SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-Q
þ
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the Quarterly period ended March 31, 2004 | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 000-26521
Delaware
|
94-3334199 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
5858 Horton St., Suite 350, Emeryville, CA 94608
(510) 985-7400
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes þ No o
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants Common Stock as of April 29, 2004 was 47,794,740.
The Exhibit Index begins on page 40.
ASK JEEVES, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cautionary Note regarding Forward-Looking Statements
In addition to historical information, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements are those that predict or describe future events or trends and that do not relate solely to historical matters. You can generally identify forward-looking statements as statements containing the words believe, expect, will, anticipate, intend, estimate, project, assume or other similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. All statements in this report regarding our future strategy, future operations, projected financial position, estimated future revenues, projected costs, future prospects, and results that might be obtained by pursuing managements current plans and objectives are forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements because the matters they describe are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other unpredictable factors, many of which are beyond our control. Our forward-looking statements are based on the information currently available to us and speak only as of the date on which this report was filed with the SEC. We expressly disclaim any obligation to issue any updates or revisions to our forward-looking statements, even if subsequent events cause our expectations to change regarding the matters discussed in those statements. Over time, our actual results, performance or achievements will likely differ from the anticipated results, performance or achievements that are expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements, and such difference might be significant and materially adverse to our stockholders. Many important factors that could cause such a difference are described in this Quarterly Report under the caption Risk Factors as well as in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K under the captions Competition, Proprietary Rights and Risk Factors, all of which you should review carefully. Please consider our forward-looking statements in light of those risks as you read this report.
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. | Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
ASK JEEVES, INC.
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
(Unaudited) | (Note 1) | |||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||||
Current assets:
|
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 67,699 | $ | 36,673 | ||||||
Marketable securities
|
125,991 | 143,975 | ||||||||
Total cash, cash equivalents and marketable
securities
|
193,690 | 180,648 | ||||||||
Accounts receivable, net
|
14,286 | 12,062 | ||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
4,499 | 3,299 | ||||||||
Total current assets
|
212,475 | 196,009 | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net
|
14,387 | 10,933 | ||||||||
Intangible assets, net
|
550 | 831 | ||||||||
Other assets, net
|
5,226 | 4,482 | ||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 232,638 | $ | 212,255 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
||||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
$ | 16,066 | $ | 12,050 | ||||||
Accrued compensation and related expenses
|
5,066 | 5,137 | ||||||||
Accrued restructuring costs
|
979 | 1,167 | ||||||||
Deferred revenue
|
4,147 | 5,367 | ||||||||
Total current liabilities
|
26,258 | 23,721 | ||||||||
Convertible subordinated notes
|
115,000 | 115,000 | ||||||||
Other liabilities
|
326 | 326 | ||||||||
Total liabilities
|
141,584 | 139,047 | ||||||||
Commitments and contingencies
|
||||||||||
Stockholders equity:
|
||||||||||
Convertible preferred stock, $.001 par
value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or
outstanding
|
| | ||||||||
Common stock, $.001 par value:
150,000,000 shares authorized 47,311,994 and
46,616,445 shares issued and outstanding at March 31,
2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively
|
744,572 | 740,845 | ||||||||
Accumulated deficit
|
(657,307 | ) | (670,686 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
3,789 | 3,049 | ||||||||
Total stockholders equity
|
91,054 | 73,208 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
$ | 232,638 | $ | 212,255 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
ASK JEEVES, INC.
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, | |||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 39,229 | $ | 22,715 | |||||
Cost of revenues
|
6,070 | 5,516 | |||||||
Gross profit
|
33,159 | 17,199 | |||||||
Operating expenses:
|
|||||||||
Product development
|
4,753 | 3,544 | |||||||
Sales and marketing
|
9,164 | 6,891 | |||||||
General and administrative
|
5,344 | 4,281 | |||||||
Total operating expenses
|
19,261 | 14,716 | |||||||
Operating income
|
13,898 | 2,483 | |||||||
Gain on acquisition of joint venture
|
| 6,124 | |||||||
Interest and other income, net
|
581 | 180 | |||||||
Income before income tax provision
|
14,479 | 8,787 | |||||||
Income tax provision
|
1,100 | 335 | |||||||
Income from continuing operations
|
13,379 | 8,452 | |||||||
Loss from discontinued operations
|
| (761 | ) | ||||||
Net income
|
$ | 13,379 | $ | 7,691 | |||||
Earnings per Share Basic:
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations
|
$ | 0.29 | $ | 0.20 | |||||
Loss from discontinued operations
|
$ | | $ | (0.02 | ) | ||||
Net income per share
|
$ | 0.29 | $ | 0.18 | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding used in
computing basic net income per share
|
46,885,863 | 42,197,514 | |||||||
Earnings per Share Diluted:
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations
|
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.17 | |||||
Loss from discontinued operations
|
$ | | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||||
Net income per share
|
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.16 | |||||
Weighted average shares outstanding used in
computing diluted net income per share
|
59,370,727 | 48,619,325 | |||||||
Revenues from related parties
|
$ | 1,131 | $ | 1,131 | |||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
ASK JEEVES, INC.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||||
Operating activities
|
||||||||||
Income from continuing operations
|
$ | 13,379 | $ | 8,452 | ||||||
Adjustment to reconcile income from continuing
operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations
|
| (761 | ) | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
1,732 | 2,026 | ||||||||
Stock compensation
|
191 | 34 | ||||||||
Amortization of other assets
|
464 | 529 | ||||||||
Gain on acquisition of joint venture
|
| (6,124 | ) | |||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
(2,224 | ) | 118 | |||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(2,127 | ) | (26 | ) | ||||||
Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities
|
4,016 | 2,072 | ||||||||
Accrued compensation and related expenses
|
(71 | ) | 452 | |||||||
Accrued restructuring costs
|
(188 | ) | 153 | |||||||
Deferred revenue
|
(1,220 | ) | (1,548 | ) | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
13,952 | 5,377 | ||||||||
Investing activities
|
||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment
|
(5,186 | ) | (949 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of marketable securities
|
| (1,544 | ) | |||||||
Redemption of marketable securities
|
18,056 | | ||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities
|
12,870 | (2,493 | ) | |||||||
Financing activities
|
||||||||||
Issuance of common stock
|
3,536 | 1,780 | ||||||||
Repayment of capital lease obligations
|
| (233 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
3,536 | 1,547 | ||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents
|
668 | (196 | ) | |||||||
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
31,026 | 4,235 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
36,673 | 27,613 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 67,699 | $ | 31,848 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
ASK JEEVES, INC.
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Company |
Ask Jeeves, Inc. (Ask Jeeves or the Company) is a provider of Web-based search technologies. The Company creates a search experience focused on understanding users specific needs and interests and connecting them to the most relevant information, products and services.
The Company operates four proprietary Web sites dedicated to search; Ask.com, Ask.co.uk, Teoma.com and AJKids.com. The Company also delivers, or syndicates, its search technology and advertising products to third-party Web sites, including portals, infomediaries, and content and destination Web sites. The company provides search results and/or advertising for those Web sites to display in response to their users search queries. The company refers to these third-party Web sites as its syndication network.
Until July 1, 2003, the Company operated through two divisions, Web Properties and Jeeves Solutions. On July 1, 2003, the Company sold certain assets used in the Jeeves Solutions business to Kanisa Inc. (Kanisa), at which time the Company ceased offering Jeeves Solutions software and services to corporate customers as described in Note 7 (Discontinued Operations). Jeeves Solutions core software application, JeevesOne, allowed corporate customers to add its intuitive search engine to their corporate Internet or intranet sites. With the purchase of additional modules, JeevesOne allowed users to search and access a variety of linked enterprise systems and legacy databases.
The Company was incorporated in California in June 1996 and reincorporated in Delaware in June 1999.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2004 and for the three months ended March 31, 2004 are unaudited, but include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position, operating results and cash flows as of the interim date and for the periods presented. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire fiscal year or future periods. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2003 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The investment in the Ask Jeeves Japan joint venture in which the Company has significant influence but does not have a controlling voting interest or a majority interest in the assets, obligations or results of operations is accounted for under the equity method. Investments in which the Company does not have the ability to exert significant influence are accounted for at cost. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated upon consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
6
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Concentrations of Revenue
During the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, paid placement revenues from one provider accounted for 69% and 44% of revenues from continuing operations, respectively. This provider accounted for 52% and 15% of gross accounts receivable as of March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Companys U.S. agreement with this provider is scheduled to terminate in September 2005 (but allows for termination for convenience by either party during September or October of 2004), and the Companys U.K. agreement with this provider is scheduled to terminate in May 2005.
Net Income Per Share
Basic net income per share is computed by dividing net income for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options, warrants, and convertible subordinated notes.
Stock-based Compensation
The Company accounts for employee stock options using the intrinsic value method and makes the required pro forma disclosures as if the fair value method had been used. Compensation expense based on the difference, if any, on the measurement date (generally the date of grant), between the estimated fair value of the Companys stock and the exercise price of options to purchase that stock is amortized over the vesting period of the related option using the graded vesting method.
Had compensation cost for the Companys stock-based compensation plans been determined using the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those plans calculated using the Black Scholes valuation model, the Companys net income and basic and diluted net income per share would have been decreased to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Net income, as reported
|
$ | 13,379 | $ | 7,691 | |||||
Deduct:
|
|||||||||
Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for Employee Stock
Purchase Plan
|
(139 | ) | (107 | ) | |||||
Total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under fair value based method for stock options
|
(3,539 | ) | (1,590 | ) | |||||
Net income, pro forma
|
$ | 9,701 | $ | 5,994 | |||||
Net income per share:
|
|||||||||
Basic, as reported
|
$ | 0.29 | $ | 0.18 | |||||
Basic, pro forma
|
$ | 0.21 | $ | 0.14 | |||||
Diluted, as reported
|
$ | 0.23 | $ | 0.16 | |||||
Diluted, pro forma
|
$ | 0.16 | $ | 0.13 |
7
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Reclassifications
Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifications did not affect previously reported net income.
2. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
From time to time, the Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business, including claims of alleged infringement of patents, trademarks, copyrights and other intellectual property rights, and a variety of claims arising in connection with its services, such as claims alleging defamation or invasion of privacy.
On October 25, 2001, a putative class action lawsuit captioned Leonard Turroff, et al. vs Ask Jeeves, Inc., et al. was filed against the Company and two of the Companys officers and directors (collectively the Individual Defendants) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Also named as defendants were Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, Goldman Sachs & Co., U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, and Dain Rauscher, Inc., the underwriters of the Companys initial public offering. The complaint alleges violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 against all defendants, and violations of Section 15 of the Securities Act against the Individual Defendants in connection with the Companys initial public offering (IPO). An amended complaint was filed on December 6, 2001, which includes the same allegations in connection with Ask Jeeves secondary offering in March 2000. The complaints seek unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of common stock between June 30, 1999 and December 6, 2000. The Company believes the claims are without merit and intends to defend the actions vigorously. On June 24, 2003, a special committee of our board of directors approved the settlement of this action, subject to certain conditions including that a sufficient number of the defendants participate in the settlement, and on July 9, 2003, the Individual Defendants approved the settlement of this action. It is anticipated that the settlement will be submitted to the Court for approval in the near future.
On January 27, 2004, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York captioned American Blind and Wallpaper, Inc. v. Google, Inc., et al., in which Ask Jeeves, Inc., America Online, Inc., Netscape Communications Corporation, Compuserve Interactive Services, Inc., and Earthlink, Inc. were also named as defendants. On February 27, 2004, the Company was served with an Amended Complaint in the matter. The Complaint alleges trademark infringement, false representation, and dilution under the Lanham Act and other claims arising from defendants alleged unlawful use of plaintiffs trademarks. Plaintiffs claims are based on the allegations that defendants sell keywords identical to plaintiffs marks to various third parties and by manipulating search results, consumers are unwittingly diverted to competitors products and services. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and an unspecified amount of damages. The Company has tendered this suit to Google for indemnification pursuant to the terms of the Advertising Services Agreement, dated July 17, 2002, between Ask Jeeves and Google, and Google has agreed to indemnify the Company to the extent the claims relate to the Google paid listing.
In managements opinion, resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the Companys results of operations, cash flows or financial position. However, depending on the amount and timing, an unfavorable resolution of these matters could materially and adversely affect the Companys future results of operations, cash flows or financial position in a future period.
