Back to GetFilings.com
1
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[x] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934.
For the fiscal year ended September 30,1998.
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 .
For the transition period from to .
------ ------
Commission file number 333-28751
NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as it appears in its charter)
Wisconsin 39-1580331
(State or other jurisdiction of (IRS Employer ID Number)
Incorporation or organization)
2121 Brooks Avenue, P.O. Box 729, Neenah, Wisconsin 54957
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(920) 725-7000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONE
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
11 1/8% Series B Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2007
11 1/8% Series D Senior Subordinated Notes Due 2007
---------------------------------------------------
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practical date.
Common Stock, Class A, $100 par value- 1,000 shares as of December 22, 1998
Common Stock, Class B, $100 par value- 0 shares as of December 22, 1998
1
2
PART I
Item 1. BUSINESS
THE COMPANY (OTHER THAN THE RECENTLY ACQUIRED SUBSIDIARIES)
Overview
On April 30, 1997, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the
"Merger Agreement") with NC Merger Company and NFC Castings, Inc., Neenah
Corporation (the "Predecessor Company") was acquired by NFC Castings, Inc., a
holding company and wholly owned subsidiary of ACP Holding Company ("ACP
Holdings") (the "Merger"). Prior to July 1, 1997, Neenah Foundry Company was one
of three wholly owned subsidiaries of Neenah Corporation, a holding company with
no significant assets or operations other than its holdings in the common stock
of its three wholly owned subsidiaries. On July 1, 1997, Neenah Foundry Company
merged with and into Neenah Corporation and the surviving company changed its
name to Neenah Foundry Company (the "Company"). Unless otherwise stated in this
document or unless the context otherwise requires, references herein to the
"Company" include Neenah Foundry Company, Hartley Controls Corporation and
Neenah Transport, Inc., and exclude Deeter Foundry, Inc. ("Deeter"), Mercer
Forge Corporation ("Mercer"), Dalton Corporation ("Dalton"), and their
respective subsidiaries, each of which were acquired and Advanced Cast Products
("ACP") and its respective subsidiaries, whose capital stock was recently
contributed to the Company by ACP Holdings. Deeter, Mercer, Dalton and ACP are
referred to herein as the "Recently Acquired Subsidiaries." The Company changed
its fiscal year end to September 30 from March 31 effective September 30, 1997.
The Company, founded in 1872, is one of the largest manufacturers of a
wide range of high quality ductile and gray iron castings for the heavy
municipal market and selected segments of the industrial market. The Company
believes it is the largest manufacturer of heavy municipal iron castings in the
United States with approximately a 19% market share in calendar year 1997. The
Company's broad range of heavy municipal iron castings includes manhole covers
and frames, storm sewer frames and grates, heavy duty airport castings,
specialized trench drain castings, specialty flood control castings and
ornamental tree grates. These municipal castings are sold throughout the United
States to state and local government entities, utility companies, precast
concrete manhole structure producers and contractors for both new construction
and infrastructure replacement. The heavy municipal market generated
approximately 40% of the Company's net sales for the year ended September 30,
1998. The Company believes it is also a leading manufacturer of a wide range of
complex industrial castings, including castings for medium- and heavy-duty truck
drive line components, a broad range of castings for the farm equipment industry
and specific components for compressors used in heating, ventilation and air
conditioning systems. The industrial market generated approximately 57% of the
Company's net sales for the year ended September 30, 1998. In addition, the
Company engineers, manufactures and sells customized sand control systems and
related products, which are an essential part of the casting process, to other
iron foundries. Sales of these sand control systems and related products
represented approximately 3% of the Company's net sales for the year ended
September 30, 1998.
The Company currently operates two modern foundries with an annual
aggregate rated capacity of approximately 187,000 tons at a single site in
Neenah, Wisconsin. From 1985 to 1997, the Company invested approximately $100.0
million in its production facilities, with approximately $73 million invested in
a major plant modernization program from 1985 to 1990. This plant modernization
program was a critical part of a long-term strategy to produce higher volume,
value-added castings for its existing industrial customers and to penetrate
other selected segments of the industrial market, while preserving its position
as the leader in the heavy municipal market. This modernization program entailed
the closing of the Company's oldest foundry, Plant 1, and the updating of the
Company's other two foundries, Plants 2 and 3, which enabled the Company both to
produce higher volume, complex castings for selected industrial segments and to
improve the Company's cost position in the heavy municipal market. Following the
completion of the modernization program, the Company has steadily decreased its
production of lower margin products such as axle covers and brake drums and
increased the production of higher margin, more
2
3
complex parts, such as transmission and axle housings. As a result of this
strategy, the Company's ongoing improvements in its manufacturing process and
increased demand for medium- and heavy-duty truck components have caused net
sales and EBITDA to increase.
Products, Customers and Markets
The Company provides a variety of products to both the heavy municipal and
industrial markets. The following table sets forth certain information regarding
the end-user markets served by the Company, the products produced by the
Company, representative customers in each end-user market and the percentage of
net sales attributable to each of the Company's markets for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1998 and for the Pro forma six months ended September 30,
1997.
Percentage of Net
Sales(1)
----------------------------------------------
Pro forma Fiscal Year
Representative Six Months Ended
Market End Product Customers September 30, 1997 (2) September 30, 1998
------ ----------- --------- ---------------------- ------------------
Heavy Municipal Standard castings, including State and local 46.5% 40.7%
storm and sanitary sewer government
castings, manhole covers and entities, utility
frames, storm sewer frames companies, precast
and grates; Specialty concrete structure
castings, including heavy producers and
duty airport castings, contractors (3)
specialized trench drain
castings, specialty flood
control castings and
ornamental tree grates
Industrial
Medium- and
Heavy-Duty
Truck Differential carriers and Rockwell 33.8% 37.3%
cases, brackets, cages, International
calipers, caps, carriers, Eaton Corp.
hubs, knuckles, transmission Dana Corp
housings, yokes
Farm
Equipment Various gear housings, planet John Deere 15.8% 16.0%
carrier, axle housings, New Holland
planting and harvesting
equipment parts,
counterweights
Other
Industrial Compressor components, Aisin 3.9% 6.0%
various housing and gear cases The Trane
Company
(1) Net sales include sales of Neenah Foundry Company only.
(2) The Company changed its fiscal year to September 30 from March 31 effective
September 30, 1997.
(3) No municipal customer represented more than 1.5% of Neenah Foundry Company's
net sales for the pro forma six months ended September 30, 1997 or the
fiscal year ended September 30, 1998.
3
4
Heavy Municipal. Based on industry reported data, the Company believes it
is the largest manufacturer of heavy municipal iron castings in the United
States with an estimated 19% market share in calendar year 1997. The Company's
broad heavy municipal product line consists of two general categories of
castings, "standard" and "specialty" castings. Standard castings principally
consist of storm and sanitary sewer castings that are consistent with
pre-existing dimension and strength specifications established by local
authorities. Standard castings are generally high volume items that are
routinely used in new construction and infrastructure replacement. Specialty
castings are generally lower volume, higher margin products which include
heavy-duty airport castings, trench drain castings, flood control castings,
special manhole and inlet castings and ornamental tree grates. These specialty
items are frequently selected and/or specified from the Company's municipal
product catalog and its tree grate catalog, which together encompass over 4,400
standard and specialty patterns. For many of these specialty products, the
Company believes it is the only manufacturer with existing patterns to produce
such a particular casting, although a competing manufacturer could elect to make
the investment in patterns or equipment necessary to produce a similar casting.
The Company's municipal castings are sold to state and local government
entities, utility companies, pre-cast concrete manhole structure producers and
contractors for both new construction and infrastructure replacement. The
Company's 17,000 active municipal customers generally make purchase decisions
based on a number of criteria, including acceptability of the product per local
specification, quality, service, price and the customer's relationship with the
foundry. Relative to customers in the industrial market, municipal market
customers are less technically demanding and rely more on published product
specifications to ensure product performance.
A key aspect of winning orders in the heavy municipal market is the
specification process in which a local authority or design engineer sets
specific criteria for the casting or castings to be used in a particular
project. Those criteria then become part of the formal plans and specifications
that will govern the acceptability of castings for a particular project. The
Company seeks to be an active participant in the specification process. Its
sales staff makes frequent calls on design engineers as part of a continuous
effort to stay abreast of current specifications and upcoming projects. In these
sales calls, the Company seeks to create opportunities for the selection of
specifications which utilize an existing Company pattern. Although in many cases
the design engineer who sets the specification does not make the purchase
decision, when the Company's specialty product is specified it becomes more
difficult for another manufacturer to provide an alternate part which is
considered acceptable. The Company's professional sales staff and product
engineering department are highly regarded by design engineers and are
frequently consulted during the specification drafting process. The Company
believes its reputation for its product engineering support, consistent quality
and reliable service have made the Company's municipal and tree grate catalogs
two of the most frequently used specification design tools in the municipal
casting industry.
Over the past three years, the Company has introduced what it calls
"lightweighted" parts to the heavy municipal market. These lightweighted parts
have been reengineered in order to reduce both their weight and amount of raw
materials necessary for their manufacture, while maintaining the high quality
performance characteristics of the heavier version of the casting. This
improvement in the design and manufacture of municipal castings has resulted in
lower material costs and improved margins for this product line. The Company is
able to manufacture lightweighted castings because its manufacturing processes
enable it to refine castings walls down to very narrow tolerances, many of
which, the Company believes, are currently not achievable by the its
competitors. While only a portion of the municipal castings the Company sells
are candidates for lightweighting, the Company expects to continue to increase
the number of lightweighted castings which it offers for sale over the next
several years.
4
5
Industrial. The Company believes it is a leading manufacturer of a wide
range of complex industrial castings, including castings for medium- and
heavy-duty truck drive line components and farm equipment as well as castings
for specific components for compressors used in heating, venting and air
conditioning (HVAC) systems. The Company's industrial castings have increased in
complexity since the early 1990's and are generally produced in higher volumes
than municipal castings. Complexity in the industrial market is determined by
the intricacy of a casting's shape, the thinness of its walls and the amount of
processing by a customer required before a part is suitable for use by it.
Original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and their first tier suppliers have been
demanding higher complexity parts principally to reduce labor costs in their own
production processes by using fewer parts to manufacture the same finished
product or assembly and by using parts which require less preparation before
entering the production process.
The Company's industrial castings are primarily sold to a limited number of
customers with whom the Company has established a close working relationship.
The Company has sold to certain industrial customers for over 20 years and
currently has multi-year arrangements with certain of those customers. These
customers make purchasing decisions based on, among other things, technical
ability, price, service, quality assurance systems, facility capabilities and
reputation. However, as in the municipal market, the Company's assistance in
product engineering plays an important role in winning bids for industrial
castings. The average industrial casting typically takes between 12 and 18
months to go from the design phase to full production and has an average product
life cycle of approximately 8 to 10 years. The patterns for industrial castings,
unlike the patterns for municipal castings, are owned by the Company's customers
rather than the Company. However, such industrial patterns are not readily
transferable to other foundries without, in most cases, significant additional
investment. Although foundries, including the Company, do not design industrial
castings, a close working relationship between a foundry and the customer during
a product launch is critical to reduce potential production problems and
minimize the customer's risk of incurring lost sales or reputation damage due to
a delayed launch. Involvement by a foundry early in the design process generally
improves the likelihood that the customer will design a casting within the
manufacturing capabilities of such foundry and also improves the likelihood that
such foundry will be awarded the casting for full production.
The Company estimates that it has historically retained approximately 90%
of the castings it has been awarded throughout the product life cycle, which is
typical for the industry. The Company believes industrial customers will
continue to seek out foundries with a strong reputation for performance who are
capable of providing a cost-effective combination of manufacturing technology
and quality. The Company's strategy is to further its relationships with
existing customers by participating in the design and production of more complex
industrial castings, while seeking out selected new customers who would value
the Company's performance reputation, technical ability and high level of
quality and service.
In addition to increasing its sales to existing customers and seeking out
new customers, the Company intends to explore opportunities in austempering and
machining and assembling sub-components for specific industrial customers.
Austempering is the process of heat treating a ductile iron casting to increase
its strength, thereby increasing the casting's ability to replace steel in
additional applications. Machining and sub-assembling are value-added processes
often performed by the OEM or third parties. Austempering and machining and
sub-assembly are both processes which generally provide higher margins and
increase a customer's reliance on the manufacturer.
5
6
Sales and Marketing
Heavy Municipal. Over its 70 years of heavy municipal market participation,
the Company has emphasized sales and marketing and believes it has built a
strong reputation for customer service. The Company believes that it is one of
the leaders in U.S. heavy municipal casting production and that it has strong
name recognition. The Company has the largest sales and marketing effort of any
foundry serving the heavy municipal market, including 51 Company employees and
24 commissioned representatives. The dedicated sales force works out of regional
sales offices to market the Company's municipal castings to contractors and
state and local governmental entities throughout the United States. The Company
operates nine regional distribution and sales centers and has two other sales
offices in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma and Norwood, Pennsylvania. The Company
believes this regional approach enhances its knowledge of local specifications
and its position in the heavy municipal market.
Industrial. The Company employs a dedicated industrial casting sales force
of six people, five based in Neenah, Wisconsin and one based in Mansfield, Ohio.
These six people consist of three account coordinators, who support the ongoing
customer relationships and organize the scheduling and delivery of shipments,
and three major account managers, who work with customers' engineers and
procurement representatives, Company engineers, manufacturing management and
quality assurance representatives throughout all stages of the production
process to ensure that the final product consistently meets or exceeds customer
specifications. This team approach, consisting of sales, marketing,
manufacturing, engineering and quality assurance efforts is an integral part of
the Company's marketing strategy.
Manufacturing Process
The Company operates two modern foundries with an annual rated capacity of
approximately 187,000 tons at a single location in Neenah, Wisconsin. The
Company's foundries manufacture gray and ductile iron and cast it into intricate
shapes according to customer metallurgical and dimensional specifications. From
1985 to 1997, the Company invested approximately $100 million in its production
facilities, with approximately $73 million invested from 1985 to 1990 in plant
modernization and new equipment. The Company also continually invests in the
improvement of process controls and product performance and believes that these
investments and its significant experience in the industry have made it one of
the most efficient manufacturers of industrial and heavy municipal casting
products. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998, the Company had a
combined scrap rate of 2.3%.
The casting process involves using metal, wood or urethane patterns to make
an impression of a casting product in a mold made primarily of sand. Cores, also
made primarily of sand, are used to make the internal cavities and openings in a
casting product. Once the casting impression is made in the mold, the cores are
set into the mold and the mold is closed. Molten metal is then poured into the
mold, which fills the mold cavity and takes on the shape of the desired casting
product. Once the iron has solidified and cooled, the mold is shaken from the
casting and the sand is recycled. The selection of the appropriate casting
method, pattern, core-making equipment and sand and other raw materials depends
on the final product, including its complexity, specifications, and function as
well as intended production volumes. Because the casting process involves many
critical variables, such as choice of raw materials, design and production of
tooling, iron chemistry and metallurgy, and core and molding sand properties, it
is important to monitor the process parameters closely to ensure dimensional
precision and metallurgical consistency.
6
7
The Company continually seeks to find ways to expand the capabilities of
existing technology to improve manufacturing processes. An example of this
expansion is the Company's integration of Disamatic molding machines into its
operations. Disamatic molding machines are considered to be among the most
efficient sand molding machines because of their ability to produce high quality
molds at high production rates. Disamatic molding machines are also used by most
of the Company's direct competitors. Although the Company was not the first
foundry to acquire Disamatic molding machines, it has significantly enhanced the
equipment's range of production by combining the equipment with core-setting
capabilities which exceed those of most foundries. To further improve upon the
productivity of the Disamatic molding machines, the Company has recently
increased the length of two of its cooling lines, making each line among the
longest lines in the world for comparable Disamatic equipment. This extension
allows the Company to run its machines at higher production rates while
providing sufficient in-mold cooling time prior to mold shakeout to facilitate
the production of high quality castings. As a result of these and other similar
efforts, the Company has been able to increase productivity as measured in the
number of molds per hour.
The Company also achieves productivity gains by improving upon the
individual steps of the casting process such as reducing the amount of time
required to make a pattern change to produce a different casting product. The
reduced time permits it to profitably produce castings in medium volume
quantities on high volume, cost-effective equipment such as the Disamatic
molding machines. Additionally, extensive effort in real time process controls
permits the Company to produce a consistent, dimensionally accurate casting
product, which requires less time and effort in the final processing stages of
production. This accuracy contributes significantly to the Company's
manufacturing efficiency.
Quality Assurance
Continual testing and monitoring of the manufacturing process is important
to maintain product quality. The Company has adopted sophisticated quality
assurance techniques and policies for its manufacturing operations. During and
after the casting process, the Company performs numerous tests, including
tensile, proof-load, radiography, ultrasonic, magnetic particle and chemical
analysis. The Company utilizes statistical process controls to measure and
control significant process variables and casting dimensions. The results of
this testing are documented in metallurgical certifications, which are provided
with each shipment to most industrial customers. The Company strives to maintain
systems that provide for continual improvement of operations and personnel,
emphasize defect prevention and reduce variation and waste in all areas.
Distribution
The Company sells a substantial amount of its municipal castings through its
network of two warehouses, nine distribution and sales centers and two other
sales offices. Industrial castings are shipped direct to customers from the
Company. For many municipal and a small portion of its industrial customers,
castings are delivered by Neenah Transport, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of
the Company ("Neenah Transport"), which operates a fleet of 28 tractors and 101
trailers that deliver products throughout the Midwest. For sales outside of the
Midwest, increased transportation costs impact the ability of the Company to
compete on a cost basis. Neenah Transport also backhauls raw materials for use
by the Company on return trips. Neenah Transport is staffed with professional
drivers who are trained in service standards and product knowledge as
representatives of the Company. To the Company's knowledge, none the Company's
major heavy municipal competitors have a captive transportation subsidiary. The
Company believes Neenah Transport's service and drivers provide another
differentiating factor in favor of the Company as compared to other major heavy
municipal manufacturers.
7
8
Raw Materials
The primary raw materials used by the Company to manufacture ductile and
gray iron castings are steel scrap, pig iron, metallurgical coke and silica
sand. While there are multiple suppliers for each of these commodities, the
Company has single-source arrangements with its for each of these major raw
materials, with the exception of pig iron. Due to long standing relationships
with each of its suppliers, the Company believes that it will continue to be
able to secure raw materials at competitive prices. The primary energy sources
for the Company's operations, electricity and natural gas, are purchased through
utilities.
Although the prices of all raw materials used by the Company vary, the
fluctuations in the price of steel scrap are the most significant to the
Company. The Company has arrangements with most of its industrial customers
which require the Company to adjust industrial casting prices to reflect scrap
price fluctuations. In periods of rapidly rising or falling scrap prices, these
adjustments will lag the current scrap price because they are generally based on
average market prices for prior periods, which periods vary by customer but are
generally no longer than six months. Castings are generally sold to the heavy
municipal market on a bid basis and, after a bid is won, the price for the
municipal casting generally cannot be adjusted for raw material price increases.
