Back to GetFilings.com



Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

     
(X)   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
         For the quarterly period ended June 28, 2003

OR

     
(  )   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
         For the transition period from ____________________ to __________

Commission File Number  0-15386

CERNER CORPORATION


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Delaware

  43-1196944

(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
  (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)

2800 Rockcreek Parkway
North Kansas City, Missouri 64117
(816) 201-1024


(Address of Principal Executive Offices, including zip code;
registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

          Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) with the Commission, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes (X)    No (  )

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes (X)    No (  )

          There were 35,305,317 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value, outstanding at June 28, 2003.

 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

Part I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Part II. Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
EX-10(a) Enhanced Severance Pay Plan
EX-32.1 Certification Pursuant to Section 906
EX-32.2 Certification Pursuant to Section 906


Table of Contents

CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

I N D E X

         
Part I.   Financial Information:    
Item 1.   Financial Statements:    
    Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 28, 2003 (unaudited) and December 28, 2002   1
   
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the three and six months ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002 (unaudited)
  2
   
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002 (unaudited)
  3
    Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements   4
Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations   9
Item 3.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk   19
Item 4.   Controls and Procedures   19
Part II.   Other Information:   19
Item 1.   Legal Proceedings   19
Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders   19
Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K   20

 


Table of Contents

Part I.   Financial Information
Item 1.
  Financial Statements

CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

                     
        June 28,   December 28,
        2003   2002
       
 
(In thousands)   (unaudited)        
Assets
               
 
Current Assets:
               
 
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 121,038     $ 142,543  
 
Receivables
    255,635       272,668  
 
Inventory
    8,551       9,041  
 
Prepaid expenses and other
    25,961       23,434  
 
 
   
     
 
 
Total current assets
    411,185       447,686  
 
Property and equipment, net
    155,367       134,283  
 
Software development costs, net
    128,644       117,327  
 
Goodwill, net
    47,146       45,938  
 
Intangible assets, net
    20,508       23,155  
 
Investments, net
    1,096       964  
 
Other assets
    9,370       9,926  
 
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 773,316     $ 779,279  
 
 
   
     
 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
               
 
Current Liabilities:
               
 
Accounts payable
  $ 32,361     $ 46,822  
 
Current installments of long-term debt
    12,008       12,202  
 
Deferred revenue
    54,623       45,055  
 
Income taxes
    5,690       4,691  
 
Accrued payroll and tax withholdings
    39,723       47,262  
 
Other accrued expenses
    11,523       9,519  
 
 
   
     
 
 
Total current liabilities
    155,928       165,551  
 
Long-term debt
    123,901       136,636  
 
Deferred income taxes
    39,882       35,848  
 
Stockholders’ Equity:
               
 
Common stock, $.01 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized, 36,808,316 shares issued at June 28, 2003 and 36,732,532 issued in 2002
    368       367  
 
Additional paid-in capital
    228,033       226,912  
 
Retained earnings
    251,108       236,572  
 
Treasury stock, at cost (1,502,999 and 1,202,999 shares in 2003 and 2002, respectively)
    (26,793 )     (20,863 )
 
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
               
   
Foreign currency translation adjustment
    851       (1,668 )
   
Unrealized gain/(loss) on available-for-sale equity securities (net of deferred tax liability of $22 for 2003 and deferred tax asset of $23 in 2002)
    38       (76 )
 
 
   
     
 
   
Total stockholders’ equity
    453,605       441,244  
 
 
   
     
 
 
  $ 773,316     $ 779,279  
 
 
   
     
 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

1


Table of Contents

CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(UNAUDITED)

                                   
      Three Months Ended   Six Months Ended
     
 
      June 28,   June 29,   June 28,   June 29,
     
 
 
 
      2003   2002   2003   2002
     
 
 
 
(In thousands, except per share data)                                
Revenues:
                               
 
System sales
  $ 82,742     $ 75,291     $ 161,336     $ 154,535  
 
Support, maintenance and services
    116,240       105,282       229,172       201,318  
 
Reimbursed travel
    8,713       6,251       15,378       12,393  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
Total revenues
    207,695       186,824       405,886       368,246  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Costs and expenses:
                               
 
Cost of revenues
    53,096       45,245       101,348       91,831  
 
Sales and client service
    86,646       76,837       174,737       151,255  
 
Software development
    38,457       31,569       75,915       61,262  
 
General and administrative
    13,149       12,300       26,291       24,342  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
Total costs and expenses
    191,348       165,951       378,291       328,690  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Operating earnings
    16,347       20,873       27,595       39,556  
Other income (expense):
                               
 
Interest expense, net
    (1,603 )     (1,373 )     (3,449 )     (2,896 )
 
Other income
    127       20       143       31  
 
Gain on sale of investment
          4,308             4,308  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
 
Total
    (1,476 )     2,955       (3,306 )     1,443  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Earnings before income taxes and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
    14,871       23,828       24,289       40,999  
Income taxes
    (5,928 )     (9,136 )     (9,753 )     (15,903 )
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Earnings before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
    8,943       14,692       14,536       25,096  
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting for goodwill, net of $486 income tax benefit
                      786  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Net earnings
    8,943       14,692       14,536       24,310  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Basic earnings per share:
                               
Earnings before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
  $ .25     $ .41     $ .41     $ .73  
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting for goodwill
                      (.02 )
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Net earnings per share
  $ .25     $ .41     $ .41     $ .71  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
    35,395       35,442       35,476       34,410  
Diluted earnings per share:
                               
Earnings before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
  $ .25     $ .39     $ .40     $ .67  
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting for goodwill
                      (.02 )
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Net earnings per share
  $ .25       .39     $ .40       .65  
 
 
   
     
     
     
 
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
    35,731       37,478       36,215       37,360  

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2


Table of Contents

CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)

                       
          Six Months Ended
          June 28, 2003   June 29, 2002
         
 
(In thousands)                
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
 
Net earnings
  $ 14,536     $ 24,310  
 
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
   
Depreciation and amortization
    32,966       27,168  
   
Goodwill impairment
          1,272  
   
Gain on sale of investment
          (4,308 )
   
Non-employee stock option compensation expense
    23       34  
     
Provision for deferred income taxes
    4,215       (29,627 )
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
               
   
Receivables, net
    17,033       (28,817 )
   
Inventory
    490       (1,406 )
   
Prepaid expenses and other
    (1,759 )     (4,400 )
   
Accounts payable
    (13,853 )     4,895  
   
Accrued income taxes
    851       35,413  
   
Deferred revenue
    9,568       (12,641 )
   
Other accrued liabilities
    (5,535 )     (3,443 )
 
 
   
     
 
 
Total adjustments
    43,999       (15,860 )
 
 
   
     
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
    58,535       8,450  
 
 
   
     
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
   
Purchase of capital equipment
    (11,344 )     (21,493 )
   
Purchase of land, buildings and improvements
    (22,586 )     (5,484 )
   
Acquisition of business
          (13,429 )
   
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities
          90,119  
   
Repayment of notes receivable
    215        
   
Capitalized software development costs
    (28,749 )     (22,915 )
 
 
   
     
 
 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (62,464 )     26,798  
 
 
   
     
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
   
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
          10,086  
   
Repayment of long-term debt
    (14,015 )     (12,019 )
   
Purchase of treasury stock
    (5,930 )      
   
Proceeds from exercise of options
    1,347       2,170  
   
Associate stock purchase plan discounts
    (248 )     (345 )
 
 
   
     
 
 
Net cash used in financing activities
    (18,846 )     (108 )
 
 
   
     
 
 
Foreign currency translation adjustment
    1,270       710  
 
 
   
     
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (21,505 )     35,850  
 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
    142,543       107,536  
 
 
   
     
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 121,038     $ 143,386  
 
 
   
     
 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

CERNER CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)      Interim Statement Presentation & Accounting Policies

The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K.

