Back to GetFilings.com
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
x QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended: June 30, 2002
Commission File Number: 0-22333
Nanophase Technologies Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
| Delaware (State or other
jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
36-3687863 (I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.) |
1319 Marquette Drive, Romeoville, Illinois 60446
(Address of principal executive offices, and zip code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (630) 771-6708
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
X No
As of August 13, 2002, there were outstanding
15,106,032 shares of common stock, par value $.01, of the registrant.
QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
INDEX
| |
|
Page
|
| |
|
3 |
| |
|
3 |
| |
|
3 |
| |
|
4 |
| |
|
5 |
| |
|
6 |
| |
|
8 |
| |
|
11 |
| |
| |
|
12 |
| |
|
12 |
| |
|
12 |
| |
|
12 |
| |
|
13 |
| |
|
13 |
| |
| |
|
14 |
2
Item 1. Financial Statements
NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
| |
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
| ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
530,965 |
|
|
$ |
582,579 |
|
| Investments |
|
|
10,175,857 |
|
|
|
6,842,956 |
|
| Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $25,000 at June 30, 2002 and December 31,
2001 |
|
|
1,043,149 |
|
|
|
1,112,952 |
|
| Other receivable, net |
|
|
74,006 |
|
|
|
67,449 |
|
| Inventories, net |
|
|
776,815 |
|
|
|
956,268 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
295,429 |
|
|
|
381,696 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total current assets |
|
|
12,896,221 |
|
|
|
9,943,900 |
|
| Equipment and leasehold improvements, net |
|
|
9,090,981 |
|
|
|
8,914,745 |
|
| Other assets, net |
|
|
349,596 |
|
|
|
325,743 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
22,336,798 |
|
|
$ |
19,184,388 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
629,854 |
|
|
$ |
714,135 |
|
| Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
59,238 |
|
|
|
48,352 |
|
| Accounts payable |
|
|
584,959 |
|
|
|
1,233,466 |
|
| Accrued expenses |
|
|
1,223,670 |
|
|
|
732,427 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,497,721 |
|
|
|
2,728,380 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Long-term debt, less current maturities |
|
|
553,812 |
|
|
|
758,490 |
|
| Long-term portion of capital lease obligations, less current maturities |
|
|
66,970 |
|
|
|
53,900 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
620,782 |
|
|
|
812,390 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Contingent liabilities |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 24,088 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
| Common stock, $.01 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 15,106,032 and 13,705,931 shares issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively |
|
|
151,060 |
|
|
|
137,059 |
|
| Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
56,568,815 |
|
|
|
50,260,747 |
|
| Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(37,501,580 |
) |
|
|
(34,754,188 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total stockholders’ equity |
|
|
19,218,295 |
|
|
|
15,643,618 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
22,336,798 |
|
|
$ |
19,184,388 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
3
NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
| |
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
| |
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
| Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Product revenue |
|
$ |
1,516,197 |
|
|
$ |
957,314 |
|
|
$ |
2,829,773 |
|
|
$ |
1,937,489 |
|
| Other revenue |
|
|
145,649 |
|
|
|
92,065 |
|
|
|
239,755 |
|
|
|
183,815 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total revenue |
|
|
1,661,846 |
|
|
|
1,049,379 |
|
|
|
3,069,528 |
|
|
|
2,121,304 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Operating expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cost of revenue |
|
|
1,401,696 |
|
|
|
1,006,749 |
|
|
|
2,696,720 |
|
|
|
1,857,122 |
|
| Research and development expense |
|
|
480,042 |
|
|
|
362,519 |
|
|
|
1,003,726 |
|
|
|
800,189 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
1,006,104 |
|
|
|
1,090,995 |
|
|
|
2,091,319 |
|
|
|
2,226,949 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total operating expense |
|
|
2,887,842 |
|
|
|
2,460,263 |
|
|
|
5,791,765 |
|
|
|
4,884,260 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loss from operations |
|
|
(1,225,996 |
) |
|
|
(1,410,884 |
) |
|
|
(2,722,237 |
) |
|
|
(2,762,956 |
) |
| Interest income |
|
|
33,041 |
|
|
|
165,436 |
|
|
|
61,177 |
|
|
|
416,616 |
|
| Interest expense |
|
|
(28,792 |
) |
|
|
(8,272 |
) |
|
|
(56,282 |
) |
|
|
(17,664 |
) |
| Other, net |
|
|
(951 |
) |
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Loss before provision for income taxes |
|
|
(1,222,698 |
) |
|
|
(1,256,720 |
) |
|
|
(2,717,392 |
) |
|
|
(2,376,004 |
) |
| Provisions for income taxes |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net loss |
|
$ |
(1,252,698 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,286,720 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,747,392 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,406,004 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net loss per share—basic and diluted |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.20 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.18 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding |
|
|
14,232,786 |
|
|
|
13,643,771 |
|
|
|
13,980,694 |
|
|
|
13,628,562 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial
Statements.
