Back to GetFilings.com
1996
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(MARK
ONE)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
[X]
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES
[_]
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO
COMMISSION FILE NO. 1-2438
INLAND STEEL COMPANY
(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)
36-1262880
DELAWARE (I.R.S. EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)
(STATE OF INCORPORATION)
30 WEST MONROE STREET, CHICAGO, 60603
ILLINOIS (ZIP CODE)
(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE
OFFICES)
REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE: (312) 346-0300
REGISTRANT MEETS THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN GENERAL INSTRUCTION J(1)(A) AND
(B) OF FORM 10-K AND IS THEREFORE FILING THIS FORM WITH THE REDUCED DISCLOSURE
FORMAT.
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTERED
------------------- ---------------------
FIRST MORTGAGE BONDS:
SERIES R, 7.90% DUE JANUARY 15, 2007 NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC.
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(G) OF THE ACT:
NONE
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS
REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. YES u . NO .
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK IF DISCLOSURE OF DELINQUENT FILERS PURSUANT TO ITEM
405 REGULATION S-K IS NOT CONTAINED HEREIN, AND WILL NOT BE CONTAINED, TO THE
BEST OF REGISTRANT'S KNOWLEDGE, IN ANY AMENDMENT TO THIS FORM 10-K. [X]
THE NUMBER OF SHARES OF COMMON STOCK ($1.00 PAR VALUE) OF THE REGISTRANT
OUTSTANDING AS OF MARCH 12, 1997 WAS 980, ALL OF WHICH SHARES WERE OWNED BY
INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Inland Steel Company (the "Company"), a Delaware corporation and a wholly
owned subsidiary of Inland Steel Industries, Inc. ("Industries"), is an
integrated domestic steel company. The Company produces and sells a wide range
of steels, of which approximately 99% consists of carbon and high-strength
low-alloy steel grades. It is also a participant in certain iron ore
production and steel-finishing joint ventures.
The Company has a single business segment, which is comprised of the
operating companies and divisions involved in the manufacturing of basic steel
products and in related raw materials operations.
OPERATIONS
General
The Company is directly engaged in the production and sale of steel and
related products and the transportation of iron ore, limestone and certain
other commodities (primarily for its own use) on the Great Lakes. Certain
subsidiaries and associated companies of the Company are engaged in the mining
and pelletizing of iron ore and in the operation of a cold-rolling mill and
steel galvanizing lines. All raw steel made by the Company is produced at its
Indiana Harbor Works located in East Chicago, Indiana, which also has
facilities for converting the steel produced into semi-finished and finished
steel products.
The Company has two divisions--the Inland Steel Flat Products Company
division and the Inland Steel Bar Company division. The Flat Products division
manages the Company's iron ore operations, conducts its ironmaking operations,
and produces the major portion of its raw steel. This division also
manufactures and sells steel sheet, strip and certain related semi-finished
products for the automotive, appliance, office furniture, steel service center
and electrical motor markets. The Flat Products division closed its plate
operations at year-end 1995. The Bar division manufactures and sells special
quality bars and certain related semi-finished products for forgers, steel
service centers, heavy equipment manufacturers, cold finishers and the
transportation industry.
The Company and Nippon Steel Corporation ("NSC") are participants, through
subsidiaries, in two joint ventures that operate steel-finishing facilities
near New Carlisle, Indiana. The total cost of these two facilities was
approximately $1.1 billion. I/N Tek, owned 60% by a wholly owned subsidiary of
the Company and 40% by an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of NSC, operates a
cold-rolling mill that achieved operation at its design capability in 1992.
I/N Kote, owned equally by wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company and NSC
(indirect in the case of NSC), operates two galvanizing lines that achieved
operation at their design capacity in 1993. The Company is also a participant,
through a subsidiary, in another galvanizing joint venture located near
Walbridge, Ohio.
Raw Steel Production and Mill Shipments
The following table shows, for the five years indicated, the Company's
production of raw steel and, based upon American Iron and Steel Institute
data, its share of total domestic raw steel production:
RAW STEEL PRODUCTION
----------------------------------
INLAND STEEL
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AS A % OF
COMPANY U.S. STEEL
(000 TONS*) INDUSTRY
------------ -----------------
1996................................... 5,519 5.3%**
1995................................... 5,419 5.2
1994................................... 5,309 5.3
1993................................... 5,003 5.2
1992................................... 4,740 5.2
- --------
*Net tons of 2,000 pounds.
**Based on preliminary data from the American Iron and Steel Institute.
1
The annual raw steelmaking capacity of the Company was reduced to 6.0
million net tons from 6.5 million net tons effective September 1, 1991, as the
Company ceased making ingots. The basic oxygen process accounted for 92% and
91% of raw steel production of the Company in 1996 and 1995, respectively. The
remainder of such production was accounted for by electric furnace.
The total tonnage of steel mill products shipped by the Company for each of
the five years 1992 through 1996 was 5.1 million tons in 1996; 5.1 million
tons in 1995; 5.2 million tons in 1994; 4.8 million tons in 1993; and 4.3
million tons in 1992. In 1996, sheet, strip and certain related semi-finished
products accounted for 83% of the total tonnage of steel mill products shipped
from the Indiana Harbor Works, and bar and certain related semi-finished
products accounted for 17%.
In 1996 and 1995, approximately 94% and 93%, respectively, of the shipments
of the Flat Products division and 92% and 93%, respectively, of the shipments
of the Bar division were to customers in 20 mid-American states. Approximately
74% of the shipments of the Flat Products division and 82% of the shipments of
the Bar division in 1996 were to customers in a five-state area comprised of
Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin, compared to 76% and 84% in
1995. Both divisions compete in these geographical areas, principally on the
basis of price, service and quality, with the nation's largest producers of
raw steel as well as with foreign producers and with many smaller domestic
mills.
The steel market is highly competitive with major integrated producers,
including the Company, facing competition from a variety of sources. Many
steel products compete with alternative materials such as plastics, aluminum,
ceramics, glass and concrete. Domestic steel producers have also been
adversely impacted by imports from foreign steel producers. Imports of steel
mill products accounted for 23.3% of the domestic market in 1996, up from
21.4% in 1995 but below the 1984 peak of 26.4%. Many foreign producers are
owned, controlled, or subsidized by their governments, allowing them to ship
steel products into the domestic market despite decreased profit margins or
losses on such sales.
Mini-mills provide significant competition in certain product lines,
primarily structural shapes, bars and rods. Mini-mills are relatively
efficient, low-cost producers that manufacture steel principally from scrap in
electric furnaces and, at this time, generally have lower capital, overhead,
employment and environmental costs than the integrated steel producers,
including the Company. Mini-mills have been adding capacity and expanding
their product lines in recent years to produce larger structural products and
certain flat-rolled products, including coated products. A significant
increase in modern mini-mill capacity is anticipated within the next two
years.
Certain facilities at the Indiana Harbor Works have been permanently closed
and others have been shut down for temporary periods. The 28-inch structural
mill was closed in early 1991, reflecting a decision to withdraw from the
structural steel markets. In late 1991 the mold foundry, No. 8 Coke Oven
Battery, and selected other facilities were closed either as part of a program
to permanently reduce costs through the closure of uneconomic facilities or
for environmental reasons. Provisions with respect to the shut-down of the
structural mill were taken in 1987. Provisions for estimated costs incurred in
connection with the closure of the mold foundry, No. 8 Coke Oven Battery, and
selected other facilities were made in 1991. Included in such provisions were
costs associated with the Company's closure of its No. 11 Coke Oven Battery in
June 1992. All remaining coke batteries were closed by year-end 1993, a year
earlier than previously anticipated. An additional provision was required with
respect to those closures. (See "Environment" below.) At year-end 1995 the
plate mill was closed. Provisions for such closure were taken prior to and in
1991.
For the five years indicated, shipments by market classification of steel
mill products produced by the Company at its Indiana Harbor Works, including
shipments to affiliates of the Company, are set forth below. As shown in the
table, a substantial portion of shipments by the Flat Products division was to
steel service centers and transportation-related markets. The Bar division
shipped more than 61% of its products to the steel converters/processors
market over the five-year period shown in the table.
2
PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL
TONNAGE
OF STEEL SHIPMENTS
----------------------------
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Steel Service Centers:
Affiliates...................................... 10% 9% 9% 9% 7%
Non-Affiliates.................................. 22 23 20 22 22
--- --- --- --- ---
32 32 29 31 29
Automotive........................................ 29 30 32 30 28
Steel Converters/Processors....................... 14 14 12 13 18
Appliance......................................... 9 8 9 9 9
Industrial, Electrical and Farm Machinery......... 8 7 8 7 8
Construction and Contractors' Products............ 2 2 2 3 3
Other............................................. 6 7 8 7 5
--- --- --- --- ---
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
=== === === === ===
Some value-added steel processing operations for which the Company does not
have facilities are performed by outside processors, including joint ventures,
prior to shipment of certain products to the Company's customers. In 1996,
approximately 44% of the products produced by the Company were processed
further through value-added services such as electrogalvanizing, painting and
slitting.
Approximately 73% of the total tonnage of shipments by the Company during
1996 from the Indiana Harbor Works was transported by truck, with the
remainder transported primarily by rail. A wholly owned truck transport
subsidiary of the Company was responsible for shipment of approximately 22% of
the total tonnage of products transported by truck from the Indiana Harbor
Works in 1996.
Substantially all of the steel mill products produced by the Flat Products
division are marketed through its own selling organization, with offices
located in Chicago; Southfield, Michigan; and Nashville, Tennessee.
Substantially all of the steel mill products produced by the Bar division are
marketed through its sales office in East Chicago, Indiana.
See "Product Classes" below for information relating to the percentage of
consolidated net sales accounted for by certain classes of similar products of
steel manufacturing operations.
Raw Materials
The Company obtains iron ore pellets primarily from three iron ore
properties, located in the United States and Canada, in which subsidiaries of
the Company have varying interests -- the Empire Mine in Michigan, the Minorca
Mine in Minnesota and the Wabush Mine in Labrador and Quebec, Canada. The
Company has entered into a contract to sell its interest in the Wabush mine.
Such sale is anticipated to take place in the first half of 1997. The Company
will purchase any ore requirements not met by its other sources from the
purchasers of the Wabush interest. The Company has also closed or terminated
certain less cost-efficient iron ore mining operations. See "Properties
Relating to Operations--Raw Materials Properties and Interests" in Item 2
below for further information relating to such iron ore properties.
The following table shows (1) the iron ore pellets available to the Company,
as of December 31, 1996, from properties of its subsidiaries and through
interests in raw materials ventures; (2) 1996 and 1995 iron ore pellet
production or purchases from such sources; and (3) the percentage of the
Company's iron ore requirements represented by production or purchases from
such sources in 1996 and 1995.
3
IRON ORE
TONNAGES IN THOUSANDS % OF
(GROSS TONS OF PELLETS) REQUIREMENTS (1)
--------------------------- -------------------
AVAILABLE AS OF PRODUCTION
DECEMBER 31, -----------
1996(2) 1996 1995 1996 1995
--------------- ----- ----- -------- --------
INLAND STEEL MINING COMPANY
PROPERTY
Minorca--Virginia, MN........ 60,000 2,735 2,769 38% 38%
IRON ORE VENTURES AND LONG-
TERM PURCHASE CONTRACTS
Empire (40% owned)--Palmer,
MI; Wabush (15.09% owned)--
Wabush, Labrador and Point
Noire, Quebec, Canada....... 108,000 4,034 3,961 55 55
------- ----- ----- -------- --------
Total Iron Ore........... 168,000 6,769 6,730 93% 93%
======= ===== ===== ======== ========
- --------
(1) Requirements in excess of production are purchased or taken from
stockpile.
