Back to GetFilings.com

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002

Or

For the transition period from ______to ______

Commission file number: 1-1969

ARBITRON INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

142 West 57th Street
New York, New York 10019
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(212) 887-1300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [  ]

     The registrant had 29,554,506 shares of common stock, par value $0.50 per share, outstanding as of October 31, 2002.

ARBITRON INC.

INDEX

2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ARBITRON INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

ARBITRON INC.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

ARBITRON INC.
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

5

ARBITRON INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)

See notes to consolidated financial statements

6

ARBITRON INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2002
(unaudited)

1.     Basis of Presentation and Consolidation

Presentation

     Arbitron Inc. (“Arbitron” or the “Company”) was formerly known as Ceridian Corporation (“Ceridian”). Prior to March 31, 2001, Ceridian, a publicly traded company, had as its principal lines of business the human resource service businesses, the Comdata business, which provided transaction processing and regulatory compliance services for the transportation industry, and the radio audience measurement business.

     On March 30, 2001, Ceridian effected a reverse spin-off, which we refer to as the “spin-off.” In connection with the spin-off, the assets and liabilities associated with the human resource service businesses and Comdata subsidiaries were transferred to a newly formed company named “New Ceridian”. The radio audience measurement business stayed with Ceridian. Ceridian then distributed the stock of New Ceridian to its existing stockholders. As a result, New Ceridian is now a separate publicly traded corporation. In connection with the spin-off, Ceridian changed its name to Arbitron Inc. and effected a one-for-five reverse stock split, and New Ceridian changed its name to Ceridian Corporation. Because of the relative significance of the businesses transferred to New Ceridian, New Ceridian was considered the accounting successor to Ceridian for financial reporting purposes.

     For periods prior to the spin-off, the Company’s results were included in Ceridian’s consolidated income tax filings. Subsequent to the spin-off, deferred tax assets consisting of net operating loss and credit carryforwards were transferred from Ceridian to Arbitron, along with timing differences related to the Arbitron business. The amounts transferred were finalized during the three month period ended September 30, 2002, with the filing of the income tax returns for periods ended December 31, 2001 and prior, and resulted in an increase of deferred tax assets of $10.7 million with a corresponding credit to stockholders’ equity.

     The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (the “U.S.”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered for fair presentation have been included. The consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2001 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. for complete financial statements. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Arbitron Inc. annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

Consolidation

     The consolidated financial statements of Arbitron reflect the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Arbitron Inc. and its subsidiaries: Arbitron Holdings Inc., Ceridian Infotech (India) Private Limited, CSW Research Limited and Euro Fieldwork Limited. In periods ended prior to March 31, 2001, the Company’s financial statements reflected the combined financial position and results of operations of Arbitron (The Arbitron Company which was a division of Ceridian and CSW Research Limited, Euro Fieldwork Limited and Ceridian Infotech (India) Private Limited, each of which was a wholly owned subsidiary of Ceridian).

7

ARBITRON INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
September 30, 2002
(unaudited)

2.     Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

     Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, was adopted on January 1, 2002, with the exception of a provision for acquisitions occurring after June 30, 2001, which was adopted on July 1, 2001. Under SFAS No. 142, the Company is no longer amortizing goodwill, rather goodwill is measured for impairment on an annual basis under the guidance set forth in the standard. Additionally, SFAS No. 142 requires disclosure of adjusted net income and earnings per share for prior periods as if the standard was in effect for all periods presented.

     Intangible assets with finite lives are being amortized to expense over their estimated useful lives. As of September 30, 2002, the Company has no other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives.

     The following unaudited information presents the results of operations of the Company as if SFAS No. 142 had been adopted on January 1, 2001 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data).

     The Company has completed its assessment of the carrying value of goodwill as of January 1, 2002 and has determined no impairment existed as of that date.

3. Purchase Acquisition

     On July 2, 2001, the Company acquired all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of the radio network audience measurement service business of Statistical Research, Inc. (“SRI”), known as Radio’s All Dimension Audience Research (“RADAR”). The RADAR service measures national radio audiences and the audience size of network radio programs and commercials. The primary reason for the acquisition was to gain entry into the network radio measurement business.

