to contribute $153 million to the pension and lump sum plans and $30 million to the post-retirement plan in 2004. We have adequate liquidity resources to fund these amounts. As of June 30, 2004, $93 million of pension plan contributions have been made.
		Medicare Drug Act
		On December 8, 2003, the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (Medicare Drug Act) was signed into law. The Medicare Drug Act introduces a prescription drug benefit under Medicare (Medicare Part D) as well as a federal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefit plans that provide a benefit that is at least actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D. Any measure of the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or net periodic post retirement cost in the financial statements or accompanying notes do not reflect any amount associated with the subsidy because federal regulations for determining actuarial equivalence have not yet been issued in either proposed or final form, which impacts our ability to estimate the full adoption effects. Without a firm definition of actuarial equivalence, we are unable to determine if the prescription drug benefits provided to the Company’s plan participants are actuarially equivalent to Medicare Part D benefits and are therefore unable to quantify any potential impact at this time.

12

10.		Early Retirement and Voluntary Separation Provision
		In January 2003, 29 qualified management employees accepted the voluntary separation program, offered by the Company to qualified management employees during the fourth quarter of 2002, representing an expense of $1.4 million, which was recorded in the first quarter 2003. During the second quarter of 2003, the Company offered to members of one of the unions a voluntary separation program that closed on June 20, 2003, which 44 qualified employees accepted. Also, during the second quarter of 2003, an additional 147 employees in the craft union accepted a retirement program offered by the Company that closed on June 30, 2003. As a result of these two programs, an additional non-cash provision of $3.3 million was recorded in the second quarter 2003.
		In December 2003, the Company offered an early retirement program to qualified management employees. A non-cash provision of $12.6 million was recorded relating to 147 employees who had accepted as of December 31, 2003. In January 2004, an additional 19 qualified management employees accepted the early retirement program offered by the Company in December 2003, which resulted in a provision of $1.6 million.
11.		Deferred ESOP Compensation
		The Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) acquired a 3% interest in the Company in 1999 with a $26 million, twenty-year note borrowed from the Company to establish a contributory investment fund for employees. The ESOP only invests in shares of the Company’s common stock. Shares are held by the ESOP’s trustee and maintained in a suspense account until they are released to employee participants. The yearly release of shares to participants is based on the greater of participant contributions plus a Company match of 30% up to 5% of wages or a minimum based on an amortization schedule. The minimum is based on the ratio of annual debt service to total debt service multiplied by the initial 750,000 shares.
		Compensation expense is recorded based on the release of shares at market value, which is based on an independent appraisal performed annually. The ESOP released approximately 36,072 shares in 2003. This release resulted in compensation expense of $2 million for year ended December 31, 2003, reflecting the market value of the shares. The release of shares, based upon the per share price established at the Acquisition, amounted to $1.3 million for December 31, 2003, which is reflected as a reduction of deferred ESOP compensation in equity.
12.		Other Current Liabilities
		Other current liabilities consist of:

13

13.		Debt
		Debt consists of:

		The senior notes, commercial paper, term credit facilities, working capital facility, and bank notes are unsecured and non-amortizing. PRTC is the guarantor of these debt instruments. The senior notes indentures and credit facility agreements do not contain dividend restrictions.
		The Company has a $360 million commercial paper program with maturities not to exceed 364 days, which is backed by two working capital facilities. The commercial paper dealer agreement was signed in November 2000. In March 2004, the Company’s existing $400 million bank note credit facility matured. On March 2, 2004 the Company entered into a new unsecured, $360 million 364-day revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks and other lenders for whom Citibank, N.A. acts as administrative agent, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Puerto Rico acts as syndication agent and Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, FirstBank Puerto Rico and Scotiabank de Puerto Rico act as co-documentation agents.
		Amounts borrowed under this facility are guaranteed by PRTC, and bear interest at the applicable Eurodollar rate plus a margin or at the base rate; which is the higher of the base rate publicly announced by the administrative agent from time to time or the Federal Funds rate plus 0.5%, plus a margin. The Company is also required to pay a quarterly facility fee on commitments under the facility and a quarterly utilization fee on borrowed amounts that exceed 50% of the commitments under the facility. Accrued interest on Eurodollar rate borrowings is payable based on elected intervals of one, two, three or six months or other interest period as the Company may select, subject to certain conditions. Accrued interest on base rate borrowings is payable quarterly.
		This facility matures on March 1, 2005, on which date the Company has the right to convert outstanding amounts into a term loan that matures on March 1, 2006. This facility contains negative covenants, including covenants which limit the Company’s ability to grant or permit liens on its or subsidiaries’ properties, merge or sell all or substantially all of its assets and permit its subsidiaries to incur debt. This facility also requires that the Company maintain certain financial ratios. Upon the occurrence of a default or an event of default, the lenders have various remedies or rights, which may include termination of the lenders’ obligations to make advances and declare all borrowed amounts and interest thereon immediately due and payable. The intended purpose of this facility is for working facility purposes and serves as backstop facility for commercial paper program.
		The Company had a $40 million working capital credit facility with Banco Popular de Puerto Rico, an affiliate of Popular, Inc. that matured on June 2004. On June 2004, the Company renewed the undrawn $40 million working capital credit facility maturing on June 30, 2005. Amounts outstanding under this facility bear interest at a rate of 30 basis points over LIBOR. This facility serves as additional backstop for the commercial paper program. At June 30, 2004, the Company had no outstanding balance under this facility.