(2) Net interest in proven reserves.
All of the Company's coal requirements are satisfied from independent
sources. In April 1996, the Company entered into a contract to purchase
1,000,000 tons of steam coal for the period of April 1, 1996 to December 31,
1997. The Company purchased 29% of its 1996 coal requirements under such
contract, representing 64% of its steam coal requirements. The balance of
steam coal requirements is being met through a short-term contract.
The Company's other coal requirements are for the PCI Associates joint
venture, in which a subsidiary of the Company holds a 50% interest. The PCI
facility pulverizes coal for injection into the Company's blast furnaces. In
1996, the Company entered into two contracts to satisfy its PCI coal
requirements. One covered 73% of 1996 PCI coal requirements while the other
covered the remaining 27%. Currently, the 1997 PCI facility's coal needs are
satisfied under one requirements contract subject to a force majeure
provision.
In December 1993, the last of the Company's coke-making facilities was
permanently shut down. The Company has entered into two long-term purchase
contracts, one of which requires the purchase of 1,400,000 tons of coke and
extends through July 1999 subject to force majeure provisions and may be
extended by mutual agreement of the parties. The second contract requires the
purchase of 350,000 tons of coke for the period January 1, 1996 through
December 31, 2000 on a take-or-pay basis, with a provision allowing the
Company to sell the coke to others. Both contract terms require purchases on
an annualized basis at prices negotiated annually based on certain market
determinants. During 1996, the Company satisfied 74% of its total coke needs
under such arrangements. The remainder of its purchased coke requirements was
obtained through contracts with independent domestic and foreign sources.
In November 1996, the Company reached an agreement with Sun Coal and Coke
Company ("Sun") and a unit of NIPSCO Industries, Inc. ("NIPSCO") for a heat
recovery coke battery and an associated energy recovery and flue-gas
desulphurization facility, to be located on land leased from the Company at
its Indiana Harbor Works. Sun will design, build, finance and operate the
coke-making portion of the project. A unit of NIPSCO Industries will design,
build, finance and operate the portion of the project which will clean the
coke plant's flue gas and convert the heat into steam and electricity. Sun,
the NIPSCO unit and other third parties will invest approximately $350 million
in the project, which is expected to commence operations in 1998. The Company
will also advance approximately $30 million during construction of the project
which will be credited against an energy tolling arrangement. The Company has
committed to purchase, for approximately 15 years, 1.2 million tons of coke
annually from the facility on a take-or-pay basis at prices determined by
certain cost factors, as well as energy produced by the facility through a
tolling arrangement.
The Company sold all of its limestone and dolomite properties in September
1990. The Company has entered into a long-term contract with the buyer of the
properties to purchase, subject to certain exceptions and at prices which
approximate market, the full amount of its annual limestone needs through
2002.
4
Approximately 62% of the iron ore pellets and virtually all of the limestone
received by the Company at its Indiana Harbor Works in 1996 were transported
by its Great Lakes carriers. Contracts are in effect for the transportation on
the Great Lakes of the remainder of its iron ore pellet requirements.
Approximately 25% of the Company's coal requirements were transported in its
hopper cars by unit train in 1996. The remainder of the Company's coal
requirements was transported in independent carrier-owned equipment or leased
equipment. Approximately 35% of the Company's coke requirements in 1996 were
transported in its own hopper cars, 45% in leased hopper cars, 10% in
independent carrier-owned hopper cars, and 10% in independent carrier-owned
river barges.
See "Energy" below for further information relating to the use of coal in
the operations of the Company.
PRODUCT CLASSES
The following table sets forth the percentage of consolidated net sales, for
the five years indicated, contributed by each class of similar products of the
Company that accounted for 10% or more of consolidated net sales in such time
period. The data includes sales to affiliates of the Company.
1996 1995 1994 1993 1992
---- ---- ---- ---- ----
Sheet and Strip....................................... 81% 82% 85% 88% 88%
Bar and Structural.................................... 19 18 15 12 12
--- --- --- --- ---
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
=== === === === ===
Sales to General Motors Corporation approximated less than 10% of
consolidated net sales in 1996, 10% in 1995, and 12% in each of 1994, 1993 and
1992. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of the consolidated net
sales of the Company during any of these years.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES AND INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES
In recent years, the Company and its subsidiaries have made substantial
capital expenditures, principally at the Indiana Harbor Works, to improve
quality and reduce costs, and for pollution control. Additions by the Company
and its subsidiaries to property, plant and equipment, together with
retirements and adjustments, for the five years ended December 31, 1996, are
set forth below. Net capital additions during such period aggregated $328.1
million.
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
---------------------------------------------
RETIREMENTS NET CAPITAL
ADDITIONS OR SALES ADJUSTMENTS ADDITIONS
--------- ----------- ----------- -----------
1996.............................. $155.8 $ 8.5 $5.6 $152.9
1995.............................. 113.9 36.7 1.5 78.7
1994.............................. 223.7 47.8 2.0 177.9
1993.............................. 86.1 140.2 (1.2) (55.3)
1992.............................. 54.4 73.0 (7.5) (26.1)
In recent years, the Company's largest capital improvement projects at the
Indiana Harbor Works have emphasized reducing costs and improving quality in
the steel-processing sequence of the Company. The Company and its subsidiaries
made capital expenditures of $156 million in 1996. Such expenditures
principally related to the purchase of new machinery and equipment to maintain
or improve operations at the Indiana Harbor Works.
In July 1987, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company formed a partnership,
I/N Tek, with an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of NSC to construct, own,
finance and operate a cold-rolling facility with an annual capacity of
1,500,000 tons, of which approximately 40% is cold-rolled substrate for I/N
Kote (described below). The I/N Tek facility, located near New Carlisle,
Indiana, achieved operation at its design capacity in 1992. The Company, which
owns, through its subsidiary, a 60% interest in the I/N Tek partnership is,
with certain limited
5
exceptions, the sole supplier of hot band to be processed by the I/N Tek
facility and generally has exclusive rights to the production capacity of the
facility.
In September 1989, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company formed a second
partnership, I/N Kote, with an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of NSC to
construct, own, finance and operate two sheet steel galvanizing lines adjacent
to the I/N Tek facility. The subsidiary of the Company owns a 50% interest in
I/N Kote. The I/N Kote facility consists of a hot-dip galvanizing line and an
electrogalvanizing line with a combined annual capacity of 900,000 tons. The
facility achieved operation at its design capacity in 1993. The Company has
guaranteed 50% of I/N Kote's permanent financing. I/N Kote has contracted to
acquire its cold-rolled steel substrate from the Company, which supplies the
substrate from the I/N Tek facility and the Company's Indiana Harbor Works.
Further information regarding the I/N Tek and I/N Kote joint venture
projects will be set forth under the caption "Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions--Joint Ventures" in Industries' definitive Proxy
Statement which will be furnished to stockholders of Industries in connection
with its Annual Meeting scheduled to be held on May 28, 1997.
The amount budgeted for 1997 capital expenditures by the Company and its
subsidiaries is approximately $100 million. It is anticipated that capital
expenditures will be funded from cash generated by operations and advances
from and capital contributions by Industries. (See "Environment" below for a
discussion of capital expenditures for pollution control purposes.)
EMPLOYEES
The monthly average number of active employees of the Company and its
subsidiaries receiving pay during 1996 was approximately 9,700. At year-end,
approximately 7,000 employees were represented by the United Steelworkers of
America, of whom approximately 650 were on furlough or indefinite layoff.
Total employment costs decreased from $679 million in 1995 to $649 million in
1996, as lower direct compensation expense, including profit sharing
provisions, was in part offset by higher employee benefit costs.
Beginning in 1991, the Company embarked upon a major turnaround strategy,
with the assistance of an outside consulting firm, to significantly reduce
costs, increase revenues and improve asset utilization at the Company. With
the closure of the plate operations at year-end 1995, the Company has
completed the workforce reduction program which was part of the turnaround
strategy, reducing employment by 25%.
The current labor agreement between the Company and the United Steelworkers
of America, effective August 1, 1993, covers wages and benefits through July
31, 1999. Among other things, the agreement provided a wage increase of $.50
per hour in 1995 and a $500 bonus in each of 1993 and 1994 (totalling in each
case approximately $4 million). All active employees received an additional
week of vacation in 1994 and in 1996. The agreement provided for a reopener on
wages and certain benefits in 1996 with an arbitration provision to resolve
unsettled issues, thereby precluding a work stoppage over the six-year term of
the contract. On September 17, 1996 an arbitrator issued a decision selecting
the Company's final offer of terms covering the second half of the six year
agreement. The terms provided a wage increase of $.50 per hour retroactive to
August 1, 1996 with increases of $.25 an hour in 1997 and 1998. A $1,000 lump
sum would be paid to active employees in each of the three remaining years of
the contract (totalling approximately $20 million). One additional holiday was
provided and retirement benefits were increased for active employees. The
agreement also provided for election of a union designee acceptable to
Industries' Board of Directors (Dr. Robert B. McKersie is such union
designee), restrictions on the ability of the Company to reduce the union
workforce (generally limited to attrition and major facilities shutdowns)
while allowing greater flexibility to institute work rule changes, quarterly
rather than annual payment of profit sharing amounts, significant improvements
in pension benefits for active employees, and the securing of retiree health
care obligations through certain trust and second mortgage arrangements.
"First dollar" health care coverage is eliminated under the agreement through
the institution of co-payments and increased deductibles on medical benefits.
6
ENVIRONMENT
The Company is subject to environmental laws and regulations concerning
emissions into the air, discharges into ground water and waterways, and the
generation, handling, labeling, storage, transportation, treatment and
disposal of waste material. These include various federal statutes regulating
the discharge or release of pollutants to the environment, including the Clean
Air Act, Clean Water Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act,
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980
("CERCLA," also known as "Superfund"), Safe Drinking Water Act, and Toxic
Substances Control Act, as well as state and local requirements. Violations of
these laws and regulations can give rise to a variety of civil,
administrative, and, in some cases, criminal actions and could also result in
substantial liabilities or require substantial capital expenditures. In
addition, under CERCLA the United States Environmental Protection Agency (the
"EPA") has authority to impose liability for site remediation on waste
generators, past and present site owners and operators, and transporters,
regardless of fault or the legality of the original disposal activity.
Liability under CERCLA is strict, joint and several.
On June 10, 1993, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Indiana entered a consent decree that resolved all matters raised by a lawsuit
filed by the EPA in 1990. The consent decree included a $3.5 million cash
fine, environmentally beneficial projects at the Indiana Harbor Works through
1997 costing approximately $7 million, and sediment remediation of portions of
the Indiana Harbor Ship Canal and Indiana Harbor Turning Basin estimated to
cost approximately $19 million over the next several years. The fine and
estimated remediation costs were provided for in 1991 and 1992. After payment
of the fine, the Company's reserve for environmental liabilities totalled $19
million. In 1995 such reserve was increased to $26 million, with the increase
primarily intended to cover the costs of assessing environmental contamination
discussed below. The consent decree also defines procedures for corrective
action at the Company's Indiana Harbor Works. The procedures defined establish
essentially a three-step process, each step of which requires agreement of the
EPA before progressing to the next step in the process, consisting of:
assessment of the site, evaluation of corrective measures for remediating the
site, and implementation of the remediation plan according to the agreed-upon
procedures. The Company is presently assessing the extent of environmental
contamination. The Company anticipates that this assessment will cost
approximately $2 million to $4 million over the next several years. Because
neither the nature and extent of the contamination nor the corrective actions
can be determined until the assessment of environmental contamination and
evaluation of corrective measures is completed, the Company cannot presently
reasonably estimate the costs of or the time required to complete such
corrective actions. Such corrective actions may, however, require significant
expenditures over the next several years that may be material to the financial
position and results of operations of the Company. Insurance coverage with
respect to such corrective actions is not significant.
