UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

DYNAMEX INC.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(214) 561-7500

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes x     No

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes     x     No

     The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of June 4, 2004 was 11,357,497 shares.

DYNAMEX INC.

INDEX

1

DYNAMEX INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except per share data)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2

DYNAMEX INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

DYNAMEX INC.
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

DYNAMEX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business — Dynamex Inc. (the “Company” and “Dynamex”) provides same-day delivery and logistics services in the United States and Canada. The Company’s primary services are (i) same-day, on-demand delivery, (ii) scheduled distribution and (iii) fleet management.

The operating subsidiaries of the Company, with country of incorporation, are as follows:

	•		Dynamex Operations East, Inc. (U.S.)
	•		Dynamex Operations West, Inc. (U.S.)
	•		Dynamex Dedicated Fleet Services, Inc. (U.S.)
	•		Dynamex Canada Corp. (Canada)
	•		Alpine Enterprises Ltd. (Canada)
	•		Roadrunner Transportation, Inc. (U.S.)
	•		New York Document Exchange Corp. (U.S.)

Basis of presentation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Dynamex Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. All dollar amounts in the financial statements and notes to the financial statements except per share data are stated in thousands of dollars unless otherwise indicated. Except as otherwise indicated, references to years mean our fiscal year ending July 31, 2004 or ended July 31 of the year referenced, and comparisons are to the corresponding period of the prior year.

The accompanying interim financial statements are unaudited. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted, although the Company believes the disclosures included herein are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The results of the interim periods presented are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full fiscal year, and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2003.

The accompanying interim financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position at April 30, 2004, the results of its operations for the three and nine month periods ended April 30, 2004 and 2003, and cash flows for the nine month periods ended April 30, 2004 and 2003. The tax provision for the three and nine month periods ended April 30, 2004 and 2003 are based upon management’s estimate of the Company’s annualized effective tax rate.

2. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The two components of comprehensive income are net income and foreign currency translation adjustments. Comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2004 was as follows:

3. INTANGIBLES

5

DYNAMEX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

At April 30, 2004, intangibles and related amortization expense for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2004 and 2003 consist of the following:

Amortization of deferred financing fees is classified as interest expense in the consolidated statement of operations. Estimated amortization expense for the succeeding five fiscal years, including deferred bank financing fees, is $631 for 2004, $54 for 2005 through 2007 and approximately $29 in 2008. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, in connection with the refinancing of the Company’s credit facility, the Company wrote off $450 of deferred bank financing costs.

4. COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computation as required by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings Per Share. Common stock equivalents related to stock options are excluded from diluted earnings per share calculation if their effect would be anti-dilutive to earnings per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle.

5. STOCK OPTION PLAN

Effective August 1, 2003, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123) for stock-based employee compensation. Under the modified prospective method of adoption selected by the Company under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure, stock-based employee compensation cost recognized in 2004 is the same as that which would have been recognized had the fair value

6

DYNAMEX INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 been applied to all awards granted after August 1, 1995. Results for prior periods have not been restated. During the three and nine month periods ended April 30, 2004, the company recognized $49 and $251, respectively, related to stock based compensation.

Prior to fiscal 2004, the Company applied APB Opinion No. 25 and related interpretations in accounting for its stock options. The exercise price of stock options granted was equal to the market price of the stock on the date of grant; therefore, using the intrinsic value method to value the options, no compensation cost had been recognized for stock options in the financial statements. Had the Company determined compensation cost based on the fair value at the grant date for its stock options consistent with the method set forth under SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net earnings would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

The fair value of each grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2004 and 2003, respectively: dividend yield of 0% for all years; expected volatility of 86% and 76%; risk-free interest rate of 4.11% and 4.10%; and expected lives of an average of 10 years for all years. The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2004 and 2003 was $10.40 and $3.13, respectively.

7

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

     This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve assumptions regarding Company operations and future prospects. Although the Company believes its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are subject to risk and uncertainty, including, among other things, competition, foreign exchange, and risks associated with the same-day transportation industry. These and other risks are mentioned from time to time in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Caution should be taken that these factors could cause the actual results to differ from those stated or implied in this and other Company communications.

