UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
(X) | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2003. |
OR
( ) | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from ____________ to ___________.
Commission file number: 0-17972
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC.
Delaware | 41-1532464 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification Number) |
11001 Bren Road East
Minnetonka,
Minnesota 55343
(952) 912-3444
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes (X) No ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes (X) No ( )
On August 12, 2003, there were 20,206,159 shares of the registrants $.01 par value Common Stock outstanding.
INDEX
Page | ||||
PART I. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION | |||
ITEM 1. | Financial Statements | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three months and nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 | 3 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002 | 4 | |||
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 | 5 | |||
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements | 6 | |||
ITEM 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition | 23 | ||
Forward-looking Statements | 23 | |||
ITEM 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 43 | ||
ITEM 4. | Disclosure Controls and Procedures | 44 | ||
PART II | OTHER INFORMATION | |||
ITEM 1. | Legal Proceedings | 44 | ||
ITEM 2. | Changes in Securities | 44 | ||
ITEM 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 44 | ||
ITEM 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 44 | ||
ITEM 5. | Other Information | 44 | ||
ITEM 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 44 |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS AND NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 AND 2002
(UNAUDITED)
Three months ended June 30 | Nine months ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 25,567,445 | $ | 26,110,138 | $ | 76,606,512 | $ | 76,453,017 | ||||||||||
Cost of sales |
10,316,051 | 11,227,836 | 30,814,138 | 34,947,291 | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
15,251,394 | 14,882,302 | 45,792,374 | 41,505,726 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
6,165,052 | 7,413,299 | 18,387,318 | 21,914,812 | ||||||||||||||
Research and development |
3,962,011 | 5,540,653 | 11,791,532 | 14,094,242 | ||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
3,972,498 | 5,118,920 | 11,837,756 | 13,951,287 | ||||||||||||||
In-process research and development |
| | 3,100,000 | |||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of MiLAN assets |
| | | 3,616,645 | ||||||||||||||
Restructuring |
(168,940 | ) | | (435,096 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
13,930,621 | 18,072,872 | 41,581,510 | 56,676,986 | ||||||||||||||
Gain from forgiveness of grant payable |
231,786 | 1,067,767 | 298,758 | 1,067,767 | ||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
1,552,559 | (2,122,803 | ) | 4,509,622 | (14,103,493 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income, net |
187,701 | 483,680 | 109,334 | 933,047 | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative
effect of accounting change |
1,740,260 | (1,639,123 | ) | 4,618,956 | (13,170,446 | ) | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
527,444 | (1,051,338 | ) | (167,882 | ) | (4,741,361 | ) | |||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of accounting change |
1,212,816 | (587,785 | ) | 4,786,838 | (8,429,085 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
| | (43,865,972 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,212,816 | $ | (587,785 | ) | $ | (39,079,134 | ) | $ | (8,429,085 | ) | |||||||
Net income (loss) per common share, basic: |
||||||||||||||||||
Before cumulative effect of accounting change |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.45 | ) | ||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
| | (2.04 | ) | | |||||||||||||
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (1.82 | ) | $ | (0.45 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) per common share, assuming dilution: |
||||||||||||||||||
Before cumulative effect of accounting change |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.45 | ) | ||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
| | (2.03 | ) | | |||||||||||||
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (1.81 | ) | $ | (0.45 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares, basic |
20,599,156 | 22,176,086 | 21,515,946 | 18,823,398 | ||||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares, assuming dilution |
20,785,859 | 22,176,086 | 21,607,304 | 18,823,398 | ||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AS OF JUNE 30, 2003 AND SEPTEMBER 30, 2002
June 30 | September 30 | ||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
(unaudited) | |||||||||||
ASSETS |
|||||||||||
Current assets: |
|||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 18,706,779 | $ | 33,490,395 | |||||||
Marketable securities |
35,795,105 | 24,660,746 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
11,812,433 | 10,518,032 | |||||||||
Inventories |
10,816,312 | 12,490,767 | |||||||||
Other |
4,836,993 | 5,141,439 | |||||||||
Total current assets |
81,967,622 | 86,301,379 | |||||||||
Property, equipment and improvements, net |
20,620,891 | 21,538,987 | |||||||||
Goodwill, net |
3,854,462 | 45,835,631 | |||||||||
Identifiable intangible assets, net |
20,517,139 | 25,850,664 | |||||||||
Net deferred tax assets |
2,745,059 | | |||||||||
Other |
1,175,285 | 1,301,034 | |||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 130,880,458 | $ | 180,827,695 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
|||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 775,877 | $ | 891,220 | |||||||
Accounts payable |
7,275,820 | 6,591,235 | |||||||||
Income taxes payable |
5,879,296 | 3,154,359 | |||||||||
Accrued expenses: |
|||||||||||
Compensation |
3,558,566 | 4,285,507 | |||||||||
Deferred revenue |
637,581 | 675,730 | |||||||||
Other |
4,132,104 | 5,537,936 | |||||||||
Restructuring accruals |
199,870 | 2,503,820 | |||||||||
Total current liabilities |
22,459,114 | 23,639,807 | |||||||||
Long-term debt |
4,768,605 | 4,988,591 | |||||||||
Net deferred tax liabilities |
| 1,019,676 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
27,227,719 | 29,648,074 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
|||||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
|||||||||||
Preferred stock, $.01 par value; 2,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued and outstanding |
|||||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized;
23,154,272 and 23,154,081 shares issued |
231,543 | 231,541 | |||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
117,577,384 | 120,004,008 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
7,762,577 | 46,841,711 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(490,884 | ) | (70,528 | ) | |||||||
125,080,620 | 167,006,732 | ||||||||||
Unearned stock compensation |
(108,456 | ) | (327,310 | ) | |||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,014,210 and 926,210 shares |
(21,319,425 | ) | (15,499,801 | ) | |||||||
Total stockholders equity |
103,652,739 | 151,179,621 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 130,880,458 | $ | 180,827,695 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 AND 2002
(UNAUDITED)
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||
Operating activities: |
|||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (39,079,134 | ) | $ | (8,429,085 | ) | |||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to
net cash provided by operating activities |
|||||||||||
Acquired in-process research and development |
| 3,100,000 | |||||||||
Loss on sale of MiLAN assets |
| 3,616,645 | |||||||||
Gain from forgiveness of grant payable |
(298,758 | ) | (1,067,767 | ) | |||||||
Restructuring |
(435,096 | ) | | ||||||||
Depreciation of property and equipment |
2,304,953 | 2,533,251 | |||||||||
Amortization of intangible and other assets |
5,659,305 | 5,766,093 | |||||||||
Goodwill impairment charge |
43,865,972 | | |||||||||
Provision for bad debts and product returns |
40,000 | 110,191 | |||||||||
Provision for inventory obsolescence |
910,581 | 917,000 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(1,415,000 | ) | | ||||||||
(Gain) loss on sale of fixed assets |
(2,988 | ) | 7,716 | ||||||||
Stock compensation |
76,141 | 78,941 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
(2,681,235 | ) | 1,055,640 | ||||||||
Total adjustments |
48,023,875 | 16,117,710 | |||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
8,944,741 | 7,688,625 | |||||||||
Investing activities: |
|||||||||||
(Purchase) sale of held-to-maturity marketable securities, net |
(11,134,359 | ) | 3,131,491 | ||||||||
Proceeds from sale of MiLAN assets |
| 8,058,932 | |||||||||
Business acquisition, net of cash acquired |
| (10,418,955 | ) | ||||||||
Contingent purchase price payments related to
business acquisitions |
(2,018,157 | ) | (2,931,910 | ) | |||||||
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets |
6,447 | | |||||||||
Purchase of property and equipment and certain other
intangible assets |
(1,079,367 | ) | (653,810 | ) | |||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(14,225,436 | ) | (2,814,252 | ) | |||||||
Financing activities: |
|||||||||||
Payments under line of credit |
| 473,251 | |||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(1,297,199 | ) | (1,399,287 | ) | |||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
(8,554,833 | ) | | ||||||||
Stock benefit plan transactions |
451,301 | 562,888 | |||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(9,400,731 | ) | (363,148 | ) | |||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
(102,190 | ) | 27,282 | ||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
(14,783,616 | ) | 4,538,507 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
33,490,395 | 30,347,253 | |||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 18,706,779 | $ | 34,885,760 | |||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. | BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
The interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q have been prepared by Digi International Inc. (the Company or Digi), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures, normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to such rules and regulations. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Companys 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein as of June 30, 2003, and for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, reflect, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (which, other than the first quarter 2003 change in accounting principle as described in Note 5, consist only of normal, recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the consolidated financial position and the consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The consolidated results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.
2. | ACQUISITIONS |
On February 13, 2002, the Company acquired NetSilicon, Inc. (NetSilicon), a provider of silicon-based embedded networking solutions for a purchase price of $67,153,231. The transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as summarized below:
Fair value of tangible assets acquired |
$ | 5,596,438 | |||
Identifiable intangible assets: |
|||||
Purchased and core technology |
11,100,000 | ||||
License agreements |
2,400,000 | ||||
Patents and trademarks |
1,300,000 | ||||
Customer maintenance contracts |
700,000 | ||||
Customer relationships |
2,200,000 | ||||
Acquired in-process research and development |
3,100,000 | ||||
Goodwill |
39,249,915 | ||||
Deferred compensation |
543,819 | ||||
Acquired deferred tax asset |
7,866,059 | ||||
Deferred tax liabilities related to identifiable
intangibles |
(6,903,000 | ) | |||
$ | 67,153,231 | ||||
As of June 30, 2003, the remaining goodwill associated with the NetSilicon acquisition is $550,961, none of which is deductible for tax purposes. As discussed further in Note 5, the majority of the goodwill recorded upon acquisition was determined to be impaired during the first quarter of fiscal 2003
The Companys acquisition was made principally due to the complementary nature of the two companies device connectivity products, which would give the Company an expanded range of products and technology and allow the Company to be an early entrant in the embedded system market.
6
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
2. | ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED) |
The purchase consideration and related transaction costs include $16,315,532 in cash, Digis common stock with a market value of $41,732,231, and replacement stock options issued by Digi to certain NetSilicon common stock option holders with an estimated fair value of $9,105,468. The cash and Digis common stock were issued in exchange for all outstanding shares of NetSilicons common stock and Digis common stock options were issued in exchange for certain outstanding NetSilicon common stock options. The value of the Digi common stock was based on a per share value of approximately $6.21, calculated as the average market price of Digis common stock during the five business days immediately preceding and subsequent to the date the parties reached agreement on terms and announced the proposed acquisition. The value of Digis common stock options is based on the estimated fair value of these options, as of the date the transaction was announced, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Unearned compensation of $543,819 has been recorded related to the intrinsic value of the unvested replacement common stock options for which future services are required before the option holders vest in the replacement options.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of operations have been prepared as if the acquisition of NetSilicon had occurred as of the beginning of fiscal 2002.
In the table below, pro forma adjustments relating to NetSilicon include amortization of identifiable intangible assets, but exclude the amortization of goodwill in accordance with the provisions of FAS 142 (as this acquisition occurred after June 30, 2001). The pro forma net loss for the nine months ended June 30, 2002 does not include the $3,100,000 charge related to acquired in-process research and development.
Nine months ended | ||||
June 30, 2002 | ||||
Net sales |
$ | 85,992,539 | ||
Net loss |
$ | (10,910,343 | ) | |
Net loss per share |
$ | (0.49 | ) |
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results that would have occurred had the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of fiscal 2002, nor are they necessarily indicative of the results that will be obtained in the future.
3. | GAIN FROM FORGIVENESS OF GRANT PAYABLE |
In connection with the acquisition of ITK International, Inc. (ITK) in July 1998, the Company assumed a liability for an investment grant payable of $1,525,410 to the German government relating to construction of the ITK facility in Dortmund, Germany. The investment grant contained a provision that the grant would be forgiven if ITK retained a specified number of employees in the facility for a five-year period. Because ITK was not in compliance with the minimum employment requirements of the grant at the time of the acquisition or subsequent to the acquisition, the Company continued to reflect the grant payable as a liability and to accrue interest on the principal balance of the grant.