By year-end 1993, the last of the Company's coke-making facilities was
permanently shut down. All coke battery closures were necessitated by the
inability of the facilities to meet environmental regulations and their
deteriorating condition and performance. The Company had anticipated keeping
such remaining coke-making facilities operational through year-end 1994. The
October 1993 decision to close these facilities early necessitated a fourth-
quarter 1993 pre-tax charge of $22.3 million that included the write-off of
property, plant and equipment costs which were to be depreciated in 1994 and
additional costs related to the earlier-than-anticipated displacement of
personnel. The Company has entered into two long-term contracts to satisfy the
majority of its coke needs. The Company has also reached an agreement with Sun
Coal and Coke Company and a unit of NIPSCO for a heat recovery coke battery.
(See "Raw Materials" above.) In addition, the Company participates in a joint
venture that has constructed and is operating a pulverized coal injection
facility for blast furnace application, reducing the Company's coke needs by
approximately 25%. The facility achieved operation at its design capacity in
1994.
Capital spending for pollution control projects totaled $19 million in each
of 1996 and 1995. Another $44 million was spent in 1996 to operate and
maintain such equipment, versus $39 million a year earlier. During the five
years ended December 31, 1996, the Company has spent $282 million to
construct, operate and maintain environmental control equipment at its various
locations.
7
Environmental projects previously authorized and presently under
consideration, including those designed to comply with the 1990 Clean Air Act
Amendments, but excluding any amounts that would be required under the consent
decree settling the 1990 EPA lawsuit, will require capital expenditures of
approximately $7 million in 1997. It is anticipated that the Company will make
annual capital expenditures of $5 million to $10 million in each of the four
years thereafter. In addition, the Company will have ongoing annual
expenditures of $35 million to $45 million for the operation of air and water
pollution control facilities to comply with current federal, state and local
laws and regulations. Due to the inability to predict the costs of corrective
action that may be required under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
and the consent decree in the 1990 EPA lawsuit, the Company cannot predict the
amount of additional environmental expenditures that will be required. Such
additional environmental expenditures, excluding amounts that may be required
in connection with the consent decree in the 1990 EPA lawsuit, however, are
not expected to be material to the financial position or results of operations
of the Company.
See Item 3 below for information concerning certain proceedings pertaining
to environmental matters in which the Company is involved.
ENERGY
Coal, together with coke, all of which are purchased from independent
sources, accounted for approximately 74% of the energy consumed by the Company
at the Indiana Harbor Works in 1996.
Natural gas and fuel oil supplied approximately 24% of the energy
requirements of the Indiana Harbor Works in 1996 and are used extensively by
the Company at other facilities that it owns or in which it has an interest.
Utilization of the pulverized coal injection facility (see "Environment"
above) has reduced natural gas and fuel oil consumption at the Indiana Harbor
Works.
The Company both purchases and generates electricity to satisfy electrical
energy requirements at the Indiana Harbor Works. In 1996, the Company produced
approximately 59% of its requirements at the Indiana Harbor Works. The
purchase of electricity at the Indiana Harbor Works is subject to curtailment
under rules of the local utility when necessary to maintain appropriate
service for various classes of its customers.
A subsidiary of NIPSCO has leased land at the Indiana Harbor Works and built
a 75 megawatt steam turbine on such land. Pursuant to a 15-year toll-charge
contract between the Company and the NIPSCO subsidiary, the turbine facility
generates electricity for use by the Company utilizing steam produced by
burning waste blast furnace gas. The facility became operational in the first
half of 1996 and it fulfills approximately 60% of the purchased electricity
requirements of the Indiana Harbor Works at prices below those currently
available to the Company from other sources.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
PROPERTIES RELATING TO OPERATIONS
Steel Production
All raw steel made by the Company is produced at its Indiana Harbor Works
located in East Chicago, Indiana. The property on which this plant is located,
consisting of approximately 1,900 acres, is held by the Company in fee. The
basic production facilities of the Company at its Indiana Harbor Works consist
of furnaces for making iron; basic oxygen and electric furnaces for making
steel; a continuous billet caster, a continuous combination slab/bloom caster
and two continuous slab casters; and a variety of rolling mills and processing
lines which turn out finished steel mill products. Certain of these production
facilities, including a continuous anneal line, are held by the Company under
leasing arrangements. The Company purchased the equity interest of the lessor
of the No. 2 BOF Shop Caster Facility in March 1994 and assumed caster-related
debt, which was repaid by year-end 1994. Substantially all of the remaining
property, plant and equipment at the Indiana Harbor Works, other than the
Caster Facility and leased equipment, is subject to the lien of the First
Mortgage of the
8
Company dated April 1, 1928, as amended and supplemented. See "Operations--Raw
Steel Production and Mill Shipments" in Item 1 above for further information
relating to capacity and utilization of the Company's properties. The
Company's properties are adequate to serve its present and anticipated needs,
taking into account those issues discussed in "Capital Expenditures and
Investments in Joint Ventures" in Item 1 above.
I/N Tek, a partnership in which a subsidiary of the Company owns a 60%
interest, has constructed a 1,500,000-ton annual capacity cold-rolling mill on
approximately 200 acres of land, which it owns in fee, located near New
Carlisle, Indiana. Substantially all the property, plant and equipment owned
by I/N Tek is subject to a lien securing related indebtedness. The I/N Tek
facility is adequate to serve the present and anticipated needs of the Company
planned for such facility.
I/N Kote, a partnership in which a subsidiary of the Company owns a 50%
interest, has constructed a 900,000-ton annual capacity steel galvanizing
facility on approximately 25 acres of land, which it owns in fee, located
adjacent to the I/N Tek site. Substantially all the property, plant and
equipment owned by I/N Kote is subject to a lien securing related
indebtedness. The I/N Kote facility is adequate to serve the present and
anticipated needs of the Company planned for such facility.
PCI Associates, a partnership in which a subsidiary of the Company owns a
50% interest, has constructed a pulverized coal injection facility on land
located within the Indiana Harbor Works. The Company leases PCI Associates the
land upon which the facility is located. Substantially all the property, plant
and equipment owned by PCI Associates is subject to a lien securing related
indebtedness. The PCI Associates facility is adequate to serve the present and
anticipated needs of the Company planned for such facility.
The Company owns two vessels and leases one vessel for the transportation of
iron ore and limestone on the Great Lakes, and a subsidiary of the Company
owns a fleet of 404 coal hopper cars (100-ton capacity each) used in unit
trains to move coal and coke to the Indiana Harbor Works. See "Operations--Raw
Materials" in Item 1 above for further information relating to utilization of
the Company's transportation equipment. Such equipment is adequate, when
combined with purchases of transportation services from independent sources,
to meet the Company's present and anticipated transportation needs.
The Company also owns and maintains research and development laboratories in
East Chicago, Indiana, which facilities are adequate to serve its present and
anticipated needs.
Raw Materials Properties and Interests
Certain information relating to raw materials properties and interests of
the Company and its subsidiaries is set forth below. See "Operations--Raw
Materials" in Item 1 above for further information relating to capacity and
utilization of such properties and interests.
Iron Ore
The operating iron ore properties of the Company's subsidiaries and of the
iron ore ventures in which the Company has an interest are as follows:
ANNUAL
PRODUCTION CAPACITY
(IN THOUSANDS OF
GROSS TONS OF
PROPERTY LOCATION PELLETS)
-------- -------- -------------------
Empire Mine............... Palmer, Michigan 8,100
Minorca Mine.............. Virginia, Minnesota 2,700
Wabush Mine............... Wabush, Labrador and Pointe 5,700
Noire, Quebec, Canada
The Empire Mine is operated by the Empire Iron Mining Partnership, in which
the Company has a 40% interest. The Company, through a subsidiary, is the sole
owner and operator of the Minorca Mine. The Wabush Mine is a taconite project
in which the Company owns an approximately 15% interest. The Company has
entered into a contract to sell its interest in the Wabush mine. Such sale is
anticipated to take place in the first half of 1997. The Company also owns a
38% interest in the Butler Taconite project (permanently closed in 1985) in
Nashwauk, Minnesota.
9
The reserves at the Empire Mine, the Minorca Mine and the Wabush Mine are
held under leases expiring, or expected at current production rates to expire,
between 2012 and 2040. Substantially all of the reserves at Butler Taconite
are held under leases. The Company's share of the production capacity of its
interests in such iron ore properties is sufficient to provide the majority of
its present and anticipated iron ore pellet requirements. Any remaining
requirements have been and are expected to continue to be readily available
from independent sources. During 1992, the Minorca Mine's original ore body
was depleted and production shifted to a new major iron ore body, the
Laurentian Reserve, acquired by lease in 1990.
Coal
The Company's sole remaining coal property, the Lancashire No. 25 Property,
located near Barnesboro, Pennsylvania, is permanently closed. All Company coal
requirements for the past several years have been and are expected to continue
to be met through contract purchases and other purchases from independent
sources.
OTHER PROPERTIES
The Company and certain of its subsidiaries lease, under a long-term
arrangement, approximately 15% of the space in the Inland Steel Building
located at 30 West Monroe Street, Chicago, Illinois (where the Company's
principal executive offices are located), which property interest is adequate
to serve the Company's present and anticipated needs.
Certain subsidiaries of the Company hold in fee at various locations an
aggregate of approximately 355 acres of land, all of which is for sale. The
Company also holds in fee approximately 300 acres of land adjacent to the I/N
Tek and I/N Kote sites, which land is available for future development.
Approximately 1,060 acres of rural land, which are held in fee at various
locations in the north-central United States by various raw materials
ventures, are also for sale. In April 1996, the Company's subsidiary, Inland
Steel Mortgage Acceptance Corporation, sold the combination office building
and warehouse in Hoffman Estates (IL) which was formerly owned by I R
Construction Products Company, Inc. (the Company's former construction
products business).
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
On June 10, 1993, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Indiana entered a consent decree that resolved all matters raised by the
lawsuit filed by the EPA in 1990. The consent decree includes a $3.5 million
cash fine, environmentally beneficial projects at the Indiana Harbor Works
through 1997 costing approximately $7 million, and sediment remediation of
portions of the Indiana Harbor Ship Canal and Indiana Harbor Turning Basin
estimated to cost approximately $19 million over the next several years. The
fine and estimated remediation costs were provided for in 1991 and 1992. After
payment of the fine, the Company's reserve for environmental liabilities
totalled $19 million. In 1995 such reserve was increased to $26 million, with
the increase primarily intended to cover the costs of assessing environmental
contamination discussed below. The consent decree also defines procedures for
corrective action at the Company's Indiana Harbor Works. The procedures
defined establish essentially a three-step process, each step of which
requires agreement of the EPA before progressing to the next step in the
process, consisting of: assessment of the site, evaluation of corrective
measures for remediating the site, and implementation of the remediation plan
according to the agreed-upon procedures. The Company is presently assessing
the extent of environmental contamination. The Company anticipates that this
assessment will cost approximately $2 million to $4 million over the next
several years. Because neither the nature and extent of the contamination nor
the corrective actions can be determined until the assessment of environmental
contamination and evaluation of corrective measures is completed, the Company
cannot presently reasonably estimate the costs of or the time required to
complete such corrective actions. Such corrective actions may, however,
require significant expenditures over the next several years that may be
material to the financial position and results of operations of the Company.
