Back to GetFilings.com




UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ___________ TO ___________

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 000-19580

T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

DELAWARE 76-0697390
(State or Other Jurisdiction (IRS Employer
of Incorporation or Organization) Identification No.)

13111 NORTHWEST FREEWAY, SUITE 500, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77040
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code): (713) 996-4110


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No[X]

At August 1, 2003, the registrant had 10,581,669 shares of common stock
outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-Q

PART I



Item Page

1. Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2003 and
December 31, 2002........................................... 1
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and
Six Months Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002..................... 2
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months
Ended June 30, 2003 and 2002................................ 3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.................... 4

2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations..................................... 8

3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk......... 18

4. Controls and Procedures............................................ 18

PART II

1. Legal Proceedings.................................................. 19

2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds ......................... 19

3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.................................... 19

4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders................ 19

5. Other Information ................................................. 19

6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K .................................. 19



i

T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR SHARE AMOUNTS)



JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
2003 2002
---- ----

(UNAUDITED)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents........................................... $ 203 $ 857
Accounts receivable - trade, net.................................... 24,031 22,519
Inventories......................................................... 19,105 18,430
Notes receivable, current portion................................... 645 696
Deferred income taxes............................................... 2,853 2,595
Prepaids and other current assets................................... 3,731 5,262
---------- ----------
Total current assets........................................... 50,568 50,359

Property and equipment, net......................................... 29,119 29,927
Notes receivable, less current portion.............................. 3,392 5,053
Goodwill, net....................................................... 96,756 96,986
Other intangible assets, net........................................ 2,995 3,663
Other assets........................................................ 500 611
---------- ----------

Total assets........................................................ $ 183,330 $ 186,599
========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable - trade............................................ $ 12,184 $ 14,433
Accrued expenses and other.......................................... 7,330 7,781
Current maturities of long-term debt................................ 3,482 3,463
---------- ----------
Total current liabilities...................................... 22,996 25,677

Long-term debt, less current maturities............................. 25,433 26,441
Other long-term liabilities......................................... 984 1,108
Deferred income taxes............................................... 2,857 2,764

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued or outstanding................. --- ---
Common stock, $.001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized,
10,581,669 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2003
and December 31, 2002 ...................................... 11 11
Warrants, 517,862 and 3,489,079 issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively ......... 853 938
Additional paid-in capital..................................... 122,927 122,833
Retained earnings.............................................. 7,269 6,827
---------- ----------
Total stockholders' equity.................................. 131,060 130,609
---------- ----------

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.......................... $ 183,330 $ 186,599
========== ==========


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.


1

T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)



THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
2003 2002 2003 2002
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Revenues:
Products........................................ $ 28,080 $ 28,753 $ 54,665 $ 56,699
Services........................................ 9,370 8,483 18,664 16,947
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
37,450 37,236 73,329 73,646
Cost of revenues:
Products........................................ 20,826 20,649 40,580 41,258
Services........................................ 6,417 5,625 12,960 10,855
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
27,243 26,274 53,540 52,113

Gross profit........................................ 10,207 10,962 19,789 21,533

Selling, general and administrative expenses........ 8,302 7,870 15,862 15,439
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Income from operations.............................. 1,905 3,092 3,927 6,094

Interest expense.................................... 778 871 1,552 1,851

Interest income..................................... 62 171 118 351

Write-down of acquired note receivable.............. --- --- 1,703 ---

Other (income) expense, net......................... 4 (29) (7) (40)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Income before provision for income taxes............ 1,185 2,421 797 4,634

Provision for income taxes.......................... 423 1,019 355 1,925
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------

Net income.......................................... $ 762 $ 1,402 $ 442 $ 2,709
============ ============ ============ ============

Earnings per common share:

Basic........................................... $ .07 $ .13 $ .04 $ .27
============ ============ ============ ============
Diluted......................................... $ .07 $ .13 $ .04 $ .27
============ ============ ============ ============

Weighted average common shares outstanding:

Basic........................................... 10,582 10,582 10,582 10,107
============ ============ ============ ============
Diluted......................................... 10,586 10,582 10,583 10,107
============ ============ ============ ============


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.


2

T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(IN THOUSANDS)



SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,
2003 2002
---------- ----------

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income ................................................................ $ 442 $ 2,709
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Bad debt expense...................................................... 160 166
Depreciation and amortization......................................... 2,087 1,857
Amortization of deferred loan costs................................... 448 422
Write-down of acquired note receivable................................ 1,703 ---
Deferred taxes........................................................ (165) 910
Amortization of stock compensation.................................... 9 13
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable - trade......................................... (1,672) 4,535
Inventories......................................................... (697) 930
Prepaids and other current assets................................... 1,583 (148)
Notes receivable.................................................... 138 (101)
Other assets........................................................ 112 (18)
Accounts payable - trade............................................ (2,249) (5,261)
Accrued expenses and other.......................................... (528) (3,608)
---------- ----------

Net cash provided by operating activities.................................. 1,371 2,406
---------- ----------

Cash flows from investing activities:

Purchases of property and equipment..................................... (953) (2,142)
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment........................... 37 95
---------- ----------


Net cash used in investing activities...................................... (916) (2,047)
---------- ----------

Cash flows from financing activities:

Proceeds from long-term debt........................................... 748 394
Net repayments under revolving credit facility......................... --- (10,748)
Payments on long-term debt............................................. (1,737) (3,168)
Debt financing costs................................................... (120) (6)
Proceeds from sales of common stock.................................... --- 10,000
---------- ----------

Net cash used in financing activities...................................... (1,109) (3,528)
---------- ----------

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents.................................. (654) (3,169)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year............................... 857 5,395
---------- ----------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period................................... $ 203 $ 2,226
========== ==========


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements.


