UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-Q
For Annual and Transition Reports Pursuant to Sections 13 or 15(d)
(Mark One)
|
||
[X]
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2003 | ||
or | ||
[ ]
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
Commission File Number 1-08262 |
Dean Holding Company
Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
75-2932967 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
2515 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1200
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [ ] No [X]
The registrant meets the conditions specified in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and, therefore, is filing this form with the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H(2) to Form 10-Q.
Table of Contents
Page | |||||
Part I Financial
Information
|
|||||
Item 1 Financial Statements
|
3 | ||||
Item 2 Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
15 | ||||
Item 4 Controls and Procedures
|
18 | ||||
Part II Other
Information
|
|||||
Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on
Form 8-K
|
19 |
-2-
Part I Financial Information
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
DEAN HOLDING COMPANY
June 30, | December 31, | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||||
Assets
|
|||||||||||
Current assets:
|
|||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 15,146 | $ | 27,831 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net
|
238,954 | 247,432 | |||||||||
Inventories
|
213,296 | 218,124 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
86,093 | 93,018 | |||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
19,404 | 20,651 | |||||||||
Total current assets
|
572,893 | 607,056 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
623,474 | 615,573 | |||||||||
Goodwill
|
1,425,864 | 1,425,398 | |||||||||
Identifiable intangible and other assets
|
225,239 | 227,796 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,847,470 | $ | 2,875,823 | |||||||
Liabilities and Stockholders
Equity
|
|||||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
|||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
$ | 367,205 | $ | 406,798 | |||||||
Income taxes payable
|
35,673 | 58,987 | |||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt
|
307 | 307 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities
|
403,185 | 466,092 | |||||||||
Long-term debt
|
773,363 | 727,873 | |||||||||
Other long-term liabilities
|
133,076 | 147,503 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
181,570 | 166,302 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
|
|||||||||||
Stockholders equity:
|
|||||||||||
Common stock, 1,000 shares issued and
outstanding
|
|||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital
|
1,356,816 | 1,356,816 | |||||||||
Retained earnings
|
230,213 | 149,643 | |||||||||
Receivable from parent
|
(230,346 | ) | (138,331 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
(407 | ) | (75 | ) | |||||||
Total stockholders equity
|
1,356,276 | 1,368,053 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,847,470 | $ | 2,875,823 | |||||||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-3-
DEAN HOLDING COMPANY
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 949,438 | $ | 994,367 | $ | 1,868,501 | $ | 1,950,852 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales
|
704,661 | 745,951 | 1,388,759 | 1,475,396 | ||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
244,777 | 248,416 | 479,742 | 475,456 | ||||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Selling and distribution
|
129,722 | 132,082 | 257,992 | 266,091 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
29,357 | 38,240 | 62,427 | 69,147 | ||||||||||||||
Amortization expense
|
608 | 1,351 | 1,783 | 3,018 | ||||||||||||||
Plant closing and restructuring costs
|
525 | 525 | ||||||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses
|
160,212 | 171,673 | 322,727 | 338,256 | ||||||||||||||
Operating income
|
84,565 | 76,743 | 157,015 | 137,200 | ||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, net
|
13,736 | 14,237 | 27,306 | 28,317 | ||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense, net
|
(414 | ) | 77 | (697 | ) | (808 | ) | |||||||||||
Total other (income) expense
|
13,322 | 14,314 | 26,609 | 27,509 | ||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
71,243 | 62,429 | 130,406 | 109,691 | ||||||||||||||
Income taxes
|
27,135 | 23,796 | 49,836 | 42,201 | ||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 44,108 | $ | 38,633 | $ | 80,570 | $ | 67,490 | ||||||||||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-4-
DEAN HOLDING COMPANY
Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||
June 30 | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net Income
|
$ | 80,570 | $ | 67,490 | ||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
36,228 | 36,682 | ||||||||||
Loss on disposition of assets
|
199 | 10 | ||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
22,193 | (1,485 | ) | |||||||||
Other, net
|
(429 | ) | (786 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net
of acquisitions:
|
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
8,074 | 16,023 | ||||||||||
Inventories
|
4,883 | 15,718 | ||||||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
2,078 | 14,444 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses and other
liabilities
|
(52,157 | ) | (56,684 | ) | ||||||||
Income taxes
|
(23,314 | ) | 38,766 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
78,325 | 130,178 | ||||||||||
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Net additions to property, plant and equipment
|
(43,188 | ) | (18,903 | ) | ||||||||
Cash outflows for acquisitions
|
(637 | ) | (17,156 | ) | ||||||||
Net proceeds from divestitures
|
2,561 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
|
1,889 | 198 | ||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(41,936 | ) | (33,300 | ) | ||||||||
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of debt
|
43,672 | |||||||||||
Repayment of debt
|
(12,770 | ) | ||||||||||
Net transfer to parent
|
(92,746 | ) | (78,722 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(49,074 | ) | (91,492 | ) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(12,685 | ) | 5,386 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
27,831 | 15,920 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 15,146 | $ | 21,306 | ||||||||
See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-5-
DEAN HOLDING COMPANY
June 30, 2003
1. | General |
Basis of Presentation The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report have been prepared on the same basis as the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. In our opinion, we have made all necessary adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) in order to present fairly, in all material respects, our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates and for the periods presented. Certain reclassifications have been made to conform our 2002 Consolidated Financial Statements to current classifications. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been omitted. The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this report should be read in conjunction with our 2002 Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2003.