     On June 28, 2002, the Company paid the final installment of $11.0 million, bringing the aggregate consideration paid to $25.3 million. In connection with the acquisition, the Company entered into several operational agreements with SRI, including a software development agreement pursuant to which SRI adapted RADAR to the Company’s diary based ratings measurement method.

8

ARBITRON INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
September 30, 2002
(unaudited)

     The following unaudited pro forma information presents the results of operations of the Company as if the RADAR acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2001 (Dollars in thousands, except per share data).

4.     Long-term Debt

     Long-term debt consists of the following (Dollars in thousands):

     On January 31, 2001, the Company entered into a $225.0 million five-year revolving credit agreement with a consortium of banks (“Credit Facility”). On March 29, 2001, in connection with the spin-off, $200.0 million was drawn on the facility and distributed to Ceridian.

     The Credit Facility has two borrowing options, a Eurodollar rate option or a base rate option, as defined in the agreement. Under the Eurodollar option, the Company may elect interest periods of one, two, three or six months at the inception date and each renewal date. Borrowings under the Eurodollar option bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin of 2.00% to 2.75%. Borrowings under the base rate option bear interest at the higher of the lead lender’s prime rate or the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis points, plus a margin of .50% to 1.25%. The specific margins, under both options, are determined based on the Company’s ratio of indebtedness to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (leverage ratio), and are adjusted every ninety days. The agreement contains a commitment fee provision whereby the Company is charged a fee based on the unused portion of the facility. Under the terms of the Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain certain other financial ratios, in addition to the leverage ratio, and meet other financial conditions. The agreement limits, among other things, the Company’s ability to sell assets, incur additional indebtedness, grant or incur liens on its assets, repay indebtedness, make investments or acquisitions, repurchase or redeem capital stock and engage in certain mergers or consolidations. The agreement prohibits the payment of cash dividends through the year ending December 31, 2002. The interest rate on the Credit Facility borrowings as of September 30, 2002 was 7.27%.

     The commitment under the Credit Facility, which was $225.0 million at inception, was reduced to $185.2 million on April 1, 2002 in accordance with the mandatory commitment reduction and excess cash flow provisions. Available borrowings under the Credit Facility were $60.2 million as of September 30, 2002.

9

ARBITRON INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
September 30, 2002
(unaudited)

     Upon consummation of the spin-off, the Company issued $50.0 million of senior secured notes due January 31, 2008. In connection with the spin-off, the Company distributed the $50.0 million of note proceeds to Ceridian. The notes bear interest at a fixed rate of 9.96%. The senior secured notes agreement contains covenants similar to the Credit Facility. The agreement also contains a make-whole provision that applies in the event of early prepayment of principal.

5.     Interest Rate Swap

     The Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement effective on March 29, 2001 to hedge its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates relating to its outstanding variable rate debt. The contract’s notional amount was $200.0 million at inception, and declines over the life of the contract in proportion to the Company’s estimated outstanding balance on its revolving credit agreement. Under the terms of the contract, the Company will pay a fixed rate of 5.02% and receive LIBOR, which resets every 90 days. The contract matures on December 31, 2004. The interest rate swap agreement was designated as a cash flow hedge, and was designed to be entirely effective by matching the terms of the swap agreement with the debt. The base rate for both the variable rate debt and the swap is LIBOR and the instruments have the same renewal dates over the lives of the instruments. The fair value of the cash flow hedge was recorded as a non-current liability and the offsetting unrealized loss was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001.

     The Company’s risk management objective for entering into the interest rate swap was to mitigate its exposure to interest rate risk. The Company’s initial strategy was to lock into a fixed rate of interest with a pay-fixed, receive-variable interest rate swap, thereby hedging exposure to the variability in future cash flows.

6.     Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

     Changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) for the nine month period ended September 30, 2002 were as follows:

10

ARBITRON INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — Continued
September 30, 2002
(unaudited)

7.     Net Income and Pro Forma Net Income per Weighted Average Common Share

     The computations of basic and diluted net income per common share for the three months ended September 30, 2001 and 2002, and the nine months ended September 30, 2002 are based on Arbitron’s weighted average shares of common stock and potentially dilutive securities outstanding, respectively. The pro forma net income per weighted average common share computations for the nine months ended September 30, 2001, are based on Ceridian’s weighted average number of shares of Ceridian common stock and potentially dilutive securities outstanding through March 30, 2001 (the spin-off date), and Arbitron’s weighted average shares of common stock and potentially dilutive securities outstanding thereafter.