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position, and the results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of the three and six-month periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the entire year. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income,” establishes requirements for reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components. For the six months ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, total Comprehensive Income, which includes net earnings, foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale equity security adjustments, amounted to $17,169,000 and $13,004,000, respectively.

The Company incurs out-of-pocket expenses in connection with its client service activities, which are reimbursed by its clients. The amounts of “out-of-pocket” expenses, which are included in the cost of revenues in the accompanying Statement of Earnings, and equal amounts of related reimbursements were $8,713,000 and $6,251,000 for the three months and $15,378,000 and $12,393,000 for the six months ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, respectively.

The terms of the Company’s software license agreements with its clients generally provide for a limited indemnification of such intellectual property against losses, expenses and liabilities arising from third-party claims based on alleged infringement by the Company’s solutions of an intellectual property right of such third party. The terms of such indemnification often limit the scope of and remedies for such indemnification obligations and generally include a right to replace or modify an infringing solution. To date, the Company has not had to reimburse any of its clients for any losses related to these indemnification provisions pertaining to third-party intellectual property infringement claims. For several reasons, including the lack of prior indemnification claims and the lack of a monetary liability limit for certain infringement cases under the terms of the corresponding agreements with its clients, the Company cannot determine the maximum amount of potential future payments, if any, related to such indemnification provisions.

(2)      Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in the earnings of the Company. A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted per-share computations is as follows:

4


Table of Contents

                                                 
    Three months ended   Three months ended
    June 28, 2003   June 29, 2002
   
 
    Earnings   Shares   Per-Share   Earnings   Shares   Per-Share
    (Numerator)   (Denominator)   Amount   (Numerator)   (Denominator)   Amount
   
 
 
 
 
 
(In thousands, except per share data)                                                
Basic earnings per share
                                               
Income available to common stockholders
  $ 8,943       35,395     $ .25     $ 14,692       35,442     $ .41  
Effect of dilutive securities Stock options
          336                     2,036          
Diluted earnings per share
                                               
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income available to Common stockholders including assumed conversions
  $ 8,943       35,731     $ .25     $ 14,692       37,478     $ .39  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 

Options to purchase 5,489,000 and 546,000 shares of common stock at per share prices ranging from $21.50 to $574.82 and $51.70 to $574.82 were outstanding at the three-months ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the period.

                                                 
    Six months ended   Six months ended
    June 28, 2003   June 29, 2002
   
 
    Earnings   Shares   Per-Share   Earnings   Shares   Per-Share
    (Numerator)   (Denominator)   Amount   (Numerator)   (Denominator)   Amount
   
 
 
 
 
 
(In thousands, except per share data)                                                
Earnings per share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle
                                               
Basic earnings per share
                                               
Income available to common stockholders
  $ 14,536       35,476     $ .41     $ 25,096       34,410     $ .73  
Effect of dilutive securities Stock options
          739                     2,950          
Diluted earnings per share
                                               
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income available to Common stockholders including assumed conversions
  $ 14,536       36,215     $ .40     $ 25,096       37,360     $ .67  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
Net earnings per share
                                               
Basic earnings per share
                                               
Income available to common stockholders
  $ 14,536       35,476     $ .41     $ 24,310       34,410     $ .71  
Effect of dilutive securities Stock options
          739                     2,950          
Diluted earnings per share
                                               
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 
Income available to common stockholders including assumed conversions
  $ 14,536       36,215     $ .40     $ 24,310       37,360     $ .65  
 
   
     
     
     
     
     
 

Options to purchase 3,898,000 and 704,000 shares of common stock at per share prices ranging from $27.92 to $574.82 and $49.63 to $574.82 were outstanding at the three-months ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the options’ exercise price was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the period.

5


Table of Contents

(3)      Business Acquisitions

On April 30, 2002, the Company purchased Zynx Health, Incorporated (Zynx) for $15 million in cash and $8.5 million in software credits. The Company will not recognize revenues related to the utilization of these software credits as the Company considered the exchange of software credits for Zynx content as an exchange of similar productive assets, which will be accounted for at book value. In the event the software credits are not utilized over the next five years, the Company will make additional cash payments of up to $7.5 million depending on the level of the credits used. Those additional payments, if made, will result in additional goodwill. Zynx is widely recognized for advancing evidence-based medicine through solutions and services that deliver the latest scientific knowledge and best practices. Cerner intends to integrate the evidence-based content from Zynx into the Cerner Millennium ™ technology platform. The allocation of the purchase price to the estimated fair values of the identified tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, resulted in goodwill of $10.7 million and $3.3 million in intangible assets that will be amortized over five years.

(4)      Accounting for Stock Options

The Company applies the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44, “Accounting for Certain Transactions involving Stock Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25,” issued in March 2000, to account for its fixed-plan stock options. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair-value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As allowed by SFAS No. 123, the Company has elected to continue to apply the intrinsic-value-based method of accounting described above, and has adopted only the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123. The following is a reconciliation of reported net earnings to adjusted net earnings had the Company recorded compensation expense based on the fair value at the grant date for its stock options under SFAS 123 for the three and six months ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002.

                                 
    Three months ended   Six months ended
   
 
    June 28,   June 29,   June 28,   June 29,
    2003   2002   2003   2002
   
 
 
 
(In thousands, except per share data)                                
Reported net earnings
  $ 8,943       14,692       14,536       24,310  
Less: stock-based compensation expense determined under fair-value-based method for all awards
    (2,871 )     (4,755 )     (6,376 )     (8,531 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
Pro-forma net earnings
    6,072       9,937       8,160       15,779  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Basic earnings per share:
                               
Reported net earnings
  $ .25       .41       .41       .71  
Less: stock-based compensation expense determined under fair-value-based method for all awards, net of tax
    (.08 )     (.13 )     (.18 )     (.25 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
Pro-forma net earnings
    .17       .28       .23       .46  
 
   
     
     
     
 
Diluted earnings per share:
                               
Reported net earnings
  $ .25       .39       .40       .65  
Less: stock-based compensation expense determined under fair-value-based method for all awards
    (.08 )     (.13 )     (.18 )     (.23 )
 
   
     
     
     
 
Pro-forma net earnings
    .17       .26       .22       .42  
 
   
     
     
     
 

Pro forma net earnings reflect only options granted since January 1, 1995. Therefore, the full impact of calculating compensation expense for stock options under FAS 123 is not reflected in the adjusted net earnings amounts presented above, because compensation cost is reflected over the options’ vesting period of ten years for these options. Compensation expense for options granted prior to January 1, 1995 is not considered.

