Back to GetFilings.com

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Form 10-Q

Commission file number: 000-50303

Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc.

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12(b)-2 of the Act).     Yes þ          No o

      APPLICABLE ONLY TO REGISTRANTS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Act subsequent to the distributions of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.     Yes þ          No o

      The number of shares of common stock outstanding as of September 7, 2004 was 37,847,078 shares.

HAYES LEMMERZ INTERNATIONAL, INC.

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

      Unless otherwise indicated, references to the “Company” mean Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc., and its subsidiaries, and references to a fiscal year means the Company’s year commencing on February 1 of that year and ending January 31 of the following year (e.g., fiscal 2004 means the period beginning February 1, 2004, and ending January 31, 2005). This report contains forward looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to the financial condition, results of operations, and business of the Company. These forward looking statements involve certain risks and uncertainties. No assurance can be given that any of such matters will be realized. Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated by such forward looking statements include, among others, the following possibilities: (1) competitive pressure in the Company’s industry increases significantly; (2) general economic conditions are less favorable than expected; (3) the Company’s dependence on the automotive industry (which has historically been cyclical); (4) pricing pressure from automotive industry customers; (5) changes in the financial markets affecting the Company’s financial structure and the Company’s cost of capital and borrowed money; (6) the uncertainties inherent in international operations and foreign currency fluctuations; and (7) uncertainties related to conflict in the Middle East. The Company has no duty under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 to update the forward looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the Company does not intend to provide such updates.

2

Table of Contents

HAYES LEMMERZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

HAYES LEMMERZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

HAYES LEMMERZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

HAYES LEMMERZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents

HAYES LEMMERZ INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Description of Business, Chapter 11 Filings and Emergence from Chapter 11

      These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on April 12, 2004.

      Unless otherwise indicated, references to “Company” mean Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc. and its subsidiaries and references to fiscal year means the Company’s fiscal year commencing on February 1 of that year and ending on January 31 of the following year (i.e., “fiscal 2004” refers to the period beginning February 1, 2004 and ending January 31, 2005 and “fiscal 2003” refers to the period beginning February 1, 2003 and ending January 31, 2004).

      The Company is a leading supplier of wheels, wheel-end attachments, aluminum structural components and automotive brake components. The Company is the world’s largest manufacturer of automotive wheels. In addition, the Company also designs and manufactures wheels and brake components for commercial highway vehicles, and powertrain components and aluminum non-structural components for the automotive, commercial highway, heating and general equipment industries.

      On December 5, 2001, Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc. (“Old Hayes”), 30 of its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries and one wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for reorganization relief (the “Chapter 11 Filings” or the “Filings”) under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”).

      On December 16, 2002, certain of the Debtors filed a proposed joint plan of reorganization with the Bankruptcy Court. On April 9, 2003, the Debtors filed a modified first amended joint plan of reorganization (the “Plan of Reorganization”) which received the requisite support from creditors authorized to vote thereon. The following five Debtors were not proponents of the Plan of Reorganization and are not subject to the terms thereof: HLI Netherlands Holdings, Inc., CMI Quaker Alloy, Inc., Hayes Lemmerz Funding Company, LLC, Hayes Lemmerz Funding Corporation, and Hayes Lemmerz International Import, Inc. (collectively, the “Non-reorganizing Debtors”).

      The Plan of Reorganization provided for the cancellation of the existing common stock of the Company and the issuance of cash, new common stock in the reorganized Company and other property to certain creditors of the Company in respect of certain classes of claims. The Plan of Reorganization was confirmed by an order of the Bankruptcy Court on May 12, 2003, which order has become final and non-appealable.

      On June 3, 2003 (the “Effective Date”), Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc. and each of the 27 Debtors proposing the Plan of Reorganization emerged from Chapter 11 proceedings pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, which was confirmed by an order of the Bankruptcy Court on May 12, 2003, which order has become final and non-appealable. The Non-reorganizing Debtors were not proponents of the Plan of Reorganization and are not subject to the terms thereof. On June 3, 2003, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order dismissing the Chapter 11 Filings of the Non-reorganizing Debtors.

7

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization, the Company caused the formation of (i) a new holding company, HLI Holding Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“HoldCo”), (ii) HLI Parent Company, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of HoldCo (“ParentCo”), and (iii) HLI Operating Company, Inc, a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of ParentCo (“HLI”). On the Effective Date, (i) HoldCo was renamed Hayes Lemmerz International, Inc. (“New Hayes”), (ii) New Hayes contributed to ParentCo 30,0000,000 shares of its common stock, par value $.01 per share (the “New Common Stock”), and 957,447 series A warrants and 957,447 series B warrants to acquire New Common Stock of New Hayes (the “Series A Warrants” and “Series B Warrants,” respectively), (iii) ParentCo in turn contributed such shares of New Common Stock and Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants to HLI and (iv) pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 3, 2003 (the “Merger Agreement”), between the Company and HLI, the Company was merged with and into HLI (the “Merger”), with HLI continuing as the surviving corporation.

      Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization and as a result of the Merger, all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, of the Company (the “Old Common Stock”), and any other outstanding equity securities of the Company, including all options and warrants, were cancelled. The holders of the existing voting common stock of the Company immediately before confirmation did not receive any voting shares of the emerging entity or any other consideration under the Plan of Reorganization as a result of their ownership interests of the Predecessor. This represented a complete change of control in the ownership of the Company. Promptly following the Merger, HLI distributed to certain holders of allowed claims, under the terms of the Plan of Reorganization, an amount in cash, the New Common Stock, the Series A Warrants, the Series B Warrants and the Preferred Stock (as defined below). Prior to the Merger, the Old Common Stock was registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). In reliance on Rule 12g-3(a) of the Exchange Act, by virtue of the status of New Hayes as a successor issuer to the Company, the New Common Stock is deemed registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act. The Company filed a Form 15 with the SEC to terminate the registration of the Old Common Stock under the Exchange Act.

      Pursuant to the terms of the Plan of Reorganization, HLI issued 100,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $1.00, of HLI (the “Preferred Stock”) to the holders of certain allowed claims. In accordance with the terms of the Preferred Stock, the shares of Preferred Stock are, at the holder’s option, exchangeable into a number of fully paid and nonassessable shares of New Common Stock equal to (i) the aggregate liquidation preference of the shares of Preferred Stock so exchanged ($100 per share plus all accrued and unpaid dividends thereon (whether or not declared) to the exchange date) divided by (ii) 125% of the “Emergence Share Price.” As determined pursuant to the terms of the Plan of Reorganization, the Emergence Share Price is $18.50.

      In connection with the Debtors’ emergence from Chapter 11, on the Effective Date, HLI entered into a $550.0 million senior secured credit facility, as amended by Amendment No. 1 and Waiver to Credit Agreement, dated October 16, 2003 and Amendment No. 2 and Waiver to the Credit Agreement dated February 6, 2004, by Amendment No. 3 dated May 6, 2004 and by Waiver to the Credit Agreement dated June 1, 2004 (as amended, the “New Credit Facility”). The New Credit Facility consists of a $450.0 million six-year amortizing term loan (the “New Term Loan”) and a five-year $100.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). In addition, HLI issued on the Effective Date an aggregate of $250.0 million principal amount of 10 1/2% senior notes due 2010 (the “New Senior Notes”). The proceeds from the initial $450.0 million of borrowings under the New Credit Facility and the net proceeds from the New Senior Notes were used to make payments required under the Plan of Reorganization, including the repayment of the Company’s DIP Facility and a payment of $477.3 million to certain prepetition lenders, to pay related transaction costs and to refinance certain debt.

8

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Reorganization items as reported in the consolidated statements of operations of the Predecessor included herein are comprised of income, expense and loss items that were realized or incurred by the Debtors as a direct result of the Company’s decision to reorganize under Chapter 11. During the one month and four months ended May 31, 2003 respectively, reorganization items were as follows (dollars in millions):

      On May 30, 2002, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order approving, among other things, the critical employee retention plan (the “CERP”) filed with the Bankruptcy Court in February 2002 which was designed to compensate certain critical employees in order to assure their retention and availability during the Company’s restructuring. The plan has two components which (i) rewarded critical employees who remained with the Company (and certain affiliates of the Company who are not directly involved in the restructuring) during and through the completion of the restructuring (the “Retention Bonus”) and (ii) provided additional incentives to a more limited group of the most senior critical employees if the enterprise value upon completing the restructuring exceeded an established baseline (the “Restructuring Performance Bonus”).

      Thirty-five percent, or approximately $3.0 million, of the Retention Bonus was paid on October 1, 2002. The remaining portion of the Retention Bonus of approximately $5.9 million was paid on June 13, 2003. Further, the Restructuring Performance Bonus provided under the CERP was paid after the consummation of the restructuring as discussed below.

      Based on the Company’s compromise total enterprise value of $1,250.0 million as confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, the aggregate amount of the Restructuring Performance Bonus is $12.1 million. Of the aggregate $12.1 million, approximately $6.0 million was paid in cash on July 1, 2003, and approximately $2.0 million was paid on August 28, 2003 as determined by the Company’s Board of Directors. The remaining portion of the Restructuring Performance Bonus was paid in 215,935 shares of restricted units of New Hayes on July 28, 2003. Pursuant to provisions contained in the CERP, the restricted units will vest as follows, subject to the participant’s continued employment:

	•	one half of the restricted units vested on June 3, 2004, the first anniversary of the Effective Date, and;
	•	one half of the restricted units will vest on the second anniversary of the Effective Date.

      Cash payments with respect to other reorganization items not discussed above consisted primarily of professional fees and cure payments and were approximately $10.4 million and $21.2 million during the two months ended July 31, 2003 and the four months ended May 31, 2003, respectively.

