SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
FORM 10-Q
(Mark one)
(x)
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2004
OR
( )
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from..................to.........................
Commission file number: 0-21969
CIENA CORPORATION
Delaware | 23-2725311 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
incorporation or organization) |
1201 Winterson Road, Linthicum, MD | 21090 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(410) 865-8500
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES (X) NO ( )
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). YES (X) NO ( )
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:
Class |
Outstanding at August 17, 2004 |
|
Common stock. $.01 par value | 569,169,063 |
1
CIENA CORPORATION
INDEX
FORM 10-Q
PAGE NUMBER | ||||
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||
Item 1. Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements |
||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations quarters and nine months ended July 31, 2003 and July 31, 2004 |
3 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets October 31, 2003 and July 31, 2004 |
4 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows nine months ended July 31, 2003 and July 31, 2004 |
5 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
6 | |||
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
17 | |||
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
39 | |||
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
39 | |||
PART II OTHER INFORMATION |
||||
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
40 | |||
Item 2. Changes in Securities and use of Proceeds |
41 | |||
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
41 | |||
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
41 | |||
Item 5. Other Information |
41 | |||
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K |
41 | |||
Signatures |
42 |
2
Item 1. Financial Statements
CIENA CORPORATION
Quarter Ended |
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
July 31, | July 31, | July 31, | July 31, | |||||||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
|||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Products |
$ | 59,294 | $ | 64,340 | $ | 183,914 | $ | 181,436 | ||||||||
Services |
9,184 | 11,249 | 28,578 | 35,266 | ||||||||||||
Total revenue |
68,478 | 75,589 | 212,492 | 216,702 | ||||||||||||
Costs: |
||||||||||||||||
Products |
39,194 | 48,069 | 119,177 | 138,918 | ||||||||||||
Services |
12,749 | 8,723 | 42,300 | 30,212 | ||||||||||||
Total cost of goods sold |
51,943 | 56,792 | 161,477 | 169,130 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
16,535 | 18,797 | 51,015 | 47,572 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Research and development
(exclusive of stock compensation costs below) |
47,963 | 57,762 | 153,890 | 151,418 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing (exclusive of stock compensation costs below) |
24,536 | 29,468 | 76,804 | 80,011 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative
(exclusive of stock compensation costs below) |
7,969 | 6,969 | 30,741 | 20,052 | ||||||||||||
Stock compensation costs: |
||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
2,932 | 1,860 | 10,136 | 5,473 | ||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
687 | 1,214 | 2,122 | 2,147 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative |
312 | 879 | 1,032 | 1,079 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
4,479 | 12,667 | 11,454 | 19,458 | ||||||||||||
In-process research and development |
1,500 | 30,200 | 1,500 | 30,200 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring costs |
15,527 | 13,547 | 18,251 | 22,125 | ||||||||||||
Long-lived asset impairments |
| 7,217 | | 7,217 | ||||||||||||
Recovery of sale, export, use tax liabilities and payments |
| (3,457 | ) | | (5,388 | ) | ||||||||||
Recovery of doubtful accounts, net |
| | | (2,794 | ) | |||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
105,905 | 158,326 | 305,930 | 330,998 | ||||||||||||
Loss from operations |
(89,370 | ) | (139,529 | ) | (254,915 | ) | (283,426 | ) | ||||||||
Interest and other income, net |
8,865 | 4,936 | 33,297 | 18,228 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(8,070 | ) | (6,469 | ) | (28,334 | ) | (20,326 | ) | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on equity investments, net |
| (200 | ) | (10 | ) | 393 | ||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
| | (20,606 | ) | (8,216 | ) | ||||||||||
Loss before income taxes |
(88,575 | ) | (141,262 | ) | (270,568 | ) | (293,347 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
299 | 205 | 909 | 1,044 | ||||||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (88,874 | ) | $ | (141,467 | ) | $ | (271,477 | ) | $ | (294,391 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted net loss per common share and dilutive potential
common share |
$ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.62 | ) | $ | (0.58 | ) | ||||
Weighted average basic common and dilutive potential
common shares outstanding |
451,009 | 566,234 | 438,133 | 504,812 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
CIENA CORPORATION
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2003 |
2004 |
|||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 309,665 | $ | 255,730 | ||||
Short-term investments |
796,809 | 358,369 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
43,600 | 49,821 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
44,995 | 49,836 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
34,334 | 29,663 | ||||||
Total current assets |
1,229,403 | 743,419 | ||||||
Long-term investments |
519,744 | 732,967 | ||||||
Equipment, furniture and fixtures, net |
114,930 | 77,499 | ||||||
Goodwill |
336,039 | 780,875 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
108,408 | 210,762 | ||||||
Other long-term assets |
69,641 | 67,924 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,378,165 | $ | 2,613,446 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 44,402 | $ | 35,570 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
98,926 | 81,505 | ||||||
Restructuring liabilities |
14,378 | 13,718 | ||||||
Unfavorable lease commitments |
9,380 | 9,857 | ||||||
Income taxes payable |
4,640 | 5,609 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
14,473 | 17,525 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
186,199 | 163,784 | ||||||
Long-term deferred revenue |
14,547 | 16,730 | ||||||
Long-term restructuring liabilities |
52,164 | 43,831 | ||||||
Long-term unfavorable lease commitments |
61,312 | 53,903 | ||||||
Other long-term obligations |
2,698 | 2,826 | ||||||
Convertible notes payable |
730,428 | 690,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
1,047,348 | 971,074 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock par value $0.01; 20,000,000 shares authorized; zero shares
issued and outstanding |
| | ||||||
Common stock par value $0.01; 980,000,000 shares authorized;
473,214,856 and 568,890,725 shares issued and outstanding |
4,732 | 5,689 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
4,861,182 | 5,479,672 | ||||||
Deferred stock compensation |
(9,664 | ) | (17,204 | ) | ||||
Notes receivable from stockholders |
(448 | ) | (401 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
2,447 | (3,561 | ) | |||||
Accumulated deficit |
(3,527,432 | ) | (3,821,823 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,330,817 | 1,642,372 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 2,378,165 | $ | 2,613,446 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
CIENA CORPORATION
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net
loss |
$ | (271,477 | ) | $ | (294,391 | ) | ||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Early extinguishment of
debt |
20,606 | 8,216 | ||||||
Amortization of premium (discount) on marketable
securities |
(6,484 | ) | 21,893 | |||||
Non-cash impairment from equity
transactions |
10 | (393 | ) | |||||
Non-cash portion of restructuring charges and related asset
write-downs |
30,127 | 7,620 | ||||||
Accretion of notes
payable |
5,518 | 599 | ||||||
In-process research and development |
1,500 | 30,200 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization of leasehold
improvements |
61,128 | 52,325 | ||||||
Amortization of intangibles, stock compensation and debt issuance
costs |
29,329 | 33,330 | ||||||
Provision (benefit) for inventory excess and
obsolescence |
(4,158 | ) | 3,026 | |||||
Provision for warranty and other contractual
obligations |
4,417 | 7,179 | ||||||
Provision for doubtful
accounts |
| 284 | ||||||
Changes in assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts
receivable |
(13,152 | ) | (6,505 | ) | ||||
Prepaid expenses and
other |
874 | 13,533 | ||||||
Inventories |
25,210 | (114 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued
liabilities |
(62,291 | ) | (77,793 | ) | ||||
Income taxes
payable |
5,203 | 969 | ||||||
Deferred revenue and other
obligations |
(1,076 | ) | 3,268 | |||||
Net cash used in operating
activities |
(174,716 | ) | (196,754 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Additions to equipment, furniture, fixtures and intellectual
property |
(24,831 | ) | (18,828 | ) | ||||
Maturities of available for sale
securities |
1,056,770 | 686,250 | ||||||
Purchases of available for sale
securities |
(519,708 | ) | (488,832 | ) | ||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash
acquired |
4,159 | 4,864 | ||||||
Minority equity
investments |
| (5,500 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by investing
activities |
516,390 | 177,954 | ||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Net proceeds from (repayment of) other
obligations |
(832 | ) | 72 | |||||
Repayment of convertible subordinated notes
payable |
(140,261 | ) | (49,243 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock |
5,858 | 13,989 | ||||||
Repayment of notes receivable from
stockholders |
1,630 | 47 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing
activities |
(133,605 | ) | (35,135 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents |
208,069 | (53,935 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
period |
377,189 | 309,665 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of
period |
$ | 585,258 | $ | 255,730 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
CIENA CORPORATION
(1) INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The interim financial statements included herein for CIENA Corporation (the Company or CIENA) have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, financial statements included in this report reflect all normal recurring adjustments which the Company considers necessary for the fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods covered and of the financial position of the Company at the date of the interim balance sheet. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to understand the information presented. The operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the entire year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys October 31, 2003 audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2003.
(2) SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Segment Reporting
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 (SFAS 131), Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. SFAS 131 establishes annual and interim reporting standards for operating segments of a company. Effective as of the second quarter of fiscal 2004, CIENA reorganized its operations into multiple operating segments for the purpose of making operating decisions and assessing performance. Those operating segments are as follows: Core Networking Group (CNG); Metro and Enterprise Solutions Group (MESG); Data Networking Group (DNG); and the Services Group. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004 the Broadband Access Group (BBG) was organized from the operations of the Companys May 3, 2004 acquisition of Catena Networks, Inc. and was added as an additional operating segment.
Goodwill
Effective November 1, 2001, CIENA adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142 (SFAS 142), Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and ceased to amortize goodwill. As of July 31, 2004, CIENAs assets include $780.9 million related to goodwill. Prior to the reorganization of the Company into operating segments, the fair value of CIENAs goodwill was tested for impairment on an annual basis, and between annual tests if an event occurred or circumstances changed that would, more likely than not, have reduced the fair value of CIENA on an enterprise level, rather than a segment level, below its carrying value. Due to the Companys reorganization into operating segments, SFAS 142 requires that we assign goodwill to the Companys reporting units. CIENA, has determined its operating segments and reporting units are the same. In accordance with SFAS 142 CIENA will test each reporting units goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. The following table summarizes the assignment and changes in the carrying amount of the Companys goodwill to its reporting units as of July 31, 2004 (in thousands):
CNG |
MESG |
DNG |
BBG |
TOTAL |
||||||||||||||||
Assignment as of January 31, 2004 |
$ | 151,121 | $ | 97,924 | $ | 86,873 | $ | | $ | 335,918 | ||||||||||
Goodwill acquired |
| 120,574 | | 326,241 | 446,815 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase adjustments |
| | (1,858 | ) | | (1,858 | ) | |||||||||||||
Impairment losses |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Balance as July 31, 2004 |
$ | 151,121 | $ | 218,498 | $ | 85,015 | $ | 326,241 | $ | 780,875 | ||||||||||
6
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
The Company accounts for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets such as equipment, furniture, fixtures, and other intangible assets in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 144 (SFAS 144), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long Lived Assets. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004 the Company recorded impairment losses of $7.2 million primarily related to excess research and development test equipment classified as held for sale.
Pro Forma Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has elected to continue to account for its stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of APB 25 as interpreted by FASB Interpretation No. 44 (FIN 44), Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation, an Interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25.
Had compensation cost for the Companys stock option plans and employee stock purchase plan been determined based on the Black-Scholes valuation method and the fair value at the grant date for awards in the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2003 and 2004 been determined consistent with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123 (SFAS 123), Accounting for Stock Based Compensation as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 148 (SFAS 148), Accounting for Stock Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, the Companys net loss and net loss per share for the third quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2003 and 2004 would have changed by the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share data):
Quarter ended July 31, |
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
|||||||||||||
Net loss applicable
to common
stockholders as
reported |
$ | (88,874 | ) | $ | (141,467 | ) | $ | (271,477 | ) | $ | (294,391 | ) | ||||
Deduct: Total
stock-based
employee
compensation
expense determined
under fair value
based method for
all awards, net of
related tax
effects |
(19,647 | ) | 7,220 | 29,105 | 29,006 | |||||||||||
Add: Stock-based
employee
compensation
expense included in
reported net
income, net of
related tax
effects |
3,931 | 3,953 | 13,290 | 8,699 | ||||||||||||
Net loss applicable
to common
stockholders pro
forma |
$ | (65,296 | ) | $ | (144,734 | ) | $ | (287,292 | ) | $ | (314,698 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted
net loss per share
as
reported |
$ | (0.20 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.62 | ) | $ | (0.58 | ) | ||||
Basic and diluted
net loss per share
pro
forma |
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | (0.26 | ) | $ | (0.66 | ) | $ | (0.62 | ) | ||||
The above pro forma disclosures are not necessarily representative of the effects on reported net income or loss for future years.
(3) BUSINESS COMBINATIONS
On May 3, 2004, the Company acquired Catena Networks and Internet Photonics. As a result of these acquisitions, the Company recorded charges for in-process research and development and recorded intangible assets related to existing technology, customer relationships, customer contracts and customer order backlog.
In-process research and development represents in-process technology that, as of the date of the acquisition, has not reached technological feasibility and has no alternative future use. The value of such technology is determined by estimating the net cash flows from the sale of the products resulting from the completion of the development projects, reduced by the portion of the revenue attributable to developed technology and the percentage of completion of the project. The resulting cash flows are then discounted back to their present values at appropriate discount rates.
Existing technology represents purchased technology for which development had been completed as of the date of acquisition. This amount is determined using the income approach. This method consisted of estimating future net cash flows attributable to existing technology for a discrete projection period and discounting the net cash flows to their present value. The existing technology will be amortized over its useful life.
