Back to GetFilings.com
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2004 |
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to |
Commission file number: 001-15423
Grant Prideco, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction
of Incorporation or Organization) |
|
76-0312499
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
400 N. Sam Houston Pkwy. East
Suite 900
Houston, Texas
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
77060
(Zip Code) |
(281) 878-8000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of
the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class |
|
Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant: $1,450,165,174.
This figure is estimated as of June 30, 2004, at which date
the closing price of the registrants shares on the New
York Stock Exchange was $18.46 per share.
Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of
March 18, 2005: 124,636,659
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Listed below is the document parts of which are incorporated
herein by reference and the part of this report into which the
document is incorporated:
(1) Proxy Statement for 2005 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders Part III
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
FORM 10-K
PART I
General
We are the world leader in drill stem technology development and
drill pipe manufacturing, sales and service; a global leader in
drill bit technology, manufacturing, sales and service; and a
leading provider of high-performance engineered connections and
premium tubular products and services. Our drill stem and drill
bit products are used to drill oil and gas wells while our
tubular technology and services are primarily used in drilling
and completing oil and gas wells. Our customers include drilling
contractors; North American oil country tubular goods
(OCTG) distributors; major, independent and state-owned oil
companies; and other oilfield service companies. We primarily
operate through three business segments: (1) Drilling
Products and Services, (2) Drill Bits and (3) Tubular
Technology and Services. In the first quarter of 2004, we
announced an organizational restructuring that resulted in our
former Marine Products and Services businesses now being
reflected in the Tubular Technology and Services segment. Prior
periods have been restated for comparability.
Our business is primarily dependent on the level of oil and gas
drilling activity worldwide, which, in turn, depends on the
level of capital spending by major, independent and state-owned
exploration and production companies. This capital spending is
driven by current prices for oil and gas and the perceived
stability and sustainability of those prices. All of our
business segments generally track the level of domestic and
international drilling activity, however, their revenues, cash
flows and profitability follow the rig count at different stages
within the market cycles. Drill pipe demand is also a function
of customer inventory levels and typically lags changes in the
worldwide rig count. In a declining market, customers are
contractually required to purchase ordered drill pipe even if
they will no longer need that pipe. This creates a situation
where our customers have an inventory of excess drill pipe.
Consequently, in a market with increasing activity, customers
delay purchasing until they no longer have sufficient inventory
to sustain current and near-term expected future activity. Drill
bit demand and this segments earnings and cash flows have
closely tracked the worldwide rig count. Within our Tubular
Technology and Services segment, there are four product lines:
Atlas Bradford premium connections, Tube-Alloy accessories, TCA
premium casing and XL Systems large bore connections and
services. Results for this segments Atlas Bradford,
Tube-Alloy and TCA product lines predominantly follow changes in
North American (in particular Gulf of Mexico) offshore drilling,
deep drilling and natural gas drilling rig counts, but
short-term demand for Atlas Bradford products also can be
affected by inventories at OCTG distributors. The TCA product
line also is affected by the level of U.S. OCTG mill activity.
This segments XL Systems product line generally follows
the level of worldwide offshore drilling activity.
Additional information regarding our revenues and foreign
investments by geographic region can be found in the footnotes
to our consolidated financial statements starting on
page 33 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Grant Prideco was incorporated in Delaware on June 22,
1990. Our corporate headquarters is located at
400 N. Sam Houston Pkwy. East, Suite 900,
Houston, Texas 77060.
Drilling Products and Services Segment
Our Drilling Products and Services segment manufactures and
sells a variety of drill stem products used for the drilling of
oil and gas wells. The principal products sold by this segment
are: (1) drill pipe products, including tool joints,
(2) drill collars and heavyweight drill pipe and
(3) drill stem accessories.
Our drill stem products wear out through a combination of
friction and metal fatigue and generally are utilized by our
customers for a three to five year period assuming regular use.
Demand for our drill stem products is impacted primarily by
changes in drilling activity and worldwide rig activity.
However, since drill stem products are not consumables and
represent a capital investment by our customers, demand for
these products also is significantly impacted by the level of
inventory held by our customers and their perceptions as to
future activity and their near-term need for new drill stem
products. As a result, even in periods of rising or
2
strong drilling activity, our customers may elect to defer
purchases until their own inventory reaches levels at which
additional purchases are necessary to sustain their existing
drilling activities.
With the increased complexity of drilling activity, demand for
our proprietary line of
eXtremetm
drilling and other premium drilling products has remained
strong. This value-added product line coupled with our XT®
(eXtreme torque) connections is specifically designed for
extreme drilling conditions such as extended reach, directional,
horizontal, deep gas, offshore and ultra-deepwater drilling, as
well as high-temperature, high-pressure and corrosive well
conditions. Operators and drilling contractors have embraced
this product line as a way to improve their efficiency and
assure performance when drilling under extreme conditions. We
believe that our eXtreme product line offers some of the
highest-performance drilling products ever brought to market and
provides our customers with engineered solutions for some of
their most challenging drilling applications. In addition to our
eXtreme product line, our premium drill pipe products can also
include our
CT-M57tm
connections that can withstand external pressures exceeding
25,000 psi and internal pressures nearing 30,000 psi, along with
proprietary sour-service grades and other proprietary products.
Our drill stem products are sold to a variety of customers,
including oil and gas drilling contractors, rental tool
companies and major, independent and state-owned oil and gas
companies. Our customers purchasing decisions are
generally based on operational requirements, quality, price and
delivery. The principal competitors for our drill stem products
include Drilco Group (a subsidiary of Smith International Inc.),
Texas Steel Conversion, OMSCO Industries (a subsidiary of
ShawCor Ltd.), IDPA and various smaller local manufacturers in
the U.S. and in foreign countries. We typically compete on
quality, technology, price and delivery and we believe we are
the technological leader in our industry.
The following is a description of our principal drill stem
products:
Drill pipe is the principal tool, other than the rig, required
for the drilling of an oil or gas well. Its primary purpose is
to connect the above-surface drilling rig to the drill bit. A
drilling rig will typically have an inventory of 10,000 to
25,000 feet of drill pipe depending on the size and service
requirements of the rig. Joints of drill pipe are connected to
each other with a welded-on tool joint to form what is commonly
referred to as the drill string or drill stem.
When a drilling rig is operating, motors mounted on the rig
rotate the drill pipe and drill bit. In addition to connecting
the drilling rig to the drill bit, drill pipe provides a
mechanism to steer the drill bit and serves as a conduit for
drilling fluids and cuttings. Drill pipe is a capital good that
can be used for the drilling of multiple wells. Once a well is
completed, the drill pipe may be used again in drilling another
well until the drill pipe becomes damaged or wears out.
In recent years, the depth and complexity of the wells our
customers drill, as well as the specifications and requirements
of the drill pipe they purchase, have substantially increased.
We estimate that over 95% of the drill pipe we sell outside of
China is required to meet specifications exceeding minimum
American Petroleum Institute (API) standards. We offer a
broad line of premium drilling products designed for the
offshore, international and domestic drilling markets. Our
premium drilling products include our proprietary lines of XT
connections and
57/8-inch
drill pipe that delivers hydraulic performance superior to
standard
51/2-inch
drill pipe and weight benefits superior to standard
65/8-inch
drill pipe.
Drill collars are used in the drilling process to place weight
on the drill bit for better control and penetration. Drill
collars are located directly above the drill bit and are
manufactured from a solid steel bar to provide necessary weight.
3
|
|
|
Heavyweight Drill Pipe and Other Drill Stem
Products |
Heavyweight drill pipe is a thick-walled seamless tubular
product that is less rigid than a drill collar. Heavyweight
drill pipe provides a gradual transition zone between the
heavier drill collar and the lighter drill pipe.
We also provide kellys, subs, pup joints (short and odd-sized
tubular products) and other drill stem accessories. These
products all perform special functions within the drill string
as part of the drilling process.
|
|
|
IntelliServtm
Joint Venture |
We own 50% of this joint venture partially sponsored by the
U.S. Department of Energy to commercialize intelligent
drill pipe that permits real-time transfer of data through the
drill string. This modified drill pipe is embedded with a
telemetry system that permits two-way data transmission along
the drill string at rates of up to two million bits per second,
which is exponentially greater than the data transmission rates
for measurement in the drilling and logging systems utilized
today. We currently are in the field trial testing and
refinement stage and have not yet introduced a product
commercially. Due to the unproven nature of the technology and
that it is still in its development state, we can provide no
assurances that it will be successful or be able to be marketed
and sold on a commercial basis.
Our major drill stem manufacturing plants are located in the
U.S., China, Italy, Mexico, Singapore and Indonesia. These
products are sold and serviced through over 16 sales and service
facilities located around the world. During the fourth quarter
of 2003, we completed an evaluation of our existing
manufacturing capacities and locations. Following this
manufacturing rationalization study, we determined that we had
excess capacity and duplicate operations in certain locations
that could be eliminated without affecting our ability to
quickly and efficiently react to market increases. As a result,
we shut down our Bryan, Texas facility, significantly downsized
our Canadian operations and rationalized certain operations in
our Veracruz, Mexico and Navasota, Texas locations.
We believe we are the only fully vertically integrated drill
pipe manufacturer in the world, controlling each facet of the
drill pipe manufacturing process. We manufacture (through a
50.01% owned joint venture) the green tube (drill pipe tube that
has not been heat-treated or processed), the tool joint and
complete the finishing and welding operations. We believe this
unique manufacturing strategy provides us with significant
competitive advantages over other drill pipe manufacturers,
including those located outside the U.S. that may have
labor and other cost advantages over our U.S.-based
manufacturing operations. By controlling each facet of the drill
pipe manufacturing process, we are able to tailor our processes
and techniques to meet our customers demanding product
specifications, particularly with respect to green drill pipe
tubes with body wall thickness, wall uniformity and other
features that exceed minimum API standards and are not readily
available from third-party mills.
Drill Bits Segment
Our Drill Bits segments products and services are
comprised of the operations of ReedHycalog. This segment is a
leading global designer, manufacturer and distributor of drill
bits and related technology to the oil and gas industry. This
segment also services its customer base through a technical
sales and marketing network in virtually every significant oil
and gas-producing region in the world. Drill bits are generally
sold directly to oil and gas operators and, to a lesser extent,
drilling contractors on turnkey and footage contracts.
Competition is based on technical performance, price and service.
The drill bit market consists of two product types: fixed-cutter
bits and roller-cone bits. We manufacture and sell both product
types on a global basis.
Drilling through subsurface strata to locate oil and gas
requires a drill bit to be run on drill pipe or conveyed through
coiled tubing and rotated by surface rig equipment or downhole
motors and turbines. Selecting the optimal bit for a particular
application represents one of the many challenges faced by oil
and
4
gas companies and drilling contractors in planning a well.
Similar to the drill stem market, the primary market driver is
worldwide drilling activity or, more specifically, total footage
drilled. In addition, demand is a function of well depth and
complexity with demand for fixed-cutter bits tied more strongly
to offshore, directional or horizontal drilling.
Drill bits constitute a very small percentage of total well
costs, but are a critical component of well-construction
economics. The time required to drill a well is directly related
to a drill bits rate of penetration and footage drilled
prior to becoming dull and requiring replacement. On a
cost-per-foot basis, selecting the appropriate drill bit
significantly reduces drilling costs by decreasing drilling time
and the number of trips required in and out of a well.
Typically, roller-cone bits are most appropriate for shallow
land rig operations, while higher performance roller-cone or
fixed-cutter bits with better rates of penetration and longer
lives offer the most economic choice for offshore and deep wells
where rig rates and trip costs are high. However, there is a
trend towards increased use of fixed-cutter bits in operations
that traditionally have utilized roller-cone bits.
We provide a complete series of drill bits incorporating
advanced materials technology and a range of
performance-enhancing features. This broad product offering
provides customers with maximum flexibility in selecting drill
bits. In addition, we provide drill bit selection and
well-planning services through our field sales organization and
bit optimization engineers.
Our principal competitors for the sale of drill bits are Hughes
Christensen (a division of Baker Hughes Inc.), Smith Bits (a
division of Smith International Inc.), and Security DBS (a
division of Halliburton Company) as well as numerous smaller
competitors throughout the world.
ReedHycalog first manufactured fixed-cutter natural diamond bits
in 1953 and synthetic polycrystalline diamond compact
(PDC) bits in 1974.
The predominant fixed-cutter bit used in the oil and gas
industry is the PDC bit. PDC bits have no moving parts and are
therefore intrinsically more reliable than roller-cone bits, but
they are generally more sensitive to geological changes. PDC
bits drill with a shearing action to remove rock by dragging the
diamond elements through the formation as the drill bit body
rotates. PDC bits allow faster rates of drilling penetration and
can drill complete well sections without the need for bit
replacement. As a result, they are used in high cost drilling
locations (such as offshore or in remote locations) where their
technical advantages reduce drilling time sufficiently to
justify the higher cost product.
We provide fixed-cutter bit types and technology under various
brand names including
TReXtm,
SteeringWheeltm,
Rotary Steerable and many others. One of the most significant
innovations is our TReX cutter technology, which significantly
increases abrasion resistance (wear life) without sacrificing
impact resistance (toughness). This technology produces material
that maintains a sharp, low-wearing cutting edge that is
producing results that exceed conventional standards for PDC bit
performance.
During 2004, this segment acquired the assets of Novatek
International, Inc. (Novatek), a manufacturer of PDC cutters, as
well as Diamond Products International, Inc., a leading provider
of bi-center bits.
ReedHycalog has manufactured roller-cone bits since 1916 and
produces roller-cone bits for a wide variety of oil and gas
drilling applications. Roller-cone bits consist of three
rotating cones that have cutting teeth, which penetrate the
formation through a crushing action as the cones rotate in
conjunction with the rotation of the drill pipe. This cutting
mechanism, while less efficient than fixed-cutter bits, is more
versatile in harder formations, or where the geology is
changing. We manufacture roller-cone drill bits with milled
teeth and with tungsten carbide insert teeth, which have a
longer life in harder formations.
We market our roller-cone products and technology globally under
various brand names including
TuffDutytm,
Titantm
and
TuffCuttertm.
5
We manufacture fixed-cutter bits in Stonehouse (U.K.) and in
Houston, Texas and roller-cone bits in Singapore and a separate
facility in Houston, Texas. In January 2005, in connection with
an expansion of our Singapore operations, a significant portion
of the production of roller-cone bits has been moved from
Houston, Texas to Singapore. All facilities are ISO 9001 and
14001 certified.
We market our drill bits through a global sales and marketing
network with our employees strategically positioned around the
world. Sales people are located in North and South America,
Europe, CIS, Africa, Middle East and Asia. The sales force is
technologically sophisticated and has developed strong regional
expertise.
Tubular Technology and Services Segment
Our Tubular Technology and Services segment provides a full
range of premium threaded connections for casing, production
tubing and other accessory equipment. This segment also
manufactures and sells premium casing for use with third-party
connections and is a leading supplier of tubulars and threaded
connections for the large-bore tubular market. During 2003, we
made a strategic decision to exit the manufacture and sale of
premium tubing. Additionally, in 2004 we sold our Texas Arai
couplings business which is now reflected as discontinued
operations in our accompanying financial statements.
Although we sell our large-bore tubulars and connections on a
world wide basis, the demand for the majority of our tubular
technology and services is heavily dependent upon North American
natural gas drilling activity, and it is more particularly
dependent upon rigs drilling for deep gas in the Gulf of Mexico.
On a short-term basis, demand for many of these products is also
affected by the level of inventory held by distributors of OCTG.
Distributors often reduce purchases until their inventory
positions are brought in line with then-prevailing market
conditions.
Over the long-term, a key factor positively impacting demand for
our tubular technology and services is the U.S. dependence
on natural gas as a fuel. Gas wells generally encounter higher
reservoir pressure and corrosive environments, which both
typically increase proportionally with increased depths.
Therefore, gas wells can require larger-diameter tubulars with
thicker walls, higher strength steel grades and special
metallurgy that is resistant to corrosive elements. For these
wells, premium connections, as opposed to standardized API
connections, are typically used to ensure the integrity of the
tubulars throughout the life of the well. Also, depletion rates
for natural gas wells in the U.S. have significantly
increased during the past decade, which indicates that more
wells will need to be drilled to keep production levels
constant. This increased demand in North America for natural gas
should increase the number of natural gas wells being drilled
and completed, thus increasing demand for our tubular technology
and services.
The following is a description of our principal premium
connections and tubular products and services:
|
|
|
Atlas Bradford® Threading and Service |
We market our premium engineered connections primarily through
our Atlas Bradford product line, which has been recognized as
one of the industrys leading connections for more than
40 years. We offer this product line primarily in the U.S.
and Canada due to a licensing arrangement that we previously
entered into in which the international rights to our Atlas
Bradford connection line were licensed to a third party. We also
manufacture and sell connections for drilling with casing and
expandable operations on a worldwide basis and recently
introduced our licensed
ATS-Etm
semi-premium connection for sale on a worldwide basis.
Our customers use premium connections when they need a
connection that maintains a gas-tight seal while subjected to
extreme tension, pressure and compression forces or while
drilling near environmentally sensitive areas. The failure of a
premium connection can be a catastrophic event, leading to the
loss of a well or a blowout.
We actively promote our premium connections to oil and gas
operators, the ultimate end-users of the products, while selling
the premium connections through a network of major distributors
in the U.S. and
6
Canada. Additionally, we provide tubular (casing, liner and
tubing) string design recommendations, a full range test and
demonstration facility, plus field service personnel to assist
in the running of the products. Our principal competitors for
premium connections are Hydril Company, Vallourec and Mannesmann
Tubes, the Tenaris Group, Sumitomo, Kawasaki Steel, Lone Star
Steel, Citra Tubindo, Hunting Interlock, Inc., Benoit, Inc. and
numerous other competitors domestically and internationally.
Tubular accessories are manufactured and sold through our
Tube-Alloy product line and include flow control equipment, such
as vacuum-insulated tubing, pup joints and landing nipples. Our
vacuum-insulated tubing represents an advanced flow-control
solution used to minimize paraffin deposits, gas hydrate
formation and annular pressure buildup in deepwater production
environments. Through our Tube-Alloy product line, we thread
third-party tubular products with our Atlas Bradford connections
as well as with third-party connections licensed to us. Our
competitors for these products and services include Hunting
Interlock, Inc., Benoit, Inc., Oil Tools International,
international steel mills and numerous other regional
competitors in the U.S. and worldwide.
Premium casing products are offered through our TCA product
line. These product offerings are designed to address that
segment of the oilfield tubular casing market that requires
special product characteristics and performance not generally
offered by the tubular steel mills. Our TCA product line also
provides tubular processing services for major tubular steel
mills.
We manufacture and sell premium casing, which includes
high-performance, proprietary and custom-designed OCTG from 5 to
17 inches in diameter as well as API casing. Our premium
casing is designed for critical applications. To capitalize on
the high value spot market, we maintain common and high-alloy
green tube inventories to provide quick delivery of
custom-finished casing and coupling stock. To meet exact
customer specifications and delivery requirements, we offer our
specialized Premium Pipe
Paktm
product line. Premium Pipe Pak is an innovative bundling of
proprietary casing, premium engineered connections and
inspection services offered in conjunction with an independent
third-party inspection company. This product line allows the
customer the option of having threaded and inspected
critical-service casing shipped rig-ready directly
to the customers well site, which reduces costs and
delivery times.
Our XL Systems product line offers the customer an
integrated package of large-bore tubular products and services
for offshore wells. This product line includes our proprietary
line of wedge thread marine connections on large-bore tubulars
and related engineering and design services. We provide this
product line for drive pipe, jet strings and conductor casing.
We also offer weld-on connections and service personnel in
connection with the installation of these products. We also
completed development of our new high strength
Vipertm
weld-on connector that we believe will permit us to penetrate
traditional markets that do not require the enhanced performance
of our proprietary wedge thread design.
Risers range from
95/8-inches
to
133/8-inches
and represent that section of the offshore production system
from the wellhead and mudline up to the offshore production
platform, which is typically either a floating platform, tension
leg platform or SPAR. We currently offer top tension production
risers and have begun to bundle our riser products with other
third-party technology to offer a complete line of riser
products. Our risers are sold with our various marine riser
connectors. The tubular and coupling components of our riser
products are often manufactured for our XL Systems product line
by our Atlas Bradford and TCA product lines.
Our XL Systems product line competes with DrilQuip, Vetco, Oil
States, Franks and various other competitors domestically and
internationally.
7
Our Tubular Technology and Services segment operations are
located in Texas, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Vlissingen, The
Netherlands and Canada. We also offer accessory threading
services in Venezuela. In connection with our TCA operations in
Muskogee, Oklahoma, we have entered into a long-term supply
agreement with U.S. Steel Corporation that we expect will
supply the majority of our steel needs at this location for the
next several years. In addition, during the latter part of 2003,
we moved our XL Systems Asia Pacific facility from Singapore to
a new manufacturing location in Batam Island, Indonesia.
Other Segment
Our Other segment included our industrial drill pipe operations
and our construction casing and water well operations. We exited
the industrial drill pipe business in the second quarter of 2003
and the construction casing and water well business with the
sale of Star Iron Works (Star) in the first quarter of 2003. As
of the end 2004, the remaining inventory related to the
industrial drill pipe operations had been sold.
In 2003, we moved our joint ventures relating to POS-GRIP
technology from our Tubular Technology and Services segment to
our Other segment. Prior periods have been restated to reflect
this change. During the first quarter of 2004, we sold to our
partner our rights to the POS-GRIP technology for jack-up
exploration applications and have granted our partner an option
to purchase our rights to POS-GRIP technology for subsea
applications.
Other Business Data
We maintain an active research and engineering program. The
program improves existing products and processes, develops new
products and processes, and improves engineering standards and
practices that serve the changing needs of our customers. Our
expenditures for research and engineering activities totaled
$20.5 million, $17.7 million and $3.2 million in
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. These costs do not include
amounts expended by our IntelliServ joint venture, which is
accounted for as an equity-method investment. The significant
increase from 2002 to 2003 related primarily to the ReedHycalog
acquisition, which has an extensive research and engineering
program.
Many of our business lines rely on patents and proprietary
technologies. We currently have numerous patents issued or
pending. Many of our patents provide us with competitive
advantages in our markets. Although we consider our patents and
our patent protection to be important for our existing business
and for the development of new technologies and businesses, we
do not believe that the loss of one or more of our patents would
have a material adverse effect on our business as a whole.
As of December 31, 2004, we had a product backlog of
$270.5 million, representing 29% of our total revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2004, which we expect to
complete during 2005. This backlog was comprised of
$203.3 million from Drilling Products and Services and
$67.2 million from Tubular Technology and Services. We had
a product backlog as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, of
$120.6 million and $87.2 million, respectively. These
year-end backlogs represented 15% and 14% of our total revenues
for those years, respectively. The increase in product backlog
from 2003 to 2004 reflects the strengthening of overall market
conditions for oil and gas drilling.
We believe that we maintain insurance coverage that is adequate
for the risks involved. However, there is always a risk that our
insurance may not be sufficient to cover any particular loss or
that our insurance may not cover all losses. For example, while
we maintain product liability insurance, this type of insurance
is limited in
8
coverage, and it is possible that an adverse claim could arise
that exceeds our coverage. Further, insurance rates are subject
to wide fluctuations, and changes in coverage could result in
increases in our cost or higher deductibles and retentions.
We do not maintain political risk insurance (generally designed
to cover expropriation and nationalization exposures), but do
maintain all-risk property insurance that covers losses from
insurrection, civil commotion and uprising. This insurance does
not cover losses resulting from a declared state of war and
provides a limited range of coverage from terrorist attacks.
|
|
|
Federal Regulation and Environmental Matters |
Our operations are subject to federal, state, local and foreign
laws and regulations relating to the energy industry in general
and the environment in particular. Environmental laws have over
the years become more stringent, and compliance with such laws
increases our overall cost of operations. In addition to
affecting our ongoing operations, applicable environmental laws
can require us to remediate contamination at our properties, at
properties formerly owned or operated by us, and at facilities
to which we sent waste materials for treatment or disposal and
impose liability for related damages of natural resources. While
we are not currently aware of any situation involving an
environmental claim that would likely have a material adverse
effect on our business, it is always possible that an
environmental claim could arise with respect to one or more of
our current businesses or a business or property that one of our
predecessors owned or used that could have a material adverse
effect.
Our expenditures to comply with environmental laws and
regulations were not material in 2004, and are not expected to
be material in 2005. We also believe that we are in material
compliance with applicable environmental requirements and our
costs for compliance with environmental laws and regulations are
generally within the same range as those of our competitors.
However, we can offer no assurance that our costs to comply with
environmental laws will not be material in the future. Prior to
our acquisition, ReedHycalog was conducting remediation of
groundwater at certain of its facilities. Based on currently
available information, the indemnification provided by
Schlumberger in the acquisition agreement and contractual
indemnities from other third parties, we do not believe that
these matters will result in any material effect on the
Companys capital expenditures, earnings or competitive
position. However, there can be no guarantee that the
indemnities will be available to cover all costs or that
material expenditures will not be incurred.
Our operations are also affected by trade laws affecting the
import of OCTG, drill pipe and other products into the
U.S. Although the majority of our manufacturing operations,
including the capital investment, employees and costs and
expenses associated therewith, are located in the U.S., we have
key manufacturing facilities located outside the U.S., including
our drill bit operations in the U.K. and Singapore, our 50.01%
owned Voest-Alpine Tubulars GmbH & Co KG (Voest-Alpine)
subsidiary located in Austria and our tool joint manufacturing
operations in Mexico and Italy, that support our domestic
operations. Our premium tubular business also is affected by the
level of foreign imports of tubular products into the U.S.
Imports of products from our foreign locations that are utilized
by our domestic manufacturing operations can be the subject of
investigations, including antidumping and countervailing duty
orders, into whether such products are unfairly priced at low
levels (i.e., dumping) and causing material damage to the
domestic industry, as well as investigations under
Section 201 of the trade laws into whether such imports
have seriously damaged the domestic industry. Although we
believe we are the clear price leader for drill pipe and other
drill stem products and do not utilize imports from our foreign
facilities to dump our products, our products have
been, and may in the future be, the subject of such
investigations.
As of February 28, 2005, we had 4,064 employees. Certain of
our operations are subject to union contracts. These contracts,
however, cover approximately 9% of our total employees. We
believe our relationship with our employees is good.
9
We file annual, quarterly, and other reports and other
information with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act). You may read and copy any materials
that we file with the SEC at the SECs Public Reference
Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549. You may
obtain additional information about the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the SEC
maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that
contains reports, proxy information statements, and other
information regarding issuers that file electronically with the
SEC, including us.
We also make available free of charge on or through our Internet
site (http://www.grantprideco.com) our Annual Report on
Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current
Reports on Form 8-K, and other information statements and,
if applicable, amendments to those reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act as soon as
reasonably practicable after we electronically file such
material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.
The following table describes the principal manufacturing, other
facilities and offices we currently own or lease. We believe
that our manufacturing facilities are well maintained and
suitable for their intended purpose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size | |
|
|
Location |
|
Tenure |
|
(Sq.Ft.) | |
|
Utilization |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Drilling Products and Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Navasota, Texas
|
|
Owned |
|
|
347,000 |
|
|
Manufacture of drill stem products |
Veracruz, Mexico
|
|
Leased |
|
|
303,400 |
|
|
Manufacture of tool joints and drill pipe |
Baimi Town, Jiangyan, Jiangsu China
|
|
Leased |
|
|
49,428 |
|
|
Manufacture of drill pipe |
Jianjin, China
|
|
Owned |
|
|
100,912 |
|
|
Manufacture of unfinished upset to grade drill pipe |
Turin, Italy
|
|
Owned |
|
|
60,400 |
|
|
Manufacture of tool joints |
Jurong, Singapore
|
|
Leased |
|
|
33,600 |
|
|
Manufacture of drill collars, accessories, and threading services |
Batam Island, Indonesia
|
|
Owned |
|
|
25,984 |
|
|
Manufacture of drill pipe |
|
Drill Bits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
|
Owned |
|
|
403,000 |
|
|
Manufacture of roller-cone bits |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
50,256 |
|
|
Manufacture of fixed-cutter bits |
|
|
Leased |
|
|
58,920 |
|
|
Manufacture of bi-center drill bits |
Stonehouse, U.K.
|
|
Owned |
|
|
71,000 |
|
|
Manufacture of fixed-cutter bits |
Jurong, Singapore
|
|
Leased |
|
|
169,663 |
|
|
Manufacture of roller-cone bits |
Provo, Utah
|
|
Leased |
|
|
39,038 |
|
|
Manufacture of PDC cutters |
|
Tubular Technology and Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma
|
|
Leased |
|
|
195,900 |
|
|
Manufacture of TCA premium casing and premium threading |
Houston, Texas
|
|
Leased |
|
|
249,893 |
|
|
Manufacture of Atlas Bradford connectors |
|
|
Owned |
|
|
54,500 |
|
|
Premium threading services and manufacture of tubular accessories |
Houma, Louisiana
|
|
Owned |
|
|
101,150 |
|
|
Manufacture and threading of downhole accessories |
Broussard, Louisiana
|
|
Owned |
|
|
55,920 |
|
|
Premium threading of downhole and specialty equipment |
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Size | |
|
|
Location |
|
Tenure |
|
(Sq.Ft.) | |
|
Utilization |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
Casper, Wyoming
|
|
Owned |
|
|
28,181 |
|
|
Premium threading of casing and tubing |
Beaumont, Texas
|
|
Owned |
|
|
17,838 |
|
|
Premium threading services and manufacture of conductors |
Vlissingen, The Netherlands
|
|
Leased |
|
|
65,800 |
|
|
Premium threading services and manufacture of conductors |
Batam Island, Indonesia
|
|
Owned |
|
|
14,400 |
|
|
Premium threading services and manufacture of conductors |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Houston, Texas
|
|
Leased |
|
|
39,350 |
|
|
Corporate headquarters |
The Woodlands, Texas
|
|
Leased |
|
|
61,831 |
|
|
Sales and administrative offices |
|
|
Item 3. |
Legal Proceedings |
In the ordinary course of business, we are the subject of
various claims and litigation. We maintain insurance to cover
many of our potential losses and we are subject to various
self-retentions and deductibles with respect to our insurance.
