FORM 10-Q
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-6402-1
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
Texas | 74-1488375 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I. R. S. employer identification | |
incorporation or organization) | number) | |
1929 Allen Parkway, Houston, Texas | 77019 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
713-522-5141
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES X
|
NO |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 12b-2).
YES X
|
NO |
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock as of November 1, 2004 was 330,339,308 (net of treasury shares).
1
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
INDEX
Page |
||||||||
3 | ||||||||
Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 |
||||||||
4 | ||||||||
September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 |
||||||||
5 | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 |
||||||||
6 | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 |
||||||||
7-34 | ||||||||
34 | ||||||||
34-35 | ||||||||
35-37 | ||||||||
37-40 | ||||||||
40-46 | ||||||||
46-49 | ||||||||
49-56 | ||||||||
56-57 | ||||||||
57-58 | ||||||||
58-60 | ||||||||
60 | ||||||||
60 | ||||||||
60 | ||||||||
60-61 | ||||||||
62 | ||||||||
Form of Indemnification Agreement | ||||||||
First Amendment to Retirement Savings Plan | ||||||||
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges | ||||||||
Certification of CEO - Section 302 | ||||||||
Certification of CFO - Section 302 | ||||||||
Certification of CEO - Section 906 | ||||||||
Certification of CFO - Section 906 |
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
(Restated) | (Restated) | |||||||||||||||
note 17 | note 17 | |||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 403,352 | $ | 566,461 | $ | 1,421,526 | $ | 1,729,337 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses |
335,083 | 497,515 | 1,166,776 | 1,450,801 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
68,269 | 68,946 | 254,750 | 278,536 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(25,298 | ) | (52,775 | ) | (100,347 | ) | (110,454 | ) | ||||||||
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net |
(3,281 | ) | (1,452 | ) | 33,018 | 5,413 | ||||||||||
Other operating income (expense) |
| | 6,932 | (1,724 | ) | |||||||||||
Operating income |
39,690 | 14,719 | 194,353 | 171,771 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(27,888 | ) | (34,835 | ) | (94,668 | ) | (107,968 | ) | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt |
| 176 | (16,770 | ) | 2,079 | |||||||||||
Other income, net |
4,569 | 11,218 | 12,758 | 16,590 | ||||||||||||
(23,319 | ) | (23,441 | ) | (98,680 | ) | (89,299 | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes and cumulative effects of accounting
changes |
16,371 | (8,722 | ) | 95,673 | 82,472 | |||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
4,079 | (3,331 | ) | (4,468 | ) | 29,815 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
cumulative effects of accounting changes |
$ | 12,292 | $ | (5,391 | ) | $ | 100,141 | $ | 52,657 | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations (net of income
tax expense (benefit) of $141, $112, ($48,815) and
$336, respectively) |
284 | 659 | 35,375 | 2,005 | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effects of accounting changes (net of
income tax benefit of $21,274) |
| | (48,061 | ) | | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 12,576 | $ | (4,732 | ) | $ | 87,455 | $ | 54,662 | |||||||
Basic earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
cumulative effects of accounting changes |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .32 | $ | .18 | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | .11 | | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effects of accounting changes, net
of tax |
| | (.15 | ) | | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .28 | $ | .18 | |||||||
Diluted earnings (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
cumulative effects of accounting changes |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .31 | $ | .18 | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | .10 | | ||||||||||||
Cumulative effects of accounting changes,
net of tax |
| | (.14 | ) | | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .27 | $ | .18 | |||||||
Basic weighted average number of shares |
336,590 | 300,507 | 315,656 | 299,221 | ||||||||||||
Diluted weighted average number of shares |
340,215 | 300,507 | 348,894 | 299,842 | ||||||||||||
(See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements)
3
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share amounts)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 318,045 | $ | 239,431 | ||||
Receivables, net |
118,414 | 229,839 | ||||||
Inventories |
86,951 | 136,807 | ||||||
Current assets of discontinued operations |
5,808 | 6,101 | ||||||
Other |
171,957 | 61,146 | ||||||
Total current assets |
701,175 | 673,324 | ||||||
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments |
1,192,619 | 1,229,765 | ||||||
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments |
1,370,412 | 1,083,035 | ||||||
Cemetery property, at cost |
1,534,642 | 1,524,847 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, net |
969,849 | 1,277,583 | ||||||
Non-current assets of discontinued operations |
4,340 | 3,217 | ||||||
Deferred charges and other assets |
668,151 | 738,011 | ||||||
Goodwill |
1,167,092 | 1,195,422 | ||||||
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments |
699,888 | | ||||||
$ | 8,308,168 | $ | 7,725,204 | |||||
Liabilities & Stockholders Equity |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 369,608 | $ | 449,497 | ||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
59,025 | 182,682 | ||||||
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
9,187 | 7,600 | ||||||
Income taxes |
7,466 | 29,576 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
445,286 | 669,355 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
1,235,691 | 1,519,189 | ||||||
Deferred preneed funeral revenues |
480,514 | 1,612,347 | ||||||
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues |
874,298 | 1,575,352 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
311,583 | 418,375 | ||||||
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations |
69,647 | 53,930 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
361,360 | 349,698 | ||||||
Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts |
1,977,856 | | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (note 12) |
||||||||
Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts |
675,140 | | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $1 per share par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized,
332,658,017 and 302,039,871, issued and outstanding
(net of 7,970,268 and 2,469,445 treasury shares, at par) |
332,658 | 302,040 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value |
2,451,512 | 2,274,664 | ||||||
Unearned compensation |
(2,264 | ) | | |||||
Accumulated deficit |
(850,608 | ) | (938,063 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(54,505 | ) | (111,683 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,876,793 | 1,526,958 | ||||||
$ | 8,308,168 | $ | 7,725,204 | |||||
(See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements)
4
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
Nine months ended | ||||||||
September 30, |
||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||
(Restated) | ||||||||
note 17 | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 87,455 | $ | 54,662 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations |
(35,375 | ) | (2,005 | ) | ||||
Loss (gains) on early extinguishments of debt |
16,770 | (2,079 | ) | |||||
Cumulative effects of accounting changes, net of tax |
48,061 | | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
103,607 | 122,120 | ||||||
(Benefit) provision for deferred income taxes |
(6,507 | ) | 7,635 | |||||
(Gains) and impairment losses on dispositions, net |
(33,018 | ) | (5,413 | ) | ||||
Other operating (income) expense |
(6,932 | ) | 1,724 | |||||
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions and dispositions: |
||||||||
Decrease in receivables |
20,213 | 52,291 | ||||||
Decrease in other assets |
964 | 32,617 | ||||||
Increase in payables and other liabilities |
19,757 | 33,080 | ||||||
Net effect of preneed funeral production and maturities |
(30,461 | ) | 1,289 | |||||
Net effect of cemetery production and deliveries |
(4,159 | ) | (1,876 | ) | ||||
Other |
348 | 10,468 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations |
180,723 | 304,513 | ||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from discontinued operations |
2,503 | (925 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
183,226 | 303,588 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(67,495 | ) | (79,864 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from divestitures and sales of property and equipment |
30,326 | 52,186 | ||||||
Proceeds and distributions from joint ventures and equity investments, net
of cash retained |
330,789 | 30,802 | ||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(1,818 | ) | | |||||
Payment of purchase obligations to former owners of acquired business |
(51,749 | ) | | |||||
Net deposits of restricted funds and other |
(119,085 | ) | (56,230 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities from continuing operations |
120,968 | (53,106 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities from discontinued operations |
(132 | ) | (373 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
120,836 | (53,479 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
241,237 | | ||||||
Payments of debt |
(124,752 | ) | (86,604 | ) | ||||
Early extinguishments of debt |
(313,778 | ) | (194,019 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
6,040 | | ||||||
Purchase of Company common stock |
(34,812 | ) | | |||||
Bank overdrafts and other |
| (10,349 | ) | |||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(226,065 | ) | (290,972 | ) | ||||
Effect of foreign currency |
617 | 4,158 | ||||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
78,614 | (36,705 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
239,431 | 200,625 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 318,045 | $ | 163,920 | ||||
(See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements)
5
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
(In thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Capital in | other | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | excess of | Unearned | Accumulated | comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock |
par value |
Compensation |
deficit |
loss |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003 |
$ | 302,040 | $ | 2,274,664 | $ | | $ | (938,063 | ) | $ | (111,683 | ) | $ | 1,526,958 | ||||||||||
Net income |
87,455 | 87,455 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation |
(25,427 | ) | (25,427 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum pension liability |
33,599 | 33,599 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification for translation
adjustments realized in net
income |
49,006 | 49,006 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income |
57,178 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Contributions to employee 401(k) plan |
2,110 | 12,048 | 14,158 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option exercises and other |
1,658 | 6,397 | 8,055 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Debt conversion |
32,034 | 185,120 | 217,154 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock award |
428 | 2,483 | (2,911 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock amortization |
647 | 647 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of common stock |
(5,612 | ) | (29,200 | ) | (34,812 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2004 |
$ | 332,658 | $ | 2,451,512 | $ | (2,264 | ) | $ | (850,608 | ) | $ | (54,505 | ) | $ | 1,876,793 | |||||||||
(See notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements)
6
SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
1. Nature of Operations
Service Corporation International (SCI or the Company) is the worlds largest provider of funeral and cemetery services. The Company owns and operates funeral service locations, cemeteries and crematoria located in seven countries. The Company also has a minority interest equity investment in funeral operations in France. In addition to its cemetery and funeral operations, the Company owns and operates Kenyon International Emergency Services, a disaster response team that engages in mass fatality and emergency response services.
The funeral service and cemetery operations consist of funeral service locations, cemeteries, crematoria and related businesses. Personnel at the funeral service locations provide all professional services relating to funerals, including the use of funeral facilities and motor vehicles, and preparation and embalming services. Funeral related merchandise (including caskets, coffins, burial vaults, cremation receptacles, flowers and other ancillary products and services) is sold at funeral service locations. Certain funeral service locations contain crematoria. The Company sells preneed funeral services whereby a customer contractually agrees to the terms of a funeral to be performed in the future. The Companys cemeteries provide cemetery property interment rights (including mausoleum spaces, lots and lawn crypts) and sell cemetery related merchandise (including stone and bronze memorials, burial vaults, casket and cremation memorialization products) and services (primarily merchandise installations and burial openings and closings). Cemetery items are sold on an atneed or preneed basis. Personnel at cemeteries perform interment services and provide management and maintenance of cemetery grounds. Certain cemeteries operate crematoria, and certain cemeteries contain gardens specifically for the purpose of cremation memorialization.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 include the accounts of the Company and all majority-owned subsidiaries and are unaudited but include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals and any other adjustments, which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the results for these periods. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in a manner consistent with the accounting policies described in the Companys current report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2004, which superseded the annual report on Form 10-K filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2003, unless otherwise disclosed herein, and should be read in conjunction therewith. The accompanying year-end consolidated balance sheet was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year period.
The Company has reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to the current period financial presentation with no effect on previously reported results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.
7
The effective tax rate in the three months ended September 30, 2004 was an expense of 24.9% compared to a benefit of 38.2% in the three months ended September 30, 2003. The 2004 rate was favorably impacted by a $2,356 tax benefit adjustment resulting from a change in estimated 2003 federal tax liabilities. The tax benefit in the three months ended September 30, 2003 is due to the net loss for the quarter. The effective tax rate in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was a benefit of 4.7% compared to an expense of 36.2% in the same period of 2003. The unusual tax rate in the nine months ended September 30, 2004 is due to non-cash tax benefits recognized from the joint venture of the French operations consummated in March 2004 and the sale of the Companys equity investment in the United Kingdom in the second quarter of 2004. For more information, see note fifteen to the consolidated financial statements.
Equity Investments
At September 30, 2004, the Company had a minority investment in certain funeral operations in France. The Company accounts for this investment using the equity method of accounting for investments recorded in Deferred charges and other assets on the Companys consolidated balance sheet.
Treasury Stock
The Company recently announced a share repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to $100,000 to repurchase its common stock. The Company makes purchases in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions and normal trading restrictions. The Company accounts for the repurchase of its common stock under the par value method. The Company uses the average cost method on the subsequent reissuance of treasury shares. Any resulting differences between the average cost and the current market value upon issuance of treasury stock to the Companys 401(k) plans are expensed as compensation cost.
3. Accounting Changes and New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) reached consensus on the guidance provided by Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 03-1 (EITF 03-1), The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. The guidance is applicable to debt and equity securities that are within the scope of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. EITF 03-1 specifies that an impairment would be considered other-than-temporary unless (a) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for the recovery of the fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment and (b) evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. EITF 03-1 was scheduled to be effective for reporting periods ending after June 15, 2004. The measurement and recognition provisions relating to debt and equity securities have been delayed until the FASB issues additional guidance. The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of EITF 03-1 during the period ended June 30, 2004. The adoption of the measurement and recognition provisions will not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements, result of operations or liquidity of the Company.
Variable Interest Entities
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51. This interpretation clarifies the application of ARB No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties.
In December 2003, the FASB revised FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46R).
8
Under the provisions of FIN 46R, the Company is required to consolidate certain cemeteries and trust assets. Merchandise and service trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts are considered variable interest entities because the trusts meet the conditions of paragraphs 5(a) and 5(b)(1) of FIN 46R. That is, as a group, the equity investors (if any) do not have sufficient equity at risk and do not have the direct or indirect ability through voting or similar rights to make decisions about the trusts activities that have a significant effect on the success of the trusts. FIN 46R requires the Company to consolidate merchandise and service trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts for which the Company is the primary beneficiary (i.e., those for which the Company absorbs a majority of the trusts expected losses). The Company is the primary beneficiary of a trust whenever a majority of the assets of the trust are attributable to deposits of customers of the Company.
Consolidation of Trusts: The Company implemented FIN 46R as of March 31, 2004, which resulted in the consolidation of the Companys preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trust assets and the Companys cemetery perpetual care trusts. No cumulative effect of an accounting change was recognized by the Company as a result of the implementation of FIN 46R as it relates to the consolidation of the trusts. The implementation of FIN 46R affects certain line items on the Companys consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as described below; however, there is no impact to net income in the statement of operations as a result of the implementation. Additionally, the implementation of FIN 46R did not result in any net changes to the Companys consolidated statement of cash flows; however, it does require certain financing and investing activities to be disclosed. See notes four through six to the consolidated financial statements.
Although FIN 46R requires consolidation of most of the merchandise and service and perpetual care trusts, it does not change the legal relationships among the trusts, the Company and its customers. In the case of merchandise and service trusts, the customers are the legal beneficiaries. In the case of cemetery perpetual care trusts, the Company does not have a legal right to the perpetual care trust assets. For these reasons, upon consolidation of the trusts, the Company recognizes non-controlling interests in its financial statements to reflect third party interests in these trusts in accordance with FASB Statement No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liability and Equity (SFAS 150). The Company classifies deposits to merchandise and service trusts as non-controlling liability interests and classifies deposits to cemetery perpetual care trusts as non-controlling equity interests.
The Company records cash received from customers, which has not been deposited in trusts as restricted cash in Deferred charges and other assets in its consolidated balance sheet. At September 30, 2004, these pending deposits totaled $10,800. The Company continues to account for amounts received from customers prior to delivery of merchandise or services that are not required to be deposited in merchandise and service trusts as deferred revenue.
Beginning March 31, 2004, the Company recognizes net realized investment earnings of the merchandise and service trusts and perpetual care trusts, as well as the related trustee investment expenses and taxes, within Other income, net. The Company then recognizes a corresponding expense within Other income, net representing the net realized earnings of those trusts that are attributable to the non-controlling interest holders. The corresponding credit for this expense is reflected in the Companys consolidated balance sheet in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts for merchandise and service trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts for cemetery perpetual care trusts. The sum of these expenses recorded in Other income, net offset the net realized earnings of such trusts also recognized within Other income, net. Accordingly, the Companys net income in the consolidated statement of operations is not affected by consolidation of the trusts in accordance with FIN 46R.
To the extent the earnings of the trusts are distributed prior to the delivery of merchandise and/or services, a corresponding amount of non-controlling interest is reclassified to deferred revenue until the corresponding revenues are recognized. In the case of merchandise and service trusts, the Company recognizes as revenues, amounts previously attributed to non-controlling interests and deferred revenues upon the performance of services and delivery of merchandise, including earnings accumulated in these trusts. In the case of the cemetery perpetual care trusts, distributable earnings are recognized in cemetery revenues to the extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs.
Prior to the implementation of FIN 46R and the consolidation of the trusts, monies received from customers and deposited into merchandise and service trusts until maturity of the preneed contract were recorded as receivables due from trust assets. Upon
9
implementation of FIN 46R, the Company replaced receivables due from trust assets with the trust assets, at market, to the extent the Company was required to consolidate the trusts.
An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience. An allowance is no longer provided on the monies associated with the preneed contract that are held in trust, currently recorded as trust assets, but previously recorded as receivables due from trust assets. As such, the amount has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R.
Both the merchandise and services trusts and the cemetery perpetual care trusts hold investments in marketable securities that are classified as available-for-sale by the Company under the requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS 115). In accordance with SFAS 115, available-for-sale securities of the trusts are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and initially recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. Using the guidance in EITF Topic D-41, Adjustments in Assets and Liabilities for Holding Gains and Losses as Related to the Implementation of FASB Statement No. 115 (Topic D-41), unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities of the trusts attributable to the non-controlling interest holders are not recorded as Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), but are recorded as an adjustment to either Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts. Therefore, unrealized gains and losses attributable to the non-controlling interest holders are reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to either Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts. The gross effect from applying Topic D-41 on the Companys Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is disclosed in note fourteen of the consolidated financial statements. However, the Companys Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the face of the balance sheet is ultimately not affected by consolidation of the trusts.
For additional discussion of the Companys accounting policies after the implementation of FIN 46R, see notes four through seven to the consolidated financial statements.
Consolidation of Certain Cemeteries: Effective as of March 31, 2004, the Company consolidated certain cemeteries managed by the Company in accordance with FIN 46R. The Company recognized an after tax charge of $14,462, representing the cumulative effect of an accounting change, as a result of consolidating these cemeteries. The results of operations and cash flows of these cemeteries are included in the Companys consolidated statements of operations and cash flows beginning March 31, 2004. Excluding the cumulative effect of accounting change, the effect of consolidating these entities did not have a significant impact on the Companys reported results of operations.
Insurance Funded Preneed Insurance Contracts
The Company has changed its method of accounting for insurance funded preneed contracts as the Company has concluded that its insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not assets and liabilities as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6, Elements in Financial Statements. Therefore, the Company has removed from its consolidated balance sheet amounts relating to insurance funded preneed funeral contracts previously recorded in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments and Deferred preneed funeral revenues, which at December 31, 2003, were $3,505,094, respectively. The removal of these amounts did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated stockholders equity, results of operations or cash flows. See note four to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on insurance related preneed funeral balances.
Pension Plans
In December 2003, the FASB revised SFAS No. 132, Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits (SFAS 132R). SFAS 132R requires additional disclosures about the assets, obligations, cash flows and net periodic benefit cost of defined benefit pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. The Company has adopted the revised disclosure requirements. The Companys pension plans are frozen with no cost benefits accreting to participants except interest.
Effective January 1, 2004, the Company changed its accounting for gains and losses on its pension plan assets and liabilities. The Company now recognizes such gains and losses in its consolidated statement of operations as such gains and losses are incurred under pension accounting. Prior to January 1, 2004, the Company amortized the difference between actual and expected investment returns
10
and actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except to the extent that settlements with employees required earlier recognition). The Company believes the new method of accounting better reflects the economic nature of the Companys pension plans and recognizes gains and losses on the pension plan assets and liabilities in the year the gains or losses occur. As a result of this accounting change, the Company recognized a charge for the cumulative effect of an accounting change of $33,599 (net of tax) as of January 1, 2004. This amount represents accumulated unrecognized net losses related to the pension plan assets and liabilities. In addition, for interim periods, the Company records net pension expense or income reflecting estimated returns on plan assets and obligations. The Company will recognize actual gains and losses on plan assets and obligations as actuarial information becomes available upon review of the annual remeasurement. See note ten to the consolidated financial statements for additional information on pensions.
The three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 pro forma amounts in the table below reflect the new policy to recognize gains and losses on the pension plans as incurred and reflect interim estimates as mentioned above.
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2003 |
September 30, 2003 |
|||||||||||||||
Historical |
Pro forma |
Historical |
Pro forma |
|||||||||||||
(Restated | (Restated | |||||||||||||||
note 17) | note 17) | |||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations before
cumulative effect of accounting change |
$ | (5,391 | ) | $ | (2,055 | ) | $ | 52,657 | $ | 59,737 | ||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (4,732 | ) | $ | (1,396 | ) | $ | 54,662 | $ | 61,742 | ||||||
Amounts per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net (loss) income basic |
$ | (.02 | ) | $ | (.01 | ) | $ | .18 | $ | .21 | ||||||
Net (loss) income diluted |
$ | (.02 | ) | $ | (.01 | ) | $ | .18 | $ | .21 |
4. Preneed Funeral Activities
The Company sells price-guaranteed preneed funeral contracts through various programs. Because the services or merchandise will not be provided until the future, most states and provinces require that all or a portion of the customer payments under these contracts be protected for the benefit of the customers pursuant to applicable law. Some or all of the funds may be required to be placed into trust accounts or a surety bond may be posted in lieu of trusting (collectively trust funded preneed funeral contracts). Alternatively, where allowed, customers may purchase a life insurance or annuity policy from third party insurance companies to fund their preneed funeral (insurance funded preneed funeral contracts). The insurance policy proceeds, which include increasing insurance benefits, will be used to pay the Company for the funeral goods and services selected at the time of contract origination. Under either customer funding option, the Company enters into a preneed funeral contract with the customer to provide funeral services in the future. The contract amounts associated with unfulfilled insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not reflected on the consolidated balance sheet. Effective March 31, 2004, the Company changed certain aspects of its accounting for trust funded preneed funeral contracts upon implementation of FIN 46R. For additional information, see note three to the consolidated financial statements. After the change, when a trust funded preneed funeral contract is consummated, the Company records an asset (included in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments) and corresponding liability (included in Deferred preneed funeral revenues) for the contract price. When the Company receives payments from the customer, the Company deposits the amount required by law into the trust and reclasses the corresponding amount from Deferred preneed funeral revenues into Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts. The Company deposited $8,542 and $32,770 into trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively and withdrew $18,509 and $38,817 from trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.