8
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Indemnifications
While the Company has various guarantees included in contracts in the normal course of business, primarily in the form of indemnities, these guarantees do not represent significant commitments or contingent liabilities. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded a liability related to indemnification provisions.
3. CONVERTIBLE SUBORDINATED NOTES
In June 2003, the Company issued $115.0 million aggregate principal amount of zero coupon convertible subordinated notes, due June 1, 2008. The notes were sold at face value and the net proceeds to the Company were $111.5 million, net of costs of issuance of $3.5 million, which have been recorded as other assets and are being amortized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations over the contractual term of the notes.
The notes are convertible by the holders into shares of the Companys common stock at any time at a conversion price of $16.90 per share, subject to certain adjustments. This is equivalent to a conversion rate of approximately 59.1716 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. Upon conversion, the Company has the right subject to certain conditions to deliver cash (or a combination of cash and shares) in lieu of shares of its common stock.
The notes are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness, as defined in the indenture. The holders of the notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the notes, subject to specified exceptions, upon the occurrence of a change in control. The Company may choose to pay the repurchase price in cash, shares of its common stock, shares of the surviving corporation or a combination thereof. The Company may not redeem the notes prior to the maturity date.
4. RESTRUCTURING AND FACILITY EXIT COSTS
In December 2000, the Companys Board of Directors approved a restructuring program aimed at streamlining the Companys underlying cost structure to better position the Company for growth and improved operating results. During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the Company reported no additional restructuring charges. The following table sets forth the restructuring activity during the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively (in thousands).
Accrued | Accrued | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring | Restructuring | ||||||||||||||||
Costs, | Restructuring | Costs, | |||||||||||||||
Beginning of Period | Charges | Cash Paid | End of Period | ||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31,
2004
|
|||||||||||||||||
Facility exit costs
|
$ | 1,167 | $ | | $ | (188 | ) | $ | 979 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,167 | $ | | $ | (188 | ) | $ | 979 | ||||||||
9
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Accrued | Accrued | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring | Restructuring | ||||||||||||||||
Costs, | Restructuring | Costs, | |||||||||||||||
Beginning of Period | Charges | Cash Paid | End of Period | ||||||||||||||
Three months ended March 31,
2003
|
|||||||||||||||||
Facility exit costs
|
$ | 1,883 | $ | | $ | (187 | ) | $ | 1,696 | ||||||||
Severance and professional fees
|
24 | 466 | (126 | ) | 364 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,907 | $ | 466 | $ | (313 | ) | $ | 2,060 | ||||||||
Allocated to:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations
|
$ | 1,892 | $ | | $ | 1,985 | |||||||||||
Discontinued operations
|
15 | 466 | 75 | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,907 | $ | 466 | $ | 2,060 | |||||||||||
5. LINE OF CREDIT
The Company has a revolving line of credit with a bank in the amount of $15.0 million. The line of credit expires on July 1, 2005. Borrowings under the line of credit bear fixed rate interest from the date of borrowing at LIBOR plus 0.4%. All borrowings and letters of credit under the credit facility are collateralized by an equal amount of the Companys marketable securities. Borrowings under the line are subject to various covenants. As of March 31, 2004, no borrowings were outstanding under the line of credit. Standby letters of credit of approximately $104,000, which are being maintained as security for performance under various obligations, were issued and outstanding under the credit facility.
6. BUSINESS SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
The Company offers advanced Internet search technology to the public through advertiser-supported sites on the World Wide Web.
The Company provides its search technologies and services internationally both directly and through its joint venture. Attribution of revenues by geographic region is based on the country in which the customer is domiciled. Geographic information on revenues of continuing operations is as follows:
Three Months Ended | |||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | ||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
U.S.
|
$ | 24,953 | $ | 15,602 | |||||
Europe
|
13,145 | 5,982 | |||||||
Japan
|
1,131 | 1,131 | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 39,229 | $ | 22,715 | |||||
7. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On May 28, 2003, the Company entered into an agreement to sell certain assets used in the Jeeves Solutions division to Kanisa Inc. (Kanisa). The sale of such assets closed on July 1, 2003 at which time the Company ceased offering Jeeves Solutions products and services to corporate customers. The assets sold
10
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
included, among other things, tangible personal property, intellectual property and customer and business contracts.
In the third quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a gain of approximately $2.5 million, net of estimated income taxes of $109,000, representing the excess of the purchase consideration received at closing over the book value of the assets sold, as well as the remaining amount of deferred license fees applicable to Jeeves Solutions. In exchange for the sale of such assets, the Company received $3.4 million in cash at the closing and a promissory note for up to $750,000, which is payable one year from the date of closing. The amount payable under the note is currently expected to be approximately $731,000, subject to certain upward or downward adjustments, but in no event shall the amount payable under the note exceed $750,000. The proceeds, if any, from the promissory note will be recorded as an additional gain on the transaction upon receipt.
Total revenues related to the discontinued operations were $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2003. No revenue from discontinued operations was recognized during the first quarter of 2004. The results of operations have been reclassified as loss from discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for all dates and periods presented.
8. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
The components of comprehensive income are as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||
March 31, | March 31, | |||||||||
(in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 13,379 | $ | 7,691 | ||||||
Other comprehensive income:
|
||||||||||
Change in unrealized gain on investments
|
72 | (17 | ) | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
668 | (196 | ) | |||||||
Comprehensive income
|
$ | 14,119 | $ | 7,478 | ||||||
9. PENDING ACQUISITION
On March 4, 2004, the Company announced it had signed a definitive agreement to acquire Interactive Search Holdings (ISH), a privately-held online search and media company. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company will issue 9.3 million shares of common stock and stock options, and pay $150.0 million in cash to complete the acquisition. The Company may pay up to an additional $17.5 million in cash based on various factors including ISHs operating performance. The transaction is subject to certain closing conditions including regulatory approval.
11
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. All statements in the following discussion that are not reports of historical information or descriptions of current accounting policy are forward-looking statements. Please consider our forward-looking statements in light of the risks referred to in this reports introductory cautionary note.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
We offer advanced Internet search technology to the public through advertiser-supported sites on the World Wide Web (which is known as the Web). We seek to attract Web traffic by creating a distinctive search experience that users will find more intuitive and satisfying than other search alternatives. On our flagship Web sites, Ask.com in the U.S. and Ask.co.uk in the U.K., users submit their search requests, and our proprietary algorithmic search technology, Teoma, delivers a results list of Web pages likely to contain relevant and authoritative answers. The results page also displays advertiser-sponsored links to related products and services known as paid listings.
We operate four proprietary Web sites dedicated to search: Ask.com, Ask.co.uk, Teoma.com and AJKids.com. We also deliver, or syndicate, our search technology and advertising products to approximately 38 third-party Web sites as of March 31, 2004, including portals, infomediaries, and content and destination Web sites. We provide search results and/or advertising for those Web sites to display in response to their users search queries. We refer to these third-party Web sites as our syndication network.
Our focus is on increasing our Web traffic (i.e., the number of search queries on our proprietary Web sites) by attracting more users and getting them to use our search services more frequently. We generate advertising revenue every time users click on the paid listings, or as a result of graphic advertising and other advertising products we deliver in response to their queries. In this way, we monetize a portion of our Web traffic. Some of the advertisements are sold by our direct sales force while others are supplied to us by our paid listings provider, which currently is Google, Inc. We also earn revenue by licensing our search technology to our Japanese joint venture and to some of the sites in our syndication network.
Recent Events
On March 4, 2004, we announced that we had signed a definitive agreement to acquire privately-held Interactive Search Holdings, Inc. Under the terms of the agreement, we will issue 9.3 million shares of common stock and options and pay $150.0 million in cash, reflecting an aggregate purchase price of $343.0 million based on our closing price on March 3, 2004. We may pay up to an additional $17.5 million in cash based on various factors including Interactive Search Holdings operating performance. We believe that this acquisition will result in a number of benefits, including the following:
| improving our ability to generate revenue by increasing web traffic volumes and market share; | |
| increasing the financial returns to stockholders; | |
| increasing the amount of resources available to invest in technology, site experiences and marketing; and | |
| benefits arising from the complementary nature of each companys product offerings and the ability to offer multiple brands with different search experiences and applications. |
Following completion of the acquisition, Interactive Search Holdings will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ask Jeeves and its operations will remain in Irvington, New York. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions, including regulatory approval. It is expected the transaction will be completed in mid-May.
12
Critical Accounting Policies
Our condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which are known as GAAP. These accounting principles require us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments and assumptions upon which we rely are reasonable based upon information available to us at the time that these estimates, judgments and assumptions were made. These estimates, judgments and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates, judgments or assumptions and actual results, our financial statements will be affected. Our accounting policies that we believe are the most critical to a full understanding and evaluation of our reported financial results include those relating to:
| revenue; | |
| allowances for doubtful accounts; | |
| legal contingencies; and | |
| accounting for income taxes. |
Each of these critical accounting policies is described in more detail below.
In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not require managements judgment in its application. There are also cases which require managements judgment in selecting among available alternatives but none of the alternatives would produce a materially different result. Our management has reviewed these critical accounting policies and related disclosures with our Audit Committee. See the Notes to our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which contain additional information regarding our accounting policies and other disclosures required by GAAP.
Revenue-Continuing Operations
We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. If we have doubt about the collectibility of revenue at the time it is earned, such revenue is deferred until cash has been received. Revenues are generated from four general sources:
| sales of premier listings and other paid placement products; | |
| sales of branded advertising products; | |
| sales of paid inclusion products; and | |
| licensing of our search technologies. |
Our premier listings and other paid placement products are textual, or Web links, that are designed to connect users interested in a particular product or service with an advertiser offering that product or service at the exact moment users need the information, much like a Yellow Pages listing. With these products, advertisers pay only for performance, so these revenues are generated when a user clicks on the link to the advertisers Web site on a cost per click, or CPC, basis. We recognize CPC revenue on a revenue-sharing basis if the paid placement was procured from our third-party provider.
Our branded advertising ranges from highly targeted graphic units, which we offer as our Branded Response product, to traditional advertising units such as banners, towers and interstitials, which appear primarily on our syndicated sites. Branded advertising is generally sold on a cost per impression, or CPM, basis with the revenue derived from such arrangements recognized during the period that the service is provided, provided that no significant obligations remain outstanding from us to the advertiser at the end of the period. Our obligations typically include a guaranteed minimum number of impressions or times that an advertisement appears in pages viewed by users of our online properties. To the extent the minimum
13
Our paid inclusion products provide an opportunity for Web sites to ensure that they are included in our search index. We recognize paid inclusion revenue in two ways. First, on a per URL basis, in which the revenues are collected in advance and recognized over the appropriate service period, which is typically one year; and second on a CPC basis, in which the revenue is recognized when the click is delivered. We plan to discontinue sales of our CPC-based product.
License payments received from our Japanese joint venture were initially recorded as deferred revenue and are recognized as revenues on a straight-line basis over a four-year period. The license revenue will terminate during the third quarter of 2004.
Our syndication services include the sale of advertising and paid placement products, and the licensing of our search technology to third-party Web sites. Syndication license fees primarily arise from revenue-sharing arrangements, fixed fee arrangements or fee-per-use arrangements, and revenues are recognized as the service is delivered. We allocate our syndication revenues among three of our revenue categories, paid placement, branded advertising, and paid inclusion, as applicable, when reporting our results. Revenues from revenue-sharing arrangements are recorded gross, including amounts paid to syndication partners, in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 99-19, because we act as the primary obligor in the arrangement, perform a significant portion of the service, have latitude in establishing pricing and bear credit risk.
Allowances for Doubtful Accounts
We make judgments as to our ability to collect outstanding receivables and provide allowances for the portion of receivables when collection becomes doubtful. Provisions are made based upon a specific review of all significant outstanding invoices. For those invoices not specifically reviewed, provisions are provided at differing rates, based upon the age of the receivable. In determining these percentages, we analyze our historical collection experience and current economic trends. If the historical data we use to calculate the allowance provided for doubtful accounts does not reflect the future ability to collect outstanding receivables, additional provisions for doubtful accounts may be needed and our future results of operations could be adversely impacted.
We also record a provision for revenue adjustments in the same period as the related revenues are recorded. These estimates are based on historical analysis of credit memo data and other factors. If the historical data we use to calculate these estimates does not properly reflect future uncollectible revenue, then a change in the allowances would be made in the period in which such a determination is made and revenues in that period could be impacted.