     Potentially dilutive securities are calculated in accordance with the treasury stock method, which assumes that the proceeds from the exercise of all stock options are used to repurchase the Company’s common stock at the average market price for the period.

8.     Comprehensive Income

     The Company’s comprehensive income is comprised of net income, foreign currency translation adjustments and changes in unrealized gains and losses on the interest rate swap agreement.

     The components of comprehensive income are as follows (Dollars in thousands):

11

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Arbitron’s consolidated financial statements and the notes related to those consolidated financial statements contained elsewhere in this Form 10-Q.

Forward-Looking Statements

     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements regarding Arbitron in this document that are not historical in nature, particularly those that utilize terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “likely,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “believes” or “plans,” or comparable terminology, are forward-looking statements based on current expectations about future events, which Arbitron has derived from information currently available to it. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our results to be materially different from results implied in such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include whether we will be able to:

•		renew contracts with large customers as they expire;
•		successfully execute our business strategies, including timely implementation of our Portable People Meter (PPM) and our webcast ratings services, as well as expansion of international operations;
•		effectively manage the impact of further consolidation in the radio industry;
•		keep up with rapidly changing technological needs of our customer base, including creating new products and services that meet those needs; and
•		successfully manage the impact on our business of any economic downturn generally and in the advertising market in particular.

     Additional important factors known to Arbitron that could cause forward-looking statements to turn out to be incorrect are identified and discussed from time to time in Arbitron’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including in particular the risk factors discussed under the caption “ITEM 1. BUSINESS – Business Risks” in Arbitron’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001.

     The forward-looking statements contained in this document speak only as of the date hereof, and Arbitron undertakes no obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Overview

     Arbitron Inc. was formerly known as Ceridian Corporation (“Ceridian”). Prior to March 31, 2001, Ceridian, a publicly traded company, had as its principal lines of business the human resource service businesses, the Comdata business, which provided transaction processing and regulatory compliance services for the transportation industry, and the radio audience measurement business.

     On March 30, 2001, Ceridian effected a reverse spin-off, which we refer to as the “spin-off.” In connection with the spin-off, the assets and liabilities associated with the human resource service businesses and Comdata subsidiaries were transferred to New Ceridian. The radio audience measurement business stayed with Ceridian. Ceridian then distributed the stock of New Ceridian to its existing stockholders. As a result, New Ceridian is now a separate publicly traded corporation. In connection with the spin-off, Ceridian changed its name to Arbitron Inc. and effected a one-for-five reverse stock split, and New Ceridian changed its name to Ceridian Corporation. Because of the relative significance of the businesses transferred to New Ceridian, New Ceridian was considered the accounting successor to Ceridian for financial reporting purposes.

     The terms “Arbitron” or the “Company” as used in this document shall include Arbitron Inc. and its subsidiaries.

12

     The consolidated financial statements of Arbitron reflect the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows of Arbitron Inc. and its subsidiaries: Arbitron Holdings Inc., Ceridian Infotech (India) Private Limited, CSW Research Limited and Euro Fieldwork Limited. In periods ended prior to March 31, 2001, the Company’s financial statements reflected the combined financial position and results of operations of Arbitron (The Arbitron Company which was a division of Ceridian and CSW Research Limited, Euro Fieldwork Limited and Ceridian Infotech (India) Private Limited, each of which was a wholly owned subsidiary of Ceridian).

     Arbitron’s radio audience measurement business has accounted for a majority of its revenue. In recent years, significant consolidation of radio station ownership has tended to intensify competition within the radio industry and between radio and other forms of media for advertising dollars. At the same time, audiences have become more fragmented as a result of the greatly increased programming choices and entertainment and media options. Consequently, the increased competition together with the desire for more complex information have driven demand by radio broadcasters, advertising agencies and advertisers for Arbitron’s audience measurement information. In addition, although radio industry consolidation has led to the increased concentration of Arbitron’s customer base, it has also contributed to an increase in the number of stations subscribing for the ratings service as well as increases in sales of Arbitron’s analytical software applications and other services.