See Business Other Business Data
Insurance. Although we are subject to various ongoing
items of litigation, we do not believe that any of the items of
litigation that we are currently subject to will result in any
material uninsured losses to us. It is possible, however, that
an unexpected judgment could be rendered against us in the cases
in which we are involved that could be uninsured and beyond the
amounts that we currently have reserved or anticipate incurring
for that matter.
|
|
Item 4. |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
No matters were submitted to a vote of the stockholders of the
Company during the fourth quarter of 2004.
PART II
|
|
Item 5. |
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities |
Our common stock has a par value of $0.01 per share and is
listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange
(NYSE) under the symbol GRP. The following
table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low
sales prices of our common stock as reported on the NYSE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$ |
15.99 |
|
|
$ |
12.87 |
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
18.56 |
|
|
|
13.90 |
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
20.91 |
|
|
|
16.82 |
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
22.31 |
|
|
|
18.80 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$ |
12.81 |
|
|
$ |
9.77 |
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
14.87 |
|
|
|
10.75 |
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
12.26 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
13.68 |
|
|
|
10.00 |
|
We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock since
becoming a public company. We currently intend to retain any
earnings for use in our business and do not anticipate paying
cash dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, our
senior credit facility and indenture governing our
95/8% Senior
Notes Due
11
2007 and our 9% Senior Notes Due 2009 contain restrictions
on our ability to pay dividends. Refer to
Part II Item 7
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Capital Resources for further information.
At March 18, 2005, we had 2,815 record holders of our
common stock.
|
|
Item 6. |
Selected Financial Data |
The following table sets forth certain of our historical
financial data. Until we were spun off on April 14, 2000,
we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of Weatherford International,
LTD. (Weatherford). This information has been prepared as if we
had been a stand-alone company during 2000. Additionally, in
April 2004 we sold the assets and business of our Texas Arai
division and prior year results related to this division have
been reclassified as discontinued operations. This information
should be read in conjunction with Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The
following information may not be indicative of our future
operating results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
2000 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
945,643 |
|
|
$ |
803,818 |
|
|
$ |
609,390 |
|
|
$ |
688,056 |
|
|
$ |
451,659 |
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
141,672 |
|
|
|
45,297 |
|
|
|
46,995 |
|
|
|
59,976 |
|
|
|
(11,029 |
) |
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations
|
|
|
64,793 |
|
|
|
4,657 |
|
|
|
13,690 |
|
|
|
24,809 |
|
|
|
(14,716 |
) |
|
Income (Loss) Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
|
|
|
55,266 |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
13,046 |
|
|
|
28,090 |
|
|
|
(14,696 |
) |
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
55,266 |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
6,634 |
(b) |
|
|
28,090 |
|
|
|
(16,485 |
)(c) |
Income (Loss) Per Share(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.53 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
Net Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
0.45 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.06 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
(0.15 |
) |
Balance Sheet Data (At End of Period):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
1,344,466 |
|
|
$ |
1,262,061 |
|
|
$ |
1,315,349 |
|
|
$ |
915,598 |
|
|
$ |
892,564 |
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
377,773 |
|
|
|
426,853 |
|
|
|
478,846 |
|
|
|
205,024 |
|
|
|
219,104 |
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
705,541 |
|
|
|
606,114 |
|
|
|
588,872 |
|
|
|
468,967 |
|
|
|
431,503 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
We did not have a separate capital structure prior to being spun
off from Weatherford on April 14, 2000; accordingly we have
calculated our 2000 pro forma earnings per share using pro forma
basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding prior to
the spin-off. In calculating our pro forma basic weighted
average shares, we have adjusted Weatherfords historical
basic weighted average shares outstanding for the applicable
period to reflect the number of shares that would have been
outstanding at the time assuming a distribution of one share of
our common stock for each share of Weatherford common stock. The
effect of stock options and restricted stock is not included in
the 2000 diluted weighted average shares computation because to
do so would have been anti-dilutive. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes a cumulative effect of accounting change related to
Financial Accounting Standards Board (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets of
$6.4 million, net of tax. |
12
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Includes a cumulative effect of accounting change related to SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 101 of
$1.8 million, net of tax. |
|
|
Item 7. |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion is intended to assist you in
understanding our financial position as of December 31,
2004 and 2003, and our results of operations for the three-year
period ended December 31, 2004. This discussion should be
read with our consolidated financial statements and their notes
included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The discussion of our results of operations and financial
condition contains statements relating to our future results,
including certain projections and trends, which constitute
forward-looking statements. Certain risks and uncertainties may
cause actual results to be materially different from projected
results contained in these forward-looking statements and other
disclosures. These risks and uncertainties are more fully
described under Forward-Looking Statements and
Exposures below. As used herein, unless otherwise required
by the context, the term Grant Prideco refers to
Grant Prideco, Inc. and the terms we,
our, and similar words refer to Grant Prideco and
its subsidiaries. The use herein of such terms as
group, organization, we,
us, our and its, or
references to specific entities, are not intended to be a
precise description of corporate relationships.
General
We are the world leader in drill stem technology development and
drill pipe manufacturing, sales and service; a global leader in
drill bit technology, manufacturing, sales and service; and a
leading provider of high-performance engineered connections and
premium tubular products and services. We operate primarily
through three business segments: (1) Drilling Products and
Services, (2) Drill Bits and (3) Tubular Technology
and Services.
Market Trends and Outlook
Our business is primarily dependent on the level of oil and gas
drilling activity worldwide, which, in turn, depends on the
level of capital spending by major, independent and state-owned
exploration and production companies. This capital spending is
driven by current prices for oil and gas and the perceived
stability and sustainability of those prices. All of our
business segments generally track the level of domestic and
international drilling activity, however, their revenues, cash
flows and profitability follow the rig count at different stages
within the market cycles. Drill pipe demand is also a function
of customer inventory levels and typically lags changes in the
worldwide rig count. In a declining market, customers are
contractually required to purchase ordered drill pipe even if
they will no longer need that pipe. This creates a situation
where our customers have an inventory of excess drill pipe.
Consequently, in a market with increasing activity, customers
delay purchasing until they no longer have sufficient inventory
to sustain current and near-term expected future activity. Drill
bit demand and this segments earnings and cash flows have
closely tracked the worldwide rig count. Within our Tubular
Technology and Services segment, there are four product lines:
Atlas Bradford premium connections, Tube-Alloy accessories, TCA
premium casing and XL Systems large bore connections and
services. Results for this segments Atlas Bradford,
Tube-Alloy and TCA product lines predominantly follow changes in
North American (in particular Gulf of Mexico) offshore drilling,
deep drilling and natural gas drilling rig counts, but
short-term demand for Atlas Bradford products also can be
affected by inventories at OCTG distributors. The TCA product
line also is affected by the level of U.S. OCTG mill activity.
This segments XL Systems product line generally follows the
level of worldwide offshore drilling activity.
13
For the periods below, the revenues, profitability, and cash
flows from each of our business segments have been impacted by
changes in oil and gas prices and rig counts. The following
table sets forth certain information with respect to oil and gas
prices at the dates indicated and the North American (U.S. and
Canadian) and international rig counts for the periods reflected:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
WTI Oil(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
$ |
41.51 |
|
|
$ |
31.06 |
|
|
$ |
26.17 |
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
43.45 |
|
|
|
32.52 |
|
|
|
31.20 |
|
Henry Hub Gas(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
$ |
5.90 |
|
|
$ |
5.49 |
|
|
$ |
3.37 |
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
6.01 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
4.59 |
|
North American Rig Count(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
International Rig Count(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
771 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
869 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Price per barrel of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude as
of the dates presented above. Source: Bloomberg Energy/
Commodity Service. |
|
(b) |
|
Price per MMBtu as of the dates presented above. Source:
Bloomberg Energy/ Commodity Service. |
|
(c) |
|
Source: Baker Hughes Rig Count (International Rig Count excludes
China and the Former Soviet Union). |
Future Market Trends and Expectations
Looking forward, we anticipate that our results will be based on
the level of drilling activity and our customers views
regarding the sustainability of that activity. These perceptions
depend on their views regarding the sustainability of oil and
natural gas prices. Commodity prices were particularly strong
during 2004, and this resulted in strong drilling activity.
When forecasting our results for 2005, we relied on several
assumptions about the market, our customers, our suppliers and
the Company. In the market, we anticipate continuing improvement
in drilling activity, with average worldwide rig counts up 4% to
5% over 2004. Importantly, we anticipate that our customers will
continue to believe in the sustainability of drilling activity.
For all business units, we believe price improvements are
justifiable and achievable, and we will be able to modestly
increase prices to our customers. As such, we believe our 2005
results will improve over 2004. On December 31, 2004, total
backlog was up $149.9 million from December 31, 2003
to $270.5 million: this is the highest level since the
company became public in April, 2000. The improved backlog with
strong drilling activity are expected to translate into a 10% to
15% increase in volumes at our Drilling Products and Services
segment. Revenues at our Drill Bits segment should move
commensurate with the rig count, and our Tubular Technology and
Services segment, with its strong leverage to the weak Gulf of
Mexico rig count, should benefit from a full year of
restructurings and pricing improvements made during 2004.
14
Results of Operations
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to the Year
Ended December 31, 2003 |
The following table summarizes the results of the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Products and Services
|
|
$ |
390,617 |
|
|
$ |
308,297 |
|
|
Drill Bits
|
|
|
326,918 |
|
|
|
258,975 |
|
|
Tubular Technology and Services
|
|
|
226,233 |
|
|
|
226,607 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,875 |
|
|
|
9,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
945,643 |
|
|
|
803,818 |
|
Operating Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Products and Services
|
|
$ |
90,509 |
(a) |
|
$ |
18,776 |
(a) |
|
Drill Bits
|
|
|
70,542 |
|
|
|
58,443 |
(d) |
|
Tubular Technology and Services
|
|
|
20,884 |
(b) |
|
|
7,634 |
(e) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,117 |
) |
|
|
(16,754 |
)(e)(f) |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(38,146 |
)(c) |
|
|
(22,802 |
)(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Income
|
|
|
141,672 |
|
|
|
45,297 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes other charges of $2.0 million in 2004 related to
our manufacturing rationalization program, which includes lease
termination, severance and other exit costs in connection with
the downsizing of our Drilling Products Canadian operations.
Includes other charges of $24.9 million in 2003 for fixed
asset write-downs related to our manufacturing rationalization
program designed to take out of service redundant or idle assets
before their estimated useful lives pursuant to our initiative
to streamline manufacturing capacity and improve operating
efficiencies. The fixed asset write-downs were determined by use
of internal appraisals and evaluations to assess the net
realizable value upon disposal based on expected future cash
flows. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes other charges of $3.2 million for severance costs
related to the Tubular Technology and Services organizational
restructuring. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes other charges of $3.8 million for the write-off of
leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures related to the
relocation of our corporate offices in September 2004. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes transition costs of $3.9 million related to the
ReedHycalog acquisition in December 2002. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes other charges of $6.4 million, $0.4 million
in Tubular Technology and Services and $6.0 million in
Other, classified as Cost of Sales related to the write-down of
industrial inventory products to their estimated net realizable
values. The amount was determined by use of internal appraisals
and evaluations to assess the estimated net realizable value
upon disposition. |
|
(f) |
|
Includes other charges of $6.4 million related to the
write-down of two technology joint ventures. Included in this
amount is a goodwill impairment of $2.5 million, an
intangible asset write-off of $1.3 million and an
equity-method investment impairment of $2.6 million. |
|
(g) |
|
Includes other charges of $1.5 million for stock
compensation expense. In May 2003, two members of the Board of
Directors volunteered to step down to reduce the number of
common directors between us and our former parent Weatherford,
and vesting of their stock-based compensation was accelerated.
Also included is a $1.4 million credit reflecting the
actual 2003 settlement of a liability accrued as a charge in
2000. |
Consolidated revenues increased $141.8 million, or 18%,
while the worldwide rig count increased 10%. Consolidated
operating income increased $96.4 million, or 213%, and
operating income margins increased
15
from 5.6% to 15.0%. Operating income in 2004 and 2003 included
other charges and transition costs mentioned above totaling
$9.0 million and $41.7 million, respectively. Improved
margins reflect better pricing at all of our segments and
efficiencies obtained from the Drilling Products and
Services rationalization program and the Tubular
Technology and Services restructuring program. These
improved margins were partially offset by increased costs at the
Drill Bits segment.
Other operating expenses (sales and marketing, general and
administrative, and research and engineering) as a percentage of
revenues increased slightly from 24% to 25%. The increase in
other operating expenses resulted primarily from increased sales
and marketing expenses at the Companys Drill Bits segment
from international expansion costs and bad debt expense related
to foreign accounts receivable, higher incentive expenses and
increased costs related to compliance with Section 404 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Interest expense decreased $2.0 million due to lower debt
balances compared to the prior year. Equity income (loss) from
unconsolidated affiliates increased to income of
$1.6 million compared to a loss of $0.5 million in
2003. This improvement primarily reflects increased equity
income from our investment in Voest-Alpine partially offset by
increased development spending in our IntelliServ joint venture.
Additionally, 2003 includes losses from one of our technology
joint ventures that we wrote-off in December 2003. Other income,
net decreased from $11.1 million in 2003 to
$0.4 million in 2004. Fiscal 2003 includes gains related to
the sales of businesses of $3.4 million and favorably
renegotiating a liability to our former parent of
$6.6 million, partially offset by transition costs in 2003
of $2.9 million associated with the ReedHycalog
integration. Fiscal 2004 includes net gains from asset sales of
$4.5 million. Additionally, the Company incurred foreign
exchange losses of $3.7 million in 2004 versus losses of
$3.2 million in 2003 resulting primarily from the
U.S. dollar weakening in relation to the Euro and British
Pound.
The Companys tax rate in 2004 was 31.2% compared to 35.0%
in 2003. The rate decrease was primarily attributable to lower
expected foreign taxes due to the favorable renegotiation of a
tax holiday for certain foreign operations.
Segment Results
|
|
|
Drilling Products and Services |
Revenues for the Drilling Products and Services segment
increased $82.3 million, or 27%, and operating income
increased $71.7 million, or 382%, which includes other
charges mentioned above of $2.0 million and
$24.9 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The operating
income margin of 23% was up from 6%, including charges. During
2004, drill pipe footage sold increased 0.9 million feet,
or 13%, from 7.1 million feet to 8.0 million feet
sold. The average sales price per foot increased by 15%, which
primarily reflects a shift in product mix from lower margin,
small-diameter drilling products to higher margin,
large-diameter drilling products and price increases implemented
during the year that include surcharges due to higher steel
prices. Also contributing to the revenues increase are increased
sales of tool joints, heavyweight drill pipe and drill collars
and this segments results reflect the benefits from the
rationalization program implemented at the beginning of 2004,
which increased facility utilization and provided efficiency
improvements.
Revenues for the Drill Bits segment increased
$67.9 million, or 26%. This increase was primarily
attributable to increased revenues in U.S. and Canada reflecting
the 11% increase in the North American rig count, increased
revenues at certain international regions due to focused sales
and marketing efforts and increased revenues from the
Companys acquisition of Diamond Products International,
Inc. (DPI) in August 2004. This segment continues to have
success in its newly developed product lines, which include
ReedHycalogs rotary steerable bit technologies and
directional products, ReedHycalogs
TReXtm
diamond technology and the
TuffCuttertm,
TuffDutytm
and
Titantm
lines of roller-cone products. Operating income increased
$12.1 million, or 21%, which includes transition costs
mentioned above of $3.9 million in 2003, however operating
income margins decreased slightly from 23% to 22%. The decrease
in margins was primarily due to manufacturing inefficiencies
while shifting capacity between plants in connection with an
expansion of our Singapore operations, and incremental sales and
marketing expenses in connection with this segments
16
international expansions, increased bad debt expense related to
foreign accounts receivable and the acquisition of DPI.
|
|
|
Tubular Technology and Services |
Revenues for the Tubular Technology and Services segment
remained relatively flat. Revenues were up at this
segments TCA and XL Systems product lines but were offset
by declines at the other divisions within this segment.
Operating income increased $13.3 million, or 174%, which
includes other charges mentioned above of $3.2 million and
$0.4 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. Operating
income margin of 9% was up from 3%, including charges,
reflecting improved results at this segments TCA, XL
Systems and Premium product lines due to improved pricing,
strong mill activity and the benefit of cost cutting initiatives
implemented since last year related to this segments
restructuring program.
Our Other segment included our industrial drill pipe operations
and our construction casing and water well operations. We exited
the industrial drill pipe business in the second quarter of 2003
and the construction casing and water well business with the
sale of Star in the first quarter of 2003.
In 2003, we moved our joint ventures relating to POS-GRIP
technology from our Tubular Technology and Services segment to
this segment. Prior periods have been restated to reflect this
change. During the first quarter of 2004, we sold the rights to
the POS-GRIP technology for jack-up exploration applications and
have granted our partner an option to purchase our rights to
POS-GRIP technology for subsea applications.
Our Other segment revenues decreased $8.1 million, or 81%,
and operating loss decreased $14.6 million, which includes
other charges mentioned above of $12.4 million in 2003. As
of the end 2004, the remaining inventory related to the
industrial drill pipe operations had been sold.
Corporate expenses for 2004 were $38.1 million compared to
$22.8 million, which includes other charges mentioned above
of $3.8 million and $0.1 million in 2004 and 2003,
respectively. As a percentage of revenues, Corporate expenses
increased from 3% to 4%. The increase was primarily due to
higher incentive expenses, costs related to the implementation
of Sarbanes-Oxley and depreciation of the Companys new ERP
system.
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared to the Year
Ended December 31, 2002 |
The following table summarizes the results of the Company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Products and Services
|
|
$ |
308,297 |
|
|
$ |
317,280 |
|
|
Drill Bits
|
|
|
258,975 |
|
|
|
5,270 |
|
|
Tubular Technology and Services
|
|
|
226,607 |
|
|
|
258,458 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
9,939 |
|
|
|
28,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues
|
|
|
803,818 |
|
|
|
609,390 |
|
Operating Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Products and Services
|
|
|
18,776 |
(a) |
|
|
58,029 |
(f) |
|
Drill Bits
|
|
|
58,443 |
(b) |
|
|
796 |
|
|
Tubular Technology and Services
|
|
|
7,634 |
(c) |
|
|
12,824 |
(f) |
|
Other
|
|
|
(16,754 |
)(c)(d) |
|
|
(1,124 |
) |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(22,802 |
)(e) |
|
|
(23,530 |
)(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Income
|
|
|
45,297 |
|
|
|
46,995 |
|
17
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes other charges of $24.9 million in 2003 for fixed
asset write-downs related to our manufacturing rationalization
program designed to take out of service redundant or idle assets
before their estimated useful lives pursuant to our initiative
to streamline manufacturing capacity and improve operating
efficiencies. The fixed asset write-downs were determined by use
of internal appraisals and evaluations to assess the net
realizable value upon disposal based on expected future cash
flows. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes transition costs of $3.9 million related to the
ReedHycalog acquisition in December 2002. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes other charges of $6.4 million, $0.4 million
in Tubular Technology and Services and $6.0 million in
Other, classified as Cost of Sales related to the write-down of
industrial inventory drilling products to their estimated net
realizable values. The amount was determined by use of internal
appraisals and evaluations to assess the estimated net
realizable value upon disposition. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes other charges of $6.4 million related to the
write-down of two technology joint ventures. Included in this
amount is a goodwill impairment of $2.5 million, an
intangible asset write-off of $1.3 million and an
equity-method investment impairment of $2.6 million. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes other charges of $1.5 million for stock
compensation expense. In May 2003, two members of the Board of
Directors volunteered to step down to reduce the number of
common directors between us and our former parent Weatherford,
and vesting of their stock-based compensation was accelerated.
Also included is a $1.4 million credit reflecting the
actual 2003 settlement of a liability accrued as a charge in
2000. |
|
(f) |
|
Includes other charges of $2.6 million, $2.4 million
in Drilling Products and Services and $0.2 million in
Tubular Technology and Services, related to fixed asset
write-downs for idle assets that were taken out of service
pursuant to our ongoing automation and efficiency initiatives
and were classified as held for sale. The amount was determined
by use of internal appraisals and evaluations to assess the net
realizable value upon disposal based on expected future cash
flows. |
|
(g) |
|
Includes other charges of $4.5 million related to an
executive terminated in June 2002. |
Consolidated revenues increased $194.4 million, or 32%, and
consolidated operating income decreased $1.7 million, or
4%. Operating income margins decreased from 7.7% to 5.6%.
Operating income in 2003 and 2002 included other charges and
transition costs mentioned above totaling $41.7 million and
$7.1 million, respectively. The increases, excluding other
charges, were due to the acquisition of ReedHycalog in December
2002.
Other operating expense (sales and marketing, general and
administrative, and research and engineering) as a percentage of
revenue increased from 14% to 24%. This increase relates
primarily to our Drill Bits segment, which has a significant
worldwide sales and marketing infrastructure and an extensive
research and engineering program.
Our interest expense increased $16.8 million due to new
debt related to the ReedHycalog acquisition in December 2002. In
connection with the acquisition, we issued $175 million
9% Senior Notes Due 2009 and entered into a new Senior
Credit Facility, which includes a $50 million term loan.
See Liquidity and Capital Resources for further
discussion of the Senior Credit Facility. Equity income (loss)
from unconsolidated affiliates decreased to a loss of
$0.5 million in 2003 from income of $5.3 million in
2002. This decrease was primarily due to a $4.4 million
decrease in equity income contributed by our investment in
Voest-Alpine due to decreased activity. The remaining decrease
relates to our equity-method investments in G-PEX and
IntelliServ that had increased costs from continued development
of their products in 2003, coupled with equity income in 2002
related to Jiangsu Shuguang Grant Prideco Tubular Limited
(JSG) before our majority interest purchase in March 2002.
Other income (expense), net increased from expense of
$1.0 million to income of $11.2 million in 2003. This
increase relates to a $6.6 million gain from favorably
renegotiating a liability to our former parent, a gain on the
sale of businesses of $3.4 million, along with favorable
foreign exchange fluctuation in 2003. These increases were
partially offset by transition costs in 2003 of
$2.9 million associated with the ReedHycalog integration.
18
|
|
|
Drilling Products and Services |
Our Drilling Products and Services segment revenues decreased
$9.0 million, or 3%, and operating income decreased
$39.3 million, or 68%, which includes other charges
mentioned above of $24.9 million and $2.4 million in
2003 and 2002, respectively. Operating income margin of 6% was
down from 18% in 2002, including charges. During 2003, drill
pipe footage sold increased 0.7 million feet, from
6.4 million feet sold to 7.1 million feet sold, and
average sales price per foot decreased by 10%. The decrease in
price reflects a shift in product mix from higher margin,
large-diameter drilling products to lower margin, small-diameter
drilling products. Also contributing to the decrease in revenues
are decreased sales of tool joints and heavyweight drill pipe.
These decreases are partially offset by incremental revenues for
2003 related to our majority-interest purchase of JSG in March
2002.
On December 20, 2002, we acquired ReedHycalog, which
comprises our Drill Bits segment. Our Drill Bits segment
reported revenues of $259.0 million compared to
$5.3 million. Operating income was $58.4 million
compared to $0.8 million and operating income margins were
23% compared to 15%, which includes transition costs mentioned
above. ReedHycalogs results have strengthened throughout
the year reflecting worldwide sales increases and successful
market penetration of this segments new TReX fixed-cutter bit.
|
|
|
Tubular Technology and Services |
Our Tubular Technology and Services segment revenues decreased
$31.9 million, or 12%, and operating income decreased
$5.2 million, or 40%, which includes other charges
mentioned above of $0.4 million and $0.2 million in
2003 and 2002, respectively. Operating income margin of 3% was
down from 5%, including charges. These decreases reflect the
impact of exiting the tubing product lines in the first quarter
of 2003, sales of our Rotator subsidiary in September 2003 and
our Petro-Drive product line in December 2003, as well as
decreased premium threading and tubular processing activities.
The 2003 results also included incremental revenues and
operating income related to our Grey-Mak business that was
acquired in September 2002.
Our Other segment revenues decreased $18.4 million, or 65%,
and operating loss increased $15.6 million, which includes
other charges mentioned above of $12.4 million in 2003.
This segment included our industrial drill pipe operations and
our construction casing and water well operations. We exited the
industrial drill pipe business in the second quarter of 2003 and
the construction casing and water well business with the sale of
Star in the first quarter of 2003.
In 2003, we moved our joint ventures relating to POS-GRIP
technology from our Tubular Technology and Services segment to
this segment. Prior periods have been restated to reflect this
change.
Corporate expenses were $22.8 million compared to
$23.5 million, which includes other charges mentioned above
of $0.1 million and $4.5 million in 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Excluding these charges, Corporate expenses
increased primarily due to higher incentive and business
development costs in 2003. As a percentage of revenues,
Corporate expenses remained relatively flat.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity depends upon our cash flow from operations, the
level of availability under our senior credit facility and our
ability to raise capital from third parties. During 2004, we
repaid all of the outstanding borrowings under our senior credit
facility and increased our borrowing base capacity. As a result
of these improvements, we have significantly improved our
liquidity position. We believe that we are positioned to take
19
advantage of upturns in the market for our products and
services, take advantage of strategic opportunities as they
become available and maintain sufficient company liquidity in
the event of a downturn.
At December 31, 2004, we had cash of $47.6 million,
working capital of $401.3 million, and unused borrowing
availability of $168.0 million under our senior credit
facility, compared to cash of $19.2 million, working
capital of $344.6 million and unused borrowing availability
under our senior credit facility of $122.3 million at
December 31, 2003.
The following table summarizes our cash flows provided by
operating activities, net cash used in investing activities, and
net cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the
periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
$ |
113,170 |
|
|
$ |
82,938 |
|
|
$ |
118,686 |
|
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(45,381 |
) |
|
|
(23,804 |
) |
|
|
(313,836 |
) |
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Financing Activities
|
|
|
(39,890 |
) |
|
|
(62,412 |
) |
|
|
206,040 |
|
Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased by
$30.2 million in 2004 compared to 2003. Cash flow before
changes in operating assets and liabilities increased by
$65.8 million, which was offset by a use of cash of
$35.6 million related to a net increase in operating
assets. This use of cash was primarily due to increased
inventories reflecting the increased drilling activity and
increased accrued liabilities primarily related to incentive
expenses, partially offset by an improvement in days sales
outstanding of 16 days.
Net cash flow provided by operating activities decreased by
$35.7 million in 2003 compared to 2002. Cash flow before
changes in operating assets and liabilities increased by
$24.5 million, which was offset by a use of cash of
$60.2 million related to net increases in operating assets
and liabilities (primarily accounts receivable and inventory).
These changes reflect the increased oil and gas drilling
activity in 2003 when compared to 2002.
Net cash used in investing activities increased by
$21.6 million in 2004 compared to 2003. This increase was
primarily attributable to higher cash payments for acquisitions
of businesses of $25.6 million, which were partially offset
by increased proceeds from the sales of businesses (including
the discontinued operations of Texas Arai) and fixed assets of
$0.8 million. Cash payments for business acquisitions, net
of cash acquired, in 2004 include $17.3 million for the
assets of Novatek and $16.5 million for DPI, while the
activity in 2003 includes $3.1 million of post-closing
acquisition payments related to both ReedHycalog and POS and
$5.2 million for acquiring an additional 35% interest in
Rotator. Proceeds from the sale of businesses in 2004 include
$19.9 million for Texas Arai, $1.3 million for POS and
$0.8 million for a post-closing receipt related to Rotator,
while the activity in 2003 includes $13.1 million for the
sale of Rotator, $6.3 million for the sale of our
Petro-Drive operations and $11.0 million for the sale of
Star.
Net cash used in investing activities decreased by
$290.0 million in 2003 compared to 2002 due primarily to
decreased business acquisitions during 2003, coupled with
proceeds from the sale of businesses of $30.4 million and a
decrease in capital expenditures for property, plant and
equipment of $4.4 million.
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment totaled
$37.9 million and $41.4 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. We currently
expect to expend approximately $40.0 million for capital
expenditures for property, plant and equipment during 2005. This
includes capital expenditures related to our capital improvement
program to reduce production costs and improve efficiencies and
the existing equipment base, and excludes any capital spending
related to our IntelliServ joint venture.
20
Net cash used in financing activities decreased by
$22.5 million in 2004 compared to 2003. This change
primarily reflects increased proceeds from stock options
exercised in 2004 of $25.2 million partially offset by
increased repayments on our debt. As of December 31, 2004,
there were no borrowings outstanding under the revolver or term
loan portions of our senior credit facility.