General

The Company is the leading provider of same-day delivery and logistics services in the United States and Canada. Through internal growth and acquisitions, the Company has built a national network of same-day delivery and logistics systems in Canada and has established operations in 23 U.S. metropolitan areas.

A significant portion of the Company’s revenues is generated in Canada. For the three and nine month periods ended April 30, 2004, Canadian revenues accounted for approximately 32.3% and 33.4%, respectively of total consolidated revenue, compared to 34.3% and 33.8% the same periods during 2003. The exchange rate translating the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar increased 11.1% and 15.3%, respectively, in the three and nine month periods ended April 30, 2004 compared to the corresponding periods in the prior year. Had the exchange rate been the same as in those prior periods, Canadian sales for the three and nine month periods ended April 30, 2004 would have accounted for 30.0% and 30.3%, respectively, of total sales.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based on the Company’s financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting policies generally accepted in the United States of America. The Company believes certain critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of financial statements. A description of the Company’s critical accounting policies is set forth in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2003. As of, and for the three and nine month periods ended April 30, 2004, there have been no material changes or updates to the Company’s critical accounting policies except for the adoption of the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 for stock-based employee compensation (see Note 5).

Results of Operations

8

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three months ended April 30, 2004 compared to three months ended April 30, 2003

Net income for the three months ended April 30, 2004 was $2.3 million ($0.20 per fully diluted share) compared to $2.1 million ($0.18 per fully diluted share) for the three months ended April 30, 2003. The increase was attributable to increased sales volume and the associated increase in gross profit, which were offset in part by higher selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG & A”) and income taxes.

Sales for the three months ended April 30, 2004 were $74 million, a 19.1% increase over the sales in the same period in 2003 of $62 million. Sales in the U.S. increased $9.3 million, or 22.7%, virtually all of which came from our scheduled, distribution and outsourcing services. The average conversion rate between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar increased 11.1% over the prior year quarter, which had the effect of increasing sales for the three months ended April 30, 2004 by approximately $2.4 million had the conversion rate been the same as the prior year period. Excluding the effect of this increase, sales would have been approximately 15.3% higher in the current quarter compared to the prior year. If the exchange rate had been the same in 2004 as it was in 2003, on-demand sales would have increased approximately $0.3 million, or 1.2%, in the current period and scheduled, distribution and outsourcing services would have shown an increase of $9.2 million, or 26.8%.

Cost of sales for the three months ended April 30, 2004 increased $8.8 million, or 19.8%, to $53.1 million from $44.3 million for the same period in 2003. Cost of sales, as a percentage of sales, increased to 71.7% for the three months ended April 30, 2004 from 71.3% for the same period ended in 2003. The primary reason for the increase in cost of sales percentage is the change in business mix. Sales of scheduled, distribution and outsourcing services continue to grow faster than on-demand sales. On-demand sales generally produce a higher gross margin primarily due to the smaller size of delivery vehicles compared to other services; however, on-demand services are transaction intensive, requiring higher SG & A costs compared to other services. While on-demand sales will continue to be a major component of our comprehensive service menu, management expects on-demand sales will comprise a smaller portion of anticipated sales growth, while scheduled, distribution and outsourcing services likely will account for most of the projected growth. On-demand sales were approximately 40% of total sales in the current year quarter compared to 45% in the prior year.

SG & A expenses for the three months ended April 30, 2004 increased $1.8 million, or 12.4%, to $16.2 million from $14.4 million for the same period in 2003. Approximately $0.5 million of this increase is due to the increase in the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar. Excluding the impact of the exchange rate, the largest increase in SG & A was salaries and benefits ($1.0 million). This increase is primarily attributable to additional personnel necessary to manage the new business and pay commissions on those sales. The improved operating performance during the current quarter also led to higher bonuses earned by management and operating personnel. The Company also incurred the following additional SG & A expenses in this quarter compared to the same quarter in the prior year: higher medical and state unemployment insurance premiums ($125,000), stock options expense ($49,000) and software maintenance costs ($75,000). As a percentage of sales, SG & A expenses were 21.9% for the three months ended April 30, 2004, compared to 23.2% in the same period last year.