Insurance coverage with respect to such corrective actions is not significant.
10
On March 22, 1985, the EPA issued an administrative order to the Company's
former Inland Steel Container Company Division ("Division") naming the former
Division and various other unrelated companies as responsible parties under
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
("CERCLA") in connection with the cleanup of a waste disposal facility
operated by Duane Marine Salvage Corporation at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. The
administrative order alleged that certain of the former Division's wastes were
transported to, and disposed of at, that facility and required the Company to
join with other named parties in taking certain actions relating to the
facility. The Company and the other administrative order recipients have
completed the work required by the order. In unrelated matters, the EPA also
advised the former Division and various other unrelated parties of other sites
located in New Jersey at which the EPA expects to spend public funds on any
investigative and corrective measures that may be necessary to control any
releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances, pollutants and
contaminants pursuant to the applicable provisions of CERCLA. The notice also
indicated that the EPA believes the Company may be a responsible party under
CERCLA. The extent of the Company's involvement and participation in these
matters has not yet been determined. While it is not possible at this time to
predict the amount of the Company's potential liability, none of these matters
is expected to materially affect the Company's financial position. Results of
operations could be materially affected for the particular reporting periods
in which expenses are incurred.
On March 29, 1996, the EPA filed a lawsuit against the Company in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Indiana for alleged violations of
effluent limits contained in its National Pollution Discharge Elimination
Systems ("NPDES") permit and for the alleged discharge of pollutants without
the authorization of an NPDES permit. While it is not possible at this time to
predict the amount of the Company's potential liability, this matter is not
expected to materially affect the Company's financial position. Results of
operations could be materially affected for the particular reporting periods
in which expenses are incurred.
The EPA has adopted a national policy of seeking substantial civil penalties
against owners and operators of sources for noncompliance with air and water
pollution control statutes and regulations under certain circumstances. It is
not possible to predict whether further proceedings will be instituted against
the Company or any of its subsidiaries pursuant to such policy, nor is it
possible to predict the amount of any such penalties that might be assessed in
any such proceeding.
The Company received a Special Notice of Potential Liability ("Special
Notice") from Indiana Department of Environmental Management ("IDEM") on
February 18, 1992 relating to the Four County Landfill Site, Fulton County,
Indiana (the "Facility"). The Special Notice stated that IDEM has documented
the release of hazardous substances, pollutants and contaminants at the
Facility and was planning to spend public funds to undertake an investigation
and control the release or threatened release at the Facility unless IDEM
determined that a potentially responsible party ("PRP") will properly and
promptly perform such action. The Special Notice further stated that the
Company may be a PRP and that the Company, as a PRP, may have potential
liability with respect to the Facility. In August 1993, the Company, along
with other PRPs, entered into an Agreed Order with IDEM pursuant to which the
PRPs agreed to perform a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study ("RI/FS")
for the Facility and pay certain past and future IDEM costs. In addition, the
PRPs agreed to provide funds for operation and maintenance necessary for
stabilization of the Facility. The costs which the Company has agreed to
assume under the Agreed Order are not currently anticipated to exceed
$250,000. The cost of the final remedies which will be determined to be
required with respect to the Facility cannot be reasonably estimated until, at
a minimum, the RI/FS is completed. The Company is therefore unable to
determine the extent of its potential liability, if any, relating to the
Facility or whether this matter could materially affect the Company's
financial position or results of operations.
In October 1996, the Company received a notification from IDEM, as lead
administrative trustee, that the natural resource trustees (which also include
the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, the U.S. Department of the
Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Park Service) intend to
perform a natural resource damage assessment on the Grand Calumet River and
Indiana Harbor Canal system. The notification further states that the Company
has been identified as a PRP in connection with the release of hazardous
substances and oil
11
and the subsequent damages resulting from natural resource injury. Because of
the preliminary nature of this matter, it is not possible at this time to
predict the amount of the Company's potential liability or whether such
potential liability could materially affect the Company's financial position.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
The Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction J(1)(a)
and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore omitting, pursuant to General
Instruction J(2), the information called for by this Item.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON STOCK AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Inland Steel Industries, Inc.
thus, market, stockholder and dividend information otherwise called for by
this Item is omitted.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
The Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction J(2)(a)
and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore omitting, pursuant to General
Instruction J(2), the information called for by this Item.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S NARRATIVE ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
The Company reported a net loss of $17.9 million in 1996 as compared with
net income of $69.1 million in 1995. Included in the 1996 loss was an
extraordinary after-tax loss of approximately $8.8 million, $13.6 million
before income taxes, as a result of the following two redemptions. During the
1996 third quarter, the Company made a tender offer for the repurchase of the
entire $125 million principal amount of its Series T First Mortgage Bonds
outstanding, of which $98.7 million was tendered. The Company also refinanced
$38 million of 10 percent pollution control bonds with bonds bearing a rate of
7.25 percent.
The following table summarizes selected earnings and other data:
1996 1995
-------- --------
DOLLARS AND TONS
IN MILLIONS
Net sales.............................................. $2,397.3 $2,513.3
Operating profit....................................... 48.0 181.7
Net income (loss)...................................... (17.9) 69.1
Net tons shipped....................................... 5.1 5.1
The Company reported $48 million of operating profit in 1996 compared with
an operating profit of $182 million in 1995. Net sales decreased 5 percent in
1996 as compared with 1995 due primarily to a 5 percent decrease in average
selling price. This decline in average selling price was the primary factor in
the fall-off of operating profit in 1996. The volume of steel mill products
shipped was unchanged from 1995 to 1996. Also contributing to the operating
profit decline was a $26.3 million workforce reduction provision in 1996 that
will ultimately reduce salaried employment by approximately 450.
The Company continued to effect improvements in operations during 1996. The
Company had its safest year in history both in terms of the lowest number of
injuries and lost time due to injury. At the same time, improvements were also
produced in the shipment of prime products, product mix, raw steel tons
produced, capability utilization, raw steel to prime product yield and
productivity. The combined effect of these and other improvements resulted in
both a lower level of purchased steel and a slight reduction in operating cost
per ton. The Company operated at 92 percent of its raw steelmaking capability
in 1996, compared with 90 percent in 1995.
12
The Company, under the I/N Kote partnership agreement, supplies all of the
steel for the joint venture and, with certain limited exceptions, is required
to set the price of that steel to assure that I/N Kote's expenditures do not
exceed its revenues. Since 1993, the Company's sales prices exceeded its costs
of production but were less than the market prices for cold rolled steel
products. Because I/N Kote expenditures include principal payments and a
provision for return on equity to the partners, the Company's ability to
realize higher prices on its sales to I/N Kote depends on the facility
continuing near-capacity operations and obtaining appropriate pricing for its
products.
In the 1996 fourth quarter, the Company reached an agreement with Sun Coal
and Coke Company and a unit of NIPSCO Industries for a heat recovery coke
battery and an associated energy recovery and flue-gas desulphurization
facility, to be located on land leased from the Company at its Indiana Harbor
Works. Sun will design, build, finance and operate the cokemaking portion of
the project. A unit of NIPSCO Industries will design, build, finance and
operate the portion of the project which will clean the coke plant's flue gas
and convert the heat into steam and electricity. Sun, the NIPSCO unit and
other third parties will invest approximately $350 million in the project. The
Company has committed to purchase, for approximately 15 years, 1.2 million
tons of coke annually from the facility on a take-or-pay basis, as well as
energy produced by the facility through a tolling arrangement. The facility is
designed to be the primary coke source for the largest blast furnace at the
Indiana Harbor Works. It is anticipated that the per ton cost of coke supplied
by the facility will be less than that paid by the Company in 1996. The
Company will also advance approximately $30 million during construction of the
project which will be credited against the energy tolling arrangement.
In 1996, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-
Based Compensation." As allowed by the statement, the Company elected to
continue to account for stock options using the intrinsic value method
prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and to provide
disclosure of the proforma effects of applying the new fair value method in
the notes to financial statements. (See Note 5 to the consolidated financial
statements for further details.) Accordingly, the adoption of this statement
had no impact on the results of operations or financial position of the
Company.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The consolidated financial statements (including the financial statement
schedules listed under Item 14(a)1 of this report) of the Company called for
by this Item, together with the Report of Independent Accountants dated
February 19, 1997, are set forth on pages F-2 to F-19 inclusive, of this
Report on Form 10-K, and are hereby incorporated by reference into this Item.
Financial statement schedules not included in this Report on Form 10-K have
been omitted because they are not applicable or because the information called
for is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
Consolidated quarterly sales and earnings information for 1996 and 1995 is
set forth in Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (contained
herein), which is hereby incorporated by reference into this Item.
ITEM 9. DISAGREEMENTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction J(1)(a)
and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore omitting, pursuant to General
Instruction J(2), the information called for by this Item.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction J(1)(a)
and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore omitting, pursuant to General
Instruction J(2), the information called for by this Item.
13
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction J(1)(a)
and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore omitting, pursuant to General
Instruction J(2), the information called for by this Item.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
The Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction J(1)(a)
and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore omitting, pursuant to General
Instruction J(2), the information called for by this Item.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(A)DOCUMENTS FILED AS A PART OF THIS REPORT.
1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. The consolidated financial
statements listed below are set forth on pages F-2 to F-19 inclusive,
of this Report and are incorporated by reference in Item 8 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Report of Independent Accountants.
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Reinvested Earnings for
the three years ended December 31, 1996.
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three years ended
December 31, 1996.
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1996 and 1995.
Schedules to Consolidated Financial Statements at December 31, 1996
and 1995, relating to:
Property, Plant and Equipment.
Long-Term Debt.
Statement of Accounting and Financial Policies.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Financial Statement Schedule II (Reserves) for the three years ended
December 31, 1996.
2. EXHIBITS. The exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of
Regulation S-K are listed under the caption "Exhibits" below.
(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
No reports on Form 8-K were filed by the Company during the quarter
ended December 31, 1996.
(C) EXHIBITS.
3.(i) Copy of Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of the Company. (Filed as
Exhibit 3-A to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1992, and incorporated by reference herein.)
3.(ii) Copy of By-laws, as amended, of the Company. (Filed as Exhibit 3.(ii) to the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994,
and incorporated by reference herein.)
4.A Copy of First Mortgage Indenture, dated April 1, 1928, between the Company
(the "Steel Company") and First Trust and Savings Bank and Melvin A.
