FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
For the Year Ended December 31, 2003
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Incorporated in the State of
Delaware
|
Employer Identification No. 76-0146568 |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share
The above Securities are listed on the New York Stock Exchange.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ü No .
Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K .
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is an accelerated filer. Yes ü No .
The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2003 was $11.1 billion.
The number of shares outstanding of the Companys common stock as of January 30, 2004 is shown below:
Title of Class | Number of Shares Outstanding | |
Common Stock, par value $0.10 per share
|
251,656,714 |
Part of | ||||
Form 10-K | Documents Incorporated By Reference | |||
Part II | Portions of the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2003 Annual Report to Stockholders. | |||
Part III | Portions of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation to be held May 6, 2004 (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to April 29, 2004). |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | |||||||
2 | |||||||
2 | |||||||
2 | |||||||
2 | |||||||
5 | |||||||
7 | |||||||
16 | |||||||
18 | |||||||
21 | |||||||
22 | |||||||
23 | |||||||
24 | |||||||
24 | |||||||
25 | |||||||
25 | |||||||
25 | |||||||
26 | |||||||
26 | |||||||
26 | |||||||
26 | |||||||
26 | |||||||
26 | |||||||
27 | |||||||
29 | |||||||
29 | |||||||
31 | |||||||
31 | |||||||
32 | |||||||
52 | |||||||
53 | |||||||
114 | |||||||
114 | |||||||
114 | |||||||
114 | |||||||
114 | |||||||
114 | |||||||
Item 14.
|
114 | ||||||
115 |
1
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation is among the largest independent oil and gas exploration and production companies in the world, with 2.5 billion barrels of oil equivalent (BOE) of proved reserves as of December 31, 2003. The Companys major areas of operations are located in the United States, primarily in Texas, Louisiana, the mid-continent region and the western states, Alaska and in the shallow and deep waters of the Gulf of Mexico, as well as in Canada and Algeria. Anadarko also has significant production in Venezuela and Qatar and is executing strategic exploration programs in several other countries. The Company actively markets natural gas, oil and natural gas liquids (NGLs) and owns and operates gas gathering systems in its core producing areas. In addition, the Company engages in the hard minerals business through non-operated joint ventures and royalty arrangements in several coal, trona (natural soda ash) and industrial mineral mines located on lands within and adjacent to its Land Grant holdings. The Land Grant is an 8 million acre strip running through portions of Colorado, Wyoming and Utah where the Company owns most of its fee mineral rights. Anadarko is committed to minimizing the environmental impact of exploration and production activities in its worldwide operations through programs such as carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration and the reduction of surface area used for production facilities.
Available Information The Company files Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, registration statements and other items with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Anadarko provides access free of charge to all of these SEC filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after filing, on its internet site located at www.anadarko.com. The Company will also make available to any stockholder, without charge, copies of its Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC. For copies of this, or any other filings, please contact: Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, Public Affairs Department, P.O. Box 1330, Houston, Texas 77251-1330 or call (832) 636-1316.
Oil and Gas Properties and Activities
Proved Reserves and Future Net Cash Flows
As of December 31, 2003, Anadarko had proved reserves of 7.7 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) of natural gas and 1.2 billion barrels of crude oil, condensate and NGLs. Combined, these proved reserves are equivalent to 2.5 billion barrels of oil or 15.1 Tcf of gas. The Companys reserves have grown 22% over the past three years due primarily to: the acquisitions of Berkley Petroleum Corp. (Berkley) and Gulfstream Resources Canada Limited in 2001 and Howell Corporation (Howell) in 2002; substantial crude oil and natural gas reserves discovered in the Gulf of Mexico, Canada and onshore in the United States; crude oil reserves added in Algeria and Alaska; and, through acquisitions of producing properties. As of December 31, 2003, Anadarko had proved developed reserves of 5.9 Tcf of natural gas and 746 million barrels (MMBbls) of crude oil, condensate and NGLs. Proved developed reserves comprise 69% of total proved reserves.
2
Worldwide Proved Undeveloped Reserves Analysis
Percentage | ||||||||||||
PUDs | Percentage | of Total Proved | ||||||||||
MMBOE | of Total PUDs | Reserves | ||||||||||
Country | ||||||||||||
United States
|
466 | 59% | 18% | |||||||||
Algeria
|
179 | 23% | 7% | |||||||||
Canada
|
72 | 9% | 3% | |||||||||
Other International
|
69 | 9% | 3% | |||||||||
Total
|
786 | 100% | 31% | |||||||||
3
The following graph shows the change in PUDs for each year by comparing the vintage distribution of December 31, 2003 PUDs to the vintage distribution of December 31, 2002 PUDs. It illustrates the Companys effectiveness in converting PUDs to developed reserves.
The Companys estimates of proved reserves, proved developed reserves and proved undeveloped reserves at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 and changes in proved reserves during the last three years are contained in the Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Activities Unaudited (Supplemental Information) in the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2003 Consolidated Financial Statements (Consolidated Financial Statements) under Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Company files annual estimates of certain proved oil and gas reserves with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), which are within 5% of the amounts included in the above estimates. See Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates under Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
4
Sales Volumes and Prices
The following table shows the Companys annual sales volumes. Volumes for natural gas are in billion cubic feet (Bcf) at a pressure base of 14.73 pounds per square inch and volumes for oil, condensate and NGLs are in MMBbls. Total volumes are in MMBOE. For this computation, six thousand cubic feet (Mcf) of gas is the energy equivalent of one barrel of oil, condensate or NGLs.
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
United States
|
|||||||||||||
Natural gas (Bcf)
|
503 | 507 | 573 | ||||||||||
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
|
34 | 31 | 34 | ||||||||||
Natural gas liquids (MMBbls)
|
16 | 14 | 14 | ||||||||||
Total (MMBOE)
|
135 | 130 | 144 | ||||||||||
Canada
|
|||||||||||||
Natural gas (Bcf)
|
140 | 135 | 121 | ||||||||||
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
|
6 | 12 | 13 | ||||||||||
Natural gas liquids (MMBbls)
|
1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||
Total (MMBOE)
|
30 | 35 | 34 | ||||||||||
Algeria
|
|||||||||||||
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
|
19 | 24 | 8 | ||||||||||
Total (MMBOE)
|
19 | 24 | 8 | ||||||||||
Other International
|
|||||||||||||
Natural gas (Bcf)
|
| | 1 | ||||||||||
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
|
8 | 8 | 13 | ||||||||||
Total (MMBOE)
|
8 | 8 | 13 | ||||||||||
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Natural gas (Bcf)
|
643 | 642 | 695 | ||||||||||
Oil and condensate (MMBbls)
|
67 | 75 | 68 | ||||||||||
Natural gas liquids (MMBbls)
|
17 | 15 | 15 | ||||||||||
Total (MMBOE)
|
192 | 197 | 199 |
5
The following table shows the Companys annual average sales prices and average production costs. The average sales prices include gains and losses for derivative contracts the Company utilizes to manage price risk related to the Companys sales volumes. Production costs are costs incurred to operate and maintain the Companys wells and related equipment and include cost of labor, well service and repair, location maintenance, power and fuel, transportation, cost of product, property taxes, production and severance taxes and production related administrative and general costs. Certain amounts for prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Additional information on volumes, prices and markets is contained in Financial Results and Marketing Strategies under Item 7 of this Form 10-K. Additional detail of production costs is contained in the Supplemental Information under Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Information on major customers is contained in Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||
United States
|
||||||||||||||
Sales price
|
||||||||||||||
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
$ | 4.36 | $ | 2.83 | $ | 4.23 | ||||||||
Oil and condensate (per barrel)
|
26.16 | 22.90 | 23.08 | |||||||||||
Natural gas liquids (per barrel)
|
21.19 | 14.98 | 16.44 | |||||||||||
Production cost (per BOE)
|
$ | 5.49 | $ | 4.66 | $ | 4.66 | ||||||||
Canada
|
||||||||||||||
Sales price
|
||||||||||||||
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
$ | 4.71 | $ | 2.91 | $ | 4.38 | ||||||||
Oil and condensate (per barrel)
|
27.33 | 19.09 | 18.18 | |||||||||||
Natural gas liquids (per barrel)
|
21.04 | 12.11 | 18.32 | |||||||||||
Production cost (per BOE)
|
$ | 8.01 | $ | 6.40 | $ | 5.97 | ||||||||
Algeria
|
||||||||||||||
Sales price
|
||||||||||||||
Oil and condensate (per barrel)
|
$ | 28.43 | $ | 24.38 | $ | 23.97 | ||||||||
Production cost (per BOE)
|
$ | 2.44 | $ | 1.78 | $ | 2.33 | ||||||||
Other International
|
||||||||||||||
Sales price
|
||||||||||||||
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 1.22 | ||||||||
Oil and condensate (per barrel)
|
23.15 | 19.92 | 14.35 | |||||||||||
Production cost (per BOE)
|
$ | 8.90 | $ | 8.48 | $ | 5.71 | ||||||||
Total
|
||||||||||||||
Sales price
|
||||||||||||||
Natural gas (per Mcf)
|
$ | 4.43 | $ | 2.85 | $ | 4.25 | ||||||||
Oil and condensate (per barrel)
|
26.55 | 22.44 | 20.56 | |||||||||||
Natural gas liquids (per barrel)
|
21.18 | 14.80 | 16.55 | |||||||||||
Production cost (per BOE)
|
$ | 5.71 | $ | 4.79 | $ | 4.85 |
6
Properties and Activities United States
Anadarkos active areas in the United States include the Lower 48 states, Alaska and the Gulf of Mexico. Reserves in the United States comprised 68% of Anadarkos total proved reserves at year-end 2003. During 2003, drilling results included 430 gas wells, 219 oil wells and 37 dry holes. The accompanying maps illustrate by state Anadarkos undeveloped and developed lease and fee acreage, number of net producing wells and other data relevant to its domestic onshore and offshore oil and gas operations.
Onshore Lower 48 States
Overview About 56% of the Companys proved reserves are located onshore in the Lower 48 states, with operations primarily in Texas, Louisiana, the mid-continent region and western states. In 2003, average production from the Companys properties in this area was 1,169 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/d) of gas and 102 thousand barrels per day (MBbls/d) of crude oil, condensate and NGLs, or 57% of the Companys total production volumes. Anadarko has 2,570,000 gross (1,921,000 net) undeveloped lease acres, 2,964,000 gross (1,980,000 net) developed lease acres and 9,527,000 gross (8,478,000 net) fee acres in the Lower 48 states. In 2004, capital spending in the Lower 48 states is expected to range from $1.2 billion to $1.4 billion.
East Texas and Louisiana
Carthage Anadarko is conducting a successful development program in the Carthage area of east Texas. The Company drilled 44 wells in the area with a success rate of 100% during 2003 and had four rigs performing infill drilling at the end of the year. The Company also had four rigs performing workovers and recompletions throughout the Carthage area at the end of 2003. Anadarkos net production from the Carthage area averaged 110 MMcf/d of gas and 3 MBbls/d of liquids during 2003. The Company plans to drill 56 wells in the Carthage area in 2004.
Woodbine The Company is operating a deep gas exploration program in the Woodbine play of east Texas (100% working interest (WI)). In 2003, Anadarko drilled two exploration wells. One well encountered mechanical problems and was temporarily abandoned pending further evaluation. The second well is expected to be tested in the first quarter of 2004. In addition, the Company is participating in a 197 square mile 3-D seismic survey in the area. During 2004, the Company plans to continue activity within the play, which may include offset drilling, acquiring additional 3-D seismic and leasing.
South Louisiana During 2003, net volumes from south Louisiana were 5 MMBOE. The majority of the Companys production in south Louisiana is from the Kent Bayou field. In 2004, the Company expects production to decrease to less than 1 MMBOE due to higher water production.
7
Central Texas and Gulf Coast
Giddings The Company continued its cost-efficient horizontal reentry program in the Giddings field. The cost to reenter a well is about 40% less than the cost of a new well. During 2003, 28 wells were reentered and completed. Additionally, Anadarko continued its water-fracturing program, successfully stimulating 105 wells in 2003.
Brookeland Anadarkos development program included the drilling and completion of nine wells in 2003 in the Brookeland field, where the Company has approximately 178,000 net acres. During 2003, Anadarko successfully applied a reentry program, similar to the Giddings field, to the area with five wells reentered and completed. During 2004, the Company plans to continue the reentry program to access infill drilling areas.
James Lime In late 2003, Anadarko drilled one successful exploratory well in the James Lime formation, in Madison County, Texas. During 2004, Anadarko plans to evaluate the 2003 discovery well, possibly drill two prospects and continue leasing activity.
Permian Basin
Mid-Continent
Central Oklahoma During 2003, net production from central Oklahoma was 22 MMcf/d of gas and 8 MBbls/d of crude oil and NGLs. The majority of Anadarkos focus in 2003 was developing an oil play in the Rush Creek field. In 2003, Anadarko drilled and completed 37 wells in the field, with an 84% success rate, resulting in a net production increase of 2 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day (MBOE/d). The Company plans to drill about 33 wells in central Oklahoma focused on developing the deeper gas producing zones of the Golden Trend interval in 2004.
8
9
Western States
Conventional During 2003, Anadarkos net production from its conventional properties, located primarily in Wyoming, averaged 219 MMcf/d of gas, 4 MBbls/d of oil and 16 MBbls/d of NGLs. In the Green River basin of Wyoming, Anadarko focused on conventional drilling projects in the Wamsutter, Brady and Moxa Arch areas. In 2003, the Company drilled or participated in 114 wells in the Green River basin, with an overall success rate of 99%. Of these, 30 are Company-operated development wells (95% average WI) and 84 are non-operated wells (21% average WI). In 2004, the Company plans to drill 115 additional wells in the area.
Enhanced Oil Recovery In late 2002, Anadarko acquired 64 MMBOE of proved reserves, primarily in the Salt Creek and Elk Basin fields of Wyoming, with the Howell acquisition. In a separate transaction, Anadarko acquired the rights to purchase significant quantities of CO2 and the exclusive rights to market the CO2 in the Powder River basin. During 2003, the Company completed a pilot CO2 flood project that confirmed the viability of the enhanced oil recovery process and commenced construction of the first phase of the project. The Company also constructed a 125-mile pipeline that will transport CO2 to the Salt Creek field and potentially could serve other enhanced oil recovery projects in Wyoming as well. The Company expects to invest an additional $150 million over the next three years for the further development of this project. These projects are expected to result in an increase in net production from the Salt Creek field (98% WI) from year-end 2003 net oil production of 4 MBOE/d to peak production of about 30 MBOE/d by 2009.
10
Coalbed Methane CBM has become a core gas play for Anadarko. The Company now operates three full-scale CBM properties (County Line, Helper and Drunkards Wash), as well as active pilot programs. The Company also continues to evaluate new CBM exploration opportunities on the Land Grant. Production from the Companys CBM properties continued to increase during 2003. At year-end 2003, net production averaged 66 MMcf/d of gas compared to 61 MMcf/d of gas in 2002 and 34 MMcf/d of gas in 2001. In 2003, the Company drilled or participated in 68 wells, with an overall success rate of 97%. In 2004, the Company plans to continue to explore for and develop CBM reserves and drill about 130 wells.
11
Alaska
Overview Anadarkos activity in Alaska is concentrated primarily on the North Slope. The Company had interests in 3,176,000 gross (1,659,000 net) undeveloped lease acres, 24,000 gross (5,000 net) developed lease acres and 16,000 gross (8,000 net) fee acres in Alaska at year-end 2003. About 3% of the Companys proved reserves at year-end 2003 were in Alaska. The Company has budgeted about $60 million in capital spending in Alaska for 2004, which includes drilling three to four exploration wells and about 12 development wells.
North Slope
Exploration During the 2002-2003 winter exploration season, the Company participated in the drilling of two exploration wells, one located in the National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska (NPR-A) and one in the Colville River Unit. The results of these wells are held confidential pending upcoming lease sales. During 2003, the Company participated in the acquisition of proprietary 3-D seismic around the Alpine field to evaluate additional potential satellite opportunities. The Company also acquired 2-D seismic in the Foothills.
Gulf of Mexico
Overview At year-end 2003, about 9% of the Companys proved reserves were located offshore in the Gulf of Mexico. Net production volumes in 2003 from these properties averaged 209 MMcf/d of gas and 19 MBbls/d of oil, condensate and NGLs. At year-end 2003, Anadarko owned an average 69% interest in 417 blocks representing 620,000 gross (325,000 net) acres in developed properties and 1,462,000 gross (1,118,000 net) acres in undeveloped properties in the Gulf of Mexico. Anadarko also holds options to earn working interests covering an additional 112 blocks. During 2003, Anadarko drilled 19 wells in the Gulf of Mexico, which resulted in seven gas wells, six oil wells and six dry holes. In the Gulf of Mexico, Anadarko has budgeted about $600 million for capital spending in 2004, which includes drilling about 30 wells.
12
13
Continental Shelf
Conventional Shallow water projects in the Gulf of Mexico continue as the Company exploits the potential around several of its larger and more mature fields. During 2003, nine successful wells were drilled with an 82% success rate. Anadarko has interests in a total of 142 blocks on the shelf.
Subsalt During 2003, Anadarko continued to delineate the Tarantula (100% WI) subsalt discovery made during 2001, which is located on South Timbalier 308. During 2003, one successful well was drilled and the Company authorized construction of a production platform with a capacity of 100 MMcf/d of gas and 30 MBbls/d of oil. Production is expected to commence in early 2005.
Deepwater
14
The Company also announced a discovery during 2003 on Green Canyon Block 518. The Green Canyon 518 No. 1 well (100% WI) encountered a total of 128 feet of net oil pay in the same pay zone present at the K2 discovery. The Company believes the well extends the boundaries of the K2 field northward. The field is currently planned as a subsea tieback to the Marco Polo platform and first production is expected in 2005. The Company is currently drilling another well on Green Canyon Block 518 to further delineate the field.
Eastern Gulf of Mexico During 2003, in the eastern Gulf of Mexico, Anadarko made a natural gas discovery at its Jubilee prospect, the first well in Anadarkos eastern Gulf exploration program. The Atwater Valley 349 No. 1 well encountered 83 feet of net pay. Anadarko made a second natural gas discovery at the deepwater Atlas prospect on Lloyd Ridge Block 50. Anadarko holds a 100% WI in Atlas and Jubilee. The Company made a third eastern Gulf of Mexico discovery on its Spiderman prospect (45% WI). The discovery well encountered more than 140 feet of net pay. The well is located on DeSoto Canyon Block 621, about 180 miles southeast of New Orleans. In early 2004, a fourth natural gas discovery was made with the Atlas NW exploration prospect on Lloyd Ridge Block 5 (100% WI). Delineation of these discoveries continues.
South Auger Participation Agreement Anadarko has a Participation Agreement with BP to explore 95 deepwater blocks in the Garden Banks and Keathley Canyon areas of the western Gulf of Mexico. The 95 blocks, held 100% by BP, are within a larger 640-block area of mutual interest where the two companies have licensed and are reprocessing 3-D seismic data. These blocks are in water depths ranging from 3,000 to 6,000 feet. The agreement gives Anadarko the option to earn a 33% to 66% WI in the blocks. Anadarko will fund 100% of the licensing and reprocessing costs and pay a disproportionately larger share of the first four wells drilled. Anadarko plans to begin drilling the first exploration well by early 2005.
Jupiter Agreement During 2003, Anadarko finalized a Participation Agreement with ExxonMobil covering 32 jointly owned blocks in the Alaminos Canyon and Garden Banks areas. Initial plans include drilling an exploration well in early 2005.
Anadarko holds a total of 152 lease blocks in its deepwater program and has identified approximately 25 prospects. An additional 110 blocks could be earned within its option program. The Company plans to drill about five deepwater exploratory wells in 2004.
Gas Processing
The Company processes gas at various third-party plants under agreements generally structured to provide for the extraction and sale of NGLs in efficient plants with flexible commitments. The Company has agreements with five plants in the western states area, 15 plants in the mid-continent area and 11 plants in the gulf coast area. Anadarko also processes gas and has interests in three Company-operated plants and three non-operated plants in the western states. Anadarkos strategy to aggregate gas through Company-owned and third-party gathering systems allows Anadarko to secure processing arrangements in each of the regions where the Company has significant production.
15
Properties and Activities Canada
Overview Anadarko has operations in Alberta, British Columbia, Saskatchewan and in the Northwest Territories. The Company has proved reserves in Canada of 314 MMBOE, which is about 12% of the Companys total proved reserves. In 2003, net production from the Companys properties in Canada averaged 383 MMcf/d of gas and 19 MBbls/d of crude oil, condensate and NGLs, or 16% of the Companys total production volumes. During 2003, Anadarko participated in a total of 344 wells with a 95% success rate, including 276 gas wells, 51 oil wells and 17 dry holes. Anadarko has 9,124,000 gross (3,310,000 net) undeveloped lease acres, 1,834,000 gross (1,037,000 net) developed lease acres and 606,000 gross (606,000 net) fee acres in Canada. The Companys 2004 capital budget for Canada ranges from $375 million to $425 million and the Company expects to drill about 175 development and 40 exploration wells. The accompanying map illustrates the Companys developed and undeveloped lease and fee acreage, number of productive wells and other data relevant to its properties in Canada.
Alberta During 2003, the Company announced a significant natural gas discovery well in the Saddle Hills area of Alberta. The discovery well (100% WI) flowed at a rate of 16 MMcf/d of gas. A total of seven gas wells were completed in the area during 2003.
British Columbia In 2003, Anadarko had continued success in the Slave Point program at Adsett in northeast British Columbia. Three exploration and two development wells were drilled in 2003 with a success rate of 71%. The Company also acquired 263 square miles of 3-D seismic in the area and is drilling to test the western extent of the Adsett field. Anadarko recently expanded infrastructure capacity from 45 MMcf/d to 50 MMcf/d of gas and plans to add an additional 5 MMcf/d of capacity in 2004.
Saskatchewan During 2003, the Company drilled and completed 106 shallow gas wells with an overall success rate of 92%. In the Hatton area, the Company drilled 65 operated wells and participated in another 16 non-operated wells. Net production from the Hatton area averaged 71 MMcf/d of gas in 2003.
Northwest Territories In the southern Northwest Territories near Fort Liard, the Company drilled nine exploratory wells (100% WI) in 2003. Initial tests from the wells were encouraging and consequently the Company filed four discovery applications. Anadarko also participated in a development well in the Liard area that tested at a rate of 30 MMcf/d of gas. In 2004, Anadarko will participate in the drilling of an exploratory well (37% WI) on Block EL-384 in the Mackenzie Delta.
16
17
Properties and Activities Algeria
Overview Anadarko is engaged in exploration, development and production activities in Algerias Sahara Desert. At the end of 2003, six fields discovered by the Company were on production. Anadarko has developed a good working relationship with Sonatrach, the national oil and gas enterprise of Algeria, its principal partner within Algeria. Sonatrach has owned shares of the Companys common stock since 1986 and at year-end 2003 was the registered owner of 4.8% of Anadarkos outstanding common stock.
Contracts and Partners
Block 406b Production Sharing Agreement The Company has a separate exploration license for Block 406b in which it has a 60% interest.
Block 403c/e Production Sharing Agreement Anadarko has exploration rights over Block 403c/e. Anadarko holds a 67% interest in the exploration phase of this venture.
Development
18
19
Block 404 Ourhoud Central Production Facility Anadarko is also actively involved in developing the Ourhoud field, the second largest oil field in Algeria. Located in the southern portion of Block 404, the Ourhoud field extends into Block 406a and Block 405 and is unitized with the companies with interests in those blocks. The field is operated by the Ourhoud Organization, which represents the interests of the three associations involved in this development. Production from the field commenced in late 2002. Ourhoud became fully operational during the first half of 2003 with facility capacity reaching 230 MBbls/d of oil. Production from the Ourhoud field averaged 174 MBbls/d of oil (gross) in 2003. A total of 14 productive wells were drilled in the Ourhoud field in 2003.
Block 208 Anadarko also has several fields farther south on Block 208; these include the El Merk field (EMK), the El Kheit Et Tessekha field (EKT), the El Merk East field (EME) and the El Merk North field (EMN). During 2003, the Exploitation License Applications were approved for these fields by the Ministry of Energy and Mines. Anadarko will proceed with design and anticipates awarding the Engineering, Procurement and Construction contract for a third Central Production Facility by mid-2005. During 2003, a total of nine wells were drilled in the Block 208 fields with a 100% success rate.
Exploration
Block 406b The license for Block 406b has a three-year initial term. A work program commitment includes seismic acquisition and one exploration well. A 735-mile proprietary 2-D seismic acquisition program has been completed on this 686,000 acre block, located in the Berkine basin to the east of Anadarkos other license areas. During 2003, the new data was processed and interpreted to develop the prospect inventory for the permit. The first exploration well on the block will be drilled in 2004. The first exploration period expires in December 2004.
Block 403c/e The license for Block 403c/e has a three-year initial term and includes 399,000 acres in the Berkine basin. A work program commitment includes seismic acquisition and one exploration well. During 2003, 1,790 miles of existing seismic data was reprocessed in two phases and a 2-D seismic acquisition program of 65 miles was completed. A 3-D seismic program commenced in late 2003. The Company plans to drill the first exploration well in late 2004. The first exploration period expires in January 2006.
Political unrest continues in Algeria. Anadarko continually monitors the situation and has taken steps to help ensure the safety of employees and the security of its facilities in the remote regions of the Sahara Desert. Anadarko is unable to predict with certainty any effect the current situation may have on activity planned for 2004 and beyond. However, the situation has had no material effect to date on the Companys operations in Algeria, where the Company has had activities since 1989. See Regulatory Matters and Additional Factors Affecting Business Foreign Operations Risk under Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
20
Properties and Activities Other International
Overview The Companys other international oil and gas production and development operations are located primarily in Venezuela and Qatar. The Company also has an interest in a non-operated producing property in offshore Egypt, interests in two non-operated offshore producing properties in Australia and an operated interest in exploratory and development acreage in Oman. The Company currently has exploration acreage in Qatar, Tunisia, West Africa, the Faroe Islands, off the coast of Georgia in the Black Sea and other selected areas. In the process of evaluating the allocation of capital resources to international areas for 2004, the Company decided to narrow the list of international projects. While Management sees an important place for international projects within its portfolio, this strategy was implemented to better focus the Companys international efforts. During 2004, the Company expects to work toward divesting the non-core assets located in Oman, Egypt and Australia.