Legal Contingencies
We are currently involved in various claims and legal proceedings. Periodically, we review the status of each significant matter and assess our potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be estimated, we accrue a liability for the estimated loss. Because of uncertainties related to these matters, accruals are based only on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we reassess the potential liability related to our pending claims and litigation and may revise our estimates. Such revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material impact on our results of operations and financial position. See Note 2 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of our material legal proceedings.
Income Taxes
We use significant judgment in determining our consolidated income tax provision. Uncertainties may arise with respect to the tax treatment of certain transactions, transfer pricing arrangements among related
14
Due to uncertainty surrounding when or if we will realize the benefits of our deferred tax assets (primarily from our net operating loss carryforwards), we have recorded a 100% valuation allowance on such amounts. Any decrease in the valuation allowance could materially reduce our income tax provision in the period in which such determination is made.
We provide for United States income taxes on the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries unless they are considered indefinitely invested outside the United States. At March 31, 2004, the cumulative earnings upon which United States income taxes have not been provided are approximately $22.8 million. The income tax that would arise if these items were repatriated is approximately $9.1 million, some or all of which may be reduced by NOLs or foreign tax credits.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
On May 28, 2003, we entered into an agreement to sell certain assets used in our Jeeves Solutions division to Kanisa Inc. (Kanisa). The sale of these assets closed on July 1, 2003, at which time we ceased offering Jeeves Solutions products and services to corporate customers. Accordingly, the results of operations presented below are on a continuing operations basis, and the results of the Jeeves solutions division are discussed in the section entitled Discontinued Operations.
Revenues
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2004 | Change | 2003 | |||||||||
Revenue
|
$ | 39,229 | 72.7 | % | $ | 22,715 |
Total revenues for the first quarter of 2004 grew 72.7% as compared with the first quarter of 2003. Generally, revenues were favorably affected by usage of our Web sites, which we refer to as our Web traffic. Traffic to our proprietary sites was strong, with queries growing 42% as compared with the first quarter of 2003. Contributing to the growth in queries, both unique users and average user site visit frequency per month increased, with unique users rising 20% and frequency increasing 14% when compared to the same period of 2003.
Our revenues are related to our Internet search services and to our syndication of Web search services to third party Web sites. Our revenues consist of four main categories: (1) sales of paid placement products; (2) sales of branded advertising products; (3) paid inclusion products; and (4) licensing. Syndication revenues are included within each of the above categories, as applicable. The table below presents revenues for each category, split between the U.S., Europe and Japan.
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2004 | Change | 2003 | ||||||||||
Paid Placement:
|
|||||||||||||
U.S.
|
$ | 20,489 | 82.8 | % | $ | 11,209 | |||||||
Europe
|
10,672 | 158.2 | % | 4,133 | |||||||||
Total Paid Placement
|
31,161 | 103.1 | % | 15,342 | |||||||||
Branded Advertising:
|
|||||||||||||
U.S.
|
3,811 | (3.2 | )% | 3,936 | |||||||||
Europe
|
2,255 | 22.2 | % | 1,845 | |||||||||
Total Branded Advertising
|
6,066 | 4.9 | % | 5,781 |
15
Three Months Ended March 31, | |||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2004 | Change | 2003 | ||||||||||
Paid Inclusion:
|
|||||||||||||
U.S.
|
653 | 42.9 | % | 457 | |||||||||
Europe
|
218 | 5,350.0 | % | 4 | |||||||||
Total Paid Inclusion
|
871 | 88.9 | % | 461 | |||||||||
Licensing:
|
|||||||||||||
Japan
|
1,131 | | 1,131 | ||||||||||
Total Licensing
|
1,131 | | 1,131 | ||||||||||
Total Revenues
|
$ | 39,229 | 72.7 | % | $ | 22,715 | |||||||
Total:
|
|||||||||||||
U.S.
|
$ | 24,953 | 59.9 | % | $ | 15,602 | |||||||
Europe
|
13,145 | 119.7 | % | 5,982 | |||||||||
Japan
|
1,131 | | 1,131 | ||||||||||
Total Revenues
|
$ | 39,229 | 72.7 | % | $ | 22,715 | |||||||
Paid placement revenues in the first quarter of 2004 grew significantly over the first quarter of 2003. Relative to 2003, paid placement increased primarily due to overall increases in traffic to our Web sites. Additionally, paid placement revenues in the first quarter of 2004 benefited from improvements in the percentage of queries covered by paid placement advertisers as well as from improved performance by a new paid placement contract in the U.K., which we signed in May 2003.
Branded advertising revenues increased modestly company-wide, with an increase in the U.K. partially offset by a slight decline in the U.S. Advertising sales in the U.S. were impacted by efforts to improve our site experience, which has resulted in decreases in the frequency with which we display ads to users. Partially offsetting this is an increase in the amount we receive for those ads that are displayed, as they are typically more targeted, and thus more valuable, to our advertisers. Advertising sales in the U.K. benefited from increases to both volume and pricing for the Branded Response product, as compared with the similar period in 2003.
Revenues from paid inclusion grew as compared with the first quarter of 2003 when it had been recently launched.
License revenues relate primarily to a technology license to our Japanese joint venture and are recognized ratably over the estimated service period applicable to this arrangement. Consequently, we expect to record approximately $1.1 million related to this license in the second quarter of 2004. The amortization period of this license ends during the third quarter of 2004.
For the second quarter of 2004, we expect that a seasonal decrease in Web traffic will result in revenues that are slightly lower than those of the first quarter. We believe that our traffic generally corresponds with overall Internet usage, which historically has declined slightly in the second and third quarters during the summer months and returned in the fourth quarter. Additionally, we intend to continue to seek increased Web traffic by increasing our marketing efforts and by improving the relevance of our search results and, thereby, increasing user satisfaction and usage.
Gross Margin
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2004 | Change | 2003 | |||||||||
Gross Profit
|
$ | 33,159 | 92.8 | % | $ | 17,199 | ||||||
Gross Margin
|
84.5 | % | 75.7 | % |
16
Cost of revenues consists primarily of costs related to traffic acquisition for our syndicated sites and the delivery of our search results. Costs to acquire traffic for our syndicated sites include revenue-based payments and similar arrangements with third-parties who direct traffic to those sites. Costs related to delivering our search results include depreciation of Web site equipment, hosting and ad server management, salaries and related personnel costs and amortization charges related to technology acquired in some of our business combinations.
Gross margin percentage increased in the first quarter of 2004 as percentage increases in revenues exceeded percentage increases in cost of revenues. On a dollar basis, cost of revenues increased $554,000 to $6.1 million in the first quarter of 2004 as compared with the first quarter of 2003, reflecting increased traffic acquisition costs associated with the higher levels of traffic.
We expect gross margin in the second quarter of 2004 to be similar to the first quarter of 2004.
Operating Expenses
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2004 | Change | 2003 | |||||||||
Product development
|
$ | 4,753 | 34.1 | % | $ | 3,544 | ||||||
Percentage of total revenues
|
12.1 | % | 15.6 | % | ||||||||
Sales and marketing
|
$ | 9,164 | 33.0 | % | $ | 6,891 | ||||||
Percentage of total revenues
|
23.4 | % | 30.3 | % | ||||||||
General and administrative
|
$ | 5,344 | 24.8 | % | $ | 4,281 | ||||||
Percentage of total revenues
|
13.6 | % | 18.8 | % |
Product Development Expenses
Product development expenses consist primarily of salaries and related personnel costs, consultant fees and expenses related to the design, development, testing and enhancement of our technology and services. To date, all software development costs have been expensed as incurred.
Product development expenses increased on a dollar basis in the first quarter of 2004 as compared with the first quarter of 2003 due to increases in compensation and compensation-related expenses as we grew our research and development team in order to expand our Teoma technology and add new features on our Web sites.
We expect product development expenses to increase on a dollar and percentage basis in the second quarter of 2004 as we continue to invest in our Teoma technology and new features on our Web sites.
Sales and Marketing Expenses
Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of advertising, promotional and public relations expenditures, as well as salaries, commissions and related personnel expenses of our sales force.
Sales and marketing spending increased on a dollar basis as compared with the corresponding period in 2003 due to increasing advertising costs, but fell as a percentage of total revenues due to faster revenue growth. Our marketing campaigns were focused on promoting both branding and traffic generation.
We expect sales and marketing expenses in the second quarter of 2004 to increase, both on a dollar basis and as a percentage of revenues, relative to the first quarter of 2004 as we plan to invest in marketing across all of our product lines.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist of costs for general corporate functions, as well as depreciation and other facilities charges. Also included is the provision for doubtful accounts, various
17
The increase in general and administrative expenses in the first quarter of 2004 reflects an increase in salaries, employee-related benefits and incentive compensation as we expanded headcount to manage the growing business, and rewarded employees for the companys performance. However, as a percentage of total revenue, general and administrative expenses have decreased as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2004.
We expect general and administrative expenses in the second quarter of 2004 to be consistent with the first quarter.
Three Months Ended March 31, | ||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | 2004 | Change | 2003 | |||||||||
Gain on acquisition of joint venture
|
$ | | (100.0 | )% | $ | 6,124 | ||||||
Interest and other income, net
|
$ | 581 | 222.8 | % | $ | 180 | ||||||
Income tax provision
|
$ | 1,100 | 228.4 | % | $ | 335 | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations
|
$ | | 100.0 | % | $ | (761 | ) |
Gain on Acquisition of Joint Venture
During 2003, we recognized a gain of $6.1 million representing the fair value of net assets we recorded in excess of the consideration paid upon the acquisition of the remaining outstanding equity interests in our joint venture, Ask Jeeves U.K. This amount had been deferred due to a contingent payment obligation in our agreement with our former partners.
Interest and Other Income, net
Interest income relates primarily to interest earned on fixed income securities and correlates with the average balance of those investments and prevailing interest rates. Interest expense arises primarily from interest accruing on outstanding borrowings under our line of credit and under our capital lease.
Interest income was $442,000 and $269,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003 respectively. Interest income increased as our average balance of funds held in interest-earning investments increased. Net proceeds from the sale of the convertible subordinated notes are being held in marketable securities. Subsequently, our realized gains and losses on investments increased $129,000 for the first quarter of 2004 compared to the same period in 2003.
Interest expense was $3,000 and $82,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2004 and 2003. During 2003 we repaid the outstanding borrowings under our line of credit, and paid off the remaining obligation under our capital lease. As a result, interest expense decreased.
Income Tax Provision
We recorded an income tax provision in the amount of $1.1 million in the first quarter of 2004 relating primarily to income from our international operations. The provision differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal rate principally due to federal net operating loss carryforwards for which no tax benefit is provided, and foreign income taxed at rates below the federal statutory rate. The tax provision is based upon our estimate of the full year effective rate for the Company. The provision increased from the first quarter of 2003 due to an increase in taxable income in our international operations.
Loss from Discontinued Operations
On July 1, 2003, we completed the sale of certain assets used in our Jeeves Solutions division to Kanisa, Inc. pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement dated May 28, 2003, by and between us and Kanisa. Accordingly, the results of operations relating to this division are presented in our Statements of Operations as discontinued operations.
18
During the first quarter of 2004, we did not record a loss on the discontinued operation, as the Jeeves Solutions division was sold as of July 1, 2003. In the first quarter of 2003, we recorded a loss of $761,000.
Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations In Operating Results
Our operating results may fluctuate significantly in the future as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are beyond our control. Factors that may adversely affect our results of operations include:
| our ability to attract and retain advertisers and our ability to link our partners to potential customers; | |
| the number of queries on our Web sites; | |
| our ability to effectively manage our advertising inventory; | |
| rate changes for advertising on our Web sites; | |
| marketing expenses and technology infrastructure costs as well as other costs that we may incur as we expand our operation; | |
| seasonal and other fluctuations in demand for our services and for advertising space on our Web sites; | |
| our ability to develop and introduce new technology; | |
| announcements and new technology introductions by our competitors; | |
| our ability to attract and retain key personnel; and | |
| costs relating to possible acquisitions and integration of technologies or businesses; |
Because of the foregoing factors, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results should not be relied upon as an indicator of our future performance.