4
NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
| |
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
| |
|
2002
|
|
|
2001
|
|
| Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net loss |
|
$ |
(2,747,392 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,406,004 |
) |
| Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
569,170 |
|
|
|
379,755 |
|
| Allowance for excess inventory quantities |
|
|
25,019 |
|
|
|
(12,172 |
) |
| Provision for asset write-down |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14,086 |
|
| Changes in assets and liabilities related to operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
69,803 |
|
|
|
696,788 |
|
| Other receivable |
|
|
(6,557 |
) |
|
|
51,352 |
|
| Inventories |
|
|
154,434 |
|
|
|
(1,129,513 |
) |
| Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
54,783 |
|
|
|
25,072 |
|
| Accounts payable |
|
|
62,261 |
|
|
|
758,945 |
|
| Accrued liabilities |
|
|
491,243 |
|
|
|
3,189 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash (used in) operating activities |
|
|
(1,327,236 |
) |
|
|
(1,618,502 |
) |
| Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Acquisition of equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
(573,964 |
) |
|
|
(3,821,301 |
) |
| Purchases of held-to-maturity investments |
|
|
(55,698,953 |
) |
|
|
(36,035,911 |
) |
| Maturities of held-to maturity investments |
|
|
52,366,052 |
|
|
|
41,083,299 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
|
|
(3,906,865 |
) |
|
|
1,226,087 |
|
| Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Principal payment on debt obligations, including capital leases |
|
|
(305,758 |
) |
|
|
(153,259 |
) |
| Proceeds from borrowings |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
782,333 |
|
| Proceeds from sale of common stock, net, and exercise of stock options |
|
|
6,322,069 |
|
|
|
285,370 |
|
| Payments of accounts payable incurred for the purchase of equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
(833,824 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
5,182,487 |
|
|
|
914,444 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(51,614 |
) |
|
|
522,029 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
582,579 |
|
|
|
473,036 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
530,965 |
|
|
$ |
995,065 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Interest paid |
|
$ |
56,282 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Income taxes paid |
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Supplemental non-cash investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Capital lease obligations incurred for use of equipment |
|
$ |
40,755 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Accounts payable incurred for the purchase of equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
$ |
123,056 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Financial Statements.
5
NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
(Unaudited)
(1) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements
of Nanophase Technologies Corporation (the “Company”) reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and operating
results of the Company for the interim periods presented. Operating results for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2002.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and
notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2001, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(2) Description of Business
The Company was incorporated on November 30, 1989, for the purpose of developing nanocrystalline materials for commercial production and sale in domestic and international markets.
In the course of its corporate development, the Company has experienced net losses and negative cash flows from operations. Historically,
the Company has funded its operations primarily through the issuance of equity securities.
Revenue from
international sources approximated $303,000 and $625,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
(3)
Investments
Investments are classified by the Company at the time of purchase for appropriate designation and
such designations are reevaluated as of each balance sheet date. The Company’s policy is to classify money market funds and certificates of deposit as investments. Investments are classified as held-to maturity when the Company has the positive
intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity. Held-to maturity securities are stated at amortized costs and are adjusted to maturity for the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Such adjustments for amortization and
accretion are included in interest income.
(4) Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
| |
|
June 30, 2002
|
|
|
December 31, 2001
|
|
| Raw materials |
|
$ |
447,717 |
|
|
$ |
429,393 |
|
| Finished goods |
|
|
985,119 |
|
|
|
1,157,877 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
1,432,836 |
|
|
|
1,587,270 |
|
| Allowance for excess inventory quantities |
|
|
(656,021 |
) |
|
|
(631,002 |
) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
$ |
776,815 |
|
|
$ |
956,268 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(Unaudited)
(5) Stock Options and Warrants
During the six months ended June 30, 2002, 30,101 shares of Common Stock were issued pursuant to exercises of stock options, compared to 99,041 shares of Common Stock in
the same period in 2001. In the same six-month period in 2002 and 2001 no warrants were converted.
