Back to GetFilings.com
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FORM 10-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
(MARK
ONE)
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
COMMISSION REGISTRANT; STATE OF INCORPORATION; IRS EMPLOYER
FILE NUMBER ADDRESS; AND TELEPHONE NUMBER IDENTIFICATION NO.
----------- ----------------------------------- ------------------
1-11375 UNICOM CORPORATION 36-3961038
(an Illinois corporation)
37th Floor, 10 South Dearborn Street
Post Office Box A-3005
Chicago, Illinois 60690-3005
312/394-7399
1-1839 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY 36-0938600
(an Illinois corporation)
37th Floor, 10 South Dearborn Street
Post Office Box 767
Chicago, Illinois 60690-0767
312/394-4321
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:
TITLE OF EACH CLASS NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
- --------------------------- ON WHICH REGISTERED
-------------------------
UNICOM CORPORATION
Common Stock, without par value New York, Chicago and Pacific
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
(Listed on inside cover)
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANTS (1) HAVE FILED ALL REPORTS
REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS, AND (2) HAVE BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS.
YES X . No .
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrants' knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of
the Act:
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE
TITLE OF EACH CLASS ON WHICH REGISTERED
- --------------------------------------- ---------------------------
First Mortgage Bonds:
7 5/8% Series 25, due June 1,
2003
8% Series 26, due October 15, New York
2003
8 1/8% Series 35, due January 15,
2007
Sinking Fund Debentures:
3%, due April 1, 1999
2 7/8%, due April 1, 2001 New York
7 5/8% Series 1, due February 15,
2003
2 3/4%, due April 1, 1999 New York and Chicago
Cumulative Preference Stock, without par value:
$1.90; $2.00; $7.24; $8.40; $8.38; and $8.40 Series B
New York, Chicago and
Pacific
$2.425 New York
8.48% ComEd-Obligated Mandatorily
Redeemable Preferred Securities of
Subsidiary Trust
New York
THE ESTIMATED AGGREGATE MARKET VALUE OF UNICOM CORPORATION'S 216,108,691
shares of outstanding Common Stock, without par value, was approximately
$4,800,000,000 as of February 28, 1997. In excess of 99.9% of Unicom
Corporation's voting stock was owned by non-affiliates as of that date.
THE ESTIMATED AGGREGATE MARKET VALUE OF COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY'S
outstanding $1.425 Convertible Preferred Stock, Cumulative Preference Stock
and Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Securities of
Subsidiary Trusts was approximately $970,000,000 as of February 28, 1997.
Unicom Corporation held in excess of 99.99% of the 214,218,990 shares of
outstanding Common Stock, $12.50 par value, of Commonwealth Edison Company as
of that date.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of Unicom Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January
31, 1997 are incorporated by reference into Parts I, II and IV of the Unicom
Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K and portions of its definitive Proxy
Statement to be filed prior to April 30, 1997 relating to its Annual Meeting
of shareholders to be held on May 29, 1997 are incorporated by reference into
Part III of the Unicom Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Portions of Commonwealth Edison Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated
January 31, 1997 are incorporated by reference into Parts I, II and IV of the
Commonwealth Edison Company Annual Report on Form 10-K and portions of its
definitive Information Statement to be filed prior to April 30, 1997 relating
to its Annual Meeting of shareholders to be held on May 29, 1997 are
incorporated by reference into Part III of the Commonwealth Edison Company
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
UNICOM CORPORATION
AND
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
This document contains the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1996 for each of Unicom Corporation and Commonwealth Edison
Company. Information contained herein relating to an individual registrant is
filed by such registrant on its own behalf. Accordingly, except for its
subsidiaries, Commonwealth Edison Company makes no representation as to
information relating to Unicom Corporation or to any other companies affiliated
with Unicom Corporation.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
----
Definitions............................................................... 1
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR UNICOM CORPORATION:
Part I
Item 1. Business........................................................ 2
General............................................................... 2
Changes in the Electric Utility Industry.............................. 3
Net Electric Generating Capability.................................... 6
Construction Program.................................................. 6
Rate Matters.......................................................... 9
Fuel Supply........................................................... 10
Regulation............................................................ 11
Employees............................................................. 18
Interconnections...................................................... 18
Franchises............................................................ 18
Executive Officers of the Registrant.................................. 19
Operating Statistics.................................................. 20
Forward Looking Information........................................... 21
Item 2. Properties...................................................... 21
Item 3. Legal Proceedings............................................... 22
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders............. 23
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters................................................................ 23
Item 6. Selected Financial Data......................................... 24
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of
Operations...................................................... 24
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data..................... 24
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure............................................ 24
Part III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant............. 24
Item 11. Executive Compensation......................................... 25
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Manage-
ment................................................................... 25
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................. 25
i
UNICOM CORPORATION
AND
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONCLUDED)
PAGE
----
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY:
Part I
Item 1. Business........................................................ 26
Item 2. Properties...................................................... 27
Item 3. Legal Proceedings............................................... 27
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders............. 27
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters................................................................ 28
Item 6. Selected Financial Data......................................... 28
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations........................................... 28
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data..................... 28
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure............................................ 28
Part III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant............. 28
Item 11. Executive Compensation......................................... 28
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management. 28
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions................. 28
ANNUAL REPORTS ON FORM 10-K FOR UNICOM CORPORATION AND COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMPANY:
Part IV
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on
Form 8-K............................................................... 29
Report of Independent Public Accountants on Supplemental Schedule to
Unicom Corporation..................................................... 37
Report of Independent Public Accountants on Supplemental Schedule to
Commonwealth Edison Company............................................ 38
Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.......................... 39
Signature Page to Unicom Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K......... 40
Signature Page to Commonwealth Edison Company Annual Report on
Form 10-K.............................................................. 41
ii
DEFINITIONS
The following terms are used in this document with the following meanings:
TERM MEANING
-------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------
BWR Boiling water reactor
CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act of 1980, as amended
CFC Chlorofluorocarbon
Clean Air Amendments Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990
ComEd Commonwealth Edison Company
Congress U.S. Congress
Cotter Cotter Corporation, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ComEd.
DOE U.S. Department of Energy
EMFs Electric and magnetic fields
FERC Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FERC Order FERC Open Access Order No. 888 issued in April 1996
IBEW International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (AFL-CIO)
ICC Illinois Commerce Commission
IDNS Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety
Illinois EPA Illinois Environmental Protection Agency
Indiana Company Commonwealth Edison Company of Indiana, Inc., which is a
wholly-owned subsidiary of ComEd.
IPCB Illinois Pollution Control Board
ISO Independent System Operator
January 31, 1997 Unicom's Current Report on Form 8-K including auditor's
Form 8-K Reports opinion dated January 31, 1997 and ComEd's Current
Report on Form 8-K including auditor's opinion dated
January 31, 1997
MAIN Mid-America Interconnected Network
MGP Manufactured gas plant
NLRB National Labor Relations Board
NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
NPL National Priorities List
NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission
PRPs Potentially responsible parties under CERCLA
PTAB Property Tax Appeals Board
Rate Order ICC rate order issued in January 1995, as subsequently
modified
Remand Order ICC rate order issued in January 1993, as subsequently
modified
SEC Securities and Exchange Commission
Trust ComEd Financing I, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary
trust of ComEd.
Unicom Unicom Corporation
Unicom Enterprises Unicom Enterprises Inc., which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Unicom.
Unicom Thermal Unicom Thermal Technologies Inc., which is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Unicom Enterprises.
Units ComEd's nuclear generating units known as Byron Unit 2
and Braidwood Units 1 and 2
U.S. EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR UNICOM CORPORATION
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
GENERAL
Unicom was incorporated in January 1994 and became the parent holding
company of ComEd and Unicom Enterprises in a corporate restructuring that
became effective on September 1, 1994. ComEd, an electric utility, is the
principal subsidiary of Unicom. Unicom Enterprises is an unregulated
subsidiary of Unicom and is engaged, through subsidiaries, in energy service
activities. Unicom also has one other subsidiary that was formed to engage in
unregulated activities. Unicom's principal executive offices are located at 10
South Dearborn Street, Post Office Box A-3005, Chicago, Illinois 60690-3005,
and its telephone number is 312/394-7399.
ComEd continues to represent substantially all of the assets, revenues and
net income of Unicom; and Unicom's resources and results of operations are
largely dependent on, and reflect, those of ComEd. Consequently, the following
discussion focuses on ComEd's utility operations although information is also
provided about Unicom's unregulated operations.
Utility Operations
ComEd is engaged principally in the production, purchase, transmission,
distribution and sale of electricity to a diverse base of residential,
commercial, industrial and wholesale customers. ComEd was organized in the
state of Illinois on October 17, 1913 as a result of the merger of
Cosmopolitan Electric Company into the original corporation named Commonwealth
Edison Company. The latter had been incorporated on September 17, 1907.
ComEd's electric service territory has an area of approximately 11,300 square
miles and an estimated population of approximately eight million as of
December 31, 1996. It includes the city of Chicago, an area of about 225
square miles with an estimated population of approximately three million from
which ComEd derived approximately one-third of its ultimate consumer revenues
in 1996. ComEd had approximately 3.4 million electric customers at December
31, 1996. ComEd's principal executive offices are located at 10 South Dearborn
Street, Post Office Box 767, Chicago, Illinois 60690-0767, and its telephone
number is 312/394-4321.
See "Fuel Supply," "Regulation" and "Item 3. Legal Proceedings" herein for
information concerning administrative and legal proceedings and certain other
matters involving ComEd, the Indiana Company and Cotter. The outcome of
certain of the proceedings or matters described or referred to therein, if not
favorable to ComEd and the Indiana Company, could have a material adverse
effect on the future business and operating results of Unicom, ComEd and the
Indiana Company.
Unregulated Operations
Unicom Enterprises is engaged, through its subsidiaries, in energy service
activities which are not subject to utility regulation by state or federal
agencies. Its principal subsidiary, Unicom Thermal, currently provides
district cooling services to office and other buildings in the city of Chicago
under a non-exclusive use agreement with Chicago expiring in 2014. District
cooling involves, in essence, the production of chilled water at a central
location(s) and its circulation to customers' buildings through a closed
circuit of supply and return piping. Such water is circulated through
customers' premises primarily for air conditioning. This process is used in
lieu of self-generated cooling. As a result of the Clean Air Amendments, the
manufacture of CFCs has been curtailed, commencing in January 1996, thereby
creating an excellent marketing opportunity for non-CFC based systems, such as
Unicom Thermal's district cooling. Unicom Thermal is involved in or
considering district cooling projects in
2
other cities, including a project in Boston with Boston Edison Technologies
Group, Inc., a project in Windsor, Ontario, Canada with Ontario Hydro and a
project in Houston, Texas with Houston Light and Power Energy Services
Company.
CHANGES IN THE ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY
Unicom and its predominant business, electric energy generation,
transmission and distribution, are in a period of fundamental change in the
manner in which customers obtain, and energy suppliers provide, energy
services. These changes are attributable to changes in technology, the
relaxation of regulatory barriers to utilities' respective service territories
as well as to efforts to change the manner in which electric utilities are
regulated. Federal law and regulations have been amended to provide for open
transmission system access, and various states are considering, or have
adopted, new regulatory structures to allow access by some or all customers to
energy suppliers in addition to the local utility.
ComEd and other energy suppliers, energy customers and other interested
parties have been active participants in the discussions related to the
economic and technical issues associated with reform. As a result of these
efforts, legislation was introduced in Illinois during January 1997 which is
intended to provide both electric service providers and their customers with
an orderly transition to a less regulated market for electric service. Under
the legislative proposal, utilities would be granted a period in which to
offer direct access experiments that would allow them and customers to gain
experience with the effects of such access, with a requirement to provide such
access starting in 2000. Such a requirement would be phased-in to customers
over several years, starting with larger load customers. The legislation would
provide utilities with an opportunity to recover costs, which might not
otherwise be recoverable, in charges for electric service in a less regulated
market through, among other things, cost savings and a transition charge for
customers who use alternate suppliers of electric power and energy. The
legislation would provide for a leveling of certain regulatory oversight and
tax provisions among electric service providers in Illinois and would also
allow certain restructurings of utility operations in order to facilitate
their response to a competitive environment. The legislation would also
provide for annual base rate decreases of 1.5 percent, starting in 2000 and
continuing through 2004. ComEd supports the proposed legislation and believes
there is support among a number of constituencies for its provisions. Other
legislative proposals have also been introduced for consideration, which
contain different provisions with respect to timing and cost recovery. The
Governor of Illinois has formed a three-person advisory committee to advise
with respect to electric utility deregulation issues. No assurance can be
given as to when any such legislation may be adopted or in what form it may be
adopted.
In response to changes in the industry, ComEd has implemented certain
customer initiatives designed to improve and strengthen customer relationships
and is undertaking an evaluation of its operations and assets, particularly
generating assets, with a view toward positioning itself for market and
industry changes. As discussed below, ComEd's actions to date have included a
five-year base rate cap, efforts to control expenditure growth through
personnel reductions, operational efficiencies and sales of generating plants.
Although ComEd's operating results and financial condition have historically
been affected by various rate proceedings, ComEd expects that these industry
changes, and ComEd's activities anticipating or responding to them, will
directly impact its operating results and financial condition over the next
several years.
Electric Utility Industry. The electric utility industry has historically
consisted of vertically integrated companies which combine generation,
transmission and distribution assets; serving customers within relatively
defined service territories; and operating under extensive regulation with
respect to rates, operations and other matters. Utilities operated under a
regulatory compact with the state, with a statutory obligation to serve all of
the electricity needs within their service territory in a
3
nondiscriminatory manner. Historically, investment and operating decisions
have been made based upon the utilities' respective assessment of those
current and projected needs of its customers. In view of this obligation,
regulation has focused on investment and operating costs, and rates have been
based on a recovery of some or all of such prudently incurred costs plus a
return on invested capital. Such rate regulation, and the ability of utilities
to recover investment and other costs through rates, has provided the basis
for recording certain costs as regulatory assets. These assets represent costs
which are allocated over future periods reflecting related regulatory
treatment, rather than expensed in the current period.
As noted previously, the United States electric utility industry is in a
process of fundamental change as state legislators and regulators re-examine
their approach to regulation and its objectives and consider a transition to a
competitive or market-based system of pricing for electric energy. Although
the process and approach have varied from state to state in terms of the
elements and timing of implementation, it is evident that the question is no
longer if, but rather how and when there will be a more competitive
electricity market. The Federal Energy Policy Act of 1992, among other things,
empowered FERC to introduce a greater level of competition into the wholesale
marketplace for electric energy. In April 1996, the FERC Order was issued
requiring utilities to file open access tariffs with regard to their
transmission systems. These tariffs set forth the terms, including prices,
under which other parties and the utility's wholesale marketing function may
use the utility's transmission system. ComEd has filed an open access tariff
with the FERC. The FERC Order requires the separation of the transmission
operations and wholesale marketing functions so as to ensure that unaffiliated
third parties have access to the same information as to system availability
and other requirements. The FERC Order further requires utilities to operate
an electronic bulletin board to make transmission price and access data
available to all potential users. A key feature of the FERC Order is that it
contemplates full recovery of a utility's costs "stranded" by competition.
These costs are "stranded" or "strandable" to the extent market-based rates
would be insufficient to allow for their full recovery. To recover stranded
costs, the utility must show that it had a reasonable expectation that it
would continue to serve the customer in question under its regulatory compact.
An important element of reform proposals under consideration is the ability
of other suppliers to provide energy in competition with a utility within its
service territory. This element generally has included consideration of some
future form of "retail wheeling," whereby a utility's transmission and
distribution system is made available to other energy suppliers for delivery
of their services to retail customers. In addition, some governmental
entities, such as cities, may elect to "municipalize" a utility's distribution
facilities through condemnation proceedings. Such municipalities would then be
able to purchase electric power on a wholesale basis and resell it to
customers over the newly acquired facilities. The FERC Order provides for the
recovery of a utility's investment stranded by municipalization. While
municipalization is possible under the present regulatory system, ComEd is not
required to grant alternative electric suppliers access to its distribution
system through any type of "retail wheeling."
