UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission File Number: 000-30700
Crown Media Holdings, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 84-1524410 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | ||
Incorporation or Organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
6430 S. Fiddlers Green Circle,
Suite 225,
Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)
(303) 220-7990
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
6430 S. Fiddlers Green Circle,
Suite 500,
Greenwood Village, Colorado 80111
(Former Name, Former Address, and Former Fiscal Year,
if Changed Since Last Report.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [X] No [ ]
As of August 6, 2003, the number of shares of Class A Common Stock, $.01 par value outstanding was 73,794,606, and the number of shares of Class B Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding was 30,670,422.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||||||||
PART I | Financial Information |
|||||||
Item 1 | Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
3 | ||||||
CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES |
||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheets December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003 (Unaudited) |
3 | |||||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss (Unaudited) |
||||||||
- Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 and 2003
|
4 | |||||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) |
||||||||
- Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 and 2003
|
5 | |||||||
Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
6 | |||||||
Item 2 | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
22 | ||||||
Item 3 | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
36 | ||||||
Item 4 | Controls and Procedures |
37 | ||||||
PART II | Other Information |
|||||||
Item 2 | Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds |
38 | ||||||
Item 4 | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
38 | ||||||
Item 6 | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
39 | ||||||
Signatures | 40 |
2
The discussion set forth in this Form 10-Q contains statements concerning potential future events. Such forward-looking statements are based on assumptions by Crown Media Holdings, Inc.s (Crown Media Holdings or the Company) management, as of the date of this Form 10-Q including assumptions about risks and uncertainties faced by Crown Media Holdings. Readers can identify these forward-looking statements by their use of such verbs as expects, anticipates, believes, or similar verbs or conjugations of such verbs. If any of managements assumptions prove incorrect or should unanticipated circumstances arise, Crown Media Holdings actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements could materially differ from those anticipated by such forward-looking statements. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are those discussed in this Form 10-Q under the heading Risk Factors. Crown Media Holdings will not update any forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-Q to reflect future events or developments.
In this Form 10-Q the terms Crown Media Holdings, we, us and our refer to Crown Media Holdings, and, unless the context requires otherwise, subsidiaries of Crown Media Holdings that operate our businesses, Crown Media International, LLC (Crown Media International), Crown Media United States, LLC (Crown Media United States), Crown Media Distribution, LLC (Crown Media Distribution), Crown Entertainment Limited (Crown Entertainment), Crown Media Trust (Crown Media Trust), and H&H Programming Asia, L.L.C. (H&H Programming Asia) . The term common stock refers to our Class A common stock and Class B common stock, unless the context requires otherwise.
The names Hallmark, Hallmark Entertainment, TOTAL CHOICE and other product or service names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their owners.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
As of December 31, | As of June 30, | |||||||||
2002 | 2003 | |||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 335 | $ | 8,286 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $7,516 and $8,016,
respectively |
41,629 | 45,895 | ||||||||
Program license fees affiliates, net of accumulated amortization |
12,632 | 24,720 | ||||||||
Program license fees non-affiliates, net of accumulated amortization |
46,557 | 52,838 | ||||||||
Subtitling and dubbing, net of accumulated amortization |
3,265 | 2,830 | ||||||||
Prepaids and other assets |
12,837 | 12,067 | ||||||||
Total current assets |
117,255 | 146,636 | ||||||||
Restricted cash |
340 | 340 | ||||||||
Program license fees affiliates, net of current portion |
37,318 | 32,416 | ||||||||
Program license fees non-affiliates, net of current portion |
51,470 | 55,987 | ||||||||
Subtitling and dubbing, net of current portion |
1,051 | 938 | ||||||||
Film assets, net of accumulated amortization |
786,826 | 775,260 | ||||||||
Subscriber acquisition fees, net of accumulated amortization |
140,265 | 125,981 | ||||||||
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation |
35,612 | 31,733 | ||||||||
Goodwill |
314,033 | 314,033 | ||||||||
Debt issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization |
6,309 | 5,555 | ||||||||
Prepaids and other assets, net of current portion |
1,783 | 1,556 | ||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,492,262 | $ | 1,490,435 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||
LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 47,425 | $ | 38,641 | ||||||
Subscriber acquisition fees payable |
45,930 | 24,030 | ||||||||
License fees payable to affiliates |
8,104 | 28,053 | ||||||||
License fees payable to non-affiliates |
50,652 | 49,939 | ||||||||
Payables to affiliates |
6,680 | 7,702 | ||||||||
Interest payable to HC Crown |
10 | 1,069 | ||||||||
Credit facility and other interest payable |
871 | 592 | ||||||||
Capital lease obligation |
1,433 | 1,495 | ||||||||
Deferred film asset license fees |
599 | 402 | ||||||||
Total current liabilities |
161,704 | 151,923 | ||||||||
Accrued liabilities, net of current portion |
31,385 | 24,311 | ||||||||
Subscriber acquisition fees payable, net of current portion |
2,624 | 1,500 | ||||||||
License fees payable to affiliates, net of current portion |
60,229 | 60,229 | ||||||||
License fees payable to non-affiliates, net of current portion |
39,206 | 41,465 | ||||||||
Note payable to HC Crown |
5,000 | 75,000 | ||||||||
Payable to Hallmark Entertainment Holdings, Inc. |
52,052 | 52,052 | ||||||||
Payable to Hallmark Entertainment, Inc. |
47,948 | 47,948 | ||||||||
Credit facility |
320,000 | 320,000 | ||||||||
Capital lease obligation, net of current portion |
9,290 | 8,526 | ||||||||
Convertible debt |
47,916 | 50,816 | ||||||||
Derivative liability |
762 | 1,962 | ||||||||
Total liabilities |
778,116 | 835,732 | ||||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
||||||||||
GUARANTEED PREFERRED BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN CROWN MEDIA
TRUSTS DEBENTURES |
221,551 | 236,162 | ||||||||
REDEEMABLE PREFERRED MINORITY INTEREST |
25,000 | 25,000 | ||||||||
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY: |
||||||||||
Class A common stock, $.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 73,794,606
shares issued and outstanding; as of December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003 |
738 | 738 | ||||||||
Class B common stock, $.01 par value; 120,000,000 shares authorized; 30,670,422 shares
issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003 |
307 | 307 | ||||||||
Paid-in capital |
1,259,242 | 1,280,865 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
647 | 1,057 | ||||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(793,339 | ) | (889,426 | ) | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
467,595 | 393,541 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,492,262 | $ | 1,490,435 | ||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated balance sheets.
3
CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
(Unaudited) | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Subscriber fees |
$ | 16,961 | $ | 17,864 | $ | 34,868 | $ | 33,890 | |||||||||||
Advertising |
17,313 | 23,321 | 30,713 | 45,330 | |||||||||||||||
Advertising by Hallmark Cards |
1,540 | 350 | 2,710 | 700 | |||||||||||||||
Film asset license fees |
3,472 | 3,865 | 10,451 | 7,404 | |||||||||||||||
Other revenue |
21 | 23 | 34 | 57 | |||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
39,307 | 45,423 | 78,776 | 87,381 | |||||||||||||||
Cost of Services: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Programming costs: |
|||||||||||||||||||
Affiliates |
9,380 | 9,987 | 19,762 | 18,724 | |||||||||||||||
Non-affiliates |
12,855 | 14,087 | 26,224 | 28,793 | |||||||||||||||
Amortization of film assets |
5,467 | 6,809 | 12,715 | 13,586 | |||||||||||||||
Subscriber acquisition fee expense |
5,265 | 6,610 | 9,512 | 12,606 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization of technical facilities |
1,186 | 1,186 | 2,372 | 2,371 | |||||||||||||||
Operating costs |
16,305 | 11,591 | 29,530 | 22,083 | |||||||||||||||
Total cost of services |
50,458 | 50,270 | 100,115 | 98,163 | |||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expense |
12,414 | 12,285 | 28,981 | 26,450 | |||||||||||||||
Marketing expense |
10,569 | 8,732 | 20,363 | 14,171 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
2,421 | 2,648 | 4,641 | 5,071 | |||||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(36,555 | ) | (28,512 | ) | (75,324 | ) | (56,474 | ) | |||||||||||
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest accretion |
(1,176 | ) | (12,171 | ) | (11,778 | ) | (23,218 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest expense and other, net |
(5,673 | ) | (7,514 | ) | (11,763 | ) | (14,856 | ) | |||||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(43,404 | ) | (48,197 | ) | (98,865 | ) | (94,548 | ) | |||||||||||
Income tax provision |
(643 | ) | (1,200 | ) | (1,192 | ) | (1,539 | ) | |||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (44,047 | ) | $ | (49,397 | ) | $ | (100,057 | ) | $ | (96,087 | ) | |||||||
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|||||||||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on fair value of derivative asset |
920 | | 863 | | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
517 | 635 | 314 | 410 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive loss |
$ | (42,610 | ) | $ | (48,762 | ) | $ | (98,880 | ) | $ | (95,677 | ) | |||||||
Weighted average number of Class A and Class B shares
outstanding, basic and diluted |
104,328 | 104,465 | 104,227 | 104,465 | |||||||||||||||
Net loss per share, basic and diluted |
$ | (0.42 | ) | $ | (0.47 | ) | $ | (0.96 | ) | $ | (0.92 | ) | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
4
CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | |||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (100,057 | ) | $ | (96,087 | ) | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in
operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
78,875 | 84,795 | ||||||||||
Accretion on guaranteed preferred beneficial interest |
17,186 | 22,018 | ||||||||||
(Gain) loss on change in fair value of derivative liability |
(5,408 | ) | 1,200 | |||||||||
Accretion on convertible debt |
4,023 | 5,191 | ||||||||||
Provision for allowance for doubtful accounts |
3,310 | 1,566 | ||||||||||
Gain on sale of property and equipment |
(7 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||
Stock-based and restricted stock compensation |
12 | 323 | ||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Increase in accounts receivable |
(14,893 | ) | (5,732 | ) | ||||||||
Additions to program license fees |
(59,328 | ) | (65,813 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in subtitling and dubbing |
(2,923 | ) | (1,767 | ) | ||||||||
Additions to subscriber acquisition fees |
(5,848 | ) | (1,224 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in prepaids and other assets |
(1,479 | ) | (474 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(11,077 | ) | (11,710 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease in interest payable |
(1,832 | ) | (768 | ) | ||||||||
Decrease in subscriber acquisition fees payable |
(14,617 | ) | (23,024 | ) | ||||||||
Increase in license fees payable to affiliates |
20,442 | 17,264 | ||||||||||
(Decrease) increase in payables to affiliates |
(1,144 | ) | 1,007 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in deferred film asset license fees |
332 | (197 | ) | |||||||||
Net cash used in operating activities |
(94,433 | ) | (73,447 | ) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(803 | ) | (1,781 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from disposition of property and equipment |
43 | 38 | ||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(760 | ) | (1,743 | ) | ||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock upon exercise
of stock options |
1,629 | | ||||||||||
Proceeds from tax sharing agreement with Hallmark Cards |
| 21,300 | ||||||||||
Borrowings under the HC Crown note payable |
| 70,000 | ||||||||||
Borrowings under the credit facility |
92,000 | | ||||||||||
Payments on the credit facility |
(110,587 | ) | | |||||||||
Decrease in cash in escrow |
111,625 | | ||||||||||
Distribution to holders of guaranteed preferred beneficial interest |
(7,324 | ) | (7,406 | ) | ||||||||
Principal payments under capital lease obligation |
(645 | ) | (702 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
86,698 | 83,192 | ||||||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(81 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(8,576 | ) | 7,951 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
13,859 | 335 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 5,283 | $ | 8,286 | ||||||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash and non-cash activities: |
||||||||||||
Interest paid |
$ | 5,909 | $ | 7,706 | ||||||||
Interest paid on preferred securities |
$ | 8,844 | $ | 8,944 | ||||||||
Income taxes paid |
$ | 1,192 | $ | 1,539 | ||||||||
Change in fair value of derivative asset |
$ | 863 | $ | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated statements of cash flows.
5
CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2002 and 2003
1. Business and Organization
Organization
Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (Crown Media Holdings or the Company), which was incorporated in the state of Delaware in December 1999, through its subsidiaries, owns and operates pay television channels dedicated to high quality, entertainment programming for adults and families in the United States and in various countries throughout the world. The international operations of the Hallmark Channel are operated by Crown Media International LLC (Crown Media International) and, in the United Kingdom, by Crown Entertainment Limited (Crown Entertainment). Crown Media International commenced its operations outside the United States in 1995. Domestically, the Hallmark Channel is operated and distributed by Crown Media United States LLC (Crown Media United States). Crown Media International acquired an interest in Crown Media United States in 1998 and as a result of several transactions Crown Media Holdings owned 100% of the common interests of Crown Media United States by March 2001. Significant investors in Crown Media Holdings include: Hallmark Entertainment Investments Co. (Hallmark Entertainment Investments); Hallmark Entertainment Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of Hallmark Cards, Incorporated (Hallmark Cards); Liberty Media Corporation (Liberty Media) and J.P. Morgan Partners (BHCA), LP (J.P. Morgan), each through their investments in Hallmark Entertainment Investments; VISN Management Corporation, a for-profit subsidiary of the National Interfaith Cable Coalition; and Hughes Electronics Corporation.
Liquidity
In connection with the Companys growth strategy, the Company expects to continue making investments in programming and distribution during the remainder of 2003. Programming expenditures for the remainder of 2003 are expected to be in the range of $40.0 million to $50.0 million, and cash payments for subscriber acquisition fees for the remainder of 2003 are expected to be $25.0 million to $35.0 million. Through June 30, 2003 the Company has expended $42.6 million for programming and $24.2 million for subscriber acquisition fees. If necessary, the Company believes it has discretion to reduce some of this anticipated spending. The Companys principal uses of funds during the remainder of 2003 are expected to be the payment of operating expenses, payments for licensing of programming from third parties and subscriber acquisition fees, and interest payments under its bank credit facility.
On August 5, 2003, Crown Media Holdings repurchased all of the preferred securities of Crown Media Trust and related contingent appreciation certificates issued by the Company. The securities were repurchased for approximately $329.1 million, including approximately $2.4 million of cash distributions on the preferred securities through August 5, 2003. Funds for this repurchase were obtained from the proceeds of a $400.0 million 10.25% senior unsecured discount note issued to HC Crown Corp., a subsidiary of Hallmark Cards. After the payment of certain expenses for the issuance including a fee of $3.0 million to HC Crown, the Company used the balance of the proceeds of the note, approximately $67.4 million, to pay principal, interest, and prepayment penalties on its bank revolving credit loans. The Company will avoid approximately $72.0 million in cash interest payments over the next 4 years due to this repurchase and refinancing.
Through June 30, 2003, Crown Media Holdings had borrowed $75.0 million under the line of credit with HC Crown, which is the full amount available under that line of credit, to pay scheduled subscriber acquisition fee payments, marketing costs and programming fees accrued at the end of the previous year and to support the cash needs of its current operations. Because of the pay down on the bank credit facility on August 5, 2003, the Company has available funds under the bank credit facility of approximately $67.3 million. Prior to the paydown, the Company had borrowed the full amount available under the bank credit facility of $320.0 million. The Companys principal sources of funds are currently cash inflows from operations, cash on hand, periodic cash inflows expected under the tax sharing agreement with Hallmark Cards and amounts available for borrowing under its bank credit facility. In addition, as of August 5, 2003, $32.0 million had been received under the tax sharing agreement and the Company expects that the remaining payments under the tax sharing agreement in 2003 will be approximately $15.0 million. The Company also believes that since the tax sharing agreement is with the Companys largest shareholder, there is a potential that future tax sharing payments could become available to the Company at an earlier date.