Direct selling costs related to trust funded preneed funeral contracts are deferred and included in Deferred charges and other assets in the Companys consolidated balance sheet. The deferred selling costs are expensed in proportion to the corresponding trust funded preneed funeral contract revenue when recognized. Deferred selling costs associated with trust funded preneed funeral contracts were $111,953 and $113,920 at September 30, 2004 and at December 31, 2003, respectively. Direct selling costs incurred pursuant to the sales of insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are expensed as incurred.
11
Preneed Funeral Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments, net of allowance for cancellation, represent trust assets and customer receivables related to unperformed, price-guaranteed trust funded preneed funeral contracts. The components of Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments in the Companys consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are as follows:
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
Receivables due from trust assets, at cost |
$ | | $ | 1,201,059 | ||||
Trust investments, at market |
1,039,118 | | ||||||
Receivables from customers |
168,580 | 190,332 | ||||||
1,207,698 | 1,391,391 | |||||||
Allowance for cancellation |
(15,079 | ) | (161,626 | ) | ||||
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments |
$ | 1,192,619 | $ | 1,229,765 | ||||
An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience. An allowance is no longer provided on the monies associated with the preneed contracts that are held in trust, currently recorded as trust investments, but previously recorded as receivables due from trust assets. As such, the amount has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R.
Upon cancellation of a trust funded preneed funeral contract, a customer is generally entitled to receive a refund of the funds held in trust. In many jurisdictions, the Company may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust including investment income. As a result, when realized or unrealized losses of a trust result in trust funded preneed funeral contracts being under-funded, the Company assesses such contracts to determine whether a loss provision should be recorded. No loss amounts have been required to be recognized as of September 30, 2004 or December 31, 2003.
Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments are reduced by the trust investment earnings the Company has been allowed to withdraw in certain states prior to maturity and amounts received from customers that are not required to be deposited into trust, pursuant to various state laws. These earnings are recorded in Deferred preneed funeral revenues until the service is performed or the merchandise is delivered.
The cost and market values associated with funeral trust investments at September 30, 2004 are detailed below. The market value of funeral trust investments was based primarily on quoted market prices at September 30, 2004. The Company periodically evaluates investments for other-than-temporary impairment and as a result of its most recent review believes the unrealized losses of $29,410 related to trust investments are temporary in nature. At September 30, 2004, the Companys unrealized losses greater than one year in duration primarily related to certain private equity and other investments.
12
Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||
Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
Market |
|||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 57,073 | $ | | $ | | $ | 57,073 | ||||||||
Fixed income securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury |
97,689 | 339 | (2,354 | ) | 95,674 | |||||||||||
Foreign government |
73,079 | 839 | (102 | ) | 73,816 | |||||||||||
Corporate |
13,513 | 310 | (342 | ) | 13,481 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed |
103,071 | 2,910 | (5,849 | ) | 100,132 | |||||||||||
Insurance-backed |
191,400 | | | 191,400 | ||||||||||||
Asset-backed and other |
6,492 | 1,124 | (1,394 | ) | 6,222 | |||||||||||
Equity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
307,815 | 28,998 | (6,782 | ) | 330,031 | |||||||||||
Mutual funds: |
||||||||||||||||
Equity |
56,787 | 8,734 | (303 | ) | 65,218 | |||||||||||
Fixed income |
43,353 | 668 | (44 | ) | 43,977 | |||||||||||
Private equity and other |
73,911 | 423 | (12,240 | ) | 62,094 | |||||||||||
Trust investments |
$ | 1,024,183 | $ | 44,345 | $ | (29,410 | ) | $ | 1,039,118 | |||||||
Market value as of a percentage of cost |
101.46 | % | ||||||||||||||
Maturities of fixed income securities at September 30, 2004 are estimated as follows:
Market |
||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 73,642 | ||
Due in one to five years |
151,149 | |||
Due in five to ten years |
70,754 | |||
Thereafter |
185,180 | |||
$ | 480,725 | |||
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, purchases of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments were $269,884 and $493,932, respectively and sales of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments were $276,927 and $561,306, respectively. These transactions resulted in $13,950 and $10,414 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, sales transactions resulted in $29,981 and $17,059 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively. The Company uses the FIFO method to determine the cost of funeral trust available-for-sale securities sold during the period.
Deferred Preneed Funeral Revenues
At September 30, 2004, Deferred preneed funeral revenues, net of allowance for cancellation, represent future funeral service revenues including distributed trust investment earnings associated with unperformed trust funded preneed funeral contracts that are not held in trust accounts. Future funeral service revenues and net trust investment earnings that are held in trust accounts are included in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts. At December 31, 2003 and prior to the implementation of FIN 46R, Deferred preneed funeral revenues represent the original price of a trust funded preneed funeral contract plus the net trust investment earnings.
An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience. However, the amount has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R, as the Company no longer provides an allowance for the deferred preneed funeral revenues now included in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts.
Insurance Funded Preneed Funeral Contracts
Not included in the consolidated balance sheet are insurance funded preneed funeral contracts that will be funded by life insurance or annuity contracts issued by third party insurers. The net amount of these contracts that have not been fulfilled at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, including increasing insurance benefits and reduced by an allowance for cancellation, was approximately $2,204,237 and $3,505,094 (of which $1,515,984 related to the Companys French operations at December 31, 2003), respectively, and were previously included in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments with a corresponding liability in Deferred preneed funeral revenues. The proceeds of the life insurance policies or annuity contracts will be reflected in funeral revenues as these funerals are performed by the Company.
13
5. Preneed Cemetery Activities
The Company sells price-guaranteed preneed cemetery contracts providing for future property interment rights, merchandise or services in advance of need at prices prevailing when the agreements are signed. Some or all of the funds received under these contracts for merchandise or services may be required to be placed into trust accounts, or a surety bond may be posted in lieu of trusting, pursuant to applicable law. Effective March 31, 2004, the Company changed certain aspects of its accounting for preneed cemetery contracts upon implementation of FIN 46R. For additional information, see note three to the consolidated financial statements. When the Company receives payments from the customer, the Company deposits the amount required by law into the trust and reclasses the corresponding amount from Deferred preneed cemetery revenues into Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts. The Company deposited $42,997 and $75,835 into the trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively and withdrew $24,257 and $57,581 from the trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.
Direct selling costs related to preneed cemetery contracts are deferred and included in Deferred charges and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The deferred selling costs are expensed in proportion to the corresponding revenue when recognized. Deferred selling costs related to preneed cemetery contracts were $205,504 and $205,123 as of September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively.
Preneed Cemetery Receivables and Trust Investments
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments, net of allowance for cancellation, represent trust investments and customer receivables (net of unearned finance charges) for contracts sold in advance of when the property interment rights, merchandise or services are needed. The components of Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 are as follows:
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
Receivables due from trust assets, at cost |
$ | | $ | 862,265 | ||||
Trust investments, at market |
1,000,652 | | ||||||
Receivables from customers |
493,130 | 522,079 | ||||||
Unearned finance charges |
(69,899 | ) | (75,785 | ) | ||||
1,423,883 | 1,308,559 | |||||||
Allowance for cancellation |
(53,471 | ) | (225,524 | ) | ||||
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments |
$ | 1,370,412 | $ | 1,083,035 | ||||
Interest rates on cemetery contracts ranged from 3.5% to 15.7% for both periods presented. The average term of a financed preneed cemetery contract is approximately 4.6 years.
An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience with a corresponding decrease in Deferred preneed cemetery revenues. The amount of the allowance has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R. An allowance is no longer provided on the monies associated with the preneed contract that are held in trust, currently recorded as trust investments, but previously recorded as receivables due from trust investments.
The cost and market values associated with the cemetery merchandise and service trust investments at September 30, 2004 are detailed below. The market value of cemetery trust investments was based primarily on quoted market prices at September 30, 2004. The Company periodically evaluates investments for other-than-temporary impairment and as a result of the Companys most recent review believes the unrealized losses of $24,891 related to trust investments are temporary in nature. At September 30, 2004, the Companys unrealized losses greater than one year in duration primarily related to private equity and other investments.
14
Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||
Cost |
Gains |
Losses |
Market |
|||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 132,841 | $ | | $ | | $ | 132,841 | ||||||||
Fixed income securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury |
111,442 | 3,729 | (262 | ) | 114,909 | |||||||||||
Foreign government |
14,571 | 570 | (3 | ) | 15,138 | |||||||||||
Corporate |
14,220 | 415 | (100 | ) | 14,535 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed |
172,902 | 4,005 | (882 | ) | 176,025 | |||||||||||
Asset-backed and other |
22,996 | 1,014 | (58 | ) | 23,952 | |||||||||||
Equity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
287,818 | 40,718 | (14,650 | ) | 313,886 | |||||||||||
Mutual funds: |
||||||||||||||||
Equity |
102,464 | 17,819 | (214 | ) | 120,069 | |||||||||||
Fixed income |
37,313 | 366 | (70 | ) | 37,609 | |||||||||||
Private equity and other |
60,227 | 113 | (8,652 | ) | 51,688 | |||||||||||
Trust investments |
$ | 956,794 | $ | 68,749 | $ | (24,891 | ) | $ | 1,000,652 | |||||||
Market value as a percentage of cost |
104.58 | % | ||||||||||||||
Maturities of fixed income securities at September 30, 2004 are estimated as follows:
Market |
||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 23,423 | ||
Due in one to five years |
61,965 | |||
Due in five to ten years |
73,473 | |||
Thereafter |
185,698 | |||
$ | 344,559 | |||
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, purchases of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments were $142,468 and $426,831, respectively and sales of available-for-sale securities included in trust investments were $185,794 and $470,090, respectively. These sale transactions resulted in $13,553 and $12,215 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, sales transactions resulted in $30,279 and $20,755 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively. The Company uses the FIFO method to determine the cost of cemetery trust available-for-sale securities sold during the period.
Deferred Preneed Cemetery Revenues
At September 30, 2004, Deferred preneed cemetery revenues, net of allowance for cancellation, represent future preneed cemetery revenues including distributed trust investment earnings associated with unperformed trust funded preneed cemetery contracts that are not held in trust accounts. Future contract revenues and net trust investment earnings that are held in trust accounts are included in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts. At December 31, 2003 and prior to the implementation of FIN 46R, Deferred preneed cemetery revenues represent the original price of a trust funded preneed cemetery contract plus the net trust investment earnings.
An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience. However, the amount has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R, as the Company no longer provides an allowance for the deferred preneed cemetery revenues now included in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts.
6. Cemetery Perpetual Care Trusts
The Company is required by state or provincial law to pay into perpetual care trusts a portion of the proceeds from the sale of cemetery property interment rights. As a result of the implementation of FIN 46R, the Company has consolidated the perpetual care trust investments with a corresponding amount recorded as Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts. The Company deposited $5,877 and $12,091 into trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively and withdrew $11,951 and $17,616 from trusts during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively.
15
The cost and market value associated with trust investments held in perpetual care trusts at September 30, 2004 are detailed below. The market value of perpetual care trusts was based primarily on quoted market prices at September 30, 2004. The Company periodically evaluates investments for other-than-temporary impairments and as a result of its most recent review believes the unrealized losses of $4,802 related to trust assets are temporary in nature. There were no significant investments with unrealized losses at September 30, 2004 greater than one year in duration.
Cost |
Unrealized Gains |
Unrealized Losses |
Market |
|||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 29,132 | $ | | $ | | $ | 29,132 | ||||||||
Fixed income securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury |
51,407 | 1,633 | (54 | ) | 52,986 | |||||||||||
Foreign government |
28,860 | 1,202 | (7 | ) | 30,055 | |||||||||||
Corporate |
78,862 | 4,467 | (554 | ) | 82,775 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed |
101,580 | 1,449 | (488 | ) | 102,541 | |||||||||||
Asset-backed |
54,423 | 342 | (241 | ) | 54,524 | |||||||||||
Equity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock |
13,771 | 1,375 | (198 | ) | 14,948 | |||||||||||
Common stock |
83,422 | 10,231 | (2,241 | ) | 91,412 | |||||||||||
Mutual funds: |
||||||||||||||||
Equity |
30,067 | 8,228 | (206 | ) | 38,089 | |||||||||||
Fixed income |
147,205 | 3,741 | (318 | ) | 150,628 | |||||||||||
Private equity and other |
50,047 | 3,246 | (495 | ) | 52,798 | |||||||||||
Perpetual care trust investments |
$ | 668,776 | $ | 35,914 | $ | (4,802 | ) | $ | 699,888 | |||||||
Market value as a percentage of cost |
104.65 | % | ||||||||||||||
Maturities of fixed income securities at September 30, 2004 are estimated as follows:
Market |
||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 1,249 | ||
Due in one to five years |
99,260 | |||
Due in five to ten years |
73,293 | |||
Thereafter |
149,079 | |||
$ | 322,881 | |||
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, purchases of available-for-sale securities in the perpetual care trusts were $284,909 and $571,078, respectively and sales of available-for-sale securities in the perpetual care trusts were $283,402 and $559,921, respectively. These sale transactions resulted in $4,638 and $1,871 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively for the three months ended September 30, 2004. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004, these sales transactions resulted in $8,225 and $5,553 of realized gains and realized losses, respectively. The Company uses the FIFO method to determine the cost of perpetual care trusts available-for-sale securities sold during the period.
Distributable earnings from these perpetual care trust investments are recognized in current cemetery revenues to the extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs. Recognized earnings related to these perpetual care trust investments were $9,974 and $7,428 for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, and $22,778 and $20,675 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
7. Non-Controlling Interest in Funeral and Cemetery Trusts and in Perpetual Care Trusts
Non-Controlling Interest in Funeral and Cemetery Trusts
16
Effective March 31, 2004, the Company consolidated the merchandise and service trusts associated with its preneed funeral and cemetery activities as a result of the implementation of FIN 46R. Although FIN 46R requires the consolidation of the merchandise and service trusts, it does not change the legal relationships among the trusts, the Company and its customers. The customers are the legal beneficiaries of these merchandise and service trusts, and therefore, their interests in these trusts represent a non-controlling interest in subsidiaries. For additional information, see note three to the consolidated financial statements.
Non-Controlling Interest in Perpetual Care Trusts
The Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts reflected in the consolidated balance sheet represents the cemetery perpetual care trusts, net of the accrued expenses and other long-term liabilities of the perpetual care trusts. For additional information, see note three to the consolidated financial statements.
The components of Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts and Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts in the Companys consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004 are detailed below.
Cemetery | ||||||||||||||||
perpetual | ||||||||||||||||
Preneed funeral |
Preneed cemetery |
Total |
care |
|||||||||||||
Trust investments, at market value |
$ | 1,039,118 | $ | 1,000,652 | $ | 2,039,770 | $ | 699,888 | ||||||||
Less: |
||||||||||||||||
Debt associated with certain trust investments |
31,993 | 27,543 | 59,536 | 18,362 | ||||||||||||
Accrued trust operating payables, deferred
taxes and other |
897 | 1,481 | 2,378 | 6,386 | ||||||||||||
32,890 | 29,024 | 61,914 | 24,748 | |||||||||||||
Non-controlling interest |
$ | 1,006,228 | $ | 971,628 | $ | 1,977,856 | $ | 675,140 | ||||||||
Debt Associated with Certain Trusts Consolidated by the Company
Certain trusts, consolidated with the adoption of FIN 46R and recorded in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments, Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments and Cemetery perpetual care trust investments, have indirect interests in real estate partnerships. These partnerships have incurred indebtedness of $77,898 that is included in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004. The trusts obligation on this indebtedness is limited to their investment in the respective partnerships. The debt has interest rates ranging from 5.0% to 8.5% and maturities between 2011 and 2019.
Other income, net
The components of Other income, net in the Companys consolidated statement of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2004 are detailed below. See notes three through six to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the amounts related to the funeral, cemetery and perpetual care trusts.
17
Funeral | Cemetery | Cemetery perpetual | ||||||||||||||||||
trusts |
trusts |
care trusts |
Other, net |
Total |
||||||||||||||||
Realized gains |
$ | 13,950 | $ | 13,553 | $ | 4,638 | $ | | $ | 32,141 | ||||||||||
Realized losses |
(10,414 | ) | (12,215 | ) | (1,871 | ) | | (24,500 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest, dividend and other ordinary
income |
4,101 | 6,138 | 10,101 | | 20,340 | |||||||||||||||
Trust expenses and income taxes |
(2,554 | ) | (3,722 | ) | (1,626 | ) | | (7,902 | ) | |||||||||||
Net trust investment income |
5,083 | 3,754 | 11,242 | | 20,079 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense related to non-
controlling interest in funeral and
cemetery trust investments |
(5,083 | ) | (3,754 | ) | | | (8,837 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest expense related to non-
controlling interest in perpetual care
trust investments |
| | (11,242 | ) | | (11,242 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total non-controlling interest |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other income |
| | | 4,569 | 4,569 | |||||||||||||||
Total other income, net |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 4,569 | $ | 4,569 | ||||||||||
The components of Other income, net in the Companys consolidated statement of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 are detailed below.
Cemetery | ||||||||||||||||||||
Funeral | Cemetery | perpetual | ||||||||||||||||||
trusts |
trusts |
care trusts |
Other, net |
Total |
||||||||||||||||
Realized gains |
$ | 29,981 | $ | 30,279 | $ | 8,225 | $ | | $ | 68,485 | ||||||||||
Realized losses |
(17,059 | ) | (20,755 | ) | (5,553 | ) | | (43,367 | ) | |||||||||||
Interest, dividend and other ordinary
income |
9,349 | 11,924 | 19,621 | | 40,894 | |||||||||||||||
Trust expenses and income taxes |
(4,731 | ) | (6,159 | ) | (4,243 | ) | | (15,133 | ) | |||||||||||
Net trust investment income |
17,540 | 15,289 | 18,050 | | 50,879 | |||||||||||||||
Interest expense related to non-
controlling interest in funeral and
cemetery trust investments |
(17,540 | ) | (15,289 | ) | | | (32,829 | ) | ||||||||||||
Interest expense related to non-
controlling interest in perpetual care
trust investments |
| | (18,050 | ) | | (18,050 | ) | |||||||||||||
Total non-controlling interest |
| | | | | |||||||||||||||
Other income |
| | | 12,758 | 12,758 | |||||||||||||||
Total other income, net |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 12,758 | $ | 12,758 | ||||||||||
Amounts included in Other income within Other income, net primarily relate to foreign currency gains and losses, interest income on notes receivable and general agency commissions from third party insurance companies.
8. Debt
Debt was as follows:
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
7.375% notes due April 2004 |
$ | | $ | 111,190 | ||||
8.375% notes due December 2004 |
50,797 | 50,797 | ||||||
6.0% notes due December 2005 |
63,801 | 272,451 | ||||||
7.2% notes due 2006 |
150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||
6.875% notes due 2007 |
143,475 | 143,475 | ||||||
6.5% notes due 2008 |
195,000 | 195,000 | ||||||
6.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2008, conversion price of
$6.92 per share |
| 312,694 | ||||||
7.7% notes due 2009 |
358,266 | 358,266 |
18
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
7.875% debentures due 2013 |
55,627 | 55,627 | ||||||
6.75% notes due 2016 |
250,000 | | ||||||
Convertible debentures, maturities through 2013, fixed interest rates
from 4.75% to 5.5%, conversion prices from $13.02 to $50.00 per share |
30,375 | 38,368 | ||||||
Mortgage notes and other debt, maturities through 2050 |
41,576 | 63,597 | ||||||
Deferred charges |
(44,201 | ) | (49,594 | ) | ||||
Total debt |
1,294,716 | 1,701,871 | ||||||
Less current maturities |
(59,025 | ) | (182,682 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 1,235,691 | $ | 1,519,189 | ||||
The Companys consolidated debt had a weighted average interest rate of 7.08% and 6.95% at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. Approximately 99% of the total debt had a fixed interest rate at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
Bank Credit Agreements
The Companys bank credit agreement, which was executed on August 11, 2004, provides a total lending commitment of $200,000, including a sublimit of $175,000 for letters of credit. The agreement, which matures August 2007, replaces a $185,000 facility that was set to expire in July 2005. Upon closing, the Company transferred $72,456 in letters of credit, which were originally issued under the previously existing bank credit agreement. The new bank credit facility provides the Company with greater flexibility in terms of acquisitions, dividends and share repurchases. It is secured by the stock of the Companys domestic subsidiaries and these domestic subsidiaries have guaranteed the Companys indebtedness associated with this facility. The facility contains certain financial covenants, including a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio, maximum capital expenditure limitations, minimum net worth requirements and certain cash distribution restrictions. Interest rates for the outstanding borrowings will be based on various indices as determined by the Company. The Company also will pay a quarterly fee on the unused commitment, which ranges from 0.25% to 0.50%.
