UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-Q

OR

Commission File Number 333-57170

Resolution Performance Products LLC

Commission File Number 333-57170-01

RPP Capital Corporation

Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrants were required to file such reports), and (2) have been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes [  ] No [X]

At July 31, 2004, there were 1,000,000 outstanding membership units of Resolution Performance Products LLC and 1,000 outstanding shares of common stock of RPP Capital Corporation.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

Item 1. Financial Statements

RESOLUTION PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

RESOLUTION PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

RESOLUTION PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OWNER’S DEFICIT (Unaudited)

(a) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 includes a $47 million and $39 million net loss for foreign currency translation, respectively. The comprehensive income (loss) for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were ($38) million and ($2) million , respectively, and for the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 were ($17) million and $2 million, respectively.

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

RESOLUTION PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

(in millions of U. S. dollars)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

RESOLUTION PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LLC

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization, Formation and Basis of Presentation

     The consolidated financial statements include the consolidated operations of Resolution Performance Products LLC (“RPP LLC”, or the “Company”), and its wholly owned subsidiaries including RPP Capital Corporation (“RPP CC”). RPP LLC is a wholly owned subsidiary of Resolution Performance Products Inc. (“RPPI”).

     RPP CC is a wholly owned finance subsidiary of RPP LLC that was formed in October 2000 to co-issue the 13-1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes jointly and severally with RPP LLC. RPP CC has nominal assets and no operations.

     The Company is engaged in manufacturing and marketing resins in the U.S. and internationally. Resins include epoxy resins, versatic acids and derivatives. Epoxy resins are chemicals primarily used in the manufacture of coatings, adhesives, printed circuit boards, fiber reinforced plastics and construction materials.

     Products containing epoxy resins serve a wide range of end-users, including automotive, aerospace, electrical, construction and industrial maintenance. Versatic acids and derivatives are specialty products that complement epoxy resins product offerings in the coatings, adhesives and construction industries.

     The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation, have been included. For further information, refer to the Resolution Performance Products LLC Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, including the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained therein. Certain amounts from the prior period have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

2. Inventories of Products

     Product inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market with cost being determined using the first-in, first-out method. Total inventories at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 were comprised of the following (in millions of U. S. dollars):

7

3. Property, Plant and Equipment

     Property, plant and equipment at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 consisted primarily of manufacturing assets as follows (in millions of U. S. dollars):

Property, plant and equipment include capital leased assets with a net book value of $2 million. Substantially all current and future assets are pledged as security under the Company’s credit agreement. Expenditures for property, plant and equipment totaled $10 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004.

4. Intangible Assets

     Intangible assets consisted of the following (in millions of U. S. dollars):

5. Long-term Debt

     Long-term debt at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 consisted of the following (in millions of U. S. dollars):

     For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we paid $37 million in cash interest payments related to our long-term debt.

     During the six months ended June 30, 2004, there were negligible borrowings or payments under the revolving credit agreement. Other debt consists of trade notes payable totaling $1 million that bear interest at rates ranging from 6.75 to 8.18 percent and are unsecured and payable over thirty-six months with one of our vendors for the purchase of computer equipment and related services. Annual payments on the trade notes will average approximately $1 million.

8

     Our high level of debt may preclude us from borrowing any more funds beyond those available under the revolving credit agreement. Based on our current level of operations and anticipated sales growth and cost savings, management believes that our cash flow from operations, together with existing cash and cash equivalents on hand and future borrowings under our revolving credit agreement, if necessary, will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs, expenditures for property, plant and equipment and debt service obligations, although no assurance can be given in this regard. At June 30, 2004, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit agreement and $3 million in oustanding letters of credit. At June 30, 2004, we had additional borrowing capacity under the revolving credit agreement of $72 million.

6. Obligations Under Capital Leases

     Capital leases at June 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 consisted of the following (in millions of U. S. dollars):

The capital leases were recorded at the present value of the minimum lease payments which also approximated the fair market value of the obligation.

7. Pension Plans, Other Post Retirement Benefits

     The funded pension and unfunded other retirement obligations had the following activity (in millions of U. S. dollars):

   Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs

     The following represents components of net periodic benefit costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 (in millions of U. S. dollars):

9

     U. S. Employer Pension Contributions

     The Company previously disclosed in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003 that it expected to contribute $1 million to its pension plan in 2005 related to 2004. As of June 30, 2004, there is no change related to those anticipated pension contributions.

8. Transactions with Related Parties and Certain Other Parties

     During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we have continued our numerous agreements with Royal Dutch/Shell Group of Companies, (“Shell”), including the purchase of feedstock, site services, utilities, materials, facilities and operator type services. There were no material changes regarding our commitments surrounding the agreements with Shell during the period. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we have paid Shell $146 million and Shell has paid the Company $12 million.

     In the ordinary course of business, we dispute charges arising from our numerous agreements with Shell as well as with other third party vendors. As with other third party vendors, resolution of disputes may have a significant impact on our financial results. Currently, the Company is in a dispute regarding phenol pricing under the phenol contract, which dispute has been submitted to arbitration in accordance with the phenol contract. The total amount in dispute is $5.7 million. The Company has partially recognized the amount in dispute in earnings and we have established a reserve for the remainder.