     Infinity Broadcasting is Arbitron’s second largest customer and represented approximately 11% of Arbitron’s revenue in 2001. Certain contracts with Infinity Broadcasting, which collectively accounted for nine percent of Arbitron’s revenue in 2001, expired at the end of 2001 and renewal negotiations commenced during the fourth quarter of 2001. In July 2002, Arbitron entered into an extension of the radio ratings license agreement with Infinity Broadcasting, which ends on March 31, 2003, and gives their stations access to our quarterly radio ratings up to the release of the Spring 2003 radio survey as well as access to additional services currently provided. In addition, in July 2002, Arbitron also entered into an extension of the radio ratings license agreement with ABC Radio, which gives their stations access to our quarterly radio ratings up to the release of the Spring 2003 radio survey. These extensions with Infinity Broadcasting and ABC Radio are for significantly shorter terms than the typical four to five year agreements generally entered into between Arbitron and its customers. Arbitron believes that this is a result of customers currently waiting for a more detailed analysis of the PPM Philadelphia test market and a rollout plan for other major markets. Additionally, future contracts with other customers may be of a shorter than normal term until the PPM data analysis is available and the PPM rollout plan is established. Arbitron cannot give any assurances that it could replace the revenue that could be lost if a key customer failed to renew its agreement with Arbitron. The loss of a key customer would adversely affect Arbitron’s business and operating results.

     On May 31, 2000, Arbitron entered into an agreement with Nielsen Media Research, Inc., a provider of United States television audience measurement services, under which Arbitron granted Nielsen Media Research an option to join Arbitron in the potential commercial deployment of the Portable People Meter in the United States. In the event Nielsen Media Research exercises the option, the parties would form a joint venture to commercially deploy and operate the business of utilizing the Portable People Meter for the collection of respondent listening and viewing information used to produce radio and television audience ratings. Recognizing that the successful commercial deployment of the Portable People Meter is uncertain and risky, at the present time, Arbitron believes that a joint venture with Nielsen Media Research would create a significantly greater likelihood of successful commercial deployment than other alternatives.

     The parties would each use the data generated by the jointly-deployed Portable People Meter in creating their own media measurement services. Generally, each company would be licensed to use the Portable People Meter data to create measurement services for particular media. The division of revenues from Internet data remains to be negotiated by the parties. The costs, expenses and capital expenditures for operating a joint venture would be shared by Arbitron and Nielsen Media Research based on the degree to which use of the Portable People Meter displaces costs at each company. Arbitron would receive a royalty from Nielsen Media Research.

     In response to the requests of both our customers and Nielsen Media Research, Arbitron has delayed the commercialization timetable for PPM, as well as the timing for the possible formation of a joint venture with Nielsen Media Research for the commercial deployment of the Portable People Meter in the United States. The company continues to discuss the formation of a PPM joint venture with Nielsen and has entered into discussions with them to expand their participation in the Philadelphia market trial. During the first half of 2003, we will perform a series of methods tests and research in Philadelphia. We will also test a number of marketing research applications of PPM and mount a major response rate test.

Critical Accounting Policies

     Critical accounting policies are those that are both important to the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and require management’s most difficult, complex or subjective judgments. The Company’s most critical accounting policies relate to the capitalization of software development costs and impairments of assets.

     The Company capitalizes software development costs with respect to major product initiatives or enhancements, which are incurred during the period from the time of technological feasibility until the time that the software is ready for use. To the extent that software is being developed for use by customers or to support data collection activities, the Company also considers the recovery of such costs through future revenue streams in its decision to capitalize software development costs. Once the software is placed in service, the capitalized costs are generally amortized over periods of three to five years. If events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of software may not be recovered, a recoverability analysis is performed based on estimated undiscounted cash flows to be generated from the software in the future. If the analysis indicates that the carrying value is not recoverable from future cash flows, the software cost is written down to estimated fair value and an impairment loss is recognized. The Company’s estimates are subject to revision as market conditions and the Company’s assessments of them change.

13

     In 2002, and annually thereafter, the Company will assess the fair value of goodwill. To the extent that information indicates that the carrying value of the assets exceeds their estimated fair values, the Company will recognize an impairment charge. The Company’s estimates of fair value will be subject to revision as market conditions and the Company’s assessments of them change.

