UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
[X] | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004
[ ] | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 0-9756
RIGGS NATIONAL
CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 52-1217953 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
1503 Pennsylvania Avenue,
N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(202) 835-4309
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months
(or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes X No
.
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is an accelerated filer
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes
X No .
Indicate the number of shares
outstanding of each of the issuers classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Common Stock, $2.50 par value | 29,261,346 | |
(Title of Class) | (Outstanding at July 31, 2004) |
Transitional Small Business
Format Yes___. No x .
RIGGS NATIONAL CORPORATION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION | PAGE NO. | ||||||||
Item 1. | Financial Statements | |||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited) Three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 |
3 | |||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Condition
(Unaudited) June 30, 2004 and 2003 and December 31, 2003 |
4 | |||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Shareholders Equity (Unaudited) Six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 |
5 | |||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited) Six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 |
6 | |||||||||
Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements (Unaudited) |
7-23 | |||||||||
Item 2. | Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
23-37 | ||||||||
Item 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk | 38-41 | ||||||||
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures | 41 | ||||||||
PART II. | OTHER INFORMATION | |||||||||
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings | 41 | ||||||||
Item 2. | Change in Securities | 42 | ||||||||
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities | 42 | ||||||||
Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders | 42 | ||||||||
Item 5. | Other Information | 43 | ||||||||
Item 6. | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K | 43 | ||||||||
Signatures
|
43 |
Unless otherwise indicated, all references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to Riggs and the Company refer to Riggs National Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries.
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-UNAUDITED | THREE MONTHS ENDED | SIX MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||||||
RIGGS NATIONAL CORPORATION CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) |
JUNE 30, |
JUNE 30, |
|||||||||||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||
INTEREST
INCOME |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and Fees on
Loans |
$ | 38,213 | $ | 39,055 | $ | 76,674 | $ | 79,600 | |||||||||||||
Interest and
Dividends on Securities Held to Maturity |
1,096 | | 2,646 | | |||||||||||||||||
Interest and
Dividends on Securities Available for Sale |
16,384 | 18,480 | 32,880 | 37,451 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest on Time
Deposits with Other Banks |
166 | 220 | 181 | 383 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest on Federal
Funds Sold and Reverse Repurchase Agreements |
648 | 1,120 | 880 | 3,304 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Interest
Income |
56,507 | 58,875 | 113,261 | 120,738 | |||||||||||||||||
INTEREST
EXPENSE |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Interest on
Deposits: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Savings and NOW
Accounts |
130 | 103 | 256 | 268 | |||||||||||||||||
Money Market Deposit
Accounts |
1,495 | 3,684 | 3,849 | 7,066 | |||||||||||||||||
Time Deposits in
Domestic Offices |
2,784 | 4,340 | 5,274 | 10,271 | |||||||||||||||||
Time Deposits in
Foreign Offices |
468 | 651 | 883 | 1,292 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Interest on
Deposits |
4,877 | 8,778 | 10,262 | 18,897 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest on
Short-Term Borrowings and Long-Term Debt: |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase
Agreements and Other Short-Term Borrowings |
2,281 | 2,348 | 4,509 | 3,585 | |||||||||||||||||
FHLB Borrowings and
Other Long-Term Debt |
10,097 | 3,525 | 20,102 | 7,438 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Interest on
Short-Term Borrowings and Long-Term Debt |
12,378 | 5,873 | 24,611 | 11,023 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Interest
Expense |
17,255 | 14,651 | 34,873 | 29,920 | |||||||||||||||||
Net Interest
Income |
39,252 | 44,224 | 78,388 | 90,818 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for Loan
Losses |
| 815 | | 2,215 | |||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income
after Provision for Loan Losses |
39,252 | 43,409 | 78,388 | 88,603 | |||||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST
INCOME |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Trust and Investment
Advisory Income |
9,385 | 9,453 | 18,796 | 18,765 | |||||||||||||||||
Service Charges and
Fees |
12,534 | 11,634 | 25,276 | 23,550 | |||||||||||||||||
Venture Capital
Investment Gains (Losses), Net |
2,009 | (436 | ) | 1,841 | (2,658 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Other Noninterest
Income |
1,737 | 2,079 | 4,031 | 3,838 | |||||||||||||||||
Securities Gains,
Net |
| 6,507 | 226 | 11,134 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest
Income |
25,665 | 29,237 | 50,170 | 54,629 | |||||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST
EXPENSE |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and
Employee Benefits |
29,701 | 26,059 | 59,347 | 52,930 | |||||||||||||||||
Occupancy,
Net |
5,303 | 4,669 | 10,467 | 9,633 | |||||||||||||||||
Data Processing
Services |
1,664 | 4,907 | 3,276 | 10,062 | |||||||||||||||||
Furniture, Equipment
and Software |
7,239 | 3,392 | 10,709 | 7,085 | |||||||||||||||||
Regulatory
Fine |
25,000 | | 25,000 | | |||||||||||||||||
Legal
Fees |
4,536 | 1,545 | 5,140 | 1,969 | |||||||||||||||||
Consultants |
4,046 | 4,402 | 4,932 | 6,172 | |||||||||||||||||
Other Noninterest
Expense |
23,136 | 13,567 | 38,595 | 26,936 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest
Expense |
100,625 | 58,541 | 157,466 | 114,787 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) before
Taxes and Minority Interest |
(35,708 | ) | 14,105 | (28,908 | ) | 28,445 | |||||||||||||||
Applicable Income
Tax Expense (Benefit) |
(5,476 | ) | 4,236 | (3,825 | ) | 9,250 | |||||||||||||||
Minority Interest in
Income of Subsidiaries, Net of Taxes |
1,031 | 3,544 | 1,774 | 7,075 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from
Continuing Operations |
$ | (31,263 | ) | $ | 6,325 | $ | (26,857 | ) | $ | 12,120 | |||||||||||
Loss from
Discontinued Operations |
(3,156 | ) | (4,603 | ) | (3,671 | ) | (4,486 | ) | |||||||||||||
Applicable Income
Tax Benefit |
(44 | ) | (47 | ) | (68 | ) | (64 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Loss from
Discontinued Operations |
(3,112 | ) | (4,556 | ) | (3,603 | ) | (4,422 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net Income
(Loss) |
$ | (34,375 | ) | $ | 1,769 | $ | (30,460 | ) | $ | 7,698 | |||||||||||
EARNINGS
(LOSS) PER SHARE-CONTINUING OPERATIONS |
Basic | $ | (1.07 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | (0.93 | ) | $ | 0.42 | ||||||||||
Diluted | (1.07 | ) | 0.22 | (0.93 | ) | 0.42 | |||||||||||||||
EARNINGS
(LOSS) PER SHARE-DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
Basic | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | ||||||||
Diluted | (0.11 | ) | (0.16 | ) | (0.12 | ) | (0.15 | ) | |||||||||||||
EARNINGS
(LOSS) PER SHARE- |
Basic | $ | (1.18 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | (1.05 | ) | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||||
Diluted | (1.18 | ) | 0.06 | (1.05 | ) | 0.27 | |||||||||||||||
DIVIDENDS
DECLARED AND PAID PER SHARE |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.10 |
The
Accompanying Notes Are An Integral Part Of These Statements
|
3
RIGGS NATIONAL CORPORATION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(UNAUDITED) | JUNE 30, | DECEMBER 31, | JUNE 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS) | 2004 | 2003 | 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and Due from Banks | $ | 153,181 | $ | 325,975 | $ | 125,077 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Funds Sold and Reverse Repurchase Agreements | 374,000 | - | 1,053,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents | 527,181 | 325,975 | 1,178,077 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Deposits with Other Banks | 10,700 | 287,077 | 242,026 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities Held to Maturity (Fair Value of
$50,868 at June 30, 2004 and $115,319 at December 31, 2003) |
49,871 | 107,891 | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale (at Market Value) | 2,291,916 | 1,826,818 | 2,191,971 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Venture Capital Investments | 43,580 | 43,356 | 45,098 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans | 3,089,500 | 3,225,154 | 2,995,413 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reserve for Loan Losses | (25,801 | ) | (28,285 | ) | (26,385 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Net Loans | 3,063,699 | 3,196,869 | 2,969,028 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and Equipment, Net | 182,262 | 226,502 | 187,767 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets Held for Sale | 332,958 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets | 241,934 | 355,070 | 365,023 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets | $ | 6,744,101 | $ | 6,369,558 | $ | 7,178,990 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-Bearing Demand Deposits | $ | 1,290,159 | $ | 673,610 | $ | 622,098 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-Bearing Deposits: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Savings and NOW Accounts | 253,551 | 294,546 | 285,251 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Money Market Deposit Accounts | 1,919,634 | 2,378,779 | 2,338,335 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Deposits in Domestic Offices | 910,462 | 585,260 | 1,820,471 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time Deposits in Foreign Offices | 43,231 | 354,037 | 359,855 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Interest-Bearing Deposits | 3,126,878 | 3,612,622 | 4,803,912 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Deposits | 4,417,037 | 4,286,232 | 5,426,010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements and Other Short-Term Borrowings | 654,900 | 670,382 | 540,426 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities Held for Sale | 166,742 | - | - | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Liabilities | 116,411 | 127,091 | 156,386 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FHLB Borrowings and Other Long-Term Debt | 988,693 | 912,333 | 415,525 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities | 6,343,783 | 5,996,038 | 6,538,347 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GUARANTEED PREFERRED BENEFICIAL INTERESTS IN JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEFERRABLE INTEREST DEBENTURES | 72,634 | - | 248,584 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock-$2.50 Par Value | 6/30/2004 | 12/31/2003 | 6/30/2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Authorized Shares | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | 50,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issued Shares | 32,517,485 | 31,998,260 | 31,852,506 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Outstanding Shares | 29,175,564 | 28,680,138 | 28,536,418 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury Shares | 3,341,921 | 3,318,122 | 3,316,088 | 81,294 | 79,996 | 79,631 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional Paid in Capital | 179,113 | 174,396 | 171,272 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retained Earnings | 166,774 | 200,131 | 209,709 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) | (27,504 | ) | (9,380 | ) | 3,038 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Treasury Stock | (71,993 | ) | (71,623 | ) | (71,591 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Shareholders Equity | 327,684 | 373,520 | 392,059 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity | $ | 6,744,101 | $ | 6,369,558 | $ | 7,178,990 |
The Accompanying Notes Are An Integral Part Of These Statements
4
RIGGS NATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
COMMON | ACCUMULATED | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STOCK | ADDITIONAL | OTHER | TOTAL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ 2.50 | PAID IN | RETAINED | COMPREHENSIVE | TREASURY | SHAREHOLDERS | |||||||||||||||||||||||
PAR | CAPITAL | EARNINGS | INCOME (LOSS) | STOCK | EQUITY | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
$ | 79,530 | $ | 170,747 | $ | 204,865 | $ | 5,468 | $ | (71,369 | ) | $ | 389,241 | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income |
7,698 | 7,698 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized Loss on
Securities Available for Sale, Net
of Reclassification Adjustments |
(3,173 | ) | (3,173 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized Gain on Derivatives,
Net of Reclassification Adjustments |
653 | 653 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange Translation Adjustments |
90 | 90 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Other Comprehensive Loss |
(2,430 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Income |
5,268 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Common Stock for
Stock Option Plans 40,084 Shares |
101 | 525 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
Repurchase 14,290 shares |
(222 | ) | (222 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Dividends
Common Stock, $.10 per Share |
(2,854 | ) | (2,854 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2003 |
$ | 79,631 | $ | 171,272 | $ | 209,709 | $ | 3,038 | $ | (71,591 | ) | $ | 392,059 | |||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
$ | 79,996 | $ | 174,396 | $ | 200,131 | $ | (9,380 | ) | $ | (71,623 | ) | $ | 373,520 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Loss |
(30,460 | ) | (30,460 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Comprehensive Loss, Net of Tax: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
Loss on
Securities Available for Sale, Net
of Reclassification Adjustments |
(18,599 | ) | (18,599 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized Gain on Derivatives,
Net of Reclassification Adjustments |
930 | 930 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange Translation Adjustments |
(455 | ) | (455 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Other Comprehensive Loss |
(18,124 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Comprehensive Loss |
(48,584 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of Common Stock for
Stock Option and Award Plans-519,225 Shares |
1,298 | 5,265 | 6,563 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of
Trust Preferred Securities, Net |
(548 | ) | (548 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
Repurchase 23,799 shares |
(370 | ) | (370 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Dividends
Common Stock, $.10 per Share |
(2,897 | ) | (2,897 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2004 |
$ | 81,294 | $ | 179,113 | $ | 166,774 | $ | (27,504 | ) | $ | (71,993 | ) | $ | 327,684 |
The Accompanying Notes Are An Integral Part Of These Statements
5
RIGGS NATIONAL CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
(IN THOUSANDS)
SIX MONTHS ENDED | ||||||||
JUNE 30, |
||||||||
2004 | 2003 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | (30,460 | ) | $ | 7,698 | |||
Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Cash
Provided By Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses |
| 1,741 | ||||||
Writedown of Fixed Asset to Fair Value |
7,128 | | ||||||
(Gains) Losses on Venture Capital Investments |
(1,841 | ) | 2,658 | |||||
Depreciation Expense and Amortization of Leasehold Improvements |
12,213 | 8,525 | ||||||
Net Gains on Sales of Securities Available for Sale |
(226 | ) | (11,134 | ) | ||||
(Increase) Decrease in Other Assets |
168 | (11,740 | ) | |||||
Increase (Decrease) in Other Liabilities |
(6,106 | ) | 4,315 | |||||
Total Adjustments |
11,336 | (5,635 | ) | |||||
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Operating Activities |
(19,124 | ) | 2,063 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net Decrease (Increase) in Time Deposits with Other Banks |
145,624 | (38,759 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from Maturities of Securities Available for Sale |
17,314,024 | 5,708,631 | ||||||
Proceeds from Sales of Securities Available for Sale |
336,446 | 284,980 | ||||||
Purchases of Securities Available for Sale |
(18,031,661 | ) | (5,952,156 | ) | ||||
Purchases of Securities Held to Maturity |
(14,331 | ) | | |||||
Purchases of Venture Capital Investments |
(1,788 | ) | (2,073 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from Sale of Venture Capital Investments |
3,405 | 3,736 | ||||||
Net (Increase) Decrease in Loans |
(19,498 | ) | 10,161 | |||||
Proceeds from Sale of OREO |
132 | 606 | ||||||
Net Increase in Premises and Equipment |
(13,809 | ) | (5,577 | ) | ||||
Other, Net |
23 | 55 | ||||||
Net Cash (Used In) Provided By Investing Activities |
(281,433 | ) | 9,604 | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Net Increase in Non-Time Deposits |
160,979 | 65,241 | ||||||
Net Increase in Time Deposits |
130,883 | 121,772 | ||||||
Net (Decrease) Increase in Short-Term Borrowings |
(26,764 | ) | 54 | |||||
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank and Other Long-Term Borrowings |
242,000 | 127,000 | ||||||
Proceeds from the Issuance of Common Stock |
4,111 | 626 | ||||||
Dividend Payments |
(2,897 | ) | (2,854 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of Common Stock |
(370 | ) | (222 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests
in Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures |
(5,724 | ) | | |||||
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities |
502,218 | 311,617 | ||||||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes |
(455 | ) | 90 | |||||
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents |
201,206 | 323,374 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Period |
325,975 | 854,703 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period |
$ | 527,181 | $ | 1,178,077 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES: |
||||||||
Trade Dated Securities Purchases |
$ | | $ | 34,234 | ||||
Trade Dated Securities Sales |
126,993 | |||||||
Interest Paid |
34,609 | 31,037 | ||||||
Cash Held for Sale |
7,037 | | ||||||
Non-cash
Assets transferred to Held for Sale |
325,921 | | ||||||
Liabilities
transferred to Held for Sale |
166,742 | |
The Accompanying Notes Are An Integral Part Of These Statements |
6
RIGGS NATIONAL CORPORATION
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
(TABLES IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AMOUNTS)
NOTE 1.
|
BASIS OF PRESENTATION |
The interim consolidated financial statements presented in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and follow general practice within the banking industry. These principles have been applied on a consistent basis and include all normal recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present the Companys results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. The preparation of financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported. Actual results could differ from those estimates and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for all of 2004. For comparability, certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. These reclassifications include those resulting from the 2004 announcement that the Company would discontinue the operations of several of its business subsidiaries and divisions as discussed below. The financial statements contained herein should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and accompanying notes in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
NOTE 2.
|
EXIT FROM INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS |
As noted in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, Riggs had intentions to exit or sell most of its international banking business and focus its remaining embassy banking business on a select client base. Subsequent to June 30, 2004, the Company announced it would completely exit its foreign embassy banking relationships either through a sale or wind-down of activities. Accordingly, Riggs is pursuing a buyer for its London and Channel Islands operations, closing its Miami office and exiting its foreign embassy relationships. The Company is also selling its corporate aircraft used in support of its international operations.
