Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

FORM 10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended: October 26, 2002

OR

For the transition period from:                         to                         

Commission file number: 333-57011

Iron Age Corporation

Robinson Plaza Three, Suite 400, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15205

(412) 787-4100

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY
PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable.

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date. Not Applicable.

Table of Contents

PART 1 — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

	The following financial statements are presented herein:
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 26, 2002 and January 26, 2002
	Consolidated Statements of Loss for the three months and nine months ended October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

-2-

Table of Contents

Iron Age Corporation
Consolidated Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes.

-3-

Table of Contents

Iron Age Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Loss (Unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

-4-

Table of Contents

Iron Age Corporation
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

See accompanying notes.

-5-

Table of Contents

Iron Age Corporation
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements (Unaudited)

October 26, 2002

1. Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the nine month period ended October 26, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ended January 25, 2003. For further information, refer to Iron Age Corporation’s (“Iron Age” or the “Company”) consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2002.

2.

Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

3.

Intangible Assets

Effective January 27, 2002, the Company adopted Statement on Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, “Business Combinations”, and Statement on Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (the “Statements”). Under the new rules, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives will no longer be amortized but will be subject to annual impairment tests in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. While amortization of goodwill will no longer be reflected in the Company’s financial statements, amortization related to certain of the Company’s other intangible assets will continue to be deductible for income tax purposes. Amortization expense related to the Company’s goodwill for the three months and nine months ended October 27, 2001, was $0.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively.

-6-

Table of Contents

In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company tested its goodwill for impairment, which required an assessment of whether there is an indication that goodwill is impaired as of the date of adoption, January 27, 2002. The Company has identified two reporting units, distribution and manufacturing, and determined the carrying value of those units as of the date of adoption. Only the distribution reporting unit had related goodwill. The Company assessed the fair value of the distribution reporting unit and compared it to the reporting unit’s carrying amount, as computed in Step 1 of the evaluation. The fair value of the distribution reporting unit in Step 1 of the evaluation was determined using a 5-year discounted cash flow model. Key assumptions included management’s estimates of future profitability, capital requirements, a discount rate of 14.6% and a terminal growth rate of 2%. Based upon the initial evaluation, Step 2 of the evaluation was required, as the distribution reporting unit had a carrying value in excess of its fair value. In conjunction with Step 2, the Company retained an independent appraisal firm to prepare a valuation of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Step 2 requires the implied fair value of goodwill to be calculated by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to its tangible and intangible net assets, other than goodwill. The remaining unallocated fair value represents the implied fair value of the goodwill. Management and the independent appraisal firm have determined that all of the Company’s goodwill was impaired at January 27, 2002. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $77.5 million, net of tax of $1.7 million, as a cumulative effect of change in accounting for goodwill, for the nine month period ended October 26, 2002. The goodwill impairment charge has no effect on cash, the ongoing operation of the Company, the covenants relating to the Bank Credit Facility or the indenture for the Senior Subordinated Notes.

The following table presents reported net (loss) income exclusive of goodwill amortization expense for the three month period and the nine month period ended October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001, respectively.

Amortization expense for other intangible assets subject to amortization for the three month and nine month periods ended October 26, 2002 and October 27, 2001 are $0.5 million, $0.5 million, $1.6 million and $1.5 million, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the fiscal year ended January 25, 2003 and the succeeding five fiscal years is approximately $2.2 million per year.

-7-

Table of Contents

4.

Comprehensive Loss

5.

Related Party Transactions

On October 1, 2002, the Company and Iron Age Holdings Corporation (“Holdings”), the Company’s parent company, entered into a promissory note permitting Holdings to borrow up to $4.8 million for purposes of repurchasing Holdings’ 12 1/8% Senior Discount Notes due 2009 (the “Discount Notes”). The promissory note bears interest at 14.0% and matures on October 1, 2009. Holdings borrowed approximately $1.04 million from the Company on October 11, 2002 to partially fund its repurchase of $6.801 million in face value of its Discount Notes.