6


Table of Contents

(5)      Investments

In the second quarter of 2002, the Company sold its remaining 14,820,527 shares of WebMD for $90,119,000. Accordingly, the Company recorded an investment gain of $2,736,000, net of $1,572,000 in tax, as a result of the sale.

(6)      Receivables

Receivables consist of accounts receivable and contracts receivable. Accounts receivable represent recorded revenues that have been billed. Contracts receivable represent recorded revenues that are billable by the Company at future dates under the terms of a contract with a client. Billings and other consideration received on contracts in excess of related revenues recognized under the percentage-of — completion method are recorded as deferred revenue. A summary of receivables is as follows:

                 
    June 28,   December 28,
    2003   2002
(In thousands)  
 
Accounts receivable
  $ 174,937       188,614  
Contracts receivable
    80,698       84,054  
 
   
     
 
Total receivables
  $ 255,635       272,668  
 
   
     
 

The Company provides an allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts based upon historical experience and management’s judgement . At June 28, 2003 and December 28, 2002 the allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts was $12,578,000 and $9,502,000, respectively.

(7)      Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are evaluated for impairment annually or whenever there is an impairment indicator. All goodwill is assigned to a reporting unit, where it is subject to an impairment test based on fair value. The Company completed its review of the Company’s goodwill values in the second quarter of 2002. As a result of this review, the Company determined that goodwill arising from the acquisition of Mitch Cooper and Associates was impaired due to declining demand and margins in this business. Mitch Cooper and Associates was a supply chain re-engineering consulting practice. The impairment charge to reflect this goodwill at fair value was $786,000, net of tax and is reflected as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle as of the beginning of 2002. The Company used a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the fair value of the reporting units. The Company’s 2003 review of goodwill was completed in the second quarter of 2003 and indicated that goodwill was not impaired.

The Company’s intangible assets, other than goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives, are all subject to amortization and are summarized as follows:

                                         
                                         
            June 28, 2003   December 28, 2002
           
 
    Weighted                                
    Average   Gross           Gross        
    Amortization   Carrying   Accumulated   Carrying   Accumulated
    Period (Yrs)   Amount   Amortization   Amount   Amortization
(In thousands)  
 
 
 
 
Purchased software
    5.0     $ 29,385       11,481       28,938       8,649  
Customer lists
    7.0       3,700       1,447       3,700       1,183  
Patents
    14.0       394       74       377       63  
Non-compete agreements
    7.0       50       19       50       15  
 
   
     
     
     
     
 
Total
    5.33     $ 33,529       13,021       33,065       9,910  
 
           
     
     
     
 

Aggregate amortization expense for the six months ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002 was $3,111,000 and $1,825,000 respectively. Estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five years is as follows:

7


Table of Contents

                 
For the remaining six months:
    2003     $ 3,068  
For year ended:
    2004       5,950  
 
    2005       5,363  
 
    2006       4,105  
 
    2007       1,759  

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six months ended June 28, 2003 are as follows:

         
Balance as of December 28, 2002
  $ 45,938  
Goodwill acquired during the six months ended June 28, 2003
     
Foreign currency translation adjustment at June 28, 2003
    1,208  
 
   
 
Balance as of June 28, 2003
  $ 47,146  
 
   
 

(8)      Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year consolidated financial statement presentation.

(9)      Contingencies

As disclosed in our Form 10Q for the quarterly period ending March 29, 2003, the Company received notice in April 2003 that three shareholder class action lawsuits were filed against it. Since that time, five additional shareholder class lawsuits (Brian K. Counsil, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Cerner Corporation, Neal Patterson, Mark Naulten [sic], and Paul Black, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Civil Action No. 4:03-cv-00427-DW, Filed May 15, 2003; Charles C. Schmidt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Cerner Corporation, Neal Patterson, Mark Naulton [sic], and Paul Black, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Civil Action No. 4:03-cv-00431-JTM, filed May 16, 2003; Andrew Garner, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Cerner Corporation, Neal Patterson, Mark Naulten [sic], and Paul Black, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Civil Action No. 4:03-cv-00436-GAF, filed May 19, 2003, Dana Bible, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Cerner Corporation, Neal L. Patterson, Earl H. Devanny, III, Clifford W. Illig, Marc G. Naughton, and Glenn P. Tobin, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Civil Action No. 4:03-cv-00448-JTM, Filed May 21, 2003; Eugene Pronojust, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Cerner Corporation, Neal Patterson, Marc Naughton, and Paul Black, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Civil Action No. 4:03-cv-00449-DW, Filed May 21, 2003) have been filed against the company. All these lawsuits were filed after a decline in Company’s stock price following the Company’s announcement on April 3, 2003 that the Company would not meet revenue and earnings estimates for the first quarter of 2003.

In general, the lawsuits allege that, during various class periods commencing as early as July 17, 2002 and ending April 2, 2003, the Company and individual named defendants misrepresented or failed to disclose certain factors, which they allege impacted the Company’s business and anticipated revenue and earnings, all allegedly in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

Given that the lawsuits have only recently been filed, we cannot currently predict the outcome of such litigation or the amount of any potential loss if our defense is unsuccessful; however, we believe that all the claims in the lawsuits are without merit and we intend to vigorously defend such claims. The named executive officers and the Company are insured persons within the coverage and subject to the limits of the Company’s Directors and Officers and Corporate Liability Insurance for such claims and notice of these claims has been given to the insurance carrier.

8


Table of Contents

Item 2.      Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 28, 2003 Compared to Three Months Ended June 29, 2002

The Company’s revenues, including revenues from reimbursed travel, increased 11% to $207,695,000 for the three-month period ended June 28, 2003 from $186,824,000 for the three-month period ended June 29, 2002. Beginning in the first quarter of 2003, the Company began including proceeds from reimbursed travel expense in revenue with a corresponding amount included in cost of revenues. This change has no impact on the dollar amount of gross margin, operating margin, or net earnings, but does slightly change the percent of revenue each of these items represent. Net earnings decreased 39% to $8,943,000 in the 2003 period from $14,692,000 for the 2002 period. Net earnings for the three months ended June 29, 2002 included a gain from the sale of shares of WebMD common stock of $2,736,000, net of tax. The decrease in net earnings was primarily due to an increase in expenses compared to the prior year quarter and due to a non-operating gain on the sale of WebMD shares in 2002.

System sales revenues increased 10% to $82,742,000 for the three-month period ended June 28, 2003 from $75,291,000 for the corresponding period in 2002. Included in system sales are revenues primarily from the sale of software, hardware, sublicensed software and for the services required to install them. The increase in system sales is due to an increase in new contract bookings in the quarter ended June 28, 2003 compared to the prior year quarter.