However, in most cases the Company believes it has been successful in obtaining
higher municipal casting unit prices in subsequent bids to compensate for rises
in scrap prices in prior periods. Rapidly fluctuating scrap prices may have an
adverse or positive effect on the Company's financial condition and results of
operations.
Competition
The markets for the Company's products are highly competitive. Competition
is based not only on price, but also on quality of product, range of capability,
level of service and reliability of delivery. The Company competes with numerous
independent and captive foundries, as well as with a number of foreign iron
foundries, including certain foundries located in India. The Company also
competes with several large domestic manufacturers whose products are made with
materials other than ductile and gray iron, such as steel or aluminum. The
industry consolidation that has occurred over the past 20 years has resulted in
a significant reduction in the number of smaller foundries and a rise in the
share of production by larger foundries, some of which have significantly
greater financial resources than the Company. Competition from India has had a
strong presence in the heavy municipal market and continues to be a factor,
primarily in the western and eastern United States, due in part to costs
associated with transportation. However, foreign companies have been, and
continue to be, subject to antidumping and countervailing duty enforcement
litigation which the Company believes has had a negative effect on foreign
companies' ability to compete in the U.S. markets. There can be no assurance
that these factors will continue to mitigate the impact of foreign competition,
or that the Company will be able to maintain or improve its competitive position
in the markets in which it competes.
8
9
Hartley Controls Corporation
Hartley Controls Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
("Hartley Controls"), engineers, manufactures and sells customized sand control
systems, which are an essential part of the casting process, to other iron
foundries. The sand molding media used in all high production iron foundries is
a critical element in determining mold quality. Exacting and consistent control
of this sand with respect to moisture and chemical additives is an essential
element for process control and relates directly to casting quality, scrap rate
and the ability to produce complex molds for highly engineered castings. Harley
Controls is a major U.S. supplier of sand control systems with over 300
installations since 1986. Harley Controls has made investments in process
technology and has several patented technologies related to sand systems,
including the "Automatic Moisture Controller," the "Even-Flo Bin," the
"Automatic Compactibility Tester," the "Automatic Bond Determinator," the "Green
Stand Reconditioner" and the "Sandman." Sales of these sand systems and related
products represented approximately 3% of the Company's net sales for the year
ended September 30, 1998.
Employees
As of September 30, 1998 the Company had 970 full time employees, of whom
761 were hourly employees and 209 were salaried employees. The Local 121B of the
Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers International Union AFL-CIO
is the major bargaining agent for the representative of 726 of the Company's
hourly employees. A collective bargaining agreement with Local 121B was reached
on January 1, 1996 and expires on December 31, 1998. The Independent
Patternmakers Union of Neenah, Wisconsin is the major bargaining agent for and
representative of 35 of the Company's hourly employees. A collective bargaining
agreement with the Independent Patternmakers Union was reached on January 1,
1998 and expires on December 31, 2000. The Company believes that it has a good
relationship with its employees.
Environmental Matters
Each of the Company's and Recently Acquired Subsidiaries' facilities are
subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to the
protection of the environment and worker health and safety, including those
relating to discharges to air, water and land, the handling and disposal of
solid and hazardous waste and the cleanup of properties affected by hazardous
substances. Such laws include the Federal Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act,
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 ("CERCLA"), and the
Occupational Health and Safety Act. The Company believes that its and each of
the Recently Acquired Subsidiaries' operations are currently in substantial
compliance with applicable environmental laws, and that it has no liabilities
arising under such environmental laws, except as would not be expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Company's or any of the Recently Acquired
Subsidiaries' operations, financial condition or competitive position. However,
some risk of environmental liability and other costs is inherent in each of the
Company's and Recently Acquired Subsidiaries' businesses. Any of the Company or
the Recently Acquired Subsidiaries might in the future incur significant costs
to meet current or more stringent compliance, cleanup or other obligations
pursuant to environmental requirements. Such costs may include expenditures
related to remediation of historical releases of hazardous substances or
clean-up of physical structures prior to decommissioning.
Under the Federal Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, the Environmental
Protection Agency ("EPA") is directed to establish maximum achievable control
technology ("MACT") standards for certain industrial operations that are major
sources of hazardous air pollutants ("HAPs"). The iron foundry industry is not
expected to be required to implement the MACT emission limits, control
technologies or work practices until the year 2003 at the earliest. Although the
Company cannot accurately estimate the costs to comply with the MACT standard
until it is issued, the MACT standard, when implemented, and state laws
governing the emission of toxic air pollutants may require that certain of the
Company's or the Recently Acquired Subsidiaries' facilities incur significant
costs for air emission control equipment, air emission monitoring equipment or
process modifications.
9
10
RECENT ACQUISITIONS
On March 30, 1998, the Company acquired all the capital stock of
Deeter for $24.3 million (excluding fees and expenses incurred in connection
with the acquisition of $0.3 million), consisting of $20.4 million of cash and a
$3.9 million seller note (the "Deeter Seller Note"). The Deeter Seller Note,
which does not bear interest, was issued to the selling shareholders of Deeter
by ACP Holdings and matures on March 30, 1999. Payment of the principal amount
of the Deeter Seller Note is supported by a letter of credit issued under the
Senior Bank Facilities. The Company financed the cash portion of the
consideration and all fees and expenses from cash on hand. Since 1945, Deeter
has been producing gray iron castings for the heavy municipal market. Deeter's
municipal casting product line includes manhole frames and covers, storm sewer
inlet frames, grates and curbs, trench grating and tree grates. Deeter also
produces a wide variety of special application construction castings. These
products are utilized in waste treatment plants, airports, telephone and
electrical construction projects.
On April 3, 1998, the Company acquired all the capital stock of Mercer for
$47.0 million in cash (excluding fees and expenses incurred in connection with
the acquisition of $0.5 million). Concurrently with the acquisition of Mercer,
the Company, ACP Holdings and the lenders party thereto amended and restated the
Credit Agreement (the "Credit Agreement") dated April 30, 1997, as amended and
restated on September 12, 1997. The Credit Agreement, as so amended and
restated, provided availability of $75.0 million of term loans to the Company
(consisting of $20.0 million of Tranche A Loans (as defined) and $55.0 million
of Tranche B Loans (as defined) in addition to the Company's existing $50.0
million Revolving Credit Facility (as defined). On April 3, 1998, the Company
borrowed $55.0 million of the Tranche B Loans, of which $48.6 million was used
to finance the acquisition of Mercer, to pay fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the acquisition and to pay financing costs. The available
Tranche A Loans were not borrowed on April 3, 1998. Founded in 1954, Mercer is a
leading producer of complex-shaped forged components for use in transportation,
railroad, mining and heavy industrial applications. Mercer is also a leading
producer of microalloy forgings. Mercer sells directly to OEMs, as well as to
industrial end users.
On September 8, 1998, the Company acquired all the capital stock of Dalton
for $102.0 million in cash (excluding fees and expenses incurred in connection
with the acquisition of $0.6 million). Dalton manufactures and sells gray iron
castings for refrigeration systems, air conditioners, heavy equipment, engines,
gear boxes, stationary transmissions, heavy duty truck transmissions and other
automotive parts.
On September 8, 1998, the capital stock of ACP was contributed to the
Company by ACP Holdings. In connection with the contribution, the Company
assumed $14.9 million of indebtedness of ACP, $14.6 million of which was
refinanced with borrowings under the Senior Bank Facilities. ACP is a leading
independent manufacturer of ductile and malleable iron castings that are
produced through both traditional casting methods and through ACP's Evapcast
lost foam casting process. ACP's production capabilities also include a range of
finishing operations including austempering and machining. ACP sells its
products primarily to companies in the heavy truck, construction equipment,
railroad, mining, electrical fittings and automotive industries.
In connection with the acquisition of Dalton and the contribution of the
capital stock of ACP, the Company, ACP Holdings and the lenders party thereto
amended and restated the Credit Agreement to provide availability of additional
Tranche B Loans in an aggregate principal amount of $70.0 million and an
Acquisition Loan Facility (as defined) in an aggregate principal amount
outstanding at any one time not to exceed $50.0 million. In connection with the
acquisition of Dalton and the contribution of the capital stock of ACP, the
Company borrowed $29.0 million under the Acquisition Loan Facility, $20.0
million of Tranche A Loans and $70.0 million of Tranche B Loans.
10
11
Currently, each of the Recently Acquired Subsidiaries is operating as a
separate subsidiary of the Company with independent operations under the
direction of the management that was in place prior to its acquisition by the
Company. Although the Company currently does not have plans to integrate the
operations of the Company with the Recently Acquired Subsidiaries, it may to
some extent do so in the future.
Each of the Deeter, Mercer and Dalton acquisitions were accounted for using
the purchase method of accounting. The acquisition of ACP was accounted for at
historical cost in a manner similar to that in pooling of interest accounting
since the Company and ACP were under common control. Accordingly, prior period
financial statements of the Company for the period during which the Company and
ACP were under common ownership have been restated to reflect the contribution
of capital stock of ACP to the Company.
The foregoing transactions are herein referred to as the "Recent Acquisitions."
The credit facilities available under the Credit Agreement are collectively
referred to herein as the "Senior Bank Facilities".
11
12
DALTON CORPORATION
Overview
Dalton manufactures and sells gray iron castings for refrigeration systems,
air conditioners, heavy equipment, engines, gear boxes, stationary
transmissions, heavy duty truck transmissions and other automotive parts.
Dalton's four operating facilities have each been structured to manufacture or
machine specific components to customer specifications. Dalton specializes in
using cold box and shell core products as well as precision high-pressure molds
to manufacture gray iron castings. The majority of Dalton's castings range in
size from one pound to 700 pounds.
Products and Markets
During calendar years 1996 and 1997, Dalton produced 180,848 and 192,495
tons of castings, respectively. In the nine months ended September 30, 1998,
Dalton produced 159,728 tons of castings. Dalton's revenues are generated from
customers in several industries, however, refrigeration and air conditioning
represent the largest concentration of tons shipped, which management estimates
was approximately 45% of tons shipped in calendar year 1997, followed by
automotive/light truck and heavy truck, each of which management estimates was
between 10% and 15% of tons shipped in calendar year 1997. Dalton serves
primarily three markets: refrigeration and air conditioning, automotive/truck
market and heavy equipment.
Customers
Dalton has over 100 customers across several industries, with four of
Dalton's largest five customers operating in the refrigeration/air conditioning
industry. Dalton's largest 10 customers accounted for approximately 62% of
Dalton's calendar year 1997 net sales. Dalton's largest customer, Copeland
Corporation, accounted for approximately 17% of Dalton's calendar year 1997 net
sales and Dalton's top three customers accounted for approximately 37% of
Dalton's net sales during the same period.
Raw Materials
The primary raw materials used by Dalton to manufacture iron castings are
steel scrap, pig iron, metallurgical coke and silica sand. While there are
multiple suppliers for each of these commodities, Dalton has sourcing
arrangements with its suppliers of each of these major raw materials, with the
exception of pig iron. Due to long standing relationships with each of its
suppliers, Dalton believes that it will continue to be able to secure raw
materials from its suppliers at competitive prices. The primary energy sources
for Dalton's operations, electricity and natural gas, are purchased through
utilities.
Although the prices of all raw materials used by Dalton vary, the
fluctuations in the price of steel scrap are the most significant to Dalton.
Dalton has arrangements with most of its industrial customers which require
Dalton to adjust industrial casting prices to reflect scrap price fluctuations.
In periods of rapidly rising or falling scrap prices, these adjustments will lag
the current scrap price because they are generally based on average market
prices for prior periods, which periods vary by customer but are generally no
longer than six months. Rapidly fluctuating scrap prices may have a temporary
adverse or positive effect on the Dalton's results of operations.
Competition
Dalton operates in the same industry as the Company and therefore faces the
same competitive environment as the company. See "-The Company (other than the
Recently
12
13
Acquired Subsidiaries)-Competition."
Manufacturing Facilities
Dalton currently operates four facilities. The main plant, located in
Warsaw, Indiana ("Warsaw") was established in 1910. Between 1992 and 1995 Dalton
acquired a second plant in Kendallville, Indiana ("Kendallville") and a third
plant in Ashland, Ohio ("Ashland"). In addition, in 1997 Dalton acquired the
remaining 50 percent interest in a machining facility located in Stryker, Ohio
("Stryker"). Dalton has established a separate headquarters and office facility
in Warsaw, Indiana.
Employees
At September 30, 1998, Dalton employed 1,638 individuals, consisting of
1,336 hourly employees and 302 salaried and clerical employees.
Almost all of Dalton's production employees are members of either the Steel
Workers' Union or the Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers
International Union. A collective bargaining agreement is negotiated every three
to five years. The current agreements expire as follows: Warsaw, April 2003;
Kendallville, July 25, 1999; and Ashland, April 26, 1999. Management believes
that employee relations are good.
13
14
Environmental Matters
Dalton is subject to environmental, health and safety laws comparable to
those governing the Company. See "-The Company (other than the Recently Acquired
Subsidiaries)-Environmental Matters."
Status of Dalton's Air Emission Compliance In connection with Dalton's
submission of draft operating permits for air emission sources at its facilities
in Warsaw and Kendallville under Title V of the federal Clean Air Act Amendments
of 1990 ("Title V"), the Indiana Department of Environmental Management ("IDEM")
has asked Dalton to address several issues of concern: (i) alleged exceedances
of particulate and volatile organic compound emission levels; (ii) the
applicability of Prevention of Significant Deterioration ("PSD") permit review
requirements; and (iii) alleged construction and operation of sources without
the required permits. Depending on the results of ongoing discussions with IDEM
and the course of developing regulations, the costs of addressing Dalton's air
emission control issues could be material.
Dalton has retained an environmental consultant to address the concerns
identified by IDEM. IDEM may require Dalton to perform tests on various emission
sources, install new or upgrade existing emission capture or control equipment,
use substitute materials or modify production rates to reduce regulated
emissions and/or perform PSD review for several sources. IDEM could also assess
penalties against Dalton for the identified concerns, but because the concerns
were voluntarily disclosed to IDEM by Dalton in the Title V permit applications
for these facilities, management believes that any penalties assessed by IDEM
will not be material.
Warsaw Monofill NOVs On May 15, 1998, IDEM issued an NOV to Dalton
regarding Dalton's operation of an authorized landfill used exclusively by the
Warsaw facility to dispose of its foundry waste (the ""monofill"). IDEM issued
the NOV after Dalton notified the agency that it had disposed of materials
outside the authorized landfill area. IDEM is currently reviewing Dalton's
request to modify the landfill permit and allow the disposal of wastes in the
overfilled locations. IDEM is seeking a civil penalty of $100,000 to $150,000
from Dalton to resolve the NOV. Dalton could be required to relocate the
overfill material to an authorized off-site disposal location if IDEM denies the
pending request for permit modification.
ADVANCED CAST PRODUCTS, INC.
Overview
ACP is headquartered in Dublin, Ohio. ACP produces its products through
three principal facilities. The largest operation, Meadville, manufactures
ductile iron castings through both the traditional green sand molding process
and its proprietary Evapcast lost foam casting process. The Belcher operation
manufactures malleable cast iron parts primarily for the electrical fittings
industry. Finally, the Peerless operation produces bearing adapters for use in
rail cars. Peerless is one of only three U.S. companies that manufacture
railroad bearing adapters. Since 1990, ACP has generated gradually increasing
sales and operating income primarily due to increased volume of products
shipped.
Products and Markets
ACP is a leading independent manufacturer of ductile and malleable iron
castings that are produced through both traditional casting methods and through
ACP's Evapcast lost foam
14
15
casting process. ACP's production capabilities also include a range of finishing
operations including austempering and machining. ACP sells its products
primarily to companies in the heavy truck, construction equipment, railroad,
mining, electrical fittings and automotive industries.
Evapcast and CasTuf are two of ACP's proprietary casting processes.
Evapcast utilizes lost foam molding technology to produce near net-shape
castings, which allow for tighter tolerances, a smoother surface and enhanced
part complexity and require significantly less machining. CasTuf process
produces austempered ductile iron castings with superior strength
characteristics. CasTuf replaces more expensive steel castings, forgings and
fabrications, providing increased design flexibility. Management believes that
ACP is the first and only ductile foundry in the U.S. with its own in-house
austemper furnace and is one of only two ductile iron foundries to have
developed the lost-foam casting process. ACP is also a leading provider of
in-house machined castings through its expanded machining capability, which
utilizes state-of-the-art CNC machines.
ACP's products and processes have enabled the company to develop long-term
working relationships with many key customers. This has allowed ACP to retain
existing customers, build on its customer base and obtain favorable pricing.
Customers
ACP serves a diverse base of approximately 400 customers. Freightliner
Corporation, ACP's largest customer, accounted for more than 16% of ACP's net
sales for its fiscal year ended September 30, 1998. ACP specializes in meeting
the more difficult requirements of its largest customers such as Caterpillar,
Freightliner and Dana. ACP has been presented supplier awards from each of these
OEMs and has earned the ability to obtain new part awards as they become
available.
ACP works closely with its customers from the beginning of the design
process until the shipment of finished parts. Due to this level of customer
service along with its products and services, ACP has been able to increase
sales to existing customers as well as expand its customer base. ACP offers its
customers a package, which includes casting, austempering, machining, painting
and assembly. This combination of products and services reduces the risk of ACP
customers moving their products to other manufacturers.
Raw Materials
The primary raw materials used by ACP to manufacture iron castings are
steel scrap, alloys and silica sand. While there are multiple suppliers for each
of these commodities, ACP has sourcing arrangements with its suppliers of each
of these major raw materials. Due to long standing relationships with each of
its suppliers, ACP believes that it will continue to be able to secure raw
materials from its suppliers at competitive prices. The primary energy sources
for ACP's operations, electricity and natural gas, are purchased through
utilities and competitive third party bidding.
Although the prices of all raw materials used by ACP vary over time, the
fluctuations in the price of steel scrap are the most significant to ACP. ACP
has arrangements with most of its industrial customers which allow ACP to adjust
industrial casting prices to reflect scrap price fluctuations.
15
16
Competition
ACP operates in the same industry as the Company and therefore faces the
same competitive environment as the Company. See "-The Company (other than the
Recently Acquired Subsidiaries)-Competition."
Manufacturing Facilities
ACP currently operates 3 facilities. Since 1989, ACP has spent over $14.0
million on capital equipment to expand production capacity, improve efficiency,
add new production capabilities, replace equipment and improve the quality of
its products. ACP investments have included, for example, state of the art
Disamatic molding lines at both its Meadville and Belcher facilities and
computer numerical controlled ("CNC") machining centers at Meadville. The new
molding lines have increased capacity and reduced operating costs.
In addition, new capital expenditures are underway for Meadville that
include an autopour unit for its current Disamatic line, a larger Disamatic
molding line for larger castings, a second austemper line, and additional CNC
machines. Belcher's new capital expenditures also include an autopour unit in
addition to a heat treat furnace. Peerless is adding a new CNC machining center.