On May 23, 2002, the Company purchased 25.08 shares of Iron Age Holdings Corporation’s Series B non voting, cumulative, redeemable preferred stock with a par value of $.01 per share (the “Holdings Series B Preferred Stock”) from certain officers of the Company, in exchange for the unpaid balance of principal and accrued interest of their outstanding Term Promissory Notes in the amount of approximately $0.14 million. Following the purchase, these officers held 22.67 shares of Holdings Series B Preferred Stock. The Company recorded $0.13 million as stock-based compensation for the nine months ended October 26, 2002.

6.

Long-term debt

On September 23, 2002, the Company, Holdings and Falcon Shoe Mfg. Co. (“Falcon”), one of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into a $50.0 million Loan and Security Agreement (the “Bank Credit Facility”) with a financial institution and another lender. The Bank Credit Facility consists of a $38.0 million revolving credit facility, including a $2.0 million letter of credit subfacility, and two term loans: Term Loan A of up to an aggregate of $1.0 million and Term Loan B of up to an aggregate of $3.0 million. In addition, the Bank Credit Facility includes a third term loan, Term Loan C, of up to an aggregate of $12.0 million. Availability under the Bank Credit Facility is governed by a borrowing base determined by advance rates against the qualified inventory and accounts receivable of the Company and Falcon.

The revolving credit facility and the Term Loan C are due in full on September 23, 2007. The

-8-

Table of Contents

outstanding balances of the Term Loan A and the Term Loan B are due in monthly installments through September 23, 2007. Term Loan A, Term Loan B and the revolving credit facility bear interest at either the prime rate or LIBOR, at the option of the Company, plus an applicable margin. Outstanding borrowings on the revolving credit facility at prime rate plus a margin of 1.50% and LIBOR plus a margin of 3.75% are approximately $3.0 million and $12.0 million, respectively. Borrowings of approximately $1.0 million for Term Loan A are at prime rate plus a margin of 1.50%. Borrowings on Term Loan B at prime rate plus a margin of 3.25% and LIBOR plus a margin of 5.50% are approximately $0.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The interest rate for Term Loan C is 13.25%, including 2.0% paid-in-kind. Outstanding borrowings For Term Loan C approximate $12.0 million. The Company pays a 0.375% commitment fee on the undrawn amounts of the revolving credit facility. The Company pays a 2.00% letter of credit fee on any outstanding Letters of Credit.

At closing, the Company drew the entire amount of Term Loan A, Term Loan B and Term Loan C and approximately $14.2 million on the revolving credit facility, to refinance its previous bank credit facility of approximately $27.6 million, including accrued interest, and to pay certain financing fees and expenses. In connection with the refinancing of the Company’s previous bank credit facility, the Company wrote-off approximately $0.2 million, net of tax of $0.1 million, of unamortized debt issuance costs remaining from its previous bank credit facility.

The Company incurred approximately $2.0 million in capitalizable debt issuance costs are being be amortized over the term of the Bank Credit Facility.

The Bank Credit Facility contains certain financial and other covenants, requiring the Company to maintain various financial ratios, limiting its ability to incur additional indebtedness, restricting the amount of capital expenditures that may be incurred, and limiting transactions with affiliates. The Bank Credit Facility also limits the Company’s ability to engage in mergers or acquisitions, sell certain assets, pay dividends or repurchase its stock. The Bank Credit Facility is secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets. The Company’s domestic and Canadian subsidiaries are required to guarantee its obligations under the Bank Credit Facility.

Although the Bank Credit Facility expires on September 23, 2007, the revolving credit facility has been classified as current in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 6, Classification of Short Term Obligations Expected to be Refinanced.

-9-

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.

General

The following discussions should be read in conjunction with the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ended October 26, 2002, and the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 26, 2002.