Support, maintenance and service revenues increased 10% to $116,240,000 during the second quarter of 2003 from $105,282,000 during the same period in 2002. Support and maintenance revenues were $50,008,000 and $42,109,000 for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Service revenues were $66,232,000 and $63,173,000 for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Included in support, maintenance and service revenues are support and maintenance of software and hardware, and professional services excluding installation. This increase was due primarily to the increase in professional services, resulting from an increase in services related to and services provided into the Company’s installed and converted client base.

At June 28, 2003, the Company had $788,141,000 in contract backlog and $290,396,000 in support and maintenance backlog, compared to $656,345,000 in contract backlog and $261,267,000 in support and maintenance backlog at June 29, 2002.

The cost of revenues includes the cost of third party consulting services, computer hardware and sublicensed software purchased from computer and software manufacturers for delivery to clients and commissions. It also includes the cost of hardware maintenance and sublicensed software support subcontracted to manufacturers. The cost of revenue was 26% of total revenues in the second quarter of 2003 and 24% of total revenues in the second quarter of 2002. Such costs, as a percent of revenues, typically have varied as the mix of revenue (software, hardware, maintenance, support, and reimbursed travel) components carrying different margin rates changes from period to period.

Sales and client service expenses include salaries of client service personnel, communications expenses and unreimbursed travel expenses. Also included are sales and marketing salaries, trade show costs and advertising costs. These expenses as a percent of total revenues were 42% and 41% in the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in total sales and client service expenses to $86,646,000 in the second quarter of 2003 from $76,837,000 in the same period of 2002 was attributable to the cost of a larger field sales and services organization and marketing of new products.

Software development expenses include salaries, documentation and other direct expenses incurred in product development and amortization of software development costs. Total expenditures for software development, including both capitalized and noncapitalized portions, for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002 were $44,171,000 and $35,938,000, respectively. These amounts exclude amortization. Capitalized software costs were $14,508,000 and $11,799,000 for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in aggregate expenditures for software development in 2003 is due to continued development of Cerner Millennium ™ software solutions and development of community care software solutions.

9


Table of Contents

General and administrative expenses include salaries for corporate, financial and administrative staffs, utilities, communications expenses, and professional fees. These expenses as a percent of total revenues were 6% and 7% in the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Total general and administrative expenses for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002 were $13,149,000 and $12,300,000, respectively. The increase is due primarily to the growth of the Company’s core business and as a result of acquisitions.

Net interest expense was $1,603,000 in the second quarter of 2003 compared to $1,373,000 in the second quarter of 2002.

In the second quarter of 2002, the Company sold 14,820,527 shares of WebMD for $90,119,000. Accordingly, the Company recorded an investment gain of $2,736,000, net of $1,572,000 in tax, as a result of the sale.

The Company’s effective tax rates were 39.9 % and 38.3% for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Six Months Ended June 28, 2003 Compared to Six Months Ended June 29, 2002

The Company’s revenues, including revenues from reimbursed travel, increased 10% to $405,886,000 for the six-month period ended June 28, 2003 from $368,246,000 for the six-month period ended June 29, 2002. Beginning in the first quarter of 2003, the Company began including proceeds from reimbursed travel expense in revenue with a corresponding amount included in cost of revenues. This change has no impact on the dollar amount of gross margin, operating margin, or net earnings, but does slightly change the percent of revenue each of these items represent. Net earnings decreased 40% to $14,536,000 in the 2003 period from $24,310,000 for the 2002 period. Net earnings for the six months ended June 29, 2002 included a gain from the sale of shares of WebMD common stock of $2,736,000, net of tax and a charge of $786,000, net of tax, due to the cumulative effect of a change in accounting for goodwill. The decrease in net earnings was due to a lower level of new contract bookings and an increase in expenses compared to the prior year period as well as a non-operating gain on the sale of WebMD shares in 2002.

System sales revenues increased 4% to $161,336,000 for the six-month period ended June 28, 2003 from $154,535,000 for the corresponding period in 2002. Included in system sales are revenues primarily from the sale of software, hardware, sublicensed software and for the services required to install them.

Support, maintenance and service revenues increased 14% to $229,172,000 during the first six month of 2003 from $201,318,000 during the same period in 2002. Support and maintenance revenues were $98,040,000 and $84,113,000 for the first six months of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Service revenues were $131,132,000 and $117,205,000 for the first six months of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Included in support, maintenance and service revenues are support and maintenance of software and hardware, and professional services excluding installation. This increase was due primarily to the increase in professional services, resulting from an increase in services related to and services provided into the Company’s installed and converted client base.

At June 28, 2003, the Company had $788,141,000 in contract backlog and $290,396,000 in support and maintenance backlog, compared to $656,345,000 in contract backlog and $261,267,000 in support and maintenance backlog at June 29, 2002.

The cost of revenues includes the cost of third party consulting services, computer hardware and sublicensed software purchased from computer and software manufacturers for delivery to clients and commissions. It also includes the cost of hardware maintenance and sublicensed software support subcontracted to manufacturers. The cost of revenue was 25% of total revenues in the six-month period of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Such costs, as a percent of revenues, typically have varied as the mix of revenue (software, hardware, maintenance, support, and reimbursed travel) components carrying different margin rates changes from period to period.

Sales and client service expenses include salaries of client service personnel, communications expenses and unreimbursed travel expenses. Also included are sales and marketing salaries, trade show costs and advertising costs. These expenses as a percent of total revenues were 43% and 41% in the six-month period of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in total sales and client service expenses to

10


Table of Contents

$174,737,000 in the second quarter of 2003 from $151,255,000 in the same period of 2002 was attributable to the cost of a larger field sales and services organization and marketing of new software solutions.

Software development expenses include salaries, documentation and other direct expenses incurred in product development and amortization of software development costs. Total expenditures for software development, including both capitalized and noncapitalized portions, for the six-month periods of 2003 and 2002 were $87,232,000 and $69,478,000, respectively. These amounts exclude amortization. Capitalized software costs were $28,749,000 and $22,915,000 for the six-month periods of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The increase in aggregate expenditures for software development in 2003 is due to continued development of Cerner Millennium ™ software solutions and development of community care software solutions.

General and administrative expenses include salaries for corporate, financial and administrative staffs, utilities, communications expenses, and professional fees. These expenses as a percent of total revenues were 6% in the first six months of 2003 and 7% in the first six months of 2002. Total general and administrative expenses for the first six months of 2003 and 2002 were $26,291,000 and $24,342,000 respectively. The increase is due primarily to the growth of the Company’s core business and as a result of acquisitions.

Net interest expense was $3,449,000 in the six-month period of 2003 compared to $2,896,000 in the second quarter of 2002.

In the second quarter of 2002, the Company sold 14,820,527 shares of WebMD for $90,119,000. Accordingly, the Company recorded an investment gain of $2,736,000, net of $1,572,000 in tax, as a result of the sale.