     During the six months ended June 30, 2004, the Company paid Apollo Management IV, L. P. (“Apollo”), $0.375 million under the management agreement, as amended. Under the agreement, Apollo advises the Company concerning such management matters related to proposed financial transactions, acquisitions and other senior management matters related to the business, administration and policies of the Company. The amended agreement requires an annual fee of $0.75 million payable in equal quarterly installments of $0.187 million. During the second quarter of 2004, the Company billed Apollo $0.2 million as reimbursements under the outsourcing services agreement described below and simultaneously deducted $0.187 million related to the quarterly installment due in the third quarter of 2004 resulting in an amount due from Apollo of $0.020 million as of June 30, 2004. The Company also paid approximately $3 million related to certain freight costs to Quality Distribution, Inc., an affiliate of Apollo, for the six months ended June 30, 2004.

     During the second quarter of 2004, we commenced providing outsourcing services to Resolution Specialty Materials LLC (“RSM”), an affiliate of Apollo, under a Management Services Agreement (“MSA”). The agreement was executed on May 27, 2004 and has an initial term of three years with automatic renewal for one-year periods thereafter unless written notice is given by either party. Currently in progress is an information technology project that consists of installing and configuring hardware and software as well as establishing an internal infrastructure. In addition to the information technology project, RPP will provide outsourcing services that include monitoring of services under a transition services agreement, human resources, environmental, health and safety, financial and treasury, information technology, legal, intellectual property sales/service, purchasing, logistics and any negotiated additional services or projects. In exchange for providing the mentioned outsourcing services, RPP will bill RSM monthly and the charges will be composed of the following formula: 33 1/3% of the total salary, bonus, travel reimbursement, benefits and other costs payable by RPP to its Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Director of Human Resources, Chief Information Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Director of Environmental Health and Safety, plus an amount equal to any incremental cost incurred by RPP in connection with the provision of the services multiplied by 1.075 and an amount equal to all out of pocket expenses incurred by RPP in providing the services. In addition, RSM will grant options to purchase common units of RSM to the management, employees or independent contractors of RPP who are involved in the provision or oversight of the services. As of June 30, 2004, RPP has billed $0.2 million relating to the MSA that is being included in other revenues.

9. Segment Information

     Using guidelines set forth in SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, the Company has identified three reportable segments based on geographic and customer information: (i) U. S., (ii) Europe and Africa, and (iii) Asia Pacific and Middle East. Management operates its business through

10

geographic regions and is not organized nor does it prepare discreet financial information by product line within the geographic regions.

Selected financial data by geographic region are presented below (in millions of U. S. dollars):

     Sales revenues are attributed to geographic regions based on the location of the manufacturing facility and/or marketing company and are not based on location of customer. Inter-segment amounts represent sales transactions within and between geographic regions.

10. Income Taxes

     Deferred taxes result from differences between the financial and tax bases for assets and liabilities, and are adjusted for changes in tax rates and tax laws when changes are enacted. Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. At June 30, 2004,

11

we had net operating loss carry forwards for income tax purposes in various tax jurisdictions. We anticipate taxable income in future years will allow us to utilize the net operating loss carry forwards that have not had a valuation allowance placed against them. It was recognized that it is more likely than not that certain net operating loss carry forwards in certain tax jurisdictions will not be realized as a result of current and future taxable income. Accordingly, the valuation allowance has been increased in the current year to reflect lower than anticipated net deferred tax asset realization. The valuation allowance increased by $12 million to offset the increased net operating losses that were generated in the six months ended June 30, 2004. The valuation allowance balance as of June 30, 2004 was $46 million.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

     In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to various laws and regulations and, from time to time, litigation. In the opinion of management, compliance with existing laws and regulations will not materially affect the financial position or results of operations of the Company. Except for the dispute with Shell regarding the U. S. phenol contract referred to in Note 8 above, management is not aware of any material pending actions against the Company.

     As mentioned above, our business is subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations which govern environmental health and safety (“EHS”) related matters. Compliance with these laws and regulations requires substantial continuing financial commitments and planning. Moreover, the laws and regulations directly affect how we operate our business. The financial commitments consist of environmental costs for normal day to day operations, voluntary and mandatory matters as well as remediation issues.

     As of June 30, 2004, the Company has assessed that an environmental remediation liability accrual is not needed based on the current available facts, present laws and regulations, and current technology. For environmental conditions that existed prior to November 2000, the Company’s environmental remediation liability is influenced by agreements associated with the transactions whereby Shell generally will indemnify us for environmental damages associated with environmental conditions that occurred or existed before the closing date of the recapitalization, subject to certain limitations. In addition, management believes that the Company maintains adequate insurance coverage, subject to deductibles, for environmental remediation activities.

     In addition, with regard to the information technology project services being performed on behalf of RSM discussed in Note 8, we have authorized expenditures in the amount of $0.8 million that will be reimbursed by RSM under the MSA.

12. Supplemental Cash Flow Information

     The Company translates its foreign subsidiaries’ financial statements for consolidation in accordance with SFAS 52 (Foreign Currency Translation), using the current rate method. As a result, the statement of cash flows is affected by the non-cash foreign currency translation adjustments that are pervasive in the consolidated balance sheet. The statement of cash flows has been adjusted to exclude the non-cash effects of the foreign currency translation adjustments.

13. Other Revenue

     In 2002 and 2001, the Company entered into BPA technology license agreements wherein the Company granted non-exclusive licenses to third parties to use RPP LLC’s technology to construct, operate and maintain and/or repair one licensed plant for the manufacture of BPA. Other than the grant to use the license, the Company will also provide technical assistance in the design, engineering, procurement, training, commissioning and/or start-up of the licensed plant. Revenues from the sale of the BPA technology license and related support services have

12

been and will be recognized using the percentage of completion method. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, $0.536 and $0.984 million has been recognized as Other Revenues related to the sale of the BPA technology licenses.

