Back to GetFilings.com






SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

------------------
FORM 10-K
------------------

Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

Commission File Numbers: 333-57285-01
333-57285

Mediacom LLC
Mediacom Capital Corporation*
(Exact names of Registrants as specified in their charters)

New York 06-1433421
New York 06-1513997
(State or other jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer
of Identification Numbers)
incorporation or organization)

100 Crystal Run Road
Middletown, New York 10941
(Address of principal executive offices)

(845) 695-2600
(Registrants' telephone number including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
None

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrants (1) have filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
Registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days:

Yes X No
--- ---
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the Registrants' knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K: Not Applicable

State the aggregate market value of the common equity held by
non-affiliates of the Registrants: Not Applicable

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the Registrants' common
stock: Not Applicable

*Mediacom Capital Corporation meets the conditions set forth in General
Instruction I (1) (a) and (b) of Form 10-K and is therefore filing this form
with the reduced disclosure format.


MEDIACOM LLC
2000 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I
------
Page
----


Item 1. Business.............................................................................. 4
Item 2. Properties............................................................................ 28
Item 3. Legal Proceedings..................................................................... 28
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders................................... 28

PART II
-------

Item 5. Market for Registrants' Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters................. 29
Item 6. Selected Financial Data............................................................... 30
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations............................................................... 34
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk............................ 47
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data........................................... 48
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure................................................................ 70

PART III
--------

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrants................................... 71
Item 11. Executive Compensation................................................................ 73
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management........................ 73
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions........................................ 74

PART IV
-------

Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K....................... 75



2


Mediacom LLC was organized as a New York limited liability company in 1995
and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mediacom Communications Corporation.
Mediacom Capital Corporation was organized as a New York corporation in 1998 and
is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mediacom LLC. Mediacom Capital was formed for
the sole purpose of acting as co-issuer with Mediacom LLC of public debt
securities and does not conduct operations of its own.

References in this Annual Report to "we," "us," or "our" are to Mediacom
LLC and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, unless the context specifies or
requires otherwise. References in this Annual Report to "MCC" are to Mediacom
Communications Corporation.

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

You should carefully review the information contained in this Annual
Report and in other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"). In this Annual Report, we state
our beliefs of future events and of our future financial performance. In some
cases, you can identify those so-called "forward-looking statements" by words
such as "may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes,"
"estimates," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of those
words and other comparable words. You should be aware that those statements are
only our predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. In
evaluating those statements, you should specifically consider various factors,
including the risks discussed in this Annual Report for the year ended December
31, 2000 and other reports or documents that we file from time to time with the
SEC. Those factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any of
our forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements attributable to
us or a person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by
this cautionary statement.


3


PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Introduction

We are currently the ninth largest cable television company in the United
States. We provide our customers with a wide array of broadband services,
including traditional video services, digital television and high-speed Internet
access. As of December 31, 2000, our cable systems passed approximately 1.2
million homes and served approximately 779,000 basic subscribers in 22 states.
We were founded in July 1995 by Rocco B. Commisso, our Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, to acquire and operate cable television systems serving
principally non-metropolitan markets of the United States.

Since commencement of our operations in March 1996, we have experienced
significant growth by deploying a disciplined strategy of acquiring
underperforming cable systems primarily in markets with favorable demographic
profiles. Through December 1998, we completed nine acquisitions of cable systems
that served approximately 362,200 basic subscribers as of December 31, 2000, for
an aggregate purchase price of $432.4 million. In 1999, we completed two
acquisitions of cable systems that served approximately 363,800 basic
subscribers as of December 31, 2000, for an aggregate purchase price of $759.6
million. In 2000, we completed nine acquisitions of cable systems that served
approximately 53,000 basic subscribers as of December 31, 2000, for an aggregate
purchase price of $109.2 million.

We also have generated strong internal growth and improved the operating
and financial performance of our cable systems. These results have been achieved
primarily through the introduction of an expanded array of core cable television
products and services made possible by the rapid upgrade of our cable network.
Assuming all our cable systems were purchased on January 1, 1999, revenues
increased by 9.5%, EBITDA increased by 14.8% and the EBITDA margin improved from
44.7% to 46.9% for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared to the year
ended December 31, 1999. Applying the same assumptions, our internal subscriber
growth was 1.1% for the 12 month period ended December 31, 2000. During these
periods, we also experienced significant increases in operating losses and net
losses. For purposes of this Annual Report, EBITDA is operating income (loss)
before depreciation and amortization and non-cash stock charges.

We believe that advancements in digital technologies, together with the
explosive growth of the Internet, have positioned the cable television
industry's high-speed, interactive broadband network as the primary platform for
the delivery of video, voice and data services to homes and businesses. To
capitalize on these opportunities, we are rapidly upgrading our cable network to
allow for the widespread launch of advanced broadband products and services to
our customers. Including the cable systems we acquired in 2000, approximately
74% of our cable network was upgraded with 550MHz to 750MHz bandwidth capacity
and 47% of our homes passed were activated with two-way communications
capability as of December 31, 2000. Our upgrade program already has enabled us
to offer these advanced broadband products and services to a significant number
of our customers. As of December 31, 2000, our digital cable service was
available to 400,000 basic subscribers, and our high-speed Internet access, or
cable modem service, was launched in cable systems with 486,000 homes passed.

Our principal executive offices are located at 100 Crystal Run Road,
Middletown, New York 10941 and our telephone number at that address is (845)
695-2600. Our website is located at www.mediacomcc.com. The information on our
website is not part of this Annual Report.


4


General Business Developments

2000 Events

In February 2000, MCC completed an initial public offering of its Class A
common stock for total net proceeds of approximately $354.1 million. Immediately
prior to the completion of MCC's initial public offering, MCC issued shares of
its Class A and Class B common stock in exchange for all of our outstanding
membership interests and became our sole member and manager. Upon completion of
MCC's initial public offering, MCC contributed such net proceeds to us in the
form of equity capital, and the management agreements between Mediacom
Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation, and our operating subsidiaries
were replaced with new agreements between MCC and our operating subsidiaries.

In 2000, we completed nine acquisitions of cable systems that served
approximately 53,000 basic subscribers as of December 31, 2000, for an aggregate
purchase price of $109.2 million. These cable systems serve communities in
Alabama, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Minnesota and South Dakota, which are located
within our regional operating clusters.

In December 2000, MCC signed a binding commitment letter with At Home
Network Solutions, Inc., a partially-owned subsidiary of At Home Corporation,
for a new cable affiliate relationship. This new affiliation enables us to offer
the Excite@Home high-speed broadband Internet service to our customers and
replaces our previous third-party provider, ISP Channel, Inc., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of SoftNet Systems, Inc. We are currently transitioning our customers
to the Excite@Home service and MCC is completing the documentation of its
definitive agreement with At Home Solutions.

2001 Events

On January 24, 2001, we and Mediacom Capital completed an offering of
$500.0 million of 9 1/2% senior notes due January 2013. Approximately $467.5
million of the net proceeds were used to repay a substantial portion of the
indebtedness outstanding under our subsidiary credit facilities and related
accrued interest. The balance of the net proceeds is being used for general
corporate purposes.

On February 7, 2001, we and Mediacom Capital filed a registration
statement with the SEC under which we may sell debt securities for a maximum
amount of $1.0 billion. The SEC declared this registration statement effective
on February 13, 2001.

On February 26, 2001, MCC entered into agreements with AT&T Broadband, LLC
to acquire cable systems serving approximately 840,000 basic subscribers in
Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri, for an aggregate purchase price of $2.215
billion in cash, subject to closing adjustments. Among the AT&T systems' largest
clusters are communities such as: Albany, Columbus, Tifton and Valdosta,
Georgia; Charleston, Carbondale, Effingham, Marion, Moline and Rock Island,
Illinois; Ames, Cedar Rapids, Clinton, Davenport, Des Moines, Dubuque, Fort
Dodge, Iowa City, Mason City and Waterloo, Iowa; and Columbia, Jefferson City
and Springfield, Missouri. MCC expects to fund these acquisitions through a
combination of new debt and equity financings and borrowings under our existing
subsidiary credit facilities. These pending transactions are expected to close
in the second or third quarter of 2001, subject to customary closing conditions
and the receipt of regulatory and other approvals.

Unless otherwise stated in this Annual Report, the operating and financial
data contained herein do not include the effect of the pending AT&T
transactions.


5


Business Strategy

Our objective is to become the leading cable operator focused on providing
entertainment, information and telecommunications services in non-metropolitan
markets of the United States. The key elements of our strategy are to:

Improve the Operating and Financial Performance of Our Acquired Cable
Systems

We seek to rapidly integrate our acquired cable systems and improve their
operating and financial performance. Prior to completion of an acquisition, we
formulate plans for customer care and billing improvements, network upgrades,
headend consolidation, new product and service launches, competitive positioning
and human resource requirements. After completing an acquisition, we implement
managerial, operating, purchasing, personnel and engineering changes designed to
effect these plans.

Develop Efficient Operating Clusters

Our systems currently are managed through six regional operating clusters
by local management teams that oversee system activities and operate
autonomously within financial and operating guidelines established by our
corporate office. To enhance these clusters, our acquisition strategy focuses,
in part, on acquiring or trading for systems in close proximity to our own
systems. By further concentrating the geographic clustering of our cable
systems, we expect additional operating efficiencies through the consolidation
of many managerial, customer service, marketing, administrative and technical
functions.

The clustering of systems also enables us to consolidate headend
facilities, resulting in lower fixed capital costs on a per home basis as we
introduce new and enhanced products and services because of the larger number of
customers served by a single headend facility. This headend consolidation also
improves our ability to sell advertising on our cable systems. As a result of
our clustering and upgrade program, by December 2002 we plan to eliminate 309
headend facilities so that all of our customers will be served by 100 headend
facilities and 92% of our customers will be served by 40 headend facilities.

Rapidly Upgrade Our Cable Network

We are rapidly upgrading our cable network to provide new broadband
products and services, improve our competitive position and increase overall
customer satisfaction. By December 2002, we anticipate that 95% of our basic
subscribers will be served by cable systems with 550MHz to 870MHz bandwidth
capacity and two-way communications capability. As part of our upgrade program,
we plan to deploy over 10,000 route miles of fiber optic cable to create large
regional fiber optic networks with the potential to provide advanced
telecommunications services. Our upgrade plans will allow us to:

o offer digital cable television, high-speed Internet access
and interactive video services;

o increase channel capacity to a minimum of 82 channels, and
significantly more with digital video technology;

o activate the two-way communications capability of our systems, which
will give our customers the ability to send and receive signals over
our cable network;

o eliminate 309 headend facilities, lowering our fixed capital costs
on a per home basis as we introduce new products and services; and

o utilize our regional fiber optic networks to offer advanced
telecommunications services.


6


Introduce New and Enhanced Products and Services

We have acquired cable systems that we believe generally underserved their
customers prior to our ownership. We believe that significant opportunities
exist to increase our revenues by expanding the array of products and services
we offer. We have used and will continue to use the expanded channel capacity of
our upgraded systems to introduce several new basic programming services,
additional premium services and numerous pay-per-view channels.

Utilizing digital video technology, we are offering multiple packages of
premium services, several pay-per-view channels on a near video-on-demand basis,
digital music services and interactive program guides. As of December 31, 2000,
our digital cable service was available to 400,000 basic subscribers. We also
offer high-speed Internet access at speeds up to 100 times faster than a
conventional telephone modem. As of December 31, 2000, we launched cable modem
service in cable systems with 486,000 homes passed. In addition, we are
currently exploring opportunities in interactive video and telecommunications
services.

Maximize Customer Satisfaction to Build Customer Loyalty

As a result of our strong regional and local management presence, we are
responsive to customer needs and preferences and better positioned to strengthen
relations with the local government authorities and the communities we serve. We
seek a high level of customer satisfaction by providing superior customer
service and attractively priced product and service offerings. We believe our
investments in the cable network are increasing customer satisfaction as a
result of a wide array of new product and service introductions, greater
technical reliability and improved quality of service. We have implemented
stringent internal customer service standards, which we believe meet or exceed
those established by the National Cable Television Association. We have regional
calling centers servicing 84% of our customers that are staffed with dedicated
personnel who provide service 24 hours a day, seven days a week. We believe that
our focus on customer service has enhanced our reputation in the communities we
serve, which has increased customer loyalty and the potential demand for our new
and enhanced products and services.

Acquire Underperforming Cable Systems Principally in Non-Metropolitan Markets

Our disciplined acquisition strategy targets underperforming cable systems
serving primarily non-metropolitan markets. These systems are typically within
the top 50 to 100 television markets and small and medium-sized communities
where customers generally require cable to clearly receive a full complement of
off-air television signals. We believe that there are advantages in acquiring
and operating cable systems in non-metropolitan markets, including:

o less direct competition given the lower housing densities and the
resulting higher costs per customer of constructing a cable network;

o higher penetration levels of our services and lower customer
turnover as a result of fewer competing entertainment alternatives;
and

o generally lower overhead and operating costs than those incurred by
cable operators serving larger markets.

In addition, we seek to acquire or trade for cable systems in close
proximity to our existing operations because it is more cost effective to
provide cable television and advanced telecommunications services over an
expanded subscriber base within a concentrated geographic area. We have been
able to purchase fill-in acquisitions at favorable prices in geographic regions
where we are the dominant provider of cable television services. In 2000, we
completed nine acquisitions of cable systems serving approximately 53,000 basic
subscribers as of December 31, 2000 for an aggregate purchase price of $109.2
million. These cable systems serve communities in Alabama, Illinois, Iowa,
Kentucky, Minnesota and South Dakota, which are located within our regional
operating clusters.


7


Implement a Flexible Financing Structure

To support our business strategy and enhance our financial flexibility, we
have developed a financing strategy utilizing a blend of equity and debt capital
to complement our acquisition and operating activities. We have diversified our
sources of debt capital by raising long-term debt while utilizing our operating
subsidiaries to access debt, principally in the commercial bank market, through
separate borrowing groups.

We believe our financing strategy is beneficial because it broadens our
access to various equity and debt markets, enhances our flexibility in managing
our capital structure, reduces the overall cost of debt capital and permits us
to maintain a substantial liquidity position in the form of unused and available
subsidiary credit facilities. As of December 31, 2000, the unused credit
commitments under our subsidiary credit facilities were approximately $436.6
million and our overall cost of debt capital was 8.2%.

Products and Services

We provide our customers with the ability to tailor their product
selection from a full array of core cable television services. In addition, we
offer our customers advanced broadband products and services such as digital
cable television and high-speed Internet access. These products and services
have been introduced to a significant portion of our customer base. In 2001, we
plan to further introduce digital cable and high-speed Internet access across
our cable systems and to aggressively market these services to our customer
base. We also are exploring opportunities in interactive programming and
telecommunications services.

Core Cable Television Services

We design both our basic channel line-up and our additional channel
offerings for each system according to demographics, programming preferences,
channel capacity, competition, price sensitivity and local regulation. Our core
cable television service offerings include the following in most of our cable
systems:

Limited Basic Service. Our limited basic service includes, for a monthly
fee, local broadcast channels, network and independent stations, limited
satellite-delivered programming, and local public, government, home-shopping and
leased access channels.

Expanded Basic Service. Our expanded basic service includes, for an
additional monthly fee, various satellite-delivered channels such as CNN, MTV,
USA Network, ESPN, Lifetime, Nickelodeon and TNT.

Premium Service. Our premium services are satellite-delivered channels
consisting principally of feature films, original programming, live sports
events, concerts and other special entertainment features, usually presented
without commercial interruption. HBO, Cinemax, Showtime, The Movie Channel and
Starz are typical examples. Such premium programming services are offered by the
systems both on a per-channel basis and as part of premium service packages
designed to enhance customer value and to enable us to take advantage of
programming agreements offering cost incentives based on premium service unit
growth.

The significant expansion of bandwidth capacity resulting from our capital
improvement program will allow us to expand the use of tiered and multichannel
packaging strategies for marketing and promoting premium and niche programming
services. We believe that these packaging strategies will increase basic and
premium penetration as well as revenue per basic subscriber.

Pay-Per-View Service. Our pay-per-view services allow customers to pay to
view a single showing of a feature film, live sporting event, concert and other
special event, on an unedited, commercial-free basis. Such pay-per-view services
are offered by us on a per-viewing basis, with subscribers only paying for
programs which they select for viewing.


8


Digital Cable Services

Digital video technology offers significant advantages. Most importantly,
this technology allows us to greatly increase our channel offerings through the
use of compression, which converts one analog channel into eight to 12 digital
channels. The implementation of digital technology has significantly enhanced
and expanded the video and other service offerings we provide to our customers.

We currently offer our customers several digital cable programming
packages that include:

o up to 42 multichannel premium services;

o up to 34 pay-per-view movie and sports channels;

o up to 45 channels of digital music; and

o an interactive on-screen program guide to help them navigate the new
digital choices.

We first introduced digital cable services in our cable systems in June
1999. As of December 31, 2000, our digital service was available to 400,000
basic subscribers and we served 40,000 digital customers. By year-end 2001, we
expect our digital cable service to be available to 550,000 basic subscribers
and to serve between 90,000 and 100,000 digital customers.

High-Speed Internet Access

Our broadband cable network enables data to be transmitted up to 100 times
faster than traditional telephone modem technologies. This high-speed capability
allows our cable modem customer to receive and transmit large files from the
Internet in a fraction of the time required when using the traditional telephone
modem. It also allows much quicker response times when surfing the Internet,
providing a richer experience for the customer. In addition, the cable modem
service eliminates the need for a telephone line, is always activated and does
not require the customer to dial into the Internet service provider and await
authorization.

We first introduced two-way, high-speed Internet access service in our
cable systems in November 1999. As of December 31, 2000, we launched cable modem
service in cable systems with 486,000 homes passed and we served 12,000 cable
modem customers. We also provided dial-up telephone Internet access to 3,600
customers. By year-end 2001, we expect to launch cable modem service in cable
systems with 800,000 homes passed and to serve between 45,000 and 50,000 data
customers.

In December 2000, MCC signed a binding commitment letter with At Home
Network Solutions, Inc., a partially-owned subsidiary of At Home Corporation,
for a new cable affiliate relationship. This new affiliation enables us to offer
the Excite@Home high-speed broadband Internet service to our customers under the
name Mediacom@Home. Through January 2001, ISP Channel was the third party
provider of Internet access to our cable modem customers. As of January 31,
2001, our relationship with ISP Channel was terminated. We are currently
transitioning our customers to the Excite@Home service and MCC is completing the
documentation of its definitive agreement with At Home Solutions.

Future Services

Interactive Services. Our upgraded cable network will have the capacity to
deliver various interactive television services. Interactive television can be
divided among three general service categories: enhanced television; Internet
access over the television; and video-on-demand. These new services enable the
customer to interact over the television set, generally by using a conventional
remote television control or a computer keyboard, to either buy a product or
service or request information on a product or service.

Enhanced television includes such services as ancillary programming
information, interactive advertising and impulse sales and purchases. Companies
delivering enhanced television services include TV Guide Interactive, Wink
Communications, Liberate Technologies and OpenTV. Internet access and e-mail
over the television are delivered using a set-top box with the customer using a
wireless keyboard. Companies providing Internet access over the television
include WebTV and WorldGate Communications. The provision of video-on-demand
services requires the

9


use of servers at the headend facility of a cable system to provide hundreds of
movies or special events on demand with video cassette recorder functionality,
or the ability to fast forward, pause and rewind a program at will. Companies
providing video-on-demand services include Concurrent Computer Corporation, DIVA
Systems Corporation, Intertainer Inc., N-Cube, Sea Change International and
others. We are in discussions with several interactive service providers and
expect to initiate trial launches of interactive services in the second half of
2001.

Telecommunications Services. We are exploring technologies using Internet
protocol telephony as well as traditional switching technologies that are
currently available to transmit telephony signals over our cable network. Our
upgrade plans include the installation of over 10,000 route miles of fiber optic
cable resulting in the creation of large, high-capacity regional networks. We
are constructing our networks with excess fiber optic capacity, thereby
affording us the flexibility to pursue new data and telecommunications
opportunities. We are in discussions with several telecommunications service
providers and are developing plans for trial launches of such services.