Venezuela The Companys Venezuelan operation consists of the Oritupano-Leona contract area, a risk service contract in which the Company has a non-operated 45% participating interest. The area covers 395,000 gross (178,000 net) acres and had 274 producing wells at year-end 2003. The Companys net oil sales volumes from the area averaged 12 MBbls/d during 2003. The development and exploitation program in 2003 included three new well completions and the conversion of 26 idle wells to producing wells. During 2004, the Company expects to continue with the development of the Oritupano-Leona contract area, focusing most of the activities on recompleting and reactivating existing wells.
Qatar Anadarko is operator and has a 92.5% interest in the Al Rayyan field, which is part of an Exploration and Production Sharing Agreement covering Blocks 12 and 13. Production from the Al Rayyan field, which is located in the northern part of Block 12, averaged 8 MBbls/d of oil (net) during 2003. During 2003, a new permanent production platform was installed, the existing wells were tied back, several workovers were conducted and two previously untested wells were brought online. Production in 2003 was less than expected because forecasted development drilling was delayed, water production from several wells was higher than anticipated and completion of the production facility was delayed primarily due to weather constraints. At year-end 2003, the field was producing 18 MBbls/d of oil (10 MBbls/d net) from 12 wells. During 2004, the Company plans to reevaluate potential infill drilling, recompletion and workover opportunities, pending the results of a full field reservoir stimulation study that is expected to be completed in early 2004.
21
Tunisia The Company operates two blocks in the Ghadames basin of Tunisia. The Company has a 61% interest in the Anaguid Block, which covers 1,100,000 acres and a 100% interest in the Jenein Nord Block, which covers 384,000 acres. The acreage is on trend with the Companys discoveries in Algeria to the west. During 2003, the CEM-1 well encountered 95 feet of pay and tested at a rate of 4 MMcf/d of gas and 500 barrels of condensate per day. A second well, the SEA-1, encountered 52 feet of net pay in the same section. Both of these Anaguid wells have been suspended pending the evaluation of commercial development plans.
West Africa Anadarko is the operator and holds a 50% interest in the Agali Block, offshore Gabon. During 2003, the Company secured an amendment to its production sharing contract that allows the obligation well to be drilled after the boundary dispute between Gabon and its northern neighbor, Equatorial Guinea, is resolved.
North Atlantic Margin In the Faroe Islands, Anadarko is the operator and sole licensee of License 007 and holds a 28% interest in the adjacent non-operated License 006. The licenses cover a total of 617,000 acres. In 2003, the Company completed its technical evaluation of these blocks and secured a two year extension on License 007 until August 2005. During 2004, Anadarko plans to seek a partner to evaluate this block. The Company has no outstanding drilling commitments in the region.
Georgia Black Sea Anadarko has a Production Sharing Contract with the State of Georgia. The agreement gives Anadarko exploration rights to three blocks covering approximately 2,000,000 acres on the Black Sea Continental Shelf and extending 50 miles offshore. During 2003, the Company conducted geophysical and geological studies and Anadarko is currently seeking partners to share costs and reduce risk in future seismic or drilling activities.
Drilling Programs
The Companys 2003 drilling program focused on known oil and gas provinces in the United States (Lower 48, Alaska and Gulf of Mexico), Canada and Algeria. Exploration activity consisted of 147 wells, including 36 wells in the Lower 48, one well in Alaska, seven wells offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, 92 wells in Canada, six wells in Algeria and five wells in other international locations. Development activity consisted of 922 wells, which included 622 wells in the Lower 48, eight wells in Alaska, 12 wells offshore in the Gulf of Mexico, 252 wells in Canada, 21 wells in Algeria and seven wells in other international locations.
22
Drilling Statistics
The following table shows the results of the oil and gas wells drilled and tested:
Net Exploratory | Net Development | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Productive | Dry Holes | Total | Productive | Dry Holes | Total | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2003
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States
|
22.2 | 16.3 | 38.5 | 452.1 | 14.4 | 466.5 | 505.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Canada
|
64.6 | 7.3 | 71.9 | 183.7 | 5.5 | 189.2 | 261.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Algeria
|
1.5 | 1.5 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 0.3 | 4.3 | 7.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other International
|
1.0 | 2.2 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 7.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
89.3 | 27.3 | 116.6 | 643.3 | 21.2 | 664.5 | 781.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2002
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States
|
34.0 | 13.8 | 47.8 | 275.2 | 5.1 | 280.3 | 328.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Canada
|
30.6 | 6.8 | 37.4 | 305.6 | 4.0 | 309.6 | 347.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Algeria
|
0.5 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 7.3 | 0.7 | 8.0 | 9.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other International
|
| 3.7 | 3.7 | 3.7 | 0.9 | 4.6 | 8.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
65.1 | 25.3 | 90.4 | 591.8 | 10.7 | 602.5 | 692.9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2001
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States
|
33.6 | 18.3 | 51.9 | 544.0 | 8.4 | 552.4 | 604.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Canada
|
28.0 | 6.0 | 34.0 | 381.1 | 18.0 | 399.1 | 433.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Algeria
|
| | | 3.5 | 0.2 | 3.7 | 3.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other International
|
| 2.7 | 2.7 | 11.4 | | 11.4 | 14.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
61.6 | 27.0 | 88.6 | 940.0 | 26.6 | 966.6 | 1,055.2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
The following table shows the number of wells in the process of drilling or in active completion stages and the number of wells suspended or waiting on completion as of December 31, 2003:
Wells in the process | |||||||||||||||||
of drilling or | Wells suspended or | ||||||||||||||||
in active completion | waiting on completion | ||||||||||||||||
Exploration | Development | Exploration | Development | ||||||||||||||
United States
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
4 | 84 | 12 | 5 | |||||||||||||
Net
|
4.0 | 59.0 | 10.4 | 5.0 | |||||||||||||
Canada
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
13 | 26 | 8 | 17 | |||||||||||||
Net
|
7.0 | 16.0 | 7.1 | 12.7 | |||||||||||||
Algeria
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
1 | 2 | | | |||||||||||||
Net
|
0.5 | 0.3 | | | |||||||||||||
Other International
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
| | 2 | | |||||||||||||
Net
|
| | 1.2 | | |||||||||||||
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
18 | 112 | 22 | 22 | |||||||||||||
Net
|
11.5 | 75.3 | 18.7 | 17.7 |
23
Productive Wells
As of December 31, 2003, the Company had a working interest ownership in productive wells as follows:
Oil Wells* | Gas Wells* | ||||||||
United States
|
|||||||||
Gross
|
9,347 | 10,704 | |||||||
Net
|
7,105.2 | 7,149.6 | |||||||
Canada
|
|||||||||
Gross
|
871 | 3,652 | |||||||
Net
|
622.5 | 2,940.9 | |||||||
Algeria
|
|||||||||
Gross
|
122 | | |||||||
Net
|
25.9 | | |||||||
Other International
|
|||||||||
Gross
|
304 | | |||||||
Net
|
138.6 | | |||||||
Total
|
|||||||||
Gross
|
10,644 | 14,356 | |||||||
Net
|
7,892.2 | 10,090.5 |
* | Includes wells containing multiple completions as follows: |
Gross
|
394 | 2,147 | ||||||
Net
|
328.0 | 1,612.4 |
Properties and Leases
The following schedule shows the number of developed lease, undeveloped lease and fee mineral acres in which Anadarko held interests at December 31, 2003:
Developed | Undeveloped | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lease | Lease | Fee Minerals | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | Gross | Net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
thousands | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
United States
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Onshore Lower 48
|
2,964 | 1,980 | 2,570 | 1,921 | 9,527 | 8,478 | 15,061 | 12,379 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offshore
|
620 | 325 | 1,498 | 1,121 | | | 2,118 | 1,446 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alaska
|
24 | 5 | 3,176 | 1,659 | 16 | 8 | 3,216 | 1,672 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
3,608 | 2,310 | 7,244 | 4,701 | 9,543 | 8,486 | 20,395 | 15,497 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Canada
|
1,834 | 1,037 | 9,124 | 3,310 | 606 | 606 | 11,564 | 4,953 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Algeria*
|
221 | 54 | 3,773 | 1,167 | | | 3,994 | 1,221 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other International
|
569 | 155 | 21,957 | 8,940 | | | 22,526 | 9,095 |
* | Developed acreage in Algeria relates only to areas with an Exploitation License. A portion of the undeveloped acreage in Algeria will be relinquished in the future upon finalization of Exploitation License boundaries. |
24
Marketing and Gathering Properties and Activities
Marketing The Companys marketing department actively manages the sale of Anadarkos oil, natural gas and NGLs production. The Company markets its production to creditworthy customers at competitive prices, maximizing realized prices while managing credit exposure. The Company also purchases volumes for resale primarily from partners and producers near Anadarkos production. These purchases allow the Company to aggregate larger volumes and attract larger, creditworthy customers, which in turn enhance the value of the Companys production.
Gas Gathering Anadarko owns and operates seven major gas gathering systems in the United States, where the Company has substantial gas production. The systems are: Antioch Gathering System in the Southwest Antioch field of Oklahoma; Sneed System in the West Panhandle field of Texas; Hugoton Gathering System in southwest Kansas; Dew Gathering System in east Texas; Pinnacle Gathering System in east Texas; CJV/ SEC Gathering System in the Carthage field of east Texas; and, Vernon Gathering System in the Vernon field of north Louisiana.
Minerals Properties and Activities
The Companys minerals properties contribute to operating income through non-operated joint venture and royalty arrangements in coal, trona and industrial mineral mines across the Companys extensive fee mineral interest in the Land Grant. The Company reinvests the cash flow from its hard minerals operations primarily into its oil and gas operations.
Segment and Geographic Information
Information on operations by segment and geographic location is contained in Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
25
Employees
As of December 31, 2003, the Company had about 3,500 employees. Relations between the Company and its employees are considered to be satisfactory. The Company has had no significant work stoppages or strikes pertaining to its employees.
Regulatory Matters and Additional Factors Affecting Business
See Regulatory Matters and Additional Factors Affecting Business under Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
Title to Properties
As is customary in the oil and gas industry, only a preliminary title examination is conducted at the time properties believed to be suitable for drilling operations are acquired by the Company. Prior to the commencement of drilling operations, a thorough title examination of the drill site tract is conducted and curative work is performed with respect to significant defects, if any, before proceeding with operations. A thorough title examination has been performed with respect to substantially all leasehold producing properties owned by the Company. Anadarko believes the title to its leasehold properties is good and defensible in accordance with standards generally acceptable in the oil and gas industry subject to such exceptions that, in the opinion of counsel employed in the various areas in which the Company has conducted exploration activities, are not so material as to detract substantially from the use of such properties.
Capital Spending
See Capital Resources and Liquidity under Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends
Anadarkos ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 5.83 and earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends was 5.71 for the year ended December 31, 2003. Anadarkos ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 3.83 and earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends was 3.74 for the year ended December 31, 2002. As a result of the Companys net loss in 2001, Anadarkos earnings did not cover fixed charges by $599 million and did not cover combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends by $610 million.
Item 2. Properties
Information on Properties is contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K and in Note 19 Commitments of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
26
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
General The Company is a defendant in a number of lawsuits and is involved in governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including, but not limited to, royalty claims, contract claims and environmental claims. The Company has also been named as a defendant in various personal injury claims, including numerous claims by employees of third-party contractors alleging exposure to asbestos, silica and benzene while working at a refinery in Corpus Christi, Texas, which a company Anadarko acquired by merger in 2000 sold in segments in 1987 and 1989. While the ultimate outcome and impact on the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, Management believes that the resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Company, although results of operations and cash flow could be significantly impacted in the reporting periods in which such matters are resolved. Discussed below are several specific proceedings.
Royalty Litigation The Company is subject to various claims from its royalty owners in the regular course of its business as an oil and gas producer, including disputes regarding measurement, costs and expenses beyond the wellhead, and basis valuations. Among such claims, the Company was named as a defendant in a case styled U.S. of America ex rel. Harold E. Wright v. AGIP Company, et al. (the Gas Qui Tam case) filed in September 2000 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division. This lawsuit generally alleges that the Company and 118 other defendants improperly measured and otherwise undervalued natural gas in connection with a payment of royalties on production from federal and Indian lands. Based on the Companys present understanding of the various governmental and False Claims Act proceedings described above, the Company believes that it has substantial defenses to these claims and intends to vigorously assert such defenses. However, if the Company is found to have violated the Civil False Claims Act, the Company could be subject to a variety of sanctions, including treble damages and substantial monetary fines. The case was transferred to the U.S. District Court, Multi-District Litigation (MDL) Docket pending in Wyoming. All defendants jointly filed a motion to dismiss the action on jurisdictional grounds based on Mr. Wrights failure to qualify as the original source of the information underlying his fraud claims, and the Company filed additional motions to dismiss on separate grounds. The MDL Panel remanded the case to the federal court in Lufkin, Texas without ruling on the motions for dismissal. The proceedings were delayed for procedural reasons as the case was remanded and a new judge was appointed; however, the Company now expects to obtain a hearing on its motions for dismissal in early 2004.
27
T-Bar X Lawsuit T-Bar X Limited Company v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, a case filed in the 82nd Judicial District Court of Robertson County, Texas, involves a dispute regarding a confidentiality agreement that Anadarko executed in August 1999. On January 28, 2004, based upon a jury verdict, the court entered a $145 million judgment in favor of the plaintiff as follows: $40 million in actual damages; $100 million in punitive damages; and, $5 million in pre-judgment interest. The Company believes that it has strong arguments for a reversal on appeal. Anadarko and outside counsel believe that, following appeals, it is not probable that the judgment will be affirmed. If a judgment is reversed and remanded for a new trial, Anadarko will vigorously defend itself on retrial. While the ultimate outcome and impact of this claim on Anadarko cannot be predicted with certainty, Anadarko believes that the resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position.
CITGO Litigation CITGO Petroleum Corporations (CITGO) claims arise out of an Asset Purchase and Contribution Agreement in 1987 whereby a company Anadarko acquired by merger in 2000 sold a refinery located in Corpus Christi, Texas to CITGOs predecessor. After the sale of the refinery, numerous individuals living near the refinery sued CITGO (the Neighborhood Litigation) thereby implicating the Asset Purchase and Contribution Agreement indemnity provision. CITGO and Anadarko eventually entered into a settlement agreement to allocate, on an interim basis, each partys liability for defense and liability cost in that and related litigation. That agreement provides that once the Neighborhood Litigation and certain related claims are resolved, then the parties will determine their final indemnity obligations to each other through binding arbitration. At the present time, Anadarko and CITGO have agreed to defer arbitrating the allocation of responsibility for this liability in order to focus their efforts on a global settlement. Arbitration will resume upon request of either CITGO or Anadarko. Negotiations and discussions with CITGO continue. Anadarko has offered to settle all outstanding issues for approximately $4 million and a liability for this amount has been accrued.
Kansas Ad Valorem Tax The Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 allowed a severance, production or similar tax to be included as an add-on, over and above the maximum lawful price charged for natural gas. Based on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) ruling that the Kansas ad valorem tax was such a tax, the Company collected the Kansas ad valorem tax. FERCs ruling regarding the ability of producers to collect the Kansas ad valorem tax was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit). Ultimately, the D.C. Circuit issued a decision on August 2, 1996 ruling that producers must refund all Kansas ad valorem taxes collected relating to production since October 1983. The Company filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court. That petition was denied on May 12, 1997.
Other The Company is subject to other legal proceedings, claims and liabilities which arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of the Company, the liability with respect to these actions will not have a material effect on the Company.
28
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2003.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Age at End | ||||||
Name | of 2004 | Position | ||||
James T. Hackett
|
50 |
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
||||
James R. Larson
|
54 |
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer
|
||||
Richard J. Sharples
|
57 |
Senior Vice President, Marketing and Minerals
|
||||
Robert P. Daniels
|
45 |
Vice President, Canada
|
||||
Diane L. Dickey
|
48 |
Vice President and Controller
|
||||
James J. Emme
|
48 |
Vice President, Exploration
|
||||
Morris L. Helbach
|
59 |
Vice President, Information Technology Services
and Chief Information Officer
|
||||
Karl F. Kurz
|
43 |
Vice President, Marketing
|
||||
David R. Larson
|
47 |
Vice President, Investor Relations
|
||||
Richard A. Lewis
|
60 |
Vice President, Human Resources
|
||||
J. Anthony Meyer
|
46 |
Vice President, International and Alaska
Operations
|
||||
Mark L. Pease
|
48 |
Vice President, U. S. Onshore and Offshore
|
||||
Gregory M. Pensabene
|
54 |
Vice President, Government Relations and Public
Affairs
|
||||
Albert L. Richey
|
55 |
Vice President and Treasurer
|
||||
Charlene A. Ripley
|
40 |
Vice President and General Counsel
|
||||
Suzanne Suter
|
58 |
Vice President, Corporate Secretary and Chief
Governance Officer
|
||||
Donald R. Willis
|
54 |
Vice President, Corporate Services
|
In December 2003, Mr. Hackett was named President and Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining Anadarko, he served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Devon Energy Corporation since its acquisition of Ocean Energy, Inc. in April 2003. Mr. Hackett served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Ocean Energy, Inc. from March 1999 to April 2003 and as Chairman of the Board from January 2000 to April 2003. He served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Seagull Energy Corporation from September 1998 until March 1999 and as Chairman of the Board from January 1999 to March 1999.
29
Officers of Anadarko are elected at an organizational meeting of the Board of Directors following the annual meeting of stockholders, which is expected to occur on May 6, 2004, and hold office until their successors are duly elected and shall have qualified. There are no family relationships between any directors or executive officers of Anadarko.
30
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Information on the market price and cash dividends declared per share of common stock is included in the Stockholder Information in the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2003 Annual Report (Annual Report) which is incorporated herein by reference.
First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||||||
Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | |||||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||||||
2003
|
$ | 24 | $ | 25 | $ | 25 | $ | 35 | ||||||||
2002
|
$ | 18 | $ | 18 | $ | 20 | $ | 24 |
The amount of future common stock dividends will depend on earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors, and will be determined by the Directors on a quarterly basis. For additional information, see Dividends under Item 7 of this Form 10-K.
Equity Compensation Plan Table The following table sets forth information with respect to the equity compensation plans available to directors, officers and employees of the Company as of December 31, 2003:
(c) | ||||||||||||
Number of securities | ||||||||||||
(a) | (b) | remaining available | ||||||||||
Number of securities | Weighted-average | for future issuance | ||||||||||
to be issued upon | exercise price of | under equity | ||||||||||
exercise of | outstanding | compensation plans | ||||||||||
outstanding options, | options, warrants | (excluding securities | ||||||||||
Plan category | warrants and rights | and rights | reflected in column(a)) | |||||||||
Equity compensation plans approved by security
holders
|
12,585,670 | $ | 43.28 | 2,158,720 | ||||||||
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders
|
| | | |||||||||
Total
|
12,585,670 | $ | 43.28 | 2,158,720 |
Unregistered Securities In March 2001, Anadarko issued $650 million of Zero Yield Puttable Contingent Debt Securities (ZYP-CODES) due 2021 to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A and non-U.S. persons under Regulation S. The initial purchaser of the ZYP-CODES was Lehman Brothers Inc. Debt offering expenses related to issuing these securities were $6 million. The ZYP-CODES were subsequently registered on a Form S-3 effective July 2001.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
See Five Year Financial Highlights in the Annual Report, which is incorporated herein by reference.
31
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Anadarko Petroleum Corporations primary line of business is the exploration, development, production and marketing of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs. The Companys major areas of operations are located in the United States, Canada and Algeria. The Company is also active in Venezuela, Qatar and several other countries. The Companys focus is on adding high-margin oil and natural gas reserves at competitive finding and development costs and continuing to develop more efficient and effective ways of producing oil and gas. The primary factors that affect the Companys results of operations include, among other things, commodity prices for natural gas, crude oil and NGLs, production volumes, the Companys ability to find additional oil and gas reserves, as well as the cost of finding reserves and changes in the levels of costs and expenses required for continuing operations. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Anadarko or Company refer to Anadarko and its subsidiaries.
Selected Data
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions except per share amounts | ||||||||||||
Financial Results
|
||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 5,122 | $ | 3,845 | $ | 4,718 | ||||||
Costs and expenses
|
2,914 | 2,435 | 5,081 | |||||||||
Interest expense and other (income) expense
|
234 | 203 | 27 | |||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
729 | 376 | (214 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common
stockholders
|
$ | 1,287 | $ | 825 | $ | (188 | ) | |||||
Earnings (loss) per share diluted
|
$ | 5.09 | $ | 3.21 | $ | (0.75 | ) | |||||
Operating Results
|
||||||||||||
Annual sales volumes (MMBOE)
|
192 | 197 | 199 | |||||||||
Worldwide reserve replacement (% of production)
|
196 | % | 112 | % | 221 | % | ||||||
Worldwide finding cost ($/BOE)
|
$ | 6.95 | $ | 10.52 | $ | 8.53 | ||||||
Total proved reserves (MMBOE)
|
2,513 | 2,328 | 2,305 | |||||||||
Capital Resources and Liquidity
|
||||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
$ | 2,792 | $ | 2,388 | $ | 3,316 | ||||||
Cash flow from operating activities
|
3,043 | 2,196 | 3,321 | |||||||||
Total debt
|
5,058 | 5,471 | 5,050 | |||||||||
Stockholders equity
|
$ | 8,599 | $ | 6,972 | $ | 6,365 | ||||||
Debt capitalization ratio
|
37 | % | 44 | % | 44 | % |
Financial Results
Net Income Anadarkos net income available to common stockholders for 2003 totaled nearly $1.3 billion, or $5.09 per share (diluted), compared to net income available to common stockholders for 2002 of $825 million, or $3.21 per share (diluted). The increase in net income in 2003 is due primarily to significantly higher commodity prices, partially offset by higher costs and expenses. Anadarko had a net loss available to common stockholders in 2001 of $188 million or $0.75 per share (diluted). The net loss for 2001 included noncash charges of $2.5 billion ($1.6 billion after taxes) for impairments of the carrying value of oil and gas properties primarily in the United States, Canada and Argentina as a result of low natural gas and oil prices at the end of the third quarter of 2001. See Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.
32
Revenues
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Gas sales
|
$ | 2,851 | $ | 1,828 | $ | 2,952 | ||||||
Oil and condensate sales
|
1,787 | 1,682 | 1,397 | |||||||||
Natural gas liquids sales
|
365 | 222 | 256 | |||||||||
Other sales
|
119 | 113 | 113 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 5,122 | $ | 3,845 | $ | 4,718 | ||||||
Anadarkos total revenues for 2003 increased $1.3 billion or 33% compared to 2002 due primarily to significantly higher commodity prices, partially offset by slightly lower sales volumes. Total revenues for 2002 were down $873 million or 19% compared to 2001 due primarily to a significant decrease in natural gas prices and decreases in natural gas volumes, partially offset by higher crude oil prices and volumes.
Analysis of Sales Volumes
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Barrels of Oil Equivalent (MMBOE)
|
|||||||||||||
United States
|
135 | 130 | 144 | ||||||||||
Canada
|
30 | 35 | 34 | ||||||||||
Algeria
|
19 | 24 | 8 | ||||||||||
Other International
|
8 | 8 | 13 | ||||||||||
Total
|
192 | 197 | 199 | ||||||||||
Barrels of Oil Equivalent per Day
(MBOE/d)
|
|||||||||||||
United States
|
368 | 355 | 394 | ||||||||||
Canada
|
83 | 97 | 93 | ||||||||||
Algeria
|
52 | 65 | 22 | ||||||||||
Other International
|
22 | 22 | 37 | ||||||||||
Total
|
525 | 539 | 546 | ||||||||||
During 2003, Anadarko sold 192 MMBOE, a decrease of 5 MMBOE or 3% compared to sales of 197 MMBOE in 2002. The decrease for 2003 was primarily due to lower volumes of 5 MMBOE from operations in Canada, related primarily to the divestiture of heavy oil properties in late 2002 and 5 MMBOE from operations in Algeria due primarily to the substantial completion of cost recovery, whereby Anadarko was reimbursed for previous exploration spending with additional barrels of oil production. These decreases were partially offset by higher volumes of 5 MMBOE from operations in the United States, primarily due to higher oil production in the western states as a result of the acquisition of Howell in late 2002. The Companys sales volumes were down 2 MMBOE or 1% in 2002 compared to sales of 199 MMBOE in 2001. The decrease for 2002 was primarily due to lower volumes of 14 MMBOE due to operations in the United States, primarily offshore and in Texas and Louisiana, and 4 MMBOE related to the disposition of operations in Guatemala and Argentina in 2001. The decrease in volumes in the United States was primarily a result of natural production declines and a decrease in development drilling in late 2001 and early 2002 in response to lower commodity prices. These lower volumes were offset by an increase of 16 MMBOE in Algeria due to the expansion of production facilities.
33
Natural Gas Sales Volumes and Average Prices
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
United States (Bcf)
|
503 | 507 | 573 | ||||||||||
MMcf/d
|
1,379 | 1,390 | 1,569 | ||||||||||
Price per Mcf
|
$ | 4.36 | $ | 2.83 | $ | 4.23 | |||||||
Canada (Bcf)
|
140 | 135 | 121 | ||||||||||
MMcf/d
|
383 | 370 | 331 | ||||||||||
Price per Mcf
|
$ | 4.71 | $ | 2.91 | $ | 4.38 | |||||||
Other International (Bcf)
|
| | 1 | ||||||||||
MMcf/d
|
| | 4 | ||||||||||
Price per Mcf
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 1.22 | |||||||
Total (Bcf)
|
643 | 642 | 695 | ||||||||||
MMcf/d
|
1,762 | 1,760 | 1,904 | ||||||||||
Price per Mcf
|
$ | 4.43 | $ | 2.85 | $ | 4.25 |
Anadarkos natural gas sales volumes for 2003 were essentially flat compared to 2002. An increase in natural gas sales volumes in Texas, Louisiana and Canada due to successful exploration and development activities was offset by a decrease in the Gulf of Mexico, as a result of temporary operational issues and natural production declines. The Companys natural gas sales volumes in 2002 were down 53 Bcf or 8% compared to 2001. The decrease in 2002 was due primarily to lower volumes of 66 Bcf from operations within the United States, primarily offshore and in Texas, partially offset by higher volumes of 14 Bcf from operations in Canada primarily due to the Berkley acquisition in 2001. Production of natural gas is generally not directly affected by seasonal swings in demand. However, the Company may decide during periods of low commodity prices to decrease development activity, which can result in lower production volumes.