During 2000, the Company applied for a waiver of the employment provision in the investment grant, based on unforeseeable developments in the European market that resulted in a smaller workforce. The waiver of the investment grant payable was approved in May 2002 by the German government. Accordingly, the Company reversed a portion of the investment grant payable and the related accrued interest payable of $1,067,767 and $456,859, respectively. The principal portion of the forgiveness of the investment grant is recorded as a component of operating loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2002, and the reversal of the accrued interest payable
7
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
3. | GAIN FROM FORGIVENESS OF GRANT PAYABLE (CONTINUED) |
is recorded as a component of other income. The Companys consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2002 still reflected an investment grant payable and accrued interest payable of $457,643 and $6,103, respectively.
During the nine months ended June 30, 2003, the Company reversed an additional $298,758 of the investment grant payable related to the portion of the grant payable that has been forgiven as a result of the Company remaining in the building through June 30, 2003. The principal portion of the forgiveness of the investment grant is recorded as a component of operating income in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003. The Companys consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2003 still reflects an investment grant payable and accrued interest payable of $158,885 and $6,103, respectively. The Company anticipates it will remain in the building through August 2003, at which time, these amounts will also be forgiven.
4. | LOSS ON SALE OF MiLAN ASSETS |
On March 25, 2002, the Company sold substantially all of the assets of its former MiLAN Technology division (MiLAN) to Communications Systems, Inc. (CSI) for $8,059,000, resulting in a pre tax loss of $3,616,645 ($3,106,698 net of taxes). Included in the net loss on this transaction is $908,000 of severance costs related to certain former employees of MiLAN.
5. | GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE |
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (FAS 141), and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (FAS 142). FAS 141 eliminates the pooling-of-interests method of accounting for business combinations, requiring that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 be accounted for using the purchase method. FAS 142 provides that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized, but rather are reviewed for impairment at least annually and more frequently in certain circumstances using a two-step process. The first step is to identify a potential impairment and, in transition, this step must be measured as of the beginning of the fiscal year. The second step of the goodwill impairment test measures the amount of the impairment loss (measured as of the beginning of the year of adoption), if any, and must be completed by the end of the Companys fiscal year. In addition, FAS 142 expands the disclosure requirements about goodwill and other intangible assets in the years subsequent to their acquisition. The Company has adopted the provisions of FAS 142 as of October 1, 2002. However, the transition provisions of FAS 142 apply to the Companys accounting for the NetSilicon acquisition as this acquisition occurred after June 30, 2001.
In connection with the adoption of FAS 142, the Company engaged an appraiser to determine the fair value of the Company as of October 1, 2002 as part of the Companys adoption of FAS 142 effective that date. Based on this valuation, which utilized a discounted cash flow valuation technique using fair values indicated by both the income approach and the market approach, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $43,865,972 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, attributable primarily to an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill related to the acquisition of NetSilicon and goodwill related to the Central Data Corporation and INXTECH acquisitions. The impairment resulted from significant changes in the Companys expected future cash flows that resulted from a decline in anticipated future revenues due both to the general downturn in the U.S. and worldwide economy and to a severe downturn in
8
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
5. | GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE (CONTINUED) |
the networking and communications and semiconductor sectors of the technology industry. As a result of the downturn in expected future revenues and a substantial decline in the Companys market capitalization during 2002, the indicated fair values of the Companys reporting units had declined substantially since the acquisitions of NetSilicon, Central Data Corporation and INXTECH. The charge is reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. There was no income tax effect associated with this impairment charge.
The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment assessment for its NetSilicon and Inside Out Networks reporting units as of June 30, 2003. A discounted cash flow technique was utilized in determining the fair value of each reporting unit. Since the calculated fair value of each reporting unit exceeded book value, there was no impairment identified. Goodwill of $3,854,462 remains on the Companys balance sheet as of June 30, 2003.
If FAS 142 had been in effect in fiscal 2002, results of operations for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 would have been as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
For the three months ended | For the nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss): |
|||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative
effect of accounting change |
$ | 1,213 | $ | (588 | ) | $ | 4,787 | $ | (8,429 | ) | |||||||
Add back: goodwill and assembled
workforce amortization, net of tax |
| 582 | | 1,882 | |||||||||||||
Adjusted income (loss) before cumulative
effect of accounting change |
$ | 1,213 | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 4,787 | $ | (6,547 | ) | |||||||
Basic income (loss) per common share: |
|||||||||||||||||
Reported income (loss) before cumulative
effect of accounting change |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.45 | ) | |||||||
Add back: goodwill and assembled
workforce amortization, net of tax |
| 0.03 | | 0.10 | |||||||||||||
Adjusted income (loss) before cumulative
effect of accounting change |
$ | 0.06 | $ | | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.35 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted income (loss) per common share: |
|||||||||||||||||
Reported income (loss) before cumulative
effect of accounting change |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.45 | ) | |||||||
Add back: goodwill and assembled
workforce amortization, net of tax |
| 0.03 | | 0.10 | |||||||||||||
Adjusted income (loss) before cumulative
effect of accounting change |
$ | 0.06 | $ | | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.35 | ) | ||||||||
9
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
5. | GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE (CONTINUED) |
Amortized intangible assets as of June 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, are comprised of the following (in thousands):
As of June 30, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
Connectivity Solutions Segment | Device Networking Segment | ||||||||||||||||
Gross carrying | Accumulated | Gross carrying | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||
amount | amortization | amount | amortization | ||||||||||||||
Purchased and core technology |
$ | 20,114 | $ | (14,039 | ) | $ | 11,100 | $ | (2,544 | ) | |||||||
License agreements |
40 | (22 | ) | 2,400 | (550 | ) | |||||||||||
Patents and trademarks |
974 | (510 | ) | 1,350 | (298 | ) | |||||||||||
Customer maintenance contracts |
| | 700 | (96 | ) | ||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
| | 2,200 | (302 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 21,128 | $ | (14,571 | ) | $ | 17,750 | $ | (3,790 | ) | |||||||
As of September 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||
Connectivity Solutions Segment | Device Networking Segment | ||||||||||||||||
Gross carrying | Accumulated | Gross carrying | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||
amount | amortization | amount | amortization | ||||||||||||||
Purchased and core technology |
$ | 19,750 | $ | (10,902 | ) | $ | 11,100 | $ | (1,156 | ) | |||||||
License agreements |
40 | (16 | ) | 2,400 | (250 | ) | |||||||||||
Patents and trademarks |
797 | (400 | ) | 1,350 | (135 | ) | |||||||||||
Customer maintenance contracts |
| | 700 | (44 | ) | ||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
| | 2,200 | (138 | ) | ||||||||||||
Assembled workforce |
1,130 | (575 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 21,717 | $ | (11,893 | ) | $ | 17,750 | $ | (1,723 | ) | |||||||
10
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
5. | GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE (CONTINUED) |
Amortization expense for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 is as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Connectivity | Device | Connectivity | Device | ||||||||||||||
Solutions | Networking | Solutions | Networking | ||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Segment | Segment | ||||||||||||||
Purchased and core technology |
$ | 1,065 | $ | 463 | $ | 945 | $ | 463 | |||||||||
License agreements |
2 | 100 | 2 | 100 | |||||||||||||
Patents and trademarks |
39 | 54 | 37 | 54 | |||||||||||||
Customer maintenance contracts |
| 17 | | 17 | |||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
| 55 | | 55 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,106 | $ | 689 | $ | 984 | $ | 689 | |||||||||
Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | ||||||||||||||||
Connectivity | Device | Connectivity | Device | ||||||||||||||
Solutions | Networking | Solutions | Networking | ||||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Segment | Segment | ||||||||||||||
Purchased and core technology |
$ | 3,137 | $ | 1,388 | $ | 2,734 | $ | 694 | |||||||||
License agreements |
6 | 300 | 6 | 150 | |||||||||||||
Patents and trademarks |
110 | 163 | 111 | 81 | |||||||||||||
Customer maintenance contracts |
| 52 | | 26 | |||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
| 164 | | 82 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 3,253 | $ | 2,067 | $ | 2,851 | $ | 1,033 | |||||||||
11
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
5. | GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE (CONTINUED) |
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 are as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal 2003 | Fiscal 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Connectivity | Device | Connectivity | Device | |||||||||||||
Solutions | Networking | Solutions | Networking | |||||||||||||
Segment | Segment | Segment | Segment | |||||||||||||
Beginning balance, October 1 |
$ | 6,842 | $ | 38,994 | $ | 10,521 | $ | | ||||||||
Assembled workforce, net of tax, reclassified
to goodwill at October 1, 2002 |
338 | | | | ||||||||||||
Goodwill associated with NetSilicon acquisition |
| | | 39,116 | ||||||||||||
Transition impairment loss |
(5,423 | ) | (38,443 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Amortization of goodwill prior to
adoption of FAS 142 |
| | (1,723 | ) | | |||||||||||
Goodwill associated with the sale of MiLAN |
| | (2,631 | ) | | |||||||||||
Other, primarily contingent purchase
price payments made |
1,546 | | 1,225 | | ||||||||||||
Ending balance, June 30 |
$ | 3,303 | $ | 551 | $ | 7,392 | $ | 39,116 | ||||||||
The Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $38,443,000 related to the NetSilicon reporting unit and $5,422,972 related to the Digi reporting unit upon adoption of FAS 142 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, based upon the implied fair value of goodwill as determined pursuant to FAS 142.
Amortization expense related to intangible assets amounted to $1,794,842 and $5,320,131 for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003. Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of fiscal 2003 and the five succeeding years is as follows (in thousands):
2003(three months) |
$ | 1,325 | ||
2004 |
5,136 | |||
2005 |
4,956 | |||
2006 |
4,159 | |||
2007 |
2,917 | |||
2008 |
1,425 |
6. | WARRANTY COSTS |
The Company, in general, warrants its products to be free from defects in material and workmanship under normal use and service for a period of one to five years from the date of receipt. The Company has the option to repair or replace products it deems defective due to material or workmanship. Estimated
12
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
6. | WARRANTY COSTS (CONTINUED) |
warranty costs are accrued in the period that the related revenue is recognized based upon an estimated average per unit repair or replacement cost applied to the estimated number of units under warranty. These estimates are based upon historical warranty incidence and are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure the adequacy of the warranty reserve. The following table summarizes the activity associated with the product warranty liability accrual for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:
Three months ended | ||||||||||||||||
Accruals for | ||||||||||||||||
Fiscal | Balance at | warranties | Settlements | Balance at | ||||||||||||
year | March 31 | issued | made | June 30 | ||||||||||||
2003 |
$ | 878,623 | $ | 118,415 | $ | (118,415 | ) | $ | 878,623 | |||||||
2002 |
$ | 877,650 | $ | 124,292 | $ | (124,292 | ) | $ | 877,650 |
Nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
Accruals for | ||||||||||||||||
Fiscal | Balance at | warranties | Settlements | Balance at | ||||||||||||
year | September 30 | issued | made | June 30 | ||||||||||||
2003 |
$ | 894,875 | $ | 317,527 | $ | (333,779 | ) | $ | 878,623 | |||||||
2002 |
$ | 800,000 | $ | 531,302 | $ | (453,652 | ) | $ | 877,650 |
The Company is not responsible and does not warrant that custom software versions created by original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers based upon the Companys software source code will function in a particular way, conform to any specifications, are fit for any particular purpose and does not indemnify these customers from any third party liabilities as it relates to or arises from any customization or modifications made by the OEM customer.