The purchase price for the Companys acquisitions is based on the average closing price of CIENAs common stock for the two trading days prior to, the date of, and the two trading days after the announcement of the acquisitions. The announcement date for both the Catena and Internet Photonics acquisitions was February 19, 2004.
7
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of the acquisitions (in thousands):
Internet | ||||||||
Catena |
Photonics |
|||||||
Cash, cash equivalents, long and short-term investments |
$ | 12,936 | $ | 767 | ||||
Inventory |
6,254 | 1,499 | ||||||
Equipment, furniture and fixtures |
2,813 | 1,287 | ||||||
Other tangible assets |
9,236 | 1,666 | ||||||
Existing technology |
73,000 | 10,000 | ||||||
Non-compete agreements |
| 2,200 | ||||||
Contracts, customer relationships and purchase orders |
18,000 | 21,100 | ||||||
Goodwill |
326,241 | 120,574 | ||||||
Deferred stock compensation |
16,130 | 1,094 | ||||||
Other assumed liabilities |
(23,150 | ) | (6,857 | ) | ||||
Unfavorable lease commitments |
(351 | ) | | |||||
Promissory notes and loans |
| (9,357 | ) | |||||
In-process research and development |
25,000 | 5,200 | ||||||
Total purchase price |
$ | 466,109 | $ | 149,173 | ||||
Catena Networks
Catena was a privately held corporation headquartered in Ottawa, Ontario. Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement, Catena merged into CIENA, and the outstanding shares of Catena common and preferred stock were exchanged for approximately 67,773,442 shares of CIENA common stock. The aggregate purchase price was $466.1 million, which included CIENA common stock valued at $407.2 million, CIENA options, warrants and restricted stock valued at $53.7 million, and transaction costs of $5.2 million.
The $73.0 million assigned to existing technology will be amortized over 6.5 years. The $18.0 million assigned to the contracts, customer relationships and purchase orders will be amortized over periods ranging from 3 months to 4.5 years.
The goodwill allocated to the purchase price was $326.2 million and is not deductible for tax purposes. The operations of Catena were incorporated into the Companys BBG operating segment, and accordingly the goodwill from this transaction has been assigned to this operating segment.
The following unaudited pro forma data summarizes the results of operations for the period indicated as if the Catena acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of the periods presented. The unaudited pro forma data gives effect to the combined actual operating results prior to the May 3, 2004 acquisition, adjusted to include the pro forma effect of amortization of intangibles and deferred stock compensation costs. These pro forma amounts do not purport to be indicative of the results that would have actually been obtained if the acquisition occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented or that may be obtained in the future (in thousands, except per share data.)
Quarter Ended |
Nine Months Ended |
|||||||||||||||
July 31, 2003 |
July 31, 2004 |
July 31, 2003 |
July 31, 2004 |
|||||||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 81,485 | $ | 75,589 | $ | 233,372 | $ | 266,938 | ||||||||
Net loss |
$ | (97,609 | ) | $ | (141,467 | ) | $ | (306,458 | ) | $ | (306,734 | ) | ||||
Diluted net loss per common share and dilutive potential common share |
$ | (0.19 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.61 | ) | $ | (0.56 | ) | ||||
Internet Photonics
Internet Photonics was a privately held corporation headquartered in Shrewsbury, New Jersey. Pursuant to the terms of the acquisition agreement, Internet Photonics merged into CIENA, and the outstanding shares of Internet Photonics common and preferred stock were exchanged for approximately 22,623,313 shares of CIENA common stock. The aggregate purchase price was $149.2 million, which included CIENA common stock valued at $139.4 million, CIENA options, warrants and restricted stock valued at $6.1 million, and transaction costs of $3.7 million.
The $10.0 million assigned to existing technology will be amortized over 6.5 years. The $2.2 million assigned to non-compete agreements will be amortized over 12 months. The $21.1 million assigned to the contracts, customer relationships and purchase orders will be amortized over periods ranging from 3 months to 6.5 years. The $9.4 million assigned to the value of the loan was based upon the present value of the loan at the time of the acquisition. The loan was payable to CIENA and was eliminated during the allocation of the purchase price.
8
The goodwill allocated to the purchase price was $120.6 million and is not deductible for tax purposes. The operations of Internet Photonics were incorporated into the Companys MESG operating segment, and accordingly the goodwill from this transaction has been assigned to this operating segment. The operations of Internet Photonics are not material to the consolidated financial statements of the Company, and accordingly, separate pro forma financial information has not been presented.
(4) RESTRUCTURING COSTS
The Company has previously taken actions to align its workforce, facilities and operating costs with business operations. Prior to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 146 (SFAS 146), Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, for transactions initiated after December 31, 2002, CIENA followed the guidance of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3 (EITF 94-3), Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring), for restructuring charges. However, given the manner in which CIENA undertook such restructuring activities, there have been no significant differences in financial reporting. The Company historically has committed to a plan and incurred the liability concurrently meeting the criteria of both EITF 94-3 and SFAS 146 consistently. The following table displays the activity and balances of the restructuring reserve account for the period ended July 31, 2004 (in thousands):
Liabilities recorded | ||||||||||||||||
in connection with | ||||||||||||||||
Workforce | Consolidation of | purchase | ||||||||||||||
reduction |
excess facilities |
combination |
Total |
|||||||||||||
Balance at October 31, 2002 |
$ | 5,199 | $ | 87,845 | $ | 121 | $ | 93,165 | ||||||||
Additional reserve
recorded |
12,240 | (a) | 19,748 | (a) | 430 | (b) | 32,418 | |||||||||
Adjustments to previous estimates |
(523 | )(a) | (310 | )(a) | | (833 | ) | |||||||||
Non-cash
charges |
(1,913 | ) | (28,485 | )(d) | | (30,398 | ) | |||||||||
Cash
payments |
(12,154 | ) | (15,105 | ) | (551 | ) | (27,810 | ) | ||||||||
Balance at October 31, 2003 |
$ | 2,849 | $ | 63,693 | $ | | $ | 66,542 | ||||||||
Additional reserve
recorded |
16,411 | (c) | 2,059 | (c) | | 18,470 | ||||||||||
Adjustments to previous estimates |
154 | (c) | 3,501 | (c) | | 3,655 | ||||||||||
Cash
payments |
(16,471 | ) | (14,647 | ) | | (31,118 | ) | |||||||||
Balance at July 31, 2004 |
$ | 2,943 | $ | 54,606 | $ | | $ | 57,549 | ||||||||
Current restructuring
liabilities |
$ | 2,943 | $ | 10,775 | $ | | $ | 13,718 | ||||||||
Non-current restructuring
liabilities |
$ | | $ | 43,831 | $ | | $ | 43,831 | ||||||||
(a) | During the second quarter of fiscal 2003, CIENA reduced its workforce by approximately 75 employees. CIENA recorded a restructuring charge of $2.7 million associated with the workforce reduction. | |||
During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, CIENA recorded a restructuring charge of $15.5 million associated with a workforce reduction of approximately 84 employees, lease terminations, non-cancelable lease costs and the write-down of certain property, equipment and leasehold improvements. | ||||
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2003, CIENA recorded a restructuring charge of $12.9 million associated with a workforce reduction of approximately 231 employees, lease termination, non-cancelable lease costs and the write-down of certain property, equipment and leasehold improvements. | ||||
(b) | During the third quarter of fiscal 2003, CIENA and WaveSmith Networks, Inc., which CIENA acquired in that quarter, reduced their combined workforce by 8 employees. Approximately $0.4 million of cost associated with the WaveSmith workforce reduction qualify for treatment under EITF 95-3 Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase Combination and were recorded as an element of the acquisition. | |||
(c) | During the first quarter of fiscal 2004, CIENA incurred charges of $1.3 million related to the exit of a warehouse, $1.4 million related to work force reductions of approximately 52 employees and $0.7 million related to an adjustment to previous estimates. | |||
During the second quarter of fiscal 2004, CIENA recorded a restructuring charge of $2.5 million related to a workforce reduction of approximately 68 employees and $2.6 million related to an adjustment to previous estimates. | ||||
During the third quarter of fiscal 2004, CIENA recorded a restructuring charge of $12.5 million related to a workforce reduction of approximately 321 employees, $0.7 million related to exit activities of the Companys San Jose facility and an adjustment of $0.3 million related to an estimate of previously restructured facilities. | ||||
(d) | Non-cash charges during fiscal 2003 include the disposal of previously reserved property and equipment. |
9
The Company expects to incur additional restructuring costs, accelerated amortization of leasehold costs and asset impairment costs of between $40.0 million and $50.0 million associated with the anticipated September 30, 2004, closing of its San Jose, California facility.
(5) MARKETABLE DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
Cash, short-term and long-term investments are comprised of the following (in thousands):
July 31, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated Fair | ||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
Value |
|||||||||||||
Corporate
bonds |
$ | 383,390 | $ | 5 | $ | 1,310 | $ | 382,085 | ||||||||
Asset backed
obligations |
222,197 | 64 | 163 | 222,098 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
paper |
8,000 | | 8 | 7,992 | ||||||||||||
US government
obligations |
480,863 | 5 | 1,707 | 479,161 | ||||||||||||
Money market
funds |
255,730 | | | 255,730 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,350,180 | $ | 74 | $ | 3,188 | $ | 1,347,066 | |||||||||
Included in cash
and cash
equivalents |
255,730 | | | 255,730 | ||||||||||||
Included in
short-term
investments |
358,987 | 74 | 692 | 358,369 | ||||||||||||
Included in
long-term
investments |
735,463 | | 2,496 | 732,967 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,350,180 | $ | 74 | $ | 3,188 | $ | 1,347,066 | |||||||||
October 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Estimated Fair | ||||||||||||||
Amortized Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
Value |
|||||||||||||
Corporate
bonds |
$ | 617,837 | $ | 787 | $ | 163 | $ | 618,461 | ||||||||
Asset-backed
obligations |
161,474 | 322 | | 161,796 | ||||||||||||
Municipal
bonds |
5,024 | 7 | | 5,031 | ||||||||||||
Commercial
paper |
10,487 | 2 | 28 | 10,461 | ||||||||||||
US government
obligations |
518,609 | 2,095 | 229 | 520,475 | ||||||||||||
Money market
funds |
309,994 | | | 309,994 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,623,425 | $ | 3,213 | $ | 420 | $ | 1,626,218 | |||||||||
Included in cash
and cash
equivalents |
309,665 | | | 309,665 | ||||||||||||
Included in
short-term
investments |
793,807 | 3,012 | 10 | 796,809 | ||||||||||||
Included in
long-term
investments |
519,953 | 201 | 410 | 519,744 | ||||||||||||
$ | 1,623,425 | $ | 3,213 | $ | 420 | $ | 1,626,218 | |||||||||
The following table summarizes maturities of debt investments (including restricted investments) at July 31, 2004 (in thousands):
Estimated Fair | ||||||||
Amortized Cost |
Value |
|||||||
Less than one
year |
$ | 358,987 | $ | 358,369 | ||||
Due in 1-2
years |
735,463 | 732,967 | ||||||
Due in 2-5
years |
| | ||||||
$ | 1,094,450 | $ | 1,091,336 | |||||
(6) ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
As of July 31, 2004, the trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, included one customer who accounted for 28.7% of the trade accounts receivable. As of October 31, 2003, the trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, included three customers who accounted for 23.6%, 12.5% and 10.1% of the net trade accounts receivable, respectively.
10
CIENA performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally has not required collateral or other forms of security from its customers. CIENA maintains an allowance for potential losses on a specific identification basis. During the nine months ended July 31, 2004, the Company recovered $3.1 million from a customer, from which payment was previously deemed doubtful due to the customers financial condition. The Company also recorded an allowance for doubtful accounts during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 of $0.3 million. CIENAs allowance for doubtful accounts as of October 31, 2003 and July 31, 2004 was $1.5 and $1.7 million, respectively.
(7) INVENTORIES
Inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2003 |
2004 |
|||||||
Raw
materials |
$ | 16,121 | $ | 18,182 | ||||
Work-in-process |
5,904 | 3,496 | ||||||
Finished
goods |
46,063 | 49,452 | ||||||
Gross
inventories |
68,088 | 71,130 | ||||||
Reserve for excess and
obsolescence |
(23,093 | ) | (21,294 | ) | ||||
Net
inventories |
$ | 44,995 | $ | 49,836 | ||||
The Company writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. During the nine months ended July 31, 2004, CIENA recorded a provision for inventory reserves of $3.0 million, primarily related to excess inventory due to a change in forecasted sales for certain products. The following is a summary of the change in the reserve for excess inventory and obsolete inventory during the nine months ended July 31, 2004 (in thousands):
Inventory Reserve |
||||
Reserve balance as of Oct. 31,
2003 |
$ | 23,093 | ||
Provision for excess inventory,
net |
3,026 | |||
Actual inventory
scrapped |
(4,825 | ) | ||
Reserve balance as of July 31,
2004 |
$ | 21,294 | ||
During the nine months ended July 31, 2003, the Company recorded a benefit for excess inventory of $4.2 million, primarily related to the realization of sales from previously reserved excess inventory. The following is a summary of the change in the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory during the nine months ended July 31, 2003 (in thousands):
Inventory Reserve |
||||
Reserve balance as of Oct. 31, 2002 |
$ | 48,145 | ||
Benefit for excess inventory |
(4,158 | ) | ||
Actual inventory scrapped |
(16,119 | ) | ||
Reserve balance as of July 31, 2003 |
$ | 27,868 | ||
(8) | EQUIPMENT, FURNITURE AND FIXTURES |
Equipment, furniture and fixtures are comprised of the following (in thousands):
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2003 |
2004 |
|||||||
Equipment, furniture and
fixtures |
$ | 332,843 | $ | 318,014 | ||||
Leasehold
improvements |
70,145 | 70,750 | ||||||
402,988 | 388,764 | |||||||
Accumulated depreciation
and
amortization |
(288,170 | ) | (311,265 | ) | ||||
Construction-in-progress |
112 | | ||||||
$ | 114,930 | $ | 77,499 | |||||
11
During the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and the nine months ended July 31, 2004 CIENA recorded $12.5 million and $14.2 million, respectively, in accelerated amortization expense of leasehold improvements related to the planned exit of the Companys San Jose, California facility. In addition, the Company recorded impairment losses of $7.2 million, primarily related to research and development equipment classified as held for sale in the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The residual carrying value of these assets is insignificant.