The Company’s effective tax rates were 40.2 % and 38.8% for the second quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

The Company’s liquidity position remains strong with total cash and cash equivalents of $121,038,000 at June 28, 2003 and working capital of $255,257,000. The Company generated cash from operating activities of $58,535,000 and $8,450,000 during the six-month periods ended June 28, 2003 and June 29, 2002, respectively. Cash flow from operations increased in the 2003 period, primarily due to increased collection of receivables and improved payment terms.

Cash used in investing activities consisted primarily of purchases of capital equipment of $11,344,000 and $21,493,000, purchases of land, buildings, and improvements of $22,586,000 and $5,484,000, and capitalized software development costs of $28,749,000 and $22,915,000, in the first six months of 2003 and 2002, respectively. The Company also used cash for the acquisition of a business of $13,429,000 in the first six months of 2002. Cash provided from investing activities in the first six months of 2002 included $90,119,000 from the proceeds from the sale of the WebMD stock.

The Company’s financing activities for the first six months consisted primarily of the repayment of long-term debt of $14,015,000 and the purchase of treasury stock of $5,930,000. For the first six months of 2002, the Company used cash for net repayments of long-term debt of $1,933,000.

The Company’s liquidity is influenced by many factors, including the amount and timing of the Company’s revenues, its cash collections from its clients as implementation of its software solutions proceed and the amounts the Company invests in software development and capital expenditures. The Company believes that its present cash position, together with cash generated from operations, and the Company’s line of credit will be sufficient to meet anticipated cash requirements during 2003. The Company has $90,000,000 of long-term, revolving credit from banks. At June 28, 2003, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under this agreement.

At June 28, 2003, the Company was committed to spending approximately $63,000,000 under construction contracts for two new buildings at its Kansas City headquarters complex. As of June 28, 2003, the Company had spent $49,050,000 of the total commitment. The construction will be financed by the Company’s cash position, cash generated from operations and, if necessary, the line of credit.

11


Table of Contents

The effects of inflation on the Company’s business during the period discussed herein were minimal.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” and Interpretation of APB No. 51. The Interpretations provide guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than through voting rights (“variable interest entities’ or VIEs”) and how to determine when and which business enterprises should consolidate the VIE (the “primary beneficiary”). In addition, FIN 46 requires that both the primary beneficiary and all other enterprises with a significant variable interest in a VIE make additional disclosures. For variable interest entities created before February 1, 2003, FIN 46 is applicable in the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003.

Management is currently in the process of assessing what impact, if any, the adoption of these Interpretations will have on our consolidated financial statements or disclosures.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company believes that there are several accounting policies that are critical to understanding the Company’s historical and future performance, as these policies affect the reported amount of revenue and other significant areas involving management’s judgments and estimates. These significant accounting policies relate to revenue recognition, software development costs, other-than-temporary declines in the market value of investments, allowance for doubtful accounts, and potential impairments of goodwill. These policies and the Company’s procedures related to these policies are described in detail below and under specific areas within the discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues are derived primarily from the sale of clinical financial and administrative information systems and solutions. The components of the system sales revenues are the licensing of computer software, installation, subscription content and the sale of computer hardware and sublicensed software. The components of support, maintenance and service revenues are software support and hardware maintenance, remote hosting and outsourcing, training, consulting and implementation services.

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position (SOP) No. 97-2, “Software Revenue Recognition,” as amended by SOP No. 98-4, SOP 98-9 and clarified by Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 101 “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” SOP No 97-2, as amended, generally requires revenue earned on software arrangements involving multiple-elements to be allocated to each element based on the relative fair values of those elements. Revenue from multiple-element software arrangements is recognized using the residual method. Under the residual method, revenue is recognized in a multiple-element arrangement when Company-specific objective evidence of fair value exists for all of the undelivered elements in the arrangement (i.e. professional services, software support, hardware maintenance, hardware and sublicensed software), but does not exist for one or more of the delivered elements in the arrangement (i.e. software solutions). The Company allocates revenue to each element in a multiple-element arrangement based on the element’s respective fair value, with the fair value determined by the price charged when that element is sold separately. Specifically, the Company determines the fair value of the maintenance portion of the arrangement based on the renewal price of the maintenance charged to clients, professional services portion of the arrangement, other than installation services, based on hourly rates which the Company charges for these services when sold apart from a software license, and the hardware and sublicensed software based on the prices for these elements when they are sold separately from the software. If evidence of the fair value cannot be established for the undelivered elements of a license agreement, the entire amount of revenue under the arrangement is deferred until these elements have been delivered or objective evidence can be established.

Inherent in the revenue recognition process are significant management estimates and judgments, which influence the timing and the amount of revenue recognition. The Company provides several models for the procurement of its clinical, financial and administrative information systems. The predominant method is a perpetual software license agreement, project-related installation services, implementation and consulting services, computer hardware and sublicensed software and software support. For those arrangements involving the use of services, the Company uses the percentage of completion method of

12


Table of Contents

accounting, following the guidance in the AICPA Statement of Position No. 81-1 (SOP 81-1), Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts.

The Company provides installation services, which include project-scoping services, conducting pre-installation audits and creating initial environments. Because installation services are deemed to be essential to the functionality of the software, software license and installation services fees are recognized over the software installation period using output measures which reflect direct labor hours incurred, beginning at software delivery and culminating at completion of installation, typically a three-to-six month process.

The Company also provides implementation and consulting services, which include consulting activities that fall outside of the scope of the standard installation services. These services vary depending on the scope and complexity requested by the client. Examples of such services may include additional database consulting, system configuration, project management, testing assistance, network consulting and post conversion review services. Implementation and consulting services generally are not deemed to be essential to the functionality of the software, and thus do not impact the timing of the software license recognition, unless software license fees are tied to implementation milestones. In those instances, the portion of the software license fee tied to implementation milestones is deferred until the related milestone is accomplished and related fees become billable and non-forfeitable. Implementation fees are recognized over the service period, which may extend from six months to three years.

Remote hosting and outsourcing services are marketed under long-term arrangements generally over periods of five to 10 years. Revenues from these arrangements are recognized as the services are performed.

Software maintenance fees are marketed under annual and multi-year arrangements and are recognized as revenue ratably over the contracted maintenance term. Hardware maintenance revenues are billed and recognized monthly over the contracted maintenance term.

Subscription and content fees are generally marketed under annual and multi-year agreements and are recognized ratably over the contracted terms.

Hardware and sublicensed software sales are generally recognized upon delivery to the client.

The Company also offers its solutions on an application service provider (“ASP”) or a term license basis, making available Company software functionality on a remote processing basis from the Company’s data centers. The data centers provide system and administrative support as well as processing services. Revenue on software and services provided on an ASP or term license basis is recognized on a monthly basis over the term of the contract. The Company capitalizes related direct costs consisting of third-party costs and direct software installation and implementation costs. These costs are amortized over the term of the arrangement.