(6) Significant Customers
and Contingencies
Revenue from the Company’s largest customer constituted approximately 71% of the
Company’s total revenue for the three- and six-month periods ending June 30, 2002. Amounts included in accounts receivable relating to this particular customer were approximately $715,000 at June 30, 2002. The Company currently has a supply
agreement with its largest customer that has contingencies outlined in it which could potentially result in the license of technology and/or, as provided for in that supply agreement, the sale of production equipment, providing capacity sufficient
to meet the customer’s production needs, from the Company to the customer, if triggered by the Company’s failure to meet certain performance requirements and/or certain financial condition covenants. The financial condition covenants
included in the Company’s supply agreement with the aforementioned customer “triggers” a technology transfer (license or, optionally, an equipment sale) in the event (a) that earnings of the Company for a twelve month period ending
with its most recently published quarterly financial statements are less than zero and its cash, cash equivalents and liquid investments are less than $4,000,000, (b) of an acceleration of any debt maturity having a principal amount of more than
$10,000,000 or (c) the Company’s insolvency, as further defined within the agreement. In the event of an equipment sale relating to a triggering event, the equipment would be sold to the customer at 115% of the equipment’s net book value.
The Company believes that it has complied with all contractual requirements and that it has not had a “triggering event”. The Company further believes that the proceeds of the May 29, 2002 private placement provide sufficient cash balances
to avoid the first triggering event referenced above for at least twelve months. If a triggering event were to occur and our largest customer elected to proceed with the transfer and related sale mentioned above, the Company would receive royalty
payments from its customer for products sold using our technology; however, the Company would lose both significant revenue and the ability to generate significant revenue to replace that which was lost in the near term. Replacement of necessary
equipment that would be purchased and removed by the customer pursuant to this triggering event could take in excess of twelve months. Any additional capital outlays required to rebuild capacity would probably be greater than the proceeds from the
purchase of the assets as dictated by the Company’s agreement with the customer. This shortfall might put the Company in a position where it would be difficult to secure additional funding given an already tenuous cash position. Such an event
would also result in the loss of many of the Company’s key staff and line employees due to economic realities. The Company believes that its employees are a critical component of its success and would be difficult to replace and train quickly.
Given the occurrence of such an event, the Company might not be able to hire and retain skilled employees given the stigma relating to such an event and its impact on the Company. The Company would effectively reduce its size and staffing to a point
where it could remain a going concern. Such a change would make it unlikely that, without unforeseen funding, the Company could continue to grow at anything other than an incremental rate.
(7) Contingent Liabilities
In 1998, Harbour
Court LPI, a small stockholder of the Company, sued the Company, certain of its current and former officers and the underwriters of the Company’s initial public offering of common stock (the “IPO”). The complaint alleged that
defendants had violated the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making supposedly fraudulent material misstatements of fact and omitting to state
7
material facts necessary to prevent other statements from being misleading in connection with soliciting consents to the IPO from certain of the
Company’s preferred stockholders. These supposed misrepresentations concerned purported mischaracterization of revenues the Company received from its then-largest customer. The complaint further alleged that the action should be maintained as a
plaintiff class action on behalf of certain former preferred stockholders whose shares of preferred stock were converted into common stock on or about the date of the IPO. The complaint sought unquantified damages, interest and attorneys’ fees.
In September 2000, each defendant answered the complaint, denying all wrongdoing.