7. | GUARANTEE UNDER LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENT |
The Company maintains a line of credit in Europe with Deutsche Bank. Borrowings under the line of credit are limited to and collateralized by an amount maintained in a time deposit in a New York Deutsche Bank account. The principal amount of the time deposit was $1,250,000 as of June 30, 2003. This time deposit is included in marketable securities at June 30, 2003 and will mature on September 25, 2003. Upon maturity, the Company may withdraw the time deposit if there are no outstanding borrowings on the line of credit or, the Company may elect to renew the time deposit to secure anticipated line of credit borrowings. Deutsche Bank may, at its option, appropriate and apply the balance of the time deposit toward payment of any outstanding borrowings under the line of credit whether or not any part of the line of credit is due and payable. There were no outstanding balances on the line of credit as of June 30, 2003 or September 30, 2002.
8. | RESTRUCTURING |
In September 2002, the Company implemented two restructuring plans, resulting in workforce reductions of 88 employees worldwide. The Company recorded a charge of $1,646,386, consisting of $1,386,042 for severance and termination costs related to the elimination of 24 positions in Minnetonka, Minnesota, 4 positions in Dortmund, Germany, and 19 positions in France. The charge also consisted of $72,000 related to the closure of the Les Lucs office for lease cancellation and office closing expenses, $29,448 of cancellation fees for automobile leases in Dortmund, Germany, and $158,896 related to legal and professional fees in Dortmund, Germany and Les Lucs, France. A second restructuring charge of
13
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
8. | RESTRUCTURING (CONTINUED) |
$1,049,595 was recorded for the NetSilicon operations and included $764,317 for severance and termination costs related to the elimination of 34 positions in Waltham, Massachusetts, 1 in Tokyo, Japan, 1 in Munich, Germany, and 5 in Newbury Park, California. The charge also consisted of $249,758 related to the closure of the Newbury Park, California office, the Munich, Germany office, and other office closing expenses, and $35,520 of cancellation fees related to automobile leases in Munich, Germany.
The Company expects to complete the September 2002 restructuring activities by March 31, 2004 as certain automobile and building lease payments are scheduled to be paid through that date. Cash outlays of $192,161, $1,164,381, $626,344 and $78,129 were charged against the restructuring accruals during the fourth quarter of 2002 and the first, second and third quarters of fiscal 2003, respectively. These cash outlays were funded by cash generated from the Companys operations. The Company recorded a change in estimate adjustment of $435,096 in the nine months ended June 30, 2003 that was reflected as a reduction in the restructuring accrual and a corresponding increase to operating income. The change in estimate resulted primarily from favorable settlements of previously agreed to severance amounts including related legal fees. The Company anticipates the majority of future cash outlays will occur in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003 with a small amount occurring in the first and second quarters of 2004 related to building and automobile lease cancellation fees. These anticipated future cash outlays will be funded by cash generated from the Companys operations.
In September 2001, the Company implemented a restructuring plan that resulted in a workforce reduction of 50 employees in Minnetonka, Minnesota and 11 employees in Sunnyvale, California. A charge of $1,351,870 was recorded for severance and outplacement costs. All of these costs were paid in fiscal 2002.
The Companys restructuring activities are summarized as follows:
Balance at | Change in | |||||||||||||||||
September 30, | Estimate | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||
Description | 2002 | Payments | Adjustments | June 30, 2003 | ||||||||||||||
September 2002 Digi Restructuring Plan: |
||||||||||||||||||
- Severance and termination costs |
$ | 1,386,042 | $ | (1,042,848 | ) | $ | (343,194 | ) | $ | | ||||||||
- Building closing / lease cancellation fees |
72,000 | (56,087 | ) | (15,913 | ) | | ||||||||||||
- Cancellation fees for automobile leases |
29,448 | (7,766 | ) | (3,282 | ) | 18,400 | ||||||||||||
- Legal and Professional Fees |
158,896 | (46,116 | ) | (72,707 | ) | 40,073 | ||||||||||||
Subtotal |
1,646,386 | (1,152,817 | ) | (435,096 | ) | 58,473 | ||||||||||||
September 2002 NetSilicon Restructuring Plan: |
||||||||||||||||||
- Severance and termination costs |
660,538 | (641,135 | ) | | 19,403 | |||||||||||||
- Building closing / lease cancellation fees |
161,376 | (39,382 | ) | | 121,994 | |||||||||||||
- Cancellation fees for automobile leases |
35,520 | (35,520 | ) | | | |||||||||||||
Subtotal |
857,434 | (716,037 | ) | | 141,397 | |||||||||||||
Totals |
$ | 2,503,820 | $ | (1,868,854 | ) | $ | (435,096 | ) | $ | 199,870 | ||||||||
14
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
9. | INVENTORIES |
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined on the first-in, first-out method. Inventories at June 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002 consisted of the following:
June. 30, 2003 | Sept. 30, 2002 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 7,507,148 | $ | 9,579,271 | ||||
Work in process |
1,006,394 | 353,470 | ||||||
Finished goods |
2,302,770 | 2,558,026 | ||||||
$ | 10,816,312 | $ | 12,490,767 | |||||
10. | SEGMENT INFORMATION |
Prior to the acquisition of NetSilicon, as described in Note 2, the Company operated in a single reportable business segment. With the acquisition of NetSilicon, the Company now operates in two reportable segments. The Company has determined that Inside Out Networks can be aggregated with all other operations of the Company, excluding NetSilicon and the Device Server product line, that together are reported as the Connectivity Solutions reporting segment. The NetSilicon operating segment and the Device Server product line comprise the Device Networking Solutions reporting segment, formerly known as Embedded Networking Solutions, prior to fiscal year 2003.
In fiscal 2003, the Company changed the way it reviews results and assesses performance of its Device Server business, due to the tight integration of the Device Server and NetSilicon product lines and the business strategy that is being employed to migrate customers from external box connectivity solutions to embedded networking solutions. As a result of this business strategy the Company now views Device Servers as part of the Device Networking segment effective for the period beginning October 1, 2002. Comparative fiscal 2002 results have been reclassified to reflect the current year presentation. However, as a result of the acquisition of NetSilicon on February 13, 2002, these 2002 results include financial results of NetSilicon beginning with the acquisition date.
The reportable segments in which the Company operates include the following:
Connectivity Solutions Connectivity solutions are used by businesses to create, customize, and control retail operations, industrial automation, and other applications. The primary product lines include multi- port serial adaptors, terminal servers, and Universal Serial Bus (USB) connectivity. This reporting segment is comprised of two operating segments. The operating segments include the Universal Serial Bus products associated with the Companys Inside Out Networks subsidiary, and the products associated with all other operations of the Company, excluding NetSilicon and the Device Server product line. The Companys Connectivity Solutions segment has operating facilities located in Minnetonka, Minnesota; Austin, Texas; Torrance, California (Inside Out Networks); and Dortmund, Germany.
Device Networking Solutions Device Networking Solutions are integrated hardware and software solutions for manufacturers who want to build network-ready products. This family of solutions integrates network-enabled microprocessors (specialized computer chips), an operating system, networking software, development tools, and a high level of technical support. The primary product lines include device servers, integrated semiconductor and controller products. In addition, the Company licenses software products that are embedded into electronic devices to enable Internet and Web-based communications. The
15
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. | SEGMENT INFORMATION (CONTINUED) |
operations of NetSilicon and the Device Server product line comprise this segment. NetSilicon is located in Waltham, Massachusetts.
Summary financial data by business segment is presented below for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:
Three months ended June 30, 2003 | Three months ended June 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Connectivity | Device | Connectivity | Device | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Solutions | Networking | Total | Solutions | Networking | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 17,481 | $ | 8,086 | $ | 25,567 | $ | 19,363 | $ | 6,747 | $ | 26,110 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
4,559 | (3,006 | ) | 1,553 | 3,850 | (5,973 | ) | (2,123 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 108,008 | $ | 22,872 | $ | 130,880 | $ | 115,958 | $ | 69,892 | $ | 185,850 |
Nine months ended June 30, 2003 | Nine months ended June 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Connectivity | Device | Connectivity | Device | |||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Solutions | Networking | Total | Solutions | Networking | Total | ||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 53,730 | $ | 22,877 | $ | 76,607 | $ | 65,130 | $ | 11,323 | $ | 76,453 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
13,921 | (9,411 | ) | 4,510 | (2,201 | ) | (11,902 | ) | (14,103 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 108,008 | $ | 22,872 | $ | 130,880 | $ | 115,958 | $ | 69,892 | $ | 185,850 |
The Company considers operating income (loss) to be the primary measure by which it measures the operating performance of each segment. A reconciliation of the Companys consolidated segment operating income (loss) to consolidated income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change follows:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | 2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) - Connectivity
Solutions |
$ | 4,559 | $ | 3,850 | $ | 13,921 | $ | (2,201 | ) | |||||||
Operating
loss - Device Networking |
(3,006 | ) | (5,973 | ) | (9,411 | ) | (11,902 | ) | ||||||||
1,553 | (2,123 | ) | 4,510 | (14,103 | ) | |||||||||||
Other income, net |
187 | 484 | 109 | 933 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated income (loss) before income
taxes and cumulative effect of accounting change |
$ | 1,740 | $ | (1,639 | ) | $ | 4,619 | $ | (13,170 | ) | ||||||
16
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
10. | SEGMENT INFORMATION (CONTINUED) |
The Company adopted the provisions of FAS 142 (see Note 5) on October 1, 2002. In connection with the adoption of FAS 142, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $43,865,972 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, attributable to an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill related to the NetSilicon acquisition and other acquisitions. The Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge related to the Device Networking Solutions and Connectivity Solutions segments of $38,443,000 and $5,422,972, respectively. The charge is reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle.
The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment assessment for its NetSilicon and Inside Out Networks reporting units as of June 30, 2003. A discounted cash flow technique was utilized in determining the fair value of each reporting unit. Since the calculated fair value of each reporting unit exceeded book value, there was no impairment identified. Goodwill of $3,854,462 remains on the Companys balance sheet as of June 30, 2003.
11. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
The Company applies the intrinsic-value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations to account for stock-based compensation. Accordingly, compensation costs for stock options granted to employees are measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the Companys stock at the date of grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock. Such compensation costs, if any, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the option vesting schedule.
Had the Company applied the fair value recognition provisions of FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based compensation, the Companys net income (loss) and net income (loss) per share would have decreased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
Three months ended June 30 | Nine months ended June 30 | |||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) as reported |
$ | 1,212,816 | $ | (587,785 | ) | $ | (39,079,134 | ) | $ | (8,429,085 | ) | |||||||
Add: Total stock-based employee
compensation expense included in
reported net income, net of related
tax effects |
11,893 | 34,577 | 46,446 | 51,865 | ||||||||||||||
Deduct : Total stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under
fair value based method for all awards,
net of related tax effects |
(583,444 | ) | (866,389 | ) | (1,896,981 | ) | (4,389,408 | ) | ||||||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
$ | 641,265 | $ | (1,419,597 | ) | $ | (40,929,669 | ) | $ | (12,766,628 | ) | |||||||
Income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||||
Basic - as reported |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (1.82 | ) | $ | (0.45 | ) | |||||||
Basic - pro forma |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (1.90 | ) | $ | (0.68 | ) | |||||||
Diluted
- - as reported |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (1.81 | ) | $ | (0.45 | ) | |||||||
Diluted - pro forma |
$ | 0.03 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | (1.89 | ) | $ | (0.68 | ) |
17
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
12. | INCOME TAXES |
In March 2003, the Company reversed the valuation allowance associated with its German net operating loss carryforwards. The valuation allowance was reversed based upon current and anticipated future taxable income generated by the Companys German operations. The portion of the valuation allowance related to the German net operating loss carryforwards that are expected to be utilized by the Company during the year ended September 30, 2003 has been accounted for by reducing the effective income tax rate for the current year. The portion of the valuation allowance related to the German net operating loss carryforwards that are expected to be utilized by the Company during periods subsequent to September 30, 2003 has been accounted for as a discrete event and resulted in an income tax benefit of $1,415,000 being recorded during the three month period ended March 31, 2003.