Employees
ACP has approximately 90 salaried and approximately 370 hourly employees
represented by the United Steelworkers of America. The collective bargaining
agreement for Belcher and Meadville expires in June 1999 and in October 1999,
respectively.
Environmental Matters
ACP is subject to environmental, health and safety laws comparable to those
governing the Company. See "-The Company (other than the Recently Acquired
Subsidiaries)-Environmental Matters."
Intellectual Property
Meadville holds trademark rights on two advanced proprietary processes,
Evapcast and CasTuf. ACP's Evapcast process utilizes a lost foam casting
technique which produces near net shape castings. Evapcast eliminates or reduces
the need for coring and machining resulting in significant cost savings to the
customer. CasTuf is a process to produce a line of austempered ductile iron
castings which have superior strength characteristics and are easier to cast
than steel products, thus providing greater design freedom. Meadville is the
only ductile iron casting company in North America with in-house austempering
capabilities (CasTuf) and one of only two independent, ductile iron foundries
with lost foam technology (EvapCast). Additionally, Meadville was one of the
first foundry operations to provide completely finished parts through an
integrated machining capability.
16
17
MERCER FORGE CORPORATION
Overview
Founded in 1954, Mercer is a leading producer of complex-shaped forged
components for use in transportation, railroad, mining and heavy industrial
applications. Mercer is also a leading producer of microalloy forgings. Mercer
sells directly to OEMs, as well as to industrial end users.
Until the mid-1980's, Mercer produced military tank parts, but successfully
converted from a defense contractor to a commercial manufacturer and today is
one of the leading suppliers to the heavy duty truck sector. Mercer produces
approximately 500 individually forged components and has developed specialized
expertise in forgings of microalloy steel which management estimates accounts
for approximately 40% of its production.
Products and Markets
Mercer designs its products to customer specification with typical
production runs of 1,000 or more units. Mercer currently operates eight
mechanical press lines, from 1,300 tons to 4,000 tons. Mercer's principal plant
is a 130,000 square foot facility located in Mercer, Pennsylvania. Key markets
for Mercer include truck and automotive parts, railroad equipment and general
industrial machinery.
The following is a summary of Mercer's product capabilities, broken out by
the principal customer categories it serves:
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INDUSTRY PRODUCTS
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Truck Drive Train Components; Sector Shafts; Knuckles,
Spindles; King Pins
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Automotive Transmission Gears; Hubs, Front Wheel Universal
Components; Drive Train Yokes; Spindles
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mining Equipment Shoes; Fight Bars; Gear Blanks; Hubs; Sleeves
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Railroad Wheels; Draft Gear Components; Tank Car Valves; Piston
Carries; Articulated Car Bearings; Connecting Rods
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Off-Highway/ Yokes; Spindles; Flanges; Gear Blanks; Hubs; Track
Agriculture Links; Roller Shafts; Drive Line Components
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industrial Gears; Bearings; Wheels; Cams
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Military Ordinance Projectile Components; Missile Components; Center
Guides; End Connectors; Tank Track Components
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Forged Components Market
Demand for forged products for civilian application closely follows the
general business cycle and the level demand for capital goods. While there is a
consistent base level of demand for replacement parts which is somewhat
inelastic, the strongest expansions in the forging industry coincide with
periods of economic growth. With generally improved economic conditions and a
boom in the transportation sector, Mercer and most other domestic forgers are
currently experiencing growing demand for their products.
Once Mercer's principal products, military forgings currently represent
less than five percent of Mercer's total output. Mercer operates two of its
eight forges under contracts with the U.S. Government, but no longer actively
bids for defense contracts. During the 1990-92 Gulf
17
18
War period, Mercer was active in producing ordnance components. Management
anticipates, however, that military products will continue to account for an
increasingly smaller proportion of its overall production.
Manufacturing Process
Forgings and casting (together with a third process, fabrication) are the
principal commercial metal working processes. In forging, metal is pressed,
pounded or squeezed under great pressure, with or without the use of heat, into
parts that retain the metal's original grain flow, imparting high strength,
ductility and resistance properties.
Forging itself usually entails one of four principal process: impression
die; open die; cold; and seamless rolled ring forging. Mercer uses impression
die, open die and cold forging, but not seamless rolled ring forging. Impression
die forging, commonly referred to as "closed die" forging, is the principal
process employed by Mercer, and involves bringing two or more dies containing
"impressions" of the part shape together under extreme pressure, causing the
forging stock to undergo plastic reformation. Because the metal flow is
restricted by die containers, this process can yield more complex shapes and
closer tolerances than the "open die" forging process. Impression die forging is
used to produce products such as military and off-highway track and drive train
parts; automotive and truck drive train and suspension parts; railroad engine,
coupling and suspension parts; military ordinance parts and other items where
close tolerances are required.
Open die forging, so called because the metal is not confined laterally by
impression dies during forging, progressively works the starting stock into the
desired shape, generally between flat faced dies. Open die forging allows
production of a broad range of shapes and sizes.
Similar in method to impression die forging, cold forging is a process in
which a chemically-lubricated bar slug is forced into a closed die under
extreme pressure. In this way, unheated metal flows into the desired shape. The
cold forging process is best used to manufacture smaller, cylindrical pats such
as shafts, spindles and small net gears.
Once a rough forging is produced, regardless of the forging process, it
must generally still be machined. This process, known as "finishing" or
"conversion", smooths the component's exterior and mating surfaces and adds any
required specification, such as groves, threads, bolt holes and brand name
markings. The finishing process can contribute significantly to the value of the
end product, in particular in certain custom situations where high value
specialized machining is required. Machining can be performed either in-house by
the forge, by a machine shop which performs this process exclusively or by the
end-user.
An internal staff of five engineers designs products to meet customer
specifications incorporating computer assisted design (CAD) work stations for
tooling design. Because its forged products are inherently less expensive and
stronger, Mercer has been successful in replacing certain cast parts previously
supplied by third party foundries. Management believes that Mercer is an
industry leader in forging techniques using microalloy steel which produces
parts which are lighter and stronger than those forged from conventional carbon
steel.
Customers
Mercer's in-house sales organization sells direct to end users and OEMs. A
key element of Mercer's sales strategy is its ability to develop strong customer
relationships through responsive engineering capability, dependable quality and
just-in-time performance. Mercer currently serves approximately 40 individual
customer accounts. Dana Corporation represents Mercer's largest customer and
accounted for approximately 49% of Mercer's fiscal year ended November 30, 1997
sales.
18
19
Raw Materials
The principal raw materials used in Mercer's products are carbon and
microalloy steel. Mercer purchases substantially all of its carbon steel from
four principal sources. Mercer typically maintains 30 to 60 days supply on hand.
Mercer buys approximately 40,000 tons of raw steel per year. While Mercer has
never suffered an interruption of materials supply, management believes that, in
the event of any disruption from any individual source, adequate alternative
sources of supply are available within the immediate vicinity although there can
be no assurance in this regard.
Competition
Mercer competes primarily in a highly fragmented industry which includes
several dozen other press forgers and hammer forge shops. Hammer shops cannot
typically match press forgers' high volume, single component manufacturing, or
close tolerance production. Competition in the forging industry has also
historically been determined both by product and geography, with a large number
of relatively small forgers across the country carving out their own product and
customer niches. In addition, most end users manufacture some forgings
themselves, often maintaining a critical minimum level of production in-house
and contracting out the balance. The primary basis of competition in the forging
industry is price, but engineering, quality and dependability are also
important, particularly with respect to building and maintaining customer
relationships. Some of Mercer's competitors have significantly greater resources
than Mercer. There can be no assurance that Mercer will be able to maintain or
improve its competitive position in the markets in which it competes.
Mercer is not aware of any significant offshore competition within its
current product categories. Due to the importance of customer relationships and
engineering capabilities, most foreign producers are unable to compete.
Manufacturing Facilities
Mercer is located in northwest Pennsylvania, about 60 miles north and west
of the Greater Pittsburgh airport. Mercer owns it principal forging facility,
which occupies a twenty-one acre site, and consists of a 130,000 square foot
manufacturing facility (which was partially rebuilt and expanded by 50,000
square feet in 1989) and an adjacent office complex. Mercer also leases an
18,000 square foot machine shop facility located in Sharon, Pennsylvania,
approximately ten miles from Mercer's headquarters.
Mercer's main plant is able to forge complex components in runs from 500 to
more than 10,000 units. Mercer manufactures approximately 500 individual
products (SKUs) of which approximately half run throughout the production year.
Heating capacity is 59,000 pounds per hour through eight induction heaters.
Mercer's existing equipment can handle forging weights from 3 to 100 pounds and
forging diameters ranging from 2 1/2 inches to 13 inches. Shear/saw production
can handle up to 6 inch diameter billets.
Mercer presently operates eight press lines consisting of one 4,000 ton,
two 3,000 ton, two 2,000 ton and three 1,300 ton press lines. This equipment
includes two new press lines including heating equipment, trim presses and
billet loaders. The plant uses four microalloy conveyors. Mercer is also
equipped with saws and shearers to cut billets from round and square steel bars.
Mercer maintains a fully equipped quality control facility, magniflux machine,
shot cleaning equipment, complete die welding facility and die repair machine
shop.
19
20
Employees
Mercer currently has 155 full time hourly employees, all of whom are
represented by a collective bargaining agreement with United Steel Workers of
America. One such contract runs through March 31, 1999. In addition, Mercer's
machining operation has a nine year contract with the United Steel Workers of
America which expires in 2004. Management believes labor relations are good.
Mercer also occasionally utilizes an outside temporary service in its packing
operation.
Environmental Matters
Mercer is subject to environmental, health and safety laws comparable to
those governing the Company. See "-The Company (other than the Recently
Acquired Subsidiaries)-Environmental Matters."
DEETER FOUNDRY, INC.
Overview
Since 1945, Deeter has been producing gray iron castings for the heavy
municipal market. Deeter's municipal casting product line includes manhole
frames and covers, storm sewer inlet frames, grates and curbs, trench grating
and tree grates. Deeter also produces a wide variety of special application
construction castings. These products are utilized in waste treatment plants,
airports, telephone and electrical construction projects. Deeter's centralized
location in Lincoln, Nebraska allows it to service the majority of its
geographical market area with overnight delivery. In addition, Deeter maintains
2 stockyards located in the midwest and western U.S.
Products, Customers and Markets
Deeter manufactures the same products, serves the same markets and sells to
the same customer and market base as Neenah's heavy municipal line. See"-The
Company (other than the Recently Acquired Subsidiaries)-Products, Customers and
Markets."
Raw Materials
The primary raw materials used by Deeter to manufacture iron castings are
steel scrap, pig iron, metallurgical coke and silica sand. While there are
multiple suppliers for each of these commodities, Deeter has sourcing
arrangements with its suppliers of each of these major raw materials, with the
exception of pig iron. Due to long standing relationships with each of its
suppliers, Deeter believes that it will continue to be able to secure raw
materials from its suppliers at competitive prices. The primary energy sources
for Deeter's operations, electricity and natural gas, are purchased through
utilities.
20
21
Although the prices of all raw materials used by Deeter vary, the fluctuations
in the price of steel scrap are the most significant to Deeter. Deeter builds to
stock based on forecast sales during any given period and generally does not
have any long term customer contracts. As a result, in periods of rapidly rising
or falling scrap prices, prices charged to customers will relatively quickly
reflect the current scrap price. Rapidly fluctuating scrap prices may have a
temporary adverse or positive effect on Deeter's results of operations.
Competition
Deeter operates in the same industry as the Company and therefore faces the
same competitive environment as the Company. See "-The Company (other than the
Recently Acquired Subsidiaries)-Competition."
Manufacturing Facilities
Deeter is located on an 18 acre site with 71,000 square feet of
manufacturing area. Deeter operates three green sand molding lines with a
current annual capacity of 20,000 net saleable tons. Deeter maintains stockyards
located in Denver, Colorado and their primary distribution yard is located on
site in Lincoln, Nebraska.
Employees
At September 30, 1998 Deeter had 97 full time hourly employees and 25
salaried employees. The workers are non-union and Deeter believes its relations
with its employees are good.
Environmental Matters
Deeter is subject to environmental, health and safety laws comparable to
those governing the Company. See "-Company (other than the Recently Acquired
Subsidiaries)-Environmental Matters."
On May 30, 1997, prior to the Company's acquisition of Deeter, Deeter
pleaded guilty to disposing of hazardous waste without a permit and agreed to
pay a fine of $500,000, perform (by its president, Douglas E. Deeter) 300 hours
of community service and provide certain information regarding its waste
handling and disposal practices. Management believes that Deeter has complied
and that the matter will result in no further liabilities.
21
22
Item 2. PROPERTIES
The Company and the Recently Acquired Subsidiaries maintain the following
locations. All of the facilities are owned, with the exception of Mercer's
machining facility, which is leased.
ENTITY LOCATION PURPOSE
Neenah Foundry Co Neenah, WI 2 manufacturing facilities
Office facility
Dalton Corporation Warsaw, IN Manufacturing facility
Office facility
Kendallville, IN Manufacturing facility
Ashland, OH Manufacturing facility
Stryker, OH Machining facility
Advanced Cast Products, Inc. Dublin, OH Office facility
Meadville, PA Manufacturing/office facility
South Easton, MA Manufacturing facility
Ironton, OH Manufacturing facility
Mercer Forge Corporation Mercer, PA Manufacturing facility
Office facility
Sharon, PA Machining facility
Deeter Foundry, Inc. Lincoln, NE Manufacturing/office facility
The principal equipment at the company's facilities consist of molding
machines, presses, machining equipment, welding, grinding and painting
equipment. The Company regards its plant and equipment as well-maintained and
adequate for its needs. In addition to the facilities above, the Company owns
seven and leases seven distribution and sales centers.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company and Recently Acquired Subsidiaries are involved in routine
litigation incidental to its business. Such litigation is not, in the opinion of
management, likely to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition
or results of operations of the Company, or the Recently Acquired Subsidiaries.
Item 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the
year ended September 30, 1998.
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
There is no public market for the common stock of the Company. There was
one holder of record of the Company's common stock as of September 30, 1998.
22
23
Item 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
The following table sets forth the selected historical consolidated
financial and other data of the Company for the four years ended March 31,1997,
the six months ended March 31, 1997, and the one month ended April 30, 1997 (the
"Predecessor Company"), which have been derived from the Company historical
consolidated financial statements before the Merger and the five months ended
September 30, 1997 and the year ended September 30, 1998, which have been
derived from the Company's historical consolidated financial statements
following the Merger. The information contained in the following table should
also be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations," and the Company's historical
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this
report.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Predecessor Company
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Fiscal Year Ended , March 31,
-----------------------------
1994 1995 1996 1997 Six Months One Month Five Months Fiscal Year
---- ---- ---- ---- Ended Ended Ended Ended
March April September September
31, 1997 30, 1997 30, 1997 (1) 30, 1998 (2)
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
STATEMENT OF
INCOME DATA:
Net sales $131,982 $160,621 $166,951 $165,426 $75,686 $17,276 $108,353 $303,414
Cost of sales 106,531 120,981 121,631 116,736 53,749 11,351 77,444 222,451
-------- -------- ------- -------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Gross profit 25,451 39,640 45,320 48,690 21,937 5,925 30,909 80,963
Selling, general
and administrative
expenses 13,614 16,673 16,983 17,547 8,247 1,752 8,652 23,230
Amortization expense -- -- -- -- -- -- 3,900 7,727
-------- -------- -------- -------- ------- ------- -------- --------
Operating income 11,837 22,967 28,337 31,143 13,690 4,173 18,357 50,006
Interest expense
(income), net 1,043 397 (481) (1,162) (726) (121) 9,991 27,203
Income before
income taxes
and extraordinary
item 10,794 22,570 28,818 32,305 14,416 4,294 8,366 22,803
Provision for income
taxes 4,213 8,866 11,676 12,467 4,701 1,615 4,000 10,922
-------- -------- -------- -------- ------- ------- -------- -------
Income before
extraordinary item 6,581 13,704 17,142 19,838 9,715 2,679 4,366 11,881
Extraordinary item -- -- -- -- -- -- 1,630 392
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Net income $ 6,581 $ 13,704 $ 17,142 $19,838 $ 9,715 $ 2,679 $ 2,736 $11,489
======= ======== ======== ======= ======= ======= ======== =======
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
23
24
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE SHEET
DATA (AT END
OF PERIOD):
Cash and cash
equivalents $ 118 $ 238 $ 10,126 $22,403 $22,403 $ 29,046 $ 20,346 $ 19,798
Working capital 14,419 15,239 28,113 43,707 43,707 34,052 40,849 78,186
Total assets 74,327 73,813 82,957 93,869 93,869 102,067 358,406 584,309
Total debt 13,325 887 241 134 134 129 218,413 371,871
Total
stockholders' 37,929 43,198 54,790 68,857 68,857 74,458 47,407 67,922
equity
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) These amounts have been restated from the prior year as the contribution of
the capital stock of ACP was accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling
of interests because the Company and ACP were under common control.
(2) The amounts include the results of Deeter subsequent to March 30, 1998, the
results of Mercer subsequent to April 3, 1998 and the results of Dalton
subsequent to September 8, 1998.
24
25
Item 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Certain matters discussed in this Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and other sections of this annual
report are "forward-looking statements" intended to qualify for the safe
harbors from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements can generally be identified as
such because the context of the statement will include words such as the
Company "believes," "anticipates," "expects" or words of similar import.
Similarly, statements that describe the Company's future plans, objectives or
goals are also forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are
subject to certain risks and uncertainties which are described in close
proximity to such statements and which may cause actual results to differ
materially from those currently anticipated. The forward-looking statements
made herein are made only as of the date of this report and the Company
undertakes no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to
reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
On April 30, 1997, pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Predecessor
Company was acquired by NFC Castings, Inc. On July 1, 1997, Neenah Foundry
Company, which was the principal operating subsidiary of Neenah Corporation,
merged with and into Neenah Corporation and the surviving company changed its
name to Neenah Foundry Company.
The following discussion and analysis of the Company's financial condition
and results of operations addresses the periods both before and after the
Merger. The Merger has had a significant impact on the Company's results of
operations and financial condition. The Merger resulted in the recording of
goodwill and identifiable intangible assets totaling $148.8 million. These
amounts are being amortized over their estimated useful lives, ranging from 5
months to 40 years. The Merger has also resulted in a significant increase in
the Company's interest expense as a result of an increased level of
indebtedness. As a result of the Merger, the financial data presented herein for
the Pro Forma Twelve Months Ended September 30, 1997 period represents the
combination of financial data for the Predecessor Company's seven month period
ended April 30, 1997 and the Company's five month period ended September 30,
1997 and does not include any financial data for the Recent Acquisitions,
excluding ACP. The Pro Forma Twelve Months Ended September 30, 1997 data was
prepared by adding together the respective amounts of each line item for such
seven month and five month periods. No purchase accounting or other pro forma
adjustments have been made. The following discussion compares the results of
operations of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1998
(including the results of operations from the date of acquisition of any
Recently Acquired Subsidiary, excluding ACP, that was acquired during such
period), to the combined historical results of the operations of the Company and
the Predecessor Company for the twelve months ended September 30, 1997.