3

T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include
all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
adjustments) considered necessary for fair presentation have been included.
These financial statements include the accounts of T-3 Energy Services, Inc.,
and subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have
been eliminated in consolidation. Operating results for the six months ended
June 30, 2003, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be
expected for the year ended December 31, 2003. For further information, refer to
the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the
Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior-year amounts to conform
them to the current-year presentation.

Stock-Based Compensation

In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No.
123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation to provide alternative methods of
transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting
for stock-based employee compensation. As permitted under SFAS No. 123, the
Company uses the intrinsic value method of accounting established by Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, to
account for its stock-based compensation programs. Accordingly, no compensation
expense is recognized when the exercise price of an employee stock option is
equal to the common share market price on the grant date. The following
illustrates the pro forma effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per
share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS
No 123:



THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
2003 2002 2003 2002
----- ------ ----- ------

Net income, as reported............. $ 762 $1,402 $ 442 $2,709
Total stock-based employee
compensation expense.............. (75) (50) (155) (115)
----- ------ ----- ------
Net income, as adjusted............. $ 687 $1,352 $ 287 $2,594

Basic EPS:
As reported....................... $ .07 $ .13 $ .04 $ .27
As adjusted....................... $ .07 $ .13 $ .03 $ .26

Diluted EPS:
As reported....................... $ .07 $ .13 $ .04 $ .27
As adjusted....................... $ .06 $ .13 $ .03 $ .26


For the purpose of estimating the fair value disclosures above, the fair
value of each stock option has been estimated on the grant date with a
Black-Scholes option pricing model. The following assumptions for the three
months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 were computed on a weighted average basis:
risk-free interest rate of 3.87% and 4.92%, expected volatility of 43.21% and
34.50%, expected life of 4 years for each period and no expected dividends. The
following assumptions for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 were
computed on a weighted average basis: risk-free interest rate of 3.80% and
4.92%, expected volatility of 43.44% and 34.50%, expected life of 4 years for
each period and no expected dividends. The effects of applying SFAS No. 123 may
not be indicative of future amounts since additional future awards are
anticipated and the estimation of values involves subjective assumptions which
may vary materially as a result of actual events.


4

Write-down of Acquired Note Receivable

Prior to the merger of the Company and Industrial Holdings, Inc. (IHI), IHI
sold a subsidiary, Beaird Industries Inc., to an entity controlled by Don Carlin
and Robert Cone, and IHI received a $3.5 million promissory note from the former
subsidiary as the purchase price. Mr. Carlin is a former director, and Mr. Cone
is a former executive officer and director of the Company. During the first
quarter of 2003, the Company was informed by the payor of the note of its
inability to make timely interest payments and to continue as a going concern
unless it restructures its debt obligations. The Company is negotiating revised
terms with the payor in an effort to maximize the value and collection of this
note. During the first quarter of 2003, the Company reserved approximately 50%
of the note, because management believes that the note's net realizable value is
approximately $1.7 million.

2. INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of the following (dollars in thousands):



JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
2003 2002
-------- -----------

Raw materials......................... $ 3,678 $ 4,115
Work in process....................... 3,625 3,357
Finished goods and component parts.... 11,802 10,958
-------- --------
$ 19,105 $ 18,430
======== ========


3. NEWLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation (FIN) No. 46,
"Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." FIN No. 46 requires
unconsolidated variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary
beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse the risks and rewards
of ownership among their owners and other parties involved. The provisions of
FIN No. 46 are applicable immediately to all variable interest entities created
after January 31, 2003 and variable interest entities in which an enterprise
obtains an interest in after that date, and for variable interest entities
created before this date, the provisions are effective July 1, 2003. The Company
adopted this standard in 2003 and there has been no impact on its financial
disclosures, financial condition and results of operations.

4. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic net income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted
net income per common share is the same as basic but includes dilutive stock
options and warrants using the treasury stock method.

The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators of the basic
and diluted per common share computations for net income for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, as follows (in thousands except per share
data):


5



THREE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,
2003 2002
------- -------

Numerator:
Net income........................................... $ 762 $ 1,402
======= =======

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding -- basic.. 10,582 10,582
Shares for dilutive stock options.................... 4 --
------- -------
Weighted average common shares outstanding and
Assumed conversions -- diluted..................... 10,586 10,582
======= =======

Basic earnings per common share ........................ $ .07 $ .13
Diluted earnings per common share ...................... $ .07 $ .13


For the three months ended June 30, 2003, there were 580,329 options and
517,862 warrants that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings
per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. For the three
months ended June 30, 2002, there were 525,779 options and 3,489,079 warrants
that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because
their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. The Company's Class B, C and D
warrants totaling 2,971,217 warrants expired on January 14, 2003.



SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30,

2003 2002
------- -------
Numerator:
Net income........................................... $ 442 $ 2,709
======= =======

Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding -- basic.. 10,582 10,107
Shares for dilutive stock options.................... 1 --
------- -------
Weighted average common shares outstanding and
Assumed conversions -- diluted..................... 10,583 10,107
======= =======

Basic earnings per common share ........................ $ .04 $ .27
Diluted earnings per common share ...................... $ .04 $ .27


For the six months ended June 30, 2003, there were 580,329 options and
517,862 warrants that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings
per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. For the six
months ended June 30, 2002, there were 525,779 options and 3,489,079 warrants
that were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because
their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

5. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS:

The Company's determination of reportable segments considers the strategic
operating units under which the Company sells different types of products and
services to various customers.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those of the
Company. The Company evaluates performance based on income from operations
excluding certain corporate costs not allocated to the segments. Inter-segment
revenues are not material. Substantially all revenues are from domestic sources
and all assets are held in the United States. Segment information for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:


6



(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
PRESSURE
CONTROL PRODUCTS DISTRIBUTION CORPORATE CONSOLIDATED
-------- -------- ------------ --------- ------------

THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30:
2003
Revenues ............................ $ 19,197 $ 8,412 $ 9,841 $ --- $ 37,450
Depreciation and amortization........ 568 232 88 178 1,066
Income (loss) from operations........ 3,731 (160) 439 (2,105) 1,905
Capital expenditures................. 101 39 15 227 382
2002
Revenues ............................ $ 17,770 $ 10,534 $ 8,932 $ --- $ 37,236
Depreciation and amortization........ 487 239 79 99 904
Income (loss) from operations........ 3,665 203 438 (1,214) 3,092
Capital expenditures................. 513 202 80 397 1,192





(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
PRESSURE
CONTROL PRODUCTS DISTRIBUTION CORPORATE CONSOLIDATED
-------- -------- ------------ --------- ------------

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30:
2003
Revenues ............................ $ 36,302 $ 17,420 $ 19,607 $ --- $ 73,329
Depreciation and amortization........ 1,114 453 174 346 2,087
Income (loss) from operations........ 6,530 (40) 970 (3,533) 3,927
Capital expenditures................. 234 217 89 413 953
2002
Revenues ............................ $ 34,234 $ 20,956 $ 18,456 $ --- $ 73,646
Depreciation and amortization........ 1,043 464 169 181 1,857
Income (loss) from operations........ 6,674 680 1,073 (2,333) 6,094
Capital expenditures................. 714 505 89 834 2,142



7

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

GENERAL

The following discussion of our historical results of operations and
financial condition for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002 should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes
included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and our financial statements and related
management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2002 included in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

We operate in three segments. The Pressure Control segment manufactures,
remanufactures and repairs high pressure, severe service products, including
valves, chokes, actuators, blowout preventers, manifolds and wellhead equipment.
The Products segment manufactures and repairs pumps, electric motors and
generators, manufactures specialty bolts and fasteners, fabricates equipment and
components for use in the exploration and production of oil and gas and provides
specialty machining for the repair and remanufacture of natural gas and diesel
engines. The Distribution segment engages in the specialty distribution of
pipes, valves, stud bolts, gaskets and other ancillary products. Our products
and services are sold primarily to customers in the upstream and downstream oil
and gas industry located in the Texas and Louisiana Gulf Coast region.

The following table sets forth certain statistics that are reflective of
recent historical market conditions:



WTI Henry Hub United States Gulf of Mexico
Quarter Ended: Oil (1) Gas (2) Rig Count (3) Rig Count (4)
- -------------- ------- --------- ------------- --------------

June 30, 2002............. $26.25 $ 3.26 806 103

September 30, 2002........ $28.34 $ 3.20 853 109

December 31, 2002......... $27.83 $ 4.33 847 108

March 31, 2003............ $34.10 $ 5.91 901 104

June 30, 2003............. $28.98 $ 5.74 1,028 104


- --------------

(1) Source: Average price per barrel for the quarter calculated by T-3
using daily data published by the United States Department of Energy on
its website, www.eia.doe.gov.

(2) Source: Average price per MM/BTU for the quarter calculated by T-3
using daily data published on www.oilnergy.com.

(3) Source: Average United States Rig Count for the quarter calculated by
T-3 using weekly data published by Baker Hughes Incorporated.

(4) Source: Average Gulf of Mexico Rig Count for the quarter calculated by
T-3 using weekly data published by Baker Hughes Incorporated.

Demand for our products and services is cyclical and dependent upon
activity in the oil and gas industry and the profitability, cash flow and
willingness of oil and gas companies and drilling contractors to spend capital
on the exploration, development and production of oil and gas reserves,
primarily in the Gulf of Mexico and the United States regions where our products
and services are primarily sold. Even though the level of exploration and
production is our primary driver, especially in the Gulf of Mexico, it is highly
sensitive to current and projected oil and natural gas prices, which have
historically been characterized by significant volatility. Over the last several
years, the United States drilling rig count has fluctuated due to world economic
and political trends that influence the supply and demand for energy, the price
of oil and natural gas and the level of exploration and drilling for those
commodities. The United States drilling rig count stabilized in the second
quarter of 2002, increased slightly, and then remained stable throughout the
remainder of 2002, before increasing steadily throughout the first half of 2003.
However, the average Gulf of Mexico rig count for the second quarter of 2003 was
only slightly above the average rig count for the same period in 2002 and had
declined slightly from higher average levels in late 2002.


8

The level of revenue improvement for the remainder of 2003 will continue to
be heavily dependent upon the timing and strength of the recovery in the United
States and Gulf of Mexico markets and our gains in market share outside the Gulf
of Mexico. The speed and extent of any recovery in these markets is difficult to
predict in light of continued economic uncertainty. Many external factors,
including world economic and political conditions, quotas established by OPEC
(Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries), and weather conditions, will
influence the recovery and continued strength of the industry. Based on our
assessment of external factors and our current levels of inquiry and quotation,
we believe that continuing price and general economic uncertainty will cause
near-term activity levels to remain flat for the rest of 2003.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make certain
estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and accompanying notes. Our estimation process generally relates to
potential bad debts, obsolete and slow moving inventory, and the valuation of
long-lived and intangible assets. Our estimates are based on historical
experience and on our future expectations that we believe to be reasonable under
the circumstances. The combination of these factors result in the amounts shown
as carrying values of assets and liabilities in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from our current estimates and
those differences may be material.

These estimates may change as new events occur, as additional information
is obtained and as our operating environment changes. Other than a change in our
estimate of the collectibility of a note receivable, as discussed in Note 1 to
our consolidated financial statements, there have been no material changes or
developments in our evaluation of the accounting estimates and the underlying
assumptions or methodologies that we believe to be Critical Accounting Policies
and Estimates as disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
2002.