Net cash provided by financing activities decreased by
$268.5 million in 2003 compared to 2002. In 2002, we
received net proceeds of $170.4 million from the issuance
of $175 million 9% Senior Notes Due 2009, coupled with
net borrowings of $36.8 million. In 2003, net repayments on
total debt were $60.6 million.
|
|
|
Senior Credit Facility and Other Long-Term Debt |
Our debt balances are primarily comprised of:
(1) borrowings under our senior credit facility,
(2) 9% Senior Notes due 2009 and
(3) 95/8% Senior
Notes due 2007. We estimate our required principal and interest
payments for outstanding debt to be approximately
$39.3 million for 2005.
In connection with the ReedHycalog acquisition in December 2002,
we entered into a four-year $240 million senior secured
credit facility (Senior Credit Facility) with a syndicate of
U.S. and foreign banks maturing on December 18, 2006. The
Senior Credit Facility was comprised of a $50 million term
loan and a $190 million revolving credit facility, which
includes up to $20 million for letter of credits. As of
December 31, 2004, we did not have any outstanding
borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility and
$7.7 million of revolver availability had been reserved to
support outstanding letters of credit. Once the term loan was
repaid, it no longer represented availability under the Senior
Credit Facility.
The U.S. revolving facility is guaranteed by Grant Prideco
and all domestic subsidiaries and is secured by substantially
all of our U.S. assets, including U.S. inventories,
equipment, receivables, owned real property and 65% of the stock
of certain foreign subsidiaries. The Canadian credit facility is
guaranteed by Grant Prideco and all U.S. subsidiaries and
is secured by substantially all of our U.S. assets and
certain of our Canadian inventories, equipment, receivables,
owned real property and 65% of the stock of certain foreign
subsidiaries.
Availability under the revolving credit facility, which was
$168.0 million as of December 31, 2004, is based on
the collateral value of the inventories and receivables securing
the credit facility. Amounts outstanding under the credit
facilities accrue interest at a variable rate based on either
the U.S. prime rate (plus 0.75% to 1.75% depending on
our leverage ratio) or LIBOR (plus 1.75% to 2.75% depending
on our leverage ratio) for the U.S. denominated advances or
a variable rate based on the Canadian prime rate
(plus 0.75%) or the applicable rate for Canadian bankers
acceptances, for Canadian denominated advances. Interest on
outstanding borrowings is payable monthly or, with respect to
LIBOR borrowings, either quarterly or at the end of the
applicable LIBOR period. The U.S. revolving credit facility
also provides us with availability for letters of credit. We are
required to comply with various affirmative and negative
covenants which will limit our ability to incur new debt, make
certain investments and acquisitions, sell assets, grant liens,
repurchase equity, repurchase debt and take other actions. We
are subject to financial covenants that require us to limit our
capital expenditures and, under certain circumstances, require
us to maintain a certain minimum fixed charge coverage ratio.
In December 2002, we issued $175.0 million principal amount
of 9% Senior Notes Due 2009. Net proceeds from the issuance
of $170.4 million were used, along with certain other
funds, to fund the cash portion of the ReedHycalog acquisition.
Interest is payable June 15 and December 15 of each year. After
December 15, 2006, we may redeem all or part of the
9% Senior Notes at any time at a price of 100% of their
principal amount plus an applicable premium (starting at 4%) and
accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The
9% Senior Notes are guaranteed by all of our domestic
subsidiaries. The indenture
21
governing the 9% Senior Notes contains various covenants
customary in such instruments, including restrictions to incur
new debt, pay dividends, sell assets, grant liens and other
related items.
|
|
|
95/8% Senior
Notes Due 2007 |
In December 2000, we issued $200.0 million principal amount
of
95/8% Senior
Notes Due 2007. The
95/8% Senior
Notes were issued at a discount to yield an effective interest
rate of
93/4%.
Net proceeds from the issuance of $193.3 million were
utilized to repay a $100.0 million subordinated note to
Weatherford International, Inc. and to repay outstanding
borrowings under our then-existing revolving credit facility of
$80.3 million. Interest is payable June 1 and
December 1 of each year. We may redeem all or part of the
95/8% Senior
Notes at any time at a price of 100% of their principal amount
plus an applicable premium and accrued and unpaid interest to
the redemption date. The
95/8% Senior
Notes are guaranteed by all of our domestic subsidiaries. The
indenture governing the
95/8% Senior
Notes contains various covenants customary in such instruments,
including restrictions to incur new debt, pay dividends, sell
assets, grant liens and other related items.
In the event there is a payment default under the Senior Credit
Facility, the 9% and
95/8% Senior
Notes could come due. As of December 31, 2004, we were in
compliance with the various covenants under the Senior Credit
Facility and the 9% and
95/8% Senior
Notes agreements.
We estimate our required principal and interest payments for our
outstanding debt to be approximately $39.3 million for 2005
and capital expenditures for 2005 to be approximately
$40.0 million in the aggregate. We currently expect to
satisfy all required capital expenditures and debt service
requirements during 2005 from operating cash flows, existing
cash balances and the revolver portion of our Senior Credit
Facility.
Based on our current projected capital expenditures and required
principal and interest payments, our operating cash flows,
existing cash balances and estimated availability under the
revolver portion of the Senior Credit Facility, we believe we
can satisfy all of our expected commitments during the next
12 months and will have sufficient liquidity in the event
of a prolonged market downturn to not only maintain our existing
operations but to take advantage of strategic opportunities that
may present themselves during any such period. Acquisitions and
expansions will be financed from cash flow from operations,
borrowings under the revolver portion of our Senior Credit
Facility, or through a combination of the issuance of additional
equity and debt financing, as appropriate. Any future financing
will be arranged to meet our requirements, with the timing,
amount, and form of issue dependent on the prevailing market and
general economic conditions.
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and
commercial commitments at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After | |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
2-4 Years | |
|
5-6 Years | |
|
6 Years | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Contractual Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
$ |
381,954 |
|
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
|
$ |
201,212 |
|
|
$ |
175,382 |
|
|
$ |
1,179 |
|
Operating Leases
|
|
|
47,453 |
|
|
|
9,992 |
|
|
|
19,095 |
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
13,544 |
|
Purchase Obligation(a)
|
|
|
6,618 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
4,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Contractual Obligations
|
|
$ |
436,025 |
|
|
$ |
16,735 |
|
|
$ |
224,363 |
|
|
$ |
180,204 |
|
|
$ |
14,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
Total | |
|
1 Year | |
|
2-4 Years | |
|
5-6 Years |
|
6 Years |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Commercial Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letters of Credit
|
|
$ |
9,484 |
|
|
$ |
6,209 |
|
|
$ |
3,275 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
22
|
|
|
(a) |
|
We have entered into a supply agreement with Voest-Alpine which
provides that we purchase a minimum quantity of tubulars per
year through July 31, 2007. Although we are not
contractually obligated to purchase an annual minimum
commitment, the contract does include a penalty for every metric
ton that a two-year average of purchases fall below the annual
purchase minimum. The maximum annual penalty due under the
contract would be approximately 1.9 million Euros annually.
The amounts in the table reflect the amount of this contractual
penalty assuming we made no purchases from Voest-Alpine and were
converted from Euros to U.S. dollars using the average 2004
foreign currency exchange rate. |
Related-Party Transactions
Until April 14, 2000, we were a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Weatherford. We were spun off from Weatherford on April 14,
2000, through a distribution by Weatherford to its stockholders
of all of our common stock. Weatherford no longer owns any
interest in our Company. Prior to our 2003 Annual Meeting held
in May 2003, we had seven Directors, five of which also served
on the Board of Weatherford. Currently, we now have nine
Directors, of which only three serve on Weatherfords Board.
In connection with the spinoff, we entered into a preferred
supplier agreement with Weatherford in which Weatherford agreed
to purchase at least 70% of its requirements of drill stem
products from us, subject to certain exceptions. In return, we
agreed to sell those products at prices not greater than that at
which we sell to similarly situated customers, and we provided
Weatherford a $30.0 million credit towards the purchase of
those products. During 2003, we extended the term of this
contract by two years and reduced the unused preferred supplier
credit balance by $6.6 million. The effect of this
reduction in the supplier credit was a reduction in the accrued
liability as a credit to other income. Such adjustment is
reflected in Other Income (Expense), Net in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 2003. At December 31, 2004, the remaining
credit balance was $4.1 million. Weatherford purchased
approximately $25.1 million of drill stem products from us
during 2004. Weatherford also purchased API tubing and accessory
threading services from us aggregating $3.9 million during
2004.
Our Drill Bits segment sells drill bits worldwide to oil and gas
operators, including Newfield Exploration Company (Newfield). In
addition, a division of our Tubular Technology and Services
segment also sells accessories directly to Newfield. Two of our
directors, Mr. Trice and Mr. Hendrix, are directors of
Newfield and Mr. Trice is Newfields Chairman,
President and Chief Executive Officer. During 2004, Newfield
purchased approximately $2.1 million of products from us.
We believe that the prices we charge are on terms comparable to
those that would be available to unaffiliated third parties.
During 2004, our supply agreement with Voest-Alpine was amended.
The amended agreement provided for a reduced minimum quantity
commitment per year through July 31, 2007, effective
April 1, 2004. The amendment also provides for a surcharge
provision under which actual costs of key raw materials in the
green pipe production process will be indexed to the April 2003
base cost and surcharges per ton assessed accordingly for the
difference. These surcharges are phased in and did not
significantly impact 2004, however, they will be in place for
2005 forward. The contract includes a penalty for every metric
ton that a two-year average of purchases fall below the annual
purchase minimum. During 2004, we met our minimum purchase
requirements and we currently believe we will meet our
contractual commitments for 2005 without incurring unnecessary
penalties or material unnecessary inventory positions.
Off-Balance Sheet Financing
We do not have any off-balance sheet hedging, financing
arrangements or contracts except those associated with our
investments in two companies that are not consolidated in our
financial statements: Voest-Alpine and IntelliServ. These
investments are accounted for under the equity-method of
accounting. The assets and liabilities of Voest-Alpine are
summarized in Note 7. Additionally, Voest-Alpine has
entered into forward contracts to cover its currency risk
related to accounts receivables and accounts payables, has
entered into interest rate swap agreements to reduce its
exposure to changes in floating interest rate payments of its
long-term bonds, and has also entered into an agreement with a
bank to sell a significant portion of its
23
accounts receivable. IntelliServ is our technology joint venture
that is currently developing technology for intelligent drill
pipe that permits real-time transfer of data through the drill
string. IntelliServ does not have any debt, other than trade
payables relating primarily to research and development expenses.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued the revised SFAS No. 123,
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), which
addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in
which a company obtains employee services in exchange for
(a) equity instruments of the company or
(b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the
companys equity instruments or that may be settled by the
issuance of such equity instruments. This statement eliminates
the ability to account for employee share-based payment
transactions using APB No. 25 and requires instead that
such transactions be accounted for using the grant-date fair
value based method. This statement will be effective as of the
beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that
begins after June 15, 2005 (July 1, 2005 for the
Company). Early adoption of SFAS 123R is encouraged. This
Statement applies to all awards granted or modified after the
Statements effective date. In addition, compensation cost
for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that
remain outstanding on the Statements effective date shall
be recognized on or after the effective date, as the related
services are rendered, based on the awards grant-date fair
value as previously calculated for the pro-forma disclosure
under SFAS 123.
We expect that upon the adoption of SFAS 123R, we will
apply the modified prospective application transition method, as
permitted by the Statement. Under such transition method, upon
the adoption of SFAS 123R, our financial statements for
periods prior to the effective date of the Statement will not be
restated. The impact of this Statement on our financial
statements or its results of operations in 2005 and beyond will
depend upon various factors, among them our future compensation
strategy. We expect that the effect of applying this Statement
on our results of operations in 2005 as it relates to existing
option plans would not be materially different from the
SFAS 123 pro forma effect previously reported.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151
Inventory Costs An Amendment of ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151
clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs and spoilage should be expensed as
incurred and not included in overhead. Further, SFAS 151
requires that allocation of fixed and production facilities
overheads to conversion costs should be based on normal capacity
of the production facilities. The provisions in SFAS 151
are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. We do not believe that the
adoption of SFAS 151 will have a significant effect on our
financial statements.
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act)
enacted on October 22, 2004 provides for a temporary 85%
dividends received deduction on certain foreign earnings
repatriated during a one-year period. The deduction would result
in an approximate 5.25% federal tax rate on the repatriated
foreign earnings. To qualify for the deduction, certain criteria
in the Act must be satisfied. We are in the process of
evaluating whether we will repatriate foreign earnings under the
repatriation provisions of the Act and if so, the amount that
will be repatriated. Through December 31, 2004, we have not
provided deferred taxes on certain foreign earnings because such
earnings were intended to be indefinitely reinvested outside the
United States. Whether we will take advantage of this provision
depends on a number of factors including reviewing future
Congressional guidance before a decision can be made. Until that
time, we will make no change in our current intention to
indefinitely reinvest certain earnings of our foreign
subsidiaries. If we were to repatriate these earnings, a
one-time tax benefit to our Consolidated Statements of
Operations of up to approximately $2.1 million could occur.
In December 2003, the FASB revised SFAS No. 132,
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Post-Retirement Benefits. The revised Statement requires
new disclosures in addition to those required by the original
Statement about the assets, obligations, cash flows and net
periodic benefit costs of defined benefit pension plans and
other defined benefit post-retirement plans. As revised,
SFAS No. 132R is effective for financial statements
with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003. The
interim-period disclosures required by this Statement were
effective for interim periods beginning after December 15,
2003. However,
24
disclosure of the estimated future benefit payments was
effective for fiscal years ending after June 14, 2004. We
adopted SFAS 132R during 2004. The adoption of
SFAS 132R did not have any impact on our results of
operations or financial position. See Note 13 for
disclosures regarding our defined benefit pension plans.
In January 2003, the FASB Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN No. 46) was issued. FIN No. 46
clarifies the application of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements, to variable interest entities (VIEs),
which are certain entities in which equity investors do not have
the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do
not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its
activities without additional subordinated support from other
parties. The Interpretation is intended to achieve more
consistent application of consolidation policies to VIEs
and, thus, to improve comparability between enterprises engaged
in similar activities even if some of those activities are
conducted through VIEs. FIN No. 46 requires the
entity, which absorbs a majority of the variable income or loss
of a VIE be considered the primary beneficiary and requires
consolidation of the VIE. The Interpretation was effective
immediately for VIEs created after January 31, 2003,
and to VIEs in which we obtain an interest after that
date. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to
FIN No. 46, (FIN No. 46R), to clarify some
of the provisions of FIN No. 46 and to exempt certain
entities from its requirements. Under the new guidance, special
effective date provisions apply to enterprises that have fully
or partially applied FIN No. 46 prior to issuance of
this revised interpretation. Otherwise, application of
FIN No. 46R was required in financial statements of
public entities that have interests in structures that are
commonly referred to as special-purpose entities for periods
ending after December 15, 2003. Application by public
entities, other than small business issuers, for all other types
of VIEs was required in financial statements for periods
ending after March 15, 2004. We are not a primary
beneficiary of a VIE nor do we hold any significant interests or
involvement in a VIE. The adoption of this Interpretation did
not have a material effect on our results of operations or
financial position.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our significant accounting policies are fully described in
Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain of our accounting
policies require the application of significant judgment by
management in selecting the appropriate assumptions for
calculating financial estimates. By their nature, these
judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty.
These judgments are based on our historical experience, terms of
existing contracts, our observance of trends in the industry,
information provided by our customers and information available
from other outside sources, as appropriate. Actual results may
differ from these judgments and assumptions.
We recognize revenues when the earnings process is complete and
collectibility is reasonably assured. With respect to the
Drilling Products and Services and Tubular Technology and
Services segments, this includes satisfying the following
criteria: the arrangement with the customer is evident; the
sales price is fixed or determinable; the manufacturing process
is complete (including completion of all proper inspections);
title and risk of loss have passed to the customer and all
delivery obligations have been met. If requested in writing by
the customer; delivery may be satisfied through delivery to our
customer storage location or to a third-party storage facility.
With respect to our Drill Bits segment, revenue is recognized
when the customer runs the drill bit. Customer advances or
deposits are deferred and recognized as revenue when we have
completed all of our performance obligations related to the
sale. We also recognize revenues as services are performed.
Additionally, we recognize revenues associated with rebillable
shipping costs.
|
|
|
Deferred Revenues and Charges |
For sales transactions where title and risk of loss has
transferred to the customer but the supporting documentation
does not meet all of the criteria for revenue recognition prior
to the products being in the physical possession of the
customer, recognition of the revenues and related inventory
costs from these transactions are required to be deferred until
the customer takes physical possession. At December 31,
2004, we had deferred revenues and charges related to such
transactions of $21.4 million and $17.2 million,
25
respectively. The deferred charges represent customer-owned
finished goods inventory on deferred sales transactions for
which legal title transfer has occurred, but the product is not
yet in the customers physical possession. See Note 19
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
information on the restatement of the first three quarters of
2004. The impact of deferred revenues and charges on prior
years financial statements was not material.
Inventory costs are stated at the lower of cost or market using
the first-in, first-out method. We value our inventories
primarily using standard costs, which approximate actual costs,
that include raw materials, direct labor, and manufacturing
overhead allocations. We performs obsolescence reviews on our
slow-moving and excess inventories and establish reserves based
on current assessments of factors such as age of inventory,
technological obsolescence, future product demands, market
conditions and related management initiatives. If such factors
are different than those projected by management, additional
inventory reserves may be required.
The cost of business acquisitions is allocated to the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values at the date of acquisition using third-party appraisals
and management estimates. Managements estimates of fair
value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but
which are inherently uncertain. In addition, estimated
liabilities to exit activities of an acquired operation or an
existing operation, including the exiting of contractual
obligations and the termination of employees, are subject to
change as management continues its assessment of operations and
finalizes its integration and exit plans.
A review for impairment of long-lived assets is performed
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of long-lived assets (group) may not be
recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is
measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset
group to expected undiscounted future net cash flows to be
generated by the asset group. If such asset group is considered
to be impaired, the impairment loss to be recognized is measured
by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group
exceeds fair value based on expected discounted future cash
flows. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the
carrying amount or fair value, less selling costs. In 2004, we
recorded fixed asset impairments of $3.8 million related to
the write-off of leasehold improvements and furniture and
fixtures resulting from the relocation of our Corporate office
in September 2004. While we believe no other impairment existed
at December 31, 2004 under accounting standards applicable
at that date, different conditions or assumptions, or changes in
cash flows or profitability, if significantly negative or
unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on the outcome
of our impairment evaluation and our financial condition or
future results of operations.
|
|
|
Goodwill and Intangible Assets |
Goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite useful lives
are subject to at least an annual impairment test and more
frequently if circumstances indicate their value may not be
recoverable. Goodwill is tested for impairment using a two-step
process that begins with an estimation of the fair value of each
of our reporting units compared with its carrying value. If the
carrying amount exceeds the fair value of a reporting unit, a
second step test is completed comparing the implied fair value
of the reporting units goodwill to its carrying value to
measure the amount of impairment. Intangible assets that are not
amortized will be tested for impairment at least annually by
comparing the fair values of those assets to their carrying
values. Other identifiable intangible assets that are subject to
amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
years expected to be benefited, ranging from 1.5 to
20 years. These amortizable intangible assets are reviewed
for impairment if circumstances indicate their value may not be
recoverable based on a comparison of fair value to carrying
value. Based on our annual goodwill impairment test as of
October 1, 2004, we do not believe any of our goodwill is
impaired as of December 31, 2004. While we believe no
impairment existed at December 31, 2004 under accounting
standards applicable at that date, different conditions or
assumptions, or
26
changes in cash flows or profitability, if significantly
negative or unfavorable, could have a material adverse effect on
the outcome of our impairment evaluation and our financial
condition or future results of operations.
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets |
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax
assets when it is more likely than not that some portion or all
of the deferred tax assets will expire before realization of the
benefit or that future deductibility is not probable. The
ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets depends on the
ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate
character in the future. This requires us to use estimates and
make assumptions regarding significant future events such as the
taxable profitability of entities operating in the various
taxing jurisdictions.
We have contingent liabilities and future claims for which we
have made estimates of the amount of the actual costs of these
liabilities or claims. These liabilities and claims sometimes
involve threatened or actual litigation where damages have been
quantified and we have made an assessment of our exposure and
recorded a provision to cover an expected loss based on our
experience in these matters and, when appropriate, the advice of
outside counsel or other outside experts. Upon the ultimate
resolution of these uncertainties, our future reported financial
results will be impacted by the difference between our estimates
and the actual amounts paid to settle a liability. Examples of
areas where we have made important estimates of future
liabilities primarily include litigation, warranty claims,
environmental liabilities and contract claims. While management
believes the recorded liabilities are adequate, inherent
limitations in the estimation process may cause future actual
losses to exceed expected losses.
The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with
uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations in a
multitude of jurisdictions. We recognize potential liabilities
and record tax liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in
the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of
whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due.
We adjust these reserves in light of changing facts and
circumstances; however, due to the complexity of some of these
uncertainties, the ultimate resolution may result in a payment
that is different from our current estimate of the tax
liabilities. If our estimate of tax liabilities proves to be
less than the ultimate assessment, an additional charge to
expense would result. If payment of these amounts ultimately
proves to be less than the recorded amounts, the reversal of the
liabilities may result in income tax benefits being recognized
in the period when we determine the liabilities are no longer
necessary. Substantially all of these potential tax liabilities
are recorded in Other Long-Term Liabilities on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as payment is not expected within
one year.
The plan obligations and related assets of defined benefit
pension plans are presented in Note 13 of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. Plan assets, which consist
primarily of marketable equity and debt instruments, are valued
using market quotations as of the period end. Plan obligations
and the annual pension expense are determined by independent
actuaries and through the use of a number of assumptions. Key
assumptions in measuring the plan obligations include the
discount rate and the estimated future return on plan assets. In
determining the discount rate, the Company utilizes the yield on
high-quality, fixed-income investments currently available with
maturities corresponding to the anticipated timing of the
benefit payments. Asset returns are based upon the anticipated
average rate of earnings expected on the invested funds of the
plans.
Forward-Looking Statements and Exposures -
In light of the SECs Regulation FD, we have elected
to provide in this report various forward-looking statements and
operational details. We have done so to assure full market
disclosure of information that we generally make available to
our investors and securities analysts. We expect to provide
updates to this information on a regular basis in our periodic
and current reports filed with the SEC. We have also made our
27
investor conference calls open to all investors and encourage
all investors to listen in on these calls. We will publicly
announce the call-in information in a press release before such
calls. We are providing this information to assist our
stockholders in better understanding our business. These
expectations reflect only our current view on these matters as
of the date of this report and are subject to change based on
changes of facts and circumstances. There can be no assurance
that these expectations will be met and our actual results will
likely vary (up or down) from those currently projected. These
estimates speak only of our expectations as of the date of this
report and we make no undertaking to update this information.
The absence of an update should not be considered as an
affirmation of our current expectations or that facts have not
changed during the quarter that would impact our expectations.
|
|
|
Risk Factors and Exposures |
The businesses in which we operate are subject to various risks
and uncertainties that could have adverse consequences on our
results of operations and financial condition and that could
cause actual results to be materially different from projected
results contained in the forward-looking statements in this
report and in our other disclosures. Investors should carefully
consider these risks and uncertainties when evaluating our
company and the forward-looking statements that we make. These
risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
|
|
A decline in domestic and worldwide oil and gas drilling
activity would adversely affect our results of
operations. |
Our forward-looking statements and projections of future results
assume stable to moderately increasing demand for our products
and services. However, our businesses are materially dependent
on the level of oil and gas drilling activity in North America
and worldwide, which in turn depends on the level of capital
spending by major, independent and state-owned exploration and
production companies. This capital spending is driven by current
prices for oil and gas and the perceived stability and
sustainability of those prices. Oil and gas prices have been
subject to significant fluctuation in recent years in response
to changes in the supply and demand for oil and gas, market
uncertainty, world events, governmental actions, and a variety
of additional factors that are beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the level of North American and worldwide oil and gas
exploration and production activity; |
|
|
|
worldwide economic conditions, particularly economic conditions
in North America; |
|
|
|
oil and gas production costs; |
|
|
|
the expected costs of developing new reserves; |
|
|
|
national government political requirements and the policies of
the OPEC; |
|
|
|
the price and availability of alternative fuels; |
|
|
|
environmental regulation; and |
|
|
|
tax policies. |
Decreased demand for our products results not only from periods
of lower drilling activity, but also from the resulting build up
of customer inventory of drill pipe associated with idle rigs,
which can be used on active rigs in lieu of new purchases. The
time period during which drill pipe inventory is used is a
function of the number of rigs actively drilling and the
expected level of drilling activity. A decrease in the number of
rigs actively drilling results in a large amount of unused drill
pipe on idle rigs and a decrease in demand for new drill pipe.
28
|
|
|
An economic downturn could adversely affect demand for our
products and services and our results of operations. |
The U.S. and worldwide economies have been very volatile, and
their future directions are uncertain. If North American or
international economies decline unexpectedly, our results of
operations and financial condition could be materially adversely
affected.
|
|
|
Increases in the prices of our raw materials could affect
our results of operations. |
We use large amounts of steel tubulars and bars in the
manufacture of our products. The price of these raw materials
has a significant impact on our cost of producing products. If
we are unable to pass future raw material price increases on to
our customers, our margins and results of operations could be
adversely affected.
Steel prices have increased significantly since the end of 2003,
caused primarily by significant increases in the prices paid by
our suppliers for scrap and coke utilized in their operations.
In addition, rising steel costs also have the potential to delay
increases in demand for our drill stem components and premium
casing products. As drill stem products are not consumables, our
customers could elect to defer purchases until such time as they
determine that steel prices have stabilized or returned to more
normalized conditions. Our forward-looking statements do not
assume that there will be any reduced demand for our drill stem
products or premium casing as a result of increased prices
caused by the current shortages being experienced in the
worldwide steel markets. Reduced demand could adversely affect
our results of operations.
|
|
|
Interruptions of supply of raw materials could materially
adversely affect our results of operations. |
We rely on various suppliers to supply the components utilized
to manufacture our drilling products and premium casing. The
availability of the raw materials is not only a function of the
availability of steel, but also the alloy materials that are
utilized by our suppliers in manufacturing tubulars that meet
our proprietary chemistries. Currently, there is a worldwide
shortage of scrap, coke and alloys that has caused raw material
prices to increase for steel tubulars, billets and bars utilized
in our manufacturing operations. To date, these shortages have
not caused a material disruption in availability or our
manufacturing operations, however, there can be no assurance
that material disruptions could not occur in the future. If
material disruptions to raw materials availability occur, it
could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability
to increase our manufacturing operations to meet the increased
revenues upon which our forward-looking statements are based.
|
|
|
Due to intense competition in our industry, our revenues
may decline if we do not develop, produce, and commercialize new
competitive technologies and products or if we are unable to
adequately protect our current and future intellectual property
rights relating to our technologies and products. |
The markets for our premium products and services are
characterized by continual developments. Substantial
improvements in the scope and quality of product function and
performance can occur over a short period of time. In order to
remain competitive, we must be able to develop commercially
competitive products in a timely manner in response to changes
in technology. Our ability to develop new products and maintain
competitive advantages depends on our ability to design and
commercially market products that meet the needs of our
customers, including delivery schedules and product
specifications.
Additionally, the time and expense invested in product
development may not result in commercially feasible applications
that provide revenues. We could be required to write-off our
entire investment in a new product that does not reach
commercial viability. Moreover, we may experience operating
losses after new products are introduced and commercialized
because of high start-up costs, unexpected manufacturing costs
or problems, or lack of demand.
Many of our products and the processes we use to manufacture
them have been granted U.S. and international patent protection,
or have patent applications pending. Nevertheless, patents may
not be granted for our applications and, if patents are issued,
the claims allowed may not be sufficient to protect our
29
technology. If our patents are not enforceable, or if any of our
products infringe patents held by others, our financial results
may be adversely affected. Our competitors may be able to
independently develop technology that is similar to ours without
infringing on our patents, which is especially true
internationally where the protection of intellectual property
rights may not be as effective. In addition, obtaining and
maintaining intellectual property protection internationally may
be significantly more expensive than doing so domestically. We
may have to spend substantial time and money defending our
patents and, after our patents expire, our competitors will not
be legally constrained from developing products substantially
similar to ours.
|
|
|
Our results of operations and financial condition are
dependent upon our ability to successfully increase and
decrease, without material disruption, our manufacturing
capacity and expense in response to changes in demand and to
maintain prices for our products, which can be adversely
affected by changes in industry conditions and competitive
forces. |
Our projections assume steady to modest increasing demand for
our products and services during 2005, in particular our drill
stem products. In the event demand for these products increases,
we will be required to increase our production during peak
demand periods with minimal operational disruption and
inefficiency. If this does not happen, or we experience
difficulties in this regard, our results of operations during
this ramp-up for high demand periods could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
Our international operations may experience severe
interruptions due to political, economic, or other risks, which
could adversely affect our results of operations and financial
condition. |
For the year ended December 31, 2004, we have derived
approximately 39% of our total revenues from our facilities
outside the U.S. In addition, a large part of sales from
our domestic locations were for use in foreign countries. In
addition, many of our key manufacturing operations are outside
of the U.S., including Mexico, Italy, United Kingdom, China,
Indonesia, and Singapore. Our operations in certain
international locations are subject to various political and
economic conditions existing in those countries that could
disrupt operations. These risks include:
|
|
|
|
|
changes in foreign tax laws; |
|
|
|
changes in regulations and labor practices; |
|
|
|
currency fluctuations and devaluations; |
|
|
|
currency restrictions, banking crises, and limitations on
repatriation of profits; and |
|
|
|
political instability or military conflict. |
Our foreign operations may suffer disruptions, and we may incur
losses that will not be covered by insurance. We have not
historically carried political risk insurance. In particular,
terrorist attacks and other threats to U.S. national
security and resulting U.S. military activity throughout
the world increase the possibility that our operations could be
interrupted or adversely affected. Such disruption could result
in our inability to ship products in a timely and cost-effective
manner or our inability to place contractors and employees in
various countries or regions.