Presumably, under such a modified regulatory structure, customers will base
energy purchase decisions on a combination of factors, including price,
reliability and service. In addition to the potential effects on revenues and
marketing and sales efforts, such changes can raise the question as to whether
an affected utility's rates are based on cost-based regulation, allowing
recovery of incurred costs, or are based on something else, i.e., the
marketplace. Under generally accepted accounting principles, the latter
determination would require the write off of regulatory assets and liabilities
and would require an examination as to the recoverability in revenues of other
incurred costs, with any portion determined to be unrecoverable being subject
to write off. Various approaches have been proposed to deal with such
strandable costs, from full recovery, as provided in the FERC Order, to no
recovery, as proposed by at least some of the participants in virtually all
legislative debates on regulatory reform proposals. For additional
information, see "Regulatory Assets and Liabilities" in Note 1 of Notes to
Financial Statements in the January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports.
4
Retail wheeling and municipalization are significant issues for electric
utility companies, including ComEd, because of their potential to strand a
utility's costs. Without the development of a more fully competitive
marketplace, it is not possible to develop an estimate of strandable costs
with any degree of accuracy. Any calculation of potentially strandable costs
requires that a set of assumptions be made, including the timing of open
access (customer choice), the extent of open access allowed, potential market
prices over time, sales and load growth forecasts, operating performance over
time, allowed rates over time, cost structure over time, mitigation
opportunities and strandable cost recoveries. The calculation of strandable
costs is extremely sensitive to the assumptions made, and the resulting
estimates are potentially misleading if removed from the context in which they
were calculated. At this point in time, ComEd does not subscribe to a certain
set of assumptions or a particular estimate. The proposed legislation
described above, which ComEd supports, would provide utilities the opportunity
to recover their stranded costs, if any. However, ComEd believes the amount of
its strandable costs could be material without allowance for recovery of costs
and investments it incurred under its regulatory compact, including its duty
to serve. Most reform proposals anticipating increased competition include
some form of stranded cost recovery. ComEd is taking steps, such as cost-
control measures, improving generating station reliability and additional
depreciation, to minimize its potential stranded investment. See "Rate
Matters" for additional information.
ComEd. ComEd is responding, and is undertaking a significant planning effort
with respect to further responses, to the developments within the utility
industry. During the past several years such efforts have focused on cost
reductions, including personnel reductions, efficiencies in purchasing and
inventory management, and an incentive compensation system keyed to cost
reduction and control. Notwithstanding these efforts, ComEd's costs remain
high in comparison to its neighboring utilities.
ComEd is examining its assets, particularly generating assets, with a view
toward rationalizing their investment and operating costs against their
ability to contribute to the revenues of ComEd under various market scenarios.
Such an assessment involves the consideration of numerous factors, including
revenue contribution, operating costs, impacts on ComEd's service obligations,
purchase commitments and remaining assets, and the impact of various options.
Such options include continued operation, indefinite suspension from
operation, sale to a third party and retirement or closure. If ComEd retired
or closed a generating plant, particularly a nuclear plant, without regulatory
or legislative provision for continued recovery of its investment, such
retirement could have a material impact on ComEd's and Unicom's financial
position and results of operations.
On April 17, 1996, ComEd announced that it had finalized agreements to sell
two of its coal-fired generating stations, representing approximately 1,600
megawatts of generating capacity. Under the agreements, State Line and Kincaid
stations would be sold for a total of $250 million, which approximates the
book value of the stations. The net proceeds, after income tax effects, would
be approximately $200 million, which would be used to retire or redeem
existing debt. Under the terms of the sales, ComEd would enter into exclusive
15-year purchased power agreements for the output of the plants. The
agreements are subject to regulatory approval, and proceedings have been
pending before the ICC since May 1996 to obtain those approvals. Numerous
parties have intervened in the proceedings, including various governmental and
consumer groups and ComEd's principal union. Although the Administrative Law
Judges have entered a proposed order recommending approval of the
transactions, the ICC continues to debate various aspects of the proposed
order and has not yet voted on it. ComEd's union has also filed a lawsuit in
state court alleging that the labor provisions of the Kincaid agreement are
violative of state law and are seeking to enjoin the ICC proceedings. ComEd
had previously filed an action in federal court seeking confirmation that the
state law is preempted by federal labor law, and ComEd believes that the
union's allegations are without merit. These actions were consolidated in
federal court, which has since ruled in favor of ComEd. The Union has appealed
and also has filed a grievance under its collective bargaining agreement with
ComEd claiming that ComEd is required by that agreement to require the Kincaid
purchaser to assume the terms of that agreement. The Union has also filed an
unfair labor practice charge with the NLRB
5
against the Kincaid purchaser regarding the purchaser's alleged failure to
bargain in good faith with the Union. The State Line and Kincaid agreements
give the purchasers the right to terminate the agreements if a closing has not
occurred prior to December 31, 1996 for State Line and June 30, 1997 for
Kincaid. Such closing has not occurred as of February 28, 1997.
With respect to its transmission assets, ComEd is participating with
approximately 20 other electric utility companies in an effort to form an ISO
for the midwest United States. Under the structure currently contemplated, the
ISO would set standard transmission rates and facilitate compliance with the
FERC Order. In addition, while individual utility companies would continue to
own their transmission lines, the ISO would oversee regional planning to avoid
transmission constraints. Creation of the ISO will be subject to further
negotiations among the parties as well as federal and state regulatory
approval.
ComEd is also taking actions to strengthen its relationship with its
customers. On December 11, 1995, ComEd instituted a five-year base rate cap for
all of its customers. The base rate cap does not affect ComEd's fuel cost or
nuclear decommissioning cost recovery provisions. See "Rate Matters" for
additional information about ComEd's base rate cap and other initiatives
intended to give customers more choice and control over the services they seek
and the price they pay.
NET ELECTRIC GENERATING CAPABILITY
ComEd and the Indiana Company consider their owned (non-summer) generating
capability to be 22,511,000 kilowatts. After deducting summer limitations of
557,000 kilowatts, ComEd and the Indiana Company consider their net summer
generating capability to be 21,954,000 kilowatts. The net generating capability
available for operation at any time may be less due to regulatory restrictions,
fuel restrictions, efficiency of cooling facilities and generating units being
temporarily out of service for inspection, maintenance, refueling, repairs or
modifications required by regulatory authorities. See "Regulation," subcaption
"Nuclear" and "Item 2. Properties."
ComEd's highest peak load experienced to date occurred on August 14, 1995 and
was 19,212,000 kilowatts; and the highest peak load experienced to date during
a winter season occurred on January 18, 1994 and was 14,179,000 kilowatts.
ComEd's kilowatthour sales and generation are generally higher (primarily
during the summer periods but also during the winter periods) when temperature
extremes create demand for either summer cooling or winter heating.
CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
Utility Operations
ComEd and the Indiana Company have a construction program for the year 1997,
which consists principally of improvements to their existing nuclear and other
electric production, transmission and distribution facilities. It does not
include funds to add new generating capacity to ComEd's system. The program, as
currently approved by ComEd, calls for electric plant and equipment
expenditures of approximately $982 million (excluding nuclear fuel expenditures
of approximately $322 million). It is estimated that such construction
expenditures will be as follows:
1997
----
(MILLIONS
OF DOLLARS)
Production............................................... $420
Transmission and Distribution............................ 421
General.................................................. 141
----
Total................................................... $982
----
----
6
Such construction program includes the replacement of the steam generators
at ComEd's Braidwood Unit 1 and Byron Unit 1 nuclear generating units expected
to be placed in service prior to year-end 1998. The estimated replacement cost
is approximately $460 million, including approximately $80 million for the
cost of removal of the existing steam generators. Approximately $130 million
of this estimated cost is included in the construction expenditures shown
above. Approximately $140 million has been incurred through December 31, 1996.
In addition, ComEd has continued to monitor the degradation of the steam
generators at its Zion nuclear generating station. Recent studies indicate
that the degradation is continuing and that replacement may be required sooner
than 2005. No amount has been included in ComEd's construction budget for
replacement of these steam generators, since ComEd has not decided whether or
when to effect a replacement. Based upon its experience with the replacement
activities at Braidwood and Byron, and depending on the timing of any
replacement at Zion, ComEd believes such cost could be approximately $435
million if a decision to replace is made. See "Regulation," subcaption
"Nuclear" for additional information relating to the replacement of the steam
generators and ComEd's evaluation of the need to make additional expenditures
to supplement generating capacity in light of generating outages expected in
the midwestern power grid during 1997.
ComEd and the Indiana Company's construction expenditures during 1996 were
$950 million.
ComEd's gross investment in nuclear generating capacity (excluding nuclear
fuel) is $14.3 billion at December 31, 1996, and ComEd expects that investment
to be approximately $14.5 billion by the end of 1997 as a result of
improvements. Gross additions to and retirements from utility property,
excluding nuclear fuel, of ComEd and the Indiana Company for the five years
ended December 31, 1996 were $4,407 million and $469 million, respectively.
ComEd periodically reviews its projection of probable future demand for
electricity in its service territory. It currently projects average annual
growth of 1.75% in annual peak load and 1.5% in annual output. ComEd's
forecasts of peak load indicate a need for additional resources to meet
demand, either through generating capacity, through equivalent purchased power
or through the development of additional demand-side management resources, in
1998 and each year thereafter. However, it believes that adequate resources,
including cost-effective demand-side management resources, non-utility
generation resources and other-utility power purchases, could be obtained in
sufficient quantities to meet such forecasted needs. If ComEd instead were to
build additional capacity to meet its needs, it would need to make additional
capital expenditures during 1997.
The 1997 construction program includes approximately $6 million for
environmental control facilities. Expenditures on such facilities were $16
million, $16 million and $24 million during 1996, 1995 and 1994, respectively.
Purchase commitments for ComEd and the Indiana Company, principally related
to construction and nuclear fuel, approximated $1,018 million at December 31,
1996. In addition, ComEd's estimated commitments for the purchase of coal are
indicated in the following table.
CONTRACT PERIOD COMMITMENT(1)
-------- --------- -------------
Black Butte Coal Co............................... 1997-2000 $807
Decker Coal Co. .................................. 1997-2014 $582
Big Horn Coal Co. ................................ 1998 $ 22
--------
(1) In millions of dollars, excluding transportation costs. No estimate of
future cost escalation has been made.
For additional information concerning these coal contracts and ComEd's fuel
supply, see "Fuel Supply" below and Notes 1 and 21 of Notes to Financial
Statements in the January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports.
7
ComEd forecasts that internal sources will provide more than three-fourths
of the funds required for ComEd's construction program and other capital
requirements, including nuclear fuel expenditures, contributions to nuclear
decommissioning funds, sinking fund obligations and refinancing of scheduled
debt maturities. See Notes 7 and 9 of Notes to Financial Statements in the
January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports for the summaries of the annual sinking fund
requirements and scheduled maturities for ComEd preference stock and long-term
debt, respectively. The forecast assumes the rate levels reflected in the Rate
Order (which is the subject of a pending appeal before the Illinois Appellate
Court) remain in effect. See "Rate Matters" herein for additional information.
The type and amount of external financing will depend on financial market
conditions and the needs and capital structure of ComEd at the time of such
financing. A portion of ComEd's financing is expected to be provided through
the continued sale and leaseback of nuclear fuel through ComEd's existing
nuclear fuel lease facility. See Note 18 of Notes to Financial Statements in
the January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports for more information concerning ComEd's
nuclear fuel lease facility. ComEd has approximately $906 million of unused
bank lines of credit at December 31, 1996 which may be borrowed at various
interest rates and which may be secured or unsecured. The interest rate is set
at the time of a borrowing and is based on several floating rate bank indices
plus a spread which is dependent upon the credit ratings of ComEd's
outstanding first mortgage bonds or on a prime interest rate. Collateral, if
required for the borrowings, would consist of first mortgage bonds issued
under and in accordance with the provisions of ComEd's mortgage. See Note 10
of Notes to Financial Statements in the January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports for
information concerning lines of credit. See the Statements of Consolidated
Cash Flows in the January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports for the construction
expenditures and cash flow from operating activities for the years 1996, 1995
and 1994.
During 1996, ComEd sold and leased back approximately $317 million of
nuclear fuel through its existing nuclear fuel lease facility. In addition,
ComEd issued $199 million of pollution control obligations, the proceeds of
which were used to redeem an equivalent amount of other pollution control
obligations. In January 1997, ComEd issued $150 million principal amount of
7.375% Notes due January 15, 2004, $150 million principal amount of 7.625%
Notes due January 15, 2007 and $150 million principal amount of 8.50% Company-
obligated preferred securities of subsidiary trust due January 15, 2027, the
proceeds of which were used to discharge current maturities of long-term debt
and to redeem on March 11, 1997 $200 million principal amount of First
Mortgage 9 1/2% Bonds, Series 57, due May 1, 2016. See the Statements of
Consolidated Cash Flows and Note 4 of Notes to Financial Statements in the
January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports for information regarding common stock
activity.
As of February 28, 1997, ComEd has an effective "shelf" registration
statement with the SEC for the future sale of up to an additional $505 million
of debt securities and cumulative preference stock for general corporate
purposes of ComEd, including the discharge or refund of other outstanding
securities.
Unregulated Operations
Unicom has approved capital expenditures for 1997 of approximately $56
million for Unicom Thermal, primarily representing the construction costs of
its district cooling facilities in Chicago and its share of construction costs
in Boston and Windsor. Unicom Thermal's first two district cooling facilities
in Chicago began serving customers in May 1995 and July 1996. Its third
district cooling facility in Chicago is scheduled to be completed in 1997. As
of December 31, 1996, Unicom Thermal's purchase commitments, principally
related to construction, were approximately $42 million.
Unicom expects to obtain funds to invest in its unregulated subsidiaries
principally from dividends received on its ComEd common stock and from bank
borrowings. The availability of ComEd's dividends to Unicom is dependent on
ComEd's financial performance and cash position. Other forms of financing by
ComEd to Unicom or the unregulated subsidiaries of Unicom, such as loans or
additional equity investments, none of which is expected, would be subject to
prior approval by the ICC.
8
Unicom Enterprises has a $200 million credit facility which will expire in
1999, of which $105 million was unused as of December 31, 1996. The credit
facility can be used by Unicom Enterprises to finance investments in
unregulated businesses and projects, including Unicom Thermal, and for general
corporate purposes. The credit facility is guaranteed by Unicom and includes
certain covenants with respect to Unicom's and Unicom Enterprises' operations.
Interest rates for borrowings under the credit facility are set at the time of
a borrowing and are based on either a prime interest rate or a floating rate
bank index plus a spread which varies with the credit rating of ComEd's
outstanding first mortgage bonds. See Note 10 of Notes to Financial Statements
in Unicom's January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Report for additional information
regarding certain covenants with respect to Unicom's and Unicom Enterprises'
operations.
The foregoing paragraphs in this "Construction Program" section include
forward-looking statements with respect to the future levels of capital
expenditures which are necessarily based upon assumptions regarding estimated
costs and availability of materials and services as well as contingencies.
Unforeseen events or conditions may require changes in the scope of work with
consequent changes in the timing and level of the projected expenditures. In
addition, changes in laws and regulations, or their interpretation and
enforcement, can affect the scope of certain projects, the manner in which
they are undertaken and the costs associated therewith. While ComEd and Unicom
Thermal give consideration to such factors in developing their respective
budgets, such consideration cannot predict the course of future events or
anticipate the interaction of multiple factors beyond management's control
upon project timing and cost. Consequently, actual results could differ
materially from those described.