For the three months ended April 30, 2004, depreciation and amortization was slightly lower ($44,000) than for the same period in 2003. Management expects that this expense will remain relatively flat over the next several quarters.

Interest expense for the three months ended April 30, 2004 was $0.6 million, an increase of $43,000 over the prior year. During this quarter, the Company replaced its existing credit agreement with a new $30,000,000 Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility (“Credit Facility”) that matures on November 30, 2007. As a result of this transaction, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the Company wrote off $0.4 million in unamortized deferred financing costs on the old credit agreement. Excluding this write-off, interest expense was down 71% compared to the prior year. This decrease is attributable to lower outstanding debt, a reduced margin charged by the Company’s lenders and lower amortization of deferred financing costs. The weighted average interest rate on the Company’s outstanding debt at April 30, 2004 was 2.9%, compared to 4.9% at April 30, 2003. The rate is lower in the current quarter because of the reduced margin on the Company’s debt due to the Company’s improved EBITDA ratio, and the lower interest provided for in the new Credit Facility.

The effective income tax rate was 37% in the current quarter compared to 10% in the prior year quarter. Income tax expense in 2003 was reduced by approximately $425,000 associated with a foreign tax credit created by Dynamex Canada Corp.’s

9

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

payment of a $2.5 million cash dividend to Dynamex Inc. Excluding the tax benefit of this transaction, the effective income tax rate in the quarter ended April 30, 2003 would have been 33%.

Nine months ended April 30, 2004 compared to nine months ended April 30, 2003

Net income for the nine months ended April 30, 2004 was $9.8 million ($0.85 per fully diluted share). During the quarter ended January 31, 2004, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that the benefits of the net operating loss (NOL) carryforward totaling $10.6 million will be realized. The Company had provided a 100% valuation allowance on this NOL and based on the determination that the Company would be able to realize the NOL, reversed the valuation allowance during its second fiscal quarter, resulting in a credit to income tax expense of approximately $3.7 million. Excluding the effects of this adjustment, net income for the nine months ended April 30, 2004 was $6.1 million ($0.53 per fully diluted share) compared to net income of $5.4 million ($0.48 per fully diluted share) for the same period in 2003. This improvement results from higher gross profit associated with increased sales, lower interest, and lower depreciation and amortization expense, partially offset by increased SG & A expenses and higher income tax expense.

Sales for the nine months ended April 30, 2004 increased $30 million, or 16.5%, to $213 million from $183 million for the same period in 2003. Scheduled, distribution and outsourcing services increased $27.8 million (28.5%) compared to the prior year while on-demand sales increased $2.4 million (2.8%). The average conversion rate between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar increased 15.3% over the prior year period, which had the effect of increasing sales for the nine months ended April 30, 2004 by approximately $9.4 million had the conversion rate been the same as the prior year period. Excluding the effect of this increase, sales would have been approximately 11.4% higher in the nine months ended April 30, 2004 compared to the prior year. If the exchange rate had been the same in 2004 as it was in 2003, on-demand sales would have decreased approximately $2 million, or 2.3%, in the current period and scheduled, distribution and outsourcing services would have shown an increase of $22.8 million, or 23.3%.

Cost of sales for the nine months ended April 30, 2004 increased $23.7 million, or 18.3%, to $153 million and as a percentage of sales from 70.8% to 71.8% compared to the same period last year. The primary reason for the increase in cost of sales percentage continues to be the change in business mix. As noted above, on-demand sales generally produce a higher gross margin than scheduled, distribution and outsourcing services; however, on-demand sales also require higher SG & A costs than other services. Sales of scheduled, distribution and outsourcing services comprised approximately 59% and 53% of total sales in the nine months ended April 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. On-demand sales were approximately 41% of total sales in the current year period compared to 47% in the prior year.