Income taxes have been provided for at effective rates of 3.6% and 36.0% for the nine-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The effective rate for the nine month period ended June 30, 2003, adjusted for the $1,415,000 income tax benefit related to the German net operating loss carryforwards that are expected to be utilized by the Company during periods subsequent to September 30, 2003, is 27.0 %, compared to 36.0% for the nine month period ended June 30, 2002. The decrease in the effective rate is primarily due to foreign sourced income taxed at a lower rate than the U.S. statutory rate.
The Company is required to assess the realizability of its deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance against those assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109. Although realization of the associated deferred tax assets is not assured, the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that remaining deferred tax assets will be realized based on future projected taxable income and the anticipated future reversal of deferred tax liabilities, and therefore no valuation allowance has been established at June 30, 2003. The amount of the net deferred tax assets realized, however, could vary if there are differences in the timing or amount of future reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities or changes in the amounts of future taxable income. If the Companys future taxable income tax projections are not realized, a valuation allowance would be required, and would be reflected as income tax expense at that time.
13. | COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
The components of total comprehensive income (loss) are shown below. Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and foreign currency translation adjustments that are charged or credited to stockholders equity.
Comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 was as follows:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,212,816 | $ | (587,785 | ) | $ | (39,079,134 | ) | $ | (8,429,085 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency translation
adjustments |
(234,662 | ) | (220,972 | ) | (420,356 | ) | (21,550 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income (loss) |
$ | 978,154 | $ | (808,757 | ) | $ | (39,499,490 | ) | $ | (8,450,635 | ) | |||||
18
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
14. | NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE |
Basic net income (loss) per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Net income (loss) per share, assuming dilution, is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. The Companys only common equivalent shares are those that result from dilutive common stock options.
The following table is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators in the income (loss) per share calculations:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
June 30 | June 30 | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
Numerator: |
|||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 1,212,816 | $ | (587,785 | ) | $ | (39,079,134 | ) | $ | (8,429,085 | ) | ||||||
Denominator: |
|||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic income (loss) per
share - weighted average shares
outstanding |
20,599,156 | 22,176,086 | 21,515,946 | 18,823,398 | |||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|||||||||||||||||
Employee stock options |
186,703 | | 91,358 | | |||||||||||||
Denominator for diluted income (loss) per
share - adjusted weighted average shares |
20,785,859 | 22,176,086 | 21,607,304 | 18,823,398 | |||||||||||||
Basic income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (1.82 | ) | $ | (0.45 | ) | ||||||
Diluted income (loss) per share |
$ | 0.06 | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (1.81 | ) | $ | (0.45 | ) | ||||||
Common equivalent shares of 9,999 and 64,869 for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2002 resulting from common stock options were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share as their effect is antidilutive because of the net losses incurred by the Company during these periods. Had the Company generated net income during these periods, these equivalent shares related to outstanding options would have been included in the computation of diluted income per share.
Options to purchase 5,516,464 shares and 5,541,964 shares for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2003, and options to purchase 6,353,286 and 5,096,866 shares for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2002, were not included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per share because the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of common shares and therefore their effect would be antidilutive whether or not the Company generated net income.
Pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, Earnings per Share, income before cumulative effect of accounting change has been used in determining diluted income per share for the nine months ended June 30, 2003.
19
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
15. | RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS |
In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (FAS 146). This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and the recognition of a liability for those related costs. The principal difference between FAS 146 and prior guidance relates to its requirements for recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity. FAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred. Under previous rules, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entitys commitment to an exit plan. Generally, the provisions of FAS 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. The Company did not adopt FAS No. 146 early and the Company has undertaken no exit or disposal activities in the first nine months of fiscal 2003. Accordingly, adoption of this standard did not impact the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In December 2002, the FASB issued FAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition Disclosure an amendment of FAS 123 (FAS 148). This Statement amends FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of Statement 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The provisions of FAS 148 are effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002, and disclosure requirements are effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company has no immediate plans to change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. The Company has made the additional stock based employee compensation disclosures required by FAS 148 beginning in the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. This interpretation elaborates on the disclosures required in financial statements concerning obligations under certain guarantees. It also clarifies the requirements related to the recognition of liabilities by a guarantor at the inception of certain guarantees. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of this interpretation for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002 and, accordingly, are reflected in the Companys financial statement disclosures related to accounting for warranty costs in Note 6 and line of credit guarantee in Note 7. The recognition provisions of this interpretation are effective for the Company for fiscal 2003 and are applicable only to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this interpretation did not have an impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which addresses accounting for special-purpose and variable interest entities. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of this interpretation for financial statements issued after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this interpretation did not have an impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
20
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
15. | RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS (CONTINUED) |
In April 2003, the FASB issued FAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 149). This Statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. The provisions of FAS 149 are effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The Company has reviewed the provisions of FAS 149 and determined that the Company does not currently have any derivative instruments or hedging activities to which FAS 149 applies. The Company will continue to monitor its activities and evaluate the applicability of FAS 149 on future transactions. The Company does not expect the adoption of this interpretation to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
In May 2003, the FASB issued FAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (FAS 150). This Statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The provisions of FAS 150 are effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities. The statement is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of the statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. The Company has not completed its analysis of the effects of FAS 150, but does not expect the adoption to impact its financial position or results of operations.
16. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
On April 19, 2002, a consolidated amended class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint, which supersedes three virtually identical complaints that had been filed from August 7, 2001 to August 31, 2001, is captioned In re NETsilicon, Inc. Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation (21 MC 92, 01 Civ. 7281 (SAS)). The complaint names as defendants NetSilicon, certain of its officers, certain underwriters involved in NetSilicons initial public offering (IPO), and the Company, and asserts, among other things, that NetSilicons IPO prospectus and registration statement violated federal securities laws because they contained material misrepresentations and/or omissions regarding the conduct of NetSilicons IPO underwriters in allocating shares in NetSilicons IPO to the underwriters customers, and that NetSilicon and the two named officers engaged in fraudulent practices with respect to this underwriters conduct. The action seeks damages, fees and costs associated with the litigation, and interest. We believe that the claims against us are without merit and have defended the litigation vigorously. Pursuant to a stipulation between the parties, the two named officers were dismissed from the lawsuit, without prejudice, on October 9, 2002. On July 15, 2002, the Company, along with 300-plus other publicly traded companies that have been named in substantially similar lawsuits, filed a collective motion to dismiss the complaint on various legal grounds common to all or most of the issuer defendants. On February 19, 2003, the Court denied the Companys motion to dismiss.
21
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
16. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS (CONTINUED) |
In June 2003, the Company, implementing the determination made by a special independent committee of the Board of Directors, elected to participate in a proposed settlement agreement with the plaintiffs in this litigation. If ultimately approved by the Court, this proposed settlement would result in a dismissal, with prejudice, of all claims in the litigation against us and against any of the other issuer defendants who elect to participate in the proposed settlement, together with the current or former officers and directors of participating issuers who were named as individual defendants. The proposed settlement does not provide for the resolution of any claims against the underwriter defendants, and the litigation as against those defendants is continuing. The proposed settlement provides that the class members in the class action cases brought against the participating issuer defendants will be guaranteed a recovery of $1 billion by insurers of the participating issuer defendants. If recoveries totaling $1 billion or more are obtained by the class members from the underwriter defendants, however, the monetary obligations to the class members under the proposed settlement will be satisfied. In addition, the Company and any other participating issuer defendants will be required to assign to the class members certain claims that they may have against the underwriters of their IPOs.
The proposed settlement contemplates that any amounts necessary to fund the settlement or settlement-related expenses would come from participating issuers directors and officers liability insurance policy proceeds as opposed to funds of the participating issuer defendants themselves. A participating issuer defendant could be required to contribute to the costs of the settlement if that issuers insurance coverage were insufficient to pay that issuers allocable share of the settlement costs. The Company expects that its insurance proceeds will be sufficient for these purposes and that it will not otherwise be required to contribute to the proposed settlement. Consummation of the proposed settlement is conditioned upon, among other things, negotiating, executing, and filing with the Court final settlement documents, and final approval by the Court. If the proposed settlement described above is not consummated, we intend to continue to defend the litigation vigorously. The litigation process is inherently uncertain and unpredictable, however, and there can be no guarantee as to the ultimate outcome of this pending lawsuit. The Company maintains liability insurance for such matters that provides for coverage of up to a maximum of $10 million per occurrence. The Company expects that the liability insurance will be adequate to cover any potential unfavorable outcome, less the applicable deductible amount of $250,000 per claim. As of September 30, 2002, the Company has accrued a liability for the deductible amount of $250,000 which the Company believes reflects the amount of loss that is probable. The Company believes the insurance claim will be approved based on discussion with representatives of the insurance company and our legal counsel who represents us in this matter. The Company also considers the realization of recovery under the insurance policy to be probable based on the insurance contract in place with a reputable and financially sound insurance company. In the event the Company has losses that exceed the limits of the liability insurance, such losses could have a material effect on the business, results of operations, or financial condition of the Company.
In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to various claims and litigation, including patent and intellectual property claims. Management of the Company expects that these various litigation items will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations or financial position of the Company.
22
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This Form 10-Q contains certain statements that are forward-looking statements as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
The words believe, anticipate, intend, estimate, target, may, will, expect, plan, project, should, or continue or the negative thereof or other expressions, which are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters, identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on information available to management as of the time of such statements and relate to, among other things, expectations of the business environment in which the Company operates, projections of future performance, perceived opportunities in the market and statements regarding the Companys mission and vision. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
The future operating results and performance trends of the Company may be affected by a number of factors, including, without limitation, those described under Risk Factors below. Those risk factors, and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions identified from time to time in the Companys filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including without limitation, its annual reports on Form 10-K, its quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and its registration statements, could cause the Companys actual future results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of the factors set forth in the Companys various filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and of changes in general economic conditions, changes in interest rates and/or exchange rates and changes in the assumptions used in making such forward-looking statements.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The Companys discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Companys consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the values of purchased assets and assumed liabilities in acquisitions. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
23
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Companys revenues are derived primarily from the sale of products to its distributors and original equipment manufacturer (OEM) customers, and to a lesser extent from the sale of software licenses, fees associated with technical support, training and engineering services and royalties. The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, collectibility is probable and there are no post-delivery obligations other than warranty. Under these criteria, product revenue is generally recognized upon shipment of product to customers, including OEMs and distributors. In some of the Companys transactions prior to March of 2002, risks and rewards of ownership did not pass to the customer until the product was received by the customer. In such cases, the revenues were deferred until customer receipt of the product shipped. Sales to authorized domestic distributors and original equipment manufacturers are made with certain rights of return and price protection provisions. Estimated reserves for future returns and pricing adjustments are established by the Company based on an analysis of historical patterns of returns and price protection claims as well as an analysis of authorized returns compared to received returns, current on-hand inventory at distributors, and distribution sales for the current period. Estimated reserves for future returns and price protection are charged against revenues in the same period as the corresponding sales are recorded. The Company offers rebates to authorized domestic and international distributors and authorized resellers. The rebates are incurred based on the level of sales to the respective distributors and resellers, and are charged to operations as a reduction in revenue in the same period as the corresponding sales. The Company, in general, warrants its products to be free from defects in material and workmanship under normal use and service for a period of one to five years from the date of receipt. The Company has the option to repair or replace products it deems defective due to material or workmanship. Estimated warranty costs are accrued in the period that the related revenue is recognized based upon an estimated average per unit repair or replacement cost applied to the estimated number of units under warranty. These estimates are based upon historical warranty incidence and are evaluated on an ongoing basis to ensure the adequacy of the warranty reserve. If actual return or replacement costs differ significantly from the Companys estimates, adjustments to recognize additional cost of sales may be required.