Debt Issuances and Additions
In connection with $250,000 of senior unsecured 6.75% notes due April 1, 2016, issued on April 14, 2004 in an unregistered offering, the Company filed a registration statement on September 2, 2004 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a Registration Rights Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, the interest rate on the new notes increased by 0.25% for the period that the Company failed to file the registration statement. During the period of July 14, 2004 to September 1, 2004, the interest rate on the notes increased by 0.25% for an aggregate incremental interest expense of $83. On September 2, 2004, the interest rate reverted to the stated rate of 6.75%. The majority of the holders of the unregistered notes have exchanged for registered notes.
The holders of $221,633 of the Companys 6.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2008 converted their holdings to equity on June 22, 2004, pursuant to the terms of the notes. The Company paid $7,480 in accrued interest to the holders. Simultaneously, the Company exercised its option by redeeming the remaining outstanding $91,061 of the notes. The Company paid a total of $97,649, including interest and premium, to the holders of the redeemed notes and recognized a $5,606 loss on the early extinguishment of debt, recorded in (Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt, in the consolidated statement of operations during the quarter ended June 30, 2004.
Debt Extinguishments and Reductions
In March 2004, in connection with the joint venture of the Companys operations in France, mortgage notes and other debt was reduced by approximately $24,194 for capital lease obligations related to vehicles used in the French operations.
19
In connection with the pending sale of the Companys Argentina operations, approximately $9,174 at September 30, 2004 and $9,694 at December 31, 2003 were reclassified from mortgage notes and other debt to Liabilities of discontinued operations in the consolidated balance sheet. For additional information regarding this matter, see note sixteen to the consolidated financial statements.
On April 15, 2004, as required by the terms of the agreement, the Company repaid the remaining $111,190 of the 7.375% notes due 2004.
On April 22, 2004, the Company extinguished $200,000 aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% notes due 2005, pursuant to the Offer to Purchase, dated March 24, 2004. The Company paid $214,233 to the tendering holders, including a premium and accrued interest. As a result of the transaction, the Company recognized a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $10,831, recorded in (Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt, in the consolidated statement of operations. In early May 2004, the Company also purchased $8,650 aggregate principal amount of the 6.00% notes due 2005 in the open market. As a result of these transactions, the Company recognized a loss of $333, recorded in (Loss) gain on early extinguishment of debt, in the consolidated statement of operations.
Additional Debt Disclosures
At September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, the Company had deposited $188,176 and $95,325, respectively, in restricted, interest-bearing accounts that were pledged as collateral for various credit instruments and commercial commitments, including $135,000 included in Other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet which are held in escrow for settlement of certain litigation. The remaining $53,176 is included in Deferred charges and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet.
9. Derivatives
The Company occasionally participates in hedging activities using a variety of derivative instruments, including interest rate swap agreements, cross-currency swap agreements and forward exchange contracts. These instruments are used to hedge exposure to risk in the interest rate and foreign exchange rate markets. The Company has documented policies and procedures to monitor and control the use of derivative transactions, which may only be executed with a limited group of creditworthy financial institutions. The Company generally does not engage in derivative instruments for speculative or trading purposes, nor is it a party to leveraged derivatives.
During the first quarter of 2004, the Company executed certain forward exchange contracts, having an aggregate notional value of EUR 240,000 and a corresponding notional value of $300,011 to hedge its net foreign investment in France. Upon receipt of the net proceeds from the joint venture transaction, the Company settled these derivative instruments and recorded a gain of $8,919 in Other comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statement of stockholders equity, which was then recognized pursuant to the sale of the Companys operations in France in Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net in the consolidated statement of operations.
The Company also executed certain forward exchange contracts during the first half of 2004, having an aggregate notional value of GBP 22,436 and a corresponding notional value of $41,334, relating to the ultimate sale of its minority investment in and the repayment of its note receivable from a funeral and cemetery company in the United Kingdom. On April 8, 2004, the Company received the expected proceeds and settled these derivative instruments, recognizing a gain of $198, which was recorded in Other income, net in the consolidated statement of operations during the three months ended June 30, 2004.
The Company was not a party to any derivative instruments at September 30, 2004 or December 31, 2003.
10. Retirement Plans
The Company has a non-contributory, defined benefit pension plan covering approximately 40% of its United States employees (US Pension Plan), a supplemental retirement plan for certain current and former key employees (SERP), a supplemental retirement plan for officers and certain key employees (Senior SERP) and a retirement plan for certain non-employee directors (Directors Plan). The Company also has a 401(k) employee savings plan.
Effective January 1, 2004, the Company changed the accounting for gains and losses on its pension plan assets and obligations. The Company recognizes such gains and losses in its consolidated statement of operations in the year such gains and losses are incurred. Prior to January 1, 2004, the Company amortized the difference between actual and expected investment returns and actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except to the extent that settlements with employees required earlier recognition). For additional discussion of this accounting change, see note three to the consolidated financial statements.
20
Effective January 1, 2001, the Company curtailed its US Pension Plan, SERP, Senior SERP and Directors Plan. As these plans have been frozen, the participants do not earn additional benefit from additional years of service and the Company does not incur new service cost.
Retirement benefits for the US Pension Plan are generally based on years of service and compensation. Required contributions are actuarially determined amounts consistent with the funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Assets of the pension plan consist of core diversified and market neutral hedge funds, fixed income investments and marketable equity securities.
Retirement benefits under the SERP are based on years of service and average monthly compensation, reduced by benefits under the US Pension Plan and Social Security. The Senior SERP provides retirement benefits based on years of service and position. The Directors Plan provides for an annual benefit to directors following their retirement, based on a vesting schedule.
Most foreign employees are covered by their respective foreign government mandated or defined contribution plans that are adequately funded and are not considered significant to the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. The plans liabilities and their related costs are computed in accordance with the laws of the individual countries and appropriate actuarial practices.
The components of net periodic pension plan benefit cost for the three and nine months ended September 30 were as follows:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Service cost benefits earned during the period |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
633 | 2,474 | 5,123 | 7,422 | ||||||||||||
Return on plan assets |
(1,590 | ) | (1,702 | ) | (5,170 | ) | (5,106 | ) | ||||||||
Settlement/curtailment charge |
| 88 | | 264 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
47 | 46 | 137 | 138 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized net loss |
| 1,897 | | 5,690 | ||||||||||||
Recognized net actuarial gain |
(1,745 | ) | | (1,745 | ) | | ||||||||||
$ | (2,655 | ) | $ | 2,803 | $ | (1,655 | ) | $ | 8,408 | |||||||
The Company recorded net pension income of $1,655 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 based on actuarial information obtained from the Plans annual remeasurement as of September 30, 2004. Due to the write off of the $54,873 unrecognized net loss associated with the change in accounting principle on January 1, 2004, the Companys amortization of unrecognized net loss is $0 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $1,897 and $5,690 for the same periods of 2003.
The plans weighted-average assumptions used to determine the net pension expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 are as follows. The three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2004 reflect an adjustment based on results from the annual remeasurement. Due to the curtailment of the plans in 2001, the assumed rate of compensation increase is $0.
September 30, 2004 |
September 30, 2003 |
|||||||
Discount rate used to determine obligations and related interest cost |
6.00 | % | 6.25 | % | ||||
Assumed rate of return on plan assets |
8.00 | % | 9.00 | % |
SERP, Senior SERP and Directors Plan
The retirement benefits under the SERP, Senior SERP and Directors Plan are unfunded obligations of the Company. As of December 31, 2003, the benefit obligation of the SERP, Senior SERP and Directors Plan was $33,764; however, the Company holds various life insurance policies with the intent to use the proceeds or any cash value buildup from such policies to assist in meeting, at least to the extent of such assets, the Senior SERPs funding requirements. The face value of these insurance policies is approximately $51,082 while the cash surrender value of these insurance policies is approximately $33,470 as of September 30, 2004. In July 2004, the Company paid off an $11,383 loan and $517 in interest associated with these policies.
21
US Pension Plan
In March 2004, the Company voluntarily contributed $20,000 to the frozen US Pension Plan. The fair value of the plan assets as of September 30, 2004 is $88,383, compared to a projected benefit obligation of $110,649 at December 31, 2003. As a result of the previously mentioned accounting change, the minimum pension liability adjustment included in Accumulated other comprehensive loss was $0 as of September 30, 2004 compared to $33,599 at December 31, 2003.
The plans weighted-average asset allocations by asset category are as follows:
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
Core diversified and market neutral hedge funds |
54 | % | | |||||
Equity securities |
33 | % | 74 | % | ||||
Fixed income investments |
13 | % | 26 | % | ||||
Total |
100 | % | 100 | % |
Equity securities included shares of Company common stock in the amounts of $0 and $7,138 (nine percent of plan assets) at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, respectively. On March 31, 2004, the plan assets were rebalanced to include investments in core diversified and market neutral hedge funds.
The primary investment objective of the plan is to achieve a rate of investment return over time that will allow the plan to achieve a fully funded status, while maintaining prudent investment return volatility levels. In 2004, the investment strategy was revised to have a lower percentage invested in traditional equity securities and fixed income securities and instead include investments in hedge funds allowing for reduced volatility with limited reduction of returns. The Company has an asset allocation strategy of 35% traditional equity, 15% fixed income and 50% hedge funds. The investment strategy is managed within ranges that are centered at specific allocation targets. The specific allocations within the strategy, as well as individual asset class ranges are as follows:
Ranges |
||||
Large cap equity (value) |
10% - 25 | % | ||
Small cap growth (value) |
5% - 10 | % | ||
International equity |
5% - 10 | % | ||
Fixed income core bond |
0% - 25 | % | ||
Hedge funds: |
||||
Core diversified |
15% - 35 | % | ||
Market neutral |
15% - 35 | % | ||
Money market |
0% - 1 | % |
11. Segment Reporting
The Companys operations are both product and geographically based, and the reportable operating segments presented below include funeral and cemetery operations. The Companys geographic areas include North America, Europe and Other Foreign. Other Foreign consists of the Companys operations in Singapore and South America. Europe includes operations in Germany and France. The Company conducts both funeral and cemetery operations in the North America, Europe and Other Foreign geographic areas.
The Company has reclassified certain prior year amounts to conform to the current period presentation with no effect on previously reported results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.
22
The Companys reportable segment information is as follows:
Reportable | ||||||||||||
Funeral |
Cemetery |
segments |
||||||||||
Revenues from external customers: |
||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 266,715 | $ | 136,637 | $ | 403,352 | ||||||
2003 (Restated note 17) |
$ | 421,892 | $ | 144,569 | $ | 566,461 | ||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 982,148 | $ | 439,378 | $ | 1,421,526 | ||||||
2003 (Restated note 17) |
$ | 1,287,266 | $ | 442,071 | $ | 1,729,337 | ||||||
Gross profits: |
||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 44,774 | $ | 23,495 | $ | 68,269 | ||||||
2003 (Restated note 17) |
$ | 54,929 | $ | 14,017 | $ | 68,946 | ||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 183,045 | $ | 71,705 | $ | 254,750 | ||||||
2003 (Restated note 17) |
$ | 212,379 | $ | 66,157 | $ | 278,536 |
The following table reconciles gross profits from reportable segments to the Companys consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes and cumulative effects of accounting changes:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
(Restated | (Restated | |||||||||||||||
note 17) | note 17) | |||||||||||||||
Gross profits from reportable segments |
$ | 68,269 | $ | 68,946 | $ | 254,750 | $ | 278,536 | ||||||||
General and administrative expenses |
(25,298 | ) | (52,775 | ) | (100,347 | ) | (110,454 | ) | ||||||||
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net |
(3,281 | ) | (1,452 | ) | 33,018 | 5,413 | ||||||||||
Other operating income (expense) |
| | 6,932 | (1,724 | ) | |||||||||||
Operating income |
39,690 | 14,719 | 194,353 | 171,771 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(27,888 | ) | (34,835 | ) | (94,668 | ) | (107,968 | ) | ||||||||
Gain (loss) on early extinguishment of debt, net |
| 176 | (16,770 | ) | 2,079 | |||||||||||
Other income, net |
4,569 | 11,218 | 12,758 | 16,590 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income
taxes and cumulative effects of accounting changes |
$ | 16,371 | $ | (8,722 | ) | $ | 95,673 | $ | 82,472 | |||||||
23
The Companys geographic area information is as follows:
North | ||||||||||||||||
America |
Europe |
Other Foreign |
Total |
|||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers: |
||||||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 392,053 | $ | 1,648 | $ | 9,651 | $ | 403,352 | ||||||||
2003 (Restated note 17) |
$ | 408,385 | $ | 149,950 | $ | 8,126 | $ | 566,461 | ||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 1,263,119 | $ | 132,139 | $ | 26,268 | $ | 1,421,526 | ||||||||
2003 (Restated note 17) |
$ | 1,278,752 | $ | 429,245 | $ | 21,340 | $ | 1,729,337 | ||||||||
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net: |
||||||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | (3,476 | ) | $ | | $ | 195 | $ | (3,281 | ) | ||||||
2003 |
$ | (2,929 | ) | $ | 1,477 | $ | | $ | (1,452 | ) | ||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 32,926 | $ | 92 | $ | | $ | 33,018 | ||||||||
2003 |
$ | 7,262 | $ | (899 | ) | $ | (950 | ) | $ | 5,413 | ||||||
Other operating income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
2003 |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 6,932 | $ | | $ | | $ | 6,932 | ||||||||
2003 |
$ | (1,724 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | (1,724 | ) | ||||||
Operating income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 36,846 | $ | (79 | ) | $ | 2,923 | $ | 39,690 | |||||||
2003 (Restated note 17) |
$ | (5,592 | ) | $ | 17,829 | $ | 2,482 | $ | 14,719 | |||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 176,058 | $ | 11,501 | $ | 6,794 | $ | 194,353 | ||||||||
2003 (Restated note 17) |
$ | 115,314 | $ | 51,775 | $ | 4,682 | $ | 171,771 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization: |
||||||||||||||||
Three months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 32,063 | $ | | $ | 344 | $ | 32,407 | ||||||||
2003 (Restated note 17) |
$ | 42,279 | $ | | $ | 227 | $ | 42,506 | ||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2004 |
$ | 102,247 | $ | | $ | 1,360 | $ | 103,607 | ||||||||
2003 (Restated note 17) |
$ | 121,808 | $ | | $ | 312 | $ | 122,120 | ||||||||
Total assets at: |
||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2004 |
$ | 8,159,626 | $ | 8,275 | $ | 140,267 | $ | 8,308,168 | ||||||||
December 31, 2003 |
$ | 7,034,062 | $ | 543,141 | $ | 148,001 | $ | 7,725,204 |
Included in the North America figures above are the following United States amounts:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
(Restated | (Restated | |||||||||||||||
note 17) | note 17) | |||||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | 371,045 | $ | 387,965 | $ | 1,191,538 | $ | 1,220,145 | ||||||||
Other
operating income (expense) |
$ | | $ | | $ | 8,030 | $ | (1,724 | ) | |||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | 33,603 | $ | (7,722 | ) | $ | 160,513 | $ | 103,309 | |||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
$ | 30,543 | $ | 41,656 | $ | 96,642 | $ | 117,679 | ||||||||
Total assets (a) |
$ | 7,779,049 | $ | 6,801,492 | $ | 7,779,049 | $ | 6,801,492 |
(a) Prior year amounts are as of December 31, 2003.
24
Included in the Europe figures above are the following France amounts:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Revenues from external customers |
$ | | $ | 148,412 | $ | 127,282 | $ | 424,060 | ||||||||
Operating income |
$ | | $ | 17,578 | $ | 11,664 | $ | 51,081 | ||||||||
Total assets (a) |
$ | | $ | 535,222 | $ | | $ | 535,222 |
(a) Prior year amounts are as of December 31, 2003.
The changes in the carrying amounts of goodwill for the Companys two segments are as follows:
Funeral |
Cemetery |
Total |
||||||||||
Balance as of December 31, 2003 |
$ | 1,193,138 | $ | 2,284 | $ | 1,195,422 | ||||||
Acquisitions |
1,912 | | 1,912 | |||||||||
Dispositions |
(31,782 | ) | (20 | ) | (31,802 | ) | ||||||
Effects of foreign currency and other |
1,560 | | 1,560 | |||||||||
Balance as of September 30, 2004 |
$ | 1,164,828 | $ | 2,264 | $ | 1,167,092 |
12. Commitments and Contingencies
Payment of Purchase Obligations
In connection with certain acquisitions made by the Companys South America operations, the Company entered into contingent purchase obligations with certain former owners of those businesses. At December 31, 2003, the estimated $53,000 obligation was recorded in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. In July 2004, the Company paid $51,749 to satisfy this obligation.
Litigation
The Company is a party to various litigation matters, investigations and proceedings. For each of its outstanding legal matters, the Company evaluates the merits of the case, its exposure to the matter, possible legal or settlement strategies and the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome. If the Company determines that an unfavorable outcome is probable and can be estimated, it establishes the necessary accruals. Certain insurance policies held by the Company may reduce cash outflows with respect to an adverse outcome of these litigation matters. The Company accrues such insurance recoveries when they become probable of being paid and can be reasonably estimated. The following discussion describes certain litigation and proceedings as of November 5, 2004.
In Re Service Corporation International; Cause No. H-99-0280; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (the Consolidated Lawsuit). The Consolidated Lawsuit was filed in January 1999 and includes numerous separate lawsuits that were filed in various United States District Courts in Texas. The Consolidated Lawsuit has been certified as a class action and names as defendants the Company and three of the Companys current or former executive officers or directors (the Individual Defendants).
The Consolidated Lawsuit has been brought on behalf of all persons and entities who (i) acquired shares of Company common stock in the merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company into Equity Corporation International (ECI); (ii) purchased shares of Company common stock in the open market during the period from July 17, 1998 through January 26, 1999 (the Class Period); (iii) purchased Company call options in the open market during the Class Period; (iv) sold Company put options in the open market during the Class Period; (v) held employee stock options in ECI that became options to purchase Company common stock pursuant to the merger; and (vi) held Company employee stock options to purchase Company common stock under a stock plan during the Class Period. Excluded from the class definition categories are the Individual Defendants, the members of their immediate families and all other persons who were directors or executive officers of the Company or its affiliated entities at any time during the Class Period.
25
The plaintiffs in the Consolidated Lawsuit alleged that defendants violated federal securities laws by making materially false and misleading statements and failing to disclose material information concerning the Companys preneed funeral business and other financial matters, including in connection with the ECI merger. The Consolidated Lawsuit sought recovery of an unspecified amount of monetary damages. A Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Lawsuit filed by the Company and the Individual Defendants has been pending before the Court.
On April 20, 2004, the Company announced that it had entered into a memorandum of understanding to settle the Consolidated Lawsuit. The terms of the proposed settlement call for the Company to cause to be created a settlement fund in May 2004 totaling $65,000 in settlement of the claims. The Company and its insurance carriers have also entered into an agreement providing for the payment by the Companys insurance carriers of $30,000 towards this settlement, which resulted in direct payments made by the Company of approximately $35,000.
As a result of this proposed settlement, the Company recognized litigation related expenses in General and administrative expenses, net of amounts to be funded into escrow by the insurance carriers, of approximately $35,000 on a pretax basis in the first quarter of 2004. During the second quarter of 2004, the Company deposited $35,000 into escrow for this proposed settlement. This amount is included in Other current assets with a corresponding liability in Accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet. At a hearing on November 4, 2004, the court entered an order approving the settlement. Subject to appeal, all claims under the Consolidated Lawsuit have been dismissed. The Company may also have additional potential liability for those who have opted out of the Consolidated Lawsuit. The most significant opt out claim is the subject of the T. Rowe Price Lawsuit discussed below.
Several other related lawsuits have been filed against the Company and the Individual Defendants in Texas state courts by former SCI and ECI shareholders. These lawsuits include the following matters:
No. 31820-99-2; Charles Fredrick v. Service Corp. International; In the District Court of Angelina County, Texas, filed February 16, 1999.
No. 2004-28511; Thomas G. Conway, John T Conway and Trust U/W/O George M. Conway, Jr. v. Service Corporation International; In the 127th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, filed May 28, 2004 (the Conway Lawsuit).
No. 2004-429637; T. Rowe Price Balanced Fund, Inc., et al. v. Service Corporation International, et al; In the 270th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas, filed June 7, 2004 (the T. Rowe Price Lawsuit).
These lawsuits allege, among other things, violations of Texas securities law and statutory and common law fraud, and seek compensatory and exemplary damages. The plaintiffs in the Conway Lawsuit have not opted out of the Consolidated Lawsuit, and therefore they are precluded from prosecuting the Conway Lawsuit. For that reason, the Company expects the Conway Lawsuit to be dismissed in the near future. The plaintiffs in the other lawsuits have opted out of the Consolidated Lawsuit. In the other lawsuits, no discovery has occurred and the Company is unable to determine whether an adverse outcome is probable. The Company intends to aggressively defend such lawsuits.
The plaintiffs in the T. Rowe Price Lawsuit consist of investment companies and trust funds who were former ECI and SCI shareholders and who have opted out of the proposed settlement of the Consolidated Lawsuit. They allege that the Company and the Individual Defendants violated the Texas Securities Act by making materially false and misleading statements and failing to disclose material information concerning the Companys business and other financial matters, including in connection with the ECI merger. The T. Rowe Price Lawsuit seeks recovery of at least $32,000 in actual damages plus unspecified exemplary damages.