9

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth certain operating statement data for each of
the Company's segments for each of the periods presented (in thousands):



THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
2003 2002 2003 2002
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

Revenues:
Pressure Control........................... $ 19,197 $ 17,770 $ 36,302 $ 34,234
Products................................... 8,412 10,534 17,420 20,956
Distribution............................... 9,841 8,932 19,607 18,456
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

37,450 37,236 73,329 73,646
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Cost of revenues:
Pressure Control........................... 12,701 11,249 24,389 21,898
Products................................... 7,255 8,556 14,729 16,949
Distribution............................... 7,287 6,469 14,422 13,266
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

27,243 26,274 53,540 52,113
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Gross profit:
Pressure Control........................... 6,496 6,521 11,913 12,336
Products................................... 1,157 1,978 2,691 4,007
Distribution............................... 2,554 2,463 5,185 5,190
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

10,207 10,962 19,789 21,533
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Selling, general and administrative expenses:

Pressure Control........................... 2,765 2,856 5,383 5,662
Products................................... 1,317 1,775 2,731 3,327
Distribution............................... 2,115 2,025 4,215 4,117
Corporate.................................. 2,105 1,214 3,533 2,333
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

8,302 7,870 15,862 15,439
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Income (loss) from operations:

Pressure Control........................... 3,731 3,665 6,530 6,674
Products................................... (160) 203 (40) 680
Distribution............................... 439 438 970 1,073
Corporate.................................. (2,105) (1,214) (3,533) (2,333)
---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

$ 1,905 $ 3,092 $ 3,927 $ 6,094
========== ========== ========== ==========


Three Months ended June 30, 2003 Compared with Three Months ended June 30, 2002

Revenues. On a consolidated basis, revenues increased $0.2 million, or 1%,
in 2003 compared to 2002. This increase was partially attributable to an
improved United States onshore rig count, increased market penetration for our
pressure control products and services, and increased revenues in the
distribution segment resulting from several large customer projects. These
increases were negatively impacted by continued softness in the Gulf of Mexico
drilling rig activity.

Revenues for the Pressure Control segment increased $1.4 million, or 8%, in
2003 compared to 2002. The increase in revenues was primarily attributable to an
increase in market share for our pressure control products and services and
slight revenue increases associated with the higher United States onshore rig
count. These revenues were partially offset by the continued softness in Gulf of
Mexico drilling rig activity.

Revenues for the Products segment decreased $2.1 million, or 20%, in 2003
compared to 2002. This decrease was primarily attributable to significantly
lower revenues from artificial lift systems and larger fabricated equipment and
components for use in the exploration and production of oil and gas, especially
in the Gulf of Mexico.


10

Revenues for the Distribution segment increased $0.9 million, or 10%, in
2003 compared to 2002 due to several large customer projects. These large
customer projects made up for a slight decline in the volume of smaller items
that typically comprise the revenue base due to the continued softness in
activity in the Gulf of Mexico.

Cost of Revenues. On a consolidated basis, cost of revenues increased $1.0
million, or 4%, in 2003 compared to 2002. Gross profit as a percentage of
revenues was 27% in 2003 compared to 29% in 2002. Gross profit margin was lower
on a consolidated basis in 2003 compared to 2002 because of continued pricing
pressure for our products and services, particularly those sold in the Gulf of
Mexico, and increased insurance and medical costs in 2003 compared to 2002.

Cost of revenues for the Pressure Control segment increased $1.5 million,
or 13%, in 2003 compared to 2002. The increase is primarily a result of the
increase in revenues described above. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues
was 34% in 2003 compared to 37% in 2002. The decrease in gross profit margin was
due to pricing pressure for our products and services, increased insurance and
medical costs and the temporarily higher than normal manufacturing costs of one
of our new manufactured pressure control products. We anticipate that the costs
of manufacturing this new product will decrease in future periods and benefit
our operations.

Cost of revenues for the Products segment decreased $1.3 million, or 15%,
in 2003 compared to 2002. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues was 14% in
2003 compared to 19% in 2002. Gross profit margin decreased primarily as a
result of pricing pressure for our products and services, increased insurance
and medical costs and a change in the revenue mix of products and services sold,
with a greater percentage of 2003 revenues consisting of lower margin products
revenues when compared to higher margin service revenues.

Cost of revenues for the Distribution segment increased $0.8 million, or
13%, in 2003 compared to 2002, primarily due to the increase in revenues in
2003. Gross profit margin as a percentage of revenues was 26% in 2003 compared
to 28% in 2002. Gross profit margin decreased primarily because of pricing
pressure for our products, especially revenues related to the large customer
projects that occurred in 2003.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. On a consolidated basis,
selling, general and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million or 5%, in
2003 compared to 2002. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and
administrative expenses were 22% in 2003 compared to 21% in 2002.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Pressure Control
segment remained relatively constant in 2003 compared to 2002. As a percentage
of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 16% in
2002 to 14% in 2003, primarily due to cost reduction strategies.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Products segment
decreased $0.5 million, or 26%, in 2003 compared to 2002. As a percentage of
revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 17% in
2002 to 16% in 2003, primarily due to cost reduction strategies.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Distribution segment
remained relatively constant in 2003 compared to 2002. As a percentage of
revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 23% in
2002 to 21% in 2003, primarily due to cost reduction strategies. These cost
reductions were partially offset by increased insurance and medical costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Corporate operations
increased $0.9 million, or 73%, in 2003 compared to 2002. This was primarily
attributable to an increase in costs associated with relocation and compensation
expenses incurred for new management, the recognition of severance payments to
former management, the integration of the former IHI operating units into T-3
and legal fees.

Interest Expense. On a consolidated basis, interest expense decreased to
$0.8 million in 2003 from $0.9 million in 2002, primarily as a result of lower
debt levels and interest rates throughout 2003.