The operating results of the London and Channel Islands operations, which are classified as held for sale and which include all recurring operating results as well as specific exit-related expenses identified in the following paragraph, are reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The operating results of Miami and the embassy business, which include the expenses identified in the following paragraph, are reported in results from continuing operations. The operating results of the embassy business and Miami are included in continuing operations since they do not meet the accounting criteria for discontinued operations.
As part of the exit from its international business, Riggs accrued approximately $2.3 million of employee severance costs in the quarter ended June 30, 2004. This severance is payable under the terms of an existing Company policy and is therefore accrued in accordance with SFAS No. 112 (Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits). In addition, the Company recorded approximately $500 thousand of employee retention costs which are accrued in accordance with SFAS No. 146 (Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities). The Company anticipates recording approximately $900 thousand of additional retention expense in the second half of 2004. The Company also recorded approximately $300 thousand of additional exit-related expenses in the quarter ended June 30, 2004, most of which pertain to accruals for leasehold obligations at vacated properties and write-downs associated with abandoned fixed assets.
Approximately $800 thousand of the above expenses are included in results from continuing operations, impacting the Banking Segment, and approximately $2.3 million is included in the results of discontinued operations, impacting the International Banking Segment.
The Company recorded an impairment charge on its corporate aircraft that is held for sale of $7.1 million during the second quarter of 2004. The amount of this charge was based upon an offer to purchase reduced by estimated selling costs. Consistent with its policy of allocating the operating costs of the aircraft, 45% of the impairment charge was allocated to the International Banking Segment, 25% of the impairment charge was allocated across all segments as part of general corporate overhead and 30% was charged to the Other Segment.
As noted above, the Company is attempting to sell its London and Channel Islands operations. If a buyer cannot be found, Riggs will wind down these operations. A wind down would result in increased costs primarily related to the London pension plan and lease breakage fees. The Company estimates that these increased costs are approximately $8.0 to $11.0 million.
7
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
The assets and liabilities that are held for sale at London and the Channel Islands at June 30, 2004, which are valued in the aggregate at the lower of cost or estimated market value include:
Assets: |
||||
Cash |
$ | 7,037 | ||
Time Deposits with Other Banks |
130,753 | |||
Loans |
152,558 | |||
Bank Premises and Equipment |
39,124 | |||
Other Assets |
3,486 | |||
Total |
$ | 332,958 | ||
Liabilities: |
||||
Noninterest-Bearing Demand Deposits |
$ | 21,128 | ||
Interest-Bearing Deposits |
139,929 | |||
Other Liabilities |
5,685 | |||
Total |
$ | 166,742 | ||
NOTE 3.
|
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES |
Management of the Company has prepared the consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applied on a consistent basis and which follow general practice within the banking industry. Accordingly, management of the Company is required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that it believes to be reasonable based upon the information available. These estimates, judgments and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net interest income, the provision for loan losses, noninterest income and noninterest expense during the periods presented. Based on its consideration of accounting policies that involve the most complex and subjective estimates and assumptions, as well as its analysis of whether and to what extent such estimates and assumptions will have a material impact on the Companys financial condition or results of operations, management has identified the following critical accounting policies. Due to uncertainty inherent in these matters, actual results of future operations could differ from the estimates, judgments and assumptions used in applying these critical accounting policies.
Reserve for Loan Losses
The reserve for loan losses is maintained at a level deemed the best estimate adequate to absorb probable losses in the loan portfolio. The
determination of the reserve for loan losses is based upon an on-going, analytical review of the loan portfolio. This analysis requires application of
judgment, subjective evaluation of economic uncertainties and assessment of business conditions that may change. Because of these and other factors,
adjustments to the reserve for loan losses may be required.
The analytical review of the loan portfolio performed to determine the adequacy of the reserve for loan losses includes a review of loans with balances over $250 thousand for impairment, an analysis of historical loss experience by loan type, an evaluation of current economic conditions and other factors considered pertinent to the analysis. Impaired loans are defined as those credits where the Company has determined it probable that all amounts due in accordance with the loan agreements will not be collected or recovered from the disposition of collateral. Impaired loans are generally commercial and financial loans and commercial real estate loans and are usually on non-accrual status. Each impaired loan with an outstanding balance equal to or greater than $250 thousand has a specific, identified loan loss reserve associated with it or has been written down to its estimated net realizable value. Impaired loans do not include groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans with similar collateral characteristics, such as residential mortgage and home equity loans. Loss reserves for these types of loans are established on an aggregate basis using historical loss experience and other factors deemed relevant to the analysis. Balances related to impaired loans for which there are specific reserves are excluded when applying historical loss ratios to determine loan loss reserves.
The specific reserves for impaired loans, if any, are included in the reserve for loan losses. Impaired loans are valued based upon the fair value of the related collateral if the loans are collateral dependent. For all other impaired loans, the specific reserves are based on the present values of expected cash flows discounted at each loans initial effective interest rate.
8
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
Provisions to the reserve for loan losses are charged against, or credited to, earnings in amounts necessary to maintain an adequate reserve for loan losses. Commercial loans are charged-off when it is determined that they cannot be fully recovered and non-commercial loans are generally charged-off or loan foreclosure proceedings begun upon becoming 120 days delinquent or at such time as permitted by law or other regulations. Recoveries of loans previously charged-off are credited to the reserve for loan losses.
The Company maintains its reserve for loan losses in accordance with a policy approved by the Board of Directors. The Company has an established methodology for analyzing its reserve for loan losses that includes an internal loan classification policy. The Company periodically evaluates the appropriateness of its loan loss methodology to ascertain that it produces accurate assessments of probable loan losses. Domestic and international loans are subjected to similar review procedures.
While the Company believes its credit monitoring procedures are adequate, credit losses are, however, inherent to the business, and it is possible there may be unidentified losses in the loan portfolio at June 30, 2004 that may become apparent at a later date pursuant to additional internal analysis or pursuant to comment following regulatory examination. The establishment of loan loss reserves for problem credits that are currently unidentified or unanticipated would negatively impact future earnings. A charge, if any is needed, would generally be recorded in the segment in which the loan is recorded.
Venture Capital Investments
Venture capital investments are accounted for at fair value with gains and losses included in noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations.
At June 30, 2004, the Company valued its venture capital portfolio at $43.6 million. This valuation was arrived at using a variety of factors including, but not limited to, market prices, where available, and discounted, if necessary, to reflect trading history, lock-up provisions, lack of market liquidity and other factors; cost, if there is no readily determinable market price and there has not been a material event, such as a follow-on round of financing or strategic sale; a value higher than cost if indicated by additional financing which fulfills certain requirements; an offer to purchase; and analysis and commentary from a funds Investment Manager/General Partner. The largest investment in the venture capital portfolio is valued at $3.7 million at June 30, 2004.
Because the Company has no present intention to sell or liquidate the venture capital portfolio, the valuation of venture capital investments is subject to uncertainty in that it does not represent a negotiated value between the Company, as seller, and an independent and willing buyer that has the necessary knowledge and financial ability to complete the purchase. Additionally, if the Company attempted to sell its venture capital portfolio, particularly if it deemed it necessary to liquidate the investments within a short period of time, the actual proceeds from the sale could differ significantly from the recorded carrying value. The market for the type of venture capital investments Riggs holds has since 2000 been impacted by a slow economy, a depressed domestic equity market in which, notwithstanding the recent recovery of stock prices, the values of publicly traded companies have declined. Because of these market conditions, there has been a decline in the number of initial public offerings and acquisitions of private companies by publicly traded firms. The gradual improvement in these sectors has begun to afford the Company better liquidation opportunities and it continues to actively manage the portfolio to maximize current valuations. Although these and other factors have been assessed in determining current values, because of the subjectivity in determining values, it is possible that the Company would experience a loss if it chose to liquidate its venture capital portfolio, particularly if it attempted to do so quickly. The loss, if any, would be recorded in the Riggs Capital Partners segment.
9
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
Deferred Taxes
The Company records a provision for income taxes based upon the amount of current taxes payable (or refundable) and the change in net deferred
tax assets or liabilities during the year. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax effects of differing carrying values of
assets and
liabilities for tax and financial statement reporting purposes that will reverse in future periods. When substantial uncertainty exists concerning
the
recoverability of a deferred tax asset, the carrying value of the asset is reduced by a valuation allowance. Establishing a valuation allowance
results in
an increase in income tax expense.
Unrealized losses in venture capital operations have resulted in the maintenance of $11.4 million of deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2004. These assets can be utilized to reduce taxes payable on future capital gains but must be utilized within five years of the year in which the loss is realized for tax return purposes. Because of continuing losses in the venture capital portfolio and the lack of current suitability of alternatives to generate capital gains, Riggs has established a valuation allowance of $6.9 million against the deferred tax asset at June 30, 2004. The Company believes that the unreserved deferred tax asset balance of $4.5 million at June 30, 2004, which includes a deferred tax asset related to realized losses of $2.8 million, will be realized through generation of future net capital gains within its venture capital operations or the implementation of alternative business strategies that generate net capital gains. Management has identified several alternative business strategies that could produce sufficient capital gains to allow the unreserved deferred tax asset balance to be realized.
If sufficient net capital gains within the Companys venture capital operations are not realized in a timely manner, or if business conditions or other factors make it impossible, impractical or imprudent to implement alternative strategies, an additional valuation allowance, resulting in a charge against income for that portion of the deferred tax asset which will not be utilized, will be recorded in the Other segment.
Gain and Loss Contingencies
The Company evaluates gain and loss contingencies in accordance with SFAS No. 5 (Accounting for Contingencies) and, when necessary, FASB
Interpretation No. 14 (Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5).
Gain contingencies are not recognized in the financial statements until the gain is realized, but the Company does evaluate the need to disclose such contingent gains in the notes to the financial statements. Loss contingencies are categorized as remote, reasonably possible or probable of occurring. Contingent losses for which chances of occurrence are remote are neither recognized nor disclosed in the financial statements. Possible contingencies are not recorded in the financial statements but, if material, are disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. Loss contingencies that are likely to occur are deemed probable of occurring. Probable loss contingencies that are material are recorded as liabilities in the financial statements at the estimated amount of the loss if such loss can be reasonably estimated. If no reasonable estimate of the loss can be made, but a range of possible losses can be reasonably ascertained, the minimum estimated loss will be accrued and the Company describes in its disclosure the remaining loss contingency.
The determination that a contingency is remote, reasonably probable or probable of occurring is made by the Company based upon known and pertinent knowledge which is deemed reliable. Additional information, or interpretations of knowledge previously deemed reliable, could become known at a future date which may cause the Company to reassess its evaluation of the contingency occurring.
For a discussion of the more significant risk factors that impact Riggs, or could impact Riggs, see Item 7 of the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Valuation of Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale
Assets and liabilities that are held for sale are valued at the lower of cost or market value. Market values have been determined by a variety of methodologies which the Company deems appropriate to arrive at an estimate of aggregate market value. The valuation of assets and liabilities held for sale do not, however, represent an offer to purchase these assets and liabilities from a willing and capable buyer. Actual proceeds from a sale, therefore, may be less than the carrying values.
10
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
NOTE 4.
|
EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE |
Earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations are as follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2004 |
JUNE 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||
BASIC | DILUTED | BASIC | DILUTED | |||||||||||||||||
EPS | EPS | EPS | EPS | |||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
$ | (31,263 | ) | $ | (31,263 | ) | $ | 6,325 | $ | 6,325 | ||||||||||
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
29,143,341 | 29,143,341 | 28,534,363 | 28,534,363 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average Dilutive Effect
of Stock-Based Compensation Plans |
n/a | n/a | n/a | 458,817 | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
29,143,341 | 29,143,341 | 28,534,363 | 28,993,180 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) Per Share-Continuing Operations |
$ | (1.07 | ) | $ | (1.07 | ) | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.22 |
SIX MONTHS ENDED | SIX MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2004 |
JUNE 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||
BASIC | DILUTED | BASIC | DILUTED | |||||||||||||||||
EPS | EPS | EPS | EPS | |||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
$ | (26,857 | ) | $ | (26,857 | ) | $ | 12,120 | $ | 12,120 | ||||||||||
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
28,994,350 | 28,994,350 | 28,531,253 | 28,531,253 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average Dilutive Effect
of Stock-Based Compensation Plans |
n/a | n/a | n/a | 449,607 | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
28,994,350 | 28,994,350 | 28,531,253 | 28,980,860 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) Per Share-Continuing Operations |
$ | (0.93 | ) | $ | (0.93 | ) | $ | 0.42 | $ | 0.42 |
Earnings (loss) per share from discontinued operations are as follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2004 |
JUNE 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||
BASIC | DILUTED | BASIC | DILUTED | |||||||||||||||||
EPS | EPS | EPS | EPS | |||||||||||||||||
Net Loss from Discontinued Operations |
$ | (3,156 | ) | $ | (3,156 | ) | $ | (4,603 | ) | $ | (4,603 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
29,143,341 | 29,143,341 | 28,534,363 | 28,534,363 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average Dilutive Effect
of Stock-Based Compensation Plans |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
29,143,341 | 29,143,341 | 28,534,363 | 28,534,363 | ||||||||||||||||
Loss Per Share-Discontinued Operations |
$ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.11 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.16 | ) |
SIX MONTHS ENDED | SIX MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2004 |
JUNE 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||
BASIC | DILUTED | BASIC | DILUTED | |||||||||||||||||
EPS | EPS | EPS | EPS | |||||||||||||||||
Net Loss from Discontinued Operations |
$ | (3,671 | ) | $ | (3,671 | ) | $ | (4,486 | ) | $ | (4,486 | ) | ||||||||
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
28,994,350 | 28,994,350 | 28,531,253 | 28,531,253 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average Dilutive Effect
of Stock-Based Compensation Plans |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
28,994,350 | 28,994,350 | 28,531,253 | 28,531,253 | ||||||||||||||||
Loss Per Share-Discontinued Operations |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.12 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) |
11
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
Earnings (loss) per share are as follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2004 |
JUNE 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||
BASIC | DILUTED | BASIC | DILUTED | |||||||||||||||||
EPS | EPS | EPS | EPS | |||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders |
$ | (34,375 | ) | $ | (34,375 | ) | $ | 1,769 | $ | 1,769 | ||||||||||
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
29,143,341 | 29,143,341 | 28,534,363 | 28,534,363 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average Dilutive Effect
of Stock-Based Compensation Plans |
n/a | n/a | n/a | 458,817 | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
29,143,341 | 29,143,341 | 28,534,363 | 28,993,180 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
$ | (1.18 | ) | $ | (1.18 | ) | $ | 0.06 | $ | 0.06 |
SIX MONTHS ENDED | SIX MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2004 |
JUNE 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||
BASIC | DILUTED | BASIC | DILUTED | |||||||||||||||||
EPS | EPS | EPS | EPS | |||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders |
$ | (30,460 | ) | $ | (30,460 | ) | $ | 7,698 | $ | 7,698 | ||||||||||
Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
28,994,350 | 28,994,350 | 28,531,253 | 28,531,253 | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted-Average Dilutive Effect
of Stock-Based Compensation Plans |
n/a | n/a | n/a | 449,607 | ||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Weighted-Average Shares Outstanding |
28,994,350 | 28,994,350 | 28,531,253 | 28,980,860 | ||||||||||||||||
Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
$ | (1.05 | ) | $ | (1.05 | ) | $ | 0.27 | $ | 0.27 |
12
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
At the end of June 2003, approximately 3.7 million stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would be anti-dilutive. All stock options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share at June 30, 2004, because the effect would be anti-dilutive. The weighted average exercise price for these options was $15.61 per share and $18.76 per share at the end of the same respective periods. During the third quarter of 2004, approximately 3,491,307 options at a weighted-average strike price of $16.18 will expire. The Company expects that a significant portion of these options will be exercised.
Stock-Based Employee Compensation Plans
At June 30, 2004, the Company had five stock-option plans which are described more fully in Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in its 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company accounts for these plans under the recognition and measurement principles of
APB Opinion No. 25 (Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees), SFAS No. 148 (Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and
Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123) and related interpretations. There is no stock-based compensation expense for these plans
reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as all options granted under these plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant. The Company has also awarded time vested and performance based restricted shares. Expense related
to time-vested and performance-based stock awards are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table illustrates the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation) to stock-based employee compensation.