This Quarterly Report, including these notes, has been written in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commissions Plain English guidelines. Unless otherwise indicated, references in this report to we, us or our refer to Dean Holding Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dean Foods Company. Dean Foods Company provides us with management support in return for a management fee. The management fee is based on budgeted annual expenses for Dean Foods Companys corporate headquarters, which is then allocated among the segments of Dean Foods Company. Dean Foods Company began charging us management fees in the second quarter of 2002. Dean Foods Company charged us management fees of $9.2 million and $9.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. Our cash is available for use by, and is regularly transferred to, Dean Foods Company at its discretion. Cash that has been transferred to Dean Foods Company is included on our balance sheet as Receivable from parent.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In June 2001, Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. This statement requires that the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation be recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. SFAS No. 143 became effective for us January 1, 2003. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
SFAS No. 145, Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 and Technical Corrections, was issued in April 2002 and is applicable to fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. One of the provisions of this technical statement is the rescission of SFAS No. 4, Reporting Gains and Losses from Extinguishment of Debt, whereby any gain or loss on the early extinguishment of debt that was classified as an extraordinary item in prior periods in accordance with SFAS No. 4, which does not meet the criteria of an extraordinary item as defined by APB Opinion 30, must be reclassified. Adoption of this standard requires us to reclassify extraordinary losses previously reported from the early extinguishment of debt as a component of other expense.
In June 2002, FASB issued SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities. This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in Restructuring). The statement requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred and is effective for exit or
-6-
In November 2002, FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN No. 45 clarifies the requirements of SFAS No. 5 Accounting for Contingencies, relating to the guarantors accounting for and disclosures of certain guarantees issued. FIN No. 45 requires disclosure of guarantees. It also requires liability recognition for the fair value of guarantees made after December 31, 2002. We adopted the liability recognition requirements of FIN No. 45 effective January 1, 2003. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In January 2003, FASB issued FIN No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. FIN No. 46 clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or in which equity investors do not bear the residual economic risks. The interpretation applies to variable interest entities (VIEs) created after January 31, 2003 and to VIEs in which an enterprise obtains an interest after that date. It applies in the fiscal or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, to VIEs in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that was acquired before February 1, 2003. We currently utilize a special purpose limited liability entity to facilitate our receivable-backed loan. Since its formation, this entity has been consolidated in our financial statements for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, FIN No. 46 will have no impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In April of 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This statement requires that contracts with comparable characteristics be accounted for similarly and is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003. We have no derivatives, therefore SFAS No. 149 will have no impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In May of 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity. This statement requires that certain financial instruments which had previously been classified as equity be classified with liabilities. We have no outstanding securities that meet the criteria of SFAS No. 150. Therefore, SFAS No. 150 will have no impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. | Inventories |
At June 30, | At December 31, | ||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||
Raw materials and supplies
|
$ | 71,147 | $ | 68,570 | |||||
Finished goods
|
142,149 | 149,554 | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 213,296 | $ | 218,124 | |||||
Approximately $63.5 million and $97.3 million of our inventory was accounted for under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of accounting at June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. There was no material excess of current cost over the stated value of LIFO inventories at either date.