Any material currency fluctuations or devaluations, or political
events that disrupt oil and gas exploration and production or
the movement of funds and assets could materially adversely
affect our results of operations and financial position.
As of December 31, 2004, approximately $73.6 million
of our revenues were earned by our Chinese operations. As is
customary in this country, it is common for our Chinese
operations to settle receivables and payables through bearer
bonds and notes. At December 31, 2004, we were not holding
any such notes. To date, our Chinese operations have not
experienced significant losses as a result of such practice;
however, there can be no assurance that such losses could not
occur in the future. Any such losses could have a materially
adverse affect on our results of operations in the period in
which they occur.
30
We have renewed an agreement with Voest-Alpine, an entity of
which we own 50.01%, to purchase green tubulars through
September 2007. Our future results could be adversely affected
if we are unable to use or resell these tubulars. In addition,
we have agreed to be responsible for paying any
anti-dumping duties in the U.S. on the resale
of these tubulars, which could affect our ability to resell the
tubulars in the U.S. Further, our long-term supply contract
with Voest-Alpine is denominated in Euros. We have no
significant offset for revenues in Euros and we have not hedged
for currency risk with respect to this contract. Thus, a
material long-term strengthening of the Euro versus the
U.S. dollar could materially adversely affect our results
of operations.
|
|
|
In connection with our business operations, we could be
subject to substantial liability claims that adversely affect
our results of operations. |
Our products are complex, and the failure of this equipment to
operate properly or to meet specifications may greatly increase
our customers costs of drilling a well. In addition, many
of these products are used in hazardous drilling and production
applications where an accident or product failure can cause
personal injury or loss of life; damage to property, equipment,
or the environment; regulatory investigations and penalties; and
the suspension of the end-users operations. If our
products or services fail to meet specifications or are involved
in accidents or failures, we could face warranty, contract, or
other litigation claims for which we may be held responsible and
our reputation for providing quality products may suffer.
Our insurance may not be adequate in risk coverage or policy
limits to cover all losses or liabilities that we may incur or
be responsible. Moreover, in the future we may not be able to
maintain insurance at levels of risk coverage or policy limits
that we deem adequate or at premiums that are reasonable for us,
particularly in the recent environment of significant insurance
premium increases. Further, any claims made under our policies
will likely cause our premiums to increase.
Any future damages deemed to be caused by our products or
services that are assessed against us and that are not covered
by insurance, or that are in excess of policy limits or subject
to substantial deductibles, could have a material adverse effect
on our results of operations and financial condition. Litigation
and claims for which we are not insured can occur, including
employee claims, intellectual property claims, breach of
contract claims, and warranty claims. Our forward-looking
statements assume that such uninsured claims or issues will not
occur. We account for warranty reserves on a specific
identification basis. As a result, a significant unexpected
warranty issue during a particular quarter or year could cause a
material reduction in our results of operations in the quarter
or year that the reserve for such warranty is made.
|
|
|
We are subject to environmental, health, and safety laws
and regulations that expose us to potential financial
liability. |
Our operations are regulated under a number of federal, state,
local, and foreign environmental laws and regulations, which
govern, among other things, the discharge of hazardous materials
into the air and water, as well as the handling, storage, and
disposal of hazardous materials and the remediation of
contaminated sites. Compliance with these environmental laws is
a major consideration in the manufacturing of our products.
Because we use and generate hazardous substances and wastes in
our manufacturing operations, we may be subject to material
financial liability for any investigation and clean up of such
hazardous materials, and any related personal injury damages or
toxic tort claims. We have not historically carried insurance
for such matters.
In addition, many of our current and former properties are or
have been used for industrial purposes. Accordingly, we also may
be subject to financial liabilities relating to the
investigation and remediation of hazardous materials resulting
from the action of previous owners or operators of industrial
facilities on those sites. Liability in many instances may be
imposed on us regardless of the legality of the original actions
relating to the hazardous or toxic substances or whether or not
we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence of those
substances.
We are also subject to various federal, state, local, and
foreign laws and regulations relating to safety and health
conditions in our manufacturing facilities. Those laws and
regulations may subject us to material
31
financial penalties or liabilities for any noncompliance, as
well as potential business disruption if any of our facilities
or a portion of any facility is required to be temporarily
closed as a result of any violation of those laws and
regulations. Any such financial liability or business disruption
could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition
and results of operations.
|
|
|
Our results of operations could be adversely affected by
actions under U.S. trade laws and new foreign entrants into
U.S. markets. |
Although we are a U.S.-based manufacturing company, we do own
and operate international manufacturing operations that support
our U.S.-based business. If actions under U.S. trade laws
were instituted that limited our access to these products, our
ability to meet our customer specifications and delivery
requirements would be reduced. Any adverse effects on our
ability to import products from our foreign subsidiaries could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Additionally, foreign producers of tubular goods have been found
to have sold their products, which may include premium
connections, for export to the U.S. at prices that are
lower than the cost of production, or their prices in their home
market, or a major third-country market. Anti-dumping orders
restricting the manner and price at which tubular goods from
certain countries can be imported are currently in effect. If
such orders are revoked or changed, we could be exposed to
increased competition from imports that could reduce our sales
and market share. In addition, the premium connections market
served by our Atlas Bradford product line is highly competitive.
The level of competition could further increase if foreign steel
mills, with their own lines of internationally accepted premium
connections, more successfully penetrate the U.S. market,
which could adversely affect our results of operations.
|
|
Item 7A. |
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
Financial Instruments
We are currently exposed to certain market risks arising from
transactions that we enter into in the normal course of
business. These risks relate to fluctuations in foreign currency
exchange rates and changes in interest rates. Refer to
Note 1 to the financial statements included elsewhere in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information
on financial instruments.
Foreign Currency Risk
The functional currency for the majority of our international
operations is the U.S. dollar. Adjustments resulting from
the remeasurment of the local currency financial statements into
the U.S dollar functional currency, which uses a
combination of current and historical exchange rates, are
included in net income in the current period. The functional
currency of our Canadian, Venezuelan and Chinese operations is
the local currency. Adjustments resulting from the translation
of the local functional currency financial statements to the
U.S dollar, which is based on current exchange rates, are
included in stockholders equity in the current period. In
addition, our long-term supply contract with Voest-Alpine is
denominated in Euros. Foreign currency transaction gains and
losses are reflected in income for the period. Net foreign
currency transaction gains (losses) for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were ($2.7 million),
$3.2 million, and $(0.2 million), respectively. The
foreign currency transaction losses realized in 2004 were
primarily from the U.S. dollar weakening in relation to the
Euro and British Pound. The foreign currency transaction gains
realized in 2003 relate primarily to the strengthening of the
Canadian dollar and the British pound in relation to the
U.S. dollar.
32
Interest Rates
We are and will be subject to market risk for changes in
interest rates related primarily to our long-term debt. The
following table summarizes our debt obligations at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, that are sensitive to changes
in interest rates.
The tables present principal cash flows by expected maturity
dates and weighted average interest rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
2009 | |
|
Thereafter | |
2004 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
|
$ |
1,273 |
|
|
$ |
199,705 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
175,245 |
|
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
9.28 |
% |
|
|
9.32 |
% |
|
|
9.22 |
% |
|
|
8.96 |
% |
|
|
8.94 |
% |
|
|
5.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2006 | |
|
2007 | |
|
2008 | |
|
Thereafter | |
2003 |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Long-term debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate
|
|
$ |
2,642 |
|
|
$ |
285 |
|
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
199,528 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
176,559 |
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
9.30 |
% |
|
|
9.32 |
% |
|
|
9.33 |
% |
|
|
9.22 |
% |
|
|
8.96 |
% |
|
|
8.97 |
% |
|
Variable rate
|
|
$ |
7,143 |
|
|
$ |
7,143 |
|
|
$ |
42,892 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
Average interest rate
|
|
|
4.13 |
% |
|
|
4.12 |
% |
|
|
4.12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004, our long-term borrowings at
variable rates were paid off, therefore, we were not exposed to
the risk of cash flow variability due to increased or decreased
interest expense in the event of changes in short-term interest
rates. However, the Companys fixed rate Senior Notes
outstanding at December 31, 2004 subject the Company to
risks related to changes in the fair value of the debt and
exposes the Company to potential gains or losses if it were to
repay or refinance such debt. A 1% change in market interest
rates would increase or decrease the fair value of our fixed
rate debt by approximately $9 million to $10 million.
The fair value of financial instruments which differed from
their carrying value at December 31, 2004 and 2003, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
Carrying | |
|
Fair | |
|
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
Value | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In millions) | |
95/8% Senior
Notes due 2007
|
|
$ |
199.5 |
|
|
$ |
225.1 |
|
|
$ |
199.3 |
|
|
$ |
229.0 |
|
9% Senior Notes due 2009
|
|
|
175.0 |
|
|
|
196.7 |
|
|
|
175.0 |
|
|
|
196.8 |
|
|
|
Item 8. |
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data |
The following consolidated financial statements are filed in
this Item 8:
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on
Internal Control over Financial Reporting |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2004 and 2003 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
33
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Grant Prideco, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Grant Prideco, Inc. as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and
the related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2004. Our audits
also included the financial statement schedule listed in the
Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Grant Prideco, Inc. at December 31,
2004 and 2003, and the consolidated results of its operations
and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
As described in Note 10 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for
goodwill effective January 1, 2002.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated March 29, 2005,
expressed an unqualified opinion on managements assessment
and an adverse opinion on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting.
Houston, Texas
March 29, 2005
34
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
945,643 |
|
|
$ |
803,818 |
|
|
$ |
609,390 |
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
560,807 |
|
|
|
533,572 |
|
|
|
472,220 |
|
|
Sales and marketing
|
|
|
128,585 |
|
|
|
106,589 |
|
|
|
27,828 |
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
85,071 |
|
|
|
69,251 |
|
|
|
52,112 |
|
|
Research and engineering
|
|
|
20,473 |
|
|
|
17,711 |
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
Other charges
|
|
|
9,035 |
|
|
|
31,398 |
|
|
|
7,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
803,971 |
|
|
|
758,521 |
|
|
|
562,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
141,672 |
|
|
|
45,297 |
|
|
|
46,995 |
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(41,889 |
) |
|
|
(43,871 |
) |
|
|
(27,040 |
) |
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
11,164 |
|
|
|
(982 |
) |
Equity Income (Loss) in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
|
5,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,926 |
) |
|
|
(33,185 |
) |
|
|
(22,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and
Minority Interests
|
|
|
101,746 |
|
|
|
12,112 |
|
|
|
24,315 |
|
Income Tax Provision
|
|
|
(31,710 |
) |
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
|
(7,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations Before Minority Interests
|
|
|
70,036 |
|
|
|
7,873 |
|
|
|
16,741 |
|
Minority Interests
|
|
|
(5,243 |
) |
|
|
(3,216 |
) |
|
|
(3,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
64,793 |
|
|
|
4,657 |
|
|
|
13,690 |
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
|
|
|
(9,527 |
) |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
|
|
|
55,266 |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
13,046 |
|
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
55,266 |
|
|
$ |
5,190 |
|
|
$ |
6,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Net Income Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
123,325 |
|
|
|
121,646 |
|
|
|
111,459 |
|
Diluted Net Income Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.12 |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
126,091 |
|
|
|
123,401 |
|
|
|
112,854 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
35
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except par | |
|
|
value amounts) | |
ASSETS |
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
47,552 |
|
|
$ |
19,230 |
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts
of $8,024 and $3,539 for 2004 and 2003, respectively
|
|
|
202,084 |
|
|
|
212,285 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
288,820 |
|
|
|
231,994 |
|
|
Deferred charges
|
|
|
17,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
26,473 |
|
|
|
30,283 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
12,033 |
|
|
|
12,924 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
3,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596,767 |
|
|
|
510,863 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
244,305 |
|
|
|
251,236 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
393,993 |
|
|
|
396,944 |
|
Intangible Assets, Net
|
|
|
43,807 |
|
|
|
36,250 |
|
Investments In and Advances to Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
49,159 |
|
|
|
47,786 |
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
16,435 |
|
|
|
18,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,344,466 |
|
|
$ |
1,262,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
|
$ |
11,073 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
71,741 |
|
|
|
74,408 |
|
|
Accrued labor and benefits
|
|
|
53,060 |
|
|
|
30,406 |
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
21,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal income taxes payable
|
|
|
8,144 |
|
|
|
14,401 |
|
|
Current deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
|
3,763 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
33,854 |
|
|
|
32,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,501 |
|
|
|
166,255 |
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
377,773 |
|
|
|
426,853 |
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
36,433 |
|
|
|
26,965 |
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
13,224 |
|
|
|
23,843 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (See Notes 15 and 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interests
|
|
|
15,994 |
|
|
|
12,031 |
|
Stockholders Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized
10,000 shares; no shares issued in 2004 or 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized
300,000 shares; issued 124,516 and 121,250 in 2004 and
2003, respectively
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
1,212 |
|
|
Capital in excess of par value
|
|
|
530,687 |
|
|
|
488,350 |
|
|
Unearned compensation
|
|
|
(8,300 |
) |
|
|
(6,228 |
) |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
192,289 |
|
|
|
137,023 |
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(12,291 |
) |
|
|
(16,917 |
) |
|
Treasury stock, at cost, 617 and 535 shares in 2004 and
2003, respectively
|
|
|
(8,483 |
) |
|
|
(6,692 |
) |
|
Deferred compensation obligation
|
|
|
10,394 |
|
|
|
9,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
705,541 |
|
|
|
606,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,344,466 |
|
|
$ |
1,262,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
36
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
55,266 |
|
|
$ |
5,190 |
|
|
$ |
6,634 |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of accounting change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,412 |
|
|
|
Loss on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
11,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of businesses, net
|
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
(3,393 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
43,220 |
|
|
|
44,688 |
|
|
|
28,831 |
|
|
|
Non-cash portion of other charges
|
|
|
6,010 |
|
|
|
31,247 |
|
|
|
2,580 |
|
|
|
Bad debt expense
|
|
|
3,844 |
|
|
|
1,948 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
Deferred income tax
|
|
|
20,096 |
|
|
|
(16,133 |
) |
|
|
(3,317 |
) |
|
|
Equity (income) loss in unconsolidated affiliates, net of
dividends
|
|
|
6,525 |
|
|
|
14,127 |
|
|
|
10,746 |
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
4,660 |
|
|
|
2,866 |
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
Deferred compensation expense
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
Minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries, net of dividends
|
|
|
2,103 |
|
|
|
1,326 |
|
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
(4,466 |
) |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of
businesses acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
2,278 |
|
|
|
(29,747 |
) |
|
|
20,643 |
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(60,039 |
) |
|
|
(4,413 |
) |
|
|
50,169 |
|
|
|
Deferred charges
|
|
|
(17,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
6,768 |
|
|
|
29,500 |
|
|
|
4,370 |
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
3,087 |
|
|
|
(281 |
) |
|
|
(2,011 |
) |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
13,075 |
|
|
|
(1,039 |
) |
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
21,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
17,197 |
|
|
|
(5,652 |
) |
|
|
(6,121 |
) |
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(10,306 |
) |
|
|
(3,650 |
) |
|
|
(6,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
113,170 |
|
|
|
82,938 |
|
|
|
118,686 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(33,833 |
) |
|
|
(8,272 |
) |
|
|
(265,172 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of businesses, net of cash disposed
|
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
|
30,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net of cash
disposed
|
|
|
19,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
(4,167 |
) |
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
|
(3,794 |
) |
|
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(37,879 |
) |
|
|
(41,418 |
) |
|
|
(45,781 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of fixed assets
|
|
|
8,459 |
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(45,381 |
) |
|
|
(23,804 |
) |
|
|
(313,836 |
) |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on revolver debt, net
|
|
|
(14,320 |
) |
|
|
(42,982 |
) |
|
|
(2,391 |
) |
|
Borrowings on debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,635 |
|
|
Repayments on debt
|
|
|
(49,781 |
) |
|
|
(17,608 |
) |
|
|
(17,098 |
) |
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(2,508 |
) |
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
|
|
(2,279 |
) |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
25,791 |
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan purchases
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(39,890 |
) |
|
|
(62,412 |
) |
|
|
206,040 |
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
|
|
|
28,322 |
|
|
|
(2,648 |
) |
|
|
11,494 |
|
Cash at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
19,230 |
|
|
|
21,878 |
|
|
|
10,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Year
|
|
$ |
47,552 |
|
|
$ |
19,230 |
|
|
$ |
21,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
37
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock | |
|
Capital | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.01 Par | |
|
in Excess | |
|
|
|
|
|
Accum Other | |
|
Treasury Stock | |
|
Deferred | |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
of Par | |
|
Unearned | |
|
Retained | |
|
Comprehensive | |
|
| |
|
Compensation | |
|
|
|
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Value | |
|
Compensation | |
|
Earnings | |
|
Income | |
|
Shares | |
|
Amount | |
|
Obligation | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2001
|
|
|
109,293 |
|
|
$ |
1,093 |
|
|
$ |
364,193 |
|
|
$ |
(2,328 |
) |
|
$ |
125,199 |
|
|
$ |
(22,551 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,551 |
) |
|
$ |
5,912 |
|
|
$ |
468,967 |
|
|
Components of Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,740 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,740 |
) |
|
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Instruments, net of tax of
($74)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
Unrealized Gain on Securities, net of tax of ($24)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,112 |
|
|
Stock Grant and Options Exercised
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
Tax Benefit of Options Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733 |
|
|
Deferred Compensation Obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
421 |
|
|
|
(954 |
) |
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
Issuance of Stock for Acquisition
|
|
|
11,353 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
110,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,911 |
|
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,550 |
|
|
|
(7,550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
Purchase of Treasury Stock for Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(2,279 |
) |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2002
|
|
|
120,815 |
|
|
$ |
1,208 |
|
|
$ |
484,819 |
|
|
$ |
(7,743 |
) |
|
$ |
131,833 |
|
|
$ |
(24,073 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,409 |
) |
|
$ |
7,237 |
|
|
$ |
588,872 |
|
|
Components of Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,818 |
|
|
Minimum Pension Liability, net of tax of $356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,346 |
|
|
Stock Grant and Options Exercised
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
Tax Benefit of Options Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
Deferred Compensation Obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
(2,499 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Restricted Stock, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,014 |
|
|
Compensation Expense for Accelerated Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
Purchase of Treasury Stock for Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
|
|
2,388 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2003
|
|
|
121,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,212 |
|
|
$ |
488,350 |
|
|
$ |
(6,228 |
) |
|
$ |
137,023 |
|
|
$ |
(16,917 |
) |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
$ |
(6,692 |
) |
|
$ |
9,366 |
|
|
$ |
606,114 |
|
|
Components of Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,266 |
|
|
Currency Translation Adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,966 |
|
|
Minimum Pension Liability, net of tax of ($354)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,892 |
|
|
Stock Grant and Options Exercised
|
|
|
2,998 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
25,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,791 |
|
|
Tax Benefit of Options Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,717 |
|
|
Deferred Compensation Obligation
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
|
|
(715 |
) |
|
Issuance of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,582 |
|
|
|
(5,582 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan Issuance
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
Amortization of Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,510 |
|
|
Compensation Expense for Accelerated Vesting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,304 |
|
|
Purchase of Treasury Stock for Executive Deferred Compensation
Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(2,508 |
) |
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2004
|
|
|
124,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,245 |
|
|
$ |
530,687 |
|
|
$ |
(8,300 |
) |
|
$ |
192,289 |
|
|
$ |
(12,291 |
) |
|
|
(617 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,483 |
) |
|
$ |
10,394 |
|
|
$ |
705,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
consolidated financial statements.
38
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1. |
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies |
The Company is the world leader in drill stem technology
development and drill pipe manufacturing, sales and service; a
global leader in drill bit technology, manufacturing, sales and
service; and a leading provider of high-performance engineered
connections and premium tubular products and services. The
Companys drill stem and drill bit products are used to
drill oil and gas wells while its tubular technology and
services are primarily used in drilling and completing oil and
gas wells. The Companys customers include drilling
contractors; North American oil country tubular goods (OCTG)
distributors; major, independent and state-owned oil companies;
and other oilfield service companies. The Company operates
primarily through three business segments: (1) Drilling
Products and Services, (2) Drill Bits and (3) Tubular
Technology and Services. In the first quarter of 2004, the
Company announced an organizational restructuring that resulted
in the former Marine Products and Services businesses now being
reflected in the Tubular Technology and Services segment. Prior
periods have been restated for comparability.
The Companys business is dependent on the level of
drilling activity worldwide, which depends on the level of
capital spending by major, independent and state-owned
exploration and production companies. This capital spending is
driven by current and forecasted prices for oil and gas, and the
perceived stability and sustainability of those prices. The
Companys Drilling Products and Services segment and Drill
Bit segments revenues most closely track worldwide rig
counts, while its Tubular Technology and Services business is
dependent on the U.S. rig count, particularly the natural
gas rig count, and more specifically, rigs drilling for deep gas
in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico.
|
|
|
Principles of Consolidation |
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Grant Prideco, Inc. and its majority-owned subsidiaries (Grant
Prideco). The following table lists less than 100% owned
consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% Ownership | |
|
|
| |
Jiangsu Shuguang Grant Prideco Tubular Limited (JSG)
|
|
|
70 |
% |
Tianjin Grant Prideco (TGP)
|
|
|
60 |
% |
H-Tech
|
|
|
54 |
% |
The minority interests of the above listed subsidiaries are
included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statements of
Operations as Minority Interests. Intercompany
transactions and balances between Grant Pridecos
businesses have been eliminated. The Company accounts for its
50% or less-owned affiliates using the equity-method of
accounting, as the Company has a significant influence but not a
controlling interest (see Note 7).
Certain reclassifications of prior year balances have been made
to conform such amounts to corresponding 2004 classifications.
These reclassifications have no impact on net income. As
explained in Note 6, in 2004, the Company completed the
sale of its Texas Arai division. Prior year results of
operations of Texas Arai have been reclassified as discontinued
operations.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of certain assets and
liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the
related reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. The significant estimates made by management
in the accompanying consolidated financial
39
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
statements include reserves for inventory obsolescence,
restructuring, self-insurance, valuation of goodwill and
long-lived assets, allowance for doubtful accounts,
determination of income taxes, contingent liabilities and
purchase accounting allocations. Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
Allowance for uncollectible accounts of $8.0 million and
$3.5 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, are provided primarily based on specific account
collection issues but also include a general component. The
provision for bad debt expense was $3.8 million,
$1.9 million and $1.1 million for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively. The increase
from 2003 to 2004 relates to foreign receivables at the
Companys Drill Bits segment.
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had
$0.2 million and $0.3 million of restricted cash,
respectively. The restricted cash balance at December 31,
2004 and 2003 primarily related to the Companys 60%
interest in TGP and is subject to dividend and distribution
restrictions; however, such cash is available to fund the local
operations in China.
Inventory costs are stated at the lower of cost or market using
the first-in, first-out method. The Company values its
inventories primarily using standard costs, which approximate
actual costs, that include raw materials, direct labor and
manufacturing overhead allocations. The Company performs
obsolescence reviews on its slow-moving and excess inventories
and establishes reserves based on current assessments of factors
such as age of inventory, technological obsolescence, future
product demands, market conditions and related management
incentives.
Inventories by category are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Raw Materials, Components and Supplies
|
|
$ |
104,543 |
|
|
$ |
96,528 |
|
Work in Process
|
|
|
59,308 |
|
|
|
36,889 |
|
Finished Goods
|
|
|
124,969 |
|
|
|
98,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
288,820 |
|
|
$ |
231,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Work in process and finished goods inventories include the cost
of materials, labor and plant overhead.
Reserves for excess and obsolete inventory included in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2004 and 2003
were $13.0 million and $14.9 million, respectively.
|
|
|
Property, Plant and Equipment |
Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost. Maintenance
and repairs are expensed as incurred. The costs of replacements,
betterments and renewals are capitalized. When properties and
equipment are sold, retired, or otherwise disposed of, the cost
and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated and the
resulting gain or loss is recognized. Depreciation on fixed
assets, including those under capital leases, is
40
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives for the respective categories. The useful lives of
the major classes of property, plant and equipment are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life | |
|
|
| |
Buildings and Improvements
|
|
|
7-30 years |
|
Machinery and Equipment
|
|
|
2-10 years |
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
3-7 years |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Land
|
|
$ |
21,521 |
|
|
$ |
22,715 |
|
Buildings and Improvements
|
|
|
78,557 |
|
|
|
85,322 |
|
Machinery and Equipment
|
|
|
269,517 |
|
|
|
255,788 |
|
Furniture and Fixtures
|
|
|
29,058 |
|
|
|
23,479 |
|
Construction in Progress
|
|
|
19,655 |
|
|
|
19,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418,308 |
|
|
|
407,160 |
|
Less: Accumulated Depreciation
|
|
|
(174,003 |
) |
|
|
(155,924 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
244,305 |
|
|
$ |
251,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense was $38.8 million, $42.0 million
and $30.2 million for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively, which includes depreciation
of assets related to capital leases.
The Company reviews long-lived asset groups for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable and
when management determines it is more likely than not that an
asset group will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly
before the end of its previously estimated useful life. This
consists of comparing the carrying amount of an asset group with
its expected undiscounted future net cash flows. If the asset
groups carrying amount is less than such cash flow
estimate, it is written down to its fair value based on expected
discounted future cash flows. Estimates of expected future cash
flows represent managements best estimate based on
currently available information and reasonable and supportable
assumptions. Any impairment recognized is permanent and may not
be restored. See Note 3 for discussion related to the
Companys fixed asset write-downs.
|
|
|
Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets |
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Under
SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets that have
indefinite useful lives are subject to at least an annual
impairment test and more frequently if circumstances indicate
their value may not be recoverable. Goodwill is tested for
impairment using a two-step process that begins with an
estimation of the fair value of each of the Companys
reporting units compared with its carrying value. If the
carrying amount exceeds the fair value of a reporting unit, a
second-step test is completed comparing the implied fair value
of the reporting units goodwill to its carrying value to
measure the amount of impairment. Intangible assets that are not
amortized will be tested for impairment at least annually by
comparing the fair values of those assets to their carrying
values. Other identifiable intangible assets that are subject to
amortization are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
years expected to be benefited, ranging from 1.5 to
20 years. These amortizable intangible assets are reviewed
for impairment if circumstances indicate their value may not be
recoverable based on a comparison of fair value to carrying
value. Based on the Companys annual goodwill impairment
test as of October 1, 2004, the Company does not believe
any of its
41
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
goodwill is impaired as of December 31, 2004. See
Note 10 for discussion related to the Companys
goodwill and identifiable intangible asset impairments.
The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation programs
using the intrinsic value method of accounting established by
Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related
interpretations. Under APB No. 25, no compensation expense
is recognized when the exercise price of an employee stock
option is equal to the market price of common stock on the grant
date and all other provisions of the grant are fixed.
Nonemployee stock-based compensation is accounted for using the
fair value method in accordance with SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (see
Note 12).
Pro forma information regarding net income (loss) and net income
(loss) per share is required by SFAS No. 123. The pro
forma information has been determined as if the Company had
accounted for its stock options under the fair value method. The
following is a summary of the Companys net income (loss)
and net income (loss) per share as reported and pro forma as if
the fair value-based method of accounting defined in
SFAS No. 123 had been applied. For purposes of pro
forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is
amortized to expense over the options vesting period. The
pro forma effects of applying SFAS No. 123 may not be
representative of the effects on reported net income for future
years since options vest over several years and additional
awards are made each year.
Pro forma information applying to the fair value method follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share | |
|
|
amounts) | |
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Reported
|
|
$ |
55,266 |
|
|
$ |
5,190 |
|
|
$ |
6,634 |
|
|
|
Add: Stock-Based Employee Compensation Expense Included in
Reported Net Income, Net of Related Tax Effects(a)
|
|
|
4,642 |
|
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
Deduct: Stock-Based Employee Compensation Expense Determined
Under the Fair Value Method for All Awards, Net of Related Tax
Effects
|
|
|
(9,565 |
) |
|
|
(12,208 |
) |
|
|
(18,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$ |
50,343 |
|
|
$ |
(4,187 |
) |
|
$ |
(10,277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic as Reported
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Pro Forma
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted as Reported
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Pro Forma
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
(0.03 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.09 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes stock based compensation, which is included in the
non-cash portion of other charges in the Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows. |
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use
in estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no
vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition,
option valuation models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. See
Note 12
42
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
for a discussion of the assumptions used in the option-pricing
model and estimated fair value of employee stock options.
On December 20, 2002, the Company assumed sponsorship of
two defined benefit pension plans in connection with the
ReedHycalog acquisition. Generally accepted accounting
principles require the Company to develop actuarial assumptions
in determining annual pension expense and benefit obligations
for the related plans. These assumptions are reviewed on an
annual basis and modified as necessary to reflect changed
conditions. Further, the recognition of a minimum pension
liability and in certain circumstances an adjustment to
stockholders equity is required when the fair market value
of year-end pension assets are less than the accumulated benefit
obligation. Future increases or decreases to the minimum pension
liability are dependent upon actuarial experience, including
whether asset returns exceed assumed rates of return.