Interest Income. Interest income was generated from seller notes receivable
that arose in conjunction with the sale by Industrial Holdings, Inc. of several
business units prior to the merger with T-3.


11

Income Taxes. Income tax expense for 2003 was $0.4 million as compared to
$1.0 million in 2002. The effective tax rate was 36% in 2003 compared to an
effective tax rate of 42% in 2002. Tax expense in 2003 was lower due to lower
taxable earnings and a net benefit for state taxes that reduced total tax
expense.

Net Income. On a consolidated basis, net income was $0.8 million in 2003
compared with $1.4 million in 2002 as a result of the foregoing factors.

Six Months ended June 30, 2003 Compared with Six Months ended June 30, 2002

Revenues. On a consolidated basis, revenues decreased $0.3 million, or less
than 1%, in 2003 compared to 2002. Although drilling activity and oil and
natural gas prices increased from period to period, the continued softness in
the Gulf of Mexico rig count was a major cause of the slight decline in
revenues; however, this decrease was partially offset by increased revenues
resulting from an improved United States onshore rig count and increased market
penetration for our pressure control products and services.

Revenues for the Pressure Control segment increased $2.1 million, or 6%, in
2003 compared to 2002. The increase in revenues was primarily attributable to an
increase in market share for our pressure control products and services and
slight revenue increases associated with the higher United States onshore rig
count. These revenues were partially offset by the continued softness in Gulf of
Mexico drilling rig activity.

Revenues for the Products segment decreased $3.5 million, or 17%, in 2003
compared to 2002. This decrease was primarily attributable to lower revenues
from artificial lift systems and larger fabricated equipment and components for
use in the exploration and production of oil and gas, especially in the Gulf of
Mexico.

Revenues for the Distribution segment increased $1.2 million, or 6%, in
2003 compared to 2002 due to several large customer projects. These large
customer projects made up for a slight decline in the volume of smaller items
that typically comprise the revenue base due to the continued softness in
activity in the Gulf of Mexico.

Cost of Revenues. On a consolidated basis, cost of revenues increased $1.4
million, or 3%, in 2003 compared to 2002. Gross profit as a percentage of
revenues was 27% in 2003 compared to 29% in 2002. Gross profit margin was lower
on a consolidated basis in 2003 compared to 2002 because of continued pricing
pressure for our products and services, particularly those sold in the Gulf of
Mexico, and increased insurance and medical costs.

Cost of revenues for the Pressure Control segment increased $2.5 million,
or 11%, in 2003 compared to 2002. The increase is primarily a result of the
increase in revenues described above. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues
was 33% in 2003 compared to 36% in 2002. The decrease in gross profit margin was
due to pricing pressure for our products and services, increased insurance and
medical costs, a shift in product mix to lower margin items and the temporarily
higher than normal manufacturing costs of one of our new manufactured pressure
control products. We anticipate that the costs of manufacturing this new product
will decrease in future periods and benefit our operations.

Cost of revenues for the Products segment decreased $2.2 million, or 13%,
in 2003 compared to 2002. Gross profit as a percentage of revenues was 15% in
2003 compared to 19% in 2002. Gross profit margin decreased primarily as a
result of pricing pressure for our products and services and increased insurance
and medical costs.

Cost of revenues for the Distribution segment increased $1.2 million, or
9%, in 2003 compared to 2002, primarily due to the increase in revenues in 2003.
Gross profit as a percentage of revenues was 26% in 2003 compared to 28% in
2002. Gross profit margin decreased primarily because of pricing pressure for
our products, startup costs associated with the sale and distribution of a new
valve automation product line and initial costs associated with a new
distribution facility located in Houston, Texas. We anticipate that this new
product line and location will benefit our operations in future periods.


12

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. On a consolidated basis,
selling, general and administrative expenses increased $0.4 million, or 3%, in
2003 compared to 2002. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and
administrative expenses were 22% in 2003 compared to 21% in 2002.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Pressure Control
segment decreased $0.3 million, or 5%, in 2003 compared to 2002. As a percentage
of revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 17% in
2002 to 15% in 2003, primarily due to cost reduction strategies.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Products segment
decreased $0.6 million, or 18%, in 2003 compared to 2002, primarily due to cost
reduction strategies. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and
administrative expenses were 16% in 2002 and 2003.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Distribution segment
remained relatively constant in 2003 compared to 2002. As a percentage of
revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 22% in
2002 to 21% in 2003, primarily due to cost reduction strategies. These cost
reduction strategies were partially offset by increased insurance and medical
costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the Corporate operations
increased $1.2 million, or 51%, in 2003 compared to 2002. This was primarily
attributable to an increase in costs associated with relocation and compensation
expenses for new management, the recognition of severance payments to former
management, the integration of the former IHI operating units into T-3 and legal
fees.

Interest Expense. On a consolidated basis, interest expense decreased to
$1.6 million in 2003 from $1.9 million in 2002, primarily as a result of lower
debt levels and interest rates throughout 2003.

Interest Income. Interest income was generated from seller notes receivable
that arose in conjunction with the sale by Industrial Holdings, Inc. of several
business units prior to the merger with T-3.

Write-down of Acquired Note Receivable. In the first quarter of 2003, we
wrote down a note receivable to its estimated net realizable value. The note was
acquired in conjunction with the disposal by Industrial Holdings, Inc. of Beaird
Industries, Inc. prior to the completion of its merger with T-3. During the
first quarter of 2003, we were informed by the payor of the note of its
inability to make timely interest payments and to continue as a going concern
unless it restructures its debt obligations. We are negotiating terms with the
payor in an effort to maximize the value and collection of this note. A reserve
of approximately 50% of the note was recorded because we currently believe that
the note's net realizable value is approximately $1.7 million.