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, |
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, |
|||||||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations, as reported |
($31,263 | ) | $ | 6,325 | ($26,857 | ) | $ | 12,120 | ||||||||
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported
net income, net of related tax effects |
492 | 749 | 651 | 539 | ||||||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
(582 | ) | (1,367 | ) | (1,482 | ) | (2,178 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
($31,353 | ) | $ | 5,707 | ($27,688 | ) | $ | 10,481 | ||||||||
Earnings (Loss) per share-Continuing Operations
|
||||||||||||||||
Basic-as reported |
($1.07 | ) | $ | 0.22 | ($0.93 | ) | $ | 0.42 | ||||||||
Basic-pro forma |
($1.08 | ) | $ | 0.20 | ($0.95 | ) | $ | 0.37 | ||||||||
Diluted-as reported |
($1.07 | ) | $ | 0.22 | ($0.93 | ) | $ | 0.42 | ||||||||
Diluted-pro forma |
($1.08 | ) | $ | 0.20 | ($0.95 | ) | $ | 0.36 | ||||||||
THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, |
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, | |||||||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) | 2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss), available to common shareholders, as reported |
($34,375 | ) | $ | 1,769 | ($30,460 | ) | $ | 7,698 | ||||||||
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported
net income, net of related tax effects |
492 | 749 | 651 | 539 | ||||||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects |
(582 | ) | (1,267 | ) | (1,482 | ) | (2,178 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
($34,465 | ) | $ | 1,251 | ($31,291 | ) | $ | 6,059 | ||||||||
Earnings (Loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic-as reported |
($1.18 | ) | $ | 0.06 | ($1.05 | ) | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||
Basic-pro forma |
($1.18 | ) | $ | 0.04 | ($1.08 | ) | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||
Diluted-as reported |
($1.18 | ) | $ | 0.06 | ($1.05 | ) | $ | 0.27 | ||||||||
Diluted-pro forma |
($1.18 | ) | $ | 0.04 | ($1.08 | ) | $ | 0.21 | ||||||||
At June 30, 2004, there were 936,339 unvested options outstanding. Upon a change of control, as defined in the 2002 Long-Term Incentive Plan, all options become fully vested. There were 7,528,405 stock options outstanding at June 30, 2004 with an exercise price range of $10.00 to $30.25 and a weighted average exercise price of $15.61.
13
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
NOTE 5.
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) |
BEFORE - | TAX | |||||||||||
TAX | (EXPENSE) | NET-OF-TAX | ||||||||||
AMOUNT | BENEFIT | AMOUNT | ||||||||||
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003: |
||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments |
$ | 138 | $ | (48 | ) | $ | 90 | |||||
Unrealized Gains on Securities: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized Holding Gains Arising During Period |
6,268 | (2,204 | ) | 4,064 | ||||||||
Reclassification Adjustment for Gains Realized in Net Income |
(11,134 | ) | 3,897 | (7,237 | ) | |||||||
Net
Unrealized Loss on Securities |
(4,866 | ) | 1,693 | (3,173 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized Gains on Derivatives: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized Holding Gains Arising During Period |
1,005 | (352 | ) | 653 | ||||||||
Reclassification Adjustment for Gains Realized in Net Income |
| | | |||||||||
Net
Unrealized Gains on Derivatives |
1,005 | (352 | ) | 653 | ||||||||
Other Comprehensive Loss |
$ | (3,723 | ) | $ | 1,293 | $ | (2,430 | ) | ||||
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004: |
||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments |
$ | (700 | ) | $ | 245 | $ | (455 | ) | ||||
Unrealized Losses on Securities: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized Holding Losses Arising During Period |
(28,169 | ) | 9,717 | (18,452 | ) | |||||||
Reclassification Adjustment for Gains Realized in Net Income |
(226 | ) | 79 | (147 | ) | |||||||
Net Unrealized Losses on Securities |
(28,395 | ) | 9,796 | (18,599 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized Gains on Derivatives: |
||||||||||||
Unrealized Holding Gains Arising During Period |
1,431 | (501 | ) | 930 | ||||||||
Reclassification Adjustment for Gains Realized in Net Income |
| | | |||||||||
Net Unrealized Gains on Derivatives |
1,431 | (501 | ) | 930 | ||||||||
Other Comprehensive Loss |
$ | (27,664 | ) | $ | 9,540 | $ | (18,124 | ) |
Tax (expense) benefit reflects a blended tax rate of 35% for the gain (loss) recorded in the U.S. and 30% for the gain (loss) recorded in the U.K.
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) BALANCES
UNREALIZED | ||||||||||||||||
GAIN (LOSS) | UNREALIZED | UNREALIZED | ACCUMULATED | |||||||||||||
ON FOREIGN | GAIN (LOSS) | GAIN (LOSS) | OTHER | |||||||||||||
CURRENCY | ON | ON | COMPREHENSIVE | |||||||||||||
TRANSLATIONS | SECURITIES | DERIVATIVES | INCOME (LOSS) | |||||||||||||
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003: |
||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2002 |
$ | (4,154 | ) | $ | 12,746 | $ | (3,124 | ) | $ | 5,468 | ||||||
Period Change |
90 | (3,173 | ) | 653 | (2,430 | ) | ||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2003 |
$ | (4,064 | ) | $ | 9,573 | $ | (2,471 | ) | $ | 3,038 | ||||||
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004: |
||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2003 |
$ | (2,687 | ) | $ | (5,203 | ) | $ | (1,490 | ) | $ | (9,380 | ) | ||||
Period Change |
(455 | ) | (18,599 | ) | 930 | (18,124 | ) | |||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2004 |
$ | (3,142 | ) | $ | (23,802 | ) | $ | (560) | $ | (27,504 | ) |
14
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
NOTE 6:
|
SEGMENT INFORMATION |
The Companys reportable segments are strategic business units that provide diverse products and services within the financial services industry. Riggs has five reportable segments: Banking, International Banking, Treasury, Riggs Capital Partners (venture capital) and Other. The Company accounts for and evaluates its segments on a functional basis, rather than a legal entity basis. Accordingly, revenue and expenses from a single legal entity may impact multiple segments.
Except for the utilization of funds transfer pricing and cost allocation methodologies, the accounting policies for the segments are substantially the same as those described in Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Riggs accounts for intercompany transactions as if the transactions were to third parties under market conditions. Overhead and support expenses are allocated to each operating segment based on number of employees, service usage and other factors relevant to the expense incurred. Geographic financial information is provided in Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Revenue and expense allocation formulas and funds transfer pricing methodologies may change. If necessary, prior periods are restated to reflect material changes in the components of the segments. Prior periods are not restated, however, to reflect changes in revenue and cost allocations or funds transfer pricing methodologies. In addition, revenues and expenses which are unusual or noncontrollable may be reflected in the Other segment, which is consistent with internal financial reporting, if management believes such presentation most accurately represents the remaining operating segments performance. Beginning in the first quarter of 2004, the segment previously reported as Riggs & Co. is, due to an organizational realignment, included in the Banking segment. Prior periods have been adjusted to reflect this change. Prior periods have also been adjusted to reflect discontinued operations as a result of the Companys 2004 decision to sell or exit its international operations.
Reconciliations are provided from the segment totals to the consolidated financial statements. The reconciliation of total average assets represents the elimination of intercompany transactions.
Following are brief descriptions of the segments:
Banking
The Banking Segment provides both community and wholesale banking services. Community banking includes traditional branch banking operations,
private banking to high net worth individuals, small business banking, trust and broker-dealer services, mortgage and consumer lending and merchant
card services. Wholesale banking provides banking services for middle market and commercial real estate customers, not-for-profit organizations,
government contractors and embassy and diplomatic customers. Wholesale banking also provides cash management services, investment
management services (through Riggs Investment Advisors) and (through
its Multi-Employer Property Trust unit) as trustee to a commingled real estate
fund.
The Banking Segment operations at June 30, 2004 are primarily conducted through 49 branch offices and 151 ATMs in and around Washington, D.C.
International Banking
As previously noted, Riggs will exit or sell its international banking business. Riggs is pursuing a buyer for its London and Channel Islands operations, closing its Edge Act chartered subsidiary in Miami and exiting its foreign embassy relationships.
Treasury
The Treasury Segment is responsible for asset and liability management throughout the Company including management of the securities portfolio,
foreign exchange activities, wholesale funding, overall management of interest rate risk and facilitation of the funds transfer pricing component
for segment reporting.
15
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
Riggs Capital Partners
Riggs Capital Partners represents the Companys venture capital operations, which specialize in equity investments in privately-held high-tech and
high-growth companies.
Other
The Other Segment consists of unallocated parent company income and expense, net interest income from unallocated equity, long-term debt,
trust preferred securities, foreclosed real estate activities and other revenue or expenses not attributable to one of the other segments.
THREE MONTHS | RIGGS | RIGGS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ENDED | INTERNATIONAL | CAPITAL | NATIONAL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2004 | BANKING | BANKING | TREASURY | PARTNERS | OTHER | RECONCILIATION | CORPORATION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income |
$ | 36,751 | $ | 2,064 | $ | 18,032 | $ | | $ | 6,042 | $ | (6,382 | ) | $ | 56,507 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
2,925 | 1,515 | 8,839 | | 10,358 | (6,382 | ) | 17,255 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Funds Transfer Income (Expense) |
(340 | ) | 9,109 | (9,441 | ) | | 672 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Loss) |
33,486 | 9,658 | (248 | ) | | (3,644 | ) | | 39,252 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Loss) after Provision |
$ | 33,486 | $ | 9,658 | $ | (248 | ) | $ | | $ | (3,644 | ) | $ | | $ | 39,252 | ||||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest Income-External
Customers |
$ | 21,380 | $ | 317 | $ | 796 | $ | 2,008 | $ | 1,164 | $ | 25,665 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment Noninterest Income |
670 | 336 | | | 479 | (1,485 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Income |
$ | 22,050 | $ | 653 | $ | 796 | $ | 2,008 | $ | 1,643 | $ | (1,485 | ) | $ | 25,665 | |||||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Depreciation and Amortization |
$ | 1,179 | $ | 70 | $ | 1 | $ | 3 | $ | 3,210 | $ | 4,463 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Expense |
22,882 | 3,522 | 1,161 | 149 | 69,933 | (1,485 | ) | 96,162 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overhead and Support |
24,262 | 28,828 | 532 | | (53,622 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Expense |
$ | 48,323 | $ | 32,420 | $ | 1,694 | $ | 152 | $ | 19,521 | $ | (1,485 | ) | $ | 100,625 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Taxes and Minority Interest |
$ | 7,213 | $ | (22,109 | ) | $ | (1,146 | ) | $ | 1,856 | $ | (21,522 | ) | $ | | $ | (35,708 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Taxes |
$ | 1,799 | $ | (1,117 | ) | $ | (280 | ) | $ | | $ | (5,878 | ) | $ | (5,476 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Minority Interest |
| | | 13 | 1,018 | 1,031 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
$ | 5,414 | $ | (20,992 | ) | $ | (866 | ) | $ | 1,843 | $ | (16,662 | ) | $ | | $ | (31,263 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Discontinued
Operations, net of taxes |
(3,112 | ) | | (3,112 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | 5,414 | $ | (24,104 | ) | $ | (866 | ) | $ | 1,843 | $ | (16,662 | ) | $ | | $ | (34,375 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total Average Assets |
$ | 3,688,993 | $ | 559,857 | $ | 2,819,766 | $ | 45,813 | $ | 653,045 | $ | (1,185,152 | ) | $ | 6,582,322 | |||||||||||||||||
16
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
THREE MONTHS | RIGGS | RIGGS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ENDED | INTERNATIONAL | CAPITAL | NATIONAL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2003 | BANKING | BANKING | TREASURY | PARTNERS | OTHER | RECONCILIATION | CORPORATION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income |
$ | 38,638 | $ | 3,292 | $ | 20,887 | $ | 3 | $ | 8,338 | $ | (12,283 | ) | $ | 58,875 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
6,729 | 4,678 | 5,998 | | 9,529 | (12,283 | ) | 14,651 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Funds Transfer Income (Expense) |
4,110 | 10,725 | (16,478 | ) | (744 | ) | 2,387 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Loss) |
36,019 | 9,339 | (1,589 | ) | (741 | ) | 1,196 | | 44,224 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses |
(722 | ) | (93 | ) | | | | (815 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Loss) after Provision |
$ | 35,297 | $ | 9,246 | $ | (1,589 | ) | $ | (741 | ) | $ | 1,196 | $ | | $ | 43,409 | ||||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest Income-External
Customers |
$ | 21,474 | $ | 718 | $ | 7,432 | $ | (400 | ) | $ | 13 | $ | 29,237 | |||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment Noninterest Income |
1,492 | 42 | | | 520 | (2,054 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Income |
$ | 22,966 | $ | 760 | $ | 7,432 | $ | (400 | ) | $ | 533 | $ | (2,054 | ) | $ | 29,237 | ||||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Depreciation and Amortization |
$ | 1,033 | $ | 43 | $ | 2 | $ | 4 | $ | 2,364 | $ | 3,446 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Expense |
26,558 | 3,872 | 992 | 218 | 25,509 | (2,054 | ) | 55,095 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overhead and Support |
21,653 | 2,696 | 768 | 107 | (25,224 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Expense |
$ | 49,244 | $ | 6,611 | $ | 1,762 | $ | 329 | $ | 2,649 | $ | (2,054 | ) | $ | 58,541 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Taxes and
Minority Interest |
$ | 9,019 | $ | 3,395 | $ | 4,081 | $ | (1,470 | ) | $ | (920 | ) | $ | | $ | 14,105 | ||||||||||||||||
Taxes |
$ | 2,344 | $ | 387 | $ | 1,452 | $ | | $ | 53 | $ | | $ | 4,236 | ||||||||||||||||||
Minority Interest |
| | | (4 | ) | 3,548 | 3,544 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
$ | 6,675 | $ | 3,008 | $ | 2,629 | $ | (1,466 | ) | $ | (4,521 | ) | $ | | $ | 6,325 | ||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Discontinued
Operations, net of taxes |
| (4,556 | ) | | | | | (4,556 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | 6,675 | $ | (1,548 | ) | $ | 2,629 | $ | (1,466 | ) | $ | (4,521 | ) | $ | | $ | 1,769 | |||||||||||||||
Total Average Assets |
$ | 3,530,263 | $ | 697,154 | $ | 3,046,921 | $ | 59,235 | $ | 802,416 | $ | (1,648,897 | ) | $ | 6,487,092 | |||||||||||||||||
17
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
SIX MONTHS | RIGGS | RIGGS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ENDED | INTERNATIONAL | CAPITAL | NATIONAL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2004 | BANKING | BANKING | TREASURY | PARTNERS | OTHER | RECONCILIATION | CORPORATION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income |
$ | 73,154 | $ | 5,151 | $ | 35,534 | $ | 1 | $ | 11,379 | $ | (11,958 | ) | $ | 113,261 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
5,929 | 4,858 | 15,335 | | 20,709 | (11,958 | ) | 34,873 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Funds Transfer Income (Expense) |
(1,377 | ) | 16,915 | (15,513 | ) | | (25 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Loss) |
65,848 | 17,208 | 4,686 | 1 | (9,355 | ) | | 78,388 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses |
| 2 | | | (2 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Loss) after Provision |
$ | 65,848 | $ | 17,210 | $ | 4,686 | $ | 1 | $ | (9,357 | ) | $ | | $ | 78,388 | |||||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest Income-External
Customers |
$ | 43,030 | $ | 875 | $ | 2,155 | $ | 1,841 | $ | 2,269 | $ | 50,170 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment Noninterest Income |
1,296 | 416 | | | 955 | (2,667 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Income |
$ | 44,326 | $ | 1,291 | $ | 2,155 | $ | 1,841 | $ | 3,224 | $ | (2,667 | ) | $ | 50,170 | |||||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Depreciation and Amortization |
$ | 2,325 | $ | 139 | $ | 2 | $ | 7 | $ | 6,005 | $ | 8,478 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Expense |
45,781 | 7,165 | 2,130 | 299 | 96,280 | (2,667 | ) | 148,988 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overhead and Support |
41,818 | 31,132 | 844 | | (73,794 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Expense |
$ | 89,924 | $ | 38,436 | $ | 2,976 | $ | 306 | $ | 28,491 | $ | (2,667 | ) | $ | 157,466 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Taxes and
Minority Interest |
$ | 20,250 | $ | (19,935 | ) | $ | 3,865 | $ | 1,536 | $ | (34,624 | ) | $ | | $ | (28,908 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Taxes |
$ | 5,654 | $ | (1,123 | ) | $ | 1,476 | $ | | $ | (9,832 | ) | $ | | $ | (3,825 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Minority Interest |
| | | 10 | 1,764 | 1,774 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
$ | 14,596 | $ | (18,812 | ) | $ | 2,389 | $ | 1,526 | $ | (26,556 | ) | $ | | $ | (26,857 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Discontinued
Operations, net of taxes |
| (3,603 | ) | | | | | (3,603 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | 14,596 | $ | (22,415 | ) | $ | 2,389 | $ | 1,526 | $ | (26,556 | ) | $ | | $ | (30,460 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Total Average Assets |
$ | 3,676,830 | $ | 604,676 | $ | 2,615,882 | $ | 45,657 | $ | 663,806 | $ | (1,194,899 | ) | $ | 6,411,952 | |||||||||||||||||
18
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
SIX MONTHS | RIGGS | RIGGS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ENDED | INTERNATIONAL | CAPITAL | NATIONAL | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2003 | BANKING | BANKING | TREASURY | PARTNERS | OTHER | RECONCILIATION | CORPORATION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income |
$ | 78,486 | $ | 6,240 | $ | 43,361 | $ | 8 | $ | 16,666 | $ | (24,023 | ) | $ | 120,738 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest Expense |
15,140 | 8,733 | 11,012 | | 19,058 | (24,023 | ) | 29,920 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Funds Transfer Income (Expense) |
11,526 | 20,356 | (35,301 | ) | (1,529 | ) | 4,948 | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Loss) |
74,872 | 17,863 | (2,952 | ) | (1,521 | ) | 2,556 | | 90,818 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for Loan Losses |
(2,044 | ) | (168 | ) | | | (3 | ) | (2,215 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (Loss) after Provision |
$ | 72,828 | $ | 17,695 | $ | (2,952 | ) | $ | (1,521 | ) | $ | 2,553 | $ | | $ | 88,603 | ||||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest Income-External
Customers |
$ | 42,999 | $ | 1,544 | $ | 12,660 | $ | (2,585 | ) | $ | 11 | $ | 54,629 | |||||||||||||||||||
Intersegment Noninterest Income |
2,949 | 81 | | | 1,040 | (4,070 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Income |
$ | 45,948 | $ | 1,625 | $ | 12,660 | $ | (2,585 | ) | $ | 1,051 | $ | (4,070 | ) | $ | 54,629 | ||||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST EXPENSE |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Depreciation and Amortization |
$ | 2,066 | $ | 91 | $ | 5 | $ | 8 | $ | 4,699 | $ | 6,869 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Direct Expense |
53,507 | 7,905 | 1,969 | 440 | 48,167 | (4,070 | ) | 107,918 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overhead and Support |
40,756 | 5,002 | 1,516 | 201 | (47,475 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Noninterest Expense |
$ | 96,329 | $ | 12,998 | $ | 3,490 | $ | 649 | $ | 5,391 | $ | (4,070 | ) | $ | 114,787 | |||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Taxes and
Minority Interest |
$ | 22,447 | $ | 6,322 | $ | 6,218 | $ | (4,755 | ) | $ | (1,787 | ) | $ | | $ | 28,445 | ||||||||||||||||
Taxes |
$ | 6,266 | $ | 971 | $ | 2,268 | $ | | $ | (255 | ) | $ | | $ | 9,250 | |||||||||||||||||
Minority Interest |
| | | (21 | ) | 7,096 | 7,075 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations |
$ | 16,181 | $ | 5,351 | $ | 3,950 | $ | (4,734 | ) | $ | (8,628 | ) | $ | | $ | 12,120 | ||||||||||||||||
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net of taxes |
| (4,422 | ) | | | | | (4,422 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) |
$ | 16,181 | $ | 929 | $ | 3,950 | $ | (4,734 | ) | $ | (8,628 | ) | $ | | $ | 7,698 | ||||||||||||||||
Total Average Assets |
$ | 3,490,650 | $ | 653,055 | $ | 3,207,271 | $ | 60,222 | $ | 795,044 | $ | (1,575,542 | ) | $ | 6,630,700 | |||||||||||||||||
NOTE 7:
|
ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVES |
See Note 1 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of the Companys accounting policies related to derivatives.