In limited cases where the Company has contractually agreed to develop new or customized software code for a client, the Company utilizes percentage of completion accounting in accordance with SOP 81-1.

Deferred revenue is comprised of deferrals for license fees, maintenance and other services for which payment has been received and for which the service has not yet been performed.

Software Development Costs

Costs incurred internally in creating computer software solutions are expensed until technological feasibility has been established upon completion of a detailed program design. Thereafter, all software development costs are capitalized and subsequently reported at the lower of amortized cost or net realizable value. Capitalized costs are amortized based on current and expected future revenue for each solution with minimum annual amortization equal to the straight-line amortization over the estimated economic life of the solution. The Company is amortizing capitalized costs over five years. During the first six months of 2003 and 2002, the Company capitalized $28,749,000 and $22,915,000, respectively, of total software development costs of $87,232,000 and $69,478,000, respectively.

The Company expects that major software information systems companies, large information technology consulting service providers and systems integrators, internet-based start-up companies and others

13


Table of Contents

specializing in the health care industry may offer competitive products or services. The pace of change in the health care information systems market is rapid and there are frequent new product introductions, product enhancements and evolving industry standards and requirements. As a result, the capitalized software may become less valuable or obsolete and could be subject to impairment.

Investments

The Company accounts for its investments in equity securities, which have readily determinable fair values as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported, net of tax, as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. For realized gains and losses on available-for-sale investments, the Company utilizes the specific identification method as the basis to determine cost. Investments in the common stock of certain affiliates over which the Company exerts significant influence are accounted for by the equity method.

All equity securities are reviewed by the Company for declines in fair value. If such declines are considered to be other than temporary, the cost basis of the individual security is written down to fair value as a new cost basis, and the amount of the write-down is included in earnings.

The Company also has certain other minority equity investments in non-publicly traded securities. These investments are generally carried at cost as the Company owns less than 20% of the voting equity and does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over these companies. The balance of these investments at June 28, 2003 and December 28, 2002 was $876,000. These investments are inherently high risk as the market for technologies and content by these companies are usually early stage at the time of the investment by the Company and such markets may never be significant. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor operating results of underlying investments could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investments that may not be reflected in an investment’s current carrying value, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future. The Company could lose its entire investment in certain or all of these companies. The Company monitors these investments for impairment and makes appropriate reductions in carrying values when necessary.

Concentrations

Substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments are held at three major U.S. financial institutions. The majority of the Company’s cash equivalents consist of U.S. Federal Government Agency Securities, short-term marketable securities, and overnight repurchase agreements. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, bear minimal risk.

Substantially all of the Company’s clients are integrated delivery networks, hospitals, and other health care-related organizations. If significant adverse macro-economic factors were to impact these organizations, it could materially adversely affect the Company. The Company’s access to certain software and hardware components are dependent upon single and sole source suppliers. The inability of any supplier to fulfill supply requirements of the Company could affect future results.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its clients and generally does not require collateral from its clients. The Company maintains an allowance for potential losses on a specific identification basis and based on historical experience and management’s judgments. The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts as of June 28, 2003 and December 28, 2002 was $12,578,000 and $9,502,000, respectively.

Goodwill

Effective December 30, 2001, the Company adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” As a result, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are evaluated for impairment annually or whenever there is an impairment indicator. All goodwill is assigned to a reporting unit, where it is subject to an impairment test based on fair value. The Company completed its review of the Company’s goodwill values in the second quarter of 2002. As a result of this review, the Company determined that goodwill arising from the acquisition of Mitch Cooper and Associates was impaired due to declining demand and

14


Table of Contents

margins in this business. Mitch Cooper and Associates was a supply chain re-engineering consulting practice. The impairment charge to reflect this goodwill at fair value was $786,000, net of tax, and is reflected as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle as of the beginning of 2002. The Company used a discounted cash flow analysis to determine the fair value of the reporting units. The Company completed three acquisitions subsequent to June 30, 2001, which resulted in approximately, $36.7 million of goodwill that was not amortized in accordance with SFAS 142. The Company’s 2003 review of goodwill was completed in the second quarter of 2003 and indicated that goodwill was not impaired.

Factors that may Affect Future Results of Operations, Financial Condition or Business

Statements made in this report, the Annual Report to Shareholders in which this report is made a part, other reports and proxy statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, communications to shareholders, press releases and oral statements made by representatives of the Company that are not historical in nature, or that state the Company’s or management’s intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or predictions of the future, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements can often be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “could,” “should,” “will,” “will be,” “will lead,” “will assist,” “intended,” “continue,” “believe,” “may,” “expect,” “hope,” “anticipate,” “goal,” “forecast,” “plan,” or “estimate” or variations thereof or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance or results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. It is important to note that any such performance and actual results, financial condition or business, could differ materially from those expressed in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed below as well as those discussed elsewhere in reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Other unforeseen factors not identified herein could also have such an effect. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in future operating results, financial condition or business over time.

Quarterly Operating Results May Vary - The Company’s quarterly operating results have varied in the past and may continue to vary in future periods. Quarterly operating results may vary for a number of reasons including accounting policy changes mandated by regulating entities (including, but not limited to, any accounting policy change concerning the expensing of options), demand for the Company’s software solutions and services, the Company’s long sales cycle, potentially long installation and implementation cycle for these larger, more complex and costlier systems and other factors described in this section and elsewhere in this report. As a result of health care industry trends and the market for the Company’s Cerner Millennium solutions, a large percentage of the Company’s revenues are generated by the sale and installation of larger, more complex and costlier systems. The sales process for these systems is lengthy and involves a significant technical evaluation and commitment of capital and other resources by the client. The sale may be subject to delays due to clients’ internal budgets and procedures for approving large capital expenditures and by competing needs for other capital expenditures and deploying new technologies or personnel resources. Delays in the expected sale or installation of these large contracts may have a significant impact on the Company’s anticipated quarterly revenues and consequently its earnings, since a significant percentage of the Company’s expenses are relatively fixed.

These larger, more complex and costlier systems are installed and implemented over time periods ranging from approximately one month to three years and may involve significant efforts both by the Company and the client. The Company recognizes revenue upon the completion of standard milestone conditions and the amount of revenue recognized in any quarter depends upon the Company’s and the client’s ability to meet these project milestones. Delays in meeting these milestone conditions or modification of the contract relating to one or more of these systems could result in a shift of revenue recognition from one quarter to another and could have a material adverse effect on results of operations for a particular quarter. In addition, support payments by clients for the Company’s solutions generally do not commence until the solution is in use.

The Company’s revenues from system sales historically have been lower in the first quarter of the year and greater in the fourth quarter of the year, primarily as a result of the clients’ year-end efforts to make all final capital expenditures for the current year.

15


Table of Contents

Stock Price May Be Volatile - The trading price of the Company’s common stock may be volatile. The market for the Company’s common stock may experience significant price and volume fluctuations in response to a number of factors including actual or anticipated quarterly variations in operating results, rumors about the Company’s performance or software solutions, changes in expectations of future financial performance or changes in estimates of securities analysts, governmental regulatory action, health care reform measures, client relationship developments, changes occurring in the securities markets in general and other factors, many of which are beyond the Company’s control. As a matter of policy, the Company does not generally comment on rumors.