The Company also generates revenue from the sale of software licenses, fees associated with technical support, training and engineering services and royalties. Revenue from software maintenance obligations is deferred and recognized at the time the service is provided or over the life of the underlying service or support contract, if applicable. Unearned software maintenance and unearned nonrecurring engineering services revenue is included in deferred revenue on the balance sheet. Generally, the Company recognizes revenue under agreements for nonrecurring engineering services using the percentage-of-completion method of accounting based on the ratio of actual labor hours incurred to total estimated labor hours for individual contracts. However, the Company defers revenues from nonrecurring engineering services until delivery if, at the inception of the arrangement, there is uncertainty about delivery and/or the costs of delivery cannot be accurately estimated
The Companys software development tools and development boards often include multiple elements hardware, software, post contract customer support (PCS), limited training and basic hardware design review. The Companys customers purchase these products and services during their product development process in which they use the tools to build network connectivity into the devices they are manufacturing. The Company recognizes revenue related to these multiple element arrangements in accordance with Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2 Software Revenue Recognition, as amended by SOP 98-4, Deferral of the Effective Date of Certain Provisions of SOP 97-2. Revenue related to the sale of these
24
REVENUE RECOGNITION (CONTINUED)
development products is allocated to the various elements based on vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value as determined by the price charged for each element when sold separately.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts, which reflects the estimate of losses that may result from the inability of some of our customers to make required payments. The estimate for the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on known circumstances regarding collectibility of customer accounts and historical collections experience. If the financial condition of one or more of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.
INVENTORY
The Company reduces the carrying value of its inventories for estimated excess and obsolete inventories equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and its estimated realizable value based upon assumptions about future product demand and market conditions. If actual product demand or market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, additional inventory write-downs may be required.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Purchased proven technology, license agreements, covenants not to compete and other intangible assets are recorded at fair value when acquired in a business acquisition, or at cost when not purchased in a business combination. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the fair value of identifiable assets acquired and, effective October 1, 2002 is no longer amortized pursuant to FAS No. 142. However, goodwill is subject to an impairment assessment at least annually which may result in a charge to operations if the fair value of the reporting unit in which the goodwill is reported declines. Purchased in-process research and development costs (IPR&D) are expensed upon consummation of the related business acquisition. All other intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of four to ten years. Useful lives for intangible assets are estimated at the time of acquisition based on the periods of time from which the Company expects to derive benefits from the intangible assets. Methods of amortization reflect the pattern in which the asset is consumed.
Intangible assets are reviewed quarterly for impairment, or whenever events or circumstances indicate that the assets undiscounted expected future cash flows are not sufficient to recover the carrying value amount.
The Company measures impairment loss, if any, by comparing the fair market value, calculated as the present value of expected future cash flows, to its net book value or carrying amount. Impairment losses, if any, are recorded currently. To the extent that the Companys undiscounted future cash flows were to decline substantially, such an impairment charge could result.
The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment assessment for its NetSilicon and Inside Out Networks reporting units as of June 30, 2003. A discounted cash flow technique was utilized in
25
INTANGIBLE ASSETS (CONTINUED)
determining the fair value of each reporting unit. Since the calculated fair value of each reporting unit exceeded book value, there was no impairment identified. Goodwill of $3,854,462 remains on the Companys balance sheet as of June 30, 2003.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (FAS 109). The amount of deferred tax assets and liabilities actually realized could be impacted by differences in the timing or amount of future reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities or changes in the amounts of future taxable income. If management determines that it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized, a valuation allowance would be required, and would be reflected as income tax expense at that time.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth selected information derived from the Companys interim condensed consolidated statements of operations expressed as percentages of sales:
Three months | % | Nine months | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
ended | Increase | ended | Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30 | (decrease) | June 30 | (decrease) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
100.0 | 100.0 | (2.1 | )% | 100.0 | 100.0 | 0.2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
40.3 | 43.0 | (8.1 | ) | 40.2 | 45.7 | (11.8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
59.7 | 57.0 | 2.5 | 59.8 | 54.3 | 10.3 | |||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
24.1 | 28.4 | (16.8 | ) | 24.0 | 28.7 | (16.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
15.5 | 21.2 | (28.5 | ) | 15.4 | 18.4 | (16.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
15.5 | 19.6 | (22.4 | ) | 15.5 | 18.2 | (15.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Acquired in-process research and development |
| | | | 4.1 | (100.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Loss on sale of MiLAN assets |
| | | | 4.7 | (100.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring |
(0.6 | ) | | (100.0 | ) | (0.6 | ) | | (100.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
54.5 | 69.2 | (22.9 | ) | 54.3 | 74.1 | (26.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Gain from forgiveness of grant payable |
0.9 | 4.1 | (78.3 | ) | 0.4 | 1.4 | (72.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
6.1 | (8.1 | ) | 173.1 | 5.9 | (18.4 | ) | 132.0 | |||||||||||||||||
Other income, net |
0.7 | 1.8 | (61.2 | ) | 0.1 | 1.2 | (88.3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting change |
6.8 | (6.3 | ) | 206.2 | 6.0 | (17.2 | ) | 135.1 | |||||||||||||||||
Income tax provision (benefit) |
2.1 | (4.0 | ) | (150.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (6.2 | ) | (96.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before cumulative
effect of accounting change |
4.7 | (2.3 | ) | 306.3 | 6.2 | (11.0 | ) | 156.8 | |||||||||||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change |
| | | (57.2 | ) | | (100.0 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
4.7 | (2.3 | ) | 306.3 | % | (51.0 | ) | (11.0 | ) | (363.6 | )% | ||||||||||||||
The following events significantly impacted the Companys operations during the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002:
| In February 2002 the Company acquired NetSilicon, Inc., a provider of silicon-based embedded networking solutions for a purchase price of $67.2 million. The acquisition resulted in a new business segment called Device Networking Solutions. Sales from this segment were $8.1 million and $22.9 million during the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2003, respectively. |
26
| In March 2002, the Company sold the assets of its MiLAN Technology division for $8.1 million. | ||
| In September 2002, the Company implemented two restructuring plans resulting in workforce reductions of 88 employees worldwide. | ||
| In connection with the adoption of FAS 142 on October 1, 2002, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $43.9 million. The charge was recorded as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. | ||
| In March 2003, the Company reversed the valuation allowance associated with its German net operating loss carryforwards. The valuation allowance was reversed based upon current and anticipated future taxable income generated by the Companys German operations. The portion of the valuation allowance related to the German net operating loss carryforwards that are expected to be utilized by the Company during the year ended September 30, 2003 has been accounted for by reducing the effective income tax rate for the current year. The portion of the valuation allowance related to the German net operating loss carryforwards that are expected to be utilized by the Company during periods subsequent to September 30, 2003 has been accounted for as a discrete event and has resulted in an income tax benefit of $1.4 million being recorded during the three month period ended March 31, 2003. | ||
| During the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 the Company recognized $0.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, as a gain from forgiveness of an investment grant payable. In addition, for the nine months ended June 30, 2002, $0.5 million of related accrued interest payable was recorded as a component of other income. |
NET SALES
Net sales for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003, were $25.6 million and $76.6 million compared to net sales of $26.1 million and $76.4 million for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002. Net sales decreased by $0.5 million, or 2.0%, and increased by $0.2 million, or 0.2%, in the three and nine-month periods ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same periods in the prior fiscal year. The Companys pricing is generally inelastic. The changes in net sales are primarily a result of volume fluctuations, in addition to customer and product mix changes.
The following tables set forth revenue by segment, for the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2003 and June 30, 2002, expressed in thousands of dollars and as a percentage of net sales:
Three months ended | Three months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Connectivity Solutions |
$ | 17,481 | 68.4 | % | $ | 19,363 | 74.2 | % | ||||||||
Device Networking Solutions |
8,086 | 31.6 | % | 6,747 | 25.8 | % | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 25,567 | 100.0 | % | $ | 26,110 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Nine months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2003 | June 30, 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Connectivity Solutions |
$ | 53,730 | 70.1 | % | $ | 65,130 | 85.2 | % | ||||||||
Device Networking Solutions |
22,877 | 29.9 | % | 11,323 | 14.8 | % | ||||||||||
Total |
$ | 76,607 | 100.0 | % | $ | 76,453 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Connectivity Solutions net sales decreased $1.9 million and $11.4 million in the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2003 compared to the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2002. Net sales
27
NET SALES (CONTINUED)
by MiLAN, which the Company sold on March 25, 2002, were $5.8 million in the nine-month period ended June 30, 2002. In addition to the impact of the general slow down in the economy, certain of the Connectivity Solution products are positioned in mature markets that are declining. Although these markets are declining, the Companys Connectivity Solution products have maintained or increased their market share.
Net sales generated by the Device Networking segment were $8.1 million and $22.9 million in the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2003, compared to $6.7 million and $11.3 million in the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2002. The increase in net sales is primarily the result of the timing of the February 2002 acquisition of NetSilicon and a continued increase in the net sales of the Companys Device Server product line.
GROSS MARGIN
Gross margin for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003 was 59.7% and 59.8%, compared to 57.0% and 54.3% for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2002. Consolidation of the Companys manufacturing operations has improved operating efficiencies. In addition, material cost savings have also contributed to the increase in gross margin. The acquisition of NetSilicon and sale of the MiLAN division contributed to the increase in gross margin because NetSilicon products have a higher gross margin than LAN connectivity products that were sold by MiLAN. In the three and nine month periods ended June 30, 2002, one-time acquisition-related costs of $0.2 million and $0.6 million , respectively, for NetSilicon contributed to lower gross margins.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2003 decreased $4.1 million, or 22.9%, compared to operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2002. Total operating expenses decreased by $1.7 million due to compensation related savings realized from the restructuring plan executed in Minneapolis, Europe and NetSilicon in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. Additionally, operating expenses decreased by $1.7 million due to continuing cost containment measures, largely related to tighter spending guidelines implemented by the Company related to discretionary spending. As a result of the adoption of FAS 142 on October 1, 2002 the Company ceased the amortization of goodwill, resulting in a decrease in amortization expense of $0.5 million. The Company also recorded a change in estimate related to the September 2002 Digi Restructuring Plan, resulting in a decrease in operating expenses of $0.2 million. This change in estimate resulted primarily from settlements of certain previously established severance obligations and related legal fees.
Sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2003, were $6.2 million, or 24.1% of net sales, compared to $7.4 million, or 28.4% of net sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2002. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $0.5 million due to compensation related savings realized as a result of the restructuring plan executed in Minneapolis, Europe and NetSilicon in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. Sales and marketing expense decreased $0.7 million primarily as a result of continuing general cost containment measures, primarily related to travel and customer entertainment costs.
Research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2003 were $4.0 million, or 15.5% of net sales, compared to $5.5 million, or 21.2% of net sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2002. The Company continued to focus its research and development activities in the third quarter of fiscal 2003
28
OPERATING EXPENSES (CONTINUED)
on the development of its device networking business, which includes the device server and NetSilicon product lines. Compensation related savings of $0.9 million were realized as a result of the restructuring plan executed in Minneapolis, Europe and NetSilicon in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. Additional research and development cost reductions of $0.6 million were realized as a result of continuing general cost containment measures.
General and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2003, were $4.0 million, or 15.5% of net sales, compared to $5.1 million, or 19.6% of net sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2002. Compensation related savings of $0.3 million were realized as a result of the restructuring plan executed in Minneapolis, Europe and NetSilicon in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. As a result of the adoption of FAS 142 on October 1, 2002, the Company ceased the amortization of goodwill, resulting in a decrease in goodwill amortization expense of $0.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2003 relative to the third quarter of fiscal 2002. Also contributing to the reduction in general and administrative expenses was savings of $0.3 million realized primarily as a result of continuing general cost containment measures, primarily related to legal fees.
Operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 decreased $15.1 million, or 26.6%, compared to operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2002. Included in operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2002 was a loss on sale of the MiLAN division of $3.6 million in March 2002 and a charge for in-process research and development costs of $3.1 million in connection with the acquisition of NetSilicon in February 2002. As a result of the acquisition of NetSilicon on February 13, 2002, operating expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 include NetSilicon expenses for an entire nine month period, compared to four and one-half months for the nine months ended June 30, 2002 resulting in incremental operating expenses of $5.6 million that were partially offset by decreased operating expenses of $4.9 million as a result of the sale of MiLAN in March 2002. Total operating expenses decreased by $5.1 million due to compensation related savings realized from the restructuring plan executed in Minneapolis, Europe and NetSilicon in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. Additionally, operating expenses declined by $3.2 million due to continuing general cost containment measures, largely related to tighter spending guidelines implemented by the Company related to discretionary spending. As a result of the adoption of FAS 142 on October 1, 2002 the Company ceased the amortization of goodwill, resulting in a decrease in amortization expense of $1.7 million, partially offset by additional amortization of identifiable intangible assets of $1.3 million primarily related to the recent acquisition of NetSilicon. The Company also recorded a change in estimate related to the restructuring charge recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, resulting in a decrease in operating expenses of $0.4 million. This change in estimate resulted primarily from the renegotiation and settlement of certain previously established severance obligations including related legal fees.
Sales and marketing expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2003, were $18.4 million, or 24.0% of net sales, compared to $21.9 million, or 28.7% of net sales, for the nine months ended June 30, 2002. Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $1.6 million due to compensation related savings realized from the restructuring plan executed in Minneapolis, Europe and NetSilicon in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. For the nine months ended June 30, 2003, incremental sales and marketing expenses of $3.0 million as a result of the NetSilicon acquisition were partially offset by a $2.5 million decrease in expense as a result of the sale of MiLAN. Sales and marketing expenses declined $1.2 million as a result of reduced advertising expenses and an additional $1.2 million in savings was realized primarily as a result of continuing general cost containment measures.
29
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
OPERATING EXPENSES (CONTINUED)
Research and development expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 were $11.8 million, or 15.4% of net sales, compared to $14.1 million, or 18.4% of net sales, for the nine months ended June 30, 2002. The Company focused its research and development activities in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 on the development of its device networking business, which includes the device server and NetSilicon product lines. Compensation related savings of $2.8 million were realized from the restructuring plan executed in Minneapolis, Europe and NetSilicon in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. For the nine months ended June 30, 2003, incremental research and development expense of $3.1 million resulting from the acquisition of NetSilicon was partially offset by a $1.8 million decrease in expense as a result of the sale of MiLAN. Additional research and development cost reductions of $0.8 million were realized primarily as a result of continuing general cost containment measures.
General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended June 30, 2003, were $11.8 million, or 15.5% of net sales, compared to $14.0 million, or 18.2% of net sales, for the nine months ended June 30, 2002. General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.7 million as a result of compensation related savings realized from the restructuring plan executed in Minneapolis, Europe and NetSilicon in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002. For the nine months ended June 30, 2003, general and administrative expense decreased $0.6 million as a result of the sale of MiLAN. As a result of the adoption of FAS 142 on October 1, 2002, the Company ceased the amortization of goodwill, resulting in a decrease in goodwill amortization expense of $1.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2003 relative to the comparable period in fiscal 2002, partially offset by additional amortization of identifiable intangible assets of $1.3 million primarily related to the recent acquisition of NetSilicon. Additional general and administrative cost reductions of $0.5 million were realized primarily as a result of continuing general cost containment measures.
GAIN FROM FORGIVENESS OF GRANT PAYABLE
In connection with the acquisition of ITK International, Inc. (ITK) in July 1998, the Company assumed a liability for an investment grant of $1,525,410 payable to the German government relating to construction of the ITK facility in Dortmund, Germany. The investment grant contained a provision that the grant would be forgiven if ITK retained a specified number of employees in the facility for a five-year period. Because ITK was not in compliance with the minimum employment requirements of the grant at the time of the acquisition or subsequent to the acquisition, the Company continued to reflect the grant payable as a liability and to accrue interest on the principal balance of the grant.
During 2000, the Company applied for a waiver of the employment provision in the investment grant, based on unforeseeable developments in the European market that resulted in a smaller workforce. The waiver of the investment grant payable was approved in May 2002 by the German government. Accordingly, the Company reversed a portion of the investment grant payable and the related accrued interest payable of $1,067,767 and $456,859, respectively. The principal portion of the forgiveness of the investment grant is recorded as a component of operating loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2002, and the reversal of the accrued interest payable is recorded as a component of other income. The Companys consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2002 still reflected an investment grant payable and accrued interest payable of $457,643 and $6,103, respectively.
30
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
GAIN FROM FORGIVENESS OF GRANT PAYABLE (CONTINUED)
During the nine months ended June 30, 2003, the Company reversed an additional $298,758 of the investment grant payable related to the portion of the grant payable that has been forgiven as a result of the Company remaining in the building through June 30, 2003. The principal portion of the forgiveness of the investment grant is recorded as a component of operating income in the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003. The Companys consolidated balance sheet at June 30, 2003 still reflects an investment grant payable and accrued interest payable of $158,885 and $6,103, respectively. The Company anticipates it will remain in the building through August 2003, at which time, these amounts will also be forgiven.
ACQUIRED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
On February 13, 2002, the Company acquired NetSilicon, Inc. (NetSilicon), a provider of silicon-based embedded networking solutions for a purchase price of $67.2 million. The transaction was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Included in the purchase price allocation was a $3.1 million charge to acquired in-process research and development. At the time of acquisition, NetSilicon had development projects in process including the Net + 20 microprocessor (subsequently renamed the 7520 microprocessor) and the Net + OS v. 5.0 software suite. The 7520 project involved the design and development of a low cost, high performance networking microprocessor. The Net + OS v. 5.0 project included significant and innovative advancements to the NetSilicon software platform in the areas of security, management and ease of use. The design, verification and other processes involved in the 7520 project required tools and skills that were new to NetSilicon. Similarly, the advanced and innovative features being developed for inclusion in the Net + OS v 5.0 software platform differed from existing Net + OS features.
Accordingly, the Company was uncertain whether the technology being developed could become commercially viable. If these products were not successfully developed, the sales and profitability of the Company would be adversely affected in future periods. Additionally, the value of other identifiable intangible assets and goodwill acquired could become impaired.
Management estimated that $3.1 million of the purchase price represented the fair value of purchased in-process research and development related to the 7520 chip and the Net + OS v. 5.0 software platform referred to above, that had not yet reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future uses. This amount was expensed as a nonrecurring, non-tax-deductible charge upon consummation of the acquisition.
The Company utilized the income valuation approach to determine the estimated fair value of the purchased in-process research and development. These estimates were based on the following assumptions:
| The estimated revenues were based upon NetSilicons estimate of revenue growth over the next four fiscal years from the revenue growth of primarily the Net + OS v. 5.0 and the 7520 chips. | ||
| The estimated gross margin was based upon historical gross margin for NetSilicons products, which include chips, boards, and development kits. Average gross margin was approximately 57.5%. | ||
| The estimated selling, general and administrative expenses were based on consideration of historical operating expenses as a percentage of sales and NetSilicons projected operating expenses. |
31
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
ACQUIRED IN-PROCESS RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED)
| Cost to complete each project was based on estimated remaining labor hours and a fully burdened labor cost, and other direct project expenses. | ||
| The discount rate used in the alternative income valuation approach was based on the weighted average cost of capital (WACC). The WACC calculation produces the average required rate of return of an investment in an operating enterprise, based on various required rates of return from investments in various areas of that enterprise. The discount rate used in the alternative valuation approach was 18.0%. Premiums were added to the WACC to account for the inherent risks in the development of the products, the risks of the products being completed on schedule, and the risk of the eventual sales of the product meeting the expectations of the Company. The following rates of return were used for the in-process research and development products: |
7520 | 35 | % | ||
Net + OS v. 5.0 | 30 | % |
The 7520 chip was released to production in January 2003. This chip is a derivative product capturing the price target and substantially all of the technology contemplated in the 7520 product family at the time of acquisition. The Company expects that revenue from the 7520 family may be less than originally projected at the time of the valuation, due primarily to current economic conditions. However, the Company anticipates that revenue from the product family will represent approximately the same percentage of total Company revenue as that originally projected.
Net + OS v. 5.0 was released to production in November 2002. The Company anticipates that the projected revenues for the Net + OS v. 5.0 will be in line with original projections. These estimates are subject to change, given the uncertainties of the development process, and no assurance can be given that deviations from these estimates will not occur.
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME
Other income, net was $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to other income, net of $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002. The Company realized interest income on short-term marketable securities and cash and cash equivalents of $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to lower average cash and marketable securities balances in the third quarter of 2003 compared to the third quarter of 2002. Interest expense on lines of credit and long-term debt was $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Other income was $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2003. Other income was $0.3 million for the three months ended June 20, 2002, primarily related to a $0.5 million reversal of accrued interest on the Dortmund investment grant payable resulting from forgiveness of a portion of the grant.
Other income, net was $0.1 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 compared to other income, net of $0.9 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2002. The Company realized interest income on short-term marketable securities and cash and cash equivalents of $0.7 million and $1.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The decrease was primarily due to lower average cash and marketable securities balances during the nine months ended June 30, 2003 as compared to the nine months ended June 30, 2002. Interest expense on lines of credit and long-term debt was $0.4 million
32
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME (CONTINUED)
and $0.3 million for the nine month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. Other expense was $0.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003. Other expense was flat for the nine months ended June 20, 2002 as the $0.5 million reversal of accrued interest on the Dortmund investment grant payable resulting from forgiveness of a portion of the grant, was offset by other expenses.
INCOME TAXES
In March 2003, the Company reversed the valuation allowance associated with its German net operating loss carryforwards. The valuation allowance was reversed based upon current and anticipated future taxable income generated by the Companys German operations. The portion of the valuation allowance related to the German net operating loss carryforwards that are expected to be utilized by the Company during the year ended September 30, 2003 has been accounted for by reducing the effective income tax rate for the current year. The portion of the valuation allowance related to the German net operating loss carryforwards that are expected to be utilized by the Company during periods subsequent to September 30, 2003 has been accounted for as a discrete event and resulted in an income tax benefit of $1.4 million being recorded during the three month period ended March 31, 2003.
Income taxes have been provided for at effective rates of 3.6% and 36.0% for the nine-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The effective rate for the nine month period ended June 30, 2003, adjusted for the $1.4 million income tax benefit related to the German net operating loss carryforwards that are expected to be utilized by the Company during periods subsequent to September 30, 2003, is 27.0%, compared to 36.0% for the nine month period ended June 30, 2002. The decrease in the effective rate is primarily due to foreign sourced income taxed at a lower rate than the U.S. statutory rate.
The Company is required to assess the realizability of its deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance against those assets in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109. Although realization of the associated deferred tax assets is not assured, the Company has concluded that it is more likely than not that remaining deferred tax assets will be realized based on future projected taxable income and the anticipated future reversal of deferred tax liabilities, and therefore no valuation allowance has been established at June 30, 2003. The amount of the net deferred tax assets realized, however, could vary if there are differences in the timing or amount of future reversals of existing deferred tax liabilities or changes in the amounts of future taxable income. If the Companys future taxable income tax projections are not realized, a valuation allowance would be required, and would be reflected as income tax expense at that time.
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141, Business Combinations (FAS 141), and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (FAS 142). FAS 141 eliminated the pooling-of-interests method of accounting for business combinations, requiring that all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 be accounted for using the purchase method. FAS 142 provides that goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized, but rather are reviewed for impairment at least annually and more frequently in certain circumstances using a two-step process. The first step is to identify a potential impairment and, in transition, this step must be measured as of the beginning of the fiscal year. The second step of the goodwill impairment test measures the amount of the impairment loss (measured as of the beginning of the
33
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE (CONTINUED)
year of adoption), if any, and must be completed by the end of the Companys fiscal year. In addition, FAS 142 expands the disclosure requirements about goodwill and other intangible assets in the years subsequent to their acquisition. The Company has adopted the provisions of FAS 142 as of October 1, 2002. However, the transition provisions of FAS 142 apply to the Companys accounting for the NetSilicon acquisition as this acquisition occurred after June 30, 2001.