The Company utilizes the following types of hedging instruments:
Fair Value Hedges The Company enters into pay fixed, receive floating interest rate swaps to hedge changes in fair value of fixed rate loans attributable to changes in benchmark interest rates. At June 30, 2004 and 2003, Riggs had no fair value hedges.
Cash Flow Hedges Riggs uses interest rate swaps to hedge its exposure to variability in expected future cash outflows on floating rate liabilities attributable to changes in interest rates. At June 30, 2004, Riggs had six such interest rate swaps with a total notional value of $45.7 million compared to seven swaps with a total notional of $46.6 million at June 30, 2003. The Company also uses foreign currency forward contracts to hedge the foreign exchange risk associated with principal and interest payments on loans denominated in a foreign currency. At June 30, 2004, there were no foreign currency forward contracts compared to one such contract with a total notional value of $517 million at June 30, 2003.
Gains or losses on derivatives that are reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to income are included in the line in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in which the income or expense related to the hedged item is recorded. At June 30, 2004, there were no deferred net losses on derivative instruments in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income to be reclassified as expense during the next twelve months compared to $6 thousand of deferred net losses at June 30, 2003. The maximum term over which Riggs was hedging its exposure to the variability of cash flows was forty-six months as of June 30, 2004 and fifty-eight months as of June 30, 2003.
19
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
The Company uses forward exchange contracts to hedge substantially all of its net investment in a foreign subsidiary. The purpose of this hedge is to protect against adverse movements in currency exchange rates, in this case for British pounds sterling. At June 30, 2004, $174 thousand of net gains related to the existing net investment forward exchange contract are included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income compared to $575 thousand of net gains at June 30, 2003. The corresponding notional values for these periods was $76.4 million and $76.8 million, respectively.
The impact on the Consolidated Statements of Operations from these swaps was a gain of $165 thousand for the first six months of 2004 and a gain of $172 thousand for the same period in 2003. Of these gains, $155 thousand and $256 thousand are recorded in Income from Discontinued Operations at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
In addition, the Company has certain derivative instruments used to manage interest rate risk that are not designated to specific hedge relationships. These instruments are marked to market through current period earnings. At June 30, 2004 Riggs had three such interest rate contracts and four such forward contracts with a total notional value of $24.7 million compared to twenty interest rate contracts and two forward contracts with a total notional value of $81.1 million at June 30, 2003. The carrying value of these items is a net liability held for sale of $57 thousand and $434 thousand at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
NOTE
8: CONSENT ORDER, CIVIL MONEY PENALTY AND OTHER MATTERS |
In July 2003, Riggs Bank N.A. (the Bank) entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order and a Consent Order (the July 2003 Consent Order) with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the OCC). The provisions of the July 2003 Consent Order are effective until such time as they are amended, suspended, waived or terminated by the OCC. The Consent Order requires the Bank to take various actions to ensure compliance and improve the monitoring of compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and related rules and regulations (BSA).
In May 2004, the Bank entered into an additional Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order and a Consent Order (the May 2004 Consent Order) with the OCC which supplements, but does not replace, the July 2003 Consent Order. At the same time, the Bank entered into a Consent to the Assessment of Civil Money Penalty with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These consents were entered into as a result of the banking regulators allegations that the Bank (1) violated the BSA and related rules and regulations, (2) failed to comply with the July 2003 Consent Order and (3) failed to implement adequate controls to ensure that the Bank operates in a safe and sound manner with respect to BSA compliance. The May 2004 Consent Order requires the Bank to take various actions as more fully described in the next paragraph, with respect to BSA compliance. Concurrently with the May 2004 Consent Order, the Bank was assessed and paid a civil money penalty of $25 million.
Among the more significant OCC-required actions the Bank is required to take under the May 2004 Consent Order are (1) a review and evaluation of the adequacy of the Banks staffing skills and levels with regard to meeting its obligations under the consent order, (2) an evaluation of the Banks books, records and information systems relative to the BSA and related rules and regulations and development of a plan to correct any noted deficiencies, (3) adoption, implementation and adherence to written policies for internal controls applicable to account relationships and related staffing, (4) the adoption of a Bank dividend policy which requires regulatory approval prior to the declaration of a dividend and (5) adoption, implementation and adherence to an internal audit program that, among other things, is adequate to detect irregularities in the Banks operations, determine the Banks compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and evaluates adherence to established policies and procedures. The May 2004 Consent Order also requires that the Bank review previously filed Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) and Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs) to ascertain that those reports were accurately filed and to review the activity from January 1, 2001 in all accounts identified as high risk to ensure that SARs and CTRs have been filed as appropriate.
20
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
Also in May 2004, the Company and Riggs International Banking Corporation (RIBC), the Companys Miami Edge Act subsidiary, entered into a Cease and Desist Order with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve) which generally requires that (1) the Company hire an independent consultant to review the functions and performance of the Board of Directors and senior management, (2) the Companys Board of Directors submit a plan to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond to strengthen board oversight of the management and operations of the Company and its subsidiaries, (3) the Company submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond a plan to improve the risk management practices of the Company and its subsidiaries, and (4) the Company submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond an internal audit program. The Cease and Desist Order also generally requires that (1) RIBC submit a plan to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta to ensure compliance with all applicable provisions of the BSA and related rules and regulations, (2) RIBC submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta a customer due diligence program (3) RIBC engage the services of a qualified independent firm to conduct a review of account and transaction activity to determine whether suspicious activities in accounts, if any, were properly identified and reported, and (4) RIBC submit a plan to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta to ensure compliance with regulations of the U.S. Department of the Treasurys Office of Foreign Assets Control. Once such plans are approved by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, as the case may be, the Cease and Desist Order requires that the Company and RIBC, as the case may be, adopt and comply with such plans. The Cease and Desist Order does not impose a monetary penalty, but does require, however, that the Company obtain prior approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Director of the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation of the Federal Reserve prior to declaring or paying dividends, paying interest on its trust preferred securities or acquiring its own stock. The operations of RIBC are currently being wound down.
The July 2003 Consent Order, the May 2004 Consent Orders and the Cease and Desist Order allow the regulators to take whatever future actions deemed necessary to fulfill their regulatory obligations and remain in effect until waived or terminated by the regulators.
Primarily as a direct result of the above noted BSA criticisms, each of the Bank and the Company has been designated as being in a troubled condition by the OCC and the Federal Reserve, respectively. A bank or bank holding company that is classified as being in a troubled condition must have any new director or executive officer approved in advance by the OCC or Federal Reserve, as the case may be, and is subject to restrictions on making severance payments to its directors, officers and employees under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations (FDIC) golden parachute regulations. In addition, entities that are in a troubled condition are subject to increased regulatory supervision. The increased regulatory supervision has resulted and is expected to continue to result in more frequent and intensive examinations.
The Companys BSA-related regulatory problems have significantly increased its costs of doing business and the company expects to continue to incur significant expenses in connection therewith. During the first half of 2004, Riggs had approximately $7.9 million of consulting and legal costs attributable to these matters. Because it has been designated as being in a troubled condition, the Banks FDIC quarterly insurance assessment increased by approximately $250 thousand from the first to the second quarter of 2004.
The July 2003 Consent Order is included in a Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 17, 2003 and the May 2004 Consent Order and the Cease and Desist Order are included in a Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 17, 2004.
As noted in Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, the Bank serves as trustee for the MEPT. The governing document provides for amendment of the trust. Such amendment may include the naming of a new trustee and subsequent transitioning of the trustee from Riggs to another entity. Riggs continues to negotiate with other participants in the trust regarding the transitioning to another trustee and the amount and timing of the consideration to be received by the Company.
NOTE 9:
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Prior to and during the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company entered into various transactions with officers and directors of the Company and its affiliates as well as with their associates. These transactions were of a similar nature to those described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. At June 30, 2004, the Company had $206.2 million of debt payable to Riggs Capital II, an unconsolidated subsidiary.
21
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
NOTE 10:
|
NEW FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS |
In March 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 105 (SAB 105), Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments. SAB No. 105 provides guidance regarding loan commitments accounted for as derivative instruments, and is effective for quarters beginning April 1, 2004. The Company is currently retaining substantially all of the loans it originates and therefore SAB No. 105 does not have a material impact.
NOTE 11:
|
LITIGATION |
In the normal course of business there are other lawsuits pending against Riggs National Corporation and its subsidiaries. The Company intends to aggressively defend itself against such suits.
On April 7, 2004 and April 28, 2004, Company shareholders filed substantially similar purported derivative actions in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County against the Companys Board of Directors. On April 17, 2004, Company shareholders filed a purported derivative action in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia against the Companys Board of Directors, substantially similar to the actions filed by Company shareholders in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County. The complaints each allege that the Company violated its fiduciary duties in relation to a variety of matters, including, among others, the compliance by the Company with various anti-money laundering laws and various aspects of the Banks international and embassy businesses. The lawsuits each seek, on behalf of the Company, among other things, monetary damages and certain types of equitable relief.
The Company is subject to numerous investigations by, and inquiries from, various U.S. and foreign government agencies and authorities. Some of the investigations and inquiries involve current or former employees of the Company. These investigations and inquiries include, among other things, accounts maintained by Equatorial Guinea, Saudi Arabia and Augusto Pinochet and the Companys anti-money laundering and BSA compliance. In connection with investigations regarding the Companys Chief Risk Officer resulting from his formerly being the OCC examiner in charge of the Bank, the Company has placed such officer on leave. The Company is currently in the process of attempting to review these matters. It is not possible for the Company to predict the impact or effect of these investigations, inquiries and matters.
Certain Riggs Bank directors or executive officers have been added as defendants to a criminal Spanish court action involving the accounts of Augusto Pinochet.
NOTE 12:
|
NET PERIODIC PENSION COST |
The Companys net periodic costs for the pension plan and postretirement health and life insurance benefits are as follows:
Components of Net Period Benefit Cost
(IN THOUSANDS)
RIGGS NATIONAL CORPORATION | ||||||||||||||||
Six months ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
Other Post | ||||||||||||||||
Pension |
Retirement Benefits |
|||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 119 | $ | 120 | $ | 245 | $ | 259 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
3,181 | 3,160 | 855 | 832 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(4,043 | ) | (3,935 | ) | | | ||||||||||
Amortization of transition amount |
| | 178 | 178 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
(57 | ) | (60 | ) | (1,535 | ) | (1,535 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of the net (gain) loss |
2,545 | 2,660 | 1,653 | 1,662 | ||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 1,745 | $ | 1,945 | $ | 1,396 | $ | 1,396 | ||||||||
The Company did not make any contributions to the pension plan during the six month periods ending June 30, 2004 and 2003. The Company has not yet determined whether it will make a contribution to the pension plan in 2004.
NOTE 13:
|
PENDING MERGER |
On July 16, 2004, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) and Riggs National Corporation entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) under which PNC agreed to acquire the Company.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Riggs National Corporation will merge into PNC and Riggs Bank will merge into PNC Bank, National Association. Riggs shareholders will be entitled to receive the merger consideration in shares of PNCs common stock or in cash, subject to proration. The aggregate consideration, based upon the number of shares outstanding at the time the Merger Agreement was signed is composed of 7,533,648 shares of PNCs common stock and $321 million in cash, subject to adjustment. The actual value of the merger consideration to be paid upon closing will depend on the average stock price of PNCs common stock for the five trading days
22
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONTINUED
prior to the merger and the cash and stock components on a per Riggs share basis will be determined at that time based on the average PNC common stock price so that each share of Riggs receives consideration representing equal value based on that average price. Riggs options outstanding as of the merger will be cashed out. Total consideration paid by PNC is expected to be approximately $774 million based upon PNCs stock value and the number of Riggs shares outstanding at the time of the merger announcement.
In connection with the merger, Riggs has agreed to coordinate its dividend record and payment dates with those of PNC by using the same record and payment dates used by PNC for payments of cash dividends on PNC common stock. Accordingly, Riggs expects to pay its next quarterly dividend in October 2004, subject to prior regulatory approval.
PNC has indicated to Riggs that it anticipates that the merger will be completed in the first quarter of 2005.
NOTE 14:
|
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
Subsequent to June 30, 2004, Riggs entered into an agreement to sell a bank property in London and agreed to a Letter of Intent to sell the corporate aircraft formerly used in support of its international operations. The anticipated capital gain on the bank property in London is approximately $2.5 million. Net proceeds from the sale of the corporate aircraft approximate its carrying value and the transaction is expected to be completed within the next 30 days.