The plaintiffs in the Conway Lawsuit also filed a separate arbitration styled Thomas G. Conway et al v. Service Corporation International, et al; Cause No. 70 Y 168 00748 02 before the American Arbitration Association (AAA) (Conway action). The Conway action raised claims distinct from those claims alleged in the Conway Lawsuit. The Company has recently settled the Conway action.
Joan Light, Shirley Eisenbert and Carol Prisco v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Menorah Gardens & Funeral Chapels, and Service Corporation International; Case No. 01-21376 CA 08; In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, General Jurisdiction Division (Consumer Lawsuit). The Consumer Lawsuit was filed December 19, 2001 and named the Company, a subsidiary and other related entities as defendants. On August 19, 2003, the Court certified a class
26
comprising all persons with burial plots or family members buried at Menorah Gardens & Funeral Chapels in Florida. Excluded from the class definition were persons whose claims had been reduced to judgment or had been settled as of the date of class certification. The defendants appealed the trial courts order regarding class certification.
The plaintiffs alleged that defendants had failed to exercise reasonable care in handling remains by secretly: (i) dumping remains in a wooded area; (ii) burying remains in locations other than the ones purchased; (iii) crushing vaults to make room for other vaults; (iv) burying remains on top of the other or head to foot rather than side-by-side; (v) moving remains; and (vi) co-mingling remains.
The plaintiffs in the Consumer Lawsuit alleged that the above conduct constituted negligence, tortious interference with the handling of dead bodies, infliction of emotional distress, and violation of industry specific state statutes, as well as the states Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act. The plaintiffs sought an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages. The Court granted plaintiffs motion for leave to amend their complaint to include punitive damages. Plaintiffs also sought equitable/injunctive relief in the form of a permanent injunction requiring defendants to fund a court supervised program that provides for monitoring and studying of the cemetery and any disturbed remains to insure their proper disposition.
Counsel for plaintiffs in the Consumer Lawsuit also represented individuals who filed numerous separate lawsuits setting forth individual claims similar to those in the Consumer Lawsuit. These lawsuits include Sheldon Cohen, surviving son of Hymen Cohen, deceased v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc., d/b/a Menorah Gardens & Funeral Chapels and Service Corporation International; Case No. 02014679; In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida, and Marian Novins, surviving daughter of Harold Wells deceased v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Menorah Gardens & Funeral Chapels, and Service Corporation International; Case No. 0307886; In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and for Broward County, Florida, General Jurisdiction Division.
In December 2003, the Company entered into an agreement in principle to settle the Consumer Lawsuit and the above individual related lawsuits. A settlement agreement pertaining specifically to the Consumer Lawsuit was filed with the court on March 2, 2004. On October 28, 2004, the Court entered an order approving the settlement. Subject to appeal, all claims under the Consumer Lawsuit have been dismissed. The terms of the proposed settlement call for the Company to make payments totaling approximately $100,000 in settlement of these claims. As of December 31, 2003, the Company had recorded reserves of $100,000 relating to this matter. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recognized a receivable of $25,000 for expected recoveries under one primary layer of the Companys insurance coverage related to the litigation. During the first quarter of 2004, the Company deposited $100,000 into escrow for this proposed settlement. This amount is included in Other current assets with a corresponding liability in Accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.
On April 21, 2002, additional plaintiffs filed a lawsuit styled Sol Guralnick, Linda Weinr, Joan Nix, Gilda Schwartz, Paul Schwartz, Ann Ferrante, Steve Schwartz, Nancy Backlund, Jamie Osit, Corey King, Marc King, Barbara Feinberg Clark v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. d/b/a Menorah Gardens and Funeral Chapels and Service Corporation International; In the Circuit Court in the 15th Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida; Case number CA024815AE (Guralnick Lawsuit), making essentially the same allegations as the Consumer Lawsuit with the exception that it does not contain class allegations. In addition to the Guralnick Lawsuit, counsel filed a lawsuit containing cemetery mismanagement allegations styled Diane Wolff, Arlene Benowitz, Michael Wolff, Randee Wolff Blumstein, and Martha Freedberg v. SCI, Funeral Services of Florida, Inc. a Florida corporation d/b/a Menorah Gardens & Funeral Chapels, Service Corporation International, a Texas Corporation, Menorah Partnership, a Florida General Partnership, and Sharon Gardens Limited Partnership, a Florida Limited Partnership; In the Circuit Court in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida, Case No. 2003CA013025 (Wolff Lawsuit).
In October 2004, the Company reached an agreement for settlement of the Guralnick and Wolff Lawsuits.
Conley Investment Counsel v. Service Corporation International, et al; Civil Action 04-MD-1609; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (the 2003 Securities Lawsuit). The 2003 Securities Lawsuit resulted from the transfer and consolidation by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation of three lawsuitsEdgar Neufeld v. Service Corporation International, et.al,; Cause No. CV-S-03-1561-HDM-PAL; In the United States District Court for the District of Nevada; and Rujira Srisythemp v. Service Corporation International, et. al.; Cause No. CV-S-03-1392-LDG-LRL; In the United States District for the District of Nevada; and Joshua Ackerman v. Service Corporation International, et. al.; Cause No. 04-CV-20114; In the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit names as defendants the Company and three of the
27
Companys current and former executive officers or directors. The 2003 Securities Lawsuit is a purported class action filed in connection with the circumstances surrounding the Consumer Lawsuit. The plaintiffs allege that the Company failed to disclose, or falsely stated, material information relating to the circumstances surrounding the Consumer Lawsuit. Since the action is in its preliminary stages, no discovery has occurred, and the Company cannot quantify its ultimate liability, if any, for the payment of damages. The Company intends to aggressively defend itself in the 2003 Securities Lawsuit.
David Hijar v. SCI Texas Funeral Services, Inc., SCI Funeral Services, Inc., and Service Corporation International.; In the County Court of El Paso, County, Texas, County Court at Law Number Three; Cause Number 2002-740 (Hijar Lawsuit). The Hijar Lawsuit is a putative class action brought on behalf of all persons, entities and organizations who purchased funeral services from the Company or its subsidiaries at any time since March 18, 1998. Plaintiffs allege that federal and Texas funeral related rules (Rules) required the Company to disclose its markups on all items obtained from third parties in connection with funeral service contracts and that the failure to make required disclosures of markups resulted in fraud and other legal claims. The Company believes that the plaintiffs interpretation of the Rules is incorrect. The Hijar Lawsuit seeks to recover an unspecified amount of monetary damages. The plaintiffs counsel has pursued two arbitration claims raising similar issues in California. The Company has recently filed a complaint for declaratory relief in Federal District Court for the Central District of California relating to these arbitration claims.
Each side in the Hijar Lawsuit filed motions to summarily establish that its interpretation of the Rules was correct, and the judge has ruled in favor of the plaintiffs. This ruling allows the plaintiffs to proceed with the case. No class has been certified.
The International Cemetery and Funeral Association, the Texas Funeral Directors Association, the National Funeral Directors Association, the National Funeral Directors and Morticians Association, Inc., the Texas Funeral Service Commission, and three industry competitors filed Amicus Curiae briefs asserting that their interpretation of the Rules was the same as the defendants. Additionally, the Federal Trade Commission provided the Company with an informal staff opinion supporting the defendants argument.
The ultimate outcome of the Hijar Lawsuit cannot be determined at this time. However, the Company intends to aggressively defend this lawsuit.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, the Company accrued approximately $9,000 for litigation related matters described in this note twelve. The Company has substantial face amount of insurance coverage which it believes is applicable to these litigation related matters. There are various unresolved coverage issues relative to such insurance, and the Company is currently involved in litigation with certain of its insurance carriers regarding these matters. For that reason, the Company has not accrued an estimated receivable for insurance recoveries other than the $25,000 receivable recorded in the fourth quarter of 2003 as described above. Such receivables are recorded when they are probable of being paid and can be reasonably estimated.
No assurance can be given regarding the ultimate outcome of these proceedings. Certain insurance policies held by the Company may reduce cash outflows with respect to an adverse outcome of these litigation related matters. If an adverse decision in these matters exceeds the insurance coverage or if the insurance coverage is deemed not to apply to these matters or if an insurance carrier is unable to pay, an adverse decision could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
13. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share (EPS) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other obligations to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that then shared in our earnings.
28
A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations is presented below:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
(Restated | (Restated | |||||||||||||||
note 17) | note 17) | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
cumulative effects of accounting changes
(numerator): |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
cumulative effects of accounting changes basic |
$ | 12,292 | $ | (5,391 | ) | $ | 100,141 | $ | 52,657 | |||||||
After tax interest on convertible debt |
| | 6,419 | | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before
cumulative effects of accounting changes
diluted |
$ | 12,292 | $ | (5,391 | ) | $ | 106,560 | $ | 52,657 | |||||||
Net income (loss) (numerator): |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) basic |
$ | 12,576 | $ | (4,732 | ) | $ | 87,455 | $ | 54,662 | |||||||
Interest on convertible debt |
| | 6,419 | | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) diluted |
$ | 12,576 | $ | (4,732 | ) | $ | 93,874 | $ | 54,662 | |||||||
Shares (denominator): |
||||||||||||||||
Shares basic |
336,590 | 300,507 | 315,656 | 299,221 | ||||||||||||
Stock options |
3,588 | | 4,143 | 621 | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
37 | | 48 | | ||||||||||||
Convertible debt |
| | 29,047 | | ||||||||||||
Shares diluted |
340,215 | 300,507 | 348,894 | 299,842 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share
before cumulative effects of accounting changes: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .32 | $ | .18 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .31 | $ | .18 | |||||||
Net income (loss) per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .28 | $ | .18 | |||||||
Diluted |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .27 | $ | .18 | |||||||
The computation of diluted earnings per share excludes outstanding stock options and convertible debt in certain periods in which the inclusion of such items would be antidilutive in the periods presented. Total options and convertible debt not currently included in the computation of dilutive earnings per share are as follows:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Antidilutive options |
13,436 | 20,151 | 10,204 | 24,067 | ||||||||||||
Antidilutive convertible debt |
1,012 | 46,702 | 859 | 47,276 | ||||||||||||
Total common stock equivalents excluded from
computation |
14,448 | 66,853 | 11,063 | 71,343 | ||||||||||||
14. Stockholders Equity
Stock Options
The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation expense under the intrinsic value method. Under this method, no compensation expense is recognized on stock options if the grant price equals the market value on the date of grant.
29
If the Company had elected to recognize compensation expense for its option plans based on the fair value method, net income and per share amounts would have changed to the pro forma amounts indicated below.
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
(Restated | (Restated | |||||||||||||||
note 17) | note 17) | |||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 12,576 | $ | (4,732 | ) | $ | 87,455 | $ | 54,662 | |||||||
Deduct: Total additional stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value
based method for all awards, net of related tax
expense |
(806 | ) | (2,230 | ) | (2,407 | ) | (6,730 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) |
$ | 11,770 | $ | (6,962 | ) | $ | 85,048 | $ | 47,932 | |||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .28 | $ | .18 | |||||||
Deduct: Total additional stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value
based method for all awards, net of related tax
expense |
(.00 | ) | (.00 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.02 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma basic earnings (loss) per share |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .27 | $ | .16 | |||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .27 | $ | .18 | |||||||
Deduct: Total additional stock-based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value
based method for all awards, net of related tax
expense |
(.00 | ) | (.00 | ) | (.01 | ) | (.02 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma diluted earnings (loss) per share |
$ | .04 | $ | (.02 | ) | $ | .26 | $ | .16 | |||||||
The fair value of the Companys stock options used to compute the pro forma net income and per share disclosures is determined by calculating the estimated fair value at grant date using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss are as follows:
Foreign | Minimum | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||
currency | pension | Unrealized | other | |||||||||||||
translation | liability | gains | comprehensive | |||||||||||||
adjustment |
adjustment |
and losses |
loss |
|||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2003 |
$ | (78,084 | ) | $ | (33,599 | ) | $ | | $ | (111,683 | ) | |||||
Activity in 2004 |
(25,427 | ) | 33,599 | | 8,172 | |||||||||||
Reduction in net unrealized gains associated
with available-for-sale securities of the
trusts |
| | (63,894 | ) | (63,894 | ) | ||||||||||
Reclassification of net unrealized gains
activity attributable to the
non-controlling
interest holders |
| | 63,894 | 63,894 | ||||||||||||
Reclassification for translation adjustment
realized in net income |
49,006 | | | 49,006 | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2004 |
$ | (54,505 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | (54,505 | ) | ||||||
Balance at December 31, 2002 |
$ | (170,591 | ) | $ | (36,555 | ) | $ | | $ | (207,146 | ) | |||||
Activity in 2003 |
61,883 | | | 61,883 | ||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2003 |
$ | (108,708 | ) | $ | (36,555 | ) | $ | | $ | (145,263 | ) | |||||
30
The reclassification adjustment of $49,006 during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 relates to the sale of 75% of the Companys interest in its French operations. Included in the Foreign currency translation adjustment at September 30, 2004 are net currency losses of $67,326 related to discontinued operations of the Companys Argentina operations held for sale at September 30, 2004.
The components of Comprehensive income are as follows:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
(Restated | (Restated | |||||||||||||||
note 17) | note 17) | |||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 12,576 | $ | (4,732 | ) | $ | 87,455 | $ | 54,662 | |||||||
Total other comprehensive income |
16,978 | 16,321 | 57,178 | 61,883 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 29,554 | $ | 11,589 | $ | 144,633 | $ | 116,545 | ||||||||
Share Repurchase Program
On August 16, 2004, the Company announced a share repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to $100,000 to repurchase its common stock. The Company, subject to market conditions and normal trading restrictions, makes purchases in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. During the third quarter of 2004, the Company repurchased 5,612 shares of common stock at a cost of $34,812.
15. Gains and Impairment (Losses) on Dispositions and Other Operating Expenses
Gains and Impairment (Losses) on Dispositions for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
As dispositions occur in the normal course of business, gains or losses on the sale of such businesses are recognized in the income statement line item Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net. Additionally, as dispositions occur related to the Companys ongoing asset sale programs, adjustments are made through this income statement line item to reflect the difference between actual proceeds received from the sale compared to the original estimates.
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net consists of the following:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Gains on dispositions, net |
$ | 1,022 | $ | 7,808 | $ | 59,433 | $ | 21,148 | ||||||||
Impairment losses for assets held for sale |
(6,486 | ) | (13,327 | ) | (28,580 | ) | (27,706 | ) | ||||||||
Changes to previously estimated
impairment losses |
2,183 | 4,067 | 2,165 | 11,971 | ||||||||||||
$ | (3,281 | ) | $ | (1,452 | ) | $ | 33,018 | $ | 5,413 | |||||||
Previous Years Charges
The Companys previous years charges (in 2002, 2001 and 1999) included severance costs related to cost rationalization programs and terminated contractual relationships of former employees and executive officers, planned divestitures of certain North America and international funeral service and cemetery businesses, reductions in carrying values of equity investments, market value adjustments for certain options associated with the Companys senior notes and relieving certain individuals from their consulting and/or covenant-not-to-compete contractual obligations.
The majority of the remaining balance at September 30, 2004 of these original charge amounts relate to severance costs on completed actions and terminated consulting and/or covenant-not-to-compete contractual obligations, which will be paid by 2012. Of the $34,082 remaining liability at September 30, 2004, $10,564 is included in Accounts payable and accrued liabilities and $23,518 is
31
included in Other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet based on the expected timing of payments. The Company continues to adjust the estimates of certain items included in the original charge amounts as better estimates become available or actual divestitures occur.
The activity related to these previous years charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 is detailed below. Any adjustments made during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 to the original impairment charge amounts were recognized in the income statement line item Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net, as described above.
Utilization for nine | ||||||||||||||||||||
months ended | ||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Original charge | Balance at | Balance at | ||||||||||||||||||
amount |
December 31, 2003 |
Cash |
Non-cash |
September 30, 2004 |
||||||||||||||||
Fourth Quarter 1999 Charge |
$ | 272,544 | $ | 18,282 | $ | 5,364 | $ | 60 | $ | 12,858 | ||||||||||
2001 Charges |
663,548 | 3,102 | 380 | 811 | 1,911 | |||||||||||||||
2002 Charges |
292,979 | 24,395 | 4,907 | 175 | 19,313 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,229,071 | $ | 45,779 | $ | 10,651 | $ | 1,046 | $ | 34,082 | ||||||||||
Sale of French Operations
On March 11, 2004, the Company completed a joint venture transaction of its funeral operations in France. In addition to maintaining a 25% share of the total equity capital of the newly formed entity, the Company received net cash proceeds of $287,886, net of transaction costs, and a note receivable in the amount of EUR 10,000. The transaction resulted in a pretax gain of $12,639, recorded in Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net, in the consolidated statement of operations, and a non-cash tax benefit of $24,929, which were recognized in the quarter ended March 31, 2004. In July 2004, the Company paid $6,318, pursuant to the joint venture agreement, as a purchase price adjustment for the sale of its French operations, which reduced the pretax gain to $6,420 and the after tax gain to $33,624. Included in the pretax gain, the Company recognized $35,768 of contractual obligations related to representation and warranties and other indemnifications resulting from the joint venture contract. Goodwill in the amount of $23,467 was removed from the Companys consolidated balance sheet as a result of this transaction. For further information regarding the sale of its French operations, including pro forma financial information, see the Companys Form 8-K filed on September 2, 2004.
Proceeds from Investment in United Kingdom Company
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company received proceeds of $53,839 from the sale of its minority interest equity investment in the United Kingdom and the prepayment of its note receivable, with accrued interest, following a successful public offering transaction of its United Kingdom company.
The Company recognized income of $27,179, recorded in Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net, in the consolidated statement of operations as of March 31, 2004, to adjust the carrying amount of the receivable to its realizable value. In addition, the Company recognized interest income on the receivable, in the amount of $4,478 recorded in Other income, net in the consolidated statement of operations as of March 31, 2004. In the second quarter of 2004, the Company recorded a pretax gain of $13,984 in Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net in the consolidated statement of operations, as a result of the sale and recognized a non-cash tax benefit of $8,000.
16. Discontinued Operations
The Company committed to a plan during the second quarter of 2004 to divest its existing funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina and Uruguay. The Company is actively marketing these operations. The Company plans to have no continuing interest in these operations subsequent to disposal of the Argentina and Uruguay businesses. Therefore, these operations were classified as discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2004.
Impairment of Argentina
During the second quarter of 2004, the Company recorded an impairment of its funeral and cemetery operations in Argentina in the amount of $15,189 recorded in Loss from discontinued operations in the consolidated statement of operations. The new carrying
32
amount reflects the estimated fair value based on current market conditions less costs to sell. Additionally, the Company recognized a non-cash tax benefit of $49,236 in discontinued operations during the three months ended June 30, 2004. This tax benefit represents the reduction of a previously recorded valuation allowance.
The results of the Companys discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 were as follows:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 1,225 | $ | 3,744 | $ | 8,534 | $ | 9,974 | ||||||||
Gains and impairment (losses) on dispositions, net |
| 29 | (15,189 | ) | 979 | |||||||||||
Other costs and expenses |
(800 | ) | (3,002 | ) | (6,785 | ) | (8,612 | ) | ||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before
income taxes |
425 | 771 | (13,440 | ) | 2,341 | |||||||||||
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
141 | 112 | (48,815 | ) | 336 | |||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
$ | 284 | $ | 659 | $ | 35,375 | $ | 2,005 | ||||||||
Net (liabilities) and assets of discontinued operations at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 were as follows:
September 30, 2004 |
December 31, 2003 |
|||||||
Assets: |
||||||||
Receivables, net of allowances |
$ | 3,402 | $ | 4,096 | ||||
Other current assets |
2,406 | 2,005 | ||||||
Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments |
1,399 | 1,601 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, net |
446 | 376 | ||||||
Deferred charges and other assets |
2,495 | 1,240 | ||||||
Total assets |
10,148 | 9,318 | ||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
1,294 | 1,107 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities and other current liabilities |
7,893 | 6,493 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
9,174 | 9,694 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
13,498 | 13,026 | ||||||
Other liabilities and deferred credits |
46,975 | 31,210 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
78,834 | 61,530 | ||||||
Net liabilities of discontinued operations |
(68,686 | ) | (52,212 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation |
67,326 | 71,001 | ||||||
Net (liabilities) assets of discontinued operations, net of
foreign currency translation |
$ | (1,360 | ) | $ | 18,789 | |||
17. Restatement of Financial Statements
33
The Company restated its previously issued financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, the interim quarters of 2000, 2001 and 2002, and the first three quarters of 2003, related to adjustments to Deferred preneed cemetery revenues and changes in the methodology for amortizing preneed funeral deferred selling costs. See the Companys current report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2004, which superseded the annual report on Form 10-K filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2003 for complete disclosures relating to this restatement of the Companys financial statements. All applicable amounts relating to these restatements have been reflected in the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements.