6
The Company projects that advertising revenue and licensing fees will increase in 2003, and that certain operating expenses will continue to decrease as a result of the reorganization begun in the fourth quarter of 2002. Considering these projected revenues and reduced expenditures, the Company believes that cash flow from its operations, cash on hand, remaining availability under its credit facility and payments anticipated under the tax sharing agreement will be sufficient to meet its liquidity needs through at least June 2004. However, any decline in the popularity of the Hallmark Channel, any significant future modifications to the Companys distribution agreements, an economic decline in the advertising market, an unexpected increase in competition or other adverse operating conditions will impact the Companys ability to achieve its projected operating results. If the projected operating results are not achieved, the Company may need to obtain additional funding. In any event, in order to provide more liquidity, Crown Media Holdings may consider pursuing alternatives to raise additional cash, which could include the issuance of additional equity or debt securities. There can be no assurance, however, that additional funding will be available, if at all, on terms acceptable to the Company. Any new debt financing would require the agreement of existing lenders, including HC Crown.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Crown Media Holdings and those of its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Crown Media Holdings considers all highly liquid financial instruments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The fair value of Crown Media Holdings cash equivalents approximates cost at each balance sheet date.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash includes amounts deposited to secure letters of credit in accordance with certain lease agreements.
Subscriber Acquisition Fees
Crown Media United States has distribution agreements with eight of the top nine largest (based on number of subscribers) United States pay television distributors. These distributors carry the Hallmark Channel on some of their cable, satellite, terrestrial television, or satellite master antenna television systems. Under certain of these agreements, Crown Media United States is obligated to pay subscriber acquisition fees if defined subscriber levels are met, in order to obtain carriage of the Hallmark Channel by those distributors.
Subscriber acquisition fees are amortized over the life of the distribution agreements as a reduction of subscriber fees revenue. If the amortization expense exceeds the revenue recognized on a per distributor basis, the excess amortization is included as a component of cost of services. Crown Media Holdings assesses the recoverability of these costs periodically and whenever events or changes in distributor relationships occur or other indicators would suggest impairment.
Subscriber acquisition fees are comprised of the following:
As of December 31, | As of June 30, | ||||||||
2002 | 2003 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Subscriber acquisition fees, at cost |
$ | 186,085 | $ | 187,309 | |||||
Accumulated amortization |
(45,820 | ) | (61,328 | ) | |||||
Subscriber acquisition fees, net |
$ | 140,265 | $ | 125,981 | |||||
As of December 31, 2002 and June 30, 2003, the consolidated balance sheets also reflected subscriber acquisition fees payable of $48.6 million and $25.5 million, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, Crown Media United States made cash payments of $6.3 million and $12.8 million, respectively, reducing subscriber acquisition fees payable. For the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, Crown Media United States made cash payments of $20.4 million and $24.2 million, respectively, reducing subscriber acquisition fees payable.
7
On November 7, 2002, the Company entered into an amendment of a distribution agreement with a large distributor in the United States. The amendment extended the distribution agreement for two years to December 31, 2007, and provided for the payment of a substantial cash amount in settlement of the most favored nation clauses in regard to the terms of an agreement with DirecTV in 2001 and for additional full-time subscribers to the Hallmark Channel. The Company paid a portion of the amount upon execution and will make monthly cash payments through December 2003 for the balance. The Company may also be required to pay substantial marketing support payments, if subscribers exceed the final commitment number, through December 31, 2004. In addition, if the distributor achieves the final commitment level of subscribers, subscriber fees will not apply to subscribers above a specified number. The amendment also contains a most favored nation provision relating to other distribution agreements.
Program License Fees
Program license fees are payable in connection with the acquisition of the rights to air programs acquired from others. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 63, Financial Reporting by Broadcasters, program rights are generally deferred and then amortized on a straight-line basis over their license periods (the airing windows) or anticipated usage. At the inception of these contracts and periodically thereafter, Crown Media Holdings evaluates the recoverability of these costs compared to the estimated future revenues directly associated with the programming and related expenses. Where an evaluation indicates that a programming contract will ultimately result in a loss, additional amortization is provided to currently recognize that loss.
Subtitling and Dubbing
Subtitling and dubbing represent costs incurred to prepare programming for airing in international markets. These costs are capitalized as incurred and are amortized over the shorter of the programs airing window for programming licensed from unaffiliated third-parties or the programs estimated life (in the case of programming licensed from Hallmark Entertainment Distribution and the Companys film assets). Beginning in 2003, subtitling and dubbing costs related to programming licensed from Hallmark Entertainment Distribution are being amortized over a maximum period of 3 years. Amortization expense for subtitling and dubbing costs was $1.3 million and $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Amortization expense for subtitling and dubbing costs was $2.4 million and $2.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively.
As of December 31, | As of June 30, | ||||||||
2002 | 2003 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Subtitling and dubbing assets, at cost |
$ | 8,343 | $ | 7,946 | |||||
Accumulated amortization |
(4,027 | ) | (4,178 | ) | |||||
Subtitling and dubbing assets, net |
$ | 4,316 | $ | 3,768 | |||||
Capitalized Leases
Noncancellable leases, which meet the criteria of capital leases, are capitalized as assets and amortized over the lease term.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation of property and equipment is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, ranging from three to eight years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the life of the lease. When property is sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in income. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs are charged to expense when incurred.
Accounting for Trust Preferred Securities
Crown Media Holdings formed a special-purpose entity, Crown Media Trust, in December 2001. Crown Media Trust issued preferred securities in Crown Media Trusts name to investors in a private placement and loaned the proceeds to Crown Media Holdings. This loan was designed so that interest and principal payments matched the dividend and any redemption requirements on the preferred securities issued by Crown Media Trust. Interest received by Crown Media Trust from Crown Media Holdings funded distributions to the holders of the preferred securities.
8
Crown Media Holdings owned 100% of the common equity in Crown Media Trust. The preferred securities included terms that allowed the holder to earn a return above the stated dividend rate on the securities under certain conditions. Based on fair value calculations using discounted cash flows and Black-Scholes models, a portion of the proceeds from the preferred securities was allocated and classified in Crown Media Holdings balance sheet as guaranteed preferred beneficial interest in Crown Media Trusts debentures and a portion was classified as convertible debt. Issuance costs related to the guaranteed preferred beneficial interest portion were netted against the guaranteed preferred beneficial interest and accreted as additional expense in earnings. Issuance costs related to the convertible debt portion were recorded as a deferred debt issuance costs asset and were amortized as additional interest expense, using the effective interest method. See Note 6, Credit Facility and Private Placement, for additional discussion of the terms for the preferred securities and Crown Media Holdings related subordinated debentures and see Note 9, Subsequent Events, for information on the August 5, 2003, repurchase of all of the preferred securities by Crown Media Holdings.
Revenue Recognition
Subscriber fees from pay television distributors are recognized as revenue when an agreement is executed, programming is provided, the price is determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Subscriber fees from pay television distributors are recorded net of amortization of subscriber acquisition costs in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 01-9, Accounting for Consideration Given by a Vendor to a Customer (Including a Reseller of the Vendors Products). Subscriber acquisition fee expense is recorded to the extent that the amortization of subscriber acquisition costs exceed the related revenue earned from the pay television distributor.
Certain revenue from pay television distributors and film license agreements is recognized in accordance with EITF No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. Under EITF No. 00-21, revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into separate units of accounting if the deliverables in the arrangement meet the following criteria: the delivered item has value to the customer on a standalone basis; there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of the undelivered item; and delivery or performance of the undelivered item is considered probable and substantially in the control of the vendor.
Advertising revenues are recognized as earned in the period in which the advertising is telecast. If uncertainty as to the collectibility of this revenue exists, the revenue is recognized on a cash basis. Advertising revenues are recorded net of agency commissions and estimated advertising deficiency reserves.
Advertising revenue and expenses in barter transactions are recorded at the fair value of the advertising to be provided. The fair value is determined based upon amounts paid in cash for similar advertisements from buyers unrelated to the other party in the barter transaction. When the barter advertising revenue does not meet the requirements of EITF No. 99-17, Accounting for Advertising Barter Transactions, no revenue is recognized. For the three months ended June 30, 2002, revenue from advertising barter transactions of $207,000 and the corresponding barter expenses were included in marketing expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. No barter revenue or related expenses were recorded for the three months ended June 30, 2003. For the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, revenue from advertising barter transactions of $320,000 and $94,000, respectively, and the corresponding barter expenses were included in marketing expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Revenue from film asset licensing agreements is recognized when an agreement is executed, the film is available for exhibition by the licensee, the license fee is fixed or reasonably determinable, collectibility is reasonably assured and the cost of each film is known or reasonably determinable. Payments received from licensees prior to the availability of a film are recorded as deferred revenue.
Revenues from foreign sources for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, represented 53% and 47% respectively, of total revenue. Revenues from foreign sources for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, represented 49% and 46% respectively, of total revenue. Such revenues, generally denominated in United States dollars, were primarily from sales to customers in Australia, Malaysia, Mexico, Norway, Poland, Singapore, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom, during all periods presented.
The Company is in discussions with a primary pay television distributor in Spain who has attempted to terminate an existing distribution agreement with the Hallmark Channel. The outcome can not be predicted.
Cost of Services
Cost of services includes signal distribution expenses, depreciation of the Network Operations Center and amortization of the capital lease for uplink and transponder space, amortization of program license fees, subtitling and dubbing amortization and costs, subscriber acquisition amortization and costs, and amortization of film assets.
9
Film Assets
The Company amortizes its film assets using the individual-film-forecast-computation method over a maximum period of 10 years, which amortizes such assets in the same ratio that current period actual revenue bears to estimated unrecognized ultimate revenues as of the beginning of the current fiscal year for sales to third parties and internal usage. The Companys projections regarding sales to third parties and anticipated internal use are based on the history of each film and similar films, sales and marketing plans, and other factors, all of which require significant judgment by management. The 10-year period used for sales to third parties and internal use commences on the date of acquisition and is the same time period used in the initial, external valuation of the Companys film assets at the time of acquisition. The Company also reviews the film assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the carrying value of the individual film assets exceeds the fair value, the film assets are written-down to their fair values. At least annually, the Company is required by the covenants in its credit facility to have a outside valuation expert perform a valuation of the film assets. These valuations supported the Companys determination that the estimated fair value of the film assets as of December 31, 2002, exceeded the carrying value. Amortization expense for the film library was $5.5 million and $6.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Amortization expense for the film library was $12.7 million and $13.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively.
As of December 31, | As of June 30, | ||||||||
2002 | 2003 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Film assets |
$ | 816,172 | $ | 818,096 | |||||
Accumulated amortization |
(29,346 | ) | (42,836 | ) | |||||
Film assets, net of accumulated amortization |
$ | 786,826 | $ | 775,260 | |||||
Goodwill
In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (SFAS No. 141) and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (SFAS No. 142), which were adopted by Crown Media Holdings on January 1, 2002. These standards required companies to cease amortizing goodwill and certain intangible assets with indefinite useful lives acquired or created through business combinations accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Instead, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite useful lives are subject to an annual review for impairment. Crown Media Holdings ceased amortizing goodwill effective January 1, 2002. Valuation experts evaluated the carrying value of the Companys goodwill for impairment upon implementation of SFAS No. 142 and at November 30, 2002, which the Company has selected as its annual goodwill impairment review date. These evaluations support the Companys determination that the estimated fair value of goodwill currently is not less than its carrying value.
Taxes on Income
Income taxes are accounted for using an asset and liability method that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to be applied to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Company reduces deferred tax assets by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Translation of Foreign Currency
The balance sheets and statements of operations of certain Crown Media Holdings foreign subsidiaries are measured using local currency as the functional currency. Revenues, expenses and cash flows of such subsidiaries are translated into United States dollars at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Assets and liabilities are translated at the rates of exchange at the balance sheet date. Translation gains and losses are deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in determining net loss for the period.
10
Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed based on the weighted average number of common shares and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding. The calculation of diluted net loss per share excludes potential common shares if the effect is antidilutive. Potential common shares consist of incremental common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and restricted stock units. Approximately 1.7 million stock options for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, approximately 8.1 million stock options for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, and approximately 2.1 million restricted stock units for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, have been excluded from the calculations of earnings per share because their effect would have been antidilutive. Additionally, 10.1 million contingent appreciation certificates issued in conjunction with the private placement have also been excluded from the calculations of earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, as their effect would have been antidilutive.
Stock-Based Compensation, Employee Incentives and Retention
The Company accounts for its stock-based employee compensation plan using the intrinsic value method under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options issued to employees is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the Companys stock at the date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure an amendment of SFAS No. 123. SFAS No. 148 requires certain additional disclosures related to stock-based compensation plans. SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value.
The Companys Board of Directors approved in April 2003 actions to provide additional incentives to and encourage retention of its employees. Crown Media Holdings then outstanding stock options held by employees had exercise prices significantly above the current market value of its Class A common stock. The Company made an exchange offer in May 2003 to senior management and vice presidents, totaling approximately 55 persons, to exchange their options for restricted stock units (RSUs). The exchange ratio was one RSU for every 2.5 options for shares of the Companys Class A common stock. Each RSU, upon vesting, represents the right to receive one share of Class A common stock or the value of the share in cash at the time of vesting. The Companys Board may determine at its discretion whether the payment is made in common stock or cash. The RSUs vest annually over three years. In the exchange offer, a total of 5,126,732 options were exchanged for 2,050,693 RSUs in May 2003. As a result of the exchange offer, Crown Media Holdings is recording non-cash compensation expense based on the fair value of its common stock on the date of grant of the RSUs over the vesting period of the RSUs. As of June 30, 2003, the Company had recorded $317,288 of compensation expense. Options for 279,254 shares of common stock that were not exchanged are subject to variable plan accounting in which compensation is remeasured at each reporting date until the options are exercised, expire unexercised or are forfeited. No compensation expense was recorded related to the unexchanged options for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, as the price of the Companys Class A common stock on June 30, 2003, was less than the strike price of the underlying unexchanged options. It is currently believed that the Board of Directors will elect to settle the RSU awards in common stock. If the Board of Directors ultimately decides to settle the RSU awards in cash, variable plan accounting will be required.
In addition, Crown Media Holdings Board of Directors vested the stock options of all employees below the vice-president level who held options at the end of May 2003 and granted them a right to receive a future cash payment of $1.00 for each outstanding option held by the employee. The immediate vesting of the employees stock options created a new measurement date which requires the Company record stock compensation expense, if any, for the excess of the Companys stock price on the measurement date over the underlying stock options strike price. Since the price of the Companys Class A common stock on the measurement date was less than the strike price of all of the stock options owned by the employees, no compensation expense was recorded. The June 2004 cash payment is contingent upon employment through that period and is based upon options for a total of 344,386 shares of our Class A common stock. As a result, we are recording related compensation expense from June 2003 through May 2004 as compensation is earned. As of June 30, 2003, we had recorded $29,000 of compensation expense related to this grant.