     In May 2002, the Company entered into an exclusive and irrevocable option with a third party to execute a long-term supply contract, wherein the Company received $4.2 million. In June 2002, the Company executed a calcium chloride supply agreement with the third party for fifteen years. Revenues from the sale of the option are recognized on a straight line basis over fifteen years consistent with the duration of the supply agreement. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2004, $0.07 million and $0.14 million have been recognized as Other Revenues related to the sale of the option.

14. Deferred Revenue

     Deferred revenue includes the unamortized balances related to the sale of the BPA technology licenses and the sale of the exclusive and irrevocable option to execute a long-term supply contract. As of June 30, 2004, the balance included in Deferred Revenue for the sale of BPA technology licenses and the sale of the option was $1 million and $4 million, respectively.

13

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other items in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contain forward-looking statements and information that are based on management’s beliefs, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management. When used in this document, the words “believe”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “expect”, “intend”, and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable; it can give no assurance that these expectations will prove to have been correct. These statements are subject to certain risks; uncertainties and assumptions, including those discussed under the heading “-Cautionary Statements for Forward Looking Information” and elsewhere in this report. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated. The Company undertakes no obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

     You should read “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in conjunction with the corresponding sections and the Company’s audited consolidated and combined financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

Overview

     As manufacturer and global supplier of epoxy resins, our results of operations have been negatively impacted by external factors such as high energy costs and soft demand. High energy costs such as the increasing price of crude oil and related petrochemical products and the higher cost of natural gas have translated into significant increases in our raw material costs. The slow economic recovery has resulted in continued soft demand for our products and therefore continued overcapacity in the industry. Excess capacity has limited our ability to raise prices on most of our epoxy resin products. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we have seen a strengthening of demand for our products and as a result, we have been successful in raising prices on certain products. We remain cautious of demand slipping and of continued high energy costs. As a result, our gross profit margins continue to be at an unsatisfactory level.

     Our liquidity and capital resources have also been negatively impacted by our sustained reduced margins. To provide relief and financial flexibility under our credit agreement, in 2003 we issued $340 million of senior secured and senior second secured notes, repaid the term loan bank debt, and amended the credit agreement.

     For a detailed discussion of our results of operations, liquidity and capital resources, see the captions below under “-Results of Operations” and "-Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

Critical Accounting Policies

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires us to use our judgment to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain amounts reported in our financial statements. As additional information becomes available, these estimates and assumptions are subject to change and thus impact amounts reported in the future. Critical accounting polices are those accounting policies that involve judgment and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies and the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using differing assumptions. We periodically update our estimates used in the preparation of the financial statements based on our latest assessment of the current and projected business and general economic environment. There have been no significant changes to the Company’s critical accounting policies during the six months ended June 30, 2004.

14

Results of Operations

     The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information derived from the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, expressed as a percentage of revenues.

          The following is a discussion of significant financial statement items related to our consolidated statements of operations. See Note 9 to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for segment information.

  Revenues

     Our revenues are primarily generated through the sale of our three main product lines: (1) epoxy resins, (2) versatic acids and derivatives, and (3) sales of BPA to third parties. In addition, we sell small amounts of ECH to third parties. Revenues have historically been driven by volumes, market prices and foreign currency fluctuations. Revenues also include other income derived primarily from royalty income and commission income.

  Other revenues

     Other revenues consist mainly of the sale of a BPA technology license and related support services.

15

  Purchases and Variable Product Costs

     Purchases and variable product costs are primarily comprised of feedstock costs. Feedstock costs are driven primarily by market conditions and exchange rates as volumes are generally consistent year over year. The significant feedstocks for which we are highly sensitive to market prices are phenol, acetone, propylene and chlorine. We purchase chlorine, a primary raw material for ECH, under long-term supply contracts with third parties which provide us with producer-like economics by allowing us to buy this raw material at a margin above production cost and thereby lower our manufacturing costs. We also purchase propylene, the other primary raw material for ECH, under long-term supply agreements with Shell that are based on market price less negotiated volume discounts. We purchase phenol and acetone, the primary raw materials for BPA, under supply contracts with Shell and other third parties that are based on discounted market prices and input-cost formulae. Because we are co-located with Shell at several of our facilities, our transportation and logistics costs for certain raw materials which Shell provides to us are also reduced. Variable manufacturing costs, which are primarily utilities, are also a significant component of this line item. Purchases and variable costs are reduced by the sale of by-products generated during the manufacturing process, primarily hydrochloric acid.

  Operating Expenses

     Operating expenses represent the costs associated with the non-variable operations of our manufacturing facilities. Included in operating costs are personnel related costs, manufacturing overhead, maintenance, turnaround costs and environmental costs. Depreciation related to manufacturing assets is included within depreciation and amortization.

  Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

     Selling, general and administrative expenses are comprised primarily of costs associated with non-manufacturing, non-research and development operations, including management, accounting, treasury, information technology, marketing and sales, and legal. This includes costs associated with health, safety and environmental activities.

  Depreciation and Amortization

     Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Estimated useful lives for plant and equipment, office buildings, tanks and pipelines are twenty years and range from three to ten years for other assets. Amortization is computed on a straight-line basis for intangibles such as patents.

  Research and Development Expenses

     Research and development expenses are costs associated with product or customer specific initiatives and costs associated with projects that seek improvements in manufacturing processes. Primarily all of our research and development expenses are generated in one of our three research facilities.