The Company retained the firm of Crowe Chizek (Crowe) to manage Project EPS, a two year long project to modernize the Companys technology platform and re-design various operational processes. Under the terms of the Master Professional Services Agreement (MPSA) with Crowe, Crowe was to be compensated in part based upon the monetary benefit derived by the Company as a result of specific projects and initiatives managed by them. On several of these projects and initiatives, Riggs and Crowe do not agree as to the amount of benefits that Riggs has derived and, in July 2004, the Company and Crowe mutually agreed to attempt to resolve the matter through the mediation process set forth in the MPSA. Crowe has also alleged material default by the Company of a number of requirements of the MPSA. The Company is analyzing the Crowe default claims.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements (as such term is defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that reflect the Companys current expectations and projections about future results, performance, prospects and opportunities, and include, without limitation, the references in this 10-Q to earnings from venture capital, implementation of business strategies, hedging activities and the Companys trust and investment advisory income. The Company has attempted to identify these forward-looking statements by using words such as may, will, expect, anticipate, believe, intend, estimate, could or similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are based on information currently available and are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities in 2004 and beyond to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. These risks include, but are not limited to, certain risks and uncertainties that may affect the operations, performance, development, growth projections and results of the business. More specifically, these risks include the growth of (or decline in) the economy, changes in credit quality or interest rates, changes in value of venture capital investments in the technology and other sectors, timing of technology enhancements for products and operating systems, the impact of competitive products, services and pricing, customer business requirements, Congressional legislation, regulatory oversight, investigations, the ability to successfully wind down and/or sell its international business operations, general economic conditions-both domestic and international-and similar matters. In addition, the continuing impact of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks on the U.S. and global economy, the possibility of additional attacks, and international political conditions also may be an important factor or make the occurrence of one or more of the aforementioned risks or factors more likely.
Do not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
23
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
OVERVIEW
The following discussion and analysis should be read along with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. As noted above, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause the Companys actual results, performance, prospects or opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements.
Riggs National Corporation is a bank holding company headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Company engages in a variety of banking and financial services including community, commercial and international banking, trust and investment management services and venture capital investing. Riggs conducts its activities through five reportable segments: Banking, International Banking, Treasury, Riggs Capital Partners (venture capital) and Other. With the exception of venture capital investing, the activities of the Company are conducted through its principal operating subsidiary, Riggs Bank, and its subsidiaries and divisions. Venture capital investing is performed through two subsidiaries of the Company, Riggs Capital Partners and Riggs Capital Partners II.
The Company has 49 branch locations and 151 ATMs in the metropolitan Washington, D.C. area and a bank in the United Kingdom. It has additional operations or subsidiaries in London (England), Miami (Florida), Jersey (Channel Islands) and Nassau (Bahamas). The Company serves an array of customers including individuals, partnerships, corporations, foundations, not-for-profit organizations and foreign embassies and delegations.
For a discussion of the more significant risk factors that impact Riggs, or could impact Riggs, see Item 7 of the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of the Companys more significant accounting policies and estimates.
EXIT FROM INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS
As noted in the Companys Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, Riggs had intentions to exit or sell most of its international banking business and focus its remaining embassy banking business on a select client base. Subsequent to June 30, 2004, the Company announced it would completely exit its foreign embassy banking relationships either through a sale or wind-down of activities. Accordingly, Riggs is pursuing a buyer for its London and Channel Islands operations, closing its Miami office and exiting its foreign embassy relationships. The Company is also selling its corporate aircraft used in support of its international operations.
The operating results of the London and Channel Islands operations, which are classified as held for sale and which include all recurring operating results as well as specific exit related expenses identified in the following paragraph, are reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The operating results of the Miami business and the embassy business, which includes the expenses identified in the following paragraph, are reported in results from continuing operations. The operating results of the embassy business and Miami are included in continuing operations since they dont meet the accounting criteria for discontinued operations.
As part of the exit from its international business, Riggs accrued approximately $2.3 million of employee severance costs in the quarter ended June 30, 2004. This severance is payable under the terms of an existing Company policy and is therefore accrued in accordance with SFAS No. 112 (Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits). In addition, the Company recorded approximately $500 thousand of employee retention costs which are accrued in accordance with SFAS No. 146 (Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities). The Company anticipates recording approximately $900 thousand of additional retention expense in the second half of 2004. The Company also recorded approximately $300 thousand of additional exit-related expenses in the quarter ended June 30, 2004, most of which pertain to accruals for leasehold obligations at vacated properties and writes-downs associated with abandoned fixed assets.
Approximately $800 thousand of the above expenses are included in results from continuing operations, impacting the Banking Segment, and approximately $2.3 million is included in the results of discontinued operations, impacting the International Banking Segment.
24
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
The Company recorded an impairment charge on its corporate aircraft that is held for sale of $7.1 million during the second quarter of 2004. The amount of this charge was based upon an offer to purchase reduced by estimated selling costs. Consistent with its policy of allocating the operating costs of the aircraft, 45% of the impairment charge was allocated to the International Banking Segment, 25% of the impairment charge was allocated across all segments as part of general corporate overhead and 30% was charged to the Other Segment.
The assets and liabilities that are held for sale at June 30, 2004, which are valued in the aggregate at the lower of cost or estimated market value include:
Assets: |
||||
Cash |
$ | 7,037 | ||
Time Deposits with Other Banks |
130,753 | |||
Loans |
152,558 | |||
Bank Premises and Equipment |
39,124 | |||
Other Assets |
3,486 | |||
Total |
$ | 332,958 | ||
Liabilities: |
||||
Noninterest-Bearing Demand Deposits |
$ | 21,128 | ||
Interest-Bearing Deposits |
139,929 | |||
Other Liabilities |
5,685 | |||
Total |
$ | 166,742 | ||
As noted above, the Company is attempting to sell its London and Channel Islands operations. If a buyer cannot be found, Riggs will wind down these operations. A wind down would result in increased costs primarily related to the London pension plan and lease breakage fees. The Company estimates that these increased costs are approximately $8.0 to $11.0 million.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The Company recorded a loss from continuing operations of $31.3 million, or $(1.07) per share, and a net loss of $34.4 million, or $(1.18) per share, in the second quarter of 2004 compared to income from continuing operations of $6.3 million, or $0.22 per diluted share, and net income of $1.8 million, or $0.06 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2003. The second quarter 2004 and 2003 results, which were, respectively, a net loss and net income, include the results of both continuing and discontinued operations. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company reported a loss from continuing operations of $26.9 million, or $(0.93) per share, and a net loss of $30.5 million, or $(1.05) per share. During the comparable period of 2003, Riggs recorded income from continuing operations of $12.1 million and net income of $7.7 million, or $0.42 and $0.27 per diluted share, respectively. The net loss for the six months of 2004 and the net income for the six months of 2003 include the results of both continuing and discontinued operations. The decrease in earnings in the second quarter of 2004 was due primarily to the previously disclosed $25.0 million civil money penalty assessed by banking regulators for alleged violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). No tax benefit has been realized as a result of this penalty. In addition, in the second quarter of 2004 the Company incurred approximately $7.2 million of consulting, legal and other costs directly related to its BSA compliance efforts. Also in the second quarter of 2004, the Company recorded $10.2 million of expense related to the implementation of its exit from the international banking business. Of the $10.2 million, approximately $2.3 million is included in loss from discontinued operations and represents primarily employee severance arrangements. The remaining amount, which is included in loss from continuing operations, includes a $7.1 million impairment charge taken on the corporate aircraft. The remaining expense included in the results of continuing operations is primarily attributable to employee retention programs. The Company is attempting to sell its London and Channel Islands operations. If a satisfactory buyer for these operations cannot be located, the Company will wind down these operations which, as noted above, could result in additional costs of approximately $8.0 to $11.0 million.
Return on average assets was (2.10)% and (.96)% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to .11% and .23% for the same periods a year ago. Return on average shareholders equity was (38.68)% and (16.63)% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to 1.81% and 3.95% for the same periods of 2003.
25
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
NET INTEREST INCOME
Net interest income on a tax-equivalent basis (net interest income plus an amount equal to the tax savings on tax-exempt interest) totaled $40.4 million in the second quarter of 2004, a $5.0 million (or 11%) decrease from the $45.4 million for the same quarter in 2003. This decrease was attributable to both a decrease in the tax-equivalent rate earned on interest-earning assets and an increase in the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Interest income on a tax equivalent basis declined $2.4 million, or 4%, in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003. This decline in interest income is primarily attributable to decreases in rates on loans and securities available for sale, which decreased 40 and 24 basis points, respectively, as well as changes in the mix of average earning assets.
Average interest-bearing liabilities declined from the second quarter of 2003 to the comparable period of 2004, while rates on these liabilities increased from 1.18% to 1.52% in the same time period. The net decline in balances was entirely in interest-bearing deposits, which decreased by $1.10 billion, primarily as a result of a mid-2003 methodology change in the way the U.S. Treasury compensates financial agent banks as discussed below. Rates on interest-bearing deposits declined by 20 basis points year-to-year. The decline in interest bearing deposits was partially offset by increases in FHLB borrowings and long-term debt. Averages balances in that category increased $461.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the same period a year ago. The rate on FHLB borrowings and long term debt increased from 2.93% to 4.30% in the same period, due to new advances in the second quarter of 2004 for which the Company is paying higher rates, the reclassification of debt payable to the trusts which issued trust preferred securities as discussed below, variable advances outstanding that converted into higher fixed term rates, and the overall higher rate environment compared to the prior year.
For the six months ended June 30, 2004, net interest income was $80.8 million, a $12.4 million decrease from the $93.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003. As occurred in the three month period-to-period comparison, the decline was primarily due to declines in rates on loans and investment securities available for sale, and the increase in volume and rates on FHLB borrowings and other long-term debt. These factors simultaneously decreased interest income and increased interest expense.
Net interest income in 2004 compared to 2003 was adversely impacted by a mid-year change in 2003 in the methodology by which the U.S. Treasury compensates financial agent banks, such as Riggs. Prior to July 14, 2003, and therefore including the first and second quarters of 2003, Riggs as a financial agent bank was compensated by net interest earned on interest-bearing U.S. Treasury deposits. These deposits required collateral in the form of available for sale securities to be pledged against the deposits. Hence, for the first and second quarters of 2003, the methodology by which the U.S. Treasury compensated financial agent banks affected the average balance of interest-earning assets, interest-bearing liabilities and, as a result, net interest income. Beginning July 14, 2003, Riggs utilized non-interest bearing U.S. Treasury deposits to purchase a non-marketable, U.S. Treasury-issued depositary compensation security (DCS) for the same amount as the U.S. Treasury deposits. The DCS and deposit balances were netted in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition in accordance with FIN 39 (Offsetting of Amount Related to Certain Contracts) and, therefore, not included in either average interest-earnings assets or average interest-bearing liabilities during the first quarter of 2004. Effective March 2004, the U.S. Treasury neither maintains funds at Riggs to compensate it as a financial agent bank nor does Riggs hold a U.S. Treasury DCS. Rather, commencing in March 2004, Riggs invoices the U.S. Treasury on a monthly basis for services performed as a financial agent bank. Income earned by Riggs in its capacity as a financial agent bank in the second quarter of and year-to-date 2004 was $2.0 million and $4.4 million, respectively, and is reflected as a component of noninterest income. The average balance of deposits maintained by the U.S. Treasury to compensate Riggs as a financial agent bank during the second quarter and first six months of 2003 was approximately $520.3 million and $825.2 million, respectively.
During the second quarter and first six months of 2003, guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures were reported, net of the amount of these securities which had been repurchased by the Company, as minority interest. Accordingly, the expense of these debentures was included in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the periods ended June 30, 2003 as minority interest in income of subsidiaries, net of taxes. During the first half of 2003, therefore, these debentures had no impact on the reported net interest income of the Company. On October 1, 2003, however, the Company adopted FIN 46 (Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities) and therefore ceased consolidating Riggs Capital and Riggs Capital II, the business trusts which had issued its Series A and Series C debentures.
Riggs Capital II, the issuer of $200 million of 8.875% Series C debentures, remains an unconsolidated entity at June 30, 2004 and, accordingly, the $206.2 million of Riggs National Corporation (Parent Company) debt payable to Riggs Capital II is a liability of the Company at this date. Interest on this debt for the second quarter and first six months of 2004 in the amount of $4.6 million and $9.1 million, respectively, is included in long-term interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. At June 30, 2004, the Company owned $49.9 million of the Series C debentures which are classified as securities held to maturity on the Consolidated Statements of Condition. The average of Series C debentures owned by the Company during the second quarter and first half of 2004 was $49.9 million and $24.4 million, respectively, and the income earned on these securities was $1.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively. Therefore the deconsolidation of Riggs Capital II had a $3.5 million and $6.9 million adverse impact on net interest income in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 when compared to the three and six month periods of 2003.
26
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
Riggs Capital, the issuer of $150 million of 8.625% Series A debentures, was also deconsolidated upon the adoption of FIN 46 in 2003. In February 2004, however, the Company, which had also been acquiring these securities, acquired sufficient Series A debentures so that it owned more than 50% of all such debentures and, accordingly, reconsolidated this entity as the Company is the primary beneficiary of Riggs Capital. As a result, the debt payable by Riggs National Corporation (Parent Company) to Riggs Capital at June 30, 2004 and the related interest expense since reconsolidation have been eliminated in consolidation. Interest expense on this debt which was incurred prior to reconsolidation amounted to $1.1 million and is included in interest expense on long-term debt in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six months ended June 30, 2004. Prior to reconsolidation, the Series A debentures owned by the Company were classified as held to maturity securities in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. These securities had an average balance of $29.9 million for the first quarter of 2004 and $14.9 million for the first six months of 2004 and $0.5 million of interest income on these securities is included in interest income for the six months prior to reconsolidation. Therefore the deconsolidation of Riggs Capital had a $0.6 million adverse impact on net interest income in the first half of 2004 compared to the comparable period of the prior year.
At June 30, 2004, the Series A debentures outstanding are netted against the Series A debentures owned by the Company and reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Condition as guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures. The expense related to these debentures is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as minority interest expense, net of taxes.