RATE MATTERS
On January 9, 1995, the ICC issued its Rate Order in the proceedings
relating to ComEd's February 1994 rate increase request. The Rate Order
provided, among other things, for (i) an increase in ComEd's total revenues of
approximately $301.8 million (excluding add-on revenue taxes) or 5.2%, on an
annual basis, including a $303.2 million increase in base rates, (ii) the
collection of municipal franchise costs on an individual municipality basis
through a rider, and (iii) the use of a rider, with annual review proceedings,
to pass on to ratepayers increases or decreases in estimated costs associated
with the decommissioning of ComEd's nuclear generating units. See
"Depreciation and Decommissioning" in Note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements
in the January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports for additional information related to
the level of decommissioning cost collections. The ICC also determined that
the Units were 100% "used and useful" and that the previously determined
reasonable costs of such Units, as depreciated, should be included in full in
ComEd's rate base. The rates provided in the Rate Order became effective on
January 14, 1995; however, they are being collected subject to refund as a
result of subsequent judicial action. As of December 31, 1996, electric
operating revenues of approximately $651 million (excluding revenue taxes) are
subject to refund. Intervenors and ComEd have filed appeals of the Rate Order
with the Illinois Appellate Court, and oral argument was heard on January 28,
1997.
On December 11, 1995, ComEd announced a series of customer initiatives as
part of its larger ongoing effort to address the need to give all customer
classes the opportunity to benefit from increased competition in the electric
utility business, while retaining the benefits (such as reliability) of
current regulation and ensuring utilities' cost recovery for commitments made
under the obligation to serve customers. The initiatives include a five-year
cap on base electric rates at current levels and various customer service and
incentive pricing programs designed to allow customers more choice and control
over the services they seek and the prices they pay. These initiatives are in
addition to previously implemented special discount contract rate programs for
new or existing industrial customers. ComEd anticipates the initiatives will
be fully implemented in 1997 and will reduce its revenues by approximately $40
million annually (including the effects of previously implemented
9
initiatives and before income tax effects) primarily through changes in energy
utilization. Additionally in September 1996, the ICC approved ComEd's
additional depreciation initiative for 1996. ComEd's costs increased by $30
million in 1996 (before income tax effects), through the increase in
depreciation charges on its nuclear generating units. ComEd also continues to
consider the possibility of additional depreciation options. ComEd expects the
effects of these initiatives will be offset through increased revenues by
growth in its sales.
Under ComEd's initiatives, the five-year base rate cap at current levels
became effective in December 1995 and will extend until January 1, 2001. The
rate cap does not affect ComEd's fuel cost or nuclear decommissioning cost
recovery provisions. ComEd's fuel cost variances will continue to be collected
through its fuel adjustment clause, and such collections will continue to be
subject to annual reconciliation proceedings before the ICC. Likewise, nuclear
decommissioning costs will continue to be collected as described in Note 1 of
Notes to Financial Statements under "Depreciation and Decommissioning" in the
January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports.
See "Changes in the Electric Utility Industry" herein for information
regarding the legislative proposal supported by ComEd.
FUEL SUPPLY
The kilowatthour generation of ComEd and the Indiana Company for 1996 was
provided from the following fuel sources: nuclear 67%, coal 30%, oil 1% and
natural gas 2%. The lower nuclear generation as a percentage of total
generation for 1996 compared to recent prior years is primarily due to
scheduled and non-scheduled outages at certain of ComEd's nuclear generating
stations. See "Regulation," subcaption "Nuclear."
Nuclear Fuel
ComEd has uranium concentrate inventory, supply contracts and subsidiary
resources sufficient to meet all of its uranium concentrate requirements
through 1997 and portions of its uranium concentrate requirements for periods
beyond 1997. ComEd's contracted conversion services are sufficient to meet all
of its uranium conversion requirements through 1998. All of ComEd's enrichment
requirements have been contracted through September 1999 and portions of its
enrichment requirements for periods beyond 1999. Commitments for fuel
fabrication have been obtained for ComEd's nuclear units at least through
2005. ComEd does not anticipate that it will have any difficulty in
negotiating contracts for uranium concentrates, conversion, enrichment and
fuel fabrication services for its remaining requirements.
Under the Energy Policy Act of 1992, investor-owned electric utilities that
have purchased enrichment services from the DOE are being assessed amounts to
fund a portion of the cost for the decontamination and decommissioning of
uranium enrichment facilities owned and previously operated by the DOE.
ComEd's portion of such assessments is estimated to be approximately $15
million per year (to be adjusted annually for inflation) to 2007. The Act
provides that such assessments are to be treated as a cost of fuel. See Note 1
of Notes to Financial Statements under "Deferred Unrecovered Energy Costs" in
the Janaury 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports for information related to the
accounting for such costs.
See "Regulation," subcaption "Nuclear" herein for information concerning the
disposal of radioactive waste.
Coal
ComEd burns low sulfur western coal at all its coal-fired stations. ComEd's
present policy is to maintain a coal inventory of at least 30 days of high
utilization. As of February 28, 1997, coal inventories approximated 35 days.
The average cost per ton of coal consumed by ComEd and the Indiana Company for
the years 1994, 1995 and 1996, including transportation charges, was $39.50,
$41.72 and $41.16, respectively.
10
Compared to other utilities, ComEd has relatively low average fuel costs as
a result of its reliance predominantly on lower cost nuclear generation.
ComEd's coal costs, however, are high compared to those of other utilities.
ComEd's western coal contracts and its rail contracts for delivery of the
western coal provide for the purchase of certain coal at prices substantially
above currently prevailing market prices, and ComEd has significant purchase
commitments under its contracts. In addition, as of December 31, 1996, ComEd
had unrecovered fuel costs in the form of coal reserves of approximately $364
million. In prior years, ComEd's commitments for the purchase of coal exceeded
its requirements. Rather than take all the coal it was required to take, ComEd
agreed to purchase the coal in place in the form of coal reserves. For
additional information concerning ComEd's coal purchase commitments, see
"Construction Program," subcaption "Utility Operations" above. For additional
information regarding ComEd's fuel reconciliation proceedings and coal
reserves, see "Fuel Adjustment Clause" below and Note 1 of Notes to Financial
Statements in the January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports.
Oil and Gas
ComEd's fast-start peaking units use middle distillate oils. Approximately
half of this capacity can also be fueled with natural gas. ComEd's 2,698,000
kilowatt Collins station is fueled with natural gas and residual oil. ComEd
purchases oil and gas in the spot market as needed. The conversion of four of
the five units at Collins station to dual fuel capability (residual oil and
natural gas) was completed during 1994 and 1996 and a fifth unit is currently
being converted. ComEd has a contract for the delivery and storage of natural
gas from gas pipelines to Collins station which expires in 2003.
Fuel Adjustment Clause
Through its fuel adjustment clause, ComEd recovers from its customers the
cost of the fuel used to generate electricity and purchased power as compared
to fuel costs included in base rates. The amounts collected under the fuel
adjustment clause are subject to review by the ICC, which, under the Illinois
Public Utilities Act, is required to hold annual public hearings to reconcile
the collected amounts with the actual cost of fuel and power prudently
purchased. In the event that the collected amounts exceed such actual cost,
then the ICC can order that the excess be refunded.
For additional information concerning ComEd's fuel reconciliation
proceedings and coal reserves, see Note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements in
the January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports.
REGULATION
ComEd and the Indiana Company are subject to state and federal regulation in
the conduct of their respective businesses, including the operations of
Cotter. Such regulation includes rates, securities issuance, nuclear
operations, environmental and other matters. Particularly in the cases of
nuclear operations and environmental matters, such regulation can and does
affect operational and capital expenditures. ComEd is subject to regulation by
the ICC as to rates and charges, issuance of securities (other than debt
securities maturing within twelve months), service and facilities,
classification of accounts, transactions with affiliated interests as defined
in the Illinois Public Utilities Act and other matters. In addition, the ICC
in certain of its rate orders has exercised jurisdiction over ComEd's
environmental control program.
ComEd is subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC with respect to the
issuance of debt securities maturing within twelve months. ComEd is also
subject to the jurisdiction of the FERC and the DOE under the Federal Power
Act with respect to certain other matters, including the sale for resale of
electric energy and the transmission of electric energy in interstate
commerce, and to the jurisdiction of the DOE with respect to the disposal of
spent nuclear fuel and other radioactive wastes.
11
Unicom is a public utility holding company as defined by the Public Utility
Holding Company Act of 1935 because of its majority ownership of common stock
of ComEd, and ComEd is a public utility holding company as defined in such Act
because of its ownership of the Indiana Company. However, both Unicom and
ComEd are exempt from most provisions of such Act.
The Indiana Company, an "affiliated interest" of ComEd within the meaning of
the Illinois Public Utilities Act, is subject to regulation by the Indiana
Utility Regulatory Commission and to the jurisdiction of the FERC, the DOE and
federal and state of Indiana pollution control and other agencies.
Nuclear
The IDNS has jurisdiction over certain activities in Illinois relating to
nuclear power and safety, and radioactive materials. Effective June 1, 1987,
the IDNS replaced the NRC as the regulator and licensor of certain source, by-
product and special nuclear material in quantities not sufficient to form a
critical mass, including such material contained in various measuring devices
used at fossil-fuel power plants. The IDNS has promulgated regulations which
are substantially similar to the corresponding federal regulations. The IDNS
also has authority to license a low-level radioactive waste disposal facility
and to regulate alternative methods for disposing of materials which contain
only trace amounts of radioactivity.
Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, the DOE is responsible for the
selection and development of repositories for, and the disposal of, spent
nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. ComEd, as required by that Act,
has signed a contract with the DOE to provide for the disposal of spent
nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste from ComEd's nuclear generating
stations beginning not later than January 1998. The DOE advised ComEd in
December 1996 that it anticipates it will be unable to begin acceptance of
spent nuclear fuel by January 1998. It is expected this delivery schedule will
be delayed significantly. Extended delays in spent nuclear fuel acceptance by
the DOE would lead to ComEd's consideration of costly storage alternatives.
The contract with the DOE requires ComEd to pay the DOE a one-time fee
applicable to nuclear generation through April 6, 1983 of approximately $277
million, with interest to date of payment, and a fee payable quarterly equal
to one mill per kilowatthour of nuclear-generated and sold electricity after
April 6, 1983. As provided for under the contract, ComEd has elected to pay
the one-time fee, with interest, just prior to the first delivery of spent
nuclear fuel to the DOE. The costs incurred by the DOE for disposal activities
will be paid out of fees charged to owners and generators of spent nuclear
fuel and high-level radioactive waste. ComEd has primary responsibility for
the interim storage of its spent nuclear fuel. ComEd's capability to store
spent fuel is adequate for some years to come. Dresden station has spent fuel
capacity through the year 2001, Zion station has capacity through 2004, Quad
Cities has capacity through 2006 and all of the other stations have capacity
through at least 2008. ComEd is developing on site dry cask spent fuel storage
for Dresden Unit 1 at a budgeted cost of $21 million. The Dresden Unit 1
facility will use existing technology procured to meet the federal
requirements for both storage and transportation of spent nuclear fuel. The
facility is expected to be used by 1999. Meeting other spent fuel storage
requirements beyond the years stated above could require new and separate
storage facilities. The full costs for ComEd's other nuclear units have not
been determined.
The federal Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Act of 1980 provides that
states may enter into compacts to provide for regional disposal facilities for
low-level radioactive waste and restrict use of such facilities to waste
generated within the region. Between July 1, 1994 and July 1, 1995, there were
no commercial operating sites in the United States for the disposal of low-
level radioactive waste available to ComEd. However, the Barnwell, South
Carolina low-level radioactive waste site was reopened on July 1, 1995 and is
available to ComEd. ComEd entered into an agreement with the Barnwell site
operator and began shipping waste to Barnwell on August 17, 1995. Illinois has
entered into a compact with the state of Kentucky, which has been approved by
Congress as required by the
12
Waste Policy Act. Neither Illinois nor Kentucky currently has an operational
site, and one is currently not expected to be operational until after the year
2000. ComEd has temporary on-site storage capacity at its nuclear generating
stations for a limited amount of low-level radioactive waste. ComEd
anticipates the possibility of continuing difficulties in disposing of low-
level radioactive waste. Since the reopening and availability of the Barnwell
site, ComEd continues to reevaluate its options.
ComEd is subject to the jurisdiction of the NRC with respect to its nuclear
generating stations. The NRC regulations control the granting of permits and
licenses for the construction and operation of nuclear generating stations and
subject such stations to continuing review and regulation. The NRC review and
regulatory process covers, among other things, operations, maintenance, and
environmental and radiological aspects of such stations. The NRC may modify,
suspend or revoke licenses and impose civil penalties for failure to comply
with the Atomic Energy Act, the regulations under such Act or the terms of
such licenses.
Nuclear operations have been, and remain, an important focus of ComEd--given
the impact of such operations on overall operating and maintenance
expenditures and the ability of nuclear power plants to produce electric
energy at a relatively low marginal cost. ComEd operates a large number of
nuclear plants, ranging from the older Zion, Dresden and Quad Cities stations
to the more recently completed LaSalle, Byron and Braidwood stations, and is
intent upon safe, reliable and efficient operation. These plants were
constructed over a period of time in which technology, construction procedures
and regulatory initiatives and oversight have evolved, with the result that
older plants generally require greater attention and resources to meet
regulatory requirements and expectations as well as to maintain operational
reliability.
On January 29, 1997, the NRC determined that ComEd's Dresden nuclear
generating station should remain on the NRC's list of plants to be monitored
closely, where it has been since being placed on that list in 1992. The NRC
also determined that ComEd's LaSalle and Zion nuclear generating stations
should be added to that list. Although in each case the NRC recognized that
ComEd had undertaken significant management changes and had accomplished a
number of performance improvements, it expressed concern with specific issues
at each station and expressed a general concern with the sustainability of
improvements as the basis for its determination. The listing of the plants
does not prevent ComEd from operating the generating units; however, it does
mean that the NRC will devote additional resources to monitoring ComEd's
operating performance and that ComEd will need to work to demonstrate to the
NRC the sustainability of improvements which it believes it has undertaken and
is continuing to implement. In addition, an operational event occurred in the
Zion station control room during February 1997. As a result, the NRC Regional
staff has issued a letter confirming ComEd's commitment to conduct a
comprehensive assessment of the event and to develop and implement a program
to ensure adequate personnel performance in the future, including upgraded
operator training. ComEd must brief the staff on the results of its
investigation, its proposed corrective actions and other matters prior to
restarting either Zion unit, both of which are currently out of service.
In late January 1997, the NRC also took the unusual additional step of
requiring ComEd to submit information to allow the NRC to determine what
actions, if any, should be taken to assure that ComEd can safely operate its
six nuclear generating stations while sustaining performance improvement at
each site. The request also requires ComEd to submit information regarding the
criteria that it has established, or plans to establish, to measure
performance and to explain ComEd's proposed actions if the criteria are not
met. The request states the NRC staff's concerns with the "cyclical safety
performance of ComEd nuclear stations," noting the presence on the list of
plants to be monitored closely of Dresden, LaSalle and Zion stations at
various times during the past ten years. It also noted concerns regarding
"ComEd's ability to establish lasting and effective programs that result in
sustained performance improvement." The request does acknowledge the
management and organizational changes implemented by ComEd, including the
"additional focus placed on management
13
and leadership, accountability, the problem identification and corrective
action processes, material condition improvement, work control, and radiation
protection." It also acknowledges improvements seen at Dresden and Quad Cities
stations; but indicated at the same time performance declines were observed at
both LaSalle and Zion stations. The problems identified by the NRC are
consistent with weaknesses that had been identified in station self-
assessments initiated by ComEd; and management had already undertaken to
develop and implement programs designed to address these issues. ComEd has
prepared a response to the NRC which ComEd's management believes provides
sufficient information to demonstrate its ability to operate its nuclear
generating stations while sustaining performance improvements. ComEd expects
to submit this response to the NRC on March 28, 1997.