  Interest Expense, net

Interest expense, net consists of interest expense with respect to borrowings under our credit agreement and the existing notes, offset by interest income from short-term cash investments. Interest expense also includes amortization of deferred financing costs and amortization of the premium and discount for the related existing notes.

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

     The Company is organized as a limited liability company and is not subject to U. S. income tax. Income tax information presented includes U. S. income taxes attributed to the Company’s operations that are the responsibility of the Company’s sole-owner, RPP Inc.

16

Second Quarter of 2004 and 2003 Compared

     Revenues

          Revenues increased by $41 million, or 21%, to $240 million compared to the prior year quarter. The increase in revenues is a result of increased volume and increased average prices. Overall volumes increased by 14% from the prior year period primarily due to stronger demand. The increase in average prices was primarily attributable to the impact of a weaker dollar on our Euro-related sales and price increases on certain products. Overall average prices increased by 6% from the prior year period, however, excluding the impact of a weaker dollar on our Euro-related sales, overall average prices increased 3%.

     Purchases and Variable Product Costs

          Purchases and variable product costs increased by $30 million, or 21%, to $174 million. This increase was largely driven by higher sales volume and higher prices for feedstocks due to the increasing price of crude oil and related petrochemical products, partially offset by $8 million related to a previously announced cost reduction program instituted at the beginning of 2004.

     Operating Expenses

          Operating expenses increased by $4 million, or 15%, to $30 million. The increase is primarily due to higher maintenance costs, increased turn around activity and foreign currency impact, partially offset by $1 million related to a previously announced cost reduction program instituted at the beginning of 2004.

     Selling, general and administrative

          Selling, general and administrative costs increased by $4 million, or 33%, to $16 million. The increase is due to foreign currency impact and increased costs of additional marketing and sales personnel, partially offset by $1 million related to a previously announced cost reduction program instituted at the beginning of 2004.

     Operating Income

          Operating income increased by $3 million to $4 million in 2004. The increase was primarily due to the increases in revenues, partially offset by increases in purchase and variable product costs and operating expenses.

     Interest expense, net

          Interest expense, net decreased by $4 million, or 17%, to $19 million. The decrease is due to a $6 million write-off of deferred financing costs included in the prior year period, partially offset by higher average outstanding debt balances and higher average interest rates related to the issuance of $200 million of senior second secured notes and refinancing of the credit agreement in the second quarter of 2003.

     Loss before Income Taxes

          Loss before income taxes decreased by $6 million to a $15 million loss in 2004. The decrease is due to the decrease in interest expense, net, and by increased operating income.

     Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

          Income tax expense increased by $7 million in 2004. The increase in expense is primarily related to an increase in the valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets, and by the decreased loss before income taxes. The increase in the valuation allowance results from recognizing that it is more likely than not that certain net operating loss carry forwards in certain tax jurisdictions will not be realized as a result of current and future taxable income. Accordingly, the valuation allowance has been increased in the current quarter to reflect lower than anticipated net deferred tax asset realization. The valuation allowance increased by $5 million to offset the increased net operating

17

losses that were generated in the three months ended June 30, 2004.

     Net Loss

          Net loss increased by $1 million to a $15 million loss in 2004. The increase was due to increased income tax expense, partially offset by decreased loss before income taxes.

     EBITDA

          EBITDA increased by $2 million, or 14%, to $16 million. The increase was primarily due to the increases in revenues, partially offset by increases in purchase and variable product costs and operating expenses. For a reconciliation of EBITDA and Net Loss, see page 19.

First Half of 2004 and 2003 Compared

     Revenues

          Revenues increased by $66 million, or 17%, to $463 million compared to the prior year quarter. The increase in revenues is a result of increased volume and increased average prices. Overall volumes increased by 9% from the prior year period primarily due to stronger demand. The increase in average prices was primarily attributable to the impact of a weaker dollar on our Euro-related sales and due to price increases on certain products. Overall average prices increased by 7% from the prior year period, however, excluding the impact of a weaker dollar on our Euro-related sales, overall average prices increased 2%.

     Purchases and Variable Product Costs

          Purchases and variable product costs increased by $48 million, or 17%, to $330 million. This increase was largely driven by higher sales volume and higher prices for feedstocks due to the increasing price of crude oil and related petrochemical products, partially offset by $11 million related to a previously announced cost reduction program instituted at the beginning of 2004.

     Operating Expenses

          Operating expenses increased by $7 million, or 13%, to $61 million. The increase is primarily due to higher maintenance costs, increased turn around activity and foreign currency impact, partially offset by $2 million related to a previously announced cost reduction program instituted at the beginning of 2004.

     Selling, general and administrative

     Selling, general and administrative costs increased by $3 million, or 12%, to $29 million. The increase is due to foreign currency impact and costs of additional marketing and sales personnel, partially offset by $2 million related to a previously announced cost reduction program instituted at the beginning of 2004.

     Operating Income

          Operating income increased by $6 million to $10 million in 2004. The increase was primarily due to the increases in revenues, partially offset by increases in purchase and variable product costs and operating expenses.

     Interest expense, net

          Interest expense, net was flat at $39 million in 2004. Excluding a $6 million write-off of deferred financing costs included in the prior year period, interest expense, net increased $6 million due to higher average outstanding debt balances and higher average interest rates related to the issuance of $200 million senior second secured notes and refinancing of the credit agreement in the second and fourth quarters of 2003.

18

     Loss before Income Taxes

          Loss before income taxes decreased by $5 million to a $29 million loss in 2004. The decrease is mainly driven by increased operating income.

     Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

          Income tax expense increased by $13 million to a $1 million expense in 2004. The increase in expense is primarily related to an increase in the valuation allowance for our deferred tax assets, and by the decreased loss before income taxes. The increase in the valuation allowance results from recognizing that it is more likely than not that certain net operating loss carry forwards in certain tax jurisdictions will not be realized as a result of current and future taxable income. Accordingly, the valuation allowance has been increased in the six months ended June 30, 2004 to reflect lower than anticipated net deferred tax asset realization. The valuation allowance increased by $12 million to offset the increased net operating losses that were generated in the six months ended June 30, 2004.

     Net Loss

          Net loss increased by $8 million to $30 million in 2004. The increase was due to increased income tax expense, partially offset by decreased loss before income taxes.

     EBITDA

          EBITDA increased by $6 million, or 21%, to $34 million. The increase was primarily due to the increases in revenues, partially offset by increases in purchase and variable product costs and operating expenses.

     EBITDA is presented because it is used by investors to analyze and compare operating performance, which includes a company’s ability to service and/or incur debt. In addition, management focuses on EBITDA because it is used as an internal performance measure. However, EBITDA should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for net income, cash flows or other income or cash flow data prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) or as a measure of a company’s profitability or liquidity. EBITDA is not calculated under GAAP and therefore is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. The following table reconciles the differences between net loss, as determined under GAAP and EBITDA (in millions of U. S. dollars).

19

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     General

     During the six months ended June 30, 2004, our operating cash flow was less than our working capital needs. As a result, our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $24 million from December 31, 2003. Cash and cash equivalents decreased by $6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2003. Our working capital requirements principally include accounts receivable, product and raw materials inventory, labor, equipment and debt service costs. We expect to continue to finance our operations through net cash provided by operating activities, existing cash and cash equivalents on hand, and borrowings under our revolving credit facility and, to the extent needed, sales of assets. As a result of our high level of debt, we will have to continue to generate significant cash flows through operating activities, borrowings and asset sales to meet our current debt service requirements. For a discussion of factors affecting our operating cash flows, see “-Outlook for Remainder of 2004” below.

     Our high level of debt may preclude us from borrowing any more funds beyond those available under the revolving credit agreement. Based on our current level of operations and anticipated growth and cost savings, management believes that our cash flow from operations, together with existing cash and cash equivalents on hand and future borrowings under our revolving credit facility, if necessary, will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs and expenditures, for property, plant and equipment and debt service obligations, although no assurance can be given in this regard.

     Series of Note Issuances

     The $328 million aggregate principal amount of 13½% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2010 were issued in private offerings pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933 in 2000, 2001 and 2002 by RPP LLC and RPP Capital. These notes were subsequently exchanged with a registered identical series of notes with the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2001, 2002 and 2003, respectively. The $328 million of 13½% Senior Subordinated Notes are senior subordinated unsecured obligations ranking junior in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior debt and all liabilities of our subsidiaries that do not guarantee the notes. The proceeds from the issuance of $200 million of the 13½% Senior Subordinated Notes in November 2000 were used to finance in part the recapitalization and related transaction costs and expenses. The net proceeds from the issuance of $75 million of the 13½% Senior Subordinated Notes issued in November 2001 and $53 million of the notes issued in December 2002 were used to repay borrowings under the Credit Agreement (as defined below). Interest on the 13 ½% Senior Subordinated Notes is payable semi-annually in cash on each May 15 and November 15. The 13½% Senior Subordinated Notes mature on November 15, 2010 and may be redeemed in whole at any time or in part from time to time, on and after November 15, 2005, at the specified redemption prices set forth under the related indenture.

     The $200 million aggregate principal amount of 9½% Senior Second Secured Notes Due 2010 were issued in two separate private offerings pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933 in 2003 by RPP LLC and RPP Capital. These notes were treated as an identical series of notes under the indenture and subsequently exchanged with a registered identical series of notes with the Securities and Exchange Commission in 2003. The $200 million of 9 ½% Senior Second Secured Notes are senior secured obligations ranking equal in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior debt and senior in right of payment with all of our existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The $200 million of 9½% Senior Second Secured Notes are secured by a junior lien, subject to permitted liens, on all of our domestic assets (subject to certain exceptions) that secure our obligations under the Credit Agreement (as defined below) and a portion of the capital stock of our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries and direct foreign subsidiaries. Interest is payable semi-annually in cash on April 15 and October 15. The proceeds, net of $7 million of debt issue costs, from the offerings were used to repay borrowings under the Credit Agreement among RPP LLC, RPP Capital, RPPI, Resolution Europe B.V. (the “Borrowers”) and the various lenders party thereto, dated as of November 14, 2000 as amended, the “Credit Agreement” and for general corporate purposes, including working capital. The 9½% Senior Second Secured Notes

20

mature on April 15, 2010 and may be redeemed in whole at any time or in part from time to time, on and after April 15, 2006, at the specified redemption prices set forth under the related indenture.