The Recent Acquisitions have had a significant impact on the Company's
results of operations and financial condition. Each of the Recent Acquisitions
(other than the ACP acquisition) was accounted for using the purchase method of
accounting. These Recent Acquisitions resulted in the recording of goodwill and
identifiable intangible assets totaling $101.1 million. These amounts are being
amortized over their estimated useful lives, ranging from four months to 40
years. The Recent Acquisitions have also resulted in a significant increase in
the Company's interest expense as a result of a substantially increased level of
indebtedness incurred to finance the Recent Acquisitions. The contribution of
the capital stock of ACP was accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling of
interests because the Company and ACP were under common control. The financial
results for the period from inception, May 1, 1997 through September 30, 1997
have been restated to account for this transaction.
The Company changed its fiscal year end to September 30 from March 31
effective September 30, 1997.
25
26
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth for the periods shown certain statement of
income data expressed as a percentage of net sales:
Fiscal Year
Ended March 31, Pro Forma Twelve
--------------- Months Ended Fiscal Year Ended
1996 1997 September 30, 1997 September 30, 1998
---- ---- ------------------ -------------------
Net sales 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of sales 72.9 70.6 70.8 73.3
Gross profit 27.1 29.4 29.2 26.7
----- ----- ----- -----
Selling, general and
administrative expense 10.1 10.6 9.3 7.7
Amortization of intangible
assets -- -- 1.9 2.5
----- ----- ----- -----
Operating income 17.0% 18.8% 18.0% 16.5%
===== ===== ===== =====
COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 TO PRO FORMA TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
Net Sales. Net sales for the year ended September 30, 1998 were $303.4
million which was $102.1 million or 50.7% higher than the pro forma twelve
months ended September 30, 1997. The Recently Acquired Subsidiaries excluding
ACP accounted for an increase of $53.5 million in net sales. The inclusion of
ACP for twelve months in 1998 versus five months in 1997 accounted for an
increase of $33.7 million in net sales. Net sales of municipal castings
increased by $3.1 million or 4.2 % due primarily to a strong economy in the
upper Midwest and market share gains in strategic focus areas of the East and
Southwest. Net sales of industrial castings increased by $11.7 million or 11.8%
due to the overall strength of the heavy duty truck market coupled with high
demand in the agricultural business.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the year ended September 30, 1998 was $81.0
million, an increase of $22.2 million or 37.8%, as compared to the pro forma
twelve months ended September 30, 1997. Approximately $8.0 million of the
increase was from the inclusion of the operating results of the Recently
Acquired Subsidiaries excluding ACP after their acquisition. The inclusion of
ACP for twelve months in 1998 versus five months in 1997 accounted for an
increase of $6.4 million in gross profit. The remaining margin improvement was
due to the combined effect of spreading manufacturing overhead over a greater
volume and improved efficiency in plant operations. Gross profit as a percentage
of net sales decreased to 26.7% during the year ended September 30, 1998 from
29.2% for the pro forma twelve months ended September 30, 1997. The decline in
gross profit percentage is attributable to the mix of industrial products and
lack of seasoning from the Recently Acquired Subsidiaries excluding ACP.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 1998 were $23.2
million, an increase of $4.5 million or 24.1% over the $18.7 million for the pro
forma twelve months ended September 30, 1997. The increase in selling, general
and administrative expense was due to the inclusion of $2.7 million of expenses
from the Recently Acquired Subsidiaries, excluding ACP, after their acquisition.
The inclusion of ACP for twelve months in 1998 versus five months in 1997
accounted for an increase of $3.0 million in expenses. As a percentage of net
sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 9.3% for the
pro forma twelve months ended September 30, 1997 to 7.7% for the year ended
September 30, 1998. The percentage decrease was
26
27
due to expenses being spread over a larger volume base with the inclusion of the
Recently Acquired Subsidiaries' operating results, excluding ACP.
Amortization of intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets was
$7.7 million for the year ended September 30, 1998, an increase of $3.8 million,
or 97.4%, as compared to the $3.9 million for the pro forma twelve months ended
September 30, 1997. The increase is due to the recording of twelve months of
amortization during the period ended September 30, 1998 for the goodwill and
identifiable intangible assets arising from the Merger versus five months of
amortization during the period ended September 30, 1997 as well as increased
amortization from goodwill and identifiable intangible assets from the Recently
Acquired Subsidiaries, excluding ACP.
Operating Income. Operating income was $50.0 million for the year ended
September 30, 1998, an increase of $13.8 million or 38.1% from the pro forma
twelve months ended September 30, 1997. The improvement in operating income was
achieved for the reasons discussed above under gross profit. As a percentage of
net sales, operating income decreased from 18.0% for the pro forma twelve months
ended September 30, 1997 to 16.5% for the year ended September 30, 1998. The
decrease in operating income percentage was due to the factors discussed above
under gross profit, as well as increased amortization of intangible assets.
Net Interest Expense. Net interest expense increased from $9.1 million for
the pro forma twelve months ended September 30, 1997 to $27.2 million for the
year ended September 30, 1998. The increased interest expense resulted from the
Company's Senior Subordinated Notes being outstanding for twelve months during
the year ended September 30, 1998 and only five months during the period ended
September 30, 1997 and the interest on the drawings under the Company's Senior
Bank Facilities to finance the Recent Acquisitions.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes for the year
ended September 30, 1998 is higher than the amount computed by applying the
statutory rate of approximately 40% to income before income taxes mainly due to
the amortization of goodwill which is not deductible for income tax purposes.
Extraordinary Item. During the year ended September 30, 1998, the Company
recorded an extraordinary loss of $0.4 million (which is net of an income tax
benefit of $0.3 million) for the write-off of unamortized deferred financing
costs in connection with the repayment in full of indebtedness of ACP prior to
its scheduled maturity. For the pro forma twelve months ended September 30,
1997, the Company recorded an extraordinary loss of $1.6 million (which is net
of an income tax benefit of $1.0 million) for the write-off of unamortized
deferred financing costs in connection with the repayment in full of the term
indebtedness under the Company's Senior Bank Facilities.
COMPARISON OF FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 TO FISCAL YEAR ENDED
MARCH 31, 1996
Net Sales. Net sales were $165.4 million for the year ended March 31, 1997, a
decrease of $1.6 million, or 0.9%, from $167.0 million for the year ended March
31, 1996. Net sales of industrial castings decreased $3.9 million, or 4.2%, to
$88.3 million. The decrease in industrial casting sales was primarily the result
of a decision by the Company to discontinue its production of certain lower
margin brake components which resulted in a 9,600 ton decrease in tons produced
compared to the year earlier period, and, to a lesser extent, reduced demand for
casting products in the medium- and heavy-duty truck market. Net sales of
municipal castings increased $1.9 million, or 2.7%, to $71.3 million, primarily
due to increased pricing. Hartley Controls net sales grew $0.4 million, or 7.4%,
to $5.8 million, principally due to increased volume of equipment sales.
Gross Profit. Gross profit was $48.7 million for the year ended March 31,
1997, an increase of $3.4 million, or 7.5%, from $45.3 million for the year
ended March 31, 1996. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased to
29.4% for the year ended March 31, 1997, from 27.1% for the year ended March 31,
1996. The increase in gross profit as a percentage of net sales was due mainly
to improved product mix in
27
28
the industrial product line and greater overall plant efficiency. Gross profit
percentage also improved due to the continued effect of the lightweighted
municipal casting program.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and
administrative expenses were $17.5 million for the year ended March 31, 1997, an
increase of $0.5 million, or 2.9%, from $17.0 million for the year ended March
31, 1996. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative
expenses increased to 10.6% for the year ended March 31, 1997, from 10.1% for
the year ended March 31, 1996. Approximately $0.2 million of the increase in
selling, general and administrative expenses was due to a non-recurring
charitable contribution and approximately $0.9 million of the increase was due
to increased compensation and benefits to officers of the Company who resigned
at the time of the Merger. Excluding the effects of estimated nonrecurring
officer compensation and benefits and the charitable contribution, selling,
general and administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, decreased
slightly to 8.3% for the year ended March 31, 1997, from 8.4% for the year ended
March 31, 1996.
Operating Income. Operating income increased to $31.1 million for the year
ended March 31, 1997, an increase of $2.8 million or 9.9% from $28.3 million for
the year ended March 31, 1996. As a percentage of net sales, operating income
increased to 18.8% for the year ended March 31, 1997, from 17.0% for the year
ended March 31, 1996. The improvement in operating income was achieved primarily
for the reasons discussed above.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
In connection with the Merger, the Company issued $150.0 million principal
amount of 11-1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 (the Senior Subordinated
Notes) and entered into a credit agreement providing for term loans of $45.0
million and a revolving credit facility of up to $30.0 million (the "Senior Bank
Facilities.) On July 1, 1997, the Company issued an additional $45.0 million
principal amount of 11-1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes and used the proceeds of
$47.6 million to pay the term loans under the Senior Bank Facility, the accrued
interest thereon and related fees and expenses. In addition, on September 12,
1997, the Company amended the revolving credit facility under the Senior Bank
Facility to increase the borrowings available under the revolving credit
facility from $30.0 million to $50.0 million and eliminate all borrowing base
limitations. On April 3, 1998, in connection with the acquisition of Mercer, the
Company, ACP Holdings and the lenders party thereto amended the Credit Agreement
to provide availability of $75.0 million of term loans to the Company
(consisting of $20.0 million of Tranche A Loans and $55.0 million of Tranche B
Loans) in addition to the Company's existing $50.0 million Revolving Credit
Facility. On September 8, 1998, in connection with the acquisition of Dalton and
the contribution of the capital stock of ACP, the Company, ACP Holdings and the
lenders party thereto amended and restated the Credit Agreement to provide for
additional Tranche B Loans in an aggregate principal amount of $70.0 million and
an Acquisition Loan Facility in aggregate principal amount outstanding at any
one time not to exceed $50.0 million. On November 24, 1998, the Company sold $87
million principal amount of 11 1/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 and used
$29 million of the proceeds to paydown borrowings under the Acquisition Loan
Facility. The remaining proceeds are to be used for general corporate purposes.
The Company's liquidity needs will arise primarily from debt service on the
above indebtedness, working capital needs, the funding of capital expenditures
and additional acquisitions. Borrowings under the the Senior Bank Facilities
bear interest at variable interest rates. The Senior Bank Facility imposes
restrictions on the Company's ability to make capital expenditures and both the
Senior Bank Facility and the indentures governing the Senior Subordinated Notes
limit the Company's ability to incur additional indebtedness. The covenants
contained in the Senior Bank Facility also, among other things, restrict the
ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to dispose of assets, incur
guarantee obligations, prepay the Senior Subordinated Notes or amend its
indentures, pay dividends, create liens on assets, enter into sale and leaseback
transactions, make investments, loans or advances, make acquisitions, engage in
mergers or consolidations, change the business conducted by the Company, make
capital expenditures or engage in certain transactions with affiliates, and
otherwise restrict corporate activities.
28
29
For the fiscal years ended March 31, 1996 and 1997, the pro forma twelve
months ended September 30, 1997 and the year ended September 30, 1998, capital
expenditures were $7.3 million, $4.5 million, $5.1 million and $13.1 million,
respectively. The capital expenditures for the year ended September 30, 1998
were primarily the result of planned enhancements to certain equipment in the
manufacturing area and include expenditures of the Recently Acquired
Subsidiaries, excluding ACP, since their acquisition date.
The Company's principal source of cash to fund its liquidity needs will be
net cash from operating activities and borrowings under its Senior Bank
Facilities. Net cash from operating activities for the year ended September 30,
1998 was $24.2 million. Net cash from operating activities for the pro forma
twelve months ended September 30, 1997 was $37.4 million. The decrease resulted
from lower net income and a paydown of accounts payable and accrued liabilities
during the year ended September 30, 1998. Net cash from operating activities for
the year ended March 31, 1997 was $23.5 million, an increase of $1.2 million
from $22.3 million for the year ended March 31, 1996, primarily as a result of
an increase in net income.
The Company believes that cash generated from operations and existing
revolving lines of credit under the Senior Bank Facilities will be sufficient to
meet its normal operating requirements, including working capital needs and
interest payments on the Company's outstanding indebtedness.
Amounts under the $50.0 million Revolving Credit Facility may be used for
working capital and general corporate purposes, subject to certain limitations
under the Senior Bank Facilities. Amounts under the Acquisition Loan Facility
may be used to make acquisitions permitted under the Senior Bank Facilities. The
Company believes that such resources, together with the potential future use of
debt or equity financing, will allow the Company to pursue its strategic goal of
making selective acquisitions.
RAW MATERIALS
Although the prices of all raw materials used by the Company vary, the
fluctuations in the price of steel scrap are the most significant to the
Company. The Company has arrangements with most of its industrial customers
which require the Company to adjust industrial casting prices to reflect scrap
price fluctuations. In periods of rapidly rising or falling scrap prices, these
adjustments will lag the current scrap price because they are generally based on
average market prices for prior periods, which periods vary by customer but are
generally no longer than six months. Castings are generally sold to the heavy
municipal market on a bid basis and, after a bid is won, the price for the
municipal casting subject to the bid generally cannot be adjusted for raw
material price increases. However, in most cases the Company has been successful
in obtaining higher municipal casting unit prices in subsequent bids to
compensate for rises in scrap prices in prior periods. Rapidly fluctuating scrap
prices may have a temporary adverse or positive effect on the Company's results
of operations.
INFLATION
The Company does not believe that inflation has had a material impact on
its financial position or results of operations during the past three years.
CYCLICALITY AND SEASONALITY
The Company has historically experienced moderate cyclicality in the heavy
municipal market. Sales of municipal products are influenced by, among other
things, public spending. In the industrial market, the Company has experienced
cyclicality in sales resulting from fluctuations in the medium- and heavy-duty
truck market and the farm equipment market, which are subject to general
economic trends.
The Company experiences seasonality in its municipal business where sales
tend to be higher during the construction season, which occurs during the warmer
months, generally the third and fourth quarters of the Company's fiscal year.
The Company maintains level production throughout the year in anticipation of
such seasonality and does not experience production volume fluctuations as a
result. The Company builds inventory in anticipation of the construction season
with such inventories reaching a peak near the end of
29
30
its second quarter in March. The Company has not historically experienced
seasonality in industrial casting sales.
YEAR 2000
The Company and its subsidiaries have conducted an evaluation of the
actions necessary in order to ensure that its computer systems will be able to
function without disruption with respect to the application of dating systems in
the Year 2000. As a result of this evaluation, each company within the
consolidated entity is engaged in the process of upgrading, replacing and
testing certain of its information and other computer systems in order to
operate without disruption due to Year 2000 issues. The Company's remedial
actions are scheduled to be completed during the first quarter of 1999 and those
of its subsidiaries are anticipated to be completed prior to the third quarter
of 1999. The Company does not anticipate that the costs of its remedial actions
will be material to its results of operations and financial position and are
being expensed as incurred.
Although there can be no assurance that the remedial actions being
implemented by the Company will address every issue relating to the Year 2000
issue, the Company believes it is unlikely that any disruptions resulting from
the Year 2000 issue would have a significant impact on its overall operations.
In addition to its investigations of its own systems, the Company has begun
assessing the Year 2000 readiness of its important vendors and customers.
Management believes that all its important critical vendors and customers either
have or will have addressed any problems associated with the Year 2000 issue
such that there will be no significant deterioration in future business dealings
due to this issue.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates.
The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or
trading purposes.
Interest Rate Sensitivity. The Company's earnings are affected by changes
in short-term interest rates as a result of its borrowings under the Senior Bank
Facilities. If market interest rates for such borrowings average 1% more during
the fiscal year ended September 30, 1999 than they did during fiscal 1998, the
Company's interest expense would increase, and income before income taxes would
decrease by approximately $1.7 million. This analysis does not consider the
effects of the reduced level of overall economic activity that could exist in
such an environment. Further, in the event of a change of such magnitude,
management could take actions to further mitigate its exposure to the change.
However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and
their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in the
Company's financial structure.
Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements and schedules are listed in Part IV Item 14 of
this Form 10-K.
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None.
30
31
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following sets forth certain information as of September 30, 1998, with
respect to the persons who are members of the Board of Directors, key executive
officers and certain other key employees of the Company.
Name Age Position
---- --- --------
James K. Hildebrand 62 Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
William M. Barrett 52 Vice President and General Manger
Gary W. LaChey 53 Vice President - Finance, Treasurer and Secretary
Charles M. Kurtti 61 Vice President - Manufacturing and Engineering
William J. Martin 51 Vice President and General Manager - Hartley
Controls Corporation
John Z. Rader 50 Vice President - Human Resources
Timothy J. Koller 49 Vice President - Construction Products, Sales, and Engineering
Frank C. Headington 49 Director - Product Reliability
Brenton F. Halsey 69 Director
David F. Thomas 48 Director
John D. Weber 34 Director
Mr. Hildebrand is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, a position he has held since May 1, 1997. Mr. Hildebrand has been
President and Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Cast Products, Inc. since
1988, and will continue in that position for the foreseeable future. Previously,
he served as President of the Cast Products Group of Amcast Industrial Corp. Mr.
Hildebrand is also employed by ACP Holding Company which, beneficially owns all
the common equity of both the Company and Advanced Cast Products, Inc. Mr.
Hildebrand devotes substantial time to, and is partially compensated by,
Advanced Cast Products, Inc.
Mr. Barrett is Vice President and General Manager of the Company, a
position he has held since May 1, 1997. Mr. Barrett joined the Company in 1992
serving as General Sales Manager - Industrial Castings. From 1985 to 1992, Mr.
Barrett was the Vice President - Sales for Harvard Industries Cast Products
Group.
Mr. LaChey is Vice President - Finance, Treasurer and Secretary of the
Company, a position he has held since May 1, 1997. Mr. LaChey joined the Company
in 1971, serving in a variety of positions of increasing responsibility in the
finance department. Mr. LaChey was most recently Vice President - Administration
of the Company.
Mr. Kurtti is Vice President - Manufacturing and Engineering, of the
Company, a position he has held since 1991. Mr. Kurtti joined the Company in
1976 as a salesman. Mr. Kurtti has served as Director of Marketing, Director of
Purchasing - Engineering and Director - Manufacturing and Engineering.
Mr. Martin is Vice President and General Manger - Hartley Controls
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, a position he has held
since 1996. Previously, Mr. Martin was Territory Sales Manager at Disamatic,
Inc., a molding machine manufacturer, from 1986 to 1996.
Mr. Rader is Vice President - Human Resources, a position he has held since
1990. Mr. Rader joined the Company in 1987, serving as Director - Personnel
until 1989 and as Director - Human Resources until 1990.