-7-
3. | Intangible Assets |
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 30, 2003 are as follows:
Specialty | ||||||||||||
Dairy Group | Foods | Total | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
$ | 1,121,108 | $ | 304,290 | $ | 1,425,398 | ||||||
Acquisitions
|
523 | 523 | ||||||||||
Purchasing accounting adjustments
|
(57 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2003
|
$ | 1,121,574 | $ | 304,290 | $ | 1,425,864 | ||||||
The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of our intangible assets other than goodwill as of June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002 are as follows:
At June 30, 2003 | At December 31, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amount | Amortization | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intangible assets with indefinite lives:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks
|
$ | 187,710 | $ | 0 | $ | 187,710 | $ | 188,010 | $ | 0 | $ | 188,010 | |||||||||||||
Intangible assets with finite lives:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer-related
|
31,173 | (7,645 | ) | 23,528 | 31,173 | (5,532 | ) | 25,641 | |||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 218,883 | $ | (7,645 | ) | $ | 211,238 | $ | 219,183 | $ | (5,532 | ) | $ | 213,651 | |||||||||||
Amortization expense on intangible assets for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $0.8 million and $0.5 million, and $2.1 million and $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Estimated aggregate intangible asset amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:
2004
|
$ | 3.2 million | ||
2005
|
3.2 million | |||
2006
|
3.2 million | |||
2007
|
3.0 million | |||
2008
|
3.0 million |
-8-
4. | Long-Term Debt |
At June 30, 2003 | At December 31, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||
Amount | Interest | Amount | Interest | |||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Rate | Outstanding | Rate | |||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||
$250 million senior notes maturing in 2007
|
$ | 250,448 | 8.150 | % | $ | 250,493 | 8.150 | % | ||||||||||
$200 million senior notes maturing in 2009
|
185,170 | 6.625 | 184,306 | 6.625 | ||||||||||||||
$150 million senior notes maturing in 2017
|
125,757 | 6.900 | 125,346 | 6.900 | ||||||||||||||
$100 million senior notes maturing in 2005
|
97,394 | 6.750 | 96,806 | 6.750 | ||||||||||||||
Receivables-backed loan
|
97,172 | 1.810 | 53,197 | 2.280 | ||||||||||||||
Industrial development revenue bonds
|
17,700 | 1.10 1.25 | 18,000 | 1.65 1.90 | ||||||||||||||
Capitalized lease obligations and other
|
29 | 32 | ||||||||||||||||
773,670 | 728,180 | |||||||||||||||||
Less current portion
|
(307 | ) | (307 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 773,363 | $ | 727,873 | ||||||||||||||
Senior Notes We had $700 million (face value) of senior notes outstanding at June 30, 2003. The related indentures do not contain financial covenants but they do contain certain restrictions including a prohibition against us and our subsidiaries granting liens on our material real estate interests and a prohibition against granting liens on the stock of our subsidiaries. The indentures also place certain restrictions on our ability to divest assets not in the ordinary course of business. At the date of our acquisition by Dean Foods Company, our long-term debt was re-valued to its current market value. The adjustment to fair value is reflected as a discount on senior notes in our consolidated financial statements.
Receivables-Backed Loan Dean Foods Company has entered into a $400 million receivables securitization facility pursuant to which certain of our subsidiaries sell their accounts receivable to a wholly-owned special purpose entity intended to be bankruptcy-remote. The special purpose entity then transfers the receivables to a third-party asset-backed commercial paper conduit sponsored by major financial institutions. The assets and liabilities of this entity are fully reflected on our balance sheet, and the securitization is treated as a borrowing for accounting purposes. The receivables-backed loan bears interest at a variable rate based on the commercial paper yield, as defined in the agreement.
Industrial Development Revenue Bonds We have certain industrial development revenue bonds outstanding, some of which require nominal annual sinking fund redemptions. Typically, these bonds are secured by irrevocable letters of credit issued by financial institutions, along with first mortgages on the related real property and equipment. Interest on these bonds is due semiannually at interest rates that vary based on market conditions.
Other Obligations Other obligations include various promissory notes for the purchase of property, plant and equipment and capital lease obligations. The various promissory notes payable provide for interest at varying rates and are payable in monthly installments of principal and interest until maturity, when the remaining principal balances are due. Capital lease obligations represent machinery and equipment financing obligations which are payable in monthly installments of principal and interest and are collateralized by the related assets financed.
Letters of Credit At June 30, 2003, $42.4 million of letters of credit were outstanding. The majority of letters of credit were required by various utilities and government entities for performance and insurance guarantees.
5. | Comprehensive Income |
Comprehensive income consists of net income plus all other changes in equity from non-owner sources. Consolidated comprehensive income was $43.9 million and $80.2 million for the three-months and
-9-
Pre-Tax | Tax | |||||||||||
Income | Benefit | Net | ||||||||||
(Loss) | (Expense) | Amount | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income,
December 31, 2002
|
$ | (115 | ) | $ | 40 | $ | (75 | ) | ||||
Cumulative translation adjustment arising during
period
|
(241 | ) | 85 | (156 | ) | |||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income,
March 31, 2003
|
(356 | ) | 125 | (231 | ) | |||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment arising during
period
|
(147 | ) | (29 | ) | (176 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income,
June 30, 2003
|
$ | (503 | ) | $ | 96 | $ | (407 | ) | ||||
6. | Plant Closing Costs |
Plant Closing Costs As part of an overall integration and cost reduction program, during the second quarter of 2003, we recorded charges of $0.5 million related to the organizational realignment of the Midwest region of our Dairy Group. Charges for the second quarter of 2003 restructuring were accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 146 Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, which became effective for us in January 2003. Under SFAS 146, the timing of certain costs associated with restructurings are accrued differently than in the past. We expect to incur additional charges related to the Midwest region organizational realignment of approximately $0.6 million primarily for workforce reduction costs. Cash outlays for these additional charges are expected to be completed by June of 2004.