As Internet advertising continues the transition from an emerging to a more developed market, seasonal and cyclical patterns may develop in our industry that may also affect our revenues. Similar to traditional media, this may result in our advertising sales being lower during the summer vacation period. Additionally, the seasonality of traffic on our proprietary sites corresponds with overall Internet usage. This may result in lower usage during holidays and the summer vacation period, as fewer people use the Internet. Seasonality in the retail industry and in Internet service usage is likely to cause quarterly fluctuations in our results of operations and could harm our business.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
March 31, | December 31, | ||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
193,690 | 180,648 | |||||||
Percentage of total assets
|
83.3 | % | 85.1 | % | |||||
Current ratio*
|
9.6 | 10.7 | |||||||
Days sales outstanding
|
33 | 41 |
* | Calculated excluding deferred revenue |
Three Months | ||||||||
Ended March 31, | ||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
Cash provided by operating activities
|
13,952 | 5,377 | ||||||
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
12,870 | (2,493 | ) | |||||
Cash provided by financing activities
|
3,536 | 1,547 |
As of March 31, 2004, we had $193.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, and marketable securities, an increase of $13.0 million compared to the fiscal 2003 year end. Of this amount, $67.7 million was
19
Net cash provided by investing activities of $12.9 million resulted primarily from the proceeds from the redemption of marketable securities of $18.1 million. Partially offsetting these proceeds were investments in capital expenditures of $5.2 million.
Net cash provided by financing activities of $3.5 million resulted from our issuance of common stock, primarily from the exercise of stock options.
We have a revolving line of credit with a bank in the amount of $15.0 million. The line of credit expires on July 1, 2005. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at LIBOR plus 0.4%. All borrowings and letters of credit are collateralized by an equal amount of our marketable securities. The line of credit agreement contains various covenants. As of March 31, 2004, no borrowings were outstanding. Standby letters of credit of approximately $104,000 were issued and outstanding under the line of credit, which are being maintained as security for performance under lease obligations. Should we choose not to renew the line of credit, we do not believe our business would be harmed.
In June 2003, we issued $115.0 million aggregate principal amount of zero coupon convertible subordinated notes, due June 1, 2008. The notes were sold at face value and our net proceeds were $111.5 million, net of costs of issuance of $3.5 million. We issued the notes for general corporate purposes, including potential future acquisitions. The notes are convertible by the holders into shares of our common stock at any time at a conversion price of $16.90 per share subject to certain adjustments. This is equivalent to a conversion rate of approximately 59.1716 shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes. Upon conversion, we have the right, subject to certain conditions, to deliver cash (or a combination of cash and shares) in lieu of shares of its common stock. The notes are subordinated in right of payment to all existing and future senior indebtedness, as defined in the indenture. The holders of the notes may require us to repurchase all or a portion of the notes, subject to specified exceptions, upon the occurrence of a change in control. We may choose to pay the repurchase price in cash, shares of its common stock, shares of the surviving corporation or a combination thereof. We may not redeem the notes prior to the maturity date.
Our existing cash and marketable securities balances may decline during 2004 in the event of a weakening in our business, changes in our planned cash outlays, as well as our acquisition of ISH. However, based upon our current business plan and revenue prospects, we anticipate that our existing cash and marketable securities will be sufficient to fund our anticipated needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next twelve months. Cash from operations could be affected by various risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to the risks detailed in the section Risk Factors. Additionally, cash and marketable securities balances may be used to fund strategic acquisitions of other companies, products or technologies that are complimentary to our business.
On an ongoing basis, we will need to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our anticipated needs for working capital and capital expenditures, and repayment of our convertible notes if not converted into stock, or we will need to raise additional capital. However, if we are not successful in generating sufficient cash flow from operations or in raising additional capital when required in sufficient amounts and on terms acceptable to us, these failures could seriously harm our business. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our existing stockholders will be reduced.
20
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of March 31, 2004, our only unconsolidated subsidiary is Ask Jeeves Japan, which generally provides Ask Jeeves services within a defined geographic region. We do not have majority voting rights or majority residual interests in the assets or income of any off balance sheet entities, including Ask Jeeves Japan. Further, we have not guaranteed any obligations of unconsolidated entities nor do we have any commitment or intent to provide additional funding to any such entities. Accordingly, we are not materially exposed to any market, credit, liquidity or financing risk that could arise from engaging in such relationships.
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Contractual Obligations, Contingent Liabilities and Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at March 31, 2004, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods:
Less than | |||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | Total | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | Thereafter | ||||||||||||||||
Convertible subordinated notes*
|
$ | 115,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | 115,000 | $ | | |||||||||||
Non-cancelable operating leases
|
7,653 | 3,657 | 1,733 | 1,512 | 751 | ||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 122,653 | $ | 3,657 | $ | 1,733 | $ | 116,512 | $ | 751 | |||||||||||
* | The notes are convertible at any time prior to maturity into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $16.90 per share, subject to certain adjustments. In the event of such conversion, we will have the right to deliver cash (or a combination of cash and shares of common stock) in lieu of shares of our common stock. |
21
RISK FACTORS
Included below are other risk factors that may affect our future operating results.
Risks Related to our Company
Rapid industry change might affect our profitability.
Although we first became profitable in the fourth quarter of 2002, and have remained profitable since that time, we cannot assure that we will remain profitable or cash flow positive. Moreover, we might not be able to increase our operating profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. The Internet industry is rapidly evolving and very turbulent. Rapid change may result in our being unable to forecast our results accurately or may cause our profitability to decline significantly. To increase profits, we will need to generate revenue growth from our advertising sales while continuing to control our expenses. We face the risk that our costs might increase substantially in the future. Indeed, we believe it is critical that we continue to expend financial and management resources to develop our brand loyalty through marketing and promotion, to enhance our search technologies and to expand our other services. If we fail to attract Web traffic or control costs, our annual net losses could resume, in which case we would eventually need to obtain additional financing or cease operations.
We derive a significant percentage of our revenue from our paid placement arrangement with Google, Inc.
In July 2002, we entered into an agreement with Google, Inc., to participate in its sponsored links program, and our participation began in September 2002. Under this agreement, Google sells paid placements to tens of thousands of advertisers and we display their paid placements on our U.S. Web properties. We also syndicate Googles paid placements, together with our search results, to third-party Web sites in our syndication network. In exchange for making our Web traffic available to Googles advertisers, we share in the revenue generated from those advertisers. In the second quarter of 2003, the Ask Jeeves UK Partnership, our U.K. subsidiary, entered into an agreement with a Google subsidiary to display Googles paid placements on our U.K. Web site, replacing a previous paid placement provider. For the three months ended March 31, 2004, our combined paid listings revenues from Google comprised 69% of our revenues from continuing operations. Our U.S. agreement with Google is scheduled to terminate in September 2005 (but allows for termination for convenience by either party during September or October of 2004), and our U.K. agreement with Google is scheduled to terminate in May 2005.
If our contracts with Google are not renewed, or if Google fails to perform under these contracts or if they are terminated for any other reason, we would need to find another suitable paid placement provider or otherwise replace the lost revenues. Although alternate paid placement providers (such as Yahoo! Inc. and Espotting Media/ FindWhat.com) are currently available in the market, the paid placement market is consolidating, (for example, Espotting Media is merging with FindWhat.com), and we face the risk that we might be unable to negotiate equally advantageous terms with such providers. Further, if Googles performance under these contracts unexpectedly deteriorates or our ability to generate traffic for paid placements decreases, our results of operations could be harmed.
Web-based business models are still evolving.
Our advertising revenue will depend on our ability to achieve, measure and demonstrate to advertisers the breadth of Web traffic using our search service and the value of our targeted advertising. Currently, there are a variety of pricing models for selling advertising on the Internet, including models based on the number of impressions delivered, the number of click-throughs by users, the duration over which the advertisement is displayed or the number of keywords to which the advertisement is linked. It is still difficult to predict which pricing model, if any, will emerge as the industry standard. In addition, technological changes could impact the success of particular business models. Finally, we are constantly optimizing and changing the advertising implementation on our Web sites, which may reduce our advertising revenue. This uncertainty makes it
22
We rely on DoubleClick for third-party advertising delivery.
We rely on third-party advertising services, provided by DoubleClick, Inc. to deliver advertisements to our users. DoubleClick is currently the only provider available in the market that meets our delivery needs. If DoubleClick fails to deliver advertisements as contracted for, due to reliability or performance problems, or if advertisements cannot be targeted as promised to advertisers, our revenues may decrease.
Both the U.S. and Europe DoubleClick, Inc. agreements will expire on February 27, 2007.
If we cannot maintain the popularity of our search engine among Internet users, our business will fail.
We will be successful only if a critical mass of Internet users adopt our search technologies and services as a method of navigating the Internet. Internet users have a variety of other search techniques, including other search engines and subject-matter directories, available to them to find information on the Web. Users can also use non-Web-based methods of obtaining information through the Internet, including chat rooms and e-mail, rather than browsing through Web sites. Our search technologies, including our Teoma technology, are novel. It is difficult to predict the rate at which users will sample our services and the extent to which they will adopt them as their search technology. Even in the case of repeat users, it is difficult to know whether they return to our Web sites because they are satisfied with our offerings or because they are dissatisfied with the alternatives. At any time, users of our services might revert to prior search techniques or choose new search techniques altogether. We cannot assure you that widespread acceptance of our search technologies and services will occur. If we cannot maintain the popularity of our search engine among Internet users, our business plan will fail.
If high quality, third-party data ceases to be available, or directly accessible, on the Web, our business might fail.
Our Internet search services are designed to directly link users to a page within a third-party Web site that contains an answer to the users question. We have little control over the content of these third-party Web sites. If these third-party Web sites do not contain high-quality, up-to-date information, the utility of our service to the user will be reduced. In addition, when our search engine attempts to direct the user to a page within a third-party companys Web site, the company administering the site sometimes automatically redirects users to that companys own home page. If third-party companies prevent us from directly linking our users to pages within their Web sites, and if there are no comparable alternative Web sites to which we can direct our users, the utility and attractiveness of our services to users will be reduced. If the utility of our services diminishes for either of the above reasons, traffic on our Web sites will likely fall, which would reduce our ability to charge for advertising and premium listings.
If we fail to compete effectively against our current and potential competitors, we will lose market share.
We compete in markets that are intensely competitive and rapidly changing. Many of our competitors are bringing new search technologies to market, allocating extensive resources to product development and marketing and expanding their search offerings. We compete with search destinations, portals, and search technology providers.
| Search Destinations and Portals. In our efforts to attract search engine users, we compete against search destinations and portals such as Google, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., America Online (AOL) and Microsoft Network (MSN), and other smaller companies. | |
| Search Technology Providers. We also compete with search technology providers such as Google, Inc., Yahoo! Inc., and other smaller companies. |
23
Some of our existing competitors (as well as potential new competitors), have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial resources than we do. Moreover, vertical integration appears to be increasing in the Internet search and advertising industry. For example, in 2003, Yahoo! acquired Inktomi and other search technology providers, and Overture Inc., a provider of search services, paid placements and related advertising. Vertically integrated search providers, like Yahoo! Inc. and Google, Inc., might have greater resources and functionality, and might be able to inhibit our access to advertisers or end users.
We face the risk that operating system companies, ISPs or broadband providers may block or inhibit our ability to connect with our end users. If our competitors successfully divert search users away from our Web sites, we might lose market share.
Our growth will depend on our ability to attract and retain new users through effective promotional campaigns.
We believe that favorable consumer and business community perceptions of the Ask Jeeves brands are essential to our future success. Accordingly, we intend to continue pursuing brand-enhancement strategies, which may include mass market and multimedia advertising, promotional programs and public relations activities. As with any public awareness campaign, we face the risk that our expenditures might not lead to the desired result; that is we might experience no net increase in our brand recognition or brand loyalty, our number of new users, or our Web site traffic. Furthermore, even if such increases occur, they might not be sufficiently large to justify the expenditures. If we are unable to promote brand awareness and loyalty in a cost-effective manner, we are unlikely to attract new users and our existing user base might shrink through attrition.
If we are unable to develop new products and new product enhancements rapidly and successfully, as well as to integrate acquired technologies, we might be unable to maintain user satisfaction.
In the highly competitive, consolidating, and rapidly changing Internet search environment, our future success depends in large part on our ability to develop or acquire and introduce new search technology that meets the needs of our users more rapidly than our competitors, several of which are larger and may have significantly greater resources available for such investment in technology. For example, in 2001 we acquired Teoma Technologies, Inc. and in 2002 we acquired technology from Octopus Software, Inc. If we are unable to rapidly and successfully develop, acquire, or integrate new technology into the search services we offer, we might lose market share to our faster competitors and never recoup our development or acquisition costs.
Our pending acquisition of Interactive Search Holdings and any future acquisitions may disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value, divert management attention or be difficult to integrate.