31
32
Mr. Koller is Vice President - Construction Products, Sales and Engineering
for the Company. Mr. Koller joined the Company in 1978, serving in a variety of
positions of increasing responsibility in the sales and marketing departments.
Mr. Headington is Director - Product Reliability, a position he has held
since 1991. Mr. Headington joined the Company in 1989, as Manager - Technical
Services, a position he held until 1991.
Mr. Halsey is a director of the Company, a position he has held since May
1, 1997. Mr. Halsey was the founding Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
James River Corporation from 1969 to 1990. He continued as Chairman until 1992
when he became Chairman Emeritus.
Mr. Thomas is a director of the Company, a position he has held since May
1, 1997. Mr. Thomas has been a Managing Director of Citicorp Venture Capital,
Ltd. for more than the past five years. Mr. Thomas is a director of Lifestyles
Furnishings International Ltd., Galey & Lord, Inc., Anvil Knitwear, Inc. and a
number of private companies.
Mr. Weber is a director of the Company, a position he has held since May 1,
1997. Since 1994, Mr. Weber has been a Vice President at Citicorp Venture
Capital, Ltd. Previously, Mr. Weber worked at Putnam Investments from 1992
through 1994. Mr. Weber is a director of Anvil Knitwear, Inc. and a number of
private companies.
Directors of the Company who are officers or employees of the Company or
its affiliates are presently not expected to receive compensation for their
services as directors. No determination has yet been made with respect to
compensation for directors of the Company who are not officers or employees of
the Company or any of its affiliates. Directors of the Company will be entitled
to reimbursement of their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection with
their travel to and attendance at meetings of the board of directors or
committees thereof.
32
33
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
The compensation of executive officers of the Company will be determined by
the Board of Directors of the Company. None of the historical benefit or
compensation plans of the Company are described herein because each were
terminated with respect to the named officers and replaced as a group by a
single compensation plan in connection with the Merger (with the exception of a
401(k) plan and a retirement plan for Mr. Kurtti). The following table sets
forth information concerning compensation received by the five most highly
compensated officers of the Company for services rendered in the fiscal year
ended September 30, 1998, the five month period ended September 30, 1997 ("FM
1997"), the one month period ended April 30, 1997 ("OM 1997") and the fiscal
year ended March 31, 1997.
Long-Term Compensation
----------------------
Annual Compensation
Name and Principal Fiscal ------------------- Other Annual Optional LTIP All other
Position Year Salary Bonus Compensation(1) SARs(#) Payouts Compensation
-------- ---- ------ ----- --------------- ------- ------- ------------
James K. Hildebrand 1998 $ 120,000 $84,000 $34,107 -- -- --
Chairman and Chief FM 1997 50,000 -- 10,860
Executive Officer OM 1997 -- -- --
1997 -- -- --
William M. Barrett 1998 148,500 85,575 31.490 -- -- --
Vice President and FM 1997 55,000 -- 11,430
General Manager OM 1997 8,225 -- 1,936
1997 98,700 20,000 26,030
Gary W. LaChey 1998 145,345 86,980 31,469 -- -- --
Vice President - FM 1997 59,175 -- 10,723
Finance, Secretary OM 1997 11,833 -- 2,081
and Treasurer 1997 137,998 40,000 26,984
Charles M. Kurtti 1998 137,500 80,850 34,510 -- -- --
Vice President - FM 1997 55,000 -- 11,430
Manufacturing and OM 1997 11,000 -- 2,229
Engineering 1997 127,750 45,000 32,230
John Z. Rader 1998 137,000 80,850 31,303 -- -- --
Vice President - FM 1997 55,000 -- 11,430
Human Resources OM 1997 11,000 -- 2,229
1997 127,750 40,000 29,725
(1) The named officers have participated in the Company's profit sharing,
Company 401(k) contributions, and excess benefit programs. The aggregate
payments made by the Company pursuant to such programs are listed as Other
Annual Compensation.
MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN
The Company provides performance-based compensation awards to executive
officers and key employees for achievement during each year as part of a bonus
plan. Such compensation awards may be a function of individual performance and
consolidated corporate results. The qualitative and quantitative criteria will
be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors of the Company.
33
34
MANAGEMENT EQUITY PARTICIPATION
In connection with the Merger, the then current Management Investors
acquired units representing membership interests in ACP Products, L.L.C., which
represent, in the aggregate, approximately a ten percent beneficial interest in
the Company (the "Purchased Interests"). In addition, in connection with certain
of the Recent Acquisitions, certain senior managers of certain of the Recently
Acquired Subsidiaries purchased common interests in ACP Products, L.L.C. The
Management Investors and certain other employees of the Company may be given the
opportunity to purchase additional Purchased Interests either in connection with
future acquisitions or otherwise.
Upon the termination of employment with the Company, an employee's
Purchased Interests will be subject to certain repurchase provisions exercisable
by ACP Products, L.L.C. or its designees. Any Purchased Interests issued in the
future are expected to be subject to rights and restrictions similar to those of
the Purchased Interests purchased in connection with the Merger. The price of
the future Purchased Interests will be established by ACP Products, L.L.C. in
consultation with the Board of Directors of the Company or a compensation
committee thereof.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The Company's authorized capital stock consists of 11,000 shares of common
stock, par value $100 per share (the "Common Stock"), 1,000 shares of which are
issued and outstanding and owned by NFC Castings, Inc. and are pledged to the
lenders under the Senior Bank Facilities. NFC Castings, Inc. is a wholly owned
subsidiary of ACP Holdings which in turn is wholly owned by ACP Products, L.L.C.
The outstanding common units of ACP Products, L.L.C. consist of 95,000
Class A-3 Common Units (the "Class A Common Units"), 936,735 Class B-3 Common
Units (the "Class B Common Units") and 103,500 Class C-3 Common Units (the
"Class C Common Units"), and together with the Class A "Common Units" and the
Class B Common Units, the "Common Units"). Holders of Class A Common Units are
entitled to one vote per Class A Common Unit on all matters to be voted upon by
the holders of Class A Common Units. Holders of Class C Common Units are
entitled to a number of votes per Class C Common Unit based on the total number
of Class C Common Units outstanding, on all matters to be voted upon by the
holders of Class C Common Units. Holders of Class B Common Units have no right
to vote on any matters to be voted on by holders of Common Units. Holders of
Class B Common Units may elect at any time to convert any or all of such Units
into Class A Common Units, on a Common Unit-for-Common-Unit basis.
34
35
Set forth below is certain information regarding the beneficial
ownership as of September 30, 1998 of Class A Common Units and Class C Common
Units, respectively, by each person who beneficially owns 5.0% or more of the
outstanding Class A Common Units or Class C Common Units each director and Named
Executive Officer and all directors and Named Executive Officers as a group.
Except as indicated below, the address for each of the persons listed below is
c/o Neenah Foundry Company, 2121 Brooks Avenue, Box 729, Neenah, Wisconsin
54957.
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Number of Percentage Percentage of Percentage of
Voting Class A Voting Class of Voting Voting Class Voting
NAME AND ADDRESS OF BENEFICIAL OWNER Common Units C Common Class A C Common Units Common Units
- ------------------------------------ Units Common
Units
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Citicorp Venture Capital, Ltd. (1) (2) 81,000 -- 85.26% -- 40.81%
399 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10043
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company 5,000 -- 5.26% -- 2.52%
One Madison Avenue
New York, New York 10010
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James K. Hildebrand (1) -- 20,000 -- 19.32% 10.08%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William M. Barrett (1) -- 13,000 -- 12.56% 6.55%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary W. LaChey (1) -- 13,000 -- 12.56% 6.55%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles W. Kurtti (1) -- 13,000 -- 12.56% 6.55%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
William J. Martin (1) -- 13,000 -- 12.56% 6.55%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Z. Rader (1) -- 13,000 -- 12.56% 6.55%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Clark (1) -- 8,000 -- 7.73% 4.03%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
David F Thomas (1) (3) 84,167 -- 88.60% -- 42.40%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John D. Weber (1) (3) 81,169 -- 85.44% -- 40.89%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Directors and named executive officers as a group 89,336 93,000 94.04% 89.05% 91.86%
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) Such person disclaims beneficial ownership of the Common Stock.
(2) Citicorp Venture Capital, Ltd. and its affiliates (collectively,
"CVC") own 766,794 Class B Common Units representing 81.86% of
the Class B Common Units outstanding.
(3) Consists of the Class A Common Units held directly by Messrs.
Thomas and Weber and those held by CVC, which may be deemed to be
beneficially owned by Messrs. Thomas and Weber. Messrs. Thomas
and Weber disclaim beneficial ownership of Units held by CVC.
Mr. Thomas is a managing director of CVC. Mr. Weber is a vice
president of CVC.
35
36
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
RELATIONSHIP WITH ACP HOLDINGS
ACP Products, L.L.C. holds all of the issued and outstanding shares of
capital stock of ACP Holdings. ACP Holdings is the parent company of NFC
Castings, Inc., and thus ACP Holdings indirectly owns 100% of the Common Stock
of the Company. James K. Hildebrand, who serves as the Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, currently serves as President and Chief
Executive Officer of ACP Holdings. Mr. Hildebrand held such positions prior to
the contribution of the capital stock of ACP to the Company and received payment
for such services.
SHAREHOLDER RELATIONSHIPS
The Management Investors and certain institutional investors, including
Citicorp Venture Capital, Ltd., are parties to the Fifth Amended and Restated
Limited Liability Agreement of ACP Products, L.L.C. (the "L.L.C. Agreement").
The L.L.C. Agreement contains certain provisions with respect to the beneficial
equity interests and corporate governance of the Company. The L.L.C. Agreement
provides that the Investor Group and the Management Investors, as the only
members of ACP Products, L.L.C. holding beneficial interests in the Company,
have the right to direct all actions taken in respect of NFC Castings, Inc. and
the Company, including, without limitation, appointing members of the Board of
Directors of the Company and of NFC Castings, Inc..
CONTRIBUTION OF ACP CAPITAL STOCK
On September 8, 1998, the capital stock of ACP was contributed to the
Company by ACP Holdings. In connection with the contribution, the Company
assumed $14.9 million of indebtedness of ACP, $14.6 of which was refinanced
through borrowings of Tranche A Loans. In connection with the contribution of
the capital stock of ACP to the Company, (i) NFC Castings, Inc. issued a $4.2
million senior subordinated note to CVC in exchange for a $4.2 million current
pay obligation of ACP to CVC and (ii) $6.7 million of outstanding subordinated
debt of ACP to ACP Holdings and NFC Castings, Inc. was contributed to the
capital of ACP.
REGISTRATION RIGHTS AGREEMENT
The Company entered into a registration rights agreement (the "Registration
Rights Agreement") with the Investor Group and the Management Investors.
Pursuant to the terms of the Registration Rights Agreement, certain holders of
the Company's Common Stock have the right to require the Company, at the
Company's sole cost and expense and subject to certain limitations, to register
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or list on any recognized stock
exchange all or part of the Common Stock beneficially owned by such holders (the
"Registrable Securities"). All such holders will be entitled to participate in
all registrations by the Company or other holders, subject to certain
limitations. In connection with all such registrations, the Company agreed to
indemnify all beneficial owners of Registrable Securities against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
and other applicable state or foreign securities laws. Registrations pursuant to
the Registration Rights Agreement will be made, if applicable, on the
appropriate registration form and may be underwritten registrations.
EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS
Prior to the Merger, the Predecessor Company entered into a consulting
agreement with James P. Keating, Jr. a former Senior Vice President of the
Company, that provides that Mr. Keating will be available to serve as a
consultant to the Company from July 1, 1997 to June 30, 1999. Mr. Keating is
paid $16,500 per month under such consulting agreement. The Company, ACP, ACP
Holdings and ACP Products, L.L.C. entered into an executive employment and
consulting agreement with James K. Hildebrand dated as of September 15, 1998.
Such agreement provides
36
37
for (I) an initial term of employment until September 30, 2001 after which,
barring termination by the Company under certain circumstances (including gross
negligence, willful misconduct and commission of certain crimes), Mr. Hildebrand
will serve as a consultant to the Company for a period of two years with
automatic renewal, subject to earlier termination notice by either party, for
successive one year periods up to an additional three years; (ii) a minimum base
salary of $500,000 and a bonus to be calculated based on achieved EBITDA
performance so long as Mr. Hildebrand is employed by the Company; (iii)
severance benefits; (iv) non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality
agreements; (v) an option to purchase certain common membership units of ACP
Products L.L.C.; and (vi) other terms and conditions of Mr. Hildebrand's
employment including health benefits. In addition, in connection with the
Company's acquisition of all of the capital stock of Dalton, Dalton entered into
an employment agreement with K.L. Davidson dated as of September 8, 1998 to
serve as President of Dalton. Such agreement provides for (I) an initial one
year term which shall be renewed automatically, subject to earlier termination
notice by either party, for successive one year terms until Mr. Davidson attains
the age of 65; (ii) a minimum base salary and bonus following the end of each
fiscal year so long as Dalton employs Mr. Davidson; (iii) severance benefits;
(iv) non-solicitation, non-compete and confidentiality agreements; and (v) other
terms and conditions of Mr. Davidson's employment.
37
38
Part IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON
FORM 8-K.
(a) (1) Consolidated Financial Statements of Neenah Foundry Company Page
----
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors 45
Consolidated Balance Sheets 46
Consolidated Statements of Income 48
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder's Equity 49
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 50
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 51
Consolidated Financial Statements of Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors 70
Consolidated Balance Sheets 71
Consolidated Statements of Income 73
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder's Equity 74
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 75
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 76
(2) Financial Statements Schedules
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors 88
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts of Neenah Foundry Company 89
(Predecessor)
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors 90
Schedule II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts of Neenah Foundry Company 91
The following schedules are omitted as not applicable or not required under the
rules of regulation S-X: I, III, IV, and V.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K.
The Company filed one report on Form 8-K during the quarter ended
September 30, 1998. The report, dated September 21, 1998, disclosed
that the Company had acquired Dalton Corporation and Advanced Cast
Products, Inc.
(c) Exhibits
See Exhibit Index.
38
39
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized in the City of Neenah,
State of Wisconsin, on December 22, 1998.
NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY
(Registrant)
/s/Gary W. LaChey
----------------------------
Gary W. LaChey
Vice President - Finance, Secretary
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Principal
Accounting Officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report
has been signed below on December 28, 1998, by the following persons on behalf
of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.
/s/James K. Hildebrand /s/ Brenton F. Halsey
------------------------------- ------------------------------------
James K. Hildebrand Brenton F. Halsey
Chairman of the Board and Director
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ David F. Thomas /s/ Gary W. LaChey
------------------------------- ------------------------------------
David F. Thomas Gary W. LaChey
Director Vice President - Finance, Secretary
and Treasurer
(Principal Financial and Principal
Accounting Officer)
/s/ John D. Weber
-------------------------------
John D. Weber
Director
39
40
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBITS
- --------
2.1 Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated November 20, 1996, by and
among NFC Castings, Inc., NC Merger Company and Neenah Corporation. **
2.2 First Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of
January 13, 1997, by and among NFC Castings, Inc., NC Merger Company and
Neenah Corporation. **
2.3 Second Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of
February 21, 1997, by and among NFC Castings, Inc., NC Merger Company
and Neenah Corporation. **
2.4 Third Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of
April 3, 1997, by and among NFC Castings, Inc., NC Merger Company and
Neenah Corporation. **
2.5 Merger Agreement, made as of July 1,1997, by and between Neenah
Corporation and Neenah Foundry Company. **
2.6 Stock Purchase Agreement for the acquisition of Deeter Foundry, Inc.
dated as of March 26, 1998 by and among Neenah Foundry Company and the
Selling Shareholders of Deeter Foundry, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to the Company's Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 1998 filed on
May 14, 1998.)
2.7 Stock Purchase Agreement for the acquisition of Mercer dated as of April
3, 1998 by and among Neenah Foundry Company, Mercer Forge Corporation
and the Selling Shareholders of Mercer (incorporated by reference to the
Company's Form 8-K filed on April 14, 1998.)
2.8 Stock Purchase Agreement for the acquisition of Dalton dated as of
August 7, 1998 by and among Neenah Foundry Company, Dalton Corporation
and the Dalton Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust
(incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed on September
21, 1998.)
3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation of Neenah Foundry Company. **
3.2 By-laws of Neenah Foundry Company. **
3.3 (Intentionally omitted.)
3.4 (Intentionally omitted.)
3.5 Restated Articles of Incorporation of Hartley Controls Corporation. **
3.6 By-laws of Hartley Controls Corporation. **
3.7 Restated Articles of Incorporation of Neenah Transport, Inc.**
3.8 By-laws of Neenah Transport, Inc. **
4.1 Indenture dated as of April 30, 1997 among NC Merger Company and United
States Trust Company of New York. **
4.2 Purchase Agreement dated as of April 23, 1997 among NC Merger Company,
Chase Securities Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated. **
4.3 Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement dated as of April 30, 1997
among Neenah Corporation, Neenah Foundry Company, Hartley Controls
Corporation and Neenah Transport, Inc. and Chase Securities, Inc.**
4.4 First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 30, 1997 among Neenah
Corporation, Neenah Foundry Company, Neenah Transport, Inc. and Hartley
Controls Corporation and United States Trust Company of New York. **
4.5 Letter Agreement, dated as of April 30, 1997 among Neenah Corporation,
Neenah Foundry Company, Hartley Controls Corporation and Neenah
Transport, Inc. and Chase Securities Inc. and Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated. **
4.6 Form of Global Note relating to the Indenture dated as of April 23,
1997. **
4.7 Indenture dated as of July 1, 1997 among Neenah Corporation, Neenah
Foundry Company, Neenah Transport, Inc., Hartley Controls Corporation
and United States Trust Company of New York. **
4.8 Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 1997 among Neenah Corporation,
Neenah Foundry Company, Hartley Controls Corporation, Neenah Transport,
Inc. and Chase Securities Inc. **
40
41
4.9 Exchange and Registration Rights Agreement dated as of July 1, 1997 by
and between Neenah Corporation, Neenah Foundry Company, Hartley Controls
Corporation, Neenah Transport, Inc. and Chase Securities, Inc. **
4.10 Form of Global Note related to the Indenture dated as of July 1, 1997.
**
10.1 Master Lease Agreement between Neenah Foundry Company and Bank One
Leasing Corporation dated December 14, 1992. **
10.2 Agreement between Neenah Foundry Company and Rockwell International
Corporation effective April 1, 1995. **
10.3 Letter Agreement between Neenah Foundry Company and Eaton Corporation
dated April 4, 1996.**
10.4 (Intentionally omitted).
10.5 1996-1998 Collective Bargaining Agreement between Neenah Foundry Company
and Local 121B Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics and Allied Workers
International Union AFL-CIO-CLC. **
10.6 1998-2000 Collective Bargaining Agreement between Neenah Foundry Company
and The Independent Patternmakers Union of Neenah, Wisconsin. *
10.7 Credit Agreement dated as of April 30, 1997 as Amended and Restated as
of September 12, 1997, as of April 3, 1998, and as of September 8, 1998
by and among Neenah Foundry Company, NFC Castings, Inc., the Chase
Manhattan Bank as Administrative Agent, Chase Securities, Inc. as
Arranger and the other Lenders from time to time party thereto
(incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 8-K filed on September
21, 1998.)