The principal component of our overall integration and cost reduction program was workforce reductions as a result of a consolidation of administrative functions. The program includes an overall reduction of 37 employees who were primarily regional and plant employees. All except 19 employees had been terminated as of June 30, 2003;
Activity with respect to plant closing costs during the first half of 2003 is summarized below:
At | |||||||||||||
June 30, | |||||||||||||
Charges | Payments | 2003 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Cash charges:
|
|||||||||||||
Workforce reduction costs
|
$ | 525 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 515 |
There have not been significant adjustments to the plan.
As part of our acquisition by Dean Foods Company, we accrued costs in 2002 pursuant to plans to exit certain activities and operations of businesses in order to rationalize production and reduce costs and inefficiencies. In connection with our acquisition by Dean Foods Company, plants in Atkins, Arkansas and Cairo, Georgia in the Specialty Foods segment and a plant in Escondido, California in the Dairy Group were closed. We have also eliminated our administrative offices, closed Dairy Group distribution depots in Parker Ford, Pennsylvania and Camp Hill, Pennsylvania, shut down two pickle tank yards and relocated production between plants as part of our overall integration and efficiency efforts.
The principal components of the plans include the following:
| Workforce reductions as a result of plant closings, plant rationalizations and consolidation of administrative functions and offices, resulting in an overall reduction of 721 plant and administrative personnel. The costs incurred were charged against our acquisition liabilities for these costs. As of June 30, 2003, 10 employees had not yet been terminated; | |
| Shutdown costs, including those costs that are necessary to clean and prepare the plant facilities for closure; and |
-10-
| Costs incurred after shutdown such as lease obligations or termination costs, utilities and property taxes after shutdown of the plant or administrative office. |
Activity with respect to these liabilities for the first half of 2003 is summarized below:
At | At | |||||||||||||||
December 31, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2002 | Adjustments | Payments | 2003 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Workforce reduction costs
|
$ | 7,726 | $ | (4,752 | ) | $ | 2,974 | |||||||||
Shutdown costs
|
8,208 | $ | 891 | (1,942 | ) | 7,157 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 15,934 | $ | 891 | $ | (6,694 | ) | $ | 10,131 | |||||||
These liabilities were established on December 31, 2001 in connection with our acquisition by Dean Foods Company. No other significant charges were accrued for transaction-related closings.
7. | Shipping and Handling Fees |
Our shipping and handling costs are included in both cost of sales and selling and distribution expense depending on the nature of such costs. Shipping and handling costs included in cost of sales reflect the cost of shipping products to customers through third party carriers, inventory warehouse costs and product loading and handling costs. Shipping and handling costs included in selling and distribution expense consist primarily of route delivery costs for both company-owned delivery routes and independent distributor routes, to the extent that such independent distributors are paid a delivery fee. Shipping and handling costs that were recorded as a component of selling and distribution expense were approximately $94.4 million and $189.3 million during the second quarter and first half of 2003 and $93.1 million and $188.8 million in the second quarter and first half of 2002, respectively.
8. | Commitments and Contingencies |
Leases We lease certain property, plant and equipment used in our operations under operating lease agreements. Such leases, which are primarily for machinery, equipment and vehicles, have lease terms ranging from 1 to 20 years. Certain of the operating lease agreements require the payment of additional rentals for maintenance, along with additional rentals based on miles driven or units produced.
Guaranty of Dean Foods Companys Obligations Under Its Senior Credit Facility Certain of Dean Foods Companys subsidiaries, including us, are required to guarantee Dean Foods Companys indebtedness under its $2.7 billion senior credit facility. We have pledged substantially all of our assets (other than our real property and our ownership interests in our subsidiaries) as security for our guaranty. The senior credit facility provides Dean Foods Company with an $800 million revolving line of credit, a Tranche A $900 million term loan and a Tranche B $1 billion term loan. At June 30, 2003 there were outstanding term loan borrowings of $1.76 billion under this facility, plus $23.7 million that was outstanding under the revolving line of credit. Letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $109.3 million were issued but undrawn. At June 30, 2003 approximately $667.0 million was available for future borrowings under Dean Foods Companys revolving credit facility. Dean Foods Company is currently in compliance with all of the requirements contained in its credit facility.