Income Taxes. Income tax expense for 2003 was $0.4 million as compared to
$1.9 million in 2002. The effective tax rate was 45% in 2003 compared to 42% in
2002. Tax expense for 2003 was increased by the effect of non-deductible
expenses, which remained relatively constant despite the significant decrease in
income before provision for income taxes from 2002 to 2003.

Net Income. On a consolidated basis, net income was $0.4 million in 2003
compared with $2.7 million in 2002 as a result of the foregoing factors.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At June 30, 2003, we had working capital of $27.6 million, current
maturities of long-term debt of $3.5 million, long-term debt of $25.4 million
and stockholders' equity of $131.1 million. Historically, our principal
liquidity requirements and uses of cash have been for debt service, capital
expenditures, working capital and acquisition financing, and our principal
sources of liquidity and cash have been from cash flows from operations,
borrowings under long-term debt arrangements and issuances of equity securities.
We have historically financed acquisitions through bank borrowings, sales of
equity and convertible notes (primarily to our largest stockholder, First
Reserve VIII, L.P.) and internally generated funds.


13

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities. For the six months ended June
30, 2003, net cash provided by operating activities was $1.4 million compared to
$2.4 million in the same period in 2002. Cash provided by operations was
primarily due to earnings plus non-cash charges, partially offset by high
working capital requirements in both periods.

Net Cash Used in Investing Activities. Principal uses of cash are for
capital expenditures and acquisitions. Investing activities used cash of $0.9
million in the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to $2.0 million in the
same period in 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, we made
capital expenditures of approximately $0.9 million and $2.1 million,
respectively. Approximately one-half of these expenditures in each period were
to support manufacturing operations, with the remainder incurred at the
corporate level to improve our information technology network in order to
integrate the former IHI operating units into T-3. We expect these costs at the
corporate level to substantially decrease in the third quarter of 2003 as we
complete much of the information technology network improvements.

Net Cash Used in Financing Activities. Sources of cash from financing
activities include borrowings under credit facilities and sales of equity
securities. Financing activities used net cash of $1.1 million in the six months
ended June 30, 2003 compared to $3.5 million in the same period in 2002. During
2003, we had borrowings of $0.7 million under our long-term debt credit
facilities compared to $0.4 million during 2002. During 2003, we made principal
payments of $1.7 million on our long-term debt, exclusive of its revolving
credit facility, compared to $3.2 million in 2002. During 2003, we had no net
borrowings or repayments on our revolving credit facility compared to net
repayments of $10.7 million in 2002. During 2002, we had proceeds of $10.0
million from the sale of equity securities to our largest stockholder, First
Reserve Fund VIII, L.P. These proceeds were used to reduce debt.

Principal Debt Instruments. As of June 30, 2003, we had an aggregate of
$28.9 million borrowed under our principal bank credit facility and debt
instruments entered into or assumed in connection with acquisitions, as well as
other bank financings. As of June 30, 2003, we had $20.5 million in borrowing
capacity under our revolving credit facility; however, as a result of
restrictions imposed by the funded debt-to-EBITDA ratio covenant, our
availability was limited to $7.3 million.

On December 17, 2001, we entered into a senior credit facility with Wells
Fargo, N.A. and General Electric Capital Corporation maturing December 17, 2004.
Concurrently, we entered into a $12.0 million subordinated term loan with Wells
Fargo Energy Capital, Inc. maturing December 17, 2005. The senior credit
facility includes a revolving credit facility of the lesser of a defined
borrowing base (based upon 85% of eligible accounts receivable and 50% of
eligible inventory) or $41.5 million, a term loan of $16.5 million and an
optional facility for up to an additional $30.0 million in the form of a
revolving credit commitment for future acquisitions based upon specific
criteria. The senior credit facility's term loan is payable in equal quarterly
installments of $0.8 million. The applicable interest rate of the senior credit
facility is governed by our trailing-twelve-month funded debt-to-EBITDA ratio
and ranges from prime plus 1.25% or LIBOR plus 2.25% to prime plus 2.00% or
LIBOR plus 3.00%. At June 30, 2003, the senior credit facility bore interest at
LIBOR plus 2.75%, with interest payable quarterly. We are required to prepay the
senior credit facility under certain circumstances with the net cash proceeds of
asset sales, insurance proceeds, equity issuances and institutional debt, and
commencing April 2003, if, and for so long as, our funded debt-to-EBITDA ratio
for the previous fiscal year is 2.50 to 1 or greater, with 50% of excess cash
flow as determined under the senior credit agreement. The senior credit facility
provides, among other covenants and restrictions, that we comply with certain
financial covenants, including a limitation on capital expenditures, a minimum
fixed charge coverage ratio, minimum consolidated tangible net worth and a
maximum funded debt-to-EBITDA ratio. As of June 30, 2003, we were in compliance
with the covenants under the senior credit facility. The senior credit facility
is collateralized by substantially all of our assets.

The subordinated term loan bears interest at a fixed rate of 9.50% with
interest payable quarterly. The principal balance is due in full on December 17,
2005. The effective interest rate, including amortization of loan costs, is
10.7%. The subordinated term loan provides, among other restrictions, that we
maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a maximum funded
debt-to-EBITDA ratio. Under the terms of our senior credit facility, we are not
currently permitted to make principal payments on the subordinated term loan. As
of June


14

30, 2003, we were in compliance with the covenants under the subordinated term
loan. The subordinated term loan is collateralized by a second lien on
substantially all of our assets.

We believe that cash generated from operations and amounts available under
our senior credit facility and from other sources of debt will be sufficient to
fund existing operations, working capital needs, capital expenditure
requirements and financing obligations. We also believe any significant increase
in capital expenditures caused by any need to increase manufacturing capacity
can be funded from operations or through debt financing.