      As discussed in Note 1, the Company filed a voluntary petition for reorganization relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in December 2001 and emerged from Chapter 11 on June 3, 2003. Upon emergence

9

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

from Chapter 11, the Company implemented fresh start accounting principles (see Note 3, “Fresh Start Accounting”) pursuant to American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) Statement of Position 90-7, “Financial Reporting by Entities in Reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code” (“SOP 90-7”). SOP 90-7 requires the segregation of liabilities subject to compromise by the Bankruptcy Court as of the bankruptcy filing date, and identification of all transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization of the Predecessor. As a result of the application of fresh start accounting on May 31, 2003, and in accordance with SOP 90-7, the post- emergence financial results of the Company for the period ending July 31, 2004 and the period ended July 31, 2003 are presented as the “Successor” and the pre-emergence financial results of the Company for the period ending May 31, 2003 are presented as the “Predecessor.” Comparative financial statements do not straddle the emergence date because in effect the Successor Company represents a new entity. Per share and share information for the Predecessor Company for all periods presented on the consolidated statement of operations have been omitted as such information is deemed to be not meaningful.

      The Company’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not include all of the disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim period results have been included. Operating results for the interim periods presented in fiscal 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending January 31, 2005.

      Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

      The Company accounts for its stock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. As such, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price. The Company follows the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” and discloses pro forma net income (loss) and pro forma earnings (loss) per share as if employee stock option grants were treated as compensation expense using the fair-value-based method defined in SFAS No. 123.

      In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” This Statement amends SFAS No. 123 to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements.

10

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      If compensation expense had been determined based on the fair value at the grant date consistent with the method prescribed in SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net loss and loss per share amounts would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts below (dollars in millions):

      As of the Effective Date, all options under the Predecessor Company’s stock option plans were cancelled and those plans were terminated. Accordingly, no pro forma net income (loss) or pro forma earnings (loss) per share have been presented for any of the stock options granted under those terminated plans.

      The Company recognized $3.2 million of compensation expense related to restricted stock units during the six months ended July 31, 2004.

      Pursuant to SOP 90-7, the accounting for the effects of the Company’s reorganization occurred once the Plan of Reorganization was confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court and there were no remaining contingencies material to completing the implementation of the plan. The fresh start accounting principles pursuant to SOP 90-7 provide, among other things, for the Company to determine the value to be assigned to the equity of the reorganized Company as of a date selected for financial reporting purposes. As discussed in Note 1, the Debtors emerged from Chapter 11 on June 3, 2003, and the Company has selected May 31, 2003 for financial reporting purposes as the date to implement fresh start accounting principles.

      Pursuant to SOP 90-7, the results of operations of the Company ended May 31, 2003 include (i) a pre-emergence extraordinary gain of $1,076.7 million resulting from the discharge of debt and other liabilities under the Plan of Reorganization; (ii) pre-emergence charges to earnings of $25.9 million recorded as Reorganization items related to certain costs and expenses resulting from the Plan of Reorganization becoming effective; and (iii) a pre-emergence pre-tax gain of $63.1 million ($17.1 million, net of tax) resulting from the aggregate remaining changes to the net carrying value of the Company’s pre-emergence assets and liabilities to reflect the fair values under fresh start accounting.

      The Company’s compromise total enterprise value is $1,250.0 million, with a total value for common equity of $544.4 million, excluding the estimated fair value of the Preferred Stock and the Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants issued on the Effective Date. The Preferred Stock is classified as a liability in the consolidated balance sheet and referred to as redeemable preferred stock of subsidiary. Under fresh start accounting, the compromise total enterprise value has been allocated to the Company’s assets based on their respective fair values in conformity with the purchase method of accounting for business combinations in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations;” any portion not attributed to specific tangible or identified intangible assets has been recorded as an indefinite-lived intangible asset referred to as “reorganization value in excess of amounts allocable to identifiable assets” and reported as goodwill. The valuations required to determine the fair value of certain of the Company’s assets as presented below represent the results of the valuation procedures performed by the Company’s valuation specialist at May 31, 2003.

11

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The compromise total enterprise value (reorganization value) represents the amount of resources available, or that become available, for the satisfaction of post-petition liabilities and allowed claims, as negotiated between the Debtors and the creditors (the “interested parties”). This value along with other terms of the Plan of Reorganization were determined only after extensive arms-length negotiations amongst the interested parties. Each interested party developed its view of what the value should be based primarily upon expected future cash flows of the business after emergence from Chapter 11, discounted at rates reflecting perceived business and financial risks. This value is viewed as the fair value of the entity before considering liabilities and approximates the amount a willing buyer would pay for the assets of the Company immediately after restructuring.

      The amount of reorganization value in excess of amounts allocated to identifiable assets (goodwill) is a function of compromise total enterprise value. While the Company believes that the compromise total enterprise value approximates fair value, differences between the methodology used in testing for goodwill impairment and the negotiated value could adversely impact the Company’s future results of operations.

12

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The consolidated balance sheet presented below gives effect to the Plan of Reorganization and the application of fresh start accounting at May 31, 2003.

REORGANIZED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

May 31, 2003