New Accounting Pronouncements

     Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142 was adopted on January 1, 2002, with the exception of a provision for acquisitions occurring after June 30, 2001 which was adopted on July 1, 2001. Under SFAS No. 142, the Company’s goodwill is no longer amortized to expense, rather goodwill is measured for impairment on an annual basis under the guidance set forth in the standard. Additionally, SFAS No. 142 requires disclosure of adjusted net income and earnings per share for prior periods as if the standard was in effect for all periods presented. For the year ending December 31, 2002, the Company expects that the reduction in amortization expense, related to goodwill existing as of June 30, 2001, will increase net income by approximately $1.7 million. If the Company had adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 142 on January 1, 2001, net income and diluted net income per weighted average share would have been $13,282 and $0.45, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2001, and $35,143 and $1.19, respectively, or the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2002 to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2001

     The following table sets forth information with respect to the consolidated statements of income of Arbitron.

Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

14

     Revenue. Revenue increased 6.0% from $65.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $69.6 million for the same period in 2002. Increases in the ratings and qualitative subscriber base, analytical software applications, escalations in multi-year customer contracts and contract renewals accounted for the $3.9 million increase.

     Cost of Revenue. Cost of revenue increased 5.9% from $19.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $20.8 million for the same period in 2002, and was nearly constant as a percentage of revenue, which was 30.0% in 2001 and 29.9% in 2002. The dollar increase of $1.1 million is mainly attributed to PPM costs associated with the Philadelphia market test ($1.0 million) and higher diary and data collection costs ($0.5 million). The increases were partially offset by lower RADAR costs in 2002 ($0.5 million) resulting from the replacement of RADAR’s former telephone survey process with Arbitron’s existing diary sampling process.

     Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 8.3% from $12.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $13.5 million for the same period in 2002 and increased as a percentage of revenue from 19.0% in 2001 to 19.4% in 2002. The dollar increase of $1.0 million is attributed to increases in expenses related to PPM ($0.4 million), increases in facilities costs ($0.4 million) and higher overall costs in U.S. Media ($1.0 million). These increases were partially offset by the elimination of goodwill amortization, in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which was $0.4 million in 2001, and a decrease in webcast ratings costs ($0.4 million). The Company decreased its spending related to webcast ratings due to the slower than anticipated growth of the webcast ratings market.

     Research and Development. Research and development decreased 6.5% from $5.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $5.5 million for the same period in 2002 and decreased as a percentage of revenue from 9.0% in 2001 to 8.0% in 2002. The dollar decrease is mainly attributed to decreases in webcast ratings ($0.2 million), and PPM costs ($0.3 million) and lower costs related to RADAR ($0.2 million). These decreases were offset by an increase in U.S. Media costs ($ 0.3 million).

     Operating Income. Operating income increased 7.7% from $27.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $29.7 million for the same period in 2002. Operating margin increased from 42.0% in 2001 to 42.7% in 2002.

     Proportionate Share of Net Loss of Affiliate. Proportionate share of net loss of affiliate decreased 52.0% from a loss of $1.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to a loss of $0.7 million for the same period in 2002.

     Interest Expense. Interest expense decreased 20.6% from $5.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $4.1 million for the same period in 2002. The decrease is the result of a reduction in the debt principal balance outstanding during the quarter under the Company’s revolving credit facility in 2002.

     Income Tax Expense. Arbitron’s effective tax rate was 39.5% and 38.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2001 and 2002, respectively. The 1.0% decrease in the Company’s effective income tax rate resulted from the discontinuance of goodwill amortization in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, and a change in certain state tax apportionment factors following the spin-off from Ceridian.

     Net Income. Net income increased 20.0% from $12.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $15.4 million for the same period in 2002.

     EBITDA. EBITDA increased 9.4% from $27.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2001 to $30.1 million for the same period in 2002. Arbitron has presented EBITDA as supplemental information that management of Arbitron believes may be useful to some investors in evaluating Arbitron because it is widely used as a measure to evaluate a company's operating performance before interest expense, as well as to evaluate its operating cash flow. EBITDA is calculated by adding back net interest expense, income tax expense, depreciation and amortization on property and equipment and amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets to net income. EBITDA should not be considered a substitute either for net income, as an indicator of Arbitron’s operating performance, or for cash flow, as measure of Arbitron’s liquidity. In addition, because EBITDA is not calculated identically by all companies, the presentation here may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies.

15

Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001

     The following table sets forth information with respect to the consolidated statements of income of Arbitron.

Consolidated Statements of Income
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)