Following certain discovery,
the Company agreed to settle all claims against all defendants in the preferred shareholders’ complaint for $800,000, plus up to an additional $50,000 for the cost of settlement notices and administration. The settlement did not admit liability
by any party. The Court ordered final approval of the settlement in January 2002, and concurrently dismissed with prejudice the preferred shareholders’ complaint. Because the settlement was funded by the Company’s directors and officers
liability insurance, the settlement payment did not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In November 2001, George Tatz, a purchaser of 200 shares of the Company’s common stock, sued the Company and Joseph Cross, its President and CEO. The complaint alleged that defendants violated the
federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by making supposedly fraudulent material misstatements of fact and omitting to state material facts necessary to prevent other statements from being misleading in connection with the Company’s public
disclosures, including certain press releases, concerning the Company’s dealings with Celox, a British customer. The complaint further alleged that the action should be maintained as a plaintiff class action on behalf of certain persons who
purchased shares of the Company’s common stock from April 5, 2001 through October 24, 2001. The complaint sought relief including unquantified compensatory damages, attorneys’ and expert witness’ fees. In December 2001, defendants
moved to dismiss the complaint on various substantive and procedural grounds. Rather than respond to that motion, plaintiff filed an amended complaint in March 2002. The amended complaint alleges that the Company and four of its officers (Joseph
Cross; Daniel Bilicki, its vice president of sales and marketing; Jess Jankowski, its acting chief financial officer; and Gina Kritchevsky, its chief technology officer) are liable under the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for making
supposedly fraudulent material misstatements and omissions of fact in connection with the Company’s press releases, publicly-filed reports and other public disclosures concerning the Company’s dealings with the British customer and the
Company’s purportedly improper booking, and later reversal, of revenue from a one-time sale to that customer. The amended complaint alleges the same putative class and seeks the same relief as in plaintiff’s initial complaint. Defendants
filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint in April 2002. Briefing on that motion was completed on May 31, 2002. To date, the court has not ruled on the motion to dismiss. Although the Company believes that the allegations of the amended
complaint are without merit, it is not feasible to predict at this time the outcome of this litigation or whether its resolution could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.
Overview
Since January 1, 1997, Nanophase Technologies Corporation (the
“Company”) has been engaged in the commercial production and sale of its nanocrystalline materials. All of the Company’s revenue since January 1, 1997 has been generated through commercial sources. From its inception in November 1989
through June 30, 2002, the Company was primarily capitalized through private offerings of approximately $25,758,000 of equity securities and its initial public offering of $28,838,000 of the Company’s common stock (the “Common
Stock”), each net of issuance costs. The Company has incurred cumulative losses of $37,501,580 from inception through June 30, 2002.
8
Results of Operations
Total revenue increased to $1,661,846 for the three months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $1,049,379 for the same period in 2001. Total revenue increased to $3,069,528
for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $2,121,304 for the same period in 2001. Product revenue increased to $1,516,197 for the three months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $957,314 for the same period in 2001. Product revenue increased
to $2,829,773 for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $1,937,489 for the same period in 2001. Increases in total product revenue were attributed to additional customers and growth with existing customers. Other revenue increased to
$145,649 and $239,755 for the three-and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002, compared to $92,065 and $183,815 for the same periods in 2001. The majority of the revenue generated during the three and six months ended June 30, 2002 was from
customers in the healthcare, wear-resistant materials, Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) and catalyst markets. Revenue from the Company’s largest customer constituted approximately 71% of the Company’s total revenue for the three-
and six-month periods ended June 30, 2002. For the three- and six-month periods ended June 30, 2001, the same customer accounted for 46% and 60% of the Company’s total revenue, respectively.
Cost of revenue generally includes costs associated with commercial production and customer development arrangements. Cost of revenue increased to $1,401,696 and
$2,696,720 for the three and six months, respectively, ended June 30, 2002, compared to $1,006,749 and $1,857,122 for the same periods in 2001. The increase in cost of revenue was generally attributed to increased product sales and increased
depreciation expense resulting from the completion, and placement in service at the beginning of the year of the majority of the Company’s build out of its manufacturing and powder coating facilities, somewhat offset by efficiencies in the
manufacture of the Company’s products. Cost of revenue as a percentage of total revenue decreased from 96% for the three months ended June 30, 2001 to 84% for the three months ended June 30, 2002. Cost of revenue as a percentage of total
revenue remained at 88% for the six months ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Improvements to gross profit are primarily due to increased revenues, a more favorable product mix, continued gains in operating efficiencies, and nonrecurring
other revenue in the amount of $65,000 received in the second quarter. The Company expects to remain operating at a positive annual gross profit margin for the foreseeable future.
Research and development expense, which includes all expenses relating to the technology and advanced engineering groups, primarily consists of costs associated with the
Company’s development or acquisition of new product applications and coating formulations and the cost of enhancing the Company’s manufacturing processes. The Company is currently engaged in research to enhance its ability to disperse its
materials in a variety of organic and inorganic media for use as coatings and polishing materials. A recent technical success was related to the Company’s ability to engineer some of its nanomaterials to remain relatively uniformly dispersed in
liquid systems over extended periods of time. The Company’s recent announcement regarding its new CMP partner came about as a direct result of this successful research and subsequent application development. The Company also has an ongoing
advanced engineering effort that is primarily focused on the development of new nanomaterials as well as the refinement of existing nanomaterials. Research and development expense increased to $480,042 and $1,003,726 for the three and six months,
respectively, ended June 30, 2002, compared to $362,519 and $800,189 for the same periods in 2001. The increase in research and development expense was primarily due to no salary expenses currently being capitalized for construction projects and
increased depreciation on assets completed and placed in service during the six months ended June 30, 2002.