11
Had compensation costs for these plans been determined consistent with SFAS 123, Crown Media Holdings net loss and loss per share would have been increased to the following pro forma amounts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003:
Pro Forma Effects
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||
Net loss before stock options expense |
$ | (44,047 | ) | $ | (49,397 | ) | $ | (100,057 | ) | $ | (96,087 | ) | |||||
Stock options expense |
(3,089 | ) | (1,654 | ) | (6,178 | ) | (3,308 | ) | |||||||||
Stock options expense included in net loss |
6 | 3 | 12 | 6 | |||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (47,130 | ) | $ | (51,048 | ) | $ | (106,223 | ) | $ | (99,389 | ) | |||||
Weighted average shares |
104,328 | 104,465 | 104,227 | 104,465 | |||||||||||||
Net loss per share, basic and diluted |
$ | (0.45 | ) | $ | (0.49 | ) | $ | (1.02 | ) | $ | (0.95 | ) | |||||
For purposes of this pro forma presentation, the fair value of each option grant was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes model with the following weighted-average assumptions for grants during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. No options were granted during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2002 | June 30, 2002 | |||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
6.00 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||
Volatility factor |
35.21 | % | 35.21 | % | ||||
Dividend yield |
0 | % | 0 | % | ||||
Expected terms of options |
4 years | 6 years |
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company has adopted SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133), as amended. The standard requires the recognition of all derivative instruments on the balance sheet as either assets or liabilities measured at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized immediately in earnings unless the derivatives qualify as hedges of future cash flows. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting the cash flows of the hedged item, the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised, or the derivative is no longer designated as a hedging instrument. Changes in the fair value of the contingent appreciation certificates in the private placement transaction are recognized immediately in earnings. See Note 6 for a discussion of the derivative liability related to the private placement transaction.
For derivatives qualifying as hedges of future cash flows, the effective portion of changes in fair value is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) and recognized in earnings when the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings. Any ineffective portion (representing the extent that the change in fair value of the hedges does not completely offset the change in the anticipated net payments being hedged) is recognized in earnings as it occurs.
The Company formally designates and documents each financial instrument as a hedge of a specific underlying exposure as well as the risk management objectives and strategies for entering into the hedge transaction upon inception. The Company also formally assesses upon inception, and quarterly thereafter, whether the financial instruments used in hedging transactions are effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged items.
The Company was a party to a forward foreign exchange contract in 2002, which was entered into to reduce the exposure to the adverse effects of fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates. This contract, which was designated as a cash flow hedge, was entered into to hedge a payable denominated in a foreign currency, which had a maturity of less than one year. The foreign exchange contract was settled at maturity and the net loss was reclassified to earnings during 2002.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires Crown Media Holdings to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject Crown Media Holdings to a concentration of credit risk, consist primarily of cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Generally, Crown Media Holdings does not require collateral to secure receivables. Crown Media Holdings has no significant off-balance sheet financial instruments with risk of accounting losses.
12
Fair Value
The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including amounts payable and receivable, are reasonable estimates of their fair values because of their short-term nature.
Interim Financial Statements
In the opinion of management, the accompanying balance sheets and related interim statements of operations and cash flows, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, as well as the accounting changes to adopt SFAS No. 133, SFAS No. 141, and SFAS No. 142, necessary for their fair presentation in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The information included in this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis and financial statements and notes thereto included in the Crown Media Holdings, Inc. 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior periods data to the current presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity. This statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity and is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. For financial instruments created before the issuance date, transition shall be achieved by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in an accounting principle by initially measuring the financial instruments at fair value. For mandatorily redeemable financial instruments, dividends and other amounts paid or accrued prior to reclassification of the instrument as a liability shall not be reclassified as interest cost upon transition. Restatement of financial statements for earlier years presented is not permitted.
In accordance with SFAS No. 150, Crown Media Holdings, Inc. reclassified its guaranteed preferred interest in Crown Media Trusts debentures and its preferred minority interest as liabilities as of July 1, 2003. On August 5, 2003, Crown Media Holdings repurchased all of the preferred securities of Crown Media Trust and related contingent appreciation certificates issued by the Company for approximately $329.1 million, including approximately $2.4 million of cash distributions on the preferred securities through August 5, 2003. As of June 30, 2003, the balances of the private placement components were $236.2 million of guaranteed preferred beneficial interests, $50.8 million of convertible debt, $2.0 million of net derivative liability and $1.8 million of debt issuance costs asset, respectively.
3. Reorganization
On October 7, 2002, the Company announced its intention to reorganize its operations in order to concentrate its efforts on the Hallmark Channel in the U.S. and in its more successful international markets. The Company completed decentralizing many oversight and non-technical support functions formerly located in the Companys U.S. based offices and has transferred those responsibilities to regional staff. In Latin America the Company entered into an agreement with a local distribution partner, Pramer S.C.A., who is now responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Hallmark Channel in this region. By April 2003, the Companys workforce was reduced by approximately 30% or 130 positions.
The Company recorded a reorganization charge of $28.8 million during the fourth quarter of 2002. This charge was comprised of a charge of $5.5 million for severance costs and charges of $23.3 million related to exit costs for satellite, transponder and facility leases.
13
The following table displays the activity and balances of the reorganization accrual account from October 7, 2002, to June 30, 2003, which has been included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Satellite and | ||||||||||||||||
Severance | Facilities | Transponder | Total | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance at October 7, 2002 |
$ | 5,492 | $ | 1,651 | $ | 21,658 | $ | 28,801 | ||||||||
Deductions due to payments |
(2,097 | ) | | (545 | ) | (2,642 | ) | |||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002 |
3,395 | 1,651 | 21,113 | 26,159 | ||||||||||||
Additions due to accretion of discount |
| 61 | 211 | 272 | ||||||||||||
Deductions due to payments |
(3,146 | ) | (5 | ) | (1,243 | ) | (4,394 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at March 31, 2003 |
249 | 1,707 | 20,081 | 22,037 | ||||||||||||
Additions due to accretion of discount |
| | 148 | 148 | ||||||||||||
Deductions due to payments |
(236 | ) | (55 | ) | (1,217 | ) | (1,508 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2003 |
$ | 13 | $ | 1,652 | $ | 19,012 | $ | 20,677 | ||||||||
Deductions reflect total cash payments of $8.5 million through June 30, 2003, representing termination benefits and satellite and transponder contractual obligations. Additions reflect accretion through June 30, 2003, of $420,000 representing accretion on our satellite, transponder and facility lease obligations.
4. Program license fees
Program license fees are comprised of the following:
As of December 31, | As of June 30, | ||||||||
2002 | 2003 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Program license fees Hallmark Entertainment
Distribution |
$ | 82,910 | $ | 94,045 | |||||
Program license fees NICC |
| 6,215 | |||||||
Program license fees other affiliates |
8,341 | 8,341 | |||||||
Program license fees non-affiliates |
130,656 | 160,950 | |||||||
Prepaid program license fees |
9,500 | 8,950 | |||||||
Program license fees, at cost |
231,407 | 278,501 | |||||||
Accumulated amortization |
(83,430 | ) | (112,540 | ) | |||||
Program license fees, net of
accumulated amortization |
$ | 147,977 | $ | 165,961 | |||||
Programming costs for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, were $22.2 million and $24.1 million, respectively. Programming costs for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, were $46.0 million and $47.5 million, respectively. Amortization of program license fees, included as a component of programming cost, was $22.0 million and $22.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003. Amortization of program license fees, included as a component of programming cost, was $45.3 million and $46.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003.
License fees payable are comprised of the following:
As of December 31, | As of June 30, | ||||||||
2002 | 2003 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
License fees payable Hallmark Entertainment
Distribution |
$ | 68,243 | $ | 85,501 | |||||
License fees payable NICC |
| 2,781 | |||||||
License fees payable other affiliates |
90 | | |||||||
License fees payable non-affiliates |
89,858 | 91,404 | |||||||
Total license fees payable |
158,191 | 179,686 | |||||||
Less current maturies |
(58,756 | ) | (77,992 | ) | |||||
License fees payable, net of current portion |
$ | 99,435 | $ | 101,694 | |||||
14
5. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are comprised of the following:
As of December 31, | As of June 30, | Depreciable | |||||||||||
2002 | 2003 | Lives | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | (In years) | ||||||||||||
Technical equipment and computers |
$ | 38,584 | $ | 39,862 | 3-5 | ||||||||
Leased asset |
13,252 | 13,252 | 8 | ||||||||||
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
2,162 | 2,136 | 5 | ||||||||||
Leasehold improvements |
8,215 | 9,320 | 3-7 | ||||||||||
Construction-in-progress |
1,520 | 931 | |||||||||||
Property and equipment, at cost |
63,733 | 65,501 | |||||||||||
Accumulated depreciation and
amortization |
(28,121 | ) | (33,768 | ) | |||||||||
Property and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation |
$ | 35,612 | $ | 31,733 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment totaled $3.0 million and $2.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense related to property and equipment totaled $5.2 million and $5.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, respectively. Software and other intangible assets have been included in prepaids and other in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Amortization expense related to software and other intangibles was $200,000 and $600,000, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003. Amortization expense related to software and other intangibles was $600,000 and $1.4 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003.
6. Credit Facility and Private Placement
Credit Facility
In connection with the completion of the purchase of the film assets, Crown Media Holdings entered into a credit agreement with a syndicate of banks, led by JP Morgan Chase Bank, under which the banks have extended to Crown Media Holdings, a five-year $320.0 million secured credit facility. At June 30, 2003, Crown Media Holdings had borrowed all funds available under the credit facility. The entire balance is due in 2006 and, therefore, is classified as a long-term liability in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. This loan is guaranteed by Crown Media Holdings subsidiaries and is secured by all tangible and intangible property of Crown Media Holdings and its subsidiaries.
The bank credit facility encompasses a term loan of $100.0 million and a revolving line of credit of $220.0 million, up to $20.0 million of which can be letters of credit issued at the request of Crown Media Holdings. Each loan (which includes the term loans and any revolving credit loans) bears interest at a Eurodollar rate or an alternate base rate as Crown Media Holdings may request in accordance with the credit agreement. The Eurodollar rate is based on the London interbank market for Eurodollars, and remains in effect for the time period of the loan ranging from one, two, three, six or twelve months. The alternate rate is based upon the prime rate of JP Morgan Chase Bank, a certificate of deposit rate or the federal funds effective rate, which is adjusted whenever the rate changes.
Amounts under the revolver have accrued interest at rates from 4.73% to 5.14% and amounts under the term loan have accrued interest at rates from 4.84% to 5.11% for the six months ended June 30, 2002. Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, was $2.8 million and $5.1 million, respectively. Amounts under the revolver have accrued interest at rates from 4.06% to 4.44% and amounts under the term loan have accrued interest at rates from 4.06% to 4.42% for the six months ended June 30, 2003. Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, was $3.5 million and $7.0 million, respectively. At December 31, 2002, and June 30, 2003, accrued interest of $596,000 and $308,000, respectively, was reflected in the current portion of the credit facility in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
See Note 9, Subsequent Events, below for information on the August 5, 2003, repayment of approximately $67.4 million of bank revolving credit loans, interest and prepayment penalties.
Private Placement
On December 17, 2001, Crown Media Holdings completed a $265.0 million private placement to a group of institutional investors. Under the terms of the private placement, Crown Media Holdings issued units to the investors, each unit consisted of one preferred security of Crown Media Trust, and one contingent appreciation certificate, issued by Crown Media Holdings. The financing was recorded at $265.0 million and required the allocation of fair value to the various components based on the terms of the private placement agreement. Crown Media Holdings calculated the guaranteed preferred beneficial interest portion of the preferred securities using an internal rate of return analysis (cumulative present value of expected future cash flows) on the preferred securities. The carrying value of the guaranteed preferred beneficial interest was $221.6 million on December 31, 2002, and was $236.2 million on June 30, 2003, net of unamortized offering costs.
15
Crown Media Holdings calculated the initial value of the contingent appreciation certificate portion of the preferred securities by using Black-Scholes models and by using a combination of put and call options that would provide the same future payout as the convertible debt portion. The resulting value of the contingent appreciation certificates, net of embedded derivatives, was $47.9 million as of December 31, 2002, and $50.8 million as of June 30, 2003, which has been classified as convertible debt on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The transaction also resulted in a net derivative liability of $762,000 as of December 31, 2002, and $2.0 million as of June 30, 2003.
The following table summarizes the transaction as of the transaction date, as of December 31, 2002, and as of June 30, 2003. The summary also reflects the allocation of transaction costs between the various components of the financing.
Initial | As of | As of | ||||||||||||
Fair Value | December 31, | June 30, | ||||||||||||
Allocation | 2002 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Convertible debt
Value of contingent appreciation certificates |
$ | 93,682 | ||||||||||||
Value of embedded derivative |
(50,212 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total carrying amount of convertible debt(a)(b) |
$ | 43,470 | $ | 47,916 | $ | 50,816 | ||||||||
Derivative liability(c) |
$ | 12,083 | $ | 762 | $ | 1,962 | ||||||||
Allocable offering costs included in debt issuance
costs(d) |
$ | (2,444 | ) | $ | (2,020 | ) | $ | (1,815 | ) | |||||
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest in Crown Media
Trusts debentures |
$ | 209,447 | $ | 245,241 | $ | 266,363 | ||||||||
Distribution to holders of guaranteed preferred beneficial
interest in Crown Media Trusts debentures |
| (14,730 | ) | (22,137 | ) | |||||||||
Allocable offering costs(e) |
(11,771 | ) | (8,960 | ) | (8,064 | ) | ||||||||
Total carrying value of guaranteed preferred beneficial
interest(b)(f) |
$ | 197,676 | $ | 221,551 | $ | 236,162 | ||||||||
Net proceeds allocated to securities sold |
$ | 250,785 | ||||||||||||
Gross proceeds from private placement |
$ | 265,000 | ||||||||||||
Offering costs |
(14,215 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net proceeds allocated to securities sold |
$ | 250,785 | ||||||||||||
(a) | Accreting principal to $45.6 million plus additional 11.25% interest to meet minimum return requirements over six years. | |
(b) | Interest payable at 6.75% per annum in cash each quarter. Balance due at anticipated redemption on December 17, 2007. | |
(c) | Marked to fair value through income (loss) at each reporting date. | |
(d) | Amortizing to interest expense over six years. | |
(e) | Accreting to guaranteed preferred beneficial interest over six years. | |
(f) | Accreting principal to $219.4 million plus additional 11.25% interest to meet minimum return requirements over six years. |
See Note 9, Subsequent Events, below for information on the August 5, 2003, repurchase of all of the preferred securities by Crown Media Holdings.
7. Related Party Transactions
Demand Notes
On December 14, 2001, the Company executed a promissory note, in the amount of $75.0 million payable to HC Crown in replacement of the promissory note with HC Crown dated September 28, 2001. This note may be borrowed against or prepaid without penalty and has a final maturity date no later than December 21, 2007. The line of credit is subordinate to the bank credit facility, and its availability may be reduced dollar for dollar in an amount equal to additional capital raised by Crown Media Holdings. The rate of interest under the line of credit is equal to LIBOR plus three percent, payable quarterly. HC Crowns obligation to make loans under this line of credit is supported by an irrevocable letter of credit from Credit Suisse First Boston. As of December 31, 2002, and June 30, 2003, principal borrowings under the note were $5.0 million and $75.0 million included in notes payable to HC Crown on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, respectively, with accrued interest of $10,000 and $1.1 million, respectively, included in interest payable to HC Crown on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Under the $75.0 million note, the Company is obligated to pay a commitment fee of 1.5% of the initial maximum amount of the note through December 31, 2002, which may be paid in cash or by issuing common stock valued at the average closing price of the common stock for the 15 trading days prior to the date the fee is due. The commitment fee is payable in arrears in four equal installments on the last business day of each calendar quarter during 2002. At both December 31, 2002, and June 30, 2003, the $281,000 commitment fee was included in payable to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In December 2002, we issued 123,831 shares as payment for $844,000 of fees.