We intend to pursue additional acquisition candidates, but the timing, size
or success of any acquisition effort and the related potential capital
commitments cannot be predicted. We expect to fund future cash acquisitions
primarily with cash flow from operations and borrowings, including the
un-borrowed portion of our senior credit facility or new debt issuances, but may
also issue additional equity either directly or in connection with an
acquisition. However, acquisition funds may not be available at terms acceptable
to us.

A summary of our outstanding contractual obligations and other commercial
commitments at June 30, 2003 is as follows (in thousands):



Payments Due by Period
----------------------
Less than 1 After 5
Contractual Obligations Total Year 1-3 Years 4-5 Years Years
----------------------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -------------

Long-term debt $ 28,915 $ 3,482 $ 24,823 $ 178 $ 432
Operating leases 4,634 1,478 1,932 1,084 140
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Total contractual obligations $ 33,549 $ 4,960 $ 26,755 $ 1,262 $ 572
========== ========== ========== ========== ==========


FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND RISK FACTORS

Certain information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities
Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. You can
identify these forward-looking statements by the words "expects," "projects,"
"believes," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "budgets," "predicts,"
"estimates" and similar expressions.

We have based the forward-looking statements relating to our operations on
our current expectations, and estimates and projections about us and about the
industries in which we operate in general. These statements are not guarantees
of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. In
addition, many of these forward-looking statements are based on assumptions
about future events that may prove to be inaccurate. Actual outcomes and results
may differ materially from what we have expressed or forecast in the
forward-looking statements.

BECAUSE WE DEPEND ON THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY, A DECLINE IN OIL AND GAS PRICES
OR A DECREASE IN INDUSTRY ACTIVITY WILL NEGATIVELY IMPACT OUR PROFITS.

We are, and will continue to be, dependent upon the oil and gas industry
and the level of oil and gas exploration and production. The level of
exploration and production depends upon the prevailing view of future product
prices. Many factors affect the supply and demand for oil and gas and therefore
influence product prices, including:

- the level of production from known reserves;

- weather conditions;

- the actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries;

- political instability in the Middle East and elsewhere;

- the level of oil and gas inventories;


15

- the cost of producing oil and gas;

- the level of drilling activity;

- worldwide economic activity; and

- environmental regulation.

If there is a significant reduction in demand for drilling services, in
cash flows of drilling contractors or production companies or in drilling or
well servicing rig utilization rates, then demand for our products will decline.

THE OILFIELD SERVICE INDUSTRY IN WHICH WE OPERATE IS HIGHLY COMPETITIVE, WHICH
MAY RESULT IN A LOSS OF MARKET SHARE OR A DECREASE IN REVENUE OR PROFIT MARGINS.

The oilfield service industry in which we operate is highly competitive.
Many of our competitors have greater financial and other resources than we do.
Each of our operating units is subject to competition from a number of similarly
sized or larger businesses. Factors that affect competition include price,
quality and customer service. Strong competition may result in a loss of market
share and a decrease in revenue and profit margins.

OUR INSURANCE COVERAGE MAY BE INADEQUATE TO COVER CERTAIN CONTINGENT
LIABILITIES.

Our business exposes us to possible claims for personal injury or death
resulting from the use of our products. We carry comprehensive insurance,
subject to deductibles, at levels we believe are sufficient to cover existing
and future claims. However, we could be subject to a claim or liability that
exceeds our insurance coverage. In addition, we may not be able to maintain
adequate insurance coverage at rates we believe are reasonable.

OUR OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO REGULATION BY FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES THAT MAY LIMIT OUR ABILITY TO OPERATE OUR BUSINESS.

Our business is affected by governmental regulations relating to our
industry segments in general, as well as environmental and safety regulations
that have specific application to our business. While we are not aware of any
proposed or pending legislation, future legislation may have an adverse effect
on our business, financial condition, results of operations or prospects.

We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws,
including those governing air emissions, water discharges and the storage,
handling, disposal and remediation of petroleum and hazardous substances. We
have in the past and will likely in the future incur expenditures to ensure
compliance with environmental laws. Due to the possibility of unanticipated
factual or regulatory developments, the amount and timing of future
environmental expenditures could vary substantially from those currently
anticipated. Moreover, certain of our facilities have been in operation for many
years and, over that time, we and other predecessor operators have generated and
disposed of wastes that are or may be considered hazardous. Accordingly,
although we have undertaken considerable efforts to comply with applicable laws,
it is possible that environmental requirements or facts not currently known to
management will require unanticipated efforts and expenditures that cannot be
currently quantified.

FOUR OF OUR DIRECTORS MAY HAVE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BECAUSE THEY ARE ALSO
DIRECTORS OR OFFICERS OF FIRST RESERVE CORPORATION. THE RESOLUTION OF THESE
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST MAY NOT BE IN OUR OR OUR STOCKHOLDERS' BEST INTERESTS.

Four of our directors, Mark E. Baldwin, Thomas R. Denison, Joseph R.
Edwards and Ben A. Guill, are also current directors or officers of First
Reserve Corporation, which controls the general partner of First Reserve


16

Fund VIII, L.P., our largest stockholder. This may create conflicts of interest
because these directors have responsibilities to First Reserve Fund VIII and its
owners. Their duties as directors or officers of First Reserve Corporation may
conflict with their duties as directors of the Company regarding business
dealings between First Reserve Corporation and the Company and other matters.
The resolution of these conflicts may not always be in our or our stockholders'
best interests.

WE WILL RENOUNCE ANY INTEREST IN SPECIFIED BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES, AND FIRST
RESERVE FUND VIII AND ITS DIRECTOR DESIGNEES ON OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS GENERALLY
WILL HAVE NO OBLIGATION TO OFFER US THOSE OPPORTUNITIES.