Selling, general and administrative expense decreased to $1,006,104 and $2,091,319 for the three- and six-month periods, respectively, ended June 30, 2002, compared to $1,090,995 and $2,226,949 for the same periods in 2001. The net
decrease was primarily attributed to reduced costs of bad debt expense, telephone, consultants, travel, and investor relations costs. These decreases were somewhat
9
offset by increases in salaries and legal expenses.
Interest income decreased to $33,041 and $61,177 for the three- and six-month periods, respectively, ended June 30, 2002, compared to
$165,436 and $416,616 for the same periods in 2001. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in funds available for investment and, to a lesser extent, reduced investment yields.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s cash,
cash equivalents and investments amounted to $10,706,822 at June 30, 2002, compared to $7,425,535 at December 31, 2001. The net cash used in the Company’s operating activities was $1,327,236 for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to
$1,618,502 for the same period in 2001. Net cash used in investing activities, which is due to maturities of securities offset somewhat by capital expenditures and purchases of securities, amounted to $3,906,865 for the six months ended June 30,
2002 compared to $1,226,087 of net cash provided by investing activities for the same period in 2001. Capital expenditures, primarily related to the build out of the Company’s new pilot manufacturing and powder blending facilities within its
Romeoville, Illinois facility and further expansion of the Company’s existing manufacturing facility in Burr Ridge, Illinois and the purchase of related operating equipment, amounted to $697,020, including $123,056 in non-cash items incurred
for accounts payable relating to capital expenditures, for the six months ended June 30, 2002, compared to $3,821,301 for the same period in 2001. Net cash provided by financing activities, is primarily due to the Company securing financing through
a private placement and to a lesser extent by the issuance of shares of common stock pursuant to the exercise of options, somewhat offset by principal payments on debt and capital lease obligations and accounts payable incurred for the purchase of
equipment and leasehold improvements, amounted to $5,182,487 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2002, compared to $914,444 for the same period in 2001.
On May 29, 2002, the Company secured equity funding through a private placement offering. The Company issued 1.37 million shares of additional common stock at $5.00 per share and received gross
proceeds of $6.85 million. Net proceeds were approximately $6.2 million after commissions, legal, accounting, and other costs. The Company intends to use the proceeds to fund expected growth in new markets as well as to provide for expanded working
capital needs expected to arise as sales volume grows. Management expects that the proceeds received from the private placement offering should be sufficient to enable the Company to avoid a “triggering event” relating to the customer
supply agreement, as more fully described in Note 6 of the Company’s financial statements.
The Company
believes that cash from operations and cash on hand, together with the remaining net proceeds from the Company’s initial public offering of Common Stock (“the Offering”), and with its most recent funding received through a private
placement offering, and interest income thereon, will be adequate to fund the Company’s current operating plans. The Company’s actual future capital requirements will depend, however, on many factors, including customer acceptance of the
Company’s current and potential nanocrystalline materials and product applications, continued progress in the Company’s research and development activities and product testing programs, the magnitude of these activities and programs, and
the costs necessary to increase and expand the Company’s manufacturing capabilities and to market and sell the Company’s materials and product applications. Other important issues that will drive future capital requirements will be the
development of new markets and new customers as well as the potential for significant unplanned growth with the Company’s existing customers.
At June 30, 2002, the Company had a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $42.5 million for income tax purposes. Because the Company may have experienced “ownership changes” within
the meaning of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code in connection with its various prior equity
10
offerings, future utilization of this carryforward may be subject to certain limitations as defined by
the Internal Revenue Code. If not utilized, the carryforward expires at various dates between 2005 and 2021. As a result of the annual limitation, a portion of this carryforward may expire before ultimately becoming available to reduce income tax
liabilities. At June 30, 2002, the Company also had a foreign tax credit carryforward of $216,000, which could be used as an offsetting tax credit to reduce U.S. income taxes. The foreign tax credit will expire at various dates between 2017 and 2022
if not utilized before that date.