The effect of the restatement on the Companys previously reported consolidated statement of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 was as follows:
Three months ended | Nine months ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, |
September 30, |
|||||||||||||||
As Reported |
As Restated |
As Reported |
As Restated |
|||||||||||||
2003 | ||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 567,357 | $ | 566,461 | $ | 1,727,462 | $ | 1,729,337 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses |
499,789 | 497,515 | 1,454,790 | 1,450,801 | ||||||||||||
Gross profits |
67,568 | 68,946 | 272,672 | 278,536 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
13,341 | 14,719 | 165,906 | 171,771 | ||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations before
income taxes and cumulative effects of
accounting
changes |
(10,100 | ) | (8,722 | ) | 76,608 | 82,472 | ||||||||||
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
(3,865 | ) | (3,331 | ) | 27,541 | 29,815 | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
(5,576 | ) | (4,732 | ) | 51,072 | 54,662 | ||||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic EPS |
(.02 | ) | (.02 | ) | .17 | .18 | ||||||||||
Diluted EPS |
(.02 | ) | (.02 | ) | .17 | .18 |
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
Service Corporation International (SCI or the Company) is the worlds largest provider of funeral and cemetery services. At September 30, 2004, we operated 1,244 funeral service locations and 412 cemeteries. We also had a minority interest equity investment in funeral operations in France. In addition to our funeral and cemetery operations, we own Kenyon International Emergency Services, a disaster response team that engages in mass fatality and emergency response services.
Our funeral and cemetery operations are organized into a North America division covering the United States and Canada, and a Foreign division including operations in South America, Germany and Singapore. For the quarter ended September 30, 2004, our North America operations represented approximately 97% of our consolidated revenues and consolidated gross profits.
Our operations in the North America division are organized into 32 major markets and 44 middle markets. Each market is led by a market director with responsibility for funeral and cemetery operations and preneed sales. Within each market, the funeral homes and cemeteries realize efficiencies by sharing common resources such as personnel, preparation services and vehicles. There are three market support centers in North America to assist market directors with financial, administrative and human resource needs. These support centers are located in Houston, New York and Los Angeles. The primary functions of the market support centers are to help facilitate the execution of corporate strategies, coordinate communications between the field and corporate offices and serve as liaisons for implementation of policies and procedures.
Strengths and Challenges
SCI is the leading provider of funeral, cremation and cemetery services in North America. While there are four other publicly-traded companies that operate in our industry, we have more funeral homes and cemeteries and serve more consumers than the rest of the public peer group combined. Despite some consolidation, the industry remains fragmented. We estimate that the other three public companies and SCI combined generate approximately 20% of total industry revenue. The other 80% is generated by independent funeral and cemetery operators.
34
In 2000, we launched the first national branding strategy in the funeral service industry in North America under the name Dignity Memorial®. While this branding process is intended to emphasize our seamless national network of funeral service locations and cemeteries, the original names associated with acquired locations generally remain the same. For example, Geo. H. Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors is now Geo. H. Lewis & Sons Funeral Directors, a Dignity Memorial® provider. We believe SCI is the only company in our industry that has successfully implemented a national brand. We believe that a national brand gives us a competitive advantage. This is discussed further in our strategies for growth described below.
Our core business can be described as stable. It has favorable demographic characteristics due to the aging of America. It also has relatively predictable revenue and cash flow streams. This stability is enhanced by a large backlog of deferred revenues associated with North America preneed funeral and cemetery sales. However, we and others in the industry face certain challenges in growing revenues. The primary external factors affecting revenue growth are a lack of near-term expansion in the number of deaths and an increasing trend toward cremation. Although the United States Census Bureau projects that the numbers of deaths will grow between 0.7% and 0.8% annually through 2010, modern advances in medicine and healthier lifestyles could reduce the numbers of deaths during this time.
In North America, social trends, religious changes, environmental issues and cultural preferences are driving an increasing preference for cremation. SCI is the largest provider of cremation services in North America. Approximately 40% of the total funeral services we perform are cremation services as compared to the national average of approximately 30%. Our cremation mix is greater due to the high concentration of properties we own along the west coast of the United States, Florida, and Arizona where cremation rates exceed 45%. The rate of cremation in North America has been increasing approximately 100 to 150 basis points each year and we expect this trend to continue in the near term. Cremation services historically have generated less revenue and gross profit dollars than traditional funeral services. Additionally, the cremation consumer may choose not to purchase cemetery property or merchandise. We believe we are well positioned to respond to this trend and have experienced initial success through the use of contemporary marketing strategies and unique product and service offerings that specifically appeal to cremation consumers. See the further discussion regarding initiatives to address cremation as part of our overall revenue growth strategy described below.
The Path to Growth
We have made substantial progress in reducing debt and improving cash flow since 1999. Our current capital structure and liquidity afford us significant financial flexibility. Our primary focus has now shifted to initiatives that will grow revenues and earnings. In the near term, we believe that cost reduction efforts will be the main means to improve earnings. We believe strategies centered on our national brand, Dignity Memorial®, and other revenue growth initiatives can provide the framework for sustainable growth over the longer term.
Improving the Infrastructure
Historically we have had an infrastructure that did not allow us to realize fully the inherent efficiencies of our business organization. As a result, we were unable to enjoy all of the benefits of standardization, technology, and process improvement. Recently we have been moving to capitalize more fully on the inherent economies of scale of our business by reformulating our infrastructure. This has been accomplished by redesigning our sales organization, improving business and financial processes, outsourcing certain of our accounting functions including accounts payable and payroll, and expanding our existing trust administration and information technology outsourcing programs. We also began to implement a new information system in our field locations. This new system will replace three separate contract entry systems and integrate these functions into one.
Having simplified our sales approach and redesigned our financial, technical and administrative infrastructure, we were able to make significant changes to the field management structure in late 2003. The former management structure consisted of multiple layers and two organizations (sales and operations). The new management structure is based on a major market and middle market concept with the understanding that our markets and businesses are not all the same and can benefit from different management approaches. We eliminated the dual management organizational structure, and now have one person responsible for each market who has the ability to lead in a multi-segment environment. This individual is charged with the responsibility of growing our business and maintaining a commitment to the Dignity Memorial® standards and brand.
35
Building the Brand
SCI implemented the first national brand in the funeral service industry. This brand is called Dignity Memorial®. Internally, we are focused on ensuring that we have consistency in service standards and processes across our network of businesses. We want every customer interaction to be the standard Dignity interaction, which is based upon values of integrity, respect, enduring relationships and service excellence. Externally, we continue to enhance signage and local advertising efforts using the Dignity® name and logo, and we also sponsor several nationally recognized community programs. In 2003, we initiated a national advertising and marketing program to build awareness of our national brand name. Through broadcast and cable television, newspapers, yellow pages and direct mail media, this program focuses on the distinct benefits and values that set Dignity Memorial® apart from other providers.
Based on our market studies, we believe todays funeral consumers are less interested in traditional funeral products and more interested in creating a life celebration experience as well as receiving professional help to deal with the administrative and legal challenges which occur when a loved one dies. Through our Dignity® brand we are developing more contemporary and comprehensive products and services that we believe will help the consumer through the entire experience. Some of the exclusive items offered through Dignity® providers include grief counseling services, legal services, internet memorial archive capabilities, and the Aftercare® Planner a comprehensive organizing system that helps families manage the many business details that arise after a death occurs. Dignity® benefits also include the Bereavement Travel Program, a unique feature that allows customers to obtain special rates on airfare, car rentals and hotel accommodations for family and friends who must travel from out of town to attend funeral, cremation or memorial services. Importantly, these products and services appeal to both burial and cremation consumers. We are also focusing on programs that offer consumers new ways to personalize funeral services and create value in the experience.
Growing Our Revenues
As described earlier, we believe improvements in our cost structure will increase earnings in the near term; however, we also realize that to achieve sustainable long-term earnings growth, we must also increase our revenues. We believe we can be successful in this regard by developing the Dignity® brand and listening to our customers.
Enhancing Sales Opportunities
We believe we can grow core revenues by utilizing technology and contemporary marketing techniques to enhance our sales opportunities and strengthen the competitive advantage of our national brand name. In this regard, particular focus is being placed on selling Dignity Memorial® packaged funeral and cremation plans. We are also developing product differentiation within our cemeteries and enhancing our cremation strategies.
Our national brand name also represents a unique set of packaged funeral and cremation plans offered exclusively through our network on an atneed and preneed basis. These packages are designed to simplify customer decision-making and include the unique value-added products and services described earlier which have traditionally been unavailable through funeral service locations. Our customer satisfaction index, as measured by independent surveys completed by consumers three weeks following a funeral, continues to reach record levels, which we believe are largely attributable to the value and savings consumers receive when they select a Dignity® package. We believe we can increase the selection rate of these packaged plans through improved merchandising strategies that place less emphasis on traditional funeral merchandise and more focus on the comprehensive product and service offerings unique to Dignity Memorial® providers.
We are also beginning to use more contemporary marketing techniques within our cemetery segment. Initiatives are underway to employ a tiered-product model that emphasizes a wide range of product and service offerings. We are particularly focusing on the development of high-end cemetery property projects such as private family estates. We believe this initiative will be a key driver of cemetery revenue growth in 2005.
To grow core revenues and profits, we believe we must capitalize on the opportunities provided by the growing cremation trend. We believe a successful cremation strategy is built on product differentiation, personalization and simplicity. Along with the sale of
36
Dignity Memorial® cremation plans, we are developing new displays to be used in the arrangement process that clearly explain the products and services available to cremation consumers. Within the cemetery segment, we are promoting cremation gardens, which are separate sections located within certain of our cemeteries where cremated remains can be permanently placed and that contain other unique memorialization products. We continue to develop our national brand, National Cremation®, which targets the direct cremation consumer. And finally, comprehensive training programs are being developed to support these key initiatives, as well as to focus on creating a personal and meaningful experience for the cremation consumer.
Increasing Market Share
We believe that SCI has opportunities to grow market share due to its size and geographic diversity. We believe that a national brand name will provide us access to new customers over the long term given the increasingly mobile nature of North Americans. In addition, we will continue to capitalize on our nationwide network of providers to develop affinity relationships with large groups of individuals to whom we can market our products and services. Such relationships include employers, social organizations and insurance companies. Our most strategic affinity partnership today is with the Veterans of Foreign Wars and Ladies Auxiliary whose membership exceeds two million. Over the longer term, we believe such groups can be a key influence in the funeral home selection process.
In late 2003, we eliminated the dual management structures of sales and operations and replaced them with a single-line business management structure. In addition to reducing costs, our new structure is intended to have our strongest business managers focused on producing results in each of our markets. Under the new structure, many of the administrative and financial functions are now handled by support centers. The geographical scope of responsibility of these managers has also been narrowed. We believe this new structure allows for greater focus on developing people, growing market share and improving profitability.
We are also targeting expansion through acquisition or construction in the top 150 markets in North America where probable investment returns will exceed our cost of capital. We will focus future growth capital deployment in the major metropolitan markets where there is a large population base and where multiple businesses are more conducive to clustering and contemporary marketing strategies and where it is easier to attract quality management. Over the longer term, the potential for a franchising opportunity exists for further expansion in the smaller markets.
Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Changes
Our consolidated financial statements are impacted by the accounting policies used and the estimates and assumptions made by management during their preparation. Estimates and assumptions affect the carrying values of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the balance sheet date. Actual results could differ from such estimates due to uncertainties associated with the methods and assumptions underlying our critical accounting measurements. The following discussion of our critical accounting policies and estimates should be read in conjunction with our current report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2004, which superseded our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.
In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) reached consensus on the guidance provided by Emerging Issues Task force Issue 03-1 (EITF 03-1), The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments. The guidance is applicable to debt and equity securities that are within the scope of FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 115, Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities: and Certain Other Investments. EITF 03-1 specifies that an impairment would be considered other-than-temporary unless (a) the investor has the ability and intent to hold an investment for a reasonable period of time sufficient for the recovery of the fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the investment and (b) evidence indicating the cost of the investment is recoverable within a reasonable period of time outweighs evidence to the contrary. EITF 03-1 was scheduled to be effective for reporting periods ending after June 15, 2004. The measurement and recognition provisions relating to debt and equity securities have been delayed until the FASB issues additional guidance. We adopted the disclosure provisions during the period ended June 30, 2004. The adoption of the measurement and recognition provisions will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, result of operations or liquidity.
Variable Interest Entities
37
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51. This interpretation clarifies the application of ARB No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. In December 2003, the FASB revised FASB Interpretation No. 46 (FIN 46R).
Under the provisions of FIN 46R, we are required to consolidate certain cemeteries and trusts. Merchandise and service trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts are variable interest entities because the trusts meet the conditions of paragraphs 5(a) and 5(b)(1) of FIN 46R. That is, as a group, the equity investors (if any) do not have sufficient equity at risk and do not have the direct or indirect ability through voting or similar rights to make decisions about the trusts activities that have a significant effect on the success of the trusts. FIN 46R requires us to consolidate merchandise and service trusts and cemetery perpetual care trusts for which we are the primary beneficiary (i.e., those for which we absorb a majority of the trusts expected losses). We are the primary beneficiary of a trust whenever a majority of the assets of the trust are attributable to deposits of our customers.
Consolidation of Trusts: We implemented FIN 46R as of March 31, 2004, which resulted in the consolidation of our preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts and our cemetery perpetual care trusts. We did not recognize a cumulative effect of an accounting change as a result of the implementation of FIN 46R, as it relates to the consolidation of our trusts. The implementation of FIN 46R affects certain line items on our consolidated balance sheet and statement of operations as described below; however, there will be no impact to net income in the statement of operations as a result of the implementation. Additionally, the implementation of FIN 46R did not result in any net changes to our consolidated statement of cash flows; however, it does require certain financing and investing activities to be disclosed.
Although FIN 46R requires consolidation of most of the merchandise and service and perpetual care trusts, it does not change the legal relationships among the trusts, the Company and our customers. In the case of merchandise and service trusts, the customers are the legal beneficiaries. In the case of cemetery perpetual care trusts, we do not have a legal right to the perpetual care trust assets. For these reasons, upon consolidation of the trusts, we recognize non-controlling interests in its financial statements to reflect third party interests in these trusts in accordance with FASB Statement No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liability and Equity (SFAS 150). We classify deposits to merchandise and service trusts as non-controlling liability interests and classify deposits to cemetery perpetual care trusts as non-controlling equity interests.
We record cash received from customers that has not been deposited in trusts as restricted cash in Deferred charges and other assets in our consolidated balance sheet. At September 30, 2004, these pending deposits totaled $10.8 million. We continue to account for amounts received from customers prior to delivery of merchandise or services that are not required to be deposited in merchandise and service trusts as deferred revenue.
Beginning March 31, 2004, we recognize net realized investment earnings of the merchandise and service trusts and perpetual care trusts, as well as the related trustee investment expenses and taxes, within Other income, net. We then recognize a corresponding expense within Other income, net representing the net realized earnings of those trusts that are attributable to the non-controlling interest holders. The corresponding credit for this expense is reflected in our consolidated balance sheet in Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts for merchandise and service trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts for cemetery perpetual care trusts. The sum of these expenses recorded in Other income, net offset the net realized earnings of such trusts also recognized within Other income, net. Accordingly, net income in the consolidated statement of operations is not affected by consolidation of the trusts in accordance with FIN 46R.
To the extent the earnings of the trusts are distributed prior to the delivery of merchandise and/or services, a corresponding amount of non-controlling interest is reclassified to deferred revenue, until the corresponding revenues are recognized. In the case of merchandise and service trusts, we recognize as revenues, amounts previously attributed to non-controlling interests and deferred revenues upon the performance of services and delivery of merchandise, including earnings accumulated in these trusts. In the case of the cemetery perpetual care trusts, distributable earnings are recognized in cemetery revenues to the extent of qualifying cemetery maintenance costs.
Prior to the implementation of FIN 46R and the consolidation of the trusts, monies received from customers and deposited into merchandise and service trusts until maturity of the preneed contract were recorded as receivables due from trust assets. Upon
38
implementation of FIN 46R, we replaced receivables due from trust assets with the trust assets, at market, to the extent we were required to consolidate the trusts.
An allowance for contract cancellation is provided based on historical experience. An allowance is no longer provided on the monies associated with the preneed contract that are held in trust, currently recorded as trust assets, but previously recorded as receivables due from trust assets. As such, the amount has decreased since the implementation of FIN 46R.
Both the merchandise and services trusts and the cemetery perpetual care trusts hold investments in marketable securities that we classify as available-for-sale under the requirements of SFAS 115. In accordance with SFAS 115, available-for-sale securities of the trusts are recorded at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and initially recorded as a component of Accumulated other comprehensive loss in our consolidated balance sheet. Using the guidance in EITF Topic D-41, Adjustments in Assets and Liabilities for Holding Gains and Losses as Related to the Implementation of FASB Statement No. 115 (Topic D-41), unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities of the trusts attributable to the non-controlling interest holders are not recorded as Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), but are recorded as an adjustment to either Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts. Therefore, unrealized gains and losses attributable to the non-controlling interest holders are reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to either Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts or Non-controlling interest in perpetual care trusts. The gross effect from applying Topic D-41 on our Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is disclosed in note fourteen in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. However, our Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) on the face of the balance sheet is ultimately not affected by consolidation of the trusts.
For additional discussion of our accounting policies after the implementation of FIN 46R, see notes four through seven to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Consolidation of Certain Cemeteries: Additionally, effective as of March 31, 2004, we consolidated certain cemeteries that we manage in accordance with FIN 46R. We recognized an after tax charge of $14.5 million, representing the cumulative effect of an accounting change, as a result of consolidating these cemeteries. The results of operations and cash flows of these cemeteries are included in our consolidated statements of operations and cash flows beginning March 31, 2004. Excluding the cumulative effect of accounting change, the effect of consolidating these entities did not have a significant effect on our reported results of operations.
Insurance Funded Preneed Insurance Contracts
We changed our method of accounting for insurance funded preneed contracts as we have concluded that our insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not assets and liabilities as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 6, Elements in Financial Statements. Therefore, we have removed from our consolidated balance sheet amounts relating to insurance funded preneed funeral contracts previously recorded in Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments and Deferred preneed funeral revenues, which at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003, were $2.2 billion and $3.5 billion, respectively. The removal of these amounts did not have an impact on our consolidated stockholders equity, results of operations or cash flows. See note four to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q and the preneed funeral and cemetery activities in Item 2 of this Form 10-Q for additional information on insurance related preneed funeral contracts.
Pension Plans
Effective January 1, 2004, we changed the accounting for gains and losses on our pension plan assets and liabilities. In 2004, we began recognizing such gains and losses in our consolidated statement of operations during the year in which they occur. Prior to January 1, 2004, we amortized the difference between actual and expected investment returns and actuarial gains and losses over seven years (except to the extent that settlements with employees required earlier recognition). We believe the change is preferable as the new method of accounting better reflects the economic nature of our pension plan and recognizes gains and losses on the pension plan assets and liabilities in the year the gains and losses occur. As a result of this accounting method change, we recorded a charge for the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle of $33.6 million (net of $21.3 million of deferred taxes) as of January 1, 2004. This amount represents accumulated unrecognized net losses related to the pension plan assets and liabilities.
39
Under our new accounting method, our pension expense in future periods may be more volatile as this method accelerates recognition of actual experience. In addition, for our interim financial statements, we record net pension expense or income reflecting estimated returns on plan assets and obligations. We recognize actual gains and losses on plan assets and obligations as actuarial information becomes available upon review of the annual remeasurement.
Our pension costs and liabilities are actuarially determined based on certain assumptions, including expected long-term rates of return on plan assets and the discount rate used to compute future benefit obligations. As our pension plans have been frozen, participants do not earn additional benefits from additional years of service and we do not incur new service costs subsequent to 2000. The key drivers of pension cost are the discount rate used to determine the projected benefit obligation, the related interest cost and the rate of return on plan assets.
Discount Rate It is our policy to use a discount rate comparable to rates of return on high-quality fixed income investments available and expected to be available during the period to maturity of the Companys pension benefits. The discount rate used to determine the present value of the obligation is adjusted annually based on prevailing interest rates as of the measurement date, which is September 30. In 2003, we lowered the discount rate used to determine the pension obligation from 7.00% to 6.25% based on the lower interest rate environment. For the 2004 interim periods prior to September 30, 2004, we used a discount rate of 6.25%. However, following the review of the annual remeasurement, we lowered the discount rate used to determine the pension obligation from 6.25% to 6.00%.
Return on Plan Assets In 2003, we used a 9.0% assumed rate of return on plan assets as a result of a high allocation of equity securities within the plan assets. At December 31, 2003, 74% of the plan assets were equity securities with the remaining 26% of plan assets being represented by fixed income securities. After the $20 million voluntary infusion of funds into the plan in March 2004, we rebalanced the plan assets to have a lower percentage invested in traditional equity securities and fixed income securities and instead incorporate investments in market neutral hedge funds. As of September 30, 2004, approximately 54% of plan assets were invested in core diversified and market neutral hedge funds, 33% of the plan assets were equity securities and the remaining 13% of plan assets were fixed income securities. We believe that this reallocation will reduce the volatility with limited reduction of returns.
Results of Operations Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
In the following discussion of results of operations, certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period financial presentation with no effect on previously reported net income, financial condition or cash flows.
Consolidated revenues in the third quarter of 2004 declined $163.1 million, primarily attributable to the disposition of our French funeral operations, which were joint ventured on March 11, 2004. In the three months ended September 30, 2003, revenues from funeral operations in France were $148.4 million. Consolidated gross profits decreased only $0.7 million despite the loss of profit from France, which was $16.1 million in 2003. Excluding our French operations, gross profit grew due to increased profitability in North America operations.
Revenues from comparable North American businesses declined by $10.5 million or 2.6% due to declines in other funeral revenue and expected decreased revenues from cemetery development projects. Gross profits from comparable North America funeral and cemetery businesses rose 33.2% or $16.7 driven by cost reductions as described below.