Furthermore, the stock market in general, and the market for software, health care and high technology companies in particular, has experienced extreme volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of the Company’s common stock, regardless of actual operating performance.

Changes in the Health Care Industry - The health care industry is highly regulated and is subject to changing political, economic and regulatory influences. For example, the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (Public Law 105-32) contains significant changes to Medicare and Medicaid and began to have its initial impact in 1998 due to limitations on reimbursement, resulting cost containment initiatives, and effects on pricing and demand for capital intensive systems. In addition, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) will have a direct impact on the health care industry by requiring identifiers and standardized transactions/code sets and necessary security and privacy measures in order to ensure the protection of patient health information. These factors affect the purchasing practices and operation of health care organizations. Federal and state legislatures have periodically considered programs to reform or amend the U.S. health care system at both the federal and state level and to change health care financing and reimbursement systems. These programs may contain proposals to increase governmental involvement in health care, lower reimbursement rates or otherwise change the environment in which health care industry participants operate. Health care industry participants may respond by reducing their investments or postponing investment decisions, including investments in the Company’s software solutions and services.

Many health care providers are consolidating to create integrated health care delivery systems with greater market power. These providers may try to use their market power to negotiate price reductions for the Company’s software solutions and services. As the health care industry consolidates, the Company’s client base could be eroded, competition for clients could become more intense and the importance of acquiring each client becomes greater.

Significant Competition - The market for health care information systems is intensely competitive, rapidly evolving and subject to rapid technological change. The Company believes that the principal competitive factors in this market include the breadth and quality of system and software solution offerings, the stability of the information systems provider, the features and capabilities of the information systems, the ongoing support for the system and the potential for enhancements and future compatible software solutions.

Certain of the Company’s competitors have greater financial, technical, product development, marketing and other resources than the Company and some of its competitors offer software solutions that it does not offer. The Company’s principal existing competitors include GE Medical Systems, Siemens Medical Solutions Health Services Corporation, IDX Systems Corporation, McKesson Corporation, Eclipsys Corporation, Medical Information Technology, Inc. (“Meditech”) and Epic Systems Corporation, each of which offers a suite of software solutions that compete with many of the Company’s software solutions and services. There are other competitors that offer a more limited number of competing software solutions.

In addition, the Company expects that major software information systems companies, large information technology consulting service providers and system integrators, internet-based start-up companies and others specializing in the health care industry may offer competitive software/solutions or services. The pace of change in the health care information systems market is rapid and there are frequent new software solution introductions, software solution enhancements and evolving industry standards and requirements. As a result, the Company’s success will depend upon its ability to keep pace with technological change and to introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new and enhanced software solutions and services that satisfy changing client requirements and achieve market acceptance.

16


Table of Contents

Proprietary Technology May Be Subjected to Infringement Claims or May Be Infringed Upon - The Company relies upon a combination of license agreements, confidentiality procedures, employee nondisclosure agreements and technical measures to maintain the confidentiality and trade secrecy of its proprietary information. The Company also relies on trademark and copyright laws to protect its intellectual property. The Company has initiated a patent program but currently has a very limited patent portfolio. As a result, the Company may not be able to protect against misappropriation of its intellectual property.

In addition, the Company could be subject to intellectual property infringement claims as the number of competitors grows and the functionality of its software solutions and services overlaps with competitive offerings. These claims, even if not meritorious, could be expensive to defend. If the Company becomes liable to third parties for infringing their intellectual property rights, it could be required to pay a substantial damage award and to develop noninfringing technology, obtain a license or cease selling the software solutions that contain the infringing intellectual property.

Government Regulation - The United States Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) has declared that software products intended for the maintenance of data used in making decisions regarding the suitability of blood donors and the release of blood or blood components for transfusion are medical devices under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (“Act”) and amendments to the Act. As a consequence, the Company is subject to extensive regulation by the FDA with regard to its blood bank software. If other of the Company’s software solutions are deemed to be actively regulated medical devices by the FDA, the Company could be subject to extensive requirements governing pre- and post-marketing requirements including pre-market notification clearance prior to marketing. Complying with these FDA regulations would be time consuming and expensive. It is possible that the FDA may become more active in regulating computer software that is used in health care.

Following an inspection by the FDA in March of 1998, the Company received a Form FDA 483 (Notice of Inspectional Observations) alleging non-compliance with certain aspects of FDA’s Quality System Regulation with respect to the Company’s PathNet HNAC Blood Bank Transfusion and Donor products (the “Blood Bank Products”). The Company subsequently received a Warning Letter, dated April 29, 1998, as a result of the same inspection. The Company responded promptly to the FDA and undertook a number of actions in response to the Form 483 and Warning Letter including an audit by a third party of the Company’s Blood Bank Products and improvements to Cerner’s Quality System. A copy of the third party audit was submitted to the FDA in October of 1998 and, at the request of the FDA, additional information and clarification were submitted to the FDA in January of 1999.

There can be no assurance, however, that the Company’s actions taken in response to the Form 483 and Warning Letter will be deemed adequate by the FDA or that additional actions on behalf of the Company will not be required. In addition, the Company remains subject to periodic FDA inspections and there can be no assurances that the Company will not be required to undertake additional actions to comply with the Act and any other applicable regulatory requirements. Any failure by the Company to comply with the Act and any other applicable regulatory requirements could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to continue to manufacture and distribute its software solutions. The FDA has many enforcement tools including recalls, seizures, injunctions, civil fines and/or criminal prosecutions. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations or financial condition.

Product Related Liabilities - Many of the Company’s software solutions provide data for use by health care providers in providing care to patients. Although no such claims have been brought against the Company to date regarding injuries related to the use of its software solutions, such claims may be made in the future. Although the Company maintains product liability insurance coverage in an amount that it believes is sufficient for its business, there can be no assurance that such coverage will cover a particular claim that may be brought in the future, prove to be adequate or that such coverage will continue to remain available on acceptable terms, if at all. A successful claim brought against the Company, which is uninsured, or under-insured could materially harm its business, results of operations or financial condition.

System Errors and Warranties - The Company’s systems, particularly the Cerner Millennium versions, are very complex. As with complex systems offered by others, the Company’s systems may contain errors, especially when first introduced. Although the Company conducts extensive testing, it has discovered software errors in its software solutions after their introduction. The Company’s systems are intended for use in collecting and displaying clinical information used in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. Therefore, users of the Company software solutions have a greater sensitivity to system errors than the

17


Table of Contents

market for software products generally. The Company’s agreements with its clients typically provide warranties against material errors and other matters. Failure of a client’s system to meet these criteria could constitute a material breach under such contracts allowing the client to cancel the contract and obtain a refund and/or damages, or could require the Company to incur additional expense in order to make the system meet these criteria. The Company’s contracts with its clients generally limit the Company’s liability arising from such claims but such limits may not be enforceable in certain jurisdictions or circumstances.