(9) OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Other intangible assets are comprised of the following (in thousands):
October 31, 2003 |
July 31, 2004 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Accumulated | Net | Gross | Accumulated | Net | |||||||||||||||||||
Intangible |
Amortization |
Intangible |
Intangible |
Amortization |
Intangible |
|||||||||||||||||||
Existing
technology |
$ | 94,704 | $ | (22,975 | ) | $ | 71,729 | $ | 177,704 | (a) | $ | (34,859 | ) | $ | 142,845 | |||||||||
Patents and
licenses |
36,655 | (8,984 | ) | 27,671 | 37,070 | (11,886 | ) | 25,184 | ||||||||||||||||
Covenants not to
compete,
outstanding
purchase orders and
contracts |
12,700 | (3,692 | ) | 9,008 | 54,000 | (a) | (11,267 | ) | 42,733 | |||||||||||||||
$ | 144,059 | $ | 108,408 | $ | 268,774 | $ | 210,762 | |||||||||||||||||
(a) | As a result of the Internet Photonics and Catena acquisitions, the Company recorded $10.0 million and $73.0 million in existing technology, respectively and $23.3 million from Internet Photonics and $18.0 million from Catena in other intangibles related to covenants not to compete, outstanding purchase orders and contracts. |
The aggregate amortization expense of other intangible assets was $5.4 million and $13.6 million for the quarters ended July 31, 2003 and 2004, respectively. The following table represents the expected future amortization of other intangible assets as follows (in thousands):
2004 (remaining three months) |
$ | 10,050 | ||
2005 |
37,777 | |||
2006 |
36,470 | |||
2007 |
36,470 | |||
2008 |
35,260 | |||
Thereafter |
54,735 | |||
$ | 210,762 | |||
(10) OTHER BALANCE SHEET DETAILS
Other long-term assets (in thousands):
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2003 |
2004 |
|||||||
Maintenance spares inventory,
net |
$ | 26,206 | $ | 20,312 | ||||
Deferred debt issuance
costs |
12,869 | 10,598 | ||||||
Investments in privately held
companies |
21,292 | 26,092 | ||||||
Other |
9,274 | 10,922 | ||||||
$ | 69,641 | $ | 67,924 | |||||
12
Accrued liabilities (in thousands):
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2003 |
2004 |
|||||||
Warranty |
$ | 36,189 | $ | 32,156 | ||||
Accrued compensation, payroll related tax
and benefits |
33,206 | 29,885 | ||||||
Accrued excess inventory purchase
commitments |
1,405 | 825 | ||||||
Accrued interest
payable |
6,583 | | ||||||
Other |
21,543 | 18,639 | ||||||
$ | 98,926 | $ | 81,505 | |||||
The following table summarizes the activity in the Companys accrued warranty for the nine months ended July 31, 2003 and 2004 (in thousands):
Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||||
Nine Months | beginning of | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||
ended July 31, |
period |
Provisions |
Acquisitions |
Settlements |
end of period |
|||||||||||||||
2003 |
$ | 42,040 | 4,417 | | (10,925 | ) | $ | 35,532 | ||||||||||||
2004 |
$ | 36,189 | 7,179 | 1,000 | (12,212 | ) | $ | 32,156 |
Deferred revenue (in thousands):
October 31, | July 31, | |||||||
2003 |
2004 |
|||||||
Products |
$ | 4,772 | $ | 7,307 | ||||
Services |
24,248 | 26,948 | ||||||
Total deferred revenue |
29,020 | 34,255 | ||||||
Less current portion |
(14,473 | ) | (17,525 | ) | ||||
Long-term deferred revenue |
$ | 14,547 | $ | 16,730 | ||||
(11) CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE
On December 19, 2003, CIENA purchased the remaining $48.2 million of the outstanding of the ONI Systems Corp. convertible subordinated notes. The Company paid $49.2 million for notes with a cumulative accreted book value of $41.0 million, which resulted in a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $8.2 million.
(12) EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE CALCULATION
Basic EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, stock options and warrants using the treasury stock method. Approximately 35.8 million and 57.5 million options and unvested restricted stock were outstanding during the third quarters of fiscal 2003 and 2004 respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Approximately 37.0 million and 42.3 million options and unvested restricted stock were outstanding during the first nine months of fiscal 2003 and 2004 respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS as the effect would be anti-dilutive.
(13) COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
The components of comprehensive loss are as follows (in thousands):
Quarter ended July 31, |
Nine months ended July 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
|||||||||||||
Net
loss |
$ | (88,874 | ) | $ | (141,467 | ) | $ | (271,477 | ) | $ | (294,391 | ) | ||||
Change in
unrealized loss on
available-for-sale
securities, net of
tax |
(4,353 | ) | (2,702 | ) | (5,684 | ) | (5,906 | ) | ||||||||
Change in
accumulated
translation
adjustments |
44 | (26 | ) | 246 | (102 | ) | ||||||||||
Total comprehensive
loss |
$ | (93,183 | ) | $ | (144,195 | ) | $ | (276,915 | ) | $ | (300,399 | ) | ||||
13
(14) SEGMENT REPORTING
Effective as of the second quarter of fiscal 2004, CIENA reorganized its operations into multiple operating segments for the purpose of making operating decisions and assessing performance. Those operating segments are the following: Core Networking Group (CNG); Metro and Enterprise Solutions Group (MESG); Data Networking Group (DNG); and the Services Group. Each operating group includes products for sale to external customers, the related research and development and product line management. CNG incorporates CIENAs core transport product, core switching product and related LightWorks On-Center management software. MESG incorporates CIENAs metropolitan transport, metropolitan switching, storage extension, and the related management software. DNG incorporates CIENAs multiservice networking product lines, related management software and products manufactured by Laurel Networks, Inc., that are resold by CIENA.
On May 3, 2004, CIENA completed the acquisitions of Catena Networks and Internet Photonics. Internet Photonics was incorporated into MESG, and Catena formed a new operating segment, the Broadband Access Group (BBG).
CIENAs geographic distribution of revenue for the quarter and nine months ended July 31, 2003 and 2004 are as follows (in thousands):
Quarter Ended July 31, |
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
% |
2004 |
% |
2003 |
% |
2004 |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 41,342 | 60.4 | $ | 61,231 | 81.0 | $ | 136,415 | 64.2 | $ | 156,547 | 72.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||
International |
27,136 | 39.6 | 14,358 | 19.0 | 76,077 | 35.8 | 60,155 | 27.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 68,478 | 100.0 | $ | 75,589 | 100.0 | $ | 212,492 | 100.0 | $ | 216,702 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CIENAs revenue derived from products and services for the quarter and nine months ended July 31, 2003 and 2004 are as follows (in thousands):
Quarter Ended July 31, |
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
% |
2004 |
% |
2003 |
% |
2004 |
% |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Products |
$ | 59,294 | 86.6 | $ | 64,340 | 85.1 | $ | 183,914 | 86.6 | $ | 181,436 | 83.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Services |
9,184 | 13.4 | 11,249 | 14.9 | 28,578 | 13.4 | 35,266 | 16.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 68,478 | 100.0 | $ | 75,589 | 100.0 | $ | 212,492 | 100.0 | $ | 216,702 | 100.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
During the quarter and nine months ended July 31, 2003 and 2004, customers who each accounted for at least 10% of CIENAs revenue during the respective periods are as follows (in thousands):
Quarter Ended July 31, |
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%** |
2004 |
%** |
2003 |
%** |
2004 |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company A |
$ | * | | $ | * | | $ | 31,217 | 14.7 | $ | * | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Company B |
6,904 | 10.1 | * | | 26,250 | 12.4 | * | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company C |
8,910 | 13.0 | * | | * | | * | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company D |
* | | 12,458 | 16.5 | * | | 40,284 | 18.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Company E |
* | | 7,933 | 10.5 | * | | * | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 15,814 | 23.1 | $ | 20,391 | 27.0 | $ | 57,467 | 27.1 | $ | 40,284 | 18.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
* | Denotes revenue recognized less than 10% of total revenue for the period. | |
** | Denotes % of total revenue |
14
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Third Quarter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
CNG |
$ | 25,737 | 37.6 | $ | 20,719 | 27.4 | $ | (5,018 | ) | (19.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
MESG |
28,351 | 41.4 | 21,521 | 28.5 | (6,830 | ) | (24.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
DNG |
5,206 | 7.6 | 7,138 | 9.4 | 1,932 | 37.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
BBG |
| 0.0 | 14,962 | 19.8 | 14,962 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
Services |
9,184 | 13.4 | 11,249 | 14.9 | 2,064 | 22.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated revenue |
$ | 68,478 | 100.0 | $ | 75,589 | 100.0 | $ | 7,111 | 10.4 | |||||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
First Nine Months Ending July 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
CNG |
$ | 93,750 | 44.1 | $ | 95,349 | 44.0 | $ | 1,599 | 1.7 | |||||||||||||||
MESG |
84,958 | 40.0 | 57,286 | 26.4 | (27,672 | ) | (32.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
DNG |
5,206 | 2.5 | 13,839 | 6.4 | 8,633 | 165.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
BBG |
| 0.0 | 14,962 | 6.9 | 14,962 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
Services |
28,578 | 13.4 | 35,266 | 16.3 | 6,688 | 23.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated revenue |
$ | 212,492 | 100.0 | $ | 216,702 | 100.0 | $ | 4,210 | 2.0 | |||||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment profit (loss) and the reconciliation to consolidated net loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Third Quarter |
||||||||||||||||
(Increase) | ||||||||||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
decrease |
%** |
|||||||||||||
Segment profit (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
CNG |
$ | (17,462 | ) | $ | (17,795 | ) | $ | (333 | ) | (1.9 | ) | |||||
MESG |
(13,377 | ) | (12,128 | ) | 1,249 | 9.3 | ||||||||||
DNG |
1,519 | (2,197 | ) | (3,716 | ) | (244.6 | ) | |||||||||
BBG |
| (141 | ) | (141 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Services |
(5,221 | ) | 1,709 | 6,930 | 132.7 | |||||||||||
Total segment profit (loss) |
$ | (34,541 | ) | $ | (30,552 | ) | $ | 3,989 | 11.5 | |||||||
Other non performance items: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate selling and marketing |
(21,423 | ) | (25,377 | ) | (3,954 | ) | (18.5 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate general and administrative |
(7,969 | ) | (6,969 | ) | 1,000 | 12.5 | ||||||||||
Stock compensation costs: |
||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
(2,932 | ) | (1,860 | ) | 1,072 | 36.6 | ||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
(687 | ) | (1,214 | ) | (527 | ) | (76.7 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative |
(312 | ) | (879 | ) | (567 | ) | (181.7 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets |
(4,479 | ) | (12,667 | ) | (8,188 | ) | (182.8 | ) | ||||||||
In-process research and development |
(1,500 | ) | (30,200 | ) | (28,700 | ) | (1,913.3 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring costs |
(15,527 | ) | (13,547 | ) | 1,980 | 12.8 | ||||||||||
Long-lived asset impairments |
| (7,217 | ) | (7,217 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Recovery of sale, export, use tax
liabilities and payments |
| 3,457 | 3,457 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Recovery of doubtful accounts, net |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Accelerated amortization of leasehold |
| (12,504 | ) | (12,504 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Interest and other financial charges, net |
795 | (1,733 | ) | (2,528 | ) | (318.0 | ) | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
(299 | ) | (205 | ) | 94 | 31.4 | ||||||||||
Consolidated net loss |
$ | (88,874 | ) | $ | (141,467 | ) | $ | (52,593 | ) | (59.2 | ) | |||||
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
15
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment profit (loss) and the reconciliation to consolidated net loss for the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
First Nine Months Ending July 31, |
||||||||||||||||
(Increase) | ||||||||||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
decrease |
%** |
|||||||||||||
Segment profit (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
CNG |
$ | (57,982 | ) | $ | (54,211 | ) | $ | 3,771 | 6.5 | |||||||
MESG |
(37,210 | ) | (39,816 | ) | (2,606 | ) | (7.0 | ) | ||||||||
DNG |
1,281 | (9,490 | ) | (10,771 | ) | (840.8 | ) | |||||||||
BBG |
| (374 | ) | (374 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Services |
(17,288 | ) | 3,589 | 20,877 | 120.8 | |||||||||||
Total segment profit (loss) |
$ | (111,199 | ) | $ | (100,302 | ) | $ | 10,897 | 9.8 | |||||||
Other non performance items: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate selling and marketing |
(68,480 | ) | (69,402 | ) | (922 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate general and administrative |
(30,741 | ) | (20,052 | ) | 10,689 | 34.8 | ||||||||||
Stock compensation costs: |
||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
(10,136 | ) | (5,473 | ) | 4,663 | 46.0 | ||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
(2,122 | ) | (2,147 | ) | (25 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative |
(1,032 | ) | (1,079 | ) | (47 | ) | (4.6 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets |
(11,454 | ) | (19,458 | ) | (8,004 | ) | (69.9 | ) | ||||||||
In-process research and development |
(1,500 | ) | (30,200 | ) | (28,700 | ) | (1,913.3 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring costs |
(18,251 | ) | (22,125 | ) | (3,874 | ) | (21.2 | ) | ||||||||
Long-lived asset impairments |
| (7,217 | ) | (7,217 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Recovery of sale, export, use tax
liabilities and payments |
| 5,388 | 5,388 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Recovery of doubtful accounts, net |
| 2,794 | 2,794 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Accelerated amortization of leasehold |
| (14,153 | ) | (14,153 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Interest and other financial charges, net |
(15,653 | ) | (9,921 | ) | 5,732 | 36.6 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
(909 | ) | (1,044 | ) | (135 | ) | (14.9 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated net loss |
$ | (271,477 | ) | $ | (294,391 | ) | $ | (22,914 | ) | (8.4 | ) | |||||
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
Segment profit (loss) is determined based on internal performance measures used by the Chief Executive Officer to assess the performance of each operating segment in a given period. In connection with that assessment, the Chief Executive Officer excludes the following other non performance items: corporate selling and marketing; corporate general and administrative costs; stock compensation; amortization of intangibles; in-process research and development; restructuring costs; long-lived asset impairment; recovery of sale, export and use taxes; provisions or recovery of doubtful accounts; accelerated amortization of leaseholds; interest income, interest expense, equity investment gains or losses, gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, and provisions for income taxes.