Amounts outstanding under Dean Foods Companys revolving line of credit and Dean Foods Companys Tranche A term loan bear interest at a rate per annum equal to one of the following rates, at Dean Foods Companys option:
| a base rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis points or the prime rate, plus a margin that varies from 25 to 150 basis points, depending on Dean Foods Companys leverage ratio (which is computed as the ratio of indebtedness to EBITDA, as such terms are defined in the credit agreement) or |
-11-
| The London Interbank Offering Rate (LIBOR) divided by the product of one minus the Eurodollar Reserve Percentage, plus a margin that varies from 150 to 275 basis points, depending on Dean Foods Companys leverage ratio (as defined in the credit agreement). |
Borrowings under the Tranche B term loan bear interest at a rate per annum equal to one of the following rates, at Dean Foods Companys option:
| a base rate equal to the higher of the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis points or the prime rate, plus a margin that varies from 75 to 150 basis points, depending on Dean Foods Companys leverage ratio, or | |
| LIBOR divided by the product of one minus the Eurodollar Reserve Percentage, plus a margin that varies from 200 to 275 basis points, depending on Dean Foods Companys leverage ratio. |
The blended interest rate in effect on borrowings under the senior credit facility, including the applicable interest rate margin, was 3.35% at June 30, 2003. However, Dean Foods Company had interest rate swap agreements in place that hedged $1.43 billion of their borrowings under this facility at an average rate of 4.27%, plus the applicable interest rate margin. Interest is payable quarterly or at the end of the applicable interest period.
The agreement requires principal payments on the Tranche A term loan as follows:
| $16.87 million quarterly from March 31, 2002 through December 31, 2002; | |
| $33.75 million quarterly from March 31, 2003 through December 31, 2004; | |
| $39.38 million quarterly from March 31, 2005 through December 31, 2005; | |
| $45.0 million quarterly from March 31, 2006 through December 31, 2006; | |
| $56.25 million quarterly from March 31, 2007 through June 30, 2007; and | |
| A final payment of $112.5 million on July 15, 2007. |
The agreement requires principal payments on the Tranche B term loan as follows:
| $1.25 million quarterly from March 31, 2002 through December 31, 2002; | |
| $2.5 million quarterly from March 31, 2003 through December 31, 2007; | |
| A payment of $472.5 million on March 31, 2008; and | |
| A final payment of $472.5 million on July 15, 2008. |
No principal payments are due on the $800 million line of credit until maturity on July 15, 2007.
The credit agreement also requires mandatory principal prepayments in certain circumstances including without limitation: (1) upon the occurrence of certain asset dispositions not in the ordinary course of business and (2) upon the occurrence of certain debt and equity issuances when Dean Foods Companys leverage ratio is greater than 3.75 to 1.0. The credit agreement requires that Dean Foods Company prepay 50% of defined excess cash flow for any fiscal year (beginning in 2003) in which their leverage ratio at year end is greater than 3.75 to 1.0. As of June 30, 2003, Dean Foods Companys leverage ratio was 3.3 to 1.0.
The senior credit facility contains various financial and other restrictive covenants and requires that Dean Foods Company maintain certain financial ratios, including a leverage ratio (computed as the ratio of the aggregate outstanding principal amount of defined indebtedness to defined EBITDA) and an interest coverage ratio (computed as the ratio of defined EBITDA to interest expense). In addition, this facility requires that Dean Foods Company maintain a minimum level of net worth (as defined by the agreement).
-12-
Dean Foods Companys leverage ratio must be less than or equal to:
Period | Ratio | |||
01-01-03 through 12-31-03
|
4.00 to 1.00 | |||
01-01-04 through 12-31-04
|
3.75 to 1.00 | |||
01-01-05 and thereafter | 3.25 to 1.00 |
Dean Foods Companys interest coverage ratio must be greater than or equal to 3.00 to 1.00.
Dean Foods Companys consolidated net worth must be greater than or equal to $1.2 billion, as increased each quarter (beginning with the quarter ended March 31, 2002) by an amount equal to 50% of their consolidated net income for the quarter, plus 75% of the amount by which stockholders equity is increased by certain equity issuances. As of June 30, 2003, the minimum net worth requirement was $1.4 billion.
The facility also contains limitations on liens, investments and the incurrence of additional indebtedness, and prohibits certain dispositions of property and restricts certain payments, including dividends. The credit facility is secured by liens on substantially all of Dean Foods Companys domestic assets (including ours and those of our subsidiaries, but excluding the capital stock of our subsidiaries and the real property owned by us and our subsidiaries).
The agreement contains standard default triggers including without limitation: failure to maintain compliance with the financial and other covenants contained in the agreement, default on certain of Dean Foods Companys other debt, a change in control and certain other material adverse changes in their business. The agreement does not contain any default triggers based on Dean Foods Companys debt rating.