34
Crude Oil and Condensate Sales Volumes and Average Prices
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
United States (MMBbls)
|
34 | 31 | 34 | ||||||||||
MBbls/d
|
93 | 85 | 93 | ||||||||||
Price per barrel
|
$ | 26.16 | $ | 22.90 | $ | 23.08 | |||||||
Canada (MMBbls)
|
6 | 12 | 13 | ||||||||||
MBbls/d
|
17 | 33 | 35 | ||||||||||
Price per barrel
|
$ | 27.33 | $ | 19.09 | $ | 18.18 | |||||||
Algeria (MMBbls)
|
19 | 24 | 8 | ||||||||||
MBbls/d
|
52 | 65 | 22 | ||||||||||
Price per barrel
|
$ | 28.43 | $ | 24.38 | $ | 23.97 | |||||||
Other International (MMBbls)
|
8 | 8 | 13 | ||||||||||
MBbls/d
|
22 | 22 | 36 | ||||||||||
Price per barrel
|
$ | 23.15 | $ | 19.92 | $ | 14.35 | |||||||
Total (MMBbls)
|
67 | 75 | 68 | ||||||||||
MBbls/d
|
184 | 205 | 186 | ||||||||||
Price per barrel
|
$ | 26.55 | $ | 22.44 | $ | 20.56 |
Anadarkos crude oil and condensate sales volumes for 2003 decreased 8 MMBbls or 11% compared to 2002 due to lower volumes of 6 MMBbls in Canada and 5 MMBbls in Algeria, partially offset by higher volumes of 3 MMBbls in the United States. The lower Canada volumes are due largely to the sale of the Companys heavy oil assets in late 2002. The lower Algeria volumes are due primarily to the substantial completion of cost recovery, whereby Anadarko was reimbursed for previous exploration spending with additional barrels of oil production. The higher volumes in the United States are primarily in the western states as a result of the Howell acquisition in late 2002.
Natural Gas Liquids Sales Volumes and Average Prices
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
Total (MMBbls)
|
17 | 15 | 15 | ||||||||||
MBbls/d
|
47 | 41 | 42 | ||||||||||
Price per barrel
|
$ | 21.18 | $ | 14.80 | $ | 16.55 |
35
The Companys 2003 NGLs sales volumes increased 2 MMBbls or 13% compared to 2002 primarily due to additional natural gas volumes processed in central Texas. NGLs sales volumes in 2002 were essentially flat compared to 2001.
Costs and Expenses
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
|||||||||||||
Direct operating
|
$ | 630 | $ | 577 | $ | 553 | |||||||
Cost of product and transportation
|
198 | 170 | 216 | ||||||||||
Total operating expenses
|
828 | 747 | 769 | ||||||||||
Administrative and general
|
352 | 314 | 292 | ||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
1,297 | 1,121 | 1,154 | ||||||||||
Other taxes
|
294 | 214 | 247 | ||||||||||
Impairments related to oil and gas properties
|
103 | 39 | 2,546 | ||||||||||
Restructuring costs
|
40 | | | ||||||||||
Amortization of goodwill
|
| | 73 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,914 | $ | 2,435 | $ | 5,081 | |||||||
During 2003, Anadarkos costs and expenses increased $479 million or 20% compared to 2002 due to the following factors:
| Operating expenses increased $81 million (11%) due to increases of $53 million in direct operating expenses and $28 million in cost of product and transportation expenses. The increase in direct operating expenses is due primarily to the acquisition of producing properties in the western states in late 2002 and the Gulf of Mexico in 2003, an increase in electricity, fuel and other lease expenses attributed to the effect of increased commodity prices and the impact of an increase in the Canadian exchange rate. These increases were partially offset by the effect of the sale of heavy oil properties in Canada in late 2002. The increase in cost of product and transportation expenses was due primarily to an increase in volumes of NGLs processed and higher transportation rates. | |
| Administrative and general (A&G) expense increased $38 million (12%). A&G expense in 2003 included $24 million in benefits expenses and $8 million in salaries expenses related to executive transitions during 2003. Excluding executive transition expenses, A&G expense increased $17 million for the first six months of 2003 and decreased $11 million in the last half of 2003 as a result of the cost reduction plan implemented in July 2003. | |
| DD&A expense increased $176 million (16%). DD&A increases include about $180 million primarily due to higher costs associated with finding and developing oil and gas reserves (including the transfer of excluded costs to the DD&A pool), $20 million due to asset retirement obligation accretion expense related to SFAS No. 143 and $8 million related to higher DD&A on general properties. These increases were partially offset by a $32 million decrease due to lower production volumes. | |
| Other taxes increased $80 million (37%) due primarily to significantly higher commodity prices. | |
| Impairments of oil and gas properties in 2003 are due to a $68 million ceiling test impairment for Qatar as a result of lower future production estimates and unsuccessful exploration activities as well as $35 million related to unsuccessful exploration activities in Australia ($19 million), Gabon ($7 million), Tunisia ($7 million), Angola ($1 million) and Kazakhstan ($1 million). | |
| Restructuring costs of $40 million related to one-time charges for employee termination benefits, primarily severance payments, and other costs associated with the Companys cost reduction plan. |
36
During 2002, Anadarkos costs and expenses decreased $2.6 billion or 52% compared to 2001 due to the following factors:
| Operating expenses decreased $22 million (3%) due to a decrease in cost of product and transportation expenses related primarily to a decrease in costs associated with processing NGLs, partially offset by an increase in direct operating expenses primarily related to the acquisition of producing properties in Qatar in the second half of 2001. | |
| A&G expense increased $22 million (8%). An increase of $58 million due primarily to increases in benefits and salaries expenses associated with the Companys workforce was partially offset by a $31 million decrease in merger related expenses and a $5 million decrease related to an adjustment to provisions for uncollectible accounts. | |
| DD&A expense decreased $33 million (3%). About $180 million of the decrease is related to the DD&A rate reduction as a result of ceiling test impairments in the third quarter of 2001 and $13 million of the decrease is due to slightly lower production volumes. These decreases were partially offset by an increase of approximately $135 million due to increases in the DD&A rate resulting from higher costs associated with finding and developing oil and gas reserves (including the transfer of excluded costs to the DD&A pool) and an increase of $25 million related to DD&A on general properties. | |
| Other taxes decreased $33 million (13%). The decrease is primarily due to a $40 million decrease in production taxes as a result of lower commodity prices and slightly lower production volumes in 2002, partially offset by higher ad valorem taxes. | |
| Impairments of oil and gas properties in 2002 related primarily to unsuccessful exploration activities in Congo ($16 million), Oman ($10 million), Australia ($7 million) and Tunisia ($5 million). Impairments in 2001 were primarily due to low oil and gas prices at the end of the third quarter of 2001, which resulted in ceiling test impairments for the United States ($1.7 billion), Canada ($808 million) and Argentina ($15 million). | |
| Amortization of goodwill was discontinued in 2002 in accordance with SFAS No. 142. |
Interest Expense and Other (Income) Expense
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Interest Expense
|
||||||||||||
Gross interest expense
|
$ | 374 | $ | 358 | $ | 301 | ||||||
Capitalized interest
|
(121 | ) | (155 | ) | (209 | ) | ||||||
Net interest expense
|
253 | 203 | 92 | |||||||||
Other (Income) Expense
|
||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange
|
(19 | ) | 1 | 29 | ||||||||
Firm transportation keep-whole contract valuation
|
(9 | ) | (35 | ) | (91 | ) | ||||||
Ineffectiveness of derivative financial
instruments
|
9 | 18 | (18 | ) | ||||||||
Gas sales contracts accretion of
discount
|
7 | 11 | 14 | |||||||||
Other
|
(7 | ) | 5 | 1 | ||||||||
Total Other (Income) Expense
|
(19 | ) | | (65 | ) | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 234 | $ | 203 | $ | 27 | ||||||
Interest Expense Anadarkos gross interest expense has increased over the past three years due primarily to higher levels of borrowings for capital expenditures, including corporate and producing property acquisitions. Gross interest expense in 2003 increased 4% compared to 2002 primarily due to the expensing of debt issuance costs related to the Company redeeming the Zero Coupon Convertible Debentures due 2020 in 2003 and slightly higher interest rates caused by the redemption of the Zero Yield Puttable Contingent Debt Securities in 2002, which were put to the Company and replaced with higher rate debt. Gross interest expense in 2002 increased 19% compared to 2001 primarily due to higher average debt outstanding in 2002 primarily because of acquisitions in 2001 and slightly higher interest rates. See Capital Resources and Liquidity.
37
Other (Income) Expense During 2003, foreign exchange gains increased $20 million compared to 2002 due primarily to the impact of the strengthening Canadian dollar on the Companys outstanding Canadian debt that is denominated in the United States dollar. Gains from the firm transportation keep-whole contract valuation decreased $26 million during 2003 primarily due to the effect of lower market values for firm transportation subject to the keep-whole agreement. During 2002, foreign exchange losses decreased $28 million compared to 2001 primarily due to the restructuring of Canadian debt and strengthening of the Canadian dollar. Gains from the firm transportation keep-whole contract valuation decreased $56 million during 2002 primarily due to the effect of lower market values for firm transportation subject to the keep-whole agreement. See Derivative Instruments and Foreign Currency Risk under Item 7a of this Form 10-K.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
$ | 775 | $ | 381 | $ | (183 | ) | |||||
Effect of change in Canadian income tax rate
|
(46 | ) | (5 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 729 | $ | 376 | $ | (214 | ) | |||||
For 2003, income taxes increased $353 million compared to 2002. The increase was primarily due to the increase in earnings before income taxes, partially offset by a decrease in Canadian taxes due to a Canadian federal income tax rate reduction from 28% to 21% over a five year period beginning in 2003. Income taxes for 2002 increased $590 million compared to 2001. Income taxes for 2001 included a benefit of approximately $962 million related to the impairment of the carrying value of oil and gas properties in the United States, Canada and Argentina as a result of low natural gas and crude oil prices at the end of the third quarter of 2001. Excluding the effect of the impairment and related tax benefit in 2001, income taxes for 2002 decreased primarily due to the decrease in earnings before income taxes.
Operating Results
Anadarko focuses on growth and profitability. Reserve replacement is the key to growth and future profitability depends on the cost of finding oil and gas reserves, among other factors. Reserve growth can be achieved through successful exploration and development drilling, improved recovery or acquisition of producing properties.
Reserve Replacement Anadarko continues to be successful in replacing reserves. For the 22nd consecutive year, Anadarko more than replaced annual production volumes with proved reserves of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs. The following table shows the Companys reserve replacement through all means, including extensions and discoveries, revisions, improved recovery and purchases or sales of proved reserves, as a percentage of production volumes. Reserve replacement percentages excluding acquisitions and divestitures represent reserve replacement achieved through drilling and development.
38
Five-Year | |||||||||||||||||
Average | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||
Worldwide
|
|||||||||||||||||
Reserve replacement
|
310 | % | 196 | % | 112 | % | 221 | % | |||||||||
Reserve replacement excluding acquisitions and
divestitures
|
164 | % | 176 | % | 87 | % | 173 | % | |||||||||
Production (MMBOE)
|
150 | 192 | 196 | 201 | |||||||||||||
United States
|
|||||||||||||||||
Reserve replacement
|
290 | % | 232 | % | 185 | % | 161 | % | |||||||||
Reserve replacement excluding acquisitions and
divestitures
|
168 | % | 204 | % | 137 | % | 160 | % | |||||||||
Production (MMBOE)
|
107 | 135 | 130 | 144 |
The Companys worldwide reserve replacement excluding acquisitions and divestitures increased to 176% in 2003. This increase was primarily due to successful drilling in the U.S. and Canada. The decrease in 2002 compared to 2001 was partially due to a downward revision of 36 MMBOE in Venezuela due to increased prices. See Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates.
Cost of Finding Cost of finding represents the cost of proved reserves added through all means, including additions related to extensions and discoveries, revisions, improved recovery and purchases of proved reserves. The following table shows the Companys cost of finding proved reserves of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs, stated on a BOE basis. Cost of finding excludes asset retirement costs and includes actual asset retirement expenditures.
Five-Year | |||||||||||||||||
Average | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||
Worldwide
|
|||||||||||||||||
Cost of finding
|
$ | 7.65 | $ | 6.95 | $ | 10.52 | $ | 8.53 | |||||||||
Cost of finding excluding acquisitions
|
$ | 8.10 | $ | 7.47 | $ | 13.43 | $ | 8.75 | |||||||||
United States
|
|||||||||||||||||
Cost of finding
|
$ | 8.10 | $ | 6.26 | $ | 7.77 | $ | 9.60 | |||||||||
Cost of finding excluding acquisitions
|
$ | 8.04 | $ | 6.56 | $ | 8.83 | $ | 9.46 |
Worldwide finding costs in 2003 decreased 34% compared to 2002. Worldwide finding costs in 2002 were higher than 2003 and 2001 due primarily to downward revisions of Venezuelan reserves primarily related to higher prices (see Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates) and large investments made in leases in the eastern Gulf of Mexico that had not yet been drilled.
Proved Reserves At the end of 2003, Anadarkos proved reserves were 2.5 billion BOE compared to 2.3 billion BOE at year-end 2002 and 2001. Anadarkos proved reserves have grown 22% over the past three years, primarily as a result of corporate acquisitions, successful exploration projects in the Gulf of Mexico and successful development programs in major domestic fields in core areas onshore and offshore and in Algeria.
39
Recent Developments The SEC obtained information from oil and gas companies operating offshore (including Anadarko) to assess the criteria being used by industry to determine proved reserves related to new field discoveries offshore. The SEC regulations allow companies to recognize proved reserves if economic producibility is supported by either an actual production test (flow test) or conclusive formation testing. In the absence of a production test, compelling technical data must exist to recognize proved reserves related to the initial discovery of a field. In deepwater environments where production tests are extremely expensive, the industry has increasingly depended on advanced technical testing to support economic producibility.
Drilling Activity During 2003, Anadarko participated in a total of 1,069 gross wells, including 707 gas wells, 299 oil wells and 63 dry holes. This compares to 949 gross wells (686 gas wells, 217 oil wells and 46 dry holes) in 2002 and 1,420 gross wells (970 gas wells, 375 oil wells and 75 dry holes) in 2001. The increase in activity during 2003 reflects the Companys increase in spending for development drilling in response to higher commodity prices in 2003. The decrease in activity during 2002 reflects the Companys reduced spending for development drilling in response to lower commodity prices in late 2001 and early 2002.
40
Drilling Program Activity
Gas | Oil | Dry | Total | ||||||||||||||
2003 Exploratory
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
87 | 22 | 38 | 147 | |||||||||||||
Net
|
71.0 | 18.3 | 27.3 | 116.6 | |||||||||||||
2003 Development
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
620 | 277 | 25 | 922 | |||||||||||||
Net
|
454.3 | 189.0 | 21.2 | 664.5 | |||||||||||||
2002 Exploratory
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
58 | 24 | 32 | 114 | |||||||||||||
Net
|
45.2 | 19.9 | 25.3 | 90.4 | |||||||||||||
2002 Development
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross
|
628 | 193 | 14 | 835 | |||||||||||||
Net
|
444.2 | 147.6 | 10.7 | 602.5 |
Gross: total wells in which there was participation.
Acquisitions and Divestitures The Companys strategy includes an asset acquisition and divestiture program. In 2003, Anadarko acquired approximately 54 MMBOE of proved reserves, located primarily in the United States. In 2002, Anadarko acquired approximately 87 MMBOE of proved reserves, including 74 MMBOE located in the United States primarily from the Howell acquisition (64 MMBOE) and 13 MMBOE located in Qatar. In 2001, the Company acquired approximately 157 MMBOE of proved reserves, located in: Canada, primarily from the Berkley acquisition (99 MMBOE); Qatar and Oman from the Gulfstream Resources Canada Limited acquisition (57 MMBOE); and the United States (1 MMBOE). Excluding corporate acquisitions, during 2001-2003, Anadarko acquired through purchases and trades 78 MMBOE of proved reserves for $326 million. During the same time period, the Company sold properties, either as a strategic exit from a certain area or asset rationalization in existing core areas, of 113 MMBOE with proceeds totaling $516 million. In 2004, the Company will continue to consider dispositions of certain producing properties in non-core areas.
Marketing Strategies
Overview The Companys sales of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs are generally made at the market prices of those products at the time of sale. Therefore, even though the Company sells significant volumes to major purchasers, the Company believes other purchasers would be willing to buy the Companys natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs at comparable market prices. The Companys marketing department actively manages sales of its oil and gas. The Company markets its production to customers at competitive prices, maximizing realized prices while managing credit exposure. The market knowledge gained through the marketing effort is valuable to the corporate decision making process.
Natural Gas Natural gas continues to supply a significant portion of North Americas energy needs and the Company believes the importance of natural gas in meeting this energy need will continue. The tightening of the natural gas supply and demand fundamentals has resulted in extremely volatile natural gas prices, which is expected to continue.
41
Crude Oil, Condensate and NGLs Anadarkos crude oil, condensate and NGLs revenues are derived from production in the U.S., Canada, Algeria and other international areas. Most of the Companys U.S. crude oil and NGLs production is sold under 30-day evergreen contracts with prices based on marketing indices and adjusted for location, quality and transportation. Most of the Companys Canadian oil production is sold on a term basis of one year or greater. Oil from Algeria and other international areas is sold by tanker as Saharan Blend to customers primarily in the Mediterranean area. Saharan Blend is a high quality crude that provides refiners with large quantities of premium products like high quality jet and diesel fuel. The Company also purchases and sells third-party produced crude oil, condensate and NGLs in the Companys domestic and international market areas. Included in this strategy is the use of various derivative instruments.
Gas Gathering Systems and Processing Anadarkos investment in gas gathering operations allows the Company to better manage its gas production, improve ultimate recovery of reserves, enhance the value of gas production and expand marketing opportunities. The Company has invested about $175 million to build or acquire gas gathering systems over the last five years. The vast majority of the gas flowing through these systems is from Anadarko operated wells.
42
Capital Resources and Liquidity
General Anadarkos cash flow from operating activities in 2003 was $3.0 billion compared to $2.2 billion in 2002 and $3.3 billion in 2001. The increase in 2003 cash flow is attributed primarily to the significant increase in commodity prices. The decrease in 2002 cash flow compared to 2001 is attributed to significantly lower natural gas prices. Fluctuations in commodity prices have been the primary reason for the Companys short-term changes in cash flow from operating activities. Sales volume changes can also impact cash flow in the short-term, but have not been as volatile as commodity prices in the past. Anadarko holds derivative instruments to help manage commodity price risk. Anadarkos long-term cash flow from operating activities is dependent on commodity prices, reserve replacement and the level of costs and expenses required for continued operations. The Companys goals include continuing to find high-margin oil and gas reserves at competitive prices, managing commodity price risk and keeping operating costs at efficient levels.
Debt At year-end 2003, Anadarkos total debt was $5.1 billion compared to total debt of $5.5 billion at year-end 2002, a decrease of about $400 million. This compares to $5.1 billion at year-end 2001. The decrease in debt during 2003 was related primarily to repaying debt that was incurred as a result of the Howell acquisition in late 2002 and repaying Notes that matured in 2003.
43
Capital Expenditures The Company funded its capital investment programs in 2003, 2002 and 2001 primarily through cash flow, plus increases in long-term debt and proceeds from property sales. The following table shows the Companys capital expenditures by category.
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Development
|
$ | 1,566 | $ | 1,079 | $ | 1,641 | ||||||
Exploration
|
518 | 631 | 846 | |||||||||
Acquisitions of oil and gas properties
|
327 | 249 | 198 | |||||||||
Gathering and other
|
73 | 78 | 244 | |||||||||
Capitalized interest and internal costs related
to exploration and development costs
|
308 | 351 | 387 | |||||||||
Total *
|
$ | 2,792 | $ | 2,388 | $ | 3,316 | ||||||
* | Excludes corporate acquisitions. Excludes asset retirement costs and includes actual asset retirement expenditures, which is consistent with prior years. |
Anadarkos total capital spending in 2003 was $2.8 billion, a 17% increase compared to 2002. The increase from 2002 represents a $487 million increase in development spending and a $30 million increase in other spending, partially offset by a $113 million decrease in exploration spending. The increase in development spending and the decrease in exploration spending reflect the Companys decision to direct capital to the areas that have shown the best performance and rate of return, primarily the Lower 48 states, during periods of higher prices.
Dividends In 2003, Anadarko paid $109 million in dividends to its common stockholders (10 cents per share in the first, second and third quarters and 14 cents per share in the fourth quarter). In 2002, Anadarko paid $80 million in dividends to its common stockholders (7.5 cents per share in the first, second and third quarters and 10 cents per share in the fourth quarter). The dividend amount in 2001 was $57 million (5 cents per share in the first, second and third quarters and 7.5 cents per share in the fourth quarter). Anadarko has paid a dividend to its common stockholders continuously since becoming an independent company in 1986.
Outlook The Companys 2004 capital expenditure budget has been set between $2.6 billion and $2.9 billion. Anadarko has allocated $2.3 billion to $2.6 billion for worldwide exploration and development. Approximately 80% will be designated for development and about 20% for exploration. The primary focus of the 2004 budget is to direct capital to the areas that have shown the best performance and rate of return. Anadarko made a number of significant discoveries in 2003 and a top priority in 2004 will be to delineate and develop those discoveries. In addition, the Company plans to carry out a focused exploration program in North America, North Africa and the Middle East. Anadarkos overall plan includes about $300 million for capitalized interest and overhead. In conjunction with the cost reduction plan, the Company evaluated the allocation of capital resources to international exploration for 2004. While Management sees an important place for international projects within its portfolio, Anadarko has narrowed the list of international projects in order to better focus its efforts. As a result, the Company expects to work toward divesting its non-core assets in Egypt, Australia and Oman during 2004.
44
Obligations and Commitments
Following is a summary of the Companys future payments on obligations as of December 31, 2003:
Obligations by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||
2-3 | 4-5 | Later | ||||||||||||||||||
1 Year | Years | Years | Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total debt*
|
$ | | $ | 462 | $ | 1,127 | $ | 3,613 | $ | 5,202 | ||||||||||
Operating leases
|
57 | 120 | 118 | 103 | 398 | |||||||||||||||
Transportation and storage
|
41 | 37 | 37 | 108 | 223 | |||||||||||||||
Oil and gas activities
|
| 87 | | | 87 |
* | Holders of the ZYP-CODES due 2021 may put the remaining $30 million principal amount of the ZYP-CODES to the Company in 2004. This debt instrument has been reflected in the table above. |
Operating Leases During 2003, the Companys two corporate office buildings located in The Woodlands, Texas, were acquired by a wholly-owned subsidiary of a major financial institution from the special purpose entities that had leased the buildings to the Company. The original leases were amended and restated, and, other than the extension of the period of the lease, the terms of the replacement lease between the Company and the real estate development company were essentially unchanged. The total amount funded under the new lease was approximately $214 million. The table above includes lease payment obligations related to this lease under operating leases.
45
Oil and Gas Activities As is common in the oil and gas industry, Anadarko has various contractual commitments pertaining to exploration, development and production activities. The Company has work related commitments for, among other things, drilling wells, obtaining and processing seismic and fulfilling rig commitments. The above table includes drilling and work related commitments of $87 million, comprised of $47 million in Canada, $18 million in Algeria and $22 million in other international locations, that are not included in the 2004 budget.
Marketing and Trading Contracts The following tables provide additional information regarding the Companys marketing and trading portfolio of physical and derivative contracts and the firm transportation keep-whole agreement and related derivatives as of December 31, 2003. The Company records income or loss on these activities using the mark-to-market accounting method. See Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates for an explanation of how the fair value for derivatives are calculated.
Firm | ||||||||||||
Marketing | Transportation | |||||||||||
and Trading | Keep-whole | Total | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of
December 31, 2002 assets (liabilities)
|
$ | (5 | ) | $ | (73 | ) | $ | (78 | ) | |||
Contracts realized or otherwise settled during
2003
|
(2 | ) | (12 | ) | (14 | ) | ||||||
Fair value of new contracts when entered into
during 2003
|
2 | | 2 | |||||||||
Other changes in fair value
|
11 | 9 | 20 | |||||||||
Fair value of contracts outstanding as of
December 31, 2003 assets (liabilities)
|
$ | 6 | $ | (76 | ) | $ | (70 | ) | ||||
Fair Value of Contracts as of December 31, 2003 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Maturity | Maturity | ||||||||||||||||||||
less than | Maturity | Maturity | in excess | ||||||||||||||||||
Assets (Liabilities) | 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 4-5 Years | of 5 Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Marketing and Trading
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prices actively quoted
|
$ | 3 | $ | 2 | $ | 1 | $ | | $ | 6 | |||||||||||
Prices based on models and other valuation methods
|
| | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Firm Transportation Keep-whole
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prices actively quoted
|
$ | (27 | ) | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | (27 | ) | |||||||||
Prices based on models and other valuation methods
|
| (32 | ) | (16 | ) | (1 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||||||||||
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Prices actively quoted
|
$ | (24 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | 1 | $ | | $ | (21 | ) | |||||||||
Prices based on models and other valuation methods
|
| (32 | ) | (16 | ) | (1 | ) | (49 | ) |
Other In 2003, the Company made contributions of $61 million to its funded pension plans, $5 million to its unfunded pension plans and $9 million to its unfunded other postretirement benefit plans. Contributions to the funded plans increase the plan assets while contributions to unfunded plans are made to fund current period benefit payments. In 2004, the Company expects to contribute between $73 million and $78 million to its funded pension plans, $24 million to its unfunded pension plans and $9 million to its unfunded other postretirement benefit plans. Future contributions to funded pension plans will be affected by actuarial assumptions, market performance and individual
46
For additional information on contracts, obligations and arrangements the Company enters into from time to time see Note 3 Asset Retirement Obligations, Note 8 Debt, Note 9 Financial Instruments, Note 20 Pension Plans, Other Postretirement Benefits and Employee Savings Plans and Note 21 Contingencies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Financial Statements and Use of Estimates In preparing financial statements, Management makes informed judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, Management reviews its estimates, including those related to litigation, environmental liabilities, income taxes and determination of proved reserves. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from these estimates.
Properties and Equipment The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for exploration and development activities as defined by the SEC. Under this method of accounting, the costs of unsuccessful, as well as successful, exploration and development activities are capitalized as properties and equipment. This includes any internal costs that are directly related to exploration and development activities but does not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Effective with the adoption of SFAS No. 143 in 2003, the carrying amount of oil and gas properties also includes estimated asset retirement costs recorded based on the fair value of the asset retirement obligation when incurred. Gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of oil and gas properties is not recognized, unless the gain or loss would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and natural gas attributable to a country. The application of the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties generally results in higher capitalized costs and higher DD&A rates compared to the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas properties.
Proved Reserves Proved oil and gas reserves, as defined by SEC Regulation S-X Rule 4-10(a) (2i), (2ii), (2iii), (3) and (4), are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas, and NGLs that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions, i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Prices include consideration of changes in existing prices provided only by contractual arrangements, but not on escalations based upon future conditions.