Anti-Takeover Defenses - The Company’s charter, bylaws, shareholders’ rights plan and certain provisions of Delaware law contain certain provisions that may have the effect of delaying or preventing an acquisition of the Company. Such provisions are intended to encourage any person interested in acquiring the Company to negotiate with and obtain the approval of the Board of Directors in connection with any such transaction. These provisions include (a) a Board of Directors that is staggered into three classes to serve staggered three-year terms, (b) blank check preferred stock, (c) supermajority voting provisions, (d) inability of shareholders to act by written consent or call a special meeting, (e) limitations on the ability of shareholders to nominate directors or make proposals at shareholder meetings and (f) triggering the exercisability of stock purchase rights on a discriminatory basis, which may invoke extensive economic and voting dilution of a potential acquirer if its beneficial ownership of the Company’s common stock exceeds a specified threshold. Certain of these provisions may discourage a future acquisition of the Company not approved by the Board of Directors in which shareholders might receive a premium value for their shares.

Risks Associated with the Company’s Global Operations – The Company markets, sells and services its software solutions globally. The Company has established offices around the world, including in North America, Europe and in the Asia Pacific region. The Company will continue to expand its global operations and enter new global markets. This expansion will require significant management attention and financial resources to develop successful direct and indirect global sales and support channels. In some countries, the Company’s success will depend in part on its ability to form relationships with local partners. There is a risk that the Company may sometimes choose the wrong partner. For these reasons, the Company may not be able to maintain or increase global market demand for its software solutions.

Global operations are subject to inherent risks, and the Company’s future results could be adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable and changing factors. These include:

    Greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods;
 
    Difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations;
 
    The impact of economic conditions outside the United States;
 
    Unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
 
    Certification requirements;
 
    Reduced protection of intellectual property rights in some countries;
 
    Potentially adverse tax consequences;
 
    Political instability;
 
    Trade protection measures and other regulatory requirements;
 
    Service provider and government spending patterns;
 
    Natural disasters, war or terrorist acts;
 
    Poor selection of a partner in a country; and
 
    Political conditions which may threaten the safety of associates or the continued presence of the Company in these countries.

18


Table of Contents

Item 3.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4.      Controls and Procedures

Within the 90-day period prior to the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(c)). The principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on their review, that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. No significant changes were made to the Company’s internal controls or other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

Part II. Other Information

Item 1.     Legal Proceedings

As disclosed in our Form 10Q for the quarterly period ending March 29, 2003, the Company received notice in April 2003 that three shareholder class action lawsuits were filed against it. Since that time, five additional shareholder class lawsuits (Brian K. Counsil, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Cerner Corporation, Neal Patterson, Mark Naulten [sic], and Paul Black, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Civil Action No. 4:03-cv-00427-DW, Filed May 15, 2003; Charles C. Schmidt, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Cerner Corporation, Neal Patterson, Mark Naulton [sic], and Paul Black, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Civil Action No. 4:03-cv-00431-JTM, filed May 16, 2003; Andrew Garner, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Cerner Corporation, Neal Patterson, Mark Naulten [sic], and Paul Black, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Civil Action No. 4:03-cv-00436-GAF, filed May 19, 2003, Dana Bible, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Cerner Corporation, Neal L. Patterson, Earl H. Devanny, III, Clifford W. Illig, Marc G. Naughton, and Glenn P. Tobin, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Civil Action No. 4:03-cv-00448-JTM, Filed May 21, 2003; Eugene Pronojust, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Cerner Corporation, Neal Patterson, Marc Naughton, and Paul Black, United States District Court, Western District of Missouri, Civil Action No. 4:03-cv-00449-DW, Filed May 21, 2003) have been filed against the company. All these lawsuits were filed after a decline in Company’s stock price following the Company’s announcement on April 3, 2003 that the Company would not meet revenue and earnings estimates for the first quarter of 2003.

In general, the lawsuits allege that, during various class periods commencing as early as July 17, 2002 and ending April 2, 2003, the Company and individual named defendants misrepresented or failed to disclose certain factors, which they allege impacted the Company’s business and anticipated revenue and earnings, all allegedly in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder.

Given that the lawsuits have only recently been filed, we cannot currently predict the outcome of such litigation or the amount of any potential loss if our defense is unsuccessful; however, we believe that all the claims in the lawsuits are without merit and we intend to vigorously defend such claims. The named executive officers and the Company are insured persons within the coverage and subject to the limits of the Company’s Directors and Officers and Corporate Liability Insurance for such claims and notice of these claims has been given to the insurance carrier.

Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

At the Company’s annual shareholders meeting held on May 23, 2003, Clifford W. Illig and William B. Neaves, Ph.D., were re-elected as Class II directors. Neal L. Patterson, Jeff C. Goldsmith, John C. Danforth, Gerald E. Bisbee, Jr, Ph.D., Michael E. Herman, and Nancy-Ann DeParle continued as directors after the meeting.

19


Table of Contents

                         
                    Abstention and Broker
    For   Withheld   Non-Votes
   
 
 
Clifford W. Illig
    23,254,759       307,619        
William B. Neaves
    21,540,407       2,021,971        

Item 6.     Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

  (a)   Exhibits

     
10(a)   Cerner Corporation Enhanced Severance Pay Plan and Summary Plan Description dated May12, 2003
 
32.1   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
32.2   Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

  (b)   Reports on Form 8-K
 
      The following Reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Company during the quarter for which this report is filed:
 
      Report on Form 8-K filed on April 3, 2003 which contained the text of the Press Release issued that same date announcing lowered revenue and earnings guidance for the first quarter of 2003.
 
      Report on Form 8-K filed on April 17, 2003 which contained the text of the Press Release issued that same date announcing earnings for the first quarter of 2003.
 
      Report on Form 8-K filed on April 22, 2003 which contained the text of the Press Release issued that same date announcing the Company’s new share repurchase program.

20


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

     
  CERNER CORPORATION
Registrant
     
August 1, 2003 By: /s/Marc G. Naughton

 
        Date   Marc G. Naughton
    Chief Financial Officer

21


Table of Contents

CERTIFICATIONS

     I, Neal L. Patterson, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Cerner Corporation, certify that:

     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cerner Corporation;

     2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

       a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
       b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
       c)     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.          The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

       a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
       b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

     6.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

     
     Date: August 1, 2003    
     
    /s/ Neal L. Patterson
   
    Neal L. Patterson
    Chairman of the Board
    and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cerner Corporation and will be retained by Cerner Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

22


Table of Contents

     I, Marc G. Naughton, Chief Financial Officer of Cerner Corporation, certify that:

     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cerner Corporation;

     2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

       a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
       b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
       c)     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

       a)     all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
       b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

     6.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

     
     Date: August 1, 2003    
     
    /s/ Marc G. Naughton
   
    Marc G. Naughton
    Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Cerner Corporation and will be retained by Cerner Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

23