16
Tax Sharing Agreement
On March 11, 2003, Hallmark Entertainment Holdings, Inc. (Hallmark Entertainment Holdings, a subsidiary wholly owned indirectly by Hallmark Cards) contributed 100% of the Crown Media Holdings shares owned by it to Hallmark Entertainment Investments. Two of Crown Media Holdings investors, Liberty Crown, Inc. (Liberty), a subsidiary of Liberty Media, and JP Morgan, also contributed 100% of their Crown Media Holdings shares to Hallmark Entertainment Investments, and VISN contributed 10% of its Crown Media Holdings shares to Hallmark Entertainment Investments, all in return for Hallmark Entertainment Investments shares. Crown Media Holdings understands that Hallmark Entertainment Investments intends to hold the Crown Media Holdings Shares and to evaluate media investment opportunities in which Crown Media Holdings does not have an interest. Hallmark Entertainment Holdings, as the more than 80% owner of Hallmark Entertainment Investments, has voting power over all of the Crown Media Holdings shares owned by Hallmark Entertainment Investments.
As a result of this transaction, Crown Media Holdings became a member of Hallmark Cards consolidated federal tax group and entered into a federal tax sharing agreement with Hallmark Cards. Hallmark Cards will include Crown Media Holdings in its consolidated federal income tax return. Accordingly, Hallmark Cards will benefit from future tax losses, which may be generated by Crown Media Holdings. Based on the tax sharing agreement, Hallmark Cards will pay Crown Media Holdings all of the benefits realized by Hallmark Cards as a result of consolidation, 75% in cash on a quarterly basis and the balance when Crown Media Holdings becomes a taxpayer. Under this federal tax sharing agreement, at Hallmark Cards option, this 25% balance may also be applied as an offset against any amounts owed by Crown Media Holdings to any member of the Hallmark Cards consolidation group under any loan, line of credit or other payable, subject to limitations under any loan indentures or contracts restricting such offsets.
Through June 30, 2003, the Company received $21.3 million under the tax sharing agreement. These receipts have been recorded as a component of additional paid in capital.
Costs Incurred on Crown Media Holdings Behalf
Since inception, Hallmark Entertainment has at times paid certain costs related to payroll and benefits, insurance, operational and financing expenditures and capital expenditures on behalf of Crown Media Holdings. These transactions are recorded in the books and records of Crown Media Holdings. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, $1.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively, were paid to Hallmark Entertainment. No payments were made during the three months ending June 30, 2003, but $445,000 of intercompany payables were recorded during this period. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, $845,000 was paid to Hallmark Entertainment. Unreimbursed costs and other intercompany payables of $1.1 million and $700,000 are included in payable to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2002, and June 30, 2003, respectively.
Services Agreement with Hallmark Cards
Crown Media Holdings has an intercompany services agreement with Hallmark Cards, which was effective January 1, 2003, under which Hallmark Cards has agreed for a term of three years, subject to cancellation by either party after the first or second year, to provide us with tax, risk management, health safety, environmental, insurance, legal, treasury and cash management services and real estate consulting services. This agreement replaces an intercompany services agreement, which expired on January 1, 2003. Under the new agreement, the Company has agreed to pay Hallmark Cards $515,000 per year for these services, plus out-of-pocket expenses and third party fees, payable in arrears on the last business day of each quarter. Additionally, Hallmark Cards made a payment on Crown Media Holdings behalf for certain expenses in the amount of $500,000 during first quarter 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, Crown Media Holdings had accrued $250,000 and $258,000, respectively, under the agreement. At December 31, 2002, and June 30, 2003, unpaid accrued service fees and other intercompany payables of $5.0 million and $6.4 million, respectively, were included in payable to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Services Agreement with Hallmark Entertainment
Hallmark Entertainment provides Crown Media Holdings with services related to the administration, distribution and other exploitation of the Companys film assets. This service agreement has a term of three years, commencing January 1, 2001, with the right of either party to terminate the agreement after the first year upon 60 days written notice. In consideration for the services provided by Hallmark Entertainment, Crown Media Holdings is obligated to pay a service fee of $1.5 million per year, paid in quarterly installments of $375,000. Crown Media Holdings paid $1.9 million to Hallmark Entertainment for these services in April 2002. Crown Media Holdings paid $375,000 to Hallmark Entertainment during both the first and second quarters of 2003. At
17
December 31, 2002, and June 30, 2003, unpaid accrued service fees of $375,000 were included in payable to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Program License Agreements with Hallmark Entertainment Distribution
Crown Media International has a program license agreement with Hallmark Entertainment Distribution dated January 1, 2001. The agreement expires on December 31, 2005, subject to a renewal through December 31, 2010. Under the terms of the agreement, Crown Media International has the exclusive right to exhibit Hallmark Entertainment Distributions programming in the territories in which Crown Media International operates during three 18-month windows. Crown Media International also has the exclusive right to exhibit programming in markets where it does not currently operate, if it elects to distribute its channel in those markets subject to any third party agreement existing at the time Crown Media International launches in those markets. In addition, under the agreement, Hallmark Entertainment Distribution is generally obligated to sell to Crown Media International all of the programming it produces and Crown Media International is obligated to purchase up to 50 programs produced per year during the term of the agreement.
Crown Media United States also licenses programming for distribution in the United States from Hallmark Entertainment Distribution under a program license agreement, dated January 1, 2001. Under the program agreement, Crown Media United States generally licenses made-for-television movies and miniseries owned or controlled by Hallmark Entertainment Distribution, as well as all programming produced by or on behalf of Hallmark Entertainment Distribution for Crown Media United States. The program agreement has a term of five years and is automatically renewable for additional three-year periods, subject to rate adjustments, so long as Hallmark Entertainment Distribution, as applicable, or its affiliates, owns an interest of 35% or more of Crown Media Holdings. If, at any time, Hallmark Entertainment Distribution ceases to own a 35% interest in Crown Media Holdings, and if, at that time, the remaining term of the program agreement is less than two years, then the remaining term of the program agreement will be extended to the date two years after the date on which Hallmark Entertainment Distribution ceased to own a 35% interest in Crown Media Holdings.
As part of the program license agreements with Hallmark Entertainment Distribution, in the event that either Crown Media United States or Crown Media International sub-licenses any licensed program to a third party, they must equally share with Hallmark Entertainment Distribution the excess, if any, of the sublicensing fee over the initial program license fee paid by the Company. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, Crown Media United States entered into sublicensing arrangements which resulted in $148,000 being payable to Hallmark Entertainment Distribution under this sharing arrangement and which has been included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as payable to affiliates. The Company did not enter into such sublicensing agreements during the period from January 1, 2003, through June 30, 2003. In addition, pursuant to an amendment to the program license agreements, dated as of May 15, 2002, Crown Media United States and Crown Media International authorized Hallmark Entertainment Distribution to solicit and enter into third party license agreements for titles held by them under the program license agreements. In the event that the length of the license sold to such third party exceeds the length of the license held by Crown Media United States or Crown Media International, the fees related to such excess period are to be paid to Hallmark Entertainment Distribution.
Programming costs related to the Hallmark program agreements were $7.3 million and $6.3 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003. Programming costs related to the Hallmark program agreements were $15.2 million and $12.1 million, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003. As of December 31, 2002, and June 30, 2003, $68.2 million and $85.5 million, respectively, are included in license fees payable to affiliates in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In fourth quarter 2002, Crown Media Holdings paid $25.0 million to Hallmark Entertainment Distribution for license fees.
NICC License Agreements
In connection with an investment by Crown Media International in Crown Media United States on November 13, 1998, HEN Domestic Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Crown Media International, and Vision Group, VISN Management Corporation (VISN) and Henson Cable Networks, Inc. signed an amended and restated company agreement governing the operation of Crown Media United States. As of February 22, 2001 and January 1, 2002 the parties agreed to certain amendments to the amended and restated company agreement, as more fully described below. The company agreement was negotiated at arms length with the other party or parties to the agreement.
18
VISN owns a $25.0 million preferred interest in Crown Media United States. Under the amended and restated company agreement, the members agreed that if during any year ending after January 1, 2005 and prior to December 31, 2009, Crown Media United States has net profits in excess of $10.0 million, and the preferred interest has not been redeemed, Crown Media United States will redeem the preferred interest in an amount equal to the lesser of:
| such excess; | ||
| $5.0 million; or | ||
| the amount equal to the preferred liquidation preference on the date of redemption. |
The members also agreed that Crown Media United States will redeem the preferred interest at the preferred interest liquidation preference on the date of redemption of December 31, 2010.
Under the amended and restated company agreement, Crown Media United States may be required to make certain payments to the National Interfaith Cable Coalition (NICC) in relation to the provision of programming by NICC. Prior to the February 2001 amendment, these payments were $3.5 million annually and, so long as VISN owned the preferred interest, $1.5 million multiplied by the quotient of the preferred liquidation preference divided by $25.0 million. Pursuant to the amendment adopted in 2001, Crown Media United States may be required to pay to NICC a total license fee comprised of:
| $5.3 million per year, with Consumer Price Index escalations, for two recurring programming blocks; | ||
| up to $10 million per year for production costs of an additional recurring signature series program block; | ||
| up to $600,000 per non-dramatic holiday special produced by NICC; and | ||
| $1 million per dramatic holiday special co-produced by NICC and Hallmark Entertainment. |
Pursuant to the February 2001 amendment, Crown Media United States is required to broadcast 15 1/2 hours per week of faith and values programming. In addition, NICC may produce or co-produce for Crown Media United States up to six dramatic or non-dramatic holiday specials per year and a signature series. Crown Media United States funds a portion of the production costs of this new programming as described above. In addition, pursuant to the February 2001 amendment, Crown Media United States is required to assist NICC in launching and operating a new channel, which will be distributed by digital satellite and cable. This assistance will include the provision to NICC of management and operation services, with some services at no cost and some services for fees.
In a further amendment to the amended and restated company agreement, which was effective as of January 1, 2002, Crown Media United States agreed to advance NICC $3,000,000 in each of 2002 and 2003 to help fund NICCs cost of expanding its production operations to produce the above-described programming. This advance will be recovered from the license fees payable for this programming.
The term of the obligations contained in the February 2001 amendment expire on March 26, 2006, but may be terminated earlier if NICC sells more than 50% of the Crown Media Holdings shares it owned on February 22, 2001. In addition, six months prior to the expiration of the agreement, Crown Media United States must negotiate in good faith with NICC regarding a continuation of the programming and funding commitment to NICC. If agreement is not reached and Crown Media United States does not continue the NICC programming and funding commitments at the same levels, NICC is entitled to compel Crown Media Holdings to buy all of NICCs Crown Media Holdings shares at their then-current market value no later than 60 days following the expiration of the amendment. Crown Media United States, however, can nullify this put by electing to continue the NICC programming and funding commitments at the same levels. During the three months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, Crown Media United States paid NICC $3.9 million and $674,000, respectively, related to this agreement. During the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2003, Crown Media United States paid NICC $7.0 million and $5.0 million, respectively, related to this agreement.
Under the amended and restated company agreement, Crown Media International may not transfer its interests in Crown Media United States until the fifth anniversary of the agreement, except to one of our affiliates or to another member of Crown Media United States or one of its affiliates. In addition, any transaction between us or any of our affiliates and Crown Media United States must be approved by the Crown Media United States governance committee.
19
8. Operations in Different Geographic Areas
Information relating to Crown Media Holdings continuing operations is set forth in the following table (operating loss is defined as total revenues less cost of services; selling, general and administrative expenses; depreciation and amortization expenses; and marketing expenses).
Revenue from | Revenue from | Loss | ||||||||||||||||
Unrelated | Related | from | Identifiable | |||||||||||||||
Entities | Entities | Operations | Assets | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) | ||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2002: |
||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 13.6 | $ | 1.5 | $ | (24.9 | ) | $ | 573.7 | |||||||||
International |
20.7 | | 8.0 | ) | 81.6 | |||||||||||||
Film Distribution |
3.5 | | (3.6 | ) | 801.4 | |||||||||||||
$ | 37.8 | $ | 1.5 | (36.5 | ) | 1,456.7 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed preferred beneficial accretion |
(1.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense and other, net |
(5.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
$ | (43.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Assets not allocated to segments: |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
5.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
47.9 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated total assets |
$ | 1,509.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Three months ended June 30, 2003: |
||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 19.9 | $ | 0.3 | $ | (23.1 | ) | $ | 586.5 | |||||||||
International |
21.3 | | (1.3 | ) | 72.3 | |||||||||||||
Film Distribution |
3.9 | | (4.1 | ) | 777.4 | |||||||||||||
$ | 45.1 | $ | 0.3 | (28.5 | ) | 1,436.2 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed preferred beneficial accretion |
(12.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense and other, net |
(7.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
$ | (48.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Assets not allocated to segments: |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
8.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
45.9 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated total assets |
$ | 1,490.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2002: |
||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 27.0 | $ | 2.7 | $ | (47.4 | ) | $ | 573.7 | |||||||||
International |
38.6 | | (22.6 | ) | 81.6 | |||||||||||||
Film Distribution |
10.5 | | (5.3 | ) | 801.4 | |||||||||||||
$ | 76.1 | $ | 2.7 | (75.3 | ) | 1,456.7 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed preferred beneficial accretion |
(11.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense and other, net |
(11.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
$ | (98.9 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Assets not allocated to segments: |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
5.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
47.9 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated total assets |
$ | 1,509.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, 2003: |
||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 39.3 | $ | 0.7 | $ | (38.0 | ) | $ | 586.5 | |||||||||
International |
40.0 | | (9.7 | ) | 72.3 | |||||||||||||
Film Distribution |
7.4 | | (8.7 | ) | 777.4 | |||||||||||||
$ | 86.7 | $ | 0.7 | (56.4 | ) | 1,436.2 | ||||||||||||
Guaranteed preferred beneficial accretion |
(23.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Interest expense and other, net |
(14.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
$ | (94.5 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Assets not allocated to segments: |
||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
8.3 | |||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
45.9 | |||||||||||||||||
Consolidated total assets |
$ | 1,490.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Some of the markets in which the Company operates, including the Asian market, the South American market, Turkey and Russia, have experienced some or all of the following conditions: volatile currency exchange rates, volatile political conditions, and reduced or volatile economic activity. Crown Media Holdings operations have and will continue to be affected in the foreseeable future by economic conditions in these regions.
British Sky Broadcasting accounted for 14% of our consolidated revenues for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. David J. Evans, the Companys President and Chief Executive Officer, currently serves as a director on British Sky Broadcastings Board. No individual pay television distributor accounted for 10% of our consolidated subscribers for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003.
20
9. Subsequent Events
Senior Unsecured Note
On August 5, 2003, Crown Media Holdings repurchased all of the preferred securities of Crown Media Trust and related contingent appreciation certificates issued by the Company. The securities were repurchased for approximately $329.1 million, including approximately $2.4 million of cash distributions on the preferred securities through August 5, 2003, and a call premium of approximately $30.5 million. Funds for this repurchase were obtained from the proceeds of a $400.0 million 10.25% senior unsecured discount note issued to HC Crown. After repayment of certain expenses for the issuance including a fee of $3.0 million to HC Crown, the Company used the balance of the proceeds of the note, approximately $67.4 million, to pay principal, interest and prepayment penalties on its bank revolving credit loans.
The senior unsecured note provides for no cash interest payments for four years; instead, the principal amount of the note accretes at 10.25% per annum, compounding semi-annually, to $596.6 million at August 5, 2007. From that date, interest at 10.25% per annum will be payable semi-annually on the accreted value of the note. The note matures on August 5, 2011, and is callable by Crown Media Holdings at any time after August 5, 2004, without penalty.