The assets and related obligations of the defined benefit
pension plans are presented in Note 13. The plans
assets are valued using market quotations and consist primarily
of marketable equity and debt instruments. The plans
obligations and annual pension expenses are determined by
independent actuaries and through the use of assumptions. The
key assumptions used in measuring the plans obligations include
the discount rate and the estimated future return on plan
assets. In determining the discount rate, the Company utilizes
the yield on high-quality, fixed-income investments currently
available with maturities corresponding to the anticipated
timing of the benefit payments. Asset returns are based upon the
anticipated average rate of earnings expected on the invested
funds of the plans.
|
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation |
The functional currency for the majority of the Companys
international operations is the U.S. dollar. Adjustments
resulting from the remeasurment of the local currency financial
statements into the U.S dollar functional currency, which uses a
combination of current and historical exchange rates, are
included in net income in the current period. The functional
currency of the Companys Canadian, Venezuelan and Chinese
operations is the local currency. Adjustments resulting from the
translation of the local functional currency financial
statements into the U.S dollar, which is based on current
exchange rates, are included in stockholders equity in the
current period. In addition, the Companys long-term supply
contract with Voest-Alpine is denominated in Euros. Foreign
currency transaction gains and losses are reflected in income
for the period. Net foreign currency transaction gains (losses)
for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 were
($2.7 million), $3.2 million, and $(0.2 million),
respectively. The foreign currency transaction losses realized
in 2004 were primarily from the U.S. dollar weakening in
relation to the Euro and British Pound. The foreign currency
transaction gains realized in 2003 relate primarily to the
strengthening of the Canadian dollar and the British pound in
relation to the U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments Other Than
Derivatives |
The Companys financial instruments other than derivative
instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents,
trade receivables, trade payables and debt. The book values of
cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and trade payables
are considered to be representative of their respective fair
values due to the short-term maturity of those instruments. The
Company determined fair value for debt based on the traded
market quote as of the applicable period. The Company had
approximately $382.0 million and $436.6 million of
debt at December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The fair
value of the debt at December 31, 2004 and 2003 was
$429.2 million and $488.1 million, respectively.
43
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Financing |
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet hedging,
financing arrangements or contracts except those associated with
our investments in two companies that are not consolidated in
the Companys financial statements: Voest-Alpine Tubulars
GmbH & Co KG (Voest-Alpine) and IntelliServ, Inc.
(IntelliServ). These investments are accounted for under the
equity-method of accounting. The assets and liabilities of
Voest-Alpine are summarized in Note 7. Additionally,
Voest-Alpine has entered into forward contracts to cover its
currency risk related to accounts receivables and accounts
payables, has entered into interest rate swap agreements to
reduce its exposure to changes in floating interest rate
payments of its long-term bonds, and has also entered into an
agreement with a bank to sell a significant portion of its
accounts receivable. IntelliServ is the Companys
technology joint venture that is currently developing technology
for intelligent drill pipe that permits real-time transfer of
data through the drill string. IntelliServ does not have any
debt, other than trade payables relating primarily to research
and development expenses.
The Company has contingent liabilities and future claims for
which it has made estimates of the amount of the actual costs of
these liabilities or claims. These liabilities and claims
sometimes involve threatened or actual litigation where damages
have been quantified and the Company has made an assessment of
its exposure and recorded a provision to cover an expected loss
based on its experience in these matters and, when appropriate,
the advice of outside counsel or other outside experts. Examples
of areas where the Company has made important estimates of
future liabilities primarily include litigation, warranty
claims, environmental liabilities and contract claims.
|
|
|
Accounting for Income Taxes |
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared under
SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes,
assuming Grant Prideco was a separate entity for all periods
prior to the spinoff from Weatherford International Ltd.
(Weatherford). Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets
and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax bases. See Note 14 for further details.
In connection with the spinoff from Weatherford, Grant Prideco
and Weatherford entered into a tax allocation agreement (the
Tax Allocation Agreement). Under the terms of the
Tax Allocation Agreement, Grant Prideco will be responsible for
all taxes and associated liabilities relating to the historical
businesses of Grant Prideco. The Tax Allocation Agreement also
provides that any tax liabilities associated with the spinoff
shall be assumed and paid by Grant Prideco subject to certain
exceptions relating to changes in control of Weatherford. The
Tax Allocation Agreement further provides that in the event
there is a tax liability associated with the historical
operations of the Company that is offset by a tax benefit of
Weatherford, Weatherford will apply the tax benefit against such
tax liability and will be reimbursed for the value of such tax
benefit when and as Weatherford would have been able to
otherwise utilize that tax benefit for its own businesses. Also,
the Tax Allocation Agreement provides that Weatherford will have
the future benefit of any tax losses incurred by Grant Prideco
prior, as a part of a consolidated return with Weatherford, to
the spinoff, and Grant Prideco will be required to pay
Weatherford an amount of cash equal to any such benefit utilized
by Grant Prideco or which expires unused by Grant Prideco to the
extent those benefits are not utilized by Weatherford.
The Company recognizes revenues when the earnings process is
complete and collectibility is reasonably assured. With respect
to the Drilling Products and Services and Tubular Technology and
Services segments, this includes satisfying the following
criteria: the arrangement with the customer is evident; the
sales price is
44
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
fixed or determinable; the manufacturing process is complete
(including completion of all proper inspections); title and risk
of loss have passed to the customer and all delivery obligations
have been met. If requested in writing by the customer; delivery
may be satisfied through delivery to the Companys customer
storage location or to a third-party storage facility. With
respect to the Companys Drill Bits segment, revenue is
recognized when the customer runs the drill bit. Customer
advances or deposits are deferred and recognized as revenue when
the Company has completed all of its performance obligations
related to the sale. The Company also recognizes revenue as
services are performed. Additionally, the Company recognizes
revenues associated with rebillable shipping costs.
|
|
|
Deferred Revenues and Charges |
For sales transactions where title and risk of loss has
transferred to the customer but the supporting documentation
does not meet all of the criteria for revenue recognition prior
to the products being in the physical possession of the
customer, recognition of the revenues and related inventory
costs from these transactions are required to be deferred until
the customer takes physical possession. At December 31,
2004, the Company had deferred revenues and charges related to
such transactions of $21.4 million and $17.2 million,
respectively. The deferred charges represent customer-owned
finished goods inventory on deferred sales transactions for
which legal title transfer has occurred, but the product is not
yet in the customers physical possession. See Note 19
for information on the restatement of the first three quarters
of 2004. The impact of deferred revenues and charges on prior
years financial statements was not material.
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss) Per Share |
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net
income or loss by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year excluding non-vested restricted
shares. Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the
potential dilution from the exercise or conversion of securities
into common stock. Common stock equivalent shares are excluded
from the computation if their effect is antidilutive. The
computation of diluted earnings per share for 2004, 2003 and
2002 did not include options to purchase 3.7 million,
5.1 million and 5.2 million shares, respectively, of
common stock because their exercise prices were greater than the
average market price of the common stock.
The following table reconciles basic and diluted weighted
average shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Basic Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
123,325 |
|
|
|
121,646 |
|
|
|
111,459 |
|
Dilutive Effect of Stock Options and Restricted Stock, Net of
Assumed Repurchase of Treasury Shares
|
|
|
2,766 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
1,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Weighted Average Number of Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
126,091 |
|
|
|
123,401 |
|
|
|
112,854 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued the revised SFAS No. 123,
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R), which
addresses the accounting for share-based payment transactions in
which a company obtains employee services in exchange for
(a) equity instruments of the company or
(b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the
companys equity instruments or that may be settled by the
issuance of such equity instruments. This statement eliminates
the ability to account for employee share-based payment
transactions using APB No. 25 and requires instead that
such transactions be accounted for using the grant-date fair
value based method. This statement will be effective as of the
45
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that
begins after June 15, 2005 (July 1, 2005 for the
Company). Early adoption of SFAS 123R is encouraged. This
Statement applies to all awards granted or modified after the
Statements effective date. In addition, compensation cost
for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that
remain outstanding on the Statements effective date shall
be recognized on or after the effective date, as the related
services are rendered, based on the awards grant-date fair
value as previously calculated for the pro-forma disclosure
under SFAS 123.
The Company expects that upon the adoption of SFAS 123R,
the Company will apply the modified prospective application
transition method, as permitted by the Statement. Under such
transition method, upon the adoption of SFAS 123R, the
Companys financial statements for periods prior to the
effective date of the Statement will not be restated. The impact
of this Statement on the Companys financial statements or
its results of operations in 2005 and beyond will depend upon
various factors, among them the Companys future
compensation strategy. The Company expects that the effect of
applying this Statement on the Companys results of
operations in 2005 as it relates to existing option plans would
not be materially different from the SFAS 123 pro forma
effect previously reported.
In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151
Inventory Costs An Amendment of ARB
No. 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). SFAS 151
clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense,
freight, handling costs and spoilage should be expensed as
incurred and not included in overhead. Further, SFAS 151
requires that allocation of fixed and production facilities
overheads to conversion costs should be based on normal capacity
of the production facilities. The provisions in SFAS 151
are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years
beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not believe
that the adoption of SFAS 151 will have a significant
effect on its financial statements.
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act)
enacted on October 22, 2004 provides for a temporary 85%
dividends received deduction on certain foreign earnings
repatriated during a one-year period. The deduction would result
in an approximate 5.25% federal tax rate on the repatriated
foreign earnings. To qualify for the deduction, certain criteria
in the Act must be satisfied. The Company is in the process of
evaluating whether it will repatriate foreign earnings under the
repatriation provisions of the Act and if so, the amount that
will be repatriated. Through December 31, 2004, the Company
has not provided deferred taxes on certain foreign earnings
because such earnings were intended to be indefinitely
reinvested outside the United States. Whether the Company will
take advantage of this provision depends on a number of factors
including reviewing future Congressional guidance before a
decision can be made. Until that time, the Company will make no
change in its current intention to indefinitely reinvest certain
earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. If the Company were to
repatriate these earnings, a one-time tax benefit to the
Companys Consolidated Statements of Operations of up to
approximately $2.1 million could occur.
In December 2003, the FASB revised SFAS No. 132,
Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Post-Retirement Benefits. The revised Statement requires
new disclosures in addition to those required by the original
Statement about the assets, obligations, cash flows and net
periodic benefit costs of defined benefit pension plans and
other defined benefit post-retirement plans. As revised,
SFAS No. 132R is effective for financial statements
with fiscal years ending after December 15, 2003. The
interim-period disclosures required by this Statement were
effective for interim periods beginning after December 15,
2003. However, disclosure of the estimated future benefit
payments was effective for fiscal years ending after
June 14, 2004. The Company adopted SFAS 132R during
2004. The adoption of SFAS 132R did not have any impact on
the Companys results of operations or financial position.
See Note 13 for disclosures regarding the Companys
defined benefit pension plans.
In January 2003, the FASB Interpretation No. 46,
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities
(FIN No. 46) was issued. FIN No. 46
clarifies the application of Accounting Research
Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements, to variable interest entities (VIEs),
which are certain entities in which equity investors do not have
the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do
not have sufficient
46
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without
additional subordinated support from other parties. The
Interpretation is intended to achieve more consistent
application of consolidation policies to VIEs and, thus,
to improve comparability between enterprises engaged in similar
activities even if some of those activities are conducted
through VIEs. FIN No. 46 requires the entity,
which absorbs a majority of the variable income or loss of a VIE
be considered the primary beneficiary and requires consolidation
of the VIE. The Interpretation was effective immediately for
VIEs created after January 31, 2003, and to
VIEs in which the Company obtains an interest after that
date. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to
FIN No. 46, (FIN No. 46R), to clarify some
of the provisions of FIN No. 46 and to exempt certain
entities from its requirements. Under the new guidance, special
effective date provisions apply to enterprises that have fully
or partially applied FIN No. 46 prior to issuance of
this revised interpretation. Otherwise, application of
FIN No. 46R was required in financial statements of
public entities that have interests in structures that are
commonly referred to as special-purpose entities for periods
ending after December 15, 2003. Application by public
entities, other than small business issuers, for all other types
of VIEs was required in financial statements for periods
ending after March 15, 2004. The Company is not a primary
beneficiary of a VIEs VIE nor does it hold any
significant interests or involvement in a VIE. The adoption of
this interpretation did not have a material effect on the
Companys results of operations or financial position.
|
|
2. |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
The following table summarizes the components of accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustments
|
|
$ |
(12,289 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,255 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,073 |
) |
Minimum Pension Liability
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(662 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
$ |
(12,291 |
) |
|
$ |
(16,917 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During 2004, the Company incurred $9.0 million of pre-tax
charges, $6.2 million net of tax. These charges include
$3.8 million related to the relocation of the
Companys Corporate offices, $2.0 million due to lease
termination, severance and other exit costs related to the
Drilling Products rationalization program and
47
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
$3.2 million of severance costs related to the Tubular
Technology and Services organizational restructuring. The 2004
pre-tax charges are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tubular | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability | |
|
|
Drilling Products | |
|
Technology | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
and Services | |
|
and Services | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
Utilized | |
|
12/31/04 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Drilling Products Rationalization Program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease termination cost(a)
|
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,430 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
|
$ |
1,154 |
|
|
Severance costs(b)
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other exit costs(c)
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
1,154 |
|
Severance Costs(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Relocation Charge(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,051 |
|
|
$ |
3,207 |
|
|
$ |
3,777 |
|
|
$ |
9,035 |
|
|
$ |
4,104 |
|
|
$ |
1,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The lease termination cost of $1.4 million, primarily
recorded in the first quarter of 2004, is for a long-term lease
which is expected to be repaid over the next year for equipment
located at the Companys Canadian facility. Due to the
downsizing of the Companys Canadian operations, this
equipment will no longer be utilized. This amount was included
in Other Current Liabilities in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. |
|
(b) |
|
Severance costs of $0.3 million, primarily recorded in the
first quarter of 2004, relate to employees that were terminated
in connection with the downsizing of the Companys Canadian
operations. These costs relate to 79 employees and were paid in
July 2004. |
|
(c) |
|
Other exit costs of $0.3 million, primarily recorded in the
first quarter of 2004, are associated with the downsizing of the
Canadian operations. |
|
(d) |
|
Severance costs of $3.2 million, of which $0.9 million
was recorded in the first quarter of 2004 and $2.3 million
was recorded in the second quarter of 2004, relate to the
organizational restructuring of the Companys Tubular
Technology and Services segment. These costs relate to 4
employees and of the $3.2 million, $2.5 million
related to accelerated vesting of stock options with the
remaining $0.7 million paid by June 2004. |
|
(e) |
|
Corporate relocation charge of $3.8 million, recorded in
the third quarter of 2004, primarily relates to the non-cash
write-off of leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures
resulting from the relocation of the Companys Corporate
offices in September 2004. |
During 2003, the Company incurred $37.8 million of pre-tax
charges, $24.6 million net of tax. These charges, which
have all been utilized, include $24.9 million related to
fixed asset write-downs, $6.4 million related to inventory
reserves for exited product lines which are classified in cost
of sales, $6.4 million related to asset impairments and
$1.5 million related to stock based compensation expense.
48
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The 2003 pre-tax charges are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Products | |
|
Tubular Technology | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Services | |
|
and Services | |
|
Other | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Fixed Asset Write-Downs(a)
|
|
$ |
24,924 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,924 |
|
Other Impairments(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,396 |
|
Stock Compensation Expense(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
|
|
1,478 |
|
Contingent Liability Credit(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
(1,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,396 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
31,398 |
|
Inventory Reserves for Exited Product Lines(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,924 |
|
|
$ |
425 |
|
|
$ |
12,396 |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
37,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The write-down of fixed assets was reported as other charges and
related to assets taken out of service as part of the Drilling
Products and Services manufacturing rationalization
program. The amount was determined by use of internal appraisals
and evaluations to assess the net realizable value upon disposal
based on expected future cash flows. |
|
(b) |
|
The other impairments relate to two technology joint ventures.
The amount was determined by use of internal appraisals and
evaluations to assess the net realizable value upon disposal
based on expected future cash flows. |
|
(c) |
|
In May 2003, two members of the Board of Directors volunteered
to step down to reduce the number of common directors between
Grant Prideco and its former parent, Weatherford, and vesting of
their stock-based compensation was accelerated (See
Note 12). |
|
(d) |
|
In July 2003, the dispute underlying the 2000 $4.7 million
contingent liability accrual was settled for $3.3 million,
therefore a $1.4 million credit was recorded to reflect the
actual 2003 settlement of the liability accrued as a charge
taken in 2000. |
|
(e) |
|
The inventory reserves for the exited product lines were
reported as Cost of Sales and relate to the write-down of
industrial inventory drilling products, to their net estimated
realizable values. The amount was determined by use of internal
appraisals and evaluations to assess the estimated net
realizable value upon disposition. This inventory has been
completely liquidated as of December 31, 2004. |
49
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
During 2002, the Company incurred $7.0 million of pre-tax
charges, $4.9 million net of tax. These charges, which have
all been utilized, included $2.6 million related to fixed
asset write-downs and $4.4 million for executive severance
payments and related expenses and are summarized in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling | |
|
Tubular | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products | |
|
Technology | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Services | |
|
and Services | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Fixed Asset Write-Downs(a)
|
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,580 |
|
Severance(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,465 |
|
|
|
4,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,360 |
|
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
4,465 |
|
|
$ |
7,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The fixed asset write-downs relate to idle assets taken out of
service pursuant to the Companys ongoing automation and
efficiency initiatives and are classified as held for sale. The
amount was determined by use of internal appraisals and
evaluations to assess the estimated fair value upon disposition. |
|
(b) |
|
The severance charges relate to an executive employee terminated
during June 2002. The amount accrued for severance was based
upon the terminated employees employment contract, which was
paid in July 2002. |
On August 27, 2004, the Company acquired Diamond Products
International, Inc. (DPI), a designer and manufacturer of
specialized polycrystalline diamond compact (PDC) drill
bits and coring equipment for $17.0 million in cash. The
purchase price for the DPI acquisition has been allocated to the
fair values of net assets acquired. The preliminary purchase
price allocation is based upon the Companys current
estimates of respective fair values, which is subject to final
working capital adjustments. The Company expects to finalize the
determination of the fair value of assets acquired in 2005. The
value of intangible assets recognized in this acquisition was
$3.1 million for patents and $1.3 million for customer
relationships and goodwill recognized was approximately
$5.1 million, which is not deductible for tax purposes. The
patents and customer relationships are amortized over
15 years and 20 years, respectively. DPIs
results of operations are included in the Companys Drill
Bits segment from the date of acquisition.
On June 21, 2004, the Company acquired the polycrystalline
diamond compact (PDC) manufacturing business of Novatek
International, Inc. (Novatek) for $17.3 million in cash
plus a non-interest bearing note payable of $4.2 million,
with $3.0 million due June 2005 and $1.2 million due
June 2006, which has been discounted to $4.0 million based
on the Companys incremental borrowing rate of 4.75%. The
Companys management believes that this acquired PDC
technology will provide the Companys Drill Bits segment
with certain manufacturing capabilities to ensure a high quality
supply of PDC cutters and better control over cutter
technologies. The purchase price for the PDC acquisition has
been allocated to the fair values of net assets acquired. The
value of intangible assets recognized in this acquisition was
$6.7 million for patents and $0.3 million for a
covenant not to compete and there was no goodwill recognized.
The patents and covenant not to compete are amortized over
15 years and 1.5 years, respectively. The PDC
manufacturing business results of operations are included in the
Companys Drill Bits segment from the date of acquisition.
On December 20, 2002, the Company purchased the ReedHycalog
drill bits business from Schlumberger Technology Corporation and
its affiliates (Schlumberger) for $364.9 million,
consisting of $259.3 million in cash, $90 million in
Grant Prideco common stock, and $15.6 million of assumed
non-current liabilities and an accrued working capital
adjustment. The results of ReedHycalog have been included in the
financial
50
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
statements from the date of acquisition. ReedHycalog is a
leading designer, manufacturer and distributor of fixed-cutter
and roller-cone drill bits to the global oil and gas industry.
In addition to the cash and equity consideration for
ReedHycalog, the Company assumed certain of Schlumbergers
and its affiliates obligations, responsibilities,
liabilities, costs and expenses arising out of or incurred in
connection with the operation of ReedHycalog. This includes,
subject to certain exceptions, certain of Schlumbergers
and its affiliates obligations, liabilities, costs and
expenses related to the operation of its business, contractual
matters, warranty claims and various accrued liabilities,
including certain known and unknown obligations, liabilities,
costs and expenses arising or incurred prior to the closing
date. The Company believes that, as a result of
Schlumbergers indemnification obligations, the Company
will not have any material exposure for pre-closing matters.
However, the indemnification the Company received is subject to
certain thresholds and limits and the Company cannot assure that
such indemnification will be adequate.
The purchase price for ReedHycalog has been allocated to the
fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Some
allocations are based on studies and independent valuations.
The components of the purchase price and final allocation,
including the weighted average useful life of intangibles, are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangibles | |
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average | |
|
|
Amount | |
|
Useful Life | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
|
|
Final Allocation of Purchase Price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid
|
|
$ |
259,271 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Prideco Common Stock Issued
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Current Liabilities Assumed
|
|
|
13,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued Working Capital Adjustment
|
|
|
1,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Costs
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Consideration and Acquisition Costs
|
|
$ |
370,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Final Allocation of Purchase Price:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets
|
|
$ |
149,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, Plant, and Equipment
|
|
|
45,794 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Intangible Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
29,350 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
Customer Relationships
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
|
Covenant Not to Compete
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
161,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities Assumed
|
|
|
(21,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Assets Acquired
|
|
$ |
370,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill that is deductible for income tax purposes related to
this acquisition was $73.6 million.
On September 13, 2002, the Company acquired the assets of
Grey-Mak Pipe, Inc. (Grey-Mak), a company headquartered in
Casper, Wyoming that specializes in the threading of casing and
tubing and provides related accessories. The Company paid
approximately $4.8 million in cash, and goodwill recognized
in the acquisition was approximately $0.6 million.
Grey-Maks results of operations are included in the
Companys Tubular Technology and Services segment from the
date of acquisition.
51
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
On May 7, 2002, the Company acquired 65% of Rotator AS
(Rotator), a Norwegian company that manufactures control valves
and systems for the offshore oil and gas industry. On
January 28, 2003, the Company purchased the remaining 35%
interest in Rotator. Total consideration for the purchase of
Rotator was 0.3 million shares of Grant Prideco common
stock with a value of approximately $5.1 million and
$6.1 million in cash. Goodwill recognized in the
acquisition of Rotator was approximately $5.1 million, all
of which related to the 2003 step-acquisition. Rotators
results of operations and financial condition are included in
the Companys Tubular Technology and Services segment. In
September 2003, the Company sold Rotator. See Note 5 for
further discussion of the Rotator disposition.
On March 26, 2002, the Company acquired an additional 48.5%
interest in JSG, a Chinese entity engaged in the manufacture and
sale of drill pipe to the Chinese and related markets, thereby
giving the Company a 70% controlling interest in JSG. The
Company previously owned approximately 21.5% of JSG and
accounted for its investment under the equity method. The
Company paid approximately $0.5 million in cash and issued
1.3 million shares of Grant Prideco common stock for the
additional interest. Goodwill recognized in the step acquisition
of JSG was approximately $11.3 million. Subsequent to
acquiring a controlling interest, the Companys
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of JSG.
Previously recorded goodwill of $2.9 million related to the
Companys initial 21.5% investment has been reclassified
from Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated
Affiliates to Goodwill in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. JSGs results of operations are included in
the Companys Drilling Products and Services segment.
On March 26, 2002, the Company also entered into the TGP
joint venture for the manufacture of unfinished upset to grade
pipe in China, with the intent of this joint venture to supply
JSG with all of its tubular requirements. The Company currently
owns a 60% interest in the TGP joint venture and invested
approximately $5.0 million for machinery and equipment
representing the Companys contribution to the joint
venture. TGPs results of operations are included in the
Companys Drilling Products and Services segment.
The acquisitions discussed above were accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting. The cost of business acquisitions
is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition
using third-party appraisals and management estimates.
Managements estimates of fair value are based upon
assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently
uncertain. The results of operations of all acquisitions are
included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations from their
respective dates of acquisition. See Note 11 for
supplemental cash flow information concerning acquisitions.
Acquisitions discussed above, with the exception of the
ReedHycalog acquisition, are not material to the Company
individually or in the aggregate for each applicable year,
therefore pro forma information is not presented.
The following unaudited pro forma summary presents information
as if ReedHycalog had been acquired at the beginning of 2002.
The pro forma amounts include certain adjustments, including
recognition of depreciation and amortization based on the final
allocated purchase price of the properties, plant and equipment
acquired and of intangible assets; adjustment to reduce employee
benefit expenses related to benefit plans not to be continued by
Grant Prideco; increased interest expense on acquisition debt;
and
52
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
elimination of interest income that is not expected to have a
continuing impact. The pro forma amounts do not reflect any
benefits from economies which might be achieved from the
combined operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, | |
|
|
except per share data) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
853,598 |
|
Net Income Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
|
|
|
23,737 |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
17,325 |
|
Basic Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
Diluted Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
The pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of what
would have occurred if the ReedHycalog acquisition had been in
effect for the period presented and they are not intended to be
a projection of future results.
On March 4, 2004, the Company sold its Plexus Ocean Systems
(POS) rental wellhead business for $1.3 million in net
cash. The POS operations were included in the Companys
Other segment. The Company recognized a pre-tax loss of
$0.1 million on the sale, which is recorded in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations in Other Income
(Expense), Net. Revenues related to POS included in the
Other segments results for the years ended 2004, 2003 and
2002 were $0.2 million, $1.1 million and
$0.9 million respectively. Operating income (loss) related
to POS for the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002 was
$0.0 million, ($4.4 million) and $0.3 million,
respectively.
On December 2, 2003, the Company sold its Petro-Drive
operations, a provider of hammer services, for $7 million
in cash. The Petro-Drive operations were included in the
Companys Tubular Technology Services segment. The Company
recognized a pre-tax loss of $0.1 million on the sale,
which is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
in Other Income (Expense), Net.
On September 2, 2003, the Company sold Rotator for
$14.3 million in cash, which included a post-closing
working capital adjustment of $0.8 million that was
recorded in the first quarter of 2004 in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations in Other Income (Expense),
Net. Revenues related to Rotator included in the Tubular
Technology Services segments results for the years ended
2003 and 2002 were $8.7 million and $12.6 million,
respectively. Operating income related to Rotator for the years
ended 2003 and 2002 were $0.9 million and
$1.3 million, respectively.
On March 25, 2003, the Company sold Star Iron Works, Inc.
(Star), a manufacturer of drilling tools for the water well,
construction, and utility boring industries, for
$11.0 million in cash and a note valued at approximately
$0.9 million due March 2006. The gain recognized on the
sale of Star was $1.3 million, $0.8 million net of
tax, and is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations as Other Income (Expense), Net. Revenues
related to Star included in the Other segments results for
the years ended 2003 and 2002 were $3.6 million and
$19.5 million, respectively. Operating income related to
Star for the years ended 2003 and 2002 were $0.1 million
and $1.4 million, respectively.
During the third quarter of 2004, the Company sold its Bryan,
Texas Facility, along with some other fixed assets, and recorded
a gain on sale of assets of $2.2 million, which was
recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in
Other Income (Expense), Net.
53
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
6. |
Discontinued Operations |
On April 23, 2004, the Company sold the assets and business
of its Texas Arai division for approximately $20.2 million
in cash, subject to final working capital adjustments, and
recognized a loss on sale of approximately $11.7 million,
$10.4 million net of tax, which primarily related to the
goodwill allocated to this operation (see Note 10). Also
included in the loss on sale was $0.4 million related to
accelerated vesting of certain stock options. Texas Arai was
previously included in the Companys Tubular Technology and
Services segment.
Following are the condensed statements of operations from
discontinued operations related to Texas Arai:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
12,833 |
|
|
$ |
34,638 |
|
|
$ |
30,358 |
|
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
1,369 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
(990 |
) |
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
|
|
|
(479 |
) |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Operations, Net of Tax
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
Loss on Disposal, Net of Tax
|
|
|
(10,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations
|
|
$ |
(9,527 |
) |
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
(644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intercompany sales related to Texas Arai, which were eliminated
from the condensed statements of operations above, were
$2.1 million, $5.1 million, and $5.9 million for
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Intercompany profit was
immaterial for the periods presented.
Following is a condensed summary balance sheet of discontinued
operations for the assets and liabilities sold related to Texas
Arai, along with the goodwill allocated, which were included in
the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2003 (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Receivable
|
|
$ |
4,116 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
13,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
|
17,770 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
8,287 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
8,038 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
34,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts Payable
|
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
Other Current Liabilities
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
$ |
3,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
54
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
7. |
Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates |
The following table summarizes the Companys equity-method
investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Equity Income | |
|
|
|
Equity Income | |
|
|
Investment | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
Investment | |
|
(Loss) | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Voest-Alpine
|
|
$ |
38,308 |
|
|
$ |
6,413 |
|
|
$ |
36,649 |
|
|
$ |
4,028 |
|
IntelliServ
|
|
|
10,851 |
|
|
|
(4,848 |
) |
|
|
11,137 |
|
|
|
(3,567 |
) |
GPEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(939 |
) |
The Companys 50.01% owned joint venture, Voest-Alpine, is
accounted for under the equity method of accounting due to the
minority owner having substantive participating rights. Under
the limited partnership operating agreement (1) the Company
has no rights to unilaterally take any action with respect to
its investment and (2) the day to day operations of
Voest-Alpine are under the direction of a Management Board,
whose members are determined principally by the minority owner.