(15) CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
On October 3, 2000, Stanford University and Litton Systems filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging that optical fiber amplifiers incorporated into CIENAs products infringe U.S. Patent No. 4,859,016 (the `016 Patent). The complaint seeks injunctive relief, royalties and damages. We believe that we have valid defenses to the lawsuit and intend to defend it vigorously. On October 10, 2003, the court stayed the case pending final resolution of matters before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO), including a request for and disposition of a reexamination of the 016 Patent. On October 16, 2003, the PTO granted reexamination of the 016 Patent, thus resulting in a continuation of the stay of the case.
On July 19, 2000, CIENA and CIENA Properties, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of CIENA, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware requesting damages and injunctive relief against Corvis Corporation (Corvis). The suit charged Corvis with infringing four patents relating to CIENAs optical
16
networking communication systems and technology. A jury trial to determine whether Corvis is infringing these patents commenced on February 10, 2003. On February 24, 2003, the jury decided that Corvis was infringing one of the patents and not infringing two others. The jury was deadlocked with respect to infringement on the fourth patent. This trial was immediately followed by a trial on Corvis affirmative defenses based on the validity of two of the patents. On February 28, 2003, the jury in this trial determined that the patents were valid. In April 2003, following a third trial, another jury decided that Corvis had infringed the fourth patent on which the previous jury had deadlocked. Based on these favorable verdicts collectively holding that Corvis is infringing two valid CIENA patents, CIENA has moved for an injunction to prohibit the manufacture, sale or use by Corvis of the infringing products. The court has not yet ruled on this motion.
As a result of the merger with ONI Systems Corp., we became a defendant in a securities class action lawsuit. Beginning in August 2001, a number of substantially identical class action complaints alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. These complaints name ONI, Hugh C. Martin, ONIs former chairman, president and chief executive officer; Chris A. Davis, ONIs former executive vice president, chief financial officer and administrative officer; and certain underwriters of ONIs initial public offering as defendants. The complaints were consolidated into a single action, and a consolidated amended complaint was filed on April 24, 2002. The amended complaint alleges, among other things, that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws by failing to disclose alleged compensation arrangements (such as undisclosed commissions or stock stabilization practices) in the initial public offerings registration statement and by engaging in manipulative practices to artificially inflate the price of ONIs common stock after the initial public offering. The amended complaint also alleges that ONI and the named former officers violated the securities laws on the basis of an alleged failure to disclose the underwriters alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. No specific amount of damages has been claimed. Similar complaints have been filed against more than 300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998, and all of these actions have been included in a single coordinated proceeding. Mr. Martin and Ms. Davis have been dismissed from the action without prejudice pursuant to a tolling agreement. In July 2004, following mediated settlement negotiations, the plaintiffs, the issuer defendants (including CIENA), and their insurers entered into a settlement agreement, whereby the plaintiffs cases against the issuers are to be dismissed. This settlement is subject to court approval. The settling parties have moved the court for approval of the settlement, which motion has been opposed by the underwriter defendants.
As a result of the merger with ONI, we also became a defendant in two substantially identical purported class actions on behalf of ONI security holders originally brought against ONI and members of its board of directors. The complaints allege that the director defendants breached their fiduciary duties to ONI in approving the merger with CIENA and seek declaratory, injunctive and other relief permitted by equity. The plaintiffs failed to obtain an injunction against completion of the merger. The first of these cases was filed on February 20, 2002, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo, and is encaptioned K.W. Sams, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. ONI Systems Corporation, et al. The second case was brought on March 19, 2002, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, and is encaptioned Steven Myeary, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. ONI Systems Corporation. On April 14, 2003, the plaintiffs in these cases filed a consolidated amended complaint and named four additional defendants: CIENA Corporation, James F. Jordan, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and Mohr Davidow Ventures. CIENA and the other defendants subsequently filed a demurrer and served a motion for sanctions on plaintiffs based on factual inaccuracies in the consolidated amended complaint. In response, the plaintiffs filed a corrected consolidated amended complaint, the demurrer to which was sustained by the court in April 2004 with leave to amend. In August 2004, the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss these lawsuits with prejudice.
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Under the heading Risk Factors, we have described what we believe to be some of the major risks related to these forward-looking statements, as well as the general outlook for our business. Investors should review these risk factors and the rest of this quarterly report in combination with the more detailed description of our business in our annual report on Form 10-K, which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 11, 2003, for a more complete understanding of the risks associated with an investment in the Companys Common Stock.
17
Overview
CIENA is a leading global provider of innovative network solutions. Our existing and potential customers include:
| communications carriers including regional Bell operating companies (RBOCs), independent operating companies (IOCs), competitive local exchange carriers (CLECs), long-distance carriers, wireless carriers and wholesale carriers; | |||
| other communications service providers including cable operators and Internet service providers; | |||
| enterprises including large businesses, educational and non-profit institutions; | |||
| federal, state and local governments; and | |||
| integrators and resellers. |
In early 2001, the telecommunications industry began a severe decline, and our dominant customer base, communications carriers, responded by curtailing network build-outs and reducing their overall capital expenses. As a result, the market for our core networking products declined sharply. After several years of significantly lower capital spending, most carriers operating costs remain high while their revenue is growing slowly, if at all.
In this environment, we expect that most major carriers will hold their aggregate capital spending flat for the next several years. Nevertheless, we believe that carriers, other communications service providers, enterprises and governments will make significant investments in next-generation equipment, particularly equipment that resides at the edge of communications networks and enables the creation and delivery of new high-bandwidth data services. As a result, we have undertaken a number of efforts to expand our addressable market, including making acquisitions, establishing partnerships with other equipment suppliers and investing internal resources towards developing, marketing and selling products that address this broader market. The success of these efforts will, in most cases, depend on our ability to increase our market share in the new markets we are entering.
As part of our strategy to increase our addressable market, we completed the acquisitions of Catena Networks and Internet Photonics on May 3, 2004. Catenas broadband access solutions enable the delivery of traditional plain old telephone service (POTS), digital subscriber line service (DSL), video services, and voice-over-IP (VoIP) from a single, integrated platform. Prior to the acquisition, Catenas customers included RBOCs, major IOCs and CLECs. Internet Photonics has sold its carrier-grade optical Ethernet transport and switching solutions to several large cable providers and carriers who use Internet Photonics solutions to deploy Ethernet private-line services. The broadband access markets served by both Catena and Internet Photonics products are expected to benefit as service providers shift spending to target the access portions of their networks to enable increased residential access to high-bandwidth services such as DSL, video-on-demand and high definition television (HDTV).
As a result of the Catena and Internet Photonics acquisitions, we incurred increased costs for product development and sales and marketing activities. In addition, we incurred costs associated with these acquisitions related to amortization of purchased intangible assets, in-process research and development and deferred stock compensation.
Our strategy also includes reducing our ongoing operating expenses in order to better align them with our market opportunities and changing product mix. On April 20, 2004, we announced our intention to close our San Jose, California facility by September 30, 2004. During the third quarter of fiscal 2004 we incurred restructuring costs of $13.5 million, primarily related to work force reductions, accelerated leasehold improvement amortization costs of $12.5 million and equipment impairment costs of $7.2 million associated with our San Jose closing activities and our other ongoing efforts to reduce our operating costs. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 we expect to incur additional restructuring costs, accelerated amortization of leasehold cost and equipment impairment costs of between $40.0 million and $50.0 million associated with the San Jose, California facility closing and other restructuring activities.
We reported revenue of $75.6 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2004. This was a slight increase from the second quarter of fiscal 2004 and 10.4% increase from the third quarter of fiscal 2003. We had expected revenue for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 to increase by as much as 30% from the second quarter of fiscal 2004, primarily as a result of the inclusion of revenue from Catena and Internet Photonics products for the first time. The difference between our actual revenue and our previous expectations was due to the ongoing environment of uncertainty resulting in cautious spending and deployment delays by our large service provider customers, including a deceleration of orders for Catenas products. We expect revenue for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 will be approximately flat to that recognized in our third quarter of fiscal 2004.
18
As of July 31, 2004, CIENA had 1,743 employees, which was a net gain of 41 employees from the 1,702 employees on April 30, 2004. We expect to reduce our headcount by an additional 70 employees related to the exiting of the San Jose, California facility.
Results of Operations
Three months ended July 31, 2003 compared to three months ended July 31, 2004
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Third Quarter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Products |
$ | 59,294 | 86.6 | $ | 64,340 | 85.1 | $ | 5,046 | 8.5 | |||||||||||||||
Services |
9,184 | 13.4 | 11,249 | 14.9 | 2,065 | 22.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total revenue |
68,478 | 100.0 | 75,589 | 100.0 | 7,111 | 10.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Products |
39,194 | 57.2 | 48,069 | 63.6 | 8,875 | 22.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Services |
12,749 | 18.6 | 8,723 | 11.5 | (4,026 | ) | (31.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total cost of goods sold |
51,943 | 75.8 | 56,792 | 75.1 | 4,849 | 9.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 16,535 | 24.2 | $ | 18,797 | 24.9 | $ | 2,262 | 13.7 | |||||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Third Quarter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Product revenue |
$ | 59,294 | 100.0 | $ | 64,340 | 100.0 | $ | 5,046 | 8.5 | |||||||||||||||
Product cost of goods sold |
39,194 | 66.1 | 48,069 | 74.7 | 8,875 | 22.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Product gross profit |
$ | 20,100 | 33.9 | $ | 16,271 | 25.3 | $ | (3,829 | ) | 19.0 | ||||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of product revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in service revenue, service cost of goods sold and service gross profit (loss) from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Third Quarter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Service revenue |
$ | 9,184 | 100.0 | $ | 11,249 | 100.0 | $ | 2,065 | 22.5 | |||||||||||||||
Service cost of goods sold |
12,749 | 138.8 | 8,723 | 77.6 | (4,026 | ) | (31.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Service gross profit (loss) |
$ | (3,565 | ) | (38.8 | ) | $ | 2,526 | 22.4 | $ | 6,091 | 170.9 | |||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of service revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
19
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenues from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Third Quarter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 41,342 | 60.4 | $ | 61,231 | 81.0 | $ | 19,889 | 48.1 | |||||||||||||||
International
|
27,136 | 39.6 | 14,358 | 19.0 | (12,778 | ) | (47.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 68,478 | 100.0 | $ | 75,589 | 100.0 | $ | 7,111 | 10.4 | |||||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
Historically, we have relied on a limited number of customers for a substantial portion of our revenue. During the third quarter of fiscal 2003 and third quarter of fiscal 2004, certain customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenues during the respective periods as follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
Third Quarter |
||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%** |
2004 |
%** |
|||||||||||||
Company B |
$ | 6,904 | 10.1 | $ | * | | ||||||||||
Company C |
8,910 | 13.0 | * | | ||||||||||||
Company D |
* | | 12,458 | 16.5 | ||||||||||||
Company E |
* | | 7,933 | 10.5 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 15,814 | 23.1 | $ | 20,391 | 27.0 | ||||||||||
** | Denotes % of total revenue | |
* | Denotes revenues recognized less than 10% for the period |
Revenue
| Product revenue increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 primarily due to sales of our newly acquired broadband access products and increased sales of our data networking products, partially offset by decreased sales from our core and metropolitan networking products. |
| Service revenue increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 due to increased sales of maintenance contracts. |
| Domestic revenue increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 primarily due to sales of broadband access products, and increased sales of our data networking products, core networking products and maintenance services, partially offset by decreased sales from metropolitan networking products. |
| International revenue decreased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 primarily due to decreased sales of our metropolitan and core networking products. |
Gross profit
Cost of goods sold consists of component costs, direct compensation costs, warranty and other contractual obligations, royalties, license fees, direct technical support costs, cost of excess and obsolete inventory and overhead related to manufacturing, technical support and engineering, furnishing and installation (EF&I) operations.