Traylor, as Trustees, and of
14
supplemental indentures thereto, to and including the Thirty-Fifth
Supplemental Indenture, incorporated by reference from the following
Exhibits: (i) Exhibits B-1(a), B-1(b), B-1(c), B-1(d) and B-1(e), filed with
Steel Company's Registration Statement on Form A-2 (No. 2-1855); (ii)
Exhibits D-1(f) and D-1(g), filed with Steel Company's Registration
Statement on Form E-1 (No. 2-2182); (iii) Exhibit B-1(h), filed with Steel
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 18, 1937; (iv) Exhibit B-
1(i), filed with Steel Company's Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February
8, 1937; (v) Exhibits B-1(j) and B-1(k), filed with Steel Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K for the month of April, 1940; (vi) Exhibit B-2, filed
with Steel Company's Registration Statement on Form A-2 (No. 2-4357); (vii)
Exhibit B-1(l), filed with Steel Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for
the month of January, 1945; (viii) Exhibit 1, filed with Steel Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of November, 1946; (ix) Exhibit 1,
filed with Steel Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for the months of July
and August, 1948; (x) Exhibits B and C, filed with Steel Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K for the month of March, 1952; (xi) Exhibit A, filed with
Steel Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of July, 1956;
(xii) Exhibit A, filed with Steel Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for
the month of July, 1957; (xiii) Exhibit B, filed with Steel Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of January, 1959; (xiv) the Exhibit
filed with Steel Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of
December, 1967; (xv) the Exhibit filed with Steel Company's Current Report
on Form 8-K for the month of April, 1969; (xvi) the Exhibit filed with Steel
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of July, 1970; (xvii) the
Exhibit filed with the amendment on Form 8 to Steel Company's Current Report
on Form 8-K for the month of April, 1974; (xviii) Exhibit B, filed with
Steel Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of September, 1975;
(xix) Exhibit B, filed with Steel Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for
the month of January, 1977; (xx) Exhibit C, filed with Steel Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of February, 1977; (xxi) Exhibit B,
filed with Steel Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1978; (xxii) Exhibit B, filed with Steel Company's Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1980; (xxiii) Exhibit 4-
D, filed with Steel Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1980; (xxiv) Exhibit 4-D, filed with Steel Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1982;
(xxv) Exhibit 4-E, filed with Steel Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 1983; (xxvi) Exhibit 4(i) filed with the
Steel Company's Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 33-43393); (xxvii)
Exhibit 4 filed with Steel Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated June
23, 1993; (xxviii) Exhibit 4.C filed with Steel Company's Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1995; (xxix) Exhibit 4.C filed
with Steel Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 1995; and (xxx) Exhibit 4.C filed with Steel Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1996.
4.B Copy of consolidated reprint of First Mortgage Indenture, dated April 1,
1928, between the Company and First Trust and Savings Bank and Melvin A.
Traylor, as Trustees, as amended and supplemented by all supplemental
indentures thereto, to and including the Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture.
(Filed as Exhibit 4-E to Form S-1 Registration Statement No. 2-9443, and
incorporated by reference herein.)
24 Powers of attorney.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
15
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Inland Steel Company
Robert J. Darnall
Date: March 27, 1997 By: _________________________________
Robert J. Darnall
Chairman
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company
and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
--------- ----- ----
Robert J. Darnall Chairman and Director March 27, 1997
____________________________________
Robert J. Darnall
Cynthia C. Heath Vice President--Finance March 27, 1997
____________________________________ and Purchasing, Principal
Cynthia C. Heath Financial Officer and
Controller
A. Robert Abboud Director
James W. Cozad Director
James A. Henderson Director
Robert B. McKersie Director
Leo F. Mullin Director By:George A. Ranney, Jr.
-----------------------
George A. Ranney, Jr.
Attorney-in-fact
March 27, 1997
Donald S. Perkins Director
Jean-Pierre Rosso Director
Joshua I. Smith Director
Nancy H. Teeters Director
Arnold R. Weber Director
16
INDEX
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
OF
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.)
ITEM PAGE
---- ----
Report of Independent Accountants......................................... F-2
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Reinvested Earnings for the
three years ended December 31, 1996...................................... F-3
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three years ended December
31, 1996................................................................. F-4
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 1996 and 1995.................. F-5
Schedules to Consolidated Financial Statements at December 31, 1996 and
1995, relating to Property, Plant and Equipment, and Long-Term Debt...... F-6
Statement of Accounting and Financial Policies............................ F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................ F-9
Financial Statement Schedule II (Reserves) for the three years ended
December 31, 1996........................................................ F-19
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of
Inland Steel Company
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in the index
appearing on page F-1 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Inland Steel Company (a wholly owned subsidiary of Inland Steel
Industries, Inc.) and Subsidiary Companies at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the company's management; our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our
audits of these statements in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management,
and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for the opinion expressed above.
Price Waterhouse LLP
Chicago, Illinois
February 19, 1997
F-2
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND REINVESTED EARNINGS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31
--------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
-------- -------- ---------
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Net sales.................................. $2,397.3 $2,513.3 $ 2,487.9
-------- -------- ---------
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of goods sold (excluding
depreciation)........................... 2,105.3 2,112.9 2,127.6
Selling, general and administrative
expenses................................ 42.3 42.9 43.4
Depreciation............................. 124.6 121.2 117.4
State, local and miscellaneous taxes..... 50.8 54.6 50.2
Workforce reduction provision (Note 7)... 26.3 -- --
-------- -------- ---------
Total.................................. 2,349.3 2,331.6 2,338.6
-------- -------- ---------
Operating profit........................... 48.0 181.7 149.3
Other expense:
General corporate expense, net of income
items................................... 12.4 17.8 6.8
Interest and other expense on debt....... 48.2 52.6 53.3
-------- -------- ---------
Income (loss) before income taxes and
extraordinary loss........................ (12.6) 111.3 89.2
Provision for income taxes (Note 9)........ 3.5 Cr. 42.2 35.3
-------- -------- ---------
Income (loss) before extraordinary loss.... (9.1) 69.1 53.9
Extraordinary loss on early retirement of
debt...................................... (8.8) -- --
-------- -------- ---------
Net income (loss)...................... $ (17.9) $ 69.1 $ 53.9
======== ======== =========
Cr. = Credit
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF REINVESTED EARNINGS
Accumulated deficit at beginning of year... $ (949.5) $ (992.7) $(1,020.8)
Net income (loss) for the year............. (17.9) 69.1 53.9
Impact of pension plan split (Note 8)...... 9.5 -- --
Preferred dividends declared............... (25.8) (25.9) (25.8)
-------- -------- ---------
Accumulated deficit at end of year......... $ (983.7) $ (949.5) $ (992.7)
======== ======== =========
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN
CASH YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31
-------------------------
1996 1995 1994
------- ------- -------
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)................................. $ (17.9) $ 69.1 $ 53.9
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net
cash provided from operating activities:
Depreciation.................................... 124.6 121.2 117.4
Deferred employee benefit cost.................. 18.1 (109.4) 45.9
Deferred income taxes........................... 19.3 72.7 52.5
Workforce reduction provision................... 26.3 -- --
Raw material joint venture costs................ (3.8) (6.6) (4.3)
Change in:
Receivables................................... 15.7 33.1 (44.2)
Inventories................................... 16.6 (41.7) (57.3)
Accounts payable.............................. (5.7) (18.1) 33.7
Payables to related companies (other)......... (.4) (3.6) (1.1)
Accrued salaries and wages.................... (11.7) (3.3) 10.1
Other accrued liabilities..................... (22.7) 26.7 (17.5)
Other items..................................... (36.9) (20.2) (30.1)
------- ------- -------
Net adjustments............................... 139.4 50.8 105.1
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided from operating activities... 121.5 119.9 159.0
------- ------- -------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures.............................. (155.8) (113.9) (160.3)
Investments in and advances to joint ventures,
net.............................................. 23.4 26.5 23.7
Proceeds from sales of assets..................... 3.9 1.7 2.6
------- ------- -------
Net cash used for investing activities........ (128.5) (85.7) (134.0)
------- ------- -------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Additional paid-in capital--Inland Steel
Industries....................................... -- -- 110.0
Long-term debt issued............................. 42.2 16.8 19.7
Long-term debt retired............................ (144.5) (23.5) (219.9)
Change in notes payable to related companies...... 135.1 (1.6) 91.0
Dividends paid.................................... (25.8) (25.9) (25.8)
------- ------- -------
Net cash provided from (used for) financing
activities................................... 7.0 (34.2) (25.0)
------- ------- -------
Net change in cash and cash equivalents........... -- -- --
Cash and cash equivalents--beginning of year...... -- -- --
------- ------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents--end of year............ $ -- $ -- $ --
======= ======= =======
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Cash paid (received) during the year for:
Interest (net of amount capitalized)............ $ 47.3 $ 50.7 $ 54.4
Income taxes, net............................... (30.3) (30.4) (14.5)
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Long-term debt acquired in purchase of assets... -- -- 63.3
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
AT DECEMBER 31
------------------
1996 1995
-------- --------
DOLLARS IN
MILLIONS
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents................................ $ -- $ --
Receivables less provision for allowances, claims and
doubtful accounts of $17.9 and $24.3, respectively...... 225.6 241.3
Inventories (Note 1)..................................... 182.0 198.6
Deferred income taxes (Note 9)........................... 18.6 29.9
-------- --------
Total current assets................................... 426.2 469.8
Investments in and advances to joint ventures.............. 221.4 214.3
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, less accumulated
depreciation
(see details page F-6).................................... 1,368.7 1,332.8
Prepaid pension costs...................................... 58.5 44.2
Deferred income taxes (Note 9)............................. 248.4 261.5
Deferred charges and other assets.......................... 19.6 21.9
-------- --------
Total assets......................................... $2,342.8 $2,344.5
======== ========
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable......................................... $ 217.7 $ 223.4
Payables to related companies:
Notes.................................................. 272.5 137.4
Other.................................................. 3.9 4.3
Accrued liabilities:
Salaries, wages and commissions........................ 52.7 64.4
Taxes.................................................. 69.2 72.4
Interest on debt....................................... 5.3 6.5
Terminated facilities costs and other (Note 7)......... 15.3 30.7
Long-term debt due within one year....................... 7.7 7.7
-------- --------
Total current liabilities............................ 644.3 546.8
Long-term debt (see details page F-6 and Note 3)........... 307.9 409.4
Allowance for terminated facilities costs and other (Note
7)........................................................ 40.9 44.8
Deferred employee benefits (Note 8)........................ 1,130.1 1,089.0
Deferred income and other.................................. 8.8 9.5
-------- --------
Total liabilities.................................... 2,132.0 2,099.5
-------- --------
STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
Preferred stock, $1.00 par value, 500 shares authorized for
all series, 110 shares issued and oustanding, aggregate
liquidation value $238.2 (Note 4)......................... -- --
Common stock, 2,000 shares, $1.00 par value, authorized,
980 shares issued and outstanding......................... -- --
Additional paid-in capital................................. 1,194.5 1,194.5
Accumulated deficit........................................ (983.7) (949.5)
-------- --------
Total stockholder's equity........................... 210.8 245.0
-------- --------
Total liabilities and stockholder's equity........... $2,342.8 $2,344.5
======== ========
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.)
SCHEDULES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AT DECEMBER 31
-----------------
1996 1995
-------- --------
DOLLARS IN
MILLIONS
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
Land, land improvements and mineral properties............. $ 123.6 $ 122.9
Buildings, machinery and equipment......................... 3,713.7 3,568.3
Transportation equipment................................... 137.4 130.6
Property under capital leases--primarily machinery and
equipment................................................. 36.7 36.7
-------- --------
Total.................................................. 4,011.4 3,858.5
Less--
Accumulated depreciation................................... 2,506.8 2,391.7
Accumulated depreciation--capital leases................... 35.2 33.3
Allowance for retirements and terminated facilities........ 100.7 100.7
-------- --------
Net.................................................... $1,368.7 $1,332.8
======== ========
LONG-TERM DEBT:
First Mortgage Bonds:
Series R, 7.9% due January 15, 2007...................... $ 72.0 $ 72.5
Series T, 12% due December 1, 1998....................... 26.3 125.0
Pollution Control Series 1977, 5 3/4% due February 1,
2007.................................................... 26.5 26.5
Pollution Control Series 1978, 6 1/2% due May 15, 2008... 52.0 52.0
Pollution Control Series 1993, 6.8% due June 1, 2013..... 40.0 40.0
Pollution Control Series 1995, 6.85% due December 1,
2012.................................................... 17.0 17.0
-------- --------
Total First Mortgage Bonds............................. 233.8 333.0
Obligations for Industrial Development Revenue Bonds:
Pollution Control Project No. 3, 6 1/4% due April 1,
1999.................................................... 6.0 8.0
Pollution Control Project No. 9, 10% due November 1,
2011.................................................... -- 38.0
Pollution Control Project No. 11, 7 1/8% due June 1,
2007.................................................... 20.0 20.0
Pollution Control Project No. 13, 7 1/4% due November 1,
2011.................................................... 38.0 --
Pollution Control Project No. 14, 6.7% due November 1,
2012.................................................... 5.1 --
Obligations under capital leases including Pollution
Control Projects No. 1 and
No. 2 primarily at rates ranging from 5.9% to 12.6%, due
through
August 1, 1998.......................................... 5.0 10.4
-------- --------
Total long-term debt................................... $ 307.9 $ 409.4
======== ========
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.)