ComEd has devoted, and intends to continue to devote, significant resources
to the management and operations of its nuclear generating stations. Over the
past several years, it has increased and reinforced station management with
managers drawn from other utilities which have resolved similar operational
and performance issues. It has also sought to identify, anticipate and address
operating and performance issues in a safe, cost-effective manner while
seeking to improve the availability and capacity factors of its nuclear
generating units.
ComEd's activities with respect to its nuclear generating stations have
included improvements in operating and personnel procedures and repair and
replacement of equipment and can result in longer unit outages. In this
regard, ComEd's management decided to continue the present unit outages at its
LaSalle station until the identified performance issues have been
appropriately addressed. Zion station is also presently out of service. ComEd
presently expects the LaSalle outage to extend into the fall of 1997.
Similarly, the current Zion Unit 2 outage is expected to extend into and
likely beyond the summer of 1997, and Zion Unit 1 is expected to be out of
service until early 1998. As noted above, the Company must brief the NRC
regional staff as to certain matters before restarting either Zion unit.
The LaSalle and Zion outages are part of several outages of nuclear and
fossil generating stations that several utilities operating in the Midwestern
power grid (including ComEd) are expecting during 1997. ComEd is evaluating
the need for reinforcement of its available generating and transmission
capacity and the availability of power from third parties in light of these
regional circumstances. Such evaluation includes consideration of additional
expenditures of approximately $50 million, a portion of which is capital,
relating to enhancing generating station availability, transmission
reinforcement and purchasing power from other utilities, as well as
consideration of methods of managing customer demand for power. Such
expenditures could include demand charges for purchased power which are not
recoverable through the fuel adjustment clause under these circumstances, but
do not reflect the related energy costs for such purchased power.
Generating station availability and performance during a year may be issues
in fuel reconciliation proceedings in assessing the prudence of fuel and power
purchases during such year. Final ICC orders have been issued in fuel
reconciliation proceedings for years prior to 1994. In 1996, an intervenor
filed testimony in the fuel reconciliation proceeding for 1994 seeking a
refund of approximately $90 million relating to nuclear station performance.
In accordance with a commitment to the NRC, ComEd examined its operating
boiling water nuclear generating units in 1983 to determine the existence or
extent of inter-granular stress corrosion in certain of the large diameter
piping in those units. Inter-granular stress corrosion was discovered in the
Dresden and Quad Cities units. ComEd replaced the stainless steel piping
susceptible to stress corrosion at Dresden Unit 3. ComEd believes the remedial
actions taken to minimize the impact of stress corrosion cracking on BWR
stainless steel reactor coolant piping have been successfully completed on
Dresden Units 2 and 3, Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 and LaSalle Units 1 and 2.
Future work on this piping will consist of routine inspections and repairs. As
a result of ComEd's experience with the effects of inter-granular stress
corrosion of stainless steel materials in BWRs, an inspection,
14
repair and mitigation program of reactor vessel internals has been
implemented. This effort is intended to prevent non-budgeted costs and
refueling outage extensions resulting from unanticipated repairs occurring
during a refueling outage. For 1997, estimated expenditures for installation
of mitigation systems for LaSalle and Dresden stations are $1.7 million and
$9.4 million, respectively.
ComEd is replacing the steam generators at Byron Unit 1 and Braidwood Unit
1. The steam generator replacements are currently expected to be placed in
service prior to year-end 1998. The estimated replacement cost is
approximately $460 million, including approximately $80 million for the cost
of removal of the existing steam generators. Approximately $130 million of
this estimated cost is included in the 1997 construction program.
Approximately $140 million has been incurred through December 31, 1996. In
addition, ComEd has continued to monitor the degradation of the steam
generators at its Zion nuclear generating station. Recent studies indicate
that the degradation is continuing and that replacement may be required sooner
than 2005. No amount has been included in ComEd's construction budget for
replacement of these steam generators, since ComEd has not decided whether or
when to effect a replacement. Based upon its experience with the replacement
activities at Braidwood and Byron, and depending on the timing of any
replacement at Zion, ComEd believes such cost could be approximately $435
million if a decision to replace is made.
As of December 31, 1996, ComEd estimated that it will expend approximately
$15.5 billion, excluding any contingency allowance, for decommissioning costs
primarily during the period from 2007 through 2032. Such costs, estimated at
December 31, 1996 to aggregate $3.9 billion in current-year (1997) dollars,
are expected to be funded by external decommissioning trusts which ComEd
established in compliance with Illinois law and into which ComEd has been
making annual contributions. Future decommissioning cost estimates may be
significantly affected by the adoption of or changes to NRC regulations as
well as changes in the assumptions used in making such estimates including
changes in technology, available alternatives for the disposal of nuclear
waste, and inflation. See Note 1 of Notes to Financial Statements under
"Depreciation and Decommissioning" in the January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports
for additional information regarding decommissioning costs.
During the year 1996, civil penalties were imposed on ComEd on seven
occasions for violations of NRC regulations in amounts aggregating $450,000.
Since January 1, 1997, civil penalties were imposed on ComEd on three
occasions for violations of NRC regulations in amounts aggregating $850,000.
To ComEd's knowledge there are four current enforcement issues outstanding and
under review by the NRC.
The uranium mining and milling operations of Cotter are subject to
regulation by the state of Colorado and the NRC.
Environmental
ComEd and the Indiana Company are subject to regulation regarding
environmental matters by the United States and by the states of Illinois,
Indiana, Iowa and, in the case of Cotter, Colorado, and by local jurisdictions
where ComEd and the Indiana Company operate their facilities. The IPCB has
jurisdiction over environmental control in the state of Illinois, which
includes authority to regulate air, water and noise emissions and solid waste
disposal, together with the Illinois EPA, which enforces regulations of the
IPCB and issues permits in connection with environmental control. The U.S.
EPA administers certain federal statutes relating to such matters. The IPCB
has published a proposed rule under which it would have the power to regulate
radioactive air pollutants under the Illinois Environmental Protection Act and
the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977.
Air quality regulations, promulgated by the IPCB as well as the Indiana and
Hammond Departments of Environmental Management in accordance with federal
standards, impose restrictions on the emission of particulates, sulfur
dioxide, nitrogen oxides and other air pollutants and require permits from the
respective state and local environmental protection agencies for the operation
of
15
emission sources. Permits authorizing operation of ComEd's fossil fuel
generating facilities subject to this requirement have been obtained and,
where such permits are due to expire, ComEd has, in a timely manner, filed
applications for renewal or requested extensions of the existing permits.
Under the Federal Clean Water Act, NPDES permits for discharges into
waterways are required to be obtained from the U.S. EPA or from the state
environmental agency to which the permit program has been delegated. Those
permits must be renewed periodically. ComEd and the Indiana Company either
have NPDES permits for all of their generating stations or have pending
applications for such permits under the current delegation of the program to
the Illinois EPA or the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. ComEd
is also subject to the jurisdiction of certain pollution control agencies of
the state of Iowa with respect to the discharge into the Mississippi River
from Quad Cities station.
The Great Lakes Critical Programs Act of 1990 requires that, following the
issuance of guidance by the U.S. EPA, the states of Illinois and Indiana,
among others, adopt water quality standards, policies and procedures to assure
protection of the water quality of the Great Lakes. Water quality standards
and procedures that the states would be required to adopt are to be based on
the U.S. EPA's final guidance issued in March 1995. ComEd is presently
following state activities to promulgate rules implementing the final
guidance, and assessing the extent to which such may impact certain ComEd
facilities. Ultimately, the new rules may require that ComEd install
additional pollution control equipment or restrict operations at its
facilities that discharge, either directly or indirectly, into Lake Michigan.
The Clean Air Amendments require reductions in nitrogen oxide emissions from
ComEd's and the Indiana Company's fossil fuel generating units. In January
1996, the U.S. EPA issued a final rule exempting existing sources inside the
Chicago ozone non-attainment area from further nitrogen oxide emission
reductions; however, this exemption is limited pending further study of ozone
transport. The Illinois EPA is also considering nitrogen oxide emission
reductions at ComEd generating stations outside the Chicago ozone non-
attainment area also due to ozone transport. Under the Acid Rain program, the
U.S. EPA will prepare nitrogen oxide emission regulations that would apply to
all of ComEd's boilers with a compliance date of January 1, 2000. These
regulations were finalized on December 19, 1996 and include limits for cyclone
and tangentially fired boilers of 0.86 and 0.40 lbs/mm Btu, respectively.
CERCLA provides for immediate response and removal actions coordinated by
the U.S. EPA to releases of hazardous substances into the environment and
authorizes the U.S. Government either to clean up sites at which hazardous
substances have created actual or potential environmental hazards or to order
persons responsible for the situation to do so. Under CERCLA, generators and
transporters of hazardous substances, as well as past and present owners and
operators of hazardous waste sites, are made strictly, jointly and severally
liable for the cleanup costs of waste at sites, most of which are listed by
the U.S. EPA on the NPL. These responsible parties can be ordered to perform a
cleanup, can be sued for costs associated with a U.S. EPA directed cleanup,
may voluntarily settle with the U.S. Government concerning their liability for
cleanup costs, or may voluntarily begin a site investigation and site
remediation prior to listing on the NPL under state oversight. Various states,
including Illinois, have enacted statutes which contain provisions
substantially similar to CERCLA. ComEd and its subsidiaries are or are likely
to become parties to proceedings initiated by the U.S. EPA, state agencies
and/or other responsible parties under CERCLA with respect to a number of
sites, including MGP sites, or may voluntarily undertake to investigate and
remediate sites for which they may be liable under CERCLA.
MGPs manufactured gas in Illinois from approximately 1850 to 1950. ComEd
generally did not operate MGPs as a corporate entity but did, however, acquire
MGP sites as part of the absorption of smaller utilities. Approximately half
of these sites were transferred to Northern Illinois Gas Company
16
as part of a general conveyance in 1954. ComEd also acquired former MGP sites
as vacant real estate on which ComEd facilities have been constructed. To
date, ComEd has identified 44 former MGP sites for which it may be liable for
remediation. ComEd presently estimates that its costs of former MGP site
investigation and remediation will aggregate from $25 million to $150 million
in current-year (1997) dollars. It is expected that the costs associated with
investigation and remediation of former MGP sites will be incurred over a
period of years. Because ComEd is not able to determine the most probable
liability for such MGP costs, in accordance with accounting standards, a
reserve of approximately $25 million has been included on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets in the January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports as of December 31,
1996, which reflects the low end of the range of ComEd's estimate of the
liability associated with former MGP sites. In addition, as of December 31,
1996, a reserve of $8 million has been included on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets in the January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Reports representing ComEd's estimate
of the liability associated with cleanup costs of remediation sites other than
former MGP sites. Approximately half of this reserve relates to anticipated
cleanup costs associated with a property formerly used as a tannery which was
purchased by ComEd in 1973. Unicom and ComEd presently estimate that ComEd's
costs of investigating and remediating the former MGP and other remediation
sites pursuant to CERCLA and state environmental laws will not have a material
impact on the financial position or results of operations of Unicom or ComEd.
These cost estimates are based on currently available information regarding
the responsible parties likely to share in the costs of responding to site
contamination, the extent of contamination at sites for which the
investigation has not yet been completed and the cleanup levels to which sites
are expected to have to be remediated.
In 1991, the U.S. Government filed a complaint in U.S. District Court
alleging that ComEd and four other defendants are PRPs for remediation costs
associated with surface, soil and groundwater contamination alleged to have
occurred from the disposal by other persons of hazardous wastes at a site
located near ComEd's Byron station near Byron, Illinois. The U.S. Government
alleges that a portion of the site is owned by ComEd. The U.S. Government is
presently seeking reimbursement from the PRPs for past study and response
costs associated with the site of approximately $7 million. On or about
October 31, 1996, ComEd and the U.S. Government filed with the Court a joint
statement indicating that they had reached an agreement in principle to settle
ComEd's total liability for a total payment of $1.35 million in cash and
services.
The outcome of many of the regulatory proceedings referred to above, if not
favorable, could have a material adverse effect on Unicom and ComEd's future
business and operating results.
An unresolved issue is whether exposure to EMFs may result in adverse health
effects or damage to the environment. EMFs are produced by virtually all
devices carrying or utilizing electricity, including transmission and
distribution lines as well as home appliances. If regulations are adopted
related to EMFs, they could affect the construction and operation of
electrical equipment, including transmission and distribution lines and the
cost of such equipment. ComEd cannot predict the effect on the cost of such
equipment or operations if new regulations related to EMFs are adopted. In the
absence of such regulations, EMFs have nonetheless become an issue in siting
facilities and in other land use contexts. Litigation has been filed in a
variety of locations against a variety of defendants (including ComEd)
alleging that the presence or use of electrical equipment has had an adverse
effect on the health of persons or has caused a diminution in property values
of land adjacent to these facilities. If plaintiffs are successful in
litigation of this type and it becomes widespread, the impact on ComEd and on
the electric utility industry is not predictable, but could be severe.
From time to time, Unicom and its subsidiaries are, or are claimed to be, in
violation of or in default under orders, statutes, rules or regulations
relating to environmental controls and other matters, compliance plans imposed
upon or agreed to by them or permits issued by various state and federal
agencies for the construction or operation of their facilities. Unicom and
ComEd do not believe,
17
so far as they now foresee, that such violations or defaults will have a
material adverse effect on their future business and operating results, except
for events otherwise described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, which could
have such an effect.
EMPLOYEES
Unicom and its subsidiary companies employed 16,871 people at December 31,
1996. ComEd and the Indiana Company had approximately 16,845 employees at
December 31, 1996, of which approximately 9,270 ComEd employees were
represented by Local 15 of the IBEW and 131 Indiana Company employees were
represented by Local 12502 of the United Steelworkers of America. The existing
collective bargaining agreement with Local 15 provides, among other things,
for a term expiring on September 30, 1997, a retroactive wage increase to
April 1, 1995 (substantially all of which had been accrued on ComEd's books as
of December 31, 1995), a further wage increase of approximately 2.7% effective
on April 1, 1996 and a 1.5% wage increase effective on April 1, 1997. In
addition, the agreement provides that union employees are eligible to receive
1995 and 1996 incentive payments dependent upon the achievement of certain
corporate and individual goals and reflects a previously implemented voluntary
separation offer to employees who accepted and left ComEd's employ by year-end
1995. For the term of the agreement, a revision to the provision relative to
contracting work was negotiated which will give ComEd the flexibility needed
to deal with personnel relocations and repositioning following the voluntary
separation employee reduction, as well as to smooth out the peaks and valleys
in the labor requirements of the business. This flexibility will provide a
stable work environment for ComEd's employees.
The supplemental agreements covering life insurance, savings and investment
plan, healthcare coverage for medical, dental and vision are effective through
September 30, 1997. The supplemental agreement covering pension benefits is
effective through September 30, 1999.
INTERCONNECTIONS
ComEd has interconnections for the transmission of electricity with Central
Illinois Light Company, Central Illinois Public Service Company, Illinois
Power Company, Indiana Michigan Power Company (a subsidiary of American
Electric Power Company), Interstate Power Company, MidAmerican Energy Company,
Northern Indiana Public Service Company, Wisconsin Electric Power Company and
Wisconsin Power and Light Company for the purpose of exchanging energy and for
other forms of mutual assistance.
ComEd and 14 other Midwest power systems are regular members of MAIN (which
also includes 23 associate members and five affiliate members). The members
have entered into an agreement to work together to ensure the reliability of
electric power production and transmission throughout the area they serve.
FRANCHISES
ComEd's franchises are in general deemed adequate to permit it to engage in
the business it now conducts.