Results of Operations

Three Months ended October 26, 2002 compared to
Three Months ended October 27, 2001

Net Sales for the three months ended October 26, 2002 (“third quarter 2003”) were $24.9 million compared to $25.5 million for the comparable three month period ended October 27, 2001 (“third quarter 2002”), a decrease of $0.6 million, or 2.4%. The decrease in net sales was attributable to a decrease of $0.3 million, or 4.2%, in the Company’s primary footwear distribution business line, primarily related to a decrease of approximately $0.3 million, or 6.6%, in the Company’s industrial direct business line, as a result of decreases in purchases by several customers, reflecting a continued softness in the general economic environment. Net sales in third quarter 2003 were flat in the Company’s retail business line at $19.1 million and the Company’s direct mail business line at $1.5 million, compared to third quarter 2002. In addition, for third quarter 2003, there were no sales relating to the Company’s vision products business line, which was sold in December 2001, compared to $0.3 million in net sales for third quarter 2002, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 50.0% of the overall decrease in net sales.

Gross Profit for third quarter 2003 was $12.2 million compared to $12.4 million for third quarter 2002, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 1.6%. The decrease in gross profit was primarily related to the decrease in net sales as discussed above. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit for third quarter 2003 increased to 48.9%, an increase of 0.2% from third quarter 2002. Gross profit percentage decreased in the Company’s primary footwear distribution line by 0.1% in third quarter 2003, due primarily to general changes in product mix and the impact of competitive pricing strategies. The decrease in gross profit percentage in the primary footwear distribution line was offset by a 2.0% increase in gross profit percentage in the Company’s manufacturing subsidiary.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses for third quarter 2003 were $10.4 million compared to $10.9 million for third quarter 2002, a decrease of $0.5 million, or 4.6%, due primarily to decreases

-10-

Table of Contents

of approximately $0.4 million in employee costs, including salaries and wages and approximately $0.1 million in advertising cost reductions.

Provision for impairment for third quarter 2002 was $1.8 million. The provision for impairment relates to the optical business line that the Company sold in December 2001. There were no material favorable effects on the financial statements associated with the assets that were sold. The provision for impairment included goodwill and certain other intangible assets, including customer lists, that the Company’s management determined was impaired.

Operating Income for third quarter 2003 was $0.8 million compared to an operating loss of $1.9 million for third quarter 2002, an increase of $2.7 million, or 142.1%. As a percentage of net sales, operating income was 3.2% of net sales for third quarter 2003 compared to an operating loss of 7.5% of net sales for third quarter 2002. The decrease in gross profit was offset by reductions in selling, general and administrative expenses as discussed above, the provision for the optical business line impairment in third quarter 2002 and by decreases in amortization expense, primarily goodwill, in conjunction with the adoption of Statement of Financial accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142.

Interest Expense for third quarter 2003 was $2.4 million compared to $2.1 million for third quarter 2002, an increase of $0.3 million, or 14.3%. Interest expense for third quarter 2002 included the favorable change of approximately $0.2 million in the fair market value of the Company’s interest rate swap agreement due to the decrease in interest rates in third quarter 2002. The interest rate swap agreement was terminated in October 2001. Excluding the favorable impact of the interest rate swap agreement in third quarter 2002, interest expense for third quarter 2003 increased due to the effect of higher interest rates and increased indebtedness relating to the Bank Credit Facility.

Income Tax Benefit for third quarter 2003 was $0.6 million compared to an income tax benefit of $0.7 million for third quarter 2002. Income tax benefit for third quarter 2003 differs from that of the statutory income tax rate due primarily to nondeductible goodwill amortization. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company recorded no goodwill amortization for third quarter 2003.

Extraordinary Item for third quarter 2003 was an extraordinary loss of approximately $0.2 million, net of income tax effect of $0.14 million, related to the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs for the previous bank credit facility which was refinanced in September 2002 as discussed above.