Net income was $12.6 million or $.04 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2004 compared to a net loss of $4.7 million or $.02 per diluted share in the third quarter of 2003. Earnings in 2003 benefited from $.03 per diluted share, or $10.0 million, related to our funeral operations in France which were subsequently divested in March 2004. Results in both periods also included items such as litigation expenses, losses on dispositions, other income and discontinued operations as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 (all amounts are after tax):
We recognized expenses of $5.2 million or $.02 per diluted share associated with outstanding litigation matters. | ||||
We recognized a net loss on dispositions of $1.8 million or less than $.01 per diluted share. | ||||
Discontinued operations contributed net earnings of $0.3 million or less than $.01 per diluted share. |
40
Three Months Ended September 30, 2003 (all amounts are after tax):
We recognized expenses of $19.8 million or $.07 per diluted share related to outstanding litigation matters. | ||||
We recognized a net gain on corporate investments in other income of $2.6 million or $.01 per diluted share. | ||||
We recognized a net loss on dispositions of $0.9 million or less than $.01 per diluted share. | ||||
Discontinued operations contributed net earnings of $0.7 million or less than $.01 per diluted share. |
North America Comparable Operating Results Three Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
The following table summarizes the North America comparable operating results for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. Comparable North America operations represented approximately 97% of consolidated revenues and approximately 98% of consolidated gross profits during the third quarter of 2004. Comparable financial information excludes operations that have been divested, acquired or constructed during the period January 1, 2003 to September 30, 2004, and are meant to be reflective of same store results of operations.
Three Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, |
Increase | |||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
(Decrease) |
Percentage |
|||||||||||||
(Restated | ||||||||||||||||
note 17) | ||||||||||||||||
Funeral |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 262.0 | $ | 265.2 | $ | (3.2 | ) | (1.2 | )% | |||||||
Gross Profits |
$ | 44.3 | $ | 38.6 | $ | 5.7 | 14.8 | % | ||||||||
Gross Margin |
16.9 | % | 14.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Funeral Services Performed |
59,292 | 60,966 | (1,674 | ) | (2.7 | )% | ||||||||||
Average Revenue Per Funeral Service |
$ | 4,289 | $ | 4,174 | $ | 115 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||
Cemetery |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 127.7 | $ | 135.0 | $ | (7.3 | ) | (5.4 | )% | |||||||
Gross Profits |
$ | 22.7 | $ | 11.7 | $ | 11.0 | 94.0 | % | ||||||||
Gross Margin |
17.8 | % | 8.7 | % |
In millions, except funeral services performed and average revenue per funeral service.
Funeral
Funeral revenues declined $3.2 million in the quarter predominantly due to a decrease in other funeral service revenues. During the quarter, revenues from Kenyon, our disaster assistance subsidiary, declined $1.8 million. We also experienced a $1.2 million decline in general agency revenues associated with insurance funded prearranged funeral sales due to a shift in the mix of products sold.
Operating funeral revenues were flat as an increase in the average revenue per funeral offset a decline in funeral volume. The number of funeral services performed in the third quarter declined 2.7%. On a year-to-date basis, the number of funeral services performed is down 0.7% compared to the first nine months of 2003 and is consistent with managements guidance for the year.
During the quarter, the average revenue per funeral service grew 2.8%. We continue to see a strong positive trend in the average revenue which is mainly a result of the expanded product and service offerings included in our Dignity Memorial® funeral and
41
cremation plans. The Dignity® plans are focused on adding value for the consumer instead of relying on price increases. These plans offer consumers unique products and services aimed at providing assistance with administrative and legal issues, travel needs, emotional support, and memorialization when a death occurs. Because of these comprehensive value-added offerings, the packages generate significant incremental revenue per funeral service compared to non-Dignity sales.
During the third quarter of 2004, 17.2% of the total funeral consumers served selected a Dignity Memorial® plan compared to 16.9% in the third quarter of 2003. We are continuing to utilize technology and contemporary marketing techniques to enhance our sales opportunities and to strengthen the competitive advantage of our national brand, Dignity Memorial®.
Funeral results in the quarter were impacted by an increase in the rate of cremation. Of the total comparable funeral services performed in the third quarter of 2004, 39.8% were cremation services versus 38.9% in the same period of 2003. In spite of this increased mix of cremation services, we are pleased with our continued ability to consistently deliver meaningful growth in the overall average revenue per funeral service.
Funeral gross profits increased 14.8% or $5.7 million and the gross margin percentage rose to 16.9% compared to 14.6%. This improvement is primarily a result of reductions in overhead and pension costs which were partially offset by declines in other revenue described above.
Cemetery
North America cemetery revenue decreased $7.3 million or 5.4% in the third quarter of 2004. Consistent with guidance given for 2004, revenues associated with cemetery development projects were down $7.3 million. Revenue related to the preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery property is deferred until it is constructed and a minimum of 10% of the sales price is collected from the customer. In 2003, there were unusually high levels of revenues associated with these property development projects as a result of completing projects from a backlog created in 1999 and 2000 when our cash resources were limited. In 2004, we are experiencing more normal levels of revenues related to these completed construction projects.
Atneed revenues grew $4.5 million consisting of increases in the sale of property and merchandise, partially offset by declines in revenues from services performed. Recognized preneed revenues (excluding new development projects) declined $9.2 million as increased revenues from property sales were offset by declines in merchandise deliveries and services performed.
Other cemetery revenues improved by $4.8 million during the quarter led by increases in interest income from installment contracts and increases in cemetery perpetual care trust fund income.
Cemetery gross profits nearly doubled despite a 5.4% decline in revenues. Cemetery gross profits grew $11.0 million and the gross margin percentage climbed to 17.8% compared to 8.7% in the prior period. This significant improvement is a result of reductions in all cemetery cost categories during the quarter, partially offset by the decline in cemetery construction revenues. Of particular note, overhead costs declined 29% due to changes in our management structure and total selling costs were down 28% as a result of changes to the compensation plans.
Overhead Expenses
In addition to corporate general and administrative expenses, there are two other components of overhead costs that are allocated to funeral and cemetery operations in North America: home office overhead and field overhead. These two overhead categories totaled $27.1 million in the third quarter of 2004 compared to $37.8 million in the same period of 2003 representing a decrease of $10.7 million or 28.3%. This decline in costs is a direct result of initiatives undertaken in 2003 to improve the management structure and to reduce our fixed costs.
General and Administrative Expenses
In the third quarter of 2004, general and administrative expenses declined $27.5 million to $25.3 million, predominantly associated with a decrease in litigation expenses and system amortization costs. In the third quarter of 2004, we recognized legal expenses (net of insurance recoveries) of $8.3 million compared to $32.0 million in the third quarter of 2003 related to outstanding litigation matters. Additionally, included in the third quarter of 2003 was $4.6 million of accelerated amortization expense that is not included in 2004. In 2002, we made the decision to implement new information systems and, therefore, accelerated the amortization of the old systems. These accelerated amortization costs ceased at the end of the third quarter of 2003 when amortization of the new systems commenced.
42
Excluding legal expenses and accelerated system amortization costs in both periods, general and administrative expenses increased less than $1 million. During the quarter we experienced increased professional fees of $1.8 million associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance and $1.3 million of increased non-cash long-term compensation expenses; however, these increased expenses were offset primarily by reductions in information technology and other expenses.
Other Income and Expenses
In the third quarter of 2004, we recognized a net pretax loss of $3.3 million associated with dispositions compared to a net pretax loss of $1.5 million in 2003. These net losses are primarily associated with various dispositions in North America. For further information regarding gains and impairment losses on dispositions see footnote fifteen to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Interest expense was $6.9 million lower in the third quarter of 2004 compared to the third quarter of 2003 primarily due to the debt extinguishments in early 2004, including the early retirement of 6% notes due 2005, the repayment of 7.375% notes due 2004 and the conversion and redemption of 6.75% convertible notes due 2008.
Other income declined $6.6 million in the third quarter of 2004 compared to 2003. Contributing to this decline was a decrease of $2.8 million in interest income and a decline of $1.1 million in net foreign currency and other gains. Also, included in 2003 was a $2.6 million net gain from corporate investments.
The effective tax rate in the quarter was 24.9% and was favorably impacted by a $2.4 million benefit resulting from a change in estimated 2003 federal tax liabilities. Due to this benefit and tax benefits realized from certain international dispositions, we expect our effective tax rate for the year will be 11% to 15%.
The diluted weighted average number of shares increased by approximately 40 million shares in the third quarter of 2004 compared to 2003 mainly due to the conversion in June 2004 of our convertible senior notes which resulted in the issuance of approximately 32 million shares. The remaining share increase is related to dilutive outstanding stock options and the Companys contribution of common stock to its 401(k) retirement plan, partially offset by share repurchases.
Results of Operations Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
In the nine months ended September 30, 2004, total consolidated revenues decreased $307.8 million primarily as a result of the joint venture of our funeral operations in France completed on March 11, 2004. Revenues from our businesses in France were $127.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $424.1 million in the same period of 2003, a decrease of $296.8 million.
Consolidated gross profits declined $23.8 million mainly as a result of a $39.0 million decrease in gross profits contributed from France. Gross profits from our French operations were $11.6 million in the first nine months of 2004 versus $50.6 million in the same period of 2003. The loss of profits from businesses in France was partially offset by increased profitability in our North America funeral and cemetery businesses.
Revenues from comparable North America funeral and cemetery businesses improved $3.3 million. Gross profits from comparable North America businesses grew 7.1% or $15.9 million, led by cost reductions.
Net income was $87.5 million or $.27 per diluted share in the first nine months of 2004 compared to $54.7 million or $.18 per diluted share in the first nine months of 2003. Net income in the first nine months of 2004 included $8.1 million or $.02 per diluted share, related to our French business compared to $29.3 million or $.10 per diluted share in the first nine months of 2003. Results in both periods included items such as accounting changes, gains on dispositions, litigation expenses, gains and losses on the early extinguishment of debt and other income and expenses as follows:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 (all amounts are after tax):
| We recorded a charge of $48.1 million (including an income tax benefit of $21.3 million) or $.14 per diluted share for the cumulative effect of accounting changes related to the implementation of FIN 46R and changes in pension accounting. For additional information regarding these accounting changes, see note three to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. |
43
| We recognized a net gain on dispositions of $58.5 million (including tax benefits realized from the dispositions of our French operations and our minority interest in the United Kingdom) or $.18 per diluted share. For further information, see note fifteen to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. | |||
| We recognized expenses of $30.6 million or $.09 per diluted share associated with the proposed settlement of our securities class action lawsuit and other outstanding litigation matters. See note twelve to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. | |||
| We recognized a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $10.5 million or $.03 per diluted share primarily related to the successful tender offer of our notes due 2005 and the redemption of our convertible notes due 2008. | |||
| We recognized other operating income of $4.7 million or $.01 per diluted share as a result of various reconciling activities regarding our trust accounts and preneed backlogs. | |||
| We recognized a foreign currency transactional loss reported in other expense of $2.3 million or $.01 per diluted share associated with the payment of a contingent purchase obligation in Chile. | |||
| We recognized interest income reported in other income of $2.7 million or $.01 per diluted share related to interest income on a note receivable from the United Kingdom company in which we owned a minority interest. | |||
| Discontinued operations reported net income of $35.4 million or $.10 per diluted share. This includes a non-cash benefit of $49.2 million which is expected to reduce cash taxes in future years. |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2003 (all amounts are after tax):
| We incurred expenses of $29.1 million or $.09 per diluted share related to outstanding litigation matters. | |||
| We recognized a net gain associated with dispositions of $3.4 million or $.01 per diluted share. | |||
| We recognized a net gain on corporate investments of $2.6 million or $.01 per diluted share. | |||
| We recognized a gain on the early extinguishment of debt of $1.2 million or less than $.01 per diluted share. | |||
| We recognized other operating expenses of $1.1 million or less than $.01 per diluted share related to the termination of a lease contract. |
| Discontinued operations contributed $2.0 million or less than $.01 per diluted share. |
North America Comparable Operating Results Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
The following table summarizes the North America comparable operating results for the first nine months of 2004 and 2003. Comparable North America operations represented approximately 88% of consolidated revenues and approximately 94% of consolidated gross profits during the first nine months of 2004. Comparable financial information excludes operations that have been divested, acquired or constructed during the period January 1, 2003 to September 30, 2004, and are meant to be reflective of same store results of operations.
Nine months ended | ||||||||||||||||
September 30, |
||||||||||||||||
Increase | ||||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
(Decrease) |
Percentage |
|||||||||||||
(Restated | ||||||||||||||||
note 17) | ||||||||||||||||
Funeral |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 839.7 | $ | 833.0 | $ | 6.7 | 0.8 | % | ||||||||
Gross Profits |
$ | 171.2 | $ | 160.0 | $ | 11.2 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||
Gross Margin |
20.4 | % | 19.2 | % | ||||||||||||
Funeral Services Performed |
191,450 | 192,715 | (1,265 | ) | (0.7 | )% | ||||||||||
Average Revenue Per Funeral Service |
$ | 4,248 | $ | 4,154 | $ | 94 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||
Cemetery |
||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 413.5 | $ | 416.9 | $ | (3.4 | ) | (0.8 | )% | |||||||
Gross Profits |
$ | 67.0 | $ | 62.3 | $ | 4.7 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||
Gross Margin |
16.2 | % | 14.9 | % |
In millions, except funeral services performed and average revenue per funeral service
44
Funeral
Comparable North America funeral revenues rose $6.7 million or 0.8% in the first nine months of 2004 compared to 2003 primarily driven by growth in the average revenue per funeral service. This increase was partially offset by declines in funeral volume, lower levels of general agency revenues, and decreased activity in Kenyon (our disaster assistance subsidiary).
In the first nine months of 2004, the average revenue per funeral service increased by 2.3% compared to the same period in 2003. During the first nine months of 2004, approximately 17.2% of the total funeral consumers served selected a Dignity Memorial® plan compared to 16.6% in the first nine months of 2003. Dignity Memorial® funeral and cremation plans are designed to simplify the customer decision-making process and provide savings and value to consumers through unique products and services which have traditionally not been available through funeral service locations. In addition to improving customer satisfaction levels as measured by independent surveys, these packages also generate significant incremental revenue per funeral service compared to non-Dignity sales due to the comprehensive value-added offerings they provide.
The number of funerals performed decreased by 0.7% and within managements guidance for the full year. Of the total comparable funeral services performed, 40.0% were cremation services in the first nine months of 2004 compared to 39.1% in 2003.
Funeral gross profits grew $11.2 million or 7.0% during the first nine months of 2004. The gross margin percentage improved to 20.4% versus 19.2% in the prior year period. This improvement in gross profits is primarily due to reduced overhead costs and increased revenues. Our targeted gross margin range for the full year of 2004 is 20% to 24%.
Cemetery
North America cemetery revenue decreased $3.4 million or less than 1% in the first nine months of 2004. As guided by management for the full year 2004, we experienced lower levels of revenues associated with new cemetery development projects. In the first nine months of 2004, recognition of revenues from constructed cemetery property declined by $10.8 million. Revenue related to the preneed sale of unconstructed cemetery property is deferred until it is constructed and a minimum of 10% of the sales price is collected from the customer. In 2003, there were unusually high levels of revenues associated with these property development projects as a result of completing projects from a backlog created in 1999 and 2000 when our cash resources were limited. In 2004, we are experiencing more normal levels of revenues related to these completed construction projects.
Atneed revenues grew $19.8 million due to increases in the sale of property and merchandise. Recognized preneed revenues (excluding new development projects) declined $12.7 million as increased revenues from property sales were offset by declines in merchandise deliveries and services performed.
Other cemetery revenues increased slightly during the first nine months of 2004. Declines in cemetery merchandise trust fund income were offset by increases in endowment care trust fund income, management fee income and interest income from installment contracts.
Cemetery gross profits improved $4.7 million or 7.5%. The gross margin percentage grew to 16.2% compared to 14.9% in the prior period and is on the high end of our guidance range for 2004 of 13% to 17%. This improvement in gross profit is primarily a result of reductions in overhead costs, which were partially offset by the decline in construction revenues.
Overhead Expenses
Home office overhead and field overhead, which are allocated to funeral and cemetery operations in North America, totaled $87.3 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared to $114.7 million in the same period of 2003 representing a decrease of $27.4 million or 23.9%. This decline in costs is due to an improved management structure, and reduced expenses associated with various outsourcing programs and new information systems.
General and Administrative Expenses
45
In the first nine months of 2004, general and administrative expenses declined $10.1 million to $100.3 million, primarily due to a decrease in system amortization costs. Included in the first nine months of 2003 was $13.8 million of accelerated amortization expense that is not included in 2004. In 2002, we made the decision to implement new information systems and, therefore, accelerated the amortization of the old systems. These accelerated amortization costs ceased at the end of the third quarter of 2003 when amortization of the new systems commenced.
Litigation related costs are included in general and administrative expenses in both periods. In the first nine months of 2004, we recognized legal expenses of $48.3 million compared to $47.0 million in 2003. Legal expenses in 2004 are primarily related to the $35 million proposed settlement of outstanding securities litigation, net of $30 million funded directly into escrow by our insurance carriers. Legal expenses in 2003 are primarily related to a decision in an arbitration matter and litigation related matters in Florida.
Excluding legal expenses and accelerated system amortization costs in both periods, general and administrative expenses increased $2.4 million. During the first nine months of 2004, we experienced $3.8 million of increased non-cash long-term compensation expenses primarily related to the appreciation of SCIs common stock in 2004 and increased costs of $2.1 million associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance. These increased expenses were offset primarily by reductions in information technology expenses and other professional fees.
Other Operating Income and Expenses
In 2003, we initiated projects to reconcile our consolidated trust assets and corresponding preneed deferred revenues primarily due to the implementation of the preneed component of our new information systems and the adoption of FIN 46R. As a result of these reconciliation projects, we recognized other operating income of $6.9 million in the first nine months of 2004, which represented an estimate of the total impact of these reconciling activities. We expect to finalize the funeral segment reconciliation project and make significant progress with the cemetery reconciliation project by the time we file our 2004 Form 10-K. While the final amount of any resulting adjustment will not be known until these projects are complete, we do not expect any material adjustments to our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows to result from the conclusion of these projects.
Other Income and Expenses
In the first nine months of 2004, we recognized a net pretax gain of $33.0 million predominantly related to gains from the joint venture of our French funeral operations and the sale of our minority interest in the United Kingdom company. These gains were partially offset by net losses associated with the dispositions of funeral and cemetery businesses and excess cemetery property in North America.
Interest expense continued to decline during the period reflecting the success we have had in reducing outstanding debt. Interest expense was $13.3 million lower in the first nine months of 2004 compared to the first nine months of 2003 and will continue to decline due to the extinguishment of the Companys 6.75% convertible subordinated notes due 2008 following the conversion and redemption in June 2004.
Other income declined $3.8 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared to 2003. Included in 2004 was a $2.8 million foreign exchange currency transaction loss related to a contingent payment from the acquisition of our business in Chile. Also, included in 2003 was a $2.6 million net gain from corporate investments. These net declines were offset by an increase of $1.1 million of net foreign currency and other gains and a $0.4 million increase in interest income.
The consolidated effective tax rate in the first nine months of 2004 was a benefit of 4.7% which included non-cash tax benefits realized from the joint venture of our business in France and the sale of our minority interest in the United Kingdom, as well as a $2.4 million tax benefit resulting from a change in estimated 2003 federal tax liabilities. This compares to an effective tax rate of 36.2% in the first nine months of 2003.
Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
46
Our primary financial objectives are to capitalize on our financial flexibility and to continue generating strong operating cash flows. At the beginning of 2004, we had a goal of achieving a credit rating of BB with Standard and Poors (S&P) and Ba2 with Moodys Investors Service (Moodys). In July 2004, we achieved our targeted rating with S&P. In October 2004, Moodys upgraded our rating to Ba3, one level below our target. In addition, Moodys upgraded SCI to its highest Speculative Grade Liquidity rating of SGL-1. We believe these current ratings provide us with adequate access to obtain funds at a reasonable cost, if necessary.
Internally generated cash flows are a significant source of liquidity for us. Based upon our year-to-date performance we believe we will be within our guidance range for operating cash flows (excluding non-recurring items) for the full year 2004 of $270 million to $310 million. As of September 30, 2004, our cash balance exceeded $300 million. We also have a new $200 million credit facility that was executed in August 2004. We have no cash borrowings under this credit facility, but have used it to support $72.5 million of letters of credit as of September 30, 2004. We believe these resources are adequate to meet our near and intermediate term debt obligations, planned capital expenditures and other cash requirements, as well as to have funds available for future growth.
We expect to generate cash flows in the next several years above our operating and financing needs. We currently have less than $140 million in debt maturing during the remainder of 2004 and 2005. We believe that this financial flexibility coupled with our liquidity allows us to consider investments or capital structure related transactions that will enhance shareholder value. We will continue to evaluate internal opportunities such as construction of new funeral homes and development of high-end cemetery inventory. We expect to make acquisitions, if such acquisitions are available at reasonable market prices. Finally, we could consider a dividend or additional debt reductions depending on acceptable market conditions.
On August 16, 2004, we announced a share repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to $100 million to repurchase our common stock. As of October 31, 2004, we had repurchased approximately 9.5 million shares at a total cost of approximately $59.4 million. We plan to continue to make purchases from time to time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions and normal trading restrictions.
During the third quarter of 2004, we made our first strategic acquisition since 1999 for a total cash cost of $1.8 million. We will continue to look for attractive acquisition opportunities to complement our internal growth initiatives; however, we anticipate only modest activity due to elevated price expectations of potential sellers.