SG & A expenses for the nine months ended April 30, 2004 increased $5.3 million, or 12.2%, to $48.1 million from $42.8 million for the same period in 2003. Approximately $1.8 million of this increase is due to the increase in the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar. Excluding the impact of the exchange rate, the largest increase in SG & A was salaries and wages ($2 million). The Company hired additional personnel to manage and service the significant new business startups and paid sales commissions on the new business generated. The improved operating performance during fiscal 2004 also led to higher bonuses earned by management and operating personnel. In addition, the Company incurred the following increases in costs in this period compared to the same period in the prior year: stock options expense ($251,000), software maintenance ($200,000), higher medical and state unemployment insurance premiums ($385,000), and investment in a customer relationship management system and training for our sales force ($190,000). Other increases include facilities and communications costs, travel costs and other costs related to new business start-ups, one-time costs related to relocation of the Chicago logistics center ($120,000), and additional professional fees incurred in connection with the Sarbanes-Oxley mandated reporting ($100,000). As a percentage of sales, SG & A expenses were 22.5% for the nine months ended April 30, 2004, compared to 23.4% in the same period last year.

Depreciation and amortization for the nine months ended April 30, 2004 was $1.5 million compared to $1.6 million for the same period in 2003. Management does not expect a significant change in the level of depreciation and amortization expense in the near future.

Interest expense was $1.3 million, a decrease of $0.5 million or 29% for the nine months ended April 30, 2004 compared to same period in 2003. Interest expense in the current period included the write-off of $0.4 million in unamortized deferred financing costs necessitated by the refinancing of the Company’s Credit Facility. Excluding this charge, interest expense as a percentage of sales was 0.4% compared to 0.9% in the same period last year. This decrease is attributable to lower outstanding debt, a reduced margin charged by the Company’s lenders and lower amortization of deferred financing costs.

10

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The effective income tax rate, before the reversal of the valuation allowance on the Company’s net operating loss carryforward in the current period and the $0.4 million impact of the foreign tax credit in the prior year, increased from 34% in the nine month period ended April 30, 2003 to 36% in the current period. The increase in the current year is generally due to higher levels of taxable income resulting from lower permanent differences, which were partially offset by the recognition of a foreign tax credit of $174,000 related to an $0.8 million dividend the Company’s Canadian subsidiary paid to the U.S. in October 2003.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Net cash provided by operating activities was $4.2 million for the nine months ended April 30, 2004 compared to $8.0 million for the same period in 2003. Net cash provided by operations, prior to changes in current operating assets and liabilities and deferred income taxes, was $12.1 million for the nine months ended April 30, 2004 compared to $7.7 million for the nine months ended April 30, 2003 due primarily to higher net income. The large increase in accounts receivable in the nine months ended April 30, 2004 is due primarily to the increase in sales during that period.

Capital expenditures for the nine months ended April 30, 2004 were approximately $1.5 million. Management expects capital expenditures to be in the $2.0 million range for the full fiscal year. The Company does not have significant capital expenditure requirements to replace or expand the number of vehicles used in its operations because substantially all of its drivers are owner-operators who provide their own vehicles.

On March 2, 2004, the Company replaced its existing bank credit agreement with a new $30,000,000 Senior Secured, Revolving Credit Facility that matures on November 30, 2007. Under the terms of the new facility, interest is payable quarterly at prime, or LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 1.25% to 1.75% (1.5% at April 30, 2004), based on the ratio of Funded Debt to EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Facility. There are no scheduled principal payments; however, the Company is required to maintain certain financial ratios related to minimum amounts of stockholder’s equity, fixed charges to cash flow, funded debt to cash flow and funded debt to eligible receivables, as defined. Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility are secured by all of the Company’s U.S. assets and 100% of the stock of its domestic subsidiaries. The Credit Facility also contains restrictions on incurring additional debt and investments by the Company as well as requiring the Company to maintain certain financial ratios.

Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility included borrowings of $15.8 million and outstanding letters of credit totaling $3.9 million. The Company has entered into an interest rate protection arrangement on a portion of the Credit Facility ($7.5 million at April 30, 2004). The interest rate has been fixed at the LIBOR margin plus 1.49% (2.99% at April 30, 2004). The portion of the Credit Facility subject to this interest rate protection agreement is reduced by $1.375 million per quarter until maturity. This arrangement matures November 30, 2005.