Nine Months ended October 26, 2002 compared to
Nine Months ended October 27, 2001

Net Sales for the nine months ended October 26, 2002 (“first three quarters 2003”) were $76.3 million compared to $81.0 million for the comparable nine month period ended October 27, 2001 (“first three quarters 2002”), a decrease of $4.7 million, or 5.8%. The decrease in net sales was attributable to a decrease of $3.3 million, or 4.2%, in the Company’s primary footwear distribution business line, primarily related to a decrease of $2.2 million, or 16.0%, in the Company’s industrial direct business line, as a result of decreases in purchases by several large customers, reflecting a continued softness in the general economic environment. In addition, net sales decreased by $0.3

-11-

Table of Contents

million, or 0.6%, in the Company’s retail business line, reflecting a decline in the general economic environment, including plant closings and employee layoffs that affected the Company’s customers. Further, the economy continues to adversely impact the Company’s direct mail business line. Net sales in the direct mail business line decreased by $0.3 million, or 6.3%. The decrease in net sales was also related to a decrease of $0.4 million, or 8.5% of the overall decrease in net sales, in the Company’s branded wholesale business line, as there were no sales to the Company’s primary wholesale customer in first three quarters 2003, due to the bankruptcy of that customer in October 2001. In addition, sales decreased by $0.4 million, or 24.3% in the Company’s manufacturing subsidiary, due to decreased sales to its external customers. Also, for first three quarters 2003, there were no sales relating to the Company’s vision products business line, which was sold in December 2001, compared to $1.0 million in net sales for first three quarters 2002, a decrease of $1.0 million, or 21.3% of the overall decrease in net sales.

Gross Profit for first three quarters 2003 was $38.1 million compared to $41.1 million for first three quarters 2002, a decrease of $3.0 million, or 7.3%. The decrease in gross profit was primarily related to the decrease in net sales as discussed above. As a percentage of net sales, gross profit for first three quarters 2003 decreased to 49.9%, a decrease of 0.8% from first three quarters 2002. Gross profit percentage decreased in the Company’s primary footwear distribution line by 1.4% for first three quarters 2003, due primarily to general changes in product mix and the impact of competitive pricing strategies. The decrease in gross profit percentage was partially offset by a 2.5% increase in gross profit percentage in the Company’s manufacturing subsidiary.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses for first three quarters 2003 were $30.6 million compared to $31.8 million for first three quarters 2002, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 3.8%, due primarily to the effect of employee related cost reductions, including salaries and wages.

Provision for impairment for first three quarters 2002 was $1.8 million. The provision for impairment relates to the optical business line that the Company sold in December 2001. There were no material favorable effects on the financial statements associated with the assets that were sold. The provision for impairment included goodwill and certain other intangible assets, including customer lists, that the Company’s management determined was impaired.

Operating Income for first three quarters 2003 was $4.7 million compared to $2.7 million for first three quarters 2002, an increase of $2.0 million, or 74.1%. As a percentage of net sales, operating income was 6.2% of net sales for first three quarters 2003 compared to 3.3% of net sales for first three quarters 2002. The decrease in gross profit was offset by reductions in selling, general and administrative expenses as discussed above, the provision for impairment in first three quarters 2002 and by decreases in depreciation expense and amortization expense, primarily goodwill, in conjunction with the adoption of SFAS No. 142.

Interest Expense for first three quarters 2003 was $6.7 million compared to $6.4 million for first three quarters 2002, an increase of $0.3 million, or 4.7%. For first three quarters 2002, interest expense was favorably impacted by an increase of approximately $0.8 million in the fair market value of the Company’s interest rate swap agreement due to decreases in interest rates. The interest rate swap agreement was terminated in October 2001. Excluding the favorable impact of the interest

-12-

Table of Contents

rate swap agreement in first three quarters 2002, interest expense for first three quarters 2003 decreased due to the effect of lower interest rates and decreased indebtedness relating to the previous bank credit facility.