14

		At December 31, 2002, the Company had $225 million in term credit facilities with maturities ranging from two to three years, and bearing interest from 60 to 100 basis points over LIBOR. By October 29, 2003 the Company repaid one of the $50 million term loans, and prepaid principal in an aggregate amount of $62 million of the outstanding term credit loans, while reducing interest rate to 70 basis points over LIBOR. One of the $30 million term loans matured on May 16, 2004. The Company renewed the $30 million term loan at an interest rate of 57 basis points over LIBOR maturity due on May 16, 2005.
		On August 31, 2001, the Company entered into an interest rate swap contract with a notional amount of $150 million. In September 2002, the Company drew the value out of the hedge position without changing the fixed/floating funding mix of the original swap transaction. This transaction resulted in cash proceeds of $11 million, reflected in cash from operations as required by SFAS No. 104, and created a deferred derivative, which will be amortized until 2006. As of June 30, 2004, the unamortized balance of the deferred derivative is $5 million. The purpose of the swap is to hedge against changes in the fair market value of the Company’s senior notes to achieve a targeted mix of fixed and variable rate debt. The swap receives interest at a fixed rate of 6.65% and pays interest at a net variable rate equal to six month LIBOR plus 170 basis points, with semiannual settlements and reset dates every May 15 and November 15 until maturity of the May 15, 2006 senior notes. The swap was entered into “at market” and as a result, there was no exchange of premium at the initial date of the swap. The Company designates the swap as a hedge of the changes in fair market value of the senior notes due to changes in the designated benchmark interest rate. PRTC is the guarantor of the interest rate swap.
		Aggregate maturities of the senior notes and term credit facilities are as follow:

		Currently, the Company is in compliance with debt covenant agreements and with the financial ratios as specified by term facilities.
14.		Other Non-Current Liabilities
		Other non-current liabilities consist of:

15

15.		Shareholders’ Equity
		Common Stock
		Common stock consists of fifty million authorized shares, no par value, of which twenty five million shares were outstanding at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
		Subscription Receivable
		The subscription receivable reflects receipts from the PRTA originally recorded at its present value (at an 8% discount rate). As part of the Acquisition agreement, the PRTA agreed to contribute a total of $200 million in cash or stock as a capital contribution in equal installments of $40 million over five years beginning on March 2, 2000. The Company employed the $200 million capital contribution to partially fund its underfunded pension and other post-employment benefit obligations, as agreed. The stock purchase agreement required the Company to contribute $66 million, which included the $40 million received from PRTA, to the pension plan immediately upon receipt of the proceeds each year. The Company received the fifth and final $40 million installment in March 2004 and made the required pension payment of $66 million. All installments were made in cash.
		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
		The accumulated other comprehensive loss represents unrecognized losses, other than unrecognized prior service costs which are reflected as an other asset, associated with the hourly employee pension fund since the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets.
		The accumulated other comprehensive loss amount as of December 31, 2003 has been adjusted in the amount of $64.8 million in order to reflect the after-tax amount in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No.130 “Reporting Comprehensive Income”.
		Dividends
		The Company’s shareholders’ agreement requires the payment of dividends equal to at least 50% of consolidated net income to be paid in the following quarter to the extent funds are legally available.
		Dividends payments were made in the following periods:

The senior notes indentures and credit facility agreements do not contain dividend restrictions.

16

16.		Fair Value of Financial Instruments
		The carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:

17.		Segment Reporting
		The Company has two reportable segments: Wireline and Wireless.
		The Wireline segment consists of:

	•		Local services, including basic voice, telephone and telecommunications equipment rentals, value-added services, high-speed private line services, Internet access and public phone service;
	•		Access services to long distance carriers, competitive local exchange carriers, and cellular and paging operators to originate and terminate calls on our network;
	•		Long distance services including direct dial on-island and off-island, operator assisted calls, prepaid calling card and high-speed private line services;
	•		Directory publishing rights services; and
	•		Telecommunication equipment sales and billing and collection services to competing long distance operators in Puerto Rico.

The Wireless segment consists of:

	•		Cellular service; and
	•		Wireless equipment sales.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those followed by the Company (see Note 2). The Company accounts for intersegment revenues at market prices.

17

Segment results for the Company are as follow:

18

18.		Condensed Consolidating Information
		The following summarizes the unaudited condensed consolidating financial information as of June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 and for the quarters then ended presents the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of (i) the Company as if it had accounted for its subsidiaries using the equity method, (ii) the Guarantor Subsidiary (as defined below); and (iii) the Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries (as defined below) on a combined basis. The consolidation entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and intercompany balances and transactions.
		The Notes are guaranteed by PRTC (the “Guarantor Subsidiary”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, but not guaranteed by the Company’s other subsidiaries, Coqui.net, PRTLD and Datacom (the “Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The guarantee by the Guarantor Subsidiary is full and unconditional.

19

Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets
June 30, 2004
(In thousands)