An analysis of the changes in interest income and expense attributable to volume and rate changes follows:
NET INTEREST INCOME CHANGES (1)
THREE MONTHS ENDED | SIX MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2004 VS. 2003 |
JUNE 30, 2004 VS. 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(TAX-EQUIVALENT BASIS) | DUE TO | DUE TO | TOTAL | DUE TO | DUE TO | TOTAL | ||||||||||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS) | RATE | VOLUME | CHANGE | RATE | VOLUME | CHANGE | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans, Including Fees |
$ | (3,105 | ) | $ | 2,135 | $ | (970 | ) | $ | (7,879 | ) | $ | 4,711 | $ | (3,168 | ) | ||||||||
Securities Available for Sale |
(1,351 | ) | (622 | ) | (1,973 | ) | (1,698 | ) | (2,635 | ) | (4,333 | ) | ||||||||||||
Securities Held to Maturity |
| 1,096 | 1,096 | | 2,646 | 2,646 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time Deposits with Other Banks |
95 | (149 | ) | (54 | ) | (93 | ) | (109 | ) | (202 | ) | |||||||||||||
Federal Funds Sold and Reverse Repurchase Agreements |
(166 | ) | (306 | ) | (472 | ) | (522 | ) | (1,902 | ) | (2,424 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total Interest Income |
(4,527 | ) | 2,154 | (2,373 | ) | (10,192 | ) | 2,711 | (7,481 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Interest Expense: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-Bearing Deposits |
(1,787 | ) | (2,114 | ) | (3,901 | ) | (4,500 | ) | (4,135 | ) | (8,635 | ) | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements and Other Short-Term Borrowings |
(989 | ) | 922 | (67 | ) | (583 | ) | 1,507 | 924 | |||||||||||||||
FHLB Borrowings and Other Long-Term Debt |
2,158 | 4,414 | 6,572 | 3,119 | 9,545 | 12,664 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Interest Expense |
(618 | ) | 3,222 | 2,604 | (1,964 | ) | 6,917 | 4,953 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income |
$ | (3,909 | ) | $ | (1,068 | ) | $ | (4,977 | ) | $ | (8,228 | ) | $ | (4,206 | ) | $ | (12,434 | ) |
(1) - | The dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense attributable to changes in rate/volume (change in rate multiplied by change in volume) has been allocated between rate and volume variances based on the percentage relationship of such variances to each other. Income and rates are computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a Federal income tax rate of 35% and local tax rates as applicable. |
27
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
An analysis of the changes in the Companys Average Statements of Condition and changes to its margin for the quarters ended June 30 follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED | THREE MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2004 |
JUNE 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(TAX-EQUIVALENT BASIS) (1) | AVERAGE | INCOME/ | AVERAGE | INCOME/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS) | BALANCE | EXPENSE | RATE | BALANCE | EXPENSE | RATE | ||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2) |
$ | 3,106,269 | $ | 39,278 | 5.09 | % | $ | 2,939,424 | $ | 40,248 | 5.49 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities Held to Maturity |
49,775 | 1,096 | 8.86 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale (3) |
2,136,647 | 16,507 | 3.11 | 2,209,490 | 18,480 | 3.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time Deposits with Other Banks |
31,472 | 166 | 2.12 | 66,812 | 220 | 1.32 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal Funds Sold and Reverse Repurchase Agreements |
256,726 | 648 | 1.02 | 367,802 | 1,120 | 1.22 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Earning Assets and Average Rate Earned (5) |
5,580,889 | 57,695 | 4.16 | 5,583,528 | 60,068 | 4.32 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reserve for Loan Losses |
(26,065 | ) | (23,259 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and Due from Banks |
195,766 | 172,197 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets Held for Sale |
369,743 | 335,285 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets |
461,989 | 419,341 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 6,582,322 | $ | 6,487,092 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-Bearing Deposits |
$ | 2,940,871 | $ | 4,877 | 0.67 | % | $ | 4,038,611 | $ | 8,778 | 0.87 | % | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements and Other Short-Term Borrowings |
694,580 | 2,281 | 1.32 | 463,029 | 2,348 | 2.03 | ||||||||||||||||||
FHLB Borrowings and Other Long-Term Debt |
944,188 | 10,097 | 4.30 | 482,503 | 3,525 | 2.93 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Interest-Bearing Funds and Average Rate Paid |
4,579,639 | 17,255 | 1.52 | 4,984,143 | 14,651 | 1.18 | ||||||||||||||||||
Demand Deposits (4) |
1,257,677 | 536,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities Held for Sale |
209,152 | 196,207 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Liabilities |
105,740 | 128,418 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures |
72,634 | 248,584 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders Equity |
357,480 | 392,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities, Minority Interest and Shareholders Equity |
$ | 6,582,322 | $ | 6,487,092 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME AND SPREAD |
$ | 40,440 | 2.64 | % | $ | 45,417 | 3.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST MARGIN ON EARNING ASSETS |
2.91 | % | 3.26 | % |
(1) - | Income and rates are computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a Federal income tax rate of 35% and local tax rates as applicable. | |
(2) - | Loans held for sale and nonperforming loans are included in average balances used to determine rates. | |
(3) - | The averages and rates for the securities available for sale portfolio are based on amortized cost. | |
(4) - | Demand deposit balances for all periods presented exclude certain accounts transferred to the money market classification to reduce the level of deposit reserves required. | |
(5) - | Includes loans held for sale but excludes venture capital investments. |
28
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
An analysis of the changes in the Companys Average Statements of Condition and changes to its margin for the six months ended June 30 follows:
SIX MONTHS ENDED | SIX MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, 2004 |
JUNE 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
(TAX-EQUIVALENT BASIS) (1) | AVERAGE | INCOME/ | AVERAGE | INCOME/ | ||||||||||||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS) | BALANCE | EXPENSE | RATE | BALANCE | EXPENSE | RATE | ||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2) |
$ | 3,105,141 | $ | 78,842 | 5.11 | % | $ | 2,933,878 | $ | 82,010 | 5.64 | % | ||||||||||||
Securities Held to Maturity |
63,719 | 2,646 | 8.35 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Securities Available for Sale (3) |
2,057,608 | 33,118 | 3.24 | 2,219,750 | 37,451 | 3.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Time Deposits with Other Banks |
42,145 | 181 | .86 | 64,083 | 383 | 1.21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal Funds Sold and Reverse Repurchase Agreements |
174,863 | 880 | 1.01 | 537,956 | 3,304 | 1.24 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Earning Assets and Average Rate Earned (5) |
5,443,476 | 115,667 | 4.27 | 5,755,667 | 123,148 | 4.31 | ||||||||||||||||||
Reserve for Loan Losses |
(26,331 | ) | (22,955 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and Due from Banks |
183,206 | 167,792 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Assets Held for Sale |
371,805 | 316,121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets |
439,796 | 414,075 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets |
$ | 6,411,952 | $ | 6,630,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES, MINORITY INTEREST AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-Bearing Deposits |
$ | 3,168,156 | $ | 10,262 | 0.65 | % | $ | 4,253,557 | $ | 18,897 | 0.90 | % | ||||||||||||
Repurchase Agreements and Other Short-Term Borrowings |
673,559 | 4,509 | 1.35 | 456,468 | 3,585 | 1.58 | ||||||||||||||||||
FHLB Borrowings and Other Long-Term Debt |
888,545 | 20,102 | 4.55 | 439,243 | 7,438 | 3.41 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Interest-Bearing Funds and Average Rate Paid |
4,730,260 | 34,873 | 1.48 | 5,149,268 | 29,920 | 1.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
Demand Deposits (4) |
936,248 | 538,323 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Liabilities Held for Sale |
222,145 | 178,027 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Liabilities |
99,092 | 123,889 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Guaranteed Preferred Beneficial Interests in Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures |
55,919 | 248,584 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders Equity |
368,288 | 392,609 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities, Minority Interest and Shareholders Equity |
$ | 6,411,952 | $ | 6,630,700 | ||||||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME AND SPREAD |
$ | 80,794 | 2.79 | % | $ | 93,228 | 3.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST MARGIN ON EARNING ASSETS |
2.98 | % | 3.27 | % |
(1) - | Income and rates are computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a Federal income tax rate of 35% and local tax rates as applicable. | |
(2) - | Loans held for sale and nonperforming loans are included in average balances used to determine rates. | |
(3) - | The averages and rates for the securities available for sale portfolio are based on amortized cost. | |
(4) - | Demand deposit balances for all periods presented exclude certain accounts transferred to the money market classification to reduce the level of deposit reserves required. | |
(5) - | Includes loans held for sale but excludes venture capital investments. |
29
ITEM
2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
The composition of average earning assets and average interest-bearing liabilities is as follows:
THREE MONTHS ENDED | SIX MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, |
JUNE 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2004 | 2003 | |||||||||||||
Total Loans |
55 | % | 52 | % | 57 | % | 51 | % | ||||||||
Securities Available for Sale |
38 | 40 | 38 | 39 | ||||||||||||
Securities Held to Maturity |
1 | | 1 | | ||||||||||||
Time Deposits with Other Banks |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Federal Funds Sold & Reverse Repurchase Agreements |
5 | 7 | 3 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Total Average Earning Assets |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
Interest-Bearing Deposits |
64 | % | 81 | % | 67 | % | 83 | % | ||||||||
Repurchase Agreements & Other Short-Term Borrowings |
15 | 9 | 14 | 9 | ||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt |
21 | 10 | 19 | 8 | ||||||||||||
Total Average Interest Bearing Liabilities |
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME
Noninterest income for the second quarter of 2004 totaled $25.7 million, a decrease of 12% from the $29.2 million in the second quarter of 2003. This decrease resulted primarily from a $6.5 million reduction in securities gains, partially offset by an increase in venture capital gains from the comparable quarter of the prior year of $2.4 million and an increase in service charges of $900 thousand. Significant securities gains had been recorded in the second quarter of 2003 as the Company sold high-coupon mortgage-backed securities that were prepaying rapidly. The increase in service charges and fees from the prior year was partly due to the previously described change in how the U.S. Treasury compensates financial agent banks such as Riggs. The earnings on the DCS for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 were $2.0 million. There was no comparable DCS income in the second quarter of 2003. Deposit service charges and overdraft fees declined by $603 thousand primarily due to a reduction in the number of low balance accounts as a result of the implementation of higher fees.
Noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2004 totaled $50.2 million, a decrease of $4.4 million from the $54.6 million recorded for the comparable period at June 30, 2003. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in securities gains from the prior year of $10.9 million, resulting from the aforementioned sale of mortgage-backed securities. These decreases in securities gains were partially offset by an increase in venture capital gains and increases in service charges and fees of $1.7 million. Offsetting the increases were decreases in deposit account and overdraft fees of $1.4 million due to a smaller number of low balance accounts as the result of the implementation of higher fees.
Trust and investment advisory income, which did not change significantly year to year, impacts the Riggs & Company segment while venture capital losses impact the Riggs Capital Partners segment. Securities gains impact the Treasury segment and service charge income primarily impacts the Banking segment.
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Noninterest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2004 was $100.6 million, an increase of $42.1 million from the $58.5 million reported for the three months ended June 30, 2003. The 72% increase in noninterest expense from the second quarter of 2003 is comprised of the following:
Salaries and Employee Benefits |
$ | 3.6 | million | |||||
Occupancy, Net |
0.6 | |||||||
Data Processing Services |
(3.2 | ) | ||||||
Furniture, Equipment and Software |
3.8 | |||||||
Legal Fees |
3.0 | |||||||
Regulatory Fine |
25.0 | |||||||
Consultants |
(0.3 | ) | ||||||
Other Noninterest Expense |
9.6 | |||||||
$ | 42.1 | million | ||||||
30
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
The $3.6 million increase in salaries and employee benefits includes approximately $2.3 million in employee severance benefits related to a reduction in the Companys workforce due to the Companys decision to exit the international banking business and, in addition, approximately $500 thousand of employee retention related costs.
Net occupancy costs rose $634 thousand, or 14%, in the second quarter of 2004 compared with the second quarter of 2003 primarily due to increases in property rentals ($142 thousand) and bank premises depreciation ($133 thousand). Increases in rents, new branches, remodeling of existing branches and building improvements on other existing buildings contributed to the increase.
Data processing expense decreased by $3.2 million, or 66%, in the second quarter of 2004 compared to the second quarter of 2003 as a result of changing third party service providers. This change was implemented in the third and fourth quarters of 2003 as part of the Companys previously reported Enhancing Performance and Service project (Project EPS). Because of this change, and the different ways service providers invoice the Company for services performed, many of the costs in categories of noninterest expense other than data processing services during the quarter ended June 30, 2004 were contained in data processing services in the second quarter of 2003.
Furniture, equipment and software expense for the second quarter of 2004 increased by $3.8 million from the comparable 2003 period. The primary components of the change are increased software amortization and equipment depreciation. This increase is attributable to new equipment and related maintenance agreements procured in conjunction with Project EPS.
Consultant expense decreased $356 thousand, or 8%, from the second quarter of 2003 to the second quarter of 2004 primarily due to the completion of Project EPS in late-2003. This decrease was offset, however, by increased legal and other non interest expense related to the Companys continuing Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) compliance matters in the amount of $7.2 million. See Consent Order, Notification of Possible Assessment of Civil Money Penalties and Other Regulatory Matters. The Company anticipates that consulting and other BSA related expenses will increase in the second half of 2004 because of continuing BSA related compliance efforts.
Other noninterest expense in the second quarter of 2004 was $23.1 million, a $9.6 million increase from the second quarter of 2003. The largest component of this increase was the previously disclosed $7.1 million impairment charge on the corporate jet.
For the six months ended June 30, 2004, noninterest expense increased $42.7 million, or 37%, to $157.5 million from the prior years six month total of $114.8 million. Salaries and employee benefits increased $6.4 million, or 12%, with $2.3 million of the increase attributable to the previously mentioned employee severance benefits associated with the Companys exit from the international banking business.
Data processing services expense decreased $6.8 million, or 67% for the six months ended June 30, 2004 versus 2003, due to the change in service providers described previously for the three month variance. And, furniture and equipment expense increased $3.6 million to $10.7 million mostly due to increased software amortization and depreciation expense on equipment acquired in conjunction with Project EPS.
Other noninterest expense increased by $11.7 million, primarily due to the previously mentioned $7.1 million in impairment charges taken on the corporate jet, and increased advertising and public relations expense of $2.2 million due to a marketing campaign in the second quarter of 2004.
EFFECTIVE TAX RATES
The effective tax rate on Income (Loss) Before Taxes and Minority Interest from Continuing Operations for the six month period ended June 30, 2004 was 13% compared to 33% during the same period of the prior year.
The primary reasons for this tax rate decrease were twofold: the nondeductibility of the $25 million civil money penalty assessed and paid during the second quarter and the establishment of an additional $2.5 million valuation allowance relating to a portion of the domestic net operating loss carryforward that is subject to separate return limitation year restrictions.
31
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
FINANCIAL CONDITION
SECURITIES
Securities available for sale totaled $2.29 billion as of June 30, 2004, compared to $1.83 billion as of year-end 2003 and $2.19 billion as of June 30, 2003. The activity for the first six months of 2004 included purchases of securities available for sale totaling $18.02 billion, which were partially offset by maturities and calls, principal payments and sales of securities available for sale totaling $17.52 billion. The weighted-average duration and yield for the portfolio, adjusted for anticipated prepayments, were approximately 2.4 years and 3.03%, respectively, as of June 30, 2004. As of June 30, 2003, the weighted-average duration and yield were approximately 1.2 years and 3.24%, respectively.
Details on securities available for sale follow:
JUNE 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||
GROSS | GROSS | |||||||||||||||
AMORTIZED | UNREALIZED | UNREALIZED | FAIR | |||||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS) | COST | GAINS | LOSSES | VALUE | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Securities |
$ | 301,999 | $ | | $ | | $ | 301,999 | ||||||||
State and Municipal Securities |
26,832 | 49 | 799 | 26,082 | ||||||||||||
Government Agencies Securities |
792,778 | | 8,725 | 784,053 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities |
1,154,510 | 25 | 26,990 | 1,127,545 | ||||||||||||
Other Securities |
52,072 | 165 | | 52,237 | ||||||||||||
Total Securities Available for Sale |
$ | 2,328,191 | $ | 239 | $ | 36,514 | $ | 2,291,916 | ||||||||
DECEMBER 31, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||
GROSS | GROSS | |||||||||||||||
AMORTIZED | UNREALIZED | UNREALIZED | FAIR | |||||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS) | COST | GAINS | LOSSES | VALUE | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Securities |
$ | 25,103 | $ | | $ | 29 | $ | 25,074 | ||||||||
State and Municipal Securities |
24,917 | 145 | 44 | 25,018 | ||||||||||||
Government Agencies Securities |
720,212 | 506 | 3,191 | 717,527 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities |
1,012,635 | 1,547 | 6,933 | 1,007,249 | ||||||||||||
Other Securities |
51,831 | 119 | | 51,950 | ||||||||||||
Total Securities Available for Sale |
$ | 1,834,698 | $ | 2,317 | $ | 10,197 | $ | 1,826,818 | ||||||||
JUNE 30, 2003 |
||||||||||||||||
GROSS | GROSS | |||||||||||||||
AMORTIZED | UNREALIZED | UNREALIZED | FAIR | |||||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS) | COST | GAINS | LOSSES | VALUE | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury Securities |
$ | 30,141 | $ | 19 | $ | 4 | $ | 30,156 | ||||||||
Government Agencies Securities |
1,179,480 | 3,036 | 70 | 1,182,446 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-Backed Securities |
915,720 | 12,360 | 638 | 927,442 | ||||||||||||
Other Securities |
51,886 | 41 | | 51,927 | ||||||||||||
Total Securities Available for Sale |
$ | 2,177,227 | $ | 15,456 | $ | 712 | $ | 2,191,971 | ||||||||
32
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
Realized gains from the sale of securities totaled $231 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2004, and realized losses totaled $5 thousand. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, realized gains were $6.5 million and there were no realized losses.
Substantially all of the available for sale securities have been issued by the U.S. Treasury, an agency of the U.S. Government or a government sponsored entity (such as the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation) and, therefore, the repayment of substantially all of the available for sale securities is either guaranteed by the government or a AAA rated entity. As a result, timely payment of principal and interest is reasonably assured and any unrealized gain or loss is, therefore, attributable to changes in market interest rates.
At June 30, 2004, state and municipal securities classified as available for sale were $26.1 million, or approximately 1% of the portfolio.
LOANS
As of June 30, 2004, loans outstanding totaled $3.24 billion, with residential mortgage/home equity, commercial and financial and real estate- commercial/construction comprising 49%, 16% and 26% of the portfolio, respectively. At June 30, 2003 these percentages were 51%, 18% and 21%, respectively. The residential mortgage/home equity loans are generally fully secured with approximately 7% having a loan to value ratio of 90% or greater.
As indicated in the following table, total loans increased from $3.00 billion at June 30, 2003 to $3.24 billion at June 30, 2004. The increases were primarily in the real estate-commercial/construction and home equity loan portfolios.
As of June 30, 2004, foreign loans outstanding totaled $220.8 million, a decrease of $78.2 million from December 31, 2003 and $14.6 million from June 30, 2003. However, as of June 30, 2004, $154.1 million of these loans have been transferred to assets held for sale on the Consolidated Statement of Condition as part of the Companys previously announced plan to exit or sell its international banking businesses.
Riggs periodically purchases residential mortgage loans for asset/liability management purposes. Since June 30, 2003, the Company has purchased $94.4 million of these loans at a net premium of approximately $1.4 million. The Company does not anticipate purchasing residential mortgage loans during the remainder of 2004.