In the city of Chicago, ComEd operates under a nonexclusive electric
franchise ordinance effective January 1, 1992, and continuing in force until
December 31, 2020. ComEd derives approximately one-third of its ultimate
consumer revenues from customers located within the city of Chicago.
18
The electric business outside of the city of Chicago is conducted in
municipalities under nonexclusive franchises and, where required, under
certificates of convenience and necessity granted by the ICC. The following
tabulation summarizes as of December 31, 1996 the expiration dates of the
electric franchises held in the 396 municipalities outside of the city of
Chicago capable of granting franchises and in which ComEd currently provides
electric service.
ESTIMATED
NUMBER OF AGGREGATE
FRANCHISE EXPIRATION PERIODS MUNICIPALITIES POPULATION
- ---------------------------- -------------- ----------
1997-2006............................................. 3 89,000
2007-2017............................................. 11 97,000
2018-2028............................................. 3 4,000
2029-2039............................................. 1 *
2040 and subsequent years............................. 375 4,032,000
No stated time limit.................................. 3 61,000
- --------
*Less than 1,000 people.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The effective year of election of the executive officers to their present
positions and the prior positions they have held with Unicom or other
companies since January 1, 1992 are described below.
NAME AND AGE POSITION
-------------- ------------------------------------------------------------
James J. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Unicom since 1994
O'Connor, 60 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ComEd since
1980.
Leo F. Mullin, Vice Chairman of Unicom since 1995; Vice Chairman of ComEd
54 since 1995; President and Chief Operating Officer of First
Chicago Corporation, 1993 to 1995 and Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer of American National Bank and
Trust Company of Chicago, 1992 to 1993.
Samuel K. President of Unicom since 1994; President of ComEd since
Skinner, 58 1993; General Chairman of Republican National Committee,
1992 to 1993 and Chief of Staff to President of the United
States, 1992.
Donald A. Senior Vice President of Unicom since 1995; President of
Petkus, 55 Unicom Thermal since 1995; Senior Vice President of ComEd
since 1992 and Vice President of ComEd, 1992.
John C. Vice President of Unicom since 1994 and Vice President of
Bukovski, 54 ComEd since 1989.
John T. Vice President of Unicom since 1996; Vice President of ComEd
Costello, 48 since 1996; Manager of Corporate Relations of ComEd, 1995
to 1996 and Manager of Public Affairs of ComEd, 1992 to
1995.
Thomas J. Vice President of Unicom since 1996; Vice President of ComEd
McCaffrey, 52 since 1996; Vice President of Mercer Management Consulting,
1995 to 1996 and Corporate Senior Vice President of First
Chicago Corporation, 1992 to 1994.
Roger F. Comptroller of Unicom since 1994 and Comptroller of ComEd
Kovack, 48 since 1989.
Dennis F. Treasurer of Unicom since 1994 and Treasurer of ComEd since
O'Brien, 51 1989.
David A. Secretary of Unicom since 1994 and Secretary of ComEd since
Scholz, 55 1989.
The present term of office of each of the above executive officers extends
to the first meeting of Unicom's Board of Directors after the next annual
election of Directors scheduled to be held on May 29, 1997.
There are no family relationships among the executive officers, directors
and nominees for director of Unicom.
19
OPERATING STATISTICS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
----------------------------------
1996 1995 1994
---------- ---------- ----------
Operating Revenues (thousands of dol-
lars)(1):
Residential............................... $2,541,873 $2,621,038 $2,273,763
Small commercial and industrial........... 2,113,716 2,073,998 1,917,084
Large commercial and industrial........... 1,445,708 1,425,784 1,381,251
Public authorities........................ 503,004 487,142 452,512
Electric railroads........................ 29,651 26,894 26,179
Provisions for revenue refunds--ultimate
consumers................................ -- -- (15,909)
Sales for resale (net of provisions for
revenue refunds)......................... 235,041 207,256 187,147
Other revenues............................ 68,031 67,933 55,494
---------- ---------- ----------
Total.................................. $6,937,024 $6,910,045 $6,277,521
---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ----------
Sales (millions of kilowatthours):
Residential............................... 22,310 23,303 21,376
Small commercial and industrial........... 25,131 25,313 24,320
Large commercial and industrial........... 23,896 23,777 23,450
Public authorities........................ 7,336 7,158 6,885
Electric railroads........................ 424 390 397
Sales for resale.......................... 12,178 11,412 8,743
---------- ---------- ----------
Total.................................. 91,275 91,353 85,171
---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ----------
Sources of Electric Energy (millions of
kilowatthours):
Generation--
Nuclear.................................. 62,610 70,261 63,795
Fossil................................... 30,315 26,231 26,361
Fast-start peaking units................. 123 116 87
---------- ---------- ----------
Net generation......................... 93,048 96,608 90,243
Purchased power........................... 6,129 2,475 2,071
Company use and losses.................... (7,902) (7,730) (7,143)
---------- ---------- ----------
Total.................................. 91,275 91,353 85,171
---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ----------
Cost of Fuel Consumed (per million Btu):
Nuclear................................... $0.53 $0.52 $0.53
Coal...................................... $2.41 $2.43 $2.31
Oil....................................... $3.41 $3.06 $2.89
Natural gas............................... $2.75 $1.85 $2.27
Average all fuels......................... $1.17 $1.05 $1.08
Peak Load (kilowatts)...................... 18,916,000 19,212,000 17,928,000
Number of Customers (at end of year):
Residential............................... 3,102,101 3,079,381 3,047,354
Small commercial and industrial........... 289,803 288,848 286,793
Large commercial and industrial........... 1,550 1,539 1,528
Public authorities........................ 12,142 12,039 12,059
Electric railroads and resale............. 46 26 20
---------- ---------- ----------
Total.................................. 3,405,642 3,381,833 3,347,754
---------- ---------- ----------
---------- ---------- ----------
Average Annual Revenue Per Residential Cus-
tomer
(excluding light bulb service)............ $819.52 $852.18 $748.10
Average Use Per Residential Customer
(kilowatthours)........................... 7,213 7,598 7,056
Average Revenue Per Kilowatthour(2):
Residential (excluding light bulb serv-
ice)..................................... 11.36c 11.22c 10.60c
Small commercial and industrial........... 8.41c 8.19c 7.88c
Large commercial and industrial........... 6.05c 6.00c 5.89c
- --------
(1) See "Rate Matters" above.
(2) Average revenue per kilowatthour after reflecting provisions for revenue
refunds and after reflecting revenue refunds and related interest credited
to customers in 1994 was as follows:
1994
--------------------------------
AFTER DEDUCTIONS FOR
--------------------------------
PROVISIONS FOR REVENUE
REVENUE REFUNDS REFUNDS CREDITED
--------------- ----------------
Residential 10.57c 8.22c
Small commercial
and industrial 7.86c 6.43c
Large commercial
and industrial 5.88c 4.76c
20
FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION
Certain portions of these Annual Reports contain forward looking statements
with respect to the consequences of future events, including estimates of
costs associated with certain actions and outcomes. Unforeseen events or
conditions may require changes in the factors affecting such estimates and the
projected results thereof. Consequently, actual results could differ
materially from the estimates presented. See the last paragraph under the
subheading "Construction Program" in "Item 1. Business" for additional
information regarding certain caveats affecting forward looking statements.
Forward looking information is contained in various sections of these Annual
Reports, including, without limitation, (i) "Item 1. Business" under the
subheading "Regulation--Nuclear," with respect to the estimated costs of
decommissioning nuclear generating stations, (ii) "Item 1. Business" under the
subheading "Construction Program," regarding ComEd's construction program
budget, (iii) "Item 1. Business" under the subheadings "Construction Program"
and "Regulation--Nuclear," regarding the time frame for steam generator
replacement at ComEd's Zion nuclear generating station, (iv) "Item 1.
Business" under the subheading "Regulation--Environmental," regarding cleanup
costs associated with MGP and other remediation sites and (v) "Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" and "Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" which,
in the case of Unicom, incorporate portions of Unicom's January 31, 1997 Form
8-K Report which contain forward looking information as described therein, in
the case of ComEd, incorporate portions of ComEd's January 31, 1997 Form 8-K
Report which contain forward looking information as described therein.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
ComEd's electric properties are located in Illinois and the Indiana
Company's electric facilities are located in Indiana. In management's
opinion, ComEd and the Indiana Company's operating properties are adequately
maintained and are substantially in good operating condition. The electric
generating, transmission, distribution and general facilities of ComEd and the
Indiana Company represent approximately 66%, 10%, 21% and 3%, respectively, of
their gross investment in electric plant and equipment in service.
The electric generating stations, substations and a portion of the
transmission rights of way of ComEd and the Indiana Company are owned in fee.
A significant portion of the electric transmission and distribution facilities
is located over or under highways, streets, other public places or property
owned by others, for which permits, grants, easements or licenses (deemed
satisfactory by ComEd, but without examination of underlying land titles) have
been obtained. The principal plants and properties of ComEd are subject to
the lien of ComEd's Mortgage dated July 1, 1923, as amended and supplemented,
under which ComEd's first mortgage bonds are issued.
The net generating capability of ComEd and the Indiana Company is derived
from the following electric generating facilities:
NET GENERATING
CAPABILITY
STATION LOCATION (KILOWATTS)
------- ---------------- --------------
Nuclear--
Zion Zion 2,080,000
Dresden Near Morris 1,588,000
Quad Cities Near Cordova 1,183,000(1)
LaSalle County Near Seneca 2,156,000
Byron Near Byron 2,240,000
Braidwood Near Braidwood 2,240,000
Fossil--
Collins Near Morris 2,698,000
Powerton Near Pekin 1,400,000
Joliet 6 Near Joliet 302,000
Joliet 7 & 8 Near Joliet 1,025,000
Kincaid Near Taylorville 1,108,000
Will County Near Lockport 1,092,000
Waukegan Waukegan 725,000
Crawford Chicago 542,000
State Line Hammond, Indiana 490,000
Fisk Chicago 321,000
Fast-Start Peaking Units(2) Various 1,321,000
----------
Net non-summer generating capability 22,511,000
Deduct--Summer limitations 557,000
----------
Net summer generating capability 21,954,000
==========
- --------
(1) Excludes the 25% undivided interest of MidAmerican Energy Company in the
Quad Cities station.
(2) Generating units normally designed for use only during the maximum load
period of a designated time interval. Such units are capable of starting
and coming on-line quickly.
21
Major electric transmission lines owned and in service are as follows:
VOLTAGE CIRCUIT
(VOLTS) MILES
------- -------
765,000........................................................... 90
345,000........................................................... 2,533
138,000........................................................... 2,725
ComEd's electric distribution system includes 38,040 pole line miles of
overhead lines and 32,850 cable miles of underground lines. A total of
approximately 1,320,350 poles are included in ComEd's distribution system, of
which about 590,630 poles are owned jointly with telephone companies.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
During 1989 and 1991, actions were brought in federal and state courts in
Colorado against ComEd and Cotter seeking unspecified damages and injunctive
relief based on allegations that Cotter has permitted radioactive and other
hazardous material to be released from its mill into areas owned or occupied
by the plaintiffs resulting in property damage and potential adverse health
effects. In February 1994, a federal jury returned nominal dollar verdicts on
eight bellwether plaintiffs' claims in these cases, which verdicts were upheld
on appeal. The remaining claims in the 1989 actions are the subject of a
settlement agreement entered into by counsel for the plaintiffs and Cotter. If
the settlement agreement is implemented, the 1989 actions will be dismissed.
Although the remaining cases will necessarily involve the resolution of
numerous contested issues of fact and law, Unicom and ComEd's determination is
that these actions will not have a material impact on their financial position
or results of operations.
In July 1995, the Chicago area experienced several consecutive days of
unusually high temperatures coupled with high humidity. Between July 12 and
14, 1995, ComEd experienced record demand for electricity. On July 14, 1995, a
fire in a substation caused a power outage to approximately 40,000 customers.
Other equipment failures in the same general area caused certain of these
customers to be without power for up to 48 hours. In the wake of these power
outages, three class action lawsuits were filed against ComEd seeking recovery
of damages for property losses allegedly suffered. One suit seeks at least $10
million in damages; the others seek unspecified damages. One individual suit
was also filed seeking damages less than $100,000 for property losses.
ComEd has appeals pending in applicable counties in connection with property
tax assessments for its Byron, Braidwood and LaSalle nuclear generating
stations. These proceedings seek refunds and reduced valuations resulting in
lower property taxes for the challenged and subsequent years. In January 1996,
the PTAB rendered a decision substantially adopting ComEd's positions with
respect to the Byron nuclear station. Thereafter, the Ogle County Board of
Review issued a revised assessment. ComEd has received tax bills for 1995
taxes, payable in 1996, based on the revised assessment. However, certain Ogle
County taxing bodies have filed legal actions challenging both the PTAB
decision and the Board of Review assessment. ComEd has also challenged the
assessment, on the grounds that it does not fully implement the PTAB decision.
ComEd continues to challenge tax assessments with respect to other properties.
The reduction in ComEd's provision for real estate taxes in 1995 and 1996
reflects the bills received.
On November 1, 1996, the City of Chicago, Illinois filed a demand for the
appointment of an Adjustment Board before the American Arbitration Association
under the provisions of its franchise agreement with ComEd. In its demand, the
City alleges, among other items, that ComEd has failed to carry out certain
commitments related to system reliability under the franchise agreement which
requires ComEd to budget $1 billion in expenditures for transmission and
distribution enhancements within or for the benefit of Chicago over a ten year
period that commenced in January 1992. ComEd is disputing the City's
allegations. During the five years since January 1992, ComEd has expended
approximately $426 million to enhance electric service reliability and energy
supply for the City, and it continues to review, and budget appropriately, for
needed projects.
22
See "Item 1. Business," subcaptions "Rate Matters," "Fuel Supply--Fuel
Adjustment Clause" and "Regulation" above for information concerning other
legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
None.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
ComEd's securities and other securities guaranteed by ComEd are currently
rated by three principal securities rating agencies as follows:
STANDARD DUFF &
MOODY'S & POOR'S PHELPS
------- -------- ------
First mortgage and secured pollution control bonds.. Baa2 BBB BBB
Publicly-held debentures and unsecured pollution
control
obligations........................................ Baa3 BBB- BBB-
Convertible preferred stock......................... baa3 BBB- BBB-
Preference stock.................................... baa3 BBB- BBB-
ComEd-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred se-
curities
of the Trust....................................... baa3 BBB- BBB-
Commercial paper.................................... P-2 A-2 D-2
In January 1997, Moody's changed the rating outlook on ComEd's securities
from "stable" to "negative" and Duff & Phelps added ComEd's securities to
"Rating Watch-Down." As of March 1997, Standard & Poor's rating outlook on
ComEd remained "stable."
The above ratings reflect only the views of such rating agencies and each
rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Generally,
rating agencies base their ratings on information furnished to them by the
issuing company and on investigations, studies and assumptions by the rating
agencies. There is no assurance that any particular rating will continue for
any given period of time or that it will not be changed or withdrawn entirely
if in the judgment of the rating agency circumstances so warrant. Such
ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities.
The following is a brief summary of the meanings of the above ratings and
the relative rank of the above ratings within each rating agency's
classification system.
Moody's top four long-term debt ratings (Aaa, Aa, A and Baa) are generally
considered "investment grade." Obligations rated Baa are considered as medium
grade obligations, neither highly protected nor poorly secured. Such
obligations lack outstanding investment characteristics and in fact have
speculative characteristics. A numerical modifier in Moody's system shows
relative standing within the principal rating category, with 1 indicating the
high end of that category, 2 the mid-range and 3 the low end. Standard &
Poor's top four bond ratings (AAA, AA, A and BBB) are generally considered to
describe obligations in which investment characteristics predominate.