Litigation, Investigations and Audits We and our subsidiaries are parties, in the ordinary course of business, to certain other claims, litigation, audits and investigations. We believe we have adequate reserves for any liability we may incur in connection with any such currently pending or threatened matter. In our opinion, the settlement of any such currently pending or threatened matter is not expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
9. | Business and Geographic Information and Major Customers |
Segment Data We currently have two reportable segments: Dairy Group and Specialty Foods. Our Dairy Group segment manufactures and distributes milk, ice cream and ice cream novelties, half-and-half and whipping cream, cultured dairy products, fruit juices, other flavored drinks, bottled water, coffee creamers, dips and condensed milk. Specialty Foods processes and sells pickles, relishes and peppers; powdered products such as non-dairy coffee creamers; aseptic sauces and puddings and nutritional beverages.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies set forth in Note 1 to our 2002 Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K. We evaluate performance based on operating profit not including non-recurring gains and losses and foreign exchange gains and losses.
-13-
The amounts in the following tables are obtained from reports used by our executive management team and do not include any allocated income taxes or management fees. There are no significant non-cash items reported in segment profit or loss other than depreciation and amortization.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||
Net sales to external customers:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Dairy Group
|
$ | 773,762 | $ | 817,003 | $ | 1,529,887 | $ | 1,612,274 | |||||||||
Specialty Foods
|
175,676 | 177,364 | 338,614 | 338,578 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 949,438 | $ | 994,367 | $ | 1,868,501 | $ | 1,950,852 | |||||||||
Operating income:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Dairy Group(1)
|
$ | 69,041 | $ | 67,984 | $ | 129,938 | $ | 123,970 | |||||||||
Specialty Foods
|
27,018 | 25,367 | 50,845 | 46,154 | |||||||||||||
Corporate/ Other
|
(11,494 | ) | (16,608 | ) | (23,768 | ) | (32,924 | ) | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 84,565 | $ | 76,743 | $ | 157,015 | $ | 137,200 | |||||||||
At June 30, | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||||
Dairy Group
|
$ | 2,156,034 | $ | 2,149,037 | |||||
Specialty Foods
|
597,810 | 598,163 | |||||||
Corporate/ Other
|
93,626 | 208,763 | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,847,470 | $ | 2,955,963 | |||||
(1) | Operating income includes plant closing and restructuring costs of $0.5 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2003. |
Substantially all of our business is within the United States.
Significant Customers Our Dairy Group had one customer that represented greater than 10% of its sales in the half of 2003. Approximately 11% of our consolidated sales in the first half of 2003 were to that same customer.
-14-
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
We are a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dean Foods Company. Dean Foods Company is the leading processor and distributor of milk and other dairy products in the United States, and a leading manufacturer of specialty foods. Our operations consist of two segments: Dairy Group and Specialty Foods. Our Dairy Group is part of the Dairy Group segment of Dean Foods Company and our Specialty Foods segment comprises the entirety of Dean Foods Companys Specialty Foods segment.
As permitted by General Instruction H to Form 10-Q, in lieu of providing the information required by Item 2, we are providing only the information required by General Instruction H(2)(a).
Results of Operations
The following table presents certain information concerning our results of operations, including information presented as a percentage of net sales.
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollars | Percent | Dollars | Percent | Dollars | Percent | Dollars | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales
|
$ | 949,438 | 100.0 | % | $ | 994,367 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,868,501 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,950,852 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales
|
704,661 | 74.2 | 745,951 | 75.0 | 1,388,759 | 74.3 | 1,475,396 | 75.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit
|
244,777 | 25.8 | 248,416 | 25.0 | 479,742 | 25.7 | 475,456 | 24.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling and distribution
|
129,722 | 13.7 | 132,082 | 13.3 | 257,992 | 13.8 | 266,091 | 13.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative
|
29,357 | 3.0 | 38,240 | 3.9 | 62,427 | 3.4 | 69,147 | 3.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization expense
|
608 | 0.1 | 1,351 | .1 | 1,783 | 0.1 | 3,018 | .2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plant closing and restructuring costs
|
525 | 0.1 | 525 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses
|
160,212 | 16.9 | 171,673 | 17.3 | 322,727 | 17.3 | 338,256 | 17.4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total operating income
|
$ | 84,565 | 8.9 | % | $ | 76,743 | 7.7 | % | $ | 157,015 | 8.4 | % | $ | 137,200 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||
Quarter Ended June 30, 2003 Compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 2002
Net Sales Consolidated net sales decreased 4.5% to $949.4 million during the second quarter of 2003 from $994.4 million in the second quarter of 2002.