We have announced the pending acquisition of Interactive Search Holdings (ISH), which is expected to close in mid-May. This acquisition is expected to nearly double the size of the company. The integration of this operation might disrupt our internal operations or otherwise require the focus of management, which could negatively affect other corporate initiatives. We may in the future seek to acquire or invest in additional businesses, products or technologies that we believe could complement or expand our business, augment our market coverage, enhance our technical capabilities or that may otherwise offer growth opportunities. In addition, we may spend significant management time and costs in dealing with acquisitions that do not come to fruition. However, in doing so, we may encounter problems with the assimilation of ISH and other acquired businesses, products or technologies including:
| difficulties in assimilation of acquired personnel, systems, operations, technologies or products; | |
| adverse effects on our current employees and the inability to retain employees of acquired companies; | |
| unanticipated costs associated with acquisitions; | |
| diversion of managements attention from other business concerns and potential disruption of our ongoing business; |
24
| adverse effects on our existing business relationships with our customers; | |
| potential patent or trademark infringement from acquired technologies; | |
| use of substantial portions of our available cash as all or a portion of the purchase price; and | |
| dilution of our current stockholders due to issuances of additional securities as consideration for acquisitions. |
If we are unable to integrate ISH or future acquired companies successfully or to create new or enhanced services, we might not achieve the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions. If we fail to achieve the anticipated benefits from the acquisitions, we might incur increased expenses and experience a shortfall in our anticipated revenues and we might not obtain a satisfactory return on our investment. In addition, if a significant number of employees of acquired companies fail to remain employed with us, we may experience difficulties in achieving the expected benefits of the acquisitions.
If we fail to maintain effective internal financial and managerial systems, controls and procedures, our results of operations may be harmed.
Our past business realignment and reductions in workforce placed a significant strain on our managerial staff, financial controls and operational resources as our employees have assumed greater responsibilities and learned to manage their increased workload with reduced resources. We continue to evaluate our operational and financial systems and our managerial controls and procedures to determine what additional changes, if any, might help us to manage our current operations better. We face the risk that our systems, procedures and controls might not be adequate to support our operations or to maintain accountability for our assets. Any such failure could harm our results of operations.
Our international operations expose us to additional risks and additional international expansion efforts might lose money.
The Company operates a separate Web site, located in Dublin, Ireland, that provides Internet search services to its customers in the United Kingdom, Ireland and elsewhere in Europe. In addition, we hold a 47% interest in Ask Jeeves Japan, a joint venture selling our Answers software product, as well as seeking to launch a Japanese language search site with Japan-specific content. As part of our corporate restructuring in 2001, we terminated our participation in projects seeking to launch versions of our search sites for Spanish speaking and Australian users. Any further expansion into international markets would require substantial management attention and financial resources. Establishing foreign operations is a significant investment that might not produce desired returns.
Like our current foreign operations, any future expansion efforts would be subject to risks associated with international operations, including:
| the impact of business cycles and downturns in economies outside the United States; | |
| longer payment cycles and greater difficulty in accounts receivable collections; | |
| time and resources required to comply with foreign regulatory requirements; | |
| unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; | |
| difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations; | |
| potential tax liabilities if our transfer-pricing practices are successfully challenged by the tax authorities of the nations in which we operate; | |
| reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; | |
| unanticipated tax costs associated with the cross-border use of intangible assets; | |
| political and economic instability; |
25
| fluctuations in currency exchange rates; | |
| difficulty in maintaining effective communications with employees and customers due to distance, language and cultural barriers; | |
| lower brand recognition for Ask Jeeves and the Jeeves character in non-English speaking countries; | |
| lower per capita Internet usage in many foreign countries, for a variety of reasons including lower disposable incomes, lack of adequate telecommunications and computer infrastructure and concerns regarding online security for e-commerce transactions; and | |
| competition in international markets from a broad range of competitors. |
Legal actions may be initiated against us seeking to hold us liable for our links to third-party Web sites.
Our Internet search services are designed to link users directly to a page within a third-party Web site that contains a response to a users query. These direct links might expose us to legal actions seeking to hold us liable for the content of those third-party Web sites. These actions might claim, for example, that we should be liable for copyright or trademark infringement or other unauthorized actions by the third-party Web site. Other claims may be based on errors or false or misleading information provided through our Web sites, including information deemed to constitute professional advice including legal, medical, financial or investment advice. Other claims may be based on our links to sexually explicit Web sites and our provision of sexually explicit advertisements when this content is displayed. We do not believe that any such claim would have legal merit, but defending against such a legal action could be expensive and distract management. Implementing measures to reduce our exposure to such claims may require us to spend substantial resources and limit the attractiveness of our service to users.
Risks Related to Operating in our Industry
The operating performance of computer systems and Web servers is critical to our business and reputation.
Any system failure, including network, software or hardware failure due to a computer virus or otherwise, that causes an interruption in our service or a decrease in our responsiveness could result in reduced user traffic on our Web sites and reduced revenues for our business. We have network and server equipment located at Metromedia Fiber Network in California and England, Worldcom in Massachusetts, Cable & Wireless Communications in England, and Esat Telecommunications Ltd., in Dublin, Ireland. Although we believe that our current back-up methods are adequate, we face the risk that our back-up servers might fail or might cause an interruption in our service.
We have experienced slower response times and interruptions in service due to malfunction at our hosting facilities and on the Internet backbone networks, major software upgrades on our Web sites and undetected software defects. These Web site interruptions have lasted for periods ranging from a few minutes to three hours. In addition, our Web sites also could be affected by computer viruses, electronic break-ins or other similar disruptions. If we experience outages, frequent or persistent system failures or degraded response times, user satisfaction would decrease, we would likely lose advertising revenues and our reputation and brands could be permanently harmed.
Our users depend on Internet service providers, online service providers and other Web site operators for access to our Web sites. Each of these types of providers has experienced significant outages in the past and could experience outages, delays and other operating difficulties due to system failures unrelated to our systems.
The occurrence of an earthquake or other natural disaster or unanticipated problem at our principal facilities or at the servers that host or backup our systems could cause interruptions or delays in our interactive network or a loss of data. Our systems are vulnerable to damage or interruption from fire, flood,
26
Our long-term success depends upon the growth and acceptance of Internet advertising as an effective alternative to traditional advertising media.
We compete with traditional media including television, radio and print, in addition to other high-traffic Web sites, for a share of advertisers total advertising expenditures. We face the risk that advertisers might find Internet advertising to be less effective than traditional media at promoting their products or services and may further reduce or eliminate their expenditures on Internet advertising. Many potential advertisers and advertising agencies have only limited experience advertising on the Internet and have not devoted a significant portion of their advertising expenditures to Internet advertising. Acceptance of the Internet among advertisers will depend, to a large extent, on the perceived effectiveness of Internet advertising and the continued growth of commercial usage of the Internet. Filter software programs that limit or prevent advertising from being displayed on a users computer are available. It is unclear whether this type of software will become widely accepted, but if it does, it would negatively affect Internet-based advertising. Our business could be seriously harmed if the market for Internet advertising does not continue to grow.
A breach of our computer security could damage our reputation and deter customers from using our services.
We attempt to protect our computer systems and network from physical break-ins, security breaches and other disruptive problems caused by the Internet or other users. Computer break-ins could jeopardize the security of information stored in and transmitted through our computer systems and network, which could reduce our ability to retain or attract customers, damage our reputation or subject us to litigation. We could be subject to denial of service, vandalism and other attacks on our systems by Internet hackers. Although we intend to continue to implement security technology and establish operational procedures to prevent break-ins, damage and failures, these security measures might fail. Our insurance coverage might be insufficient to cover losses that result from such events.
If we do not adapt our search services for users of cell phones, PDAs and similar devices, we might lose market share as users increasingly use handheld devices to access the Internet.
In the coming years, the number of individuals who access the Internet through devices other than a personal computer is expected to increase. These alternative devices include personal digital assistants, known as PDAs, cellular telephones and television set-top devices. The low resolution, functionality and memory currently associated with some of these alternative devices might prevent or impede their users from accessing our graphics-rich Web services. Unless we successfully launch a version of our Web search service that is easily accessible through these alternative devices, we face a risk of losing market share if personal computer users migrate toward use of these alternative devices to access the Internet.
Our ability to remain profitable might depend on continued growth of Internet use.
Our revenue model depends in large part on the volume of Internet user traffic to our Web sites. Our business will be harmed if Internet usage does not continue to grow or grows at significantly lower rates compared to current trends. The continued growth of the Internet is subject to various risks, many of which are outside our control. These risks include the following:
| the Internet infrastructure might not be able to support the demands placed on it; | |
| performance and reliability of the Internet might decline as usage grows and disruptions caused by malicious users or hackers increases; | |
| locating useful information online might become more difficult as the number of Web sites proliferates, causing Internet usage rates to decrease or to grow at a decreasing rate; |
27
| users might hesitate to engage in online commerce because they feel insecure transmitting confidential information, such as credit card numbers, over the Internet; and | |
| users privacy concerns might lead them to reduce Internet use so as to prevent Web sites from gathering user information without the users knowledge or consent. |
Our business might suffer if any of our key executives discontinues employment with us.
Our future success depends to a large extent on the services of our key managerial employees. Although we have signed offer letters with our executives, we have not entered into formal employment agreements with them and we do not maintain key person life insurance. If we are unable to retain our executive officers or key management personnel or attract additional qualified management in the future, our business might be materially harmed.
Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain skilled technical employees.
Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled employees. Competition for employees with skills in search technology is intense. We have experienced, and we expect to continue to experience in the future, difficulty in hiring and retaining highly skilled employees with appropriate qualifications. If we fail to attract, retain and motivate highly-skilled employees, our business will be harmed.
We may face potential liability, loss of users and damage to our reputation for violation of privacy policies.
We have a policy against using personally identifiable information obtained from users of our search technologies without the users permission. In the past, the Federal Trade Commission has investigated companies that have used personally identifiable information without permission or in violation of a stated privacy policy. Under the UK Data Protection Act and the EU Data Protection Directive, a failure to ensure that personal information is accurate and secure or a transfer of personal information to a country without adequate privacy protections could result in criminal or civil penalties. If we use personally identifiable information without permission or in violation of our policy, we may face potential liability for invasion of privacy for compiling and providing information to our corporate customers and electronic commerce merchants.
Government regulation and legal uncertainties could harm our business.
Any new law or regulation pertaining to the Internet, or the application or interpretation of existing laws, could decrease the demand for our services, increase our cost of doing business or otherwise seriously harm our business. There is, and will likely continue to be, an increasing number of laws and regulations pertaining to the Internet. These laws or regulations may relate to liability for information retrieved from or transmitted over the Internet, online content regulation, user privacy, taxation and the quality of products and services. Furthermore, the growth and development of electronic commerce may prompt calls for more stringent consumer protection laws that may impose additional burdens on electronic commerce companies as well as companies like us that provide electronic commerce services.
We file tax returns in such states as required by law based on principles applicable to traditional businesses. However, one or more states could seek to impose additional income tax obligations or sales tax collection obligations on out-of-state companies, such as ours, which engage in or facilitate electronic commerce. A number of proposals have been made at state and local levels that could impose such taxes on the sale of products and services through the Internet or the income derived from such sales. Such proposals, if adopted, could substantially impair the growth of electronic commerce and seriously harm our profitability.
Legislation limiting the ability of the states to impose taxes on Internet-based transactions was enacted by the United States Congress. However, this legislation, known as the Internet Tax Freedom Act, imposed only a three-year moratorium on state and local taxes on electronic commerce, where such taxes are discriminatory, unless such taxes were generally imposed and actually enforced prior to October 1, 1998. The
28
In addition, we are not certain how our business might be affected by the application to Internet commerce of existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, copyrights, encryption and other intellectual property issues, taxation, libel, obscenity and export or import matters. The vast majority of such laws were adopted prior to the advent of the Internet. As a result, they do not contemplate or address the unique issues of the Internet and related technologies. Changes in laws intended to address such issues could create uncertainty in the Internet market. Such uncertainty could reduce demand for our services or increase the cost of doing business as a result of litigation costs or increased service delivery costs.
Several recent federal laws could have an impact on our business. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act is intended, in part, to limit the liability of eligible online service providers for listing or linking to third-party Web sites that include materials that infringe copyrights or other rights of others. The Childrens Online Protection Act and the Childrens Online Privacy Protection Act are intended to restrict the distribution of certain materials deemed harmful to children and impose additional restrictions on the ability of online services to collect user information from minors. In addition, the Protection of Children From Sexual Predators Act of 1998 requires online service providers to report evidence of violations of federal child pornography laws under certain circumstances. Such legislation may impose significant additional costs on our business or subject us to additional liabilities.