47
Costs Excluded Oil and gas properties include costs that are excluded from capitalized costs being amortized. These amounts represent investments in unproved properties and major development projects. Anadarko excludes these costs on a country-by-country basis until proved reserves are found or until it is determined that the costs are impaired. All costs excluded are reviewed at least quarterly to determine if impairment has occurred. The amount of any impairment is transferred to the capitalized costs being amortized (the DD&A pool) or a charge is made against earnings for those international operations where a reserve base has not yet been established. Impairments transferred to the DD&A pool increase the DD&A rate for that country. For international operations where a reserve base has not yet been established, an impairment requiring a charge to earnings may be indicated through evaluation of drilling results, relinquishing drilling rights or other information. Costs excluded for oil and gas properties are generally classified and evaluated as significant or individually insignificant properties.
Capitalized Interest SFAS No. 34, Capitalization of Interest Cost, provides standards for the capitalization of interest cost as part of the historical cost of acquiring assets. Under FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 33 Applying FASB Statement No. 34 to Oil and Gas Producing Operations Accounted for by the Full Cost Method, costs of investments in unproved properties and major development projects, on which DD&A expense is not currently taken and on which exploration or development activities are in progress, qualify for capitalization of interest. Capitalized interest is calculated by multiplying the Companys weighted-average interest rate on debt by the amount of qualifying costs excluded. Capitalized interest cannot exceed gross interest expense. As costs excluded are transferred to the DD&A pool, the associated capitalized interest is also transferred to the DD&A pool.
Ceiling Test Companies that use the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas exploration and development activities are required to perform a ceiling test each quarter. The full cost ceiling test is an impairment test prescribed by SEC Regulation S-X Rule 4-10. The ceiling test is performed on a country-by-country basis. The test determines a limit, or ceiling, on the book value of oil and gas properties. That limit is basically the after tax present value of the future net cash flows from proved crude oil and natural gas reserves, including the effect of cash flow hedges. This ceiling is compared to the net book value of the oil and gas properties reduced by any related net deferred income tax liability and asset retirement obligation. If the net book value reduced by the related deferred income taxes and asset retirement obligation exceeds the ceiling, an impairment or noncash writedown is required. A ceiling test impairment can give Anadarko a significant loss for a particular period; however, future DD&A expense would be reduced.
Derivative Instruments Anadarko holds derivative instruments for its energy marketing and trading business and to manage foreign currency risk and commodity price risk associated with its equity oil and gas production and the firm transportation keep-whole agreement. Anadarko accounts for its derivative instruments under the provisions of SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. Under this statement, all derivatives other than those that meet the normal purchases and sales exception are carried on the balance sheet at fair value.
48
Recent Accounting Developments
The Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) is considering two issues related to the reporting of oil and gas mineral rights. Issue No. 03-O, Whether Mineral Rights Are Tangible or Intangible Assets, is whether or not mineral rights are intangible assets pursuant to SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. Issue No. 03-S, Application of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, to Oil and Gas Companies, is, if oil and gas drilling rights are intangible assets, whether those assets are subject to the classification and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 142.
Regulatory Matters and Additional Factors Affecting Business
Forward Looking Statements The Company has made in this report, and may from time to time otherwise make in other public filings, press releases and discussions with Company management, forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 concerning the Companys operations, economic performance and financial condition. These forward looking statements include information concerning future production and reserves, schedules, plans, timing of development,
49
Commodity Pricing and Demand Crude oil prices continue to be affected by political developments worldwide, pricing decisions and production quotas of OPEC and the volatile trading patterns in the commodity futures markets. In addition, in OPEC countries in which Anadarko has production such as Algeria, Venezuela and Qatar, when the world oil market is weak, the Company may be subject to periods of decreased production due to government mandated cutbacks. Natural gas prices also continue to be highly volatile. In periods of sharply lower commodity prices, the Company may curtail production and capital spending projects, as well as delay or defer drilling wells in certain areas because of lower cash flows. Changes in crude oil and natural gas prices can impact the Companys determination of proved reserves and the Companys calculation of the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to oil and gas reserves. In addition, demand for oil and gas in the U.S. and worldwide may affect the Companys level of production.
Environmental and Safety The Companys oil and gas operations and properties are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to environmental protection from the time oil and gas projects commence until abandonment. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, the amounts and types of substances and materials that may be released into the environment, the issuance of permits in connection with exploration, drilling and production activities, the release of emissions into the atmosphere, the discharge and disposition of generated waste materials, offshore oil and gas operations, the reclamation and abandonment of wells and facility sites and the remediation of contaminated sites. In addition, these laws and regulations may impose substantial liabilities for the Companys failure to comply with them or for any contamination resulting from the Companys operations.
Exploration and Operating Risks The Companys business is subject to all of the operating risks normally associated with the exploration for and production of oil and gas, including blowouts, cratering and fire, any of which could result in damage to, or destruction of, oil and gas wells or formations or production facilities and other property and injury to persons.
50
Development Risks The Company is involved in several large development projects. Key factors that may affect the timing and outcome of such projects include: project approvals by joint venture partners; timely issuance of permits and licenses by governmental agencies; manufacturing and delivery schedules of critical equipment; and commercial arrangements for pipelines and related equipment to transport and market hydrocarbons. In large development projects, these uncertainties are usually resolved, but delays and differences between estimated and actual timing of critical events are commonplace and may, therefore, affect the forward looking statements related to large development projects.
Domestic Governmental Risks The domestic operations of the Company have been, and at times in the future may be, affected by political developments and by federal, state and local laws and regulations such as restrictions on production, changes in taxes, royalties and other amounts payable to governments or governmental agencies, price or gathering rate controls and environmental protection regulations.
Foreign Operations Risk The Companys operations in areas outside the U.S. are subject to various risks inherent in foreign operations. These risks may include, among other things, loss of revenue, property and equipment as a result of hazards such as expropriation, war, insurrection and other political risks, increases in taxes and governmental royalties, renegotiation of contracts with governmental entities, changes in laws and policies governing operations of foreign-based companies, currency restrictions and exchange rate fluctuations and other uncertainties arising out of foreign government sovereignty over the Companys international operations. The Companys international operations may also be adversely affected by laws and policies of the United States affecting foreign trade and taxation. To date, the Companys international operations have not been materially affected by these risks.
Competition The oil and gas business is highly competitive in the search for and acquisition of reserves and in the gathering and marketing of oil and gas production. The Companys competitors include major oil and gas companies, independent oil and gas companies, individual producers, gas marketers and major pipeline companies, as well as participants in other industries supplying energy and fuel to industrial, commercial and individual consumers. Some of the Companys competitors may have greater and more diverse resources upon which to draw than does Anadarko. If the Company is not successful in its competition for oil and gas reserves or in its marketing of production, the Companys financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.
Other Regulatory agencies in certain states and countries have authority to issue permits for seismic exploration and the drilling of wells, regulate well spacing, prevent the waste of oil and gas resources through proration and regulate environmental matters.
Legal Proceedings
General The Company is a defendant in a number of lawsuits and is involved in governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including, but not limited to, royalty claims, contract claims and environmental claims. The Company has also been named as a defendant in various personal injury claims, including numerous claims by employees of third-party contractors alleging exposure to asbestos, silica and benzene while working at a refinery in Corpus Christi, Texas, which a company Anadarko acquired by merger in 2000 sold in segments in 1987 and 1989. While the ultimate outcome and impact on the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, Management believes that the resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Company, although results of operations and cash flow could be significantly impacted in the reporting periods in which such matters are resolved.
51
Item 7a. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Derivative Instruments Anadarkos derivative instruments currently are comprised of futures, swaps and options contracts. The volume of derivative instruments utilized by the Company to hedge its market price risk and in its energy trading operation can vary during the year within the boundaries of its established risk management policy guidelines. For information regarding the Companys accounting policies related to derivatives and additional information related to the Companys derivative instruments, see Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 9 Financial Instruments of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Derivative Instruments Held for Non-Trading Purposes The Company had equity production hedges of 224 Bcf of natural gas and 26 MMBbls of crude oil as of December 31, 2003 (excluding physical delivery fixed price contracts). As of December 31, 2003, the Company had a net unrealized loss of $242 million before taxes on these commodity derivative instruments. Utilizing the actual derivative contractual volumes, a 10% increase in commodity prices would result in an additional loss on these commodity derivative instruments of approximately $143 million. However, this loss would be substantially offset by a gain in the value of that portion of the Companys equity production that is hedged.
Derivative Instruments Held for Trading Purposes As of December 31, 2003, the Company had a net unrealized gain of $37 million (gains of $70 million and losses of $33 million) on commodity derivative financial instruments entered into for trading purposes and a net unrealized loss of $30 million (gains of $12 million and losses of $42 million) on derivative physical delivery contracts entered into for trading purposes. Utilizing the actual derivative contractual volumes and assuming a 10% decrease in underlying commodity prices, the potential additional loss on the derivative instruments would be approximately $3 million.
Firm Transportation Keep-Whole Agreement A company Anadarko acquired in 2000 was a party to several long-term firm gas transportation agreements that supported its gas marketing program within its GPM business segment, which was sold in 1999 to Duke. As part of the GPM disposition, Anadarko pays Duke if transportation market values fall below the fixed contract transportation rates, while Duke pays Anadarko if the transportation market values exceed the contract transportation rates (keep-whole agreement). This keep-whole agreement will be in effect until the earlier of each contracts expiration date or February 2009. The Company may periodically use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure under the keep-whole agreement to potential decreases in future transportation market values. Due to decreased liquidity, the use of derivative instruments to manage this risk is generally limited to the forward twelve months. As of December 31, 2003, accounts payable included $27 million and other long-term liabilities included $49 million related to this agreement. As of December 31, 2002, accounts payable included $5 million and other long-term liabilities included $68 million related to this agreement. A 10% unfavorable change in prices on the short-term portion of the keep-whole agreement would result in an additional loss of $8 million. The future gain or loss from this agreement cannot be accurately predicted. For additional information related to the keep-whole agreement, see Note 9 Financial Instruments of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
Interest Rate Risk Anadarko is also exposed to risk resulting from changes in interest rates as a result of the Companys floating rate debt. The Company believes the potential effect that reasonably possible near term changes in interest rates may have on the fair value of the Companys various debt instruments is not material.
Foreign Currency Risk The Companys Canadian subsidiaries use the Canadian dollar as their functional currency. The Companys other international subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. To the extent that business transactions in these countries are not denominated in the respective countrys functional currency, the Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk.
52
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Page | ||||
Report of Management
|
54 | |||
Independent Auditors Report
|
55 | |||
Statements of Income, Three Years Ended
December 31, 2003
|
56 | |||
Balance Sheets, December 31, 2003 and 2002
|
57 | |||
Statements of Stockholders Equity, Three
Years Ended December 31, 2003
|
58 | |||
Statements of Comprehensive Income, Three Years
Ended December 31, 2003
|
59 | |||
Statements of Cash Flows, Three Years Ended
December 31, 2003
|
60 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
61 | |||
Supplemental Information on Oil and Gas
Exploration and Production Activities
|
97 | |||
Supplemental Quarterly Information
|
113 |
53
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
The Management of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation is responsible for the preparation and integrity of all information contained in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In preparing the financial statements, Management makes informed judgments and estimates.
James T. Hackett President and Chief Executive Officer James R. Larson Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
54
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2003. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
Houston, Texas
55
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions except per share amounts | ||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||
Gas sales
|
$ | 2,851 | $ | 1,828 | $ | 2,952 | ||||||
Oil and condensate sales
|
1,787 | 1,682 | 1,397 | |||||||||
Natural gas liquids sales
|
365 | 222 | 256 | |||||||||
Other sales
|
119 | 113 | 113 | |||||||||
Total
|
5,122 | 3,845 | 4,718 | |||||||||
Costs and Expenses
|
||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
828 | 747 | 769 | |||||||||
Administrative and general
|
352 | 314 | 292 | |||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
1,297 | 1,121 | 1,154 | |||||||||
Other taxes
|
294 | 214 | 247 | |||||||||
Impairments related to oil and gas properties
|
103 | 39 | 2,546 | |||||||||
Restructuring costs
|
40 | | | |||||||||
Amortization of goodwill
|
| | 73 | |||||||||
Total
|
2,914 | 2,435 | 5,081 | |||||||||
Operating Income (Loss)
|
2,208 | 1,410 | (363 | ) | ||||||||
Interest Expense and Other (Income)
Expense
|
||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
253 | 203 | 92 | |||||||||
Other (income) expense
|
(19 | ) | | (65 | ) | |||||||
Total
|
234 | 203 | 27 | |||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
1,974 | 1,207 | (390 | ) | ||||||||
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
|
729 | 376 | (214 | ) | ||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Before Cumulative Effect of
Change in Accounting Principle
|
$ | 1,245 | $ | 831 | $ | (176 | ) | |||||
Preferred Stock Dividends
|
5 | 6 | 7 | |||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common
Stockholders Before
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle |
$ | 1,240 | $ | 825 | $ | (183 | ) | |||||
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting
Principle
|
47 | | (5 | ) | ||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common
Stockholders
|
$ | 1,287 | $ | 825 | $ | (188 | ) | |||||
Per Common Share
|
||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before change in
accounting principle basic
|
$ | 4.97 | $ | 3.32 | $ | (0.73 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) before change in
accounting principle diluted
|
$ | 4.91 | $ | 3.21 | $ | (0.73 | ) | |||||
Change in accounting principle basic
|
$ | 0.19 | $ | | $ | (0.02 | ) | |||||
Change in accounting principle diluted
|
$ | 0.18 | $ | | $ | (0.02 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) basic
|
$ | 5.16 | $ | 3.32 | $ | (0.75 | ) | |||||
Net income (loss) diluted
|
$ | 5.09 | $ | 3.21 | $ | (0.75 | ) | |||||
Dividends
|
$ | 0.44 | $ | 0.325 | $ | 0.225 | ||||||
Average Number of Common Shares
Outstanding Basic
|
250 | 248 | 250 | |||||||||
Average Number of Common Shares
Outstanding Diluted
|
253 | 260 | 250 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
56
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
December 31 | |||||||||
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
millions | |||||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||||
Current Assets
|
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 62 | $ | 34 | |||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance:
|
|||||||||
Customers
|
778 | 673 | |||||||
Others
|
326 | 435 | |||||||
Other current assets
|
158 | 138 | |||||||
Total
|
1,324 | 1,280 | |||||||
Properties and Equipment
|
|||||||||
Original cost (includes unproved properties of
$2,524 and $3,085 as of December 31, 2003 and 2002,
respectively)
|
26,367 | 22,595 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
8,971 | 7,497 | |||||||
Net properties and equipment based on
the full cost method of accounting for oil and gas properties
|
17,396 | 15,098 | |||||||
Other Assets
|
437 | 436 | |||||||
Goodwill
|
1,389 | 1,434 | |||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 20,546 | $ | 18,248 | |||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS
EQUITY
|
|||||||||
Current Liabilities
|
|||||||||
Accounts payable
|
$ | 1,222 | $ | 1,050 | |||||
Accrued expenses
|
493 | 511 | |||||||
Current portion, notes and debentures
|
| 300 | |||||||
Total
|
1,715 | 1,861 | |||||||
Long-term Debt
|
5,058 | 5,171 | |||||||
Other Long-term Liabilities
|
|||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
4,252 | 3,633 | |||||||
Other
|
922 | 611 | |||||||
Total
|
5,174 | 4,244 | |||||||
Stockholders Equity
|
|||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $1.00 per share
|
|||||||||
(2.0 million shares authorized,
0.1 million shares issued as of December 31, 2003 and
2002)
|
89 | 101 | |||||||
Common stock, par value $0.10 per share
|
|||||||||
(450.0 million shares authorized,
258.2 million and 254.6 million shares issued as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively)
|
26 | 25 | |||||||
Paid-in capital
|
5,500 | 5,347 | |||||||
Retained earnings
|
3,199 | 2,021 | |||||||
Treasury stock (3.2 million shares as of
December 31, 2003 and 2002)
|
(166 | ) | (166 | ) | |||||
Deferred compensation and ESOP (1.6 million
and 0.7 million shares as of December 31, 2003 and
2002, respectively)
|
(69 | ) | (63 | ) | |||||
Executives and Directors Benefits Trust, at
market value (2.0 million shares as of December 31,
2003 and 2002)
|
(102 | ) | (95 | ) | |||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|||||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments
|
(120 | ) | (85 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
300 | (37 | ) | ||||||
Minimum pension liability
|
(58 | ) | (76 | ) | |||||
Total
|
122 | (198 | ) | ||||||
Total
|
8,599 | 6,972 | |||||||
Commitments and Contingencies
|
| | |||||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders
Equity
|
$ | 20,546 | $ | 18,248 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
57
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Preferred Stock
|
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
$ | 101 | $ | 103 | $ | 200 | ||||||
Preferred stock repurchased
|
(12 | ) | (2 | ) | (97 | ) | ||||||
Balance at end of year
|
89 | 101 | 103 | |||||||||
Common Stock
|
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
25 | 25 | 25 | |||||||||
Common stock issued
|
1 | | | |||||||||
Balance at end of year
|
26 | 25 | 25 | |||||||||
Paid-in Capital
|
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
5,347 | 5,336 | 5,303 | |||||||||
Common stock and common stock put options issued
|
146 | 30 | 51 | |||||||||
Revaluation to market for Executives and
Directors Benefits Trust
|
7 | (19 | ) | (31 | ) | |||||||
Preferred stock repurchased
|
| | 13 | |||||||||
Balance at end of year
|
5,500 | 5,347 | 5,336 | |||||||||
Retained Earnings
|
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
2,021 | 1,276 | 1,521 | |||||||||
Net income (loss)
|
1,292 | 831 | (181 | ) | ||||||||
Dividends paid preferred
|
(5 | ) | (6 | ) | (7 | ) | ||||||
Dividends paid common
|
(109 | ) | (80 | ) | (57 | ) | ||||||
Balance at end of year
|
3,199 | 2,021 | 1,276 | |||||||||
Treasury Stock
|
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
(166 | ) | (116 | ) | | |||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
| (50 | ) | (116 | ) | |||||||
Balance at end of year
|
(166 | ) | (166 | ) | (116 | ) | ||||||
Deferred Compensation and ESOP
|
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
(63 | ) | (96 | ) | (121 | ) | ||||||
Issuance of restricted stock
|
(46 | ) | (7 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of restricted stock and release of
ESOP shares
|
40 | 40 | 40 | |||||||||
Balance at end of year
|
(69 | ) | (63 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||
Executives and Directors Benefits
Trust
|
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
(95 | ) | (114 | ) | (145 | ) | ||||||
Revaluation to market
|
(7 | ) | 19 | 31 | ||||||||
Balance at end of year
|
(102 | ) | (95 | ) | (114 | ) | ||||||
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
(Loss)
|
||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
(198 | ) | (49 | ) | 3 | |||||||
Unrealized loss on derivative instruments
|
(35 | ) | (85 | ) | | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
337 | 9 | (49 | ) | ||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustments
|
18 | (73 | ) | (3 | ) | |||||||
Balance at end of year
|
122 | (198 | ) | (49 | ) | |||||||
Total Stockholders Equity
|
$ | 8,599 | $ | 6,972 | $ | 6,365 | ||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
58
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Years Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common
Stockholders
|
$ | 1,287 | $ | 825 | $ | (188 | ) | ||||||
Add: Preferred Stock Dividends
|
5 | 6 | 7 | ||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common
Stockholders Before Preferred Stock Dividends
|
1,292 | 831 | (181 | ) | |||||||||
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of
Taxes
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments:
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized gain (loss) during the
period1
|
(154 | ) | (100 | ) | 32 | ||||||||
Reclassification adjustment for (gain) loss
included in net income2
|
119 | 15 | (31 | ) | |||||||||
Cumulative effect of accounting change3
|
| | (5 | ) | |||||||||
Reclassification of cumulative effect of
accounting change included in net income4
|
| | 4 | ||||||||||
Total unrealized loss on derivative instruments
|
(35 | ) | (85 | ) | | ||||||||
Foreign currency translation
adjustments5
|
337 | 9 | (49 | ) | |||||||||
Minimum pension liability adjustments6
|
18 | (73 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
320 | (149 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
$ | 1,612 | $ | 682 | $ | (233 | ) | ||||||
1net of income
tax benefit (expense) of:
|
$ | 91 | $ | 58 | $ | (19 | ) | |||||
2net of income
tax benefit (expense) of:
|
(67 | ) | (9 | ) | 18 | |||||||
3net of income
tax benefit of:
|
| | 3 | |||||||||
4net of income
tax expense of:
|
| | (2 | ) | ||||||||
5net of income
tax expense of:
|
(59 | ) | | | ||||||||
6net of income
tax benefit (expense) of:
|
(11 | ) | 42 | 1 |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
59
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Years Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
|
|||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before cumulative effect of
change in
accounting principle |
$ | 1,245 | $ | 831 | $ | (176 | ) | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) before
cumulative effect of change in accounting principle to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
1,297 | 1,121 | 1,154 | ||||||||||
Amortization of goodwill
|
| | 73 | ||||||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
505 | 214 | (319 | ) | |||||||||
Impairments related to oil and gas properties
|
103 | 39 | 2,546 | ||||||||||
Other noncash items
|
14 | 7 | 151 | ||||||||||
3,164 | 2,212 | 3,429 | |||||||||||
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable
|
46 | (103 | ) | 544 | |||||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and
accrued expenses
|
(68 | ) | 181 | (534 | ) | ||||||||
Other items net
|
(99 | ) | (94 | ) | (118 | ) | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
3,043 | 2,196 | 3,321 | ||||||||||
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
|
|||||||||||||
Additions to properties and equipment
|
(2,772 | ) | (2,388 | ) | (3,316 | ) | |||||||
Acquisition costs, net of cash acquired
|
| (221 | ) | (940 | ) | ||||||||
Sales and retirements of properties and equipment
and other assets
|
138 | 192 | 138 | ||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(2,634 | ) | (2,417 | ) | (4,118 | ) | |||||||
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
|
|||||||||||||
Additions to debt
|
358 | 1,348 | 2,788 | ||||||||||
Retirements of debt
|
(772 | ) | (987 | ) | (1,977 | ) | |||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable, banks
|
49 | (43 | ) | 24 | |||||||||
Dividends paid
|
(114 | ) | (86 | ) | (64 | ) | |||||||
Retirement of preferred stock
|
(12 | ) | (2 | ) | (84 | ) | |||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
| (50 | ) | (116 | ) | ||||||||
Issuance of common stock and common stock put
options
|
100 | 40 | 49 | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities
|
(391 | ) | 220 | 620 | |||||||||
Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on
Cash
|
10 | (2 | ) | 15 | |||||||||
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
28 | (3 | ) | (162 | ) | ||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of
Year
|
34 | 37 | 199 | ||||||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of
Year
|
$ | 62 | $ | 34 | $ | 37 | |||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
60
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
General Anadarko Petroleum Corporation is engaged in the exploration, development, production and marketing of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids (NGLs). The Company also engages in the hard minerals business through non-operated joint ventures and royalty arrangements in several coal, trona (natural soda ash) and industrial mineral mines. The terms Anadarko and Company refer to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and its subsidiaries.
Principles of Consolidation and Use of Estimates The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Anadarko and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated. The Company accounts for investments in affiliated companies (generally 20% to 50% owned) using the equity method of accounting. The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. In preparing financial statements, Management makes informed judgments and estimates that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, Management reviews its estimates, including those related to litigation, environmental liabilities, income taxes and determination of proved reserves. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates and actual results may differ from these estimates.
Changes in Accounting Principles In 2003, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, which requires the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation to be recorded in the period incurred and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. See Note 3.
61
In 2002, the Company discontinued the amortization of goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. See Note 4.
Properties and Equipment The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for exploration and development activities as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Under this method of accounting, the costs of unsuccessful, as well as successful, exploration and development activities are capitalized as properties and equipment. This includes any internal costs that are directly related to exploration and development activities but does not include any costs related to production, general corporate overhead or similar activities. Effective with the adoption of SFAS No. 143 in 2003, the carrying amount of oil and gas properties also includes estimated asset retirement costs recorded based on the fair value of the asset retirement obligation when incurred. Gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of oil and gas properties is not recognized, unless the gain or loss would significantly alter the relationship between capitalized costs and proved reserves of oil and natural gas attributable to a country.
Costs Excluded
Capitalized Interest SFAS No. 34, Capitalization of Interest Cost, provides standards for the capitalization of interest cost as part of the historical cost of acquiring assets. Under FIN No. 33, Applying FASB Statement No. 34 to Oil and Gas Producing Operations Accounted for by the Full Cost Method, costs of investments in unproved properties and major development projects, on which DD&A expense is not currently taken and on which exploration or development activities are in progress, qualify for capitalization of interest. Capitalized interest is calculated by multiplying the Companys weighted-average interest rate on debt by the amount of qualifying costs excluded. Capitalized interest cannot exceed gross interest expense. As costs excluded are transferred to the DD&A pool, the associated capitalized interest is also transferred to the DD&A pool.
Ceiling Test Under the full cost method of accounting, a ceiling test is performed each quarter. The full cost ceiling test is an impairment test prescribed by SEC Regulation S-X Rule 4-10. The ceiling test determines a limit, on a country-by-country basis, on the book value of oil and gas properties. The capitalized costs of proved oil and gas properties, net of accumulated DD&A, asset retirement obligations and the related deferred income taxes, may not exceed the estimated future net cash flows from proved oil and gas reserves, generally using prices in effect at the end of the period held flat for the life of production and including the effect of derivative contracts that qualify as cash flow hedges, discounted at 10%, net of related tax effects, plus the cost of unevaluated properties and major development
62
projects excluded from the costs being amortized. If capitalized costs exceed this limit, the excess is charged to expense and reflected as additional accumulated DD&A.
Revenues The Company recognizes sales revenues based on the amount of gas, oil, condensate and NGLs sold to purchasers when delivery to the purchaser has occurred and title has transferred. This occurs when production has been delivered to a pipeline or a tanker lifting has occurred. The Company follows the sales method of accounting for production imbalances. If the Companys excess sales of production volumes for a well exceed the estimated remaining recoverable reserves of the well, a liability is recorded. No receivables are recorded for those wells on which the Company has taken less than its ownership share of production.
Derivative Instruments Anadarko holds derivative instruments for its energy marketing and trading business and to manage foreign currency risk and commodity price risk associated with its equity oil and gas production and the firm transportation keep-whole agreement. Anadarko accounts for its derivative instruments under the provisions of SFAS No. 133. Under this statement, all derivatives other than those that meet the normal purchases and sales exception are carried on the balance sheet at fair value.