     The $140 million aggregate principal amount of 8% Senior Secured Notes Due 2009 were issued in a private offering pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933 in 2003 by RPP LLC and RPP Capital. These notes were subsequently exchanged with a registered identical series of notes with the Securities and Exchange Commission in February 2004. The $140 million of 8% Senior Secured Notes are senior secured obligations ranking equal in right of payment to all of our existing and future senior debt and senior in right of payment with all of our existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The 8% Senior Secured Notes are secured by a lien, subject to permitted liens, on all of our domestic assets (subject to certain exceptions) that secure our obligations under the Credit Agreement and a portion of the capital stock of our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries and direct foreign subsidiaries. Our obligations under the 8% Senior Secured Notes and our obligations under the 91/2% Senior Second Secured Notes are secured by liens on the same collateral. By virtue of the lien priority, the 8% Senior Secured Notes are effectively senior to the obligations under the 91/2% Senior Second Secured Notes to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such notes. Interest is payable semi-annually in cash on December 15 and June 15, beginning June 15, 2004. The proceeds, net of $4 million of debt issue costs from the offering of the 8% Senior Secured Notes, were used to repay borrowings under the Credit Agreement and general corporate purposes, including working capital. The 8% Senior Secured Notes mature on December 15, 2009 and may be redeemed in whole at any time or in part from time to time, on and after December 15, 2006, at the specified redemption prices set forth under the related indenture.

     Credit Agreement

     The Credit Agreement currently provides for a six-year $75 million revolving credit facility, the Euro equivalent of which is also available, to be used for, among other things, working capital and general corporate purposes of RPP LLC and Resolution Europe BV (the “Borrowers”), including without limitation, certain permitted acquisitions. The revolving credit facility also includes a sub-limit for letters of credit in an amount not to exceed $50 million. At June 30, 2004, there were no amounts outstanding under the revolving credit facility and $3 million in outstanding letters of credit. At June 30, 2004, we had additional borrowing capacity under the Credit Agreement of $72 million. During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we did not have any borrowings or repayments under the Credit Agreement. As of June 30, 2004, we were in compliance with the borrowing base limit of the Credit Agreement.

     Borrowings that are maintained as loans under the revolving credit facility denominated in dollars, accrue interest at either Citibank’s prime lending rate or the eurodollar rate plus, in each case, a margin ranging from 1.25% to 3.00%, which margin is dependent upon our leverage, as determined on a quarterly basis. Interest rates on loans under the revolving credit facility denominated in euros accrue interest at the euro rate, in each case, a margin ranging from 2.25% to 3.00% depending on our leverage, as determined on a quarterly basis.

     Interest period elections generally range from one to six months, or to the extent available, nine or twelve months for eurodollar and euro rate loans. With respect to eurodollar loans and euro rate loans, interest is payable at the end of each interest period or, for interest periods longer than three months, at least every three months.

     With respect to base rate loans under the Credit Agreement, interest is payable quarterly on the last business day of each fiscal quarter. Calculation of all interest is based on the actual number of days elapsed in a year comprising 360 days. For each drawn letter of credit, we are required to pay a per annum fee equal to the spread over the eurodollar rate for the revolving credit facility, a fronting fee equal to 1/4 of 1% on the aggregate daily stated amount of each letter of credit, plus administrative charges. Additionally, we will pay a commitment fee ranging from 0.375% to 0.500% per annum, depending on our leverage ratio, which commitment fee is payable quarterly on the average unused available portion of the revolving credit facility.

     The loans incurred under the Credit Agreement by RPP LLC and RPP Capital are guaranteed by RPP Inc. and all of our existing and future direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries. The U.S. loans under the Credit Agreement are secured by a perfected security interest in substantially all of our properties and assets and our direct and indirect wholly-owned domestic restricted subsidiaries, now owned or acquired later, including a pledge

21

of all capital stock and notes owned by us and our domestic restricted subsidiaries; provided that no more than 65% of the stock of our foreign subsidiaries is required to be pledged in respect of such loans. In addition, loans incurred under the Credit Agreement by Resolution Europe B.V. (f/k/a Resolution Nederland B.V.), a subsidiary of RPP B.V., are guaranteed by RPP Inc., us and all of our existing and future direct and indirect domestic and material foreign subsidiaries (the “Non-U.S. Guarantors”), subject to exceptions and restrictions. The obligations of Resolution Europe B.V. and the Non-U.S. Guarantors are secured by a perfected security interest in the assets described above and in certain material property and assets owned by Resolution Europe B.V. and the Non-U.S. Guarantors.

     Equipment Leases

     During 2001, we entered into five to seven year leases for equipment at an aggregate annual rental of $0.3 million. The equipment has been capitalized at its fair market value of $1.2 million, which approximated the present value of the minimum lease payments. During 2002, we entered into a number of thirty-six month leases for equipment at an aggregate annual rental of $0.8 million. The equipment has been capitalized at its fair market value of $2.3 million, which approximated the present value of the minimum lease payments. As of June 30, 2004, $1 million of these capital leases was outstanding. We will continue to review entering into capital lease agreements as alternate sources of financing with favorable interest rates as opportunities arise.

     Equipment Notes

     We entered into unsecured trade notes, totaling $3.9 million, payable over thirty-six months with one of our vendors for the purchase of computer equipment and related services. As of June 30, 2004, $1 million of these unsecured trade notes was outstanding. Annual principal payments for other long-term debt will average approximately $1 million for 2004.

     Insurance Notes

     Each year we enter into trade notes with a funding corporation to finance our insurance premiums. Payments on these trade notes were approximately $3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and there was $2 million outstanding as of June 30, 2004 under this trade note. We plan to enter into a similar arrangement for a similar amount to finance our insurance needs in the future.

     Cash Flows

     For the six months ended June 30, 2004, net cash used for operating activities was $13 million, net cash used for investing activities was $10 million and net cash used for financing activities was $1 million. Investing activities primarily consisted of expenditures for property, plant and equipment. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, net cash used for operating activities was $6 million, net cash used in investing activities was $9 million and net cash provided by financing activities was $42 million. Investing activities primarily consisted of expenditures for property, plant and equipment. Net cash provided by financing activities was primarily related to the refinancing activity of our credit facility with the issuance of the $200 million aggregate principal amount of 9½% Senior Second Secured Notes Due 2010.