Due to the nature of the Web, it is possible that the governments of other states and foreign countries might attempt to regulate Web transmissions or prosecute us for violations of their laws. We might unintentionally violate such laws, such laws might be modified and new laws might be enacted in the future. Any such developments (or developments stemming from enactment or modification of other laws) could increase the costs of regulatory compliance for us or force us to change our business practices.
Third parties may bring intellectual property infringement claims against us that would be expensive to defend and, if successful, could subject us to significant liability and block us from using key technology.
From time to time in the ordinary course of business we have been subject to claims of alleged infringement of the trademarks, patents, and other intellectual property rights of third parties. Any such claims, if made, and any resulting litigation, should it occur, could subject us to significant liability for damages. In addition, even if we prevail, litigation could be time-consuming and expensive to defend, and could result in the diversion of our time and attention. Any claims from third parties may also result in limitations on our ability to use the intellectual property subject to these claims unless we are able to enter into license agreements that might not be available on reasonable terms, or at all.
Terrorist activities and resulting military and other actions could harm our business.
Terrorist attacks in New York and Washington, D.C. in September of 2001 disrupted commerce throughout the world. The continued threat of terrorism, recent military action in Iraq, and heightened security measures in response to this threat may cause significant disruption to commerce throughout the world. To the extent that disruptions result in a general decrease in corporate spending on advertising, our business and results of operations could be harmed. We are unable to predict whether the threat of terrorism or the responses thereto will result in any long-term commercial disruptions or if such activities or responses will have a long-term adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. Additionally, if any attacks were to affect our key data centers, our business could be harmed.
29
Risks Related to Accounting Matters
If requirements relating to accounting treatment for employee stock options are changed, we might decide to change our compensation practices, which might increase our cash compensation expense.
We currently account for the issuance of stock options under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. If proposals currently under consideration by standards-setting authorities are adopted, we may be required to treat the fair value of the stock options granted to employees as compensation expense. Such a change would likely have a negative effect on our earnings. In response to a requirement to expense the fair value of stock options, we might decide to decrease the number of employee stock options granted to our employees. Such a reduction could affect our ability to retain existing employees and attract qualified candidates, and increase the cash compensation we would have to pay to them. An increase in employee wages and salaries would decrease our cash available for marketing, product development and other uses.
If accounting interpretations relating to revenue recognition change, our reported revenues could decline or we could be forced to make changes in our business practices.
Over the last several years, the accounting profession has issued several standards and interpretations relating to revenue recognition. For example, the Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus on Issue No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, and the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition, or SAB 104, which explains how the SEC staff believes existing revenue recognition rules should be applied. We believe that our revenue recognition policies are currently in compliance with EITF 00-21 and SAB 104.
The accounting profession continues to discuss revenue recognition standards with the objective of providing guidance on potential interpretations. These discussions and the issuance of interpretations, once finalized, could lead to unanticipated changes in our current revenue accounting practices, which could cause us to recognize lower revenues. These changes may extend sales cycles, increase administrative costs and otherwise harm our business.
Risks Related to the Capital Markets
We may not be able to secure additional financing to meet our future capital needs.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to cover our expenses and capital expenditures, we will need to raise additional funds. We may require additional funding, for example, to fund brand promotion, develop new or enhanced products and services, respond to competitive pressures or make acquisitions. We might be unable to obtain any required additional financing on terms favorable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we might be unable to fund our expansion, successfully promote our brand, develop or enhance products and services, respond to competitive pressures or take advantage of acquisition opportunities, any of which could seriously harm our business. If we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity securities, our stockholders might experience dilution of their ownership interest, and the newly issued securities might have rights superior to those of the common stock. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt, its terms may impose limitations on our operations, including limitations on the payment of dividends. If we do not sustain profitability in the future and are unable to obtain additional financing, then we will eventually be unable to continue our operations.
30
Our stock price may fluctuate significantly regardless of our actual operating performance.
Our common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq National Market. The trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be highly volatile. Our stock price may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors, including:
| actual or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results and announcements of technological innovations; | |
| new products or services offered by us or our competitors; | |
| changes in financial estimates by securities analysts; | |
| changes in research coverage by securities analysts; | |
| conditions or trends in the Internet services industry; | |
| any announcement by us of significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; | |
| additions or departures of key personnel; | |
| sales by current holders of our common stock and general financial conditions and investor sentiment regarding Internet companies generally; and | |
| other events that may be beyond our control. |
In addition, the Nasdaq National Market, where most publicly held Internet companies are traded, has periodically experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations may be unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market and industry factors may harm the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of an individual companys securities, securities class action litigation often has been instituted against that company. For example, on October 25, 2001, a putative class action lawsuit captioned Leonard Turroff, et al. vs. Ask Jeeves, Inc., et al. was filed against us and two of our officers and directors in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging violation of Federal securities laws. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of managements attention and resources. See further discussion of this lawsuit and other litigation in Note 2 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
If we fail to meet the expectations of public market analysts and investors, the market price of our common stock may decrease significantly.
Public market analysts and investors have not been able to develop consistent financial models for the Internet market because of the unpredictable rate of growth of Internet use, the rapidly changing models of doing business on the Internet and the Internets relatively low barriers to entry. As a result, and because of the other risks noted in this discussion, our actual results might not meet the expectations of public market analysts and investors in future periods. If this occurs, the price of our common stock will likely decrease.
Future sales of our stock could affect our stocks market price.
If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock, including shares sold by directors or officers and shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or in connection with acquisitions, the market price of our common stock could fall. These sales also might make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate.
Provisions in Delaware law and our charter, stock option agreements and offer letters to executive officers may prevent or delay a change of control.
We are subject to the Delaware anti-takeover laws regulating corporate takeovers. These anti-takeover laws prevent Delaware corporations from engaging in a merger or sale of more than 10% of its assets with
31
| the board of directors approved the transaction in which the stockholder acquired 15% or more of the corporations assets; | |
| after the transaction in which the stockholder acquired 15% or more of the corporations assets, the stockholder owned at least 85% of the corporations outstanding voting stock, excluding shares owned by directors, officers and employee stock plans in which employee participants do not have the right to determine confidentially whether shares held under the plan will be tendered in a tender or exchange offer; or | |
| on or after this date, the merger or sale is approved by the board of directors and the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the stockholder. |
A Delaware corporation may opt out of the Delaware anti-takeover laws if its certificate of incorporation or bylaws so provide. We have not opted out of the provisions of the anti-takeover laws. As such, these laws could prohibit or delay mergers or other takeover or change of control of Ask Jeeves and may discourage attempts by other companies to acquire us.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws include a number of provisions that may deter or impede hostile takeovers or changes of control or management. These provisions include:
| our board is classified into three classes of directors as nearly equal in size as possible with staggered three year-terms; | |
| the authority of our board to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences and privileges of these shares, without stockholder approval; | |
| all stockholder actions must be effected at a duly called meeting of stockholders and not by written consent; | |
| except under limited circumstances, special meetings of the stockholders may be called only by the chairman of the board, the chief executive officer, the board of directors or by holders of shares entitled to cast not less than 50% of the votes of the meeting; and | |
| except under limited circumstances, no cumulative voting is allowed. |
These provisions may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change of control. In addition, certain material agreements contain change in control provisions that may discourage or delay attempts to acquire us.
Furthermore, in April 2001, we adopted a stockholder rights plan and declared a dividend distribution of one right for each outstanding share of common stock to stockholders of record as of May 7, 2001. Each right entitles the holder to purchase one unit consisting of one one-thousandth of a share of our Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock for $20 per unit. Under certain circumstances, if a person or group acquires 15% or more of our outstanding common stock, holders of the rights (other than the person or group triggering their exercise) will be able to purchase, in exchange for the $20 exercise price, shares of our common stock or of any company into which we are merged having a value of $40. The rights expire on May 7, 2011 unless extended by our board of directors. Because the rights may substantially dilute the stock ownership of a person or group attempting to take us over without the approval of our board of directors, our rights plan could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us or a significant percentage of our outstanding capital stock without first negotiating with our board of directors regarding such acquisition.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that we will indemnify officers and directors against losses that they may incur in investigations and legal proceedings resulting from their services to us, which may include services in connection with takeover defense measures. These provisions may have the effect of preventing changes in our management.
32
Offer letters and severance benefit letter agreements with our executive officers provide for the payment of severance and acceleration of options upon the termination of these executive officers following a change of control of Ask Jeeves. These provisions in our stock option agreements and offer letters could have the effect of discouraging potential takeover attempts.
Risks Related to our Subordinated Convertible Notes
Our stock price has been volatile historically and may continue to fluctuate widely regardless of our actual operating performance. Significant volatility in the price of our common stock will likely cause the price of the notes to fluctuate significantly, which may make it difficult for holders to resell the notes or the shares of our common stock issuable upon conversion of the notes when desired or at attractive prices.
Because the notes are convertible into shares of our common stock, volatility or depressed prices for our common stock could have a similar effect on the trading price of the notes. Holders who receive common stock upon conversion also will be subject to the risk of volatility and depressed prices of our common stock. In addition, the existence of the notes may encourage short selling in our common stock by market participants because the conversion of the notes could depress the price of our common stock, and the short selling could also put downward pressure on the market price of our common stock.
The notes are subordinated and there are no financial covenants in the indenture. Therefore, we may be unable to repay our obligations under the notes.
The notes are unsecured and subordinated in right of payment in full to all of our existing and future senior debt. Because the notes are subordinated to our senior debt, in the event of (1) our liquidation or insolvency, (2) a payment default on our designated senior debt, (3) a covenant default on our designated senior debt (as defined in Description of Notes Subordination of Notes in the resale prospectus), or (4) acceleration of the notes due to an event of default, we will make payments on the notes only after our senior debt has been paid in full. After paying our senior debt in full, we might not have sufficient assets remaining to pay any or all amounts due on the notes.
Our subsidiaries are separate legal entities and have no obligation to make any payments on the notes or make any funds available for payment on the notes, whether by dividends, loans or other payments. The payment of dividends and the making of loans and advances to us by our subsidiaries may be subject to statutory or contractual restrictions and are dependent upon the earnings of our subsidiaries. Our subsidiaries have not guaranteed the payment of the notes. Our right to receive assets of any of our subsidiaries upon their liquidation or reorganization, and a noteholders right to participate in these assets, will be effectively subordinated to the claims of that subsidiarys creditors. Consequently, the notes are effectively subordinated to all liabilities, including trade payables, of any of our subsidiaries and any subsidiaries that we may in the future acquire or establish, except to the extent that we are recognized as a creditor of such subsidiary, in which case our claims would still be subordinate to any security interests in the assets of such subsidiary and any debt of such subsidiary senior to that held by us.
As of March 31, 2004, (i) we had $7.7 million of senior debt outstanding consisting primarily of operating leases, and (ii) our subsidiaries had no outstanding indebtedness and approximately $6.5 million of other liabilities, including trade payables, but excluding intercompany liabilities, to which the notes are effectively subordinated. Neither we nor our subsidiaries are prohibited or limited from incurring debt or acting as guarantors of debt for others in whom we or our subsidiaries may have an interest under the indenture. Our ability to pay our obligations on the notes could be adversely affected by our or our subsidiaries incurrence of additional indebtedness or other liabilities. We and our subsidiaries may from time to time incur additional indebtedness and other liabilities, including senior debt. See Description of Notes Subordination of Notes in the resale prospectus.
33
We significantly increased our leverage as a result of the sale of the notes.
In connection with the sale of the notes, we incurred $115 million of indebtedness, which substantially increased our principal payment obligations. The degree to which we are leveraged could materially and adversely affect our ability to obtain financing for working capital, acquisitions or other purposes and could make us more vulnerable to industry downturns and competitive pressures.
We do not expect a public market for the notes to develop.
There currently is no organized trading market for the notes in as much as they are not listed on any exchange and there can be no assurance as to (1) the liquidity of any market for the notes that may develop; (2) the ability of the holders to sell their notes; or (3) the prices at which holders of the notes would be able to sell their notes. If markets were to exist, the notes could trade at prices higher or lower than their initial purchase prices depending on many factors. If an active market for the notes fails to develop or be sustained, the trading price of the notes could decline significantly. We do not intend to apply for listing of the notes on any securities exchange or for quotation on The Nasdaq National Market.