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL POLICIES
The following briefly describes the Company's principal accounting and
financial policies.
ACCOUNTING FOR EQUITY INVESTMENTS
The Company's investments in less than majority-owned companies, joint
ventures and partnerships, and the Company's majority interest in the I/N Tek
partnership, are accounted for under the equity method.
INVENTORY VALUATION
Inventories are valued at cost which is not in excess of market. Cost is
determined by the last-in, first-out method except for supply inventories,
which are determined by the average cost or first-in, first-out methods.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment is depreciated for financial reporting
purposes over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Steelmaking machinery
and equipment, a significant class of assets, is depreciated on a production-
variable method, which adjusts straight-line depreciation to reflect
production levels at the steel plant. The adjustment is limited to not more
than a 25% increase or decrease from straight-line depreciation. Blast furnace
relining expenditures are capitalized and amortized on a unit-of-production
method over the life of the lining. All other assets are depreciated on a
straight-line method.
Expenditures for normal repairs and maintenance are charged to income as
incurred.
Gains or losses from significant abnormal disposals or retirements of
properties are credited or charged to income. The cost of other retired assets
less any sales proceeds is charged to accumulated depreciation.
BENEFITS FOR RETIRED EMPLOYEES
Pension benefits are provided by the Company to substantially all employees
under a trusteed non-contributory plan of Inland Steel Industries, Inc. Life
insurance and certain medical benefits are provided for retired employees.
The estimated costs of pension, medical, and life insurance benefits are
determined annually by consulting actuaries. The cost of these benefits for
retirees is being accrued during their term of employment. Pensions are funded
in accordance with ERISA requirements in a trust established under the plan.
Costs for retired employee medical benefits are funded when claims are
submitted.
CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash equivalents reflected in the Statement of Cash Flows are highly liquid,
short-term investments with maturities of three months or less. Cash
management activities are performed by the Company's parent, Inland Steel
Industries, Inc. ("Industries"), and periodic cash transfers are made, thereby
minimizing the level of cash maintained by the Company.
STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Statement No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation," encourages, but does not require companies to
record compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair
value. The Company, which participates in Industries' stock compensation
F-7
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL POLICIES--(CONTINUED)
plans, has chosen to continue to account for stock-based compensation using
the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion
No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and related
Interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured
as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of Industries' stock at the
date of the grant over the amount an employee must pay to acquire the stock.
Compensation cost for stock appreciation rights and performance equity units
is recorded annually based on the quoted market price of Industries' stock at
the end of the period.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and related notes to financial statements. Changes in such
estimates may affect amounts reported in future periods.
F-8
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1/INVENTORIES
Inventories were classified on December 31 as follows:
DECEMBER 31
-------------
1996 1995
------ ------
DOLLARS IN
MILLIONS
In process and finished steel.............................. $106.5 $124.5
------ ------
Raw materials and supplies:
Iron ore................................................. 42.4 39.7
Scrap and other raw materials............................ 16.4 18.3
Supplies................................................. 16.7 16.1
------ ------
75.5 74.1
------ ------
Total.................................................. $182.0 $198.6
====== ======
Replacement costs for the LIFO inventories exceeded LIFO values by
approximately $279 million and $260 million on December 31, 1996 and 1995,
respectively. The effect on cost of goods sold of LIFO liquidations in each of
the three years ended December 31, 1996 was not material.
NOTE 2/BORROWING ARRANGEMENTS
Inland Steel Administrative Service Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of
the Company established to provide a supplemental source of short-term funds
to the Company, has a $125 million revolving credit facility with a group of
banks which extends to November 30, 2000. Under this arrangement the Company
has agreed to sell substantially all of its receivables to Inland Steel
Administrative Service Company to secure this facility. The facility requires
the maintenance of various financial ratios including minimum net worth and
leverage ratios.
NOTE 3/LONG-TERM DEBT
The outstanding First Mortgage Bonds of Inland Steel Company are the
obligation solely of the Company and have not been guaranteed or assumed by,
or otherwise become the obligation of Industries or any of its other
subsidiaries. Each series of First Mortgage Bonds issued by the Company is
limited to the principal amount outstanding, with the Pollution Control Series
1977 Bonds, the Pollution Control Series 1978 Bonds, and the Series R First
Mortgage Bonds subject to a sinking fund. A substantial portion of the
property, plant and equipment owned by the Company at its Indiana Harbor Works
is subject to the lien of the First Mortgage. This property had a net book
value of approximately $1.0 billion on December 31, 1996.
During 1996, the Company tendered for the repurchase of all outstanding
Series T 12% First Mortgage Bonds. Of the $125 million principal amount of
Series T Bonds outstanding, $98.7 million was tendered. The Company also
called $38 million of 10% Pollution Control Project No. 9 Bonds for early
redemption, which were refinanced at an interest rate of 7.25%. As a result of
the tenders and early redemption, the Company recognized an extraordinary
after-tax loss of $8.8 million, $13.6 million before income taxes.
During the third quarter of 1995, the Company refinanced $17 million of
10.75% pollution control revenue bonds with bonds bearing an interest rate of
6.85%. In addition, in the 1994 second quarter, the Company refinanced $20
million of pollution control revenue bonds at an interest rate of 7.125%.
F-9
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
In 1994, the Company redeemed all $75 million of its outstanding Series O,
P, and Q First Mortgage Bonds. The Company also acquired the equity interest
in the operating lease of the No. 2 Basic Oxygen Furnace Shop continuous
casters, assuming $63 million of debt. By year-end 1994, the assumed debt and
approximately $40 million of other caster-related debt was repaid by the
Company.
The amended and supplemented Mortgage under which the First Mortgage 12%
Bonds, Series T, were issued contained covenants limiting, among other things,
the creation of additional indebtedness; the declaration and payment of
dividends and distributions on the Company's capital stock; and the
acquisition or retirement of any debt of the Company that is subordinate to
the Series T Bonds. In connection with the tender offer related to the above
issuance, the Company received consents from a majority of the holders to
amend the indenture to eliminate all material restrictions resulting from the
previous covenants, thus increasing financial flexibility.
Maturities of long-term debt and capitalized lease obligations due within
five years are: $7.7 million in 1997, $40.6 million in 1998, $10.8 million in
1999, $7.8 million in 2000, and $7.8 million in 2001. See Note 12 regarding
commitments and contingencies for other scheduled payments.
Interest cost incurred by the Company totaled $50.7 million in 1996, and
$54.4 million in each of 1995 and 1994. Included in these totals is
capitalized interest of $2.5 million in 1996, $1.8 million in 1995, and $1.1
million in 1994.
NOTE 4/CAPITAL STOCK
Cash dividends on Series A Preferred Stock, 10 shares issued and
outstanding, are cumulative and payable quarterly at an annual rate of $72,000
per share. The shares are convertible into common stock at the rate of one
share of common stock for each preferred share, and have a liquidation value
of $1,320,000 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividend. The shares are
redeemable, at the Company's option, for $1,320,000 per share plus any accrued
and unpaid dividends.
Cash dividends on Series B Preferred Stock, 50 shares issued and
outstanding, are cumulative and payable quarterly at an annual rate of
$142,500 per share. The shares are convertible into common stock at a
conversion price of $1,128,750 per share, or 1.33 common shares for each
preferred share, and have a liquidation value of $1,500,000 per share plus any
accrued and unpaid dividends. The shares are redeemable at the Company's
option, for $1,500,000 per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends.
Cash dividends on Series C Preferred Stock, 50 shares issued and
outstanding, are cumulative and payable quarterly at an annual rate of
$360,000 per share. The shares have a liquidation value of $3,000,000 per
share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. The shares are redeemable at the
Company's option at a price (plus accrued and unpaid dividends) declining from
$3,270,000 for the one-year period commencing December 1, 1996 to $3,000,000
beginning December 1, 2011. The Series C Preferred Stock is also exchangeable
at the Company's option on any dividend payment date for the Company's 12%
subordinated debentures due December 1, 2016, at a rate of $3,000,000
principal amount of debentures for each share of Series C Preferred Stock.
NOTE 5/STOCK OPTION PLANS
The Company has adopted the disclosure-only provisions of FASB Statement No.
123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation." Accordingly, no compensation
cost has been recognized for the stock option plans. Had compensation cost for
the option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for
awards
F-10
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
in 1996 and 1995 consistent with the provisions of FASB Statement No. 123, the
Company's net income would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts
indicated below:
1996 1995
------ -----
DOLLARS IN
MILLIONS
Net income (loss)--as reported............................. $(17.9) $69.1
Net income (loss)--pro forma............................... (20.0) 68.5
The fair value of each option grant of Industries stock is estimated on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following
weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 1996: dividend yield of 1.08%;
expected volatility of 31.82%; risk-free interest rate of 6.15%; and expected
term of 5 years.
Company employees participate in the Industries employee stock purchase plan
where employees have the opportunity to sign up twice a year to purchase stock
at the end of each six month period at a price that is 90 percent of the fair
market value price on the last day of the period. In each of 1996 and 1995,
Company employees received Industries stock with a total value that was
approximately $90,000 greater than the price paid for the stock issued.
NOTE 6/DERIVATIVES AND FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value
of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate
that value.
Derivatives
The Company has only limited involvement with derivative financial
instruments, none of which are used for trading purposes. Derivatives are used
to hedge exposure to fluctuations in costs caused by the price volatility of
certain metal commodities and natural gas supplies, and in foreign currency
exchange rates related to firm commitments regarding a Canadian raw material
joint venture. Gains and losses associated with these hedging transactions
become part of the cost of the item being hedged. At no time during 1996, 1995
or 1994 were such hedging transactions material.
Long-term debt
The estimated fair value of the Company's long-term debt (including current
portions thereof), using quoted market prices of Company debt securities
recently traded and market-based prices of similar securities for those
securities not recently traded, was $322 million at December 31, 1996 and $433
million at December 31, 1995 as compared with the carrying value of $316
million and $417 million included in the balance sheet at year-end 1996 and
1995, respectively.
NOTE 7/PROVISIONS FOR RESTRUCTURING
At year-end 1996, the Company recorded a charge of $26 million for
provisions related to pensions, health care, and severance costs resulting
from a salaried workforce reduction plan to affect approximately 450 people, a
majority of whom were displaced in the first quarter of 1997.
In the 1995 third quarter, the Company recorded a charge of $35 million for
provisions related to pensions, health care, and severance costs resulting
from the acceptance by approximately 300 salaried Company employees of a
voluntary retirement package offered during the quarter. In addition, the
Company announced the closure of its plate operation. Provisions for pensions
and other employee benefits related to the shutdown of this operation had been
previously accrued.
F-11
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
With the closure of the plate operation, the Company completed the workforce
reduction program announced in 1991. A final computation of the employee
benefit costs required for the 1991 program resulted in unused reserves due to
differences between the actual makeup of the population leaving the Company
under this program and the projections used in 1991. The Company, therefore,
reversed $65 million of unused reserves from the balance sheet and recorded a
corresponding credit to income.