| Gross profit as a percentage of revenue increased slightly from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 largely due to an increase in margin on our service revenues offset by the sale of lower margin products. |
| Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenue decreased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 largely due to a higher percentage of revenue from core |
20
transport systems and a lower percentage of revenue from core switching systems combined with increased excess and obsolete inventory costs. The decrease in gross profit was partially offset by sales of broadband access products. |
| Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenue increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 largely due to increased sales of maintenance services and reduced service overhead costs. |
Operating expenses
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating expenses from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Third Quarter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 47,963 | 70.0 | $ | 57,762 | 76.4 | $ | 9,799 | 20.4 | |||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
24,536 | 35.8 | 29,468 | 39.0 | 4,932 | 20.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
7,969 | 11.6 | 6,969 | 9.2 | (1,000 | ) | (12.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation costs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
2,932 | 4.3 | 1,860 | 2.5 | (1,072 | ) | (36.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
687 | 1.0 | 1,214 | 1.6 | 527 | 76.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
312 | 0.5 | 879 | 1.2 | 567 | 181.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
4,479 | 6.6 | 12,667 | 16.8 | 8,188 | 182.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
In-process research and
development |
1,500 | 2.2 | 30,200 | 40.0 | 28,700 | 1913.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring
costs |
15,527 | 22.7 | 13,547 | 17.9 | (1,980 | ) | (12.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Long-lived asset impairment |
7,217 | 9.5 | 7,217 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recovery of sale, export, use tax
liabilities and
payments |
| | (3,457 | ) | (4.6 | ) | (3,457 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 105,905 | 154.7 | $ | 158,326 | 209.5 | $ | 52,421 | 49.5 | |||||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
| Research and development expense increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 due to accelerated leasehold improvements amortization costs of $12.5 million associated with the planned closing of our San Jose, California facility. Excluding the accelerated amortization, research and development expense decreased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 due to reductions in depreciation expense, prototype parts, facility-related costs and employee-related costs. |
| Selling and marketing expense increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 due to higher costs related to an increase in the number of sales and marketing employees and increases in tradeshow and marketing activities partially offset by reductions in depreciation expense. |
| General and administrative expense decreased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 primarily due to decreases in legal costs, consulting and outside service expense, and employee-related costs. |
| Stock compensation costs increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 due to the higher level of unvested stock options and restricted stock assumed as part of our various acquisitions. As of July 31, 2004, the balance of deferred stock compensation, presented as a reduction of stockholders equity, was $17.2 million. |
| Amortization of intangible assets costs increased from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004 due to higher amounts of purchased intangible assets, such as developed technology and customer relationships resulting from our acquisitions of Catena and Internet Photonics. |
| Restructuring costs incurred during the third quarter of 2004 were related to work force reductions of approximately 321 employees. These actions were taken as part of our efforts to reduce our costs. We expect to incur additional restructuring costs in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. |
| In-process research and development (IPR&D) costs represents the estimated value of purchased in-process technology that had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use at the time of the acquisition. In the third quarter of fiscal 2003 all of the recorded IPR&D was from our WaveSmith acquisition. In the third quarter of fiscal 2004 we recorded $25.0 million and $5.2 million of IPR&D from our Catena and Internet Photonics acquisitions, respectively. |
21
| Long-lived assets impairment charges for the third quarter of fiscal 2004 were primarily related to the impairment of research and development equipment, which was classified as held for sale. |
| Recovery of sales, export, use tax liabilities and payments during the third quarter of fiscal 2004 was due to the resolution of a various sales, export and use tax liabilities associated with pre-acquisition ONI activities. |
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items from the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Third Quarter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income, net |
$ | 8,865 | 13.0 | $ | 4,936 | 6.5 | $ | (3,929 | ) | (44.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 8,070 | 11.8 | $ | 6,469 | 8.6 | $ | (1,601 | ) | (19.8 | ) | |||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on equity investments |
$ | | | $ | (200 | ) | 0.3 | $ | 200 | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 299 | 0.4 | $ | 205 | 0.3 | $ | (94 | ) | (31.4 | ) |
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
| Interest and other income, net decreased from the third quarter of 2003 to the third quarter of 2004 primarily because of the impact of lower average interest rates and lower cash and invested balances. |
| Interest expense decreased from the third quarter of 2003 to the third quarter of 2004 due to the decrease in our debt obligations between the two periods. |
| Provision for income taxes for the third quarter of 2003 and the third quarter of 2004 was primarily attributable to foreign tax related to CIENAs foreign operations. We did not record a tax benefit for CIENAs domestic losses during either period. CIENA will continue to maintain a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets until sufficient evidence exists to support its reversal. |
Nine months ended July 31, 2003 compared to nine months ended July 31, 2004
Revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in revenue, cost of goods sold and gross profit from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Products |
$ | 183,914 | 86.6 | $ | 181,436 | 83.7 | $ | (2,478 | ) | (1.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Services |
28,578 | 13.4 | 35,266 | 16.3 | 6,688 | 23.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Revenue: |
212,492 | 100.0 | 216,702 | 100.0 | 4,210 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||
Costs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Products |
119,177 | 56.1 | 138,918 | 64.1 | 19,741 | 16.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Services |
42,300 | 19.9 | 30,212 | 13.9 | (12,088 | ) | (28.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total cost of goods sold |
161,477 | 76.0 | 169,130 | 78.0 | 7,653 | 4.7 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gross Profit |
$ | 51,015 | 24.0 | $ | 47,572 | 22.0 | $ | (3,443 | ) | (6.7 | ) | |||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
22
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in product revenue, product cost of goods sold and product gross profit from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Product revenue |
$ | 183,914 | 100.0 | $ | 181,436 | 100.0 | $ | (2,478 | ) | (1.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Product cost of goods sold |
119,177 | 64.8 | 138,918 | 76.6 | 19,741 | 16.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Product gross profit |
$ | 64,737 | 35.2 | $ | 42,518 | 23.4 | $ | (22,219 | ) | (34.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of product revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in service revenue, service cost of goods sold and service gross profit (loss) from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Service revenue |
$ | 28,578 | 100.0 | $ | 35,266 | 100.0 | $ | 6,688 | 23.4 | |||||||||||||||
Service cost of goods sold |
42,300 | 148.0 | 30,212 | 85.7 | (12,088 | ) | (28.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Service gross profit (loss) |
$ | (13,722 | ) | (48.0 | ) | $ | 5,054 | 14.3 | $ | 18,776 | 136.8 | |||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of service revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in geographic distribution of revenues from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 136,415 | 64.2 | $ | 156,547 | 72.2 | $ | 20,132 | 14.8 | |||||||||||||||
International |
76,077 | 35.8 | 60,155 | 27.8 | (15,922 | ) | (20.9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 212,492 | 100.0 | $ | 216,702 | 100.0 | $ | 4,210 | 2.0 | |||||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
23
Historically, we have relied on a limited number of customers for a substantial portion of our revenue. During the first nine months of fiscal 2003 and first nine months of fiscal 2004, certain customers each accounted for at least 10% of our revenues during the respective periods as follows (in thousands, except percentage data):
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%** |
2004 |
%** |
|||||||||||||
Company A |
$ | 31,217 | 14.7 | $ | * | | ||||||||||
Company B |
26,250 | 12.4 | * | | ||||||||||||
Company D |
* | | 40,284 | 18.6 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 57,467 | 27.1 | $ | 40,284 | 18.6 | ||||||||||
** | Denotes % of total revenue | |
* | Denotes revenues recognized less than 10% for the period. |
Revenue
| Product revenue decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 primarily due to decreased sales of our metropolitan networking products, partially offset by sales of our newly acquired broadband access products and increased sales from our core networking products and data networking products. |
| Service revenue increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 due to increased sales of maintenance contracts. |
| Domestic revenue increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 primarily due to sales of our broadband access products, and increased sales of our data networking products, core networking products and maintenance services. This was partially offset by decreased sales from metropolitan networking products. |
| International revenue decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 primarily due to decreased sales of our metropolitan and core networking products partially offset by increased sales of maintenance contracts. |
Gross profit
Cost of goods sold consists of component costs, direct compensation costs, warranty and other contractual obligations, royalties, license fees, direct technical support costs, cost of excess and obsolete inventory and overhead related to manufacturing, technical support and engineering, furnishing and installation (EF&I) operations.
| Gross profit as a percentage of revenue decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 largely due to the sale of lower margin products and less revenue from the sale of previously reserved excess and obsolete inventory. This was partially offset by an increase in margin on our services revenue. |
| Gross profit on products as a percentage of product revenue decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 largely due to a lower margin product mix and less revenue from the sale of previously reserved excess and obsolete inventory. |
| Gross profit on services as a percentage of services revenue increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 largely due to increased sales of maintenance services and reduced service overhead costs. |
24
Operating expenses
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in operating expenses from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
$ | 153,890 | 72.4 | $ | 151,418 | 69.9 | $ | (2,472 | ) | (1.6 | ) | |||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
76,804 | 36.1 | 80,011 | 36.9 | 3,207 | 4.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
30,741 | 14.5 | 20,052 | 9.3 | (10,689 | ) | (34.8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock compensation costs: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
10,136 | 4.8 | 5,473 | 2.5 | (4,663 | ) | (46.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
2,122 | 1.0 | 2,147 | 1.0 | 25 | 1.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
General and administrative |
1,032 | 0.5 | 1,079 | 0.5 | 47 | 4.6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
11,454 | 5.4 | 19,458 | 9.0 | 8,004 | 69.9 | ||||||||||||||||||
In-process research and
development |
1,500 | 0.7 | 30,200 | 13.9 | 28,700 | 1913.3 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring
costs |
18,251 | 8.6 | 22,125 | 10.2 | 3,874 | 21.2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long-lived assets impairment |
| 7,217 | 3.3 | 7,217 | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||
Recovery of sales, export, use tax
liabilities and
payments |
| | (5,388 | ) | (2.5 | ) | (5,388 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Recovery of doubtful accounts, net |
| | (2,794 | ) | (1.3 | ) | (2,794 | ) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
$ | 305,930 | 144.0 | $ | 330,998 | 152.7 | $ | 25,068 | 8.2 | |||||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
| Research and development expense decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 due to reductions in depreciation expense, facility-related costs and employee-related costs partially offset by increases in outside services, prototype parts and the $14.2 million accelerated amortization of leasehold improvements related to the planned closing of our San Jose, California facility. |
| Selling and marketing expense increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 due to higher costs related to an increases in the number of sales and marketing employees and in tradeshow and marketing activities partially offset by reductions in depreciation expense. |
| General and administrative expense decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 primarily due to decreases in legal costs, consulting and outside service expense, and employee-related costs. |
| Stock compensation costs decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 due to the reduced level of unvested stock options and restricted stock assumed as part of our various acquisitions. As of July 31, 2004, the balance of deferred stock compensation, presented as a reduction of stockholders equity, was $17.2 million. |
| Amortization of intangible assets costs increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 due to higher amounts of purchased intangible assets, such as developed technology and customer relationships, resulting from our acquisitions of Catena and Internet Photonics. |
| In-process research and development (IPR&D) costs represents the estimated value of purchased in-process technology that had not reached technological feasibility and had no alternative future use at the time of the acquisition. In the first nine months of fiscal 2003 all of the recorded IPR&D was from our WaveSmith acquisition. In the first nine months of fiscal 2004 we recorded $25.0 million and $5.2 million of IPR&D from our Catena and Internet Photonics acquisitions, respectively. |
| Restructuring costs increased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 related to exiting a warehouse, work force reductions of approximately 442 employees and a change in estimated timing of sublease payments from our unused facilities. These actions were taken as part of our efforts to reduce our costs. We expect to incur additional restructuring costs in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. |
| Long-lived assets impairment charges for the first nine months of fiscal 2004 were primarily related to the impairment of research and development equipment, which was classified as held for sale. |
| Recovery of sales, export and use tax liabilities and payments during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 was due to the resolution of various sales, export and use tax liabilities associated with pre-acquisition ONI activities. | |||
| Recovery of doubtful accounts, net incurred during the first nine months of fiscal 2004 was related primarily to the payment of an amount due from a customer from which payment was previously deemed doubtful due to the customers financial condition. |
25
Other items
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in other items from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
Nine Months Ended July 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest and other income, net |
$ | 33,297 | 15.7 | $ | 18,228 | 8.4 | $ | (15,069 | ) | (45.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 28,334 | 13.3 | $ | 20,326 | 9.4 | $ | (8,008 | ) | (28.3 | ) | |||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on equity investments |
$ | (10 | ) | (0.0 | ) | $ | 393 | 0.2 | $ | 403 | 4,030.0 | |||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
$ | 20,606 | 9.7 | $ | 8,216 | 3.8 | $ | (12,390 | ) | (60.1 | ) | |||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
$ | 909 | 0.4 | $ | 1,044 | 0.5 | $ | 135 | 14.9 |
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
| Interest and other income, net decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 primarily because of the impact of lower average interest rates and lower cash and invested balances. |
| Interest expense decreased from the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 due to the decrease in our debt obligations between the two periods. |
| Gain on equity investments, net increased during the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 related to a cash payment of $1.6 million received for an investment in a private company that had been previously written down to a value of $1.0 million partially offset by a $0.2 million write-down of an investment. The resulting $0.4 million was recorded as a gain on equity investments. |
| Loss on extinguishment of debt during the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 is related to the repurchase of ONI 5.00% convertible subordinated notes. |
| Provision for income taxes for the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004 was primarily attributable to foreign tax related to CIENAs foreign operations. We did not record a tax benefit for CIENAs domestic losses during either period. CIENA will continue to maintain a valuation allowance against certain deferred tax assets until sufficient evidence exists to support its reversal. |
Summary of Operating Segments
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment revenues for the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Third Quarter |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
CNG |
$ | 25,737 | 37.6 | $ | 20,719 | 27.4 | $ | (5,018 | ) | (19.5 | ) | |||||||||||||
MESG |
28,351 | 41.4 | 21,521 | 28.5 | (6,830 | ) | (24.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
DNG |
5,206 | 7.6 | 7,138 | 9.4 | 1,932 | 37.1 | ||||||||||||||||||
BBG |
| | 14,962 | 19.8 | 14,962 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
Services |
9,184 | 13.4 | 11,249 | 14.9 | 2,064 | 22.5 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated revenue |
$ | 68,478 | 100.0 | $ | 75,589 | 100.0 | $ | 7,111 | 10.4 | |||||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
26
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment revenues for the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
First Nine Months Ending July 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 |
%* |
2004 |
%* |
(decrease) |
%** |
|||||||||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
CNG |
$ | 93,750 | 44.1 | $ | 95,349 | 44.0 | $ | 1,599 | 1.7 | |||||||||||||||
MESG |
84,958 | 40.0 | 57,286 | 26.4 | (27,672 | ) | (32.6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
DNG |
5,206 | 2.5 | 13,839 | 6.4 | 8,633 | 165.8 | ||||||||||||||||||
BBG |
| | 14,962 | 6.9 | 14,962 | N/A | ||||||||||||||||||
Services |
28,578 | 13.4 | 35,266 | 16.3 | 6,688 | 23.4 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated revenue |
$ | 212,492 | 100.0 | $ | 216,702 | 100.0 | $ | 4,210 | 2.0 | |||||||||||||||
* | Denotes % of total revenue | |
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment profit (loss) and the reconciliation to consolidated net loss for the third quarter of fiscal 2003 to the third quarter of fiscal 2004.