10


Description of Our Cable Systems

Overview

The table below provides an overview of selected operating and technical
statistics for our cable systems for the years ended:



1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
---- ---- ---- ---- ----

Operating Data:
Homes passed(1)....................... 38,749 87,750 520,000 1,071,500 1,173,000
Basic subscribers(2).................. 27,153 64,350 354,000 719,000 779,000
Basic penetration(3).................. 70.1% 73.3% 68.1% 67.1% 66.4%
Premium service units(4).............. 11,691 39,288 407,100 587,000 597,000
Premium penetration(5)................ 43.1% 61.1% 115.0% 81.6% 76.6%
Average monthly revenues
per basic subscriber(6)............ $34.09 $32.11 $32.88 $35.52 $38.45

Digital Cable:
Digital-ready basic subscribers(7).... - - - 168,000 400,000
Digital customers..................... - - - 5,300 40,000
Digital penetration(8)................ - - - 3.2% 10.0%

Data:
Data-ready homes passed(9)............ - - - 120,000 550,000
Data-ready homes marketed(10)......... - - - 105,500 486,000
Dial-up customers(11).............. 2,225 2,518 4,729 4,600 3,600
Cable modem customers.............. - - - 500 12,000
------ ------ ------- --------- ---------
Total data customers.................. 2,225 2,518 4,729 5,100 15,600
Data penetration(12).................. - - - 4.8% 3.2%

Cable Network Data:
Miles of plant........................ 736 1,697 11,950 22,444 24,500
Density(13)........................... 53 52 44 48 48
Percentage of basic subscribers at
550MHz to 750MHz................... 0% 25% 45% 57% 74%


- ----------
(1) Represents the number of single residence homes, apartments and
condominium units passed by the cable distribution network in a cable
system's service area.
(2) Represents subscribers of a cable television system who receive a package
of over-the-air broadcast stations, local access channels or certain
satellite-delivered cable television services and who are usually charged
a flat monthly rate for a number of channels.
(3) Represents basic subscribers as a percentage of total number of homes
passed.
(4) Represents the number of subscriptions to premium services. A subscriber
may purchase more than one premium service, each of which is counted as a
separate premium service unit.
(5) Represents premium service units as a percentage of the total number of
basic subscribers. This ratio may be greater than 100% if the average
basic subscriber subscribes to more than one premium service unit.
(6) Represents average monthly revenues for the last three months of the
period divided by average basic subscribers for such period. Includes the
revenues from cable systems acquired during the last three months of the
period as if such acquisitions were completed at the beginning of the
three month period.
(7) A subscriber is digital-ready if the subscriber is in a system where
digital cable services have been launched.
(8) Represents digital customers as a percentage of digital-ready basic
subscribers.
(9) A home passed is data-ready if it is in a system with two-way
communications capability.
(10) Data-ready homes marketed represents data-ready homes passed where cable
modem service has been launched.
(11) A customer that accesses the Internet through a conventional modem and
telephone line connection.
(12) Represents the number of total data customers as a percentage of total
data-ready homes marketed.
(13) Represents homes passed divided by miles of plant.


11


Selected Operating Region Data

Our systems currently are managed through six operating regions by local
management teams that oversee system activities and operate autonomously within
financial and operating guidelines established by our corporate office. The
following table sets forth the six operating regions, the principal states
served by such regions, and their respective homes passed, basic subscribers and
basic penetration as of December 31, 2000:



Homes Basic Basic
Region States Passed Subscribers Penetration
------ ------ ------ ----------- -----------


Midwest................. Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, 302,500 194,150 64.2%
Ohio
North Central........... Iowa, Minnesota, South 283,000 193,400 68.3%
Dakota, Wisconsin
Southern................ Alabama, Florida, 214,300 153,200 71.5%
Mississippi, Tennessee
Mid-Atlantic............ Delaware, Maryland, 129,000 89,000 69.0%
North Carolina, Virginia
Central.................. Kansas, Kentucky, 139,600 87,650 62.8%
Missouri, Oklahoma
Western................. Arizona, California 104,600 61,600 58.9%
---------- --------- ------
Total 1,173,000 779,000 66.4%
========== ========= ======


Technology Overview

As part of our commitment to maximize customer satisfaction, to improve
our competitive position and to introduce new and enhanced products and services
to our customers, we continue to make significant investments to upgrade our
cable network. The current objectives of our upgrade program are to:

o increase the bandwidth capacity to 870MHz;

o activate two-way communications capability;

o consolidate our headend facilities, through the extensive deployment
of fiber optic networks; and

o allow us to provide digital cable television, high-speed
Internet access, interactive video and other telecommunications
services.

The following table describes the technological state of our cable network
as of December 31, 2000 and through December 31, 2002, based on our current
upgrade plans:

Percentage of Basic Subscribers
-------------------------------
Less than 550MHz- Two-Way
550MHz 870MHz Capable
--------- ------- -------
December 31, 2000............ 26% 74% 47%
December 31, 2001............ 10% 90% 80%
December 31, 2002............ 5% 95% 95%


12


By December 2002, we expect that 95% of our basic subscribers will be
served by cable systems that have been upgraded with 550MHz to 870MHz bandwidth
capacity and two-way communications capability. A central feature of our upgrade
program is the deployment of high capacity, hybrid fiber-optic coaxial
architecture. The hybrid fiber-optic coaxial architecture combines the use of
fiber optic cable, which can carry hundreds of video, data and voice channels
over extended distances, with coaxial cable, which requires a more extensive
signal amplification in order to obtain the desired levels for delivering
channels. In most of our cable systems, we connect fiber optic cable to
individual nodes serving an average of 350 homes or commercial buildings. A node
is a single connection to a cable system's main, high-capacity fiber optic cable
that is shared by a number of customers. Coaxial cable is then connected from
each node to the individual homes or buildings. Our network design generally
provides for six strands of fiber to each node, with two strands active and four
strands reserved for future services. We believe hybrid fiber-optic coaxial
architecture provides higher capacity, superior signal quality, greater network
reliability, reduced operating costs and more reserve capacity for the addition
of future services than traditional coaxial network design.

Two-way communications capability will permit our customers to send and
receive signals over the cable network so that interactive services, such as
video-on-demand, will be accessible and high-speed Internet access will not
require a separate telephone line. This capability will also position us to
offer cable telephony, using either Internet protocol telephony as it becomes
commercially feasible, or the traditional switching technologies that are
currently available. We believe our plans for two-way communications capability,
together with hybrid fiber-optic coaxial architecture, will enhance our cable
network's ability to provide advanced telecommunications services.

As of December 31, 2000, our cable systems were operated from 409 headend
facilities. We believe that fiber optics and advanced transmission technologies
make it cost effective to consolidate our headend facilities, allowing us to
realize operating efficiencies and resulting in lower fixed capital costs on a
per home basis as we introduce new products and services. By December 2002, we
plan to eliminate 309 headend facilities so that all of our customers will be
served by 100 headend facilities and 92% of our customers will be served by 40
headend facilities.

As part of this headend consolidation program, we plan to deploy over
10,000 route miles of fiber optic cable to create large regional fiber optic
networks with the potential to provide advanced telecommunications services. We
are constructing our regional networks with excess fiber optic capacity to
accommodate new and expanded products and services in the future.

Sales and Marketing

We seek to be the premier provider of entertainment, information and
telecommunications services in the markets we serve. Our marketing programs and
campaigns offer a variety of cable services creatively packaged and tailored to
appeal to each of our local markets and to segments within each market. We
routinely survey our customers to ensure that we are meeting their demands and
our customer surveys keep us abreast of our competition so that we can
effectively counter competitors' service offerings and promotional campaigns.
With our strong local presence, we interact with our customers on a more
individualized basis allowing us to better service our customers and enhance
customer loyalty and trust.

We use a coordinated array of marketing techniques to attract and retain
customers and to increase premium service penetration, including door-to-door
and direct mail solicitation, telemarketing, media advertising, local
promotional events, typically sponsored by programming services and
cross-channel promotion of new services and pay-per-view.

We build awareness of our brand through a variety of promotional
campaigns, particularly in our newly acquired systems. As a result of our
branding efforts, our emphasis on customer service and our investments in the
cable network, we believe we have developed a reputation for quality,
reliability and timely introduction of new products and services.

We invest a significant amount of time, effort and financial resources in
the training and evaluation of our marketing professionals and customer sales
representatives. Our customer sales representatives customize their sales
presentation to fit each of our customers' specific needs by conducting focused
consumer research and are given the incentive to use their frequent contact with
our customers as opportunities to sell our new products and services. As a


13


result, we believe we can accelerate the introduction of new products and
services to our customers and achieve high success rates in attracting and
retaining customers.

Programming Supply

We have various contracts to obtain basic and premium programming for the
systems from program suppliers whose compensation is typically based on a fixed
fee per customer. Our programming contracts are generally for a fixed period of
time and are subject to negotiated renewal. Some program suppliers provide
volume discount pricing structures or offer marketing support to us. Our
successful marketing of multiple premium service packages emphasizing customer
value enables us to take advantage of such cost incentives. In addition, we are
a member of the National Cable Television Cooperative, Inc., a programming
consortium consisting of small to medium-sized multiple system operators
serving, in the aggregate, over twelve million cable subscribers. The consortium
helps create efficiencies in the areas of obtaining and administering
programming contracts, as well as securing more favorable programming rates and
contract terms for small to medium-sized cable operators. We negotiate
programming contract renewals both directly and through the consortium to obtain
the best available contract terms.

Our programming costs are expected to increase in the future due to
additional programming being provided to our customers, increased costs to
purchase programming, inflationary increases and other factors affecting the
cable television industry. Although we will legally be able to pass through
expected increases in our programming costs to customers, there can be no
assurance that the marketplace will allow us to do so. We also have various
retransmission consent arrangements with commercial broadcast stations, which
generally expire in December 2002. None of these consents require payment of
fees for carriage. However, we have entered into agreements with certain
stations to carry satellite-delivered cable programming, which is affiliated
with the network carried by such stations.

Currently, there are over 200 cable programming networks carried or
seeking to be carried on our cable systems. We use the analog and digital
channel capacity resulting from our capital improvement program to negotiate
more favorable long-term contracts with our programming suppliers and utilize
other financial arrangements to offset programming cost increases.

Customer Rates

Monthly customer rates for services vary from market to market, primarily
according to the amount of programming provided. As of December 31, 2000, our
monthly basic service rates for residential customers ranged from $5.18 to
$36.55; the combined monthly basic and expanded basic service rates for
residential customers ranged from $19.95 to $38.95; and per-channel premium
service rates, not including special promotions, ranged from $0.30 to $13.00 per
service for our cable systems.

A one-time installation fee, which we may wholly or partially waive during
a promotional period, is usually charged to new customers. We charge monthly
fees for converters and remote control tuning devices and also charge
administrative fees for delinquent payments for service. Customers are free to
discontinue service at any time without additional charge in the majority of the
systems and may be charged a reconnection fee to resume service. Commercial
customers, such as hotels, motels and hospitals, are charged negotiated monthly
fees and a non-recurring fee for the installation of service. Multiple dwelling
units, which include commercial customers as well as condominiums and apartment
complexes, may be offered a bulk rate in exchange for single-point billing and
basic service to all units.

In addition to customer fees, we derive revenues from the sale of local
spot advertising time on locally originated and satellite-delivered programming
and from affiliations with home shopping services, which offer merchandise for
sale to customers and compensate system operators with a percentage of their
sales receipts. Our headend consolidation program will increase the
concentration of customers served by our headend facilities. We believe the
greater concentration of customers served by our remaining headend facilities
will enable us to increase our advertising revenues.


14


Customer Service and Community Relations

We are dedicated to providing superior customer service. Our emphasis on
system reliability and customer satisfaction is a cornerstone of our business
strategy. We expect that on going investments in our cable network will
significantly strengthen customer service, enhancing the reliability of our
cable network and allowing us to introduce new products and services to our
customers. We have implemented stringent internal customer service standards,
which we believe meet or exceed those established by the National Cable
Television Association. We maintain five regional calling centers, which service
84% of our cable systems' customers. They are staffed with dedicated personnel
who provide service to our customers 24 hours a day, seven days a week, on a
toll-free basis. We believe our regional calling centers allow us to coordinate
more effectively installation appointments and reduce response time to customer
inquiries. We continue to invest in both personnel and equipment of our regional
calling centers to ensure that these operating units are professionally managed
and employ state-of-the-art technology.

In addition, we are dedicated to fostering strong community relations in
the communities served by our cable systems. We support local charities and
community causes in various ways, including staged events and promotional
campaigns to raise funds and supplies for persons in need and in-kind donations
that include production services and free airtime on cable networks. We
participate in the "Cable in the Classroom" program, which is a national effort
by cable companies to provide schools with free cable television service and,
where available, Internet access. We also install and provide free cable
television service to government buildings and not-for-profit hospitals in our
franchise areas. We believe that our relations with the communities in which our
cable systems operate are good.

Franchises

Cable systems are generally operated under non-exclusive franchises
granted by local governmental authorities. These franchises typically contain
many conditions, such as: time limitations on commencement and completion of
construction; conditions of service, including number of channels, types of
programming and the provision of free service to schools and other public
institutions; and the granting of insurance and indemnity bonds by the cable
operator. Many of the provisions of local franchises are subject to federal
regulation under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.

As of December 31, 2000, our cable systems were subject to 1,018
franchises. These franchises, which are non-exclusive, provide for the payment
of fees to the issuing authority. In most of the cable systems, such franchise
fees are passed through directly to the customers. The Cable Communications
Policy Act of 1984 prohibits franchising authorities from imposing franchise
fees in excess of 5% of gross revenues and also permits the cable operator to
seek renegotiation and modification of franchise requirements if warranted by
changed circumstances.

Substantially all of our cable systems' basic subscribers are in service
areas that require a franchise. The table below groups the franchises of our
cable systems by date of expiration and presents the approximate number and
percentage of basic subscribers for each group as of December 31, 2000.



Percentage of Number of Percentage of
Number of Total Basic Total Basic
Year of Franchise Expiration Franchises Franchises Subscribers Subscribers
---------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- -----------

2001 through 2004.......................... 309 30.4% 264,439 33.9%
2005 and thereafter........................ 709 69.6% 514,561 66.1%
----- ------ ------- ------
Total................................. 1,018 100.0% 779,000 100.0%
===== ====== ======= ======


The 1984 Cable Act provides, among other things, for an orderly franchise
renewal process in which franchise renewal will not be unreasonably withheld or,
if renewal is denied and the franchising authority acquires ownership of the
cable system or effects a transfer of the cable system to another person, the
operator generally is entitled to the fair market value for the cable system
covered by such franchise. In addition, the 1984 Cable Act established
comprehensive renewal procedures, which require that an incumbent franchisee's
renewal application be assessed on its own merits and not as part of a
comparative process with competing applications.


15


We believe that we generally have good relationships with our franchising
communities. We have never had a franchise revoked or failed to have a franchise
renewed. In addition, substantially all of our franchises eligible for renewal
have been renewed or extended prior to their stated expirations, and no
franchise community has refused to consent to a franchise transfer to us.

Competition

We, like most cable systems, compete on the basis of several factors,
including price and the quality and variety of services offered. We face
competition from various communications and entertainment providers, the number
and type of which we expect to increase as we expand the products and services
offered over our broadband network. We believe our ability to package multiple
services, such as digital television and high-speed Internet access, is an
advantage in our competitive business environment.

Providers of Broadcast Television and Other Entertainment

The extent to which a cable system competes with over-the-air
broadcasting, which provides signals that a viewer is able to receive directly,
depends upon the quality and quantity of the broadcast signals available by
direct antenna reception compared to the quality and quantity of such signals
and alternative services offered by a cable system. Cable systems also face
competition from alternative methods of distributing and receiving television
signals and from other sources of entertainment such as live sporting events,
movie theaters and home video products, including videotape recorders and
videodisc players. In recent years, the FCC has adopted policies authorizing new
technologies and a more favorable operating environment for certain existing
technologies that provide, or may provide, substantial additional competition
for cable systems. The extent to which a cable television service is
competitive depends in significant part upon the cable system's ability to
provide a greater variety of programming, superior technical performance and
superior customer service than are available over the air or through competitive
alternative delivery sources.

Direct Broadcast Satellite Providers

Individuals can purchase home satellite dishes, which allow them to
receive satellite-delivered broadcast and non-broadcast program services,
commonly known as DBS, that formerly were available only to cable television
subscribers. According to recent government and industry reports, conventional,
medium and high-power satellites currently provide video programming services to
approximately 15.0 million individual households, condominiums, apartments and
office complexes in the United States.

DBS service can be received virtually anywhere in the continental United
States through the installation of a small roof top or side-mounted antenna, and
it is accessible in areas where a cable plant has not been constructed or where
it is not cost effective to construct cable television facilities. DBS systems
use video compression technology to increase channel capacity and digital
technology to improve the quality of the signals transmitted to their customers.
DBS service is being heavily marketed on a nationwide basis by several service
operators. We believe our digital cable service is competitive with the
programming, channel capacity and the digital quality of signals delivered to
customers by DBS systems.

Two major companies, DirecTV and Echostar, are currently providing
nationwide high-power DBS services, which typically offer to their customers
more than 300 channels of programming, including programming similar to that
provided by cable systems. Pursuant to legislation enacted in November 1999, DBS
operators have begun to deliver local broadcast signals. This change in law
eliminated a significant competitive advantage which cable system operators had
over DBS operators, as previously DBS operators were not permitted to retransmit
local broadcast signals. DirecTV and Echostar now deliver local broadcast
signals in a number of the largest markets and they plan to expand such carriage
to many more markets. The FCC has adopted rules effective January 2002 which
place a must-carry requirement on DBS operators in any market where they
retransmit one or more local signal. The current capacity limitations of
satellite technology may limit the DBS operators' ability to comply with these
must-carry requirements. The DBS industry recently initiated a judicial
challenge to the January 2002 requirement on the grounds that it is
unconstitutional. These companies and others are also developing ways to bring
advanced communications services to their customers. They are currently offering
satellite-delivered high-speed Internet access services with a


16


telephone return path and are beginning to provide true two-way interactivity.
We are unable to predict the effects these competitive developments might have
on our business and operations.

Multichannel Multipoint Distribution Systems

Multichannel multipoint distribution systems deliver programming services
over microwave channels licensed by the FCC and received by subscribers with
special antennas. These wireless cable systems are less capital intensive and
subject to fewer regulatory requirements than cable television systems, and are
not required to obtain local franchises or pay franchise fees. To date, the
ability of wireless cable services to compete with cable systems has been
limited by a channel capacity of up to 35 channels and the need for unobstructed
line-of-sight over-the-air transmission. Although relatively few wireless cable
systems in the United States are currently in operation or under construction,
virtually all markets have been licensed or tentatively licensed. The use of
digital compression technology, and the FCC's recent amendment to its rules to
permit reverse path or two-way transmission over wireless facilities, may enable
multichannel multipoint distribution systems to deliver more channels and
additional services, including Internet related services. Digital compression
technology refers to the conversion of the standard video signal into a digital
signal and the compression of that signal to facilitate multiple channel
transmissions through a single channel's signal.

Private Cable Television Systems

Private cable television systems compete with conventional cable
television systems for the right to service condominiums, apartment complexes
and other multiple unit residential developments. The operators of these private
systems, known as satellite master antenna television (SMATV) systems, provide
improved reception of local television stations and several of the same
satellite-delivered programming services offered by franchised cable systems.
SMATV system operators often enter into exclusive agreements with apartment
building owners or homeowners' associations that preclude franchised cable
television operators from serving residents of such private complexes and
typically are not subject to regulation like local franchised cable operators.
However, the 1984 Cable Act gives franchised cable operators the right to use
existing compatible easements within their franchise areas on nondiscriminatory
terms and conditions. Accordingly, where there are preexisting compatible
easements, cable operators may not be unfairly denied access or discriminated
against with respect to access to the premises served by those easements.
Conflicting judicial decisions have been issued interpreting the scope of the
access right granted by the 1984 Cable Act, particularly with respect to
easements located entirely on private property. Under the 1996 Telecom Act,
satellite master antenna television systems can interconnect non-commonly owned
buildings without having to comply with local, state and federal regulatory
requirements that are imposed upon cable systems providing similar services, as
long as they do not use public rights of way. The FCC has held that the latter
provision is not violated so long as interconnection across public rights of way
is provided by a third party.

Traditional Overbuilds

Cable television systems are operated under non-exclusive franchises
granted by local authorities. More than one cable system may legally be built in
the same area. Franchising authorities have from time to time granted additional
franchises to other companies, including other cable operators or telephone
companies, and these additional franchises might contain terms and conditions
more favorable than those afforded to the incumbent cable operator. In addition,
entities willing to establish an open video system, under which they offer
unaffiliated programmers non-discriminatory access to a portion of the system's
cable system, may be able to avoid significant local franchising requirements.
Well financed businesses from outside the cable industry, such as public
utilities which already possess or are developing fiber optic and other
transmission facilities in the areas they serve, may over time become
competitors. We believe that various entities are currently offering cable
service to an estimated 55,000 homes passed in the service areas of our
franchises.