Obligations rated BBB are regarded as having an adequate capacity to pay
interest and repay principal. Such obligations normally exhibit adequate
protection parameters, but adverse economic conditions or changing
circumstances are more likely to lead to weakened capacity to pay. A plus or
minus sign in Standard & Poor's system shows relative standing within the
major rating categories.
Both Moody's and Standard & Poor's preferred stock ratings represent
relative security of dividends. Moody's top four preferred stock ratings
(aaa, aa, a and baa) are generally considered "investment grade." Moody's baa
rating describes a medium grade preferred stock, neither highly
23
protected nor poorly secured. Standard & Poor's top four preferred stock
ratings (AAA, AA, A and BBB) are generally considered "investment grade."
Standard & Poor's BBB rating applies to medium grade preferred stock which is
below A ("sound") and above BB ("lower grade").
Duff & Phelps' credit rating scale has 17 alphabetical categories, of which
ratings AAA through BBB (with AAA being the highest rating) represent
investment grade securities. Ratings of BBB+, BBB and BBB- represent the
lowest category of "investment grade" rating. This category describes
securities with below average protection factors but which are considered
sufficient for institutional investment. Considerable variability in risk
occurs during economic cycles. Ratings of BB+, BB and BB- describe below
investment grade securities which are deemed likely to meet obligations when
due. Present or prospective financial protection factors of these securities
fluctuate according to industry conditions or company fortunes.
Moody's P-2 rating of commercial paper is the second highest of three
possible ratings; P-2 describes a strong capacity for repayment of short-term
promissory obligations. Standard & Poor's rates commercial paper in four
basic categories with A-2 being the second highest category. Duff & Phelps
rates commercial paper in three basic categories, with D-2 indicating the
middle category.
Further explanations of the significance of ratings may be obtained from the
rating agencies.
Additional information required by Item 5 is incorporated herein by
reference to the "Price Range and Cash Dividends Paid Per Share of Common
Stock" on page 3 of Unicom's January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Report.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The information required by Items 6, 7 and 8 is incorporated herein by
reference to the "Summary of Selected Consolidated Financial Data" on page 3,
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" on pages 4 through 16, and the audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto on pages 17 through 45 of Unicom's January 31,
1997 Form 8-K Report. Reference is also made to "Item 1. Business,"
subcaptions "Construction Program," "Regulation" and "Changes in the Electric
Utility Industry" for additional information.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The information required by Item 10 relating to directors and nominees for
election as directors at Unicom's Annual Meeting of shareholders to be held on
May 29, 1997 is incorporated herein by reference to the information under the
heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in
Unicom's definitive Proxy Statement ("1997 Proxy Statement") to be filed with
the SEC prior to April 30, 1997 pursuant to Regulation 14A under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The information required by Item 10 relating
to executive officers is set forth in Part I of Unicom's
24
Annual Report on Form 10-K under "Item 1. Business," subcaption "Executive
Officers of the Registrant" and under the heading "Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" of Unicom's 1997 Proxy Statement,
which are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to
the information labelled "Compensation of Directors" and the paragraphs under
the heading "Executive Compensation" (other than the paragraphs under the
heading "Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee Report on Executive
Compensation") of Unicom's 1997 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to
the stock ownership information under the heading "Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in Unicom's 1997 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
None.
25
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
See Unicom's "Item 1. Business" (other than the paragraphs under the
headings "General--Unregulated Operations," "Construction Program--Unregulated
Operations" and "Executive Officers of the Registrant"), which is incorporated
herein by this reference.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The effective year of election of the executive officers to their present
positions and the prior positions they have held with ComEd or other companies
since January 1, 1992 are described below.
NAME AND AGE POSITION
------------ --------------------------------------------------------------
James J. Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ComEd since 1980 and
O'Connor, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Unicom since 1994.
60
Leo F. Vice Chairman of ComEd since 1995; Vice Chairman of Unicom
Mullin, 54 since 1995; President and Chief Operating Officer of First
Chicago Corporation, 1993 to 1995 and Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer of American National Bank and Trust
Company of Chicago, 1992 to 1993.
Samuel K. President of ComEd since 1993; President of Unicom since 1994;
Skinner, 58 General Chairman of Republican National Committee, 1992 to
1993 and Chief of Staff to President of the United States,
1992.
Thomas J. Executive Vice President of ComEd since January 1997; Senior
Maiman, 58 Vice President of ComEd, 1992 to January 1997 and Vice Presi-
dent of ComEd, 1992.
Robert J. Executive Vice President of ComEd since January 1997; Senior
Manning, 54 Vice President of ComEd, 1992 to January 1997 and Vice Presi-
dent of ComEd, 1992.
Donald A. Senior Vice President of ComEd since 1992; Vice President of
Petkus, 55 ComEd, 1992; Senior Vice President of Unicom since 1995 and
President of Unicom Thermal since 1995.
Cordell Senior Vice President of ComEd, 1987 to 1997 (Announced re-
Reed, 59 tirement in January 1997).
Michael J. Senior Vice President of ComEd since 1993 and Vice President
Wallace, 49 of ComEd, 1992 to 1993.
John C. Vice President of ComEd since 1989 and Vice President of
Bukovski, Unicom since 1994.
54
Frank M. Vice President of ComEd since January 1997; Governmental Af-
Clark, 51 fairs Vice President 1996 to January 1997 and Governmental
Affairs Manager, 1992 to 1996.
John T. Vice President of ComEd since 1996; Manager of Corporate Rela-
Costello, tions of ComEd, 1995 to 1996; Manager of Public Affairs of
48 ComEd, 1992 to 1995 and Vice President of Unicom since 1996.
Louis O. Vice President of ComEd since 1992 and Assistant Vice Presi-
DelGeorge, dent of ComEd, 1992.
49
William H. Vice President of ComEd since 1992 and Manager of Marketing
Downey, 52 and Customer Services of ComEd, 1992.
William H. Vice President of ComEd since 1994; Manager of Quality of
Dunbar, ComEd, 1992 to 1994 and Division Vice President of ComEd--
Jr., 56 Chicago North, 1992.
26
NAME AND AGE POSITION
------------ --------------------------------------------------------------
J. Stanley Vice President of ComEd since 1987.
Graves, 60
Harold W. Vice President of ComEd since 1995; Executive Vice President
Keiser, 53 and Chief Operating Officer of Entergy Operations, Inc., 1993
to 1995 and Senior Vice President of Pennsylvania Power &
Light Company, 1992 to 1993.
Emerson W. Vice President of ComEd since 1992 and Fossil Engineering and
Lacey, 55 Construction Manager of ComEd, 1992.
Thomas J. Vice President of ComEd since 1996; Vice President of Unicom
McCaffrey, since 1996; Vice President of Mercer Management Consulting,
52 1995 to 1996 and Corporate Senior Vice President of First
Chicago Corporation, 1992 to 1994.
Paul D. Vice President of ComEd since 1992 and Manager of Transmission
McCoy, 46 and Distribution Operations of ComEd, 1992.
Robert A. Vice President of ComEd 1994 to 1996 (Resigned January 1997)
Paul, 53 and Corporate Purchasing Manager of Digital Equipment Corpo-
ration, 1992 to 1994.
J. Stephen Vice President of ComEd since 1994 and Senior Vice President
Perry, 58 of Illinois Power Company, 1992 to 1994.
James A. Vice President of ComEd since 1993 and General Manager of Fuel
Small, 53 Services of Georgia Power Company, 1992 to 1993.
Pamela B. Vice President and General Counsel of ComEd since 1993 and
Strobel, 44 Partner of Sidley & Austin, 1992 to 1993.
Roger F. Comptroller of ComEd since 1989 and Comptroller of Unicom
Kovack, 48 since 1994.
Dennis F. Treasurer of ComEd since 1989 and Treasurer of Unicom since
O'Brien, 51 1994.
David A. Secretary of ComEd since 1989 and Secretary of Unicom since
Scholz, 55 1994.
The present term of office of each of the above executive officers, except
for Mr. Reed and Mr. Paul, extends to the first meeting of ComEd's Board of
Directors after the next annual election of Directors scheduled to be held on
May 29, 1997.
There are no family relationships among the executive officers, directors
and nominees for director of ComEd.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
See Unicom's "Item 2. Properties," which is incorporated herein by this
reference.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
See Unicom's "Item 3. Legal Proceedings," which is incorporated herein by
this reference.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE BY SECURITY HOLDERS.
None.
27
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
See Unicom's "Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters" (other than the last paragraph thereof), which is
incorporated herein by reference.
Additional information required by Item 5 is incorporated herein by
reference to the "Cash Dividends Paid Per Share of Common Stock" on page 3 of
ComEd's January 31, 1997 Form 8-K Report.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
The information required by Items 6, 7 and 8 is incorporated herein by
reference to the "Summary of Selected Consolidated Financial Data" on page 3,
"Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations" on pages 4 through 15, and the audited consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto on pages 16 through 42 of ComEd's January 31,
1997 Form 8-K Report. Reference is also made to "Item 1. Business,"
subcaptions "Changes in the Electric Utility Industry," "Construction
Program," and "Regulation" for additional information.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT.
The information required by Item 10 relating to directors and nominees for
election as directors at ComEd's Annual Meeting of shareholders to be held on
May 29, 1997 is incorporated herein by reference to information under the
heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" in
ComEd's definitive Information Statement ("1997 Information Statement") to be
filed with the SEC prior to April 30, 1997 pursuant to Regulation 14C under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The information required by Item 10
relating to executive officers is set forth in Part I of ComEd's Annual Report
on Form 10-K under "Item 1. Business," subcaption "Executive Officers of the
Registrant" and under the heading "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management" in ComEd's 1997 Information Statement, which are
incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.
The information required by Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to
the paragraph labelled "Compensation of Directors" and the paragraphs under
the heading "Executive Compensation" (other than the paragraphs under the
heading "Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee Report on Executive
Compensation") of ComEd's 1997 Information Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
The information required by Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to
the stock ownership information under the heading "Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" of ComEd's 1997 Information
Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
None.
28
ANNUAL REPORTS ON FORM 10-K FOR UNICOM CORPORATION AND COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMPANY
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(A)FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS:
PAGE OF
JANUARY 31,
1997 FORM 8-
K REPORT
------------
UNICOM COMED
------ -----
The following financial statements are incorporated into the
Unicom Annual Report on Form 10-K by reference to the indi-
cated page or pages of Unicom's January 31, 1997 Form 8-K
Report, and into the ComEd Annual Report on Form 10-K by
reference to the indicated page or pages of ComEd's January
31, 1997 Form 8-K Report:
Report of Independent Public Accountants.................... 17 16
Statements of Consolidated Income for the years 1996, 1995
and 1994................................................... 18 17
Consolidated Balance Sheets--December 31, 1996 and 1995..... 19-20 18-19
Statements of Consolidated Capitalization--December 31, 1996
and 1995................................................... 21 20
Statements of Consolidated Retained Earnings for the years
1996, 1995 and 1994........................................ 22 21
Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows for the years 1996,
1995 and 1994.............................................. 23 22
Notes to Financial Statements............................... 24-45 23-42
ANNUAL
REPORT ON
PAGE OF FORM 10-K
THIS ------------
DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
-------- ------ -----
The following supplemental schedules are included in
the indicated Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Report of Independent Public Accountants on
Supplemental Schedule.............................. 37 x
Report of Independent Public Accountants on
Supplemental Schedule.............................. 38 x
Schedule II--Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for
each of the three years in the period
ended
December 31, 1996........................ 39 x x
The following schedules are omitted as not applicable or not required
under rules of Regulation S-X: I, III, IV and V.
29
The individual financial statements and schedules of ComEd's
nonconsolidated wholly-owned subsidiaries have been omitted from Unicom's
and ComEd's Annual Report on Form 10-K because the investments are not
material in relation to ComEd's financial position or results of
operations. As of December 31, 1996, the assets of the nonconsolidated
subsidiaries in the aggregate approximated 1% of ComEd's consolidated
assets. The 1996 revenues of the nonconsolidated subsidiaries in the
aggregate were less than 1% of ComEd's consolidated annual revenues.
The following exhibits are filed with the indicated Annual Report on Form
10-K or incorporated therein by reference. Documents indicated by an
asterisk (*) are incorporated by reference to the File No. indicated.
Documents indicated by a plus sign (+) identify management contracts or
compensatory plans or arrangements.
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
*(3)-1 Articles of Incorporation of Unicom effective
January 28,
1994. (File No. 1-11375, Form 10-K for the year
ended
December 31, 1994, Exhibit (3)-1). x
*(3)-2 Restated Articles of Incorporation of ComEd ef-
fective February 20, 1985, including Statements
of Resolution Establishing Series, relating to
the establishment of three new series of ComEd
preference stock known as the "$9.00 Cumulative
Preference Stock," the "$6.875 Cumulative Pref-
erence Stock" and the "$2.425 Cumulative Prefer-
ence Stock." (File No.