During the 1995 third quarter, the Company also increased reserves by $7
million for additional benefit costs at a closed iron ore mining facility and
by $2 million for a further writedown of non-operating assets of the former
construction business. Reserves relating to environmental matters were
increased by $7 million.
The Company has taken initiatives to reduce its production costs by shutdown
of certain Indiana Harbor Works facilities and raw materials operations.
Reserve balances related to provisions for these shutdowns, which include
long-term liabilities for mine reclamation costs and employee benefits,
totaled $131.6 million, $135.9 million and $133.8 million at December 31,
1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
NOTE 8/RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Pensions
The Inland Steel Industries Pension Plan and Pension Trust, which covers
certain employees of the Company, also covers certain employees of Industries
and of certain of Industries' other subsidiaries. The plan is a non-
contributory defined benefit plan with pensions based on final pay and years
of service for all salaried employees and certain wage employees, and years of
service and a fixed rate (in most instances based on frozen pay or on job
class) for all other wage employees, including members of the United
Steelworkers of America. Because the fair value of pension plan assets
pertains to all participants in the plan, no separate determination of the
fair value of such assets is made solely with respect to the Company.
Effective April 30, 1996, that portion of the Industries pension plan
covering current and former employees of Ryerson Tull, Inc., a majority owned
subsidiary of Industries, was separated and became the Ryerson Tull Pension
Plan. Due to this separation, Industries remeasured each subsidiary's benefit
obligation using plan data and actuarial assumptions as of the date of
separation. An amount of assets proportional to the liabilities assumed by the
Ryerson Tull Pension Plan was allocated to such plan.
The funded status of the Industries pension plan (excluding Ryerson Tull,
Inc.) as of September 30, 1996 and the Industries consolidated plan as of
September 30, 1995 were as follows:
SEPTEMBER 30
--------------
1996 1995
------ ------
DOLLARS IN
MILLIONS
Fair value of plan assets...................................... $1,729 $1,919
------ ------
Actuarial present value of benefits for service rendered to
date:
Accumulated Benefit Obligation based on compensation to date. 1,746 1,956
Additional benefits based on estimated future compensation
levels...................................................... 105 90
------ ------
Projected Benefit Obligation................................. 1,851 2,046
------ ------
Plan assets shortfall to Projected Benefit Obligation.......... $ (122) $ (127)
====== ======
In 1996 and 1995, Industries recorded an additional minimum pension
liability of $76.3 million and $102.6 million, respectively, representing the
excess of the unfunded Accumulated Benefit Obligation over previously accrued
pension costs. A corresponding intangible asset was recorded as an offset to
this additional liability as prescribed.
F-12
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The calculation of benefit obligations was based on a discount (settlement)
rate of 8.0% in 1996 and 7.75% in 1995; a rate of compensation increase of
4.0% in both 1996 and 1995; and a rate of return on plan assets of 9.5% in
both 1996 and 1995.
Pension cost for the Company for 1996, 1995 and 1994 was $4.1 million, $9.3
million and $25.2 million, respectively. In 1995, the Company paid $86.0
million to Industries for its share of a contribution to the Industries
Pension Trust.
Benefits Other Than Pension
Substantially all of the Company's employees are covered under
postretirement life insurance and medical benefit plans that involve
deductible and co-insurance requirements. The postretirement life insurance
benefit formula used in the determination of postretirement benefit cost is
primarily based on applicable annual earnings at retirement for salaried
employees and specific amounts for hourly employees. The Company does not
prefund any of these postretirement benefits. Effective January 1, 1994, a
Voluntary Employee Benefit Association Trust was established for payment of
health care benefits made to United Steelworkers of America retirees. Funding
of the Trust is made as claims are submitted for payment.
The amount of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for 1996, 1995 and
1994 is composed of the following:
1996 1995 1994
---- ---- ----
DOLLARS IN
MILLIONS
Service cost............................................. $ 10 $ 9 $12
Interest cost............................................ 66 68 64
Net amortization and deferral............................ (11) (20) (5)
---- ---- ---
Total net periodic postretirement benefit cost....... $ 65 $ 57 $71
==== ==== ===
The following table sets forth components of the accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation:
SEPTEMBER 30
-------------
1996 1995
------ ------
DOLLARS IN
MILLIONS
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation attributable to:
Retirees....................................................... $ 479 $ 499
Fully eligible plan participants............................... 77 142
Other active plan participants................................. 236 212
------ ------
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.................... 792 853
Unrecognized net gain.......................................... 255 179
Unrecognized prior service credit.............................. 42 47
------ ------
Accrued postretirement benefit obligation........................ 1,089 1,079
Expense, net of benefits provided, October through December...... 8 2
Workforce reduction provision.................................... 4 --
------ ------
Accrued postretirement benefit obligations at December 31........ $1,101 $1,081
====== ======
Any net gain or loss in excess of 10 percent of the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation is amortized over the remaining service
period of active plan participants.
F-13
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The assumptions used to determine the plan's accumulated postretirement
benefit obligation are as follows:
SEPTEMBER
30
----------
1996 1995
---- ----
Discount rate................................................. 8.0% 7.75%
Rate of compensation increase................................. 4.0% 4.0%
Medical cost trend rate....................................... 4.5% 4.5%
Year ultimate rate reached.................................... 1996 1996
A one percentage point increase in the assumed health care cost trend rates
for each future year increases annual net periodic postretirement benefit cost
and the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation as of September 30, 1996
by $18 million and $102 million, respectively.
NOTE 9/INCOME TAXES
The Company participates in a tax-sharing agreement under which current and
deferred income tax provisions are determined for each company in the
Industries group on a stand-alone basis. Any current liability is paid to
Industries. If the Company is unable to use all of its allocated tax
attributes (net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards) in a given year
but other companies in the consolidated group are able to utilize them, then
the Company will be paid for the use of its attributes. NOL and tax credit
carryforwards are allocated to each company in accordance with applicable tax
regulations as if a company were to leave the consolidated group. Companies
with taxable losses record current income tax credits not to exceed current
income tax charges recorded by profitable companies. If Industries uses NOL
carryforwards, the Company will use the appropriate portion of that year's
carryforward previously allocated to it, if any.
A state tax sharing agreement, similar to the federal agreement, also exists
with Industries for those states in which the consolidated group is charged
state taxes on a unitary or combined basis.
The elements of the provisions for income taxes for each of the three years
indicated below were as follows:
YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31
-----------------------
1996 1995 1994
----- ----- -----
DOLLARS IN
MILLIONS
Current income taxes:
Federal........................................... $27.8Cr. $30.7Cr. $17.5Cr.
State and foreign................................. .2 .1 .3
----- ----- -----
27.6Cr. 30.6Cr. 17.2Cr.
Deferred income taxes............................... 24.1 72.8 52.5
----- ----- -----
Total tax expense or benefit.................... $ 3.5Cr. $42.2 $35.3
===== ===== =====
- --------
Cr. = Credit
F-14
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The components of the deferred income tax assets and liabilities arising
under FASB Statement No. 109 were as follows:
DECEMBER
31
----------
1996 1995
---- ----
DOLLARS
IN
MILLIONS
Deferred tax assets (excluding postretirement benefits other
than pensions):
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards............ $282 $280
Restructuring and termination reserves..................... 24 26
Other deductible temporary differences..................... 81 89
Less: Valuation allowances................................. (3) (2)
---- ----
384 393
---- ----
Deferred tax liabilities:
Fixed asset basis difference............................... 442 438
Other taxable temporary differences........................ 64 51
---- ----
506 489
---- ----
Net deferred liability excluding postretirement benefits
other than pensions..................................... (122) (96)
FASB Statement No. 106 impact (postretirement benefits other
than pensions).............................................. 389 387
---- ----
Net deferred asset....................................... $267 $291
==== ====
For tax purposes, the Company had available, at December 31, 1996, net
operating loss ("NOL") carryforwards for regular federal income tax purposes
of approximately $729 million which will expire as follows: $58 million in
2005, $288 million in 2006, $265 million in 2007, $109 million in 2008, $6
million in 2009 and $3 million in 2011. The Company also had investment tax
credit and other general business credit carryforwards for tax purposes of
approximately $9 million, which expire during the years 1997 through 2006. A
valuation allowance of $3 million has been established for those tax credits
which are not expected to be realized. Additionally, in conjunction with the
Alternative Minimum Tax ("AMT") rules, the Company had available AMT credit
carryforwards for tax purposes of approximately $18 million, which may be used
indefinitely to reduce regular federal income taxes.
The Company believes that it is more likely than not that all of the NOL
carryforwards will be utilized prior to their expiration. This belief is based
upon the factors discussed below.
The NOL carryforwards and existing deductible temporary differences
(excluding those relating to FASB Statement No. 106) are substantially offset
by existing taxable temporary differences reversing within the carryforward
period. Furthermore, any such recorded tax benefits which would not be so
offset are expected to be realized by continuing to achieve future profitable
operations.
Subsequent to the adoption of FASB Statement No. 109, the Company adopted
FASB Statement No. 106 and recognized the entire transition obligation at
January 1, 1992 as a cumulative effect charge in 1992. At December 31, 1996,
the deferred tax asset related to the Company's FASB Statement No. 106
obligation was $389 million. To the extent that future annual charges under
FASB Statement No. 106 continue to exceed deductible amounts, this deferred
tax asset will continue to grow. Thereafter, even if the Company should have a
tax loss in any year in which the deductible amount would exceed the financial
statement expense, the tax law provides for a 15-year carryforward period of
that loss. Because of the extremely long period that is available to realize
these future tax benefits, a valuation allowance for this deferred tax asset
is not necessary.
F-15
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
The Industries group operates in a highly cyclical industry and consequently
has had a history of generating and then fully utilizing significant amounts
of NOL carryforwards. During the years 1986 through 1989, the Industries group
utilized approximately $600 million of NOL carryforwards and in 1995 utilized
$137 million of NOL carryforwards.
Total income taxes reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Operations
differ from the amounts computed by applying the federal corporate tax rate as
follows:
YEARS ENDED
DECEMBER 31
----------------------
1996 1995 1994
---- ----- -----
DOLLARS IN
MILLIONS
Federal income tax expense or benefit computed at
statutory tax rate of 35%........................... $4.4Cr. $38.9 $31.2
Additional taxes or credits from:
State and local income taxes, net of federal income
tax effect........................................ 1.3 5.3 4.5
Percentage depletion............................... 2.8Cr. 2.9Cr. 2.8Cr.
All other, net..................................... 2.4 .9 2.4
---- ----- -----
Total income tax expense or benefit.............. $3.5Cr. $42.2 $35.3
==== ===== =====
- --------
Cr. = Credit
NOTE 10/I/N TEK AND I/N KOTE JOINT VENTURES
I/N Tek, a general partnership formed for a joint venture between the
Company and Nippon Steel Corporation ("NSC"), owns and operates a cold-rolling
facility. I/N Tek is 60% owned by a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and
40% owned by an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of NSC. The Company has
exclusive rights to the productive capacity of the facility, except in certain
limited circumstances, and, under a tolling arrangement with I/N Tek, has an
obligation to use the facility for the production of cold rolled steel. Under
the tolling arrangement, the Company was charged $144.8 million, $147.5
million and $131.1 million in 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively, for such
tolling services.