The Company’s EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) was approximately $12.2 million (5.7% of sales) for the nine months ended April 30, 2004, compared to $10.8 million (5.9% of sales) in the same period last year. The decrease as a percentage of sales is due to the lower gross margin, and the increased SG & A costs mentioned above including salaries and wages, stock options expense, the customer relationship management system implementation and training costs, software maintenance, and medical insurance premiums, among others. Management has included EBITDA in its discussion herein as a measure of liquidity because it believes that it is a widely accepted financial indicator of a company’s ability to service and/or incur indebtedness, maintain current operating levels of fixed assets and acquire additional operations and businesses. EBITDA should not be considered as a substitute for statement of operations or cash flow data from the Company’s financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the Company’s definition of EBITDA may not be identical to similarly entitled measures used by other companies. The following table reconciles net income presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to EBITDA, which is a non-GAAP financial measure (in thousands):

11

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Company’s cash flow prior to changes in current operating assets and liabilities and deferred income taxes, was $12.1 million. Consequently, purchases of property and equipment and payments of long-term debt were financed entirely by internally generated cash flow.

Management expects that its future capital requirements will generally be met from internally generated cash flow. The Company’s access to other sources of capital, such as additional bank borrowings and the issuance of debt securities, is affected by, among other things, general market conditions affecting the availability of such capital. The Company completed its last acquisition in August 1998. Should the Company pursue acquisitions in the future, the Company may be required to incur additional debt. There can be no assurance that the Company’s primary lenders will consent to such acquisitions or that if additional financing is necessary, it can be obtained on terms the Company deems acceptable.

Deferred Taxes

As of April 30, 2004 the Company has a U.S. net operating loss carryforward totaling approximately $8.5 million. The Company had previously established a 100% valuation allowance in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, (SFAS No. 109) for U.S. operating losses not currently deductible. The Company generated U.S. taxable income of approximately $2.1 million in the year ended July 31, 2003, has estimated U.S. taxable income of approximately $3.1 million through the first nine months of fiscal 2004, expects to generate taxable income for the remainder of 2004, and projects that it will generate taxable income over the next three years sufficient to realize the benefits of the NOL carryforward. Accordingly, during the quarter ended January 31, 2004, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that the benefits of the NOL will be realized and reversed the valuation allowance, resulting in a credit to income tax expense of approximately $3.7 million. As a result, management expects that the U.S. effective tax rate, before the impact of any foreign tax credits generated, for the remainder of fiscal 2004 will be approximately 38%. The remaining deferred tax assets represent deductions for financial statement purposes that will reduce future taxable income.

Inflation

The Company does not believe that inflation has had a material effect on the Company’s results of operations nor does it believe it will do so in the foreseeable future. However, there can be no assurance the Company’s business will not be affected by inflation in the future.

Risk Factors

In addition to other information in this report, the following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating the Company and its business. This report contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth in the following risk factors and elsewhere in this report.

Certain Tax Matters Related to Drivers

Substantially all of the Company’s drivers supply their own vehicles and as of April 30, 2004, over 90% of these owner-operators were independent contractors as opposed to employees of the Company. The Company does not pay or withhold any federal, state or provincial employment tax with respect to or on behalf of independent contractors. From time to time, taxing authorities in the U.S. and Canada have sought to assert that owner-operators in the transportation industry, including

12

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

those utilized by the Company, are employees, rather than independent contractors. The Company believes that the owner-operators utilized by the Company are not employees under existing interpretations of federal (U.S. and Canadian), state and provincial laws. However, there can be no assurance that federal (U.S. and Canadian), state or provincial authorities will not challenge this position, or that other laws or regulations, including tax laws, or interpretations thereof, will not change. If, as a result of any of the foregoing, the Company were required to pay withholding taxes and pay for and administer added employee benefits to these drivers, the Company’s operating costs would increase. Additionally, if the Company is required to pay back-up withholding with respect to amounts previously paid to such drivers, it may also be required to pay penalties or be subject to other liabilities as a result of incorrect classification of such drivers. Any of the foregoing circumstances could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, and/or require the Company to restate financial information from prior periods. The Company had filed for an income tax refund for prior years in the U.S., and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) elected to audit the amended returns for those periods. As part of this process, the IRS conducted an employment tax audit including a review of our use of independent contractors and concluded that no reclassification of independent contractors was required.