The Management Board is responsible for planning, production,
sales and general personal matters, which represent substantive
participating rights that overcome the presumption that the
Company should consolidate its 50.01% investment. The investment
in Voest-Alpine was $38.3 million and $36.6 million at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and is included
in the Drilling Products and Services Segment.
Summarized financial information for Voest-Alpine is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Current Assets
|
|
$ |
103,561 |
|
|
$ |
68,141 |
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
58,912 |
|
|
|
56,885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
162,473 |
|
|
$ |
125,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
$ |
58,259 |
|
|
$ |
32,176 |
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
65,827 |
|
|
|
54,482 |
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
38,387 |
|
|
|
38,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
162,473 |
|
|
$ |
125,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Net Sales
|
|
$ |
320,141 |
|
|
$ |
224,960 |
|
|
$ |
220,266 |
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
31,862 |
|
|
|
22,008 |
|
|
|
33,280 |
|
Net Income
|
|
|
13,104 |
|
|
|
7,268 |
|
|
|
16,443 |
|
Companys Equity Income
|
|
|
6,413 |
|
|
|
4,028 |
|
|
|
8,446 |
|
Dividends Received
|
|
|
8,090 |
|
|
|
13,649 |
|
|
|
16,088 |
|
The Companys equity in earnings differs from its
proportionate share of net income due to the elimination of
intercompany profit on Voest-Alpine sales to the Company. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Companys investment
in Voest-Alpine exceeded its equity in its net assets by
approximately $19.1 million and $17.5 million,
respectively, due to goodwill, tax adjustments and timing
differences.
55
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
During 2004, the Companys supply agreement with
Voest-Alpine was amended. The amended agreement provided for a
reduced minimum quantity commitment per year through
July 31, 2007, effective April 1, 2004. The amendment
also provides for a surcharge provision under which actual costs
of key raw materials in the green pipe production process will
be indexed to the April 2003 base cost and surcharges per ton
assessed accordingly for the difference. These surcharges are
phased in and did not significantly impact 2004, however, they
will be in place for 2005 forward. The contract includes a
penalty for every metric ton that a two-year average of
purchases fall below the annual purchase minimum. During 2004,
the Company met its minimum purchase requirements and the
Company currently believes it will meet its contractual
commitments for 2005 without incurring unnecessary penalties or
material unnecessary inventory positions. Purchases of tubulars
from Voest-Alpine totaled $44.3 million, $27.0 million
and $22.0 million for the years ended December 31,
2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Trade payables to
Voest-Alpine were $6.6 million and $9.3 million at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
In September 2001, the Company entered into a joint venture,
G-PEX, related to the commercialization of composite progressive
cavity motors and pumps. The Company has a 50% interest in this
joint venture and its investment is accounted for under the
equity method of accounting. G-PEX has encountered several
engineering and technical delays and as of December 31,
2003 had not delivered any products for field-testing. As a
result, the Company was uncertain that G-PEX would be able to
successfully commercialize its product line, and therefore,
concluded, in the fourth quarter of 2003, that the G-PEX
investment was other than temporarily impaired based on expected
future cash flows. A charge was recorded in 2003 to write-off
the net investment of $2.6 million and all future cash
advances to fund G-PEXs operations will be expensed. In
2004, the Company incurred $1.0 million of expenses in 2004
related to GPEX. The Company is currently in the process of
winding-up its GPEX investment.
In May 2001, the Company purchased all of the outstanding shares
of Intellipipe, Inc. common stock for 0.6 million shares of
Grant Prideco common stock with a fair value of approximately
$12.0 million. The Company, through its 100% owned
subsidiary Intellipipe, Inc., owns a 50% interest in
IntelliServ. IntelliServ is currently developing and
commercializing a drill pipe telemetry system. The
Companys investment in IntelliServ is accounted for under
the equity method of accounting and as of December 31, 2004
and 2003, the Companys investment in IntelliServ was
$10.9 million and $11.1 million, respectively, and is
included in the Drilling Products and Services Segment. For the
years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 the Company
has recorded equity losses of $4.8 million,
$3.6 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
IntelliServ is in the field trial testing and refinement stage
and has not yet introduced a product commercially.
As of December 31, 2004, the Company had no outstanding
short-term borrowings. At December 31, 2003, the Company
had short-term borrowings of $1.3 million with a weighted
average interest rate of 4.6%. Additionally, at
December 31, 2004 and 2003, there were $1.8 million
and $1.2 million, respectively, of outstanding letters of
credit not supported by the Senior Credit Facility.
56
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Senior Credit Facility:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42,857 |
|
|
Revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,320 |
|
95/8% Senior
Notes due 2007, Net of Unamortized Discount of $518 and $695 in
2004 and 2003, Respectively
|
|
|
199,482 |
|
|
|
199,305 |
|
9% Senior Notes due 2009
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
|
175,000 |
|
Capital Lease Obligations Under Various Agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
Other
|
|
|
7,472 |
|
|
|
3,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
381,954 |
|
|
|
436,638 |
|
Less: Current Portion of Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
4,181 |
|
|
|
9,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
377,773 |
|
|
$ |
426,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of scheduled long-term debt
maturities by year (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
2006
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
2007
|
|
|
199,705 |
|
2008
|
|
|
234 |
|
2009
|
|
|
175,245 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
381,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with the ReedHycalog acquisition in December 2002,
the Company entered into a new four-year $240 million
senior secured credit facility (Senior Credit Facility) with a
syndicate of U.S. and foreign banks. The Senior Credit Facility
was comprised of a $50 million term loan and a
$190 million revolving credit facility, which includes up
to $20 million for letter of credits.
The U.S. credit facility is guaranteed by Grant Prideco,
Inc. and all domestic subsidiaries and is secured by
substantially all of the Companys U.S. assets,
including U.S. inventories, equipment, receivables, owned
real property and 65% of the stock of certain foreign
subsidiaries. The Canadian credit facility is guaranteed by
Grant Prideco, Inc. and all U.S. subsidiaries and is
secured by substantially all of the Companys
U.S. assets and certain Canadian inventories, equipment,
receivables, owned real property and 65% of the stock of certain
foreign subsidiaries.
Amounts outstanding under the Senior Credit Facility accrue
interest at a variable rate based on either the U.S. prime
rate (plus 0.75% to 1.75% depending on the Companys
leverage ratio) or LIBOR (plus 1.75% to 2.75% depending on the
Companys leverage ratio) for the U.S. denominated
advances or a variable rate based on the Canadian prime rate
(plus 0.75) or the applicable rate for Canadian bankers
acceptances, for Canadian denominated advances. Interest on
outstanding borrowings is payable monthly or, with respect to
LIBOR borrowings, either quarterly or at the end of the
applicable LIBOR period. The U.S. revolving credit
57
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
facility also provides the Company with availability for letters
of credit. The Company is required to comply with various
affirmative and negative covenants, which will limit the
Companys ability to incur new debt, make certain
investments and acquisitions, sell assets, grant liens, and take
other actions. The Company is also subject to financial
covenants that require the Company to limit its capital
expenditures and, under certain circumstances, require the
Company to maintain a certain minimum fixed charge coverage
ratio. As of December 31, 2004, the Company was in
compliance with the various covenants under the Senior Credit
Facility.
As of December 31, 2004, the Company did not have any
outstanding borrowings under the Senior Credit Facility and
$7.7 million of revolver availability had been reserved to
support outstanding letters of credit. Once the term loan was
repaid, it no longer represented availability under the Senior
Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had
borrowed $57.2 million under the Senior Credit Facility, of
which $42.9 million relates to the term loan,
$14.3 million relates to the revolving credit facility and
$5.9 million had been used to support outstanding letters
of credit. Net borrowing availability was $168.0 million
and $122.3 million as of December 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
In December 2002, the Company issued $175.0 million
principal amount of 9% Senior Notes Due 2009
(9% Senior Notes). Net proceeds from the issuance of
$170.4 million were used, along with certain other funds,
to fund the cash portion of the ReedHycalog acquisition.
Interest is payable June 15 and December 15 of each year. After
December 15, 2006, the Company may redeem all or part of
the 9% Senior Notes at any time at a price of 100% of their
principal amount plus an applicable premium and accrued and
unpaid interest to the redemption date. The 9% Senior Notes
are guaranteed by all of the Companys domestic
subsidiaries. The indenture governing the 9% Senior Notes
contains various covenants customary in such instruments,
including restrictions to incur new debt, pay dividends, sell
assets, grant liens and other related items.
|
|
|
95/8% Senior
Notes Due 2007 |
In December 2000, the Company issued $200.0 million
principal amount of
95/8% Senior
Notes Due 2007
(95/8% Senior
Notes). The
95/8% Senior
Notes were issued at a discount to yield an effective interest
rate of
93/4%.
Interest is payable June 1 and December 1 of each
year. The Company may redeem all or part of the
95/8% Senior
Notes at any time at a price of 100% of their principal amount
plus an applicable premium and accrued and unpaid interest to
the redemption date. The
95/8% Senior
Notes are guaranteed by all of the Companys domestic
subsidiaries. The indenture governing the
95/8% Senior
Notes contains various covenants customary in such instruments,
including restrictions to incur new debt, pay dividends, sell
assets, grant liens and other related items.
In the event there is a payment default under the Senior Credit
Facility, the 9% and
95/8% Senior
Notes could come due. As of December 31, 2004, the Company
was in compliance with the various covenants under the 9% and
95/8% Senior
Notes agreements.
|
|
10. |
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted
SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible
Assets. SFAS No. 142 provides for a two-step
transitional goodwill impairment test with respect to existing
goodwill. The Companys reporting units under
SFAS No. 142 are as follows: 1) Drilling Products
and Services, 2) Drill Bits, 3) Tubular Technology and
Services and 4) Other. Completion of the annual impairment
test for 2002, upon adoption of SFAS No. 142,
indicated the carrying value of the Other reporting unit
exceeded its fair value and the Company recorded a goodwill
impairment loss totaling $9.3 million, $6.4 million
net of tax. This charge had no impact on cash flows and was
recorded as a cumulative effect of a change in accounting
principle in the Consolidated Statements of Operations effective
January 1, 2002. The
58
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
fair value of the Other reporting unit was determined using a
combination of discounted cash flow projections and comparable
company market value multiples. The circumstances leading to the
goodwill impairment in the Other reporting unit were overall
weak market conditions in the telecommunications industry, which
contributed to declining revenues and profitability, and a
reduction in the estimated future expected performance of this
reporting unit.
During 2003, the Company transferred the Plexus International
(Plexus) division from the Tubular Technology and Services
reporting unit to the Other reporting unit which had acquired
goodwill of $2.5 million. Plexus, which was acquired in
2001 (see Note 4), was never integrated into the Tubular
Technology and Services reporting unit after its acquisition and
the benefits of its goodwill were never realized in the Tubular
Technology and Services reporting unit. Additionally, during
2003 the Company sold its Star, Petro-Drive and Rotator
businesses and goodwill allocated to these sales of
$1.5 million, $1.6 million and $4.8 million,
respectively, were based upon the proportional relative fair
market values of the businesses sold to their respective
reporting unit that was retained. See Note 5 for further
discussion of these dispositions.
During 2004, the Company sold its Texas Arai operations.
Goodwill allocated to this sale of $8.0 million was based
upon the proportional relative fair market value of Texas Arai
to the Tubular Technology and Services reporting unit that was
retained. See Note 6 for further discussion of this
discontinued operation.
The Company performs its annual test for potential goodwill
impairment as of October 1st of each year or when
events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than
not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying
amount. For 2003, the annual impairment test indicated that the
fair value of the Other reporting unit was below its carrying
value and a goodwill impairment loss was recorded totaling
$2.5 million, $1.6 million net of tax. For 2004, the
Company completed its annual assessment, which indicated no
existence of impairment. The carrying amount of goodwill by
reporting unit was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Products | |
|
|
|
Tubular Technology | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Services | |
|
Drill Bits | |
|
and Services | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Balance, December 31, 2002
|
|
$ |
125,199 |
|
|
$ |
155,983 |
|
|
$ |
111,367 |
|
|
$ |
1,534 |
|
|
$ |
394,083 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,823 |
|
|
|
3,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,870 |
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,443 |
) |
|
|
(1,534 |
) |
|
|
(7,977 |
) |
Translation and Other Adjustments
|
|
|
4,259 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
(2,800 |
) |
|
|
2,500 |
|
|
|
4,468 |
|
Impairment Loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2003
|
|
|
129,458 |
|
|
|
162,315 |
|
|
|
105,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,944 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,089 |
|
Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,038 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,038 |
) |
Translation and Other Adjustments
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
(671 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2004
|
|
$ |
130,127 |
|
|
$ |
166,733 |
|
|
$ |
97,133 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
393,993 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets of $43.8 million and $36.3 million,
including accumulated amortization of $10.3 million and
$7.3 million, as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, are recorded at cost and are amortized on a
straight-line basis. The Companys intangible assets
primarily consist of patents, covenants not to compete,
trademarks, technology licenses and customer relationships that
are amortized over the definitive terms of the related agreement
or the Companys estimate of the useful life if there are
no definitive terms. See Note 4 for
59
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
discussion of newly acquired intangibles. During 2003, the
Company recorded an impairment on licenses related to its Plexus
division of $1.3 million, net of $0.2 million of
accumulated amortization. The following table shows the
Companys intangible assets by asset category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004 | |
|
December 31, 2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Gross | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Net | |
|
Gross | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
Net | |
|
|
Intangibles | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Intangibles | |
|
Intangibles | |
|
Amortization | |
|
Intangibles | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Patents
|
|
$ |
43,380 |
|
|
$ |
(5,908 |
) |
|
$ |
37,472 |
|
|
$ |
33,160 |
|
|
$ |
(2,877 |
) |
|
$ |
30,283 |
|
Technology Licenses
|
|
|
1,438 |
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
915 |
|
Customer Relationships
|
|
|
4,600 |
|
|
|
(335 |
) |
|
|
4,265 |
|
|
|
3,300 |
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
3,133 |
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
(815 |
) |
|
|
795 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
1,186 |
|
Covenants Not To Compete
|
|
|
3,125 |
|
|
|
(2,790 |
) |
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
4,150 |
|
|
|
(3,417 |
) |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
54,153 |
|
|
$ |
(10,346 |
) |
|
$ |
43,807 |
|
|
$ |
43,508 |
|
|
$ |
(7,258 |
) |
|
$ |
36,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets for the years
ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was
$4.4 million, $4.1 million, and $0.9 million,
respectively. Excluding the impact of future acquisitions,
estimated annual amortization expense related to existing
intangible assets for years 2005 through 2009 is expected to be
approximately $4.4 million, $4.0 million,
$3.7 million, $3.3 million and $3.2 million,
respectively.
|
|
11. |
Supplemental Cash Flow Information |
Cash paid for interest and income taxes (net of refunds) was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Interest Paid
|
|
$ |
38,241 |
|
|
$ |
41,168 |
|
|
$ |
26,068 |
|
Income Taxes Paid, Net of Refunds
|
|
|
22,369 |
|
|
|
13,530 |
|
|
|
21,139 |
|
The following summarizes investing activities relating to
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Fair Value of Assets, Net of Cash Acquired
|
|
$ |
38,248 |
|
|
$ |
(2,826 |
) |
|
$ |
263,061 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,089 |
|
|
|
8,870 |
|
|
|
171,955 |
|
Fair Value of Liabilities Assumed
|
|
|
(9,504 |
) |
|
|
2,228 |
|
|
|
(58,933 |
) |
Grant Prideco Common Stock Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110,911 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Consideration, Net of Cash Acquired
|
|
$ |
33,833 |
|
|
$ |
8,272 |
|
|
$ |
265,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The acquisition information for 2003 primarily relates to fair
value adjustments of net assets acquired in the ReedHycalog
acquisition in December 2002. Additionally, in June 2004 the
Company entered into a $4.0 million non-interest bearing
note in connection with the PDC manufacturing business
acquisition (see Note 4 for further discussion).
60
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
12. |
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
|
|
Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans |
The Company has stock option plans pursuant to which directors,
officers and other key employees may be granted restricted stock
and stock options to purchase shares of Grant Prideco Common
Stock (Common Stock). Stock options are typically granted at the
fair market value on the date of grant.
The Company has in effect a 2000 Employee Stock Option and
Restricted Stock Plan (2000 Plan), a 2000 Non-Employee Director
Stock Option Plan (Director Plan) and a 2001 Employee Stock
Option and Restricted Stock Plan (2001 Plan). Under these plans,
restricted stock or stock options to purchase up to an aggregate
of 15.8 million shares of Common Stock may be granted. At
December 31, 2004, approximately 3.4 million shares
were available for granting under such plans. Stock options and
restricted stock vest one to four years from the date of grant
and expire ten to fourteen years from the date of grant.
Restricted shares are subject to certain restrictions on
ownership and transferability when granted.
The Company also has stock options granted to employees and
directors of Weatherford that were granted prior to September
1998. Under the terms of Grant Pridecos spinoff from
Weatherford, these employees and directors were granted an equal
number of options to purchase Common Stock. The Company granted
a total of 1,247,255 stock options related to the
Weatherford grants prior to September 1998. As of
December 31, 2004, options outstanding related to the
Weatherford plans prior to September 1998 were 530,267.
Compensation expense of $3.3 million and $0.3 million
was recognized in 2004 and 2003, respectively, primarily related
to accelerated vesting of certain stock option awards.
A summary of the status of the Companys stock options
under the 2000 Plan, the Director Plan and the 2001 Plan along
with the Weatherford grants prior to September 1998 as of
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 and the changes during the
year ended on those dates are presented below (actual amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number of | |
|
Exercise | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
Shares | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Outstanding at the Beginning of the Year
|
|
|
12,510,605 |
|
|
$ |
11.69 |
|
|
|
12,330,533 |
|
|
$ |
11.81 |
|
|
|
12,305,863 |
|
|
$ |
11.80 |
|
Options Granted During the Year
|
|
|
713,500 |
|
|
|
13.61 |
|
|
|
993,500 |
|
|
|
10.72 |
|
|
|
427,002 |
|
|
|
10.79 |
|
Options Exercised
|
|
|
(2,998,289 |
) |
|
|
8.69 |
|
|
|
(96,428 |
) |
|
|
8.29 |
|
|
|
(168,832 |
) |
|
|
6.95 |
|
Options Canceled
|
|
|
(131,012 |
) |
|
|
10.22 |
|
|
|
(717,000 |
) |
|
|
12.87 |
|
|
|
(233,500 |
) |
|
|
12.84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at the End of the Year
|
|
|
10,094,804 |
|
|
$ |
12.74 |
|
|
|
12,510,605 |
|
|
$ |
11.69 |
|
|
|
12,330,533 |
|
|
$ |
11.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at the End of the Year
|
|
|
5,648,654 |
|
|
$ |
15.54 |
|
|
|
6,437,883 |
|
|
$ |
13.66 |
|
|
|
3,039,883 |
|
|
$ |
7.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding at December 31, 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding | |
|
Options Exercisable | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
Average | |
|
Average | |
|
|
|
Average | |
|
|
Number | |
|
Remaining | |
|
Exercise | |
|
Number | |
|
Exercise | |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
Outstanding | |
|
Life (Years) | |
|
Price | |
|
Exercisable | |
|
Price | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
$2.47 - $7.41
|
|
|
3,476,241 |
|
|
|
9.36 |
|
|
$ |
6.84 |
|
|
|
1,008,591 |
|
|
$ |
6.11 |
|
$8.35 - $14.19
|
|
|
2,768,296 |
|
|
|
9.75 |
|
|
|
11.57 |
|
|
|
849,796 |
|
|
|
11.51 |
|
$14.55 - $19.99
|
|
|
3,850,267 |
|
|
|
8.45 |
|
|
|
18.90 |
|
|
|
3,790,267 |
|
|
|
18.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,094,804 |
|
|
|
9.12 |
|
|
$ |
12.74 |
|
|
|
5,648,654 |
|
|
$ |
15.54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of stock options granted by the Company during
2004, 2003 and 2002 was estimated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model, with the following weighted average
assumptions (see Note 1 for pro forma effect of applying
fair value methodology):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Weighted Average Fair Value of Stock Options Granted
|
|
$ |
7.03 |
|
|
$ |
5.47 |
|
|
$ |
5.88 |
|
Valuation Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected Option Term (Years)
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
Expected Volatility
|
|
|
42.50 |
% |
|
|
41.14 |
% |
|
|
43.00 |
% |
|
Expected Dividend Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk Free Interest Rate
|
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
4.58 |
% |
|
|
|
Other Stock-Based Compensation |
In June 2002 and January 2004, awards were granted under the
2000 Plan to executive officers for 500,000 and
60,000 shares of restricted stock, respectively.
Additionally, compensation expense of $1.1 million was
recognized in 2003 related to accelerated vesting of a 2001
restricted stock award for a member of the Board of Directors.
In February 2004, the Company awarded 330,550 shares of
restricted stock to officers and other key employees under the
2000 Plan. The restricted shares vest on the ninth anniversary
of the date of grant (February 2013), however there is an
accelerated vesting schedule based on the achievement of certain
predetermined performance metrics. Beginning with the third
anniversary date of the grant through the eighth anniversary
date, the performance metrics are evaluated annually and early
vesting will occur for meeting the performance goals. Restricted
shares are subject to certain restrictions on ownership and
transferability when granted. During 2004, the Company recorded
compensation expense of $0.7 million related to these
shares.
Also included in the February 2004 restricted stock award was a
tax gross up bonus component based on the incremental tax rate
needed to reimburse the employees for the federal income taxes
resulting from the vesting of the restricted shares. As the tax
gross-up bonus component will change based on the share price at
the vesting date, the estimated cash liability to the employees
is considered to be a variable award under APB No. 25 and
therefore the liability is required to be adjusted as the stock
price changes. The estimated ultimate tax liability based on the
market value of common stock at December 31, 2004 was
$4.4 million based on the stock price at that date, and is
being recognized ratably over the expected vesting period.
During 2004, the Company recorded compensation expense of
$0.7 million associated with this liability.
62
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
A summary of the restricted stock awards and the amounts
recognized as compensation expense for the years ended
December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except share amounts) | |
Shares Awarded
|
|
|
390,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Weighted Average Fair Value of Restricted Stock Granted
|
|
$ |
13.59 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
15.10 |
|
Compensation Expense Recognized
|
|
$ |
3,510 |
|
|
$ |
4,014 |
|
|
$ |
2,135 |
|
|
|
|
Executive Deferred Compensation Plans |
In April 2000, Weatherford spun off Grant Prideco to its
stockholders as an independent, publicly traded company.
Weatherford maintains various Executive Deferred Compensation
Stock Ownership Plans (the Weatherford EDC Plans).
Prior to the spinoff from Weatherford, participants in the
Weatherford EDC Plans had a right to receive shares of
Weatherford common stock upon termination of their employment
based on the deferred amounts placed in their individual
accounts. Under the Weatherford EDC Plans, in the event of a
dividend or special distribution to the shareholders of
Weatherford, the accounts of the employees are to represent a
right to receive the consideration provided through the dividend
or special distribution. As a result, participants in the
Weatherford EDC Plans were entitled to receive shares of both
Weatherford common stock and the Companys Common Stock in
respect of amounts deferred by the participants prior to the
spinoff. Accordingly, a portion of the deferred compensation
liability recorded by Weatherford was allocated to Grant Prideco
based on the relative market value of the Common Stock to the
relative market value of the Weatherford common stock on the
date of spinoff. The liability transferred to Grant Prideco was
approximately $4.2 million and is included in
Deferred Compensation Obligation in Stockholders
Equity. The Company has reserved 519,000 shares of
Common Stock in settlement of this obligation. As of
December 31, 2004, 352,123 shares remain. Settlements
under the Weatherford EDC Plans will be in Weatherford common
stock and the Companys Common Stock.
At the time of the spinoff from Weatherford, Grant Prideco
established separate Executive Deferred Compensation Stock
Ownership Plans (the Grant EDC Plans) in which
certain Grant Prideco employees and directors participate. The
terms of the Grant EDC Plans are substantially similar to the
Weatherford EDC Plans. A separate trust (the Trust)
has been established by Grant Prideco following the spinoff to
fund the benefits under the Grant EDC Plans. The funds provided
to the Trust are invested in Common Stock through open market
purchases by a trustee independent of the Company. The assets of
the Trust are available to satisfy the claims of all general
creditors of Grant Prideco in the event of a bankruptcy or
insolvency. Settlements under the Grant EDC Plans will be in
Common Stock. Accordingly, the Common Stock held by the Trust is
included in Stockholders Equity as Treasury Stock,
at Cost and was approximately $7.8 million at
December 31, 2004.
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
In 2003, the Companys Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP) was approved and the Company reserved
1.2 million shares of Common Stock for issuance under the
ESPP. Under the ESPP, eligible employees may elect to withhold
up to 10% of their earnings, subject to certain limitations.
Each one-year offering period commences on
January 1st of each year, except the initial offering
period which commenced on July 1, 2003, and concludes on
December 31st. The price at which the Common Stock may be
purchased under the ESPP is equal to 85% of the lower of the
fair market value of the Common Stock on the commencement date
or the last trading day of each offering period. In January
2005, there were approximately 171,000 shares sold through
the ESPP for 2004.
63
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
13. |
Retirement and Employee Benefit Plans |
|
|
|
Defined Contribution Plan |
The Company has defined contribution plans covering certain of
its employees. The Companys expenses related to these
plans totaled $4.0 million, $2.4 million and
$1.2 million in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
On December 20, 2002, the Company assumed sponsorship of
two defined benefit pension plans in connection with the
ReedHycalog acquisition (see Note 4).
As part of the purchase agreement with Schlumberger, Grant
Prideco acquired the Reed Hourly Pension Plan (the
U.S. Plan). The U.S. Plan covers approximately
200 employees and provides a defined benefit based on a
fixed dollar amount per year of service. The fixed dollar amount
is defined in the union contract and is subject to change.
|
|
|
Obligations and Funded Status |
The following table reflects information concerning the change
in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and reconciliation
of funded status. The Companys benefits are presented and
computed as of and for the twelve-month period ended on the
December 31 measurement date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Change in Benefit Obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
13,675 |
|
|
$ |
12,658 |
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(913 |
) |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$ |
13,377 |
|
|
$ |
13,675 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
8,796 |
|
|
$ |
9,372 |
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(486 |
) |
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
Administrative expenses
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
Exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$ |
9,165 |
|
|
$ |
8,797 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status at End of Year
|
|
|
(4,212 |
) |
|
|
(4,878 |
) |
Unrecognized Net Actuarial Loss
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized at end of year
|
|
$ |
(4,208 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
$ |
(4,212 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,878 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized at end of year
|
|
$ |
(4,208 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The accumulated benefit obligation was $13.4 million and
$13.7 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
The following table provides information related to the
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of the U.S. Plan
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Projected Benefit Obligation
|
|
$ |
13,377 |
|
|
$ |
13,675 |
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
13,377 |
|
|
|
13,675 |
|
Fair Value of Plan Assets
|
|
|
9,165 |
|
|
|
8,797 |
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Service Cost
|
|
$ |
367 |
|
|
$ |
413 |
|
Interest Cost
|
|
|
734 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets
|
|
|
(560 |
) |
|
|
(755 |
) |
Administration Expenses
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|
|
$ |
592 |
|
|
$ |
574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company is required to recognize a minimum liability if the
U.S. Plan has an accumulated benefit obligation in excess
of plan assets. Adjustments to the minimum liability are
included in other comprehensive income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Increase (Decrease) in Minimum Liability Included in Other
Comprehensive Income
|
|
$ |
(1,014 |
) |
|
$ |
1,018 |
|
Assumptions used to determine net benefit obligations for the
fiscal year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.78 |
% |
|
|
6.15 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
6.15 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
6.58 |
% |
|
|
8.50 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
To develop the expected return on plan assets assumption, Grant
Prideco considered the current level of expected returns on
various asset classes. The expected return for each asset class
was then weighted based on the target asset allocation to
develop the expected return on plan assets assumption for the
portfolio.
65
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The following table provides the target and actual asset
allocations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual | |
|
|
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
|
|
| |
Asset Category |
|
Target | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
Equity Securities
|
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
68 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Fixed Income
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All of the U.S. Plan assets were invested in cash as of
December 31, 2003 due to transition from the acquisition of
the plan.
The primary investment objective is to ensure, over the
long-term life of the pension plans, an adequate pool of
sufficiently liquid assets to support the benefit obligations to
participants, retirees and beneficiaries. In meeting this
objective, the pension plan seeks to achieve a high level of
investment return consistent with a prudent level of portfolio
risk. Investment objectives are long-term in nature covering
typical market cycles of three to five years. Any shortfall of
investment performance compared to investment objectives should
be explainable in terms of general economic and capital market
conditions.
The Company expects to contribute $0.8 million to the
U.S. Plan in 2005.
The following table provides the expected benefit payments for
the next ten years:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending |
|
Payments | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In | |
|
|
thousands) | |
2005
|
|
$ |
651 |
|
2006
|
|
|
764 |
|
2007
|
|
|
753 |
|
2008
|
|
|
911 |
|
2009
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Next 5 years
|
|
|
5,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
10,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
As part of the purchase agreement with Schlumberger, Grant
Prideco acquired the Hycalog Retirement Death Benefit Scheme
(the Scheme). The Scheme covers approximately 115 employees
and provides pensions on a defined benefits basis. The Scheme is
closed, with no future benefits accruing.