Income Tax Benefit for first three quarters 2003 was $0.5 million compared to an income tax expense of $0.6 million for first three quarters 2002. Income tax expense for first three quarters 2002 differs from that of the statutory income tax rate due primarily to nondeductible goodwill amortization. Upon the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company recorded no goodwill amortization for first three quarters 2003. In addition, first three quarters 2002 included a charge related to the recognition of a valuation allowance against the deferred tax benefit for state net operating loss carryforwards. At January 27, 2001, the Company had available state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $0.7 million, which expire in various years beginning in 2002 through 2019. For first three quarters 2002, the Company reviewed the likelihood of utilizing the state net operating loss carryforwards and determined that it is currently more likely than not that the benefit will not be realized. The Company will continually monitor its state tax position and may determine in the future that some or all of the state net operating losses becomes realizable. At that point, the valuation allowance will be reduced to reflect the net realizable amount which will result in an increase in net income.

Extraordinary Item for first three quarters 2003 was an extraordinary loss of approximately $0.2 million, net of income tax effect of $0.14 million, related to the write-off of unamortized debt issue costs for the previous bank credit facility which was refinanced in September 2002 as discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

-13-

Table of Contents

Sources and Uses of Cash

The Company’s primary cash needs are working capital, capital expenditures and debt service. The Company has financed cash requirements primarily through internally generated cash flow and funds borrowed under credit facilities.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $1.3 million for first three quarters 2003, a decrease of $6.5 million as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $7.8 million in first three quarters 2002. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily related to changes in operating assets and liabilities, particularly increases in accounts receivable and decreases in accounts payable. The change in accounts receivable relates to the impact of new orders from a large customer in first three quarters 2003 as well as collection activity in first three quarters 2002 that paralleled the decline in sales volume. The change in accounts payable reflects a reduced level of product purchases and the timing of payments to certain key vendors.

The Company’s investing activities for first three quarters 2003 consisted of capital expenditures of approximately $2.5 million for improvements in retail stores, shoemobiles and equipment and approximately $0.2 million for the acquisition of software for internal use. Capital expenditures of approximately $2.4 million for first three quarters 2002 included capital expenditures of approximately $1.4 million for improvements in retail stores, shoemobiles and equipment and approximately $1.0 million for the acquisition of software for internal use.

The Company’s financing activities for first three quarters 2003 provided under the Bank Credit Facility and the previous bank credit facility, were approximately $1.4 million, which included the scheduled principal payments of approximately $0.1 million on the Bank Credit Facility and $4.6 million on the previous bank credit facility. The Company used approximately $4.6 million for financing activities for first three quarters 2002, which primarily consisted of principal payments related to the previous bank credit facility.

The Company’s total working capital as of October 26, 2002 was $22.9 million. At January 26, 2002, working capital was $33.4 million. The decrease in working capital is primarily related to the classification of the revolving credit facility as current in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 6, Classification of Short Term Obligations Expected to be Refinanced.

Cash flow from operations for first three quarters 2003 was sufficient to cover debt service requirements under the Bank Credit Facility. The Company’s ability to make scheduled payments of principal, or to pay the interest or premium (if any) on, or to refinance, its indebtedness, or to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on its future performance, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond its control. Based upon the current level of operations, management believes that cash flow from operations and available cash, together with available borrowings under the Bank Credit Facility, will be adequate to meet the Company’s anticipated future requirements for working capital, budgeted capital expenditures and scheduled payments of principal and interest on its indebtedness

-14-

Table of Contents

for the next several years. There can be no assurance that the Company’s business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations or that future borrowing will be available under the Bank Credit Facility in an amount sufficient to enable the Company to service its indebtedness, including the Senior Subordinated Notes, or to make capital expenditures.