63
Inventories Materials and supplies and commodity inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or market.
Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the merger with Union Pacific Resources Group Inc., subsequently renamed Anadarko Holding Company (Anadarko Holding), and the acquisition of Berkley Petroleum Corp. (Berkley). Effective January 2002, the Company assesses the carrying amount of goodwill by testing the goodwill for impairment. The impairment test requires allocating goodwill and all other assets and liabilities to reporting units. The fair value of each reporting unit is determined and compared to the book value of the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the book value, including goodwill, then the goodwill is written down to the implied fair value of the goodwill through a charge to expense. Goodwill is no longer amortized effective January 2002.
Legal Contingencies The Company is subject to legal proceedings, claims and liabilities which arise in the ordinary course of its business. The Company accrues for losses associated with legal claims when such losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. These accruals are adjusted as further information develops or circumstances change. See Note 21.
Environmental Contingencies The Company accrues for losses associated with environmental remediation obligations when such losses are probable and can be reasonably estimated. Accruals for estimated losses from environmental remediation obligations generally are recognized no later than the time of the completion of the remedial feasibility study. These accruals are adjusted as further information develops or circumstances change. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are not discounted to their present value. Recoveries of environmental remediation costs from other parties are recorded as assets when their receipt is deemed probable. See Note 21.
Income Taxes The Company files various United States federal, state and foreign income tax returns. Deferred federal, state and foreign income taxes are provided on all significant temporary differences, except for those essentially permanent in duration, between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.
Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Stock-Based Compensation Effective January 2003, the Company accounts for stock-based compensation under the fair value method. Under the fair value method, the Company records compensation expense over the vesting period for the fair value of stock options estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Prior to 2003, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation under the intrinsic value method. Under the intrinsic value method, the Company recorded no compensation expense for stock options granted to employees or directors when the exercise price of options granted was equal to or above the fair market value of Anadarkos common stock on the date of grant. See Notes 2 and 11.
Earnings Per Share The Companys basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) amounts have been computed based on the average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS amounts include the effect of the Companys outstanding stock options and performance-based stock awards under the treasury stock method and outstanding put options under the reverse treasury stock method, if including such equity instruments is dilutive. Diluted EPS amounts also include the net effect of the Companys convertible debentures and Zero Yield Puttable
64
Contingent Debt Securities (ZYP-CODES) assuming the conversions occurred at the beginning of the year or the date of issuance, if including such potential common shares is dilutive. See Note 11.
Recent Accounting Developments The EITF is considering two issues related to the reporting of oil and gas mineral rights. Issue No. 03-O, Whether Mineral Rights Are Tangible or Intangible Assets, is whether or not mineral rights are intangible assets pursuant to SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. Issue No. 03-S, Application of SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, to Oil and Gas Companies, is, if oil and gas drilling rights are intangible assets, whether those assets are subject to the classification and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 142.
2. Stock-Based Compensation
In 2003, the Company voluntarily changed to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, for all grants and grant modifications after January 2003 using the prospective method described in SFAS No. 148. For options granted prior to 2003, Anadarko applies Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, whereby no compensation expense is recognized for stock options granted with an exercise price equal to the market value of Anadarko common stock on the date of grant.
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions except per share amounts | ||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common
stockholders, as reported
|
$ | 1,287 | $ | 825 | $ | (188 | ) | |||||
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense
included in net income, after taxes
|
12 | 9 | 10 | |||||||||
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation
expense determined under the fair value method,
after taxes
|
(30 | ) | (32 | ) | (52 | ) | ||||||
Pro forma net income (loss) available to common
stockholders
|
$ | 1,269 | $ | 802 | $ | (230 | ) | |||||
Basic EPS - as reported
|
$ | 5.16 | $ | 3.32 | $ | (0.75 | ) | |||||
Basic EPS - pro forma
|
$ | 5.09 | $ | 3.23 | $ | (0.92 | ) | |||||
Diluted EPS - as reported
|
$ | 5.09 | $ | 3.21 | $ | (0.75 | ) | |||||
Diluted EPS - pro forma
|
$ | 5.02 | $ | 3.13 | $ | (0.92 | ) |
65
The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
Expected option life years
|
5.3 | 5.3 | 4.1 | |||||||||
Risk-free interest rate
|
3.3 | % | 3.7 | % | 4.5 | % | ||||||
Dividend yield
|
0.6 | % | 0.5 | % | 0.5 | % | ||||||
Volatility
|
40.4 | % | 41.7 | % | 43.8 | % |
3. Asset Retirement Obligations
The majority of Anadarkos asset retirement obligations relate to the plugging and abandonment of oil and gas properties. In 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 143, which requires the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation to be recorded in the period incurred and a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. The related cumulative adjustment to net income was an increase of $74 million before income taxes or $47 million after income taxes, or $0.18 per share (diluted). Additionally, the Company recorded an asset retirement obligation liability of $278 million and an increase to net properties and equipment and other assets of $352 million. The Company did not recalculate historical quarterly full cost ceiling test calculations in determining the cumulative adjustment to net income. The application of SFAS No. 143 did not have a material impact on the Companys DD&A expense, net income or EPS in 2003. There was no impact on the Companys cash flow as a result of adopting SFAS No. 143.
millions | ||||
Carrying amount of asset retirement obligations
as of January 1, 2003
|
$ | 278 | ||
Liabilities incurred
|
149 | |||
Liabilities settled
|
(23 | ) | ||
Accretion expense
|
20 | |||
Revisions in estimated liabilities
|
37 | |||
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
16 | |||
Carrying amount of asset retirement obligations
as of December 31, 2003
|
$ | 477 | ||
Liabilities incurred during 2003 relate primarily to offshore property acquisitions, exploration and development.
66
The following table shows the effect of the implementation on the Companys net income and EPS as if SFAS No. 143 had been in effect in prior periods.
Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | |||||||||||||
millions except per share amounts | ||||||||||||||||
Actual
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
$ | 825 | $ | (188 | ) | $ | 796 | $ | 32 | |||||||
Basic EPS
|
$ | 3.32 | $ | (0.75 | ) | $ | 4.32 | $ | 0.25 | |||||||
Diluted EPS
|
$ | 3.21 | $ | (0.75 | ) | $ | 4.16 | $ | 0.25 | |||||||
Pro forma amounts assuming
SFAS No. 143 was applied retroactively
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
$ | 826 | $ | (183 | ) | $ | 795 | $ | 33 | |||||||
Basic EPS
|
$ | 3.32 | $ | (0.73 | ) | $ | 4.32 | $ | 0.26 | |||||||
Diluted EPS
|
$ | 3.21 | $ | (0.73 | ) | $ | 4.15 | $ | 0.26 | |||||||
Carrying amount of asset retirement
obligations
|
||||||||||||||||
Beginning of year
|
$ | 251 | $ | 208 | $ | 48 | $ | 44 | ||||||||
End of year
|
$ | 278 | $ | 251 | $ | 208 | $ | 48 |
4. Goodwill
SFAS No. 142 required discontinuing amortization of goodwill after 2001 and requires that goodwill be tested for impairment. The impairment test requires allocating goodwill and all other assets and liabilities to business levels referred to as reporting units. The fair value of each reporting unit that has goodwill is determined and compared to the book value of the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the book value (including goodwill) then a second test is performed to determine the amount of the impairment.
67
The following table shows the effect of the elimination of amortization of goodwill on the Companys net income and net income per share as if SFAS No. 142 had been in effect in prior periods. Prior to 2000, the Company had no goodwill or goodwill amortization recorded.
2001 | 2000 | |||||||
millions except per share amounts | ||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
|
$ | (188 | ) | $ | 796 | |||
Add: Goodwill amortization
|
73 | 31 | ||||||
Adjusted net income (loss)
|
$ | (115 | ) | $ | 827 | |||
EPS basic
|
$ | (0.75 | ) | $ | 4.32 | |||
Goodwill amortization per share basic
|
0.29 | 0.17 | ||||||
Adjusted EPS basic
|
$ | (0.46 | ) | $ | 4.49 | |||
EPS diluted
|
$ | (0.75 | ) | $ | 4.16 | |||
Goodwill amortization per share
diluted
|
0.29 | 0.16 | ||||||
Adjusted EPS diluted
|
$ | (0.46 | ) | $ | 4.32 | |||
5. Acquisitions
In December 2002, the Company acquired Howell Corporation (Howell). The common stockholders of Howell received $20.75 per share and holders of Howells $3.50 convertible preferred stock received $76.15 per share. The total value of the acquisition was $258 million, including the assumption of $53 million of debt.
6. Inventories
The major classes of inventories, which are included in other current assets, are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
millions | ||||||||
Materials and supplies
|
$ | 77 | $ | 75 | ||||
Natural gas
|
29 | 16 | ||||||
Crude oil and NGLs
|
19 | 15 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 125 | $ | 106 | ||||
68
7. Properties and Equipment
A summary of the original cost of properties and equipment by classification follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
millions | ||||||||
Oil and gas properties
|
$ | 24,272 | $ | 20,467 | ||||
Mineral properties
|
1,211 | 1,211 | ||||||
Gathering facilities
|
341 | 310 | ||||||
General properties
|
543 | 607 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 26,367 | $ | 22,595 | ||||
Oil and gas properties include costs of $2.5 billion and $3.1 billion at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, which were excluded from capitalized costs being amortized. These amounts represent costs associated with unproved properties and major development projects. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Companys investment in countries where proved reserves have not been established was $76 million and $63 million, respectively.
69
8. Debt
A summary of debt follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||||
Principal | Carrying Value | Principal | Carrying Value | |||||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||||||
Notes Payable, Banks*
|
$ | | $ | | $ | 44 | $ | 44 | ||||||||
Commercial Paper*
|
| | 181 | 181 | ||||||||||||
Long-term Portion of Capital Lease
|
1 | 1 | 7 | 7 | ||||||||||||
6 3/4% Notes due 2003
|
| | 73 | 73 | ||||||||||||
5 7/8% Notes due 2003
|
| | 83 | 83 | ||||||||||||
6.5% Notes due 2005
|
170 | 168 | 170 | 166 | ||||||||||||
7.375% Debentures due 2006
|
88 | 88 | 88 | 87 | ||||||||||||
7% Notes due 2006
|
174 | 171 | 174 | 171 | ||||||||||||
5 3/8% Notes due 2007
|
650 | 648 | 650 | 647 | ||||||||||||
3.25% Notes due 2008
|
350 | 349 | | | ||||||||||||
6.75% Notes due 2008
|
116 | 111 | 116 | 111 | ||||||||||||
7.8% Debentures due 2008
|
11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | ||||||||||||
7.3% Notes due 2009
|
85 | 83 | 85 | 83 | ||||||||||||
6 3/4% Notes due 2011
|
950 | 910 | 950 | 912 | ||||||||||||
6 1/8% Notes due 2012
|
400 | 395 | 400 | 395 | ||||||||||||
5% Notes due 2012
|
300 | 298 | 300 | 297 | ||||||||||||
7.05% Debentures due 2018
|
114 | 105 | 114 | 105 | ||||||||||||
Zero Coupon Convertible Debentures due 2020
|
| | 380 | 380 | ||||||||||||
Zero Yield Puttable Contingent Debt Securities
due 2021
|
30 | 30 | 30 | 30 | ||||||||||||
7.5% Debentures due 2026
|
112 | 106 | 112 | 106 | ||||||||||||
7% Debentures due 2027
|
54 | 54 | 54 | 54 | ||||||||||||
6.625% Debentures due 2028
|
17 | 17 | 17 | 17 | ||||||||||||
7.15% Debentures due 2028
|
235 | 213 | 235 | 212 | ||||||||||||
7.20% Debentures due 2029
|
135 | 135 | 135 | 135 | ||||||||||||
7.95% Debentures due 2029
|
117 | 117 | 117 | 117 | ||||||||||||
7 1/2% Notes due 2031
|
900 | 861 | 900 | 862 | ||||||||||||
7.73% Debentures due 2096
|
61 | 61 | 61 | 61 | ||||||||||||
7.5% Debentures due 2096
|
83 | 77 | 83 | 75 | ||||||||||||
7 1/4% Debentures due 2096
|
49 | 49 | 49 | 49 | ||||||||||||
Total debt
|
$ | 5,202 | 5,058 | $ | 5,619 | 5,471 | ||||||||||
Less current portion
|
| 300 | ||||||||||||||
Total long-term debt
|
$ | 5,058 | $ | 5,171 | ||||||||||||
* | The average rates in effect at December 31, 2002 were 1.57% for Notes Payable, Banks and 1.88% for Commercial Paper. |
The Company recorded debt discounts of $1 million, $11 million and $40 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, as a result of debt issuances, financial restructuring and corporate acquisitions. The unamortized debt discount of $144 million and $148 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively, will be amortized over the terms of the debt issues.
70
In April 2001, Anadarko Finance Company, a wholly-owned finance subsidiary of Anadarko, issued $1.3 billion in notes to qualified institutional buyers under Rule 144A and non-U.S. persons under Regulation S. This issuance was made up of $400 million of 6 3/4% Notes due 2011 and $900 million of 7 1/2% Notes due 2031. In May 2001, Anadarko Finance Company issued an additional $550 million of 6 3/4% Notes due 2011, bringing the 6 3/4% Notes to an aggregate total of $950 million. The notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Anadarko. The net proceeds from the notes were used as part of an exchange of securities for other Anadarko debt. The intercompany debt resulting from these transactions is of a long-term investment nature; therefore, net foreign currency translation gains of $376 million and $19 million and losses of $55 million for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively, were recorded as a component of other comprehensive income.
millions | ||||
2004
|
$ | | ||
2005
|
200 | |||
2006
|
262 | |||
2007
|
650 | |||
2008
|
477 |
71
9. Financial Instruments
The following information provides the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Companys financial instruments:
Carrying | |||||||||
Amount | Fair Value | ||||||||
millions | |||||||||
2003
|
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 62 | $ | 62 | |||||
Total debt
|
5,058 | 5,760 | |||||||
Commodity derivative instruments (including firm
transportation
keep-whole agreement) |
|||||||||
Asset
|
77 | 77 | |||||||
Liability
|
(358 | ) | (358 | ) | |||||
2002
|
|||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 34 | $ | 34 | |||||
Total debt
|
5,471 | 6,252 | |||||||
Commodity derivative instruments (including firm
transportation
keep-whole agreement) |
|||||||||
Asset
|
85 | 85 | |||||||
Liability
|
(288 | ) | (288 | ) | |||||
Foreign currency derivative instruments
|
(8 | ) | (8 | ) |
Cash and Cash Equivalents The carrying amount reported on the balance sheet approximates fair value.
Debt The fair value of debt at December 31, 2003 and 2002 is the value the Company would have to pay to retire the debt, including any premium or discount to the debt holder for the differential between stated interest rate and year-end market rate. The fair values are based on quoted market prices and, where such quotes were not available, on the average rate in effect at year-end.
Commodity Derivative Instruments The Company is exposed to price risk from changing commodity prices. Management believes it is prudent to periodically minimize the variability in cash flows on a portion of its oil and gas production. To meet this objective, the Company enters into various types of commodity derivative financial instruments to manage fluctuations in cash flows resulting from changing commodity prices. The Company also uses fixed price physical delivery sales contracts to accomplish this objective. The types of instruments utilized by the Company include options, futures and swaps.
72
(NYMEX) or the International Petroleum Exchange and have nominal credit risk. Swap, over-the-counter traded option and physical delivery agreements expose the Company to credit risk to the extent the counterparty is unable to meet its settlement commitment. The Company monitors the creditworthiness of each counterparty. In addition, the Company routinely exercises its contractual right to net realized gains against realized losses in settling with its swap and option counterparties.
Oil and Gas Activities At December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company had option contracts, swap contracts and fixed price physical delivery contracts in place to hedge a portion of expected future sales of equity oil and gas production. The fixed price physical delivery contracts are excluded from derivative accounting treatment under the normal sale provision. The derivative financial instruments receive hedge accounting treatment if they meet certain qualifications and mark-to-market accounting is applied to those that do not qualify for hedge accounting. The fair values and the accumulated other comprehensive income balances applicable to the derivative financial instruments (excluding the physical delivery sales contracts) are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
millions | |||||||||
Fair Value Liability
|
|||||||||
Current
|
$ | (232 | ) | $ | (115 | ) | |||
Noncurrent
|
(10 | ) | (39 | ) | |||||
Total
|
$ | (242 | ) | $ | (154 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss before
income taxes
|
$ | (193 | ) | $ | (128 | ) | |||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss after income
taxes
|
$ | (122 | ) | $ | (81 | ) |
The difference between the fair values and the unrealized gain (loss) before income taxes recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income is due to premiums, recognition of unrealized gains and losses on certain derivatives that did not qualify for hedge accounting, hedge ineffectiveness and foreign currency hedges. Approximately $184 million ($116 million after income taxes) of net losses in the accumulated other comprehensive income balance as of December 31, 2003 is expected to be reclassified into gas and oil sales during 2004 as the hedged transactions occur. During 2003, net unrealized losses of $20 million (before income taxes) were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income to gas and oil sales for certain cash flow hedges of expected future years production for which hedge accounting was discontinued since the expected production was no longer probable. These hedges have been redesignated as hedges of other expected future production.
73
Below is a summary of the Companys financial derivative instruments and physical delivery sales contracts through 2005 related to its oil and gas activities (non-trading activities) as of December 31, 2003. The table below shows the hedged volumes per day and the related weighted-average prices for volumes hedged. A substantial portion of these hedges qualify for and receive hedge accounting treatment. There are no significant cash flow hedges beyond 2005.
2004 | 2005 | ||||||||
Natural Gas | |||||||||
Three-Way Collars (thousand MMBtu/d)
|
319 | 19 | |||||||
NYMEX price per MMBtu
|
|||||||||
Floor sold price
|
$ | 2.87 | $ | 2.20 | |||||
Floor purchased price
|
$ | 3.94 | $ | 3.00 | |||||
Ceiling sold price
|
$ | 5.52 | $ | 4.83 | |||||
Two-Way Collars (thousand MMBtu/d)
|
44 | 26 | |||||||
NYMEX price per MMBtu
|
|||||||||
Floor purchased price
|
$ | 4.29 | $ | 3.76 | |||||
Ceiling sold price
|
$ | 6.43 | $ | 5.65 | |||||
Fixed Price (thousand MMBtu/d)
|
259 | 33 | |||||||
NYMEX price per MMBtu
|
$ | 3.86 | $ | 3.46 | |||||
Total (thousand MMBtu/d)
|
622 | 78 | |||||||
Basis Swaps (thousand MMBtu/d)
|
197 | 53 | |||||||
Price per MMBtu
|
$ | (0.13 | ) | $ | (0.22 | ) |
MMBtu million British thermal units
MMBtu/d million British thermal units per day
2004 | 2005 | ||||||||
Crude Oil | |||||||||
Three-Way Collars (MBbls/d)
|
38 | | |||||||
NYMEX price per barrel
|
|||||||||
Floor sold price
|
$ | 20.13 | $ | | |||||
Floor purchased price
|
$ | 24.61 | $ | | |||||
Ceiling sold price
|
$ | 30.00 | $ | | |||||
Two-Way Collars (MBbls/d)
|
3 | 2 | |||||||
NYMEX price per barrel
|
|||||||||
Floor purchased price
|
$ | 22.00 | $ | 22.00 | |||||
Ceiling sold price
|
$ | 26.32 | $ | 26.32 | |||||
Fixed Price (MBbls/d)
|
26 | | |||||||
NYMEX price per barrel
|
$ | 27.22 | $ | | |||||
Total (MBbls/d)
|
67 | 2 |
MBbls/d thousand barrels per day
A two-way collar is a combination of options, a sold call and purchased put. The purchased put establishes a minimum price (floor) and the sold call establishes a maximum price (ceiling) the Company will receive for the volumes under contract. A three-way collar is a combination of options, a sold call, a purchased put and a sold put. The purchased put establishes a minimum price unless the market price falls below the sold put, at which point the minimum price would be NYMEX plus the difference between the purchased put and the sold put strike price. The sold
74
call establishes a maximum price the Company will receive for the volumes under contract. The fixed price hedges consist of swaps and physical delivery contracts and establish a fixed price the Company will receive for the volumes under contract.
Marketing and Trading Activities The fair values of the Companys marketing and trading derivative financial instruments as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
millions | |||||||||
Fair Value Asset (Liability)
|
|||||||||
Current
|
$ | 33 | $ | 24 | |||||
Noncurrent
|
4 | | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 37 | $ | 24 | |||||
Firm Transportation Keep-Whole Agreement A company Anadarko acquired in 2000 was a party to several long-term firm gas transportation agreements that supported its gas marketing program within its gathering, processing and marketing (GPM) business segment, which was sold in 1999 to Duke. Most of these agreements were transferred to Duke in the GPM disposition. One agreement was retained, but is managed and operated by Duke. Anadarko is not responsible for the operations of the contracts and does not utilize the associated transportation assets to transport the Companys natural gas. As part of the GPM disposition, Anadarko pays Duke if transportation market values fall below the fixed contract transportation rates, while Duke pays Anadarko if the transportation market values exceed the contract transportation rates (keep-whole agreement). This keep-whole agreement will be in effect until the earlier of each contracts expiration date or February 2009. The Company may periodically use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure under the Duke keep-whole agreement to potential decreases in future transportation market values. While derivatives are intended to reduce the Companys exposure to declines in the market value of firm transportation, they also limit the potential to benefit from increases in the market value of firm transportation. Due to decreased liquidity, the use of derivative instruments to manage this risk is generally limited to the forward twelve months. Net receipts from Duke for 2003 and 2002 were $12 million and $17 million, respectively. This keep-whole agreement and any associated derivative instruments are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis.
75
Anticipated undiscounted and discounted liabilities for the firm transportation keep-whole agreement at December 31, 2003 are as follows:
Undiscounted | Discounted | |||||||
millions | ||||||||
2004
|
$ | 27 | $ | 27 | ||||
2005
|
20 | 18 | ||||||
2006
|
19 | 15 | ||||||
2007
|
14 | 10 | ||||||
2008
|
9 | 5 | ||||||
2009
|
1 | 1 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 90 | $ | 76 | ||||
As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, the Company had no material volumes of natural gas hedges under derivative financial instruments related to the firm transportation keep-whole agreement.
Foreign Currency Risk Anadarkos Canadian subsidiaries use the Canadian dollar as their functional currency. The Companys other international subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional currency. To the extent that business transactions in these countries are not denominated in the respective countrys functional currency, the Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk. In addition, in these subsidiaries, certain asset and liability balances are denominated in currencies other than the subsidiarys functional currency. These asset and liability balances are remeasured for the preparation of the subsidiarys financial statements using a combination of current and historical exchange rates, with any resulting remeasurement adjustments included in net income during the period.
10. Preferred Stock
In 1998, Anadarko issued $200 million of 5.46% Series B Cumulative Preferred Stock in the form of two million Depositary Shares, each Depositary Share representing 1/10th of a share of the 5.46% Series B Cumulative Preferred Stock. The preferred stock has no stated maturity and is not subject to a sinking fund or mandatory redemption. The shares are not convertible into other securities of the Company.
76
11. Common Stock and Stock Options
Following is a schedule of the changes in the Companys shares of common stock:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Shares of common stock issued
|
||||||||||||
Beginning of year
|
255 | 254 | 253 | |||||||||
Exercise of stock options
|
2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock
|
1 | | | |||||||||
End of year
|
258 | 255 | 254 | |||||||||
Shares of common stock held in
treasury
|
||||||||||||
Beginning of year
|
3 | 2 | | |||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock
|
| 1 | 2 | |||||||||
End of year
|
3 | 3 | 2 | |||||||||
Shares of common stock held for deferred
compensation and unearned employee stock ownership
plans
|
||||||||||||
Beginning of year
|
1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock
|
1 | | | |||||||||
End of year
|
2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||
Shares of common stock held for Executives and
Directors Benefits Trust
|
||||||||||||
Beginning of year
|
2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
End of year
|
2 | 2 | 2 | |||||||||
Shares of common stock outstanding at end of
year
|
251 | 249 | 249 | |||||||||
In the fourth quarter of 2003, dividends of 14 cents per share were paid to holders of common stock. For the first, second and third quarters of 2003 and the fourth quarter of 2002, dividends of 10 cents per share were paid to holders of common stock. For the first, second and third quarters of 2002 and the fourth quarter of 2001, dividends of 7.5 cents per share were paid to holders of common stock. For the first, second and third quarters of 2001, dividends of 5 cents per share were paid to holders of common stock. The Companys credit agreement allows for a maximum capitalization ratio of 60% debt, exclusive of the effect of any noncash writedowns. While there is no specific restriction on paying dividends, under the maximum debt capitalization ratio retained earnings were not restricted as to the payment of dividends at December 31, 2003 and 2002.
77
purchased either in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The repurchase program does not obligate Anadarko to acquire any specific number of shares and may be discontinued at any time. During 2003, the Company acquired treasury stock only as a result of the unsolicited buyback of shares. In 2002, the Company purchased 1 million shares of common stock for $50 million. During 2001, the Company purchased 2.2 million shares of common stock for $116 million.