In addition to the drivers that are independent contractors, certain of the Company’s drivers are employed by the Company and supply and operate their own vehicles during the course of their employment. The Company reimburses these employees for all or a portion of the operating costs of those vehicles. The Company believes that these reimbursement arrangements do not represent additional compensation to those employees. However, there can be no assurance that federal (U.S. and Canadian), state or provincial taxing authorities will not seek to recharacterize some or all of such payments as additional compensation. If such amounts were so recharacterized, the Company would have to pay additional employment related taxes on such amounts, and may also be required to pay penalties, which could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations, and/or to restate financial information from prior periods.

Claims Exposure

As of April 30, 2004, the Company utilized the services of approximately 4,300 drivers and messengers. From time to time such persons are involved in accidents or other activities that may give rise to liability claims. The Company currently carries liability insurance with a per occurrence and an aggregate limit of $20 million. Owner-operators are required to maintain liability insurance of at least the minimum amounts required by applicable state or provincial law (generally such minimum requirements range from $35,000 to $75,000). The Company also has insurance policies covering property and fiduciary trust liability, which coverage includes all drivers and messengers. There can be no assurance that claims against the Company, whether under the liability insurance or the surety bonds, will not exceed the applicable amount of coverage, that the Company’s insurer will be solvent at the time of settlement of an insured claim, or that the Company will be able to obtain insurance at acceptable levels and costs in the future. If the Company were to experience a material increase in the frequency or severity of accidents, liability claims, workers’ compensation claims or unfavorable resolutions of claims, the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, significant increases in insurance costs could reduce the Company’s profitability.

Highly Competitive Industry

The market for same-day delivery and logistics services has been and is expected to remain highly competitive. Competition is often intense, particularly for basic delivery services. High fragmentation and low barriers to entry characterize the industry. Other companies in the industry compete with the Company not only for provision of services but also for acquisition candidates and qualified drivers. Some of these companies have longer operating histories and greater financial and other resources than the Company. Additionally, companies that do not currently operate delivery and logistics businesses may enter the industry in the future.

Foreign Exchange

Significant portions of the Company’s operations are conducted in Canada. Exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. and Canadian dollars result in fluctuations in the amounts relating to the Canadian operations reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Canadian dollar is the functional currency for the Company’s Canadian operations; therefore, any change in the exchange rate will affect the Company’s reported sales for such period. The Company historically has not entered into hedging transactions with respect to its foreign currency exposure, but may do so in the future. There can be no assurance that fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

13

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Permits and Licensing

The Company’s delivery operations are subject to various federal (U.S. and Canadian), state, provincial and local laws, ordinances and regulations that in many instances require certificates, permits and licenses. Failure by the Company to maintain required certificates, permits or licenses, or to comply with applicable laws, ordinances or regulations could result in substantial fines or possible revocation of the Company’s authority to conduct certain of its operations.

Dependence on Key Personnel

The Company’s success is largely dependent on the skills, experience and performance of certain key members of its management. The loss of the services of any of these key employees could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company’s future success and plans for growth also depend on its ability to attract and retain skilled personnel in all areas of its business. There is strong competition for skilled personnel in the same-day delivery and logistics businesses.

Risks Associated with the Same-day Transportation Industry; General Economic Conditions

The Company’s sales and earnings are especially sensitive to events that affect the same-day transportation industry including extreme weather conditions, economic factors affecting the Company’s significant customers and shortages of or disputes with labor, any of which could result in the Company’s inability to service its clients effectively or the inability of the Company to profitably manage its operations. In addition, downturns in the level of general economic activity and employment in the U.S. or Canada may negatively impact demand for the Company’s services.

Technological advances in the nature of facsimile and electronic mail have affected the market for on-demand document delivery services. Although the Company has shifted its focus to the distribution of non-faxable items and logistics services, there can be no assurance that these or other technologies will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations in the future.