     Our management uses EBITDA as an internal performance measure rather than a measure of our liquidity. Our cash flow from operations has been significantly different than our EBITDA. For example, for the six months ended June 30, 2004, our EBITDA was $34 million, but our net cash used for operating activities was $13 million and capital expenditures were $10 million.

     Capital Expenditures

     Expenditures for property, plant and equipment totaled $10 million and $9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The $9 million spent in 2003 is made up of $14 million gross amount for operational projects net of $5 million environmental indemnification recovery.

22

     Because we have an established infrastructure in place, our capital expenditures are generally not for the building of new plants but for their maintenance, mandatory environmental projects, occasional incremental expansion or cost reduction/efficiency improvement where justified by the expected return on investment. We expect our capital expenditures for 2004 to be approximately $25 million.

     Outsourcing Services

     During the second quarter of 2004, we commenced providing outsourcing services to Resolution Specialty Materials LLC (“RSM”), an affiliate of Apollo, under a Management Services Agreement (“MSA”). The agreement was executed on May 27, 2004 and has an initial term of three years with automatic renewal for one-year periods thereafter unless written notice is given by either party. Currently in progress is an information technology project that consists of installing and configuring hardware and software as well as establishing an internal infrastructure. In addition to the information technology project, RPP will provide outsourcing services that include monitoring of services under a transition services agreement, human resources, environmental, health and safety, financial and treasury, information technology, legal, intellectual property sales/service, purchasing, logistics and any negotiated additional services or projects. In exchange for providing the mentioned outsourcing services, RPP will bill RSM monthly and the charges will be composed of the following formula: 33 1/3% of the total salary, bonus, travel reimbursement, benefits and other costs payable by RPP to its Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, Director of Human Resources, Chief Information Officer, Chief Administrative Officer and Director of Environmental Health and Safety, plus an amount equal to any incremental cost incurred by RPP in connection with the provision of the services multiplied by 1.075 and an amount equal to all out of pocket expenses incurred by RPP in providing the services. In addition, RSM will grant options to purchase common units of RSM to the management, employees or independent contractors of RPP who are involved in the provision or oversight of the services. As of June 30, 2004, RPP has billed $0.2 million relating to the MSA that is being included in other revenues. It is expected that our other revenues will increase with the related billing of the outsourcing fees and our fixed cost will also increase to support the outsourcing services.

     In addition, with regard to the information technology project services being performed on behalf of RSM discussed in Note 8, we have authorized expenditures in the amount of $0.8 million that will be reimbursed by RSM.

Outlook for Remainder of 2004

     We have begun to experience an improvement in demand from the markets we serve. If the global recovery continues, volumes should continue to rebound. As a result, the supply and demand dynamics for our products will be more sensitive to support price increases in our markets. Raw material prices increased in 2003 and the first half of 2004 due to political instability in the Middle East (including the conflict in Iraq), supply disruptions, recently increased demand for hydrocarbons, and plant turnarounds of various suppliers. There can be no assurances that (a) any sustained global recovery will occur during the remainder of 2004, (b) we will be able to realize margins we have historically achieved as feedstock costs decline, or (c) our feedstock costs will not continue to rise faster than our product selling prices and, therefore, reduce our margins.

     We believe that demand for epoxy resin products will continue to improve in the remainder of 2004 from 2003 levels, as described above. Also, we have recently announced epoxy resin products price increases for third quarter 2004 in all markets we serve. We believe epoxy resin products price increases will be announced and implemented in subsequent quarters to help offset the raw material price increases. During the first half of 2004, the industry generally had been unable to successfully achieve price increases on epoxy resin products, although some price increases were achieved toward the end of the second quarter.

     The new cost reduction program we instituted at the beginning of 2004 focused primarily on variable costs to improve our margins. These cost reductions relate to (i) improvements in the contractual price of certain feedstocks which we have negotiated or expect to be implemented, and (ii) specific projects at each of our plants which will result in higher efficiency in the consumption of raw materials and the lower usage of utilities, thereby reducing the cost of production independent of changes in the markets for our feedstocks or energy. In addition, as part of our cost reduction program, we have taken and will continue to take actions to eliminate certain additional fixed costs. The

23

benefits of the cost reduction program, expected to represent $20 million to $30 million annually, are expected to be realized in 2004. The implementation costs of this program are not expected to be material. For the six months ended June 30, 2004, we have realized $14 million of the expected annual cost reductions for 2004, a portion of which is related to the U. S. phenol contract. See Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements for further discussion of the U. S. phenol contract.

     There can be no assurances that (i) demand for our products will increase during the remainder of 2004, (ii) the announced price increases by us or our competitors will be accepted by our customers or that we will not lose any significant customers or volumes in the future as a result of these price increases, (iii) the cost reductions described above will be achieved or (iv) the expected benefits of the cost reduction program will not be offset by increases in other expenses.

Environmental, Health and Safety

     Our business is subject to various federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations which govern environmental health and safety (“EHS”) related matters. Compliance with these laws and regulations requires substantial continuing financial commitments and planning. Moreover, the laws and regulations directly affect how we operate our business. The financial commitments consist of environmental costs for normal day to day operations, voluntary and mandatory matters as well as remediation issues.