COMPOSITION OF LOAN PORTFOLIO
JUNE 30, | DECEMBER 31, | JUNE 30, | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and Financial |
$ | 524,896 | 16 | % | $ | 581,223 | 18 | % | $ | 525,467 | 18 | % | ||||||||||||
Real Estate Commercial/Construction |
835,726 | 26 | 815,004 | 25 | 628,360 | 21 | ||||||||||||||||||
Residential Mortgage |
1,225,256 | 38 | 1,155,603 | 36 | 1,266,091 | 42 | ||||||||||||||||||
Home Equity |
369,187 | 11 | 306,599 | 10 | 269,890 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||
Consumer |
64,042 | 2 | 64,403 | 2 | 63,073 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign |
220,824 | 7 | 299,055 | 9 | 235,444 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total Loans |
$ | 3,239,931 | 100 | % | $ | 3,221,887 | 100 | % | $ | 2,988,325 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||
Net Deferred Loan Fees, Premiums and Discounts |
3,648 | 3,267 | 7,088 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 3,243,579 | $ | 3,225,154 | $ | 2,995,413 | ||||||||||||||||||
Loans Transferred to Assets Held for Sale |
(154,079 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Loans |
$ | 3,089,500 | $ | 3,225,154 | $ | 2,995,413 |
33
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
RESERVE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Changes in the reserve for loan losses are summarized as follows:
SIX MONTHS ENDED | ||||||||
JUNE 30, |
||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS) | 2004 | 2003 | ||||||
Balance, January 1 |
$ | 28,285 | $ | 25,958 | ||||
Provision for loan losses |
| 2,215 | ||||||
Loans charged-off |
2,123 | 2,146 | ||||||
Less: Recoveries on charged-off loans |
1,141 | 775 | ||||||
Net loan charge-offs |
982 | 1,371 | ||||||
Transfer to
lower of cost or market valuation allowance |
(1,521 | ) | | |||||
Provisions and net charge-off activity reclassified to Discontinued Operations |
| (474 | ) | |||||
Foreign exchange translation adjustments |
19 | 57 | ||||||
Balance, June 30 |
$ | 25,801 | $ | 26,385 |
The reserve amount is determined based on the risk of loss in the loan portfolio. For the six month period ended June 30, 2004, the Company had no consolidated loan loss provision and for the six month period ended June 30, 2003, Riggs had a consolidated loan loss provision of $2.2 million. The Companys reserve for loan losses decreased by approximately $2.5 million, or 9%, from December 31, 2003 to June 30, 2004 while nonperforming assets, as noted below, decreased by approximately $1.3 million, or 53%, during the same period. $1.5 million of the decrease in the reserve balance for the first six months of 2004 consisted of the transfer to assets held for sale that portion of the reserve associated with the foreign entities now held for sale. This is in conjunction with our previously announced business strategy to reduce the Companys risk exposure in the international banking business.
Foreign loans and other credits may be adversely affected by sudden political instabilities, including military confrontations. The Company cannot estimate the losses, if any, associated with any such instability. See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Companys 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ASSET QUALITY
NONPERFORMING ASSETS
Nonperforming assets, which include nonaccrual loans, renegotiated loans, other real estate (net of reserves) and repossessed assets, totaled $1.1 million as of June 30, 2004, a $1.2 million decrease from the year-end 2003 total of $2.3 million and a $3.4 million decrease from the June 30, 2003 total of $4.5 million. Of the $1.1 million balance at June 30, 2004, $89 thousand is recorded in the Banking segment and $1.0 million is in the International Banking segment. As part of the Companys business strategy to exit international banking, the $1.0 million of International Banking nonperforming assets are classified as held for sale in the Companys Statement of Condition. The decrease in nonperforming assets from June 30, 2003 was mainly due to activity in the London based portfolio, which recorded $3.4 million in charge-offs and $1.3 million in sales and repayments in its commercial loan portfolio. These reductions were partially offset by additions to the nonperforming asset portfolio of $1.2 million. There were no renegotiated loans at June 30, 2004 and 2003, and December 31, 2003. As of June 30, 2004 the Company had no specific reserves for loan losses.
PAST-DUE AND POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS
Past-due loans consist of residential real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans and consumer loans that are in the process of collection and that are accruing interest. Loans past-due over 90 days decreased $500 thousand from June 30, 2003 to $9.0 million at June 30, 2004 and decreased $3.2 million from December 31, 2003.
34
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
NONPERFORMING ASSETS AND PAST-DUE LOANS
JUNE 30, | DECEMBER 31, | JUNE 30, | ||||||||||
(IN THOUSANDS) | 2004 | 2003 | 2003 | |||||||||
NONPERFORMING ASSETS: |
||||||||||||
Nonaccrual Loans (1) |
$ | 1,093 | $ | 2,308 | $ | 4,431 | ||||||
Other Real Estate and Repossessed Assets, Net |
4 | 40 | 85 | |||||||||
Total Nonperforming Assets |
$ | 1,097 | $ | 2,348 | $ | 4,516 | ||||||
30-89 DAYS PAST-DUE LOANS (2) |
$ | 33,947 | $ | 32,043 | $ | 23,237 | ||||||
90+ DAYS PAST-DUE LOANS (3) |
$ | 9,004 | $ | 12,178 | $ | 9,513 | ||||||
POTENTIAL PROBLEM LOANS |
$ | 1,578 | $ | 814 | $ | 913 |
(1) | Loans that are in default in either principal or interest for 90 days or more that are not well-secured and in the process of collection, or that are, in managements opinion, doubtful as to the collectibility of either interest or principal. | |||
(2) | Loans contractually past due 30-89 days or more in principal or interest. | |||
(3) | Loans contractually past due 90 days or more in principal or interest that are well-secured and in the process of collection. |
DEPOSITS
Deposits are the Companys primary source of funds. Deposits totaled $4.42 billion as of June 30, 2004, an increase of $130.8 million from $4.29 billion at December 31, 2003 and a decrease of $1.01 billion from $5.43 billion at June 30, 2003. Compared to the June 30, 2003 balance, deposits decreased significantly in all interest-bearing deposit accounts, with the largest decreases occurring in time deposits in both domestic and foreign offices. Time deposits in domestic and foreign offices decreased by $910.0 million and $316.6 million, respectively. The decrease in time deposits in domestic offices was primarily due to the previously described change in how the U.S. Treasury compensates financial agent banks. The amount of DCS purchased in mid-July 2003 upon implementation of the new methodology was approximately $1.11 billion. Demand deposits increased $668.1 million from June 30, 2003 and $616.5 million from December 31, 2003, due to approximately $700.0 million in uncleared checks written when the Company closed several embassy banking deposit accounts. The closing of these accounts is part of the Banks business strategy for exiting its international banking business.
As a means of reducing deposit reserve requirements, Riggs periodically sweeps excess demand funds into money market accounts. The average balances transferred for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, which are not included in demand deposits in the Average Statement of Condition, were $476.1 million and $491.5 million, respectively. For the six month period ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, the average amounts transferred were $476.5 and $481.8, respectively.
FHLB BORROWINGS AND OTHER LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt at June 30, 2004 consisted of $66.5 million, 9.65% fixed rate, subordinated debentures due in 2009, $446.0 million in FHLB advances, $270.0 million in long-term repurchase agreements, and $206.2 million in debt payable to Riggs Capital II, the issuer of the Series C trust preferred securities. At June 30, 2003, long-term debt consisted of the $66.5 million subordinated debentures and $349.0 million in FHLB advances, and at December 31, 2003 long-term debt included the $66.5 million in debentures, $279.0 in FHLB advances, $206.0 million in long-term repurchase agreements, and $360.8 in debt payable to issuers of trust preferred securities. The subordinated debentures cannot be called. Once the remaining maturity term is less than five years, the amount includible in Tier II capital is discounted. At June 16, 2004, the amount includible in Tier II capital decreased to 80%. Every twelve months thereafter the portion includible decreases to 60%, 40% and 20%, respectively. Issuance costs related to this debt are being amortized over the life of the debentures as a component of interest expense, making the effective cost of this debt 9.73%. The FHLB advances at June 30, 2004 have maturity dates through 2007 and carry a blended rate of 2.51%. Of the $349.0 million in FHLB advances at June 30, 2004, $125.0 million is callable in 2005. The long-term repurchase agreements at June 30, 2004 also have maturity dates through 2007 and carry a blended interest rate of 1.60%. $100.0 million of long-term repurchase agreements is callable in 2004 and $50.0 million is callable in 2005.
35
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
The Company adopted FIN46 (Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities) on October 1, 2003. At the time of the adoption of FIN 46 and at December 31, 2003, Riggs owned $60.3 million of the Series A trust preferred securities and $47.6 million of the Series C trust preferred securities. In the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2003, the amount of trust preferred securities owned by Riggs was netted against the outstanding debt of Riggs Capital and Riggs Capital II and reported as minority interest in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. The interest earned by the Company on the trust preferred securities it owned was reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a reduction of minority interest in income of subsidiaries, net of taxes. Beginning with the quarter ended December 31, 2003, the trust preferred securities owned by Riggs are classified as securities held to maturity in the Consolidated Statements of Condition and $360.8 million of debt that the Company has which is payable to Riggs Capital and Riggs Capital II, is included in long-term debt. Beginning the fourth quarter of 2003, interest earned on the trust preferred securities that the Company owns is reflected as a component of interest income and the cost of the debt payable to Riggs Capital and Riggs Capital II is included in interest expense.
During the first quarter of 2004 the Company acquired sufficient Series A securities so that it owned more than 50% of all such securities and, accordingly, the Company reconsolidated the subsidiary that issued the securities beginning in February 2004 as the Company was deemed to be the primary beneficiary of Riggs Capital. At June 30, 2004, the Series A securities are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, net of the Series A securities Riggs owns, as guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures. Since reconsolidation, the cost of these securities are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income as minority interest in income of subsidiaries, net of taxes.
At June 30, 2004, the amount of the Series C, 8.875% securities classified as held to maturity is $49.9 million. See also Shareholders Equity and Regulatory Capital below.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Liquidity
Riggs maintains liquidity to meet the needs of depositors, borrowers and creditors. The Asset/Liability Committee (ALCO) actively analyzes and manages liquidity in coordination with other areas of the organization (see Item 3-Sensitivity to Market Risk). As of June 30, 2004, the Companys liquid assets, which include cash and due from banks, government obligations and other securities, federal funds sold, reverse repurchase agreements and time deposits at other banks, totaled $2.83 billion (42% of total assets). This compares to $2.44 billion (38% of total assets) as of December 31, 2003 and $3.58 billion (50% of total assets) as of June 30, 2003. As of June 30, 2004, $950.9 million of the Companys assets were pledged to secure deposits and other borrowings.
At June 30, 2004, the Bank had approximately $1.23 billion of unencumbered securities, approximately $384.7 million in federal funds sold and other short-term investments and approximately $299.6 million remaining on its Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal Reserve lines of credit for total liquid assets and lines of credit of approximately $1.91 billion. Riggs has additional liquidity available to it through the brokered certificate of deposit market.
FHLB advances have maturity dates through 2007 and bear rates of interest from .67% to 3.70 %. At June 30, 2004, Riggs has $270.0 million of repurchase agreements outstanding, which have maturity dates through 2007 and bear interest rates from .64% to 3.02%. Both the FHLB borrowings and long-term reverse repurchase agreements are discussed in further detail in FHLB Borrowings and Other Long-Term Debt in this Managements Discussion and Analysis.
In accordance with the May 2004 Consent Order, the Bank must obtain prior approval of the OCC before it can declare a dividend to its shareholder, Riggs National Corporation. In accordance with the Cease and Desist Order, Riggs National Corporation must obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Director of the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation of the Federal Reserve before it declares a dividend to its shareholders.
Shareholders Equity and Regulatory Capital
Total shareholders equity as of June 30, 2004 was $327.7 million, a decrease of $45.8 million from year-end 2003 and a decrease of $64.4 million
36
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS, CONTINUED
from a year ago. The decrease from year-end was primarily the result of a net loss of $30.5 million, net unrealized losses on the investment portfolio of $18.6 million, and dividends payments of $2.9 million. This decrease was partially offset by the issuance of common stock in the amount of $6.6 million. The decrease from June 30, 2003 was primarily the result of a net loss of $37.2 million, net unrealized securities losses of $33.4 million, and dividends paid of $5.8 million. This decrease was partially offset by the issuance of common stock of $10.2 million.
Book value per common share was $11.23 as of June 30, 2004 compared to $13.02 as of year-end 2003 and $13.74 as of June 30, 2003. The changes in book value from June 30 of the prior year and from year-end 2003 were primarily the result of the aforementioned changes in equity.
The following are the Companys regulatory capital ratios and those of Riggs Bank N.A., the Companys principal operating subsidiary, as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, and December 31, 2003. It should be noted that the Companys trust preferred securities, which at June 30, 2004 carried a blended interest rate of 8.79%, are included in the calculations for Tier I, as allowed, and Combined Tier I and Tier II capital ratios. This rate is significantly higher than the target federal funds rate at June 30, 2004, of 1.25%. Both Riggs and Riggs Bank N.A. are classified as well-capitalized for purposes of federal banking regulations.
Because of FIN 46 and, as of June 30, 2004 the deconsolidation of one of the two entities that has issued trust preferred securities, regulatory authorities may conclude at a future date that the trust preferred securities should no longer be included as a component of Tier I regulatory capital. The Company has determined that it and the Bank would continue to be well capitalized at June 30, 2004 without including the trust preferred securities as a component of regulatory capital.
During the first quarter of 2004, the Company purchased for cash $19.3 million of trust preferred securities. The average rate on these securities was 8.65% and Riggs paid a premium of $805 thousand. These first quarter purchases will result in annualized interest expense savings of $197 thousand and after-tax minority interest expense savings of $954 thousand.
TO BE WELL | ||||||||||||||||||||
CAPITALIZED | ||||||||||||||||||||
UNDER PROMPT | ||||||||||||||||||||
CORRECTIVE | ||||||||||||||||||||
JUNE 30, | JUNE 30, | DECEMBER 31, | REQUIRED | ACTION | ||||||||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | MINIMUMS | PROVISIONS | ||||||||||||||||
RIGGS NATIONAL CORPORATION: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Tier I |
11.11 | % | 13.24 | % | 12.52 | % | 4.00 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||
Combined Tier I and Tier II |
15.57 | 18.85 | 17.81 | 8.00 | 10.00 | |||||||||||||||
Leverage |
7.03 | 7.82 | 8.41 | 4.00 | 5.00 | |||||||||||||||
RIGGS BANK N.A.: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Tier I |
10.07 | % | 12.10 | % | 11.08 | % | 4.00 | % | 6.00 | % | ||||||||||
Combined Tier I and Tier II |
10.71 | 12.82 | 11.82 | 8.00 | 10.00 | |||||||||||||||
Leverage |
6.47 | 7.21 | 7.52 | 4.00 | 5.00 |
The ratios of total shareholders equity to total assets were 4.86%, 5.86%, and 5.46% at June 30, 2004, December 31, 2003 and June 30, 2003, respectively.
SENSITIVITY TO MARKET RISK
Riggs is exposed to various market risks which are discussed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. Interest-rate risk is a pervasive risk which may have a material impact on the Companys financial performance especially during periods of rapid and/or significant interest rate changes. Because of this, the Company has established an Asset/Liability Committee(ALCO) to manage interest-rate risk. The role of this committee is to manage the asset/liability mix of the Companys operations in an effort to provide a stable net interest margin while maintaining desired levels of liquidity and capital. This entails the management of overall risk in conjunction with the acquisition and deployment of funds based upon ALCOs view of both current and prospective market and economic conditions. Riggs also has risk associated with foreign currency exchange which it attempts to mitigate through various hedges. See Note 7-Accounting for Derivatives.
37
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Riggs manages its interest-rate risk through the use of an income simulation model, which forecasts the impact on net interest income of a variety of different interest rate scenarios. A most likely interest rate scenario is forecasted based upon an analysis of current market conditions and expectations. The model then evaluates the impact on net interest income of rates moving significantly higher or lower than the most likely scenario. Most likely is defined as the outlook of the Banks Treasury Group on the path of future interest rates. As of June 30, 2004, the most likely interest rate scenario calls for the federal funds target rate rising in July 2004 to 1.25%, to 2.0% by December 2004, to 3.0% by December 2005, and to 3.75% by July 2006, holding at that level for the remainder of the forecast horizon. The results are compared to risk tolerance limits set by corporate policy. The models results as of June 30, 2004 are shown below. Current policy establishes limits for possible changes in net interest income for 12 and 36 month horizons. The interest rate scenarios monitored by ALCO are based upon a 100 basis point (1%) gradual increase or decrease in rates over a 12-month time period versus the most likely scenario and a 300 basis point (3%) gradual increase or decrease in rates over a 36-month time period versus the most likely scenario.