78
11. Common Stock and Stock Options (Continued)
Unexercised stock options are included in the diluted EPS using the treasury stock method. Information regarding the Companys stock option plans is summarized below:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | Weighted- | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Average | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Exercise | Exercise | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Price | Shares | Price | Shares | Price | |||||||||||||||||||
option shares in millions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares under option at beginning of
year
|
15.3 | $ | 42.68 | 14.6 | $ | 42.49 | 14.4 | $ | 41.28 | |||||||||||||||
Granted
|
1.0 | $ | 43.31 | 1.4 | $ | 41.43 | 1.0 | $ | 58.12 | |||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
(2.1 | ) | $ | 35.82 | (0.6 | ) | $ | 32.53 | (0.6 | ) | $ | 32.93 | ||||||||||||
Surrendered or expired
|
(1.6 | ) | $ | 47.55 | (0.1 | ) | $ | 53.35 | (0.2 | ) | $ | 59.72 | ||||||||||||
Shares under option at end of year
|
12.6 | $ | 43.28 | 15.3 | $ | 42.68 | 14.6 | $ | 42.49 | |||||||||||||||
Options exercisable at December 31
|
9.5 | $ | 42.82 | 11.1 | $ | 40.93 | 7.9 | $ | 36.26 | |||||||||||||||
Shares available for future grant at end of year
|
2.1 | 2.5 | 3.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
during the year
|
$ | 17.83 | $ | 24.23 | $ | 22.71 |
The following table summarizes information about the Companys stock options outstanding at December 31, 2003:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||
Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||||||
Options | Average | Weighted- | Options | Weighted- | ||||||||||||||||
Range of | Outstanding | Remaining | Average | Exercisable | Average | |||||||||||||||
Exercise | at Year | Contractual | Exercise | at Year | Exercise | |||||||||||||||
Prices | End | Life (Years) | Price | End | Price | |||||||||||||||
options in millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
$ 0.00-$33.56
|
2.7 | 2.9 | $ | 27.47 | 2.6 | $ | 29.13 | |||||||||||||
$33.60-$48.44
|
3.0 | 5.6 | $ | 41.21 | 1.5 | $ | 38.35 | |||||||||||||
$48.53-$48.53
|
5.6 | 3.3 | $ | 48.53 | 4.4 | $ | 48.53 | |||||||||||||
$48.94-$71.49
|
1.3 | 3.8 | $ | 58.72 | 1.0 | $ | 59.33 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
12.6 | 3.8 | $ | 43.28 | 9.5 | $ | 42.82 | |||||||||||||
In addition, the Plans provide that shares of common stock may be granted as restricted stock. Generally, restricted stock is subject to forfeiture restrictions and cannot be sold, transferred or disposed of during the restriction period. The holders of the restricted stock have all the rights of a stockholder of the Company with respect to such shares, including the right to vote and receive dividends or other distributions paid with respect to such shares. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, the Company issued 1.1 million, 0.2 million and 0.2 million shares, respectively, of restricted stock with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $43.64, $48.88 and $61.26 per share, respectively. In 2003, 2002 and 2001, expense related to restricted stock grants was $12 million, $13 million and $14 million, respectively. In 2001, 29,000 shares of unrestricted common stock with a weighted-average grant date fair value of $65.71 per share, were issued. In 2001, administrative and general expense of $2 million was recorded related to these shares.
79
11. Common Stock and Stock Options (Continued)
The reconciliation between basic and diluted EPS is as follows:
For the Year Ended | For the Year Ended | For the Year Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003 | December 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Per Share | Per Share | Per Share | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income | Shares | Amount | Income | Shares | Amount | Loss | Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
millions except per share amounts | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic EPS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common
stockholders before change in accounting principle
|
$ | 1,240 | 250 | $ | 4.97 | $ | 825 | 248 | $ | 3.32 | $ | (183 | ) | 250 | $ | (0.73 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Effect of convertible debentures and ZYP-CODES
|
3 | 2 | 9 | 10 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive stock options,
performance-based stock awards and common stock put options
|
| 1 | | 2 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted EPS
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) available to common
stockholders before change in accounting principle plus assumed
conversion
|
$ | 1,243 | 253 | $ | 4.91 | $ | 834 | 260 | $ | 3.21 | $ | (183 | ) | 250 | $ | (0.73 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
For the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, options for 8.4 million, 5.1 million and 1.2 million average shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation because the options exercise price was greater than the average market price of common stock for the respective period. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001, put options for 0.5 million and 1.8 million average shares, respectively, of common stock were excluded because the put options exercise price was less than the average market price of common stock for the period. For the year ended December 31, 2001, there were 15.9 million potential common shares related to outstanding stock options, convertible debentures and ZYP-CODES that were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS because they had an anti-dilutive effect.
12. Statements of Cash Flows Supplemental Information
The amounts of cash paid (received) for interest (net of amounts capitalized) and income taxes are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 262 | $ | 175 | $ | 96 | ||||||
Income taxes
|
$ | 90 | $ | (62 | ) | $ | 169 |
13. Transactions with Related Parties and Major Customers
Anadarko has three Production Sharing Agreements (PSA) with Sonatrach, the national oil and gas enterprise of Algeria. Sonatrach has owned the Companys common stock since 1986 and at year-end 2003 was the registered owner of 4.8% of Anadarkos outstanding common stock. Each PSA gives Anadarko the right to explore, develop and produce liquid hydrocarbons in Algeria, subject to the sharing of production with Sonatrach.
80
the previous discoveries. Under the terms of the three-phase exploration program, Anadarko and its joint venture partners will spend a minimum of $55 million and began drilling exploration wells in 2002.
14. Segment and Geographic Information
Anadarkos primary business segments are vertically integrated business units that are principally within the oil and gas industry. These segments are managed separately because of their unique technology, marketing and distribution requirements. The Companys three segments are upstream oil and gas activities, marketing and trading activities and minerals activities. The oil and gas exploration and production segment finds and produces natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs. The marketing and trading segment is responsible for gathering, transporting and selling most of Anadarkos natural gas production as well as volumes of gas, oil and NGLs purchased from third parties. The minerals segment finds and produces minerals in several coal, trona (natural soda ash) and industrial mineral mines. The segment shown as Intercompany Eliminations and All Other includes other smaller operating units, corporate activities, financing activities and intercompany eliminations.
81
The following table illustrates information related to Anadarkos business segments:
Intercompany | |||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and Gas | Marketing | Eliminations | |||||||||||||||||||
Exploration | and | and All | |||||||||||||||||||
and Production | Trading | Minerals | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||||||||||
2003
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 2,977 | $ | 142 | $ | 29 | $ | 1,974 | $ | 5,122 | |||||||||||
Intersegment revenues
|
1,958 | 12 | | (1,970 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
4,935 | 154 | 29 | 4 | 5,122 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
1,223 | 18 | 3 | 53 | 1,297 | ||||||||||||||||
Impairments related to oil and gas properties
|
103 | | | | 103 | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring costs
|
15 | | | 25 | 40 | ||||||||||||||||
Other costs and expenses
|
1,087 | 114 | 2 | 271 | 1,474 | ||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses
|
2,428 | 132 | 5 | 349 | 2,914 | ||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense
|
| (9 | ) | | 243 | 234 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
$ | 2,507 | $ | 31 | $ | 24 | $ | (588 | ) | $ | 1,974 | ||||||||||
Net properties and equipment
|
$ | 15,560 | $ | 253 | $ | 1,199 | $ | 384 | $ | 17,396 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
$ | 2,719 | $ | 33 | $ | | $ | 40 | $ | 2,792 | |||||||||||
Goodwill
|
$ | 1,389 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,389 | |||||||||||
2002
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 2,428 | $ | 126 | $ | 41 | $ | 1,250 | $ | 3,845 | |||||||||||
Intersegment revenues
|
1,236 | 9 | | (1,245 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
3,664 | 135 | 41 | 5 | 3,845 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
1,056 | 19 | 3 | 43 | 1,121 | ||||||||||||||||
Impairments related to oil and gas properties
|
39 | | | | 39 | ||||||||||||||||
Other costs and expenses
|
907 | 116 | 2 | 250 | 1,275 | ||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses
|
2,002 | 135 | 5 | 293 | 2,435 | ||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense
|
| (35 | ) | | 238 | 203 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
$ | 1,662 | $ | 35 | $ | 36 | $ | (526 | ) | $ | 1,207 | ||||||||||
Net properties and equipment
|
$ | 13,204 | $ | 237 | $ | 1,202 | $ | 455 | $ | 15,098 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
$ | 2,310 | $ | 13 | $ | | $ | 65 | $ | 2,388 | |||||||||||
Goodwill
|
$ | 1,434 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,434 | |||||||||||
82
Intercompany | |||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and Gas | Marketing | Eliminations | |||||||||||||||||||
Exploration | and | and All | |||||||||||||||||||
and Production | Trading | Minerals | Other | Total | |||||||||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||||||||||
2001
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 3,172 | $ | 125 | $ | 57 | $ | 1,364 | $ | 4,718 | |||||||||||
Intersegment revenues
|
1,371 | 17 | | (1,388 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
Total revenues
|
4,543 | 142 | 57 | (24 | ) | 4,718 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
1,110 | 12 | 4 | 28 | 1,154 | ||||||||||||||||
Impairments related to oil and gas properties
|
2,546 | | | | 2,546 | ||||||||||||||||
Other costs and expenses
|
950 | 115 | 4 | 312 | 1,381 | ||||||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses
|
4,606 | 127 | 8 | 340 | 5,081 | ||||||||||||||||
Other (income) expense
|
| (91 | ) | | 118 | 27 | |||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
$ | (63 | ) | $ | 106 | $ | 49 | $ | (482 | ) | $ | (390 | ) | ||||||||
Net properties and equipment
|
$ | 11,765 | $ | 253 | $ | 1,206 | $ | 413 | $ | 13,637 | |||||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
$ | 3,072 | $ | 66 | $ | | $ | 178 | $ | 3,316 | |||||||||||
Goodwill
|
$ | 1,430 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,430 | |||||||||||
The following table shows Anadarkos revenues (based on the origin of the sales) and net properties and equipment by geographic area:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Revenues
|
||||||||||||
United States
|
$ | 3,531 | $ | 2,463 | $ | 3,537 | ||||||
Canada
|
866 | 649 | 794 | |||||||||
Algeria
|
541 | 574 | 195 | |||||||||
Other International
|
184 | 159 | 192 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 5,122 | $ | 3,845 | $ | 4,718 | ||||||
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
millions | ||||||||
Net Properties and Equipment
|
||||||||
United States
|
$ | 12,734 | $ | 11,258 | ||||
Canada
|
2,924 | 2,096 | ||||||
Algeria
|
909 | 898 | ||||||
Other International
|
829 | 846 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 17,396 | $ | 15,098 | ||||
83
15. Restructuring Costs
In July 2003, Anadarko announced a cost reduction plan to reduce overhead costs from the Companys cost structure. This plan included a reduction in personnel and corporate expenses and was substantially complete as of December 31, 2003. The related costs are charged to restructuring costs in the income statement as specific liabilities are incurred. The liability balance is included in accounts payable on the balance sheet.
Total | |||||||||
Expected | |||||||||
Costs | 2003 | ||||||||
millions | |||||||||
Costs by category
|
|||||||||
One-time employee termination benefits
|
$ | 29 | $ | 29 | |||||
Contract termination costs
|
3 | 3 | |||||||
Other
|
9 | 8 | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 41 | $ | 40 | |||||
Costs by segment
|
|||||||||
Corporate
|
$ | 25 | $ | 25 | |||||
Oil and gas exploration and production
|
16 | 15 | |||||||
Total
|
$ | 41 | $ | 40 | |||||
The following table is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending restructuring costs liability balances. The remaining restructuring costs liability at December 31, 2003 is related to one-time employee termination benefits of $2 million and other costs of $3 million.
millions | |||||
Restructuring costs liability as of July 1,
2003
|
$ | | |||
Costs incurred during the period
|
40 | ||||
Cash payments during the period
|
(35 | ) | |||
Restructuring costs liability as of
December 31, 2003
|
$ | 5 | |||
16. Other Taxes
Significant taxes other than income taxes are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Production and severance
|
$ | 154 | $ | 99 | $ | 139 | ||||||
Ad valorem
|
116 | 91 | 85 | |||||||||
Payroll and other
|
24 | 24 | 23 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 294 | $ | 214 | $ | 247 | ||||||
84
17. Other (Income) Expense
Other (income) expense consists of the following:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange (gains) losses*
|
$ | (19 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | 29 | |||||
Firm transportation keep-whole contract valuation
|
(9 | ) | (35 | ) | (91 | ) | ||||||
Ineffectiveness of derivative financial
instruments
|
9 | 18 | (18 | ) | ||||||||
Gas sales contracts accretion of
discount
|
7 | 11 | 14 | |||||||||
Other
|
(7 | ) | 5 | 1 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | (19 | ) | $ | | $ | (65 | ) | ||||
* | The years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, exclude $(8) million, $35 million and $6 million, respectively, in transaction gains (losses) related primarily to remeasurement of the Venezuelan deferred tax liability. These amounts are included in income tax expense. |
18. Income Taxes
Income tax expense (benefit), including deferred amounts, is summarized as follows:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Current
|
||||||||||||
Federal
|
$ | 66 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 32 | |||||
State
|
4 | 9 | 5 | |||||||||
Foreign
|
147 | 178 | 50 | |||||||||
Total
|
217 | 179 | 87 | |||||||||
Deferred
|
||||||||||||
Federal
|
380 | 194 | (38 | ) | ||||||||
State
|
28 | 10 | (5 | ) | ||||||||
Foreign
|
104 | (7 | ) | (258 | ) | |||||||
Total
|
512 | 197 | (301 | ) | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 729 | $ | 376 | $ | (214 | ) | |||||
85
Total income taxes were different than the amounts computed by applying the statutory income tax rate to income (loss) before income taxes. The sources of these differences are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||
Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes
|
|||||||||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 1,359 | $ | 706 | $ | 67 | |||||||
Foreign
|
615 | 501 | (457 | ) | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,974 | $ | 1,207 | $ | (390 | ) | ||||||
Statutory tax rate
|
35 | % | 35 | % | 35 | % | |||||||
Tax computed at statutory rate
|
$ | 691 | $ | 423 | $ | (137 | ) | ||||||
Adjustments resulting from:
|
|||||||||||||
State income taxes (net of federal income tax
benefit)
|
21 | 12 | | ||||||||||
Oil and gas credits
|
(17 | ) | (15 | ) | (22 | ) | |||||||
Taxes related to foreign operations (net of
federal income tax benefit)
|
63 | (42 | ) | (51 | ) | ||||||||
Reversal of goodwill amortization
|
| | 22 | ||||||||||
Effect of change in Canadian income tax rates
|
(46 | ) | (5 | ) | (31 | ) | |||||||
Other net
|
17 | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
$ | 729 | $ | 376 | $ | (214 | ) | ||||||
Effective tax rate
|
37 | % | 31 | % | 55 | % | |||||||
The tax benefit of compensation expense for tax purposes in excess of amounts recognized for financial accounting purposes has been credited directly to stockholders equity. For 2003, 2002 and 2001, the tax benefit amounted to $1 million, $8 million and $6 million, respectively.
86
The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax liabilities (assets) at December 31, 2003 and 2002 are as follows:
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
millions | ||||||||
Oil and gas exploration and development costs
|
$ | 3,573 | $ | 2,942 | ||||
Mineral operations
|
419 | 423 | ||||||
Other
|
725 | 792 | ||||||
Gross noncurrent deferred tax liabilities
|
4,717 | 4,157 | ||||||
Net operating loss carryforward
|
(231 | ) | (102 | ) | ||||
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward
|
(151 | ) | (146 | ) | ||||
Other
|
(298 | ) | (378 | ) | ||||
Gross noncurrent deferred tax assets
|
(680 | ) | (626 | ) | ||||
Less: valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
not expected to be realized
|
215 | 102 | ||||||
Net noncurrent deferred tax assets
|
(465 | ) | (524 | ) | ||||
Net noncurrent deferred tax liabilities
|
$ | 4,252 | $ | 3,633 | ||||
Approximately $58 million of the net increase in the valuation allowance during 2003 is attributable to a change in judgment about the expected realization of an existing foreign deferred tax asset. The remainder of the increase is attributable to the establishment of valuation allowances on deferred tax assets recorded in the current year.
Domestic | Foreign | |||||||||||||||
Domestic | Foreign | Expiration | Expiration | |||||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||||||
Alternative minimum tax (AMT) credit
|
$ | 151 | $ | | Unlimited | | ||||||||||
General business tax credit
|
$ | 4 | $ | 3 | 2023 | 2004-2005 | ||||||||||
Net operating loss regular tax
|
$ | 10 | $ | 351 | 2018-2019 | 2004-Unlimited | ||||||||||
Net operating loss AMT
|
$ | 10 | $ | | 2018-2019 | | ||||||||||
Net operating loss state
|
$ | 1,471 | $ | | 2004-2020 | | ||||||||||
Capital loss
|
$ | 23 | $ | 21 | 2006 | Unlimited | ||||||||||
Foreign tax credit
|
$ | 26 | $ | | 2005-2008 | |
87
19. Commitments
Leases The Company has various commitments under noncancelable operating lease agreements for buildings, facilities, aircraft and equipment, the majority of which expire at various dates through 2016. The Company also maintains a capital lease for certain furniture and office walls, which were sold but the liability was retained. The majority of the operating leases are expected to be renewed or replaced as they expire. At December 31, 2003, future minimum lease payments and receipts due under operating and capital leases are as follows:
Operating | ||||||||||||
Capital | Operating | Sublease | ||||||||||
Leases | Leases | Income | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
2004
|
$ | 6 | $ | 57 | $ | (7 | ) | |||||
2005
|
1 | 60 | (5 | ) | ||||||||
2006
|
| 60 | (5 | ) | ||||||||
2007
|
| 60 | (5 | ) | ||||||||
2008
|
| 58 | (5 | ) | ||||||||
Later years
|
| 103 | (16 | ) | ||||||||
Total future minimum lease payments
|
7 | $ | 398 | $ | (43 | ) | ||||||
Less: amounts representing interest
|
| |||||||||||
Present value of minimum capital lease obligations
|
7 | |||||||||||
Less: short-term portion of capital lease
obligations
|
6 | |||||||||||
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations
|
$ | 1 | ||||||||||
Total rental expense, net of sublease income, amounted to $31 million, $42 million and $43 million in 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Buildings During 2003, the Companys two corporate office buildings located in The Woodlands, Texas, were acquired by a wholly-owned subsidiary of a major financial institution from the special purpose entities that had leased the buildings to the Company. The original leases were amended and restated, and, other than the extension of the period of the lease, the terms of the replacement lease between the Company and the real estate development company were essentially unchanged. The total amount funded under the new lease was approximately $214 million. The Company has accounted for this arrangement as an operating lease.
88
Aircraft The table of future minimum lease payments above includes the Companys lease payment obligations of $7 million related to an aircraft operating lease financed by a synthetic lease. This lease includes a residual value guarantee for any deficiency if the aircraft is sold for less than the sale option amount (approximately $11 million). In addition, the Company is entitled to any proceeds from a sale of the aircraft in excess of the sale option amount. No liability has been recorded related to this guarantee.
Production Platform In 2002, the Company entered into an agreement under which a floating production platform for its Marco Polo discovery in Green Canyon Block 608 of the Gulf of Mexico will be installed. The other party to the agreement constructed and owns the platform and production facilities that upon mechanical completion will be operated by Anadarko. The agreement provides that Anadarko dedicate its production from Green Canyon Block 608 and 11 other Green Canyon blocks to the production facilities. The agreement requires a monthly demand charge of slightly over $2 million for five years and a processing fee based upon production throughput. Anadarkos commitment to begin payments for the monthly demand charges is incurred upon mechanical completion, which is expected in 2004. The table of future minimum lease payments above includes amounts related to the monthly demand charge for this agreement. The agreement does not contain any purchase options, purchase obligations or value guarantees.
20. Pension Plans, Other Postretirement Benefits and Employee Savings Plans
Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits The Company has defined benefit pension plans and supplemental pension plans that are noncontributory pension plans. The Company also has a foreign pension plan which is a contributory defined benefit pension plan. The Company also provides certain health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees. Health care benefits are funded by contributions from the Company and the retiree, with the retiree contributions adjusted according to the provisions of the Companys health care plans. The Companys retiree life insurance plan is noncontributory. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for the majority of its plans.
89
20. | Pension Plans, Other Postretirement Benefits and Employee Savings Plans (Continued) |
The following table sets forth the Companys pension and other postretirement benefits changes in benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, funded status and amounts recognized in the financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and 2002.
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | ||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | ||||||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||||||
Change in benefit obligation
|
|||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$ | 489 | $ | 417 | $ | 131 | $ | 123 | |||||||||
Service cost
|
22 | 14 | 7 | 5 | |||||||||||||
Interest cost
|
34 | 29 | 9 | 8 | |||||||||||||
Plan amendments
|
21 | | (6 | ) | (7 | ) | |||||||||||
Special termination benefits
|
3 | | | | |||||||||||||
Actuarial loss
|
26 | 61 | 29 | 8 | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange rate change
|
8 | | | | |||||||||||||
Benefit payments
|
(44 | ) | (32 | ) | (9 | ) | (6 | ) | |||||||||
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
$ | 559 | $ | 489 | $ | 161 | $ | 131 | |||||||||
Change in plan assets
|
|||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
$ | 286 | $ | 338 | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Actual return on plan assets
|
58 | (26 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
Employer contributions
|
66 | 6 | 9 | 6 | |||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange rate change
|
9 | | | | |||||||||||||
Benefit payments
|
(44 | ) | (32 | ) | (9 | ) | (6 | ) | |||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
$ | 375 | $ | 286 | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Funded status of the plan
|
$ | (184 | ) | $ | (203 | ) | $ | (161 | ) | $ | (131 | ) | |||||
Unrecognized actuarial loss
|
174 | 195 | 58 | 31 | |||||||||||||
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
8 | 8 | | 8 | |||||||||||||
Unrecognized initial asset
|
| (1 | ) | | | ||||||||||||
Total recognized
|
$ | (2 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (103 | ) | $ | (92 | ) | |||||
Total recognized amounts in the balance sheet
consist of:
|
|||||||||||||||||
Prepaid benefit cost
|
$ | 21 | $ | 24 | $ | | $ | | |||||||||
Accrued benefit liability
|
(123 | ) | (155 | ) | (103 | ) | (92 | ) | |||||||||
Intangible asset
|
10 | 11 | | | |||||||||||||
Other comprehensive expense
|
90 | 119 | | | |||||||||||||
Total recognized
|
$ | (2 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (103 | ) | $ | (92 | ) | |||||
The accumulated benefit obligation for all defined benefit pension plans was $492 million and $427 million as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and fair value of plan assets for the pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $530 million, $463 million and $332 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2003, and $467 million, $404 million and $251 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2002. The Companys benefit obligation under the unfunded pension plans are secured by the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Executives and Directors Benefits Trust. See Note 11.
90
20. | Pension Plans, Other Postretirement Benefits and Employee Savings Plans (Continued) |
Part D. Under FASB Staff Position No. FAS 106-1, Accounting and Disclosure Requirements Related to the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, the Company has made a one-time election to defer accounting for the effect of the Act for the year ended December 31, 2003. The accumulated projected benefit obligation and the net periodic benefit cost included in other benefits do not reflect the effects of the Act on the Plan. The authoritative guidance on the accounting for the federal subsidy is pending and, when issued, could require the Company to change previously reported information.
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||||||||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Components of net periodic benefit
cost
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$ | 22 | $ | 14 | $ | 11 | $ | 7 | $ | 5 | $ | 3 | ||||||||||||
Interest cost
|
34 | 29 | 27 | 9 | 8 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets
|
(30 | ) | (31 | ) | (28 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Settlements
|
17 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Special termination benefits
|
3 | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization values and deferrals
|
14 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | (1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost
|
$ | 60 | $ | 16 | $ | 11 | $ | 18 | $ | 14 | $ | 8 | ||||||||||||
As a result of the Companys cost reduction plan, a special termination benefit charge of $3 million was expensed to restructuring costs in 2003. See Note 15. As a result of executive retirements, a settlement charge of $17 million was expensed to administrative and general expense. The increase (decrease) in the Companys minimum liability included in other comprehensive income related to the pension plans was $(29) million, $115 million and $4 million for 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Pension | Other | |||||||||||||||
Benefits | Benefits | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
percent | ||||||||||||||||
Discount rate
|
6.25 | % | 6.75 | % | 6.25 | % | 6.75 | % | ||||||||
Rates of increase in compensation levels
|
5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.0 | % |
Following are the weighted-average assumptions used by the Company in determining the net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit cost for 2003 and 2002:
Pension | Other | |||||||||||||||
Benefits | Benefits | |||||||||||||||
2003 | 2002 | 2003 | 2002 | |||||||||||||
percent | ||||||||||||||||
Discount rate
|
6.75 | % | 7.25 | % | 6.75 | % | 7.25 | % | ||||||||
Long-term rate of return on plan assets
|
8.0 | % | 9.0 | % | n/a | n/a | ||||||||||
Rates of increase in compensation levels
|
5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.0 | % | 5.0 | % |
The Company has adopted a balanced, diversified investment strategy, with the intent of maximizing returns without exposure to undue risk. Investments are made through investment managers across several investment categories (Domestic Large and Small Cap, International, Domestic Fixed Income, Real Estate and Private Equity), with selective exposure to Growth/ Value investment styles. Each investment is expected to perform relative to the appropriate index benchmark for its category. Target asset allocation percentages by major category to be implemented
91
20. | Pension Plans, Other Postretirement Benefits and Employee Savings Plans (Continued) |
in 2004 are 65% equity securities, 25% fixed income, 5% real estate and 5% private equity. Investment managers have full discretion as to investment decisions regarding all funds under their management to the extent permitted within investment guidelines. Certain investments are prohibited, including short sales, sales on margin, securities of companies in bankruptcy, investments in financial futures and commodities and currency exchanges.
2003 | 2002 | |||||||
percent | ||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Equity securities
|
69 | % | 55 | % | ||||
Fixed income
|
27 | 43 | ||||||
Other
|
4 | 2 | ||||||
Total
|
100 | % | 100 | % | ||||
There are no direct investments in Anadarko common stock included in plan assets, however there may be indirect investments in Anadarko common stock through the plans mutual fund investments. The expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption was determined using the year-end 2003 pension investment balances by category and projected target asset allocations for 2004. The expected return for each of these categories was determined by using capital market projections provided by the Companys external pension consultants, with consideration of actual ten-year performance statistics for investments in place. The return assumption is slightly conservative in recognition of the accumulated unrecognized loss included in net assets of the Companys pension plans.
Pension Benefits | Other Benefits | |||||||
millions | ||||||||
2004
|
$ | 62 | $ | 9 | ||||
2005
|
45 | 8 | ||||||
2006
|
49 | 9 | ||||||
2007
|
53 | 10 | ||||||
2008
|
53 | 10 | ||||||
2009-2013
|
293 | 66 |
For year-end 2003 measurement purposes, a 10% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2003. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5% in 2008 and later years. For year-end 2002 measurement purposes, a 9% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits was assumed for 2002. The rate was assumed to decrease gradually to 5% in 2006 and later years. The assumed health care cost trend rate has a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plan. A 1% change in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have the following effects:
1% Increase | 1% Decrease | |||||||
millions | ||||||||
Effect on total of service and interest cost
components
|
$ | 3 | $ | (3 | ) | |||
Effect on other postretirement benefit obligation
|
$ | 19 | $ | (16 | ) |
Employee Savings Plan The Company has an employee savings plan (ESP), which is a defined contribution plan. The Company matches a portion of employees contributions with shares of the Companys common stock. Participation in the ESP is voluntary and all regular employees of the Company are eligible to participate. The Company charged to expense plan contributions of $14 million, $12 million and $11 million during 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively. The contributions were funded through the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP).