Internet Access

We offer high-speed Internet access in many of our cable systems. These
cable systems will compete with a number of other companies, many of which have
substantial resources, such as existing Internet service providers, commonly
known as ISP's, and local and long distance telephone companies.


17


Recently, a number of ISP's have asked local authorities and the FCC to
give them rights of access to cable systems' broadband infrastructure so that
they can deliver their services directly to cable systems' customers. Many local
franchising authorities have been examining the issue and a few have required
cable operators to provide such access. Several Federal courts have ruled that
localities are not authorized to require such access. The FCC initiated an
inquiry into the appropriate regulatory treatment of Internet offered on cable
systems.

The deployment of digital subscriber line technology, known as DSL, allows
Internet access to subscribers at data transmission speeds equal to or greater
than that of modems over conventional telephone lines, putting it in direct
competition with cable modem service. Numerous companies, including telephone
companies, have introduced DSL service and certain telephone companies are
seeking to provide high-speed broadband services, including interactive online
services, without regard to present service boundaries and other regulatory
restrictions. We are unable to predict the likelihood of success of competing
online services or what impact these competitive ventures may have on our
business operations.

Other Competition

The FCC has authorized a new interactive television service which permits
non-video transmission of information between an individual's home and
entertainment and information service providers. This service, which can be used
by direct broadcast satellite systems, television stations and other video
programming distributors, including cable television systems, is an alternative
technology for the delivery of interactive video services. It does not appear at
the present time that this service will have a material impact on the operations
of cable television systems.

The FCC has allocated spectrum in the 28GHz range for a new multichannel
wireless service that can be used to provide video and telecommunications
services. The FCC completed the process of awarding licenses to use this
spectrum via a market-by-market auction. We do not know whether such a service
would have a material impact on the operations of cable television systems.

The 1996 Telecom Act directed the FCC to establish, and the FCC has
adopted, regulations and policies for the issuance of licenses for digital
television to incumbent television broadcast licensees. Digital television can
deliver high definition television pictures and multiple digital-quality program
streams, as well as CD-quality audio programming and advanced digital services,
such as data transfer or subscription video. The FCC also has authorized
television broadcast stations to transmit textual and graphic information that
may be useful to both consumers and businesses. The FCC also permits commercial
and noncommercial FM stations to use their subcarrier frequencies to provide
non-broadcast services, including data transmission.

Advances in communications technology, as well as changes in the
marketplace and the regulatory and legislative environment, are constantly
occurring. Thus, it is not possible to predict the competitive effect that
ongoing or future developments might have on the cable industry.

Employees

As of December 31, 2000, we employed 1,406 full-time employees and 165
part-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a labor union. We
consider our relations with our employees to be good.


18


Legislation and Regulation

A federal law known as the Communications Act of 1934 (the "Communications
Act"), as amended, establishes a national policy to guide the regulation,
development and operation of cable communications systems. In 1996, a
comprehensive amendment to the Communications Act became effective and is
expected to promote competition and decrease governmental regulation of various
communications industries, including the cable television industry. However,
until the desired competition develops, various federal, state and local
governmental units will have broad regulatory authority and responsibilities
over telecommunications and cable television matters. The courts, especially the
federal courts, will continue to play an important oversight role as the
statutory and regulatory provisions are interpreted and enforced by the various
federal, state and local governmental units.

The Communications Act allocates principal responsibility for enforcing
the federal policies between the FCC, state and local governmental authorities.
The FCC and state regulatory agencies regularly conduct administrative
proceedings to adopt or amend regulations implementing the statutory mandate of
the Communications Act. At various times, interested parties to these
administrative proceedings challenge the new or amended regulations and policies
in the courts with varying levels of success. We expect that further court
actions and regulatory proceedings will occur and will refine the rights and
obligations of various parties, including the government, under the
Communications Act. The results of these judicial and administrative proceedings
may materially affect the cable industry and our business and operations. In the
following paragraphs, we summarize the federal laws and regulations materially
affecting the growth and operation of the cable industry. We also provide a
brief description of certain state and local laws.

Federal Regulation

The Communications Act and the regulations and policies of the FCC affect
significant aspects of our cable system operations, including:

o subscriber rates;

o the content of the programming we offer to subscribers, as well as
the way we sell our program packages to subscribers;

o the use of our cable systems by the local franchising authorities,
the public and other unrelated companies;

o our franchise agreements with local governmental authorities;

o cable system ownership limitations and prohibitions; and

o our use of utility poles and conduit.

Subscriber Rates

The Communications Act and the FCC's regulations and policies limit the
ability of cable systems to raise rates for basic services and equipment. No
other rates can be regulated. Federal law exempts cable systems from rate
regulation of cable services and customer equipment only in communities that are
subject to effective competition, as defined by federal law. Federal law also
prohibits the regulation of cable operators' rates where comparable video
programming services, other than direct broadcast satellites, are offered by
local telephone companies, or their related parties, or by third parties using
the local telephone company's facilities.

Where there is no effective competition to the cable operator's services,
federal law gives local franchising authorities the responsibility to regulate
the rates charged by the operator for:

o the lowest level of programming service offered by cable operator,
typically called basic service, which includes the local broadcast
channels and any public access or governmental channels that are
required by the operator's franchise; and

o the installation, sale and lease of equipment used by subscribers to
receive basic service, such as converter boxes and remote control
units.


19


Local franchising authorities who wish to regulate basic service rates and
related equipment rates must first obtain FCC certification to regulate by
following a simplified FCC certification process and agreeing to follow
established FCC rules and policies when regulating the operator's rates.

Several years ago, the FCC adopted detailed rate regulations, guidelines
and rate forms that a cable system operator and the local franchising authority
must use in connection with the regulation of basic service and equipment rates.
The FCC adopted a benchmark methodology as the principal method of regulating
rates. However, if this methodology produces unacceptable rates, the operator
may also justify rates using a detailed cost-of-service methodology. The FCC's
rules also require franchising authorities to regulate equipment rates on the
basis of actual cost plus a reasonable profit, as defined by the FCC.

If the local franchising authority concludes that an operator's rates are
too high under the FCC's rate rules, the local franchising authority may require
the operator to reduce rates and to refund overcharges to subscribers, with
interest. The operator may appeal adverse local rate decisions to the FCC.

The FCC's regulations allow an operator to modify regulated rates on a
quarterly or annual basis to account for changes in:

o the number of regulated channels;

o inflation; and

o certain external costs, such as franchise and other governmental
fees, copyright and retransmission consent fees, taxes, programming
fees and franchise-related obligations.

As a further alternative, in 1995 the FCC adopted a simplified
cost-of-service methodology which can be used by small cable systems owned by
small cable companies. A small cable system is defined as a cable television
system which serves 15,000 or fewer basic customers. A small cable company is
defined as an entity serving a total of 400,000 or fewer basic customers that is
not affiliated with a larger cable television company, i.e., a larger cable
television company does not own more than a 20 percent equity share or exercise
legal control. This small system rate-setting methodology almost always results
in rates which exceed those produced by the benchmark and cost-of-service rules
applicable to larger cable television operators. Once the initial rates are set
they can be adjusted periodically for inflation and external cost changes as
described above. When an eligible small system grows larger than 15,000 basic
customers, it can maintain its then current rates, but it cannot increase its
rates in the normal course until an increase would be warranted under the rules
applicable to systems that have more than 15,000 customers. When a small cable
company grows larger than 400,000 basic customers, the qualified systems it then
owns will not lose their small system eligibility. If a small cable company
sells a qualified system, or if the company itself is sold, the qualified
systems retain that status even if the acquiring company is not a small cable
company. We were a small cable company, but with the completion of our
acquisitions in 1999, we no longer enjoy this status. However, as noted above,
the systems with less than 15,000 customers owned by us prior to the completion
of our acquisitions in 1999 remain eligible for small cable system rate
regulation.

The Communications Act and the FCC's regulations also:

o require operators to charge uniform rates throughout each franchise
area that is not subject to effective competition;

o prohibit regulation of non-predatory bulk discount rates offered by
operators to subscribers in commercial and residential developments;
and

o permit regulated equipment rates to be computed by aggregating costs
of broad categories of equipment at the franchise, system, regional
or company level.


20


Content Requirements

The Communications Act and the FCC's regulations contain broadcast signal
carriage requirements that allow local commercial television broadcast stations:

o to elect once every three years to require a cable system to carry
the station, subject to certain exceptions; or

o to negotiate with us on the terms by which we carry the station on
our cable system, commonly called retransmission consent.

The Communications Act requires a cable operator to devote up to one-third
of its activated channel capacity for the mandatory carriage of local commercial
television stations. The Communications Act also gives local non-commercial
television stations mandatory carriage rights; however, such stations are not
given the option to negotiate retransmission consent for the carriage of their
signals by cable systems. Additionally, cable systems must obtain retransmission
consent for:

o all distant commercial television stations, except for commercial
satellite-delivered independent superstations such as WGN;

o commercial radio stations; and

o certain low-power television stations.

The FCC has recently completed an administrative proceeding to consider
the requirements, for mandatory carriage of digital television signals offered
by local television broadcasters. Under the new regulations, local television
broadcast stations transmitting solely in a digital format are entitled to
request carriage in their choice of digital or converted analog format. Stations
transmitting in both digital and analog formats, which is permitted during the
current several-year transition period, have no carriage rights for the digital
format during the transition unless and until they turn in their analog channel.
We are unable to predict the impact of these new carriage requirements on the
operations of our cable systems.

The Communications Act requires our cable systems to permit subscribers to
purchase video programming we offer on a per channel or a per program basis
without the necessity of subscribing to any tier of service, other than the
basic cable service tier. However, we are not required to comply with this
requirement until December 2002 for any of our cable systems that do not have
addressable converter boxes or that have other substantial technological
limitations. Many of our cable systems do not have the technological capability
to offer programming in the manner required by the statute and thus currently
are exempt from complying with the requirement. We anticipate having significant
capital expenditures over the next two to three years in order for us to meet
this requirement. We are unable to predict whether the full implementation of
this statutory provision in December 2002 will have a material impact on the
operation of our cable systems.

To increase competition between cable operators and other video program
distributors, the Communications Act and the FCC's regulations:

o preclude any satellite video programmer affiliated with a cable
company, or with a common carrier providing video programming
directly to its subscribers, from favoring an affiliated company
over competitors;

o require such programmers to sell their programming to other
unaffiliated video program distributors; and

o limit the ability of such programmers to offer exclusive programming
arrangements to their related parties.


21


The Communications Act and the FCC's regulations contain restrictions on
the transmission by cable operators of obscene or indecent programming. It
requires cable operators to fully block both the video and audio portion of
sexually explicit or indecent programming on channels that are primarily
dedicated to sexually oriented programming or alternatively to carry such
programming only at safe harbor time periods, which are currently defined by the
FCC as the hours between 10 p.m. to 6 a.m. A three-judge federal district court
recently determined that this provision was unconstitutional. The federal
government appealed the lower court's decision to the United States Supreme
Court which recently agreed to review this case.

The FCC actively regulates other aspects of our programming, involving
such areas as:

o our use of syndicated and network programs and local sports
broadcast programming;

o advertising in children's programming;

o political advertising;

o origination cablecasting;

o sponsorship identification; and

o closed captioning of video programming.

Use of Our Cable Systems by the Government and Unrelated Third Parties

The Communications Act allows local franchising authorities and unrelated
third parties to have access to our cable systems' channel capacity for their
own use. For example, it:

o permits franchising authorities to require cable operators to set
aside channels for public, educational and governmental access
programming; and

o requires a cable system with 36 or more activated channels to
designate a significant portion of its channel capacity for
commercial leased access by third parties to provide programming
that may compete with services offered by the cable operator.

The FCC regulates various aspects of third party commercial use of channel
capacity on our cable systems, including:

o the maximum reasonable rate a cable operator may charge for third
party commercial use of the designated channel capacity;

o the terms and conditions for commercial use of such channels; and

o the procedures for the expedited resolution of disputes concerning
rates or commercial use of the designated channel capacity.

The FCC has from time to time received petitions from Internet service
providers to require access to our cable systems. We cannot predict if these or
other similar proposals will be adopted, or, if adopted, whether they will have
an adverse impact on our business and operations.


22


Franchise Matters

We have non-exclusive franchises in virtually every community in which we
operate that authorize us to construct, operate and maintain our cable systems.
Although franchising matters are normally regulated at the local level through a
franchise agreement or a local ordinance, the Communications Act provides
oversight and guidelines to govern our relationship with local franchising
authorities.

For example, the Communications Act:

o affirms the right of franchising authorities, which may be state or
local, depending on the practice in individual states, to award one
or more franchises within their jurisdictions;

o generally prohibits us from operating in communities without a
franchise;

o encourages competition with existing cable systems by:

-- allowing municipalities to operate their own cable systems
without franchises, and

-- preventing franchising authorities from granting exclusive
franchises or from unreasonably refusing to award additional
franchises covering an existing cable system's service area;

o permits local authorities, when granting or renewing our franchises,
to establish requirements for cable-related facilities and
equipment, but prohibits franchising authorities from establishing
requirements for specific video programming or information services
other than in broad categories;

o permits us to obtain modification of our franchise requirements from
the franchise authority or by judicial action if warranted by
commercial impracticability; and

o generally prohibits franchising authorities from:

-- imposing requirements during the initial cable franchising
process or during franchise renewal that require, prohibit or
restrict us from providing telecommunications services,

-- imposing franchise fees on revenues we derived from providing
telecommunications services over our cable systems,

-- restricting our use of any type of subscriber equipment or
transmission technology, and

-- limits our payment of franchise fees to the local franchising
authority to 5.0% of our gross revenues derived from providing
cable services over our cable system.

The Communications Act contains renewal procedures designed to protect us
against arbitrary denials of renewal of our franchises although, under certain
circumstances, the franchising authority could deny us a franchise renewal.
Moreover, even if our franchise is renewed, the franchising authority may seek
to impose upon us new and more onerous requirements, such as significant
upgrades in facilities and services or increased franchise fees as a condition
of renewal. Similarly, if a franchising authority's consent is required for the
purchase or sale of our cable system or franchise, the franchising authority may
attempt to impose more burdensome or onerous franchise requirements on us in
connection with a request for such consent. Historically, cable operators
providing satisfactory services to their subscribers and complying with the
terms of their franchises have almost always obtained franchise renewals. We
believe that we have generally met the terms of our franchises and have provided
quality levels of service. We anticipate that our future franchise renewal
prospects generally will be favorable.


23


Various courts have considered whether franchising authorities have the
legal right to limit the number of franchises awarded within a community and to
impose substantive franchise requirements. These decisions have been
inconsistent and, until the U.S. Supreme Court rules definitively on the scope
of cable operators' First Amendment protections, the legality of the franchising
process generally and of various specific franchise requirements is likely to be
in a state of flux.

Ownership Limitations

The Communications Act generally prohibits us from owning or operating a
satellite master antenna television system or multichannel multipoint
distribution system in any area where we provide franchised cable service and do
not have effective competition, as defined by federal law. We may, however,
acquire and operate a satellite master antenna television system in our existing
franchise service areas if the programming and other services provided to the
satellite master antenna television system subscribers are offered according to
the terms and conditions of our local franchise agreement.

The Communications Act also authorizes the FCC to adopt nationwide limits
on the number of subscribers under the control of a cable operator. The FCC
recently reconsidered its cable ownership regulations and:

o changed its subscriber ownership limit to 30% of subscribers to
multi-channel video programming distributors nationwide, but
maintained its voluntary stay on enforcement of that limitation
pending further action;

o reaffirmed its subscriber ownership information reporting rules that
require any person holding an attributable interest, as defined by
FCC rules, in cable systems reaching 20% or more of homes passed by
cable plant nationwide to notify the FCC of any incremental change
in that person's cable ownership interests;

o retained its 5% voting stock attribution benchmark;

o raised the passive investor voting stock benchmark from 10% to 20%;
and

o adopted a new equity/debt rule that will attribute any interest of
over 33% of the total assets, i.e., debt plus equity, voting or
nonvoting, of an entity.

The Communications Act and FCC regulations also impose limits on the
number of channels that can be occupied on a cable system by a video programmer
in which a cable operator has an interest. A federal district court declared
this provision unconstitutional. An appeal of the district court's decision was
consolidated with an appeal challenging the FCC's subscriber ownership
limitation regulations. The appellate court just recently overturned the FCC's
revised 30% subscriber ownership limitation and the rule regarding the number of
channels on a cable system which can be occupied by programming affiliated with
the cable operator on the basis that they do not pass constitutional muster.
These matters have been sent back to the FCC for further proceedings.

The 1996 amendments to the Communications Act eliminated the statutory
prohibition on the common ownership, operation or control of a cable system and
a television broadcast station in the same service area. The identical FCC
regulation remains in place pending re-examination, although the FCC has
eliminated its regulatory restriction on cross-ownership of cable systems and
national broadcasting networks.

The 1996 amendments to the Communications Act also made far-reaching
changes in the relationship between local telephone companies and cable service
providers. These amendments:

o eliminated federal legal barriers to competition in the local
telephone and cable communications businesses, including allowing
local telephone companies to offer video services in their local
telephone service areas;

o preempted legal barriers to telecommunications competition that
previously existed in state and local laws and regulations;


24


o set basic standards for relationships between telecommunications
providers; and

o generally limited acquisitions and prohibited joint ventures between
local telephone companies and cable operators in the same market.

Local telephone companies may provide service as traditional cable
operators with local franchises or they may opt to provide their programming
over open video systems, subject to certain conditions, including, but not
limited to, setting aside a portion of their channel capacity for use by
unaffiliated program distributors on a non-discriminatory basis. The decision as
whether an operator of an open video system must obtain a local franchise is
left to each community.

Pole Attachment Regulation

The Communications Act requires the FCC to regulate the rates, terms and
conditions imposed by public utilities for cable systems' use of utility pole
and conduit space unless state authorities have demonstrated to the FCC that
they adequately regulate pole attachment rates, as is the case in certain states
in which we operate. In the absence of state regulation, the FCC administers
pole attachment rates on a formula basis. The FCC's current rate formula, which
is being reevaluated by the FCC, governs the maximum rate certain utilities may
charge for attachments to their poles and conduit by cable operators providing
only cable services and until 2001, by certain companies providing
telecommunications services. The FCC also adopted a new rate formula that will
be effective in 2001 and will govern the maximum rate certain utilities may
charge for attachments to their poles and conduit by companies providing
telecommunications services, including cable operators.

Any resulting increase in attachment rates due to the FCC's new rate
formula will be phased in over a five-year period in equal annual increments,
beginning in February 2001. A federal appellate court generally rejected
challenges to these new rules. However, there was one significant exception,
i.e., the court found that the provision of Internet access by a cable system
was neither a cable service or a telecommunications service, thus the FCC lacked
authority to regulate pole attachment rates for cable systems which offer
Internet access. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear an appeal from this
decision. We are unable to predict the ultimate impact of any revised FCC rate
formula or of any new pole attachment rate regulations on our business and
operations.

Other Regulatory Requirements of the Communications Act and the FCC

The FCC has adopted cable inside wiring rules to provide a more specific
procedure for the disposition of residential home wiring and internal building
wiring that belongs to an incumbent cable operator that is forced by the
building owner to terminate its cable services in a building with multiple
dwelling units. The FCC is also considering additional rules relating to inside
wiring that, if adopted, may disadvantage incumbent cable operators.

The Communications Act includes provisions, among others, regulating and
the FCC actively regulates other parts of our cable operations, involving such
areas as:

o equal employment opportunity;

o consumer protection and customer service;

o technical standards and testing of cable facilities;

o consumer electronics equipment compatibility;

o registration of cable systems;


25


o maintenance of various records and public inspection files;

o microwave frequency usage; and

o antenna structure notification, marking and lighting.

The FCC may enforce its regulations through the imposition of fines, the
issuance of cease and desist orders or the imposition of other administrative
sanctions, such as the revocation of FCC licenses needed to operate transmission
facilities often used in connection with cable operations. The FCC has ongoing
rulemaking proceedings that may change its existing rules or lead to new
regulations. We are unable to predict the impact that any further FCC rule
changes may have on our business and operations.

Other bills and administrative proposals pertaining to cable
communications have previously been introduced in Congress or considered by
other governmental bodies over the past several years. It is probable that
Congress and other governmental bodies will make further attempts relating to
the regulation of cable communications services.