1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1994, Exhibit (3)-2). x
(3)-3 By-Laws of Unicom Corporation, effective January
28, 1994 as amended through January 29, 1997. x
(3)-4 By-Laws of Commonwealth Edison Company, effective
September 2, 1988 as amended through January 29,
1997. x
*(4)-1 Mortgage of ComEd to Illinois Merchants Trust
Company, Trustee (Harris Trust and Savings Bank,
as current successor Trustee), dated July 1,
1923, Supplemental Indenture thereto dated Au-
gust 1, 1944, and amendments and supplements
thereto dated, respectively, August 1, 1946,
April 1, 1953, April 1, 1966, November 1, 1966,
December 1, 1966, March 31, 1967, April 1, 1967,
February 1, 1968, July 1, 1968, October 1, 1968,
February 28, 1969, May 29, 1970, January 1,
1971, June 1, 1971, May 31, 1972, June 1, 1973,
June 15, 1973, October 15, 1973, May 31, 1974,
July 1, 1974, June 13, 1975, May 28, 1976, Janu-
ary 15, 1977 and June 3, 1977 (File No. 2-60201,
Form S-7, Exhibit 2-1). x
*(4)-2 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, May 17, 1978, August
31, 1978, June 18, 1979, June 20, 1980, April
16, 1981, April 30, 1982, April 15, 1983, April
13, 1984 and April 15, 1985 (File No. 2-99665,
Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-3). x
*(4)-3 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, April 15, 1986 and May
1, 1986 (File No. 33-6879, Form S-3, Exhibit
(4)-9). x
30
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
*(4)-4 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated January 12, 1987 (File No. 33-13193,
Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-6). x
*(4)-5 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, February 15, 1990 and
June 15, 1990 (File No. 33-38232, Form S-3, Ex-
hibits (4)-11 and (4)-12). x
*(4)-6 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, June 1, 1991, October
1, 1991 and October 15, 1991 (File No. 33-44018,
Form S-3, Exhibits (4)-12, (4)-13 and (4)-14). x
*(4)-7 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated February 1, 1992 (File No. 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991,
Exhibit (4)-18). x
*(4)-8 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated May 15, 1992 (File No. 33-48542, Form
S-3, Exhibit (4)-14). x
*(4)-9 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, July 15, 1992, Septem-
ber 15, 1992 and October 1, 1992 (File No. 33-
53766, Form S-3, Exhibits (4)-13, (4)-14 and
(4)-15). x
*(4)-10 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, February 1, 1993 and
March 1, 1993 (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1992, Exhibits (4)-
14 and (4)-15). x
*(4)-11 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, April 1, 1993 and
April 15, 1993 (File No. 33-64028, Form S-3, Ex-
hibits (4)-12 and (4)-13). x
*(4)-12 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, June 15, 1993 and July
1, 1993 (File No. 1-1839, Form 8-K dated May 21,
1993, Exhibits (4)-1 and (4)-2). x
*(4)-13 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated July 15, 1993 (File No. 1-1839, Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1993, Ex-
hibit (4)-1). x
*(4)-14 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated January 15, 1994 (File No. 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993,
Exhibit (4)-15). x
*(4)-15 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated December 1, 1994 (File No. 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994,
Exhibit (4)-16). x
(4)-16 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated June 1, 1996. x
31
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
*(4)-17 Instrument of Resignation, Appointment and Ac-
ceptance dated January 31, 1996, under the pro-
visions of the Mortgage dated July 1, 1923, and
Indentures Supplemental thereto (File No. 1-
1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1995, Exhibit (4)-28). x
*(4)-18 Instrument dated as of January 31, 1996, for
trustee under the Mortgage dated July 1, 1923
and Indentures Supplemental thereto (File No. 1-
1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1995, Exhibit (4)-29). x
*(4)-19 Indentures of ComEd to The First National Bank of
Chicago, Trustee (Amalgamated Bank of Chicago,
as current successor Trustee), dated April 1,
1949, October 1, 1949, October 1, 1950, October
1, 1954, January 1, 1958, January 1, 1959 and
December 1, 1961 (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1982, Exhibit (4)-
20). x
*(4)-20 Indenture of ComEd dated February 15, 1973 to The
First National Bank of Chicago, Trustee (LaSalle
National Bank, successor Trustee), and Supple-
mental Indenture thereto dated July 13, 1973
(File No. 2-66100, Form S-16, Exhibit (b)-2). x
*(4)-21 Indenture dated as of September 1, 1987 between
ComEd and Citibank, N.A., Trustee relating to
Notes (File No. 33-20619, Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-
13). x
*(4)-22 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated May 18, 1988 (File No. 33-
23036, Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-14). x
*(4)-23 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated July 14, 1989 (File No. 33-
32929, Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-16). x
*(4)-24 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated April 1, 1991 (File No. 33-
44018, Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-21). x
*(4)-25 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated April 15, 1992 (File No. 33-
48542, Form S-3, Exhibit
(4)-22). x
*(4)-26 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated July 15, 1992 (File No. 33-
53766, Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-24). x
*(4)-27 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated October 15, 1993 (File No. 1-
1839, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 1993, Exhibit (4)-1). x
32
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
*(4)-28 Credit Agreement dated as of October 1, 1991,
among Commonwealth Edison Company, as borrower,
the Banks named therein and the other Lenders
from time to time parties thereto, and Citibank,
N.A. (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1991, Exhibit (4)-27). x
*(4)-29 Credit Agreement dated as of October 1, 1991,
among Commonwealth Edison Company, as borrower,
the Banks named therein and the other Lenders
from time to time parties thereto, and Citibank,
N.A. (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1991, Exhibit (4)-28). x
(4)-30 Letter Agreement dated as of September 30, 1996,
among Commonwealth Edison Company and certain of
the Banks party to the Credit Agreement dated as
of October 1, 1991. x
(4)-31 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
November 15, 1996, among Unicom Enterprises
Inc., the Banks Named Therein and Citibank, N.A. x
(4)-32 Amended and Restated Guaranty dated as of Novem-
ber 15, 1996, by Unicom Corporation in favor of
the Lenders and LC Banks parties to the afore-
mentioned Credit Agreement with Unicom Enter-
prises Inc. (included as Exhibit E in Exhibit
(4)-31). x
*(4)-33 Guaranty dated November 22, 1994, by Unicom Cor-
poration in favor of Citibank, N.A. (File No. 1-
11375, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1994, Exhibit (4)-37). x
(4)-34 Indenture dated September 1, 1995 between ComEd
and Wilmington Trust Company. x
(4)-35 First Supplemental Indenture dated September 19,
1995 to Indenture dated September 1, 1995 x
(4)-36 Second Supplemental Indenture dated January 24,
1997 to Indenture dated September 1, 1995. x
*(10)-1 Nuclear Fuel Lease Agreement dated as of November
23, 1993, between CommEd Fuel Company, Inc., as
Lessor, and Commonwealth Edison Company, as Les-
see (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1993, Exhibit (10)-1). x
+*(10)- Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (File
2 No. 1-1839, ComEd Proxy Statement dated March
26, 1993, Exhibit A). x
+*(10)- Amendment to Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incen-
3 tive Plan, effective September 1, 1994 (File No.
33-56991, Form S-8, Exhibit (4)-4). x
+*(10)- 1994 Long-Term Performance Unit Award for Execu-
4 tive and Group Level Employees Payable in 1997
under the 1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan (File
No. 1-1839, Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended De-
cember 31, 1993, Exhibit (10)-5). x x
33
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
+*(10)- 1995 Long-Term Performance Unit Award for Execu-
5 tive and Group Level Employees Payable in 1998
under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive
Plan, as amended (File No. 1-11375 and 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995,
Exhibit (10)-6). x x
+*(10)- 1996 Long-Term Performance Unit Award for Execu-
6 tive and Group Level Employees Payable in 1999
under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive
Plan (File Nos. 1-11375 and 1-1839, Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1995, Exhibit
(10)-9). x x
+*(10)-7 1996 Variable Compensation Award for Management
Employees under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term
Incentive Plan (File Nos. 1-11375 and 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995,
Exhibit (10)-10). x x
+*(10)-8 1996 Award to Mr. O'Connor, Mr. Mullin and Mr.
Skinner under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term
Incentive Plan (File Nos. 1-11375 and 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995,
Exhibit (10)-11). x x
+ (10)-9 Unicom Corporation General Provisions Regarding
1996 Stock Option Awards Granted under the
Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan. x x
+ (10)- Unicom Corporation General Provisions Regarding
10 1996B Stock Option Awards Granted under the
Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan. x x
+ (10)- 1997 Long-Term Performance Unit Award for Execu-
11 tive and Group Level Employees Payable in 2000
under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive
Plan. x x
+ (10)- 1997 Annual Incentive Award for Managment Employ-
12 ees under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term In-
centive Plan. x x
+ (10)- 1997 Award to Mr. O'Connor, Mr. Mullin and Mr.
13 Skinner under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term
Incentive Plan. x x
+*(10)- Unicom Corporation Deferred Compensation Unit
14 Plan, as amended (File Nos. 1-11375 and 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995,
Exhibit (10)-12). x x
+*(10)- Deferred Compensation Plan (included in Article
15 Five of Exhibit (3)-2 above). x
+*(10)- Management Incentive Compensation Plan, effective
16 January 1, 1989 (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1988, Exhibit (10)-
4). x
+*(10)- Amendments to Management Incentive Compensation
17 Plan, dated December 14, 1989 and March 21, 1990
(File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1989, Exhibit (10)-5). x
+*(10)- Amendment to Management Incentive Compensation
18 Plan, dated March 21, 1991 (File No. 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991,
Exhibit (10)-6). x
34
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
+ (10)- Retirement Plan for Directors, effective Septem-
19 ber 1, 1994, as amended through March 12, 1997. x
+ (10)- Retirement Plan for Directors, effective January
20 1, 1987, as amended through March 12, 1997. x
+*(10)- Unicom Corporation 1996 Directors' Fee Plan (File
21 No. 1-11375, Unicom Proxy Statement dated April
8, 1996, Appendix A). x x
+*(10)- Executive Group Life Insurance Plan (File No. 1-
22 1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1980, Exhibit (10)-3). x
+*(10)- Amendment to the Executive Group Life Insurance
23 Plan (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1981, Exhibit (10)-4). x
+*(10)- Amendment to the Executive Group Life Insurance
24 Plan dated December 12, 1986 (File No. 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1986,
Exhibit (10)-6). x
+*(10)- Amendment of Executive Group Life Insurance Plan
25 to implement program of "split dollar life in-
surance" dated December 13, 1990 (File No. 1-
1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1990, Exhibit (10)-10). x
+*(10)- Commonwealth Edison Company Supplemental Manage-
26 ment Retirement Plan (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1985, Exhibit
(10)-6). x
+*(10)- Amendment of Executive Group Life Insurance Plan
27 to stabilize the death benefit applicable to
participants dated July 22, 1992 (File No. 1-
1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1992, Exhibit (10)-13). x
+*(10)- Letter Agreement dated December 16, 1992 between
28 Com-
monwealth Edison Company and Samuel K. Skinner
(File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1992, Exhibit (10)-14). x
+*(10)- Amendment dated May 31, 1995 to Letter Agreement
29 dated December 16, 1992 between Commonwealth Ed-
ison Company and Samuel K. Skinner (File No.
1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995, Exhibit (10)-27). x
+ (10)- Amendments dated December 11, 1996 and March 24,
30 1997 to Letter Agreement dated December 16, 1992
between Commonwealth Edison Company and Samuel
K. Skinner. x
+*(10)- Letter Agreement dated November 14, 1995 between
31 Commonwealth Edison Company and Leo F. Mullin
(File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995, Exhibit (10)-28). x
+ (10)- Amendment dated March 24, 1997 to Letter Agree-
32 ment dated November 14, 1995 between Common-
wealth Edison Company and Leo F. Mullin. x
+*(10)- Commonwealth Edison Company Excess Benefit Sav-
33 ings Plan (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1994, Exhibit (10)-2). x
35
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
+*(10)- Amendment No. 1 to Commonwealth Edison Company
34 Excess Benefit Savings Plan dated May 24, 1995
(File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995, Exhibit (10)-30). x
+*(10)- Unicom Corporation Stock Bonus Deferral Plan
35 (File Nos. 1-11375 and 1-1839, Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1995, Exhibit (10)-31). x x
(12) Statement re computation of ratios of earnings to
fixed charges and ratios of earnings to fixed
charges and preferred and preference stock divi-
dend requirements for ComEd. x
(21)-1 Subsidiaries of Unicom Corporation. x
(21)-2 Subsidiaries of Commonwealth Edison Company. x
(23)-1 Consent of experts for Unicom Corporation. x
(23)-2 Consent of experts for Commonwealth Edison Compa-
ny. x
(24)-1 Powers of attorney of Directors whose names are
signed to the Unicom Corporation Annual Report
on Form 10-K pursuant to such powers. x
(24)-2 Powers of attorney of Directors whose names are
signed to the Commonwealth Edison Company Annual
Report on Form
10-K pursuant to such powers. x
(99)-1 Unicom Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated January 31, 1997. x
(99)-2 Commonwealth Edison Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated January 31, 1997. x
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Unicom and ComEd
hereby agree to furnish to the SEC, upon request, any instrument
defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of ComEd not filed as
an exhibit herein. No such instrument authorizes securities in excess
of 10% of the total assets of ComEd.
(B) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K:
None.
36
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ON SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE
To Unicom Corporation:
We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards,
the consolidated financial statements of Unicom Corporation and subsidiary
companies incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and
have issued our report thereon dated January 31, 1997.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in Item 14.(a), is
presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This
schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits
of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all
material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
Arthur Andersen LLP
Chicago, Illinois
January 31, 1997
37
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
ON SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE
To Commonwealth Edison Company:
We have audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards,
the consolidated financial statements of Commonwealth Edison Company and
subsidiary companies incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, and have issued our report thereon dated January 31, 1997.
Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
financial statements taken as a whole. The schedule listed in Item 14.(a), is
presented for purposes of complying with the Securities and Exchange
Commission's rules and is not part of the basic financial statements. This
schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits
of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, fairly states in all
material respects the financial data required to be set forth therein in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole.
Arthur Andersen LLP
Chicago, Illinois
January 31, 1997
38
SCHEDULE II
UNICOM CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
SCHEDULE II--VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS)
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
COLUMN A COLUMN B COLUMN C COLUMN D COLUMN E
- ---------------------------- --------- ------------------ ---------- --------
ADDITIONS
------------------
BALANCE CHARGED
AT TO COSTS CHARGED BALANCE
BEGINNING AND TO OTHER AT END
DESCRIPTION OF YEAR EXPENSES ACCOUNTS DEDUCTIONS OF YEAR
- ---------------------------- --------- -------- -------- ---------- --------
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1994
- ----------------------------
Reserve Deducted From Assets
in Consolidated Balance
Sheet:
Provision for uncollectible
accounts (a).............. $10,910 $ (190) $ -- $ -- $10,720
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
Estimated Obsolete Materi-
als....................... $13,066 $13,650 $ -- $(13,026)(b) $13,690
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
Other Reserves:
Estimated liabilities asso-
ciated with remediation
costs and former manufac-
tured gas plant sites..... $29,522 $ 5,039 $ -- $ (2,039)(c) $32,522
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
Accumulated provision for
injuries and damages...... $56,734 $20,270 $7,802 $(29,494)(d) $55,312
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1995
- ----------------------------
Reserve Deducted From Assets
in Consolidated Balance
Sheet:
Provision for uncollectible
accounts (a).............. $10,720 $ 1,108 $ -- $ -- $11,828
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
Estimated Obsolete Materi-
als....................... $13,690 $15,350 $ -- $(12,865)(b) $16,175
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
Other Reserves:
Estimated liabilities asso-
ciated with remediation
costs and former manufac-
tured gas plant sites..... $32,522 $ 2,271 $ -- $ (2,271)(c) $32,522
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
Accumulated provision for
injuries and damages...... $55,312 $21,135 $4,671 $(23,142)(d) $57,976
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1996
- ----------------------------
Reserve Deducted From Assets
in Consolidated Balance
Sheet:
Provision for uncollectible
accounts (a).............. $11,828 $ 1,065 $ -- $ -- $12,893
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
Estimated Obsolete Materi-
als....................... $16,175 $12,000 $ -- $(15,873)(b) $12,302
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
Other Reserves:
Estimated liabilities asso-
ciated with remediation
costs and former manufac-
tured gas plant sites..... $32,522 $ 1,706 $ -- $ (1,706)(c) $32,522
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
Accumulated provision for
injuries and damages...... $57,976 $13,325 $3,280 $(20,609)(d) $53,972
======= ======= ====== ======== =======
Notes:
(a) Bad debt losses, net of recoveries, and provisions for uncollectible
accounts were charged to operating expense and amounted to $25,287,000,
$26,278,000 and $41,846,000 in 1994, 1995 and 1996, respectively.
(b) Writeoff of obsolete materials.
(c) Expenditures for site investigation and cleanup costs.
(d) Payments of claims and related costs.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
39
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS
REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY
AUTHORIZED, IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO AND STATE OF ILLINOIS ON THE 28TH
DAY OF MARCH 1997.
UNICOM CORPORATION
James J. O'Connor
By_____________________________
James J. O'Connor, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
THIS REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF
OF THE REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES INDICATED ON THE 28TH DAY OF
MARCH 1997.
SIGNATURE
- ----------------------------
TITLE
---------------------
James J. O'Connor Chairman and Chief
- ---------------------------- Executive Officer and
James J. O'Connor Director (principal
executive officer)
John C. Bukovski
- ---------------------------- Vice President (principal
John C. Bukovski financial officer)
Roger F. Kovack Comptroller (principal
- ---------------------------- accounting officer)
Roger F. Kovack
Jean Allard* Director
Edward A. Brennan* Director
James W. Compton* Director
Bruce DeMars* Director
Sue L. Gin* Director
Donald P. Jacobs Director
Edgar D. Jannotta Director
George E. Johnson* Director
Edward A. Mason* Director
Leo F. Mullin* Vice Chairman and
Frank A. Olson Director
Director
Samuel K. Skinner* President and Director
David A. Scholz
*By____________________________
David A. Scholz, Attorney-in-
fact
[Signature page to Unicom Corporation Annual Report on Form 10-K]
40
SIGNATURES
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS
REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY
AUTHORIZED, IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO AND STATE OF ILLINOIS ON THE 28TH
DAY OF MARCH 1997.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
James J. O'Connor
By_____________________________
James J. O'Connor, Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
THIS REPORT HAS BEEN SIGNED BELOW BY THE FOLLOWING PERSONS ON BEHALF
OF THE REGISTRANT AND IN THE CAPACITIES INDICATED ON THE 28TH DAY OF
MARCH 1997.