Third
Quarter |
||||||||||||||||
(Increase) | ||||||||||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
decrease |
%** |
|||||||||||||
Segment profit (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
CNG |
$ | (17,462 | ) | $ | (17,795 | ) | $ | (333 | ) | (1.9 | ) | |||||
MESG |
(13,377 | ) | (12,128 | ) | 1,249 | 9.3 | ||||||||||
DNG |
1,519 | (2,197 | ) | (3,716 | ) | (244.6 | ) | |||||||||
BBG |
| (141 | ) | (141 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Services |
(5,221 | ) | 1,709 | 6,930 | 132.7 | |||||||||||
Total segment profit (loss) |
$ | (34,541 | ) | $ | (30,552 | ) | $ | 3,989 | 11.5 | |||||||
Other non performance items: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate selling and marketing |
(21,423 | ) | (25,377 | ) | (3,954 | ) | (18.5 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate general and administrative |
(7,969 | ) | (6,969 | ) | 1,000 | 12.5 | ||||||||||
Stock compensation costs: |
||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
(2,932 | ) | (1,860 | ) | 1,072 | 36.6 | ||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
(687 | ) | (1,214 | ) | (527 | ) | (76.7 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative |
(312 | ) | (879 | ) | (567 | ) | (181.7 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
(4,479 | ) | (12,667 | ) | (8,188 | ) | (182.8 | ) | ||||||||
In-process research and development |
(1,500 | ) | (30,200 | ) | (28,700 | ) | (1,913.3 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring costs |
(15,527 | ) | (13,547 | ) | 1,980 | 12.8 | ||||||||||
Long-lived asset impairments |
| (7,217 | ) | (7,217 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Recovery of sale, export, use tax
liabilities and payments |
| 3,457 | 3,457 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Recovery of doubtful accounts, net |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Accelerated amortization of leasehold |
| (12,504 | ) | (12,504 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Interest and other financial charges, net |
795 | (1,733 | ) | (2,528 | ) | (318.0 | ) | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
(299 | ) | (205 | ) | 94 | 31.4 | ||||||||||
Consolidated net loss |
$ | (88,874 | ) | $ | (141,467 | ) | $ | (52,593 | ) | (59.2 | ) | |||||
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
27
The table below (in thousands, except percentage data) sets forth the changes in our operating segment profit (loss) and the reconciliation to consolidated net loss for the first nine months of fiscal 2003 to the first nine months of fiscal 2004.
First Nine Months Ending July 31, |
||||||||||||||||
(Increase) | ||||||||||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
decrease |
%** |
|||||||||||||
Segment profit (loss): |
||||||||||||||||
CNG |
$ | (57,982 | ) | $ | (54,211 | ) | $ | 3,771 | 6.5 | |||||||
MESG |
(37,210 | ) | (39,816 | ) | (2,606 | ) | (7.0 | ) | ||||||||
DNG |
1,281 | (9,490 | ) | (10,771 | ) | (840.8 | ) | |||||||||
BBG |
| (374 | ) | (374 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Services |
(17,288 | ) | 3,589 | 20,877 | 120.8 | |||||||||||
Total segment profit (loss) |
$ | (111,199 | ) | $ | (100,302 | ) | $ | 10,897 | 9.8 | |||||||
Other non performance items: |
||||||||||||||||
Corporate selling and marketing |
(68,480 | ) | (69,402 | ) | (922 | ) | (1.3 | ) | ||||||||
Corporate general and administrative |
(30,741 | ) | (20,052 | ) | 10,689 | 34.8 | ||||||||||
Stock compensation costs: |
||||||||||||||||
Research and development |
(10,136 | ) | (5,473 | ) | 4,663 | 46.0 | ||||||||||
Selling and marketing |
(2,122 | ) | (2,147 | ) | (25 | ) | (1.2 | ) | ||||||||
General and administrative |
(1,032 | ) | (1,079 | ) | (47 | ) | (4.6 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of intangible assets |
(11,454 | ) | (19,458 | ) | (8,004 | ) | (69.9 | ) | ||||||||
In-process research and development |
(1,500 | ) | (30,200 | ) | (28,700 | ) | (1,913.3 | ) | ||||||||
Restructuring costs |
(18,251 | ) | (22,125 | ) | (3,874 | ) | (21.2 | ) | ||||||||
Long-lived asset impairments |
| (7,217 | ) | (7,217 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Recovery of sale, export, use tax
liabilities and payments |
| 5,388 | 5,388 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Recovery of doubtful accounts, net |
| 2,794 | 2,794 | N/A | ||||||||||||
Accelerated amortization of leasehold |
| (14,153 | ) | (14,153 | ) | N/A | ||||||||||
Interest and other financial charges, net |
(15,653 | ) | (9,921 | ) | 5,732 | 36.6 | ||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
(909 | ) | (1,044 | ) | (135 | ) | (14.9 | ) | ||||||||
Consolidated net loss |
$ | (271,477 | ) | $ | (294,391 | ) | $ | (22,914 | ) | (8.4 | ) | |||||
** | Denotes % change from 2003 to 2004 |
Segment profit (loss) is determined based on internal performance measures used by the Chief Executive Officer to assess the performance of each operating segment in a given period. In connection with that assessment, the Chief Executive Officer excludes the following other non-performance items: corporate selling and marketing; corporate general and administrative costs; stock compensation; amortization of intangibles; in-process research and development; restructuring costs; long-lived asset impairment; recovery of sale, export and use taxes; provisions or recovery of doubtful accounts; accelerated amortization of leaseholds; interest income, interest expense, equity investment gains or losses, gains or losses on extinguishment of debt, and provisions for income taxes.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At July 31, 2004, CIENAs principal source of liquidity was its cash and cash equivalents, and short-term and long-term investments. We had $255.7 million in cash and cash equivalents, and $1.1 billion in short-term and long-term investments. Our investment portfolio consists primarily of fixed-income securities, with maturities of two years or less, diversified among industries and individual issuers. Our investments are generally liquid, investment grade securities.
CIENAs operating activities consumed $174.7 million and $196.8 million net cash during the first nine months of fiscal 2003 and 2004, respectively. The primary reason for operating cash consumption was the net losses incurred during the periods.
Our investing activities provided net cash of $516.4 million and $178.0 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2003 and 2004, respectively. Investment activities included the net redemption of $537.1 million and $197.4 million of short and long-term investments during the first nine months of fiscal 2003 and fiscal 2004, respectively.
28
We expect to make additional combined capital equipment, leasehold improvements and intellectual property expenditures of approximately $13.0 million during the remainder of fiscal 2004. These capital expenditures will be used to support selling and marketing, manufacturing and product development activities. We will use our cash and cash equivalents and investments to fund these purchases.
Cash used in financing activities was $133.6 and $35.1 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2003 and 2004, respectively. The primary use of cash in financing activities during the first nine months of fiscal 2003 was related to the purchase of $154.7 million of the remaining $202.9 million in outstanding ONI convertible subordinated notes. We paid $140.3 million for the notes and fees related to the purchase. Also during the first nine months of fiscal 2003, we received $5.9 million from the exercise of stock options and $1.6 million from the repayment of notes receivable from stockholders. During the first nine months of fiscal 2004, CIENA purchased the remaining $48.2 million of the outstanding ONI convertible subordinated notes. CIENA paid $49.2 million for notes with a cumulative accreted book value of $41.0 million, which resulted in a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $8.2 million. Also during the first nine months of fiscal 2004, we received $14.0 million related to the exercise of employee options.
The following is a summary of our future minimum payments under contractual obligations as of July 31, 2004 (in thousands):
Less than | One to | Four to five | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
one year |
three years |
years |
Thereafter |
||||||||||||||||
Convertible notes (1) |
$ | 780,563 | $ | 25,875 | $ | 51,750 | $ | 702,938 | $ | | ||||||||||
Operating leases |
228,866 | 38,189 | 68,065 | 55,737 | 66,875 | |||||||||||||||
Purchase obligations (2) |
44,866 | 44,866 | | | | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,054,295 | $ | 108,930 | $ | 119,815 | $ | 758,675 | $ | 66,875 | ||||||||||
(1) | The terms of our convertible notes with a principal value of $690.0 million include interest at 3.75% payable on a semi-annual basis on February 1 and August 1 of each year; the notes are due February 1, 2008. | |
(2) | Purchase commitments related to amounts we are obligated to pay to our contract manufacturers and component suppliers for inventory. |
Some of our commercial commitments, including some of the future minimum payments set forth above, are secured by standby letters of credit. The following is a summary of our commercial commitments secured by standby letters of credit by commitment expiration date as of July 31, 2004 (in thousands):
One to | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | three | Four to | ||||||||||||||||||
Total |
one year |
years |
five years |
Thereafter |
||||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit |
$ | 15,210 | $ | 14,185 | $ | 925 | $ | 100 | $ | | ||||||||||
CIENA does not engage in any off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In particular, we do not have any interest in so-called limited purpose entities, which include special purpose entities (SPEs) and structured finance entities.
Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and cash generated from operations will satisfy our working capital needs, capital expenditures, investment requirements, commitments, and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operations through at least the next 12 months.
29
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires CIENA to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Those policies are described in our annual report on Form 10-K. On an on-going basis, we re-evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, investments, intangible assets, goodwill, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring, and contingencies and litigation. CIENA bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Among other things, these estimates form the basis for judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. During the first nine months of fiscal 2004, re-evaluation of certain estimates led to the effects described below.
Reserve for Inventory Obsolescence
CIENA writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketable inventory equal to the difference between the cost of inventory and the estimated market value based on assumptions about future demand and market conditions. During the first nine months of fiscal 2003, we recorded a benefit for inventory reserves of $4.2 million primarily related to the realization of sales from previously reserved excess inventory. During the first nine months of fiscal 2004, we recorded a charge of $3.0 million primarily related to excess inventory due to a change in forecasted sales for certain products. If actual market conditions differ from those we have projected, we may be required to take additional inventory write-downs or benefits.
Restructuring
As part of its restructuring costs, CIENA provides for the estimated cost of the net lease expense for facilities that are no longer being used. The provision is equal to the minimum future lease payments offset by estimated sublease payments. Due to the continued excess supply of commercial properties in certain markets where our unused facilities are located, we have reduced our estimate of the total future sublease payments we will receive. As a result, we recorded an additional restructuring cost of $3.5 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2004. As of the end of the third quarter of fiscal 2004, CIENAs accrued restructuring liability related to net lease expense and other related charges was $54.6 million. The total minimum lease payments for these restructured facilities are $89.5 million. These lease payments will be made over the lives of our leases, which range from seven months to fifteen years. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those we have projected, we may be required to recognize additional restructuring costs associated with these facilities.
Goodwill
Due to the Companys reorganization into operating segments, SFAS 142 requires that we assign goodwill to the Companys reporting units. CIENA has determined its operating segments and reporting units are the same. In accordance with SFAS 142 CIENA will test each reporting units goodwill for impairment on an annual basis, and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would, more likely than not, reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying value. As of July 31, 2004 CIENA has $780.9 million of goodwill. Based on the operating results, forecasts, and business factors with the segments, CIENA does not believe there have been any triggering events which would require an interim impairment assessment, despite the decline in CIENAs stock price during the third quarter of fiscal 2004. CIENAs annual test for impairment will take place in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. If actual market conditions differ or projected forecasts change at the time of our annual assessment or in subsequent periods after our annul assessment, we may be required to record goodwill impairment charges.
30
Risk Factors
Investing in our securities involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the other information contained in this quarterly report, including the reports we incorporate by reference, you should consider the following factors before investing in our securities.