Net sales for the Dairy Group decreased 5.3%, or $43.2 million, in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002. This decrease is primarily due to the effects of decreased raw milk costs compared to the prior year. In general, we change the prices that we charge our customers for our products on a monthly basis, as the costs of our raw materials fluctuate. The following table sets forth the average monthly Class I mover and average monthly Class II minimum prices for raw skim milk and butterfat for the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002:
Quarter Ended June 30* | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | % Change | ||||||||||
Class I raw skim milk mover(3)
|
$ | 5.92 | (1) | $ | 6.99 | (1) | (15.3 | )% | ||||
Class I butterfat mover(3)
|
1.14 | (2) | 1.29 | (2) | (11.6 | )% | ||||||
Class II raw skim milk minimum(4)
|
6.62 | (1) | 7.55 | (1) | (12.3 | )% | ||||||
Class II butterfat minimum(4)
|
1.16 | (2) | 1.19 | (2) | (2.5 | )% |
* | The prices noted in this table are not the prices that we actually pay. The federal order minimum prices at any given location for Class I raw skim milk or Class I butterfat are based on the Class I mover prices plus a location differential. Class II prices noted in the table are federal minimum prices, applicable at all federally regulated locations. Our actual cost also includes producer premiums, procurement costs and other related charges that vary by location and vendor. |
-15-
(1) | Prices are per hundredweight. |
(2) | Prices are per pound. |
(3) | We process Class I raw skim milk and butterfat into fluid milk products. |
(4) | We process Class II raw skim milk and butterfat into products such as cottage cheese, creams, ice cream and sour cream. |
Net sales for our Specialty Foods segment decreased slightly by approximately 1%, or $1.7 million, during the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002. This decrease was primarily due to the sale of EBI Foods, Ltd. in October 2002 and softness in pickle volumes offset by an increase in non-dairy coffee creamer and nutritional beverage sales volumes.
Cost of Sales Our consolidated cost of sales ratio was 74.2% in the second quarter of 2003 compared to 75.0% in the second quarter of 2002. The cost of sales ratio for the Dairy Group decreased to 74.2% in the second quarter of 2003 from 75.2% in the second quarter of 2002 due primarily to lower raw milk costs and realized merger synergies. Specialty Foods cost of sales ratio increased slightly to 74.4% in the second quarter of 2003 from 74.0% in the second quarter of 2002. This increase was primarily due to an increase in packaging costs and rising commodity prices.
Operating Costs and Expenses Our consolidated operating expense ratio was 16.9% in the second quarter of 2003 compared to 17.3% during the second quarter of 2002.
The operating expense ratio at the Dairy Group was 16.9% in the second quarter of 2003 compared to 16.4% in the second quarter of 2002. The increase in the 2003 operating expense ratio was primarily due to the effect of lower raw material prices in 2003. Lower raw material prices generally result in lower sales dollars. Therefore, falling raw milk prices will generally increase the Dairy Groups operating expense ratio and rising raw milk prices will generally reduce the Dairy Groups operating expense ratio.
The operating expense ratio for Specialty Foods was 10.2% in the second quarter 2003 versus 11.8% in the second quarter 2002, primarily due to lower incentive compensation expense and the sale of EBI Foods, Ltd., which had higher operating expenses.
Operating Income Consolidated operating income during the second quarter of 2003 was $84.6 million, an increase of $7.9 million from the second quarter of 2002 operating income of $76.7 million. Our consolidated operating margin in the second quarter of 2003 was 8.9% compared to 7.7% in the second quarter of 2002.
The Dairy Groups operating margin increased to 8.9% in the second quarter of 2003 from 8.3% in the same period of 2002. This increase is primarily due to the effects of decreased raw milk costs compared to the prior year.
Specialty Foods operating margin was 15.4% in the second quarter of 2003 versus 14.3% in the second quarter of 2002. This increase was primarily due to the increase in non-dairy creamer and nutritional beverage sales and lower promotional costs for pickle products.
Other (Income) Expense Total other expense decreased by $1.0 million in the in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002. Interest expense decreased to $13.7 million in the second quarter of 2003 from $14.2 million in the second quarter of 2002 as a result of lower interest rates.
Income Taxes Income tax expense was consistent in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002 at 38.1%. Our tax rate varies as the mix of earnings contributed by our various business units changes and as tax savings initiatives are adopted.
First Six Months of 2003 Compared to First Six Months of 2002
Net Sales Consolidated net sales decreased 4.2% to $1.87 billion during the first six months of 2003 from $1.95 billion in the first six months of 2002.