SIGNATURE
- ----------------------------
TITLE
---------------------
James J. O'Connor Chairman and Chief
- ---------------------------- Executive Officer and
James J. O'Connor Director (principal
executive officer)
John C. Bukovski
- ---------------------------- Vice President (principal
John C. Bukovski financial officer)
Roger F. Kovack Comptroller (principal
- ---------------------------- accounting officer)
Roger F. Kovack
Jean Allard* Director
Edward A. Brennan* Director
James W. Compton* Director
Bruce DeMars* Director
Sue L. Gin* Director
Donald P. Jacobs* Director
Edgar D. Jannotta Director
George E. Johnson* Director
Edward A. Mason* Director
Leo F. Mullin* Vice Chairman and
Frank A. Olson Director
Director
Samuel K. Skinner* President and Director
David A. Scholz
*By____________________________
David A. Scholz, Attorney-in-
fact
[Signature page to Commonwealth Edison Company Annual Report on Form 10-K]
41
UNICOM CORPORATION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
FILE NO.'S 1-11375
AND 1-1839
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following exhibits are filed with the indicated Annual Report on Form
10-K or incorporated therein by reference. Documents indicated by an
asterisk (*) are incorporated by reference to the File No. indicated.
Documents indicated by a plus sign (+) identify management contracts or
compensatory plans or arrangements.
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
*(3)-1 Articles of Incorporation of Unicom effective
January 28,
1994. (File No. 1-11375, Form 10-K for the year
ended
December 31, 1994, Exhibit (3)-1). x
*(3)-2 Restated Articles of Incorporation of ComEd ef-
fective February 20, 1985, including Statements
of Resolution Establishing Series, relating to
the establishment of three new series of ComEd
preference stock known as the "$9.00 Cumulative
Preference Stock," the "$6.875 Cumulative Pref-
erence Stock" and the "$2.425 Cumulative Prefer-
ence Stock." (File No.
1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 1994, Exhibit (3)-2). x
(3)-3 By-Laws of Unicom Corporation, effective January
28, 1994 as amended through January 29, 1997. x
(3)-4 By-Laws of Commonwealth Edison Company, effective
September 2, 1988 as amended through January 29,
1997. x
*(4)-1 Mortgage of ComEd to Illinois Merchants Trust
Company, Trustee (Harris Trust and Savings Bank,
as current successor Trustee), dated July 1,
1923, Supplemental Indenture thereto dated Au-
gust 1, 1944, and amendments and supplements
thereto dated, respectively, August 1, 1946,
April 1, 1953, April 1, 1966, November 1, 1966,
December 1, 1966, March 31, 1967, April 1, 1967,
February 1, 1968, July 1, 1968, October 1, 1968,
February 28, 1969, May 29, 1970, January 1,
1971, June 1, 1971, May 31, 1972, June 1, 1973,
June 15, 1973, October 15, 1973, May 31, 1974,
July 1, 1974, June 13, 1975, May 28, 1976, Janu-
ary 15, 1977 and June 3, 1977 (File No. 2-60201,
Form S-7, Exhibit 2-1). x
*(4)-2 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, May 17, 1978, August
31, 1978, June 18, 1979, June 20, 1980, April
16, 1981, April 30, 1982, April 15, 1983, April
13, 1984 and April 15, 1985 (File No. 2-99665,
Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-3). x
*(4)-3 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, April 15, 1986 and May
1, 1986 (File No. 33-6879, Form S-3, Exhibit
(4)-9). x
1
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
*(4)-4 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated January 12, 1987 (File No. 33-13193,
Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-6). x
*(4)-5 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, February 15, 1990 and
June 15, 1990 (File No. 33-38232, Form S-3, Ex-
hibits (4)-11 and (4)-12). x
*(4)-6 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, June 1, 1991, October
1, 1991 and October 15, 1991 (File No. 33-44018,
Form S-3, Exhibits (4)-12, (4)-13 and (4)-14). x
*(4)-7 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated February 1, 1992 (File No. 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991,
Exhibit (4)-18). x
*(4)-8 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated May 15, 1992 (File No. 33-48542, Form
S-3, Exhibit (4)-14). x
*(4)-9 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, July 15, 1992, Septem-
ber 15, 1992 and October 1, 1992 (File No. 33-
53766, Form S-3, Exhibits (4)-13, (4)-14 and
(4)-15). x
*(4)-10 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, February 1, 1993 and
March 1, 1993 (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1992, Exhibits (4)-
14 and (4)-15). x
*(4)-11 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, April 1, 1993 and
April 15, 1993 (File No. 33-64028, Form S-3, Ex-
hibits (4)-12 and (4)-13). x
*(4)-12 Supplemental Indentures to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated, respectively, June 15, 1993 and July
1, 1993 (File No. 1-1839, Form 8-K dated May 21,
1993, Exhibits (4)-1 and (4)-2). x
*(4)-13 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated July 15, 1993 (File No. 1-1839, Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1993, Ex-
hibit (4)-1). x
*(4)-14 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated January 15, 1994 (File No. 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993,
Exhibit (4)-15). x
*(4)-15 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated December 1, 1994 (File No. 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994,
Exhibit (4)-16). x
(4)-16 Supplemental Indenture to Mortgage dated July 1,
1923 dated June 1, 1996. x
2
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
*(4)-17 Instrument of Resignation, Appointment and Ac-
ceptance dated January 31, 1996, under the pro-
visions of the Mortgage dated July 1, 1923, and
Indentures Supplemental thereto (File No. 1-
1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1995, Exhibit (4)-28). x
*(4)-18 Instrument dated as of January 31, 1996, for
trustee under the Mortgage dated July 1, 1923
and Indentures Supplemental thereto (File No. 1-
1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1995, Exhibit (4)-29). x
*(4)-19 Indentures of ComEd to The First National Bank of
Chicago, Trustee (Amalgamated Bank of Chicago,
as current successor Trustee), dated April 1,
1949, October 1, 1949, October 1, 1950, October
1, 1954, January 1, 1958, January 1, 1959 and
December 1, 1961 (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1982, Exhibit (4)-
20). x
*(4)-20 Indenture of ComEd dated February 15, 1973 to The
First National Bank of Chicago, Trustee (LaSalle
National Bank, successor Trustee), and Supple-
mental Indenture thereto dated July 13, 1973
(File No. 2-66100, Form S-16, Exhibit (b)-2). x
*(4)-21 Indenture dated as of September 1, 1987 between
ComEd and Citibank, N.A., Trustee relating to
Notes (File No. 33-20619, Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-
13). x
*(4)-22 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated May 18, 1988 (File No. 33-
23036, Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-14). x
*(4)-23 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated July 14, 1989 (File No. 33-
32929, Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-16). x
*(4)-24 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated April 1, 1991 (File No. 33-
44018, Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-21). x
*(4)-25 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated April 15, 1992 (File No. 33-
48542, Form S-3, Exhibit
(4)-22). x
*(4)-26 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated July 15, 1992 (File No. 33-
53766, Form S-3, Exhibit (4)-24). x
*(4)-27 Supplemental Indenture to Indenture dated Septem-
ber 1, 1987 dated October 15, 1993 (File No. 1-
1839, Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 1993, Exhibit (4)-1). x
3
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
*(4)-28 Credit Agreement dated as of October 1, 1991,
among Commonwealth Edison Company, as borrower,
the Banks named therein and the other Lenders
from time to time parties thereto, and Citibank,
N.A. (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1991, Exhibit (4)-27). x
*(4)-29 Credit Agreement dated as of October 1, 1991,
among Commonwealth Edison Company, as borrower,
the Banks named therein and the other Lenders
from time to time parties thereto, and Citibank,
N.A. (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1991, Exhibit (4)-28). x
(4)-30 Letter Agreement dated as of September 30, 1996,
among Commonwealth Edison Company and certain of
the Banks party to the Credit Agreement dated as
of October 1, 1991. x
(4)-31 Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of
November 15, 1996, among Unicom Enterprises
Inc., the Banks Named Therein and Citibank, N.A. x
(4)-32 Amended and Restated Guaranty dated as of Novem-
ber 15, 1996, by Unicom Corporation in favor of
the Lenders and LC Banks parties to the afore-
mentioned Credit Agreement with Unicom Enter-
prises Inc. (included as Exhibit E in Exhibit
(4)-31). x
*(4)-33 Guaranty dated November 22, 1994, by Unicom Cor-
poration in favor of Citibank, N.A. (File No. 1-
11375, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1994, Exhibit (4)-37). x
(4)-34 Indenture dated September 1, 1995 between ComEd
and Wilmington Trust Company. x
(4)-35 First Supplemental Indenture dated September 19,
1995 to Identure dated September 1, 1995. x
(4)-36 Second Supplemental Indenture dated January 24,
1997 to Indenture dated September 1, 1995. x
*(10)-1 Nuclear Fuel Lease Agreement dated as of November
23, 1993, between ComEd Fuel Company, Inc., as
Lessor, and Commonwealth Edison Company, as Les-
see (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1993, Exhibit (10)-1). x
+*(10)- Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan (File
2 No. 1-1839, ComEd Proxy Statement dated March
26, 1993, Exhibit A). x
+*(10)- Amendment to Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incen-
3 tive Plan, effective September 1, 1994 (File No.
33-56991, Form S-8, Exhibit (4)-4). x
4
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
+*(10)- 1994 Long-Term Performance Unit Award for Execu-
4 tive and Group Level Employees Payable in 1997
under the 1993 Long-Term Incentive Plan (File
No. 1-1839, Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended De-
cember 31, 1993, Exhibit (10)-5). x x
+*(10)- 1995 Long-Term Performance Unit Award for Execu-
5 tive and Group Level Employees Payable in 1998
under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive
Plan, as amended (File No. 1-11375 and 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995,
Exhibit (10)-6). x x
+*(10)- 1996 Long-Term Performance Unit Award for Execu-
6 tive and Group Level Employees Payable in 1999
under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive
Plan (File Nos. 1-11375 and 1-1839, Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1995, Exhibit
(10)-9). x x
+*(10)-7 1996 Variable Compensation Award for Management
Employees under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term
Incentive Plan (File Nos. 1-11375 and 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995,
Exhibit (10)-10). x x
+*(10)-8 1996 Award to Mr. O'Connor, Mr. Mullin and Mr.
Skinner under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term
Incentive Plan (File Nos. 1-11375 and 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995,
Exhibit (10)-11). x x
+ (10)-9 Unicom Corporation General Provisions Regarding
1996 Stock Option Awards Granted under the
Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan. x x
+ (10)- Unicom Corporation General Provisions Regarding
10 1996B Stock Option Awards Granted under the
Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive Plan. x x
+ (10)- 1997 Long-Term Performance Unit Award for Execu-
11 tive and Group Level Employees Payable in 2000
under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term Incentive
Plan. x x
+ (10)- 1997 Annual Incentive Award for Managment Employ-
12 ees under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term In-
centive Plan. x x
+ (10)- 1997 Award to Mr. O'Connor, Mr. Mullin and Mr.
13 Skinner under the Unicom Corporation Long-Term
Incentive Plan. x x
+*(10)- Unicom Corporation Deferred Compensation Unit
14 Plan, as amended (File Nos. 1-11375 and 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995,
Exhibit (10)-12). x x
+*(10)- Deferred Compensation Plan (included in Article
15 Five of Exhibit (3)-2 above). x
+*(10)- Management Incentive Compensation Plan, effective
16 January 1, 1989 (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1988, Exhibit (10)-
4). x
+*(10)- Amendments to Management Incentive Compensation
17 Plan, dated December 14, 1989 and March 21, 1990
(File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1989, Exhibit (10)-5). x
5
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
+*(10)- Amendment to Management Incentive Compensation
18 Plan, dated March 21, 1991 (File No. 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991,
Exhibit (10)-6). x
+ (10)- Retirement Plan for Directors, effective Septem-
19 ber 1, 1994, as amended through March 12, 1997. x
+ (10)- Retirement Plan for Directors, effective January
20 1, 1987, as amended through March 12, 1997. x
+*(10)- Unicom Corporation 1996 Directors' Fee Plan (File
21 No. 1-11375, Unicom Proxy Statement dated April
8, 1996, Appendix A). x x
+*(10)- Executive Group Life Insurance Plan (File No. 1-
22 1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1980, Exhibit (10)-3). x
+*(10)- Amendment to the Executive Group Life Insurance
23 Plan (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1981, Exhibit (10)-4). x
+*(10)- Amendment to the Executive Group Life Insurance
24 Plan dated December 12, 1986 (File No. 1-1839,
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1986,
Exhibit (10)-6). x
+*(10)- Amendment of Executive Group Life Insurance Plan
25 to implement program of "split dollar life in-
surance" dated December 13, 1990 (File No. 1-
1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1990, Exhibit (10)-10). x
+*(10)- Commonwealth Edison Company Supplemental Manage-
26 ment Retirement Plan (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1985, Exhibit
(10)-6). x
+*(10)- Amendment of Executive Group Life Insurance Plan
27 to stabilize the death benefit applicable to
participants dated July 22, 1992 (File No. 1-
1839, Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1992, Exhibit (10)-13). x
+*(10)- Letter Agreement dated December 16, 1992 between
28 Com-
monwealth Edison Company and Samuel K. Skinner
(File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1992, Exhibit (10)-14). x
+*(10)- Amendment dated May 31, 1995 to Letter Agreement
29 dated December 16, 1992 between Commonwealth Ed-
ison Company and Samuel K. Skinner (File No.
1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995, Exhibit (10)-27). x
+ (10)- Amendments dated December 11, 1996 and March 24,
30 1997 to Letter Agreement dated December 16, 1992
between Commonwealth Edison Company and Samuel
K. Skinner. x
+*(10)- Letter Agreement dated November 14, 1995 between
31 Commonwealth Edison Company and Leo F. Mullin
(File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995, Exhibit (10)-28). x
+ (10)- Amendment dated March 24, 1997 to Letter Agree-
32 ment dated November 14, 1995 between Common-
wealth Edison Company and Leo F. Mullin. x
6
EXHIBIT
NUMBER DESCRIPTION OF DOCUMENT UNICOM COMED
------- ------------------------------------------------- ------ -----
+*(10)- Commonwealth Edison Company Excess Benefit Sav-
33 ings Plan (File No. 1-1839, Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1994, Exhibit (10)-2). x
+*(10)- Amendment No. 1 to Commonwealth Edison Company
34 Excess Benefit Savings Plan dated May 24, 1995
(File No. 1-1839, Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995, Exhibit (10)-30). x
+*(10)- Unicom Corporation Stock Bonus Deferral Plan
35 (File Nos. 1-11375 and 1-1839, Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 1995, Exhibit (10)-31). x x
(12) Statement re computation of ratios of earnings to
fixed charges and ratios of earnings to fixed
charges and preferred and preference stock divi-
dend requirements for ComEd. x
(21)-1 Subsidiaries of Unicom Corporation. x
(21)-2 Subsidiaries of Commonwealth Edison Company. x
(23)-1 Consent of experts for Unicom Corporation. x
(23)-2 Consent of experts for Commonwealth Edison Compa-
ny. x
(24)-1 Powers of attorney of Directors whose names are
signed to the Unicom Corporation Annual Report
on Form 10-K pursuant to such powers. x
(24)-2 Powers of attorney of Directors whose names are
signed to the Commonwealth Edison Company Annual
Report on Form
10-K pursuant to such powers. x
(99)-1 Unicom Corporation's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated January 31, 1997. x
(99)-2 Commonwealth Edison Company's Current Report on
Form 8-K dated January 31, 1997. x
Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Unicom and ComEd
hereby agree to furnish to the SEC, upon request, any instrument
defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of ComEd not filed as
an exhibit herein. No such instrument authorizes securities in excess
of 10% of the total assets of ComEd.
7