Our business could continue to be adversely affected by unfavorable and uncertain conditions in the communications industry
The last three years have seen substantial changes in the communications industry. Most of our customers and potential customers have confronted static or declining revenue. Many have experienced significant financial distress, and some have gone out of business. Others have announced their withdrawal from segments of the business. This has resulted in a significant change in the structure of the equipment industry, with greater concentration of purchasing power in a small number of large services providers, combined with a substantial reduction in overall demand. Together these factors have adversely affected our revenue and operating results. In addition, most of our customers have become more conservative and uncertain about their future purchases, which has made managing our business difficult.
We expect the factors described above to continue to affect our business for an indeterminate period, in several significant ways:
| capital expenditures by many of our customers may be flat or reduced; |
| we will continue to have only limited ability to forecast the volume and product mix of our sales; |
| managing our expenditures will be difficult in light of the uncertainties surrounding our business; |
| increased competition resulting from reduced demand will put substantial downward pressures on the pricing of our products, tending to reduce our profit margins; |
| increased competition will enable customers to insist on more favorable terms and conditions for sales, including extended payment terms or other financing assistance, as a condition of procuring their business; and |
| the bankruptcies or weakened financial condition of some of our customers may require us to write off amounts due to us from prior sales. |
The result of any one or a combination of these factors could lead to further reduced revenue and increased operating losses.
We face intense competition that could hurt our sales and profitability
The market for networking solutions is extremely competitive. Competition in this market is based on varying combinations of price, functionality, manufacturing capability, installation, services, scalability and the ability of the system solutions to meet customers immediate and future network requirements. A small number of very large companies, including Alcatel, Cisco, Fujitsu, Hitachi, Huawei, Lucent, Marconi, NEC, Nortel, and Siemens have historically dominated the telecommunications equipment industry. They all have greater financial, marketing, manufacturing and intellectual property resources than CIENA. They also often have existing relationships with our customers and potential customers. We also compete with a number of smaller companies that provide significant competition.
Because we sell systems that compete directly with product offerings of these companies, and in some cases displace or replace their equipment, we represent a competitive threat. The decline in the market for communications networking products has resulted in even greater competitive pressures. We expect that the aggressive tactics we have confronted on the part of many of these competitors will continue, and perhaps become more severe. These tactics include:
| intense price competition in sales of new equipment, resulting in lower profit margins; |
| discounting resulting from sales of used equipment or inventory that a competitor has written down or written off; |
31
| early announcements of competing products and other marketing efforts; |
| one-stop shopping options; |
| customer financing assistance; |
| marketing and advertising assistance; and |
| intellectual property disputes. |
Tactics such as those described above can be particularly effective in a concentrated customer base like ours. Our customers are under increasing competitive pressure to deliver their services at the lowest possible cost. This pressure may result in the pricing of communications networking systems becoming a more important factor in customer decisions. This may favor larger competitors that can spread the effect of price discounts across a larger array of products and services and across a larger customer base than ours. If we are unable to offset any reductions in the average sales price for our products by a reduction in the cost of our products, our gross profit margins will be adversely affected. Our inability to compete successfully against our competitors and maintain our gross profit margins would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
New competitors continue to emerge to compete with our products. They often base their products on the latest available technology. They may achieve commercial availability of their products more quickly due to the narrower focus of their efforts. Our inability to compete successfully against these companies would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our future success will depend on our ability to sell our products to our existing incumbent carrier customers and add additional incumbent carriers as new customers
Historically, a large percentage of our sales were made to emerging carriers, many of which no longer exist or have experienced severe financial difficulties and have reduced their equipment purchases. We expect that our sales to emerging carriers will continue to be at a lower level than they were at one time. Consequently, our future success will depend, to a large extent, on our ability to increase our sales to large domestic and international incumbent carriers.
We have limited experience in selling to incumbent carriers relative to many of our larger competitors. Many of them have long-standing relationships with incumbent carriers, which present additional challenges to the sales process. The sales cycle for these larger customers is often substantially longer than for sales to smaller customers; and they often require extensive testing of products before deciding to purchase them. In addition, even after a product has been selected for an incumbent carriers network and a contract has been signed, we are typically unable to recognize revenue until final network certification tests are completed satisfactorily, a process that is often lengthy and difficult. Complying with these certification requirements may involve unanticipated delays that could adversely affect our ability to sell to larger carriers or the timing of recognition of revenue. If we do not succeed in increasing our sales to our existing incumbent carrier customers and adding additional incumbent carriers as customers, our business will suffer.
We may not be successful in selling our products into new markets and developing and managing new sales channels
We believe that, in order to succeed, we must enter new markets and build a larger and more diverse customer base. Therefore, we are beginning to sell some of our products to enterprises, cable operators, independent operating companies and federal, state and local governments. To succeed in these markets, we believe we must develop and manage new sales channels through resellers, distributors and systems integrators. Since we have only limited experience in developing and managing such channels, it is uncertain to what extent we will be successful.
Sales to federal, state and local governments often require compliance with complex procurement rules and regulations with which we have little experience. We may be unable to increase our sales to government contractors if we determine that we cannot comply with applicable rules and regulations. In addition, failure to comply with rules and regulations for existing contracts could result in civil, criminal or administrative proceedings involving fines and suspension or debarment from federal government contracts.
32
Failure to succeed in these new markets will adversely affect our ability to achieve our planned levels of revenue, which would adversely affect our profitability.
Our strategy involves pursuing strategic acquisitions and investments that may not be successful
Our business strategy includes acquiring or making strategic investments in other companies to expand our portfolio of products and services and to acquire or accelerate the development of new or improved products. To do so, we may use cash, issue equity that would dilute our current stockholders ownership, incur debt or assume indebtedness. In addition, we may incur significant amortization expenses related to intangible assets. Strategic investments and acquisitions involve numerous risks, including:
| potential large cash expenditures; |
| difficulties in integrating the operations, technologies and products of the acquired companies; |
| diversion of managements attention; |
| potential difficulties in completing projects of the acquired company; |
| the potential loss of key employees of the acquired company; |
| dependence on unfamiliar or relatively small supply partners; and |
| exposure to unanticipated liabilities. |
In addition, acquisitions and strategic investments may involve risks of entering markets in which we have little or no prior experience and competitors have stronger market positions.
We may not be able to achieve the benefits we anticipate from our acquisitions of Catena and Internet Photonics
On May 3, 2004, we completed the acquisitions of Catena and Internet Photonics. It is possible we will not achieve all of the benefits we anticipate from these acquisitions. The markets for their products may not be as strong as we believed when we determined to make the acquisitions. Moreover, we have limited experience in these markets, and there is a risk that we will not be successful in selling into them. The process of integrating the Catena and Internet Photonics platforms into CIENAs portfolio is complex and exposes us to a variety of risks.
Acquisitions also create additional risks. For example, the acquisitions resulted in CIENA assuming the liabilities of Catena and Internet Photonics. These liabilities may include liabilities to stockholders, customers, suppliers or employees, as well as liabilities related to intellectual property disputes.
Product performance problems could limit our sales prospects
The development and production of new products with high technology content often involves problems with software, components and manufacturing methods. If significant reliability, quality or network monitoring problems develop, including those due to defects in software or faulty components, a number of negative effects on our business could result, including:
| costs associated with fixing software or hardware defects; | |||
| high service and warranty expenses; |
| payment of liquidated damages for performance failures; |
33
| high inventory obsolescence expense; |
| high levels of product returns; |
| delays in collecting accounts receivable; |
| reduced orders from existing customers; and |
| declining interest from potential customers. |
Although we maintain accruals for product warranties, actual costs could exceed these amounts. From time to time, there will be interruptions or delays in the activation of our products at a customers site. These interruptions or delays may result from product performance problems or from issues with installation and activation, some of which are outside our control. If we experience significant interruptions or delays that we cannot promptly resolve, confidence in our products could be undermined, which could cause us to lose customers or otherwise harm our business.
The steps that we are taking to restructure and reduce the size of our operations could disrupt our business
Since November 2001, we have taken several steps, including reductions in force and dispositions of assets, to reduce the size of our operations to better match the reduced sales of our products and services. During the next six to twelve months we expect to take steps to reduce our operating expenses even further.
This could cause additional disruption in our business, could result in lost revenue and will require us to incur expenses. For example, we have restructured our sales force and other customer-facing operations. If we do not manage this program effectively, our relationships with our customers could be disturbed. In addition, on April 20, 2004, we announced our intention to close our San Jose, California facility on September 30, 2004. As a result, we will be required to transfer ongoing development work on certain CIENA product lines to other CIENA facilities. If we cannot manage this transition effectively, our development efforts could be disrupted, which could harm our business.
We must continue to make substantial investments in new technology that may not produce anticipated results
In order to be successful, we must balance our initiatives to reduce our operating costs against the need to keep pace with technological advances. The market for communications networking solutions is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent introductions of new products, and recurring changes in customer requirements. To succeed in this market, we must continue to develop new products and new features for existing products. Doing so is difficult and costly, and there is no assurance that we will be successful. In addition, we must be able to identify and gain access to promising new technologies.
We are investing substantial resources in developing and delivering products that reside toward the edge of large communications networks. As a result, we have undertaken a number of efforts to expand our addressable market and the range of solutions we are able to offer both current and potential customers. We are implementing this strategy through a combination of internal development, acquisitions of smaller companies, and strategic alliances with other vendors. We are continuing to make the necessary investments to maintain our technology leadership in our core networking products. If we do not execute this strategy effectively, we could lose our existing market share for core networking products to our competitors, and fail to succeed in the new markets that we are entering, which would likely have an adverse effect on our financial condition.
Selling our products requires substantial investments of our resources that may not produce anticipated benefits
In order to sell our products to both potential and existing customers, we must invest in financial, engineering, manufacturing and logistics support resources, even though we are unsure of the volume, duration or timing of customer purchases. Our customers are generally technically sophisticated and demanding. Consequently, we may incur substantial expenses and devote resources to potential relationships that never materialize or fulfill our expectations, in which event our investment may largely be lost.
34
Our results can fluctuate unpredictably
Purchases by many of our potential and existing customers can be unpredictable, sporadic and subject to unanticipated changes. Our results, in turn, can fluctuate unpredictably. A decision to purchase our products may require a significant investment and commitment of resources by our customers. As a result, the sales cycles for many of our products are long, often as much as a year or two between initial contact with a potential customer and the recognition of revenue from sales to the customer. Further, purchases by our existing customers tend to be large and sporadic, depending upon their need to build a customer base, their plans for expanding their networks, the availability of financing, and the effects of regulatory and business conditions in the countries in which they operate. Current economic and market conditions have made it even more difficult to make reliable estimates of future revenue.
Fluctuations in our revenue can lead to even greater fluctuations in our operating results. Our budgeted expense levels depend in part on our expectations of long-term future revenue. Any substantial adjustment to expenses to account for lower levels of revenue is difficult and takes time. Consequently, if our revenue does decline, our levels of inventory, operating expenses and general overhead would be high relative to our revenue, resulting in additional operating losses.
Other factors can also contribute to fluctuations in our revenue and operating results, including:
| variations and the mix between higher and lower margin products and services; |
| fluctuations in demand for our products; |
| changes in our pricing policies or the pricing policies of our competitors; |
| the timing and size of orders from customers; |
| changes in customers requirements, including changes or cancellations to orders from customers; |
| the introduction of new products by us or our competitors; |
| changes in the price or availability of components for our products; |
| readiness of customer sites for installation; |
| satisfaction of contractual customer acceptance criteria and related revenue recognition issues; |
| manufacturing and shipment delays and deferrals; |
| increased service, installation, warranty or repair costs; |
| the timing and amount of employer payroll tax to be paid on employee gains on stock options exercised; and |
| changes in general economic conditions as well as those specific to the telecommunications industry. |
We may not be successful in enhancing and upgrading our products
Since our products are based on complex technology, we can experience unanticipated delays in developing, improving, manufacturing or deploying them. Modifying our products to enable customers to integrate them into a new type of network architecture entails similar development risks.
Certain enhancements to our products are in the development phase and are not yet ready for commercial manufacturing or deployment. The maturing process from laboratory prototype to customer trials, and subsequently to general availability, involves a number of steps, including:
35
| completion of product development; |
| the qualification and multiple sourcing of critical components; |
| validation of manufacturing methods and processes; |
| extensive quality assurance and reliability testing, and staffing of testing infrastructure; |
| validation of software; and |
| establishment of systems integration and systems test validation requirements. |
Each of these steps, in turn, presents serious risks of failure, rework or delay, any one of which could decrease the speed and scope of product introduction and marketplace acceptance of the product. Specialized application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) and intensive software testing and validation are key to the timely introduction of enhancements to several of our products, and schedule delays are common in the final validation phase, as well as in the manufacture of specialized ASICs. In addition, unexpected intellectual property disputes, failure of critical design elements, and a host of other execution risks may delay or even prevent the introduction of these products. If we do not develop and successfully introduce products in a timely manner, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be harmed.
If we are unable to retain and attract qualified personnel, we may be unable to effectively manage our business
If we are unable to retain and motivate our existing employees and attract qualified personnel to fill key positions, we may be unable to effectively develop our existing products, make timely product introductions and increase sales. Since we generally do not have employment contracts with our employees, we must rely upon providing competitive compensation packages and a dynamic work environment to retain and motivate employees. In response to the decline in our revenue and weakness in the telecommunications equipment market, we have not increased salaries for most of our employees since the end of fiscal 2001. In addition, we have paid our employees significantly reduced or no bonuses under our bonus program since the end of fiscal 2001. Since our compensation packages include equity-based incentives, pressure on our stock price could affect our ability to continue to offer competitive compensation packages to our employees. In addition to these compensation issues, we must continue to motivate employees to execute our strategies and achieve our goals, which may be difficult due to morale challenges posed by the workforce reductions and uncertainty in our industry.