We have other potential sources of cash that could be available to us in the future. We are continuing our program to divest of our international operations. In June 2004, management committed to a plan to divest of our businesses in Argentina and Uruguay. We also own funeral businesses in Germany and Singapore and a cemetery business in Chile that we will look to exit when market values and economic conditions are conducive to a sale. In addition, our improved financial condition and credit profile is allowing us to receive cash collateral back related to various commercial commitments. During the third quarter of 2004, we received $39.6 million of collateral back and expect to receive additional amounts during the balance of the year. We expect our cash interest payments to decline predominantly as a result of the conversion and redemption of our convertible senior notes in June 2004, which will reduce annual cash interest payments by approximately $21 million. Lastly, because of our significant net operating loss carryforwards and future tax losses anticipated from proposed international asset sales, we do not expect to be a cash taxpayer until 2007.
Cash Flow
We believe our ability to generate strong operating cash flow is one of our fundamental financial strengths and provides us with substantial flexibility in meeting operating and investing needs. Highlights of cash flow for the first nine months of 2004 compared to the same period of 2003 are as follows:
Operating Activities Cash flows from operating activities declined by $120.4 million. Included in 2004 was a $20.0 million voluntary cash contribution to our pension plan, the payment of $11.4 million to retire life insurance policy loans related to our SERP and Senior
47
SERP retirement program, and a net receipt of $0.7 million related to the resolution of certain litigation matters. Included in 2003 was a tax refund of $94.5 million and disbursements of $25.1 million (net of insurance recoveries) related to the resolution of certain litigation matters. Excluding these items in both periods, cash flows from operating activities declined $20.3 million or 8.7%. A portion of this decline is attributable to our French business which was divested in March 2004. Cash flow from operating activities in France declined $7.8 million from $26.1 million in the first nine months of 2003 to $18.3 million for the period January 1, 2004 through March 11, 2004.
The remaining decline of $12.5 million is primarily due to increased net trust deposits in Florida. In February 2004, we began making net trust deposits in Florida for our new preneed sales and discontinued the use of surety bonding as our primary financial assurance mechanism. Net trust deposits to preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts were $11.9 million for new sales in Florida in 2004. No trust deposits to preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and service trusts were made for new Florida sales in 2003, as we used surety bonding for those sales.
Cash interest payments declined $10.0 million to $72.9 million in the first nine months of 2004 compared to $82.9 million in the same period of 2003. Cash tax payments declined $5.7 million in the first nine months of 2004 to $5.9 million from $11.6 million in 2003. These improvements were offset by working capital declines primarily associated with a decrease in accounts receivable collections and cash outflows associated with Sarbanes-Oxley compliance.
Investing Activities Cash flows from investing activities improved by $174.3 million primarily due to an increase in proceeds of $300.0 million from sales of international businesses and equity investments and reduced capital spending, partially offset by $135.0 million in restricted escrow deposits related to certain litigation matters (described below) and $21.9 million in reduced proceeds from our North America divestiture program.
In March 2004, we completed the joint venture of our funeral operations in France. In addition to maintaining a 25% share of the total equity capital of the newly formed entity, we received net cash proceeds of approximately $287.9 million. Following a successful public offering transaction of our former United Kingdom affiliate during the second quarter of 2004, we liquidated our debt and equity holding in our former United Kingdom affiliate and collected $53.8 million in aggregate of which $49.2 million is reported as an investing activity. During the second quarter of 2003, we sold our remaining equity investment in our operations in Spain and received $26.0 million in proceeds.
In July 2004, we paid $51.8 million to satisfy a contingent purchase obligation associated with the 1998 acquisition of our businesses in Chile. Also in 2004, we paid $6.3 million as a purchase price adjustment related to our March 2004 joint venture of French business, which brings our cash proceeds from this joint venture to an approximate $281.6 million.
In March 2004, we deposited $100 million into a restricted escrow fund related to certain litigation matters in Florida. In May 2004, we deposited $35 million (net of $30 million provided by our insurance carriers) into a restricted escrow fund related to the proposed settlement of our securities class action lawsuit originally filed in 1999.
Restricted cash deposits in 2003 resulted from our decision to replace certain letters of credit with cash collateral for various commercial commitments. Our improved financial condition and credit profile is now allowing us to receive some of this cash collateral back. During the third quarter of 2004, we received $39.6 million of collateral back. During October 2004, we received an additional $15.6 million, reducing our deposits for cash collateral for such commitments to $48.4 million. This compares to $95.3 million at December 31, 2003.
Capital expenditures declined $12.4 million primarily as a result of the joint venture of our operations in France in March 2004. Capital expenditures by our French operations were $2.8 million during 2004 compared to $23.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Capital expenditures in North America increased $8.8 million mainly due to planned additional spending on growth-oriented projects.
Financing Activities Cash used for financing activities improved $64.9 million primarily due to debt restructurings in 2004. In 2004, we have executed a series of transactions to further strengthen our capital structure. In April 2004, we successfully completed a private offering of $250 million principal amount of 6.75% notes due 2016 and received net cash proceeds of approximately $243 million. Including the premium, $219.0 million of the net cash proceeds were applied to the early retirement of $208.7 million in principal of our 6% notes due 2005. Also in April 2004, as required by the terms of the agreement, we repaid the remaining $111.2 million of our 7.375% notes due 2004. Immediately following the June 22, 2004 conversion into common stock of approximately 71% of our outstanding 6.75% bonds due 2008, we exercised our option to redeem the remaining outstanding $91.1 million of the bonds for
48
$94.6 million in cash, including interest and a premium. With these transactions in 2004, we have significantly extended our debt maturity schedule.
On August 16, 2004, we announced a share repurchase program authorizing up to $100 million to repurchase our common stock. From August 16, 2004 through September 2004, we repurchased 5.6 million shares of common stock for $34.8 million. During October 2004, we repurchased an additional 3.9 million shares for $24.6 million.
Debt
Our financial condition continues to improve as demonstrated by the following trend in our cash and debt balances:
(In millions) | September 30, |
December 31, |
||||||||||||||
2004 |
2003 |
2002 |
2001 |
|||||||||||||
Total debt |
$ | 1,294.7 | $ | 1,701.9 | $ | 1,974.4 | $ | 2,522.0 | ||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
318.0 | 239.4 | 200.6 | 29.3 | ||||||||||||
Total debt less cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 976.7 | $ | 1,462.5 | $ | 1,773.8 | $ | 2,492.7 | ||||||||
Total debt less cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2004 was $976.7 million, representing the lowest levels in our company since 1992. Total debt has been reduced by over $1.2 billion or 49% since December 31, 2001. This reduction is a result of strong operating cash flows including the receipt of tax refunds of approximately $152 million and a successful asset divestiture and joint venture program that produced over $800 million of net cash proceeds.
In the first nine months of 2004, we continued to increase our cash balance while simultaneously reducing our total debt. Our cash balance grew by nearly $80 million while our total debt declined by over $400 million. Our cash balance at September 30, 2004 does not reflect a $25 million receivable from our insurance carriers related to the settlement of the litigation matters in Florida (See note twelve to the consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q).
Along with our operating cash flows, we received $287.9 million in net cash proceeds from our joint venture of our France operations in March 2004 and collected $53.8 million during the second quarter from the liquidation of our debt and equity holdings in our former United Kingdom affiliate. The conversion into common stock of our convertible bonds in June 2004 reduced total debt by $221.7 million in principal. Our debt also declined due to a $24 million reduction in capital lease obligations associated with our divested French operations. Partially offsetting these items was $135 million in payments into escrow for the proposed settlement of class action litigation matters.
Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Activities
In addition to selling our products and services to client families at the time of need, we believe an active funeral and cemetery preneed program, which complements our framework for long-term growth, can increase future market share in our service markets. Preneed arrangement is a means through which a customer contractually agrees to the terms of a funeral service, cremation service, and/or cemetery burial interment right, merchandise or cemetery service to be performed or provided in the future (that is, in advance of when needed or preneed).
Preneed Funeral Activities
Since preneed funeral services or merchandise will not be provided until some time in the future, most states and provinces require that all or a portion of the funds collected from customers on preneed funeral contracts be protected for the benefit of the customer pursuant to applicable law. Some or all of the funds may be required to be placed into trust accounts, or a surety bond may be posted in lieu of trusting (collectively trust funded preneed funeral contracts). Alternatively, where allowed, customers may choose to purchase a life insurance or annuity policy from third party insurance companies to fund their preneed funeral (insurance funded preneed funeral contract). Only certain of these customer funding options may be applicable in any given market we serve.
The contract amounts associated with unfulfilled insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not reflected on our consolidated balance sheet. However, when customers enter into a trust funded preneed contract, we record an asset, Preneed funeral receivables and trust investments and a corresponding obligation, Deferred preneed funeral revenues in our consolidated balance sheet for the contract price. The funeral revenues are deferred and will not be recognized in the consolidated statement of operations until the
49
funeral services are performed or the merchandise is delivered. When we receive payments on a trust funded preneed funeral contract from the customer, we deposit the amount required by law into the trust and reclass the corresponding amount from Deferred preneed funeral revenues into Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts. While some customers may pay for their contract in a single payment, most preneed funerals are sold on an installment basis over a period of one to seven years. On these installment contracts, we receive, on average, a down payment at the time of sale of approximately 11%. Historically, the majority of our preneed funeral trust contracts have not included a finance charge.
Trust Funded Preneed Funeral Contracts: Where the applicable law requires that all or a portion of the funds collected from preneed funeral contracts be placed in trust accounts, the funds deposited into trust are invested by the independent trustees in accordance with the investment guidelines established by statute or, where the prudent investor rule is applicable, the guidelines established by our Investment Committee. The trustees utilize professional investment advisors to select and monitor the money managers that make the individual investment decisions in accordance with the guidelines. We retain any funds above the amounts required to be deposited into trust accounts and use them for working capital purposes, generally to offset the selling and administrative costs of the preneed programs. Applicable law governs the timing of the required deposits into the trust accounts, which generally ranges from five to 45 days after receipt of the funds from the customer.
The trust investments are expected to generate earnings sufficient to offset the inflationary costs of providing the preneed funeral services and merchandise in the future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of sale. As a result of the adoption of FIN 46R, the preneed funeral trust assets have been consolidated and are recorded in our consolidated balance sheet at market value in accordance with SFAS 115. Investment earnings on trust assets are generally accumulated in the trust and distributed as each preneed contract is either utilized upon the death of, or cancelled by, the customer. However, in certain states, the trusts are allowed to distribute a portion of the investment earnings to us prior to that date. See the Critical Accounting Policies and Accounting Changes of Item 2 of this Form 10-Q for additional information regarding the implementation of FIN 46R.
Direct selling costs incurred pursuant to the sales of trust funded preneed funeral contracts are deferred and included in Deferred charges and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The deferred selling costs are expensed in proportion to the corresponding trust funded preneed funeral contract revenues when recognized. Other selling costs associated with the sales and marketing of preneed funeral contracts (e.g., lead procurements costs, brochures and marketing materials, advertising and administrative costs) are expensed as incurred. An allowance for cancellation is recorded for trust funded preneed funeral contract deferred selling costs based on historical contract cancellation experience.
If a customer cancels the trust funded preneed funeral contract, applicable law determines the amount of the refund owed to the customer, including in certain situations the amount of the attributed investment earnings. Upon cancellation, we receive the amount of principal deposited to trust and previously undistributed net investment earnings and pay the customer the required refund. We retain any excess funds and recognize the amounts as funeral revenues in our consolidated statement of operations. In certain jurisdictions, we may be obligated to fund any shortfall if the amounts deposited by the customer exceed the funds in trust. As a result, when realized or unrealized losses of a trust result in trust funded preneed funeral contracts being under-funded, we will assess those contracts to determine whether a loss provision should be recorded. We have not been required to recognize any loss amounts at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003.
The cash flow activity over the life of a trust funded preneed funeral contract from the date of sale to its death maturity or cancellation is captured in the line item Net effect of preneed funeral production and maturities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. While the contract is outstanding, cash flow is provided by the amount retained from funds collected from the customer and any distributed investment earnings. This is reduced by the payment of trust funded preneed funeral deferred selling costs. The effect of amortizing trust funded preneed funeral deferred selling costs is reflected in Depreciation and amortization in the consolidated
50
statement of cash flows. At the time of death maturity, we receive the principal and undistributed investment earnings from the trust and any remaining receivable due from the customer. This cash flow at the time of service is generally less than the revenue recognized, thus creating a negative effect on working capital cash flow from operating activities.
In certain situations pursuant to applicable laws, we can post a surety bond as financial assurance for an amount that would otherwise be required to be deposited in trust accounts for trust funded preneed funeral contracts. See the Financial Assurances section within this Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Activities section for further details on our practice of posting such surety bonds. We believe the deferred revenues associated with preneed funeral bonded contracts exceed the expected cost of meeting our obligations to provide funeral services and merchandise for the outstanding preneed funeral bonded contracts, and our future operating cash flows will be sufficient to fulfill these contracts without use of the surety bonds.
If a customer cancels the trust funded preneed funeral contract that has been bonded prior to death maturity, applicable law determines the amount of the refund owed to the customer. Because the funds have not been held in trust, there are no earnings to be refunded to the customer or us. We pay the customer refund out of our operating funds, which reduces working capital cash flow from operating activities.
The cash flow activity over the life of a preneed funeral contract that has been bonded from the date of sale to its death maturity or cancellation is captured in the line item Net effect of preneed funeral production and maturities in the consolidated statement of cash flows. The payments received from our customers for their trust funded preneed funeral contracts that have been bonded are a source of working capital cash flow from operating activities until the contracts mature. This is reduced by the payment of deferred selling costs, the premiums to the surety companies for the bond coverage, and refunds on customer cancellations of contracts. When a trust funded preneed funeral contract that has been bonded matures upon the death of the beneficiary, there is no additional cash flow to us unless the customer owed an outstanding balance, thus creating a negative effect on the cash flow from operating activities.
Insurance Funded Preneed Funeral Contracts: Where permitted, customers arrange their funeral contract by purchasing a life insurance or annuity policy from third party insurance companies, for which we earn a commission for being the general agent for the insurance company. The policy amount of the insurance contract between the customer and the third party insurance company generally equals the amount of the preneed funeral contract. However, we do not reflect the unfulfilled insurance funded preneed funeral contract amounts in our consolidated balance sheet.
The third party insurance company collects funds related to the insurance contract directly from the customer. The life insurance contracts include increasing death benefit provisions, which are expected to offset the inflationary costs of providing the preneed funeral services and merchandise in the future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of the preneed sale. The customer/policy holder assigns the policy benefits to our funeral home to pay for the preneed funeral contract at the time of need. Approximately 67% of our 2004 North America preneed funeral production is insurance funded preneed funeral contracts.
The commission we earn for being the general agent on behalf of the third party insurance companies is based on a percentage per contract sold. These general agency (GA) revenues are recognized as funeral revenues when the insurance purchase transaction between the customer and third party insurance provider is completed. Direct selling costs incurred pursuant to the sale of insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are expensed as incurred.
Additionally, we may receive cash overrides based on achieving certain dollar volume targets of life insurance policies sold as a result of marketing agreements entered into in connection with the sale of our insurance subsidiaries in 2000. These overrides are recorded in Other income, net in the consolidated statement of operations.
If a customer cancels the insurance funded preneed funeral contract prior to death maturity, the insurance company pays the cash surrender value under the insurance policy directly to the customer. If the contract was outstanding for less than one year, the insurance company charges back the GA revenues and overrides we received on the contract. An allowance for these chargebacks is included in the consolidated balance sheet based on our historical chargeback experience.
The cash flow activity over the life of an insurance funded preneed funeral contract from the date of sale to its death maturity or cancellation is captured in the consolidated statement of cash flows as cash flows from operating activities within our funeral segment. While the unfulfilled insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not included in the consolidated balance sheet, they are included
51
in funeral trade accounts receivable and funeral revenues when the funeral service is performed. Proceeds from the life insurance policies are used to satisfy the receivables due. The cash flow activity associated with these contracts generally occurs at the time of sale, where the GA revenues received net of the direct selling costs provide a net source of cash flow, and at death maturity, where the insurance proceeds (including increasing death benefit) less the funds used to provide the funeral goods and services provide a net source of cash flow. If the cancellation occurs within the one year following the date of sale, our cash flow is reduced by the charge-back of GA revenues and overrides.
The table below details the North America results of trust and insurance funded preneed funeral production for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the related deferred selling costs incurred to obtain the trust funded preneed arrangements and the net selling activity associated with insurance funded preneed arrangements included in our consolidated statement of operations. The decline in GA revenue is a result of a shift in product mix from whole life policies to flex insurance policies, for which we earn a lower commission rate. The increase in direct expenses is the result of higher fringe benefits expenses and shifts in the product mix by counselor between trust and insurance. Additionally, the table reflects revenues and previously deferred trust funded preneed funeral contract selling costs recognized in the consolidated statement of operations associated with death maturities of preneed funeral contracts for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.
North America |
||||||||
Funeral |
||||||||
Nine months ended | ||||||||
September 30, |
||||||||
(In millions) | 2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Preneed Production: |
||||||||
Trust (including bonded) |
$ | 91.2 | $ | 97.7 | ||||
Insurance (1) |
187.8 | 167.6 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 279.0 | $ | 265.3 | ||||
Trust funded preneed funeral deferred selling costs |
$ | 11.8 | $ | 10.3 | ||||
Insurance funded preneed funeral selling activity: |
||||||||
GA revenue |
$ | 22.9 | $ | 24.2 | ||||
Direct expenses |
20.1 | 19.2 | ||||||
Net activity |
$ | 2.8 | $ | 5.0 | ||||
Death Maturity: |
||||||||
Previous preneed production included in current period revenues: |
||||||||
Trust |
$ | 89.1 | $ | 119.3 | ||||
Insurance |
129.1 | 134.1 | ||||||
$ | 218.2 | $ | 253.4 | |||||
Amortization/recognition of trust funded preneed funeral
deferred selling costs
in current period |
$ | 7.2 | $ | 6.8 | ||||
(1) Amounts are not included in the consolidated balance sheet.
The following table reflects the North America backlog of trust funded deferred preneed funeral contract revenues (including amounts related to Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts) at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. Additionally, we have reflected the North American backlog of unfulfilled insurance funded contracts (not included in our consolidated balance sheet) and total North American backlog of preneed funeral contract revenues at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. The backlog amounts presented are reduced by an amount that we believe will cancel before maturity. The preneed funeral deferred selling costs associated with trust funded contracts (net of an estimated allowance for cancellation) are included with preneed cemetery deferred selling costs as a component of Deferred charges and other assets.
52
North America |
||||||||
Funeral |
||||||||
(In millions) | 2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Backlog of trust funded deferred preneed funeral revenues (1) |
$ | 1,366.2 | $ | 1,501.6 | ||||
Backlog of insurance funded preneed funeral revenues (2) |
$ | 2,204.2 | $ | 2,018.4 | ||||
Total backlog of preneed funeral revenues (total of (1) and (2)) |
$ | 3,570.4 | $ | 3,520.0 | ||||
Deferred selling costs associated with trust funded deferred preneed
funeral revenues |
$ | 98.5 | $ | 95.4 | ||||
(1) | Includes amounts reflected as Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts in the consolidated balance sheet, net of estimated cancellation reserve. Excludes unrealized gains/losses. | |||
(2) | Insurance funded preneed funeral contracts are not included in the consolidated balance sheet. |
Preneed Cemetery Activities
When purchasing cemetery property interment rights, merchandise, and services on a preneed basis, approximately 30% of our consumers choose to pay the entire amount of the contract at the time of sale. The remaining customers choose to pay for their contracts on an installment basis generally over a period of one to seven years. On these installment contracts, we receive an average down payment at the time of sale of approximately 14%. Historically, the installment contracts have included a finance charge ranging from 3.5% to 15.7% depending on the date sold, the payment period selected, state laws and the payment method (i.e., monthly statement billing or automated bank draft). Unlike trust funded preneed funeral contracts, where the entire purchase price is deferred and the revenue is recognized as one event at the time of death maturity, the revenues associated with a preneed cemetery contract can be recognized as different contract events occur. Preneed sales of cemetery interment rights (cemetery burial property) are recognized when a minimum of 10% of the sales price has been collected and the property has been constructed or is available for interment. With the customers direction, which is generally obtained at the time of sale, we can choose to order, store, and transfer title to the customer of their personalized marker merchandise. Upon the earlier of vendor storage of these items or delivery in our cemetery, we recognize the associated revenues and record the cost of sale. For services, personalized marker merchandise where the customer chooses not to elect vendor storage or early delivery to our cemetery, and non-personalized merchandise (such as vaults), we defer the revenues until the services are performed and the merchandise is delivered.
Because the services or merchandise will not be provided until some time in the future, all or a portion of the proceeds from the sale of preneed cemetery merchandise and services may be required by law to be paid into merchandise and services trusts until the merchandise is delivered or the service is provided. As with trust funded preneed funeral contracts, the funds deposited into trust are invested by the independent trustees in accordance with the investment guidelines established by statute or, where the prudent investor rule is applicable, the guidelines as established by our Investment Committee. The trustees utilize professional investment advisors to select and monitor the money managers that make the investment decisions in accordance with the guidelines. We retain any funds above the amounts required to be deposited into trust accounts and use them for working capital purposes, generally to offset the
53
selling and administrative costs of the preneed programs. Applicable law governs the timing of the required deposits into the trust accounts, which generally ranges from five to 45 days after receipt of the funds from the customer. In certain situations pursuant to applicable laws, we post a surety bond as financial assurance for a certain amount of the preneed cemetery contract in lieu of placing funds into trust accounts. See the Financial Assurances section within this Preneed Funeral and Cemetery Activities section for further details on our practice of posting such surety bonds.