INTEREST-RATE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS (1)
MOVEMENTS IN INTEREST RATES FROM JUNE 30, 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
SIMULATED IMPACT OVER | SIMULATED IMPACT OVER | |||||||||||||||
NEXT TWELVE MONTHS | NEXT THIRTY-SIX MONTHS | |||||||||||||||
(In Thousands) | +100BP | -100BP | +300BP | -300BP | ||||||||||||
Simulated Impact Compared With a Most Likely Scenario: |
||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income Increase/(Decrease) |
(0.6 | )% | 1.2 | % | (2.1 | )% | (0.1 | )% | ||||||||
Net Interest Income Increase/(Decrease) |
$ | (824 | ) | $ | 1,721 | $ | (9,239 | ) | $ | (294 | ) |
(1) Key Assumptions:
Assumptions with respect to the models projections of the effect of changes in interest rates on Net Interest Income include:
1. | Target balances for various asset and liability classes, which are solicited from the management of the various units of the Corporation. | |||
2. | Interest rate scenarios which are generated by ALCO for the most likely scenario and are dictated by ALCOs policy for the alternative scenarios. | |||
3. | Spread relationships between various interest rate indices, which are generated by the analysis of historical relationships and ALCO consensus. | |||
4. | Assumptions about the effect of embedded options and prepayment speeds: instruments that are callable are assumed to be called at the first opportunity if an interest rate scenario makes it advantageous for the owner of the call to do so. Prepayment assumptions for mortgage products are derived from accepted industry sources. | |||
5. | Reinvestment rates for funds replacing assets or liabilities that are assumed (through early withdrawal, prepayment, calls, etc.) to run off the balance sheet, which are generated by the spread relationships. | |||
6. | Maturity strategies with respect to assets and liabilities, which are solicited from the management of the various units of the Corporation. |
As of June 30, 2004, the forecasted impact of rates rising or falling 100 basis points versus the most likely scenario over a 12-month time period was a change in net interest income not exceeding 5%, the Company guideline for a 12-month time horizon. For a 300 basis point movement in rates versus the most likely scenario over a 36-month period, the impact on net interest income did not exceed 10%, the Company guideline for a 36-month time horizon. The results of the simulation for June 30, 2004 indicated that the Bank was liability sensitive due to a large portion of its assets being comprised of fixed-rate instruments. Earnings are benefited in a declining rate environment from increasing spreads on fixed-rate assets, but are offset somewhat by floors on deposit rates and faster prepayment rates on mortgage loans and mortgage backed securities.
In managing interest-rate risk, ALCO uses financial derivative instruments, such as interest-rate swaps. Financial derivatives are employed to assist in the management and/or reduction of interest-rate risk and can effectively alter the interest-rate sensitivity of portions of the Statements of Condition for specified periods of time. Along with financial derivative instruments, the income simulation model includes short-term financial instruments, investment securities, loans, deposits, and other borrowings.
Though the methodologies previously discussed provide a meaningful representation of the Companys interest-rate and market risk sensitivity, factors other than changes in the interest-rate environment, such as levels of non-earning assets, and changes in the composition of earning assets and liabilities, may affect the risk sensitivity, and, therefore, net interest income. As with any method of measuring interest-rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the model. As such, the predictive value of our model is not guaranteed.
38
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK, CONTINUED
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Various commitments to extend credit are made in the normal course of banking business. Commitments to extend credit and letters of credit outstanding as of June 30, 2004 and 2003, and December 31, 2003 are:
JUNE 30, | JUNE 30, | DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||||
2004 | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||
Commitments to extend credit |
$ | 1,471,914 | $ | 1,214,979 | $ | 1,327,070 | ||||||
Commercial letters of credit |
34,463 | 50,929 | 46,273 | |||||||||
Stand-by letters of credit |
60,227 | 62,788 | 60,115 |
At June 30, 2004, a liability of $126 thousand existed in the Consolidated Statement of Condition for the stand-by letters of credit compared to $223 thousand at June 30, 2003 and $167 thousand at December 31, 2003.
The above commitment amounts are not reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Condition and many of the commitments will expire without being drawn upon. Such commitments are issued only upon careful evaluation of the financial condition of the customer.
The Company also was committed to fund venture capital investments in the amount of $7.7 million and $12.5 million at June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
CONSENT ORDER, CIVIL MONEY PENALTY AND OTHER MATTERS
In July 2003, Riggs Bank N.A. (the Bank) entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order and a Consent Order (the July 2003 Consent Order) with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the OCC). The provisions of the July 2003 Consent Order are effective until such time as they are amended, suspended, waived or terminated by the OCC. The Consent Order requires the Bank to take various actions to ensure compliance and improve the monitoring of compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and related rules and regulations (BSA).
In May 2004, the Bank entered into an additional Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order and a Consent Order (the May 2004 Consent Order) with the OCC which supplements, but does not replace, the July 2003 Consent Order. At the same time, the Bank entered into a Consent to the Assessment of Civil Money Penalty with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. These consents were entered into as a result of the banking regulators allegations that the Bank (1) violated the BSA and related rules and regulations, (2) failed to comply with the July 2003 Consent Order and (3) failed to implement adequate controls to ensure that the Bank operates in a safe and sound manner with respect to BSA compliance. The May 2004 Consent Order requires the Bank to take various actions as more fully described in the next paragraph, with respect to BSA compliance. Concurrently with the May 2004 Consent Order, the Bank was assessed and paid a civil money penalty of $25 million.
Among the more significant OCC-required actions the Bank is required to take under the May 2004 Consent Order are (1) a review and evaluation of the adequacy of the Banks staffing skills and levels with regard to meeting its obligations under the consent order, (2) an evaluation of the Banks books, records and information systems relative to the BSA and related rules and regulations and development of a plan to correct any noted deficiencies, (3) adoption, implementation and adherence to written policies for internal controls applicable to account relationships and related staffing, (4) the adoption of a Bank dividend policy which requires regulatory approval prior to the declaration of a dividend and (5) adoption, implementation and adherence to an internal audit program that, among other things, is adequate to detect irregularities in the Banks operations, determine the Banks compliance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations and evaluates adherence to established policies and procedures. The May 2004 Consent Order also requires that the Bank review previously filed Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) and Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs) to ascertain that those reports were accurately filed and to review the activity from January 1, 2001 in all accounts identified as high risk to ensure that SARs have been filed as appropriate.
Also in May 2004, the Company and Riggs International Banking Corporation (RIBC), the Companys Miami Edge Act subsidiary, entered into a Cease and Desist Order with the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve) which generally requires that (1) the Company hire an independent consultant to review the functions and performance of the Board of Directors and senior management, (2) the Companys Board of Directors submit a plan to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond to strengthen board oversight of the management and
39
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK, CONTINUED
operations of the Company and its subsidiaries, (3) the Company submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond a plan to improve the risk management practices of the Company and its subsidiaries, and (4) the Company submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond an internal audit program. The Cease and Desist Order also generally requires that (1) RIBC submit a plan to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta to ensure compliance with all applicable provisions of the BSA and related rules and regulations, (2) RIBC submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta a customer due diligence program (3) RIBC engage the services of a qualified independent firm to conduct a review of account and transaction activity to determine whether suspicious activities in accounts, if any, were properly identified and reported, and (4) RIBC submit a plan to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta to ensure compliance with regulations of the U.S. Department of the Treasurys Office of Foreign Assets Control. Once such plans are approved by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, as the case may be, the Cease and Desist Order requires the Company and RIBC, as the case may be, adopt and comply with such plans. The Cease and Desist Order does not impose a monetary penalty, but does require, however, that the Company obtain prior approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Director of the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation of the Federal Reserve prior to declaring or paying dividends, paying interest on its trust preferred securities or acquiring its own stock. The operations of RIBC are currently being wound down.
The July 2003 Consent Order, the May 2004 Consent Orders and the Cease and Desist Order allow the regulators to take whatever future actions deemed necessary to fulfill their regulatory obligations and remain in effect until waived or terminated by the regulators.
Primarily as a direct result of the BSA criticisms, each of the Bank and the Company has been designated as being in a troubled condition by the OCC and the Federal Reserve, respectively. A bank or bank holding company that is classified as being in a troubled condition must have any new director or executive officer approved in advance by the OCC or Federal Reserve, as the case may be, and is subject to restrictions on making severance payments to its directors, officers and employees under the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations (FDIC) golden parachute regulations. In addition, entities that are in a troubled condition are subject to increased regulatory supervision. The increased regulatory supervision has resulted and is expected to continue to result in more frequent and intensive-examinations.
The Companys BSA-related regulatory problems have significantly increased its costs of doing business and the company expects to continue to incur significant expenses in connection therewith. During the first half of 2004, Riggs had approximately $7.9 million of consulting and legal costs attributable to these matters. Because it has been designated as being in a troubled condition, the Banks FDIC quarterly insurance assessment increased by approximately $250 thousand from the first to the second quarter of 2004.
The July 2003 Consent Order is included in a Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 17, 2003 and the May 2004 Consent Order and the Cease and Desist Order are included in a Current Report on Form 8-K dated May 17, 2004.
As noted in Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2004, the Bank serves as trustee for the MEPT. The governing document provides for amendment of the trust. Such amendment may include the naming of a new trustee and subsequent transitioning of the trustee from Riggs to another entity. Riggs continues to negotiate with other participants in the trust regarding the transitioning to another trustee and the amount and timing of the consideration to be received by the Company.
PENDING MERGER
On July 16, 2004, the PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC) and Riggs National Corporation entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) under which PNC agreed to acquire the Company.
Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, Riggs National Corporation will merge into PNC and Riggs Bank will merge into PNC Bank, National Association. Riggs shareholders will be entitled to receive the merger consideration in shares of PNCs common stock or in cash, subject to proration. The aggregate consideration, based upon the number of shares outstanding at the time the Merger Agreement was signed is composed of 7,533,648 shares of PNCs common stock and $321 million in cash, subject to adjustment. The actual value of the merger consideration to be paid upon closing will depend on the average stock price of PNCs common stock for the five trading days prior to the merger and the cash and stock components on a per Riggs share basis will be determined at that time based on the average PNC common stock price so that each share of Riggs receives consideration representing equal value based on that average price. Riggs options outstanding as of the merger will be cashed out. Total consideration paid by PNC is expected to be approximately $774 million based upon PNCs stock value and the number of Riggs shares outstanding at the time of the merger announcement.
In connection with the merger, Riggs has agreed to coordinate its dividend record and payment dates with those of PNC by using the same record and payment dates used by PNC for payments of cash dividends on PNC common stock. Accordingly, Riggs expects to pay its next quarterly dividend in October 2004, subject to prior regulatory approval.
PNC has indicated to Riggs that it anticipates that the merger will be completed in the first quarter of 2005.
40
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK, CONTINUED
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Subsequent to June 30, 2004, Riggs entered into an agreement to sell a bank property in London and agreed to a Letter of Intent to sell the corporate aircraft formerly used in support of its international operations. The anticipated capital gain on the bank property is approximately $2.5 million. Net proceeds from the sale of the corporate aircraft approximate its carrying value and the transaction is expected to be completed within the next 30 days.
The Company retained the firm of Crowe Chizek (Crowe) to manage Project EPS, a two year long project to modernize the Companys technology platform and re-design various operational processes. Under the terms of the Master Professional Services Agreement (MPSA) with Crowe, Crowe was to be compensated in part based upon the monetary benefit derived by the Company as a result of specific projects and initiatives managed by them. On several of these projects and initiatives, Riggs and Crowe do not agree as to the amount of benefits that Riggs has derived and, in July 2004, the Company and Crowe mutually agreed to attempt to resolve the matter through the mediation process set forth in the MPSA. Crowe has also alleged material default by the Company of a number of requirements of the MPSA. The Company is analyzing the Crowe default claims.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable (not absolute) assurance that its objectives will be met. Furthermore, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Companys management, with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.
Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have not been any changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
RIGGS NATIONAL CORPORATION
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | |
In the normal course of business we are involved in various types of litigation and disputes that may lead to litigation. The Company believes that these pending or unasserted legal actions will not have a material impact on its financial condition or future operations. | ||
On April 7, 2004 and April 28, 2004, Company shareholders filed substantially similar purported derivative actions in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County against the Companys Board of Directors. On April 17, 2004, Company shareholders filed a purported derivative action in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia against the Companys Board of Directors, substantially similar to the actions filed by Company shareholders in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County. The complaints each allege that the Company violated its fiduciary duties in relation to a variety of matters, including, among others, the compliance by the Company with various anti-money laundering laws and various aspects of the Banks international and embassy businesses. The lawsuits each seek, on behalf of the Company, among other things, monetary damages and certain types of equitable relief. | ||
The Company is subject to numerous investigations by, and inquiries from, various U.S. and foreign governmental agencies and authorities. Some of the investigations and inquiries involve current or former employees of the Company. These investigations and inquiries include, among others things, accounts maintained by Equatorial Guinea, Saudi Arabia and Augusto Pinochet and the Companys anti-money laundering and BSA compliance. In connection with investigations regarding the Companys Chief Risk Officer resulting from his formerly being the OCC examiner in charge of the Bank, the Company has placed such officer on leave. The Company is currently in the process of attempting to review these matters. It is not possible for the Company to predict the impact or effect of these investigations, inquiries and matters. | ||
Certain Riggs Bank directors or executive officers have been added as defendants to a criminal Spanish court action involving the accounts of Augusto Pinochet. |
41
PART II OTHER INFORMATION, CONTINUED
ITEM 2.
|
CHANGES IN SECURITIES | |
Not applicable. | ||
ITEM 3.
|
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES | |
Not applicable. | ||
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS | |
The Annual Meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation was held on May 27, 2004, in Washington, D.C. Chairman of the Board Robert L. Allbritton presided and 28,827,653 of the 28,987,512 shares outstanding as of the record date of April 20, 2004 were represented in person or by proxy. | ||
1-Election of Directors | ||
Nominees for membership on the Board of Directors of the Corporation, listed below, were elected by the shareholders. The following schedule lists the number of shares cast for each nominee: |
Total | Total | |||||||
Votes For | Votes Withheld | |||||||
Robert L. Allbritton |
22,819,584 | 5,307,984 | ||||||
J. Carter Beese, Jr. |
22,902,327 | 5,307,984 | ||||||
Charles A. Camalier, III |
21,519,669 | 5,307,984 | ||||||
Lawrence I. Hebert |
22,908,471 | 5,307,984 | ||||||
Steven B. Pfeiffer |
21,630,750 | 5,307,984 | ||||||
Robert L. Sloan |
21,907,171 | 5,307,984 | ||||||
Anthony P. Terracciano |
25,816,407 | 5,307,984 | ||||||
Jack Valenti |
21,817,175 | 5,307,984 | ||||||
William L. Walton |
24,857,462 | 5,307,984 | ||||||
Eddie N. Williams |
24,394,034 | 5,307,984 |
2-Proposal to Ratify the Election of the Independent Public Accountants | ||
By a vote of 22,421,215 For, to 4,383,858 Against, with 22,581 Abstaining, the Corporations shareholders adopted a proposal to ratify KPMG LLP as the independent accountants. KPMG LLP has served as the Corporations independent public accountants since March 2002. | ||
3-Proposal to Publish Statement of Political Contributions | ||
By a vote of 2,194,663 For, to 18,119,825 Against, with 863,093 Abstaining, the Corporations shareholders rejected a proposal to have the Corporation publish in newspapers of general circulation in major U.S. cities a detailed statement of political contributions made by the Corporation. |
42
PART II OTHER INFORMATION, CONTINUED
ITEM 5.
|
OTHER INFORMATION | |
Not applicable. | ||
ITEM 6.
|
EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K |
(a) | Exhibits | |||
The exhibits listed on page 44 are incorporated by reference or filed herewith in response to this item. | ||||
(b) | Reports on Form 8-K | |||
On April 29, 2004, the Company furnished a Form 8-K to announce earnings for the quarter and year ended March 31, 2004. | ||||
On May 13, 2004, the Company filed a Form 8-K to announce it had entered into a Stipulation and Consent to the Issuance of a Consent Order with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and a Consent Order of Civil Money Penalty. | ||||
On May 27, 2004, the Company filed a Form 8-K to announce the retirement of Timothy C. Coughlin, President of Riggs National Corporation. | ||||
On May 28, 2004, the Company filed a Form 8-K to announce it had hired Lehman Brothers to assist it in evaluating strategic business alternatives, including a possible business combination with a third party. |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
RIGGS NATIONAL CORPORATION
Date:
|
August 9, 2004 | /s/ ROBERT L. ALLBRITTON | ||
Robert L. Allbritton Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
||||
Date:
|
August 9, 2004 | /s/ STEVEN T. TAMBURO | ||
Steven T. Tamburo Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) |
43
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT | DESCRIPTION | PAGES | ||||
NO. | ||||||
(2.1)
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger between The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and
Riggs National Corporation, dated as of July 16, 2004 |
45-95 | ||||
(10.2)
|
Lawrence Connell employment agreement, dated April 6, 2004 | 96-103 | ||||
(31.1)
|
Chief Executive Officer Section 302 Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q | 104 | ||||
(31.2)
|
Chief Financial Officer Section 302 Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q | 105 | ||||
(32.1)
|
Chief Executive Officer Section 906 Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q | 106 | ||||
(32.2)
|
Chief Financial Officer Section 906 Certification of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q | 107 |
(Exhibits omitted are not required or not applicable.)
44