Copyright

Our cable systems typically include in their channel line-ups local and
distant television and radio broadcast signals, which are protected by the
copyright laws. We generally do not obtain a license to use this programming
directly from the owners of the programming, but instead comply with an
alternative federal compulsory copyright licensing process. In exchange for
filing certain reports and contributing a percentage of our revenues to a
federal copyright royalty pool, we obtain blanket permission to retransmit the
copyrighted material carried on these broadcast signals. The nature and amount
of future copyright payments for broadcast signal carriage cannot be predicted
at this time.

In a report to Congress, the U.S. Copyright Office recommended that
Congress make major revisions to both the cable television and satellite
compulsory licenses. Congress recently modified the satellite compulsory license
in a manner that permits DBS providers to become more competitive with cable
operators like us. The possible simplification, modification or elimination of
the cable communications compulsory copyright license is the subject of
continuing legislative review. The elimination or substantial modification of
the cable compulsory license could adversely affect our ability to obtain
suitable programming and could substantially increase the cost of programming
that remains available for distribution to our subscribers. We are unable to
predict the outcome of this legislative activity.

Copyrighted music performed in programming supplied to cable television
systems by pay cable networks and basic cable networks is licensed by the
networks through private agreements with the American Society of Composers and
Publishers, commonly referred to as ASCAP, and BMI, Inc., the two major
performing rights organizations in the United States. Both the American Society
of Composers and Publishers and BMI offer through to the viewer licenses to the
cable networks which cover the retransmission of the cable networks' programming
by cable television systems to their customers.

Our cable systems also utilize music in other programming and advertising
that we provide to subscribers. The rights to use this music are controlled by
various music performing rights organizations from which performance licenses
must be obtained. Although we cannot predict the amount of any license fees we
may be required to pay for future use of music, we do not believe such license
fees will be significant to our financial position, results of operations or
liquidity.


26


State and Local Regulation

Our cable systems use local streets and rights-of-way. Consequently, we
must comply with state and local regulation, which is typically imposed through
the franchising process. Our cable systems generally are operated in accordance
with non-exclusive franchises, permits or licenses granted by a municipality or
other state or local government entity. Our franchises generally are granted for
fixed terms and in many cases are terminable if we fail to comply with material
provisions. The terms and conditions of our franchises vary materially from
jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Each franchise generally contains provisions
governing:

o franchise fees;

o franchise term;

o system construction and maintenance obligations;

o system channel capacity;

o design and technical performance;

o customer service standards;

o sale or transfer of the franchise;

o territory of the franchise;

o indemnification of the franchising authority;

o use and occupancy of public streets; and

o types of cable services provided.

A number of states subject cable systems to the jurisdiction of
centralized state governmental agencies, some of which impose regulation of a
character similar to that of a public utility. Attempts in other states to
regulate cable systems are continuing and can be expected to increase. To date,
other than Delaware, no state in which we operate has enacted such state-level
regulation. State and local franchising jurisdiction is not unlimited; however,
it must be exercised consistently with federal law. The Communications Act
immunizes franchising authorities from monetary damage awards arising from
regulation of cable systems or decisions made on franchise grants, renewals,
transfers and amendments.

The foregoing describes all material present and proposed federal, state
and local regulations and legislation affecting the cable industry. Other
existing federal regulations, copyright licensing, and, in many jurisdictions,
state and local franchise requirements, are currently the subject of judicial
proceedings, legislative hearings and administrative proposals which could
change, in varying degrees, the manner in which cable systems operate. Neither
the outcome of these proceedings nor their impact upon the cable industry or our
cable operations can be predicted at this time.


27


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our principal physical assets consist of cable television operating plant
and equipment, including signal receiving, encoding and decoding devices,
headend facilities and distribution systems and equipment at or near customers'
homes for each of the systems. The signal receiving apparatus typically includes
a tower, antenna, ancillary electronic equipment and earth stations for
reception of satellite signals. Headend facilities are located near the
receiving devices. Some basic subscribers of the systems utilize converters that
can be addressed by sending coded signals from the headend facility over the
cable network. Our distribution system consists primarily of coaxial and fiber
optic cables and related electronic equipment.

We own the real property housing our regional call centers in Gulf Breeze,
Florida; Chillicothe, Illinois; and Waseca, Minnesota as well as numerous
locations for business offices and warehouses throughout our operating regions.
We lease space for our other regional call centers in Benton, Kentucky; and
Hendersonville, North Carolina. We also lease additional locations for business
offices and warehouses throughout our operating regions. Our headend facilities,
signal reception sites and microwave facilities are located on owned and leased
parcels of land, and we generally own the towers on which certain of our
equipment is located. We own most of our service vehicles. We believe that our
properties both owned and leased, are in good condition and are suitable and
adequate for our operations.

Our cable television plant and related equipment generally are attached to
utility poles under pole rental agreements with local public utilities, although
in some areas the distribution cable is buried in underground ducts or trenches.
The physical components of the systems require maintenance and periodic
upgrading to improve system performance and capacity.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On November 3, 2000, MCC resolved litigation brought against it by Grey
Advertising, Inc. ("Grey") in January 2000. MCC and Grey entered into a final
settlement agreement that involves no monetary payments by either party and that
permits MCC and its subsidiaries to continue to use the name "Mediacom" in
accordance with the terms of their confidential agreement.

There are no other material pending legal proceedings to which we are a
party or to which any of our properties are subject.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth
quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.


28


PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS' COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

There is no public trading market for our equity, all of which is held by
MCC.


29


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

In the table below, we provide you with:

o selected historical financial data for the period from January 1,
1996 through March 11, 1996, which are derived from the audited
financial statements of Benchmark Acquisition Fund II Limited
Partnership, which is our predecessor company; and

o selected historical consolidated financial and operating data for
the period from the commencement of our operations on March 12, 1996
through December 31, 1996 and for the years ended December 31, 1997,
1998, 1999 and 2000 and balance sheet data as of December 31, 1996,
1997, 1998, 1999 and 2000 which are derived from our audited
consolidated financial statements.

We commenced operations on March 12, 1996 with the acquisition of a cable
system from Benchmark Acquisition Fund II Limited Partnership and have since
completed 19 additional acquisitions as of December 31, 2000. The historical
results of operations of the systems acquired have been included from their
respective dates of acquisition to the end of the period presented.

Mediacom LLC was formed as a New York limited liability company in July
1995 and since that time our taxable income or loss has been included in the
federal and certain state income tax returns of our members.

See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations."


30


SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA



Predecessor Mediacom LLC
--------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------
January 1 March 12 Year Year Year Year
Through Through Ended Ended Ended Ended
March 11, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31, December 31,
1996 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
--------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --------
(dollars in thousands)

Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues $ 1,038 $ 5,411 $ 17,634 $ 129,297 $ 176,052 $ 332,050
Costs and expenses:
Service costs 297 1,511 5,547 43,849 58,058 114,234
Selling, general and
administrative expenses 222 931 2,696 25,596 32,949 55,820
Management fee expense(1) 52 270 882 5,797 6,951 6,029
Depreciation and
amortization 527 2,157 7,636 65,793 101,065 177,928
Non-cash stock charges(2) - - - - 15,445 28,254
--------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --------
Operating income (loss) (60) 542 873 (11,738) (38,416) (50,215)
Interest expense, net(3) 201 1,528 4,829 23,994 37,817 68,973
Other expenses(4) - 967 640 4,058 5,087 30,036
--------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --------
Net loss $ (261) $ (1,953) $ (4,596) $ (39,790) $ (81,320) $ (149,224)
========= ========= ========== ========== =========== ========

Balance Sheet Data
(end of period):
Total assets $ 46,560 $ 102,791 $ 451,152 $ 1,272,881 $ 1,375,772
Total debt 40,529 72,768 337,905 1,139,000 987,000
Total members' equity 4,537 24,441 78,651 54,615 262,997

Supplementary Data:
System cash flow(5) $ 519 $ 2,969 $ 9,391 $ 59,852 $ 85,045 $ 161,996
System cash flow margin(6) 50.0% 54.9% 53.3% 46.3% 48.3% 48.8%
EBITDA(7) $ 467 $ 2,699 $ 8,509 $ 54,055 $ 78,094 $ 155,967
EBITDA margin(8) 45.0% 49.9% 48.3% 41.8% 44.4% 47.0%
Net cash flows provided by
operating activities $ 226 $ 237 $ 7,007 $ 53,556 $ 54,216 $ 93,218
Net cash flows used in
investing activities (86) (45,257) (60,008) (397,085) (851,548) (295,613)
Net cash flows provided by
financing activities - 45,416 53,632 344,714 799,593 202,015

Operating Data
(end of period, except
average):
Homes passed(9) 38,749 87,750 520,000 1,071,500 1,173,000
Basic subscribers(10) 27,153 64,350 354,000 719,000 779,000
Basic penetration(11) 70.1% 73.3% 68.1% 67.1% 66.4%
Premium service units(12) 11,691 39,288 407,100 587,000 597,000
Premium penetration(13) 43.1% 61.1% 115.0% 81.6% 76.6%
Average monthly revenues per
basic subscriber(14) $ 32.11 $ 32.88 $ 35.52 $ 38.45


(notes on following page)


31


Notes to Selected Financial Data

(1) Represents fees paid to Mediacom Management Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, for management services rendered to our operating
subsidiaries. Mediacom Management utilized these fees to compensate its
employees as well as to fund its corporate overhead. The management
agreements with Mediacom Management were amended effective November 19,
1999 in connection with an amendment to our operating agreement. The
amended agreements provided for management fees equal to 2% of annual
gross revenues. The management agreements were terminated upon the
completion of MCC's initial public offering in February 2000 and were
replaced with new agreements between MCC and our operating subsidiaries.
See Notes 7 and 12 of our consolidated financial statements.

(2) The non-cash stock charges for the year ended December 31, 2000 consist of
a one-time $24.5 million charge resulting from the termination of the
management agreements with Mediacom Management upon completion of MCC's
initial public offering in February 2000 and a $3.8 million charge related
to the vesting of equity grants made during 1999 to certain members of our
management team. Non-cash stock charges for the year ended December 31,
1999 consist of a $628,000 charge resulting from amendments to our
management agreements with Mediacom Management and a $14.8 million charge
related to the vesting of equity grants to certain members of our
management team. See Notes 7 and 11 of our consolidated financial
statements.

(3) Net of interest income. Interest income for the periods presented was not
material.

(4) Includes a $28.5 million non-cash charge recorded during the year ended
December 31, 2000, relating to the decline in value of our investment in
shares of SoftNet Systems, Inc. common stock that was considered other
than temporary. See Note 10 of our consolidated financial statements.

(5) Represents EBITDA, as defined in note 7 below, before management fee
expense. System cash flow:

o is not intended to be a performance measure that should be regarded
as an alternative either to operating income or net income as an
indicator of operating performance or to the statement of cash flows
as a measure of liquidity;

o is not intended to represent funds available for debt service,
dividends, reinvestment or other discretionary uses; and

o should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
measures of performance prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.

System cash flow is included in this report because our management
believes that system cash flow is a meaningful measure of performance
commonly used in the cable television industry and by the investment
community to analyze and compare cable television companies. Our
definition of system cash flow may not be identical to similarly titled
measures reported by other companies.

(6) Represents system cash flow as a percentage of revenues. This measurement
is used by us, and is commonly used in the cable television industry, to
analyze and compare cable television companies on the basis of operating
performance, for the reasons discussed in note 5 above.

(7) Represents operating income (loss) before depreciation and amortization
and non-cash stock charges. EBITDA:

o is not intended to be a performance measure that should be regarded
as an alternative either to operating income or net income as an
indicator of operating performance or to the statement of cash flows
as a measure of liquidity;

o is not intended to represent funds available for debt service,
dividends, reinvestment or other discretionary uses; and

o should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
measures of performance prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.


32


EBITDA is included in this report because our management believes that
EBITDA is a meaningful measure of performance commonly used in the cable
television industry and by the investment community to analyze and compare
cable television companies. Our definition of EBITDA may not be identical
to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

(8) Represents EBITDA as a percentage of revenues. This measurement is used by
us, and is commonly used in the cable television industry, to analyze and
compare cable television companies on the basis of operating performance,
for the reasons discussed in note 7 above.

(9) Represents the number of single residence homes, apartments and
condominium units passed by the cable distribution network in a cable
system's service area.

(10) Represents subscribers of a cable television system who receive a package
of over-the-air broadcast stations, local access channels or certain
satellite-delivered cable television services and who are usually charged
a flat monthly rate for a number of channels.

(11) Represents basic subscribers as a percentage of total number of homes
passed.

(12) Represents the number of subscriptions to premium services. A subscriber
may purchase more than one premium service, each of which is counted as a
separate premium service unit.

(13) Represents premium service units as a percentage of total number of basic
subscribers. This ratio may be greater than 100% if the average basic
subscriber subscribes to more than one premium service unit.

(14) Represents average monthly revenues for the last three months of the
period divided by average basic subscribers for such period. Average
monthly revenues per basic subscriber includes the revenues of
acquisitions of cable systems made during the last three months of the
period as if such acquisitions were completed at the beginning of the
three month period. This measurement is commonly used in the cable
television industry to analyze and compare cable television companies on
the basis of operating performance.


33


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Reference is made to the "Risk Factors" below for a discussion of
important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expectations
and any of our forward-looking statements contained herein. In some cases, you
can identify those so-called "forward-looking statements" by words such as
"may," "will," "should," "expects," "plans," "anticipates," "believes,"
"estimates," "predicts," "potential," or "continue" or the negative of those
words and other comparable words. In addition, the following discussion should
be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements as of
and for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998.

Introduction

We do not believe the discussion and analysis of our historical financial
condition and results of operations set forth below are indicative nor should
they be relied upon as an indicator of our future performance because of certain
significant past events. Those events include numerous acquisitions and several
financing transactions.

Organization

We were organized as a New York limited liability company in July 1995 and
serve as a holding company for our operating subsidiaries. Mediacom Capital
Corporation, our wholly-owned subsidiary, was organized as a New York
corporation in March 1998 for the sole purpose of acting as our co-issuer of
public debt securities and does not conduct operations of its own. Mediacom
Communications Corporation ("MCC") was organized as a Delaware corporation in
November 1999 and completed an initial public offering in February 2000.
Immediately prior to the completion of MCC's initial public offering, MCC issued
shares of its common stock in exchange for all of our outstanding membership
interests and became our sole member and manager.

Until MCC's initial public offering in February 2000, Mediacom Management
Corporation, a Delaware corporation, provided management services to our
operating subsidiaries and received annual management fees. Mediacom Management
utilized these fees to compensate its employees as well as to fund its corporate
overhead. Such management fees ranged from 4.0% to 5.0% of our annual gross
revenues until November 19, 1999. On such date, the management agreements with
Mediacom Management were amended in connection with an amendment to our
operating agreement to provide for annual management fees equal to 2.0% of
annual gross revenues. As part of this amendment, Mediacom Management waived all
management fees incurred from July 1, 1999 through November 19, 1999 by our
operating subsidiaries. The management agreements were terminated upon the date
of MCC's initial public offering and were replaced with new agreements between
MCC and our operating subsidiaries. At that time, Mediacom Management's
employees became MCC's employees. See Notes 7 and 12 to our consolidated
financial statements.

Acquisitions

We significantly expanded our business in the last three years through
acquisitions. All acquisitions have been accounted for under the purchase method
of accounting and, therefore, our historical results of operations include the
results of operations for each acquired system subsequent to its respective
acquisition date. In 1998, we completed three acquisitions of cable systems
serving a total of 295,700 basic subscribers as of December 31, 2000 (the "1998
Acquisitions"). In 1999, we completed two acquisitions of cable systems serving
a total of 363,800 basic subscribers as of December 31, 2000 (the "1999
Acquisitions"). In 2000, we completed nine acquisitions of cable systems serving
a total of 53,000 basic subscribers as of December 31, 2000 (the "2000
Acquisitions").


34


The following table sets forth information on the acquisitions we
completed in 1998, 1999 and 2000.



Basic Subscribers
Purchase Price as of
Predecessor Owner Acquisition Date (in millions) December 31, 2000
- ----------------- ---------------- ------------- -----------------

Jones Intercable, Inc. January 1998 $ 21.4 18,500
Cablevision Systems Corporation January 1998 308.2 273,200
Cablevision Systems Corporation (Caruthersville) October 1998 5.0 4,000
Zylstra Communications Corporation October 1999 19.5 14,000
Triax Midwest Associates, L.P. November 1999 740.1 349,800
Rapid Communications Partners, L.P. April 2000 8.0 6,000
MidAmerican Cable Systems, L.P. April 2000 8.0 5,000
TriCable, Inc May 2000 1.8 1,000
Spirit Lake Cable TV, Inc. June 2000 10.8 5,000
South Kentucky Services Corporation July 2000 2.1 1,000
Dowden Midwest Cable Partners, L.P. August 2000 1.2 1,000
Illinet Communications of Central Illinois, LLC October 2000 15.8 8,000
Satellite Cable Services, Inc. October 2000 27.5 12,000
AT&T Broadband, LLC December 2000 34.0 14,000
---------- -------
$ 1,203.4 712,500
========== =======


Pending AT&T Acquisitions

On February 26, 2001, MCC entered into agreements with AT&T Broadband, LLC
to acquire cable systems serving approximately 840,000 basic subscribers in
Georgia, Illinois, Iowa and Missouri, for an aggregate purchase price of $2.215
billion in cash, subject to closing adjustments. Among the AT&T systems' largest
clusters are communities such as: Albany, Columbus, Tifton and Valdosta,
Georgia; Charleston, Carbondale, Effingham, Marion, Moline and Rock Island,
Illinois; Ames, Cedar Rapids, Clinton, Davenport, Des Moines, Dubuque, Fort
Dodge, Iowa City, Mason City and Waterloo, Iowa; and Columbia, Jefferson City
and Springfield, Missouri. MCC expects to fund these acquisitions through a
combination of new debt and equity financings and borrowings under our existing
subsidiary credit facilities. These pending transactions are expected to close
in the second or third quarter of 2001, subject to customary closing conditions
and the receipt of regulatory and other approvals.

Unless otherwise stated in this Annual Report, the operating and financial
data contained herein do not include the effect of the pending AT&T
transactions.

General

For each of the past three years, we have generated significant increases
in revenues principally as a result of our acquisition activities and increases
in monthly revenues per basic subscriber. Approximately 92.3% of our revenues
for the year ended December 31, 2000 are attributable to monthly subscription
fees charged to customers for our core cable television services, including
basic, expanded basic and premium programming, digital cable television
programming services, cable modem service, wire maintenance, equipment rental
and services to commercial establishments provided by our cable systems. The
remaining 7.7% of revenue represents pay-per-view charges, installation and
reconnection fees, late payment fees, advertising revenues and other ancillary
revenues. Franchise fees charged to customers are also included in their
corresponding revenue category.

Our operating expenses consist of service costs and selling, general and
administrative expenses directly attributable to our cable systems. Service
costs include fees paid to programming suppliers, expenses related to copyright
fees, wages and salaries of technical personnel and plant operating costs.
Programming costs have historically increased at rates in excess of inflation
due to increases in the number of programming services we have offered and
improvements in the quality of programming. We believe that under the Federal
Communication


35


Commission's existing cable rate regulations, we will be able to increase our
rates for cable television services to more than cover any increases in the
programming costs. However, competitive factors may limit our ability to
increase our rates. We benefit from our membership in a cooperative of cable
television companies which serves over twelve million basic subscribers and
which provides its members with volume discounts from programming suppliers and
cable equipment vendors. Selling, general and administrative expenses directly
attributable to our cable television systems include wages and salaries for
customer service and administrative personnel, franchise fees and expenses
related to billing, marketing, bad debt, advertising sales and office
administration. Management fee expense reflects fees paid to MCC for management
services rendered to the Company's operating subsidiaries.

The high level of depreciation and amortization associated with our
acquisition activities and capital investment program, as well as the interest
expense related to our financing activities, have caused us to report net losses
in our limited operating history. We believe that such net losses are common for
cable television companies and anticipate that we will continue to incur net
losses for the foreseeable future.

EBITDA represents operating loss before depreciation and amortization and
non-cash stock charges. EBITDA:

o is not intended to be a performance measure that should be regarded
as an alternative either to operating income or net income as an
indicator of operating performance, or to the statement of cash
flows as a measure of liquidity;

o is not intended to represent funds available for debt service,
dividends, reinvestment or other discretionary uses; and

o should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for
measures of performance prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.

EBITDA is included herein because our management believes that EBITDA is a
meaningful measure of performance as it is commonly used by the cable television
industry and by the investment community to analyze and compare cable television
companies. Our definition of EBITDA may not be identical to similarly titled
measures reported by other companies.