A special independent committee of the Board of Directors of Crown Media Holdings negotiated and approved the terms of the senior unsecured note and related documents. The special committee also considered alternative financing options to raise funds for the same purposes.
Amendment No. 6 to the bank credit facility of Crown Media Holdings permits the sale of the 10.25% note, permits the repurchase of the preferred securities and amends certain financial covenants of Crown Media Holdings, including levels of EBITDA, the base amount used in the calculation of the required minimum net worth and a maximum leverage ratio. The Company also amended its tax sharing agreement with Hallmark Cards to provide that no interest expense or income related to the 10.25% note will be used in calculating taxes under the agreement until (and to the extent) payments on the 10.25% note are made to HC Crown in cash. This amendment defers payments by Hallmark Cards to Crown Media Holdings under the tax sharing agreement related to the 10.25% note until Crown Media Holdings makes cash payments of interest on the note.
Dissolution of Crown Media Trust
On August 5, 2003, Crown Media Holdings filed a Certificate of Cancellation with the Delaware Secretary of State to dissolve its Crown Media Trust subsidiary.
Lease and Sublease Agreements
On July 9, 2003, Crown Media International entered into an agreement to sublease 24,434 square feet of its Greenwood Village office space. The sublease commences on September 1, 2003, and ends on September 10, 2008. On June 26, 2003, Crown Media International also entered into an agreement to lease an additional 7,855 square feet of office space in the same building. The lease commences on August 1, 2003, and ends on October 1, 2008.
In July 2003, Hallmark Entertainment and Crown Media International entered into a 5-year sublease agreement to provide space to Crown Media International in Hallmark Entertainments New York office on the same general terms and conditions Hallmark Entertainment has on its underlying lease. This sublease is subject to approval by Crown Media Holdings Board of Directors.
Italy
On August 1, 2003, the Company did not renew its contract with its existing customer in Italy. The Company had $138,000 and $277,000 of revenue during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, from this customer. The Company has $3.9 million of programming and other assets related to the Italian market. Crown Media Holdings is exploring the sale of these assets, but there is no assurance that any recovery will be made.
21
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Revenue
Our revenue consists of subscriber fees, advertising and film license fees. Subscriber fees are generally payable to us on a per subscriber basis by pay television distributors for the right to carry our channels. In the United States, we pay certain television distributors up-front subscriber acquisition fees to carry our channel. However, such payments are not common in the international cable television markets. Subscriber acquisition fees incurred are capitalized and amortized over the term of the applicable distribution agreement as a reduction in subscriber fee revenue. If the amortization expense exceeds the revenue recognized on a per distributor basis, the excess amortization is included as a component of cost of services. At the time we sign a distribution agreement, and periodically thereafter, we evaluate the recoverability of the costs we incur against the revenue directly associated with each agreement.
Subscriber fees vary according to:
| the level of sophistication and degree of competition in the market; | ||
| the relative position in the market of the distributor and the popularity of the channel; | ||
| the packaging arrangements for the channel; and | ||
| other commercial terms such as granting the distributor exclusivity to carry our channel (only in territories outside the U.S.) and length of term of the contract. |
In some circumstances, international distributors provide minimum revenue guarantees.
We are in continuous negotiations both with our existing distributors and new distributors to increase our subscriber base. In the United States, we are often subject to requests by distributors to pay subscriber acquisition fees for these additional subscribers or to waive or accept lower subscriber fees if certain numbers of additional subscribers are provided. In both domestic and international markets we also may help fund the distributors efforts to market our channels or we may permit distributors to offer limited promotional periods without payment of subscriber fees. As we continue our efforts to add subscribers, our subscriber revenue will continue to be negatively affected by these subscriber acquisition fee expense, discounted subscriber fees and other payments; however, we believe that the resulting increase in subscribers will allow us to attract additional advertisers and command higher advertising rates.
Several of Crown Media United States existing distribution agreements contain most favored nations clauses. These clauses typically provide that, in the event Crown Media United States enters into an agreement with another distributor on more favorable terms, these terms must be offered to the existing distributor, subject to certain exceptions and conditions. In August 2001, Crown Media United States entered into a new distribution agreement with DirecTV under which the Hallmark Channel was repositioned to DirecTVs TOTAL CHOICE® Package and our subscribers increased significantly. Several other distributors, whose agreements contain most favored nations provisions, have indicated an interest in some or all of the DirecTV terms. Crown Media United States is currently in discussions with several of these distributors and has amended its agreement with one of the distributors to settle the most favored nations provisions. Any further modification of these existing agreements to adopt the DirecTV terms, or any other new terms, could result in the payment of cash or the issuance of stock by Crown Media Holdings and will negatively affect subscriber revenue and increase operating expenses.
On November 7, 2002, we entered into an amendment of a distribution agreement with a large distributor in the United States. The amendment extended the distribution agreement for two years to December 31, 2007, and provided for the payment of a substantial cash amount in settlement of the most favored nation clauses in regard to the DirecTV terms and significantly increases the distributors commitment to add full-time subscribers to our Channel. We paid a portion of the amount upon execution and will make monthly cash payments through December 1, 2003, for the balance. We are also required to pay a substantial market support payment, based on subscribers exceeding a final commitment number, through December 31, 2004. In addition, if the final commitment level of subscribers is achieved by the distributor, subscriber fees will not apply to subscribers above a specified number. The amendment also contains a most favored nation provision relating to other distribution agreements.
22
The Company is in discussions with a primary pay television distributor in Spain who has attempted to terminate an existing distribution agreement with the Hallmark Channel. The outcome can not be predicted.
Advertising sales generally are made on the basis of a price per advertising spot or per unit of audience measurement (for example, a ratings point). Prices vary on a market-by-market basis. Rates differ among markets depending on audience demographics.
In markets where regular audience measurements are available, our advertising rates are generally calculated on the basis of an agreed upon price per unit of audience measurement in return for a guaranteed investment level by the advertiser. In these countries, we commit to provide advertisers certain rating levels in connection with their advertising. Revenue is recorded net of estimated shortfalls, which are usually settled by providing the advertiser additional advertising time. In other markets, our advertising rates are calculated on the basis of cost per advertising spot or package of advertising spots, and the price varies by audience level expected (but not measured) during a particular time slot. This is the predominant arrangement in the countries outside the United States in which we sell advertising time. Advertising rates also vary by time of year based on seasonal changes in television viewership.
Crown Media Distribution generates revenue from the film assets by granting licenses to exhibit the films to third parties. We are also using the films as programming for our television channels.
Cost of Services
Our cost of services consists primarily of program license fees, amortization of our film assets, subscriber acquisition fee expense, the cost of signal distribution, dubbing and subtitling, and the cost of promotional segments that are aired between programs. We expect cost of services to continue to increase in the future as we expand our existing markets and third party programming to support our advertising strategy.
In connection with our purchase of film assets from Hallmark Entertainment Distribution, we have signed a service agreement with Hallmark Entertainment. Under the service agreement, Hallmark Entertainment is providing services to us to assist in the administration, distribution and other exploitation of the film assets, and we pay Hallmark Entertainment approximately $1.5 million per year for the three-year term of the agreement ending on December 31, 2003.
Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies
Our financial statements are presented on the basis that Crown Media Holdings is a going concern. Our accounting policies are also determined on this basis.
In the ordinary course of business, our management has made a number of judgments, estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of results of operations and financial condition in the preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates under different assumptions and conditions. The following discussion addresses certain accounting policies involving changes since December 31, 2002.
2002 Reorganization and Other Charges
On October 7, 2002, the Company announced its intention to reorganize its operations to localize and concentrate its efforts on the Hallmark Channel in the U.S. and in its most successful international markets. The Company completed localizing its operating and non-technical support functions formerly located in the Companys U.S. based offices and has transferred those responsibilities to regional staff and/or outsourced them. The Company has entered into an agreement with a local distribution partner, Pramer, who is now responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Hallmark Channel in Latin America (Mexico, Central America and South America). By April 2003, our workforce was reduced by approximately 30% or 130 positions.
We recorded a charge of $28.8 million during the fourth quarter of 2002 reflecting the reorganization. This charge was comprised of a charge of $5.5 million for severance costs and charges of $23.3 million related to satellite and facility exit costs.
For information on other critical accounting policies including revenue recognition, program license fees paid by us, film assets, property and equipment, subscriber acquisition fees, private placement and goodwill, please see Note 2 to the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Report and Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies in Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
23
Tax Sharing Agreement
On March 11, 2003, Crown Media Holdings became a member of Hallmark Cards consolidated federal tax group and entered into a federal tax sharing agreement with Hallmark Cards. Hallmark Cards will include Crown Media Holdings in its consolidated federal income tax return. Accordingly, Hallmark Cards will benefit from future tax losses, which may be generated by Crown Media Holdings. Based on the tax sharing agreement, Hallmark Cards will pay Crown Media Holdings all of the benefits realized by Hallmark Cards as a result of consolidation, 75% in cash on a quarterly basis and the balance as Crown Media Holdings becomes a taxpayer. Under this federal tax sharing agreement, at Hallmark Cards option, this 25% balance may also be applied as an offset against any amounts owed by Crown Media Holdings to any member of the Hallmark Cards consolidation group under any loan, line of credit or other payable, subject to any limitations under any loan indentures or contracts restricting such offsets. The Company amended its tax sharing agreement with Hallmark Cards to provide that no interest expense or income related to the 10.25% note will be used in calculating taxes under the agreement until (and to the extent) payments on the 10.25% note are made to HC Crown in cash. This amendment defers payments by Hallmark Cards to Crown Media Holdings under the tax sharing agreement related to the 10.25% note until Crown Media Holdings makes cash payments of interest on the note.
We account for income taxes as if Crown Media Holdings were a separate taxpayer. Accordingly, Hallmark Cards ability to use our tax losses does not impact our assessment of the need for a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets, including future tax losses. Any payments received from Hallmark Cards under the tax sharing agreement are recorded as an increase in paid-in capital. Through August 5, 2003, the Company received $32.0 million under the tax sharing agreement. These receipts have been recorded as a component of paid-in capital.
Effects of Transactions with Related and Certain Other Parties
Tax Sharing Agreement
Please refer to above Discussion of Critical Accounting Policies.
Employee Incentives and Retention
Please see Employees Incentives and Retention in Note 2 to the Condensed Notes to the Unconsolidated Financial Statements included in this Report for information regarding an exchange of stock options for restricted stock units with senior management and vice presidents and regarding a cash payment award of $1.00 for each share subject to outstanding options held by other employees.
NICC License Agreement
In the first quarter of 2003, we signed an amendment to the arrangement with NICC effective as of January 1, 2002. Under this amendment, Crown Media United States agreed to advance NICC $3,000,000 in each of 2002 and 2003 to help fund NICCs cost of expanding its production operations to produce the programming. This advance is recoverable from the license fees payable for this programming.
Pramer Agreement
On January 30, 2003, Crown Media International entered into an agreement with Pramer S.C.A., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Liberty Media Corporation, under which Pramer provides affiliate and advertising sales representation services, as well as programming, production and technical services in connection with the distribution of the Hallmark Channel in Central and South America. Pramer receives a 35% commission on advertising sales and a 20% commission on affiliate sales and is reimbursed for its costs of providing production and technical services. The agreement with Pramer will terminate on December 31, 2005, unless certain early termination rights arise and are exercised. One of our Board members, David Koff, has been the Senior Vice President of Liberty Media Corporation, one of our significant investors, since 1998.
Senior Unsecured Note
On August 5, 2003, Crown Media Holdings repurchased all of the preferred securities of Crown Media Trust and related contingent appreciation certificates issued by the Company. The securities were repurchased for approximately $329.1 million,
24
including approximately $2.4 million of cash distributions on the preferred securities through August 5, 2003. Funds for this repurchase were obtained from the proceeds of a $400.0 million 10.25% senior unsecured discount note issued to HC Crown. After repayment of certain expenses for the issuance including a fee of $3.0 million to HC Crown, the Company used the balance of the proceeds of the note, approximately $67.4 million, to pay principal, interest and prepayment penalties on its bank revolving credit loans.
The senior unsecured note provides for no cash interest payments for four years; instead, the principal amount of the note accretes at 10.25% per annum, compounding semi-annually, to $596.6 million at August 5, 2007. From that date, interest at 10.25% per annum will be payable semi-annually on the accreted value of the note. The note matures on August 5, 2011, and is callable by Crown Media Holdings at any time after August 5, 2004, without penalty.
A special independent committee of the Board of Directors of Crown Media Holdings negotiated and approved the terms of the senior unsecured note and related documents. The special committee also considered alternative financing options to raise funds for the same purposes.
See Related Party Transactions in Note 7 to Condensed Notes of Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report. Transactions with related parties are also described in Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. Other than as described above, there have not been any new transactions with related parties during the quarter ended June 30, 2003.
Results of Operations
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 Compared to Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2002
Revenue. Total revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, increased to $45.4 million and $87.4 million from $39.3 million and $78.8 million, which represent increases of $6.1 million, or 16%, and $8.6 million, or 11%, respectively, over the comparable periods in 2002. Subscriber fee revenue increased to $17.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003, from $17.0 million, which represents an increase of $903,000, or 5%, over the comparable period in 2002. Subscriber fee revenue decreased to $33.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, from $34.9 million, which represents a decrease of $978,000, or 3%, over the comparable period in 2002. The increased subscriber fee revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2003, resulted primarily from increased distribution of our channel internationally. The decreased subscriber fee revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2003, resulted from reduced subscriber fee rates in the United States due to amendments in prior periods to long-term distribution agreements and cash-basis accounting treatment of certain countries in Latin America. This decrease in revenue is offset in part by an increase in subscriber fee revenue resulting from expanded distribution internationally. Subscriber acquisition fee expense recorded as a reduction of revenue were $1.5 million and $2.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, and $1.9 million and $3.8 million for the comparable periods in 2002. Although the number of subscribers to the Hallmark Channel increased as of June 30, 2003, compared to June 30, 2002, subscriber revenue was also affected by a number of other, offsetting factors, including concessions for new subscribers, and the waiver of subscriber fees and bulk discounts resulting from the attainment of certain subscriber levels. The number of subscribers to the Hallmark Channel worldwide, as of June 30, 2003, was 108.6 million compared to 94.4 million as of June 30, 2002, which represents an increase of 14.2 million, or 15%. Subscribers to our domestic channel increased from 46.7 million as of June 30, 2002, to 51.8 million as of June 30, 2003, which represents an increase of 5.1 million, or 11%. Ninety-one percent of subscriber fees revenue for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, and 79% and 77% of subscriber fee revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, were earned internationally. The amount of net subscriber fee revenue was $1.6 million and $3.0 million for the domestic Hallmark Channel for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, and $3.5 million and $7.9 for the international Hallmark Channel for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. Increased subscriber acquisition costs and other factors described above are expected to continue to result in a decline in net domestic subscriber revenue. Certain of our international subscriber fee rates have and will continue to decrease as we renew distribution agreements, which may provide for lower per subscriber rates than under previous agreements. International fees per subscriber are also expected to experience continuing downward pressure in the future due to the competitive nature of the industry, the growth of digital cable, the shift in the industry in certain more developed countries from subscriber fees revenue to advertising revenue, foreign currency devaluation associated with global economies and the economic turbulence in certain of our markets.