The trust investments are expected to generate earnings sufficient to offset the inflationary costs of providing the preneed cemetery services and merchandise in the future for the prices that were guaranteed at the time of sale. As a result of the adoption of FIN 46R, the preneed cemetery trust investments have been consolidated in our balance sheet and are recorded at market value in accordance with SFAS 115. Investment earnings on trust assets are generally accumulated in the trust and distributed as each preneed contract item is delivered or cancelled. However, in certain states, the trustees are allowed to distribute a portion of the investment earnings to us before the preneed cemetery service or merchandise item is delivered (distributable states). Until delivered or cancelled, any investment earnings are attributed to the individual contract items. Recognition of the net investment earnings is independent of the timing of the receipt of the related cash flows, but generally will be the same in states that are not distributable states.
Direct selling costs incurred pursuant to the sales of preneed cemetery contracts are deferred and included in Deferred charges and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The deferred selling costs are expensed in proportion to the corresponding revenues when recognized. Other selling costs associated with the sales and marketing of preneed cemetery contracts (e.g., lead procurements costs, brochures and marketing materials, advertising and administrative costs) are expensed as incurred. An allowance for cancellation is recorded for cemetery deferred selling costs based on historical contract cancellation experience.
If a preneed cemetery contract is cancelled prior to delivery, applicable law determines the amount of the refund owed to the customer, if any, including the amount of the attributed investment earnings. Upon cancellation, we receive the amount of principal deposited to trust and previously undistributed investment earnings and, where required, issue a refund to the customer. We retain any excess funds and recognize the attributed investment earnings (net of any investment earnings payable to the customer) in our consolidated statement of operations. Based on our historical experience, we have included an allowance for cancellation for preneed cemetery contracts in Preneed cemetery receivables and trust investments and Deferred preneed cemetery revenues in our consolidated balance sheet.
As the preneed cemetery contract merchandise and service items for which we were required to deposit funds to trust are delivered and recognized as revenues, we receive the principal and previously undistributed investment earnings from the trust. There is generally no remaining receivable due from the customer, as our policy is to deliver preneed cemetery merchandise and service items only upon payment of the contract balance in full. This cash flow at delivery is generally less than the revenue recognized, thus creating a negative effect on working capital cash flow from operating activities, especially if we posted a surety bond in lieu of trusting for the preneed cemetery contract merchandise and service items, as there are no funds in trust available for withdrawal.
The cash flow activity from the date of sale of a preneed cemetery contract (origination) to the date of the recognition of the deferred revenue upon its delivery or cancellation (maturity) is reported in the Net effect of cemetery production and deliveries line item in the consolidated statement of cash flows. Net effect of preneed cemetery production and deliveries is affected by cash flows provided by the amount retained from funds collected from the customer and distributed trust earnings, reduced by the use of funds for the payment of deferred selling costs when the preneed cemetery contracts are originated. The amortization of the cemetery deferred selling costs is included in Depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
The table below details the North America results of total cemetery sales production and the amounts that have been deferred for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 and the related deferred selling costs incurred to obtain the contract items. Additionally, the table reflects previously deferred revenues and previously deferred selling costs recognized in the consolidated statements of operations associated with deliveries/services of cemetery contract items for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.
54
North America |
||||||||
Cemetery |
||||||||
Nine months ended | ||||||||
September 30, |
||||||||
(In millions) | 2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Deferral: |
||||||||
Total preneed cemetery production |
$ | 241.4 | $ | 257.0 | ||||
Total atneed cemetery production |
149.3 | 121.3 | ||||||
Total cemetery sales production |
390.7 | 378.3 | ||||||
Less: Preneed property revenue recognized at date of sale (constructed
cemetery
interment rights where down payment was at least 10% of the sales
price) |
(84.4 | ) | (79.8 | ) | ||||
Less: Preneed property revenue accounted for as deposits held (cemetery
interment rights where the down payment was less than 10%) |
(29.8 | ) | (26.3 | ) | ||||
Less: Atneed property, merchandise and service revenue recognized at time of
sale or service |
(101.8 | ) | (101.0 | ) | ||||
Deferred preneed cemetery revenues |
$ | 174.7 | $ | 171.2 | ||||
Deferred selling costs |
$ | 32.6 | $ | 33.6 | ||||
Recognition: |
||||||||
Previously deferred revenue included in current period revenues |
$ | 149.6 | $ | 164.5 | ||||
Amortization/recognition of deferred selling costs in current period |
$ | 23.3 | $ | 28.5 | ||||
The following table reflects the total North America backlog of Deferred cemetery contract revenues (including amounts related to Non-controlling interests in funeral and cemetery trusts) and the related preneed cemetery deferred selling costs included in our consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003. The backlog amount presented is reduced by an amount that we believe will cancel before maturity. The preneed cemetery deferred selling costs (net of an estimated allowance for cancellation) are included with preneed funeral deferred selling costs as a component of Deferred charges and other assets.
North America |
||||||||
Cemetery |
||||||||
(In millions) | 2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Backlog of deferred cemetery revenues (1) |
$ | 1,648.6 | $ | 1,574.2 | ||||
Deferred selling costs |
$ | 216.0 | $ | 204.9 | ||||
(1) | Includes amounts reflected as Non-controlling interest in funeral and cemetery trusts in the consolidated balance sheet, except for unrealized gains or losses. Additionally, upon implementation of FIN 46R as of March 31, 2004, we recorded an increase of $43.5 million to Deferred preneed cemetery revenues in connection with the consolidation of certain cemeteries managed but not owned by us. |
Financial Assurances
55
In support of operations, we have entered into arrangements with certain surety companies whereby such companies agree to issue surety bonds on our behalf as financial assurance and/or as required by existing state and local regulations. The surety bonds are used for various business purposes; however, the majority of the surety bonds issued and outstanding have been used to support our preneed funeral and cemetery sales activities. The underlying obligations these surety bonds assure are recorded on the consolidated balance sheet as Deferred preneed funeral revenues and Deferred preneed cemetery revenues. The breakdown of surety bonds between funeral and cemetery preneed arrangements, as well as surety bonds for other activities are described below. The increase in preneed funeral surety bonds is primarily a result of the annual review performed in Florida during the first quarter of 2004. This review adjusted the bonds to cover the liabilities associated with sales during 2003. We expect this number to decline in subsequent years as merchandise and services related to such bonded contracts are delivered or performed (see further discussion related to Florida bonding below).
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(In millions) | 2004 |
2003 |
||||||
Preneed funeral |
$ | 145.8 | $ | 125.6 | ||||
Preneed cemetery: |
||||||||
Merchandise and services |
178.9 | 179.6 | ||||||
Preconstruction |
10.0 | 18.1 | ||||||
Bonds supporting preneed funeral and cemetery obligations |
334.7 | 323.3 | ||||||
Bonds supporting preneed business permits |
3.7 | 4.8 | ||||||
Other bonds |
5.5 | 4.7 | ||||||
Total surety bonds outstanding |
$ | 343.9 | $ | 332.8 | ||||
When selling preneed funeral and cemetery contracts, we intend to post surety bonds where allowed by applicable law, except as noted below for Florida. We post the surety bonds in lieu of trusting a certain amount of funds received from the customer. The amount of the bond posted is generally determined by the total amount of the preneed contract that would otherwise be required to be trusted, in accordance with applicable state law. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, we had $66.4 million and $70.2 million, respectively, of cash receipts attributable to bonded sales. These amounts do not consider reductions associated with taxes, obtaining costs, or other costs.
Surety bond premiums are paid annually and are automatically renewable until maturity of the underlying preneed contracts, unless we are given prior notice of cancellation. Except for cemetery preconstruction bonds (which are irrevocable), the surety companies generally have the right to cancel the surety bonds at any time with appropriate notice. In the event a surety company was to cancel the surety bond, we are required to obtain replacement surety assurance from another surety company or fund a trust for an amount generally less than the posted bond amount. Management does not expect it will be required to fund material future amounts related to these surety bonds because of lack of surety capacity.
The applicable Florida law that allows posting of surety bonds for preneed contracts expires December 31, 2004; however, it allows for preneed contracts entered into prior to December 31, 2004 to continue to be bonded for the remaining life of those contracts. Of the total cash receipts attributable to bonded sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, approximately $40.7 million and $52.8 million, respectively, were attributable to the state of Florida. On February 1, 2004, we elected to begin trusting as a financial assurance mechanism in Florida, rather than surety bonding, on new Florida sales of preneed funeral and cemetery merchandise and services. Our net trust deposits attributable to these eight months of new Florida sales were $11.9 million. No trust deposits were made for new Florida sales in 2003, as we used surety bonding for those sales.
Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements
The statements in this Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements may be accompanied by words such as believe, estimate, project, expect, anticipate or predict, that convey the uncertainty of future events or outcomes. These statements are based on assumptions that we believe are reasonable; however, many important factors could cause our actual results in the future to differ materially from the forward-looking statements made herein and in any other documents or oral presentations made
56
by us, or on our behalf. Important factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements include, among others, the following:
| Changes in general economic conditions, both domestically and internationally, impacting financial markets (e.g., marketable security values, as well as currency and interest rate fluctuations) that could negatively affect us, particularly, but not limited to, levels of trust fund income, interest expense, pension expense and negative currency translation effects. | |||
| The outcomes of pending lawsuits and proceedings against us involving alleged violations of securities laws and the possibility that insurance coverage is deemed not to apply to these matters or that an insurance carrier is unable to pay any covered amounts to us. | |||
| Our ability to consummate the previously disclosed proposed settlement of our Consolidated Lawsuit (as defined within our Form 10-Q) involving allegations of violations of federal securities laws. | |||
| Our ability to consummate the settlement of lawsuits in Florida as described in the agreement in principle with respect thereto, and the possibility that insurance coverage is deemed not to apply to these matters or that an insurance carrier is unable to pay any covered amounts to us. | |||
| Amounts payable by us with respect to our outstanding legal matters exceeding our established reserves. | |||
| We maintain accruals for tax liabilities which relate to uncertain tax matters. If these tax matters are unfavorably resolved, we will make any required payments to tax authorities. If these tax matters are favorably resolved, the accruals maintained by us will no longer be required and these amounts will be reversed through the tax provision at the time of resolution. | |||
| Our ability to successfully implement our strategic plan related to producing operating improvements, strong cash flows and further deleveraging. | |||
| Our ability to successfully implement our plan to reduce costs and increase cash flows associated with significant changes being made to our organization structure, process and quality of our sales efforts. | |||
| Changes to net income as a result of our ongoing reconciliation processes regarding our trust assets and preneed backlogs. | |||
| Changes in consumer demand and/or pricing for our products and services due to several factors, such as changes in numbers of deaths, cremation rates, competitive pressures and local economic conditions. | |||
| Changes in domestic and international political and/or regulatory environments in which we operate, including potential changes in tax, accounting and trusting policies. | |||
| Changes in credit relationships impacting the availability of credit and the general availability of credit in the marketplace. | |||
| Our ability to successfully complete our ongoing process improvement and system implementation projects, including our replacement of our North America point-of-sale information technology systems. | |||
| Our ability to successfully access surety and insurance markets at a reasonable cost. | |||
| Our ability to successfully exploit our substantial purchasing power with certain of our vendors. | |||
| The outcome of a pending Internal Revenue Service audit and future tax deductions resulting from potential asset sales. | |||
| The effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting, and our ability to certify the effectiveness of the internal controls and to obtain a favorable attestation report of our auditors regarding our assessment of our internal controls. |
For further information on these and other risks and uncertainties, see our Securities and Exchange Commission filings, including our current report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2004, which superseded our 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Copies of this document as well as other SEC filings can be obtained from our website at www.sci-corp.com. We assume no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made herein or any other forward-looking statements made by us, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
For information regarding our exposure to certain market risks, see Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in our current report on Form 8-K filed September 2, 2004, which superseded our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Approximately $315.9 million, or 21%, of our net assets at December 31, 2003, were denominated in Euros related to our French operations. At September 30, 2004, less than 1% of our net assets related to our equity investment in France after consummation of a joint venture transaction. There have been no other material changes to the disclosure on this matter made in such Form 8-K.
57
We occasionally use derivative instruments, primarily in the form of forward exchange contracts, to hedge our net investment in foreign assets and for other hedging activities. We generally do not participate in derivative transactions that are leveraged or considered speculative in nature. During the first quarter 2004, we executed certain forward exchange contracts as hedges of our net foreign investment in our France operations and related to our expected proceeds from the sale of a portion of our equity interest in and the prepayment of a note receivable from a United Kingdom company.
As of September 30, 2004, the above derivative instruments had expired with the sale of France and the receipt of the proceeds from the United Kingdom. We were not a party to any derivative transactions at September 30, 2004.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
In early 2003, we began our efforts to comply with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX 404), which requires detailed review, documentation and testing of our internal controls over financial reporting. This detailed review, documentation and testing includes an assessment of the risks that could adversely affect the timely and accurate preparation of our financial statements and the identification of internal controls that are currently in place to mitigate the risks of untimely or inaccurate preparation of these financial statements. We will be required to include a report on managements assessment of internal controls over financial reporting in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, which must be attested to by our independent auditor. We have not completed our assessment at this time.
In 2004, we have dedicated to date a significant amount of internal resources and time to our SOX 404 compliance efforts. In addition to our dedicated internal resources, we engaged an accounting firm to assist us in the documentation and testing procedures of the SOX 404 compliance project.
As required by SOX 404, we are evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. Our evaluation and documentation of the design effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting is substantially complete. We have initiated the required testing process to evaluate the operating effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. This testing process involves (1) testing our controls for effectiveness and (2) reviewing the documentary evidence that supports the effective operations of the internal controls over financial reporting.
As a result of the testing, we have become aware of the deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are described below. We are actively attempting to remediate these identified deficiencies.
| We have identified deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting related to revenue recognition transactions specifically associated with the timely recording of the delivery and performance of cemetery goods and services sold on a preneed basis. As previously reported, we have improved our internal controls and procedures with respect to these matters since the adoption of SAB 101, effective January 1, 2000, and we have further strengthened these internal controls and procedures in 2004 through Company-wide remediation efforts. Furthermore, during the third quarter of 2004, our new point-of-sale information system used by our cemeteries became operational and contains further internal control and procedure enhancements related to this area. We continue to enhance the effectiveness of these internal controls and procedures. |
| We have identified deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting related to our preneed funeral and cemetery activities. The identification of these deficiencies resulted from on-going projects to reconcile our preneed backlog detailed records, consolidated trust fund assets and corresponding preneed deferred revenues. These projects continue and could result in changes to estimates or adjustments in the preneed items. We expect to finalize the funeral segment reconciliation project and make significant progress with the cemetery segment reconciliation project by the time we file our 2004 Form 10-K. We have also implemented improvements to our internal controls with respect to our preneed funeral and cemetery activities, and we continue to enhance such internal controls. As noted above, we have implemented new point-of-sale information systems that contain enhanced internal controls related to both preneed and atneed activities in our funeral and cemetery locations. |
58
| We have identified deficiencies in the operating effectiveness of our internal controls at the funeral and cemetery field level. As a result, we have initiated Company-wide efforts to formalize and improve the operating effectiveness of our field-level internal controls and remediate these deficiencies. We have implemented formal training to educate our funeral and cemetery personnel on our responsibilities mandated by SOX 404 and have implemented key control checklists covering operational and financial controls that are now completed monthly by our funeral and cemetery locations and reviewed by market support centers. Our three market support centers help facilitate the execution of this remediation effort, including the key control checklists, and serve as liaisons between field and corporate offices for reinforcement and implementation of policies and procedures. |
| We have identified deficiencies in the operating effectiveness of our internal controls at the corporate home office level. These deficiencies relate primarily to controls surrounding reconciliations, approvals, proper authorizations and general computer controls. We have initiated efforts to formalize and improve the operating effectiveness of our internal controls at our corporate home office level and remediate these deficiencies. |
Primarily as a result of our decision to implement new point-of-sale information systems in our funeral and cemetery locations, we have experienced significant delays in completing our review, documentation and testing of our internal controls related to our information technology systems and processes. Active plans using significant internal and external resources are currently underway to complete the required SOX 404 work on a timely basis. Despite this delay, we continue to believe our decision to implement the new point-of-sale information systems is ultimately in the best interest of our shareholders.
While we continue to attempt to remediate the deficiencies identified above, as well as complete our SOX 404 compliance efforts related to our information technology processes, it is possible that we will not complete our testing and retesting efforts by December 31, 2004. It is also possible we could experience further delays in our SOX 404 compliance efforts or identify deficiencies in addition to those discussed above. If we are unable to complete all of our SOX 404 compliance efforts on a timely basis, or if there are deficiencies that have not been remediated, we may be required to conclude in our annual report that our internal controls over financial reporting are not effective as of December 31, 2004. Furthermore, we have not completed our evaluation of the deficiencies identified above at this time; therefore, we have not been able to determine whether the deficiencies described above constitute significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting at this time. If left unremediated, it is possible that the deficiencies described above, or other additional deficiencies identified, could be determined to be significant deficiencies, material weaknesses or aggregate to material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting.
If our independent auditor either disagrees with our assessment or otherwise concludes that our internal controls are not effective, this will be disclosed in the auditors report on internal controls in our annual report. The chairman of our Audit Committee has received communications from our independent auditor stating their concern about our ability to complete our assessment of internal controls over financial reporting on a timely basis.
In addition to communicating to our independent auditors, we have communicated to our Audit Committee the deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting identified to date, as well as our current remediation efforts. Our management, with the oversight of our Audit Committee, is committed to effectively remediating known deficiencies as expeditiously as possible and continuing our extensive efforts to comply with SOX 404 by December 31, 2004.
In a separate evaluation performed under the supervision of our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, we have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of our third quarter of 2004 (the Evaluation Date). We reviewed the status of our SOX 404 compliance evaluation and the deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting described above. Based on such evaluation, we have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting us on a timely basis to material information relating to our Company (including our consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in our periodic filings under the Exchange Act except for the deficiencies identified above.
59
Change in Internal Controls
Except as described in the above paragraphs, there were no other changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2004, that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in note twelve to the unaudited consolidated financial statements in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q, which information is hereby incorporated by reference herein.
Item 2. Changes in Securities, Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On August 16, 2004, the Company announced a share repurchase program authorizing the investment of up to $100 million to repurchase its common stock. Pursuant to the program, the Company has repurchased shares of its common stock as set forth in the table below.
Issuer purchases of equity securities |
||||||||||||||||
(a) |
(b) |
(c) |
(d) |
|||||||||||||
Total number | Maximum number (or | |||||||||||||||
of shares | approximate dollar | |||||||||||||||
Total | (or units) | value) of shares | ||||||||||||||
number of | Average | purchased as part | (or units) that may | |||||||||||||
shares | price paid | of publicly | yet be purchased | |||||||||||||
(or units) | per share | announced plans or | under the plans or | |||||||||||||
Period |
purchased |
(or unit) |
programs |
programs |
||||||||||||
July 1, 2004 July 31, 2004 |
| | | | ||||||||||||
August 1, 2004 August 31, 2004 |
1,048,100 | $ | 6.0060 | 1,048,100 | $ | 93,705,116 | ||||||||||
September 1, 2004 September 30, 2004 |
4,563,400 | $ | 6.2490 | 4,563,400 | $ | 65,188,499 | ||||||||||
5,611,500 | 6.2036 | 5,611,500 | 65,188,499 |
Item 5. Other Information
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
10.1
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors. | |
10.2
|
First Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan. | |
12.1
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. | |
31.1
|
Certification of Robert L. Waltrip as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Jeffrey E. Curtiss as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
60
32.1
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Robert L. Waltrip as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Jeffrey E. Curtiss as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
99.1
|
Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed September 3, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999). | |
99.2
|
Defendants Answer to the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed September 17, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999). | |
99.3
|
Defendants motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed October 8, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999). | |
99.4
|
Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed November 5, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999). | |
99.5
|
Defendants Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed November 24, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.12 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999). |
Undertaking
We hereby undertake, pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b), paragraph (4) (iii), to furnish to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, all constituent instruments defining the rights of holders of our long-term debt not filed herewith for the reason that the total amount of securities authorized under any of such instruments does not exceed 10 percent of our total consolidated assets.
61
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
November 8, 2004 | SERVICE CORPORATION INTERNATIONAL |
|||
By: | /s/ Jeffrey E. Curtiss | |||
Jeffrey E. Curtiss | ||||
Senior Vice President Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) | ||||
62
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit | ||
No. | Description | |
10.1
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement for officers and directors. | |
10.2
|
First Amendment to the SCI 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan. | |
12.1
|
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. | |
31.1
|
Certification of Robert L. Waltrip as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2
|
Certification of Jeffrey E. Curtiss as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.1
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Robert L. Waltrip as Chief Executive Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2
|
Certification of Periodic Financial Reports by Jeffrey E. Curtiss as Principal Financial Officer in satisfaction of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
99.1
|
Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed September 3, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999). | |
99.2
|
Defendants Answer to the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed September 17, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999). | |
99.3
|
Defendants motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed October 8, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999). | |
99.4
|
Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed November 5, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 to Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 1999). | |
99.5
|
Defendants Reply to Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss the Consolidated Class Action Complaint filed November 24, 1999 in Civil Action No. H-99-280, In re Service Corporation International. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.12 to Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999). |
63