Actual Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999

The following historical information includes the results of operations of
the 1999 Acquisitions and the 2000 Acquisitions (together, the "1999-2000
Acquisitions"), only for that portion of the respective period that such cable
systems were owned by us.

Revenues. Revenues increased 88.6% to $332.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2000 as compared to $176.1 million for the prior year. Of the
revenue increase of $156.0 million, $137.8 was attributable to the 1999-2000
Acquisitions. Excluding the 1999-2000 Acquisitions, revenues increased 11.9%
primarily due to basic rate increases associated with new programming
introductions in our core cable television services and to customer growth in
our recently launched digital cable and high-speed Internet access services.

Service costs. Service costs increased 96.8% to $114.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2000 as compared to $58.1 million for the prior year.
The 1999-2000 Acquisitions accounted for $48.2 million of the total increase.
Excluding the 1999-2000 Acquisitions, these costs increased 16.1% primarily as a
result of higher programming expenses, including the cost of additional channel
offerings to our basic subscribers. As a percentage of revenues, service costs
were 34.4% for the year ended December 31, 2000, as compared with 33.0% for the
prior year.

Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased 69.4% to $55.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2000 as compared to $32.9 million for the prior year. The 1999-2000
Acquisitions accounted for $21.5 million of the total increase. Excluding the
1999-2000 Acquisitions, these costs increased 4.6%. As a percentage of revenues,
selling, general and administrative expenses were 16.8% for the year ended
December 31, 2000, as compared with 18.7% for the prior year.


36


Management fee expense. Management fee expense decreased 13.3% to $6.0
million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared to $7.0 million for the
prior year. As a percentage of revenues, management fee expense was 1.8% for the
year ended December 31, 2000 as compared with 3.9% for the prior year. The
decrease in management fee expense was primarily due to higher amounts charged
by Mediacom Management during the year ended December 31, 1999 under management
agreements between Mediacom Management and our operating subsidiaries. Such
management agreements were terminated on the date of MCC's initial public
offering in February 2000 and were replaced with new agreements between MCC and
our operating subsidiaries. See Notes 7 and 12 of our consolidated financial
statements.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased
76.1% to $177.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared to
$101.1 million in the prior year. This increase was due to our purchase of the
1999-2000 Acquisitions and additional capital expenditures associated with the
upgrade of our cable systems.

Non-cash stock charges. Non-cash stock charges increased 82.9% to $28.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared to $15.4 million in the
prior year. The non-cash charges in 2000 consist of a one-time $24.5 million
charge resulting from the termination of the management agreements with Mediacom
Management on the date of MCC's initial public offering and a $3.8 million
charge related to the vesting of equity grants made to certain members of our
management team during 1999. Non-cash stock charges for the year ended December
31, 1999 consist of a $628,000 charge resulting from amendments to our
management agreements with Mediacom Management and a $14.8 million charge relatd
to the vesting of equity grants to certain members of our management team. See
Notes 7 and 11 of our consolidated financial statements.

Operating loss. Due to the factors described above, we generated an
operating loss of $50.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2000, as
compared to an operating loss of $38.4 million for the year ended December 31,
1999.

Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net, increased 82.4% to $69.0
million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared to $37.8 million for
the prior year. This increase was substantially due to higher average debt
outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2000 as a result of the
indebtedness incurred in connection with the purchase of the 1999-2000
Acquisitions and to fund capital expenditures.

Other expenses. Other expenses increased 490.4% to $30.0 million for the
year ended December 31, 2000 as compared to $5.1 million for the prior year.
This change was principally due to a non-cash loss of $28.5 million resulting
from, the decline in value of our investment in shares of SoftNet Systems, Inc.
common stock that was deemed other than temporary. See Note 10 of our
consolidated financial statements.

Net loss. Due to the factors described above, we generated a net loss of
$149.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared to a net loss of
$81.3 million for the prior year.

EBITDA. EBITDA increased 99.7% to $156.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2000 as compared to $78.1 million for the prior year. This increase
was substantially due to the reasons noted above. As a percentage of revenues,
EBITDA increased to 47.0% for the year ended December 31, 2000, compared to
44.4% for the prior year.

Year Ended December 31, 1999 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1998

The following historical information includes the results of operations of
the 1998 Acquisitions and the 1999 Acquisitions (together, the "1998-1999
Acquisitions"), only for that portion of the respective period that such cable
systems were owned by us.

Revenues. Revenues increased 36.2% to $176.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 1999, as compared to $129.3 million for the prior year. The
1998-1999 Acquisitions accounted for $43.0 million of the total increase.
Excluding the 1998-1999 Acquisitions, revenues increased 13.9% primarily due to
basic rate increases associated with new programming introductions in our core
cable television services and to internal basic subscriber growth of 1.9%.

Service costs. Service costs increased 32.4% to $58.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 1999, as compared to $43.8 million for the prior year. The
1998-1999 Acquisitions accounted for $12.8 million of the total increase.
Excluding the 1998-1999 Acquisitions, these costs increased 18.8% primarily as a
result of higher programming costs. As a percentage of revenues, service costs
were 33.0% for the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared to 33.9% for the
prior year.


37


Selling, general and administrative expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased 28.7% to $32.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 1999, as compared to $25.6 million for the prior year. The
1998-1999 Acquisitions accounted for $7.1 million of the total increase.
Excluding the 1998-1999 Acquisitions, these costs increased 5.5% primarily due
to increased marketing costs associated with the promotion of new programming
services and increased personnel expenses. As a percentage of revenues, selling,
general and administrative expenses were 18.7% for the year ended December 31,
1999, as compared to 19.8% for the prior year.

Management fee expense. Management fee expense increased 19.9% to $7.0
million for the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared to $5.8 million for
the prior year, due to the higher revenues generated in the 1999 period. The
management agreements were amended on November 19, 1999 in connection with an
amendment to Mediacom LLC's operating agreement to provide annual management
fees equal to 2.0% of annual gross revenues. See Note 7 of our consolidated
financial statements.

Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization increased
53.6% to $101.1 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared to
$65.8 million for the prior year. This increase was substantially due to our
purchase of the 1999 Acquisitions and additional capital expenditures associated
with the upgrade of our cable systems.

Non-cash stock charges. Non-cash stock charges were $15.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 1999. These non-cash charges resulted from amendments to
our management agreements with Mediacom Management and a grant of equity
interests to certain members of our management team. See Notes 7 and 11 of our
consolidated financial statements.

Operating loss. Due to the factors described above, we generated an
operating loss of $38.4 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, as
compared to an operating loss of $11.7 million for the prior year.

Interest expense, net. Interest expense, net, increased 57.6% to $37.8
million for the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared to $24.0 million for
the prior year. This increase was substantially due to higher average debt
outstanding during the 1999 period as a result of the indebtedness incurred in
connection with the purchase of the 1999 Acquisitions and to fund capital
expenditures.

Other expenses. Other expenses increased 25.4% to $5.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 1999, as compared to $4.1 million for the prior year.
This increase was principally due to acquisition fees payable to Mediacom
Management in 1999 relating to the 1999 Acquisitions.

Net loss. Due to the factors described above, we generated a net loss of
$81.3 million for the year ended December 31, 1999, as compared to a net loss of
$39.8 million for the prior year.

EBITDA. EBITDA increased 44.5% to $78.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 1999, as compared to $54.1 million for the prior year. This
increase was substantially due to the reasons noted above. As a percentage of
revenues, EBITDA increased to 44.4% for the year ended December 31, 1999, as
compared to 41.8% for the prior year.


38


Selected Pro Forma Results

We report the results of operations of the 1999-2000 Acquisitions from the
date of their respective acquisition. The financial information below for the
years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 presents selected unaudited pro forma
operating results assuming the purchase of the Acquired Systems had been
consummated on January 1, 1999. This financial information is not necessarily
indicative of what results would have been had we operated these cable systems
since the beginning of 1999.



Years Ended December 31,
------------------------
2000 1999
---- ----
(dollars in thousands, except
per subscriber data)

Revenues........................................... $ 348,391 $ 318,086

Costs and expenses:
Service costs................................... 120,578 108,049
SG&A expenses................................... 58,552 56,718
Management fee expense.......................... 6,029 11,175
Depreciation and amortization................... 185,498 165,712
Non-cash stock charges.......................... 28,254 15,445
--------- ---------
Operating loss..................................... $ (50,520) $ (39,013)
========= =========
Other Data:
EBITDA............................................. 163,232 142,144
EBITDA margin (1).................................. 46.9% 44.7%
Basic subscribers (2).............................. 779,000 770,600
Average monthly revenue per basic subscriber (3)... $ 38.45 $ 35.39


- ----------
(1) Represents EBITDA as a percentage of revenues.
(2) At end of the period.
(3) Represents average monthly revenues for the last three months of the
period divided by average basic subscribers for the period.

Selected Pro Forma Results for Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to
Selected Pro Forma Results for Year Ended December 31, 1999

Revenues increased 9.5% to $348.4 million for the year ended December 31,
2000, as compared to $318.1 million for the prior year. This increase was
attributable principally to internal subscriber growth of 1.1%, basic rate
increases associated with new programming introductions in our core cable
television services and to customer growth in our recently launched digital
cable and high-speed Internet access services.

Service costs and selling, general and administrative expenses in the
aggregate increased 8.7% to $179.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2000
from $164.8 million for the prior year, principally due to higher programming
costs.

Management fee expense decreased 46.0% to $6.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2000 from $11.2 million for the prior year. This decrease was
primarily attributable to the reduction of the 1999 Acquisitions' management fee
expense subsequent to their acquisition and the termination of management
agreements between Mediacom Management and our operating subsidiaries. Such
management agreements were terminated on the date of MCC's initial public
offering in February 2000 and were replaced with new management agreements
between MCC and our operating subsidiaries. As a percentage of revenues,
management fee expense was 1.7% for the year ended December 31, 2000 as compared
with 3.5% for the prior year.


39


Depreciation and amortization increased 11.9% to $185.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2000 from $165.7 million for the prior year. This
increase was principally due to capital expenditures associated with the upgrade
of our cable systems. Non-cash stock charges were as reported above.

As a result of the above factors, we generated an operating loss of $50.5
million for the year ended December 31, 2000, compared to $39.0 million for the
prior year.

EBITDA increased by 14.8% to $163.2 million for the year ended December
31, 2000 from $142.1 million for the prior year. The EBITDA margin improved to
46.9% for the year ended December 31, 2000 from 44.7% for the year ended
December 31, 1999.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our business requires substantial capital for the upgrade, expansion and
maintenance of our cable network. In addition, we have pursued, and will
continue to pursue, a business strategy that includes selective acquisitions. We
have funded and will continue to fund our working capital requirements, capital
expenditures and acquisitions through a combination of internally generated
funds, long-term borrowings and equity financings.

Investing Activities

Our capital expenditures were $182.6 million, $86.7 million and $53.7
million for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively. The
higher capital expenditures in 2000 reflect the significant investments we are
making in the 1999-2000 Acquisitions and our accelerated network upgrade
program. As of December 31, 2000, as a result of our cumulative capital
investment in the network upgrade program, including the 2000 Acquisitions,
approximately 74% of our cable network was upgraded with 550MHz to 750MHz
bandwidth capacity and approximately 47% of our homes passed were activated with
two-way communications capability. At year-end 2000, our digital cable service
was available to approximately 400,000 basic subscribers, and our cable modem
service was launched in cable systems with 486,000 homes passed.

We plan to continue our aggressive cable network upgrade program and
expect that 90% of our cable network will be upgraded with 550MHz to 870MHz
bandwidth capacity and 80% of our homes passed will have two-way communications
capability by year-end 2001. At the same period end, we expect to offer digital
cable service to 550,000 basic subscribers and to launch cable modem service in
cable systems with 800,000 homes passed. By year-end 2001, we expect to serve
between 90,000 and 100,000 digital cable customers and between 45,000 and 50,000
data customers. To achieve these targets and to fund other requirements,
including new plant construction, headend eliminations, regional fiber
interconnections and network maintenance, we expect to invest between $180.0
million and $200.0 million in capital expenditures in 2001.

In 1998, we completed three acquisitions of cable systems that served
approximately 295,700 basic subscribers as of December 31, 2000, for an
aggregate purchase price of $334.6 million. In 1999, we completed two
acquisitions of cable systems that served approximately 363,800 basic
subscribers as of December 31, 2000, for an aggregate purchase price of $759.6
million. In 2000, we completed nine acquisitions of cable systems that served
approximately 53,000 basic subscribers as of December 31, 2000, for an aggregate
purchase price of $109.2 million.

On February 26, 2001, MCC entered into agreements with AT&T Broadband, LLC
to acquire cable systems serving approximately 840,000 basic subscribers in
Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri, for an aggregate purchase price of $2.215
billion in cash, subject to closing adjustments. MCC expects to fund these
acquisitions through a combination of new debt and equity financings and
borrowings under our existing subsidiary credit facilities. These transactions
are expected to close in the second or third quarter of 2001, subject to
customary closing conditions and the receipt of regulatory and other approvals.


40


Financing Activities

To finance our prior acquisitions and our network upgrade program and to
provide liquidity for future capital needs, during the past three years we
completed the following financing arrangements:

o $200.0 million offering of our 8 1/2% senior notes due April 2008;

o $125.0 million offering of our 7 7/8% senior notes due February
2011;

o $550.0 million subsidiary credit facilities expiring in September
2008;

o $550.0 million subsidiary credit facilities expiring in December
2008;

o $104.5 million of equity capital contributed by our members; and

o $354.5 million of equity capital contributed by MCC in February
2000.

The final maturities of our subsidiary credit facilities are subject to
earlier repayment on dates ranging from June 2007 to December 2007 if we do not
refinance our 8 1/2% senior notes prior to March 31, 2007. As of December 31,
2000, we were in compliance with all of the financial and other covenants in our
subsidiary credit facilities and our public debt indentures. As of December 31,
2000, we had approximately $436.6 million of unused credit commitments under our
subsidiary credit facilities.

As of December 31, 2000, we entered into interest rate swap agreements,
which expire from 2002 through 2004, to hedge $170.0 million of floating rate
debt under our subsidiary credit facilities. As a result of these interest rate
swap agreements, 50% of our outstanding indebtedness was at fixed interest rates
or subject to interest rate protection on such date. After giving effect to
these interest rate swap agreements, as of December 31, 2000, our weighted
average cost of indebtedness was approximately 8.2%.

Debt leverage and interest coverage ratios are commonly used in the cable
television industry to measure liquidity and financial condition. For the three
month period ended December 31, 2000, our debt leverage ratio (defined as total
debt at the end of the period, divided by pro forma annualized EBITDA for the
period) was 5.9x and our interest coverage ratio (defined as EBITDA divided by
interest expense, net for the period) was 2.3x.

On January 24, 2001, we and Mediacom Capital completed an offering of
$500.0 million of 9 1/2% senior notes due January 2013. Interest on the 9 1/2%
senior notes will be payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of each
year, commencing on July 15, 2001. Approximately $467.5 million of the net
proceeds were used to repay a substantial portion of the indebtedness
outstanding under our subsidiary credit facilities and related accrued interest.
The balance of the net proceeds is being used for general corporate purposes.
After giving effect to this senior note offering and the use of proceeds
therefrom, as of March 22, 2001, our unused credit commitments under our
subsidiary credit facilities were approximately $900.0 million.

On February 7, 2001, we and Mediacom Capital filed a registration
statement with the SEC under which we may sell debt securities for a maximum
amount of $1.0 billion. The SEC declared this registration statement effective
on February 13, 2001.

Although we have not generated earnings sufficient to cover fixed charges,
we have generated cash and obtained financing sufficient to meet our debt
service, working capital, capital expenditure and acquisition requirements. We
expect that we will continue to be able to generate funds and obtain financing
sufficient to service our obligations and complete our pending and future
acquisitions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain
sufficient financing, or, if we were able to do so, that the terms would be
favorable to us.


41


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 1998, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 ("SFAS
133"), "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," was
issued effective January 1, 2001. This statement establishes the accounting and
reporting standards for derivatives and hedging activity. Upon adoption of SFAS
133, all derivatives are required to be recognized in the statement of financial
position as either assets or liabilities and measured at fair value. We estimate
the impact of the adoption of SFAS 133, as amended, will result in an after tax
charge of approximately $1.6 million which will be reflected as a change in
accounting principle in 2001.

In March 1999, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 ("SAB
101"). SAB 101 summarizes certain areas of the SEC's views in applying generally
accepted accounting principles to revenue recognition in financial statements.
SAB 101 does not apply to our basic cable television business. We will continue
to account for revenues based upon Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 51, "Financial Reporting by Cable Television Companies." SAB 101 will not
have a material impact on our results of operations and consolidated financial
statements.

In March 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB
Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock
Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25" ("FIN 44"). FIN 44
clarifies the application of APB Opinion No. 25 and is effective July 1, 2000,
but certain conclusions in FIN 44 cover specific events as if they had occurred
after either December 15, 1998 or January 12, 2000. The application of FIN 44
does not have a material impact on our results of operations and consolidated
financial statements.

Inflation and Changing Prices

Our systems' costs and expenses are subject to inflation and price
fluctuations. Since changes in costs can be passed through to subscribers, such
changes are not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations.

Risk Factors

We have a history of net losses and may not be profitable in the future

We have had a history of net losses and expect to continue to report net
losses for the foreseeable future, which could adversely affect our ability to
finance our business in the future. We reported net losses of $39.8 million,
$81.3 million and $149.2 million for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999 and
2000, respectively. The principal reasons for our prior and anticipated net
losses include the depreciation and amortization expenses associated with our
acquisitions, the capital expenditures related to expanding and upgrading our
cable systems and interest costs on borrowed money. We expect that we will
continue to incur these expenses at increased levels as a result of our recent
and pending acquisitions and our network upgrade program, which expenses will
result in continued net losses.

If the AT&T transactions are consummated, the risks detailed herein may
intensify

MCC and AT&T Broadband, LLC have entered into agreements under which
various affiliates of AT&T Broadband will sell to MCC (subject to certain
conditions) cable systems serving approximately 840,000 basic subscribers in
Georgia, Illinois, Iowa and Missouri. The aggregate purchase price payable by
MCC for these systems is $2.215 billion in cash, subject to closing adjustments.
MCC expects to fund these acquisitions through a combination of new debt and
equity financings and borrowings under our existing subsidiary credit
facilities.

In the event that these transactions are consummated, our indebtedness may
increase substantially. In such case, each of the risks set forth in this Annual
Report, and particularly the risk detailed below under "We have substantial
existing debt and may incur substantial additional debt, which could adversely
affect our ability to obtain financing in the future and require our operating
subsidiaries to apply a substantial portion of their cash flow to debt service,"
may intensify.


42


We have grown rapidly and have a limited history of operating our current
cable systems, which may make it difficult for you to evaluate our performance

We commenced operations in 1996 and have grown rapidly since then,
principally through acquisitions. We acquired a substantial portion of our
operations in early 1998. In addition, our acquisitions in late 1999 doubled the
number of subscribers served by our cable systems. As a result, you have limited
information upon which to evaluate our performance in managing our current cable
systems, and our historical financial information may not be indicative of the
future results we can achieve with our cable systems.

If we are unable to successfully integrate our newly acquired cable systems,
our growth and profitability could be adversely affected

Since January 1, 1998, we have completed 14 acquisitions that comprise
approximately 91% of our current basic subscribers. In addition, we expect to
continue to acquire cable systems as an element of our business strategy. The
successful integration and management of acquired cable systems involve the
following principal risks that could adversely affect our growth and
profitability:

o our acquired cable systems may result in unexpected operating
difficulties, liabilities or contingencies, which could be
significant;

o the integration of acquired cable systems may place significant
demands on our management, diverting their attention from, and
making it more difficult for them to manage, our other cable
systems;

o the integration of acquired cable systems may require significant
financial resources that could otherwise be used for the ongoing
development of our other cable systems, including our network
upgrade program;

o we may be unable to recruit additional qualified personnel which may
be required to integrate and manage acquired cable systems; and

o our existing operational, financial and management systems may be
incompatible with or inadequate to effectively integrate and manage
acquired cable systems and any steps taken to implement changes in
our cable systems may not be sufficient.

The loss of key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our
business

Our success is substantially dependent upon the retention and continued
performance of the key personnel of MCC, including Rocco B. Commisso, its
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. MCC has not entered into an employment
agreement with Mr. Commisso. If Mr. Commisso or any other key personnel of MCC
ceases to be employed by MCC for any reason, our business could be materially
adversely affected. In addition, our subsidiary credit facilities provide that a
default will result if Mr. Commisso ceases to be Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer of MCC. MCC does not currently maintain key man life insurance on Mr.
Commisso.