Advertising revenue increased to $23.7 million and $46.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, from $18.9 million and $33.4 million, which represent increases of $4.8 million, or 26%, and $12.6 million, or 38%, respectively, over the comparable periods in 2002. The increase in advertising revenue reflects the following during 2003: the growth of both domestic and international subscribers; higher ratings in the United States and in the United Kingdom; higher advertising rates resulting from
25
the increase in distribution and viewership; and expanded sales of advertising time primarily in the United States and the United Kingdom. Advertising revenue from our domestic channel was $18.6 million and $36.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, compared to $11.7 million and $21.9 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. Additionally, the number of advertisers on our domestic channel rose from 164 at June 30, 2002, to 195 at June 30, 2003.
Among the 50 ad-supported cable channels in the United States market, the Hallmark Channel ranked 13th in total day with a 0.5 household rating for the second quarter of 2003 and 21st for primetime with a 0.7 household rating for the same time period.
During the fourth quarter of 2001, we began earning film licensing fees revenue from our purchased film assets. In addition to our use of these film assets on our channels, we are generating film licensing fee revenue as we establish ourselves in the program distribution market. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, we earned film licensing fee revenue of $3.9 million and $7.4 million, respectively, as compared to $3.5 million and $10.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. This decrease in licensing fees earned during the six months ended June 30, 2003, is due to the timing of license period start dates. We expect our licensing fees to increase in third quarter 2003 as compared to the third quarter of 2002, due to certain existing agreements.
Cost of services. Cost of services for the three months ended June 30, 2003, were $50.3 million and for the three months ended June 30, 2002, were $50.5 million . Cost of services for the six months ended June 30, 2003, decreased to $98.2 million from $100.1 million, which represents a decrease of $1.9 million, or 2%, over the comparable period in 2002. Cost of services as a percent of net revenue decreased to 111% and 112% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, as compared to 128% and 127% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002. These decreases were primarily due to our increases in total revenue discussed above and the changes in operating expenses explained below.
Total programming costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, increased 8% and 3%, respectively, due to acquisitions of programming for our domestic and United Kingdom channels. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, amortization of our film assets was $6.8 million and $13.6 million, as compared to $5.5 million and $12.7 million in 2002, respectively. The increase in amortization of film assets was primarily due to our use of a higher amortization rate for our film assets.
Subscriber acquisition fee expense was $6.6 million and $12.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, as compared to $5.3 million and $9.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. Expanded distribution agreements from prior periods in the U.S. resulted in the increases in subscriber acquisition fee expense experienced during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. Operating costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, which include playback, dubbing and subtitling, transponder and interstitial expenses, decreased 29% and 25%, respectively, primarily as a result of lower salary, benefit, satellite and transponder expenses resulting from our 2002 reorganization.
Selling, general and administrative expense. Selling, general and administrative expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, decreased to $12.3 million and $26.5 million, respectively, from $12.4 million and $29.0 million, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, which represent decreases of $129,000, or 1%, and $2.5 million, or 9%, for the three and six months periods, respectively. These decreases resulted from a reduction in salary, benefit, consulting and travel expenses. Salary and benefit expenses declined as a result of the termination of certain high-level positions during 2002 in conjunction with our 2002 reorganization. Our continuing use of teleconferencing resulted in lower travel expenses. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of total revenue decreased to 27% and 30% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, as compared to 32% and 37% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. These decreases were also due to the increases in total revenue noted above.
Marketing expense. Marketing expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, decreased to $8.7 million and $14.2 million, respectively, from $10.5 million and $20.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, which represent decreases of $1.8 million, or 17%, and $6.2 million, or 30%, for the three and six month periods, respectively. Marketing expense declined during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, primarily due to more efficient media buys for our domestic channel in 2003 as compared to 2002. Additionally, marketing expenses were higher in 2002 due to the amplified efforts to promote the premieres of Adoption and Stranded on our domestic channel.
Depreciation and amortization expense. Depreciation and amortization expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, increased to $2.6 million and $5.1 million, respectively, from $2.4 million and $4.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively, which represent increases of $227,000, or 9%, and $430,000, or 9%, for the three and six month periods, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense was higher for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, primarily due to expenditures for our Network Operations Center to accommodate the launch of our domestic channel in the first quarter 2003, and our new domestic and international channel websites being placed into service during that period.
26
Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest accretion. Guaranteed preferred beneficial interest accretion for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, was $12.2 million and $23.2 million, respectively, as compared to $1.2 million and $11.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. This expense related to future obligations on our debentures issued on December 17, 2001, in connection with the preferred securities of Crown Media Trust. We recorded losses of $944,000 and $1.2 million due to the revaluing of our derivative liabilities to fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, respectively, which have been included as a component of the accretion of guaranteed preferred beneficial interest. We recorded gains of $7.6 million and $5.4 million, due to the revaluing of our derivative liabilities to fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. We will no longer record guaranteed preferred beneficial interest accretion due to the repurchase of our preferred securities on August 5, 2003, and the accounting treatment of our private placement securities under SFAS No. 150 for the period July 1, 2003, through August 5, 2003.
Interest income (expense) and other, net. Net interest and other expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, increased to $7.5 million and $14.9 million, respectively, from $5.7 million and $11.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, which represent increases of $1.8 million and $3.1 million for the three and six month periods, respectively. These increases were primarily due to increased borrowings under our credit facility and the HC Crown line of credit and interest on our convertible debt.
We expect our interest expense to significantly increase due to the factors listed above, a loss associated with the above-described repurchase of the preferred securities and contingent appreciation certificates on August 5, 2003, and the accounting treatment of our preferred securities under SFAS No. 150 for the period July 1, 2003, through August 5, 2003.
Income tax provision. Income tax provision for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, increased to $1.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, from $643,000 and $1.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, which represent increases of $557,000, or 87%, and $347,000, or 29%, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2002, respectively. These increases were due to an increase in taxes on the foreign income resulting from higher international film licensing fee revenue.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash used in operating activities was $73.4 million and $94.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Cash was used primarily to fund operating expenditures related to net losses of $96.1 million and $100.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease from 2002 to 2003 was primarily due to substantially higher domestic and UK advertising revenue and resulting cash receipts, and lower salaries in 2003. This decrease was partially offset by increased programming purchased in our U.S. and UK markets to meet our strategy and the demands of our customers and higher subscriber acquisition fee payments as a result of our expanded distribution in domestic markets.
Cash used in investing activities was $1.7 million and $760,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Cash used increased primarily due to expenditures for our Network Operations Center to accommodate the launch of our domestic channel in the first quarter 2003 and our new domestic and international channel websites being placed into service during that period.
Cash provided by financing activities was $83.2 million and $86.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. In the six month period ending June 30, 2003, we have received proceeds of $21.3 million from our tax sharing agreement with Hallmark Cards and borrowed $70.0 million on our line with HC Crown to meet our operating demands. In 2002, we borrowed funds under the credit facility and the HC Crown note to meet our operating demands.
27
The following table aggregates all of our contractual commitments as of June 30, 2003, and incorporates the events subsequent to June 30, 2003, described in footnote 9 to the Condensed Notes to Unconsolidated Financial Statements.
Scheduled Payments by Period | |||||||||||||||||||||
Less | After | ||||||||||||||||||||
Than | 2-3 | 4-5 | 5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | 1 Year | Years | Years | Years | ||||||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt |
$ | 253.0 | $ | 0.3 | $ | | $ | 252.7 | $ | | |||||||||||
HC Crown Line of Credit |
75.0 | | | 75.0 | | ||||||||||||||||
HC Crown 10.25% Note Principal |
400.0 | | | | 400.0 | ||||||||||||||||
HC Crown 10.25% Note Accretion |
196.6 | | | | 196.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Interest Payments |
4.0 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.7 | | ||||||||||||||||
Capital Lease Obligations |
10.0 | 1.5 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 1.1 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating Leases |
89.5 | 16.8 | 33.3 | 22.8 | 16.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Long-Term Obligations
Program license fees payable to
non-affiliates and NICC |
94.2 | 52.7 | 41.5 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Program license fees payable to
Hallmark Entertainment Distribution |
85.5 | (a) | 25.3 | | 60.2 | | |||||||||||||||
Program license fees payable for future
windows |
155.7 | 34.8 | 98.1 | 12.1 | 10.7 | ||||||||||||||||
Subscriber acquisition fees (b) |
25.5 | 24.0 | 1.5 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Payable to Hallmark Entertainment
Holdings |
52.1 | (c) | | | 52.1 | | |||||||||||||||
Payable to Hallmark Entertainment |
47.9 | (c) | | | 47.9 | | |||||||||||||||
Redeemable Preferred Minority Interest |
25.0 | | 25.0 | | | ||||||||||||||||
Total Contractual Cash Obligations |
$ | 1,514.0 | $ | 156.5 | $ | 204.0 | $ | 528.5 | $ | 625.0 | |||||||||||
(a) | Can only be paid with certain prescribed sources of funds as defined in the private placement agreement, assuming such funds are available. | |
(b) | We executed in early November 2002 an amendment to a distribution agreement with one of our domestic distributors. This agreement and any other amendments to current domestic distribution agreements will significantly increase subscriber acquisition fees payable. | |
(c) | Can only be paid subsequent to repayment of credit facility per agreement. |
In connection with the Companys growth strategy, the Company expects to continue making investments in programming and distribution during the remainder of 2003. Programming expenditures for the remainder of 2003 are expected to be in the range of $40.0 million to $50.0 million, and cash payments for subscriber acquisition fees for the remainder of 2003 are expected to be $25.0 million to $35.0 million. Through June 30, 2003 the Company has expended $42.6 million for programming and $24.2 million for subscriber acquisition fees. If necessary, the Company believes it has discretion to reduce some of this anticipated spending. The Companys principal uses of funds during the remainder of 2003 are expected to be the payment of operating expenses, payments for licensing of programming from third parties and subscriber acquisition fees, and interest payments under its bank credit facility.
On August 5, 2003, Crown Media Holdings repurchased all of the preferred securities of Crown Media Trust and related contingent appreciation certificates issued by the Company. The securities were repurchased for approximately $329.1 million, including approximately $2.4 million of cash distributions on the preferred securities through August 5, 2003. Funds for this repurchase were obtained from the proceeds of a $400.0 million 10.25% senior unsecured discount note issued to HC Crown Corp., a subsidiary of Hallmark Cards. After the payment of certain expenses for the issuance including a fee of $3.0 million to HC Crown, the Company used the balance of the proceeds of the note, approximately $67.4 million, to pay principal, interest, and prepayment penalties on its bank revolving credit loans. The Company will avoid approximately $72.0 million in cash interest payments over the next 4 years due to this repurchase and refinancing.
Through June 30, 2003, Crown Media Holdings had borrowed $75.0 million under the line of credit with HC Crown, which is the full amount available under that line of credit, to pay scheduled subscriber acquisition fee payments, marketing costs and programming fees accrued at the end of the previous year and to support the cash needs of its current operations. Because of the pay down on the bank credit facility on August 5, 2003, the Company has available funds under the bank credit facility of approximately $67.3 million. Prior to the pay down, the Company had borrowed the full amount available under the bank credit facility of $320.0 million. The Companys principal sources of funds are currently cash inflows from operations, cash on hand, periodic cash inflows expected under the tax sharing agreement with Hallmark Cards and amounts available for borrowing under its bank credit facility. In addition, as of August 5, 2003, $32.0 million had been received under the tax sharing agreement and the Company expects that the remaining payments under the tax sharing agreement in 2003 will be approximately $15.0 million. The Company also believes that since the tax sharing agreement is with the Companys largest shareholder, there is a potential that future tax sharing payments could become available to the Company at an earlier date.
The Company projects that advertising revenue and licensing fees will increase in 2003, and that certain operating expenses will continue to decrease as a result of the reorganization begun in the fourth quarter of 2002. Considering these projected revenues and reduced expenditures, the Company believes that cash flow from its operations, cash on hand, remaining availability under its credit facility and payments anticipated under the tax sharing agreement will be sufficient to meet its liquidity needs through at least June 2004. However, any decline in the popularity of the Hallmark Channel, any significant future modifications to the Companys distribution agreements, an economic decline in the advertising market, an unexpected increase in competition or other adverse operating conditions will impact the Companys ability to achieve its projected operating results. If the projected operating results are not achieved, the Company may need to obtain additional funding. In any event, in order to provide more liquidity, Crown Media Holdings may consider pursuing alternatives to raise additional cash, which could include the issuance of additional equity or debt securities. There can be no assurance, however, that additional funding will be available, if at all, on terms acceptable to the Company. Any new debt financing would require the agreement of existing lenders, including HC Crown.
28
Bank Credit Facility; HC Crown Line of Credit and Senior Unsecured Note
Our bank credit facility, the HC Crown line of credit and our 10.25% senior unsecured discount note sold to HC Crown are described in Item 7 of Managements Discussion and Analysis of Historical Financial Condition and Results of Operation in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, and earlier in this Report. As a result of these agreements, we are subject to a number of affirmative and negative covenants. The covenants in our bank credit facility were revised at the time of the sale of our senior unsecured note in August 2003. A summary of certain of those covenants as revised is stated below.
The bank credit facility contains a number of affirmative and negative covenants. Negative covenants include: Limitations on indebtedness, liens, investments, Restricted Payments, capital expenditures, changes in our business activities, and other matters; not amending the promissory note with HC Crown, the related letter of credit issued for our benefit, the $400.0 million senior unsecured note of August 2003 sold to HC Crown, or certain of our other material agreements; a requirement that EBITDA not be less than specified amounts for each quarter through December 31, 2003 and specified amounts for any consecutive rolling four-quarter period starting with the fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2004, maintaining net worth, as defined, of not less than specified base amounts plus income and 50% of equity investments after December 17, 2001, which includes a base amount of $250.0 million at December 31, 2003 decreasing to a base amount of $150.0 million as of the end of each quarter in 2004 and $100.0 million as of the end of each quarter in 2005; not permitting the Leverage Ratio (that is, the ratio of aggregate principal amount of indebtedness at the date of determination excluding any preferred stock and non-interest bearing obligations to EBITDA for the 12-month period ending on the date of determination) to exceed maximum leverage ratios from December 31, 2004 through June 30, 2006; and not permitting the Interest Coverage Ratio (the ratio of EBITDA to interest expense) at any time during the twelve-month periods ending at the end of each calendar quarter commencing December 31, 2004 to be less than specified ratios. Restricted Payments include any distribution on our equity, any redemption or other acquisition of our equity, any cash payment with respect to the $400.0 million senior unsecured note of August 2003 sold to HC Crown, any payment on debt of Crown Media Holdings which is subordinated to the bank loans, any reduction of the HC Crown line of credit for Crown Media Holdings, any payment on certain obligations assumed by Crown Media Holdings under the purchase agreement for the film assets and any other payment to Hallmark Cards, Hallmark Entertainment or any of their affiliates. The bank credit agreement permits Crown Media Holdings to use net cash proceeds from the issuance of debt or equity to be used for certain Restricted Payments. The bank credit agreement also permits, among other things, payments by Crown Media Holdings to Hallmark Entertainment Distribution under program license agreements and to Hallmark Entertainment, Hallmark Cards or their affiliates under the terms of service agreements up to certain dollar amounts.
The Note Purchase Agreement for the 10.25% senior unsecured discount notes issued to HC Crown contains certain covenants which restrict on the part of Crown Media Holdings and its subsidiaries, among other matters, the incurrence of any additional indebtedness, the repurchase or other acquisition of Crown Media Holdings stock, investments in other parties and the incurrence of liens.
Tax Sharing Agreement
For further information regarding the tax sharing agreement, please see Tax Sharing Agreement in Note 7 to the Condensed Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this Report.
Risk Factors
If we do not successfully address the risks described below, our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow could be materially adversely affected. The trading price of our Class A common stock could decline because of any of these risks.