The Company’s debt consists of the Senior Subordinated Notes, the Bank Credit Facility and certain other debt. The Bank Credit Facility, consists of a $38.0 million revolving credit facility, including a $2.0 million letter of credit subfacility, and two term loans: Term Loan A of up to an aggregate $1.0 million and Term Loan B of up to an aggregate of $3.0 million. In addition, the Bank Credit Facility includes a third term loan, Term Loan C, of up to an aggregate of $12.0 million. The Company’s other debt of $1.3 million consists of capital leases and other notes. As of October 26, 2002, approximately $15.0 million of the revolving credit facility was outstanding. In addition, outstanding balances as of October 26, 2002, for Term Loan A, Term Loan B and Term Loan C were approximately $1.0 million, $2.9 million and $12.0 million, respectively. The Company has borrowing availability of approximately $6.9 million under the revolving credit facility as of October 26, 2002. Term Loan A and Term Loan B mature in monthly installments from October 2002 until final payment in September 2007. The revolving credit facility and Term Loan C will mature in September 2007 and have no scheduled interim principal payments.

The Senior Subordinated Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured, senior subordinated basis by each Domestic Restricted Subsidiary that is a Material Subsidiary (as such terms are defined in the indenture for the Senior Subordinated Notes (the “Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture”)) (whether currently existing, newly acquired or created). Each such subsidiary guaranty (a “Subsidiary Guaranty”) will provide that the subsidiary guarantor, as primary obligor and not merely as surety, will irrevocably and unconditionally guarantee on an unsecured, senior subordinated basis the performance and punctual payment when due, whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise, of all obligations of the Company under the Senior Subordinated Notes Indenture and the Senior Subordinated Notes, whether for payment of principal or of interest on the Senior Subordinated Notes, expenses, indemnification or otherwise. As of October 26, 2002, none of the Company’s Domestic Restricted Subsidiaries was a Material Subsidiary, and therefore no Subsidiary Guaranty was in force or effect.

Long-term debt

On September 23, 2002, the Company, Holdings Corporation and Falcon, entered into the Bank Credit Facility with a financial institution and another lender. The Bank Credit Facility consists of a $38.0 million revolving credit facility, including a $2.0 million letter of credit subfacility, and two term loans: Term Loan A of up to an aggregate of $1.0 million and Term loan B of up to an aggregate of $3.0 million. In addition, the Bank Credit Facility includes a third term loan, Term Loan C, of up to an aggregate of $12.0 million. Availability under the Bank Credit Facility is governed by a borrowing base determined by advance rates against the inventory and accounts receivable of the Company and Falcon.

The revolving credit facility and the Term Loan C are due in full on September 23, 2007. The outstanding balances of the Term Loan A and the Term Loan B are due in installments through

-15-

Table of Contents

September 23, 2007. Term Loan A, Term Loan B and the revolving credit facility bear interest at either the prime rate or LIBOR, at the option of Holdings, plus an applicable margin. Outstanding borrowings on the revolving credit facility at prime rate plus a margin of 1.50% and LIBOR plus a margin of 3.75% are approximately $3.0 million and $12.0 million, respectively. Borrowings of approximately $1.0 million for Term Loan A are at prime rate plus a margin of 1.50%. Borrowings on Term Loan B at prime rate plus a margin of 3.25% and LIBOR plus a margin of 5.50% are approximately $0.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively. The interest rate for Term Loan C is 13.25%, including 2.0% paid-in-kind. Outstanding borrowings For Term Loan C approximate $12.0 million. The Company pays a 0.375% commitment fee on the undrawn amounts of the revolving credit facility. The Company pays a 2.00% letter of credit fee on any outstanding Letters of Credit.

At closing, the Company drew the entire amount of Term Loan A, Term Loan B and Term Loan C and approximately $14.2 million on the revolving credit facility, to refinance its previous bank credit facility of approximately $27.6 million, including accrued interest, and to pay certain financing fees and expenses. In connection with the refinancing of the Company’s previous bank credit facility, The Company wrote-off approximately $0.3 million of unamortized debt issuance costs remaining from its previous bank credit facility.