In connection with the adoption of FAS 142, the Company engaged an appraiser to determine the fair value of the Company as of October 1, 2002 as part of the Companys adoption of FAS 142 effective that date. Based on this valuation, which utilized a discounted cash flow valuation technique using fair values indicated by both the income approach and the market approach, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $43,865,972 in the first quarter of fiscal 2003, attributable primarily to an impairment of the carrying value of goodwill related to the acquisition of NetSilicon and goodwill related to the Central Data Corporation and INXTECH acquisitions. The impairment resulted from significant changes in the Companys expected future cash flows that resulted from a decline in anticipated future revenues due both to the general downturn in the U.S. and worldwide economy and to a severe downturn in the networking and communications and semiconductor sectors of the technology industry. As a result of the downturn in expected future revenues and a substantial decline in the Companys market capitalization during 2002, the indicated fair values of the Companys reporting units had declined substantially since the acquisitions of NetSilicon, Central Data Corporation and INXTECH. The charge is reported as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle. There was no income tax effect associated with this impairment charge.
The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment assessment for its NetSilicon and Inside Out Networks reporting units as of June 30, 2003. A discounted cash flow technique was utilized in determining the fair value of each reporting unit. Since the calculated fair value of each reporting unit exceeded book value, there was no impairment identified. Goodwill of $3,854,462 remains on the Companys balance sheet as of June 30, 2003.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company has financed its operations principally with funds generated from operations. At June 30, 2003, the Company had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $54.5 million compared to $58.2 million at September 30, 2002. The Companys working capital decreased $3.2 million to $59.5 million at June 30, 2003 compared to $62.7 million at September 30, 2002.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $8.9 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003, compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $7.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2002. Changes in operating assets and liabilities used $2.7 million and provided $1.1 million of cash during the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. During the nine months ended June 30, 2003, the restructuring accrual decreased $1.9 million resulting from payments against the accrual. In addition, accounts receivable increased by $0.7 million, resulting primarily from the timing of sales relative to the end of the quarter. During the nine months ended June 30, 2002, inventories and accounts receivable
34
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
decreased $2.2 million and $4.3 million, respectively, due to inventory purchases and the timing of sales relative to the end of the quarter. In addition accounts payable declined $4.9 million due to the timing of payments made by the Company to its suppliers.
Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 was $14.2 million compared to $2.8 million during the same period one year ago. Net purchases of marketable securities were $11.1 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2003, compared to net sales of $3.1 million during the same period one year ago. The Company used $2.0 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2003 for contingent purchase price payments related to the Inside Out Networks and INXTECH acquisitions compared to $2.9 million during the same period one year ago. Proceeds from the sale of all assets of MiLAN provided $8.1 million of cash in March 2002. In February 2002, the Company used $10.4 million ($16.3 million net of cash acquired of $5.9 million) as a result of the acquisition of NetSilicon. Purchases of equipment, capital improvements and other assets were $1.1 million and $0.7 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company anticipates total fiscal 2003 expenditures for equipment, capital improvements and other assets to range from $1.1 million to $1.5 million.
The Company used $9.4 million in financing activities during the nine months ended June 30, 2003, compared to $0.4 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2002. During the nine months ended June 30, 2003, the Company used $8.6 million to repurchase 2,324,683 shares of its common stock from Sorrento Networks Corporation (Sorrento). Principal payments on long-term debt obligations were $1.3 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $1.4 million during the same period one year ago. Borrowings on the Companys line of credit were $0.5 million during the nine months ended June 30, 2002. Cash received from the exercise of employee stock options and employee stock purchase plan transactions was $0.5 million for both of the nine month periods ended June 30, 2003 and 2002. The Company does not currently anticipate additional stock repurchases during fiscal 2003.
The Companys management believes that current financial resources, cash generated from operations and the Companys potential capacity for additional debt and/or equity financing will be sufficient to fund current and future capital requirements.
The following summarizes the Companys contractual obligations at June 30, 2003, and the effect such obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flow in future periods. However, this table excludes up to $6.0 million of additional purchase consideration that may be payable to the former shareholders of Inside Out Networks in the event that, in the future, these operations achieve certain development and operating milestones.
35
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (CONTINUED)
Contractual Obligations
Payments due by fiscal period | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | Thereafter | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 776 | $ | 382 | $ | 382 | $ | 382 | $ | 382 | $ | 3,241 | $ | 5,545 | ||||||||||||||
Operating leases |
326 | 1,005 | 783 | 494 | 447 | | 3,055 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations |
$ | 1,102 | $ | 1,387 | $ | 1,165 | $ | 876 | $ | 829 | $ | 3,241 | $ | 8,600 | ||||||||||||||
The Company maintains a line of credit in Europe with Deutsche Bank. Available borrowing is determined by the amount maintained as collateral at a New York Deutsche Bank account, and was $1.25 million at June 30, 2003. This collateral is included in marketable securities at June 30, 2003. There were no outstanding borrowings on the line of credit as of June 30, 2003 or September 30, 2002.
Long-term debt consists of fixed rate, collateralized and uncollateralized notes bearing interest at rates ranging from 5.2% to 6.25%. Certain notes are collateralized by land, buildings and equipment with a carrying value of $5.7 million at June 30, 2003. All of the Companys long-term debt was incurred in connection with the construction of the Dortmund, Germany facility, which the Company is attempting to sell.
In June 2003, the Company paid the outstanding balance ($1.1 million) of the 5.2% fixed rate long term collateralized note that was originally payable in semi-annual installments through December 30, 2017. The Company is considering making additional principal payments prior to scheduled maturities if market conditions are deemed appropriate.
The lease obligations summarized above relate to various operating lease agreements for office space and equipment.
FOREIGN CURRENCY
For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2003, the Company had approximately $9.5 million and $26.8 million of net sales to foreign customers, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2003, $6.5 million was denominated in U.S. dollars, $2.8 million was denominated in Euros, and $0.2 million was denominated in Japanese Yen. For the nine months ended June 30, 2003, $17.8 million was denominated in U.S. dollars, $8.3 million was denominated in Euros, and $0.7 was denominated in Japanese Yen.
The Company continues to hold long-term debt in Dortmund, Germany (ITK), related to the facility in Dortmund. This debt balance, 4.8 million Euros at June 30, 2003, is subject to fluctuations as a result of Euro exchange rate changes.
36
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
INFLATION
Management believes inflation has not had a material effect on the Companys operations or on its financial position.
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities (FAS 146). This statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and the recognition of a liability for those related costs. The principal difference between FAS 146 and prior guidance relates to its requirements for recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity. FAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized and measured initially at fair value only when the liability is incurred. Under previous rules, a liability for an exit cost was recognized at the date of an entitys commitment to an exit plan. Generally, the provisions of FAS 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. The Company did not adopt FAS No. 146 early and the Company has undertaken no exit or disposal activities in the first nine months of fiscal 2003. Accordingly, adoption of this standard did not impact the Companys financial position or results of operations.
In December 2002, the FASB issued FAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition Disclosure an amendment of FAS 123 (FAS 148). This Statement amends FAS 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, this Statement amends the disclosure requirements of Statement 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The provisions of FAS 148 are effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002, and disclosure requirements are effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. The Company has no immediate plans to change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. The Company has made the additional stock based employee compensation disclosures required by FAS 148 beginning in the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. This interpretation elaborates on the disclosures required in financial statements concerning obligations under certain guarantees. It also clarifies the requirements related to the recognition of liabilities by a guarantor at the inception of certain guarantees. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of this interpretation for financial statements of interim or annual periods ending after December 15, 2002 and, accordingly, has made the additional disclosures beginning in the quarter ended March 31, 2003. The recognition provisions of this interpretation are effective for the Company for fiscal 2003 and are applicable only to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The Companys adoption of this interpretation did not have an impact on its financial position or results of operations.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which addresses accounting for special-purpose and variable interest entities. The Company is required to adopt the provisions of this interpretation for financial statements issued after December 31, 2002. The adoption of this interpretation did not have an impact on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
37
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS (CONTINUED)
In April 2003, the FASB issued FAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (FAS 149). This Statement amends and clarifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. The provisions of FAS 149 are effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships designated after June 30, 2003. The Company has reviewed the provisions of FAS 149 and determined that the Company does not currently have any derivative instruments or hedging activities to which FAS 149 applies. The Company will continue to monitor its activities and evaluate the applicability of FAS 149 on future transactions. The Company does not expect the adoption of this interpretation to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.
In May 2003, the FASB issued FAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity (FAS 150). This Statement establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. The provisions of FAS 150 are effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003, except for mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities. The statement is to be implemented by reporting the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle for financial instruments created before the issuance date of the statement and still existing at the beginning of the interim period of adoption. The Company has not completed its analysis of the effects of FAS 150, but does not expect the adoption to impact its financial position or results of operations.
RISK FACTORS
The Companys dependence on new product development and the rapid technological change that characterizes the Companys industry make it susceptible to loss of market share resulting from competitors product introductions and similar risks.
The data communications industry is characterized by rapidly changing technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions, short product life cycles and rapidly changing customer requirements. The introduction of products embodying new technologies and the emergence of new industry standards can render existing products obsolete and unmarketable. The Companys future success will depend on its ability to enhance its existing products, to introduce new products to meet changing customer requirements and emerging technologies, and to demonstrate the performance advantages and cost-effectiveness of its products over competing products. Any failure by the Company to modify its products to support new alternative technologies or any failure to achieve widespread customer acceptance of such modified products could cause the Company to lose market share and cause its revenues to decline. The Company may experience delays in developing and marketing product enhancements or new products that respond to technological change, evolving industry standards and changing customer requirements. There can be no assurance that the Company will not experience difficulties that could delay or prevent the successful development, introduction, and marketing of these products or product enhancements, or that its new products and product enhancements will adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace and achieve any significant or sustainable degree of market acceptance in existing or additional markets. Failure by the Company, for technological or other reasons, to develop and introduce new products and product enhancements in a timely and cost-effective manner could have a material adverse effect on the Company. In addition, the future introductions or announcements of products by the Company or one of
38
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
its competitors embodying new technologies or changes in industry standards or customer requirements could render the Companys then-existing products obsolete or unmarketable. There can be no assurance that the introduction or announcement of new product offerings by the Company or one or more of its competitors will not cause customers to defer the purchase of the Companys existing products, which could cause its revenues to decline.
The Company intends to continue to devote significant resources to its research and development, which, if not successful, could cause a decline in its revenues and harm its business.
The Company intends to continue to devote significant resources to research and development in the coming years to enhance and develop additional products. For the fiscal years ended 2002, 2001, and 2000, the Companys research and development expenses comprised 19.2%, 14.1%, and 15.2%, respectively, of total net sales. If the Company is unable to develop new products as a result of its research and development efforts, or if the products the Company develops are not successful, its business could be harmed. Even if the Company develops new products that are accepted by its target markets, the net revenues from these products may not be sufficient to justify its investment in research and development.
A substantial portion of the companys recent development efforts have been directed toward the development of new products targeted to manufacturers of intelligent, network-enabled devices and other embedded systems in various markets, including markets in which networking solutions for embedded systems have not historically been sold, such as markets for industrial automation equipment and security equipment. The Companys financial performance is dependent upon the development of the intelligent device markets that the Company is targeting, and the Companys ability to successfully compete and sell its products to manufacturers of these intelligent devices.
Certain of the Companys products that generate a substantial amount of its revenue are sold into mature markets, which could limit the Companys ability to generate revenue from these products.