Should events arise that make it appropriate for the Company to seek additional
financing, it should be noted that additional financing may not be available on acceptable terms or at all, and any such additional financing could be dilutive to the Company’s stockholders. Such a financing could be necessitated by such things
as; the loss of existing customers; currently unknown capital requirements which may be needed to retain existing business or remain competitive in the seeking of new business; new regulatory requirements that are outside the Company’s control;
or various other circumstances coming to pass that are currently not anticipated by the Company.
Safe Harbor Provision
Nanophase Technologies Corporation wants to provide investors with more meaningful and useful information. As
a result, this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) contains and incorporates by reference certain “forward-looking statements”, as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Statements
contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements reflect the
Company’s current expectations regarding its future results of operations, performance, and achievements and are based on information currently available to the Company. The Company has tried, wherever possible, to identify these
forward-looking statements by using words such as “intends,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” and similar expressions. These statements reflect management’s current beliefs and are
based on information now available to it. Accordingly, these statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and contingencies that could cause the Company’s actual results, performance, and achievements in 2002 and beyond to differ
materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such statements. These risks, uncertainties, and factors include, without limitation: uncertain demand for, and acceptance of, the Company’s nanocrystalline materials; the Company’s
dependence on a limited number of key customers; the Company’s limited manufacturing capacity and experience; the Company’s limited marketing experience; changes in development and distribution relationships; the impact of competitive
products and technologies; the Company’s dependence on patents and protection of proprietary information; the resolution of litigation the Company is involved in; and other risks set forth in the Company’s previous filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Except as required by federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to update or
revise these forward-looking statements to reflect new events or uncertainties.
The Company does not
have any material market risk sensitive instruments.
11
See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for additional
information.
On November 26, 1997 (the
“Effective Date”), the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-36937) relating to the Offering was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission. On May 29, 2002, the Company issued 1,370,000 shares
of common stock in a private placement offering, taken collectively with the Company’s November 26, 1997 Offering as “the Offerings.” Since the Effective Date, of its $35,033,231 of net proceeds from the Offerings, the Company has
used approximately $9,707,000 for capital expenditures primarily related to the further expansion of the Company’s existing manufacturing facility and the purchase of operating equipment and approximately $14,619,000 for working capital and
other general corporate purposes. The remainder of the net proceeds has been invested by the Company, pending its use, in short-term, investment grade, interest-bearing obligations.
On May 29, 2002, the Company sold, in a private placement, 1.37 million shares of common stock at $5.00 per share and received gross proceeds of $6.85 million. Net proceeds
were approximately $6.2 million after commissions, legal, accounting, and other costs. The Company intends to use the proceeds to fund expected growth in new markets as well as to provide for expanded working capital needs expected to arise as sales
volume grows.
a)
The 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company was held on June 26, 2002.
b) The stockholders voted to re-elect two Class
II directors to the Company’s Board of Directors. Results of the voting were as follows:
| Directors
|
|
For
|
|
Authority Withheld
|
|
Abstentions
|
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
| Joseph E. Cross |
|
12,054,522 |
|
522,059 |
|
— |
|
— |
| Richard W. Siegel, Ph.D |
|
12,357,255 |
|
219,326 |
|
— |
|
— |
James A. Henderson, James A. McClung, Ph.D, Jerry K. Pearlman, and
Donald S. Perkins continued their terms of office as directors of the Company after the 2002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
c) The stockholders also voted to ratify the appointment by the Company’s Board of Directors of McGladrey & Pullen, LLP as the independent auditors of the Company’s financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2002. Results of the voting were as follows:
| For
|
|
Against
|
|
Abstentions
|
|
Broker Non-Votes
|
| 12,427,441 |
|
45,178 |
|
103,962 |
|
— |
12
None.
Exhibit 10.23*
— Cooperation Agreement dated June 24, 2002 between the Company and Rodel, Inc.
Exhibit
99.1 — CEO Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 99.2 — CFO Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*Confidentiality requested, confidential portions have been omitted and filed separately with the Commission as
required by Rule 24b-2.
The Company did not file any Current Reports on Form 8-K during the second quarter of 2002.
13
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
NANOPHASE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
| |
| Date: August 14, 2002 |
|
By: /s/ JOSEPH E. CROSS |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Joseph E. Cross President, Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and a
Director |
| |
| Date: August 14, 2002 |
|
By: /s/ JESS A. JANKOWSKI |
| |
|
|
| |
|
Jess A. Jankowski Acting Chief Financial Officer, Vice President—Corporate
Controller, Secretary, and Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer) |
14