The Company incurred approximately $2.0 million in capitalizable debt issuance costs which are being amortized over the term of the Bank Credit Facility.

The Bank Credit Facility contains certain financial and other covenants, including covenants requiring the Company to maintain various financial ratios, limiting its ability to incur additional indebtedness, restricting the amount of capital expenditures that may be incurred, and limiting transactions with affiliates. The Bank Credit Facility also limits the Company’s ability to engage in mergers or acquisitions, sell certain assets, pay dividends or repurchase its stock. The Bank Credit Facility is secured by a first priority security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets. The Company’s domestic and Canadian subsidiaries are required to guarantee its obligations under the Bank Credit Facility.

Although the Bank Credit Facility expires on September 23, 2007, the revolving credit facility has been classified as current in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 6, Classification of Short Term Obligations Expected to be Refinanced.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Effective January 27, 2002, the Company adopted Statement on financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141, “Business Combinations”, and Statement on Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (the “Statements”). Under the new rules, goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives will no longer be amortized but will be subject to annual impairment tests in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. While amortization of goodwill will no longer be reflected in Holdings’ financial statements, amortization related to certain of the Company’s other intangible assets will continue to be deductible for income tax purposes. Amortization expense related to the Company’s goodwill for the three months and

-16-

Table of Contents

nine months ended October 27, 2001, was $0.6 million and $1.7 million, respectively.

In connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 142, the Company tested its goodwill for impairment, which required an assessment of whether there is an indication that goodwill is impaired as of the date of adoption, January 27, 2002. The Company has identified two reporting units, distribution and manufacturing, and determined the carrying value of those units as of the date of adoption. Only the distribution reporting unit had related goodwill. The Company assessed the fair value of the distribution reporting unit and compared it to the reporting unit’s carrying amount, as computed in Step 1 of the evaluation. The fair value of the distribution reporting unit in Step 1 of the evaluation was determined using a 5-year discounted cash flow model. Key assumptions included management’s estimates of future profitability, capital requirements, a discount rate of 14.6% and a terminal growth rate of 2%. Based upon the initial evaluation, Step 2 of the evaluation was required, as the distribution reporting unit had a carrying value in excess of its fair value. In conjunction with Step 2, the Company retained an independent appraisal firm to prepare a valuation of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Step 2 requires the implied fair value of goodwill to be calculated by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to its tangible and intangible net assets, other than goodwill. The remaining unallocated fair value represents the implied fair value of the goodwill. Management and the independent appraisal firm have determined that all of the Company’s goodwill was impaired at January 27, 2002. Accordingly, the Company has recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $77.5 million, net of tax of $1.7 million, as a cumulative effect of change in accounting for goodwill, for the nine month period ended October 26, 2002. The goodwill impairment charge has no effect on cash, the ongoing operation of the Company, the covenants relating to the Bank Credit Facility or the indenture for the Senior Subordinated Notes.

Effective January 27, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (“FAS 144”), “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,”. This Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets. This Statement supercedes FAS Statement No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of,” and the accounting and reporting provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions,” for the disposal of a segment of a business (as previously defined in that Opinion). FAS 144 has had no material impact on the financial statements of the Company for the six months ended October 26, 2002.

In August 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS 143 requires entities to record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is initially recorded, the entity capitalizes the cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon settlement. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002, with earlier application encouraged. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 143, but does not believe that SFAS 143 will have a material impact on its financial statements.