We have substantial existing debt and may incur substantial additional debt,
which could adversely affect our ability to obtain financing in the future and
require our operating subsidiaries to apply a substantial portion of their
cash flow to debt service

Our total debt as of December 31, 2000 was approximately $987.0 million on
a historical basis and $1,025.0 million on a pro forma basis after giving effect
to our January 2001 offer and sale of $500.0 million of senior notes and the
application of the proceeds therefrom. Our interest expense for the year ended
December 31, 2000 was $69.0 million on a historical basis and $92.2 million on a
pro forma basis after giving effect to our January 2001 offer and sale of $500.0
million of senior notes and the application of the proceeds therefrom.


43


This high level of debt and our debt service obligations could have
material consequences, including:

o we may have difficulty borrowing money for working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions or other purposes;

o we may need to use a large portion of our revenues to pay interest
on borrowings under our subsidiary credit facilities and our senior
notes, which will reduce the amount of money available to finance
our operations, capital expenditures and other activities;

o some of our debt has a variable rate of interest, which may expose
us to the risk of increased interest rates;

o we may be more vulnerable to economic downturns and adverse
developments in our business;

o we may be less flexible in responding to changing business and
economic conditions, including increased competition and demand for
new products and services;

o we may be at a disadvantage when compared to those of our
competitors that have less debt; and

o we may not be able to implement our strategy.

We anticipate incurring additional debt to fund the expansion, maintenance
and upgrade of our cable systems and may incur additional debt to finance a
portion of MCC's purchase of the AT&T Broadband systems. If new debt is added to
our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

A default under our indentures or our subsidiary credit facilities could
result in an acceleration of our indebtedness or a foreclosure on the membership
interests of our operating subsidiaries

The indentures governing our senior notes and the agreements governing our
subsidiary credit facilities contain numerous financial and operating covenants.
The breach of any of these covenants will result in a default under the
applicable indenture or agreement which could result in the indebtedness under
our indentures or agreements becoming immediately due and payable. In addition,
a default under our indentures or our subsidiary credit facilities could result
in a default or acceleration of our other indebtedness with cross-default
provisions and could result in a foreclosure by the lenders under our subsidiary
credit facilities on the membership interests of our operating subsidiaries that
we pledged to secure these facilities.

The terms of our indebtedness could materially limit our financial and
operating flexibility

Several of the covenants contained in our indentures and our subsidiary
credit facilities could materially limit our financial and operating flexibility
by restricting, among other things, our ability and the ability of our operating
subsidiaries to:

o incur additional indebtedness;

o create liens and other encumbrances;

o pay dividends and make other payments, investments, loans and
guarantees;

o enter into transactions with related parties;

o sell or otherwise dispose of assets and merge or consolidate with
another entity;

o repurchase or redeem capital stock or debt;

o pledge assets; and

o issue capital stock.


44


We may not be able to obtain additional capital to continue the development
of our business

Our business requires substantial capital for the upgrade, expansion and
maintenance of our cable systems. We may not be able to obtain the funds
necessary to finance our capital improvement program through internally
generated funds, additional borrowings or other sources. If we are unable to
obtain these funds, our growth could be adversely affected.

If we are unsuccessful in implementing our growth strategy, our
profitability could be adversely affected

We expect that a substantial portion of our future growth will be achieved
through revenues from new products and services and the acquisition of
additional cable systems. We may not be able to offer these new products and
services successfully to our customers and these new products and services may
not generate adequate revenues. The amount of our capital expenditures and
related roll-out of advanced services may be limited by the availability of
certain equipment (in particular, digital set-top terminals and cable modems)
due to production capacity constraints of certain vendors or materials
shortages. In addition, our acquisition strategy may not be successful. In
recent years, the cable television industry has undergone dramatic
consolidation, which has reduced the number of future acquisition prospects.
This consolidation may increase the purchase price of future acquisitions, and
we may not be successful in identifying attractive acquisition targets or
obtaining the financing necessary to complete acquisitions in the future.

Our costs may increase significantly, which could adversely affect our
growth and profitability

The expansion and upgrade of our cable systems require us to hire and
enter into construction agreements with contractors. The growth and
consolidation of the cable television industry has created an increasing demand
for cable construction services, which has increased the costs of these
services. Our construction costs may increase significantly over the next few
years as existing agreements expire and we negotiate new agreements. In
addition, we may not be able to construct new cable systems or expand or upgrade
existing or acquired systems in a timely manner or at a reasonable cost, which
may adversely affect our growth and profitability. Our programming costs are
substantial and may increase, which could result in a decrease in profitability
if we are unable to pass increases on to our customers. In recent years, the
cable television industry has experienced a rapid escalation in the cost of
programming, particularly sports programming. The escalation in programming
costs may continue, and we may not be able to pass programming cost increases on
to our customers. In addition, as we upgrade the number of channels that we
provide to our customers and add programming to our basic and expanded basic
programming tiers, we may face additional market constraints on our ability to
pass programming costs on to our customers. Other costs in operating our cable
systems may also increase significantly. The inability to pass these cost
increases on to our customers could adversely affect our profitability.

The Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MCC has the ability to control
all major corporate decisions, which could inhibit or prevent a change of
control or change in management

Rocco B. Commisso, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MCC,
beneficially owns common stock of MCC representing approximately 86% of the
combined voting power. As a result, Mr. Commisso will generally have the ability
to control the outcome of all matters requiring stockholder approval, including
the election of its entire board of directors, the approval of any merger or
consolidation and the sale of all or substantially all of our assets. The
covenants contained in our subsidiary credit facilities provide that a default
will result if Mr. Commisso, together with one or more of our employees, ceases
to own at least 50.1% of the combined voting power of the common stock of MCC .

We may not be able to compete effectively in the highly competitive cable
industry

Our industry is highly competitive. The nature and level of the
competition we face affects, among other things, how much we must spend to
upgrade our cable systems, how much we must spend on marketing and promotions
and the prices we can charge our customers. We may not have the resources
necessary to compete effectively. Many of our present and potential competitors
may have fewer regulatory burdens, substantially greater resources, greater
brand name recognition and long-standing relationships with regulatory
authorities. We expect advancements in communications technology, as well as
changes in the marketplace, to occur in the future which may compete with
services that our cable systems offer. The success of these ongoing and future
developments could have an adverse impact on our business and operations.


45


Continued growth of direct broadcast satellite operators could adversely
affect our growth and profitability

Direct broadcast satellite operators have grown at a rate far exceeding
the cable television industry growth rate and have emerged as a significant
competitor to cable operators. Direct broadcast satellite service consists of
television programming transmitted via high-powered satellites to individual
homes, each served by a small satellite dish. The continued growth of direct
broadcast satellite operators may adversely affect our growth and profitability.
Legislation permitting direct broadcast satellite operators to transmit local
broadcast signals was enacted on November 29, 1999. This eliminated a
significant competitive advantage which cable system operators have had over
direct broadcast satellite operators. Direct broadcast satellite operators
deliver local broadcast signals in many markets which we serve. These companies
and others are also developing ways to bring advanced communications services to
their customers. They are currently offering satellite-delivered high-speed
Internet access services with a telephone return path and are beginning to
provide true two-way interactivity. We are unable to predict the effects these
competitive developments might have on our business and operations.

Recent changes in the regulatory environment may introduce additional
competitors in our markets

Recent changes in federal law and recent administrative and judicial
decisions have removed restrictions that have limited entry into the cable
television industry by potential competitors such as telephone companies and
registered utility holding companies. As a result, competition may materialize
in our franchise areas from other cable television operators, other video
programming distribution systems and other broadband telecommunications services
to the home. For example, these developments will enable local telephone and
utility companies to provide a wide variety of video services in their service
areas which will be directly competitive with the services provided by cable
systems in the same area.

Our franchises are non-exclusive and local franchising authorities may grant
competing franchises in our markets

Our cable systems are operated under non-exclusive franchises granted by
local franchising authorities. As a result, competing operators of cable systems
and other potential competitors, such as municipal utility providers, may be
granted franchises and may build cable systems in markets where we hold
franchises. Any such competition could adversely affect our business. The
existence of multiple cable systems in the same geographic area is generally
referred to as an overbuild. While we currently face overbuilds in a limited
number of our markets, we are unable to predict whether competitors will develop
in other franchise areas that we serve. Moreover, we are unable to predict the
impact these competitive ventures might have on our business and operations.

We may be required to provide access to our networks to other Internet
service providers, which could significantly increase our competition and
adversely affect our ability to provide new products and services

The U.S. Congress and the Federal Communications Commission have been
asked to require cable operators to provide access over their cable systems to
other Internet service providers. If we are required to provide open access, it
could prohibit us from entering into or limit our existing agreements with
Internet service providers, adversely impact our anticipated revenues from
high-speed Internet access services and complicate marketing and technical
issues associated with the introduction of these services. To date, the U.S.
Congress and the Federal Communications Commission have declined to impose these
requirements. This same open access issue is also being considered by some local
franchising authorities and several courts. Franchise renewals and transfers
could become more difficult depending upon the outcome of this issue.

Our franchises are subject to non-renewal or termination by local
authorities, which could cause us to lose our right to operate some of our
systems

Cable television companies operate under non-exclusive franchises granted
by local authorities that are subject to renewal, renegotiation and termination
from time to time. Our cable systems are dependent upon the retention and
renewal of their respective local franchises. We may not be able to retain or
renew our franchises and any renewals may not be on terms favorable to us. The
non-renewal or termination of franchises with respect to a significant portion
of any of our cable systems would have a material adverse effect on our
business.


46


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

In the normal course of business, we use interest rate swap agreements in
order to fix interest rates under debt contracts for the duration of the
contract as a hedge against interest rate volatility. As of December 31, 2000,
we had interest rate exchange agreements with various banks pursuant to which
the interest rate on $170.0 million is fixed at a weighted average swap rate of
approximately 6.7%, plus the average applicable margin over the Eurodollar Rate
option under our bank credit agreement. Under the terms of the interest rate
exchange agreements, which expire from 2002 through 2004, we are exposed to
credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other parties to the interest
rate exchange agreements. However, we do not anticipate nonperformance by the
counterparties. We would have paid approximately $1.6 million at December 31,
2000 if the interest rate exchange agreements were terminated, inclusive of
accrued interest. The table below provides information on our long-term debt.
See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements.



Expected Maturity
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(All dollar amounts in thousands)

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Thereafter Total Fair Value
------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ---------- --------- ----------

Fixed rate $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 187,000
Weighted average
interest rate 8.5% 8.5% 8.5% 8.5% 8.5% 8.5% 8.5%

Fixed rate $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 125,000 $ 125,000 $ 107,000
Weighted average
interest rate 7.9% 7.9% 7.9% 7.9% 7.9% 7.9% 7.9%

Variable rate $ - $ 750 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 655,250 $ 662,000 $ 662,000
Weighted average
interest rate 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3% 8.3%



47


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Contents
--------
Page
----
Report of Independent Public Accountants........................ 49
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999.... 50
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998............................ 51
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Members' Equity and
Comprehensive loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2000,
1999 and 1998................................................ 52
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended
December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998............................. 53
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements...................... 54
Schedule II-Valuation of Qualifying Accounts.................... 66


MEDIACOM CAPITAL CORPORATION

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Contents
Page
----
Report of Independent Public Accountants........................ 67
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2000 and 1999................. 68
Notes to Balance Sheets......................................... 69


48


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To Mediacom LLC:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mediacom LLC (a
New York limited liability company) and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and
1999, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in members'
equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period then ended December 31, 2000. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit
also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of Mediacom LLC and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period then
ended December 31, 2000 in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.

Our audits were made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole. Schedule II--Valuation and
Qualifying Accounts is presented for purposes of complying with the Securities
and Exchange Commissions rules and is not part of the basic consolidated
financial statements. This schedule has been subjected to the auditing
procedures applied in the audit of the basic consolidated financial statements
and, in our opinion, fairly states in all material respects the financial data
required to be set forth therein in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
February 16, 2001


49


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(All dollar amounts in 000's)



December 31,
------------
2000 1999
---------- ----------

ASSETS


Cash and cash equivalents................................ $ 4,093 $ 4,473
Subscriber accounts receivable, net of allowance
for doubtful accounts of $932 and $772, respectively.. 13,500 12,149
Prepaid expenses and other assets........................ 7,023 4,376
Investments.............................................. 3,985 8,794
Investment in cable television systems:
Inventory............................................. 14,131 12,384
Property, plant and equipment, at cost................ 840,052 700,696
Less: accumulated depreciation........................ (204,440) (101,693)
---------- ----------
Property, plant and equipment, net.................. 635,612 599,003
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
of $124,955 and $56,171, respectively............... 680,420 588,103
---------- ----------
Total investment in cable television systems........ 1,330,163 1,199,490
Other assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$5,749 and $6,343, respectively....................... 17,008 43,599
---------- ----------
Total assets........................................ $1,375,772 $1,272,881
========== ==========

LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY

LIABILITIES
Debt.................................................. $ 987,000 $1,139,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses................. 80,143 56,310
Subscriber advances................................... 3,886 3,188
Management fees payable............................... 1,236 873
Deferred revenue...................................... 40,510 18,895
---------- ----------
Total liabilities................................... $1,112,775 $1,218,266
---------- ----------

MEMBERS' EQUITY
Capital contributions................................. 521,696 142,096
Other equity.......................................... 18,598 39,917
Accumulated comprehensive (loss) income............... (414) 261
Accumulated deficit................................... (276,883) (127,659)
---------- ----------
Total members' equity............................... 262,997 54,615
---------- ----------
Total liabilities and members' equity............... $1,375,772 $1,272,881
========== ==========


The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.


50


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(All amounts in 000's)



Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
--------- -------- --------

Revenues............................................... $ 332,050 $176,052 $129,297

Costs and expenses:
Service costs..................................... 114,234 58,058 43,849
Selling, general and administrative expenses...... 55,820 32,949 25,596
Management fee expense............................ 6,029 6,951 5,797
Depreciation and amortization..................... 177,928 101,065 65,793
Non-cash stock charges............................ 28,254 15,445 -
--------- -------- --------
Operating loss......................................... (50,215) (38,416) (11,738)
--------- -------- --------
Interest expense, net.................................. 68,973 37,817 23,994
Other expenses......................................... 30,036 5,087 4,058
--------- -------- --------
Net loss............................................... $(149,224) $(81,320) $(39,790)
========== ======== ========


The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.


51


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN
MEMBERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(All dollar amounts in 000's)



Accumulated
Capital Other Comprehensive Accumulated
Contributions Equity (Loss) Income Deficit Total
---------- --------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Balance, December 31, 1997 $ 30,990 $ - $ - $ (6,549) $ 24,441
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss - - - (39,790)
Comprehensive loss (39,790)
Members' contributions 94,000 - - - 94,000
---------- --------- -------- ---------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1998 $ 124,990 $ - $ - $ (46,339) $ 78,651
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss - - - (81,320)
Unrealized gain on investments - - 261 -
Comprehensive loss (81,059)
Members' contributions 10,500 - - - 10,500
Non-cash contributions 6,606 - - - 6,606
Non-cash contribution for the
reduction of management fees - 25,100 - - 25,100
Equity issued to management - 27,016 - - 27,016
Non-vested portion of equity
granted to management - (12,199) - - (12,199)
---------- --------- -------- ---------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 1999 $ 142,096 $ 39,917 $ 261 $ (127,659) $ 54,615
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss - - - (149,224)
Unrealized loss on investments - - (675) -
Comprehensive loss (149,899)
Equity contribution from MCC 354,500 - - - 354,500
Reclassification of vested equity to
capital contributions 25,100 (25,100) - - -
Vesting of equity granted to
management, net of forfeiture - 3,781 - - 3,781
---------- --------- -------- ---------- ----------
Balance, December 31, 2000 $ 521,696 $ 18,598 $ (414) $ (276,883) $ 262,997
========== ========= ======== ========== ==========


The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.


52


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(All dollar amounts in 000's)



Years Ended December 31,
----------------------------------------------
2000 1999 1998
----------- ----------- -------------

CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss............................................................ $ (149,224) $ (81,320) $ (39,790)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash flows from operating
activities:
Accretion of interest on seller note.............................. - 225 287
Depreciation and amortization..................................... 177,928 101,065 65,793
Impairment of available-for-sale securities....................... 28,488 - -
Vesting of management stock....................................... 3,781 14,817 -
Other non-cash charges............................................ 24,473 7,234 -
Amortization of SoftNet revenue................................... (2,502) (142) -
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
Subscriber accounts receivable.................................. (980) 429 (1,437)
Prepaid expenses and other assets............................... (2,276) (2,211) 329
Accounts payable and accrued expenses........................... 13,172 13,120 26,665
Subscriber advances............................................. 320 480 852
Management fees payable......................................... 363 (89) 857
Deferred revenue................................................ (325) 608 -
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash flows provided by operating activities............... 93,218 54,216 53,556
----------- ----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital expenditures................................................ (182,552) (86,669) (53,721)
Acquisitions of cable television systems............................ (112,142) (764,253) (343,330)
Other, net.......................................................... (919) (626) (34)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash flows used in investing activities................... (295,613) (851,548) (397,085)
----------- ----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
New borrowings...................................................... 318,000 995,700 488,200
Repayment of debt................................................... (470,000) (194,830) (223,350)
Capital contributions............................................... 354,500 10,500 94,000
Financing costs..................................................... (485) (11,777) (14,136)
----------- ----------- -----------
Net cash flows provided by financing activities............... 202,015 799,593 344,714
----------- ----------- -----------
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents.......... (380) 2,261 1,185

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year........................... 4,473 2,212 1,027
----------- ----------- -----------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year................................. $ 4,093 $ 4,473 $ 2,212
=========== =========== ===========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for interest.............................. $ 74,811 $ 28,639 $ 21,127
=========== =========== ===========
Cash paid during the year for taxes................................. $ 50 $ - $ -
=========== =========== ===========


The accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
are an integral part of these statements.


53


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1) Limited Liability Company

Organization

Mediacom LLC ("Mediacom," and collectively with its subsidiaries, the
"Company"), a New York limited liability company wholly-owned by Mediacom
Communications Corporation ("MCC"), is involved in the acquisition and
development of cable television systems serving principally non-metropolitan
markets of the United States. Through these cable systems, the Company provides
entertainment, information and telecommunications services to its subscribers.
As of December 31, 2000, the Company had acquired and was operating cable
television systems in 22 states, principally Alabama, California, Florida,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Minnesota, Missouri and North Carolina.

On February 9, 2000, MCC, a Delaware corporation organized in November
1999, completed an initial public offering of its Class A common stock.
Immediately prior to the completion of its initial public offering, MCC issued
shares of its Class A and Class B common stock in exchange for all of the
outstanding membership interests in Mediacom and became the sole member and
manager of Mediacom.

Prior to February 9, 2000, Mediacom conducted its affairs pursuant to an
amended and restated operating agreement among its members. Pursuant to this
amended and restated operating agreement, net losses were generally allocated
first to the Commisso Members (the "Primary Members"), as defined therein,
including the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MCC (the "Manager"), and
the balance of the net losses to the other members ratably in accordance with
their respective membership units.

Mediacom serves as a holding company for the Company's operating
subsidiaries. Each operating subsidiary is wholly-owned by Mediacom, except for
a 1.0% ownership interest in a subsidiary, Mediacom California LLC, that is held
by Mediacom Management Corporation ("Mediacom Management"), a Delaware
corporation.

Mediacom Capital Corporation ("Mediacom Capital"), a New York corporation
wholly-owned by Mediacom, was organized in March 1998 for the sole purpose of
acting as co-issuer with Mediacom of public debt securities. Mediacom Capital
has nominal assets and does not conduct operations of its own.

Capitalization

For the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, Mediacom received equity
contributions from its members of $10.5 million and $94.0 million respectively.
On February 9, 2000, Mediacom received an equity contribution from MCC of $354.5
million.

(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Mediacom and
its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have
been eliminated. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.


54


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Revenue Recognition

Revenues include amounts billed to customers for services provided,
installations, advertising and others. Revenues from basic, premium,
pay-per-view and data services are recognized when the services are provided to
the customers. Installation revenues are recognized to the extent of direct
selling costs incurred. Additional installation revenues collected, if any, are
deferred and amortized to income over the estimated average life of a
subscriber. Advertising sales are recognized in the period that the
advertisements are exhibited. Franchise fees are collected on a monthly basis
and are periodically remitted to local franchise authorities. Franchise fees
collected and paid are reported as revenues and expenses.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company's accounts receivable is comprised of amounts due from
subscribers in varying regions throughout the United States. Concentration of
credit risk with respect to these receivables is limited due to the large number
of customers comprising the Company's customer base and their geographic
dispersion.