The Company and NSC also own and operate another joint venture which
consists of a 400,000 ton electrogalvanizing line and a 500,000 ton hot-dip
galvanizing line adjacent to the I/N Tek facility. I/N Kote, the general
partnership formed for this joint venture, is owned 50% by a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company and 50% by an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of
NSC. The Company and NSC each have guaranteed the share of long-term financing
attributable to their respective subsidiary's interest in the partnership. I/N
Kote had $416 million outstanding under its long-term financing agreement at
December 31, 1996. I/N Kote is required to buy all of its cold rolled steel
from the Company, which is required to furnish such cold rolled steel at a
price that results in an annual return on equity to the partners of I/N Kote,
depending upon operating levels, of up to 10% after operating and financing
costs; this price may be subject to an adjustment if the Company's return on
sales differs from I/N Kote's return on sales. Purchases of Company cold
rolled steel by I/N Kote aggregated $314.9 million in 1996, $303.7 million in
1995 and $275.6 million in 1994. At year-end 1996 and 1995, I/N Kote owed the
Company $18.4 million and $4.8 million, respectively, related to these
purchases. Prices of cold rolled steel sold by the Company to I/N Kote are
determined pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreement and are based,
in part, on operating costs of the partnership. In 1996 and 1995, the Company
sold cold rolled steel to I/N Kote at prices that exceeded the Company's
production costs but were less than the market prices for cold rolled steel
products. I/N Kote also provides tolling services to the Company for which it
was charged $24.5 million in 1996, $32.6 million in 1995 and $36.0 million in
1994. The Company sells all I/N Kote products that are distributed in North
America.
F-16
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
NOTE 11/INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES
The Company's investments in unconsolidated joint ventures accounted for by
the equity method consist primarily of its 60% interest in I/N Tek, 50%
interest in I/N Kote, 50% interest in PCI Associates, 40% interest in the
Empire Iron Mining Partnership, 15% interest (13 3/4% interest in 1994) in
Wabush Mines and 12 1/2% interest in Walbridge Electrogalvanizing Company. I/N
Tek and I/N Kote are joint ventures with NSC (see Note 10). The Company does
not exercise control over I/N Tek, as all significant management decisions of
the joint venture require agreement by both of the partners. Due to this lack
of control by the Company, the Company accounts for its investment in I/N Tek
under the equity method. PCI Associates is a joint venture which operates a
pulverized coal injection facility at the Indiana Harbor Works. Empire and
Wabush are iron ore mining and pelletizing ventures owned in various
percentages primarily by U.S. and Canadian steel companies. Walbridge is a
venture that coats cold-rolled steel in which Inland has the right to 25% of
the productive capacity. Following is a summary of combined financial
information of the Company's unconsolidated joint ventures:
1996 1995 1994
-------- -------- --------
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
Results of Operations for the Year Ended December
31:
Gross revenue.................................... $1,207.7 $1,183.1 $1,098.3
Costs and expenses............................... 1,131.7 1,100.8 1,070.2
-------- -------- --------
Net income....................................... $ 76.0 $ 82.3 $ 28.1
======== ======== ========
Financial Position at December 31:
Current assets................................... $ 264.0 $ 269.1 $ 265.2
Total assets..................................... 1,789.7 1,838.5 1,868.3
Current liabilities.............................. 229.2 253.5 246.5
Total liabilities................................ 1,401.2 1,457.9 1,499.9
Net assets....................................... 388.5 380.6 368.4
NOTE 12/COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
At year-end 1996, the Company guaranteed $22.3 million of long-term debt
attributable to a subsidiary's interest in PCI Associates.
As part of the agreement covering the 1990 sale of the Inland Lime & Stone
Company division assets, the Company agreed, subject to certain exceptions, to
purchase, at prices which approximate market, the full amount of its annual
limestone needs or one million gross tons, whichever is greater, through 1996,
and the annual limestone needs of the Indiana Harbor Works from 1997 through
2002.
The Company and its subsidiaries have various operating leases for which
future minimum lease payments are estimated to total $100.7 million through
2021, including approximately $21.3 million in 1997, $16.0 million in 1998,
$12.0 million in 1999, $10.1 million in 2000, and $9.1 million in 2001.
It is anticipated that the Company will make capital expenditures of $5
million to $10 million annually in each of the next five years for the
construction, and have ongoing annual expenditures of $35 million to $45
million for the operation, of air and water pollution control facilities to
comply with current federal, state and local laws and regulations. The Company
is involved in various environmental and other administrative or judicial
actions initiated by governmental agencies. While it is not possible to
predict the results of these matters, the Company does not expect
environmental expenditures, excluding amounts that may be required in
connection with the consent decree in the 1990 EPA lawsuit, to materially
affect the Company's results of operations or financial position. Corrective
actions relating to the EPA consent decree may require significant
expenditures over the next several years that may be material to the results
of operations or financial position of the Company.
F-17
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS--(CONTINUED)
At December 31, 1996, the Company's reserves for environmental liabilities
totaled $24 million, $19 million of which related to the sediment remediation
under the 1993 EPA consent decree.
The total amount of firm commitments of the Company and its subsidiaries to
contractors and suppliers, primarily in connection with additions to property,
plant and equipment, approximated $34 million at year-end 1996.
NOTE 13/RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Industries has established procedures for charging its administrative
expenses to the operating companies owned by it. These charges are for
management, financial and legal services provided to those companies. Charges
from Industries for 1996, 1995 and 1994 totaled $16.4 million, $17.6 million
and $18.6 million, respectively.
There are also established procedures to charge interest on all intercompany
loans within the Industries group of companies. Such loans currently bear
interest at the prime rate. For 1996, 1995 and 1994, the Company's net
interest expense to companies within the Industries group totaled $17.6
million, $14.4 million and $7.7 million, respectively.
The Company sells to and purchases products from related companies at
prevailing market prices. These transactions for the indicated years, except
those with I/N Kote (see Note 10), are summarized as follows:
1996 1995 1994
------ ------ ------
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
Net product sales.................................... $204.3 $196.5 $183.4
Net product purchases................................ 19.0 19.9 18.7
NOTE 14/CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
The Company produces and sells a wide range of steels, of which
approximately 99% consists of carbon and high-strength low-alloy steel grades.
Approximately 76% of the sales were to customers in five mid-American states,
and 94% were to customers in 20 mid-American states. Over half the sales are
to the steel service center and transportation (including automotive) markets.
Sales to General Motors Corporation approximated 10% of consolidated net
sales in 1995 and 12% in 1994. No other customer, except I/N Kote (see Note
10), accounted for more than 10% of the consolidated net sales of the Company
during any of the three years ended December 31, 1996.
NOTE 15/CONSOLIDATED QUARTERLY SALES AND EARNINGS (UNAUDITED)
1996
-----------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER*
------------------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Net sales................................ $615.7 $604.9 $574.9 $601.8
Gross profit............................. 23.4 23.6 38.2 8.9
Net loss................................. (2.1) (2.7) (3.0) (10.1)
1995
-----------------------------------
FIRST SECOND THIRD FOURTH
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
------------------- ------- ------- ------- --------
Net sales................................ $651.7 $685.4 $574.3 $601.9
Gross profit............................. 62.5 81.9 51.5 34.0
Net income............................... 21.2 33.4 10.4 4.1
- --------
*Includes $26.3 million workforce reduction provision, $17.1 million after
tax.
F-18
INLAND STEEL COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
(A WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF INLAND STEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.)
SCHEDULE II--RESERVES
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
DOLLARS IN MILLIONS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PROVISIONS FOR ALLOWANCES,
CLAIMS AND DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
------------------------------------------
YEARS
ENDED BALANCE AT ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS BALANCE AT
DECEMBER BEGINNING CHARGED FROM END OF
31 OF YEAR TO INCOME RESERVES YEAR
- -------- ---------- --------- ---------- ----------
1996................................ $24.3 $ 1.1 $6.4(A) $17.9
$1.1(B)
1995................................ $19.3 $10.6 $5.6(A) $24.3
1994................................ $22.9 $ 4.4 $6.3(A) $19.3
$1.7(B)
- --------
NOTES:
(A) Allowances granted during year.
(B) Bad debts written off during year.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
F-19
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT SEQUENTIAL
NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
------- ----------- ----------
3.(i) Copy of Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, of
the Company. (Filed as Exhibit 3-A to the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1992, and incorporated by reference herein.) --
3.(ii) Copy of By-Laws, as amended, of the Company. (Filed as
Exhibit 3.(ii) to the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-Q for the year ended December 31, 1994, and
incorporated by reference herein.) --
4.A Copy of First Mortgage Indenture, dated April 1, 1928,
between the Company (the "Steel Company") and First
Trust and Savings Bank and Melvin A. Traylor, as
Trustees, and of supplemental indentures thereto, to
and including the Thirty-Fifth Supplemental Indenture,
incorporated by reference from the following Exhibits:
(i) Exhibits B-1(a), B-1(b), B-1(c), B-1(d) and B-1(e),
filed with Steel Company's Registration Statement on
Form A-2 (No.
2-1855); (ii) Exhibits D-1(f) and D-1(g), filed with
Steel Company's Registration Statement on Form E-1 (No.
2-2182); (iii) Exhibit B-1(h), filed with Steel
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 18,
1937; (iv) Exhibit B-1(i), filed with Steel Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K, dated February 8, 1937; (v)
Exhibits B-1(j) and B-1(k), filed with Steel Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of April,
1940; (vi) Exhibit B-2, filed with Steel Company's
Registration Statement on Form A-2 (No. 2-4357); (vii)
Exhibit B-1(l), filed with Steel Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K for the month of January, 1945;
(viii) Exhibit 1, filed with Steel Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K for the month of November, 1946;
(ix) Exhibit 1, filed with Steel Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K for the months of July and August,
1948; (x) Exhibits B and C, filed with Steel Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of March,
1952; (xi) Exhibit A, filed with Steel Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of July, 1956;
(xii) Exhibit A, filed with Steel Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K for the month of July, 1957; (xiii)
Exhibit B, filed with Steel Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K for the month of January, 1959; (xiv) the
Exhibit filed with Steel Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K for the month of December, 1967; (xv) the
Exhibit filed with Steel Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K for the month of April, 1969; (xvi) the
Exhibit filed with Steel Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K for the month of July, 1970; (xvii) the
Exhibit filed with the amendment on Form 8 to Steel
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of
April, 1974; (xviii) Exhibit B, filed with Steel
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of
September, 1975; (xix) Exhibit B, filed with Steel
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of
January, 1977; (xx) Exhibit C, filed with Steel
Company's Current Report on Form 8-K for the month of
February, 1977; (xxi) Exhibit B, filed with Steel
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1978; (xxii) Exhibit B, filed with Steel
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1980; (xxiii) Exhibit 4-D, filed with
Steel Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1980; (xxiv) Exhibit 4-
D, filed with Steel Company's Annual Report on Form 10-
K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1982; (xxv)
Exhibit 4-E, filed with Steel Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
1983; (xxvi) Exhibit 4(i) filed with the Steel
Company's Registration Statement on Form S-2 (No. 33-
43393); (xxvii) Exhibit 4 filed with Steel Company's
Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 23, 1993;
(xxviii) Exhibit 4.C filed with Steel Company's
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 1995; (xxix) Exhibit 4.C filed with Steel
Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 1995; and (xxx) Exhibit 4.C filed
with Steel Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 1996. --
i
EXHIBIT SEQUENTIAL
NUMBER DESCRIPTION PAGE NO.
------- ----------- ----------
4.B Copy of consolidated reprint of First Mortgage
Indenture, dated April 1, 1928, between the Company and
First Trust and Savings Bank and Melvin A. Traylor, as
Trustees, as amended and supplemented by all
supplemental indentures thereto, to and including the
Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture. (Filed as Exhibit 4-
E to Form S-1 Registration Statement No. 2-9443, and
incorporated by reference herein.) --
24 Powers of attorney.....................................
27 Financial Data Schedules...............................
ii