10.8 Employment Agreement dated September 9, 1994 between the Neenah
Corporation, Neenah Foundry Company, Harley Controls Corporation, Neenah
Transport, Inc. and James P. Keating, Jr.**
10.9 Consulting Agreement dated September 9, 1994 between the Neenah Foundry
Company and the Guarantors and James P. Keating, Jr. **
10.10 First Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated September 9, 1994,
between Neenah Foundry Company, Neenah Corporation, Hartley Controls
Corporation and James P. Keating, Jr. **
10.11 Pledge Agreement dated as of April 30, 1997, among NC Merger Company, a
Wisconsin Corporation, NFC Castings, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. **
10.12 Subsidiary Guarantee Agreement dated as of April 30, 1997, among each of
the subsidiaries listed of NC Merger Company, a Wisconsin corporation,
and The Chase Manhattan Bank, a New York banking corporation, as
collateral agent for the secured parties. **
10.13 Parent Guarantee Agreement dated as of April 30, 1997, between NFC
Castings, Inc., a Delaware corporation and The Chase Manhattan Bank, a
New York banking corporation, as collateral agent for the secured
parties. **
10.14 Security Agreement dated as of April 30, 1997, among NC Merger Company,
a Wisconsin corporation, each subsidiary of the borrower and The Chase
Manhattan Bank, a New York banking corporation, as collateral agent for
the secured parties. **
10.15 Form of Mortgage. **
10.16 Amendment No. 1, Consent and Waiver, dated as of November 18, 1998, to
the Credit Agreement dated as of April 30, 1997 as Amended and Restated
as of September 12, 1997, as of April 3, 1998, and as of September 8,
1998 by and among Neenah Foundry Company, NFC Castings, Inc., the
Lenders from time to time party thereto, and the Chase Manhattan Bank. *
10.17 Cash Collateral Account Agreement dated as of November 24, 1998, between
Neenah Foundry Company and the Chase Manhattan Bank. *
10.18 Executive Employment and Consulting Agreement dated September 15, 1998
by and among Neenah Foundry Co.,Advanced Cast Products, Inc., ACP
Holding Co., ACP Products, LLC and James K. Hildebrand.*
10.19 Dalton Corporation, K.L. Davidson Employment Agreement dated September
8, 1998. *
21.1 Subsidiaries of the Registrant. *
41
42
27.1 Financial Data Schedule. *
- ----------
* Filed herewith
** Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form S-4 (Registration No.
333-28751) which became effective August 29, 1997.
42
43
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY
For the twelve months ended
September 30, 1998 and for the
period from inception, May 1, 1997,
through September 30, 1997
43
44
Neenah Foundry Company
Consolidated Financial Statements
For the twelve months ended September 30, 1998
and for the period from inception, May 1, 1997,
through September 30, 1997
CONTENTS
Report of Independent Auditors.................................................
Consolidated Balance Sheets....................................................
Consolidated Statements of Income..............................................
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder's Equity.....................
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows..........................................
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.....................................
44
45
Report of Independent Auditors
Board of Directors
Neenah Foundry Company
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Neenah Foundry
Company (the Company) as of September 30, 1998 and 1997 and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholder's equity and cash
flows for the twelve months ended September 30, 1998 and for the period from
inception, May 1, 1997, through September 30, 1997. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the
Company as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for the twelve months ended September 30, 1998 and
for the period from inception, May 1, 1997, through September 30, 1997, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
November 6, 1998, except for Note 10,
as to which the date is November 24, 1998
45
46
Neenah Foundry Company
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
SEPTEMBER 30
1998 1997
---------------------------------
(Restated -
See Note 2)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 19,798 $ 20,346
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $853
in 1998 and $491 in 1997 71,655 36,907
Inventories 40,841 22,264
Income taxes refundable 375 --
Deferred income taxes 4,888 1,884
Other current assets 5,060 716
---------------------------------
Total current assets 142,617 82,117
Property, plant and equipment:
Land 4,724 2,141
Buildings and improvements 19,954 10,058
Machinery and equipment 147,554 83,906
Patterns 26,439 22,787
---------------------------------
198,671 118,892
Less accumulated depreciation 18,134 6,268
---------------------------------
180,537 112,624
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization of $1,105 in
1998 and $641 in 1997 8,818 7,672
Identifiable intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$6,153 in 1998 and $2,491 in 1997 61,086 28,480
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $6,268 in 1998 and $2,300
in 1997 184,181 123,333
Other assets 7,070 4,180
---------------------------------
261,155 163,665
---------------------------------
$584,309 $358,406
=================================
46
47
SEPTEMBER 30
1998 1997
---------------------------------
(Restated -
See Note 2)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 29,920 $ 14,852
Income taxes payable -- 4,805
Accrued wages and employee benefits 13,005 5,863
Accrued interest 9,847 8,454
Other accrued liabilities 7,474 4,622
Current portion of long-term debt 4,185 2,672
---------------------------------
Total current liabilities 64,431 41,268
Long-term debt 367,686 215,741
Postretirement benefit obligations 5,220 4,894
Deferred income taxes 68,069 46,924
Other liabilities 10,981 2,172
---------------------------------
Total liabilities 516,387 310,999
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
Stockholder's equity:
Preferred stock, par value $100 per share; authorized 3,000 shares;
no shares issued or outstanding -- --
Common stock, Class A (voting), par value $100 per share; authorized
1,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 1,000 shares
100 100
Common stock, Class B (nonvoting), par value $100 per share; authorized
10,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding
-- --
Capital in excess of par value 55,167 44,571
Retained earnings 14,225 2,736
Pension liability adjustment (1,570) --
---------------------------------
Total stockholder's equity 67,922 47,407
---------------------------------
$584,309 $358,406
=================================
See accompanying notes.
47
48
Neenah Foundry Company
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In Thousands)
YEAR FIVE MONTHS ENDED
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 1997
------------------------------------------
(Restated -
See Note 2)
Net sales $303,414 $108,353
Cost of sales 222,451 77,444
------------------------------------------
Gross profit 80,963 30,909
Selling, general and administrative expenses 23,230 8,652
Amortization expense 7,727 3,900
------------------------------------------
Operating income 50,006 18,357
Other income (expense):
Interest income 893 367
Interest expense (28,096) (10,358)
------------------------------------------
Income before income taxes and extraordinary item 22,803 8,366
Provision for income taxes 10,922 4,000
------------------------------------------
Income before extraordinary item 11,881 4,366
Extraordinary item, net of income tax benefit of $260 in 1998
and $999 in 1997 392 1,630
------------------------------------------
Net income $ 11,489 $ 2,736
==========================================
See accompanying notes.
48
49
Neenah Foundry Company
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder's Equity
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
Common Stock
----------------------------
Preferred Capital in Excess
Stock Class A Class B of Par Value
-------------- -------------- ------------- -------------------
Balance at May 1, 1997 (Restated - See Note 2) $ -- $100 $ -- $44,571
Net income -- -- -- --
-------------- -------------- ------------- -------------------
Balance at September 30, 1997 -- 100 -- 44,571
Additional capital contributions by the
stockholder -- -- -- 10,596
Net income -- -- -- --
Pension liability adjustment -- -- -- --
-------------- -------------- ------------- -------------------
Balance at September 30, 1998 $ -- $100 $ -- $55,167
============== ============== ============= ===================
Pension
Retained Liability
Earnings Adjustment Total
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance at May 1, 1997 (Restated - See Note 2) $ -- $ -- $44,671
Net income 2,736 -- 2,736
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance at September 30, 1997 2,736 -- 47,407
Additional capital contributions by the
stockholder -- -- 10,596
Net income 11,489 -- 11,489
Pension liability adjustment -- (1,570) (1,570)
-------------- -------------- --------------
Balance at September 30, 1998 $14,225 $(1,570) $67,922
============== ============== ==============
See accompanying notes.
49
50
Neenah Foundry Company
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In Thousands)
YEAR ENDED FIVE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 1997
-------------------------------------------
(Restated - See Note 2)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $ 11,489 $ 2,736
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Extraordinary item 652 2,629
Depreciation 11,927 3,799
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets and goodwill 7,727 3,900
Amortization of deferred financing costs and premium on notes 713 342
Deferred income taxes (2,437) (2,147)
Other 79 (10)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (3,926) (4,696)
Inventories 812 5,648
Other current assets (715) 152
Accounts payable (158) 1,403
Income taxes (5,050) 2,143
Accrued liabilities 4,198 9,099
Postretirement benefit obligations 341 141
Other liabilities (1,416) 21
-------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 24,236 25,160
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired (169,109) (12,530)
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (13,117) (3,081)
Proceeds from redemption of life insurance policy -- 866
Other 58 43
-------------------------------------------
Net cash used in investing activities (182,168) (14,702)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from long-term debt 175,987 47,588
Payments on long-term debt (15,753) (47,888)
Debt issuance costs (2,850) (1,356)
-------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by financing activities 157,384 (1,656)
-------------------------------------------
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (548) 8,802
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 20,346 11,544
===========================================
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 19,798 $ 20,346
===========================================
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Cash paid for:
Interest $ 25,994 $ 1,560
Income taxes 16,340 3,716
See accompanying notes.
50
51
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 1998
(In Thousands)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
On April 30, 1997, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization with NC
Merger Company and NFC Castings, Inc., Neenah Corporation (Predecessor Company)
was acquired by NFC Castings, Inc., a holding company and a wholly owned
subsidiary of ACP Holding Company, using (i) $45,000 of cash equity contributed
by NFC Castings, Inc., (ii) $45,000 of term loans, (iii) proceeds from the
issuance of $150,000 of unsecured Senior Subordinated Notes and (iv) cash of
Neenah Corporation. The purchase price was $261,713 including a closing date net
worth adjustment and direct costs of the acquisition. The acquisition has been
accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The purchase price has
been allocated on the basis of fair values of the underlying assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value
of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired has been
allocated to goodwill.
Prior to July 1, 1997, Neenah Foundry Company was one of three wholly owned
subsidiaries of Neenah Corporation, a holding company with no significant assets
or operations other than its holdings in the common stock of its subsidiaries.
On July 1, 1997, Neenah Foundry Company merged into Neenah Corporation and the
surviving company changed its name to Neenah Foundry Company (Neenah, and
together with its subsidiaries, the Company).
Neenah manufactures gray and ductile iron castings for sale to industrial and
municipal customers. Industrial castings are custom-engineered and are produced
for customers in several industries, including the medium and heavy-duty truck
components, farm equipment, heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning
industries. Municipal castings include manhole covers and frames, storm sewer
frames and grates, trench drain systems, tree grates and specialty castings for
a variety of applications and are sold principally to state and local government
entities, utility companies and contractors.
51
52
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Neenah has the following subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned: Neenah
Transport, Inc. (Transport); Hartley Controls Corporation (Hartley); Deeter
Foundry, Inc. (Deeter); Mercer Forge Corporation and subsidiaries (Mercer);
Dalton Corporation and subsidiaries (Dalton); and Advanced Cast Products, Inc.
(ACP). Transport is a common and contract carrier licensed to operate in the
continental United States. The majority of Transport's revenues are derived from
transport services provided to the Company. Hartley designs and manufactures
customized sand control systems for the foundry industry. Deeter manufactures
gray iron castings for the municipal market and special application construction
castings which are used in waste treatment plants, airports, telephone and
electrical construction projects. Mercer produces forged components for use in
transportation, railroad, mining and heavy industrial applications and
microalloy forgings for use by original equipment manufacturers and industrial
end users. Dalton manufactures gray iron castings for refrigeration systems, air
conditioners, heavy equipment, engines, gear boxes, stationary transmissions,
heavy duty truck transmissions and other automotive parts. ACP manufactures
ductile and malleable iron castings which are sold to companies in various
industrial segments, including heavy truck, construction equipment, railroad,
mining and automotive.
The Company operates in one business segment - the manufacture of castings and
forged components. The Company's products are sold throughout the United States
and several foreign countries to a large number of well established customers.
Sales to three customers totaled $71,979 of net sales for the year ended
September 30, 1998 and sales to two customers totaled $21,879 of net sales for
the five months ended September 30, 1997. Accounts receivable from such
customers totaled $12,651 and $5,214 at September 30, 1998 and 1997,
respectively. The Company's accounts receivable generally are unsecured.
The Company changed its fiscal year end to September 30 effective September 30,
1997.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Neenah and its
wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
52
53
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows, the Company considers
all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when
purchased to be cash equivalents.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. The cost of inventories
for Neenah and Dalton is determined on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for
substantially all inventories except for supplies, for which cost is determined
on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The cost of inventories for Deeter,
Mercer and ACP is determined on the FIFO method. LIFO inventories comprise 67%
and 83% of total inventories at Septem-ber 30, 1998 and 1997, respectively.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Expenditures for additions and improvements to property, plant and equipment are
capitalized at cost while replacements, maintenance and repairs which do not
improve or extend the lives of the respective assets are expensed as incurred.
Depreciation for financial reporting purposes is provided over the estimated
useful lives of the respective assets, using the straight-line method.
DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS
Costs incurred to obtain long-term financing are amortized using the interest
method over the term of the related debt.
53
54
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Identifiable intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives of four months to 40 years.
GOODWILL
Goodwill is amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 to 40 years.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets are reviewed
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected undiscounted
cash flows is less than the carrying value of the related asset or group of
assets, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and
carrying value of the asset or group of assets. Such analyses necessarily
involve significant judgment.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue is recognized upon shipment of product to the customer.
ADVERTISING COSTS
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred, and amounted to $662 for the year
ended September 30, 1998 and $292 for the five months ended September 30, 1997.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the
financial reporting and income tax basis of the Company's assets and liabilities
and are measured using currently enacted tax rates and laws.
54
55
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company has a number of financial instruments, none of which are held for
trading purposes. The following presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair
values of such instruments:
SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
-------------------------------- -------------------------------
Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
Amount Value Amount Value
-------------- ----------------- -------------- ----------------
Cash and cash equivalents $ 19,798 $ 19,798 $ 20,346 $ 20,346
Accounts receivable 71,655 71,655 36,907 36,907
Accounts payable 29,920 29,920 14,852 14,852
Long-term debt (1) 371,871 371,367 218,413 234,416
(1) The fair value of the Senior Subordinated Notes is based on quoted market
prices.
PENDING ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities," which is required to be adopted in years
beginning after June 15, 1999. Because of the Company's minimal use of
derivatives, management does not anticipate that the adoption of SFAS No. 133
will have a significant effect on the results of operations or on the financial
position of the Company.
In June 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued SFAS No. 131,
"Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information." SFAS No.
131 establishes the standards by which public enterprises are required to report
financial and descriptive information about their operating segments. SFAS No.
131 defines operating segments as components of an enterprise for which separate
financial information is available and evaluated regularly as a means for
assessing segment performance and allocating resources to segments. A measure of
profit or loss, total assets and other related information are required to be
disclosed for each operating segment. In addition, SFAS No. 131 requires the
annual disclosure of information concerning revenues derived from the
enterprise's products or services, countries in which it earns revenue or holds
assets, and major customers. SFAS No. 131 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 1997. The adoption of SFAS No. 131 will not affect
the Company's results of operations, financial position, or cash flows, but may
affect the disclosure of segment information.
2. ACQUISITIONS
On March 30, 1998, Neenah purchased Deeter, a manufacturer of gray iron
castings, for $20,759 in cash (including direct costs of $313) and a $3,850 note
issued by ACP Holding Company payable to the selling shareholders of Deeter
which has been accounted for as a contribution to the capital of Neenah.
55
56
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
On April 3, 1998, Neenah purchased Mercer, a manufacturer of forged components,
for $47,420 (including direct costs of $525 and net of $154 of acquired cash).
The acquisition of Mercer was financed through borrowings under the Tranche B
term loan.
On September 8, 1998, Neenah purchased Dalton, a manufacturer of gray iron
castings, for $100,930 (including direct costs of $601 and net of $1,679 of
acquired cash). The acquisition of Dalton was financed through drawings under
the Tranche B term loan and the Acquisition Loan Facility.
The acquisitions of Deeter, Mercer and Dalton have been accounted for using the
purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the purchase price has been
allocated on the basis of fair values to the underlying assets acquired and
liabilities assumed. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value
of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired has been
allocated to goodwill. The operating results of Deeter, Mercer and Dalton are
included in the consolidated statements of income since the date of their
respective acquisition.
On September 8, 1998, the capital stock of ACP was contributed to Neenah by ACP
Holding Company. ACP is a manufacturer of ductile and malleable iron castings.
In connection with the merger, Neenah assumed $14,613 of indebtedness of ACP
which was subsequently refinanced through borrowings under the Tranche B term
loan. The acquisition of ACP was accounted for in a manner similar to a pooling
of interests because Neenah and ACP were under common control. Accordingly, the
prior period financial statements of the Company for the period during which
Neenah and ACP were under common ownership have been restated.
56
57
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
2. ACQUISITIONS (CONTINUED)
Pro forma unaudited consolidated operating results of the Company, assuming
Deeter, Mercer and Dalton had all been acquired as of October 1, 1997 and as of
May 1, 1997, are summarized below:
TWELVE MONTHS ENDED FIVE MONTHS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 1997
----------------------------- ----------------------------
Net sales $507,458 $203,205
Income before extraordinary item 7,644 4,991
Net income 7,252 2,969
These pro forma results have been prepared for informational purposes only and
include certain adjustments to depreciation expense related to acquired plant
and equipment, amortization expense arising from goodwill and identifiable
intangible assets, interest expense on acquisition debt, and the estimated
related income tax effects of all such adjustments. The pro forma results do not
purport to be indicative of the results of operations which would have resulted
had the business combinations occurred on October 1, 1997 and May 1, 1997, or of
the future results of operations of the consolidated entities.
3. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following as of September 30:
1998 1997
---------------- -----------------
Raw materials $ 4,550 $ 2,148
Work in process and finished goods 28,141 15,544
Supplies 8,150 4,572
---------------- -----------------
$40,841 $22,264
================ =================
If the FIFO method of inventory valuation had been used on all components,
inventories would have been approximately $499 higher than reported at September
30, 1998. At September 30, 1997, inventories valued at LIFO approximated their
FIFO cost.