66
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
Obligations and Funded Status |
The following table reflects information concerning the change
in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and reconciliation
of funded status. The Companys benefits are presented and
computed as of and for the twelve-month period ended on the
December 31 measurement date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Change in Benefit Obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
21,480 |
|
|
$ |
11,155 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
863 |
|
|
|
841 |
|
|
Employee contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,688 |
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
(1,439 |
) |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
|
$ |
20,648 |
|
|
$ |
21,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Plan Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
17,956 |
|
|
$ |
9,230 |
|
|
Actual return on plan assets
|
|
|
3,429 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
Employer contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,526 |
|
|
Employee contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
$ |
21,129 |
|
|
$ |
17,956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded Status at End of Year
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
(3,524 |
) |
Unrecognized Net Actuarial Gain
|
|
|
(5,120 |
) |
|
|
(712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized at end of year
|
|
$ |
(4,639 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts Recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued benefit liability
|
|
$ |
(4,639 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized at end of year
|
|
$ |
(4,639 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accumulated benefit obligation was $20.6 million and
$21.5 million as of December 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
The following table provides information related to the
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
Projected Benefit Obligation
|
|
$ |
21,480 |
|
Accumulated Benefit Obligation
|
|
|
21,480 |
|
Fair Value of Plan Assets
|
|
|
17,956 |
|
For 2004, the fair value of plan assets exceeded the accumulated
benefit obligation, therefore, no amounts are presented above
for the current year.
67
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Interest Cost
|
|
$ |
863 |
|
|
$ |
841 |
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets
|
|
|
(927 |
) |
|
|
(692 |
) |
Amortization of Net Actuarial (Gain) Loss
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost (Benefit)
|
|
$ |
(357 |
) |
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2003, as a result of a legal dispute regarding the benefit
accruals of the Scheme, Grant Prideco recognized an additional
$8.7 million for the Scheme under purchase accounting. In
2004, the Company reached a settlement with Schlumberger on
various outstanding issues relating to the purchase agreement,
including but not limited to pension plan funding. As the
settlement of the pension funding issue was not directly linked
to the purchase price, it was recorded to the income statement
and not as an adjustment to goodwill. The settlement was
recorded as a $3.2 million reduction to pension expense in
2004. See Note 4 for further discussion on the Reedhycalog
acquisition.
Assumptions used to determine net benefit obligations for the
fiscal year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
4.75 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Discount rate
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
5.50 |
% |
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
6.75 |
% |
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
This Schemes assets are presently invested wholly in UK
Government Bonds, therefore the expected return on plan assets
was derived from the expected yield on those bonds.
68
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
For 2004 and 2003, 100% of the Schemes assets were
allocated to the fixed income investments.
The Company does not expect to contribute to the Scheme in 2005.
The following table provides the expected benefit payments for
the next ten years:
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ending |
|
Payments | |
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2005
|
|
$ |
235 |
|
2006
|
|
|
262 |
|
2007
|
|
|
277 |
|
2008
|
|
|
283 |
|
2009
|
|
|
307 |
|
Next 5 years
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
3,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
14. Income Taxes
The domestic and foreign components of income (loss) before
income taxes consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Domestic
|
|
$ |
44,975 |
|
|
$ |
(42,768 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,058 |
) |
Foreign
|
|
|
56,771 |
|
|
|
54,880 |
|
|
|
29,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Before Income Taxes
|
|
$ |
101,746 |
|
|
$ |
12,112 |
|
|
$ |
24,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the provision for income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal and state income taxes
|
|
$ |
(460 |
) |
|
$ |
(500 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,441 |
) |
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(11,154 |
) |
|
|
(19,872 |
) |
|
|
(9,450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,614 |
) |
|
|
(20,372 |
) |
|
|
(10,891 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal and state income taxes
|
|
|
(14,879 |
) |
|
|
16,136 |
|
|
|
5,870 |
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(5,217 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2,553 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,096 |
) |
|
|
16,133 |
|
|
|
3,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Income Tax Provision(a)
|
|
$ |
(31,710 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes the deferred tax benefit of $2.9 million relating
to the cumulative effect of the accounting change for the year
ended 2002 (see Note 10). Also excludes $0.9 million,
($0.3) million and |
69
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
$0.3 million of deferred taxes from the income (loss) from
discontinued operations for the years ended 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively (see Note 6). |
The following is a reconciliation of income taxes at the
U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to the effective
provision for income taxes reflected in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Provision for Income Taxes at Statutory Rates
|
|
$ |
(35,610 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,510 |
) |
Effect of Foreign Income Tax, Net
|
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(975 |
) |
Change in Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
(4,523 |
) |
|
|
(4,300 |
) |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
Preferred Supplier Credit
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
955 |
|
Extraterritorial Income Benefit
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
3,032 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
|
|
3,144 |
|
State and Local Income Taxes Net of U.S. Federal Income Tax
Benefit
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
(500 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
Amortization of Restricted Stock Award
|
|
|
(2,220 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Permanent Items
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
$ |
(31,710 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(7,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between
the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount
in the financial statements. The measurement of deferred tax
assets and liabilities is based on enacted tax laws and rates
currently in effect in each of the jurisdictions which the
Company has operations. Additionally, applicable
U.S. income and foreign withholding taxes have been
provided on certain undistributed earnings of the Companys
international subsidiaries that are not intended to be
reinvested indefinitely outside of the United States.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are classified as current or
non-current according to the classification of the related asset
or liability for financial reporting.
70
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The components of the net deferred tax assets
(liabilities) and the related valuation allowances were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended | |
|
|
December 31, | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Deferred Tax Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign tax credits
|
|
$ |
23,393 |
|
|
$ |
14,365 |
|
|
Domestic and foreign operating losses
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
|
|
7,910 |
|
|
Accrued liabilities and reserves
|
|
|
17,951 |
|
|
|
11,726 |
|
|
Inventory basis differences
|
|
|
4,778 |
|
|
|
11,727 |
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,250 |
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated subs
|
|
|
3,164 |
|
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
50,653 |
|
|
|
52,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangibles
|
|
|
(6,176 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment and other
|
|
|
(36,042 |
) |
|
|
(34,776 |
) |
|
Tax on non-repatriated foreign income
|
|
|
(5,510 |
) |
|
|
(6,345 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(47,728 |
) |
|
|
(41,121 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign tax credits
|
|
|
(13,924 |
) |
|
|
(9,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total valuation allowance
|
|
|
(13,924 |
) |
|
|
(9,400 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)
|
|
$ |
(10,999 |
) |
|
$ |
2,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had United
States net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards for tax
purposes of approximately $3.2 million and
$23.8 million, respectively, which will expire in the year
2023. At December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company had
foreign tax credit carryforwards, net of allowances, of
$8.2 million and $5.7 million, respectively, which
will expire in the years 2011 through 2014. At December 31,
2004 and 2003, the Company had a valuation allowance of
$13.9 million and $9.4 million, respectively, due to
the uncertainty of utilization of foreign tax credits to reduce
the U.S. income tax liability. At December 31, 2004
and 2003, the Company had United States alternative minimum tax
credits of $0.8 million and $0.4 million respectively,
which carryover indefinitely. During 2003, $3.1 million was
reclassed from another deferred liability to the valuation
allowance. The Company has not recorded a deferred income tax
liability that would result from the distribution of earnings
from certain foreign subsidiaries if those earnings were
actually repatriated. The Company intends to indefinitely
reinvest certain undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries
located in Italy, Canada, China, Mexico, Singapore, Venezuela
and the United Kingdom. In the event that the balance of such
earnings were to be distributed a one-time tax charge to the
Companys consolidated results of operations of up to
approximately $14.9 million could occur. At
December 31, 2004 and 2003 the total amount of foreign
earnings indefinitely reinvested is approximately
$34.2 million and $7.2 million, respectively. Deferred
taxes at December 31, 2003 include an adjustment related to
the acquisition of ReedHycalog.
Certain subsidiaries operating in China qualify for a tax
holiday. These tax holidays resulted in a $2.0 million
reduction in tax expense in 2004 or less than $0.02 per
share, $1.0 million in 2003 or less than $0.01 per
share and $0.9 million in 2002 or less than $0.01 per
share and they expire in 2005 and 2008.
71
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The calculation of the Companys tax liabilities involves
dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax
regulations in a multitude of jurisdictions. The Company
recognizes potential liabilities and records tax liabilities for
anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax
jurisdictions based on its estimate of whether, and the extent
to which, additional taxes will be due. The Company adjusts
these reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances;
however, due to the complexity of some of these uncertainties,
the ultimate resolution may result in a payment that is
different from its current estimate of the tax liabilities. If
the Companys estimate of tax liabilities proves to be less
than the ultimate assessment, an additional charge to expense
would result. If payment of these amounts ultimately proves to
be less than the recorded amounts, the reversal of the
liabilities may result in income tax benefits being recognized
in the period when the Company determines the liabilities are no
longer necessary. Substantially all of these potential tax
liabilities are recorded in Other Long-Term
Liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as payment
is not expected within one year. During 2004, the Company
reversed approximately $1.2 million primarily related to
state taxes and settled an audit of its Austrian joint venture
for approximately $0.5 million more than was in the reserve.
During 2004, certain foreign countries in which the Company has
operations reduced their statutory tax rates. The effect on the
deferred tax balance was approximately $0.6 million.
The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act)
enacted on October 22, 2004 provides for a temporary 85%
dividends received deduction on certain foreign earnings
repatriated during a one-year period. The deduction would result
in an approximate 5.25% federal tax rate on the repatriated
foreign earnings. To qualify for the deduction, certain criteria
in the Act must be satisfied. The Company is in the process of
evaluating whether it will repatriate foreign earnings under the
repatriation provisions of the Act and if so the amount that
will be repatriated. Through December 31, 2004, the Company
has not provided deferred taxes on certain foreign earnings
because such earnings were intended to be indefinitely
reinvested outside the United States. Whether the Company will
take advantage of this provision depends on a number of factors
including reviewing future Congressional guidance before a
decision can be made. Until that time, the Company will make no
change in its current intention to indefinitely reinvest certain
earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. If the Company were to
repatriate these earnings, a one-time tax benefit to the
Companys consolidated results of operations of up to
approximately $2.1 million could occur.
15. Disputes, Litigation, and Contingencies
|
|
|
Litigation and Other Disputes |
The Company is aware of various disputes and potential claims
and is a party in various litigation involving claims against
the Company, some of which are covered by insurance. Based on
facts currently known, the Company believes that the ultimate
liability, if any, which may result from known claims, disputes,
and pending litigation would not have a material adverse effect
on the Companys financial position or its results of
operations with or without consideration of insurance coverage.
The Company is predominantly self-insured through an insurance
policy for employee health insurance claims and is self-insured
for workers compensation claims for certain of its
employees. The amounts in excess of the self-insured levels are
fully insured. Self-insurance accruals are based on claims filed
and an estimate for significant claims incurred but not
reported. Although the Company believes that adequate reserves
have been provided for expected liabilities arising from its
self-insured obligations, it is reasonably possible that
managements estimates of these liabilities will change
over the near term as circumstances develop.
72
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
The Company is committed under various operating leases, which
primarily relate to office space and equipment. Total lease
expense incurred under operating leases was approximately
$11.9 million, $11.3 million, and $8.9 million
for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002,
respectively. Future minimum rental commitments under
non-cancellable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
$ |
9,992 |
|
2006
|
|
|
7,833 |
|
2007
|
|
|
5,917 |
|
2008
|
|
|
5,345 |
|
2009
|
|
|
2,553 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
15,813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
47,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
At the time of the December 1998 acquisition by the Company of
93% of T.F. de Mexico, the Company entered into a 30-year supply
contract with Tubos de Acero de Mexico, S.A. (TAMSA). Under the
supply contract, TAMSA has been given the right to supply
tubulars for the Companys Mexican drill pipe operations as
long as the prices are on a competitive basis. This supply
agreement does not obligate the Company to make purchases from
TAMSA for any location other than Mexico. The supply agreement
also does not restrict the Companys ability to utilize
tubulars manufactured by its affiliates, including Voest-Alpine.
In connection with the spinoff, the Company entered into a
preferred supplier agreement with Weatherford in which
Weatherford agreed to purchase at least 70% of its requirements
of drill stem products from the Company, subject to certain
exceptions. In return, the Company agreed to sell those products
at prices not greater than that at which it sells to similarly
situated customers, and the Company provided Weatherford a
$30.0 million credit towards the purchase of those
products. During 2003, the Company extended the term of this
contract by two years and reduced the unused preferred supplier
credit balance by $6.6 million. The effect of the reduction
in the supplier credit was a reduction in the accrued liability
as a credit to other income. Such adjustment is reflected in
Other Income (Expense), Net in the Consolidated
Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31,
2003. At December 31, 2004, the remaining credit balance
was $4.1 million, which is classified as Other
Accrued Liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated
Balance Sheets. Weatherford purchased approximately
$25.1 million of drill stem products from the Company
during 2004. Weatherford also purchased API tubing and accessory
threading services from the Company aggregating
$3.9 million during 2004.
Until April 14, 2000, the Company was a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Weatherford. The Company was spun off from
Weatherford on April 14, 2000, through a distribution by
Weatherford to its stockholders of all of the Companys
Common Stock. Weatherford no longer owns any interest in the
Company. Prior to the Companys 2003 Annual Meeting held in
May 2003, the Company had seven Directors, five of which also
served on the Board of Weatherford. Following the 2003 Annual
Meeting, the Company now has nine Directors, of which only three
serve on Weatherfords Board.
The Companys Drill Bits segment sells drill bits worldwide
to oil and gas operators, including Newfield Exploration Company
(Newfield). In addition, a division of the Companys
Tubular Technology and Services
73
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
segment also sells accessories directly to Newfield. Two of the
Companys directors, Mr. Trice and Mr. Hendrix,
are directors of Newfield and Mr. Trice is Newfields
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. During 2004,
Newfield purchased approximately $2.1 million of products
from the Company. The Company believes that the prices it
charges are on terms comparable to those that would be available
to unaffiliated third parties.
The Company operates through three primary business segments:
Drilling Products and Services, Drill Bits and Tubular
Technology and Services. In the first quarter of 2004, the
Company announced an organizational restructuring which
collapsed the former Marine Products and Services segment into
the Tubular Technology and Services segment. This segment
reporting change was made as these combined operations have
similar economic characteristics and will be managed by one
chief operating decision maker. Prior periods have been restated
to conform to the current year presentation.
The Companys Drilling Products and Services segment
manufactures and sells a full range of proprietary and API drill
pipe, drill collars, heavyweight drill pipe and accessories. The
Drill Bits segment designs, manufactures and distributes
fixed-cutter and roller-cone drill bits. The Companys
Tubular Technology and Services segment designs, manufactures
and sells a line of premium connections and associated premium
tubular products and accessories for oil country tubular goods
and offshore applications. The Company also has an Other
segment, that prior to the first quarter of 2003, included the
Companys industrial drill pipe operations and its
construction casing and water well operations. The Company
exited these product lines in the first half of 2003, and for
the remainder of 2003 and 2004, this segment has liquidated the
remaining industrial product inventories. Additionally, this
segment included three of the Companys technology joint
ventures, of which two of the joint ventures were either sold or
terminated in the first quarter of 2004. See Note 5 for
further discussion on dispositions.
The Companys products are used in the exploration and
production of oil and natural gas. Segment information below has
been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 131,
Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related
Information. The accounting policies of the segments are
the same as those described in the Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies, except that income tax
(provision) benefit is allocated to the segments by an
application of the Company-wide effective rate to the net income
(loss) of each segment. Intersegment sales, which have been
eliminated at the segment level, are recorded at cost plus an
agreed upon intercompany profit.
74
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tubular | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Products | |
|
|
|
Technology and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Services | |
|
Drill Bits | |
|
Services | |
|
Other | |
|
Corporate | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Unaffiliated Customers
|
|
$ |
390,617 |
|
|
$ |
326,918 |
|
|
$ |
226,233 |
|
|
$ |
1,875 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
945,643 |
|
|
Intersegment Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
Other Charges
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
9,035 |
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
15,237 |
|
|
|
12,121 |
|
|
|
12,751 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
43,220 |
|
|
Equity Income in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
90,509 |
|
|
|
70,542 |
|
|
|
20,884 |
|
|
|
(2,117 |
) |
|
|
(38,146 |
) |
|
|
141,672 |
|
|
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
(27,624 |
) |
|
|
(20,242 |
) |
|
|
(5,267 |
) |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
21,029 |
|
|
|
(31,710 |
) |
|
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant, and Equipment
|
|
|
8,808 |
|
|
|
18,794 |
|
|
|
4,986 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
4,845 |
|
|
|
37,879 |
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
40,950 |
|
|
|
41,889 |
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
489,684 |
|
|
|
519,258 |
|
|
|
258,517 |
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
76,648 |
|
|
|
1,344,466 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Unaffiliated Customers
|
|
$ |
308,297 |
|
|
$ |
258,975 |
|
|
$ |
226,607 |
|
|
$ |
9,939 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
803,818 |
|
|
Other Charges
|
|
|
24,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
12,396 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
37,823 |
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
14,912 |
|
|
|
11,191 |
|
|
|
13,424 |
|
|
|
3,356 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
44,688 |
|
|
Equity Income (Loss) in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
18,776 |
|
|
|
58,443 |
|
|
|
7,634 |
|
|
|
(16,754 |
) |
|
|
(22,802 |
) |
|
|
45,297 |
|
|
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
(8,366 |
) |
|
|
(15,062 |
) |
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
4,681 |
|
|
|
13,426 |
|
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant, and Equipment
|
|
|
16,260 |
|
|
|
10,175 |
|
|
|
9,664 |
|
|
|
940 |
|
|
|
4,379 |
|
|
|
41,418 |
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
42,838 |
|
|
|
43,871 |
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
478,714 |
|
|
|
450,653 |
|
|
|
273,587 |
|
|
|
8,721 |
|
|
|
50,386 |
|
|
|
1,262,061 |
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Unaffiliated Customers
|
|
$ |
317,280 |
|
|
$ |
5,270 |
|
|
$ |
258,458 |
|
|
$ |
28,382 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
609,390 |
|
|
Other Charges
|
|
|
2,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,465 |
|
|
|
7,045 |
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization
|
|
|
12,252 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
13,914 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
28,831 |
|
|
Equity Income (Loss) in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
5,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(647 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,342 |
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
58,029 |
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
12,824 |
|
|
|
(1,124 |
) |
|
|
(23,530 |
) |
|
|
46,995 |
|
|
(Provision) Benefit for Income Taxes
|
|
|
(20,835 |
) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(695 |
) |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
13,807 |
|
|
|
(7,574 |
) |
|
Capital Expenditures for Property, Plant, and Equipment
|
|
|
22,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,879 |
|
|
|
2,041 |
|
|
|
6,080 |
|
|
|
45,781 |
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
810 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
25,620 |
|
|
|
27,040 |
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
497,243 |
|
|
|
394,352 |
|
|
|
298,393 |
|
|
|
58,988 |
|
|
|
66,373 |
|
|
|
1,315,349 |
|
75
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
Foreign Operations and Export Sales |
Financial information by geographic segment for each of the
three years ended December 31, 2004 is summarized below.
Revenues are attributable to countries based on the location of
the entity selling products rather than ultimate use. Long-lived
assets represent long-term assets excluding deferred tax assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United | |
|
|
|
Latin | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
States | |
|
Canada | |
|
America | |
|
Italy | |
|
Asia | |
|
Other | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
577,479 |
|
|
$ |
72,950 |
|
|
$ |
43,986 |
|
|
$ |
20,938 |
|
|
$ |
123,100 |
|
|
$ |
107,190 |
|
|
$ |
945,643 |
|
|
Long-Lived Assets
|
|
|
413,431 |
|
|
|
18,405 |
|
|
|
73,336 |
|
|
|
42,752 |
|
|
|
78,741 |
|
|
|
118,965 |
|
|
|
745,630 |
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
458,421 |
|
|
$ |
84,213 |
|
|
$ |
51,567 |
|
|
$ |
11,818 |
|
|
$ |
100,793 |
|
|
$ |
97,006 |
|
|
$ |
803,818 |
|
|
Long-Lived Assets
|
|
|
458,791 |
|
|
|
18,358 |
|
|
|
75,237 |
|
|
|
43,426 |
|
|
|
58,900 |
|
|
|
93,971 |
|
|
|
748,683 |
|
2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
445,114 |
|
|
$ |
38,175 |
|
|
$ |
10,212 |
|
|
$ |
24,564 |
|
|
$ |
63,746 |
|
|
$ |
27,579 |
|
|
$ |
609,390 |
|
|
Long-Lived Assets
|
|
|
518,406 |
|
|
|
19,806 |
|
|
|
88,163 |
|
|
|
35,757 |
|
|
|
85,465 |
|
|
|
45,248 |
|
|
|
792,845 |
|
|
|
|
Major Customers and Credit Risk |
Substantially all of the Companys customers are engaged in
the exploration and development of oil and gas reserves. The
Companys drill pipe, drill bit products and other related
products are sold primarily to rig contractors, operators and
rental companies. The Companys premium tubulars and
connections are sold primarily to operators and distributors.
This concentration of customers may impact the Companys
overall exposure to credit risk, either positively or
negatively, in that customers may be similarly affected by
changes in economic and industry conditions. The Company
performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and does
not generally require collateral in support of its trade
receivables. The Company maintains reserves for potential credit
losses, and actual losses have historically been within the
Companys expectations. Foreign sales also present various
risks, including risks of war, civil disturbances and
governmental activities that may limit or disrupt markets,
restrict the movement of funds, or result in the deprivation of
contract rights or the taking of property without fair
consideration. Most of the Companys foreign sales,
however, are to large international companies, in-country
national oil companies, or are secured by a letter of credit or
similar arrangements.
In the three years ended December 31, 2004, there were no
individual customers who accounted for 10% or more of total
revenues.
76
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
19. |
Selected Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) |
The following table presents unaudited quarterly financial data
for 2004 and 2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 (a) | |
|
|
| |
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
191,481 |
|
|
$ |
224,666 |
|
|
$ |
246,366 |
|
|
$ |
283,130 |
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
77,589 |
|
|
|
88,437 |
|
|
|
97,573 |
|
|
|
121,237 |
|
Other Charges
|
|
|
2,734 |
(b) |
|
|
2,498 |
(c) |
|
|
3,803 |
(d) |
|
|
|
|
Selling, General and Administrative
|
|
|
53,944 |
|
|
|
55,672 |
|
|
|
59,312 |
|
|
|
65,201 |
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
20,911 |
|
|
|
30,267 |
|
|
|
34,458 |
|
|
|
56,036 |
|
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
6,564 |
|
|
|
12,045 |
|
|
|
17,234 |
|
|
|
28,950 |
|
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
(9,885 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(305 |
) |
Net Income
|
|
|
7,206 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
17,255 |
|
|
|
28,645 |
|
Basic Net Income Per Share(e):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
122,044 |
|
|
|
122,767 |
|
|
|
123,805 |
|
|
|
124,669 |
|
Diluted Net Income Per Share(e):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
124,262 |
|
|
|
125,383 |
|
|
|
126,603 |
|
|
|
127,614 |
|
77
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
|
|
First | |
|
Second | |
|
Third | |
|
Fourth | |
|
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
Quarter | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
182,885 |
|
|
$ |
181,243 |
|
|
$ |
212,928 |
|
|
$ |
226,762 |
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
59,416 |
|
|
|
52,868 |
(f) |
|
|
74,338 |
|
|
|
83,624 |
|
Other Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,320 |
(h) |
Selling, General, and Administrative
|
|
|
42,531 |
|
|
|
43,475 |
|
|
|
51,962 |
|
|
|
55,583 |
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
16,885 |
|
|
|
9,315 |
(a)(b) |
|
|
22,376 |
|
|
|
(3,279 |
) |
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
4,354 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
(a)(b) |
|
|
7,405 |
|
|
|
(10,579 |
) |
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
|
|
|
(320 |
) |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
|
4,034 |
|
|
|
3,826 |
|
|
|
7,484 |
|
|
|
(10,154 |
) |
Basic Net Income (Loss) Per Share(e):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
121,377 |
|
|
|
121,636 |
|
|
|
121,775 |
|
|
|
121,792 |
|
Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share(e):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
122,977 |
|
|
|
123,576 |
|
|
|
123,308 |
|
|
|
121,792 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
As a result of the Companys testing of internal controls
in connection with Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 requirements,
the Company reported a material weakness in its revenue
recognition practices. The material weakness relates to
inadequate documentation supporting the Companys revenue
recognition procedures in certain of its operating divisions
(See ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures).As a result of the
material weakness, the Company tested revenue transactions and
determined that while title and risk of loss had transferred to
the customer, in certain instances the supporting documentation
did not meet all of the requirements to recognize revenue prior
to the products being in the physical possession of the
customer. Therefore, the revenue and profits from these
transactions are required to be deferred until the period in
which the customer takes physical possession. The first three
quarters of 2004 have been restated, as previously reported in
the Companys 10-Qs, to properly reflect these
deferred revenue transactions. The impact of this restatement on
the first, second and third quarters of 2004 was:a)revenues were
increased (decreased) by $(28,077,000), $(549,000) and
$(3,895,000), respectively, b) operating income was
increased (decreased) by $(5,230,000), $(217,000) and
$(2,153,000), respectively, c) net income from continuing
operations was increased (decreased) by $(3,399,500),
$(141,050) and $(1,399,450), respectively, and d) basic and
diluted net income per share was increased (decreased) by
$(0.03), $0.00 and $(0.01), respectively. The impact on prior
years financial statements was not material. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes other charges of $1.8 million related to the
Drilling Products rationalization program and $0.9 million
of severance costs associated with the organizational
restructuring of the Companys Tubular Technology Services
segment in the first quarter of 2004. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes other charges of $2.3 million for severance costs
associated with the organizational restructuring of the
Companys Tubular Technology Services segment and
$0.2 million related to the Drilling products
rationalization program in the second quarter of 2004. |
78
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Includes other charges of $3.8 million in the third quarter
of 2004 related to the relocation of the Companys
corporate offices in September 2004. |
|
(e) |
|
Earnings per share (EPS) in each quarter is computed using
the weighted average number of shares outstanding during that
quarter while EPS for the full year is computed by taking the
average of the weighted average number of shares outstanding
each quarter. Thus, the sum of the four quarters EPS may
not equal the full-year EPS. |
|
(f) |
|
Includes $6.4 million of other charges in the second
quarter of 2003 related to inventory reserves for exited product
lines, which were classified as cost of sales. |
|
(g) |
|
Includes other charges of $1.5 million for stock
compensation expense and a $1.4 million credit for a
previously recorded contingent liability in the second quarter
of 2003. |
|
(h) |
|
Includes other charges of $31.3 million in the fourth
quarter of 2003 related to fixed asset write-downs and asset
impairments related to two technology joint ventures. |
See Note 3 for further discussion of 2004 and 2003 other
charges.
79
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
|
|
20. |
Subsidiary Guarantor Financial Information |
The following condensed consolidating statements of operations
for the three-year periods ended December 31, 2004,
condensed consolidating balance sheets as of December 31,
2004 and 2003, and condensed consolidating statements of cash
flows for the three-year periods ended December 31, 2004
are provided for the Companys domestic subsidiaries that
are guarantors of debt securities issued by the Company.The
Companys obligations to pay principal and interest under
the 9% and
95/8% Senior
Notes are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by all of the
Companys domestic subsidiaries.The guarantees are full and
unconditional and the guarantor subsidiaries are 100% owned by
Grant Prideco, Inc.