     We accrue for environmental liabilities when the liability is probable and the costs are reasonably estimable. As of June 30, 2004, we have assessed that an environmental remediation liability accrual is not needed based on the current available facts, present laws and regulations, and current technology. This assessment is based on the lack of evidence of any claims or possible claims against us from the closing date of the recapitalization. For environmental conditions that existed prior to the closing date, our environmental remediation liability is influenced by agreements associated with the transactions whereby Shell generally will indemnify us for environmental damages associated with environmental conditions that occurred or existed before the closing date of the recapitalization, subject to certain limitations. In addition, for incidents occurring after the closing date of the recapitalization transaction, management believes that we maintain adequate insurance coverage, subject to deductibles, for environmental remediation activities.

Effects of Currency Fluctuations

     We conduct operations in countries around the world. Therefore, our results of operations are subject to both currency transaction risk and currency translation risk. We incur currency transaction risk whenever we enter into either a purchase or sales transaction using a currency other than the local currency of the transacting entity. With respect to currency translation risk, our financial condition and results of operations are measured and recorded in the relevant domestic currency and then translated into U.S. dollars for inclusion in our unaudited consolidated financial statements. Exchange rates between these currencies and U.S. dollars in recent years have fluctuated significantly and may do so in the future. The majority of our revenues and costs are denominated in U.S. dollars, with Euro-related currencies also being significant. For the six months ended June, 2004, 56% of our total revenues and 55% of our total expenses were from companies incorporated outside the United States. For the six months ended June 30, 2003, 56% of our total revenues and 58% of our total expenses were from companies incorporated outside the United States. A substantial amount of assets and liabilities outside the United States are denominated in the Euro. The average exchange rate of the U. S. dollar to the Euro was approximately 1.227 and 1.119 for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Historically, we have not undertaken hedging strategies to minimize the effect of currency fluctuations. Significant changes in the value of the Euro relative to the U.S. dollar could also have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and our ability to meet interest and principal payments on Euro-denominated debt, including certain borrowings under the Credit Agreement, and U.S. dollar denominated debt, including the notes and certain borrowings under the Credit Agreement.

Cautionary Statements for Forward-Looking Information

          Certain information set forth in this report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of

24

Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues or performance, capital expenditures, financing needs, plans or intentions relating to acquisitions, business trends, and other information that is not historical information in particular, appear under the heading “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. When used in this report, the words “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “forecasts,” “plans,” “intends,” “believes” and variations of such words or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We may also make additional forward-looking statements from time to time. All such subsequent forward-looking statements, whether written or oral, by us or on our behalf, are also expressly qualified by these cautionary statements.

          All forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, management’s examination of historical operating trends, are based upon our current expectations and various assumptions. Our expectations, beliefs and projections are expressed in good faith and we believe there is a reasonable basis for them. However, there can be no assurance that management’s expectations, beliefs and projections will result or be achieved. All forward-looking statements apply only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements, which may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

          There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in or contemplated by this report. Such risks, uncertainties and other important factors include, among others:

	-		general economic and business conditions; including those influenced by international and geopolitical events such as the war with Iraq and any future terrorist attacks;
	-		the continuing decrease in our annual revenues over the past five years and net income over the last three years;
	-		industry trends;
	-		increases in our leverage;
	-		changes in our ownership structure;
	-		restrictions contained in our debt agreements;
	-		the continuity or replacement of systems and services being provided to us by Shell or its affiliates;
	-		changes in business strategy, development plans or cost savings plans;
	-		competition;
	-		changes in distribution channels or competitive conditions in the markets or countries where we operate;
	-		the highly cyclical nature of the end-use markets in which we participate;
	-		the loss of any of our major customers;
	-		raw material costs and availability;
	-		ability to attain and maintain any price increases for our products;
	-		changes in demand for our products;
	-		availability of qualified personnel;

25

	-		foreign currency fluctuations and devaluations and political instability in our foreign markets;
	-		the loss of our intellectual property rights;
	-		availability, terms and deployment of capital;
	-		changes in, or the failure or inability to comply with, government regulation, including environmental regulations; and
	-		increases in the cost of compliance with laws and regulations, including environmental laws and regulations.

          These risks and certain other uncertainties are discussed in more detail in our Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-112106), which was declared effective by the SEC on February 4, 2004. There may be other factors, including those discussed elsewhere in this report that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements should be considered in light of these factors.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

          We are engaged in manufacturing and marketing resins in the U. S. and internationally. As a result, we are exposed to certain market risks that include financial instruments such as foreign currency, short-term investments, trade receivables, and long-term debt. We do not enter into derivative instruments for trading purposes.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

          As of the end of the period covered by this report, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (“Disclosure Controls”). This evaluation (“Controls Evaluation”) was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”).

          Our management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our “internal controls and procedures for financial reporting” (“Internal Controls”) will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

          Based upon the Controls Evaluation, the CEO and CFO have concluded that, to the best of their knowledge and subject to the limitations noted above, the Disclosure Controls are effective at the reasonable assurance level to timely alert management to material information relating to us during the period when our periodic reports are being prepared. There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date we carried out this evaluation. In addition, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

26

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)

Exhibits

	10.1		Management Services Agreement dated May 27, 2004, between Resolution Performance Products LLC. A Delaware Corporation and Resolution Specialty Materials Inc., a Delaware Corporation.
	31.1		CFO Section 302 certification
	31.2		CEO Section 302 certification
	32		CEO and CFO Section 906 certification

(b)

Reports on Form 8-K.

On May 7, 2004, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K to disclose the first quarter 2004 results earnings press release under “Item 7. Financial Statements and Exhibits” and “Item 12. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.

27

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

28