57
58
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
4. IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Identifiable intangible assets consist of the following as of September 30:
1998 1997
----------------------------------
Customer lists $30,341 $14,200
Trade names 19,853 11,700
Assembled work force 8,142 2,050
Facilities in place 3,764 --
Other 5,139 3,021
---------------------------------
67,239 30,971
Less accumulated amortization 6,153 2,491
----------------------------------
$61,086 $28,480
==================================
5. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following as of September 30:
1998 1997
----------------------------------
11 1/8% Series B Senior Subordinated Notes $150,000 $150,000
11 1/8% Series D Senior Subordinated Notes, including unamortized
premium of $2,259 in 1998 and $2,522 in 1997
47,259 47,522
Term Loan Facilities 145,000 --
Acquisition Loan Facility 29,000 --
12% senior subordinated notes due to shareholder -- 6,746
Bank term loan -- 11,000
Bank revolving credit note payable -- 1,919
Bank equipment loan -- 712
Capital lease obligations 612 514
----------------------------------
371,871 218,413
Less current portion 4,185 2,672
----------------------------------
$367,686 $215,741
==================================
The Series B and Series D Senior Subordinated Notes (collectively, the Notes)
are unsecured and mature on May 1, 2007. Interest is payable semiannually on May
1 and November 1. The Notes are fully, unconditionally, jointly and severally
guaranteed by Transport, Hartley, Deeter, Mercer, Dalton and ACP (Guarantor
Subsidiaries). The Notes
58
59
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
5. LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)
are subordinated to all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company
but rank equally in right of payment with any future senior subordinated
indebtedness of the Company. The Notes contain covenants which restrict the
Company from incurring additional indebtedness and prohibit dividend payments,
stock redemptions and certain other transactions.
The Series D Senior Subordinated Notes were issued on July 1, 1997. The Company
used the proceeds to repay the term loans used to finance the acquisition of the
Company on April 30, 1997, accrued interest thereon and related fees and
expenses. In connection with the prepayment in full of the term loans during the
five months ended September 30, 1997, the Company recorded an extraordinary
charge to write off the unamortized balance of the related deferred financing
costs of $2,629.
The Company has a Credit Agreement with a bank which provides a) Term Loan
Facilities of $145 million, b) an Acquisition Loan Facility of $50 million and
c) a Revolving Credit Facility of $50 million.
The Term Loan Facilities consist of two tranches of term loans. The Tranche A
term loans total $20 million and mature on September 30, 2003. The Tranche B
term loans total $125 million and mature on September 30, 2005. Installments of
the Tranche A term loans are due in aggregate principal amounts of $750 per
quarter until September 30, 1999, $1,000 per quarter from December 31, 1999
through September 30, 2002 and $1,250 per quarter from December 31, 2002 through
September 30, 2003. Installments on $55 million of the Tranche B term loans are
due in aggregate principal amounts of $250 per quarter until September 30, 2003
and $6,250 per quarter from December 31, 2003 through September 30, 2005.
Installments on $70 million of the Tranche B term loans are due in aggregate
principal amounts of $8,750 per quarter commencing on December 31, 2003 and
continuing through September 30, 2005. Interest on the Tranche A and Tranche B
term loans is at LIBOR (5.5625% at September 30, 1998) plus 2.50% and 2.75%,
respectively.
Loans under the Acquisition Loan Facility may be paid and reborrowed at any time
through September 8, 2000. Outstanding borrowing under the Acquisition Loan
Facility on September 8, 2000 will be repaid quarterly beginning on such date
through June 30, 2004. Interest on borrowings under the Acquisition Loan
Facility is at LIBOR plus 2.50%.
59
60
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
5. LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)
The 12% senior subordinated notes were converted into the equity of ACP by ACP
Holding Company, its sole shareholder, effective September 8, 1998. The Company
used the proceeds of the Tranche A term loan to repay the bank term loan,
revolving credit note payable and equipment loan. In connection with the
repayment in full of these bank obligations during the year ended September 30,
1998, the Company recorded an extraordinary charge to write off the unamortized
balance of the related deferred financing costs of $652.
Scheduled maturities of long-term debt during fiscal years subsequent to
September 30, 1998, are as follows:
1999 $ 4,185
2000 6,893
2001 12,334
2002 12,280
2003 13,250
Thereafter 320,670
----------------------
$369,612
======================
The Company is entitled to draw amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility for
general corporate purposes, including permitted acquisitions, as defined. The
Revolving Credit Facility includes a $15 million sub-limit for letters of credit
and matures on April 30, 2002.
Covenants contained in the Revolving Credit Facility restrict the payment of
dividends, capital expenditures and certain other transactions and require the
Company to maintain leverage, net worth and interest coverage ratios.
60
61
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
6. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company leases certain plants, warehouse space, machinery and equipment,
office equipment and vehicles under operating leases. Rent expense under these
operating leases for the year ended September 30, 1998 and for the five-month
period ended September 30, 1997 totaled $1,485 and $515, respectively. Minimum
rental payments due under these operating leases for fiscal years subsequent to
September 30, 1998 are as follows:
1999 $1,483
2000 962
2001 690
2002 514
2003 297
----------------------
$3,946
======================
The Company is involved in a number of product liability claims and
environmental matters, none of which, in the opinion of management, is expected
to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial statements.
The Company is partially self-insured for workers compensation claims. An
accrued liability is recorded for claims incurred but not yet paid or reported
and is based on current and historical claim information. The accrued liability
may ultimately be settled for an amount greater or lesser than the recorded
amount. Adjustments of the accrued liability are recorded in the period in which
they become known.
As of September 30, 1998, the Company had outstanding letters of credit of
$4,600, which secure certain workers compensation and other obligations. The
outstanding letters of credit reduce the availability under the Revolving Credit
Facility.
7. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
SEPTEMBER 30
1998 1997
--------------------------------------
Current:
Federal $11,126 $ 5,835
State 2,233 1,236
--------------------------------------
13,359 7,071
Deferred (2,437) (3,071)
--------------------------------------
$10,922 $ 4,000
======================================
61
62
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
7. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The provision for income taxes differs from the amount computed by applying the
federal statutory rate of 35% as of September 30, 1998 and 34% as of September
30, 1997 to income before income taxes and extraordinary item as follows:
TWELVE MONTHS FIVE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30 ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
1998 1997
------------------------------------------------------
Provision at statutory rate $ 7,981 $2,844
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit 1,148 480
Amortization of goodwill 1,389 550
Other 404 126
--------------------------- -------------------------
Provision for income taxes $10,922 $4,000
=========================== =========================
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the following as of
September 30:
1998 1997
---------------------------------------------------
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Book basis of inventories in excess of tax basis $ (3,221) $ (3,265)
Book basis of property, plant and equipment in
excess of tax basis (46,447) (34,630)
Book basis of identifiable intangible
assets in excess of tax basis (24,476) (11,370)
Employee benefit plans (590) (720)
Other (572) (660)
------------------------ ------------------------
(75,306) (50,645)
Deferred income tax assets:
Employee benefit plans 6,919 2,805
Accrued vacation 1,989 1,117
Other accrued liabilities 2,667 1,299
Other 550 384
------------------------ ------------------------
12,125 5,605
------------------------ ------------------------
Net deferred income tax liability $(63,181) $(45,040)
======================== ========================
Included in the consolidated balance sheet as:
Current deferred income tax asset $ 4,888 $ 1,884
Noncurrent deferred income tax liability (68,069) (46,924)
------------------------ ------------------------
$(63,181) $(45,040)
======================== ========================
62
63
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS
The Company sponsors five defined benefit pension plans covering the majority of
its hourly employees. Retirement benefits under the pension plans are based on
years of service and defined benefit rates. The Company funds the pension plans
based on actuarially determined cost methods allowable under Internal Revenue
Service regulations.
The following table presents the funded status of the pension plans and the
amounts included in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 1998 and
1997:
1998 1997
----------------- --------------------------------
Underfunded Underfunded Overfunded
Plans Plan Plans
----------------- --------------------------------
Actuarial present value of benefit obligations:
Vested benefit obligations $ (34,772) $ (821) $(21,174)
================= ================================
Accumulated benefit obligations $ (36,759) $ (836) $(21,768)
================= ================================
Projected benefit obligations $ (36,759) $ (836) $(21,768)
Plan assets at fair value (consisting principally of
pooled investment funds and an investment contract
with an insurance company) 33,299 776 25,307
----------------- --------------------------------
Projected benefit obligations less than (in excess of)
plan assets (3,460) (60) 3,539
Unrecognized net (gain) loss 2,612 (3) (1,585)
Unrecognized prior service cost 313 -- 58
Recorded additional minimum liability (2,931) -- --
----------------- --------------------------------
Prepaid (accrued) pension obligations $ (3,466) $ (63) $ 2,012
================= ================================
Net pension asset (liability) included in:
Other assets $ 1,676 $ 1,949
Other liabilities (5,142) --
----------------- ----------------
$ (3,466) $ 1,949
================= ================
63
64
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
Because the accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair value of plan assets
at September 30, 1998, the Company has recorded the minimum liability. An
intangible asset of $313 at September 30, 1998 has been recognized related to
the minimum liability. Because the intangible asset may not exceed the amount of
the unrecognized prior service costs, the balance of $2,618, net of deferred
income tax benefit of $1,048, is reported as a reduction of stockholder's
equity.
Components of net periodic pension cost for the year ended September 30, 1998
and the five months ended September 30, 1997 are as follows:
1998 1997
-----------------------------------------
Service cost - benefits earned during the period $ 749 $ 251
Interest cost on projected benefit obligations 1,716 688
Actual return on plan assets (1,403) (802)
Net amortization and deferral (591) 49
------------------ --------------------
$ 471 $ 186
================== ====================
The discount rates used in estimating the projected benefit obligations and in
determining the interest cost component of pension expense for the following
year ranged from 6.75% to 7.25% in 1998 (7.25% to 7.5% in 1997). The assumed
long-term rate of return on plan assets used in determining pension expense
ranged from 7.5% to 9.5% in 1998 (7.5% to 9.5% in 1997).
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION RETIREMENT PLANS
The Company sponsors various defined contribution retirement plans (the Plans)
covering substantially all salaried and certain hourly employees. The Plans
allow participants to make 401(k) contributions in amounts ranging from 1% to
15% of their compensation. The Company matches between 35% and 50% of the
participants' contributions, as defined. The Company may make additional
voluntary contributions to the Plans as determined annually by the Board of
Directors. Total Company contributions amounted to $994 and $423 for the year
ended September 30, 1998 and for the five months ended September 30, 1997,
respectively.
64
65
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company sponsors unfunded defined benefit postretirement health care plans
covering substantially all salaried and hourly employees at Neenah and Hartley
and their dependents. For Hartley and salaried employees at Neenah, benefits are
provided from the date of retirement for the duration of the employee's life
while benefits for hourly employees at Neenah are provided from retirement to
age 65. Retirees' contributions to the plans are based on years of service and
age at retirement. The Company funds benefits as incurred.
The following table reconciles the funded status of the postretirement benefit
plans to the amounts included in the consolidated balance sheet at September 30,
1998 and 1997:
1998 1997
-------------------------------
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligations:
Retirees $2,614 $2,191
Fully eligible active participants 45 801
Other active participants 3,455 1,902
------------------------------
6,114 4,894
Unrecognized net gain (894) --
==============================
Accrued postretirement benefit obligations $5,220 $4,894
==============================
Components of net periodic postretirement benefit costs for the year ended
September 30, 1998 and the five months ended September 30, 1997 are as follows:
1998 1997
-------------------------------
Service cost $152 $ 58
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligations
366 148
------------------------------
$518 $206
==============================
The weighted-average discount rate used in determining the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligations was 7.0% in 1998 and 7.5% in 1997, and the
healthcare cost trend rate was assumed to be 8.5% decreasing gradually to 4.5%
in 2010 and then remain at that
65
66
Neenah Foundry Company
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
8. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
level thereafter. The healthcare cost trend rate assumption has a significant
effect on the amounts reported. Increasing the healthcare cost trend rate by one
percentage point would increase the accumulated postretirement benefit
obligations as of September 30, 1998 by $1,051 and would increase postretirement
benefit expense for the year ended September 30, 1998 by $112.
OTHER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
The Company provides unfunded supplemental retirement benefits to certain active
and retired employees at Dalton. At September 30, 1998, the present value of the
current and long-term portion of these supplemental retirement obligations
totaled $45 and $2,975, respectively.
Certain of Dalton's hourly employees are covered by a multi-employer defined
benefit pension plan pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. The
Company's expense was $53 from September 8, 1998, the date of acquisition,
through September 30, 1998.
The Company sponsors a noncontributory, multi-employer defined benefit pension
plan for substantially all of the union employees at Mercer pursuant to a
collective bargaining agreement. The Company's expense was $107 from April 3,
1998, the date of acquisition, through September 30, 1998.
9. GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES
All of the wholly owned subsidiaries of Neenah (Transport, Hartley, Deeter,
Mercer, Dalton and ACP collectively, Guarantor Subsidiaries) fully,
unconditionally, jointly and severally guarantee the Notes. The following is
summarized combined financial information of the Guarantor Subsidiaries. Net
sales include net sales to Neenah of $4,613 for the year ended September 30,
1998 and $2,048 for the five months ended September 30, 1997. Separate financial
statements of the Guarantor Subsidiaries are not separately presented because,
in the opinion of management, such financial statements are not material to
investors.
SEPTEMBER 30
1998 1997
----------------------------------------------
Current assets $ 77,594 $12,188
Noncurrent assets 191,793 22,256
Current liabilities 34,708 10,507
Noncurrent liabilities 32,405 21,006
66
67
9. GUARANTOR SUBSIDIARIES (CONTINUED)
YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, FIVE MONTHS ENDED
1998 SEPTEMBER 30, 1997
------------------------------------------------------
Net sales $118,449 $25,492
Gross profit 21,766 5,512
Net income 3,355 897
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On November 24, 1998, the Company sold $87,000 of 11 1/8% Series E Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2007. The proceeds of $90,045 were used to pay down the
Acquisition Loan Facility and for general corporate purposes.
67
68
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY
(PREDECESSOR)
Years ended
March 31, 1996 and 1997 and
one month ended April 30, 1997
68
69
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended March 31, 1996 and 1997
and one month ended April 30, 1997
CONTENTS
Report of Independent Auditors..................................................
Consolidated Balance Sheets.....................................................
Consolidated Statements of Income...............................................
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity......................
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows...........................................
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements......................................
69
70
Report of Independent Auditors
Board of Directors
Neenah Foundry Company (formerly
Neenah Corporation - see Note 1)
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Neenah Foundry
Company (the Company) as of March 31, 1996 and 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash
flows for the years then ended, and for the one month ended April 30, 1997.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the
Company as of March 31, 1996 and 1997, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, and for the one month
ended April 30, 1997, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
June 4, 1997, except for Notes 1 and 10
as to which the date is July 1, 1997
70
71
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
MARCH 31
1996 1997
---------------------------------
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 10,126 $ 22,403
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $386 at
March 31, 1996 and 1997 20,831 21,423
Inventories 13,324 13,956
Other current assets - 401
Deferred income taxes 2,253 2,325
----------------------------
Total current assets 46,534 60,508
Property, plant and equipment:
Land 847 847
Buildings and improvements 14,972 15,063
Machinery and equipment 97,749 101,655
----------------------------
113,568 117,565
Less accumulated depreciation 79,840 86,186
----------------------------
33,728 31,379
Other assets 2,695 1,982
----------------------------
$ 82,957 $ 93,869
============================
71
72
MARCH 31
1996 1997
---------------------------------
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 8,124 $ 8,497
Dividends payable 2,220 -
Income taxes payable 517 573
Accrued wages and employee benefits 5,516 5,545
Other accrued liabilities 1,937 2,052
Current portion of long-term debt 107 134
-------------------------------
Total current liabilities 18,421 16,801
Long-term debt 134 -
Pension obligations 1,737 -
Postretirement benefit obligations 5,300 5,667
Deferred income taxes 2,575 2,544
--------------------------------
Total liabilities 28,167 25,012
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, par value $100 per share:
Authorized 3,000 shares; no shares issued and outstanding
- -
Common stock, par value $100 per share:
Class A (voting):
Authorized 1,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 620 shares
62 62
Class B (nonvoting):
Authorized 10,000 shares; issued and outstanding, 3,820 shares
382 382
Retained earnings 57,268 71,335
Notes receivable from owners to finance stock purchase (2,922) (2,922)
---------------------------------
Total stockholders' equity 54,790 68,857
=================================
$82,957 $93,869
=================================
See accompanying notes.
72
73
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Consolidated Statements of Income
(In Thousands)
ONE MONTH
ENDED
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31 APRIL 30
1996 1997 1997
---------------------------------------------
Net sales $166,951 $165,426 $17,276
Cost of sales 121,631 116,736 11,351
---------------------------------------------
Gross profit 45,320 48,690 5,925
Selling, general and administrative expenses 16,983 17,547 1,752
---------------------------------------------
Operating income 28,337 31,143 4,173
Net interest income (expense) 481 1,162 121
---------------------------------------------
Income before income taxes 28,818 32,305 4,294
Provision for income taxes 11,676 12,467 1,615
=============================================
Net income $ 17,142 $ 19,838 $ 2,679
=============================================
See accompanying notes.
73
74
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
(In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
Common Stock
-------------------------------- Notes Receivable
Preferred Stock Class A Class B Retained from Owners
-------------------------------------------------------- to Finance
Shares Amount Shares Amount Shares Amount Earnings Stock Purchase Total
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at April 1, 1995 - $ - 620 $62 3,820 $382 $45,676 $(2,922) $43,198
Common dividends declared -
$1,250 per share - - - - - - (5,550) - (5,550)
Net income - - - - - - 17,142 - 17,142
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at March 31, 1996 - - 620 62 3,820 382 57,268 (2,922) 54,790
Common dividends declared -
$1,300 per share - - - - - - (5,771) - (5,771)
Net income - - - - - - 19,838 - 19,838
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at March 31, 1997 - - 620 62 3,820 382 71,335 (2,922) 68,857
Collection of notes
receivable from owners - - - - - - - 2,922 2,922
Net income - - - - - - 2,679 - 2,679
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance at April 30, 1997 - $ - 620 $62 3,820 $382 $74,014 $ - $74,458
================================================================================================
See accompanying notes.
74
75
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In Thousands)
ONE MONTH
ENDED
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31 APRIL 30
1996 1997 1997
------------------------------------------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income $ 17,142 $19,838 $ 2,679
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation 6,776 6,881 518
Deferred income taxes 1,863 (103) (120)
Other 48 (103) -
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 439 (592) (3,764)
Inventories (603) (632) 495
Other current assets 27 (401) 401
Accounts payable (2,653) 373 1,308
Income taxes payable (585) 56 1,734
Accrued liabilities (1,261) 144 (185)
Pension obligations 859 (2,349) 822
Postretirement benefit obligations 221 367 29
------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 22,273 23,479 3,917
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of property, plant and equipment (7,275) (4,546) (190)
Proceeds from life insurance policy - 1,439 -
Other (24) 3 (1)
------------------------------------------
Net cash used in investing activities (7,299) (3,104) (191)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Dividends paid (4,440) (7,991) -
Redemption of stock - - -
Proceeds from long-term debt 16,370 - -
Payments on long-term debt (17,016) (107) (5)
Collection of notes receivable from owners - - 2,922
------------------------------------------
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (5,086) (8,098) 2,917
------------------------------------------
Increase in cash and cash equivalents 9,888 12,277 6,643
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 238 10,126 22,403
------------------------------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 10,126 $22,403 $29,046
==========================================
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid for:
Interest $ 84 $ 39 $ 1
Income taxes 10,398 12,515 -
See accompanying notes.