If we lose members of our management team or other key personnel, it may be difficult to replace them. Competition for highly skilled technical and other personnel can be intense. As a result, we may not be successful in identifying, recruiting and hiring qualified engineers and other key personnel.
We rely on contract manufacturers for our products
We rely on contract manufacturers to perform the majority of the manufacturing operations for our products. The qualification of these manufacturers is an expensive and time-consuming process, and these contract manufacturers build product for other companies, including our competitors. In addition, we do not have contracts in place with some of these manufacturers. We may not be able to effectively manage our relationships with our manufacturers and we cannot be certain that they will be able to fill our orders in a timely manner. If we underestimate our future product requirements, the contract manufacturers may not have enough product to meet our customer requirements, and this could result in delays in the shipment of our products which could harm our business. If we overestimate product requirements, we may have to write off excess inventory.
We are constantly reviewing our contract manufacturing capability to ensure that our production requirements are met in terms of cost, capacity and quality. Periodically, we may decide to transfer the manufacturing of a product from one contract manufacturer to another, to better meet our production needs. It is possible that we may not effectively manage this transition or the new contract manufacturer may not perform as well as expected and, as a result, we may not be able to fill orders in a timely manner which could harm our business.
36
We rely on service delivery partners
We rely on a number of service delivery partners, both domestic and international, to complement CIENAs global service and support resources. The certification of these partners incurs costs and is time-consuming, and these partners service products for other companies, including our competitors. We may not be able to effectively manage our relationships with our partners and we cannot be certain that they will be able to deliver our services in the manner or time required. If our service partners are unsuccessful in delivering services:
| our services revenue may be adversely affected; and |
| we may suffer delays in recognizing product revenues in cases were revenue recognition is dependent upon product installation, testing and acceptance. |
We depend on a limited number of suppliers, and for some items we do not have a substitute supplier
We depend on a limited number of suppliers for components of our products, as well as for equipment used to manufacture and test our products. Our products include several high-performance components for which reliable, high-volume suppliers are particularly limited. Furthermore, some key optical and electronic components we use in our products are currently available only from sole or limited sources, and in some cases, that source also is a competitor. Any delay in component availability for any of our products could result in delays in deployment of these products and in our ability to recognize revenue. These delays could also harm our customer relationships and our results of operations.
Furthermore, the market for optical components has recently been consolidated resulting in reduced competition, which could lead to higher prices. In addition, the loss of a source of supply of key components could require us to re-engineer products that use those components, which would increase our costs.
On occasion, we have experienced delays in receipt of components and have received components that do not perform according to their specifications. Any future difficulty in obtaining sufficient and timely delivery of components could result in delays or reductions in product shipments, which, in turn, could harm our business.
Any delays in component availability for any of our products or test equipment could result in delays in deployment of these products and in our ability to recognize revenue from them. These delays could also harm our customer relationships and our results of operations.
Our ability to compete could be harmed if we are unable to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights or if we infringe on intellectual property rights of others
We share our proprietary information and intellectual property, including our source code, with other parties as necessary to meet the needs of our business. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws and restrictions on disclosure to protect our intellectual property rights. We enter into non-disclosure and proprietary rights agreements with our employees and consultants, license agreements with our corporate partners, and we control access to and distribution of our products, documentation and other proprietary information. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy or otherwise obtain and use our products or technology. This is likely to become an increasing issue as we expand our operations and sales into countries that provide a lower level of protection for intellectual property.
Monitoring unauthorized use of our products is difficult, and we cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use of our technology. If competitors are able to use our technology, our ability to compete effectively could be harmed. We have filed a patent infringement lawsuit to enforce our intellectual property rights, and may become involved with additional disputes in the future. Such lawsuits can be costly and may significantly divert the time and attention of our personnel.
We have been subject to several claims of patent infringement, which in some cases have required us to pay the patent holders substantial sums or enter into license agreements requiring ongoing royalty payments. The frequency of assertions of patent infringement in the field of telecommunications networking solutions is increasing as patent holders seek alternative sources of revenue. There is a possibility that we may again find ourselves required to take patent licenses or to redesign or stop selling products that allegedly infringe patents belonging to others. If we are sued for infringement and are unsuccessful in defending the suit, we could be subject to significant damages, and our business and customer relationships could be adversely affected.
37
We face risks associated with our international operations
We market, sell and service our products globally. We have established offices around the world, including in North America, Europe, Latin America and the Asia Pacific region. We expect that our international activities will be fluid over the foreseeable future as we enter some new markets and withdraw from or reduce operations in others. This fluctuation will require significant management attention and financial resources. In some countries, our success will depend in part on our ability to form relationships with local partners. We cannot be sure that we will be able to identify appropriate partners or reach mutually satisfactory arrangements with them for sales of our products. There is a risk that we may sometimes choose the wrong partner. For these reasons, we may not be able to maintain or increase international market demand for our products.
International operations are subject to inherent risks, and our future results could be adversely affected by a variety of uncontrollable and changing factors. These include:
| greater difficulty in collecting accounts receivable and longer collection periods; |
| difficulties and costs of staffing and managing foreign operations; |
| the impact of recessions in economies outside the United States; |
| unexpected changes in regulatory requirements; |
| certification requirements; |
| reduced protection for intellectual property rights in some countries; |
| potentially adverse tax consequences; |
| political and economic instability; |
| trade protection measures and other regulatory requirements; |
| effects of changes in currency exchange rates; |
| service provider and government spending patterns; and |
| natural disasters and epidemics. |
Such factors could have a material adverse impact on our operating results and financial condition.
We face risks in reselling the products of other companies
We have recently entered into agreements that permit us to distribute the products of other companies and may enter into other agreements in the future. To the extent we succeed in reselling the products of these companies, we may be required by customers to assume warranty and service obligations. While these suppliers have agreed to support us with respect to those obligations, they are relatively small companies with limited financial resources. If they should be unable, for any reason, to provide the required support, we may have to expend our own resources on doing so. This risk is amplified by the fact that the equipment has been designed and manufactured by others, and is thus subject to warranty claims whose magnitude we are currently unable to evaluate fully.
We are exposed to the credit risk of our customers
Industry and economic conditions have weakened the financial position of some of our customers. To sell to some of these customers, we may be required to take risks of uncollectible accounts. While we monitor these situations carefully and attempt to take appropriate measures to protect ourselves, it is possible that we may have to write down or write off doubtful accounts. Such write-downs or write-offs, if large, could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
38
Our stock price is volatile
Our common stock price has experienced substantial volatility in the past, and is likely to remain volatile in the future. Volatility can arise as a result of divergence between our actual or anticipated financial results and published expectations of analysts, and announcements that we, our competitors, or our customers may make.
Divergence between our actual results and our anticipated results, analyst estimates and public announcements by us, our competitors, or by customers will occur from time to time in the future, with resulting stock price volatility, irrespective of our overall year-to-year performance or long-term prospects. As long as we continue to depend on a limited customer base, and particularly when a substantial majority of their purchases consist of newly introduced products, there is substantial chance that our quarterly results will vary widely.
Forward-looking statements
Some of the statements contained, or incorporated by reference, in this quarterly report discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of operations or financial condition or state other forward-looking information. Those statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by the statements. The forward-looking information is based on various factors and was derived using numerous assumptions. In some cases, you can identify these so-called forward-looking statements by words like may, will, should, expects, plans, anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential or continue or the negative of those words and other comparable words. You should be aware that those statements only reflect our predictions. Actual events or results may differ substantially. Important factors that could cause our actual results to be materially different from the forward-looking statements are disclosed throughout this report, particularly under the heading Risk Factors above. We do not undertake a duty to update any of our forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The following discussion about the Companys market risk disclosures involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. CIENA maintains a short-term and long-term investment portfolio. These available-for-sale securities are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by 10% from levels at July 31, 2004, the fair value of the portfolio would decline by approximately $68.2 million.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk. As a global concern, CIENA faces exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and if our exposure increases, adverse movement in foreign currency exchange rates could have a material adverse impact on CIENAs financial results. Historically CIENAs primary exposures have been related to non-dollar denominated operating expenses in Europe and Asia where CIENA sells primarily in U.S. dollars. CIENA is prepared to hedge against fluctuations in foreign currency if this exposure becomes material. As of July 31, 2004, the assets and liabilities of CIENA related to non-dollar denominated currencies were not material. Therefore, we do not expect an increase or decrease of 10% in the foreign exchange rate would have a material impact on CIENAs financial position.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of CIENA have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, they were effective.
There was no change in CIENAs internal control over financial reporting during CIENAs last fiscal quarter that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, CIENAs internal control over financial reporting.
39
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On October 3, 2000, Stanford University and Litton Systems filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Central District of California alleging that optical fiber amplifiers incorporated into CIENAs products infringe U.S. Patent No. 4,859,016 (the `016 Patent). The complaint seeks injunctive relief, royalties and damages. We believe that we have valid defenses to the lawsuit and intend to defend it vigorously. On October 10, 2003, the court stayed the case pending final resolution of matters before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the PTO), including a request for and disposition of a reexamination of the 016 Patent. On October 16, 2003, the PTO granted reexamination of the 016 Patent, thus resulting in a continuation of the stay of the case.
On July 19, 2000, CIENA and CIENA Properties, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of CIENA, filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware requesting damages and injunctive relief against Corvis Corporation (Corvis). The suit charged Corvis with infringing four patents relating to CIENAs optical networking communication systems and technology. A jury trial to determine whether Corvis is infringing these patents commenced on February 10, 2003. On February 24, 2003, the jury decided that Corvis was infringing one of the patents and not infringing two others. The jury was deadlocked with respect to infringement on the fourth patent. This trial was immediately followed by a trial on Corvis affirmative defenses based on the validity of two of the patents. On February 28, 2003, the jury in this trial determined that the patents were valid. In April 2003, following a third trial, another jury decided that Corvis had infringed the fourth patent on which the previous jury had deadlocked. Based on these favorable verdicts collectively holding that Corvis is infringing two valid CIENA patents, CIENA has moved for an injunction to prohibit the manufacture, sale or use by Corvis of the infringing products. The court has not yet ruled on this motion.
As a result of the merger with ONI, we became a defendant in a securities class action lawsuit. Beginning in August 2001, a number of substantially identical class action complaints alleging violations of the federal securities laws were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. These complaints name ONI, Hugh C. Martin, ONIs former chairman, president and chief executive officer; Chris A. Davis, ONIs former executive vice president, chief financial officer and administrative officer; and certain underwriters of ONIs initial public offering as defendants. The complaints were consolidated into a single action, and a consolidated amended complaint was filed on April 24, 2002. The amended complaint alleges, among other things, that the underwriter defendants violated the securities laws by failing to disclose alleged compensation arrangements (such as undisclosed commissions or stock stabilization practices) in the initial public offerings registration statement and by engaging in manipulative practices to artificially inflate the price of ONIs common stock after the initial public offering. The amended complaint also alleges that ONI and the named former officers violated the securities laws on the basis of an alleged failure to disclose the underwriters alleged compensation arrangements and manipulative practices. No specific amount of damages has been claimed. Similar complaints have been filed against more than 300 other issuers that have had initial public offerings since 1998, and all of these actions have been included in a single coordinated proceeding. Mr. Martin and Ms. Davis have been dismissed from the action without prejudice pursuant to a tolling agreement. In July 2004, following mediated settlement negotiations, the plaintiffs, the issuer defendants (including CIENA), and their insurers entered into a settlement agreement, whereby the plaintiffs cases against the issuers are to be dismissed. This settlement is subject to court approval. The settling parties have moved the court for approval of the settlement, which motion has been opposed by the underwriter defendants.
As a result of the merger with ONI, we also became a defendant in two substantially identical purported class actions on behalf of ONI security holders originally brought against ONI and members of its board of directors. The complaints allege that the director defendants breached their fiduciary duties to ONI in approving the merger with CIENA and seek declaratory, injunctive and other relief permitted by equity. The plaintiffs failed to obtain an injunction against completion of the merger. The first of these cases was filed on February 20, 2002, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Mateo, and is encaptioned K.W. Sams, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. ONI Systems Corporation, et al. The second case was brought on March 19, 2002, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, and is encaptioned Steven Myeary, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. ONI Systems Corporation. On April 14, 2003, the plaintiffs in these cases filed a consolidated amended complaint and named four additional defendants: CIENA Corporation, James F. Jordan, Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and Mohr Davidow Ventures. CIENA and the other defendants subsequently filed a demurrer and served a motion for sanctions on plaintiffs based on factual inaccuracies in the consolidated amended complaint. In response, the plaintiffs filed a corrected consolidated amended complaint, the demurrer to which was sustained by the court in April 2004 with leave to amend. In August 2004, the plaintiffs agreed to dismiss these lawsuits without prejudice.
40
Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of matters to a Vote of Security Holders
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) |
Exhibit |
Description |
||||
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||||
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||||
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||||
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||||
(b) Reports on Form 8-K: |
| Form 8-K (Item 7 and 12 reported) filed August 3, 2004* |
* | Information furnished in this Form 8-K is not deemed to be filed herewith or incorporated by reference into any filing. |
41
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
CIENA CORPORATION | ||||
Date: August 19, 2004
|
By: | /s/ Gary B. Smith | ||
Gary B. Smith | ||||
President, Chief Executive Officer | ||||
and Director | ||||
(Duly Authorized Officer) | ||||
Date: August 19, 2004
|
By: | /s/ Joseph R. Chinnici
|
||
Joseph R. Chinnici | ||||
Senior Vice President, Finance and | ||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||
(Principal Financial Officer) |
42