Dependence on Availability of Qualified Delivery Personnel

The Company is dependent upon its ability to attract and retain qualified delivery personnel who possess the skills and experience necessary to meet the needs of its operations. The Company competes in markets in which unemployment is relatively low and the competition for couriers and other employees is intense. The Company must continually evaluate and upgrade its pool of available delivery and support personnel to keep pace with demands for delivery services. There can be no assurance that qualified delivery personnel will continue to be available in sufficient numbers and on terms acceptable to the Company. The ability of the Company to retain owner-operators may also be impacted by our ability to pass on fuel cost increases to customers to maintain profit margins and the quality of driver pay. The inability to attract and retain qualified delivery personnel would have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations.

“Safe Harbor” Statement Under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

With the exception of historical information, the matters discussed in this report are “forward looking statements” as that term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Several important factors have been identified, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those predicted. By way of example:

•		The competitive nature of the same-day delivery business.
•		The ability of the Company to attract and retain qualified delivery personnel as well as retain key management personnel.
•		A change in the current tax status of independent contractor drivers to employees or a change in the treatment of the reimbursement of vehicle operating costs to employee drivers.

14

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

•		A significant reduction in the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar.
•		Failure of the Company to maintain required certificates, permits or licenses, or to comply with applicable laws, ordinances or regulations could result in substantial fines or possible revocation of the Company’s authority to conduct certain of its operations.
•		The ability of the Company to obtain adequate financing.
•		The ability of the Company to retain owner-operators may be impacted by our ability to pass on fuel cost increases to customers to maintain profit margins and the quality of driver pay.

15

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Foreign Exchange Exposure

Significant portions of the Company’s operations are conducted in Canada. Exchange rate fluctuations between the U.S. and Canadian dollar result in fluctuations in the amounts relating to the Canadian operations reported in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Company historically has not entered into hedging transactions with respect to its foreign currency exposure, but may do so in the future.

The sensitivity analysis model used by the Company for foreign exchange exposure compares the revenue and net income figures from Canadian operations, at the actual exchange rate, to a 10% decrease in the exchange rate. Based on this model, a 10% decrease would result in a decrease in quarterly revenue of approximately $2.4 million and a decrease in quarterly net income of approximately $0.1 million. There can be no assurances that the above projected exchange rate decrease will materialize. Fluctuations of exchange rates are beyond the control of the Company’s management.

Interest Rate Exposure

The Company has entered into an interest rate protection arrangement on a portion of the Credit Facility. The interest rate has been fixed at the LIBOR margin plus 1.49% (2.99% at April 30, 2004). This hedging agreement expires on November 30, 2005. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.

The sensitivity analysis model used by the Company for interest rate exposure compares interest expense fluctuations over a one-year period based on current debt levels and current interest rates versus current debt levels at current interest rates with a 10% increase. Based on this model, a 10% increase would result in an increase in interest expense of less than $0.1 million. There can be no assurances that the above projected interest rate increase will materialize. Fluctuations of interest rates are beyond the control of the Company’s management.

16

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The term “disclosure controls and procedures” is defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act). These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within required time periods. The Company’s Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures and, based on such evaluation, have determined that such disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of April 30, 2004 (the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q).

The Company maintains a system of internal accounting controls that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that the Company’s books and records accurately reflect its transactions and that the established policies and procedures are followed. Subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, there were no significant changes to internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the Company’s internal controls.

17

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Part II. Other Information

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

The Company is a party to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of its business. Management believes that the ultimate resolution of these proceedings will not, in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity of the Company.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a)

Exhibits:

	10.14		Credit Agreement by and among the Company and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent for the lenders therein, dated March 2, 2004
	31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a) or 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)
	31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to 17 CFR 240.13a-14(a) or 17 CFR 240.15d-14(a)
	32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(b)

Reports on Form 8-K:

                    Report on Form 8-K filed on March 5, 2004 concerning the March 3, 2004 press release announcing second quarter fiscal year 2004 results

18

SIGNATURE

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	DYNAMEX INC.
Dated: June 7, 2004	by	/s/ Richard K. McClelland
		Richard K. McClelland
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)

Dated: June 7, 2004	by	/s/ Ray E. Schmitz
		Ray E. Schmitz
		Vice President - Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Dated: June 7, 2004	by	/s/ George S. Stephens
		George S. Stephens
		Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

19

EXHIBIT INDEX

E-1