Investments

Investments consist of equity securities. Management classifies these
securities as available-for-sale securities under the provisions defined in the
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, "Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities." Available-for-sale securities are
carried at market value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as a
component of accumulated comprehensive income. If a decline in the fair value of
the security is judged to be other than temporary, a realized loss will be
recorded.

Inventory

Inventory consists primarily of fiber-optic cable, coaxial cable,
electronics, hardware and miscellaneous tools and are stated at the lower of
cost or market. Cost is determined using the average cost method.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment is recorded at purchased and capitalized
cost. The Company capitalizes a portion of direct and indirect costs related to
the construction, replacement and installation of property, plant and equipment.
The Company capitalized interest of approximately $5.3 million and $1.8 million
for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Capitalized costs
are charged to property, plant and equipment and depreciated over the life of
the related assets.

Amounts incurred for repairs and maintenance are charged to operations in
the period incurred.

Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the following
useful lives:

Buildings...................................... 45 years
Leasehold improvements......................... Life of respective lease
Cable systems and equipment.................... 5 to 10 years
Subscriber devices............................. 5 years
Vehicles....................................... 5 years
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment....... 5 to 10 years


55


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets include franchising costs, goodwill, subscriber lists
and covenants not to compete. Amortization of intangible assets is calculated on
a straight-line basis over the following lives:

Franchising costs..................................... 15 years
Goodwill 15 years
Subscriber lists...................................... 5 years
Covenants not to compete.............................. 3 to 7 years

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 121 ("SFAS 121"), "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of." SFAS 121 requires that
long-lived assets and certain identifiable intangibles to be held and used by
any entity be reviewed for impairment at each year end and whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be
recoverable. There has been no impairment of long-lived assets of the Company
under SFAS 121.

Other Assets

Other assets include financing costs of approximately $17.0 million and
$19.1 million and a deferred stock expense of approximately $0 and $24.5 as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Financing costs incurred to raise debt
are deferred and amortized over the expected term of such financings. The
deferred stock expense was recognized during 2000 as a non-cash stock charge in
the consolidated statements of operations. (See Note 7).

Comprehensive Loss

During 1999, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income," which establishes standards
for reporting and displaying comprehensive income and its components in the
consolidated financial statements. In accordance with SFAS 130, the Company
records temporary unrealized gains and losses on investments as a component of
accumulated comprehensive income.

Segment Reporting

In accordance with SFAS No. 131, "Disclosure about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information," segments have been identified based upon
management responsibility. Management has identified one reportable segment,
cable services.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year's amounts to
conform to the current year's presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 1998, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 ("SFAS
133"), "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," was
issued effective January 1, 2001. This statement establishes the accounting and
reporting standards for derivatives and hedging activity. Upon adoption of SFAS
133, all derivatives are required to be recognized in the statement of financial
position as either assets or liabilities and measured at fair value. The Company
estimates the impact of the adoption of SFAS 133, as amended, will result in an
after tax charge of approximately $1.6 million which will be reflected as a
change in accounting principle in 2001.


56


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

In March 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") issued Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 101 ("SAB 101"). SAB 101 summarizes certain areas of the
SEC's views in applying generally accepted accounting principles to revenue
recognition in financial statements. SAB 101 does not apply to the Company's
basic cable television business. The Company will continue to account for
revenues based upon Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 51,
"Financial Reporting by Cable Television Companies." SAB 101 will not have a
material impact on the Company's results of operations and consolidated
financial statements.

In March 2000, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB
Interpretation No. 44, "Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock
Compensation, an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25" ("FIN 44"). FIN 44
clarifies the application of APB Opinion No. 25 and is effective July 1, 2000,
but certain conclusions in FIN 44 cover specific events as if they had occurred
after either December 15, 1998 or January 12, 2000. The application of FIN 44
does not have a material impact on the Company's results of operations and
consolidated financial statements.

(3) Acquisitions

The Company has completed the undernoted acquisitions (the "Acquired
Systems") in 2000 and 1999. These acquisitions were accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting, and accordingly, the purchase price of these
Acquired Systems has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at their estimated fair values at their respective date of acquisition.
The results of operations of the Acquired Systems have been included with those
of the Company since the dates of acquisition.

2000

During 2000, the Company completed nine acquisitions of cable systems
serving 53,000 basic subscribers for an aggregate purchase price of $109.2
million, including a $2.5 million deferred conditional payment to a seller. The
cable systems serve communities in Alabama, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Minnesota
and South Dakota. The aggregate purchase price has been allocated as follows:
approximately $48.2 million to property, plant and equipment, and approximately
$58.5 million to intangible assets. Additionally, approximately $2.7 million of
direct acquisition costs have been allocated to property, plant and equipment
and intangible assets. These acquisitions were financed with borrowings under
the Company's credit facilities. (See Note 6).

1999

On October 15, 1999, the Company acquired the stock of Zylstra
Communications Corporation (the "Zylstra Systems"), for a purchase price of
approximately $19.5 million. Zylstra owned and operated cable systems serving
approximately 14,000 subscribers in Iowa, Minnesota and South Dakota. The
purchase price has been allocated as follows: $7.8 million to property, plant
and equipment, and $11.7 million to intangible assets. Additionally,
approximately $400,000 of direct acquisition costs has been allocated to
property, plant and equipment and intangible assets. The Zylstra acquisition was
financed with borrowings under the Company's credit facilities. (See Note 6).

On November 5, 1999, the Company acquired the assets of cable systems
owned by Triax Midwest Associates, L.P. (the "Triax Systems"), for a purchase
price of approximately $740.1 million. The Triax Systems served approximately
344,000 subscribers primarily in Illinois, Indiana, and Minnesota. The purchase
price has been allocated based on an independent appraisal as follows: $198.3
million to property, plant and equipment, and $541.8 million to intangible
assets. Additionally, approximately $13.5 million of direct acquisition costs
has been allocated to property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and other
assets. The Triax acquisition was financed with $10.5 million of additional
equity contributions from Mediacom LLC's members and borrowings under the
Company's credit facilities. (See Notes 1 and 6).


57


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Summarized below are the pro forma unaudited results of operations for the
years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, assuming the purchase of the Acquired
Systems had been consummated as of January 1, 1999. Adjustments have been made
to: (i) depreciation and amortization reflecting the fair value of the assets
acquired; and (ii) interest expense reflecting the debt incurred to finance the
acquisitions. The pro forma results may not be indicative of the results that
would have occurred if the acquisitions had been completed on the date indicated
or which may be obtained in the future.

2000 1999
----------- -----------
(dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)

Revenues............................ $ 348,391 $ 318,086
Operating loss...................... (50,520) (39,013)
Net loss............................ (150,483) (139,005)


(4) Property, Plant and Equipment

As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, property, plant and equipment consisted
of:

2000 1999
--------- ---------
(dollars in thousands)

Land and land improvements....................... $ 578 $ 414
Buildings and leasehold improvements............. 11,973 6,171
Cable systems, equipment and subscriber devices.. 801,719 682,305
Vehicles......................................... 17,865 7,211
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment......... 7,917 4,595
--------- ---------
$ 840,052 $ 700,696
Accumulated depreciation......................... (204,440) (101,693)
--------- ---------
$ 635,612 $ 599,003
========= =========

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
was approximately $106.8 million, $59.2 million and $39.7 million, respectively.

(5) Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes the net asset value for each intangible
asset category as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 (dollars in thousands):


58


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Gross Asset Accumulated Net Asset
2000 Value Amortization Value
---- ---------- ------------ ---------
Franchising costs............ $ 651,952 $ 59,151 $ 592,801
Goodwill 13,699 1,764 11,935
Subscriber lists............. 134,024 60,668 73,356
Covenants not to compete..... 5,700 3,372 2,328
---------- ------------ ---------
$ 805,375 $ 124,955 $ 680,420
========== ============ =========

Gross Asset Accumulated Net Asset
1999 Value Amortization Value
---- ---------- ------------ ---------
Franchising costs............ $ 539,221 $ 18,174 $ 521,047
Goodwill..................... 8,447 1,163 7,284
Subscriber list.............. 91,746 34,552 57,194
Covenants not to compete..... 4,860 2,282 2,578
---------- ------------ ---------
$ 644,274 $ 56,171 $ 588,103
========== ============ =========

Amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998
was approximately $71.1 million, $41.9 million and $26.1 million, respectively.

(6) Debt

As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, debt consisted of:

2000 1999
-------- -----------
(dollars in thousands)
8 1/2% Senior Notes(a)................ $200,000 $ 200,000
7 7/8% Senior Notes(b)................ 125,000 125,000
Bank Credit Agreements(c)............. 662,000 814,000
-------- -----------
$987,000 $ 1,139,000
======== ===========

(a) On April 1, 1998, Mediacom and Mediacom Capital, jointly issued
$200.0 million aggregate principal amount of 8 1/2% senior notes due
on April 15, 2008 (the "8 1/2% Senior Notes"). The 8 1/2% Senior
Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company, and the indenture
for the 8 1/2% Senior Notes stipulates, among other things,
restrictions on incurrence of indebtedness, distributions, mergers
and asset sales and has cross-default provisions related to other
debt of the Company. The Company was in compliance with the
indenture governing the 8 1/2% Senior Notes as of December 31, 2000.

(b) On February 26, 1999, Mediacom and Mediacom Capital jointly issued
$125.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7 7/8% senior notes due
on February 15, 2011 (the "7 7/8% Senior Notes"). The 7 7/8% Senior
Notes are unsecured obligations of the Company, and the indenture
for the 7 7/8% Senior Notes stipulates, among other things,
restrictions on incurrence of indebtedness, distributions, mergers
and asset sales and has cross-default provisions related to other
debt of the Company. The Company was in compliance with the
indenture governing the 7 7/8% Senior Notes as of December 31, 2000.


59


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(c) On September 30, 1999, the Company entered into credit facilities in
the aggregate amount of $550.0 million, consisting of a $450.0
million reducing revolving credit facility and a $100.0 million term
loan (the "Mediacom USA Credit Agreement"). The revolving credit
facility expires on March 31, 2008, subject to earlier expiration on
June 30, 2007 if Mediacom does not refinance the 8 1/2% Senior Notes
by March 31, 2007. The term loan is due and payable on September 30,
2008, and is subject to repayment on September 30, 2007 if Mediacom
does not refinance the 8 1/2% Senior Notes by March 31, 2007. The
reducing revolving credit facility makes available a maximum
commitment amount for a period of up to eight and one-half years,
which is subject to quarterly reductions, beginning September 30,
2002, ranging from 1.25% to 17.50% of the original commitment amount
of the reducing revolver. The Mediacom USA Credit Agreement requires
mandatory reductions of the reducing revolver facility from excess
cash flow, as defined therein, beginning December 31, 2002. The
Mediacom USA Credit Agreement provides for interest at varying rates
based upon various borrowing options and the attainment of certain
financial ratios, and for commitment fees of 1/4% to (3)/8% per
annum on the unused portion of available credit under the reducing
revolver credit facility.

On November 5, 1999, the Company entered into other credit
facilities in the aggregate amount of $550.0 million, consisting of
a $450.0 million reducing revolving credit facility and a $100.0
million term loan (the "Mediacom Midwest Credit Agreement", together
with the Mediacom USA Credit Agreement, the "Bank Credit
Agreements"). The revolving credit facility expires on June 30,
2008, subject to earlier expiration on September 30, 2007 if
Mediacom does not refinance the 8 1/2% Senior Notes by March 31,
2007. The term loan is due and payable on December 31, 2008, and is
subject to repayment on December 31, 2007 if Mediacom does not
refinance the 8 1/2% Senior Notes by March 31, 2007. The reducing
revolving credit facility makes available a maximum commitment
amount for a period of up to eight and one-half years, which is
subject to quarterly reductions, beginning September 30, 2002,
ranging from 1.25% to 8.75% of the original commitment amount of the
reducing revolver. The Mediacom Midwest Credit Agreement requires
mandatory reductions of the reducing revolver facility from excess
cash flow, as defined therein, beginning December 31, 2002. The
Midwest Credit Agreement provides for interest at varying rates
based upon various borrowing options and the attainment of certain
financial ratios, and for commitment fees of 1/4% to (3)/8% per
annum on the unused portion of available credit under the reducing
revolver credit facility.

The Bank Credit Agreements require the Company to maintain
compliance with certain financial covenants including, but not
limited to, leverage, interest coverage and pro forma debt service
coverage ratios, as defined therein. The Bank Credit Agreements also
require the Company to maintain compliance with other covenants
including, but not limited to, limitations on mergers and
acquisitions, consolidations and sales of certain assets, liens, the
incurrence of additional indebtedness, certain restrictive payments,
and certain transactions with affiliates. The Company was in
compliance with all covenants of the Bank Credit Agreements as of
December 31, 2000.

The Bank Credit Agreements are secured by Mediacom's pledge of all
its ownership interests in its operating subsidiaries and is
guaranteed by Mediacom on a limited recourse basis to the extent of
such ownership interests. At December 31, 2000, the Company had
$436.6 million of unused bank commitments under the Bank Credit
Agreements.

The average interest rate on debt outstanding under the Bank Credit
Agreements was 8.3% and 8.0% for the three months December 31, 2000
and December 31, 1999, respectively, before giving effect to the
interest rate swap agreements discussed below.

The Company uses interest rate swap agreements in order to fix the
interest rate for the duration of the contract to hedge against interest rate
volatility. As of December 31, 2000, the Company had interest rate exchange
agreements with various banks pursuant to which the interest rate on $170.0
million is fixed at a weighted average swap rate of


60


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

approximately 6.7%, plus the average applicable margin over the Eurodollar Rate
option under our bank credit agreement. Under the terms of the interest rate
exchange agreements, which expire from 2002 through 2004, the Company is exposed
to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other parties to the
interest rate exchange agreements. However, the Company does not anticipate
nonperformance by the counterparties.

The fair value of the swaps is the estimated amount that the Company would
receive or pay to terminate the swaps, taking into account current interest
rates and the current creditworthiness of the swap counterparties. At December
31, 2000, the Company would have paid approximately $1.6 million if the swaps
were terminated, inclusive of accrued interest.

The fair value of the Company's debt is estimated based on the current
rates offered to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. The fair
value of the senior bank debt approximates the carrying value. The fair value at
December 31, 2000 of the 8 1/2% Senior Notes and the 7 7/8% Senior Notes was
approximately $187.0 million and $107.0 million, respectively.

The stated maturities of all debt outstanding as of December 31, 2000 are
as follows (dollars in thousands):

2001................................... $ -
2002................................... 750
2003................................... 2,000
2004................................... 2,000
2005................................... 2,000
Thereafter ............................ 980,250
-----------
$ 987,000
===========

(7) Related Party Transactions

Prior to MCC's initial public offering in February 2000, separate
management agreements with each of Mediacom's operating subsidiaries provided
for Mediacom Management to be paid compensation for management services
performed for the Company. Until November 19, 1999, under such agreements,
Mediacom Management was entitled to receive annual management fees calculated as
follows: (i) 5.0% of the first $50.0 million of annual gross operating revenues
of the Company; (ii) 4.5% of such revenues in excess thereof up to $75.0
million; and (iii) 4.0% of such revenues in excess of $75.0 million. Effective
November 19, 1999, the management agreements with Mediacom Management were
amended in connection with an amendment to Mediacom's operating agreement to
provide annual management fees equal to 2.0% of annual gross revenues. In
connection with this amendment to Mediacom's operating agreement, Mediacom
Management also agreed to waive all management fees incurred from July 1, 1999
through November 19, 1999 by Mediacom's operating subsidiaries in the amount of
approximately $2.8 million. The amount waived is included in capital
contributions in the consolidated balance sheets. Upon MCC's initial public
offering in February 2000, all management agreements with Mediacom Management
were terminated and replaced with management agreements between MCC and the
Company's operating subsidiaries. (See Note 12). The Company incurred management
fees under the agreements with Mediacom Management of approximately $559,000,
$7.0 million (including the $2.8 million waived) and $5.8 million for the years
ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.


61


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Also in connection with this amendment to the operating agreement, the
Company recorded a deferred stock expense in 1999 of approximately $25.1 million
for which additional membership units of Mediacom were issued to the Manager.
This deferred expense represented the future benefit of reduced management fees.
During 1999, the Company recorded a non-cash stock charge of approximately
$628,000 in its consolidated statements of operations for the amortization of
the future benefit. The remaining balance of approximately $24.5 million was
recognized as a non-cash expense during the year ended December 31, 2000 as a
result of MCC's initial public offering and the termination of all management
agreements with Mediacom Management. (See Note 12).

Mediacom Management also agreed to waive its right to all future
acquisition fees, including the $3.8 million fee related to the acquisitions of
the Triax and Zylstra systems during 1999, as part of this amendment to the
operating agreement described above. For the years ended December 31, 1999 and
1998, the Company incurred acquisition fees of approximately $3.8 million and
$3.3 million, respectively. Acquisition fees are included in other expenses in
the consolidated statements of operations. Mediacom Management is a wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MCC.

Certain of the Company's shareholders are financial institutions who
perform various investment banking and commercial banking services. For the
years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, the Company paid approximately
$450,000, $8.9 million and $10.2 million for services performed, respectively.

(8) Employee Benefit Plans

Substantially all employees of the Company are eligible to participate in
a deferred arrangement pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k) (the
"Plan"). Under such arrangement, eligible employees may contribute up to 15% of
their current pre-tax compensation to the Plan. The Plan permits, but does not
require, matching contributions and non-matching (profit sharing) contributions
to be made by the Company up to a maximum dollar amount or maximum percentage of
participant contributions, as determined annually by the Company. The Company
presently matches 50% on the first 6% of employee contributions. The Company's
contributions under the Plan totaled approximately $590,000, $302,000 and
$264,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, respectively.

(9) Commitments and Contingencies

Under various lease and rental agreements for offices, warehouses and
computer terminals, the Company had rental expense of approximately $2.5
million, $1.3 million and $588,000 for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999
and 1998, respectively. Future minimum annual rental payments are as follows
(dollars in thousands):

2001........................................... $ 1,949
2002........................................... 1,520
2003........................................... 1,120
2004........................................... 902
2005........................................... 752

In addition, the Company rents utility poles in its operations generally
under short-term arrangements, but the Company expects these arrangements to
recur. Total rental expense for utility poles was approximately $3.0 million,
$1.8 million and $1.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and
1998, respectively.

As of December 31, 2000, approximately $1.4 million of letters of credit
were issued in favor of various parties to secure the Company's performance
relating to insurance and franchise requirements and pole rentals.


62


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Legal Proceedings

On November 3, 2000, the Company resolved litigation brought against it by
Grey Advertising, Inc. ("Grey") in January 2000. MCC and Grey entered into a
final settlement agreement that involves no monetary payments by either party
and that permits MCC and its subsidiaries to continue to use the name "Mediacom"
in accordance with the terms of their confidential agreement.

There are no other material pending legal proceedings to which the Company
is a party or to which any of our properties are subject.

Regulation in the Cable Television Industry

The cable television industry is subject to extensive regulation by
federal, local and, in some instances, state government agencies. The Cable
Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and the Cable
Communication Policy Act of 1984 (collectively, the "Cable Acts"), both of which
amended the Communications Act of 1934 (as amended, the "Communications Act"),
established a national policy to guide the development and regulation of cable
television systems. The Communications Act was amended by the Telecommunications
Act of 1996 (the "1996 Telecom Act"). Principal responsibility for implementing
the policies of the Cable Acts and the 1996 Telecom Act has been allocated
between the FCC and state or local regulatory authorities.

Federal Law and Regulation

The Cable Acts and the FCC's rules implementing such acts generally have
increased the administrative and operational expenses of cable television
systems and have resulted in additional regulatory oversight by the FCC and
local or state franchise authorities. The Cable Acts and the corresponding FCC
regulations have established, among other things: (i) rate regulations; (ii)
mandatory carriage and retransmission consent requirements that require a cable
television system under certain circumstances to carry a local broadcast station
or to obtain consent to carry a local or distant broadcast station; (iii) rules
for franchise renewals and transfers; and (iv) other requirements covering a
variety of operational areas such as equal employment opportunity, technical
standards and customer service requirements.

The FCC and Congress continue to be concerned that rates for regulated
programming services are rising at a rate exceeding inflation. It is therefore
possible that the FCC will further restrict the ability of cable television
operators to implement rate increases or Congress will enact legislation to
effect the same outcome.