Risks Relating to Our Business
Our business has incurred net losses since inception and may continue to incur losses.
Both our international and domestic channels have a history of net losses and we expect to continue to report net losses for the foreseeable future. As of June 30, 2003, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $889.4 million, goodwill of approximately $314.0 million, and film assets of $775.3 million.
29
We cannot assure you that we will achieve or sustain profitability. If we are not able to achieve or sustain profitability, the trading price of our Class A common stock may fall significantly. To diminish our losses and become profitable, we will need to substantially increase our revenue, particularly advertising and licensing revenue. This will require, among other things, increasing the distribution of our channels, attracting more viewers to our channels, attracting more advertisers, and increasing our advertising rates. Risks associated with these areas of our business are described below.
In addition, in order to accomplish these goals, the management of Crown Media Holdings continues to believe that it is necessary to increase subscribers and enhance our programming, which results in increased subscriber acquisition fees and higher costs for programming. Over the last three years, these actions have resulted in increased net losses for Crown Media Holdings.
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial health, and the restrictions imposed by the terms of our debt instruments may severely limit our ability to plan for or respond to changes in our business.
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness. As of August 5, 2003, our total debt was $763.0 million. This amount included our $400.0 million senior unsecured note, our $253.0 million credit facility, our $75.0 million line of credit with HC Crown, our $10.0 million of capital lease obligations and our $25.0 million of redeemable preferred minority interest. In addition, subject to the restrictions under our various debt agreements, we may incur additional indebtedness from time to time to cover our operating losses, to finance acquisitions or capital expenditures or for other purposes.
As a result of our level of debt and the terms of our debt instruments:
| our vulnerability to adverse general economic conditions is heightened; | ||
| we will be required to dedicate a portion of our cash flow from operations to repayment of debt, limiting the availability of cash for other purposes; | ||
| we are and will continue to be limited by financial and other restrictive covenants in our ability to borrow additional funds, consummate asset sales, enter into transactions with affiliates or conduct mergers and acquisitions; | ||
| our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry will be limited; | ||
| we are sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates; and | ||
| our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, general corporate purposes or other purposes may be impaired. |
Our ability to meet our debt and other obligations and to reduce our total debt depends on our future operating performances and on economic, financial, competitive and other factors. There can be no assurance that our leverage and such restrictions will not materially and adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs or to engage in other business activities.
Our interest expense may impact our future operations.
High levels of interest expense could have negative effects on our future operations. Interest expense, which is net of interest income and has included amortization of debt issuance costs and interest expense on borrowings under our demand notes, credit facility and private placement, increased $1.8 million to $7.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003, from $5.7 for the three months ended June 30, 2002, and increased $3.1 million to $14.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003, from $11.8 for the six months ended June 30, 2002. Our interest expense will increase as a result of the issuance of the $400.0 million senior secured note on August 5, 2003, and in accordance with the new accounting treatment of our preferred securities under SFAS No. 150 for the period July 1, 2003, through August 5, 2003. This note accretes at 10.25% per annum to August 5, 2007, and from that date interest at 10.25% per annum on the note will be payable semi-annually until maturity in 2011. A substantial portion of our cash flow from operations must be used to pay our interest expense and will not be available for other business purposes. In addition, we may need to incur additional indebtedness in the future. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow or that future financings will be available to provide sufficient proceeds to meet our obligations or to service our total debt.
30
Our liquidity is dependent on external funds.
We believe based on projected revenue and expenditures that our tax sharing agreement, any amounts available under our bank credit facility, together with cash generated from operations and cash on hand, will be sufficient for our liquidity needs through at least June 30, 2004. However, because we currently operate at a loss and have a negative cash flow, any unanticipated significant expense or any development that hampers our growth in revenue or decreases any of our revenue, may result in the need for additional external funds in order to continue operations. We have no arrangements for any external financings, whether debt or equity, and are not certain whether any such new external financing would be available on acceptable terms. Any new debt financing would require the cooperation and agreement of existing lenders and HC Crown.
Modification of any existing agreements with United States distributors could decrease our subscriber fees revenue but, if our distribution is increased, it could also result in higher advertising revenue.
Several of the Crown Media United States existing distribution agreements contain most favored nations clauses. These clauses typically provide that, in the event Crown Media United States enters into an agreement with another distributor on more favorable terms, these terms must be offered to the existing distributor, subject to certain exceptions and conditions. In August 2001, Crown Media United States entered into a new distribution agreement with DirecTV, Inc. under which the Hallmark Channel was repositioned to DirecTVs TOTAL CHOICE® Package and our subscribers increased significantly. Several other distributors, whose agreements contain most favored nations provisions, have indicated an interest in some or all of the DirecTV terms. Crown Media United States is currently in discussions with several other of these distributors and has already amended its agreement with one of the distributors to incorporate some of the DirecTV terms. For information concerning this amendment to an existing distribution agreement with a large domestic distributor, please see Revenue under Item 2 above. Any further modification of these existing agreements to adopt the DirecTV terms, or any other new terms, could result in the payment of cash or the issuance of stock by us and will negatively affect subscriber revenue.
If we are unable to obtain programming from third parties, we may be unable to increase our subscriber base.
We compete with other pay television channel providers to acquire programming. If we fail to continue to obtain programming on reasonable terms for any reason, including as a result of competition, we could be forced to incur additional costs to acquire such programming or look for alternative programming, which may hinder the growth of our subscriber base.
If our programming declines in popularity, our subscriber fees and advertising revenue could fall and the additional revenue we expect as a result of the acquisition of film assets from Hallmark Entertainment Distribution may be lower than we anticipate.
Our success depends partly upon unpredictable and volatile factors beyond our control, such as viewer preferences, competing programming and the availability of other entertainment activities. We may not be able to anticipate and react effectively to shifts in tastes and interests in our markets. Our ability to react effectively may also be limited by our obligation to license programming from Hallmark Entertainment Distribution, which has standards that limit the types of programming that it will provide to us. Our competitors may have more flexible programming arrangements, as well as greater amounts of production, better distribution, and greater capital resources, and may be able to react more quickly to shifts in tastes and interests. As a result, we may be unable to maintain the commercial success of any of our current programming, or to generate sufficient demand and market acceptance for our new programming. A shift in viewer preferences in programming or alternative entertainment activities could cause a decline in revenues from advertising, subscriber fees and licensing of our film assets. The decline in revenue could hinder or prevent us from achieving profitability and could adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.
We are currently dependent on Hallmark Entertainment to distribute and maximize licensing fees from the film assets.
Currently, we are dependent on Hallmark Entertainment to distribute and license our film assets to third parties for us under the terms of a three-year service agreement, which commenced January 1, 2001. This arrangement reduces our control over the sales and distribution of the film assets and might delay our realization of the full revenue stream from the film assets. We and Hallmark Entertainment each have the right to terminate the service agreement after the first year. If Hallmark Entertainment elects to terminate the agreement, we may not be able to establish our own or obtain alternative distribution services of equivalent quality or on terms as favorable to us. This could hinder our ability, at least in the short-term, to achieve the amount of additional revenue anticipated from these activities and could adversely affect the market price of our Class A common stock.
31
If we are unable to increase our advertising revenue, we may be unable to achieve profitability.
If we fail to increase our advertising revenue, we may be unable to achieve or sustain profitability, or expand our business. We expect that over time the portion of our revenue derived from the sale of advertising time on our channels will increase. We have a limited history of marketing and selling advertising time, particularly internationally. We may be unable to identify, attract and retain experienced sales and marketing personnel with relevant experience for our U.S. channel, and our sales and marketing organization may be unable to successfully compete against the significantly more extensive and well-funded sales and marketing operations of our current or potential competitors. Success in increasing our advertising revenue also depends upon the number and coverage of the distributors who carry our channels, our number of subscribers, and the viewership ratings for our programming. In addition, if we fail to improve our ratings, we will not be able to increase our advertising sales rate-card or may be required to run additional advertising spots which detract from our available advertising inventory for future sales.
The international cable advertising market is much less developed than in the United States, the United Kingdom and Central Europe. We believe that only certain international markets have the potential for growth in advertising revenues and intend to emphasize those markets. Most of our international advertising revenue is derived from operations in the United Kingdom, Poland and South Africa.
Hallmark Entertainment Investments controls us and this control could create conflicts of interest or inhibit potential changes of control.
Hallmark Entertainment Investments controls all of our outstanding shares of Class B common stock and owns shares of Class A common stock, representing approximately 96.1% of the outstanding voting power on all matters submitted to our stockholders. Hallmark Entertainment Holdings, a subsidiary of Hallmark Cards, controls the voting of all our shares held by Hallmark Entertainment Investments. Hallmark Entertainment Investments control could discourage others from initiating potential merger, takeover or other change of control transactions that may otherwise be beneficial to our business or holders of Class A common stock. As a result, the market price of our Class A common stock could suffer, and our business could suffer. Hallmark Entertainment Investments control relationship with us also could give rise to conflicts of interest, including:
| conflicts between Hallmark Entertainment Investments, as our controlling stockholder, and our other stockholders, whose interests may differ with respect to, among other things, our strategic direction or significant corporate transactions; | ||
| conflicts related to corporate opportunities that could be pursued by us, on the one hand, or by Hallmark Entertainment Investments or its other affiliates, on the other hand; or | ||
| conflicts related to existing or new contractual relationships between us, on the one hand, and Hallmark Entertainment Investments and its affiliates, on the other hand. |
In addition, persons serving as directors, officers or employees of both Hallmark Entertainment Investments and us may have conflicting duties to each. For example, Robert A. Halmi, Jr. is Chairman of our Board and is a Director and the Chairman of Hallmark Entertainment Investments and the President and Chief Executive Officer of Hallmark Entertainment, which could create potential conflicts of interest. As a result, it is possible that we may receive less favorable contractual terms from Hallmark Entertainment Investments and its affiliates than if none of our officers or directors had any affiliation with Hallmark Entertainment Investments.
We could lose the right to use the name Hallmark because we have limited-duration trademark license agreements, which could harm our business.
We license the name Hallmark from Hallmark Cards and Hallmark Licensing, Inc., for various uses, including in the name of our international and domestic channels. The license agreement for our international channel permits the use of the Hallmark trademarks outside the United States and Canada through November 30, 2003, so long as Hallmark Cards and its wholly owned subsidiaries collectively own at least 51% of our voting interest and at least 35% of our equity interest and designate a majority of our board of directors, and so long as there is no event of default under the agreement. The license agreement for our domestic channel permits the use of the Hallmark trademarks in the United States through November 30, 2003, under terms substantially similar to the terms applicable to the license of our international channel. If Hallmark Cards determines not to renew the trademark license agreements for any reason, including our failure to meet minimum programming thresholds dependent on programming provided by affiliates of Hallmark Cards or to comply with Hallmark Cards programming standards, we would be forced to significantly revise our business plan and operations, and could experience a significant erosion of our subscriber base and advertising revenue, particularly in the United States.
32
If our third-party suppliers fail to provide us with network infrastructure services on a timely basis, our costs could increase and our growth could be hindered.
We currently rely on third parties to supply key network infrastructure services, including uplink, playback, transmission and satellite services to certain of our markets, which are available only from limited sources. We have occasionally experienced delays and other problems in receiving communications equipment, services and facilities and may, in the future, be unable to obtain such services, equipment or facilities on the scale and within the time frames required by us on terms we find acceptable, or at all. If we are unable to obtain, or if we experience a delay in the delivery of, such services, we may be forced to incur significant unanticipated expenses to secure alternative third party suppliers or adjust our operations, which could hinder our growth and reduce our revenue and profitability.
If our Network Operations Center fails or its operations are disrupted, our revenue could decrease, our costs could increase and our growth could be hindered.
We commenced operations at the Network Operations Center in February 2001. We are currently using the Network Operations Center for the origination and playback of signals for the Hallmark Channel domestically and internationally in Europe and the Middle East and Asia. Like other single-point facilities, the Network Operations Center is subject to interruption from fire, tornadoes, lightning and other unexpected natural causes. Although we have redundant systems in place, equipment failure, employee misconduct or outside interference could also disrupt the Network Operations Centers services. We currently do not have and are not planning a duplicate operations facility. Any significant interruption at the Network Operations Center affecting the distribution of our channels could have an adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
If our local distribution partner for the Latin American region fails to perform, our operations could be disrupted and our business harmed.
In the first quarter of 2003, we moved the majority of our operations concerning the distribution of the Hallmark Channel in Mexico, Central and South America to a local distribution partner in Argentina, Pramer. One purpose of the action is to substantially reduce our expenses for operations in this region. If Pramer is unable to adequately perform the functions of selling our Channel to local operators, to gain sufficient advertising sales and to appropriately market the Channel, we may not improve our performance in the region. In addition, Pramer performs the local origination and playback services for our feeds to Latin America. All but one of these the feeds are sent by Pramer back to Denver for uplink and distribution to affiliates over our satellite capacity on the PAS-9 satellite. Any significant interruption of Pramers services, which affects the Latin American feeds of our Channel, could have an adverse effect on the results of our business in the region.
If we are unable to retain key executives and other personnel, our growth could be inhibited and our business harmed.
Our success depends on the expertise and continued service of our executive officers and key employees of our subsidiaries. If we fail to attract, hire or retain the necessary personnel, or if we lose the services of our key executives, we may be unable to implement our business plan or keep pace with developing trends in our industry.
We are subject to the risks of doing business outside the United States.
Historically, a significant portion of our revenue has been generated from foreign operations. In order to maintain or expand our presence in foreign markets, we have entered and may in the future enter into joint ventures or other strategic relationships with local operators in those markets. Certain foreign laws, regulations and judicial procedures may not be as protective of programmer rights as those applicable in the United States. In addition, many foreign countries have currency and exchange laws regulating the international transfer of currencies. To the extent that significant currency fluctuations result in materially higher costs to any of our foreign customers, those customers may be unable or unwilling to make the required payments. We may be subject to delays in access to courts and to the remedies local laws impose in order to collect our payments and recover our assets. We also may experience problems with collecting accounts due from foreign customers, which would adversely affect our revenue and income. Our growth and profitability may also suffer as a result of, among other matters, competitive pressures on video delivery, labor stoppages, recessions and other political or economic events adversely affecting world or regional trading markets or affecting a particular customer.
33
Our current and future operations in emerging markets may be harmed by the increased political and economic risks associated with these markets.
We currently broadcast in several foreign markets where market economies have only recently begun to develop, and we may expand these operations in the future. If the governments in these markets adopt more restrictive economic policies, we may not be able to continue operating, or to implement our expansion plans, in those markets. More generally, we are exposed to certain risks, many of which are beyond our control, inherent in operating in emerging market countries. These risks include changes in laws and policies affecting trade, investment and taxes (including laws and policies relating to the repatriation of funds and to withholding taxes), differing degrees of protection for intellectual property and the instability of emerging market economies, currencies, and governments.
The amount of our goodwill, as well as our film costs, may hinder our ability to achieve profitability.
As a result of our acquisitions of all the common interests in Crown Media United States and H&H Programming-Asia, we have generated a significant amount of goodwill. We have amortized the goodwill from these acquisitions on a straight-line basis over 20 years and 10 years, respectively. The amount of goodwill that we amortized was treated as a charge against earnings under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. In accordance with recent accounting pronouncements, we ceased as of January 1, 2002, the amortization of this acquired goodwill, and we are required to periodically review whether the value of our goodwill has been impaired. If we are required to write down our goodwill, our results of operations, stockholders equity or profitability could be materially adversely affected.
Commencing with the fourth quarter of 2001, we also have a film cost relating to the amortization of the purchase price for the film assets that we use and license to others. This film cost is, and will continue to be, a significant component of our cost of services each quarter.