We might not have the ability to repurchase the notes in cash if a holder exercises its repurchase right upon the occurrence of a change in control.
Holders of the notes have the right to require us to redeem the notes upon the occurrence of a change in control prior to maturity as described under the heading Description of Notes Purchase of Notes at Your Option Upon a Change in Control in the resale prospectus. We might not have sufficient funds to make the required repurchase in cash at such time or the ability to arrange necessary financing on acceptable terms. In addition, our ability to repurchase the notes in cash might be limited by law or the terms of other agreements relating to our indebtedness outstanding at the time. We have the ability under the terms of the notes to pay the repurchase price in shares of our common stock, regardless of whether we have cash available, but doing so might be highly dilutive.
34
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Sensitivity
We are exposed to interest rate, market and credit risk and related changes in the market values of our investment portfolio. Our investment portfolio consists primarily of high credit quality US, state and municipal government, corporate, asset-backed, and agency debt instruments. Investments in both fixed and floating rate securities have some degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted by increases in interest rates. Floating rate securities may produce less income than anticipated if interest rates fall. As a result, changes in interest rates may cause us to incur losses in principal if we are forced to sell securities that have declined in market value or may result in lower than anticipated investment income. Our investment portfolio is categorized as available-for-sale and accordingly is presented at fair value on the balance sheet.
We manage our exposure to interest rate, market and credit risk in the investment portfolio with investment policies and procedures that limit such variables as term, credit rating and the amount of credit exposure to any one issue, issuer and type of instrument. We have not used derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio.
During the three months ended March 31, 2004, the effects of changes in interest rates on the fair market value of our marketable investment securities and our earnings were not material. Further, we believe that the impact on the fair market value of our securities and our earnings from a hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would not be significant.
We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio to manage interest rate risk. We place our investments in instruments that meet high credit quality standards, as specified in our investment policy guidelines, which limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issue, issuer or type of instrument.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
The majority of our revenue, expense and capital purchasing activities are transacted in U.S. dollars. However, since a significant portion of our operations occurs outside of the U.S., we enter into transactions in other currencies, including the British pound and the Euro. We currently do not hedge our exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations. However, in order to limit such exposure some contracts of our international operations are denominated in U.S. dollars and certain cash balances are maintained in U.S. dollars. Our international business is subject to risks typical of an international business, including but not limited to differing economic conditions, changes in political climate, differing tax structures, transfer pricing risks, other regulations and restrictions and foreign exchange rate volatility, particularly the exchange rate between the British pound and the U.S. dollar. Changes in these or other factors could harm our business, operating results and financial condition.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this report, which we refer to as the Evaluation Date. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the Evaluation Date such that the information relating to Ask Jeeves, including our consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in our SEC reports:
| is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and |
35
| is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. |
During the quarter ended March 31, 2004, no change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred that, in our judgment, either materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
36
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings |
On October 25, 2001, a putative class action lawsuit captioned Leonard Turroff, et al. vs. Ask Jeeves, Inc., et al. was filed against us and two of our officers and directors (collectively the Individual Defendants) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Also named as defendants were Morgan Stanley & Co,, Inc., FleetBoston Robertson Stephens, Goldman Sachs & Co., U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray, and Dain Rauscher, Inc., the underwriters of our initial public offering. The complaint alleges violations of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933 against all defendants, and violations of Section 15 of the Securities Act against the Individual Defendants in connection with our initial public offering. An amended complaint was filed on December 6, 2001, which includes the same allegations in connection with our secondary offering in March 2000. The complaints seek unspecified damages on behalf of a purported class of purchasers of our common stock between June 30, 1999 and December 6, 2000. This case is similar to, and has been coordinated with, over three hundred other cases filed in the Southern District Court of New York concerning the IPO market of the late 1990s. A coordinated settlement has been proposed. On June 24, 2003, a special committee of our board of directors approved our participation in this settlement and on July 9, 2003, the Individual Defendants approved the settlement. We expect that the costs and expenses of this settlement will be paid by Ask Jeeves, up to our $1.0 million insurance retention. Accordingly, we have reserved such amount on our balance sheet. Any payments beyond that amount will be covered by our insurance carriers, up to the limits of the relevant policies. We anticipate that the settlement will be submitted to the Court for approval in the near future. If the settlement does not occur, and the litigation against our company continues, we believe we have meritorious defenses and intend to defend the case vigorously.
On January 27, 2004, a lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York captioned American Blind and Wallpaper, Inc. v. Google, Inc., et al., in which Ask Jeeves, Inc., America Online, Inc., Netscape Communications Corporation, Compuserve Interactive Services, Inc., and Earthlink, Inc. were also named as defendants. On February 27, 2004, the Company was served with an Amended Complaint in the matter. The Complaint alleges trademark infringement, false representation, and dilution under the Lanham Act and other claims arising from defendants alleged unlawful use of plaintiffs trademarks. Plaintiffs claims are based on the allegations that defendants sell keywords identical to plaintiffs marks to various third parties and by manipulating search results, consumers are unwittingly diverted to competitors products and services. The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and an unspecified amount of damages. The Company has tendered this suit to Google for indemnification pursuant to the terms of the Advertising Services Agreement, dated July 17, 2002, between Ask Jeeves and Google and Google has agreed to indemnify us to the extent the claims relate to the Google paid listing.
In managements opinion, resolution of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse impact on our results of operation, cash flows or financial position. However, depending on the amount and timing, an unfavorable resolution of these matters could materially and adversely affect our future results of operations, cash flows or financial position in a future period.
Item 2. | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds |
Not applicable.
Item 3. | Defaults Under Senior Securities |
None.
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None
37
Item 5. | Other Information |
Not applicable.
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
a) | Exhibits |
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the Signatures section of this report) are included, or incorporated by reference, in this quarterly report.
b) | Reports on Form 8-K |
During the quarter ended March 31, 2004, we filed the following reports on Form 8-K:
(1) | January 28, 2004. This report announced under Item 12 our fourth quarter and year-end 2003 results and furnished our earnings release as an exhibit. | |
(2) | March 3, 2004. This report announced under Item 5 that we signed a definitive agreement to acquire privately held Interactive Search Holdings, Inc. The Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the Merger Agreement) was filed as an exhibit. In addition, this report announced under Item 9 updated earnings guidance for the first quarter and full-year 2004 and furnished the press release containing such updated guidance. |
38
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
ASK JEEVES, INC. |
May 3, 2004
By: | /s/ STEVEN BERKOWITZ |
|
|
Steven Berkowitz | |
Chief Executive Officer | |
(Principal Executive Officer) |
May 3, 2004
By: | /s/ STEVEN J. SORDELLO |
|
|
Steven J. Sordello | |
Chief Financial Officer | |
(Principal Financial Officer) |
May 3, 2004
By: | /s/ SCOTT T. BAUER |
|
|
Scott T. Bauer | |
Vice President and Corporate Controller | |
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
39
EXHIBIT INDEX
Pursuant to Item 601(a)(2) of Regulation S-K, this Exhibit Index immediately precedes the exhibits.
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
Plans of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation or Succession | ||||
2.1 | Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated June 29, 1999, by and between the Registrant and AJ Merger Corporation (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
2.2 | Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of November 19, 1999, by and among the Registrant, Net Effect Systems, Inc. and Neutral Acquisition Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 18, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
2.3 | Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of January 25, 2000, by and among the Registrant, Direct Hit Technologies, Inc. and Answer Acquisition Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed February 14, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
2.4 | Certificate of Ownership and Merger Merging Net Effects Systems, Inc. and Direct Hit Technologies, Inc. with and into the Registrant, dated as of December 28, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 2.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
2.5 | Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, dated as of September 10, 2001, by and among the Registrant, Answer Acquisition Corp. No. 2, and Teoma Technologies, Inc., and solely with respect to Article X, Hawk Holdings, LLC, as Stockholders Agent, and Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust, N.A., as Escrow Agent (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 17, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
2.6 | Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated March 3, 2004, by and among the Registrant, Interactive Search Holdings, Inc., Aqua Acquisition Corp. and Aqua Acquisition Holdings LLC (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 5, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Charter Documents | ||||
3.1.1 | Certificate of Incorporation of AJ Merger Corporation (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Form S-1, filed April 30, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
3.1.2 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated July 6, 1999 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
3.1.3 | Certificate of Correction of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, dated as of April 6, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
3.1.4 | Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 10, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Bylaws | ||||
3.2 | Bylaws of the Registrant (previously filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrants Form S-1, filed April 30, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
3.2.2 | Certificate of Amendment of Bylaws, adopted on October 30, 2003 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 1, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference) |
40
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders | ||||
4.1 | Specimen Certificate for Registrants Common Stock (previously filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Registrants Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1, filed June 7, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
4.2.1 | Rights Agreement (commonly called a poison pill plan), dated as of April 26, 2001, between the Registrant and Fleet National Bank, N.A. (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 10, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
4.2.2 | Form of Rights Certificate (filed as Exhibit B to Rights Agreement, dated as of April 26, 2001, between the Registrant and Fleet National Bank, N.A., previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 10, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
4.3.1 | Indenture (relating to the Zero Coupon Subordinated Convertible Notes), dated as of June 4, 2003, by and between Ask Jeeves, Inc. and The Bank of New York, as Trustee (previously filed as Exhibit 4.3.1 to the Registrants Form S-3 registration statement, filed September 19, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
4.3.2 | Form of Zero Coupon Convertible Subordinated Note (included within Exhibit 4.3.1). | |||
4.4 | Form of Stock Resale Agreement, dated March 3, 2004, between Ask Jeeves, Inc. and each of the following (stockholders of Interactive Search Holdings, Inc.), separately: Bain Capital Fund VI, L.P.; BCIP Associates II; BCIP Trust Associates II; BCIP Associates II-B; BCIP Trust Associates II-B; BCIP Associates II-C; PEP Investments PTY LTD.; Sankaty High Yield Asset Partners, L.P.; Sankaty High Yield Partners II, L.P.; Brookside Capital Partners Fund L.P.; BCI-I, LLC; BCI-II, LLC; RGIP, LLC; William Daugherty; J.P. Morgan Partners (BHCA), L.P.; Jonas Steinman; Viacom Inc.; Frank William Daugherty, III 2004 GRAT; and Jonas L. Steinman 2004 GRAT (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 5, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Equity Compensation Plan Documents | ||||
10.1.1.1 | 1996 Equity Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Form S-1, filed April 30, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.1.2 | Form of Option Agreement for the 1996 Equity Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Form S-1, filed April 30, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.2.1.1 | 1999 Equity Incentive Plan, adopted April 16, 1999 and approved by Stockholders on May 21, 1999 and May 25, 2000 (composite plan document reflecting amendments adopted through the date hereof) (previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants Form S-8, filed May 15, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.2.2 | Form of Stock Option Grant Notice for the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (previously filed within Exhibit 10.4.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed April 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.2.3 | Form of Option Agreement for the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the Registrants Form S-8, filed November 15, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.2.4 | Form of Addendum to Stock Option Agreement applicable to certain grants under the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan from the Registrant to each of A. George (Skip) Battle, Steven Berkowitz, Steven Sordello, Heather Staples and Claudio Pinkus (previously filed as exhibit 10.1.2.4 to the Registrants Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.3.1 | 1999 Non-Qualified Equity Incentive Plan, as Amended through January 10, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 99.4 to the Registrants Form S-8, filed November 15, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.3.2 | Form of Option Agreement for the 1999 Non-Qualified Equity Incentive Plan (previously filed as Exhibit 99.5 to the Registrants Form S-8, filed November 15, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1.3.3 | 2002 UK Approved Rules for Grants under the 1999 Non-Qualified Equity Plan (the UK Sub Plan), as adopted by the Registrant on January 13, 2003 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1.3.3 to the Registrants Form 10-Q, filed May 2, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). |
41
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
10.1.4 | 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended through May 25, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 99.3 to the Registrants Form S-8, filed November 15, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Other Compensation-Related Agreements | ||||