-17-

Table of Contents

SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities, addresses financial accounting and reporting for costs associated with exit or disposal activities and nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity(including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” The principal differences between SFAS 146 and Issue 94-3 relates to SFAS 146’s requirements for recognition of a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity. SFAS 146 requires that a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized when the liability is incurred. Under Issue 94-3, a liability for an exit cost as generally defined in Issue 94-3 was recognized at the date of an entity’s commitment to an exit plan. A fundamental conclusion reached by the FASB in SFAS 146 is that an entity’s commitment to a plan, by itself, does not create an obligation that meets the definition of a liability. Therefore, SFAS 146 eliminates the definition and requirements for recognition of exit costs in Issue 94-3. This Statement also establishes that fair value is the objective for initial measurement of the liability. The provisions of SFAS 146 are effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002, with early application encouraged. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 146 to determine what impact, if any, SFAS 146 will have on its financial statements.

Inflation and Changing Prices

The Company’s sales and costs are subject to inflation and price fluctuations. However, they historically have not, and in the future are not expected to have, a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

Forward Looking Statements

When used in this quarterly report, the words “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects” and similar expressions are used to identify forward looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. The Company wishes to caution readers that the following important factors and others in some cases have affected and in the future could affect the Company’s actual results and could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward statements made by the Company: (i) economic conditions in the safety shoe market, (ii) availability of credit, (iii) increase in interest rates, (iv) cost of raw materials, (v) inability to maintain state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities, (vi) heightened competition, including intensification of price and service competition, the entry of new competitors and the introduction of new products by existing competitors, (vii) inability to capitalize on opportunities presented by industry consolidation, (viii) loss or retirement of key executives, (ix) loss or disruption of the Company’s relationships with its major suppliers, including the Company’s largest supplier in China and (x) inability to grow by acquisition of additional safety shoe distributors or to effectively consolidate operations of businesses acquired.

-18-

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

The Company is exposed to market risk primarily from changes in interest rates and foreign exchange rates.

The following discussion of the Company’s exposure to various market risks contains “forward looking statements” that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These projected results have been prepared utilizing certain assumptions considered reasonable in the circumstances and in light of information currently available to the Company. Nevertheless, because of the inherent unpredictability of interest rates and foreign currency translation rates, actual results could differ materially from those projected in such forward looking statements.

Interest Rates

At October 26, 2002, the Company had fixed-rate debt totaling $78.3 million in principal amount and having a fair value of $39.3 million. These instruments bear interest at a fixed rate and, therefore, do not expose the Company to the risk of earnings loss due to changes in market interest rates. However, the fair value of these instruments would decrease (to the holder) by approximately $3.1 million if interest rates were to increase by 10% from their levels at October 26, 2002 (i.e., an increase from the weighted average interest rate of 10.4% to a weighted average interest rate of 11.4%).

At October 26, 2002, the Company had variable-rate debt totaling $18.9 million in principal amount and having a fair value of $18.9 million. These borrowings are under the Bank Credit Facility. If interest rates were to increase by 10% from their levels at October 26, 2002, the Company would incur additional annual interest expense of approximately $0.1 million.

Foreign Exchange Rates

Information relating to the sensitivity to foreign currency exchange rate changes is omitted as foreign exchange exposure risk has not materially changed from that disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 26, 2002.

Within the 90 days prior to the date of filing this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its Disclosure Committee and management, including the President (Chief Executive Officer) and the Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 15d-14. Based upon that evaluation, the President (Chief Executive Officer) and the Treasurer (Chief Financial Officer) concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information relating to the Company (including its consolidated subsidiaries) required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings. Subsequent to the date of that evaluation, there have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls, nor were any corrective actions required with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

-19-

Table of Contents

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 2. Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

(a)  Exhibit Index.

-20-

Table of Contents

(b) Reports on Form 8-K.

     A report on Form 8-K was filed on September 27, 2002 to disclose the terms of the Bank Credit Facility that the Company completed on September 23, 2002, as discussed elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q.

-21-

Table of Contents

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

-22-

Table of Contents

CERTIFICATIONS

I, William J. Mills, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Iron Age Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

     (c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

-23-

Table of Contents

I, Bart R. Huchel, certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Iron Age Corporation;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

     (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and

     (c)  presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

     (a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6.     The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

-24-