92
20. | Pension Plans, Other Postretirement Benefits and Employee Savings Plans (Continued) |
Employee Stock Ownership Plan The ESOP shares, which are held in trust, were originally purchased with the proceeds from a 30-year loan from a subsidiary in 1997. These shares were pledged as collateral for the loan. As loan payments are made, shares are released from collateral, based on the proportion of debt service paid. Scheduled principal and interest requirements are funded with dividends paid on the ESOP shares and with cash contributions from the Company. Principal or interest prepayments may be made to ensure that the Companys minimum matching obligation is met.
21. Contingencies
General The Company is a defendant in a number of lawsuits and is involved in governmental proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including, but not limited to, royalty claims, contract claims and environmental claims. The Company has also been named as a defendant in various personal injury claims, including numerous claims by employees of third-party contractors alleging exposure to asbestos, silica and benzene while working at a refinery in Corpus Christi, Texas, which a company Anadarko acquired by merger in 2000 sold in segments in 1987 and 1989. While the ultimate outcome and impact on the Company cannot be predicted with certainty, Management believes that the resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Company, although results of operations and cash flow could be significantly impacted in the reporting periods in which such matters are resolved. Discussed below are several specific proceedings.
Royalty Litigation The Company is subject to various claims from its royalty owners in the regular course of its business as an oil and gas producer, including disputes regarding measurement, costs and expenses beyond the wellhead, and basis valuations. Among such claims, the Company was named as a defendant in a case styled U.S. of America ex rel. Harold E. Wright v. AGIP Company, et al. (the Gas Qui Tam case) filed in September 2000 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Lufkin Division. This lawsuit generally alleges that the Company and 118 other defendants improperly measured and otherwise undervalued natural gas in connection with a payment of royalties on production from federal and Indian lands. Based on the Companys present understanding of the various governmental and False Claims Act proceedings described above, the Company believes that it has substantial defenses to these claims and intends to vigorously assert such defenses. However, if the Company is found to have violated the Civil False Claims Act, the Company could be subject to a variety of sanctions, including treble damages and substantial monetary fines. The case was transferred to the U.S. District Court, Multi-District Litigation (MDL) Docket pending in Wyoming. All defendants jointly filed a motion to dismiss the action on jurisdictional grounds based on Mr. Wrights failure to qualify as the original source of the information underlying his fraud claims, and the Company filed additional motions to dismiss on separate grounds. The MDL Panel remanded the case to the federal court in Lufkin, Texas without ruling on the motions for dismissal. The proceedings were delayed for procedural reasons as the case was remanded and a new judge was appointed; however, the Company now expects to obtain a hearing on its motions for dismissal in early 2004.
93
$100 million was asserted. The Company appealed the class certification order. A favorable decision from the Houston Court of Appeals decertified the class. The royalty owners did not appeal this matter to the Texas Supreme Court and the decision from the Houston Court of Appeals became final in the second quarter of 2002. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the royalty owners filed a new petition alleging that the class may properly be brought so long as sub-class groups are broken out. The Company is vigorously contesting this new petition. The same attorneys who filed the Neinast lawsuit as a state-wide class action also filed a lawsuit, styled Hankins, Lowell F., et al. v. Union Pacific Resources Group Inc., et al., in the 112th Judicial District Court, Crockett County, Texas. The two lawsuits are substantially identical, except that the Hankins lawsuit is limited to royalty owners in Crockett and Sutton Counties. The Texas Supreme Court has reversed certification of this class; however, as with the Neinast case, the plaintiffs have indicated that they may seek certification of sub-classes and continue to prosecute the claims. The Company continues to vigorously defend itself against the claims.
T-Bar X Lawsuit T-Bar X Limited Company v. Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, a case filed in the 82nd Judicial District Court of Robertson County, Texas, involves a dispute regarding a confidentiality agreement that Anadarko executed in August 1999. On January 28, 2004, based upon a jury verdict, the court entered a $145 million judgment in favor of the plaintiff as follows: $40 million in actual damages; $100 million in punitive damages; and, $5 million in pre-judgment interest. The Company believes that it has strong arguments for a reversal on appeal. Anadarko and outside counsel believe that, following appeals, it is not probable that the judgment will be affirmed. If a judgment is reversed and remanded for a new trial, Anadarko will vigorously defend itself on retrial. While the ultimate outcome and impact of this claim on Anadarko cannot be predicted with certainty, Anadarko believes that the resolution of these proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position.
Superfund Operating Industries, Inc. (Federal) The former municipal industrial landfill, located in Monterey Park, California, was operational between 1948 and 1984. A company Anadarko acquired by merger in 2000 was noticed as a Potentially Responsible Party in June 1986 for its Wilmington Production Fields and Wilmington Refinerys contributions. The Company participated in a settlement with the Environmental Protection Agency. The Companys share of the settlement was about $5 million.
CITGO Litigation CITGO Petroleum Corporations (CITGO) claims arise out of an Asset Purchase and Contribution Agreement in 1987 whereby a company Anadarko acquired by merger in 2000 sold a refinery located in Corpus Christi, Texas to CITGOs predecessor. After the sale of the refinery, numerous individuals living near the refinery sued CITGO (the Neighborhood Litigation) thereby implicating the Asset Purchase and Contribution Agreement indemnity provision. CITGO and Anadarko eventually entered into a settlement agreement to allocate, on an interim basis, each
94
partys liability for defense and liability cost in that and related litigation. That agreement provides that once the Neighborhood Litigation and certain related claims are resolved, then the parties will determine their final indemnity obligations to each other through binding arbitration. At the present time, Anadarko and CITGO have agreed to defer arbitrating the allocation of responsibility for this liability in order to focus their efforts on a global settlement. Arbitration will resume upon request of either CITGO or Anadarko. Negotiations and discussions with CITGO continue. Anadarko has offered to settle all outstanding issues for approximately $4 million and a liability for this amount has been accrued.
Kansas Ad Valorem Tax The Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 allowed a severance, production or similar tax to be included as an add-on, over and above the maximum lawful price charged for natural gas. Based on the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) ruling that the Kansas ad valorem tax was such a tax, the Company collected the Kansas ad valorem tax. FERCs ruling regarding the ability of producers to collect the Kansas ad valorem tax was appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit). Ultimately, the D.C. Circuit issued a decision on August 2, 1996 ruling that producers must refund all Kansas ad valorem taxes collected relating to production since October 1983. The Company filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court. That petition was denied on May 12, 1997.
Other The Company is subject to other legal proceedings, claims and liabilities which arise in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of the Company, the liability with respect to these actions will not have a material effect on the Company.
Lease Agreement The Company, through one of its affiliates, is a party to a lease agreement (base lease) for the leveraged lease financing of the Corpus Christi West Plant Refinery (West Plant). The initial term of the lease expired December 31, 2003, but Anadarko has renewal options extending through January 31, 2011. At the conclusion of the initial term of the base lease or any renewal period, the Company has the right to purchase the West Plant at the fair market sales value. On January 31, 2011, the Company has the right to purchase the West Plant at a fair market sales value computed using a specified formula, which the Company believes will result in a nominal price. The West Plant has been subleased to CITGO with sublease payments during the initial term equal to the Companys base lease payments and during any renewal period equal to the lesser of the base lease rental, which will be tied to the annual fair market rental value or a specified maximum amount. Additionally, CITGO has the option under the sublease to purchase the West Plant from the Company at the conclusion of the initial term or any renewal term at the fair market sales value, or on January 31, 2011 at a nominal price. If the fair market rental value of the base lease during any renewal term exceeds CITGOs maximum obligation under the sublease, or if CITGO purchases the West Plant on January 31, 2011 and the fair market sales value of the West Plant is greater than the purchase amount specified in the sublease, the Company will be obligated to pay the excess amounts. The fair market rental value of the West Plant for the renewal term is currently being determined by the appraisal process as specified in the lease agreement. In order to resolve certain issues raised by the appraisers, the parties entered into an arbitration agreement. Through the arbitration process, issues of contractual interpretation will be clarified to allow the appraisers to complete their value determination. As of December 31, 2003, Anadarko had not recorded a liability for any loss relating to the lease renewals.
Guarantees Anadarko is guarantor for certain obligations of its wholly-owned and consolidated subsidiaries, which are included in the consolidated financial statements and notes. The Company has also made residual value guarantees
95
in connection with aircraft operating leases for any deficiency if the aircraft are sold for less than the maximum lessee risk amount of approximately $15 million. No liability has been recorded related to these guarantees.
96
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Activities
The following is historical revenue and cost information relating to the Companys oil and gas activities.
Costs Excluded
Excluded from amounts subject to amortization as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 are $2.5 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively, of costs associated with unproved properties and major development projects. The majority of the evaluation activities are expected to be completed within five to ten years.
Costs Excluded by Year Incurred
Year Costs Incurred | Excluded | |||||||||||||||||||
Costs at | ||||||||||||||||||||
Prior | Dec. 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
Years | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2003 | ||||||||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
Property acquisition
|
$ | 1,013 | $ | 59 | $ | 159 | $ | 137 | $ | 1,368 | ||||||||||
Exploration
|
347 | 217 | 115 | 209 | 888 | |||||||||||||||
Capitalized interest
|
41 | 84 | 54 | 89 | 268 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,401 | $ | 360 | $ | 328 | $ | 435 | $ | 2,524 | ||||||||||
Costs Excluded by Country
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. | Canada | Algeria | International | Total | ||||||||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
Property acquisition
|
$ | 1,288 | $ | 80 | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,368 | ||||||||||
Exploration
|
521 | 228 | 9 | 130 | 888 | |||||||||||||||
Capitalized interest
|
221 | 35 | | 12 | 268 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,030 | $ | 343 | $ | 9 | $ | 142 | $ | 2,524 | ||||||||||
Changes in Costs Excluded by Country
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. | Canada | Algeria | International | Total | ||||||||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2001
|
$ | 2,760 | $ | 592 | $ | | $ | 221 | $ | 3,573 | ||||||||||
Additional costs incurred
|
899 | 74 | 11 | 66 | 1,050 | |||||||||||||||
Costs transferred to DD&A pool
|
(1,279 | ) | (160 | ) | | (102 | ) | (1,541 | ) | |||||||||||
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
| 3 | | | 3 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002
|
2,380 | 509 | 11 | 185 | 3,085 | |||||||||||||||
Additional costs incurred
|
487 | 60 | | 57 | 604 | |||||||||||||||
Costs transferred to DD&A pool
|
(837 | ) | (329 | ) | (2 | ) | (100 | ) | (1,268 | ) | ||||||||||
Impact of foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
| 103 | | | 103 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
$ | 2,030 | $ | 343 | $ | 9 | $ | 142 | $ | 2,524 | ||||||||||
97
Capitalized Costs Related to Oil and Gas Producing Activities
2003 | 2002 | ||||||||
millions | |||||||||
United States
|
|||||||||
Capitalized
|
|||||||||
Unproved properties
|
$ | 2,030 | $ | 2,380 | |||||
Proved properties
|
15,213 | 12,639 | |||||||
17,243 | 15,019 | ||||||||
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
6,309 | 5,621 | |||||||
Net capitalized costs
|
10,934 | 9,398 | |||||||
Canada
|
|||||||||
Capitalized
|
|||||||||
Unproved properties
|
343 | 509 | |||||||
Proved properties
|
4,401 | 2,870 | |||||||
4,744 | 3,379 | ||||||||
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
1,846 | 1,309 | |||||||
Net capitalized costs
|
2,898 | 2,070 | |||||||
Algeria
|
|||||||||
Capitalized
|
|||||||||
Unproved properties
|
9 | 11 | |||||||
Proved properties
|
1,136 | 1,052 | |||||||
1,145 | 1,063 | ||||||||
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
246 | 173 | |||||||
Net capitalized costs
|
899 | 890 | |||||||
Other International
|
|||||||||
Capitalized
|
|||||||||
Unproved properties
|
142 | 185 | |||||||
Proved properties
|
998 | 821 | |||||||
1,140 | 1,006 | ||||||||
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
311 | 160 | |||||||
Net capitalized costs
|
829 | 846 | |||||||
Total
|
|||||||||
Capitalized
|
|||||||||
Unproved properties
|
2,524 | 3,085 | |||||||
Proved properties
|
21,748 | 17,382 | |||||||
24,272 | 20,467 | ||||||||
Accumulated depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
8,712 | 7,263 | |||||||
Net capitalized costs
|
$ | 15,560 | $ | 13,204 | |||||
98
Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Producing Activities
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||
United
States Capitalized
|
|||||||||||||
Property acquisition
|
|||||||||||||
Exploration
|
$ | 100 | $ | 341 | $ | 156 | |||||||
Development
|
203 | 248 | 31 | ||||||||||
Exploration
|
454 | 654 | 840 | ||||||||||
Development(1)
|
1,251 | 715 | 1,196 | ||||||||||
Total United States Finding and
Development Costs
|
2,008 | 1,958 | 2,223 | ||||||||||
Plus: Asset retirement costs
|
164 | | | ||||||||||
Less: Actual retirement expenditures
|
(15 | ) | | | |||||||||
Total United States Costs
Incurred(2)
|
2,157 | 1,958 | 2,223 | ||||||||||
Canada
Capitalized
|
|||||||||||||
Property acquisition
|
|||||||||||||
Exploration
|
24 | 25 | 309 | ||||||||||
Development
|
| 3 | 835 | ||||||||||
Exploration
|
176 | 138 | 223 | ||||||||||
Development(1)
|
297 | 237 | 233 | ||||||||||
Total Canada Finding and Development
Costs
|
497 | 403 | 1,600 | ||||||||||
Plus: Asset retirement costs
|
15 | | | ||||||||||
Less: Actual retirement expenditures
|
(5 | ) | | | |||||||||
Total Canada Costs
Incurred(2)
|
507 | 403 | 1,600 | ||||||||||
Algeria
Capitalized
|
|||||||||||||
Exploration
|
17 | 15 | 2 | ||||||||||
Development(1)
|
61 | 140 | 179 | ||||||||||
Total Algeria Finding and Development
Costs
|
78 | 155 | 181 | ||||||||||
Plus: Asset retirement costs
|
1 | | | ||||||||||
Less: Actual retirement expenditures
|
| | | ||||||||||
Total Algeria Costs
Incurred(2)
|
79 | 155 | 181 | ||||||||||
Other
International Capitalized
|
|||||||||||||
Property acquisition
|
|||||||||||||
Exploration
|
| 11 | 30 | ||||||||||
Development
|
| 26 | 67 | ||||||||||
Exploration
|
66 | 54 | 65 | ||||||||||
Development(1)
|
70 | 108 | 136 | ||||||||||
Total Other International Finding and
Development Costs
|
136 | 199 | 298 | ||||||||||
Plus: Asset retirement costs
|
7 | | | ||||||||||
Less: Actual retirement expenditures
|
| | | ||||||||||
Total Other International Costs
Incurred(2)
|
$ | 143 | $ | 199 | $ | 298 | |||||||
99
Costs Incurred in Oil and Gas Producing Activities (Continued)
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||
Total
Capitalized
|
|||||||||||||
Property acquisition
|
|||||||||||||
Exploration
|
$ | 124 | $ | 377 | $ | 495 | |||||||
Development
|
203 | 277 | 933 | ||||||||||
Exploration
|
713 | 861 | 1,130 | ||||||||||
Development(1)
|
1,679 | 1,200 | 1,744 | ||||||||||
Total Finding and Development Costs
|
2,719 | 2,715 | 4,302 | ||||||||||
Plus: Asset retirement costs
|
187 | | | ||||||||||
Less: Actual retirement expenditures
|
(20 | ) | | | |||||||||
Total Costs Incurred(2)
|
$ | 2,886 | $ | 2,715 | $ | 4,302 | |||||||
(1) | Development costs for 2003 include costs related to December 31, 2002 proved undeveloped reserves of $507 million for the United States, $92 million for Canada, $35 million for Algeria and $25 million for Other International, which total $659 million. Development costs for 2002 include costs related to December 31, 2001 proved undeveloped reserves of $336 million for the United States, $65 million for Canada, $87 million for Algeria and $70 million for Other International, which total $558 million. |
(2) | The 2003 total costs incurred include asset retirement costs and exclude actual asset retirement expenditures in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board staff memorandum issued January 21, 2004. The 2003 total costs incurred exclude the initial asset retirement costs of $352 million as of January 1, 2003. Finding and development costs are consistent with prior years costs incurred. |
100
Results of Operations for Producing Activities
The following schedule includes only the revenues from the production and sale of gas, oil, condensate and NGLs. Results of operations from gas, oil and NGLs marketing and gas gathering are excluded. The income tax expense is calculated by applying the current statutory tax rates to the revenues after deducting costs, which include DD&A allowances, after giving effect to permanent differences. The results of operations exclude general office overhead and interest expense attributable to oil and gas activities.
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||
United States
|
|||||||||||||
Net revenues from production
|
|||||||||||||
Third-party sales of gas, oil, condensate and NGLs
|
$ | 2,053 | $ | 1,570 | $ | 2,237 | |||||||
Gas and oil sold to consolidated affiliates
|
1,392 | 804 | 1,212 | ||||||||||
3,445 | 2,374 | 3,449 | |||||||||||
Production costs
|
|||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses
|
349 | 312 | 303 | ||||||||||
Cost of product and transportation
|
126 | 107 | 153 | ||||||||||
Production related administrative and general
expenses
|
16 | 14 | 14 | ||||||||||
Other taxes
|
247 | 172 | 201 | ||||||||||
738 | 605 | 671 | |||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
827 | 710 | 792 | ||||||||||
Impairments related to oil and gas properties
|
| | 1,701 | ||||||||||
Restructuring costs
|
15 | | | ||||||||||
1,865 | 1,059 | 285 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense
|
647 | 365 | 81 | ||||||||||
Results of operations
|
$ | 1,218 | $ | 694 | $ | 204 | |||||||
DD&A rate per net equivalent barrel
|
$ | 6.15 | $ | 5.46 | $ | 5.54 | |||||||
Canada
|
|||||||||||||
Net revenues from production
|
|||||||||||||
Third-party sales of gas, oil, condensate and NGLs
|
$ | 828 | $ | 629 | $ | 760 | |||||||
Gas and oil sold to consolidated affiliates
|
30 | 12 | 23 | ||||||||||
858 | 641 | 783 | |||||||||||
Production costs
|
|||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses
|
163 | 156 | 158 | ||||||||||
Cost of product and transportation
|
22 | 19 | 15 | ||||||||||
Production related administrative and general
expenses
|
39 | 31 | 16 | ||||||||||
Other taxes
|
18 | 18 | 14 | ||||||||||
242 | 224 | 203 | |||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
259 | 215 | 225 | ||||||||||
Impairments related to oil and gas properties
|
| | 808 | ||||||||||
357 | 202 | (453 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
147 | 86 | (193 | ) | |||||||||
Results of operations
|
$ | 210 | $ | 116 | $ | (260 | ) | ||||||
DD&A rate per net equivalent barrel
|
$ | 8.58 | $ | 6.09 | $ | 6.62 | |||||||
101
Results of Operations for Producing Activities (Continued)
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||
Algeria
|
|||||||||||||
Net revenues from production
|
|||||||||||||
Third-party sales of oil
|
$ | 171 | $ | 182 | $ | 59 | |||||||
Oil sold to consolidated affiliates
|
370 | 392 | 136 | ||||||||||
541 | 574 | 195 | |||||||||||
Production costs
|
|||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses
|
22 | 14 | 9 | ||||||||||
Cost of product and transportation
|
18 | 17 | 6 | ||||||||||
Production related administrative and general
expenses
|
8 | 10 | 6 | ||||||||||
48 | 41 | 21 | |||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
70 | 69 | 24 | ||||||||||
423 | 464 | 150 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense
|
161 | 176 | 54 | ||||||||||
Results of operations
|
$ | 262 | $ | 288 | $ | 96 | |||||||
DD&A rate per net equivalent barrel
|
$ | 3.68 | $ | 2.93 | $ | 3.00 | |||||||
Other International
|
|||||||||||||
Net revenues from production
|
|||||||||||||
Third-party sales of gas, oil and condensate
|
$ | 124 | $ | 131 | $ | 193 | |||||||
Oil sold to consolidated affiliates
|
60 | 28 | | ||||||||||
184 | 159 | 193 | |||||||||||
Production costs
|
|||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses
|
62 | 60 | 49 | ||||||||||
Cost of product and transportation
|
| | 8 | ||||||||||
Production related administrative and general
expenses
|
5 | 5 | 6 | ||||||||||
Other taxes
|
2 | 3 | 17 | ||||||||||
69 | 68 | 80 | |||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
67 | 62 | 69 | ||||||||||
Impairments related to oil and gas properties
|
103 | 39 | 37 | ||||||||||
(55 | ) | (10 | ) | 7 | |||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
(22 | ) | (4 | ) | 3 | ||||||||
Results of operations
|
$ | (33 | ) | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 4 | |||||
DD&A rate per net equivalent barrel
|
$ | 8.44 | $ | 7.75 | $ | 5.31 | |||||||
102
Results of Operations for Producing Activities (Continued)
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||
millions | |||||||||||||
Total
|
|||||||||||||
Net revenues from production
|
|||||||||||||
Third-party sales of gas, oil, condensate and NGLs
|
$ | 3,176 | $ | 2,512 | $ | 3,249 | |||||||
Gas and oil sold to consolidated affiliates
|
1,852 | 1,236 | 1,371 | ||||||||||
5,028 | 3,748 | 4,620 | |||||||||||
Production costs
|
|||||||||||||
Direct operating expenses
|
596 | 542 | 519 | ||||||||||
Cost of product and transportation
|
166 | 143 | 182 | ||||||||||
Production related administrative and general
expenses
|
68 | 60 | 42 | ||||||||||
Other taxes
|
267 | 193 | 232 | ||||||||||
1,097 | 938 | 975 | |||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
1,223 | 1,056 | 1,110 | ||||||||||
Impairments related to oil and gas properties
|
103 | 39 | 2,546 | ||||||||||
Restructuring costs
|
15 | | | ||||||||||
2,590 | 1,715 | (11 | ) | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
933 | 623 | (55 | ) | |||||||||
Results of operations
|
$ | 1,657 | $ | 1,092 | $ | 44 | |||||||
DD&A rate per net equivalent barrel
|
$ | 6.38 | $ | 5.36 | $ | 5.61 | |||||||
103
Oil and Gas Reserves
The following table shows internal estimates prepared by the Companys engineers of proved reserves, proved developed reserves and proved undeveloped reserves (PUDs), net of royalty interests, of natural gas, crude oil, condensate and NGLs owned at year-end and changes in proved reserves during the last three years. Volumes for natural gas are in billions of cubic feet (Bcf) at a pressure base of 14.73 pounds per square inch and volumes for oil, condensate and NGLs are in millions of barrels (MMBbls). Total volumes are in millions of barrels of oil equivalent (MMBOE). For this computation, one barrel is the equivalent of six thousand cubic feet of gas. NGLs are included with oil and condensate reserves and the associated shrinkage has been deducted from the gas reserves.
104
Oil and Gas Reserves (Continued)
The following table presents the Companys PUDs vintage, geographic location and percentage of total proved reserves as of December 31, 2003:
Percentage | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | of Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. | Canada | Algeria | Intl | Total | Proved Reserves | |||||||||||||||||||
MMBOE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year added
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2003
|
268 | 23 | 27 | 10 | 328 | 13 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2002
|
63 | 24 | 13 | | 100 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2001
|
92 | 16 | 36 | 40 | 184 | 7 | % | |||||||||||||||||
2000
|
10 | 9 | 20 | 19 | 58 | 2 | % | |||||||||||||||||
1999
|
4 | | 7 | | 11 | 1 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Prior years
|
29 | | 76 | | 105 | 4 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Undeveloped Reserves
|
466 | 72 | 179 | 69 | 786 | 31 | % | |||||||||||||||||
Total Proved Reserves
|
1,704 | 314 | 361 | 134 | 2,513 | |||||||||||||||||||
Percentage of Total Proved Reserves
|
27 | % | 23 | % | 50 | % | 51 | % | 31 | % | ||||||||||||||
The following table compares the December 31, 2003 PUDs to the December 31, 2002 PUDs by year added. It illustrates the Companys effectiveness in converting PUDs to developed reserves.