Certain of the Companys products provide asynchronous and synchronous data transmissions via add-on cards. The market for add-on asynchronous and synchronous data communications cards is a mature market. Furthermore, certain applications of the Companys embedded network interface cards are also considered mature. Asynchronous, synchronous, and network interface cards currently generate about one-half of the Companys revenues. As the overall market for these products decreases due to the adoption of new technologies, the Company expects that its revenues from these products will continue to decline. As a result, the Companys future prospects depend in large part on its ability to develop or acquire and successfully market additional products that address growth markets.
The Companys failure to effectively manage product transitions could have a material adverse effect on the Companys revenues and profitability.
From time to time, the Company or its competitors may announce new products, capabilities, or technologies that may replace or shorten the life cycles of the Companys existing products. Announcements of currently planned or other new products may cause customers to defer or stop purchasing the Companys products until new products become available. Furthermore, the introduction of new or enhanced products requires the Company to manage the transition from older product inventories and ensure that adequate supplies of new products can be delivered to meet customer demand. The
39
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
Companys failure to effectively manage transitions from older products could have a material adverse effect on the Companys revenues and profitability.
The Companys failure to compete successfully in its highly competitive market could result in reduced prices and loss of market share.
The market in which the Company operates is characterized by rapid technological advances and evolving industry standards. The market can be significantly affected by new product introductions and marketing activities of industry participants. The Company competes for customers on the basis of product performance in relation to compatibility, support, quality and reliability, product development capabilities, price, and availability. Certain of the Companys competitors and potential competitors may have greater financial, technological, manufacturing, marketing, and personnel resources than the Company. Present and future competitors may be able to identify new markets and develop products more quickly, which are superior to those developed by the Company. They may also adapt new technologies faster, devote greater resources to research and development, promote products more aggressively, and price products more competitively than the Company. There are no assurances that competition will not intensify or that the Company will be able to compete effectively in the markets in which the Company competes.
The Companys concentrated customer base increases the potential adverse effect on the Company from the loss of one or more customers.
The Companys products have historically been sold into highly concentrated customer markets. Two customers comprised more than 10% each of net sales each during the fiscal years ended 2002, 2001, and 2000: Tech Data at 14.0%, 13.9%, and 13.4%, respectively, and Ingram Micro at 13.8%, 11.3%, and 10.0%, respectively. The Companys sales are primarily made on the basis of purchase orders rather than under long-term agreements, and therefore, any customer could cease purchasing the Companys products at any time without penalty. The decision of any key customer to cease using the Companys products or a material decline in the number of units purchased by a significant customer could have a material adverse effect on the Companys revenues.
The long and variable sales cycle for certain of the Companys products makes it more difficult for the Company to predict its operating results and manage its business.
The sale of the Companys products typically involves a significant technical evaluation and commitment of capital and other resources by potential customers and end users, as well as delays frequently associated with end users internal procedures to deploy new technologies within their products and to test and accept new technologies. For these and other reasons, the sales cycle associated with certain of the Companys products is typically lengthy and is subject to a number of significant risks, including end users internal purchasing reviews, that are beyond the Companys control. Because of the lengthy sales cycle and the large size of customer orders, if orders forecasted for a specific customer for a particular quarter are not realized in that quarter, the Companys operating results for that quarter could be materially adversely affected.
40
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
The Company depends on manufacturing relationships and on limited-source suppliers, and any disruptions in these relationships may cause damage to the Companys customer relationships.
The Company procures all parts and certain services involved in the production of its products, and subcontracts most of its product manufacturing to outside firms that specialize in such services. Although most of the components of the Companys products are available from multiple vendors, the Company has several single-source supplier relationships, either because alternative sources are not available or because the relationship is advantageous to the Company. There can be no assurance that the Companys suppliers will be able to meet the Companys future requirements for products and components in a timely fashion. In addition, the availability of many of these components to the Company is dependent in part on the Companys ability to provide its suppliers with accurate forecasts of its future requirements. Delays or lost sales could be caused by other factors beyond the Companys control, including late deliveries by vendors of components. If the Company is required to identify alternative suppliers for any of its required components, qualification and pre-production periods could be lengthy and may cause an increase in component costs and delays in providing products to customers. Any extended interruption in the supply of any of the key components currently obtained from limited sources could disrupt the Companys operations and have a material adverse effect on the Companys customer relationships and profitability.
The Companys use of suppliers in Southeast Asia involves risks that could negatively impact the Company.
The Company uses suppliers in Southeast Asia. Product delivery times may be extended due to the distances involved, requiring more lead-time in ordering. In addition, ocean freight delays may occur as a result of labor problems, weather delays or expediting and customs issues. Any extended delay in receipt of the component parts could eliminate anticipated costs savings and have a material adverse effect on the Companys customer relationships and profitability.
The Companys ability to compete could be jeopardized if the Company is unable to protect its intellectual property rights.
The Companys ability to compete depends in part on its proprietary rights and technology. Although the Company has certain patents and patent applications and may seek additional patents where appropriate for proprietary technology, the Companys proprietary technology and products are generally not patented. The Company relies primarily on the copyright, trademark, and trade secret laws to protect its proprietary rights in its products.
The Company generally enters into confidentiality agreements with its employees, and sometimes with its customers and potential customers, and limits access to the distribution of its proprietary information. There can be no assurance that the steps taken by the Company in this regard will be adequate to prevent the misappropriation of its technology. The Companys pending patent applications may be denied and any patents, once issued, may be circumvented by the Companys competitors. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that others will not develop technologies that are superior to the Companys technologies. Despite the Companys efforts to protect its proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of its products or to obtain and use information that the Company regards as proprietary. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect the Companys proprietary rights as fully as do the laws of the United States. There can be no assurance that the Companys means of protecting its
41
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
proprietary rights in the United States or abroad will be adequate or that competing companies will not independently develop similar technology. The Companys failure to adequately protect its proprietary rights could have a material adverse effect on the Companys competitive position and result in loss of revenue.
From time to time, the Company is subject to claims and litigation regarding intellectual property rights, which could seriously harm the Company and require the Company to incur significant costs.
The data communications industry is characterized by frequent litigation regarding patent and other intellectual property rights. From time to time, the Company receives notification of a third-party claim that its products infringe other intellectual property rights. Any litigation to determine the validity of third-party infringement claims, whether or not determined in the Companys favor or settled by the Company, may be costly and divert the efforts and attention of the Companys management and technical personnel from productive tasks, which could have a material adverse effect on the Companys ability to operate its business and service the needs of its customers. There can be no assurance that any infringement claims by third parties, if proven to have merit, will not materially adversely affect the Companys business or financial condition. In the event of an adverse ruling in any such matter, the Company may be required to pay substantial damages, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, discontinue the use of certain processes or be required to obtain a license under the intellectual property rights of the third party claiming infringement. There can be no assurance that a license would be available on reasonable terms or at all. Any limitations on the Companys ability to market its products, or delays and costs associated with redesigning its products or payments of license fees to third parties, or any failure by the Company to develop or license a substitute technology on commercially reasonable terms could have a material adverse effect on its business and financial condition.
The Company faces risks associated with its international operations and expansion that could impair its ability to grow its revenues abroad.
In the fiscal years ended September 30, 2002, 2001, and 2000, net sales to customers outside the United States, primarily in Europe, were approximately 31.4%, 33.0%, and 34.8%, respectively, of total net sales. The Company believes that its future growth is dependent in part upon its ability to increase sales in international markets. These sales are subject to a variety of risks, including fluctuations in currency exchange rates, tariffs, import restrictions and other trade barriers, unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, longer accounts receivable payment cycles and potentially adverse tax consequences, and export license requirements. In addition, the Company is subject to the risks inherent in conducting business internationally, including political and economic instability and unexpected changes in diplomatic and trade relationships. There can be no assurance that one or more of these factors will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys business strategy and financial condition.
If the Company loses key personnel it could prevent the Company from executing its business strategy.
The Companys business and prospects depend to a significant degree upon the continuing contributions of its executive officers and its key technical personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there
42
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION (CONTINUED) |
RISK FACTORS (CONTINUED)
can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in attracting and retaining qualified personnel. Failure to attract and retain key personnel could result in the Companys failure to execute its business strategy.
Any acquisitions the Company has made or will make could disrupt its business and seriously harm its financial condition.
The Company will continue to consider acquisitions of complementary businesses, products or technologies. In the event of any future purchases, the Company could:
| issue stock that would dilute the Companys current stockholders percentage ownership; | |
| incur debt; | |
| assume liabilities; or | |
| incur large and immediate write-offs. |
The Companys operation of any acquired business will also involve numerous risks, including:
| problems combining the purchased operations, technologies, or products; | |
| unanticipated costs; | |
| diversion of managements attention from the Companys core business; | |
| difficulties integrating businesses in different countries and cultures; | |
| adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers; | |
| risks associated with entering markets in which the Company has no or limited prior experience; and | |
| potential loss of key employees, particularly those of the purchased organization. |
The Company cannot assure that it will be able to successfully integrate any businesses, products, technologies, or personnel that the Company has acquired or that the Company might acquire in the future and any failure to do so could disrupt its business and have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, from time to time the Company may enter into negotiations for a proposed acquisition, but be unable or unwilling to consummate the acquisition under consideration. This could cause significant diversion of managements attention and out-of-pocket expenses to the Company. The Company could also be exposed to litigation as a result of an unconsummated acquisition, including claims that it failed to negotiate in good faith or misappropriated confidential information.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company does not have material exposure to market risk from market sensitive financial instruments other than the currency risk associated with certain transactions being denominated in Euros.
The Company has some exposure to credit risk related to its accounts receivable portfolio. Exposure to credit risk is controlled through continuous monitoring procedures, credit limits and collaboration with sales management on customer contacts to facilitate payment.
43
ITEM 4. DISCLSOURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)). Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. There was no change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the Companys most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The material set forth in Note 16 of Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES
None
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) | Exhibits: |
Exhibit No. | Description | |
3(a) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as Amended (1) | |
3(b) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company (2) | |
4(a) | Form of Rights Agreement, dated as of June 10, 1998 between Digi International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association (formerly known as Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association), as Rights Agent (3) |
44
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K (CONTINUED)
4(b) | Amendment dated January 26, 1999, to Share Rights Agreement, dated as of June 10, 1998 between Digi International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association (formerly known as Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association), as Rights Agent (4) | |
31(a) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer | |
31(b) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer | |
32 | Section 1350 Certification |
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K: | |
Form 8-K, dated April 16, 2003, announcing the Companys financial results for its second fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003. |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1993 (File No. 0-17972) | |
(2) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2001 (File No. 0-17972) | |
(3) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated June 24, 1998 (File No. 0-17972) | |
(4) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Amendment 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated February 5, 1999 (File No. 0-17972) |
45
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DIGI INTERNATIONAL INC. | ||||
Date: August 12, 2003 | By: | /s/ Subramanian. Krishnan | ||
Subramanian Krishnan | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(duly authorized officer and | ||||
Principal Financial Officer) |
46
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number | Document Description | Form of Filing | ||||
3(a) | Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant, as Amended (incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit number to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1993 (File No. 0-17972)) | Incorporated by Reference | ||||
3(b) | Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to the corresponding exhibit number to the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2001 (File No. 0-17972)) | Incorporated by Reference | ||||
4(a) | Form of Rights Agreement, dated as of June 10, 1998 between Digi International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association (formerly known as Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association), as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated June 24, 1998 (File No. 0-17972)) | Incorporated by Reference | ||||
4(b) | Amendment dated January 26, 1999, to Share Rights Agreement, dated June 10, 1998 between Digi International Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association (formerly known as Norwest Bank Minnesota, National Association), as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Amendment No. 1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form 8-A dated February 5, 1999 (File No. 0-17972)) | Incorporated by Reference | ||||
31(a) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer | Filed Electronically | ||||
31(b) | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer | Filed Electronically | ||||
32 | Section 1350 Certification | Filed Electronically |
47