State and Local Regulation

Cable television systems generally operate pursuant to non-exclusive
franchises, permits or licenses granted by a municipality or other state or
local governmental entity. The terms and conditions of franchises vary
materially from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. A number of states subject cable
television systems to the jurisdiction of centralized state government agencies.
To date, other than Delaware, no state in which the Company currently operates
has enacted state level regulation. The Company cannot predict whether any of
the states in which currently operates will engage in such regulation in the
future.

(10) SoftNet

In November 1999, the Company completed an agreement with SoftNet Systems,
Inc. ("SoftNet") to deploy SoftNet's high-speed Internet access services
throughout the Company's cable television systems. In addition to a revenue
sharing arrangement with SoftNet, the Company received 3.5 million shares of
SoftNet's common stock of which approximately 2.2 million shares were vested and
non-forfeitable as of December 31, 2000. Upon vesting into shares of SoftNet
common stock pursuant to the SoftNet agreement, the Company recorded deferred
revenue. As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, this deferred revenue amounted to
approximately $30.2 million and $8.4 million,


63


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

respectively, net of amortization recorded. The Company is recognizing this
deferred revenue over the life of the SoftNet agreement. For the years ended
December 31, 2000 and 1999, the Company recognized such revenue of approximately
$2.5 million and $142,000, respectively.

For the year ended December 31, 2000, relating to the decline in value of
the Company's investment in SoftNet common stock that was deemed other than
temporary, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of approximately $28.5 million
as a realized loss in other expenses in its consolidated statements of
operations.

(11) Employment Arrangements

During 1999, the Company recorded a deferred non-cash stock expense of
approximately $27.0 million relating to the grant of membership units of
Mediacom to certain members of management for past and future services. These
units will vest over five years and are subject to forfeiture penalties during
the three year period between the date the membership units become vested and
the date the employee leaves the Company. Forfeited units will revert to the
Manager. At MCC's initial public offering, all outstanding membership units were
redeemed and converted to common shares of MCC. Future vesting under these
employment arrangements will be in common shares of MCC (See Note 12). For the
years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999, Mediacom recorded a non-cash stock
charge of approximately $3.8 million and $14.8 million, respectively, in its
consolidated statements of operations, relating to the vested and
non-forfeitable membership units. As of December 31, 2000 and 1999, the balance
of approximately $8.4 and $12.2 million, respectively, relating to the
non-vested and forfeitable membership units, was recorded as additional paid in
capital in the consolidated balance sheets and is being amortized as a non-cash
stock expense over a period of five to eight years.

(12) Events Relating to MCC's Initial Public Offering

Prior to MCC's initial public offering on February 9, 2000, additional
membership interests were issued to all members of Mediacom in accordance with a
formula set forth in the amended and restated operating agreement, which was
based upon a valuation of Mediacom established at the time of the initial public
offering. A provision in the operating agreement eliminated a certain portion of
the special allocation of membership interests awarded to Primary Members based
upon a valuation of Mediacom. In connection with the removal of these specified
special allocation provisions and the amendments to Mediacom's management
agreements with Mediacom Management effective November 19, 1999 (See Note 7),
the Primary Members were issued new membership interests in Mediacom immediately
prior to the initial public offering representing 16.5% of the equity in
Mediacom. These newly issued membership interests were exchanged for shares of
MCC Class B common stock immediately prior to the completion of the initial
public offering.

The management agreements between Mediacom Management and each of MCC's
operating subsidiaries were terminated at the time of MCC's initial public
offering and were replaced with new agreements between MCC and the Company's
operating subsidiaries. Under such agreements, MCC is entitled to receive annual
management fees in amounts not to exceed 4.5% of the Company's gross operating
revenues. For the year ended December 31, 2000, the Company incurred management
fees under these agreements of approximately $5.5 million.

As a result of the initial public offering and the termination of the
management agreements with Mediacom Management, a deferred non-cash stock
expense of $24.5 million was recorded, relating to future benefits associated
with the continuation of such management agreements. This charge was recorded
for the year ended December 31, 2000 as a non-cash stock charge in the
consolidated statements of operations. Mediacom Management is wholly-owned by
the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of MCC.


64


MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(13) Subsequent Events

As of January 31, 2001, the Company and SoftNet mutually agreed to
terminate their affiliate relationship. The Company is in the process of
transitioning its cable modem customers to the Excite@Home service. In the first
quarter of 2001, the Company will recognize the deferred revenue that resulted
from the Company's receipt of SoftNet shares in 1999 and the subsequent vesting
thereof. Such deferred revenue will be recorded as other income in the Company's
consolidated statements of operations.

On January 24, 2001, Mediacom and Mediacom Capital, completed an offering
of $500.0 million of 9 1/2% senior notes due January 2013. Interest on the 9
1/2% senior notes will be payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of
each year, commencing on July 15, 2001. Approximately $467.5 million of the net
proceeds were used to repay a substantial portion of outstanding indebtedness
under the Company's subsidiary credit facilities and related accrued interest.
The balance of the net proceeds is being used for general corporate purposes.

On February 7, 2001, Mediacom and Mediacom Capital filed a registration
statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission under which it may sell
debt securities for a maximum amount of $1.0 billion. The Securities and
Exchange Commission declared this registration statement effective on February
13, 2001.

On February 26, 2001, MCC entered into agreements with AT&T Broadband, LLC
to acquire cable systems serving approximately 840,000 basic subscribers in
Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri, for an aggregate purchase price of $2.215
billion in cash, subject to closing adjustments. MCC expects to fund these
acquisitions through a combination of new debt and equity financings and
borrowings under the Company's existing subsidiary credit facilities. These
pending transactions are expected to close in the second or third quarter of
2001, subject to customary closing conditions and the receipt of regulatory and
other approvals.


65


Schedule II
MEDIACOM LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
(All dollar amounts in 000's)



Balance at Additions
beginning of charged to costs Balance at
period and expenses Deductions end of period
------------ ---------------- ---------- -------------

December 31, 1998
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Current receivables.......... $ 56 $ 1,694 $ 1,452 $ 298
Acquisition reserves(1)
Accrued expenses............. $ - $ 4,120 $ - $ 4,120

December 31, 1999
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Current receivables.......... $ 298 $ 975 $ 501 $ 772
Acquisition reserves(1)
Accrued expenses............. $ 4,120 $ 1,530 $ - $ 5,650

December 31, 2000
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Current receivables.......... $ 772 $ 2,533 $ 2,373 $ 932
Acquisition reserves(1)
Accrued expenses............. $ 5,650 $ 2,134 $ 2,402 $ 5,382


- ----------
(1) Additions were charged in connection with purchase accounting.


66


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Shareholder of Mediacom Capital Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Mediacom Capital Corporation
as of December 31, 2000 and 1999. These balance sheets are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
balance sheets based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the balance sheet is free of
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the balance sheet. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made
by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, the balance sheets referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Mediacom Capital Corporation as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.

ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
February 16, 2001


67


MEDIACOM CAPITAL CORPORATION

BALANCE SHEETS


December 31,
---------------------------
2000 1999
------------ ------------
ASSETS


Note receivable - from affiliate for issuance of common stock......... $ 100 $ 100
------------ ------------
Total assets................................................. $ 100 $ 100
============ ============

STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY

Common stock, par value $0.10; 200 shares authorized;
100 shares issued and outstanding................................ $ 10 $ 10
Additional paid-in capital............................................ $ 90 $ 90
------------ ------------
Total stockholder's equity................................... $ 100 $ 100
============ ============


The accompanying notes to the balance sheets
are an integral part of these financial statements.


68


MEDIACOM CAPITAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO THE BALANCE SHEETS

(1) Organization

Mediacom Capital Corporation ("Mediacom Capital"), a New York corporation
wholly-owned by Mediacom LLC ("Mediacom"), was organized on March 9, 1998 for
the sole purpose of acting as co-issuer with Mediacom of $200.0 million
aggregate principal amount of the 8 1/2% senior notes due April 15, 2008.
Interest on the 8 1/2% senior notes is payable semi-annually on April 15 and
October 15 of each year. Mediacom Capital does not conduct operations of its
own.

On February 26, 1999, Mediacom and Mediacom Capital jointly issued $125.0
million aggregate principal amount of 7 7/8% senior notes due on February 15,
2011. The net proceeds from this offering of approximately $121.9 million were
used to repay a substantial portion of outstanding bank debt under the bank
credit facilities of Mediacom's operating subsidiaries. Interest on the 7 7/8%
senior notes is payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year.

(2) Subsequent Events

On January 24, 2001, Mediacom and Mediacom Capital completed an offering
of $500.0 million of 9 1/2% senior notes due January 2013. Interest on the 9
1/2% senior notes will be payable semi-annually on January 15 and July 15 of
each year, commencing on July 15, 2001. Approximately $467.5 million of the net
proceeds were used to repay a substantial portion of outstanding indebtedness
and related accrued interest under the Company's subsidiary credit facilities.
The balance of the net proceeds is being used for general corporate purposes.

On February 7, 2001, Mediacom and Mediacom Capital filed a registration
statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission under which it may sell
debt securities, for a maximum amount of $1.0 billion. The Securities and
Exchange Commission declared this registration statement effective on February
13, 2001.


69


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None


70


PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANTS

MCC is our sole member. The following table sets forth certain information
with respect to the executive officers of MCC, Mediacom LLC and Mediacom
Capital. MCC serves as manager of our operating subsidiaries. The executive
officers of MCC, Mediacom LLC and Mediacom Capital are:

Name Age Position
---- --- --------
Rocco B. Commisso....... 51 Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
of Mediacom LLC and MCC and President and
Chief Executive Officer of Mediacom Capital
Mark E. Stephan......... 44 Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
Officer and Treasurer of Mediacom LLC and
MCC and Treasurer and Secretary of
Mediacom Capital
James M. Carey.......... 49 Senior Vice President, Operations of MCC
Charles J. Bartolotta... 46 Senior Vice President, Field Operations of
MCC
John G. Pascarelli...... 39 Senior Vice President, Marketing and
Consumer Services of MCC
Joseph Van Loan......... 59 Senior Vice President, Technology of MCC
Italia Commisso Weinand. 47 Senior Vice President, Programming and
Human Resources and Secretary of MCC

Rocco B. Commisso has 23 years of experience with the cable television
industry and has served as our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since
founding our predecessor company in July 1995. From 1986 to 1995, he served as
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and a director of Cablevision
Industries Corporation. Prior to that time, Mr. Commisso served as Senior Vice
President of Royal Bank of Canada's affiliate in the United States from 1981,
where he founded and directed a specialized lending group to media and
communications companies. Mr. Commisso began his association with the cable
industry in 1978 at The Chase Manhattan Bank, where he was assigned to manage
the bank's lending activities to communications firms including the cable
industry. He serves on the board of directors of the National Cable Television
Association and Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Mr. Commisso holds a
Bachelor of Science in Industrial Engineering and a Master of Business
Administration from Columbia University.

Mark E. Stephan has 14 years of experience with the cable television
industry and has served as our Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer since the commencement of our operations in March 1996. Before
joining us, Mr. Stephan served as Vice President, Finance for Cablevision
Industries from July 1993. Prior to that time, Mr. Stephan served as Manager of
the telecommunications and media lending group of Royal Bank of Canada.

James M. Carey has 19 years of experience in the cable television
industry. Before joining us in September 1997, Mr. Carey was founder and
President of Infinet Results, a telecommunications consulting firm, from
December 1996. Mr. Carey served as Executive Vice President, Operations at
MediaOne Group from August 1995 to November 1996, where he was responsible for
MediaOne's Atlanta cable operations. Prior to that time, he served as Regional
Vice President of Cablevision Industries' Southern region. Mr. Carey is a member
of the board of directors of the American Cable Association.


71


Charles J. Bartolotta has 18 years of experience in the cable television
industry. Before joining us in October 2000, Mr. Bartolotta served as Division
President for AT&T Broadband, LLC from July 1998, where he was responsible for
managing an operating division serving nearly three million customers. He served
as Regional Vice President of Telecommunications, Inc. from January 1997 and as
Vice President and General Manager for TKR Cable Company from 1989. Prior to
that time, Mr. Bartolotta held various management positions with Cablevision
Systems Corporation.

John G. Pascarelli has 20 years of experience in the cable television
industry. Before joining us in March 1998, Mr. Pascarelli served as Vice
President, Marketing for Helicon from January 1996 to February 1998 and as
Corporate Director of Marketing for Cablevision Industries from 1988 to 1995.
Prior to that time, Mr. Pascarelli served in various marketing and system
management capacities for Continental Cablevision, Cablevision Systems and
Storer Communications. Mr. Pascarelli is a member of the board of directors of
the Cable Television Administration and Marketing Association.

Joseph Van Loan has 28 years of experience in the cable television
industry. Before joining us in November 1996, Mr. Van Loan served as Senior Vice
President, Engineering for Cablevision Industries from 1990. Prior to that time,
he managed a private telecommunications consulting practice specializing in
domestic and international cable television and broadcasting and served as Vice
President, Engineering for Viacom Cable. Mr. Van Loan received the 1986 Vanguard
Award for Science and Technology from the National Cable Television Association.

Italia Commisso Weinand has 24 years of experience in the cable television
industry. Before joining us in April 1996, Ms. Weinand served as Regional
Manager for Comcast Corporation from July 1985. Prior to that time, Ms. Weinand
held various management positions with Tele-Communications, Times Mirror Cable
and Time Warner. She serves on the board of directors of the National Cable
Television Cooperative, Inc., a programming consortium consisting of small to
medium-sized multiple system operators. Ms. Weinand is the sister of Mr.
Commisso.


72


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

None of the executive officers of Mediacom and Mediacom Capital are
compensated for their services as such officers. Rather, executive management of
Mediacom and Mediacom Capital receive compensation from MCC.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

Mediacom Capital is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Mediacom. MCC is the sole
member of Mediacom. The address of MCC is 100 Crystal Run Road, Middletown, New
York 10941.


73


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Management Agreements

Pursuant to management agreements between MCC and our operating
subsidiaries, MCC is entitled to receive annual management fees in amounts not
to exceed 4.5% of our gross operating revenues. For the year ended December 31,
2000, MCC received $5.2 million of such management fees.

Other Relationships

JP Morgan, Credit Suisse First Boston and Salomon Smith Barney and their
affiliates perform various investment banking and commercial banking services
from time to time for us and our affiliates. As of December 31, 2000, two
affiliates of Chase Securities Inc. together hold approximately 5.3% of the
Class A common stock of MCC and individuals affiliated with Credit Suisse First
Boston Corporation beneficially own an aggregate of approximately 0.2% of the
Class A common stock of MCC. In addition, Chase Securities Inc. is an affiliate
of The Chase Manhattan Bank which is agent bank and a lender under our
subsidiary credit facilities. Credit Suisse First Boston Corporation is an
affiliate of Credit Suisse First Boston, New York Branch, which is a lender
under our subsidiary credit facilities. Salomon Smith Barney Inc. is an
affiliate of Citibank, N.A. which is also a lender under our subsidiary credit
facilities. The Chase Manhattan Bank, Credit Suisse First Boston, New York
Branch, and Citibank, N.A. received their proportionate share of any repayment
of amounts outstanding under the revolver portion of our subsidiary credit
facilities from the proceeds of our January 2001 offer and sale of $500.0
million of senior notes.


74


PART IV

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a) Financial Statements

Our financial statements as set forth in the Index to Consolidated
Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K are hereby
incorporated by reference.

(b) Exhibits

The following exhibits, which are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of
Regulation S-K, are filed herewith or, as noted, incorporated by reference
herein:

Exhibit
Number Exhibit Description
------ -------------------
2.1 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated April 29, 1999 between Mediacom
LLC and Triax Midwest Associates, L.P.(1)

2.2 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated May 25, 1999 among Mediacom LLC,
Charles D. Zylstra, Kara M. Zylstra and Trusts created under the
Will dated June 3, 1982 of Roger E. Zylstra, deceased, for the
benefit of Charles D. Zylstra and Kara M. Zylstra (2)

2.3 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 26, 2001 among Mediacom
Communications Corporation and the AT&T Broadband Parties (Central
Missouri) (7)

2.4 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 26, 2001 among Mediacom
Communications Corporation and the AT&T Broadband Parties
(Georgia) (7)

2.5 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 26, 2001 among Mediacom
Communications Corporation and the AT&T Broadband Parties
(Iowa/Illinois) (7)

2.6 Asset Purchase Agreement, dated February 26, 2001 among Mediacom
Communications Corporation and the AT&T Broadband Parties
(Southern Illinois) (7)

4.1 Indenture relating to 8 1/2% senior notes due 2008 of Mediacom LLC
and Mediacom Capital Corporation (4)

4.2 Indenture relating to 7 7/8% senior notes due 2011 of Mediacom LLC
and Mediacom Capital Corporation (5)

4.3 Indenture relating to 9 1/2% senior notes due 2013 of Mediacom LLC
and Mediacom Capital Corporation (7)

10.1(a) Credit Agreement dated as of September 30, 1999 for the Mediacom
USA Credit Facility (3)

10.1(b) Amendment No. 1 dated December 17, 1999 between Mediacom Southeast
LLC, Mediacom California LLC, Mediacom Delaware LLC, Mediacom
Arizona LLC and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as administrative agent
for the lenders. (7)

10.1(c) Amendment No. 2 dated February 4, 2000 between Mediacom Southeast
LLC, Mediacom California LLC, Mediacom Delaware LLC, Mediacom
Arizona LLC and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as administrative agent
for the lenders. (7)


75


10.2(a) Credit Agreement dated as of November 5, 1999 for the Mediacom
Midwest Credit Facility (3)

10.2(b) Amendment No. 2 dated December 17, 1999 between Mediacom Illinois
LLC, Mediacom Indiana LLC, Mediacom Iowa LLC, Mediacom Minnesota
LLC, Mediacom Wisconsin LLC, Zylstra Communications Corporation and
The Chase Manhattan Bank, as administrative agent for the lenders.
(7)

10.2(c) Amendment No. 2 dated February 4, 2000 between Mediacom Illinois
LLC, Mediacom Indiana LLC, Mediacom Iowa LLC, Mediacom Minnesota
LLC, Mediacom Wisconsin LLC, Zylstra Communications Corporation and
The Chase Manhattan Bank, as administrative agent for the lenders.
(7)

10.4 Form of Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement by and
among Mediacom Communications Corporation, Rocco B. Commisso, BMO
Financial, Inc., CB Capital Investors, L.P., Chase Manhattan
Capital, L.P., Morris Communications Corporation, Private Market
Fund, L.P. and U.S. Investor, Inc. (3)

10.6 Fifth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Mediacom LLC (6)

21.1 Subsidiaries of Mediacom LLC

23.1 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP

(c) Financial Statement Schedule

None.

(d) Reports on Form 8-K

None.

- ----------
* Compensatory plan

(1) Filed as an exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended March 31, 1999 of Mediacom LLC and Mediacom Capital
Corporation and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed as an exhibit to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 1999 of Mediacom LLC and Mediacom Capital
Corporation and incorporated herein by reference.

(3) Filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No.
333-90879) of Mediacom Communications Corporation and incorporated herein
by reference.

(4) Filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No.
333-57285) of Mediacom LLC and Mediacom Capital Corporation and
incorporated herein by reference.

(5) Filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No.
333-85893) of Mediacom LLC and Mediacom Capital Corporation and
incorporated herein by reference.

(6) Filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1999 of Mediacom LLC and incorporated herein by
reference.

(7) Filed as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2000 of Mediacom Communications Corporation and
incorporated herein by reference.


76


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MEDIACOM LLC


March 27, 2001 BY: /s/ ROCCO B. COMMISSO
----------------------------------
Rocco B. Commisso
Manager, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----


/s/ ROCCO B. COMMISSO Manager, Chairman and March 27, 2001
- ---------------------- Chief Executive Officer (principal
Rocco B. Commisso executive officer)


Senior Vice President, March 27, 2001
/s/ MARK E. STEPHAN Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
- ---------------------- (principal financial officer and
Mark E. Stephan principal accounting officer)


77


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MEDIACOM CAPITAL CORPORATION


March 27, 2001 BY: /s/ ROCCO B. COMMISSO
----------------------------------
Rocco B. Commisso
President, Chief Executive
Officer and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this
report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Signature Title Date
--------- ----- ----


/s/ ROCCO B. COMMISSO
- -------------------------- President, Chief Executive Officer March 27, 2001
Rocco B. Commisso and Director (principal
executive officer)


/s/ MARK E. STEPHAN Treasurer and Secretary March 27, 2001
- -------------------------- (principal financial officer
Mark E. Stephan and principal accounting officer)


78