10.2.1.1 | Offer letter dated as of January 5, 1999, by and between the Registrant and Frank A. Vaculin (previously filed as Exhibit 10.18 to the Registrants Form S-1, filed April 30, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.1.2 | Severance terms as of April 30, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Frank A. Vaculin (previously filed as Exhibit 10.18.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.2.1 | Offer letter dated as of May 27, 1999, by and between the Registrant and George S. Lichter (previously filed as Exhibit 10.29 to the Registrants Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1, filed June 7, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.2.2 | Incentive Agreement, entered into as of January 2, 2001, by and between the Registrant and George Lichter (previously filed as Exhibit 10.46.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.2.3 | Amendment to Incentive Agreement, dated June 18, 2001, by and between the Registrant and George Lichter (previously filed as Exhibit 10.46.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.2.4 | Second Amendment to Incentive Agreement, entered into as of August 30, 2001, by and between the Registrant and George Lichter (previously filed as Exhibit 10.46.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.2.5 | Separation Agreement, dated February 6, 2002, made by and between George Lichter and the Registrant (previously filed as Exhibit 10.46.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.3.1 | Offer letter dated as of December 8, 2000, by and between the Registrant and A. George (Skip) Battle (previously filed as Exhibit 10.40 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed April 2, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.3.2 | Offer letter of New Terms of Employment, dated April 3, 2001, by and between the Registrant and A. George (Skip) Battle (previously filed as Exhibit 10.41 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 14, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.3.3 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, by and between the Registrant and A. George (Skip) Battle (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.3.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.4.1 | Promissory Note, dated March 15, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Steven J. Sordello (previously filed as Exhibit 10.43 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 14, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.4.2 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Steven J. Sordello (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.4.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.4.3 | Addendum to Stock Option Agreement regarding the April 1, 2003 stock option grant under the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan from the Registrant to Steven J. Sordello (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.4.3 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 5, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.4.4 | Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan by and between the Registrant and Steven J. Sordello, dated September 30, 2003 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.4.4 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed November 4, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.5 | Severance letter dated March 28, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Adam Klein previously filed as Exhibit 10.39.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). |
42
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
10.2.6.1 | Offer letter dated April 23, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Steven Berkowitz (previously filed as Exhibit 10.42 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 14, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.6.2 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Steven Berkowitz (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.6.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.6.3 | Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the 1999 Equity Incentive Plan by and between the Registrant and Steven Berkowitz, dated September 30, 2003 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.6.3 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed November 4, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.7.1 | Incentive Agreement, entered into as of January 2, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Claudio Pinkus (previously filed as Exhibit 10.45.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.7.2 | Amendment to Incentive Agreement, dated June 18, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Claudio Pinkus (previously filed as Exhibit 10.45.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.7.3 | Second Amendment to Incentive Agreement, entered into as of August 29, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Claudio Pinkus (previously filed as Exhibit 10.45.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.7.4 | Third Amendment to Incentive Agreement, entered into as of November 17, 2001, by and between the Registrant and Claudio Pinkus (previously filed as Exhibit 10.45.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.7.5 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Claudio Pinkus (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.7.5 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.7.6 | Severance Agreement by and between the Registrant and Claudio Pinkus, dated August 28, 2003 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.7.6 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed November 4, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.8.1 | Form of Indemnity Agreement by and between the Registrant and each of its then-current directors and executive officers (previously filed as Exhibit 10.27 to the Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1, filed May 10, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.8.2 | Form of Indemnification Agreement, entered into in May 2003 (or subsequently) between the Registrant and each of A. George (Skip) Battle, David Carlick, Joshua Goldman, Garrett Gruener, James Kirsner, Geoffrey Y. Yang, Scott Bauer, Steve Berkowitz, Adrian Cox, Jim Diaz, Paul Gardi, Scott Garell, John Scott Lomond, Tuoc Long, Claudio Pinkus, Brett Robertson, Steve Sordello and Heather Staples (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.8.2 to the Registrants Form 10-Q, filed August 5, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.9.1 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Brett M. Robertson (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.9.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.9.2* | Offer Letter dated November 25, 2002 by and between the Registrant and Brett M. Robertson. | |||
10.2.10.1 | Severance Benefit Letter Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Heather J. Staples (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.10.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.11 | Separation Agreement and Mutual Release, dated as of December 23, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Cynthia Pevehouse (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2.11 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.2.12.1* | Offer Letter dated October 27, 2003 by and between the Registrant and Adrian Cox. |
43
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
U.S. Leases | ||||
10.3.1 | Office Lease dated as of April 29, 1999, by and between the Registrant and Emery Station Associates, L.L.C. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.28 to the Registrants Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1, filed June 7, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.3.2 | Master Lease Agreement dated as of June 15, 1999, by and between the Registrant and Comdisco, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit No. 4 to the Registrants Amendment No. 4 to Form S-1, filed June 29, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.3.3 | Lease Amendment and Termination Agreement, made February 4, 2002, by and between the Registrant, as Tenant, and Oakland City Center LLC, as Landlord (previously filed as Exhibit 10.48 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Ask Jeeves U.K. Documents | ||||
10.4.1 | Agreement Relating to the Sale and Purchase of the Entire Issued Share Capital of Carlton & Granada Internet Limited, dated as of February 7, 2002, by and among the Registrant, Carlton Communications PLC, Granada Media Group Limited, Carlton & Granada Internet Limited, Ask Jeeves (Jersey) Limited and Ask Jeeves International, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrants Form S-3, filed March 6, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.4.2 | Further Supplemental Partnership Deed relating to Ask Jeeves UK, dated February 14, 2002, by and among the Registrant, Carlton Communications PLC, Granada Media Group Limited, Carlton & Granada Internet Limited, Ask Jeeves (Jersey) Limited, Ask Jeeves International Inc. and Ask Jeeves UK (previously filed as Exhibit 10.49 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed April 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.4.3 | Tax Deed relating to the acquisition of the entire issued share capital of Carlton & Granada Internet Limited, dated March 6, 2002, by and among the Registrant, Carlton Communications PLC and Granada Media Group Limited (previously filed as Exhibit 10.50 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed April 30, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.4.4 | Underlease, dated March 15, 2000, by and between City & General (West End) Limited and the Ask Jeeves UK Partnership (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Japanese Joint Venture Documents | ||||
10.5.1 | Joint Venture Agreement by and between Trans Cosmos Inc. USA Pacific Holdings Company III, and Ask Jeeves International, Inc., dated as of August 31, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.5.2.1 | Distribution and License Agreement by and between Ask Jeeves International, Inc., Ask Jeeves Japan Co., Ltd., the Registrant, and Trans Cosmos, Inc., dated as of August 31, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5.2.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.5.2.2 | Amendment No. 1 to the Distribution and License Agreement by and between Ask Jeeves International, Inc. and Kabushiki Kaisha Ask Jeeves Japan, dated as of December 1, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5.2.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.5.2.3 | Amendment No. 2 to the Distribution and License Agreement by and between Ask Jeeves International, Inc. and Kabushiki Kaisha Ask Jeeves Japan, dated as of January 1, 2002 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.5.2.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Warrants to Purchase Common Stock of the Registrant | ||||
10.6.1 | Warrant to purchase 15,000 shares of Common Stock granted by the Registrant to Antenna Group Provided, dated as of June 30, 1998 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1, filed May 10, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.6.2 | Warrant to purchase 105,000 shares of Common Stock granted by the Registrant to Boris Katz, dated as of July 26, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.7 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). |
44
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
10.6.3 | Warrant to purchase 70,000 shares of Common Stock granted by the Registrant to Patrick Winston, dated as of July 26, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 4.8 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Registration Rights Agreements | ||||
10.7.1 | Form of Registration Rights Agreement, between the Registrant and Stockholders of Net Effect Systems, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.35 to the Registrants Amendment No. 1 to Form S-1, filed February 23, 2000, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.7.2 | Registration Rights Agreement, dated September 10, 2001, by and between the Registrant and the multiple parties listed therein (previously filed as Exhibit 10.44 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed September 17, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.7.3 | Registration Rights Agreement (relating to the Zero Coupon Subordinated Convertible Notes), dated as of June 4, 2003, by and between Ask Jeeves, Inc. and Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, as initial purchaser (previously filed as Exhibit 10.7.3 to the Registrants Form S-3 registration statement, filed September 19, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
Miscellaneous | ||||
10.8.1 | Advertising Services Agreement, dated July 17, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Google, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.52 to the Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, filed August 14, 2002, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.8.2 | Amendment Number One to the Advertising Services Agreement, dated October 23, 2002, by and between the Registrant and Google, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.8.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.8.3 | Google Services Agreement, dated May 15, 2003, by and between Ask Jeeves UK Partnership and Google Technology, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 15, 2003, filed May 29, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.9.1 | Agreement by and between the Registrant and The Wodehouse No. 3 Trust, dated as of January 1, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.9.2 | First Amendment to Agreement by and between the Registrant and The Wodehouse No. 3 Trust, dated as of May 9, 2003 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.9.2 to the Registrants Form 10-Q filed August 5, 2003 and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.10.1 | DARTTM Service Agreement for Publishers by and between DoubleClick Inc. and the Registrant, effective as of March 31, 1999 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.10.2 | Addendum No. 1 to DART Service Agreement for Publishers by and between DoubleClick Inc. and the Registrant, effective as of October 1, 2000 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.2 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.10.3 | Addendum No. 2 to DART Service Agreement for Publishers by and between DoubleClick Inc. and the Registrant, effective as of March 30, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.3 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.10.4 | DFP Extension Addendum No. 3 to DART Service Agreement for Publishers by and between DoubleClick Inc. and the Registrant, effective as of November 1, 2002 (previously filed as Exhibit 10.10.4 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 12, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.10.5.1* | DoubleClick Master Services Agreement (the U.S. Master Agreement) by and between DoubleClick, Inc. and the Registrant, dated February 27, 2004. | |||
10.10.5.2* | DART Services Attachment for Publishers (the DFP Attachment to the U.S. Master Agreement) by and between DoubleClick, Inc. and the Registrant, dated February 27, 2004. | |||
10.10.6.1* | DoubleClick European Master Services Agreement (the European Master Agreement) by and between DoubleClick, Inc. and Ask Jeeves Europe, Ltd., dated February 27, 2004. |
45
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
10.10.6.2* | DART Services Attachment for Publishers (the DFP Attachment to the European Master Agreement) by and between DoubleClick, Inc. and Ask Jeeves Europe, Ltd., dated February 27, 2004. | |||
10.11 | Asset Purchase Agreement dated May 28, 2003 (relating to the disposition of the Jeeves Solutions assets) by and between Ask Jeeves, Inc., as seller, and Kanisa Inc., as buyer, (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 28, 2003, filed May 29, 2003, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.12.1 | Form of Non-Competition Agreement, dated March 3, 2004, between Ask Jeeves, Inc. and each of the following persons, separately: William Daugherty and Jonas Steinman (previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 5, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.12.2 | Form of Standstill Agreement, dated March 3, 2004, between Ask Jeeves, Inc. and each of the following (stockholders of Interactive Search Holdings, Inc.), separately: Bain Capital Fund VI, L.P.; BCIP Associates II; BCIP Trust Associates II; BCIP Associates II-B; BCIP Trust Associates II-B; BCIP Associates II-C; PEP Investments PTY LTD.; Sankaty High Yield Asset Partners, L.P.; Sankaty High Yield Partners II, L.P.; Brookside Capital Partners Fund L.P.; BCI-I, LLC; BCI-II, LLC; RGIP, LLC; William Daugherty; J.P. Morgan Partners (BHCA), L.P.; Jonas Steinman; Frank William Daugherty, III 2004 GRAT; and Jonas L. Steinman 2004 GRAT (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 5, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.12.3 | Form of Stockholder Agreement, dated March 3, 2004, between Ask Jeeves, Inc. and each of the following (stockholders of Interactive Search Holdings, Inc.), separately: Bain Capital Fund VI, L.P.; BCIP Associates II; BCIP Trust Associates II; BCIP Associates II-B; BCIP Trust Associates II-B; BCIP Associates II-C; PEP Investments PTY LTD.; Sankaty High Yield Asset Partners, L.P.; Sankaty High Yield Partners II, L.P.; Brookside Capital Partners Fund L.P.; BCI-I, LLC; BCI-II, LLC; RGIP, LLC; William Daugherty; J.P. Morgan Partners (BHCA), L.P.; Jonas Steinman; Viacom Inc.; Frank William Daugherty, III 2004 GRAT; and Jonas L. Steinman 2004 GRAT (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K, filed March 5, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
14.1 | Code of Ethics of the Registrant, as currently in effect (previously filed as Exhibit 14.1 to the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 1, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
21.1* | Subsidiaries of the Registrant. | |||
31.1* | Certification of Steven Berkowitz under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
31.2* | Certification of Steven J. Sordello under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
32.1* | Certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
* | Filed herewith. |
| Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan. |
| Portions of this exhibit were omitted and filed separately with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment. |
46