Our stock price may be volatile and could decline substantially.
The stock market has, from time to time, experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. Many factors may cause the market price for our Class A common stock to decline, including:
| our operating results failing to meet the expectations of investors in any quarter; | ||
| material announcements by us or our competitors; | ||
| governmental regulatory action; | ||
| technological innovations by competitors or competing technologies; | ||
| investor perceptions of our industry or prospects, or those of our customers; and | ||
| changes in general market conditions or economic trends. |
In the past, companies that have experienced volatility in the market price of their securities have been the subjects of securities class action litigation. If we become involved in a securities class action litigation in the future, it could result in substantial costs and diversion of management attention and resources, harming our business.
Shares eligible for public sale in the future could adversely affect our stock price.
The market price of our Class A common stock could decline as a result of sales by our larger, existing stockholders in the future or the perception that these sales could occur. These sales also might make it difficult for us to sell equity securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate. In addition, some of our existing stockholders who hold restricted stock have the ability to require us to register their shares for public sale.
34
Risks Relating to Our Industry
Competition could reduce our channel revenue and our ability to achieve profitability.
We operate in the pay television business, which is highly competitive. If we are unable to compete effectively with large diversified entertainment companies that have substantially greater resources than we have, our operating margins and market share could be reduced, and the growth of our business inhibited. In particular, we compete for distribution with other pay television channels and, when distribution is obtained, for viewers and advertisers with pay television channels, broadcast television networks, radio, the Internet and other media. We also compete, to varying degrees, with other leisure-time activities such as movie theaters, the Internet, radio, print media, personal computers and other alternative sources of entertainment and information. Future technological developments may affect competition within this business.
A continuing trend towards business combinations and alliances in both the domestic and foreign communications industries may create significant new competitors for us or intensify existing competition. Many of these combined entities have more than one channel and resources far greater than ours. These combined entities may provide bundled packages of programming, delivery and other services that compete directly with the products we offer. These entities may also offer services sooner and at more competitive rates than we do. In addition, these alliances may benefit from both localized content and the local political climate.
We may need to reduce our prices or license additional programming to remain competitive, and we may be unable to sustain future pricing levels as competition increases. Our failure to achieve or sustain market acceptance of our programming at desired pricing levels could impair our ability to achieve profitability or positive cash flow, which would harm our business.
Distributors in the United States may attempt to increasingly pressure smaller pay TV channels in terms of viewership, such as our domestic Hallmark Channel, to accept decreasing amounts for subscriber fees, to pay higher subscriber acquisition fees or to allow carriage of the Channel without the payment of subscriber fees. Factors that may lead to this pressure include the number of competing pay TV channels, the limited space available on services of distributors in the United States and the desire of distributors to maintain or reduce costs. Any reduction in subscriber fees revenue now or in the future could have a material impact on our ability to achieve profitability and cash flow.
New distribution technologies may fundamentally change the way we distribute our channels and could significantly decrease our revenue or require us to incur significant capital expenditures.
Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and adapt to technological changes and to offer, on a timely basis, services that meet customer demands and evolving industry standards. The pay television industry has been, and is likely to continue to be, subject to:
| rapid and significant technological change, including continuing developments in technology which do not presently have widely accepted standards; and | ||
| frequent introductions of new services and alternative technologies, including new technologies for providing video services. |
For example, the advent of digital technology is likely to accelerate the convergence of broadcast, telecommunications, Internet and other media and could result in material changes in the economics, regulations, intellectual property usage and technical platforms on which our business relies, including lower retail rates for video services. These changes could fundamentally affect the scale, source, and volatility of our revenue streams, cost structures, and profitability, and may require us to significantly change our operations.
We also rely in part on third parties for the development of, and access to, communications and network technology. As a result, we may be unable to obtain access to new technology on a timely basis or on satisfactory terms, which could harm our business and prospects.
Moreover, the increased capacity of digital distribution platforms, including the introduction of digital terrestrial television, may reduce the competition for the right to carry channels and allow development of extra services at low incremental cost. These lower incremental costs could lower barriers to entry for competing channels, and place pressure on our operating margins and market position. In addition, a greater number of channels would likely increase competition among channels for viewers and advertisers, which could affect our ability to attract advertising and new distribution at desired pricing levels, and could therefore hinder or prevent the growth of our subscriber base.
35
If we fail to comply with applicable government regulations, our business could be harmed.
If, as a provider of television channels, we fail to comply with applicable present or future government regulations in any markets in which we operate, we could be prohibited from operating in those markets and could be subject to monetary fines, either of which would increase our operating costs, reduce our revenue and limit our ability to achieve profitability. The scope of regulation to which we are subject varies from country to country, although in many significant respects a similar approach is taken to the regulation of broadcasting across all of the markets in which we operate. Typically, broadcasting regulation in each of the countries in which we operate requires that domestic broadcasters and platform providers secure broadcasting licenses from the domestic broadcasting authority. Additionally, most nations have broadcasting legislation and regulations, which set minimum standards regarding program content, and prescribe minimum standards for the content and scheduling of television advertisements. Some countries require that a certain portion of programming carried by broadcasters be produced domestically.
Moreover, broadcasting regulations are generally subject to periodic and on-going governmental review and legislative initiatives, which may, in the future, affect the nature of programming we are able to offer and the means by which it is distributed. The timing, scope or outcome of these reviews could be unfavorable to us, and any changes to current broadcasting legislation or regulations could require adjustments to our operations.
Available Reports
We will make available, free of charge, through our website, www.hallmarkchannel.com, this Quarterly Report, our annual reports on Form 10-K, our current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to such reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file or furnish such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We only invest in instruments that meet high credit and quality standards, as specified in our investment policy guidelines. These instruments, like all fixed income instruments, are subject to interest rate risk. The fixed income portfolio will fall in value if there is an increase in interest rates. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 10% from levels as of June 30, 2003, the decline of the fair value of the fixed income portfolio would not be material.
As of June 30, 2003, our cash, restricted cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments had a fair value of $8.6 million, which was invested in cash and short-term commercial paper. The primary purpose of these investing activities has been to preserve principal until the cash is required to fund operations. Consequently, the size of this portfolio fluctuates significantly as cash is raised and used in our business.
The value of certain investments in this portfolio can be impacted by the risk of adverse changes in securities and economic markets and interest rate fluctuations. At June 30, 2003, all of our investments in this category were in fixed rate instruments or money market type accounts. A decrease in interest rates has the effect of reducing our future annual interest income from this portfolio, since funds would be reinvested at lower rates as the instruments mature. Over time, any net percentage decrease in our interest rates could be reflected in a corresponding net percentage decrease in our interest income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, the impact of interest rate fluctuations, changed business prospects and all other factors did not have a material impact on the fair value of this portfolio, or on our income derived from this portfolio.
We have not used derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2003, we are not hedged or otherwise protected against risks associated with any of our investing or financing activities.
As of June 30, 2003, we estimated the fair value of borrowings under our bank credit facility, excluding accrued interest, to be approximately $320.0 million and the fair value of borrowings under our line of credit with HC Crown, excluding interest, to be approximately $75.0 million. Because the interest rates on these facilities are variable and are reset periodically, the fair value of our debt is not significantly affected by fluctuations in interest rates. A hypothetical 10% increase or decrease in assumed interest rates would decrease or increase the fair value of our debt by approximately $1.6 million, assuming that the balance of and the interest rates on our debt were fixed as of June 30, 2003. To the extent interest rates increase, our costs of financing will also increase because of variable rates applicable to our outstanding debt. A hypothetical increase in assumed interest rates of 10% would have resulted in additional interest expense of $408,000 and $817,000 during the three and six months ended June 30, 2003.
Our senior unsecured note of August 2003 in the original amount of $400.0 million accretes until August 5, 2007, at the fixed rate of 10.25% per annum and accrues interest thereafter at the fixed rate of 10.25% per annum.
36
We are exposed to market risk.
We are exposed to market risk, including changes to interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity investment prices. To reduce the volatility relating to these exposures, we may enter into various derivative investment transactions in the near term pursuant to our investment and risk management policies and procedures in areas such as hedging and counterparty exposure practices. We did not and will not use derivatives for speculative purposes.
Though we intend to use risk management control policies, there will be inherent risks that may only be partially offset by our hedging programs should there be any unfavorable movements in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates or equity investment prices.
The estimated exposure discussed below is intended to measure the maximum amount we could lose from adverse market movements in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and equity investment prices, given a specified confidence level, over a given period of time. Loss is defined in the value at risk estimation as fair market value loss.
Our interest income and expense is subject to fluctuations in interest rates.
Our material interest bearing assets consisted of cash equivalents, restricted cash, and short-term investments. The balance of our interest bearing assets was $8.3 million, or less than 1% of total assets, as of June 30, 2003. Our material liabilities subject to interest rate risk consisted of a capital lease obligation, our bank credit facility, and our line of credit with HC Crown. The balance of those liabilities was $457.5 million, or 55% of total liabilities, as of June 30, 2003. Net interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003, was $7.5 million and $14.9 million, or 17%, of our total revenue, respectively. Our net interest expense of these liabilities is sensitive to changes in the general level of interest rates, primarily U.S. interest rates. In this regard, changes in U.S. interest rates affect the interest bearing assets.
We are exposed to risks relating to foreign currency exchange rates and foreign economic conditions.
We evaluate our foreign currency exposure on a net basis. We receive subscriber fees and advertising revenue from countries throughout the world. Increasingly, however, these are being offset by expenses arising from our foreign facilities as well as non-U.S. dollar expenses. Generally, payments required under our agreements are denominated in U.S. dollars and, therefore, unaffected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. We have some exposure to changes in exchange rates in Latin America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. However, our exposure to foreign exchange rates primarily exists with the British pound. When the U.S. dollar strengthens against the currencies in these countries, the U.S. dollar value of non-U.S. dollar-based revenue decreases; when the U.S. dollar weakens, the U.S. dollar value of non-U.S. dollar-based revenue increases. Accordingly, changes in exchange rates, and in particular, a strengthening of the U.S. dollar, may adversely affect our revenue as expressed in U.S. dollars.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
The Companys management with the participation of the Companys principal executive and financial officers, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2003. Based upon this evaluation, the Companys principal executive and financial officers concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of that date for purposes of recording, processing, summarizing and timely reporting material information required to be disclosed in reports that the Company files under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
Changes in internal controls.
There were not any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2003, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
37
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
On August 5, 2003, Crown Media Holdings sold its $400.0 million 10.25% senior unsecured discount note to HC Crown. For information regarding this note and changes made at the time of the sale of this note to our bank credit facility, please see Part I, Item 2, Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under the headings Effects of Transactions With Related and Certain Other Parties Senior Unsecured Notes and Bank Credit Facility; HC Crown Line of Credit and Senior Unsecured Notes, which descriptions are incorporated herein by reference.
The senior unsecured note was sold pursuant to an exemption from a registration available for non-public offerings. HC Crown is a subsidiary of Hallmark Cards, which owns a substantial interest in Crown Media Holdings.
In May 2003, we issued restricted stock units as described in Note 2 to the Condensed Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Report under the heading Employee Incentives and Retention. The restricted stock units were exchanged for stock options and were issued pursuant to an exemption available under Section 3(a)(9) for an exchange with existing security holders.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Our 2002 annual meeting of stockholders was held on June 12, 2003. The following proposal was voted upon at the meeting, with the following number of votes cast for, against or withheld:
Proposal One Elect 14 directors to our Board of Directors.
Abstentions | ||||||||||||
Votes | and Broker | |||||||||||
Name | Votes For | Withheld | Non-Votes | |||||||||
Robert A. Halmi, Jr. |
379,021,565 | 1,135,784 | -0- | |||||||||
David J. Evans |
379,021,601 | 1,135,748 | -0- | |||||||||
Wilford V. Bane, Jr. |
379,742,314 | 415,035 | -0- | |||||||||
Arnold L. Chavkin |
379,322,129 | 835,220 | -0- | |||||||||
Robert J. Druten |
378,868,174 | 1,289,175 | -0- | |||||||||
Donald J. Hall, Jr. |
379,021,681 | 1,135,668 | -0- | |||||||||
Irvine O. Hockaday, Jr. |
379,489,218 | 668,131 | -0- | |||||||||
David B. Koff |
379,488,620 | 668,729 | -0- | |||||||||
Peter A. Lund |
379,784,714 | 372,635 | -0- | |||||||||
John P. Mascotte |
379,635,682 | 521,667 | -0- | |||||||||
Judith C. Whittaker |
379,080,992 | 1,076,357 | -0- | |||||||||
David E. Hall |
379,021,681 | 1,135,668 | -0- | |||||||||
Deanne R. Stedem |
379,035,263 | 1,122,086 | -0- | |||||||||
Anil Jagtiani |
379,637,216 | 520,133 | -0- |
All 14 persons listed above were existing directors and were re-elected as our directors at that meeting.
38
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) |
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||||||
Number | Description | |||||
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Amendment No. 2), Commission File No. 333-95573, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||||
3.2 | Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as filed with the State of Delaware on June 7, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||||
3.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Amendment No. 3), Commission File No. 333-95573, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||||
10.1 | Note Purchase Agreement, dated August 5, 2003 between Crown Media Holdings, Inc. and HC Crown Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein). | |||||
10.2 | 10.25% senior unsecured discount note dated August 5, 2003 issued by Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein). | |||||
10.3 | Amendment No. 6, dated August 5, 2003 to the Credit, Security, Guaranty and Pledge Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2001, as amended, among Crown Media Holdings, Inc., Guarantors, Lenders and JP Morgan Chase Bank as Administrative Agent and Issuing Bank for the Lenders (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein). | |||||
10.4 | Amendment No. 1 dated as of August 5, 2003 to the Federal Income Tax Sharing Agreement between Hallmark Cards Incorporated and Crown Media Holdings, Inc. | |||||
31 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications. | |||||
32 | Section 1350 Certifications. |
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K |
During the quarter ended June 30, 2003, we filed the following Form 8-K report:
| Report filed on May 6, 2003, regarding Item 12. |
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
CROWN MEDIA HOLDINGS, INC. | ||||||
Signature | Title | Date | ||||
By: |
/s/ DAVID J. EVANS
David J. Evans |
Director and Principal Executive Officer |
August 14, 2003 | |||
By: |
/s/ WILLIAM J. ALIBER
William J. Aliber |
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
August 14, 2003 |
40
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Amendment No. 2), Commission File No. 333-95573, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
3.2 | Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as filed with the State of Delaware on June 7, 2001 (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2001, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
3.3 | Amended and Restated Bylaws (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Amendment No. 3), Commission File No. 333-95573, and incorporated herein by reference). | |||
10.1 | Note Purchase Agreement, dated August 5, 2003 between Crown Media Holdings, Inc. and HC Crown Corp. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein). | |||
10.2 | 10.25% senior unsecured discount note dated August 5, 2003 issued by Crown Media Holdings, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 10.2 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein). | |||
10.3 | Amendment No. 6, dated August 5, 2003 to the Credit, Security, Guaranty and Pledge Agreement, dated as of August 31, 2001, as amended, among Crown Media Holdings, Inc., Guarantors, Lenders and JP Morgan Chase Bank as Administrative Agent and Issuing Bank for the Lenders (previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 6, 2003 and incorporated by reference herein). | |||
10.4 | Amendment No. 1 dated as of August 5, 2003 to the Federal Income Tax Sharing Agreement between Hallmark Cards Incorporated and Crown Media Holdings, Inc. | |||
31 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications. | |||
32 | Section 1350 Certifications. |