75
76
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Years ended March 31, 1996 and 1997
and one month ended April 30, 1997
(In Thousands)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
Prior to July 1, 1997, Neenah Foundry Company was one of three wholly owned
subsidiaries of Neenah Corporation, a holding company with no significant assets
or operations other than its holdings in the common stock of its subsidiaries.
On July 1, 1997, Neenah Foundry Company merged into Neenah Corporation and the
surviving company changed its name to Neenah Foundry Company (the Company).
The Company operates in one business segment for financial reporting purposes:
the manufacture of gray and ductile iron castings. The Company manufactures
castings for sale to industrial and municipal customers throughout the United
States and several foreign countries. Industrial castings are custom-engineered
and are produced for customers in several industries, with a concentration in
the medium and heavy-duty truck components, farm equipment, and heating,
ventilation, and air-conditioning industries. Municipal castings include manhole
covers and frames, storm sewer frames and grates, trench drain systems, tree
grates and specialty castings for a variety of applications.
Industrial castings are generally sold to large, well-established companies,
with two customers accounting for 17% and 9% of net sales in fiscal 1996, 16%
and 10% of net sales in fiscal 1997 and 29% and 24% of net sales for the one
month ended April 30, 1997. Combined receivables from these two customers
totaled $4,974 and $6,651 at March 31, 1996 and 1997, respectively. Municipal
castings are sold to a large number of customers. The Company's accounts
receivable generally are unsecured.
The Company has two wholly owned subsidiaries--Neenah Transport, Inc.
(Transport) and Hartley Controls Corporation (Hartley). Transport is a common
and contract carrier licensed to operate in the continental United States. The
majority of Transport's revenues are derived from transport services provided to
the Company. Hartley designs and manufactures customized sand control systems
for the foundry industry, which are sold and serviced throughout the United
States and several foreign countries. Hartley and Transport each account for
less than 10% of consolidated net sales, net income and total assets.
76
77
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and
its wholly owned subsidiaries, Transport and Hartley. All significant
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
For purposes of the consolidated statement of cash flows, the Company considers
all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when
purchased to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents, consisting principally of
investments in commercial paper, totaled $11,598 and $23,028 at March 31, 1996
and 1997, respectively. The cost of these debt securities, which are considered
as "available for sale" for financial reporting purposes, approximates fair
value at both March 31, 1996 and 1997. There were no realized gains or losses
recognized on these securities during the years ended March 31, 1996 and 1997 or
the one month ended April 30, 1997.
INVENTORIES
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on the
last-in, first-out (LIFO) method for substantially all inventories except for
supplies, for which cost is determined on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Expenditures for additions
and improvements are capitalized while replacements, maintenance and repairs
which do not improve or extend the lives of the respective assets are expensed
as incurred.
77
78
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
Depreciation for financial reporting purposes is provided over the estimated
useful lives of the respective assets, using accelerated and straight-line
methods. Depreciation expense includes amortization of machinery and equipment
recorded under capitalized leases.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Revenue from the sale of castings and sand control systems is recognized upon
shipment to the customer.
ADVERTISING COSTS
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred, and amounted to $527, $524 and $55
for the years ended March 31, 1996 and 1997 and one month ended April 30, 1997,
respectively.
INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the
financial reporting and income tax basis of the Company's assets and liabilities
and are measured using currently enacted tax rates and laws.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company has a number of financial instruments, none of which are held for
trading purposes. The Company estimates that the fair value of all financial
instruments at March 31, 1996 and 1997 does not differ materially from the
carrying value of such instruments recorded in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets, as follows:
MARCH 31
1996 1997
----------------- --------------
Cash and cash equivalents $10,126 $22,403
Accounts receivable 20,831 21,423
Accounts payable 8,124 8,497
Long-term debt 241 134
78
79
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED)
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
The Company adopted FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.
121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Assets to Be
Disposed Of," and SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," on
April 1, 1996, SFAS No. 125, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of
Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities," on January 1, 1997, and
Statement of Position 96-1, "Environmental Remediation Liabilities," on April 1,
1997. The adoption of these statements did not have any effect on the Company's
consolidated financial statements.
In accordance with SFAS No. 121, the Company records impairment losses on
long-lived assets used in operations when events and circumstances indicate that
the assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be
generated by those assets are less than the carrying amounts of those assets.
2. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following:
MARCH 31
1996 1997
-----------------------------
Raw materials $ 2,214 $ 2,017
Work in process and finished goods 13,957 14,324
Supplies 4,886 4,860
-----------------------------
Inventories at FIFO cost 21,057 21,201
Excess of FIFO cost over LIFO cost (7,733) (7,245)
=============================
$13,324 $13,956
=============================
3. LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following:
MARCH 31
1996 1997
--------------------------------
Capital lease obligations $241 $134
Less current portion 107 134
--------------------------------
$134 $ -
================================
79
80
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
3. LONG-TERM DEBT (CONTINUED)
The Company has a revolving credit agreement (the Agreement) with a bank that
provides for borrowings up to $25,000 through July 31, 1998. Interest is payable
monthly on outstanding borrowings at the bank's Reference Rate (8.25% at March
31, 1997). The Agreement contains an option that allows the Company to designate
a portion (minimum of $2,000) of the borrowings to bear a fixed rate of interest
for a specified period of time. Borrowings under the Agreement are unsecured and
a quarterly fee is charged by the bank on the unused portion of the facility.
The capital lease obligations consist of leases for a propane system and
semi-tractors and trailers. Included in machinery and equipment is $567 and
$397, and included in accumulated depreciation is $272 and $179 at March 31,
1996 and 1997, respectively, related to these capital leases.
4. NOTES RECEIVABLE FROM OWNERS
The notes receivable from owners of $2,922 were repaid by the owners prior to
the consummation of the plan of reorganization described in Note 10. The
proceeds of the notes receivable were used to purchase 1,461 shares of Company
Class B common stock from other shareholders, and were secured by such common
stock.
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company leases warehouse space, machinery and equipment, office equipment
and vehicles under operating leases. Rent expense under these operating leases
for the years ended March 31, 1996 and 1997 and one month ended April 30, 1997
amounted to $996, $1,088 and $85, respectively. Minimum rental payments due
under these operating leases for subsequent fiscal years are as follows:
1998 $ 736
1999 586
2000 287
2001 115
-------------------
$1,724
===================
80
81
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (CONTINUED)
The Company is involved in a number of product liability claims, none of which,
in the opinion of management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on
the consolidated financial statements.
The Company is partially self-insured for workers compensation claims. An
accrued liability is recorded for claims incurred but not yet paid or reported,
with such accrual based on current and historical claim information. The accrual
may ultimately be settled for an amount greater or lesser than the recorded
amount. Adjustments of the accrual are recorded in the period in which they are
determined.
As of March 31, 1997, the Company had outstanding letters of credit in the
aggregate amount of $595, which secure certain workers compensation and other
obligations.
6. INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes consists of the following:
ONE MONTH
ENDED
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31 APRIL 30
1996 1997 1997
-------------------------------------------
Current:
Federal $ 9,147 $11,554 $1,460
State 666 1,016 275
-------------------------------------------
9,813 12,570 1,735
Deferred 1,863 (103) (120)
===========================================
$11,676 $12,467 $1,615
===========================================
The difference between the provision for income taxes and income taxes computed
using the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% is as follows:
ONE MONTH
ENDED
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31 APRIL 30
1996 1997 1997
------------------------------------------
Provision at statutory rate $10,086 $11,307 $1,503
State income taxes, net of federal
tax benefit 1,126 1,318 112
Other 464 (158) -
==========================================
Provision for income taxes $11,676 $12,467 $1,615
==========================================
81
82
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
6. INCOME TAXES (CONTINUED)
The components of the Company's deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
as follows:
MARCH 31
1996 1997
-----------------------------
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Tax depreciation in excess of book depreciation $(5,621) $(5,156)
Employee benefit plans (602) (441)
Other (437) (127)
------------------------------
(6,660) (5,724)
Deferred income tax assets:
Inventories 560 560
Employee benefit plans 3,316 3,128
Accrued vacation 825 855
Other accrued liabilities 672 790
State tax credit carryforwards 676 -
Other 289 172
------------------------------
6,338 5,505
==============================
Net deferred income tax liability $ (322) $ (219)
==============================
Included in the consolidated balance sheets as:
Current deferred income tax asset $ 2,253 $ 2,325
Noncurrent deferred income tax liability (2,575) (2,544)
==============================
$ (322) $ (219)
==============================
The Company has not recorded a valuation allowance with respect to any deferred
tax assets at March 31, 1996 or 1997.
7. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS
The Company sponsors two defined benefit pension plans covering substantially
all hourly employees and previously sponsored a defined benefit supplemental
executive retirement plan (SERP) which covered certain salaried employees.
During the year ended March 31, 1997, the Company purchased nonparticipating
annuity contracts to settle the vested benefit obligations under the SERP.
Retirement benefits for the pension plans are based on years of credited service
and defined benefit rates while retirement benefits for
82
83
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
7. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
the SERP were based on compensation levels. The Company funds the pension plans
based on an actuarially determined cost method allowable under Internal Revenue
Service regulations. The SERP was unfunded.
The following table reconciles the funded status of the pension plans, as of
December 31, 1995 and 1996 (the Company uses a measurement date as of December
31), to the amounts included in the consolidated balance sheets at March 31,
1996 and 1997:
1996 1997
-----------------------------------------------------------
Underfunded Overfunded Underfunded Overfunded
Plans Plan Plan Plan
-----------------------------------------------------------
Accumulated benefit obligations $(3,944) $(19,805) $(845) $(20,150)
Effect of assumed increases in compensation on
SERP (2,593) - - -
-----------------------------------------------------------
Projected benefit obligations (6,537) (19,805) (845) (20,150)
Plan assets at fair value (consisting
principally of pooled investment funds and
an investment contract with an insurance
company) 697 21,110 735 22,169
-----------------------------------------------------------
Projected benefit obligations less than
(in excess of) plan assets (5,840) 1,305 (110) 2,019
Unrecognized net loss (gain) 2,055 (1,940) (8) (2,966)
Unrecognized prior service cost 259 4,833 160 4,452
Unrecognized net transition obligation (asset) 782 (2,695) (21) (2,411)
Adjustment to recognize additional minimum
liability (503) - (131) -
-----------------------------------------------------------
Prepaid (accrued) pension obligation, at
December 31, 1995 and December 31, 1996,
respectively (3,247) 1,503 (110) 1,094
Contributions between January 1 and March 31,
1996 and 1997, respectively 7 - - -
===========================================================
Prepaid (accrued) pension obligations $(3,240) $ 1,503 $(110) $ 1,094
===========================================================
Net pension asset (obligation) included in
the consolidated balance sheets $(1,737) $ 984
=============== ===============
83
84
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
7. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
Components of net periodic pension cost are as follows:
ONE MONTH
ENDED
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31 APRIL 30
1996 1997 1997
----------------------------------------------
Service cost - benefits earned during the year $ 880 $ 820 $ 38
Interest cost on projected benefit obligations 1,545 1,742 125
Actual return on plan assets (1,450) (1,531) (132)
Net amortization and deferral 203 220 (1)
==============================================
$ 1,178 $ 1,251 $ 30
==============================================
As a result of the settlement of the SERP, the Company recognized a curtailment
gain of $1,317 and a settlement loss of $878 during the year ended March 31,
1997. The discount rate used in estimating the projected benefit obligations and
in determining the interest cost component of pension expense for the following
year was 7.5% for both years. The annual rate of compensation increase assumed
for the SERP in estimating the projected benefit obligations was 6.5% for both
years. The assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets used in determining
pension expense was 7.5% for both years.
PROFIT-SHARING AND SAVINGS RETIREMENT PLAN
The Company sponsors a Profit-Sharing and Savings Retirement Plan covering
substantially all salaried employees. The plan allows participants to make
401(k) contributions in an amount from 1% to 5% of their compensation. The
Company matches 50% of the participants' contributions. The Company may make
additional voluntary contributions to the plan as determined annually by the
Board of Directors. Total Company contributions amounted to $891, $915 and $82
for the years ended March 31, 1996 and 1997 and one month ended April 30, 1997,
respectively.
POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS
The Company sponsors defined benefit postretirement health care plans covering
substantially all salaried employees and their dependents. Benefits are provided
from the date of retirement for the duration of the employee's life up to a
maximum of $1 million per individual. Retirees' contributions to the plans are
based on years of service and age at retirement. The Company funds benefits as
incurred.
84
85
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
7. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS (CONTINUED)
The following table reconciles the funded status of the postretirement benefit
plans to the amounts included in the consolidated balance sheets at March 31:
1996 1997
-----------------------------
Accumulated postretirement benefit obligations:
Retirees $2,047 $1,830
Fully eligible active participants 654 810
Other active participants 2,534 2,784
------------------------------
5,235 5,424
Plan assets - -
------------------------------
5,235 5,424
Unrecognized net gain 65 243
------------------------------
Accrued postretirement benefit obligations $5,300 $5,667
==============================
Components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost are as follows:
ONE MONTH
ENDED
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31 APRIL 30
1996 1997 1997
---------------------------------------------
Service cost $176 $193 $11
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit
obligations 361 370 27
Net amortization and deferral (4) (5) (7)
---------------------------------------------
$533 $558 $31
=============================================
The weighted-average discount rate used in determining the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligations was 7.5% for both years, and the healthcare
cost trend rate was projected to have annual increases of 8.5%. The healthcare
cost trend rate assumption has a significant effect on the amounts reported.
Increasing the healthcare cost trend rate by one percentage point would increase
the accumulated postretirement benefit obligations as of March 31, 1997 by
$1,014 and would increase postretirement benefit expense for the year ended
March 31, 1997 by $131.
85
86
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
8. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
The Company has a Restrictive Stock Transfer Agreement with certain of its
stockholders which permits the transfer of its stock held by such stockholders
to permitted transferees, as defined. In the event a stockholder wishes to sell
stock to a third party who is not a permitted transferee, the stock must first
be offered for sale to the Company. If the Company accepts the offer of sale,
the purchase price is based on a formula, as defined. The purchase price will be
financed by a promissory note payable in ten equal annual installments with
interest at the prime rate less 1%. The Restrictive Stock Transfer Agreement was
terminated concurrently with the consummation of the plan of reorganization
described in Note 10.
9. UNAUDITED QUARTERLY RESULTS
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1996
Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Net sales $46,277 $44,454 $39,015 $37,205
Gross profit 12,976 12,243 10,199 9,902
Net income 5,325 5,024 3,839 2,954
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
Quarter 1 Quarter 2 Quarter 3 Quarter 4
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Net sales $44,309 $45,430 $37,815 $37,872
Gross profit 13,140 13,613 10,825 11,112
Net income 5,178 5,558 4,635 4,467
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
On April 30, 1997, pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization with NC
Merger Company and NFC Castings, Inc., Neenah Corporation was acquired by NFC
Castings, Inc. using (i) $45,000 of cash equity contributed by NFC Castings,
Inc., (ii) $45,000 of term loans, (iii) proceeds from the issuance of $150,000
of unsecured Senior Subordinated Notes in a Rule 144A private placement and (iv)
Company cash. The consideration for the acquisition is subject to a closing date
net worth adjustment. On July 1, 1997, the Company issued $45,000 of unsecured
Senior Subordinated Notes in a Rule 144A private placement and used the proceeds
to repay the term loans.
86
87
Neenah Foundry Company (Predecessor)
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In Thousands)
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENT (CONTINUED)
As described in Note 1, on July 1, 1997, Neenah Foundry Company, the principal
operating subsidiary of Neenah Corporation, merged into Neenah Corporation.
Transport and Hartley, wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company, fully,
unconditionally, jointly and severally guarantee the Senior Subordinated Notes
issued in the private placement discussed above. The following is summarized
combined financial information of the wholly owned subsidiaries. Net sales
includes net sales to Neenah Foundry Company of $4,090, $4,012 and $365 for the
years ended March 31, 1996 and 1997 and one month ended April 30, 1997,
respectively. Separate financial statements of the guarantor subsidiaries are
not separately presented because, in the opinion of management, such financial
statements are not material to investors.
MARCH 31
1996 1997
--------------- ---------------
Current assets $1,494 $1,867
Noncurrent assets 1,661 1,918
Current liabilities 941 1,006
Noncurrent liabilities 401 453
ONE MONTH
ENDED
YEAR ENDED MARCH 31 APRIL 30
1996 1997 1997
-------------- --------------- ---------------
Net sales $9,795 $9,971 $703
Gross profit 3,165 3,247 169
Net income (loss) 651 513 (15)
87
88
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Neenah Foundry Company
as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and for the twelve months ended September 30,
1998 and for the period from inception, May 1, 1997 through September 30, 1997,
and have issued our report thereon dated November 6, 1998, except for Note 10,
as to which the date is November 24, 1998 (included elsewhere in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K). Our audit also included the financial statement schedule
listed in the index at Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our
audit.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin ERNST & YOUNG LLP
November 6, 1998
88
89
Schedule II
NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Twelve months ended September 30, 1998 and
period from inception, May 1, 1997, through September 30, 1997
(Dollars in Thousands)
BALANCE AT PURCHASE ADDITIONS
BEGINNING ACCOUNTING CHARGED TO BALANCE AT
DESCRIPTION OF PERIOD ADJUSTMENTS EXPENSE DEDUCTIONS END OF PERIOD
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allowance for doubtful accounts receivable:
1997 $ 483 $ - $ 44 $ 36 (A) $ 491
======= ======= ====== ======= ======
1998 $ 491 $ 325 $ 180 $ 143 (A) $ 853
======= ======= ===== ======= ======
(A) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.
89
90
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors
We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Neenah Foundry Company
(formerly Neenah Corporation) as of March 31, 1997 and 1996, and for the years
then ended, and have issued our report thereon dated June 4, 1997, except for
Notes 1 and 10 as to which the date is July 1, 1997 (included elsewhere in this
Annual Report on form 10-k). Our audits also included the financial statement
schedule listed in the index at Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility
of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based
on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.
Milwaukee, Wisconsin ERNST & YOUNG LLP
June 4, 1997
90
91
Schedule II
NEENAH FOUNDRY COMPANY (PREDECESSOR)
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Years ended March 31, 1996 and 1997
(Dollars in Thousands)
BALANCE AT ADDITIONS
BEGINNING CHARGED TO BALANCE AT
DESCRIPTION OF YEAR EXPENSE DEDUCTIONS END OF YEAR
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allowance for doubtful
Accounts receivable:
1996 $ 386 $ 233 $ 233 (A) $ 386
===== ======= ======= ======
1997 $ 386 $ 175 $ 175 (A) $ 386
===== ======= ======= ======
(A) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries.
91