-16-
Net sales for the Dairy Group decreased 5.1% or $82.4 million in the first six months of 2003 compared to the first six months of 2002. This decrease is primarily due to the effects of decreased raw milk costs compared to the prior year. In general, we change the prices that we charge our customers for our products on a monthly basis, as the costs of our raw materials fluctuate. The following table sets forth the average monthly Class I mover and average monthly Class II minimum prices for raw skim milk and butterfat for the first six months of 2003 compared to the first six months of 2002:
Six Months Ended June 30* | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | % Change | ||||||||||
Class I raw skim milk mover(3)
|
$ | 6.11 | (1) | $ | 7.07 | (1) | (13.6 | )% | ||||
Class I butterfat mover(3)
|
1.16 | (2) | 1.35 | (2) | (14.1 | )% | ||||||
Class II raw skim milk minimum(4)
|
6.81 | (1) | 7.62 | (1) | (10.6 | )% | ||||||
Class II butterfat minimum(4)
|
1.16 | (2) | 1.30 | (2) | (10.8 | )% |
* | The prices noted in this table are not the prices that we actually pay. The federal order minimum prices at any given location for Class I raw skim milk or Class I butterfat are based on the Class I mover prices plus a location differential. Class II prices noted in the table are federal minimum prices, applicable at all federally regulated locations. Our actual cost also includes producer premiums, procurement costs and other related charges that vary by location and vendor. |
(1) | Prices are per hundredweight. |
(2) | Prices are per pound. |
(3) | We process Class I raw skim milk and butterfat into fluid milk products. |
(4) | We process Class II raw skim milk and butterfat into products such as cottage cheese, creams, ice cream and sour cream. |
Net sales for Specialty Foods were consistent in the first six months of 2003 compared to the same period in the prior year at $339 million. Sales increases in non-dairy coffee creamers and nutritional beverages were offset by lower sales in pickles and bulk powder, and by the decrease in sales resulting from the divestiture of EBI Foods, Ltd., in October 2002.
Cost of Sales Our consolidated cost of sales ratio was 74.3% for the first six months of 2003 compared to 75.6% in the first six months of 2002. The cost of sales ratio for the Dairy Group decreased to 74.3% in the first six months of 2003 from 75.6% in the first six months of 2002 due primarily to lower raw milk costs. Specialty Foods cost of sales ratio decreased slightly to 74.6% in the first six months of 2003 from 74.9% in the first six months of 2002. This decrease was due to synergies resulting from plant rationalization in 2002, partly offset by an increase in packaging costs and rising commodity prices.
Operating Costs and Expenses Our consolidated operating expense ratio was consistent in the first six months of 2003 at 17.3% compared to 17.4% in the first six months of 2002.
The operating expense ratio in the Dairy Group was 17.2% in the first six months of 2003 compared to 16.7% in the first six months of 2002. The increase in the 2003 operating expense ratio was primarily due to the effect of lower raw material prices in 2003. Lower raw material prices generally result in lower sales dollars. Therefore, lower raw milk prices will generally increase the Dairy Groups operating expense ratio and higher raw milk prices will generally reduce the Dairy Groups operating expense ratio.
The operating expense ratio for Specialty Foods was 10.4% in the first six months of 2003 versus 11.5% in the first six months of 2002 primarily due to lower incentive compensation expense and the sale of EBI Foods, Ltd., which had higher operating expenses.
Operating Income Consolidated operating income during the first six months of 2003 was $157.0 million, an increase of $19.8 million from the first six months of 2002 operating income of $137.2 million. Our consolidated operating margin in the first six months of 2003 was 8.4% compared to
-17-
The Dairy Groups operating margin increased to 8.5% in the first six months of 2003 from 7.7% in the same period of 2002. This increase is primarily due to the effects of decreased raw milk costs compared to the prior year, along with realized merger synergies.
Specialty Foods operating margin was 15.0% in the first six months of 2003 versus 13.6% in the first six months of 2002. This increase was primarily due to the increase in non-dairy coffee creamers and nutritional beverage sales, coupled with lower promotional costs for pickle products and synergies gained from 2002 plant closings.
Other (Income) Expense Total other expenses decreased by $0.9 million in the first six months of 2003 compared to the first six months of 2002. Interest expense decreased to $27.3 million in the first six months of 2003 from $28.3 million in the first six months of 2002 as a result of lower interest rates.
Income Taxes Income tax expense was recorded at an effective rate of 38.2% for the first six months of 2003 compared to 38.5% in the first six months of 2002. Our tax rate varies as the mix of earnings contributed by our various business units changes and the savings initiatives are adopted.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Based on their evaluations as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13-a and 15d-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
-18-
Part II Other Information
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
(a) Exhibits
31 | .1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
||
31 | .2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
||
32 | .1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
||
32 | .2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
(b) Form 8-Ks
None
-19-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DEAN HOLDING COMPANY | |
/s/ Barry A. Fromberg | |
|
|
Barry A. Fromberg | |
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer | |
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
Date: August 13, 2003
-20-
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||||
Number | Description | |||
31 | .1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
||
31 | .2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
||
32 | .1 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
||
32 | .2 |
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|