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
649,202 |
|
|
$ |
296,441 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
945,643 |
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397,176 |
|
|
|
163,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
560,807 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,536 |
|
|
|
73,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
234,129 |
|
|
Other charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,984 |
|
|
|
2,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564,696 |
|
|
|
239,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
803,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,506 |
|
|
|
57,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,672 |
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(36,758 |
) |
|
|
(4,486 |
) |
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,889 |
) |
Equity in Subsidiaries, Net of Taxes
|
|
|
80,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,425 |
|
|
|
(2,027 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
398 |
|
Equity Income in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,625 |
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
(2,672 |
) |
|
|
(80,383 |
) |
|
|
(39,926 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and
Minority Interest
|
|
|
43,625 |
|
|
|
84,010 |
|
|
|
54,494 |
|
|
|
(80,383 |
) |
|
|
101,746 |
|
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
|
|
|
11,641 |
|
|
|
(30,100 |
) |
|
|
(13,251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,710 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations Before Minority Interests
|
|
|
55,266 |
|
|
|
53,910 |
|
|
|
41,243 |
|
|
|
(80,383 |
) |
|
|
70,036 |
|
Minority Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,243 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations
|
|
|
55,266 |
|
|
|
53,910 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
(80,383 |
) |
|
|
64,793 |
|
Loss From Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,527 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
55,266 |
|
|
$ |
44,383 |
|
|
$ |
36,000 |
|
|
$ |
(80,383 |
) |
|
$ |
55,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
529,661 |
|
|
$ |
274,157 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
803,818 |
|
Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
407,411 |
|
|
|
126,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533,572 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,805 |
|
|
|
73,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,551 |
|
|
Other charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,475 |
|
|
|
7,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550,691 |
|
|
|
207,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
758,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,030 |
) |
|
|
66,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,297 |
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(36,644 |
) |
|
|
(6,564 |
) |
|
|
(663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43,871 |
) |
Equity in Subsidiaries, Net of Taxes
|
|
|
26,741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,741 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
3,489 |
|
|
|
17,245 |
|
|
|
(9,570 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,164 |
|
Equity Loss in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,414 |
) |
|
|
10,203 |
|
|
|
(10,233 |
) |
|
|
(26,741 |
) |
|
|
(33,185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and
Minority Interest
|
|
|
(6,414 |
) |
|
|
(10,827 |
) |
|
|
56,094 |
|
|
|
(26,741 |
) |
|
|
12,112 |
|
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
|
|
|
11,604 |
|
|
|
4,032 |
|
|
|
(19,875 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,239 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Minority
Interests
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
(6,795 |
) |
|
|
36,219 |
|
|
|
(26,741 |
) |
|
|
7,873 |
|
Minority Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,216 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
(6,795 |
) |
|
|
33,003 |
|
|
|
(26,741 |
) |
|
|
4,657 |
|
Income From Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (Loss)
|
|
$ |
5,190 |
|
|
$ |
(6,262 |
) |
|
$ |
33,003 |
|
|
$ |
(26,741 |
) |
|
$ |
5,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
Year Ended December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Revenues
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
445,114 |
|
|
$ |
164,276 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
609,390 |
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361,477 |
|
|
|
110,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472,220 |
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,043 |
|
|
|
19,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83,130 |
|
|
Other charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,745 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,045 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431,265 |
|
|
|
131,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,849 |
|
|
|
33,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,995 |
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
(23,003 |
) |
|
|
(2,919 |
) |
|
|
(1,118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,040 |
) |
Equity in Subsidiaries, Net of Taxes
|
|
|
22,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
(2,247 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(982 |
) |
Equity Income in Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
3,688 |
|
|
|
(3,365 |
) |
|
|
(22,506 |
) |
|
|
(22,680 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes and
Minority Interest
|
|
|
(497 |
) |
|
|
17,537 |
|
|
|
29,781 |
|
|
|
(22,506 |
) |
|
|
24,315 |
|
Income Tax (Provision) Benefit
|
|
|
7,131 |
|
|
|
(2,702 |
) |
|
|
(12,003 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,574 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations Before Minority Interests
|
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
|
14,835 |
|
|
|
17,778 |
|
|
|
(22,506 |
) |
|
|
16,741 |
|
Minority Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,051 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income From Continuing Operations
|
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
|
14,835 |
|
|
|
14,727 |
|
|
|
(22,506 |
) |
|
|
13,690 |
|
Loss From Discontinued Operations, Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
|
|
|
6,634 |
|
|
|
14,191 |
|
|
|
14,727 |
|
|
|
(22,506 |
) |
|
|
13,046 |
|
Cumulative Effect of Accounting Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
|
$ |
6,634 |
|
|
$ |
7,779 |
|
|
$ |
14,727 |
|
|
$ |
(22,506 |
) |
|
$ |
6,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
ASSETS |
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,721 |
|
|
$ |
16,831 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,552 |
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,589 |
|
|
|
68,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,084 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
193,738 |
|
|
|
95,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
288,820 |
|
|
Deferred charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,204 |
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,236 |
|
|
|
2,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,473 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
|
8,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
405,408 |
|
|
|
191,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
596,767 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,793 |
|
|
|
102,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,305 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,004 |
|
|
|
187,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
393,993 |
|
Investment In and Advances to Subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,080,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,080,596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment In and Advances to Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,159 |
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
6,101 |
|
|
|
38,357 |
|
|
|
15,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,086,697 |
|
|
$ |
840,721 |
|
|
$ |
497,644 |
|
|
$ |
(1,080,596 |
) |
|
$ |
1,344,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,181 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,912 |
|
|
|
30,829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,741 |
|
|
Deferred revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,413 |
|
|
Current deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
3,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
6,673 |
|
|
|
56,821 |
|
|
|
31,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,058 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,673 |
|
|
|
123,280 |
|
|
|
65,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,501 |
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
374,483 |
|
|
|
3,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377,773 |
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,536 |
|
|
|
25,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,433 |
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,954 |
|
|
|
1,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,224 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,994 |
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
705,541 |
|
|
|
691,661 |
|
|
|
388,935 |
|
|
|
(1,080,596 |
) |
|
|
705,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,086,697 |
|
|
$ |
840,721 |
|
|
$ |
497,644 |
|
|
$ |
(1,080,596 |
) |
|
$ |
1,344,466 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET
As of December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations | |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
ASSETS |
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,620 |
|
|
$ |
16,610 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,230 |
|
|
Restricted cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,303 |
|
|
|
93,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
212,285 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160,982 |
|
|
|
71,012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
231,994 |
|
|
Current deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,345 |
|
|
|
1,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,283 |
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,573 |
|
|
|
11,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,841 |
|
|
|
195,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510,863 |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164,537 |
|
|
|
86,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251,236 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,952 |
|
|
|
187,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
396,944 |
|
Investment In and Advances to Subsidiaries
|
|
|
982,881 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(982,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investment In and Advances to Unconsolidated Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,786 |
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
7,682 |
|
|
|
29,832 |
|
|
|
17,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
990,563 |
|
|
$ |
766,948 |
|
|
$ |
487,431 |
|
|
$ |
(982,881 |
) |
|
$ |
1,262,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,106 |
|
|
$ |
1,967 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
11,073 |
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,091 |
|
|
|
25,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,408 |
|
|
Current deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3,757 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,763 |
|
|
Other accrued liabilities
|
|
|
3,260 |
|
|
|
39,595 |
|
|
|
34,156 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,260 |
|
|
|
97,798 |
|
|
|
65,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
166,255 |
|
Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
374,305 |
|
|
|
50,406 |
|
|
|
2,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
426,853 |
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,912 |
|
|
|
20,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,965 |
|
Other Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
6,884 |
|
|
|
9,289 |
|
|
|
7,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,843 |
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority Interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,031 |
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
606,114 |
|
|
|
602,543 |
|
|
|
380,338 |
|
|
|
(982,881 |
) |
|
|
606,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
990,563 |
|
|
$ |
766,948 |
|
|
$ |
487,431 |
|
|
$ |
(982,881 |
) |
|
$ |
1,262,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
(24,211 |
) |
|
$ |
116,546 |
|
|
$ |
20,835 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
113,170 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33,833 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of businesses, net of cash disposed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,180 |
|
|
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations, net of cash
disposed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,859 |
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,167 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,167 |
) |
|
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,592 |
) |
|
|
(19,287 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,879 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,911 |
|
|
|
1,548 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,473 |
) |
|
|
(16,908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,381 |
) |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on debt, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,972 |
) |
|
|
(4,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,101 |
) |
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(2,508 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,508 |
) |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
25,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,791 |
|
|
ESPP Purchases
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
928 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
24,211 |
|
|
|
(59,972 |
) |
|
|
(4,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,890 |
) |
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,101 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,322 |
|
Cash at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
16,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Year
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
30,721 |
|
|
$ |
16,831 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
47,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
(20,381 |
) |
|
$ |
78,908 |
|
|
$ |
24,411 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
82,938 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(1,861 |
) |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
|
|
(5,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,272 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sales of businesses, net of cash disposed
|
|
|
24,064 |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,364 |
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,459 |
) |
|
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,461 |
) |
|
|
(17,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,418 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
22,203 |
|
|
|
(23,074 |
) |
|
|
(22,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,804 |
) |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on debt, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,904 |
) |
|
|
(4,686 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,590 |
) |
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,388 |
) |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,822 |
) |
|
|
(55,904 |
) |
|
|
(4,686 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,412 |
) |
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Decrease in Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(2,578 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,648 |
) |
Cash at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,690 |
|
|
|
19,188 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Year
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,620 |
|
|
$ |
16,610 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
GRANT PRIDECO, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Continued)
CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
Year Ended December 31, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non- | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Guarantors | |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
103,332 |
|
|
$ |
(991 |
) |
|
$ |
16,345 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
118,686 |
|
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(266,543 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(265,172 |
) |
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,794 |
) |
|
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,718 |
) |
|
|
(10,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,781 |
) |
|
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(266,543 |
) |
|
|
(38,652 |
) |
|
|
(8,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(313,836 |
) |
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on debt, net
|
|
|
164,317 |
|
|
|
40,428 |
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207,146 |
|
|
Purchases of treasury stock
|
|
|
(2,279 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,279 |
) |
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
163,211 |
|
|
|
40,428 |
|
|
|
2,401 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,040 |
|
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Increase in Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
10,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,494 |
|
Cash at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
8,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at End of Year
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,690 |
|
|
$ |
19,188 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants On
Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
|
|
Item 9A. |
Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have performed an evaluation under the supervision and with
the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). Based on
that evaluation and the material weakness described below, our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered by this report (December 31, 2004), for the reasons
discussed below our disclosure controls and procedures were not
effective in providing reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed by us in the reports filed or submitted
by us under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported, within the time periods specified in the
SECs rules and forms and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to the Companys management,
including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding
required disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting and for
performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004.
Our internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed by, or under the supervision of our chief executive and
principle financial officers, and effected by our board of
directors and management to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004.
In making this assessment, it used the framework entitled
Internal Control Integrated Framework
set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on its evaluation of the COSO
framework applied to Grant Pridecos internal control over
financial reporting, and the identification of the material
weakness described below, management concluded that Grant
Prideco did not maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2004.
A material weakness is a significant control deficiency, or
combination of significant control deficiencies, that results in
more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of
the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented
or detected.
Our revenue recognition policy provides for the recognition of
revenue for finished products delivered to our customer-owned
inventory yards, and not yet in the physical possession of our
customers, if certain criteria are met. The internal controls
over such transactions at our Drilling Products and Services and
Tubular Technology and Services segments were ineffective at
December 31, 2004. Specifically, our controls over
documentation of delivery terms requested by the customer and
customer notification necessary to record revenue prior to
customer possession of the product were ineffective at
December 31, 2004. As a result of these ineffective
controls, revenue was recorded during 2004 for certain product
sales which had not yet met all requirements to recognize
revenue. During the fourth quarter of 2004, we adjusted
revenues, net income and diluted earnings per share to exclude
those fourth quarter sales not meeting all revenue recognition
criteria. We also restated each previously reported 2004
quarterly revenues and net income, and for the first and third
quarters, diluted earnings per share.
88
Actions Taken to Correct Material Weakness
In order to address the material weakness identified, management
intends to make corrective measures during 2005 including:
1) requiring a checklist to be completed prior to revenue
recognition to ensure that all sales orders have the required
documentation and 2) initiating processes and procedures to
better document the terms of sales transactions including
transaction review and monitoring activities. We believe that
these corrective actions will remedy the identified material
weakness with respect to, and improve, both our disclosure
controls and procedures and internal control over financial
reporting at December 31, 2004. We have discussed our
corrective actions and future plans with our Audit Committee,
which has approved them, and with our independent registered
public accounting firm. Such firm has an attestation report on
our managements assessment of our internal control over
financial reporting, and such firms attestation report is
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Controls
Except as described above, there has been no changes in our
internal control over financial reporting during our most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
89
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Grant Prideco, Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting, that Grant Prideco, Inc. (Company) did not
maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2004, because of the effect of the material
weakness identified in managements assessment and
described below, based on criteria established in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO
criteria). Companys management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting
and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, evaluating
managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design
and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of
control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote
likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected. The
following material weakness has been identified and included in
managements assessment. The Companys revenue
recognition policy provides for the recognition of revenue for
finished products delivered to the Companys customer-owned
inventory yards, and not yet in the physical possession of its
customers, if certain criteria are met. The internal controls
over such transactions at the Companys Drilling Products
and Services and Tubular Technology and Services segments were
ineffective at December 31, 2004. Specifically, the
Companys controls over documentation of delivery terms
requested by the customer and customer notification necessary to
record revenue prior to customer possession of the product were
ineffective at December 31, 2004. As a result of these
ineffective controls, revenue was recorded during 2004 for
certain product sales which had not yet met all requirements to
recognize revenue. During the fourth quarter of 2004, the
Company adjusted revenues, net income and diluted earnings per
share to exclude those fourth quarter sales not meeting all
revenue recognition criteria. The Company also restated each
previously reported 2004 quarterly revenues and net income, and
for the first and third quarters, diluted earnings per
90
share. This material weakness was considered in determining the
nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of
the 2004 consolidated financial statements, and this report does
not affect our report dated March 29, 2005 on those
financial statements.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Grant Prideco,
Inc. did not maintain effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2004, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also, in our
opinion, because of the effect of the material weakness
described above on the achievement of the objectives of control
criteria, Grant Prideco, Inc. did not maintain effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2004, based on the COSO criteria.
Houston, Texas
March 29, 2005
91
PART III
|
|
Item 10. |
Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference from Grant Pridecos Proxy Statement for its 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004.
|
|
Item 11. |
Executive Compensation |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference from Grant Pridecos Proxy Statement for its 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004.
|
|
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and
Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference from Grant Pridecos Proxy Statement for its 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004.
|
|
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference from Grant Pridecos Proxy Statement for its 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004.
|
|
Item 14. |
Principal Accounting Fees and Services |
The information required by this item is incorporated by
reference from Grant Pridecos Proxy Statement for its 2005
Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC within
120 days after the end of the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004.
PART IV
|
|
Item 15. |
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules |
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this
report or incorporated herein by reference:
|
|
|
1. Our consolidated financial statements are listed on
page 33 of this report. |
|
|
2. Financial Statement Schedules: |
|
|
|
Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
for the three years ended December 31, 2004. |
|
|
Note: All financial statement schedules not filed with this
report required by Regulation S-X have been omitted as not
applicable or not required or the information required has been
included in the notes to financial statements. |
|
|
|
3. Our exhibits are listed below under Item 15(b). |
(b) Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Distribution Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2000, between
Weatherford and Grant Prideco, Inc. (incorporated by Reference
to Exhibit 2.1 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form S-3, Reg. No. 333-35272). |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Grant Prideco, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Grant Prideco,
Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Reg.
No. 333-35272). |
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Restated Bylaws of Grant Prideco, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Registration Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423,
as amended). |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Indenture for
95/8% Senior
Notes due 2007 (incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.7 to
Grant Prideco, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 1-15423). |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Form of
95/8% Senior
Notes due 2007 (included as part of Exhibit 4.1 above). |
|
4 |
.3* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 1-15423). |
|
4 |
.4* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Option and Stock Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form 10,
File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
4 |
.5* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form 10,
File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
4 |
.6* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. Foreign Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form 10,
File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
4 |
.7* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on
Form 10, File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
4 |
.8* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Registration Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423,
as amended). |
|
4 |
.9* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001, File No. 1-15423). |
|
4 |
.10 |
|
Indenture relating to 9% Senior Notes due 2009 dated as of
December 4, 2002, between Grant Prideco Escrow Corp. and
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 1-15423, filed on January 3,
2003). |
|
4 |
.11 |
|
Form of 9% Senior Notes due 2009 (included as part of
Exhibit 4.10). |
|
4 |
.12 |
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 20, 2002, among
Grant Prideco, Inc., Grant Prideco Escrow Corp., certain of
Grant Prideco, Inc.s subsidiaries, and Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4
to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K,
File No. 1-15423, filed on January 3, 2003). |
|
4 |
.13 |
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2002, among
Grant Prideco, Inc., certain of its subsidiaries, the Lenders
party thereto, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as US,
Deutsche Bank AG, Canada Branch, as Canadian Agent, Transamerica
Business Capital Corporation, as Documentation Agent, JP Morgan
Chase Bank, as Co-Syndication Agent, and Lynch Capital, as
Co-Syndication Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.6 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 1-15423, filed on January 3,
2003). |
|
4 |
.14 |
|
Security Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2002, among
Grant Prideco, Inc., certain of its subsidiaries and Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, as agent (incorporated by Reference
to Exhibit 4.7 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Current Report
on Form 8-K, File No. 1-15423, filed on
January 3, 2003). |
|
4 |
.15 |
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
December 19, 2002 between Grant Prideco Canada Ltd. and
Deutsche Bank AG, Canada Branch, as agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-15423, filed on
January 3, 2003). |
|
4 |
.16 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.17 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
File No. 1-15423). |
|
4 |
.17 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.18 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
File No. 1-15423). |
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
.18 |
|
Security Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2002 between
Grant Prideco Canada Ltd. and Deutsche Bank AG, Canada Branch,
as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 1-15423, filed on January 3, 2003). |
|
4 |
.19 |
|
Form of Subsidiary Guarantee by certain of Grant Prideco,
Inc.s subsidiaries in favor of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.10 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Current Report
on Form 8-K, File No. 1-15423, filed on
January 3, 2003). |
|
4 |
.20* |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.21 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File
No. 1-15423). |
|
4 |
.21* |
|
Form of Executive Restricted-Stock Agreement (with tandem tax
rights). |
|
4 |
.22* |
|
Form of Executive Restricted-Stock Agreement. |
|
4 |
.23* |
|
Form of Executive Stock Option Agreement (with accelerated
vesting upon termination). |
|
4 |
.24* |
|
Form of Executive Stock Option Agreement (without accelerated
vesting upon termination). |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
See Exhibits 2.1 and 4.1 through 4.24 for certain items
material contracts. |
|
10 |
.2* |
|
Employment Agreement with Michael McShane dated June 26,
2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2002, File No. 1-15423). |
|
10 |
.3* |
|
Employment Agreement with Matthew Fitzgerald dated
January 12, 2004 (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.3 to the Grant Prideco Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). |
|
10 |
.4* |
|
Employment Agreement with Philip Choyce dated April 14,
2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-4,
Reg. No. 333-102635). |
|
10 |
.5* |
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement with William Chunn, Dan
Latham, Warren Avery and Philip Choyce (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000, File No. 1-15423). |
|
10 |
.6* |
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement with David Black, Jim
Breihan, Greg Boane, Jay Mitchell and John Deane (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Annual Report on 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001,
File No. 1-15423). |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Preferred Supplier Agreement dated April 14, 2000, between
Grant Prideco, Inc. and Weatherford International, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Weatherford
International, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, File
No. 1-13086). |
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to preferred supplier agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Tax Allocation Agreement dated April 14, 2000 between Grant
Prideco, Inc. and Weatherford (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 to Weatherford International, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000, File No. 1-13086). |
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Investment Agreement, dated as of April 29, 1999, by and
between Grant Prideco, Inc. and Voest-Alpine Schienen
GmbH & Co KG (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Operating Agreement, dated as of July 23, 1999, by and
Grant Prideco, Inc. and Voest-Alpine Schienen GmbH &
CoKG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form 10,
File No. 1 -15423, as amended). |
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Supply Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2003, by and
between Voest-Alpine Stahlrohr Kindberg GmbH & Co KG
and Grant Prideco, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File
No. 1-15423). |
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Voest-Alpine Supply Agreement. |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Voest-Alpine Supply Agreement. |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 19, 1998, by and
between Weatherford, Pridecomex Holding, S.A. de C.V., Tubos de
Acero de Mexico S.A. and Tamsider S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Registration Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423,
as amended). |
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Master Technology License Agreement, dated as of June 19,
1998, by and between Grant Prideco, Inc. and DST Distributors of
Steel Tubes Limited (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Agreement, dated as of November 12, 1998, by and between
Tubos de Acero de Mexico, Tamsider S.A. de C.V., DST
Distributors of Steel Tubes Limited, Techint Engineering
Company, Weatherford, Grand Prideco, Pridecomex Holding, S.A. de
C.V. and Grant Prideco, S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.18 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
10 |
.18 |
|
Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1998, by and between
Tubos de Acero de Mexico, Tamsider S.A. de C.V., Weatherford and
Pridecomex Holdings, S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
10 |
.19* |
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
File No. 1-15423). |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
21.1 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003, File No. 1-15423). |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Michael McShane. |
|
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Matthew D. Fitzgerald. |
|
32 |
.1 |
|
Section 906 Certification. |
|
|
* |
Designates a management or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
95
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance At | |
|
Charged to | |
|
Charged to | |
|
|
|
Balance | |
|
|
Beginning | |
|
Cost and | |
|
Other | |
|
|
|
At End | |
Descriptions |
|
of Year | |
|
Expenses | |
|
Accounts | |
|
Deductions | |
|
of Year | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
(In thousands) | |
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
|
|
$ |
3,539 |
|
|
$ |
3,844 |
|
|
$ |
1,141 |
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
8,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserves
|
|
$ |
14,910 |
|
|
$ |
6,961 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
9,084 |
|
|
$ |
13,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
|
|
$ |
2,815 |
|
|
$ |
1,948 |
|
|
$ |
(397 |
) |
|
$ |
827 |
|
|
$ |
3,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserves
|
|
$ |
10,695 |
|
|
$ |
11,718 |
|
|
$ |
(312 |
) |
|
$ |
7,191 |
|
|
$ |
14,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
|
|
$ |
1,407 |
|
|
$ |
1,106 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
2,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory Reserves
|
|
$ |
9,321 |
|
|
$ |
5,844 |
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
4,465 |
|
|
$ |
10,695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
Michael McShane |
|
Chief Executive Officer, President, |
|
and Chairman of the Board |
Date: March 31, 2005
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following
individuals on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities
and on the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Capacity in Which Signed |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael McShane
Michael
McShane |
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
/s/ Matthew D.
Fitzgerald
Matthew
D. Fitzgerald |
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
/s/ Greg L. Boane
Greg
L. Boane |
|
Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
/s/ David J. Butters
David
J. Butters |
|
Director |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
/s/ Eliot M. Fried
Eliot
M. Fried |
|
Director |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
/s/ Dennis R. Hendrix
Dennis
R. Hendrix |
|
Director |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
/s/ Harold E. Layman
Harold
E. Layman |
|
Director |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
/s/ Sheldon B. Lubar
Sheldon
B. Lubar |
|
Director |
|
March 31, 2005 |
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Capacity in Which Signed |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Robert K. Moses,
Jr.
Robert
K. Moses, Jr. |
|
Director |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
/s/ Joseph E. Reid
Joseph
E. Reid |
|
Director |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
/s/ David A. Trice
David
A. Trice |
|
Director |
|
March 31, 2005 |
98
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
2 |
.1 |
|
Distribution Agreement, dated as of March 22, 2000, between
Weatherford and Grant Prideco, Inc. (incorporated by Reference
to Exhibit 2.1 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form S-3, Reg. No. 333-35272). |
|
3 |
.1 |
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Grant Prideco, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Grant Prideco,
Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-3, Reg.
No. 333-35272). |
|
3 |
.2 |
|
Restated Bylaws of Grant Prideco, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Registration Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423,
as amended). |
|
4 |
.1 |
|
Indenture for
95/8% Senior
Notes due 2007 (incorporated by Reference to Exhibit 4.7 to
Grant Prideco, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 1-15423). |
|
4 |
.2 |
|
Form of
95/8% Senior
Notes due 2007 (included as part of Exhibit 4.1 above). |
|
4 |
.3* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2000, File No. 1-15423). |
|
4 |
.4* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Option and Stock Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form 10,
File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
4 |
.5* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form 10,
File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
4 |
.6* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. Foreign Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form 10,
File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
4 |
.7* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee
Directors (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to
Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on
Form 10, File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
4 |
.8* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Registration Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423,
as amended). |
|
4 |
.9* |
|
Grant Prideco, Inc. 2001 Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plan
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2001, File No. 1-15423). |
|
4 |
.10 |
|
Indenture relating to 9% Senior Notes due 2009 dated as of
December 4, 2002, between Grant Prideco Escrow Corp. and
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.2 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 1-15423, filed on January 3,
2003). |
|
4 |
.11 |
|
Form of 9% Senior Notes due 2009 (included as part of
Exhibit 4.10). |
|
4 |
.12 |
|
Supplemental Indenture dated as of December 20, 2002, among
Grant Prideco, Inc., Grant Prideco Escrow Corp., certain of
Grant Prideco, Inc.s subsidiaries, and Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4
to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K,
File No. 1-15423, filed on January 3, 2003). |
|
4 |
.13 |
|
Credit Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2002, among
Grant Prideco, Inc., certain of its subsidiaries, the Lenders
party thereto, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as US,
Deutsche Bank AG, Canada Branch, as Canadian Agent, Transamerica
Business Capital Corporation, as Documentation Agent, JP Morgan
Chase Bank, as Co-Syndication Agent, and Lynch Capital, as
Co-Syndication Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.6 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Current Report on
Form 8-K, File No. 1-15423, filed on January 3,
2003). |
|
4 |
.14 |
|
Security Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2002, among
Grant Prideco, Inc., certain of its subsidiaries and Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas, as agent (incorporated by Reference
to Exhibit 4.7 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Current Report
on Form 8-K, File No. 1-15423, filed on
January 3, 2003). |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
4 |
.15 |
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
December 19, 2002 between Grant Prideco Canada Ltd. and
Deutsche Bank AG, Canada Branch, as agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 1-15423, filed on
January 3, 2003). |
|
4 |
.16 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.17 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
File No. 1-15423). |
|
4 |
.17 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.18 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
File No. 1-15423). |
|
4 |
.18 |
|
Security Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2002 between
Grant Prideco Canada Ltd. and Deutsche Bank AG, Canada Branch,
as agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.9 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Current Report on Form 8-K, File
No. 1-15423, filed on January 3, 2003). |
|
4 |
.19 |
|
Form of Subsidiary Guarantee by certain of Grant Prideco,
Inc.s subsidiaries in favor of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.10 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Current Report
on Form 8-K, File No. 1-15423, filed on
January 3, 2003). |
|
4 |
.20* |
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.21 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File
No. 1-15423). |
|
4 |
.21* |
|
Form of Executive Restricted-Stock Agreement (with tandem tax
rights). |
|
4 |
.22* |
|
Form of Executive Restricted-Stock Agreement. |
|
4 |
.23* |
|
Form of Executive Stock Option Agreement (with accelerated
vesting upon termination). |
|
4 |
.24* |
|
Form of Executive Stock Option Agreement (without accelerated
vesting upon termination). |
|
10 |
.1 |
|
See Exhibits 2.1 and 4.1 through 4.24 for certain items
material contracts. |
|
10 |
.2* |
|
Employment Agreement with Michael McShane dated June 26,
2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 2002, File No. 1-15423). |
|
10 |
.3* |
|
Employment Agreement with Matthew Fitzgerald dated
January 12, 2004 (incorporated by reference from
Exhibit 10.3 to the Grant Prideco Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004). |
|
10 |
.4* |
|
Employment Agreement with Philip Choyce dated April 14,
2000 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form S-4,
Reg. No. 333-102635). |
|
10 |
.5* |
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement with William Chunn, Dan
Latham, Warren Avery and Philip Choyce (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000, File No. 1-15423). |
|
10 |
.6* |
|
Form of Change of Control Agreement with David Black, Jim
Breihan, Greg Boane, Jay Mitchell and John Deane (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Annual Report on 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001,
File No. 1-15423). |
|
10 |
.7 |
|
Preferred Supplier Agreement dated April 14, 2000, between
Grant Prideco, Inc. and Weatherford International, Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Weatherford
International, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2000, File
No. 1-13086). |
|
10 |
.8 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to preferred supplier agreement
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended March 31, 2003). |
|
10 |
.9 |
|
Tax Allocation Agreement dated April 14, 2000 between Grant
Prideco, Inc. and Weatherford (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.13 to Weatherford International, Inc.s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2000, File No. 1-13086). |
|
10 |
.10 |
|
Investment Agreement, dated as of April 29, 1999, by and
between Grant Prideco, Inc. and Voest-Alpine Schienen
GmbH & Co KG (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
10 |
.11 |
|
Operating Agreement, dated as of July 23, 1999, by and
Grant Prideco, Inc. and Voest-Alpine Schienen GmbH &
CoKG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Grant
Prideco, Inc.s Registration Statement on Form 10,
File No. 1 -15423, as amended). |
|
10 |
.12 |
|
Supply Agreement, dated as of August 1, 2003, by and
between Voest-Alpine Stahlrohr Kindberg GmbH & Co KG
and Grant Prideco, Inc. (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.12 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, File
No. 1-15423). |
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit | |
|
Description |
| |
|
|
|
10 |
.13 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Voest-Alpine Supply Agreement. |
|
10 |
.14 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Voest-Alpine Supply Agreement. |
|
10 |
.15 |
|
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 19, 1998, by and
between Weatherford, Pridecomex Holding, S.A. de C.V., Tubos de
Acero de Mexico S.A. and Tamsider S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s
Registration Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423,
as amended). |
|
10 |
.16 |
|
Master Technology License Agreement, dated as of June 19,
1998, by and between Grant Prideco, Inc. and DST Distributors of
Steel Tubes Limited (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.17 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
10 |
.17 |
|
Agreement, dated as of November 12, 1998, by and between
Tubos de Acero de Mexico, Tamsider S.A. de C.V., DST
Distributors of Steel Tubes Limited, Techint Engineering
Company, Weatherford, Grand Prideco, Pridecomex Holding, S.A. de
C.V. and Grant Prideco, S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.18 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
10 |
.18 |
|
Agreement, dated as of December 1, 1998, by and between
Tubos de Acero de Mexico, Tamsider S.A. de C.V., Weatherford and
Pridecomex Holdings, S.A. de C.V. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19 to Grant Prideco, Inc.s Registration
Statement on Form 10, File No. 1-15423, as amended). |
|
10 |
.19* |
|
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003,
File No. 1-15423). |
|
21 |
.1 |
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
21.1 of Grant Pridecos Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2003, File No. 1-15423). |
|
23 |
.1 |
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
31 |
.1 |
|
Certification of Michael McShane. |
|
31 |
.2 |
|
Certification of Matthew D. Fitzgerald. |
|
32 |
.1 |
|
Section 906 Certification. |
|
|
* |
Designates a management or compensatory plan or arrangement. |