First Reserve Fund VIII has investments in other oilfield service companies
that compete with us, and First Reserve Corporation and its affiliates, other
than T-3, may invest in other such companies in the future. We refer to First
Reserve Corporation, its other affiliates and its portfolio companies as the
First Reserve group. Our certificate of incorporation provides that, so long as
First Reserve Corporation and its affiliates continue to own at least 20% of our
common stock, we renounce any interest in specified business opportunities. Our
certificate of incorporation also provides that if an opportunity in the
oilfield services industry is presented to a person who is a member of the First
Reserve group, including any individual who also serves as First Reserve Fund
VIII's director designee of the Company:

- no member of the First Reserve group or any of those individuals
will have any obligation to communicate or offer the opportunity to
us; and

- such entity or individual may pursue the opportunity as that entity
or individual sees fit,

unless:

- it was presented to a member of the First Reserve group in that
person's capacity as a director or officer of T-3; or

- the opportunity was identified solely through the disclosure of
information by or on behalf of T-3.

These provisions of our certificate of incorporation may be amended only by an
affirmative vote of holders of at least 80% of our outstanding common stock. As
a result of these charter provisions, our future competitive position and growth
potential could be adversely affected.

THE CONVICTION OF OUR FORMER INDEPENDENT AUDITORS, ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP, ON
FEDERAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE CHARGES MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT ARTHUR ANDERSEN
LLP'S ABILITY TO SATISFY ANY CLAIMS ARISING FROM THE PROVISION OF AUDITING
SERVICES TO US AND MAY IMPEDE OUR ACCESS TO THE CAPITAL MARKETS.

Arthur Andersen LLP, which audited our financial statements for the years
ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, was convicted in June 2002 on federal
obstruction of justice charges. In light of the jury verdict and the underlying
events, Arthur Andersen LLP stopped practicing before the Securities and
Exchange Commission and subsequently ceased operations. The Securities and
Exchange Commission has stated that, for the time being subject to certain
conditions, it will continue accepting financial statements audited by Arthur
Andersen LLP. After reasonable efforts, we have not been able to obtain the
consent of Arthur Andersen LLP to the incorporation by reference of its audit
report dated March 8, 2002 into our registration statement Form S-8. As
permitted under Rule 437a promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (Securities Act), we have not filed the written consent of Arthur
Andersen LLP that would otherwise be required by the Securities Act. Because
Arthur Andersen LLP has not consented to the incorporation by reference of their
report in the registration statement, you may not be able to recover amounts
from Arthur Andersen LLP under Section 11(a) of the Securities Act for any
untrue statement of a material fact or any omission to state a material fact, if
any, contained in or omitted from our financial statements included in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, which
are incorporated by reference in the registration statement.


17

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS

Market risk generally represents the risk that losses may occur in the
value of financial instruments as a result of movements in interest rates,
foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices.

We are exposed to some market risk due to the floating interest rate under
our revolving credit facility and certain of our term debt. As of June 30, 2003,
our revolving credit facility had no principal balance and our variable
long-term debt had a principal balance of $14.4 million, all with interest rates
that float with prime or LIBOR. A 1.0% increase in interest rates could result
in a $0.1 million annual increase in interest expense on the existing principal
balances.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management team continues to review our internal controls and
procedures and the effectiveness of those controls. Within the 90 days prior to
the date of this report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision of
and with the participation of our management, including our President and Chief
Executive Officer and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based
upon that evaluation, our President and Chief Executive Officer and Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information
relating to the Company (including our consolidated subsidiaries) required to be
included in our periodic SEC filings.

There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other
factors that could significantly affect our disclosure procedures subsequent to
the date of their evaluation, nor were there any significant deficiencies or
material weaknesses in our internal controls. As a result, no corrective actions
were required or taken.


18

PART II

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in various claims and litigation arising in the ordinary
course of business. While there are uncertainties inherent in the ultimate
outcome of such matters and it is impossible to currently determine the ultimate
costs that may be incurred, we believe the resolution of such uncertainties and
the incurrence of such costs should not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 2. CHANGES IN SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

a. The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company was held June 2,
2003.

b. The following persons were elected at that meeting as Class II
directors:



Number of Votes
----------------------------
Name of Nominee For Withheld
--------------- --------- ------------

Joseph R. Edwards 9,393,447 56,354
Steven W. Krablin 9,447,467 2,334
James M. Tidwell 9,447,467 2,334


The Class II directors' terms expire at the 2006 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. The Class I director, whose term expires at the 2005 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders, is Mark E. Baldwin. The Class III directors,
whose terms expire at the 2004 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, are Thomas
R. Denison, Ben A. Guill and Gus D. Halas.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

a. Exhibits

Exhibit Number Identification of Exhibit
-------------- -------------------------

31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended

31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant
to Rule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended

32.1 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 (Chief Executive
Officer)

32.2 Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The
Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 (Chief Financial
Officer)

b. Reports on Form 8-K

On May 1, 2003, we filed a current report on Form 8-K disclosing in
Item 5 that we had appointed Gus D. Halas as our president and chief
executive officer effective May 1, 2003.


19

SIGNATURES

PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON ITS
BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED, ON THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST,
2003.

T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.

By: /s/ STEVEN J. BRADING
----------------------------------------

STEVEN J. BRADING (CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER AND VICE PRESIDENT)

By: /s/ MICHAEL T. MINO
----------------------------------------

MICHAEL T. MINO (CORPORATE
CONTROLLER AND VICE PRESIDENT)


20

INDEX TO EXHIBITS



EXHIBIT
NUMBER IDENTIFICATION OF EXHIBIT
-------- -------------------------

31.1* -- Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and
Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

31.2* -- Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and
Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.

32.1* -- Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Executive Officer).

32.2* -- Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Chief Financial Officer).


- ----------

* Filed herewith.