2003 | 2002 | % Reduction | ||||||||||
MMBOE | ||||||||||||
Year added
|
||||||||||||
2003
|
328 | | n/a | |||||||||
2002
|
100 | 154 | 35% | |||||||||
2001
|
184 | 340 | 46% | |||||||||
2000
|
58 | 78 | 26% | |||||||||
1999
|
11 | 13 | 15% | |||||||||
Prior years
|
105 | 175 | 40% | |||||||||
Total Proved Undeveloped Reserves
|
786 | 760 | ||||||||||
105
Oil and Gas Reserves (Continued)
Natural Gas | Oil, Condensate and NGLs | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Bcf) | (MMBbls) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. | Canada | Intl | Total | U.S. | Canada | Algeria | Intl | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved Reserves
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2000
|
5,219 | 847 | 27 | 6,093 | 458 | 79 | 364 | 145 | 1,046 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of prior estimates
|
(172 | ) | (17 | ) | | (189 | ) | (23 | ) | (3 | ) | (12 | ) | 15 | (23 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions
|
1,186 | 171 | | 1,357 | 91 | 8 | 44 | 30 | 173 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery
|
(9 | ) | 2 | | (7 | ) | (5 | ) | 9 | | | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases in place
|
2 | 407 | 146 | 555 | 1 | 30 | | 33 | 64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales in place
|
(5 | ) | (48 | ) | (26 | ) | (79 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | | (45 | ) | (47 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Production
|
(573 | ) | (121 | ) | (1 | ) | (695 | ) | (48 | ) | (14 | ) | (9 | ) | (14 | ) | (85 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2001
|
5,648 | 1,241 | 146 | 7,035 | 473 | 108 | 387 | 164 | 1,132 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of prior estimates
|
78 | (42 | ) | (2 | ) | 34 | 33 | (15 | ) | 5 | (52 | ) | (29 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions
|
445 | 303 | | 748 | 51 | 8 | 3 | | 62 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery
|
(6 | ) | | | (6 | ) | 8 | | | | 8 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases in place
|
86 | 1 | | 87 | 60 | | | 13 | 73 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales in place
|
(53 | ) | (25 | ) | | (78 | ) | (2 | ) | (24 | ) | | | (26 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Production
|
(505 | ) | (135 | ) | | (640 | ) | (45 | ) | (13 | ) | (23 | ) | (8 | ) | (89 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002
|
5,693 | 1,343 | 144 | 7,180 | 578 | 64 | 372 | 117 | 1,131 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revisions of prior estimates
|
(197 | ) | 57 | | (140 | ) | 14 | 2 | 3 | | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other
additions
|
982 | 221 | | 1,203 | 55 | 4 | 5 | | 64 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Improved recovery
|
18 | 2 | | 20 | 72 | 2 | | | 74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases in place
|
115 | 48 | | 163 | 27 | | | | 27 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales in place
|
(21 | ) | (38 | ) | | (59 | ) | (4 | ) | | | | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Production
|
(503 | ) | (140 | ) | | (643 | ) | (51 | ) | (7 | ) | (19 | ) | (8 | ) | (85 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
6,087 | 1,493 | 144 | 7,724 | 691 | 65 | 361 | 109 | 1,226 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved Developed Reserves
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2000
|
4,424 | 720 | 16 | 5,160 | 355 | 59 | 98 | 85 | 597 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2001
|
4,247 | 1,028 | | 5,275 | 321 | 79 | 154 | 72 | 626 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002
|
4,299 | 995 | | 5,294 | 377 | 46 | 191 | 72 | 686 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
4,725 | 1,164 | | 5,889 | 451 | 48 | 182 | 65 | 746 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2000
|
795 | 127 | 11 | 933 | 103 | 20 | 266 | 60 | 449 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2001
|
1,401 | 213 | 146 | 1,760 | 152 | 29 | 233 | 92 | 506 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002
|
1,394 | 348 | 144 | 1,886 | 201 | 18 | 181 | 45 | 445 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
1,362 | 329 | 144 | 1,835 | 240 | 17 | 179 | 44 | 480 |
106
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Oil and Gas Reserves (Continued)
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||
(MMBOE) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other | ||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. | Canada | Algeria | Intl | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Proved Reserves
|
||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2000
|
1,327 | 220 | 364 | 150 | 2,061 | |||||||||||||||
Revisions of prior estimates
|
(52 | ) | (6 | ) | (12 | ) | 15 | (55 | ) | |||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions
|
290 | 36 | 44 | 30 | 400 | |||||||||||||||
Improved recovery
|
(6 | ) | 9 | | | 3 | ||||||||||||||
Purchases in place
|
1 | 99 | | 57 | 157 | |||||||||||||||
Sales in place
|
(1 | ) | (9 | ) | | (50 | ) | (60 | ) | |||||||||||
Production
|
(144 | ) | (34 | ) | (9 | ) | (14 | ) | (201 | ) | ||||||||||
December 31, 2001
|
1,415 | 315 | 387 | 188 | 2,305 | |||||||||||||||
Revisions of prior estimates
|
46 | (23 | ) | 5 | (51 | ) | (23 | ) | ||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other additions
|
124 | 59 | 3 | | 186 | |||||||||||||||
Improved recovery
|
8 | | | | 8 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases in place
|
74 | | | 13 | 87 | |||||||||||||||
Sales in place
|
(11 | ) | (28 | ) | | | (39 | ) | ||||||||||||
Production
|
(130 | ) | (35 | ) | (23 | ) | (8 | ) | (196 | ) | ||||||||||
December 31, 2002
|
1,526 | 288 | 372 | 142 | 2,328 | |||||||||||||||
Revisions of prior estimates
|
(19 | ) | 11 | 3 | | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||
Extensions, discoveries and other
additions
|
219 | 41 | 5 | | 265 | |||||||||||||||
Improved recovery
|
75 | 2 | | | 77 | |||||||||||||||
Purchases in place
|
46 | 8 | | | 54 | |||||||||||||||
Sales in place
|
(8 | ) | (6 | ) | | | (14 | ) | ||||||||||||
Production
|
(135 | ) | (30 | ) | (19 | ) | (8 | ) | (192 | ) | ||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
1,704 | 314 | 361 | 134 | 2,513 | |||||||||||||||
Proved Developed Reserves
|
||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2000
|
1,092 | 179 | 98 | 88 | 1,457 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2001
|
1,029 | 250 | 154 | 72 | 1,505 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002
|
1,093 | 212 | 191 | 72 | 1,568 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
1,238 | 242 | 182 | 65 | 1,727 | |||||||||||||||
Proved Undeveloped Reserves
|
||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2000
|
235 | 41 | 266 | 62 | 604 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2001
|
386 | 65 | 233 | 116 | 800 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002
|
433 | 76 | 181 | 70 | 760 | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2003
|
466 | 72 | 179 | 69 | 786 |
107
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
Estimates of future net cash flows from proved reserves of gas, oil, condensate and NGLs were made in accordance with SFAS No. 69, Disclosures about Oil and Gas Producing Activities. The amounts were prepared by the Companys engineers and are shown in the following table. The estimates are based on prices at year-end. Gas, oil, condensate and NGLs prices are escalated only for fixed and determinable amounts under provisions in some contracts. Estimated future cash inflows are reduced by estimated future development, production, abandonment and dismantlement costs based on year-end cost levels, assuming continuation of existing economic conditions, and by estimated future income tax expense. Income tax expense, both U.S. and foreign, is calculated by applying the existing statutory tax rates, including any known future changes, to the pretax net cash flows giving effect to any permanent differences and reduced by the applicable tax basis. The effect of tax credits is considered in determining the income tax expense.
108
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
United States
|
||||||||||||
Future cash inflows
|
$ | 51,346 | $ | 36,536 | $ | 19,890 | ||||||
Future production costs
|
11,529 | 8,989 | 6,072 | |||||||||
Future development costs
|
2,796 | 2,142 | 1,759 | |||||||||
Future net cash flows before income taxes
|
37,021 | 25,405 | 12,059 | |||||||||
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash
flows
|
18,258 | 12,695 | 5,805 | |||||||||
Discounted future net cash flows before income
taxes
|
18,763 | 12,710 | 6,254 | |||||||||
Future income taxes, net of 10% annual discount
|
6,267 | 4,113 | 1,764 | |||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net
cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves
|
12,496 | 8,597 | 4,490 | |||||||||
Canada
|
||||||||||||
Future cash inflows
|
9,602 | 6,609 | 4,325 | |||||||||
Future production costs
|
2,548 | 1,478 | 1,165 | |||||||||
Future development costs
|
637 | 516 | 425 | |||||||||
Future net cash flows before income taxes
|
6,417 | 4,615 | 2,735 | |||||||||
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash
flows
|
3,126 | 2,048 | 1,030 | |||||||||
Discounted future net cash flows before income
taxes
|
3,291 | 2,567 | 1,705 | |||||||||
Future income taxes, net of 10% annual discount
|
753 | 821 | 465 | |||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net
cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves
|
2,538 | 1,746 | 1,240 | |||||||||
Algeria
|
||||||||||||
Future cash inflows
|
11,092 | 11,597 | 7,466 | |||||||||
Future production costs
|
1,052 | 1,209 | 1,113 | |||||||||
Future development costs
|
596 | 478 | 313 | |||||||||
Future net cash flows before income taxes
|
9,444 | 9,910 | 6,040 | |||||||||
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash
flows
|
4,735 | 5,127 | 3,089 | |||||||||
Discounted future net cash flows before income
taxes
|
4,709 | 4,783 | 2,951 | |||||||||
Future income taxes, net of 10% annual discount
|
1,718 | 1,747 | 1,109 | |||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net
cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves
|
$ | 2,991 | $ | 3,036 | $ | 1,842 | ||||||
109
Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows Relating to Proved Oil and Gas Reserves (Continued)
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Other International
|
||||||||||||
Future cash inflows
|
$ | 2,680 | $ | 2,933 | $ | 2,242 | ||||||
Future production costs
|
648 | 709 | 537 | |||||||||
Future development costs
|
370 | 432 | 512 | |||||||||
Future net cash flows before income taxes
|
1,662 | 1,792 | 1,193 | |||||||||
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash
flows
|
638 | 747 | 562 | |||||||||
Discounted future net cash flows before income
taxes
|
1,024 | 1,045 | 631 | |||||||||
Future income taxes, net of 10% annual discount
|
266 | 314 | 172 | |||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net
cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves
|
758 | 731 | 459 | |||||||||
Total
|
||||||||||||
Future cash inflows
|
74,720 | 57,675 | 33,923 | |||||||||
Future production costs
|
15,777 | 12,385 | 8,887 | |||||||||
Future development costs
|
4,399 | 3,568 | 3,009 | |||||||||
Future net cash flows before income taxes
|
54,544 | 41,722 | 22,027 | |||||||||
10% annual discount for estimated timing of cash
flows
|
26,757 | 20,617 | 10,486 | |||||||||
Discounted future net cash flows before income
taxes
|
27,787 | 21,105 | 11,541 | |||||||||
Future income taxes, net of 10% annual discount
|
9,004 | 6,995 | 3,510 | |||||||||
Standardized measure of discounted future net
cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves
|
$ | 18,783 | $ | 14,110 | $ | 8,031 | ||||||
Expected future development costs over the next three years to develop PUDs as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:
2004 | 2005 | 2006 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
United States
|
$ | 1,016 | $ | 502 | $ | 217 | ||||||
Canada
|
151 | 176 | 114 | |||||||||
Algeria
|
31 | 70 | 203 | |||||||||
Other International
|
37 | 85 | 36 | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 1,235 | $ | 833 | $ | 570 | ||||||
110
Changes in Standardized Measure of Discounted Future Net Cash Flows
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
United States
|
||||||||||||
Beginning of year
|
$ | 8,597 | $ | 4,490 | $ | 16,213 | ||||||
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net
of production costs
|
(2,707 | ) | (1,769 | ) | (2,778 | ) | ||||||
Net changes in prices and production costs
|
3,492 | 5,935 | (19,309 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
288 | (206 | ) | 183 | ||||||||
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved
recovery, less related costs
|
4,053 | 999 | 624 | |||||||||
Development costs incurred during the period
|
524 | 331 | 337 | |||||||||
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
(616 | ) | 441 | (453 | ) | |||||||
Purchases of minerals in place
|
501 | 532 | 17 | |||||||||
Sales of minerals in place
|
(44 | ) | (82 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||||
Accretion of discount
|
1,271 | 625 | 2,476 | |||||||||
Net change in income taxes
|
(2,154 | ) | (2,349 | ) | 6,782 | |||||||
Other
|
(709 | ) | (350 | ) | 403 | |||||||
End of year
|
12,496 | 8,597 | 4,490 | |||||||||
Canada
|
||||||||||||
Beginning of year
|
1,746 | 1,240 | 2,425 | |||||||||
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net
of production costs
|
(616 | ) | (417 | ) | (580 | ) | ||||||
Net changes in prices and production costs
|
320 | 774 | (3,319 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
(32 | ) | (70 | ) | 2 | |||||||
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved
recovery, less related costs
|
321 | 541 | 279 | |||||||||
Development costs incurred during the period
|
152 | 157 | 101 | |||||||||
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
136 | (259 | ) | (38 | ) | |||||||
Purchases of minerals in place
|
64 | 3 | 593 | |||||||||
Sales of minerals in place
|
(50 | ) | (96 | ) | (56 | ) | ||||||
Accretion of discount
|
257 | 171 | 431 | |||||||||
Net change in income taxes
|
68 | (356 | ) | 1,415 | ||||||||
Other
|
172 | 58 | (13 | ) | ||||||||
End of year
|
2,538 | 1,746 | 1,240 | |||||||||
Algeria
|
||||||||||||
Beginning of year
|
3,036 | 1,842 | 2,076 | |||||||||
Sales and transfers of oil produced, net of
production costs
|
(493 | ) | (533 | ) | (174 | ) | ||||||
Net changes in prices and production costs
|
32 | 2,316 | (554 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
(139 | ) | (314 | ) | | |||||||
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved
recovery, less related costs
|
59 | 85 | 56 | |||||||||
Development costs incurred during the period
|
60 | 122 | 164 | |||||||||
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
20 | | | |||||||||
Accretion of discount
|
478 | 295 | 318 | |||||||||
Net change in income taxes
|
29 | (638 | ) | (1 | ) | |||||||
Other
|
(91 | ) | (139 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||
End of year
|
$ | 2,991 | $ | 3,036 | $ | 1,842 | ||||||
111
2003 | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
millions | ||||||||||||
Other International
|
||||||||||||
Beginning of year
|
$ | 731 | $ | 459 | $ | 691 | ||||||
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net
of production costs
|
(115 | ) | (91 | ) | (113 | ) | ||||||
Net changes in prices and production costs
|
(59 | ) | 757 | (402 | ) | |||||||
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
(5 | ) | 1 | 32 | ||||||||
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved
recovery, less related costs
|
| | 109 | |||||||||
Development costs incurred during the period
|
64 | 88 | 87 | |||||||||
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
19 | (520 | ) | 75 | ||||||||
Purchases of minerals in place
|
| 117 | 188 | |||||||||
Sales of minerals in place
|
| | (199 | ) | ||||||||
Accretion of discount
|
105 | 64 | 90 | |||||||||
Net change in income taxes
|
48 | (142 | ) | 32 | ||||||||
Other
|
(30 | ) | (2 | ) | (131 | ) | ||||||
End of year
|
758 | 731 | 459 | |||||||||
Total
|
||||||||||||
Beginning of year
|
14,110 | 8,031 | 21,405 | |||||||||
Sales and transfers of oil and gas produced, net
of production costs
|
(3,931 | ) | (2,810 | ) | (3,645 | ) | ||||||
Net changes in prices and production costs
|
3,785 | 9,782 | (23,584 | ) | ||||||||
Changes in estimated future development costs
|
112 | (589 | ) | 217 | ||||||||
Extensions, discoveries, additions and improved
recovery, less related costs
|
4,433 | 1,625 | 1,068 | |||||||||
Development costs incurred during the period
|
800 | 698 | 689 | |||||||||
Revisions of previous quantity estimates
|
(441 | ) | (338 | ) | (416 | ) | ||||||
Purchases of minerals in place
|
565 | 652 | 798 | |||||||||
Sales of minerals in place
|
(94 | ) | (178 | ) | (260 | ) | ||||||
Accretion of discount
|
2,111 | 1,155 | 3,315 | |||||||||
Net change in income taxes
|
(2,009 | ) | (3,485 | ) | 8,228 | |||||||
Other
|
(658 | ) | (433 | ) | 216 | |||||||
End of year
|
$ | 18,783 | $ | 14,110 | $ | 8,031 | ||||||
112
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
Quarterly Financial Data
The following table shows summary quarterly financial data for 2003 and 2002. Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. See Note 1.
First | Second | Third | Fourth | |||||||||||||
millions except per share amounts | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | ||||||||||||
2003
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 1,255 | $ | 1,249 | $ | 1,340 | $ | 1,278 | ||||||||
Operating income, pretax
|
621 | 552 | 540 | 495 | ||||||||||||
Net income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
$ | 372 | $ | 302 | $ | 276 | $ | 295 | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders
before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
$ | 371 | $ | 301 | $ | 274 | $ | 294 | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders
|
$ | 418 | $ | 301 | $ | 274 | $ | 294 | ||||||||
EPS - before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle - basic
|
$ | 1.49 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 1.09 | $ | 1.18 | ||||||||
EPS - before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle - diluted
|
$ | 1.45 | $ | 1.20 | $ | 1.09 | $ | 1.17 | ||||||||
EPS - basic
|
$ | 1.68 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 1.09 | $ | 1.18 | ||||||||
EPS - diluted
|
$ | 1.63 | $ | 1.20 | $ | 1.09 | $ | 1.17 | ||||||||
Average number common shares outstanding - basic
|
249 | 250 | 250 | 250 | ||||||||||||
Average number common shares outstanding - diluted
|
258 | 252 | 251 | 252 | ||||||||||||
2002
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 790 | $ | 1,002 | $ | 938 | $ | 1,115 | ||||||||
Operating income, pretax
|
204 | 364 | 350 | 492 | ||||||||||||
Net income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
$ | 89 | $ | 241 | $ | 190 | $ | 311 | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders
before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
$ | 88 | $ | 239 | $ | 189 | $ | 309 | ||||||||
Net income available to common stockholders
|
$ | 88 | $ | 239 | $ | 189 | $ | 309 | ||||||||
EPS - before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle - basic
|
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 1.25 | ||||||||
EPS - before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle - diluted
|
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.93 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 1.21 | ||||||||
EPS - basic
|
$ | 0.35 | $ | 0.96 | $ | 0.76 | $ | 1.25 | ||||||||
EPS - diluted
|
$ | 0.34 | $ | 0.93 | $ | 0.74 | $ | 1.21 | ||||||||
Average number common shares outstanding - basic
|
248 | 248 | 249 | 249 | ||||||||||||
Average number common shares outstanding - diluted
|
263 | 259 | 258 | 258 |
113
Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
None.
Item 9a. | Controls and Procedures |
Anadarkos Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Certifying Officers) performed an evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuers management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
PART III
Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant |
See Anadarko Board of Directors, Committees of the Board and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Proxy Statement (Proxy Statement), for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation to be held May 6, 2004 (to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission prior to April 29, 2004) which is incorporated herein by reference.
See list of Executive Officers of the Registrant appearing under Item 4 of this Form 10-K.
The Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer (Code of Ethics) can be found on the Companys internet website located at www.anadarko.com. If the Company amends the Code of Ethics or grants a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from the Code of Ethics, the Company intends to disclose the information on its internet website. This information will remain on the website for at least 12 months.
Item 11. | Executive Compensation |
See Board of Directors and Executive Compensation in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
See Stock Ownership in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
See Equity Compensation Plan Table appearing under Item 5 of this Form 10-K.
Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions |
See Board of Directors and Transactions with Management in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services |
See Audit Committee Report in the Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
114
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report or incorporated by reference:
(1) | The consolidated financial statements of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation are listed on the Index to this report, page 53. | |
(2) | Exhibits not incorporated by reference to a prior filing are designated by an asterisk (*) and are filed herewith; all exhibits not so designated are incorporated herein by reference to a prior filing as indicated. |
Exhibit | Originally Filed | File | ||||||||
Number | Description | as Exhibit | Number | |||||||
2(a)
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of April 2, 2000, among Anadarko, Subcorp and Anadarko Holding Company | 2.1 to Form 8-K dated April 2, 2000 | 1-8968 | |||||||
3(a)
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, dated August 28, 1986 | 4(a) to Form S-3 dated May 9, 2001 | 333-60496 | |||||||
*(b)
|
By-laws of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, as amended |
|||||||||
(c)
|
Certificate of Amendment of Anadarkos Restated Certificate of Incorporation | 4.1 to Form 8-K dated July 28, 2000 | 1-8968 | |||||||
4(a)
|
Certificate of Designation of 5.46% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B |
4(a) to Form 8-K dated May 6, 1998 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(b)
|
Rights Agreement, dated as of October 29,
1998, between Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and The Chase Manhattan Bank |
4.1 to Form 8-A dated October 30, 1998 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(c)
|
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement, dated
as of April 2, 2000 between Anadarko and the Rights Agent |
2.4 to Form 8-K dated April 2, 2000 | 1-8968 | |||||||
Director and Executive Compensation Plans and Arrangements | ||||||||||
10(b)
|
(i) | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1988 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors | 19(b) to Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 1988 | 1-8968 | ||||||
(ii) |
Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Amended and Restated 1988 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors |
99 Attachment A to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1993 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(iii) |
Amendment to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1988 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors |
10(b)(vii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1997 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(iv) | Second Amendment to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1988 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors | 10(b)(viii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1997 | 1-8968 | |||||||
*
|
(v) | Third Amendment to 1988 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors | ||||||||
(vi) | 1998 Director Stock Plan of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation, effective January 30, 1998 | 99 Attachment A to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1997 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(vii) | Form of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1998 Director Stock Plan Stock Option Agreement | 10(b)(iii) to Form 10-Q for quarter ended June 30, 2003 | 1-8968 |
115
Exhibit | Originally Filed | File | ||||||||
Number | Description | as Exhibit | Number | |||||||
10(b)
|
(viii) | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Participating Affiliates and Subsidiaries Annual Override Pool Bonus Plan, as amended October 6, 1986 | 19(c)(ix) to Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 1986 | 1-8968 | ||||||
(ix) | Second Amendment to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Participating Affiliates and Subsidiaries Annual Override Pool Bonus Plan | 10(b)(ii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1987 | 1-8968 | |||||||
*
|
(x) | Second Amendment to the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Annual Override Pool Bonus Plan, as amended January 1, 1988 | ||||||||
(xi) | Restatement of the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1987 Stock Option Plan (and Related Agreement) | Post Effective Amendment No. 1 to Forms S-8 and S-3, Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1987 Stock Option Plan | 33-22134 | |||||||
(xii) | First Amendment to Restatement of the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1987 Stock Option Plan | 10(b)(xii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1997 | 1-8968 | |||||||
*
|
(xiii) | Second Amendment to Restatement of the 1987 Stock Option Plan | ||||||||
(xiv) | 1993 Stock Incentive Plan | 10(b)(xii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1993 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xv) | First Amendment to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1993 Stock Incentive Plans | 99 Attachment A to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1996 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xvi) | Second Amendment to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1993 Stock Incentive Plans | 10(b)(xv) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1997 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xvii) | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1993 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement | 10(a) to Form 10-Q for quarter ended March 31, 1996 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xviii) | Form of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1993 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement | 10(b)(xvii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1997 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xix) |
Form of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1993 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement |
10(b)(xviii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1997 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xx) | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan | 99 Attachment A to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1998 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxi) |
Amendment to 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, as of July 1, 2000 |
10(b)(xxii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2000 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxii) | Form of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement | 10(b)(xxiii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1999 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxiii) | Form of Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement | 10(b)(xxiv) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1999 | 1-8968 |
116
Exhibit | Originally Filed | File | ||||||||
Number | Description | as Exhibit | Number | |||||||
*10(b)
|
(xxiv) | The Approved UK Sub-Plan of the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan | ||||||||
(xxv) | Annual Incentive Bonus Plan | 10(b)(xiii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1993 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxvi) | First Amendment to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Annual Incentive Bonus Plan | 99 Attachment B to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1998 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxvii) | Second Amendment to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Annual Incentive Bonus Plan | 10(b)(xxii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2002 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxviii) | Key Employee Change of Control Contract | 10(b)(xxii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1997 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxix) | First Amendment to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Key Employee Change of Control Contract | 10(b) to Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 2000 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxx) | Form of Amendment to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Key Employee Change of Control Contract |
10(b)(ii) to Form 10-Q for quarter ended June 30, 2003 |
1-8968 | |||||||
*
|
(xxxi) | Key Employee Change of Control Contract James T. Hackett | ||||||||
*
|
(xxxii) | Employment Agreement James T. Hackett | ||||||||
*
|
(xxxiii) | Retirement Benefit Agreement Robert J. Allison, Jr. | ||||||||
*
|
(xxxiv) | Agreement, dated February 16, 2004 | ||||||||
(xxxv) | Anadarko Retirement Restoration Plan, effective January 1, 1995 | 10(b)(xix) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1995 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxxvi) | Anadarko Savings Restoration Plan, effective January 1, 1995 | 10(b)(xx) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1995 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxxvii) | Amendment to Amended and Restated Anadarko Savings Restoration Plan | 10(b)(xxxi) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1997 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxxviii) | Plan Agreement for the Management Life Insurance Plan between Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and each Eligible Employee, effective July 1, 1995 | 10(b)(xxi) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1995 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xxxix) | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Estate Enhancement Program | 10(b)(xxxiv) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1998 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xl) | Estate Enhancement Program Agreement between Anadarko Petroleum Corporation and Eligible Executives | 10(b)(xxxv) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1998 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xli) | Estate Enhancement Program Agreements effective November 29, 2000 | 10(b)(xxxxii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2000 | 1-8968 |
117
Exhibit | Originally Filed | File | ||||||||
Number | Description | as Exhibit | Number | |||||||
10(b)
|
(xlii) | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Management Life Insurance Plan | 10(b)(xxxii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2002 | 1-8968 | ||||||
*
|
(xliii) | First Amendment to Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Management Life Insurance Plan | ||||||||
(xliv) | Management Disability Plan Plan Summary | 10(b)(xxxiii) to Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 2002 | 1-8968 | |||||||
(xlv) | Termination Agreement and Release of All Claims |
10(b)(i) to Form 10-Q for quarter ended June 30, 2003 |
1-8968 | |||||||
(xlvi) | Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Officer Severance Plan |
10(b)(iv) to Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 2003 |
1-8968 | |||||||
(xlvii) | Form of Termination Agreement and Release of All Claims Under Officer Severance Plan |
10(b)(v) to Form 10-Q for quarter ended September 30, 2003 |
1-8968 | |||||||
*
|
(xlviii) | Letter of Agreement for Medical/Dental Benefits | ||||||||
*12
|
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends | |||||||||
*13
|
Portions of the Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 2003 Annual Report to Stockholders | |||||||||
*21
|
List of Significant Subsidiaries | |||||||||
*23.1
|
Consent of KPMG LLP | |||||||||
*23.2
|
Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. | |||||||||
*24
|
Power of Attorney | |||||||||
*31
|
Rule 13a14(a)/15d14(a) Certifications | |||||||||
*32
|
Section 1350 Certifications | |||||||||
*99.1
|
Report of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. |
The total amount of securities of the registrant authorized under any instrument with respect to long-term debt not filed as an exhibit does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. The registrant agrees, upon request of the Securities and Exchange Commission, to furnish copies of any or all of such instruments to the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
A report on Form 8-K dated October 31, 2003 was furnished. The event was reported under Item 9 Regulation FD Disclosure and Item 12 Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
118
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ANADARKO PETROLEUM CORPORATION |
March 3, 2004
By: | /s/ JAMES R. LARSON |
|
|
(James R. Larson, Senior Vice | |
President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the securities exchange act of 1934, this Report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 3, 2004.
Name and Signature | Title | |||
(i)
|
Principal executive officer:* | |||
JAMES T. HACKETT (James T. Hackett) |
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|||
(ii)
|
Principal financial officer:* | |||
JAMES R. LARSON (James R. Larson) |
Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief
Financial Officer
|
|||
(iii)
|
Principal accounting officer:* | |||
DIANE L. DICKEY (Diane L. Dickey) |
Vice President and Controller
|
|||
(iv)
|
Directors:* | |||
ROBERT J. ALLISON, JR. CONRAD P. ALBERT LARRY BARCUS JAMES L. BRYAN JOHN R. BUTLER, JR. PRESTON M. GEREN III JOHN R. GORDON JAMES T. HACKETT JOHN W. PODUSKA, SR., PH.D. |
||||
* Signed on behalf of each of these persons and on his own behalf: | ||||
By |
/s/ JAMES R. LARSON (James R. Larson, Attorney-in-Fact) |
119